IUC Happy Easter, Happy Passover: OJ Death Threat; Bubble Boy; Kendall Bares Bod at Church; Brad’s Wood Rotting!!!!

Posted on April 6th, 2015 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

OJ Gets Death Threats from Fellow Inmate – NY Post

Ashton and Shatner wear yellow to support “Bubble Boy” – Mirror

Kendall Jenner forget to wear clothes to Church – Hollywood Lifekendall easter

Brad’s hurricane homes rotting – Daily Mail

News Flash: Something New Coming Soon!!!!

  1. becca becks said on April 6th, 2015 at 1:50 pm

    Happy Spring to all.
    Here in the NW of America spring is busting out all over.
    I hope all stay safe in the world.
    God Bless.

    Reply
  2. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2015 at 2:06 pm

    @becca becks:

    Same to you. Here in the NE winter is hanging on for dear life.

    Reply
  3. WR said on April 6th, 2015 at 3:23 pm

    Here in Lower Calif., we are told to use water less and less, because of the drought. So far, nobody seems threatened or about to leave while they can get good accommodations elsewhere.
    Easter was balmy and a bit chilly.

    Yes, and Happy Spring to you, bb, Guest 2, and everyone.

    Reply
  4. WR said on April 6th, 2015 at 3:24 pm

    It looks like, with the great success of Biblical stories, we may see more in the near future. Money talks very loud in Hollywood.

    Reply
  5. becca becks said on April 7th, 2015 at 9:33 am

    @WR:
    To bad they are just stories, like all made of hollyweird things are.
    The real truth is out there, but they do not want you to know.
    Programming….

    Reply
  6. Keane said on April 9th, 2015 at 3:23 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3032104/Angelina-Jolie-Brad-Pitt-want-adopt-little-girl-Syria-join-Maddox-Pax-Zahara-Shiloh-Vivienne-Knox.html

    So no acting or directing gigs on the slate for Angelina for 2015. Nothing really doing on the political front. Time to adopt another one of them babies then methinks. I mean, what’s just one more team of nannies to add to the mix after all?

    Reply
  7. WR said on April 10th, 2015 at 1:51 am

    He’s now over 50 yrs of age. We’re sure that isn’t his natural hair color; it’s now probably white. So if the new tax deduction, er, babys, grows to twenty, he’ll be in his 70s. If the planet is still spinning, that is.

    Reply
  8. WR said on April 10th, 2015 at 1:59 am

    @WR:
    Well now, several predicted she was running out of body parts to sacrifice for publicity’s sake, and for protection from hereditary genes; so she’d adopt another baby. These people are far more savvy than I. Thought Brangelina would be wise enough to stop using children that way.

    Reply
  9. WR said on April 10th, 2015 at 2:12 am

    For Robert Wagner watchers, The National Enquirer is challenging him to take a lie detector test. And Natalie’s sister, Lana, is asking actor, Christopher Walken, to come out and tell all he knows. If one read the book on Natalie, by the yacht captain, with Marti Rulli, there is a strong suspicion that CW was threatened, as well as the captain, in November, 1981.

    The next to last page, of GOODBYE NATALIE, GOODBYE, SPLENDOUR, has this in the second paragraph: “Dennis knows the truth. Dennis says, “My first reaction was that Wagner had everything to do with Natalie’s death, and it is my belief to this day that Natalie is a victim of her husband. I saw too much that night to ever believe it was an accident.”

    Reply
  10. WR said on April 10th, 2015 at 2:24 am

    @WR:
    Oh, and as I was browsing the tabloid, there is yet another Brangelina article. It”s telling the public that their love life is “rotten”. Duh! Allegedly, their private letters were filched at their French chateau. Ah, the problems of the multi-millionaires.

    On an internet site, a headline claims that BP’s post-Katrina houses are “rotting”.
    Wow, Brangelina’s love story is described as “rotten”; and now, his housing project is supposedly “rotting”. What next, eh? Oh, adopt another baby, that’s what!

    Reply
  11. Keane said on April 10th, 2015 at 9:40 am

    @WR:

    “she was running out of body parts to sacrifice for publicity’s sake” – LOL at that!

    Reply
  12. WC Kitty said on April 10th, 2015 at 1:01 pm

    @WR:
    If he is responsible for her death, and the captain and CW were threatened, then he’ll probably take the test and he’ll pass it. Not because he is innocent, but because he is then probably one of those people without a conscience that have no problem passing those tests. Those tests only work on people who can feel guilt. In other words, they need to find physical proof in order to convict him.

    Reply
  13. WR said on April 10th, 2015 at 2:37 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    I have a premonition. And it’s because I’ve watched numerous detective/forensic files/crime shows. At times, as the law is tightening its grip on the suspect, the person feels trapped. No longer can he count on the good life to which he’s accustomed. (In addition, RW is 85 yrs. of age.) Utter despair drives them; and they quit this life. Not every suspect, mind you.

    Reply
  14. Guest2 said on April 10th, 2015 at 6:34 pm

    New pics of Brad with a very hot young man. He actually looks pretty good here compared to how he usually looks. I guess this is a co-star, maybe.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3034160/Brad-Pitt-wears-shaggy-hair-prescription-glasses-star-film-Big-Short.html

    Reply
  15. WR said on April 10th, 2015 at 11:45 pm

    @Guest2:
    It’s so obvious he’s wearing a wig.

    Reply
  16. Lovah said on April 11th, 2015 at 12:07 pm

    @Keane:

    Hey Keane. I’ve just been reading some really old Brangelina stuff on this here site. Have loved many of yours posts on brang/general stuff about the industry. Odd request, but can you maybe hit me on my email Lurve1945@gmail.com. I’m a big time gossip buff. Never buy into the orchestrated images, and such. Love sites like these as a result. I just have some questions about industry.

    Reply
  17. Guest2 said on April 11th, 2015 at 2:01 pm

    @WR:
    Yes, it is. But at least his clothes are clean and he doesn’t look like a hobo, as he usually does. I’ll never understand how someone who pays so much money for clothes can make them look so cheap and dirty.

    Reply
  18. WR said on April 12th, 2015 at 1:34 am

    @Guest2:
    He is very contradictory, if the media is right. On the one hand, he supposedly says he doesn’t use toilet paper. Why, one wonders; even the poorest of the poor use toilet paper. Then he travels all over the world; eats well; flies to his chateau, and other places.

    There were reports of his bad body odor a long time ago. Around the time, that Madonna had such things said about her. Now, J. Depp seems to have gone that route. It’s one thing to go without bathing when one is young; quite another when one is middle-aged. Could be that’s the reason for the change.

    Reply
  19. anonymous said on April 13th, 2015 at 11:19 pm

    That’s one of his co-stars Finn Wittrock. How stupid is the Daily Mail not to know that. He was also in Unbroken. Do these papers even bother to check facts?

    Reply
  20. Keane said on April 14th, 2015 at 3:42 pm

    @Lovah:

    Hi there – thanks for your message but I’m afraid I wouldn’t really e-mail anyone privately – not unless there was a really good reason to do so anyway! If you have anything you wanted to ask me on the board though then of course I would be happy to discuss it here. :-)

    Reply
  21. Keane said on April 14th, 2015 at 3:44 pm

    @Guest2:

    Boyfriend alert! lol

    Reply
  22. Guest2 said on April 14th, 2015 at 8:14 pm

    @Keane:
    You seem to have an admirer. Maybe it’s ole ange propositioning you.

    Reply
  23. Keane said on April 15th, 2015 at 5:45 am

    @Guest2:

    Yes – bit of a weird one wasn’t it. Not sure why anyone would want to ask me questions about gossip through private e-mail correspondence when we can pretty much say anything we like as anonymous posters here. I also don’t really have the time or the inclination to go to the trouble of sending someone a private e-mail just to chat about celeb gossip or the media world. There would certainly need to be a much stronger reason than that for me to bother to communicate with someone privately – sorry Lovah!

    Reply
  24. Guest2 said on April 15th, 2015 at 1:14 pm

    Did Jolie plagiarize Ernest Hemingway with her movie By The Sea?

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=684059&sid=14adf2f3dce7ca3ae2026327254cbaba&start=150

    Reply
  25. LG said on April 15th, 2015 at 10:58 pm

    Keanne is being targeted by someone called “Lovah” ……If Ian wants us everyday folks to put our theories forward without fear of being hacked then he has to reassure us that the likes of “annoymous”, “lovah’ and even the likes of “me” are being monitored carefully.

    In an earlier post Keanne mentioned the problem she had with “hacking”…..What assurances does Ian have with us loyal followers of this site???

    Reply
  26. LG said on April 15th, 2015 at 11:06 pm

    @Lovah:
    You know what Lovah…”Get Fucked” for asking qustions like that without proving your reliability…you want something for nothing and I think keanne has given more than enough..,.you’re suspect!

    Reply
  27. LG said on April 15th, 2015 at 11:28 pm

    Let’s look at the disclosure of “Brangelina’s personal correspondence being stolen”..from the chateaux”
    Number 1 this disclosure benefits Brad
    Number 2 this disclosure benefits Angelina
    Number 3 this disclosure benefits them as a couple ……ummmhh a tricky one….. I’m betting that Brad has divested more into the children than Angeilna has and that if it was not for him they would be “fucked’

    Reply
  28. LG said on April 16th, 2015 at 3:02 am

    What I’m trying to say is who benefits from the disclosure. They as individuals or as a couiple. I think Brad benefits the most from the publicity of stolen letters. He has invested more emotionally and especially financially than Angelina. She’s sucked the living daylights out of him, energy wise, and now he has nothing to lose.

    If these letters were so personal and valuable, he could easily have bought a safe. He knows their private stuff would be a goldmine for a would be thief. I can’t believe for one second this hasn’t happened “on purpose”. He so wants out….well that’s how it looks to me

    Reply
  29. Keane said on April 16th, 2015 at 6:46 am

    @LG:

    Thanks LG – it’s ok though – if I had e-mailed him/her there would of course have been no way I would have e-mailed them from a genuine e-mail address. Plus they already know that one anyway as they’ve already been in there so not sure what point it would serve. Main problem with Lovah’s post is there is no way I have the time or inclination to e-mail someone just to answer a few questions they have about gossip. Seriously if anyone wanted to lure me into a private convo with them – there’d have to think of a much better reason than that!

    Reply
  30. Guest2 said on April 16th, 2015 at 10:32 am

    @LG:
    Probably nothing was stolen. I doubt they’d be stupid enough to write letters to each other (actually, they both seem pretty lazy to me) and put them through the mail. It’s like the stolen camera rumor, all these rumors are put out by them just to keep their names in the tabloids, or as a game they play with each other. No other celebrity has so many crazy stories about them, except for maybe Aniston and the Clooneys and I think much of that is put out there by AJ, and maybe BP. Brad’s a mess, true, but he’s also a 50+ man who can get himself out of that situation if he really wants to. I think the relationship suits them both since fidelity is not essential to either one of them. It’s a perfect cover for living an in-the-closet gay or bisexual lifestyle, not to mention drugs. What a price to pay, though, judging from their appearance. JMO.

    Reply
  31. joanne said on April 16th, 2015 at 1:05 pm

    Someone told me there is someone in the UK using my name with the lower case j. I guess this has been going on for awhile. I guess someone pretending to be me is flattering but fucked up. If throughout the past years I insulted anyone please ask me if it was me. To the copycat. find your own fucking name please.

    Reply
  32. Guest2 said on April 16th, 2015 at 10:01 pm

    This It is a fascinating thread at FF about new Sony email leaks posted by WikiLeaks. Seems to confirm that many of the loons are posters paid by AJ. I don’t know who these women are at FF but they are amazing in what info they can dredge up. I really hope the wicked witch will finally crash and burn.

    https://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=684647

    Reply
  33. rushdog said on April 16th, 2015 at 10:53 pm

    Hello all! It took me a while to think through Ian’s post here. It’s not just a list of headlines on Monday, April 6th. It represents what Ian is trying to say about the usual suspects. Ian has referred to them as being prisoners to their image in previous riddles. An update. A fight Easter weekend.

    Happy Easter – April 5th
    Happy Passover – began the evening of 4/3

    Easter weekend – prisoners verbal & physical argument with threats…he is threatened with “death” = loss of image…celebs support the male with life-threatening vulnerability who wears a protective shield…her – (the empress wears no clothes) pretentiousness and hypocrisy…Brad’s violent storm home decay.

    photo scroll: Kendall Easter – celebrity daughter with long, dark hair – represents AJ here.

    tags: BP, celeb daughter, protective cover, prisoner

    The celeb daughter is the protective cover = the beard (as were GP and JA)
    That’s his vulnerability, it contrasts with his image and why he is a prisoner. It’s how she threatens him. A reveal would shatter his image.

    Reply
  34. rushdog said on April 16th, 2015 at 10:58 pm

    Then read just the list of publications:

    NY Post…Mirror…Hollywood Life…Daily Mail

    The NY “post” mirrors HW life daily.
    Verbal & physical arguments and threats mirror their hw life daily.

    Reply
  35. rushdog said on April 16th, 2015 at 11:14 pm

    @LG:
    He’s the one who has been going back to France. I think it’s his threat to her. I think the “letters” were her way of creating headlines at the time she gave the interview. The “letters” now threaten to “reveal” and create more headlines and not necessarily positive. War of the roses being played out in the tabloids. Just my guess.

    Reply
  36. Guest2 said on April 17th, 2015 at 7:11 am

    @rushdog:
    I don’t know how you figured all that out but it makes a lot of sense and it explains why he wouldn’t leave (though I’m still not entirely convinced he wants to leave). She is vicious enough to do that and it would not only shatter his image but that of GP and JA to a lesser degree by revealing them as beards. She’s already done a number on JA through her paid posters. Not sure if you read the thread at FF that I linked above but it’s about some newly released Sony emails between jolie and pascal and rudin. The messages from pascal to jolie suggest a relationship between them that is more than professional. Jolie’s personal email is revealed and the gals at FF established some kind of connection to that email and photos/Chivan paid posters. Somehow I don’t think all those women at FF are just ordinary housewives.

    Reply
  37. WC Kitty said on April 17th, 2015 at 1:46 pm

    @Guest2:
    Not saying that your wrong, but wouldn’t that bring to light that she was also nothing more than a beard? After all she’s been with him the longest and they have children together. Also, wouldn’t that reveal that whatever statements that she has made about her and Brad’s relationship was a lie? I believe that whatever she has on Brad (I’m sure she does) is something that if she reveals will not stick to her.

    Reply
  38. Keane said on April 17th, 2015 at 3:46 pm

    @Guest2:

    I’m pretty sure GP was a genuine relationship…

    No idea about Jen though – this was always more Kate’s special area of interest…

    Reply
  39. Guest2 said on April 17th, 2015 at 5:42 pm

    @Keane:
    Whatever happened to Kate? Seems she left a long time ago before the other original posters and we haven’t heard form her since.

    Reply
  40. Guest2 said on April 17th, 2015 at 5:47 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    I don’t know, I guess it would. What could she have against him that wouldn’t stick to her, though? Certainly not drugs, that’s would stick to her like glue. I wonder if we’ll ever know the truth. Did you read that thread at FF about the newly discovered Sony emails?

    Reply
  41. WC Kitty said on April 17th, 2015 at 5:52 pm

    @Guest2:
    Oh yes I have been reading them! I find them kind of hard to follow since I’m supposed to be working on other things – probably like everybody else! :lol: I don’t know what she could have on him, but it must be a doozy if it’s keeping sorta in line. There was that Brad wearing diapers story. Maybe she has photos! :shock:

    Reply
  42. Keane said on April 17th, 2015 at 6:00 pm

    @Guest2:

    I don’t know – I heard that she was not very well. I’ve not been in touch with her for years because we fell out over something – the details of which I am sorry to say I have now completely forgotten! It’s a shame she doesn’t wish to/ can’t contribute at the moment – I miss her insights!

    Reply
  43. Keane said on April 17th, 2015 at 6:04 pm

    @Guest2:

    The Sony e-mails are interesting – Amy Pascal just sounds totally in thrall to AJ and unable to manage her in an effective way. I think Rudin was blowing his top out of frustration with Pascal’s inability to keep her in her place i.e. “she is just an actress for hire, not Cleopatra”. Sounds like Pascal has allowed AJ to wield way too much control in the making of the films she features in and now it is like the tail is wagging the dog. I think Rudin was just trying to wrestle back control over his own project and make it clear that Angelina would not be a co-producer on it!

    Reply
  44. Guest2 said on April 17th, 2015 at 7:11 pm

    @Keane:
    I think AJ/AP have, or had, a “personal” relationship and that’s the power that AJ wields over Amy. I think Amy would have done anything to keep her luvvah happy. JMO for what it’s worth.

    Reply
  45. Guest2 said on April 17th, 2015 at 7:15 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    I know, I got up early this morning and checked email then decided to make a quick stop at FF. I ended up being late for work reading just the latest pages. You really have to pay attention to follow it all. I don’t know how those women find this stuff. I couldn’t find anything on the WikiLeaks site even with the identifying info the “gals” posted on that thread.

    Reply
  46. Keane said on April 18th, 2015 at 7:12 am

    @Guest2:
    If you go into advanced search and put in key words like Angie and search in the Sony documents only then you should be able to find them quite easily.

    Reply
  47. Togi said on April 18th, 2015 at 2:05 pm

    They say that curiosity killed the cat. Well, guess what. TOGI is a cat so she was VERY curious to see what all this FF/Sony Leak/AJ nonsense was all about. So, little Togi went over to FF to check it out. OMG. I can’t believe this stuff REALLY HAPPEN(S)(ED)!!!!! How, oh how, will these people ever live this down? Bahhahahahahahah. What nasty, nasty, immature rascals they are. Now, I think I’ll just go back to grooming myself. ;) @Guest2:

    Reply
  48. Guest2 said on April 18th, 2015 at 3:55 pm

    @Togi:
    I know, it’s absolutely unbelievable. Nasty and vicious. That thread is up to 40 pages and I’m hoping they come up with more emails. Everything we’ve ever believed about AJ and more is out there for all to see.

    Reply
  49. Togi said on April 18th, 2015 at 4:11 pm

    I laughed out loud a number of times. @Guest2:

    Reply
  50. Keane said on April 18th, 2015 at 4:33 pm

    @Lovah:

    Curious how the format of Lovah’s e-mail address (lurve1945@gmail.com) is similar to Angelina’s (1365@chivanproductions.net) is similar to Angelina’s huh? Probably just a coincidence…

    Reply
  51. Keane said on April 18th, 2015 at 4:39 pm

    @Togi:

    Do you mean Rudin’s comments? I am actually surprised that people find it that strange. This kind of bitchy, I’m having a nervous breakdown because of this person type commentary is really normal in the tv industry. Except usually we all have the presence of mind not to do it by e-mail – and definitely not our official work one! Amy Pascal really was sloppy and seemingly completely infatuated by Angelina – I am really not surprised that she got fired. I wonder if her replacement will be quite so in thrall to AJ?

    Reply
  52. Keane said on April 18th, 2015 at 4:40 pm

    @Keane:

    I’m still waiting for Lovah to pop back up and tell me what the real reason was she wanted me to e-mail her. (I think I may be waiting some time!).

    Reply
  53. Guest2 said on April 18th, 2015 at 5:09 pm

    @Keane:
    It’s also similar to the loon poster Thelookoflove1365 that the FF gals say bashes Aniston on the loon sites and that some believe is AJ herself. Maybe a coincidence or maybe not. Someone wants to know who you are. Ian used to say that AJ came here on Mondays, remember that? I think she also posts over at FF. JMO but she’s whacked out enough to do it. All those crazy, vile loons that used to come here wishing death on people I now believe are tied to her in some way.

    Did you also see where one of the emails lists Holly’s address as the compound in Los Feliz? I could see those two getting drunk and entertaining themselves here or at other sites. As long as people are talking about her, good or bad, her ego is big enough that she would enjoy it.

    Reply
  54. Keane said on April 18th, 2015 at 5:30 pm

    @Guest2:

    Yes – they’re all remarkably similar aren’t they? As I’ve said before the Holly/James/whoever characters are really sloppy like that – there doesn’t seem to be a lot of brain there. Lovah’s post was also quite telling in that he/she tried to repeat my own words back to me (by saying “orchestrated images” etc) and tried to present a convincing back story about why they were getting in touch (”I’ve been going through the archives and reading through your old posts” – yeah, who honestly does that without a vested interest? Same as Holly remembering I went to Florence and the Machine’s record launch – even I couldn’t remember exactly what that event was and I was there!) – it screamed plant to me. Thing is though is that I have no idea why they would want me to e-mail them as they already know who I am. They have posted on the site under my real name and regularly reference programmes I have made which I have never referred to here so it is obvious they have my CV. So yes, why they want to try to have a private convo with me now is beyond me. They know who I am and I know who they are so there’s really no need for us to have an offline chat. I genuinely have no idea what Lovah thought they were going to achieve!

    Reply
  55. Keane said on April 18th, 2015 at 6:07 pm

    Meant to say as well that I would imagine that the reason Holly only posts here sporadically is that she does it in her down time when she doesn’t have PA duties to do for AJ. Having worked as a PA myself in my time I can remember that you have hours some days where you have literally nothing to do. Methinks commenting here and on other sites is what Holly has been tasked with doing whenever she has run out of other jobs to do. Am I right Holly? lol

    Reply
  56. Guest2 said on April 18th, 2015 at 6:11 pm

    @Keane:
    Did I understand you correctly that someone posted on this site (or was it FF?) under your real name? If they know who you are why not email Luvah to see what they want? You can always set up an anonymous email account.

    Reply
  57. Guest2 said on April 18th, 2015 at 6:13 pm

    @Guest2:
    By anonymous I meant not revealing your real email address.

    Reply
  58. Keane said on April 18th, 2015 at 6:52 pm

    @Guest2:

    Yes – years ago. They made a comment pretending to be me which is identity theft – a crime in the UK. I reported it to the police and got a crime reference number for it. That’s what I mean about them not being too bright – not bright enough to have researched UK internet law in any case. Re: Lovah I just don’t care enough to bother e-mailing them. As I said – they’d have to have given me a much bigger lure than that to make me go to the effort of setting up a fake e-mail account and e-mailing them. If anyone else fancies doing it on my behalf though then of course be my guest!

    Reply
  59. beccabecks said on April 19th, 2015 at 10:07 am

    Daily mail is talking all about AJ & BP adopting from Syria. Those two crazy (Loon bird) kids are at it again. Wow all those children. Did I read a ad for four new nannies needed asap with no questions asked ? Lets hope they all turn out better than all the other Hollyweird children. If you do not know the chance they make it out alive is not good.

    Reply
  60. WR said on April 19th, 2015 at 4:50 pm

    @beccabecks:

    We consider the source: Together, they can do the damage, without any nagging conscience to thwart them.

    With their multi-millions, they can afford to keep in good health, barring any unforeseen tragedy. But if such a thing happens, they will milk it for all it’s worth.

    Reply
  61. WR said on April 20th, 2015 at 6:58 pm

    Got a scam letter, today. Inside, are promises of untold riches, power and a long and healthy life. All I have to do, is accept their offer of FREE SECRETS, and the sky’s the limit. I’ll be in the company of super-stars; politicians, and the filthy rich; although the latter wasn’t described as such. 10 pages. Nice, easy-to-read format. I would have to accept within 3-4 days, or my once-in-a-lifetime offer would have to be sent to someone more receptive to untold riches revealed in the FREE SECRETS.

    So I went online, and sure enough, there are many, many others who received the offer.

    Reply
  62. WR said on April 21st, 2015 at 6:57 pm

    @WR:
    Many such scams on the landline. I mistook one for a legit business. Mistake. Just too busy with various businesses; so I let my guard down. Now they have my number. Hope this will help someone to be cautious about unfamiliar callers, no matter how tied up you are with legit callers/

    Reply
  63. Guest2 said on April 22nd, 2015 at 11:37 am

    @WR:
    There are many scams out there, especially on the telephone. I’ve taken to just clicking off now if it’s someone I don’t know. Seems a bit rude but they intrude into my home so it doesn’t concern me too much. The charities, too, have become very aggressive and I’ve found myself clicking off from those phone calls as well. I understand people have jobs to do but if they become offensive I don’t mind just hanging up.

    Reply
  64. Keane said on April 22nd, 2015 at 1:31 pm

    @Guest2:

    Weirdly I am having a similar problem over here right now in the UK. I have somehow found myself on a list of people who should be called to try to sell absolutely anything whatsoever to – at one point I was getting a good five calls a day. Now it has started on the doorstep too with marketing companies and charities ringing my doorbell every day. When I asked who the caller was yesterday they said :”I’m from a charity for deaf children can you buzz me in please?” – I was like, arm, “Can I buzz you into my home? Er, I don’t think so – no!”

    Reply
  65. WC Kitty said on April 22nd, 2015 at 2:58 pm

    @Guest2:
    I’m on the “do not call list” and I will still get a call now and then from very weird numbers and nobody responds and then it’s click. I look the number up on the Internet and will see that others get the same treatment from the same number. There are all sorts of weird things going on and some calls are from out of the country.

    Reply
  66. WC Kitty said on April 22nd, 2015 at 2:59 pm

    Guest2, what do you think of what is going on at FF?

    Reply
  67. Guest2 said on April 22nd, 2015 at 7:14 pm

    @Keane:
    The only door solicitors we are seeing here (so far) are from an alternative company that provides electricity. I personally have not seen them yet but I’ve heard some horror stories of them just walking into homes if the doors are not locked and scaring the people who live there. One person I know of asked the man to leave and he kept talking until she threatened to call police. It’s a strange world we live in these days.

    Reply
  68. WR said on April 22nd, 2015 at 7:43 pm

    Thanks for the responses, everyone. It’s good to know what to do, and not feel like an inhospitable host, or worse.

    Didn’t mean to get off the FF track. They are the best!; although, I must say I don’t go there, because my thinking is, it’s only for women. Here, there aren’t many guys, except lurkers.

    I did try other sites. I could almost swear that paid posters are there. They all have the same tone. And they have to drag the victim, JA, into everything bad that’s happened to Brangelina, because of B’s free choices. Same old; same old. I applaud those who refuse to take the bait, the allegedly paid posters put out there. Some posters have taken to calling them “loonies”, which many of us have done, as well. They, the loonies, are the reason some of us keep up with their lies.

    Reply
  69. Guest2 said on April 22nd, 2015 at 8:28 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    I don’t really know what to make of it. I think there’s good and bad. The loons will now have to sign in but I hope the people who’ve been posting the good stuff from WikiLeaks don’t stop. I don’t post there but some have been complaining they are having trouble posting comments. I don’t care for the look of it.

    Reply
  70. WC Kitty said on April 22nd, 2015 at 9:02 pm

    @Guest2:
    I’ve posted a couple of times and tried a day or so ago. I couldn’t sign in and yea I agree that I hope the good posters don’t quit posting. However, I guess the “good guests” will have either become registered or go elsewhere. Too many “guests” makes it confusing, but that it a site that I would be scared to register at. I’ve noticed that the site it quite dead now, so was that the purpose?

    @WR:
    Yes, it appears there are paid “loonie” posters at FF, which makes me wonder what is going on over there. I miss a lot of the posters that were once at this site, but they appear to be gone so I go over to FF to read updates and other posters opinions. Like Guest2, I find those wikileaks enjoyable/fun to read! I believe that a couple of men post there and who knows maybe more. I believe it’s good to have a man’s perspective too! :)

    Reply
  71. WC Kitty said on April 22nd, 2015 at 9:03 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    Not “sign in” but post as “Guest”

    Reply
  72. WR said on April 22nd, 2015 at 10:21 pm

    I wonder if the man who persuaded the Queen to give AJ the honorary title has had something to do with the loss of good posting at FF. Maybe he, or his cohorts have “persuaded” the site to do less critical posting. Anything goes in that crazy world of Brangelina, it appears.

    Reply
  73. Guest2 said on April 22nd, 2015 at 11:17 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    I think men post there. In fact, I believe that insiders have been commenting there anonymously for years. So much in those Sony emails about Jolie validate what FF people have been saying about her and Pascal and Cleopatra for so long. Someone knew what they were talking about. Is it far-fetched to think Rudin put in his two cents every now and again? I hope this isn’t the beginning of the end of the FF forum. Maybe WR is right and AJ’s UK buddy had something to do with it. Or maybe it has something to do with the WikiLeaks thread. It’s been at 66 pages for a couple of days now. I would imagine a lot of people are pretty upset that all that stuff was made public. I love it, it’s been fascinating to get a peek into the world of studio execs and producers. The things they put into writing is just unbelievable but glad they did it.

    Reply
  74. WC Kitty said on April 23rd, 2015 at 1:32 am

    @WR:
    @Guest2:
    I didn’t think about the fact that since FF is a British site that “WH” could be intervening on AJ’s behalf. Then again I suppose that as Guest2 suggested, it is someone else who wants to stop the comments about the leaks. :(

    Reply
  75. Keane said on April 23rd, 2015 at 1:21 pm

    @Guest2:

    What is happening at FF? I have missed all this…

    Reply
  76. Capri said on April 23rd, 2015 at 3:04 pm

    Hi all, it’s been a while. I posted almost exclusively at FF for many years as guest and mostly lurked here. I did register once at FF, but when I sign in now, FF says welcome back…but it doesn’t allow my posts to go through.
    LOL..at you here using the ‘loonie’..that was one of mine that I used so much (among others) that it got picked up and spread. Booomerang was one I started until someone else (another guest) perfected it into the loonerang. Guest posters contributed a lot of opinions and ideas and it does burn my butt that now those registered think that it is a fair trade just to not have a few loonies on the site. There have been a few times of transition at FF that guests haven’t been able to post for a day or so, but never for any length of time so it’ll be interesting to see what happens now. I find it hard to believe I’ve been banned, having never attacked other posters. I never behaved in any offensive manner. Without the guests posters, it’s been averaging nearly 3 hours between posts for the last few posts and visitors to the site have been cut in half…totals seldom getting past mid twenties.

    Reply
  77. WC Kitty said on April 23rd, 2015 at 3:29 pm

    @Capri:
    Hi Capri! I noticed that at least one regular has posted registering information for “guests” in a manner that will keep our personal information safe. So, I suppose some are hoping that they will not lose as many posters, especially those that contribute to the forum. Another poster is hoping that the banning of “guests” will bring back some of their former posters and it will make the forum even better. I’m not one of those “guests” that they will miss since I’m not much of a poster over there (just a regular troll), but maybe they’ll miss your posts? We register here, so is registering there much different? Maybe you need to re-register? The site is pretty dead.

    Reply
  78. Guest2 said on April 23rd, 2015 at 3:33 pm

    @Keane:
    They’ve redesigned the format of the forum and now I guess you are required to register and sign in to post comments. Some of the posters have complained their posts don’t go through. Maybe it’s just an issue of some kinks being worked out though the appearance of the site has not improved.

    Reply
  79. Guest2 said on April 23rd, 2015 at 3:37 pm

    I hope the new format does bring back some old posters. It’s kind of fun seeing the old poster names up there. I hope it won’t discourage some who want to remain anonymous though. Time will tell. Although this site requires registration I don’t feel quite as uncomfortable as I would registering at FF so I’ll remain a lurker if I can’t post there as a guest (which I’ve done only once anyway!).

    @WC Kitty:

    Reply
  80. Guest2 said on April 23rd, 2015 at 3:38 pm

    Ian has not had much to say about the Sony leaks. Wish he’d weight in on some of this stuff.

    Reply
  81. Capri said on April 23rd, 2015 at 7:15 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    I did register about two years ago during a board upgrade back then, even if I hardly ever used it..to almost never. It lets me sign in with a welcome back but when I hit the block to post a comment it goes to an all white page. My comments aren’t going through. I was often scathing about their appearance and addictions so perhaps I am banned. I’m wondering if I’d’ even be able to reregister under a new name and net address since I ‘d still have the same IP. I am definitely not one of those who are great at using their electronics or navigating the net.

    On the other hand, there was almost a four hour span of lack of posts until a poster posted in four threads. It is very quiet. I suppose that makes the brand and Amy happy. ;)

    Reply
  82. Guest2 said on April 23rd, 2015 at 8:16 pm

    @Capri:
    It’s disappointing that nothing new has been posted on the WikiLeaks thread. I was wondering if Sony had something to do with this. It has to be quite embarrassing for them that a former head of the studio behaved in such an unprofessional and even childish manner. How did she ever get into that position?

    Reply
  83. WC Kitty said on April 23rd, 2015 at 9:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    Vaj just posted that it appears that the archives are missing and how convenient it is for “SOMEONE EH”. :(
    ww.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685077&start=15

    Reply
  84. WC Kitty said on April 23rd, 2015 at 9:52 pm

    ww.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685077&start=15
    “Very convenient for SOMEONE, eh?” :$

    Reply
  85. Capri said on April 23rd, 2015 at 11:37 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    Several years ago during another site change, some of the best threads were lost. It seemed strange at the time that a lot of those pictures that disappeared with those threads also disappeared from the net. But then a lot of those pictures were saved by several FFers.

    @Guest2:
    I just keep hoping that Amy was NOT the norm. If I were an actor/actress who worked with Sony during her time at the top, I’d be worried about what she was gossiping about. That bwitchiness about Emily Blount was uncalled for. She is one of the few actresses that I thought always looked healthy. Guys lose weight for a role and get an award…EB did that years ago for a role and Amy still is using that instance to put down EB for an unknown reason. I wonder if Amy was as stupid in RL as her emails and EB gave her an eyeroll, etc. LOL

    Reply
  86. Guest2 said on April 24th, 2015 at 8:24 am

    @WC Kitty:
    I saw that. Everything prior to 2011 is gone.

    Reply
  87. Guest2 said on April 24th, 2015 at 10:19 am

    If the turmoil at FF doesn’t resolve maybe some of those posters can come here. It would be nice to see this site pick up steam again.

    Reply
  88. Capri said on April 24th, 2015 at 12:43 pm

    @Guest2:
    I just checked out FF. There was a total of 5 posts in four threads in almost 12 hours, from 4:28AM to 4:08PM. Since the guest bannings, I recognized only one of what I thought might be a new registration. They need another new release of emails.

    @WC Kitty:
    I used to laugh a bit at Vag’s crazy conspiracy theories but some of them were starting to appear more credible. She is right on the money with that comment. There were so many revelations there in just a few hours that it was very convenient for several someones and Sony also.

    Reply
  89. WC Kitty said on April 24th, 2015 at 3:17 pm

    @Capri:
    I read most of her posts and some of her posts have or do seem over-the-top. Voodoo is not something I’m into, but since I can’t disprove it and have seen things throughout my life that are not explainable, she could be right on that subject. One of those real-life reenactment ER shows had an episode that had a patient who needed a voodoo priestess or she would die, so what do I know. Out of curiosity, I went to a Hoodoo website because I’d never heard of it, and was disgusted that they actually had visitors looking at how to breakup marriages, even those with children involved. IMO, a marriage that isn’t meant to be will end on it’s own. The CIA etc., also could be true. I just don’t like her views/rantings on a certain subject, so I just skip over those.

    It would be nice if posters would return or new ones came here. If someone is actually messing (and has the power) with FF I definitely won’t register there.

    Reply
  90. Guest2 said on April 24th, 2015 at 4:51 pm

    Has anyone seen these pics of her most “humanitarian” event? She looks really quite clownish. I’m beginning to think she’s losing it a little bit. It seems to be harder for her to hide the crazy.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685184&sid=1d94543a624a285dc0b64bacda0f5844

    Reply
  91. WC Kitty said on April 24th, 2015 at 5:01 pm

    @Guest2:
    I find her bra-less show to be highly disrespectful and unprofessional, especially in a formal business setting. Many women have had surgery on their breasts (if she even had the surgery she claims) and you don’t see them running around with a full display. She could find a way to cover them if she wanted.

    Reply
  92. Keane said on April 24th, 2015 at 5:13 pm

    @WC Kitty:

    Yes it’s plead on behalf of the most desperate people in the world and whip your tits out at the same time isn’t it? Very bizarre even by her standards!

    Reply
  93. Guest2 said on April 24th, 2015 at 7:49 pm

    Did she have her own photographer with her at the UN to get all those close-up shots? Did you see the one of her winking at someone? Yikes!

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=269670&sid=d0e2b4d2ae4327edd087eb755bc10189&start=945

    Reply
  94. WC Kitty said on April 24th, 2015 at 7:56 pm

    @Guest2:
    She doesn’t look good at all. After seeing those pictures, did you see this thread and do you believe it?
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685198

    Reply
  95. Capri said on April 24th, 2015 at 10:36 pm

    @Guest2:
    That was at the London r@pe summit…..her appearance was just the thing for the subject, right? I think aroused nips are the most blatant uncontrollable sexual appearance a woman can have. The subject must have really had her going. Only drooling could have topped that. ;)

    Reply
  96. Guest2 said on April 25th, 2015 at 8:25 am

    @WC Kitty:
    I don’t know if I believe it. People mag does seem to favor her but then she is notorious for “faxing” these stories about herself, usually it has to do with turning down movies roles.

    Reply
  97. Guest2 said on April 25th, 2015 at 4:13 pm

    A new email was posted on the WikiLeaks thread at FF. It’s from Clooney to Pascal and the subject is “knowing this email is being hacked”. I wonder who he thought was hacking into the emails. Seems far fetched to think he was talking about NK, so who?

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=684647&start=975

    I don’t post at FF because I’m afraid to register but thanks to Snowbunny there for bringing over all those emails. Whoever she is she’s done a fantastic job.

    Reply
  98. Guest2 said on April 25th, 2015 at 4:31 pm

    I found this video on the JA board. It’s an interview with Courtney Cox and she briefly mentions how much she likes directing (hew new movie just opened). What a difference from the crazy one talking about directing.

    https://www.yahoo.com/style/courteney-cox-talks-wedding-rumors-directing-117235241478.html

    Reply
  99. WR said on April 25th, 2015 at 5:06 pm

    Went to a certain hair-cutting shop because of the woman who does the barbering. While I was there, a regular came in, and they were chatting. They mentioned PEOPLE magazine, and Sandra Bullock, who happened to be the choice of Most Beautiful”. One woman mentioned AJ, and said that she always thought that she and BP ” were a very strange couple!” That comment made me wonder if that’s a common opinion with tabloid readers.

    Reply
  100. WC Kitty said on April 25th, 2015 at 11:32 pm

    @Guest2:
    Thank you for the link. I believe I only watched part of one episode only because someone else in my family loved the show. It wasn’t that I didn’t like the show, it was because I had no time. Anyway, she appears to down to earth as well as a person who likes to have fun, something AJ would never be associated with. Did you see new photos posted to the link you posted above? It appears that she was posing throughout the session (photo-op :roll: )!
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685184&start=15

    Reply
  101. Guest2 said on April 26th, 2015 at 7:44 am

    @WC Kitty:
    Angelina Jolie in the role of UN Special Envoy. She looks clownish in the photo where she’s standing. Ted C was right on the money when he named her fake a la ferocity. I thought the Syrian ambassador’s comment that “she’s beautiful” when asked what he thought of her was more of an insult than a compliment.

    Reply
  102. Guest2 said on April 26th, 2015 at 4:44 pm

    Here she is with brother lover and oldest son, nose high up in the air. Brother’s been around quite a bit in the last few outings. Guess he’s taking hubby’s place?

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685313&sid=3ce48ebc2dc59920b24650a42b0e63bd

    Reply
  103. WC Kitty said on April 26th, 2015 at 5:06 pm

    @Guest2:
    Did you see the lyrics to a song sung by the band on Maddox’s t-shirt? In complete contrast to what comes out of AJ’s mouth! Even if I wasn’t involved with the UN, as a parent I wouldn’t let my child listen to or wear clothes displaying a band with that type of :twisted: attitude. Hasn’t she taken the time to sit down and talk to him about what that band sings about? Two parents who don’t walk the talk for sure. :roll:

    Reply
  104. Guest2 said on April 26th, 2015 at 6:32 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    I never heard of the band but the lyrics are shocking and repulsive. I can’t imagine any parent allowing the children to listen to that. I don’t know their private lives but if I had to guess I would think they are both drunk or strung out on drugs a good deal of the time when they are not off on location somewhere. When the kids aren’t being watched by nannies and bodyguards I would imagine they are pretty much on their own. I feel bad for that boy. He must have access to a lot of information on the internet despite what she says about monitoring their computers. Kids are pretty resourceful.

    Reply
  105. WR said on April 29th, 2015 at 4:54 pm

    I still have the autographed newspaper photo of Bruce Jenner, after he won his Olympics gold medal for winning the decathlon. I was determined to have at least one souvenir of an Olympic athlete, no matter who it might be.

    Reply
  106. WR said on April 29th, 2015 at 4:58 pm

    Oh, I read in the show-biz news, that a transgender regular will be introduced on a soap opera.
    There’s one already, who is popular; and she’s on “Orange is the New Black”. And no, I’m not interested in watching; in the least!

    Reply
  107. WR said on April 29th, 2015 at 5:13 pm

    Sad story, but one could muse about the possible scenario, when the young man lost the career-making part; especially, when it was reported BP was threatening to do p–n, if his career didn’t happen, soon.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3058451/Brad-Pitt-s-former-roommate-star-dead-drug-overdose-Thailand-aged-48.html

    Reply
  108. WR said on April 29th, 2015 at 5:14 pm

    It was reported that, back then, the victim “overslept”, and missed out on the part that made Pitt a star!

    Reply
  109. WR said on April 29th, 2015 at 5:15 pm

    @WR:
    Yes, we have no proof; so, it’s only JMO!

    Reply
  110. Guest2 said on April 29th, 2015 at 7:50 pm

    Looks like brother lover has been talking to the National Enquirer:

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685486&sid=6df44b4af8442ef45a4a446ff627f625

    Reply
  111. Guest2 said on April 30th, 2015 at 2:09 pm

    Okay, we’re still waiting for the news flash, soon passed long ago. What’s the scoop with brangie? Brad has a fresh bruise on his face. Jolie’s off traveling with brother, war of the roses is being played out in the tabloids.

    Reply
  112. Keane said on May 3rd, 2015 at 3:44 pm

    Hitting her “soccer mom” demographic:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3065672/Angelina-Jolie-picks-ice-cream-cheering-Shiloh-Zahara-soccer-game-Brad-Pitt.html

    With the cute twist that it is her daughters playing football rather than her sons of course – just to give her that bit of edge/ defying gender expectations etc (her PR stock-in-trade) – how neat!

    Reply
  113. WC Kitty said on May 3rd, 2015 at 5:03 pm

    @Keane:
    The debate is are those pictures old or did Brad have the bruise on his face photo-shopped out?

    Reply
  114. WC Kitty said on May 3rd, 2015 at 5:05 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    The wound on his face would still be showing, so did Jolie have those pictures released all the sudden to compete with?

    Reply
  115. Keane said on May 3rd, 2015 at 6:40 pm

    @WC Kitty:

    Yeah it looks like the same occasion as her supposed pre ovary-removal set. It would be very unusual for them to repeat the exact same occasion after they had done it so recently as it makes the pictures a lot less marketable. I am guessing they have released more images from the same set to keep up her profile during the royal birth and the Beckham’s 40th extravaganza in Marrakech. I was about to say she had been very quiet for a few days and was wondering why there was such a long radio silence. Kate Middleton is her biggest competition as she really is who Ange is trying to be (a royal family, successor to Princess Diana etc). Ange hates it when someone pops up who genuinely has the credentials she tries to feign.

    Reply
  116. Guest2 said on May 3rd, 2015 at 8:18 pm

    Agree they are old pix released to coincide with the birth of the princess in a UK publication. Does anyone else consider a camisole to be underwear designed to be worn under clothing, like a slip? Who dresses like that at a children’s sporting event no less?

    Reply
  117. Guest2 said on May 3rd, 2015 at 8:20 pm

    @Guest2:
    The princess was not born in a UK publication, bad editing.

    Reply
  118. sinker said on May 4th, 2015 at 2:40 pm

    @WC Kitty:

    I think Maddox’s shirt might be a football/soccer reference and not referring to the band Whitechapel – the band has a very distinctive looking logo, and that’s not it on his shirt.

    Reply
  119. WC Kitty said on May 4th, 2015 at 2:51 pm

    @sinker:
    Actually Sinker that is one of their shirts. http://whitechapel.merchnow.com/?page=3

    Reply
  120. WC Kitty said on May 4th, 2015 at 2:54 pm

    @Guest2:
    Yes I do, but I understand that young women do wear them as shirts. Jolie is not young and she wears them all the time, braless which is in bad taste when worn around children and to UN sessions. Totally without class or respect IMO.

    Reply
  121. TryAgain said on May 4th, 2015 at 5:29 pm

    @sinker:

    Yes, it is and he has also worn a whitechapel hoodie in the past b

    Reply
  122. Guest2 said on May 4th, 2015 at 9:39 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    Did you see the pic of her standing by the snacks with her handbag wide open? It kind of looked like she was stealing bags of chips and Cheetos and slipping then into her satchel when no one was looking. Well, except for the paparazzo. She’s a strange one for sure.

    Reply
  123. LG said on May 5th, 2015 at 1:37 am

    Been away for awhile and as usual the individuals who contribute to this site are “on the money” . “WAR OF THE ROSES”… you people are gooooood! We are heading into some interesting gossip territory.

    What makes you all fascinating is that you are a small tight knit group. You have an affiliation that slightly flies under the radar…The closeness between the main contributors is “tight” but “nice”. I just like being a support player for now. I’ve not earned my stripes ,but, for now I’m willing to admit that it is obvious I’m Team Brad and “really” because “Brad cares more”

    Reply
  124. LG said on May 5th, 2015 at 1:40 am

    Such comments probabely drive the Angelina PR machine “insane”….Hopefully Ian Halperin is protecting his contributors….er..hopefully

    Reply
  125. Guest2 said on May 5th, 2015 at 7:44 am

    @LG:
    The difference between brad and angie, in my opinion, is that she is a sociopath and he isn’t so in that regard he is the better person. He got himself into a messy situation and is stuck there because of the kids so maybe he’s trying to make the best of it. Other than that I don’t think he’s much different now than he was when married to Jen; still a stoner and now possibly an alcoholic too. They both look worn and weathered beyond their years. I wouldn’t be surprised if there is much harder drug use going on with those two.

    Reply
  126. Guest2 said on May 5th, 2015 at 5:04 pm

    OMG, has anyone seen these pics? So funny. I don’t think the photographer is a friend of hers.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=685694&sid=da98e35ecc1975aa562a5895264ffd6a&start=150

    Reply
  127. Guest2 said on May 5th, 2015 at 5:06 pm

    Ian hasn’t been on twitter since early March. He must have gone deep undercover. I noticed someone bumped up the old threads at FF and Ian’s and Morton’s brangie books. I hope we’re getting a good story soon.

    Reply
  128. LG said on May 5th, 2015 at 10:30 pm

    @Guest2:
    I agree with most of what you said. I think the only thing missing from Brad’s priviledged life was the maturity

    Reply
  129. LG said on May 5th, 2015 at 10:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    oops….in continuation…the only thing missing from Brad’s life was the maturity and wisdom gained from hardship.

    In a sense, he had a good life but was missing the soul growth gained from going through tough life situations. This happens to all of us on this planet. We all would like not to have gotten together with a certain person but in hindsight most people would say they grew from the situation.

    Having a family with Angelina has made him suffer whilst still experiencing the joy of wisdom. Children need alot of attention and the narcisstic side of Brad has had some tough lessons to learn.

    I think he has matured more than her and she is lucky to have had him be as loyal to her as he has.

    But let’s face it, men do think with their penises alot more and Angelina did whatever it took to satisfy him for awhile but her conditions and her jealousy and her need to control were too nutsy and the sex could not even make up for all the stress she created.

    I think his career will survive any fallout. Angelina’s is a bit more touch and go . She’s like the boy who cried wolf. She’s overexposed her humanitarian work which worked for her for awhile but the Hollywood community will stand by Brad.

    Obviously this is all just my opinion

    Reply
  130. sinker said on May 6th, 2015 at 4:15 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    Thanks for the link! missed that in my googlez. Maybe the Whitechapel dudes are friends of the family like ol’ marilyn manson… I can only imagine the influences.

    Did anyone see the story today about AJ/BP selling the NOLA mansion?

    Reply
  131. WC Kitty said on May 6th, 2015 at 6:26 pm

    @Guest2:
    I did! She is a strange one and maybe they really are broke! Thus, the big open bag next to the snack stand :lol: Does she actually think that she looks good in those cammies, especially being bra-less?

    Reply
  132. WC Kitty said on May 6th, 2015 at 6:40 pm

    @sinker:
    You’re welcome Sinker. To be honest, I’d never heard of that band until Maddox was pictured in that shirt and one of the band’s lyrics was posted. I’m actually quite disappointed that the shirt is part of their merchandise. Add to that, is the fact that there is so much of their merchandise up for sale! :( It is really scary to think that there are that many listeners for that kind of music! I wouldn’t be surprised if the band is actually friends of AJ.

    Thanks for the info about their New Orleans place going on the market. I read that the house unfortunately has Brad’s touch. :( The guy has no taste IMO! The article also states that the family spent a lot of time there? They did? :shock:

    Reply
  133. Guest2 said on May 6th, 2015 at 7:46 pm

    I was just reading about the sale of the NOLA home. Must be money problems. Maybe that’s why they wear the same clothes over and over. I wonder what’s going on with the chateau. Too bad the old timers are gone. Patty Anne was always great at digging up info about stuff like that. Miss you PA if you’re lurking.

    Reply
  134. Guest2 said on May 6th, 2015 at 7:48 pm

    @WC Kitty:
    Ha, that should knock an easy million off the selling price.

    Reply
  135. LG said on May 7th, 2015 at 12:50 am

    Just because I feel some pity for Pitt doesn’t mean I do not notice his inconsistant stance when it comes to the causes he promotes.

    A standout is the building of houses in New Orleans……A real humanitarian would devote a considerable amount of their time to the problems associated with the building of these homes. Construction work is complicated and needs daily attention.

    Would it not have been better to be a financial contributor to a charity doing the most good in re-building than put your name to a charity struggling to “Get It Right”

    Now that he is selling his New Orleans home it is obvious that he is extricating himself from the RESPONSIBILITY that normal people cope with and cannot and mostly, do not, run away from…It is obvious from this why he is attracting alot of critiscism….why he is called “pittiful”…are his parents and siblings so stupid and so inept that they could not warn him or was he so stubborn that he would not listen and lastly was Angelina so selfishly dominate that maintaining their intercontinental lifstyle and her emotional demaands costed Brad his attention span. Was he unable to think things through and be a person who can contribute to a cause in a functional way.

    Reply
  136. Guest2 said on May 8th, 2015 at 6:26 am

    @LG:
    The only real cause Pitt promotes is himself. Maybe Autism where he recently spoke. I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that it’s in his immediate family though I won’t elaborate further on that.

    Reply
  137. WR said on May 10th, 2015 at 3:42 am

    HAPPY MOTHERS DAY, to all of you out there who are celebrating!

    Reply
  138. Guest2 said on May 10th, 2015 at 7:31 am

    Happy mother’s day to all. Wouldn’t it be nice if IH checked in to give a little update today.

    Reply
  139. LG said on May 10th, 2015 at 11:37 pm

    @Guest2:
    I think you’re onto something. One of the Jolie-Pitt family is suffering from autism. It’s not an unusual conditon and no-one should feel embarassed by the revelation but often it means a child does not socialise well ….A disadvantage for Angelina who wants all her children to be “normal” and “paradable’..I think Pitt can handle this type of stuff better because of “family support”, ie, his own family not Angelina who is an emptiless pit of coldness and immaturity when it comes to “conditions ” that affect children.

    I always found it “telling” that Brad and Angelina timed the announcement of their loveless engagement with a trip to a museum with Pax and no other child…Pax is a child that needs attention but doesn’t get it…Angelina’s least favourite child

    Reply
  140. LG said on May 10th, 2015 at 11:39 pm

    @Guest2:
    I want to reassure Guest 2 that they did not intonate that Pax had Autism….I am the one intonating that their parental skills are in deep shit

    Reply
  141. LG said on May 10th, 2015 at 11:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    Been there done that…..I am the one going out on a limb and saying that the Jolie-Pitt children are not mentally looked after as children should be…I am not saying physically but mentally…..I think their engagement announcement in a museum with Pax spoke volumes and gallons….They’d been obviously advised that Pax received not enough one on one attention and when he did he needed alot of it and “QUALITY ATTENTION ” at that…..very hard for Angelina who has an attention deficit disorder and hard for narcissistic Brad

    Reply
  142. becca becks said on May 11th, 2015 at 9:32 am

    Ian ?? Where are you??
    It has been over a month since a new post…
    Come on….You know lots of stuff has gone down :)
    Spill it ????? Okay only in your special language,that you do so well.

    Reply
  143. Guest2 said on May 11th, 2015 at 8:21 pm

    @LG:
    I guess we don’t really know what goes on with those children but we’ve seen enough pap parades where certain of the children looked distressed. They don’t do it as much anymore but then that could be because of the new law in CA that paps can’t take pics of children unless their parents consent. So, I guess that means that angie and brad jolie-pitt consent since the faces of the children aren’t blanked out. Oh wait, I forgot they sell pics of those kids so of course the faces would show. It appears Shiloh is the money maker right now.

    Reply
  144. morris maltenburg said on May 13th, 2015 at 12:35 am

    Awwwwwwwwwwww….
    Well, well, welll……….. Town Pump Howling hole made the list of the 20 most hated douchers of hollywierdoville… along with Krunkster Kum Bag Doucher hole kartrasheapian and annal pumper PIMP BAG Krunkster JUJU head… The papz are stating that the ole pimp bag mamma is fuckering ole lamearse, her douchie dog azz daughters peen.
    of course what can you think when ole Brucie is going tranny… what a fucking weenie…
    talk about an evil skank.. the ole PIMP Kuntsterasheapian says it all
    and to top it off her dog cunt daghter cummycakes hubby …ole dickheaded peen eater Cane yeh sus just received an doctorate unhonorable doctorate from a scummy arts institute schoooll…

    bill bye the unscientific deniegher is now out making the rounds stating that monsantos gmo’s are safe and that the herbicides and pesticides up taken into the unedible plants are safe for human consumption and pumping into faggot asses.

    yet ole jolly head town pump you up in your ass with a strap on made the top 20 list. The thing that did blow up the day was that nasty butt fucking dog goopster was named the outright most hated womonkey of all the hated….
    and the papz are saying that Jelly ass fuckerston assinacuntston is preggy again for the millionhth time… and has told ole monkey fucker eddie munster peen in his butt hole to fuck off… and the very next day…ole fuckerston anistwatcunny is now moving to new jerk wad city

    Reply
  145. morris maltenburg said on May 13th, 2015 at 12:39 am

    happy motherfuckersday to all you bull dykes…. didn’t you read Kate boringfuckerheadstenn without his peen has lung cancer again….. hopefully that ole cockhead will drop dead

    Reply
  146. Keane said on May 14th, 2015 at 11:22 am

    @morris maltenburg:

    A classic post from Morris here – full of foul language, disgusting sexual terms and almost completely unintelligible to anyone but him. Oh Morris – we have missed you!

    Reply
  147. Lovah said on May 16th, 2015 at 10:43 pm

    @Keane:

    Hi Keane. I appreciate it was odd to give my email address, but I’m a tad odd. So there you go. Any how since you seem to know your stuff here is my first question, have you heard anything about Leonardo DiCaprio being into young men. I don’t want to say underage. More so, late teens. Like, how he supposedly likes his women. I had read in passing some time ago, on another gossip site that Leo was known to mess around with the local boys back when he was filming the beach in 1999/2000. I think it was in Thailand. Somewhere like that.

    Reply
  148. Keane said on May 17th, 2015 at 2:30 pm

    @Lovah:
    Hi Lovah – sorry I don’t know where you get the idea that I would know anything about this or anything else about any other A-list celebs – please can you explain?

    Reply
  149. Lovah said on May 19th, 2015 at 6:24 pm

    @Keane:

    You seem defensive. I can’t see the reason why, though. I’ve been binging on the brangelina stuff over the last month or so on here. Anyway I could see from your posts and a few others that you don’t buy into the Hollywood machinations and I low key fan girl over stuff like that. Anyway i’m interested in Leo gossip. Ian doesn’t seem to have much goss on Leo. And I get the feeling there may be something beneath that man whore rep. He was outed as gay back in the 1990’s by another actor. People seem to forget that.

    Reply
  150. Keane said on May 20th, 2015 at 8:07 am

    @Lovah:
    Yes but I don’t know anything about these people through any other source than what I can deduce from their PR tactics. Also the only people who really bother me enough for me to want to discuss them are Brangelina, primarily Angelina because she has no shame in exploiting anyone or anything for her own shallow, pathetic ends. Leonardo Dicaprio doesn’t bother me in any way – he is just an actor going about his business. Many actors are gay and decide to hide it for the sake of their career – I don’t think this is a crime unless they are fundamentally bad people. So sorry I really don’t have any interest in what Leo’s predilections are and definitely wouldn’t want to speculate about them in what I think would be a borderline libellous way. I hope you understand my position.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2015
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Meta