IUC News: Angelina Drug Photos Emerge; Papa Jon Opens Up; Restaurant of Month: 75 Main

Posted on July 8th, 2014 by HisHighness in IUC:Arts, IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

Do you think this story is a thing of the past? RADARangie

Papa Jon opens up about Angie – Independent

IUC Restaurant of the Month: Just visited the Hamptons. One of the highlights was lunch at 75 Main The cozy atmosphere was next to none as I downed one of the best burgers I’ve ever had. 75 Main is a cult worthy restaurant frequented by many celebrities. The food is intensely satisfying. The duck salad was so tender you could cut it with a butter knife. With its amiable staff, 75 Main is a cut above anywhere else in Southampton. 75main-Frontb1

****Biggest Clue of Year Coming Soon*****

  1. Dream said on July 8th, 2014 at 9:22 am

    That looks l.ike a beautiful place to eat. It looks very relaxing to me.

    I saw the first two epis of leftovers. I don’t think I will be watching any more. And whoever is doing the makeup needs to be fired. LOL seriously bad makeup on those poor people.

    Reply
  2. becca becks said on July 8th, 2014 at 12:45 pm

    A lot of drug use in her life!!!! Acknowledged by herself. What I have seen in my life time is IF the drug use stops The addictive traits come out in other areas of their lives. Watch out. We all have seen it. Scary person and she is a mother to children ? and with her background was able to adopt 3 ? children from different countries.What does that have to say about adoption? Not good as far as I am concerned. If you have enough money you can buy anything. Including fake relationships.

    Reply
  3. becca becks said on July 8th, 2014 at 12:46 pm

    The answer is NO. !!! I do not think this story “drug use” is a thing of the past.

    Reply
  4. MissCherokee said on July 8th, 2014 at 11:27 pm

    Jolie has released this tape on her own. She is getting ahead of any possible smear campaign in her bid for BEST DIRECTOR OSCAR 2015 – look at Papa Jon shilling for his daughter ” and now she’s a good director,too.”

    Jolie thought and so far rightly the media would say ” oh, it happened so long ago – nobody cares! All this does is highlights how far she came all the obstacles. She’s changed!”

    The video is phone call with her father talking about taking care of her mother. No scandal.

    THIS ‘RELEASE” HAS JOLIE ALL OVER IT. REMEMBER NO SUCH THING AS BAD NEWS – JUST WHEN PEOPLE QUIT TALKNG ABOUT YOU….

    Reply
  5. Keane said on July 9th, 2014 at 1:24 pm

    @MissCherokee:

    Agreed this is not the scandal that will rock her – we all know she did drugs. It’s the act of fraud she committed when she sold the story of the fake twins that were supposedly fathered by Brad that will topple her. Wonder how long she can keep that quiet…

    Reply
  6. anonymous said on July 9th, 2014 at 1:42 pm

    @Keane:

    “It’s the act of fraud she committed when she sold the story of the fake twins that were supposedly fathered by Brad that will topple her.”

    ROTFLMAO!!!! Oh.my.god. Are you off your meds?

    Reply
  7. Guest2 said on July 9th, 2014 at 1:55 pm

    @MissCherokee:
    I couldn’t figure out why this old news is out there again but I think you’re right about this being orchestrated by her for attention.

    Reply
  8. Keane said on July 9th, 2014 at 2:22 pm

    @anonymous:

    Sorry anonymous I’m not sure what your point is here? I can see you are trying to accuse me of being mentally ill in your usual name-calling, character-bashing style of course, but I’m not entirely sure what your argument is – care to enlighten me?

    Reply
  9. Keane said on July 9th, 2014 at 2:50 pm

    @MissCherokee:

    I think it’s part of a carefully thought out strategy of getting all her skeletons out there in order to get the public used to it and to make a clear distinction between “past Ange” and “current Ange”. It is like she is trying to make a disconnect with her former self and essentially say they are two different people so that she doesn’t have to take any responsibility for her past actions. I could see it working except for the fact that “current Ange” has so many of her own skeletons left to come out. What a shame!

    Reply
  10. angiephuxstix said on July 9th, 2014 at 3:20 pm

    GGGGGeeeeeezzzz…..whats all of that crap on my jaw????

    Reply
  11. rushdog said on July 9th, 2014 at 4:12 pm

    The drug tape doesn’t matter unless it can be connected with hard proof to Current behaviors. When it first appeared in the spring of ‘08 I wondered if it was a warning that there was more to the tape or that there were others. She built her current marketing narrative on the premise that she changed her life. If a tape or photos ever appear that proves she did not, then she’s got a problem. I don’t believe she ever changed her life and that’s why I started watching this. So, this tape is a thing of the past; the drug use…I think that’s a habit that continues.

    I believe these riddles are Ian’s way of giving an update. The photo of AJ is from the NYC premiere of The Normal Heart in May. The photo scrolls may be key: angie and 75main-Frontb1. ‘75 is her birth year.

    front – the side or a part of something that presents itself to view. Urban dictionary – put on a fake or false personality/not keeping it real.

    b1 – urban dic = smoking weed

    or brad1…brad one…brad won

    I’m leaning to the tape release as being misdirection. Follow the tape and don’t follow…. – see Ian’s previous two posts – B/JZ…Catch Miami…6/25 “On the Run” tour…HW bust…6 props… – singer lawsuit and missing dossiers..idk

    Just throwing some ideas out…

    angie 75 main front brad 1/one/won

    Reply
  12. rushdog said on July 9th, 2014 at 4:23 pm

    @Keane:
    @rushdog:
    And the tape doesn’t hurt her but has the effect that you stated and is the beginning of the drip, drip to awards season that will turn into a assiduous pounding come next January.

    Unless…this is his way of leveraging himself out of the relationship…with a “there’s more” tactic…

    Reply
  13. anonymous said on July 9th, 2014 at 5:07 pm

    @Keane:

    I think you understand all too well. Your “theory” is so whacked out and outlandish that it makes me believe you are still battling the demons you have discussed yourself.

    Any burden to prove this woman did not give birth to Brad Pitt’s babies is on you. That burden needs to include the many, many health care professionals you are suggesting conspired to bring about this so called fraud as well as all the others. I really have to believe, I really want to believe, you are just taking the piss and having a good time taking a funny jab at the Jolie. There is no way I believe you are serious unless you have “issues.”

    You get all offended when you say something completely outlandish and without basis and someone calls you on it. If you want to take such positions then expect flak. This site isn’t for sheep and I doubt Ian expects it to be.

    Reply
  14. Keane said on July 9th, 2014 at 6:40 pm

    @anonymous:

    What demons?

    Why is my “theory” so outlandish? People use surrogates and lie about it in HW all the time. People have fake relationships in HW all the time (Kim/Kanye, Jay Z/Beyonce and on and on ad infinitum). Angelina and team are so arrogant they think they can manipulate the world into believing anything – why not this?

    Why does my “burden of proof” need to include the many health care professionals who were asked to sign confidentiality contracts like everyone else around this couple? If it came to it then the question could be answered by a simple DNA test could it not?

    I am far from the only person who has spoken about the real story behind the “twins” – do they all have issues as well?

    What makes you think I am getting “all offended”? I’m simply asking you to give me an argument to back up your derision/insults/personal attacks etc – I’m sure you will be able to rise to this challenge.

    And why do you invoke Ian’s name at this stage – pal of yours is he? lol

    Reply
  15. hogsbottom said on July 9th, 2014 at 8:18 pm

    @anonymous:
    @Keane:
    Anony,
    Taking the piss!!!!…..Let me see zee papers…..quite German…..Taking the PISS!!!! hohohohohohohahahahaha
    and you
    Keany
    I always manipulate….I am the JOLLY HEAD BANGER
    Do You Remember when I would Put Electrical Tape On my NIPPY NIPS, and would wear a Dog Leash around my neck why I was Junking out?????
    I am willing to show you my PLAY MATES
    Just go to the GoOgIeS, type in Grant King John Collins Heavy Zebra and click on IMAGES. The upper left hand corner you will see their most beautiful picture…Stewey, Nigel top…then my boys with the long hard stiff schlongs….they would do me really hard together….Grant and Johnny…..I loved it when they would bugger me and do me together!!!! Those two knew how to really party!!!! Today they are OBE….you know Officers of the British Empire, and now I am a Grand Dame!!!!!

    Reply
  16. Guest1 said on July 9th, 2014 at 10:30 pm

    I don’t believe Beyoncé was ever pregnant, especially after seeing the video when she sat down in front of an interviewer and her belly imploded. The following picture of Penelope Cruz on set with a wet fake bare baby bump shows how realistic they can be.

    http://www.eonline.com/news/558229/penelope-cruz-shows-enormous-fake-baby-bump-in-a-bikini-on-ma-ma-movie-set-see-the-photo

    Reply
  17. Guest2 said on July 9th, 2014 at 11:26 pm

    @Guest1:
    She debuted her “bump” in much the same way as jolie did with the twins, for maximum attention, and just as smugly. There’s been speculation as to whether the baby is even hers, she looks just like jz, not much like bey. The more I read about this HW stuff, the more I believe that most of these relationships are fake, and all that goes with it, too.

    Reply
  18. Guest2 said on July 9th, 2014 at 11:30 pm

    Has anyone watched The Leftovers? Strange story with not very likeable characters. Theroux is really good in it and I always like Liv Tyler. I’ll watch a few more episodes to see where it goes.

    I wish more of the regulars would come back. It’s just not the same here lately. but thanks to Ian for blocking the troll (hopefully that’s what’s kept him away).

    Reply
  19. joanne said on July 10th, 2014 at 12:34 pm

    I think if you have enough money and power you can buy anything. Example http://ski.curbed.com/archives/2013/02/bill-koch-recreating-50building-old-west-town-on-his-co-ranch.php.
    Why does someone need to own a town with so many homeless? I shudder to think what goes on there.
    From the powder on holies face I would say Hollyweird needs new makeup tricks to make their “model family/mother earth” icon look decent. She looks like a druggie now.

    Reply
  20. hogsbottom said on July 10th, 2014 at 4:16 pm

    In OTHER Important REAL NEWS ….unrelated to the PHUCKERBAGS….
    The center of the country is Bracing for a very LARGE ARCTIC VORTEX that has already reduced the Central US to a -3 Degrees Centigrade lower than its annual Temps at this time, and the Temps are considered to go even lower!

    Sun Spot Activity has SERIOUSLY INCREASED, many scientists have noted M CLASS FLARES, and are CLOSELY WATCHING FOR ANY INDICATION OF ANY X CLASS FLARES. If we get hit with AN X CLASS EMP FLARE, the last thing you’ll be worrying about is going to the MOVIES, POSTING ON THIS JACKOFF SITE, or Even having a Cell Phone to talk on, you will not have electricity, no refrigeration, water, sewage processing, it will be pandemonium outright. Scientific Estimates are a MASS EXTINCTION EVENT. ONE X CLASS EMP OF HIGH ENOUGH ENERGY AND IT IS GAME OVER>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>GET IT

    This is why watching SOLAR ACTIVITY IS SO IMPORTANT, especially AS IT RELATES TO SUN SPOTS ELECTRO MAGNETIC PULSES OF THE X CLASS VARIETY.

    For those3 of you that are PROFESSIONAL SHEET DISTURBERS>>>>>ERER>>> I MEAN JOURNALISTS, Maybe itsw time that you unplug your collective BUTTS and GET YOUR HEADS OUTTA UR AZZEZS. YOU THINK YOU”RE GREAT MUTHAS….PROVE IT! NO GASOLINE< NO REFINING< NO TRUCKING DELIVERIES, EMPTY GROCERY STORE SHELVES, LIMITED MEDICINES, VERY LITTLE MEDICAL CARE, NO FIRE OR POLICE SERVICES. You sure the hell won't be worrying about JUICY BUG HEAD TINA BLOOD SUCKER BONING JELLY AZZ BUTT HEAD IN HER PIGS EYE, NO MORE GROCERY STORE RAGS!!! NO ONE WALKS AWAY!!!

    Reply
  21. WR said on July 10th, 2014 at 4:39 pm

    The great mass of humanity believes just about anything, it seems. History proves that beyond a doubt. Case in point: A certain site started calling AJ, “St. Angie”. Now, you and I already knows the label is a lie. BUT, the readers of that stuff start to believe it. Worse, AJ starts to act as if she believes it.
    Remember the “Hitlerian LIe”? You tell an outrageous lie, over and over, and the public starts to believe it’s the truth. More proof is the way the public readily identifies the actor with the character they play. Like the way they might say, “Send Chuck Norris over to the Taliban”; or some other nonsense. There’s a further line to the story, however. The Taliban also thinks the make believe hero is for real.

    And that is why some wise human beings warn us that a dictator is getting ready to arise. Apparently, we haven’t learned our history lessons.

    Reply
  22. joanne said on July 10th, 2014 at 10:41 pm

    Otherwise known as dumbing down/brainwashing.

    Reply
  23. WR said on July 10th, 2014 at 11:26 pm

    @MissCherokee:
    It sounds very plausible, indeed! We all have read about her control of the media.
    Upon further consideration, I wonder if her strategy compliments the talk about her alleged political ambitions.

    The director nom would be much harder. We remember how Ben Affleck won just about everything before and after the snub by The Directors Branch of the Academy. And Katherine Bigelow was similarly ignored, despite first-rate reviews and wins by critics orgs. And these two happen to be very talented directors.

    Reply
  24. WR said on July 10th, 2014 at 11:32 pm

    @WR:
    I did see the cover of The National Enquirer. Didn’t that rag change hands a while back? Before it did, it used to be a forceful, interesting news source. Now, it has toned down. There’s the usual AJ in danger of dying saga; with BP sweating bullets at a possible outcome.
    Don’t know if they sell; they must, otherwise why keep coming up with more.

    Reply
  25. joanne said on July 11th, 2014 at 12:21 am

    At one time the national inquire was spot on. Now its not worth putting in the bathroom.

    Reply
  26. WR said on July 11th, 2014 at 3:04 am

    Those who support AJ as a director will be happy to know that Huffington Post.com has nothing but raves, for “Unbroken”. They declare that it will be a sure thing for the next Oscar for direction. Hmmm!

    Reply
  27. WR said on July 11th, 2014 at 3:07 am

    @WR:
    Personally, I probably won’t see it. And the way the media is in her pocket, I think that’s enough for me.

    Reply
  28. HelloThere said on July 11th, 2014 at 10:48 am

    75 Main is not in Bridgehampton, it’s in Southampton. Just a mistake or part of a riddle?

    Reply
  29. hogsbottom said on July 11th, 2014 at 1:07 pm

    @WR:
    WR,
    The Media used to be the primary protection to the People in Days Gone By!!
    No longer!!!

    Reply
  30. hogsbottom said on July 11th, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    So what About Juicy Tina Bug Phucker and his HOSEBAg jelly aZZ BUTTPHUCKER HEAd, AND THE ADAPTATIONS OF lEFT bEHIND….WHICH WAS NEVER HIS WORK

    Reply
  31. Keane said on July 11th, 2014 at 1:25 pm

    So the leak was designed to drum up publicity for her new film right? Got it!

    Reply
  32. Deanne said on July 11th, 2014 at 2:20 pm

    @WR:

    Yes, and the same thing was said about ITLOBAH, it was a sure thing for Best Foreign Language Film and that Jolie was going to be nominated as best director. It was pumped up for months. When the movie finally came out, the critic reviews were so-so, and the movie bombed at the box office.

    I am waiting for the over hype of Fury, it will start soon that this will be the movie that GIVES Pitt that Best Actor Oscar. It happens every movie he has coming out, like he’s the only actor in Hollywood.

    Reply
  33. Petuniapoofylicious said on July 11th, 2014 at 2:59 pm

    @Deanne:
    Yes the PITIFUL SCUMPHUCKERSUCKER thinks far to much of himself. You would think that if he was so good that he would just keep his haggit FAGGOT mouth shut, and await for the PRAISE TO BE HEAPED UPON HIM!!!

    Reply
  34. Petuniapoofylicious said on July 11th, 2014 at 3:03 pm

    @Deanne:
    YES The FURY of HAGGIT FAGGOTS….OH I’LL GET MARRIED WHEN EVERYONE ELSE CAN…..NEXT WE WILL HAVE A PERSON STATING, I AM IN LOVE WITH THIS TREE, AND WE NEED TO GET MARRIED, OR I LOVE MY DOG AND WE NEED TO GET MARRIED, OR I LOVE THIS COW AND WE NEED TO GET MARRIED…………..
    WHEN AND HOW DOES IT END???????

    Reply
  35. Petuniapoofylicious said on July 11th, 2014 at 3:06 pm

    THE JOLLY HEAD BANGER BUYING A GROCERY STORE RAG….. NOT THAT ISN’T ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS BECAUSE IT REALLY IS!!! THE SIGNS OF DESPERATION, BUYING A GROCERY STORE RAG FOR RELEVANCY. TO STAY IN THE PUBLIC.S EYE.

    Reply
  36. Petuniapoofylicious said on July 11th, 2014 at 3:18 pm

    THESE TWO HAGGIT FAGGOT BEARDING HEADBANGERS ARE NEVER GOING TO MARRY EACH OTHER. TALK ABOUT MANIPULATIVE SCAMMING, THIS IS JUST SO OVER THE TOP IT ISN’T FUNNY!!!

    I WAS ACTUALLY SURPRISED ABOUT ITLOBH, BECAUSE I THOUGHT SHE WOUL HAVE GOTTEN NAILED. I BELIEVE THE SAME IS TRUE FOR JUICY BUGPHUCKER TINA, ADAPTING LEFT BEHIND. THE REASON THAT TURD BAG DID THAT IS THAT IT HAS A TREMENDOUS FOLLOWING, THERE ARE 13 BOOKS, NUMEROUS DVDS, AND SHEETHEAD DIRT BAG IS ATTEMPTING TO RIP OFF THIS MARKET LIKE HE IS SOME GREAT PERSON. WHERE IS THAT SASQUATCH CHEWBACA NOW? LETS HEAR OLE SASQUATCH DEFEND HER RIP OFF HEROS NOW. JELLY AZZ BUG PHUCKERHEAD IS NO DIFFERENT THAN PHUCKSTICK THE TOWNPUMP JUNKIE. THEY ARE TWO RIP OFF CUNNYS. BOTH FLAMING FAME HOING HOLES.

    Reply
  37. hogsbottom said on July 11th, 2014 at 3:42 pm

    whats even funnier is how that bugphuckerhead Juicy Tina used to be an admitted dumpster diver. Ole Jelly Azz Butthumping Phuckerhead and her SAQUATCH CHEWMYTURDSBACA AND HER BULL DYKE EVIL DEGENERATE, AND HIS GOOD BUDDY UNCLE RATFACERATHEAD RETRORETARD ALL DROP DEAD AND LEAVE I FOR ONE WILL BE VERY HAPPY!!!!

    Reply
  38. Guest2 said on July 11th, 2014 at 4:34 pm

    @Deanne:
    Those two really are made for each other. Birds of a feather.

    Reply
  39. hogsbottom said on July 11th, 2014 at 5:07 pm

    @Guest2:
    Ohhh…Yes G@…
    OLE JellyAzz Buttphucher Juicy BUTT hole TINA and their alter ego PHUCKSTIC TOWN PUMP JUNKIE PITIFUL SCUMMER are the perfect MATCH for eac other…. THEY CAN CORN HOLE AWAY……

    HERE is the point lame azz… They live off of everyone else like the dirt holes they truly are!!! All are RIP OFF Thieves and PLAGIARISTS . They all like to glad hand each other. juicy TINA doesn’t have a unique thought in his head, that’s exactly why he adapted and co-opted the LEFT BEHIND SERIES, it has a built in market. This is no different then KATIE THE CUNT starting out as a supposed CHRISTIAN SINGER to turn into a flaming flamer fame whore fame ho loose azz phuck hole who married RUSSEL THE DOUCHER Brabd… and the started riding the schlong COCKSUCKER HEAD JOHNNY EAT YOUR SHEET MAYOR….. The rula of your cunny!!!! You just cannot handle the truth….if you could you would be eating yards of their turds to get at where it came from…………….
    Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Reply
  40. WCKitty said on July 11th, 2014 at 5:56 pm

    @Guest2:
    Do you still go over to FF? I was reading some of the posts over there and one reminded of one of Ian’s past clues – the one with the missing laptop. There are some posters that are saying that there is more video tape out there. So maybe she leaked the tape on purpose (wouldn’t put it past her despite her children) or is she cross the wrong person?

    Reply
  41. Guest2 said on July 11th, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Yes, I still go there and I saw the posts you’re referring to though I never tied any of it in to the missing laptop clue. Maybe we should re-visit those clues. Some at FF were speculating it was pitt who did it and one nut case is blaming it on jen aniston. I wondered if jolie released it so that she could sue the daily mail for money. But it could be that someone is sending her a warning to toe the line or worse will come out. Or they’re blackmailing her. There are so many possibilities as to who released the tape and why that it’s impossible to even guess at the truth.

    Reply
  42. WR said on July 11th, 2014 at 9:40 pm

    @Deanne:
    I did see a preview of the new BP movie. He looked like a kid all dressed up in a service uniform, playing grown-up. It was like when kids put on grown-ups clothes. But that was a preview. Will wait for the critics.
    Usually more than 5 really great performances vie for the noms.

    There was another article about BP. He re-iterates his previous whining that married life with Jennifer was boring, boring, boring. And that he now happier than he’s ever been in his life.
    Well, at 50, with his hair turning white, he’s not going to be a stud, that’s for sure. And if he is so happy in his current state, why dig up his previous comments about his married life? When one is happily in love, one forgets about one’s previous unhappiness, and doesn’t mention it because of their current happy state.
    Have a sneaky feeling that a certain party doesn’t want JA to be happy; instead he wants JA to be miserable and pining for her “lost love”.
    It’s the “Legend in his own mind” thing.

    Reply
  43. WR said on July 11th, 2014 at 9:43 pm

    @WR:
    Saw a recent photo of GC and BP. Their chemistry is very strong! Stronger than BP and AJ, imo! No wonder there were earlier reports that AJ didn’t want GC around.

    Reply
  44. joanne said on July 11th, 2014 at 10:19 pm

    All this drama and Aniston looks the best. I said this years ago. AJ did JA a favor.

    Reply
  45. Jaded said on July 12th, 2014 at 2:05 pm

    Me thinks the four “Let’s go skinny dipping!” nonads over on the top right are clues.

    Reply
  46. MissCherokee said on July 12th, 2014 at 7:36 pm

    Yeah, some the fat loons sitting in their government housing somewhere in Essex hoping that St. Angelina will adopt them on – love to bang on about how Angelina had the twins. yeah, okay. Don’t stop believing – at least you can live vicariously through the horse sh*t uneducated Jolies shovels.

    Reply
  47. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2014 at 5:43 pm

    Where did everyone go? Has anyone noticed all the negative stories and blind reveals on jen and justin lately? Seems jolie and her minions are working overtime to trash them and it wouldn’t surprise me if she is behind the clooney tabloid story. I wonder what’s up with her.

    Reply
  48. Keane said on July 14th, 2014 at 6:54 pm

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/10967386/Reshuffle-William-Hague-quits-as-a-dozen-ministers-axed.html

    No more hanging with the British Foreign Secretary for our Ange…

    Reply
  49. Keane said on July 14th, 2014 at 6:59 pm

    The Daily Mail clearly aren’t too keen on Ange right now either – classic!

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html

    Reply
  50. Keane said on July 14th, 2014 at 7:16 pm

    @Keane:

    I honestly think it was the Angelina connection wot dun it. He was more interested in hanging out with his HW pals than doing what he was supposed to do in office. And the damehood made him look like an unmitigated fool. Angelina Jolie = political poison. Enuff said!

    Reply
  51. WR said on July 14th, 2014 at 8:58 pm

    @Keane:
    I so agree! When he was instrumental in giving her that recognition, the title lost its lustre for many of us. All those women who received that honor, must have cringed at the very thought of it going to a celebrity of minor distinction.

    They are stuck with what the British Foreign Secretary has wrought. Now, how to distance themselves from such an embarrassment? JMO!

    Reply
  52. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2014 at 10:09 pm

    @Keane:
    Thanks for bringing that over. He is a fool for sure. I wonder what (or who) she’ll do next.

    Reply
  53. Keane said on July 15th, 2014 at 8:24 am

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2692244/He-hob-nobbed-Angelina-Hague-quits-star-role-Hammond-named-new-Foreign-Secretary.html

    Yep, the photo opps with Ange spelled the end of his political career for sure.

    Reply
  54. Deanne said on July 15th, 2014 at 11:26 am

    Is Angelina Jolie a succubus? Seriously anyone that gets involved with her, ends up on the losing side of the stick. From directors, who’s careers have never been the same after working with her, to men who’s career has never been the same, since hooking up with her. Men who have co-starred with her in movies, who’s careers or private lives implode after being around her, (ie Billy Bob Thornton,Johnny Depp, Ethan Hawke and her own brother James Haven) Women avoid her like the plague, for more than one reason, and because we are intuitive beings.

    I don’t believe Hague “quit”. I believe he was forced to resign his position, which in essence he was FIRED. I think it was partially due to the fact while the world was imploding, William Hague acted like a silly little school boy with a crush, and Brad and Angelina acted like they were at a Hollywood premiere, by their posturing, pimping and priming like on a “red carpet” movie premiere, at the rape summit. It was tasteless, tacky and totally unacceptable, given the severe nature of this summit. I also believe the other reason why William Hague was forced to resign, is that shit is going to hit the fan in the UK over that pedophile ring., and the PM doesn’t want the stink of that on him.

    Reply
  55. Keane said on July 15th, 2014 at 12:47 pm

    @Deanne:

    You are totally right with all you have said there. There is no question that Hague was fired. I think if Angelina Jolie wants to look like a sincere politician/humanitarian, she might need to take a few more acting classes first. Oh and I think perhaps timing these events so that they don’t coincide with promotional duties for one film and the release of another (even trying to link the themes of the summit and one of her films together in a totally shameless way) might help her cause. Meanwhile our government knows it is about to go under as you say – hence the firing of all the old boys who might be tainted by the scandal and the promotion of women whose gender and age Cameron hopes will prevent them from being associated with it. I think it is far too little too late though and the shit is about to hit the fan in the UK as you say and the Conservatives will be toast at the next election and possibly for many decades to come. Bet Ange is pleased she got her undeserved title in while she could!

    Reply
  56. joanne said on July 15th, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    Jolie taints another. This woman is poison to actors and politicians everywhere.

    Reply
  57. becca becks said on July 15th, 2014 at 2:55 pm

    Lots of blind items out about JA and JT.
    ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 07/03 **#7**
    This B list talk show host had a falling out with her actress best friend because of an incident with the boyfriend of the actress and a hot tub and some nudity. Chelsea Handler/Jennifer Aniston (Justin Theroux)

    Reply
  58. becca becks said on July 15th, 2014 at 2:59 pm

    MR. X 07/11 **PART 2**
    4) What A-list mostly movie actress who got her start on TV can’t have any kids because of those two abortions she had during her first marriage? Jennifer Aniston

    ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 07/11 **#4**
    This B list mostly television actor on a new hit show and has an A list actress girlfriend looked great yesterday for an interview considering he had been doing lines an hour earlier at an all night party. Justin Theroux

    Reply
  59. Guest2 said on July 15th, 2014 at 5:12 pm

    @becca becks:
    There’s another nasty one about Theroux and Terry Richardson sharing young models. Interesting that these are all coming out about the same time as someone else’s drug den video.

    Reply
  60. Deanne said on July 15th, 2014 at 6:37 pm

    @Keane:

    I wonder, now that Mr. Hague has lost his very powerful position in the UK, will Jolie continue her liaison with Mr. Hague? Or has he used his purpose? She got her “Dame” title, she got herself on the world stage at the summit, she got her picture taken with Camilla, another home-wrecker. Something tells me after reading up about Phillip Hammond, that Jolie won’t be able to use her feminine wiles, on him, or that he would be easily impressed or duped by a two bit Hollywood celebrity. But hey, I could be wrong…..

    Keane, what do you think of Phillip Hammond??

    Reply
  61. Guest1 said on July 15th, 2014 at 8:24 pm

    @becca becks:
    Thank you for posting the blind items, many I have read from their original source. But some of them I have
    read have not been solved. Aniston has only been married once, so the blind stating “during her first marriage” does not make sense. Are you getting the solved items from another website? Personally I question any blind item from CDAN or blindgossip, or any site for that matter.

    As Guest2 stated, there have been a lot of negative stories and blind reveals on jen and justin lately. You have to wonder who is behind them. Actually, I think we know who is!

    Reply
  62. rushdog said on July 15th, 2014 at 11:26 pm

    So he leaves the position of foreign secretary (resigns before he’s fired, basically) to become a “special representative”…please!!! I believe the issue referenced below is important, but this is a cover. From the beginning I felt the summit was created as a misdirection.
    ————————————-

    “I’m delighted that William Hague has been appointed the Prime Minister’s Special Representative on Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict, and to see the UK’s continuing leadership on this issue,” said Jolie in a statement provided to the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    “William and I are now very much focused on the next stage of our campaign. We will be asking countries to live up to the promises they made at the London Summit to End Sexual Violence in Conflict, and working alongside them in that effort,” she added.

    “We are both absolutely committed to this cause and to our partnership on this issue.”

    Reply
  63. rushdog said on July 15th, 2014 at 11:29 pm

    http://ianundercover.com/2013/03/14/iuc-key-clue-and-jesus-said/

    2005-2013 – money laundering and sex scandals…..

    Reply
  64. Keane said on July 16th, 2014 at 6:34 am

    @Deanne:

    Hey Deanne, I don’t know much about Phillip Hammond but I do know that there will be no way any Foreign Secretary will be repeating the mistake of being seen to hobnob with Hollywood fluff while the Middle East began to implode even further and thousands more people lost their lives. Hague is known for PR gaffes in this country but this was his worst yet. The re-vamped Conservative government will want no association with the likes of Jolie – it wants to stand a fighting chance of getting re-elected next year!

    Reply
  65. anonymous said on July 16th, 2014 at 12:26 pm

    Except both David Cameron and Phillip Hammond have happily associated themselves with Angelina Jolie and her work. When will it dawn on you that the world does not share your irrational interpretations and hate of this woman?

    Reply
  66. Deanne said on July 16th, 2014 at 1:44 pm

    @anonymous:

    What “work”?? She isn’t going to solve anything. She holds no office, she holds no power. She is a puppet for the UN. A look pretty, make speeches that were written for her, opportunistic PR whore. That is it in a nutshell. There will be NO fixing rape in conflict, as there will never be fixing the refugee problem that has existed since the beginning of time, and STILL exists today, and WILL exist until the Earth is gone.

    I don’t hate Angelina Jolie, I just see through her BULLSHIT. As for David Cameron and Phillip Hammond and the rest, they like anyone else are just playing along and giving lip service.

    Reply
  67. anonymous said on July 16th, 2014 at 3:52 pm

    Pessimism and cynicism never solved anything.

    No one speaks of another person with such bile unless there is hate. Which is, in the end, an incredible waste of time and energy.

    Reply
  68. Deanne said on July 16th, 2014 at 4:35 pm

    @anonymous:

    Neither do photo ops and speeches.

    Reply
  69. Deanne said on July 16th, 2014 at 4:39 pm

    @anonymous:

    BTW, tell me ONE thing, that Angelina Jolie has done in her entire 14 yrs of being a UN puppet, that has changed any of those refugees lives, for the better. They ones in Syria, Iran, Iraq, Bosnia, etc. What has she done PERSONALLY, and I am not talking about announcing a donation, either. I am talking about her own back breaking work. Instead of doing a photo-op with refugees, to bring “awareness” to their plight, while she is the front of center of the pictures.

    Reply
  70. Keane said on July 16th, 2014 at 4:50 pm

    @anonymous:

    Yes David Cameron has associated himself with a few people who will do for him at the next election, Rebekah Brooks being another one. For someone with a background in PR he has sure as hell misjudged his own political image. His closeness to Rebekah Brooks as revealed by the Leveson enquiry and Hague’s swanning around with Jolie and Pitt who looked to all intents and purposes like they were attending the premiere of their latest film while the middle east went into meltdown are images that will be indelibly marked on the consciousness of the British electorate forever. And now news that Margaret Thatcher’s government not only harboured a paedophile ring but protected perpetrators from prosecution? Time to say sayonara David I’m afraid, your time in government is up, this country will never re-elect you.

    Reply
  71. Deanne said on July 16th, 2014 at 5:24 pm

    I imagine that anonymous is busy googling to find ONE thing that Angelina Jolie has done to change the lives of refugees.

    My respect is for those REAL humanitarians, the ones that gave up their own lives to help others. Doctors without Borders, Peace Corps, etc. Those are the true HERO’S of this world. Those people that live each day in the “trenches”, supplying food, water, medical care, etc. Those are the ones that should be getting honorary awards, etc. But then again, they aren’t looking for adulation, awards, or adoration. They do it because it comes from the heart. That is what true humanitairism is. Not some 2 bit celebrity who flies into these places on her private plane, stay at 5 star hotel, have bodyguards all around her, a makeup and hair dresser, to make herself look presentable for her close-ups from her private photographer, spend enough time in the area, getting her picture taken, only to be zipped away in her luxury SUV, back to the 5 star hotel, to board her private jet, back to her multi-million dollar mansion.

    Reply
  72. Keane said on July 16th, 2014 at 5:54 pm

    @Deanne:

    Agreed – and I don’t think that this has ever been so apparent than during that summit. Angelina swanned in and swanned out with a retinue of staff like it was just one of many stops on her promotional tour for Maleficent, pausing only long enough to scoop up her honorary damehood and beat it the hell out of there back to her mansion in LA. What a hero!

    And agreed also with who is much more deserving of an honour. I add to that the journalists who risk their lives on a daily basis to report on the many war zones around the world – dodging many a bullet and a shell and witnessing atrocities every day with little or no thought for their personal glory to shed light on the world’s darkest corners. I wonder if Dame Jolie-Pitt could handle that?

    Reply
  73. Deanne said on July 16th, 2014 at 6:39 pm

    @Keane:

    Keane, I don’t know about the crime statistics in the UK. However, in the USA a woman is raped every 2 minutes here. She thinks that her flowery words, or some kind of contract is going to stop rape in conflict?
    PPFFFT. This is her new go to mantra…and that is all it is. She knows damn well nothing is ever going to stop it…just like her refugee cause, will never end. She picks these “campaigns” as a way and means to draw attention to herself. To have the world think this is this Masters of the Universe, or the second coming of Mother Theresa mixed with Princess Diana and add a bit of Audry Hepburn. At least those 3 women accomplished something. Jolie will never accomplish anything.

    IF she is so good at saving the world, why doesn’t she help stop crime right in her own back yard? L.A. is a cesspool of crime. I am not talking about the part where million dollar mansions are located, but the gutter part that is L.A.

    Reply
  74. Siska said on July 16th, 2014 at 7:19 pm

    @becca becks:
    And there was picture of Jen, justin,Chelsea n cox in the same event got along fine…
    I never believe 100% off that blind stuff!lai just take with grain of salt! he,he

    Reply
  75. Keane said on July 16th, 2014 at 7:30 pm

    @Deanne:

    I know the whole premise is absolutely ridiculous – as if the world’s most vile human beings are going to stop and think for a moment before committing atrocities because Angelina Jolie read out a speech someone had written for her at a conference! If she wanted to do some real good for others she would target a sector of the world she may actually have some sway over – like people in the US. And as you say there are some real problems in her own backyard that could do with being fixed – crime rates, homelessness, the list goes on – but none of that quite has the globe-trotting, I’m saving-the-world one photo pop at a time glamour that Jolie is going for does it? And woe betide if she ever got her hands dirty and did something other than talk to people, get her photo taken and give a speech. I have never even seen her with a hair our of place, let alone a smudge of dirt on her face. Do you think she has any concept that people who do humanitarian work full-time actually get hot and dirty and uncomfortable and are afraid and stressed and traumatised on a daily basis and for little or no reward? No, she has no idea, because the only work she has ever done in her life is the fun stuff, acting, modelling or whatever, getting free clothes from Gucci and trying every drug under the sun. The prospect of even doing a regular job like working in law enforcement or working with homeless people not just for a mater of days or weeks but every day and every week year in year out with no time to go hang in her house in Cambodia would absolutely kill her. But she still thinks she is entitled to that damehood and was shameless enough to accept it when there are hundreds of thousands more deserving people in the UK alone. And for that I say shame on you Angelina, shame on you!

    Reply
  76. Deanne said on July 16th, 2014 at 8:11 pm

    @Keane:

    When she accepted her “Honorary Oscar Award”…I would of thought she would of made mention the thousands of people in the world that are volunteering, and helping those most unfortunate. Of course not, her speech was all about HER. Her life. Her impressions. HER feelings. HER family. Not one acknowledgement went out to those people, living, breathing, sacrificing, their lives at all, each and every day….

    As a retired RN, I have seen my share of the atrocities that human beings could do to another. I have stories that would curl your toes. When I decided to retire I was burned out after 30 yrs. The last patient that came through our ER department, well that was it. It was a 2 yr old toddler who’s father raped and beat her till she was almost dead, we saved that little girl. That was it…right in that moment I knew I had to get out of there…I put my resignation in that morning. I now do some occasional home nursing, mostly for friends or family, which is usually hospice care…..but I can’t be in a controlled situation like a hospital anymore. I also, volunteer at a domestic abuse complex. I have 4 children, all grown now, but IF anyone were to put their hands on MY child, they best run, cause this Momma Grizzly’s claws will come out.

    Reply
  77. Deanne said on July 16th, 2014 at 8:28 pm

    Hey Anonymous, found anything yet, that you can report back to me??

    State ONE thing that Angelina has done, to make those refugees lives any better.

    You can’t:
    1. State the amount she has donated, that is easy anyone can write a check.
    2. State she brings “awareness” when most of the educated population already know the atrocities that are happening around the world.

    I’ll patiently await your answer…….

    Reply
  78. WR said on July 17th, 2014 at 3:03 am

    Thank you, ladies, for saying what many people feel but don’t have the ability to put it into words to their satisfaction.

    What stands out for me in all this charity chic, is the lack of parenting for those six kids. There’s the occasional photo-ops. But kids need full time nurturing. Neglecting ones parental duties seems to me a form of child abuse. No hitting involved, but a much needed warmth and closeness is missing. I hope the nannies are the motherly types.

    Reply
  79. WR said on July 17th, 2014 at 3:13 am

    Well, the summer months are rapidly coming to an end. No wedding bells, so far. How long has the engagement been?
    Will Georgie put the ring on Amal’s finger?
    Maybe Brangelina could join them in a group wedding. The tabs would go wild! AJ would be in her element!
    Even more fascinating, would be the possible participation of JV as the minister. And the six kids holding baskets of fresh flowers, and strewing the petals in the aisle.
    I’d put my hands together for that!

    Reply
  80. WR said on July 17th, 2014 at 3:17 am

    @WR:
    Remember Hugh Grant’s character in “Sense and Sensibility”? Well, picture BBT looking on at the wedding described above from afar!

    Reply
  81. WR said on July 17th, 2014 at 3:18 am

    @WR:
    Seriously though, the trouble in the Middle East is getting more of us alarmed!

    Reply
  82. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2014 at 9:03 am

    Did Ian just post this: ****Biggest Clue of Year Coming Soon*****?

    I wish more of the old timers would come back :(

    Reply
  83. Deanne said on July 17th, 2014 at 9:06 am

    @WR:

    When Jolie made the statement that she wanted to adopt her kids, as pairs, so that each one had someone they could look at, and resemble, I knew then that Ms. Jolie was doing nothing short of picking out shoes to match her purse. She even stated she adopted Pax as a play thing for Maddox.

    She got knocked up to seal the deal with Pitt. Shiloh was going to be the one that kept Pitt in line. When Pitt finally figured out she was batshitcrazy, she got herself some twins. (I still don’t believe she birthed those twins). I believe she may of been pregnant with Viv, however she bought Knox somewhere else.. Picture evidence has shown me that it was a calculated move on her part. Remember those “twins” were not seen for over a year, after their “birth”, and their “cover” on People magazine. She could of used any new born, to put in place with those pictures. Holly’s newborn??

    Those kids are just extensions of Jolie’s. It gave her super fame, adulation from the public. Even today in EVERY article written about her, the writer uses the “Mother of 6″, in their columns. She cares no more about them kids then she does those refugees. All it is for Jolie is a means to an end. They are being raised by a bunch of nannies. Jolie hasn’t given up her lifestyle for those kids. She even stated she wasn’t going to.

    When Pitt and Jolie went to London for that summit, they left 4 kids home. Two kids, Maddox and Zahara joined their parents. But the 4 kids were left home with their nannies. What kind of parents do that?? Maddox went to London to see his g/f. He is freaking 12 yrs old! At 12 yrs old, my sons were into playing baseball, football, soccer, etc, they were NOT interested in dating girls. None of my kids were even allowed to date until they were 16, and the first dates had to be chaperoned!

    I know this is going off topic a bit, but just yesterday in the news, another celebrities kid, John McEnroe’s son was busted for buying/selling drugs. Almost every day this year alone, some celebrities kid is being arrested. This, unfortunately this is what I believe is going to happen to the Jolie-Pitt kids. They will end up having to much time and money on their hands, and without any kind of stability, no formal education, and being taught properly, we will see these kids as tabloids fixtures when they are old enough to be out on their own. You watch, when Maddox is 16 and has his drivers license, he is going to get a very shiny new sports car. When he’s 18, after having no formal education, but he’ll have a nice tidy trust fund, he’ll end up blowing through it, and resorting to illegal activities when he’s in his twenties.

    Reply
  84. Deanne said on July 17th, 2014 at 1:17 pm

    @Guest2:

    Well personally, I check in from time to time, but that last post, with that one poster, that was here to just more or less disrupt the board, and was allowed to do it, kept me from posting. I’m glad Ian finally got rid of it, however, it’ll just make a new name and come back once again…

    I also think if Ian was more engaged with the posters here, and let us know whether or not we are close to guessing these clues, that more posters would come back. After awhile, of us constantly going around in circles trying to guess and having no feedback, then people just got bored with it all,and left.

    Now he put that “Biggest clue of the year, coming soon”, which could mean, tomorrow, next week or next month. That is another thing that has rubbed people the wrong way. Instead of just announcing another BIG CLUE COMING, just post the damn thing!

    This all comes from a place of love, Ian. :)

    Reply
  85. Keane said on July 17th, 2014 at 3:22 pm

    Terrible news from Israel/Palestine and the Ukraine. We live in scary times. Thoughts and prayers are with family and friends of the victims.

    Reply
  86. WR said on July 17th, 2014 at 3:23 pm

    @Deanne:
    Yes, some of us envisioned that scenario regarding the kids, early on. And this was based on their self-serving proclamations. Seems every new day produced a new lie. “I’m going to retire to raise a family” is one that kept the righteous fans at bay. All very calculating.

    But there was the recent proclamation by poor BP, that his marriage was so boring! boring! boring!
    Now, a wise teacher told his class of 50 males of all ages. ‘IF YOU’RE BORED, IT’S BECAUSE YOU’RE BORING!”
    Plain and simple.

    Reply
  87. WR said on July 17th, 2014 at 3:28 pm

    Check the news about another Malaysian plane going down. This time it’s location is Ukraine. Much speculation going on, and they’re recommending the country makes contact with experts from various countries, including Britain, France, Australia and the USA.

    Apparently 295 people perished. Some are sure there was a missile involved in the huge mid-air explosion. Evidence is scattered in miles-long areas.

    Again, our prayers were sent for the benefit of the survivors left behind.

    Reply
  88. Deanne said on July 17th, 2014 at 6:41 pm

    @WR:

    Well the timing of his little statements about him being bored in his marriage, came about the time when Jennifer was in a solid, happy, loving relationship. Before then, she was a tabloid staple saying how she is still hung up on Brad, or how she couldn’t keep a man in her life, etc. I think Brad enjoyed seeing the media play their games on her..and it made him feel superior….but things changed drastically, he honestly didn’t think Jennifer was ever going to find love again, and would pine away for him the rest of her life. Or he saw it that way. I think it disturbed him that she did indeed find someone. Someone more attractive, well built, well educated, more talented, and it screwed with his head. That is why he had to take a couple pot-shots at her, he was wanting a response from her. She didn’t give him the satisfaction. When she was asked to respond to what he said.. she just more or less told the interviewer that it wasn’t important. As in HE isn’t important.

    The man spent better part of their marriage on a couch smoking pot. It wasn’t HER place to entertain him, as she had a JOB on Friends and was making movies. I’m sure he’s now living a very interrrresssttting life. As much as one can, while living with a pyscho baby mama, 6 screaming, spoiled, unruly kids, constant traveling, that would make anyone old very fast, and having to self medicate himself to get through each and every day of it!

    Reply
  89. deliteriousDILATANTE said on July 17th, 2014 at 10:39 pm

    @Deanne:
    I guess you girls don’t like that guy do you? He is a bit unnerving. From my experience its because of Scientology. Everyone I know that has ever had the smallest involvement with them ends up disliking them.

    Reply
  90. WR said on July 18th, 2014 at 2:48 am

    @Deanne:
    So true. So many telling moments. The earliest comment I read about him was comparing himself to Paul Newman. Paul Newman was no pretty face. He couldn’t pass for a woman. He could portray a manly man. He could act a difficult role like Cool Hand Luke. He had the manly appeal to women that the stars of the classical era had.
    That was when I first read from a critic, that “BRAD PITT IS A LEGEND IN HIS OWN MIND!”
    There are photos still available where he has that expectant smile on his face, as he waits for the applause from crazed fans, which he seems sure will flood him, momentarily.

    I agree that JT is much more of a catch for JA. He is manly, for one. Today, a site I use, Yahoo, broke the news that a certain actress admitted on tv, that she couldn’t help but look at JT’s manhood. Now, she, JA certainly wouldn’t be bored by a younger, better looking dude than her boring ex, no?
    JMO!

    Reply
  91. WR said on July 18th, 2014 at 2:53 am

    More sad news about the destroyed Malaysian plane. It was reported that approx. 100 Aids scientists and Aids workers were on their way to an Australian conference. What a set-back!
    The co-discoverer of the Aids virus, expressed her deep sorrow over in France.

    Reply
  92. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2014 at 9:39 am

    @WR:
    “BRAD PITT IS A LEGEND IN HIS OWN MIND!”. That sums it all up for me and it’s the reason I don’t like him. He appeared to be more humble when he was with Jen and he had a sense of humor back then. Though I never cared for him as an actor at least he was likeable in intereviews. Now he’s just a pretentious bore.

    Reply
  93. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2014 at 9:48 am

    @Deanne:
    You’re not the first to say that. I hope Ian is listening and changes things up here. It’s the only site where I feel comfortable posting. FF is intimidating wth all the crazy loons, worst than anything I’ve seen here and we’ve had some vile loons here in the past. That site isn’t what it used to be either. Maybe it’s just that people have lost interest in the brand now that they’re getting long in the tooth and have become boring, saying the same things over and over. Their shamelessness has reached new heights though. I still can’t get over their brazen behavior at that rape summit. Hague got what he deserved.

    Reply
  94. Deanne said on July 18th, 2014 at 10:42 am

    @WR:

    Remember when he showed up to a movie premiere, looking like Robert Redford? Reddish hair, mustache, glasses, a 70’s look complete with a brown leather jacket?? Then the media was comparing him to Robert Redford??

    As this time, Brad was trying to move away from his “pretty boy image” and be seen as a great actor. The thing is, that you can take on the persona of another great actor, make yourself look like a great actor, it doesn’t mean you are a great actor. Pitt is not a great actor.

    Pitt started believing his own hype, and became that pretentious bore that Guest 2, said above. However his lackluster box office continues to this day. He has had a few profitable movies, when he is in an ensemble of other talented actors, however, when he is the headliner those movies don’t make a profit.

    Pitt has now moved onto producing movies, knowing that his time in front of a camera is waning. Now he’s picking Oscar bait movies, because he knows that is the only recognition he can receive from the academy. He will never win a Best Actor/Supporting Actor award. It’s all about awards for him. He wants/needs that recognition to prove to himself that he is the greatest thing that happened to Hollywood.

    His relationship with Jolie, brought him more fame, power, and prestige in Hollywood that he never had before. Their publicity team, along with certain bloggers with the help of family members, made him into a superstar. He reveled in it. He still revels in it. However, Hollywood and the media is a tricky place, where you can be on top one minute and they can tear you down the next. As they say, your only as good as your last movie.

    Paramount fired Pitt. We still don’t know exactly how much this is going to effect Pitt. It just happened at the beginning of this year. The media of course downplayed it because Pitt already had a back up plan, New Regency. However, not one film has come into production with his new partners. Although, Pitt and Paramount still had a few movies that were under contract together, WWZ-2, Selma, and The Lost City of Z, Paramount will not allow Pitt to have a blank check and run gamut over the production he did with WWZ.

    I’ve said this before and I will state it again, once Pitt knows that his connection to Jolie is no longer profitable, that “Brangelina” are not money makers, he will be gone. It doesn’t matter if they have 6 kids…he will leave the relationship. Jolie is becoming more famous than he. He couldn’t stand it when Jennifer was making more money, more famous, and making more movies than him, so he sabotaged his marriage to her, by having an affair. However, if he tries to do this to Jolie, he will find that he can’t shake her as easily as he did Jennifer. Cheating won’t be the catalyst that breaks them up….

    Although I find it hilarious that Pitt’s produced movie Selma is now opening on the same day as Jolie’s Unbroken. Ava DuVernay, is an award winning director. Jolie is going to be in competition with this woman, come award season. Did Pitt help in sabotaging his “partners” chances at the Oscars?? Remember 12 Yrs a Slave, took home the Best Movie Oscar, last year, and the movie sites are stating that this movie, about Dr. Martin Luther King, will be in competition for Best Movie of the year.

    If Pitt’s movie wins over Jolie’s movie, I can foresee a break-up happening. That competition that kept them together, will the the one thing that tears them apart.

    Reply
  95. WR said on July 18th, 2014 at 2:40 pm

    @Deanne:
    I agree that AJ will not be one to be stepped over. She has too much on BP. This would include private information, photos, tapes, etc! This could be “mysteriously” leaked to the media, by her partners in the biz. Now that Disney has a big hit with “Maleficent”, she has new supporters who will protect her.
    My feeling is that they will be over, when she says it’s over.

    I agree with the way he has his eye on Oscar in producing his movies. The movie that critics hated, the Benjamin Button movie, got the most noms for any picture that year. That whetted his appetite for more.

    Distinguished African-American artists did not care for “12 Years a Slave”, in comparison to other movies about their modern experiences. They didn’t like the idea of their ancestors suffering torture for the entertainment of white people. They didn’t want to generalize, of course; just voice their preference.
    BP knew that white guilt would get that Oscar for him. The voters responded in kind.
    But will they do it a second time? He’s counting on it!

    Reply
  96. Deanne said on July 18th, 2014 at 3:49 pm

    Ha ha…looks like Pitt is on a nice little vacay by himself.

    He was spotted in Essex on July 10th, and now he’s been photographed arriving in France.

    Where is Jolie?? Hiding her face, because of that video that was exposed??

    Whats going on?? Pitt and Jolie had another row about her past? tired of HER past coming out all the time, and him having connections to it? Or did they have a huge blowout because Selma is being released the same day as Unbroken. Making Jolie compete against another female award winning director. Is Pitt sabotaging his g/f chances here?? Does she feel like he dis-respected her?? You know he has the power to been in on the decision of what date it was being released seeing as Plan B is one of the producers on this movie. Was it Oprah who did this? She isn’t a fan of Jolie’s at all. Will Universal scrap that date, and move up the release of Unbroken from the 25th of December?? Or will Pitt ask that Selma movie change dates….hmmmm interesting.

    I can’t wait for Ians next big clue………

    Reply
  97. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2014 at 4:55 pm

    @Deanne:
    Maybe he’s over there picking out napkins for the wedding. You know, whenever you think it’s time to stop watching these two they go and do something that pulls you in again. Maybe that’s their game plan after all, to stay relevant any way they can.

    Reply
  98. joanne said on July 18th, 2014 at 6:26 pm

    @Guest2:
    There act is old and boring. Time for something younger and fresher. This circus needs to shut down. They make Americans look like the fools we are.

    Reply
  99. Deanne said on July 18th, 2014 at 7:13 pm

    Oh she’s drawing Pitt in again……now Universal is going to let her write, direct, produce a movie called “By the Sea, apparently Pitt is going to help produce it also. How the hell did she talk him into this??

    Is this why he’s hiding out in Europe?? Is he THAT stupid?? A movie starring a real life couple, never has had positive results at the box office! Damn fool he is. This isn’t 2005 anymore, and these two do not even show any chemistry together at all, especially on the red carpets.

    Reply
  100. WR said on July 19th, 2014 at 1:53 am

    And what good will those statuettes do, should a disaster strike, for example. The Oscar is a popularity award. George C. Scott, Marlon Brando and Woody Allen have expressed their disgust with the whole process of Oscar whoring.
    Should the world embrace WWIII, there will be no time to caress and cuddle the worthless icon made of copper and tin. It will end up mixed in with the garbage. To think some stars would practically sell their souls for this temporary accolade.

    A while back, there was an actor who won an Emmy, over some stiff competition, including Jack Lemmon, in “12 Angry Men”. The actor, Ving Rhames, victorious for his performance in “Don King, Only in America” uttered a maxim by Stanislavsky before calling Mr. Lemmon up to the podium. It took some effort, but Mr. Lemmon made his way. When he got there, the victorious actor told Mr. Lemmon that he was giving his Emmy to him for his performance. Mr. Lemmon tried to refuse. There was quite the gamut of reaction from the actors in the audience. The show was in the late 90s.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk3EqDPZDOw/

    Reply
  101. WR said on July 19th, 2014 at 2:27 am

    “Love the art in yourself not yourself in the art”.
    - Konstantin Stanislavsky.

    Reply
  102. Guest1 said on July 19th, 2014 at 9:09 am

    @Deanne:
    I’m wondering if she had a ghost screenwriter for this movie, rather than writing it herself.

    If what has been written about the movie is true, that it is about a couple that go away on vacation to try and save their marriage, I find this in poor taste. One thing is for sure, there won’t be any scenes of her in a bikini, unless they use a body double.

    I recently came across an article that stated that John Riley, the screenwriter for ‘12 Years a Slave’ did not seem happy to greet Jolie backstage after he won. There were pictures of him and Pitt together, and he seemed happy in those pictures. Here are the pictures of him and Jolie together:

    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2014/03/04/arts/ridley/ridley-blog480.jpg

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/03/article-2572147-1BFD3DAB00000578-969_306×292.jpg

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/03/article-2572147-1BFD596800000578-182_306×292.jpg

    Reply
  103. joanne said on July 19th, 2014 at 12:43 pm

    Since most awards look like phalluses I think they have other uses besides ego stroking.

    Reply
  104. WR said on July 19th, 2014 at 2:18 pm

    OT;

    The NEW YORK POST has a headline that blares “NO ONE IS AFRAID OF TOM CRUISE, ANYMORE”; or a facsimile.
    It cites The National Enquirer feature about a new book which outs TC; although it’s fiction. Then, no reaction from Cruise’s “army of lawyers”, who threaten to sue anyone who questions TC’s sexuality.

    No word about any new love interest for TC. When KH divorced him, there was a lot of publicity about him searching for a new “faux” romance. There was a certain Scieno who was at the front of “the pack”. Nothing came of that.

    Did you know that KH was at the rear of the preferred choices for TC when he “interviewed” candidates for his next wife? And that Lindsey Lohan was among the 5 considered? It was reported that Scarlett Johansson thought she was to be interviewed for a role in a new TC picture. When she found out what it really was about, she got out of that place in a hurry.

    Reply
  105. Keane said on July 19th, 2014 at 2:59 pm

    @WR:

    Hear hear! All AJ cares about is power, money and fame. She is the world’s most shallow human being.

    Reply
  106. Guest1 said on July 19th, 2014 at 6:15 pm

    Ian, how is Sugar Ray Ramone Catone?

    Reply
  107. WR said on July 20th, 2014 at 12:10 am

    @Keane:
    I’d give that accolade to BP, if it was mine to give.

    Reply
  108. WR said on July 20th, 2014 at 12:17 am

    @WR:
    DATELINE has a fascinating story about an actor who is involved with the show, DEXTER. Unfortunately, I got to it, rather late. Heard the labels, “Psychopath” and “Sociopath”.
    Anyone here watched it? Thoughts?

    Reply
  109. WR said on July 20th, 2014 at 12:19 am

    @joanne:
    Hadn’t heard that one! Did hear many times that guns, especially pistols are phallic symbols.

    Reply
  110. Deanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 12:49 am

    @Keane:

    You forgot one: Her image.

    If it wasn’t for nabbing Pitt, Angelina Jolie would be at D-list level. Her box office was horrid, she was getting Razzie nominations for every movie she had been in since Girl, Interrupted. She was becoming the laughingstock of Hollywood with her and BBT’s antics. When her people told her she should do some humanitarianism, to change her image…that is when all this BS about her being this great humanitarian..came about. She dragged Pitt into it, and they used the media to make it look like they were saviors of the people all over the world, to cover up for their illicit adulterous affair. It’s just all smoke and mirrors…and the sheeple buy into it. It’s an image she is projecting. It isn’t real.

    Reply
  111. Guest2 said on July 20th, 2014 at 1:03 am

    WR, I think this is what you saw. The author below wrote a book about a killer in Alberta who was an avid fan of the TV show Dexter and based his murders on the serial killer in that show. There seem to be a lot of psychopaths roaming the earth these days.

    http://www.stevelillebuen.com/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Twitchell

    Reply
  112. WR said on July 20th, 2014 at 1:56 am

    @Deanne:
    Thank you!
    There are so many poor, poor people in America. People going through trash bins to find food. I’ve personally seen seniors “dumpster diving” on weekends.

    While we’re all for publicity to get the rest of us involved in helping the poor; the fact is, most of us already do. And those who do not, usually don’t get involved just because of super-rich stars using the poor for career gains.

    Reply
  113. Keane said on July 20th, 2014 at 8:03 am

    @WR:

    I was in San Francisco a couple of months ago just for a couple of nights and I saw this as well and was deeply affected by it. To see people having to scrounge for food or whatever it was they were looking for in someone else’s trash in one of the wealthiest cities in America was disturbing to me. I have genuinely never seen such a big gap between the haves and the have nots.

    Reply
  114. Keane said on July 20th, 2014 at 8:24 am

    @Deanne:

    I completely agree with you but the danger is that she has now started to believe her own press. She wants to be a “humanitarian power player” (as stated in an article she fed to a journalist in Grazia magazine who has interviewed her many times throughout her career) and genuinely thinks she is a suitable candidate for political office. In the light of this, I was just wondering what Angelina Jolie’s stance might be on the current crisis in Europe over the downing of a plane full of civilians by Ukrainian separatists who are being funded and aided and abetted by Russia, and the subsequent disrespect they are paying to the bodies of the dead and their interference with attempts made by the international community to assess the crash site. I would like to know what Ms Jolie suggests we do in the light of this situation. What would be the measures she would take to force Putin to make the Russian rebels co-operate and to bring them to justice. And then, how about Putin – what should be done about him? Should he be allowed to wash his hands of this crime? If not, how exactly can a man who we are so dependent on for energy and for money and who has his finger on the nuclear button be brought to heel? As a person who seriously considers herself capable of running for political office and who would like to “devote her life to foreign policy” I would genuinely like to hear what course of action Angelina Jolie intends to take. Perhaps anonymous can advise us…

    Reply
  115. joanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 10:59 am

    @WR:
    Yes, read about the deaths and injuries that occurred using guns in sexual play. People do the strangest things.
    http://www.sodahead.com/living/sex-guns-and-accidents-can-guns-be-kinky/question-202032/?page=2&link=ibaf&q=accidents+involving+guns+during+sex+play

    Reply
  116. Deanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 12:47 pm

    @Keane:

    She would want the whole world to be “aware”. Her standard slogan. When she has no speech right in front of her, she uses a word salad. Haven’t you even noticed that she is never EVER asked questions, outside of her having prepared answers in front of her? This is why she has never sat down for an interview. People would see her as the unintelligent poser that she is!

    Reply
  117. Deanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 12:51 pm

    @Keane:

    Sad indeed. Another thing, the elderly in this country. Those who have to choose between buying medication and food. One such patient of mine was actually buying CAT food to survive! No excuses. We live in the richest nation on the land, and we have our elderly buying cat food, or baby food, to survive!

    Yet we send millions upon millions to help others in the world, and then we are persecuted around the world.

    Reply
  118. Keane said on July 20th, 2014 at 1:35 pm

    @Deanne:

    Yes I think the problem for AJ is that the position of wanting people to be “aware” only really works when it comes to situations in which there are refugees who require aid or victims of war crimes in conflict zones. There is nothing wrong with this position as it is one that we all obviously would agree with – no-one wants to see people having to flee their land and live without food, shelter or healthcare and no-one wants innocent civilians to be the victim of war crimes either. The problem for AJ is that foreign policy is unfortunately a lot more complicated than merely expressing concern for victims and campaigning for “awareness” of their plight. It involves very tricky decisions in which the line between what is right and what is wrong is sometimes not always black and white and when it is black and white (like with the situation in the Ukraine now) what can be done about it is effectively very little. But as a world do we want this man to remain unpunished for his responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of innocent people? No, we do not. But do we want to risk the possibility of starting a third world war, which will be a nuclear one, which will claim the loss of millions of more lives? No, we certainly do not. So what is to be done? The answer is something only very skilled, very informed and very experienced politicians can even attempt to address. And it is why this woman’s pretensions to political office (particularly a role in the foreign office) and the White House are nothing short of laughable.

    Reply
  119. joanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 2:03 pm

    @Deanne:
    Poor people are consider freeloaders in the mighty USA.

    Reply
  120. joanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 2:08 pm

    forgot the ed. Anyway, its been that way for awhile. They are yelling about immigrants yet my grandparents came over from Europe to work in their mines as slaves and washing clothes to make ends meet because granddad liked to drink, make kids and be waited on hand and food. They kept the hate going. They had sections they lived in, irish, slovack, etc. and of course they kept the hate going. The coal kings knew they would be easier to handle. Now they want cheaper slaves and there is nothing we can do about it.

    Reply
  121. joanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 2:09 pm

    and the poor just live off the government aka a rich mans taxes (yea, right).

    Reply
  122. Deanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 2:20 pm

    Jolie will never hold a political office. How she will get into a REAL political arena is through the back door, by possibly snagging a politician. William Hague can’t do anything more for her now, since he’s lost his position in the UK.

    Reply
  123. dilateriousdilatante said on July 20th, 2014 at 4:03 pm

    @Keane:
    The problem that most people do not see is that we may end up there anyway. We could never accept as a nation to watch the Palestinians you children and the elderly as human shields so they can keep hurling rockets into ISRAEL. They have always broke every cease fire they have ever had.

    FURTHER, THE WORD PALESTINE IS A “ROMAN WORD,” FOR THOSE OF YOU LINGUISTICALLY CHALLENGED. IT IS ALWAYS ABSOLUTELY BIZARRE TO LISTEN TO PALESTINIANS YELL THEY ARE IN FACT PALESTINIANS WHEN THEY ARE EITHER PERSIAN, ARABIC, LEBANESE, JORDANIAN, SYRIAN, OR SOME OTHER!!!

    The conflict in the Ukraine is born out of using energy as a weapon (specifically oil,) and attempting to cut off the supply globally. Because of shale oil, the US has now become the largest oil producer in the world supplanting even the SAUDIS.

    Reply
  124. dilateriousdilatante said on July 20th, 2014 at 4:08 pm

    @Deanne:
    Her feeble attempt is just that, feeble!!! It clearly demonstrates an ongoing epistle by Hollywood leeches to try to drown out any reasonable dialog that will yield truth. She said at her symposium in the UK that she is a partner with that HAGHEAD “HAGUE.” I wonder how it feels now to have ZERO partner.

    Reply
  125. WR said on July 20th, 2014 at 6:01 pm

    My Catholic friends might think I’m being sacrilegious, because my church is preaching a practically open border policy. This, to me, is all right; but, why not open the borders to refugees all around the world, not just South America.

    In addition, doesn’t the Vatican have untold wealth? And the current pope wants to emulate Saint Francis? Since they want more and more people inside our country, why not open up the vaults to help pay the expenses that has already accumulated accommodating the illegals.
    Will they still expect we, the churchgoers, to pay for all those illegals?
    Like I said, I feel like a traitor to my church for saying this.

    Reply
  126. WR said on July 20th, 2014 at 6:08 pm

    @joanne:
    Thank you; and this is why our voices must be heard. We have to oppose this as much as we are able. This requires a lot of work on our part, but we must remember the powerful words of Edmund Burke:

    “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.”
    He actually said “good men”, but he would amend it for 2014, I’m thinking!

    Reply
  127. Keane said on July 20th, 2014 at 7:30 pm

    Oh my God I’ve just been joining the dots on something else. The paedophile ring it’s worse than I thought, much, much worse. Oh my God.

    Reply
  128. joanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 9:15 pm

    @Keane:
    Yes it is. Look at Penn State. The attorney general who stalled the case is now Governor . Big donations from Sanduskys ‘charity’.

    Reply
  129. joanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 9:26 pm

    I always wondered why those ‘poor children’ in Jolies photo ops were naked. Everyone dressed but the poor refugee Jolie was bringing ‘awareness’ to.

    Reply
  130. Deanne said on July 20th, 2014 at 10:35 pm

    @Keane:

    Well…..are you going to share your knowledge?? Or can’t you?? I would understand if you can’t.

    Reply
  131. Guest2 said on July 20th, 2014 at 11:23 pm

    @Keane:
    I hope you can tell us what the dots are that you connected but in the meantime here’s some information about a group in the US that has been lobbying our Congress for many years to change the laws to make pedophilia legal. I fear that it is just a matter of time before they succeed in doing so as my feeling is that they have made it into political positions of power. There is an article that alleges Michael Jackson was a pedophile. Don’t know if it is true but I tend to believe it is.

    http://www.nambla.org/

    Reply
  132. joanne said on July 21st, 2014 at 2:44 am

    @WR:
    No one gives a fuck anymore. Mel Brooks said it best.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYqF_BtIwAU

    Reply
  133. Keane said on July 21st, 2014 at 6:19 am

    @Deanne:

    Not on this one no I’m sorry – the ramifications are too huge. Much bigger than anyone could possibly imagine. I am shocked by it.

    Reply
  134. Deanne said on July 21st, 2014 at 1:22 pm

    @Keane:

    Ok, can I ask this one question, does it have anything to do with that Hollywood director that is being sued??

    Reply
  135. Keane said on July 21st, 2014 at 2:55 pm

    @Deanne:

    No it doesn’t – I don’t actually know anything about that Director. I can’t really talk about this to be honest as it is too serious. I really can’t say anything more about it than that right now sorry.

    Reply
  136. Deanne said on July 21st, 2014 at 6:17 pm

    @Keane:

    Ok, thank you Keane, and I respect it….I won’t ask any other questions.

    I understand it is serious, anything regarding children being abused is serious.

    I just hope those children get the justice they deserve, and those abusers get what is coming to them.

    Reply
  137. dilaterious dilatante said on July 21st, 2014 at 6:56 pm

    @WR:Wr,
    You should never feel like a traitor for stating outright truth. The church should have stepped up years ago.

    Reply
  138. WR said on July 21st, 2014 at 9:34 pm

    From what I understand, the lawsuit against Singer was dropped.
    Now if I read some of the blog sites right, that lawsuit had many famous celebs scared out of their minds. If I read correctly, a certain actor hastily arranged an engagement to get married.
    Then the litigation was terminated.
    So will there still be a marriage in the offing; or, will there be an amicable parting of the ways?

    Reply
  139. WR said on July 21st, 2014 at 9:44 pm

    Will wedding bells EVER ring for Brangelina? Remember his self-aggrandizing statement about not marrying until everybody can get married? To some of us, that was a most convenient statement. Very clever, because it made the gays very happy to have a world celebrity in their corner; or, was he? Does it now occur to the most astute of them, that they were used? And that marriage wasn’t going to happen, after all?

    And when will JA and JT walk down the aisle to the tune by Mendelsshon?

    These speculations sold a lot of tabs. Maybe the publicity was what they were really after.

    Reply
  140. WR said on July 22nd, 2014 at 12:53 am

    @WR:
    But of course, in the end, I dutifully bow to the truth. Now, we are not dutifully bound to agree with every viewpoint of the pope, but only when he speaks in dogmatic terms.

    Reply
  141. WR said on July 22nd, 2014 at 12:56 am

    @WR:
    They are referred to, as “Ex Cathedra” statements.

    Reply
  142. Keane said on July 22nd, 2014 at 9:15 am

    Hm… can’t say too much here but I think it is fair to say that people are speculating that William Hague’s firing wasn’t quite so much to do with his hobnobbing with Angelina as something altogether more serious. If Angelina thought Hague was her ticket to political credibility she appears to have shot herself in the foot somewhat…

    Reply
  143. Deanne said on July 22nd, 2014 at 9:51 am

    @Keane:

    Keane,
    Do you think this is ever going to be exposed?

    Reply
  144. Keane said on July 22nd, 2014 at 11:29 am

    @Deanne:

    I do yes, I think it is about to be exposed very shortly. There is no hiding that dossier now it is public knowledge. All the newspapers and one or two campaigning MPs are going after it now and the exposure of Jimmy Saville, Haut de la Garenne et al has given credibility to the rumours in the public eye meaning that plausible deniability is not possible for the government. Cameron’s sudden and dramatic cabinet re-shuffle was all about this. He got rid of anyone who was either involved in it or was involved in trying to cover it up. He knows it’s all about to hit the fan and I would say the appointment of Baroness Butler-Schloss to head-up the enquiry was another attempt to keep a lid on it. The British establishment has some dirty secrets for sure and it seems like there are people out there who would go to any lengths to keep them quiet.

    Reply
  145. Guest said on July 22nd, 2014 at 11:36 am

    David and Rebekah sitting in a tree K-I-S-S-I-N-G

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

July 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Meta