IUC Key Clue: And Jesus Said…..

Posted on March 14th, 2013 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

jesusajp

  1. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on March 14th, 2013 at 1:57 pm

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA……like Jolie/Pitt would sell everything they have to give to the poor. I don’t think they’ve EVER given anything they rightfully worked for to the poor. All those donations were given by the SELLING of their kids pictures. Not one red cent has EVER come from their own personal earnings. BTW, those donations have come to a screeching halt….haven’t they? No more, doing this or that under the guise of charity.

    Reply
  2. joanne said on March 14th, 2013 at 2:30 pm

    Partners in crime? buying and selling poor children? I’m going to hell. :lol:

    Reply
  3. sinker said on March 14th, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    clicking on picture says

    jesusajp
    so, it’s about angie…

    Reply
  4. sinker said on March 14th, 2013 at 3:32 pm

    not seeing any clues on ian’s twitter.

    my guess is ajp is going broke but will cover her tracks by claiming she has decided to sell everything and give to the poor.

    Reply
  5. WCKitty said on March 14th, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    @sinker:
    Good guess. Brad is out there doing all kinds of commercials, so he obviously isn’t doing well financially. I noticed that he has no speaking parts in those commercials either, :lol: Angie isn’t even getting that kind of work.

    Reply
  6. Guest2 said on March 14th, 2013 at 3:55 pm

    Could ajp stand for aniston jolie pitt? Not sure how this ties in to the clue which I guess is a key clue. I wish Ian hadn’t brought jesus into this.

    Reply
  7. Dream said on March 14th, 2013 at 4:15 pm

    jesus a jp? they adopted a mexican kid? lol well not really all that far fetched and i guess. they don’t have any hispanic kids in their rainbow.

    Reply
  8. Guest2 said on March 14th, 2013 at 4:57 pm

    @Dream:
    That’s an interesting interpretation. For the sake of the possible child I hope it’s not true.

    Reply
  9. iwasanon said on March 14th, 2013 at 5:22 pm

    @Dream:
    LOL, no now they’ll adopt from Argentina ;)

    Reply
  10. iwasanon said on March 14th, 2013 at 5:27 pm

    Quick glance

    ajp – did she change her name to Angie jolie-pitt? remember at the time of NOTW there were rumors she tried to negotiate for all future adoptees to use the name J-P even though she wasn’t with Brad anymore. Supposedly he said no to this. So maybe she changed her name as a backlash.

    key clue – the move took place and someone changed the locks?
    from Amzaon – The Crazy Key Clue (Nancy Drew Notebooks #15)
    Nancy’s puppy finds an old key in Bess’s backyard, and after Bess puts the key in the house, it disappears! Who took it? What’s the big secret? Nancy’s asking the questions, and the answer could be a real surprise.

    Reply
  11. Jaded said on March 14th, 2013 at 5:38 pm

    I think this is an allusion to bloodlines and royal/(un)holy lineage, perhaps? Is there a key or a keyhole on the new papal coat of arms?

    Reply
  12. Guest2 said on March 14th, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Or maybe they got married secretly and she changed her name.

    Reply
  13. rushdog said on March 14th, 2013 at 5:49 pm

    Ian chose this photo for a reason. Two pics with Popes. I’m on my phone so can’t see the pics clearly but fairly certain the pic on the left is Pope Benedict. I can’t tell on the right. The V. – money, secrets, scandal. Then a pic of poor Africans standing in line for food. I’d say hypocracy is a part of this clue. Still thinking…

    Reply
  14. Jaded said on March 14th, 2013 at 6:12 pm

    Great comment Rushdog. In the one pic the chair behind the pope has his papal seal. Enlarged it would show two keys crossed as well as one, maybe two, heads of a black Ethiopian king (maybe King Solomon). The Vatican is rich on the backs of black children. (On set of pictures on top of the other.) Jesus may have been black and popes pray to a Black Mary statue in one of their prep rooms. The irony and as you said, the hypocrisy of it all.

    Reply
  15. rushdog said on March 14th, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    Luke
    The rich young ruler then responds: “All these I have kept from my youth” (v. 21). To which Jesus responds: “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (v. 22).

    A common interpretation of the verse is that Jesus was telling the ruler that he (the ruler) was a sinner and that he had not kept the commandments. He had not followed the law.

    Reply
  16. rushdog said on March 14th, 2013 at 6:40 pm

    Not really sure what “key Clue” (noticed Clue is capitalized – like the game? he he – Bradders in the kitchen with a wrench). Obviously it means this is a key clue, but a key clue to what…the current situation…why they’re still together…what’s happening tomorrow…what IAN???

    Re: Benedict – his years as pontiff have been marked by the sex abuse scandals worldwide. Also current financial questions of the Vatican Bank include money laundering. With declining contributions the church makes much of it’s money from financial holdings and the sale of real estate.

    Just saying…with the photos and The Bible verse…if someone was donating all their money to charity why would Ian post it in this way? I’m leaning that the Vatican situation is representative of whatever is going on with someone.

    Reply
  17. Jaded said on March 14th, 2013 at 7:06 pm

    The keys are on the coat of arms which are on the papal CHAIR. There is a white arm CHAIR in IH’s recent Twit pic. … I really have no idea.

    Reply
  18. rushdog said on March 14th, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    Not sure this post is meant to go this far into this but…the keys on the Papal chair represent the “keys to the kingdom” given to Peter in Matthew 16: 19, all authority.

    One gold and one silver represent the power of loosing and binding. To bind- to forbid by an indisputable authority.To loose – to permit by indisputable authority.

    Reply
  19. Pauly P said on March 14th, 2013 at 8:01 pm

    Just to add to RD analysis, i am copying Matthew 19:21 – 19:30 for context:

    21 Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

    22 When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.

    23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven.

    24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

    25 When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?”

    26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

    27 Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you! What then will there be for us?”

    28 Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

    29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife[c] or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.

    30 But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first.:

    The first thing I thought of was what a scam this is. So rich people need to donate their money to church to allow them to go to heaven (sorry skeptical side coming through). Then in context to to AJ and BP I thought maybe it’s highlighting their downfall. They tried to cleanse their reps after their affair by donating money everywhere. Now they are broke, not because they gave their money away but spent it, so they don’t have money or a good reputation.

    Reply
  20. Simms said on March 14th, 2013 at 8:42 pm

    So jolie and pitt are going to beome nuns? Oh maybe church missionarys.

    Reply
  21. Kate said on March 14th, 2013 at 9:00 pm

    I have always understood this parable to be about Jesus showing this young man, that no he was not really keeping the Ten Commandments. He said he had since he was young, but when Jesus tells him to sell everything and follow him, he tests him, and he suddenly realizes that his money is more important to him that God is. He does honor another God and that is his wealth. He can not part with it. That is why he is sad, He thinks he has kept the law, but he hasn’t, and even when he realizes it, instead of having a humble heart amd asking for Jesus to have mercy, he walks away accepting his fate. There is an arrogance in that. Jesus did not care if he gave away all his wealth, he was looking at the state of this young mans heart and soul.. He wanted to do it his way. He did not want to sacrifice. It could have just as easily been a fisherman with a boat, the only thing he had to make a living. This could fit many narcissist actors , and there are many that it does not. This could be 75 percent of the ones we talk about. ajp . Is there something Angelina can not give up? Or Brange? Or all of them? I am only commenting on this because I think this is a important parable. God is not asking everyone to mail in a check, or have a huge mega garage sale. :) jmho though.

    Reply
  22. Kate said on March 14th, 2013 at 10:00 pm

    @rushdog:
    Isn’t a key clue the piece of information that would unravel a mystery, investigation, something like that? Maybe Ian has found that one thing that will make the truth undeniable about them. He has always said they are the biggest frauds of the decade. I bet he would love to prove that once and forever.

    Reply
  23. liv4 said on March 14th, 2013 at 10:02 pm

    I don’t know if this will trigger anything but the key clue to a new Pope is white smoke.

    Reply
  24. rushdog said on March 14th, 2013 at 10:24 pm

    @Kate:
    @liv4:
    He’s never referred to her as ajp (although there’s always a first time!) so I’m wondering if Guest2 is correct and ajp is the trio. And Jesus (figuratively here) is saying you are sinners, you have not followed the Commandments and you live a life of pretend, lies and fraud. I don’t think any of them could walk away from their fame and all the attention. It’s their drug…their aphrodisiac.

    white smoke – ?smoke and mirrors. In the photo I’m sure the Pope on the left is Benedict; on the right may be him also or John Paul. I don’t believe the right photo is Pope Francis. So again, Pope Benedicts tenure has been marked by scandal and financial problems.

    Reply
  25. rushdog said on March 14th, 2013 at 10:25 pm

    @Kate:
    Lol, if Ian has found the one thing that is undeniable then I wish he would share it in English!!

    Reply
  26. Togi said on March 14th, 2013 at 10:44 pm

    In this photo I see two separate adults, aged and having reached their highest pinnacle. One is hiding behind the cross, the other is facing the crowd, even waiving. Whilst they are at the top of the food chain, there are many children starving. For what? Attention? Looking at it in this context, I could see the JPs. :)

    Reply
  27. Stella said on March 15th, 2013 at 12:53 am

    Jesus was specifically speaking to a rich man who loved his treasures more than anything else. However, the man could not let go. This young man was addicted to the power money gave him and that was his achilles heel.

    The issue here was. GREED.

    Reply
  28. Guest1 said on March 15th, 2013 at 7:37 am

    Pope Benedict XVI is the Pope on the left. He was Pope from 2005 to 2013 . . .

    Here is the article which accompanies the picture:

    http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/religion_theseeker/2008/04/what-will-the-p.html

    Reply
  29. rushdog said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:30 pm

    Some good thoughts above. Yesterday I tweeted Ian with: “key to what…why still together?” and he responded a short time ago:

    “huge facade they put on.”

    So this isn’t just about her. I would conclude that’s it’s all three of them. There’s another photo tweet w/food items including french fries, bread and some type of meat.

    Also, the photo with this post was not created by Ian. There is a series of this type of card with Pope Benedict’s picture all critical with the idea that Jesus would be disapponted. I haven’t been able to find the original source of the cards yet.

    Reply
  30. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:32 pm

    I wonder if “ajp” tag is A for angie and jp for thee kids.

    Reply
  31. rushdog said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:38 pm

    @liv4:
    which three kids?

    Reply
  32. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:45 pm

    And the pic to me says one has everything and the other has nothing. For some it would indicate hypocrisy, the rich garments of the Pope and crown vs. starving children as this similar meme at http://www.motifake.com/go-sell-everything-you-have-pope-catholic-religion-atheist-j-demotivational-posters-137264.html.

    Reply
  33. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:46 pm

    @rushdog:
    Three should have been “the”.

    Reply
  34. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:47 pm

    And if it is all three in the triangle maybe it is just that all three are using this triangle still to their advantage, i.e. the wedding wars.

    Reply
  35. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:48 pm

    @rushdog:
    I see we are thinking alike with the Pope meme. Does it boil down to something as simple as hypocrisy?

    Reply
  36. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:54 pm

    @rushdog:
    This just showed up on my feed so I didn’t see it.

    Reply
  37. rushdog said on March 15th, 2013 at 1:59 pm

    @liv4:
    Ian tweeted me “huge facade they put on” so do they put on a facade because of angie and the kids? I think Ian chose the photo because the children are poor and hungry. I don’t think that represents their children but the fraud, the facade. They are people that keep up an image. They talk the talk and sometimes they appear to walk the walk (I mean who really knows…). But they don’t live the life.

    I wonder if his choice of photo also represents a higher authority. With them it wouldn’t be the Pope but probably the UN and that would fit with the children. And with hypocrisy and greed which I would say both are a part of this post.

    Just rambling now, but is that why this is a key Clue as to…the huge facade they put on? Hypocrisy and greed? It seems like this would be something more tangible. For a long time I’ve felt there was something more going on. They continue the facade because the truth is…so damaging. Don’t know…

    Reply
  38. rushdog said on March 15th, 2013 at 2:00 pm

    @liv4:
    I was typing when I saw this post and I thought it would be like mine. We’re on the same wavelength. Maybe it is hypocrisy but we knew that, right, lol!!

    Reply
  39. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 2:01 pm

    Also, since I’ve seen Ian’s clue “huge facade they put on”, it seems he is saying hypocrisy. The Catholic Church (and I am Catholic) has sordid secrets and cover ups. I just don’t know what the tag “ajp” is referring to – all.

    Reply
  40. rushdog said on March 15th, 2013 at 2:20 pm

    @liv4:
    I think Ian’s posted plenty of clues over the past three years to strongly suggest secrets. And I have to say again that Pope Benedict’s term has been marked by sex abuse scandals in the church and financial troubles at the Vatican Bank including a recent charge of money laundering. This may not apply literally to “ajp” but simply indicate the degree of secrets, much more than just a subtle acknowledgement of mutually beneficial pr and personal “proclivities.”

    Reply
  41. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 2:26 pm

    @rushdog:
    So true.

    What’s up with the pic of gross food?

    Reply
  42. WCKitty said on March 15th, 2013 at 3:23 pm

    @liv4:
    Does this have to do with France? It’s three helpings of pate to spread on the two slices of French bread? The pate is covered with some type of herbs and one mushroom. So, is the picture portraying three coverups? in France? (french-fry’s). There is also one small spoonful of pate. The French consume a lot of mushrooms. :)

    Reply
  43. liv4 said on March 15th, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    It is pate? Shows you what I know. Somehow I think the Key Clue is nothing is as it seems, probably will never know the truth because it will be covered up one way or another, Papal or otherwise.

    Reply
  44. rushdog said on March 15th, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Wow!! Great thoughts. I can’t always identify all the food in Ian’s photos. Well let’s see…two slices of bread – him and her? Or the twins cuz that’s where they were born (and I’ve never believed that picture was the way it was presented to the public). Or is it something else relating to the home there – herbs and mushrooms – something produced in addition to wine? Or maybe all of the above. So they’ve got to keep up the facade or something will leak? Hmmm….

    Reply
  45. WCKitty said on March 15th, 2013 at 4:15 pm

    @rushdog:
    Is there a reason the fries are in a fry-basket?

    Reply
  46. rushdog said on March 15th, 2013 at 6:30 pm

    @WCKitty:
    well it looks like it could be the basket they were fried in or served in a basket to look that way just for the presentation. Fries are fried in oil (hmmm….). Restaurant fries are usually fried twice and it’s the second time that makes them crispy, but it has to be the right oil that which is continuously used (too new or too old doesn’t work right). Blanching, freezing and then frying twice is said to make the best and most crispy fries.

    French fries don’t have much to do with France other than the name.

    Reply
  47. WCKitty said on March 15th, 2013 at 6:53 pm

    @rushdog:
    I understand that they are just named “French Fries.” I just saw the pate, french bread, and french fries and the fries are in a basket. I am not very good at these riddles and was just wondering if Ian posts pictures like that for a reason or is it just there. Could they have been or are about to be served and fried by the French for the three piles of covered/garnished (facade?) pate that looks like yuck? :lol:

    Reply
  48. Capri said on March 15th, 2013 at 8:34 pm

    Two out of the three are legitimate french items, one is not. One sails under the facade of being what it is not?

    Reply
  49. Guest2 said on March 15th, 2013 at 9:02 pm

    <@WCKitty:
    I don’t know how you figured out it’s pate (I agree it is) – I thought it was a yucky meatloaf. As Capri said, two are legitimate French items, just like the twins are legitimate French citizens since they were born there (at least I assume that to be the case, I don’t really know French law). The rest of them are french fries, fake French wannabes. I have no idea what any of this means.

    Reply
  50. WCKitty said on March 15th, 2013 at 10:45 pm

    It’s one of those items that I have avoided trying at gatherings just like caviar. Yuck!!! I love meatloaf, but I only eat it if it is made with ground turkey since I avoid red meat. Capri is probably right and I don’t know French law either. I also have no idea what this clue means just like all the rest of them. I thought I’d just take a stab at it since I saw items that could be all categorized with the label “French” even though I understand that the yummy fries (I haven’t eaten dinner yet and I like them real crispy {bad}) are not by any means a French food. Maybe somebody else can make better sense of this clue, but it appears many of the regular posters have taken a break or something.

    Have you been enjoying any of the posts over at FF? It seems like the posts have also died down at that site.

    Reply
  51. WCKitty said on March 15th, 2013 at 10:46 pm

    @WCKitty:
    That post was in response to Guest2 @Guest2:

    Reply
  52. Guest1 said on March 15th, 2013 at 11:02 pm

    Maybe the JP’s will be serving the “French” food pictured on their wedding day at Miraval. I wonder if crickets will be served as an appetizer.

    Reply
  53. Guest2 said on March 16th, 2013 at 8:01 am

    @WCKitty:
    Yes, things seem to have died down at FF and here too. Maybe we’re just getting bored with the subject matter but I think it’s more that there isn’t much to talk about right now. However, I still want to know why aj is keeping such a low profile and why brad did that blatantly staged walk in the middle of the Paris street staring into the camera lens. I’ve always wondered if those particular pap strolls are meant to convey a message to certain people kind of like “mission accomplished”. I also wonder why they are never papped at the chateau. They either keep their visits there very tightly controlled or they just never go there.

    Reply
  54. Birdsfly said on March 16th, 2013 at 11:07 am

    The Pope is the Father of the Church. The picture above shows two different Popes = two different Fathers. Combine that fact with the latest picture tweet from Ian- which shows three different French foods, with only two of the foods being ‘authentic’. It appears the Key Clue is that Brad is the father of only 2 of the Bios….which we have suspected for quite some time…

    Reply
  55. Mistory said on March 16th, 2013 at 12:41 pm

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=381558

    I like this post

    Reply
  56. Mistory said on March 16th, 2013 at 12:42 pm

    @Mistory:

    They look so Pathetic !!

    Reply
  57. Mistory said on March 16th, 2013 at 12:43 pm

    @Mistory:

    They look so Pathetic !!!

    Reply
  58. Birdsfly said on March 16th, 2013 at 4:02 pm

    Hello, I am a first time poster, but long-time lurker on this site, since almost the beginning. I posted a messge earlier, and it appeared in the Comments for a short time. But, then disappeared?? I’ll try it again….The Pope is the Father of the Church. The above picture is of two different Popes = two different Fathers. So, combine that clue with the clue from the recently tweeted phot from Ian: three different French foods, but only two are ‘authentic’. Key Clue is about Father(s) of the Bios.

    Reply
  59. Dream said on March 16th, 2013 at 4:43 pm

    ok a real question about the post. ajp, has angie and brad married? angie is not a jolie pitt. unless shes married.

    Reply
  60. Guest1 said on March 16th, 2013 at 4:45 pm

    @Guest2:
    Remember last year, all the reports of reporters camped out outside of Miraval, and helicopters overhead. If I recall correctly, they were waiting for Brangelina to get married. But I don’t recall seeing even one picture to verify this. I always wonder if this report was false, and someone leaked this information for P/R.

    Reply
  61. Guest2 said on March 16th, 2013 at 6:19 pm

    @Dream:
    I wondered about that too. If that’s the news this certainly is a very strange way of delivering it considering they’re both anti-religion.

    Reply
  62. Guest2 said on March 16th, 2013 at 6:29 pm

    <b@Guest1:
    I remember that and I wondered why there weren’t any pics then. I think all the wedding rumors have been leaked by them for PR. It’s strange that they met with the Perrin family and made arrangements for upgrading the wine-making equipment and we never heard a word about it until the new wine was announced. Yet brad just happens to be caught by the paps walking in the middle of the street in Paris. It’s so blatantly obvious what he’s doing but why doesn’t anyone call him out on it?

    Reply
  63. Dream said on March 16th, 2013 at 6:34 pm

    @Guest1:
    lol the blind gossip guy was so proud of his original blind item about j/p getting married. when it didnt happen that blind item sure did disappear fast.

    Reply
  64. Guest2 said on March 16th, 2013 at 7:21 pm

    Someone at FF posted this North Korean video about western propaganda in the popular culture. It’s worth watching.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irw7SRv-l44

    Reply
  65. Guest2 said on March 17th, 2013 at 11:22 am

    Happy St. Paddy’s Day to all our Irish friends here and to those of us who are for this one day.

    An Irish Prayer
    May God give you…
    For every storm, a rainbow,
    For every tear, a smile,
    For every care, a promise,
    And a blessing in each trial.
    For every problem life sends,
    A faithful friend to share,
    For every sigh, a sweet song,
    And an answer for each prayer.

    Reply
  66. WR said on March 18th, 2013 at 12:34 am

    I notice from other sites that many bloggers don’t put much credence, if any, on blind items. I wonder if the blinds cannot really be about someone famous enough to matter. So many of these blinds are there to have us click them on; they are so lame.
    Back in the day, blind items were juicy items. Now, most of them are of people labeled celebrities that we don’t know from the person on the street.

    Reply
  67. WR said on March 18th, 2013 at 12:48 am

    Re: the Key Clue: And Jesus Said…
    We read the New Testament, and use it to work on our own inventory. We are represented amongst the players of His time. We may not recognize ourselves, but we are there. It’s up to us to learn who we are, and then move on from there. Not easy, I know. I fail most of the time.
    One thing that Jesus said that hits harder than most, to me: When he said that prostitutes would enter The Kingdom of Heaven before many of us who are sayers, and not doers. I’m paraphrasing some of this.
    One must remember that Mary of Magdala was possessed by seven devils. She repented, and now is considered one of the greatest saints in the Church. She was especially close to Jesus. And the Samaritan woman at the well. She has been part of the story of Jesus for over 2,000 years. Yet, she was involved with at least six men, some of whom were her husbands at the time she met Jesus.
    My hat is off to those who seriously acknowledge Jesus before humanity! They inspire we, who are onlookers, not activists!

    Reply
  68. WR said on March 18th, 2013 at 1:15 am

    Listening to Celtic Thunder Mythology on PBS. Earlier, had an Irish supper along with acquaintances of various standings. Not being Irish, I nevertheless enjoyed the terrific fare. The chef did himself proud.
    One Irish tenant here is quite vocal about country music roots here in the U.S. Let him know I was already aware of country music history. But, alas, I don’t care for modern country. Ha!

    Reply
  69. Guest2 said on March 18th, 2013 at 11:16 am

    I know this site is a haven for loons but I found these great photos of the Affleck family and they are such a stark contrast to the Pitt family photos. I know they stage photo ops like the pitts do but they are so much better at it and the kids are absolutely darling and almost always look happy. I know they have nannies too but I do think they are more hands on than the other two turkeys.

    http://www.celebitchy.com/286525/jennifer_garner_admits_that_she_bribes_her_kids_dont_we_all_/

    Reply
  70. Simms said on March 18th, 2013 at 1:04 pm

    @Guest2:Yes the garner-aFfleck kids are adorable,no scowling
    At the cameraThe kids look soo look like garner. But. I do see some matt damon in her son lol.

    Reply
  71. Dream said on March 18th, 2013 at 2:37 pm

    @WR:
    i am with u on the modern country wr. then i prefer bluegrass.

    Reply
  72. Dream said on March 18th, 2013 at 2:41 pm

    @WR:
    i think the lower we sink the more we are honest with ourselves how we got there. to be forgiven u most confess in ur heart and take responsibility for ur actions. so seems logical those whoes lives do not work out well are the first ones in heaven.

    Reply
  73. Dream said on March 18th, 2013 at 2:42 pm

    and heres hoping u all made it thru st paddys day without a headache.

    Reply
  74. Guest2 said on March 18th, 2013 at 4:04 pm

    @Simms:
    Matt Damon??!! Don’t tell Ben, lol. The kids all got their mom’s dimples, too cute.

    Reply
  75. WR said on March 19th, 2013 at 2:28 am

    I saw the pics of Michael Douglas, as Liberace; and Matt Damon, as his lover. It looked, well…strange, to me. But reports are they are quite happy with the movie.
    Interesting, that a few yrs ago, Matt was doing great with the Bourne Identity franchise, and Ben was struggling. Now, Ben has won almost every prize for directing and producing “Argo” after the highly publicized snub by the movie directors who voted the oscar nominations.

    Reply
  76. WR said on March 19th, 2013 at 2:35 am

    @Dream:
    And I read that The Almighty judges the heart. So those people may not have been approved by the authorities, but they had hearts of gold. But Jesus always added: Thy sins are forgiven; go and sin no more. Now, there’s the rub for some of us. We give up, saying what’s the use? Yet, we musn’t give up. When we do, we deny His inestimable mercy.
    That’s a good discussion in this season before Easter. I checked out a book from the library. It’s title: The Complete Idiot’s Guide to THE BIBLE. I also like to watch Joyce Meyer. She had had a hard life before she changed to become a minister.

    Reply
  77. Guest2 said on March 19th, 2013 at 8:02 am

    This is a review of pitt’s cadillac commercial in china, not good. How does he keep getting these jobs when he’s so bad in the ads?

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=382360&sid=6f095d3b66b030e7f6684c19b36c5044

    Reply
  78. Dream said on March 19th, 2013 at 2:30 pm

    @WR:
    i lived a very different life before i ended up in bed 24/7. i have had a lot of time to reflect on my life. maybe thats a blessing.
    i used to see myself as a good christian, now i see where i fell short so many times. i used to blame others now i am realistic that my life may have been hard but i had choices.
    i dont know if the christ story is true, i have a hard time with the whole god on earth thing. jesus was a man that had a beautiful and realistic view of life whether u believe or not.
    i admire ur ability to rise above and take the high road. i wish so much i could have ur certainty in who and what god is. i strive to find the place u are in. your posts always leave me thinking.

    Reply
  79. Mistory said on March 19th, 2013 at 3:01 pm

    @Guest2:
    He put tons of make up on the ad !!! Stupid

    Reply
  80. WR said on March 20th, 2013 at 4:05 am

    @Dream:
    Thank you. All I can say is that I’m no expert, but I do read a lot, and I was raised by the Golden Rule. A clergyman would have more to offer in the way of answers than I, who didn’t focus on religious studies. I do know one of the top complaints I’ve heard over and over again, is, Why does God allow such horrible things to happen to innocent people? Why do evildoers get rewarded, while the good have to suffer the consequences of what evildoers put out there? I have good answers, but they’re not enough, and I totally understand why my answers don’t fill their need to know. A clergyman/clergywoman would know much better than I.
    You know, I have read The New Testament so many times, and I’m stymied with some of the things Jesus said. Keep promising myself that I”ll attend a bible class, and some worldly matter comes up, and there I go.
    Not a good role model, I’m afraid. You probably know what happens when you’re sideswiped, and a bad mood suddenly kicks in. Helpless! helpless! helpless! (Too late I realize I should have said a prayer, or more!)
    That’s what keeps Pride at bay, if anything can.

    Reply
  81. Guest2 said on March 20th, 2013 at 7:27 am

    @WR:
    WR, you might enjoy the series “The Bible” on the History channel. I watched the first part On Demand last night that starts with Noah’s Ark and ends just before David. Not sure it will answer the questions but it’s very well done and one of the better programs on television.

    Reply
  82. Guest2 said on March 20th, 2013 at 3:04 pm

    Where did everyone go?

    Reply
  83. Mistory said on March 20th, 2013 at 3:28 pm

    @Guest2:
    ????? I don’t know

    Reply
  84. Dream said on March 20th, 2013 at 4:05 pm

    has anyone seen how many books stephen king has coming out in the next month or so. one is a sequel to the shining. odd for him to write a sequel and so many books at once is weird even for him. i wonder if his health is failing?

    Reply
  85. Louisianagurl said on March 20th, 2013 at 4:08 pm

    Camel/needle anyone?

    The new pope is known to be humble and has ALOT of housekeeping to do internally in the Vatican and around the world with the Catholic church in general. Most of the internal issues in the curia are money issues and the external issues are image…sound familiar? Maybe this is an opportunity for AJ/BP to clean out their own house and either move forward together or apart and live in more peace than they have in the past. This is definitely a “key time” for the church and with the crossed keys being the symbol of the Pope…the obvious comparison would be that AJ/BP will be or already are joined, hence AJP being her married name. The question is, will this couple use their power for good or evil. Will they live off of the back of their images or will they really do the right thing by each other and their children and become the humble servants they have so long pretended to be…hence the facade that HRH implied earlier. Time will tell.

    Foie Gras is what the French eat (what you are calling pate)…it is the fat of the Goose liver. Very decadent.

    Reply
  86. Guest2 said on March 21st, 2013 at 8:01 am

    @Louisianagurl:
    So the previous clue alluded to a breakup and now this key clue has us pondering a possible marriage with the ajp. Ian told Rush that they put on a big facade so maybe he is referring to all three of them. It’s really telling how good they all are at flying under the radar when they want to and it reinforces the notion to me that when they are papped it’s with their consent and maybe they all profit from the pics. But if jp did secretly get married why couldn’t Ian just come out and say it? And what I want to know is why aj hasn’t been seen in such a long time. For as long as I’ve followed this saga and even before she’s been a notorious attention seeker and now she’s just dropped out of sight except for one real and some rumored sightings. And no recent UN trips. What’s up with her? I can’t imagine this a well kept secret in HW.

    Reply
  87. Louisianagurl said on March 21st, 2013 at 4:52 pm

    @Guest2:
    your guess is as good as mine. That said…they are at least eternally bound by the children even if they are not married, so will be forever linked whether they like it or not. I do think that they are very calculating in how they present themselves in public and very much control their “Brand” …and when it comes to AJ and what she is up to, I have NO IDEA. At one time, I thought her cunning and very smart. She may or may not be, but she definitely has been quiet…just not sure if part of some master plan or some breakdown. I guess we will never really know until one of the kids grow up and write a tell all… :-)

    Reply
  88. Louisianagurl said on March 21st, 2013 at 4:53 pm

    @Guest2:
    …your guess is as good as mine. That said…they are at least eternally bound by the children even if they are not married, so will be forever linked whether they like it or not. I do think that they are very calculating in how they present themselves in public and very much control their “Brand” …and when it comes to AJ and what she is up to, I have NO IDEA. At one time, I thought her cunning and very smart. She may or may not be, but she definitely has been quiet…just not sure if part of some master plan or some breakdown. I guess we will never really know until one of the kids grow up and write a tell all… :-)

    Reply
  89. sociapathicmetaphor said on March 21st, 2013 at 5:54 pm

    http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/108974/Brad-Pitt-And-Angelina-Jolie-Spend-15-Million-On-Caribbean-Wedding
    So apparently they got married

    Reply
  90. sociapathicmetaphor said on March 21st, 2013 at 5:57 pm

    @sociapathicmetaphor:
    Nevermind they say in April

    Reply
  91. rushdog said on March 21st, 2013 at 6:27 pm

    Interesting on MIR

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=382937

    Reply
  92. Dream said on March 21st, 2013 at 6:43 pm

    @rushdog:
    omg i have never seen those mir houses before. mobile homes would have looked better than that. seriously no one realized how god awful ugly those houses were going to be?
    lol mrs winchester did better than pitt with her crazy house in california.
    and if anyone has never read the real story of the winchester mansion i recommend it. she was an amateur architect and her house had nothing to do with ghosts. she was way ahead of her time and an astute business woman. totally fascinating life story.

    Reply
  93. WCKitty said on March 21st, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    @Dream:
    Those houses are extremely ugly and they aren’t community/neighborhood friendly when it comes to their porches. They don’t fit in with the culture either. I don’t believe I have ever like anything Pitt has designed.

    I have heard a few stories when it comes to the Winchester Mystery House. The home’s webpage talks about ghosts, but maybe it done in order to sell tickets? I have driven by it many times and it is beautiful – at least from the outside and from what I have seen from photos. I have never been inside because I had a dream a long time ago where I was inside the house (that I’ve never been in and at the time had not seen any of the inside [before the Internet]) and I was trying to get out because the place was on fire. I’m also extremely claustrophobic, so not going inside.

    Reply
  94. Dream said on March 21st, 2013 at 9:08 pm

    @WCKitty:
    man those houses are ugly. i would rather live in a trailer park.
    winchester lady in a quick answer was not crazy, she did not think ghosts were after her. she was a very very rich woman whoes whole family had died in a short time. her only child husband and in laws. they left her a huge fortune. i think it came to 1000 dollars a week best i can remember. she had bad arthritus and wanted to start her life over so she moved to cali.
    she bought that property with a half finished victorian farm house on it. she planted an orchard adn had a working farm as well as beautiful gardens that were the envy of everyone.
    she loved architecture, she knew she would never work as one so she decided to learn it on her own. the house was in short her experiments to see what something she thought of would look like. she had the money to do it so she did.
    it says a lot that the men in the community came to her for business advice.
    she had a falling out with the town at one point and closed her house to the big parties she was known for throwing. she still had ice cream parties for the children tho.
    the weird looking house and her being a recluse led to the talk about her.
    some of the things in the house that people always point out. spiders- very common decoration during victorian times. her stair case with 2 inch risers and tiny rooms. she was less than 5 feet tall and was crippled. they were rooms on her scale. the windows between rooms were also common, most houses used transoms over doors but in walls was done too before central heating. also glass windows in walls let in light to interior rooms.
    if u can find anything on her other than the ghost stuff she was truly fascinating. way ahead of her time.

    Reply
  95. WCKitty said on March 21st, 2013 at 10:42 pm

    @Dream:
    I didn’t know all of that! :) I will have to read about her as she sounds like a very interesting woman. I love the style of Victorian homes and yes, she must have been a good architect if men came to her for advice (especially in those days). I wish I hadn’t had that dream, but I still can remember parts of it like it was yesterday. Since some of my dreams (while sleeping) have come true, I can’t go inside the house.

    On those ugly Pitt houses, I’d also rather live in a trailer park. Some of them actually look like real ugly trailers on stilts. I’d hate to be in one of those homes if a tornado came through. 8O

    Reply
  96. Dream said on March 22nd, 2013 at 2:17 am

    @WCKitty:
    Always listen to a premonition. Lol I had a recurring one about a green mustang I think it was a 68. Anyway I know nothing about cars so if I know something specific like that I listen to it. Had the same dream for years. One day my dad called me and said he found my dream car (as. In I would love it). Lol I went over to see it and sure enough it was my dream car. Sure did want to buy that car but I let it go.

    Reply
  97. Siska said on March 22nd, 2013 at 10:44 am

    @Mistory:thank you for it!
    Justin shave his beard…mmm, sign the wedding is soon?

    Reply
  98. Mistory said on March 22nd, 2013 at 11:13 am

    @Siska:
    Yay yay

    Reply
  99. WCKitty said on March 22nd, 2013 at 12:06 pm

    @Dream:
    LOL, it took several of those type of dreams for me to start listening to them. It must have been hard to let your dream car go! My step-mom had an old mustang (60-something) and I got to drive it a few times. I used to drool over a neighbor boy’s old really nice Chevelle SS. He probably thought I had a crush on him, but nah, it was his car. :lol:

    Reply
  100. WCKitty said on March 22nd, 2013 at 12:06 pm

    @Mistory:
    Thanks Mistory! :) Those are nice pictures of them!

    Reply
  101. Simms said on March 22nd, 2013 at 3:34 pm

    Perezhilton is saying Pitt is now wearing spandex to hide his belly. Too many late nite munchies? His face does look fuller! Maybe he will do a 7 day cleanse before the wedding.

    Reply
  102. Guest2 said on March 22nd, 2013 at 6:55 pm

    Please don’t get mad at me but I don’t like those pics of Jen. She looks silly and pretentious in that hat and with her lips pursed like that. She’s always looked so cool and casual but now it just seems try hard. I really wish she would be herself and stop posing for the paps. I hate that she’s playing this hollywood pap stroll game. Sorry, I had to get that off my chest. I think Justin looks good without the black leather, though. Again, sorry.

    Reply
  103. WCKitty said on March 22nd, 2013 at 9:29 pm

    @Guest2:
    I thought the pictures were nice, but I also noticed the lips. I believe I have seen her wear the hat before. I’m not a fan of hers and probably just watched one episode of Friends. I just don’t understand why some like to pick on her. I’m sure we see what she only wants us to see as with any celebrity. I don’t see her as phony as the other two in the triangle. I hope she doesn’t continue the lip look.

    Reply
  104. Guest2 said on March 23rd, 2013 at 7:40 am

    @eWCKitty:
    I like Jen and I don’t think she’s a phony. She’s been critical of the intrusiveness of the paparazzi and was even in that documentary on the subject. To me she looked uncomfortable being photographed as she always has. It’s like someone told her this is what she has to do and so she does it. Maybe this is what payal was talking about.

    Reply
  105. Guest2 said on March 23rd, 2013 at 7:52 am

    Did anyone see this at FF? According to the Sun (questionable source) pitt sold a share of the Miraval vineyard to the Perrin family and with the proceeds bought a yacht. Is that why he was on a shopping spree in Paris?

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=383231&sid=9fb33ac19ff842345d71799c0ea95a68

    Reply
  106. Kate said on March 24th, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    I understand what you are saying. I think with the state of our economy and the unstable situation in the Middle East people have become more suspicious in general of all media or. Does this sound familiar to you, “I once worked with Rock Hudson. If you want to sell a lie, get the press to sell it for you.”. Well, they did, it worked, and made history. Not the first time our government or the industry has used that tactic for the positive outcome they desired. In this case, an honorable one. In the case of this post , maybe not..I am inclined to agree with you that the sho is about Aniston Jolie Pitt, because of the last post and those references. I think more people ate waking up to this, with the exception of the ones who are angered by it. Weddings aside, wouldn’t you love to be able to go back and have a peek at a message board when Rock Hudson was getting married? The public, had no ideas. Certainly not those with the grottos! That is how well the press can sell a lie ;) I think the goodness in us wants to believe the best, and genuinely want couples , families to be happy. I am not a romantic, but that is what my hope would be for anyone. I don’t understand this mindset of anger, resentment, hate, towards either side anymore. 9 yearsII bet continues after they all marry, although I can’t imagine why when none of them are at that dame place. Totally baffles me.

    Reply
  107. Kate said on March 24th, 2013 at 2:49 pm

    This is literally blurry to me right now, (blog) that is the most unappetizing pate I have ever seen. At first I thought steak tartare because it is often served with 2 slices of french bread and a basket of ties, exactly as in that photo. I don’t eat meat, but have been present at dinners and thought, “ok I need to leave before I get sick”..but that does appear to be 3 different types of pate, herbs, mushrooms, (pot farm at CM) pate is made with wine, so that makes sense Rush..some believe French and Fries did originate there, some Belgium..I also wondered if the 3 shades of pate could be Mad, Pax, See, the bread Viv and Knox, and the Fries Shiloh. Or if it is just really 3 items Pate , representing what is being produced at CM, herbs and wine, (Brad) not sure though who the bread or the fries applyto but my guess would be , FB- Jolie, FF-Aniston. Th

    Reply
  108. Guest2 said on March 24th, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    @Kate:
    It would have been interesting to have gossip sites back then. I’m sure there were others wondering why RH always brought men as his dates to the Academy Awards. I remember the Marlborough Man did that too. I made excuses for him though cuz he was sooo cute, maybe a brother or cousin visiting from out of town, lol. It seems like more HW stars are doing the staged pap strolls, even Anne Hathaway. You wouldn’t think a talented, award winning actress would need to do it but maybe this is the hollywood of today. I don’t hate brangie, I really just wanted to see them knocked off their pedestal and now it’s happened. I have to admit that I am curious as to why we haven’t seen her in such a long time. It’s such a change from the past 8 years.

    Reply
  109. Kate said on March 24th, 2013 at 7:10 pm

    @Guest2:
    People tend to believe what they already do about things. It is hard for someone who has an emotional attachment to something to see something they do not want to. Wives do this all the time, teenagers do it about everything, politics, there is a huge resource of how we are manipulated. Every successful business to a degree learns to play to their clients emotions, that is all these stars are doing. How they really feel or o they are behind it all does not matter as much if they are just doing their job and are good at it. It is when they get personal with you they mess with the image. If the film is good , the acting, script, etc, I don’t care who is sleeping with who. There are a few exceptions , bc they have already ruined their image and they are not believable in any roll now. all I see is their mouth. I remember the day so many realized RH was hay, total shock. There are many from that eta that were and while they were not out, they did not really hide it either. I was always surprised some of them stayed a secret as long as they did. People see what they want to, and the media makes sure you see what they want you too. Has it been that long, wasn’t she at an event not that long ago. Then a day or so later they were seen together, and her hair was lighter. That was only a month ago, around Oscar time?

    Reply
  110. WR said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:03 am

    A late relative of mine lived in San Francisco. She was a poet and she attracted celebrities of all sorts. They told her a lot. She, in turn, once mentioned that Rock Hudson hung around a fairly close-by street where hustlers plied their trade. She named the “cheap” hotel where he checked in. She also told me about others, but it didn’t occur to me to ask for more information about who else.

    Reply
  111. WR said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:15 am

    That was a period where I wasn’t very good at the gaydar thing. I had friends who happened to be lesbians. I visited them, and a tv soap program came on. The dominant one took a look at an actor named David Canary, and declared, “That guy is gay!” I instantly replied, “No Way!…He’s married, with a grown daughter!”
    She didn’t bother to argue the point.

    Reply
  112. WR said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:18 am

    Today, at noon, world-wide, there were many prayers said for Mother Earth, that she be saved! I joined with the others. Hopefully, we will have made some difference!

    Reply
  113. Dream said on March 25th, 2013 at 2:33 am

    @Guest2:
    lol gerard butler has been known to bring his spiritual adviser with him to events. and people call me crazy for saying hes into guys.

    Reply
  114. Mistory said on March 25th, 2013 at 4:48 am

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/democraticrepublicofcongo/9951758/William-Hague-and-Angelina-Jolie-join-forces-for-anti-rape-drive.html

    William Hague and Angelina Jolie join forces for anti-rape drive
    William Hague and Angelina Jolie – back in November – are working together to try and end rape in warzones. The actress and mother-of-six has highlighted the plight of refugees worldwide for more than a decade in her role as a UN High Commissioner for …

    Reply
  115. Guest2 said on March 25th, 2013 at 6:51 am

    @Mistory:
    Thanks, Mistory. You answered my question of why we haven’t seen her. And just in time for the trailer.

    Reply
  116. Guest2 said on March 25th, 2013 at 6:53 am

    @Dream:
    Well, you have to give him credit for being original with “spiritual advisor”. I think he’s bi if Brandi Glanville is to be believed, lol.

    Reply
  117. Guest2 said on March 25th, 2013 at 7:01 am

    @WR:
    When I spoke of the marlboro man above I was referring to Tom Selleck. After doing some searching it looks like he never was the marlboro man but he was definitely on a billboard for something (I still drive by that billboard frequently and think of him) and I did see him at an awards show with a man. He is married with a daughter and lives on a ranch with them. He’s denied being gay but I don’t know if he’s denied being bisexual. He has a macho image to uphold.

    Reply
  118. Mistory said on March 25th, 2013 at 7:26 am

    @Guest2:

    I read from other sites that anige will stay in Congo for week !! So she break three days rule . LOL

    Reply
  119. Mistory said on March 25th, 2013 at 7:35 am

    @Guest2:

    Do you think that Angie want to steal spotlight from Jennifer’s wadding ?? I do

    Reply
  120. Mistory said on March 25th, 2013 at 8:32 am

    Photo ops start !! Anige arrival

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/foreignoffice/8588032063/sizes/l/in/photostream/

    Reply
  121. Mistory said on March 25th, 2013 at 11:37 am

    Anige wear wadding ring !!!http://www.popsugar.com/Angelina-Jolie-Wearing-New-Ring-Photos-28855621

    Reply
  122. Dream said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:06 pm

    @Guest2:
    i think most people are somewhat bi. most never act on it and are probably not drawn enough to the same sex to be interested in a relationship.
    hollywood is a permissive place, i guess if ur among people that dont judge and willing partners, its possible people act on feelings that they would not have even known they had otherwise. dont know how u can explain ancient greece otherwise.
    and i dont think its just sex in hollywood, its everything. people that would have lived in their hometown and went to the same church all their lives, question god in hollywood. people who would have never done more than smoke a joint turn into drug addicts.
    and gb’s boyfriend has a whole list of titles, among them personal trainer and nutritionist. lol i think that means guy who carries his booze. spiritual adviser, guy who makes him yell out god? lmao i had a good laugh at it when i saw the list. the last time i saw gb with his friend was the teen choice awards after 300. they arrived dressed alike and gerard was smiling. i have never seen him look so happy as he did that night.

    Reply
  123. Kate said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:36 pm

    @Mistory:
    I think the tabloids would like everyone to believe that, but in reality, these trips are set up well in advance , so unless Angelina has a day by day play of what Jennifer is doing , I would doubt that is this, but more as you suggested, PR for his film. I think everyone knew this is how it would be promoted, afterall, it is the role he is playing. Millions invested. They have to.jmo

    Reply
  124. Kate said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:40 pm

    @Mistory:
    So maybe the ajp was in reference to this..although I think.Ian would have made a bigger deal about it, but the again, why, we have a all the middle aged people getting.married, this is not Romeo and Juliet. Probably not then.

    Reply
  125. Kate said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:42 pm

    @Mistory:
    They look happy, good for them, no e to see that! Maddox has gotten tall, they look like they are having fun. Reminds me of my son a bit at that age. :)

    Reply
  126. Kate said on March 25th, 2013 at 1:48 pm

    @WR:
    Amen

    Reply
  127. Gest2 said on March 25th, 2013 at 2:07 pm

    @Mistory:
    Is she honeymooning in the Congo, lol?

    Reply
  128. Gest2 said on March 25th, 2013 at 2:09 pm

    @Dream:
    He tried so hard to play the role of ladies man. Too bad he can’t just be himself and enjoy his relationship out in the open. I guess the romantic leading man roles might dry up if he did?

    Reply
  129. Guest2 said on March 25th, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    If they did get married quietly good for them, it should have been done quietly. IF they got married, not convinced yet, then I understand why jen had to announce her forthcoming nuptials via People so it wouldn’t look like she was trying to upstage them. She has a stain on her shirt.

    http://www.popsugar.com/Angelina-Jolie-Wearing-New-Ring-Photos-28855621#/Angelina-Jolie-Wearing-New-Ring-Photos-28855621?image_nid=28855621

    Reply
  130. Dream said on March 25th, 2013 at 10:07 pm

    lol since its slow in here i gonna post something funny. hope it makes someone laugh…
    Anyone that knows me knows I have the worlds strangest dream. Last night was the weirdest I ever had.

    I was going home after a concert with friends in one of those morphing cars that show up in dreams, when one of my friends decided we needed candy. So we stopped a a railway station(most logical place to find candy) that was also an office complex. There was a huge candy store there that was on several levels. Huge glass containers of candy were very pretty.

    I went to take a number for the candy queue and I heard them call the next number it was 238 my number was 13 something. I decided it would take a while so I went out to my morphing car which was now a convertible being watched by a friend. My friend was being beat up by a gang member wanting money, so being the good friend I am I walked up and grabbed my purse out of the car leaving my friend to his beating.

    Later I noticed my car was missing so I went upstairs to call the police. The office I went into was a temp agency but that was just a front. In reality they created all kinds of futuristic stuff. I got to watch a cool gadget that was set to remember and repeat what ever had happened on a specific spot. I got to watch a candy bar be eaten by ants in time lapse. Very cool.

    I couldn’t figure out how to work the phone and it took me forever to get thru to the police. Finally I was offered the use of the best kick butt undercover spys in the building. Turned out they were the Old Navy manikins. their names were Lear Mango and Slut.

    They beat up the bad guys complete with the comic book bams and pows. Then I woke up. I wonder if I got my car back? I am sure my magic morphing car will show back up someday.

    Reply
  131. WR said on March 26th, 2013 at 4:57 am

    @Guest2:
    I’ve heard mostly that he’s gay. Myself, I haven’t anything. I did room at a home of a former studio worker not far from The Miracle Mile (The richest strip of real estate in the country/world) when I was taking classes at UCLA.

    Reply
  132. WR said on March 26th, 2013 at 5:10 am

    @WR:
    Sorry, having trouble with my situation at the computer.
    Anyway, my landlady had let a film crew use her property by the house for lunch breaks. She told me of the various stars in the neighborhood, as well as who owned whole floors of the nearby high rises. Many other things, like she saw Robert Redford jogging by her home. She also said that Tom Selleck owned a regular home nearby. This was before he made it big, she said.
    Incidentally, another tenant going to UCLA and renting a room, told me she was good friends with the sister of a rock star, David …something. He was the dark-haired lead singer of a group. He was big in his day. And he became a single performer. Not David Bowie; this guy is much younger.
    UCLA had many stars doing appearances there. David was one. Some student asked him why he was so weird, as I remember, at the question and answer session. He kinda brushed off the rudeness of the student by giving him a flippant reply.
    There’d invariably be filming going on as I walked to campus through the neighborhoods.

    Reply
  133. WR said on March 26th, 2013 at 5:21 am

    @Mistory:
    Yes, I do. She is a sociopath, and her fanatics post hate-filled messages targeting Jennifer Aniston. It couldn’t be more obvious. She could put a stop to these, but chooses to not do so.

    Incidentally, there was a report on 20/20 last Sunday about the steady rise in sociopaths among the young in America. I have observed milder evidence as I shop around my neighborhood. Not a widespread thing so far. Just evidence that some young people act like they don’t know right from wrong, and are under the influence of a stronger force for evil; usually someone close by. Others here have commented on this through their own personal experience.

    Reply
  134. WR said on March 26th, 2013 at 5:25 am

    @WR:
    It came to me: David Byrne.

    Reply
  135. Mistory said on March 26th, 2013 at 7:18 am

    Look here anige wear her engagement ring five weeks ago .
    http://www.popsugar.com/Angelina-Jolie-Brad-Pitt-Valentines-Day-Pictures-28044707?slide=2&image_nid=28045635

    But now she new ring and necklace
    Loons at JJ claim that brangelina married at Caribbean last year . Hhhh

    Everyone talk about the ring not about her humanitarian Mission !!!!! Hypocritical

    Reply
  136. Guest2 said on March 26th, 2013 at 8:14 pm

    @WR:
    I think you’re right about her. Her face always has that haughty vacant look with not even a glimmer of empathy. As Mistory said even a disturbing issue like violence against women and children in war has to be all about her. I wish the media would call her out on this more than they do. I missed the 20/20 show but there really does seem to be an increase in sociopathy and it’s frightening. You really never know when you’re path will cross with someone like that.

    Reply
  137. siska said on March 26th, 2013 at 9:05 pm

    @Guest2:why you have to say sorry? its your opinion,and everyone entitle of it.
    in that picture ,i understand why you think she look unnatural,she wore the hat before. i think she wore hat more since with justin. myabe she just want to hide her hair behind the hat..he.,he..i do that when i am lazy.
    i like justin when he wore casual clothes.

    Reply
  138. siska said on March 26th, 2013 at 9:06 pm

    @Mistory:he.,he..i think she is very clever in using her humanatarian job to also promote her image,its a win win situation. I can not fault her for it.

    Reply
  139. siska said on March 26th, 2013 at 9:08 pm

    @Mistory:they look like normal kids. happy and relax.. so i think the parent do ok with the kids.

    Reply
  140. siska said on March 26th, 2013 at 9:09 pm

    @Mistory:they will use their biggest photo op and maybe their big day to highlight brad big movie.

    Reply
  141. Capri said on March 26th, 2013 at 9:27 pm

    I’m going O/T. I’m lurk around daily and the site used to have a feature that if say the example above this post is Siska responding to a post of Mistory’s…..I could do the hover over the @Mistory in Siska’s post and briefly see Mistory’s post that Siska was referring to…..Understand that? :) I’m not getting the ‘vision’ of the original Mistory post anymore. Did Ian do away with that feature, or is it just me?

    Reply
  142. Guest2 said on March 26th, 2013 at 11:19 pm

    @Capri:
    I think it has to do with the browser. If you click on the box in the browser that is next to the refresh button it will change it to compatibility view and you should be able to see the original message. I think this feature only works with internet explorer though I don’t know that for sure.

    Reply
  143. Mistory said on March 27th, 2013 at 4:18 am

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/26/jennifer-anistons-jackie-brown-prequel_n_2957925.html

    Jennifer Aniston’s ‘Jackie Brown’ Prequel Role In ‘The Switch’ Made Director Cry

    Reply
  144. Capri said on March 27th, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    That did it!! Thanks very much Guest 2. I always wondered what that little box looking like jaggedy teeth was for :)
    Looks like She’s Baaaack! Peeked in at JJ before coming here and there’s a post that it’s back. I could have sworn that the loon at FF said she’d be gone a week. Must have put a crimp in her style when the wifey tagged along. ;)

    Reply
  145. Guest2 said on March 27th, 2013 at 10:30 pm

    @Capri:
    I never knew what it was either until another poster here clued me in a while back. They’re saying at FF that it’s his wife in the car with AJ but it doesn’t look like her to me. If it is maybe she wants to get in on the action :)

    Reply
  146. Capri said on March 27th, 2013 at 11:03 pm

    :) A poster at FF said that he likes the S&M. Maybe wifey wanted to make sure that no one spanks that butt except her.
    But Jolie is back. Party at the Roosevelt soon. Yee Haw!!
    Maybe she’ll be calling Ben to talk about all that she learned on her fact finding trip. I reckon Ben’s smarter than Pitt. Uh,what am I saying? Everyone’s smarter than Pitt. LOL

    Reply
  147. Mistory said on March 28th, 2013 at 5:43 am

    3/27/2013 7:05 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
    ANGELINA JOLIE
    WE’RE NOT MARRIED
    EXCLUSIVE
    Angelina Jolie has just made it crystal clear … she and Brad Pitt did NOT secretly get married.

    You’ll recall, Angelina swapped out her $500,000 diamond engagement ring for a simple gold band during a recent humanitarian trip to the Congo … probably so it wouldn’t get lost or stolen … but that didn’t stop everyone from speculating that she and Brad had wed on the DL.

    Nevertheless, Angelina put those rumors to rest once and for all today. Check out the video for her

    http://www.tmz.com/2013/03/27/angelina-jolie-ring-not-married-video/

    Reply
  148. Guest2 said on March 28th, 2013 at 10:07 am

    @Mistory:
    So she wore a wedding band just for the heck of it to get people talking about her instead of the issues that should have been discussed concerning her trip. Typical jolie stuff.

    Reply
  149. WCKitty said on March 28th, 2013 at 12:50 pm

    @Mistory:
    Did you read the comments that were posted? :)

    Reply
  150. Mistory said on March 28th, 2013 at 1:12 pm

    @WCKitty:
    They hate her !hehehe

    Reply
  151. WCKitty said on March 28th, 2013 at 1:53 pm

    @Mistory:
    They sure are on to her hypocrisy, games, and phoniness.

    Reply
  152. WR said on March 28th, 2013 at 3:56 pm

    I’m not counting on the loonies to catch on, however. They’d be adrift at sea, if it ever dawned on them that her history of lies, lies and more lies were not healthy.

    Reply
  153. WCKitty said on March 28th, 2013 at 4:06 pm

    @WR:
    You are probably correct. They appear to still believe that she gives a third of her income to charity and that she is a natural beauty.

    Reply
  154. WR said on March 28th, 2013 at 4:19 pm

    I’ve been mulling Ian’s Key Clue. Hard to figure. I know the passage it refers to, but there’s the pictured pope in all his resplendent glory. Could the clue refer to that? The popular notion is that the Vatican is overloaded with riches. Indeed, I saw a tv seg about the Vatican’s accumulated literary riches that would take an individual a lifetime to read. Hmm!
    The new pope is a follower of St. Francis; he, who eschewed family riches to be more Christ-like. Pope Francis is in the news about his poverty lifestyle vs. the usual pomp of the papacy. Wonder how it will progress.
    Anyway, Happy Easter to everyone!

    Reply
  155. Guest2 said on March 28th, 2013 at 7:50 pm

    @WR:
    Happy Easter to you too, WR, and to everyone else who celebrates. I am a wayward Catholic but I really do love this holiday. And Happy Passover to Ian and those who celebrate the holiday.

    Reply
  156. Guest2 said on March 30th, 2013 at 5:55 pm

    @sociapathicmetaphor:
    She had the money and powerful lawyers is what it came down to. I believe the screenplay is based on the book but I doubt she is the one who wrote it. This article says it all:

    http://www.bohomoth.com/?p=31466

    Reply
  157. Liz E. said on March 30th, 2013 at 8:20 pm

    I don’t think it was at all about money or powerful atttorneys. I hope no one is suggesting that this federal judge was somehow corrupted?

    As it turned out the case proved to be a fairly straightforward comparison of the book and the film. I found it curious that Braddock had never submitted an English translation of his book for the defendants and the court to assist them in their comparison. It was Jolie’s legal team that arranged and paid for the English translation. I believe the translation was just completed, available to the defendants and submitted by them to the court in February.

    Once you compare the two works – which really are very different stories that happen to share the same war – you can see that there are many differences. Even the similarities pretty much arise out of the fact that they both cover the same war and the rape camps. Anyone writing about that would share many similarities – but that kind of overplay is natural and unprotected by copyright – especially with historical facts.

    This kind of lawsuit is common in the industry. I always thought Braddock was a con on an ego trip.

    For those celebrating I hope you have a Happy Easter. It seems I still have eggs to color.

    Reply
  158. rushdog said on March 30th, 2013 at 9:14 pm

    @Liz E.:
    I would never suggest a federal judge was corrupted unless there was some definite proof of that. I also would not suggest someone who lived through the horrors of the former Yogoslavia was a con. I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt here and suggest he was a bit naive in his contacts with people. I don’t believe he was asking for that much money, certainly don’t recall it being over the top. Braddock’s filing stated that he met with Sarkik (sp?) to discuss his work (Braddock’s) and Sarkik’s interest in a movie. Also that Braddock forwarded information to MIR. IMO he may have felt his information was used because it was similar (though not similar enough!) and here he was the one that passed it along, yet that’s why he filed the lawsuit. He was in over his head in this…too hard to prove, he didn’t have any money, cultural differences…he was never going to win this.

    Reply
  159. rushdog said on March 30th, 2013 at 9:18 pm

    Happy Easter and Happy Passover to everyone. I notice that there are some regular posters who have not been posting. I’m wondering if it has to do with how Ian chose to represent what he had to say in this post. Miss them and others who have not been around in a while and hope everyone checks in soon.

    Reply
  160. rushdog said on March 30th, 2013 at 9:20 pm

    @Birdsfly:
    Welcome. I didn’t see either of your posts on my first or second read-throughs. Sometimes it takes a while to show up. I believe the pictures are both of Pope Benedict but the “Father of the Church” is interesting. The meal shown in the tweet photo definitely connects this post to France and by location, Mirival, imo.

    Reply
  161. Guest2 said on March 30th, 2013 at 9:50 pm

    @rushdog:
    I miss them too. There were some comments posted after Ian’s twitter reply to payal that the jen/justin relationship won’t last that might explain why some have taken a break. I’m not sure I fully understand the reasons but I do miss the “old timers” and hope they will come back. Thiat was not a reference to age, ladies :) Happy Easter/Passover.

    Reply
  162. rushdog said on March 30th, 2013 at 10:11 pm

    Since this thread is so short, lol, I’ve actually read it through a few times and noticed a few comments as a result.

    Guest1 – 2005-2013 – The Pope’s years as Pontif; the years the couple has been together; the years of the triangle from beginning to now.
    Togi – photocard shows two pics of an adult (younger and older), one behind a cross; one open arms to the public
    Liv4 – the church – sordid secrets
    LAgurl – the church concerns: internal – money; external – image
    Stella – greed
    Jaded – keys on the seal of the chair (keys to the kingdom)
    Kate – key Clue – “a piece of information that would unravel a mystery”
    WC Kitty (tweet photo) – 3 helpings of pate
    LAgurl – fat of the goose – very decadent
    Birdfly – Father of the Church
    Capri (tweet photo) two out of three legitimate

    There are a number of Funny Pope cards that represent hypocrisy and greed yet Ian chose this card. I believe hypocrisy and greed are a part of this post yet the inclusion of the poor from Africa in this selection points to the humanitarian work imo. Combined with the two pics – behind a cross and arms open to the public – suggest hiding behind and image. Add in the sordid secrets. People hiding behind their image to make sure their sordid secrets remain a secret. Their image is the key to their kingdom. Not sure if I think the humanitarian part is the image being used or a sordid secret. From previous riddles I lean toward it being both. Again, jmo. 2005-2013 the years of the couple and the media triangle. They hide behind the images, the facade, so nothing unravels.

    My tweet to Ian: key Clue to what?
    His reponse: huge facade they put on

    Tweet photo: French meal – pointing to the chateau ?
    Three helpings of pate – three? A J P (as in the scroll – Jesusajp)
    Pate – fat of the goose, very decadent – a luxurious self-indulgence…is often used to describe a decline due to an erosion of moral, ethical or sexual tradition
    Herbs and mushrooms on top of the pate – drugs (don’t see how it could mean anything else) sprinkled on top
    Bread – attached at one end, separated on the other – think this is the couple
    basket of fries – unauthentic, could the basket represent a cage? The bread is in the middle of the decadence and the basket. I wonder how many secrets are tied into the south of France.

    AJP – so how does the A, as in JA, fit into this (if anyone can make sense of what I’m typing, lol)…well she’s tied in if she’s a participant, or if she’s an investor, or if there’s a “prissy and pink” (I know…seems far-fetched but…), or by playing the game, or just by association.

    OK I’m just rambling at this point!

    Reply
  163. Capri said on March 30th, 2013 at 10:50 pm

    Happy Easter and Happy Passover to everyone.

    Reply
  164. rushdog said on March 30th, 2013 at 11:37 pm

    A couple other thoughts…

    Ian has used the clue phrase “fooling the bladder cops” (complete drug testing guide [frequently wanted info on beating drug tests]) three times:

    The first on the April 6th 2011 post “Paying the piper…” which was posted during or immediately after her humanitarian trip to Africa (Lybia, I believe).

    Second, on the 4/5/12 post “Abdominal Thrusts….” which was the post immediately prior to the promise for the future/engagement on the 4/13/12 unluckiest day of the year post.

    And the third, on the 1/1/13 post “Year of the Snake” which I believe is a post all about her – her public vs private life.

    During/after humanitarian trip, prior to the “engagement” and in the year of the snake.

    Also, Ian has used the phrase “french connection” once on the 10/5/11 post which I believe was just prior to when the gun prop shipment raid became public.

    I believe he also used it also on the 4/5/12 “Abdominal Thrust…” post in the second half of the title “…NYC’s Finest Parkcentral and Bahr Che.” Police, hotel and bar – all in The French Connection movie in which an actor uses their media attraction as a re-direct away from those who are smuggling.

    I’m just saying…images and secrets…

    Reply
  165. elby said on March 31st, 2013 at 10:48 am

    @rushdog:
    Brilliant deduction rushdog!

    Reply
  166. Guest1 said on April 1st, 2013 at 2:20 pm

    Blindgossip is at it again with another April Fool’s joke, at BP’s expense, again:

    “When adult celebrities choose to act in scandalous ways, we freely talk about it. However, when their children are involved, we are always a bit more hesitant.

    In this particular case, though, the way these parents are handling their children is so unusual that we think it is fair game to discuss it. No, they are not making them wear vials of blood around their neck! But it is still bizarre enough to warrant some attention.

    This celebrity couple has more than one child. One or both members of the couple has been married before, and not all of their children are biologically related to both parents. Their children have been raised in the spotlight, and one or more of the children has already started working in the entertainment industry.

    They would like their children to be married someday and to produce grandchildren. Pretty normal stuff, right? However, the way that they are going about it is both unorthodox and unsettling.

    A former employee told us that the couple has told staff: “The kids have been brought up with a very specific understanding of their role in this world. We expect them to marry someone who fits in so that they can support each other in that role. So we think it would be ideal if they paired off with each other and had children together to carry on the legacy we have created.”

    That’s right!. They are setting up their children to marry each other! To this end, the parents will be soon be purchasing property in the state of New Hampshire. Although they already own multiple homes, New Hampshire has the lowest marriageable age in the US (13 for the girl, 14 for the boy, as long as they have parental permission and a court waiver). As soon as both children are of age, they will be paired off and married to each other. Furthermore, they found out that if the daughter is pregnant, the court will certainly grant a waiver and that they can pull this off without a hitch. Although they will continue to live with the parents, the child couple will be encouraged to have as many children as possible in order to continue the family “legacy”.

    So far the children are going along with the plan. They have been carefully groomed to believe that this is a normal and natural arrangement. The whole family has often played “pretend wedding”, with the kids dressing us as bride and groom and going through a pretend ceremony. They do this so that when the time comes, they will be relaxed and ready to dash to the altar to do the real thing.

    Not everyone in the household staff is cool with this arrangement. One employee has quit and one has been fired in the past year because they believe that it is wrong to force the children to do this, and they have threatened to report the parents to Child Services.

    If you are wondering if both parents support this plan, the answer is yes. The woman is so dominant in this relationship (in more ways than one) that the man simply goes along with whatever she says.”

    No comments yet, but last year many readers too the bait. This has to be a joke!

    Reply
  167. Mistory said on April 1st, 2013 at 3:18 pm

    @Guest1:
    I hope it is April fool cuz it disturbing

    Reply
  168. Guest1 said on April 1st, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    @Mistory:
    Yes, I hope it is an April fools joke, one that is in very bad taste.

    Reply
  169. Guest2 said on April 1st, 2013 at 3:44 pm

    @Guest1:
    I’m sure it’s an April Fool’s joke, they’ve done them about brangie in the past but like you said in very bad taste. Interesting that almost everyone guessed brangie.

    Reply
  170. Guest2 said on April 1st, 2013 at 3:48 pm

    @Mistory:
    So they both happened to be in Santa Barbara on the same weekend but in separate photos. Do they have a house there? I can’t figure those two out for the life of me. Are they together or have they split and why does she keep wearing that wedding band? He was wearing a gold band on his left hand but middle finger in Paris. I think they like to mess with us, did they or didn’t they type thing because it keeps the attention on them.

    Reply
  171. rushdog said on April 1st, 2013 at 4:27 pm

    @elby:
    Thanks elby. Was trying to get a few things out of my head. Forgot to add the verse: And Jesus said…go give everything…

    Jesus tests the young man who says he is following the commandments, but the young man can’t let go of the money and lifestyle. He does not follow the commandments.

    They present a public image contrary to their private life and they can’t let go of the lifestyle.

    Ian’s tweet “the final fury” then the BS breakup lines post which imo indicated a public end then the tweet “too much bacon grease”…it was all arranged, halfway there and it didn’t taste right (didn’t feel right). JMO

    The facade will continue.

    Reply
  172. rushdog said on April 1st, 2013 at 4:31 pm

    @Guest2:
    Yes in very bad taste and lengthy too. The “blood vials” gives it away early in the blind. Wonder what the point in typing all of that if it is an April Fool’s joke.

    Reply
  173. rushdog said on April 1st, 2013 at 4:44 pm

    @Guest2:
    I think they’re completely done privately and the gold band was just to keep the wedding in the media. The facade. IMO he finally said “over” totally last fall. Outside of the 2/14 parking lot photos there have been no public photos in months.

    I believe after Shi’s birth they lived in Santa Barbara, possibly? Could be wrong on that cuz I wasn’t following this back then. But I recall reading that he owned property where there was a lot of land but the driveway was too short. This is when the paps were hanging out at the end of the driveway in droves and it was reported in the tabs that the paps said they could hear fighting every night. That’s what caught my attention in whatever I read back then. And then they moved to Los Feliz where it’s more secluded. So maybe he still owns that property?

    Reply
  174. WCKitty said on April 1st, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    @Guest1:
    +1 It sure is in bad taste!

    Reply
  175. WCKitty said on April 1st, 2013 at 5:12 pm

    @Guest2:
    Brad supposedly has a home there that was bought when he was with Jen. Angie was photoed with two of the children coming out of a Michaels store. According to some tweets, Angie was actually at the store on Thursday, but the photos were released to coincide with the picture of Brad with the children. Here is the link to pictures of the place and some info provided (which may be correct) by a poster.
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=384746&start=60

    Reply
  176. guest3 said on April 1st, 2013 at 5:18 pm

    @Rushdog

    Why do think Brad/Angie, Beyonce/Jay-z. Tom and Gisele are named forbes most powerful couples? They don’t need each other or money to be powerfu/wealthy. Let’s applaud our women, although they are married or partnerned with some powerful men in the industry they can carry their own. All three have their own identity, and are rich and powerful.
    They can support their children without their partner, they can strive in their careers, without their partners, they can earn a living , without their partners. And it goes vice versa.. The men don’t need them as sugar mommies. Love these couples!!

    Reply
  177. Mistory said on April 1st, 2013 at 5:29 pm

    @Guest1:
    Ewwww, it is not April fool,yuk

    Reply
  178. Guest2 said on April 1st, 2013 at 8:43 pm

    @Mistory:
    I’m certain tomorrow it will be revealed as an April Fool’s joke. It’s unimaginable it could be anything else but it’s shocking that they would write something like that, even in jest. I wonder why they did it.

    Reply
  179. Togi said on April 2nd, 2013 at 12:38 pm

    I’m not even going to hope it is an April Fool’s “joke” because jokes are funny. This is NOT funny and it pisses me off, big time. Leave the dang kids out of this crap media-type people! Unless, of course, someone is going to have the guts to actually SAY SOMETHING clearly and go to the officials with it. Grrrrrrrrrrrr. Children should be off limits, whether or not their parents parade them or not. The kids are innocents.
    @Guest2:

    Reply
  180. Guest2 said on April 2nd, 2013 at 1:41 pm

    Just in case anyone was wondering if the crazy loon BS that used to come here dropped off the face of the earth, I’m sorry to report she’s alive and wreaking havoc at Boho’s site. There certainly is a lot of loon activity lately at FF and now this.

    http://www.bohomoth.com/?p=31641

    Reply
  181. Guest2 said on April 2nd, 2013 at 1:46 pm

    @Togi:
    It was revealed as an April Fool’s joke but as you said it wasn’t funny and was in extremely bad taste. I’m baffled as to how anyone could write something like that about anyone’s children.

    Reply
  182. Togi said on April 2nd, 2013 at 2:38 pm

    If I was BP and AJ (which thankfully, I am not) I would go after that SOB. No “joke” there. I tell you, this kind of thing REALLY angers me. Double grrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
    @Guest2:

    Reply
  183. Capri said on April 2nd, 2013 at 8:03 pm

    @Guest2:
    Spring breakers working for a few bucks? Seems like the posting increases in waves. I expect a few recognizable new voices to decrease a lot once break is over and increase again in early summer.

    I think you’re right. BS has several nicknames at FF and is probably the beligerant at boho.

    Reply
  184. Capri said on April 2nd, 2013 at 8:36 pm

    @Guest2:
    As you both said, it was eye popping bad taste, a horrified gasping of disbelief type of blind.
    Sometimes I wonder about the zenmaster. I admit I am one suspicious nut, but it can’t have escaped his notice how many non fans or fence sitters defend JA against brand’s loons more OTT pronouncements. I have believed that the loons actually brought more fans to JA who might not have paid attention to her among all those of her genre. Liking doesn’t always bring support and she has support in the industry and the public, I think a good portion because of the loons, the media and the brand activities.
    Brand support is at an all time low. Brand hasn’t had an original thought since Trevor or gyer made a humanitarian and the I want babies excuses for bad behavior.
    If attacking actually helped JA, will that work again.
    I know it is a far fetched theory :) And I dislike the Brange and seldom cut them any slack, I admit it. But that blind was CRAZY….why so OTT? I know I am equally OTT with the suspicions and always directed at the zenmaster and that sneaky piece. But look at the nice people like you and Togi who are fired up about it…and that oldest is being groomed for an acting career.
    Can that sympathy….ploy, for want of a better word,….work again?
    Gee, I’m wordy today. I’ve been with the grandson all day, I guess I wanted to hear my voice saying more than show mammaw what you want, or NoNoNO, etc. ;) Thanks for letting me run at the mouth.

    Reply
  185. Dream said on April 2nd, 2013 at 10:05 pm

    @Capri:
    if thats blind gossip guy , he does it every yr. the impression i have of him is he is a angie fan and likes to stir up the anti’s.
    also his site is very boring, and tightly moderated. not much fun to read there. give me cdan anytime. i dont care if his blinds are true or not, hes jsut fun to read adn i like reading the replys. he appears to not like jen, but hes not usually over the top about it.

    Reply
  186. Capri said on April 3rd, 2013 at 9:12 pm

    @Dream:
    I agree about Enty, he’s fun….and he was one of the first to call the brand addicts. He and MK both, at the time of the Cannes IB promotions. Both of them didn’t beat around the bush…said pretty much came right out that the brand had the heroin greasy shine or sweat. I don’t remember the exact wording but I remember being shocked that both were so candid. At that time most media types still ignored the signs unless it was celebs like Lilo.

    Reply
  187. guest 3 said on April 3rd, 2013 at 9:47 pm

    I still want that drug that Angie/Brad is on.. They manage to accomplish many things that most non-drug addicts can’t accomplish. Buy $60 mil estate sin France, produce a successful winery, Direct movies ( didn’t Angie just land a second Directing Gig?), star in /produce $100 million budgeted movies, set-up girls schools in the third world countries, build homes in NO, raise six children, gets invites to the White House to discuss their cause, Meet with Prime Ministers/ head of states around the world, fly airplanes, ride motorcycles. . They are the most functioning /successful drug addicts in the world. If you’re interested, Angie will be speaking tomorrow at International Women’s summit in NYC along with Oprah and Meryl Streep. She will actually be giving an award to the young girl that almost died for carrying a book. But that’s what a drug addict can do.. Fox news tried to find some dirt on JP foundation. Guess what? couldn’t find anything.. Nada. All legit. Comparing a Lindsay Lohan who has about 10 mugshots to a 37 years old woman with six children, who at the same age was raising an 1 year old son really shows your ignorance.

    Reply
  188. WR said on April 4th, 2013 at 2:47 am

    How about it, Ian? Give us more about The Brand. Are they addicts who can accomplish all that? Maybe you can explain to us why the kids are the most miserable looking kids one can remember seeing. Are they being raised by the Brand or by nannies. If they are being raised by nannies, this would be very important news you could tell us, because, Ian, raising children right is the most important thing there is. One can conquer the world, but to fail at raising children right negates all the accomplishments one can achieve.
    Do you remember Jackie Kennedy Onassis saying that very thing? And she did raise very healthy children, considering all, didn’t she?
    Ian, I am not impressed by the litany of accomplishments cited on this board. I would be impressed if The Brand spent more time with the children. You see, Ian, I see a conflict right there. It takes a helluva lot of effort and time to raise six kids. One has to be there for them AT ALL TIMES! They take priority, and that means that one has to tear themself away from charity chic, accumulating wealth, and photoshopping; writing screenplays (while claiming that one was ill with the flu); dismissing the difficulty of directing a movie, and a host of other activities that require time and effort. Family should come first. Then, one can have a happy brood of smiling children.
    Ian, it is a crazy time we are living in, when the Brand is set up as something to be admired. JMO!

    Reply
  189. Guest2 said on April 4th, 2013 at 8:04 pm

    I miss the old days when lots of people came here and we had interesting conversations about lots of different things. Now even the old faithfuls seem to have gone too. I wish they would come back. UTC, Pattyanne, Tetta, Kate, Jan, Joanne, Selfrighteouswhore where did you all go? Ian, where did you go?

    Reply
  190. Violet said on April 4th, 2013 at 8:33 pm

    @Guest2:
    Sad, isn’t it.

    Reply
  191. Guest2 said on April 4th, 2013 at 8:50 pm

    @Violet:
    It really is. I was just looking at the pics of jolie at the Women’s Summit. She’s dressed in the strangest outfit I’ve seen on her and in this pic one of the handlers is stepping on her “train”. He’s lucky she didn’t deck him judging from the look on her face.

    http://www.justjared.com/photo-gallery/2843350/angelina-jolie-women-in-the-world-gala-at-lincoln-center-11/

    Reply
  192. Capri said on April 4th, 2013 at 9:53 pm

    @WR:
    Well said, WR.

    Reply
  193. Guest2 said on April 4th, 2013 at 10:25 pm

    Interesting post and comments about Natalie Wood’s death from CDAN. Himmm tells the story of what really happened that night. Sounds plausible to me.

    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2013/04/natalie-wood-saw-robert-wagner.html

    Reply
  194. WR said on April 5th, 2013 at 12:50 am

    @Guest2:
    Marti Rulli, the author of GOODBYE NATALIE-GOODBYE SPLENDOUR has a web site and discusses this:
    http:www.martirulli.blogspot.com/

    Reply
  195. WR said on April 5th, 2013 at 1:22 am

    She’s also on Twitter and Facebook.

    Re: Natalie’s death. In the book, they found Natalie covered with black and purple marks all over her body. She looked “like she had been in a boxing ring”. This couldn’t have come from bumping onto a rubber dinghy.
    She had been deathly afraid of water. Many fans and readers couldn’t comprehend why she’d go by herself in night clothes to the dinghy, as reported.
    In another book, it stated that Natalie’s first marriage was ended right after she caught him in bed with a man. As time progressed, the memory faded but she’d not commit to remarriage unless he promised to never again make it with another man. He allegedly solemnly promised.
    Her mother tried to warn Natalie about Wagner. As a mother, she had very bad feelings about him and didn’t trust him with her daughter.
    In the other book, Natalie complained to Robert Wagner about an effeminate employee who was too close to RW. RW refused to let him go. (It should be noted that in the ’50s, brand new star, Robert Wagner was close to the effeminate major star, Clifton Webb.)
    There was a brief report on the internet, which has disappeared. It claimed Wagner was involved in a murder in his youth. (He is from a rich family background, according to reports. The feeling is that a rich kid would get away with it because of any high-powered lawyer hired by his father.) (Although I’m reporting this, I have to see more, much more, before I could believe it.)
    Also, he orchestrated the initial investigation into Natalie’s death in 1981. Starry-eyed lawmen let him go back to the mainland in a plane before a thorough investigation could be held at Catalina Island.
    He more recently made statements about cooperating with the law which were just not true. He has not cooperated after making a public self-aggrandizing statement.
    Rulli’s book was written with the help and cooperation of Splendour’s captain, Dennis Davern. He reportedly had had such a guilty conscience over the decades, knowing what he knows. It also reports that Wagner immediately worked on him to buy his silence.

    My personal suspicion almost from the beginning, was that Natalie caught him and Walken in bed together.

    Reply
  196. Guest2 said on April 5th, 2013 at 9:42 am

    @WR:
    That’s my suspicion as well and I think she threatened to out him which I think Himmm mentions in his story. He gives some background on wagner’s gay background and how he convinced Natalie that he only slept with men to advance his career and that’s how he got Natalie back. It should be noted that Himmm tells the story as a hollywood fairy tale and doesn’t mention names. The only thing he says that I don’t quite believe is that wagner has a guilty conscience to this day about what happened. He doesn’t explain why wagner wouldn’t allow the Coast Guard to be called in to save Natalie.

    Reply
  197. Guest2 said on April 5th, 2013 at 9:55 am

    Omygosh, look at this photo of aj from last night. Her dress is see through and you can see her underwear. The woman is a pig. It’s also a good view of the man stepping on her “train”. Maybe she recycled her wedding dress.

    http://www.bohomoth.com/?p=32043

    Reply
  198. Violet said on April 5th, 2013 at 1:38 pm

    @Guest2:
    Yes, and she’s Pitt-less once again, too. I agree with Rushdog. I think these two are kaput personally. Think I see the engagement ring in the pic, though. I imagine she still wears it as an example of the pretentious, overpriced artsy crap her jewellery line will be comprised of.

    Reply
  199. Violet said on April 5th, 2013 at 1:41 pm

    @Guest2:
    I’m surprised she wears underwear. But I guess at 37 we all start to shift and droop a little. Maybe she’ll “design” a line of tat underwear. It’ll be called “Tit for tat.”

    Reply
  200. Kate said on April 5th, 2013 at 3:29 pm

    @Guest2:
    That is so nice of you to say G2. I don’t know about all the others because I have not been online, but I am still dealing with a health issue with my child. Just very stressful. Ian, I believe is also dealing with a personal issue. I am sure when he is in the mind set he will jump back in. :) Hope everyone is doing well!

    Reply
  201. Guest2 said on April 5th, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    @Kate:
    Nice to see you again, Kate. It’s fun here when there are a lot of people especially now that our favorite gossip subject is giving us such good material to work with.

    I hope your child’s health issue will improve and I hope Ian’s personal issue will be resolved.

    Reply
  202. Guest2 said on April 5th, 2013 at 4:10 pm

    @Violet:
    :lol:

    Reply
  203. Dream said on April 5th, 2013 at 6:28 pm

    @Guest2:
    add stella to that list. i miss them all. i miss all the different points of view.

    Reply
  204. Dream said on April 5th, 2013 at 6:33 pm

    @Kate:
    i hope all is well kate.
    i think we all assume people are jsut busy when we first miss them.

    Reply
  205. Violet said on April 5th, 2013 at 6:53 pm

    http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-moms/news/angelina-jolies-youngest-son-knox-looks-all-grown-up-at-fao-schwarz-visit-201354
    Shopping sans Pit-i-ful at FAO Schwartz.
    Where’s that fork? ’cause Sansabelt Brad and his Rode Hard and Hung up Wet girlfriend are done….and doner.

    Reply
  206. Guest2 said on April 5th, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    @Dream:
    Yes, Stella and Siska, Payal and too many more to mention. I’ve noticed some come here only when there’s a new riddle to work on. I only mentioned those few because they seemed to be here on a regular basis. UTC and her one-liners always crack me up and she links to some pretty good videos. And SRW was so smart and moved so fast I could barely keep up with her but always something interesting to learn from her. But things change and nothing stays the same, I guess.

    Reply
  207. Dream said on April 5th, 2013 at 10:02 pm

    @Guest2:
    i know, i was hesitant to add stella cause i know i am leaving out a bunch of people. miss so many people i could never list them all

    Reply
  208. Guest1 said on April 5th, 2013 at 10:19 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate, sorry to hear you are still dealing with the health issue with your child. I will keep you, your child and your family in my thoughts and prayers.

    Reply
  209. Guest1 said on April 5th, 2013 at 10:33 pm

    @Guest2:
    Where has UTC been? I miss her, I always like her posts. I hope she and her family are ok. I originally thought UTC meant up the east coast, as I live in CT. I would prefer to live where she lives, Ojai Ca., if I remember correctly. Thankfully1 we are entering the beginning of nice weather in CT and the surrounding states.

    Reply
  210. Stella said on April 5th, 2013 at 11:04 pm

    Thank you Guest 2 and Dream!!

    Miss you all and hope you’re all healthy, happy and have an abundance of love!!

    Been busy on my end with work and the whole college thing with my daughters, it’s been crazy fun and scary!! Love you guys.xxxxxx

    _8888888888____________________
    ____888888888888888_________________
    __888888822222228888________________
    _88888822222222288888_______________
    888888222222222228888822228888______
    888882222222222222288222222222888___
    8888822222222222222222222222222288__
    _8888822222222222222222222222222_88_
    __88888222222222222222222222222__888
    ___888822222222222222222222222___888
    ____8888222222222222222222222____888
    _____8888222222222222222222_____888_
    ______8882222222222222222_____8888__
    _______888822222222222______888888__
    ________8888882222______88888888____
    _________888888_____888888888_______
    __________88888888888888____________
    ___________8888888888_______________
    ____________8888888_________________
    _____________88888__________________
    ______________888___________________
    _______________8____________________

    Ian:

    Baby cakes, new clue!!!! xxxx ;)

    Reply
  211. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 7:25 am

    @Stella:
    Nice to see you again. I first read your post as there was a new clue and actualy went to look for it! Oh well, soon I’m sure.

    Reply
  212. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 7:30 am

    @Guest1:
    I’d like to live where she is too though the nice weather is starting in our area and it looks like we may actually have a nice Spring this year (I’m in MA). I’ve read UTC’s comments at another site so waiting for her to come back here.

    Reply
  213. guest3 said on April 6th, 2013 at 10:57 am

    They are the most miserable looking kids? No they are not.. When the paps keep their distance. or the children doesn’t notice them. those children are laughing and smiling.. Did you see Ben A. almost kicking a pap? He said his daughter became frightened ( you can clearly see Seraphina crying in his arms) when too many paps came too close to his daughter. Jen G just spoke about how people are paid to tip the paps off. If they know your schedule, you’re in trouble. A photo an “A list”family is worth more than 100 photos of reality star or D-C list celebrity. A photo of the JP family (they are international celebrity couple) is worth more than a Jessica Alba and family. They can sell those photos around the world, as opposed to families that are well-known or famous just in the US.

    Reply
  214. guest3 said on April 6th, 2013 at 11:11 am

    One last point… Isn’t obvious that these anti JP sites know nothing about the family??. Boho didn’t even know that Jp’s no longer owned their Malibu property but ,she can tell you what goes on in their home. If you don’t where the family lives, how can you tell viewers what goes on in their household??

    Reply
  215. Dream said on April 6th, 2013 at 11:16 am

    @Stella:
    good to see u again stella. i am glad u checked in. i know people get busy and i am not a priority. sounds like life is hectic but nice for u. i am glad.

    Reply
  216. guest3 said on April 6th, 2013 at 11:24 am

    If you don’t know where the family lives, how can you tell veiwers what goes on in their households??? What’s so strange that it was newsworthy that they sold their property to Ellen D couple of years ago. They don’t even do their research when spouting lies. Star and Enquirer , just meet their writers in person and they will tell you that 90% of articles on “A listers” are made up. Actually use their fingers to indicate how much is truth.

    Reply
  217. Patty Anne said on April 6th, 2013 at 3:00 pm

    Hello all. So finally AJ is giving us something to talk about, hmmmmm, like see-thru dress with visable t-strap underwear? Yikes, how classy..lol I think it’s about over with, both of them having made their decisions on their separation in 2010, and all attempts for another return to their glory days just brings a Ho-Hum. Nothing lasts forever, and they need to accept that and focus on the kids, family, and income. I think they will, but not happily. They both loved all the adoration of their loons for as long as they had a huge group of them. The screams of 5 do not eacho in halls like their former numbers.

    Wonder when Jen’s wedding will be and if we’ll see photos of her dress? We barely got half a glimpse of her first wedding gown. Hearing good vibes about the EL project. I think I’ll go to the theater for that one.

    Computer crashed, McAfee Techs got me going , but heaven’s to glory! Nothing is the same, all my settings are changed and I hate the way it is now. If I disappear, it’s because I’m now doing my own adjustments….grrrrrrrr

    Reply
  218. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 3:22 pm

    @guest3:
    Angie travels with her own photographers and feeds rumors to the tabloids so what you’re saying is nonsense. These are famehos who sold pictures of their children for millions of dollars to celebrity tabloids mags. They’re in no position to complain. Besides, if they were stalked by the paps as you suggest how do they manage to fly under the radar until it’s time to promote themselves for whatever they need to promote, jewelry line, movies, wine. How coincidental; they’re a couple of phonies. You should wake up and see the truth of how these celebrities play people like you.

    Reply
  219. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 3:32 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Hi Patty Anne, welcome back, we missed ya. I had computer crash problems that someone fixed for me but like you said nothing’s the same and it still works kinda funky. Computers can be a pain but what would we do without them, certainly not chat here.

    Yes, that see-thru dress was something else. Surprised so few commented on it. She seems to be out there advertising her wares this past year. Wonder what it means. Not convinced they’ve split but I wonder if maybe brad’s taking advantage of the open relationship with a much younger chicklet and all she’s got is old-goat billy bob (if the rumors she puts out there are true).

    Reply
  220. Patty Anne said on April 6th, 2013 at 4:41 pm

    Well, it seems to me that she is creating a new personna to warp into. Remember this woman is a master at reinventing herself. All the recent stories about Bad Brad, and about her cheating on Brad with BBT are a part of her new image I think. She has too much control over what’s put out there for it to be otherwise, so this is serving some sort of purpose only she knows.@Guest2:

    Reply
  221. Tetta said on April 6th, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    At last there are some news about Brangelina so we can discuss what´s going on. My guess is that Angelina plans to be a minister of foreign affairs sometimes in the future. Wouldn´t that be nice ? ! And the dress she wore the other day, she must have taking it from the wardrobe she used in the Disney movie last year. She can´t stop herself from being a bit of a naughty girl with a see through dress at the same time she tries to talk about a very serious matter. Angelina never disappoints us. As soon as she appears she manages to do or wear something we need to vent.

    Reply
  222. Patty Anne said on April 6th, 2013 at 6:01 pm

    True Tetta. I suppose one could say she thinks that is all she has to offer the world – controversy and accusations. There was no way any number of people didn’t see that dress was too sheer to wear to that event, and it was even more disgraceful on Angie’s part because of the reason for the event. Once again, all the press about it was about Angelina Jolie and her see-through dress which shoed her underpants. Oh goody-goody kids, read all about your momma in this mornings paper. Bad on Angie’s part. At least she took two out to Schwarts for toys recently, and I’ve never seen another photo since birth of Knox looking so happy and having FUN!@Tetta:

    Reply
  223. Patty Anne said on April 6th, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    Okay, back to Windows Vista For Dummies and the appearance and perference section…argh!!

    Reply
  224. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 6:27 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Brad must be so proud of the gift of a mother he gave his children.

    Reply
  225. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Whatever you do, don’t upgrade to windows 8. I bought a new laptop before this one crashed because I thought it couldn’t be fixed and I needed one for work. I hate using the new one because windows 8 is so different and harder to work with so I’m back on my old clunker.

    Reply
  226. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 6:33 pm

    @Tetta:
    Well, she certainly was dressed for affairs of all kinds, foreign and domestic. Nice to see you again, Tetta.

    Reply
  227. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    @Guest2:
    I should have said after this one crashed.

    Reply
  228. Up the Coast said on April 6th, 2013 at 6:51 pm

    @Guest1:
    @Guest2:
    Hi Guest 1 and 2 :) I’ve missed everyone also…but there has been nothing going on here :( and it felt like we were all holding the “tent” up ourselves…and for what? IDK. I needed a break, plus it was tax time ;)
    I don’t know what to say about joLIE that hasn’t already been said, everywhere else. She is so transparent, and so is that dress! :lol: It makes me sick that she is using Malala to shine a light on herself…I would like to punch her in the face :evil: stupid ho.

    Reply
  229. Up the Coast said on April 6th, 2013 at 7:08 pm

    Anyone else been watching the Jodi Arias trial? She is an evil predator, imo. Real victims of abuse that just “snap”, don’t plan it out in advance :roll: duh.

    Reply
  230. Patty Anne said on April 6th, 2013 at 7:10 pm

    Thanks for that tip. I”m perfectly happy with the way Vista works, and I’m just getting to know my way around tweeking it to suit my personal preferrences so I’d hate to begin again with another OS. DIL has 8 and says it’s like her iPhone….huh? lol As long as I can keep this one functioning, I’ll stick with it. @Guest2:

    Reply
  231. Patty Anne said on April 6th, 2013 at 7:13 pm

    How well I understand that UTC. When it just sits there with nothing going on, it’s best to take a break and return refreshed and ready for new stuff. Now it seems Angie is hell bent to give us a selection of scandals/rumors to keep talk about her ongoing for at least another day. She’s so painfully obvious these days. Pity too, she once had so much in her favor back in the Maddox and TR days. She and Pittiful did not do any favors for one another imo, they were like a shooting star burning brightly for a short while then burning out to vanish from the stars.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  232. Up the Coast said on April 6th, 2013 at 7:43 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    It won’t be long…she’ll be able to come and go as she pleases. :) I don’t know how many paparazzi normally stand outside of FAO Schwarz, just waiting for a celebrity to come along ;) but I know that they do not stand around the Michael’s in Santa Barbara :roll: So somebody had to plan ahead. They also don’t hang around the beach (or in a boat). I think joLIE is playing this “game” with Brad, everytime they switch-off with the kids.

    Reply
  233. Patty Anne said on April 6th, 2013 at 7:59 pm

    Now that makes sense. You could keep a chart of his times vs her times and it would be very clear who has them when. At least they are sharing the kids….with the nannies.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  234. Up the Coast said on April 6th, 2013 at 8:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Those poor nannies ;) I can’t wait till one of them writes a book!

    Reply
  235. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 8:28 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    It’s nice to see you again. Yes, we are holding up the tent as you say but my reasons are purely selfish because I enjoy the chats. Maybe you and Patty are right, though, that when nothing is going on here it’s best to take a break. Do you know if brad owns a place in Santa Barbara? I can’t remember which site (boho?) had a photo of the house he supposedly owns or owned at one time. She certainly did make it look like they all spent Easter together with the Michael’s trip. The pics at FAO Schwartz were incredibly awkward with Pax turning away from her and not wanting her to touch him. She’s despicable.

    Reply
  236. Up the Coast said on April 6th, 2013 at 9:10 pm

    @Guest2:
    You too…xoxox I thought he bought a place in SB when he was married to Jen…I also thought it was on the ocean side of the freeway, but recently I learned it’s on the other side and it’s past SB, next to El Capitan Ranch. (so I could be totally wrong).

    Reply
  237. Stella said on April 6th, 2013 at 10:03 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    Hate tax time too……….. 8O

    Reply
  238. Guest2 said on April 6th, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Someone at FF said that one of the kids on the beach belonged to marianne pearl (not sure how they would know that) so I wonder if she lives in SB and they or he were visiting her.

    Reply
  239. Kate said on April 6th, 2013 at 11:52 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    That is an interesting observation because FAO itself is a place visitors flock to. I have never seen any paps there, ever, but I have seen many tourists taking their own photo. I love that store. Brings the kid out in everyone. I was reading up at some of the comments on that April’s Fool Blind by Ace. I read through it, and the update. Not only does Ace highlight that his last several years of April Fool’s are all Brangelina related, but this year he is promoting the charity, asking people to make a donate. What do you think came first? An angry Brange , thus the link to a worthy cause, or the trashy vulgar blind to get everyones attention? Then the request for the donation? If it was the distasteful blind first,, who would no onboard with it ? Angelina, Brad? He has a movie to promote a has pulled some odd pranks with Jackass in the past, she has a history with her brother. All right before promotions are beginning on their pet projects. Does Brange allow Ace liberties with them.to keep their names out of his other blinds. I think so. I can’t see the zenmaster ignoring suggestions like that about the children. They had to be in on it. Imo :)

    Reply
  240. Kate said on April 6th, 2013 at 11:55 pm

    @Guest1:
    Long year behind and ahead, thank you, but God Bless Rick Warren, his son committed suicide. Praying for his family. So horribly sad. Life can be hard. :(

    Reply
  241. Kate said on April 6th, 2013 at 11:59 pm

    @Dream: I know, and the more hardships one is facing I think the they really care about the games these people play.It is a distraction, to share with friends at best. :)

    Reply
  242. Kate said on April 7th, 2013 at 12:15 am

    That should read , do not really care about the games..

    Reply
  243. Kate said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:02 am

    @Up the Coast:
    It is hard to believe at times. I have to turn it off because this case is incredibly sad, a young man was slaughtered, and watching her is just comical and dumbfounding. Out of respect for his life I just can’t watch it. I feel terrible sitting there laughing at absurb things coming out of her mouth, just unbelievable.

    Reply
  244. Kate said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:27 am

    Louo@Patty Anne:
    @Patty Anne:
    Kim Jong Un is upstaging all of them, including Halle. Doesn’t matter how famous you are, you can not control world events.. I bet that 75 % tax in France has changed the plans of more than one celebrity. ;)

    Reply
  245. Kate said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:33 am

    @Stella:
    Nice to see all of u ladies popping in. Hope you had a nice Easter , Passover, Spring Holiday.

    Reply
  246. Guest2 said on April 7th, 2013 at 8:03 am

    @Kate:
    That’s an interesting observation on that blind. I couldn’t understand why anyone would write such a thing even as a prank but your theory makes sense. If they would would allow such a thing to be written about them and their children it makes you wonder what the real dirt is that BG doesn’t write about.

    Reply
  247. guest 3 said on April 7th, 2013 at 10:06 am

    You just proved how shallow your minds are.. You’re talking about a sheer dress (BTW, YSL off the runway) and not the message.. A young girl shot in the head for wanting an education. Reading CB posters, whom admittedly said they tried to hate her but now see the light. Make up your minds ..if you see photos of the kids, they are pimping their children and projects.. If you don’t see photos, there is trouble in their relationship. Even with Ben , who I don’t care for.. He’s pimping his children to win a Oscar?? It’s sounds so ridiculous. The JP’s are notoriously known for disappearing for months at a time since the beginning of their relationship.. Do you remember? the haters predicted they broke up after the twins were born since they hadn’t seen Angie in 4 months. This family is busy doing important things in the world, not suntanning on the beaches of Mexico/Hawaii, sitting in the front row of fashion shows, attending industry parties (just to be seen/networking)..Brad’s nieces confirmed they had a family gathering around the Christmas holiday’s in Turks and Caicos., Doug confirmed how much the family loves Angie when promoting his ads in Austrailia (sp)?? and how JA/Brad is old news and wish people would move on. . What is “girly girl” defined as?? Drinking and sitting around gossiping about other girls? To me, a real “Girly Girl “is helping other women and girls.. By building schools, publicizing rapes.. I definitely would want a Jolie on my side than a woman who thinks my worth is based on my body, looks, could hold down a drink, and gossip about other women.

    Reply
  248. Up the Coast said on April 7th, 2013 at 12:45 pm

    @Stella:
    I love TurboTax :)
    @Guest2:
    IDK where MPearl lives…wasn’t her son seen playing with the boys a couple weeks ago, in a park?

    Reply
  249. Up the Coast said on April 7th, 2013 at 12:52 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate :) I didn’t think about it (the blind) that way….if it would have been anyone else, I would agree that the blind was distasteful, but these kids own parents put them ‘out there’ for Ca$h :( and no one has come forward to protect them from their own parents disgusting behavior, so maybe it’s not wrong (jk). I’m not sure if the JP’s were “in on it” but if they were to sue BG over it…that would give it more attention, imo.

    Reply
  250. Up the Coast said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    @Kate:
    She is a joke! :evil: Her and that idiot “domestic abuse witness” is setting abused women back decades. She looks more like a man-hater than an expert witness, imo. I don’t understand why it has gone on for sooooo long. Jodi has already (after 3 times) admitted she did it, and she’s proved to be a pathological liar, so we can’t believe anything she says or has ever said. Real victims of abuse do not drive away and then call, pretending to leave a mssg, to cover their tracks….real victims usually fall into a heap, then pick up the phone and confess that ‘they did it’. Real victims of abuse blame themselves, because that’s what they’ve been brainwashed to believe. I can’t believe they are wasting so much time and money on this charade. If she wasn’t a pretty white girl……well, just look at what happened to Brian Banks :(

    Reply
  251. Guest2 said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:38 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I haven’t really followed the trial much but it seems so obvious that there should be a first degree murder conviction. How can they claim self-defense logically when she shot him, then stabbed him multiple times and then slit his throat. It sounds like a crime of passion and rage not fear. And now that foolish juror being dismissed, I hope it doesn’t de-rail the trial. It’s disgusting what psychopaths can get away with.

    Reply
  252. Guest2 said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:39 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I do too! It’s the easiest tax program out there, much better than the H&R Block program.

    Reply
  253. Guest2 said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:44 pm

    @guest 3:
    You’ve got it wrong, jolie made it all about herself when she wore the inappropriate see-through dress for no other reason than to call attention to herself. That’s what narcissistic skanks do. But by all means, carry on with your adoration of the shameless slut.

    Reply
  254. jansa said on April 7th, 2013 at 1:58 pm

    hope everybody had a good Easter. just want to say that it is sad and disgraceful that a woman goes to a event dressed as a american hooker and gives the small and mean minded men of this world a reason to point finger and say yes these woman of the world want our females to get a education so that they can become shameless and show off their bodies in clothes like these western woman.
    i know that sounds ridiculous but this is the way events and things get twisted so that they have reason to hang onto their beliefs, that somebody did not address her and tell her how inappropriate her dress was before she attended makes me think that people dislike her and don,t care that she makes a fool out of herself and the seriousness of this event. it is time that her an Peewee steps out of the spotlight and retires to a quite country life and gives the world and the USA a break from their disgraceful and low class behavior. jmo

    Reply
  255. Patty Anne said on April 7th, 2013 at 2:43 pm

    +1@jansa:

    Reply
  256. Up the Coast said on April 7th, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    @jansa:
    +2

    Reply
  257. Up the Coast said on April 7th, 2013 at 3:23 pm

    @Guest2:
    It always amazes me, what they can get away with. Jodi thinks she’s smarter than everyone else in the room, and sometimes I wonder if she’s right :( And now, some of these talking heads are questioning her parents behavor. My guess would be that she burnt her parents out long ago, with her games/lies/BS, and that’s why they seem ‘detached’.

    Reply
  258. Up the Coast said on April 7th, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    @Guest2:
    Which reminds me ;) On Sat night, 20/20 was on w/a episode called “Losing it”, about how angry people are nowadays, road rage, etc. The last half hour was about a wealthy hand surgeon, who was a pillar of the community, but he beat/abused his wives :( He went to court and the judge/jury never found him guilty, because it was always his golddigging wives who were trying to take him to the cleaners. I had to laugh at the end, when he ended up in hot water becuz he mis-behaved on a plane! So the moral seems to be that…..you can be a complete A-hole to your wife and kids…but you better behave yourself on a plane :lol:

    Reply
  259. Guest2 said on April 7th, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    @jansa:
    +3, except that I think she looks like a disney hooker dressed in a see-through maleficent costume. American hookers dress better than that. I guess she’s no longer playing the June Cleaver role.

    Reply
  260. Guest2 said on April 7th, 2013 at 4:30 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    It must be difficult for the parents of a psychopathic child. How do you deal with that? You would have to detach since it would be impossible to have a close, loving relationship with someone incapable of that. There’s probably some guilt too wondering what you did wrong that your child turned out that way. I really believe that pychopaths are born but maybe events in their lives turn some of them to criminal behavior.

    Reply
  261. Tetta said on April 7th, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    @jansa:

    +4 It sounds strange, but I wonder if Angelina is seen as such a big star that no one dare to tell her when she does something wrong, for example wearing a wrong dress for an occasion. In my eyes she often wears “wrong” clothes but most of the time it doesn´t matter. But this time she crossed the line.

    Reply
  262. Up the Coast said on April 7th, 2013 at 6:33 pm

    ‘Disconnect’ opens April 12…..If anyone is looking for a good movie to go to, this one is very thought provoking: http://disconnectthemovie.com/#/trailer

    Reply
  263. Stella said on April 7th, 2013 at 7:51 pm

    @Kate:

    Thanks Kate. Good to see you and hope you had a wonderful Easter, Passover, Spring Holiday too!! Wishes and wonderful healthy thoughts for your child being sent your way. xoox

    Reply
  264. Liz E. said on April 8th, 2013 at 12:41 am

    @jansa:

    ” . . . a woman goes to a event dressed as a american hooker”

    A HOOKER? LOL! You can’t be serious. She looked like a nun.

    Reply
  265. WR said on April 8th, 2013 at 2:15 am

    @Liz E.:
    From which order did she resemble one of them?

    Reply
  266. Patty Anne said on April 8th, 2013 at 9:26 am

    From the order of “wearing sheer gowns that clearly show our black T-back panties”, that one.@WR:

    Reply
  267. Guest2 said on April 8th, 2013 at 10:43 am

    @Liz E.:
    I can’t believe you seriously wrote such a silly comment.

    Reply
  268. Dream said on April 8th, 2013 at 12:02 pm

    lol it occurred to me this morning jolie has morphed into edwina from absolutely fabulous.
    eating disorder.
    mind altering substances.
    designer clothes.
    all the right causes.
    horrendous hair.
    she could be patsy if she gets the hair under control and figures out how to wear clothes properly.

    seriously she was just at michaels, couldn’t she have grabbed a t shirt while she was there. from old photos i see jolie really looks good in yellow. cute yellow t with some white leggings or white skinny jeans would be darling for spring. whats the point of being so tiny if not to wear cute clothes? lol maybe a designer will come out with a leggings, t shirt line charge a thousand for them and she will finally wear them.

    Reply
  269. Up the Coast said on April 8th, 2013 at 12:36 pm

    @Liz E.:
    :lol: :lol: :lol: Good one! That was hilarious….

    Reply
  270. Up the Coast said on April 8th, 2013 at 1:05 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    She was dressed as a transvestite nun ;)

    Reply
  271. Louisianagurl said on April 8th, 2013 at 2:34 pm

    @Guest2:
    You didn’t mention me, but I think of myself as an old faithful and am really waiting on Ian…the Catholic church is moving more quickly than he is in getting us the next clue…and that is saying a lot! ( I am Catholic, so just throwing a joke out there…lighten up people!!)…Also, not sure if I am the only one, but I can’t see twitter when I am looking at the site, so the clues from there don’t help me unless someone commits to posting all of them here and specifying that they are doing so. I hope to return full on when Ian does! I know he is busy…but so am I and I take the time to come and check here often even if I am not responding!

    Reply
  272. Louisianagurl said on April 8th, 2013 at 2:38 pm

    @Kate:
    I lost my WP info…can you or someone get it back to me? Got a new computer at work and all of my bookmarks got wiped. UGG.

    Reply
  273. Tetta said on April 8th, 2013 at 3:31 pm

    @Louisianagurl:

    It seems like Ian has “checked out” from his blog ! I think it´s up to ourselves to keep it going. We have done that before and for longer times also. If we find something interesting on others sites or magazine, bring it here and we discuss it. :) I´m sorry I can’t help you with your WP issue. I hope someone else knows what to do.

    Reply
  274. Guest2 said on April 8th, 2013 at 4:03 pm

    @Louisianagurl:
    I definitely thought of you and the only reason I didn’t include you is that I know you always come back when there is a new clue to solve, like Rushdog, Iwasanon, Liv4, French Chick when she has some news from France (she hasn’t updated us in a long time) and many others who comments I love to read. But when I didn’t see UTC, PA, and Tetta for quite a while I was concerned that they had gone for good and maybe the site was getting ready to shut down since Ian hadn’t tweeted in a long time. I hope he will put our minds to rest on that with a new clue.

    Reply
  275. Guest2 said on April 8th, 2013 at 5:02 pm

    @Guest2:
    Kate mentioned that Ian is dealing with a personal issue so maybe he will post a clue when that is resolved.

    Reply
  276. Patty Anne said on April 8th, 2013 at 5:48 pm

    How sad. Annette Funicello has died of complications from her multiple sclerosis at 70 y/o. She was the original Disney princess before Britney and Christina.

    Reply
  277. Guest1 said on April 8th, 2013 at 5:53 pm

    Here is a link to an interesting article we can discuss:

    http://www.showbizspy.com/article/258599/angelina-jolie-and-madonna-make-up.html

    Reply
  278. Guest2 said on April 8th, 2013 at 9:36 pm

    @Guest1:
    The comments were funny…nice couple.

    Reply
  279. WR said on April 9th, 2013 at 2:50 am

    @Patty Anne:
    It sounds like you didn’t understand my question in my reply to Liz E.
    When one mentions the order a nun belongs to, one is asking which one of hundreds of orders the nun may belong to, or maybe a secular order. For example, there are nuns who belong to The Carmelite order of nuns.
    There are two former nuns in my complex. They are always dressed in an impeccable manner and are very dignified in appearance. One used to be in the movies as a baby/child in the tail end of the ’30s.
    What a contrast to one male tenant who was a musician, and who saw the seamy side of show biz. He’s the one who can tell raw edge stories. No one asks him; he volunteers the info., but we change the subject because we don’t want to hear it.

    Reply
  280. WR said on April 9th, 2013 at 3:04 am

    Well, off topic, but there is a photo of AJ in the new NE. If you browse thru it at a supermarket, you will see AJ”s feet. Depressing! One doesn’t feel schadenfreude over this. Hope she will fully recover.

    Reply
  281. WR said on April 9th, 2013 at 3:10 am

    Mark Twain is said to have remarked that the coldest winter he ever experienced, was a summer in San Francisco. It’s true of other cities along the California Pacific shores, as well. Brrrr!
    Rec’d a postcard from a friend in Michigan last week. He said it was very cold, there, and was looking forward to returning to California.
    Check the Pacific Rim for earthquake info. Everything seems normal lately.

    Reply
  282. too funny said on April 9th, 2013 at 6:11 am

    @WR:

    Well do they look like this.. Maybe JenJen will recover

    http://acidcow.com/famous/33180-celebrities-with-ugly-feet-15-pics.html

    Reply
  283. Patty Anne said on April 9th, 2013 at 11:48 am

    I was being facetious WR. I’ve been to a Vocation Director in my youth, but alas, was not suited to the vocation.@WR:

    Reply
  284. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on April 9th, 2013 at 1:32 pm

    Bwwwahhhhaaaa….Brad Pitt going to the MTV awards. He is desperately trying to appeal to the young crowd now, to promote his WWZ movie! Has he EVER been to the MTV awards before??

    Funny how last year the loons were crowing about how Jennifer being nominated and won an award, and how Brangelina would NEVER attend something like this, because they only attend the more prestigious awards…..and ONLY when they are nominated.

    Reply
  285. Tetta said on April 9th, 2013 at 1:59 pm

    @WR:

    A foreigner from a warmer country visited Scandinavia and was asked: What do you think about the winter ? He answered, What winter do you mean ? The white one ore the green one ? His answer is very legitimate this year. It still snows almost every day and that´s very unusual when we have passed the first week of April.

    Reply
  286. Up the Coast said on April 9th, 2013 at 3:44 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    It won’t be long before he’ll be showing up at the “opening” of strip malls :lol:

    Reply
  287. Guest1 said on April 9th, 2013 at 4:57 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    My brothers recently got me to watch ‘The Living Dead’. I’ve only watched the season finally on TV this year, a couple of weeks ago, and they had several promos for ‘Word War Z’. I’ve watched past episodes on Netflix and Amazon.

    Reply
  288. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on April 9th, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    @Guest1:

    Yea wait about another month, and they are going to be promoting this movie to hell and back. There is some serious coin that has already been spent on this movie. Pitt wanted to make a POLITICAL statement out of this movie, and Paramount seen it, trashed his idea, hired another screen writer or two, and made him remake half of the movie over again……I am sure with all the promotion, marketing, distributing, and production this movie is probably in the red to the tune of 250 million dollars at least. This one sinks at the box office like Killing Them Softly did, you can betcha the only thing Pitt will be doing is opening of strip malls!

    Reply
  289. Dream said on April 10th, 2013 at 12:43 am

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    i sort of wonder about pitt making the movie a political statement thing. the boo\k actually is a political statement written into a preposterous setting meant to represent any world wide catastrophe. the complaints in the beginning were that the movie was leaving that out and jsut making it a zombie movie. so i have to wonder if this is a story being floated to make pitt not the bad guy.
    btw the book is really a good read.

    Reply
  290. WR said on April 10th, 2013 at 2:36 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, I got that it was a facetious comment. But had to clarify it for the sake of other readers.
    We all remember Trevor Nielsen, who advised AJ to remake her image by charity works and adoptions. And it worked, as at least one site, Dlisted, started to refer to her as Saint Angie. And remember that when one repeats a lie often enough, people who were outraged at first, start to believe the lie. And so the image makeover worked in part because of the charity chic aspect.
    So I say this because I read that Madonna and AJ have got together for more charity chic endeavors. And who is advising Madonna? You guessed it, Trevor Nielsen.

    Reply
  291. WR said on April 10th, 2013 at 2:38 am

    @WR:
    So I asked myself why did Madonna need an image makeover. What a question!

    Reply
  292. WR said on April 10th, 2013 at 2:46 am

    @Tetta:
    It’s been a lifelong dream of mine to visit Scandinavia. My late brother-in-law was from Sweden. His surname was Ostlund.
    Currently, some of us here in Southern California, have to wear winter jackets when we venture outside esp. in the morining. The wet wind is powerful! Still, there are some pockets of warm spaces during the daylight hours.
    I don’t trust heaters so they’re shut off. Instead I bundle up. I live fairly close to a busy airport, so the tenants here complain of the ever-present dust.
    But, as they say, the grass is always greener. Nuff said!

    Reply
  293. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on April 10th, 2013 at 9:53 am

    Ha ha…

    Jolie is going to London to try to save the world….

    While Pitt is going to MTV awards, to try to save his career!

    Luv it!

    Reply
  294. Patty Anne said on April 10th, 2013 at 10:34 am

    Wow, so now Madonna is using Trevor Nielsen? Seems all things are shared eventually in HW. I’d venture to guess the disagreement between Angie and Madonna was faked as well ( for publicity). Is nothing real in HW?@WR:

    Reply
  295. Guest2 said on April 10th, 2013 at 2:19 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Sooooo funny. A little more smugness from octomom and we wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.

    Reply
  296. Patty Anne said on April 10th, 2013 at 3:29 pm

    +1@Guest2:

    Reply
  297. Liz E. said on April 10th, 2013 at 7:51 pm

    @WR:

    ” . . . Trevor Nielsen, who advised AJ to remake her image by charity works and adoptions.”

    Jolie was involved in charitable efforts way before she ever met this guy. She founded her first charitable foundation in 2001. By the time she met Neilson she had already adopted 2 children so the second part of that idea is just as false as the first part.

    Jolie probably parted company with Neilson for the same reason he parted ways with the highly respected Endeavor Group after a very short stint with them. It seems Neilson’s, shall we say, personality was too egotistical and he did things without authorization or seeking approval first. He probably got that trait from the late Richard Holbrooke LOL! – a great man but truly one who answered to no one.

    That said, people like Neilson provide a valuable service for those seeking to explore where their charitable giving should go, how they can combine efforts with other charities and making their donations effectively used and monitored.

    Reply
  298. Liz E. said on April 10th, 2013 at 7:56 pm

    @Dream:

    I agree with you, Dream. WWZ, the book, is definitely a political statement. It seems Pitt may have been forced to compromise or very likely realized himself that too much politics was not the best angle for a high priced zombie flick. As much as I enjoyed the nature of the book and the very droll political digs and satire I never thought that aspect of the story was going to be much of a money maker.

    I think there is a subtle way to make political points as reflected in the book without some people even realizing it.

    Reply
  299. rushdog said on April 10th, 2013 at 9:20 pm

    @WR:
    IMO AJ figured out how to remake her image with humanitarian work and adoptions all on her own. A master as redirection and why…because she’s been doing it all her life. Ian’s posted there’s a family business…

    Reply
  300. rushdog said on April 10th, 2013 at 9:37 pm

    Everyone enjoying the AJ PR show? Because that’s what is going on right now – priority one = Angie – an immersion of AJ humanitarian pr to get “rid of old paint” from that last few years which culminated in leg gate and grey goose under the table. All wrapped up in do-gooding, cuz if you do something good by all means let’s get some positive PR so your weaknesses and stumbles can be whitewashed. Got to stay at the top of the heap and not lose what you’ve gotten (especially when, despite being some big proponent of education, your own is sorely lacking). That’s what it all looks like to me. The year of the snake –

    getting rid of old paint – recreate a new picture
    who are illuminati – CFR, financiers & industrialist and media controllers
    monson secret garden – bring life back after damage
    forever new tattoo – to remain w/mass appeal
    the wounded healher – wounds can be transformed into strength – humanitarian work
    scarey alcohol shots – a frightening cocktail mix of
    treason & sedition – befriending enemies & incitement against the status quo

    Ian’s prediction 1/1/13 for what we’ll see this year. Well that seems to be right on track!

    Reply
  301. Guest1 said on April 10th, 2013 at 11:11 pm

    I find it interesting that Beyoncé and Jay Z are being questioned about whether or not their controversial visit to Cuba was sanctioned. On 3/27/13 AJ’s plane (N805MX) flew from Las Tunas, Cuba to Van Nuys, CA. I wonder if they lent their plane to Beyoncé and Jay Z, or if one of them were in Cuba, and if so, for what reason.

    Reply
  302. too funny said on April 10th, 2013 at 11:15 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    YOU mean like this.. LOL
    http://www.hotcelebshome.com/2009/11/27/jennifer-aniston-la-mamounia-hotel-re-opening-in-marrakech/@Deanne (formerly known as whatever):

    NO the JP fans said they didn’t need a PR team to buy them an award they didn’t deserve. See big difference. And Brad has been at the MTV awards. Nothing wrong with promoting a film. Even for Old Jenny. But to get fake phony awards for well doing noting. Yes that is a joke that everyone gets.

    Reply
  303. Mistory said on April 11th, 2013 at 2:32 am

    Celebrities With The Biggest Declines In Appeal From 2012-2013 (INFOGRAPHIC)

    Brad on the list hehehehehe

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/celebrities-biggest-declines-appeal_n_3039078.html?utm_hp_ref=celebrity

    Reply
  304. WR said on April 11th, 2013 at 3:10 am

    @Liz E.:
    @rushdog:
    Thanks for the reply. I was going by the frequent discussion on this site from a couple of years ago. As I recall, there was a lot of mentions of Trevor Nielsen. And the gist of it was that he was a key advisor to AJ. And her charity work being publicized was a key factor in her image makeover. I thought there were discussions then about adoptions and child searches in foreign countries.
    Someone probably has a better memory of when these discussions took place. Anyone?
    About the adoptions being her own decision, I can only say I did wonder why the searching in foreign countries, when there is so much to do in our own. I remember there were mentions that AJ’s public antics, and something in Brad’s past would make it difficult to adopt children from the U.S.A.
    Also, the false claim that she is part native american. She couldn’t obtain a n/a child, as they have restrictions about adoption. But there are other minorities that could be rescued from an extremely poor environment, one would think.

    Reply
  305. WR said on April 11th, 2013 at 3:16 am

    Ian, re: the headline, and the reference to ajp. I get it if you are trying to point out that charity works should be done, yes, but it does look fake when one is super-rich, and photographers just happen to be there to record the works. Then, after the publicity is done, comes the return to the rich lifestyle.

    Reply
  306. WR said on April 11th, 2013 at 3:33 am

    @Mistory:
    Well, if he keeps his word about giving up acting next year, it will all be fine as far as some of us are concerned.
    Other than that, most of those names are unfamiliar. Ryan Lochte, #!, will be remembered, particularly if he decides to try out for another Olympics. He’s had some negative publicity regarding his lack of personality and talent.

    Reply
  307. Gues2 said on April 11th, 2013 at 8:22 am

    @rushdog:
    You’re right, that’s what we’re seeing though she does seem to be trying to get her sexy back with that see-thru sack she wore. She can’t seem to fully hide her true self.

    Reply
  308. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on April 11th, 2013 at 11:20 am

    @Mistory:

    Ah, look at her at playing “grown up”. The pearls are a nice touch….
    Yes, it’s a costume, for a role she’s playing…….and a web she’s spinning….

    I guess her showing up in a long sheer beige nightgown and black sheer robe, wouldn’t suffice at this type of event.

    BTW, how come Brad no longer accompany’s her on these humanitarian jaunts? There was a time when these two did EVERYFREAKINGTHING together.

    Will she stay in London, or will she back in time to play arm candy to Pitt @ the MTV awards? Or is that now beneath her royal standards?

    Reply
  309. Guest2 said on April 11th, 2013 at 11:30 am

    So if William Hague becomes jolie’s new boyfriend, this blogger will call them wingelina, kinda funny.

    http://www.bohomoth.com/?p=32578

    Reply
  310. Guest2 said on April 11th, 2013 at 11:31 am

    Are there any photos of her where she isn’t covering up her ring finger?

    Reply
  311. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on April 11th, 2013 at 11:40 am

    @Guest2:

    Yes..however she is waving so you can’t tell if she’s sporting the wedding band or the promise for the future ring….

    Reply
  312. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on April 11th, 2013 at 3:32 pm

    Anyone know what happened to Ian? He isn’t here nor has he tweeted anything…..

    This post is almost a month old..it’s time for a new update.

    Reply
  313. Patty Anne said on April 11th, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    I think Hagelina would be better…lol@Guest2:

    Reply
  314. Patty Anne said on April 11th, 2013 at 4:51 pm

    I think he’s occupied with personal stuff at the moment, and we all know how time consuming that can be. Hopefully he will make a new post soon. @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):

    Reply
  315. Guest2 said on April 11th, 2013 at 5:16 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    That describes her, lol.

    Reply
  316. fluffy said on April 12th, 2013 at 4:23 am

    Patty Anne

    Well said! HA! HA!

    Come on Ian ! New post please we are getting bored!

    Reply
  317. rushdog said on April 12th, 2013 at 10:33 am

    Ian may be occupied with other things, but imo he hasn’t posted anything else because this post is relevant to the pr that is going on right now. This was posted 3/14 and the Congo trip was to follow about 10-12 days later. Not hard to come across this information with an inside soure. He could have selected any of a number of Funny Pope card to represent hypocrisy/greed but he chose the card that pictured Africans which I think was meant to point to the upcoming posturing. Think this is a little “you scratch my back, I”ll scratch yours” going on. The foreign minister of a country has to bring an actress along on the trip to draw attention to an issue? Really? Does Secy Kerry or Secy Clinton, did they or do they need to do this on their foreign trips?

    Ang, and Jesus said, if you truly believe in following the laws and helping others, give up all you have for the poor…give up your life of hypocrisy…stop hiding behind the humanitarian work and accepting the praise ‘05 to present as a way to hide your secrets. He posted this because of the current use of her pr to correct the slide of her image and to cover the secrets.

    And I now believe that WR is correct and the scroll: “jesusajp” is a reference to her and the continued facade of the humanitarian work and that she is or will be ajp.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

March 2013
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta