Your thoughts on the Oscars????

Posted on February 25th, 2013 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive
  1. anonymous said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:10 pm

    First. Sorry couldn’t resist.

    Reply
  2. Liz E. said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:11 pm

    oops that was me, Liz E. I hate having to retype info in after changing batteries.

    Reply
  3. Liz E. said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    I guess I’m alone.

    Everyone looked nice. Everyone seemed happy. I adore Ang Lee so I was happily surprised.

    Reply
  4. Up the Coast said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:29 pm

    @anonymous:
    :lol:

    Reply
  5. Up the Coast said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:31 pm

    Everyone has already expressed their thoughts on the last thread.

    Reply
  6. iwasanon said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:33 pm

    Someone is carry a baby in the pic above but who is it?

    Reply
  7. Guest1 said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:36 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Yes it was nice to have one of the winners be a surprise. Unfortunately I have not seen any of the movies so I can put in my two cents.

    I don’t have much to say about the puzzle, only that if you click on ‘JPs’ you get this thread and also a thread from 2009, and if you click on ‘Oscars’ you get two old threads, one from 1/25/12 and one from 2/20/09. That’s all I’ve got.

    Reply
  8. fluffy said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:43 pm

    Is someone having a baby as it tagged JP? Is the brunette AJ? What has this got to do with the Oscars?
    Rushdog where are you!

    Reply
  9. Up the Coast said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:43 pm

    Is this Ange’s excuse for not being there or watching it on tv? She’s such a “hands on” mother after all ;) (what do those nannies do???)

    Reply
  10. iwasanon said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:44 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Dark haired woman so I’m guessing Jolie. But isn’t she going to be busy directing Unbroken now that she has the Coen Bros lined up to rewrite it. So how would she have time to have or adopt another baby.

    Reply
  11. liv4 said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:44 pm

    AJ has new baby and didn’t attend.

    Reply
  12. Up the Coast said on February 25th, 2013 at 11:45 pm

    The joke is on her hoohaw…

    Reply
  13. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 12:31 am

    Surprised to see a new post. I’ll add my two cents.

    I think the tags are key here. As Guest1 wrote the tags both go back to previous posts abd not that many. The oscar tag connects back to posts in 2009 when the triangle was at the awards and Jen was with Mayer; and 2012 when Bp and AJ had “the red carpet blues.”

    Reply
  14. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 12:49 am

    Had to check something…

    When you click on the JPs tag it goes to the similarly tagged Jen and Justin post of June 2011 “as real as Y2k” riddle. The tag in that riddle have the Jps in the middle of jen and justin. Not sure if all that is relevant but it’s interesting how Ian chose to tag this.

    So the triangle attends in ‘09, bp/aj in ‘12 and ja/jt in ‘13.

    Reply
  15. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 12:57 am

    @liv4:
    If the photo represents aj this year when she didn’t attend could it also represent ja last year when she didn’t attend (like with prissy and pink!!!!). He he…got to have some fun with this!

    Reply
  16. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 1:00 am

    Hahas for hoohas.com- “because funny women need funny cards”

    Reply
  17. fluffy said on February 26th, 2013 at 1:02 am

    Rushdog!

    Do you think that by the Yk2 tag that Ian is implying that Justin is still Jen’s Beard. Seems strange that both couples announce an engagements around the same time

    Reply
  18. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 8:27 am

    Why does he have a picture of a woman holding a baby up there?

    Reply
  19. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 8:30 am

    @Guest2:
    Nevermind, now that I read all the posts again I seen it’s been discussed. Too early, need more coffeee.

    Reply
  20. Payal said on February 26th, 2013 at 10:20 am

    Ooh I think Jolie is preggers! I feel sorry the kid and their other kids already

    Reply
  21. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 10:33 am

    @Payal:
    Why are you posting as payal? WTF is wrong with you?

    Reply
  22. Payal said on February 26th, 2013 at 10:50 am

    What?! I am Payal lol

    Reply
  23. joanne said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:23 am

    My two cents. The woman holding the baby is wearing a thick scarf so I would say Aniston is having the baby.
    Real or not Aniston looks healthy, happy and getting better with age so it doesn’t matter. Its probably not possible to have a ‘real life’ in Hollyweird anyway.

    Reply
  24. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:26 am

    OooooooKay~! So jps ( Jolie-Pitts) didn’t attend the Oscars because Angie has a new baby? I wonder if Billy Bob Thornton/ Johnny Lee Miller are aware? snark.

    Reply
  25. joanne said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:27 am

    If the Jolie Pitts adopted again then all I can say is shame on whoever let her. Can’t stop a ho from having her own but she looks like she doesn’t even menstruates being so skinny.

    Reply
  26. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:37 am

    I keep thinking back to what Ian posted about Jennifer awhile back ( too lazy to research the date)..”Just because I haven’t told you I have a baby doesn’t mean that I don’t” about Jennifer. Well, if that were true the kid would be ready for pre-school by now and since we’ve never seen it nor heard anything official I’m in doubts it’s true. It is possible that Jennifer is pregnant now, but as she is on record as saying, “don’t take that thrill away from me, when I’m having a child I will tell you myself”…or words to that effect. I for one will concede her right to do so when she’s ready.

    There have been stories that Angie is pregnant, but since they’ve gone on longer than a nine month pregnancy I’m guessing it’s another attempt to remain relevent as with the promise ring engagement, etc. The referrence to Red Carpet Blues which featured a photo of Angie and Johnny Depp would make me think if there is a pregnancy, it would be Angie and Johnny. I can picture a very happy and contented Jennifer Aniston getting a Hoohaw laugh out of this turn of events….poor Brad, the fool. Just my opinion. Waiting now to see if my shadow will jump in and comment. lol

    Reply
  27. joanne said on February 26th, 2013 at 12:04 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Can you imagine what Depp and Jolie would create? Yikes!

    Reply
  28. Tetta said on February 26th, 2013 at 12:43 pm

    Since I have nothing to add to this clue I will keep quiet. But there is a reference to Frida Payne´s song “Band of Gold” beside the card. I didn´t see it earlier today. Perhaps it´s added later.

    Reply
  29. joanne said on February 26th, 2013 at 12:53 pm

    Is Pitt pining for Aniston ? Since Aniston looks fantastic and Pitt looks homeless I don’t think she is pining for him. Unless of course her acting is better than they give her credit for.

    Reply
  30. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 1:50 pm

    @Guest2:
    ;) git ‘em :lol:

    Reply
  31. liv4 said on February 26th, 2013 at 1:52 pm

    Isn’t the tag JPs usually Jolie-Pitt?

    Now that you’re gone, all that’s left is a band of gold
    All that’s left of the dreams I hold
    Is a band of gold and the memories of what love could be
    If you were still here with me

    You took me from the shelter of a mother
    I had never known to love any other
    We kissed after taking vows, but that night on our honeymoon
    We stayed in separate rooms

    I wait in the darkness of my lonely room
    Filled with sadness, filled with gloom
    Hoping soon that you’ll walk back through that door
    And love me like you tried before

    Since you’ve been gone, all that’s left is a band of gold
    All that’s left of the dreams I hold
    Is a band of gold and the dream of what love could be
    If you were still here with me

    Don’t you know that I wait in the darkness of my lonely room
    Filled with sadness, filled with gloom?
    Hoping soon that you’ll walk back through that door
    And love me like you tried before

    Since you’ve been gone all that’s left is a band of gold
    All that’s left of the dreams I hold
    Is a band of gold and the dream of what love could be
    If you were still here with me

    Since you’ve been gone all that’s left is a band of gold
    All that’s left of the dreams I hold
    Is a band of gold and the dream of what love could be
    If you were still here with me

    Since you’ve been gone all that’s left is a band of gold
    All that’s left of the dreams I hold
    Is a band of gold and the dream of what love could be
    If you were still here with me
    Lyrics from eLyrics.net

    I got nothing.

    Reply
  32. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 1:55 pm

    @joanne:
    Poor Pitt….he almost had it all.

    Reply
  33. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 2:08 pm

    @joanne:
    +++1

    Reply
  34. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 2:10 pm

    EEEK! too scary to ponder.
    1/16/12 Tension Before Golden Globes – Brangie
    1/31/12 Is This The Last Show – Brangie
    4/05/12 A-List Actor Tried To Choke His Partner – Brangie ?
    2/25/12 Red Carpet Blues accompanied by photos of Angie and Johnny Depp
    4/16/12 Brangie’s Desperate Attempt To Avoid Going Bust “Engagement” – Brangie
    7/11/12 Betting On Brangelina …How Long Will It Last?
    This one is about Brangie as well imo. We know they are finished, so is Angie adopting as a single woman and lamenting “all she has left since he’s been gone is a band of gold” ? promise ring? or secretly married for awhile…..@joanne:

    Reply
  35. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 2:22 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    WE know they are finished….but Ange won’t let go of her meal ticket.

    Reply
  36. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 2:24 pm

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=372908&sid=905e0bcd27b77042c3136714b861b308

    Seems everyone is saying Brad just isnt’ himself, and is suffering a break down from his connection with the ho. It’s Karma Brad, get used to it.

    Reply
  37. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 2:43 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    You figured it out before I did.

    Reply
  38. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 2:47 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    There’s a thread at FF where a poster (Vaj) has an interesting theory about who is planting these poor brad/awful angie stories. It actually makes some sense and I never thought of it before.

    Reply
  39. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 2:50 pm

    @joanne:
    I don’t think they’re pining for each other, it’s just been too long. I do think brad is pining for the simple days when his reputation was intact and he didn’t have to deal with crazy 24/7.

    Reply
  40. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 3:48 pm

    The photo of dark haired woman holding a baby – Angie with six children

    The phrase accompaning the above photo – Indicates to me she is too busy with children for a social life/Oscars/going to the movies.

    Ian has used JPs before to indicate Jolie-Pitts so this is about them/her

    In red, Band Of Gold indicates the song “all I have left is a band of gold since you left me” Confirmation Brad has left the partnership with Angie.

    Since the Oscars was held this past Sunday, this is Ian’s way of tying in the JP’s and their absence from the Oscars.

    JMO

    Reply
  41. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 3:49 pm

    Thanks, I’ll go look it up. Should be interesting.@Guest2:

    Reply
  42. Payal said on February 26th, 2013 at 3:50 pm

    Remember those massive gold bands brad and angelina used to wear all the time, that’s what reminded me of.

    Also it would be so weird if they were to ever officially break up, they’ve become symbiotic now. Where do they go once its over, they can’t possibly recover or go back to what they once were, who will have them and quite frankly they deserve to stay together and destroy each other and everything because that’s all the have done and all they have the ability to do. These games are all they have left no what keeps them going if I’m honest. They shouldn’t be able to leave each other and taint somebody else’s life.

    Reply
  43. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 4:07 pm

    @Guest2:
    I hope Brad finally sees that joLIE was never “misunderstood”…everyone that has ever come in contact with her, understands exactly who/what she is :shock: Bitch is an open book….she even says it herself, but then again, she lies.

    Reply
  44. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 4:31 pm

    Remember that poster at FF who said that aj was pregnant but not by drab? Maybe that’s what the baby in the photo means.

    Reply
  45. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on February 26th, 2013 at 4:32 pm

    So basically Pitt left Jolie, only with a band of Gold….
    That is why neither of them were at the Oscars on Sunday night. They’re no longer a couple, and weren’t ready to be asked why the other one wasn’t there. Or questions regarding their supposed “wedding”.
    They haven’t done any red carpets together at all for a year. In fact, the last red carpet together was last years Oscars.
    The only time you have seen them “pictured” as a couple perse, is taking the kids out somewhere..toy store, museum….which could just be their way of transitioning the kids, with their break up.

    Also, there was a huge truck pictured at their house. Of course the sign on the truck was from a gym equipment store..but who knows, if they wanted to disguise the fact that someone was moving out, since paps are stationed outside of their home constantly…and they didn’t want to alert the media that someone was moving out. I don’t think Brad would give up that Loz Feliz compound…but who knows, maybe they had it in their contract, that he supply her with a house for her and the kids, if a break up occurred…and that is really the ONLY “home” home these kids know…..even though they stay there only a couple of months out of the year. I guess the return for him having his “freedom” would be a small price to pay…giving up that compound, until of course the kids turn a certain age.

    Reply
  46. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 4:33 pm

    @Guest2:
    Though how could miz anorexia even conceive. Ha, I know, rosemary’s baby.

    Reply
  47. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 4:45 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    That’s what it looks like to me. The gym equipment truck was a nice touch, but I doubt anyone is really buying it.

    Reply
  48. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    @Guest2:
    :shock:

    Reply
  49. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    Where did the picture of the truck come from? I only saw it on FF and wondered why no other blogger commented on it.

    Reply
  50. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on February 26th, 2013 at 5:10 pm

    All I know is when we moved into our present home, we used my brother in laws work truck. If anyone, who didn’t know we were moving, seen that truck at our old house, they would assume we were having medical supplies delivered instead of moving! At that time, my brother in law owned his own medical supply company…

    Reply
  51. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:05 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Lol, the article has them together for nine years, so February of 2004 which is probably the truth.

    Band of Gold – what a great listen that was!! – all that’s left pretty much explains what Ian is trying to say. I’d like to think this picture just represents the children and not a new baby (really think she should take care, love and appreciate who is already in her life). There’s gossip out there that she’s pregnant again and it’s not his. At FF some posters thought “besties” (who shared that information) was/is Ian (I have no opinion on that) but that poster hasn’t reappeared in a few weeks.

    Reply
  52. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:09 pm

    @fluffy:
    I’m just posting what I see when I look at these things. Hopefully something will click with someone’s ideas. That certainly would fit with what I believe he was posting in mid-2011. Ian has also been consistent with the idea of fraud and microphonies. And I think these people are more connected that we might like to think. I don’t think that means that anyone is getting back together, might have been a consideration at one point in time out of “necessity” but that would have been back at the beginning of the puzzle.

    Reply
  53. Liz E. said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:12 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):

    Sorry to change the subject but your post about the medical truck reminded me about your son. I hope he has recovered and the authorities are handling the person responsible properly.

    Reply
  54. siska said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:22 pm

    Hi everyone!, I think the clue band of gold? Seem that one or maybe both of the couple will get married, and adopted a baby? I read jen will get marry on march,so if the triangle thing was still on,brangie will soon follow or upstage it? He.he
    Btw the oscar was good,funny with a touch of classic.
    Love jen nice banter with channing tatum.

    Reply
  55. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I’m still holding out that there was a delivery in late summer ‘11 because that’s what the riddles of then say to me and I think that’s why she flipped the real estate. (And it’s really fun to think what a secret piece of gossip that would be!!!!) Prissy and Pink! JTx was the sailor boy, the camouflage…the delivery-to-be was via a surrogate already in process at the time of the riddle post you mentioned. I wonder if that wasn’t the pink airplane “jenone” and her judas kiss to bp (haven’t read those riddles in a while). That would make the delivery about 18 months right now. Still easy to keep hidden at least for a while, although I do wonder where that would be…Cabo? Lol. And how could/would it ever be revealed? Don’t have any of those answers, I just believe that’s what the riddles say.

    Reply
  56. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:25 pm

    Yes, the 9 years together was a dead give-away to what we’d heard years ago. She thought snagging an A-Lister would give her status in HW, but alas, without talent the status doesn’t stick; Brad thought he was getting a great actress who would bring his films success (AMH for example) but discovered you can’t make a silk purse from a sow’s ear…too late. By the time he’d figured it out, there were already six kids around his neck. They both got what they deserved imo, but the kids did not. I feel so badly for them being dragged around the world and raised by a plethora of nannies. The only happy photos I’ve seen of them was when Angie was shooting The Tourist and Brad called his parents to come over. Those kids were happy and normal eating ice cream cones and touring Venice with G’ma and G’pa Pitt. @rushdog:

    Reply
  57. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:26 pm

    @siska:
    Gotta love you siska, you are so romantic and positive!!

    Reply
  58. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:27 pm

    That is the direction Ian pointed out with those riddles and the comment about Jen being a mother….but I can’t help but wonder the why and how she would go along with hiding her first born child. She’s already stated she wants the thrill of making the announcement when it happens….but there are more questions than answers surrounding that.@rushdog:

    Reply
  59. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on February 26th, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Yes….he has after a long rehabilitation, thank you for asking. The man was convicted in October, he will be spending the next 5 yrs of his life, behind bars., and not out driving and be able to kill someone.

    Reply
  60. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 9:14 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    Glad to hear this good news.

    Reply
  61. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 9:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Because I think when that statement was made the delivery was already in process. And I believe there’s a riddle suggesting someone found out and was pissed. I just think the situation didn’t play out as planned and there couldn’t be any shouting from the mountaintop.

    Reply
  62. rushdog said on February 26th, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    So glad to hear you son is better. Great news all around.

    Reply
  63. liv4 said on February 26th, 2013 at 9:33 pm

    @rushdog: Are we still thinking eggs from a previous marriage?

    Reply
  64. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 9:39 pm

    Apparently, the rumors about the coen brothers working with jolie are true.

    http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/02/25/angelina-jolie-teams-up-with-the-coen-brothers/?ref=topposts

    Reply
  65. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 9:53 pm

    @Guest2:
    Sounds like it’s right up her alley :roll:

    Reply
  66. guest 3 said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:00 pm

    I still can’t understand why you people are so concern about the JP’s Angie still landed another Directing gig, their children will be teens soon (i’m sure most of you remember when they were babies) , they bought Miravel, now producing wine under the JP name., still producing films..
    Is it that JA didn’t fulfill her promises.. Marriage and a baby in 5 years… Vanity Fair circa 2005..What? it’s now 2013. No baby, No husband. I guess I have to keep reminding you that the JP kids keep getting older, and JA still hasn’t delivered the baby and husband. She’s a miserable, boring cow.. You know it and I know it. JtX is only with her for HW connections, He’s no different than Ben Affleck.. Broke up with JLO only because it was hurting his reputation in HW. Team Heid!!! 14 years with a loser who sold out to HW.

    Reply
  67. Guest2 said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:07 pm

    @guest 3:
    You’re a miserable boring cow.

    Reply
  68. Up the Coast said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:11 pm

    @Guest2:
    +1

    Reply
  69. Patty Anne said on February 26th, 2013 at 11:28 pm

    And pigs fly……oh wait!! Maybe you do!!@guest 3:

    Reply
  70. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on February 27th, 2013 at 12:17 am

    @guest 3:

    Why are you so concerned with Jennifer Aniston, her life, her fiance, her movies? That “boring cow” you call her is worth upwards of 150 million dollars, and she didn’t have to have a MAN hand it to her either…..she earned it all by herself. Were Jolie is still having to use Brads connections in Hollywood, such as the Coen Bros, to get writers for that movie. We’ll see exactly how many esteemed actors or actresses in Hollywood are going to rush to sign up to be directed by her. My guess? She’ll get maybe a b-list or c-list actor (if she is that lucky)..for the title role..and then a bunch of unknowns, who want to get their big break… to fill up the other roles….but GOD himself could write this movie, and it is still going to bomb…at the box office, just like the land of made no money. She is no Katherine Bigelow…that is for darn sure!

    Reply
  71. guest 3 said on February 27th, 2013 at 12:44 am

    I wish I were a boring cow worth $150 million!

    Reply
  72. Jennifer Aniston said on February 27th, 2013 at 12:53 am

    Yes, I am worth $150 mil.
    Yes, I am gorgeous at 44.
    Yes, I married Brad Pitt, dated Vince, Gerard, John, Bradley, and now engaged to the handsome and talented Justin Theroux.
    No, I don’t want any children. Having children means you worry about them for the rest of your life!
    Why would I change anything about my marvelous life?

    Reply
  73. jansa said on February 27th, 2013 at 3:48 am

    well guest 3 you must be in heaven and ready to buy your air ticket to France to attend the most pretentious and common wedding of the century, with flying ponies and elephants cut out to represent each of the family members just remember the one called dumbo represents peewee and the one with the thin legs and big lips is jolietit. what a stupid and crass idea for a woman on her third marriage and a man on his second and kids born out of wedlock to even have a big wedding like this is sad and just think of how many starving kids this wedding cost could feed, that is why i call them the frauds of humanitarianism a=holes and down right no class. they should get married quietly with no fuss like miss Jackson at least she showed class.
    and before you refer to Jennifer, Justin has not been married so if they get married he is entitled to a wedding at least once, oh and by the way to all that think he is a beard for Jen really after watching the affection and love between these two how can you even think that. jmo

    Reply
  74. Liz E. said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:09 am

    Deanne, wonderful news about your son. I’m sure you and your family are so very relieved. That’s a really high sentence for DUI even if there’s a manslaughter charge.

    I don’t know why anyone believes these silly stories about pirouetting elephants and prancing ponies. If anyone is working on a wedding for them I think it’s a safe bet that none of them are talking to tabloid media or to anyone. While I’d think they’d want some fun entertainment for the kids attending, I suspect it will be a more simple family event when nice weather appears and they can comfortably have it outdoors. That’s my uneducated guess. Angelina may actually wear a wedding type dress since she’ s never had anything but elopements and I imagine her daughters might be more interested in having a “real” wedding with all the trimmings than either Angelina or Brad are. Just more uneducated guesses.

    Angelina has known the Coen brothers since at least 2000 when Billy Bob filmed The Man Who Wasn’t There. I don’t think she needs Brad to introduce her to people or make things happen for her.

    Reply
  75. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 8:23 am

    @Liz E.:
    Where did you get the idea that anyone here believes all the silly stories that come out about these two, especially regarding the wedding that they’ve talked about for years but never happens? Other than their loony fans most people laugh about it because it’s clear that all these “stories” are timed to coincide with events of the moment in order to keep their names in the “news”. Jolie is well known for her ability to manipulate the media and you probably know the NYT wrote an article about it. I couldn’t care less if they marry or split or fly to the moon but the questions in my mind that keeps me interested are, why they do look so sick and miserable if they are so happy? And how does someone like jolie get to meet with leaders in a part of the world where women like her would be stoned for some of her behavior. I wonder the same thing about KimK. Hardly role models for the Islamic world. Do they pay for these visits or are there powerful people giving them access for reasons we don’t know. Just wondering because it doesn’t make sense to me.

    Reply
  76. jansa said on February 27th, 2013 at 9:49 am

    well g3 you believe every story written about Jen so why not about the wedding.
    but then anything written about the brand is a joke and i love to remind u jolie fans how pretentious delusional they are. they are the joke and i need a laugh every now and then. remember i live in a poor and uncivilized place and am very gullible. jmo

    Reply
  77. Mistory said on February 27th, 2013 at 10:16 am

    Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux’s Wedding Planning Underway
    02/27/2013 at 07:50 AM EST
    http://www.peoplestylewatch.com/people/stylewatch/package/article/0,,20658247_20677544,00.html

    WOW

    Reply
  78. Tetta said on February 27th, 2013 at 10:22 am

    @Liz E.:
    @Liz E.:

    Guest2´s word are so true. We don´t believe what is written and no one could care less if Brangelina disappeared out in the space. They are so boring and dirty looking that it´s not any pleasure to see photos of them.
    Many times I have wondered why they don´t stop the so called “loons” writing awkward comments about Jennifer Aniston. If they want to be seen in a positive way Guest3´s and all the others´s words only make them look more disgusting than they perhaps are.

    Just one more thing that Guest2 didn´t mentioned. We have got a weird image of how AJ and BP treat their kids. They fly to the other side of the world just to get back “home” two days later. How about school ? Why do the kids always look miserable ? As we havn´t seen the kids for a long time I hope they have some stability in their lives right now. It´s not our business but as a normal function human being you can´t help feeling sorry for them.When it comes to kids I think it´s an instinct that we want to see them healthy and happy.

    Reply
  79. Payal said on February 27th, 2013 at 10:46 am

    @Mistory:

    What’s up? Ian can u come and speak to us please?!

    Reply
  80. Mistory said on February 27th, 2013 at 10:58 am

    @Payal:
    Hehehe

    Reply
  81. Mistory said on February 27th, 2013 at 10:59 am

    @Mistory:
    What do you mean ???

    Reply
  82. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 11:08 am

    @Mistory:
    If People really has a scoop on their wedding then I’m guessing j/j put it out there as a pre-emptive strike against any phony stories about a brand wedding coming out to upstage hers. I can see aj getting wind of the wedding and then leaking rumors about her own wedding just to try to make it look like jen is trying to steal her thunder. I could be wrong but I think that’s what happened with the engagement announcement/promise for the future. Of course, People could be wrong. We’ll have to wait and see but I hope tey get married and put the final nail in the triangle coffin. If that’s possible.

    Reply
  83. Patty Anne said on February 27th, 2013 at 11:19 am

    So true. What sort of person would see potential abusive behaviour directed at a helpless child and not worry for their safety. When you see sad faces daily, and read articles in newspapers stating children are out of control then you notice certain facts of their upbringing shown by the parentes pap photos intended to ensure popularity and relevance in the biz with the kids all over the planet in short periods of time you must wonder as their stability in reguards to a home life. No one would have any questions concerning the upbringing of the Jolie-Pill children if the Angelina Jolie and her partner Brad Pitt hadn’t forced this knowledge upon them with constant toy shop, whole foods market, etc. photo ops. They opened our eyes unintentionally I’m sure, to questions that will grow as the kids grow. So we watch and ask questions as any responsibile adult would@Tetta:

    Reply
  84. Payal said on February 27th, 2013 at 11:29 am

    @Mistory:
    what do u mean?! WOW lol

    Reply
  85. Patty Anne said on February 27th, 2013 at 11:54 am

    BOHOMOTH has an interesting story on Justin and Jennifer’s shortly upcoming wedding. Some comments are very telling as well.

    Reply
  86. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 12:02 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, they are aren’t they? Lots of “new” posters there.

    Reply
  87. Guest1 said on February 27th, 2013 at 12:14 pm

    @Payal:
    Since you were the first to post a comment over at Bohomoth I think you know exactly what Mistory is writing about.

    Reply
  88. Payal said on February 27th, 2013 at 12:28 pm

    I know what i wrote than u very much, was just asking mistory what she meant by wow that’s all.

    Reply
  89. Mistory said on February 27th, 2013 at 12:43 pm

    @Payal:

    I’m just happy about the news . Jen rocks

    Reply
  90. Payal said on February 27th, 2013 at 1:21 pm

    @Mistory:
    Ok I see, just don’t hate me because I’m not feeling it please.

    Reply
  91. Patty Anne said on February 27th, 2013 at 1:27 pm

    http://youtu.be/KreJ4LjslgM

    Miranda Kerr says Jen and Justin are “so in love”

    Reply
  92. Mistory said on February 27th, 2013 at 1:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Thanks ^_^

    Reply
  93. Patty Anne said on February 27th, 2013 at 1:53 pm

    :-) @Mistory:

    Reply
  94. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 2:01 pm

    It cracks me up when anyone comes on here and tries to defend joLIE and her ridiculous behavior. Seriously? She wore a t-shirt and wrote on it with her own blood :( Who the fuck does that??? Anyone who thinks the JP kids look happy, have not been around children…period! Anyone who thinks it’s okay to pour caffeinated soda pop down a childs throat to wake them up…is a DUMBASS! In my opinion, of course :)

    Reply
  95. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 2:53 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    You know who does that, a mentally ill person who is desperately looking for attention. Just like the mentally ill people who go from blog to blog posting under different names and pretending to be other people. In fact, I think the latter might even be more crazy because who on earth would spend hours on end doing that other than a certifiable loonie. I guess crazy attracts crazy.

    Reply
  96. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 3:12 pm

    @Guest2:
    Crazy tries so hard to tell us how normal joLIE is….but Jen, who IS normal, is boring. Huh? :lol: I hate to tell them, but joLIE is the boring one. She has NO sense of humor, and that makes her BORING! :yawn:

    Reply
  97. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Well, I guess to a crazy person real normal would be boring. To them crazy seems normal because it’s all they know in their lives. How truly sad that they’ll never experience the joys of life that normalcy provides, only the torment that is their insanity. That’s why they go crazy on jen, especially when they see her so happy compared to their miserable, sickly looking idol. It’s resentment that they’ll never have what she’s got. I feel sorry for jen being the target of these loons because they truly are deranged and you never know when one of them will go totally berserk. I hope she has good security.

    Reply
  98. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on February 27th, 2013 at 3:43 pm

    If you think the wedding plans have them on meltdown mode…wait until they find out WHY Jennifer and Justin are getting married in a few short weeks………..LOL! You see the picture of the woman holding the baby on IANS post? It certainly doesn’t have anything to do with Angelina Jolie, that is for sure. ..The “gold band” added to this post…… put two and two together………………..Ian knows…..

    Reply
  99. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:07 pm

    @Guest2:
    These women make me think of…..Jody Arias :shock:

    Reply
  100. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    Does he? IDK.

    Reply
  101. Stella said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:12 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    UTC;

    Makes me think of this;

    http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/tdy-130124-shetland-ponies-cardigans2.photoblog500.jpg

    Wow, I laughed so hard!! So cute love’em!!!

    Reply
  102. Payal said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    That makes that blind item certainly true, if it is true then Jen needs to positively hide away for a while because the media frenzy will be soooooo much, it will be really stressful for her

    Reply
  103. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:31 pm

    @Payal:

    What blind item was that?

    Reply
  104. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:43 pm

    @Stella:
    I WANT ONE! :lol:

    Reply
  105. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    @Stella:
    OMG, they are so cute.

    Reply
  106. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Ya, crazy and not too bright.

    Reply
  107. Tetta said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):

    It´s awful to be so negative, but the lyrics to the song fits Angelina too well.

    Ian, please add some more words that show us who you are thinking of, Angelina or Jennifer !

    Reply
  108. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 4:56 pm

    @Guest2:
    That crazy woman thinks she’s so smart, but she looks like a fool…being called out on her lies, and she just says: Yea…I lied. Yikes! She’s like an alien from space or a snake from the depths of hell…whatever she is, it ain’t human! Hmm…she kinda reminds me of someone else… ;)

    Reply
  109. iwasanon said on February 27th, 2013 at 5:00 pm

    @Guest2:
    @Up the Coast:
    Why the pretense posing as Payal? Everyone here has already called her out. She should just cut the crap and go back to posting as WTF. Such childish games.

    Reply
  110. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Poor thing must have self-esteem issues :cry: and feels better pretending to be someone else…so sad.

    Reply
  111. Payal said on February 27th, 2013 at 5:24 pm

    @iwasanon:
    It is me! Sorry if I sound crazy if I don’t like justin but I’m ok otherwise promise! Lol

    Reply
  112. Up the Coast said on February 27th, 2013 at 5:31 pm

    @Guest2:
    You and I were talking about JArias, weren’t we? And…women (lying liars) who are like her ;)

    Reply
  113. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 5:51 pm

    @iwasanon:
    She thinks she’s smarter than the rest of us and can fool us into thinking she’s someone well liked since under her real moniker she managed to insult a lot of people. And I think she enjoys annoying people. She’s doing it over at Boho and I think on FF though with everyone a Guest there it’s harder to tell. Personally, I think she’s a little fruit loops. She hates jen and maybe seeing her so happy has finally pushed her over the edge.

    Reply
  114. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 5:59 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Maybe we were. She’s definitely a lying liar (I like that) but a dumb one since she’s contradicted herself so much. Dumb like another lying liar here. I’m not sure I think jolie’s dumb, though. She’s too shrewd of a manipulator.

    Reply
  115. Siska said on February 27th, 2013 at 6:52 pm

    @rushdog:I’m am crazy romantic..he.,he..thanks.

    Reply
  116. Siska said on February 27th, 2013 at 6:58 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Love it..

    Reply
  117. Siska said on February 27th, 2013 at 7:07 pm

    @Liz E.:I think you are one of very few brangie fans that is reasonable.
    I wish that the brangie really will choose a very private wedding for their kids and will seal the deal of their love ASAP.
    But from the previous pattern of them specially with two public paid publication of their kids and leg gate,etc..I don’t think their wedding will be hush hush..they will use it for pr and maybe get some money for their humanitarian,they are very clever in pr stuff,just like Jen and other HW player.
    I am agree with you that some of clues seem a bit silly,but it maybe because my brain don’t get clues,and I’m simple mind.,he..he..but it’s make sense for some people here. And I think it’s harmless for them to try to guess it,we never knew the truth anyway.

    Reply
  118. Siska said on February 27th, 2013 at 7:17 pm

    It is Payal@iwasanon:I understand that she is Jen fans who dislike justin.

    Reply
  119. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on February 27th, 2013 at 7:49 pm

    @Siska:

    I’m of the belief that Brad will never EVER, EVVVVVERRR marry Jolie, and it was just a pr stunt perpetrated by Jolie and her Jeweler, to force Brad’s hands….as he was taking to long to do it himself.

    Reply
  120. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 7:52 pm

    @Siska:
    It’s not payal, siska. It’s WTF pretending to be her. Read some old posts by payal, she has a completely different writing style. You’re right that she’s a jen fan who doesn’t like justin but this imposter is not a jen fan and you can tell that by the tone of her comments.

    Reply
  121. WCKitty said on February 27th, 2013 at 9:08 pm

    @Guest2:
    Hi Guest2. You are correct in that the writer does not sound at all like Payal. I guess a certain someone doesn’t have much of a life as the tone is that of a former poster.

    Reply
  122. Payal said on February 27th, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    It is me the real Payal! The one who went to jens premiere, I can even tell you my Facebook where my profile pic is of my two nephews, maybe I got carried away on the heat of the moment talking about Jen and justin but I swear to you it is me. My 180 on Jen probably shocked you. If you go back a good few months ago on a post I mentioned my changing feelings for Jen, Ill have to go back and find it.

    I’m sorry I still like Jen better than brangie but my feelings have changed. I hope that’s ok with everyone and I do not want to be forced to like justin or have his so called greatness showed down my throat.

    Reply
  123. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 10:59 pm

    @Payal:
    It’s been a long time since you posted here. How was your trip to India?

    Reply
  124. Guest2 said on February 27th, 2013 at 11:24 pm

    I just watched The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel and really enjoyed it. I love Maggie Smith and Judi Dench, both great actresses with beautiful faces untouched by botox and plastic surgery. I wish more actors and actresses would let themselves age gracefully instead of ending up looking like joan rivers.

    Reply
  125. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 12:23 am

    @Guest2:
    I do too.

    Reply
  126. WR said on February 28th, 2013 at 12:42 am

    I hope someone will clue me in on this. I am seeing a lot of blogs that feature hatred toward Anne Hathaway. I mean more than a few! I don’t understand how it started. What did she do? Personally, I haven’t seen or heard anything AH has said or done that deserves such hate-filled blogs. I even read that she has apologized for her oscar dress. What the heck? Has the cyberworld deteriorated that far? Apparently, it has! And no one has publicly come to her defense!

    Reply
  127. WR said on February 28th, 2013 at 12:45 am

    @Guest2:
    @ 3:25 p. m. I totally agree!

    Reply
  128. haki said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:44 am

    @payal

    It is a free country, and you are entitled to your opinion. You don’t have to like Justin Theroux.

    Reply
  129. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:36 am

    @WR:
    I did find her annoying during one awards ceremony where her name was misspelled and her first comment on stage was that they left the “e” off her name. It seemed a bit ungracious but other than that I don’t know why the hatred or why she apologized for the dress. It wasn’t my favorite dress but there certainly wasn’t anything to apologize for. I guess all it takes is one person to start something and it seems to spread like wildfire on the internet. It’s like the rumor that jen is a diva on the set of her new movie. It was started by one pap (who probably couldn’t get enough pics of her) and every tabloid and blogger picked it up. Supposedly the pap even commented on twitter that he was surprised at how his comment was picked up by everyone.

    Reply
  130. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:24 am

    @Payal:
    You do sound like the real Payal now so maybe I owe you and all the other nice people here an apology. But first you’ll have to tell me what you said after meeting jen at the premiere and then I’ll believe you for sure, lol.

    There is some really crazy stuff going on at FF where imposters are posting under the names of regulars and writing really vile, obscene things.

    Reply
  131. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:26 am

    @Guest2:

    I wrote 4 different parts about the premiere ultimately getting to my feelings about how I felt when I first saw her and how she gave me a hug, how I kept shouting Kevin huvanes name only to find his name was Stephen lol. I talked about how she smelt, how golden she was, how I felt when she hugged me etc etc, I still have those essays saved if you need them for proof lol.

    India was sensational, came back a while ago but have been down since because I miss it and my relatives so much plus I’ve been looking for a job and that’s hard to do. I’m always on IUC but haven’t posted as much because I didn’t really have much to say everybody was saying it lol. Plus all 4 had been quite recently so… I only spoke about Jen justin because they were being talked about and they came back into the media eye at the oscars. I just don’t want to be judged or attacked for disliking justin simple as, I’m not crazy or a bad person for it. Some people float your boat he doesn’t float mine. Another thing when I see Jen and him together I don’t FEEL the chemistry, people comment oh look at him her fixing his tie etc etc, all those things which people can say how perfect they look but love can be felt and those feelings don’t resonate for me. I get that chemistry from naomi watts and liev schriber (sorry for wrong spelling) I felt it from Michelle Williams and Heath ledger, johnny depp and Vanessa back before they fell apart. Something doesn’t sit right with me with JJ. Sorry.

    Reply
  132. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:27 am

    Oh and you don’t have to apologise silly lol, just try and understand my point of view even if you don’t agree with it.

    Reply
  133. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:49 am

    @Payal:
    I won’t try to change your mind about justin, you have a right to your opinion and who knows maybe you are right about him. For me, I’m glad she’s got him because she seems really happy and I think it will eventually put an end to the triangle if they marry. She’s taken so much abuse over the years from the fans of jolie I want to see that come to an end. As for lieb schreiber (sp?) there have been rumors of him cheating including with aj I think.

    Reply
  134. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:54 am

    I wonder if there’s any connection between the exercise equipment truck at the pitt home and the release of the wedding news. It just seems like curious timing. But maybe People has known about this for a while and decided to hold the story until after the Oscars when jen and justin would be seen together on the red carpet just to maximize the impact of the story. Still, it’s not like jen release such private information like that.

    Reply
  135. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 11:08 am

    @Guest2:

    Ah ok I don’t like liev now lol. I Always get the vibe justin enjoys more of how u described him rather than the actual relationship. I don’t like the fact that it is seen that Jens happiness is because of justin, that’s stupid because was Jen a miserable fool before she met him, I don’t think so. Do all the people in her life, who loved and cared and respected her who gave her time and nurtured her through her difficuts moments, just wasn’t there then and now he has to be number 1, that’s unfortunate IMO. b are they nothing now compared to him, was she not ahppy by them that he seems above them, I hope not she always said her friends meant everything to her but now who knows, justin has changed the landscape and I don’t like it.

    I detest John mayer and even like justin compared to him but while Jen was with mayer, I never felt a change in her or behaviour, opinions and lifestyle like I do now.

    Reply
  136. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 11:47 am

    It’s probably a dungeon building kit in disguise for their grotto sexcapades. lol@Guest2:

    Reply
  137. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 11:50 am

    Hope you don’t mind if I butt in here, but I think the difference is that some can see she’s truly in love with Justin. It’s made a huge difference in how she glows, is more outgoing, and has been willing to comment about their relationship in interviews imo. Everyone loves a happy ending, and hopefully this is hers. No one deserves it more than she does after the years of bullying by the press over an unfaithful husband and his baby mamma. @Payal:

    Reply
  138. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 12:01 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I understand that and I want brangie and the loons to pay as well. But I just hate this portrayal that justin is a saviour and hero who saved her and that if it wasn’t for him she would dark and depressed which is bull. I think she is strong enough with or without a man and with her friends she dealt with that storm woth integrity and came out stronger and after that she met justin. I just don’t want him to get credit for her rebirth or strength. I hate when there is no individuality in relationships and you begin associate one partner with everything the other is. There’s no room top breathe I hate that. And I get that sense of entitlement from him, where he is like look everyone IM Jens fiancé, she loves ME.

    Reply
  139. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:06 pm

    It’s all about individual perception so I get that you feel the paps are making out as if Jennifer needs Justin to feel fulfilled and happy but that’s not what I get from her interviews or the videos of them exchanging comments, glances, laughs. Jennifer hasn’t looked this relaxed and confident since before her ex-husband cheated on her publicly imo, so I’m going with what she tells us in her interviews: Justin makes her happier than she’s been in years and she’s committing herself to a lifetime shared with him. As for Justin, you can go to IMDB.com and look up his resume’ and works and you will find he’s more deeply intrenched with the world of entertainment and A-List celebrities than Jennifer is actually, as well as having a family of scholars/intellectuals. He’s got plenty of cash of his own btw, being successful at writing screen plays and a long time acting career. I’d say Jennifer is correct in saying they are so well matched in all ways. BUT, having said that, I understand you have your right to form an opinion based on your beliefs as well. I’m just glad she’s out of that Brad Pitt mess because that man never was nor will be a great actor and he’s pulled the same scam on the public as Angie – smoke and mirrors and press manipulation to create the illusion of being great, successful and desired. Good riddance to both of them.@Payal:

    Reply
  140. haki said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:11 pm

    @ payal

    Obviously, both Brad nor Jen have never had the kind of glow or “that something special” with their new partners (Angie and Justin that is)..but life goes on. Brad has moved on long ago, and so must Jen.
    Justin is more reserved than Brad was, and he seems to make Jen happy. Having said that I hope that Jen has a prenup. After all this will be another Hollywood marriage, and we all know how most of those HW marriages end!

    Reply
  141. haki said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:16 pm

    Folks, I know I’ve said that I was done commenting here months ago, but alas, I couldn’t help myself! I hope you don’t mind me doings so here and there.. This is the only blog that I ever comment on where the poster actually agree to disagree and seems to get along!

    Reply
  142. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:39 pm

    It’s Official…we have been de-Poped :( We’re sitting on the edge of Sequester :shock: And we’re not even sure WHO the real payal is. But haki is right…..WE can still agree to disagree, so why can’t the rest of the world do it???

    Reply
  143. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:52 pm

    Maybe if we could get all the world leaders to start a blog such as this one where they can work things out in a respectful and adult way? I wonder if Obama knows how to surf the net? Sigh.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  144. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:52 pm

    @haki:
    I forgot you said you were done and you don’t need to explain your enjoyment of this site as I think we all understand. It’s just a place to chat and have fun.

    Reply
  145. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:54 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Could be, lol. I was thinking that if it was really a moving truck jen might want to distance herself from that by letting it be known she’s getting married.

    Reply
  146. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:56 pm

    True G2, this site has evolved over the years into a comfortable chat area where everyone can express their opinion and know , for the most part, they will not be attacked or called juvinile names for doing so. Sure, we still have a few neanderthals posting occassionally which is a given. Ignoring those who can not hold a reasonable discussion and therefore resort to bullying…and the chat goes on. It’s fun to sit at my computer drinking my morning coffee and reading all the comments. It’s a good place to be.@Guest2:

    Reply
  147. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 1:58 pm

    LOL, I get that! It would be frightening to consider Brad still trying to “come home” after all his accumulated baggage. It’s clear that all parties have moved on, and that some have moved on for a second time ( cough, cough, Brad Pitt )….so one would think the loons would have evolved as well. Is that hoping for too much? @Guest2:

    Reply
  148. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:00 pm

    @Payal:
    I think jen may have contributed to that notion when she referred to justn as her protector. There were some clues quite a while back where we thought the relationship started out as him being a cover for her but then it grew into something else. I don’t recall the clue but I remember Ian saying it’s as real as Y2K which we know now was a real threat but greatly overblown.

    Reply
  149. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:01 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Good question. Being able to have rational (ok there are those couple of posters) conversations with other posters/people that you don’t always agree with is foreign to me. I was never able to do so while growing-up so my world is still expanding in the right direction.

    If you are truly the real payal, I apologize. I also lurk over at FF and the loons are going ballistic with the posts. I’m not a Justin fan, but it’s Jen’s life and I hope that she is happy. @Payal:

    Reply
  150. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:03 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    That’s quite the castle he’s going to live in isn’t it? So did he resign because of ill health or was there some other reason? It happened so fast. He’s a pope, shouldn’t he give more than a two or three week notice that he’s retiring? I would give my company more notice than that and I’m not the leader of anything. Will we ever know the truth?

    Reply
  151. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Loons evolve? Highly doubtful, lol. Have you seen that disgusting thread at FF started by some loon pretending to be MaryT? There actually are a couple of threads now that are vile. Sometimes I think the subject of the gossip site actually does the posting there.

    Reply
  152. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:09 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Could you imagine the comedy skits that could be made from that scenario! 8O

    Reply
  153. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:11 pm

    @Guest2:
    The worse one IMO, is the one about miscarriages.

    Reply
  154. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:13 pm

    @Payal:

    Justin changed the landscape and I like it. Jennifer seemed to be perfectly happy together with her friends before she met Justin. I don´t know if you ever has experienced love or the luck to be with someone who you never need to lie for or put up a certain face for. It´s something really special. And I don´t think you miss this feeling until you once have had it. It´s ok to live without a partner and still be happy. But you can´t blame someone for feeling more happy together with someone. It´s a part of the biological nature. Even some animals live together with a partner. Do you blame them too ? What´s important to point out is that you don´t need a partner to be lucky. But if you meet someone who makes you feel very good and comfortable you can´t deny yourself to share your life with that person. If you do that it´s called jealousy. You have your right to not like Justin but you don´t need to convince the rest of us that he´s a bad guy. To me he seems to be an adult mature intelligent man who has a great kind of humor. And the fact he seems to love Jennifer makes him still more likable.

    Reply
  155. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:14 pm

    I read on FF occassionally, but avoid it if my curiosity doesn’t get the best of me due to major news release. I was shocked at some of the vile comments made that – truly. I wonder if any of those people are married? have children? work in public facilities? If yes to any or all ? then goodness help us all. Such hateful, twisted minds are hard to fathom. Now, on the other hand, some of their posters have been a real joy to read, very enlightening, logical discussions and of course the photoshopper does fantastic gifs. Those alone are worth risking having my eyeballs explode in shock at some of the LOONatic comments.@Guest2:

    Reply
  156. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:16 pm

    That’s how I feel as well Tetta. Good Morning btw.@Tetta:

    Reply
  157. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:23 pm

    Payal says: “I just don’t want him to get credit for her rebirth or strength. I hate when there is no individuality in relationships and you begin associate one partner with everything the other is. There’s no room top breathe I hate that.”
    That comment sounds more like someone who has been in a few bad relationships and they’re projecting, not like the young woman who used to post here….asking us which classes she should choose to take….a young woman who didn’t seem to have any experience with men at all. Just sayin’….

    Reply
  158. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:27 pm

    @Guest2:
    It has to be something BIG, imo.

    Reply
  159. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    @Tetta:
    +1 Nicely said Tetta, I agree. And I was not a JT fan at first, but he has been growing on me.

    Reply
  160. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:40 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I haven’t seen that one but I’ll try to avoid it. The one I was talking about is pornographic and involves jen/justin which is why I think aj posts comments there. The thread was started in the name of another poster from the JA thread who posts all the great pics on that thread (it’s my go-to place for jen news, by the way, so thanks to any FF’rs who contribute to that thread and lurk here). It’s happened a few times there (here too) and maybe it’s why I wasn’t sure this is the real Payal.

    Reply
  161. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:40 pm

    A bit OT….the real sequester occured last weekend, when Obama and Reggie Love was “sequestered” at Tiger’s house ;) where there was a whole lotta lovin’ goin’ on :lol: and that’s why the media black-out occurred. That’s also why Michelle was all over your tv screen….don’t look here, look there.

    Reply
  162. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:44 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Fgs it is me and I don’t need to have been in adult relationships to talk about them, but I have witnessed relationships, so I’m not completely oblivious to them

    And I graduated last month, looking for a job until I start my lpc course in October. Still don’t believe me?

    I think we are going to agree to disagree, I like all of you so I feel hurt to be jumped on for my opinions. Justin wins everyone happy now?

    Reply
  163. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:49 pm

    @Guest2:
    I haven’t seen that one. There is a poster “CAPSIE”? whose posts are just really ____ and “it” has a real obsession for Jen to the point of blowing-up photos of Jen’s crotch while she is in a swimsuit!!! What kind of person does that? 8O On the other hand, I agree that there are some wonderful posters over there and I really enjoy reading what they have to say just like I enjoy the viewpoints of the posters here at IUC.

    Reply
  164. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:51 pm

    @Payal:
    I don’t care if you like him or not….I had my own doubts about him, but I don’t have to live with him and neither do you (thank goodness). But…it’s not like he’s Chris Brown and Jen is Rhianna :shock: You were dissing on Jen as though SHE had ‘done you wrong’ and it was a bit unsettling to “watch”….that’s all.
    You have the right to dislike Justin….but can you explain this feeling you have about him acting like he’s “posh”? What does that mean, exactly?

    Reply
  165. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 2:58 pm

    I think brangie has made their own excellent comedy sketches. Leg Gate at the Oscars, and the now infamously ridiculed Chanel #5 commercial. The years they have spent working so hard to create the illusion of success in all things they do has taken a physical toll on both. Angie can now pass for a 50 y/o Michael Jackson ( the nose), and Brad , well, as Bette Midler tweeted on Oscar night, “Who is that homeless man shilling for Chanel?)….Brad is a joke, a characture of what he wanted to be. Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving pair.@WCKitty:

    Reply
  166. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:04 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Capsie is a weirdo for sure. But I don’t think she’s the one who started the porno thread. It’s xx-rated.

    Reply
  167. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:06 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I don’t recall ever calling him posh, when did I say that?

    Reply
  168. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    I don’t know about anyone else but I want to see those adorable (and very well dressed) shetland ponies leap and prance. If they do attend the brangie nuptials I hope there is video of them dancing (the ponies, not brangie) because that would be the most interesting part of their wedding. It’s gonna happen soon because it’s gotta be in the kids’ lifetime and the oldest is now 11 going on 12.

    Reply
  169. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:14 pm

    @Guest2:
    I haven’t come across that thread, so thanks for the warning. 8O

    Reply
  170. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I agree, I just had an image of Jen running around saying “no, no, no!!!”, while bolting the doors and turning off the lights. I don’t understand why Chanel used Brad for their commercial since the only message IMO that would relate to him is “Chanel, wonderfully scented perfume designed by the French for is original intended use…to cover-up foul body odors due to bad body hygiene.” BTW, I have nothing against the French.

    Reply
  171. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:38 pm

    @Payal:
    My mistake :oops: It’s more like you are looking down your nose at him, at least that’s how it appears to me…as I read your various comments I have come across. Could it be that he’s a bit shy, and it comes off as being arrogant? Cuz initially, I got a strange vibe from him also….but the more I see him, the more I can see that he does back off and let Jen do her thing…and he doesn’t smother her when she’s working, and vice versa. Anyway….I don’t want to fight with you, but you have set off my ‘radar’ with your change in demeanor, and that is all. xxx

    Reply
  172. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:49 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Noooo I would never look down at anybody. That’s not who I am, I come from humble backgrounds and not been raised like that. I think I meant I think he behaves like that, thinks he’s above. Some of his comments I’ve seen from previous interviews about people and things just comes across as plain rude, like he has to have opinion on everything and its usually cynical and negative. Actually quite like that pathetic ex husband of hers.

    But let’s stop the justin discussions and agree to disagree. I love this place and the people here to much to let petty arguments about him ruin it.

    Reply
  173. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 3:59 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    You were not the only one who had doubts about Justin. When the first photos of him were published he looked dangerous with his long dark hair and beard. It was a relief when Jennifer also said “he looked like a serial killer”. But it was a proof she had looked behind the surface and had found out what was inside. If I look at Justin´s surface it was first when I saw Justin in short hair and a white shirt I thought that perhaps it isn´t that bad after all. But after that , when he was interviewed before the premiere of “Wandelust” and he showed he had a brain too I realized it was only to congratulate Jennifer for finding this man. I admit I was shallow but at least I changed my mind.

    Reply
  174. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 4:03 pm

    @Payal:

    We have reached a long way when we are able to agree that we disagree :)

    Reply
  175. liv4 said on February 28th, 2013 at 4:48 pm

    New twitter pic by Ian. A blonde and brunette communicating?

    Reply
  176. liv4 said on February 28th, 2013 at 4:50 pm

    No, that’s not what they are doing. Ya got me.

    Reply
  177. Guest1 said on February 28th, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    @Guest2:
    The first thought I had when I read the shetland ponies are all the presents they will be leaving for the jolie-pitts as they are leaping and and prancing. I wonder if they also pee like a horse!

    Reply
  178. Payal said on February 28th, 2013 at 4:59 pm

    @Tetta:

    Yup we have to be better than the loons! Lol

    Looking at that picture again. It looks slightly unnerving because even though the lady is smiling the baby is all hidden and I just thought of jolie adopting (kidnapping) another kid secretly in the middle of the night type scenario.

    New twitter picture have no idea, the blond in red dress suggests to me Ian is hinting at Jen? But Jen doesn’t even look remotely like that. Have no idea about the brunette.

    Reply
  179. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    @liv4:
    Not sure what to make of the twitter pic but I found Ian’s comment to Payal really interesting.

    Reply
  180. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:17 pm

    @Guest2:

    When Ian answer Payal´s question in that way I think it´s absolutely necessary that Ian steps forward and explain how he know this. And the answer should be in plain english and not in another clue or tweet and it should be NOW. It´s really mean of Ian to express himself like that.

    Reply
  181. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:20 pm

    The picture in the tweet: To me it seems like the woman in the red dress stands behind a desk and talks in a loudspeaker. The women in dark hair tells her what to say. Is it Courtney or Angelina ?

    Reply
  182. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:23 pm

    @Tetta:

    Excuse the bad grammar. My english gets worse when I´m angry.

    Reply
  183. Guest1 said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:27 pm

    Is Ian saying the relationship won’t last, or Payal’s doubts about Justin?

    Reply
  184. sinker said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    OT, so very OT, but here goes. Ian, wondering if you know anything about Alison Lohman? I loved her acting and she has all but disappeared. There was a blind a few years back about an actress who’s was beaten by her b.f. right before walking the red carpet and many thought it was her for “drag me to hell.” I haven’t heard a peep about her since.

    Reply
  185. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:41 pm

    @Guest1:
    :lol: O M G!!!! You are absolutely right :shock:

    Reply
  186. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 5:51 pm

    @Guest1:

    Is it correct to answer “it” referring to “My doubts” ?

    Reply
  187. rushdog said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:01 pm

    @liv4:
    Yes based on Ian’s bingo to UTC.

    Reply
  188. rushdog said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:10 pm

    @Tetta:
    I think it somehow means both of them but maybe each in a different way.

    Reply
  189. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:28 pm

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BEKJfZWCEAEo3ua.jpg

    The photo Ian recently posted on his Twitter account

    I think it’s only fair of Ian to include his posters on IUC in his discussions about Jennifer and Justin and Brad and Angie as he began this on IUC over four years ago and many posters here have been loyal to him for all that time. I also note he uses the link to IUC on his Twitter page, ergo others will see it there and follow it to this blog. It is grossly unfair of Ian to expect all posters here to go to Twitter to see what the updates are since he USED to give us helpful hints here pre his Twitter days. I like to bring the links to the posted Twitter photos to IUC to be fair to his posters her, so they share in that information as well. He has conversations with IUC posters on Twitter, so that too is not included to his IUC posters unless someone ccp’s and brings them over.

    payal‏@payald30

    @IanUnderCover Ian please answer me, I dont like justin and I don’t trust his and Jens relationship, am I right in my doubts?

    Expand

    2 hrsIan Halperin‏@IanUnderCover

    @payald30 it won’t last.

    Expand

    40 minspayal‏@payald30

    @IanUnderCover thank u. If i may is this upcoming marriage going to happen? Or was it put out there for a bigger plan?

    Expand

    Reply
  190. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:29 pm

    I expect my post at 6:28 pm to disappear at any moment.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  191. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    @rushdog:

    Rushdog, your answer is as cryptic as Ian´s is. Do you two work together ?
    :lol: :lol:

    Reply
  192. rushdog said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I was at the National Archives with my sister today. It had been many years since the last time. Was so very moved looking at the very faded Declaration and The Constitution. My sister commented “can you imagine Congress today coming to an agreement on everything in these documents?” I said it would never happen, too many people and too political.

    Reply
  193. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:43 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Thank You for expressing your feelings in a appropriate way. I meant the same and I guess you and I are not alone in this. It feels like a big betrayal from Ian´s side.

    Reply
  194. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:45 pm

    I think Ian just needs to know how we posters on IUC feel. Sometimes when a person has many irons in the same fire they tend to overlook details. Perhaps he doesn’t realize how RUDE it is to be posting on Twitter comments his IUC posters would die for and have waited for , for such a long time. Maybe Ian needs to appoint someone, if he hasn’t already, to help with IUC….work with us posters, help with clues, etc. That would be a boon to us all. What about it big guy? Do you still have some love left for us little ole IUC posters?/@Tetta:

    Reply
  195. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:57 pm

    @rushdog:
    And that, in itself, should be a big CLUE to ALL Americans! We are getting closer and closer to the tipping point…and looking more and more like a third world country.

    Reply
  196. haki said on February 28th, 2013 at 6:57 pm

    You know, I find it very interesting and ironic how Brad (so rudely) complained that Jen was boring AND YET she is now getting ready to marry into a very intelligent and talented man and his equally interesting and intelligent family the THEROUXs!!

    Reply
  197. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:00 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Ian treats us like we’re his red headed step-children :cry: Like he’s Chris Brown and we’re all Rhianna :shock:

    Reply
  198. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:08 pm

    @haki:
    Lucky for Brad…as long as he’s tied to joLIE, she will make sure he never has time to get bored. She’ll keep the drama coming.

    Reply
  199. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:12 pm

    LOL, that’s a certainty. Angie is so far “out there” the drama will never end for Brad, but then maybe that’s the life he enjoys? Lots of fighting, raunchy sex, freedome to take anyone, male or female , to bed when he wants…not married after all. Angie certainly does it, so then it would seem Brad has what he wants. The illusion of a family lilfe, Angie + six kids while still doing Hash with buddies like QT, or his frequent trips to Amsterdam, open sex life for both Brad and Angie, and goodness knows what else they engage in. It’s a mutural relationship imo, and one is just as devient as the other.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  200. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:16 pm

    What do you think about the White House threats against Bob Woodward the jurno? Did you see another one came forward that has also been threatened by Obama’s team, not to speak up….Constitution people???

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/28/white-house-denies-staffer-threatened-watergate-journalist-woodward/

    Reply
  201. fluffy said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:17 pm

    Remember the days when Ian would comment on posts however, he never seems to respond. I think that Ian knows the truth regarding BP/AJ and JA/JT! However, now his clues are very cryptic . Maybe someone has threatened him JMO

    Reply
  202. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:17 pm

    The latest claim comes from Lanny Davis, who served as counsel to former President Bill Clinton and later went on to write a column for The Washington Times. In a radio interview on WMAL, Davis said that a “senior Obama White House official” once called his editor at the Times and said that if the paper continued to run his columns, “his reporters would lose their credentials.”

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/28/white-house-denies-staffer-threatened-watergate-journalist-woodward/#ixzz2MErXf1DW

    Reply
  203. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:20 pm

    @Tetta:
    Maybe they are both being directed on what to say and do?

    A baby isn’t always literally a child. Sometimes it is something such as a project.

    Reply
  204. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:25 pm

    yes I remember those times. In fact do you remember the live shows we could sign-in and watch here in real time? Post our questions to people such as Noah Levy Senior Editor of In Touch magazine? They’d come right out and say it like it was….it was great. We had such fun then.

    I know Ian’s publisher , Transit, was threatened over the content of his book Brangelina, that was published in 2009, but Ian did manage to get some juicy tid-bits in it never the less. You’ll also notice that Brangie has lost the power it once had, and many media outlets are no longer treating them as “special” . Many are aware the end is nearing quickly, so one would think now would be the time to share interest in what is known. In any case, it would be nice not to have to find a few who can bring what’s posted on Twitter here so we can all receive the same information in the same time frame. Expecially as we are working his riddles here so diligently.@fluffy:

    Reply
  205. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:51 pm

    @WCKitty:

    Let´s hope it´s a project. If the two women in the tweet photo are talking about a baby I get really scared ! Maybe AJ and JA are planning a double-wedding or how to sync their wedding days to get as much attention as possible. But I don´t like it as it seems the dark woman tells the other woman what to say. I would prefer it the other way around.

    Reply
  206. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:53 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    It appears that the bloom is off the rose ;) And David Plouffe is a punk ass thug :evil: Like I said earlier….the media needs to start talking MORE about why Obama was “sequestered” away last weekend with Reggie Love at Tiger’s place! He was there….no access to anyone. Michelle was everywhere! These people work for us dammit! We have a right to know who the hell they are and what they are doing.

    Reply
  207. WCKitty said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:54 pm

    @Tetta:
    I agree with you that it would be scary if Angelina is telling Jen what to do (as in directing). I just got the idea that maybe both of them are being told what to do because it looks like Angie is reading something like a tweet and then telling Jen what it says to do. Who is directing them?

    Reply
  208. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 7:57 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    If Ian has or will have somebody to take part in the clues I would prefer someone who could speak in real sentences, not in cryptic clues.

    Reply
  209. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:05 pm

    @WCKitty:

    It´s hard to guess. Who is able to direct AJ ? Not Brad. I don´t believe he could direct JA either. Obama ? Hauge ? Clinton ? Or Quintin Tarantino ? Perhaps the last one. It´s the only one I can think of that both women would listen to.

    Reply
  210. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:16 pm

    I think the blond in the red dress is a Disk Jockey or DJ as they are known. The pioneer turntable is part of their equipment. The brunette on the cell phone seems to be taking a request. I could be wrong though, not much direction to this one.@Tetta:

    Reply
  211. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:20 pm

    Wow, is Ian in the dog house with his loyal followers? Tsk, tsk, I think the only way he gets out is to give us a BIG, JUICY clue. It’s quite possible he was just giving payal his opinion that it wouldn’t last based on how he perceives justin and not on any information he has. I don’t know but for now I will take things at face value and see what shenanigans brangelina (or is it now just brad and just angelina) comes up with? That will be interesting.

    Reply
  212. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    Tsk, tsk is RIGHT!

    Reply
  213. fluffy said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:46 pm

    Guest 2

    I think that Ian does no something about Justin! IMO that way he has tagged this clue to suggest the JA/JT relationship may be not real. Why would Ian feel that ” it won’t last ” unless he had substantial information about the couple.

    Rush Dog

    Do you remember the Mr Bradport post? I think the is the wrong name but there was a dog called Poko that we thought was JA and the Mr was Brad controlling the show.

    Reply
  214. Tetta said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Then perhaps we can say that Ian thinks Jennifer does what her public wants her to do. Most people wants her to be happy. Therefor she looks very happy in public but behind the scene she isn´t that lucky. At least I hope she´s not unhappy.

    Reply
  215. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:56 pm

    Oh my gosh~! That was SO cute! Hubby had heard a tiny kitten mewing for two days, on the third day of searching he knew it was now or never as the mewing had gotten so weak. Finally he tracked the little fella down hiding under the center console of our neighbor’s pontoon boat. So this guy crawls up the trailer and into the boat and struggles for an hour to reach it. When he does, he wraps it in a towel and brings it home. We went to the vet and bought pet baby bottles and kitten formula. He had fed that baby every two hours for two weeks until it could eat on it’s own….it now has a furever home of it’s own and is named Mr. Lucky.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  216. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:57 pm

    And on that thought, maybe “it won’t last” means the Triangle. Jen is leaving any connection behind when she becomes Mrs. Justin Theroux in a few weeks.@Tetta:

    Reply
  217. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 8:59 pm

    LOL, noooo, Ian could never be put in a dog house by anyone, as he says, put your big boy panties on….just reminding him of our presence here.@Guest2:

    Reply
  218. fluffy said on February 28th, 2013 at 9:01 pm

    Patty Anne

    I hope your right and I am wrong! That would be a great outcome.

    PS I love cats too! I have a Seal Point Birman and her name is Bella.

    Reply
  219. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 9:07 pm

    She sounds beautiful~! My love was a 25 year old ( human years) Seal Point Siamese named Suki. I loved her dearly. You know how special those cats are…..but now I just take in any homeless critter ( non human ) who comes to my door. Fortunately hubby is a softie as well.@fluffy:

    Reply
  220. fluffy said on February 28th, 2013 at 9:23 pm

    Patty Anne

    Wow Suki was 25 years old! You must of taken great care of her as I have never heard of a Pedigree cat living that long. The fact that take in homeless animals show that you and your hubby are in deed wonderful people.

    I am from Sydney Australia and i have had friends who have travelled to the US and they say the the American people are so nice and friendly.

    Reply
  221. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 9:37 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I know, I was just taunting him into giving us a real clue. But don’t let him know that.

    Reply
  222. Guest2 said on February 28th, 2013 at 9:55 pm

    @fluffy:
    There have been enough clues to suggest the relationship isn’t real and based on our reactions when he posts anything to this effect I don’t think he will say too much about it. But I will say this, if the relationship isn’t real and they are just acting then, damn, give her an oscar right now because that’s the best job of acting I’ve ever seen from her. Of course, there were moments on the rc when I thought they were deliberately laying it on thick and having fun with it. Ian didn’t specify whether it wouldn’t last becasue justin is a creep or that it wouldn’t last because it’s not a real relationship so I think I’m gonna believe it’s real until I have a reason not to. I like jen and she looks happy after all the sh*t she had to put up with so I’m wishing the best for her.

    Reply
  223. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:07 pm

    @Guest2:
    Odviously, we don’t come here for the insider info ;) it’s all about the great camaraderie :) We are smart enough to see what the truth is, when it comes to these silly celebs…none of us were born yesterday.

    Reply
  224. Patty Anne said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    Thanks for that fluffy, and you are a delight to chat with as well. I had a long time g/f who lives in New Zealand and her one goal in life was to sell her landscaping business and more to Australia. She would tell me what a heavenly place it is and filled with friendly blokes. She must have made it because I never hear from her anymore. @fluffy:

    Reply
  225. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Now, just imagine Mr. Lucky playing with Mr. Wombat :)

    Reply
  226. iwasanon said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:40 pm

    @Payal:
    Payal, obviously I also thought someone was posing as you because your posts sounded off so I’ll believe for now it is you.
    Just to be clear, I don’t care if you don’t like Justin and I think it’s pretty clear that most of the others here don’t care either. You are entitled to your opinion and you’ve had that same opinion since the beginning.

    In fact, I don’t care who you like or don’t like in Hollywood but when you say things like
    “Jason Bateman has that same dry sarcastic humor and again he’s one of justin type people that she only wants to be around” or calling Bateman “low brow people” , it seems a little strange since Jen was hanging with him years ago back in the early 90’s, so Justin has nothing to do with her being friends with him.
    Your image of Jen doesn’t seem to fit with reality. JMO

    Reply
  227. rushdog said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:43 pm

    @WR:
    My take on Anne and negativity – she’s been all over the news for quite a while and people get sick of it same as with other celebrities. She tends to drone on in a…self-important, sacchariny way (not exactly the words I want) with her acceptance speeches. And she appears to have played the HW game this year and that may be disappointing to some. I think she’s extremely talented and has a long future in the business but I need to just ignore her sometimes because she gets to be too much. I haven’t read her apology about the dress but I saw an early pic of her at the awards and her nips were showing (quite clearly) so I’m guessing that might have something to do with an apology.

    Reply
  228. fluffy said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:49 pm

    Guest 2

    I agree Jen looks very happy and radiant! I agree that they both look very happy and natural together.
    Jen Aniston is real and beautiful and I just love her and want her to be happy.
    Like you I just want the best for Jen as she deserves happiness after the press treatment she received after her break up with Pitt. (eg not wanting children ) To suffer two miscarriages and then be accused of not wanting children is just disgraceful.

    I used to be a great Brad Pitt fan however, I now would not bother going to see a movie with him staring in
    A/J was once a beautiful woman but Karma has caught up with her and she has not aged well .
    I am shocked when I look at photos of her 8 years ago compared to today.

    Conversely JA gets better with age

    Reply
  229. iwasanon said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:51 pm

    @Guest2:
    @Patty Anne:
    Well he’s in the dog house with me. Yea it ticks me off that we’ve been begging for feedback here for months. Something to tell us if we’re going in the right direction. 600 posts on Joly mod, 700 post on swap shop etc. Yes, I’m ticked. And let me be clear, I’m not ticked at payal (she just asked the question) but I am ticked at Ian.

    Reply
  230. liv4 said on February 28th, 2013 at 10:52 pm

    I’m being completely neutral here and just pointing out some things I think may be pertinent. I find it interesting when you click on the tag “Oscar” it doesn’t take you to as many previous clues as does putting “Oscar” in the search box. It takes you to two specific clues, one being obvious that the Mayer/JA Oscar appearance was a fake relationship. Same thing with JPs. It takes you to two clues, one of which led most posters at that time to believe that the JT/JA relationship was fake.

    I agree with Patty Anne that the new twitter pic looks like a DJ set-up with a dark-haired woman and a blonde woman communicating, working together; one communicating requests to another who plays them.

    I think if any of this is true all parties are playing a dangerous game with their reputations and fan base. I don’t think the JPs reputations can get much worse but JA’s reputation is the golden girl right now. Everything having to do with clues is subjective. I think that is why “it won’t last” is so disturbing.

    Reply
  231. rushdog said on February 28th, 2013 at 11:10 pm

    My take on the latest tweet (I hope I can express my thoughts so they make sense!)…I think the two women in the photo are meant to represent the two women in the triangle. The blonde appears to be a dj or talking into something and the brunette woman is blurred and appears to be giving instructions to the blonde. Imo he’s saying that the public actions/comments by the blonde are affected by the actions/decisions of the brunette but NOT that the brunette is directly controlling her with instructions. The brunette may be more of a presence in the background. I think this fits with the riddles of ‘11. I have never been fully on board with the JA/JTx relationship despite it appearing more real in recent months and both of them looking happy and relaxed. The riddles have always said something different to me.

    Payal (and I believe it’s really you!) clearly asked Ian about Jen and Justin. His response “it won’t last”…I think he means it was never meant to last…”busted and disgusted”.

    http://ianundercover.com/2012/06/11/iuc-world-exclusive-just-go-with-it-grooving-in-the-garden/#comments

    Reply
  232. Up the Coast said on February 28th, 2013 at 11:46 pm

    @rushdog:
    Maybe he meant that her “doubts” won’t last.

    Reply
  233. rushdog said on February 28th, 2013 at 11:55 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Lol, we could analyze Halpernese forever and still not really know!!

    “it won’t last” – are doubts an “it”?
    Payal said she didn’t trust the relationship. I think that’s the “it”

    Reply
  234. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 12:36 am

    I know that hollywood is filled with fake relationships but it’s unimaginable to me that jen could be part of such an elaborate hoax and look as happy and relaxed as she does. It’s going on two years now, they’ve pretty much confirmed they’re getting married in the near future so what are they going to do next? Do they get married and keep the game going or suddenly break up asking us to please respect their privacy? There was a post (not the one linked above) where someone told Ian that when jen gets to know the real justin she’ll run for the hills (or something to that effect). Maybe that’s what Ian meant by it won’t last. He knows something about justin we don’t know and if that’s the case then I think he should spill the info.

    Reply
  235. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 12:46 am

    @Guest2:
    The clues have been somewhat contradictory. In some it seemed the message was that this is a fake relationship and in others it was that jen doesn’t know the real justin and when she finds out the relationship will crumble like a house of cards (I think that’s what he said). So which is it?

    Reply
  236. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 12:49 am

    @rushdog:
    This is ounding a little bit like clintonspeak…It depends on what his definition of “it” is.

    Good night all. I can’t take any more of this. :)

    Reply
  237. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 12:50 am

    @Guest2:
    …sounding….

    Reply
  238. Tetta said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:41 am

    @rushdog:

    ” Payal (and I believe it’s really you!) clearly asked Ian about Jen and Justin. His response “it won’t last”…I think he means it was never meant to last…”busted and disgusted”.”

    So you admit that you think Ian gave the wrong answer to Payal ? It would be interesting to know what Ian himself means. It´s very comfortable with clues. It´s possible to bend and shape the meaning of them after the situation.

    Reply
  239. WR said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:53 am

    Re: Pope Benedict XVI: He’s been a hot topic among my acquaintances. The consensus is that he’s had the weight of the world on his 86 y/o shoulders. He was betrayed by his butler. He has been under pressure from liberal sources within and outside the Catholic Church. For an older man to be working in a chaotic atmosphere is just too much, so we say.

    Thanks to those who replied regarding Anne Hathaway. It brought some insight. I can’t, of course, feel that it’s the right thing to do; i. e. the hatred the web sites publish so freely. And there is the stuff they won’t publish. It’s their pov, or none!
    Just wondering how long are they going to be free. I already have to subscribe if I want to continue reading The New York Times.
    Perhaps it’s back to reading hardback books. At least there one doesn’t have to deal with pop-ups, spams or viruses.

    Reply
  240. WR said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:56 am

    Vell, it’s close to midnite. Let’s see if March will roar in like a lion! Tomorrow, then!

    Reply
  241. P. Gold said on March 1st, 2013 at 5:37 am

    Girls, why worry whether it’ll last or wont last. I doubt Ian’s marriage will last too. We’re talking about HW and people in the entertainment industry, so ” it wont last statement” shouldnt sounb like end of the world for us. Just take things easy and live in the present. Who could have predicted Jen’s marriage to Brad wont last back then?

    Reply
  242. Mistory said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:30 am

    At FF

    Jolie & Brad Pitt Engagement IS a Stunt for a failing brand
    Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:27 pm

    Jolie & Brad Pitt Engagement IS a Stunt for a failing brand

    Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s recent engagement announcement was a “desperate attempt to avoid seeing the Brangie brand collapse,” according to two sources close to the notorious couple to Ian H.

    “Their star has dwindled the last year,” one source told journalist H on his siteover.com.

    “They needed something to generate the press they used to get. So they decided to go with the engagement thing.

    “It was all pre orchestrated, hoping to turn it into loads of media attention to revive their brand.

    See Our Article: Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt Are Engaged; Break Gay Marriage Promise

    “The couple is a major brand and are worth millions together. That’s a primary reason why they stay together. If they split they’d be worth pennies.”

    Pitt and Jolie have been on the verge of separation and a breakup accoring to H and other publications.

    The engagement ring is a similar publicity stunt to Angelina flaunting her right leg all over the 2012 Oscars and Brad pedging to buy the historic gay club The Boom Boom Room in Laguna Beach, CA with George Clooney. Or, it is similar to him wearing dresses in several different gay themed photoshoots.

    Another source close to the Brangelina couple said to H: “Brad and Angie don’t win Oscars and they don’t receive the kind of money for making films they used to.

    “Studios look at them as being has-been.

    “They are praying that the engagement ring revives everything. I wish them luck.”

    Pitt and Jolie’s engagement announcement was a break in their promise that they would not get married until gay marriage was legal in all states and all people in the U.S. were able to be married.

    na Jolie & Brad Pitt Are Planning Sham Wedding

    Jolie is openly bise,,,xual, and Pitt is reportedly also bi.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=374886

    Reply
  243. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:47 am

    @Mistory:
    I don’t understand. Is this an article written by Ian H. for some blog? If so, why wouldn’t he link it here?

    Reply
  244. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:50 am

    @P. Gold:
    That’s good advice, I won’t worry about jen’s marriage and whether it will last. I think there are far more important things to worry about that actually impact my life. This is all just for fun, isn’t it?

    Reply
  245. Tetta said on March 1st, 2013 at 11:28 am

    Of course J&J´s marriage will not last. As Plucky says, we are talking about Hollywood. But to me the main question is if they marry out of love or for any other reason. The reason I care is because I don´t want to be fooled. Deep inside I obviously have a romantic view of a wedding. To be honest I thought I had lost that feeling. But after looking at all the photos of J&J at the Oscar Gala were they look so happy and in love I want them to marry because of love. I don´t want them to marry to create a new brand or because Jennifer need to be “safe” if Brad and AJ split. I´m stupid, I know. Why do i care about two persons I don´t know and who live very far away from me. There are so many other, more important things to care about. And after reading the comments above I have another reason to not care. My intuition tells me some of the comments are not what we are supposed to believe they are. I don´t understand for what reason someone wants to confuse us. IUC reminds me more and more of FF. It seems like someone has a wish to support Brangelina as a couple. Of course that´s OK, but why hide the message in weird comments ? Threats or bribes ? I can´t put my finger exactly on what is wrong but there is a feeling of disharmony in the blog right now.

    Reply
  246. P. Gold said on March 1st, 2013 at 11:45 am

    @Tetta:
    Tetta, I’m very sure JustJen are very in love. They are famous but they are lovebirds who falls in love just like everyone when put together. What is there not to attract when 2 attractive people are together? Why would Jen marry him out of fear or security because of Brad and AJ? Nah, it’s too silly cos if they wanted to do all this, why wait for 8 years? I wouldnt worry about Jen taking Brad back cos he is really really yukky looking now and becoming a joke in the industry. I think Jolie can rest assured of that.
    By the way, I dont think we are being fooled. Jen and justin have both came out to say and admitted many things about their relationship. Why wont we listen to them? What have we got to lose? Nothing. If they fool us, they sure have a lot to lose in the long run. See what happens to the brand.

    Reply
  247. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 12:22 pm

    Personally I would prefer knowing what is occuring in the here and now rather than forecasts based upon an individuals personal opinion. Any relationship can break up if the stressors are strong enough but that is only a possiblity, and many variables can change the odds so….why worry about it before it’s a fact? Staying focused on the now would be more enlightening and entertaining imo. Does anyone know the exact wedding date? the location? wedding party? when they will move into their new mansion? will they go on an honeymoon? All these people who are “insiders” supposedly but only forecast future possibiilities know nothing imo or they’d be able to answer some of these questions. So, lets just let tomorrow take care of tomorrow, put away our crystal balls and enjoy what’s occuring now in current time. Watch the show!!! It’s going to be a good one I’d say. Any insiders got scoop on how Angie is reacting to Jennifer stealing her show? It’s not about Angie Voight any more, and dressing classy outshown the ugly chicken leg sticking out of Gone With The Wind black velvet drapes dress Angie wore last year…..all are facts that occured. So much more fun to discuss than, “What IF?”…..

    Reply
  248. Tetta said on March 1st, 2013 at 12:42 pm

    @P. Gold:Plucky, I hope you are right. I don´t fear Jennifer would take Brad back. And it´s a couple of years ago we heard that Jennifer needed to be in a steady relationship if and when BP and AJ split. It would be fun to know what was behind that statement. The way to handle the tweets disturb me in the same way as Patty Anne wrote. And Ian´s answer to Payal needs an explanation. ” It
    won´t last”. I want Ian to tell us why he answered Payal in this way. It doesn´t matter was Ian says but if he is a real journalist he has to explain what makes him answer the question in this way.And when Rushdog, who usually express her self in a clear way, suddenly says that Ian wanted to say “it wasn´t meant to last” I begin to wonder what is going on ?

    Perhaps I have learnt to much how an open blog works. There are dirty games going on behind the blog, people answer themselves using different monikers and make things up that are far from the truth. If I go to FF I´m prepared to all this. But IUC has been a fun and trustworthy blog for a long time and it´s first now it seems like some of the comments are written by others than the “real” persons behind the monikers. I hope I´m wrong because I have had a lot of fun at IUC together with all others who use to come here.

    Reply
  249. Tetta said on March 1st, 2013 at 12:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    It took me a long time write my comment above and I read your´s after I added my comment. To me “What if” isn´t the main problem. Everything might happen. Perhaps Jennifer gets cold feet and cancel the wedding :)
    I´m more interested in what´s going on in this blog. But as i said, I hope I´m wrong about all my negative feelings.

    Reply
  250. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    You said it better than I could. It is fun watching jen upstage angie but now we have to see what maleficent does to counter that because we know she will. I think sometimes we get a little too emotionally invested in all this (no criticism of anyone else here – I’m totally guilty of this myself). I choose to believe the relationship is real but I think jen can play the celebrity game with the best of them (I don’t fault her for this), except for brangie. They raised it to a whole new level until they got stupid and started to believe their own hype. I think we can agree that no one stays on top forever. A couple of years ago brangie was flying high, now they’re in the gutter. Maybe next year they’ll be golden again. All it takes is one hit movie to accomplish that. Today jen is flying high and maybe next year she’ll be a nobody. Whatever anybody’s opinion is, we should remember it is an opinion only as we really don’t know the true facts of any of their lives. Only the loons think they have that information.

    Reply
  251. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 1:10 pm

    @Tetta:
    Tetta, I hope I didn’t create a problem here when I questioned who Payal was. Something seemed off to me when she first started posting and I thought she was the other IUC poster who uses different monikers. I do think it’s the real payal now and so I feel I should apologize for starting that trouble.

    Reply
  252. Payal said on March 1st, 2013 at 1:17 pm

    @Guest2:
    No need to apologise.

    Reply
  253. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 1:58 pm

    Not intending to butt in, but you were not alone in your questioning. A lot of posters didn’t recognize payal as being Payal, and yes, we’ve had our share of people who make up new nicks to post just for sick kicks. That’s the problem with online chats, you only have the word of the person with whom you chat that they are as they present. All in all, it’s been basicly a good group here imo, only a few with secret agendas, not that many loons who drank the kool-aid, and a lot of fun, enlightening posters. The Internet has taken the world by storm since anyone can be online if they wish to, so the rules of etiquette are being created as the Internet evolves. It’s become much more social than originally presented, so we’re all able to chat about subjects that fit our individual interests, and make new Online Friends…..but never reveal personal information, phone number, address, etc. unless you know that person well. Any of us could be anything we wish to be online….take care.@Guest2:

    Reply
  254. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    How cool is this? It’s all there in plain English.

    http://truthquake.com/2012/04/19/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-engagement-stunt-failing-brand/

    Reply
  255. Tetta said on March 1st, 2013 at 2:42 pm

    @Guest2:

    Please, don´t worry ! Your comment about Payal has nothing to do with my comment. My thoughts about IUC and blogs in general are based on things that have been on the surface for at least a couple of months.

    Reply
  256. Guest1 said on March 1st, 2013 at 2:53 pm

    Some interesting tidbits from CDAN, maybe Ian can elaborate on the stories:

    This was posted not too long ago:

    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2013/03/when-being-pap-gets-you-killed.html

    This blind item was posted earlier today:

    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2013/03/blind-item-2.html

    Reply
  257. Up the Coast said on March 1st, 2013 at 2:57 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Nice! I guess we don’t have to waste our time here anymore ;)

    Reply
  258. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 2:59 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    @Guest2:
    The moving van pics were taken by x17 on Feb 21 and posted on isopix. Someone on FF saw the pics on isopix and started a thread about it. As G2 said, I also wonder why no bloggers picked it up.
    Brad did do some shifting of houses into different trusts shortly before the end of 2012. Here’s one example
    http://losangeles.blockshopper.com/property/5587012013/5756_valley_oak/

    Reply
  259. Up the Coast said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:02 pm

    Soooo….Obama says he’s not a dictator…hmm. Remember when Nixon said he wasn’t a crook? That was right before he was impeached :lol:

    Reply
  260. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol: I’ll still come here but maybe not as much. I’ll wait until jen marries first and a brangie breakup is announced. It’s quite possible they won’t announce one though unless one of them wants to take another relationship public. That will be a difficult announcement for them to make without getting a lot of tongues wagging and the tabs poking around for info. There’s no way anyone will respect their privacy and they probably know that.

    Reply
  261. Up the Coast said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:15 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    There are lots of other sites around that speak english ;)

    Reply
  262. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:23 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Cynthia Pett is brad’s manager. So the house was in the mondo trust then changed to another tust with cynthia pett as the trustee and now it’s back to the mondo trust. When I googled richard malkar, trustee of the mondo trust, it comes up that he is brad’s top security guard. When they bought the house supposedly they bought it together.

    http://losangeles.blockshopper.com/news/story/2400056405-Brad_Pitt_Angelina_Jolie_drop_1_1M_in_Griffth_Park

    Reply
  263. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Perhaps but some stuff, even if in English, is really not worth reading.

    Reply
  264. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:26 pm

    Back to the woman holding the baby in the original pic. Lots of suggestions here from everyone. I’m still unsure who this one is about, too much conflicting info. Just because someone denies it doesn’t mean it isn’t so.
    Ian could have used any pic of a woman holding a baby but this specific pic indicates someone was too busy with a baby leading up to the Oscars to watch any Oscar movies. Or maybe he just used it to tie it in with the Oscars.

    Has JA adopted? Would she be able to hide the baby when in Cabo or did she get the baby since Cabo? Is that why she has an extra big trailer on her current movie, because a nanny is hanging with a baby? Or is she pregnant and that’s why the wedding is planned for shortly?

    Has AJ adopted (either on her own or with BP again?). Or is there a possibility she’s pregnant? (If she’s pregnant, is she holding the news so she can overshadow the JA/JTx wedding?)
    Jan 28 – besties posts on FF, jolie is really pregnant and it is not pitts jolie people want pitt to say he is the father
    Feb 3 – story pops up about Brange family, incl Jon V, learning Mandarin in prep for adopting a child from China
    Feb 6 – I can’t get out of my head the tweet on Feb 6 that AJ was seen in Seattle. The tweeter seems valid (not like the bookstore one). Was she in Seattle because of something to do with an adoption or was she there for plastic surgery?
    Feb 11 – Jon V interviewed at pre-Grammy party;
    Oh, and as for those rumors that Angelina is adopting a child from China and is forcing the family to learn Mandarin in anticipation of it’s arrival are totally false.
    “I don’t think so, I know the first part is wrong,” Voight tells us, effectively shutting down the rumors that Brad and Angie are adopting again.

    Reply
  265. Dream said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:31 pm

    dont see where anyone has posted this so here ya go.
    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2013/03/when-being-pap-gets-you-killed.html

    Reply
  266. Up the Coast said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:34 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Maybe the picture is Lara/Bambi? That would throw a wrench in the works.

    Reply
  267. Up the Coast said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:37 pm

    @Dream:
    The DM had this story….that’s the second pap in as many months. But this one, supposedly, had a picture of Bradlee in a compromising position with another woman :shock: Was it Bambi? dun-dun-dun-DUN!

    Reply
  268. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    @Guest2:
    Yes it was recently shifted from Briarcliff to Mondo. It’s not known if she is actually part of Mondo Bongo trust, I don’t believe she is, JMO.
    He also shifted 5750
    http://losangeles.blockshopper.com/property/5587013035/5750_valley_oak/

    Reply
  269. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    @Guest2:
    Malchar also has an IMDB page but the only thing listed is when he worked as brad’s assistant on the movie Fight Club. He purchased most of this property pre-angelina according to this article:

    http://www.bergproperties.com/blog/despite-tabloid-rumors-of-him-selling-all-of-his-us-properties-brad-pitt-very-quietly-paid-129m-recently-to-buy-a-1534-square-foot-house-in-los-angeles-los-feliz-area-that-is-adjacent-to-his/

    Back later.

    Reply
  270. Up the Coast said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:42 pm

    @Dream:
    A year ago, today, Andrew Breitbart died….or should I say, he was murdered. http://www.breitbart.com/

    Reply
  271. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:47 pm

    @Mistory:
    So this is an article Ian wrote or was interviewed for or what? And why does it say “recent” engagement announcement when it was almost a year ago.

    Reply
  272. Dream said on March 1st, 2013 at 3:54 pm

    @WR:
    i have always thought if the goings on at the vatican were a book it would be one interesting read.

    Reply
  273. Guest1 said on March 1st, 2013 at 4:39 pm

    @Dream:
    I posted the link earlier with the following blind item from the same site which was posted earlier today, before the story abou the pap. Her is the blind item:

    It is not so much that this keeps saying he is getting married A++ list mostly movie actor buys pot. I think most of us would be shocked if he didn’t smoke pot. After seeing some of the things he has done, lately, I certainly hope he was on pot. The very very interesting thing is that when our A++ lister has gone to buy pot from his dispensary, he has had, for the last two or three times with him a barely out of her teens blonde and they are all over each other.

    My earlier post disappeared . . .

    Reply
  274. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 5:13 pm

    sounds as if someone is spilling the beans on Bradleeeeee Pittiful. @Guest1:

    Reply
  275. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 5:14 pm

    Remember the tweeted photo on Ian’s twitter account of a plate of eggs, bacon and the comment too much grease? What struck me was…..the eggs were used. The bacon had too much grease to be used. The embrios?@iwasanon:

    Reply
  276. rushdog said on March 1st, 2013 at 5:35 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Didn’t the Seattle tweet say she was there scouting for the new movie she will be directing? And also said she didn’t look pregnant? I can’t remember exactly but I agree the tweeter sounded valid. So someone who is supposedly hounded whenever she leaves the house and there’s only a tweet about her being in Seattle? Lol.

    Reply
  277. rushdog said on March 1st, 2013 at 5:37 pm

    @Mistory:
    @iwasanon:

    It’s taken from this post on April 16, 2012:

    http://ianundercover.com/2012/04/16/iuc-world-exclusive-brangies-desperate-attempt-to-avoid-going-bust/#comments

    Reply
  278. rushdog said on March 1st, 2013 at 5:46 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    @Patty Anne:
    Now who would spill the beans on Bradders to keep what they’ve got!!

    Interesting thought on the used eggs and embryos (prissy and pink!!) regarding that tweet. Threatening to leak information was in at least one of the riddles from pre-jeweler announcement. Again, spilling of the beans…

    Does the tweet title “too much bacon grease” make sense with that interpretation? I’ve got to think on that a bit.

    Reply
  279. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 5:53 pm

    @Dream:
    I think it would be a blockbuster. Maybe one day the butler will write a book (if he doesn’t bumped off first!).

    Reply
  280. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:04 pm

    @Guest1:
    interesting comments with the guesses over there at cdan, most of of which were Pitt

    Reply
  281. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:08 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    @rushdog:
    good thinking PA, I hadn’t thought of that. I also have to think a little about how it ties in.

    Reply
  282. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:12 pm

    @rushdog:
    No the tweet guy just saw her. It was a loon who came up with that as a reason for being there (because they couldn’t think of anything else since Pitt wasn’t with her)

    Reply
  283. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:13 pm

    @rushdog:
    oh, ok thx

    Reply
  284. Dream said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:15 pm

    @Guest1:
    i saw that one too. but its not too much of a shock if it is pitt. they say they do not have a monogamous relationship.
    i am not sure why u have a relationship if its not for monogamy. o well to each their own.

    Reply
  285. Dream said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:18 pm

    @Guest2:
    i think a lot of people have been and will be again before the church lets all that info out.
    just knowing what all is in the library would be so interesting to know about.

    Reply
  286. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:18 pm

    http://hahasforhoohas.com/ I love how Ian finds these adorable and witty sites. My daughter and I had a laugh over the entry on Feb 25th that was attached to the photo he posted above, which also has the tag- and the winner is! lol Definitely how many young moms think it is going to be . chuckling. We could have all told them that!

    It was founded, by Anna and Jen! Two funny women, a what a great idea! It is a fun read. My ddd is in love with this site. I think I would have been too if I had been introduced to it at her age. All we had was, “Kids say the darndest things!” :) How fun! Thumbs up IAN! Love it! That and the one on the salt , so far , my two favs!

    Now, a question? I do not use Facebook, not professionally or for pleasure. I also do not use twitter. However I do read twitter all the time. I follow a few things with twitter, faith based organizations, news organizations, some social commentary, Ian, politics. Are people having a problem accessing Ian’s twitter? I am wondering because just from reading it sounds as though only a few here can see it? Anyone should be able to click on any twitter account unless it is private, (his is not) and read all entries. Looking at that last entry, my first thought was, what is Chelsea doing with Michael Jackson? j/k. lol. Okay so guessing that is suppose to be Jennifer taking a cue from Angelina, not directly but in some indirect way. Did she really take a cue, or did she one up her? :) checkmate! She looked fabulous.

    Hope all are well. We are slowly getting there. I believe.

    Reply
  287. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:23 pm

    @Payal:
    HI Payal, hope you are doing well! Hope you land a terrific job! You will do great!

    Reply
  288. Payal said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:26 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi! So happy you’re back here after a long time! Thanks I’m looking for a job but its just too hard to find one argh!

    Any opinions kate on the latest especially Ian’s tweets?

    Reply
  289. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:33 pm

    OK, I finally got around to looking at the tweet pic. Here’s my interpretation or first impression (I can’t stop laughing)
    The blond in the red (JA) is dj’ing and running her show. At the same time she’s looking over at the dark haired woman (AJ) who is staring at what looks like a baggie that is holding something, possibly a body part. So I think this is saying AJ cut off BP’s balls and JA, while she’s running her own show is looking over at AJ thinking “What did you do?”
    Can we add these captions to the pic Ian?

    Reply
  290. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:45 pm

    Exactly. The game being played by Angie and Brad has always been one of competition. In fact Angie said that in an intervew or three before. I can’t imagine a relationship lasting when both parties are constantly trying to one up the other in all things, but there you have it.

    As for how I understand the “too much bacon grease” I see it as a reason why the eggs were used. The bacon was not of any use as it had too much grease ( was bad).@rushdog:

    Reply
  291. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 6:59 pm

    http://truthquake.com/2012/04/19/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-engagement-stunt-failing-brand/
    I’d never heard of that blog, truthquake, before , so this was a find. Might be worth keeping up with . I didn’t know Ian wrote for this one, just Celebuzz that he told us about being a regular contributor. @rushdog:

    Reply
  292. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 7:24 pm

    @Payal:

    You will find something. Take your time, find something that is great fit for you. You will spend more time at work than you do with those you love. :) The fit is much more important than the money.

    I think she looked fabulous on the red carpet and at the Oscars, they both did well, it was orchestrated beautifully. She shined, they shined. Plans were made ahead, she went a little off script at one point , but otherwise, it was amazing! Loved the red dress! Will it last? It will for as long as they want it to.

    I felt sorry for Anne, see how fast things can turn. As fast as one can be put on a pedestal, they can be pushed right back off, and she was the one up for the award. Harsh reality. I thought Anne was lovely also, and had no reason to apologize. Her mother had played the same part , it was an emotional connection for her. Not terribly hard to understand. Nice to see Anderson stand up for her.

    In the end, she has to be happy, with herself.

    Reply
  293. Guest1 said on March 1st, 2013 at 7:26 pm

    @Kate:
    Let me give you some advise, from experience, don’t open an account with Facebook! In my opinion, Facebook is good for teenagers (monitored) and others who have time to go on it daily, and who don’t mind reading every detail of some Facebook users lives.

    But I will recommend, especially for Payal, a Linkedin account. It is a professional site where you can build a network. My husband is a recruiter, and he pays extra in order to see others profiles on Linkedin. I think he searches certain phrases and is able to look at the profiles of other professionals and contact them to see if they are interested in a position he needs to fill. He does not use any of the sites that posts resumes. I think that is passe’. Hopefully Linkedin is active where Payal lives.

    Payal, I’m sorry for my rude comment the other day. Like others, I was not sure if it was you and hated the fact that someone might be using your username. But as soon as you posted about your nephews picture being on your Facebook site, and other details, I knew it was you. I am glad you are back posting again! Maybe you should use your Facebook picture as the avatar on this site, then we will know it is the real Payal.

    Reply
  294. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 7:42 pm

    @Guest1:
    Hi G1, no that is not for me, I have never been interested in that sort of networking. :) Just about everyone I know though has a FB account and they do not understand why I do not. 1- I do not have time, 2- I believe it is too of a personal risk to put your private information online in that way. Yes I agree though, Linkedin is a terrific site for professionals . :) Great advice!!

    Reply
  295. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 7:47 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Is he, it looks as though they are referencing this site.. I have read Truthquake before. They basically do a rehash of articles. So what are the odds that Jennifer Lawrence had a accident (lost half her dress at the SAGs) and another one (tripped ) at the Oscars? Certainly gets your attention doesn’t it. lol. It amazes me some of the things they use these days.

    Reply
  296. Siska said on March 1st, 2013 at 7:58 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    Ha ha,,love your Tswift style..it’s very strange for me that for years Brad keep the marriage of the table by using same sex marriage stuff,and now after Jen found the right man,they suddenly engaged but still not get married yet. I mean if you already had 6 kids and in relation and your kids want you to get married,why keep dangling that away..just do it quietly already.
    I always suspect all of them us this triangle to feed media frenzy for their own pr..anyway,.its their image and pr exposure that keep them to still get the job in very competitive market.

    Reply
  297. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 8:02 pm

    @Guest2:
    That is a great reflection.

    Reply
  298. Siska said on March 1st, 2013 at 8:14 pm

    @Guest2:I am with you,I am doubting very much that Jen and justin is fake,they seem very in love and lots of their friends actually witness it
    The only real Jen serious relation after brad was Vince,John and Justin.
    Why she have to fake it? She is human being like us,so it’s natural if she wanted to be in relation.
    Do Jen and justin will last? We hope so,but who knows?

    Reply
  299. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 8:15 pm

    @Siska:
    Hi Siska, it would be nice if they were already married, wouldn’t it, if that is really what they want? Children that age are so full of questions once they have access to the right information. That is added pressure. Regardless of what the state of their union is, I believe they both do care very much the state of the emotional well being of the kids. Add that to what their advisers are telling them is best for their bottom line, wow, imagine the stress. Not a good place to be. Once they make a decision and do it either way, maybe it will get easier for all of them, and grace will find them and their lives will begin to heal. One can hope, and one can pray. :) going on to many years here , to do otherwise.

    Reply
  300. haki said on March 1st, 2013 at 8:24 pm

    Just got the PEOPLE magazine. JustJen coverage is short and sweet.

    It says: “From taking in a cuddly puppy by the name of Sophie to flashing a huge engagement ring, life has never been sweeter for the sweetest of superstars.”

    Reply
  301. Patty Anne said on March 1st, 2013 at 8:34 pm

    LOL, yes, I thought the same thing at the Oscars when she “tripped” going up to the stage. A bit too much of a coincidence I thought, but quite an attention getter, especially when Hugh Jackman rushes the steps to help her. I guess actors are never “off duty”.

    I’d never heard of that blog , Truthquake, so I was surprised to find an article from Ian there. Especially as it coincided with his riddle here of the same time frame. Made me wonder if he’s writing stories in easy to understand wordage on other sites. It would make it simpler for many of us who struggle with his riddles without direction from him or an assistant wouldn’t it? I especially liked that he wrote about a story that was happening now and not giving clues to what may or may not happen in the future. Anyway, I prefer that format actually. Do you know any other blogs he writes for other than Truthquake and Celebuzz? He does know how to tell a story.@Kate:

    Reply
  302. haki said on March 1st, 2013 at 8:47 pm

    Hi Kate!

    I had to come back even if for briefly!

    Reply
  303. iwasanon said on March 1st, 2013 at 8:59 pm

    @Kate:
    I don’t believe for a second that they care about their emotional well being. She’s a psycho and has no clue what that means and he’s high most of the time. They bought, er adopted, and birthed those kids for the sole purpose of deflection and image improvement. Oh and dragging them around the world and exposing them to the dog and pony shows detracts from emotional stability, it doesn’t add to it. There should be no stress, children should always trump their bottom line. Of course then they may not have enough money to pay for all those nannies :) . All JMO.

    Reply
  304. Payal said on March 1st, 2013 at 9:13 pm

    @Guest1:
    No worries, yeh I think I need to put an avatar up, I will soon. Maybe of my dog Cody.

    Kate what do you mean plans were made but she went of script? Care to elaborate?

    Reply
  305. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 9:36 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate, I hope all is well with you. Thanks for finding that Hoohas site, it made me laugh. Regarding your comment about Ian’s twitter, I think most of us can read the tweets but many of us are not connected to twitter (I’m not and never will be) so we can’t really communicate with him. I’m glad that he answers Rush’s and Payal’s questions but I noticed he only answers one question, no follow ups, lol. It would be nice if he answered questions on the blog once in a while. Also, I second Payal’s question about Jen and the RC script.

    Reply
  306. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 9:50 pm

    I thought article fell short. The last time People interviewed Jennifer she answered questions. It was an exclusive. This has a tabloid feel to it. They had to use a witness that saw Justin bringing her a salad, quoting unnamed sources when it is in regard to her wedding details, a fellow party guest( no name) on her and Justin at the party and using words like “seems” or “likely” , and borrowed old quotes. They did manage to sneak in there that a baby is not that important anymore, if they have one, good, if not, that is fine. Sounds like surrogacy and adoption is not a consideration. ( I am making light of this because this is a piece of junk), they did include the name of the girl who happen to witness Justin bringing her a salad. (see how important that is , so important they listed the ingredients. lol) ..People needs to get back to human interest stories.

    When they interviews Kelly Clarkston, on Feb 6th, also noted, she has the ring, the guy, the date and the dres (except she actually discussed all of those details, in detail), stamped across the front of the magazine was – Exclusive. This on, Jen, was a fluff piece.

    I am not saying it was not approved by her team, and that, the info , saying she is getting married, iis not true, but just that it had absolutely nothing in it that was solid, where as her past interviews with People , did. This is just hype. This is the same kind of pieces we got on Brange when they wanted things out there, without being quoted. That is why this magazine is called “kneepads” and why People is also considered a tabloid. I remember when Jennifer hated both US and People and wanted nothing to do with either of them. Times change though, and they have to be used to their advantage, but curious that she didn’t just give them a interview and instead of allowing them to put their own spin on it. It would have been a bit more respectful.

    Here is the thing about Jennifer Aniston being in love. The universe is invested. This reminds me of that “reporter” who compared Angelina of , was it Mother Mary, a Saint, in Vanity Fair , and ended up with egg all over his face. Remember that, very very cheesy. Sorry, I really hate this kind of thing,it reeks of dishonesty.

    Reply
  307. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 9:53 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I don’t think he wrote that, it looks like they only referenced it ,but I don’t know.(he doesn’t have a byline in that does he, I didn’t see one?) That is sort of the format for them . They take stories that are already out there and expand on them, like Huffington and Gawker does, there is very little they write. I think in the beginning they did some, and got into a bit of trouble, I have forgotten the details on that site.

    Reply
  308. Up the Coast said on March 1st, 2013 at 9:54 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate…I’m happy to hear life is getting back to normal…that’s good news.

    Reply
  309. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 9:56 pm

    @haki:
    It is so nice to see you Haki, I don’t even remember why you decided to take a break . I have not been around much either. I have a child that was injured and has had a very hard time making it back, slowly is, but it is still a very long way back for him. Prayers are helping. :) Hope you have been well! Jen looked beautiful didn’t she!

    Reply
  310. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:10 pm

    @iwasanon:

    lol well, that is what makes this so interesting, and I love to read your insights Iwas, I am one of those who likes to believe, and maybe this is a bit naive of me, that parents love and adore their chidren, and while I know of course I know that is not true of all parents, I do believe that the one common bond between them, is that, the love of the kids, and that is why they are still where they are. If there were no kids, they would have been over a long time ago. Granted they have made choices that may not have been the best for them, but all parents make mistakes. The nannies, and the traveling does not bother me, because many home school their kids, and many take their kids on the road when they are under the age 12. The pony show, yes,I agree that is hard, but, they are show biz kids and Angelina was raised exactly like that . Her mom did that to her from a very young age, it is what she knows. I can think of many other stars who have done much worse. I am not trying to whitewash them, but I don’t think it is easy either. They I believe have enormous emotional handicaps, and I would not ever want to be in their place with six kids. We can only hope that God blesses the kids and they all become better people in spite of their struggles. :) I am sure their parents have strong feelings on this, and know much better than I . So hard for me to really comment on this. They are just little kids. I use to get upset about Shiloh and the who boys underwear, but no more, people do the best they can I think. Now if we find out there is some kind of drug abuse with the kids, or mental or physical, that is all together different, I then will be right there with you!

    Reply
  311. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:16 pm

    @Guest2:
    oh I see, okay so you can read them. I understand. Yes it would be nice if Ian would come on to the blog and answer peoples questions , he did use to do that. I suspect it is just quick and easy to use the twitter, and it takes a bit more time to wade through here. Why don’t you email him. Ian answers his email normally. I have been so tied up with my child I have not really been bothering him, which I m sure he greatly appreciates :) because I was never gentle about it as many of you may be.

    Reply
  312. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:18 pm

    @Payal:

    Nothing really. Ian is the expert.

    Reply
  313. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:20 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Thank you, almost, there was another thing on top of that thing, but over all, we are getting through it. :) It is going to be a long while before I can feel good about it, but I feel like it is going to be positive in the end. No one has told me that, just going on faith. :)

    Reply
  314. Kate said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:21 pm

    @Guest2:
    oh btw that site is the one the photo Ian used up top is from…that is why I posted it.. that photo is from the day of the Oscars..did you read that entry that day??

    Reply
  315. Guest2 said on March 1st, 2013 at 10:35 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes, I knew that but I never searched for the site. Still not sure what it means other than maybe someone’s going to become a mother. Time will tell I guess.

    Reply
  316. Pauly P said on March 2nd, 2013 at 12:29 am

    The brunette in the pic looks like Lindsay Lohan to me….oh God…is she being adopted????? :)
    Might be referring to her legal troubles…

    Reply
  317. haki said on March 2nd, 2013 at 1:56 am

    @Kate

    Dear Kate, your child is in my thoughts and prayers. May God assist you and keep your family in his loving care.

    Reply
  318. WR said on March 2nd, 2013 at 4:02 am

    @Dream:
    My compter acted crazy. Testing!

    Reply
  319. Louisianagurl said on March 2nd, 2013 at 4:10 am

    From the same website as the pic…the title leading to the pic is “And the award goes to…”

    Here are my thoughts…When I saw the gold ring reference (both couples have “gold rings in play at the moment), I kept thinking about a brass ring. It almost seems like we are comparing JPs and JA/JT’s happiness and success…Who does the award go to? In my opinion it goes to JA/JT. I think the pic shows a tired looking woman who is too busy to do something either for herself or pleasurable…AJ. At least in the press, the contest amongst the triangle still rages. I also think that if you think about what the press defines what each might be reaching for as their “brass ring”…BP has always wanted the Oscar and JA has always wanted to be happy with a man and a baby…NOT my opinion, this is what I am saying the press has defined for them.

    I do however think that in reality JA has won the award in just being happy in general where the JPs look miserable. I for one believe that if AJ/BP are not already married, they might as well be and if they ever separate the process would be as complicated. I think BP got what he thought he wanted and ended up unhappy, or at least unfulfilled. I think that JA got what she thought she didn’t want in the divorce and her tragic miscarriage and she ended up stronger and happier in the long run (in no way am I saying that her miscarriage was a good thing or belittling the experience). I think she is in a position to create a family with children if she chooses, but that is up to her and I don’t think she feels like she has to have a child or a man to feel completed or fulfilled.

    Bacon and eggs compliment each other, but you know what they say about too much of a good thing (Bacon Grease in this case…something unhealthy ruining what could be a healthy choice)…Again I think this points to AJ/BP’s situation and that they do compliment each other in their bad choices which have led to their perceived unhappiness which is unfortunate and I hope for the sake of the children will turn around for them quickly. I don’t really care for either of them, but do not wish ill will on either of them and hope that they can have their happy ever after too whether that is together or apart.

    Lastly, I have to say that I do like JT with JA…I think they compliment each other well…JMHO… :-)

    Reply
  320. WR said on March 2nd, 2013 at 4:13 am

    Yes, Dream, it would be quite the page-turner were some daring writer to tell what he learned. I personally am true to my church, regardless.
    Lots of speculation in our “informal” talking circle. The group is made up of different beliefs. One is a former catholic, and he feels strongly that a now cardinal his family knew up in Northern California is a strong candidate. He feels the cardinal has similar accomplishments to that of Benedict XVI. We’ll see if he’s right!

    There was a lot of liberal experimentation in the ’70s. Does anyone remember the dancers in the aisles during mass? The substitutes for wine? Lately, we have almost no congregation singing; just a few bars as the priest approaches the altar, and then the same after he leaves at the end.

    If anyone’s interested, there are several popes who are getting close to canonization: John XXIII; Paul VI; John Paul I and John Paul II.

    Reply
  321. WR said on March 2nd, 2013 at 4:15 am

    @WR:
    I meant different “believers”.

    Reply
  322. Tetta said on March 2nd, 2013 at 7:56 am

    @Louisianagurl:

    Your interpretation gets a thumb up and a goldstar !

    Reply
  323. Dream said on March 2nd, 2013 at 11:52 am

    @WR:

    sorry wr i didnt meant to cast aspersions on the church. the office of pope has always been a hotbed for intrique as any high ranking office is. its an old office and i am sure what has leaked out over the yrs is only the tip of the iceburg.

    Reply
  324. Siska said on March 2nd, 2013 at 7:07 pm

    @Kate:
    Very good comment Kate! You always very rational and smart..and more fair in your observation,

    Reply
  325. Kateo said on March 2nd, 2013 at 7:35 pm

    @haki:
    Thank you Haki, we are believing :) I have a question, I read back, why does everyone think Ian is pointing to a fake relationship? I don’t see that anywhere.

    Reply
  326. Kateo said on March 2nd, 2013 at 7:43 pm

    No@Siska:
    I have never been one to hold on to grudges, and I forgive very easily. It has been 9 years since this all started, and and 8 since they seperated. People serve less prison time on far more serious crimes. I genuinely hope all be one stable and happy..It is what is in the best interest to the kids, and all of them. Of course the tabs will have to find someone else to co us on, but they would eventuallty anyway. Let’s believe personal well being is more important to all than fame. :)

    Reply
  327. Dream said on March 2nd, 2013 at 8:14 pm

    i meant to ask before but i keep forgetting. did anyone else find it funny they used leg gate to advertize the oscars this year. every commercial i saw first picture was a pic of jolie leg.

    Reply
  328. Guest2 said on March 2nd, 2013 at 9:39 pm

    For anyone interested in what’s going on at the Vatican, this article is definitely worth reading.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2287074/Gay-sex-rings-The-Filth-corrupting-Vatican–Pope-REALLY-quit.html

    Reply
  329. Siska said on March 2nd, 2013 at 11:41 pm

    @Dream:maybe that’s why she kept out from Oscar this year.

    Reply
  330. Guest2 said on March 3rd, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    Did anyone see that photo of aj at a charity event for the Congo that she supposedly attended without brad? It was posted at FF.

    Reply
  331. Guest2 said on March 3rd, 2013 at 6:51 pm

    @Guest2:
    This is the thread at FF with the aj photo.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=375391

    Reply
  332. Dream said on March 3rd, 2013 at 7:39 pm

    @Guest2:
    ty i dont go there much.
    @Siska:
    its possible she knew in advance that that would be in the commercials. i read the ratings were up this yr. i wonder if it was people tuning in to see someone else do something embarrassing?

    Reply
  333. fluffy said on March 3rd, 2013 at 7:57 pm

    Dream

    Maybe everyone wanted to see a better leg than that skinny thing we saw last year!!

    Reply
  334. Dream said on March 3rd, 2013 at 7:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    cute bunny btw lol we have a sweet boy like that.

    Reply
  335. Dream said on March 3rd, 2013 at 8:00 pm

    @fluffy:
    :lol:

    Reply
  336. Guest2 said on March 3rd, 2013 at 8:11 pm

    @Dream:
    It was kind of boring last year except for the leg so maybe we should thank jolie and that writer guy for the entertainment. The funniest thing I’ve ever seen was when he got up there and made fun of her. I couldn’t believe he actually had the b*lls to do it. There were a lot of good movies this year so that could have something to do with it.

    Reply
  337. Guest2 said on March 3rd, 2013 at 8:13 pm

    @Dream:
    Thanks, he was cute but I didn’t like all the pink so I’ll keep looking for a nice spring avi.

    Reply
  338. Dream said on March 3rd, 2013 at 8:43 pm

    @Guest2:
    lol i think the worst thing was the dress. in another dress it probably would ahve looked dramatic bu the dress she was wearing looked like upholstered cardboard. it sort of shifted weirdly every time she moved.
    if she had a sense of humor she would have just laughed along with everyone. everyone has an embarrassing moment in their lives.
    i need to change clothes too my avi still wearing her christmas dress.

    Reply
  339. Guest2 said on March 3rd, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    @Dream:
    You’re far more gracious than I am when it comes to aj. The dress was awful but if she had just gracefully shown a little leg and not had her head held up so high up in the air that she looked haughty she would have been okay. The impression I got was that she was trying way too hard to look sexy and ended up just looking foolish. I think it must have been very difficult for her to be ridiculed when she’s always been held up as a sex symbol. Brad sure knows how to beat down his women.

    Reply
  340. Siska said on March 4th, 2013 at 3:04 am

    @Dream:rating what’s up because of the different target market that come when Seth m host the Oscar. He has a lot of fans from family guy series and ted the movie.

    Reply
  341. Dream said on March 4th, 2013 at 1:35 pm

    @Siska:
    ahh ty i dont usually watch. so no idea whats going on lol.

    Reply
  342. haki said on March 4th, 2013 at 8:02 pm

    Ladies, I just saw a picture of AJ on FF taken at a recent Malibu event to benefit Africa. She looks ill. I am not a fan of hers, but I really felt bad seeing that picture. I hope she is ok. Her children still need their mommy!

    Reply
  343. fluffy said on March 4th, 2013 at 8:35 pm

    Welcome Back Haki!

    I miss you XXX

    I agree with you on the photo! AJ does not look well at all and there are many posts at FF that say the same.

    Reply
  344. Guest2 said on March 4th, 2013 at 9:45 pm

    If you’re talking about these pictures I don’t think she looks sick but I do think she maybe looks a little pregnant. I suppose it could be the way she’s standing. That hand sure is scary looking.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=376371&sid=c7be7488e9282458e7dcdeff57e1981b

    Reply
  345. haki said on March 4th, 2013 at 10:11 pm

    Hi fluffy!:)

    @ Guest2 No, not picture! But yes, she seems a little fuller in the middle. Who knows! Time will tell!!

    Reply
  346. haki said on March 4th, 2013 at 10:22 pm

    All I know is that my husband, who never follows anyone in the popular culture, saw her picture (where she was presenting someone with an award last month) and commented that Angelina Jolie looks bad and that something is wrong with her (He is a physician).

    Reply
  347. WCKitty said on March 4th, 2013 at 10:51 pm

    @Guest2:
    @haki:
    I think that she looks very thin, especially in the photo of her arm that is being held by her hand. She has been thin for awhile, but since I’m not a doctor I’m not going to say anymore. In the last photo, it looks like she is wearing a black shirt under the black sweater. Maybe the lower shirt is making her look fuller in the middle when it is not stretched down? She just looks too thin to be carrying a child.

    Reply
  348. Guest2 said on March 5th, 2013 at 8:20 am

    @WCKitty:
    I agree she does look too thin to be carrying a child but she also looked thin when she carried the twins (I know some think she didn’t carry them). I just considered it a possibility based on the “clue” above and the way she looked in the photo but who really knows what she’s got. Time will tell I guess.

    Reply
  349. Dream said on March 5th, 2013 at 2:51 pm

    @Mistory:
    ring has migrated to left hand and middle finger. is this a signal theya re gonna marry soon? lol may not be same ring actually but it made me laugh.

    Reply
  350. guest 3 said on March 5th, 2013 at 5:06 pm

    Again, it’s about the JP’s, not JA. I almost fell over over my chair when a poster talk about JA suffering 2 miscarriages. It’s so funny, JA has never talked about suffering a miscarriage. Unlike, Bette Midler, Mariah Carey, Kirstie Alley, Courteney Cox, Beyonce, Nicole Kidman, Lilly Allen ( 5 months). JA actually joked about being pregnant on a SNL skit and a commercial. But of course. JA can joke about pregnancy and suffer a miscarriage. However, these women talk about how it affected their lives to lose their babies. JA was never pregnant, because she doesn’t want a baby. She likes her lifestyle, Mexico, tanning, drinking, hanging out with friends. There’s nothing wrong with it, but own it. What are you people going to do if she’s still saying the same thing at 50 years old?? It’s not too far off. Stop worrying about the Jp’s. Their kids will soon be teens. 2013…Maddox 12, Pax 10, Zahara 8, Shiloh 7, Twins 5. 1 teen, and a tween next year. I’m exhausted and feel old. I can’t believe how time flies. Z was a 7 month old baby and Maddox was 3 1/2 years old when B/A hooked up. Another Year, JA is single and childless.

    Reply
  351. haki said on March 5th, 2013 at 5:14 pm

    @ guest 3

    Did you EVER stop to think that may be, just may be, Jennifer Aniston doesn’t want to have children?
    WHY DOES ANYONE NEED TO TO HAVE CHILDREN TO BE HAPPY???????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    Reply
  352. haki said on March 5th, 2013 at 5:37 pm

    @ guest 3

    AND how do you know that she didn’t have any miscarriages?? Were you in there with Brad and Jen?

    Reply
  353. Guest2 said on March 5th, 2013 at 5:41 pm

    I think g3 did a copy and paste of an old post. She/he/it is getting lazy. The post is just as boring now as it was then. It’s interesting how the loons are going bananas with the wedding news. You’d think they’d be happy the triangle is finally being put to rest. I guess they are just obsessed with aniston’s life and can’t stop talking about her. So sad, really.

    Reply
  354. Simms said on March 5th, 2013 at 5:57 pm

    A body weight of more than 15 percent Under ideal weight is too thin. When bones are clearly visible thru
    Skin, ribs collarbone your prob. Too thin. Chronic bad breath,menstrual Irregularities, lack of period and
    Hair loss(her forehead looks more huge than before) I think she over excercises and eats very little She prob.
    Thinks shes fat. This woman needs help asap. None of the mainstream press ever mentions how bad she looks.

    Reply
  355. haki said on March 5th, 2013 at 7:03 pm

    I am calm now:)

    Reply
  356. WCKitty said on March 5th, 2013 at 7:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    So true. Let’s not forget, another year, six children, and Angie and Brad are both still single. Why? Jen had to wait how long for Brad to ask her and walk down the aisle to marry her. What are they waiting for? My husband has laughed and said that Brad will marry her “when *ell freezes over!” I’d be embarrassed if I were Angie.

    Reply
  357. Guest2 said on March 5th, 2013 at 8:18 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I think she is embarrassed. Brad sure looked happy without her in France. Isn’t it funny how he’s dressing like justin now with the skinny jeans? He still looks like a slob though.

    Reply
  358. WCKitty said on March 5th, 2013 at 8:26 pm

    @Guest2:
    He looks like he has gained quite a bit of weight and shouldn’t be wearing skinny jeans. I’ve never thought he was attractive, but he never looked like a smelly-dirty slob until he hooked-up with Angie.

    Reply
  359. Guest2 said on March 5th, 2013 at 8:36 pm

    Did anyone see these photos of brangie at cannes in 2009? Look at the pic of her sitting there, it’s hysterical, who sits like that?? What a freak.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=376880

    Reply
  360. WCKitty said on March 5th, 2013 at 8:50 pm

    @Guest2:
    Oh my!!! No, I have never seen that photo before. I thought nothing could top the over-the-top royalty act of her stealing the spotlight away from the other actors who deserved the attention and the display she and Brad put on the staircase. IMO she was a mess the entire day and night at the after-party.

    Reply
  361. Guest2 said on March 5th, 2013 at 9:11 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Brad looks embarrassed sitting next to her, as he should. They sure do bring out the worst in each other, don’t they? It’s been quiet here, where did everyone go?

    Reply
  362. iwasanon said on March 5th, 2013 at 9:17 pm

    @Guest2:
    Quite a pic. I saw all the pics out at that time and many were not flattering to her but I never saw this one. Seems like it was just released.
    Did a certain someone buy up that pic before and is now letting it out?

    Reply
  363. Guest1 said on March 5th, 2013 at 9:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    I was thinking the same exact thing and I only skimmed this her/his post! Again, she/he is posting about JA.

    Reply
  364. Capri said on March 5th, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Now that is a thought that no one else has thought of.. I was at FF and no one had seen that pic before and as far as I know, no one thought of that. It has long been speculated that Brad bought up all unflattering pics in the past. But none of us had remembered that until you. Good memory!

    Reply
  365. Guest1 said on March 5th, 2013 at 10:11 pm

    Ross Mathews guest hosted on Chelsea Lately last night. From the schedule on the shows website, it looks like she will not be on at all this week. I know they tape in advance. But I did see a promo on Bravo that she is on ‘Watch What Happens Live’ tonight, which is taped live from a studio in New York City. Maybe it is a coincidence she is in the city this week, maybe not!

    Reply
  366. Guest2 said on March 5th, 2013 at 10:12 pm

    @iwasanon:
    It never occurred to that it might be just released though I wondered why I never saw it before. It wasn’t very nice of a certain someone to release such an awful picture. Maybe it’s a warning that there are worse to come out if she doesn’t play nice.

    Reply
  367. Guest2 said on March 5th, 2013 at 10:24 pm

    @Guest1:
    Interesting. Justin was photographed with his brother (how cute is he?) in NYC and a man who is possibly his father. We’ll know soon enough if it’s going to be this weekend. I can’t imagine she could work right up until the weekend of the wedding but maybe the wedding planner did all the work.

    Reply
  368. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on March 6th, 2013 at 2:13 am

    @Guest2:

    A lot of women and men work while planning a wedding. Most of them do the work themselves, without a wedding planner being involved. In fact, a lot of women and their fiance’s work up until the day before their wedding. I don’t know many couples that can take months off of work, before a wedding. I don’t see why Jennifer can’t end her film on Friday and be married on the weekend. That way she and Justin have time for a Honeymoon until she starts filming her next movie, and he starts directing his movie in the summer…..

    Reply
  369. Guest2 said on March 6th, 2013 at 7:49 am

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    You’re right, of course. I’m not quite so organized and would need more time to prepare, lol.

    Reply
  370. Mistory said on March 6th, 2013 at 8:08 am

    @Guest2:
    His brother looks super hot !!!

    Reply
  371. WCKitty said on March 6th, 2013 at 12:05 pm

    @Deanne (formerly known as whatever):
    @Guest2:
    Both my husband and I worked the day before our wedding. So where can I find a picture of Justin’s brother?

    Reply
  372. Guest2 said on March 6th, 2013 at 12:20 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Geesh, I ust eb the only pre-wedding slug here!!! Sebastien Theroux seems to be everywhere but try this….

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=264102&start=32640

    Reply
  373. Guest2 said on March 6th, 2013 at 12:21 pm

    @Guest2:
    must be……

    Reply
  374. WCKitty said on March 6th, 2013 at 12:51 pm

    @Guest2:
    Wow!!! He is good looking! :) Thanks!
    I would have taken the day off if I could have. We were both young and couldn’t afford to take the time off both before and after.

    Did you see this thread?
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=202486

    Reply
  375. WCKitty said on March 6th, 2013 at 12:53 pm

    @WCKitty:
    We took time off after the wedding.

    Reply
  376. WCKitty said on March 6th, 2013 at 1:04 pm

    @Mistory:
    Thanks! :)

    Reply
  377. Mistory said on March 6th, 2013 at 1:32 pm

    @WCKitty:

    ^_^

    Reply
  378. haki said on March 6th, 2013 at 3:01 pm

    Sebastien Theroux (spelled the French way) graduated from University of Virginia with a degree in English literature. He is a writer..Somebody (may be his future sister-in-law Jennifer) help him land a project or an acting role fast!:)) He is very handsome!

    Reply
  379. Guest2 said on March 6th, 2013 at 3:15 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I saw that. Great comment. There seem to be a lot of old threads of aj/bp popping up at FF from 2008 and especially 2009. I wonder who is resurrecting them and why.

    Reply
  380. Guest2 said on March 6th, 2013 at 3:15 pm

    @Mistory:
    Have you ever seen anything like that? It’s bizzare.

    Reply
  381. WCKitty said on March 6th, 2013 at 3:26 pm

    @Guest2:
    Good question, especially since that awful picture of her sitting with her bare legs exposed in Cannes has just surfaced. It is starting to look like someone is attempting to take her down.

    Reply
  382. Guest2 said on March 6th, 2013 at 3:52 pm

    One more post and then I’ve got to get back to work. Funny comments here:

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=377349

    Reply
  383. rushdog said on March 6th, 2013 at 4:40 pm

    @iwasanon:
    You really have to wonder about that. I believe someone on the thread said the pic was always with the rest of the photos but just missed. They are so good at FF about finding this stuff that I find it hard to believe that photo would have been missed. That set of pictures has to be the worst set I’ve seen of her. The theater pic is awful. I have to believe that FF would have been resurrected that pic at the time of leggate had it been out there.

    Reply
  384. rushdog said on March 6th, 2013 at 4:43 pm

    FWIW – lainey’s take on the wine – “educate me…is it a new wine if all you do is change the name….used to be called Pink Floyd…”

    http://www.laineygossip.com/Brad-Pitt-and-Angelina-Jolie-launch-rose-wine-Miraval/25967

    Reply
  385. WCKitty said on March 6th, 2013 at 5:46 pm

    @rushdog:
    I very rarely post over at FF, but I do lurk there a lot. I don’t know if you were lurking there during the Cannes event, but I was and there were a lot of pictures. Most of those photos were quite memorial, such as the sweaty after-party pics, and the royal stairway event. :roll: However, this photo would, and has, topped most of them, so there is no way that any FF posters would have missed it.

    Reply
  386. siska said on March 6th, 2013 at 6:34 pm

    @haki:OOmg!, im like you,gushing over how hot that sebastian theroux was…he..he,..he seem really want to be like his brother..so cute.

    Reply
  387. siska said on March 6th, 2013 at 6:36 pm

    @rushdog:
    They have big international fame,their fans will support them by buying the wine which only cost $15.
    Thats why I dont think they will ever split. The brand is beneficial for their pocket.

    Reply
  388. Mistory said on March 6th, 2013 at 10:37 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … aG2blxz0bI

    WTF is he doing ????

    Brad sitt Edwin Ad LOL

    Reply
  389. Siska said on March 7th, 2013 at 4:20 am

    @Mistory:this is new? A bit funny concept,cause the jeans not showing much.

    Reply
  390. Guest2 said on March 7th, 2013 at 8:39 am

    @Mistory:
    This is what brad said about his marriage to jen in the parade interview: “I started to get sick of myself sitting on a couch, holding a joint, hiding out”. It appears he’s found another way to entertain himself on the couch.

    Reply
  391. Mistory said on March 7th, 2013 at 1:00 pm

    @Guest2:
    He is such a loser

    Desperate for $$$$

    Reply
  392. haki said on March 7th, 2013 at 1:06 pm

    @ Guest2

    I still find it most ironic that one of the most interesting of the Theroux’s (Justin) found Jennifer interesting enough to marry her and to want to spend the rest of his life with her!!:))
    What does Brad have to say about that?!

    Reply
  393. Guest2 said on March 7th, 2013 at 3:10 pm

    @haki:
    My opinion on that interview he gave was that he was a little “sour grapes” that jen had moved on and found a hot new boyfriend. He didn’t like that she wasn’t pining away for him (or the perception that she wasn’t). Not a brad fan here.

    Reply
  394. Guest2 said on March 7th, 2013 at 3:10 pm

    @Guest2:
    perception that she was.

    Reply
  395. Guest2 said on March 7th, 2013 at 3:11 pm

    @Mistory:
    Well, she hasn’t worked much so I guess he has to make up for the lost income.

    Reply
  396. Guest2 said on March 7th, 2013 at 3:13 pm

    Okay, where the heck are UTC, Patty, Tetta, where have you gone, girls? Come back, please.

    Reply
  397. haki said on March 7th, 2013 at 4:06 pm

    @Guest2

    I hope I didn’t scare them away. I know I am posting too much!:))

    Reply
  398. Guest2 said on March 7th, 2013 at 4:08 pm

    @haki:
    I doubt it’s you, lol. Maybe it’s me!

    Reply
  399. haki said on March 7th, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    LOL!:))

    Reply
  400. WCKitty said on March 7th, 2013 at 4:37 pm

    @haki:
    @Guest2:
    I hope it’s not me! Then again, maybe they are having fun doing their taxes? (sarcasm)

    Reply
  401. rushdog said on March 7th, 2013 at 9:33 pm

    Lol, I think Damon in these pics looks like Bradders in his younger days! JMO!!

    http://theclicker.today.com/_news/2013/03/07/17223942-matt-damon-and-michael-douglas-pile-on-glitz-for-liberace-film?lite

    Reply
  402. WR said on March 8th, 2013 at 5:18 am

    Well, it’s the third month of 2013, and nothing has been said about Brad Pitt’s announcement of his retirement from acting, which was to happen in 2014. Well, as they say, when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. Was so hoping! But I knew his word is not reliable. Oh well, at least he gave some of us hope that we’d not see him again. Again, at the age of 50; maybe the media will give us someone younger and more appealing. Same with his better half.

    Reply
  403. WR said on March 8th, 2013 at 5:23 am

    Was skimming over ENTY’s blinds. Skippin’ most of them. The one with BP as the main suspect sounds suspiciously loaded to build his rep as an alleged womanizer. There’s another similar, in tone, about another celeb, who has had many rumors about his same-sex trysts despite his marriage and fatherhood.
    Deflection artists? A new game in town?
    JMO!

    Reply
  404. Mistory said on March 8th, 2013 at 8:14 am

    100% a PR stunt for brangelina sell out wine within five hours !!

    Reply
  405. rushdog said on March 8th, 2013 at 3:38 pm

    This is great! Geo & Stacey –

    http://www.dlisted.com/

    Reply
  406. Guest2 said on March 8th, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    @rushdog:
    That’s hilarious. She didn’t look too happy to be with him at the last awards shows (oscars?) so not surprising. I actually liked her better than his other beards.

    Reply
  407. WCKitty said on March 8th, 2013 at 4:48 pm

    @rushdog:
    @Guest2:
    That was funny! :) IMO, I’m not sure about them being beards for him, but at least he is honest about not planning on ever marrying again. There were rumors that she was the one that would make him break that promise, but she turned out to just be one more of his short-term relationships. Maybe he is gay or bi, but he could also just get bored of them or just dump them when they (and/or he) is getting too comfortable in the relationship. I sure liked her more than that Elisabetta before her, ugghh!

    Reply
  408. Siska said on March 8th, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    @Mistory:
    I have to disagree with you,the wine is cheap specially with combination of public fascination of celebrity ,it’s gonna be sell out.
    Whether we like or not,brangelina is a famous brand,and they have their big fans to support them.
    And the wine already being reviewed as a good decent wine also.

    Reply
  409. Siska said on March 8th, 2013 at 5:05 pm

    @Guest2:
    I have my soap opera radar on also…so I’m with your theory..he,,he.

    Reply
  410. Guest2 said on March 8th, 2013 at 5:57 pm

    So brad’s in Paris shopping for furniture with a decorating coach. Can he possibley have figured out he’s got bad taste? Is he spiffing up the chateau for a wedding or staging it for a sale? Can’t imagine he would sell it when he just launched a new wine.

    Reply
  411. Siska said on March 9th, 2013 at 5:01 am

    Jen had fun with her friends on the vanity fair party photo booth.
    Very cute

    Reply
  412. Mistory said on March 9th, 2013 at 8:02 am

    @Siska:
    I like the photo of VF

    Reply
  413. Siska said on March 9th, 2013 at 4:51 pm

    @Guest2:As long the image is one of criteria to be successful in HW,he and the rest of like him will continue allegedly beard game.mmm imagining if they make movie starred Bradley C,Leo,James F,clooney,Joseph Levitt. It will be epic.
    I’m also prefer this girl than his previous one,Elizabeth C.

    Reply
  414. Siska said on March 9th, 2013 at 4:51 pm

    @Siska:
    Plus jake g.

    Reply
  415. Siska said on March 9th, 2013 at 4:55 pm

    And Tom c@Siska:

    Reply
  416. Guest2 said on March 9th, 2013 at 9:16 pm

    Can anyone explain why pitt is doing the pap stroll solo for two days in a row in Paris with a sh*t eating grin on his face? Weird.

    Reply
  417. Guest1 said on March 9th, 2013 at 9:40 pm

    @Guest2:
    Because he is 5661 miles away from Los Angeles . . .

    Reply
  418. Guest2 said on March 9th, 2013 at 10:42 pm

    @Guest1:
    Is he flaunting his freedom in Paris while she’s stuck in LA with the kids knowing how she hates being in LA and would probably rather be anywhere else?

    Reply
  419. rushdog said on March 9th, 2013 at 11:34 pm

    Ian’s tweeted a pic of an empty white (looks like leather) arm chair. BP may have designed a chair like this or it may represents his Paris furniture shopping.

    Reply
  420. rushdog said on March 9th, 2013 at 11:41 pm

    The bp designed chair looks a bit different but the same type of chair ( sorry i can’t post it right now).

    Reply
  421. iwasanon said on March 10th, 2013 at 12:26 am

    The Empty Chair is a crime novel by Jeffery Deaver. It is the third novel in a series featuring Lincoln Rhyme; the first of which was made into a movie, The Bone Collector.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Empty_Chair

    The Bone Collector starred AJ.
    Not sure how it applies here because I’ve never seen The Bone Collector so I’ll have to read up on it.

    Reply
  422. Deanne (formerly known as whatever) said on March 10th, 2013 at 1:20 am

    So Brad is now decorating the Chateau, all by himself. Isn’t this something a couple would do together, furnishing their home? Where the heck is Angelina in all of this? So then Ian has a picture of one “lonely” chair on his twitter account. Could it mean that is the only furniture Brad needs is a chair for one person?
    Second of all, she is not in France with him at all, even though her name is supposedly attached to that wine….. He’s been there for what? Over a week? He didn’t do any interviews or promotion of that wine. Perrin family did. Why? Do they realize that Pitts name attached to anything now a days equals instant and utter disaster?

    Reply
  423. Guest2 said on March 10th, 2013 at 1:56 am

    This is the chair brad designed. Maybe his trip has to do with the furniture collection and not the wine but he wanted to give the appearance of being there for the wine launch. Isn’t it odd that he’s never been photographed by the paps at or near the chateau even when he makes highly visible trips to France? Does he ever stay there?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/architecture-design-blog/2012/nov/09/brad-pitt-furniture-design

    Reply
  424. rushdog said on March 10th, 2013 at 8:57 am

    @iwasanon:
    The plots are about murder and seem a bit complicated to be a part of this. Hope that’s the case. I tweeted Ian a few days ago and asked if the bs break was done or still going to happen. Maybe this tweet was in response to my tweet even though it wasn’t a direct response. The chair is empty says alone, no one is there to me.

    The empty chair is also how Clint Eastwood’s RNC speech is referred. He pretended to have a conversation with the Pres but there was no one there. I think the tweet my be meant to re-enforce that despite the pr drippings the togetherness is a pretend and he’s alone, only in need of one chair.

    Here’s something interesting about the bone collector – was directed by phillip noyce who directed salt. TBC was published in 1997 and the movie came out in 1999. The empty chair was published in 2001.

    Reply
  425. WCKitty said on March 10th, 2013 at 1:02 pm

    @Guest2:
    That bed looks like a jazzed-up version of a hospital bed! What ugly uncomfortable looking furniture. He’s pushing his kids to become architects? :roll:

    Reply
  426. Mistory said on March 10th, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=379125

    Mad help his daddy to promote WWZ by wearing t shirt

    Reply
  427. siska said on March 10th, 2013 at 4:47 pm

    @Mistory:this family is a brand. So they not shy to use their kids for pr.
    I really hope some of their naive fans can see this and admit that they not so above all the self promotion like kim k and the like.
    Their whole family is the brand.

    Reply
  428. liv4 said on March 10th, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    Chair pic reminded me of a rehab center.

    Reply
  429. Kate said on March 10th, 2013 at 6:19 pm

    @liv4:
    Hi Liv, I don’t really have any idea what the chair means. I remember that when Brad debuted his furniture line he did the interview with AD, and the photo was taken inside the wine cellar at Miravel. I remember thinking that was a good marketing concept for his wine. They had tried to promote the same one they just sold at Cannes before under the old name, although just through restaurants I believe,, and their mouthpiece , the jeweler , also promoted in a backdoor way. The last comment , after they explained how the designer, forgotten his name, just happened.to find Brads sketchbook, was that they were going to have a very…long partnership..he was sure. I remember that bc the Chanel ad had just come out , and natuarally one would have to wonder how it was going to affect everything else. There were many bad reviews of that furniture, and the one very visible ,and that was really credible was by Barry Goralnick. He sat in it and posted it on his blog, but he only said it was comfortable. He liked the dining table though. Is Brad still in a partnership with his “designer ” , or did he dump him after the bad reviews? He actually believed they were going to mass produce that chair in plastic for all, well I don’t know who. The one in the photo looks nicer than his. Why rehab? Can.you explain?

    Reply
  430. Kate said on March 10th, 2013 at 6:35 pm

    LLP @Mistory:
    I notiiced Will has his son out there. The boys are adorable. Theyook so.mature. I don’t think I have seen Maddox in year. Such a little teenager!

    Reply
  431. Kate said on March 10th, 2013 at 9:05 pm

    @Louisianagurl:
    I listened “Band of Gold”,.and read through the son facts because it sounded as tthough the bride and groom never consumated the marriage. There are some interviews with Freda where talks about this song. She was not comfortable singing it initially..There us some division on whether the groom could not , but tried, so they slept in seperate rooms, or he was gay, so she sent him away, to sleep in another room. Either way it seems to point to a wedding that never comes to pass. I don’t know how Ian is applying that really, but I am in lined to think he is comparing the show at this Oscars to last Oscars to the one in 2009 and is saying, this is the same thing, but that is just a guess and how it looks to me. In 09 if anyone remembers it was, the handlers were going to dissolve it all, flush it all, new plan , and that was the last of JM, and the circle continues. Allegedly. That is what it looks n means , at lest I think, and considering his comment, it won’t last, that makes sense . How a white chair goes with any of it I have no idea, other than it is white, and it is empty.

    Reply
  432. liv4 said on March 10th, 2013 at 9:42 pm

    @Kate:
    Just looks like an empty chair in a corner in a sterile environment – like counseling. Just first thought that came to my mind.

    Reply
  433. fgdf said on March 10th, 2013 at 10:12 pm

    Divorce agency the acknowledged dissolution of marriage. Abatement is usually one of the a lot of alarming adventures in a person’s life. Apart from getting demanding and painful, a abatement proceeding may aswell prove to be an acutely cher affair. Very often, humans traveling through a abatement do not accept acceptable assets to appoint an big-ticket lawyer. Abounding attorneys in the US specialize in abatement and annulment. Money plays a basic role in the alternative of a acceptable abatement lawyer. For abounding people, an affordable abatement advocate is one who accuse the atomic bulk to represent them in their abatement case.

    When a brace decides to get a divorce, anniversary accomplice suffers a budgetary set back. They accept to administer two families instead of one. Children ache the a lot of in these situations. Several organizations are actively complex in accouterment affordable casework to humans who seek a abatement and added accompanying issues such as adolescent aegis and visitations. These organizations accept to accession funds from charities, clandestine donors and the government.

    Many abatement attorneys allegation basal fees if apery humans acceptance to middle-income and low-income groups. A archetypal abatement advocate can allegation up to $200 an hour. A simple abatement case may blot ten or added hours of a lawyer’s time, amounting to $2000 or added per case. A lot of abatement cases are usually complicated and absorb several added accompanying affairs and abounding added hours.Nike Free Run outlet cheap

    An alone gluttonous the casework of an affordable abatement advocate may attending to the Internet for a account of lawyers, their contour and fees. There are abounding abatement attorneys who are complex in accepted practice. However, it is appropriate to attending for a advocate who is an able in abatement and aegis cases, back this about reduces the cost.

    Many humans are clumsy to pay for these acknowledged services. A lot of states in the US accept acknowledged aid casework that action discounted acknowledged services. They aswell action chargeless casework to humans who are butterfingers of hiring a advocate to appeal their case.

    Reply
  434. Kate said on March 10th, 2013 at 10:16 pm

    @liv4:
    Oh good point, yes it does. I wonder if someone is under therapy.

    Reply
  435. Mistory said on March 11th, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    http://blindgossip.com/?p=51337

    The Sun Is Setting On This Relationship
    [Blind Gossip] We’ve talked several times about how this very famous couple was assembled in a publicist’s office. We may have also mentioned that the relationship would end after the DVD was released. Well, the break up is coming, and we have more precise information for you on the timing!

    It will definitely happen before the end of August 2013.

    Why August? Well, when the contract was originally written several years ago, the exact dates of the film’s release and the DVD release were not known. While they approximated that the entire promotional campaign would be finished by the end of Spring 2013, the production company padded in three additional months to the “personal relationship” contract just to be sure. The contract ends in August of 2013.

    The film and DVD are already out, and the promotion is essentially done, so the break up (which will be very amicable) will happen any time between now and August with the consent of both parties.

    Will you see still them together from now until the breakup? Yes, but rarely. The genuine friendship that the actor and actress once shared peaked a long time ago – and has been going downhill over the past few months – so they are now spending as little time together as humanly possible. They are done.

    Who do you think ???????

    Reply
  436. WR said on March 11th, 2013 at 4:51 pm

    @Mistory:
    Just askin’: what dvd? what movie? promotional campaign? This blind is vague! It could be a lot of couples, seems to me. It’s a business arrangement. And it doesn’t go deep enough to hint strongly about the identitiy of the couple. I, for one, couldn’t build up any interest, based on what Blind Gossip is giving us. But then, I’m not good at this sort of thing!

    Reply
  437. Mistory said on March 11th, 2013 at 5:07 pm

    @WR:
    I thinking of theses couple
    Brangelina
    Will smith and Jeda
    Catherine seta jones and Michel

    Reply
  438. Guest2 said on March 11th, 2013 at 5:09 pm

    @Mistory:
    The Twilight kids, Robert Pattinson and Kristin Stewart.

    Reply
  439. Mistory said on March 11th, 2013 at 5:26 pm

    @Guest2:
    Bingo

    Reply
  440. WR said on March 11th, 2013 at 6:19 pm

    Should you be at the supermarket, and happen to see the newest issue of the National EXAMINER, (with tv evangelists/John Travolta, et al, on the cover) check out page 53 at the back of the tab to see a pic of Zahara, 8, looking rather unhappy.

    Reply
  441. Pauly P said on March 12th, 2013 at 11:38 am

    Pics of James McAvoy on celebitchy…looks just like Knox…just saying

    http://www.celebitchy.com/285384/james_mcavoy_i_am_a_nerd_but_i_dont_dive_head-first_into_a_fiefdom_of_nerdiness/……

    Reply
  442. Chip said on March 12th, 2013 at 11:38 am

    Hello! How is everybody?
    I read something on FF, that intrigued me…
    “I remember reading last summer that Brad’s attorneys have made sure that only Brad has paid for renovations of Chateau Miraval, that he owns all of it himself.” Did any of you know anything about that?

    Reply
  443. Chip said on March 12th, 2013 at 11:50 am

    And i read another story in Vanity Fair, about a moving company “that has relocated celebrity clients including Angelina Jolie, Shirley MacLaine….” etc, and that in recent years..Has anyone read it?

    Reply
  444. jen said on March 12th, 2013 at 1:21 pm

    @Chip:
    here

    http://www.bohomoth.com/?p=18309

    Reply
  445. Guest2 said on March 12th, 2013 at 2:10 pm

    @Pauly P:
    I’ve noticed that, too. It’s eerie how the son looks like mcavoy and the daughter looks like miller (jonny lee).

    Reply
  446. Dream said on March 12th, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    @Mistory:
    i think the sun setting was the operative clue in that blind. sounds like k stew and r patt to me too.

    Reply
  447. Jaded said on March 13th, 2013 at 11:31 am

    @Chip:

    Yet the wine is produced by Jolie-Pitt and Perrin.

    Reply
  448. Guest2 said on March 13th, 2013 at 2:28 pm

    Totally OT (if there is topic) and not to take away from the fine rose of the illustrious vintners, brangelina, but they’ve elected a new pope. UTC, if you’re lurking take a look of this pic of Benedict – he looks demonic and what is that emblem on his right shoulder? I’ve never seen him look like this except in this one photo. If the elected pope is named Peter then we’ll know the malachy prophesies are coming true.

    http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=who+is+the+new+pope+2013&id=8368A378C40EAC0DBC2E995338FA9D67764EE8B3&FORM=IQFRBA#view=detail&id=8368A378C40EAC0DBC2E995338FA9D67764EE8B3&selectedIndex=0

    Reply
  449. Dream said on March 13th, 2013 at 2:45 pm

    what do we think of the rumor going around that jen is already married? interesting if she is lol now she can just throw a huge reception.

    Reply
  450. Guest2 said on March 13th, 2013 at 3:36 pm

    @Guest2:
    UTC, where are you??? The new pope is Francis I and he has a nice face.

    Reply
  451. Guest2 said on March 13th, 2013 at 3:38 pm

    @Dream:
    I don’t know what to think of that. It could be true. I was reading somewhere that Blake Lively and Ryan (?) actually got a license four days after their wedding and were legally married quietly on the 5th day. It’s one way to keep things quiet.

    Reply
  452. Guest2 said on March 13th, 2013 at 5:08 pm

    @Jaded:
    I read somewhere that jolie actually did the stomping of the grapes and she did such a good job that pitt decided her name should be on the wine. I think it was the right thing to do considering brad wouldn’t lower himself to get into the vat.

    Reply
  453. Simms said on March 13th, 2013 at 5:31 pm

    Does anyone remember where JFK Jr. Got married? I think it was somewhere in georgia some secluded
    Spot no one knew until a day latter. I say maybe jennjust get married there . My picks for her. Marriage
    Location: lColorado, California or IdK somewhere warm.

    Reply
  454. guest 3 said on March 13th, 2013 at 5:57 pm

    @ Guest 2
    Isn’t eerie How Katy Perry and Zooey Deschanel look alike and Javier Badem (Spain) and Jeffrey Dean Morgan (American) does as well? Knox looks like James McEvoy? you must need to see a optometrist quickly; if you were going with an actor that Knox resembles it would be Michael Pitt. But of course you wouldn’t do that since he has no connection whatsoever to Angie. Viv looks just like Brad as a baby. She’s growing up to be just as stunning as her sisters. Who think of these things? It sounds likes a science fiction movie. I guess the mind can imagine all kinds of things.

    Reply
  455. rushdog said on March 13th, 2013 at 6:35 pm

    @Simms:
    Cumberland Island, Ga. very secluded, church didn’t have electricity.

    Reply
  456. Guest2 said on March 13th, 2013 at 7:14 pm

    @guest 3:
    I can’t believe I actually agree with you about those four celebrities looking alike, especially the men though I think Jeffrey Dean Morgan is better looking than Bardem. I actually have good eyesight and I do think knox looks like james mcavoy (maybe your glasses need to be cleaned?) but I think he also bears a resemblance to brad and jane pitt. I also think viv looks remarkably like jonny lee miller but I also see a slight resemblance to brad. I do believe brad is the father of both children but I do find it a little strange that they look so much like two of jolie’s former costars.

    Reply
  457. Up the Coast said on March 13th, 2013 at 11:17 pm

    @Guest2:
    @Guest2:
    yikes! He really is scary looking, even when he smiles. I agree with you, the new Pope has a kinder/gentler face. (Maybe Malachy us full of malarkey ;) )

    Reply
  458. Guest2 said on March 14th, 2013 at 8:07 am

    Nice to “see” you again. Maybe it is a bunch of malarkey after all. Of course, the real anti-christ could be working behind the scenes. I was reading that in the last conclave Bergoglio (sp?) actually came in second in the voting and then took himself out of the running to make way for ratzinger to become pope.

    Reply
  459. Chip said on March 14th, 2013 at 10:15 am

    @Jaded:
    Yes, i know that, is written on the bottle, but is there any truth in this statement? Is he the only one who paid for restauration of the chateau? They live in his house in Los Feliz, i read somewhere that he owns the house they stay in New Orleans,(once a year), and now the chateau… Does she has any properties?

    Reply
  460. Dream said on March 27th, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2013/03/blind-item-2_27.html

    posted without comment. lmao

    Reply
  461. サマンサタバサ 財布 said on July 23rd, 2013 at 11:58 pm

    I am actually grateful to the owner of this web site who has shared this wonderful piece of writing at at this place.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

February 2013
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  

Meta