IUC World Exclusive: Boobie Trap Game…French Mistress Paintbox!!!!

Posted on May 23rd, 2012 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive, IUC:Sex

Hayneedle sandbox…flying to the moon hacked…boobie trap game…french mistress paintbox…stolen valor act…gone and never coming back…uncle kracker smile…donning and doffing…jango fett…jon voight illuminati…brotherly love…sealing the abyss gate…Hassan whiteside…knife throw sound…kids hideout…child welfare league of america!!!!!lovetolove

  1. Dream said on May 23rd, 2012 at 10:36 pm

    thank you Ian. much appreciated. that last place was getting long.

    Reply
  2. WR said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:21 pm

    Hassan Niam Whiteside (born, June 13, 1989, in Gastonia, North Carolina) is an American professional basketball player for the Sacramento Kings.

    Reply
  3. WR said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:26 pm

    Jango Fett is a minifigure, based on the Star Wars bounty hunter of the same name. Jango Fett was known as one of the best bounty hunters in the galaxy.

    Reply
  4. WR said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:31 pm

    Re: the John Voight clue, maybe this will help:

    Http:/www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message430779/pg1

    There’s a discussion about JV, and incest.

    Reply
  5. Quiet1 said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:32 pm

    Thank you Ian….intriguing! Jango Fett is a bounty hunter…kids hideout…
    This is gonna take some thinking :S

    Reply
  6. Pauly P said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:34 pm

    Picture is titled Love to Love..with the Twitter pics that have been recently coming up..is this the person she is having the affair with?

    Reply
  7. Pauly P said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:39 pm

    Booby trap game is not spelled boobies..could it mean boob trap game…she has trapped someone else in her web as she did bp…

    Reply
  8. WR said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:40 pm

    Re: Sealing tghe abyss gate; a couple sources:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olb9CqpUbv8

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXsJ163VTlY

    Reply
  9. Quiet1 said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    Uncle Kracker’s Smile is a really up beat happy song. Not description of BP/AJ in any recent pics I’ve seen. Has to be the other 3rd party making someone smile.

    Reply
  10. Pauly P said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:51 pm

    French Mistress Paintbox.A rather bemused look at the title — a ‘French Mistress’ in painting refers to a portable easel and paintbox combination that is easy to pack and unpack. This could refer to her nomadism..this is a review of a book “The French Mistress”..interesting but alot of reviews on this book could apply to AJ:
    My opinion on the “sweet and perfect” issue — I noticed this more as the novel continued, but Louise really isn’t the most objective observer of her own life. It’s a sympathetic portrait to be sure, and she’s so charming that it can make readers want to excuse her faults, but they’re definitely there if you look for them!

    Reply
  11. WR said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:56 pm

    I hope I get this right about
    Images for UJncle Kracker Smile:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=uncle+kracker+smile&hl=en&qscrl=1&nord=k&rtz=1T4lRF

    If not, I’ll re-check, and fix it. (the last 1/3rd)

    Reply
  12. WR said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:57 pm

    Now, I’ll leave it to you experts.

    Reply
  13. Pauly P said on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    Donning and doffing…a legal term:According to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which was established in 1938 to establish workers’ rights, the term “donning and doffing” is used to refer to the practice of putting on (donning) and taking off (doffing) protective gear, clothing and uniforms. There are certain circumstances where employers are legally required to pay their employees for time spent donning and doffing.

    Could this mean they have reached a monetary amount for all the years they have been donning and doffing…she is the employee and now it’s over???? Interesting…

    Reply
  14. Pauly P said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:15 am

    Knife throwing sound..Thought that might be the irreparable damage of last year…but there are a million references to her with knives, throwing knives, etc…she threw a knife at bp in mams..found this interesting link on all the guns they used on the movie…with the gun trafficking on the zombies movie, this is interesting

    http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Mr._&_Mrs._Smith

    This is an aside since we have a new clue and we have enough to talk about, but he was quoted in Cannes as saying Killing Me Softly had to be very violent…most of the last few movies have been very violent and required alot of weapons….wonder if that’s his way of getting weapons easily accessible and transportable..by making violent movies that require weapons that he can bring into foreign countries..something fishy there

    Reply
  15. Pauly P said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:21 am

    Child Welfare League of America: Mission Statement from their website

    Mission
    CWLA leads and engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth and families.
    Vision
    Our vision is that every child will grow up in a safe, loving, and stable family.
    Focus
    Our focus is children and youth who may have experienced abuse, neglect, family disruption, or a range of other factors that jeopardize their safety, permanence, or well-being. CWLA also focuses on the families, caregivers, and the communities that care for and support these children.

    Is this saying the kids are being neglected..definitely family disruption..have they been called in?????

    Reply
  16. Peri said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:23 am

    Hayneedle sandbox… http://www.hayneedle.com/kids/sandboxes_174762_4295026332
    About Hayneedle (lots of charity) (There’s also “Our Story”, Exec info and more at this link.) http://www.hayneedleinc.com/whatsNews.html

    Reply
  17. WR said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:27 am

    @Pauly P:
    They make the media look so ridiculous!
    Where is his fiancee, or the person to whom he gave that promise ring? Do not people soooo in love accompany their s/o to public events???????? Then why isn’t PEOPLE on top of this?
    I skim over D-listed because they happen to be the best update source I know. Had a lol moment when I saw their CAPTION CONTEST winning entry. It had to do with Brangelina.

    Reply
  18. Pauly P said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:28 am

    The Stolen Valor Act of 2005, signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 20, 2006,[1] is a U.S. law that broadens the provisions of previous U.S. law addressing the unauthorized wear, manufacture, or sale of any military decorations and medals. It makes it a federal misdemeanor to falsely represent oneself as having received any U.S. military decoration or medal. If convicted, defendants may be imprisoned for up to six months, unless the decoration lied about is the Medal of Honor, in which case imprisonment could be up to one year.

    This could be referring to all the BS they have made up about themselves…this isn’t a literal reference….they have made themselves look like heroes and it is all lies….they will be punished for their crime, so to speak

    Reply
  19. liv4 said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:29 am

    Does caption on pic say it all with reference to her once saying that if she didn’t have her films for an outlet for all sides of her she would probably be locked up?

    Reply
  20. Peri said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:30 am

    One of the things Hayneedle does is donate to Childhelp, nonprofit org for treatment and prevention of child abuse.

    Interestingly, Kathie Lee Gifford is a spokeperson for Hayneedle to promote “peaceful, positive parenting”.

    (Just curious, but did we ever decide who the talk show hostess was that doesn’t like JA but won’t publicly admit it?)

    Reply
  21. Pauly P said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:32 am

    @WR:

    That fake engagement/proposal bs has shut the media up since Friday April 13th…that’s almost 6 weeks…instead of reporting other things about them, they are reporting fake weddingdates, etc…that was a deflection of something else and it worked cause we didn’t hear about anything else…

    Reply
  22. liv4 said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:32 am

    I think the last two references in the puzzle with kids hideout and welfare agency are suggesting the kids are in a safe place.

    Reply
  23. Peri said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:40 am

    (Read somewhere that BP and AJ were actually in a helicopter readying for takeoff to Cannes, she gets out at last moment, refusing to go. Then I read he’s at Cannes, offering the excuse that she’s readying for a movie she’s to begin very soon. … As if. When would AJ ever give up the chance to vamp up the red carpet for a night? Image is everything, you know.)

    Reply
  24. Pauly P said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:41 am

    Sealing the Abyss gate: Video game reference

    One thing not mentioned in this video is that you must be in a team in order to use the abyss gate. However your teammates do not have to be there with you.

    Maybe this is part of the agreement…carry on ruse they are engaged but not doing carpets anymore…must be in a team but doesn’t have to be with you

    Reply
  25. liv4 said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:05 am

    The JV illuminati and brotherly love refer to incest. Are there images or video on the computer that was hacked, threatening to be leaked?

    Reply
  26. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:42 am

    Child Welfare was called in after it was brought to the attention of the authorities when someone hacked into a computer of there’s and there was evidence of INCEST or child pornography, and its going on in that household??? So they flew off to London, to get away before a thorough investigation came into light? Ok. I don’t even want to think about this……………….Or is one of those children’s biological father a product of INCEST between either Jolie and James or Jolie and her father?? Or was James or John fiddling with those kids? OR did one of those kids speak out to someone??

    Reply
  27. WR said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:57 am

    @Peri:
    The answer to the blind was almost unanimous in fingering Barbara Walters.
    I always get the impression that BW seems as if she’s in her own world, so to speak. Also, appears to be in power game-playing. Jmo!

    Reply
  28. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 2:49 am

    Hmm, sort of sounds like someone has packed up, left..and they are on the run with all the cherished goods. Did Brad hire GB to go find them? Ha ha!

    Reply
  29. Mez said on May 24th, 2012 at 5:01 am

    If you click on the picture and it goes to the otherside the title is “Love to Love”. This may be another clue maybe James is a father.

    Reply
  30. Peri said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:08 am

    @WR:
    I think she’s senile these days. I used to enjoy watching her interviews when I was younger, but anymore, I can barely stand her.

    Reply
  31. janindisguise said on May 24th, 2012 at 7:51 am

    She and her bro are products of an illuminati home where incest is prevalent and/or sort of a given. This is what I’ve read about.

    About the kids, I’ll just pray for them for I cannot bear to think about that topic.

    Someone’s uncle involved? Uncle Kracker – someone from the country area? Voigt family – just from the K in the word Kracker. Voight’s ancestors are heavily German, hence the letter K. Just off the top of my head there.

    Again, I’ll say: Delta – knives, weapons, ad nauseum.

    Reply
  32. rushdog said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:23 am

    “Gone And Never Coming Back”
    sung by Melanie Fiona

    It’s sad that memories never die
    just fill your head with why
    then you’re caught living a lie again

    It’s sad that all he ever said
    was that he loved me to death
    but then he’s gone again
    and I was wrong again

    [Chorus]
    Cause you think it’s easier
    easy like that
    just when i wasn’t finished
    you were gone like that

    Can’t you hear me crying
    cause i need you back
    Cause I’m slowly dying
    Cause I need you bad

    But you’re gone and never coming back
    gone and not coming back
    he’s never coming back

    Shoulda known
    The long kiss goodbye
    would bring sadness in my life
    wearing this disguise again
    I wish that you would have said
    or lied to me instead
    like a bullet to my head
    like a fool I pretend
    that it’s on again
    on again

    [Chorus]
    Cause you think it’s easier
    easy like that
    just when I wasn’t finished
    you were gone like that

    Can’t you hear me crying
    Cause I need you back
    And I’m slowly dying
    cause I need you bad

    But you’re gone and never coming back
    gone and not coming back
    he’s never coming back

    [Bridge]
    Who ever said look on the brighter side
    has never been on mine
    Who ever said that he’ll get his
    never felt like this
    Ain’t no use in crying
    when you’re done like that
    cause baby, baby you took something
    that I can’t buy back

    And now you’re gone and never coming back
    coming back
    ooh he’s not coming back

    Reply
  33. sinker said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:42 am

    thanks IAN!! so very, very much.

    after reading this clue, i have a gross feeling that about 2/3rds of the things in my “i wouldn’t put ANYTHING past that woman” list compiled over the years are sadly, sickeningly true : (

    Reply
  34. sinker said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:45 am

    flying to the moon hacked – a game from hacked – player builds a self-made rocket and tries to fly to the moon. the rocket falls apart, player loses.

    Reply
  35. rushdog said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:47 am

    Ian’s continual use of world of warcraft and warhammer clues speaks for itself. It appears to be a game of who can trap the other first. And I’m guessing he’s stabbing her (woosh knife sound) in the back even though she’s the one that backed out of Cannes. Here’s some thoughts on the beginning…

    Hayneedle sandbox – children’s play yard

    flying to the moon hacked – video game w/ an unorthodox wood spacecraft to get to the moon w/the spacecraft being the least of the problems. = unorthodox lifestyle

    Boobie Trap Game is a 1960s game with three sized and colored peg/pin type things you take turns removing from a trap that looks a bit like a large mousetrap. The object is to not be the person that makes the trap snap shut. Lol, I still have the game from my youth and it’s now called Trap probably to make it more pc.

    french mistress paintbox is the box that hold the oil, acrlic & pastel paints – BP’s explanation at Cannes or the picture they’ve painted of their homelife

    Stolen valor act – I agree it’s representative of a false family image or specifically the engagement? The 2005 act (signed 12/20/06) broadened the scope and strenthened the penalties of unauthorized wear of miliary decor. So something used falsely. False family image

    gone and never coming back – caught living a lie, he’s gone (again, lol!!!)

    uncle kracker smile – “your better than the best…you make me smile”

    donning and doffing – putting on/taking off clothes – changing your appearance or the perceptions

    jango felt – (male) genetic clone who becomes a bounty hunter, assassin and mercenary – a hired investigator?

    jon voight illuminati – the family “business” like jan said and is in the spring 2011 i****t clues w/the voight family history

    brotherly love – her w/her bro

    Reply
  36. rushdog said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:07 am

    So rambling again…boobie trap game is in the title, body of the riddle and tag. And a “boobie” is on a female and that’s what is in the trap in the game. So is she trying to get out of the “mousetrap” w/out snapping it shut (getting caught)? The pic and quote are her. Someone is trying to get the prize and ’seal the abyss’ that they began looking into 1/24/12 brand new baggage…into the abyss. The abyss must connect to the “crashed” 1464 and what it reveals. And it the prize the children?

    The riddle starts:

    hayneedle sandbox – children’s play yards
    flying to the moon hacked – unorthodox spacecraft/lifestyle ?broken down

    and ends

    kid’s hideout – a camp in LA
    child welfare league of america – professional organization works w/children at risk

    As I’ve pondered the “Beatles Area Rug” (London cover?) a little I wondered if the “fooling the bladder cops” could mean cps. That clue phrase has been used three times: spring 2011 w/nowhere woman in africa clue and HRH gets a call, the 4/8/12 heimlick maneuver and the beatles area rug. That definition would be consistent with each riddle.

    Reply
  37. janindisguise said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:36 am

    @sinker:

    I believe that AJ is on a list to be one of the first people to go to the moon – for real!

    Reply
  38. sinker said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:59 am

    @janindisguise:
    i can believe that for sure. maybe because of her health and/or pending criminal charges : ) she won’t be able to make that trip after all…..

    Reply
  39. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:05 am

    So is the affair referred to in a prior clue as per the photo above? The clues sure seem to suggest that. Brad found out and is on his way out and she put out the engagement story to keep him from leaving but it didn’t work. He can’t do it until the children’s welfare is secured. Just speculating here as I have no idea. We now have two clues relating to basketball players. I wonder what Ian is trying to convey.

    Reply
  40. rushdog said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:33 am

    @Guest2:
    Yeah, the bball players clues…either someone’s having a grand ole time w/nba players or they’re representative of something else.

    In the clue “whiteside” is not capitalized. Not sure if that’s relevant. A bit about HW the bball player: born June 1989 in NC where he was raised, drafted into the nba in ‘10 to the Sacramento Kings. I wonder if he’s representative of something between bro and sis, a white version (seems a stretch and I don’t that the representation if true). She would have turned 14 in June of ‘89 and isn’t that the age when she had the ‘live in’ boyfriend?

    jango fett is a male genetic clone
    of jon voight illuninati – of the family business
    brotherly love
    sealing the abyss – trying to close the gate (leak)
    the Hassan whiteside – child born in NC in ‘89?

    OK just throwing that out there too…not really liking the result but just saying. And I’m not sure how this makes BP “stuck big time rush” unless he’s got his own mess.

    Reply
  41. Patty Anne said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:56 am

    I think you are on the right track with the theory that this has something to do with the history of incest in the Voight family. Angie was very vocal about her approval for incest with “conscenting adults”, yet it was rumored to have taken place with Angie when she was still a child. I have even heard some people state that ” incest is fine, it takes place in lots of families”, which is , imo, an attempt to justify the unjustifiable.@whatever:

    Reply
  42. Dream said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    @rushdog:
    i have long thought allowing a live in boyfriend at 14 is not the action of even the worst of mothers. i wonder if it was jolie’s mothers way of trying to put a wedge in a too close family bond.

    Reply
  43. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    @Guest2:
    There was A mystery couple on twitter taken at the Beverly Center of a Angelina look a like and possibly a James?

    Reply
  44. Dream said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:08 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    you have to wonder if the info on the hacked comp could be the supposed child of jolie. it’s been speculated there is a child from her youth that could have been a product of incest.

    Reply
  45. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:12 pm

    I dunno, I just have this FEELING that something bad is happening in that family. And I know no one is going to want to hear what I am thinking. But I am going to say it anyways.

    What IF, both of these people (Pitt and Jolie) are into incest, kiddie porn, etc. And they adopted children JUST for that?? I know, it is a disgusting thought, but hell everyday in the news you hear of a man or a woman being arrested, that have done this stuff to their OWN children or had a computer files of child porn on them…and these are so called very respected people in their community that their friends, and other family members, were in shock of learning such a thing was happening in that family. Also, what IF they pimped out those kids to others?? Ok….now I want to vomit..

    This is probably ONE reason why these kids are not allowed to go to school, have friends, and basically keep them in a familial prison…..and away from other people.

    Reply
  46. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:22 pm

    @rushdog:
    The boyfriend at 14 was named in Mortons book. Ian did allude to something going on with the Uncle before. I have forgotten what was covered on him by Morton. Close to James? Her? Brad never liked James according to several authors.

    Reply
  47. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    @whatever:
    Ian would have turned them in. He has very good sources within Brads family.

    Reply
  48. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    @Guest2:
    In the very first announcement Ian said, Angie and Basketball player story coming…. He never has said anything about Brad other than using Carmelo as an analogy for him and Lala for her, or so it seems. If that is true though, then they each have something on the other.

    Reply
  49. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:32 pm

    @sinker:
    Lol sounds like leg gate and the promise ring!

    Reply
  50. payal said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    thanks for the new clue! as usual i have no idea but i have to say anything with james haven involved bores me to death.

    Reply
  51. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:52 pm

    Kate…

    Maybe this IS Ian telling us that he turned them in….

    Reply
  52. Kate said on May 24th, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    @KATE:
    correction- it said ” Breaking Angie-Anthony Bball story coming soon” no mention of Brad there, and applied to him for some reason that we have not connected yet , unless it is her forcing Brad to marry her, but that did not work, and Ian did not sound like it was real from the beginning with “engagement”.

    Reply
  53. WCKitty said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    @whatever:
    I believe this was brought up before, but James in an uncle to those children. He also had a license plate on his car that said “Shiloh.”

    Reply
  54. janindisguise said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    @whatever:
    Sorry to say that I agree with this possibility. I wondered about them not having outside non-illuminati friends.

    Reply
  55. janindisguise said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    Hmm. French mistress paintbox. Sounds like a kid thing – the paintbox part. Which one is the French mistress? Why was Z wearing heels and going up stairs with her hiney showing? Remember that?

    Reply
  56. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    @Dream:
    That makes some sense. Maybe the second basketball clue just refers to the year of the child’s birth as someone above suggested.

    Reply
  57. janindisguise said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    I just read all the clues above over again – all together. Is Angelina trying to escape the lot of them (illuminati)?

    Reply
  58. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    On booby-traps: ” And a booby-trap is a trap set to catch an unsuspecting (idiot) victim. The first use of booby-trap (1850s) referred to practical jokes–the canonical example is balancing a bucket of water atop a door that’s ajar, to fall on the hapless dupe who opens the door. The booby-trap was a trap to catch an unsuspecting sap. By World War I, the word was applied to the more deadly booby-traps of warfare, which is the most common usage today.” This speaks for itself. Ian spelled the word differently as boobie and not sure if it’s just a mistake or deliberate. There is a punk rock band by the name Boobietrap. I don’t know if anyone can find a link to the clue in hte music or the pics (the girl) but here it is for what it’s worth: http://www.myspace.com/boobietrap.

    Gotta get back to work now :)

    Reply
  59. Tetta said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    @whatever:

    It could be in this way. But if Ian knows about it the kids ought to have been taken care of already. I don´t believe Ian would wait a second to help the kids. Is that the reason we haven´t seen the family the last weeks ? Ian says “kids hideout” and “child welfare league of America !!” Someone said it could mean the children was safe. But if it is in this way, would Brangelina be allowed to leave US. They should be in jail. Perhaps it´s only Angelina and the story about their fight before they where leaving for Cannes is planted.

    Reply
  60. Dream said on May 24th, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    “Right now, I’m just attracted to being a dad,” said Pitt in an interview in a hotel penthouse in Cannes. “Film-wise, we get to do this thing and I feel very fortunate to get to do this. So I want to contribute to the art form. I think the films have to speak to our time and be authentic in their approach.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/24/brad-pitt-killing-them-softly_n_1542161.html?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl2|sec3_lnk3%26pLid%3D163790

    inter view with pitt. do these people even think about what theya re saying? i am beginning to believe hes got that snookie thing going on.
    “i don’t know what i mean i ‘m just talking, i’m not thinking.

    what happens when pitt is no longer attracted to being a dad? we all know how he has a tendency to change what hes attracted to.

    Reply
  61. guestt said on May 24th, 2012 at 2:19 pm

    @Dream:
    What a bizarre statement. I’m just attracted to being a Dad……..For a man who just got “engaged” you would think he would mentioned his wife to be…..
    Somethings serious is going on with these two behind the scenes….
    I don’t like trying to decipher clues that suggest incest or a childs welfare……

    Reply
  62. Kate said on May 24th, 2012 at 2:47 pm

    @whatever:
    hmmm, I don’t think Ian would make a game out of something as serious as someone has sexual relations with their children, he takes parenting very serious, and that is a subject I personally doubt he would put out here. It just defies him as I know him. If it were happening, he would not make it clear that we would ever guess that, not ever. He would protect them, so that no one would ever know that is what it was. Ian is very compassionate, and there is simply no possible way he would want to be responsible for us sitting here talking about these parents doing that to their children. No, they may be a lot of things, that he finds sickening, as one puzzle suggested, and I know he does feel that way at times, but this, no. He would never ever put these young innocent children out there like that, especially if they had been victims. That is my opinion of course, but it based on the man I know. Once you expose something like that, those children’s lives would be changed forever. It is one thing to turn someone into to CFS for investigation, but to put speculate about it on a blog, that is just indecent. Ian would not do that. Not ever, he has a child himself he loves and respects.

    Reply
  63. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 2:53 pm

    @Dream:
    He may stop being attracted to them but he can’t just walk away and I don’t think he would. He’s tied to them financially at the very least until they are grown. I think what he maybe meant to say is that the children are his priority right now. He’s not exactly well spoken and I think snooki is a better comparison than britney spears. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt on this one until he proves he doesn’t deserve it. Can you imagine how utterly boring this man must be to live with?

    Reply
  64. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 2:54 pm

    “Right now, I’m just attracted to being a dad”. Who says that kind of shit?? And why is it necessary in every interview he does, to remind the public that he is a DAD?? This promotion isn’t for a Father of the Year award, it is for a movie. Why can’t he just speak about the movie itself, instead of constant promotion of himself and his personal life??? Did Ray talk about his daughter? Did Jame Galfonwhatever talk about his child? No…so why does Pitt have to sit there and remind the world, and use his children as a promotional tool?? Is it because his work or talent can’t stand on itself, so he needs to be constantly exploiting those kids??

    Reply
  65. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    @Kate:
    Thank you, Kate.

    Reply
  66. Dream said on May 24th, 2012 at 2:57 pm

    @Guest2:
    he comes off as stupid as well as pompous, an unusual combination.

    Reply
  67. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:01 pm

    @Dream:
    And yet they love him. Can’t figure that one out.

    Reply
  68. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:10 pm

    @Kate:

    You do realize Kate, that when this is keep hidden in the dark, is when the abuser(s) think they are getting away with it all. To EXPOSE this, then it is removed from being hidden, and it put OUT there to shine a light on it.
    I don’t believe that IAN would put it out there, as a game, but to SHINE the light on this very touchy subject. Incest is something NO one wants to even think of, or believe it is happening….but it happens every day.

    I don’t know IAN, so I can’t judge the man himself. But I will say KUDO”S to Ian if this is what he is doing….no child should have to live in the darkness of INCEST.

    I know FIRST hand. As I was a victim myself from an Uncle that NO one would suspect this man could of done something like this..a very respected man, a pillar of the community, and I wasn’t his only victim…, and I am not going to go into further details..but if those children are being sexually abused, those kids live in fear every single day of their lives until SOMEONE contacts the authorities. The only problem with the BRANGE, is what investigative body, in what state or Country is going to touch this? They have pretty powerful people behind them, and they don’t stay put in one place for any length of time…….and god only knows what they are involved in….I suspect they are into drug and gun smuggling and who the hell else knows. Like Pitt stated: “He sold his soul to the devil to get his movies made”. Probably one true statement this man has EVER said.

    Reply
  69. janindisguise said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:18 pm

    @whatever:
    Excellent posts(s) Whatever. Thanks. I concur.

    Reply
  70. Tetta said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:29 pm

    @Kate:

    Of cource you are right, Ian or nor any other would write about the kids and incest.But I can´t help thinking Angelina is more open about sex than any other mother as she was “sexual” already in kindergarten. I also think of the photos where Angelina is licking her kids hands. Sometimes that could be an emergency solution for any parent to do but AJ does it in a way that looks like she enjoys it. The picture Ian has choosen to illustrate his clues often means a lot. The photo of Angelina and James Haven kissing each other and “brotherly love” points to something incestuous. This is not any new item and not so disgusting to speak about as they have done it openly, in front of the cameras. Perhaps their relation still goes on. Could the crashed computer has photos of them together ?

    Reply
  71. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:30 pm

    @whatever:
    Whatever, I am so sorry to hear about what happened to you. Sadly, I think it is more prevalent than we know. Still, we musn’t rush to a conclusion that this is what is happening to these children. Suggesting such a thing in cryptic clues would not be shining a light on anything it would just be inviting gossip and I don’t think Ian would do that, at least I hope he wouldn’t. Don’t forget that kate said Ian has a good inside source and I think if anything were happening to the children they would have already called the authorities. Maybe they have but there are many other reasons for authorities to be called such as the children not being educated, health conditions that are not being treated or just plain neglect in other areas that might cause an unsafe environment for the children. Pitt’s parents seem to be somewhat involved in the lives of those children and I think they are decent people.

    Reply
  72. Tetta said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    @whatever:

    This is a sensitive question. i don´t think there is something right or wrong to do. The main thing is that the persons involved, children or grown up´s get help.

    Reply
  73. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    @Guest2:

    Well we don’t know IF the elder Pitts are “decent” people or not. Seems to me that Brad has walked away from those “christian” roots he was brought up on..maybe he figures they are hypocrites. Remember Brad Pitt was arrested for indecent exposure, or so I’ve read, before he hit it big. That is why he could never EVER adopt a child….

    Ok, I am done talking about it. Won’t bring it up again….

    Reply
  74. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    @Guest2:
    Or one parent throwing knives at another parent.

    Reply
  75. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 4:02 pm

    Oh and one more thing, my UNCLE who abused me, was considered a decent person. A pillar of the community, church going, involved with the church… and a DOCTOR to boot…had a wife, children, etc. NO one suspected this man, of the VILE things he was capable of, and that I lived through and his other victims went through, and after years of therapy, and STILL after 40 yrs, I STILL have nightmares. I thank God everyday, for him giving me a patient loving husband. There was never any justice, Legally speaking, as he put a gun to his head when his VILE and SICKNESS was exposed…..

    Reply
  76. sinker said on May 24th, 2012 at 4:11 pm

    @whatever:
    i do think any inc#st being referred to would be between the two adults – AJ and JH. My gut says the kids are not being abused in that way.. at least not yet. I wonder it the kids have seen AJ and uncle jamie in a lip-lock or more, tho.

    as for the knife throwing, i am wondering if this has something to do w/ lara croft era.

    Reply
  77. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 4:31 pm

    @whatever:
    I didn’t know he was arrested and you’re right we don’t know if the Pitts are decent people. He walked away from his Christian roots but seems to keep his parents in his life so who knows what the truth is. One can only hope that those kids have some normalcy somewhere in their lives. I truly hope I didn’t offend you, that wasn’t my intent, and I didn’t mean to sound preachy though I can see it came across that way.

    I wish Ian would give us a nod when we go off in a wrong direction. It would make the riddle solving a little easier.

    Reply
  78. AmaryEllis said on May 24th, 2012 at 5:17 pm

    @whatever:

    I am so sorry for the horror that you experienced. I admire your strength!

    Reply
  79. AmaryEllis said on May 24th, 2012 at 5:20 pm

    @Kate: I agree, if Ian had any knowledge of harm being done to those children, the is NO WAY he would not take some action and there is NO WAY he would exploit the misery of a child.

    Reply
  80. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 5:51 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    Absolutely, no possible way, he is not that kind of person.

    Reply
  81. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 5:54 pm

    @Guest2:
    In some states peeing outside or mooning a car passing by with a bunch of your friends when you are drunk is considered a level one sexual offense. Brad is not a sex offender . He was a stupid college kid, I know plenty just like him, streakers too.

    Reply
  82. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    @sinker:
    I would agree , there was A chapter in his book on it, which really was how difficult it is for these couples to break the bond. Possibly the emotional connection has resurfaced.

    Reply
  83. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:01 pm

    @WR:
    Agreed, this has been a long time coming and I am suprised to see that Ian actually posted it finally! Great job!!!

    Reply
  84. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    @AmaryEllis:

    Child Welfare League of America!! Kids HIDEOUT! Are they trying to HIDE these kids from the authorities?? Did IAN or someone that gave IAN this information already contact the proper authorities? Is that why they rushed to London, 2 months before filming her movie?? Is that why JOLIE didn’t attend Cannes, because they are afraid that if both parents are gone, SOMEONE is going to turn them over to the proper authorities??

    Oh god, I can’t talk about this anymore…..its disturbing to say the least..but there has always been something NOT normal about the way they have shield these kids from any kind of “normalcy”. School, friends, sports, constant travels….etc. They keep them in a “prison” of sorts…..no outside contacts unless THEY are right there…screening it all……….

    Reply
  85. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    @Pauly P:
    That is one of the things the illuminati supposidly do, use famous people to smuggle drugs and weapons, even secret messages – because they don’t have to go through customs like everyone else. It’s supposidly why AJ got her pilot license and had bp get his too. Basically, they are mules. Also, fits with the clue about the illuminati, but child services too. Usually people become trained to do this as a child, so for AJ and now her kids. The donning part could be about the kids, are they being paid the money the parents are making on them for endorsements??

    Reply
  86. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:07 pm

    @whatever:
    WE , I am very sorry you were exposed to such trauma , and happy to hear you have a loving husband. I was only stating my opinion. I agree a light needs to shine, just not on a victims name, especially if they a young children who are world famous. I believe The Pitts are decent , while it is true you never know what goes on behind closed doors, Doug and Julie are a testament to their parents. The people that live in Springfield speak very well of them, they are admired and loved , even by those who do not share their faith, or are not impressed with Brangelina. I have never heard a negative word.

    Reply
  87. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:08 pm

    @Peri:
    Posibbly Ellen or Chelsey Handler

    Reply
  88. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    @sinker:
    She threw knives on MAMS too lol. Ian did a story on here, was it 2009 about her throwing some at Brad when she gets angry? Do you remember that? Didn’t she say something like that , she has to do that to let off her frustation, long ago..

    Reply
  89. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    @janindisguise:
    I agree. Good info, I have also read about her family and how AJ was used and abused, passed around etc at JV’s parties, her mother’s too!

    Reply
  90. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:19 pm

    @rushdog:
    Good catch!

    Reply
  91. AmaryEllis said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    Just because child welfare league of america was mentioned in the clue doesn’t mean there are allegations of abuse (if there was abuse I am sure legal authorities would be involved, not an NGO such as CWL). My question is what ever happened with Pax’s biological mom wanting him back and the allegation that the adoption was illegal?

    Reply
  92. Guest2 said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    @KATE:
    Maybe this is what the children are hiding out from…their parents fighting and her throwing knives. That has to terribly frightening for children to see their parents violently and possibly physically fighting if some of the things she’s said in interviews are any indication. I’m sure there is a lot of yelling and screaming at the very least. Maybe this is why they keep their children isolated so that word of what goes on in that household doesn’t get out because children do talk.

    Reply
  93. liv4 said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:26 pm

    “Brotherly Love” (1995) More at IMDbPro »

    A year after his father’s fatal accident, Joe Roman returns to Philadelphia to collect his share of his Dad’s estate, a car customizing business. His reunion with Claire and his half-brothers is a little rocky. Despite her best efforts, Claire is struggling to keep the business afloat. Fifteen-year-old Matt, tormented by a number of teen crises both real and imagined, harbors a lot of resentment toward Joe. And Andy, a wildly imaginative seven-year-old, can’t quite hide his need for a father figure. It doesn’t take Joe long to realize how much he’s needed, so he accepts Claire’s offer to move in and work in the family business. Downstairs in the garage, Joe works alongside his father’s pit-crew chief, the slightly scrambled Lloyd, and Lou, a feisty conceptual artist/mechanic. The romantic tension between Lou and Joe grows as the two try to maintain a working relationship. Upstairs, Joe is becoming a part of the family he never knew, with all the adjustments, responsibilities, joys and heartaches that a family has

    Reply
  94. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:34 pm

    @Guest2:
    I sent Ian message and asked him to clear up this controversary with the children. I know he is busy but hopefully he will take the time to let us know something. No offense to anyone, but that is too dangerous of a suggestion to play with for entertainment.

    Reply
  95. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:41 pm

    @whatever:
    oooh!!!!

    Reply
  96. louisianagurl said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:41 pm

    Thanks Rush! I am going to start with some of your info…hope you don’t mind, but saves me time and you rock!

    Hayneedle sandbox…The arena in which the BRAND plays…also, things can be easily buried/hidden

    flying to the moon hacked… Play the game and try to fly From land to moon…by hacking in and cheating to get to your goal more easily…BYPASSING THE DIFFICULTY TO ACHIEVE YOUR GOAL
    boobie trap game…a game that you have to maneuver so as not to move the bar…SOMEONE TRYING TO MANEUVER WITHOUT ROCKING THE BOAT…

    french mistress paintbox… Expand your work and storage space. Rest the French Companion or French Mistress Brazilian hardwood briefcase-style chest on the drawer of a French-style easel or any flat surface. Hinged flaps fold out to expand work area. Both cases include handles for easy transport. I AGREE WITH RUSH ON THIS…THIS IS THEIR “MOBILE” FAÇADE

    stolen valor act…THEY ARE TAKING CREDIT FOR ACTS THEY ARE NOT DOING OR EARNING…HER UN ACTIVITIES…GIVING MONEY TO THEIR OWN CHARITY…MADDOX-JOLIE-PITT
    FOUNDATION … http://www.mjpasia.org CHECK OUT THE MASCOT ON THE PAGE…LOOKS LIKE A MAN IN UNIFORM

    gone and never coming back…MAN IS GONE BECAUSE SHE IS CAUGHT LIVING A LIE AGAIN…

    uncle kracker smile… You’re better then the best…I’m lucky just to linger in your light…BP HAS COMPAIRED JA TO A LIGHT THAT EVERYONE IS ATTRACTED TO, WHEN HE WAS WITH HER WAS THE LAST TIME YOU REALLY SAW HIM SMILE IN PICS…I DON’T THINK THIS IS A NOD TO HIM AND JA GETTING TOGETHER, JUST THE DISPARITY IN HOW SHE MADE HIM FEEL AND HOW AJ MAKES HIM FEEL NOW

    donning and doffing…I WORK IN A FIELD THAT USES THIS TERMINOLOGY IN A LEGAL SENSE, BUT THE REALITY IS IT JUST MEANS DRESSING AND UNDRESSING LITERALLY…COULD THIS BE DONNING AND DOFFING THE FAÇADE AT CHOICE MOMENTS…LIKE THE RED CARPET?

    jango fett… was a renowned human Mandalorian bounty hunter, assassin, mercenary, and the “father” of Boba Fett, a genetic clone of his, whom he raised as a son. Fett’s personal motto “trust no-one”, Boba was the only unaltered clone of Jango who he raised as a son. He is an exact replica of himself…GENETIC LEGACY?

    jon voight illuminati…ANOTHER GENETIC LEGACY HINT

    brotherly love…I AGREE THAT THIS HAS TO BE A NOD TO AJ AND HER BROTHER…BUT COULD IT ALSO BE THE WAY SHE FEELS ABOUT BP?

    sealing the abyss gate…in the video game, this is a seek and destroy mission with a prize for completing…I WILL HAVE TO GO WITH RUSH ON THIS ONE AND AGREE THAT THIS IS ABOUT SEALING ANY LEAKS OR KEEPING SECRETS “SWEPT UNDER THE RUG”.

    Hassan whiteside…HAS 6 SIBLINGS, BUT MOVED IN WITH DAD WHEN HE STARTED PLAYING BALL…PLAYS FOR KINGS…ANOTHER BASKETBALL REFERENCE…ONLY 5 PLAYERS ON THE COURT AT A TIME PER SIDE…TALKED ABOUT TWO PLAYERS, SO TWO SIDES FIGHTING TO WIN A GAME AGAINST EACH OTHER…ONLY 5 WALK AWAY VICTORS

    knife throw sound…the last thing you hear before you are hit…SOMEONE IS READY TO STAB THE OTHER IN THE BACK IF NECESSARY
    kids hideout…A PLACE OF PROTECTION FOR THE KIDS

    child welfare league of america!!!!! I THINK THIS IS HRH TELLING US THAT THE KIDS ARE PROTECTED FROM WHAT AJ AND HER BROTHER MAY HAVE SUFFERED.

    Love to love –SONG ABOUT LOSING SOMEONE AND WANTING THEM BACK…REMINDS ME OF BBT/AJ, HENCE THE PIC…I THINK AJ JUST LOVES TO LOVE OR WANTS TO AND KEEPS LOOKING IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES

    Reply
  97. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 6:41 pm

    @whatever:
    Maybe that’s where the bball comes into play??? Someone’s a professional ball player…hmmm

    Reply
  98. Patty Anne said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:27 pm

    Hover over the picture of Angie and her brother in a sexy liplock and you get these words, “Lovetolove”

    Song Donna Sommer wrote:

    ” It was rumored that Summer sang her very convincing orgasmic-sounding vocals on the studio floor while simulating a sex act. The rumor was partly true – after trying to record her vocal the traditional way, her producer Giorgio Moroder had her sing on the studio floor while lying on her back with the lights out, since she didn’t want the guys working on the album looking at her when she sang it. She explained that she was indeed touching herself during the vocal – she had her hand on her knee. Her boyfriend Peter served as her fantasy inspiration.”

    Reply
  99. Up the Coast said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:29 pm

    @whatever:
    YES….I completely agree, there has always been something VERY abnormal about this family, from day one. It’s not because they are famous or artists either….there is something not right about the whole bunch of them. Even when they are together, it’s like watching complete strangers that have been PUT together…they don’t seem to even like each other. Every time BP/AJ speak….I shake my head at how incoherent they sound, yet no one EVER questions them….it’s too bizarre!

    Reply
  100. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:43 pm

    @KATE:

    Thanks Kate!!! I want so desperately to be proven wrong here…..and IF Ian can clear that up, and that I’m way off base, I’ll be the FIRST one to give a huge sigh of relief!! I don’t want to hear any child being abused…it makes my heart hurt!

    Reply
  101. Dream said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    @louisianagurl:
    child welfare league of america!!!!! I THINK THIS IS HRH TELLING US THAT THE KIDS ARE PROTECTED FROM WHAT AJ AND HER BROTHER MAY HAVE SUFFERED.

    i think ur right on this one. no matter what jolie has been thru i can’t believe pitt would allow his children to suffer that kind of abuse.

    Reply
  102. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    That’s because both of them are drug abusers! And no matter what anyone else tries to tell me, they are at LEAST that. Pitt is a long way from the Missouri born boy, who grew up in a nuclear family with the white picket fence, and the Christian morals that he was taught. He’s been the cesspool called Hollywood for over 20 yrs. A place where your every desire, is met. A place where if your on TOP of the heap, you are protected….the image that you want put out there, can will be controlled and paid for.

    Right now, Pitt’s image is the family man, Dad of 6 kids. He drums it into peoples brains every time in an interview or when he is promoting a movie. What would the public THINK if they also knew he was a potheaded/alcoholic, who spends less time a day with his kids, then he does wheeling and dealing with his career projects, along with smoking his dope and drinking? When he is spotted out with his kids, 9 times out of 10, his blackberry is the one getting his attention…….or the drink in his hands…

    Reply
  103. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:10 pm

    @whatever:
    Same here, I think this is something that would upset everyone. That said, Ian could be referring to some type of neglect or other abuse. There are some overtones in the riddle that suggest the incest is between those in the photo. I would definitely remove my young children if I caught my SO with his sibling in an intimate act. They would be out of the house and his care in lightening speed. We know Brad does not like James, and I really do not want to drag JH into this either if he is not involved. That would hardly be fair. The riddle with the map of Texas seemed to focus on Brad and now this on Jolie. We have to find a way to connect them for it to really make sense. If Brad has a mystery baby mama , or whoever, then I can not see how they have much leverage over each other. The photo above indicates she would go to jail, well she would for shagging her brother. That could be a reason for inducing at such a late date. Shudder.

    Reply
  104. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    @KATE:

    I just keep going back to that “hacked computer”. There is something with that…some how connected to all of this…..was there incriminating photo’s/video’s on that computer? If there were, who are in those photo’s/vids? And who’s HANDS did this information fall into??

    I think if IAN only wanted to mention Jolie/James..he wouldn’t of added hiding kids, etc. Unless of course damaging pics of Jolie w/ James are going to be forth coming, and they are trying to hide the kids away from it all……if that is the case, Brad needs to seriously re-THINK about what kind of woman he wants around HIS children………..

    Reply
  105. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    @Dream:
    Have to admit, that was very bold of him to say “we do not have a date, we are hoping for equality in the States”. Really? YOU spent a year on ring , and not even an engagement party? Not even a cover with the kids kissing moms hand? Ha! He basically said, there is no engagement. If she had been with him and she had also weighed in on that, not too bad, but for him to announce it so matter of fact and make it very clear there will not be a date, lol, where was she screaming at the ocean?

    Reply
  106. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:22 pm

    @whatever:
    Remember though, last year he also mentioned the kids were hidden, and used a photo with armed guards in A tropical destination. They were under protective custody , but not because they had been hurt, everyone thought the same then, and he said, no, no, it does not involve the children.

    Reply
  107. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:25 pm

    @whatever:
    Yes I agree, totally, and “most likely” all of his associates are as well.

    Reply
  108. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:27 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    What is the song about? her leg? lol that has never worked for me!

    Reply
  109. WR said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:27 pm

    On the subject of incest, there is an award winning book by Marilyn Van Derber, Miss America, 1958.
    Her book won over 1900 entries in a national competition. WRITER’S DIGEST cited it as “Most Inspirational”.
    She suffered 13 years of incest. Hers seemed to be the All-American family to everyone.

    http://www.missamericabyday.com/

    Reply
  110. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    @KATE:

    Any self respecting woman, would throw that damn ring at him. Seriously? After 7 yrs together, and 6 kids….he has his publicity manager issue a statement that it is a “promise for the future”. And then at Cannes he states : Actually, Really, Truly, we don’t have a date set, and those rumors of an impending wedding for the summer are false and that we are still looking at it, and waiting for there to be marriage equality back in the States, before that date.

    Why? He had absolutely NO qualms about getting engaged to Gwen, Juliette, Julie, and Jennifer and proceeded to marry her, and back then there surely wasn’t marriage equality….

    This has got to BURN Jolie…………….

    Unless of course it was all just BS, and a way of Jolie trapping him into this “engagement”. Think about it, Jolie puts on a ring from the jeweller that designs her jewelry line. She gets photographed at the museum, and then the announcement comes from her jeweller. Tada…what can he do? He one ups her by having HIS publicity manager, just announce it was a promise for the future. Notice there was not a JOINT statement? Nope. Jolies Jewelller, Pitts PR manager. There was no talk of love between them, no talk of wanting to stay together for the rest of their lives….it was all about how excited the kids were…and how they’ve been “pushing” Brad to buy Jolie a ring….

    Reply
  111. joanne said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    @whatever:
    Its usually the one you would least expect. Sad thing to go through, I hope it made you stronger.

    Reply
  112. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:50 pm

    I like the song “Smile” . Uncle Kracker . That is his first single since 2004 Writing It Down. It was also featured in on The Office, in the episode where Pam and Jim give birth, called The Delivery. I remember that episode, they were trying to cash in on The birth and there was another guy on there that tried to get someone to have a baby with him and wanted her to sign a contract. Intially I would say that song is about a guy happy to be back with someone, or just with them, but maybe Ian used for other reasons. Their first was exploited , how much did they get for her?

    Reply
  113. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 9:54 pm

    @whatever:
    I say the latter, I doubt she would ever marry him or anyone ever again. She hated being married . It was A ploy, although, maybe by both and she jumped him and released it sooner than planned. He knew the photographer was there.

    Reply
  114. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I read the lyrics. It sounds like a forbidden love, and one can not stay away and feels drawn back? Is that right? So would that be her? Before we had the clue James jumps the shark?

    Reply
  115. payal said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:07 pm

    i just find it funny that brads hair at cannes, is a jen aniston do lol

    Reply
  116. Dream said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    @KATE:
    with the alleged fight that happened on the way to the red carpet, i saw that announcement as maybe a fu to jolie for not smiling and making nice on the red carpet.
    i could see that being a taunt in an argument. i honestly hope they do marry and settle down. go behind the camera. do good work so they don’t have to live in the spotlight.
    it would be good for the kids. i have a feeling tho jolie and pitt are addicted to the spotlight more than any drug or alcoholic drink.

    Reply
  117. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:12 pm

    @KATE:

    He may of known the photographer was there, but he didn’t know HE was being set up…..first by that ring she placed on her ring finger, and then by having that jeweller announce it. How long AFTER the jeweller’s announcement and Pitts PR manager announcement/confirmation? 24 hours? 2 days? I can’t remember…yet NO joint announcement from either of them. Brad would only confirm that there is NO wedding date.

    Pitt was promoting Moneyball and his doing the Oscar campaigning for himself. He brought up the kids wanting him to by mommy a ring, and he’s being pushed into it, and just not come out and say, yea..I’ve been working on it…. It isn’t like neither of them been engaged or married before, or they aren’t some 20 somethings getting engaged for the first time…they’ve both been around the block.

    As for Jolie, not being the one that doesn’t want to get married. Yes she does. That is the ONLY thing she doesn’t have over Jennifer. Yes, Jennifer is STILL her competition all these years later. In fact, I am sure it burned the HELL out of Jolie that when the announcement came out, it was met with a “meh” who cares…..and all articles on this after the announcement was about the media wanting to know Jennifers’ “reaction”, and had “sources” supposedly speaking for her….

    I think in the end, Jolie trapped him. Then he thought, what the hell… they could ride another positive PR blitz..esp right before his Cannes premiere….and get people stop talking about Leg-gate, and her embarrassing herself and Brad at the Oscars…..it backfired. Majority of the public thinks it was a publicity stunt, for headlines and hoping to cash in.

    Reply
  118. Patty Anne said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    Yes, that’s how I read it. They, Angie and her brother, can not stay away from what they feel together which is ilegal, immoral and dangerous to their images as she is UNHCR and he is an ordained minister now. How damning would those photos be?@KATE:

    Reply
  119. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:52 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Ok, I was reading some on this Jon Voight Illuimanai and all that jazz..so, people believe that Billy Graham and all Charismatic Christian leaders are part of this? Seriously? Jon is being targeted because he does not line our socialist prez, hey niether do I, and I vote for him, not again. There may be a HW mafia, but some of those conspiracy theories make what we say on here look like we are having ice cream and cake at Sunday School. ha! Not buying it. Obama,now he I would believe.

    Reply
  120. iwasanon said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:58 pm

    @whatever:

    Yes she trapped him but it’s not just riding the positive PR blitz. It’s deflection from Bambi having the baby as Patty Anne said in the last thread.
    They’re both trapped. She could out him on the baby while he could out her on the brother relationship.

    Recap of Patty Anne’s post from last thread tied in to what happened in Cannes

    BP & AJ agree last spring (or earlier) to keep “The Brand” going as long as they can.
    BP then gets Bambi pregnant last summer. Bambi decides to have the kid.
    BP & Bambi keep up their relationship. (Does this mean he promised her something?) His trips to Eur to see her are masked with the excuse that he’s going to oversee Chat Mir renovations.
    Jolie doesn’t know or care where he goes because it’s just a business relationship and as long as he shows up for red carpets and they talk about each during promotion then they’re fine.

    However, Jolie now finds out about the new kid and
    Patty Anne said on May 18th, 2012 at 2:16 pm –
    Yes….In fact if Brad didn’t marry Angie after having another baby out of wedlock with someone else, it would put a lie to the fantasy of “the great love story of Brangelina” because Angie would be reduced to just another one of Brad Pitt’s Baby Mommas….cheapen the entier scenario Angie built up so carefully to appear to be sooo special, desirable, and lovable. She has Brad by his balls now. If he doesn’t marry her ( as Lala told Carmello) she can take it public and not just humiliate Brad Pitt but ruin his image and reputation. Even some will back Angie as the betrayed partner much like many of us have stood by the betrayed Jennifer Aniston. Brad will be toast!!! Is this it Ian? By George, I Think We’ve Got It

    So Jolie decides to get a ring from her jeweler and have the jeweler announce the engagement.
    He has to go along with it or else Jolie will out him about the baby and it would kill his career.
    So he goes along with it, sort of (allowing CP-D to say it’s a promise for the future, but never using the word engaged)

    Next, they move to UK for her movie Maleficient
    Brad also has some movies lined up but it’s unclear how big the roles are and where/when he’ll be filming.
    (Did Brad set Bambi up in LA after she had the baby, so Jolie purposely took a movie that would be in the UK? Or did Bambi stay in the UK after giving birth?)

    Next Brad has KTS at Cannes (they all go, supposedly, although no pics of them in Cannes or verified sightings. The only thing I read that sounded like she was there is that 4 dresses had been delivered to her stylist)
    He does the morning press conf and says no date for wedding and brings up the “when everyone can marry”.
    She’s mad he said that so she decides not to go to the premiere.

    Next move? (what a chess game)
    His movie doesn’t come out until Sep so no publicity from him until then.
    Does she squeeze in a humanitarian trip before he filming begins where she arranges for some “journo” to ask her about the wedding?
    In the meantime, where’s Bambi? UK or US?

    Reply
  121. elephant said on May 24th, 2012 at 10:59 pm

    @KATE:
    Kate, I am not sure, since I haven’t read all the comments yet, but there was another reference to The Office before wasn’t there?

    Reply
  122. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:13 pm

    @whatever:
    I hadn’t thought about that, you could be right, but he had to know there would be speculation about an engagement with that ring on her hand, don’t you think? Brad is the one who first brought up getting married during his Oscar campaign also, not her. He may have set himself up. lol

    Reply
  123. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:15 pm

    @elephant:
    Oh, I don’t know, rush has a better memory on the clues than I do.

    Reply
  124. iwasanon said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:16 pm

    @whatever:

    I just want to add that the deflection is at an all time high. Your post (and the PA post from the last thread copied below) made me think about the timing of Jolie finding out about Bambi and how much Pitt & Jolie are protecting their own backs. I wonder if leg gate was her reaction to finding out about Bambi.

    And she’s got to be really, really mad about his wedding date answer. They are going to all this trouble deflecting and he just blew her off again (because he can, because he’s got something on her just like she has on him)

    Patty Anne said on May 18th, 2012 at 3:21 pm
    Someone here posted that it fits that Angie is once again calling on her ex’s for backup, and Brad is trashing Jennifer for deflection; that is something the JP’s have always done when cornered, throw past loves under the Brangelina Bus. It’s not working with Jen though, because she’s firmly ensconsed with Jtx and rumors of a baby on the way puts the lie to any fake stories Brad and or Angie could put out that she wants him back, is still hung up on him and make any truths that may come out seem to be attacks on Bragelina. What jerks they are!! BBT has done his part, and more so, in using his PR tour for his new book to praise Angie as his ex-wife and bash himself as unworthy of such a saint…..but it could all blow up in their faces if IAN OUTS THEM ….. Right Ian?? What did Lara Marsden name her baby? William Bradley Pitt II ? wouldn’t that piss off Angie much like Lala Anthony was pissed that Carmello had a baby with another woman out of wedlock. She forced Carmello to marry her OR she would inform the press and ruin his reputation and his career…yep, Angie would do just that.

    Reply
  125. iwasanon said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:18 pm

    @elephant:
    The previous one was a song in the movie Office Space while this one Kate is mentioning is the tv show The Office.

    Reply
  126. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:19 pm

    Lara Marsden, according to her I.m.d.b. page…had been working steadly since 2010 as a floor runner for several movies…….and oops is outed as having a possible affair with Brad Pitt on WWZ set. Since then she had absolutely no work lined up.

    Did he get her pregnant? Who knows……

    Reply
  127. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:19 pm

    Lara Marsden is aka Bambi

    Reply
  128. iwasanon said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:22 pm

    @KATE:
    Remember Ellen when he asked the audience for help saying “How do I get out of this?”

    Reply
  129. iwasanon said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:23 pm

    @whatever:
    yes. That was the name used on FF before anyone knew her real name

    Reply
  130. Up the Coast said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:23 pm

    @whatever:
    I also think joLIE wants to get married and agree it had to be a burn that all anyone cared about was: What did Jen think about it? :lol: joLIE is stuck in some time warp thing that her mother planted in her head. She keeps reliving it over and over….at first she was the other woman, always breaking up marriages/families and now she’s in the phase where Brad is her father, and she will have to torture him forever and ever because he is the “daddy”.
    Jon Voight did a radio interview on KLOS FM this morning….they didn’t ask him about his daughter, at all. They didn’t mention her before/during/after the interview. Now is that normal? I don’t think so.

    Reply
  131. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:24 pm

    @iwasanon:
    I don’t think we can assume this young woman had a baby if it is not confirmed, do you? Ian has not used anything to point specifically to her or even to the fact that Brad has a baby mama??? That could be a baby mama that has nothing to do with him, James is engaged, isn’t he? I agree Party made a great case, but Ian needs to yea or new before we make her a mommy. lol. :) She is in the UK I believe, with a relative.

    Reply
  132. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:26 pm

    @whatever:
    She has worked with Brad on several projects.

    Reply
  133. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:29 pm

    Kate?

    Ian doesn’t come on here anymore to even give us any heads up..whether we are close or not to any clues….I know he’s a busy man, but we keep going around in circles..and just to take a few mins of his time ..to let us know if we are close or not, would be the nice thing to do……..just my 2 cents…

    Reply
  134. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:29 pm

    @iwasanon:
    lol and now he has her blessing ha!! it is my personal opinion that they are both very manipulative and get extreme pleasure out of freaking with the masses. they smirk, smile, and act coy, but they know exactly what they are doing all.the.time.

    Reply
  135. iwasanon said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:30 pm

    @whatever:
    It’s possible
    Again from PA in the last thread
    “The three months ago clue for the UPS delivery would indicate a February birth, so Lara would have barely been pregnant in August, 2011.”

    The Oscars were Feb 26 so maybe Jolie was ticked about the baby and that’s why he had his parents come to help keep her in line. So what did she do, she exaggerated her stance when no one was around her and couldn’t control her on the red carpet and on stage. Maybe that was her “he’s mine” message to Bambi only it backfired on her when the writer made fun of her.

    Reply
  136. KATE said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:32 pm

    @whatever:
    I know, I have whined. Nagged, pleaded. Pitched temper tantrums, for whatever reason he us holding these clues close to his chest. I don’t think he really wants us to get them 100 percent. :) he has to party, sooo..the big guy is not judging on this. I have nagged him until he is annoyed already.

    Reply
  137. whatever said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:37 pm

    IAN?? If you ever get to NORTH CAROLINA, lemme know….ahead of time, by my email..and I’ll let my son treat you to a fantastic CAJUN STYLE, blackened white fish, dinner, and it will ALL be on the house…..muah……this is one of his specialties he does at his restaurant….I will NOT disclose the name on here, I don’t want those brangelooney tunes coming after me in real life…..I will be back in NC, in July..we are going to be busy planning my daughters wedding on Kure Beach next year…….and we have to scout out a place for the reception as well…that is close to the beach..I hope that Jennifer Aniston is down in Wilmington, NC by then shooting her movie…….@Screen Gems/EUE……..in Wilmington…

    Reply
  138. iwasanon said on May 24th, 2012 at 11:42 pm

    @KATE:
    Kate, Ian hasn’t yea’d or nay’d in a looooong time so who knows what he’s pointing to. The association with Carmelo and Anthony, the child in the carriage pic on twitter, the coffee shop pic on twitter that looked like Bambi, the Beatlerug(UK) clue etc all lead to guesses that he has a baby mama in the UK. It may not be Bambi but it could be since she was linked to him in tabloids.

    Reply
  139. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 12:33 am

    @iwasanon:
    Yes that is true.I agree she fits for the most part, but he also used several clues early on pointing to someone of PR and AW mix, so there is that consideration, the photo, who is that? the pics on the bed, same ethnicity as Carmelo. The pic of the duo in the mall , imo, was meant to represent Angelina and James. The baby carriage? Before ever reading anything my first reaction to that picture was, a baby girl , looks like a baby Shiloh, about a year old. It never ocurred to me Ian would be pointing to a newborn. I suppose he could have snapped that in the airport, but why go to so much trouble with the other photos, such detail, and then not so with this one? More important question for me, why is Lara anymore important in the scheme of things than Anna was? It was just a few years ago she was allegedly pregnant and gave birth to a baby boy. A beautiful model, living in Paris, or a beautiful PA and aspiring actress living in London? Is one anymore shocking than the other? At that time his twins were only a year old, and he was confronted by a reporter on his way to a PC about her, on record. He blew it off, but he was asked straight up about her coming there to confront him. Jolie wore her tampon dress and had a bit of a leg gate that year too, but they were still beloved. While the case made for Bambi makes sense, on one hand, on the other, it us a big “so what” , we did that already. No offense Ian. Maybe I am expecting too much, but when Ian tells me this is his biggest story yet, I think he means, bigger than Anna, and Bambi to me is Anna. Porn, of a trio maybe, both of them with exes maybe, someone not really daddy, love to love, that is big, but you guys may be 100 percent right and that may be why he has sort of let the story sit. I expect a lot out of Ian, because I believe in him.

    Reply
  140. HisHighness said on May 25th, 2012 at 9:38 am

    i’m talking about ange and Haven. I would never drag the kids into this. Cmon everyone, give me more credit than that.

    Reply
  141. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 10:10 am

    @HisHighness:
    Thanks for clearing that up. Kate cleared it up for me but it’s always nice to hear it directly from you. And thank you for keeping the board going with the riddles and the tweets. It’s always fun entertainment and a great escape from real life even if we do end up going in circles at times. Brange (more so ange) continues to fascinate in a sick, twisted way :)

    Wishing everyone a great Memorial Day weekend. Can’t wait for 5:00!

    Reply
  142. payal said on May 25th, 2012 at 10:17 am

    @HisHighness:

    thank you Ian! if u can will u tell us if jen is preggers or not?

    Reply
  143. Guest1 said on May 25th, 2012 at 10:34 am

    Another six degrees of separation . . .

    James Haven was in a movie last year called “Deep in the Heart” which was filmed in Texas.

    Reply
  144. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 10:56 am

    @HisHighness:
    thats nice to know. with all the child molestion/exploitation going on it would be easy to believe.

    Reply
  145. whatever said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:06 am

    Thank you IAN…It’s good to know those kids aren’t being abused……

    Reply
  146. whatever said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:08 am

    Did you all see this??

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2149667/Police-accuse-Wyclef-Jean-Al-Sharpton-laundering-money-drug-kingpin-linked-P-Diddy.html#ixzz1vrFmUssA

    Police suspected singer Wyclef Jean and activist and TV host Reverend Al Sharpton of being involved in laundering drug money, Brooklyn federal court has heard.

    Mr Jean allegedly received a $60,000 loan from hip hop manager James Rosamond, who is currently on trial for drug charges, and Mr Sharpton was allegedly given a $10,000 donation by the suspected drug kingpin, according to thesmokinggun.com.

    Testifying on Wednesday, Internal Revenue Service agent Marc Van Driessche described how federal investigators also quizzed Mr Rosamond about his relationship with Sean ‘P. Diddy’ Combs during meetings to try to strike a cooperation agreement.

    Didn’t the Jolie-Pitt foundation make a donation to Wyclef Jean’s foundation??

    Reply
  147. Guest1 said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:32 am

    There is a more detailed article on thesmokinggun:

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/celebrity/feds-question-rosemond-768095

    Reply
  148. sinker said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:33 am

    @whatever:
    Oh they sure as hell did.

    And check these out from 2005. http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/angie-dancing-pic-lol-lol-lol-hahahaha-t215755.html
    Wasted Jolie w/ Wyclef “dancing” (using that term loosely).

    Reply
  149. whatever said on May 25th, 2012 at 12:01 pm

    I’ve said, that if Mr. Braddock is successful in his plagiarism suit, in FEDERAL court, Jolie nor Pitt will want the FEDS poking into their foundations, in any judgement. Who knows…maybe this is the domino effect, that will shed light on all these “foundations” and the money laundering that is going on…and other illegal activity…maybe the Feds are starting to circle the wagon on Jolie-Pitt. Their constant travels to countries that have high drug trafficking….their lavish lifestyle, when there is absolutely NO income coming in…that would cover such a lavish lifestyle….yea..I think this is just the start of it all………..

    Pitt was just partying with P-Diddy on his yacht in Cannes.

    Reply
  150. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 12:02 pm

    @sinker:
    Is she dancing or falling?

    Reply
  151. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 12:03 pm

    @whatever:
    The feds are to busy chasing pot smokers to worry about the important stuff like this.

    Reply
  152. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 12:04 pm

    @joanne:
    gotta get those dangerous potheads off the street. :lol:

    Reply
  153. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Thank you Ian, you rock! of course you would not, xoxoxo hugs!

    Reply
  154. liv4 said on May 25th, 2012 at 12:54 pm

    Thank you HRH very much.

    I made the mistake last year of going off on a tangent about some clues I thought related to one of the kids and at that time Kate was nice enough to ask Ian and he said at that time he would not bring anything down on children EVER. It was such a relief at the time to know that you can be part of a site, feel free to guess at clues no matter how wild your guesses are and never have to worry about it involving children other than indicating they are safe. You are an interesting and cool guy Ian.

    I’m not sure I think this involves BP having children by other mothers because I feel that isn’t that shocking enough either. I think “brotherly love” would have the most impact on her image as it proved to be in the past.

    Reply
  155. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    So…..the lost computer had info about Ange/James’ secret love child? And pictures or correspondence regarding their relationship? Is this what Brad now holds over Ange’s head? And why they haven’t really been a couple for many years now?

    Reply
  156. sinker said on May 25th, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    reporting back after some JH googlerecon. there is nothing, i repeat NO_THING going in w/ him publicly. wondering if he is using a new alias??? found some youtubes w/ his “girlfriend” (snort snort) ashley reign. one called “sh*t southern girls say.” she’s cute, but no way in heLL that is romantic relationship. also, don’t see him affiliated w/ saddleback church anymore (he was reportedly a youth pastor there 3-4 years back) and the artivist group he was affiliated w/ in the past may no longer exist (website no longer working).

    Reply
  157. Tetta said on May 25th, 2012 at 1:59 pm

    @liv4:

    It feels really good to know the children are not a part of this clue. If they still live the same life as before with a mother who is drugged/drunk most of the time and a father that they probably don´t see too often I can´t think they are “safe”. Angelina wants Shilooh to be a boy and who knows what she has planed for the other kids. Of course I understand that every serious journalist avoid to report negative news about the children. But since it obvious (at least in my eyes) they live a very abnormal life that could hurt them I would like anyone but Ian to spill
    some gossip about how their life is “safe”.

    Reply
  158. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:06 pm

    @Tetta:
    That’s a good point Tetta, emotionally…there is some serious abuse going on in that family.

    Reply
  159. liv4 said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:15 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    That is what I think.

    Reply
  160. liv4 said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    @Tetta:
    You can only protect kids so much from bad parenting. Probably should have said safe to a degree huh? or maybe safe physically?

    Reply
  161. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    Just found this on ff. The Gertrude Bell movie is being made with a different director and actress. Filming starts in the Fall.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=314755&sid=210f191e5a52e2940d3ed22ec0167fa9

    Reply
  162. elby said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    The picture clearly represents Angelina and her brother James. All the old clues led me to believe they had a child that was given up for adoption when Angelina was very young. When nothing was ever revealed, I just lost interest. I understand why Ian would not want to come out with information that would hurt an innocent child and respect him for that. But wouldn’t that child be an adult now? And if the child of incest story is true, I actually feel sorry for Angelina. She may be a crazy freak, but what made her that way? And now she can’t come out with the truth because nobody would believe a crazy freak. Of course, all this is just speculation on my part. And whatever happened to the Jagger connection? That is what frustrates me about this site. All speculation, no reveal.

    Reply
  163. liv4 said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:27 pm

    @whatever:
    I just want you to know that while playing around with clues I read your post. I would have told you then that I went down the same path once thinking Ian was leaving clues implicating something terrible happening to the children and that you need not worry he would do that as he had reassured us once before when I did it that he would never do that. But to be brutally honest, I had to get off the computer after reading your post because any abuse of a child (such as the horrific abuse you suffered) just causes a physical reaction in me. I think it was selfish of me to just walk away from the topic before I told you that Ian had already let Kate know that would NEVER happen when I thought the clues were implicating something horrible. I apologize.

    Reply
  164. Tetta said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:46 pm

    @liv4:

    It´s hard to describe what “safe” stands for. But If I have a neighbor, a mother whit six kids, always being drunk I would say the children are not “safe”. The Jolie/ Pitt family has a lot of nannies so most of us rely on them and think they take care of the children. But we have read, more than once, that the nannies not are allowed to correct the kids and not to “raise” them. I hope they are allowed to stop Angelina if she throws knifes at them.

    Reply
  165. whatever said on May 25th, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    I just want to say sorry to everyone here, and IAN, if I offended anyone…I didn’t mean to do it.

    liv4…no apology needed.

    Well were off to the lake house for the weekend, everyone have a fun and safe memorial weekend….

    Reply
  166. Tetta said on May 25th, 2012 at 3:13 pm

    @liv4:

    When it comes to the Jolie / Pitt family I hope a journalist or former nanny or bodyguard has the guts to tell the authorities if something improper is going on. But I don´t think any authority has enough strength to do something. Many people in the US seems so starstrucked they don´t believe an A-list star could do any wrong. Perhaps the only way to help is to present facts in public so each and everybody will have their own opinion and create some kind of “mob” against A-List stars parent and tell them they must treat their child in a human way. I believe many kids who have famous parents have a weird upbringing and see a lot off things they don´t ought to see.

    Reply
  167. Tetta said on May 25th, 2012 at 3:22 pm

    @whatever:

    You didn´t offended me. You said what I have thought of many times. And the question of sexual abuse was on the map when the black / white pictures of Zaharah dressed in high heels were published so you are not the first one to put it in words.

    I´m so sorry for your own terrible experiences.

    But now you are going to your lake house with your family and I hope you will have a couple of nice days.

    Reply
  168. Dream said on May 25th, 2012 at 3:40 pm

    @whatever:
    u did not offend me.
    we are talking about a woman that made out with her bio brother, in public, on camera. there are obviously boundary issues in that family. for pitt to say he CHOOSE this woman to be the mother of his children, well all i can say he’s sketchy.
    I hope they are the type of people that put their past behind them and are raising their children with nothing but love and kindness. but questioning them shows you have a heart and are a normal sane person.

    Reply
  169. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2012 at 3:40 pm

    http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765551119/James-Haven-father-Jon-Voight-promote-Texas-film.html

    This was printed in February , 2012. ” Jon Voight was in Austin to help his son James Haven promote a new inspirational film about a Texan who lost everything because of alcoholism, but eventually redeemed himself.”

    I keep hearing that song, “All my exs live in Texas”…lol

    @sinker:

    Reply
  170. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    @whatever:
    Not offended here either. The thought crossed my mind. Some of those pictures of the kids are messed up, esp the one with Zahara and her hair extentions. That may be nomal?

    Reply
  171. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    @whatever:
    You have a great weekend too. You did not offend me at all; I understand where you coming from. That is one sick family but I’m glad that Ian put our minds to rest on the kids.

    Reply
  172. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    @Guest2:
    you are….

    Reply
  173. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 4:39 pm

    So all the clues point to Jolie and her brother?

    Reply
  174. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 4:57 pm

    @joanne:
    Her brother and her father, I think. I don’t want this to be taken the wrong way but I think her brother is probably the only person she truly loves and trusts and in a family with no boundaries and possible molestation going on I can almost see how the relationship could go into unorthodox territory. I certainly don’t condone that behavior – it creeps me out – but you can’t help feeling sorry for her in some ways. She had no control over her upbringing.

    Reply
  175. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 4:59 pm

    @joanne:
    I don’t think Ian is saying that this entire story from start to finish is about them, but rather how this part of the story affects the whole Brangelina story, and where it us now. I am going with current , not past tense, and no baby. I think that may apply to another part. Angie and James were one mystery couple, there was another one, on the beach. I am thinking the baby fits with them, but not as lovers.

    Reply
  176. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    @Guest2:
    I agree, sad, she is lost in many ways.

    Reply
  177. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    @whatever:
    I wasn’t offended either. Secrecy is what allows this type of hideous abuse to flourish.

    Reply
  178. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:19 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I remember reading about this…..maybe when JHaven was there, he lost his computer/phone? yikes.

    Reply
  179. iwasanon said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:32 pm

    @whatever:
    Also not offended. Have a great weekend.

    Reply
  180. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:36 pm

    @Guest2:
    I would feel sorry for her if she didn’t think her shit was ice cream.

    Reply
  181. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:38 pm

    @joanne:
    ..and went for proper concil. Movies aren’t therapy.

    Reply
  182. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:44 pm

    There is probably lots of incest in Hollyweird just like everywhere else. Sometimes I think nambla rules the world.

    Reply
  183. liv4 said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:45 pm

    I am not offended either. I am glad you shared with us. And, yes, an apology is due you from me. You just don’t leave people behind and not explain something you know will help them in their posts because it is a sensitive topic. Have a nice weekend with your lovely husband. I think you are a brave, brave girl.

    Reply
  184. siska said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:51 pm

    Thanks ian for new clue…
    I am just reading all the smart people here do their magic to solving it.
    For whatever, iam sorry to heard about your past…i am glad that you found your strength with the help of your partner.

    In light news, there are outlaw who bail on child support, and he got arrested because the bounty hunter told him that he got the part in ja movie…ha.ha

    Reply
  185. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2012 at 5:52 pm

    Please don’t feel you have to apologize for expressing your opinion. It’s how you read the clues, and as individuals we all may read somewhat differently, but when you see a photo of brother and sister in a sexy, passionate kiss, it will make you go down that road, or at least speculate what if? Just look at the world around us today and you will seriously doubt there is anyone left who has restrictions or boundaries. Ian however, would not post about children being harmed , he would take steps to stop it which we would never read about.

    So we’re back to Angie and James continuing with their incestuous relationship even after all these years. That would freak out Brad I would think, and raise paternity questions as well. Did we not have a clue or three about DNA?

    As for the other, I may be wrong, but I still think Brad’s mistress had a baby by him about four months or so ago. WR, who has an extensive memory of the Old Hollywood stories, has mentioned before how many old stars secrets come out after they die and I’m guessing we will have to wait that long for this one. Brad Pittiful has an army of protection surrounding him it seems.@whatever:

    Reply
  186. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2012 at 6:07 pm

    5. SHE’S ARTSY: Just Brad’s type! Lara plays piano and is an artist on the side. Maybe Brad — who’s an art connoisseur — will buy one of the pencil sketches from her portfolio, which she showcased on her Facebook page and includes portraits of Johnny Depp, Scarlett Johansson… and Angelina!

    http://www.okmagazine.com/news/truth-about-brad-pitts-sexy-assistant-six-things-know-about-lara-marsden

    french mistress paintbox clue

    Reply
  187. iwasanon said on May 25th, 2012 at 6:17 pm

    @KATE:

    No idea who the bed pics are. I’m not even sure those pics are tied to Brangie and if they are I don’t know how.
    The duo in the mall – IMO not AJ & JH. Never even thought of them when I saw it. Strongly resembles Bambi IMO.
    The tweets were being posted at a rapid pace at one point and I don’t even recall what clue we were on when the various pics were posted.
    The baby carriage – the fact that it specifically cut off as much as possible made me think it was just signifying a child (pic not intended to capture a specific pic)

    Why is Lara anymore important in the scheme of things than Anna was? – I weigh it more heavily because there were a ton of stories in tabs and on gossip sites about Bambi. With Amna there was no othere tabs or sites talking about Amna besides Ian. If any did, it was as a result of what Ian posted. That story seemed to disappear so I just assumed it ended up being false info. I could be wrong about that but I don’t recall. A quick search shows me the last it was discussed (from what I found) was around Mar 2010. First discussed around May 2009. I don’t know if Ian had different sources back then or if they were reliable sources as I do recall some question about reliable sources years ago. So for all I know that story was a plant to drum up interest before Cannes 2009.
    For some reason I got the feeling that Ian had different, more reliable sources after he picked up discussing them again around beginning of 2011. I don’t recall if anything was said about this or it was just a gut feeling.
    So back to why would Bambi be bigger than Amna? It would be bigger if it blows up on him/them (like Tiger or Jesse). That’s what I really want to see happen :)

    It seems to me there are 2 stories here. Pitt and someone is 1 story and Jolie/James is the other. And they both are using the stories to control the other. I don’t know that the Jolie/James story is ever going to come out when it hasn’t come out up to this point. But if Pitt has a baby mama that could definitely get out like Tiger and Jesse. Unless whatever was found on the laptop has to do with Jolie/James. Then that story would probably be the bigger story. LOL.

    Reply
  188. Dream said on May 25th, 2012 at 6:34 pm

    @joanne:
    i believe some times it is. omg i will never be able to get that image out of my mind. ewwwwbanana milkshakes.

    Reply
  189. iwasanon said on May 25th, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    @iwasanon:
    One more thing. Having said all I did in the post above, it’s also possibly Pitt is fed this Bambi thing as deflection from something else. These 2 are all about deflection. Nothing would surprise me about either of them.

    Reply
  190. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 6:54 pm

    @Dream:
    LOL, just when I was starting to forget that you had to remind me. Ewww.

    Reply
  191. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:02 pm

    @iwasanon:
    There was a photo of brad on the set of wwz where he came out of his trailer all disheveled and buttoning his shirt. In the foreground of the pic was a girl standing by a car door and all we could see was her back. It looked like bambi but we weren’t sure. There was also a man standing just inside the door of brad’s trailer looking out at brad but you couldn’t see him very well. Maybe he is what bambi was supposed to deflect from.

    Reply
  192. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    @Dream:
    :lol: I forgot about that. I stand corrected.

    Reply
  193. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    @iwasanon:
    There is a photo of the two of them, that they used to push the affair, where they are both wearing blue, I would bet my portfolio it was set up. It was not taken from a distance, and looked cued in. It was not the first set, but after the headlines had hit. Neither looked concerned. Pleased, sure, it kept him and his film in the news. Shruggs. As for the ho on the bed, it was that first picture that started the entire story. Ian acknowledged it was raunchy , but said it was part of a clue to a big story, and that night he posted the basketball and butt story, and on we went with several photos more of the same. I don’t know what they point to, just that they all had a Puerto Rican and African American ethnic mix as AC does. I know we can not all agree, I just can’t find a clue that points directly to her. We have some references to someone in Texas?

    Reply
  194. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:32 pm

    @Dream:
    @joanne:
    Yea, Ange was born to be a mom allright :shock:

    Reply
  195. iwasanon said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    @Guest2:
    I thought that was the stand in or stunt double. I remember the pic but not clearly. I’d have to look again.

    Wasn’t it around that time he went on that weekend motorcycle trip to ?Scotland or up north in England. I wonder who was on that trip with him. Whoever it was they kept it hid well.

    Reply
  196. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    @iwasanon:
    That’s for sure! And if they are playing a “boobie trap game” with each other, someone is going to get burned eventually.

    Reply
  197. guest 3 said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:35 pm

    This blog has become sick! Pedophiles? Incest? You people are really sick to even types on your computer these horrible things about people you don’t know, especially about children. I’m feeling so dirty reading this shite. Although i don’t care for JA I would never in my life accuse or insinuate these awful things.
    I truly don’t believe the regulars on this site would stoop so low.

    Reply
  198. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 7:50 pm

    Incest, the game the whole family can play. Its around more than you think.

    Reply
  199. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:01 pm

    @guest 3:
    Did it bother you that so many supported RP? It did me, but I am keenly aware that these stars live by a different code. There is no pedophilia, so take a deep breath, however far too many have Angie swapping saliva and dry humping her bub to plead innocent. The sucking face and sound of everyone holding their breath around them as she declared her love so intimately for him alone was enough for charges. She is right, she probably would be in jail, but it is not her movie roles that saved her. Jmho, I suspect hthere were some very gracious souls praying for her somewhere, and still are. One would hope.

    Reply
  200. elephant said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:10 pm

    Maybe the basketball references are because its the playoffs right now? And maybe the players he mentioned represent locations instead of real people. So Melo is for NYC and the other for Sacramento…and soon, in a few weeks, it will be the FINALS!! Maybe the locations are for where the babies are?

    Reply
  201. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:15 pm

    @guest 3:
    I have a question, why you you guys use these guest and numbers? If you have posted with us in the past, why not just be open and upfront and out with it? Why hide behind that? I know Guest2 has always used that nic, but I have seen the same posters come and go , which is nice, and they normally keep their nice, but when something controversial comes up, on goes the mask. I am asking you since you mentioned the regulars here. Your comment is WHY, we cleared this up, and if you are familiar with us , and if you read through you would have known that, so I will assume you just skimmed. Please do not judge, I spent s few hours last night reading about the illmanati, because I really do not know much about them, and I thought, what? Billy Graham, okay Obama maybe, and Bush, but Jennifer Aniston, no, okay Angie, and maybe Brad. Then I lookec at the things that dictate what and who is, so I ask, is there anyone that is not? Not denying it exist, just saying, we are pretty tame here compared to that group. Imho. ;) . So who are you?

    Reply
  202. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:17 pm

    @KATE:
    Hopefully they are praying for all wounded souls. There are lots of them. I do. I wish them peace.

    Reply
  203. WCKitty said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:19 pm

    @elephant:
    Wasn’t there a clue quite awhile back that led to Sacramento? I believe it was a business name.

    Reply
  204. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:30 pm

    @KATE:
    I read Bob Dylan was one. :(

    Reply
  205. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:36 pm

    @joanne:
    Really, I was amazed at the list. Then when I was reading an analogy of what to look for I thought, serious, who really pays attention to all this? If I someone cover their eye they are evil? Kids can not play pirates? little girls can not wear butterfly dresses , Is Butterfly Kisses suppose to be some evil message? Too much.

    Reply
  206. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:44 pm

    @joanne:
    I do, that is why when it really gets down to what it is at the final hour, I really do not have any strong negative feelings for Jolie or Brad. They both are trapped, and look as though their lives are being snatched away from them by Satan day by day, right in front of them. They put on a arrogant front, drown their souless hearts imo in booze and drugs, but in the end, it is quite sad. How can they ever really be happy though, a narcissist only worships themselves. That is the core problem they each have , that they all have, and it is why we see these washed up haggard stars who were once A list and think study happened? Their God deserted them, that is what , just as one clue Ian used, they are left dying by the side of the pool looking at their own image, that no longer exists!

    Reply
  207. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    @KATE:
    :lol: you can find the signs everywhere if you look. How many people wore their hair over one eye after Veroncia Lake did it? Symbols are everywhere. How many people wear devil jewelty to look cool or edgy? The illumini are out there but they’re not in the public eye. They have puppets for that.

    Reply
  208. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 8:57 pm

    @KATE:
    Jolie and Pitt lost their looks. Satan didn’t seem to keep his end of the deal. :lol:

    Reply
  209. WCKitty said on May 25th, 2012 at 9:01 pm

    @KATE:
    I am not amazed at some of those on the list, but Emma Watson? I don’t know if the picture in the link of AJ is Photoshopped, but she is wearing an Illuminati t-shirt.

    http://oddetorium.blogspot.com/2011/04/top-illuminati-celebrities-exposed.html

    Reply
  210. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    If guest 3 isn’t aware of the ways of this world, maybe she/he shouldn’t be on the internet at all! It’s a wild world out there…and knowledge is power, apparently your ignorance is bliss.

    Reply
  211. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Maybe it was the double but why would he be inside Brad’s trailer? And it was around the time he went away by himself and stayed in a guest house. I looked for the photo but couldn’t find it.

    Reply
  212. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 9:40 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I was thinking the same thing, its time to take off the rose colored glasses.

    Reply
  213. Guest2 said on May 25th, 2012 at 9:54 pm

    I wondered when sybil would show up. I think it’s time for a name change for me. I think I’ll change it to IwasGuest2 if “iwasanon” doesn’t mind.

    Reply
  214. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    @joanne:
    Yea, well….who are they going to complain to? :lol:

    Reply
  215. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 10:03 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Once you know what you’re looking for….it is everywhere! They don’t even bother hiding it anymore. Our children are being swept up in it, and they don’t have a clue what it’s really all about. :( Anyone who scoffs at it, is part of the problem, imo….they must have their own head in the sand or in a bottle!

    Reply
  216. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    @Guest2:
    I know :roll:

    Reply
  217. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:02 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Hey, I don’t even have a clue what it is about, I need to take a class, I can’t figure out who are the good guys and who are the bad, and just when I think I have, then another site puts them on the other list! Lol

    Reply
  218. Up the Coast said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:10 pm

    @KATE:
    Do they have a class? Cuz they should ;)

    Reply
  219. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:11 pm

    @joanne:
    lol, I bet they never imagined back in 2004 they could fade so fast.

    Reply
  220. KATE said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:12 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I would fail, ha ha

    Reply
  221. joanne said on May 25th, 2012 at 11:51 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Its a scary world and they are desensitizng are children.

    Reply
  222. WR said on May 26th, 2012 at 1:11 am

    @KATE:
    @ 8:44 p.m. Great way to put it, imo!

    Reply
  223. WCKitty said on May 26th, 2012 at 1:20 am

    @Up the Coast:
    @KATE:
    I don’t know a lot about it, but I have known about the new world order, and other secret societies. I am not surprised by people like Bono. I was surprised to see that Bobby Weir and Mikey Hart are members of the bohemian club. I’m not a GD fan, but I like a few of their songs and now I will never be able to listen to their music in the same way. Jimmy Buffet is also a member. I have always pictured members as being scary uptight rich men without a sense of humor.

    Reply
  224. Violet said on May 26th, 2012 at 7:10 am

    Hi Everybody, I thought this was a very funny article about the doubtful changes of Brad and Angie ever marrying. Enjoy! http://thestir.cafemom.com/love_sex/137934/brad_pitt_angelina_jolie_will

    Reply
  225. Violet said on May 26th, 2012 at 7:10 am

    I meant, “doubtful “chances” duh!

    Reply
  226. jansa said on May 26th, 2012 at 7:26 am

    unfortunately the world is going to hell in a bucket and if u want to live in it u have to be aware of these sick things that is happening. abuse and pedos are ripe in this world and u cannot say who is and is not abusers as they do not have a sign on their backs or foreheads they are usually the least suspect people even family members so to have a open mind is what is needed in this world or else more and more children will become victims.
    guest 3 yes it is evil but it is happening and it should be talked about otherwise it will be like the old days where children where not listened to and do u know how many adults today are still walking around with the secret in their minds because of the old ways. so before you judge go and read up about these abuses and pray for all the little kids and people that are getting abused because it is easier to ignore this than to have a open mind and discuss this issue openly. i pray every night for these people and hope God will enter into their lives to give them comfort and help by people with open minds and not those that bury their heads in the sand because it is a horrible idea that this is happening. OPEN UR EYES TO THIS NEW WORLD RUN BY THE RICH AND THE UNBELIEVERS. JMO

    Reply
  227. Liz E. said on May 26th, 2012 at 11:00 am

    “Some of those pictures of the kids are messed up, esp the one with Zahara and her hair extentions.”

    There is nothing “messed up” about that. A little girl was allowed to have fun with her hair using extensions and blue hair paint – I thought it looked adorable. Nor is there anything wrong with a photo of a child playing dress up in their mother’s heels. Sadly, the “mess up” can just as easily be in the minds of those who sexualize everything and see evil everywhere they look. There may very well be personal history that compels some to see abuse and other wrongs in innocent things and that is understandable and sad, but it is not necessarily reality.

    I am not a naive person but I hope I am a fair person who does not blindly accuse others of evil just because I recognize evil exists in the world or read about it on some website. As we all know, not everything you read is accurate or honest.

    The incest accusations against others by some posters are indeed disturbing and I appreciate the remarks of those who have been equally concerned. I have seen people falsely accused of such things and seen lives destroyed by it. False accusations do not help incest victims. In fact they do the opposite. I am disappointed that these posts have been allowed to remain here. This site may be about gossip but there is such as thing as going too far.

    I also believe that there is less conspiracy in the world than some people would want you to believe. The idea of conspiracies is an interesting and enticing notion and it sure sells but it is rarely accurate. It is very hard to keep secrets in the real world.

    Reply
  228. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:14 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I wasn’t referring to you or Kate (or the majority of people here) I was talking to anyone who thinks that conspiracies aren’t real, or think it’s better to NOT talk about the evil that surrounds us because it’s gross/creepy/sick….it’s reality, and as long as we ignore it, it WILL flourish.

    Reply
  229. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:17 pm

    @jansa:
    +1

    Reply
  230. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:20 pm

    It seems that it’s in the nature of the beast to want to believe the best in all situations. Possibly a method of self preservation? Don’t know, but I do know that we try to justify or find the good in all things and to put the nay to those we find abhorrent. However, with the technology of today, and so many videotaped interviews, one can get a better idea of the actual person behind the “personality” created for celebrity. Just as I believe God exists, I must also believe the Devil does as well….and there are some truly evil acts by man perpetrated against man. Best to keep an open mind and to be aware imo, and to reach our own conclusions based upon the facts we accumulate. It’s called “using your own brain”….lol@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  231. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    +2@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  232. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    Hello. Had to catch up as I was gone last night. Lots of reading here.

    Reading about the Illuminati. Oops – I try never to capitalize that or satan either. Not deserving IMO – a personal thing – that’s all. (Speaking of satan, BTW – he DOES NOT want anyone to ever know the truth, hence the oh that stuff’s crazy, too hard to believe, etc. He’s the father of all lies and the truth is not in him. I hate him with everything that’s in me.)

    Sorry I missed it all. That stuff is true. I put a website here once a few months ago. Don’t know if anyone went there or not. http://www.intheknow7.wordpress.com. If one knows very little about that topic, try to start with the categories that explain first before jumping into who is and who isn’t. Then one will understand. It’s been around forever it seems. Everything to me makes perfect sense now. I am now awake. I prefer being awake.

    I find, that within my gut, this thing is true. It was mind shattering (pardon the pun) to find that I have been lied to, taught historical lies and mass mind controlled for most of my entire life. I had to get through that stage, then on to a bit of anger and still more disturbance that some people are not awake yet and refuse to try to get knowledge on this.

    Yes. It is now all out there. Once one is awake, one sees it everywhere – commercials, movies, sports, politics, religion – just everywhere. Hard to swallow no doubt. Not ALL these people are controlled but most of them are.

    I was riding down the road the other day and complete compassion for AJ, BP and family overcame me. I really have a lot of compassion for AJ. I doubt if she even knew what was happening to her growing up, although apparently she does have some memories (something “they” do not want – so they traumatize (program) her even more. She has mentioned being shut in a room, etc., etc. The bigger the use of the victim, the more traumatization and it continues on for the rest of their life, unless they are delivered.

    BTW, one of the initial things done to a potential victim (esp. multigenerational illuminati) is incest by the father. Incest is encouraged with siblings as well. Then they are moved on to “others”. Yes, as a child.

    I won’t go on. The best website for explanation is the one I mentioned. It is from A to Z for “whosoever will”. It takes time to read. I took it sections at a time.

    To Whatever, I am so glad you recovered and have a happy home now. God bless you more!

    As far as AJ and JH are concerned, I pity them more than I can say. Their life has been stolen from them. They are what their masters will for them. I do know that many of these have been deprogrammed and by his Power, they were able to survive with the love of others as well . I pray that is what happened to JH. And I also pray for AJ and those children of hers. As far as Jon V., I am having a spiritual blockage of prayer – for real.

    Windy today, aren’t I? I’m tired of sitting around like a stump on a log, don’t care what people think and want, more than anything, to know the truth. It will come in handy one day.

    BTW I wonder who that beautiful young AJ lookalike that Ian photographed is? Did anyone ever say?

    Shalom.

    Reply
  233. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:31 pm

    @Liz E.:
    I was with you, all the way to the end…..I agree with you, that children like to play dress up and there is nothing wrong with that, but I think it crosses the line when pictures of children, half naked, are put out for the public to see.
    As for conspiracies…if you really believe it is hard to keep secrets in the “real world” then you must not be listening to the news. I can point out a hundred examples to you, but if you don’t want to SEE what is happening around you, then you won’t see it. That’s a great place to be, I guess.

    Reply
  234. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:33 pm

    I just posted a long arse and time consuming thing here about the illuminati and it’s not here. What a beeg surprise.

    I won’t try to write that again, however I will get in http://www.intheknow7.wordpress.com and encourage “whosoever will” to read that and try to start with the beginner categories for explanation of what it is and how it started before going on to who is and who isn’t, etc.

    Peace.

    Reply
  235. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Where are my illuminati posts going?

    Okay. http://www.intheknow7.wordpress.com

    Reply
  236. Dream said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    @Liz E.:
    and yet we still have a family, with some serious problem’s. Jolie was allowed to have a sexual partner live in with her at age of 14. we have read over and over again at some of the abuse she suffered.
    we have jolie making inappropriate remarks about her relationship with her brother. we have photos and film as well as many of having seen it at the time, of jolie and her brother behaving in an inappropriate and sexual way after the oscars.
    I am sorry but when there is this much evidence that someone has warped ideas about what is ok and what is forbidden. well i am going to keep a close eye on an y situation a child may be in danger. if this woman lived on my block i would treat her the same way. she would not get a chance to to anything to her kids cause someone will be watching.
    i wish some one had cared in the many households this happens in all the time. people always know its happening but they don’t want to say bad things about a friend or soemoen they care about. meanwhile the kids lives are ruined.

    Reply
  237. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    I just posted 3 times, one very lengthy about illuminati and they are not here!

    Reply
  238. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    http://www.intheknow7.wordpress.com – if you want to know from beginning to end. Read the primer first.

    Reply
  239. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:38 pm

    http://www.intheknow7.wordpress dot com. Maybe that’ll post.

    For those who want to know the truth! It’s all there, how and why it began, how and who they target, etc.

    Peace.

    Reply
  240. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Exactly…the truth is stranger than fiction ;) Just last night on 20/20 (I think it was) they showed video of a JUDGE keying a neighbors car and then he lied about it. A JUDGE!!!!! Seriously, if you can’t trust a judge to not vandalize your property, who the fuck can you trust????????? :shock:

    Reply
  241. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    @jansa:
    Great post.

    Reply
  242. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:54 pm

    A lot of good posts here imo.

    Reply
  243. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 12:57 pm

    @Dream:
    Anyone who looks at the picture up above, and knows they are brother and sister, and doesn’t SEE something is seriously wrong……just isn’t going to see. The desensitizing of our youth is complete :cry:

    Reply
  244. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Blah blah blah. Its messed up to me. jmo. She is the lucky child since she seems to be Jolies favorite.

    Reply
  245. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 1:34 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    ITA.

    Reply
  246. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Kids for cash made me not trust judges.

    Reply
  247. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @joanne:
    If that was Spears kids she would be hung out to dry. How many people commented on Stefani and her kids dyed hair? It can’t be okay for some and not others.

    Reply
  248. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 2:00 pm

    @joanne:
    Oh, I thought that was just a conspiracy theory ;) jk Yea, how effed up is it when you are standing in a court of law and the judge sentences your kid (a first time offender) to several months in (what amounts to) a Penitentiary, and while inside they get bullied/raped/tortured by other kids and the guards….then, when released, they commit suicide. It doesn’t get more real than that. And all becuz it’s a money making scheme? :cry:

    Reply
  249. Tinkuy said on May 26th, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    Chill out, people. The wild speculation about pedophilia, the nature of JH’s & AJ’s relationship, the Illuminati, mind control, the Bohemian Club, conspiracy theories, etc. is counterproductive. Yes, the world is an evil place. But there is much good in the world, too, and you can actually do something about it. Why not concentrate on TANGIBLE evil and wrongdoing: genocide, slavery, child abuse, human trafficking, refugees, war, violence, racism, sexism, and all additional forms of exploitation and inequality for which there is real, documented evidence?

    Reply
  250. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 2:27 pm

    It’s all related.

    I prefer to read and decide for myself and obtain my own information than to have it fed to me as if I have no brain, a/k/a sheeple type. IOW I prefer knowledge and prayer!

    But you have an added good point.

    Reply
  251. Dream said on May 26th, 2012 at 2:33 pm

    @Tinkuy:
    i have seen some real documented evidence of jh and aj’s relationship. therefor i will keep talking about it til they no longer exist. because until then those children are not completely safe. i will do everything i can to see to it people are watching. see to it those children have some chance of a normal life.
    the more it’s talked about the more chance someone will recognize a problem should it happen.

    that’s no different than what goes on in the world around me. we are all watched closely while our children are in school. because so much abuse goes on in the world everyone has to be on alert for it, if it will ever be changed.
    i am not standing behind conspiracy theories, i am standing up for what i have seen with my own eyes.

    Reply
  252. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    @janindisguise:
    +1

    Reply
  253. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 4:06 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    My favorite was, well you must have did something to deserve it.

    Reply
  254. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    Think I’ll go see the Judi Dench movie on Monday. Sounds good – for mature audiences – meaning seniors. Heh.

    Reply
  255. Guest2 said on May 26th, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    @Dream:
    Well said. What these people fail to see is that the jolie-pitts themselves have invited the world to watch their children by putting them on display for the paps and divulging personal information about them. It’s obvious to anyone with sight that the kids don’t like being photographed by the paps and are sullen and unhappy when they’re paraded in front of them. Pax even pointed a toy gun at them while his mother stood by and smiled. Shiloh is 6 years old and still sucks her thumb and carries a security blanket. Anyone who considers any of this behaviour normal is either delusional or just doesn’t care or has a vested interest in protecting brangelina. jmo.

    Reply
  256. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:09 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Great article! Our society and TPTB don’t want us thinking on our own, just following orders and the sheeple ahead of us, in line.

    Reply
  257. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:18 pm

    Back. Yes. That was a good article. I am not sheeple material. I just want others to wake up to what has and is happening at a rapid pace.

    The post I made this morning was very long and those thereafter were not posted either. What does that say?

    One thing I said is that I have much compassion for AJ and JA, particularly and for the children, particularly. I pray that they are delivered by the most High God. My heart does really hurt for them. We are all God’s children I have read. I have trouble believing he ones at the top of this evil empire are, but I’m still growing.

    So now, it’s too hot to go outside in Florida (maybe in others). We have storm warning of possible hurricanes up on the northeast coast. May God take it back out to sea – please. Anyhow, too hot – too hot – too hot.

    Guess we’ll go stay with mom as her condo complex had a B&E last night so I won’t be able to post me thinks. It’s happening. Yep crime is up. Guess what I’m gonna do about it?

    Reply
  258. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:21 pm

    @Guest2:
    No I don’t consider it normal. I have such deep discernment and feeling about those kids that have absolutely nothing to do with this forum and its clues/topics.

    Sometimes I think I should just leave, it is so disturbing but I want to be apprised of things and be reminded to pray for them. And last, but not least, to chat with you precious ladies.

    Again, shalom.

    Reply
  259. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:29 pm

    One more thing, I have reached the point where I do NOT do what certain people TELL me – not suggest – but order me to do. I am not talking about abiding by laws on the books. I am talking about everyday things. Like insurance companies assuming I am going to handle things one way – when, in fact, I have not decided how I’m going to handle the matter. Other type of companies telling/assuming that I must do things their way – when in fact I have the choice to handle it as I see fit. It seems to be in the air – you kow – that you are nothing – you are a sheeple – you are a slave and we are the boss of you (you know that saying from being a kid – you’re not the boss of me – I love that!)

    A perfect example of that is when 9-11 happened, the loud speaker commanded the people in the building to stay put. Yeah, right I wouldv’e done that. Sure I would.

    They told the guy who lives next to the condo that was robbed to stay inside after he peeked his head out to see what was going on – gobs of patrol cars, helicopter, traffic stopped, etc. Who wants to stay inside a place that could be riddled with bullets and God knows what else. Run Forrest Run!

    So I’m on a rant. We must know the truth of it all, listen to our gut and act accordingly. It’s a little late for how it once was handled.

    I used to wonder what a bumper sticker on an attorney’s car meant in the ’80s. It said “question authority”. I am proud to announce that that has been revealed to me.

    You guys have a great night. Will check back Sunday.

    And NOW I’m going .

    Reply
  260. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:35 pm

    #28

    Reply
  261. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:36 pm

    Yep. My plastic surgeon broke my thumb at the knuckle during surgery to remove a bone spur from the joint at the wrist. The knuckle was totally gone, so he improvised something that the specialists can’t identify, stuck it in the knuckle joint which is now nonfunctioning , twisted the thumb nail 45 degrees while doing so, and gave me a scar going from the nail bed to the wrist. Remember, the bone spur was small, but painful, but near the wrist area only. So when I return to have the surgical wrap removed he tells me to call my new thumb “Fraken thumb” and laughed. When it was unbandaged, we saw it was also infected. Do you know what this plastic surgeon said to me? “You must have done something”…….yea, uh huh. I certainly did “do something” immediately after leaving his office. @joanne:

    Reply
  262. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:36 pm

    News says Russian arms on the way to Libya. On where, oh where, is our girl?

    Reply
  263. janindisguise said on May 26th, 2012 at 5:53 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I hope you saw a med. malpractice attorney.

    Reply
  264. KATE said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:02 pm

    Feb. 26, 2012 Twitter comment by Hassan Whiteside- To all my followers, would you rather be Rich forever r live forever?

    Reply
  265. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:03 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Do it now why you can still go for malpratice. They are trying to do away with it, said thats the reason health care is so high. yea, right. I watched the health care go down hill the 20 years i was in it.

    Reply
  266. KATE said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:07 pm

    Jango Fett – genetic template – DNA code

    Reply
  267. KATE said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    JVI, brotherly love, abyss- keeping family business private, trusting no one.

    Reply
  268. KATE said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:16 pm

    Kids hideout, Child Welfare, protecting kids from leaks , helping family deal with adjustments.

    Reply
  269. KATE said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:30 pm

    First half sounds like Ian us saying AJ built her own image, or tried, but it has fallen apart or been sabotaged, her relationship with her brother, whatever it was damaged her forever,she wears the mask of a saint, but us like Dexter, taking it on and off, has to be ready to leave easily, pick up and go, taking everything she needs with her. her love to love is as the photo depicts. Is there somthing about to erupt? Is she being blackmailed, or was she just notified by a letter by Mr Delivery Man (that song is begging for release and then just says FO , I am out) did Brad send it? I would imagine it be embarassing to have the mother of your children exposed this way, and if it is recent, how would you feel?

    Reply
  270. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:39 pm

    Definately, however in Florida it’s nearly impossible to sue a physician for malpractice. They lobbied the legislature a few years back claiming it was hurting the medical field in Florida. I did accomplish what I wanted to though, I filed a complaint with the medical board in FL, and reported him to the hospitals he is affiliated with. @janindisguise:

    Reply
  271. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:41 pm

    I also think the referrences to DNA means they had to prove paternity possibly over a medical condition?@KATE:

    Reply
  272. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:43 pm

    And how strange is it that Angie did not attend Cannes with Brad and has had zero publicity ops scheduled? That is so not like her. So many MIA celebs recently. hmmmmm

    Reply
  273. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:54 pm

    @janindisguise:
    I guess it’s never too hot for criminals :( they are right at home in hell.

    Reply
  274. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 6:59 pm

    @KATE:
    I might add that his # is 33…a very important number for the illuminati.

    Reply
  275. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 7:01 pm

    @joanne:
    Here in CA, hospitals already have a cap on the amount you can sue for. Like you said, it won’t be long before you won’t be able to sue docs at all.

    Reply
  276. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 7:02 pm

    @KATE:
    I found some daycares and special daycares for autistic kids that were called “kids hideout” when I googled it.

    Reply
  277. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 7:14 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    THAT is very strange, indeed! ;)

    Reply
  278. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 8:51 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    What does it mean? I know he had ADD, which he did not disclose until after he was signed, I believe, and he did not play much, not a great season, and broke his ankle.

    Reply
  279. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Do you mean between the two of them? I didn’t see that film myself but I believe his character is the one who clones himself to make an army, something to that affect, which is why they refer to him as that. Remember when she played a male version in SALT , that was freaky, she looked so much like him, except she was so thin and walked rather awkward, and he was more bulked up at that time I believe. Reminds me of those dolls people have made to look like themselves.

    Reply
  280. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 8:56 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I don’t watch the news anymore, its probably like that anywhere.

    Reply
  281. joanne said on May 26th, 2012 at 8:56 pm

    @joanne:
    :oops: everywhere

    Reply
  282. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 9:01 pm

    @Dream:
    I wanted to comment on the photo above. That was a photo shoot, and when they did it, I remember the photographer was uncomfortable with them behaving that way and kissing in front of him. They have not displayed any affection at all since she married BBT, that ended her affection for her brother , at least publicly. From what has been reported, previously, Brad would not allow James to even fly on the plane with the family to Premiers when he attended, he would have to fly commercial, even to Europe. He allowed his hair dresser to, but not James, and that was back before James became involved with his faith in 09. In one of the clues Ian said “James Jumped the Shark” , we do not know if that is James however, could be a different James.

    Reply
  283. Violet said on May 26th, 2012 at 9:16 pm

    Nobody read the article i found. How come? :-(

    Reply
  284. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 9:22 pm

    @Violet:
    I read it Violet, and you know what I find so awesome about this, Ian told us this was going to happen before the engagement was even announced, lol.

    Reply
  285. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 9:42 pm

    @Kate:
    33 is the highest level of enlightenment/knowledge. He withheld information/knowledge about his ADD? So…Jon V was aware/had knowledge of the relationship between Ange/James…and he withheld the info? :oops: I don’t know.

    Reply
  286. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    @Violet:
    I read it also….it’s just that I’ve made a couple trips to Home Depot since I read it, popping in and out. I don’t see them getting married either ;) I think Ange was playing games and the whole thing took Brad by surprise, so they made up a story :roll: it’s how Ange rolls….coming up with lies and BS all the time.

    Reply
  287. Guest2 said on May 26th, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    @janindisguise:
    Jan, thank you for that link. I spent over two hours reading and watching the old news clips in the section about the bohemian grove. I didn’t realize that Alex had gone in there and secretly taped one of the ceremonies. Wow, he’s got balls. Loved that he put david gergen on the spot. I also had a chuckle listening to nixon’s comments about not shaking hands with the SF men at bh. Watching those old news clips makes you realize how much has changed in the world of television news reporting and not for the better. I didn’t know that bh was talked about openly in the news back then or maybe I wasn’t paying attention then. You don’t hear anything about it now. I try to keep an open mind when it comes to conspiracy theories but there is so much in our society today that doesn’t make sense anymore. It’s difficult to believe these powerful men of bohemian grove get together every year just to swim, drink and smoke cigars. They are scary.

    Reply
  288. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    @joanne:
    It probably is… otherwise the hospitals couldn’t afford liability insurance.

    Reply
  289. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Can you imagine as a parent how hard that would be, I would hate to be in anyone’s place that had to deal with that.

    Reply
  290. Guest2 said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    @Guest2:
    bh is supposed to be bg.

    Reply
  291. Guest2 said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:10 pm

    @Kate:
    The parents were divorced. They could have separated the children and gotten them professional help.

    Reply
  292. Violet said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:22 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks to you and Up the Coast for responding. Sometimes people get lost on this board. Ok, maybe just me. :-)

    Reply
  293. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:37 pm

    @Guest2:
    Same here. It is very easy to get carried away with conspiracies, as exciting as they are :) they definitely make gossip more fun, and we have had our share on here, probably not nearly as many as some of those sites that deal with the Illuminati, but Brange has provided some wild entertainment over the years. ha ha

    I am going to take a liberty on Ian’s behalf (with his blessing) , in hopes that it helps with the frustration level some are experiencing working on the riddles. More than some, really, have voiced their frustrations that the riddles keep coming with no resolutions, they feel Ian has never offered any insight. He has actually. Yesterday for instance, was the fourth time in six weeks that he offered some insight on the subject of the riddle, and clearly told us what this is about . The riddles are not conspiracies, even though at first glance they may appear complicated to the point that they could be. In reality, they are simple messages, tips from a source. They can not necessarily be applied to something a year ago because things change, and while in the end it may not sound exciting, it is what he is telling us. It could be a new tip, update, etc. Often we do not see the simplicity of it because we are looking for something more, bigger, more exciting, when it isn’t there. The other three he did give resolution to, are very clear, and in plain English, and “very” simple. He just offers the gist of it. Hope that helps some and no one is offended, this is for our entertainment and at the same time, he is giving us the deets on our favorite topic.

    Reply
  294. Up the Coast said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:40 pm

    @Kate:
    No, I cannot imagine :shock: But it would explain how frazzled Jon looked when he was on tv pleading with her to get help. I know that some people saw him as being creepy, but I got the feeling he was truly worried about her and didn’t know what else to do. A more powerful man would have just taken care of her and no one would have been the wiser ;)

    Reply
  295. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:43 pm

    @Guest2:
    What age are we referencing, 12 and 15? something like that? I think the boyfriend lived with her from 14- 16 then she moved to NYC to model and Jamie went to college , and the public allegations came around 23 and 26 I believe. From what I remember she was in counseling from age 10 and up but I don’t remember how long. The parents took her together.

    Reply
  296. Kate said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:46 pm

    @Guest2:
    He broke down at the station and cried like a baby in front of reporter. (was it KM?) It pissed her off more and she called him screaming at him. Maddox was not final yet, they let her bring him back to the states , before being final and she was in a panic that the broadcast was going to screw it up for her. (my best memory ?)

    Reply
  297. Dream said on May 26th, 2012 at 10:56 pm

    hand made egyptian style jewelry. is that a new one?

    Reply
  298. Dream said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:06 am

    @Kate:
    they just have the ick factor. i hope they have gotten some help as adults. who knows maybe pitt has gotten her help, i have to say with him shes been more “normal” than ever before.

    Reply
  299. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 8:10 am

    @Kate:
    I meant that if the parents suspected something improper going on between siblings they could each have taken a child to live with them before the boyfriend moved in.

    As for conspiracy theories, I’ve never thought that about this site. I do think we sometimes go off in wild directions. This riddle in particular seemed clear to be about jh and aj and family secrets of the voights not directly about the jp children. I think what might have gotten some thinking it was something sinister with the children is the child welfare league with four exclamation points. Maybe Ian just meant that the jh/aj stuff should not be going on with the kids around and someone please call in the child welfare people to put a stop to it. jmo fwiw.

    Reply
  300. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 8:12 am

    @Kate:
    Who boke down at the station, jv?

    Reply
  301. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 8:14 am

    @Guest2:
    broke…

    Reply
  302. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 8:17 am

    @Dream:
    Where did you see egyptian jewelry?

    Reply
  303. janindisguise said on May 27th, 2012 at 10:43 am

    @Guest2:

    Ditto question.

    Reply
  304. janindisguise said on May 27th, 2012 at 10:44 am

    @Guest2:
    Ditto question.

    Reply
  305. joanne said on May 27th, 2012 at 10:49 am

    @janindisguise:
    Its in the advertising section next to the STD testing. The picture is a beaded bracelet.

    Reply
  306. joanne said on May 27th, 2012 at 10:53 am

    @Kate:
    He was worried about her and it seemed genuine. If he was involved with the nasty things that supposedly happened to her as a child I don’t think he would have done that, it opened the door for her to speak out.
    I can’t believe they let her ‘adopt’ kids.

    Reply
  307. janindisguise said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:30 am

    @joanne:
    Thanks Joanne.

    Shiloh is six now. There’s a happy birthday wish at Radaronline FYI. God bless her!

    Reply
  308. Dream said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:31 am

    @Guest2:
    over there in the ads.

    Reply
  309. Dream said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:35 am

    @Dream:
    meant to add u should look at the jewelry. its very pretty lots of work went into those seed beads. i love the jewelry is big but very delicate with the tiny beads.

    Reply
  310. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:35 am

    Oh, I see, it was jv who broke down. Should have figured that out. So what does jv illuminati mean?

    Reply
  311. janindisguise said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:39 am

    @Guest2:
    He’s an actor also. I believe, based upon what I’ve researched, he is definitely illum. as well as his family. I do wonder if JH got deprogrammed as well as changing his life around. They do require special deprogramming. Again, I’ll say that JH makes me very, very sad.

    Reply
  312. AmaryEllis said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:57 am

    @Kate:
    Sorry Kate – I’ve been on here for 3 years and haven’t seen any resolution to any Brange clues and riddles. Honestly it just seems like a wild goose chase. If Ian does have inside information there are better ways of stating it so we could ‘get it’ while at the same time protecting himself legally. It doesn’t happen. It makes me question his veracity

    Reply
  313. Up the Coast said on May 27th, 2012 at 12:19 pm

    @janindisguise:
    Well…you are right about that, he is an actor. He’s a better actor too. It just seems to me that if he was a powerful man, backed by the illuminati, he would have handled it differently. She wouldn’t have been able to brush him off and not accept his calls.
    When you look at his family, there are 3 brothers who have found success in different areas and yet they do not talk about each other very much. They don’t get together and flaunt their success, as a family. It is odd.

    Reply
  314. WCKitty said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:11 pm

    Are the two tweets that Ian has recently made clues?

    Reply
  315. janindisguise said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Yeah. He didn’t seem to be able to get thru to her then. She apparently has another handler – someone who knows her trigger info. How long did she last away from dear ol’ dad? I don’t remember that. She sure seemed to escape him for a spell (no pun).

    On another note, I’m not convinced we see the real AJ sometimes, or maybe all the time. I don’t know.

    I also wonder if in that blind a while back, if she wasn’t the one who asked the sheik or someone like that, to take her away.

    Reply
  316. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    That is fine, it was just an attempt to help, and say sometimes the easiest answer is the most obvious. The riddles aren’t meant to be so hard they are frustrating. It is only when we make them more complicated than the message that they become so. Thought it might help if that was more obvious.

    Reply
  317. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I would say yes, imo

    Reply
  318. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:46 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Aren’t Chip and Jon close? I thought he was, he released some songs for his grandchilren recently, did some work in Austin, as Jon and James did, no idea if it was during the same time frame.

    Reply
  319. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    grandchildren..sorry

    Reply
  320. WCKitty said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:57 pm

    @KATE:
    Thanks Kate.

    The man is drinking both French and Italian sparkling water at the same time and it equates to double trouble?

    Reply
  321. AmaryEllis said on May 27th, 2012 at 1:58 pm

    @KATE:
    Kate – I totally wan’t saying anything negative to your response. You are the voice of reason here and I agree that it is easy to build something up to be something it isn’t, while at the same time missing something that is hiding in plain sight. I just cannot remember any resolution to any of Ian’s clues – and I doubt there will be. But none the less I still come here because I enjoy the company of such nice and interesting posters :)

    Reply
  322. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    @joanne:
    She probably never could have if she had not started where she did. BBT went with her initially to adopt him, then he went on tour I believe and she to film with Clive, (and she made that film happen) so they brought Maddox to her. When she brought him back to the US all the papers were not even in place. That was after the incident where her father pleaded on air I believe, there was another time she did the same . I am thinking his pleading came after she had not come out of her hotel room for a week on a drug binge, he was trying to find her. The hotel I think got in touch with him, and that was a nasty showdown, which prompted his desperation, I think. She pulled so many stunts it is hard to keep them straight, but her Dad seemed to always try to protect her. Her mom is the one who wanted her to screw MJ at 16 even though he was married with kids. She also is the one who let her do drugs to the point of near death . She wanted to be her friend. Ala Lohan ..this is all documented, so not my opinion.

    Reply
  323. Patty Anne said on May 27th, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    Okay Tweety Bird: Man at bar drinking with straws from two bottles. One bottle is Rochette wine from Beaujolais, France, the other is Perrier water from the Vergeze springs in the Gard department of France. Someone is sipping from two totally different tastes.

    The Sign: Exits Front And Rear; means two ways out of this mess, but which way will they take. The obvious, or the obscure?

    Seems someone is cheating, and has a tough decision of how to end the fakery and move on.

    Reply
  324. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    No offense taken, I know and that is probably what most would say, there were 3 in April. Ian does not say , here it is, he just does a follow up with the gist of it, but because it is so simple no one sees that. I did ask Ian if U could relay this before doing so, lol, not trying to be bossy , just point everyone in the right direction. That is always my intention, to help.

    Reply
  325. Tetta said on May 27th, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Wine or water, drunk or sober ? Has Brad realized he needs to stop drinking alcohol ?
    A drunk exit or a sober one ?

    Reply
  326. checkmate said on May 27th, 2012 at 2:44 pm

    libel and slander. when and where was it documented that angie was holed up in a hotel on a drug binge after adopting maddox and the hotel called jon for help? you freaks aledging child abuse by brad and angie on their children, child abuse by jon voight on angie? no wonder your ridiculous highness lets you freaks run in circles chasing your own tails.

    Reply
  327. Child Of Medusa said on May 27th, 2012 at 2:49 pm

    Last time I was here I mentioned that The Jolie show would continue because Pitt and Jolie are desperate to keep in the lime light – after years of being all mysterious with the cloak and dagger routine – they are finally showing their true colours by announcing their future wedding to the world. That “annoucement” simply confirms their rapid popularity decline in only twelve months. Ian later mentioned in a post – their desperation to keep the “Mega fame” going. It’s not only about more money – their biggest fear is to drop from the highest branch in Hollywood – they are not ready to hand over their crowns to the “next big couple” – they are way too selfish and vain for that.

    The place where Jolie has stood for the last seven years, is the very place she craved her whole life – she is not about to give up the land of worship and sycophants for ANYONE. She manipulated a “King Idiot of Hollywood” and ran up the ladder of mega-stardom. Jolie knows her and Pitt are Has-beens and she was looking to run , the marriage is only a huge PR rescue attempt they hope will work. Even if Jolie got married in westminster Abby, while walking up the isle giving birth to triplets – there would little interest – not anymore.

    She has watched her Ivory Tower crumbling for sometime and hoped to spark interest in HERSELF again by convincing the world she was sleeping with Depp – but not even rumours of adultery could light a media fire – not anymore.

    I’m not sure if anyone has discussed the “story” of Depp and Jolie? although some have mocked the idea of Depp and Dark shadows – If you enjoy Ian’s clues on here, then watch Depps new film – he is trying to tell you something- seriously. That was another reason she was “acting-up” during the awards season – she knew what Depp had done to her and she was seemingly embarrassed about Depp making a fool of her.

    She wanted Depp – not for love but to save her from the huge fall. How sad?

    IF this wedding goes ahead – I still only give them a few months. If the PR rescue had not been announced then I would have given them until August. But now, they are looking very desperate indeed, who knows how long they may drag out the Jolie Show.

    I feel bad for the kids – they never look happy. People argue that the it’s because the press are always around – but it’s their parents that subject them to it everyday – when they don’t have to!!! whoring out the kids has to be the most obvious and sick way of attention seeking in Hollywood.

    Its pathetic watching these two trying to desperately cling to what has gone.

    As for Jen – she doesn’t look like she gives a rats ass – its just everyone else thinking she does or she should. The sooner that Jolie and Pitt split the better it will be for Jen – not because she wants “Brad Back” but so the public can finally put to rest the stupid triangle that has plagued her for years. Jen was never going back to Brad – who in their right mind would take back their ex-husband and his SIX kids – come on ladies??? it was never going to happen.

    Reply
  328. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 2:58 pm

    @checkmate:
    It is in Mortons book, and he list name of who was the soure, some were Holiest mothers friends, he list family he spoke with, the only person he does not cite for info he used and he should have is Ian. Overall his book is well documented, although he whitewashed Jolie and her ivory tower. Sigh, checkmate, I am trying to be fair to you, but calling me a liar really pisses me off, I am getting tirex of your childish rants. Calling one a freak and constantly harassing them and stalking them ? Have you read the new laws on posting online recently? If you would like to debate like an debate like a civilized adult , please let’s do so, if not, please do-not-respond-to-me. Thanks

    Reply
  329. Tetta said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:01 pm

    Someone above said she felt sad about JH. So do I. They must have had a tight relation as siblings. How did JH feel when AJ´s boyfriend move into their house ? Jealous, I think. And then always see her with different men. He was a part of Angelinas life until Brad throw him out.

    Perhaps Marcelina choosed between pest and cholera. What was the best or what was less
    hard ? Preventing her children from having an insestuous relation or let a 14 year old girl have a live in boyfriend ?

    Neither alternative was OK in my eyes but perhaps the best Marcelina could think of. Not that I think I´m so much wiser than M, but it´s always easier when you stand outside the problem.

    Reply
  330. Patty Anne said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    Makes sense to me. With the popularity of Brangelina waning it’s time for a new direction – different ones for each?@Tetta:

    Reply
  331. Tetta said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:18 pm

    @checkmate:

    As I understand it AJ was locked in a hotel room before she had Maddox. Maybe JV asked for help in public after Max arrived because then AJ´s drug use also affected a child.

    Reply
  332. Dream said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:19 pm

    @janindisguise:
    lindsey lohan is with a sheik now. i am thinking that was probably her.

    Reply
  333. Dream said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:24 pm

    @checkmate:
    blah blah blah ur about as interesting as cow poop.

    Reply
  334. checkmate said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:25 pm

    a tabloid book is your “source” just like your ridiculous highness’s dud.

    Reply
  335. KATE said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:25 pm

    @Tetta:
    Trying to remember, he is 3 years older, was he still there? JH did a film at college , and she starred in it, nude , he produced it, directed it, I have forgotten the details . She also did her first love scene , nude, as a minor, she was 17. I am not going into all the details, but anyone can easily check all this if they care that much. They obviously felt comfortable with each other, and she behaved like an exhibitionist, imo, for attention. Well, she certainly got it! Everyone have a safe Memorial Day Holiday , stay home and drink so someone else can live! Or take a cab!! God Bless all the men and women and families who have sacraficed so much so we have the freedom to enjoy life! xoxoxo. To all the great commenters here, thanks for always putting up with me! Cheers. :)

    Reply
  336. Up the Coast said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:27 pm

    @Dream:
    :lol: hahahaha and as smelly too!

    Reply
  337. checkmate said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    Libel and Slander.

    Reply
  338. Up the Coast said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:34 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    “Even if Jolie got married in westminster Abby, while walking up the isle giving birth to triplets – there would be little interest – not anymore.” :)

    Reply
  339. Patty Anne said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    You are a playground bully who only feels relevant if they can be rude to others. Grow up .@checkmate:

    Reply
  340. Patty Anne said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:37 pm

    I loved that comment too~! I can just see Angie now wearing a fake triplet belly , leaning wayyyy back to make it appear much larger, waddling up the isle on that skinny RightLeg of Oscar fame….what a joke she has become, and she did it all on her own.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  341. Dream said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    shhh shes about to plop down on my bingo number.

    Reply
  342. Tetta said on May 27th, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    @KATE:

    Cheers Kate ! :lol:

    Reply
  343. Up the Coast said on May 27th, 2012 at 4:10 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    That’s the best part ;)

    Reply
  344. Dream said on May 27th, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    lol com always has posts i love to read. hope everyone has a wonderful weekend.

    Reply
  345. checkmate said on May 27th, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    bye freaks. i have a life. i will leave you all to chase your tails and smell your own asses.

    Reply
  346. Up the Coast said on May 27th, 2012 at 4:40 pm

    @checkmate:
    :lol: No you don’t :lol:

    Reply
  347. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 7:59 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol: She’ll continue to lurk until she can’t control herself any longer and then she’ll vomit her bile all over the board, again.

    Reply
  348. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 8:13 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    Hi COM, I did see the movie and it sure seemed to me that the character of angelique was modeled after jolie. Eva Green even did the posing thing that aj does. I actually wondered if depp was trying to tell vanessa something about jolie and what happened during filming of TT.

    Reply
  349. Guest2 said on May 27th, 2012 at 8:15 pm

    @KATE:
    You have a safe Memorial Day too. Thanks for your input and for contacting Ian in our behalf.

    Reply
  350. janindisguise said on May 27th, 2012 at 9:46 pm

    @KATE:
    And you have a safe Memorial Day weekend as well. I won’t be drinking. I used up all of that about 1985 and have not had a drink since. Halleluya! But ‘chall be good and safe and have a merry time with friends and loved ones!

    Reply
  351. joanne said on May 27th, 2012 at 10:36 pm

    Have a safe and Memorial Day.

    Reply
  352. Wild One said on May 27th, 2012 at 10:53 pm

    Can’t the two of them at least get their stories straight? Sounds like a PR battle between Brad and Angie is in full swing now.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2150553/Angelina-Jolie-Brad-Pitt-wedding-plans-ice-puts-work-first.html

    Reply
  353. WR said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:15 pm

    Winners at the Cannes Film Festival:

    Palme d’Or went to “Amour”, a film by Michael Haneke. It features 85 year old, Emmanuel Riva, and 81 year old Jean-Louis Trintignant.

    Best Actor, went to Mads Mikkelsen, starring in Thomas Vinterberg’s “The Hunt”, as a Danish kindergarten teacher’s assistant whose life disintegrates after he is unjustly accused of child molestation.

    Best Actress, was a tie between Cristina Flutur and Cosmina Stratan, of “Beyond the Hills”. It’s the story of a lonely young woman, (Flutur), who returns to Romania from Germany, and attempts to extricate her former lover, (Stratan), from her happy new life as a nun, with disastrous results.

    Best Screenplay went to the writer of “Beyond the Hills”, Romanian director, Cristian Mungiu.

    The stars of “Amour” have a good shot at oscar nominations. And
    if the voters see “The Hunt”, the lead actor could be in the race for Best Actor.

    Reply
  354. Up the Coast said on May 27th, 2012 at 11:15 pm

    @joanne:
    +1 :)

    Reply
  355. siska said on May 28th, 2012 at 3:20 am

    Just something light…sweeden won the eurovision song contest..my fav actually from Uk and Germany…but not happen…Sweeden song is good..at least the Russian granny not win it,..they are the second place and Uk was second from the last…there are something wrong there,,,

    Reply
  356. janindisguise said on May 28th, 2012 at 3:44 am

    Yay Sweden!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  357. Tetta said on May 28th, 2012 at 4:52 am

    @janindisguise:

    + 1 :lol:

    Reply
  358. Up the Coast said on May 28th, 2012 at 11:59 am

    @Tetta:
    +2

    Reply
  359. payal said on May 28th, 2012 at 12:40 pm

    new twitter clues

    Reply
  360. AmaryEllis said on May 28th, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    Off Topic – Today is Memorial Day in the US, honoring those in the armed forces who have given their lives in the line of service. Rest in peace dear souls

    Reply
  361. janindisguise said on May 28th, 2012 at 1:20 pm

    @A\maryEllis:
    Yes!

    Reply
  362. joanne said on May 28th, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    If you served in WWII you are entitled to a free gravestone. I also hope their souls rip.

    Reply
  363. Tetta said on May 28th, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    @AmaryEllis:

    They died because of unnecessary wars. RIP

    Reply
  364. Liz E. said on May 28th, 2012 at 2:35 pm

    Hi, kate. Hope your holiday is going well. May I join you in saluting all those who gave so much for others.

    “When she [Jolie] brought him [Maddox] back to the US all the papers were not even in place. That was after the incident where her father pleaded on air I believe.”

    Angelina couldn’t bring Maddox into the US until the US govt had completed its investigation into his adoption. I’m sure I’ve referred to this before but when the allegations of wrongdoing involving Cambodian adoptions by the Seattle adoption agency were made there were about 100 families with adoptions already begun – one of those families was Angelina. The allegations of wrongdoing did not involve Maddox’s adoption nor any of those 100 families. Indeed after what seems like very thorough investigations by the Cambodian govt and by several agencies of the US govt (including the Dept of Justice which sent investigators into the field in Cambodia) all of the pending 100 or so adoptions were cleared by both Cambodia and the US. It was at that time that Angelina was allowed to bring Maddox into the US – because to bring him in he had to be issued a US passport which in effect made him a US citizen. Angelina had been able to bring Maddox into England at an earlier date and that’s where she stayed at her home while waiting for US clearance.

    Angelina brought Maddox into the US in late May or early June and Jon’s TV appearance was in August .

    Do you have a link to anything about this alleged hotel incident? I have never read mention of that. When exactly is it supposed to have happened and what hotel and how was it never known about? I’m really curious.

    I also remember Jon Voight discussing her adolescent cutting and him saying he never knew about it and had just learned about it and that was what he was talking about on that TV appearance. I also think he was very upset and probably angry at her because she had just legally filed to drop Voight as her last name in June and it had hit the news shortly before his TV appearance. That certainly was a slap in his face and must have hurt plus he has always struck me as a rather controlling type male.

    Reply
  365. Dream said on May 28th, 2012 at 3:36 pm

    @Liz E.:
    thank you. having come to this subject late, i am interested in all points of view. it helps me to see it from other angles when i try to find the original story. i appreciate all the opinions here.

    Reply
  366. Dream said on May 28th, 2012 at 3:41 pm

    and taht really is not what i am trying to say liz. lol i have a hard time on occasion expressing myself when the meds kick in. i hope it came across more as i meant it.
    i don’t particularly like jolie and its easy to fall into a bash her attitude for me. i just don’t like being that way in general.
    i am not perfect. i get called nice a lot. i am no nicer than anyone else. i just don’t like posting when i am angry. on the occasions when i do it is obvious.
    this site has been so wonderful. if only all the internet and all the world for that matter could be like here. lots of intelligent people talking with just a few kindergarteners trying to topple the tower. instead of the other way around.

    Reply
  367. Liz E. said on May 28th, 2012 at 4:12 pm

    Hello, Dream. Popping back in before I go out and saw your reply. Please don’t worry about how you come across in a post – at least not in regards to me. I appreciate your explanation but it really isn’t necessary. By now I would hope that everyone who posts on the internet understands that it is near impossible to convey tone or attitude via this medium. I’m not thin skinned at all and I am as guilty as the next of being too blunt and neglecting the niceties when I post.

    I also think it may be better to just take some posters in fun and not let anyone bother you. I am sorry your meds affect you like that. Hope you can relax and enjoy the rest of the day.

    Reply
  368. janindisguise said on May 28th, 2012 at 4:16 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Sorry I don’t have info on the hotel thing. But I saved this once about Vietnamese adoptions:

    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/05/1025667059799.html

    Reply
  369. AmaryEllis said on May 28th, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    @Tetta:
    I wasn’t debating or evaluating the circumstances of their deaths – I was just acknowledging their sacrifice.

    Reply
  370. AmaryEllis said on May 28th, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    Interesting little factoid: The US does not have an extradition treaty with any of the countries the Jolie Pitt children were born in: Ethiopia, France, Vietnam, Cambodia, Namibia – I on’t know why, but I find that interesting

    Reply
  371. Patty Anne said on May 28th, 2012 at 4:58 pm

    I think people are concerned because of all the sudden claims of wrong doings with more than one Jolie adoption. Example: Zahara. ” When rumours surfaced last week in America that all was not as it appeared with the paperwork, the American headquarters of the international adoption agency Wide Horizons For Children initially insisted that Zahara’s mother was dead. And yet in Ethiopia, the man who brought Zahara to the agency knows Mentewab is alive and has been attempting to shut her up.”

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-496176/Why-did-adoption-agency-tell-Angelina-Jolie-I-died-AIDS-gave-baby.html#ixzz1wCSZ8qKQ

    It would be doubly heartbreaking for the biological parent(s) as well as the adoptive parent(s) to discover after some time that the adoption was not as proported to have been originally. The legal and moral repercussions could be devastating for both parties as well as the child.

    Reply
  372. Patty Anne said on May 28th, 2012 at 5:03 pm

    I found this in my library of interesting stories:

    http://perezhilton.com/2007-11-20-zahara-jolie-pitts-mom-reads-perezhiltoncom

    Two video’s of Zahara’s biological mother speaking about her child.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  373. Patty Anne said on May 28th, 2012 at 5:04 pm

    Sorry, as with so many other Jolie information on the net, these videos are not available to show now because, “They Are Private”…O…Kay. The photos of them are still there though. @Patty Anne:

    Reply
  374. AmaryEllis said on May 28th, 2012 at 5:43 pm

    Questionable adoption of Maddox – questionable adoption agency bought the baby from his mother for $100, claimed bio mom was dead, she wasn’t – wants Maddox back http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/01/08/1073437411857.html

    Questionable adoption of zahara – was told the bio mom died from AIDS and the baby was HIV+. Zahara is not HIV+ and the bio mom is not dead, she showed up wanting z back but has become quiet, probably bought off http://voices.yahoo.com/astonishing-news-birthmother-zahara-jolie-670604.html

    Pax – mom gave baby up at birth because she was addicted to drugs – cleaned up her act and now wants him back http://www.gossipcop.com/pax-jolie-pitt-birth-mom-mother-vietnam-reunion-angelina-brad/

    I understand there are many issues with international adoptions and many adoptive parents are fooled or scammed thinking they were dealing with reputable agencies – but with all the money and legal expertise at Jolie’s fingertips there should be NO reason 3 out of 3 adoptions are shady if not downright ilegal

    Reply
  375. AmaryEllis said on May 28th, 2012 at 5:49 pm

    There are often problems with international adoptions but with all of Jolie’s money and legal expertise at her fingertips there is NO reason 3 out of 3 adoptions should be questionable

    Maddox – bought from his birth mother for $100 by the shady agency Jolie used
    Pax – birth mother was addicted to drugs, gave him up at birth, she resurfaced wanting him back

    Zahara – supposedly birth mom was dead, she is not. She resurfaced and then net quiet, pbrobably bought off

    Reply
  376. Tetta said on May 28th, 2012 at 5:53 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    One more misunderstanding. I thought you wrote your comment in such a beautiful way so I thought of writing “+ 1 ” but after thinking twice I thought it was disrespectful to the soldiers who lost their lives in wars. So I tried to write something simple to show my respect without any thoughts of what you wrote in your comment.

    Reply
  377. AmaryEllis said on May 28th, 2012 at 6:02 pm

    @Tetta:
    war and death – so complicated, so sad

    Reply
  378. AmaryEllis said on May 28th, 2012 at 6:03 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    No misunderstanding. Luv ya Tetta!

    Reply
  379. Dream said on May 28th, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    @janindisguise:
    for the record i know how much research you guys have done on this subject. its nice to read original documents but i also know things on the internet disappear so i am just glad to hear, read, what you found in your own words.

    Reply
  380. Dream said on May 28th, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    i know several people that have gone to asia to adopt. from what i understand it is customary to pay people off. i would think if regular people are given a little better treatment for the tips then celebs that have a lot of money are probably asked for even more.

    Reply
  381. Up the Coast said on May 28th, 2012 at 6:42 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    Exactly! What are the odds that 3 out of 3 adoptions from various different countries were all illegal adoptions where the mother’s of these children are ALL still alive??? These children are not orphans, so she has purchased children illegally. I would think that if it happened once…..she would have made damn sure it didn’t happen the second and third time. Unless of course, her intention was to purchase children on the open market.

    Reply
  382. Patty Anne said on May 28th, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    One thing I’ve learned from being on the Internet is that anything you save to file, or do a screen shot of can vanish in an instant. If it’s something that you find important, print it out to your printer and make a file folder for them. That way you can always scan them to your computer when you want to post them. More than one way to skin a cat….lol

    Reply
  383. joanne said on May 28th, 2012 at 9:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Great idea.

    Reply
  384. > said on May 28th, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    @whatever:
    do you all really believe the nonsense you’ve all come up with over the years here?

    Reply
  385. janindisguise said on May 28th, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Thanks for that saving tip.

    Reply
  386. > said on May 28th, 2012 at 9:58 pm

    @janindisguise:
    you read about. where? here? Other speculative forums? Give some reasonable citation. You folks merely quote yourselves and each other as sources.

    Reply
  387. Liz E. said on May 28th, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    Very few children who are adopted anywhere are orphans in the real sense. People give their children up for addoption all the time. “Orphan” is a legal term. The state department considers children given up for adoption or abandoned to be “orphans.” There are other circumstances under which the state dept considers children legally orphans. A friend adopted a baby girl many years ago and both her parents were alive and actually had good jobs with health insurance (they were police officers – not married) but the mother chose to give her up for adoption and the father did not object. That is the more typical scenario with adoptions – not headlines that read Parents Killed in Auto Accident. So I don’t know where this idea comes from that adopted children never have living parents. Most do.

    As I noted earlier, Maddox’s adoption was investigated by a number of US Agencies including the Department of Justice. DOJ does not play with these things. No irregularities were found in the adoption and Maddox’s true name was known so it wasn’t as if they didn’t speak with the family. Zahara’s grandmother arranged for her adoption and she provided the information that the orpanage relied on. A woman who claimed to be Zahara’s mother (though that was never proven) never said she wanted Zahara back. She said she was happy with the adoption and for her child’s future. Though I seem to remember more than one woman claiming to be her mother. Do people think these allegations can’t also be the result of paying off someone to sell sensational headlines?

    As for Pax’s mother, she abandoned him (allegedly due to her drugs) and similarly he was turned over to an orphanage by his grandparent(s). Pax had been at that orphanage for over 3 years. At some point that child gets to move on with a permanent family.

    None of the circumstances surrounding her adoptions are all that unusual at all. And none of them have been found to be illegal. No matter how many times people say it doesn’t make it true. Some people think Angelina is magical in her omnipotence. She’s not. If anything I suspect it would be harder for her to hide irregularities. But people are free to believe what they want even with no proof.

    I am also aware that in foreign countries it is customary to provide money to families for their expenses – for instance, travel and living expenses in furtherance of the adoption. Those are not considered bribes. Even adoptions and surrogacy arrangements in the US are allowed to provide for payments for expenses and those can get very high. That is also not considered bribery. I also remember that with the Vietnamese adoption some media reported that Jolie donated some huge amount of money to the orphanage implying it was a bribe but that turned out to be a nominal amount that all adoptive parents pay.

    I believe there is always a segment of the media ready to say anything to create a sensational headline. That segment is also perfectly willing to pay people to play a role in their stories. If there was real evidence out there of illegalities I suspect we’d know about them by now.

    I think people can voice their objections to wars without it being considered disrespectful to those who fought. I didn’t think reflecting on the waste of war detracted from the honor of those who fought in it. Don’t all wars reflect a failure in some way?

    If something is no longer in cache on the internet you can try the WaybackMachine.

    Such heaviness in all these topics. :( We need something light hearted and entertaining.

    Reply
  388. joanne said on May 28th, 2012 at 10:42 pm

    http://www.brandeis.edu/investigate/adoption/CambodiaNews.html

    Reply
  389. Dream said on May 28th, 2012 at 11:27 pm

    @joanne:
    ty joanne lots for me to catch up on. i am late to this party and missed so much.

    @Liz E.:
    sorry about the drug reference. i forget the weight of word. I love that phase, read it in a book once, some things that one takes for granted as part of ones life can be a heavy burden for others. i always try to remember taht when talking to others.
    i am good and enjoyed my day. i recently got back in contact with old friends from grade school. its been a blast catching up on their lives. today was a good day when they all had free time to talk.
    i hope ur day went well as well.

    Reply
  390. Dream said on May 28th, 2012 at 11:46 pm

    @joanne:
    i have said it before ,if u want to see what a wonderful adopted family looks like look at the debolts.
    their documentary will leave u feeling like u have not worked hard enough lol.
    they were the most amazing family. everyone was just expected to find a way to fit in. and all the kids were treated the same as abled children were.
    i can’t even imagine packing and putting all those kids in cars to take vacations. or 16 or 17 special needs kids in the pool at one time. a lot of what they did would not be allowed now. a couple of the girls were not able to wash their own hair and one of the boys job was to help them bathe and wash their hair for them. lol seems a little weird now but those kids were so great. they made each and everyone go to their limits and beyond. they were expected to do chores have jobs.
    mrs debolt was the original foreign adoption advocate.

    Reply
  391. liv4 said on May 29th, 2012 at 10:51 am

    Ian has some new twitter clues this morning that might mean something to someone. The only thing I can figure out is one of them has a pretty new Canadian girl and the other has a black man. With those two it would be hard to figure out who has who.

    Reply
  392. joanne said on May 29th, 2012 at 11:07 am

    I looked up Marto Napoli and saw lots of dildos. :lol:

    Reply
  393. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    @joanne:
    Glad I didn’t look it up from work :)

    Are we sure all the twitters are clues and not Ian communicating with others? I know kate said they were but still makes you wonder. Thanks for posting those links, Joanne. I see that someone is trying to steer the conversation away from the topic of this riddle.

    Reply
  394. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    LOL, I Googled malware.com for some trojan security software and must have mispelled the first word of this….Do Not Mispell Malware! Oh My Gosh….I’m embarrassed for my browser history now.@Guest2:

    Reply
  395. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 1:17 pm

    @liv4:
    :shock:

    Reply
  396. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    LOL, sometimes when I’m googling the weirder stuff relating to these riddles, I think if I should ever die under suspicious circumstances or go missing and they try to find clues on my computer, they will think I have a mysterious secret life that will completely belie my boring little real life (which I happen to love by the way).

    Reply
  397. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    @Guest2:
    I’ve thought about that too! And I’ve already warned my husband :lol:

    Reply
  398. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 1:41 pm

    I guess Ian thought we weren’t getting it in English so now he’s giving us wtitter clues in French??

    Reply
  399. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 1:44 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I should perhaps tell one of my friends about this site but I think I would be embarrassed to let anyone know I gossip about brangie. Surely, they will think I’ve lost my mind. You guys are the only ones who understand this :)

    Reply
  400. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    Actually, I think Ian is having a conversation with someone on twitter so I will stay out of it and not consider them clues. Back to work now.

    Reply
  401. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Of course, you are right, people give up their children for adoption all the time…but they aren’t technically orphans, even when they live (temporarily) in an orphanage. They are given up for adoption, or sometimes they are taken from the mother/parents due to abuse. But as many people here have said, again and again, that Ange has the means and access to xlnt lawyers who could make sure that her adoptions are above board, especially after the first one was questionable. So either she’s cheap, or she chooses to do things illegally.

    I also agree with you, that “people are free to believe what they want even with no proof” AND with proof! That door swings both ways.

    Reply
  402. rushdog said on May 29th, 2012 at 2:54 pm

    @Kate:
    Hello everyone! Kate, can you elaborate on this. I know on this thread he made it clear that the J-P children are not a part. But, what are the other three times in the last six weeks where Ian has made it clear? Do you know the three times or did Ian indicate to you there have been three? I’ve had to back off a little on this because there gets to be too much information spinning in my head and then ideas don’t surface. Even though I try and read the threads I could just as easily miss his “clarifications” lol!!

    Reply
  403. rushdog said on May 29th, 2012 at 2:58 pm

    @Guest2:
    So you don’t think “throw the cocksucker in without a lifejacket and she’s yours for life” has anything to do with “our girl?” Lol, just kidding.

    Reply
  404. sinker said on May 29th, 2012 at 3:06 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_laundering

    One agency AJ used was shut down. There are AJ defenders who say that any mothers who “sold” their children and deserve what they got. Nice try. grrrrrr…… In impoverished countries, there are agencies that offer to take care of a child for a while under the mother can get back on her feet. When she goes back months later to get the child, it has been sold overseas. The child adoption issue is the only issue that keeps me interested in AJ at all. I despise her for using children the way she has.

    Reply
  405. rushdog said on May 29th, 2012 at 3:15 pm

    @Violet:
    I had to look back and find this post to read the article. Thanks for the post. Now I have to read all the Illuminati articles posted and that could take a while! I agree w/the article, it’s their business whether they get married and plenty of people have children w/out doing so. I prefer marriage. My criticism of them is the lack of the words “no comment” in their interviews regardless of subject. But, of course, no comment wouldn’t garner them as many headlines!

    Reply
  406. rushdog said on May 29th, 2012 at 3:21 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Thanks for this link. “Openly gay James Haven” I’ve never read that before though it wouldn’t be surprising to me. There was a pic w/in the last year of him kissing his girlfriend goodbye (in a parking garage maybe?) and I’d say JH looked more comfortable kissing his sister than his girlfriend.

    Reply
  407. rushdog said on May 29th, 2012 at 3:34 pm

    @Guest2:
    I think the live-in boyfriend was more to help keep sister and brother apart rather than keep her from hanging out in the park or however she explained it. If she was occupied w/a boyfriend in the house she wouldn’t be pining away for anyone else.

    Reply
  408. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 4:13 pm

    @rushdog:
    Lol, that part fits actually. It’s just that he directed the comment to someone so I thought maybe it had nothing to with this riddle.

    Reply
  409. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    @rushdog:
    I agree though I think a better solution would have been for the son to go live with the father. That probably wouldn’t have stopped the boyfriend from moving in though if the daughter wanted him there.

    Reply
  410. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 4:50 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    These people that come here and bash Ian and the rest of us should really read what comes out of the mouths of the people involved. James confesses to having a “crush” on his sister and calls her his perfect woman. She says publicly that she is so in love with her brother and then they have a lingering kiss on the lips. Most normal people are totally creeped out by this behavior. When some express concern about what those kids might see or be subjected to the looneys call us sick. I guess that means they approve of this unnatural behavior between brother and sister so what does that say about them.

    Reply
  411. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    So true. It’s the sum total of all the abnormal behaviours of that family that have so many of us concerned about the welfare of those kids. The JP’s have been very public about their lives, their past behaviours, the kids, both in interviews and in photo ops. They sold themselves and their family to John Q. Public for fifteen minutes of fame and riches. So be it for Brad and Angie but those children could not make that decision, it was made for them. So we watch, wonder, and speculate, ever keeping them under the microscope in hopes it is a form of protection for those kids in that their parents know people are paying attention.@Guest2:

    Reply
  412. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 5:14 pm

    Sorry, my response was intended for UpTheCoast.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  413. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:01 pm

    @sinker:
    I also think she is using those children, and it’s disgusting that she’s been allowed to adopt so many children in such a short time, without being married, while she was (supposedly) pregnant/birthing children at the same time. I do believe that the reason that all of her children were born and adopted outside the U.S. is because of her documented mental issues. Just watching her acquire them and then decide who/what they were going to be….very female, very male, a little dude, a tomboy, etc…reeks of being mentally fucked up, imo. I’ve never heard a normal mother/parent LABEL their kids at 1-2 months old.

    Reply
  414. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:05 pm

    @rushdog:
    I thought so too!

    Reply
  415. joanne said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:05 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    At birth actually, Shiloh was dressed like a boy on people mag.

    Reply
  416. Dream said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:09 pm

    @Guest2:
    the way you treat others is more a reflection of how you feel about yourself than it is how u feel about the person your bashing. if u respect urself u show respect.

    Reply
  417. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:12 pm

    @Guest2:
    :lol: It takes some dedication and loyalty I guess…..to see that picture of Ange/James, and still try to defend her as being a normal sweet mommy :lol: If I ever saw pictures in mags and on the internet of my mom kissing my uncle like that…..I’d be mortified!!!

    Reply
  418. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Where is the CWLA when it comes to these children? Are they also starstruck? I would like to know more about the nannies they employ. Are they licensed or are they just glorified babysitters/housekeepers?

    Reply
  419. joanne said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:24 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Actually its scary to use that much vemon against people if you don’t agree with them. If they are not getting paid for this then they need some help.

    Reply
  420. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:28 pm

    @joanne:
    Yes, that’s right :( I was thinking about the twins…when they were barely 2-3 months old she was saying that Knox is a little dude…and Viv was very female :shock: Whatever the F that means. It sounded like she had looked in on them once or twice, and noticed the boy was wearing blue and the girl was wearing pink….and that was her description of them :lol:

    Reply
  421. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:37 pm

    @joanne:
    People do worse for money, I suppose ;)

    Reply
  422. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    @Dream:
    +1 :)

    Reply
  423. rushdog said on May 29th, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    @Guest2:
    The father’s at the core of the family history, imo. Wouldn’t have done any good to send the brother to the father, o.k. well maybe put a little distance into the situation, but the damage would have already been done much earlier in childhood. Father’s the core; brother and sister the outgrowth. I’d be pissed too if my father was ranting publicly when he was the cause. Her father can be a bit overly solicitous about her…is a red flag among others. Just my opinion. I have not been personally affected by a situation like this, it just makes sense to me. Thank you to ‘whatever’ who wrote of her uncle and others who have lost a child for sharing your pain. It moves me to read those posts.

    I have specific criticisms of AJ but won’t bash her completely because of this. I think it’s very real and, combined w/twisted HW, has left serious damages. Makes me want to puke.

    Reply
  424. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:07 pm

    They must seek out to employ those with zero integrity who will sell the well being of those little innocents for cold hard cash. Those kids are on their own…..and why am I thinking of The Lord Of The Flies?? Hellooooo Mad and Pax@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  425. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:24 pm

    When Angie publicly stated she was considering adoption for the first time, it was just a year after she had spent 72 hours in a psychiatric institution. One of the countries that doesn’t automatically exclude adopting a child because of mental-health issues is Cambodia. She adopted Maddox from there. Angie is one slick, manipulating person. Mad’s adoption had been arranged by Lauryn Galindo, and she personally brought Mad in from the Cambodian orphanage to Namibia where she delivered him to Angie. She was later exposed to be involved in a baby-buying scandal. Angie was quick to switch the public eye from her part in “buying” a baby from this woman to making a public statement that she and BBT were separating. BBT was well used by Angie: First to cover up the brother-lover scandal at the Oscars where members of the audience were heard to gasp when she kissed James so passionately, “She’s seriously effing her brother!”…..and secondly he was used as deflection to the exposure of Lauryn Galindo’s supposed involvement in baby selling to wealthy adoptee parents. Angie was never formally implicated in Galindo’s indictment which only concerned adoptions processed between 1997 and 1999, more than two years before she helped Angie obtain her son Maddox.

    There is so much more to be learned about this faux humanitarian and her manipulations…..so very much more. Ian wrote a book called Brangelina: The Untold Story, and Morton also wrote a book about them but his seemed to be more of an arse kissing to Angie than an actual expose’. Jennifer Paul wrote a Brangie book that was published in the UK, but never swam the pond to be available here. She now has an online gossip blog as well…

    Reply
  426. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:26 pm

    Brangelina: The Untold Story, by Ian Halperin, has quite a bit of information in it, but what I liked about it mostly was that it puts Angie’s life and events into chronological order so you get a better picture of the mind and manipulations of a psychopath as they grow up to adulthood. Angie was first diagnosed a psychopath in high school.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  427. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:50 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Patty, did I read somewhere that she is bohomoth?

    Reply
  428. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:53 pm

    @Guest2:
    PA, what I should have said is that I thought I read somewhere that she is boho, do you know if that’s correct? Tired tonight and ready to go to sleep..

    Reply
  429. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    That’s what I’ve heard as well….that she is BOHOMOTH@Guest2:

    Reply
  430. Patty Anne said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    I believe it was in a Chicago newspaper@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  431. Guest2 said on May 29th, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    Pic of aj, she has more eye wrinkles than I do and I’m a lot older than her. She’s aged so much in a few short years.

    http://www.justjared.com/photo-gallery/2668087/angelina-jolie-foreign-commonwealth-office-04/

    Reply
  432. janindisguise said on May 29th, 2012 at 9:25 pm

    @Guest2:
    Yes I know the Boho Grove is scary. You read what else goes on there, right? Anyhow, it took me a long time to go through everything a to z, beginning with how and why the traumatization/mind control takes place. Been going on for a while and the creators of it got slipped in here thru Operation Paperclip for their “wonderful” medical breakthroughs, mk’ing, etc. They are still here, having lived way beyond their years though, I’m sure, their medical information that has not been shared with the “sheeple”.

    I’m glad you went there. I forgot to say that if anyone here has been victimized, that site is full of triggers as the cautionary paragraph there reads. It took me years of babysteps to get through that sort of topic, as I was frightened at first. I am glad now though because everything, as betrayed as it made me feel, makes sense in the world.

    I guess that’s why I feel compassion for AJ and the lot of ‘em. They were victims from their beginnings, having come from that type of multigenerational family, including the BP fam. IMO.

    Reply
  433. IUCGuest said on May 29th, 2012 at 9:26 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    and Guest2 –

    Couple days late here, but I saw Dark Shadows this weekend and it’s plain as the nose on your face that Eva Green, AKA “Angie” Bouchard, is impersonating Jolie for at least part of the movie. “Angie” is constantly coming on to Depp’s character, Barnabas, but he’s in love with someone else. They have a bizarre supernatural sex scene, after which Barnabas says, “That was a regrettable experience.” Then he tells Angie that he has a weakness for living flesh, particularly hers, but he can’t ever get with her again. She says, “If I can’t have you, I’ll destroy you.” Depp’s had a couple of billion dollar film successes since The Tourist, but he’s been getting a lot of slamming by the same blog sites that used to love him. Work of Jolie, maybe paying people to try to destroy him in print? Depp’s character accuses Angie of making him a monster, turning everyone against him, and after that there’s a scene where the townspeople come to get the “monster,” and there are people in the crown who look exactly like Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes. There’s also dialogue where Angie threatens to drive his “little girlfriend” off a cliff – I wondered if that wasn’t in relation to those unflattering pics that came out around the time of the Tourist showing barefaced, boho-looking Vanessa juxtaposed against ones of Angie looking red carpet ready with the caption of “who do you think is prettier?” and of course the talk that Angie flirted with Depp in front of Vanessa.

    As for Ian’s post referencing “Child Welfare League of America,” didn’t one of the gossip sites report that Vanessa thought child services should investigate Jolie after visiting The Tourist set in Venice?

    Reply
  434. Up the Coast said on May 29th, 2012 at 10:44 pm

    I find it hard to read her words…she is an immature brat. She even admits that she doesn’t FEEL anything, like a normal person feels pain/pleasure/empathy. She admits herself to a mental hospital to what…get her way? To get BBT to marry her? Or because she is seriously messed up? So she’s either dangerously manipulative or mentally unstable…IDK, can she have it both ways? I think her father knows her better than anyone, but that’s just MHO. I don’t buy her BS at all.
    http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123685&page=1

    Reply
  435. Mama said on May 29th, 2012 at 11:22 pm

    I saw the pics from their family outing in the Galapagos and aside from being all around bizarre, there is one of AJ walking on the beach with her black gown and hat on while Vivienne is several feet away laying in the sand sleeping. What mom walks around a beach in a floor length gown while her toddler sleeps in the sand?!!! I find it hard to believe any nanny worth their salt could stand to watch this go on.

    Reply
  436. Tetta said on May 30th, 2012 at 7:03 am

    Ian´s new tweet says “the source”. In my eyes it looks like she sells ice cream. People in the street wears thin clothes and it´s dark outside. The source can´t be in London where the JP-family is said to be. It´s too cold there in the evenings to not wear a sweater or something else warm. The tweet is written in Florida. Could the source be in Florida or LA ? What is this tweet supposed to tell us ? That Ian´s sources are icecold and doesn´t know anything ?

    Reply
  437. Guest2 said on May 30th, 2012 at 7:52 am

    @Tetta:
    I don’t think it’s ice cream she’s selling. If you enlarge the photo it looks almost like jewelry on the table and the stand behind her. I don’t know what those tall things are on either side of the table. Ian is telling us something about his source but does it mean his source is in Miami or he’s in Miami and that’s where he took the photo. Maybe this clue is for aj more than us? She’s had her peeps herd trying to move the conversation away from the subject of the riddle.

    Reply
  438. Guest2 said on May 30th, 2012 at 7:53 am

    @Guest2:
    here, not herd…. :)

    Reply
  439. Idgie said on May 30th, 2012 at 10:03 am

    @Dream:

    I adopted from Vietnam. I can tell you it is absolutely not customary to pay people off, and it is not legal. My adoption agency was adament that we make them aware if anyone (Vietnamese officials, orphanage director ect.) ask us for any money. We were told that we have paid all of the fees neccessary for the adoption process and that no money should be exchanged in the country when we are there. When we were interviewed in Vietnam by US officials (you are required to have a private interview with US officials) they specifically asked us if anyone there asked us for money, if the child we are adopting is the same child we had been assigned to, were we able to walk around the orphanage, did we go to the orphanage……) The only gifts that were exchanged were small presents we brought for the orphage workers and orphanage director (this is customary). Nothing expensive, just a small gesture of thanks for attending to the children.

    Reply
  440. Tetta said on May 30th, 2012 at 10:49 am

    @Guest2:

    The only things we can say for sure is the photo is taken where it´s warm outside in the evenings. The source is sitting alone on a street in the evening / night and sells something. Is Angelina out in the streets nighttime selling herself ? If so, no surprise. She tries to sell herself as an actress and who knows what else she tries to sell. Brad ? The kids ? When I enlarged the photo the first time I thought it were papercups for ice-cream. Now I have enlarged it again and to me it´s impossible to see what the woman has on the table.Tubes with golfballs ? Rolled up posters ? The woman waves with her hand. Perhaps she tries to swepe the peeps away. Or she waves, saying “Hello Angelina !”. Or she is waving to us saying “you can never guess what Ian is telling you”. It would be fun if anyone knows what she sells. It possible doesn´t matter, but still, it could be interesting to know something. :(

    Reply
  441. joanne said on May 30th, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    @Tetta:
    My guess would be jewerly. Those tall things may be holding bracelets.

    Reply
  442. Up the Coast said on May 30th, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    @joanne:
    That’s what it looks like to me too.

    Reply
  443. rushdog said on May 30th, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    I can’t really see the twitter pic that well either. I don’t think AJ is selling herself of the streets, at least I hope not. Even if a mental illness causes that behavior to occur (because it can) she has enough people around her to make sure that doesn’t happen. Back in ‘09 “SR” was posting about AJ, “Bunny” and the f/u boots outside the door and I believe Bunny was a female prositute (Kate would remember for sure).

    Ian’s twitters in recent weeks have him in Miami then Chicago and back to Miami. He could be getting information from from a variety of sources “on the street” so to speak. Not sure where the dark haired dancer twitter pics fit into this, if at all.

    In June of 2011 is when Ian started posting the “Looks like Madre” (no look-a-like in this pic) riddles and he was also in Miami at that time. And the female “looks like madre” (who is too dark to be a product of sis/bro) appeared to be of mixed race, imo, just saying since there was some discussion of an AA and Hispanic female upthread somewhere.

    So Ian’s undercover gathering information about….lol, he gives us a lot of credit for being able to figure these things out.

    Reply
  444. rushdog said on May 30th, 2012 at 12:32 pm

    So is Ian getting information from the seller of jewelry? Hmmm….

    Reply
  445. Up the Coast said on May 30th, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    @rushdog:
    Maybe he’s talking to friends/relatives of the nannies? Those nannies have to talk to somebody!

    Reply
  446. Kate said on May 30th, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @rushdog:
    going into a meeting , but here is a little insight into Ian and this twittier, FWIW, “I would go to jail before I would out a source”. Quote. He always stands by his sources, he would never, ever, ever, ever, give them up, not even a hint of who they might be. Ever. Trust me on this..it might be the source, but it is not , his . ;)

    Reply
  447. Dream said on May 30th, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    @rushdog:
    maybe someone in her jewelry company?

    Reply
  448. Dream said on May 30th, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    btw how did we ever exist before cell phones?

    Reply
  449. Dream said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    @Kate:
    never read that before but i have always got that vibe from ian. he comes across like an old fashioned reporter. and that is a compliment, too many talking heads now instead of reporters. when ur not standing behind your own story, but one written by someone else, you don’t have to have integrity. and if your writing for someone else you don’t have to have morals because no one knows who wrote the story.

    Reply
  450. liv4 said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:09 pm

    Did you notice the woman in the street is pedaling her wares, jewelry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  451. iwasanon said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:30 pm

    I agree that Ian wouldn’t give up his sources. Just doesn’t make sense.

    As for the street cart. It’s looks like jewelry to me but could be scarves.

    Reply
  452. iwasanon said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:36 pm

    Another tweet from Ian “Who can it be now???” along with a pic of a woman sitting on a lounge chair by the pool.

    I wonder if it has anything to do with the Men at Work song “Who Can it Be Now?”

    Who can it be knocking at my door?
    Go ‘way, don’t come ’round here no more
    Can’t you see that it’s late at night?
    I’m very tired and I’m not feeling right

    All I wish is to be alone
    Stay away, don’t you invade my home
    Best off if you hang outside
    Don’t come in, I’ll only run and hide

    Who can it be now?
    Who can it be now?
    Who can it be now?
    Who can it be now?

    Who can it be knocking at my door?
    Make no sound, tip-toe across the floor
    If he hears, he’ll knock all day
    I’ll be trapped and here I’ll have to stay

    I’ve done no harm, I keep to myself
    There’s nothing wrong with my state of mental health
    I like it here with my childhood friend
    Here they come, those feelings again

    Who can it be now?
    Who can it be now?
    Who can it be now?
    Who can it be now?

    Is it the man come to take me away?
    Why do they follow me?
    It’s not the future that I can see
    It’s just my fantasy

    Oh, who can it be now? Who can it be now? Who can it be now? Who can it be now?
    Oh, who can it be now? Oh, yeah, who can it, who can it Oh, who can it be now? Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah

    Reply
  453. Up the Coast said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:46 pm

    @liv4:
    yes…just like Ange was doing at the museum ;)

    Reply
  454. Guest2 said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:48 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    That same thought crossed my mind!

    Reply
  455. Guest2 said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:50 pm

    @iwasanon:
    She’s with lefsetz and the whitecoats are coming to take her away?

    Reply
  456. Up the Coast said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Who can it be now? Cuz Ange is putting on another persona :roll: Or the men in white coats are on her tail?

    Reply
  457. Up the Coast said on May 30th, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    @Guest2:
    @Guest2:
    :lol:

    Reply
  458. Kate said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:02 pm

    @Dream:
    He has said that in several times , over the years while discussing his projects. Between the print, talk radio, and tv interviews I can’t point to exactly where, but he has been very vocal about it. He was challenged about using unnamed sources, and he stands by them. They may not be much help in a court of law for a murder conviction, but Deep Throat proved the value of remaining anonoymous. He has said in the past who a source is though, once they have signed off on the story. Angelinas drug dealer would be an example. Morton named her mothers best friend, Bill Day (who Angie met with for the first time after a decade during SALT) and he was working on his book. Morton named many, forgot to source Ian ( I am being kind with that statement) and his book took the adoptions into detail, including why and how Mad was brought to the US), but he whitewashed Angie in the end. It is fairly clear that Angelina gave up the early years and he gave her back everything post 2005.I don’t know how any fan of Angies could not have been happy with Mortons book, now James, and Brad, and Jen, yes, he was not as kind to them.

    Reply
  459. iwasanon said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:05 pm

    @Guest2:
    Or her other childhood “friend” was James and she’s telling Brad to stay away.
    Is this another sign she’s done with Brad.

    Reply
  460. Patty Anne said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:16 pm

    I think that is the message here. Remember her ego can not stand to take any hits, and this past year has been one consecutive failure after another for Angie who was once so well protected she was untouchable. It began with Mr. James Braddock’s plagiarism lawsuit that would not go away, the failure of ITLOBAH, becoming the laughing stock of the Oscars with RightLeg gate. Of course in her mind none of this is her fault, but those of others surrounding her. Brad would take the brunt since she began her fantasy life with him as her partner, but even the Faux Engagement failed to garner any interest. She’s scared she is now “losing it all”….the one thing she has said in interviews is her wish for her life: “I just want to keep everything I’ve not got”…..it’s going, and so is her sanity.@iwasanon:

    Reply
  461. Patty Anne said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:17 pm

    Correction: “I’ve NOW got”.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  462. Patty Anne said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:18 pm

    Why don’t we compile a list of Angelina Jolie’s failures this past year and see how they all add up? I had forgotten to mention The Tourist, but it did begin back then didn’t it?

    Reply
  463. Kate said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:25 pm

    @liv4:
    Lol her wares! I don’t know why that makes me laugh, it is sad really, that photo of her pimping her film this past week was sad, don’t you wonder what these mes “really” think of her, if they were honest . It is like a little girl that keeps trying to get daddys attention wearing her mothers high heels ans lipstick . I actually feel sorry for her.

    Reply
  464. WCKitty said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:39 pm

    @iwasanon:
    I’m not saying that Brad is with Angie, but Brad is in London according to a post at FF:
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=315011

    Is Angie currently in London, or is it Brad’s turn to be with the children? Or is he visiting….? Or does he have work there?

    Reply
  465. WCKitty said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:44 pm

    @Kate:
    Angie supposidly has three movies back-to-back and wedding plans are in chaos! :roll: So she is hawking her wares movie wise, through the UN, and the so-called wedding!

    Reply
  466. Dream said on May 30th, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @iwasanon:
    i think lefsetz was angies childhood friend

    Reply
  467. iwasanon said on May 30th, 2012 at 4:22 pm

    @Dream:
    I know. But her other childhood friend was James H.

    Reply
  468. joanne said on May 30th, 2012 at 4:34 pm

    @WCKitty:
    He needs burly body guards to buy a helmet and gloves? What a wimp.

    Reply
  469. iwasanon said on May 30th, 2012 at 4:35 pm

    @WCKitty:
    She just showed ITLOBAH to those politicians in London yesterday and Maleficent will film in London.
    Pitt has a supporting part coming up in The Counselor which is supposed to film in different places including London and LA.

    That article at FF you linked to says he was at a motorcycle shop in Ruislip which is northwest of London.
    They are staying at a house on the Wentworth Golf Course which is southwest of London. Is he really staying at Wentworth? Or could they be alternating staying with the kids at Wentworth?

    Reply
  470. WCKitty said on May 30th, 2012 at 5:02 pm

    @iwasanon:
    What is the distance between the two places? Is he hiding out someplace else and/or with someone else?

    Reply
  471. Dream said on May 30th, 2012 at 7:08 pm

    @iwasanon:
    lol i was jsut teasing and i was late to the party sorry.

    Reply
  472. Guest2 said on May 30th, 2012 at 7:39 pm

    @joanne:
    I was just reading that and thinking how strange that he needed two big black cars and burly body guards to go buy motorcyle gear. Is he a mobster now? Or does he need protection for some reason? I have to say that he looked clean and happy for a change.

    Reply
  473. Dream said on May 30th, 2012 at 8:12 pm

    @Guest2:
    well they did take all his guns away so body guards are probably a good idea lol.

    Reply
  474. Guest2 said on May 30th, 2012 at 8:17 pm

    Breaking news from the national enquirer, jen and angie are meeting in Lodnon to bury the hatchet. I hope this isn’t true, consider the source I guess.

    Reply
  475. Guest2 said on May 30th, 2012 at 8:22 pm

    @Dream:
    Lol, billy bob had to hide out after he broke up with her. Maybe the break up rumors are finally true and brad is just protecting himself. jk. or not.

    Reply
  476. Kate said on May 30th, 2012 at 8:24 pm

    @Guest2:
    Ha, how many times now? Is Heidi joining them this time? That at least would make it interesting. lol

    Reply
  477. Kate said on May 30th, 2012 at 8:32 pm

    According to him though, she took Mad, after she finished Beyond Borders and traveled the world, never kept in touch with him. The only way he knew what she was doing was reading about it or hearing it on the radio. When they finally met up around her birthday, she picked a fight with him intentionally, and ended it. It sounded like she used him to secure Madd, some.ce he initially went with her to adopt him. She was inviting chicks into their bed just a few months into this so call marriage that was the love of her life. Who knows what the truth is, but she was already sleeping with several others by that time according to what has been published.

    Reply
  478. Kate said on May 30th, 2012 at 8:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    Well who would notice him if he just came by on his bike like a regular bloke? lol. Wonder why he has packed up the baggy clothes? His new girl must not care for them.

    Reply
  479. Kate said on May 30th, 2012 at 8:46 pm

    I wonder if Brad ever thought it possible that when he became such a superstar, and he did that W shoot with Angelina , that it would come true to life for them, right down to the violence, the booze, and polyester suits? I bet not, as vain as actors are, he would have done something to fix his image, this is worse than the beaded beard. Is Lainey still obsessing over his butt, because I doubt he has much of one? Alcohol, drugs, that is not just stress and age. Imho

    Reply
  480. Dream said on May 31st, 2012 at 10:01 am

    @Guest2:
    lol

    Reply
  481. Guest2 said on May 31st, 2012 at 10:14 am

    I was just reading this and it pretty much reflects what I think of aj meeting with British officials and screening her movie for them. It’s probably what most here think as well. It’s good to see it in writing and know that others see it too. Why is she there? It just doesn’t make any logical sense to me.

    http://www.bohomoth.com/?p=6964

    Reply
  482. Idgie said on May 31st, 2012 at 10:22 am

    @Dream:

    I wrote a whole post on Vietnam adoption but i see it didn’t make it on the site or it was deleted for some reason. Anyway it is not customary to pay people in Vietnam concerning your adoption. If money is exchanged once you are in the country there is probably something illegal going on or someone is misusing their position…………………….

    Reply
  483. Guest2 said on May 31st, 2012 at 10:29 am

    I wish Ian would give us a riddle that addresses how this woman/poseur of limited education gains access to such powerful leaders in the world. It’s a total mystery to me and I’d like to know what goes on in the background that we don’t know about.

    Reply
  484. Patty Anne said on May 31st, 2012 at 11:01 am

    Twitter clue: More boney

    Boney James: Jazz musician. Newest CD out is “Contact”
    Mr James is a black man. Mentioning this because the recent clues showing a female/male of color

    Does Brad have a new significant other?

    Reply
  485. Patty Anne said on May 31st, 2012 at 11:07 am

    British officials have humiliated themselves by meeting with this woman on such an important issue. Is there anyone left on this planet who hasn’t read her quotes supporting her desires for S & M, rough sex, being tied down during? Ah, isn’t that like being raped? How insulting for all those assulted and raped as acts of war. Only to Jolie does this seems to be “making love”…..@Guest2:

    Reply
  486. Guest2 said on May 31st, 2012 at 11:27 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Exactly. And her movie was a Bosnian love story, not a documentary as someone at ff pointed out. So how and why does she get access to these powerful men? What’s the big, dirty secret? Someone should be looking into that.

    Reply
  487. Guest2 said on May 31st, 2012 at 11:32 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Well, he did look cleaned up at the motorcycle shop. That would explain the burly bodyguards and were they bullet proof cars, lol? Zahara’s nanny was quite attractive as I recall. Jk, don’t want the blog police descending on me.

    Reply
  488. SP said on May 31st, 2012 at 11:40 am

    I find it very interesting that she is over in London. I think a part of her has been getting jealous over the past year of Kate Middletons success and attention in the media. I think she is desparate to obtain that kind of attention and go “steal” the limelight away from her. Even down to how she dresses and does her hair. Now she has to hang out with London officials and play charitable women. Something to think about.

    Reply
  489. Up the Coast said on May 31st, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    EXACTLY!!!! :evil:

    Reply
  490. Up the Coast said on May 31st, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    @Guest2:
    :shock: Good Grief! She looks like death warmed over…that dress is so big/baggy on her. So is this her, attempting to “be” Diana now?

    Reply
  491. Patty Anne said on May 31st, 2012 at 12:50 pm

    Ah, I had forgotten Zahara’s nannygate thingie. Remember when the magazines were screaming Angie Catches Brad Making Love To Nanny? Oh yea. More likely scenario is a three-way that went wrong when Brad and Nanny decided to go it without Angie’s bone-picker frame.@Guest2:

    Reply
  492. Patty Anne said on May 31st, 2012 at 12:52 pm

    Yes it is. Huge, balloon sleeves, deep V-neckline showing her belly button ( well, nearly), those Whooping Crane legs, and sling-back, peep toe shoes. Did Zahara dress her mum in a darkened closet? If Angie was going for quiet, dignified dressing she failed. Even her RightLeg Gate would be better than this dowdy , granny nightgown look.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  493. Up the Coast said on May 31st, 2012 at 12:54 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  494. Up the Coast said on May 31st, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    Angelina says she hates being hugged, and she holds her breath when being hugged :( but she also says she would like to find the person (man or woman) who could hold her down and “put her on the bottom”. :shock: Freak!

    Reply
  495. janindisguise said on May 31st, 2012 at 3:33 pm

    Helleau!

    I saw that black, ill-fitting dress. Who suggested THAT? Oh God. Is this someone’s idea of British frump/business attire? So unfortunate – that dress and its fitting, or lack thereof!

    Other topic: anyone heard of Tavistock across the pond?

    Reply
  496. Up the Coast said on May 31st, 2012 at 8:14 pm

    @janindisguise:
    LOOK at the time on your post :shock:

    Reply
  497. Tetta said on May 31st, 2012 at 8:34 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    Now we know why Janid has a special interest in the Illuminati. This can not be by coincident !

    :lol:

    Reply
  498. Dream said on May 31st, 2012 at 9:31 pm

    is it just me or do jolies lips look like raw hamburger in the second picture down?
    http://www.bohomoth.com/?p=6964

    Reply
  499. Guest2 said on May 31st, 2012 at 9:43 pm

    Illuminati be damned. Jan is blessed.

    Biblical Significance of 333

    The number 3, 33, 333 are significant it is said that the holy trinity is three and that christ was crucified at the age of 33 but also that his vibration was 333. I too have awakened to the clock reading 3: 33 and gone directly into meditation and experienced a peace and an awareness that is unmatched by anything I have ever experienced on earth. So I feel that the person who keeps seeing 333 is a blessed individual indeed and should embrace these numbers rather than fear them. Let them serve as a reminder that christ is always with you even until the end of time.
    God Bless

    Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_333_mean_Biblically#ixzz1wV9zVCoP

    Reply
  500. Guest2 said on May 31st, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    @Dream:
    Raw hamburger looks better. Looks like the loons are alive and well at bohomoth’s site. Glad they deserted IUC.

    Reply
  501. Up the Coast said on May 31st, 2012 at 10:13 pm

    @Tetta:
    :lol:
    @Dream:
    I wonder if that is from the filler injections…it is gross looking.

    Reply
  502. elby said on May 31st, 2012 at 11:02 pm

    I am uncomfortable with attacking a very damaged person. Wish she could just tell the world the truth and heal. She is as sick as her secrets.

    Reply
  503. Dream said on May 31st, 2012 at 11:33 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    thats what i was wondering. it looks painful. i hope it heals soon.

    Reply
  504. sinker said on June 1st, 2012 at 11:30 am

    @elby:
    This post has really made me think. It is a variation on the nature nurture argument for me. I guess if I can boil it down, I can’t decide if she is truly deranged or arrogant (or both?) and each of these conditions calls forth a dramatically different range of emotions.

    There is a huge gray area when it comes to how people got where they are. I do think AJ was born organically messed up (chemical imbalance / brain of a sociopath, or “born wrong” as my aunt used to say) and I do think her family was messed up as well. I have a ton of empathy/sympathy for most human beings once I hear their full story. Sometimes something happens that makes me cross the line and just think “he/she is now choosing to be bad person” or consciously do something they know is wrong. With AJ, the day I found out the details about the adoption of Maddox, I thought, wow, she’s kinda evil maybe. Then when I saw the video of her talking about torturing (IMO) her pets, that was it for me.

    In the 90’s, early 00’s, because she was beautiful and rich and famous, the entertainment industry and HW and the media pretty much applauded her every move and loved her for making some headlines for doing stuff from wearing a vial of blood around her neck and playing with knives to adopting orphans. For a sociopath-type person, who learns to measure right/wrong using cues from the people around them, maybe the validation is “i guess if everyone else thinks I’m awesome then I must be.” Kind of like mob mentality.

    I know from repeated personal experience that some people think it is just too much trouble to truly analyze themselves and will choose do wrong especially if they think they can get away with it. It is the getting away with it that drives them forward. I get that feeling from AJ. She will do whatever she can get away with and justify it the same way. They let me get away with it, so it must not be wrong.

    However, at some point, if you are sane person, you should be capable of doing a “moral inventory” and examine your motivations thoroughly when it comes to something like adopting a child from Cambodia and my gut tells me she did it because she thought it was cool and would make people talk about her more.

    Reply
  505. rushdog said on June 1st, 2012 at 11:56 am

    If anyone is interested, I just made five posts on the “inside thread” which are my guesses to the last four riddles.

    Reply
  506. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    @sinker:
    Nicely said….and I agree with you. Ange has always said/done outrageous things for attention, she has no boundaries, so she will do whatever it takes to get what she wants, no matter who she hurts.

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Is-Angelina-Jolie-Working-Voodoo-On-Brad-Pitt-12005.shtml

    http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/2005/11/angelina-jolie-is-black-magical.html

    Reply
  507. elby said on June 1st, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    @sinker:
    excellent point, sinker

    Reply
  508. sinker said on June 1st, 2012 at 12:52 pm

    @rushdog:
    Just read your posts and unfortunately I am still not connecting the dots. In my defense, it has been a loooooong week. Any chance i can talk you into summarizing in a non-clue list format? maybe in a little “once upon a time” type narrative? : )))

    Reply
  509. Liz E. said on June 1st, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    @Idgie:

    There are fees involved with Vietnamese adoptions as there are with any intercountry adoptions. Processing and other fees like any govt would charge for their services and document preparation. Payments are even allowed to birth mothers and families if they are not used to induce or influence the adoption process.

    There are prohibited payments and allowable payments. The following will give you an idea of what is allowed.
    The Code of Federal Regulations
    Title 8: Aliens and Nationality
    PART 204—IMMIGRANT PETITIONS
    Subpart C—Intercountry Adoption of a Convention Adoptee
    § 204.304 Improper inducement prohibited.

    http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&rgn=div5&view=text&node=8:1.0.1.2.8&idno=8#8:1.0.1.2.8.3.1.12

    As for the screening of Blood and Honey – a movie right on point of the announced UK initiative against rape as weapon of war, it certainly made sense to me that it was shown. There are many movies that illuminate an issue and educate without being documentaries. Schindler’s List, The Killing Fields, The Accused, Silkwood, and on and on.

    Reply
  510. rushdog said on June 1st, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    @sinker:
    Lol, I guess I understand what I’m thinking!!! In a quick nutshell, imo according to the riddles she’s been active in her extracurricular activities and not careful. Activities w/someone else (maybe more than one) and possibly her brother. And for some inexplicable reason there’s evidence of this on her brother’s computer which “crashed” (imput computer virus; output data, which was done by IT software persons) in Texas when JH was filming there in the spring of 2011. The Brand must have gotten something via UPS in January, I would say graphically notifying them of the theft (this is represented in the 1/24/12 and 4/13/12 riddle posts). The riddle suggests that she threatened to leak information about BP (which is consistent w/the March riddles) to get him to agree to her way of redirecting the media’s attention away from finding out about this. Her way was the engagement or what I think was actually just supposed to be a commercial or ad (PHOTO OP) to suggest they might be getting married and start the tab headlines blaring. Something got mixed up. The media thought it was an engagement because of the jeweler and so the manager then confirmed it on Friday the 13th as a “promise for the future.” The tactic was not as successful as hoped, lol, and now they’re stuck trying to deal with the possible public fallout and doing so in a “lifeboat” with her brother, who is largely responsible for the mess in the first place. The Brand loved their perceived life and all the attention until the “crashed” computer and now they want to be as unseen as possible.

    They are in London, as planned, and I’m guessing will be low key with a ‘conservative family values’ -type approach (so far that’s the way it’s been) while they determine what information was taken, how much and how and if it can be retrieved. This riddles suggests it’s information (photos, video and probably e-mails and documents) at mimimum about the “family business” and Carmelo which suggests to me it’s primarily about her and not him. The information also may include something about the miscarriage clued at the beginning of the Texas riddle. It’s not like this is a bunch of photograph negatives, it’s digital and from the Texas riddle “major announcement” Ian appears to be suggesting there’s a lot of material.

    The final riddle appears to be telling us why she wasn’t at Cannes. As a punishment for the engagement debacle he left her at the last minute (passive/agressive) and went alone (appearing much more relaxed I might add and imo). They are trying to protect the children from any possible fallout from whatever was on the computer w/brother and sister. Any parent can deal with an infidelity issue but the other….yikes, big problem.

    This is a description of my posts on the lovetolove thread and just my opinion on the solutions to the last four riddles Ian posted.

    Reply
  511. iwasanon said on June 1st, 2012 at 2:57 pm

    LOL at lumping ITLOBAH with those movies.
    Perhaps the best way to illuminate an issue and educate without being a documentary is to make a good movie that people will pay to see. The work speaks for itself.

    Schindler’s List – $345M 1993 ($549M infl adj)
    The Killing Fields – $34.7M 1984 ($77M infl adj)
    The Accused – $32M 1988 ($62M infl adj)
    Silkwood – $35.6M 1983 ($82M infl adj)
    ITLOBAH – $303K

    They obviously used Jolie just to get some press for their initiative. Someone in that foreign office took a few media PR classes.
    It may backfire on them if they are not taken seriously. I wonder how much that shindig cost out of the 20M pounds there were funded. (And I wonder if they had to pay for Jolie’s film to be shown or if Jolie paid them, or if she made a little donation, just so she could get more PR).
    There are plenty of people doing real work on that subject who could have addressed that group.

    Reply
  512. Dream said on June 1st, 2012 at 3:11 pm

    http://www.aol.com/video/rewind-angelina-jolie-surprised-by-her-father/517384426/?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl5|sec3_lnk2%26pLid%3D166101
    wow angie looks like jh clone here.

    Reply
  513. joanne said on June 1st, 2012 at 3:11 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Nothing like an anal rape/love story to get the message across about violence against women.
    Whoever approved this nonsense needs to get their head examined.

    Reply
  514. iwasanon said on June 1st, 2012 at 3:26 pm

    @joanne:

    It’s kind of funny that they used Jolie (a UN rep) while dissing the UN

    British officials said the aim of the UK initiative was to support the work of Wallstrom’s offices and local law enforcement, while allowing the UK to act on its own where it believes it can offer specific expertise in collecting forensic evidence, victim testimonies and eye-witness statements of a standard that would be admissible in court.

    Shuna Kennedy, the head of a London-based advocacy group, Womankind Worldwide, gave the Hague initiative a guarded welcome last night, warning of the dangers of duplication of effort.

    “The UN do a good job on this, but the thing about these horrific crimes is that you can always do more,” a British official said.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/may/29/uk-rape-investigation-squad-war

    Reply
  515. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Wow…it’s obvious you think very highly of Ms Voight, but to lower these films down to the level of her little porn flick? I don’t think so. Her many comments, in the past, about looking for and needing someone (male or female) to hold her down/dominate her, put her on the bottom, during sex…makes a complete mockery of this politically fueled enterprise, imo.

    Reply
  516. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 3:37 pm

    @joanne:
    :cry: seriously?

    Reply
  517. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Is she playing both sides of the field here? It wouldn’t surprise me…whatever she has to do, to get attention.

    Reply
  518. janindisguise said on June 1st, 2012 at 4:38 pm

    @Dream:
    Yes. She does. The eyes. Wooo.

    Thanks for the 333 contribution Dream and UTC.

    13 is a big Illum. number. AJ even has it on her arm. = the 13 illum families me thinks. They are sooo special. Pfft.

    Reply
  519. sinker said on June 1st, 2012 at 4:39 pm

    @rushdog:

    THANKS SO VERY MUCH for summarizing this for me!!!! it certainly all fits together very nicely and makes a ton of sense.

    so all that is left is for HRH to hop in here and give a little encouragement : )

    Reply
  520. janindisguise said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:24 pm

    Where is AJ today? Could she be at the “secret” Bildeberger meeting at Chantilly, VA? It’s being covered live by Alex Jones and World Net Daily as well. Bet the “big boys” hate that. Anyhow, ya think she’s there in the meeting?

    Reply
  521. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:28 pm

    Have you seen Ian´s new tweet ? “Brown eye girl – Big Clue “. When I click on the link to the photo, there isn´t any. I get a 404 error message. And I haven´t spelled the title wrong, it should be “eye”.

    Reply
  522. iwasanon said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:39 pm

    @Tetta:
    Try again. That sometimes happens. Or forget the link just click on the “view photo”

    Reply
  523. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:39 pm

    @Tetta:
    Maybe Ian is also saying that the internet is being scrubbed of old info ;) And the brown eye could mean she’s full of sh*t :lol:

    Reply
  524. iwasanon said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:40 pm

    @rushdog:
    Yes, thanks for the summary.

    Reply
  525. payal said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:46 pm

    there are new pics of jen on FF, she looks tired and a bit down recently. i wonder if she did get really ill and is still feeling the effects, i hope she feeling better, i wonder what kind of virus she got. ian any info on her?

    Reply
  526. Patty Anne said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:51 pm

    So sorry UTC, but when I read that clue all I could think of is , “Angie’s Milkshakes”……barf, barf@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  527. Patty Anne said on June 1st, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    Funny thing now most posts about Brad Pitt loves Angie’s banana milkshakes are ….File Not Found….lol So I tried a Google and found this. Seems her banana milkshakes are as much to laugh at as her RightLeg at the Oscars….

    ” Tuesday, April 3, 2012
    Angelina Jolie Fact Of The Week
    Angelina Jolie’s milkshake brings all the boys to the yard, where she, being a large trap-door spider, lunges out and drags them to their doom. “@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  528. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:01 pm

    Ian has a new tweet. “Brown eye girl – Big Clue”. When i click on the link in hope to see a picture, I get an error message 404 and no picture.

    Reply
  529. Patty Anne said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:04 pm

    Well, the sweeper has been at it again. The entire thread of “Jolie’s Milkshake” has been deleted from FF, and seems to have vanished from the Internet. Very interesting. @Patty Anne:

    Reply
  530. AmaryEllis said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:08 pm

    Pics of Jen from today – not pregnant
    http://www.justjared.com/photo-gallery/2669201/jennifer-aniston-gym-west-hollywood-03/

    Reply
  531. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:28 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    ugh! :(

    Reply
  532. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:28 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  533. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:30 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    She could be getting some physical therapy for her knee.

    Reply
  534. Dream said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:50 pm

    @Tetta:
    i have seen ian do that before. i wonder if its to give us a clue we recognize with out making it come up in a random search.

    Reply
  535. Dream said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:53 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    there was a post some where i think ff about jolie having brown eyes are being so high she is only pupils because the blue eyed people around her look blue eyed.
    if i am reiterating sorry ahve had a busy day and not read all yet

    Reply
  536. blip said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:57 pm

    SHOP WORKERS in Ruislip Manor were left slack jawed yesterday when Hollywood legend Brad Pitt strolled in.

    The Academy Award winning actor called into HGB Motorcycles, Park Way, on Wednesday afternoon (30).

    He was apparently killing time and picking up some bits and pieces while fiancee Angelina Jolie was filming at Pinewood Studios near Iver Heath.

    He chatted to staff, posed for photos, and bought a helmet and some gloves.

    Boss Dave Connell said: “Two guys came in first and said someone famous is going to come in now.

    “And then in walked Brad Pitt.

    “He was really friendly, and we were chatting about what he was up to and how he was getting on in England.”

    The superstar recently moved to Richmond with Angelina and their six children.

    Richard Maguire, who runs neighbouring shop Ruislip Tyres, happened to pop over to the shop when the A-lister was browsing.

    He said: “He was really friendly. It was a bit scary asking him for picture but he was really happy to do it.

    “I called my girlfriend over but didn’t tell her who it was and when she saw him she was dumbstruck.”
    http://www.uxbridgegazett…ruislip-113046-31084894/

    Reply
  537. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:58 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    If Ian means AJ is full of shit and let us know that in a Big Clue he can´t make any better clues.
    :lo: :lol: :lol:

    Reply
  538. Patty Anne said on June 1st, 2012 at 6:59 pm

    https://p.twimg.com/AuUgsa4CEAAkwjk.jpg
    Here you are Tetta, the photo for Brown Eye Girl that Ian Tweeted. It’s a dark girl sitting at a table texting I believe.@Tetta:

    Reply
  539. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 7:06 pm

    If Brown Eye has something to do with the computer hack/ leak and its a Big Clue about AJ and JH it must be a catastrophe.

    Reply
  540. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 7:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    It says error 404

    Reply
  541. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 7:32 pm

    @Tetta:
    Some things just go without saying ;) :lol:

    Reply
  542. Togi said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:10 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I’m copying my response from the flip side … Just my 2 cents’ worth on this one and I’m breaking it down pretty simply. Brown Eyed Girl is a Korean girl band commonly known as B.E.G. or “beg.” The 404 error message is used when a link has been broken, when the result you’re looking for no longer exists. So, it sounds to me like HRH is speaking to AJ, telling her that the media result she’s looking for no longer exists. She now needs to BEG. lol

    Reply
  543. iwasanon said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:17 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    @Tetta:

    I see the one Patty Anne posted and I see the one on Ian’s twitter. Tetta, did you try the “view photo” as I posted above?

    Reply
  544. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:21 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Thank You Patty Anne but the photo isn´t there. It could be different in different areas of the world so that could explain it. I guess you all know we are puritans in Sweden so we are not allowed to read too advanced texts or photos :lol:

    Reply
  545. Guest2 said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:24 pm

    @payal:
    I saw the pics and I thought she looked thinner but still fabulous.

    Reply
  546. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:24 pm

    @iwasanon:

    There is no “view photo” there! I know it use to be there but not here.

    Reply
  547. Guest2 said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:29 pm

    @Tetta:
    Tetta, here is the link to the twitter photo. Maybe it will work this way.

    http://twitter.com/IanUnderCover/status/208608905239072770/photo/1

    Reply
  548. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    @Togi:
    :) That’s a good guess…the link is still broken for me too!

    Reply
  549. Patty Anne said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:48 pm

    Hmmmmmm, I just checked on the link I posted which is from Ian’s twitter page, but here when I click on it I get the 404 message. Could that be related to all the cleaning someone is doing in Angie’s behalf on the Internet? Check out some of the older stuff that is not very flattering to someone who represents the UNHCR and you will find most of it has now got 404 on it. Could be this IS ian’s message….Angie and James are cleaning up their mess before it hits the fanns (pun?). Since these tweeted clues are all with this riddle it has to be about Angie and Jamie…..good grief, what a tangled web they have woven.

    Reply
  550. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    This is what I’m thinking too. It could be for many reasons……one could be because Maddox came across some things his mommy didn’t want to explain :shock:

    Reply
  551. Guest2 said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    African Americans are recurring clues and now brown eye girl with a picture of a dark skinned woman with black hair is a big clue. Maybe brad has a new girlfriend and that’s why angie didn’t show up at cannes. It could also be the reason for her leg bomb at the oscars. She’s no longer the #1 woman in his life? He looked happy and relaxed at cannes and he looked cleaned up and relaxed in the motorcyce shop.

    Reply
  552. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:56 pm

    @Guest2:
    Thank You ! But it doesn´t help, no photo. Their cleaning company must be very effective. I ought to hire them too! :)

    Reply
  553. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    He did look happy and relaxed at Cannes.

    Reply
  554. Guest2 said on June 1st, 2012 at 8:59 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I don’t get the error message in any of the links to the photo.

    Reply
  555. Guest2 said on June 1st, 2012 at 9:07 pm

    @Guest2:
    Oops, I was laughing at Tetta’s comment and posted my comment too soon. Even though I get the photo and not an error message I think Patty Anne is right that jh/aj are cleaning up.

    My other thought about the twitter clue is that maybe they are adopting another brown eyed girl. Or maybe something to do with the mother of one of the adopteds. They seem to be cleaning up ther act lately and the children haven’t been put on display in weeks. The beach tent photos are the last I remember seeing them.

    Reply
  556. joanne said on June 1st, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    sarcasm. :)

    Reply
  557. Guest2 said on June 1st, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    @Guest2:
    And lize has spent a lot of time trying to dispute that there were any improprieties in the other adoptions. For the sake of any future victims I hope I’m way off base on another adoption.

    Reply
  558. Tetta said on June 1st, 2012 at 9:14 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Ian says “gone and never coming back” and “sealing the abyss gate”. This could mean the web is cleaned from improper photos and that they are never coming back. After that they have sealed the abyss gate.

    Reply
  559. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 9:26 pm

    @joanne:
    I knew that :lol:

    Reply
  560. Up the Coast said on June 1st, 2012 at 9:35 pm

    @Tetta:
    What about our memories? :shock:

    Reply
  561. Quiet1 said on June 1st, 2012 at 9:50 pm

    @janindisguise ~ She’s not there.
    Vigilant Citizen has their attendance roster. I think she’s not quite think tank/policy making material. .
    Bilderberg 2012: The Official Attendees List | The Vigilant Citizen
    John Kerry, the Gov of Indiana, Google, Linked-In, Dow, CFR, Goldman Sachs.

    She’s rarely this quiet with the child PR moves and Brad has made all of his solo and smiling. Missing the narcissistic high of Cannes red carpet…all this points to some kind of shift in their dynamic. Brad maybe has the upper hand. If

    Reply
  562. iwasanon said on June 1st, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    This 404 from twitter pics is a twitter problem. Twitter support says
    “We’re aware and working to resolve.”

    https://dev.twitter.com/discussions/8243

    Reply
  563. Liz E. said on June 1st, 2012 at 10:50 pm

    “Shuna Kennedy, the head of a London-based advocacy group, Womankind Worldwide, gave the Hague initiative a guarded welcome last night, warning of the dangers of duplication of effort.”

    Just typical territorial comments. There is only so much money to go around and NGOs can be very protective of their funding sources. I understand his fear but the UK initiative is the kind of government intervention people have been clamoring for.

    Reply
  564. iwasanon said on June 1st, 2012 at 11:13 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Could be typical territorial comments or it could be a duplication of effort. I would have to be one of the main players in order to know which it is.
    How are you involved that you are sure it’s territorial comments?
    Also who exactly has been clamoring for it?

    Reply
  565. Tetta said on June 2nd, 2012 at 6:02 am

    @Up the Coast:

    If there are no photos left of the siblings kissing each other there are no evidence it has happened. It´s like in court, without evidence no punishment.

    Perhaps this cleaning effort is because of the children. Maddox is old enough to read and understand what he sees on the web. It isn´t necessary black mail or Angelina´s career they try to safe. Poor kids. What will they think when all of them stumble over these photos on the web,
    There are so many photos and articles about AJ and JH so it must be impossible to erase all of them. And the photos of Brad and Angelina drunk or drugged. The cleaning company must work hard for their money.

    Reply
  566. Siska said on June 2nd, 2012 at 6:19 am

    @AmaryEllis:
    Jen look so great!,,she is Not pregnant,.i always think she is already not so keen on the kids front..she might adopt or surrogate ..but will not get pregnant…it’s too risky for her age ( and if the rumor that she was miscarriage twice when with Bp..)”" it’s more sense if she will not try that route again.

    I am wonder though…her usual bodyguard the bald one..seem being replace by the new one…m,mm..maybe has some disagreement with Jtx? My soap opera radar is on..he..he

    Reply
  567. Siska said on June 2nd, 2012 at 6:23 am

    I wonder if Jen will attend the MTV award? I am missing her new pictures so badly..he..he..
    I hope she will be jtx ‘partner on the Rock of ages premiere..

    Reply
  568. Guest2 said on June 2nd, 2012 at 8:28 am

    @Siska:
    In the last two sets of pics (the restaurant and the gym) she looked sad to me. I wonder if she isn’t feeling well or if something else is going on. She looked thinner (and really good) in the gym pics. I also wonder why jtx accompanies her to most of business events but she never goes to his. I also thought that jtx had that douchey look he had pre-jen in the recent pix of him at the glamour event. He doesn’t look like that when he’s with her. Just rambling…

    Reply
  569. payal said on June 2nd, 2012 at 10:29 am

    @Guest2:

    word for word my thoughts!

    Reply
  570. guest2 said on June 2nd, 2012 at 12:50 pm

    One of the ff girls thought she might be upset because the paps have been staking out her new home and following her. I hope that’s all it is.

    Reply
  571. Guest1 said on June 2nd, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Of all the movies you listed, ITLOBAH was the only one referred to as a ROMANCE/drama/war movie. Schindler’s List is listed as a biography/drama/history movie, Silkwood as a biography/drama/thriller, The Accused as a crime/drama, and The Killing Fields as a drama/history/war film. I just find it inappropriate to use a romance movie to showcase the UK initiative against rape as a weapon of war.

    Reply
  572. joanne said on June 2nd, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @Guest1:
    Very inappropiate.

    Reply
  573. Patty Anne said on June 2nd, 2012 at 2:28 pm

    As well as arrogant, insulting and inconsiderate of those who were raped during the war. Have the Hague Innitiative forgotten there were children born of those war crime rapes? @joanne:

    Reply
  574. Patty Anne said on June 2nd, 2012 at 2:28 pm

    Romance? Only to Angelina Jolie.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  575. Dream said on June 2nd, 2012 at 2:58 pm

    lol zombie romney

    Reply
  576. Tetta said on June 2nd, 2012 at 3:46 pm

    Finally I can see the photo attached to Ian´s tweet “Brown eye girl”. To see it better I enlarged it. There is a girl / woman who can be anything between 15 and 25 years old. The shape of her face looks like a cloon of JH´s face. Her squared shaped shoulders reminds a lot of AJ´s body. And her lips seem to be real big. I would be grateful if somebody else also wants to enlarge the photo and tell us if I´m right or wrong. The photo looks familiar. Has Ian used it before ? Or has Ian showed us a photo of the same person. It´s Ian´s word “cloon” and “Brotherly love” that makes me think in this direction.

    Reply
  577. Idgie said on June 2nd, 2012 at 5:49 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Like I said in my post, I adopted from Vietnam. I was told by govt. officials and my own adoption agency that we should not be giving ANY money to any “official” in Vietnam. The reason for this is to make sure that nothing illegal is going on. That is why we were told that No One, No One at all should be asking us for money. Yes, we were told that the family may ask us for money if they decide to attend the giving and receiving ceremony. We were told by our agency not to as much as we may want to they highly discouraged it. Any money needed for the Vietnemese Govt paperwork, documentation ect. was all paid up front. One of the couples that was with us brought baby clothes, toys and shoes to the orphanage, that was fine. Any money that exchanges hands can be seen as a bribe or worse yet illegal baby buying. All I can say is that my agency could not stress enough that No One, absolutely No One should be asking us for money. Not sure if this has changed since i adopted several years ago but I do know that my agency was very strict on the money issue. All I can say is that besides paying for our hotel, food and small fees such as getting her passport to travel we did not shell out any cash.
    I do not know the law on donating large sums of cash to an orphanage, strictly as a donation…..

    Reply
  578. Dream said on June 2nd, 2012 at 6:01 pm

    LAINEY’S GOSSIP 09/05
    The Fearless Flamer and the Locker Room Staredown: Gossip, conjecture, rumour – my lawyer would want me to remind you of those 3 beautiful words when considering the report below. And fair enough, certain celebrities are a lot more vicious than others, especially when protecting their inside gay… you know what I mean? Again… gossip, rumour, conjecture…bullsh*t… blah blah blah! And in the interest of protecting those who can be harmed by the Fearless Flamer, and since I am nothing if not a cowardly little bitch, let’s use superfun, supereasy code names. Trust me, don’t even bother emailing me afterwards. YOU KNOW the answer… I promise. The scene: Toronto. An elite celebrity, an internationally recognised married celebrity, a BIG BIG name is in town shooting a movie. We’ll call him the Flying Star. The Flying Star spends time relaxing and working out – so to speak – at an exclusive, private health club that offers members access to a full range of amenities, good enough for the rich, good enough for the famous. Two incidents… The first: another club member, a very goodlooking man I’ve named Daniel, finishes his work out, showers, puts a towel around his waist, heads back to the locker room, and notices a portly man staring at him. It is, of course, the Flying Star. Daniel is a nice fellow so he obliges the Flying Star in some idle chitchat, becoming increasingly uncomfortable under the heavy weight of the Flying Star’s heavy-lidded gaze, an appreciative gaze, as the conversation progresses, even though Danny is not one to read to the National Enquirer, or any of the blogs, least of all mine, meaning he had no advance knowledge of the Flying Star’s legendary leanings. And yet he knew that the Flying Star was ‘going there’ but did his best to ignore his gaydar… until the question came… Flying Star: Do you like to sauna? Daniel: errr… ahem… yeah… sure… Flying Star: Wanna go to the sauna with me? And this was not a football sauna invitation – like cracking knuckles and drinking beer and picking your nose…it was the kind of invitation George Michael would accept – you know what I mean? Now being a straight man, Daniel was obviously scared sh*tless. However, since he was raised with class and good manners, Daniel graciously declined and hightailed it outta there because as my husband says – ‘being polite is one thing but I don’t have to get naked to be polite.’ Words to live by, non? Anyway, that’s a pretty innocent encounter when you take it on its own…but when you consider that there have been multiple occurrences in the same club, you begin to wonder if the Flying Star is running a little short on Martian Medication, great for making babies and suppressing gays. The second incident is as follows: Still at the club – our victim is a well toned male massage therapist I’ll call Antony. Antony knew that he’d be assigned to the Flying Star – and who hasn’t heard of the Flying Star??? As such, he was thrilled, couldn’t wait…poor sod didn’t know what was coming. The day of the appointment arrives, Antony asks the Flying Star which body parts to focus on (a common question during massage therapy, nothing smutty there), and the Flying Star replied that he was doing a lot of dancing in his new movie and needed a full body, including ‘glutes, stomach, and groin’. So far so good. Antony begins to work, makes small talk, talks about his job, his aspirations, turns out his dream job is actually a fiery role the Flying Star took on not too long ago. Everything’s all good, progressing normally, and then the Flying Star starts chatting about himself…said he’d been married for more than 10, less than 20 years, and of course Antony (being a man with traditional values etc) is very, very moved, and tells him so, for a Hollywood player to remain committed for so long in this day and age, he’s even more impressed than ever before. Then the Flying Star’s face took on a ‘weird’ expression…his eyes didn’t move from Antony’s face. At this point, he asked Antony to massage his stomach and Antony obliged. But then the sheet ’slipped’ off, and since the Flying Star was not wearing underwear, Antony was treated to the Flying Star’s standing excitement, and Antony quickly pulled the sheet back up, and all the while, the Flying Star kept smiling, kept staring. Next thing you know, the sheet ’slipped’ again…Antony’s starting to freak out at this point, sweating, uneasy – he pulls the sheet back up again, to no avail because wouldn’t you know it, the sheet ’slipped’ again …for the third time!!!, And so Antony did what any straight, harassed man, powerless and faced with a million dollar c*ck would do… he made up a girlfriend and started yammerin’ on about her incessantly, but the Flying Star would not be deterred. He next wanted to know what part of the body Antony preferred to massage and a flustered Antony quickly replied – The Back! Thank Goddess the hour was up, Antony beat a hasty retreat, and went off to the locker room to regain his composure. He took a shower, wrapped a towel around his waste, and proceeded to the sink, foamed his face, and began to shave. Unfortunately, the Flying Star seemed to materialise out of a disco ball and ambushed our poor Antony. He complimented Antony on his beautiful physique, he admired Antony’s ‘cute’ness, he lamented his own loneliness in Toronto, and all the while, Antony can’t shave fast enough, nicking himself several times in the process, finally extracting himself from the Flying Star’s lechery, resorting to changing in the bathroom stall to escape any more advances. Oh…and one more thing…the Flying Star didn’t leave a tip. Seriously…what is this dude’s thing with massage therapy? And why on earth is he getting so bold??? John Travolta

    the more things change the more they stay the same lol

    Reply
  579. Idgie said on June 2nd, 2012 at 6:04 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Of course there are fees. However, all of the fees including paperwork translation (English to Vietnemese and Vietnemese to English) are paid ahead of time, before you leave to get your child. All fees including the orpahanage fee are paid ahead of time. All of the adoption paperwork is done before you leave. Once there you will sign some paperwork but you do not pay anyone. You will have to pay for your babies passport, and the cost of the medical checkup, hotel food………….but all of the adoption fees including home study, orphanage fee, translation, docement fees are done before you even leave for the country. Don’t know about other countries this is just my personal experience for Vietnam

    Reply
  580. Guest1 said on June 2nd, 2012 at 7:48 pm

    @Dream:
    The other night there was an ad on TV for a movie called “Savages”. The cast includes Blake Lively, Salma Hayek, Benicio Del Toro and John Travolta. The release date is July 6 so I would imagine they will be promoting the film soon. I wonder if JT will be promoting it, and if he will be at the premiere.

    Reply
  581. rushdog said on June 2nd, 2012 at 9:15 pm

    Well the latest tweet is “Branding” with a pic of Van Gogh vodka. The vodka is described as the best in the world. Van Gogh indulged in alcohol, coffee and cigarettes constantly. I wonder if this is to describe the current state of The Brand. I’d probably be the same if Texas 1464 is what I suggested and hanging out there as a possible breaking news story. The situation must not be resolving itself :) .

    Reply
  582. joanne said on June 2nd, 2012 at 9:23 pm

    @Dream:
    I read a few times that Travolta was a good tipper and a nice guy. I would say these guys knew the score but wanted some big bucks.

    Reply
  583. Guest19 said on June 2nd, 2012 at 10:16 pm

    Well if a news journalist is to be believed supposedly Jen is set to walk the red carpet with Justin tomorrow. I don’t think she looks sad, maybe just annoyed with the paps following her every damn move. As for her accompany JT in his events there really hasn’t been any event that has required Jen to attend. The recent event for Julianne Hough was only for 40 guests which were close friends and family and obviously the rock of ages cast since that is believed to be her big break. If she doesn’t attend the Rock of Ages premiere then I could also question it, but as for now I don’t see it as a big deal. JMO of course.

    Reply
  584. Guest19 said on June 2nd, 2012 at 10:18 pm

    I also don’t think you can tell whether she is sad or not from the restaurant pics since we can’t even see her face.

    Reply
  585. Siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:12 am

    @Guest2: I think .jen usually only attend when she has to..she will not walk the red carpet,because it’s not her event..she didn’t like to stole people thunder..
    I forth ink Jen look normal..she will not pose happily when they took her picture on her private time,,when he promote her movie.she will pose for them happily.
    Regarding Jtx..it’s always his style..he never change just because of Jen..they might influence each other but not much..I never think he is douche..he never spoke bad publicly about is ex..I judge people basic on what they did to others..not because of his appearance ..remember Bp physical apperance like a gentleman,but I think his behavior toward Jen and his partner,deserved to be label deuche…

    Reply
  586. Siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:18 am

    I think when there are more than to incident about this person…it’s not really the victim fault…if a woman being treat this way..we already knew and scream its sexual harassment…but when a man is the victim and the proprietor is a famous man,the victim being judge harshly..
    I knew you like him..but it’s so obvious about this person,even my gay friend heard about this when he was lived temporary in Canada..there is no secret..already well known fact…@joanne:

    Reply
  587. Siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:20 am

    Sorry for misspelling..the auto correct..really going overboard..he..he

    Reply
  588. Siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:25 am

    Btw..last week there are picture of Jtx visiting the hospital..I think he might visit Chelsea ..she has incident ..and Jen might went from the back..and he came from front to distract the paps?..
    I really want to see more pictures of them like when last time they visit NY..

    Reply
  589. Siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:28 am

    I saw from Justin tumblr..that both of them being confirm to attend MTV award..yeah!!!

    Reply
  590. Tetta said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:22 am

    New tweet “OKC all the way !!! ” Must mean Oklahoma City or ? If so we are back in Texas.

    Reply
  591. Tetta said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:33 am

    No we are not in Texas, we are in Oklahoma :lol:

    Reply
  592. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:53 am

    @Tetta:
    I think OKC means the basketball team, Oklahoma City Thunder, who are in play-off games for a championship. However, they are playing a team from San Antonio, TX so there is a connection to Texas :lol: .

    Reply
  593. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:59 am

    @Siska:
    They have been keeping a very low profile so I hope we see them tonight at the MTV awards. Do you get MTV? in Aussie?

    Reply
  594. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:00 am

    @Guest2:
    delete first q-mark.

    Reply
  595. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @Siska:
    You’re right that his behavior has not been ungentlemanly in any way publicly and he comes across as a nice guy in interviews. I really was just commenting on his facial expression which I know doesn’t mean much other than he looked different to me than he does when he’s with jen. As for jen, I don’t know, maybe she was just unhappy about being photographed by the paps but it does go with the territory of being a movie star and I think it would do her image well to smile. I am not bashing jen but when she looks dejected like in the last two sets of pix (my opinion, others have theirs) I think it invites the tabs to make up stories about her life. I understand she is a private person but you do give a bit of that up when you enter the life of celebrity. Then again, I don’t know what the paps were saying to her so maybe that was a problem. Whatever, jmo.

    Reply
  596. Tetta said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:13 am

    @Guest2:

    All arrows are directed against Texas in one way or another and with or without any special reason ! :lol:

    Reply
  597. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:28 am

    @Tetta:
    Let’s not forget that Oklahoma is brad’s birthplace and according to angelina the meaning of her 7th tattoo so maybe there is a clue there after all pointing to both though what it could be I have no idea. :)

    http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/testy-angelina-jolie-finally-explains-7th-coordinates-tattoo-115104571.html

    Reply
  598. Tetta said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:40 am

    Talkingabout basketballplayers, Hassan W. who plays in Sacramento has number 33 in his team. I can´t help thinking of Illuminati since number 3 has some importance for them to. Perhaps you already has mentioned this. I don´t remember the beginning of the comments.

    Reply
  599. Guest said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:47 am

    @Siska:
    Siska Justin wasn’t visiting the hospital he was at a doctor’s office in those pics…the same medical building with various doctors/dentists that Jen and most celebs use in Beverly Hills, and Jen wasn’t with him. Plus, Handler hadn’t even had her surgery until nearly a week later and wasn’t in the hospital until the surgery since she even filmed her show the day before.

    Reply
  600. Tetta said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:50 am

    @Guest2:

    We need a map together with this clue so we could draw lines between the places that are mentioned. It would be a real web :) When you mention Brad is born in Oklahoma of cource I remember that. But most of all Oklahoma reminds me of an old musical or operetta. When I was a kid my grandparents played a record about this place. It was old already by then.

    Reply
  601. Guest said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:54 am

    @Guest2:
    JMO but I don’t know how anyone can decipher Jen’s expression from the set of pics of her and Justin leaving Marix restaurant since you can barely see her face in any of the shots. In fact Justin is visibly smiling in some pics and they have their mouths open so they seem to be talking and maybe joking with one another, so it hardly seemed like either of them were upset. In the pics from her arriving at the gym she just has a neutral expression on her face…not smiling, not frowning, just looking like she was concentrating on getting from the car to the building as quickly as possible.

    You have to remember these photos are taken in about 15 seconds of time. How can you judge anyone’s feelings from that short a time frame? And as you mention, it’s likely the photographers are yelling at her, maybe even rude comments, and her bodyguard is surrounding her…it’s a lot to deal with.

    Reply
  602. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:57 am

    @Siska:
    Lots of rich folks do this so i am just wondering why they they are singeling him out. As for likeing him all I can say is I like his acting and feel badly for him for losing his son.

    Reply
  603. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    @joanne:
    lots of erors. so sorry.

    Reply
  604. rushdog said on June 3rd, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    Not sure what OCK means. I don’t think it’s about the hockey team because they were out on 5/25 and yesterday was June 2nd. OCK is the airport designation in Oklahoma City. It’s also in the urban dictionary (see below). I’d say it definitely refers to BP in some way. ? BP all the way!!! ?

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=OCK

    Reply
  605. Liz E. said on June 3rd, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    @Idgie:

    Thanks, Idgie, for sharing your experiences. How wonderful that must have been for you.

    There has been no evidence at all that Angelina did anything differently. Of course, she didn’t need to fly over with the usual package deal that most adoption agencies arrange for prospective parents to make it more affordable but I have never seen any credible source that said she did anything other than what you did in regards to the adoption process. But I do hope she made some donation to the orphanage ag the appropriate time. I liked the fact that she specified an older child in her application. They so often get overlooked.

    Reply
  606. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    Didn’t Jolie say she was adopting a friend for Maddox? Almost like buying a toy.

    Reply
  607. Up the Coast said on June 3rd, 2012 at 2:30 pm

    @joanne:
    Yes she did. She wanted to buy him a playmate (like a souvenier?) Perfect example of how she looks at children/human life. She put this “family” together in such a short time, because if it felt good to have one….6 will feel even better?

    Reply
  608. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 2:32 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    She was supposed to buy a playmate for Zahara too. Have to have matching pairs ya know. :lol:

    Reply
  609. Dream said on June 3rd, 2012 at 2:36 pm

    @joanne:
    that gossip item is from 2006. sorry i didnt specify, thought i did.
    it sounds very like the allegations now.

    Reply
  610. Up the Coast said on June 3rd, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    @joanne:
    The comments on this article are great :) Shiloh is going to be the star of this family, in spite of her horrific “mother”.

    Reply
  611. Dream said on June 3rd, 2012 at 2:55 pm

    @Siska:
    sexual predators are usually very nice to everyone but those they prey on. i have always loved john travolta gay straight does not matter to me at all. i think hes beautiful.
    but from old rumors till now the same thing seems to be coming out sure seems like hes a predator to me.

    i have never heard one person say an unkind thing about my grand father. he was the best friend anyone could have. he would give u his last cent. people from all over the state knew him and when i run into someone that did, they can talk for hours about all the things he did for them, he was always selfless. there was not enough he could do for anyone in trouble.
    he was also a child rapist.

    Reply
  612. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 3:10 pm

    @Dream:
    :lol: Nothing like not evolving.

    Reply
  613. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 3:12 pm

    @Dream:
    He sounds like Sandusky. His trial is coming up and he will probably walk away.

    Reply
  614. Kate said on June 3rd, 2012 at 3:13 pm

    @rushdog:
    Hi Rush, Ian could be referencing OKC for the purpose of the riddle. Brad Pitt at this point could not get a ticket to to tomorrow nights game. Everyone is very excited about this game. Since he has repeatedly referenced basketball, that is reasonable, although he could just be excited. I don’t know that much about trading players and the drafts and the value of one over the next, but I do understand why this game is such a big deal. lol I am not convinced Ian is using the reference for Hassan Whiteside in anyway other than as an analogy to body type as he did with Carmelo. AC is well know for his very lean hard body, 8 percent and lower , and Whiteside is a “big guy” and that is why he is important really to the Kings and at this point, not for much more that. We could of course analyze their careers, HW turned out to have played his best prior to the Kings, and AC was forced to trade . Since he used HW though with the riddle he said was about Ange and Haven I am inclined to believe he simply means Big Man.

    More Boney could possibly point to Boney James, since he has referenced this point several times. James jumped the shark, gone and never coming back, more Boney (James) , just a thought.

    Who can it be now? I have to question why Ian would use that girl who resembles the one coming out of the water with the girl who was part of the mystery couple, (some guessed Angie some guessed CC) for that comment? He could have used anything, and why the beach? He picks these for a reason. Her back to us, looking out and saying , who can it be now? Are we looking at her and to wonder who is she, or is she looking out and wondering, who can it be now? Who would she be talking about?

    The Branding- the Van Gogh Vodka is a very old family business that was passed down from father to son, each bottle is designed different to tell a story (sort of like she does with her six children) and there are six bottles there, aren’t there? Just a thought. That may be off, but it just sort of jumped out at me the way she has a image for each child.

    IAN, your BIG CLUE on your Brown “eye” girl is not BIG is people can not see the PHOTO , xoxo ! :)

    Reply
  615. Up the Coast said on June 3rd, 2012 at 3:32 pm

    @joanne:
    :shock: I hope not!

    Reply
  616. Up the Coast said on June 3rd, 2012 at 3:33 pm

    @rushdog:
    Could #7 be about Brad? :lol:

    Reply
  617. Dream said on June 3rd, 2012 at 3:57 pm

    @joanne:
    i thin k its pretty common. if ur uber nice how can anyone believe an accuser? look at scott peterson. nicest guy on earth and almost got away with murdering his wife. there are many that think a few older cases could be linked to him as well.

    Reply
  618. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 4:16 pm

    @Dream:
    Peterson gave me the creeps, something in his eyes and smile.

    Reply
  619. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 4:20 pm

    @Dream:
    It is more common than people think but then some people turn a blind eye. I was talking to someone who said Sandusky didn’t do anything wrong since they were college kids and old enough to know better. 8O

    Reply
  620. siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    Yep but if yuou have cable..i dont.? He..he..but thats internet for..i saw the picture of jtx at the party with adam shankman.? His face look very tired.@Guest2:

    Reply
  621. payal said on June 3rd, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    http://redcarpetcloset.blogspot.fr/2012/05/baby-bump-watch-2012-jennifer-aniston.html

    she’s added more updates, i hope jen shows up to the mtv movie awards, im getting desperate to see her lol!

    Reply
  622. siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:04 pm

    I understand…his face look vey tired..not as fresh when he went for dinner with jen..let make wild guess…he..he..he maybe want jen to attend with him,but jen said no thanks..and they a have bit lover fight.@Guest2:….but I dont think thats the fact..they seem very mature in their relation,they seem too relax.,and give each other space to enjoy alone time..

    Reply
  623. siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    @Dream:Yep..public image is not a real image..and I agree with you,they hide their evil crime by positive public image,and the smart they are,the more difficult for gullible public to distrust them,they always good in creating false image to hide the rotten one..and with money and power,its an easy job for them to hide it.

    Reply
  624. siska said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:26 pm

    @joanne: yeah,but not everyone sexually harrasing masseur…even his son passing actually has some kind of scandal surround it..the babysitter was the man which caught kissing with him on the lips on the way to airplane…and something about someone make a blackmail to him regarding the picture surround the death.?
    I felt sorry for him to lost his son..its the most painful thing, a parent should experience, but still not an excuse for his behaviour.

    Reply
  625. iwasanon said on June 3rd, 2012 at 6:50 pm

    @siska:
    “let make wild guess…he..he..he maybe want jen to attend with him,but jen said no thanks..and they a have bit lover fight”

    LOL. Siska, do you write for some of the tabs or gossip sites in Australia? Your wild guesses sometimes sound just like some of the stories they pluck out of thin air.

    Reply
  626. Tetta said on June 3rd, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    @iwasanon:

    Siska, I would also like to know a bit more about who you really are :)

    There are two options. The first is as “Iwasanon” said, you work for some gossip mag and get all quotes from different magazines.

    The other option is a bit darker, at least the way I see it. If you are someone who not is involved in the entertainment buisness you must spend all your free time reading magazines and are watching movies , DVD´s or TV the whole days.

    I don´t want to be mean. Siska, I like you. But I´m curious. I think you have fooled us the whole time since you wrote your first comment. So now is the time for a big release: Who is Siska ? I don´t even think you live in Australia !

    Reply
  627. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    @rushdog:
    I don’t know about but the basketball team, OKC Thunder, is still in the playoffs. This is what I found when I googled okc all the way. I thought Ian was just cheering on the team but it could also be a reference to brad. It would be nice if Ian would drop us a hint.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/OKC-Thunder-All-The-Way/117075451653323

    Reply
  628. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    @Guest2:
    I don’t know about hockey….

    Reply
  629. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 7:36 pm

    @siska:
    He showed up for court anyway. He is an entertainer and thats what I see. He probably is a pervert, 80 percent(probably higher) of Hollyweird is. If its not men its kids. Who’s the bigger pervert? The ones who like them over 18 or younger than 18?

    Reply
  630. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 7:39 pm

    @joanne:
    Well, some of these clues seem to suggest brad took care of that, perhaps not in the way she wanted.

    Reply
  631. joanne said on June 3rd, 2012 at 7:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    I think you are right.

    Reply
  632. Kate said on June 3rd, 2012 at 8:08 pm

    @Tetta:
    Siska does live in Australia. She is just playing around, that is why he adds the hehe, in all the years I have known her , she has never altered her positioned ever. She adoresw Jen, she is fair to Jolie, she recognizes that these people we see are not necessarily what we get, and she is an admitted hopeless romantic, loves to read and update us, as she gets the news there before it breaks here. Going on four years now, same sweet Siska. :)

    Reply
  633. Kate said on June 3rd, 2012 at 8:21 pm

    @Guest2:
    I think your observations are very intuitive. He always appears exactly as she had described him when he is with her, “protective”. When he is alone we see a glimpse of just him. imo

    Reply
  634. Kate said on June 3rd, 2012 at 8:26 pm

    @siska:
    Don’t you wonder if possibly he is pushing the hand that is choking him? Sometimes when a man wants out , and family and partners wil not let go, a little humiliation over and over and over can be the silver bullet.

    Reply
  635. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:20 pm

    Jen just won the dirtbag award at MTV awards. She looks great in a black leather dress. Huvane sat next to her in the audience. I didn’t see justin but not sure if the camera didn’t pan to him or he isn’t there. Interesting.

    Reply
  636. payal said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:38 pm

    cant believe i have no live stream but i believe they will come on UK tv this week. how was her speech? and what was the others reaction to her winning? basically just tell me everything that happened when jen won lol!

    Reply
  637. Guest1 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:52 pm

    Jen was wearing a short black leather dress. Her’s was the first award given. They panned to her at least 4 times in the first 5-6 minutes. She thanked the show Friends and Seth Gordon for allowing her to unleash her inner dirtbag. Mila Kunis and Mark Wahlberg were the speakers who presented her with the award. No mention or sign of JT.

    Reply
  638. payal said on June 3rd, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    thanks! im so glad they kept cutting away to jen but not surprised its jen! how were mila and mark with her? her and mark were in rockstar together

    Reply
  639. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:06 pm

    @payal:
    One of the other nominees jumped up out of his seat when it was announced she won. When she got on stage she told him his track suit was nice. Mila Kunis and Mark Wahlberg presented the award and Mila seemed happy she won. Jen thanked Friends for allowing her to be a sweetheart and then thanked the producer of HB (forgot name) for allowing her inner dirtbag to come out in a movie. That was it, short and sweet. She looked good in a black leather one-shoulder minidress (def not preggers). I’m glad she was first so that I could stop listening to that god-awful show. Russell Brand is gross, vulgar and not funny, my apologies if you’re a fan.

    Reply
  640. payal said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:17 pm

    @Guest2:

    thanks! i saw some pictures and she looks goooooood!, im so happy mila looked happy when jen won. im guessing for the opening of the show jen was the star (she was trending on twitter also), is she still there or has she gone? and not a fan of russell he is embarrassing to watch

    Reply
  641. Guest1 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    I was flipping through the channels and caught MTV when they were presenting Johnny Depp with the Generation Award. They showed what seemed like 2 minutes of clips from all his movies. Well, almost all his movies. One was left out. I bet you can guess which one!

    His speach was short and he didn’t thank his wife and family. They panned to his daughter in the audience but I couldn’t tell who was sitting next to her.

    Reply
  642. lol said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:28 pm

    Yes she is trending on twitter

    everyone said she was drunk or high on something. Why did you all not mention that..

    sad that she has come to this.

    Reply
  643. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:28 pm

    @payal:
    I think she left after picking up the award. We’ll have to look for pics of her at the after party. I suspect JT will be there for that.

    Reply
  644. Guest2 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:43 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes, she called him her protector. Kate, do you think Ian’s tweet about OKC was just cheering on the team or was there a clue there?

    Reply
  645. guest 3 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:53 pm

    JA is trending alright. Everyone’s tweeting that she was either drunk or high as a kite since she was once again slurring her words. Her PR guy had to assist her onstage. JTX wasn’t at the award show.

    Reply
  646. Kate said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:54 pm

    Right now, just cheering them on. :)

    Reply
  647. Kate said on June 3rd, 2012 at 10:58 pm

    @guest 3:
    Well thank you, I guess that ends the womb watch, thank goodness. Hell, if I were Jen I would stagger off the stage just to shut everyone up. Maybe even carry my flask with me and take a sip and offer a bit to a reporter. She looked hot!!@

    Reply
  648. guest 3 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:14 pm

    @kate
    That was funny. I would do the same too if my biggest acting award in the past 10 years was picking up a MTV dirtbag award.

    Reply
  649. Guest19 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:36 pm

    If she was drunk who cares. I would do the same if I had to sit through 5 minutes of Russel Brand and the likes of Charlie Sheen. However as someone who has followed her for a long time award shows don’t seem to be her think. It’s just something she isn’t comfortable with and she has stated that in numerous interviews. She will either slur or rush through the speech. Oh well she did look hot and where was her man?

    Reply
  650. Guest1 said on June 3rd, 2012 at 11:40 pm

    @guest 3:

    2002
    People’s Choice Awards
    Favorite Female Television Performer
    Friends
    Won

    2002
    Hollywood Film Festival
    Actress of the Year
    Won

    2002
    Teen Choice Awards
    Choice TV Actress – Comedy
    Friends
    Won

    2002
    Aftonbladet TV Prize, Sweden
    Best Foreign TV Personality – Female
    Friends
    Won

    2003
    Golden Globe Awards
    Best Performance by an Actress in a Television Series – Musical or Comedy
    Friends
    Won

    2003
    Teen Choice Awards
    Choice Movie Actress – Drama/Action Adventure
    The Good Girl
    Won

    2003
    Teen Choice Awards
    Choice TV Actress – Comedy
    Friends
    Won

    2003
    People’s Choice Awards
    Favorite Female Television Performer
    Friends
    Won

    2003
    Aftonbladet TV Prize, Sweden
    Best Foreign TV Personality – Female
    Friends
    Won

    2003
    Logie Awards
    Most Popular Overseas TV Program
    Friends
    Won

    2004
    Logie Awards
    Most Popular Overseas Star
    Friends
    Won

    2004
    Logie Awards
    Most Popular Overseas TV Program
    Friends
    Won

    2004
    People’s Choice Awards
    Favorite Female Television Performer
    Friends
    Won

    2004
    Teen Choice Awards
    Choice TV Actress – Comedy
    Friends
    Won

    2004
    Aftonbladet TV Prize, Sweden
    Best Foreign TV Personality – Female
    Friends
    Won

    2005
    ShoWest Convention Awards
    Female Star of the Year
    Won

    2006
    Teen Choice Awards
    Choice Movie Chemistry (shared with Vince Vaughn)
    The Break-Up
    Won

    2007
    People’s Choice Awards
    Favorite Female Movie Star
    Won

    2007
    GLAAD Media Awards
    Vanguard Award
    Won[102]

    2007
    CineVegas International Film Festival
    Best Short Film
    Room 10
    Won

    2009
    Women in Film Los Angeles
    Crystal Award for Excellence in Film
    Won
    2011

    Spike Guys’ Choice Awards
    Decade of Hotness
    Won

    2012
    MTV Movie Awards
    Best On-Screen Dirtbag
    Horrible Bosses
    Won

    Reply
  651. Kate said on June 4th, 2012 at 12:02 am

    @guest 3: lol I know yeah? Wow, so much better though than sucking face with her brother, I mean, do you know how embarassed the people were sitting around her when she win her big award? To all see her mackin with James right there in the audience, whispering sweet nothings that they could hear? I bet she never forgets her big award night, it definitely trumpted all!! Past that IS what this thread is about ;)

    Reply
  652. iwasanon said on June 4th, 2012 at 12:36 am

    @Kate:

    She wasn’t drunk or slurring. She dragged the first sentence out for effect saying “Do yooou know howww looooong I have tried to have somebody let me unleash my” and then she snapped out of the slow drawl to finish with a normal “on screen dirtbag”
    Then the rest was fine.
    Very common in NY to do for emphasis.
    Loons are just grasping at straws because Jolie was caught with the Grey Goose bottle under the table at the GG’s a few months back.

    Reply
  653. Kate said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:27 am

    @iwasanon:
    I was joking.

    Reply
  654. guest 3 said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:37 am

    Hello, what awards matters to real Actors? .. Emmy (TV) , Golden Globe (to a certain degree) , Screen Actors Award, NY Film Critics Award, National Film Critics Award, Spirit Award (independent films) and the Almighty Oscar.. People’s Choice, Teen Choice Award (are you kidding me?). Even Brittany Spears won those awards. Like I said , girlfriend has not been nominated or awarded any major acting award in 10 years.

    Reply
  655. guest 3 said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:19 am

    Are you comparing Angie at 23 years old to a drunk 44 year old JA at a kiddie award show? Maybe a slightly better comparision is a 23 years old Drew Barrymore showing her tits to Dave letterman on national TV, in rehab by 13 years old but now a 36 year old recently married for the third time ,pregnant and successful producer.

    Reply
  656. WR said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:25 am

    @Guest1:
    She won an emmy for Outstanding Actress in a Comedy Series.

    Reply
  657. WR said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:40 am

    @WR:
    She won the emmy for Outstanding Actress in a Comedy Series, (”Friends”) in the 2001-2002 season.

    Reply
  658. Guest19 said on June 4th, 2012 at 4:13 am

    Seriously besides an Oscar that was years ago what does Angie have over Jen in the award show department? Let her do TV as well and win an Emmy and then we can talk. Just because she doesn’t have an Oscar or such in her hand doesn’t mean she would never get one, but to loons that must make you sleep at night to think as of one thing that Angie has over her. Get over it she has the guy now let the ex wife be. You guys just sound delusional as her for always picking on the ex even though she has been more than nice (to a fault if you ask me). She could have taken her ass down and Jolie’s career could have been no more.

    I also found it funny that all of Johnny Depp’s movies were showed at the MTV but the tourist.

    Reply
  659. Tetta said on June 4th, 2012 at 4:30 am

    @Kate:

    So Siska is Siska ! :lol:
    The “he he ” is her hallmark and I admire her for her never ending enthusiasm writing comments about the entertainment world.

    @Siska Keep on your mission ! As I said before, I like you and your comments. And if Kate says you are for real then it is so :lol:

    Reply
  660. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 5:51 am

    Thanks everyone,i am so happy jen finally attended public event after so long being absent..love her speech..she always nervous for public speaking..its one of her weakness,,,and its adorable.? Cause its show her vuberable side

    Oh for who is the real siska..im just an avid fans of jen,whos .spend spare time to check jen news and that include the tabloid story..basicly what kate described.? I used to work as journalist..and newpaper writer..the light kind..like horoscope,gossip and romance problem solving….i lived in sydney..with my hubby and my kid…
    My hobby is reading and movie and cooking..and cycling..
    Not very good with computer stuff..
    I am hopeless romantic..he,,he..thats why I am so hooked on jen love lifes.,

    Reply
  661. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:05 am

    @guest 3:Ru drunk?…aj isnt 23..if she is..wow..she ages really badway..why this constant comparison.? If aj win an oscar but never win an emmy and jen win an emmy but never an oscar..its sort of even for me. Aj seem skinny and happy with her family and jen seem healthy and happy with her love ones.

    Reply
  662. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:16 am

    L@Guest19:
    Btw are you jealous as aj fans that she isnt that popular to win the people award like mtv or people choice award.?..remember the popular award also showing that the fans still care and that mean they can still matter..and can get jobs easily than the unpopular ones…so I dont count the popular award out just because you think that isnt matter.even the so called oscar..not always judge by the most best acting..example Gweneth won over cate b..its still almost the same as popularity contest…and the best campaigner,not the best acting..so chill out mate!

    Reply
  663. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:22 am

    @Kate:i think so.,he seem spiral out of control since his son died..i heard the blind that mention how he ready to come out and his wife agaist it,,and used the frozen fertilize egg to get pregnant.
    But I still dont like how he behave toward the masseur staff..really deuchy..

    Reply
  664. Guest1 said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:24 am

    @siska:
    Siska, I think you meant this message for Guest 3.

    Reply
  665. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:26 am

    Yeah they all the same bad when they abuse their power to do whatever they want without thinking about others feeling..i understand that he is actually a nice man,,but his behaviour toward the masseur staff,,which he assuming that he can get it on with all of them,just because of their profession.? Its a bit low end..@joanne:

    Reply
  666. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:28 am

    @Guest1:Oopps..my mistake..,he..he….sorry for it

    Reply
  667. Guest1 said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:28 am

    Funny how Guest 3 shows up after Jen won the award. I guess she was watching the awards hoping Jen didn’t win and when she did she had to find something to bash Jen.

    Reply
  668. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:33 am

    @iwasanon:I am a romance sucker..thats why the tabs storyline m
    ight be so similar with me,,he,,he..and ats wjwhy there are some of us who still buy them..its our junk hobby..we knew that most of it migh be all bullxx..but we still get suck into..we love drama,,he,,he..and love life usually has drama,,we prefer to observe others than our own drama,,

    Reply
  669. Guest19 said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:35 am

    Lol siska I am a Jen fan and wasn’t really trying to throw out popularity awards. I am trying to reason with guest3 but I guess that has become impossible.

    Reply
  670. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:40 am

    @Guest1:They are so readable…always saying that jen is nothing without brad..but when jen make great news by herself, they all come in bash her..he..he..i knew some of jen fans did the same also..but I notice brangie fans seem more spitefull for no reason..if their idol so happy why have to hate jen who already saying that there are no triangle..and she already happy to move on with many other men after bp which already 7 years ago.

    Reply
  671. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:45 am

    @Guest19:
    I am sorry..he..he..i am bit stupid with computer,specially with this tablet form,,still getting used,,and a bit annoying for typing..i think the old laptop much better,,but its dying,,so please accept my apology.?

    Reply
  672. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:51 am

    @Tetta:No worry be happy..he,,he
    I am def real woman from sydney..btw its so cold tod..i am typing this and watching revenge at the same time..i think I have to stop this cant focus..ok bye for now..i am happy with jen new pictures..i am waiting for after party pictures.

    Reply
  673. AmaryEllis said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:22 am

    Jeez Louise – either Jen has a serious medical condition that causes her to slur her speech, or she is a drunk. This isn’t the first time she’s showed up this way at an awards show. I am getting so sick and tired of celebrities who can’t seem to stay straight and sober for a couple of hours at an awards event. It’s not just Jen, so many of these idiots have walked red carpets completed messed up – the Brange does it all the time. I know I know, the life of a celebrity is soooo hard. I am so tired of these rich, pampered narcissists.

    Reply
  674. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:44 am

    @guest 3:
    Hi Sybil, I knew you couldn’t stay away. Let’s not forget the leg bomb which happened in 2012 and for which she is still ridiculed. How about cannes 2011 when she was high as a kite and could barely walk without assistance. I could go on but I know it would be a waste of time.

    Reply
  675. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:50 am

    @AmaryEllis:
    Really? I watched the show and didn’t see any drunkeness at all. I was surprised when the loons started going on about it at ff and cb. They were saying her agent had to help her on stage but it looked to me as if he was just being a gentleman. I think that sometimes actresses and actors may get botox tweaks before these shows and maybe that makes it a bit difficult to move your face. With jen it did look like she may have gotten lip fillers but I don’t think she seemed drunk.

    Reply
  676. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:57 am

    @Kate:
    Thanks, it’s what I thought but one never knows any more.

    Reply
  677. Tetta said on June 4th, 2012 at 10:20 am

    @AmaryEllis:

    You are right about how tiresome drunk / drugged people are, especially on scene. But I don´t think you should state it as a fact that Jennifer was drunk. At interviews she sound like this almost every time and it´s not because she´s drunk. She is nervous. She doesn´t like to be on a stage and talk in front of a lot of people. She is in fact a human being and it´s more common than unusual that people are nervous in this situation. Thats why she stumble on words.
    I´m so tired of these people who always finds something wrong in others.

    Reply
  678. Tetta said on June 4th, 2012 at 10:33 am

    @siska:

    Thanks Siska for being hopeless romantic. We need someone like you as a counterweight to the many negative guests who is here. And I don´t mean “Guest2″ :lol:

    Reply
  679. Guest19 said on June 4th, 2012 at 11:21 am

    @Siska it’s no big deal:-)

    As for Jen. If you are a fan then you would know that is how she talks and there really wasn’t any slurring except for her dragging out the first sentence. Also why act like slurring is a sin…lol. It’s not like she didn’t have control of herself while accepting that award.

    Reply
  680. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 11:30 am

    She didn’t sound drunk to me and looked fantastic as usual. Nervous? yes, the clip I saw she looked nervous, she usually does.

    Reply
  681. Tetta said on June 4th, 2012 at 11:48 am

    @AmaryEllis:

    Now I have heard and seen Jennifer accepting her award. I get even more angry when people says she was drunked after that. She acted as normal as anyone would do. And as Jennifer has been on the stage a couple of years and has done a lot of TV interviews most people ought to be familiar with that´s how she speaks in public.

    Reply
  682. AmaryEllis said on June 4th, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    I understand nerves and all but Pete Almighty – she is an actress! She can hire a coach for that – her persona is her livelihood! And I like the way people here are ready to pick a fight because St Jen appears to have issues – BUT with Ange OH NO it could NEVER be nerves wither HER is HAS to be DRUGS. LIsten – BOTH of these women are known to ‘dabble’ in certain illicit substances. I am not making a judgement about that – but I am saying there is a hell of a lot of hypocrisy on this site. And if you don’t think Jen has benefited from this whole PR concocted triangle than you are mistaken – she has benefited from it and helped perpetuate it.

    To the friendly faithful on this site thank you for your years of companionship, it has been very enjoyable here. It is time for me to move on. I wish you well and I hope that one day Ian has a big reveal – until then keep on sleuthing and crack this case!

    Reply
  683. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    If she is a drunk I would love to know her secrtets for looking so fabulous. As for calling her a saint? She doesn’t pretend she is saving the world or she is holier than thou. She admits she is not perfect. If it weren’t for Aniston there wouldn’t be a triangle. Jolie/Pitt need her or the kids to get hits.

    Reply
  684. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    good luck in your moving on.

    Reply
  685. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:23 pm

    @joanne:
    She doesn’t have 6 kids…so she can do whatever she wants, imo.

    Reply
  686. HisHighness said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:36 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    Please don’t leave…we need you here. Especially, since a new shocking clue is coming soon.

    Reply
  687. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    Who’s picking a fight and who called her st. jen? I was just expressing an opinion based on what I saw. She spoke for about 15 seconds and maybe she had been drinking but it wasn’t apparent to me and based on my experience with my own drinking if I get to the point of slurring my words I wouldn’t be able to walk straight much less go up on a stage to collect an award and make a speech. I don’t think anyone here has ever said she’s a saint and many of us have talked about her doing the PR thing. They all do it to a greater or lesser degree, even those that aren’t connected to the triangle, it goes with the territory of being a celebrity I guess. Of course they all benefit from the triangle, if they didn’t it would have been over a long time ago. . At least jen isn’t acquiring children to pimp out for PR or to deflect from scandal (I like sandra bullock but what convenient timing for adopting a minority child just as her racist husband’s infidelities are about to be splattered all over the tabloids). I’m sorry you are leaving because of a disagreement about jen. I’m also sorry that you think I’m a hypocrite because I’m not. My reasons for disliking angie and brad are many but I won’t go into them again. There is hypocrisy in the media though. Jen is always called out for the smallest thing she does whereas angie was so obviously drugged out at last year’s cannes event with dilated pupils and holding on to brad and no one in the media said a thing about it. Well, the French media did ridicule them but nothing in the U.S.

    Reply
  688. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:41 pm

    @joanne:
    I should have said i tried a few times and couldn’t do it.

    Reply
  689. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    You are right. Single, rich, great job and beautiful. Makes me a little green.

    Reply
  690. WR said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    Buh-bye!

    Reply
  691. WR said on June 4th, 2012 at 1:54 pm

    Last nite at the Miss USA pageant, AJ was mentioned out of the blue. One frontrunner, Miss Maryland, born in South Africa, said she admired AJ for her handling of family matters. (Not her exact words, but the main idea.) It was proof to me, that the average person just accepts whatever the media chooses to print.
    Well, imo, it cost Miss M. the title.

    Reply
  692. WR said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    Regarding the wiping out of records about Brangie that are telling. The cult did that, and continues to do so, for TC.
    Long ago, it seems, he gave out interviews, with pics, to gay mags. After he joined the cult, those mags disappeared from newsstands; however, they are in the hands of some collectors, as he was a rising star.

    Reply
  693. WR said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    @Guest2:
    I cannot remember a single post that called Jen a saint. But, I’ve seen numerous postings that called Angie a saint.
    If one remembers, I posted about “The Hitlerian Lie”. Basically, it’s when a great lie is first uttered, the people are shocked, disgusted, you name it. But, as the perpetrator continues the lies, the public gradually accepts them as the truth.
    To a lesser extent than Hitler’s, that manipulation is often used, today.

    Reply
  694. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Okay…you have our attention!

    Reply
  695. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    @WR:
    I’m afraid that critical thinking is not a qualification for that beauty pageant…especially when Miss Ohio chose the movie: Pretty Women as a good example of a strong woman :shock:

    Reply
  696. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:23 pm

    @WR:
    I switched channels to the pageant shortly before MM made her comment about admiring angelina jolie and thought what an odd and silly thing to say. When she mentioned her name I expected her to say something about her UN work with refugees. Probably best not to make yourself sound like you get your news from the tabloids.

    Reply
  697. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:28 pm

    @WR:
    I don’t recall your post but I agree with you that the manipulation is used today.

    Reply
  698. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:29 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I second that but let’s not forget that Ian’s definition of soon and ours are not the same :)

    Reply
  699. Guest2 said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:35 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Maybe she got her julia roberts movies mixed up and meant to say erin brokovich? Yikes, maybe she is representative of USA young people today :(

    Reply
  700. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    Angelina Jolie and Pretty Woman? I hope the audience laughed at them. They couldn’t think of any real people to look up too? I guess this is why they thing beautiful women are braindead.

    Reply
  701. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 2:38 pm

    @joanne:
    to many oos in my to. I must be one of those beautiful braindead women. :lol:

    Reply
  702. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 3:36 pm

    @Guest2:
    That’s what I was thinking :( (we are screwed) :cry:

    Reply
  703. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 3:36 pm

    @joanne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  704. Tetta said on June 4th, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    @AmaryEllis:

    If you write a comment like this “Jeez Louise – either Jen has a serious medical condition that causes her to slur her speech, or she is a drunk. This isn’t the first time she’s showed up this way at an awards show. I am getting so sick and tired of celebrities who can’t seem to stay straight and sober for a couple of hours at an awards event.” you must be prepared that there will be comments from others that don´t agree with you. And to then say you leave the blog after a long time seems a bit odd. After a long time you ought to now the rules for an open blog. Each person has his /her´s right to an own opinion. Why not stay and continue the discussion ? That is what I expect from a long time blooger.

    Reply
  705. Kate said on June 4th, 2012 at 4:36 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    Amy I agree with the essence of what you are trying to get across. I have seen Jen fans attacked by other Jen fans just for the slight mention that she may be doin g something that in their opinion is not appealing, and there is a double standard. It is not as bad here as it is on FF, but yes Jolie is tarred and feathered simply becaused she is not liked, however, the same thing happens on Pro Jolie boards. It is just human nature for die hard fans to do that. They feel protective. It is not fair, but it is what it is. I try to for the most part stay unbiased when it comes to these stars, and to understand Ians riddles you absolutely have to. He is not indebted to any one of them. He is a journalist, and is reporting things as he believes to be true. It makes no difference if that puts any one of them in a bad light, including Jennifer. He would not be doing his job if he whitewashed it for any of us. He won’t. Trust me, and in the end, no one will line my opinions on this either, because I know he is being honest. Just hang in here. We do not all have to agree, and everyone has a right to their opinion, and this is not Female First.

    Reply
  706. Guest19 said on June 4th, 2012 at 4:59 pm

    People don’t agree with you so you leave the blog? That is childish imo and another person’s opinion shouldn’t affect yours. people will disagree but big deal that is what the world is supposed to be. We would be one messed up society if we all agreed with each other just for the sake of it. I am not one of those fans who will go on harassing others on their opinion, but you can’t just expect to post something ONLINE and on a BLOG without having a challenging opinion. I also as a fan have never termed Jen as a Saint (and I am not going to start now) and I am glad she isn’t perfect which she even herself admits to it. So she always slurs big deal or she might have been drunk also big deal. At least she had control of her butt at the stage if she was in fact drunk.

    Reply
  707. whatever said on June 4th, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    My take on the negative reaction to Jennifer’s acceptance speech is no more or less than this. The last award show attended by Angelina Jolie she made a huge spectacle out of herself. Embarrassed both her and Brad with her antic’s. So of course the loons now have to denigrate Jennifer to make their “idol’s” behavior more acceptable.

    Whatev’s. Jennifer wasn’t drunk or high, nor was she slurring her speech. She arrived w/o walking the red carpet, collected, and gave her speech and left the MTV award show right after she received her award. Went home to her man who was waiting for her, after his long day of interviews for Rock of Ages. They then opened a bottle of champagne and celebrated her win, just the two of them alone..

    BTW, HI to all…..been away for a few days, dealing with family matters……nice to be home again….

    Reply
  708. Tetta said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:12 pm

    @whatever:

    Hi, welcome back !

    Reply
  709. iwasanon said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    I’d agree with you if I thought she had a few but as I stated last night I thought she dragged out the sentence for effect saying “Do yooou know howww looooong I have tried to have somebody let me unleash my”. Pretty common to do for emphasis. (Not sure what it’s called; similar to onomatopoeia)
    (For whatever reason some people don’t seem to pick up on it when she does it or confuse it with a drunken/high slur).
    I don’t think many claim that she’s a saint or doesn’t play the PR game; she plays it like everyone in Hollywood.
    In the past, folks here have disagreed with you and you’ve disagreed with them and you’ve carried on. Perhaps you could take a break and come back to sleuth the next clue.

    Reply
  710. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    @whatever:
    Makes sense. Hope things worked out for you and you family.

    Reply
  711. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 7:40 pm

    @whatever:I. Love. Your scenario.
    Really want to see them togethet again in public,mmm,i think they want us to wait for the rock of ages premiere?

    Reply
  712. guest 3 said on June 4th, 2012 at 7:48 pm

    Angie showing her leg ruined her career? Doesn’t that seem silly; just typing it sounds so ridiculous. But a 44 year old shows up drunk slurring her words at a kiddie award show. Now that’s a career killer. Especially in HW, when you”ll soon have to play the mother of most of actors in the audience.
    Nervous? hasn’t she been an actress for over 25 years doesn’t it come with the territory? I thought she started her career off broadway and wasn’t Friends performed before a live audience.
    My comment about Angie being 23 years was in response to the poster that wanted to bring up her brother AT 23 years old. But I get it, John Mayer said that JA wishes it was still 1998. So of course, her fans wish the same.
    Lastly, I said it was 10 years since JA’s last major award. A thank you to the posters that confirmed it was emmy in 2002. Comparing an Oscar to an Emmy..Every Soap Opera star would like to be on Primetime tv and every Primetime TV star would like to go on to films. That’s the reality.

    Reply
  713. whatever said on June 4th, 2012 at 7:51 pm

    @joanne:

    Thanks Joanne, it was nothing serious…I flew down to North Carolina, for a few days after we got back from the lake house..my daughter is wanting to be married on the beach down there near Wilmington…..so we were scouting out places, and doing the Mom/Bride to Be things. My husband, who is now the FATHER OF THE BRIDE, instead of being FATHER of the GROOMS before, now knows just how much it costs to put a beautiful wedding together for our daughter. It’s funny, I kept calling him Steve Martin…as he kept doing the “neck grab” like Steve did in Father of the Bride….and kept asking..is this REALLY necessary?? How much is this shindig going to end up costing?? I told him..shut up..or I will use his life insurance to pay for it! LOL!!!

    Reply
  714. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:05 pm

    Wow, MTV is a kiddie show now? That’s news to me. I wish that joLIE fans would realize that no matter what they say about Jen….it won’t change how others feel about Jen….and it won’t make joLIE a better person, a better mother, a better actress, a better daughter, a better sister, or less of a home wrecking whore ;)

    Reply
  715. Guest 19 said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:06 pm

    Justin was on Access Hollywood promoting Rock of Ages. The interview was mainly Rock of Ages, but the interviewer asked him what it was like to live a low profile life, but now the spotlight was on him. He joked that he didn’t know what she was talking about, but did say that he doesn’t pay attention to it and only focuses on work. His said that if the media is going to write speculation stories about him every week so be it and said it’s not a hardship and he is getting a great girl out of it.

    Reply
  716. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:07 pm

    @whatever:
    :lol:

    Reply
  717. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:13 pm

    How easy for a diagnosed psychopath to play the role of a diagnosed psychopath in a film. Why that would be Oscar worthy performance, oh wait, it’s not acting, it’s her life. That then explains her lack of a second Oscar award for actually acting in a film. Angelina Jolie is one messed up human being who has developed coping tools. She knows how to pretend “normal”. Where the line is drawn is when she buys children as accessories to create an image, to sell for photo ops for publicity and monitary gain. Each tiny tot was assigned a role to fit into her idea of the perfect family and they must meld into that mold. Nothing humanitarian about that behavior toward little ones. Comparing Angelina Voight with Jennifer Aniston is like comparing cactus with laurel. Angie used to own who she is, and was doing fine, harming relatively no one with her lifestyle choices freely made. I admired her for making the best of what she had in life, but when she began to use negative press against another, and purchase children and change her mind about some mid-adoption, it showed who she is: A humanitarian with a soul.

    As for Jennifer, if you check out many of her acceptance speeches, or hosting of award programs you will recognize ( if you are open minded and not biased) her sense of humor. She is hilarious, and she has many tongue-in-cheek methods of speaking at these showes. No, I can bet there were no Grey Goose Vodka bottles hidden underneath her table while hitting on Tilda Swinton in front of everyone at the Oscars this year. How humilating for her partner/baby daddy, and the general Oscar attendees. BUT ~ it was better than making out with your brother at the Oscars and causeing attendees to gasp, “She’s totally effing her brother!”….much better.

    Reply
  718. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:15 pm

    Correction: “Showed who she is NOT: A humanitarian with a soul”.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  719. whatever said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:33 pm

    The MTV crowd, are the ages between 16 and 25, who are the purchasing power at the box office.

    They aren’t the KIDDIE awards, as such as they are being labeled by the loons (they must of all gathered and got handed their talking points this morning as they met over coffee in the Loonville Sip and Slup cafe)

    Reply
  720. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:39 pm

    @whatever:
    :lol:

    Reply
  721. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:57 pm

    @whatever:
    Love that story..ha..ha

    Reply
  722. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Nicely said :) She has many people around her now (not friends of course, but employees) that she can emulate and pretend to “act” like a normal person, it’s as simple as that.

    Reply
  723. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    I just realized WHY the joLIE fans are in a tizzy….Today is Ange’s birthday and nobody threw her a party :(

    Reply
  724. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:20 pm

    @guest 3:you are contradict yourself..if angie was a very mature decent person and oscar is your standard of acting achievement,by her pose twice with her leg sticking out at the oscar, not like a typical decent mother of 6, who wore close top to toe clothes when she is doing hr so called humanitarian job.And to compare that with your assumption of jen drunk at the Mtv award,which is a fun,award,that will be a career kiil..wow..you really need to use more common sense.
    I agree that angie leg gate will not kill her career,,just embarrassing for her and her family,thats why she did the photoops the day after, but to said that jen slurry speech will kill her career ,its more laughable..
    Oh,btw,most oscar voters also emmy voters.
    Even the most oscar winner like m.streep, happy to work on tv when there is a good story..so please dont be so childlike.
    Anyway..why you bother so much of what jen achievement if you not care about her…let your idol got her mighty oscar,as supported actress..and keep bragging on it,when mstreep,who won best actress more than once,still humble enough to work on tv.

    Reply
  725. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:24 pm

    @Up the Coast:OOh thats why they attack jen,they hate jen to be appear publicly when there are Brangie special day…and how dare jen upstage the saint birthday..he..he

    Reply
  726. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:31 pm

    Out of topic, I saw jen guest appearance on yahoo tube called burning love (link by aniston centre),its a spoof from bachelor show,which show case Ken merino.
    I wonder, my soap opera bone is tingle.? Remember JM recently mention about loving the bachelor and he also once wore the bear suit for his one off tv episode…and jen did this done a bear suit also…mmm..coincidence. or…
    Maybe thats why jtx not accompany jen…oh..i love this my fantasy love triangle between Jm,Jtx and jen,,,(brad who?)
    Please dont rationalise that..its fun romance…

    Reply
  727. siska said on June 4th, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    Well said…kate you must be a very smart woman in the top job position..u always sound so sophisticated.,well put words,very fair,wise and always making sense…

    @Kate:

    Reply
  728. whatever said on June 4th, 2012 at 10:06 pm

    I also agree that Leg-gate won’t do harm to Angelina’s career. Her career died right after The Tourist. Since then she has tried to get more movie roles and couldn’t get attached to anything, well she kept faxing she was in talks to do this role and that role, and then poof nothing came of it.

    So she tried her hand at directing a movie. That flopped. She is now being sued for copy right infringement, and that may have a HUGE impact on why no serious director wants to get involved with her at this time.

    Maleficent was in pre-production for a year. They couldn’t get anyone in Hollywood to sign up with her in this movie. Tim Burton FLED after finding out that Jolie was going to be signed up. David Yates was going to direct it, and FLED, then it was handed over to some no name director that has never directed a feature film before. Not only that, they had to go across the pond to the UK to get actors/actresses over there signed on to do this movie. Because NO one in Hollywood wants to work with her.

    Luc Besson, a director had her audition for a movie. That is off the table for her now…he won’t work with her. She tried pressuring that spanish director on FILM to cast her in one of his movies and he came back with “you’re still a beautiful woman”. That was slap in the face. She tried faxing to the media that she was up for a part in The Counselor, and Ridley Scott burned that down quickly by announcing that Penelope Cruz was up for the role, but it eventually went to Cameron Diaz.

    Jolie signed up and is paying a Talent Agency to find her work in small indie movies….but so far the BEST they could come up with is some two bit fairytale movie role for her. After Maleficent she has NOTHING in store, for yet another role. They have Salt 2 on her i.m.d.b. page, but Phillip Noyce refuses to direct this movie with her in it. They have no set cast, no director assigned because again, NO one wants to work with her in Hollywood.

    Jolie is persona non grata in Hollywood. She burned all her bridges there, by acting like a smug c.u.n.t.

    Reply
  729. Up the Coast said on June 4th, 2012 at 10:12 pm

    @whatever:
    Bravo!!! She doesn’t need anyone else, she’s a one man show ;) She can write it, act it, direct it, etc…..it’s so easy, any idiot can do it, or so she said.

    Reply
  730. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 10:39 pm

    @whatever:
    I wouldn’t want to work with her. She laughed in the faces of directors and writers saying how easy it was to put together her rape/love story flop.

    Reply
  731. joanne said on June 4th, 2012 at 10:40 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    sorry i repeated what you said. You said it better. :)

    Reply
  732. Dream said on June 4th, 2012 at 11:22 pm

    a comic about a loner an angel and a big conspiracy am i the only one watching the ads?

    Reply
  733. WR said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:08 am

    @joanne:
    Yes, writers, directors, and others work their tails off trying to get it right! And even then, they’re not sure, and are apt to revise. Key phrase: “They work their tails off!”
    If I recall, she was trying to cover herself by “complimenting” writers as she presented a screenplay award. My only thought then was whose arm was twisted to give her that opportunity?

    Reply
  734. Siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:59 am

    I am so happy..there are new candid picture of Justine coming out from cm,la..they still look so loved up,.so cute.

    Reply
  735. Siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:59 am

    I am so happy..there are new candid picture of Justjen came out from cm,la..they still look so loved up,.so cute.

    Reply
  736. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 10:05 am

    No new clue :(

    Reply
  737. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 10:56 am

    @Guest2:

    i know, come on Ian! im buzzed about the jubilee today so i need more excitement therefore a new clue discuss. on another note, i really missed Diana these few days.

    Reply
  738. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 11:12 am

    Oy. = Yiddish. An exclamation of dismay, or pain.
    Photo = Man and woman seated across form one another at a table at a club
    + two women; one connecting with each of the first parties.

    menage a quad? Is that a word? Or does this imply that Brad has women coming out of the woodwork?

    Reply
  739. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:11 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I hope this isn’t the shocking new clue. So, is it brad, angie, holly and bodyguard? Or maybe this clue is about jen since Ian made his comment to AE. Jen, chelsea, justin and hotel guy? That would be quite shocking.

    Reply
  740. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:12 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Is anything more than three an orgy :)

    Reply
  741. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:19 pm

    LOL, heck if I know. More than two is a crowd for me. @Guest2:

    Reply
  742. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    I was reading at ff that brad is in budapest for 7 weeks of re-shoots for wwz. I wonder if they’ll ship the guns the right way this time.

    http://dailydead.com/7-weeks-of-reshoots-for-world-war-z/

    Reply
  743. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  744. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    Mmmmmmm, Oy. followed by “An ex is an ex for a reason !!!!” posted for the second time, a repeated clue so it must have great significance.

    Question: Who’s ex and why did they become an ex?
    Brad is Jennifer’s ex
    The reason is cheating on his wife with the Town Pump

    Jennifer is Brad’s ex
    The reason was Brad’s ego and vanity issues

    Angelina is BBT, and JLM’s ex
    The reason is that she is not mentally capable of being in a long term relationship/becomes bored with what is well known.

    Reply
  745. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:24 pm

    Or perhaps Brad needs a new supply to broker? snicker, snicker@Guest2:

    Reply
  746. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    Wild guess: Angie is back to strictly boinking with women. She’s embracing her Lesbianism wholeheartedly. Her attempt to seduce Tilda Swinton while swigging from a bottle of Grey Goose Vodka hidden under her table at the Oscars in front of everyone in HW was a declaration to the world that she is going to be her true self, and an Eff You to Brad. Now that would be a very good reason to be BBT’s and JLM’s AND WBP’s ex wouldn’t you say?

    Reply
  747. Dream said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    ads look even more interesting today. non existent code.

    Reply
  748. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Add to this speculation the lack of photo ops. Shiloh’s 6th birthday came and went without so much as a single pr event. Angie’s birthday the 4th of June came and went with not one photo of a smiling , loving couple celebrating mummy’s birthday. The Queens Diamond Jubilee came to an end without a single photo of Angie waving regally from a boat in the Queen’s floatilla. WHY so many missed PhotoOps? Mmmmmmmm. Very not like Angie the narcissist imo. Why did Brad show up at a bike shop in UK surrounded by “burly bodyguards” ? Is he afraid of Angie? Who rips off the shirt of the Bad Brad ? I think the Brangelina Show has ended it’s run, and they are both exiting it in the best way to save face individually. And they are about to become ex’s … for a reason.

    Reply
  749. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    If Ian could come up with an ad describing a “bum enhancer” so we all could have a bum like the one in the Carmello Anthony clue….well hey! It would be a gold mine Ian…..lol@Dream:

    Reply
  750. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:38 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I’m lost.
    Where do you see a “Man and woman seated across form one another at a table at a club”
    The picture with the “Oy” clue I see has an umbrella with a big light like at a photo shoot. 4 women (2 of them seated) and a guy standing talking to 1 of the women.

    Reply
  751. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:38 pm

    SEAFIGHT Online Game – Cheats, Cracks, Codes, Secrets, Hints, Tips

    ” It is also worth mentioning that codes and cracks are also non existent, therefore do not waste your time searching for them and get playing the game instead.”
    @Dream:

    Reply
  752. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:41 pm

    https://p.twimg.com/AumOINdCMAEzqzI.jpg

    Thanks iwasanon, I don’t get out that often and didnt’ recognize this as a photo shoot. You are right. It is a photo shoot. Three women, one man. @iwasanon:

    Reply
  753. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:42 pm

    @joanne:
    Some things bear repeating ;)

    Reply
  754. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    @Dream:
    I think those ads come up according to keywords that we type into the comment section. I know that when I google stuff, certain ads pop up and then start following me around!!! :shock: I googled some car dealerships recently, and now I can’t shake ‘em.

    Reply
  755. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Poor Ange was outshined on her own durn birthday ;) Her fans are despondent…poor little things.

    Reply
  756. Guest1 said on June 5th, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    Another twitter post – an ex is an ex is for a reason – is about Therrien – not the triangle. Therrien was with the Montreal Canadiens, then went to Pittsburgh, and is now back with the Montreal Canadians. So we can’t assume any ambigous twitter post is about the triangle!

    Reply
  757. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:06 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Did you say bear? I see a bear. :)
    http://screen.yahoo.com/episode-2-29519785.html

    Reply
  758. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    An Ex Is An Ex For A Reason:

    Brad Pitt is Jennifer Aniston’s Ex Because He Cheated On Her With Angie

    The picture with the “Oy.” clue is of a photo shoot ( thanks to pam for clearing this up for me)

    Who is reshooting WWZ now? BRAD

    Who was Brad reported to have been having an affair with while shooting WWZ? Bunny or LM

    Who was speculated to have born his child early in 2012? Bunny or LM

    An Ex Is An Ex For A Reason !!!!

    Reply
  759. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Did you clear your cookies?

    Reply
  760. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Who’s Bunny? Do you mean Bambi?

    Reply
  761. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    I think Ian chose to repeat this clue, ” An Ex Is An Ex For A Reason” with the additional data was not to simply emphasize it’s importance to the story, but to hand the story to us as applied to another celebrity.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  762. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:11 pm

    @iwasanon:
    :lol: That was sooo funny! I love a girl with a great sense of humor…it’s a sign of intelligence ;) As we know, Ange has NO sense of humor…unless she’s giggling about how one of her pets drowned in the shower :shock:

    Reply
  763. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Thanks…that’s a good idea.

    Reply
  764. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    @Guest1:
    Uh-Oh!

    Reply
  765. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    Ange’s birthday came and went….yawn.

    Reply
  766. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:38 pm

    @Guest1:
    Nope, it is a clue. Btw, James is also an ex. ;)

    Reply
  767. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Wasn’t there a bunny in the bambi movie?

    Reply
  768. whatever said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    An ex is an ex for a reason!!! Therrien will have a good first year but will be fired by mid season 2014!!!

    An ex is and ex for a reason. Is Brad STILL trying to get back in Jennifer’s good graces??

    Therrien: Their REIN, (Remember Jolie-Pitt is referred to in the media as Hollywood Royalty) will have a first good year (the engagement) but they will split by middle of 2014. That is when that 5 yr contract expires, they signed back in 2009. Jolie knows it, that is why she upped the anty with the engagement announcement, as she has run out of her little tricks to keep trapping him with.

    Reply
  769. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    @Kate:
    I was wondering if this might be a clue about jen because of Ian’s comment to Amary Ellis to stay after we sort of jumped on her for the jen comments. Do you feel it’s more about james?

    Reply
  770. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 1:59 pm

    A breakup between aj/bp would not be shocking or even all that surprising considering the life span of hw relationships but secrets within the relationship might be. What would be shocking? Angie/james relationship/child, jen gay, jen having brad’s bebe (strongly doubt this but it would be shocking). Which ex is Ian talking about?

    Reply
  771. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    @whatever:
    OK, good thinking on the “Their REIN” but this is the first I’ve heard of a 5 year contract from 2009. (do you mean the lawyer visits at the end of 2009 which then came out in the Jan 2010 NOTW story)

    Also I’m not sure the 2014 should be taken literally. Is he saying a good first season and then fired halfway through the 2nd season. Applying that to what you said above about the Brand would mean Apr 2012 to Apr 2013 (is the first year) and mid way through the second would be Oct 2013.

    Reply
  772. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    oops, yes, change Bunny to Bambi….hard day yesterday and my brain is shutdown today…ack!@iwasanon:

    Reply
  773. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 2:24 pm

    @iwasanon:
    It’s confusing to me because I don’t know enough about hockey to answer what he means by “mid season 2014″.
    But I think this is how the dates are. Hockey seasons run Sep-May so the 2013 season (which will be Therrien’s first) runs from Sep 2012 to May 2013. Then the 2014 season (which would be Therrien’s second) runs from Sep 2013 to May 2014. So mid season 2014 (when he would be fired) would be Jan 2014.
    Did I get that right?
    So back to what “whatever” said. They would split by Jan 2014 which would be 4 years from the Jan 2010 NOTW story (and previous lawyer visit)

    Reply
  774. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 2:40 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes he is and considering what this thread is about I’d say that may be the reference.

    an ex is an ex for a reason = what you don’t want in your future

    I wonder if this means that her roads always lead back to James and this time it’s been a disaster.

    Therrien coached the Canadians from 2000-2003 until he was replaced. Now he’s been rehired. Why bring an ex who wasn’t successful back on to lead the team? Ian’s predicting one good year and then fired mid-season of the next.

    @iwasanon: I was thinking the Therrien mention was also a prediction on the latest agreement to an end which I don’t even want to get into anymore. Sounds like through 2013 another 18 months away. Ridiculous! Yeah right and the messenger will ring out again because she can’t handle the end, there’s drama and the whole thing just keeps rolling along. Doesn’t work Brad haven’t you learned that yet.

    Reply
  775. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 3:13 pm

    @Guest2:
    good point

    Reply
  776. Sparkling Twinkle said on June 5th, 2012 at 3:16 pm

    maybe the “Therrien” is an anagram ? like:

    “hire rent”
    ” re hinter”
    “their ern”

    Sorry dont have much idea here :)

    Reply
  777. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 3:30 pm

    I asked Ian on everyone’s behalf if he would consider telling us if the EX he is referring to is Jennifer or James , ti keep the riddle running progressively and the frustration at bay. He was very kind to oblige. :)

    His answer:

    Jennifer

    So moving forward, I suppose we need to revisit that old clue , and then come back to this last tweet. Or what do you guys think. Exes are exes for a reason? It points all over the place, from not going back, to friendship, to why you split up, etc.

    bbl :)

    Reply
  778. whatever said on June 5th, 2012 at 3:52 pm

    So Jennifer is the ex and the ex for good reason.

    She wanted it that way. She threw his ass out, divorced him.

    Is he in someway trying to worm his way back into Jennifer’s life??

    Reply
  779. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    the exes quote honestly confuses me, i feel im being extra dumb today but i dont get it what is its meaning? and its to do with jen, for the first time i actually thought these couple of clues had nothing to do with her.

    Reply
  780. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    The old clue. If the “ex” is Jennifer the I’d say BP is her ex for a reason and what she doesn’t want in her future. (If my guesses on the last four riddes is close who wouldn’t run like hell from this?) The JA riddle-line at the beginning of 2011 imo read that he wanted her back and dangled the “baby” carrot as enticement. I think it was for him to make a switch in relationships because he needs the pr cover. The 1464 computer “crash” must have been made known to The Brand by at least Jan 2012 (the 3 mos ago reference) which means they went thru awards season and after wondering if the info was going to leak. AJ’s idea, imo, was the engagement photo op which got f/u.

    3/11/12 IUC World Exclusive: Exes Are Exes For A Reason….
    Cheating like Calipari…smelling the barn burn…lying like a sieve…gummy bear alcohol…smoking reefers day and night…floating teeth horse…shit stinks more and more each day…living like the Jones…off the grid…fading light ultraxion…power aura crushed…exes are exes for a reason…getting messed up like a jimi…sending a virus…exes and ohs…the end of phony booths!!!!
    Photo = scrabble “goodbye” Scroll: goodbye tags: (none)

    “exes and ohs” is a Canadian and American tv series which is based on “The Ten Rules: A Lesbian Survival Guide. The lead character’s name is Jennifer.

    “Jen’s call of the dead easter egg” from the Texas 1464 clue – call of the deal easter egg is the 9th is a series of games in the Black Ops Zombie series and the 9th was released in May of 2011. IMO Zombie refers to BP because of WWZ. Black Ops is a secret operation: Secret operation BP from which she was released in May of 2011 (consistent with the riddle clues at that time) when he determined that MB would determine the duratin and end of his relationship (”filibuster whip cloture”). IMO again, the June 2011 “Googling God” riddle brings JTx in as a smoke-screen…for Prissy and Pink at the end of summer. Just my opinion.

    Reply
  781. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:10 pm

    @payal:
    I don’t think these recent clues have to do with her. The most recent tweet “an ex is an ex for a reason” apparently does refer to her. I’d say BP is JA’s ex and will stay that way for a reason.

    Reply
  782. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    The Courteeners – An ex is an ex for a reason

    If I’m talking to you at the back of the club
    Why does he walk past me?
    And why does he rub his shoulder past mine
    Is it to let me know that he’s here
    Whisper in his ear, from me I don’t care

    I can’t believe that that is what he thinks of you
    That I would click my fingers tell you to jump
    And that’s what you do I think he needed to trust you
    A little bit more
    But I will walk over there and make his head sore

    Is he really threatened by the presence of me
    He won’t let you walk or talk
    He won’t let you see what I’ve got in my pocket for you
    And think that you’d love to

    Reply
  783. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:32 pm

    @rushdog:

    Rushdog said:
    The old clue. If the “ex” is Jennifer the I’d say BP is her ex for a reason and what she doesn’t want in her future. (If my guesses on the last four riddes is close who wouldn’t run like hell from this?) The JA riddle-line at the beginning of 2011 imo read that he wanted her back and dangled the “baby” carrot as enticement. I think it was for him to make a switch in relationships because he needs the pr cover.

    me:
    So maybe she considered it and then Justin came along and she decided not to. (I think this was mentioned last year). So Pitt was pissed at her (and Justin) for screwing up his plan.
    That’s why he gave the dig in his interview for which he received backlash (can’t remember if this was before or after the new year)

    Rushdog said:
    The 1464 computer “crash” must have been made known to The Brand by at least Jan 2012 (the 3 mos ago reference) which means they went thru awards season and after wondering if the info was going to leak. AJ’s idea, imo, was the engagement photo op which got f/u.

    me: was the computer crash Haven’s or Pitt’s?

    Reply
  784. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:40 pm

    I don’t understand why Ian would put a clue about jen’s ex being an ex for a reason in the middle of a thread that has been about brangie and/or angie/james especially when it appears jen has moved on. Is he just saying they’ll stay exes? So what, who cares? No one really believes they’ll ever get back together. I’m totally missing something here. Or rushdog is on to something about the lesbian TV show. PA linked to an old video of Ian interviewing a tabloid writer and he asked the question is jen gay and the writer never gave a direct answer. Ian also asked him the same question about another actor (forgot who) and the writer said no. Maybe they’re all gay and just beard for each other. Is that what this is all about? If so, why should I give a sh*t about any of them because they are all liars and hypocrites. They live one way and push another way down our throats with their PR bull.

    Reply
  785. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:47 pm

    @Guest2:
    Maybe Theroux is the one who’ll be fired in 2014. Kate, please let me know if I’m totally off base here.

    Reply
  786. Tetta said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:50 pm

    @Guest2:

    You were faster than me. I was going to ask Rushdog the same questions as you did. I didn´t understand the Jennifer – lesbian connection. Most people in the entertainment business has said Jennifer is straight. Perhaps she+s bi – it seems to be a must in HW.

    Reply
  787. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:53 pm

    @iwasanon:
    I think the computer belonged to JH thus the “James jumps the shark” clue on the Texas 1464 riddle. The info on the computer – JH low point, loss of credibility. See lovetolove thread. JMO

    Reply
  788. whatever said on June 5th, 2012 at 4:54 pm

    Or maybe that is Jolie’s expiration date…is 2014…………

    Pitt will then be FREE. He thinks Jennifer will just walk back into his life.

    It ain’t gonna happen.

    An ex, is an ex for good reason.

    Reply
  789. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:01 pm

    @Tetta:
    I find the “exes and ohs” confusing. It suggests to me that yes she.s a lesbian becauae the chacters name is Jennifer. But i think the character’s description sounds like jolie.

    Reply
  790. Tetta said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:04 pm

    @whatever:

    Perhaps they all have an expiration day in 2014 and we will all get some peace.

    Reply
  791. Tetta said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:15 pm

    @rushdog:

    That means we are still confused :lol: I can see Ian in front of me playing some game on his cellphone. Up pops different words randomly and he puts them together in a way that will make us believe it´s important.

    No no, Ian, I´m only joking. I know you have a more serious meaning with what you say ! It just feels in that way sometimes. First the clue is only about AJ and JH. Suddenly we have Jennifer in the game. I hope she comes here only to say F*ck Off to BP.

    Reply
  792. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:16 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Re jtx: i really think he was brought in as a “smoke screen” in part t help hide any possible evidence of secret operation bp and to redirect attention away from what else was going on in nyc thus the awkward and immediate public appearances. Just my opinion on what i rhink the riddles have been telling us. I realize there are irhers who believe they are the real thing. I just feel differently based.

    Reply
  793. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:17 pm

    @Guest2:

    totally agree, no one wants JB back together or ever think they would anyway after all that has passed between them. so it seems irrelevant for Ian to bring this up. maybe the ex will be justin soon?

    Reply
  794. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:21 pm

    Irhers = others. Oops.

    Reply
  795. janindisguise said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:28 pm

    Since anything’s possible in Hollywood: I HAVE wondered if they are all bearding for one another also.

    And, I really don’t feel as if JTX relationship is for real either.

    Don’t hit me Siska. :-)

    Reply
  796. janindisguise said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:29 pm

    And, I will always want to know who that beautiful “lookalike” girl is.

    Reply
  797. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:35 pm

    Now twice Ian has used the clue, “An Ex Is An Ex For A Reason”…so that is an important clue, but just because Ian is referring to Jennifer as the ex does not necessarily mean that it’s Jennifer’s fault that she became an ex. Actually, Jennifer is the one who filed for the divorce, so the reason she is an ex would be HER reason , and not HIS. So, Jennifer is Brad’s ex because of something BRAD did….we all know that. So I believe Ian is directing us to the reason Jennifer is Brad’s ex: his cheating on Jen with Angie. That is the reason Jennifer is Brad’s ex. I may be wrong , but I don’t think Ian is saying it’s Jennifer’s fault that she is an ex considering the circumstances of their divorce.

    Reply
  798. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:38 pm

    When you break it down it simplifies it’s meaning I believe. An Ex Is An Ex For A Reason. First we ask who is the ex? Ian says it’s Jennifer. Okay, so then why is she an ex? Because she filed for divorce from her husband, Brad Pitt. Then we ask, what was The Reason? Because he cheated on his marriage with the town ho, Angeling Jolie .@payal:

    Reply
  799. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:40 pm

    @payal:
    It could be but he gave an interview recently where they asked him about jen and the tabloid stories and he didn’t say her name directly but he said something to the effect that the tabloid stuff doesn’t bother him and he’s got a great girl in the process. It’s over at ff and I don’t recall who did the interview (Billy Bush from access hollywood maybe?) but they said that he is a super nice guy and that jen got a good one. Maybe what we see is not who he really is. I’m not sure I believe this is a great love affair and I thought kate said a while back that Ian said the relationship is real but nothing really serious (sorry if I misquoted you kate). It seems to me they serve a purpose for each other, he gets a lot of exposure and the benefit of her contacts and she gets a male companion who happens to be smart and talented and gets her away from the bp/aj triangle. It’s really not a bad arrangement for her. He’s definitely better than john mayer and seems to treat her nicely in public. Who really knows though.

    Reply
  800. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:43 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    But we already know that. Is Ian just running out of clues or is there a reason he put this out there now, again? Okay, now I’m going to let this go.

    Reply
  801. Tetta said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:43 pm

    Right now there are to many uncertain parameters in this clue. There are 5 persons involved, BP, AJ, JH, JA and JTx. We don´t know who will be out of the game 2014. We still don´t know if JTx is a smokescreen and has a contract to fulfill. Is Jennifer a lesbian? Does AJ and JH have a sexual relation ? Was it a “leak” from the computer ? If so, what was it about ?

    It felt like we were on our way to something but now we are back on square one.

    PLEASE IAN, give us a clear answer about one of the involved persons that we don´t know already.

    Reply
  802. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:44 pm

    Well, what if Brad’s affair did indeed produce another “love child” ? Remember this past year has been one of constant humiliation for Angie, failure after failure and huge embarrassment at the Oscars in front of the entire HW audience. Her claim to being irresistable is she has bio children by Brad Pitt and stole him from his wife. What if another woman has recently had a child by Brad Pitt wouldn’t that reduce Angie from #1 to just one of two? There are many possibilities in that pairing of what could be the “irrepairable damage” that would set into motion the downhill slide that brought about the ending of Brangelina….@Guest2:

    Reply
  803. WCKitty said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:44 pm

    I’ve just been reading the posts (totally confused – so what’s new) and wanting to know if this is the “shocking clue” Ian referred to or is this just another clue? Shocking usually means something that is dreadful and/or surprising doesn’t it? So they are ex’s for some reason that is shocking? I would not be shocked if they were all beards, so what is on JH computer that has Jen (beyond the already good reasons) wanting Brad to remain an ex?@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  804. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:49 pm

    @rushdog:
    Let me see if I got this straight. You think there was something BP related going on in nyc last fall that JA & JTx were brought in the help deflect from?
    I’m not trying to be flippant with my next questions, I’m just trying to understand to what extent this deflection has an impact on what she does if the nyc walk was part of the deflection.
    Are you saying they were brought together as a couple to help with this deflection or that they were asked to help deflect because JA is someone BP trusts?
    Was it coincidence that JA had her Five premiere in NY or was the premiere moved there to help with deflection? Was her taking part in Ben Stiller’s charity org auction part of the deflection? Did she buy and then sell the condo in NY as part of deflection?

    Reply
  805. Tetta said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:52 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Now I realized there might be another person involved, BP´s eventually baby mama. The clue doesn´t become clearer because of her.

    Reply
  806. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    Sheryl Crow Reveals Brain Tumor Diagnosis

    Sheryl Crow’s strong-enough quotient is being tested once again.
    The Grammy winner and breast-cancer survivor has a common form of brain tumor called a meningioma, Crow’s rep confirmed Tuesday to E! News.

    But, happily, the tumor is benign—and Crow, 50, is the one who broke the news last night to an unsuspecting Las Vegas reporter, practically off the cuff.

    “I worried about my memory so much that I went and got an MRI. And I found out I have a brain tumor,” Crow told Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist Doug Elfman.

    “And I was, like, ‘See? I knew there was something wrong,’” she continued with her usual humor. “I haven’t really talked about it…But it’s benign, so I don’t have to worry about it. But it gives me a fit.”

    So she was being ironic when she flubbed lyrics to “Soak Up the Sun” onstage in February and joked to the Florida audience, “I’m 50, what can I say? My brain’s gone to s–t.”

    Meanwhile, her rep filled us in on the nature of Crow’s illness.
    “Half of us are walking around with [meningioma] but you don’t really know unless you happen to have an MRI,” she said. “[Crow] has no symptoms and everything is fine. It was a random mention during the [Vegas] interview. It was not meant to alarm anyone. She is doing great and is healthy and happy.”
    And that does indeed make us happy, too.
    http://www.eonline.com/news/sheryl_crow_reveals_brain_tumor/321322

    Reply
  807. joanne said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:02 pm

    Was it BP who choked JA for cheating on him? It is Hollyweird and they have different rules than average folk.

    Reply
  808. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Whoa…

    Reply
  809. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    That would be explosive news and many of the clues seem to lead there.

    Reply
  810. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:17 pm

    I don’t get it…and I don’t even care that I don’t get it. Something weird is going on, that’s for sure. Jen and Brad are exes for a reason…..yea, we know, so is Ian saying that there is a reason that we aren’t aware of? Besides the obvious? Like an STD, stalking Jen or Ange hired a hitman, again?

    Reply
  811. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:17 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    I see what you are saying. Jennifer is the ex he’s referring to but what he’s referring to is the reason she’s an ex, which is that Brad cheated.
    So he’s cheated before and now he’s cheated on AJ.

    But how does all that relate to Jan 2014 or 18 months from now?

    Reply
  812. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:19 pm

    Kate would it possible for you to ask Ian about what is the current status on JJ? is she preggers?

    Reply
  813. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I agree with this…and it could have been the last straw for dear old Ange ;) But sometimes I wonder if Brad is really capable of fathering a child :shock: Maybe all 3 of the “bios” are really Ange/James/Mindy Cohen? :lol:

    Reply
  814. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:26 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Maybe the connection is that he will stay another 18 mos with AJ and then he will take up with the new person pretty quickly (like he did with AJ when he left JA) and who happens to be a single mother.
    But that single mother (Bambi?) will really have a 2 yr old by that point who is his bio kid (unbeknownst to the general public).

    Reply
  815. jansa said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:26 pm

    sorry folks but really ian has put up this stories for 7 years and all these great reveals still amount to nothing. if jen is bi so what half the world is bi, and no i cannot ever see a woman put up with a man that has had kids by another woman and after 7 or 8 years want him back. jt looks real to me and i cannot see a man of his caliber want to be a pr stunt for another person no matter what the money or fame is because if it it was ever revealed he would look like a total douche. if ian has a story come out and say it and get it done , but unfortunately i think this thread is really becoming just another riddle that will last for another 10 years . i pop in just to read some of the peoples comments as they seem fun and well written but as for the great stories i am starting to think ian is a great story teller and gives just as good gossip as these rag mags but nothing else. sorry ian but this has been a long soapy with no end almost like the bold and the beautiful and days of there lives. jmo

    Reply
  816. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:28 pm

    @iwasanon:
    And maybe that will be his only bio kid.
    (Oh I see UTC at 6:24 and I just arrived at the same thing)

    Reply
  817. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:34 pm

    @joanne:
    Huh?

    Reply
  818. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:50 pm

    @iwasanon:
    And perhaps the proof that the bios aren’t his is what was on the laptop.
    Now that would be blockbuster.

    Reply
  819. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    And maybe he wanted Jen to fake having a bio child and she wouldn’t but she was willing to adopt, and that’s the reason she’s the ex. She wouldn’t go along with his plan.
    Jolie went along with his plan.

    Reply
  820. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:06 pm

    @payal:
    I’d prefer is she asked how close Patty Anne is on the clue. Is this the right track?

    Reply
  821. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    Could be that Jennifer recognized Brad has no integrity when she divorced him and that he has proven it since by confiding in her about his current situation and what set Angie off in such a big way. If Jen was told he has a second baby momma, I doubt she would even feel pity for Brad at this point, but would confirm to herself that “her ex is an ex for a reason”.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  822. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:20 pm

    @iwasanon:
    (oh good! I’m not the only crazy one) :lol:

    Reply
  823. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:21 pm

    Well, I wondered about that also, mainly because we had the clue leading to DNA discussed as possibly being on JH’s laptop that we speculated went missing. Remember, Angie and James believe that incest is okay between conscenting adults….hmmmmmmmm@iwasanon:

    Reply
  824. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:27 pm

    If anyone has a library nearby they can check out Ian’s book and the chapter called Brotherly Love. It pretty much lays it all out, including comments made by Bryant Gumbel, and his co-host Jane Clayson, both serious news journos who were working together on the CBS Early Show. They were in shock discussing Angie and James at the Oscars. Several photos emerged from before and after the Oscars showing sister and brother with their hands all over each other’s bodies. Very interesting read. In fact, Frank DiGiacomo, of the New York Observer published observations of brother and sister at the Vanity Fair party and said, ” whose cuddling appeared to surpass sibling affection. One partygoer told the Observer that even their father Jon Boight, who was at the party, seemed a little unnerved by their closeness”.

    Reply
  825. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    oops, Voight not Boight…sorry@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  826. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    BTW, Ian, I saw a documentary last night by Nick Bloomfield on Kurt and Courtney. That woman is bonkers! Several persons interviewed stated she has dangerous tendencies and feel she was involved in Kurt’s death in more ways than told. The show was simply titled Kurt and Courtney.

    Reply
  827. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    @Tetta:
    I love your avi, it’s how I feel about these riddles and tweets lately.

    Reply
  828. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    @iwasanon:
    That’s a possibility.
    @Patty Anne:
    This is not only possible, but could explain why Brad/Jen have been surrounded by bodyguards lately.

    Reply
  829. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:31 pm

    @Guest2:
    +1 :lol:

    Reply
  830. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:32 pm

    I wouldn’t put anything past Angie. As her father said about 10 years ago, she needs help.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  831. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol: They do have chubby cheeks…

    Reply
  832. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    I truly hate to appear to be a serial poster, but to add to this comment, I recall Angie telling one and all that she wanted her brother to have a child, a child that she would raise….@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  833. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:35 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Ange loves being the center of attention and making people feel uncomfortable is an additional adrenaline rush for her :evil: sick bitch. Where does that leave James then? Is he a half wit or is he just so needy for attention himself?

    Reply
  834. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:50 pm

    @Guest2:
    Sorry for the delay in answering you. I wanted to clarify something with Ian . I have not made this clear before because I was not sure if he wanted me to, but he had said yes, Go ahead. Jen and Brad have remained friends, although Angelina was not aware of that. Brad has done a pretty good job making everyone think otherwise, hasn’t he? As for this clue, Jen has been a part of this riddle , not just , suddenly, but throughout it. Ian has posted clues that point to Jen. Hope that helps.

    Reply
  835. joanna b said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:52 pm

    Did anyone recall reading that Jen would be with someone for a while to distract what was really going on ????

    Reply
  836. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 7:57 pm

    @Guest2:
    Ian said real as Y2K, later he quoted what a friend of Justine said would happen when Jen got to know the real Justin, that was relaying a story, not his opinion.

    Reply
  837. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:01 pm

    @jansa:
    It is like an ongoing soap opera isn’t it? Maybe that’s why I’m hooked and you can’t beat the company here. Some comments make me laugh out loud and sometimes the clues lead to things that I never would have known and some I wish I never learned. I believe Ian knows things but for reasons only he knows he shares the info in riddles. I think the truth about brangie is probably the worst kept secret in hollywood but maybe some things you just can’t come out and say without getting sued, hence the blind items.

    Reply
  838. liv4 said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:01 pm

    Exes are exes for a reason: I would say that to someone who is thinking of getting back with an old bf/gf. There’s a reason you broke up with them. If you get back together you’ll probably have the same issues.

    And I thought Kate had said that Ian had stated previously that Jen was straight.

    Did Ian not say in his book that Jen suffered miscarriage(s) while married to Brad?

    Just throwing things out.

    Reply
  839. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:12 pm

    @Kate:
    We have said this time and time again, and Ian has never given us a thumbs up…so off we’d go onto other trails. Geez. So is this why Brad and Jen have been seen with bodyguards recently? Because Ange has become aware that Brad and Jen have remained in touch and she’s flipping out?

    Reply
  840. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:18 pm

    @liv4:
    He did say she was straight. Exes are exes for are reason has several themes, that being the most obvious, but many get back together. Not saying that is what he means, but his Twitter indicates someone left, for another home, and then returned. Shrugged, I try to stay out of these for obvious reasons.

    Reply
  841. joanna b said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:19 pm

    Its strange how no photos have been with them in a while ang would make sure off his am i on the wrong track here help us out !

    Reply
  842. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:24 pm

    @joanna b:
    i think it was Sandy

    Reply
  843. joanna b said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:26 pm

    @payal:
    Hi what does that mean sorry bit new here

    Reply
  844. joanne said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I was thinking of the post of the alister admitting to choking someone.

    Reply
  845. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks for taking the time to reply, Kate, I really appreciate it and sorry to be such a pain in the neck. It does surprise me that jen and brad remained friends considering the hatchet job they did on her reputation after the divorce but I guess at some point you have to forgive in order to move on with your life. If angie didn’t know about this I guess she will now but maybe at this point it doesn’t matter any more.

    Reply
  846. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:33 pm

    @Kate:
    I don’t get why all the secrecy of Brad & Jen being friends? Is it because Jolie would flip out, is she that unstable?
    If he’s that afraid of what AJ would do if she found out he and JA were friends then how can he even fathom allowing his kids to be around her? Seriously, this is nuts. Are there always bodyguards around when she is with the kids?

    Plenty of exes remain friends. Why can he be open about being friendly with Paltow and not JA? (I believe it was reported BP & GP were talking at Cannes last year and there may even have been pics)

    Reply
  847. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:36 pm

    @joanna b:
    there was a poster called sandy who i believe sad that and alluded to the fact brad and jen have been seeing each other secretly.

    Reply
  848. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:37 pm

    @iwasanon:

    yes thank you so much Kate!

    Reply
  849. joanna b said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Exactly , how after all these years and by the way ” kids ” she could not have kown !! Just does no make sense

    Reply
  850. joanna b said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:40 pm

    @payal:
    Ah I dont think I read it here was on a different site was a good one but its shut down now xx but thanks for reply , so was just seeing if anyone else may have read what i did at the time silly proberly !

    Reply
  851. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:41 pm

    @Kate:
    Nothing like going in circles! Now I need clarification from you. Jen has been a part of this “riddle” or this “puzzle?” I know she’s been in the puzzle throughout but is Ian via you saying she’s a part of this bro/sis pictured riddle on this thread? Or is she being inserted via twitter? To me it appears to be the latter.

    Because I think “Prissy and Pink” was the end result of the “Mama Aniston…In the Pitts” “JA Frozen Fromage” etc. riddle line – born between 8/23 and 9/15 and that was represented in the tweet w/the baby in the stroller. And that the situation came out of a promise made at the end of the marriage but not possible until his current relationship was over (or at least he thought it was, lol). (It makes perfect sense to me it there were frozen embryos as Ian suggested in the bingo to UTC on 3/22/11.)

    And I believe that at some point AJ found out and was threatening to leak this information – one of the debts she planned to use to secure her ride (12/5/12). And that information about some of this may be on the 1464 laptop (via e-mails??).

    Reply
  852. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:43 pm

    there is new pictures of jen and justin..she seem has a bloated tummy..and being posted come out from medical centre..but I dont think she is pregnant,,
    They still in love..there are pictures of them stare lovingly at each other inside the car..
    and jen seem really close to justin inner circle..she help out Ben and Ken Merino with their yahoo tv…
    I also watch the interview of justin at access hw..and he really great in interview,,really relax and articulate,seem a very smart and decent person..thats why jen love him..I think this relation may last longer than any other jen relationship…
    thats why the clue of Ian ex is ex for a reason..may mean..jen will never back with her ex..either BP or Jm..its proved.,..this is the only men,she adopted a dog and bought a home with..(after BP)..
    I think Brangie has hiding days..cause despite all the stuff..I think they still human who happen to be a parent..so they might spend time with their family..( I hope so)..and they also knew the game.by missing from public,they will create more buzz when they finally come out..which they will save for their other pr job for their new movie/venture…HW is still a business..

    Reply
  853. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:47 pm

    Happy Jubilee for The Queen,,unfortunately, Sydney city last night hit by wild weather..thank God..Im bit far from it.
    oh and another news..jen.CCox and JM ’s mutual friend,SCrow, been diagnosed with brain cancer?…she said its not dangerous.,.Best wish for her!!

    Reply
  854. joanna b said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    @siska:
    Oh seen the pics yes she looks bloated a itin one pic but she was just photoed at mtv awards in a leather dress , I hope they are hapy and in love but have a feeling this is or maybe all a cover up , I know it sounds fair feteched but its all like tht in hollywood !! So wish to belive they are hapy and in love thats what i would want for her

    Reply
  855. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:53 pm

    for SRW,if you ever lurking

    Offspring series3..its so good…there are more drama between Nina and Patrick,..spoiler alert!!
    They broke up and she is so broken heart and got so pissed and woke up with a stranger…I am so hooked..
    This couple always remind me of jen as nina and patrick as Jtx..he..he..

    Reply
  856. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Well, it sure worked out in the media to have it appear a certain way. Made for a lot of tab headlines that could then flip back and forth. I kind of think they were cordial but not in communication much for a couple of years after the divorce. Then they reconnected at come point when he realized his situation. Sadly, IMO, unstable and erratic.

    And I started to respond to your post to me at 5:49pm, was having trouble expressing myself thru my fingers and then this started. Maybe I’ll get to that later. It’s all very confusing – just when I think I’ve got my thoughts in order I have to stop and re-think.

    Reply
  857. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    @rushdog:
    Hmm, and possibly the way she threatened to leak it was by someone leaking the Sue M’s story to WP column MO’D. (because that seemed to come out of left field)

    Reply
  858. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 8:59 pm

    @iwasanon:
    I an sure Ian will reveal why. He keeps hinting, but we will see.

    Reply
  859. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:00 pm

    @siska:
    Siska, I read that it’s a benign tumor, not cancer.

    Reply
  860. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    @joanna b:
    i knew..we never knew what real in HW..like TomKat and JTravolta ..But I am a romantic..so I will choose to believe thats their relation is real..and I been following jen for years..and I think,she isnt like any other who ok to be a beard for someone..,she might help them by going on one or twice dinner with them to help them out.,.but she will never did a full on fake relation.she is a romantic by heart,she isnt as bad as Jlo..because she isnt scare of being alone,
    This is for real ( I believe so,even IUC hinted),she will not taking a risk of her reputation being tarnish because of HB things,if she isnt really in love with JTx..she taking the risk there..
    the only real serious relation jen had after BP only 3: VV, JM and Jtx. the others only rumours or just fun fling…If I have to analize which one of three that she is madly in love will be JM and the one that she actually most comfortable,supportive and best partner is JTX .

    Reply
  861. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:04 pm

    @rushdog:
    This post is about Angie and Haven, Ian made that clear, twice. Jennifer is the ex Ian is referring to per Ian.

    Reply
  862. guest 3 said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:05 pm

    Let me see.. They pimp their kids but you there’s only been three occassions this year that you’ve seen their children. I believe the last photo was almost two months ago. Jen kicked Brad to the curb, but in her Vanity fair article she said she will always love Brad Pitt… so much so that she told the world 4 years later that she keeps his voicemail messages and referred to him as her husband although they had been divorced for 4 years and he had already adopted and fathered six kids.. . But she kick Brad to the curb.. However, Brad on the other hand asked interviewers not to bring up third parties (jen) that’s not related to him or his family..
    That’s right an ex is ex because?

    Reply
  863. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:05 pm

    thank God..I remember last time,there are news in TMZ which she forgot her line when she sang on stage….I think maybe thats the signs?

    Reply
  864. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:06 pm

    @Guest2:
    thanks..hope it can be cure

    Reply
  865. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:07 pm

    @rushdog:
    Now I think I understand your theory about the reason for the ny deflection.

    Reply
  866. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:10 pm

    @siska:
    see post at June 5th, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    Reply
  867. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:10 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Was this the story about the frozen sperm and was it Sue M that recommended that Jen get it? Yes, that’s what I was thinking. That story came out the beginning of January. In the March issue of a magazine (can’t remember which) Jen said “there is no triangle.” Sometimes with these celeb mag stories the general idea is there but the facts are off so people dismiss the whole thing. I think that story was just a little “taste” of the threat. By the way, I think the other debt has to do with securing her ride with the UN.

    Reply
  868. payal said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    @iwasanon:
    i still dont lol

    Reply
  869. joanne said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    http://msncelebrityuk.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/jennifer-aniston-%E2%80%98i-keep-brad%E2%80%99s-voicemails%E2%80%99/
    Looks like she kept all her voice mails.

    Reply
  870. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:21 pm

    @joanne:
    okay ;)

    Reply
  871. Up the Coast said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:23 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Is that why she made a big deal about writing the forward for BBT? Cuz I thought he was dead to her ;)

    Reply
  872. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:26 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Well good because I was having a hard time explaining myself tonight. “Jen’s call of the dead easter egg” she had a May 2011 release from the secret operation pitt because MB would be the determining factor thru awards season. If the the frozen fromage was in process (would have started in December 2010 for a late summer birth) then there’s a need to redirect ALL attention away from that situation. Bring in some arm candy for her, go public very quickly and no one is looking for anything else. She put her Malibu house on the market in the spring and JTx gave her a great reason to be in NYC walking around at the time the surrogate gave birth :) . And then flipped the property back again to LA this spring. I’m not saying the relationship w/JTx is without care because I believe there is care. I just don’t think the picture is what is presented.

    And, if this is true it can’t be kept a secet forever. She must have gotten some great advice from Janet Jackson about how to keep a private life truly private!!!!!

    Reply
  873. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:28 pm

    @siska:
    They said she would be okay, hopefully she will especially for her two young children.

    Reply
  874. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    Because Jennifer Pitt filed for a divorce from her husband ….. that make it clear?@guest 3:

    Reply
  875. iwasanon said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    @rushdog:
    Yes, sorry it was MaureenD not MOD and it was NYTImes, not WashPo. It was Dec 23, 2011
    http://www.gossipcop.com/jennifer-aniston-sperm-brad-pitt-agent-sue-mengers/

    Reply
  876. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:30 pm

    @guest 3:
    sorry.the fact is Brad fallen in love with AJ when he still married (both already sort of admitted this),and jen divorce him(its on the divorce paper) and saying she will always love him because she is a kind person,if she said she hate him,you going to said she is bitter.but she isnt.
    about the voice mail,she also said she kept her boyfriends voice mail also and Bp was her husband..so she is entitle to said that..
    oh btw..Bp also bring jen up on recent Parade interview (which isnt necessary) and when he try to back peddle by saying jen is the most funny and he still remain dear friend to him.
    so please..all of thems still bring this up..but the most obvious and recent one was BP…
    Jen already saying they all move on..and the marriage was so long ago..and she is the one who decide to take the plunge by doing a quick divorce when she realise the marriage cant be save,she didnt make it hard for Brangie to be together..she took the blame as the Brangie parading their instant family on W when the divorce not even final and when they start build their family and most people blame jen inability to provide Bp that as the main cause of he choose AJ…so please use your common sense..this is showing that jen is a strong woman..who didnt need to be back with Bp (a real deuche to me) to be success in her life…thats why an ex is an ex for a reason…she never got the kids just to keep Bp…but AJ change her position twice just to keep BP, ” dont want to have natural kid because of the orphans in the world” and ” dont want to have relation with a married man because of her mum’s experience”..
    so sorry..jen still appear much stronger woman for me…she call the shoot..not like AJ who for me is really embarassing when your partner make statement that he only will married her if everyone else will get married..(come on…you married someone because you love them and want to spend the rest of yourlife together..not some political reason)..now he back pedal and propose,but still not sure when he actually will do it..he..he..I found your defending over your idol making jen as the loser..really pointless..
    just lets them be..if their happy like you imagine,..good for them.

    Reply
  877. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:31 pm

    @Guest2:my pray for her and her family…I hope she got all the support

    Reply
  878. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:31 pm

    Ian made a comment in one of his posts, but I can’t recall the date, time or thread now. He said, “Just because I haven’t told you I’m a mother, doesn’t mean that I’m not”….referring to Jen.@rushdog:

    Reply
  879. WCKitty said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    @guest 3:
    Los Angeles – January 2012 – Maddox and Pax were pictured together with Pax and his gun act
    New Orleans – Early March 2012 – The kids were papped walking their bulldog. Zahara had pictures taken of her with blue braids. There were also other photos.
    Amsterdam – Early April 2012 – Zahara and Shiloh were papped while with Angie on a boat
    Galapagos Islands.Late April 2012 – the family was papped during their vacation
    Windsor, England – Early May 2012 Knox, 3 was pictured with Brad on a trip to LegoLand

    Reply
  880. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    @iwasanon:
    thanks..its so long the post now,sometime I only start from the end..I hope Ian gave us new clue..or post

    Reply
  881. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @iwasanon:
    These are the two posts I’m talking about. The date of delivery would be between 8/16 and I believe 9/15/11 because it falls in between this weird GaGa post and the reference in Prissy and Pink to jennifer sofa bed (his bait and switch in Parade magazine).

    8/16/11 IUC World Exclusive: Jen Aniston Has Gone GAGA…Nude! Jennifer Aniston seems to have a lot of time on her wands these days. According to a close friend of the A-lister, she spends hours a day listening to Lada Gaga tunes on her Ipod while exercising, often in the nude. “She’s obsessed with Gaga,” the friend told IUC. “She says Gaga helps her heal. She thinks Gaga is the greatest thing to happen to the world. She’d marry Gaga if she could.” Photo: JA mimicking phone tags: Jen Aniston, Lady Gaga scroll: Jennude

    GAGA = BORN IN NYC. Hit singles: Poker Face, Love Game, Paparazzi, Telephone, Born this Way, The Edge of Glory. JA anxiously awaiting telephone call about…baby.

    Her pain relief…she was present when a surrogate delivered a baby girl in NYC between 8/16 and 9/15. He was not there because the JP relationship was caught between an autism diagnosis and peer recognition (among other things, lol!!!) when he decided MB would be the whip.

    10/9/11 Baby Girl…Autism Diagnosis and Peer Recognition
    Pain relief delivery…baby girl…ja present [was there] (demisyone = “present” in creole)…surrogate (current fashion “accessory”…in NYC…(before) BP “teachings” on life…bait & switch on Jennifer (Parade article and retraction)..BP decides…near beginning of June…that Moneyball will determine the length and end.
    Tags: Autism Diagnosis, JP, Peer Recognition
    So baby girl born between 8/16 and 9/15/11.

    ________________________Ian’s post:
    10/9/11 Sunday Morning Clue, Prissy and Pink…Plus Two Books That are Must Reads
    Hydrocodone shipped cod…prissy and pink…infatuated with jesifra abitan demisyone…who stole my litas…baked in red hook…singing zoologist…jennifer’s sofa com…always the dumper…strolling with the heifers…filibuster whip cloture!!!
    IUC Book Recommendation: Two Montrealers have penned fascinating reads. Joel Yanofsky’s Bad Animals is a breath taking account of a fathers never ending emotional struggle to enter his son’s… Photo = cartoon man w/pink umbrella scroll: prissyandpink
    Tags: Joel Yanofsky, JP, Suzanne Reisler Litwin

    Reply
  882. siska said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:40 pm

    oh out of subject..I need help,if anyone here had used Teflan actfry or Philips active fry..?..I want to know which one is better or do they all just useless..thats they all the same as Oven?..because I love cooking and fried food is my weakness..so want to use more healthy option for frying stuff than deep fry…
    so if anyone has any experience.please let me know..thanks anyway…

    Reply
  883. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    Let me add with my ‘prissy and pink’ thoughts tonight, I don’t think this necessarily means they’re reuniting. At the beginning of 2011 a number of riddles appeared to indicate that he was trying to encourage JA to return and dangled the baby-carrot as an enticement. I believe the return fell through at that time but, imo, the riddles say that the baby-carrot was a go. My opinion of what the riddles say.

    Now today’s tweet could indicate that there might be a reuniting w/his ex (another secret operation?) but ‘an ex is an ex for a reason’ (it didn’t work once why would it work again) so he thinks it will last for 1.5 years. Like the Therrien situation why bring a coach back again when it didn’t work the first time. Just making a wild guess w/this tweet. Don’t know how this situation could work out when the world believes BP/AJ are engaged.

    Reply
  884. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    @rushdog:
    Wow, the pieces of the puzzle all fit perfectly into your picture. There is also the clue “just because I haven’t told you I have a baby doesn’t mean I don’t”. If this is true it will be the story of the decade when it finally is revealed.

    Reply
  885. Guest2 said on June 5th, 2012 at 10:03 pm

    @siska:
    I haven’t tried them but here are some reviews on one of them. What I do is oven fry, usually chicken or pork chops or even fish. Dredge them in flour, dip in beaten eggs, then bread crumbs (season as you like), put them on a baking sheet coated with oil (I use olive) – not too much oil – and bake them. It’s pretty easy.

    http://www.productreview.com.au/p/tefal-actifry.html

    Reply
  886. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 10:28 pm

    @rushdog:
    I have no idea if this applies but Ian did have the mystery baby mama with a girl, about a year old, blonde hair, could have been the surrogate you are suggesting. The Twitter seems to suggest that he does not feel the ex reuniting , Jen or the Coach is goin g to last more than a couple of years. Could be two seperate points, but they both apply to the Coach. Some have expressed that he does not deserve a second chance, he was fired the first time, although he says he has grown, changed. Etc..

    Reply
  887. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 10:31 pm

    @rushdog:
    Lol Brad made it pretty clear they are not getting married in the next decade, gay marriage in all 50 states, not going to happen..all he has to do as one suggested is look to SC, and well GA. I would bet AL also.

    Reply
  888. Kate said on June 5th, 2012 at 10:35 pm

    @rushdog:
    Brown eye girl. Ian said big clue.

    Reply
  889. rushdog said on June 5th, 2012 at 11:57 pm

    @Kate:
    I don’t know what the heck that tweet meant. I don’t think that tweet clue would tie to Jen. Seems to fall in the “looks like Madre” category to me. I did get a look at the picture somehow the day of the tweet (and I can’t remember how) of the girl sitting at a table, but today I couldn’t get into it through any way I tried. Maybe it was a quick look he pulled right away.

    The tweets get very confusing because clearly only some of them are meant to tie into these riddles. Some appear to be regular tweets to people about sports related stuff. I wonder what those people think of these strange clues. And I find some of the photos hard to see – vendors selling jewelry and food?

    And to add to my confusion tonight my son needed family geneology immigration for when all the family branches came to the U.S. Please!! Luckily we have most of the information but I haven’t looked at it for a while. It can be so confusing to look at initially.

    Reply
  890. rushdog said on June 6th, 2012 at 12:00 am

    @Kate:
    Did you read my posts on the lovetolove thread? I took a shot at guessing the last four riddles. Lol, I think the engagement was supposed to be a photo op to start the headline mill and get that re-direct going. Engagement by f/u! Again, just my opinion on the riddles.

    Reply
  891. Kate said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:00 am

    @rushdog:
    @rushdog:
    Rush, the engagement was one Ian told us was planned by both of them, that is what the riddle was about, lazy swan etc. Late night choking, she did not blindside him, according to Isms source, it was a joint effort to try and raise their starmeters back to where they were, and it did not work. I think by now Brad probably realizes the there will not be any grounds shaking and seas parting if they split. lol.

    Reply
  892. P. Gold said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:19 am

    @siska:

    Good post Siska. I agree with every word in this post.

    Reply
  893. P. Gold said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:28 am

    @siska:

    Again, I agree with you that I dont think Jen is one who will fake a relationship with Justin for anyone’s sake. If she wanted to fake anything, she would have done so with Brad, Mayer, Vince and so forth. She could have continued to fake that everything was alright between her and Brad instead of divorcing him so quickly. She’s been where she is now without Brad, so she didnt have to fake with other less popular guys to gain fame.

    Reply
  894. WR said on June 6th, 2012 at 2:51 am

    @jansa:
    CDAn is tops in fictional blind items. Several yrs. ago, he/she printed a doozy! It was such good fiction that sleuthers were spending inordinate amount of time and energy over it.
    The blind concerned an acting-prize winner from the past. This actress was in truth, a man, it claimed. It was most fascinating, and the ongoing threads got juicier and jucier. CDAN dangled the carrot for quite a while. He/She adjusted the clues to keep abreast of the guesses. Numerous hits resulted.
    The most popular guess was Alice Brady. She won a Best Supporting Actress oscar, for “In Old Chicago”.
    Some of the posters really knew Old Hollywood, and kept CDAN in such a stir, that the blogger started to slip up. Conclusion: The blind was bogus. Well, he/she got it good from irate bloggers. Some said they’d never return to the site after that fiasco.
    It was quite the story!

    Reply
  895. Siska said on June 6th, 2012 at 6:01 am

    Thank you..I think your method much better,than has to buy another tool…I read some of the review.but it’s still confusing for me…@Guest2:

    Reply
  896. Tetta said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:36 am

    @Siska:
    What a relief to think about something else. I bought a Tefal Actfry last year as it sounded much healthier than the usual fryer. The Tefal fryer works perfect. But it doesn´t fit us. We do fresh fries summertimes when we have BBQ´s. Then we are about 10 to 15 persons. The old friyer works fast and is able to do 1 kg ( 2.2 punds ) in 8 minutes. The Teflon Fryer do less than a 1/2 kg( 1.1 punds a time ) and it takes 15 minutes. But for daily use and for 3 – 4 persons I think it will be useful.

    Reply
  897. Tetta said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:45 am

    @Tetta:
    When we fry inside we use the same method as Guest2 with egg, fluor, breadcrums and oil. We often have breaded plaice ( I hope it´s the right kind of fish in english ) and to us it´s a real sunday dinner.

    Reply
  898. sinker said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:49 am

    IAN’s new twitter is a bouquet of yellow roses:

    Yellow roses are in fact, the traditional flower for friendship. Yellow roses are perfect for expressing platonic love, between friends of different genders.

    As a symbol of joy and new beginnings – Yellow roses offer a congratulatory tone to celebrate success, new beginnings as well as joyous occasions.

    Yellow roses within a marriage – Yellow roses given within a marriage signify sweet domesticity and a love that has gotten familiar and comfortable.

    Yellow roses as a symbol of freedom – Yellow roses also symbolize freedom. This symbolism is portrayed clearly in a song in which the yellow rose is immortalized. The song is entitled �The Yellow Rose of Texas�. – In this song, a woman named Emily D. West was captured by the Mexican army during the Texas War of Independence. While being held captive, Emily was said to have wooed the Mexican President, who was also the Commander of the Mexican forces. Her seduction caused the Mexican army to lower their guard and eventually allowed the Texans to claim victory and attain independence as well as freedom.

    Negative implications of yellow roses – Although yellow roses are symbols of po siti ve ideas such as freedom, marital bliss and friendship; they can also have negative connotations.

    During the early Victorian Period, yellow roses were known to mean lukewarm affection and jealousy.

    A yellow rose could signify infidelity within a relationship.

    It symbolizes the waning of passion; a relationship that has been reduced to a bloodless love that lacks passion.

    This analogy could be why yellow roses could also mean farewell/

    Reply
  899. sinker said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:51 am

    being me, i am going to assume this has to do w/ the brand and will therefore go with the negative implications of yellow roses : )

    Reply
  900. Tetta said on June 6th, 2012 at 11:00 am

    @sinker:

    The positive things sounded so nice :) I want to believe it´s something good. Maybe Ja sent yellow roses to AJ at the premier of ITLOBAH.

    Reply
  901. rushdog said on June 6th, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    @Kate:
    When did Ian confirm that was what “lazy swan golf” was about? I must have missed his “bingo/bravo” on that. Because adding another post or riddle doesn’t confirm anything here!!! :) The story just continues along subject to our guesses and…developing….

    And I’m not mad at you or Ian if I sound like I’m voicing my opinion strongly here. I get a lot of things floating around in my head w/these riddles and I recently needed to expunge these out of my head and did so via the guesses on the lovetolove thread. I could be on the nose or completely off base and who the heck knows but Ian.

    No, not that he was blind-sided by it. It’s not what I mean. I believe she threatened to leak information about him so she could secure her ride and keep her own activities secret (this is consistent w/the “‘messenger rang out again,” “dekatrais,” “staying erect,” “exes are exes/goodbye,” and “Texas 1464″ riddles (at least how I solve them, lol). So BP agreed to her plan. Lover Come Back (represented in the photo on “All the Single Ladies”) has Rock Hudson’s character agreeing to Doris’ commercial so she doesn’t “report” him. He provides a fake brand. The “engagement” annoucement in real life began as a photo op at the museum w/the very visibly placed ring. I think that the use of the Lover Come Back photo suggests that he (reluctantly) agreed to her plan to give the appearance (fake brand) that there was an engagement and either she manipulated it with the jeweler or it just got f/u with the media. It was never confirmed on his behalf as engagement…just a “promise for the future.”

    As far as not going “bust” on their careers maybe the reality is not get “busted” or caught w/their shenanigans because things that were supposed to be hidden were starting to leak. Because the secrets will “bust” their careers (or maybe at least hers and cause him some pain [are tarantulas poisonous]). And it seems now that at least part of the leaks may have come from the Texas 1464 “crashed” computer which I believe belonged to JH and the information of which is controlled by the “gangstas” who are the IT people who stole it.

    This is where my thought process has gone on this. I can piece the story (puzzle) together from at least the end of last year with this thought process. I really don’t know where else to go with this.

    Reply
  902. whatever said on June 6th, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    Hmm…Yellow Roses..

    An ex is an ex for good reason.

    Maybe Jennifer did send a bouquet of yellow roses to congratulate Jolie for ITLOBAH. Where Jennifer had good intentions of congratulations, Jolie took an offense to it, and maybe felt “threatened” that Brad’s ONLY wife albeit the ex, was trying to make herself look good with Brad. Thus Jolie had to do something to stab Jennifer once again. Thus the ‘engagement’…..

    It’s been said that Jolie still thinks she is in some kind of competition with Jennifer..even after all these years..

    Reply
  903. whatever said on June 6th, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    BTW Jennifer winning the Dirt-bag award, got MORE media attention than Jolie with her fauxamaritain, gonna save all rape victims of the world, one PR stunt at a time….did.

    Reply
  904. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    @whatever:
    AND…it was on joLIE’s birthday!!! :shock:

    Reply
  905. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    Being a narcissistic psychopath she’s probably banned further birthdays now that she’s “over the hump” and on the downhill run. Can you just see her reaction to becoming 40 in three years?? Yikes~!@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  906. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    Engagement announcement = failed attempt to garner interest of the public

    Baby Number Seven On It’s Way = just another failure to get interest in Brangie back imo.

    OK says they interviewed AJ and BP and they confirmed Angie is three months preggers. Hmmmmm, I wonder who’s if this is true, which most likely it’s not. Desperate times call for desperate measures , right Brangie?

    Reply
  907. Kate said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    Those look like the standard 36 rose wedding bouquet to me, and when I enlarge it so that I can see the stems the flowers become ivory. Isn’t flower La fleur, when you write it as lafluer it changes the meaning.??? or does that not matter in French Canadian, it does in France…Ian is normally very specific with his clues. When he labeled the fish 2 different ways and we thought that might be a mistake, he said no, that was how it was suppose to be. Changing a letter or a word in the riddle can change the meaning. In the past we have seen him take exact phrases from an article, so an a, can not be an, eye , can not be eyes, unless he has gotten lazy. :) . The stems do not have ribbon on them though, so probably not a wedding. He could have chosen any design though for roses, why that one? Maybe impending. Labour ..just throwing it out there, all possibilities.

    Reply
  908. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Do you think she’ll make it to 40? She’ll need to start eating something ;)

    Reply
  909. Kate said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    @rushdog:
    When I asked him if I could post that to everyone.

    Reply
  910. Kate said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    @Kate:
    Sorry meant La fleur to Lafleur.

    Reply
  911. Kate said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    @rushdog:
    maybe when Ian puts up his new clue that will help, things change so fast with these stars I am not sure we can connect all this to a year ago or if he means us to..I know in the past the situation has changed from one week to the next making the puzzle from them irrelevant. That is especially true with someone like Jolie who has tried her best to boonies trap Ian. It could be ongoing of course or some of it, but I think it is always evolving. How many times have been on the verge of splitting, and now trying to keep it together? Brad would be much more successful without her, so it makes no sense , and I believe she would be as well. Imo

    Reply
  912. Tetta said on June 6th, 2012 at 1:46 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    IF there is anyone who is pregnant I still vote for Jennifer. And if so, of cource AJ must be the first to announce a pregnancy whether it´s true or not. She could have some sympathy if she tells us about a dramatic miscarriage.

    Reply
  913. Tetta said on June 6th, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    “La fleur” means “the flower”. “Lafleur” is a name. If Ian mentiones Laflleur I would guess he thinks of the once so famous canadian hockey player Guy Lafleur. Does he has something in common with AJ or JH ?

    Reply
  914. whatever said on June 6th, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate…I’ve always stated that once the “brand” was no longer proving profitable or was going bust, that Brad will high tail it out of there. Their stock is slipping. I am not talking about just at the box office, I am talking about the media and with the public at large. This latest “engagement”, or “promise for the future” was a way for them to get back on top. It failed. That is why Brad pulled back with his statements “actually, truly, really” is NO wedding going to take place, at least in the future. He knows. If he signs and seals his life with her, then he is DONE.

    I don’t see her being successful if Brad dumps her. He holds ALL the real power in Hollywood. She is at the point that Hollywood really has turned their backs on her. The Tourist, was her last chance that she could of proved to Hollywood that she is MORE than a CGI’d, action heroine actress. She failed.

    Reply
  915. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2012 at 2:11 pm

    Yes Tetta, if indeed both Brad and Angie confirmed this supposed #7 pregnancy to the magazine interviewer then I call it another attempt to get the public interested in them as a brand once again. How ridiculous to believe #7 would gain even partially as much interest as #1 did? It’s another failure, and imo it’s their last salvo. After this goes down in flames, it will be walking time for Brad-the-idiot-Pitt.@Tetta:

    Reply
  916. Tetta said on June 6th, 2012 at 2:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    No one will lift an eyebrowe. Does it matter if you have 6 or seven kids ? Any normal human being, except the parents, stop to count after four.

    Reply
  917. whatever said on June 6th, 2012 at 2:45 pm

    Its a MEDIA cycle people……They are breaking up, they are getting married, they are having another baby, or they are adopting. Every 3-4 months a year, it’s like clockwork……

    Since Pitt struck down the “summer wedding” at the Chateau , at Cannes, what other trump card can the media play with them? A pregnancy.

    I highly doubt that the very anorexic Jolie is with child. I will bet even her female reproductive organs aren’t even working properly to have a menstrual cycle.

    If they are trying to use another child to get them back in the news, to exploit this child like they did the others, by “cashing in” on photographs.., the majority of the public will TURN on them. You don’t use a CHILD as a means for a PR tool….and that is exactly what it will be seen for.

    Reply
  918. rushdog said on June 6th, 2012 at 2:47 pm

    @Tetta:
    I’d say maybe BP? See reference below to “le Démon Blond” (even though I don’t think BP’s blond anymore). The description here about Lafleur reads a bit like BP’s career to me.

    From wiki:

    “Montreal Canadiens
    At first, Lafleur struggled to live up to expectations in the league, but by 1974 had developed his trademark smooth skating style and scoring touch. He was a cornerstone of five Stanley Cup championship teams. He was one of the most popular players on a very popular team; fans chanted “Guy, Guy, Guy!” whenever he touched the puck. He became known among English fans as “Flower”, while among French fans he was dubbed “le Démon Blond” (the Blonde Demon)…”

    Reply
  919. whatever said on June 6th, 2012 at 4:44 pm

    Come on Ian, give us that new clue..I’m bored as hell and can’t figure out for the life of me, what you are trying to tell us on this one………..other than ..Jennifer is the “ex” your trying to convey in this message.

    I am in such a BLAH mood today……….

    Reply
  920. Guest3 said on June 6th, 2012 at 4:49 pm

    @wckitty
    Wow that’s pimping your kids (5) occasions in 6 months and the last photo a grainy photo of brad with his
    Son at Legoland over a month ago. Let me see I’ve seen at least 25 photos of Gwen, Katie, Jennifer garner , Jessica alba out with their children . Charlize at least 3 times since she announced her son’s adoption about month ago.
    Brad and JA do not / hasnt spoken for years per her Father who I believe and who also said she wasn’t moving to NYC permanently which turned out to be true.

    Reply
  921. Guest1 said on June 6th, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    @whatever:
    Maybe if we all tell Ian we are leaving the website like AmaryEllis did, we would get the new clue sooner!

    I always liked AmaryEllis past posts. Hopefully she will realize we are not against her and will come back.

    I agree with Kate, that both BP and AJ would benefit from a split. AJ was much more interesting when she was with JLM and BBT than with Brad.

    Reply
  922. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    I agree that Angie was more interesting before Pitt. She was being herself then, and not afraid to do so. But since Pitt she’s tried to change her personality and it doesn’t fit her any more than Pitt’s new personna. They are both trying so hard to be Royalty when they are just plain ole sow’s ears like 99% of the population. It would have done them more good to be less pretentiousl

    I too hope AmaryEllis returns. She’s always had interesting pov and such a lovely poster. It’s easy sometimes to misunderstand one another when you can’t see the person stating their case, or when the inflection of the writen word isn’t as intended if spoken. Usually we can clear up misunderstandings, being such a decent group of respectful posters. Hurry back AmaryEllis!!@Guest1:

    Reply
  923. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2012 at 6:57 pm

    What ever happened to Angie’s “hidden” daughter? The Angie “look-alike”? Has there been more mention of her I wonder?

    Reply
  924. guest 3 said on June 6th, 2012 at 7:18 pm

    @mckitty
    They are pimping their children but you managed to mention 5 occasions in the past 6 months and the last photo was a grainy photo of Brad with his son at legoland a month ago. However, I’ve seen at least 20-25 photos of Gwen, Katie, Jessica Alba, Jennifer Garner in the same time period and at least 3 photos of Charlize Theron newly adopted son in the past three weeks.
    Brad and Jen dont speak and haven’t in many years According to her father who I happen to believe since he also said that she wasn’t moving to NYC permanently which turned out to be true.

    Reply
  925. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    @whatever:
    I do too! Tomorrow will be better :)

    Reply
  926. guest 3 said on June 6th, 2012 at 7:35 pm

    @wckitty
    Gwen, Katie, Jessica, Jennifer Garner with their children.. However, I don’t fault them because I feel if I was a celebrity there would be at least 100 photos of me taking my kids out to the museums, amusement parks, movies, to the park, to school, dance class, grocery shopping, to the beach .. That’s what parents do.
    But again the JP’s are different once their children are born they are expected to stay in their home and never be seen or heard of again. It’s so interesting, that every photo that you listed is a place a child would enjoy being with their parent. Not one was their child / or children posing with their parent at a movie premiere.

    Reply
  927. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2012 at 8:26 pm

    Yep, Angie has said many times that she believes Incest is okay between conscenting adults. Ah, hello James, how’s it hangin?@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  928. Guest1 said on June 6th, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    @guest 3:
    I think the issue most of us have is that they sold the pictures of their children to People’s Magazine. As far as I know, neither Gwen, Katie, Jessica or Jennifer Garner sold pictures of their children to any magazine. Also, I know more about the Jolie-Pitt children than any of the other celebrities children because BP and AJ constanlty talk about them.

    I realize they claim they gave the proceeds from the sale of the pictures to charity, which was donated first to their charitable foundation. They could have avoided subjecting their children to public scrutiny by donating money they made by other means.

    Reply
  929. anon3 said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:10 pm

    @pattyanne
    You really need to stop. You’ve already lost a longtime poster who was just sick of the games. We get it you don’t ike the JP’s.. Specifically Angie, She’s now 37 years old. But you’re saying the same things over and over again.. Incest at 23 years old, drug addict, conspiracy.. Is this going continue when Angie is up in her 40’s and her children will be in their late teens, early 20’s. . I can’t believe that Maddox will be 11 years old in two months. I remember when he was baby and barely 4 years old when Brad and Angie hooked up.. How time flies.

    Reply
  930. Guest2 said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:38 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    I hope she comes back too as I liked reading her posts and I always liked her smiling flower. I feel a bit responsible for her leaving because I didn’t agree with her about ja. Maybe she’ll come back; it seems to be impossible to stay away from here for too long even when you say you’re leaving for good :)

    Reply
  931. joanne said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:42 pm

    @Guest2:
    Nobody disagreed with her either, just said no one called her a saint because no one did. She was probably having a bad day.

    Reply
  932. joanne said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:43 pm

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Angelina-Jolie-Quotes/148213971877672?sk=notes
    I don’t see any changes, crap still spouts from her lips.

    Reply
  933. joanne said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:44 pm

    Its the usual me me me its all about me.

    Reply
  934. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:49 pm

    @joanne:
    I think so too…between the full moon and the transit of venus…it’s been a weird week of crappy emotions.

    Reply
  935. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:52 pm

    @joanne:
    “She (Shiloh) smiles I guess that’s my karma”…..HUH???? What the fuck does that mean??? :shock:

    Reply
  936. WCKitty said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:54 pm

    @joanne:
    I still don’t understand how she can really believe that people are going to buy the story that she stayed in an attic of a house in France because she had the flu. How many of us go up into the attic’s of our homes when we are ill, especially those who live in a mansion, with a staff of workers to take care of their every need?

    Reply
  937. joanne said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I wonder why someone would dedicate a facebook page to her. That is some fanatic.

    Reply
  938. joanne said on June 6th, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I guess her fans buy it. She sure made writing look easy though didn’t it. Anyone can do it, even if your sick. I would be furious if I were a writer.

    Reply
  939. payal said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:04 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    yes what does that mean?!?

    Reply
  940. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:07 pm

    @joanne:
    She says: “I live my life everyday”……wow, that’s deep eh?

    Reply
  941. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    @payal:
    Maybe she doesn’t understand the meaning of karma? When she finds out….boy is she gonna get a shock!

    Reply
  942. WCKitty said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    @joanne:
    Well I guess she is really is just different than the majority of us people. When I have the flu, all I want to do is climb into my bed that is located in my room. Of course when my children were little I was usually on the couch in between taking care of their needs. I didn’t have staff.

    As for writing with the flu, sure. Maybe I am different, but with the flu my head has always ached along with the rest of my body parts. The last thing I would want to do is bend my head down and write. Focusing would be difficult. So yes, writers must be very angry with her since it would take a lot longer for them to write a piece of work such as hers even without the flu.

    Reply
  943. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:11 pm

    @WCKitty:
    You need to hire some staff ;) haha

    Reply
  944. Guest2 said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:12 pm

    @joanne:
    Thanks for the link. My all-time favorite quote:

    ““I had the flu. I had to be quarantined from the children for two days. I was in the attic of a house in France. I was isolated, pacing. I don’t watch TV and I wasn’t reading anything. So I started writing. I went from the beginning to the end. I didn’t know any other way”.

    Reply
  945. Guest2 said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:18 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    We must all be deep :lol:

    Reply
  946. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:22 pm

    @Guest2:
    :lol: She could have a great career as a stand up comic!!!

    Reply
  947. WCKitty said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:25 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I should have, but the kids are now grown so I can just crawl into my bed when I become ill. :lol: The one kid still at home then becomes staff to the dog, cats, and mom. He’s a good son.

    Reply
  948. Guest2 said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:38 pm

    UTC, thanks for the tip on moon/venus. It’s a relief to know there’s a reason for my crankiness. Now I must go to sleep so I can get up tomorrow and live my life. Good night, ladies.

    Reply
  949. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:38 pm

    @WCKitty:
    You’re lucky! (I mean: your hard work paid off) ;)

    Reply
  950. Up the Coast said on June 6th, 2012 at 10:39 pm

    @Guest2:
    Good night..

    Reply
  951. siska said on June 6th, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    Thanks tetta…i will try guest 2 method,and hint to my hubby for the teflon actifry..i still doubt about the quality. I read the review that after 1 year the product burn some of the part.i
    E@Tetta:

    Reply
  952. siska said on June 6th, 2012 at 11:13 pm

    John mayer is piss about the dear john song..he,,he..its not fun when the shoes are the other side..he..he..
    I think he used taylor swift as rebound girl from jen..and she got burn and piss and payback john in her song,its childlike.?…yeah..john did the same..so he should take it like a man…i think he only change for jen,and still not enough for her and she broke his heart and he broke taylor swift heart in the process.??
    I am so proud of jen..she never talk badly about it..she still friend with him..she is very kind..like Ellen said.

    Reply
  953. WCKitty said on June 6th, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I am lucky! :D However, I must mention that my son knows what karma is! :lol:

    Reply
  954. siska said on June 7th, 2012 at 1:37 am

    There is an interesting stuff happen on the vanity fair photoshoot..they put together by brad grey,the paramount boss,which close friend of Bp and Ja.
    Bp was there,but again Aj didnt get invited? Just like the brad grey wedding.a bit strange..because Aj was one of the main player on Paramount movie
    Sherley M was there,she is not a fan of Bp or Aj…
    Oh..and Adam Sandler also there which justjen bff…they all picture far from Bp.i wish we have so spy in there.. gonna be more juicy

    Reply
  955. guest 3 said on June 7th, 2012 at 1:46 am

    @guest 1
    Please tell how much you know about the JP’s chldren? What time they go to bed? What they eat for dinner? What size clothes they wear? Please share. Brad has never said anything about his kids other than how much he loves them and Angie very briefly talked about each personality. What wrong with that? I gather you never read interviews from other celebrities who talk about their children interest and personalities if asked by the interviewer. If they didn’t, its because the interviewer didn’t care to ask or thought the public couldn’t care less. I believe the latter.

    Reply
  956. Guest1 said on June 7th, 2012 at 6:27 am

    @guest 3:
    What about responding to my other comment about selling the pictures of their children?

    Reply
  957. Tetta said on June 7th, 2012 at 7:20 am

    @siska:

    Siska, Guest 2´s method is the best in the long run. As I have our teflon fryer in our summerhouse and the swedish summer is so short I don´t know how durable the teflon is. The only thing I can say is that it worked perfectly the first five times ! Good Luck with whatever method you choose :)

    Reply
  958. jansa said on June 7th, 2012 at 9:19 am

    what is known about these kids is. Shiloh wants to be a boy and mommy is accommodating her wishes as if a 4 yr or a 6 yr old can decide that. a 6 yrs old that walks around with a blankie and sucks it thumb and always looks as if she is miserable is not a happy camper nor a secure kid. pax always looks angry and was pushed in front of the paps before his feet hit american soil no time to adjust but put in the spotlight imm. madax was the one that made her a woman for the umpteenth time like all the other things that made her A WOMAN, like being pregnant and having a married man in her life.
    poor zahara heaven knows what she is because she must take over the operation in an African country whether she can or wants to. and the pictures of her that should have be private and in a family album was plastered all over the mags, as for the twins funny enough they have been more protected than the rest ?
    but the boy was born to be a actor or a musician and the girl is the one that will be the female diva . they have peed and sh=== and thrown up on their parents and are dragged from pillar to post and fed coke to wake them up for the unnecessary trips all over the world.
    they do not have a permanent home and do not attend a school like normal kids as they are so above the average kids that mommy , daddy and tutors are teaching them ( HEAVEN HELP THEM AS BOTH PARENTS ARE AS THICK AS A BRICK AND NEVER FINISHED ANYTHING IN THEIR LIVES) well that is just a few things and it is more than my kids grandparents of uncles and aunts know about my kids. jmo

    Reply
  959. Up the Coast said on June 7th, 2012 at 11:12 am

    @Guest1:
    Be careful…remember that you are conversing with someone who truly believes crazy comments like this: “I had the flu. I had to be quarantined from the children for two days. I was in the attic of a house in France. I was isolated, pacing. I don’t watch TV and I wasn’t reading anything. So I started writing. I went from the beginning to the end. I didn’t know any other way”. :shock: You can go crazy trying to talk sense to someone like this.

    Reply
  960. Up the Coast said on June 7th, 2012 at 11:16 am

    @jansa:
    And that’s IT in a nutshell ;)

    Reply
  961. Sparkling Twinkle said on June 7th, 2012 at 11:36 am

    I confess to never have solved any of the riddles, but I try all the same.

    hayneedle sandbox – a contained child, the child is safe and happy? ( a surrogate child hidden) a contained mess, prevent spillage?
    flying to the moon hacked -the relationship was always about money and to gain power along the way!
    boobie trap game – taking things apart carefully, good descisions required. – The relationship needs to come apart slowly for the main goal.
    french mistress paintbox – more space, contains more than it appears to. (what is being hidden)
    stolen valor act – to lie about credentials, A fake reputation? to pretend to be something you are not.
    gone and never coming back – a pain still exists for a love lost.
    uncle kracker smile – life is better because of this person, even though they may not still be with you.
    donning and doffing – putting on and taking it off – the essential “uniform” they have to wear to face the public for the job they must do.
    jango fett – the legacy will live on (i’d honestly love this to be bounty hunter gerard butler ;) ) but its likely to be that a triangle will forever continue, and the kids will ensure their public interest remains regardless of being a couple or not.
    brotherly love – james haven
    sealing the abyss gate- the last quest of the campaign, is this their final act?
    Hassan whiteside – climbed the ladder fast, gained attention quickly, a fake career? fake relationship? came out of nowhere basically and hit the top instantly.
    child welfare league of america!!!!! – 5 children? 5 eggs? .. HRH IAN, is the 5 exclamations relevent?

    now the exes are exes comment – Would this be either – JOHN MAYER? GER BUTLER

    I guess its probably brad being that – now that he has been with Angelina for so long that jen couldnt ever go there again, but … she and he may still both want to???

    Reply
  962. Sparkling Twinkle said on June 7th, 2012 at 11:37 am

    @Up the Coast:
    hey my lovely one x x x x

    Reply
  963. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2012 at 11:40 am

    I think so too. There is a reason so many of us have remained here on IUC for over four years, and I think it’s the sort of dialog we share so candidly and freely. I’m not much into posting on several blogs, just two , but I do read on some and see the constant arrogance of those who admonish others for not posting what they wish to read about their idols. If something said here doesn’t suit them, they should use their right to leave here, and post elsewhere where the majority of the posts are in favor of their idols. @Guest2:

    Reply
  964. Up the Coast said on June 7th, 2012 at 11:58 am

    @Sparkling Twinkle:
    I like your perspective on these clues…I hadn’t thought about the boobie trap game, in that way, but it fits nicely, imo. Nice to see YOU!

    Reply
  965. Guest1 said on June 7th, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Thanks for the reminder!

    Reply
  966. whatever said on June 7th, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    I just watched the movie Drive on Netflix…..OMG, if you haven’t seen it, SEE it.
    It is truly a shame that he didn’t get a nomination for an Oscar, for this portrayal..yet someone like PITT keeps getting nominations after nominations, and he doesn’t have one tenth the talent that Ryan has.

    Reply
  967. WR said on June 7th, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    @whatever:
    Yes! One whose opinion I respect mentioned that he, the critic for one, was uncomfortable watching Pitt trying so hard, to act. At least one other actor, Michael Fassbender, is said to have been robbed, (for “Shame”) because of BP.
    When one looks at a list of great actors who didn’t receive a single nomination, or just one, it just points out what great talents like George C. Scott, Marlon Brando and Woody Allen have said; that the oscars are a popularity contest; a beauty contest!

    Reply
  968. Up the Coast said on June 7th, 2012 at 1:25 pm

    @whatever:
    Thanks for the recommendation…George Clooney thinks Ryan is a great actor too! We have to remember that these people (their publicists/producers/studios) are the ones who put them and their movies up for the nominations, and that’s why people like Brad get nomination after nomination. Not necessarily because he is a good actor (cuz he’s not).

    Reply
  969. Sparkling Twinkle said on June 7th, 2012 at 2:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    @Up the Coast:

    Nice to see you too my lovely!

    what amazes me is the info that will always be readily available on and off the internet about them.

    Stories dont die, the gather legs and walk…

    and where there is smoke…….

    my point is – no matter what, the stories of their past and present (maybe future) will forever be the present for their children, no matter what!
    people cast up tales.
    people tell lies
    people tell the truth
    people remind others

    AKA – PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER AND TALK!
    nothing remains hidden forever!

    *does a little bow and waves to friends*

    Reply
  970. Sparkling Twinkle said on June 7th, 2012 at 2:10 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Did you celebrate the jubilee? hopefully not showing your crown jewels :lol:

    Reply
  971. Guest2 said on June 7th, 2012 at 3:23 pm

    Hi Guys, just taking a quick break to see what’s going on. It looks like the black tent and hat are back but no pink parasol. This woman must get off on sweating.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=315353

    Reply
  972. whatever said on June 7th, 2012 at 3:33 pm

    I keep checking back in to see if Ian has graced us with a new clue……. in between cleaning and getting packing done and going up to the lake again this weekend….

    Reply
  973. WCKitty said on June 7th, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    @Guest2:
    Notice that there are two versions of what she did for her birthday. Some posters are saying that Brad’s picture is photo-shopped into the picture. Whether-or-not this is true, they sure aren’t standing next to each other. Did you see the new Jolie fax about the Pax and Maddox’s secret language, IOW more personal information about their children’s private lives. I agree with the poster who stated that neither boy probably actually knows their native language.

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=315362

    Reply
  974. Guest2 said on June 7th, 2012 at 4:10 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I did read about the secret language and what was really funny is they said angie has it sort of figured out but brad doesn’t have a clue. Poor, poor brad, dumb as a doorknob. Her “fax” is working overtime. I thought there was somthing odd about the picture because brad looked so much taller than everyone else. I’ll have to check it out when I get home tonight. Maybe she was photoshopped into the picture too!

    Reply
  975. WCKitty said on June 7th, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    @Guest2:
    She could have been because it was also reported that they were both there (secretly) and not one photo was taken. You probably also read this link:

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=315358

    Reply
  976. liv4 said on June 7th, 2012 at 5:40 pm

    @Sparkling Twinkle:
    Your guesses are quite good. You should play more often when life doesn’t get in the way. I agree with UTC and boobie trap.

    Reply
  977. joanne said on June 7th, 2012 at 6:02 pm

    @Guest2:
    I guess they are trying to make us believe Maddox and his toy Pax get along. I hope they do now that they are older.

    Reply
  978. joanne said on June 7th, 2012 at 6:04 pm

    @Sparkling Twinkle:
    The stolen valor act makes sense along with most of what you said. They are the fakest of fakers.

    Reply
  979. joanne said on June 7th, 2012 at 6:05 pm

    @WCKitty:
    It was so secret someone blogged about it. :lol:

    Reply
  980. Guest2 said on June 7th, 2012 at 6:32 pm

    @siska:
    Siska, where did you get the info about the vanity fair shoot?

    Reply
  981. janindisguise said on June 7th, 2012 at 6:38 pm

    Hello all. I haven’t really been here to read everything written. Is AJ getting a boobie job? Heh.

    When will we have the info on who Ian’s friend is? You know, the beautiful young AJ looker? I must know. I must!

    Hope everyone has a wonderful evening. Gotta go get my cut and color. After all, I am a star! :-)

    Reply
  982. Up the Coast said on June 7th, 2012 at 6:58 pm

    @WCKitty:
    That’s hilarious!

    Reply
  983. Guest2 said on June 7th, 2012 at 7:20 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I’ve looked at the photo again and I think someone at ff photoshopped it as a joke. I know she’s nuttier than peanut brittle but I don’t think she’d be caught wearing the same outfit twice.

    Reply
  984. WCKitty said on June 7th, 2012 at 8:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    True, but how many times has she worn those ugly tan shoes? So, was Brad actually there to help celebrate her birthday or was she alone at home crying in the shower. Or did she actually go to Egypt with or without Brad? Her faxes don’t jive! :lol:

    Reply
  985. guest 3 said on June 7th, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    @guest 2
    Guess What? she wears the same dresses, shoes, t-shirts, pants, blazers, skirts , sweaters over and over again. Haven’t you noticed? That’s nutty.. but I believe most normal/average people wear the same thing more than once. Oh I forgot, Angie’s superficicial so she shouldn’t wear the same outfit more than once.

    Reply
  986. Guest2 said on June 7th, 2012 at 9:04 pm

    @WCKitty:
    I don’t think either of them went to Egypt. They’re just messing with us. They probably stayed home and drank all day because I doubt she ate cake :lol:

    Reply
  987. Guest2 said on June 7th, 2012 at 9:05 pm

    @guest 3:
    yawn.

    Reply
  988. WCKitty said on June 7th, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    @Guest2:
    +1 :D

    Reply
  989. Siska said on June 8th, 2012 at 1:40 am

    @Tetta:
    Thank you..I think I will stick with oven method until maybe someone (wink to my hubby) give me as my “good wife” gift..he,he
    Fried stuff is my weakness..specially friend fish..and they are quite messy and smelly to deep fried..so I only resort on doing it outdoor or wait till I’m going back to my mum home..he..he

    Reply