IUC Breaking Story: Famous Hollywood Couple Ordered to Watch NBA Basketball In The Raw

Posted on April 13th, 2012 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

An A-list Hollywood couple recently went through relationship counseling. Part of their treatment therapy involves watching one NBA game a week in the their birthday suits. Both were advised to cease smoking and were given the patch to help kick their nic rawhoopsfits. Developing…

*****Breaking Update on “engagement” coming soon*****

  • 348 Comments
  • Tags:
  1. payal said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:26 am

    what?!?! this is the breaking story, im disappointed.

    Reply
  2. joanne said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:32 am

    The Smiths? Its kind of stupid though. The powers that be must be getting senile.

    Reply
  3. Jaded said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:57 am

    Doesn’t sound like much of a relationship counsellor. I find this hard to believe.

    Reply
  4. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:10 am

    Which couple are fans of basketball? I wonder who did the relationship counselling. You have to admit that’s a nice derriere.

    Reply
  5. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 11:18 am

    Heaving a heavy sigh, ugh. Ian, I’ve been supportive of this puzzle/riddle, whatever we should call it for a long time and I appreciate all your efforts, but….heavy sigh again. So, o.k., I’ll play. I would appreciate a little “hint” on my direction of thought :) . Largely figurative.

    My guess: they’ve been given a specific about of time to work it out with weekly open conversations or meetings with full disclosure for the next two months. The “smoking” reference may be literal but I think would include ‘quit trying to damage.’

    No tag ties into the Brand and probably someone else, that’s my opinion on these type of things. This is not what it appears so we have to figure out the “breaking story.” Again, jmo. But if this is about the Brand then a “breaking story” imo is not about them being happy or staying together (because that’s what many think is going on) but finally ending it all. Relationship counseling and couples therapy are different (see below) so Ian’s selection of “relationship counseling” is relevant to what this really means.

    My guess to begin with is that “have been ordered” sounds like sides have been told to work “it” out, again, not to stay together, but to come to a final agreement. NBA playoffs run through mid-June. Birthday suit/nude is without clothes, so maybe fully disclosed? Her birthday is the beginning of June (as is Heidi Klum and Seal has been photographed at Lakers games so would suggest them as a possible other couple if there is one).

    If you search “in the raw” two things that come to the top of the list:
    In The Raw sushi – a chain in Oklahoma; and,
    a website about “earthmother” (which she is not by the way, nor is that what her butt looks like, no way)

    Also “raw” – means not cooked, natural, inexperienced, uncomfortably cold and damp, brutal and coarse
    Smoking – (smoke -the vaporous matter arising from something burning [burn - to destroy by fire, to injure or damage])
    From Wiki:
    Relationship counseling is the process of counseling the parties of a relationship in an effort to recognize and to better manage or reconcile troublesome differences and repeating patterns of distress. The relationship involved may be between members of a family or a couple (see also family therapy), employees or employers in a workplace, or between a professional and a client. Couple therapy (or relationship therapy) is a related and different process
    Therapy (in Greek: θεραπεία), or treatment, is the attempted remediation of a health problem, usually following a diagnosis. In the medical field, it is synonymous with the word “treatment”. Among psychologists, the term may refer specifically to psychotherapy or “talk therapy.

    Reply
  6. Alissa said on April 13th, 2012 at 11:25 am

    One thing for sure: That’s not Angie’s flat ass.

    Reply
  7. Violet said on April 13th, 2012 at 11:29 am

    Sorry, Ian, but this clue is just plain ass-inine.

    Reply
  8. liv4 said on April 13th, 2012 at 11:57 am

    Is this even about them?

    The only things that come to mind is addiction therapy; meeting one time per week to work something out; stripped down to nothing. vulnerable, find a way to work it out.

    Reply
  9. liv4 said on April 13th, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    Ya know at this point in their lives I don’t think seeing each other nekkid is going to do anything but repulse each other. I imagine he looks better in his onsie than nekkid. And she could hurt someone with those sharp objects that are her limbs.

    So a game plan is being worked on and they are ordered to show up without all their baggage?

    Ian, I don’t think we are as clever as you evidently think we are.

    Reply
  10. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 12:15 pm

    “Both were advised to cease smoking and were given the patch to help kick their nic fits”

    This could be literal w/a “patch” to help w/nicotine or other drugs. I think it is probably also figurative and has to do with anger, inflicing damage (as in the tabs – see recent Angie confesses relationship w/former boyfriend – this stuff is planted in the tabs by interested parties as much as the tab publishers pull it out of their ass). In this case the “patch” is probably a gag order.

    Urban dictionary
    nic fit
    a contraction of two words; nic – short form for nicotine fit – to freak out when a person is jonesing for a cigarette
    jonesing
    to have a strong need, desire, or craving for something, usually related to chemical dependency

    Reply
  11. Debbi said on April 13th, 2012 at 12:24 pm

    THIS was the breaking story. Come on Ian! This is getting tedious, and rushdog, although I appreciate all the work you do in these riddles, I think it’s a stretch to get what you got out of this clue.

    Reply
  12. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 12:31 pm

    @liv4:
    Yes this is about them, absolutely, imo. The “no tags” run continuously thoughout the puzzle and I don’t think Ian would use a “no tag” suddenly and only in reference to another party.

    What medical professional of any kind would suggest watching one basketball game per week in the nude as a way of healing anything? Nope, not happening.

    “Couple ordered…” “Both were advised…” This is the courts or an arbitrator.

    I would expect the “relationship counseling” is about the division of assets, the children and the functioning of their homes, staff, etc. and how they will step away publicly. I believe the agreement back with the NOTW leak was about how they were going to live at that time and until one of them met someone else. Think that was his plan to gradually step away. If there was an agreement as to the children and assets back then I would think an updated version would be needed to reflect the current situation. Easter Bunny vs. Genghis Kahn.

    That’s what I’m going with on this post. It makes sense to me although I wish is was straightforward!!!

    Reply
  13. Tetta said on April 13th, 2012 at 12:32 pm

    When I put the cursor on the picture i get the tag “raw hoop”. I don´t know if it´s the photographers or Ians tag.

    Reply
  14. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    From the photo:
    frontarmy.com – Sexy girl galleries and videos featuring FRONT magazine cover girls and Alt Girls. FRONT Army, the funniest, sexiest website on the planet.

    Reply
  15. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 12:58 pm

    It’s hard to view this clue from work because of that photo (really, Ian, some of us do work, you know!). I think rush is right that this is about the brand and the counseling may relate to what she says above and ties in to all the other clues. There have been tabloid stories lately about pax and his birth mother wanting him back. Now there are photos of brangie with pax taken at a museum in LA that has a Chinese exhibit. I wonder what that’s about and if it ties to any of this. This clue is so out there I feel almost silly even commenting on it. Come on, Ian, what’s the deal here?

    Kate??

    Reply
  16. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    @joanne:
    I was thinking Khloe and Lamar, cuz of the basketball, and he’s lost his mojo.
    @rushdog:
    I always enjoy the way your mind works ;) I prefer when Ian uses a “tag”, and I agree that we deserve more feedback from him. (come on Ian).
    @liv4:
    I also think those days are over…neither one of them are looking very good.

    Reply
  17. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    @Alissa:
    @Violet:
    :lol: It must be an ass model.

    Reply
  18. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    Arbitration – isn’t that what BP/JA used when they divorced? I seem to recall this though I wasn’t following it at them time. There are pros and cons to the process with one pro being that it’s private and confidential. I think Ian is saying that someone in authority (and it wouldn’t be a handler or a studio) “ordered…and advised” the HW couple. And I happen to think it’s the Brand because that’s what he’s been posting about…at least we seem to think it is :) !!

    What is the NBA doing as part of this post? Watching the NBA games from now until mid-June are the playoffs, team vs team, until there is one final champion.

    “Famous Hollywood Couple Ordered to Watch NBA Basketball In The Raw”
    The Brand arbitration team vs team playoffs full disclosure/no clothes

    I really don’t think it’s a stretch to guess this is what Ian means with this post. It could also refer to HK/S because if there’s a divorce they’re probably going through the same thing. Same with the Smiths although they deny, deny.

    Reply
  19. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    @rushdog:
    It would be better if they come to an agreement, and imo, that’s why this has been dragging out so long, because she has been making ridiculous demands. Eventually tho, if the court has to make the decisions, she’s not going to be happy about that either. So when she doesn’t follow the orders from the court, he will either let it slide or take her back to court. This could go on for years :( He needs to just grow a pair, even if he ends up looking like a big a-hole, like Alec Baldwin does sometimes ;)

    Reply
  20. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 1:50 pm

    Khloe and Lamar Odom who have been having mariage problems due to lack of conceiving a child and his issues with his status as a pro basketball player ( can you tell I’m not a basketball fan? ). He’s been released by Dallas, and is hoping to train for the Olympic team USA. I like Khloe, she’s about the only Kardashian I consider fairly “normal”….and Lamar has a huge heart. Good luck to them both. Now if momma Kris would just butt out. (pun intended)

    Reply
  21. liv4 said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:15 pm

    This does seem to relate to K&O. Maybe tags are a thing of the past.

    Reply
  22. vickolaus said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:17 pm

    Looks like Ian missed this exclusive: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/fash-track/angelina-jolie-engagement-ring-brad-pitt-311988

    Reply
  23. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:27 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I agree but I bet they didn’t actually sat down to the table with this until recently, after the “peer recognition” season. There may have been a general agreement that the end would be now. I think since spring ‘09 he’s been trying to back away without stepping on any landmines that will hurt their images (ok his!) so the process has been slow. Then they keep bumping into promotional obligations which required public appearances and greed for attention. Think they finally came to the very end of it and are forced to deal with the details. Bet the previous dissolution looks like a cakewalk in comparison though the scenario seems similar. His m.o. and I bet that pisses her off (and I don’t blame her on that).

    Reply
  24. Debbi said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:34 pm

    Angelina just photographed wearing an engagement ring. Ian????

    Reply
  25. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:38 pm

    @vickolaus:
    Well that’s interesting. Doesn’t make any sense to me because more often than not over the last many months Pitt has looked like he couldn’t stand to be near her despite the parading around for show. His profile is awful in this picture.

    I’m going with my initial guess on this post. And I’m not into conspiracies but it wouldn’t surprise me if this is planned to make it look like one thing is going on when it’s actually the exact opposite.

    Reply
  26. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:39 pm

    Are Khloe and Lamar an A-List HW couple?

    Reply
  27. vickolaus said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    @rushdog:
    As for Pitt looking miserable with her, well I don’t think vows mean much to either one of them and this is just another act in their little production. Look at the way they are letting the cat out of the bag, pictures from a “private showing” at a museum and then an exclusive with the jeweler from THR. It is all about PR and creating a media buzz, they don’t really care for each other, if they did they would strive for their privacy. Not manipulate the media to their fullest advantage.

    Reply
  28. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 2:58 pm

    @rushdog:
    oops, no…I would say they are not.

    Reply
  29. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:01 pm

    From what I’ve read, that jewelry line hasn’t done as well as expected….so someone is trying to boost sales.

    Reply
  30. vickolaus said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:11 pm

    I also think a denial could be issued on Monday. If AJ is cast in the Ridley Scott movie by then, that is. Either way, a denial or a confirmation, it is obvious that this is a PR stunt and that they would sell their souls for good publicity.

    Reply
  31. liv4 said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:15 pm

    @rushdog:
    You got us there.

    Reply
  32. Debbi said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    New blind item on the Blind Gossip site about a long time couple getting married this year. It’s them.

    http://blindgossip.com/?p=42205

    Reply
  33. Anna said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:42 pm

    They are doing this out of desperation. Teasing about the wedding didn’t bring either the Oscar or the attention they craved and people just don’t care so the only thing left is to gain last bit of publicity is to speculate whether they’ll do another film together and actually marry. Adoptions and pregnancies aren’t interesting anymore.

    Reply
  34. payal said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:49 pm

    maybe its because im not feeling well today but everything seems weird, this breaking story, the engagement ring, this blind item. its all very sudden and rather bewildering ian we need u right now!

    Reply
  35. x said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    @rushdog:
    He does look horrible. Maybe he has no choice in this matter?

    Reply
  36. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    @Guest2:
    It is about them. I have not had time to really look at it but I believe this will be as explosive as the Sandy story and that is why Ian is writing it this way. My intuition .

    Reply
  37. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    Designer Robt. Procop who has a collection of jewelry within his company named “Style of Jolie” that Angie has been designing and selling for some while now confirmed Angie designed this ring to be an engagement ring, and Oh yea, Brad pitched in to help with the design. They are simply trying to remain relevant in the press since marriage/separation/baby news isnt’ working anymore. Eventually they will issue a joint statement that this is the case and falsely claim the press leaped to the wrong conclusion just because she was taking it for a test spin and photographed. ( at a private showing in a museum with a huge flash in the upper right corner) Not fooling us Brangie! You brought your own pap to set this story up….lol@Debbi:

    Reply
  38. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    @rushdog:
    Agree, a coach has been chosen so to speak lol someone will win, someone will lose, and this will be very nasty

    Reply
  39. payal said on April 13th, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    brads manager confirmed the engagement, what the hell?!?! i dont feel like im on the same planet anymore.

    Reply
  40. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:01 pm

    Exactly Vickoulaus. They have an open relationship as Angie herself has admitted by saying, “Fidelity is not important” and confessing to having an affair with a former hubby while with Brad in 2005. Google Youtube video Angie and JLM “is it your baby Johnny?”…..for the video of them getting it on for the paps while she was pregnant with Shiloh. They deserve one another, and I hope they do make it legal and make an effort to be real parents to the child army they have collected. Thank goodless Angie threw Goleb back when she discovered Brad wanted a little girl and not a boy….@vickolaus:

    Reply
  41. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:04 pm

    So….Ange doesn’t have a problem with Brad designing another engagement/wedding ring for her, like he did for Jen??? Is she going to write his name in blood on a t-shirt and wear it to the ceremony then? :lol: I think they would have USED this and played it up more, IF it were true, but I think someone is just trying to push this jewelry.

    Reply
  42. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    Nope, sorry….that was so well fit but for the A-List classification. The bubble butt got me. lol@rushdog:

    Reply
  43. Debbi said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:10 pm

    Blind Gossip just confirmed their item “Solved”. People just issued confirmation by their manager.

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20587035,00.html

    Reply
  44. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    Wow, so they “dated” for seven years, adopted three kids, and had three “bio” kids, and just now announced they are engaged. At this rate they should have a (lets hope legal this time) wedding ceremony by the time Brad draws retirement Social Security payments…..could work…@Debbi:

    Reply
  45. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    When’s the wedding? ;)

    Reply
  46. Violet said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:20 pm

    Why are they bothering with an engagement, for God’s sake? After seven years! The endless drum roll continues…why didn’t they just quietly get married? If they’re truly sincere about, and confident in their relationship, they should just do it, and stop telegraphing their every pathetic move. How long would this “relationship” exist if all the cameras left, and the money dried up?

    Reply
  47. Togi said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:20 pm

    LOL … oh my goodness. Looks like the joke is on us. The Brange getting married. hahahahahaha. Gotta admit, this is actually pretty funny. I think we’re all just a bunch of suckers! :)

    Reply
  48. Violet said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:21 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Exactly!

    Reply
  49. Anna said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:27 pm

    Lainey speculates they will marry in France around the Cannes festival to get more buzz for his film. Of course how else to promote their films!

    Reply
  50. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    Things are moving fast and furious on Friday the 13th! I don’t believe they’ll ever get married. (And I have to say they look weird together in that People picture too, esp him, although I liked the way she looked that night). This is a PR stunt as vickolaus suggested. Prediction: someone’s going to break off this engagement and it would be her dumping him and then she doesn’t look like the victim. She will never let that card be played for her as it was for her predecessor. Her image has to be the strong female it goes with her narrative. So is this the creative marketing set-up?

    And as for the manager confirming it…when M and GR divorced his camp was playing it as though he wasn’t taking her money, he said he didn’t want it. Then oops! M’s longtime publicist Liz R. spills the beans on the actual settlement which was one of the largest in celebrity break-ups. Then M comes out with a press release saying that the information wasn’t supposed to be public. Publicist in error, oops, but Madonna got her story out, no accident.

    And my point is these people will do what they have to do for their clients. If it means they’re wrong or blamed somewhere down the road so-be-it, goes with the territory.

    Now this gets interesting.

    Reply
  51. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:29 pm

    @Violet:
    Exactly!

    Reply
  52. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:33 pm

    @Kate:
    It wouldn’t surprise me at all if they marry. If they are both bi as rumored and have their action on the side then they are the perfect couple. They’re a big happy family on the outside (to some anyway) but in private they co-parent while living their own lives. There aren’t many women who would say fidelity is not absolutely essential to a relationship and it seems brad agrees. I imagine it’s not an arrangement that would work for a lot of people. Also, who’s to say that any marriage that takes place would even be real. Just thinking of that sham marriage clue. Or, maybe they are getting married for legal reasons, i.e., can’t testify against your own spouse.

    But I was wondering about Pax and all the talk about his birth mother wanting him back and now the museum outing with just him. Do you think there’s a possibility they would return him to Vietnam? Could that be the blockbuster and the marriage is to deflect from that?

    Sorry, just thinking out loud here.

    Reply
  53. Dream said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:34 pm

    i have not read everything yet sorry. but my take.
    told to watch a game naked sounds like church of Scientology and the smiths. sounds like a blue pill for a gay guy to me.
    and nothing to make a marriage look like its whole again to bring in a new baby.

    Reply
  54. joanne said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:51 pm

    @Debbi:
    They are getting desperate for attention. i hope they marry so she can quit tainting other actors.

    Reply
  55. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:52 pm

    Bringing Togi’s guess from the “Abdominal Thrust” post forward. Wonder if some of the PR coming out in the last couple of days is the grand opening in April, appearing calm and normal, sewing PR pieces together while getting ready to do battle.

    Togi said on April 5th, 2012 at 5:04 pm
    Quilting machines … Sewing the pieces together
    lazy swan golf … Making its grand opening in April
    Fooling the bladder cops … Going to great lengths to appear clean and doing things naturally
    Easter bunny vs genghis khan… Getting ready to do battle
    Recipes for leftover ham… many different ways to be prepared
    Abdominal thrusts… Vague description of choking technique, can be self-administered.
    late night heimlich maneuver – very specific, last hour effort to prevent death

    Reply
  56. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 4:57 pm

    @Kate:
    where’s the Sandy story? I know she posted a couple of threads ago but it was about stars being owned. Is there something in another thread?

    Reply
  57. joanne said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    Pitt designed the ring? How original. :lol:

    Reply
  58. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:06 pm

    @Guest2:
    OK I haven’t followed the Pax stuff lately, but even if there were illegalities in that adoption to return him to Vietnam at this point, even to his bio parent…I just can’t believe that’s the best thing for the child at this point. Aren’t those adoptions binding and irrevocable?

    Reply
  59. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:09 pm

    @vickolaus:
    @Violet:
    Excellent posts by both of you.

    Reply
  60. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:11 pm

    @rushdog:
    I don’t know. There was a thread at ff where some were speculating that the tabloid talk of aj being upset that his bio mother wanted him back was a precursor to them trying to return him because he’s a problem child. I hope it isn’t true. That would be a horrible thing to do to the child.

    Reply
  61. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    @rushdog:
    I thought kate meant the sandra bullock story but maybe not.

    Reply
  62. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:20 pm

    Ok, The square defies a tree not 2012, what would you say this means? Is IAN saying, “I defy anyone to disprove my statements” , what do you think?

    Reply
  63. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:20 pm

    @joanne:
    I know! He’s a one trick pony, just like his blushing bride to be. I can’t wait to see how long the chain is on his blood vial.

    Reply
  64. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:24 pm

    @Kate:
    ?? What are you posting about? (maybe it’s because I’ve had a glass of wine…”the square deifes a tree not 2012.”

    Reply
  65. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:24 pm

    @Kate:
    He should be saying “I defy anyone to understand my statements!” :)

    Reply
  66. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:38 pm

    @rushdog:
    That is not important to this, it is very old. I can not figure out who the Birds and Jabs represent in all this, and who Badaboum sybolizes, and then I wonder, who the hello is Bippy. See how confusing this is IAN……STICKING MY TONGUE OUT AT YOU!!!LOL

    Reply
  67. liv4 said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:51 pm

    So now Ian has added — breaking update on engagement coming soon — to the above post. HMMM.

    Reply
  68. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:53 pm

    @rushdog:
    Ians Twitter, last night he asked on there who do you like better, Angelina, Courtney, or the Birds, then FRI the 13 Is your lucky Day.. reading through them looking for hints, remember when he told you he loved that you always saw a clue in everything , even the travel stuff, has to mean something if he used her name because they are all ramblings of a mad man looking at porn , haha , that or IAN , is playing us, was drunk and horny, dreaming of Angus, CL , and some trannies and cross dressers..hmm, come to think of it ANGIE AND CL, nah could not be? Could it lol jk but there was that sandwich Brange has with TH, she is my guess, but it sort of looks like Ian is saying the meat was mexican Columbian? Is that really female, or man made? Do not look at work and definitely not if you are offended by Hustler. Of course IAN could just be partying to hard over his PASSOVER. EWWW. I do not see any wedding hints in there though, unless that is the. HHS Band ??

    Reply
  69. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 5:54 pm

    I’m still trying to figure out what naked basketball has to do with this….sigh

    If a player is really talented, then he will force a coach to make him a bigger part of the offense, and his raw talent will help him outplay his opponents on any given night.

    However, there are plenty of mitigating factors that play a role in whether a player long on raw hoops talent will be able to translate that skill into high-end fantasy production. Who his coach is, what style of

    Reply
  70. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    I’m way out of my league here. I’ll come back later to see if I can make sense of anything. Maybe I’ll drink first, that should help.

    Reply
  71. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Same here Party, I can not figure out what of this means , it all seems so disconnected. I am with Rush, I wish IAN, would get back to being that pitbull reporter that went up against all the threats when he wrote the early books on Kurtz death. Making a murder accusation is much more serious than revealing what a trashy drugged up, orgy filled, whacked out life Brangelina live. Come on IAN, LOL , strap em back on buddy, we are all exhausted!!!!!!!

    Reply
  72. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:24 pm

    @liv4:
    Well, they have to get married, can not play games with the kids hearts like that now, can they? That would be unforgiveable. I hear their ship sinking. old married couple.

    Reply
  73. Tetta said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:29 pm

    @Guest2:

    I will follow your example. A big drink and perhaps everything will be clear :roll:

    Reply
  74. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    Now I hope they let the nannies go, and actually be a regular family?

    Reply
  75. Tetta said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    On a more basic level, could it be easier to divorce than to separate from a relation ? i know married people can´t testify against each other bur beside that ? Shared custody of the
    children ? Money and other material belongings are easyto share, but how to share six kids ?

    Reply
  76. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:44 pm

    This whole thing is weird. If they had become engaged/married back when they looked like they were happy…but now, he has looked less than happy so many times since I started following this, why become engaged now? Really doesn’t make any sense to me. For every one picture that looks “happier” there are more that look less than happy to the point of misery. And then there are the videos where he barely touches her. Or drags her up the academy red carpet by her wrist, I mean come on, really Brad? This is what you;ve got?

    Reply
  77. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:49 pm

    @Tetta:
    I am also wondering WHO is playing WHO now. We talked about how can you break up, if you aren’t really together, awhile back. If they get married, it should give Brad a leg to stand on with the kids. It just seems like an odd day and way to announce something so “important”, from a couple of drama/pr queens, imo. It seems very anticlimactic.

    Reply
  78. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    @rushdog:
    Are they playing a game of chicken? :lol: At this point, I don’t think Ange could do any better than Brad :(

    Reply
  79. Tetta said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:54 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    UTC and rushdog, I´m so glad to hear that you think this is odd too. Because then i´m not
    alone. I got scared for a while.

    Reply
  80. Capri said on April 13th, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    I wonder whether the bride or the groom will be doing the negotiating with the tabloids for the wedding pics? Morticia, in her black gown, Gomez in his tux, and all the little kiddies. Poor Jane, her permanant role now until she dies will be babysitting Morticia everytime Gomez has to be absent.

    Reply
  81. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:10 pm

    I noticed on the title where Ian added, ” *****Breaking Update on “engagement” coming soon*****”, the word engagement is in parenthesis which indicates it’s questionable. Hmmmmmm, is there more to this story than what the Jolie-Pitt’s put out there? Is this a REAL engagement? or a faux one like so much of their lives as partners? I wonder what Ian knows that we don’t…..yet? lol As Kate said, Strap ‘em back on Buddy and give us some answers!! We already know Brad is probably full out gay but calling himself bi, we know Angie is lesbian who prefers to out herself as bi, and we know they have a child army being raised by a plethora of nannies. Remember the story about Brad running out of the bedroom wearing a diaper while two female voices were heard in the bedroom imitating babies crying? Good heavens! Brad admitted Z nearly choked to death because he was higher than a Georgia pine ….what is left that can not be told?

    Reply
  82. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:10 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Not in HW or the arts. In politics and professional sports the right “selection” would be a leg up (or out :) ). Who that would be, I don’t know, but I think those two arenas would hold a candidate.

    This turn of events is either something that will be turned around at some point or the “order…and advised” came from somewhere else, such as a corporation (or investors – read $$) Sandy suggested. I agree with what she said on the thread of a couple of weeks ago. The image is a facade for the corporation to make money, the players are just puppets. An illusion. I’ll bet every mag/rag has them on the cover next week.

    Reply
  83. benjaminbutton14 said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:12 pm

    Brad and Ang are engaged apparently she is wearing a massive diamond

    Reply
  84. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:14 pm

    It’s also been told by several sources on many other sites that Angie has stated she has her sex hook-ups in hotel rooms and that was proven by the maid at the Waldorf Astoria in NYC during the shooting of SALT while Brad and the kids and the nannies stayed on Long Island and Angie had her infamous Black Rubber Sheets and Sex Toys romp with a speech tutor….so does the hotel mentioned in the previous clue have to do with Angie having another one of her sick sexual romps? with a basketball team? lol? My mind is spinning Big Guy….give up some information puleeze???

    Reply
  85. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:18 pm

    Wow, if your intuition is right and this turns out to be as explosive as the Sandy Bullock story….WOW…I’ll be keeping a close eye on what Ian updates from now on….Angie can’t adopt a child to cover up her dirt though….so maybe that is what this engagement is about?? AGH! I wish I knew….@Kate:

    Reply
  86. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Dennis Rodman is the only basketball player I can think of that would do something that gross! “Do” Ange, that is.

    Reply
  87. Simms said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:20 pm

    OK after having 2 drinks for my friday the 13th start of the weekend. Heres butt i got:watching
    basketball butt naked and to give up smoking. no clue who this is.Butt very funny.
    Brangie engaged: aww soo romantic are they already married? once they are “married”
    can pitt now legally put her in a 5150 hold.

    Reply
  88. AmaryEllis said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:21 pm

    Something seems SUPER fishy here. DEFLECTION – so much pr on so many stories in so short a time: Pax birth mom, this morning the announcement that B & A were planning on making another movie together, then this afternoon the announcement of an engagement – stinks of trying to cover something up. The story of them making a movie together didn’t even run a full news cycle and then they come out with this? She was photographed earlier in the week wearing the ring – but no one picked up the story till today? Something else is going on . . . .

    Reply
  89. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:21 pm

    LOL IAN~!! ” Ian Halperin ‏ @IanUnderCover
    Reply RetweetedRetweet
    To Brangie: Marriage is a three ring circus: engagement ring, wedding ring, and suffering.

    Amen to that Buddy. Looks like Brad will pay for his Bad Behavour for the rest of his life now, no wonder he looks like a dirty old homeless man….

    Reply
  90. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    There was once a rumor that Angie and Madge hooked up for a threesome with Rod in a NYC hotel. Angie does love those hotels. I suppose Brad was busy smoking his Hash and the little blue pills weren’t working so Angie had to go elsewhere…..ya think?? @Up the Coast:

    Reply
  91. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol: :lol: :lol: Very good!

    Reply
  92. payal said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:32 pm

    like i said im ill so i may well be delirious but this is an absolute headfuck!, seriously i did not see this coming it is bewildering, 6 years later when they are at the worst point, now they decide to get married, doesn’t this feel like how it is was when they first got together, the hot news and on every newspaper and magazine, it seems like this was the only thing left lol. now im even more convinced jen/justin is super real and getting serious (could they already be married?)

    ive been reading forum comments and people just do not care, some thought they were already married and others are like huh why now after all this time. i am excited to hear what ian has to say but i feel it might be him saying yes they will get married but just for publicity, hopefully the engagement will break up.

    Reply
  93. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:33 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Ugh!!! :shock: Just the thought of it…

    Reply
  94. AmaryEllis said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:40 pm

    The Ridley Scott movie they are supposed to be in is called The Counselor

    Reply
  95. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:54 pm

    @payal:
    Sorry to hear you don’t feel well, the flu? Glad to have you posting here under the circumstances. Hope you feel better soon!

    Reply
  96. payal said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:58 pm

    @rushdog:

    thanks, its just a flu, my throats got the worst of it.

    Reply
  97. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 7:58 pm

    @Simms:
    5150 – maybe so. How long would he have to wait and I wonder if the public would catch on.

    Reply
  98. Capri said on April 13th, 2012 at 8:26 pm

    @Simms:
    Now that’s a thought.
    @rushdog:
    Besides a few of the loons, (reading at Ted’s, most loons sound like they have moved on to that Twilight bunch),would the public care? Like a lot of you, I’ve been here and there today and there is a majority of disinterest. With the recent leg bombing and the spaced out SAG hand clasping fiascos, most posters and the public seem to already think that she was using something. 5150, would anyone be surprised?

    Reply
  99. Up the Coast said on April 13th, 2012 at 8:37 pm

    He would have the power to put her away, once they are married. But maybe he thinks she will want him again, if he’s a married man :lol:

    Reply
  100. juliette said on April 13th, 2012 at 8:47 pm

    @Debbi:
    congratulations to Brange and commiserations to Ian, don’t think he saw this coming so much for his insider info. I know people will now want to trash this engagement as false, some PR thing etc but I really struggle to believe they would both put their 6 children through this, I refuse to think they are both that heartless and I think Ian it may be time to move on and put it to rest & accept they may actually be pretty happy in their relationship

    Reply
  101. world's going nuts! said on April 13th, 2012 at 8:57 pm

    Wonder how George is taking the news. He can make Brad crazy with his love technique, I’m certain! But then, Brad is nearing the half century mark, so George may want a younger model.
    Wonder how Jenny Shimuzu is taking this? She probably has taken all she can from Angie, and has found someone younger and more together.
    Wonder how the gay community is taking the news? Did they know all along they were being used by someone who’s the definitive user?
    Does George, Jenny and the gay community really care? Would it be good riddance, in their opinion?
    Btw, some other blogs are unanimously negative toward them. Many consider them passe! After all, age makes one sag in many places, and shrivel in others. BP was already small to begin with. So now, he can fuggedaboudit, and can relax and play the role of a parent. It’s what goes on in fantasyland.
    After all, he’ll retire in 2014. And we know he keeps his word!

    Reply
  102. joanne said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:09 pm

    Soon they will be that boring married couple. :lol: :lol: They should have married a few kids ago.

    Reply
  103. joanne said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:26 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol:

    Reply
  104. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    Ok, so one or both are banging a shemale , deflection?The person in question is part of their sandwich, and is of Mexican Ann Columbian descent , not sure how JF fits in , but I do remember how you met him .lol, hmmm, is someone partaking of Abhors pizza? Lol

    Reply
  105. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:38 pm

    @Kate:
    ha, hate these things , that is Antiwar pizza?

    Reply
  106. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    Let the jokes begin…..”for her, this ring could double as a belt”…

    http://www.hollyscoop.com/

    Reply
  107. Patty Anne said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:20 pm

    Ménage à trois is a French term which originally described a domestic arrangement in which three people having sexual relations occupy the same household …” Could the meat of this sandwich be an occupant of the household? Holly? The bodyguard that supposedly Brad was caught delecto in flagrante? Interesting.
    @Kate:

    Reply
  108. Guest2 said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:22 pm

    They’ve shacked up for 7 years, have 6 children, he’s pushing 50, she’s pushing 40, they have three prior marriages between them and they announce an engagement as a future promise? They should just get married already and stfu about it. Do they have to milk every detail of their lives for every drop of publicity they can get out of it? Are they really that desperate to remain in the limelight? And if they cared so much about the children they would have married a long time ago. in private, to give those children stability and security. They’re a devious pair whose every move is carefully calculated and I’m certain there’s more to this than just two people in love wanting to get married. It will come out eventually.

    @juliette:

    Reply
  109. iwasanon said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    Just getting caught up with this exciting news. I’ve got to read through all the posts thoroughly but it definitely seems like deflection to me.
    How was Cynthia Pett-Dante able to keep a straight face when saying ““A promise for the future.” I mean come on, for a couple that’s supposedly been together 7 years and has 6 kids.
    A promise for what? To always be on time with the child support checks? To never be late when exchanging the kids? LOL.

    Question is what is the deflection for?
    Seems early to be PR for Cannes. That doesn’t even start until May 16.
    Could it be she decided to settle the court case and that will be announced next week? That could be the company, Graham King of GKFilms and Film District pushing this to cover up the settlement as much as possible.

    btw – Ian’s clue above didn’t say the therapy involved watching the game “together” in the nude. Not sure if that means anything (or if anyone mentioned this above).

    Reply
  110. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:27 pm

    @Guest2:
    LOL. Some tabloid had the story private wedding, in France, for the kids, who knows if it will even be legal . Angelina has made it well known she abhors the idea of being someone’s wife, but probably loves the idea of putting it out there that he got down on bender knee. Puts the ball back in her court, speaking of, there is A naked person, man maybe after a vagioplasty (?) laying on the bed, Carmelo Anthony Fan , watching a NBA game. Dont look, take my word for it. Lol. Kind of reminds me of the photo up top, except the one up top u could show Grandma Betty, and the other one is Brange slime. Now, does anyone remember a few months ago Ted saying that he spoke to a friend of Brad and Angies at a party (wonder if that was the one IAN talked about in a interview that tried to get him drunk and told him not to write his book lol) hmm, well told Ted that they ate just fine, they are going to do it their way no matter what .paraphrased..sounded like they were being pressured by someone and were refusing at that time to What is now happening..maybe , so, is the Bride wearing white?, cause my mommy said…lol
    L

    Reply
  111. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I don’t think so, look at each half and the difference, and the fries, and the analogy to O&A….I suspect HOLLY looks like a nun compared to all this. Lol

    Reply
  112. iwasanon said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:35 pm

    @Kate:
    What about those basketball reality shows, I think one is called basketball wives. Was anyone ever told to watch a game naked for therapy? I don’t follow basketball so no ideas really.

    Reply
  113. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:36 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Good point, and in the raw gives a gross discription of the other in the nude watching the game. hmm in the raw, what does that mean besides the obvious?

    Reply
  114. Kate said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:59 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    It does. We usually see split announcements made late on. Friday to avoid the news hitting the mainstream press. You would think an engagement annoucement would be made early in the week , right, so everyone could fawn all over them.

    Reply
  115. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 10:59 pm

    If they cared so much about the children they wouldn’t be trotted out and paraded around for the press when the need arises. To me that says something about heartlessness. If a “promise for the future’ is what they’ve decided to do for the right reasons then I hope they find happiness and security for themselves and the children. I kind of shrug my shoulders at the 7 years because I know someone who had a family and waited 15 years to marry. I also know someone who was engaged for 15 years and may still be engaged for all I know, lol. Both are good people. I’ve been married for a long time and believe in marriage. Diferent ways for different people.

    I don’t think they would do this just for publicity. Deflection yes. As pr for “something” problematic that might be out there, yes. But straight publicity seeking, no I don’t really think so. The media attention is not the same as it used to be but it’s still there. After this amount of time an engagement/marriage of a couple their ages isn’t going to excite the general public, imo. It would have back in ‘07 or ‘08. I’d say out-of-date at this point.

    What I find so strange about the timing here is that they haven’t looked consistently happy in a long, long time. Hope they haven’t fallen into the trap of thinking they’ll find happiness or rekindle something by getting married, that’s quite the long shot. And in terms of “looking happy,” I can appreciate the tedious nature of red carpets and being photographed, the annoyance of being followed, the many pressures of the industry and so on. But, there are other couples who have weathered those situations, look more consistently happy despite pressures and have not deteriorated in their appearance so quickly. Maybe it’s easier to do nothing (as in a status quo ‘promise for the future’) than it is to find a solution to a situation. IMO there’s something more to this…the picture is off to me…not the great love story that it seems. Will we ever truly know…who knows?

    Reply
  116. rushdog said on April 13th, 2012 at 11:07 pm

    @iwasanon:
    Good catch on the not watching “together” in the nude. I don’t think anyone caught that.

    Reply
  117. checkmate said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:51 am

    BA engagement should be music to this coven. they are STUCK WITH EACH OTHER according to this cult. there should be JOY AND SHOUTING FROM THE ROOF TOPS!!!!! oh, wait. the joy was supposed to be the announcement of the breakup. my bad.

    Reply
  118. checkmate said on April 14th, 2012 at 2:59 am

    jenhags are dealing with fantasies are nothing.

    Reply
  119. guest 3 said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:03 am

    they threw you for a loop. it’s quite funny when you read the first posts on this thread it’s about , the separation will be announced soon, they are drawing up the papers to split assets and custody of the kids. Now we find out they’re getting married. He finally put a ring on it. A ring I might add took him a year to design with the jeweler for that perfect diamond.

    Reply
  120. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:11 am

    @checkmate:
    Hmmmm, that is odd, I have a feeling someone in Brange camp keeps pushing that refresh button, lol, I wonder if Brad breathed a sigh of relief to see that no one world wide, blinked. Chuckling. Plop.plop.plop.plop.splat.that is the sound of this news. North Korea. Yes, that should be raising some blood pressure. I think their gay friends are burning their pictures tonight too. :)

    Reply
  121. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:12 am

    @guest 3:
    Still drawing up papers. Lol

    Reply
  122. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:16 am

    @checkmate:
    What fantasy is that, they love Justin and hate Brad. Brad is probably on the phone get counseled by his best friend Jen ;) lol Don’t believe all that PR garbage, never what it seems.

    Reply
  123. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:18 am

    @rushdog:
    I agree, too bad they have to sleep with other people to keep it together . I see Will and Nada came out defending their relationship, why do they think anyone cares if they split or not,oh the cult, right.

    Reply
  124. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:21 am

    Ok, before I go to bed, did anyone buy stock in her jewelry line before this was announced? No tips? Darn , where is MD when you need him?

    Reply
  125. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 4:22 am

    @Tetta:
    Raw hoop- deceptively simple-engagement. As one of their gay fans said, engaged could mean a week a year or a decade, we could all be married by then. They are the masters of deception, agree with Rush though, this is not just publicity, so unless the reason comes out, will anyone really care? I think IAN has something else though. Tick tock.

    Reply
  126. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 5:07 am

    Ian isn´t completely wrong. Perhaps there is a connection between Hoop and engagement rings at least if you look at this link http://www.thefreedictionary.com/hoop It´s almost 11.00AM , Saturday in Sweden and after a long nights sleep I read all comments again and I can only laugh about this engagement. The most odd thing in this clue is that Ian doesn´t seem to know about it until after he posted the clue.

    And who cares if they are engaged or not ? Perhaps their children but the sad thing is they don´t know why.

    I hope all of you in the US have a well deserved night´s sleep. For us in Europe and further east away who are awake again, yesterday´s news are amusing. Or perhaps I would say at least I find them amusing :)

    Reply
  127. Violet said on April 14th, 2012 at 5:35 am

    @rushdog:
    Thanks, Rushdog! It occurs to me that Angie and Brad are simply bored. Can the end really be far in sight–wedding, or no wedding?

    Reply
  128. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:55 am

    Right now I long for something else to happen. It doesn´t necessarily need to be about entertainment but some good news about J&J would be nice. They could go out and promote the movie they are planning or just go out and let the paps take some pictures. They have actually gotten a little boring too. It seems like they try to do a thing about not to be seen. Anything that can move the focus to something else would be satisfactory.

    Reply
  129. Guest2 said on April 14th, 2012 at 8:17 am

    @Tetta:
    If they do it now they will be accused of trying to upstage the engagement so best they continue to be boring and keep their privacy. But it will be interesting to see what develops with them. Maybe the Greek wedding rumors are true (I don’t really think so) and they are the ones who’ve been upstaged. Now that an engagement has been announced, regardless of when they actually wed, if j/j announce an engagement or a wedding it will like they’re trying to upstage brangie, at least in the minds of loons.

    I think the brand will get married because it’s the perfect arrangement for two bisexual people with 6 kids who don’t believe in fidelity. They know each other’s secrets and what they’ve got in each other. The engagement has given them a lot of publicity (it’s being talked about on our local news), the wedding will give them more publicity /money via photos. I still believe there’s something else here that we don’t know about. Maybe they think their careers have suffered because of how they got together and they think that marriage will elevate them in terms of respectability and make them the king and queen of HW again. They should take a good look in a mirror if they want to know the real problem. All the pix shown of them in the news clips of the engagement are old pics when they looked younger. I have seen no current photos of them looking like druggies and street bums.

    Reply
  130. Brown Sugar said on April 14th, 2012 at 8:21 am

    Oh looky looky the delusional hags still at it. Whether you like it or not Brad the man has put a nail in the ex-wife’s coffin. Now go marry your little Mcstumpie doll and leave my Family alone. The triangle is ova.

    Reply
  131. rushdog said on April 14th, 2012 at 8:31 am

    For what it’s worth, when I make guesses on this puzzle they are based largely on the previous posts and where I think Ian’s been going with this very long series of riddle blinds. A year ago and up through the beginning of summer 2011 I think generally we had the right idea. Can I admit that I could have guessed the exact opposite of what Ian was suggesting, particularly in the last 6-8 months? Absolutely. He hasn’t pinged any poster as “bingo” in many months. I have to say the dynamic between them in many public appearances and photographs since last summer would never have suggested to me that they would both happily commit to an engagement and a “promise for the future” (lol). Again, I have to say I would have expected that four years ago when they appeared consistently happier.

    Reply
  132. rushdog said on April 14th, 2012 at 8:57 am

    @Tetta:
    That’s a good idea with the hoops I never thought of that. My personal favorite: “A large wooden, plastic, or metal ring, especially one used as a plaything or for trained animals to jump through.” !!

    It’s hard for me to re-set my guesses once I’ve gotten to a certain point. Ian choses the wording carefully and, again, I believe “ordered” and “advised” were chosen for a reason. And also relationship counseling “troublesome differences and repeating patterns of distress.” Considering hoop as a ring the clues could probably be read as the news of yesterday. There have been a few posts since the end of last year that have suggested the end of the media triangle (although some also suggested to me some type of exposure of them). Maybe that’s what this puzzle has been leading to all along – the end of the media triangle. The clues seemed to suggest that at least one party seemed to want out of it. And ALL THREE OF THEM were a part of it. I don’t think JA was just latching on to them or they to her. Think it was an agreed upon arrangement moved along by the handlers for maximum exposure for their clients.

    Back at the end of the first series of clues in Feb 2011 and many of us were disappointed, Ian posted with us commenting the outcome. He hasn’t done that this time which indicates to me he’s not concerned with the result. That maybe in their three ring circus this was no surprise to him. The clue guesses simply may have been wrong. I do wish we’d get a heads up or down now and then!!

    Reply
  133. liv4 said on April 14th, 2012 at 9:21 am

    @Brown Sugar:
    I’m pretty sure Jen would bathe him, wash his hair, find him a clean onsie and escort him down the aisle just to be rid of any association with his sorry ass.

    Reply
  134. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 9:42 am

    @Guest2:

    You are right, it´s a comfortable arrangement and many Hollywood couples have lived like this. Their marriages probably are much more stable than the couples who married each other because of what they thought was love. Brad still did a bad choose. He didn´t have to choose Angelina who very obviously has a problem with mental illness. And she also seems to be unable to take care of the kids. It´s a bad thing when a mother tries to manipulate her children. What she does with Shilooh and the gender issue is unforgivable.

    Reply
  135. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 9:48 am

    @Brown Sugar:

    At last, we have something in common. I guess the fact the triangle is over is appreciated by at least 95 % of the regular guests :lol:

    Reply
  136. Brown Sugar said on April 14th, 2012 at 9:49 am

    Oh my gawd, how would ian the Pig explain this. I bet he is with Jen the hag frothing at the mouth and crying in the ocean. It could’t happen to a more deserving pair.

    Reply
  137. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:02 am

    @rushdog:

    When Ian uses words like “ordered, advised, relationship counseling , troublesome differences and repeating patterns of distress ” I believe someone has told them to show a more clean and stable side of themselves. It can be the social authorities who want them to take care of their children or their agents who can´t find any movies for them. But if we follow Ian´s clues over time he has insisted that AJ and BP no longer is a couple. The “Good Bye clue” marked that something was over. Perhaps he meant the triangle.

    Reply
  138. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @liv4:

    Jennifer would probably do anything, how uncomfortable it was, to not be a part of the triangle
    anymore. Perhaps she has profited from it too but now it´s no longer a way to stay in the news because of Brangelina.

    Reply
  139. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:02 am

    When you sit back and take a long look at this story you clearly see it is just that: A story. Nothing new but the ring and that could easily be faked as well. We know they’ve been saying they’d marry “when everyone can legally marry” as their personal stand in support for the gay community. Also they’ve said no marriage paper was needed because having children together is a bigger form of committment than a ceremony and/or ring. So…..all that has changed is the photo of Angie wearing a ring built by her company’s manufacturer from her design “Styles of Jolie”….It’s just more PR….and no wedding date is set or even planned to BE set anytime in the future.

    And….the official statement by Brad’s manager was, “as of now, the engagement is simply a promise for the future”. And we ALL know just how good Brad’s promises are….zero!

    Reply
  140. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:04 am

    liv, you forgot Jen would make Brad change that nasty diaper he’s been wearing for seven years too!@liv4:

    Reply
  141. rushdog said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:06 am

    @Tetta:
    When I go back and read Ian’s recent posts (not our comments) I can see where he may have leading this puzzle to yesterday’s conclusion. I’m just trying to understand Ian’s postings.

    Exes are exes for a reason – that’s the “goodbye” picture and could mean that possibility with an ex for him is dead and gone.

    Staying Erect…xtranormal app – was clearly about him blue eyes crying and bound by an image prison and a blurred image. Perceived as hetero but really bi- or full on? That’s what I really think this boils down to. The photo on this suggests to me that the female tired of it all, it’s tedious, shit or get off the pot.

    And then there are the two choking posts. What was the heimlich maneuver and who are the urine police? I don’t really think this is drug testing.

    If the relationship has been an arrangement, as so many are, he may have realized that remaining together was the best thing (option) for him especially considering the children. An engagement doesn’t necessarily change a living arrangement whatever that truly is, could still be sleeping on other sides of the mansion. Who would ever know. If they truly live a private life (which they have not) it’s not anyone’s business.

    A funny story: years ago one of my children came home from a friends house and said “you know, the parents don’t sleep in the same bedroom.” I thought “oh boy” and explained to her that could happen for many reasons including their work schedule and that it was their business and not ours, many people live differently.

    If the Brand has decided this is what they will do I hope they have a private wedding in France, remain there and keep the children out of the media. Truly keep it private and stop with the media whoring when it suits their needs. And I would say the same thing of Aniston.

    Reply
  142. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:12 am

    rush, I’ve been saying all three were involved in the PR Circus known as The Triangle for over a year now. It became clear when one noticed the ups and downs of each entity were timed in such a way that they didn’t conflict with the other. The news would come out when one entity wished publicity and the other entity would be “MIA” while that took place, then sides would switch allowing the other entity PR time. I don’t think there ever was a Triangle ( as Jennifer is recently quoted as having said), but that it was manufactured by the press and the loons for personal agendas. The most relevant parts of information about the innerworkings of the people involved have mostly been ignored in favor of what some wished the truth to be but was not. I think they have finally figured out a way between them with their advisors of course , to put permanently to bed any inuendo of there being a Triangle once and for all. Brad Pitt is with Angelina Jolie because he put himself in a vulnerable position and is now in a committment of shared children. So be it. He is responsible for the welfare of seven people ( I included psycho Angie), and Jennifer has been moving forward from the day she filed for a divorce from Brad Pitt. She is too composed, successful and glowingly happy to have ever looked back at the “homeless man wearing onesies”….@rushdog:

    Reply
  143. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:27 am

    Exactly Tetta. I think all three tired of the publicity surrounding their every move because of the public assumption of there being an emotional connection between the three aka The Triangle. When it began to effect the success of their projects I believe Brad and Angie decided it was not a useful tool any longer and made a move to see it ended. As long as they could profit from it by all the emotional publicity and loon actions it was okay with them obviously. Jennifer was just there by chance, attached to their run away bus by having been Brad’s wife and did not have a say in it’s origination nor it’s ending. The fact that this engagement was announced by Brad’s manager with the phrase, “as of now, the engagement is simply a promise for the future” speaks volumns in itself. It’s nothing but words and photos and a big The End for the Triangle….for which I’m sure Jennifer is extremely happy.@Tetta:

    Reply
  144. rushdog said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:33 am

    @Patty Anne:
    You’ve posted a couple of excellent posts here today. I think he needed JA to make the switch necessary for his situation. In the end JA appears to have said f/u. Good for her. The magager’s statement is completely Brad-speak.

    I’m still trying to understand Halperinese!! I hate the photo on this thread, that butt popping up everytime is tiring!

    Reply
  145. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:36 am

    Thank you, and as for Helperinese, good luck! I’ve been following Ian for around five years now and without the help of all of you excellent posters I’d not have gotten one clue to his meanings. I’d love one day to sit Ian down and give him a truth serum and spend a few hours just asking questions that have accumulated in my head over those years. But it’s fun! and it’s good company sharing the chase with such great people as we have here.@rushdog:

    Reply
  146. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:49 am

    @Tetta:
    :lol: The jolie/pitss are jumping through hoops to appease their owners?

    Reply
  147. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:52 am

    @Guest2:
    I believe the media is paid to promote them heavily. She is making the UN look worse so they threw the loons a lifesaver to keep them posting their poison.

    Reply
  148. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:54 am

    @liv4:
    :lol:
    This BS person sounds more disturbed with every post.

    Reply
  149. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 11:56 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Could be he likes dirty diapers. :lol:

    Reply
  150. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 12:47 pm

    LOL, that’s my theory also. Jolie loves her sexual enemas and it appears Brad does as well…Ewwwww@joanne:

    Reply
  151. Guest2 said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:15 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    Jen has nothing to do with this except in your sick mind. She moved on a long time ago, now it’s time for you and your family to do the same. Please get over your obsession with a woman who divorced brad 7 years ago, it’s really not healthy. And just so you understand, jen has it all, with or without a man. She didn’t have to hitch her wagon to a man and then hang on for dear life because she’s afraid to be alone. And she didn’t have to collect a bunch of innocent children to trap a man. Unlike brad’s future wife who couldn’t survive without a man to hang onto. Angie’s weak, Jen is strong. Jen must laugh every time she looks at the drug addled old peepaw who looks like he should be living under a bridge and then thanks her lucky stars she is where she is.

    Reply
  152. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:18 pm

    I am happy for them :) They should have done this long ago. They don’t really seem that excited about it, but they don’t seem to be that excited about ANYTHING, imo. This will give Brad more control, in a legal way, not in a sub/dom way ;) :lol:

    Shouldn’t all you weirdo/haters be at those Brangelooney sites, singing and dancing? :lol: Cuz it’s not over till YOU ALL sing!

    Reply
  153. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:20 pm

    @Guest2:
    I agree…..Jen was probably so happy to get this slug OFF her couch, long ago :roll:

    Reply
  154. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    @liv4:
    CDAN’s “take” on this is priceless :)

    Reply
  155. Violet said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    @rushdog:

    You said: I’m still trying to understand Halperinese!! I hate the photo on this thread, that butt popping up everytime is tiring!

    I hate the photo, too, don’t know why but every time I return to this site it jars me a little bit more.

    Reply
  156. Guest2 said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    She probably told him to take that couch with him so she could buy one that was comfortable! And I am happy for them too. Like I said many months ago, now brad can legally have her committed the next time she flips out. I wonder if he has bambi on speed dial.

    Reply
  157. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    @Violet:
    Look at the bright side, it could be a picture of jolies no butt or madonnas pancake butt. This is a healthy nice to look at butt.

    Reply
  158. Guest2 said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    HRH, we’re tired of the tush, no ifs, ands or butts about it! Can we have a pretty picture for the engagement update, please?

    Reply
  159. guest 3 said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    Who cares? there are almost 2000 articles on Google about the engagement. People magazine scraped their planned cover story to put BA on the cover to beat the other Tabs.

    Reply
  160. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @joanne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  161. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:44 pm

    @joanne:
    Yea, it’s not full of Fix a Flat :lol:

    Reply
  162. Violet said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    @joanne:
    Hehehe, true enough, Jolie is derriere-challenged. Actually, she has a pretty lousy figure: big boobs, thick waist, and skinny legs. And all those veins! Intersecting like telephone lines at the Pentagon. The only fat thing about her are her lips and her hair, which she has washed, styled and primped for her everyday. Life is so tough for a philanthropist! I wonder if she even knows how to write a cheque. Hmmm.

    Reply
  163. WCKitty said on April 14th, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    No matter where you go, Jen is being dragged into this engagement. This one is my favorite: :lol:
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=312735

    Personally, I believe they should get married. However, I wouldn’t put it pass them to just be using this as a publicity stunt. They probably need the money and press. Since the children are not allowed to Google either of them, how would they know that they are supposedly engaged? Jolie has a court case to deal with in the near future and “leg-gate” has yet to die down. Neither are working beyond the faxed press releases and they are running out of options.

    Reply
  164. Kate said on April 14th, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    @rushdog:

    I know there are some posters that question if IAN is right or wrong, but that perspective will lead to a blurred answer imo. The one thing he will never do regardless of how much we beg or plead for clues or a story , is write something up that will reveal who told him what. These riddles in hindsight give more insight than we when work them. If we go back and look at the last clue , (referencing Togi’s post) they were going to announce something in April He also knew they are tying to fool the pee cops, which imo is really the masses and the press, not about drugs, agree with you on that.
    If you follow his twitter it reflects what he is working on or interested in, or that is how it appears: Angelina Jolie (Brange, Courtney Love, and NHL) , and all of his tweets are in relation to those three things. There is one that has someone watching a NBA game, and it used 3 times with 3 different titles, so I have no idea what he is saying because I can not relate to sports or those titles, but that photo is a person in their birthday suit alone (as anoy mentioned) watching the game, just as this post is titled. It does not look like a woman to me, but a transgendered man, but what do I know?

    Patty mentioned that Ian questioned “engagement above”. I think there are a few clues here and there that are saying that it is not what it seems to be, which seems pretty obvious.

    The last post told us they were at war, so with who? Something is coming out, could it be a video , raw video , wonder if Brad was with a dude dressed like a lady , or both were. Who was it that said, “Brad and Angie have slept with a black chick, and insinuated at the same time” that was on air, no rumor, no made up tabloid, promo work, and TH, “it works because they have a open relationship” , so how long can that work before you get caught? If they can not keep her mouth shut, what are the chances they can control every person they have been on the downlow with?

    If in the end though IAN’S source is not going to allow him to break this in any other way than riddles, then I don’t see how it can come out, unless others have it and it gets leaked. I hope IAN breaks it though, whatever it is.

    Reply
  165. Kate said on April 14th, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    lol that is not true , ha you get it pretty well.

    Reply
  166. Kate said on April 14th, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    same here has something to do with that back end , eh?

    Reply
  167. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 2:29 pm

    Most definately and I don’t mean rear ended by a car. Wink.@Kate:

    Reply
  168. Brown Sugar said on April 14th, 2012 at 2:57 pm

    Oh Kate, you are a piece of work. You are just pathetic and an embarrassment to woman hood. Just shut the FUCK UP with your rationale of the SHEMALE Ian and his idiotic clues. The Jolie-Pitts put all of you to shame. Go shoot yourselves, all of you. BITCHES

    Reply
  169. Brown Sugar said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:10 pm

    Guest 2 you forgot that your precious Jen is also a drug addict as you put it. Remember who she used to lay around the house with smoking pot and getting stoned, nobody but her ex husband. At least he saw the light and left her fugly ass. Believe me, you will be singing another tune when Midget boy leaves that boring no talent witch. As a matter of fact how many men have left Chinnister since Brad dropped the UGLY coon. She went through 7 men in 7 years . I am sure this morning she is once again bawling at the ocean with little Mc Stumpie debating whether to let her drown herself in her own tears or to save her.

    Reply
  170. justforfun said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:13 pm

    The butt in that photo looks like it belongs to a woman. The arm that is holding the ball looks like it may be a mans but the fingers looks like a woman’s. lol. weird.

    Reply
  171. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:25 pm

    Speaking of crying…..Ange has a habit of crying in the shower, maybe that’s why Brad gave her the blood diamond (she likes blood) ;) I’ve wondered about the nannies…I’m sure they’ve got “the goods” on them, might even be who they are both sleeping with :shock: since they like to keep it ALL in the Family. ugh.

    Reply
  172. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:29 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Ick…her nails look dirty, like there’s poop under them :lol:

    Reply
  173. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:32 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    lol , you read my post? ;)

    Reply
  174. Brown Sugar said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:34 pm

    Down the Coast , Angie can cry all she wants in her shower ( at least she is not at the ocean) She has her MAN and her 6 fabulous children, so what not to cry for. She is just overwhelmed with joy , love and happiness that Mr Brad Pitt has bestowed upon her.

    Reply
  175. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    Ha, I bet Jen knew about this scenario before you did. Clue 1.the ring. ;)

    Reply
  176. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:37 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    Yes she thrilled, Angie hates being married, and being told what to do, ask me how I know. ;)

    Reply
  177. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:45 pm

    http://globalgrind.com/music/mike-tyson … -interview

    “Oh, he wasn’t Brad Pitt back then. He was just some little beach-bum-looking dude. “Hey dude” kind of guy. He was probably selling his body for money or something, I don’t know. He was very pretty.”

    Reply
  178. payal said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:47 pm

    http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1651509
    check out this thread people just do not care, eyes are rolling everywhere, they are honestly getting more and more desperate. either she attempted suicide if he didn’t propose if it isn’t a stunt they both came up with, or either it was all her and brad is still literally to baked to know what is going on. off the stunts they have pulled this is the weirdest and certainly one that no-one is really buying. if they did it a few years ago then maybe and what the hell is happening really?!? is it just a promise ring to see what will happen in the future, because that makes this whole thing even more pathetic.

    as for the ring u loons should not be proud, it looks hideous and is the color of piss. the one he had made for jen was truly spectacular and you could feel what it meant.

    Reply
  179. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:50 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkcXsCrRoUU&feature=related

    Paparrazi to Johnny Lee Miller, “Hey Johnny, is that YOUR BABY Angie is carrying?” While preggers with Shiloh. Video shows Angie and JLM lhaving MIllerPorn at an airport in NYC 2005

    Reply
  180. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    :lol: :lol: SURE she is! She’s got 6 nannies to take care of her kids….and somebody else takes care of her MAN’S needs too! :lol: What’s left for her to do??? :shock: (play with her poo) :lol:

    Reply
  181. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  182. KATE said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Doug says Angus was part of family from Day 1, that is clue 2, should we pull up all that Doug has had to say , especially from Day one…lol

    Reply
  183. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    Wow, someone is very upset over Angelina Jolie’s JAY LENO JAW aren’t they?

    Reply
  184. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:55 pm

    I think we’d need the Library of Congress to store all the dirt there is on Anal-Angie and BackPorchPitt….but I will do some research. Nothing is ever truly deleted from the Internet.@KATE:

    Reply
  185. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=8FMLH3OWImk&feature=endscreen

    Angie and some of her “relationships”….note the lip smacking with JLM early in to the video – that was taken at the airport early on in her pregnancy supposedly by Brad Pitt.

    Reply
  186. payal said on April 14th, 2012 at 4:09 pm

    @KATE:

    what clues u talking about kate? im unwell so i dont any mental capacity for anything today lol

    Reply
  187. WCKitty said on April 14th, 2012 at 4:11 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Oh, yuck!!! :lol: That ring sure doesn’t sparkle or do anything for her claws! The ring looks just like one of those in her boring barely-selling collection.

    Reply
  188. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 4:20 pm

    @WCKitty:
    That’s what I was thinking too, it probably is one of those rings. I can’t believe it took bonehead a year to come up with a rectangular design, but we all know he’s not the smartest bulb in the box (that’s why he’s stuck with the town whore). I can’t wait to see how happy the kids are now :)

    Reply
  189. WCKitty said on April 14th, 2012 at 4:50 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    The next photo-op after the kids are finished with their rehearsals? ;)

    Reply
  190. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 5:02 pm

    The Jolie/Pitts are just like the Kardashians. Trashy and untalented so they need to sell their lives to the highest bidder.

    Reply
  191. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 5:36 pm

    @joanne:
    It’s looking more and more like Idiocracy every day :(

    Reply
  192. Brown Sugar said on April 14th, 2012 at 5:47 pm

    You wish Joanne, you wish. they are “your” king and Queen. Go Brangelina.

    Reply
  193. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 5:50 pm

    They showed a photo of her hand wearing that tasteless CZ and the newscaster was asked about the ring but all he could say was, ” She will never be asked to be a hand model!!”….lol Claws maybe, hands no.@WCKitty:

    Reply
  194. iwasanon said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:08 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    You would think BS and the other loons would be off celebrating this engagement, if they really believe Brange is going to marry. Instead they are here posting crap about Aniston which leads me to think they don’t believe it either (or they are just Jolie’s paid minions).

    Reply
  195. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    Their not mine BS. I don’t worship evil.
    I feel sorry for you.

    Reply
  196. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol: more like vulture talons.

    Reply
  197. Brown Sugar said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    Laughing at all the Bitter Hens. Go comfort Manniston.

    Reply
  198. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:12 pm

    @iwasanon:
    I don’t think they know how to be happy. They should be gloating that the smelly old goat wants to marry their mediaho queen.

    Reply
  199. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    This bitter old hen is laughing at you.

    Reply
  200. iwasanon said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:30 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate: I don’t think anyone expects Ian to just write up the whole story but it would be nice to get a tip of the hat to someone who’s on the right track like he used to do. It’s been a long time since he’s done that.

    Kate & Rushdog: I do like Togi’s explanation “Fooling the bladder cops … Going to great lengths to appear clean and doing things naturally” however it sticks in the back of my head that I’ve never seen this used when it didn’t refer to drug tests. I have a hard time getting why Ian would use that terminology for fooling the press. It doesn’t make sense to me when he could have used a ton of other analogies for pulling the wool over someone’s eyes.

    Also, right now I am leaning toward this being PR. I think Patty Anne’s comment above about jewelry line might be enough of a reason for the PR. Unless there’s something bigger coming out like a settlement on the plagiarism lawsuit that she wants to overshadow that news.
    I’ve got to go back and look at the choke his partner clue and the tie in to this and think some more about the patch and ceasing smoking.

    Reply
  201. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    @Brown Sugar:

    The atmosphere gets so bad here when you make your comments. We know you read each and every comment and that is enough. It´s much better if you just lean backwards and keep on reading.

    Reply
  202. Tetta said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    @iwasanon:

    “Fooling the bladder cops..” It sounds too real to mean something else as this clue is about AJ and BP. Ian could use it about almost any other couple in Hollywood and meaning something else but not about these two persons. The whole thing with the engagement seems to be a
    non-story. Brad could give Angelina hundreds of rings and I would still not believe it to be an engagement ring.

    Reply
  203. Guest1 said on April 14th, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    I find it interesting that BP was on the cover of THR in late January, 2012, and THR broke the “engagement” story. I wonder if BP and AJ received compensation from THR?

    Bohomoth made the following comment in the comments section of their story on the engagement:

    “@canuck: “Getting divorced to be with someone else only guarantees that 7 years down the road, you have the same problems with half the bank account”.

    Yep word. I would LOVE to see the Jolie-Pitt pre-nup. Remember the news of the world got sued for saying they’d drawn up a pre-nup type document ? Well, at the time it turns out that Braddy Daddy was commissioning an engagement ring so… also, my sources say that AJ has NO money left that she “gave it all away to charity” (I’ll post on this Mon explaining more) so that explains the “year long design of the ring” basically, that’s how long their lawyers took to hammer out the pre-nup….”

    Reply
  204. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Where’s photoshop when you need it, eh?

    Reply
  205. Guest2 said on April 14th, 2012 at 7:24 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    You should be celebrating the good news surrounding your “family” and yet here you are still obsessing about jen. You really can’t let go of her, can you? Your obsession is truly sick and bizzare. Have you considered psychotherapy?

    Reply
  206. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 7:27 pm

    @joanne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  207. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 7:32 pm

    I guess they couldn’t disguise those “worms” crawling around under Morticia’s skin@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  208. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    Let me join in with you! This is wonderful news, and shows that the Toxic Duo is desperate indeed to come out with an engagement announcement after seven years and six kids only to say they are simply making a future promise and not setting a date. So what the heck was it all about then if not publicity and attention? Geesh, she should have put that ugly, dead stone they called a perfect diamond (not!, I know my diamonds) on her right toe so it could show off when her Right Leg goes out on the town.@joanne:

    Reply
  209. Guest2 said on April 14th, 2012 at 7:35 pm

    @iwasanon:
    BS referred to them as her family. Strange terminology for a fan. I think she/he is someone in jolie’s camp paid or used to trash aniston. That seems to be her/his only purpose both here and at ff. Same garbage repeated over and over. I think the jen obsession is jolie’s.

    Reply
  210. justforfun said on April 14th, 2012 at 8:10 pm

    What happened to Sugar Ray?

    Reply
  211. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    Hmmmmmm, well if this story is true, “Jolie has NO money, she gave it all away to charity”….i’d want to know two things. 1) Did she “give it all away” to HER charity where the moneys from the sales of the kids birth photos went? 2) Is it being hidden safely to prevent a huge payout for losing the plagiarism case to Mr. Braddock? 3) Was it a condition Brad required for him to remain with her for a longer time?@Guest1:

    Reply
  212. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Win Damages From Tabloid Claiming Split …www.usmagazine.com/…news/news/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-win-dam…Cached
    You +1′d this publicly. Undo
    Jul 22, 2010 – “The money will be donated to the Jolie-Pitt foundation,” an insider tells Us. … Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie accepted undisclosed damages from the News of the World at a … Invading their privacy,their childrens,dogs,cats etcc.. lives ar part of their … It is a shame they can’t sue the rag mags here in the US.
    ——————————————————————————————————————–

    This undisclosed court award from NOTW went as a “donation” into their Jolie-Pitt foundation. Uh huh, we have already figured out how that one works…cough, Chateau Miraval, cough. So, according to that blog Brad was already designing the engagement ring in July of 2010 ? Wow, nearly two years to build the ring.

    Reply
  213. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Al Gore invented the internet and Brad Pitt “designed” the rectangle :lol:

    Reply
  214. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol: I wonder how long it took him?

    Reply
  215. joanne said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:00 pm

    @Tetta:
    http://www.marijuanalibrary.org/bladder.html
    It helps with all drugs.

    Reply
  216. Up the Coast said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:16 pm

    @joanne:
    First, ya gotta get a pencil. Then, ya gotta sharpen it. ;)

    Reply
  217. rushdog said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:22 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Oh my gosh, I’ll be, that’s why he wasn’t with her on the Salt promotion tour he was too busy already designing the ring!!!!! He pulls his hand away from hers because he doesn’t want to damage her ring finger and ruin its beauty!!!! That’s why he’s been wearing the onsie – it’s his work clothes for jewelry design! Gosh he’s such the artist.

    He’s bi- at the least, it’s been a ‘have your cake and eat it too relationship’ and they were careless. He can’t end one relationship without having an option for the next. That’s his past. His set-up with JA was a blind date (or so it’s said) which sounds romantic. He conveniently connected w/AJ on a movie set with rumor and “romance” which worked brilliantly to sell a movie and set forth a life of media hysteria.

    Interestingly I was just reading some blinds and there’s one out there with GB and a young college woman and an actress which states GB asked her to have sex w/the actress who was JA. The more I read various things and consider the media exposure, the more I’m convinced that all three of the “triangle” are bi-. And I don’t care ii they are, but they clearly have to work very hard to keep it a secret.

    Reply
  218. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:39 pm

    hahahah ….oh that’s good.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  219. rushdog said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:41 pm

    Pitt has been one that let’s visuals do the talking. He wore the “garbage” or “trash” t-shirt on the beachwalk w/JA. He rode a bike in NOLA carrying a pic of Obama before the election in ‘08. This engagement announcement was planned. Her hand was such that the ring would certainly be seen in that photograph. The jeweler revealed enough information in the THR interview to suggest he had their blessing to do the talking. I think it’s rather interesting and humorous that the engagement announcement was made on Friday the 13th considered in superstion to be the unluckiest day of the year. That was no accident in an industry so aware of public perception.

    Reply
  220. Patty Anne said on April 14th, 2012 at 10:49 pm

    True, I seriously doubt Brad Pitt can make it if he’s alone. He seems to give his partners ( married or not) a shelf life of 5 years and considering he’s going on 7 with Angie, I’d say she was sly enough to recognize this and purchase insurance ( six kids). His mom and maternal grandmother were not happy at his separation from Jen, and in fact his grandmother gave the press a statement saying they would reunite. With that sort of pressure and the fact Brad and Jen were in marriage counselling Angie had to think fast and act on it even faster. She’s one sly ho, gotta hand her that. We know Angie admits to being Bi however I’ve suspected and read a few other articles where it’s been speculated that she is actually a lesbian , a dyke. Jenny Shimizu commented on that one time that I know of. Brad? I think Brad played a mind game with himself all these years, that he’s Bi when in fact he too is gay. We are what we are, but when we lie about it and profit from those lies it’s very wrong imo. I feel both Angie and Brad used the gay community when they issued that stupid story of not marrying until all gays can marry. Another dumb Bradspeak event. Yes, like Kate said here, they probably slipped up somehow and there is proof out there of what degree of depravity they indulge in and now they are in massive damage control. Too many bad things have happened to ruin their perfect world this past 12 months and they don’t understand how it could happen to them….plagiarism lausuit, failure on all fronts at every awards show, Angie’s Right Leg, and on and on. It’s going to be a very interesting year ahead and I am sooo looking forward to IAN’S *****Breaking Update on “engagement” coming soon***** YOU HEAR THAT BIG GUY?? WE’RE WAITING!!!
    @rushdog:

    Reply
  221. juliette said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:38 am

    @Patty Anne:
    I am really doubting Ian on all this, if he’s so in the know why didn’t we hear about it all on here first, no doubt someone will analyse some clue that pointed to this in a really non-sensical way. I think Ian is riding on the coat-tails of the whole Kobain thing & should stick to what he knows (although not read his book so no idea how true that is, does he have inside information?). He does not have that many twitter followers considering he’s meant to be at the cutting edge of revelations!!

    Reply
  222. juliette said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:41 am

    ps breaking news coming soon!!!
    translated to me means trying to think up some clever riddle that will make out I knew this all along

    Reply
  223. Lyin' Ian said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:52 am

    You guys get side swiped, again!

    Leave to y’all. Expect to happen, the exact opposite of what you are all pointing to. LOL.

    And Lyin’ Ian, not on the cusp of anything. Again, just shooting blanks in the dark and never hitting his targets. Oh, wait, he does. You guys, right between the eyes with his lies. Lies. Lies. And your sick twisted need to believe them.

    Don’t get it. But, My Name is Toast and PattyisanutterbutterAnne, KatebendoverandtakeitsomeMore, RushisreallyaDog. This is the best you can do?

    Tsk, tsk. Another month gone by and Brad and Angelina are still together, planning their future, which is more than you turtle heads seem able to do.

    And seriously, stop going to other sites. Keep the cray, cray here. Though, I hear the freaks at Fat Fucks had a serious melt down. I guess, sometimes, it can’t be contained.

    You hold tight. It’s going to be a bumpy ride. Yes, waste seven more years of your lives waiting for a couple to break up like it’s going to affect your lives, oh wait, it does affect your lives, look how much time you give to two people that don’t know you exist and never will. And try as you might to say differently. This went global and it went big. Two things Lyin’ Ian will never be, no matter how hard he tries.

    Oh and give him, seven or so days to read through your ramblings, so he can feed you a nonsensical nothing and you can clutch your pearls and go, see! See!

    Again, name ONE thing, just ONE, that Lyin’ Ian has said that has come to fruition. Just ONE. Can’t do it.

    Game. Set. Match.

    You nutter butters are sure entertaining.

    Discuss. LOL.

    Reply
  224. hahaha said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:24 am

    go brangie!!!
    ian you are a liar!!! stfu!

    Reply
  225. dayo said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:49 am

    Mangelina wears the pants in that family! Braddie wears the diapers!

    Reply
  226. Brown Sugar said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:28 am

    PattyCake you are a serious nut. Chinnifer is/ was never relevant to Brad and his Angie. Stop trying to justify Brad’s Hell to the No reunion with Ms Ticky Mc Stumpie. Go hold her hand so both of you an commit Mati Hari together. Nonesense.

    Reply
  227. mooki said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:36 am

    sounds like Will and Jada

    Reply
  228. anon2 said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:13 am

    I wouldn’t b surprised if Angie is pregnant. She’s skinny enough to pull it off like Mia Farrow who was 5 months pregnant filming “The Great Gasby” . Also, she was pregnant with the twins filming “the Changeling”.
    Insiders in the industry are saying they’ve been married since Angie added a Brad bithplace tat to her arm.

    Reply
  229. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:05 am

    It must be a loons day out. They are all here this morning. :lol:
    poor pathetic souls.

    Reply
  230. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:07 am

    I always thought the smelly goatman was to good for Aniston. Jolie and Pitt are a better match. I hope they marry and move to France and raise their little moneymakers happily ever after.

    Reply
  231. Guest2 said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:19 am

    @joanne:
    It’s really funny how they keep bringing aniston’s name into this over and over and then accuse her of riding their coattails. But I guess when the boss man gives you marching orders you do what you must to collect your paycheck. We’re all owned by our bosses to some degree, aren’t we? I’ll say one thing for the brand, they’ve trumped even themselves in the famewhore game. In that they are the reigning king and queen. The kardashians are novices by comparison. Mama kris should take notes in how to masterfully pimp out your own life.

    Reply
  232. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:32 am

    @juliette:
    It’s actually in the previous post (hotel/wine bar post) and yes obscure and clever. Togi guessed correctly right away that there was going to be some announcement in April (lazy swan golf – the golf club has a grand RE-OPENING in April, an expansion doubling the size of the club to make it more appealing to members). I’d been looking the other way on this for a long time because the public dynamics of this couple suggest to me that the relationship isn’t what it once was, far from it. And to be honest part of me was hoping that they would get some balls and not be held hostage to image. Maybe with this move that’s happened but only time will tell.

    But, had one of us guessed that his clues were going the other direction you’d probably be amazed w/Ian at this point. The clues are much easier to see in hindsight. It’s no skin off my back to be wrong about the guesses. I find it fascinating to watch the pr machinations the media “triangle” must do to remain relevant, all three of them. Their talent and capabilities are limited, imo, so manufactured publicity is what keeps them in the news, all three of them. That’s what PR is all about. Initially I didn’t put JA in that category but I do now. I would also expect that all three of them roll in and out of the sex and drugs atmosphere of the entertainment industry. The three of them are the same and his last two relationships mirror each other except the current took “all for show” to new heights. If you chose to admire that, well that’s your choice. I don’t.

    Reply
  233. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:32 am

    @mooki:
    Could be them too and quite a few others.

    Reply
  234. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 10:59 am

    @iwasanon:
    Putting some ideas out there:

    Patch = an incentive? a promise? a threat?

    After thinking about it I believe you’re correct about “fooling the bladder cops” being more literally what it says. So who would the “bladder cops” be: an entity with an interest in monitoring that situation – a studio/corporation, investors, insurance cos. – whoever has a financial interest in the actor’s success and who may have “supported” them previously. Maybe who may be affected by films not performing as hoped or expected, those who took a risk w/a financial investment (because really it all comes down to money).

    HW is full of drugs so how do actors get insured if they’re using? I suppose that depends on the actor. If you’re a benefit to a studio/corporation there are ways of getting around this to include an insurance company looking the other way or the actor becomes beholden to the studio/corporation for an opportunity to act, to maintain the successful level of their careers and avoid leakage of damaging information.

    I made slight modifications to what Togi said on April 5th, 2012 at 5:04 pm:
    Quilting machines … Sewing the pieces together
    lazy swan golf … Making its grand re-opening in April w/something new
    Fooling the bladder cops … Going to great lengths to appear clean and doing things naturally
    Easter bunny vs genghis khan… A battle (WHO IS THIS BETWEEN – WE ALWAYS ASSUME IT’S BETWEEN THEM)
    Recipes for leftover ham… Used after a holiday (Easter last Sunday) w/many options
    Abdominal thrusts… self-administered
    late night heimlich maneuver – very specific, last hour effort to prevent death

    “Both were advised to cease smoking and were given the patch to help kick their nic fits.”

    They were told by the “bladder cops” to cease behavior and were given an “incentive” to help kick their withdrawal/addiction objections? So self-administered (their own way) and brought out the ring to make it look like they’re clean (family oriented) and doing things naturally (we’ve talked about this all along).

    addiction – something you can’t stop easily

    From Wiki:
    nicotine – “substance acts as a stimulant …main factor responsible for dependence forming properties of tobacco smoking…(which is) considered the hardest addictions to break…pharmalogical and behavioral characteristics that determine tobacco addiction are similar to those determining addiction to heroin and cocaine.”

    Yes I think they threw us (definitely me!) for a loop but I’m not sure “they” is actually the couple and that this is exactly what both preferred to do. I don’t think Ian was thrown at all!! :)

    Reply
  235. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:10 am

    @rushdog:
    Jolie and Pitt look like they roll in and outof the sex and drug world and if Aniston does then whats her secret for looking healthy and happy? She needs to share it with the Jolie/Pitts. They look old and haggard and its not the kids, they have nannies for that.

    Reply
  236. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:14 am

    @rushdog:
    I’m probably going to get rammed by our friendly visitor’s for continuing with the clue, but just have to…

    Scratching the word “withdraw” and leaving it at addiction objections (nic fits). An objection to continuing something that can’t be stopped easily.

    They were told (advised) to continue their “addiction” and were threatened as an incentive to stop their objections. So they did it their own way with a “promise for the future” (lol) by bringing out the ring.

    And I would say “cease smoking” ties into the nicotine addictions being similar to those determining addiction to herion and cocaine.

    People are naive if they don’t realize this is the way the system works.

    Reply
  237. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:16 am

    @joanne:
    I would suggest that she’s not in that world as deep and I don’t think she’s sold out to the powers that be. She appears to have some restraint and lines she won’t cross. Her successor on the other hand…

    Reply
  238. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:30 am

    Well everyone forms their own opinion which is why it’s so great to have such a diverse group going through the clues as a whole. Some believe, some disbelieve but that’s what makes it fun and a good way to share thoughts that lead to other ideas. As for Ian having some inside information , that I do believe. He’s been in places where no one else can claim to have been such as camped outside Chateau Miraval with the paparrazi during the final weeks of Angie’s supposed twin pregnancy, as well as being part of a vast circle of entertainment related people. He has said that he respects the source’s request not to be identified which makes perfect sense if you would ever wish to use that source again in the future, so yes, I believe Ian knows much more than he can reveal without risking loss of a valuable sourse/friend as well as a News Of The World type lawsuit. When the time is right it will all be revealed by Ian or some other source so I can wait. It won’t change anything to be in the know a day ahead of the publication of facts that can’t be denied, but it’s like a good gossip group with the maid’s cousin where you find out things that give you a peek inside the inner workings of a faux relationship or a real one gone badly wrong. Gossip always has been entertaining throughout human history. Mean spirited people turn it into something else, and then it’s on them.

    But when you look at it as a fun time shared with like minded people having fun dissecting riddles and chatting about other interesting things, it’s entertainment and a relief from world events that are often too horrible to consider. Relax, enjoy and don’t let anyone work you up into a lather for their own brand of “entertainment”….. :-) @juliette:

    Reply
  239. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:36 am

    Addiction = the brand.

    Reply
  240. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:39 am

    Why thank you Donna/WTF/piesailinggirl/SASSY and what ever else you decide to call yourself today….very good post…at outing yourself and your mean spiritted self. @Lyin’ Ian:

    Reply
  241. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:40 am

    Hello mooki, good to see you again.@mooki:

    Reply
  242. liv4 said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:42 am

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    You have more personas than Firefox.

    Reply
  243. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:45 am

    LOL, yes, they are rather pathetic, but highly entertaining. It’s like watching the little car pull up at the circus and seeing all the clowns come tumbling out.@joanne:

    Reply
  244. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:51 am

    I am applauding you on this one rush, very good! Makes perfect sense. They failed to perform (succeed) to the expectations of their “owners” and therefore found it imperritive to reinvent their revelancy. Last ditch effort? Darn! Even this ring looks fake.@rushdog:

    Reply
  245. Dream said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    mata hari means eye of the dawn. very beautiful name. how is that done? just curious.

    Reply
  246. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:29 pm

    @Dream:
    I think silly little bs meant hari kari. You have to excuse loons, they try to sound so educated.

    Reply
  247. Dream said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    @rushdog:
    lol do what i do just pitty the poor souls and do what you want. none of us are swayed by their tantrums.
    you rush on the other hand we enjoy reading your posts.

    Reply
  248. Dream said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:38 pm

    @joanne:
    lol i have a feeling she has no idea how hari kari is committed. if two people go in to commit hari kari together only one dies. i have a feeling thats not what she meant.

    Reply
  249. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    @Dream:
    :lol: Please excuse me too.
    Whatever bs meant it wasn’t nice. S/He has a rotting heart to wish death on anyone.

    Reply
  250. Dream said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:48 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    well said.

    Reply
  251. Dream said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    @joanne:
    lol i didn’t mean to say u were wrong. i think thats what she was trying to say. but hari kari is not really suicide like many people think.
    its very interesting actually. one of my daughters teachers used to play it with her friends as children and she taught us the procedure. the person that dies is only required to make a small cut then the second kills them quickly.

    Reply
  252. Violet said on April 15th, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    What period of time does Ian consider “soon?!?!?”

    Reply
  253. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:01 pm

    @joanne:
    They must be serving free donuts, with the free wi-fi, at the Super 8 this morning :)

    Reply
  254. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    @liv4:
    She should try “mommie dearest” that would be a good fit.

    Reply
  255. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol: :lol: :lol: coming out butt first!

    Reply
  256. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    @joanne:
    :roll: good grief!

    Reply
  257. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Actually to clear about what I’m guessing, this may not have been their plan or choice, but they are tied by the moneyholders, the bladder cops who check the “test” results. There may have been a plan for an announcement in April (as Ian suggested last fall in the Maddona post about her new CD “release” in the spring) but the “last minute heimlich maneuver” to stop the choking or from being choked was to put a ring on it. Despite protests they were advised to continue the brand.

    Not sure what to think of “watch NBA basketball” maybe going or jumping through hoops. I do think the “in the raw” and “birthday suit” has to do with no clothes or exposure. And I tend to think this is both of them rather than one having an upper hand over the other, but could be wrong on that (or again on all of this!!).

    Reply
  258. rushdog said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:17 pm

    @Violet:
    That is anyone’s guess!! The last time it was quite a few days and he could have held it to post on the day the engagement was announced (another clue he knew something was going down). Ian’s definition of “soon” is clearly different from mine!

    Reply
  259. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:32 pm

    I don’t know what Ian’s clues mean….All I do know is, I’ve seen hundreds of thousands of people who have become engaged…and none of them look as BORED as these two do. There is nothing conventional about either one of them, so as far as I can tell, they are just playing this out for product placement (of this crappy jewelry line) or Ange has manipulated these kids to put pressure on Brad, to give her a ring :roll: Whatever it is, it doesn’t look REAL or from the heart…since neither one of them seem to have one of those.
    I don’t care what any of their lunatic fans say either…..I’m still waiting for the kids to tell their story :)

    Reply
  260. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:34 pm

    Perhaps to watch NBA basketball means to learn how to be a team player? Who has lost the most with their multiple failures over the last year? I know Angie put up a lot of cash to make her rape/war movie, and Brad had several failures with his Plan B….but there must be others with more invested in the continued success of the faux Brangelina union.@rushdog:

    Reply
  261. KATE said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    It has to be more than just that though , or IAN would not have used the photo above. I think think this was a huge story like the one last year and Ian obviously knew about the engagement. The last riddle has a clue that suggested something would be announced late on a Friday, but I think that wa Ian and his news. Pax is staring at himself in the glass lol, Brad looks like he is depressed, and Abhor is the only one that seems to be on cue although they all knew the camera was there. 10 year contract? Brad will be hitting 60, kids old enough , she will still be young enough? Are we sure they are not COS? Lol

    Reply
  262. Violet said on April 15th, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    @rushdog:
    Ian’s definition of “soon” is clearly different from mine!

    Me too! And am totally sick of that gleaming backside. Keep wanting to draw a face on it! Or maybe two faces. :-)

    By the way, has everyone seen the new closeup pic of the “engagement” ring? It’s ghasty. A delicate band would definitely have set off the centre diamond better, rather than the row of tiered Baguette stones. No doubt the centre stone is 6 carats, in honour of their six kids. Wouldn’t be surprised.

    Reply
  263. iwasanon said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:10 pm

    @liv4:
    LOL.

    Reply
  264. Dream said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    @KATE:
    i thought that too. sounds very like orders from cos. the clue i mean.

    Reply
  265. KATE said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    The Sun (isn’t that Bohomoths old stomping ground?) has as story up that they will live in the UK for next 2 years, she has 3 films back to back but they will marry in France. Poor Pax, wonder if this has anything to do with his birth mother?

    Reply
  266. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    @joanne:
    This should say i always thought Aniston was to good for the smelly goatman.
    Old age is creeping up on me. :lol:

    Reply
  267. KATE said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:22 pm

    @Violet:
    I wonder why she did not at least file and buff her nails.

    Reply
  268. Dream said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:23 pm

    @rushdog:
    maybe in the raw is like emperors new clothes. trying t make nothing into splender? making the masses see what is not there?

    Reply
  269. Evil Kitty said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    All I want to know is will the bride be wearing white? (white blood cells in a vial ofcourse). Will they force Shax to be the best man and say she asked to wear a tux? Will fashionista Vivienne design the dress? Will Maddox compose the wedding music? Last but not least, will James Haven be maid of honor? Enquiring minds want to know.

    Reply
  270. Violet said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    You are SO funny, Patty Anne. I love your posts!

    Reply
  271. Violet said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    HAhahhaha, this is great!

    Reply
  272. KATE said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I keep wondering about that too, I do not know much about sports , but watching it alone butt naked , that would make sense, maybe they are stripping them down until they join the team ? I have migraine lol so not clucking..

    Reply
  273. iwasanon said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:49 pm

    @rushdog:
    I think your posts today are in the right direction. Here’s what I’ve found

    I originally looked at Graham King as the controller getting them in line because he’s a producer on WWZ. But the release for WWZ is so far out (Jun 2013) that this PR move wouldn’t really make sense at this time.

    Then I looked at Killing Them Softly(KTS). According to 2 articles on mubi KTS is not a definite yet for Cannes. Mar 23 article had it at 93% probability, but an Apr 5 article had it as a 3rd tier contender as a “Who Knows, Maybe”. April 19 is the announcement of the 2012 Cannes lineup

    So your comment above makes a lot more sense.
    “They were told (advised) to continue their “addiction” and were threatened as an incentive to stop their objections. So they did it their own way with a “promise for the future” (lol) by bringing out the ring.”

    Producers & distributors for KTS want this film at Cannes. Cannes committee needed something more than the TOL show they put on last year so this “engagement” was announced now to get the Cannes committee to put them on the list.

    Side note: One of the producers on Killing Them Softly, Chockstone Pictures, provided seed money for TOL and is a producer on The Counselor. So it also makes sense they’re pushing for “The Brand” to have roles in The Counselor to be associated with the hot actor of the moment, Fassbender.

    Reply
  274. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:52 pm

    ;-) @Violet:

    Reply
  275. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:54 pm

    Strip them down in order to build them up to be what THEY wish them to be. Making them play by the rules and not by their own preferrences. Being controlled, no longer playing single but as members of a greater team.@KATE:

    Reply
  276. Lyin' Ian said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:57 pm

    I see, still can’t come up with that ONE thing that Lyin’ Ian has ever gotten right. LOL.

    Even though he’s on the cusp of the scene. Not.

    Carry on.

    Deflect.

    Reply
  277. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 2:59 pm

    This scenario fits perfectly and makes clear a lot of the dark issues surrounding Ian’s riddle. I think you have it there.@iwasanon:

    Reply
  278. KATE said on April 15th, 2012 at 3:10 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Which one do you think? Masse will never talk unless Brad leaves and he is closer to him, Pax, maybe, Zahara, never, the twins, too soon to say. Shiloh , probably if Angelina is correct and she is the most like her. Demise biggest mistake was bringing her girls back , she should have checked her vanity and stayed in her little town and just rented a dude. She would not be in this mess, nor the girls, or as badly. I think Brad and Abhor will forever be drunks because the kids have already set them on that path. It would be good for them to get married, stay in One place for 2 years, let the kids have some friends, ( oh the gossi..p) lol , maybe the family can have somewhat of a normal life except for their vices. Not holding my breath, mainly because she hates being married, and he will have no out for a decade. If they do , someone has something on them very damaging . Goldie and Kurt, Susan and Tim, many couples do not believe in marriage and raise their family without doing so. Gay, bi, a raw video, no other options for Brad, something. Brad began yakking about this though 6 months ago, so it does sound like the engagement was planned. Honestly? Who gets engaged with 6 children?lol If they want a private ceremony they could have done that, like most who value their privacy, and then announced the big news. “Engagement” give up the news Ian.

    Reply
  279. KATE said on April 15th, 2012 at 3:13 pm

    I really do not type in abhor for her name , but whatever fits. This thing has a mind of its own. Ha! How about that BS, even my toys do not like her.

    Reply
  280. liv4 said on April 15th, 2012 at 3:20 pm

    @KATE:
    LOL

    Reply
  281. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    LOL , and I thought it was very fitting.@liv4:

    Reply
  282. Guest1 said on April 15th, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    I copied this from FF, I hope the link works, pretty funny:

    This is so funny and Craig has his own theory about her leg bombs. It starts at 5:00.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKVfBAZEQ9w

    Reply
  283. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:13 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    I guess your filthy mouth and childish name calling and baiting did not do the trick so you think this will work? lol Ian does not need defending. It is amusing though watching you trying to understand what he is “really” saying. Please, carry on, by all means. Brad is laughing at you.

    Reply
  284. Lyin' Ian said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:16 pm

    Cricket? LOL.

    You keep waiting PattyisapsychoAnne for a clue from a man that sticks a woman’s ass in your face.

    Reply
  285. Lyin' Ian said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:18 pm

    What is there that Lyin’ Ian is “really” trying to say?

    He’s a loser that hasn’t got ONE thing correct. Here let me stick a woman’s butt in your faces. Yep, that’ll do the trick.

    Reply
  286. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:26 pm

    I rather have that well shaped butt in my face then that scrawny right leg of Jolies. :lol:

    Reply
  287. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:27 pm

    Is Lyin’ Ian jealous of the butt or upset it isn’t flat like his ragmag queen?

    Reply
  288. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:36 pm

    We all know you are a loser, so return to your motel room and take a nice hot shower to cry in.@Lyin’ Ian:

    Reply
  289. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:53 pm

    Shoes of Passion- Christian Louboutin -Angelina

    National Arts Club- Gramercy Park (members only) old NYC vibe, no prices on menu- possibly a reference to a sponsor, or an older man? a club?

    Let My People Go- Brange is in bondage, either literally by someone, inc, or each other, or sex play.

    Passover Delight-photo of women from the waist down- Ang is sleeping with women

    Passover in New York – ??

    Photo of a concert?

    NYC Rocks- Fireworks– fighting

    Kosher Easter Bunny- Topless tranny? blue feathers

    HH Fan Club- marathon runners-going on for a long time

    Letour des nordiques in Quebec- devoted fan?

    Nordiques masqot- tranny in blue skirt-Badaboum-? What happened to Badaboum, drug habit destroyed, someone helped get him clean, analogy?

    Ebony and Ivory- dark skinned tranny licking white foot (Brad & ??)

    Cup Hab- tranny with g string up butt (lot of naked butt pictures)

    The Scott Gomez Look- black strap shoe–?? S&M Mexican and Columbian descent , bondage?

    Markov in drag- tranny -??

    Habs new gym- naked tranny with blue feather (same one) -gym ?? deal or what?

    Hottest couple since Brad and Angie -Joe Franklin with someone on his lap (leave definition ?)

    Melo & knick biggest fan- naked butt watching NBA with full disclosure of yahoo that looks like it was built.(at least to me. male female ?

    Bon Voyage-plane leaving ?

    On the set of HH new film- ?? not sure what that is

    gym and coach- 2 tranny (blue one again) gym again, part of a deal?

    Carmelo naked- name of player in NBA, same photo of naked dark skinned man.woman yahoo disclosed on bed watching NBA ,alone.

    Ian with girls at airport-new angels??

    Photo of Ian with blue glass and shoes- not sure if this is related.

    HH Nation- same crown Marathon (same photo again) still going on

    HH Band- ??

    Ian with 2 girls again at AP ??

    More Nords fans in NYC than any other place- Brad, wow there are so many guys here, and they are so nice. lol, just guessing.

    I’ll only bang girls with blue skirts on-same photo earlier he used- now telling us someone will only bang trannies , my guess -Brad or both of them.

    Passover Greeting- Let MY People Go- Again–Bondage again

    Joe Franklin Story- he is eating a slice of pizza?? (same older guy with the girl(?) before.

    Q & A sandwich – half american half jewish ?? one of them is gay??–is the older man Jewish or is that relevant at all? One is gay?

    chick slept with 12 habs (tranny) photo of a girl (white) in black lingerie (no face)– there is a photo of Angie out there in black lingerie. (Jen too but I don’t think this involves her)

    next expose on Sirus- photo of Stern

    Numerous sports Habs and Norbs that could apply to the above but they are lost on me,then picks up with the following.

    HH Angels again- this times 2 trannies , but dressed in clothes. (are those his sources?) not them but representation of where he is getting this from?

    The square defies a tree not 2012- (the engagement) their life?

    Who do you like better, AJ, CL or Nords- a lesbian, a murderer, or a team, not sure how he sees them winning, losing?

    to be cont.

    Reply
  290. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    You just have not been listening. ;)

    Reply
  291. Violet said on April 15th, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    @KATE:
    Yes, I’ll bet she chews her nails. Have you noticed that the ring looks exactly like a pair of earrings SHE “designed” for her jewellery collection? It’s on her jewellery website. I swear, the design is identical. Baguette is definitely her thing. The fifty dollar knock-offs should be hitting the market by tomorrow, just like Princess Diana’s ring.

    Reply
  292. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    Not tonight King Lebron- number 6 -picture of him putting the ball in the hoop- 4/11

    Friday the 13th, best day to stay in and Fornicate.Enjoy all.

    Friday the 13th is your lucky day, I love u all

    To :Brangie-marriage is a three ring circus, engagement ring, wedding ring, and suffering. -willing to get married and suffer if they have to .

    Would you marry a hot 20 something without a penny or someone 95 plus with 50 million to leave to u- has to be a clue – $$$

    Did u know that five of every seven women under 25 in the US has slept with a man over 40– (earlier there was a one out of every 3 women have slept with another woman)

    so wondering is this in reference to Angie , sleeping with an old man, although she prefers women, Brad sleeps with who knows what. Or is the older man controlling them?

    I think Ian has gotten some info about where one or both have been slipping and sliding and it is or was going to be leaked . They are being forced to clean up , and are miserable.

    Reply
  293. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    @Violet:
    I believe the jeweler said it was from her collection so that makes sense. Brad probably designed it to be marketed .

    Reply
  294. payal said on April 15th, 2012 at 6:42 pm

    i saw another forum someone said they ring looks more like camilla parker bowles’s ring lol! makes sense

    Reply
  295. AmaryEllis said on April 15th, 2012 at 6:50 pm

    @iwasanon
    I think you hit the nail on the head. I originally thought this sham was for deflection – but now I think it is all about generating a place in the Cannes film festival lineup. The film industry has become all about who you know and how much publicity you can generate. I read an interview not long ago with John Cusack – he was lamenting that fact and said if he had to do it all over again he would have ‘played the game’ and been more successful -

    Reply
  296. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    On April 10, one day before she was seen wearing that ring, Ian said that a deal would be announced ..that was in regards to -

    Savaged convinces Patrick Roy to coach Habs. Deal to be announced after juniors playoffs http://pic.twitter.com/TcQcCVRp (that would have been after March 30)

    since he said this 4/10 and she did her photo op on 4/11 I think Ian knew the shotgun wedding was being made public.

    Reply
  297. Lyin' Ian said on April 15th, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    Kate, one thing that you can shout out loudly and proudly? Don’t hide behind the riddles.

    Zip, nil, nada, zilch.

    And Kate, Lyin’ Ian puts a woman’s backside in your face. Reeks of the respectable. Oh, wait, it doesn’t. Grab for that brass riddle.

    Same time next week? Month? Year? I get why you wouldn’t hold Lyin’ Ian accountable. You, like anyone else, doesn’t want to see the sight of him running through Times Square naked.

    But, he’d all but blow Angelina and Brad. Oh, please, don’t ignore me! I will not be ignored! Buy my book! Someone, buy my damn book! Hands and knees, no really, someone, anyone, pretty, pretty, pretty please, buy my book. He’s not too proud to beg on national TV. LOL.

    Reply
  298. Armitage said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:03 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate are you sure Ian’s twitter comments are really clues? Lol, I just thought that Angie’s geriatric boyfriend could be 95 year old Kirk Douglas – in 2007 he said his ambition for the year was to meet Jolie if his wife would let him! He’s still a dirty old git, so who knows. Eeew.

    Reply
  299. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    http://twitter.com/#!/IanUnderCover/status/189499362651549697/photo/1

    I know who this looks like, is it? If it is , hmmm.

    Reply
  300. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    @Armitage:
    yes

    Reply
  301. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:18 pm

    I wasn’t , but because of the content I asked, yes . He is breaking a big story. I don’t know about what , other than what we see there and here. Looks like they are being forced to marry though, clean up their mess, and apparently Ian knows what that mess is. lol how now Brown Sugar?

    Reply
  302. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:22 pm

    @Armitage:
    lol, could just be a reference to would you marry for love or money? we know what they are doing, and if you both gay or bi or sleep with an assortment of others, well then, what better arrangement can there be?

    Reply
  303. payal said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    @Kate:
    who?

    Reply
  304. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:31 pm

    @payal:
    I want someone to tell me. lol who do you think it is?

    Reply
  305. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:33 pm

    @Kate:
    oh wait , this is Ian’s question, hot sex or money. lol j/k ;)

    Reply
  306. Kate said on April 15th, 2012 at 7:39 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    You have absolutely no idea at all what is really going on, at all , zero. There is no point in discussing this with you.

    Reply
  307. payal said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:00 pm

    @Kate:

    kate what do you think jens reaction was about this “engagement”?

    Reply
  308. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:06 pm

    @KATE:
    If the shoe fits ;) (abhor) It is a “promise for the future”, so I’m not even sure…IS that an engagement? Or just a promise ring, like in high school? I think it’s just product placement.

    Reply
  309. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:15 pm

    @joanne:
    Hahaha…bingo!

    Reply
  310. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :shock: too much free time on her hands….with the free maid service ;) she’s livin’ the dream.

    Reply
  311. AmaryEllis said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:22 pm

    Where do you think this B & A thing is heading? How do you think it will end? The Brange circus is getting boring – but, neither one of them could have a partner that would bring them more attention – or could they? I think they played this all wrong from the beginning

    Reply
  312. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    Ian Halperin ‏ @IanUnderCover
    Not tonight king Lebron http://twitter.com/IanUnderCover/status/190637659155210240/photo/1

    @Kate:

    Reply
  313. Patty Anne said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:32 pm

    JAMES@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  314. guest 3 said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:44 pm

    Forced to get married? that sounds so ancient . For what? they’ve been together for 7 years and have 6 kids.
    Do you really think that getting married would make a difference with their already super successful career. No one cares anymore whether a couple is married or not. It’s not 1952..

    Reply
  315. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 8:45 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :shock: OH My Word! :lol:

    Reply
  316. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:15 pm

    @AmaryEllis:
    I think so too. They painted themselves right into a corner, and they are two of the most boring people on the planet now.

    Reply
  317. liv4 said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:16 pm

    @joanne:Oh for FS, pics of desirable butts are on Pinterest as motivation for exercise. I seriously doubt this is a pic that Lyin Ian is offended by, not with her language and vile comments.

    Reply
  318. Lyin' Ian said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    Kate? I’ll I’m hearing is crickets.

    All Lyin’ Ian is brought to the table is a big ole bowl of nothing, but, begging. Please, buy my book. Brad! Brad! I know the real Angelina. I’ll blow you all if you’ll just buy my book.

    Crickets, except for the voices in your head. LOL.

    Reply
  319. Lyin' Ian said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:24 pm

    So boring, that all you do is talk about them.

    I guess that means you’re boring too.

    Reply
  320. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:26 pm

    @liv4:
    :lol: I think lyin’ ian mentioned it because a few said they were tired of seeing it and thats all lyin’ ian had.
    I didn’t think it offended its sensibility.

    Reply
  321. janindisguise said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:32 pm

    Helleau!

    Well, here’s my 2 cents:

    So the couple was ordered to watch one basketball game per week. Give up the nics (New York Knicks?). Does this couple live in NY? Is it Jen and Justin? BTW, Jen’s rear end probably looks like that.

    Reply
  322. janindisguise said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:35 pm

    And also, why would it be such a big, earth-shattering deal for BP/AJ, or anyone else for that matter, to become “engaged”? Like yous guys have said many times, they have been cohabiting for 7 years, is it? They have 6 ‘churrens’. This is insane if they or their controllers think this is going to keep them hot in the headlines. “Frankly my dear, I don’t give a shiz”.

    Reply
  323. KATE said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:41 pm

    @guest 3:
    No of course not, we were referring to them being ordered to get married by those who control their image and would like to keep the skeletons in the closet, along with Brad.

    Reply
  324. joanne said on April 15th, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    @janindisguise:
    They tried to make them hot. EOnline had 3 or more stories on it. Aol said it caused a massive reaction, I checked the responses and it didn’t seem massive to me.
    :lol: they sucked the hot out of each other and their handlers need to retire them to the pasture to raise those kiddos.
    Out with the old and worn out and in with the new.

    Reply
  325. janindisguise said on April 15th, 2012 at 10:15 pm

    @joanne:
    Yep.

    Reply
  326. Guest2 said on April 15th, 2012 at 10:32 pm

    Lots of interesting comments here today. So Lyin Ian thinks Ian is a liar who doesn’t know anything, she’s called various posters nasty names and told us we’re all boring but she’s been here posting almost non-stop since 1:52 am. Girl really needs to get a life.

    Reply
  327. Up the Coast said on April 15th, 2012 at 11:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    That’s about it, in a nutshell :roll: As far as her getting a life tho…..I doubt it will happen, that ship has sailed :lol:

    Reply
  328. checkmate said on April 16th, 2012 at 1:34 am

    so hypocritical of you HAGS to paint Brad as Bi and/or HOMOSEXUAL now that he shed that NASTY CHIN. that hag MARRIED A HOMOSEXUAL AND YOU HAGS LOVED HIM THEN!!!

    Reply
  329. KATE said on April 16th, 2012 at 1:42 am

    @checkmate:
    I still like Brad, but it what is, facts are facts, and two people they know both said on the air what of relationship they have, open, and threesomes, and one went as far as to say ebony and ivory..so no point in getting emotional.

    Reply
  330. KATE said on April 16th, 2012 at 1:47 am

    @payal:
    No surprise would be my guess

    Reply
  331. checkmate said on April 16th, 2012 at 1:54 am

    PROVE that they said it “on air” ,not some British tabloid on par with IN Touch Weekly. a certain FREAK is publishing it’s own FANTASIES through this NASTY BLOG.

    Reply
  332. liv4 said on April 16th, 2012 at 3:38 am

    @Kate:
    Just a question: Aren’t the Nords a defunct team who are now the Colorado Avengers? A few twitter references to bringing them back. I thought Nords were defunct due to financial difficulties. And references to Courtney being involved in Kurt’s death. So who do you like better? AJ? A defunct hockey team with financial difficulties? Kourtney? Do we have someone in financial difficulties who should be in jail? And a lot of references to a new coach.

    Reply
  333. Peri said on April 16th, 2012 at 5:12 am

    Couple things on Brad and Angelina “engagement”.

    1) Brad’s publicist didn’t say they were engaged, her exact words were, “It is a promise for the future and their kids are very happy.” That doesn’t sound like a “real” engagement to me, but rather just something to hold the kids off because Daddy gave Mommy a ring.

    2) If Brad worked with the jeweler for the past year, designing this ring, obviously Angelina had to be involved as well, for finger measurements, fittings, etc (and of course, her controlling input… did you notice that the emerald cut diamonds have a black “tinge” to them when the light hits them? Even the side diamonds. It’s kind of eerie… very smoky looking, which of course I’m sure surprises no one here)). So. Why then, did they both, over the past year, keep denying engagement or marriage plans? If all along, they were working on this custom-designed ring?

    3) Brad wanted it to be special for her. ~rme~ Just like the one he designed HIMSELF for Jen; to represent a heart and eternal love. She loses a baby, and he cheats on her while she’s grieving, has an affair, flaunts it and lets the bitch spread rumors that Jen wouldn’t have children while she buys hers and “makes” him a family including becoming pregnant with Shiloh two months before Brad and Jen’s divorce was final. I wonder how long his “forever love” for the bitch will last? Considering the meanings behind his rings don’t seem to mean much?

    4) I used to hope Jen and Brad would get back together… but no longer. I can’t stand him. He has no balls. Justin, on the other hand, respects Jen’s privacy, doesn’t give out details, and he is always with her. And OH MY GOD the man is sexy as hell. (Have you guys seen those photos of him mostly-naked in bed? ABs to die for… soooo sexy.) And Jen herself has stated he’s a protector, so she feels safe with him. I honestly believe that for the first time since Brad hurt her, she’s found someone who treats her right, respects her and loves her.

    5) I think because of Jen and Justin’s relationship, Angelina knew that sometime soon either they’d get married or Jen would become pregnant, or both, and she has set this all up to upstage Jen. Because if Jen gets pregnant now, or announces an engagement, all the tabs will say Jen is doing it to beat Angelina to the alter, or giving Justin the baby she couldn’t give Brad, blah blah blah.

    I just think Brad and Angelina suck. They cheat on each other. They fight like crazy. You can see it in Brad’s eyes he’s not a happy man, and quite honestly, he’s not looking too healthy at all (drugs or not). Angelina has has that crazed look behind her eyes, no matter how well she’s made up, no matter how well she dresses (padding included) and that whole leg thing she did with that forced pose? Just shows how damned desperate is she is for attention.

    I hope Jen doesn’t let them and their “fake” engagement hinder her plans with Justin. Be damned with tabs and do what makes you happy, Jen!

    Reply
  334. Patty Anne said on April 16th, 2012 at 10:04 am

    http://bossip.com/357331/say-it-aint-so-carmelo-anthony-has-a-secret-love-child-in-nyc12006/

    ” My Sources say that the child is 11 months old and that when his then girlfriend (now wife) LaLa Vazquez found out about the pregnancy she gave him the ultimatum of marriage or a very messy break up. My source goes on to say…”People don’t even know the half of it. Just because her life is in the limelight, LaLa thinks Carmelo wouldn’t do anything to ruin there image in the public eye…which is not the case. I know for a FACT, he’s not faithful”@Kate:

    Reply
  335. Child Of Medusa said on April 16th, 2012 at 10:11 am

    @Guest2:

    LOL the big “William and Kate” style engagement announcement is A MASSIVE PR rescue operation. It all stems from her recent “odd” behaviour and this includes the prosthetic leg episode.

    You know – most people I know seem to be unimpressed and bored – and to be honest, sort of stunned Joile and Pitt are still pushing the “happy ever after” Jolie show. They only seen to be fooling themselves these days – their relationship has became so transparent to the public – its pathetic, to say the least.

    Jolie and Pitt are desperate to keep at the top of Hollywood glamour couples – but with more talented, more beautiful, more younger actors snapping at their heels – its not going to last long – they know that, and are fighting to keep it. They are both so narcissistic that once the bubble bursts – they will split.

    Interesting that for seven years they have tried to remain all cloak and dagger and mysterious about their lives – so this “confirmed” engagment looks like nothing more than a scream for attention.

    The situation has become so absurd – the pair of them should be pitied lol

    Reply
  336. rushdog said on April 16th, 2012 at 10:22 am

    @liv4:
    Funny I just cringed when Kate said “yes” the twitter was a part of this. Like the blog posts weren’t enough to try and figure out!!! I’ve looked at it a few times yesterday but didn’t (and still don’t) have much energy to apply in deciphering those tweets (oh by the way, some of those are really “nice” photos Ian), but did notice that tweet and thought is was the most obvious to apply (and then I went to sleep!). And if so something is pointing to her in that tweet. Either choices causing a situation or battle victory I would guess.

    I’ve read Love and Death, Ian’s book with Max Wallace, and it’s a very interesting and eye-opening read. And they are fair and responsible in this book. There are irregularities in Cobain’s death investigation. For one thing the crime scene photographs were never developed (at least at the time of the book publication, not sure if they ever were but they may have been lost? can’t remember exacly) He was written off as a junkie. And the book suggests that CL’s fingers were all over that. (Reopen the case!!)

    So I think you’ve got something there: she is responsible for his “death” as we knew him (figurative) as Ian believes CL is responsible for KB’S death (literal). And maybe the defunct team (Nords) is brought back to life new (Avengers) – not sure on the latter as I’ve not read anything about this team. So who is the defunct Nords team that Ian is tweeting ‘bring back to life’ or ‘bring back to Canada’? The blond previous or the pre-engagement brange.

    I hesitate to guess that this stuff represents her vs him all the time. I’ve always thought that puts too much of the responsibility on her alone. But this tweet, if to be included, seems to point in that direction.

    From Websters:
    avenge – to get revenge for an injury or take vengeance on behalf of
    vengeance – the return of an injury for an injury, as in retribution, revenge
    nordic – a caucasoid physical type exemplified by the tall, blond Scandinavians (nordiques?)

    Reply
  337. Patty Anne said on April 16th, 2012 at 10:28 am

    based on all the “Carmelo” clues on Twitter as well. But then you knew that…lol@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  338. rushdog said on April 16th, 2012 at 10:38 am

    @Patty Anne:
    ?@rushdog:

    Thanks for that post. Should we go with battle victory? Eleven months ago we were in the throes of frozen embryos and ‘mama aniston…just because I haven’t told you doesn’t mean…’ posts. And it still does’t mean there is a little bundle but if someone found out that possibility was even “under discussion” I would think that would explain avenge.

    I always thought it was odd that in July Jolie was off the charts trotting the children around in London. And then JA/JT with a highly visable relationship. At made me think it was all deflection but what?

    Reply
  339. joanne said on April 16th, 2012 at 10:57 am

    @Child Of Medusa:
    It is kind of pathetic.

    Reply
  340. Patty Anne said on April 16th, 2012 at 11:21 am

    I too keep going back to Ian’s post, “Just because I haven’t told you ……..” and the intensified PR moves on the J-P’s part indicated something BIG and something SECRET had gone down and Angie was desperate to keep the attention on herself. As always the kids are pulled out of storrage and trotted all over for the photographers she brings along ( no one will make money off her kids but she herself)….. the clues on Twitter kept going to this Carmelo person whom I thought was a Tranny as were so many of the clues there, so I have to consider two different directions here. Brad is a tranny? Highly possible with all the photos of him wearing women’s clothing taken professionally as well as privately over the years….or….a love child. Brad’s love child? and this engagement is deflection? Jen’s love child? and someone is hiding it? So many possibilities, but Ian did promise us “……..Breaking Update on the “engagement” story…….” and I’m waiting for him to deliver. @rushdog:

    Reply
  341. rushdog said on April 16th, 2012 at 11:23 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Photo thought:
    Whoever this “ass” represents is the one holding the ball. The Carmelo post…

    Reply
  342. KATE said on April 16th, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    @checkmate:
    It is on You Tube, both interviews, two different stars, friends and they were each doing their own promo work. Now calm down . I do not have to prove anything. Stay in denial.

    Reply
  343. KATE said on April 16th, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    @liv4:
    see I was too tired too even get that far, very good

    Reply
  344. KATE said on April 16th, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    Yes I agree, terrible thing to tease the kids with though, and if the get married their star we ill plummet right to the bottom of the sea.

    Reply
  345. 3 red lights error said on April 21st, 2012 at 11:53 pm

    Thank you for the good writeup. It if truth be told was a amusement account it. Glance complex to more delivered agreeable from you! By the way, how could we communicate?

    Reply
  346. โรงเรียน ศิษย์วัฒนา said on April 22nd, 2012 at 7:47 am

    I do not even know the way I finished up right here, however I assumed this post was once good. I don’t realize who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if you happen to aren’t already. Cheers!

    Reply
  347. Thanks for your post said on May 1st, 2012 at 12:34 am

    Remarkable things here. I am very glad to look your post. Thanks a lot and I am having a look ahead to touch you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

    Reply
  348. How Much Is My Tag Heuer Watch Worth said on May 1st, 2012 at 3:33 pm

    Tag Monaco Sixty Nine

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Meta