IUC World Exclusive: The Messenger Rang Out Again…

Posted on December 5th, 2011 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Emaciated thinspo…going from black to red…yelling at the moon…yellingatmoonwhisky for the holy ghost…deprivation amblyopia…sauntering with thoreau…how much can can be garnished…slippery butta side gloves!!!!!

  1. Bob said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:23 pm

    You’re back! Yes!

    Reply
  2. Guest2 said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:29 pm

    HRH, thank you so much!

    Reply
  3. siska said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    good one IUC!!

    just in…jen dad comment that JTx is a charming man,,and they made a great couple and they get together when they can,,,
    He got seal of approval..from dad..so he must be not that bad..

    Reply
  4. siska said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    are this riddle including Jtx?..cause therou word is mention,,mm

    Reply
  5. siska said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    back again soon

    Reply
  6. Bob said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:38 pm

    Interesting that the longboard gloves are for sale on a website called oscarseek.com

    Reply
  7. Bob said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    Whose kid has a lazy eye?

    Reply
  8. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    @Bob:
    Knox?

    Reply
  9. sinker said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    THANKS IAN!!!!!!

    “going from black to red” – maybe financially? in the black – making money; in the red – losing money?

    (and if whisky for the holy ghost is a mark lanegan reference, i am saying WOW!! one of my all time faves, but oh what a trouble man…)

    Reply
  10. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 4:59 pm

    ty Ian for the new clue :)

    thinspo – From Urban Dictionary: Abbreviation for “thinsporation,” aka pictures of bone-thin women that girls with ana/mia use to remind themselves of their goals to become thin.

    ITA Sinker, going from black to red would indicate losing money, financial problems.

    Reply
  11. sinker said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:05 pm

    emaciated thinspo – AJ is starving herself again. Thinking the overall theme (thoreau, lazy eye reference, longboard gloves,etc) is that someone has refused to see clearly, not living in reality, and that is about to end and end hard.

    Reply
  12. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    Many thanks Big Guy. You always come through. 8-)

    Reply
  13. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:09 pm

    @Bob:
    joLIE has a lazy eye!

    Reply
  14. Stella said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    ╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱
    ╱╱┏╮╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱
    ╱╱┃┃╱╱╱┳╱┓┳╭┫┳┓╱
    ▉━╯┗━╮╱┃╱┃┣┻╮┣╱╱
    ▉┈┈┈┈┃╱┻┛┛┻╱┻┻┛╱
    ▉╮┈┈┈┃╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱
    ╱╰━━━╯╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱

    Love you!!

    Reply
  15. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    Thanks Ian. What are your thoughts about Braddock’s lawsuit???

    Reply
  16. Guest1 said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    I noticed there are two women and two men in the picture.

    Has anyone seen the following regarding the lawsuit?

    http://206.18.146.25/rfcViewFile/11cv8597.pdf

    Reply
  17. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    joLIE is starving herself…Brad is walking…last time he tried to leave, there was irrepairable damage, Ange’s eye is messed up…She’s going to make Brad PAY…financially and every other way. joLIE is crazy as a loon :)

    Reply
  18. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    Jolie is anorexic which is clear from recent photos. “Yelling At The Moon” – Buzz Aldren former astronaut is well known for doing this. He yelled at the moon, ” I walked on your face!, I Own you”. Jolie to Pitt?

    Reply
  19. whatever said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:27 pm

    Emaciated thinspo: Jolie is anorexic, no big news there.

    going from black to red: Financial problems……

    yelling at the moon: “I see you! I see what your doing! You have no business here! (Buzz Aldrin)

    yellingatmoonwhisky for the holy ghost: Brad turning his back on the religion he was brought up in…

    deprivation amblyopia…a suppression of central vision in one eye due to faulty image formation; for example, by a corneal scar, a cataract, or a droopy eyelid. (Trying to explain why Jolie always wears sunglasses?)

    sauntering with thoreau: Pitt see Jennifer out and about with Theroux, in NY?

    how much can can be garnished: A garnishment is a means of collecting a monetary judgment against a defendant by ordering a third party (the garnishee) to pay money, otherwise owed to the defendant, directly to the plaintiff. Hmm, wonder how much Jolie/Pitt could lose if Braddock wins his case?

    slippery butta side gloves!!!!!: They hide their monies in Fraudations, so that nothing can be touched…

    Reply
  20. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:27 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Hahaha I didn’t look at it that way. She probably sat on his face tho. :shock:

    Reply
  21. whatever said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    BTW, I see Holie has been out and about in NY with Holly attached at her hip, where is Brad Pitt at?

    Reply
  22. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    http://www.aafp.org/afp/2001/0815/p623.html
    Medical description of “deprivation amblyopia” My guess is that it is Knox who is affected with this.

    Reply
  23. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:30 pm

    @whatever:
    He must be with the kids…since joLIE is “working”. Or he’s packing his bags….

    Reply
  24. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    It does seem The End Is Near. Lots to deal with: Vision problems, loss of moneys/fame/success, anorexia combined with Vodka to excess…oh yes, the end is indeed near.

    Reply
  25. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    I was surprised at the photos of Jane Pitt holding tightly to Angie’s skinny arm as one would an invalid. Hmmmm@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  26. rushdog said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    Thank you, thank you Ian!! I’ve been over at FF because I needed to have something new.
    The Pitts are in NYC to help with the redirect and support their son in his effort to get out. AJ has a wonk eye in some of the photographs.

    The lawsuit – a very interesting read. I would also be interested in your thoughts, Ian.

    PLEASE CLARIFY – the tag. Only about the end of them as a couple or does it reference something in a larger sense?

    Reply
  27. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:36 pm

    Good job whatever. I think this one is clear. It’s nearly over with, or will be shortly. What a tangled web they must unravel now and not just the trust, the estates, the business’ but the kids as well. Must be why Holly Goline is glued to Angie’s hip again and not home with her hubby and three little children.@whatever:

    Reply
  28. Stella said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:37 pm

    This is in from NYC folks:

    Apparently James Braddock is going to be interviewed with his lawyer by Fox news THIS WEEK with substantial proof that includes videotaping!!

    Ian any truth to this ???? ;)

    Reply
  29. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    @Guest1:

    There is a thread over at FF about the following passages of the legal document. This indicates that Sarkic of Scout Film, was aware of Braddock’s work and they even discussed a potential film. This along with the Make it Right Foundation being emailed by Braddock concerning housing for the poor indicates there is a connection to Jolie. IMO, This does not seem to be an issue where two artists independantly came up with a similar story line and I use the term artist lightly when speaking of Jolie.

    From the document Guest 1 linked:

    23. At all relevant times, Defendants had access to the Subject Work through
    Defendant Sarkic, Defendant Scout Film, and various other motion picture resources.
    24. After Plaintiff released the Subject Work in or about December 2007, Plaintiff
    travelled to Sarajevo to promote the Subject Work and create awareness for Bosnian war
    victims’ organizations.
    25. On one of these occasions, Plaintiff was approached by Defendant Sarkic, who
    was an executive motion picture producer in the Bosnian region with Defendant Scout Film.
    Defendant Sarkic shared with Plaintiff that he read the Subject Work and expressed sincere
    interest to meet with Plaintiff on future occasions to discuss the Subject Work in further detail.
    26. From March 2008 through November 2008, Plaintiff and Defendant Sarkic met at
    least three times to discuss details of the Subject Work, including plot and character development
    and the story’s cultural significance and historical accuracy.
    27. These conversations evolved into pursuing the possibility of creating a motion
    picture from the Subject Work, which Defendant Sarkic would produce through Defendant Scout
    Film.
    28. Subsequent to these meetings, through 2008 and 2009, Plaintiff and Defendant
    Sarkic communicated extensively over the telephone and through text messages in attempts to
    continue the conversation about potentially creating a motion picture of the Subject Work.
    29. In or about August 2009, Plaintiff emailed LaToya King at Defendant Jolie’s
    organization, Make It Right, and proposed a collaboration for “Bridge of Love” whereby by
    Defendant Jolie would partner with Plaintiff to build villages of houses across desolated cities,
    including Sarajevo and New Orleans, linking the continents, cities, and people of different racial
    and cultural backgrounds. Plaintiff sent this email without knowing of any partnership or
    Case: 1:11-cv-08597 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/02/11 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:5
    communications between Defendant Sarkic and Defendant Jolie.
    30.

    How much can be garnished. Going from Black to Red, haha. Jolie’s wonk eye not being able to see this in advance. :lol:

    Reply
  30. whatever said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:44 pm

    @Stella:

    Stella where did you read that??

    Reply
  31. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:45 pm

    @Stella:
    I don’t usually watch Fox news….but I WILL this week!

    Reply
  32. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    @Stella:
    @Up the Coast:

    Kudos to Fox if true. I didn’t think they would go there since JV is a sometime guest due to his conservative political views. So, if they are interviewing Braddock, they are being fair.

    Reply
  33. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:57 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    I know what you mean, but …she is a bitch to JV :( I find it funny that she doesn’t want to bring up the past, with her father, but she thinks it’s okay to bring up the past of the Bosnian people, and shine a big light on that. Whatever suits HER needs…that’s how she adjusts her illogical logic.

    Reply
  34. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:57 pm

    @Evil Kitty:

    This is the thread over at FF I was referring to if you are interested. Not trying to derail to another site now that we finally got a new clue at IUC :) but just to give credit where it’s due for pointing this out. G2, I think you suggested something last night about one of the Bosnian film collaborators being behind the story or something like that so it looks like you may be right. ;)

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=305476

    Reply
  35. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    @Up the Coast:
    There is also a thread posted that states that AJ will play Dr. Kay Scarpetta in an upcoming Lifetime movie based on the newly released (tomorrow) novel ‘Red Mist’. Fox owns the filming rights to the Scarpetta novels. So how biased will Fox news be in this interview if AJ is playing Scarpetta. I guess this may be the last Scarpetta book I read. :(

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=305486

    Reply
  36. Guest2 said on December 5th, 2011 at 5:59 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I thought angie and jane looked kind of chummy in that photo. Jane is smiling big and so is jolie. I have a feeling the end is near doesn’t refer to the brand. But what do I know. I never guess right on these clues.

    Reply
  37. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:00 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    I think JV knows even more than us that she is a first class mental case, but what’s he gonna do? He has to play nice to her now so he can get the occasional visitation with his own grand kids which otherwise she would probably deny. :(

    Reply
  38. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    Exactly. :(

    Reply
  39. Guest2 said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:05 pm

    Interesting information about braddock and the Fox interview. If angie is implicated in the plagiarism then brad is also since his company was involved in the making of the movie. Maybe this is why the Pitts have been brought in. I don’t know, just thinking out loud.

    Reply
  40. joanne said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:08 pm

    @WCKitty:
    No more Scarpetta books for me, now allI will see is a bag of bones. Fox news likes Jolie as far as I can tell, if they have Braddock on it will be the first time i watch it willingly.

    Reply
  41. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:12 pm

    @Guest2:
    Ange must be in 7th Heaven…she’s the center of attention, and everyone around her is probably a nervous wreck…since she feeds off the adrenaline rush, she must feel like it’s Christmas ;) She might actually be high on life right now.

    Reply
  42. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:14 pm

    @WCKitty:

    That movie will be on Lifetime? hahaha :lol: Oh my, what are the loons gonna say about their idol doing a TV film when they bashed JA for that. As for Fox, I hope they will be fair and just the fact that this has made mainstream news does not look good for her. Is Scarpetta the character that performs autosies or am I thinking of something else? Does it matter if the actress playing the lead, looks like a corpse?

    Reply
  43. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:16 pm

    @joanne:
    Exactly!!! I’d never be able to get that veiny, smug look, and rickety old bones look out of my mind. It’s a race between my place on the library’s hold list and the movie. Then again one can hope that PC changes her mind and finds a more suitable person to play Scarpetta. :)

    Reply
  44. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:20 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    Hahaha, Scarpetta does perform autopsies. It may matter if the corpse looks in better shape than the person performing the autopsy!!! :lol:

    Reply
  45. rushdog said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    I think the Lifetime reference is to another Patricia Cornwall novel/movie, not the one AJ is connected to. The comment seems to be referencing something recent from PC.

    I’ve been done with Scarpetta books for a long time. Used to read them all but the last one I read (which I believe was titled “Scarpetta”) just didn’t hit with me. I read three of the books in a row one summer. Had to quit for a while!

    Reply
  46. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:57 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Picking over a dead body will be right up her alley.

    Reply
  47. Kirst said on December 5th, 2011 at 6:58 pm

    Whisky for the Holy Ghost – Album by Mark Lanegan, Wikipedia says that he comes from a dysfunctional family and has had substance abuse problems.
    deprivation amblyopia – Someone cannot see or is being deprived of details/information

    Reply
  48. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol: Didn’t she just claim to have studied to be a mortician online? :roll:

    Reply
  49. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:09 pm

    @rushdog:

    ty for the correction Rushdog. Sorry to have givin any lurking loons a heart attack mistakenly suggesting Jolie would be doing TV :lol:

    Reply
  50. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:10 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Yes, she did. She’s such a Renaissance Woman :lol:

    Reply
  51. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:11 pm

    @WCKitty:

    I think she said it was a mail order morticians course, tee hee. :lol:

    Reply
  52. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    Mail order??? Egads!

    Reply
  53. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:21 pm

    No worry. We all guess and none of us knows with certainty, but that is half the fun of it. With so much fodder given us by Angie the possibilities are endless. The Game’s Afoot Watson….wink!!@Guest2:

    Reply
  54. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:23 pm

    Does that mean she’s qualified to bury people in ….envelopes?@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  55. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    hahaha :lol: You be funny Patty Anne.

    Reply
  56. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:30 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: hahahahaha :lol: :lol: Good One!!!

    Reply
  57. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:43 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    I believe you are right! :)

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  58. Dream said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    o gosh that made me laugh.

    Reply
  59. rushdog said on December 5th, 2011 at 7:52 pm

    @whatever:
    @Kirst:
    Maybe this is about the end of all of it. Could this actually be about her getting caught, it gives him leverage and the trio ends?

    Emaciated thinspo – AJ – could this mean anything else? (starts off the clue)
    going from black to red – can refer to hair coloring or financial problems/maybe simply means going from the top to the bottom
    yelling at the moon – “I see you” – caught
    whiskey for the holy ghost – dysfuntional family/substance abuse problems
    deprivation amblyopia – faulty image formation
    sauntering w/thoreau – Henry D. Thoreau wrote about walking – a writer
    how much can be garnished – collecting in a judgement
    slippery butta side gloves – allow you to leverage your wheels for a greater degree of control

    Also taking this phrase apart
    whiskey = water of life
    holy ghost = holy trinity = trio

    The lawsuit filed might give him the leverage he needs to “change hair color” (from black to red to lighter, lol) from the emaciated thinspo to the one sauntering with thoreau. The messenger rang out again like the trumpet in February?

    OK I’m rambling but this must tie into the lawsuit and what will be revealed as a result. The media cannot ignore that filing. Read it if you haven’t.

    Reply
  60. joanne said on December 5th, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol:

    Reply
  61. whatever said on December 5th, 2011 at 8:32 pm

    The media cannot ignore that filing. Read it if you haven’t.

    Oh the media is catching up on it. However, People magazine still won’t print anything about it. They can’t. They have a contract with Brangelina, they paid millions upon millions of dollars to them (via kids pics), for their exclusives…and in return, People agreed to write ONLY positive press about them.

    Some questions regarding Jolie’s premiere tonight.

    Why is her premiere for her movie now, when the movie isn’t being released until December 23rd?
    Will Pitt even show up?
    Will Jane and Bill PuPITT be her escorts tonight?
    Will she allow the critic’s to write their reviews, or will they be sworn to secrecy until the opening weekend?
    Will Justin and Jennifer, by accident, walk by the red carpet (wouldn’t that be a hoot?)

    Reply
  62. whatever said on December 5th, 2011 at 8:35 pm

    Tags: The end is near.

    I hope not. Evil needs to be contained. As long as they are together, others are safe. I don’t want either of them out there, destroying other people.

    Reply
  63. joanne said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:00 pm

    @whatever:
    I am hoping it means the end of the media worshipping her. Its embarrassing.

    Reply
  64. joanna said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:07 pm

    http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/134991794.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF87892155F29F61288AC1CAC7A9365E49845611D4648DE16DB17ACCCA854C082133EA

    The Dragon is out looks the same as moneyball prem….

    Reply
  65. joanna said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:08 pm

    sorry guys its not showing on here , dont know what i have done wrong ?

    Reply
  66. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    @joanna:
    She looks so much older than 36 years.

    Reply
  67. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:29 pm

    Yes she does and with the millions of dollars she’s spent in plastic surgeries it makes me wonder what is she truly like in appearance if she’d remained that cute young hawt thing in Hackers? She’s chiseled, sculpted, erased, and reconstructed so much of the real Angie Voight that this person is a stranger. When children James was his mamma’s duplicate while Angie was a mirror of her daddy Jon. Slowly over many surgeries Angie became James, in fact if you dressed them the same no one would have been able to tell who was whom at a distance. Now she’s gone too far and doesn’t even resemble anyone in her family, or even herself. Large head with a wide , square jawline ending in a very strong wide chin. Nose chiseled down to nothing in Michael Jackson style, one eye lower than the other and a forehead that is trying to escape her head. Not a pretty sight any more. It’s a pity.@WCKitty:

    Reply
  68. joanne said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    @joanna:
    The dragon is out of what?

    Reply
  69. joanna said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:36 pm

    I meant to say the Dragon is out !! Did that come across x

    Reply
  70. joanna said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:44 pm

    Sorry I am ne here and to be honest when A ngelin Jolie first had the film that got me was tomb whatever , I have been very intrested in her since , but I also loved friends and Jen so I am sorry if i do not have the expertise as you all have just felt you was all welcome , to new people here im from london and all my friends i talk to went off jolie when what happened happend !! as we all know , all I want to do is try and say my point but if i have upset anyone im sorry x

    Reply
  71. WCKitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    @joanna:
    Hello! You have not upset me. :)

    Reply
  72. joanne said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:50 pm

    This joanne and joanna is confusing me.

    Reply
  73. joanna said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:53 pm

    I am Joanna from north london England , I have always watched here but never comment as a little nervous !

    Reply
  74. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:55 pm

    @joanna:
    The first link worked. Welcome.

    Reply
  75. joanna said on December 5th, 2011 at 9:56 pm

    I love the way you all comfront and I love the clues , And I love talking to my friends what you all think , we have so much too but sometimes we feel silly to put it here anyway its late here in london off to bed but would be lovely to feel welcomed xxxx

    Reply
  76. Guest2 said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:06 pm

    @joanna:
    You confused me because I didn’t notice the “a” at the end of your name and I thought you were our regular joanne talking to yourself/herself. Sorry, joanne but I was beginning to think you were a little tipsy when I thought you were asking yourself questions :)

    Reply
  77. joanne said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:08 pm

    @joanna:
    I didn’t know if you meant it was out in the theaters or out of the race for the oscars. welcome.

    Reply
  78. joanne said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:09 pm

    @Guest2:
    :lol:

    Reply
  79. Patty Anne said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:09 pm

    Please don’t feel as if you have to censor yourself here joanna. Each and every one of us was new here at one time or another, so we understand how it feels. Relax and jump into the chatter. If anyone blasts and insults you, it’s a troll for Jolie aka loonATIC. You’ll be able to recognize them by their attack mode so just scroll over them and ignore it like we do. Welcome to the thread ….@joanna:

    Reply
  80. Dream said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    @joanna:

    Hi joanna
    no reason to be nervous we are kind to anyone who is kind.
    welcome.

    Reply
  81. Guest2 said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:19 pm

    The Addams Family…why are they all dressed in black? Granny Pitt has a soft cast on her left hand.

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2606894/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-blood-honey-premiere-05/

    Reply
  82. rushdog said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:23 pm

    @joanna:
    Welcome to the board. Don’t be nervous, although I probably was too when I first started posting!

    Reply
  83. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:31 pm

    @joanna:

    Welcome :)

    Reply
  84. rushdog said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:33 pm

    So Ian’s tagged this as “the end is near.” I wonder how near to the end that would be. I bet at least part of this clue relates to the couple. I thought posts from last summer and fall indicated that the end would be after awards season. On an earlier thread Child of Medusa said the end was earlier than we thought because he wasn’t going to make it much longer, or something to that effect. Maybe the lawsuit caused him to reconsider and move it up a bit, like before the end of this year or at the beginning of next year. Forty days from the date of the “moo turkey” post (see the first quote) is January 1st. Hmm….

    And who is Child of Medusa anyway?! Hmm…

    Reply
  85. rushdog said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:38 pm

    @Guest2:
    “Granny Pitt” – hilarious. I really believe his parents are there to support their son as a way for him to get out and that was the whole purpose of TT and her movie. Get her situated so she’s comfortable and has something set for the future, then he can step out.

    Reply
  86. Evil Kitty said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    @rushdog:

    I get the feeling COM is in their circle somehow. I also enjoy his/her posts. To be honest, I would really be shocked if they announced a split.. I think they see whoever they want and are no longer a real couple, only coparenting and staying together for PR. Whatever fakery they’ve got going now seems to placate their fans, so why split up.

    Reply
  87. Bob said on December 5th, 2011 at 10:59 pm

    The photos of JP squared — too funny that she is dressed in white from head to toe, like a not-so-subtle declaration of innocence. Also noticed that People has upped the positive publicity. I am interested to see how the mainstream/non-gossip news covers the lawsuit.

    Reply
  88. whatever said on December 5th, 2011 at 11:35 pm

    I wonder if Brad Pitt promised to put into something substantial in the elder Pitts Christmas stockings this year, to have them present for this premiere??

    Where is Jolie’s family? Why aren’t they their supporting her? After all this is her BIG premiere…….

    Reply
  89. Up the Coast said on December 5th, 2011 at 11:56 pm

    @whatever:
    Jon must have asked her about the lawsuit….and she had to cut him out again :( when will he ever learn?

    Reply
  90. Guest2 said on December 5th, 2011 at 11:59 pm

    @whatever:
    I wondered that too. You would think her father and brother would be there to support her in her directorial debut. Where is james haven? He hasn’t been seen in a very long time.

    Reply
  91. Patty Anne said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:10 am

    She probably lost the hand wrestling contest with angie so she had to make an appearance.@Guest2:

    Reply
  92. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:12 am

    @rushdog:
    I’ve also wondered who COM is. She/he has said more than once that the brand is over and I think (not certain) she is the one who said that aj has brad where she wants him because that’s what she does or words to that effect.

    Reply
  93. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:27 am

    @Patty Anne:
    She put on a better act than her husband. He couldn’t even fake a smile. There are some pics of angie and jane on FF where jane has a death grip on angie’s arm and angie looks buzzed. They were also saying on FF (might have been a loon) that the pitts were in the audience during her interview on abc. What will we gossip about if they do split?

    It’s almost time for Nightline but don’t think I can stay up for that. Nite all.

    Reply
  94. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:33 am

    Shouldn’t the actors be at this premiere of hers?

    Reply
  95. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 1:08 am

    @Up the Coast:
    The actors from the film are there, I believe. Not sure about any other actors.

    Reply
  96. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 1:49 am

    @rushdog:
    Thanks…I finally found some pictures of her, with the actors.

    Reply
  97. Mez said on December 6th, 2011 at 1:56 am

    @Up the Coast:
    LOL

    Reply
  98. WTF said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:27 am

    @Guest2:
    James was there with his girlfriend…..FF has pictures of him

    Reply
  99. Brown Sugar said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:05 am

    You Haters are some nasty Shit, Thankfully Angelina is surrounded by all the people that love her, her man Brad, the elder Pitts and her brother James. To top it off her movie is getting Raves and that Nasty Asshole Braddock will get whats coming to him which is Nada and be laughed out of court. So you Nasty Vermins can bring Mr Braddock on. Go Angelina do what you do best, Chew them up and spit them out.

    Reply
  100. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:24 am

    @WTF:
    Thanks, I’ll check them out tonight.

    Reply
  101. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:30 am

    Just found a pic of James at CB. He looks older but good and his gf is cute, normal looking. I really like Nana’s handbag.

    http://www.celebitchy.com/195680/angelina_jolie_in_black_sack_separates_for_blood_honey_lovely_or_boring/

    Reply
  102. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:36 am

    This is too funny. Supposedly brad is having jen and justin over for Christmas drinks. I wonder if angie will be there. Maybe they can have a 4some, haha. Sorry, gross, I know. BBL.

    http://www.showbizspy.com/article/241261/brad-pitt-and-jennifer-aniston-to-meet-over-christmas.html

    Reply
  103. whatever said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:18 am

    @Brown Sugar:

    Her movie is getting raves? From who? Can you share the links that she is getting rave reviews of her movie?? I am talking about the serious critics, not some loons on a blog site.
    As for Braddock, you loons thought he was just blowing smoke. That he was some nutjob just trying to get attention. He proved you wrong. He filed a claim in the U.S. Federal Court. He has a strong claim. This is moving forward in a court of law, unless of course, Jolie, GK, Serkic (sp?) all decide to settle out of court, and IF that happens it will only PROVE further that the TRUTH is on Braddock’s side and that you’re idol is nothing but a LIAR and a FRAUD.

    As for Jolie being around people who love her. Each and everyone of those people that supposedly “loves” her has a financial stake in both of them remaining financially successful. Brad supplements his parents income, and Jolie supplements her brothers income. They are literally “working” for that financial support. Brad of course, is part of the corporation called Brangelina, and he needs her to try to remain successful because of the stock in them both is slipping. She goes down, he goes down with her.. and vice’ versa…simple as that.

    BTW, his Moneyball movie has BOMBED internationally. Even in Japan, their “beloved” France and the UK. Where Brad has been quite successful in the past in those markets…..his movie failed to garner support.

    Reply
  104. louisianagurl said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:23 am

    @rushdog:
    I was going to give this one a go, but it looks like you nailed it. I am all in with your take.
    :-)

    Reply
  105. Brown Sugar said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:59 am

    You idiots, anyone including a fucking nutjob like Braddock , can file a claim its the outcome that matter. The only people giving him a platform are you Heffers and the Gossip rags. He will be laughed or rather his nonsensical claim will be thrown out of court where it belongs, As you can see the premier was covered by serious journalists and not gossip TV such as The Insider, Enternainment Tonight or Showbiz Tonight who were not invited. They have to wait and get second hand reporting from the likes of Christiane Amanapour. Thats the power of The Jolie. Go Angie, love your style.

    Reply
  106. Brown Sugar said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    Whatever you are a complete ASSHOLE. Go get a Job.

    Reply
  107. louisianagurl said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    ok…couldn’t resist…i am avoiding work!! :-) Here goes:

    Emaciated thinspo… AJ is listed as “The Queen of the Starvation Scene” – Thinspo is the name of pro anorexia groups on the web

    going from black to red… From the Black Sea to the Red Sea, from Istanbul to Damascus, and from Ephesus to Baalbek to Palmyra to Petra, one visa would fit all. – nod to AJ travel and maybe covert operations in the middle east area. Could freely move from place to place

    yelling at the moon… A website who’s first entry shows comment on: “President Obama’s, Vice President Biden’s and House Speaker Pelosi’s reaction to Joe “You Lie” Wilson’s comment. His career is over.”…Nod to position AJ is currently in…although in this scenario the one that yelled “you lie” is the one whose career is over…hmmm…

    whisky for the holy ghost…Album by Mark Lanegan – The recording was reportedly a frustrating affair; at one point the singer had to be physically prevented from throwing the master tapes into a river. Despite the album’s slow gestation and Lanegan’s notorious substance abuse problems, the songs on Whiskey for The Holy Ghost sound remarkably cohesive. Lyrically, Lanegan continues to delve into the darker side of the human experience. Other songs reveal a beautiful vulnerability. – Could be a translation of AJ/BP relationship…screwed up, but theirs…they make it work.

    deprivation amblyopia…Vision problem created when the retina does not receive a clear image… I don’t think this is literal, I think this is more about us not having a clear image of the real “BRAND” and therefore make assumptions on incorrect info from the media…

    sauntering with thoreau… Henry David Thoreau, Walking (excerpt on Sauntering):
    “I have met but one or two persons in the course of my life who understood the art of Walking, that is, of taking walks–who had a genius, so to speak, for sauntering, which word is beautifully derived ‘from idle people who roved about the country, in the Middle Ages, and asked charity, under the pretense of going à la Sante Terre,’ to the Holy Land, till the children exclaimed, ‘There goes a Sainte-Terrer,’ a Saunterer, a Holy Lander. They who never go to the Holy Land in their walks, as they pretend, are indeed mere idlers and vagabonds; but they who do go there are saunterers in the good sense… For every walk is a sort of crusade, preached by some Peter the Hermit in us, to go forth and reconquer this Holy Land from the hands of the Infidels.” – nod to AJ and her search for…What?

    how much can be garnished…how much will be taken for the sins of the mother?

    slippery butta side gloves!!!!! – Protective equipment that give you added control. – AJ is circling the wagons to do damage control

    Reply
  108. Cardak said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    @whatever:
    whatever, the movie is getting raves from Brown Sugar.

    Reply
  109. joanne said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:29 pm

    @whatever:
    Great post and I agree.

    Reply
  110. Jaded said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:53 pm

    @Cardak:

    ITLOBAH is getting rave reviews at Brown Sugar? I’m not familiar with this site. Could you (anyone) provide a link or the full address? Thanks.

    Reply
  111. Jaded said on December 6th, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    “the end is near” is Pitt threatening to snuff out the candle (messenger) again
    “the messenger rang out again” = for whom the bells tolls

    Reply
  112. whatever said on December 6th, 2011 at 1:11 pm

    @Brown Sugar:

    So in other words, you can’t provide PROOF that In the Land of Blood and Honey movie is getting rave reviews, and in doing so, you can’t defend what you said with actual facts so you need to deflect by hurling insults. Typical LOONISH behavior.

    BTW, I own a very successful marketing business. So I don’t “need to go get a job”. But thanks for caring.

    Although I do agree on your stance that anyone person can file a claim. If said claim had absolutely no merit to it, a judge will rule to throw it out. As it stands, this case is being read over by Judge Robert Dow, Jr. IMO, This case will move forward because it has a strong complaint (btw did you read it or are you just using talking points handed by your other loons from loonville?)., IF the various listed defendants wish to settle the matter out of court, and the plaintiff agrees to a settlement they bring to the table, then this won’t be drawn out in court. If not, Braddock along with his very esteemed legal staff have every intention of having this heard in the United States Federal Court. He has a very esteemed legal team.. of Belongia, Shapiro & Franklin LLP based out of Chicago. One of their attorney’s Kelly Saindon has been a guest on Fox News, Bill O’Reilly, speaking about legal rights regarding privacy rights vs free speech. This isn’t some fly by night, legal team either! They apparently believe that Mr. James Braddock, has a solid case…..

    You can read up on his legal team at:

    http://belongialaw.com/main/

    Here is the claim:

    http://206.18.146.25/rfcViewFile/11cv8597.pdf

    Now throw some more insults my way. At least I back up what I say with facts. You never have. It’s all just talking points that are just getting so ridiculously redundant.

    Reply
  113. whatever said on December 6th, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    Oh and just one more point, BS…

    It has been picked up by ALL major news outlets here in the USA and around the world…. there is something called GOOGLE, I know, I know, you only think there is only 3 sites on the internet, Ian’s, Celebitchy and Just Jared….but seriously stop embarrassing yourself by trying to debate me. I will win with FACTS to back up what I say, and not smoke and mirrors and reguritated talking points handed to you by someone in Jolie’s camp..

    Reply
  114. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    @Cardak:
    LOL!!!

    Reply
  115. Dream said on December 6th, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @Jaded:
    Would you really want to go there?

    Reply
  116. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    @Bob:
    Clever find!

    @Patty Anne:
    Hahaahaha, Patty Anne that’s brilliant. :)

    Reply
  117. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:27 pm

    OK, for fun :) I’m looking at the pic w/the “yellingatmoon” scroll. The pics are chosen for a reason and represent something, ha!

    It’s a star wars pic.
    1st frame Anakin(?) sitting on r2d2 yelling/pointing in the direction of the
    2nd frame w/hooded character w/a red lightsaber which is the dark side & facing the 1st frame. A lightsaber blade is round, no edge. There is no side of the blade that does not cut.
    3rd frame – female w/glasses, businesslike, smiling & looking at the
    4th frame – male in suit looking in the direction of the female in the 3rd frame, also businesslike, is not angry but doesn’t appear to be happy either

    So I wonder if this is supposed to represent four people or two couples. Or one couple with split personalities…fighting at times, acting nice at others…. No, I’m going with the two couples, the left two frames represent BP/AJ (fighting/dark side) and the right two JA/JTx (businesslike/friendly).

    Reply
  118. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    @Jaded:
    http://www.delusional.com

    Reply
  119. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    @whatever:
    You are right.

    Reply
  120. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:45 pm

    @louisianagurl:
    Nice Job :)

    Reply
  121. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    Hahaha :shock:

    Reply
  122. Dream said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:51 pm

    @rushdog:
    thats how i saw it. well minus all the good research and actual points.lol

    Reply
  123. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    Great job everyone. Can’t add anything, you’ve got it covered.

    Thanks Ian, I’ve read up on Thoreau because of this – very interesting. I’ve also discovered what a “slide glove” is – I thought “slippery butta side gloves” was a reference to Jolie’s butt pads sliding all over the place!

    Came upon this article from Dec 2010 criticising Jolie for trying to copy Elizabeth Taylor and Audrey Hepburn, but failing to produce good films in their league. Funny that the writer says Jolie’s on her third strike – just like UTC was saying about Brad in the last thread. There are some comments made by “ligaya” at the end which seem to come from someone on Jolie’s payroll:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/dec/04/angelina-jolie-taylor-hepburn

    Reply
  124. Patty Anne said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    Exactly Cardak, because B.S. HAS NO JOB, which is why she tells everyone else to “get a job” for referrences? Poor thing. Guess Jolie doesn’t pay her LOONatic’s that much.@Cardak:

    Reply
  125. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    @louisianagurl:
    I like your take on the slippery butta gloves clues. They are trying to do major damage control and that’s why all the interviews with legitimate news outlets like ABC, etc. Maybe they are trying to get the press on their side for the upcoming storm of the lawsuit. I also agree with your take on the relationship between AJ/BP. They’ve become a business and I think that whatever activities they are involved in they are in together. MIR is named in the lawsuit and that is really brad’s charitable foundation. I don’t see them splitting anytime soon but I could be wrong.

    Reply
  126. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    @Armitage:
    Wow…joLIE’s minions aren’t very well rounded are they? ligaya says: “Are you Californian? That’s the only place I know where a third strike has context.” Really??? What about BASEBALL??? Doesn’t everybody know about baseball? ;) She needs to get her head out of joLIE’s butt and look around…..

    Reply
  127. Patty Anne said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:14 pm

    Jolie’s support team has been attempting to create a new image for her, a more successful one mind you, for some time. She became a hit with teen aged boys playing a video game heroine, Lara Croft. That gave her the impression that she was “all that and more”…. a “great actress”….and so it began. Unfortunately for a formerly A-Listed, highly successful actor named Brad Pitt, Jolie convinced him that she is indeed a high dollar, A-List, talented actress. Next came A Mighty Heart which should have been renamed, A Mighty Phart In The Wind as it smelled for awhile then evaporated into nothing. The Changeling, SALT, The Tourist….only her voice over cartoons are successful. SO~! No huge success here, what to do? Ah Ha! Reinvent her….again. Great Humanatarian! Oh Well, that failed. Now she’s a writer/director. Yep, that’s it. She wrote the story in a couple of feverish, flu suffering hours locked in a room all by herself. Oh~! But wait! She just told Amanpour she wrote the story with her kids running around her. Hmmmm, could she be a , gasp!, LIAR? That’s the career for Jolie: Professional Liar and Fan Magnet to the lunatics of the celebrity adoration society….helloooo B.S.@Armitage:

    Reply
  128. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:20 pm

    @Guest2:
    Brad has been trying to extricate himself from this “situation” for several years now. When NOTW printed the story about them, we know now, they were RIGHT. It was true. They had a set schedule, at that time, and joLIE keeps adding things to that list/schedule. She can go on forever, adding this and that, to the list. (She will let him go after this happens, or after that happens). It’s a game to her. That’s why sometimes, we see Brad happy…..then he looks exhausted and beaten……kind of like how he looks at the premiere. The end has been near for a long time. But Ange keeps reaching into her bag of tricks, and pulling out another problem. I believe that she is in 7th heaven right now….she’s the center of attention and there’s a problem on the horizon that everyone will have to fix for her….but as long as it’s ALL about her, she’s happy.

    Reply
  129. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:22 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :)

    Reply
  130. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:31 pm

    @louisianagurl:
    I’m trying to combine people’s thoughts w/yours and then pare it down to easy. I’m not really sure about “black to red” and “yelling at the moon” (which may be key because it’s also the scroll). Could yelling at the moon be literal – screaming at night? It would fit with the 1st two frames of the picture.

    A different take on garnish – a decoration; to decorate with color or flavor

    Another guess:
    Emaciated thinspo – AJ
    going from black to red – changing color – ?personality
    yelling at the moon – screaming at night
    whisky for the holy ghost – cohesive despite notorious drug abuse problems
    deprivation amblyopia – faulty image projection
    sauntering with thoreau – every public appearance a crusade
    how much can be garnished – decorated with color & flavor
    slippery butta side gloves!!!! – for damage control!!!!

    The photo cartoon – Frame 1 & 2 – fighting Frame 3 & 4 – businesslike/friendly

    “The Messenger Rang Out Again” and “the end is near” – word is out, he’s done again/not taking any more, ending soon

    Reply
  131. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:54 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    So how do we know she’ll let him go now? She could throw another monkey wrench into the works. This split talk has been going on for a very long time and we always thought it would be after this or that event. But they keep showing up together and lived together through the filming of WWZ. Wouldn’t you think that two people on the verge of splitting would be living more separately? I’m not saying I think they have a loving romantic relationship because I don’t think that at all. In fact, judging from their body language I think they probably detest each other. I do think it is a business arrangement that isn’t going to end anytime soon. Not unless brad reclaims his b*lls and is willing to deal with the consequences of walking out on her or she decides she wants him the hell out of her life. I know the clues seem to suggest otherwise but they have at other times too. JMO, don’t get mad at me :)

    Reply
  132. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 3:58 pm

    @rushdog:
    I like this different take on garnish….it fits well with the rest of the clues. Looking at Brad’s behavior, at the premiere, he seems so over it. Jane’s manic grin might be cuz she’s happy that Brad has finally come to his senses. IMO, joLIE is her own worst enemy. She can’t help herself. She can’t stop being crazy, and eventually her weird behavior is going to come out, they can’t keep a lid on it forever.

    Reply
  133. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    @Guest2:
    I think it’s because Brad has no legal right to any of the kids. When she says that they are more comitted because of the kids…..that’s what she means. Ange isn’t the kind of person who likes to share, she doesn’t even have friends. Brad knows that if he isn’t under her thumb, he will be dead to her, just look at her dad :(

    Reply
  134. whatever said on December 6th, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    Yanno what? This relationship has been coming to an “end” for 6 yrs now. So I don’t believe that it is their relationship coming to an end, but their careers, and they are finally going to be exposed for the frauds and liars they are. . Jolie has really stepped in it this time, and there is no wiggle room out of it. Either she acknowledges the fact that she lied about her writing this screen play, by settling with Braddock, or it is shown in court that she is a liar, thief and a fraud. She doesn’t want the FEDS investigating their finances, and believe me, IF this goes to court, the one thing that will happen is a full financial disclosure of Jolie’s finances, including those various foundations.

    If Brad Pitt wanted out of this relationship, he is a grown man, and can walk away. Same as her. Whatever it is that keeps them together, be it the kids, their career, their BRAND, they are still together. If they are happy or miserable together, I don’t care anymore. I honestly hope they both stay together, because those kids need a 2 parent household, no matter how dysfunctional their lifestyle is.

    What I am just sick to death of the media shoving it down our throats that these people are the King and Queen of Hollywood, The most beautiful couple in the world. When all of us have eyes and brains, and we can read, box office charts, we read/hear the multiple LIES they tell, we can see they are both deteriorating right in front of us, they don’t live up to the hype bestowed on them.. I am tired of the media worshiping 2 cheaters, liars, frauds, and child hoarders who will not put those kids needs first, and making it seem like this is the type of characteristics to idolize.

    Reply
  135. sinker said on December 6th, 2011 at 4:18 pm

    Maybe AJ damaged eye w/ botox or plastic surgery.

    Mark Lanegan has had a long history of problems w/ heroin.

    End is near – morbid, but… there were rumors about hep c or possibly hiv w/ aj (past drug use). maybe treatments aren’t working. or maybe they told her quit all drugs (methadone?) and she hasn’t./won’t.

    and whatever, agree w/ a lot of what you say. i would never have given one crap about AJ until she started buying children. when you drag innocent children into your self-centered “me me ME” because you are rich enough to buy them, and then sell them after you buy them (People mag), that is a crime against humanity IMO. infuriates me that she gets away w/ it.

    Reply
  136. Kate said on December 6th, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    Do you think ANGIE teaches her children some of the words you like to use? Were you not concerned what content our children might be learning from us just a few days ago? Do you think Bill and Jane would be impressed with your filthy mouth? Why are you wasting so much emotion on a star that has said they, yes they feel people like you must have a missing link ( nice way way of saying nut job) to be so involved in their lives. They do not care what you or any other fans think right now, only their peers and critics, and that is not you.

    Reply
  137. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Yeah, “three strikes and you’re out” is very well known here. We use lots of your sports terms – they hop over the Atlantic! We understand their meaning but don’t always know a lot about the sports.

    Reply
  138. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 5:00 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Her house of cards has to come falling down some day – her career, beauty and saintly mom image is built on such a flimsy foundation. There is no substance to it all. Everything about her is contrived. Her team have had a good run, but it’’s now time to wind it up. Aaah, just imagine HW and the tabloids without the Brand Inc.!

    Reply
  139. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 5:10 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I like this guess better than my first guess. Would also fit with Child of Medusa’s thoughts on the other thread esp if COM is somehow connected to him.

    I think it would also fit with what you feels ails her. I don’t like to post about that stuff but I believe you’ve indicated a personal experience in this area. You may be right with your thoughts here. Maybe it’s a combination of ailments. And it would certainly explain his appearance at times and why he might have finally (again?) just said enough.

    Reply
  140. Patty Anne said on December 6th, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    They will evolve toward the younger fans who have money to blow on films starring their idols: Twihards. Those who adore Kristin Stewart and Rob Pattinson, the NEW Brangelina. Brad is pushing hard on 50 y/o, Angie is rushing toward 37 but looks 57 at least so how much longer can they draw a crowd? Even the loons facination with the infants and their photos is long gone now that Maddox is 10 and the rest are following in ages. That’s why she is looking for another more lasting direction. Brad? It is my opinion that she could care less how he fares, psychopaths are always about themselves …only. Brad served her purpose and now she’s finished with him. Remember she said she did not chase after a married man but that he just showed up one day and remained? That’s love?!? lol @Armitage:

    Reply
  141. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 5:37 pm

    @rushdog:
    Rushdog, I had some thoughts that didn’t seem to take me anywhere so I didn’t mention them, but you might be able to make a link – “black to red” made me think of Jolie often appearing in black on the red carpet but lately she’’s switched to red gowns. “Yelling at the moon” took me to 30 Rock – Tina Fey’s character Liz Lemon yells at the moon with Buzz Aldrin in the show. Tina (the writer) and Liz are fans of Star Wars and Tina tries to get a Star Wars reference in every show if she can. I don’t know the show so can’t say if the storyline fits in any way.The cartoon pics in Ian’s clue have a woman who looks like Liz and a Jedi knight/Luke Skywalker character. Luke Skywalker is one of fraternal twins (ref to Knox and Viv?) who snogged his twin before realising it was his sister (Jolie and James?) and has a battle with his evil father (James and Jon?)…..tenuous links I know!

    Reply
  142. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    “a couple of feverish, flu suffering hours” “Gasp – a liar”

    You’re hot today PA!!

    Reply
  143. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    @Armitage:
    I’m really going to have to think all this for a while!

    Reply
  144. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 5:56 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I suppose they think that rejuvenating themselves so frequently with face lifts will keep them in favour with the Twilight fans – Brad’s face looks tweaked again in the pics at Jolie’s premier. Tom Cruise keeps going with Mission Impossible and has several films in the pipeline. Brad was going to make and star in a film based on the computer game Dark Void. If he cleans up his image I can see him having a go at that kind of character and making a franchise out of it, like R Downey Junior and Iron Man. They may need to split and get younger partners like Tommy, though.

    Reply
  145. bellum said on December 6th, 2011 at 6:06 pm

    Maybe the Black to Red has a different meaning as well. I could have something to do with the guns and Hoe’s latest movie perhaps she has crossed a line. like Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia It was a socialist state and a federation made up of six socialist republics: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia. Serbia, in addition, included two autonomous provinces of Vojvodina and Kosovo and Metohia. Maybe she has dealings with Serbia, New Communist Party of Yugoslavia

    Reply
  146. joanne said on December 6th, 2011 at 6:28 pm

    @whatever:
    I am also tired of the media shoving this garbage down our throats. I would like something better to dumb me down.

    Reply
  147. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 6:36 pm

    @rushdog:
    Yes, I have :( and I feel that joLIE is in her element, on a chaotic roller coaster…she even says she looks out the window and wishes she were somewhere else. She has to have 20 irons in fire, all at once, as long as everyone around her are the ones responsible for those irons. It’s a never ending whirlwind of emotional highs and lows…and it’s a living hell for everyone around a person like this. There is no doubt in my mind that the children will always have issues in their lives, because their baseline is chaos and always being on the move. That kind of lifestyle/routine is laying the groundwork for her to easily brainwash them (Brad) with her illogical logic (magic thinking). I know people laugh at this, because they think it sounds ridiculous or over dramatic….but it’s a slow, methodic process, it doesn’t happen overnight.
    We watch her use the children for photo ops, and we’re appalled….I can only imagine what Brad has heard her threaten she will do with them, if he EVER goes against her, in any way :shock:

    Reply
  148. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 6:37 pm

    @Armitage:
    That is deep!

    Reply
  149. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 6:39 pm

    @joanne:
    We need to dummy up ;)

    Reply
  150. Jaded said on December 6th, 2011 at 6:55 pm

    @Guest2:
    No more delusional than anyone else here. Who’s to say which interpretations are correct? IH never provides feedback. Maybe I have an inside track.

    Reply
  151. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:07 pm

    hi everyone! haha jolie is getting some heat blown her way. blech!!!
    i just watched a couple clips from christiane amanpour’s wet kiss for jolie.
    omgawd! how many times do we have to hear she covered the bosnian war extensively or that they sat down at the CFR to chat about her vanity crap about sheeple committing heinous acts against those they claim to love?
    f that! amanpour is like any other talking head, she is a mockingbird. a trumpeter of the arab spring like jolie, a past accuser of those who did not believe the fairy tale 9/11 bs as falling under the spell of al qaeda. what a shill. she is still defending the US role in libya as humanitarian. she lived a cushy life with her mother and father under the shaw of iran, then when all hell broke loose she was spirited out to study here. these high minded people who claim they are in a position to know it all and tell us what to believe is true or tell us who we can choose from for president are lackey trash. they know the truth, but they propagate the lie. http://danwismar.com/uploads/Bernstein%20-%20CIA%20and%20Media.htm
    and this little gem jolie let flop out from between those baboon ass lips, that she wrote it while the kids ran around her. omgawd, both of these trogs have admitted that neither of them alone can handle all 6 of their children at once on a good day. but she blurts out that she handled at least some of them and wrangled a wretched flu and wrote a bosnian war movie script ALL at the same time? did she excuse the kiddies from the room before she blew clint too?

    Reply
  152. janindisguise said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    hahaha. Yes.

    Reply
  153. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:19 pm

    siska, i am watching the very first episode of ‘offspring’ tonight.
    seal of approval from janiston’s dad for theroux.
    but did he say theroux is approved for a romance or just a fauxmance? :P
    they are a gorgeous couple and i hope they and the dandeho stay together, but each couple in their respective corner, of course. and at least from jolie’s mouth right now, dandeho sounds like it has been cemented in 6 children’s worth of commitment.

    Reply
  154. Patty Anne said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:19 pm

    True. Also judging by Brad’s lopsided and painful looking grin last week I’d say he had too much Botox injected to look younger and it only served to make him look like he’d suffered a stroke. I also noticed when he tweaks his face his nose tends to blossom into an upside down mushroom. He’s not making himself look younger or even rested, just plastic as she does now. They have sucked the hawt out of one another in just six years so the only solution would be to separate and begin fresh. Jolie, being a psychopath, actually needs stimulation at all times, for them there is no such thing as a quiet moment or a peaceful time as they require constant drama to feel anything at all. I used to think I’d love nothing more than to see them stuck with one another for their lifetimes but now I think they must lead separate lives if they are to survive so that those six kids have at least one living parent down the road.@Armitage:

    Reply
  155. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    i know, but my digitd don’t….. it’s ’shah’ not ’shaw’.

    Reply
  156. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:32 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I think you’re right – her behaviour does look manic and the crazed grin on her face in the pics with Jane Pitt show a kind of elation and delight in all the attention she’s getting, while at the same time she needs handling to keep her on track. I think she found Pitt easy to influence, and as you say, it happened gradually and she eventually managed to persuade him that white was black and up was down and he thought that it all sounded reasonable. He totally lost sight of what was within the bounds of decent, prudent, acceptable behaviour because he was suggestible, naive and dissatisfied when she hooked up with him and prone to indulge in excess. He’s also a bit dim, of course! Having said that, Pitt has come across as ruthlessly manipulative himself, so I think they are a right pair of undesirables. Poor children.

    Reply
  157. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:36 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    And probably way off the mark! I’ve been trying to avoid getting down to some paperwork today and it’s been more fun to give my brain a little exercise the IUC way!

    Reply
  158. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    been looking at the happy family pix from cankerskank’s red carpet. it appears that brad pitt’s dad does not approve of brad pitt’s mom making sweet with brad pitt’s hobag.

    Reply
  159. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:47 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Totally agree Patty Anne! And you are making some brilliant jokes and comments tonight. :) Nearly midnight, so I’m off to bed now or I’ll turn into a pumpkin. See you tomorrow.

    Reply
  160. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    @Armitage:
    good nite armitage.

    Reply
  161. Armitage said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:53 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Hi SRW, Pitt senior looked like a trussed up beetroot in the pics I saw (red face, tight suit) and, yes, he doesn’t look amused by the pimping charade he’s taking part in, does he – tee hee! Reallly am going now, nite.

    Reply
  162. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 7:57 pm

    @joanna:
    hi joanna! welcome!

    Reply
  163. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:02 pm

    @Armitage:
    ‘trussed up beetroot’
    hahahahahaaaaa
    yes he did! and if he doesn’t man up and become more pussy whipped for the HO, she will gladly make some borscht out of him.

    Reply
  164. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:05 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Nice to see you back SRW :)

    Reply
  165. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:07 pm

    http://www.angrygreekgirl.com/2011/12/06/baba-yaga-is-being-sued-for-plagiarism

    “Loons, before I begin this post, thank you so very much for wishing death on my father and for telling me to climb into the coffin with him! I cannot tell you how much your emails have meant to me!….

    Anyway, in completely surprising news, Baba Yaga DID NOT write an entire screenplay in two days while being sick with the flu! Oh my God! I had NO idea! And in other news, Jenny Shimizu can piss into a urinal while standing thirty feet away from it!

    According to the Daily Mail: “In legal documents obtained by RadarOnline, James J. Braddock claims that an article he wrote and published in 2007 is the basis for the film, which the mother of six wrote and directed.”

    Baba Yaga, do you see what is happening here? This is what happens when you try to exploit the pain of others to make yourself look good. I know this may come as a shock to you, but some people may actually refuse to roll over and let you fuck them in the ass. Thank goodness James J. Braddock is one of these people.

    It is painfully clear that you are not a writer of any kind. Real writers do not write screenplays in two days. That is impossible. Writers are too full of self-doubt to complete anything in two days. Real writers can agonize over a single sentence for months. They can lose sleep over a word that doesn’t sound quite right. They can even abandon projects for years at a time when the writing process becomes too painful. Clearly, you have no idea what any of this feels like.

    You are a fraud and an impostor and I am so glad that someone is finally calling you out on your bullshit. I truly hope that James J. Braddock gets the recognition and compensation he deserves. Excuse me for the semi-serious post, but this is a topic that hits close to home.

    Admittedly, I have never respected Baba Yaga as an artist. I have never been a fan of her acting. However, I have always respected her right to express herself as an actress. On that note, this incident has wiped away every last bit of artistic integrity she has ever had. There is nothing left, Baba Yaga. Nothing left. I would tell you to beware of your conscience in a few years, but it is abundantly clear that you do not have one.

    Reply
  166. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    With all the people she employs, one of them should be able to keep track of her LIES! Don’t they have an app for that?

    Reply
  167. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    thanx doll!
    it’s great to see and catch up on all the comments i missed. jolie is takinga licking. ain’t it grand???? it makes her promotions to sell her movie much more enjoyable. it’s so funny to see these schooled tools ‘make noise like journalists’ and still not ask her one tiny question about the lawsuit over the movie she is claiming is her baby.

    Reply
  168. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:14 pm

    @Armitage:
    I know exactly what you mean… ;)

    Reply
  169. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    @Armitage:
    See you tomorrow…

    Reply
  170. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    hahahahaaaaa! i bet her zoo keepers wish they had one.

    Reply
  171. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:29 pm

    see you all later.

    Reply
  172. siska said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:33 pm

    thats is funny..I doubt it wll be happen..since his comment about his boring marriage..@Guest2:
    anyway..there are new pictures of justjen having dinner with Adam s and his wife at madeo resto..she seem really having relax time with jtx..

    Reply
  173. siska said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:42 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    I am glad you starting to watch it..hang on there its getting better on season 2..and if you watch both season..please tell me which team will you be..??
    He got approve for the real thing..I dont thing this is fauxmax..i can be wrong ..but jen usually introduce the man to her dad when the relation is serious..she might sometime going dinner with others for pr (like Gb or BC)..but not like this..
    I am with you to wish all the couple stick it out..specially Brangie..they are more entertain when they are together..cause they not shame to declare it to the world their love..and with all the kids..its better to stick it on..
    anyway..jen and jtx seem to have a year off to strengthen their relation..so cute..I saw the picture of justjen with adam sadler and wife came out from Madeo..Jtx seem more get along well with her friends..but wonder if she will introduce him to Tom h..remember how he critise about TH?…mmm

    Reply
  174. siska said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:45 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:I miss you just by minutes..he..he
    fyi..I also just finished the movie called Jane Erye..starring Mia K (the girl from Alice) and Michael F? (from x men)..its good english romance..the only weird part was..the girl seem too young..compare to the male lover..its romance with a bit touch of suspense..

    Reply
  175. siska said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:46 pm

    bye..cu all soon..

    Reply
  176. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    yay!

    Reply
  177. Patty Anne said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    Don’t cha just love it when someone has the balls to say it like it is without all the arse kissing? I applaud The Angry Greek Girl and wish much success to Mr. Braddock who is also known as Josip J. Knezevic. @selfffrighteouswhore:

    Reply
  178. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 8:57 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I love it :) and I completely agree with her that: “this incident has wiped away every last bit of artistic integrity she has ever had.”

    Reply
  179. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:09 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Or, should I say…that her daddies name afforded her.

    Reply
  180. Guest1 said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:19 pm

    @siska:
    I bought the UK version of seasons 1 and 2 of Downton Abbey on Amazon.uk (I’m in the U.S.). There is a trailer for Jane Eyre on the DVD’s. I had the same thought you did, that the actress is too young.

    Reply
  181. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:30 pm

    @Armitage:
    I do my best thinking when I’m cooking and driving, just letting thoughts float thru without too much thinking. I believe what you put aside is relevant. I now believe the picture posted is only about one couple, justjen is not a part of this clue in any way that I can see. The picture and the “yelling at the moon clue” tie to the 30 rock episode (Mother’s Day episode aired 5/6/10) where Liz (TF) realizes in the end that her imaginary dream man, Mike Dexter the astronaut, is never going to show so she yells at the moon in disappointment. Buzz Aldrin’s character spent years drinking, depressed and cheating.

    The black to red I still believe refers to a change in personality but maybe it’s a change in the personality of the couple from the black (behind the curtain/in private life) to the red (on the rc/in public). Again in the picture the 1st & 2nd frames show fighting w/the dark side (red light saber) in the 2nd frame – so in private they fight and that appears to be at night. In the 3rd & 4th frames the same couple are business during the day or when they’re in public.

    In the end it takes me back to my second guess after LAgurl’s post. Could emaciated thinspo be something other than her? It doesn’t really seem like it which is why I think the greater personality change is caused by her.

    Reply
  182. rushdog said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:

    Thanks for the Angry Greek post. Haven’t read her in a while. Great comments.

    Reply
  183. Evil Kitty said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:39 pm

    @rushdog:

    Rush, going off your thoughts, could it be that the yelling at the moon and the pics indicate the darkness or secrets coming to the light? As you mentioned, the first two pics are two people fighting, the second set amacable to each other. Jolie/Pitt behind closed doors, fighting, at each others throats, while in public they play nice, pretending to be the perfect couple. The yelling at the moon video with Buzz Aldren is him yelling at the moon which is out during the day and normally should be out at night. Maybe this indicates Jolie will not be happy when the secrets come to light. If they do split maybe it will be messy and secrets will be exposed.

    Reply
  184. Dream said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    @Jaded:
    i took that as the addy u were looking for from bs. a joke. maybe she meant something else but i did not see it as a diss to u.

    Reply
  185. Dream said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    hi srw nice to see u back.

    Reply
  186. Evil Kitty said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    @whatever:

    I like this post whatever and it makes sense, the end could be many different things including the public and media fascination with this two or their careers, reputations, fauxmanitarianism, etc. and the end of the Brad really does encompass all of this as it is all entertwined. As I said in my previous post, I think the yelling at the moon means the darkness coming to light or secrets being exposed.

    Reply
  187. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    @Dream:
    I just followed the links all the way back to the original comment….and it was NOT a diss to Jaded. It was just a joke (and a good one too).

    Reply
  188. Patty Anne said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:05 pm

    Mood swing? Manic = red and Depressed = black? Brad?@rushdog:

    Reply
  189. bellum said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    Just so we Remember
    “I had the flu,” Jolie says of how she came to write the script. “I had to be quarantined from the children for two days. I was in the attic of a house in France. I was isolated, pacing. I don’t watch TV and I wasn’t reading anything. So I started writing. I went from the beginning to the end. I didn’t know any other way.” She says she then let Brad take the script to read on a trip: “He called and said, ‘You know, honey, it’s not that bad.’”

    LOLz

    Reply
  190. Evil Kitty said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:14 pm

    @Evil Kitty:

    typo to my post. I meant to say end of the Brand, not end of the Brad.

    Now that I think of it though, he is looking pretty fem these days. He may decide to end the Brad and become Brandi. You never know.

    Reply
  191. Evil Kitty said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:16 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    Yep, you’re right. I took it as a diss to the loon BS and it was funny.

    Reply
  192. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:19 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    :lol: you never know…

    Reply
  193. Evil Kitty said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Kind of sounds like Bi Polar.

    Reply
  194. Dream said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:24 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    @Up the Coast:
    it was very funny and i should have said so at the time.

    Reply
  195. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:33 pm

    @Jaded:
    Jaded, I’m sorry, I was not saying you are delusional. When you asked for the link to the site Brown Sugar I thought you were joking so I played along and created a fictional link which was a diss to the fanatical jolie fan brown sugar. What I didn’t realize is that it’s an actual website that discusses insanity (how fitting to the topic at hand). I decided to check out the link after seeing UTC’s reaction to my post. She says so much with just a look. :) I I hope you’re not offended. I enjoy reading your comments. We never know how outlandish any guesses are because IH doesn’t give us feedback. But even when he in the past we were left just as clueless as with no feedback! I’m just happy he gives us these riddles to work on.

    Reply
  196. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    when he did (give us feedback)

    Reply
  197. Evil Kitty said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:38 pm

    @rushdog:

    While this thought is still in my head, cuz they don’t stay there long, tee hee, but I also thought maybe the emaciated thinspo thing could not be literal. Did someone here say there was a website where the anos give support to each other, not to get help, but to continue their problem? This makes me think the clue indicates those who do not want to help someone with an addiction, but only want to enable the addictions cuz they benefit in some way or as hangers on. Remember the Elvis clue and I thought then it had something to do with her having enablers like he did, hence the comparison. Then there is the clue about whisky for the holy ghost and how the album came out well despite one of the members being high all the time. Sounds to me like you know who.

    Reply
  198. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    @Guest2:
    OMGosh…that’s even funnier :grin:

    Reply
  199. Evil Kitty said on December 6th, 2011 at 10:53 pm

    @Guest2:

    My not so outlandish guess is the loons think Jolie’s movie is excellent cuz they are too dumb to read the subtitles so did not know what was going on and were given drugs to help them get through the rape scenes. Loons are delusional.

    Reply
  200. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:13 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    There’s a website for brown sugar too but I’m not going to link it here!

    Reply
  201. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:15 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    Yes, they are. I’m beginning to think some of these so-called journalists are too.

    Reply
  202. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:20 pm

    @siska:
    Siska, who is Tom H/TH?

    Reply
  203. Guest2 said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    Brad’s parents are very proud of angie and say she’s a great mom. On that note I’ll say good night.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/06/brad-pitts-parents-angelina_n_1131643.html?ncid=webmail2

    Reply
  204. Up the Coast said on December 6th, 2011 at 11:44 pm

    @Guest2:
    I wonder……If James Braddock’s parents were proud of him, the first time he wrote it? I wonder…..If Jon Voight is proud of his daughter? ;)

    Reply
  205. liv4 said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:08 am

    Don’t have much to add but I get the vibe from this blind that it is offering an answer as to why BP’s parents are doing the “walk of support” for AJ & ITLOBH.

    Reply
  206. Patty Anne said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:09 am

    Jon who? Ah, Angie just erases those who do not comply.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  207. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:34 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Do you think he asked her about the lawsuit? If I were him, I would have (just for fun).

    Reply
  208. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:37 am

    @Guest2:
    The lovely loons are putting Aniston down on that site. Poor delusional fanatics.

    Reply
  209. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:54 am

    @joanne:
    ;)

    Reply
  210. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:15 am

    @Up the Coast:
    If I were Jolie i would be embarrassed by the loons. They repeat the same phrases over and over again and insult other posters.

    Reply
  211. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:25 am

    @joanne:
    They aren’t deep thinkers….that’s for sure.

    Reply
  212. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 2:15 am

    @Guest2:
    i think dande is trying to steal janiston’s man from her! :P

    Reply
  213. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:04 am

    @siska:
    i watched the first episode of offspring. it WAS good. nina is a cutie. i’ll get back to ya on it.
    yeah, i was just kiddin’, its for real imo and looks to be doing them both good. her dad has a recipe for cinnamon toast, haha.
    hahaha…yes, i remember the hanks remark. i sort of think that theroux and hanks might have a clash of political attitudes as well.

    Reply
  214. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:05 am

    @siska:
    see ya! i’ll check out the mia k movie.

    Reply
  215. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:06 am

    @Up the Coast:
    hugs all around!

    Reply
  216. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:14 am

    @rushdog:
    you are welcome. glad u enjoyed reading it.

    Reply
  217. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:15 am

    @Dream:
    hi and thanx darlin.

    Reply
  218. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:18 am

    @Guest2:
    hi G2…tom hanks.

    Reply
  219. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:22 am

    @Guest2:
    mama pitt looks so young and whoreshine looks so old, they could be sisters. :P
    nite all.

    Reply
  220. checkmate said on December 7th, 2011 at 5:20 am

    i am a supporter of jen and justin but i also don’t hate brad and angelina. this blog is pro jen and justin so it is ok with me. but why do some perpetuate the non-existent connection of aniston and brad?????? jen’s own dad commented that brad and his daughter did NOT communicate.
    her father did say of justin that he was a “charming young man” so, he has dad’s approval. jen’s fans should focus on justin T now.

    Reply
  221. WTF said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:50 am

    My 2 cents – I don’t see Hollywood coming down with any flack on this plagerism thing. Its hard to prove – he had a concept based on actual events – he doesn’t “own” those events – there are hundreds of similar stories. I don’t see any end in sight for these 2 either- i’ve been lurking/posting here for gosh almost 3 years and every second post has them breaking up – it hasn’t happened. They will continue to co-exist in whatever way works for them.

    They are a business – He wants an Oscar and leaving her with 6 kids isnt’ going to win that for him. She wants recognition and isn’t going to jeopardize her hard bought new image any time soon. The kids – well i’m sure they are looked after regardless of the parents.

    hollywood and society hasn’t turned on Charlie Sheen with all his problems and even with the fact that Brooke is seeminly a raging crack head with twins – they are still being featured on Enterntainment shows like all is normal. Ashton blantly cheated on his wife -and still his show is pulling in viewers.

    society doesn’t CARE that these people are flawed. They are there to ENTERTAIN us – we all love the spectacle that even good / bad smut brings. We buy the magazines – watch the train wreck reality shows, go to their movies – read the gossip blogs because we need a break from OUR OWN reality sometimes.

    So yes a handful of people may say i’ll never watch another Jolie or Pitt movie again – but most wont’ care about their personal problems as long as they continue to entertain us. We can be outraged and disgusted by their actions but it won’t change THEIR REALITY.

    People WILL see this movie – if only for all the hype and controversy its generated – same as they see Tom Cruise movies regardless of the fact his religion is basically a cult, and Julia Roberts movies regardless that she broke up a home, and they’ll tune in to Charlies new show when it comes out to see how crazy he will be, and Johnny Depp movies regardless of his asinine comments lately, and same as the Kardashians aren’t going anywhere anytime soon regardless of their blatant greed and arrogance.

    We are the cause of these people – so WE have to own their celebrity status – we made them all who they are today.

    And thats how i see it :) – and discuss LOL

    Reply
  222. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:16 am

    @Guest2:
    tom hanks..I am miss you girls again..ok take care..I am having a chuckle with your fake site..he..he very naughty..

    Reply
  223. Guest2 said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:19 am

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Thanks, I didn’t know hanks was her friend or that jtx had criticized him. I thought it was ho trying to steal jen’s man but I guess the skinny jeans got to braddie too :)

    Reply
  224. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:19 am

    @Guest1:
    I think the version will be the same..Uk is the original..and the one in Us and Aussie..all the same version and actors..I think maybe they gave the young girl to play it..cause in that era..its normal for a very young girl to pair with older one?..but the movie is actually quite good..and no x rated stuff..just kissing..so not getting too weird..

    Reply
  225. Guest2 said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:23 am

    @siska:
    Hi siska, I just posted to SRW. Didn’t know about hanks. The joke was asking to be made but I feel bad that jaded thought it was about her. Sometimes the written word doesn’t come across the right way.

    Nice to see you but now I have to get ready for work. Bye.

    Reply
  226. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:28 am

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    she is cute..the actress who play her..win the most popular actress 2011 in aussie called Logies award kind like people choice award..she is married to he rocker hubby and openly admit didnt want child..she is very talented..i really want to talk to you about the actor on the season 2..but i will wait till you get there..

    fyi..this week in aussie tabloid mention about how controlling Jtx is..he made jen cut off relation with chelsea and CCox., made her spend less on big spender like chef (he cook for her…I doubt it..cause his friend admit he didnt cook),and her old life style, made her dress like him,not happy that she is friend with VV and JF..its seem they made him turn like Mark Anthony..he..he
    and the other mag saying about Brangie kids arrange mock wedding for them..really into detail how shiloh and Z plan the whole stuff..and surprise them..(not sure how they found out..but its cute if that really happen).

    Reply
  227. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:30 am

    @Guest2:
    I know you never intend other than light joke..I think she will understand..
    have a good day at work!!

    Reply
  228. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:31 am

    @WTF:
    good point!!..its all just for fun…

    Reply
  229. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:37 am

    @checkmate:
    yep..I am with you..but its hard to tell others..cause they have their own mind..anyway..i think its starting to change since Bp spoke about how boring his life with jen was..the reunion dream seem a bit shaky..and if jen stick with jtx ,,finally the triangle will die down finally and if Brangie finally married..that will make all of the stupid triangle dead..i still wonder why Brangie just get married already..they used to married before and they have 6 kids already..and always declare that they are so in love and soul mate to each other..so why drag it so long..( I dont buy the reason of gay marriage stuff that made them didnt married yet..its a bit pr toll)

    Reply
  230. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:38 am

    goodnight..take care lovely people!!

    Reply
  231. siska said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:39 am

    last one ..shout out for UPC..thanks for your good wish to my son!!

    Reply
  232. Guest2 said on December 7th, 2011 at 10:35 am

    This is the photo shoot from marie claire. Aj is using jen’s facial expressions from the black and white photos taken by TR. Maybe she’s sending a message to jtx that she can do jen better than jen. What a copy cat. If jen did this the loons would be all over it that she’s copying angie. She’s steals everything from everyone doesn’t she?

    http://www.celebitchy.com/195971/angelina_jolie_covers_marie_claire_i_could_get_pregnant_again/

    Reply
  233. Guest2 said on December 7th, 2011 at 10:37 am

    @Guest2:

    This woman is totally obsessed with aniston. Very weird.

    Reply
  234. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 11:32 am

    @Guest2:
    “anything she can do i can do better, i can do anything better than her.”
    she is mocking janiston. jolie IS obsessed with dande’s former wife not to take this fotoshoot and make it her own, especially when she just ripped off an author for more than a movie setting. braddock doesn’t own history, but he owns his own damn work. she IS stupid, why be obsessed over a former wife when there are six kids and a wide bed full of diapers and dildos to keep him happy? whoreshine should be going blonde any minute.
    on the MClaire cover she threatens that she ‘could get pregnant agian.’….hahahaha…octomom said the same thing after all her babies too. whoreshine and octomom should both dry up.

    Reply
  235. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 11:46 am

    @Guest2:
    goatbitch with a nippled bottle and belly full of wine crying on justjen’s shoulders. there will be fly on the wall laffing it’s ass off.

    Reply
  236. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    @siska:
    ok sis, i’ll let ya know as i make progress watching episodes.
    thanx for the aussie tab info. i love reading it all and picking and choosing what to believe. ;)
    theroux and janiston both seem like the type of person who wants to control his/her own body and their own life but i still don’t see where this long arm of theroux’s control is coming from. meh.

    Reply
  237. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    @Guest2:
    Thanks for the link. I noticed in the pics w/Jane Pitt how small shouldered Jolie is in comparison. JP appears to be a petite yet normal sized woman. In the link pics of AJ in the white coat she really does look thin, thin again – the shoulders, the face, everything. To me it’s the thinnest she’s looked since the summer of ‘07. I can appreciate the stress of film openings, particularly this film, but there’s more to it than that.

    Emaciated thinsp (? wasted posterchild) must refer to only her.

    Reply
  238. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:24 pm

    Emaciated thinspo…going from black to red…yelling at the moon…whisky for the holy ghost…deprivation amblyopia…sauntering with thoreau…how much can can be garnished…slippery butta side gloves!!!!!

    IMO, this is it: good job everyone!

    Ian’s source says, again: (like earlier this year)
    Her…mood swings…imaginary dream (wo)man no-show…held together despite drug use…producing faulty image…during public appearances…how much can be colored & flavored…for damage control.

    Pic: behind the scenes they fight w/him yelling while she wields words that cut from all sides. In public she’s sweet and charming while he’s annoyed w/controlled anger. (30 R. episode – Liz let’s go of the dream = he’s drinking and depressed, he’s letting go, done again)

    Now we watch and see if this goes anywhere!

    Reply
  239. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I think you’re right with the mood swings. I comes right after thinspo so it has to describe her.

    Reply
  240. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    @liv4:
    yes, “walk of support” – the garnish on Tuesday’s events. Serious damage control. She looked…bad off during the luncheon (was that what it was?) pics. If the relationship is good and there’s no merit to the lawsuit because her ducks are in a row and she did the work, she should be happy as a clam and looking fabulous.

    Her response that this (lawsuits) happen all the time and she used many sources describing a historical event is prepared talking points from the handlers. “We shred everyday” (see IranContra).

    The end is near. The Pitts were the garnish for this series of public events. Yep, that’s it.

    Reply
  241. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    @Evil Kitty:</a

    Reply
  242. Patty Anne said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:06 pm

    You are harboring the wrong idea here. Most of us are Pro-Jennifer, yes, but I know of no one here who would wish Brad Pitt on anyone and least of all Jennifer Aniston. The reason for Jennifer Pitt’s filing for divorce from her husband Brad Pitt is well known by anyone who read W magazine. His affair with Jolie is well documented, but……that’s their problem. It’s a scenario both Jolie and Pitt created so they must live it. Jennifer Aniston’s name has only been brought into it by rags wanting to sell issues. And I think I can say for most of us that we do not “hate” the persons ( Pitt and Jolie) but we do hate what they do. Hope this clears it up for you, you see, it’s actually the Jolie-Pitt Loons who think Jennifer would even consider being with someone who’s slept with the Town Pump as if he’s such a prize. We certainly do not consider him such. :-) @checkmate:

    Reply
  243. Patty Anne said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:08 pm

    Yes, and it’s quite possible Brad is bi-polar considering his mental break downs and his series of depression. Guess the life he’s living did not crack up to be all he thought it would. @Evil Kitty:

    Reply
  244. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    Sweeney Todd finale expresses that thought, yelli willng at the moon, the end is near, this seems to be relevant to the lawsuit more than them splitting. Theyy are in the same panic modeld people get in with the prediction of the world ending and they are try willing to control what they can. I doubt very much before noms are announced they will alter that decision, unless forced too. Doubtful.

    Reply
  245. Patty Anne said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    Yes, raving lunatic reviews. hehe@Cardak:

    Reply
  246. Patty Anne said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:11 pm

    I think daddy Jon is too afraid of rocking Angie’s mental rowboat to even think about asking her tough questions. Remember, like her mother Marcia Lynne, if you pizz off Angie she erases you from all existance in her troubled mind.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  247. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:17 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    @checkmate:
    I agree with what you’ve written PA. I would also add that the clues in this puzzle, from the beginning of the year, put JA in the puzzle and she’s there for a reason. Personally, I believe in the early months of the year BP was trying to make a switch and for whatever reason that didn’t work out. JA moved on,though the puzzle clues from Ian seem to indicate her current relationship is not real. Time will tell where all of this goes, maybe nowhere. I don’t want to see BP/JA back together – the “triangle” never ends in that scenario. Appreciate thoughts from both of you, just adding mine.

    Reply
  248. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    @Kate:
    Interesting take. I have to reiterate if there’s no merit to the lawsuit, just a routine thing, then there should be no need for such concern on their part. And I appreciate the seriousness of a lawsuit. She looks like she’s about to jump out of her skin on some of the photos.

    So the beginning of the clue: Her…mood swing…the end is near…held together despite drug use…

    Garnish = his parents = the redirect and keeping her calm.

    Maybe it’s not the end of the public relationship, but the end of the facade.

    On the previous thread the clue “senorita cucaracha” the three stooges do a pantomine (which originally was a Xmas/New Years event) in which they (the trio) is revealed as fakes. I can never tell how literal to take some of these clues, but the pantomine definition is interesting considering we in the holiday season. Maybe there is more threatening to be revealed.

    Reply
  249. sinker said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    If AJ had a one ounce of grace in her body, why not be gracious and acknowledge the coincidences? Wonder if Adam Waldman at Endeavor Group is handling this problem for her…..

    Reply
  250. checkmate said on December 7th, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    i think many, in spite of what is said, would certainly want brad back with JA. when “clues” from earlier in the year seem to point in that direction many here were overjoyed and welcomed it. i think that ship sailed 6 years ago. JA seems to have found someone she is happy with now and i am happy for her.

    Reply
  251. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    @rushdog:
    I wondered about that date also. If her movie release is blocked in the US that will put them in PR overdrive. I doubt very much she will ever admit any wrong doing. Her team will work this every possible way to clear her and make him look foolish. Brad is angry and stubborn, so I allow for that . He will defend even when they are not a couple , it is what he does. He did the same in past relationships. It is his anti-establishment characteristic, comes natural to him. He is more of a Tyler Durden than a George Clooney on any day, regardlessof what he wants the masses to believe. That is why he is miserable, he will never win.jmho. As for Jen and Justin,they are working it just as hard imo, and I still do not see anything beyond friendship. Nada. Maybe wrong, but they just never look like a real couple to me. Just another Vince. In Feb she was profoundly declaring she was going to get have a baby, get married, was posing with a teddy bear not that long ago, to now this? Matching rings, clothes, photo opps with SW, all ver very public in the face of cheating accusations, and right from the start, not 6 months later, but right out of the gate, matching rings, in your face, nope, that is manufacfactured to me or, if not… I do not have to say it. The other option is on Jolies level. I prefer not to believe that about Jen. Business , with someone else getting a backend paycheck. ;)

    Reply
  252. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 2:13 pm

    @checkmate:
    Jolies fans did to focus on that too.

    Reply
  253. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    @Guest2:
    Thats a lot like Anistons shoot. She really likes to steal identies.

    Reply
  254. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 2:19 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    :lol:

    Reply
  255. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @Guest2:
    yeaaa….I think it’s been about Jen, all along. She really is obsessed with her. And, she probably wants JTx now.

    Reply
  256. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    He is the booby prize or as Lets Make a Deal says you’ve been Zonked..

    Reply
  257. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:12 pm

    @joanne:
    She does! And after reading Kate’s post…..it got me to thinking…maybe Jen/JTx is a set-up, to see if joLIE will take the bait and do it again? I know, it sounds a little ‘out there’, but sometimes you’ve got to fight fire with fire ;) and if that means giving someone enough rope to hang themselves….then that’s what it means.

    Reply
  258. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol: that would be fun to watch.
    2 more kids came out to testify against Sandusky today. I wish those brave men the best. I put Jolie and Sandusky together because they both misused their charties for their own benefit.

    Reply
  259. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    @joanne:
    I’m with you on that! They also say stupid things, when being interviewed, and can’t see how out of touch with reality that they are!!!!!!!

    Reply
  260. Guest1 said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    @checkmate:
    Yes, you are right, I would love to see Brad and Jen back together, but just long enough for her to kick him in the crotch.

    Reply
  261. Patty Anne said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    That entire mess with Sandusky makes me livid. I hope those men who came forward to tell what was done to them by Sandusky as children get the support of the community as they deserve. I’m sick to death of seeing pervs being honored and idolized because they are good at one thing legal.@joanne:

    Reply
  262. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    stupid….”‘If I say “No, I’m not attracted to boys” that’s not the truth because I’m attracted to young people- boys, girls.”

    stupid….about privately musing with bradley about the death penalty…”But it’s fun. It’s a fun debate, you know? “

    Reply
  263. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    @Guest1:
    :P

    Reply
  264. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    @checkmate:
    Well maybe many do want him back together, not me. Some of what may have appeared to be enthusiam for a reunion, may have been more of an enthusiam for f/u to AJ.

    Reply
  265. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:41 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Especially at dinner :grin: Cuz we all know that death makes for some great dinner time chatter. (As IF the bitch eats).

    Reply
  266. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    @checkmate. I don’t want them to get together either. Jolie and Pitt deserve each other and they owe those six kids they drag around.

    Reply
  267. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:46 pm

    @rushdog:
    :) I would LOVE to see joLIE get knocked off her high horse.

    Reply
  268. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:47 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I’m just hoping things don’t get swept under the rug. I am also hoping Mr. Braddock gets satisfaction.

    Reply
  269. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:53 pm

    I just hope that Brad gets out of this alive. That will be a win.

    Reply
  270. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    @rushdog:
    i agree. i was once excited to hear of an impending split for that reason, jolie selling movie tickets and baby pictures and exploited refugees on the merit/relevancy of her own flat ass.
    now, i want dandeho to stand the test of time and prove everyone with a thinking brain wrong. dandeho really have been in sweet lurve for years and they really do raise those kids and make them feel some security by kissing in front of them and she really feels “like I’m needed at home as a mom.”

    Reply
  271. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    and that white horse is higheeeeeeeee!

    Reply
  272. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    i’ll pick my teeth with my pinkie and she can eat that.

    Reply
  273. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Pitt is vyying for the gold man. That is making him a loser. The media is trying to convince us his and her crappy movies are a success They are trying to convince us hot hot and sexy they are. I have eyes and i see a girlish man and a boney hag being idolized for being narcisisstic overacting fakers.

    Reply
  274. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    @joanne:
    ‘I have eyes and i see a girlish man and a boney hag being idolized for being narcisisstic overacting fakers.’

    right on!

    Reply
  275. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    Does anyone see Clooney or DiCaprio everywhere on the net? Everywhere you go there is a story about the holiday rape movie. She is unqualified to make this movie, she was always over indulged not being torn apart by war. Why anyone would want a gold man for someones elses suffering and using someone elses words as her own is beyond me.

    Reply
  276. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:12 pm

    @joanne:
    He’s playing to the wrong crowd then ;) cuz we don’t vote, his peers do, and I doubt they will vote for him as long as he’s tied to joLIE. BTW, did anyone get a pic of joLIE with James? ;)

    Reply
  277. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    haha, it seems as if james was relegated to the margins with his dressed fish.

    Reply
  278. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    @joanne:
    …and only she (and maybe bradley) knows how ferociously fake she REALLY is, she sleeps with that knowledge every night and looks it in the face every morning. we are seeing the tip of the iceberg.

    Reply
  279. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:23 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    So is she! :)

    Reply
  280. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    You have good eyesight ;)

    Reply
  281. rushdog said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:28 pm

    And back to Ian’s clue….

    The more I think about this, and considering Kate’s take on this, I now think the clue is about her, she’s the focus and he’s a bit player. The pic w/the two sides to the couple (private/public) is relevant because it ties into her black to red. So am now guessing “near the end” refers to her and not the end of the couple. Despite public appearances, she’s a mess and and fearing she’ll lose everything. Whether this is only a reaction to the lawsuit or more that’s not public, who knows. What a way to live. Let there always be drama.

    Reply
  282. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 4:30 pm

    @joanne:
    I agree with you, that she is unqualified to tell this story. It’s not her story to tell. She won’t even tell her own story truthfully. She is smug/pretentious, and she’s using this for shock value, just like she used to do with her vials of blood, and “we just had sex in the limo” talk. Her father is right about her, he knows how her mind works, and it frightens him….I think it frightens Brad too.

    Reply
  283. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    Hi UTC,

    I am more inclined to believe that JTx would not be an objection of Jolie’s affection from a business perspective and based on theory that she most likely has a mistress hidden away or here and there. We can not possibly know the truth behind all circumstances of all of the participants, but we do know that all are prone to promoting their projects and images based on the knowledge that has been afforded to us over time, and that is directed by the publicists-handlers to a degree, regardless of how they protest. Theories are not based on gossip related research on message boards (possibly hypothesis is) but rather the character of each that has been revealed over a decade through interviews, and through the relations they have with others, including basic friendships. Comments made by those who know them personally, met them , people who work for them or know their families, all in the end give a more clear picture of who these people really are underneath all the airbrushing.

    People also have a tendency to reflect who they spend time time with.Jen with CC, then Chelsea, although she has the same basic nature. Always sweet, considerate, just a party girl.Still can see the influence though.She has become more bold. Brad seems to change even with his business colleagues.Fincher seems to have some influence on him. ;) Someone, around a few years back told Angelina, stop wearing jeans, and always wear heels and dress as a diplomat. You need to look the part all the time. Yes, she use to wear jeans, many photos to prove that . Her comments about her not favoring jeans has more to do with changing her image to be where her people need it to be, where she wants it to be, than her trying to put Jennifer down for being carefree, stylish and the girl next door. jmho on that. I think she is self-driven and cares more about ruling her own universe and has little respect for actors in general, and believes she is better and above that. She has that “I can do anything, achieve anything attitude” and always has had it, and began exercising that back when she jumped in to get “Beyond Borders” made. That was the end of the old Angelina and the beginning of the one she is marketing now. I would put her ego right next to Obama’s.

    I really doubt anyone enters into the equation (with Jolie)unless it is going to end with success for her in a respected and successful role, regardless of what it may be. Next on her list is Afghanistan. That comment sums it up, doesn’t it? I wonder what the American people think of that , the ones who have sons and daughters over there at the moment, the ones who have died and been buried, the ones who do believe in Thanksgiving and giving Thanks to the God whom they feel has helped them through their grief and held the hands of their loved ones who served with honor. I hope whatever she is going after, it is them. I doubt very much though that American has any weight at all with Angelina, she considers herself a Internationalist at this point. That said, I believe the majority of the country is not tuned into any of them anymore, the Friends days are over, the bad economy takes precedence over fairy tales as it should. There are no King and Queens of Hollywood , no Will and Kates, no fairy tales, except of Santa of course. Poor Brad, he thinks Santa is a lie! LOL What on earth did his parents do to him? Merry Christmas!

    Reply
  284. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 5:53 pm

    Rush, look at the first comment-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl5aqpwToPE

    Some people starve themselves to become happy and overcome body dysmorphia, and sexy, happy thinspo is made for them.

    Others, like me, starve ourselves to become fragile and protectworthy, and emaciated thinspo like this works far better for us than sexy thinspo.

    Thank you, FindingPerfect, for understanding that not all thinspo viewers want to get a “fabulous figure” and a “bikini body”, and tapping into the niche market of people who want to look scary rather than good.

    daughterofdagon 3 months ago 3

    Although I believe the site is to help not encourage.

    Reply
  285. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    Poor Zahara,you know someone is going to send Ricky the horse jokes, yes? Maddox will probably get a few too with that hand holding, and Pax the Punk Rocker. Geez for a bright girl she is stupid.

    Reply
  286. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    siska…janiston sighting…cant see a thing of her face but….
    http://www.x17online.com/celebrities/guess_who/jennifer_aniston_facial_sexy_face_actress_120711.php

    Reply
  287. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:10 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Did you read the comments? Those loons aren’t so bright. I love facials.

    Reply
  288. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:15 pm

    a couple months ago, pregnant sinead oconnor was claiming a severe dry spell (’living as a nun’) on her blog, begging for candidates to bang. she’s now about to have that baby and tomorrow, marry her ‘beloved boyfriend’ who is not the father. but the father is described as her ‘partner’. wth? she’s a tad mental anyway.

    Reply
  289. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:18 pm

    @joanne:
    yes i did. x17 must be a nest of loons. morons.

    Reply
  290. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:28 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate :) Nice to see you. joLIE does think very highly of herself, and I would agree that her ego is right next to Obama’s. So what do you think joLIE’s end game is? What does she really want to be when she grows up? ;) She can’t go on living this lie forever, even she will run out of steam, eventually. Her true colors will shine through, it’s just the nature of the beast.

    Reply
  291. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:34 pm

    @joanne:
    I did, after you mentioned it…dayum, they do sound like morons. (but probably just one moron) ;)

    Reply
  292. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:36 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    one big fat moron whose immense girth spans several IPs.

    Reply
  293. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:40 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    You have a great way with words ;) and you’re a techy!

    Reply
  294. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:41 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    :lol: I suspected one person posted a few remarks. poor soul.

    Reply
  295. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:47 pm

    actually, i think u r spot on, that the anon posts are all one loon. bam bam bam
    @Up the Coast:

    Reply
  296. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:52 pm

    @joanne:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C8l03Nwod8&feature=related

    Reply
  297. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 7:58 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    :lol: Now I am going to associate the loons with Ursula.

    Reply
  298. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    @joanne:
    i know!! ursula used to be just ursula. but since finding out about seahag jolie, when i see ursula, i see the ultimate loon for jolie, spells and all.

    Reply
  299. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    :cry: the symbolism in Disney flicks, gives me the chills :cry:

    Reply
  300. janindisguise said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:09 pm

    Been over reading on several sites about the memo advertising for subcontractors for the existing FEMA camps in our land, if anyone has heard of that. I am not an alarmist nor do I think this is off topic, because after all, AJ is a member of the CFR (not our friend). I am very concerned.

    Reply
  301. janindisguise said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:12 pm

    Gotta go see about my mom.

    Reply
  302. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    they know all about the dark side.
    btw, when i bought the kids the VHS tape when it came out. i got to looking at the drawing of the castle, there were penises all over it. that led me to finding out about a couple other things i didnt notice in the kidz flick.

    Reply
  303. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    I saw those penises too. Disney has been using sublimation for a long time.

    Reply
  304. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    @janindisguise:
    yes i read about that this morning. they are getting them ready in every state. but they don’t exist. ;) i don’t think the camps are for errant mexicans either. they get a free pass, and sometimes free education and health care…etc.

    they passed that nice law the other day too. “By the end of next week, the US government very likely will have the power to lock up US citizens for life at Guantanamo Bay or other military prisons — without charge and without trial. This means that, in the near future, a controversial Twitter post, attending a peaceful protest, or publishing an anti-Congress critique or anti-TSA rant on Google+ could land you “indefinite detention” for life, in the wording of the bill. No access to a lawyer, no access to trial. Yes, you read that right. This would target American citizens, on American soil. Military personnel would be able to come into your house like something out of a Tom Clancy novel and chopper your innocent self down to Guantanamo Bay for life.”

    Reply
  305. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:36 pm

    @joanne:
    jeez, donald duck called daffy duck the ‘n’ word!

    Reply
  306. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:41 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Who knows, other than that 21 gun salute that Josephine Baker was honored with.. ;)

    Reply
  307. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    @janindisguise:
    Thanks for the link…

    Reply
  308. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:53 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    I don’t appreciate how they turn our children into mindless consumers, as it is, but when they entice them with that subliminal shit….that’s just wrong!!!

    Reply
  309. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    “After the New York premiere of her powerful directorial debut, “In the Land of Blood and Honey,” Angelina Jolie, her partner Brad Pitt and Pitt’s parents led a VIP crowd — including Julian Schnabel, Jason Lee…”

    what the hell was earl hickey doing at her party???? he’s pissed me off now. i know he is a scientologist and all but come on….!

    http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/jolie_keeps_it_in_the_family_blmssKI2JG44aSm28ofwBL#ixzz1ftrjJry3

    Reply
  310. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 8:57 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    we are learning the cold hard fact that protected pedos are everywhere.

    Reply
  311. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    @Kate:
    Or a standing ovation at Carnegie Hall? :) She’s got 6 more kids to adopt tho :( and 6 more nannies to hire.

    Reply
  312. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:16 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Huh? wtheck? VIP? They just grab random people, since they don’t have any real friends, in order to create a party :roll: COS is a cult….and so is joLIE ;) Jason must have felt right at home.

    Reply
  313. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:18 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    I’m afraid you’re right :cry:

    Reply
  314. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:26 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    there was a story online today that tom cruise’s people did just that in india last weekend. hired people for 3 dollars and a meal to act like excited fans at the airport. paramount denies it. what else are they going to say?

    Reply
  315. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    see you all tmrw. have a nice evening.

    Reply
  316. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Of course they deny it, but they do it all the time. See you tomorrow!

    Reply
  317. joanne said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:36 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Jason Lee is a VIP? I never heard of the other person.

    Reply
  318. Kate said on December 7th, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Did you read that complete fantasy conception that KP discussed recently in her Yes article. I was embarassed for her, my gosh, no shame at all. How she sat there and gave that interview with a straight face is amazing. I know her family so I do not want to rant on her after what they have had to deal with, but honestly Kelly ? Johnny was probably in a bar somewhere chilling or crying. She almost made Jolie sound normal with her silly mommy and daddy kiss routine. Curious, did any of your kids get all warm and fuzzy and secure with that or they more like, ewwwww. lol how many school age children really like to watch parents pucker up, except on the Hallmark Channel under the mistletoe? She clearly does not know how a family interacts or she would not say these things and KP , jumping for glee, trying, really? What cults and money and fame will do to a person. Sad.

    Reply
  319. Up the Coast said on December 7th, 2011 at 10:24 pm

    @Kate:
    I’ll have to look it up, but I did read a recent article where she talked about losing 39 lbs of baby weight on that organic diet program that Kirstie is pushing now. I know what you mean though, it is over the top. I would say, she might be on something to elevate her mood, but we know that can’t be it. It’s very “Stepford Wifish” haha, that’s not a word, is it?

    Reply
  320. Guest2 said on December 7th, 2011 at 10:37 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Ha, more kiddos for us to ask “who’s your daddy”. Love it.

    Reply
  321. Guest2 said on December 7th, 2011 at 10:47 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Good night.

    Reply
  322. Glynis said on December 7th, 2011 at 11:27 pm

    http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/06/41973.htm

    You can click on Braddock’s lawsuit here.

    Reply
  323. janindisguise said on December 8th, 2011 at 9:36 am

    @joanne:
    RE: sublimation of Disney. Did you ever see Fantasia? Saw it in the theatre a long, long time ago. Gathered everyone up and left and they WANTED to leave as well. At the time we just thought it was extremely boring. It’s also full of “stuff”.

    SRW said we are learning the cold hard fact that protected pedos are everywhere. Yepp. Goes to the top. Your comment reminds me of that Sears appliance commercial: “Better bring your umbrellas cause it’s raining cold hard facts up in here.” Love that.

    Have a Jesus filled day everyone and
    Shalom.

    Reply
  324. janindisguise said on December 8th, 2011 at 10:10 am

    My interpretation of the above clues are probably not what is called for, you know – such as “the end is near”.

    I have been thinking lately about AJ and how I wonder if the AJ that we see now is the same as the real AJ. How does one make a person’s face actually longer? Why are there what resembles gills in a pic of her on her right side just below/behind the ears? Why is she so veiny? I was looking at her pictures as she transitioned, so to speak, and it looks like to me a totally different person and I have taken plastic surgery into consideration. Why are people at FF questioning this as well? Why does BP look so forelorn? Why are his pictures looking like someone else’s face in some pics? Who’s foolin who here? Just wondering.

    Maybe I’ve been reading too much on hybrids lately?>?

    Reply
  325. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 8th, 2011 at 10:17 am

    @joanne:
    gmorning joanne. julian schnabel is a director. he did ‘basquiat’ and ‘before night falls’. jason lee was a VIP that nite. he must need the money.

    Reply
  326. Guest2 said on December 8th, 2011 at 10:38 am

    @janindisguise:
    Boy, I know what you mean about their faces. They look like totally different people from their original selves. I think it is a combination of much surgery and attitude for both. I notice it more in brad because I’ve never really followed jolie in any way until recently. They’ve both started to believe their own press and have become haughty and superior to everyone and it shows in their demeanor. I remember brad in interviews used to be charming and funny, joking around with clooney (and he was good looking). Now he looks awful and sounds like an idiot for lack of a better word, probably because he’s trying to be an intellectual artist but isn’t smart enough to pull it off. I think they are still the real aj/bp but greatly changed, at least brad. Angie’s maybe the same as she’s always been but like a snake she keeps shedding her skin and growing a new one but inside I don’t think anything’s changed except that she feels more superior than ever. jmo. bbl.

    Reply
  327. Jaded said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:00 am

    A reply to Guest2: Thanks for clearing that up. I misread and misunderstood as usual.

    A question to all: Is anyone else having trouble accessing the FF site? Maybe it’s just me.

    Reply
  328. sinker said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:02 am

    i would like to re-iterate a previous comment and see what you guys think: “the end is near” – i am wondering if this has to do with AJ’s health. Opiates (incl. methadone) take a toll on the body. Liver, digestive system esp. Past history of drug abuse, “lovers in hotel rooms”, and the tattoos — she is high on the list of risk behaviours for hepC.

    Reply
  329. Guest2 said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:07 am

    @sinker:
    It’s possible. It might explain here emaciated appearance and everyone bending over backwards to accommodate her, i.e., brad/family. I hope it’s not that.

    Reply
  330. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:15 am

    hi jaded. i just tried FF. worked for me.

    Reply
  331. Jaded said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:16 am

    “The end is near” refers to a relationship (too pathological to call it that) Pitt had with some one else (not Aniston, could be several other individuals).

    Reply
  332. Jaded said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:17 am

    @selfffrighteouswhore:

    Thanks, SRW.

    Reply
  333. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:26 am

    @janindisguise:
    hi jan. speaking of commercials, i saw one last weekend for what i cant remember, maybe insurance?…anyway, the setting was a checkpoint manned by a man in black uniform and wearing sunglasses. he lowers his shades in menacing sort of way…the commercial then goes on to mention their ‘checklist’ to keep things in order, i guess. oh boy! here it comes.

    Reply
  334. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:29 am

    @Jaded:
    u r welcome jaded.

    everyone have a nice day. i’m going to be gone for a few days. i might get to check in tho.

    Reply
  335. sinker said on December 8th, 2011 at 12:32 pm

    @Guest2:
    i hope it is not her health as well, but her recent appearance caused me to go there. my other thought: i have always believed pitt has stayed with “the brand” thus far because of the safety of the kids. if he were to get primary custody, i think he would get out, but she would have to mess up huge for that to happen. maybe something has happened.

    Reply
  336. Up the Coast said on December 8th, 2011 at 1:22 pm

    @sinker:
    The Enquirer is saying that 95 lb Ange had an accidental drug overdose…whether it’s true, or not, she does look high alot of the time. Right now, she’s dragging Brad and the kids around NYC and she’s wearing her manic Joker face, while the rest of them look like they are just frikken over this sh*t. WHEN will someone, with some sense, step in and say ENOUGH!!??? Are they letting her do it because she’s in complete control of the kids? Or because the ‘end is near’ and they know it won’t go on forever? Or…because they are giving her enough rope to hang herself??? ;) hmmm.

    Reply
  337. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    @Jaded:
    Can you elaborate further on “the end is near” relating to a former relationship of BP?

    Reply
  338. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    Mulling things over as I was driving…I was thinking about the tag also. Of course there are songs titled “the end is near” as we should have known with Ian’s tendency to bring music into the clues!!! The names of the bands (on the first two search pages) with a song titled “the end is near”

    The Confession
    Embrace
    UnderOath
    The Fiery Furnance
    Unseen

    Search “the end is near lyrics” if you want to read them. I don’t want to clog the thread with all those lyrics. Most are ominous about the end of a couple, the world or a situation.

    Reply
  339. Up the Coast said on December 8th, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    @rushdog:
    What about: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6E2hYDIFDIU

    Reply
  340. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    Again, I think Ian’s post is about what’s going on with her in particular to the early event with his mother on 12/5. Mood swings, panic mode, cohesive yet heavily drugged, faulty image, PR walks, decorated w/color & flavor for damage control (probably includes both his parents and now the toy store outing).

    The tag, to me, seems to suggest there’s something more. A lawsuit alone, at this stage, is not going to signal the end of anything (at least I don’t think it does). I’m wondering if Ian knows there’s more out there to reveal…if the lawsuit is just the beginning?

    Reply
  341. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I was just going by song titles but, yes, that phrase is in My Way. Let’s not bring Frank into this!!! :)

    Reply
  342. liv4 said on December 8th, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    @rushdog:
    I wonder if it is the end of her lies. Star is reporting she had a drug overdose which she and BP are attempting to hide. That might have been the event with “irreparable damage”. And think about her screenplay, first written when she had the flu and had to stay away from her children in a “large white room” and then it was when the kids were around but mostly at her daughter’s art class. I don’t see this being the end of a relationship because most people know there is no relationship. If you read other sites, one of which is Lamey, she is even backing down on the great love affair. I notice she talks of them almost separately now.

    Reply
  343. Patty Anne said on December 8th, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    Additionally, we have learned over the last couple of years that FEMA has requisitioned manufacturers for 140 Million Packets of Food, Blankets, and Body Bags, while the U.S. military is Actively War Gaming ‘Large Scale Economic Breakdown’ and ‘Civil Unrest’ which includes training for over 20,000 US military personnel for contingencies that may include riots and/or mass detentions.

    While mainstream media will not report this, and most of the population will either ignore it or chalk it off as being once again blown out of proportion by the alternative news sphere, the evidence is right in front of us – it is overwhelming and very compelling.

    Our government is, without a doubt, preparing for an event(s) that will likely result in the mass detentions of tens of thousands of individuals across the entire United States.

    Wow, this is unbelievable.@janindisguise:

    Reply
  344. liv4 said on December 8th, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    And this is JMO but I think the average person’s tolerance for BS is getting lower all the time. I am an avid reader. It seems to be people are disgusted with the economy, the President, the lack of decent behavior on the part of celebs (can anyone say American Airlines and AB?). If the time is right for anything to catch up with all these lies and what HW gets away with, the time is now.

    Reply
  345. Up the Coast said on December 8th, 2011 at 3:11 pm

    @liv4:
    I agree, whole heartedly, about our tolerance for BS. IMO, that is one of the reasons for those 20,000 troops that Patty is talking about :( The sheeple have been led to slaughter, but at the last minute…some of them are smelling blood. The shit is going to hit the fan, I hope everyone has a plan.

    Reply
  346. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 3:31 pm

    @liv4:
    Yeah, I wondered about the screenplay/flu scenario possibly being back in February. Lainey seems to be shrugging off the lawsuit suggesting that AJ gets accused of so much. That couple being stuck together if lies are revealed would be solid gold.

    Reply
  347. Tetta said on December 8th, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    @rushdog:
    Now I interupt the discussion about the economy ( the whole Europe is also waiting for the big crash). But we don´t have to involve Frank Sinatra in the melody “My way”. Let´s pretend we never had heard him singing the song. Paul Anka has written the lyrics and the melody is from France. I think the lyrics suits AJ very much. She doesn´t see her mistakes:” regrets, I have a few, but then again, to few to mention “. It´s only AJ who can say it in that way compared to all stupid things she has done.

    Reply
  348. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    Another f&cking shooter at Virginia Tech! Will the madness ever end?

    Reply
  349. Armitage said on December 8th, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    @liv4:
    Rushdog, I’ve had more thoughts on the clues too. Could be way off – so many interpretations are possible, but here goes on a few of them:

    going from black to red – Jolie changing her bets (colours on a roulette wheel), going from acting to writing/directing, gambling on a change of career. Mood swings fits too – Ian could intend more than one meaning on these things?

    yelling at the moon – ok, this is a very long shot (!) – Jolie is frustrated/jealous of the success of the Twilight franchise ( New Moon) and the lack of interest in her or any fans from the teen market – she was saying teenagers would relate to her love/rape movie at her premier wasn’t she? Two of the cartoons could be Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart (wearing glasses) – yes I know that’s a long stretch! It can also be Buzz Aldrin – he has said “I don’t believe in barriers…because I always break them” – Jolie doesn’t let anything or anyone ( Braddock) stand in her way – and in the 30 Rock sketch, “I see you! I see what you’re doing! You have no business here! Return to the night! Don’t you know it’s day?” – this could be Jolie saying to Braddock I know you’re trying to de-rail me, go back in the shadows, don’t bring to light my deceptions.

    how much can can be garnished – unless Ian repeated “can” by mistake, “can” could indicate “film in the can” – how much superficial tinkering (garnishing) can be pointed to as showing material differences between her film and Braddock’s book in order to deflect the plagiarism charge?

    slippery butta side gloves – these are gloves sold by an American called Aaron who melds pucks onto gloves by hand and very securely

    whisky for the holy ghost – the album cover features a bible, a bottle of whisky and a crowded ashtray -clearly these are Brad’s vices and his conflict with religion. The album is described as sounding “like a condemned man’s dying prayer” and the cover “captures the intense desperation of the music,” while the lyrics are “dense with the metaphors of death and drink.”

    Reply
  350. joanne said on December 8th, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    goosd afternoon. Thanks. I expected names like Clint Eastwood, Clinton. Rice and all her other friends who helped her with this travesty.

    Reply
  351. Armitage said on December 8th, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    oops, posted above before finishing -

    slippery butta side gloves contd. – hand cut pucks stuck onto gloves that save you the trouble of buying the parts and doing the job yourself. Jolie got a ghost writer who heavily “borrowed” from Braddock’s book and possibly a director to do the job she was incapable of or too lazy to do herself.

    Reply
  352. joanne said on December 8th, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    I am hoping it is the end of their hold in the media.

    Reply
  353. joanne said on December 8th, 2011 at 4:28 pm

    @rushdog:
    …and Sandusky is out on bail.

    Reply
  354. janindisguise said on December 8th, 2011 at 4:39 pm

    @joanne:
    Wow. Wonder how that guy is staying alive while out on bail? If this goes as high up as I feel like it does, he’s in real danger. (I know. I know. Makes everyone sad.) Just sayin’. He’s got sooo many victims and fams out there.

    Reply
  355. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 4:44 pm

    @liv4:
    Star Mag – 911 call – unconcious/not breathing. So if they say there’s a 911 call wouldn’t there have to be one?

    2/12/11 – IUC Exclusive – Breakdown Clue #2
    Cinnamon dolce latte! Sleep apnea.

    well, well, well….

    Reply
  356. sinker said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:02 pm

    http://icydk.com/2011/12/08/angelina-jolie-on-brad-pitt-im-very-grateful-to-have-such-a-loving-family-and-i-wouldnt-have-that-without-him/

    What is the HELL is the deal with these pictures of her making faces??
    This woman NEVER shows a sense of humor, ever. Not even in PR for Kung Fu Panda, or other “light hearted” movies she makes, yet she makes a film about war and rape and these are the pictures she approves for release??????

    Reply
  357. Patty Anne said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    and in the 30 Rock sketch, “I see you! I see what you’re doing! You have no business here! Return to the night! Don’t you know it’s day?” You could be on to something with the Twilight series here. Vampires don’t come out during day, only at night.@Armitage:

    Reply
  358. Patty Anne said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    In a few of those Marie Claire photos that I saw you see she is holding the camera control on a “leash” in order to indicate she is taking some of these photos herself. A subliminal way to imprint on the viewer that she took that series of “making faces” , aka, playful photos. Just another LIE.@sinker:

    Reply
  359. Patty Anne said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:17 pm

    No wonder so many celebs have break-downs. It must be difficult after so many years to recognize fact from fiction.

    Reply
  360. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:17 pm

    Long time y’all – how are you all doing? Can I just ask is it just me who can’t get on FF at the momnet or is the site down? I am wondering whether this has anything to do with me pointing out that Knox is the spitting image of James McAvoy and Viv of JLM and I think they were both sperm donors for the children she has in a lesbian relationship with Holly Goline. Or could it jut be a glitch? LOL

    Reply
  361. sinker said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:28 pm

    Keane – i am able to get to FF

    Reply
  362. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:37 pm

    @sinker:

    I get this error message when I click on it:

    Fatal error: Call to undefined function mb_internal_encoding() in /data/sites/_LIVE_/_code-library/Fam/Service/Geo/Maxmind.php on line 898

    I’ve also been getting a lot of virus warnings lately (have had a virus before which I think came from that site) so think they must have done something again – will have to post from work until it’s fixed!

    Reply
  363. Armitage said on December 8th, 2011 at 5:43 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    So disappointed to hear Jason Lee is a scientologist – apparently he called his son “Pilot Inspektor”, too! What a tosser! Don’t know what he was doing there – rent a crowd?! Julian Schnabel is a bit more impressive, he is an artist as well as a director and his film The Diving Bell and the Butterfly was good. Interestingly, he directed that film in French (having learnt the language in a month) – ring any bells with Jolie and her talent for foreign language direction?! Another parallel – he also got lots of criticism for being controversial and out of his depth for tackling the Israeli/ Palestinian situation in his film Miral. He wasn’t accused of stealing his script, though! More similarities with Jolie are that he’s said to have a monstrous ego, his art is imitative and overrated, he’s self – aggrandising and an awful name dropper. Perhaps they share an agent/ some favour was called in by someone working on the film/Brad bought some of his paintings as a bribe!

    Reply
  364. Armitage said on December 8th, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    @sinker:
    I saw her in “Life or Something Like It” today ( I know, sucker for punishment!) I like to watch her efforts from time to time, just in case there is a film she’s appeared in which has some merit. It’s billed as a Rom-Com – what a laugh! I didn’t laugh, by the way. Jolie tried her hardest to be kooky and adorable and wear a Marilyn Monroe platinum blonde wig convincingly, but it was a major fail. She was alright at being a self – obsessed, calculating bitch, but that came naturally, and she was ok at showing vulnerability and sadness, but goofy – no – and sense of humour- forget it.
    Maybe she is throwing anything and everything out there in terms of a new image or direction and hoping that something will stick.

    Reply
  365. Armitage said on December 8th, 2011 at 6:19 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    You never know! Wish Ian would give us a comment or two to help us stay on track.

    Reply
  366. WCKitty said on December 8th, 2011 at 6:24 pm

    @sinker:
    Didn’t Jen do some of those same facial shots recently?

    Reply
  367. Armitage said on December 8th, 2011 at 6:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    So she can add photographer as well as writer, director and plagiarist to that resume of hers.

    Reply
  368. Dream said on December 8th, 2011 at 6:26 pm

    Armitage thats the best take on the red to black yet to me. if ian meant polar opposites why not black to white? ofcourse it could mean several things but i think the gambling thing is one of them.

    Reply
  369. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    @Dream:
    @Armitage:
    On the black to red…gambling would be a good guess. Red seemed to match with the angry side of a mood swing. Maybe gambling in the sense that she/they/whoever thought they wouldn’t get caught.

    Going to a Christmas dinner tonight. See you all tomorrow!

    Reply
  370. Patty Anne said on December 8th, 2011 at 6:42 pm

    Yes she did….it was in those photos of her with Justin taken on the rooftop of their appartment in NYC.@WCKitty:

    Reply
  371. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 7:27 pm

    @Armitage:
    Changed my guess again (having way too much fun with this one!!). Thanks for your thoughts and everyone else too. I just had to come back one more time tonight/can’t leave it alone. Really love it when we can all work together to (possibly) solve one of these clues. No cooking or driving this time, just washed a dish and and there was a lightbulb thanks to the gambling suggestion.

    I didn’t notice the “can can” before so either it’s a type o or it’s the dance?

    I’m going with the 30 R. Mother’s Day episode on “yelling at the moon.”

    The clue may be attached somewhat to the lawsuit (maybe just the timing), but I think it might have more to do with the Star mag cover since this was posted 3 days ago. How about this solution:

    Emaciated thinspo – HER
    going from black to red – GAMBLING
    yelling at the moon – MOTHERHOOD
    whisky for the holy ghost – HEAVY DRUG USE
    deprivation amblyopia – FALSE IMAGE
    sauntering with thoreau – WALKING THE HOLY LAND (humanitarian)
    how much can can be garnished – WITHHELD TO (dance Ang dance)
    slippery butta side gloves!!!!! – CONTROL THE RIDE (image)

    photo pic: either about her or the relationship- 2 sides public/private
    scroll: yelling at the moon – in a panic (from sweeny todd)

    tag: the end is near (the truth is coming out)

    Reply
  372. rushdog said on December 8th, 2011 at 7:28 pm

    Ian, are you a part of making Ang dance?

    Reply
  373. Dream said on December 8th, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    wow rush sounds good. ty for the thoughts.

    Reply
  374. WCKitty said on December 8th, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Thank you! Like many others here, I am really busy and have to read through the comments really quick. I wish this was taking place at a slower time of the year! :) I raced through FF and I see that the “she is so skinny because she can’t eat because of the starving children” excuse is out again. Never mind that the rest of their living conditions doesn’t impact the other areas of her life!
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=305651

    There is also a thread dealing with how she has given copies of her copied film to some politicians to watch and give feedback on. Like others have stated, “I’m glad she thinks that they have the time with all else going on in the country/world!”
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=305641

    If this has already been posted please accept my apologies! :)

    Reply
  375. Up the Coast said on December 8th, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    @janindisguise:
    I had that same thought today :( WHY is this POS still walking around?????? He’s got 50 counts against him now!!! What’s the cut-off? 51? geeeeeeeeeez.

    Reply
  376. Up the Coast said on December 8th, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    @Armitage:
    Pilot Inspektor? wtheck.

    Reply
  377. Guest2 said on December 8th, 2011 at 9:38 pm

    href=”#comment-126653″>@rushdog:
    Thanks, Rush and Armitage and all the rest for your thoughts on these clues. I think you’ve got it with the end is near meaning the truth is coming out. This makes more sense to me than a breakup. I don’t think she’d be calling brad her family in interviews and his parents coming out to support her and saying they’re proud of her if they were planning to split. Something is keeping them together, either the kids or something we don’t know about yet (or it’s been hinted and we haven’t figured it out!). Whatever happened with the gun smuggling situation in Hungary? I guess it just quietly went away.

    Reply
  378. Patty Anne said on December 8th, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    Black to red is also a financial term. In the black means profitable while in the red means in debt.@rushdog:

    Reply
  379. Up the Coast said on December 8th, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    That’s how I thought of black to red, as a financial term.

    Reply
  380. Guest2 said on December 8th, 2011 at 10:06 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Maybe it means they have financial problems and that is why they keep the brand going. But Kate has said a few times that they have plenty of money. Brad’s filmed 3 movies in the past year and a half and he commands a high salary so I’m inclined to think she is right. Angie hasn’t worked since the Tourist except for the movie she directed and her salary wasn’t that much.

    Reply
  381. Patty Anne said on December 8th, 2011 at 11:07 pm

    That could be true but how liquid are their funds? or are they tied up in some of these projects? and the trust they put the baby photo moneys into? They take advantage of tax breaks as charity funds but they also used that money to lease (buy) Chateau Miraval and who knows what else. Could they be in a position of having to prove the money that should be somewhere IS actually there? Just speculating actually.@Guest2:

    Reply
  382. Stella said on December 9th, 2011 at 1:18 am

    When Angelina Jolie is asked questions about the issues the Bosnians and Herzegovina’s faced during war she replied that she was amazed by the “lack of conversation” the world was having globally.

    What exactly is her global solution to displaced people of ethic cleansing?

    This has gone on since the beginning of time covering many countries and still there is no solution in sight to this long-term issue. Tyrants and dictators will continue as long as the human race continues to fight religious beliefs and their land rights.

    The people whom have suffered need this to be documented so it never happens again, which is an understandable and proper stance to have. Ms. Jolie seems to have this idea that government funds will help these situations and is looking for global aid to step in from pervious interviews she has been documented in.

    Today Jolie would like to have politicians see her movie too : http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/awaiting_pols_reviews_T3YEXYFhWqynqJQZrxyQuN – ixzz1fwS5BMeW.

    This is all well and good, but we need to create jobs and fix our global economy first before we can help others. Not everyone is living privileged lives. There were 10 million people around the globe who are classified as U.S.-dollar millionaires http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millionaire and about 1.7 billion people are estimated to live in absolute poverty today http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/, according to Wikipedia . Many more people are struggling to hold on to their homes worldwide as I write this today.

    Ms. Jolie once said it would be silly “just to fix our own homes and not others” but where does the money come from and where does it really go once donated? My question to Ms. Jolie is “What is your solution to end the displacement plight and in this tough global economic struggle, how do we fund it?”

    Angelina Jolie wants to have a conversation about an age-old question that she has absolutely no answers to it. The purpose of this movie is for more conversation about genocide but then what do we do about it and how do we fix it for future generations?

    I’m still waiting for one of the more in-depth media outlets which she is frequenting to ask real question that merit real answers.

    I don’t think the people of Bosnia or Herzegovinian that have lived through these war atrocities really care that Ms. Jolie was wearing a brown Ralph Lauren dress on Tuesday in New York City and “could possibly” get pregnant again.

    But maybe I’m wrong…

    JMHO :D

    Reply
  383. Evil Kitty said on December 9th, 2011 at 2:29 am

    @Patty Anne:

    Maybe they have spent money from the JP Foundation or MIR. The whole MIR thing seems fishy to me with so much money donated and only a few families actually living in the houses built so far and I read on another site the homeowners actually pay for the homes. That whole charity doesn’t seem to be on the up and up, but I could be wrong of course.

    Reply
  384. Evil Kitty said on December 9th, 2011 at 2:39 am

    To everyone commenting on the black to red clue. Can it be both the gambling and the loss? So AJ gambles on moving from acting to directing and it’s a losing situation rather than a winning situation (with black being a profit and red being a loss). It’s just not working out too well for her debut with the lawsuit and past controversy surrounding the film.

    I don’t see yelling at the moon as being motherhood though. I think it means she would prefer certain things be left in the dark (secret) rather to be out in the open and exposed to the light. Could be the lawsuit and she was hoping Braddock just went away or could also be many other secrets between her and brad, secrets about drug use, management of charitable funds, the truth about her humanitarianism, adoptions, etc., etc. Also, the word lunacy comes from luna, meaning the moon, just saying :)

    Reply
  385. checkmate said on December 9th, 2011 at 2:59 am

    maybe all this speculation is going no where? after a while it is pointless. so far, jen and justin are not media whoring during the JP’s promotion. seems JA and JT are real and concentrating on their love relationship and are like, brangelina who??? i am glad that the media induced triangle is dying it’s money-driven death. there are new scandals and $ from the new crop of wannabees to fill up rags and blogs now.

    Reply
  386. Evil Kitty said on December 9th, 2011 at 3:24 am

    @checkmate:

    JMO, I don’t personally feel this clue has anything to do with Jen and Justin, but glad to know they are so real and all ;) Some of us try and figure out the clues and we don’t know if they are right or wrong, but they are interesting as is their subject matter. Even though there are many Jen fans here and I like Jen as well, I don’t necessarily see this as a Jen fan site. Ian is an investigative journalist with inside info on celebs, but if he is wrong or his sources are wrong sometimes, so be it. It’s still an interesting site, but everyone is free to say what they want and that’s what I like about it here. :)

    Reply
  387. checkmate said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:57 am

    i agree, this is not an official jen fan site, but it is overwhelmingly a jen-friendly site and a blatently angelina hate site.

    Reply
  388. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:32 am

    @Evil Kitty:
    Well said. And to the poster who said this is an angelina hate site that is wrong. There isn’t hate just frustration with the phony baloney better than the rest of you image the brand tries to shove down our throats, the self-serving humanitarian bs and the child pimping and selling of photos. We have a right to comment on that. The hate comes from the loons who come here with their filthy talk and wishing death on people. Jen has hardly been mentioned in this thread and only in conjunction with some wanting to see photos of them. jmo. I like your take on yelling at the moon. There are lots of secrets there, wish I knew more of them (maybe)!

    Reply
  389. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:33 am

    @Guest2:
    EK’s take on yelling at the moon, that is. :)

    Reply
  390. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:32 am

    @Evil Kitty:
    I don’t think your wrong. Those charity houses are expensive and ugly. They should have all been finished. Pitt taking advantage for someones sorrow. Did he open any of their large expensive homes for the refugees?

    Reply
  391. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:33 am

    @Evil Kitty:
    “could also be many other secrets between her and brad, secrets about drug use, management of charitable funds, the truth about her humanitarianism, adoptions, etc., etc. ”

    That’s what my most recent guesses mean. Adoption = motherhood.

    Reply
  392. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:38 am

    @checkmate:
    The hate is pointed at their fakness not them personally. She represents the USA in the un and I wonder do the people she visits think all americans or narcississt rich snobs who can buy anything? Its not charity if you use it to get praise and glory.

    Reply
  393. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:39 am

    The war victims have said they support her film. This played out exactly as I thought it would. This was never a “rape” movie the way people suggested or feared. The lack of response on her part since the suggestions appeared (I believe it was shortly after she annouced her intentions to direct this film back during the Salt promo tour, July ‘10) allowed them to carefully use the announcement of support in the marketing of the film at the time of it’s premiere. ‘See it never was what they accused me of’ plays into her narrative of being misunderstood. Her money buys excellent handlers.

    Reply
  394. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:40 am

    @Guest2:
    I should have read the rest of the post and I wouldn’t have posted the same thing.

    Reply
  395. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:44 am

    @rushdog:
    Maybe I should have wrote “hires excellent handlers” it’s what I mean.

    Reply
  396. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:52 am

    @joanne:
    It’s always good to know others feel the same way so glad you posted it.

    Reply
  397. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    @Patty Anne:
    I didn’t notice these comments until Joanne replied to EK. It’s interesting that MIR is also named in braddock’s lawsuit. I thought that charity was set up speifically for housing in NOLA after katrina. I would think that any contributions made by outside parties to a charity for that specific purpose shouldn’t be diverted elsewhere. As PA said this is just speculation because I don’t know the real facts yet. Why haven’t more people questioned this? Does anyone know if that rumor of Fox interviewing braddock is true?

    Reply
  398. Jaded said on December 9th, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I also got that error message yesterday. Then I googled “Angelina Jolie plagiarism”. That got me a FF thread along the lines of “getting inspiration is not plagiarism”. I clicked that and voila I was back in. It is very interesting to note that only a pro Jolie titled page showed up on the first page of the Google search.

    Reply
  399. whatever said on December 9th, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    I think it boils down to this. IF this case goes to court, and Braddock wins a judgement, that there will have to be total financial disclosure by Angelina Jolie. Will her finances be up to snuff? Will this be another breaking news story, with another actor/actresses being in trouble with the IRS, or FEDS? Will it be like Wyclef Jean and his Haiti foundation, where it shows that money from his foundation was being used to support himself, instead of what it was intended to be used for? Will it show that there was money-laundering going on between all of their foundations, Jolie-Pitt, Maddox-Jolie Pitt and MIR foundations? That income and/or money going into the various foundations, can’t be explained away, as coming from a reliable sources or may show illegal contributions and/or money going out was going to support their private lifestyle? I am wondering if “the end is near” has to do with this.

    Reply
  400. liv4 said on December 9th, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    @checkmate:
    I feel compelled to respond to your comment that this is an anti-AJ site. I used to be one of those people that glanced at tabloid covers while in line at the grocery store. At one point I thought AJ was pregnant, then not pregnant, then pregnant again (twins). Then I thought that AJ said something that totally was the polar opposite of what I had just read. It got to the point where I thought I needed to really read an article instead of just skimming it because I undoubtedly was missing something. I wasn’t. This is the nonsense that AJ expects the public to believe. All celebs are guilty to a degree, but AJ’s contradictions and actions are blatantly inappropriate and damaging, especially when she involves herself in humanitarian efforts while influencing government agencies and the public’s perception of events. To name but a few, her indiscretions (putting it mildly) have directly affected Cambodian adoption policies and have clearly distressed victims of war. Her manipulations affect more than those who choose to be part of her wold. I can’t speak for everyone, but for me this is bigger than not liking someone for inserting herself into another person’s marriage. That happens all the time unfortunately. Her true ethos was apparent when she was willing to participate in a character and career assassination of another individual so her image would not be tarnished. All that said, I was extremely pleased when last Feb. a blind about “irreparable damage” horrified the posters here as they wished that on no one.

    I agree completely that the triangle needs to end. I am sure all three have profited from it in some form or another. I have my own opinion on the JA/JTX romance, but my opinion on that is a result of the vacuous nature of Hollywood.

    Sorry for my long rant. I just want to clarify from my perspective that my dislike for AJ’s actions have nothing to do with choosing sides in a triangle (such as being anti-AJ) but how her actions affect others on a more global level.

    Reply
  401. liv4 said on December 9th, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    @whatever:
    Well said and probably the explanation for “from black to red”.

    Reply
  402. Jaded said on December 9th, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    @liv4:

    Thanks for the great post and taking a global perspective. How much more “irreparable damage” will be done?

    Reply
  403. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    @liv4:
    @checkmate:
    @rushdog:
    Very well said Liv4. I have to say that I do agree w/checkmate that this is a Jen-friendly site, much less so for Angie but I wouldn’t describe it as hate. Manner of expression varies widely here.

    To continue my comment on the war victims support of her film, a true humanitarian would have considered the feelings and horrible experiences of the victims and responded immiediately to provide clarification and alleviate their concerns about the film. No waiting for marketing value. Her response amounted to something on the order of ‘trust me’ until the promotion of the film was in full swing and the full marketing value of their support could be used. I believe this to be a valid criticism and ties into Liv4’s comment.

    She may be a humanitarian but she’s no altruist. Sadly, I don’t think the public or the media differentiate between the two. They’re too caught up in the packaging to notice the difference.

    Reply
  404. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    The reason this site seems to be Jen-friendly probably depends on that most of us have followed the triangle for a long time. The majority of us observes Angelinas way to build up her career. It isn´t always honest. She uses every thing she can as PR. From her own children to photos from the third world´s starving children. I don´t hate her, I just don´t like the way she lives. The Brand often uses Jennifer when they need attention. Brad says something about how boring she was and so on. Many of us get into a defence mode when we read this bad stuff. Jennifer doesn´t harm people or uses other to stay on top. It´s a human reaction to stand on her side when the magazines go crazy about Brad and Angelina.

    When Angelina´s movie gets out in public I hope that the people in Kroatia and Serbia think twice before they see it. They have been through a big trauma and the time hasn´t travel so far yet to heal their souls. It doesn´t need much for the horror to come up to the surface again.

    Reply
  405. Violet said on December 9th, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    @rushdog:

    I love that last sentence of your post. You’ve made a brilliant distinction between humanitarianism and altruism as they apply to Angelina.

    I just read an article in which she says she has no girlfriends, and is a homebody, (how can you be a homebody if you live in hotels?), and only talks to Brad. Add anti-social, perhaps even xenophobic, to her resume. Oy vey!

    Reply
  406. Renee said on December 9th, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    @rushdog:
    I don’t believe any “end is near”.

    They are doing relatively well for a HW couple – still out together after how many years? God knows what’s going on behind closed doors or if there is a deal motivating this togetherness, but the fact is they still go out together and making a show of things together.

    I am impressed that BPs parents were there to support AJ at her movie premier. That says alot. They have nothing to gain by putting themselves out there so to me, it says something even to a skeptic and it has to be somewhat good on some level.

    IUCs been putting out alot of riddles this past year and I know to some it is entertaining but if you look back, the clues have largely meant nothing to anyone (or alot of different things to alot of people) and seem to be threadless. This is dertainly deliberate on his part to protect himself and I can understand the need to do that.

    On the overall, BP and AJ are doing a good job pursuing a status as a HW golden couple in my view.

    Reply
  407. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 3:24 pm

    @Renee:
    I hope an “end is near” but I have no idea if there’s an end to be near. I’m just guessing on what Ian posts. Time will tell so we have to just sit, wait and see if anything pans out. I’m a little more skeptical than you on his parents attendance at the premier. His mother was also on the balcony in Venice (ridiculous pimping) and, I believe, more than once. That says a lot to me.

    I also disagree that the clues are threadless. I see connections between the various posts and there appear to be 3-4 riddle-lines, unfortunately it’s too lengthy for me to explain. Yes, they are doing a good job of pursuing the status, it’s all marketing and money.

    Reply
  408. liv4 said on December 9th, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    @rushdog:
    There seems to me to be a disproportionate amount of attention to this film debut – BP’s parents brought out, and then James and his girlfriend, and then we save “big daddy Jon” for the end. Kind of trying too hard IMO. Makes me think this new venture for AJ HAS TO WORK, just not sure of the reason WHY. Is it because of the lawsuit? Because AJ has to appear to be successful in her own right before a split? Because the brand have money invested in this? I think with the wire-tapping with NOTW confirmed, it isn’t a long-shot to conclude that was how info about a split was leaked. Too much deflection and too many contradictions. I’m not sure how the “end is near” fits either, just think it is the end maybe of the way we see them.

    Reply
  409. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 3:47 pm

    AJ is successful idiot Liv4. Continue to live your hate. Angelina you are simply the best. Suck on it fREAKS.

    Reply
  410. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    @liv4:
    Nicely said. I agree that what she says and what she does is completely out of sync, and it’s frustrating that people do not question her odd/ridiculous words or her actions. It’s great when a celebrity brings attention to a situation…but to embrace it, literally, like that child who was tied to a pole…have your photo taken, then just walk away, leaving the child tied to a pole….that, to me, is sickening and plain wrong. How could she walk away? How can people read about the bizarre way she has stereotyped her children, and not question it? Some of us, who live in the real world, can see that there is something wrong with this picture.

    Reply
  411. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    Yay…we must be doing something right :) We just got our seal of approval.

    Reply
  412. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 3:56 pm

    Tetta , FYI the people in the region, the same ones who gave Ms jolie a hard time at the start of her movie, from gossip you Haters spread are now singing her praises. Some of the ministers and the womens group are calling her movie EXCELLENT., So keep on wishing and hoping for the worst for AJ , you will never bring her down because she always comes out on top as the beautiful rose she is.

    Reply
  413. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    @Violet:
    Thanks. Wasn’t that ‘I only talk to Brad’ line used before? What is amazing is that it’s same pattern for each series of interviews whenever she has something to promote. Talks about the same personal stuff over and over and it still gets picked up and creates the same sound bites. The media is so bought, packaged and sold these days, just interested in their own self-promotion and survival. Complete sell out and I’m not just refering to the Brand. My father-in-law is rolling in his grave.

    Reply
  414. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    The people in the region, the victims themselves, who gave Ms. Jolie a hard time did so because Angelina Jolie was not open about the nature of the film. She could have ended their concerns immediately but chose not to do so.

    Reply
  415. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    They had no right to judge her on gossip from haters like you and the FF’ers, now they have eggs all over their stupid faces. She owed them Zippo, nada. End of story.

    Reply
  416. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    Politely articulating your thoughts is not “living your hate.” It’s having an opinion. Calling people names because you don’t agree is “living your hate.”

    Reply
  417. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:18 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    She owed them nothing, correct. A true, decent human being and humanitarian would have given the people of the region some consideration regardless of where they may have obtained their information. She used the people of the region in her self-promotion the same way she appears to use everyone else.

    I can acknowledge that her film is getting good reviews and that at least a select group is indicating strong support. I wrote that here a couple of hours ago. Let’s hope, for their sake, that the creation of this film came about honestly.

    Reply
  418. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    @liv4:
    Yeah, the big guns are out for the unveiling. To some extent that would be expected. But for some reason the big guns are also pulled out at other times and in rather close timing. Again, back to Venice (closely following the NOTW leak) and last July when she pimped her children out on how many family outings. I think the big guns are out for more than just this movie.

    Reply
  419. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:29 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    “now they have eggs all over their stupid faces. She owed them Zippo…” So the victims of war have stupid faces. Wow, you’re really a piece of work.

    Reply
  420. liv4 said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:31 pm

    @rushdog: Me too. Something is going down.

    Reply
  421. Lurker said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    @liv4:

    Haters are going to hate regardless of what Angelina does. You surely must realize this is a big moment for her and her family is there to support her. I feel sorry for you if yours don’t support all your moments in life. Mine came to my graduation, my nieces baptism, their first recital etc…. That’s what family does and Angie’s are no different.

    Reply
  422. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    I’m very rushed today at work so have little time. I read somewhere that she said in an interview that she has a lot of her own money invested in this movie. Did anyone else see that?

    Reply
  423. liv4 said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    I wonder why no one questions, “I wrote it in 2 days while quarantined from the children with the flu” to “I wrote it when the kids were running around, but mostly in S’s art class” to “I wrote it in a big white room”. Does any of the above even sound logical, let alone feasible? No. Well, maybe the big white room might mean something.

    Reply
  424. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    Here it is – she says she financed a large chunk of the movie. I see the loons are coming out in full force. bbl.

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/angelina-jolie-kung-fu-panda-land-blood-honey-270225

    Reply
  425. liv4 said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:56 pm

    @Lurker: I’m not making this personal against any other poster or their opinion. I am not going to defend myself or my family because you make a thinly-veiled insult. As I stated above, I did not randomly choose a celeb to like or dislike, and I made it very clear that I do not like the actions of someone, not the person. Do with it what you will.

    Reply
  426. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    @liv4:

    Didn´t her mother let her stay in a white room when she was a small kid. The purpose was to keep her calm. She probably had and still has ADHD.

    Reply
  427. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    Pimp her children? the woman has a right to take her children anywhere she goes , same as you and me, Tell me something Liv4 do you pimp your Rugrats ? I didn’t think so, because no one is interested in your ugly ass Off spring.

    Reply
  428. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:01 pm

    Rushdog, you call Ms Jolie all kinds of names so how dare you question me when I do the same to others. You ignoramuses are beyond words.

    Reply
  429. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:02 pm

    Were all the “family” out to support Brad’s Moneyball premiere? I thought that was a big deal for him considering how long he worked to get it made and how important the film seemed to be to him. Just asking.

    Reply
  430. Patty Anne said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:05 pm

    I seriously doubt the AJ loonATICS can accept the fact that a person can dislike intensely behaviors that are an abberration to the norm and adversely affect their children. Disliking such behavior does not indicate “hating ” the person, but the action. Even using the word “hate” is wrong here but it seems to be one of very few words this multiple posting person is familiar with. The others being Freek, and Fat. Self descriptive? Who knows, but I’m not going to make an effort to understand someone who is beyond reasoning.
    We do NOT hate Angelina Jolie Voight, we do intensely disapprove her behaviors and lack of proper affect. Angelina is out of control or being allowed to indulge herself to the point of creating much havoc. This is untolerable in our society and reasonable people will discuss it and speak aloud of it. Get used to it.

    Reply
  431. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    Writing down ones thoughts for the synopsis of a movie can be done in 2 days or even when sick with the flu. Any intelligent person would know that it wiil take more time to flesh out the characters of the movie. Now shut your stinking mouth, Liv 4 , better yet get a freaking LIFE.

    Reply
  432. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:09 pm

    Thank god Angelina is not asking for your approval, Pattyanne. She lives her life as she sees fit as so it should be. Leave her children alone, they are not yours. Go take care of your hundred cats, LOL.

    Reply
  433. rushdog said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:11 pm

    @Brown Sugar:
    Show me where I’ve called Jolie all kinds of names, provide proof. I’ve been fairly controlled in my remarks about her, even supportive at times. I think at most I’ve referred to the couple as clowns and I know I’ve called him an ass. You don’t know of what you write.

    Jolie can take her children anywhere she goes, that’s right, but it quite clear from your comment to Liv4 that you too know that she does so to sell their faces.

    Keep right on typing Brown Sugar…

    Reply
  434. Patty Anne said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    And you take very good care of your dogs since they are the only friends you seem to have.@Brown Sugar:

    Reply
  435. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:25 pm

    Touche Pattyanne. Just let the woman live her life and enjoy her chidren . Is anyone stopping you from enyoying your meandgerie. Actually i have 4 beautiful cats, FYI.

    Reply
  436. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:30 pm

    @Brown Sugar:

    You may be right that these people said it was exellent. But I´m co.ncerned about the women being raped in the war. If they will see the movie I think they might react in a bad way. You are too young to know about a movie “The hohocaust” about WW2. There were a lot of horrible realistic sceens, including rapes. I saw this movie or better called TV series together with my inlaws. They both spent times in the concentration camps for about three years. We tried to stop them from watching but they said they had to see it. My Mil got ill from looking at it. There were too many bad memories. And in this case it was a bit more than thirty years between the war and the TV-series. In this present case it isn´t more than ten years. My comment had nothing to do with wether the movie is good or bad, I thought of the victims of the war.

    Reply
  437. Brown Sugar said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    Tetta please. how many times does Angelina have to say this. All of the actors in the movie approved of the script and better yet lived through the conflict and they wanted to tell the story., If you are so concerned why don’t you write to the liar Mr Braddock about writing about rapes in his book as Angie supposedly stole the story from him.

    Reply
  438. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    @Tetta:

    Sorry for wrong spelling, but to avoid any missunderstanding the name of the TV seties is “The Holocaust”.

    Reply
  439. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:44 pm

    @Brown Sugar:

    Has Angelina told you know if the actresses became raped in the war ?

    Reply
  440. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:48 pm

    @liv4:
    You are making some really good points…especially about the white room. joLIE seems to be grasping at straws, trying to come up with something to say, to sound arrrrrtistic…but she just sounds crazy, as usual. They are really digging deep, bringing out everyone joLIE has ever spoken to…even JLM was there. Of course, he could have been in town for visitation with Vivian ;) I wonder what would happen if Brad would have invited Jen to his Moneyball premiere? :shock:

    Reply
  441. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 5:57 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I guess BBT will show up eventually?

    Reply
  442. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    @joanne:
    Oh yeah! :) They can set up a play date for all their kids.

    Reply
  443. Patty Anne said on December 9th, 2011 at 6:20 pm

    MPAA Rating: R (for war violence and atrocities including r@pe, sexuality, nudity and language)
    http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=69037#ixzz1aoNmvRgo
    There you are Tetta. For it to have this rating there has to be at least one rape scene in the film. Rape is a violent crime against women, not a making love to a woman so that she would fall in love with her attacker and also, the women were anally raped the majority of the time.@Tetta:

    Reply
  444. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 6:20 pm

    Hey, what happened to angelooney? Are you out there lurking AW? If so, drop in and chat a bit. I miss your funny little stories.

    Reply
  445. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 6:23 pm

    How does BS know what’s in the movie? Has she seen it? None of the critics that were at either premiere are allowed to write about it so how does anyone who hasn’t seen it know what’s in it?

    Reply
  446. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 6:34 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Thank You for the information. So it doesn´t seem to be a familymovie.
    Then we can relax a bit.

    Reply
  447. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 6:55 pm

    @Tetta:
    Even Ange said she wouldn’t allow her children to view it….yet.

    Reply
  448. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 7:07 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    Does anyone remember both Angelina and Brad saying they should choose their movies more carefully now when they know their kids will se it some day. But that rule perhaps doesn´t matter if you are behind the camera.

    Reply
  449. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 7:09 pm

    @Tetta:
    :lol: yes, I do remember that lie, I mean comment ;)

    Reply
  450. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 7:30 pm

    @Tetta:
    Just another look how great I am lie.

    Reply
  451. WTF said on December 9th, 2011 at 7:31 pm

    not to try to be argumentative…..but does everyone BELIEVE every single quote attributed to celebs?? I think a lot is open to interpretation?

    Reply
  452. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 7:53 pm

    If you say something you should stand by it. Walk the walk not talk the talk.

    Reply
  453. Tetta said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:05 pm

    @WTF:

    It depends on the subject. I understand actors / actresses get enough of some questions. But in this case it´s a serious question and as parents of six children they ought to stand by what they say. It´s not only AJ and BP who need to think of this. It´s a question for most parents. You have to behave so that the children don´t get confused by what they see.

    Reply
  454. Cardak said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    http://www.dlisted.com/2011/12/08/angie-starving-herself-starving-children-world

    The source says that she “puts herself on fasts to make statements for the children she visits. She says, ‘If they can’t eat, I can’t eat. [She] does different cleanses from around the world. It’s very dramatic, but that’s how she gets.” A different source says that Brad is worried and has taken her to doctors, but they all tell him that there’s nothing wrong with her.

    Reply
  455. Kate said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:27 pm

    @Tetta:
    There was a critic that saw the film ar a screening about a month ago. He wrote about it on his FB. There were rape scenes in the film, anal rape of several woman while others were made to watch. Is someone now saying those scenes have been deleted?

    Reply
  456. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:42 pm

    @Cardak:
    She’s just a regular Gandhi. Maybe she should try living with them and donate the money the expensive hotels cost. Expensive clothes with the hungry look? What a poser she is.

    Reply
  457. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:46 pm

    Her tats ruin the glam look along with the boney arms and legs. Her hips were padded nicly and the straps gave her an illusion of a curved body.

    Reply
  458. Cardak said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    Brown Sugar, have you seen the movie? We know you loved the trailer.

    Reply
  459. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    just to stop by quick..
    Jen win the hottest woman of all time beat MM and AJ (she was on no 10)..from Mens health mag..
    congrat!!!..and..we see what the haters will said..I read some of their comments..ha.ha so funny..how we can not just be happy for others..
    anyway..about Aj movie..i think good on her if she is truly the script writer and director of this movie..and i think its will be critically acclaimed cause she has good team behind (she admit it)..and hope her fans put the effort on just spend the money on watching it than spew the hate to JA everytime there are something not going well ..and dont always assume when jen out and about ..its to stole the thunder of AJ..the world is big..there are room for everyone..

    btw..Bp wore glasses very similar to jen on LA premire..I think its a style people used when they want to hide their tired eyes..dont think because of copycat..the same with AJ pictures on the mag…its not JA trademark that face expression..vice versa..

    Reply
  460. janindisguise said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:07 pm

    @joanne:
    Hahahaha. Good point.

    Reply
  461. janindisguise said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    @Kate:
    I was just reading how directors LOVE rape scenes. I read that on an MK information site tonight. It is part of the programming of mks. Sick but true unfortunately. So someone’s a mk victim and/or programmer. But then I think everyone pretty much figures that, no?

    No rape scenes for me but I appreciate the heads up on that.

    Reply
  462. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:14 pm

    @joanne:
    I think ..this is really rediculous. but.if this source really come from AJ camp and not lies…. this is made me think that she is desperate to build her saint image..she even has the excuse for her eating disorder that made her look not bad?..what supreme marketer she is…its show that image is everything..and she will never want to be out of the spotlight..

    anyway,,I wonder why AJ kept saying she didnt have girlfriend..when its show she was with gwen Stefany and holly quite long time….it seem she really want to create contraversy and differention with JA??..the same with hate to wear jeans?..
    and they said jen who dragging on to kept her on the triangle..when she didnt even comment anymore about it..even when Bp comment about how boring was his marriage to her..
    but brangie fans still hate on jen.,,they even called JTx name and accuse him as a gold digger./famewhoring as the only reason he ever want to be with jen .and no way can love jen…this is on Celebithy JJ and the rest of Brangie fans site…
    they even blame on her for the outrage that cause by BP comment..when she didnt even start it or inflame it..
    I still cant understand the hatred toward jen..from Brangie fans..and when people like lurker,BS,the the rest of their fanatic fans comment on why this site dislike AJ..they should look at themself first on the mirror..
    but unfortunately..they will never do..

    Reply
  463. joanne said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    @siska:
    I don’t get it either. If they wanted to get our attention they succeeded. If Pitt and jolie didn’t make Aniston look pathetic no one would have cared. Hollyweird marriages come and go but why throw the ex under the bus? I guess you have to step on a lot of souls to get on the top. I like it at the bottom more and more everyday.

    Reply
  464. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:41 pm

    and they want to blame FF and this site for not wanting to worship Brangie?..not everyone has the same taste..and you can not push everyone to like your idol by trashing someone else..like jen and her fans..its not gonna work..you can not fight fire with fire.and btw..not all of the people who dislike AJ mean that they are JA fans..vice versa..not all the people who love JA will hate Brangie…..the bigger the profile..the more wave they will made.they will have more people worship them and so do the haters..thats why Matt Damon..take on Brangie and other famous.. couple phenomena..that if you take away sex and scandal..the press/public will not interest on you..but if you kept feeding them..thats way you got the fame and the chaos with it.so you have to accept it..and Brangie already accept it when they publish their brand with W mag and sold the kids picture to the mag and made couple of comment about it….so its a fair game for the public to judge them.
    the same with Jen..when she open her heart on vanity fair and shred a tear after the divorce..she allow the public to judge her…at least with her..she sort of learn to be more discreetive after ,,only one hiccup with not cool comment..( in my gullible brain..i think she might be accidently blurb it..cause she didnt like to be picture of a women who being cheated on..but when AJ comment about how she cant wait to show the kids the movie they fallen in love with..which will confirm that jen being cheated on..she isnt happy..)..cause she even told her friends to tell the media that they are divorcing is nothing to do with someone cheated..so why Aj fans want to hate her..when she never accuse AJ blatanly about it..she even on the record deny it..
    and jen already saying on the record that she is proud of Bp with his family and his humanatarian effort..and she only wish the best for him and she will always treasure their past and will always love him for it..but its over….and admit they only talk to said congratulation..no charge or other intention of going back..
    so why they always think jen want to be back with him?..

    sorry for my sort of rant..cause i got a bit emotion when read the comment about jen on site like celebitchy (they ban me for posting jen defending post)..and JJ….they even mention her when they talk about their own idol..blame her for everything..I can understand sometime jen fans did the same..I think negative post bring more hit cause make people want to argue more..and I have to admit..i got suck on it.too..he..he

    anyway..for SRW…thanks for the link of jen on the X17..doing undercover..I read the comment..wow..the haters really scary..no wonder she need bodyguard..there are too much crazy people in the world..

    Reply
  465. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    @joanne:
    I think maybe 1. because they know ,,by poking in jen..her fans will fight back..and make the post more hit
    or 2. jen is easy target..3. they are jealous why jen still success/work in HW eventhough already being dumbed by the hottest man and his hottest woman 4.jen still made their idol look bad?..

    Reply
  466. janindisguise said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    Regarding the “sainthood” – “do one’s good deeds in SECRET, and one will be rewarded in the open”.

    Reply
  467. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    @siska:
    Hi siska, that expression may not be jen’s trademark but it’s far from aj’s glamour shots. I think she was either mocking jen or copying her. It seems like she’s a bit obsessed with her. And I agree with you about the loons. They are all over the gossip sites calling jen and justin names awful names, then they come here and accuse other posters of doing what they themselves do. Look in a mirror first is what they should be doing.

    What I don’t understand about this movie is all the hype. AJ herself called it a tiny little movie in one of her interviews and yet they are promoting it like it’s the greatest movie of all time. Two premieres in one week, photos splashed on all the sites, brad’s parents front and center. Like someone said earlier, they didn’t come to their son’s premier of MB but they are all over the place with aj. This is what I find so annoying with these two. They are so over the top in everything they do. They are a couple of egomaniacs. I think they really believe they are the king and queen of HW.

    Reply
  468. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    @WTF:
    yeah but even you choose to believe the quote from JA if that made her look bad..cause i see that you not her fans. (by reading some of your previous comment on the different site).so that vice versa to Aj situation..and..when is come from their own mouth..its hard to said that it isnt the truth..anyway…the truth only known to themself..but the public will always judge you..by what you did and said..specially if you are famous..

    Reply
  469. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    @janindisguise:
    very good point..but unfortunately..in the twitter and internet era..the more public of your good deed being splasterd..its good image and good business..

    Reply
  470. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    @Guest2:
    I can understand your point..its might be the point..I really cant understand AJ..cause..she seem want to potray as a cool ,wild nature..dont care attitude by making all the outrages comment and attitude..but in the other side she want the world to see her as a saint with the mother earth image and humanatarian stuff..but seem to bother about what jen did (IF it is true that she copy cat jen and try to hire Jtx as her costar)
    But I hope she didnt ..cause she has so much on her plate..why she is bother about jen..maybe only to create contraversy for pr?…all of them used it anyway.
    ..i think this movie is a big deal cause she declare it as her first time both scriptwriting and directing a movie..
    so the success or failure of it..depend on her..so its a big deal for her..
    from all the pictures..i think BP mum..really seem to love the limelight..and ..its a great match for AJ..so they might get along fine..and maybe it is true that Bp mum actually help AJ to be better person..I wish she also help her with her weight..it is hard to potray a happy person..with a skinnyy bone..sorry its just my opinion..

    Reply
  471. siska said on December 9th, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    ok ciao…take care..

    Reply
  472. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 10:03 pm

    @siska:
    I see the same thing you do, glad you said it.

    Reply
  473. Guest2 said on December 9th, 2011 at 10:06 pm

    @siska:
    Bye siska.

    Reply
  474. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:10 pm

    Congratulations to Jen :) She is the Hottest Woman of All Time! Wow, that’s an amazing title :) All she had to do was be herself. Go Jen!

    Reply
  475. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:13 pm

    @Cardak:
    He must be taking her to ‘quacks’, if they are telling him that there’s nothing wrong with her ;)

    Reply
  476. Up the Coast said on December 9th, 2011 at 11:14 pm

    @siska:
    Nice rant siska :)

    Reply
  477. checkmate said on December 10th, 2011 at 5:20 am

    many here dont like angelina, but many think that EVERYONE IN AMERICA HATES HER! NOT.TRUE. and not EVERYONE IN AMERICA LOVES Jennifer either. that men’s survey proclaiming her the sexiest/hottest woman of ALL TIME is laughable!!!!!!!! jen is attractive in a well-groomed way, but
    this poll is a big, fat, FAIL.

    Reply
  478. Tetta said on December 10th, 2011 at 7:02 am

    @Kate:
    You probably has got an answer on your question about the rape scen by now but I saw it first now, saturday morning swedish time. I havn´t heard anything about taking the rape scen away from AJ´s movie. My comment was an answer to the person who told us how lucky the actresses were to take part in AJ´s movie. My point was if women who had been raped for real during the war were equal positiv about the movie as the actresses are.

    Reply
  479. Guest2 said on December 10th, 2011 at 9:21 am

    @checkmate:
    You always give yourself away as a brangeloonie. No one here thinks what you say they think.

    Reply
  480. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    @checkmate:
    Like the lying polls that used to make Jolie the sexiest woman alive?

    Reply
  481. checkmate said on December 10th, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    i am a brangeloonie? what does that make you? a jenniferloonie?

    Reply
  482. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    I used to be a pittloon but now I’m ashamed of my bad judgement.

    Reply
  483. Guest2 said on December 10th, 2011 at 12:49 pm

    @checkmate:
    Nope. I like jen better than the other two who I think are a couple of the biggest fakes in hollywood. They are so in our faces with their fakery that they deserve to be called out on it by people on sites like this and that’s why I’m here, not to create a jen fan club. You are the one who says how much you like jen and justin and then turn around and trash jen with your comments above. If you’re going to pretend you’re not a brangeloon at least learn how to do it convincingly.

    Reply
  484. Guest2 said on December 10th, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    @joanne:
    It wasn’t bad judgment. It’s just that pitt has either changed since hooking up with jolie or he is finally showing his true colors. As I said in an earlier post, he used to be very charming and likeable in his interviews. That brad is gone.

    Reply
  485. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 1:30 pm

    @Guest2:
    I wouldn’t give anyone 2 cents for him now. Thanks its better to be pulled in by charm instead of bad judgment.

    Reply
  486. janindisguise said on December 10th, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    In some of these pictures, BP appears to be a lookalike (hereinafter referred to as “Unbrad”). It’s off and on – sometimes Unbrad – sometimes Brad. It’s the nose. I might believe that he had some work done, but the pictures are so on-again, off-again. Like one time I’ll see Unbrad and then next time the real BP, and so on. So, I’ve really got that on my mind. Politicians, celebrities, and all have stand ins. That is a fact.

    Oh, and I hope whoever is trying to get my cookies, or whatever, is having a blast! I sure don’t mean it’s any of you guys – but someone. Heh.

    Reply
  487. Up the Coast said on December 10th, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    @joanne:
    :lol: Yea….like those???

    Reply
  488. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    @janindisguise:
    Be careful. My email was spammed. I had to get rid of all my contacts.

    Reply
  489. Up the Coast said on December 10th, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    @janindisguise:
    People who have been brainwashed also appear like that…..up and down, off and on, depending on what part of the ‘cycle’ they are in. It doesn’t take much to brainwash a person. A couple of all nighters, repeating the same thing over and over, and before you know it…they will agree to anything for a little sleep. A few days of normality, and then right back on that crazy train. In a year, your family and friends will be wondering what the hell happened to you :shock:

    Reply
  490. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Thats what they do in Basic Training. Another trick is hurry up and wait.

    Reply
  491. Bluesuedeshoes said on December 10th, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    Well, new plagiarism charges for Cameron and Lightstorm Entertainment, pursuant to the globally successful pic Avatar. The Hollywood blow me faggots at it again, always ripping off some one to enrich themselves. Now I have a question. Why would anyone, and I mean anyone, ever want to look up to any sleazeball Hollywood scumbag ever? For even a nano second. Between there faggotry, rip off thieving, their repeated rapes, murders, drug addictions (and I am not referring to pot,) their sexualization of children, their far leftist crap, why would anyone want to be like these demented fools. All of you women here, and many men as well, you are full of excuses. You literally, on a daily basis, attempt to intellectualize away, and further justify this unadulterated crap. The UN is a joke for ever having AJ as a representative, BP has just as an abhorrent background, JA isn’t much better either. Look at all the men she has been involved with, let alone JTxL, his background is replete with trashy rubbish. Look at his friends, TR, hahahahahah lolololol, give me a break. What were one of you the other day saying, GC for President, that will never happen. We as a country will never have that self obsessed azz as a President. We wouldn’t let that jerk ever let him put his finger on “THE BUTTON,” and I mean ever. Then another of you admit to being a lobbyist, which I already knew by the way, typifies the ongoing receipt of deception found in any quarter connected to Hollywood. This idiot Siska, thinks this fauxmance is real? JA gets up and states she isn’t getting married, is not pregnant, and doesn’t want to talk about her new BF. The one she worked with as a telemarketer in LA before she ever was anything in Hollywood. All this fake HBiv crap. How much was HB paid to go alone with this charade? Hmmmmm? Maybe it is, but I seriously doubt the dubious nature of anything connected to the CCA organization either. Women , and men of course, that are here, typify what is wrong with this country. Who was it that said the other day that they thought Ole Bling Bling Obamling was a good Prez? He is the worst, unless you think its right that everyone should be reduced to poverty! Joe blowme Bidemytime, states the first person they turned to was Corzine, another Bernie Maddof, who publicly states that he doesn’t know where $1,200,000,000.00 of other peoples money went.
    Then a news story breaks stating Soros bought bonds in MF Global activities. Well I guess we now know where the money went don’t we. Your darling JA has her little 5 review with one of the biggest political crooks today, Nanny P, and you think she is wonderful. She has always been involved with these people, so have her grandparents and parents, and they are all Scieno Scammingfaketologists. The biggest tax fraud in US history. No, me thinks you are undoubtedly hypocrites of the most rank odor, and order. All of you do one thing alone, make excuses rather than standing up and telling the truth. Lets not forget your buddies AW and Audblowme, there records are quite clear, unsavory and scammers to say the least. Whom was it that stated “You would have to have a scorecard to know who is on the field.” No doubt a true statement. Whats on first, who’s on second, I don’t know who is on third!!! You are shills for fakery and falsehood. Personally, I think JA deserves JTxL, and the sack of crap that he really is. I hope she marries him, and they can go out and collect children like her very good childhood friends AJ and BP. Everyone in Hollywood knows this is factual. Just because the media doesn’t report it doesn’t make it untrue. You people need to wake up to the scam going on around you. We don’t need leaders based upon their looks. We don’t need role models that way either. You women are incredibly screwed up. You are the type of morons whom gave us the KIMKA cARTRASHIANS!! Geeez thanks alot for your wonderful ideas. The mommy pimp come out and states she thinks she is owed an apology? Bwahahahahaha! JA gets up and states she met them and she thinks they’re ok, just fine, great? What is going on in that bobble head of hers? Do you think it was a script or her real heart felt feelings?
    Dancing away in my blue suede shoes,
    Arnold the term germ
    “I love Thanksgiving, its the only time of year where there are real breasts in Hollywood.”
    Things are never what they seem.
    Dancing away in my Blue Suede Shoes

    Reply
  492. Patty Anne said on December 10th, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    I think the Brad Pitt who began an illicit, adulterous affair with The Town Pump ( thanks again Uma Thurman) was the real Brad getting away with what he’d done before. I’ve read he’d cheated on Jen at least twice before this time, so what does that say for his handlers in keeping this news so quiet? He’s a narcissist, youngest child of three who was pampered by an adoring mother. That Brad felt he was entitled to do what he wanted, but he was also just enough scaredy cat to be concerned. When he hooked up with Angie – who – will – do – anything – you – ask – her – to – do – in – bed ( source Colin Farrell) he was hooked! BJ’s all he wanted, anal sex both giving and receiving, drugs, liquor….ah! He was reaping his rewards for being The Brad Pitt!! That’s when he began his downward slide to the Hell he’s in now. He created this scenario, now he has to live with it. He purchased a Malibu Beach House thinking he would be living the great life of a single man while his wife waited for him to “get his head clear”. But his sex toy had other ideas – she wanted him as a trophy and a step up the ladder of success in HW. His contacts would give her validation as more than a computer game heroine. Enter the pregnancy with Shiloh – the first pregnancy she had that she did not abort. Oh Bradleyyyyyyy, guess what?? I can’t get rid of it, you mean so much to me, she’s a part of both of us, what would your parents say?…..Hook, line and sunk. Everything about this pairing has been manipulated by one or both. Fidelity isn’t an issue? He’s the love of my life? HUH? It’s all fabricated for the effect it generates that enables them to live the lifestyle they feel they deserve. But truly….isn’t the cost high? Not to them, who really cares about what they’ve done to themselvs by free will…..what about the collection of the paparrazi named, “Child Army”…already a joke. Each child has been labeled, and a future fantasized and printed out in the press. USED….for further effect. So sad. Those poor kids will one day , not long off now, begin talking and once started won’t stop.

    Reply
  493. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Great post Patty Anne, that about sums it up.

    Reply
  494. Guest2 said on December 10th, 2011 at 3:22 pm

    @joanne:
    I second that, Patty Anne.

    Reply
  495. Guest2 said on December 10th, 2011 at 3:25 pm

    @janindisguise:
    :lol: The “Unbrad”, too funny. You have to check the bod and the legs to make sure it’s the real brad. But is the real brad or unbrad who has peepaw legs?

    Reply
  496. Guest2 said on December 10th, 2011 at 3:30 pm

    By the way, my computer was attacked when I went into the X17 site yesterday and the day before it happened on the Blind Gossip site (that was the first time but it happened in the past with X17). My antivirus program blocked it but I won’t go there anymore. I read once that viruses are hidden in the names of certain celebrities that are frequently googled, like brad pitt. I still go to FF to read and haven’t had a problem for quite a while but I’ve noticed some posters there have complained about their computers being attacked.

    Reply
  497. Up the Coast said on December 10th, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    @joanne:
    Yep!

    Reply
  498. Up the Coast said on December 10th, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, that sums it up nicely. I can’t stand how she’s forced these children into characters already, and she did it before they were even able to speak. NOW…she’s claiming that the reason she went into acting is because her mother pushed her into it….hmm. Hello? She’s an idiot. I can’t wait to hear what these kids have to say :)

    Reply
  499. whatever said on December 10th, 2011 at 5:16 pm

    In the land of Hollywood, what sets an actor/actress apart from the rest, if they have a “gimmick”.

    Jolie-Pitt had a gimmick, it was called robo-adopting 3rd world “orphans”, and birthing out a couple in a few short years… not being married…and their supposedly philanthropy.

    That is the “gimmick” that had built them up. Eventually the “gimmick” gets old, and can’t sell anymore.

    However in every interview, still today, Pitt and Jolie are asked, “Are you going to adopt/birth anymore kids?” “Are you ever going to get married?”. Eventually the media are going to care less. The majority of the public are no longer impressed. If you notice not even her trips abroad for humanitarian reasons are no longer covered by the mainstream media….and more or less are only carried by celebrity blogs. Also, there haven’t been those HUGE charitable donations, in a couple of years either, because the public was seeing that pattern that every time they had a movie to promote they came out with a donation of some kind or another…to use as PR tool.

    Basically the ‘gimmick’ gets old, is no longer able to “SELL” it to the mass public and they grow bored, and this is what is happening with Brad and Angelina. Now they will have to do one or two things: Adopt/Birth out another “gimmick” or do the “we ARE getting married “gimmick”. Either or, it is not a sure thing that will put them back on top. It could very well back-fire on them also. The public will see if for exactly what it is, just another “gimmick” for them both to get back on top.

    Reply
  500. janindisguise said on December 10th, 2011 at 6:07 pm

    Hello. No one can get my cookies. My virus protection blocked it. Shoot – the virus protection even tells me from whence it came.

    Whoever that is can kiss my sweet southern a _ _.

    Shalom and so forth.

    Reply
  501. Up the Coast said on December 10th, 2011 at 6:12 pm

    This occured in front of the Arclight Theatre, the morning after joLIE’s LA premiere:
    http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2011/12/sunset_vine_hollywood_officer_shooting_lapd.php

    Reply
  502. Patty Anne said on December 10th, 2011 at 8:06 pm

    With the plethora of Jolie photos out this week I’ve had plenty of opportunities to examine her face in several. We know that two sides of the human face are not identical but…..BUT…..her face has changed greatly over the past year or slightly less. Some damage has occured to her right eye area which is very noticable if you take a close up photo of her and lay a sheet of paper on one side blocking it out so you only see one half of her face, then do the other side the same way. She’s lost that ability to do the “sexy squint” in her right eye that she did in the movie trailer for Wanted. That indicates muscle damage, irrepairable muscle damage. There are other slight tell tale signs as well.

    Reply
  503. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 8:19 pm

    @whatever:
    Now that you said this there will be a donation somewhere. :twisted:

    Reply
  504. Liz E. said on December 10th, 2011 at 9:19 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    ” . . . if you take a close up photo of her and lay a sheet of paper on one side blocking it out so you only see one half of her face, then do the other side the same way . . .”

    LOL! Patty Anne, please stop before you drive yourself insane. ;)

    Reply
  505. del said on December 10th, 2011 at 9:29 pm

    Pattyanne
    there you again. First, brad is not the youngest of three..he is the eldest. Now, you are a licensed physician.

    Reply
  506. liv4 said on December 10th, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    @Patty Anne: I also noticed something wrong with her eye around the beginning of last spring, maybe around the time of the stroll in NOLA. Unfortunate.

    Reply
  507. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 10:16 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol: I also exmaine pictures like that when something looks off and her face has been off for awhile.

    Reply
  508. del said on December 10th, 2011 at 10:20 pm

    @whatever
    Where have you been ” they havent donated to charity in a few years” In 2010, it was publicized that the JP’s donated $8 million to many different charities. If you’re not american.. in the US we dont file taxes for 2011 until 2012 so you dont know and the public doesnt know what/how many charities they donated to this year until the press inform us since its public record or if you are so curious you can look it up. If Im not mistaken it was reported that they donated to Somalia this year. Also, there was mainstream media coverage of her humanitarian trips this year. If you want to believe that interest is dying down so be it. But again, not too many stars get the cover Newsweek and appear on 60 minutes (17 million viewers) … and because so many people watched over a holiday weekend..the homeless families in Florida that were featured on the program received so many donations from all over the country. That’s the power of the Jolie Pitt’s, people watched because Jolie was being featured. and for a small (budget wise) movie she sure got a lot of press.

    Reply
  509. joanne said on December 10th, 2011 at 10:24 pm

    Train wrecks always get a lot of press.

    Reply
  510. Up the Coast said on December 10th, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    @joanne:
    :)

    Reply
  511. Up the Coast said on December 10th, 2011 at 10:46 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    She’s off allright……off her rocker :lol:

    Reply
  512. janindisguise said on December 10th, 2011 at 11:44 pm

    I really must begin to read the poster’s name B4 I start reading the text. Argh!

    Reply
  513. whatever said on December 11th, 2011 at 12:11 am

    8 million was back in 2006, when they were trying to buy the public’s acceptance and bury the homewrecking/adultery/oops I had Brad’s baby and it was conceived while he was still a legally married man, and change their IMAGES to Saint Angelina and Saint Brad, saviors of the world, to cover up their duplicity.

    They haven’t donated THAT much in a years time since then. 4.9 in 2009……NOT 8 million…like you want to state….the information is out there, however I am not about to waste my time, and energy bringing it all here for you……go fetch it yourself.

    1.5 million for 2011.

    Since then, it’s been much less each year….and ONLY because now they use it as a TAX BREAK.

    BTW, that money, that was “donated” came out of the total exploitation of those children…to a tune of 22 + millions of dollars. NOTHING came out of their own pockets.

    Jolie supposedly (according to Forbes magazine) made 30 Million dollars last year. So FROM her OWN mouth she stated, she gave 1/3 of her income to charity. So where did 10 million dollars go? She hasn’t, doesn’t and will NEVER give 1/3 of her income away….she is a LIAR.

    And I never said they didn’t donate money, I said, they weren’t giving those HUGE donations out like they did in 2006/2007. Stop changing words in my posts, when it is there for anyone to read.

    Here is the snippet of my post:

    Also, there haven’t been those HUGE charitable donations, in a couple of years either, because the public was seeing that pattern that every time they had a movie to promote they came out with a donation of some kind or another…to use as PR tool.

    Reply
  514. Patty Anne said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:39 am

    LOL, what a defense that would be during trial…., Liz to witness, “Please stop before you drive yourself insane, oh wait! That IS a defense”. Come on Liz, you can do better than that supercillious comment.@Liz E.:

    Reply
  515. Patty Anne said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:40 am

    Oh Del, please stop before you drive yourself insane. ;-) @del:

    Reply
  516. siska said on December 11th, 2011 at 6:51 am

    @Up the Coast:
    you know..this poll really bug people?..he..he..there are so many hate comments about it..and I bet..its 99% are from women..damn..why people just be more relax about life..its just a poll..and really not worth the angry and hates energy waste for..and why we cant be happy for others..its show how woman is more critical about other woman…and people have different taste..so you cant be angry for someone else opinion or taste..

    Reply
  517. siska said on December 11th, 2011 at 6:56 am

    @checkmate:
    your first and second statement make sense..and I also think the same..but the last sentence about the poll is a joke..whatever..why? because the winner is not your favourite?..remember everyone has different taste..and its just a silly poll from a Mens health mag..and they already said ..jen is the winner..cause she is funny and related and strong enough to bear all the gossip through the years..and you have to admit..she is maintain relative consistent body and sort of healthy body frame thorugh her years..she never been anorexia type or obese type…so please open your mind..dont just talk basic on your preference of others star.

    Reply
  518. siska said on December 11th, 2011 at 6:58 am

    @joanne:
    check mate!!

    Reply
  519. siska said on December 11th, 2011 at 6:59 am

    @Guest2:
    wow..becareful!!!

    Reply
  520. siska said on December 11th, 2011 at 7:05 am

    @Patty Anne:
    we might just a buch of insane people here..enjoying talking about our idol who didnt give a hoot about us..he..he… but we love it..and its fun..as long no one like BS..who only do well on talk trash and wish ill will to others..we should be all entertain ourself with civilize arguments just fine..

    we are all the same coorporation called idolloonies..he..he

    Reply
  521. siska said on December 11th, 2011 at 7:06 am

    ok take care..everyone..i want to know..how bad is the pool outrage people..he..he..its actually a good pr for jen…they keep mention her name when they keep this contraversy on..

    Reply
  522. siska said on December 11th, 2011 at 7:07 am

    correction Poll..he..he..byee

    Reply
  523. del said on December 11th, 2011 at 9:02 am

    Like I said you dont know what the JP’s donated in 2011 since taxes are not filed until 2012. and I hate to brek to you but it wasnt in 2006 that they donted $8 million.

    Reply
  524. jansa said on December 11th, 2011 at 9:16 am

    really checkmate i think that first of all it is time that people realize that skinny and boney is not healthy or a happy state to be nor is stealing a story from other peoples hard work and proclaiming it as your own a honest thing to do. if you want to tell a story about war and rape be real because the only woman that will fall in love with her rapist and a man that allows others to rape her as well must be mentally disturbed by the first rape and blocking it out by thinking she is in love with her rapist.
    it is a sad and disgusting world that romanticizes rape and war into a love story and no i am not a rape victim but a normal woman that in no way would be able to love my rapist i would rather cut his balls out with a blunt knife than love him. lets be honest jolie and pitt are only famous because people are interested in them because of the adultery and cheating that is now being glorified romantically because a man like peewee herman was bored and wanted kids to sell and drag around the world for more pr.
    it is time holly wood retired these two fake humanitarianism and talent less actors with more fame for being in trash mags and using the poor and hungry of this world for their own pr. the world is bored and disgusted by them as you can see by the box office numbers . if i never hear of another movie made or acted by these two i would be very happy and as for Oscar noms that is a joke and the only reason they are nominated is to get viewers that want to watch these two fail to get a Oscar and if peewee does receive one then the Oscars are really a bought and paid for show as he has not shown any box office pull and his acting is pathetic.jmo good for the people that picked a healthy woman and not a surgically made bony sickly adulteress with no talent. jmo

    Reply
  525. del said on December 11th, 2011 at 10:03 am

    I agree with Brown Sugar about the Hatred for JP’S and this is anti-angelina site. Who calls a mother of six .. drug addict, anorexic, accuses the mother not birthing the biological children of their partner, giving birth to children at age 15 by a man 30 years her senior with no proof they knew each other at that time, abortions, again with no proof. Although I dont follow the British Press and dont know much about their celebrities.. But I felt so bad for Harry (at age 12) when the tabs started questioning who is father is after he lost his mother.

    Reply
  526. del said on December 11th, 2011 at 10:28 am

    and to the poster who stated that why the James Braddock suit isnt on the first page of google because once everyone read his lawsuit they thought he was crazy. They stole his idea about “Make it Right” in New Orleans, USA?
    Even Michael K of disted had to say he buried himself Jolie can use his own words as defense. BTW, JK rowling for Harry Potter , steven spielberg, and now James cameron for Avatar, Author for “the Help”.. Angie responded these things are always expected (it’s nothing new). But again she and brad’s stardom are declining.

    Reply
  527. joanne said on December 11th, 2011 at 12:00 pm

    so that your giving will be in secret; and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you.
    5“When you pray, you are not to be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners so that they may be seen by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full. 6“But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you.
    Matthew 6.4

    Reply
  528. janindisguise said on December 11th, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    @joanne:
    Aha and amen Joanne!

    Reply
  529. Guest2 said on December 11th, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    @joanne:
    Thank you, Joanne. I’m Catholic and I love going to church when no one is there and praying in solitude. Now I don’t feel so guilty for not going to Mass every Sunday.

    Reply
  530. Guest2 said on December 11th, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    Michael K from Dlisted is one of my all-time favorite bloggers (IUC being the best) and since del brought him up I thought I’d bring this one over for a few laughs:

    “St. Angie’s severed head mysteriously floating on the pages of Newsweek reminded me of something buried deep in my childhood and I just couldn’t put my brain on it. But THANK MADDOX for Dlisted reader Elizabeth, because she solved the case. Floating Angie Head IS the Evil Spirit from The Care Bears Movie. Life suddenly makes sense. Elizabeth puts it like this:

    I was just reading your story, “Angie’s Head Floats onto Newsweek,” and I was struck by the thought of, where the hell have I seen this creepy face before…? And then it hit me…the Evil Spirit from The Care Bears Movie! That freaky ass book scared the shit out of me as a child, just as St. Angie is doing in those Newsweek pics, so I feel it is only fitting to make the Spirit HSOTD.”

    There’s more but you’ll have to go to Dlisted to read it.

    Reply
  531. Evil Kitty said on December 11th, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    @Guest2:

    hahaha, OMG I googled evil spirit from care bear movie and went to images and it’s true! :lol:

    http://www.retrojunk.com/img/art-images/80scare_spirit.jpg

    Reply
  532. Evil Kitty said on December 11th, 2011 at 1:14 pm

    For comparison, he is the Angelina floating head in Newsweek pic. If these links don’t pan out, just go to google and images, hehe.

    http://www.x17online.com/Angelina%20Jolie/angienewsweek460.jpg

    Reply
  533. del said on December 11th, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    guess what ? not too many HW stars get the cover of newsweek and coverage on 60 minutes.. and Jolie keeps forging on.

    Reply
  534. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    @siska:
    joLIE fans only believe the polls that their idol wins…all the others are just silly polls ;) Go figure. But this poll isn’t for just a year….It’s for all time! :) Go Jen!

    Reply
  535. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    @jansa:
    I am also disgusted by her attempt to romanticize rape.

    Reply
  536. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @joanne:
    That’s right ;) Giving should be a humbling experience, not a chance to sing your own praises. Good Grief!

    Reply
  537. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    @Guest2:
    :lol:

    Reply
  538. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    @del:
    Come on, seriously??? Why don’t you go look up WHO owns Newsweek. And 60 Minutes, they do fluff pieces all the time.

    Reply
  539. janindisguise said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    Newsweek, et al. = propoganda. Probably written by Goebbels himself.

    Reply
  540. joanne said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I am too. I have my own memories to know it is hard to fall in love with a rapist. Most people have frightening memories.

    Reply
  541. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    @joanne:
    he/she are everywhere now, making themselves like piles of vomit others have to dodge. i think she has embarrassed these hw and political people with the ever present stupidity of words, her obvious bullsh!t claims of story telling/movie making and arrogant dismissal of actual directors and writers. and now the actual headlines of the lawsuit made the difference between saddling up to her flat skanky ass or staying home.

    Reply
  542. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    @Armitage:
    i can’t think of his name right now, but the big guy who plays earl’s (jason lee) brother randy, is also scientologist.

    Reply
  543. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    maybe he is out and about because he knows other high profile pedophiles’ names.

    Reply
  544. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:53 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    sounds like earl has been in contact. :P
    or somethin’.

    Reply
  545. Guest2 said on December 11th, 2011 at 3:58 pm

    @Bluesuedeshoes:
    So first you come here and give us a bu**sh*t story about how you knew all the aniston family in your granny’s neighborhood where you grew up and jen was your friend (aha) and now you’re back spewing this crap. Saxxm, go refill your prozac prescription, your multiple personalities are out of control again.

    Reply
  546. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    disgusting!!!!!
    and sounds just about right.
    they are trash.

    Reply
  547. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    or somethin’ ;) I blame his wife for this. She should have said NO.

    Reply
  548. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 4:11 pm

    @Guest2:
    Good catch!

    Reply
  549. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    what jolie’s family does is NOT like just any other family does. her family is very different. she claims she doesn’t even like to be touched. i wonder why.
    @Lurker:

    Reply
  550. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    hahaha, i agree. she should have asked him if he was high too.

    Reply
  551. Up the Coast said on December 11th, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    At least that would have made sense! :)

    Reply
  552. selfffrighteouswhore said on December 11th, 2011 at 5:19 pm

    @Guest2:
    it does look like it! :P

    i have slooooow internet where i am right now, but will just say that there are some grand comments above. the loon lobby and lunatics come in to defend the dandeho and end up making dandeho look worse. imagine that. people googling joLIE’S love story/homage to a sadist raping and brainwashing and murdering a woman get to see the real woman behind the lies and the maniacs who love her.

    Reply
  553. Bluesuedeshoes said on December 11th, 2011 at 9:36 pm

    If you want to know what is happening to your computers I will give you a little run down on what I suspect.
    First if you are using Ms Visteeee, you more than likely have games on it. If your computers are slowing, you are getting a popup in tour bottom right corner on high cpu usage, and getting the dreaded grey screen here is more than likely what is happening. The ccc.exe is an executable for cristal control center, a part of the ATI graphics package if you are using ATI. This is of course no fault of ATI. The Cristal control center is mostly for gamers. The reason they go after this is to knock you off line because the CCC.exe will suddenly pop up. This is because the perps are specifically hiding the virus, trojans, bots, malware in the games. It is using CCC.exe as a weapon to actually take over your computer. It will cause constant shutdowns, stop your virus protection from taking over, actually stop your virus protection from loading etc. But it gets worse. What I believe has happened is that this entire site is being used as a setup for distributing a virus/trojan bot net. I have multiple reasons for believing this. What these type of worms do is start to download whatever data is stored on your computer. I mean everything. Passwords, Credit Card info, email, letters, writings as in journals, books, articles, whatever they can get. This also includes cell phone numbers, land line numbers personal and work addresses, ip addresses, and essentially every site you visit, bookmarks, chat rooms as in private messaging, you name it whatever they can get. I suspect D-unlisted is the same, as well as FF, get the point. The second part of this is to see what pops up elsewhere on the net, or lame stream media. So I believe this is the case, recently I tracked massive events. Many times these attacks will originate from places Like Hungary, Bosnia, or other former Eastern Block European countries. Many time mafia types will be involved. They are just eatern block mafia, they are still organized crime. Who was it that wrote about pitifulfoolishnesses person in an accident, overseas? Didn’t someone here state this individual had a high level of hacking abilities? You people need to start putting together the pieces. I tracked events in close proximity to Long Island NY. Guns disappearing in Hungary, guns disappearing in LALA land, Gun selling locations in close proximity to a shipping container supplier, not just wood either, but more importantly plastic. Someone. or a group of someones is doing a whole lot of looking?

    Reply
  554. joanne said on December 11th, 2011 at 11:07 pm

    I know if the feds want you thery will find you, no matter where you are. The average pc user is not anonymous. There are hackers everywhere it seems. They all want that last buck in your pocket
    We need a big hug from the sun or Jesus. It would be neat if they came at the same time.

    Reply
  555. joanne said on December 12th, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @Bluesuedeshoes:
    The attacks happen on a J/P threads, esp when the comments are getting negative. It used to happen on the Bush threads too.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

December 2011
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Meta