IUC World Exclusive: And The Names of My New Tome is…….

Posted on July 9th, 2011 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Chasing Gaga: Beyond The Santorum of Shine, chasing gagaSex and Soul Surfing

  • 458 Comments
  • Tags:
  1. Dream said on July 9th, 2011 at 12:37 pm

    Wow good title. love it and love that pic u look to be havinga good time .

    Reply
  2. stran said on July 9th, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    So all the Brangelina BS was only to attract traffic for the book about Gaga.

    Reply
  3. joanne said on July 9th, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    I started out liking her music then she became to madonnaish.

    Reply
  4. Kate said on July 9th, 2011 at 5:05 pm

    I think she is truly talented, more so than Madonna (jmo), but I can see why many would feel she copied Madge, they both can put on a show , and knows how to market themselves. There were those rumors of both of these ladies and one other all doing the boogie together, not all at the same time, but they all seem to be tied to each . Ian are you going to cover any of that in this tome? I didn’t like Gaga’s stunt with the meat. Didn’t like Madonnas Sex book, didn’t look like art to me. I don’t know that much about Lady Gaga , other than what she has presented to her fans. Had no idea she had lupus. She is so young, sorry to hear that, such a difficult disease to deal with. I have a friend who has systemic lupus and has been in and out of chemo for years but it seems to be working. She discovered it after years of bouts with Bronchitis, arthritis. Worse kind to have, and from the comment Ian made it sounds as though that is what LG has and not the one that is affected by sunlight and shows as blotches on the skin. Just a guess. Others may have a better idea that me, I am not familiar with her personal life. Talented girl though. Why is it the ones that are so talented have to search so hard for their soul?

    Reply
  5. Child Of Medusa said on July 9th, 2011 at 5:18 pm

    I’m rather surprised that Gaga is centre stage when Jolie and Pitt are to finally announce their split.

    Reply
  6. Dream said on July 9th, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    Are they?

    Reply
  7. payal said on July 9th, 2011 at 6:11 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:

    WHAT?!?! do you know something?? please tell

    Reply
  8. Patty anne said on July 9th, 2011 at 7:20 pm

    Why oh why do I have this iresistible urge to sing Babba Louuuuuuuuu while looking at that cutie in the photo above? Ay, caramba! wink, wink.

    Reply
  9. rushdog said on July 9th, 2011 at 7:39 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    Really!? Well I’m ready to just sit back and watch whatever happens. My fingers are crossed. I bet he’ll have something if it comes to pass. I believe Ian has known what’s going on all along but is ready to move away from them or at least infuse this site with some other celebs rather than just the two of them. The “puzzle” is/was entertaining to me. IMO he would prefer this to be a book driven site. jmo.

    Reply
  10. rushdog said on July 9th, 2011 at 7:40 pm

    @Patty anne:
    “sing Babba Louuuuuuuuu” – omg, the image. Hilarious!

    Reply
  11. Dream said on July 9th, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    @rushdog:
    lol if learn half as much about other celebs as i have the jp’s and jen i will be fascinated.

    Reply
  12. Guest2 said on July 9th, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    Although I think Gaga is talented I am not a fan . I don’t like her or enjoy her music but she is popular enough that Ian’s book will do well and I wish him a lot of success. I think Rushdog is right about Ian wanting to move away from brangie and bring in other celeb stories. It really is kind of amazing that they have generated so much interest on this site and for such a long time. We just can’t get enough of them. I wonder if that will change when they finally do break up and move on with their lives.

    Reply
  13. Guest2 said on July 9th, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    @Guest2:
    I forgot to thank Ian for changing the picture. This new one is much nicer to look at!

    Reply
  14. rushdog said on July 9th, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    @Guest2:
    I’ve had the impression that many of us came to this site because we generally agree on what we think of Brangie and, for the most part, have been able to continue discussions respectfully even if we didn’t always agree. I really think the riddle format, as frustrating as it can be at times, drew some of us back to the site more frequently than if the information was just posted straight-forward. Smart move on Ian’s part.

    Reply
  15. Up the Coast said on July 9th, 2011 at 9:55 pm

    Hey Ian….those are some big bongos you have there!

    Reply
  16. Guest2 said on July 9th, 2011 at 10:21 pm

    @rushdog:
    I agree with what you’ve said. The riddles have been fun and challenging and the posters here are endlessly funny and intelligent and it’s enjoyable to read the comments and add my own. That is a big part of why I spend so much time here (too much!). I really was just commenting generally on the fascination with brangelina and jen. It’s not just here but on any celeb gossip site. The discussion board at FF has an entire section dedicated to them . People are so passionate about their views on them to the point where they attack those whoi don’t agree with them. I really don’t see it with other celebrities. For me, I look forward to the clues and riddles just to try to figure out what is going on with them. I don’t really know why I care about it and I don’t have that kind of interest in any other celebrities.

    Reply
  17. Guest2 said on July 9th, 2011 at 10:22 pm

    @Guest2:
    Excuse typos….

    Reply
  18. rushdog said on July 9th, 2011 at 10:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    Yeah, I don’t understand the passionate posting that can take place in the extreme on both sides. I believe some things strongly in this case but I’d never describe it as passionate. Some of the fandom with celebs is beyond me.

    Reply
  19. angelooney Whoreley said on July 10th, 2011 at 2:07 am

    you feel for these people ……. because they sold their children to you ……….. just pictures of course ……. but still sold …….. bought and paid for …………. priced …….. packaged ……. and sold ……….. what other celebrity has done that ???? when brad and angie were offered 14 million ……… for some pictures ……….. it occurred to noone ???? …………. that some things are priceless ……. and should never ever be sold …….. no matter what is done with profits ………. the ends dont justify the means ……….. but they whine …… “oh no their are paparazzis everywhere ” ………. then dont become a public figure ……… or just give all the money back ……….. nobody will care anymore then …….. viola ……. privacy

    Reply
  20. angelooney Whoreley said on July 10th, 2011 at 2:09 am

    i care more about the kids and jennifer ……. more than either skankalina or pittiful

    Reply
  21. angelooney Whoreley said on July 10th, 2011 at 2:14 am

    can you imagine how many sick pedos are fasinated with the pitt kids just because pictures are so plentiful. dont pretend their not out there ……… thats your first mistake

    Reply
  22. angelooney Whoreley said on July 10th, 2011 at 2:21 am

    as far as casey anthony goes ………….. oh god ……….. i agree it is better for a guilty person to go free rather than a innocent person being convicted …….. but did it have to be this guilty person ????? …….. the prosacution did not prove its case ……. i kept waiting and waiting ……… for them to spill their guts …… and then they rested ?????? what ???? your done??? ……….. you have no more info ?????? ……….. hello ………. i know she did it ……… everybody knows she did it ……….. she did it in some form …………. i hope caylee just went to sleep ………… casey will live in fear forever ……… she is a prisoner of her own face ……… caylee is sitting on the knee of the lord right now tattling all about what a bad mommy casey was ………… and the lord is listening carefully ………… rip caylee

    Reply
  23. Guest2 said on July 10th, 2011 at 1:02 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    The pedos are out there all right. It’s always my biggest fear with the children in my own family when they were young. The JP children’s pictures are all over the internet and so are Suri Cruise’s, the Affleck girls, the children of Halle Berri, Jessica Alba, Gwen Stefani and others. The JP’s are the only ones that sell their kids’ pictures but the others are guilty too of inviting the paps. I think it’s time for the laws to be changed so that paps can’t follow or take pictures of celebrity children without the explicit written permission of their parents. I know that some celeb parents call the paps but still, they shouldn’t be allowed near schools or parks where children are. The children should be off limits.

    Reply
  24. Patty anne said on July 10th, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    LOL@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  25. Tamara said on July 10th, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    I think this woman at change.org has turned her anger into something positive. Here is the petition and change is the website if you’d like to sign the petition – it’s a great way to get involved dontcha think??

    Create Caylee’s Law, Not Reporting Child’s Disappearance Should Be a Felony

    Greetings,

    On July 5, 2011, at 1:15 pm CST, Casey Anthony was found not guilty of first degree murder in the death of her daughter Caylee Anthony. The only charges she now faces are four counts of falsifying police reports, each of which only carries a 1 year prison term. Since she has been in jail since August 2008, she will be out of jail ENTIRELY too soon.

    I’m writing to propose that a new law be put into effect making it a felony for a parent, legal guardian, or caretaker to not notify law enforcement of the disappearance of a child within 24 hours, so proper steps can be taken to find that child before it’s too late.

    This way there will be no more cases like Casey Anthony’s in the courts, and no more innocent children will have to go without justice.

    The case of Caylee Anthony was tragic, and there is no reason for another case like this one to hit the courts. Let’s do what is necessary to prevent another case like this from happening.

    [Your name]

    Reply
  26. joanne said on July 10th, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    @Tamara:
    That shouldn’t have to be a law. Common decently or worried about the whereabouts of your child should be enough. I use to panic when I didn’t see mine for 5 minutes . This world is insane.

    Reply
  27. joanne said on July 10th, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    I signed it. I guess if we are that dumbed down we need all the help we can get.

    Reply
  28. Up the Coast said on July 10th, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    @joanne:
    That was my thought also…..”Somethings wrong here” :( I cannot believe that there were 9 women on that jury, and none of them understood what it means to be a mother? None of them understand the deep responsibility of that?

    Reply
  29. siska said on July 10th, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    congrat to jen and her co star in HB..its opening for $28,1 M with a good review..and its just cost $35M ..so they do well..can not wait to see it…I hope I can read any review from here..

    Reply
  30. jan said on July 10th, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    Haha. Cute picture.

    So Posh ‘had her baby girl weighing 7.5 pounds’. Scuse me for being myself but she just never looked pregnant to me, and having a pretty healthy size baby at 7.5 pounds… Is anyone thinking what I’m thinking?

    Reply
  31. Dream said on July 10th, 2011 at 8:34 pm

    @jan:
    surrogacy must pay well in hw. mine was 7 5 too and I was huge.

    Reply
  32. Guest2 said on July 10th, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    @jan:
    Here’s a photo of a pregnant Posh taken by her husband. She looks really good (and pregnant):

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/08/victoria-beckham-pregnant_n_893020.html

    Reply
  33. Up the Coast said on July 10th, 2011 at 8:52 pm

    @siska:
    I haven’t seen it yet siska……but I’ve heard two reviews from friends who said it was hilarious and even their husbands liked it :) and thought Jen looked awesome. (that’s not really a big shock) haha.

    Reply
  34. angelooney Whoreley said on July 10th, 2011 at 9:08 pm

    http://www.hollywoodlife.com/2011/07/06/jennifer-aniston-angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-justin-theroux/ ….. look at poll ###

    Reply
  35. jan said on July 10th, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    @Guest2:
    Okay. Thanks for the pic.

    Reply
  36. jan said on July 10th, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    Did you read over at dlisted what mk said about little Posh? Hilarious.

    Reply
  37. Up the Coast said on July 10th, 2011 at 10:39 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    Jen is winning! She looks alive…..not dead.

    Reply
  38. jan said on July 11th, 2011 at 12:08 am

    Jen must live in the gym.
    She looks solid as a rock.

    Reply
  39. mooki said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:37 am

    http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/index.html
    “Dear Ted:
    I recently read that a new biography is being written about Lady Gaga. In this biography it is being alleged that the real reason Gaga wears so many wigs and so much makeup is to cover up her hair loss and rashes. The side effects of her extreme eating disorder. I call shenanigans. After all, we are born this way. What say you?
    —Jenna

    Dear Dangerous Little Monster:
    True, the Lady has slimmed down quite a bit, but girl was donning wigs and face paint long before that. Don’t you think she’d wear something a little tamer, and with more fabric, if she was just trying to hide herself? Nuh-uh honey, Gaga just dances to her own über-catchy soundtrack.”

    Reply
  40. johnq said on July 11th, 2011 at 10:09 am

    HEy Ian have you seen this? Ellen Page outed as bisexual?

    http://www.v-generations.com/v/content/view/215/30/

    Reply
  41. Tamara said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:15 am

    @rushdog:
    Hiya Rush! I have to agree that Ian uses his blog as a barometer to gauge the interest in a certain subject to use as a tool with his publishers so they can determine how many copies a book on a certain celeb might sell – Brangelina case in point! lol I also believe that one day Ian will use this blog to write a book on social media and how it can affect/make or break a celebrity – the passionate like or dislikes of a certain celeb and the sheer dedication the regulars will maintain to defend or defile a celeb. I have been waiting for Ian to write this one for a long time now! lol There was a huge discussion awhile back on whether Gaga was the one having the affair with AJ – I think it was last Oscar season (or the one before) so not surprised to see that this is the book he’s coming out with now. I figured out a long time ago, as have many I think, that this blog is an experiment to Ian and we are his lab rats! hahaha Hope you’re having a great day :)

    Reply
  42. Tamara said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:18 am

    Can’t wait to see Jen on Inside the Actors Studio tonight – 8:00 est.

    Reply
  43. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:20 am

    @mooki:

    I believe the article Ian linked to this site said Gaga’s hair loss and rash were the result of her having Lupus, thus the wigs and makeup to cover this. Makes sense to me.

    Reply
  44. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:24 am

    I’m happy for HRH for this book on Gaga. She is pretty big and it should do well, even though she not my cuppa tea. I wonder if he will ever get back to some resulution on the Madre / MJ daughter thing or if that is being saved for a future book as well. That’s a cliff hanger for sure.

    Reply
  45. angelooney Whoreley said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:37 am

    lady gaga is strange …….. not a fan of her music either …… she reminds me of marilyn mansons bride. what is with all the weird costumes???? ……. is it because her music cant cut the mustard???? ……… when i want music ……… i dont involve halloween ……… cher and liberace were the exception ……… lady gaga is no cher ….. if she has lupus then i feel for her ………. i have heard interviews and she seems intelligent …….. when real musical talent is involved …….. costumes are not neccesary ……… and i am talking about artists …….;… not manufactured pop stars

    Reply
  46. WCKitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:37 am

    My son and his girlfriend saw Horrible Bosses this weekend. His girlfriend said that it was good and she was “lmao.”

    Reply
  47. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:41 am

    @Tamara:

    That’s a good idea for a book Tam, Extreme Fandom. I remember when Ian’s book ‘Brangelina’ first came out, some of the reviews on Amazon were very negative, but the reviewers didn’t even seem to have read the book. It actually wasn’t all that bad to Brange IMO. I suspect the same will happen with the Gaga book. Fake reviews from the Little Monsters saying it’s all lies, lol, even though I’m sure Ian will be fair and give credit to Gaga’s talent and hard work as he gave credit to Brange for some things as well.

    Reply
  48. angelooney Whoreley said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:46 am

    brad paisley ……… kid rock………. nora jones ………… alicia keys ………… christina aguilara(semi manufactured ,,,, but what a voice) ………… jack johnson ……….. STEVIE RAY VAUGHN (hunka hunka burning love) ………… stevie wonder ……. true artists …… and thats just off the top of my head ……… lady gaga gets a book ??? …………. why???? is she gonna tell all the details of all the costumes????? …………. boring …….. is she gonna tell us all about her high school ???? ………… a rule should be if your gonna write a book ………. the subject has to be over forty ………… so you have something to write about …….. give gaga 20 more years …..

    Reply
  49. angelooney Whoreley said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:49 am

    does she play an instrument???? ……….. her voice is not that special ……..

    Reply
  50. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:51 am

    @angelooney Whoreley:

    “when i want music ……… i dont involve halloween…”,hahaha :) I agree with you AW, you notice how all the riduculous costumes some of the new entertainers wear and if not, they are half nakey while on stage. True performers do not need these tricks.

    Reply
  51. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 11:57 am

    @angelooney Whoreley:

    Yep, she plays the Piano. She was accepted to Juilliard at the age of 11 and has written alot of songs for other pop stars. I think she really has her finger on the pulse of youth. She knows the music market and what sells. OK, enough good stuff about Gaga, I still cannot stand her. Here’s a link if you are interested.

    http://www.biography.com/articles/Lady-Gaga-481598

    Reply
  52. Up the Coast said on July 11th, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    They don’t make ‘em like Stevie Ray anymore :cry:

    Reply
  53. Tamara said on July 11th, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    I dont like GagGag as a persona – the meat dress was just too much for me – but her music is okay – and she does play the piano beautifully – her shows are theatre not just music so she’s got her genre. Only time will tell if her music is still around 50 years from now. It must be exhausting to have to constantly up the WOW factor – I mean, just the “what should I wear today” must be exhausting! lol

    Reply
  54. Up the Coast said on July 11th, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    “What should I wear today?” Chicken or fish? :lol: What wine goes with my outfit? :lol:

    Reply
  55. Kate said on July 11th, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    LAB RATS, I do not think IAN would ever disrespect his readers or fans like that. When that was brought up before he was insulted at the suggestion, and rightfully do. I know Ian values the friendship of his readers, we are NOT an experiment to him, and that is not my opinion, it is a fact.

    Reply
  56. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    hahahaha :) Maybe she’s trying to get around to all four food groups.

    Reply
  57. Up the Coast said on July 11th, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    @Kate:
    I don’t know about anyone else……but I do not feel like a rat. Interesting though.

    Reply
  58. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 3:02 pm

    Def do not feel like a rat. Evil Kitties eat rats. jk :) I don’t think the lab rat comment was meant in a bad way. I didn’t take it like that anyway.

    Reply
  59. Evil Kitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    I think Lady Gaga should dress up like a lab rat next. Don’t think she has done that yet. Then there could be a big snake to come and gobble her up on stage. Way to top yourself Gaga.

    Reply
  60. angelooney Whoreley said on July 11th, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    my heart still hurts ………… tear

    Reply
  61. angelooney Whoreley said on July 11th, 2011 at 3:22 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    thats impressive ………. i do like theatre ……….. cabaret is my ALL TIME FAV ……….. the movie too ……… its classic …………

    Reply
  62. Justa Visitor said on July 11th, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    I have Lupus. Was just diagnosed this year after years of wondering what was wrong with me. It is systemic (SLE). I started swelling and throwing up last September. Have had sore and swollen fingers, wrists, and elbows for quite some time. Had protein in my urine – attacking the kidneys. With systemic you can have the rashes and hair loss, too. The medication that I take causes my hair to fall out, so I take vitamins. I don’t know how she functions even with borderline Lupus. I enjoy her music (the new stuff not as much as the The Fame and The Fame Monster. She’s a pretty interesting gal. I’m looking forward to Ian’s book.

    Reply
  63. I'm on the bidet said on July 11th, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    @Justa Visitor:
    Wow that sounds terrible, best of luck in your fight against Lupus!

    Reply
  64. Justa Visitor said on July 11th, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Thanks, a good doctor helps a lot and they are hard to find for this disease. As I said, I don’t know how she is drinking, doping, and going without sleep with this. I can’t believe she is not dead.

    Reply
  65. siska said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:31 pm

    @Tamara:
    hope you tell us the detail..thanks

    Reply
  66. siska said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:32 pm

    @WCKitty:
    so they have good time?

    Reply
  67. siska said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:33 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    love it..I just can not wait to see it..

    Reply
  68. siska said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:34 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    ha..ha..

    Reply
  69. WCKitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:36 pm

    @siska:
    Hi Siska! Yes they totally enjoyed the movie. I also can’t wait to HB. I am actually thinking about going to a drive-in (before they all disappear) to see it since it so warm at night where I live. Did you see what Mel wrote about the movie at her site? :(

    Reply
  70. siska said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:38 pm

    I just read the Now mag form Uk..said that some of her friends first a bit doubt about JTx..think he was with jen for fame..but its so far from the true..cause he is NOT mr.hw..he is a punk heart man with a sensitive poetry lover heart..he also a member of bikie gang,friend with tattoo artist who made jen first tattoo…and he loves dogs..he is totally opposite JM or her other ex ..

    Reply
  71. siska said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:39 pm

    @WCKitty:
    not yet..I will check it out..I just finish watch Bridemaid last night…its funny and warm..do you saw it?..if you do..how do you compare it?

    Reply
  72. siska said on July 11th, 2011 at 7:43 pm

    Lady gaga in sydney now..and they had interview with her..and she said she like to keep her private life private..and she actually studyhow the famous people became famous,,she learn from them..and apply it..mostly about how they are unique,not afraid to show it and be as honest as possible eventhough provoke contraversy..she seem a very smart person..she learn the tricks..

    Reply
  73. Astro said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:09 pm

    I am watching “Aniston’s Inside the Actor’s Studio”. Beautiful, Nice, Funny!!!

    Reply
  74. Astro said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:10 pm

    I am looking for Jtx!!!

    Reply
  75. WCKitty said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:14 pm

    @siska:
    No, I haven’t seen Bridesmaids yet. I plan on it though! :)

    Reply
  76. Up the Coast said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:23 pm

    @Astro:
    What channel, or network is it on?

    Reply
  77. Astro said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Bravo at At&t network!

    Reply
  78. Astro said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:26 pm

    @Astro:
    JTx is almost in front of her at the first row and It is true. Jen sees him time to time!!

    Reply
  79. Astro said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:45 pm

    About Wanderlust, Jen said, everybody is naked, everything is Drug and Rock & Roll. Too funny. I love that woman!!!

    Reply
  80. Up the Coast said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:55 pm

    @Astro:
    Thank You!

    Reply
  81. Guest2 said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    @siska:
    Siska, not sure if you get the Bravo channel in Australia but they are showing Jen’s interview with James Lipton on “Inside the Actors Studio”. It’s a good interview and they show clips from Friends and some of her movies. She’s wearing “the ring” and justin is sitting in the front row with her agent. If you haven’t seen it maybe you can find it on the internet.

    Reply
  82. Guest2 said on July 11th, 2011 at 8:58 pm

    @Guest2:
    I’m not the only one watching it :)

    Reply
  83. Tamara said on July 11th, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    She looks beautiful – I wonder how intimidating that is to sit up there and answer James Lipton. He gets right into it – “Where were you born” – and they’re off and running. Saw JTx sitting in the front row, they panned to him a few times…..she’s so easy to watch, natural and funny. It was good!! :) FAvorite word: Norman, What God Would Say: They let you in?? (or something like that! ) hahaha She is funny

    Reply
  84. French Chick said on July 12th, 2011 at 3:27 am

    I really didn’t like Gaga and her all personna at all …. Until two months ago when I happened to fall in front of her concert on TV.
    She sings live. And dances. And no need for autotune at all with her (a happy change considering how Madonna is singing live, or Katy Perry).
    She has something that others don’t. And her ability to sing LIVE and play LIVE are two qualities I love. Add to that her songs aren’t that bad, when not arranged like on her albums. The live feeling is a lot more nice IMO.

    Reply
  85. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 6:40 am

    @Guest2:
    I didnt have cable..no time..but will look at youtube..thank you..its nice how supported he was to her..

    Reply
  86. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 6:41 am

    @Astro:
    no wonder she fallen to him..naked and all..he..he

    Reply
  87. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 6:43 am

    @Tamara:
    @Guest2:
    @Astro:
    @Up the Coast:
    i am jealous!!!!

    Reply
  88. Guest2 said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:32 am

    @siska:
    Siska, here’s the link to Bravo. It’s different clips from the interview. Not sure if the full intereview is be available.

    http://www.bravotv.com/inside-the-actors-studio/season-17/videos/jennifer-aniston-last-episode-of-friends

    Reply
  89. Tamara said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:41 am

    @Evil Kitty:
    HAHAHA! Thats funny! Okay, not lab rats – didn’t mean to offend and of course I include myself in that caterogry too so talking about myself here – lets say Social Media Experiement then – better?? hahaha :)

    Reply
  90. kliff said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:16 am

    Sorry, I know this has nthing to do with Gaga but Ellen Page outed as bisexual?

    http://www.v-generations.com/v/content/view/219/30/

    Reply
  91. Stella said on July 12th, 2011 at 10:51 am

    @Tamara:

    Do you have proof that we’re a “Social Media Experiment”?

    Reply
  92. payal said on July 12th, 2011 at 10:55 am

    does any body else miss Jen?? all i see now is justin and chelsea and all those a-holes she hangs around with changing her and influencing her. i’ve been watching old Jen stuff and i admit i have gotten teary, i want jen back!!

    i am so ecstatic that is the ultimate woman right now but i feel there is an arrogance from justin and her new friends because they think that jen is only theirs and are diminishing her intelligence and light and i have a feeling things could go bad for jen because of them.

    why did jason batemen all of become her best friend? thinking he is the only one that cares?!? i miss jen what i wouldn’t give to see her, court and coco hanging out again but with these three in the picture i doubt it.

    so jen if you read this please come back, as a fan of yours for the last 12 years now and i have to know if you’re still the same jen we have all loved for the last 17 years and not changed woman i think you are becoming under the influence of your new “friends”

    Reply
  93. WTF said on July 12th, 2011 at 11:32 am

    @payal:
    maybe you’re seeing the REAL Jen – not the version her team presented for years.? HHMM??

    Reply
  94. joanne said on July 12th, 2011 at 11:41 am

    I like the real version better. Bust out of the Doris Day role.

    Reply
  95. Tamara said on July 12th, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    @Stella:
    :) Noo! I am depending on circumstantial evidence! JMO And for the record, I’m not dissing Ian in any way – I think it would be a fascinating subject for a book and the climate seems to be ready for it. I hope he DOES do it. If he HASN’T thought about it which I would find miraculous, than maybe he should. Again, jmo. Ian is a journalist, he has gone undercover many times for research on his books, why would it be such a stretch to think that Ian is using this blog for material? How would that be such a stretch of the imagination? Even if he’s denied it in the past – that too makes perfect sense – what kind of undercover agent would tell their subject that they are being investigated? JMO

    Reply
  96. Tamara said on July 12th, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    @WTF:
    Hmmmmm……..

    Reply
  97. Curious said on July 12th, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    Tamraa, Jennifer Aniston has been friends with Jason Bateman since they were 20; 22 years ago. He didnt “suddebly” become her best friend.

    About 2 years ago, he did an interview with Esquire magazine(i think) and he talked about how Jennifer forced him to go to rehab and deal with is alcoholism. He said his wife was basically going to file for divorce because she couldn’t stand his alcoholism anymore and Jenifer begged her not to.

    Do not underestimate Jennifer and Jason’s friendship. If you look at the recent photoshoot you can tell they have a long history together. That is not something that you fake or something that just all of sudden happens.

    Reply
  98. Kate said on July 12th, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    @Stella:

    Don’t worry about this, it is not going to work anyway. Did not work then when the others did it, will not work now, but clever, to a point. There are enough old time posters around that remember this too well.

    Two years ago there were a handful of people that claimed they had read IAN’s manuscript to his Brangelina book, and that it was not really about the Brange, but about all of us here, and how manic were were in our devotions to the teams. They claimed this social media experiment was really the subject of his book, and we were all the little lab rats.

    In the beginning, no one believed them, but they kept banging away at that theory and of course claiming they worked at a publishing house and had seen the proof. Then the posters not only became offended, but paranoid and did not want to post here at all, which is exactly what these people wanted. IAN was putting out story after story on Brangelina, and riddles, and they wanted to shut that down. The intent here is slightly different.

    No one wants to be a experiment , or be used by anyone. IAN made if very clear at that time he would never do such a low thing and use his posters and his words were, “I have the highest respect for my posters” quote.

    If anyone believes this nonsense, just ask IAN if he would use you like that, he will clear up for you. No one likes to be painted as that kind of person either. You can say with a wink and a smile and a praise, drip sugar all over it, but it is still, bullsh*t.

    Reply
  99. Stella said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    @Tamara:

    Ian has his hands way to full to be sitting here watching this particularly “Social Media Experiment” This is just a piece of his life. JMHO.

    Blogs talking about celebrity gossip are a dime a dozen, you can flip to any media blog comment section for that type of info. It would have been done already, if it was profitable.

    Does the media climate need more social media opinion??? I think we have more then enough to handle.

    Now, a community blog that offers help and good caring advice and everyday issues, to marvelous individuals that may need a solution and have each others back, with a splash of gossip…That’s a rare and true find. I think I’m really lucky to have found that and in my book, that’s priceless.

    JMHO.

    Reply
  100. Stella said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate,

    I hear you, we love you and sugar makes me fat!

    xoxoxox :D

    Reply
  101. Tamara said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:18 pm

    I’m not talking about individuals here, I’m talking about a phenomenon and the psychology that keeps poster coming back again and again for any tid bit of information on a celeb, how they will believe virtually anything – and also how social media has impacted the celebs themselves. Don’t sit here and put words in my mouth – I never said anything about Ian and his manuscript from years ago – and I never said he was going to out any of you or create paranoia – I also didn’t say he should write a book detaling all the little blogs out there – that is ridiculous.

    Reply
  102. Kate said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    @Tamara:
    Your words, scroll up :

    “I figured out a long time ago, as have many I think, that this blog is an experiment to Ian and we are his lab rats! hahaha Hope you’re having a great day :)

    Nuff said. Have a nice day.

    Reply
  103. Stella said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:35 pm

    @Tamara:

    I think Dr Drew does the phenomenon and the psychology part…JMO.

    Reply
  104. Tamara said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes………..same thing – this blog is an experiment to Ian – we (being the blog contributors) are his lab rats – why is that so difficult to understand? And why does it have to be something negative? Why wouldn’t that be a fascinating subject? I mean seriously, why is that so threatening to you that you feel you have to tell everyone its bullshit? Do you mean that if Ian did do a book on this phenomeon (and that’s what it IS) he couldn’t still respect his posters?

    Reply
  105. Up the Coast said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    I understand why some people might FEEL like a RAT ;) Especially if they have been caught in rat traps before :)

    Reply
  106. Up the Coast said on July 12th, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    I have been under the impression that the majority of people who keep coming back to Ian’s blog actually enjoy the people here, and enjoy the mental interaction/stimulation. It’s like going to the local bar after work for Happy Hour. It’s not like THIS is some new phenomena, it’s pretty much the same thing, except we are not all sitting in the same place. So why would that be so “interesting”? It wouldn’t.

    Reply
  107. WTF said on July 12th, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    @Tamara:
    no worries Tam, i get what you’re saying. Personally i feel Ian only drops the Brangelina stuff to keep people interested. Remember when he stopped writing about them when his MJ book came out, and the Arnold book…..comments died off. People come here mainly for Brange even if they deny it. And before anyone jumps down my throat and asks why i come…..its because it fascinates me to read the comments and the direction the posts go off in…i browse here and many other pages. And again PERSONALLY i think he has riddles that really mean nothing so he doesn’t get sued when he wants to test his theories out. And frankly some of the directions the posters wander into in their speculation is OUT THERE>

    But i rarely comment anymore….cause i’m not of the same thoughts as most on here. I don’t see anything sinister about Jolie, I don’t find Jen particulary interesting, and Pitt strikes me as dirty and smelly and not very attractive. And i got tired of some of the condescending attitudes of some posters – if Ian has a problem with posters HE should tell them, its his blog.

    JMHO :)

    Reply
  108. Up the Coast said on July 12th, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    Gee…..you sound so much more smarter than the rest of us. Or is it that by putting others down…..it makes you FEEL smarter? ;) Anyway, I’ve heard there are smart bloggers over at ‘Just Jared’ who adore Ange, just like you do :)

    Reply
  109. WTF said on July 12th, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    you were speaking to me? i’m not putting anyone down – i find issue with some posters (Keane) -well known fact her and i butt heads. But thanks for proving my point.

    Reply
  110. Justcurious said on July 12th, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    @WTF:
    Proving what point, and how?

    Reply
  111. angelooney Whoreley said on July 12th, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    i love all my internet friends ………. you never come to my door and ask for money ………

    Reply
  112. WTF said on July 12th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    @Justcurious:
    that if you’re of a different opinion – as Tam stated and as i stated…then you get the whole go away you’re stupid attitude..Whatev

    Reply
  113. angelooney Whoreley said on July 12th, 2011 at 4:29 pm

    I know everybody wanted ME to go away ………… but im like a rash …….. that wont go away ………. with huge blistering pustules ……….. leaking pink fluid ……. resembling pizza ……….. with just cheese ……….. mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm …….pizza

    Reply
  114. WTF said on July 12th, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    you my dear are a force to be reckoned with LOL..everyone loves you ha

    Reply
  115. Tetta said on July 12th, 2011 at 4:51 pm

    @Stella:
    Stella, I like the same book and I´m on the same page.

    Reply
  116. Tetta said on July 12th, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    UTC,see yoy in the “bar” tomorrow. Cheers !

    Reply
  117. Up the Coast said on July 12th, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    @Tetta:
    Okay Tetta :) Be sure to pick up your feet, so the rats don’t nibble on your toes! Cheers!

    Reply
  118. Guest2 said on July 12th, 2011 at 5:53 pm

    The JP twins are three years old today – pics below if anyone wants to look. Brad is in Mexico – I wonder if aj and the kids went with him. Anyone know where jen is?

    http://www.popsugar.com/Knox-Vivienne-Jolie-Pitts-Third-Birthday-9039297

    Reply
  119. Up the Coast said on July 12th, 2011 at 5:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    They grow up so fast!

    Reply
  120. payal said on July 12th, 2011 at 6:06 pm

    @Guest2:

    lol what are you suggesting *wink wink*

    Reply
  121. joanne said on July 12th, 2011 at 6:17 pm

    @Guest2:
    I guess the birthday pics will be out tomorrow?
    The twins seem to be the only ones growing and getting older.

    Reply
  122. Dream said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:05 pm

    @Guest2:
    ha todays my bday I had no idea it was theirs i guess its a small world.

    Reply
  123. Lurker said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:12 pm

    @Guest2:

    Guess you have not been to pop sugar Brad was in Mexico with maddox, Pax and his brother. He boarded a plane and went back to Angie and the other kids. Stop disrecpecting Jen, she is with Justin now. Stopmcreating drama where there is none.

    Reply
  124. Evil Kitty said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:18 pm

    @Dream:

    Happy B Day Dream :)

    Reply
  125. Dream said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:42 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    ty

    Reply
  126. Guest2 said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:56 pm

    @Lurker:
    I wasn’t disrespecting anyone, least of all jen. It was humor, capisce?

    Reply
  127. WCKitty said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:57 pm

    @Dream:
    Happy Birthday Dream!

    Reply
  128. Guest2 said on July 12th, 2011 at 7:58 pm

    @Dream:
    Happy Birthday, Dream. Hope you are having a lovely day.

    Reply
  129. Up the Coast said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:09 pm

    @Dream:
    Happy Birthday Cancer

    Reply
  130. Dream said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:13 pm

    tytyty it’s been a nice day ty. hope ur all enjoying it also.

    Reply
  131. joanne said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    @Dream:
    HB, hope you had a great day.

    Reply
  132. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:21 pm

    @Guest2:
    thank you..but because im from sydney..they didnt allow me..has to be usa..damn it..he..he

    Reply
  133. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    agree with you here..the people that made us stuck in here..not particular just Ian and his riddle.

    Reply
  134. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    @Dream:
    happy birthday..and enjoy be merry..do the crazy stuff ..you are allowed today..he..he

    Reply
  135. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:30 pm

    I watched TMZ yesterday..and they had spot about this man who claim that JA made him homeless..its funny..I think he got thrown out as a extra in the break up cause he became a bit wierd..and it cause him to be homeless?..its something else..he..he

    Reply
  136. Astro said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:33 pm

    @siska:

    I am agreed with Jennifer Hiatus. She need it. It will be a hard time for everybody, especially, for tabloids and all websites whose that enjoys the scandal behind JA.

    Reply
  137. Lurker said on July 12th, 2011 at 8:58 pm

    @Astro:
    No it won’t, all the tabloids stories including the ones here are made up. They will continue to make up stories whether Jen is on hiatus or not.

    Reply
  138. Guest2 said on July 12th, 2011 at 9:05 pm

    @Lurker:
    Not all stories are made up, ask John Edwards if you don’t believe it.

    Reply
  139. Dream said on July 12th, 2011 at 9:11 pm

    ty again for the happy birthdays.

    Reply
  140. Guest2 said on July 12th, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    @siska:
    Sorry it didn’t work but you should be able to find something on you tube soon.

    Reply
  141. Up the Coast said on July 12th, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    ;)

    Reply
  142. Guest2 said on July 12th, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Winkie back at ya. Nite all.

    Reply
  143. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 10:12 pm

    @Astro:
    I hope she still will come out now and then..will miss her

    Reply
  144. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 10:13 pm

    @Guest2:
    yeah…i will wait eagerly..he..he..anyway..I get some of the snip bit..its cool how honest she was about her nose..she admit she fix it..

    Reply
  145. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 10:14 pm

    @Guest2:
    nite..

    Reply
  146. siska said on July 12th, 2011 at 11:00 pm

    @payal:
    jen still with CC..they had lunch with Chelsea last months and on her LA premire of HB..Lisa K and CCox..attend it to..they didnt meet up in the theatre..but at after party..everything fine..CCox,,has plenty of her plate,,she still has her marriage to work it out..
    btw..I read that JTx actually known David A….
    Jen always the same..she might be has her vunerable side when she break up..but mostly she enjoy her time with a wild and dirty humour,,so its not suprise she close with Chelsea..
    She known Sandler,Bateman for 20 years..her friends before and after FRIENDS still on..like Kristin hann and ANdrea ..so no drama..this woman is really grounded..so dont worry too much about her..

    Reply
  147. Tetta said on July 13th, 2011 at 3:31 am

    @Dream A belated congratulation on your birthday. Hope you have sweet dreams now and that you will wake up having a great day today too !

    Reply
  148. guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:09 am

    Hi. Anyone here?

    Reply
  149. payal said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:17 am

    me!!

    Reply
  150. guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:28 am

    @payal:
    Us mag has another brangie wedding story quting multiple sources. Should we take bets as to whether it will really happen? Haha.

    Reply
  151. Lurker said on July 13th, 2011 at 11:10 am

    @guest2:

    I am guessing it may actually happen since he has hinted he would do it if the children want them to. Maddox is the oldest one, I think he is now in a position to realize his parents are not married and want them to. As for the other kids, I think they are too young to know any different.

    Reply
  152. Up the Coast said on July 13th, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    @guest2:
    At this point…..WHO CARES? I don’t believe that the kids care either. Why would they? The only reason they would even know/care is if their mother put it in their little heads. Their parents haven’t taught them any religion, so would they be concerned that it will effect their income taxes? Hahaha, I doubt it. This BS is all Ange, imo. Do they have “friends” who are calling them names for being parented by a couple who are not legally bound? I doubt it, their parents move them around too much to have any friends. The nannies are their only constant friends/caretakers, and they would be fired for saying such a thing. Bottom line….No one cares what these two do anymore…….EXCEPT if they break up :(

    Reply
  153. Astro said on July 13th, 2011 at 12:34 pm

    @guest2:

    I believe this news. I have told you several times. Of course, the typical answer here is: Fake Wedding. Poor Ian and his sources!!!

    Reply
  154. rushdog said on July 13th, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I agree with you on this UTC. Let’s drum up a little pr attention as the third “royal” wedding (although I don’t know who would want to associate themselves in any way to the Monaco nuptuals, ugh). Someone’s putting it out again for a reason, maybe because there’s a lull in their media attention. Btw, I think that US mag cover pic is from TIFF in 2007 when she was allegedly stumbling around.

    IAN, any updated information in this area. I mean how do you go from what appeared consistently in many photos to be unkept, unhappy people to getting married w/in a few months. I thought he was so miserable.

    Reply
  155. angelooney Whoreley said on July 13th, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    why is angie so happy to leave malta???? ……….. i thought it was to have dinner with wills and catherine in santa barbara …………. i guess angie did not get a invite to that either ……… or maybe it was to show the world that she is a happy camper so there is no way brad could be fooling around with the beautiful girl on set he was photographed (caught) playing “handsies” (kinda like footsies) with ……….. i saw the pic ……… if that was my husband …………. he would be at the emergency dentist………. right now ……….. smile ……. theres the cameras ……… smile big ……… dont cry ……… you wanted to be the girl he cheats on ……. you got him ………. hes not cheating on jennifer anymore ……….. just angie ……… thats awesome …… heres some wedding vows ……… do you take this woman to live with and cheat on until death do you part ….. brad do you promise to cheat on this woman ………. and only this woman ……….. the rest of the days of your life ??? ……. do you promise to lie to her and sneak behind her back and hurt her over and over??? ……… and then when she finds out and flips out ……. brad can say “” you know she is a crazy bitch!!!

    Reply
  156. Astro said on July 13th, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    @rushdog:
    HaHaHa. I am agreed with you at the end part of your comment!!!. Ok, I mean, Does Ian know the date of Fake wedding?…Maybe his sources will be right at this time. HaHaHa.

    Reply
  157. angelooney Whoreley said on July 13th, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    correction ……….. if brad is still alive ……. he can say “you know she is a crazy bitch !!!

    Reply
  158. Togi said on July 13th, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    I love you! lol@angelooney Whoreley:

    Reply
  159. rushdog said on July 13th, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    Lol, royal couples in the news. Jen getting positive press. Can’t be left out! This is competition for media attention.

    “and it would be “intimate and informal,” reports Us. In other words, the total opposite of Pitt’s million-dollar wedding to Jennifer Aniston in 2000″ —- nice dig Ange! Of course it would be the opposite. This is all such BS. I’ll believe it when there’s an official fax and then I’ll eat crow.

    Reply
  160. rushdog said on July 13th, 2011 at 1:30 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    You’re on a roll today. Hilarious!

    Reply
  161. WCKitty said on July 13th, 2011 at 1:49 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    Your posts never fail to make me laugh!!! :)

    Reply
  162. Up the Coast said on July 13th, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    Tellin’ it like it is… :)

    Reply
  163. rushdog said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    @Astro:
    “I mean, Does Ian know the date of Fake wedding?”

    This made me laugh out loud. You’re hilarious too. Hi ya, Astro!

    Reply
  164. Justcurious said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:24 pm

    Fake wedding could mean fake presents. Any ideas?

    Reply
  165. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    @Astro:
    Go back to Ian’s May 30th post where he talks about sham marriages. This is not a new subject, it’s been talked about in the tabs for a long time. As to the exact date (if there really is one) only frick and frack know that. Boy, that viv and knox sure know how to get their way.

    Reply
  166. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:40 pm

    @Justcurious:
    A set of matching silver plated muzzles.

    Reply
  167. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:42 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I’m sorry but I think I still care a little tiny bit.

    Reply
  168. Up the Coast said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:45 pm

    @Justcurious:
    Hmmm… IDK, what do you get the couple who “pretend” to have everything?

    Reply
  169. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:47 pm

    @Guest2:
    Why are they still together after all the breakup rumors (IUC and NOTW) and irreparable damage, drugged angie, miserable brad? What changed? I hope I’m wrong but I think there will be a wedding (fake or sham, not sure). I hate them for no other reason than I am still talking about them. Sorry, very rushed at work but had to come here for a quick fix. No, I am not addicted :)

    Reply
  170. I'm on the bidet said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    @Guest2:
    If they do, it will be some kind of ceremony with little or no actual legal standing, most likely a ritual in a country that is neither USA nor France where they have residences. Kind of like the mysterious Cruise-Holmes wedding, that no one can seem to find a marriage certificate for . . .

    Reply
  171. WCKitty said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:53 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    as well as the best at everything. LOL How can you give anything to a couple who represent perfection (gag) :)

    Reply
  172. angelooney Whoreley said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    condoms ………… size??? ……. small ………. sniff

    Reply
  173. angelooney Whoreley said on July 13th, 2011 at 2:59 pm

    help me decide ……. this is important ………. is it billie blood thornton ??? …….. or bloody bob thornton ????? ……….. which is better ???? ………. i cant choose ……….. i like both equally

    Reply
  174. Up the Coast said on July 13th, 2011 at 3:11 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    I like billie blood thornton…BTW, where is he nowadays?

    Reply
  175. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    billie blood but I imagine there were times during his marriage to crazy when he was bloody bob

    Reply
  176. payal said on July 13th, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    Ian may we please have some information on the Brad, Jen and Angelina please?

    Reply
  177. Evil Kitty said on July 13th, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    @payal:

    I second that emotion.

    Reply
  178. rushdog said on July 13th, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Speaking of Tomkat…on the radio yesterday the host was talking about Katie’s interview (I think it’s in In Style mag currently) where she talks about the size of their family being just fine. The radio host then said “…well, I hear she’s re-negotiating her contract…allegedly.” I couldn’t believe he said that on-the-air, had to laugh. I wish the celeb media could have even an hour to speak freely about what they know.

    Bloody BBT for me!

    Reply
  179. joanne said on July 13th, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    I guess the holey one isn’t liking Anistons good press. Didn’t they already have a intimate wedding that wasn’t actually binding?

    Reply
  180. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 5:02 pm

    @rushdog:
    Wouldn’t that be great. All of this is probably common knowledge out on the “street” in HW that no one can talk about publicly for legal reasons. Ian is telling us what he knows in riddles and if it weren’t for you and some of the others we wouldn’t have a clue what he’s talking about. It’s kind of annoying to know they are fake and yet they watch them do all these things to appear real. Maybe that’s their intent (hers anyway). To prove us all wrong. I’m crazy for thinking they give a rat’s a– about what we think, right?

    Reply
  181. Astro said on July 13th, 2011 at 7:13 pm

    @Guest2:
    I was expecting this answer “Fake, Sham, Wedding”, I’m right again!!!. So predictable. Please now, seriously, Tell us the Date!!!, because Ian has the best sources….HaHaHa. Please tell us the Date as a BREAKING NEWS!!!

    Reply
  182. Lurker said on July 13th, 2011 at 7:27 pm

    Haven’t the rags reported their wedding a hundred times since they have been together? If you are to believe they are leaking those stories to the press for attention, you must also believe Jen is calling the tabloids and reported problems in her newfound relationship. Stories about brad, Angie and Jen are the tabloids bread and butter, they sell. They will continue to run them as long as there are people buying them. Those tabloids contradict themselves on a weekly basis. Last week they would have you believe Brad was cheating with a member of his crew, this week they are planning wedding, they would have Brad calling off the wedding by next week.

    Reply
  183. Lurker said on July 13th, 2011 at 7:38 pm

    @Guest2:

    Do you honestly think they are fake. For two people who are faking it they sure like to spend a lot of times together. They could have chosen any amount of excuses to be apart but they seem to be rushing to each other’s side when they have to be away on business. People who have actually met them not those who get their reports from “inside sources” have talked about how much they seem to like to spend time together.

    I believe every relationships have their ups and downs but you work it out. Theirs are not any different. I believe they have six children, they are committed to one another and and committed to work through
    A their problems like any couple would do.

    Reply
  184. joanne said on July 13th, 2011 at 8:09 pm

    Since Pitt brought it up in an interview about the kids wanting them to married makes the headlines a little more believeable, Personally I think they should marry for those kids. So he was either trying to sell his flop movie TOL or they are going to do it. time will tell. Either way, no one seems to care about the jolie pitts movies just their relationship and when they marry they will lose that.

    Reply
  185. siska said on July 13th, 2011 at 8:34 pm

    I truly like to brangie to be married already..so maybe jen will be no more link with them..cause even in his wikipedia..jen name still mention cause she is the only one to be mrs.pitt.
    I think this couple first hook up cause they are in the same page and has a great chemistry..so maybe they have up and down..and I wish they work it out..
    and for jen..i still like to hear and see her news and picture..specially with Jtx..happy..
    so maybe cross finger she didnt hide too much..

    Reply
  186. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    @Lurker:
    I honestly think they are fake people who have lied and contradicted themselves numerous times in the years they’ve been together. I don’t see anything genuine or sincere in either one of them. The children always look unhappy and I see nothing warm or nurturing in the interaction between the parents and children. The kids are like their props. It’s very strange. What the state of their relationship is I have no idea. With all the gossip of them breaking up including the NOTW story they remain together. Whether they really do love each other or are just addicted to the adulation and attention they receive as a couple is anyone’s guess. But it was angie herself who said that fidelity is not important in a relationship. I don’t think people in love talk like that. JMO.

    Reply
  187. Dream said on July 13th, 2011 at 9:55 pm

    @Guest2:
    what she said

    Reply
  188. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    @siska:
    Siska, they’re saying that justin and heidi met for lunch last month. What do you make of that?

    Reply
  189. joanne said on July 13th, 2011 at 9:59 pm

    @Guest2:
    ita

    Reply
  190. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:00 pm

    @Dream:
    Hi dream, feeling a little older? I am :( I’m a little tired tonight so not sure I understand your comment.

    Reply
  191. Lurker said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    Another thing , don’t underestimate children some are very smart and intuitive. Maddox seems to be a bright child I am sure he asks a lot of questions as all kids his age do. I am thinking he may be asking why they are not married or why there are no wedding pictures on their mantle just like my friend’s five year old ask her mom. I also agree with the poster up-thread if it is meaning more and more to their children they should do it.

    Reply
  192. Evil Kitty said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    @Guest2:

    I agree too G2.

    Reply
  193. Evil Kitty said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:09 pm

    I can’t imagine any of the kids give a hoot whether they are married or not. Their lifestyle is so unconventional to begin with, so why would they be worried about a conventional thing like marriage? The kids are probably more inclined to want a regular home life and school and to quit being globetrotters, but who knows. BTW I don’t care one way or the other if they do or not get married, cause either way it’s funny. If I were to guess, I would say the marriage talk is for publicity to promote Brad’s movies and the tabs oblige this type of thing.

    Reply
  194. Guest2 said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    If the kids are talking about marriage it’s because someone put it in their little heads. You’re probably right about this being movie promotion talk.

    Reply
  195. siska said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    @Guest2:
    if that true..I think its natural..he really need to talk it out with her to sort out all the rough end of the relation..and I think jen knew about it..she already experince it before and she learn from it..she always maintain friendship with her ex…and by the way this man acts.specially he declare his love to her and didnt afraid to support her in public but never talk publicly..its mean he really has a good relation with jen..he know what jen want..

    Reply
  196. siska said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:44 pm

    @Guest2:
    lainey saying.this is mostly for movie pr..and oscar promo..they did this years a go..talking about married..either way..its good if they really did it for the kid not just for promo..

    Reply
  197. Dream said on July 13th, 2011 at 10:55 pm

    @Guest2:
    lol just agreeing with u.

    Reply
  198. siska said on July 13th, 2011 at 11:12 pm

    @siska:
    plus he might be given her an apartment..cause there are witness saying jen and him looking at the brochure for apartment in NYC..either for JTx or HB..cause jen already bought her..and she like her independece..in her numerous interview specially with Rolling Stone..the early year..she told..that she never want relation basic on money..she want all parties join in the relation basic on love..not cause of money..thats why her divorce is very clean..no drama..

    Reply
  199. siska said on July 13th, 2011 at 11:14 pm

    she never want to codependence on man..she didnt want to be like her mum..who crumbling down and bitter cause of her dad leaved her when she didnt have any income (her mum is a house wife)

    Reply
  200. angelooney Whoreley said on July 13th, 2011 at 11:37 pm

    its more like bradley is rushing to the latest bumfucknowhere place that crazybabymamma has flown with his kids……… wait for me crazy woman ………….. warzone ? sure …… lets take the babies ………. what ??? the kids have no friends???? ……….. mom doesnt either …….. put on your sisters clothes …….. is mom still alive ……….. wheres a nanny ….. im horny ……..

    Reply
  201. checkmate said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:06 am

    well if BP & AJ marry, interest in their relationship will be boring. no more connection to jen, then finally she will be free from them and all can FINALLY live their seperate lives and people will see by the TOTALLY different lifestyles pitt and aniston have taken, they were not compatible in the long run.

    Reply
  202. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 7:04 am

    Angie, Shiloh and Zahara are back in LA from where? Didn’t they leave Malta last week? And I thought they only flew in private planes. Another staged photo op. These kids spend more time in planes, hotels and rented houses than they do in their own home. If they really cared about the kids they’d stop dragging them around the world, put them in school and let them socialize and make friends.
    http://www.x17online.com/celebrities/angelina_jolie/angelina_jolie_and_her_darling_daughters_shiloh_zahara_lax_airport_wedding_brad_pitt_071311.php

    Reply
  203. Child Of Medusa said on July 14th, 2011 at 7:54 am

    Jolie is throwing out the wedding rumour AGAIN (yawn) because she wants to show public unity. They are publically splitting very soon, she is hanging on to her “big Hollywood time” as long as she can.

    The phone hacking bomb has exploded. She never expected this huge scandal. Now the world knows her and Pitt are over. She must give the public more credit, they are not stupid. The newspapers hacked everyone from Royality to murder victims and now we here 9-11 victims – are we supposed to believe they were simply lying about about Jolie and Pitt – lol

    Why do you think they sued?????? Is it because it’s a fake story as they claimed?, because if that was the case they would have to sue trashy magazines everyday of the week! lol

    They are over, watch and wait.

    Reply
  204. Child Of Medusa said on July 14th, 2011 at 7:57 am

    Jolie is throwing out the wedding rumour AGAIN (yawn) because she wants to show public unity. They are publically splitting very soon, she is hanging on to her “big Hollywood time” as long as she can.

    The phone hacking bomb has exploded. She never expected this huge scandal. Now the world knows her and Pitt are over. She must give the public more credit, they are not stupid. The newspapers hacked everyone from Royality to murder victims and now we here 9-11 victims – are we supposed to believe they were simply lying about about Jolie and Pitt – lol

    Why do you think they sued?????? Is it because it’s a fake story as they claimed?, because if that was the case they would have to sue trashy magazines everyday of the week! lol

    They are over, watch and wait. It won’t be long

    Reply
  205. payal said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:03 am

    hey child of medusa, any general estimation as when they will publically announce the split, one month, tow months etc??

    and do you know what they are going to do next? thank for the info

    Reply
  206. elby said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:40 am

    @Guest2:
    Ironic that Shiloh is wearing a Rolling Stones shirt?

    Reply
  207. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:55 am

    @elby:
    Good catch, didn’t see that. Maybe jagger is shiloh’s real father?? JK :)

    Reply
  208. Renee said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:58 am

    If they have been over since 2010, what would trigger a so called break up now?

    Reply
  209. joanne said on July 14th, 2011 at 9:45 am

    I hope they marry and go away. We need a new King and Queen for the ragmags, these two are predicable , haggard looking and boring. I like the IUC riddles more that the happy couple.

    Reply
  210. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 10:16 am

    @Child Of Medusa:
    I’d like to believe that what you say is true but with these two one never knows what the truth is. They’ve been on the verge of splitting for so long and yet they still appear as the happy couple: NOLA, Cannes, Malta. They are such phonies but they continue the charade. For what reason?

    Reply
  211. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 10:22 am

    @Guest2:

    Thanks for this link. Shiloh is stunning, missing tooth and all. Jolie is as usual, dressed in funeral black, looking like a scarecrow with that claw of a hand of hers grasping Shi. So if Brad was in Mexico and she has the girls in Europe, I wonder where the twins are.

    Reply
  212. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 10:27 am

    @Child Of Medusa:

    Hey COM. Wow, if this is the case, they really do carry on one hell of a charade. I would guess that maybe they want to do Brad’s movie promos before they split to keep up the family image. If so, I wonder if they will wait until after the oscar noms, before making an announcement.

    Reply
  213. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 10:30 am

    @joanne:

    haha, when even the loons are more interesting than the so called King and Queen of HW, you know they need to shake things up. At least the loons make me laugh, as well as the tabs and gossip sites for what they come up with.

    Reply
  214. joanne said on July 14th, 2011 at 10:46 am

    @Evil Kitty:
    The loons do make it fun. They are losing their touch too. The insults are starting to lack,

    Reply
  215. WCKitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    So she wasn’t in Mexico with Brad, the man playing with Maddox and Pax in the water was a bodyguard (not Doug) according to a mag, and yes who has the twins? They are purposely stirring up confusion. And yes the loons are a great source of entertainment, especially one of them over at FF. :)

    Reply
  216. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:16 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    If they’re lucky, they are just rent-a-kids and they gave them back to their real parents. Wasn’t that suggested here a while back? But I’m afraid no such luck for those poor kids.

    Reply
  217. angelooney Whoreley said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    okay ………. i got new virus protection ………. so i ventured over to female first ……….. lurking only ……. that place is a freaking riot! …………. they dont even refer to angelina by name ……….. just “the ho” …………… kinda anti brad too ……….. (brad pittstains ……… is that funny??? ) ,…………. jennifer is having a rockin year ……….. decade of hotness (her hotness melted my ice cold heart) ………….. hit movie now and a few months ago ………. SHE LOOKS FANTASTIC !!!!!!!!! ….( dont ever do anything to your face jen please!!!!!!!))) ………….. a star on the blvd ………… hands in cement at graumans ………… a new rocking boyfriend (okay)………… everything is golden for jen right now …………. and angies pissed ……… so SHE is releasing the wedding rumors?????? ………… i would believe that ………. is angie gearing up to be the victim???……….. for once …… she is usually the suspect ………….

    Reply
  218. angelooney Whoreley said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    its getting harder for even the loons to believe her bullshite …………. you really want to ……. but you can’t …….. ive been there ………… i was a loon ……… for a long time ……….. now i am queen

    Reply
  219. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    @Guest2:

    hahaha, yeah I do remember the rent a kid theory, that was funny.

    Reply
  220. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:37 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:

    You were once a loon AW? Glad you on this side of the fence now, but would probably have enjoyed your loon posts as well. :)

    Reply
  221. angelooney Whoreley said on July 14th, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    oh absolutely ……….. gia hackers bone collecter LARA CROFT ………. i was a big fan ……. my daughters were too …….. also a fan of “friends” too ……….. i got pissed because i thought she was a wild child with a heart of gold ……….. kinda like a biker chick who can kick ass but very loveable and likeable ………. then ….. meet my brother and watch me ruin HIS career ………… ewwwww ……… billie blood thornton …..ewwwwww ………….. heroin ……..EWWWWWWWWWWWWWW ………. adultery ??? ……….. what ??? …….. brad and jen???? ……… WHAT ??? ……… YOU ARE SO FULL OF SHIT!!!!!!……….. brad would NEVER DO THAT!!!!! ………. what ??? …. phone sex??? …………. a BJ in his trailer …… africa on the beach ???? ……… what ??? ………. a photoshoot with fake kids ??? …….. OMG….. I HATE THAT BITCHWHORE angelina jolie

    Reply
  222. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    @Renee:
    My opinion is that they’ve been over since 2008 (forget 2010!). Something changed in the fall of 2008 and it became very noticeable in photographs, to me at least, and it’s never returned to what it was previous. JMO. What would take so long? There would be the usual adjustment and consideration that any couple would go through (esp. w/children), and then the sorting out of their life. End of 2008 they both had film promotion commitments and then the awards season. After that…imo one of them has “underlying issues” and the other has a “need” to go from one relationship to another w/in short order. Also there’s the business side of their relationship as Sandy said can’t just end but must be dissolved. Then add in the necessary pr plan to help tone down the screaming headlines. Whether we like them or hate them, this is not the usual public couple.

    Reply
  223. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:19 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:

    hahaha, that’s funny AW. I, myself was never a fan of hers, but didn’t have any issue with her until the bro kissing thing. Then when she took up with Brad, I was like, oh well, it’s too bad about him and Jen breaking up, but that’s Hollywood and happens all the time. When I saw Ang on a TV interview saying how she would never have an affair with a married man because her dad did and hurt her mother in that way and that she shouldn’t have to prove herself to America that she is a decent woman, I was like, bitch be lyin. I remember then it wasn’t too long after that she was preg with Shiloh yet her and Brad both denied any shenanigans while on M&M set. From then on I couldn’t stand Brangelina. But yeah, what you said is what alot of former fans say. She really wrecked her fan base and I’m actually surprised she was able to recover career wise. I guess the loon Koolaid is pretty strong stuff though.

    Reply
  224. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    It’s probably impossible to determine exactly how much money people earn off Pitt and Jolie which would be in addition to what they earn off themselves (hope that makes sense). I read that Kris (mom?) Kardashian and her family earned something like $65 million last year for whatever it is that they do. They have the reality show and the sisters are fixtures on the celebrity mags so the earning potential for a high profile celeb must run very deep. So if the Kardashians pulled in $65m consider what P/J could pull in.

    Reply
  225. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    Thanks CoM for stopping in to post and give an update. I’m watching with interest. To me the PR machinations are the most interesting part of all this.

    Yeah they sued because they wanted to control the end and they had a case. There were rumors online at the time that the “agreement info” was obtained by some type of computer hacking. Don’t know the truth but considering who published the information in hind-sight one could conclude it was more than likely obtained through some type of hacking.

    Reply
  226. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    @rushdog:

    Also, 2008 is when the twins were born, so you know they were not going to split before milking that for all it was worth (People mag pics, photo ops, perfect family image), can’t split with that going on. I also agree that they are a brand with alot of people making money off them remaining a couple.

    Reply
  227. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    @Lurker:
    “If you are to believe they are leaking those stories to the press for attention, you must also believe Jen is calling the tabloids and reported problems in her newfound relationship.”

    I have to disagree with this. The same person/team who is leaking wedding stories could also be calling the tabs w/reported problems in Jen’s relationship. A couple of strategically placed phone calls and it’s a month’s worth of tabloid headlines. It’s a very competitive industry.

    I’m not saying that the celeb mags and tabloids don’t recycle this story to sell their publications. I think they do at times. I don’t think it is all one way, but a mixture of invention, recycling, manipulation, one-upsmanship, necessary pr and the list goes on.

    Reply
  228. angelooney Whoreley said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    when brad got all scraggly while in venice ……… it was rumored he had a broken heart …….. from a man ….. wasnt clooney getting with elisabetta at that time??? ……….. do clooney and pitt have a bromance????? …….. did clooney ditch pitt …….. break his heart ……. and get with elisabetta??? …….. because i heard clooney and the italian hottie just broke up???? ……. and he ends up in cancun with pitt??? ……… with angie in london??? …….. are they buttdarting again???? …… angie hates it when brad goes to mexico with clooney……. he rides the hershey highway ……….. turn left at brokeback Blvd.

    Reply
  229. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 2:59 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    “buttdarting” !! Funny. Gotta put that in my slang dictionary!

    Reply
  230. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 3:01 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:

    I always wondered if they were more than friends. An insider poster said that all of Clooney’s GF’s are just beards. BP is looking and acting more and more Nelly these days. I wouldn’t be surprised if he came out.

    Reply
  231. angelooney Whoreley said on July 14th, 2011 at 3:11 pm

    i say 2007 is when it went down the pooper …….. the older very experienced limo driver said anonamously (sp?) ……. ” brad and angie are good kids , something changed in 2007 , i was more concerned for his safety than hers”" ……… can somebody find and post that ……. also keep in mind she had 2 pregnancies and her mom died …… ( giving some slack) ………… this is what changed ……. THEY GOT TO KNOW EACH OTHER!!! ….. usually at this point in the courtship ……… they break up …….. shake hands and go on their merry way ……….. not here ……… THREE FREAKING KIDS !!!!!!! ………. who does that ……….. if you are a fan of brangelina……… this is what i want you to do ………… go outside…… find the first goodlooking stranger you meet …………. and have 6 kids with them ……… ill be back in 5 years …… to see how well its going ……….. good luck with that …………

    Reply
  232. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 3:33 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:

    Six kids in five years is just nuts. Not only for the parents relationship, but for the psychological health of the kids. They had what, a few months to a year to bond with the family, then another kid(s) come along. I could imagine some jealousy there. I also cannot believe BP wanted that big of a family that fast. I think she trapped him with the kids, putting him in a situation where he just has to grin and bear it. If he leaves now, he will look like the jerk. I can’t feel sorry for him though, takes two to tango.

    Reply
  233. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    People Magazine claims Brange not getting married any time soon, but are still open to the idea.

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20509784,00.html

    Reply
  234. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 4:45 pm

    @rushdog:
    Do you think that the change in their relationship occurring the year the twins were born might have something to with the birth of the twins? There’s been so much speculation in many of the earlier clues about surrogates and who fathered them or if they are rent-a-kids that you can’t help but wonder about it. Or maybe it was just the added burden of two more children that broke the back of the relationship. Not that I think it was founded on anything solid to begin with.

    With regard to AW’s commenting on a brad/george hookup it wouldn’t surprise me at all. There are so many rumors about the sexuality of both men that one can’t really discount the possibility. This is why I think there will never be a brad/jen reunion. JMO.

    Reply
  235. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 4:50 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    What a PR game she plays. Feed the rumor to one magazine and when it spreads all over the internet deny it to another mag. Or maybe she started the rumor and he denied it. Keeps us talking about them. It’s strangely fascinating. I guess this is why I’m still interested though I sometimes hate that I am.

    I wish HRH would give us a little update on this with a new picture to get us farther away from that awful gaga picture.

    Reply
  236. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    Too much too soon all used for too much publicity and gain. Need and greed.

    I tend to think it was a combination of things that caused what appeared as a change at least in photos. Adding one newborn into a relationship can add pressure, especially one that is still relatively new. And I agree nothing solid to begin with. But it also has played out at the highest levels of visability publicly and has been used by both of them to sell their films and careers opening it up to public consumption and comment. Initially I think they were riding on newness and emotion, but eventually taking what imo should be special in a personal life and using/selling it for publicity. Moving around every 2-3 months up through at least 2009 with 2 then 3 then 4 then 6 kids in tow. This is what caused me to start watching this. I thought “how difficult are they making this for themselves?”

    As we all do, they made choices about how they were going to move through the world. And Ian posted in one of the riddles from March (?) at some point it all became for show (Tonic Lemon Parade). Each of them, the relationship, the children, the family, the do-gooding – all of it, imo, for show. Constantly under the microscope, and the pressure of career and business deals, each step feeding the beast of their own creation. Then add in substances and a rumored open relationship, not exactly creating something solid.

    I’ve never been on the “Jolie as pure evil” bandwagon. I don’t believe she ever changed her life (maybe she tried and it didn’t take) and I wish I could believe it, but her narrative just doesn’t ring true to me. Personally believe there are some real mental health issues at play and I say that with the seriousness it deserves. I’d actually like to see her hold it together and accomplish something behind the scenes. Have always felt she has talent just not the overblown hype that has been played out in the media in the last six years.

    Having said all that, they’re not the only ones in HW to use their personal life for show. With a fully complicit media as a major player and with the increase in social media in the last five years, this coupling imo just really pushed some boundaries/crossed some lines and I think they’re going to pay a painful price for it in the end, if they haven’t already.

    All of this is just my opinion, of course, on a beautiful Thursday afternoon in the mid-Atlantic of the U.S., simply spectacular!

    Reply
  237. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 5:53 pm

    @Guest2:
    I thought I hit the reply button. That long post was a response to your question. Sorry for the long free association, but got that off my chest for the summer!

    Reply
  238. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    So do you think one of them (her) fed the wedding rumor to US and then the other (him) shot it down in People? It really is a chess game, lol. Remember the post with the MAMS pic of them leaning on each other dressed as assassins? They look like a couple supporting each other in public but in private they really want to assassinate (take that as really can’t stand each other)? That’s what I think.

    Reply
  239. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 6:27 pm

    @rushdog:

    I can def see that happening, that she gave the marriage info. to US and he shot it down through People. Either that or they are in it together just for keeping their names in the spotlight, to show a family image maybe to drum up interest in his movies which are out. Also could be trying to compete with all the good publicity Jen has been getting lately.

    Reply
  240. Evil Kitty said on July 14th, 2011 at 6:37 pm

    @Guest2:

    I agree. Please HRH give us a new pic and clue on the Brange. Pretty please.

    Reply
  241. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 7:31 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    I was just re-reading your your post and noticed the comment about clooney in cancun with brad so I decided to google for pics. I came across these photos from August 2008 when they were promoting Burn After Reading. They look so comfortable in each other’s company, probably just friends but still….

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/27/brad-pitt-and-george-cloo_n_121705.html

    Reply
  242. joanne said on July 14th, 2011 at 7:42 pm

    I just watched a trailer for Moneyball and Pitt looks plastic. :cry:

    Reply
  243. joanne said on July 14th, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    Clooney still looks hot though. :wicked:

    Reply
  244. joanne said on July 14th, 2011 at 7:45 pm

    messed up, darn! :twisted:

    Reply
  245. siska said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:28 pm

    Bp famously saying he want 7 kids..and jen only want 2 or 3 kids,when they still married..,and BOOM.. hooh up with AJ..they had close to 7..
    either because she really love him and just want to provide what he want.or to gain public sympathy and squash the image of homewrecker and made jen the childless ex wife as the blame for the divorce..

    Reply
  246. siska said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:29 pm

    sorry mispelling..he..he

    Reply
  247. siska said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    thats why she is still famous..and her fans base still big..cause she know how to present her image to the gullible public..the charity works which has and worldwide effect..make her star power with global scale..thats why..her movie sell more in overseas..and how the producer still cast her with high salary.

    Reply
  248. siska said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:32 pm

    I wonder if jen in mexico too catch up with her old mates (BP and GC)..she usually went to Cabo for summer holiday

    Reply
  249. bg said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:36 pm

    @Guest2:
    They couldn’t sue NOTW for “lying” about their break-up if they don’t fake a happy family(therefore “proving” it was a lie.) Someone in that trainwreck is thinking…

    Reply
  250. Lurker said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    @WCKitty:

    I don’t know if you were joking or not but the logical conclusion would be Angie was in London with Shi, Zee and the twins while brad was in Mexico with the two older boys. there were pictures of Brad and the boys leaving Mexico so it is safe to assume he is in London with the the two boys and the twins while Angie is in LA with Shi and Zee. no Conspiracy there.

    Reply
  251. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    @siska:
    I think she had the babies to hold onto to him so he wouln’t leave her. She gave him what he wanted but he doesn’t seem very happy about it lately.

    Reply
  252. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 8:57 pm

    @Lurker:
    Shi, Zee…do you know these people personally?

    Reply
  253. joanne said on July 14th, 2011 at 9:38 pm

    They didn’t get to one one another, they kept moving, making movies, going charity things, doing commericals and kept adding kids. I don’t think that is a good receipe for a happy loving family, sounds more like strangers meeting in the night.

    Reply
  254. rushdog said on July 14th, 2011 at 10:21 pm

    @Lurker:
    I’d say they’re co-parenting not running into each other’s arms. Still think when they’re in the same city it’s the opposite side of the mansion.

    Watching with interest to see if Child of M’s posts come to fruition.

    Reply
  255. Guest2 said on July 14th, 2011 at 10:30 pm

    @joanne:
    Yes, pitt definitely looks like he’s had a facelift. He really didn’t have to do it, he’s an attractive man and would have looked good if he’d aged naturally. It would have added character to his face and he’d still get work. I think it’s more difficult for women in HW to get roles as they get older. Even outside of HW the standards are different for men and women in terms of aging. I see it in the workplace that the older women are treated differently than their younger counterparts. It’s a sad fact of life, unfortunately. Sorry to go off on a tangent.

    Reply
  256. angelooney Whoreley said on July 15th, 2011 at 12:32 am

    when william and catherine were in california ……… did they go see jennifers movie???

    Reply
  257. thescoop4u said on July 15th, 2011 at 1:49 am

    The Jolie Pitts sued NOTW for misuse of private information and libel. The libel suit was from the story that was printed. The misuse of private information came from Murdoch getting a copy of the marriage certificate that he was going to print before the lawyers stepped in. They have a confidential marriage license that can only be accessed by Angelina or Pitt without a court order. They are already married and have been since right before Shiloh was born. So much for the gay marriage thing huh?
    Confidential marriage certificates are used all the time to keep just anyone from getting a copy.

    Reply
  258. Kate said on July 15th, 2011 at 1:57 am

    @thescoop4u:
    Hmmmm, well then she would be in a whole lot of trouble with that last adoption eh, considering most countries require one to be married at least 3 years. Is that why they have been hiding it? What possible other reason?

    Reply
  259. thescoop4u said on July 15th, 2011 at 2:05 am

    Jennifer and Justin are a real couple. But I think Jennifer has another horrible friend tagging along. Chelsea is two-faced and a hypocrite. She split up Ted Harbert’s marriage with Susan and they had 2 kids. That’s a Homewrecker if you ask me. Harbert helped get her show then she dumped him.

    Also I have said before that Brad and Angelina knew each other before Mr. and Mrs. Smith. They met at one of Marilyn Mansons parties. What I have heard is that they weren’t messing around then, only doing heroin together. But Brad wanted her for a movie role so he recommended her for the part.

    Reply
  260. thescoop4u said on July 15th, 2011 at 2:12 am

    @Kate:
    Since adoption records are sealed I have no idea how they pulled it off. Jolie adopted as single and Brad adopted later I would assume.

    Reply
  261. thescoop4u said on July 15th, 2011 at 3:54 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Another confidential marriage certificate maybe?

    Reply
  262. anon2 said on July 15th, 2011 at 4:46 am

    JMO!
    Angie gets sore when Brad goes to GC, because GC can press Brad’s “buttons” like AJ cannot!
    Also, GC and BP are opposite types. He’s dark and Brad’s light.
    But something else has transpired. Brad has aged, even with the dyed hair and the botox.
    Furthermore, he’s become more feminine. It isn’t only the peewee thing; it’s also the heavvy pot use. Studies have shown that heavy pot use can cause males to build up estrogen in their systems
    And the persistant talk about his bad body odor, can be traced to the excessive consumption of beer and the use of marijuana.
    And being with AJ seems to have taken away his male star quality. He tried to look more masculine, and it worked, for many people focused on his scraggy look; a masculine look.
    It’s no wonder Angie feels threatened by GC. She, on the one hand, indicates that Brad’s free to be himself
    but she probably means, but doesn’t add, just as long as he’s hers to with as she pleases.

    Reply
  263. Astro said on July 15th, 2011 at 6:29 am

    @thescoop4u:

    So, according to you, Angelina and Brad are already a married couple?.

    Reply
  264. siska said on July 15th, 2011 at 7:15 am

    @Guest2:
    men..they didnt really know what they want until its too late..he..he..

    Reply
  265. Guest2 said on July 15th, 2011 at 7:25 am

    @thescoop4u:
    I’ve wondered for a while if they are already married but I never thought it happened before shiloh was born. If they sued NOTW for libel for the story they printed does it mean the breakup story wasn’t true? I’m also thinking of Ian’s clue about a sham marriage, maybe it’s a sham wedding since they are already married. Have the wedding for publicity and fool the public into thinking they are getting married. Does this mean they aren’t splitting up anytime soon? Are they still doing heroin together?

    As for jen, it’s too bad about chelsea if what you say is true and I don’t doubt it is. You said something similar about courtney cox a while back that she was leaking info about jen’s life because of jealousy. Is justin a decent man?

    By the way, thanks for your posts. They are always interesting to read. Don’t stay away so long.

    Reply
  266. Guest2 said on July 15th, 2011 at 8:10 am

    I did a quick search on confidential marriage certificates. This seems to be a california thing. The certificates can only be accessed by the married individuals or by a court order which are not given out freely. I wonder how NOTW got hold of it. If there was a question about whether an adoption was legal or not I would think a court order could be obtained.

    Reply
  267. Bob said on July 15th, 2011 at 8:50 am

    How about a new post please? I find Lady Gaga and Arnold news very lame. Got any info on someone else? Anyone else? How about Toothy?

    Reply
  268. yes said on July 15th, 2011 at 9:02 am

    N W. hacked Brad, Angelina PHONE SEX 2005
    by guest1200 on Fri Jul 15, 2011 1:31 pm

    #NotW Hackgate EXCLUSIVE: Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie & Jennifer Aniston
    This entry was posted on Friday, July 15th, 2011 at 11:26 am and is filed under Old Media, Rupert ‘The Evil One’ Murdoch.

    Jennifer busted Brad big time!

    rsTrevithick: RT @bloggerheads: #NotW Hackgate EXCLUSIVE: Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie & Jennifer Aniston http://t.co/pLFU5e9 #murdoch #coulson32 minutes ago via web · Reply · View TweetTop
    ——————————————————————————–

    Short version:

    Holy cow! It looks like News of the World ‘hacked’ the phone(s) of Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, and/or Jennifer Aniston!

    “Jennifer got him by the calls”

    The whole articel is at the link about the phone sex

    “Marriage ended over Brad chat with Angelina”

    LIARS LIARS THEY HAD AN AFFAIR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  269. payal said on July 15th, 2011 at 9:22 am

    how about some simon cowell juicy gossip??

    Reply
  270. Dream said on July 15th, 2011 at 9:25 am

    @thescoop4u:
    I had a feeling they were already married. It seemed to me like a watch this hand while the magic act goes on move saying they would not marry till everyone can marry.

    Reply
  271. Guest2 said on July 15th, 2011 at 11:03 am

    It will be interesting to see if anything more will come out about brangie in this whole NOTW scandal. This still remains my favorite topic on this board. HRH, can you shed any light on what thescoop4u has said, please :)

    Reply
  272. Evil Kitty said on July 15th, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    @yes:

    I read the article. Perhaps NOTW obtained the Brange phone sex conversation through wiretapping and instead, just stated in the article that Jen overheard the conversation by picking up another phone and relayed said conversation to a “friend”. The rest of the article seemed standard tab BS, like Jen not wanting to start a family, etc.. I can believe the phone sex part due to the recent scandal of NOTW and how they obtained their info. though illegal phone tapping, so yeah that would mean they were cheating if it’s true. Which makes me wonder if there was some truth to the Jen and Brad text messages.

    Reply
  273. Evil Kitty said on July 15th, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    @thescoop4u:

    So Brange are already legally married? What do you think their next move is going to be? Will they break up soon and never reveal publicly their marriage or will they have a ceremony and pretend they are getting married for the first time? I still don’t understand why they would do that. What benefit would that be other than what Kate mentioned about issues adopting children. I guess I just don’t get why they make things hard for themselves. Anyway, scoop, I always enjoy your posts, ty.

    Reply
  274. Guest1 said on July 15th, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    I think they never announced that they are married because they knew they would get more press keeping the tabloids and public guessing. Amazing how much their lives are revolved around their public image.

    Reply
  275. angelooney Whoreley said on July 15th, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    in brads latest interview he says “”" im out of the box” ……… his last interview “”" if i was gonna do it ….. i was gonna do it big”"” ………… translation from his drunk stoned mind — to the way a sober person might see things ……….. “” im out of the box . my girlfriend is out of her mind. look at my family . we got way too many kids and neither one of us is doing a good job. the nannies are great tho. ………… “”" if i was gonna do it , i was gonna do it big”"” ———– regardless of the toxic envirament that was the day to day reality , the fighting , the constant traveling , mommys drugs , daddys drugs , mommys lovers , daddys lovers , no school, no steady home , my own mamma wants to kick my ass……….. i miss my mamma ………. sniff

    Reply
  276. Curious said on July 15th, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    @thescoop4u:
    I do believe Jennifer and Justin are a real couple. He looks totally smitten. He was definitely hit hard by whatever her charms were. She also looks so into him. That black and white photo of them really shows how happy they are. I hope this is the guy for Jennifer, even if their timeline is sketchy.

    Reply
  277. Curious said on July 15th, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    @thescoop4u:
    What do you think about Justin allegedly meeting with his ex? another tabloid BS?

    Reply
  278. rushdog said on July 15th, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    @thescoop4u:
    This is all really fascinating information. Just absorbing it into the rest and following along. Thanks for the posts. Don’t like CH myself, nothing special w/her. So what exactly was going on with the couple at the end of 2009 and beginning of 2010, it seems there was clearly something strained in that relationship. Could be that they were actually putting together a divorce agreement, finally came to a conclusion and then at the end of the Jan (?) NOTW got the marriage certificate copy which was supposed to remain a secret and shite hit the fan.

    So was Jen at the MM party which would have been pre-2004 or was her husband off doing heroin w/other women all on his own?

    And, regarding the 3/07 adoption, could we conclude either they got special treatment or they lied? Seems so.

    Maybe the wedding cake changed from white to lavendar in the ensuing years, lol! All jmo.

    Reply
  279. Guest1 said on July 15th, 2011 at 3:00 pm

    So, is Ian still chasing Gaga?

    Reply
  280. Up the Coast said on July 15th, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    IMO, Chelsea is no different than anyone else in showbiz, except that Chelsea is just more honest about it. People do not like her crassness, because they would rather have it sugar coated I suppose. The truth is not pretty and all of our favorite celebs have had to do things they are probably not proud of, on their way to “stardom” ;) Selling yourself, is still selling yourself, no matter how big a bow you put on it.

    Reply
  281. Up the Coast said on July 15th, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    @Guest1:
    She can’t be that hard to chase down, not with those stupid shoes she wears :roll:

    Reply
  282. joanne said on July 15th, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I agree.

    Reply
  283. Dream said on July 15th, 2011 at 5:59 pm

    okay one more guess on the just cause i didn’t tell u i had a child clue. i keep trying to fit it in with angie or jen, is it brad instead? as in the jp’s are married and he has adopted the kids and has not said so publicly?

    Reply
  284. justcurious said on July 15th, 2011 at 6:24 pm

    What is the loonies’ take on the marriage?
    What is the gay community reaction about Brad’s magnanimous statement re: gay marriage, now that he went and got married? (If he did).
    If they had already married, why didn’t they tell the children? If they did, why did the kids keep asking them to get married?
    Is His Highness prepping part 2 of “Brangelina”?

    Reply
  285. justcurious said on July 15th, 2011 at 6:28 pm

    Gay-arranged marriages are as old as Hollywood. Why would Brangelina ferociously fake it?

    Reply
  286. Evil Kitty said on July 15th, 2011 at 6:40 pm

    JLo and Skeletor are divorcing.

    http://www.dlisted.com/2011/07/15/jlo-and-skeletor-are-getting-divorce#comments

    Reply
  287. Patty anne said on July 15th, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    I’d read that JLo discovered that Marc Anthony was boinking some of his back up dancers. Not good for her hot mamma, sex symbol image I guess. @Evil Kitty:

    Reply
  288. Evil Kitty said on July 15th, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    @Patty anne:

    There was a CDAN reveal of him stepping out on her too.

    Reply
  289. Kate said on July 15th, 2011 at 6:59 pm

    I now this marriage issue was brought up back in 2009, and it was decided that the marriage was not real. We often hear other stars refer to her as his wife, and so I can imagine that fuels it a bit. Brad has been quite indignant about being judged by a Pastor for not being married and launched “reared up against God” is that what his friends said. He has been pretty outspoken about not being married, as she has. I would imagine her adopting Pax as a single mom while married and lying on a state department document would be a crime and one not taken lightly. Hard to imagine why they would take that chance. Vietnam may or may not have had the 3 year rule, can’t tell now, they are not doing international adoptions from what I can tell, doe anyone else know? The way the rules read though it does not appear they required 3 years. So why lie and commit federal crime by lying on the adoption papers. of course they are actors, and arrogant so but she sure had me fooled with, “ask Brad” lol when Ann Curry asked her when they were getting married and when his turn came he ducked the camera, they turned it off ,and we got the standard answer…kids.

    In addition to that, their Federal taxes would define if they were married. Married filing joint, or married filing separate. I would venture a guess that IAN has done some research on their finances and would have some idea if they have are tied together or not. If they are indeed legally married already that would sense as to why they would stage a fake wedding, it would definitely make explaining a divorce easier. lol

    How long do you think they would have to wait, six months, a year…what a web of lies..would Trevor align himself with them under these conditions? I wonder. Is this why no more CG???

    Scoop, would you be willing to share with us how you found this out? Will this information come out in the investigation that is going on now?. Smoking Gun exposes legal documents all the time, but they of course do not obtain them illegally. They did however post a cease and desist letter from Brads lawyers that specifically warned them not to make public, to which they did so promptly. Bravo. Tiari Henson sat in her interview and told the world they had a open relationship and saw other people and that is why it worked. When she realized what she had done she tried to put Jeanne back in the bottle. No one can ever put Jeanne back . lol

    How would he have gotten the marriage certificate? He would have had to bribe someone, right? Wouldn’t that fall under criminal investigations? Or did they just leaving laying around the bedroom of his home?

    I would really kind love for this to be true and them to be outed, imagine the backlash. wow.

    Fake wedding, fake honeymoon, fake separation, real divorce. maybe that is what the papers were about when NOTW announced their split in 2010, it was dividing their assets, because they were married, and it has taken them this long to figure out how to get out of the web of lies they have created. She did look pretty grim in that blue knit dress.

    Lying on a state department document? is that the number 11?

    Ian?

    Reply
  290. Dream said on July 15th, 2011 at 7:24 pm

    @Kate:

    LOl And I am so proud when I manage to connect two things and make some kind of guess. Your thoughts are always amazing, I find your whole thought process fascinating. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. they always give me so much to think about.

    Reply
  291. Kate said on July 15th, 2011 at 7:38 pm

    Dream, I have no idea either lol, Scoop seems to be certain, Ian said there was going to be a fake wedding, so kind of makes sense yes, how else can they really split up? LOL I thought Ian meant fake wedding as in get married but not really married as in relationship, which I still think he means that because they are not intimate imo, and at the end of the game it would makes sense that they are probably living separate lives..this sort of adds another dimension to the whole thing doesn’t it, and why they keep denying they getting married, maybe not ready to split, although I would think they would have to stay together for awhile in this mess before filing for divorce. That would not reflect well, get married for the kids and then file for divorce a year late. Maybe it does not make sense. Nothing about them does. Maybe Scoop will share some more. At the same time it also makes no sense as Rush said for Brad to marry her when just in Feb he was miserable and wanted to shed some extra pounds and was suppose to be changing his entire life. It seems to go from one extreme to another.

    Reply
  292. Dream said on July 15th, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    @Kate:
    They never seem happy together or apart. The only time Brad has appeared happy is in the pics of him with his on set assistant or with George Clooney. And I don’t jsut mean smiling I am talking body language. In the mentioned pics his whole body seemed relaxed and at peace, you so seldom see him like that. And Angie is the same with the kids and Brad, She looks tense. When theya re not around she seems more relaxed.
    That whole family seems unhappy to me. I know that paps can be upsetting to anyone, but the JP children ahve been surrounded by cameras all their life. I can’t believe theya re that upset by them adn if theya re their parents need to do some parenting.
    I don’t get the unhappy there. If everyone is so miserable do something. What ever it takes. Quit work adn live simpler if taht is what it takes.
    I jsut find it weird and sad taht with all their money and fame and wonderful kids they don’t seem as happy as the average person you would meet on the street.
    Sorry didn’t fix all my typos being lazy today.

    Reply
  293. rushdog said on July 15th, 2011 at 9:42 pm

    @Kate:
    “Will this information come out in the investigation that is going on now?”

    Kate, what investigation? There’s been some thoughts put on this board, including a riddle guess from myself, but I was of the mind that it was at most speculation by certain posters who are a bit closers to the scene. Do you know something for certain or is that comment drawn from something written here?

    Reply
  294. Kate said on July 16th, 2011 at 2:05 am

    @rushdog:

    Hi Rush, I don’t know of investigation that is just focused on Brange, I was just commenting in regards to the entire investigation on Murdoch and all those connected to him. I can not quite wrap my mind around first this confidential marriage certificate and how Murdoch would have possibly gotten a copy of it. He would have needed a court order, so it is not a matter of wiretapping, if he had a copy he had to bribe someone to get it. They would have had to get married in the county they obtained it, before Shiloh was born apparently, and they were in Paris and then on to Africa. It was the first week of Dec 05 that they announced he had started the adoption process for Maddox and Zahara. Would that be the reason for a confidential marriage certificate? They could have gotten a copy immediately , but would have had to state they had been living together already, which they were. I still do not see the point of lying about it for six years and how Murdoch could possibly have gotten it.

    Just a note on how to get one:

    This marriage license is a confidential record and is registered at the County Clerk’s Office in the county where it was purchased. Only the marriage partners may purchase copies of the marriage license and must present valid picture identification together with the required fee to the County Clerk in order to do so. Persons other than the marriage partners requesting copies of a confidential marriage license may only do so by presenting a court order to the County Clerk in the county where the license is registered.
    This license is not open for public viewing & it takes the marriage partners or a Court Order to get a copy of it.

    So did he forge a court order? lol I dunno, maybe they are married, but I just can’t imagine why, and how anyone saw it if they did not show it to them, unless they were the notary that issued it to them.

    In mid Dec after he filed to have their names changed to his, there were reports they were looking at rings in Los Angeles. On Dec 18 there were 2 of their friends that said they would be married by the end of the year, US Weekly reported that. lol.

    They headed on to Paris after the early 2006, then on to where Shiloh was born, he was in London first week Feb or late Jan where they had dinner with Jamie Oliver and there was a rumor of them getting married..

    So, did they get married before Shiloh was married and then create this massive web of lies for PR for the next six years? IF so, that is disgraceful considering all the posturing they did about gay marriage.

    Reply
  295. Kate said on July 16th, 2011 at 2:08 am

    Shiloh was born, sorry, it is late, tired. :)

    Reply
  296. Guest2 said on July 16th, 2011 at 6:58 am

    @Kate:
    The only reason I could see them getting married back then might be pressure from Brad’s family to marry so that the baby wouldn’t be born illegitimate. I can’t imagine why they would keep it secret all these years. But then I don’t understand why a pregnant angie traveled so far from home to give birth to her children unless they had something to hide. Lots of secrets in that relationship.

    As for the marriage license maybe they kept it in their home and one of their employees (the bodyguard or nanny) found it and sold a copy to NOTW. I wonder if any of their employees was fired back around that time. Would have to do some googling (not good at it) or maybe wait for someone at FF to do it. Someone there posted a link to a NOTW story from Jan. 2005 that jen caught brad and angie having phone sex and that’s what ended the marriage. They also referred to an interview jen gave to People mag in April 2004 where she shot down rumors of an on set romance between b/a.

    Reply
  297. angelooney Whoreley said on July 16th, 2011 at 8:29 am

    okay ………..these are my educated guesses …….. brad and angie broke up during the filming of salt …….. thats when all the waytoosweet interviews started ( that was when angie herself realized , hes leaving) …. so she started saying …”brad knows me completely just as i am ” (gagme) …… that was for jennifers benefit …… that was angie peeing all over brad ……. reminding jen of all the crap brad has done …….. to keep her away ……. and to keep him ……. jen is with justin now so if brad has some breaking up to do…… now would be a good time ……… you better not leave them kids though ……….. angie says were getting married were getting married ……… brad says …… no were not

    Reply
  298. angelooney Whoreley said on July 16th, 2011 at 9:19 am

    i wish i could quit ya ……..

    Reply
  299. angelooney Whoreley said on July 16th, 2011 at 9:25 am

    okay ……. let me get this straight ……….. correction the dinner with william and catherine was not in santa berbara …………. it was in ………. DOWNTOWN LA ………. and angie did not go???? …….. was she really not invited ???? …… thats a shabby way to treat the queen of hollywood ………… i thought catherine was a huge triangle fan …….. obsessed with dogooder angie ……….. i heard that during their US visit they went and saw horrible bosses ……. is that true ??? ……. i also read that she will never be welcome because williams life was devastated by his fathers cheating ………….. so there will be no smoozing with the MOST FAMOUS CHEATERS IN THE WORLD ………..

    Reply
  300. siska said on July 16th, 2011 at 11:33 am

    national E plus celebitchy..saying about JM want jen back ..he sent her text,flower,poem..
    plus in Celebitchy..there are pictures of JM ..he definetely gain weight..looking not so sharp..

    Reply
  301. siska said on July 16th, 2011 at 11:34 am

    Jlo and MA..is an example how the famous can trick us..by pretend to be in love just week before..and suddenly divorce..

    Reply
  302. Child Of Medusa said on July 16th, 2011 at 12:20 pm

    @Evil Kitty:

    And you do realise that Pitt always has a beauty waiting in the wings????

    Just take look at his pattern of relationships – hmmm this may all get very messy indeed!

    Reply
  303. Child Of Medusa said on July 16th, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    @Guest2:

    Well, look at their past relationships, go way back. Now, think how Hollyweird celebrates marriage for celebrity/publicity reasons. There are no soul mate/love of my life relationship rubbish – thats just what they feed you, it’s mostly all fabricated – as you and others here know.

    Jolie/Pitt were heavily criticized for the breakdown of Jen and Brads marriage (which ended because of the denied affair) and crucified for the way they paraded one another around so quickly after Jen/Brad separation.

    They jumped in head first acquiring SIX kids in THREE years, hired nannies and orchestrated the biggest hollyweird show ever. Playing happy families, trying to convince the world they are totally committed, totally in love and soul mates and whatever… How she gave Pitt everything he wanted – because Aniston wouldn’t, how Jolie is the love of his life and misunderstood, trying to project a picture of perfect happiness. Mother earth has blessed the planet with her greatness and if we can’t or don’t worship her – we should all at least strive to be like her. The amount of work that was involved in this blockbuster has exhausted them both.

    Jolie is desperate to cling to Pitt to keep the life she has lived while with him. She doesn’t want to lose the “goddess” title because she has tried so hard to convince us she is now grown -up, no longer needs women, doesn’t drink blood and doesn’t have kinky sex anymore and – yawn. The only thing holding her together is the fake life her and Pitt have made together. Jolie fears for the future and is scared she will return to her old ways. If Pitt dumps her on the ass with six kids will make it make her fears inevitable.

    Pitt is hugely concerned with his public image and can’t walk out on his family – so he wants Jolie to start performing badly so him and the kids look like victims of Jolie’s narcissistic personality. But Jolie – albeit mental – is far too clever for Pitt and is continuing with the show. She has worked too hard on her image and wants Pitt to look like the bad guy. They also fear a public crucifixion. The world has been watching them put on a spectacular show, knowing the only people Jolie and Pitt are kidding is, themselves. The terrible poor choices they have made and the fact they are about to drag six innocent children through the dirt with them, makes Jolie and Pitt very tempting flesh for the waiting world.

    The public have known all along it’s a sham.

    The media are waiting to pounce on them like hungry wolves.

    They fear the world awaits to point the finger and their popularity finally crumbles.

    Vanity – The Devil’s favourite sin.

    Reply
  304. angelooney Whoreley said on July 16th, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    wow

    Reply
  305. Up the Coast said on July 16th, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    All that Brad has to do, to see Ange acting badly…..is to fire all the nannies, or at least give them all a month off…..and then invite his parents over for a week or so. Ange’s true colors would soon appear.

    Reply
  306. Evil Kitty said on July 16th, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    Reading COM’s posts make me want to break out the popcorn! Maybe Brad’s waiting in the wings beauty is the brunette assistant from the Z movie set?

    Reply
  307. joanne said on July 16th, 2011 at 4:04 pm

    It might have worked if they knew how to act and looked a bit healthier. They just look like used up shells with everthing vital sucked out of them.

    Reply
  308. Guest2 said on July 16th, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    @Child Of Medusa:
    Wow, you couldn’t have said it any better. When the house of cards finally crumbles I hope they are both exposed for the liars they really are. But somehow, I think pitt will find a way to throw angie under the bus to make himself look good. Just like he did to jen.

    Reply
  309. joanne said on July 16th, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    @Guest2:
    I don’t think Pitt will succeed this time. They both created the Jolie/Pitt circus.

    Reply
  310. Tetta said on July 16th, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    So what we are watching now is who can hold on the longest time. I guess Angelina will win. She has the longest experiance of playing bad games. By now we have heard so many people telling us that it´s over. Ian of course and then some others with “inside information” and now “Child of Medusa”. We must trust them. The question is, what are we waiting for ? Isn´t it time to give it up and let them play their game ? Or are we still here for the pleasure to see who will stumble first ? Or if they have done something illegal ? They don´t deserve our attention any more. But what shall we do instead ?

    Reply
  311. Guest2 said on July 16th, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    @Tetta:
    How can we not watch this play out to the end? It is funny in a way that brad wants out so badly and angie is making it so difficult for him to go. He got off too easy with jen and then tried to sully her reputation to make himself look good, not so with this one and there’s a tiny, tiny part of me that is saying good for angie. Like EK said, bring out the popcorn.

    The truly sad part of this story is the six children. The best that can be hoped for them is that after the split they will get to spend more time with the Pitt family as that is probably the only normalcy they will ever know.

    Reply
  312. Tetta said on July 16th, 2011 at 7:06 pm

    @Guest2:
    Yes, I also will follow the game to the bitter end. If I have followed this story since 2005 I want give up now. I just wanted to point out that most of us here are a bit cracy :)

    Reply
  313. Guest2 said on July 16th, 2011 at 7:11 pm

    @Tetta:
    Just a little bit :)

    Reply
  314. joanne said on July 16th, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    Crazy is ok with me. :razz:

    Reply
  315. Up the Coast said on July 16th, 2011 at 7:57 pm

    What? You say that like it’s a bad thing :lol:

    Reply
  316. Patty anne said on July 16th, 2011 at 8:41 pm

    Dream, don’t forget how euphoric Brad was after the blow-up at Las Felez in Feb I believe. Remember the comments about how joyous he seemed sitting alone at the curb smoking a ciggie? It certainly didn’t last long though, did it?@Dream:

    Reply
  317. angelooney Whoreley said on July 16th, 2011 at 8:44 pm

    in brads mexico interview he said hes “out of the box” ……….. in jennifers interview titled “i love being boss”….. she says “i try to be out of the box” ………. hmmmmmmm

    Reply
  318. Up the Coast said on July 16th, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    How’d they get in the box?

    Reply
  319. angelooney Whoreley said on July 17th, 2011 at 2:15 am

    thats where angie keeps them ……… until they need to be let out to do something that helps her career …..

    Reply
  320. Tetta said on July 17th, 2011 at 7:03 am

    @Up the Coast:
    When I say that we are crazy I mean it in a very positiv way. Whitout being crazy we probably should be complete idiots.
    :)

    Reply
  321. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 7:15 am

    @Tetta:
    I’d rather be crazy than an idiot because people take you more seriously. And crazy people do far more interesting things than idiots (as this story we follow proves).

    Reply
  322. Tetta said on July 17th, 2011 at 7:32 am

    @ Guest2 You are sooooo right !!!!!

    Reply
  323. Dream said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:26 am

    @Guest2:
    Crazy is good.

    Reply
  324. Dream said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:59 am

    @Patty anne:
    Yep Still wonder what happened. Maybe someday we will know. My moneys on Zahara writing a tell all lol.

    Reply
  325. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 10:52 am

    @Dream:
    Yes she will, after her real mom rescues her from the crazy lady who is always having her picture taken!

    Reply
  326. Dream said on July 17th, 2011 at 11:26 am

    @Guest2:
    LOL she seems to have that I don’t care and I take no guff attitude. I always want to hug her when I see her.

    Reply
  327. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 11:35 am

    @Dream:
    She is a real cutie. Remember that picture of the NOLA stroll where she was holding Knox’s hand? That was so endearingly sweet.

    I found this article posted on FF. It is quite funny and so is the picture of angie.

    http://www.sabotagetimes.com/tv-film/brad-and-angelina-to-get-married-because-no-one-fancies-them-anymore/

    Reply
  328. angelooney Whoreley said on July 17th, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    @Guest2:
    that was so funny ……. thank you

    Reply
  329. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    I just read the following over at FF. I don’t know if this is somebody just spreading lies, but if this true, then the Brand is definitely going down!

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/n-w-hacked-brad-angelina-phone-sex-2005-t293328-90.html?sid=314779b6dc74a7e94697147ca8819a95

    Guest wrote:I read that some of the phone tapes are already hitting the internet, some where Pitt and Holie are laughing about Jen being ugly compared to Holie, and then there’s supposedly one where Holie is laughing that Jen can never have children, and that Pitt should dump her. Wow, if this is true, they will be outcasts from now on, even in Hollyweird. Oh yeah, the Pitts is heard saying he hasn’t had sex with Jen in nearly 2 years because she reminds him of a man, the pig should rot in hell.

    Reply
  330. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    @WCKitty:
    The NOTW article from Jan 2005 said that jen caught them having phone sex and that’s what ended the marriage. It didn’t get into the particulars but there was something in there that suggested it had been going on for a long time. Now that we know phones were hacked it’s quite probable this is true. If there really are tapes and they get leaked it will be harmful to pitt’s image even more so than jolie’s I think. Trash talking your wife to your mistress is pretty low and will make him look like the a–h— that I believe he is. For jen’s sake I hope they don’t get leaked but it would be nice to see those two skanks finally crash and burn. JMO.

    Reply
  331. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    @Guest2:
    I also hope that they don’t get leaked for Jen’s sake, but if they do I agree it will hurt pitt more. This same person also posted another piece of conversation over at FF. The poster has been asked to provide a link, but so far hasn’t, so maybe they really haven’t started to be leaked and they are phony or … do they have inside information?

    Reply
  332. joanne said on July 17th, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Now we know why Aniston looks great and glowing. Better sex! One of the best thinks that ever happened to Aniston is Pitt leaving her, Aniston looks great and Jolie looks skinny and haggard.
    Could be why the holey one said something about Pitt being a man.

    Reply
  333. angelooney Whoreley said on July 17th, 2011 at 4:11 pm

    thank you for that awesome link……. i can hear cadley screaming in his mansion “I WAS IN THE POOL I WAS IN THE POOL …… SO I GUESS JEN WASNT A SLUT ………. was she ????? ……… there goes one loon argument out the window ……… call it frigid if you want ……… i call it not letting a dirty boy wash his feet in your sacred temple …….. AND ……. one piece of the goodguybadguy puzzle…. is ……. she probably did have one or two miscarriages in her valient attempt to have his baby ……….. thats how it was discovered that she was unable ……….. and also explains her lack of involvement with coco(which i never understood) ………. i guess a woman could respond by begging to hold every baby she sees ……… or by running away from every baby she sees ………. before i had kids i purposely skipped that aisle in the market ..(not that way) …… soooooo recap ……… is the hidden birth control story bullshite???? …….. or maybe after his cadley ways were discovered she said “no baby for you ” …… good for her ,…….. do the six kids get to see daddy stumbling around drunk???? ……… do the six kids get to smell the smoke from daddys really good bud???? (probably the best marijuana money can buy ,,, nothing but the best for his kids…… sniff”)) ………. what about all the fighting that angelina and brad do in front of the children …..”"” so they can form opinions”"” ………. WHAT ???? ……. THAT IS A QUOTE PEOPLE…….. Jennifer aniston dodged a bullet here …… a big incestuous heroin addicted bloody bullet .. ………. good for her ………. i think we can call it a day …………… TEAM ANISTON WINS ………….. fireworks applause and all the fat ladies singing …. together……….. sniff ……… sniff ………..sniff……..

    Reply
  334. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    I have known a few women who had troubled pregnancies and they in general avoid anything to do with babies. I remember reading an article about former first lady Bush who was claimed to say that she avoided anything to do with babies because the pain was so great. I can only begin to imagine the pain that Jen must have gone through if she truly wanted a baby and had miscarriages. What kind of low-life person would joke about a woman who is having trouble conceiving. As many posters have stated, Jen may have had trouble in the beginning, but if she suspected bradlee was cheating, she probably changed course and concentrated on her career instead. Yep, Jen dodged an ugly bullet! Having to share custody with angieho (gag and yuck!)

    Reply
  335. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    To clarify: Laura Bush before she conceived the twins.

    Reply
  336. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    Thanks for clarifying, I was picturing Barbara saying that after she had the boys :)

    If there was ever a time when jen considered getting back with brad as was suggested by the earlier clues then it’s a good thing it didn’t happen. She dodged a bullet alright. Being a step parent to the children of a drug addicted crazy woman is baggage that I can’t imagine taking on. She doesn’t need it. She’s come a long way since the divorce and has done very well for herself without brad.

    And as for brad saying he didn’t have sex with jen because she reminds him of a man, I find it a little hard to believe because wouldn’t that have turned him on??

    Reply
  337. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 7:10 pm

    @Guest2:
    LOL, I didn’t think of that. In reality though, if we were speaking about figures, Jen is not any since built like a man! Now Jolie’s figure reminds me of a teenage boy (I could go on) and maybe that is why Brad decided she turned him on more! :) Jen has curves, and Jolie doesn’t!

    Reply
  338. Patty anne said on July 17th, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    I agree with you on that guest. In fact one article I’d read said Jen comment that she was uncomfortable with some of Brad’s request during intimate encounters: Brad asked her to dress like a man. Hummmmmmm, and didn’t Jolie dress like a man, and actually pass very well for one, while filming SALT? And didn’t Brad bring the kids to the set so they could enjoy it as much as he? Gag, gag.@Guest2:

    Reply
  339. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 8:13 pm

    @Patty anne:
    I use to think Brad and Jen made a cute couple when I would see their picture on magazine covers. I don’t watch a lot of television, so I have maybe seen only a couple of episodes of ‘Friends.’ I didn’t know that Brad asked Jen to dress like a man. The more I learn about Brad the more I can see why Jen is lucky to be away from him.

    Reply
  340. joanne said on July 17th, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    @Guest2:
    Plus the Holey one is looking more mannish everyday. She reminds me of an anoxic American Dad (cartoon).

    Reply
  341. joanne said on July 17th, 2011 at 8:19 pm

    @joanne:
    anorexic. duh.

    Reply
  342. jan said on July 17th, 2011 at 8:35 pm

    That stuff is weird. Once when I was dating this really cute guy a few years ago, he asked me if I would mind if he put on one of my nighties. (me with sticking my finger down my throat and gagging) Needless to say, that was that and his cuteness suddenly went awaaayyyy.

    Reply
  343. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 8:50 pm

    @jan:
    Oh, that would do it for me also! :(

    Reply
  344. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:13 pm

    I never heard that about brad asking her to dress like a man. That would be a bit of a turn off, wouldn’t it? Remember the photos of Jen naked except for the man’s necktie? I wonder if that turned brad on? Here it is if anyone hasn’t seen it.

    Jolie did dress like a man in Salt, maybe he liked it along with the other nasty stuff they supposedly do. Jen didn’t have a chance did she?

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/1592171/jennifer-aniston-necktie-nude-04/

    Reply
  345. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:21 pm

    Here she is in Salt looking like James Haven with lipstick. I’d forgotten how sickly she looked while filming that movie. Someone here said they thought the relationship ended earlier than the NOTW story said maybe in 2009 which is when she was filming salt. Maybe that’s why she looks so bad.

    http://www.bittenandbound.com/2009/03/14/angelina-jolie-filming-salt-in-nyc-photos/angelina-p3/

    Reply
  346. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    @jan:
    I hope you didn’t let him put your nightie on!

    Reply
  347. Up the Coast said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:38 pm

    @jan:
    You should have told him that what really turns you on….is if he would put on the nightie and then do some heavy cleaning around your place :lol: Think girl, think ;) (oooh yea baby, wash those windows/dust that furniture)

    Reply
  348. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    @Guest2:
    It’s been a while since I had seen that photo. I just don’t understand how anyone could think that there is anything boyish/manly about Jen.

    Reply
  349. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    :lol:

    Reply
  350. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 10:01 pm

    @WCKitty:
    Angie probably started that to make jen look bad. She’s such a witch.

    Nite all, gotta get ready for work tomorrow :(

    Reply
  351. Guest2 said on July 17th, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    Siska, where ya been?

    Reply
  352. WCKitty said on July 17th, 2011 at 10:17 pm

    @Guest2:
    Night!

    Reply
  353. siska said on July 18th, 2011 at 8:27 am

    @Guest2:
    still here..just enjoying all of your conversation..very funny and insightful..

    I think if the leaked tape is correct..they really deserve each other..maybe thats why jen sudden no talk with Bp anymore..(as her dad and Chelsea saying)..

    anyway..in sydney..Famous mag..saying about jen will be heartbroken cause Jtx already back with his ex..(I found a bit hard to believe)..and NW..saying good thing about jen..that she having so much fun in the bed with JTx..cause he is a giver..(how do they got this info..??)..and in the radio..one of the entertaiment reporter actually saying he got his info first hand from the make up people doing the HB junket,which jen being bombarded with text from JM..(this is maybe I can believe..he seem really into her..basic on the TS song dear john..its sort of hinting he used her as a rebound hook up from other woman)

    Imagine if JTx and JM meet..and there are fight..wow..I dont know who I will bet to win..I think maybe JTx..he is shorter..but seem bad ass..he..he

    Reply
  354. siska said on July 18th, 2011 at 8:36 am

    Jen and the friends movie The HB..already hot 60 M for 2 week..for domestic income only..wow..already made the budget..Congrat!!!..Can not wait to watch it in sydney..btw..Harry Potter..its good movie..I really recommend it than Transformer..

    Reply
  355. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 9:03 am

    @siska:
    I tried watching the older Transformers movie one time and after about 1/2 hour I got so bored I turned it off. Not my kind of movie I guess. Yes, HB has done very well. Not sure what to make of the rumors of Jtx gettng back with his ex. If it’s true then maybe it was a PR romance after all. I hate to say that I could believe the JM text rumors are true but I hope they are not. Yuck, I can’t stand that boy man.

    Reply
  356. Guest said on July 18th, 2011 at 9:40 am

    @siska:

    “how do they got this info..??”
    They get it from their imaginations! The level of belief in tabloids that have been repeatedly proven to lie over and over again from otherwise seemingly intelligent people amazes me. And FYI, as bad as the US tabloids are, the Aussie and UK tabs are even worse in terms of truthfulness. How would anyone know with authority whether Jen is having that kind of fun in the bed with Justin? Are they present in the room for this? And that story about him “cheating” with his ex is based on an ALLEGED lunch he had with his ex on June 19th. So what if he did have a lunch with the ex? He was spotted with Jen before and after the 19th and looked pretty into her at her Grauman’s event in July. These tabloids need a story, and more importantly they need a story invovling her as she sells big time for them (at least one of the US tabloid’s top selling issues lasy year was one with Jen on the cover). Jen is fairly private about her personal life – since she is done US promotion for HB she hasn’t been seen at all. And since she isn’t out and about giving them pics to formulate a story around, they have to make up one instead, and they love to paint Jen as “poor Jen” – which is why a couple of the tabs are running with the story that there are problems with her and Justin. If you are really her fan, you need to stop buying into this garbage.

    “..and in the radio..one of the entertaiment reporter actually saying he got his info first hand from the make up people doing the HB junket”

    Again, what rubbish! What “make-up people” doing the HB junket? The only make-up person Jen had was long-time friend Angela Levin – she certainly wouldn’t be giving out scoops about her friend to random reporters. And any other make-up people on hand for other cast members wouldn’t have been close enough to Jen to know anything to begin with. Jen did junket interviews alone and the three male leads did theirs together. So they were in separate hotel rooms (as evidenced by the many US entertainment show clips of this), as were their entourages (including make-up people). Besides this, it’s doubtful that an entertainment reporter was alone with a make-up person anyways – the reporters are supervised in junkets and led to and from each interview. When would this reporter have even been able to get this supposed scoop? And even better – how did one Aussie interviewer hear all of this and yet no one else did, no other reporters? Use your brain!

    Of course there is the odd occasion where the taboids get a real scoop, and everything that comes directly from a celeb or their publicist isn’t always 100% truth. But, what people need to start doing is looking at things critically. As in, don’t just take the suspect word of a tabloid as truth – balance it against other facts, pics, etc. Stop taking all tabloids at face value – because honestly you won’t even be able to do that with the way they all contradict each other. Case in point – the Mayer story has already been denied to other outlets.

    Reply
  357. Dream said on July 18th, 2011 at 11:38 am

    @Guest:
    many good point, ty

    Reply
  358. Dream said on July 18th, 2011 at 11:56 am

    Since no one else has posted this I am. And, ha for once, I am on topic, sort of I guess.
    Any way made me laugh, and feel old…..
    http://www.dlisted.com/2011/07/17/there-can-only-be-one-mermaid-wheelchair

    Reply
  359. Evil Kitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 12:00 pm

    @Dream:

    hahaha, Dream, I was just reading that on Dlisted and came on to this site to specifically post that, lol. You beat me to it. Gaga is such a copy cat and MK calls her out on it “Lady Xerox”. :)

    Reply
  360. Newbie said on July 18th, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    Would love to have “Lady Caca” called out on all her shenanigans. Will def check out Ian’s new book…in the meantime, anyone else dying for new gossip here??? Ian hasn’t posted for over a week, hope he’s okay! I’m totally jonsin’! Anything on JLo and MA? or anyone? Beuller? Beuller?

    Reply
  361. Evil Kitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    @Newbie:

    I’m dying for a new post too. Would prefer Brangelina, but anyone other than Gaga would be OK too. I guess Ian is mainly focussing on his book these days.

    Reply
  362. WTF said on July 18th, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    @Guest:
    So according to this logic – any Brad/Jen reconciliation stories are false as are the Brad/Angelina break up stories. Gotcha

    Reply
  363. Guest said on July 18th, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    @WTF:

    “So according to this logic – any Brad/Jen reconciliation stories are false as are the Brad/Angelina break up stories. Gotcha”

    Actually – yes IMHO! I’ve NEVER believed there is even a shred of truth to the idea that Jen and Brad are/were reconciling (there is absolutely no real evidence to suggest this and it makes zero sense given the circumstances of their split, the years that have passed, and the baggage he now carries). I also don’t believe that Brad and Angie are/were breaking up. There have been countless stories suggesting both over the years and 6 years on and neither have proven accurate. Now who’s to say in the future whether Brad and Angie will remain together – there are so many splits, particularly in the celeb world, that this would not be shocking news if they ever did. And whether or not they are truly happy together – well that I have no idea about. I do have an opinion based on photos (not just tabloid stories) that they aren’t everything they try and appear to be, happy being one of those things. But these stories from the tabloids that they’re splitting, they’re marrying, their adopting, they’re fighting, etc. are to me just that – stories. Occassionally a tabloid might hit the nail on the nose (I said above that they do get a scoop on the odd occasion, or alternatively, they might just have been lucky with a particular story), but for the most part it is obvious to see how these stories come about and to see them for what they are – lies.

    The most commonly true tabloid stories are those that originated elsewhere and have some basis in fact or that can be supported by actual provable facts. But these stories based on nothing more than conjecture, “sources” and without hard proof such as a picture, believable timeframe, or on-record named sources are always suspect.

    Reply
  364. payal said on July 18th, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    brad is in london looking very happy without angelina as is she in l.a

    plus jen is going to be in london for her premiere on wed will anything happen??

    Reply
  365. WTF said on July 18th, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    “The most commonly true tabloid stories are those that originated elsewhere and have some basis in fact or that can be supported by actual provable facts. But these stories based on nothing more than conjecture, “sources” and without hard proof such as a picture, believable timeframe, or on-record named sources are always suspect.”

    so what’s you opinion on books where authors have sources but are unnamed? Different or the same? Just curious?

    Reply
  366. Evil Kitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    @payal:

    haha, really Jen will be in London on Wednesday? My guess is JTx will be attending the London premiere with Jen, looking up at her lovingly, while she gazes back at him. BP will take the two boys out for a family outing and photo op, minus the twins of course, because they are in hiding. Jolie will need to get in there somehow, so expect a photo op of her and the two girls or if not, something will be on twitter and reported as fact by her loons. The tabs will have a field day.

    Reply
  367. Evil Kitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    @Evil Kitty:

    Or if not, there will be a report on someone’s facebook page saying that Ang and Brad secretly flew someplace and were seen at some romantic resort having a little “Mommy and Daddy alone time”. The report will say how much better looking they are in person, ofcourse. This will be reported as absolute fact by the loons, ofcourse.

    Reply
  368. guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    The twins were returned to their real parents but they will have to borrow them back again so that angie can prove to jen, once again, that she is more fertile. No wonder knox always looks so cranky. That crazy lady is hanging onto him for dear life. Viv doesn’t mind because she always gets a new purse out of it.

    Reply
  369. Evil Kitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    @guest2:

    haha, I forgot about that, they’ll prob be rented out again soon though. Viv is always carrying a purse come to think of it. Maybe she is their version of Suri Cruise.

    Reply
  370. angelooney Whoreley said on July 18th, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    after spending some time at female first ……….. i have realized ………. sniff ………. i am not the queen …….. sniff …….. jen is soooo hot ……..

    Reply
  371. Dream said on July 18th, 2011 at 3:43 pm

    Just came from FF. I want to run up and give AJ the biggest hug ever!!!! Omg what ever she did to make those girls so happy I hope it continues. Of course the fact that the parents are on separate continents and there are only two of them may be part of it.
    I think the state of affairs in their home is summed up well in those pictures.
    Any way beautiful picture Jolie looks happy and pretty and the girls are actually skipping. YAY.

    Reply
  372. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 3:46 pm

    hello everyone!
    hope you all are having a great/good/even ho hum summer. just please no bad times for anyone this summer. that is my wish right now. a big and tall order i know but i will have other wishes later. ;)

    @ siska….. YOU my girlfriend, KNOW how the tabloids work. we have repeatedly asked you to fill us in on the aussie and other tabs. i have missed you (big hug) and you are always humble, smart and kind always when stating an opinion or chatting in fun mode, unlike some others who patronize or outright bully with statements as this….’And FYI’ and ‘If you are really her fan, you need to stop buying into this garbage.’ and ‘Use your brain!’ …..siska, these condescending arrogant tiny tomes belie the guest’s ‘IMHO’ response to someone else. you omitted from such consideration for whatever reason.
    rock on siska!!!!!! don’t let a grouser guest,WHOEVER it is, get you down low. you are light bright and brilliant siska. you have and share an uplifting spirit, a few here are downers with their condescendingly dulcet tone.

    Reply
  373. Dream said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    hi was just wondering about you. glad you checked in.

    Reply
  374. Evil Kitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:03 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:

    Hi selfrighteouswhore, you tell it like it is! Hope you are enjoying your summer. :)

    Reply
  375. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    @Dream:
    hi dream! i thought about YOU last night when i looked in my jewelry box and saw my blue topaz. hug to you dream.

    Reply
  376. Tetta said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    You are right, she´s a queen. I also spent about 45 minutes at FF looking at ITAS. Jennifer seems “real” in a way you never would expect. For what ever reason the interwiev was done (pr for HB ?) she is a winner. I wish her all luck in the world.

    Reply
  377. Dream said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    ha i do love blue topaz. how are u?

    Reply
  378. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:16 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    things are getting better for me evil kitty.
    ha, now honestly, how evil can a kitty be????? ;)
    hugs to you too darlin’.

    Reply
  379. Evil Kitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:

    lol, I don’t know, my cats are pretty naughty :)

    Reply
  380. guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    You’re awesome. Welome back.

    Reply
  381. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    @Dream:
    i’m good. thanx doll.

    Reply
  382. rushdog said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    Ian must be off doing research and such on other subjects. Certainly the “triangle” stuff must get tedious to him, but I also wonder if he knows the end of the story and will jump back on that subject when the time is right. I seem to recall someone posting that the plan after Cannes would be for them to be seen less and less together. Were the last pics of them in Cannes or have they been photographed together since then? Their current movements through the world are much different than in the early part of the relationship (attached at the hip w/all the children and regularly photographed vs traveling alone w/one or two and much fewer photographs). I’ve always thought both of them looked happier apart than together, especially her. Could also be getting whatever she needs :) in LA which could increase the smiles.

    Reply
  383. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    @Evil Kitty:
    they can be so bratty can’t they? and i wouldn’t have my kitties be any other way. i wouldn’t recognize them.

    Reply
  384. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    @guest2:
    hi guest2!!!
    thanx to you for the uplift also.

    Reply
  385. joanne said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:44 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    glad to see you are ok.

    Reply
  386. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:44 pm

    i am trying to read some i have missed. so lady gaga is trending now at ian’s. :P

    oh the whole world is gaga so what ya gonna do? i watched sopranos like a freak and she was on an episode, for a cheap second.
    thats ok, because i am kind of wondering big time about the other side of gaga. ‘the girl’ who fell/jumped (cough) from the building a week after gaga signed her deal. imho…like a song once said, ‘it was no sacrifice at all’, but it was.

    i hope ian delves into that in his book. kurt cobain just may be resting easier per se with some truths/questions revealed/raised in ian’s books. the truth is out there. when we freely eat from the media slop trough, our minds are controlled by the few. i want some truth to make it’s way to my mind.

    Reply
  387. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    @joanne:
    joanne!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    i have missed you too. i’m sitting in my box elder tree and i can see you from here. love ya.

    Reply
  388. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    she is hot! janiston passed my sniff test!
    i think i’m going on a new diet…. 1 banana for breakfast, 1 hot dog for lunch and 1 popsicle for a bedtime treat. hope it works. :P

    Reply
  389. joanne said on July 18th, 2011 at 5:01 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    ;)

    Reply
  390. Guest said on July 18th, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    @WTF:

    Same. Not to say I don’t believe them outright; just that I need more than simply an author’s claims and unsupported “sources.” If an author has proven themselves trustworthy through supportable facts, then I’m more likely to go along for the ride of a story they are presenting with unnamed sources.

    Reply
  391. Tetta said on July 18th, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore
    Good to see you ! We have been missing you.
    :)

    Reply
  392. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 5:43 pm

    @Tetta:
    hi tetta! thanx so much. i really mean it.

    Reply
  393. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 6:39 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    But no milkshakes, okay :)

    Reply
  394. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 6:49 pm

    @rushdog:
    The last time I recall them being photgraphed together was at the water park in Malta (remember the black wet suit?). There was also that photograph on the set of brad’s movie with the kids where supposedly she was there but not seen in the photo. They always look happier apart don’t they? I believe they are no longer a real couple but I guess we’ll just have to wait and see. I think Ian will come back to the story at some point but maybe nothing to say at the moment. Anyway, he’s going on vacation so no clues for a while.

    Reply
  395. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 7:12 pm

    @Guest2:
    hahaha! by all means, no disturbing and loaded milkshakes for me!
    i imagine it is hard to make ‘The Milkshake’ go down in a sezzy way without being offensive.
    i’ll leave that move to the desperate burnt turkeys who keep moving back that line they won’t cross and the professional wish fulfillers who get paid the big bucks. :P

    Reply
  396. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 8:09 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Burnt turkey may have gone to dirty bird heaven, not heard from in a very long time. Not missed either. Not sure how much catching up you’ve done but thescoop4u paid us a visit and told us that brangie are secretly married since before shiloh was born. I was just reading something about them on eonline and among other things Ted C. says this:

    5. Could They Already Be Married? Lastly, and because they are such good actors (sorry, to the chorus of boos we just heard, both Angelina and Brad more than deserve their accolades and Oscar recognition), we very well could be the last ones in on the laugh—as well as the happy occasion. Perhaps all those times Brad’s said gays should be able to be married first or that their kids really do want them to marry, it’s all just a fabulously played-out mystery before the final reveal: They’re already hitched. Says a woman who has known and hung out with the uber famous couple for many years: “I always suspected they were married long ago.”

    Us, too, babes!

    Reply
  397. WCKitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 8:38 pm

    @Guest2:
    Shhhh!!! Last time somebody mentioned that dirty bird it started posting again! LOL. Over at FF a certain nasty poster has also been noticed to be missing and I’ve sometimes believed that they were one in the same. Hmmm. :)

    So Ian is off on vacation? I guess that is my sign to get busy with the stuff that I have been procrastinating about. :(

    Hi SRW!!! Glad to see that you are okay! I have missed your posts! :)

    Reply
  398. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 8:53 pm

    @Guest2:
    i have not caught up much yet. i keep having to get up and do something.

    wow, possibly married all this time. anything is probable with these two and their bosses. i bet some of the loons would be a tad p!ssed/jelly that they were left out of the loop and not able to celebrate with them. bad enough not being invited or that it was not televised like royalty. :P

    are they testing the comment boards to see what rabbit to pull out of their holes next?

    in general, if i were a fan of the dande/ho brand (can’t imagine), i think i’d be seeing them as a let down, not kosher. from occasionally reading some comments on other boards in the past, i do see it is getting harder for some fans to justify some sketchy details also.

    Reply
  399. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    @WCKitty:
    hi wckitty!!!!!
    thank you doll. i appreciate it.
    it has been fun -trying- to catch up on here today.

    Reply
  400. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 9:00 pm

    @WCKitty:
    If they post in capital letters they probably are one in the same. Did you notice at ff that someone posted they’re holding auditions for supporting cast for Cleopatra? Maybe that’s what has aj so happy.

    I’ve been procrastinating myself. Maybe I need a vacation from IUC :)

    Reply
  401. Guest2 said on July 18th, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    Someone here said they will need to have a fake wedding so they can get a real divorce :lol:

    Reply
  402. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 18th, 2011 at 9:09 pm

    @Guest2:
    HAHAHAHAHA!
    that is sooo funny and sooo the dande/ho.
    they would work it and use it all.
    absurd and cynical. lmao.

    Reply
  403. WCKitty said on July 18th, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    @Guest2:
    No, I hadn’t so thanks! :) I am sure that is probably one of the reasons that she is smiling. I wonder who the lucky supporting cast will be. Wow, what the poster wrote about Scott Rudin! If true, the supporting cast will be in for loads of fun having to put up with both Rudin and Jolie. I had a flashback to a former employer of mine when I read the description of Rudin’s behavior! Yelling, throwing stuff, and yes he was well-known as a ballistic nutcase. His temper was never directed at me thank goodness! :)

    Reply
  404. joanne said on July 18th, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    @Guest2:
    Not supporting cast, background cast, Cleo will be all about her, as usual.

    Reply
  405. Capri said on July 18th, 2011 at 10:59 pm

    For a few giggles, a poster at

    For a giggle check out the LA smiley pics. Look at the green sign and the arrow….An FF poster noticed this gem. I think that you will love it. Sorry for interrupting but I had to share this one. :)

    ff

    Reply
  406. joanne said on July 18th, 2011 at 11:02 pm

    @Capri:
    the wacko sign and it points at Jolie?

    Reply
  407. Up the Coast said on July 18th, 2011 at 11:32 pm

    Hi SRW! :) Missed YOU! I think joLIE’s perfect project would be her as every character…like Norbit.

    Reply
  408. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 12:12 am

    @Up the Coast:
    hey!!!!!!
    i haven’t seen your androgynous avi’s breasts in a long time?!?!?!?! hahaomg.
    jolie feels she is every woman doesn’t she?
    i see the happy pix they managed to get of her with her 2 girls and her LV bag. nice exploitative touch. i guess mommy/bag-lady was happy to stroll with her hollyhobby and the joy spread to the girls? that is all i could come up with upon seeing them…i’m not at all sure their glee isn’t similar to a puppy off it’s chain. i have just heard too much joLIE on tape and seen the moves she makes to give the raving shrew liar the benefit of the doubt where her ‘blob’ or any child is concerned. holly must have brought the goods home imo.
    btw, dande looks straighter with this lovely young girlie by his side. ;)

    Reply
  409. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 12:25 am

    @Capri:
    thanx. all signs seem to point to jolie being a propped up wacko. born and bred and nurtured.

    Reply
  410. checkmate said on July 19th, 2011 at 1:02 am

    is brad gay? then jen was his unknowing beard? why oh why is there a conspiracy about secret meetings and texts???? why would jen want a gay man? why even revisit their failed past?
    why isn’t jen’s happiness with justin not enough?

    unless it is not about jen anymore, but about seeing the downfall of pitt and jolie. well then, knock yourselves out. i’d rather focus on positive…..jen and justin

    Reply
  411. angelooney Whoreley said on July 19th, 2011 at 11:56 am

    the set girl is a cutie …….. i think i have brad pitt on the brain ………….. i was visiting some friends and their kids were watching “cat in the hat ” the movie with mike myers and dakota fanning …………… while discussing plans to get out of trouble the cat listed plan a, b and c ………. when he said the second option this is what he said …..”" plan B ditch the kids and cut your losses”" ……….. and THEN gave the camera a wink and a smirk …….. i think i need a new hobby ……… when i see brad dressed as achilles or tristan i think what a stud ……… when i see brad pitt i think what a dud

    Reply
  412. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    @siska:

    ‘Imagine if JTx and JM meet..and there are fight..wow..I dont know who I will bet to win..I think maybe JTx..he is shorter..but seem bad ass.’

    hahaha, never thought of that….perhaps mayer should choose to retreat. in his case, it is not so cowardly as it is sparing himself a major ass whooping. it’s ok if the only other thing he could do is duck and cover. if theroux had some length to his hair at all, i think mayer might resort to pulling hair and crying from the get go.

    Reply
  413. Up the Coast said on July 19th, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    OMGawd! That is hilarious!!!! Except, I think he should ditch the bitch, and cut his losses. :lol:

    Reply
  414. elby said on July 19th, 2011 at 3:18 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    The set girl is darling!

    Reply
  415. elby said on July 19th, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    @Guest2:
    I just can’t see Cleopatra being a success w/AJ….maybe 10 years ago, but not now.

    Reply
  416. elby said on July 19th, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    I hope Ian’s impeccable sources have not dried up w/all the NOTW busts!

    Reply
  417. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:26 pm

    @Guest:
    I know..they know we are interesting to find out jen stuff..so they just made that up..but its fun..i read it for entertainment..anyway..sometime maybe its true..specially if they tips the people who happen in the same room like waitress or security staff..or if they bug her phone….I usually think this tabloid stuff all rubish..but when I heard about the tapping of celebrity.make me wonder..its mean some of the story has a merit..eventhough they did it illegally..I suspect its happen in england..maybe can happen in US too..cause the owner of that tabloid own Fox studio and even I think NY post?

    Reply
  418. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    thank you darling..welcome.back..we are so gald to hear from you..hope you have a fun time with your family..I dont worry too much about the comment..I think Guest had the point..and I respect people different opinion..
    anyway..I am looking forward to read more from you

    Reply
  419. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:39 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    ha..ha..pulling hair stuff..remind me of my childhood fight with my school bully..its a girl trademark fight style..he.he,, I dont think JTx..has hair long enouugh for it..but Jm has long hair..maybe Jtx can did that..I doubt he seem can seriously kick ass..(Charlie A movie?..he is HOT)

    Reply
  420. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:40 pm

    @siska:
    hi doll!! things are fine here. hope all is well with you.
    you have a gentle spirit and a strong constitution. awesome combo, i must say. x

    Reply
  421. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:41 pm

    @elby:
    remember Mel from Celebzter..who reported JA and BP text message?..if thats real..she might got that from NOTW hacking scandal..

    Reply
  422. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:42 pm

    @siska:
    theroux could brab mayer’s hair, spin him around and gave him a smooch. see what happens next. :P
    mayer seems like a lover, not a fighter.

    Reply
  423. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    you are a sweety..thanks you..this place will getting more great energy with you back on..

    anyway..what are you think of Jtx saying to jen I love U in the Chinese Theatre?..so cute>>??

    Reply
  424. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    @siska:
    i want to kiss him for her!

    Reply
  425. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:45 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    he is a lover..and sweet but loose mouth..he..he ..I like him cause he seem talk first and think later..so we can get more info from him..

    Reply
  426. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    he..he..I cna just imagine that..emm,,wet or dry kiss?..he..he

    Reply
  427. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:48 pm

    if i could forget my germ phobia…sopping wet.

    Reply
  428. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:48 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    do you know Jtx mum..is a really good writer?..she was divorce and married again with a republican..and I read Jtx..first tatooo was the one he made by himself..an X ..this guy quite extreme..

    Reply
  429. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    @siska:
    there ya go. loose lips say sooo much. ;)

    Reply
  430. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    @siska:
    he is ruff around the edges. i found a b/w pic the other day of him on his motorcycle with a target design on top his helmet. giving the devil sign. it reeked of leather and gay and dork. hahaha lmao. i don’t care i hope she gets a good time out of him. now, theroux’s mom seems cool as hell. another mom i think she will get along well with perhaps. :(

    my son did that handmade tat thing too. first and only tat. right on his hand so it sticks out like a sore thumb when he shakes hands. i wanted to slap him up side the head. j/k

    Reply
  431. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:13 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    ha..ha boys will boys..they did stuff without fear..he..he

    bttw..I read about AJ talk about her kids eating bug..she introduce it to them and now they got addicted..so she had to ban it..and Ted C saying his source saying that AJ wear the pants in that family..she even pick which of BP friend can still be in their inner circle..and that circle is getting smaller..

    Reply
  432. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:15 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    I hope my son will not did that..but i fear he will..its in their gen..he..he
    Its must be painful..maybe the pain made him learn his lesson..

    Reply
  433. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:20 pm

    jen an JTx are in London..they being spotted shopping in Murdoch shop?..someone just twitter it..so she will be attending London 22 july premire..

    Reply
  434. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:31 pm

    Matt damon just reveal that he is lucky he didnt have a life like Brangie..which is a prisoner of their own life..they had to have troops of people to protect them when they going out..and suddenly ..there are pictures AJ with her kids just walking freely on the street..coincidence or conspiracy?

    oh another book from one of HW producer who used to be an israel secret agent..confirm that BP and AJ start relation before the married end..and when the its uncover Jen kick him out and he offer place to stay for BP..and BP went to set undercover with bike.

    Reply
  435. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:35 pm

    @siska:
    he was drunk. ugh. wonderful excuse.

    Reply
  436. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    @siska:
    i think she had her camera guy with her day for the pix of her and shi and z and he cracked a joke for the girls. ;)
    yeah there is just no way that the other woman is jolie and nothing physical happened until later on. later on was a long time. the MAMS shoot was a long broken up one correct?

    i saw this for the first time at FF today..so close… http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_le771jfegJ1qdibj5o1_500.png

    Reply
  437. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:48 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    alcohol..is one great excuse..he..he

    Reply
  438. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 7:52 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    yeah..she is a sassy media person..
    they keep deny it when its already with soo many people saying it is true..even in black and white.(3 published books).anyway..love happen..
    wow..this picture show..she blantanly flirt with her ex in front of BP..,,she is the one who wear the pants in that relation..no wonder BP stuck..some man like to be rule by a woman..

    Reply
  439. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:01 pm

    @siska:
    that pic pretty much tells a tale of a billy goat tied up in a junkyard.

    Reply
  440. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:04 pm

    @siska:
    i want to see a janiston/theroux pic that is worth a 1000 words from this premiere also. :P

    Reply
  441. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    @siska:
    he saw it the next day and instantly hated it.
    he hid it from me for weeks by staying away or being sketchy and shifty and in a hurry all the time. he ended up just giving up and showing me when a friend blabbed to me. i gave her a cookie as a reward.

    Reply
  442. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:

    ha..ha..you are funny….a wild man like Bp suddenly meet his match..and thats why this relation maybe last..

    Reply
  443. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    your cookie..must be an award winning..to bribe someone..he..he

    at least he learn the lesson..its the hard way..but thats the only way the kid will learn..eventhough we as parent try to warn them..nothing stick like their own experience.

    Reply
  444. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    but I doubt she will take him walk the red carpet..but i have my finger cross..I need my romantic fix..
    btw..this is throw the JTx.back with his ex to the curb..(she didnt bring JM to her M&M london premire..this one must be more special)

    Reply
  445. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:21 pm

    @siska:
    he seems to get off on walking that classic razor’s edge.

    Reply
  446. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:22 pm

    @siska:
    yipeee!??!?!!!
    i am rooting for this and trust that she knows wth she wants. she is not dumb so i think she can handle the ride.

    Reply
  447. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:23 pm

    @Guest2:
    Transformer..is target mostly for young man audience..its a bit too noisy for me..i am with you with the feeling relief after watching it..he..he
    JM is ok..but he need to grow up more..he really seem to love her..even on the record try to defend her..but back fired to him..his bed habit..I didnt care much..its his life..

    Reply
  448. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    @siska:
    yes siska, you are spot on. my son has always had to learn things the hard way. always. so i sit back and wince.
    that cookie was a reward for a slip of the tongue well done and keep it coming big mouthed little girl. :P

    Reply
  449. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:27 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    yeah she is..she enjoy it..and its maybe not everlasting..but as long everyone have fun..there are no harm..
    oh the London premire..i think 20 july not 22..my bad..so tomorrow?..im not sure about London time different with ausie..today is 20 th here..

    Reply
  450. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:28 pm

    @siska:
    she sure looked pleased as punch bobbing around in her pink (i think) bikini in the pool with mayer in some pix i saw. too bad he had to poop all over the party they had going. he sure looks better with long hair and that mustache covering his problem area. we all have one. ;)

    Reply
  451. siska said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:41 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    i dont like his mustache..he look dirty..prefer him more shorter tidy hair..

    Reply
  452. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:44 pm

    @siska:
    u r so fun to disagree/agree with. giggle.

    Reply
  453. Guest2 said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    @selfffrighteouswhore:
    In that tumblr pic is that jen in the top picture?

    As for matt damon’s comment about them living in a prison , puhlease. Even with six kids they manage to come and go without being seen when they want. And when they are photographed it is all carefully orchestrated. Phonies.

    I was watching ET and it was all about the Jlo/MA split and they are dissecting their relationship and talking about Jlo’s possible infidelity with a the cuban brad pitt who was in her video and hos ma was controlling and jealous. It’s getting dirty. I imagine this is a big concern of the brand when it comes to a public split (if it ever does).

    @siska:

    Reply
  454. Guest2 said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:48 pm

    @Guest2:
    Holy crap, was I hitting random keys? You get the gist of it though, I hope.

    Reply
  455. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:50 pm

    @Guest2:
    hi guest.
    the girl in the blue ruffles? no, i dont think it is janiston.

    Reply
  456. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 8:53 pm

    @Guest2:
    i can’t believe the stuff that comes out of these hollywood claptraps. they are walking satire. living in a prison my arse.

    Reply
  457. angelooney Whoreley said on July 19th, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    did anyone else see what i was talking about???? i think im going crazy …….. or more crazy

    Reply
  458. selfffrighteouswhore said on July 19th, 2011 at 10:55 pm

    @angelooney Whoreley:
    i looked on youtube….yes, i saw it.
    Cat in Hat is turning pages and reading….
    “plan B…cut your losses and ditch the kids. that could work.” the pussy said.
    holy synchronicity.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

July 2011
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta