IUC World Exclusive: Royal Wedding White Gown Goddess….

Posted on April 29th, 2011 by HisHighness in 1, IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive, IUC:Fashion

William katewhite gown goddess….Fergie’s weeping edema…Wilkat lasting longer than contractions…royal debauchery band…who can claim head of household…Harry playing the field in craps…mystery lovers corner…Diana would have giggled!!!!!

  • 163 Comments
  • Tags:
  1. meldoesn'tknowjackshit said on April 29th, 2011 at 10:49 am

    For all you skanks Angelina will be filming her Louis Vittioun campaign starting today 4/29 in Cambodia. Not Coach but LV got that. She and her entire family including brad is in Cambodia right now. When the pictures start emerging do not say I did not warn you.

    Reply
  2. whatever said on April 29th, 2011 at 11:25 am

    Who fricken cares? No one cares about a two bit celebrity hawking hand-bags.

    She’ll do for LV what she did for St. Johns…..their stock tanked, thus why they literally fired her, and refused to sign another contract with her.

    Reply
  3. Kate said on April 29th, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    @meldoesn’tknowjackshit:

    Thank you for letting us know that, we were sure she would find some way to get attention since she was not invited to the wedding. Too bad she got stuck with LV though, their name has been destroyed with knock offs. I don’t anyone that will even buy a LV anymore precisely for that reason, and they are just not really that attractive . Hermes, Chanel, Prada, Escada, even Gucci would have been a better choice. I see Kate Winslet was given her her pretty suits ha! I am sure also the good people of Cambodia will be impressed that she is pimping our her son as a handbag, lol. Poor Maddox. hope he sticks his tongue out.

    PS- I think the Royal Wedding has her beat hands down though. She is going to have to marry a Duke of something to top that.

    Reply
  4. rushdog said on April 29th, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    This is silly but I’ve been so busy that I forgot about the wedding until I was driving my son to school. Have been able to catch the replays. I thought the bride looked lovely and appear more comfortable (allowing for the usual tension before the ceremony) that Diana. Hopefully that she’s ten years older than Diana at the time of the wedding, and that she’s known William for so long, will help her handle the public side of her life.

    Reply
  5. meldoesn'tknowjackshit said on April 29th, 2011 at 12:53 pm

    Please don’t speak out of the 4 corners of your stinking mouths. I am only stating the facts since you were all sure she did not get that endorsement. Stop lying Angie did more for st John.s more than any other person throughout St John’s boring clothes life time. Angie brought life to their clothes, you jealous haters.

    Reply
  6. Guest2 said on April 29th, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    Dear jackshit, go away. No angelina stuff here. This thread is about real royalty.

    Diana would have giggled because of the mystery lovers. Maybe Charles is cheating on Camilla. With a man perhaps? Maybe Camilla has a girlfriend. Thanks, Ian. This is a fun change of pace and I’ll bet the secrets in that family are far more interesting than any brangie stuff.

    Reply
  7. rushdog said on April 29th, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    @meldoesn’tknowjackshit:
    Has been noted.

    Just for the record: “trips and traps”…”butter chicken crock pot”….”camera obscura.” It was in the clues – something was coming!!

    Reply
  8. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    @whatever:
    That was my first thought! Who cares? There are more FAKE LV bags in the world, so with that, I have to agree that joLIE is the perfect FAKE spokesman :?

    Reply
  9. rushdog said on April 29th, 2011 at 1:02 pm

    Since this is written in the same format (and which often has double meanings), always leads back to Brangie and has no tag again I’ll take a stab at relating today’s clues to the puzzle: so it’s an update on the “bride” on this festive day.

    JA (the white gown goddess) is or is getting irritated at BP because the end of the immorality is coming in spurts and taking too long to kill/end the team. AJ (of Harry the rat) for financial reasons is gambling to hold out for more (?money/?PR). Look for new information and hidden secrets to come. The real Diana would have enjoyed this gossip!!!!

    So that’s my guess on today’s clues!

    Reply
  10. Kate said on April 29th, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    LOL yes , how embarrassing to pimp for them, have you ever walked seen all the knock offs sold on the street corners in major cities around the world, and I mean world. They should have gone with a model. Makes her look desperate for a gig.

    Reply
  11. Kate said on April 29th, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    @rushdog:
    I agree, this is a Brange puzzle. Just using the wedding as an analogy.

    Reply
  12. meldoesn'tknowjackshit said on April 29th, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    Just for the record UTC you people did care. You debated wheter she had the endorsement for days on end. You even wondered when Coach publicly acknowledge Gwennth Paltrow, how come Angie wasn’t okayed By LV. Well now she has to the tune of 10 million dollars but of course now your mouths are all twisted in knots.

    Reply
  13. Liz E. said on April 29th, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    St John Knits Int’l stock was fairly consistent through the years of Jolie’s affiliation with them. It wasn’t until after she left that stocks began to precipitously fall. Apart from the fact that a gossip forum is hardly the place to analyze the intricacies and myriad reasons for fluctuations in the apparel industry it would be as silly and unreliable to attribute their fall to Jolie’s leaving as it would be to attribute their NOT falling to Jolie’s affiliation with St John.

    Louis Vuitton is a venerable quality leather goods company. Its brand and especially its luggage is still very much a high end desirable. The existence of knock offs has little to do with that. People who can afford LV do not buy knock offs. The original LV monogram design was created in 1896 to fend off knock off luggage of the time.

    I thought Kate Middleton looked lovely and she wore a Grace Kelly knock off. LOL!

    Reply
  14. rushdog said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    For the record, I could care less if she has the LV promotion or not. My guess is that her people have been out looking for a way to keep her in the spot light (legitimately actually) and relevant as she gets older and if/when a public split w/BP occurs. This celebrity stuff is primarily a young persons game and, imo, her tabloid presence over the last few years has significantly distracted from her acting/films. Also, imo, she’s deteriorated in her looks during that same period. I’m under the impression that she’s not definitely scheduled to film anything this year (at least not at this time) where there would be some publicity during the filming and then loads when the film comes out. So she has limited opportunity for a while (at least after KFP2) to get that film related PR and to use Pitt and the children as promotional tools. So enter the LV advertising then schedule a humanitarian trip every 3-4 mos. and tada! – that keeps her face/name out there until another film comes out. That’s my take on it anyway.

    Reply
  15. Kate said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    @meldoesn’tknowjackshit:
    I didn’t . and I don’t care. What a contradiction eh, pimping designer bags one day and sitting in a mud hut and faking Saint Angelina the next. Even TMZ has called her out on it now. lol oh well what is a girl to do when she is being dumped , she has to make some money.

    Reply
  16. Kate said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:19 pm

    @rushdog:
    yes, sounds right, then she can check back into where ever they are keeping her. lol

    Reply
  17. Lyin' Ian said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    LMAO~ You guys make Jennifer seem more pathetic than she makes herself look. Waiting around for Brad to come back to her. One thing Brad doesn’t do is look or go back.

    And saying you’re not interested in AJ is like saying you don’t drink or eat anything. That’s all you do here is talk about Angelina and/or Brad with these Cap’n’ Crunch riddles.

    Wonder what crackhead ho Lyin’ Ian has in his 5th floor apartment in Hell’s Kitchen. LOL.

    Reply
  18. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    How. Nice.

    She’s traveling to a war torn, poverty and hunger stricken country to earn her 10 million dollar salary for pimping out a luxury brand that hardly any Cambodians can afford. Just the cost of one LV item could feed a Cambodian village, or an orphanage for a week. That’s just the cost of the item. I wonder what the 10 million could do…

    Reply
  19. Guest2 said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    Wow, I’m really naive. I thought we were getting some juicy gossip on the royal family but here we are talking about a drug-addicted actress pushing expensive purses. All roads lead to brangelina. I should have figured it out when the first post was from a brangeloonie :lol:

    Reply
  20. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    @badasschubbychickinminiskirt:
    What is wrong with this picture? duh….

    Reply
  21. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b8/Simpleliving_lg.jpg

    Reply
  22. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    Just for the record…..I had NO idea someone was actually keeping a record :lol:

    Reply
  23. rushdog said on April 29th, 2011 at 2:59 pm

    Actually I might amend my initial guess here to suggest that the entire post is about the Brange. I initially thought the “Fergie” reference mean JA having already been divorced out of the royal family. It could also read:

    Fergie’s – AJ (since she’s the veiny one) or JA (since she’s the one divorced) could read either way
    weeping edema =- putting pressure on BP (edema – abnormal accumulation of fluid/causes swelling & irritation; weeping = fluid puts pressure on the veins and caps they begin to leak; pushing on the swelling causes indentations, referred to as pitting)
    Wilkat = combined name like Brangelina, Brangie, TomKat
    lasting longer than contractions = lasting longer than expected
    royal – as in HW
    debauchery band – death metal band from Germany as of 2008 the Debauchery live members called the Kill Team and are ever changing. And this is great! – formed in 2000 as Maggotcunt and changed their name in 2002. = the HW immorality/depravty
    who can claim head of the household – HOH is US tax term/the HOH can benefit from higher deductions = financial reasons
    Harry = AJ name of her rat
    playing the field in craps – field is a bet type/the moment the system loses value you get in the poor house/can be profitable butyou have to know how to do it right and when to walk away = gambling/trying to hold out for more profit (?money/?PR) until the time is right
    mystery lovers corner = “hottest new best sellers as well as obscure hidden treasures” = look for new info and some hidden secrets to come
    Diana would have giggled = Princess Diana would have enjoyed the gossip!!!

    Reply
  24. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    woah!

    Reply
  25. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    now we are all in trouble!

    Reply
  26. Lyin' Ian said on April 29th, 2011 at 3:38 pm

    Obviously, you’re very ill informed of the work of the Maddox Chivan Jolie-Pitt Foundation and all the good work it has been doing since 2003.

    But, hate puts blinders on. That’s why you guys walk into so many walls. Especially, Lyin’ Ian. A guy from Hell’s Kitchen, NY. Who has no clue what is going on. But, he’s got you all bending over and grabbing your ankles. The way he likes it.

    Again, good for a laugh.

    Reply
  27. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 3:48 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    Lyin Ian is from Hell’s Kitchen? Ian I thought you were from Montreal?

    Reply
  28. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    joLIE fans sound so full of hatred….it’s sad :(

    Reply
  29. Patty Anne said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    That’s mostly the reason they ARE Jolie’s fans, they recognize like kind – psychopath, drug addicted, moralless, manipulators. It’s the only vision they can see but they have to look very close to see Angie’s face, she sits on it.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  30. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    @rushdog:
    To file as HOH, you need to be single with at least one qualifying child who you have paid for half the cost of keeping up your home while the qualifying child/person lived in the home more than half the year. Sounds very cut and dried…..

    Reply
  31. Lyin' Ian said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    Oh, yeah, so full of hatred. We don’t create hate sites, we don’t wish for a family with 6 small kids to break up. Our lives aren’t dependent on Brad and Angelina breaking up.

    And Patty Anne, you need to quit reading tabloids, pull your head out of Lyin’ Ian’s ass and get some fresh air. And then maybe the echoes in your head will stop.

    He may have been from Canada, but, dude lives in a walk up in Hell’s Kitchen. That’s why you get these crackhead clues.

    Reply
  32. liv4 said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    I don’t know who Fergie is referring to but it is notable that she was not invited to the wedding and a few sources have indicated it is because she is an embarrassment due to the scandals surrounding her. Where I am confused is that weeping edema can be due to pregnancy and then we have “lasting longer than contractions”, another pregnancy reference.

    I think it is funny that one of Debauchery’s hits is TORTURE PIT.

    The playing the field in craps is risky and considered by many a losing proposition.

    Remember the Mona Lisa clue with the tag JA monalisamama (or something like that), I was talking with my brother the other night and somehow we got on the subject of Mona Lisa and he started discussing how Mona Lisa in the pic was thought to be pregnant but wore no wedding band, which was considered at that time extremely scandalous.

    Reply
  33. Patty Anne said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    Thank you for your recommendations and sincere show of concern for my welfare, but I’m quite happy where I am. You see I don’t take this as serious as you appear to, to me it’s relaxation, entertainment and a break from my hobbies, charitable works, and travels. I must say you have done a very good job of entertaining me here, so I think I’ll choose to stay awhile and wait for your second act. Should be interesting, but I’d like to ask why you are so clearly interested in Ian’s ass? Are you male? Just wondering.@Lyin’ Ian:

    Reply
  34. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    21 jump street reruns have made someone into an obsessed private detective.

    Reply
  35. Dream said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:38 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Some times it’s decided in a divorce settlement. Especially if there’s a 50/50 split.

    Reply
  36. liv4 said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:38 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    You’ve gone from have a different opinion to cyber-bullying again (Cyber-bullying is “the use of information and communication technologies to support deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior by an individual or group which is a Class A misdemeanor).

    Everyone here is interpreting clues, you are bullying the patrons of this blog.

    Reply
  37. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:39 pm

    tho not so private. blabs all it thinks it knows everywhere.

    Reply
  38. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:40 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    OH YEAAAAAA……haha, You make me think of the kool-aid commercial where the jug of kool-aid breaks through the wall :lol: OH YEAAAAAAAA :lol:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBeUGqeYsQg

    Reply
  39. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    BTW…..Who is WE???? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

    Reply
  40. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    good catch.
    squeak squeak
    could be a pack of rats

    Reply
  41. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    i’ll see your bet and raise ya 11

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iE4uEsaBF0

    Reply
  42. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:58 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    Where do I begin.

    Hell’s Kitchen no longer exists and hasn’t existed since the 50’s and 60’s when it was known as a gritty, working class neighborhood. It’s now called Clinton, and is a neighborhood of actors and actresses, and writers and other artists. Most of the studios are there, acting coaches, voiceover coaches, agents, etc. And Broadway is just a hop skip and a jump away. It’s anything but the place it once was and is now considered a very desirable neighborhood in NY and has been for well over a decade.

    Ian doesn’t live full time in New York, that I know. So if he can afford an apartment in Clinton as a part-time place for when he’s in the city, then all the power to him. He’s doing better than most.

    Reply
  43. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 4:58 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    :lol: OH YEAAAAA :lol:

    Reply
  44. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 5:03 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    Wait…are you the loon who posted here a few months ago, with a very bad knowledge of geography?

    All, last year sometime I distinctly remember a loon coming on and giving another poster heck for saying they lived in New York City. The loon came on to tear them a new one, calling them a liar…because the person lived in Brooklyn!!! LOL!! This person didn’t know that Brooklyn was part of New York City!!

    It was funny, and par for the course with these people. Their elevators don’t seem to go up to the top floor, so to speak.

    Reply
  45. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 5:03 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    drinking the kool aid.
    a great american pastime.

    Reply
  46. Liz E. said on April 29th, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    As one who was born in NYC I can assure you that Hell’s Kitchen most certainly still exists. The only people latching on to the name “Clinton” are the realtors and the pseudo-arrivistes who want to deny the neighborhood’s rather colorful and seedy past to up real estate values. There are still some iffy sections and buildings in the neighborhood and it all depends on where you live and in what building. Lots of section 8 and other public housing still exists in Hell’s Kitchen and unfortunately those are the buildings which still see drug dealing and other unsavory activity.

    Reply
  47. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    Every neighborhood in NYC has Section 8 and unsavory characters. That’s NY. The fact is that Hell’s Kitchen or the old hell’s kitchen does NOT exist and hasn’t existed for well over a decade in its old form. I know. I lived there recently, two friends of mine currently live there. I had lunch there the other day.

    It used to be on par (or worse) than Harlem for crime and poverty. Even Harlem, or parts of it, are becoming gentrified. The neighborhood is made up of ‘artists’, actors, actresses, writers and other artists. My acting coach is there, my friend who is on broadway lives there. My fave dive pub is there, so is my fave breakfast place.

    When the money in Manhattan had no where else to go and Chelsea was no longer affordable, the money began gentrifying Clinton. The community is responsible for its name change, as the neighborhood began morphing into a desirable ‘hood in NYC.

    Since you were born there, you should go back and take a stroll down 9th Avenue and count the Starbucks, and see how much the place has changed.

    Reply
  48. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 6:37 pm

    @Liz E.:
    And when you do take a stroll down 9th, make sure to stop at my fave dive bar…Rudy’s.

    http://nymag.com/listings/bar/rudys_bar_and_grill/

    Reply
  49. Guest1 said on April 29th, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    The 2009 tax return for the Jolie-Pitt Foundation is now available:

    http://dynamodata.fdncenter.org/990s/990search/ffindershow.cgi?id=JOLI412

    I noticed that neither Jolie or Pitt made a contribution to the foundation in 2009. The foundation gave away over 25% of its principal. There is a statement on the 990 that states “Although the Foundation technically experienced a “substantial contraction,” it will continue in existence and has no plans for dissolution”. (Statement 10).

    Another interesting part of the 990 is Statement 11, which states: “In 2003, Ms. Angelina Jolie (in conjunction with WildAid) began a $ 866,606. project dedicated to the conservation of Cambodia’s endangered Cardamom Mountains’ northern territory. Formally known as the Maddox
    Jolie Project and based in Cambodia’s rural and impoverished northwest, the initial focus of its conservation work was on the protection of Samlout National Park (Samlout Protected Area), Samlout
    contains most of the region’s biodiversity: forests, freshwater ecosystems, and endangered species. As more resources became available, MJP’s operations expanded into other areas such as
    reforestation, community protected area, park management and integrated rural development (UN Millennium Development Goals). In 2009, the project’s assets were transferred from WildAid to the
    Jolie-Pitt Foundation which continues the project (”MJP”) currently.”

    If they began an $866,606 project in 2003, why is it shown on the 2009 990 under “Part IX-A Summary of Direct Charitable Activities”? Stephan Bognar, the CEO of MJP Foundation was paid $140,000 in 2009 from JP Foundation.

    Statement 12 states: “Microcredit: During 2009, MJP disbursed loans to 52 needy Cambodian individuals, who used their loans to purchase crop seeds an agricultural tools. All borrowers successfully repaid their loans during 2009.”

    $2,000,000 of their contributions for 2009 went to Make It Right Foundation. I got the following information from the same website above regarding Make It Right:

    Financial Data
    (yr. ended 12/31/2009)
    Total Assets: $40,781,113
    Total Giving: $106,269

    Reply
  50. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    a drop in their trough

    Reply
  51. Lyin' Ian said on April 29th, 2011 at 7:38 pm

    No, I wasn’t. Just threw Hell’s Kitchen out there because his riddles sound like he gets them from crack hos, or maybe he’s one and that’s why they sound like jibberish and foolish jibberish, at that. Like, I’ve said, I only post under this moniker. I quite like it’s truthiness.

    Reply
  52. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 7:43 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvbAseCN8F8&feature=related

    Reply
  53. Lyin' Ian said on April 29th, 2011 at 7:47 pm

    Gives you a break from your charitable works? Good one. You seem to take this all quite seriously. Believing every tabloid story, everything that Lyin’ Ian says, Morton’s book. And state it as fact.

    I have to keep asking and no one ever has an answer. What has Lyin’ Ian ever gotten right about Brad and Angelina except that Angelina was at the 2010 Superbowl and he didn’t get that information first.

    Reply
  54. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 7:54 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    a hearty guffaw, spoooks!

    Reply
  55. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 7:57 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    Again you are incorrect.

    When she was on the plane headed to Miami for the Superbowl, he posted about it. He had two friends who were in first class with her, and before her plane even landed, he posted about it. So he did have first hand knowledge.

    http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/07/iuc-exclusive-brad-in-miami-angie-en-route/

    If you read the post, you’ll see that he didn’t only know that she was on her way there, but he also knew her agenda for the days following the superbowl. And everything he said would happen, happened.

    Look, I’m not here to defend Ian. Just get your facts straight before you spew things. It makes you look ill-informed. Believe me, I’d like nothing more than to hear intelligent inspired reasons why someone can worship someone like her. But instead you offer inaccurate data and facts.

    And as far as Ian goes, the only reason why I continue to visit here is because I know that he knows people. And I also know he knows what is truly going on. If you don’t want to hear it, then don’t visit here. But you can’t get angry with Ian simply because of circumstances you cannot control involving your two idols.

    Reply
  56. Up the Coast said on April 29th, 2011 at 8:06 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:
    Shouldn’t you be working overtime in order to afford your Louis Vuitton bag??? Come on now…..what is Ange gonna say ;)

    Reply
  57. Lyin' Ian said on April 29th, 2011 at 8:24 pm

    LMAO! If he knows people than why did he say over a month ago that Brad and Angelina had broken up when that post from The Superbowl claims they already were.

    Did you believe Ian when he wrote that Brad and Angelina were molesting their kids or that Angelina was having sex with dogs and plants and how he conveniently deleted alll of those vile things when his book came out. And why did he beg Brad and Angelina to read, I mean acknowledge his book? That tanked.

    You believe him. I don’t. He hasn’t shown me any proof that he knows a thing. But, he does get some of you folks running around chasing your tails trying to get so-called facts on his bogus information.

    He went from story developing and never following through, to his cereal box riddles. And I wouldn’t be proud to know anyone that has written the vile things he has and call him a good guy. He deleted those vile posts for a reason. And it was to save his ass.

    Reply
  58. elby said on April 29th, 2011 at 8:37 pm

    Seriously, who writes this stuff?

    Recent reports claimed William and Kate are determined to create a loving home for a child from another culture.

    “Kate’s got a big heart just like William’s late mother Princess Diana,” a source said. “That’s one of the reasons Wills fell for her.

    “Kate also respects Angelina Jolie for the way she’s reached out to give children from other cultures the chance for a happy life, and she wants to do the same.

    “Wills thinks a foreign adoption will help finally modernize the royal family and make it more popular with the people.

    “He knows his mother would have loved the idea.”

    http://showbizspy.com/article/231432/kate-middleton-gets-maternity-wear-from-victoria-beckham.html

    Reply
  59. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 29th, 2011 at 8:44 pm

    @elby:
    LOL! Yes the entire royal family, esp the Queen, would just love an adopted heir to the throne. Ridiculous.

    Reply
  60. Dream said on April 29th, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    @elby:

    she looks up to aj who she didn’t invite to the wedding? interesting.

    Reply
  61. fffruitcup said on April 29th, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    thanks for reminding readers about just a couple of the vile things jolie has done for fun with no photog around. where there is smoke there is a freak who needs to be on a short leash.
    she could threaten dragging a person into court to have a team of lawyers scream that it didn’t happen. and if someone wanted to dance that expensive dance, imagine what could come out.
    the stuff that made it to print was charming as well. she is nasty!
    cue the lucky white horse that saw her with a come hither whore look on her face tits hanging out for some f’ed up reason and a sugar cube glued to her side tit. it only wanted a sugar cube. she is the perverted one. head flying back in delicto. oh and the black sheep she had in a headlock. she should paste one of those pics to her big forehead and the other one to her flat ass the next time she heads off to make a difference. baaaaa

    Reply
  62. tsk said on April 29th, 2011 at 11:01 pm

    Whose ass do they pull this shit out of? I can’t imagine the Queen allowing this….No Way. Can you just imagine the shit storm if they were to bring a black or Asian child home? LOL. She would probably explode. That is as likely as her allowing PH to marry outside his race. I would LOVE to know the secrets within that family.

    OT: Did anyone respond to my question about what really happened btwn brad and angelina on the set of M&Ms? I can’t remember what post that was so I can’t go back and check.

    Reply
  63. Run its course said on April 30th, 2011 at 1:36 am

    I dislike Bradgelina but I dislike this riddles even more. Starting to get draggged out and I am getting supper bored. Someone wake me up when there is an official announcement. Until then, I’ll be looking out for any (legitimate) update on the beautiful Jennifer Aniston.

    Reply
  64. Lil said on April 30th, 2011 at 7:24 am

    hello?! this is a royal family clue! no brange! i was waiting for this so pls!..

    Reply
  65. Lil said on April 30th, 2011 at 7:25 am

    mistery lovers corner??O.o maybe the prince is bi?

    Reply
  66. angelooney whoreley said on April 30th, 2011 at 9:55 am

    @fffruitcup:
    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ………………. gross

    Reply
  67. siska said on April 30th, 2011 at 9:57 am

    i just love will and kate..they are seem genuine in love to each other..I hope it will last to the end of time…There are too many relation broke up..make us so pessimist in love..but if they survive it..its will gain faith in love and marriage..
    Kate looks soo beautiful…she is elegant but still down to earth..and the way they look at each other..its show they are equal…
    I love romance and happy ending..he.he

    Reply
  68. siska said on April 30th, 2011 at 10:05 am

    @fffruitcup:
    what is the kool aid reference?…sorry..im aussie..so I sort of lost ..he..he

    Reply
  69. seabee said on April 30th, 2011 at 11:10 am

    I am so done with this site and these stupid riddles. Three months of rumors about the impending break-up of Brangelina and nothing… Besides, what’s so surprising about a Hollywood couple breaking up anyway? What percentage of Hollywood couples don’t break up? Maybe two percent, and the husbands are all gay. On top of the never-happened break-up/meltdown of Brangelina, Ian Halperin threw in tons of bullshit about stolen foreign children, retarded babies, suicide/murder attempts, pregnant lovers and ex-wives, massive drug overdoses, etc. etc. etc. What a con. And please give Kate and William a week or so before floating lies about them too on this piece of crap website.

    Reply
  70. angelooney whoreley said on April 30th, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    seabee ………….. i agree …….. AND …………. charles has one son ………… ONE…………. william ……….. diana is giggling

    Reply
  71. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    @angelooney whoreley:
    I think so too! My Mom said to me the other day “I haven’t seen Harry in such a long time but I saw him today and he looks just like that guy that Diana had an affair with” and I said “Who? James Hewitt? And she said YEA! That guy – he’s the spitting image. I had to laugh because my mom is a true Royal loyalist – and she doesn’t read the tabs so this was just out of left field. I also don’t know how anyone got that this clue was about Brange, I mean, it could be but I don’t see it.

    Reply
  72. Lil said on April 30th, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    @angelooney whoreley:
    i guess Harry is the son of her horse trainer, the red head. the brits hate him.

    Reply
  73. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    Re William and Kate adopting – I can’t very well see the Queen allowing that to happen. But, maybe after she produces an Heir and a Spare – the Queen might see it as a modern thing to do. I think there is an Act that prohibits adopted children from ascending- It would go to the next in blood line. I think – I’m not stating that as fact though.

    Reply
  74. Guest2 said on April 30th, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    I don’t really see a resemblance between Harry and James Hewitt. I do see a resemblance between Harry and Charles, especially around the eyes, both close set, and the facial expressions. I think Harry favors his mother’s side of the family in coloring and bears a resemblance to Diana’s brother who is also a redhead. We won’t ever know, of course, unless they submit to DNA testing. Does anyone think the queen will abdicate the throne to Charles or will she by pass him for William?

    Reply
  75. Guest2 said on April 30th, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    @Tamara:
    I thought the clue was about the royals too but then Kate and a couple of others came on and said it was about brangie. She seems to be in the know about how Ian works. Also, the brangeloonies have been going crazy here so who really knows what the clue is about. Not me, that’s for sure. But right now I’m finding the royals more interesting.

    Reply
  76. AmyWinelake said on April 30th, 2011 at 3:01 pm

    Harry was privately DNA tested and found he was indeed Charles son. It was run in the tabloids about ten years ago as a very heavily veiled, almost, blind item. I was more surprised he is Charles son than not.

    Reply
  77. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    @Guest2:
    All I know is Harry is a CUTIE!! Funny how Edward had to abdicate the throne in order to marry Wallis Simpson – I think it was because she was a divorced American (lol) but times have changed and apparently Camilla is okay to be Consort even though she too is divorced.

    Reply
  78. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 3:11 pm

    @Guest2:
    No, but then I don’t know what most of the clues are about! lol You seem to be really good at them as does Rushdog. I just thought the timing of the post was key inasfar as it was posted the day of the wedding. So I didn’t even suspect that it was about Brange.

    Reply
  79. Justa Visitor said on April 30th, 2011 at 5:47 pm

    I thought Kate was beautiful. I agree, they seem to be so comfortable with one another and they both beam while they are together. Of course, just like everything else, I’ll retain a bit of skepticism as far as the future is concerned.

    I can hardly talk about excess and the JPs and not think about excess and the royal family. Eeek.

    Reply
  80. Kate said on April 30th, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    @Guest2:

    I was agreeing with Rush , who is very well tuned into the puzzles, and Liv who has gotten quite good at interpreting the meanings(Pitt Torture, good clue) and how they cross reference even when tagged to a different celebrity. If you remember, when there were other celebs covered since January, the clue was still Brange related, even when the photo was tagged about the other celeb(tag says William and Kate), and especially since Ian has not been tagging the photos as he was: Angiegone, MamaAniston, etc as Rush pointed out. It is my opinion that Ian is sharing a story with us as he goes along , while he is investigating, gathering information,or getting tips, researching, or whatever he is doing. He has chosen this format to do so, it keeps him free of being hassled legally, it protects whatever he is working on, and gives him a chance to fine tune it before he allows himself to be hassled and beaten over the head again by that big mouth Star.(you know the one) I would love to see him go head to head with her on all this, that would be the cherry on top, live of course, so nothing can be cut this time. lol, but each person has to read the clues and decide for themselves what they mean. I personally do not see the point of throwing in a story about the RW smack in the middle of the Brange Epic. He used the Royal wedding before , and that also was a Brange clue. That is just the way I am reading it though, and it could of course just as easily have nothing to do with them. Only IAN knows for sure, and I believe as we go along one clue will lead to the next and we will look back and say, yeah it did fit, or no, it did not. That is sort of how I look at all the clues, just one at a time, and til the next. :)

    Reply
  81. Astro said on April 30th, 2011 at 6:23 pm

    Why is Ian taliking to us using a lot of puzzles now?

    Reply
  82. Kate said on April 30th, 2011 at 6:48 pm

    @Astro:
    dunnno, but guessing the same reason Ted C does.

    Reply
  83. Astro said on April 30th, 2011 at 6:51 pm

    @Kate:

    Whoooo????….I don’t care about Ted C!!!.

    Reply
  84. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 7:43 pm

    Kate is probably right but it still sounds like the RW to me. Here’s why:

    white gown goddess – Kate the bride
    .Fergie’s weeping edema – Fergie crying upset because she wasn’t invited
    Wilkat lasting longer than contractions – there have been rumors that Kate is pregnant
    royal debauchery band – the disco after the wedding at Buckingham Palace
    who can claim head of household – I’ve been reading all over the internet that Kate wears the pants in the family
    Harry playing the field in craps – on again off again relationship with Chelsy Davy – gambling on the relationship, or flirting with someone while playing cards at the reception
    mystery lovers corner – someone getting together at the reception/disco
    Diana would have giggled!!!!!

    Reply
  85. elby said on April 30th, 2011 at 7:45 pm

    @Run its course:
    I’m with you Run as far as I came here mainly for the JA stories. I had originally wanted to see JA back w/BP but I am over that. The longer he stays w/AJ the more sex appeal he loses! I don’t really care about AJ stories. She reminds me of the crazy cat lady on The Simpsons. But instead of looking psycho and collecting cats, she looks psycho and collects kids. I was wondering if Ian was letting us know with the Royal clues not to believe the article about Kate “admiring” AJ and Will and Kate wanting to adopt…not that we would! I am no good at the clues and wish we could more get more facts from this site. I miss some of the people who used to post here regularly and think they got fed up with the riddles.

    Reply
  86. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 7:48 pm

    @Tamara:
    But then, Ian probably wrote it that way to make it seem like the RW – he is pretty clever with these clues. Torture Pit is the white elephant in the clue IMO, so like I’ve said before I really am crap at these!! LOL

    Reply
  87. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 30th, 2011 at 8:11 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:

    The “Maddox Chivan Jolie-Pitt Foundation”? FFS – what a pair of pretentious w*nkers!

    Reply
  88. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 30th, 2011 at 8:32 pm

    Oh and I forgot to say I bet Ange is really pissed she’s not the most famous woman in the world any more huh? Watch her people try to link her to Wills and Kate in some PR way, as they did Obama and Gaga when they first hit. Whenever someone gets some major league fame, it only takes a few seconds for Jolie’s PR vultures to swoop in….

    Reply
  89. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 8:44 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Someone said she was supposed to be in Cambodia shooting for Louis Vuitton this weekend but I only saw a small blurb on it – she must be so pissed off right now! :)

    Reply
  90. Guest2 said on April 30th, 2011 at 9:42 pm

    You did a great job solving the clues for the royals. I would just add that I think the mystery lovers are Camilla and P Anne. I always wondered about her. :lol: Or Harry and Pippa (how cute would that be). I do think this is a clever way of presenting clues about the brange. Something about this puzzle got the loonies in a tizzy. Or maybe they came on here yesterday expecting a clue about brangie and got mad that Ian was talking about the royals instead of their idol. I can just picture them frantically checking Ianundercover every day to see what Ian and the posters have to say. What I do know for sure is that the more clues we get the more clueless I become. I’m glad we have some super sleuths on here.

    Reply
  91. Guest2 said on April 30th, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    @Guest2:
    That was for Tamara…

    Reply
  92. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 10:41 pm

    @Guest2:
    Camilla and Princess Anne? WOW, now that is interesting! lol I was doing some research on the Monarchy today and found out that bisexuality and or full on homosexuality is quite common in the Royal Family – for instance I read that Queen Elizabeths uncle had a long time love affair with Noel Coward – and after his death NC enjoyed a long friendship with George’s mother and his wife (widow). P Anne has long been suspected of being gay – hasn’t she? Its too bad they can’t just come out and live their lives the way they want to. But the best would be as you say Harry and Pippa! :)

    Reply
  93. Tamara said on April 30th, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    @Tamara:
    Diana would certainly be giggling if it were about Camilla and P Anne! lol

    Reply
  94. Stella said on April 30th, 2011 at 11:56 pm

    @Lyin’ Ian:

    Wow…Sex with plants, gosh I hope it wasn’t a cactus!!

    / ‘-’ \
    ; ;
    /’-| |- ‘ \
    | |____K |
    \ ‘——-’ /
    ‘.___…..___.’
    | ; : ;|
    _|;__;_;I_
    | Y | .–.
    .–. \__.’^’.__/ ; ;
    / ;\ |_ ; _| I ‘ I
    | ; | { `”"”` } | ; I
    |’ | { } I ; I
    | ; | { } I |
    |; | ;`.__.’| |: ;|
    | ; \ |; ; |____/ ; |
    | ‘.’—–’ ‘ -_ .’ I
    \ ‘. – _ ‘ ; ; _ – :”
    ‘. – – ; ; ………../
    `——–. ;|
    |; , |
    | ; |
    |. ; |
    | : :|
    | . |
    |; ; |
    |; , |
    | ; |
    |. ; |
    | : :|
    | . |
    |; ; |
    |; , |
    | ; |
    | ; |
    |. ; |
    | : :|
    | . |
    |; ; |
    `”—–”`
    Now this was annoying to create!!!!

    Reply
  95. Stella said on April 30th, 2011 at 11:59 pm

    Wow my cactus died…..

    _ _
    | | | |
    -| | | |-
    _ | |- | |
    -| | | | | |-
    |.| -| ||/ |
    | |- | ___/
    -|.| | | |
    | \_|| |
    \____ |
    | | |-
    | |
    -| |
    | |

    Reply
  96. Stella said on May 1st, 2011 at 12:00 am

    OK I can’t bloody do a cactus………

    Reply
  97. elephant said on May 1st, 2011 at 12:12 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Welcome back – you’ve been gone a while!!!

    Reply
  98. Kate said on May 1st, 2011 at 1:27 am

    @rushdog:
    I have kind of gone back and forth on this and the last term about Diana giggling is a sticking point for me. It has been used in so many different ways from, affectionately looking down on her sons and giggling at the stupid things they did , in reference to Dodi, his family, but each time it appears she giggles because she feels the situation is silly, stupid, ridiculous, something of that nature. I don’t know if that is how Ian meant it.

    When you google white goddess gown you get several wedding shop references naturally and some greek references, so I can see why that leads to Jennifer. Fergie was not invited to the wedding nor was Angie and she may be putting pressure on Pitt as you described, (and she obviously as other problems so it could be a reference to a symptom of other problems as well, but that is given), so that does seem to indicate that Willkat (Brange) is still hanging in there as a product , not intimately, because we know they are finished as a couple.I thought Liv’s clue about …royal debauchery band-Pitt torture seems to make sense, it probably is at this point , and maybe that is why there is a weeping edema, he is the weeping edema, lol. …who can claim head of household-arguing over custody- I wondered how that would go when they split, it would certainly make a big difference wouldn’t it , sounds like custody is not final yet. I agree, who in the world can forger Harry the rat, oh my gosh, so Angie is definitely taking her chances here isn’t she?…mystery lovers corner-keep checking back- rather clever of Ian , yes, lol, funny guy, we do anyway. …Diana would have giggled!!!!! she would think Brange are ridiculous.ya so do we!! na my vote goes to Brange. IAN is very smart, dishing on double trouble , who can hit him for this, no one.. ;)

    Reply
  99. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:50 am

    IDK, the clues just don’t seem to fit the Brange as well as they do the RW. And Ian HAS posted about them many times in the past and he did say that Diana was one of his all time heroes. He has also posted about Harry being James Hewitt’s son, about Charles, Camilla, Fergie and Andrew. So its not such a stretch to think that Ian actually posted something that didn’t have to do with the Brange. Although I do agree that the majority of his posts ARE about the Brange so one would automatically conclude that this one is too, but like I said he has brought up the shenanigans of the RF many times prior to this so its not such a stretch. JMO

    Reply
  100. Sandy said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:57 am

    My take on this riddle is similar to Kate’s…I believe William and Kate’s marriage and their continued relationship is arranged. I have friends who live in London and they said William is a spoiled rotten obnoxious guy and Kate’s family are gold diggers who sold her for money and power. I’m told Kate and William are not intimately involved at all — William was ordered to marry Kate. And, there is a written contract reference future children, at least two. The head of the household for this relationship is the people who owns the “corporation” — the monarchy.

    Brad and Angie’s relationship is all fake — no intimacy — the Brand is being told to continue for money. The contract is under dispute with B/A.

    Princess Diana would laugh at all this because it is all going to blow up as her marriage to Charles.

    Jen Aniston would giggle at all the Brand because this too will blow up in their faces.

    Reply
  101. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:01 am

    @Kate:
    The HOH clue is what points to brangie for me as that is a tax code for the U.S. The thing I am wondering is who files as head of household now. You can’t file a joint return if you are not married. So either they are married and file jointly or they file separately with one of them as head of household. To qualify for HOH you must have paid more than half the cost of maintaining the household for the past year and your eligible dependents must have resided in your home for more than half the year. If not married, why wouldn’t the current arrangement be carried over. If married and getting divorced then only one of them would be able to claim HOH. Or have they both been filing as HOH and are now in trouble with the IRS? It’s a strange clue that raises a lot of questions to which I have no answers. I’ve wondered many times if they are secretly married and are hammering out the details of a divorce settlement. I suspect that whether married or not the major issue is custody of the children. There are a lot of messy details to work out in any kind of a split and I can see her throwing up a lot of road blocks. This is JMO as I have no idea if they are splitting even though all of the clues here point to that.

    Reply
  102. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:01 am

    @Sandy:
    Do you REALLY believe that Diana would laugh at this? Don’t you think she would want so much more for her beloved son than the life she endured while part of the RF?? IMO she would be crying not laughing.

    Totally O/T but Ian – who did the voice over for the audio version of the Governator – was that you?

    Reply
  103. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:06 am

    @Guest2:
    Have the kids actually ever stayed in one household for half the year? And if so, where would that have been – California? France? …….??? Where do they actually live and go to school? Beats the hell out of me! :)

    Reply
  104. Sandy said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:20 am

    @Tamara:
    Diana’s giggle is a giggle of sarcasm. Diana always wanted the best for her sons, but the reality is her sons are owned by the monarchy. Just maybe Diana is laughing because this “farce” will take a dive way before the monarchy expects — and just maybe her son, Wills is behind it. Just wait and see…

    Reply
  105. Tetta said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:28 am

    @Sandy

    First off all, I havn´t read all your comments so maybe this already is clear out.
    Why on earth should William need an arranged marriage ? Is he gay ? I´ve never heard that.
    He is still young and has a lot of time to find the right bride if Kate isn´t the one and only. As Williams family seems to grow very old, he probably has the time on his side. And to even have a contract to have two children together. Does Queen Elisabeth ask for some proof that they are able to get children together, checked sperm, ovaluations and so on. If it´s an arranged marriage I think Diany would do anything but giggle, she would cry ou loud. I think she want to see her son happy.

    Reply
  106. Patty Anne said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:36 am

    Your theory makes sense to me based on Ian’s use of the American Federal Tax HOH law. I do recall Ian telling us once, maybe twice, that they will separate when Angie is ready, meaning she has all sorts of manipulative ploys she uses to get her way with Brad. I also wondered about a secret marriage, perhaps one of those informal ceremonies they staged for the children was actually a legal one by mistake? LOL Only Brad Pitt could accidentally get married. @Guest2:

    Reply
  107. Patty Anne said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:41 am

    I was thinking about your comment of Diana giggling and I thought that could be possible due to her son marrying a commoner just as Charles did. So all the fuss the royals made about Prince Charles marrying a commoner came back on them with Prince William’s marriage to Catherine. Huge Giggle~!@Sandy:

    Reply
  108. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:41 am

    @Sandy:
    Sandy – there is one thing from your comment that I DO agree with – that he was probably ordered to marry Kate. I mean, its kind of like sh*t or get off the pot already. They’ve been together for almost 10 years, he’s almost (or is?) 30, it’s time to settle down and produce some more royals. And yes they usually expect two – an Heir and a Spare. As for William being obnoxious – well that pretty much goes with the territory where everything is done for him and he is the future King after all so that would be a given. Royal toothpaste squeezer anyone? LOL :)

    Reply
  109. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:49 am

    @Tamara:
    also don’t you think it’s obvious that the Middletons would want their daughter to be the next Queen of England? I mean, what Brit wouldn’t when it came right down to it? I just can’t see them sitting around having their tea saying: Oh, I’m not sure William is the one for our Kate – I really think she could do better! hahaha

    Reply
  110. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:50 am

    @Tamara:
    I agree that Diana would be unhappy if this is an arranged marriage for her beloved son. That’s why I thought the giggle would have to do w/Charles and/or Camilla. Maybe it’s Charles with the butler or the head chef.

    Reply
  111. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:52 am

    @Tamara:
    :lol: They probably brush those formidable teeth for him too.

    Reply
  112. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:56 am

    @Guest2:
    hahaha formidable – that is funny!!

    Reply
  113. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:58 am

    Diana wasn’t born with ROYAL blood but she was as close as its possible to be:

    Commoner is misunderstood by those from other countries. Anyone not born to a member of the royal family is a commoner. However, Diana was an aristocrat from birth. Her marriage to Charles elevated her to the royal family, and her divorce returned her to the ranks of the aristocracy.

    The person who believes her family doesn’t have inherited titles is incorrect. Her father was an Earl, her mother a Countess. On Diana’s father’s death her brother, Charles, became the new Earl Spencer. She was Lady Diana Spencer from birth because her father had a title

    Reply
  114. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:01 am

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol: An accidental marriage for Brad only. Plotted by the evil Angie. I still think back to a clue about a crime a few weeks back. Married maybe so that they couldn’t testify against each other. How could she still be so manipulative if she is mentally impaired which it does apear she is from the most recent pictures? Lots of stuff there that we haven’t come close to figuring out. I really hope JA is far, far removed from this. JMO.

    Reply
  115. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:01 am

    Keane – what is your take on the whole Royal Wedding and the relationship of Wm and Kate? As a Brit I’d like to know your views on the whole thing.

    Reply
  116. Tetta said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:03 am

    @Tamara

    With my red banners I do to protest against your opinion. I really do think Kates parents want her to be happy. Do you think they can force her to marry William just because he belongs to the royal family ? After spending ten years with William I think she has a very clear picture how her future life as royalty will be . She doesn´t seem to be stupid so she probably know what Diana had to go through. I don´t think she marries William just to get a stupid title.

    Reply
  117. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:06 am

    @Tetta:
    Neither do I and I never said that – I totally agree that she loves him – talk to Sandy she’s the one who said it not me.

    Reply
  118. Tetta said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:11 am

    What does this mean then ?

    Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:49 am
    @Tamara:
    also don’t you think it’s obvious that the Middletons would want their daughter to be the next Queen of England? I mean, what Brit wouldn’t when it came right down to it? I just can’t see them sitting around having their tea saying: Oh, I’m not sure William is the one for our Kate – I really think she could do better! hahaha

    Reply
  119. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:16 am

    @Tetta:
    I was stating my opinion that of course the Middletons would want their daughter to marry William

    Reply
  120. Tetta said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:25 am

    I can see any parents sitting around having tee sying “Oh, I,m not shure William is the one for you – if you don´t love him I really think you can do better!

    Reply
  121. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:26 am

    @Tetta:
    That is NOT what I said!!!

    Reply
  122. Tetta said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:55 am

    @Tamara

    Not word for word, I just filled in “if you don´t love him” because isn´t that the latest post is about. If a wedding is arranged then you don´t love each other.

    Reply
  123. Tetta said on May 1st, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    Now i leave this question behind me because it´s not my problem if they love each other or not. i have plenty of things to demonstrate about before the 1st of May is over. In Sweden it´s 6.00 pm so I must hurry upp.

    Reply
  124. Up the Coast said on May 1st, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    @Guest2:
    The HOH clue leads me to think he’s talking about Brange also. I wonder if they both filed as HOH and that triggered an audit? That could lead to some trouble with the law/IRS.

    Reply
  125. Up the Coast said on May 1st, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    @Sandy:
    Diana might giggle because the Queen hasn’t learned a damned thing over the course of the last 30 yrs. She is still “directing” people’s lives like pieces on a chess board, and life/people are more complicated than that.

    Reply
  126. Up the Coast said on May 1st, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    Does anyone know why Louis Vuitton hasn’t officially announced that Ange is on the payroll? I read that a rep of LV had no comment on this story. What is up?

    Reply
  127. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    That was my thought too but could they be that arrogant to think they could get away with it. I would think their accountants would strongly advise against that. Maybe one of them lied to the other about it and they both ended up claiming HOH. I’m leaning a bit toward them being secretly married and part of the divorce settlement is who gets to claim the kids for HOH status. Six kids is a big tax deduction. There’s a thread over at ff that shows pictures of AJ’s photo ops. In the early ones she wears rings on her left hand and one of them looks like a silver wedding band. We’ve seen pics of BP with a gold band on his right hand. I don’t know, it’s all too confusing and you can go off in so many directions with these clues. We’ll just have to wait and see. Now I have to go do some yard work. I’ve spent too much time here already. See ya’ll later.

    Reply
  128. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    @Tetta:
    Sorry Tetta I would have responded earlier but we had a huge storm here and it knocked out power for a few hours. I am not really sure what you’re getting at as it seems we are on the same page. I believe Kate loves Wm and vica versa so why don’t we just agree to agree (!!) and leave it at that.

    Reply
  129. fffruitcup said on May 1st, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    ‘perhaps one of those informal ceremonies they staged for the children was actually a legal one by mistake? LOL Only Brad Pitt could accidentally get married.”

    omg! so funny patty anne. :P :P

    Reply
  130. jan said on May 1st, 2011 at 6:18 pm

    Just watched about half of Sleepers with BP on TV. I ’spose I’m glad I missed the first part because it was probably showing the abuse of the boys. It was okay but I must’ve missed the homosexuality that people have hinted at regarding this movie. Can anyone help with that? Thanks.

    Reply
  131. Guest1 said on May 1st, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    @Liz E.:
    Liz E. – AJ became the new face and spokeswoman for St. John in the Spring of 2006 until 2010 when they announced they were replacing AJ. St. John’s stock dropped from approx $40 a share to $30 a share in the Summer of 2006, after Jolie became the new face and spokeswoman, and drastically dropped to less than $10 a share in 2009, while Jolie was still the face and spokeswoman.

    Reply
  132. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 7:36 pm

    @Guest1:
    Wow, really? I always thought those ads made her look way older than her years – I never did think it was a good fit, guess I wasn’t alone huh?

    Reply
  133. Guest1 said on May 1st, 2011 at 7:40 pm

    @tsk:
    There were a lot of rumors of them on the set. Here is a link to a story from Star from January, 2005:

    http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/starbradangelina011805.html

    Reply
  134. Patty Anne said on May 1st, 2011 at 8:37 pm

    I can’t imagine haute couture house of LV wanting anorexic, 85% tattooed Angelina Jolie to represent them. Perhaps they are planning a new line, Lady Of The Night In A Bar Fight – that she would suit very well.

    Reply
  135. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 8:38 pm

    @Guest1:
    Here’s the reason she was dropped according to St. John’s CEO. I’m no fan of aj but I have to say the photos are beautiful.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/08/angelina-jolie-dropped-fr_n_416162.html

    Reply
  136. Patty Anne said on May 1st, 2011 at 8:38 pm

    hehehe, well thank you veddy much. Brad is a dim bulb yano.@fffruitcup:

    Reply
  137. Up the Coast said on May 1st, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    :lol: That’s Funny! and fitting.

    Reply
  138. Guest1 said on May 1st, 2011 at 8:50 pm

    @Guest2:
    I’m not a fan either, and I agree the photos are beautiful. I was just correcting information Liz E. wrote.

    The link you posted states that they “wanted to make a clean break from actresses and steer away from blondes and cleanse the palette.” Check out the following article:

    Last year, St. John replaced longtime spokesmodel Angelina Jolie with flame-haired model/singer Karen Elson, with the brand’s CEO noting, “We wanted to make a clean break from actresses and steer away from blondes and cleanse the palette.”

    Funny how the brand’s new spokesmodel is a blond actress: Kate Winslet.

    Women’s Wear Daily reports that Winslet is the face of St. John’s fall 2011 collection, as she began shooting the campaign with photographer Craig McDean on Thursday in New Jersey. The campaign will make its debut in September.

    http://www.zimbio.com/Kate+Winslet/articles/aaYNiaSXaUR/Kate+Winslet+New+Face+St+John

    Reply
  139. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:16 pm

    @Guest1:
    Thanks for the link. I didn’t know about Kate Winslet being their new spokeswoman. I wonder how long it will take the loons to start bashing her like they did to Paltrow. I still wonder why no formal announcement from Louis Vitton.

    Reply
  140. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    Tamara, I hope you are surviving the storms without any major damage. They are relentless – it seems you folks just can’t catch a break.

    Reply
  141. Up the Coast said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:29 pm

    I don’t blame St. John for dropping that ‘back alley Sally’, they did the right thing, imo.

    Reply
  142. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    @Guest2:
    I love KWinslet – I think she is just beautiful – and she’s such a super talented actress. I’ll never forget the look Angie gave her at the Oscars when she gave her acceptance speech she thanked everyone but couldn’t remember who she was forgetting and then Oh Yea! Angelina Jolie!! LOL That was so funny, remember that?? hahahaha

    Reply
  143. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:33 pm

    @Guest2:
    Thank you – man oh man but we are just getting hammered, it hasn’t stopped raining today – hard cold rain – blah!! No tornadoes today though thank God!!

    Reply
  144. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:42 pm

    @Tamara:
    my next door neighbors just called to borrow the shop vac, they have 5 inches of water in their basment! We got flooded one year then put in a french drain all the way around our house, so we are high and dry – it drains into a small stream on the side of our yard that now looks like we could go white water rafting! hahaha

    Reply
  145. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 9:43 pm

    sorry for serial posting! Nite all

    Reply
  146. Guest1 said on May 1st, 2011 at 10:03 pm

    I don’t think it is a coincidence that a ’source” told E! News that AJ is to be the new spokeswoman/model for LV right before it is announced that Kate Winslet is the new spokeswoman/model for St. John. I guess she is getting payback for the slight at the awards show (though I think it was the Golden Globes, not the Oscars).

    A little history – back in 2007 E! gave the JP Foundation $250,000 which is shown on the JP Foundation’s tax return.

    Reply
  147. Astro said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:03 pm

    Osama Bin Ladem is dead!

    Reply
  148. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:06 pm

    @Astro:
    I knooooow! I was just going to post that! Its all over the news that Obama is going to address the nation that Osama Bin Laden is dead and supposedly the US has the body!!! BUT they are saying he’s been dead since 2001 – so have they know this for 10 years and are just now telling us???????

    Reply
  149. Tamara said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:23 pm

    @Tamara:
    Okay sorry the real story as being told to us now is that he was killed one week ago (whilst living in a mansion in Pakistan) by the US and we do have the body and after DNA testing has confirmed it is indeed him and the President is about to address the Nation.

    Reply
  150. Guest2 said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:23 pm

    @Guest1:
    I remember seeing that donation from E! but I didn’t connect it to the LV story. The other thing I noticed when I was looking at the those tax returns is that brad only contributed to the JPF one year – 2006 when it was formed I think with the money from the Shiloh pics. Angie contributed money every year (not sure about 2009) and in 2008, the year the twins were born she put in $4 mil+ but nothing from Brad. There was a $4 mil+ contribution from a Potter Co (I think it was). I wondered who they are. Maybe some connection to People magazine?

    Reply
  151. Guest1 said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:44 pm

    @Guest2:
    All the donations and charities get so confusing. The 2009 return for JPF is now available. Neither Jolie or Pitt made a donation into the foundation in 2009. In 2009 the Foundation donated a chunk of the principal of the Foundation. $2M of which went to the Make It Right Foundation. MIR seems to have the funds to make a difference, but it is taking too long.

    To look up the returns for either foundation:

    http://foundationcenter.org/findfunders/990finder/

    Reply
  152. Guest1 said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:49 pm

    @Guest2:
    I Forgot to mention. In 2009 Northern & Shell PLC made a $50,000 donation to JP Foundation. Northern & Shell PLC. “Northern & Shell was founded in December 1974 with the vision of becoming a significant force in British and worldwide media.” One of the publications they just happen to own Star Magazine.

    Reply
  153. Liz E. said on May 1st, 2011 at 11:50 pm

    Brad has contributed each year almost identical amounts to Jolie’s contributions using either his name or the name of one of his trusts/companies, Potter.

    The amount from E! in 2007 was presumably an apology for their employees breaking onto the Jolie Pitt property by cutting a chain. If you’ll recall the police were called and came to the residence.

    Reply
  154. jan said on May 2nd, 2011 at 12:07 am

    @Tamara:
    Yes. When I first heard this at 10:30 a.m., I just yawned and that was just about it. Re-election time.

    God Bless Y’all tonight!

    jan

    Reply
  155. rushdog said on May 2nd, 2011 at 8:29 am

    Hi all! Hope everyone had a nice weekend.

    IMO this clue is about both the RW and the Brange. It’s has a double meaning as do many of the puzzle clues.

    – Diana would have giggled over the pop & circumstance, the huge worldwide attention and all things British regarding the wedding.
    - Diana would have giggled over all the gossip about the Brange. (I seem to recall reading that she could gossip with the best of them.)

    Regarding a Brangie clue, I believe the first part is about JA the second about AJ with royal debauchery band (pitting, torture pit) placed right in the middle of the clue. Again another clue pointing to BP stuck in the middle: Mirror Mirror on the Wall (Star Wars fill in the blank) and Tuesday Etymology (Baba Looey) as two of the most recent.

    Reply
  156. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 2nd, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    @Sandy:

    Sorry Sandy but I’ve got to say you are totally wrong on this one. My friend went to school with William, he was living in the same house as him when Diana died in fact. (He has a bizarre anecdote he tells about that time, too sad to mention here though I would say.) Friend has always said that he is a really nice guy. Lots of other people I went to college with knew him or were close personal friends of the family (would come back from Royal Ascot talking about how they were chatting to Liz etc) and all thought the same. I’ve got quite a few links to the royal family. Freddie Windsor (minor royal) was at college at the same time as me (he was a arrogant prick though); girl I worked with was friends with Chelsy at uni (she’s a total druggie – quelle surprise – and used to tell her about how she was always getting matters of royal protocol wrong etc quite amusingly). Another girl I worked with at one time was PA to Fergie (she’s just bonkers – no surprise there). And I know one girl who is currently working at Clarence House and another guy who is Butler to the Queen so I think all in all I have ok sources!

    I do agree with you that the wedding was arranged though, or at least brought forward to counter the negative press about Andrew’s association with the paedophile and possibly because Liz may not be in the greatest of health who knows? Prince Charles is also doing PR right now as I know he is doing a docusoap type programme on renovating Clarence House. There all at it, some more subtle than others. But let’s face it, it works doesn’t it?!

    Reply
  157. Liz E. said on May 2nd, 2011 at 11:27 pm

    @Guest1:

    Just to clarify, Jolie signed a 3 year contract in September 2005 and it ended in September 2008. They may still have been talking about it in 2009 and 2010 but she was no longer with them during those years. Anyone buying shares in SJK would have been aware that Jolie was not renewing her contract. They began shooting Karen Elson’s ad campaign in 2009.

    As I noted in my earlier post trying to tie Jolie to a drop in their stock price especially after her contract was up is a waste of time. There are many factors that go into stock fluctuations and the apparel industry in Southern California has had a very difficult time of it. In any event, the drastic drop in stock price was after Jolie was gone so I suppose one could argue the price dropped so drastically because they lost Jolie. Of course I don’t think that is true either. No, the industry was just not dooing well and was suffering serious layoffs.

    Reply
  158. Togi said on May 3rd, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    HOWDY HO, AMIJA!!!!! Good to see you! My only question is in which manner was Wills and Kate’s marriage arranged? They’ve been together for so long, and she isn’t an aristocrat. It’s not like she brought anything to the marriage other than a real FRIENDSHIP. Unless both of them are amazing actors, I have to see it seemed rather obvious to me that they like each other quite a LOT. Haaaa haaaaa. In the long haul, that will take them much further than lust. They’ve been together long enough for the “lust” stage to have worn off. LOL. So, just wondering how the arrangement fits into the picture here.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  159. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 3rd, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Christ, who are you her lawyer?!

    Reply
  160. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 3rd, 2011 at 4:12 pm

    @Togi:

    Not arranged as in completely fake, just brought forward and encouraged a lot obvs. William knew he had to marry someone and produce an heir, and he had to do it in reasonable time. Kate seemed like good, reliable stock who wouldn’t be an embarrassment to the royal family and affect their future position so was encouraged. It’s not that they aren’t keen on each other, I’m sure they are, but his marriage was always going to be more than an affair of the heart – the future of the royal family totally hinges on it’s success. They are genuine I think but there are also a lot of people working behind the scenes to ensure their relationship shores up an othewise disastrous royal family. A lot of people’s livings are depending on the success of this relatioship – what would they do without all the British taxpayer’s millions after all?

    Reply
  161. Togi said on May 3rd, 2011 at 6:28 pm

    Ahhhhhh. Gotcha. That makes complete sense. And I can certainly see how and why this relationship is so important to the monarchy. It can (or will) make or break them in a sense. I don’t mind at all that there are folks in the background “encouraging” things. It’s nice they chose to be together before anyone forced them together. It’s one of the things about them that is so endearing. LOL. I wish them only the best. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  162. rs downloads said on June 2nd, 2011 at 4:24 am

    Hola
    Que palabras… La frase fenomenal, admirable
    http://easyddl.cz.cc/
    SuperSonic

    Reply
  163. [...] IUC World Exclusive: Royal Wedding White Gown Goddess…. [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2011
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Meta