IUC World Exclusive: No, No Nanette…Squirt Guns Mod!!!!!

Posted on April 20th, 2011 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Hopping the wag…squirt guns mod…jeans levanta cola…studded combat boots…Tea for Twojust tea for two…and you for me alone…No, No Nanette…nobody does it like Doris!!!!!

  1. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:33 am

    Yay!

    Reply
  2. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:49 am

    Doris is JA.
    Song Tea for Two is a duet in the play/movie No No Nanette
    Song is about a couple who wishes to run away together to a place far from the scrutiny of the world and raise a family.

    Reply
  3. Astro said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:57 am

    SRC=IAN, another BS!!!

    Reply
  4. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:00 am

    Hopping the wag is ditching school. Squirt gun mod is modifying a squirt gun?

    Reply
  5. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:08 am

    Jeans levanta la cola- wearing jeans pushes your ass up? or maybe it means “gettting off your ass”

    Reply
  6. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:22 am

    Oh my gosh, I had forgotten how Doris Day sang, lol, that is funny to watch that now, that man is old enough to be her grandfather. so, back to twins, a girl for her, a boy for him, tea for two and raise a family , so I am back to the gumdrops and lollipops being Jen found out that in addition to Tuesdays Grace all in pink she was also getting a boy , two for the price of one on that last riddle.

    I am so tired tonight but the video that Ian attached to this makes that much fairly clear.

    Reply
  7. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:22 am

    Lyrics of duet – Tea for two-

    JIMMY:
    Picture you upon my knee
    Just tea for two
    And two for tea
    Just me for you
    And you for me…alone-

    [DIALOGUE]

    JIMMY:
    I’m discontented with homes that I’ve rented
    So I have invented my own.
    Darling, this place is lovely oasis
    Where life’s weary taste is unknown
    Far from the crowded city
    Where flowers pretty caress the stream
    Cozy to hide in, to live side by side in,
    Don’t let it apart in my dream-

    Picture you upon my knee
    Just tea for two
    And two for tea
    Just me for you
    And you for me alone NANETTE:
    Nobody near us to see us or hear us Mm, mm, mm,
    No friends or relations Mm, mm, mm,
    On weekend vacations Mm, mm, mm.
    We won’t have it known, dear,
    That we own a telephone, dear…

    NANETTE:
    Day will break and I’ll wake
    And start to bake a sugar cake
    For you to take for all the boys to see

    BOTH:
    We’ll raise a family

    JIMMY:
    A boy for you
    And a girl for me

    BOTH:
    Can’t you see how happy we would be…

    Reply
  8. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:27 am

    Squirt gun modding

    “This Instructable shows you how easy it is to turn a cheap plastic squirt gun into a much fancier, more realistic accessory for cosplay, using faux wood finishing and aged metal technique.”

    Reply
  9. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:34 am

    @Harlow:
    Their office is also in New York 1264 Saint Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10033

    Reply
  10. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:34 am

    @Harlow:
    Halrow did you watch the video up there, the old guy is so funny lol

    Reply
  11. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:41 am

    @Kate:
    Yes – he was apparently billed as “cuddles” in many films!
    And was well known for saying ” evrything is hunky dunky”
    Is originally from hungary…

    Reply
  12. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:52 am

    lol apparently butt jeans are for white girls , according to some chat on some message boards, you only need them if you have a flat butt. why would I want to wear a push up bra on my a**? lol

    Reply
  13. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:02 am

    @Harlow:
    Hungary just seems to keep popping up yes, lol, well Brad does not look that old yet ha ha

    Reply
  14. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:02 am

    @Harlow:
    I don’t get the squirt gun reference at all, that is over my head

    Reply
  15. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:09 am

    His clue delibrately has someones jeans lifting, raising or getting off of ones ass.
    I dont decipher his stuff all that well but my thoughts are leaning toward-
    -someone one is evading reality (hopping wag)
    -making whatever it is that they are doing look more important than it is (Mod clue)
    -instead of getting off their ass ( levanta la cola)
    -and fighting for their fanatsy of bieng with the one they love and raising a boy and a girl away from scrutiny. ( song from no no nanette Tea for two)

    Reply
  16. Astro said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:15 am

    April 20,2011. Ian Your Dead Time is OVER…You lost!!!…Your BOOK”S FAILURE….Sorry MAN.

    Brangelina WON!!!.

    Reply
  17. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:20 am

    @Harlow:
    I havent done the squirt gun mod as your saying but I had a race car that had a pressurized water tank within reach of the driver( tied down) with a line ran up to shoot water to clean and cool the radiator and the damn thing has alot of pressure I would be scared to shoot people with it.

    I see lots of references to cars in regards to the squirt gun mod, they spray pedestrians with it, or people behind them, for what reason I have no idea, being punks I guess. Must be a car enthusiast thing.

    Reply
  18. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:22 am

    @Astro:
    LOL , okie dokie, if you say so ;)

    Reply
  19. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:25 am

    @Kate:
    Hmm… making a get away pehaps and blowing off some steam? ditching obligations..a rendevous where they get off their ass and run to safe “oasis” as the song goes???

    Reply
  20. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:30 am

    @Harlow:
    The no no Nanette lyrics tell her she can not go, then the next line says, nobody does it like Doris, that makes it sound like he made choice, doesn’t it?

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/no-no-nanette-lyrics-tea-for-two.html

    what do you think?

    Reply
  21. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:31 am

    I don’t see anything for the studded combat boots.

    Reply
  22. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:38 am

    @Kate:
    Other than the boots and the jeans are new craze , not getting the reference .

    Reply
  23. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:41 am

    @Kate:
    but in the play/movie she does go. and she ends up with her man despite many obstacles and

    misunderstandings..

    but- The play no no nanette has a different synopsis as the movie tea for two.

    Doris was in tea for two the movie based on no no nanette a movie and play…

    Reply
  24. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:50 am

    @Kate:
    Found this interetsing quote when I looked up both JA and Doris
    It was from the wise geek things to do guide..

    “Carmel, California, actually named Carmel-by-the-Sea, offers breathtaking scenery all in a quaint, yet upscale, beachside residential community. Close to Monterey and Pacific Grove, Carmel is known for its early 1900s art colony and resident artists and novelists such as Jack London and Sinclair Lewis. Clint Eastwood owns several establishments in Carmel and was mayor of the town from 1986 to 1988. Other well-known Carmel residents have included Doris Day, Betty White and Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt. ”

    Goes back to the song..Tea for Two..an oasis..away from scrutiny???? raising a boy and girl…??

    Reply
  25. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:59 am

    @Harlow:
    Hmmm, well Im tired. lol I guess tomorrow I will look at the one Doris was in since that is the one Ian is referencing with his clip up there. Maybe by then some of this will make sense.

    Thanks Harlow, nite … :)

    Reply
  26. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:00 am

    @Kate:
    nite kate sleep tight!!!

    Reply
  27. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 5:59 am

    Good Morning all of you.

    After a good nights sleep I feel ready to continue solving clues.
    Kate and Harlow, you have allready done the groundwork. It seems true to me. Now we just have to wait for someone who says that the clue is drugrelated. Probably tea is another word for heroin or cocaine.

    Reply
  28. Guest2 said on April 20th, 2011 at 7:39 am

    Here’s the drug reference – tea means marijuana and tea party means smoking marijuana. I’m really lost here as to how this ties in to Jen. Because of Doris Day and the girl next door image? At first glance I took it as meaning that brangelina is moving out of the country so that they can raise the kids without child protective services breathing down their necks. But then I don’t like to question Kate’s guesses as she usually seems to be on target. Gotta run off to work now but will check again later. Ian promised two clues!

    http://www.noslang.com/drugs/dictionary/t

    Reply
  29. Juliette said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:00 am

    Studded combat boots: Are those the boots that Jolie wears on her humanitarian missions? Could mean that the missions are all for show and something utilitarian is elevated to a glamorous status. Or someone (the Brand) is engaged in a battle and what is presented to the public is the glamorous image.

    Reply
  30. yamille said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:18 am

    I’m going to gove this a go

    Play truant – in the absence of a boyfriend/husband in her life
    squirt guns mod – turning what others have cheapened by constantly speculating (baby) into a reality
    jeans levanta cola – Jeans used to enhance the butt (Colombian ones are considered the best). Getting of her butt and finally doing something about it
    studded combat boots – originally part of a punk outfit used to make a statement or show agaisnt stereotypical image of woman. Doing it her own way
    just tea for two – boy & girl expected
    and you for me alone – something from him that will be their secret
    No, No Nanette – Film where Nanette tries to save uncle & aunts marriage by thwarting her uncles constant flirting and getting two male friends involved that end up falling in love with Nanette. ???
    …nobody does it like Doris!!!!! – Jens boy & girl not obtained in usual way, using ex to fertilize eggs???

    I hope I make sense and to me it’s all JA related

    Reply
  31. LC said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:19 am

    DNA “jeans”?

    Reply
  32. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:58 am

    @ Guest2 That was funny! I thought tea was so innocent that it in no way could have to do with drugs. And then you come with a whole dictionary that support that tea not at all is innocent. At last we get to know why the english people is so fond of their afternoon tea. “Shall I put the kettle on ? ” got a new meaning in five seconds!

    Reply
  33. Tamara said on April 20th, 2011 at 9:24 am

    @Kate:
    Well, IF this is about Jen possibly having twins, could the squirt gun be artificial insemination?? What do you think Kate, you’re so good at these riddles

    Reply
  34. Tamara said on April 20th, 2011 at 9:25 am

    Stella – I want to know HOW do you DO that artwork? I am truly impressed and cannot for the life of me figure out how you can do that!!! So impressive really :)

    Reply
  35. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 9:31 am

    @yamille

    Is Jen trying to rescue the relation between Brad and Angelina ? Jen has a lot of male friends, Paul Rudd, Adam Sandler, GB, JM and a lot more and she involves two of them. One of them falls in love with Jen. But who ?

    Reply
  36. Guest2 said on April 20th, 2011 at 9:34 am

    @Tetta:
    LOL. Yes, can’t you just see Charles and Camilla having their afternoon “tea”?

    Reply
  37. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:10 am

    Here’s my take:
    Someone’s skipping work for artificial insemination. The studded combat boots clue may refer to Jenny S — maybe they’re going to Columbia (jeans reference) on a trip for 2? Also someone’s being blackmailed (the No, No Nanette reference).

    Reply
  38. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:20 am

    @Tetta:
    tea was an old reference for pot. as in tea with goldy on laughin.

    Reply
  39. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:21 am

    lol i should finish reading before i post

    Reply
  40. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:53 am

    Hell, I am so confused now. And I thought I had acompelling arguement
    But last night I didnt mention this and i think Juliette has point.
    The Girl next door image and Rom Coms are what Doris has in common with JA.
    Their real personal lives were quite different. But IMO thats where the commonality ends.

    As for tea= marijuana..maybe?
    Running away to get high?
    With each other?

    I need more coffee

    Reply
  41. yamille said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:56 am

    @Tetta:

    I think there was something about her doing that before, but if this is realtime I can’t see it’s whats happenning at the mo. So many possibilities and I don’t necesseraly think mine is correct but there could be something in there that helps others solve this.

    Reply
  42. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:00 am

    @Guesser:
    Or maybe the jeans levanta cola clue refers to Columbia Pictures?

    Reply
  43. yamille said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:01 am

    imo, a B & A split has to happen for Jen & Brad to be able to acknowledge paternity. Keeping it a secret wouldn’t be fair on his family. Jen is supposed to be close to his mum especially and I can’t imagine Jen keeping her grandchildren away from her like AJ does.

    Reply
  44. Mamaugo said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:02 am

    Guest

    * Report this post
    * Reply with quote

    Re: Nat Enquirer UK -

    Postby Guest on Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:36 pm
    one mag published that they’re gonna married this week in Pitt’s hometown where he was born. And that her 7th tattoo indicating the place where Pitt was born shows their wedding place as well. And that this tattoo is Angelina’s “wedding ring” (she opted for a tattoo instead of a ring). And that Pitt badly wanted and begged to marry her for the past couple of years but Jolie was not sure. Jolie’s fax as usual.

    IS THE ABOVE TRUE PEOPLE?

    Reply
  45. clueless said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:39 am

    @Mamaugo:
    no

    Reply
  46. wtf said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:42 am

    UTC/Fruity…..http://ca.news.yahoo.com/true-hoax-body-dead-alien-found-frozen-wastes-053824292.html
    cue the xfiles music…….

    Reply
  47. louisianagurl said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:52 am

    Could the squirt guns mod have something to do with how the embryos were implanted…aka the baster?

    Reply
  48. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:54 am

    @louisianagurl:
    That’s what I think too.

    Reply
  49. Juliette said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:23 pm

    Hopping the wag: playing truant
    Squirt gun modding: modifying something from its original design
    Jeans levanta cola: The Spanish verb Levantar means “to build” jeans could be genes or DNA. Cola: seed or nut
    Studded combat boots: stud is a male who impregnates another for hire. Usually in the animal kingdom. Maybe the donor is in the military or something of that nature?
    Just tea for two – two children
    You and me alone – no father contemplated in the picture in the future
    No No Nanette – lead character tries to save her aunt and uncle’s relationship? Could this be a reference to Jolie and Haven?

    My interpretation is that someone has taken off time to get pregnant. The pregnancy is not natural. It involves a sperm donor and possibly doing genetic testing to assure the sex and/or genetic health. It could be either Aniston or it was Jolie with the twins, but there is not mention of a surrogate.

    Reply
  50. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    @Juliette:
    Wasn’t there a reference in the past about a place in France where there was genetic mod going on so that parents could make their babies look a certain way?

    Reply
  51. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    @elephant:
    Someone mentioned it and stated that the dr’s were going to work on a ship or something because it was illegal in France. Does anyone remember?

    Reply
  52. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    @elephant:
    I remember but don’t remember what clue it was.

    Reply
  53. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    Okay I’m going off in another direction…JA may be taking time off for artificial insemination. Perhaps her manager is trying to hook her up with a ‘father’ for publicity purposes (e.g., Cooper), but she’s saying no. She doesn’t want any more showmances.

    Reply
  54. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:57 pm

    Doris is a greak name meaning ” a gift ” or ” from the see”. And I think Doris Day sang a song “No body does it like me”.

    Reply
  55. Juliette said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    I could see Aniston using a sperm donor but she could never get away with using a donor of anyone in the public eye. Anyone could pull a hair out of the kid’s head and do DNA testing on it. I can’t see her using Pitt’s sperm. I don’t think she would ruin her career that way.

    @ elephant: Yes, in the past week or two there was news about a French company that was doing cloning and it was shut down by the French government since it’s illegal in France. The company was planning to take their business into international waters so as to be able to avoid regulations.

    Reply
  56. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    @Tetta:
    Yes, and Jen is Greek

    Reply
  57. Iona said on April 20th, 2011 at 12:59 pm

    Pic reminds me of Angie’s Paris cafe scene in The Tourist.

    Reply
  58. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:05 pm

    DIdn’t someone say that AJ uses butt padding? Maybe the jeans are for her?

    Reply
  59. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:21 pm

    @Tamara:
    I was really tired last night when I read through this, but looking at it again this morning I still feel the same, but that is a good point, maybe that is what he means with the squirt gun. I dunno, many of these are as confusing for me as they are everyone.

    Reply
  60. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    @Tetta:
    Tetta, I think because Ian is using the song, and showing Doris Day singing it , to her love, and it is about them going away, and it is about them in a relationship, and having children, a boy for him and a girl for her, that sort of indicates that she would be using the frozen embryos from Brad, and she is still asking him, are you going my way, as we saw with the mothership clue. At least that is how I take it.

    I thought your comment was funny about the drugs lol, you are a riot. ;)

    Reply
  61. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No,_No,_Nanette

    This is a link to Wikipedia about No, no Nanette. The story behind the show includes baseball player Babe Ruth. Brad plays a baseball player in “Cogans Trade”. I don´t know anything about baseball but I know that all of you who lives in US knows a lot. Can you find any connection ?

    Reply
  62. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:35 pm

    @louisianagurl:
    It does sound like Jen has already or the surrogate has already conceived because this is the second clue with a boy and a girl, after we originally got just the girl ..so I am wondering if Jen was making plans to prepare for a baby girl, and was told to expect twins, a boy and a girl, and so she is taking time off to get ready for that. Maybe having twins is a bigger push , certainly changes the scene a bit. I got a kick out of watching the video that Ian posted at the top , lol, but Harlow posted the lyrics, and here is the end of them-

    BOTH:
    We’ll raise a family

    JIMMY:
    A boy for you
    And a girl for me

    BOTH:
    Can’t you see how happy we would be…

    They seem to agree at the end, as does the riddle. so dunno, it sounds like they have maybe come to some type of agreement, with the “nobody does it like Doris Day”

    Reply
  63. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:38 pm

    @Kate

    You may be complete right. It´s just me that hope the question about Jen and pregnancy has gone a bit further so that one or two babies already are on there way.

    Reply
  64. Patty Anne said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    Terry Melcher is said to be a “clone” of his mother, Doris Day. http://funkin.net/sites/dorisday/ok.html
    Could this be about Angie and possible attempts to clone either herself or her brother? The ultimate ego trip. On the site where you can track celebs it said that Jolie’s most visited cities this year have been: Budabest, Hungary, New York City, N.Y., and……Paris , France where the cloning was taking place. I realize this sounds very far out, but then so is Angie.

    Reply
  65. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    Maybe that’s where the genetic engineering comes in making sure it’s one of each.

    Reply
  66. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    LOL Does she realize a clone will come out pre plastic surgery?

    Reply
  67. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    @Tetta:

    I don’t think we need to dig quite that far, it looks to me like Ian did not use tags on the last reason , maybe he was getting into area that his lawyers felt it was better not to, and here also so he tagged it Doris Day instead of Jennifer Aniston. It seems pretty straight forward though , with a few minor exceptions. I don’t think after all this time and numerous clues and validation that Brad is the father that we need to look for an alternate really, unless Ian screams that, and he hasn’t. I know for many this defies logic, it does for me too, and so they look in other directions, but if we just look at what Ian is telling us, and forget about what we think she should or should not do, then it is easier. Our very first clue on Feb 8th was Mama Aniston, IN the Pitts. That is where we started, Ian knew from the start she was using Brad to have a baby , and every clue since then has pointed to Brad. Feb 10 was the mental breakdown. We can go through them all, and they are going to lead to the boy and girl , all the way to here, at least for me. I just don’t see another connection at all. Not drugs, not Angie, just the subject he has discussed from the start, and that is not because that is what I want to happen, it is because I went back and looked at all the clues, lined them up, and that is what I came up with. so dunno, I may be completely wrong, and if I am I apologize for taking everyone off track, but that is my best guess. lol I need to review that sleepingdogsSM , not sure which twins he meant there now.

    Reply
  68. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    @Kate:
    At her age jens eggs may no longer be viable, her only option for a biological child may be old embryos that are frozen. May not make any difference to her who the father is she just wants the baby. I could see this being an easy choice myself.

    Reply
  69. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    @Tetta:
    That song “Nobody Does It Like Me” could be the MO Tabloid song for Jen. lol I swear they use it every week. This week, US has “Bradley disses Jen again-he’s just not that into her!” an obvious set up. lol

    While Brange made the cover of OK, (Jen and Bradley in the corner top right , IT”S ON, and Brad and Angie a little sidebar, new clues about a baby! -here is my clue, it is not going to have anything to do with ANGIE) lol

    Reply
  70. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:57 pm

    @Dream:
    Her embryos are already fertilized by Brad Pitt though.

    Reply
  71. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    @Kate:
    that’s my point it may not be because they are brads but because its her only option. we keep looking for a reason she would want his baby but there may not be a reason for him specifically. it could just be her only option.

    Reply
  72. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    @Juliette:
    That all sounds pretty close , except for the posted video that Ian has up, that is what I watched first, and that is what shaped my opinion, if he did not have that scene, the guy tapping his leg, talking about her sitting on his knee, them riding off together to make a family I might think she was doing it alone, and maybe not using her frozen fertilized embryos, and going with donors, starting fresh,maybe even a egg donor too, but that vid changes it all ..at least I believe it does unless I am reading to much into that, what do you guys think?

    Reply
  73. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:05 pm

    @Dream:
    I can see that, but why then keep asking, going my way, want to make a family, the love song, etc? those little hints, what is the point of them, if she just wants her own baby? If I were using my logic I would think most people would accept fate, use a egg donor and have a baby with a new guy they loved and move on with their life, but apparently that is not the case, because this way it brings in an entire back history, and baggage. That leads me to believe that the three of them are all on ok terms.

    Reply
  74. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL your a whole lot better at this then me all i do is make really bad guesses. my mind goes in the wrong direction every time.

    Reply
  75. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    @Dream:
    ha ha or worse.

    Reply
  76. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Yeah she is, but look at her, bet she has no viable eggs. shudder the thought, and all the speculation that has surrounded little Viv ,poor kid, imagine if something went wrong. We are already seeing her doing this to Shiloh. Good point though Patty, who knows what she could be up to, she seems to be off the radar, Yes, did you find anything else\?

    Reply
  77. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    @Kate:
    I think yours is the best dirction Kate beacuse your looking at the clues as a series which Ian did state he was planning…

    Reply
  78. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    @clueless:
    ha ha , less is more,and powerful !

    Reply
  79. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL she would probably have cat clones. cat clones never come out like the original cat, they are usually completely different.
    for instance you use a fat lazy white cat you get a yellow skinny active cat. It’s interesting reading if your interested in that sort of thing.

    Reply
  80. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    @yamille:
    Yeah I don’t see that either, but one has time on their side for that. Look at the stars that have hidden lovers and kids , for a good two years before we know about it. I wonder what Angie is doing, getting her popcorn ready to watch the Royal Wedding coverage, no one bought that the most glorious and famous movie stars in the world were going to have the wedding of the century Shawnee this year, (nice try Ang) so she has to have another trick coming up. She upstaged the awards with her big belly (with a little help it appeared from the costumes department of AMH) when she did not get a nom before, think she will pull a stunt this weekend?

    Reply
  81. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    @Dream:
    ah imagine what she would get then ha ha just sayin

    Reply
  82. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    @Kate

    Thanks Kate for lining the clues up. My brain isn´t so organized right now. To many people around me.

    If Ian already knew about Jen and a baby/babies at the 8th of februari we can add more then two months since then. Maybe the babies already is there as small featus.

    Reply
  83. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:16 pm

    @Kate:
    Hey weren’t we getting two clues today> and if so I wonder if they’ll be connected to each other?

    Reply
  84. yamille said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    @Kate:

    haha, I reckon she will try. I think I’ll record the wedding, and save the popcorn for whatever she has planned lol

    Reply
  85. JLB said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:45 pm

    Hi everyone, I just tuned in and read the clue and watched the video of Doris Day. I decided to write before reading all the comments. Did anyone by chance read some of the comments below the video. I love reading the comments to videos, news. It is to me one upside to our technology.As soon as, say, an article is published, a reader can immediately see how others who just read the same article think and respond…truly is a global community–just like what we have here with each other I guess.

    Anyway, I just had to respond to a comment that expressed how someone wishes that Hollywood was still like this and the writer seemed to mourn the loss of HW’s innocence and named stars that the writer deemed to emulate her idea of a moral HW. I responded that it would be lovely but only if it was the truth. I expressed that the problem is that all this loveliness was a facade. I stated that just the names of stars listed made me think immediately of so many “uglies” that were the truth that lied beneath–people living in the closet, people enabling and protecting a false image, organized crime, actors unions due to being taken advantage of by greedy HW execs–including the corruption and abuse of children, etc. etc.

    Is it possible that Ian is calling our attention to the issue of FACADE. It’s just a thought. Sorry if it doesn’t make sense to anyone else but it’s what I thought about while watching Doris sing. Doris was a very good friend of Rock Hudson and diligently offered her friendship to help him keep his cover and promote his false image that HW wanted him to project. I’m not addressing homosexuality at all. What I am addressing is LIVING A FACADE and how people of HW use each other to do so….willingly or not.

    Just a thought.

    Reply
  86. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 2:46 pm

    @yamille:

    Yamille, so I think you are pretty close, with what most are saying here–

    Play truant – in the absence of a boyfriend/husband in her life( but this could also be as Guesser suggested, skipping work for artificial insemination, Jen announced she was taking off this year, no acting jobs, so this sounds like it is saying Jen has cleared her calender, whether it is her, or a gestational carrier, maybe she wants to be involved)

    squirt guns mod – turning what others have cheapened -(that is true, the tabloids have and she seemed upset by that wanting to sceam it to the mountains when she is pregnant, so maybe that, or as Tamara, and LG said, this is the insemination method, indicating that the way she has gotten pregnant has been altered, what else would be altered? or maybe as Patty and Elephant said, genetic altering, maybe they wanted a boy and a girl, so specifically did something to make sure they got one of each, I know a couple that did that) by constantly speculating (baby) into a reality (agree this is about a baby/babies)

    jeans levanta cola – Jeans used to enhance the butt (Colombian ones are considered the best). Getting of her butt and finally doing something about it- (I think Harlow was thinking this last night also, I was lost on the ass jeans, lol, LC reminded us this could mean genes, that is good, sounds right, as did Juliette, she said -Jeans levanta cola: The Spanish verb Levantar means “to build” jeans could be genes or DNA. Cola: seed or nut.. so that does sound like this could mean she is getting off her butt, and building her baby/babies with the seed of man.

    studded combat boots – originally part of a punk outfit used to make a statement or show against stereotypical image of woman. Doing it her own way– (that makes sense to me to, she is doing it her own way, we are all baffled lol, clearly, at the same time, they make these boots for men too, thinking Juliettes comment here about the stud is a nod to Jen using a donor, not doing it the old-fashioned way to get pregnant, and so does this mean she is going to carry the twins or is a gestational carrier? Also she did say she would not rule out using a sperm donor, so we could go back to her using one from a bank, that could be a altered plan, (squirt gun, but it does not fit with the song in the video, but throwing it out there)

    just tea for two – boy & girl expected- (the picture is not from the movie, is that a playbill, I have not checked, but the the song she sings is about as you said having a boy and a girl and being a family and being happy)

    and you for me alone – something from him that will be their secret-(definitely a secret, betting Angie knows though and is part of the plan, paid off or something, and this could also mean, this is our, family, ours alone, not to mix with your family, something like that, but this can be taken many ways, maybe they went off alone)

    No, No Nanette – Film where Nanette tries to save uncle & aunts marriage by thwarting her uncles constant flirting and getting two male friends involved that end up falling in love with Nanette. ???-
    (the song tells her she can not go, but Doris played Nanette in the movie lol, not sure what this applies to when comparing it within the different arts , radio, play, movie, but overall)

    …nobody does it like Doris!!!!! – Jens boy & girl not obtained in usual way, using ex to fertilize eggs???-also the song paints Doris as someone who always loses and screws up, so hmm. Dunno, but how does Ian mean it? Tetta said the name means – Gift, so that is obvious.

    So as a collective effort everyone has some great imputs, I can’t spend anymore time on this, so the next shift may come up with something different entirely, and maybe IAN will let us know, are we -

    Cold- warm hot -

    Happy Spring, Hope all had a nice Passover, and will enjoy Easter if they do celebrate it ! Thanks guys for helping my muddled brain :)

    Reply
  87. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    @Kate:
    Sounds good to me, but I still think the Nanette reference is about blackmail.

    Reply
  88. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    @JLB:

    Well I think I totally agree that all three in this triangle are in a facade to some degree, absolutely, but the clue has to be about more than just that,” I think anyway”. I think the fact that they all shield their personal lives and put out a image they want us to believe is a given pretty much including Jen, because she is a major player in this triangle. Not saying she is not our lovely Jen, just saying that is the reality of it, and I don’t have a problem with the majority of the population believing in the innocence of it all. That is what entertainment is , after all.

    I was chatting with some friends and we discussing these three, at dinner last night. The question came up, “what if you happened upon Brad and Jen together somewhere, say Central Park, somewhat hidden, but you saw them, talking, cuddling, and you took a picture with your phone. Would you make that public or would you share it with your friends or keep it quiet.” the subject of selling it did not come up because these people are not those who would sell anything like that, they wouldn’t dare, it would humiliate them. The debate raged on. How much privacy do they get when they are making millions off of this image they have perpetuated to the public? It got quite heated, because a couple of us felt like, well, maybe there is a deeply personal reason for keeping it quiet and revealing it so blatantly to the masses could ruin something for them and their families, and a couple of us felt, boo hoo, they are multi millionaires, they should keep the back yard free of the dog doo. lol so it was interesting dinner conversation to say the least. Completely hypothetical. Where as most of the friends agreed Jen deserved privacy, they did not feel Brange did (after all they have built their empire on the backs of thier family), but the burn was , well we have one of each connected, so now what ? LOL and on goes the discussion. Like it or now, that is the life of a movie star. They are paid to entertain us, not to tell us every detail of their love life, but inquiring minds want to know, and they know what they are getting into. They make millions of dollars off these images that are sometimes completely false, does it matter if you like the entertainment, it doesn’t to me, not really. I guess that is a question each person has to ask their self.

    As for what IAN means here, if he just means they are a fraud, then all this twin business and revelations are becoming a bit misleading also, and I kind of doubt he would do that. I think he could have chosen any song for Doris to sing, in fact, and one connected to Rock Hudson, and has made the analogy before or Doris and Rock, but this time it just feels different. You made some good points though.(love to read your perspective too) I know it really bothers you, I take it a little more lightly , doesn’t bother me as much, because 99 percent of all of them are the same. ;)

    Reply
  89. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    O/T In the 11th hour I must ask: Now I have read “Happy passover” many times. What does that mean ? It sounds like something that already has been.

    Reply
  90. Patty Anne said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    LOL @ pre-plastic surgery. From what we’ve read of angie’s statements in interviews I’d guess she has no clue.@Dream:

    Reply
  91. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    @Guesser:
    By who though, who is blackmailing who?

    Reply
  92. Harlow said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    @Guesser:
    Kate- if this isnt concise idea of th clue then I can’t imagine anyone else hitting it. Good job everyone!

    Reply
  93. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:11 pm

    @Harlow:
    At first I wondered that too, last night , if the first part was about one clue, and the second about Jen having twins, but today not so much. gotta run ,have a nice day everyone :)

    Reply
  94. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:12 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I was thinking the same thing. It was in another clue before and someone wrote about the cloning. You can pick your child’s hair, eye color etc – even if not a clone.

    Reply
  95. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:14 pm

    @Kate:
    Now that’s a good question! Ian must get his info from some knowledgable sources, so it’s probably someone else in the know who wants to make some money.

    Reply
  96. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    @Dream:
    That’s just too funny!

    Reply
  97. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:18 pm

    @Tetta:
    Passover started Monday evening and goes until next Monday.

    Reply
  98. Kate said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    @Guesser:
    Thanks , I should have put that into the correct context. I know it begins at sundown on Monday, and some only celebrate on Tuesday, sorry for the confusion.

    You guys just do your own thing with this riddle, I could be completely wrong, follow your instincts and where the clues lead you. That is just where it leads me right now. :)

    Reply
  99. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    @ Guesser

    Thank You for answering me. i have never heard it before.

    If blackmailing is involved in this group of persons my thoughts definitily goes to Angelina.

    Reply
  100. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:37 pm

    @Tetta:
    Tetta, I guess you don’t have many jews in your neck of the woods. Passover is a Jewish Holiday that begins on the 15th of April and goes for about a week or so, with the last two days being the most celebrated. I believe it’s scheduled to end tonight at sundown. Ian is Jewish and he’s been celebrating this holiday. We’ve all been wishing him a happy passover in hopes he has a happy holiday.

    Reply
  101. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    Passover is the celebration of the angels passing over the first born of the Jewish slaves but taking the first of the slave master Egyptians. which led to the freedom of the Israelites.

    Reply
  102. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    @Dream:
    heehee used to date one of bob dylans cousins who’s still jewish.

    Reply
  103. Guest2 said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:54 pm

    @Dream:
    It also referred to oil as in “Texas Tea” from the Beverly Hillbillies.

    Reply
  104. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:56 pm

    Now I understand. I´m married to a jewish man. His parents came to Sweden after WW2. They have always celebrated the jewish holidays and I know about it as Pesach. We use to have unleavened bread at this time but it wasn´t any left when my husband visited the jewish store.
    I couldn´t put Pesach and Passover together !

    Reply
  105. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    Ian, happy Passover and a happy holiday!

    Reply
  106. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    @Dream:
    OMG – love Bob Dylan – everyone here has such great pasts and info:) If you ever got to meet him please say he was as cool as his lyrics! :)

    Reply
  107. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    Tried to make bread the other day and the dough didn’t rise, I was told it was because I was supposed to be making unleven bread so it’s a good sign haha. Happy Passover to all.

    Reply
  108. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    @Guest2:
    Actually we used to make tea from steams and seeds many many years ago.

    Reply
  109. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    @elephant:
    Sorry never met him but I am told he’s the nicest guy ever. I know the family are very nice people.

    Reply
  110. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:24 pm

    Now I´m back to the clue. A couple of days ago we saw photos of Jen at the set of the film she is directing. She was dressed in jeans and combat boots. We dicussed this and looked for if she could be pregnant. Mayby Ian mentiones this to tell us that the facts are up to date.

    Reply
  111. yamille said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    Picture titled Tea for two is cover for sheet music & CD of 4 piano duets
    Four cheery evergreens Tea for Two; Daisy Bell (A Bicycle Built for Two); Country Gardens; I do Like to be Beside the Seaside and Stephen Foster’s more reflective and contrasting Beautiful Dreamer stylishly and skillfully arranged by Mike Cornick. The duets are recorded on CD along with rehearsal tracks for primo and secondo players – so useful (and fun) when practising separately. These pieces are great for musical get-togethers and would make refreshingly different concert items. They can be enjoyed by players of intermediate level and beyond

    Reply
  112. JLB said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks so much for your feedback Kate, much appreciated…and I really enjoy reading your posts as well. You made a statement about how you sense some of these issues really bother me. It told me that you have read my posts and remember some of the issues that I have addressed. So thanks for your read and contemplation. I had to stop and really give what you said some thought.

    Okay, so, I agree with you about the 99%. I don’t for a second think that B & A are the only public manipulators, HW drug addicts, etc.I also don’t think it is the obligation for anyone to be forced to confess to the world private matters. I always tend to go back to people like Al Pacino. I love him as an artist–professionally but I always say I don’t like him personally. As much as I think he would be the most interesting and entertaining friend to have dinner with, I know me and I know that upon closer acquaintance, I would not like him. (I was raised since 9 with a stepfather–alcoholic, painter, quiet, selfish, genius, arrogant) Al, too, alcoholic, used drugs and hurt people who loved him. In an interview he told how Jill was involved with David Rabe “while she was with me” but no where in the interview did he own up to his constant infidelities that broke her heart.This behavour seemed to follow him in all his relationships. I almost choked on my tea while watching an interview with him at this year’s Golden Globes when he said “I do believe in marriage, that’s why I believe in commitment”. Commitment? He is another one where if you read his interviews there are so many contradictions but with all this said, I don’t think he intentionally chooses his words to manipulate and set up the public or play games with the public. I think he just is truly an artist…tempermental and lives on the wind. Small example, in his book he said that he’s only “been in love twice, once in 69 and 76″. He repeated this exact same thing on television just last year. I thought, Al, don’t you think about the women who loved you, who will be hurt, those women who had your children, and the young, beautiful girl you’ve apparently been with for over two years. I just don’t think that he thinks. The difference for me though, Kate, is that people who fall under the umbrella of “Pacino” truly love their art and they take their personalities and personal issues along with them for the ride. They’re just really imperfect like everyone else. I don’t recall Al ever using an interview or his popularity to smear someone else and lay a foundation for the public to hate and blame someone else for his issues. (Oh btw, Kate, do you believe in Karma. I don’t when it comes to rich, successful men. Al will be 71 tomorrow, still working and still able to have young, beautiful relationships. All I could think of is that I hope Diane Keaton is happy, Beverly D’Angelo too, and I hope Lyndall who was called his long suffering girlfriend keeps surviving her breast cancer ordeal.)

    I am a heterosexual woman and I really like men and there are “some” men in my life that I have great love and respect for. My brother being one…a remarkable, wonderful human being, father and husband. I’ve loved him since I was a little girl. We were separated during our childhood and it was painful ordeal. Regardless, I do realize there are good men but I guess I just really feel for women who have loved honestly but seem to get the shaft in this “man’s world”.

    When I go through things. I look to JA as my role model to get out of bed and do something, take care of myself, exercise, get healthy, work hard and keep my dignity. She is my example that reminds me to handle things with class even when a man’s behaviour can be so hurtful and spirit crushing.

    Anyway, back to my thoughts to you, I think that the difference is that the Brand has worked diligently to promote and protect their “image” yet carried this out at the expense of others. If they deserve their image and their place in the entertainment industry, then why not leave JA’s place alone and let her have her place? I still remember like yesterday, when JA was thrown under the bus and how every media outlet seemed to take the “career over children” bs as though it was fact, picked up the football and ran with it, without even asking Jen. Her personal life as a woman and her professional life as an entertainer was taken right out of her hands. Everything spiral and was out of her control.

    So back to the puzzle, I think Doris is JA and that like Doris, JA is the good friend who helps her “Rock Hudson”. Remember Ian’s clue “good girl to the rescue”. Doris rescued Rock several times by making public appearances with him to misdirect and mislead…all for a good cause though as she simply felt she was helping her friend. Nobody does it better? Well, who else is a better “Friend”, in fact the most favourite “Friend” than Jennifer Aniston.

    Could Jen be doing something that is career risky in the effort to be a loyal, sacrificing friend? At first, I thought that her rescue was perhaps financial help (similar to how I suspect she helped Robert Downey Jr. when he said her “help gave him a second chance”). Now I am thinking that Jen is involved somehow on a more personal level. Jen has a reputation of not walking away from friends.

    Tea for Two: I am from a family of medicine women–heritage on my mother’s side. I see Tea for it’s healing properties. Is it possible that this “healing tea” is what Jen is offering–again being the good girl to the rescue.

    Is it possible that AJ is sick and it is serious…it seems to be, she looks so sickly. It wouldn’t be the first time a sickness is kept secret until late in the game. Has Jen come through and promised the Pitt “family” (let’s make a family) to be there, to help, to support.

    Just guessing….

    Reply
  113. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:36 pm

    @wtf:
    Where is the video? (It wasn’t with the story).

    Reply
  114. badasschubbychickinminiskirt said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    click the link darlin. ‘like Doris’ at the end of the clue. :-)

    Reply
  115. yamille said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    @Tetta:
    Great memory tetta, it could be.

    Reply
  116. Guesser said on April 20th, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    @Tetta:
    Sounds good!

    Reply
  117. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 5:10 pm

    @badasschubbychickinminiskirt:
    I found that video…….I was talking about the ‘body of a dead alien found frozen in Siberia’……Hey Look, there’s a bunny…… ;)

    Reply
  118. Guest2 said on April 20th, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    @JLB:
    JLB, thanks for your insightful post – I always enjoy reading your thoughts about these clues and now you’re sharing your personal thoughts and experiences. Reading what others write is really is the best part of coming to this site and it’s unfortunate the crazies that come on here don’t see that.

    Reply
  119. Tetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 5:30 pm

    @jlb

    Thank You for your post. It´s very interesting.

    Reply
  120. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    I was hoping to get a riddle that made sense, and it probably makes perfect sense to Ian since he knows the answer, but I am at a loss. Hopping the wag…playing truant…or jumping on the bandwagon? Squirt guns mod sounds like a pointless, childish trick or joke? The butt lift jeans, made in Columbia, could have many meanings, especially with the “tea” clue… but it makes me think of Ange wearing a prosthesis, pretending to be pregnant with twins…OR, Ange wearing padding because she is SO thin. IDK

    Reply
  121. JLB said on April 20th, 2011 at 5:56 pm

    @Guest2:

    Hi Guest 2. I agree. I have to admit that at first I was skeptical and expressed this honestly, respectfully but honestly…that’s just who I am. Never been a game player. I have come to appreciate what you stated, that is, the sharing of thoughts, information and experiences from the posters. I just love how everyone seems to offer and participate in a collective effort. I also really appreciate that people just are not posting their thoughts to the air, but that other posters actually think about what they write and respond. As you say, “the crazies..don’t see that”. I have decided to just skip those posts and not respond, don’t feed the beast. Do you get the feeling that Miharbi is a self-appointed blog dictator. “Ok Miharbi, whatever you say, we’ll show love and reverence to the Brand just like you do just cause you ORDER us to”.

    What did you think of Kate’s discussion with her friends. The “What would you do” scenerio and question. I didn’t comment on that yet because I am still thinking about it. Interesting though, eh? Kate is quite enjoyable. Her short statement to me really made me think and she is correct, the situation with JA and the Brand really did get to me.

    I have always believed the words of wisdom “what you see happen on a very large global scale are exactly the same things that happen on a very small scale in the family unit”. JA=large scale; everyday women, not in limelight=small scale
    I rooted for her and admired her as I saw her rise above it all.

    About the puzzle, I almost decided that Jen has absolutely nothing to do with the Brand and is living her own life away from them…..but stuff keeps happening, and with these clues….I wonder

    Reply
  122. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 6:08 pm

    @JLB:
    I love the thought of global and small scale being the same. I see that too. It’s how we judge things I guess with our own experiences i guess.

    And you guys rock, the insights you bring amaze me every day. I would never see all you do without your help. I feel like a blind man trying to work out these clues.

    Reply
  123. Guest2 said on April 20th, 2011 at 6:13 pm

    @JLB:
    I am still at work so just picked certain posts to read. I will read Kate’s in more detail when I get home. I have to say, though, that this clue has me puzzled. I like Jen and I’d like to believe that she is removed from AJ/BP but if that is the case why do the clues always seem to tie them together. Whatever her involvement I don’t think it’s romantic with Brad. I think he is still involved in some fashion with AJ. If she is in such bad shape as some of the clue and the photos suggest I don’t see how he could just up and leave her. As for babies for Jen I just don’t know. I guess time will tell with that same as with the Brand.

    Reply
  124. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    did u get the link to work UtC? here is something to read….. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1378284/Secret-memo-shows-JFK-demanded-UFO-files-10-days-assassination.html

    Reply
  125. JLB said on April 20th, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    @Guest2:

    Hi Guest2, I am not at work today. Where I am, it has been pouring rain since this morning. I had a doctor’s appt at 1:00 and afterward just decided to spend the rest of the rainy afternoon at Starbucks. As I am sitting beside a window watching the continual downpour, I have been enjoying reading, thinking and responding on this site while drinking my favourite “grande americano soy misto”. Perhaps you can sense “reflection” in my posts.

    I am totally with you about wishing JA to be removed from it all. I know I have written extently about my “buyer/seller, public fraud” views, however, aside from this, JA does have a personal space with me. I don’t know her personally, but again, large scale/small scale.

    So how this ordeal and the choices of Mr. Pitt has effected her and impacted her life both personally and professional has interested me. How she deals with the obstacles and responds to the “poison” also interests me.

    In addition, I suppose BP who seems to be the continual teflon boyfriend/husband seems to have a personal space for me too. Again this “man’s world” seems to cast the die that, no matter what, BP will be able to come out of this unscathed, smelling like a rose and even able to bounce back/rebound professionally and even personally.

    Reply
  126. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 6:51 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    Yes! This is what “it’s” all about! But WHY? Don’t you find it odd that we are going to be passing through the center of the milky way galaxy the end of next year and Obama is basically shutting down Nasa??? We have had astronauts up in the space station for years now, have they been monitoring our procession through the the galaxy? Our govt officials KNOW something about what is going to happen….or NOT happen….WHY aren’t they talking about it?

    Reply
  127. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 7:09 pm

    And WHY is everything so upside down and backwards? Good is bad and bad is good? I can’t wait until it’s Hip to be Square :lol:

    Reply
  128. JLB said on April 20th, 2011 at 7:15 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    I just read your post. You’re scaring me. Isn’t it a prophecy that in the last days “what is good will be bad, and what is bad will be good”?????

    Reply
  129. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    ya know james cameron’s skytel went online last night and will begin its attack against humanity on april 21 .yikes!!!! all just a story, but we know how that usually works out. truth based in fiction/fiction based in truth.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647

    http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/04/22/killer-robots-and-a-revolution-in-warfare/

    Reply
  130. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 7:26 pm

    @JLB:
    Sorry….but I feel like this theme is blaring me in the face everyday. I can’t stop seeing it. I was trying to make light of it, because maybe it’s just me….being an old fogey?

    Reply
  131. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 7:39 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    It’s not just you.

    Reply
  132. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    if you read about the beginnings of nasa (an O.T.O baby) you see there is more to it than meets the EYE.

    Reply
  133. jan said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:02 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    Oh yes it is.

    Reply
  134. joanne said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:05 pm

    Ifs its goverment or organized religion I don’t trust it.

    Reply
  135. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:06 pm

    @jan:
    hi jan. the truth is scary. but we give them less power when we know what we are seeing.
    some of these cliches come up and hit us in the face. jack nicholson, of all people, reciting the line for a movie “you can’t handle the truth”.
    gives ya the creeps.

    Reply
  136. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:07 pm

    @joanne:
    there ya go.

    Reply
  137. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:07 pm

    @joanne:
    for good reason.

    Reply
  138. JLB said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:07 pm

    Okay, I’ve been thinking about these clues and comments, in particular, some thoughts about how the triangle may not be, or no longer be, one of animosity. I’ve thought about past clues, comments and reported activities of the three.

    I recalled something. Does anyone remember when Jen appeared on Oprah, seemed nervous and relenting by saying how “proud” she was of Brad and “all that he’s accomplished”. Many thought that Jen would come out and hold strong and answer back what was being said, in particular some comment by AJ. But she didn’t. There was rumour that she received a phone call from BP. I didn’t believe it and I thought “if so, so what, she just needs to say that she simply responded to AJ and her big mouth”. However, a reporter commented about how Brad was able to effect her, obviously did not doubt the phonecall rumour. That always stayed with me.

    If she is Doris, then, honestly, why is she still involved with them. I can’t imagine that AJ would invite or welcome that…peace perhaps but not a close friendship between BP and JA. Then I thought about past reports about how JA is a sensitive issue with AJ and has had fits about her. Didn’t believe it, but hmmmm. Does anyone recall the report of the man (think from India) who said that “Brad is still very mentally attached to his former wife”. Hmmm.

    Then I thought about the photos of the Brand in Venice when Brad was walking ahead of the family and not looking back. The look of AJ’s face. I almost caught myself feeling bad for her…splashed water on my face and quickly came to my senses.

    I have thought recently how, in the last couple of years, that smug look on AJ is gone. You know that look of the cheshire cat with a mouse in her mouth. Now, what would erase a woman’s smug look except for one thing–that is, the mouse of which she was so proudly smug has now laid a big egg on her face. (Hey, it’s Easter. If bunnies can lay eggs, why not a mouse?).

    Also AJ’s spirit, whether you like her or not, is gone. She seems to have gone from a woman who’s in control and takes what she wants to one that walks in the shadow of her man and takes whatever he’s willing to give.

    Then there’s BP and all the “poor Brad”, poor stuck Brad, poor Brad who gets his shirt ripped, knives thrown at him, having to protect the children, poor Brad whose “dirtiness” is really a cry for help to the world of his terrible situation inflicted upon him by the she-devil.

    Then there’s the recent wedding of BG where many have commented that Brad is getting ready to “break free” “escape” “claim his freedom”, etc…..all positive descriptions of his possible departure. Why is it that if Brad leaves, he is automatically congratulated on his triumph?

    So here’s my thought on all this:

    As much as it pains me to say it because I have so much disliked AJ since her big mouthed smear campaign and smug victory laps around the media track, but perhaps she is a…dare I say it….somewhat victim as well. Is it possible that she was led down the garden path.

    If all this BP/JA/embryo/twins/relaltionship is true. If there’s any truth to it, then something really is not right. If Brad has a relationship with JA then he can’t be that scared. AJ cannot have that much control.

    Brad is not just a zen master of the media but of his women as well.

    Reply
  139. joanne said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    Just because something is repeated often enough doesn,t make it true. When the media tries to shove something down my throat I know they are trying to pull the wool over my eyes.

    Reply
  140. joanne said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:12 pm

    @JLB:
    I think BP and AJ are alot alike. Its all about their image.

    Reply
  141. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    @joanne:
    Exactly! The more they try to push it, the more stubborn I get about NOT wanting it.

    Reply
  142. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    Brad’s dirty look has always stood out to me. He did the same when he was ready to leave Jen. It’s behavior have seen before. Women who are involved with abusive spouses and can’t leave sometimes try to make themselves unattractive, to make the abuser want to go. I get the feeling he may do the same either because his partners have something on him or for his own peace of mind to not feel like a heel for leaving.
    Make her want to go so she’s the bad guy.

    Reply
  143. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    and i thoroughly believe organized religion was meant to do what is has accomplished.

    Reply
  144. Up the Coast said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    Me too.

    Reply
  145. Patty Anne said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:33 pm

    You know I was thinking about this Brad breaking free, getting out, reclaiming his life, etc. I wonder if what has Jolie looking so down and out and pathertic lately is that too late she discovered that collecting all those children did not hold Brad captive, but holds her captive now. No more vixen, sex goddess, wild child – she will be a single mother of SIX. Who will want to become involved with that no matter how talented her vajaja may be. Brad can begin a new life (he’s especially good at that because “love changes you know”), no kids except for visitation rights or possibly he may be awarded full custody of one, but either way he’s home free. He had all the excitement, risk taking, and whoring he could ever desire crammed into those six years and can go on. Angie is done. She will have to reinvent herself definately, but will have to be very cautious of what role she assumes and I feel will find her life too dull and boring (Jenny S. says she bores easily) and either go off the deep end again, or worse. Not a happy ending. The drama and potential tragedy of it all will haunt Brad the rest of his natural life as well. Nobody wins in this, and the really pathetic thing is that they created this scenario that will destroy them. “That which nurishes me also destroys me” Very prophetic.

    Reply
  146. joanne said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:34 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    yep, fear of death and hate what is different.

    Reply
  147. joanne said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:37 pm

    The kids won’t win in this. It was shameful that they were allowed to collect so many so soon then drag them everywhere and sell their pictures.

    Reply
  148. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:43 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    a search for god is a huge joke now. people used to be eaten alive by starved lions for not renouncing their faith in one true god. people stand up for almost nothing now. there is nothing to stand up for in religion today but tradition. what was down and dark was taken into the religions to make them more palatable to the masses, and so a search for god lost it’s truth for the few who wanted it. everything in this world seems to have been indoctrinated with dark arcane beliefs. so be it.

    Reply
  149. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:46 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    i think those with no power have perhaps learned that lesson, and those with the power knew it all along.

    Reply
  150. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:48 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    and we keep coming back to the question of, “who will put those children first? ” this whole situation is terrible.

    Reply
  151. fffruitcup said on April 20th, 2011 at 8:50 pm

    @joanne:
    fear of death. holds people spell bound and frozen in fear.

    Reply
  152. V for Vendetta said on April 20th, 2011 at 9:24 pm

    @Kate:

    If that is the case Jen can’t use them.

    Reply
  153. amyactually said on April 20th, 2011 at 9:40 pm

    Not to dissuade from the topic. But, I’m getting artificial insemination next week. I can relate to Jen, ya know, in that, why wait on a man or the happily after that may not come in time. I applaud her for doing things on her terms.

    AI doesn’t always take the first time even on the healthiest of women. My doc says it could take up to 6 months/tries before you have a successful pregnancy. And so many women have fertility problems these days so that could add to the wait. I myself have endometriosis which is crazy common but I’m praying like crazy it all works out on my first try. I’m scared, stress, excited.

    So yeah, she’s a tough cookie and if her dreams have finally come true I’m excited for her. It can be tough.

    Reply
  154. Guest1 said on April 20th, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    @amyactually:
    amyactually, good luck to you. I hope it works out for you the first time.

    My sister-in-law is pregnant with her second child, both children by artificial insemination. She has suffered from endometriosis since she was 16 and has been operated on a few times for that and other female issues. She did not have viable eggs so she used an egg donor. In both cases, she got pregnant with the second implementation. She is turning 40 on Monday. She has always been overweight and I was worried that would interfere with her getting pregnant, but it did not.

    It is amazing what they can do now. Best wishes and keep us updated!

    Reply
  155. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:08 pm

    @amyactually:
    good luck, you will be in my prayers.

    Reply
  156. amyactually said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    @Guest1:
    Thank you so much! Hearing your sister’s success story is definitely inspiring and makes me deeply hopeful it can work out! Congrats to her and thank you so much for the best wishes. Can’t get enough of that positive energy and I deeply appreciate it!

    I’ll keep you guys posted!

    Reply
  157. amyactually said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    @Dream:
    Thank you ever so much:).

    Reply
  158. Pauly P said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:17 pm

    Well, we have less than 2 hours left in the day and no second post….HRH any updates??

    Reply
  159. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:22 pm

    @Pauly P:
    LOL maybe he was not counting on us getting to 1000.

    Reply
  160. Pauly P said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:29 pm

    @Dream:
    lol…don’t give him any ideas :)

    Reply
  161. Astro said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:39 pm

    BS!!!

    Reply
  162. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:50 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    Apparently – there is to be a “blue ray” hologram October 28th, 2011 that will have people believing there is a giant UFO above (tests of this devise can be seen if you google Norway Spiral – also been in China). There is fear mongering so that as a collective body we are all afraid. When people are afraid, it makes them vulnerable and more easily controllable, look what we allowed after 911 (the patriot act). So, apparently if you are following such things, those that “know” know that if we as a collective believe that something horrible is going to happen, we actually can make it happen. We have more ability than we are ever told. Many in the know who are not a part of this have gone off the grid. That’s not possible for everyone, but it’s a suggestion. Others choose to make a difference and not believe in this BS because that’s all it is, a scare tactic. Hope is always there, love conquers all, light shines in the darkest of places. Not to be off topic, but want to get word out. There is no end of life in 2012, it’s just a rebirth into a more spiritual world. Great archeological findings this year will support this. Religions will be rocked to the core, but faith in family and god will be strong. Obama – all political thoughts aside – is trying to overcome and work for the people. For some this seems strange, but it’s been a part of the plan for a very long time. If you want to make a difference, believe in love!

    Reply
  163. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    @elephant:
    Sorry, part of this connection with Nasa is that people know it’s obsolete and with the new knowledge gained this year, it will seem silly we ever had it. Nothing bad is coming, on the contrary, good things are coming and we have an opportunity as a world community to finally be free!

    Reply
  164. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:53 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    No kidding, in my opinion the guy is disgusting yet he is treated like a king…gross. JMO

    Reply
  165. elephant said on April 20th, 2011 at 10:57 pm

    @fffruitcup:
    God was never supposed to be classified by those in groups, etc. Religion will be obsolete and spirituality will prevail. Call it what you want, but basically speaking it means that we will become aware that God lives in all of us, in everything and his light/love is in us, not in a book or a church. There is no devil, there is no hell, that was just religion used to control people thru fear. I have absolutely nothing against religion at all, just stating what has been given to me.

    Reply
  166. amyactually said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:07 pm

    @elephant:
    Good post, love it!

    Reply
  167. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:14 pm

    @elephant:
    Elephant do you mind if I ask why you chose the name Elephant?

    Reply
  168. Dream said on April 20th, 2011 at 11:27 pm

    new clue

    Reply
  169. elephant said on April 21st, 2011 at 12:18 am

    @amyactually:
    Thanks:) Glad someone read it – now on to the next clue!

    Reply
  170. elephant said on April 21st, 2011 at 12:19 am

    @Dream:
    Good question, not sure if you will see this as the next clue is out and looks like you are out for the evening…next time I guess!

    Reply
  171. Tetta said on April 21st, 2011 at 4:47 am

    @ all of you

    As my day ends six to nine hour earlier than yours I wasn´t here to read the last comments on this clue. But now, when you still probably get your well earned sleep, I have read the comments. Elephants thougts of god and religion and the comments you did about this question are very hopeful. It was very interesting to read.

    Reply
  172. Do what thou will said on April 21st, 2011 at 7:56 am

    @amyactually:

    What are you going to tell your child when it ask’s for Daddy?
    Or perhaps the consequences of your choice – when he/she is being bullied for being a lab freak? or even your sexuality is called into question because of the strange conception. People will talk about you being a lesbian – this WILL happen, the gossip will be hard on your child – especially all the questions.

    Have you considered that the child may resent you for the decision?

    Your child will never have the right to know it’s natural Father?

    Can’t wait around for Mr Right?

    Just as long as you know deep down you are making the “right” decision for all involved.

    Personally, I think it’s very selfish. There are plenty of children out their waiting for homes, too bad your ego wants a genetic baby!

    Reply
  173. wtf said on April 21st, 2011 at 8:21 am

    Tetta your picture is beautiful…..we had SNOW here yesterday so depressing…

    Reply
  174. whatever said on April 21st, 2011 at 8:50 am

    The tea for two lyrics sound like someone who wants to isolate their partner…from friends and family….so they can be happy together w/o other influences in their lives, such as friends and family.

    Jolie has seemed to want Brad to herself, to keep him busy traveling so he stays away from his family and his friends…and keep the kids away from peers, or for them to form any lasting friendships…..just so Jolie can have all their attention to herself. As she doesn’t know what it is like to have familial or friendly relationships, she doesn’t want Brad or their children to do so either.. Classic control freak.

    hopping the wag. Truant. The kids are truant from school. A lot. thus why she wants to continue to be on the move…so the truancy officer never catches up to them, to ask why these children are not being educated.

    Jeans levanta cola, and studded army boots: Her humanitarian trips are just all glorified PR/Photo shots for Angelina’s image only. There isn’t anything that she really does to help those unfortunate refugees. As witnessed by her last trip. It was all about her 7th tattoo, that she conveniently herself posed for to make sure it got out in the media. BTW, those are becoming redundant, and the press is hardly covering them anymore….not even the Brangelina Bible, People, aren’t glorifying it anymore.

    Nobody does it like Doris. Jolie for years has tried to get the same type of respect that Jennifer Aniston has had in Hollywood. She will never attain it. No matter how much she tries to get the respect of her felllow acting peers, she is still seen as the untalented woman, who shacks up with other powerful actors to get her status upgraded. Hollywood laughed at her at the GG’s. She witnessed it first hand. If this causes Pitt’s stock in Hollywood to go down, being with her, he will soon exit. Everything about him is about image, EGO, and keeping his place in Hollywood. He will dump Jolie as fast and as quick as he did with Jennifer. In fact, I already believe it is happening. He is seen more and more going to events, traveling and being on set alone, more so, in the last few months, than in the last 5 yrs or so. I think Brad finally found his balls, and has really starting to put his foot down, regarding, spending and traveling….

    Jolie sees Brad slipping away. She can’t get pregnant, she can’t adopt another child, as she did in the past to keep him chained to her, so what does she do to enforce the notion that HE will never escape her? She tattoos his birthplace coordinates on her arm, to let him know that HE might be able to leave HER, but he will ALWAY’s be bound to her by those kids…it was a “threat” to him…in so many words..

    People Magazine, didn’t even have Jolie in their “World’s Most Beautiful Women”, issue. It is the first time in YEARS she wasn’t listed. She wasn’t even listed in the “Actors/Actresses that give back’ section either.

    Pitt’s look has changed, last year, he was being called “Goat”, this year he’s been called “Greasy 70’s looking Porn Star”. Jolie isn’t fairing in the media either. Being called out not once, not twice, not three times, but FOUR times in separate articles about her weight and her possible drug use. MSN just did a scathing review of her, her acting abilities, etc.

    The ” The SS Brand” is sinking. Will Pitt jump ship?? Or will he stay until it is completely sunk??

    Reply
  175. Tamara said on April 21st, 2011 at 10:26 am

    @whatever:
    I REALLY enjoyed reading this post and I have to say I think you are SPOT ON!! You have hit the nail on the head IMO!!

    Reply
  176. elephant said on April 21st, 2011 at 11:21 am

    @Tetta:
    Thanks Tetta:)

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2011
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Meta