Some Sweet Sunday Sugar…

Posted on November 7th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

ramone-143“When other little girls wanted to be ballet dancers I kind of wanted to be a vampire”…salty waters…dead bodies in water…candy or medicine…angie’s sanclemente…bird bowl for sale…just in thyme rehoboth…like cockatoos in spring…more saltwater tides…Johnny’s backside deleted whole numbers…singing for dummies…give me a sign…megamind forget me…go stick your head in a pig.
Te Amo, SRRC

  1. Patty Anne said on November 7th, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    Hello SR~! Good to see you posting again.
    Hmmmmm, is this saying Angie is an alcoholic in addition to being an addict? Tired of Brad (Megamind) and wishes he’d just go away? “I kind of wanted to be a vampire” is this a referrence to Johnny Depp playing Barnabas Collins in the remake of Dark Shadows? She’s still persuing Depp? Cockatoo’s In Spring mate like mad. Well, it’s for sure that Angie is feeling pretty good about things and it’s not due to her baby daddy.

    Reply
  2. Patty Anne said on November 7th, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    Johnny’s backside deleted whole numbers…..hummm. Angie is noted for her tats , and has tats for the longitude and latitude where each child was born …. numbers. But aren’t they on her left upper arm?

    Reply
  3. Patty Anne said on November 7th, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    http://www.popsugar.com/Video-Brad-Pitt-Angelina-Jolie-Kids-Park-Budapest-11858045

    Interesting video of Brad, Angie and the kids at that “playdate” in the park in Hungary. If they’d had any more paps and nannies surrounding them they would not have been able to move at all. I also noticed how neither Brad nor Angie were watching the kids play most the the time. Didn’t see Zahara standing by herself once. Pure photo op of course.

    Reply
  4. Tamara said on November 7th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I was kind of wondering if this has to do with them deleting the shower scene??

    Reply
  5. Patty Anne said on November 7th, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    That would explain Depp blocking the numbers of her tats….don’t know. It’s not as easy for me to read these as it was when we had at least one new one per week. @Tamara:

    Reply
  6. Patty Anne said on November 7th, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    salty waters = tears?

    candy or medicine = for pleasure or for treatment?

    Angie’s Sanclemente = Nixon took his privledged guests to his compound in Sanclemente, but where would Jolie’s safe place be?

    bird bowl for sale = hot tub? bowling alley? no clue

    Reply
  7. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 3:33 pm

    Bird Bowl: The packing of an extremely small amount of marijuana into a bowl for the express purpose of not making a full cypher. A technique associated with cheap potheads.

    Reply
  8. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    Salty: A word originating in Philadelphia generally meaning that you just got played, or are looking stupid, either because of something you did, or something that was done to you.
    So salty waters? Hmm.

    Reply
  9. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    Candy: euphamism for sex 2. something (usually flashy like a lure) used to get sex 3. drugs, particularly cocaine, crack, or E
    Medicine: a code word for sexual intercourse, or illegal drugs.
    Both seem to have the same two meanings.

    Reply
  10. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    Saltwater: A douchebag
    Saltwater tides??

    Reply
  11. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    Tides low: Associated with the verb of leave. For example, leaving.
    But it doesn’t say tides low, so I really haven’t any clue. :(

    Reply
  12. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    take a long walk off a short pier, go stick your head in a pig, lit: bash your head against the corner of a block of tofu and die

    Reply
  13. inthegray said on November 7th, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    GO STICK YOUR HEAD IN A PIG – Computer

    Share and enjoy!
    Share and enjoy!
    Journey through life
    with a plastic boy
    or girl by your side.
    Let your pal be your guide!
    And when it breaks down
    or starts to annoy
    or grinds when it moves
    and gives you no joy
    ‘cos it’s eaten your hat
    or had sex with your cat,
    bled oil on your floor
    or ripped off your door
    and you get to the point
    you can’t stand any more:
    Bring it to us,
    we won’t give a fig!
    We’ll tell you,
    Go stick your head in a pig!

    Reply
  14. rushdog said on November 7th, 2010 at 6:23 pm

    Is “candy or medicine” someones Sanclemente… (some type of drug their refuge)

    Reply
  15. joanne said on November 7th, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    I just hope jolie isn’t looking for a part in Dark Shadows, that would really wreck my childhood memories of that show.

    Reply
  16. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 6:53 pm

    @rushdog:
    That actually makes sense.

    Reply
  17. Patty Anne said on November 7th, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    Rehoboth, Namibia

    Reply
  18. Patty Anne said on November 7th, 2010 at 7:00 pm

    Well basicly I think Angie told Brad to Eff Off. LOL

    Reply
  19. Up the Coast said on November 7th, 2010 at 7:21 pm

    “dead bodies in water”….floating or sinking? (yuck)

    Reply
  20. purdy said on November 7th, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    Eternally 35 – that Angie.

    Reply
  21. Kate said on November 8th, 2010 at 12:48 am

    @Tamara:

    That is how that part sounds to me, that is good, I don’t think anyone wants to see her in the shower, lol. although I don’t believe it would have anything to do with Vanessa being jealous.

    Reply
  22. Kate said on November 8th, 2010 at 1:25 am

    Same here , rusty at this. Does sound like Angie is taking refugee in something, drugs, or maybe in her work, or a place, there is also a Just In Thyme Restaurant in Rehoboth, Deleware, but no idea how that fits, has some nice hotels near there, near boardwalk, maybe the bird bowl for sale is hint for please someone take this pothead Brad from me. except she could easily get rid of him.The rest does sound like she told him to just F off.

    Dead bodies though hmm, not sure what that could mean other than she bought that manual to study as a kid.

    Hey Sugar Sugar welcome back!

    Reply
  23. inthegray said on November 8th, 2010 at 1:41 am

    salt water tides sounds like Venice because there is a problem in Venice with that.
    give me a sign is a song by Breaking Benjamin: It’s thought the song is about losing someone, and that person did something that changed things way too much. He is choosing to stay with that person even if pain is part of the deal. Different interpretations to it.

    Reply
  24. lala said on November 8th, 2010 at 3:42 am

    wow Ian SZ was really who she claimed to be
    http://thedailyflogblog.blogspot.com/

    Reply
  25. lala said on November 8th, 2010 at 3:46 am

    http://thedailyflogblog.blogspot.com/

    wow Ian SZ was who she claimed to be

    Reply
  26. Kate said on November 8th, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    @inthegray:
    So how would that fit together with all of this? Would that apply to her, or to him. Brad sure seems to be playing the part very convincingly, lol. thanks ITG :)

    Reply
  27. Me said on November 8th, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    Why don’t all of you go volunteer somewhere and do something useful with your time?

    Reply
  28. anon said on November 8th, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    I don’t think of San Clemente as Nixon’s safe house so much as his vacation house, same way Bush had his compound in Texas and Kennedy Compound in Hyannis. So I would say her San Clemente is the place in France. Does it have a bird fountain in the yard? Is Sugar saying it is for sale? Did they ever actually own it or was it just rented. Rehoboth Beach, Del is a major gay beachtown sort of like Provincetown. So is she mating with a gay lover, like Cockatoos, and they’ll get a compound together near a gay beach resort? Not sure about singing for dummies but the megamind forget me does seem like she’s telling Brad to get lost.

    Reply
  29. Patty Anne said on November 8th, 2010 at 7:39 pm

    Hmmmm, “megamind forget me….go stick your head in a pig”. Get lost Brad, go get drunk. She’s worked hard to establish that rumor that Brad is a heavy drinker as a fact. I do believe Angelina Jolie is not bi-sexual but a lesbian, so perhaps that is what the Rehoboth is about and yes, it fits with the cockatoos in spring (mating).

    Reply
  30. inthegray said on November 8th, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    Is Hungary Jolie’s San Clemente? The vampire reference makes me think it is something to do with Hungary because vampire is derived from the Hungarian word vampir.

    Dead bodies in water either sink or float, depending on muscle mass. This is directorial debut is Jolie’s last attempt to stay relevant.

    Doing drugs in Hungary.

    Just things I thought I would throw out in case they make sense to someone else.

    Reply
  31. Kate said on November 8th, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    Well there is all that blood dripping off the baby dolls , gosh what is wrong with her? I know that means nothing here, but shaking my head.

    Reply
  32. Kate said on November 8th, 2010 at 10:31 pm

    Well I don’t get this one unless it is about Angie feeling safe in her directoral debut , not needing Brad anymore, him thinking still needs to save her and her telling him to get lost, but that makes no sense. so considering they are on a lovefest with the PDA lately.

    IDK

    Reply
  33. rushdog said on November 9th, 2010 at 12:31 am

    I know it may read that she’s the one saying get lost to him, but she’s the one who’s kissing him in one of these recent photos and I think he still looks stiff. There is an awful lot of PDA recently so I assume there’s something to deflect and distract. That’s what they do. The zip line family outing was not invasive pap shots, a complete set up. You have to wonder why. Maybe the reason will appear next week or maybe we’ll never know. I think Pitt’s there for the children and not her, no matter what it appears. “Give me a sign” – he’ll stay even though it’s painful, for them? for the kids? Does the first line mean she’s back to what she was before? (I don’t believe she ever changed her life.) I do believe the “candy or medicine” = drugs/refuge. Sanclemente = vacation home/refuge is the same thing. Does saltwater tides mean that the relationship ebbs and flows depending on who has the upper hand? Sorry I’m rambling here. I don’t think they’re a couple privately and this public sh&t doesn’t make any sense to me.

    Reply
  34. Tamara said on November 9th, 2010 at 11:08 am

    Singing for Dummies – putting on their PDA show for the world – dummies if we believe it

    Reply
  35. Patty Anne said on November 9th, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    “Singing For Dummies” is one in a series of instructional books for….dummies. Such as XP For Dummies, Vista For Dummies, Cooking For Dummies. So, is the Fat Lady Singing Yet? LOL

    Reply
  36. I'm on the bidet said on November 9th, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Like I’ve been dreading, I think the ’singing for dummies’ reference is to indicate that Brad and Angelina are going to cut a country-western album in the near future, using the names “Big Texas Bradley” and “Cattle Angie”, with Brad on the fiddle and Angie blowing into a jug. Of course since she is so physically frail these days, AJ will pass out after blowing just once into the jug, and require oxygen. Special guest artist appearances by George Clooney on a two-string banjo, and Jenny Shimizu on the mouth harp. Its the perfect holiday gift, if one of your holidays is Deaf Awareness Day.

    Reply
  37. Up the Coast said on November 9th, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Oh, Lordy, could YOU be funnier?? I think not :)

    Reply
  38. alif said on November 9th, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Song suggestions, anyone?

    Reply
  39. Tamara said on November 9th, 2010 at 7:39 pm

    @alif:
    Something by the Counting “Crows” lmao

    Reply
  40. Togi said on November 9th, 2010 at 7:40 pm

    No, UTC … I’m afraid IOTB takes the Funny Cake, hands down! That’s one of THE funniest visuals ever. LOLa class=”replyTo” href=”#comment-77677″>@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  41. inthegray said on November 9th, 2010 at 7:54 pm

    Somehow I think the beginning of this has to do with Angie’s mental illness/drug use. Angie Sanclemente was a Columbian model who was believed to have run one of the biggest drug operations (candy or medicine). Bird bowl for sale made me think how birds are notorious for keeping up appearances despite being ill. I guess all their recent PDA made me remember that as it seems they are keeping up appearances. And the song give me a sign is about someone slipping away.

    Reply
  42. vittoria said on November 9th, 2010 at 10:18 pm

    That’s it I.O.T.B.! You cracked it wide open and I for one cant wait to get my hands on that fine music. How great it will be. You just know Ho can Sang!
    @I’m on the bidet:

    Reply
  43. vittoria said on November 9th, 2010 at 10:21 pm

    19th nervous breakdown? Haha
    @alif:

    Reply
  44. Stella said on November 10th, 2010 at 12:35 am

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Your sheer genius!! Funniest comment I’ve read in decades!!! :)

    Reply
  45. Iona said on November 10th, 2010 at 12:54 am

    Lots of good ideas, esp Up the Coast. Here’s my 2 cents: could she have gotten in troube re drugs & is giving them up (bird bowl for sale). Or the opposite? Salty waters – tears or ocean? “More saltwater tides” – Depp’s next Pirates movie is called On Stranger Tides. Both Depp’s and Jolie’s private jets have landed at a small airport in Wilmington, Delaware, where customs boards the planes to check out intl passengers. Could “Depp’s backside” be Vanessa, and “deleted whole numbers”" mean deleted whole scenes? That was a standing shower sex scene, so his bum wouldn’t have been blocking anything but her front. Bird = Sparrow. Vanessa Paradis was a bird in a cage for Chanel. Give me a sign – astrology. She & Depp are both Gemini.

    Reply
  46. Togi said on November 10th, 2010 at 1:44 am

    Hmmmm, Iona. Very good ideas there! You know, there is also a Bird of Paradise, which is a flower, of course! But it could be a play on words. I was thinking about Johnny’s backside deleting whole numbers” as well and deleting whole scene numbers is just what I was thinking. I’d say great minds think alike, but I wouldn’t say my mind is great! LOL. It could also mean he turned his back on some scenes … meaning he refused to do them??? I don’t know. I can’t imagine JD being a prima donna though. @Iona:

    Reply
  47. Kate said on November 10th, 2010 at 2:42 am

    @rushdog:

    That is kind of how I see it also Rushdog. I have tried to run through this a few times. Out of practice, but the pda fest is just so over the top already that you wonder if Pitt is doing that intentionally. Surely he knows how ridiculous that looks.

    Reply
  48. Kate said on November 10th, 2010 at 2:47 am

    @inthegray:
    I keep going back to that . I read through the lyrics . So which one do you think is slipping away. Salty Waters is also a hip hop duo that does sort of dark exotic kind of stuff, some of talks about drowning, have to get out now, one song does. Brad looks miserable to me when he thinks he is not under the scope and she looks manically happy making her directorial debut.

    Reply
  49. Kate said on November 10th, 2010 at 2:50 am

    @Tamara:
    That makes sense Tam, maybe the dummies are the Paps. lol

    Reply
  50. Kate said on November 10th, 2010 at 3:02 am

    @inthegray:
    I think that song, “go stick your head in a pig” means something like , “go take a long walk off a short pier” ..does that make sense.

    Reply
  51. Kate said on November 10th, 2010 at 3:54 am

    @inthegray:
    I think that song, “go stick your head in a pig” means something like , “go take a long walk off a short pier” ..does that make sense. @inthegray:
    That song sounds like it may be from her to him, asking him to stay, and then maybe the forget megamind is him telling her to forget him, and then maybe she is saying take a walk..but the salt water tides indicates they work against each other and with each other at the same time so..maybe with each professionally, working together is the strongest tide and against is the weakest. so..two tides a day make up the salt water tides. so maybe they are strong as the Brand weak as a couple.

    wonder how many more shows he has to put on. cockatoos scream alot when they are hormonal in the spring. lol that would be her.

    What a life eh?

    Reply
  52. sucka said on November 10th, 2010 at 11:35 am

    @Me:

    Why don’t you? You’re on this site too…don’t throw stones…

    Reply
  53. Patty Anne said on November 10th, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    saltwater tides could mean crying salty tears off and on about something

    dead bodies in the water could mean crying for what they used to have but is now dead

    cockatoos in the spring – angie is in lust again for someone new

    more saltwater tides – more crying and pleading?

    johnny’s backside deleted whole numbers – I too tend to believe this means the woman who has Johnny’s back, Vanessa, had the shower scene deleted. What ever Johnny’s backside deleted , it did not hide, nor cover.

    singling for dummies – the PDA show for paps/fans/the public

    give me a sign – she want’s a sign from the new love interest before she takes action on it

    Megamind forget me- Get over it Brad

    Go stick your head in a pig – go drink yourself to death

    Reply
  54. rushdog said on November 10th, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    I see the NE cover has a “twins medical issue” across the top. I don’t think that would necessitate all this PDA. OK has “why they’re so happy” (neither are the main cover story).

    I think back to earlier this year with the director’s guild awards, superbowl, rough looking appearance in Haiti and then Venice and the balcony. She appeared manic back then. Something was going on with her then and she must have got it together for the Salt promo and this directing stint. Whether she has a medically diagnosed mental illness or is just someone who desperately needs attention, has a bad temper and who self-medicates, she will be easier to live with if she’s happy. This must play into Pitt’s demeanor. She does look a bit manically happy. I think he’s appeasing her. Anyone want to bet there will be another W spread with location photos to coincide with the film debut?

    @Iona – good thought with Depp’s backside = Vanessa.

    Reply
  55. Up the Coast said on November 10th, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    @rushdog:
    I agree with you on her “manic” behavior AND Brad appeasing her, to maintain some sort of calm or normalcy, at least in his mind. I also believe that Iona is on the mark with Depp’s backside, Vanessa has his back maybe? I’m also thinking that Angie put out this story about Vanessa being jealous of her doing a shower scene with Johnny, which I don’t believe for a minute, but in Angie’s mind……she always has to put someone down in order to feel better about herself, imo. I think that little stunt is going to backfire on her, the first time a reporter asks Johnny about it, he may graciously burn Angie good, and I’m looking forward to that! :)

    Reply
  56. Patty Anne said on November 10th, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    I saw that on Coverawards.com. I had thought NE was in Jolie’s back pocket since they’ve not been putting out any negative stories about Brangelina lately. It has been speculated that NE has a huge file on Brad and Angie that could destroy their careers if published, but I am guessing that after Brad and Angie sued NOTW for publishing the news of their separation agreement before they wanted it made public put a damper of sorts on that; However, it still does not explain why they feel so free to speculate about the well-being of the twins? Brangenlina sold their children’s right to privacy with the millions paid to them for the photos. What a shame.@rushdog:

    Reply
  57. Patty Anne said on November 10th, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    I saw that on coverawards. I admit I feel uncomfortable with the tabs printing stories speculating on the mental/physical health of the “twins”, but Brad and Angie sold their right to claim privacy with the newborn photos published in People. So many other celebs with families whom you never see in a magazine or tabloid makes this seem to be so wrong. Money for humanitarian purposes? Not actually when only a small percentage goes to donations, what about the interest accrued on the principal? No, not a good idea to set your newborns up for every crackpot out there imo. NE used to be anti-Jolie, in fact it’s been said they have a huge file on them that if published could ruin their careers, but suddenly they are treating them with kid gloves. Why? One has to wonder.@rushdog:

    Reply
  58. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 10th, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    IOTB – have you seriously never thought of writing scripts? If you have let me know and I’ll post my e-mail so we can get in touch. I know people who may well be interested!

    Reply
  59. inthegray said on November 10th, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    I think the part about Johnnie’s backside has been solved perfectly. After reading everyone’s opinions, I think we are being given a hint for all the recent PDA. I guess I’m wondering who is going to come out of that relationship alive?

    Reply
  60. Astro said on November 10th, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    Sorry. I have said many times. Those twins have a weird foreheads and heads, but If you think Angelina has a square face, maybe that’s the reason.

    Reply
  61. vittoria said on November 10th, 2010 at 9:36 pm

    I know, right? She’s got mad skills!

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  62. rushdog said on November 11th, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    Last night I was considering whether all these latest tab stories (the shower scene, AJ jealous of …, all the PDA, family outings and including the resurrection of the twins DS story) could all be a part of one big deflection. It sounds conspiratorial and I’m not one who falls into that line of thinking but…I found this at FF this a.m. under a new thread titled “insider information about Depp and Joli”:
    ———————————
    Report this postReply with quote insider information on depp and joli?
    by Guest on Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:57 am

    This was written back in march, while ange was shooting the tourist.
    to 788 @ 03/31/2010 at 12:14 pm

    you need a road map. ok here goes. there is filming taking place on a high profile project as we speak. both of the actors in question have asked for, and have gotten, very large paychecks. this film is costing a fair amount to make. what is not being said is that the studio producing this film NEEDS this film to suceed financially. the last thing needed is bad pr during filming and after, at least until the various premieres are over.

    one of the actors is supposedly, as far as the world is concerned, very much in love with his/her partner. you notice i say supposedly. however, the truth is that there is big trouble in paradise. the partner of this actor only shows up on the set for pr purposes; to convince one and all that everything is great and wonderful when it is most definitely not.

    rumors are now coming out that the star in question is making moves towards another co-star. THESE ARE NOT RUMORS. but you can bet that the studio involved, along with the director, are doing everything in their power to make sure that the reports are only thought of as rumor.

    no one wants any mention of this star being unfaithful to upset the carefully constructed apple cart; at least until the film is in the can and premieres are all done with. which is why those involved are making sure that the star in question is photographed with the partner as much as possible while on location. is this a big enough road map.Top

    —————————-
    I take this insider stuff with a “grain of salt” but I believe this is The Tourist and explains all the recent deflection and probably explains all the balcony pictures from Venice. I don’t think this the deflection is driven by Jolie/Pitt but rather Sony. They need this movie to be a hit which is why it was moved to December to capitalize on the holiday movie crowds. Salt did well finacially world-wide (and Jolie deserves credit for that) but that doesn’t mean it made a profit for the studio (another dicussion topic). The beginning of The Tourist promo. Jolie will again sell this movie using her family and Pitt and it will also deflect from any possible suggestions of impropriety. Depp’s backside = Vanessa. It all fits.

    Reply
  63. to rushdog said on November 11th, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    I found this insider information. I got it from another thread about the daniel craig rachel weisz affaire.
    But most people there came to the conclusion that the writer meant Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp, it was written back in march when they were shooting the Tourist. It was actually refered to Daniel Craig and Dream House. But that makes no sense. So we wanted to check the reactions of Brange fans and if the writer just mistaken his information. We don’t know really if this *insider* text is about Jolie, but it would makes sense. Sry but I thought you should know where this text comes from, so take it with
    “a bigger grain of salt”.

    Reply
  64. Up the Coast said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    @rushdog:
    Wow. Maybe I’m not reading this correctly, but it sounds like Sony asked Pitt to keep a leash on joLIE so her inapropriate behavior doesn’t ruin, or override the PR for their movie.

    Reply
  65. I'm on the bidet said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    Another excerpt from the “Everybody Loves AJ!” mantra being churned out by Angelina’s press machine. Once again, the ideas promoted are that AJ’s family life is idyllic (certainly, better than yours is) and that she is constantly surrounded by unconditional love from everyone around her:

    “Sometimes. I’m not the best cook. Pax is a better cook than me. Pax likes to cook. But I try to when I can. Any house that we’re in, we all chip in. But the kids are very sweet . . . so enthusiastic anytime I cook. Especially Maddox; he’s just this little man that’s very supportive of me—it’s like he’s raised me a bit. So I cooked them all breakfast before school this morning, and he has that kind of ‘Thanks, Mom! Good job!’ ” (interview for Vogue December 2010 issue, see http://tinyurl.com/29euayb)

    Oh, come on! At least tell a plausible fiction! The only thing I get out of this story is that poor Pax is having to learn how to feed himself. And I’m sure Pax’s tutelage of AJ’s cooking was limited to “No, weird lady, the milk goes in the glass, and the pop tart goes in the toaster, not the other way around”.

    -IOTB

    Reply
  66. Up the Coast said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Gag!! “any house we’re in”? “we all chip in”? No appreciation for the hired help, eh? Maddox raised her?? Why is she trying to blame it on him?? :) Just another day in her head :( I wonder what town her traveling orphanage will settle in next?

    Reply
  67. I'm on the bidet said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    @vittoria:
    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Lol thanks but no real writing skills here, just stuff that pops into my head. Plus, I suffer from ADD – Angelina Disbelief Disorder, in which often after I read AJ’s latest publicity prose, in a fit of furious disbelief I slip into a catatonic state, sometimes for days on end. Hopefully during an episode I’ll slip out of my chair onto the floor, because if I wake in front of the computer screen it can happen all over again. Unfortunately doctors say the only cure is lots of tattoos, profligate adoption, and spouting saintly gibberish about my personal life, and I’m not really up for any of that.

    Reply
  68. I'm on the bidet said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    Maybe Pax should feel lucky he’s only taking on the cooking duties – I’d hate to be the kid who gets her through detox if she goes back to the heroin. “Little Shiloh held an intervention for me, and it was just so cute! All her school chums came over and watched mommy go through twelve hours of dry heaves on the kitchen floor. She is such the little therapist! Sometimes she even helps Zahara relax while she is doing our international tax statements.”

    Reply
  69. Up the Coast said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Do I sound like joLIE then if I tell you that your “suffering” brings us a smile and a giggle?

    Reply
  70. rushdog said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    @Up the Coast:
    it may not be to keep her on a leash but to keep up appearances so the perception overrides the rumor/gossip/truth.

    Reply
  71. rushdog said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Well, since she forgot to mention Pax the last set of interviews she better get him mentioned this time!!

    You really do have great writing skills. Any more news on the country CD? lol.

    Reply
  72. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    You would know Mel wouldn’t you? You’re doing his PR after all. Sadly for you – but fortunately of course for freedom of speech – I don’t think Ian will block me for saying this. Keep trying to inviegle yourself with the ladies though – you’ve got them falling for it hook, line and sinker. Expect a bonus in your Christmas pay packet! :-)

    Reply
  73. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2010 at 5:13 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    I don’t think IOTB will be as sucked in by your sycophancy as others have been UTC – keep flipping trying though, you’re definitely justifying your pay cheque. I’m going to definitely chalk this one (i.e. Mel/you) up as their most successful strategy so far. Not that that will benefit poor old one-foot-in-the-grave Angie though will it? She’s going right under the same William Bradley Pitt bus that poor old Jennifer Aniston did and as all women who dare to be famous and successful ultimately do. You know what UTC/Mel, you’re turning me into a bit of an Angelina supporter – do you know that? I always defend the underdog you see against the big bad bully trying to survive at their expense. It’s probably not a great idea to make me feel so vehemently anti-Brad Pitt as you are making me feel, but I know both you and they are not smart enough to know that. I’m just giving you a little heads up though in case you might want to rapidly rectify your strategy before the boy-from-shawnee gets it in the neck. Just a polite warning. :-)

    Reply
  74. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    You defo have the satirical skills – hit me up, let’s do something. lol

    Reply
  75. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    By the way UTC, maybe you could set up your own site to push your “Angelina the Psychopath, Brad the Helpless Victim” agenda so that if and when Angelina wants to take legal action she can do it against the author of this nonsense rather than my friend Kate – have you ever considered that? Please do so, cheers.

    Reply
  76. Mr. Jagdish Patel (Motel 6 International) said on November 11th, 2010 at 8:03 pm

    Hello my dearest friends,

    Please visit my new location. Mention IAN for 25% your stay!
    http://www.motel6.com/reservations/motel_detail.aspx?num=1118

    Sincerely,
    Mr. Jagdish Patel

    Reply
  77. rushdog said on November 11th, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    re: “turning me into a bit of an Angelina supporter”

    Don’t take that thought too far! I will say Jolie has taken the brunt of the criticism in all of this. He really needs to own up. But I guess it’s survival of the fittest and time will give us the answer.

    Reply
  78. rushdog said on November 11th, 2010 at 9:51 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    So Kate’s in charge of the other site and will be the one that takes the hit if posters aren’t careful about what they say and how they say it? Kate’s a considerate poster and doesn’t deserve that.

    Reply
  79. inthegray said on November 12th, 2010 at 12:09 am

    All that and it ends with “… Just a polite warning?” There wasn’t a polite thing about it and your “polite warning” was threatening as hell IMO. I guess if Ian is OK with people threatening others on his site then you should go for it. Let him take the rap for your bullying.

    What do you do in a real crisis if something like thinking Mel/UTC are BP’s PR sends you into such a fit that it is not a good idea to make YOU so vehemently anti-Brad Pitt? If you could do anything about all you’ve threatened to expose over the years you would have done it by now despite your busy career. Get over yourself.

    Reply
  80. Kate said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:15 am

    @rushdog:
    Hi Rushdog, thank you , that was very sweet. This has been quite a day, for what started off to be a day of remembrance for those we hold dear, that have gone before us with such grace and bravery , not just from my country but worldwide, it saddens me to see all this drama. I have been in and out, my father was in surgery today and things are a bit sensitive this week for me there and have been so this whole thing is not very important to me really. I don’t own the blog , and I am not really in charge either. That seems to have grown into a story of it’s own. It is really a community type blog, so there is the confusion and while I know one may argue that, I am aware of the true specifics. Posters are accountable on any blog for their own words, that is how it works in the United States, and when one writes a editorial then that is all it is unless one can prove malicious intent to defame, and then the bar is much much higher for those in the public than us as individuals. That is how it works in the United States.

    We really are just a group that are chatting care free, not interested in solving any problems or holding anyone accountable, at least I am not, nor am I interested in debating or arguing with anyone either. It takes quite a bit to upset me, for me to stay upset, I forgive easy, don’t hold grudges because I suppose I have too many other things going on and this is just a little blip on the screen of entertainment. I won’t engage in any of this,and majority rules. I am not going to defend any of the accusations made (against me or others, I think I may have figured this all out by now, but it is now over) because none of that should have been brought here anyway or taken over to FF or anywhere else, so I will just say, all the best guys.

    Love to Ian, my apologies this was brought here. Maybe I will check in again in a few weeks. Hope your family situation is improving by then.

    Have a nice Thanksgiving!

    Thanks again RD~

    Reply
  81. joanne said on November 12th, 2010 at 8:06 am

    I think Jolie needs a new triangle to stay revelant in the rags and made a play for Depp. I also think Depp loves his kids and wouldn’t make them ragmag fodder and if he encouraged Jolie thats what would happen. Isn’t that why Jolie hates Ryder? Depp chose her over Jolie. Anyway, I am hoping Depp respects his family more than cheap thrills and getting dark with the holey one.

    Reply
  82. Tamara said on November 12th, 2010 at 9:43 am

    @Kate:
    OMG What a load of “Much Ado About Nothing” I really like UTC ….YES I DO!!! I cannot stand to see someone getting bashed for NO REASON – okay Keane, you didn’t like her post – So What? I mean really – is it that important to you? You could have just said: I don’t like this post so I’m not going to comment anymore. See, thats what I don’t understand. Does it really matter so much that you needed to spew it all over not one but THREE different blogs? I just don’t feel as strongly about all this as you do so I don’t know how it could possibly be so important. And as far as Mel and UTC being one and the same, which I know they are NOT – BUT………IF they were – what possible difference could it make? I like Mel alot and I like UTC alot too so if they were one person than I would like them doubly! hahaha Lets all just lighten up, this is not that important in the whole scheme of things is it?? Ian – I must apologize to you, I’m so sorry this got spilled over to your site, but alas, you are our home base so I guess it was inevitable. Hope everything is alright with you hun! Lots of prayers and hugs.xoxoxo

    Reply
  83. Patty Anne said on November 12th, 2010 at 10:05 am

    Rushdog your take on Kate is dead on. Kate is a gentle soul, a forgiving, understanding and tolerant woman. She above all does not deserve to be made a target of one woman’s wrath over….well, honestly I don’t see what was so imposrtant to Keane about not agreeing with UTC’s post to enrage her to this extent, but there it is. I have not seen such a childish tantrem from an adult in all my life before this one. I think there must be more in Keane’s mind than just disagreeing with an author’s OPINION. My God~! Does anyone think this outburst and multiple blog bashing acceptable? I certainly don’t and at the end of the day Keane owes some apologies, but we all know that will never happen. This outburst over nothing proves that.

    As Kate explained, and it upsets me that she should be made to feel an explaination is owed anyway, the blog is a tiny communitity of women who share opinions and stories for ENTERTAINMENT only. We have no insiders, we are not interested in hits or in adverts…..and Keane knew this from the beginning. I find her attacking Kate on three different blogs unforgivable as any reasonable person would.

    Kate prayers to you and your family, so sorry Keane’s ego got ahead of your troubles at this time. God Bless you.

    Ian, prayers to you and your family also. Looking forward to our homeroom returning to normal. SR is doing great, but we miss you.

    Keane. Quit attacking others who don’t think the same way you do about something. You are wrong sometimes you know, and it’s far better to have an open mind than and possibly learn tolerance of those who disagree with your thoughts. Good luck!

    Reply
  84. Tinkuy said on November 12th, 2010 at 11:18 am

    Ladies, congratulations for finally realizing what Keane is all about & criticizing her.

    Reply
  85. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate hun, if you’re a community blog then you’ll all be liable for it then. I wonder if UTC/Mel would post those things on her blog? I suspect not. I’ve e-mailed you privately about this hun and have your best interests at heart. Please just don’t say I didn’t warn you. All the best.

    Reply
  86. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @Tamara:

    Hi Tam – I don’t think it’s acceptable to go about labelling people with serious psychological conditions when not a single one of us has seen the proof of that. Ian is the only person who has seen that proof so I think the most you can say is: “Angelina Jolie was diagnosed as a psychopath as a teenager by her school psychiatrist” or whatever the facts of the matter were. I think it is fundamentally wrong to go around labelling people as being one thing or another and determining people by a diagnosis given to them in their teenage years. I think it is unethical, malicious and unacceptable to perpetuate it on internet forums. UTC made that post not once but twice in a matter of days which made it doubly unacceptable and yes, that bothers me a lot. I don’t think I could ever dislike anyone – celebrity or otherwise – enough to go around trying to destroy their reputation that much. What is being done to Angelina is exactly the same thing that was being done to Jen after her split which I found absolutely disgusting and made me start writing about the subject in the first place. Whatever you think about Mel/UTC I am telling you now that she is no innocent and knows exactly what she is doing. And seeing as we have freedom of speech in society within reasonable grounds I will say exactly what I please about the matter, where I want and when I want, which I’m sure Ian would respect totally. And if that loses me a couple of internet friends in the process then sadly, so be it. All the best.

    Reply
  87. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Hi Patty Anne – that was completely rude as usual, and you are also totally wrong in what you said. Kate has never been my target and never will be, you know nothing about my motivations and have no understanding of what is going on here. I am glad that that draws an end to our acquaintance. Thank you.

    Reply
  88. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    Oh get over it James, for once I am on your side!

    Reply
  89. Patty Anne said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    The honor is mine completely, so Thank You.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  90. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Patty Anne that was so childish and unnecessay, I can’t believe I am talking to a grown woman! Please can you just drop this now because I honestly am just not interested in engaging with you any further. I only care about the stories here and was never looking to form lasting friendships with people I will probably never meet. It really is like a storm in a thimble and I am so over it!

    Reply
  91. Tamara said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    …..Right…….so now that we’ve all had our say…..let’s move on, there’s nothing to see here.

    Reply
  92. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    @rushdog:

    Hi rushdog – I’m trying to protect Kate, was not attacking or threatening her in any way – have you all gone mad?!

    Reply
  93. Tamara said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Oh for gods sake Keane – we’ve said worse things about them than AJ is a psychopath on this very blog! What exactly is the problem, cos I know for a fact that we’ve said Waaaaaaay worse things than that!!!

    Reply
  94. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    @inthegray:

    Hi inthegray – thanks for your nice message. I don’t know you and you don’t know me. You know nothing about what is going on here, why I am saying what I’m saying and what my motivations are. You don’t know anything about my career or what I might or might not be planning to do with this story and in what form. You also don’t understand the difficulties surrounding getting this sort of thing out in terms of legals and also market demand. Hope this helps you, please now leave me alone, thanks.

    Reply
  95. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    @Tamara:

    Tam – can we just leave it now, honestly and act like we never ever made each other’s acquaintance? I have said what I have to say, you have all misinterpreted it to the nth degree and we aren’t friends any more because of that. It’s a shame but these things happen in life and we obviously weren’t the right sort of people to be friends in the first place. I don’t think there’s any more to say than that and I’d rather wish you all the best and move on without any further nastiness if that is ok with you.

    Reply
  96. Tamara said on November 12th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Keane!!! I wasn’t referencing our “friendship” or as you like to call it, a “blip on the internet” or some such thing. I was referring to you having some kind of problem with a really good post alleging that AJ is a frickin’ psychopath!! (Which I am inclined to believe that YES she is!) I have come to terms with the friendship thing thank-you-very-much you have made it clear on several blogs now so I’m QUITE clear on that.

    Reply
  97. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    @Tamara:

    Tam hon you caused it – you were the one who misinterpreted my intentions and said some offensive things to me, and you were the one who dropped me – not the other way around! I have had to accept that so of course in response to direct questioning about it I will say it! It’s cool ok, we do not know each other in person so it is absolutely impossible for me to explain this to you in person and I cannot get through to anyone so I give up! You have chosen to believe the words of someone new you have made the acquaintance of and not someone you have been friendly with for some time and I cannot do anything about that because we live on dfferent sides of the Atlantic! The psychopath story, if I’ve said it once I’ve said it a thousand times – I refuse to give a psychological diagnosis on someone I have never even met, particularly seeing as I am not a trained psychologist! None of the psychologists I know would ever do this in a million years and it is totally unethical to do so, especially from a group of arm chair psychologists! Suggest aspects of someone’s character yes, but a medical diagnosis – no way! If Ian has seen a psychological report for AJ in which she was diagnosed as such as a teenager by her schook shrink then we can say she was diagnosed as such as a teenager. But I am reluctant to tar a minor with the brush of “psychopath” for the rest of her life when I do not know her of have seen that psychological report! Just because someone has a mental illness doesn’t mean they are just written off for the rest of their life as such and it makes me extremely uncomfortable to do that to another person, no matter what they have done in their life. I believe everyone is capable of change and can be worked with and helped in their life and shouldn’t be stigmatised by a mental health diagnosis. The things that UTC was writing on your blog were beyond the pale in terms of the assumptions she was making and the lack of evidence she had for any of the things she was saying. IT IS NOT RIGHT and honestly I’d rather die without a single friend than allow that sort of thing to be said without challenge. You can hate me all you want but my conscience is clear on this and I have stood by the ethical values that determine everything I do. Not ego, not malice, not spite, ETHICS. I hope I have made that clear. And please, seriously, all of you, be careful not to get sued. That blog may just be for your entertainment but it is in the public forum and is subject to all the same laws as other forms of media are. And internet laws are changing all the time with every new test case that is launched. People working in the media are aware of this so please be aware of it too!

    Reply
  98. alif said on November 12th, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    When I read this, I wondered why San Clemente, over other well-known presidential getaways like Hyannis Port. The Nixon connection is baffling.
    Singing for dummies instantly made me think of karaoke. I wouldn’t call the listerners “dummies”, however.’
    They are the most tolerant and enthusiastic listeners, ever.
    But there are semi-professionals who tour these bars. And there are contests, which spoils it for the rest of us who just want to express our “talents”.
    Has anyone tried karaoke? What did you sing?
    I once did “Will You Love Me, Tomorrow”, and afterwards, a blonde said to me, “Good job, Al B. Goode”.
    But I’m not a habitue, at all.

    Reply
  99. I'm on the bidet said on November 12th, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    @alif:
    How about I send a virtual IOTB to do the Karaoke for me (I can guarantee you the dancing would be better that way)? In Japan, people are apparently going to concerts to watch a 3D holographic anime lead singer, called “Hatsune Miku”. Here she is singing “Po Pi Po” which is about vegetable juice:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMtzNv7pqfA

    -IOTB

    Reply
  100. rushdog said on November 12th, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    No I haven’t gone mad. I understood exactly what you were doing and I assumed someone else had gone too far and put Kate at risk. I lurked here quite a while before ever posting and long enough to know these “cyber fights” rear their ugly head periodically. I read here because I like the posters and that includes you. When you’re on topic you can be excellent and I don’t disagree about the need to be careful when an opinion based on personal experience strays into a lay person medical diagnosis with damaging consequences all around.

    Oh and regarding supporting the underdog: don’t forget the real underdogs – six children and some of the most vulnerable people on earth. She’s built her current status on the premise that she changed her life using those underdogs as marketing tools to do it. IMO both Jolie and Pitt are accountable.

    Reply
  101. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    @rushdog:

    Oh ok I get it I’m sorry – got you mixed up with the pack of ugly posts there! And no-one is threatening Kate don’t worry but they are exploiting her and she could potentially end up in a lot of trouble because of what they are saying which I am trying to warn her about. And ITA with you – Jolie and Pitt are both accountable and always will be and I will resist every attempt for one of them to try to get away with it at all costs! And don’t worry – I will never be an Angie supporter – that’s one fact we can definitely rely on in all of this!

    Reply
  102. Patty Anne said on November 12th, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    So….has anyone figured out this SR riddle yet? Could it be that for publicity purposes for The Tourist coming out next month, someone is putting out untrue stories that Angie and Johnny are interested in one another? The illicit affair between she and Brad was what powered the publicity for MAMS but it didn’t seem to help that much. I see nearly all of Angie’s recent films are on HBO now.

    Reply
  103. Patty Anne said on November 12th, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    Oh, one small point. For those who do not know where the information that Angelina Jolie was diagnosed a psychopath came from – it came from IUC and was published in Ian’s book – Brangelina; The Untold Story, page 38 , bottom paragraph. His book was published last year, plenty of time for Angelina to object and sue don’t you think?

    Reply
  104. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Patty Anne – he said he saw a psychological report in which she was diagnosed as a teenager. You are assuming that that means she would still be diagnosed as one now. While that may be your personal experience and that of others it does not necessarily hold true for everyone and you don’t know on what basis she was diagnosed as such. Think about trying to stand up the “Angelina Jolie is a psychopath” comment in a court of law – could you do that? And if you could, could you still prove that by tarring her with the same brush she was tarred with as a teenager – an image she has obviously tried very hard to escape as an adult and in her career – that what you were doing wasn’t an unjust and malicious invasion of her privacy? (Please see the Max Mosley/NOTW test case for this – they had him on tape and had all the evidence but he still won). Libel laws are changing all the time, every time someone launches a test case like this and wins, everything changes. Please be aware that when you are saying something as defamatory as “X is a pyschopath” – especially when X is a very famous, high profile, public figure – you are making yourself vulnerable to that action. Your blog is public and it is as subject to these threats as any other form of media are – I am just asking that you try to bear this in mind, not trying to score points. Many thanks, K.

    Reply
  105. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 6:01 pm

    Ok whatevers with this – I think I just got my first series commissioned at Channel 4 – woo hoo!!!!! Yay for me. Ha ha ha x

    Reply
  106. water hold the lemon please said on November 12th, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    @Tinkuy:
    Yup, took a while didn’t it?

    Keane your full of crap. If I wanted to protect a friend of mine I would communicate to them PRIVATELY.
    If you thought that Kate said something that might harm her WHY re-publish it or broadcast it on several other sights?

    Reply
  107. Togi said on November 12th, 2010 at 7:20 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    WHOOOOOO HOOO! Congrats, Keane. And for the record, I haven’t seen any threats anywhere. Just a friend tenanciously sticking up for friends. That’s my opinion and I’m sticking it to it.

    Reply
  108. Togi said on November 12th, 2010 at 7:22 pm

    Hmmmmmm. Do you think the Nixon/Clemente reference could suggest a potential Brangelinagate?????????? Now, wouldn’t THAT be something???? @alif:

    Reply
  109. rushdog said on November 12th, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Well that’s good to know because, to be quite frank, yesterday you sounded like you were threatening to switch allegiance. Congrats on the series.

    Reply
  110. Togi said on November 12th, 2010 at 7:38 pm

    DON’T GIVE HER IDEAS, RD!!! I’d die of cardiac arrest of Keane switched over to the Angie Train! LOL@rushdog:

    Reply
  111. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    @Togi:

    Thanks Alaskan Cat on Head Lady friend x

    Reply
  112. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    @rushdog:

    Yeah, not quite that bad yet – just want to make sure they are both held equally accountable – and they will be! And thanx for the congrats! x

    Reply
  113. water hold the lemon please said on November 12th, 2010 at 8:18 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Yup, that’s the true Keane talking, none of you are really her friend, never where. Took you all enough to figure it out……Let’s see if Keane deletes my post again.

    Reply
  114. Constant Gardener said on November 12th, 2010 at 8:22 pm

    I can’t recommend pissing Keane off. She will go all over the interwebs spreading her lies and self loathing.

    Reply
  115. Tamara said on November 12th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    @Togi:
    Right – there ya go. Enough said.

    Reply
  116. alif said on November 13th, 2010 at 2:16 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    I’ll save this. Unfortunately, my computer is having sound problems. Until it’s fixed, I’ll have to use a public one. Sounds interesting, thanks!

    Reply
  117. alif said on November 13th, 2010 at 2:26 am

    @Togi:
    Could very well be. But, I’m totally at sea with this one. A Brangelinagate like Watergate was for Nixon.
    Wonder who will discover the break in?
    I’m missing something in the clue. Thanks!

    Reply
  118. yos said on November 13th, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    Long time lurker, first time poster.

    Just came on to deliver a PSA. Keane, having read your posts on here for the past year or so, I feel you would benefit greatly from psychotherapy. It would give you a better understanding of yourself and help you to have better relationships. I strongly urge you to consider it, and find a good therapist you can trust. I did it myself, and it’s been a great help to me. It’s nothing to be ashamed of. Please consider it.

    Reply
  119. I'm on the bidet said on November 13th, 2010 at 8:11 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Congrats on the commission Keane! I had a look at the Channel 4 website, and I think I already found the listing:

    “Kookin’ with Keane”. Reality, cooking. Join host Keane and her guests from the world of Hip-Hop as they prepare dinner dishes and desserts. In tonight’s episode, rapper Lil’ John visits the kitchen, and Keane becomes concerned both about the legality of his “Rastafarian Pot Pie” and the edibility of his “Probably Potatoes” dish he claims to have found under the back seat of his rental car.

    Just kidding of course . . . let us know when it comes on, thought I don’t even get BBC 4. Maybe you could scan in your storyboards and put them online?

    -IOTB

    Reply
  120. weight said on November 15th, 2010 at 9:05 am

    i like

    Reply
  121. Up the Coast said on November 15th, 2010 at 6:39 pm

    Is the coast clear? ;)

    Reply
  122. Keane Dangerous Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 15th, 2010 at 6:45 pm

    @Keane Dangerous Cyber Queen Supreme:

    And Viv’s possible issues – is that about James too? Is that why they won’t talk about it, in case people put two and two together? And is that why she bought a big piece of land in france and had her kids there – so they got dual passports and can live there too? Just a hot, cold or warm will do.

    Reply
  123. Togi said on November 15th, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    Haaa haaa. I’ve been wondering the same thing! I have my hard hat and flack jacket on, just in case.@Up the Coast:

    Reply
  124. Keane Dangerous Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 15th, 2010 at 8:09 pm

    @Up the Coast:

    Not yet babe :-)

    Reply
  125. Guillermina Stenberg said on November 16th, 2010 at 9:20 am

    @Admin: What’s the easiest way of contacting you if I have a question regarding adverstising on your website? It seems like you have a considerable amount of visitors. I am interested in either a 125×125 box or a simple text link depending on price. Thanks.

    Reply
  126. Tamara said on November 16th, 2010 at 11:32 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    You know I find that sentiment really rich considering that the past two years have been spent on this very blog discussing her drug use, bestiality, incest, rape, illegal adoptions, man stealing, blood wearing, press manipulation, children pimping, etcetera, but Hey! Mental issues are off limits??? How do you justify that?

    Reply
  127. wtf said on November 16th, 2010 at 11:43 am

    @Tamara:
    @tam maybe it hits too close to home ;)

    Reply
  128. Tamara said on November 16th, 2010 at 11:52 am

    @wtf:
    IDK about that but I DO know that “batshit crazy” has been mentioned many times here so I’m getting a bit tired of the preaching from the Choir as it were. Funny little thing about archives – its easy enough to go back and read past discussions.

    Reply
  129. Keane Dangerous Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 16th, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    @Tamara:

    Hi Tam, it’s about lay people making medical diagnoses of people they have never met (double problem) and thereby opening themselves up to the possibility of being sued. It’s one thing commenting on a blog (you’re vulnerable to being sued of course, but it’s less likely), it’s another to create your own and start posting stories to that effect. Not one but two in a matter of days in fact, to really hammer the point home. I was just warning people to be careful, principally Kate. If you don’t want to heed that warning it’s entirely up to you, and it really is no concern of mine. I’m not going to waste my time trying to protect people who do not want my protection and I honestly really have too much to worry about in my own life to concern myself with it. Go back into the archives and look up everything I’ve said if it matters to you that much Tam and it makes you feel like you’ve proved a point or something, but I’m not going to engage in a conversation about it because I don’t care about winning this argument. I was warning you all about something and saying what you are saying is dangerous and nothing more. Nothing else to say on the matter and nowhere else to go with it. Not preaching to anyone or hoping to convert anyone, just making my point which I am entitled to make. And that really is it. Good luck with your life, good luck with the blog, take care and all the best, K.

    Reply
  130. Keane Dangerous Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 16th, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    @wtf:

    Hi wtf – I’m fortunate enough to have never suffered from a mental illness in my life but if I had I would not be ashamed to admit it as plenty of people I know I have suffered from them, and there is no shame in it, just as there is no shame in admitting you have suffered from a physical illness. Keep trying to score the petty points though, it’s definitely working for you!

    Reply
  131. mooki said on November 16th, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    FYI, I’ve posted a lot of Ted C’s Blind Vice answers in the disussion forum

    btw, I’m hearing that the Travolta’s surrogate is going to give birth any day now. I’d kill to get my hands on Kelly Preston’s fake pregnancy belly….

    Reply
  132. water hold the lemon please said on November 16th, 2010 at 8:56 pm

    @Tamara:
    Don’t give her any ideas. She’ll probably go and delete them just like she deletes posts that she doesn’t like. You will never win an argument with Keane. Even if she knows that you are right she’ll never admit it because she believes she is smarter than anyone else on this blog. To actually concede, say I’m sorry or ya know you have a point Tamara (or Patty Anne, Kate ect) is something she is incapable of saying. She reminds me of a famous actress with 6 children and a raggedy ass boyfriend……..

    Reply
  133. mooki said on November 16th, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    @mooki:

    and shove it in their faces for an autograph! lmfao!

    Reply
  134. siska said on November 16th, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    All this sighting of PDA and family outing of brangelina plus her directing debut..its a lead up to both of their movie pr blitz..specially The Tourist..remember AJ doing her pr slighty more skillful than any other HW player..
    Thats way in AM bio about her..there is a mention about AJ ambition to be with JD..its to create a buzz about this movie..she will do everything to pr her movie..even her kids,,she never mind to be dig her past..she create an image of reformer bad girl..and people eat it!!!
    Remember JD close with BP..JD worked in one of BP produce movie.

    AJ always get what she want..

    Reply
  135. siska said on November 16th, 2010 at 10:08 pm

    Other players usually use the break up of relation (fake or real),new partner or new baby or occassional food in the mouth disease for Pr..but AJ tactic more prof…she agree of her bio even its show her dark past,she mention strange fact about her kids,love declaration to BP,pretend to had some kinda attraction with JD..months before the movie release,..she even took up directorial debut..eventhough there was not any mention before (I remember JA actually being interview before about her desire to directing again..and suddenly out of no where ,,AJ on the location for her directing job..)..Its show how rush it..when the local government never got the copy of the scenario…or which she actually write her own script?..its the same with her adoption..the process always like a lighting strike..because its used for deflection of the real stuff.or .pr for her agenda

    Reply
  136. siska said on November 16th, 2010 at 10:10 pm

    she is one powerful woman..she made men obey her!! Her movie being produced by BP partner in Departed..Graham..the same people who produce the Tourist!..GK company

    Reply
  137. Togi said on November 16th, 2010 at 11:02 pm

    You know, Siska … you mention something I noticed as well. I have wondered WHY, after Jen was talking about directing, AJ just suddenly, out of the blue, decided SHE wanted to direct. Actually, I found it kind of funny. It’s hard for me to believe everything is orchestrated, though. Only because I, personally, would never be able to keep track of it. I can’t imagine someone trying to keep track of lies like that. LOL@siska:

    Reply
  138. alif said on November 17th, 2010 at 3:47 am

    @Togi:
    I believe that AJ is capable of manipulating to the max! I also believe that she knows we live in a society with a short attention span. Posts from just a year ago, for example, are forgotten, already. She knows that. That’s what the manipulation does for everyone who practices it. She’s not the only one who has learned to do it. Earlier, the cult of Scientology did it for their owned stars.
    Way before that, it was done by show biz players.
    And now, we see it being done everywhere!
    Check out the reports of the results of “Dancing with the Stars”; then see the comments. Only on this one the anti-Bristol comments are overwhelmingly in the majority, despite the manipulative attempts of the teabaggers.
    That’s just one example. One could write a book. (Not me, I’m not talented or ambitious enough.)

    OT. A happier report. The American media has been in a tizzy over the engagement of Prince William and Kate Middleton. The reporters seem delighted. Some are comparing her to Princess Di. But to some of us, there will always be only one Princess Di.
    I, for one, am looking forward to the wedding.

    Reply
  139. Togi said on November 17th, 2010 at 5:06 am

    Hey Alif. I COMPLETELY agree that there are people capable of manipulating others like that. I just can’t imagine what goes on in the head of someone who does it! Do they EVER get to live in the here and now?

    Re Prince William … it was very, very nice to hear he and his long-time lady love are officially engaged. She’s such a pretty young lady and has been very classy all along. She won’t be Princess Di … she will be Princess Kate. It will be really interesting to see how this new generation of royals progresses. @alif:

    Reply
  140. wtf said on November 17th, 2010 at 7:46 am

    @Togi:
    i don’t think it was out of the blue. Her father was always interested in writing scripts and directing. not a huge leap for her to be as well.

    Reply
  141. Tamara said on November 17th, 2010 at 8:18 am

    @Togi:
    Yea, I think this marriage will be completely different than Diana and Charles. I mean, Kate has been with William for 8 years she surely knows what she’s getting into and its obviously a love match. Im happy for her, there will be babies shortly thereafter I would imagine – and I don’t think the ring is cursed I think it’s a lovely gesture.

    Reply
  142. Tamara said on November 17th, 2010 at 8:20 am

    IAN – it looks like we need a new post here soon! Hope everything is alright with you and that you will be back with us soon!! This one has run its course I think lol xoxoxo

    Reply
  143. Iona said on November 17th, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    How about more clues? Never having an answer to any of these Sugar entries is frustrating. A crumb here or there would probably attract more to your site.

    Reply
  144. siska said on November 18th, 2010 at 6:55 am

    @Togi:
    They seem to use their triangle stuff to enhance all the party profile..i am JA fans..but I admit sometime JA use or drop their name too..maybe this triangle thing is being market by their publicity ..unfortunately..JA seem always get the bad end of the deal..(she is being labelled the loser,eventhought she is the one who file for divorce)..I think JA already tried to cut herself from the triangle recently a bit more by dating more bad boys type..but its not working..people still tide her with them.
    I think she is the only one who constantly being tide to her ex eventhough the divorce already 5 years ago, this is maybe because she is still single.
    I do not think she will ever married again.Her parent and her own experience might scare her to life.
    About the AJ things..she never ever mention about her desire to directing as far as I remember..she only mention about going to retire and suddenly work back to back..(directing is much bigger responsibility and time consuming than acting..)Why you wanted to have big family if you spend most of time working?..I knew a woman still want to work eventhough they had kids..but to have 4 kids under 5 years old and deliberately work as a script writer and director after just finish her Tourist movie..seem a bit selfish..she can wait till the kids bit bigger..like her interview wanted to retire soon..that seem to contradict.
    I understand her fans like wtf want to justify it..but sometime the fact is the fact!!

    Reply
  145. siska said on November 18th, 2010 at 7:13 am

    you should spend more time to your kids when they are small..not when they are adult..its seem silly..
    btw..Ian could you tell me whats going on actually between JA,JM and GB?.
    its being known GB and JM once being reported had dinner with Jessica Simpson around the time JS want to promote her TV segment,after that “”the Sexual Napalm”" enhanced JS profile.
    JA being rumoured broke up with JM and hooking up with GB when they want to promote the Bounty..but recently on november,JM celebrate GB birthday in NYC at the same time JA spotted in NYC for shooting and 24 hours play.
    GB and JM also being spotted weeks before at the premire of Hilary Swank movie that including Sam Rockwell (JA co star in 24 hours play) and Juliete Lewis (Bp ex and JA costar in the Switch ).
    There also news about JM doing a concert in Atlanta at the same time JA shooting wonderlust.
    I think HW full of cloak and dagger..we never knew the real truth.
    ian could you dig..which of this man (GB or JM) that actually dating JA? or they just a cover for her real relation?
    I also think JA and BP relation already being repaired long time ago..and more strong now because BP being reported in the same concert with C.cox and he was in Mastermind movie that produced by BenS..which JA closed friend (he being pictured on c.cox bbq and hug JA).
    About Dear John song in TAylor S, i think its only to promote her cd..the same with her “relation”with Jack,Taylor L,etc..she loves being in beard situation.

    Reply
  146. siska said on November 18th, 2010 at 7:17 am

    @wtf:
    ..she never mention any desire to directing or writing a script, she just recently forgive her dad..and he never actually directing movie as far as i understand…so there is still odd situation here..

    Reply
  147. siska said on November 18th, 2010 at 7:19 am

    megamind forgive me..maybe means that with megamind movie,its show JA friends already forgive BP?

    Reply
  148. siska said on November 18th, 2010 at 7:31 am

    @alif:
    I agree..people seem to forgive the famous and pretty people more easily…specially if they are so captivating with her beauty and charming OUTSIDE persona. They overlook the facts with their devotion.
    specially if the fact being deflect with others thing..which AJ is the master of it…Remember..even Clooney admit AJ is one smart cookies..she use humanatarian stuff to the max..and after she saw the decline interest of it ..she use her kids…just read all her recent interviews..she mention about her kids odd behaviours soo often. and the picture of Shiloh with too well dress man style clothing,…she never shy to use any mean necesarry..thats way she is one of the most fascinating people in the world..she will never want the public bore of her.She love the attention..and the world wants her.

    Reply
  149. siska said on November 18th, 2010 at 7:34 am

    @siska:
    I think i read forgive..but actually forget me..maybe means..AJ didnt went to the premire because of the JA friends circle there (forget me).

    Reply
  150. joanne said on November 18th, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    @siska:
    Maybe JM and GB dating.

    Reply
  151. alif said on November 18th, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    @siska:
    In my opinion, JA is hard to figure. But you remember in the early times after the divorce, she kept to the high ground. Very classy!
    Also, while the loonies were after JA on, seemingly, every blog site, she refused to dignify them by playing their game. And the silence was deafening from the Brangelina camp regarding all the unjustified acts of blaming the victim.
    The only comments I recall from JA, are that BP is “missing a sensitivity chip”. This is absolutely spot on, when one observes his behavior since the split! Also, Jennifer saying that AJ is “not cool”.
    Meanwhile, the media, which AJ owns, continues to be “under her thumb”.
    She may not “bore” some of the public; but rest assured, she is not that exciting an actress and celebrity to some of us; nor is she gifted with extraordinary acting abilities. But others will follow her wherever she will lead them, because they happen to think she is!

    I’m interested in whether all three members of the triangle have quit using drugs. That would be harder to investigate, I’m thinkin’.

    Reply
  152. alif said on November 18th, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    To add to the above: JA seems to have the worst taste in men, according to so many posts I’ve seen.
    But there hasn’t been any solid evidence that implies she is through with men. Anti-Jennifer comments keep harping on her “not letting go of BP”. They don’t even sound convincing; but there it is.
    Lately, I’ve been going to only a few gossip sites, (because it’s all about the same news) these days. I’m tired of TMZ’s obssession with Mel/Oksana. But it’s the place I look for the latest breaking news.
    D-Listed is too “sewer-like” in its self-serving reportage.
    E-online is lacking in so many things.
    And the list goes on and on.
    Siska, that’s my take.

    Reply
  153. alif said on November 18th, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    @siska:
    Huffingtonpost.com is the one that appeals to me, because of the variety of their subjects of discussion.

    Reply
  154. joanne said on November 18th, 2010 at 6:25 pm

    Huffingtonpost butt kisses the JPs, quit reading them awhile ago. They used to be ok but have been sliding downhill.

    Reply
  155. siska said on November 28th, 2010 at 10:06 pm

    @alif:
    Happy thanksgiving!! sorry bit late reply
    The only men that she seem to being seen was a bad boy type one.
    I think this is maybe because she want to distance herself with “”Bp leave her for AJ “”image.
    So she and her pr team create this others relations for it. But I think its failed, they still connect her with them . I think its because she is not actually married any of them, and this will be a problem because I believe she will never get married again (she got burnt twice, her dad and BP).
    I think she actually has a proper relation that hiding from public eyes.
    I read most of the blog about JA, but I dont believe them, only to see some pictures and sometime get a giggle for how ridiculous the “news”" is.
    I only basic my opinion from direct quote and the repeat behaviour of the stars.
    The one that I actually admire JA is when she actually do not give a shit about rumour/media potray her for not wanted a kids as a cause of the Bp leave her.
    She can easily adopt a kid (like S.bullock with her black baby..when her hubby infidility and racism stuff cloud her image) to improve her image..but she is not..She will not have a kid for the sake of pr…she only use a mature and willing man participant….not like AJ who bragging about not wanting to get pregnant because too many orphan in the world and suddenly had 3 biological kids either to trap her man or to improve her image…

    Reply
  156. siska said on November 28th, 2010 at 10:13 pm

    @alif:
    about the drugs,,I think they all still used it..but Bp and AJ seem a bit more heavy user..specially AJ..she seem soo skinny ( I read that her drug of choice is the heavy one..she is in the blind item of Ted C,as a fake ala ferocity)..and Bp and JA use weeds.
    I had a copy of her picture in Who (same as People mag in US) last year and her leg as couple of slices..
    Are she still harming herself or something else?
    I really wish she will be wake up and start really think about her priority, she need to be more present to her kids and not use them for pr.
    I also wish Bp and AJ stay together as a loving parent for their kids.
    I dont want BP reunite with JA, she deserve better.

    Reply
  157. siska said on November 28th, 2010 at 10:16 pm

    @joanne:
    Gb definitely straight, because he is in Guy (madonna ex) movies twice?..he is a well known homophobic.

    Reply
  158. alif said on November 29th, 2010 at 12:58 am

    @siska:
    It seems that JA is in a quandary.
    What we wish for her is to grow in every positive way, possible. But is she up to it?
    How can she remove herself from the bloggers’ image of a clinging vine that they imposed on her?
    How can she detach herself from the one “who is missing a sensitivity chip”? So far, she hasn’t used the media to get rid of her pining-for-Brad persona, which isn’t helping her at all. It only makes BP as this desirable male who is so strongly irresistable that it boosts his image as a “sexy” person. A fake, when one considers that they made his imagery in “Troy” a sexy one; when in fact, they used a body double for shots of his thighs. This was reported in the press back then. However, people believe what they see on screen is real. Also reported was the amount of attention to his hair, which was most inappropriate for the time period. So now people are actually buying into this nonsense!
    But, to each his own, as they say. It just seems to me that she has to work on the above because it’s hurting her image.
    I agree that she doesn’t seem to be anywhere near giving marriage another try. But didn’t His Highness repprt several months ago, that JA had found a really serious romance?

    Reply
  159. joanne said on November 29th, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    Aniston was burned 3 times since her mother wrote a book about her, you can almost say 4 times since pitt was also her best friend. Why should she jump into a marriage to make the loons less anxious?

    Reply
  160. alif said on November 29th, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    @joanne:
    I don’t see the loonies as anxious. I don’t think they give a fig, to be frank.
    It’s JA’s supporters who should go after the bloggers who continue to foist the big lie upon us; i.e. that Jennifer Aniston is this tragic loser.

    Reply
  161. joanne said on November 29th, 2010 at 5:58 pm

    @alif:
    She really doesn’t need defending, she looks great, works steady, has lots of friends and a great bank account. She had Pitt when he was a hot rising star. The loons need to know that Aniston is not the reason most people are offended by the Jolie Pitts, some are but most know Hollyweird divorces happen all the time. Bloggers need to start calling out all the crap the Jolie Pitts foist on us. Those kids do not look happy and she is not saintly, generous or sexy.

    Reply
  162. alif said on November 30th, 2010 at 1:38 am

    @joanne:
    The only thing we disagree on her need for “defending”.
    We know, or read that posters are hired to “defend” certain stars. It’s pretty apparent that the cult of scientology did just that for TomKat several yrs ago. One noticed that all the posts sounded exactly the same.
    We know that the loonies are everywhere! And bloggers have said the worst things about Jennifer. (Perez Hilton, anyone?) So it incites the anti-Jen factions to constantly attack Jen. With time, it’s hurt her to the extent that she has this image I have described in the post above. And it’s because good people just go along with it. (Edmund Burke’s famous quote applies her, imo!)
    Yes, she does need defending. Someone has to; otherwise, they will succeed. So at least we can temper some of the damaging blogs.
    I, for one, defend her because of the lies and manipulation that has gone on for five years.

    Reply
  163. joanne said on November 30th, 2010 at 8:07 am

    @alif:
    I was reading the posts on TMZ and the Aniston defense was starting to sound loonish, that could ruin her just like the loons ruined holie. When all this started I was banned from a lot of blogs I used to post on and was never allowed to post on just jared, movietone was also a big offender back then, I also got banned from TMZ and popeater sometimes let me post. People were saying much worse things than i was so i don’t think it was what I was saying. Aniston has karma on her side and looking at the holie stupitts karma is winning. Pitt went from rising star to shell shocked manny. the holey one is losing her looks rapidly and thats all she had. Perez is a pig but he has someone behind him pushing him, sad. Sticks and stones don’t hurt but losing your looks in Hollyweird does.

    Reply
  164. joanne said on November 30th, 2010 at 8:10 am

    @joanne:
    I am wrong, sticks and stones do hurt….but a name is just a name. Aniston has staying power.

    Reply
  165. siska said on November 30th, 2010 at 10:05 am

    @joanne:
    I am with you on defending JA..and maybe thats the same reason the AJ supporter said..but the different is, I am not into bullying type behaviour that some of the blogger or so called AJ fans did..and sometime JA fans did too.
    I think we all realise that the public persona and the real people its sometime soo different, thats way when I look at how JA surround herself with loyal long time friends, I can tell that she is a genuine person. she might not show it on her interview, she sometime seem a bit guarded and serious. But her circle of friends and people who works with her say only good things..she even can forgive BP and still maintain friendship with his family specially his mum.
    I think the main reason she can forgive BP,maybe because of his mum, she seem soo close to jane than to her own mum( who always make her feel down, thats way she having therapy, she keep making jen felt an ugly duckling).
    I lost respect on Bp when he poses that W mag and keep quite for soo long about rumour that Jen didnt want kid…when the reality she is miscarriage..(like ian said) and keep lying about his infidility..
    Even JM seem bit better than BP..at least he try to defend JA on several occassion, but some media still attact him for it.
    JM maybe sound like a deuche but at least he admit it.Not hiding like BP pretend to be the innocent part, AJ being branded as a W ,but it is BP who is married,he should resist to hurt his wife.
    I really hope Bp learn his lesson and make his relation with AJ last longer for the sake of the kids

    Reply
  166. siska said on November 30th, 2010 at 10:21 am

    @alif:
    I think the blogger and tabloid love to painted her as a poor jen..she try to avoid it..by being open on her interview, which her best friend did it. But common public perception already built basic on rubbish from the internet or tabloid, eventhough people who actually knew her tol different Jen.
    She just want to have fun, maybe because she never actually bragging about dumping the man (she try to keep the man pride)..thats way people keep thinking she is always get dump.
    But I think most of the time she actually doing the dumping, even BP she was the one who initiate the divorce.
    AFter break up with her Vince V,JM look like a mess..remember on Golden Globe?..Jen and GB?..GB seem glue himself to her..same when in the Haiti Telethon..its GB who keep getting to JA table.
    She has soo much class..thats way she didnt brag..
    The only reason she can be stay away from Brangelina is when she actually getting married again. thats a slim change.
    The funny thing when a man choose to be single like clooney ,he is cool but when a woman choose to stay single thay are desperate.
    Its sooo old fashion..man and woman is so similar now..they can be happy single.
    I really not that into Brangelina as much..they seem like old news..they keep using their pda (its ok) but they also using their kids..which child want to spend his birthday in the yacth without any of his friend, only the sibling,its a stage one to promote their movie and defending AJ interview that snub Pax.
    Thats way maddox not so happy, he actually cries. What a happy occasion!!!
    The pattern of AJ pr campaign is sooo predictable, but she is use the directing thing as a new pr vehicle..very smart.
    Btw why jen wanted a man who cheated on you before and gutless and has 6 kids from the woman he cheated with as a ideal partner ??
    She is NOT stupid..she is more bankable single and happier…

    Reply
  167. joanne said on November 30th, 2010 at 10:28 am

    @siska:
    The W shoot is when I was no longer a Pitt fan. The loons finished the job. Her fans did more damage than they think with all that gushing over a woman who posed naked with a horse and tongued her brother after winning a oscar where she played herself. The UN and media kept glorifing this trash. I am so glad my daughter thinks this woman is a joke. As a unwed mother I told my daughter not to be like me and reach for the sky then the media and UN shove this down our throats as an example of someone to look up too. I don’t watch tv anymore, all the media wants to push at us is racism and greed, after 54 years I am tired of it and want better for my kids and grandkids. Thr Jolie Pitts need to dump their egos and make it right for these kids.

    Reply
  168. siska said on November 30th, 2010 at 10:31 am

    @joanne:
    abou perez and other anti jen blogger..its because jen actually sue perez for publishing her naked picture from the break up movie..thats way he is being mean to her.
    and for others,,either someone pay them to be mean to JA (maybe someone with no pr company) or because she help to pass the law to prevent paparazy invade their privacy., and she is an target easy to said bad thing it, because she didnt care as much ,she forget more easily..not like AJ whos till holding a grunch over Ryan Seacrest comment 3 years ago..she keep snub him.
    Remember when Eva L wore that ” I’ll have your baby Brad”"..she forgave her,same when Gweneth said that “that TV girl”"..

    Reply
  169. siska said on November 30th, 2010 at 10:33 am

    @alif:
    I wish ian can show some picture of her real bf

    Reply
  170. joanne said on November 30th, 2010 at 11:08 am

    @siska:
    She sued perez? Good for her. She wasn’t a mediaho before the triangle so I think they brought her in because the J/Ps are to freakish and predictable without her.

    Reply
  171. alif said on November 30th, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    I am still puzzled over Angelina Jolie getting top billing over Johnny Depp, in “The Tourist”. So puzzled because in 2009, Johnny Depp was ranked second (behind Sandra Bullock) in the annual year-end boxoffice
    top stars. AJ wasn’t in Top 10, if I recall, correctly. Brad was!
    Her PR staff worked around the clock, it seems, to ensure the success of her last movie. And that’s where the hired posters/bloggers poured in, to spin the threads.
    And they’re still in there “defending” her.
    Sarah Palin replies immediately to anti-Sarah/Bristol/Palins’ news spots. She is reported to have manipulated “Dancing With The Stars”, so her daughter was in there despite the worse reviews of any contestant.
    If you’re in line at the market, you can glimpse thru the latest NE, and see some of what Sarah Palin has done.
    Perhaps, Jennifer Aniston will make it thru the attacks from all over the internet. And perhaps the rags will not perpetuate her loser image. And perhaps, perhaps, perhaps.
    Kudos to JE for maintaining her “taking the high road” stance. But I think she needs people like us to reply to her attackers. For myself, I cannot go to some of those sites, as formerly. Other more adventurous readers will carry the slack, I’m hopin’.
    With that said, I have no more comments on the topic.

    Reply
  172. siska said on December 4th, 2010 at 7:45 am

    @alif:
    I think about the movie..it is AJ movie..they give the script to her and because the first choice of leading man Sam W reject it..she ask BP connection to persuade JD for the role..but JD seem purposely fatting himself to make AJ look good maybe..or because the script wanted an ordinary man so he dress down..
    Thats way the Andrew M bio mention about JD..to make the movie getting buzz for the so called Sexual tension..but I honestly think AJ sexual orientation mostly toward woman..and their brand is so strong they will continue to be together until the due time…which will took us by suprise.
    I will try to continue defend JA by telling the fact not fiction..and by not spreading unnessary hatred toward the brangelina things.just simple fact.
    Ok enjoy and will continue again in other topic

    Reply
  173. siska said on December 4th, 2010 at 7:51 am

    @joanne:
    JA play the media games like everyone else in HW..to promote her works..she sometime play this bermuda triangle games too,,but in the down side…she mostly say it when people ask her..NOt voluntary…I hope..
    but she seem more private than AJ regarding her real lives..compare to AJ who like to talk and show about her family and her love to BP. very frequently//.its too much seem too stage.
    But the brangelina pr games is wayyy over anyone else standard..they are the expert!!!..thats way their brand is very strong globally,..thats way their movies earns a lot..basic mostly on their names.

    Reply
  174. Iona said on December 8th, 2010 at 10:55 pm

    Everybody’s lost interest in figuring this out, so for my own amusement I’m wondering if “bird bowl for sale” is Depp’s yacht Vajoliroja (first 2 ltrs his bird’s name)? It’s been advertised “for rent” for $130K/wk over the last year.

    Reply
  175. alif said on December 9th, 2010 at 1:16 am

    @siska:
    I do, as well. He could be respecting her privacy, if the story is true.
    I also agree that the triangle is so old, Brangelina got what they wanted from the media.

    Reply
  176. siska said on December 11th, 2010 at 11:41 am

    @alif:
    But unfortunately this triangle thing still sell!!! its juicy like a real life soap opera of rich and famous.

    Reply
  177. siska said on December 11th, 2010 at 11:44 am

    are any body saw the tourist? how is the honest review without bias of hatred toward AJ..just pure about the movie experience?

    IN sydney will be shown on 26 dec

    Reply
  178. siska said on December 11th, 2010 at 7:35 pm

    the review on rotten tomatoes seem bad..but the critic and the box office result usually rarely match..People specially their fans will still love this movies just to see them.I watch Love Happens eventhough not so great basicly to support JA movies..I only went to cinema for her movies and my son’s.
    I saw Jen with a prince pictures ..she looks so great..she rarely did appereance on fuction without a movies attached,I think maybe because she loves the wines?..i bet she having good times..specially her friends Sacha Cohan was there too.

    Reply
  179. alif said on December 13th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Sorry about the late reply. A buddy fixed the sound problem and I turned on the video. It was infectious, imo. Good clean fun!

    Reply
  180. Iona said on December 13th, 2010 at 11:37 pm

    Saw The Tourist and liked it a lot. Not a great movie by any means (”light” is the perfect description), but I feel the critics were unreasonably harsh – something must have pissed them off at the critics screening, I guess. A lot of it is humorous (Depp was very good) with some spy stuff thrown in. Pace is a tad slow when it focuses on the romance/relationship parts; there is some action/violence but not huge fireball type of stuff. I’ve never been a fan of AJ at all, but liked her in Tomb Raider, Salt & Changeling. Here, she sort of plays a mannequin and the way she struts around when moving is model catwalk-like – i.e, ridiculous; don’t know what she was thinking. She has some good parts. The ballroom scene is a good one. Paul Bettany, Rufus Sewell, Timothy Dalton and the rest of the cast are good.

    Reply
  181. siska said on December 14th, 2010 at 8:46 am

    @Iona:
    I agree about the critic..they sometime its to up their axx..they should review movie as entertainment NOT just as an art things..I remember how harsh they are on sex on the city 2 and the switch..when actually the movie quite enjoyable,,its not an academy standard but its a good entertainment value when the viewer felt good after watched it. and some movies that they highly praise. (ex:space odissey 2000).its so confusing..make us headache.

    Thanks for the fair review..I had to skip it..I may watch it on Dvd, cause the only money I will spend in cinema always for JA movies or kids one.
    Its funny how they made AJ so over the top as a lady..when the original movie..Sophie M act as a lady but more classy and normal.
    I think AJ better as a kick ass hero/villain or mental disturbed character.
    Her fans bagged on JA the Bounty Hunter opening number (around 25M)., and now AJ did more worst only 17 M…eventhough AJ opening in holiday high season compare to JA on march slower season…and JA movies cost less..wonder what the haters will say now!!!

    Reply
  182. penis enlargement said on April 10th, 2011 at 10:23 pm

    Thanks alot for the info, helpful indeed. If I may, would I be able to use a quote or two on my website? vimax penis enlargement pills XR2011LAIN_AING

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

November 2010
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Meta