IUC Blind Item: What Famous Star Offered Her Unauthorized Biographer Sex in Exchange for A Favorable Book?

Posted on July 23rd, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Exclusive

sexforhireThis just in – can you guess who????

  • 54 Comments
  • Tags:
  1. ladybert62 said on July 23rd, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    Was the offer accepted? :D

    Reply
  2. Ange said on July 23rd, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    Hmmmm… this is most riveting… I know!
    It was that damn Angelina again, apparently. These so-called blind items are bollocks. It’s probably made up off the top of someone’s head – Guess who did this? Guess who did that?
    How fun to speculate. Just tell us already.

    Reply
  3. Kate said on July 23rd, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    Since he told you I am guessing he told her no. At first glance it does not appear that she is painted as a Saint. The very idea of how she has seduced many and used her son and she and Brad together started the adoption process early on is enough to make half of the married women out there hate her. She sounds terribly unbalanced and selfish. Worse yet, she still admits that she is today.

    But then he goes into how she reforms, so who does he throw into the fire in exchange here for this favorable book on her. I would doubt he had sex with her, but did he raise her up at the cost of someone else, like Brad, or Jennifer?

    Someone had to pay the price for the truth, they always do. Or did he just sell out thinking more people would buy the book if it were favorable to her, get better reviews by the media? If so, he will have again, written one that people will not want to read.

    I hope not. He seems like a decent guy, but there are so many rumors she had her hand in this. Maybe it was on him.

    Reply
  4. dani said on July 23rd, 2010 at 8:16 pm

    yawn

    Reply
  5. babyjane said on July 24th, 2010 at 12:10 am

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

    Reply
  6. I'm on the bidet said on July 24th, 2010 at 2:16 am

    Nancy Reagan and Kitty Kelley?

    Reply
  7. Tamara said on July 24th, 2010 at 7:39 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    hahaha You are in the wrong line of work Missy – we should see you doing stand up somewhere! hahaha

    Reply
  8. Vittoria said on July 24th, 2010 at 11:12 am

    @Kate:
    OMG! How could AM turn down such a great offer? hahahahaha He probably wanted to, but was afraid he would snap her like a twig.

    Reply
  9. Lily said on July 24th, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    LOL – that was good!

    Reply
  10. emerson said on July 24th, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    IYuck just yuck….I would be afraid of the face falling off or distorting worse or just yuck…now I have a vision of aj and am doing the deed…not goooooooddd at alllll. Time to decompresssss

    Reply
  11. mooki said on July 24th, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    Perez hints that V. Hudgens is into bondage/S&M
    http://perezhilton.com/2010-07-24-whatsherface-gets-a-sucker-punch

    Reply
  12. I'm on the bidet said on July 24th, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    @mooki:
    Another Tom Cruise mystery for you mooki – how did he get so tall?
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/22/tom-cruise-cameron-diaz-i_n_656203.html

    Reply
  13. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 24th, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    Ian I always figured that was you to be honest – or at least that’s what some of SR’s posts seemed to suggest. But I think in this instance I will go for the obvious answer and say both of you. For the sake of your physical health though I am hoping you both declined! Honestly though does she really think money and sex can buy anyone and keep all her shit quiet. No chance Angelina, no chance. You think you’ve chopped off one head and another just grows in it’s place. Life’s a bitch isn’t it? CUE JAMES:

    Reply
  14. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 24th, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    So Ian – seeing as I was immediately blocked from Mel’s site for reasons only known to herself – can I ask you what you know about this Melvin character and her blog Melvin Knows which has suddenly sprung up? She claims to have skype messages from Brad and Jen – more than one conversation too. She also claims to have interviews with the staff members who worked in the villa Brad and Jen were staying in when they split – a scoop which would have earnt her and/or the publication she was working for at the time one serious amount of de niro had it been published. She claims she did not go to press with it at the time because there were a “lot of details and she could not pull them all together at the time”- which as any journo who has fought over a story with half the journalists in the country would know is total and utter baloney. You get the scoop, you publish it, unless there are legal reasons why you cannot do so. But if there were those issues then there also would be now which is why I am absolutely certain the woman is lying. She also somehow managed to get these private communications between Brad and Jen with no legal interference from the major fan of the cease and desist notice Bradley Pitt himself. Which leads me to only one conclusion: Brad has asked this woman to set up a site to release info which whitewashes his role in the saga ahead of the Morton book and make it look like him and Jen are getting back together, whether they are or not. They are trying to claim that the reason he left Jen was because Angelina was prepared to do a certain sex act that Jen would not do and that she said if she was with him she would do it 5 times a day or some such nonsense, thus making her look like a whore and him look like a man who just couldn’t help thinking with his little head (hey we can all understand that right guys? uh no, actually wrong) rather than a man who was and is fully culpable for his actions and is as much to blame for the whole sorry affair as Angelina is. Brad must think he is superhuman if he thinks he is going to get out of this mess without taking any blame. He is as bad as she is and has gone along with the whole dreadful story and exploited those kids and dragged his ex-wife’s reputation through the dirt and lied and lied until he was blue in the face about it all as much as she has IMO, and he is still doing it now. Why? To protect his sorry-ass, bubble-gum, all-American pin-up movie career that’s why, and to me that is more shallow, and more heinous than Miss more than a few screws loose, I must be the most amazing person in the world because I didn’t feel loved as a child, Angelina Jolie IMO. Sorry Brad if you think you’re going to get away with all this scott free you have another thing coming. You are just as culpable for it all as she is and you will take it on the chin just as she must. You cannot make people believe what you want them to believe just because you have money. Time to wake up and smell the coffee.

    Reply
  15. anoni said on July 24th, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    what if (and I mean, what if) brad and jens marriage was over in 2002-03 (when they separated for almost 9 mos while he filmed Troy) because he found out she aborted his child to pursue a movie career? her machine started rumblings about a miscarriage but quickly stopped (he threatened to spill the beans). he tried to understand her motives, realized she wasn’t ready for motherhood, and was emotionally unstable, therefore no divorce at the time (guess the suicide threats worked). he meets Jolie, sees a woman who can have family and fame, tries one more time to salvage his marriage, then finds birth control pills while on vaca, realizes she’s just using him to advance her career and all the talk about starting a family is BS, leaves on the next flight out and hooks up with a woman who actually wants the same things he does. Shmuck doesn’t realize the ex and her machine are all ready to go with the “pity party” VF interview, doesn’t say anything cause he actually is a good guy who feels sorry for her, and the 5 yr “wronged woman” saga ensues. Jolie is strong enough to withstand the hatred spewed from every “wronged woman” out there so they let it ride, realizing it’s the exes only claim to fame and fortune (barring any real talent or looks). As plausable a scenario as any recorded on this site. What if?

    Reply
  16. Jalyn said on July 24th, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    Ian Halperin!?!

    Reply
  17. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 24th, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    @anoni:

    Yes anoni and my name is Father Christmas. Oh and yeah, a woman not wanting to bear her husband’s children the moment he says he wants them is definitely grounds both for a divorce and the public rubbing of his relationship with his new bitch in her face for the ensuing 5 years obvs. Brad had every justification for doing what he did, it is all that evil Jen character’s fault. Just as long as it’s never the man’s fault huh – men just think with their little head and simply can’t help being arseholes right? We’ll just let them off because they’re just dumb old men and don’t know any better won’t we? That evil Angelina or that evil Jen (depending on which side of the argument you stand) are just plain witches and one or both of them must be drowned on the ducking stool right? Let’s make sure that man keeps bobbing up smelling of roses though. In your dreams anonibrad, in your dreams.

    Reply
  18. Kateiuc said on July 24th, 2010 at 8:06 pm

    @anoni:
    It is too late for what if’s , the truth has already been established by several authors at this point.

    Reply
  19. dani said on July 25th, 2010 at 12:12 pm

    @anoni:

    When I was unemployed I went downtown and watched the filming of Wanted and since I had worked in video/photography in one of my jobs, struck up conversations with the paps over the days I was there. I would say they agree with you about Jen. She isn’t the sweetheart she portrays.

    Reply
  20. dani said on July 25th, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    @Kateiuc:
    Maybe the truth about Angie, but not the truth about Jen.

    Reply
  21. .... said on July 25th, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    @dani:

    brangeloonie get a life and have you seen the article about jolie in russia, she is a b@tch

    Staff of the Ritz Carlton hotel in Moscow is saying Jolie is one angry cat woman. Everybody is afraid to do something that will make Jolie even more angry. They said that looks like the only thing they’re still allowed to do is moving. If they do something she doesn’t like they will be fired next minute, like that poor man who tried to take her pic. She terrorizes Ritz Carlton in Moscow. Oh, and her children’s travel suitcases are made of white leather. And Jolie ordered some super special menu for her children, it is so special that personnel of this very luxury and very rich hotel have difficulties to find ingredients for it. It’s just a brief summary of this article.

    Reply
  22. dani said on July 25th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    @….:
    Well, I thought we were discussing Jen and not Angie. I didn’t disagree with anything anyone said about Angie. I just said that Jen apparently isn’t the sweetheart she is made out to be. And if you talk to the hotel, crew etc. from her Canadian filming last year–they didn’t like Jen whatsoever. Snotty, snobby, stand offiish, mean. Two different women and what does discussing Jen and her personality have to do with Angie and hers?
    Also, since you brought Angie up–if you have seen pictures of the kids and their luggage–it is not white. It is pretty much every day stuff.

    Reply
  23. dani said on July 25th, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    @….:

    Gee my first comment disappeared.

    First off I wasn’t discussing Angie. I thought we were commenting on Jen. What does Angie have to do with a Jen discussion?
    Angie may be all those things that you are saying, but I’ve heard similar comments about Jen in Canada when she filmed last year. Snotty. Snobby. Standoffish.

    But since you brought Angie up–have you seen pics of the kids and their luggage? Someone had an airport pic from Italy and the luggage was not white leather. It was normal stuff.

    Also, I googled just now Angie in Moscow and hate to break it to you, but I don’t think the kids are with her. This was a fly in/fly out deal.

    So Angie may be the world’s worst person, but it doesn’t mean Jen is the world’s sweetest either.

    Reply
  24. Tinkuy said on July 25th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Did you violate the TOS at MelvinKnows?

    Reply
  25. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 25th, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    No sweetheart, anyone who says: you can only be getting this info from either Brad or Jen is immediately blocked – wonder why that can be?

    Reply
  26. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 25th, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    In this instance though you should be grateful as I am doing your sister a favour. I’m not going to let Brad put all the blame on her and get away with it as if his shit doesn’t stink. She is the devil but he got into bed with her and he can’t get away from that fact. And he won’t.

    Reply
  27. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 25th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    @dani:

    Thing is though dani what Jen is or isn’t like is completely irrelevant to all this, and it always has been. James Haven and friends (Geyer, Trevor etc) have always tried to make it about her to deflect from the reality of their sister/client. Problem is it just doesn’t wash any more because their association with each other was such a long time ago. It’s Angelina and Brad’s actions in the past 5 years that they are being judged for, and Jen, wisely, bailed on that mess a long old time ago. Brad on the other hand has been directly involved with every one of ho-bag’s misdeeds from day one (or day minus however long they were together before the africa pics) and continues to be so to this day (that shameful Salt premiere appearance for one) – how’s he going to try to tallk himself out of that one I wonder? We shall see.

    Reply
  28. emerson said on July 25th, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    Interesting…..in my profession the Ritz Carlton’s of the World have the most valid reputations out of any of these goons….he who is named Brad disgusts me the most…indeed thinking with his literally little brain…Angie is just pure psycho and always will be and you know what they say “you can’t fight crazy”. They deserve each other for life miserable together forever….disgusting. jen is the only one who has an ounce of class in that sorry bunch. Then to put 6 innocent children in that crazy home…Bradly the ego maniac should be ashamed of the life he is leading. Disgusting. He knew of Angie’s psychosis before “branding” with her and their 24 hour sex marathons…paleeze. Bradley grosses me out the most in this sorry state of affairs with 6 children who will be as messed up as their parents. You want to be gay or a diaper/s&m/bisexual whatever….do it without screwing up innocent children…some with emotional problems already…hello Pax anyone? The one who is not named or boy/girl Shiloh…how pathetic these two people are. Meanwhile Jen is all class and discrete humanitarian. Not in your face like psycho Angelina Jolie Voight with her daddy issues. Mommy issues. Knife issues et al. Disgusting.

    Reply
  29. Hotel Savvy said on July 25th, 2010 at 7:26 pm

    @….:
    I don’t care for either Jen or Angie, but I do know hotels having worked at many over the past 20 years. It is standard operating procedure that when you have a famous guest, the staff is not suppose to be intrusive and take unauthorized pictures. And depending on the hotel, termination can be the result. When JA stays at a major hotel chain like the Ritz, you can bet the same rules are in effect.

    Furthermore, the kids aren’t even with Jolie on this trip–according to one of the Pitt sites they are with him. So if that is true then they can hardly have white leather luggage and special menus.

    Reply
  30. Kate said on July 25th, 2010 at 8:14 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Keane hun we have been calling her a wh*re for a good year now right here, haven’t we? What is the difference in that and what is being said now about her at other sites? Brad is not going to get off completely free regardless because Morton’s book already paints him out as a liar and a cheat. The difference though is he is not diabolical , and does seem to have some sort of feelings for others, compassion and cares that they are hurt, where as she can laugh as her child cries and takes delight in rubbing it in a wifes face that she took her husband and had the children that she wanted.

    Every person deserves equal rights and opportunities, the same civil rights, forgiveness when they make mistakes , a chance to make a new start once they have genuinely redeemed themselves. That is what our justice system is based on. Someone may rape, murder, manslaughter by drunk driving, deal drugs as a teenager, cheat, lie, steal, whatever the case may be, but at some point if they are caught and redeemed, then what? Do we as a society just take them to the top the hill an hang them? Write them off as trash because they made mistakes? If a person genuinely wants to clean their life up, don’t they deserve a second chance? I know you do not believe in vengeance Keane, and yet that is how it is coming across. Before anyone ask why this does not apply to Angelina, it does. IF , if , she had a genuine spirit of honest, a true heart of compassion , if she completely and 100 percent put her childrens lives above hers, and truly truly wanted to be a better person and not just convince others that she is, then absolutely she deserves the same. Dr Drew made a very valid point when he said that he was concerned about Angelina and her possible addictions:

    “I’m concerned with what’s really going on with Angelina Jolie,” he said in July’s issue of Playboy. “I’ve never seen someone remit heroin completely. You’re either still on heroin, Oxycontin or something else. Unless you’re dead. Is she still using something? Is she in recovery. If she’s in recovery, I don’t see any evidence of it, because people in recovery invest themselves in simple, selfless acts of service, not global self-serving acts.”

    So that is my answer as to those who wonder why I don’t extend that olive branch to Angelina. Her self serving and whoring our her children these last few weeks have been very troubling. I simply can never imagine ever doing that to my own, how this will affect them long term. My heart goes out to those little children, and it saddens me to see what they go through. I have a hard time understanding why Brad allows that when he himself hates having a that lens in his face , but we don’t know what she has on him.

    All in all, we have said the same things here and much more than that is being said at the other site, and without ever knowing Ian’s sources. You know yourself that a reporter or anyone connected to a story can never ever reveal their sources or no one would talk to them again. How many days in jail have some sat because they refused to reveal them, and even when it was in connected to our National Security? Touchy subject. I m not sure why that is important. Blind items do not even come close to giving you even 1/10 of that. Nor do Riddles.

    In my opinion, and I know you do not agree, but the more blogs that draw attention to what Angelina is going, the better, they need to stick together, not be against one another. Look at all the ones that support her, they all link each other. Strength in numbers. Ian has given us plenty of stories that we don’t know all the details too, not sure if we know if they are true or not, but I know he is not a liar. He tries his best to get the sources verified, and while there may be times he may have been snookered, I am sure he is not the first and will not be the last.

    I hope we will see more blogs spring up that will question the validity of who the real Angelina Jolie is? We don’t need the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth , no one has that my friend, but the people in this equation. If we can just shine a light on the lies, that is enough. I know there is endless fighting and arguing in some message boards between the various teams withing the teams on this triangle. Some have the energy for that , I don’t. I don’t understand the mentality of division on her . Makes no sense to me. She is a interesting subject in that sense. I can’t think of another star that does that to people, but in the long run, it is maddening, exhausting, and a waste of energy. She gets richer, and people like us just get more frustrated.

    Angelina is never going to be taken down by a blog, you are right about that, it is illegal to even try and do so.She is her own worse enemy and I think if the children were not involved by now this would all be over. Most people just would not care. First is was , aww they are so cute, now it is oh no , poor babies. She is just screwing herself royaly. But, blogs can make a difference. The internet is the fastest way to spread anything, and if there is truth behind it, and it can be backed up, and a picture also, that is gold. So here is to many more blogs springing up over the net that will promise to not lie about Miss Angelina Voight. That is all we can hope for, and that it will be entertaining and friendships will bond, because life is much too serious. :)

    If someone would just be honest about her crappy movies that would be a start LOL jmho of course.

    Ian, hope all is well, and you are enjoying your summer . Possibly you can get your friend to share some exerts with you to post before the 3rd?

    Reply
  31. Carrie said on July 25th, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    Run little girl!http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1297537/Red-hot-Angelina-Jolie-greets-young-fan-kiss-arrives-Russian-premiere-new-spy-movie-Salt.html

    Reply
  32. colour said on July 26th, 2010 at 12:54 am

    @Kate:

    So you don`t have enough energy to participate in the triangle discussion on a forum like FF but have have enough energy to hate and dissect a stranger who happens to be called Jolie? Does that make sense to you Kate? Most sane people just ignore those who they cannot stand unless they are forced to deal with them on the workplace or as a neighbour!

    Reply
  33. Lizzie said on July 26th, 2010 at 4:01 am

    Can somebody fill me in? is James Haven a Pastor & does he have a girlfriend?

    Reply
  34. Lizzie said on July 26th, 2010 at 4:04 am

    also why do some people here think Brad is gay? :)

    Reply
  35. WTF said on July 26th, 2010 at 10:11 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    a lot of people are blocked randomly from that site. Some of my posts go through most don’t (if i happen to disagree or ask questions on where she’s getting her info). Amateur is my guess judging from the way she’s so cozy with the main posters. I have little doubt she’s a Jen fan who’s trying to build interest in a new site by claiming to have insider information about a jen / brad reconciliation (which i highly doubt is credible)

    Reply
  36. vcomtejm said on July 26th, 2010 at 10:21 am

    LJAdau nmykowhdjvlz, [url=http://elyylreyxjhl.com/]elyylreyxjhl[/url], [link=http://gdjyzmulzglr.com/]gdjyzmulzglr[/link], http://leqmutltcdgv.com/

    Reply
  37. lurkeyloo said on July 26th, 2010 at 11:33 am

    I’m truly disturbed at the pictures of AJ going in to kiss that little girl in Russia (pics are on DLISTED.COM). She looks like she is getting ready to French kiss a small child???? WTF???

    Reply
  38. WTF said on July 26th, 2010 at 11:50 am

    oh and just for fun i’m guess Madonna and her brothers book ;)

    Reply
  39. Tamara said on July 26th, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    @WTF:
    LOL – so your guess is that Madonna offered to sleep with her gay brother if he promised not to write the book? That doesn’t even make sense.

    Reply
  40. WTF said on July 26th, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    @Tamara:
    duh that was kinda the point

    Reply
  41. alif said on July 26th, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    What does AJ have on Brad, that he is being held hostage?
    JMO! It could be a photo taken when his guard was down, and he was “high as a kite!” (Diapers come to mind.)
    It could be some info about his hooking up with guys. This was on several sites in the past.
    It might well be how he got his “foot in the door” at the start of his career.
    So how would that be put out there before the naive public? Well, isn’t it a certainty by now, that AJ owns the media? Why, even a site I formerly respected, USA Today, has a blogger extolling Angelina Jolie’s “sweetness”. I think it might still be there, but I’d have to force myself to read such crud!

    Reply
  42. Tamara said on July 26th, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    @WTF:
    LOL Ohhhhh sorry! A bit dense today! hahaha

    Reply
  43. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 26th, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    @Kate:

    Hey kate – sorry am flying off to do another quick turnaround doc tomorrow morning so don’t have time to read your post fully or reply at length, but will just say this. Mel did not say she couldn’t reveal her sources she said she didn’t go to press with the scoop of the interview with the villa staff members at the time “because she couldn’t really pull all the details together at the time”. That is total BS. If she got the interview then she would have gone to press with it unless there were major legal reasons why she could not do this. But if there were those reasons then there still would be now so that is also BS. The interviews also weren’t in any way libellous so there would have been no issue there – only issue would have been breaking confidentiality contracts – which had they done then they still would be now so also no cigar. Journos who get this type of scoop make serious de niro. They make as much in a day as I do in a week for example. No way Mel would have got those interviews and not got paid, no way. She also could not tell me how those skype texts could be linked to Brad and Jen for sure – if she doesn’t have a way then she better watch her back as Mr and Mrs litigous Jolie-Pitt and Jen Aniston will be on to her like a shot. Curiously though they have not been nor can Mel explain how she got those skypes, making them completely invalid at this point. It is not good enough to say “a journalist never reveals it’s sources” – that is BS. There has to be some provenance otherwise it is meaningless.

    If you read the accounts she is giving they are implicitly trying to make Brad look like an innocent party and that it is all Angelina’s fault. That is rubbish he is as much to blame as she is. He wants us to think he left Jen because Ange is a filthy whore who would let him do what he wants to her. That wasn’t the reason, the reason was that he was a vain, shallow, egotisitical moron who was impressed by her nonsense and wanted a piece of that self-glorifying action. He wants us to believe that him and Jen were so friendly during the days he dumped her for the ho that they were still hugging and smiling and acting like a couple. How bloody convenient now he has to admit he was a tit who made a massive mistake. But you know what you can do in this situation you can always blame it on one or other of the women – never fails to keep people on side. Well I’m sorry but not this person. Mel is a liar and you know the moment someone tells me a lie it is over. She lied to me in her very first communication. Also blocking anyone who dare question her sources or post anything vaguely challenging is a bit of a red flag. If she’s got the goods why can’t she defend herself? She can’t because she knows what I said is right and she has eff all to come back at me with. Give Ian his dues he never did that and he always tried to answer his critics and explain himself. I have never said I believe everything Ian has said or that this is some sort of Ian = truth v Mel = lies battle, this is not remotely about Ian. It is about the fact that yet again we are being lied to and are being expected to suck it up. Well sorry mister but you’re going to have to try a bit harder than that, no dice from where I’m standing.

    And Kate you completely misinterpret what I am saying if you believe I am talking about vengeance. I am not talking about that in any sense. I am talking about two people being culpable for their actions and not being applauded for them or allowed to get away with them scott free. If anything it seems to me that some people are on a mission to destroy one woman who they hate and allow others to get away with it because they are not so personally offensive to them. Sorry but that’s not my deal, I judge people by their actions not by their p’s and q’s and Brad’s have been just as bad as Angelina’s and they still are. If anything the fact that he is not mental as she is only makes him worse IMO. Sorry Kate, on this we differ in a very big way.

    Reply
  44. Kate said on July 26th, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    I still maintain that the story would have never gone to press in Jan 05 as it was known. Too many people knew Keane, and no one went to press with it. No one. That is the bottom line. It was not a secret from anyone but outside the TMZ , ya know. It was just the dirty little secret that was bought off with suits. just the way I see it though from the windows I look out. :) we can debate this til the end of time , good luck with your project, safe travels. :)

    Reply
  45. Kate said on July 26th, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    Is that the best you could come up with out of my post?

    Reply
  46. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 26th, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate hun I have to say you are 100% wrong here. The scoop was not the story of the affair it was the first-hand interviews with staff members at the villa. That could have been published without any mention of whether or not Brangelina were already f*cking or not. I can’t put this into any other words than to say this is my day job, I know how it works because I get paid to do it. The doc I am doing now is based on a tape that we have managed to get access to that other people haven’t – that is the scoop that the programme has been commissioned on, it doesn’t necessarily have to be brand new information, just a new source. There are always many aspects to a story that you can’t include because while you know it to be the case you cannot stand it up. We have already had an extensive discussion with our lawyers about this and we know what we can and can’t say, what we can and can’t do. Just because you can’t say one thing doesn’t mean that you lose the whole scoop or story, it just means that you have to omit certain parts. Yes I agree that coming out with the news of Brange’s affair would not have been possible as they did not have a first-hand witness who caught them at it. The scoop would have been to describe how Brad and Jen were behaving through the eyes of the hotel staff. That is a story enough in itself, Angelina wouldn’t even need to be mentioned. There is nothing more I can say than this is what I do for a job Kate and I know how it works, it does not work the way you seem to think it does right now. Wny on earth would I be making such a big deal out of this if I did not know it to be the God’s honest truth?

    Reply
  47. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 26th, 2010 at 6:23 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    And with that said I am off to go try and get a f*cking scoop – will try to catch up with you all soon!

    Reply
  48. Kate said on July 26th, 2010 at 6:32 pm

    Keane, I get that hun, really I do, but I guess what I don’t quite get is why that would be a story, why would it matter, because several other publications came out with interviews that did discuss that, some said they were lovey , some said they did not until they saw a camera. Those were guests from what I remember, you can still google it, but all in all what difference does any of that make without busting the sex act, it is like reporting what Brange is doing right now, with out busting one of them with another person. It is a big, so what to most people..ya know lol.. I guess we think different on this.. or maybe because this is just not news to me. not sure.. but whatever, we agree to disagree, good luck on your story!

    Reply
  49. inthegray said on July 26th, 2010 at 7:49 pm

    Regarding what Keane says about “two people being culpable for their actions”, I totally get that with those two and why it is important to her. I am saying this from a point of view of not knowing anything about the PR machine, etc. I was watching the video of the unnecessary spectacle in the airport in Japan and I thought, “Actually, AJ seems rather charming.” For those that see her at face value and are not interested or aware of the hell she has brought upon others, not only JA, but the ramifications of abusing the adoption process (to name but a few), this is what people see. And, where does it stop with her, especially with her aspirations.

    Reply
  50. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 28th, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    @Kate:

    First-hand interviews with witnesses of a major news story are always a story. The staff members would have had way more contact with them than the guests and on a more consistent and intimate basis. If I was doing a doc on them, they would be on the top of my list of priorities to get to talk on camera about what they saw. They wouldn’t have done it though because it would have broken their confidentiality agreements. The reason I am making a big point of it is because this is how I know that Mel is lying and she is getting the info now from one of them, rather than then from the witnesses themselves. That and the skypes that she has not had a cease and desist order to stop either. Brange have just successfully sued NOTW for invasion of privacy over the divorce leak – you think they wouldn’t over their private conversations? Come on! They must think people are born yesterday. Thanks for the good wishes on my story – so far they are working! xx

    Reply
  51. Moi said on July 29th, 2010 at 11:51 am

    Kitty Kelly and Oprah?

    Reply
  52. Kate said on July 29th, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Keane, we do not have that law in the US that the UK does and she stated she did not get them illegally. Someone is giving them to her, probably from Brad’s side. You think he is going to sue her. Angie can not sue about those messages, they have nothing to do with her. As for the other thing, we just disagree about it, it is a non story to me. That is okay. I have read several other blogs with damaging info as well in the last week. Everyone has had enough of her and they are just not holding back anymore.

    Reply
  53. Kate said on August 6th, 2010 at 2:10 am

    so….

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

July 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Meta