IUC Blind: A-List Couple Running “Children’s Farm” outside Kuala Lumpur

Posted on May 31st, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

This superstar couple, according to one of their close friends, bought huge land in KL three years ago and have over 90 foster children living there – all illegally. According to the source, the couple call it their own “children’s farm”. Who can it be????

  • 61 Comments
  • Tags:
  1. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 31st, 2010 at 5:46 pm

    You cannot be serious?!

    Reply
  2. Patty anne said on May 31st, 2010 at 8:00 pm

    When I read this I immediately believed this to be about Jolie-Pitts, but surely even they would do better by these children than to create a “farm” to house them. I did a Google of Kuala Lumpur and it seems there are many established orphanages there that could use some real help. Only a narcissistic couple such as Brangelina would do something such as this rather than truly offer aid to all the orphanages. How far a few million dollars would go in that poor area; doctors, nurses, nannies, playground equipment, good food would be more humanitarian than to “own” orphans and house them on your “farm”. Child collecting is synonymous with the Jolie/Pitts.

    Reply
  3. Annika said on May 31st, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    I actually don’t think it sounds that bad. It’s probably an orphanage on a farm – probably a good life – freedom, nature, education, etc. I’m sure they’re not working them on the farm. Here in the U.S. we had a farm where teenage wards of the state lived and we called it the “farm”.

    Reply
  4. sunspot said on May 31st, 2010 at 10:01 pm

    I’d like to know the location of the “farm”. I am from KL.

    Reply
  5. purdy said on May 31st, 2010 at 11:10 pm

    Off hand, I don’t know where that place is (but will quickly find out). Who ELSE could it be except the kid collector. She was in The Bone Collector, wasn’t she? Anyhew, how long before this is revealed to the public, along with the “owners” of this farm? I feel like I really MUST know more about this abomination.

    Reply
  6. purdy said on May 31st, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    Isn’t Malaysia the place that Izzy or Catherine Heigl got her little girl? What about Meg Ryan’s little girl? Am I confusing the country here?

    Would like to hear more from Sunspot from KL.

    Reply
  7. Kate said on May 31st, 2010 at 11:27 pm

    Considering KL is a absolutely beautiful place , unbelievable architecture, amazing culture, entrancing at night, and not even remotely close to being considered on the level of one of their goodwill adventures where she dons her Hepburn angelic attire and he tags around with his camera, this is incredibly disturbing. There are some terrific programs for the kids there in the orphanages, and they are some of the fortunate ones. They are “growing a farm of orphans” you mean like a Facebook Farm for sucky sakes, their very own Farmville? That just takes my breath away . There is absolutely no reason for them to be doing that in one of the biggest billion dollar trafficking capitols of the world. I really hope it is to protect these kids from that. I have a hard time believing even these two would sink this low. If kids are there illegally they certainly can not find a legal home for them, can they? If they truly wanted to help there are plenty of ways to do so. There are thousands of families that would love to adopt internationally who do not have the means to do so. They could make that possible, sponsor families, adopt a family to adopt a child, help them with the expense of traveling abroad to adopt a child.

    Does that sound like this what they are doing? We have one who has friends who say she has muddied the lines and does not believe incest is wrong, thinks she would make beautiful children with her own sons? (don’t batter me, I did not say that, apparently she has a Judas for a friend) , and then we have Daddy who has been entranced with porn and gotten so involved with it he did not even know where to draw the line when photographing his own children. Bad enough the rape photos they did for MAMS for W in a family setting, but to follow it up with another W shoot of their own children with what comes dangerously symbolically close to kiddie porn. Did they not follow the Jon Bonet Ramsey case, or just not care?

    About 20 years ago there was a “cult” for lack of better works that had a motto called “If Not By Eight,i It is Too Late”, not kidding you. They published magazines, they traded their kids, disgusting as it is, still today there are similar clubs that feel it is perfectly normal and natural for children to have sex with adults.

    That is the problem with porn, it screws with ones sensibilities. Eventually one can not tell the difference from what is normal functional feelings and what is not. Ted Bundy showed us that, sadly. I am sure there are many who can share a few porn flicks with their mate and have a good intimate relationship and spice things up, but when you are dealing with someone who already has a missing link, a dark void, a totally obsession with darkness and death, and another one who is consumes with congenital sadness and looking for something, anything to ante that up to a better feeling, you are in the danger zone. Drugs are not enough, porn is not enough, threesomes are not enough, and it grows like a cancer.

    So wowee, hope this is because some place in all that darkness , there is a kindred spot where they both have for the innocence for children, and if means breaking the rules to protect them, they are willing to take the chance to do so, even if it means they would go to jail for doing so.

    If that is the case, I think that would be pretty cool. I have to believe that both of them would be willing to do that. They may be arrogant and do some ridiculous stuff, but evil, can’t buy that they are evil.

    Just have to have Hope and Faith that this is not the case and that good intentions are behind this.

    Reply
  8. Wrong said on June 1st, 2010 at 1:17 am

    Meg Ryan’s girl is from China, Katherine’s from South Korea, and Meg.Katherine are not part of a supercouple, so way off the mark here, Purdy

    Reply
  9. Boot Goot said on June 1st, 2010 at 1:25 am

    Ian, if you know something, why don’t you just come out and say it? This is just a cheesy attempt to spread your crap without “actually” saying something that you can’t back up. Well, at least Keane will have something to run that mouth about for the next couple days.

    Reply
  10. too curious said on June 1st, 2010 at 8:53 am

    @Kate:

    Kate usually I am one to truly look on the bright side and see good in most things BUT in this case i just can’t. I really can’t. It makes absolutely no sense for them to have a “children’s farm” to help children – they could certainly get the attention of the UN or other group seeking to stop/capture those who traffic children. And to keep it quiet? St. Angie?? Unfortunately I’m getting a sick feeling that child trafficking or a brothel with children may actually be their purpose.

    As for them being evil? Well, as you say the search for more and more to make them “feel” certainly opens the door for evil to creep in. It starts with a thrill and then becomes a profitable business, plus as a they get to laugh at the world about how brilliant they are to carry it off.

    I really hope this isn’t true, but of the superstar couples out there (and they aren’t many), these two seem to have less than normal interaction with their kids. Their couples faces show a lack of affect – they could be toting around bags of flour and look the same at least 90% of the time.

    Reply
  11. purdy said on June 1st, 2010 at 9:59 am

    Hi Wrong. I was by no means inferring that Meg Ryan or Heigl were part of this “farm”. I should have been more clear. I was simply ahead of my thoughts and wondered if this place might be some sort of adoption place.

    Reply
  12. Tamara said on June 1st, 2010 at 10:41 am

    You would think an orphanage on a farm where they are giving the children an education, medicine, good food and trying to place them with a good family for adoption would be a very good thing – BUT if this were true then how come we’ve never heard of it? This is the Brand we’re talking about, they don’t do anything without the accompanying PR – so if this were a good wholesome place then they would want us all to know about how wonderful they are, there would be pictures and press – so it makes me think that if this is their farm that there must be something very wrong.

    Reply
  13. colour said on June 1st, 2010 at 11:17 am

    Woa! Time to take some meds Ian! The voices in your head are NOT sources, And whatever they may tell you are NOT facts!

    Reply
  14. purdy said on June 1st, 2010 at 11:24 am

    Right colour.

    And, if Ian has information regarding wrongdoing on this purported children’s farm, then the authorities need to be contacted. This is, after all, about little ones who do not have the means to speak for themselves about any wrongdoing.

    Reply
  15. colour said on June 1st, 2010 at 11:33 am

    @purdy:

    That would be IF he really has information. I would bet a montly wage on the fact that he does not.
    I mean uh – use your brain: what kind of friend would tell something like that to a guy like Ian? Um does that make sense to you?

    I would be much more intesested into what happened to all the law suits Ian was theatening to file? Remember the one against the canadian talk sho hosts? What happened to that? All talk and no action?

    Reply
  16. Gitano said on June 1st, 2010 at 11:42 am

    Combining Kate’s and Tamara’s last comments. If this were Brangelina’s farm and they were up to good, we would have heard about it. So either it’s not their farm or they are up to no good. … Ian, either follow-up with additional information and answer the blind, or stop fabricating. If this is true something needs to be done.

    Reply
  17. Kate said on June 1st, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    @Tamara:
    Unfortunately the key word in this blind was “illegal” , which is why we have not heard about it, just kicks you in the stomach doesn’t it?

    Reply
  18. Kate said on June 1st, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    I know TC, I had to at least try though.

    Reply
  19. Kate said on June 1st, 2010 at 1:05 pm

    @Boot Goot:
    BG, then it would not be a BLIND ITEM would it? Take a tour around blindgossip.com and see if the owners there just come out and tell you anything, or at Ted C’s or Laineys’ or Entertainment Lawyers, although he does do reveals twice a year , July 4 and New Years. Ted very very rarely and Lainey one in a very rare great while.

    Ian does need to spice these up a bit more with clues to make them more concrete. They are more interesting when there are a few clues related to the past of the people involved. However you have already told us you are too good to participate in any discussion with the Brange so not sure why I am responding to you. This board is an anti Brange, always has been, you are not going to find anyone holding her hand here. Just a heads up, but I think you probably already know that.

    Reply
  20. colour said on June 1st, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    @Kate:

    Why would Ian need to spice this blind item up with more specific clues Kate? He knows that you will link anything negative with Jolie no matter if there are such neglectable things like clues or proofs. Everyone knows that YOU don`t need that!

    Reply
  21. Liz E. said on June 1st, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    It is rather unseemly the unfounded gossip some are willing, even eager, to believe without any proof. I have no idea who this is supposed to be and, of course, we have no idea if it is even true. BIs are notoriously easy to make up. Some gossip columnists are well known for simply fabricating BIs. But I believe the Jolie Pitt Foundation has supported SOS Villages around the world for many years. Jolie has been a financial backer even longer. SOS Villages can be found in Malaysia.

    How could a so called farm of that size which must need various support from outsiders (medical, food, maintenance, etc.) be kept a secret? If it is an SOS Village (which are widely respected) the alleged “illegality” could be something as innocuous as failure to get a permit to build or overcapacity.

    Reply
  22. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 1st, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    @Boot Goot:

    Thought you weren’t coming back this way ever again Boot Goot? But here you are as predictable as clockwork – fancy that!

    Reply
  23. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 1st, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    @colour:

    Hi Mia.

    Reply
  24. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 1st, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Oh blimey you again: the staunch, considered (almost lawyer-like in fact) defender of all things Angelina – things must be getting serious!

    So Ian is this what you meant by the “Angie neurones spread out like peanut butter….terrified of getting caught”? So we established that she was a thief in that post – are you saying that that is what she steals i.e. children? Like the group that came to take the children away from Haiti who all actually had parents? Is this really what you’re saying? This really is not something to make light of, if you know something Ian you have to spill it, end of story. And not on this blog that’s for sure.

    Reply
  25. Lurker said on June 1st, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    In case some of you have not figured it out yet, Kate , Keane and Patty Ann are Ian’s employees. How else do you explain their stupidities. Anything to keep this blog going. I Ian has a blind item about someone changing the color of the SKY, kate would have a theory as to why it is Angie and Brad. Get a damn life Kate, they have been together for more than 5 years and regardless of what you and your “friends ” here think are doing a lot of good things in the world. Can’t say the same about you.

    Reply
  26. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 1st, 2010 at 6:42 pm

    @Lurker:

    Wow this one has f*cking riled you hasn’t it? Always a good sign we’re going in the right direction!

    Oh and just FYI, instead of working for Ian I am actually working in an investment bank right now, helping to relieve some of the world’s wealthiest people of their hard-earned money (and making them even wealthier in the process of course) – not quite the same scenario as being paid to write posts on a gossip blog is it? Uh, nope!

    Reply
  27. Boot Goot said on June 2nd, 2010 at 12:59 am

    Keane, I didn’t say that. I said I wasn’t going on blog sites about Angelina, and this one isn’t about her. Except in YOUR mind. Lurker, thank you for your SANE comments!

    Reply
  28. colour said on June 2nd, 2010 at 1:03 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Oh come on Keane! This is getting ridiculous. Why the hell can`t you keep a job for more then 3 months? Within a year you worked for TV/radio, then for the government, then with handicapped children and now in an investment bank!

    Reply
  29. Kate said on June 2nd, 2010 at 2:11 am

    @colour:
    I meant for you sweets, Ian knows exactly what I think, he does not need to spice anything up for me.lol

    Reply
  30. Kate said on June 2nd, 2010 at 2:19 am

    @Lurker:

    Nice try, sigh, but I can assure you darling I do not need the money. I don’t work for anyone, others work for me. There is your first clue for my very private little blind for you, and it is also the reason why I don’t need a theory or to make anything ever fit the Brange.samcc. wink.wink

    Reply
  31. Kate said on June 2nd, 2010 at 2:23 am

    @colour:
    Do you realize how that sounds? Are you seriously keeping tabs on what Keane is doing from month to month,damn babe are you stalking her, that is ridiculous, this is just a blog. lol cripes. Are you keeping a journal by any chance?

    Reply
  32. colour said on June 2nd, 2010 at 3:50 am

    @Kate:

    A journal? Hardly – I just use my memory. By the way that question wasn`t for you Kate.

    Reply
  33. colour said on June 2nd, 2010 at 4:40 am

    A journal? Hardly I just use my memory. By the way that question wasn`t for you Kate!

    @Kate:

    Reply
  34. I'm on the bidet said on June 2nd, 2010 at 10:21 am

    Maybe this is where the kids get their clothes?

    Angelina Jolie Kids Boutique offers designer children’s clothing and accessories. We strive to bring you quality children’s clothing at discount prices.

    We are located at beautiful Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    anjelina jolie kids
    Lot 9929, Taman Harmonis,
    Jalan Gombak,
    53100 Kuala Lumpur
    013-4350155

    http://angelinajoliekids.blogspot.com/

    Reply
  35. Tamara said on June 2nd, 2010 at 10:23 am

    @Kate:
    LOL that is funny Kate – I read her comment to Keane and thought WTF!! It sounds like she’s following her every move lol Well, ,not that anyone would believe me, but I know for a fact that Keane, Kate and PattyAnne are definitely NOT on Ians payroll – this blog would be totally different, more cohesive with better stories if it were BELIIEVE ME lol not that you will hahaha samcc

    Reply
  36. Patty anne said on June 2nd, 2010 at 10:36 am

    Truly an adventurous life isn’t it? I guess many young women would love to be able to live such a way before they choose a career path to maintain. Rock on Keane! Love those scenic photos of the world in which you travel. One day we may be here discussing YOU, Oh! some do that already. Hummmmm@colour:

    Reply
  37. Patty anne said on June 2nd, 2010 at 10:41 am

    So after reading that, I now wonder if her “kids farm” in KL is actually a “sweat shop” of manufacturing clothing at discount retail sales? Being a diagnosed sociopath, Angie would have no qualms about doing so, and as for William Bradley Pitt, we all know by now that he enjoys his status-quo being rather happy in his unmade bed of life.@I’m on the bidet:

    Reply
  38. Gitano said on June 2nd, 2010 at 11:04 am

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Great find! Maybe there is a connection. They are using Jolie’s name and I’m sure that’s copyrighted or whatever. When was the last time Jolie was in Malaysia?

    Reply
  39. I'm on the bidet said on June 2nd, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    Kate and Keane on Ian’s payroll? Ridiculous!

    Clearly, Keane is a spy/assassin, taking various jobs to get closer to her targets, while Kate is the ‘M’ to Keane’s 007. They use this blog to pass coded messages about assignments.

    And if there is payroll, can I be on it? I won’t charge much, and you can pay me in Amazon gift certificates.

    -IOTB

    Reply
  40. Kate said on June 2nd, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    lol we have not progressed much have we, posters were singing this tune 18 months ago, by now they should be accusing us of owning the blog, not being employees. lol It does provide entertainment though when these posters pop up with these high school antics. Makes you wonder doesn’t it, they are not seen from or heard from for months and months and suddenly they appear like Jeanne out of her bottle. samcc.

    Reply
  41. Kate said on June 2nd, 2010 at 1:38 pm

    You have not figured out that Keane is my alter ego yet? samcc , hmmm, speed it up baby..you are behind the others.

    Reply
  42. Kate said on June 2nd, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    @Tamara:
    I laughed at that too, everyone around me did, every time I sign in at NJOB I think, we should open this up, but it would take just too much work to clean it up. lol Some good authors though, yes? :)

    Reply
  43. Tamara said on June 2nd, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    @Kate:
    Oh yes definitely – but Keane is working on that so maybe we should wait to see what she does, ?? But I am all for Im On the Bidet – she is a total crack up.

    Reply
  44. Kate said on June 2nd, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    @Tamara:
    Yes she is, wonderful sense of humor, love to read her comments. I actually enjoy the people who come here just to pee on our parade too at times, but only because it validates a few things. lol

    Reply
  45. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 2nd, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    @colour:

    Yes Mia, it’s called being freelance – have you ever heard of the concept sweetheart? Its what 90% of the workforce that makes up the industry is babe – time to do some swatting up! I have never had a permanent job nor ever plan to – it would bore me to tears. The longest I’ve ever worked in one place was a year before I went to college and 3 years in a Saturday job as a teenager. I’ve worked in nearly all the companies I’ve ever fancied working for in my life, and there is not one I would want to stay in permanently, not even the bbc. I like to keep it fresh, keep mixing it up, moving around and meeting new people in totally different worlds (that’s the point of making factual television programmes after all, an interest in life). And yes, the places I have worked at in the past year include somewhere close to government (in whitehall), two centres for children with complex health needs and conditions such as autism, two investment banks (one large, the other tiny, two entrepreneurs and a couple of other members of staff in fact), The Daily Mail, a fascinating multi-national mining company who are doing amazing, sustainable good work in Africa (the like of which Ms Jolie and friends can but dream of) and more! And yes its bloody interesting it really is, I have no idea how people stay in one place for longer than a few months when they could taste all these different lives. The place I’m working in right now offers deals to the super rich (it’s how many hundreds of billions you have darling, not hundreds of millions) such as buying premiership football clubs and financing the end of some very high profile films, and everything else inbetween. Very, very interesting indeed. Oh and today I got a call about working on a Gordon Ramsay show but it was too junior and not paying enough money so I declined. But yes, Mia, all I really want is a permanent job! LMAO

    Reply
  46. Patty anne said on June 2nd, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    Pay? I’m supposed to be paid for this? Well why didn’t someone inform me. IAN~! Ah Waaant Mah Moneeee , in my best Jolie whiney voice. Seriously though, what we post here comes from the heart, not from hate. Jolie is pathetic and very wrong in many scarey ways, and she has six littles who depend upon her. If anyone of you saw a truck running away heading toward six children playing in a playground wouldn’t you speak up at the very least? I’m proud to be among women, and men, who will stick themselves out there in the name of good over evil. Hey Ian? Iz mah check in the mail? LOL

    Reply
  47. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 2nd, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    @Tamara:

    IT’S MIA – I recgnise the syntax every time!

    Reply
  48. Justcoming said on June 2nd, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    You worked for The Daily Mail? I’m surprised you didn’t settle down there, babe. They talk your language.

    Reply
  49. colour said on June 2nd, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Hey I wouldn`t trade my permanent job for anything. In the beginning I too couldn`t see myself working anywere for long but today – after ten years – I can honestly say that I like my job a lot more then when I started. Having a full-time job and rarely coming home any later then 4 pm is kinda nice too.

    Reply
  50. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 2nd, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    @colour:

    That’s fascinating Mia – thanks for the insight into your life!

    Reply
  51. keane cyber queen supreme said on June 3rd, 2010 at 3:54 am

    @ Justcoming – maybe I will my friend, maybe I will! We shall see. Won’t be such a willig outlet for Angie’s PR then though will it? You may have to look for another mule to carry your propaganda! Oh and just FYI, The Mail is generally a right-wing, middle England representing, celeb PR-infested publication so doesn’t exactly represent my views (if you were more informed on the British press you would obviously have known that). Nonetheless it does have a huge readership which is why everyone from the worlds of publishing and showbiz want their product to be featured in it. In other words, its a great marketing device. But then, you already knew that didn’t you? After all that “teenage” pic of Angie pre 2nd and 3rd nose job was splashed all over the cover of The Irish Mail the last day I was working there with the headline: “Angelina’s naked teenage (cough, bullshit, cough) ambition”. Nothing like a bit of mindless, sexy PR to bury another bad story hey jimmy boy?

    Reply
  52. Emily said on June 3rd, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    Pay? I’m supposed to be paid for this? Well why didn’t someone inform me. IAN~! Ah Waaant Mah Moneeee , in my best Jolie whiney voice. Seriously though, what we post here comes from the heart, not from hate. Jolie is pathetic and very wrong in many scarey ways, and she has six littles who depend upon her. If anyone of you saw a truck running away heading toward six children playing in a playground wouldn’t you speak up at the very least? I’m proud to be among women, and men, who will stick themselves out there in the name of good over evil. Hey Ian? Iz mah check in the mail? LOL

    Reply
  53. Tamara said on June 3rd, 2010 at 6:09 pm

    @Emily:
    That is so wierd – why did you C&P Patty’s comment? I started reading it and said Wait a minute, this is Patty’s – lol

    Reply
  54. Patty anne said on June 3rd, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    I guess she agrees with my take on this, wanted to repeat it for emphasis. Just one thing, if you ccp another’s post, please point that out by putting it in quotes. It would help us to know who said what when. Thanks Emily – whoever you may be. :-) @Tamara:

    Reply
  55. Patty anne said on June 3rd, 2010 at 7:08 pm

    I remember reading somewhere that today’s young working individual will have several careers during their lifetime much unlike the previous generation. I would say economics play a big part in this, but yes, I agree with that observation. I’ve had three very different careers in my working life: GS-7 Civil Service, Medical Records Clerk, and LPN. Not in that order of course, nor all at once, now THAT would be difficult. But what I am trying to say is there is no good reason for anyone to tie themselves to one career if, i repeat IF, they wish to try another. It’s all out there for those willing to work for it and enjoy living. I’m very glad that I did.

    Reply
  56. Boot Goot said on June 12th, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    Keane, Kate, Patti anne… just so you know, I work for the highest levels of government, previously, I was in the CIA, worked as Vice President for a while, ran a huge corporation for several years, but now, I am just staying in a beautiful, historic hotel (Tudor construction, of course. Love that!) and spending endless hours trying to impress other loafers with my vast knowledge, attempting to smear the character of any famous person whose name crosses my path. I do it, not because I am an envious asshole, but for a higher good. These people have children and I need to protect them. You see, the one thing I am above all others
    is PERFECT! Despite my busy(body) big-shot schedule, I am able to devote endless hours maligning these people and I congratulate myself royally (you see, I am English, therefore very closly akin to royalty) for being the shallow, cruel, hypocrite that I have revealed myself to be through my endless finger-pointing, harping, and judging of others. Oppps… gotta go! Ian, the (blatent) liar has just posted another thinly vieled, character bashing innuindo about Jolie/Pitt, and I must rush off to jump on the bandwagon and make a fool of myself. Talk to you next time I feel the need to try to impress someone. TA ta.

    Reply
  57. forex robot said on July 2nd, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

    Reply
  58. Pattyanne said on July 2nd, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    Don’t waste your time, you failed to impress me completely. A little honesty would go a whole lot further yano, and this isn’t a pissing contest if only one is in competition. :-) @Boot Goot:

    Reply
  59. Kate said on July 2nd, 2010 at 6:32 pm

    @ Boot Goot

    Is this Full Disclosure, no can’t be since Morticia is not here among us , or is she. lol I think I know which one you are though.

    Reply
  60. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 2nd, 2010 at 7:40 pm

    @Boot Goot:

    Just to f*ck up your christmas even more James, can I just add to that that I am now making a film with one of the coolest, most respected and multi-award-winning (including two BAFTAs my friend) directors in the business? Oh and I got a few other projects in the works too – some of which might be of interest to ya one day. Oh and yeah that hotel was bloody great ta, I would highly recommend it. (You know, if you and Ange are ever in Devon and need a little PRIVACY!). And yeah life is going bloody great right now, I could not be happier. And no I am not trying to impress anyone, just sharing my happiness with my friends. (But I appreciate you will not get that on so many levels!). Try not to be a bitter critter, good things come to those who do good to others…. one day your ship will come in James, one day. :-)

    Reply
  61. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on July 2nd, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    @Boot Goot:

    Oh and just an FYI: I absolutely loathe the royalty and am a passionate anti-monarchist. If you’re gonna try to satirise me may at least try to get some of the facts right! Come over and chat to me when your done defending Angie’s ass on FF, TMZ and DListed. You must be working round the clock these days to protect that pay cheque and sound like you could do with a bit of “me” time. But, let’s face it, if you weren’t doing this what would you be doing right now – it’s not like there’s a lot else you’d be qualified for is there? Like Angie said in her (paid for by daddy) oscar acceptance speech – where would she be without you? Back in the old drugs den smoking crack with her whacked out buddies I’d say, and you’d be collecting welfare. Just sayin’!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

May 2010
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Meta