IUC World Exclusive: Angie to Brad – “You better Marry Me by June 4th or else I’m leaving”

Posted on May 4th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Angie has a major birthday wish this year. This just in from a source on the set of her new flick with Johnny Depp, The Tourist. “I overheard Angie on her cell,” the source told IUC. “It sounded as if Brad was on the phone with her. I was shocked when I saw Angie with a huge smile saying ‘you better marry me by June 4th or else I’m leaving.” Developing…angie-and-brad

  1. Kate said on May 4th, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    That is contradictory isn’t it? If she is giving him a ultimatum, why is she smiling? What is this a major birthday, she is not turning 40, or is she lol? This sounds like bs..I don’t doubt she has said it in the past, but according to most she does not want him, he does not want her, you have said that yourself. Does this really make any sense to you Ian?

    Reply
  2. HisHighness said on May 4th, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    @Kate:
    sounds like she was goading him, saying it in gest.

    Reply
  3. hphotsauce said on May 4th, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    Ian, why would she be goading him? Are they are planning to get married and to skirt the whole ‘we won’t marry until everybody can’ issue, they’ll say that they had to marry or Angie would leave.

    OR (I’m more inclined to believe this) is that they are breaking up and the PR reason will be Brad’s refusal to marry. Yep, I’m going with that. What are your thoughts Ian?

    Reply
  4. Kate said on May 4th, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    I see, but that sounds a bit playful for the state of things don’t you agree..or is SR suggesting that they have a wedding planned at the beautiful gardens with a Lama?

    I can’t imagine he would marry her at this point, do you think she is pregnant? She sure has a terrible gut on her or bad posture.

    Reply
  5. keane cyber queen supreme said on May 4th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Ian come on they have a contract to separate on a specified date, that’s why Brad and fam have stuck it out this long. This is business, nothing to do with birthdays or weddings or silly threats. They are spinning this nonsense out for as long as they can manage to wrench the very last dollar out of their brand for as long as they can and to try to sell her turkey action flick and his not-so-turkey but not-so-commercial either project, Tree of Life. Anyone who thinks otherwise or gives one second of credence to this bluff is either crazy or stupid or both. Angelina can wear a padded bra and stick her stomach out and try to look alluring next to Jonny Depp all she likes, but no-one is going to buy that nonsense or even care. Fittingly, that ship has long since sailed. She has long stopped making the covers with this angle, unfortunately though, as far as Brad goes at least,she has run out of angles. Time to get a new showmance Angelina, or risk fading into obscurity. JMO!

    Reply
  6. Lizzy said on May 4th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    This post seems kinda pointless but I would just like to say I really am dumbfounded as to how she has been able to build the image she has in her movies. I have never seen her working out, heard her talking about working out, or saw a muscle on her body. Even when she did tomb raider she wasn’t really muscular just fuller…. how do people buy that she is an “action star”?? Physical fitness is important as well as being healthy, especially when you have children and she doesn’t seem to think very highly of either… but then again she is just a recovering heroin addict with no regard for her body.

    Reply
  7. Lizzy said on May 4th, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Agreed but you have to wonder who would be stupid enough to get involved with her after this?? Any thoughts?? She’s coming with a lot of baggage…

    Reply
  8. WTF said on May 4th, 2010 at 2:21 pm

    @HisHighness:
    so how does it make this an exclusive – something allegedly said in jest?

    Reply
  9. I'm on the bidet said on May 4th, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Ah, so it was a common “inside the relationship” jest, just like us normal folk do . . . if it was in fact Brad on the other end of the line. Could be any number of people, and while you may expect I’ll suggest it was James Haven, instead I’m going to put forth that there was nobody else on the phone; in fact, it is a toy phone she lifted from her kids. On that phone, Angie has magical, intimate conversations with Giena, an imaginary, hermaphroditic version of Angie herself, the only entity capable of understanding Angie with sympathy, while at the same time having the equipment to address her vacillating sexual preferences. I have this on authority from a bottle of tequila and a hentai website, by which I mean I’m making it all up, but I prefer this version to the reality of schmoopy goo-goo talk within the Brangelina construct.

    Ian, are you going to talk about the time you walked into the elevator and AJ was there? Or did I miss that?

    -IOTB

    Reply
  10. convenience said on May 4th, 2010 at 2:54 pm

    Really enjoyed this! Well done!

    Reply
  11. Kate said on May 4th, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    I have to admit this sort of sounds like Ian is playing along with Angie on this..kind of wondering why, some sort of trade off like Tiger did with the NE..the reason we never heard about some of the things we were suppose to get in the book, is that part of the deal, Ian..you mentioned if I remember that the rape story was a page out of your book, was not in there . Not that it matters , but many things were not, so what hphotsauce said makes sense..feed you this stuff for awhile and give you the break up story in exchange for holding back. I also remember there was some heavy bargaining with Angie right before you finished it, extending that Olive Branch..just saying..guessing you are playing with us a bit here. You obviously could have done far worse damage to her than to Bullock..but you chose not to..had to be a reason.

    Reply
  12. Tinkuy said on May 4th, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    actually she said, “You better shave that raggedy-ass beard off by June 4th or else I’m leaving.”

    Reply
  13. sickitten said on May 4th, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    Nah, they are broken up and have been for over a year. Ever since it was clear that the twins’ developmental disabilities came to light. They are fueding and she is on some sort of anti-depressant over it all. Probably in an effort to kick the opiate demons and dealing w/the fact that her babies are challenged. I’ve been saying on my site since early October ‘09. It’s not hard to see through these people if you’ve lived it all.

    Reply
  14. ladybert62 said on May 4th, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    Goat-Boy was heard laughing manically in the background and whispering with his eyes raised upwards, “Please god, please, just get me through to June 5th – then when she is gone, I will be good again, I promise! Please god, please!” Ha ha :D (I dont buy the marriage story: angie’s fax machine/fake rumor network is on overload!)

    Reply
  15. Butthurt said on May 4th, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    Staged call. Probably to time and temperature. Just testing to see who is feeding Ian and to see if Ian is performing like the good little blogger pet he is.

    Reply
  16. Please get married said on May 4th, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    I dare you to get married ….. (maybe this will help)

    I really hope they do…. they can stick together… it is better for the kids

    THE TRIANGLE WILL GO AWAY

    Jen will be free from those two

    Reply
  17. jan/sa said on May 4th, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    i really believe they will get married and i think it is better for the kids and 4 years down the line he will have more power when they divorce. jen is so over this and i think this is the best as them maybe we will not have jen pulled into this traingle and she can go back to the privacy she enjoys and have a normal life without the paps dogging her step sll the way. and hopefull they will fade into the sunset and we will be spared their constant pr and media horing jmo

    Reply
  18. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 4th, 2010 at 5:25 pm

    “Got your back baby. And your back end”. SR, whenever, 2009.

    If I were to write a book about Brangelina I would write about the following things:

    What happened to the $14 million they received from People for the photos of the “twins” – which charities did it go to and how about the interest?

    What was the deal with Holly telling Entertainment Tonight that the twins had been born, followed by Brangelina’s denial and an attempt to cover it up with the obviously bogus “Holly doesn’t even have a blackberry” line (except for the time when she was photographed using one)?

    What was the deal with the three adoptions – were any of them legit and are any of the children actually orphans? If not, why were their parents persuaded to give them up to multi-millionaire couple Brangelina?

    Why were all of the biological children delivered outside the US?

    Why are all her “humanitarian” activities conveniently timed after or as a long prelude to some very bad press?

    What is the truth about her relationship with James?

    How much money are they making about their staged “candid” photo opps with the children?

    Do they have big bucks financial deals with brands to promote their products in photo opps and in press releases (so-called “stories” from a “source”)?

    How much plastic sugery has she really had and what?

    How has she got away with not just a “mean-spirited” vendetta against the woman whose husband she stole but an utterly vicious and disgusting one?

    How the values she has symbolised through her PR have set the feminist movement back by about 50 years.

    How many nannies does she have and do the children really live in a separate house when they’re in France with them rather than Brange?

    To what extent do Brangelina parent them at all?

    Why would anyone be so obsessed with garnering publicity and attention that they would do or say anything to get/keep it? AKA what is wrong with her?

    And plenty more besides, but that’s just a start.

    I wonder if Andrew Morton will cover any of this in his book. And if he doesn’t, well all I can say is there’s an opportunity. Most of this stuff is already out there. Not too difficult to throw it all together. Interesting.

    Reply
  19. Boot Goot said on May 4th, 2010 at 5:50 pm

    Oh my God! Mention the word “Angie” and all the nutcases on the web crawl out with their dark, evil schematics, and rank, downright frightening conjectures. What the hell is the deal? Some of you poor people should really consider writing horror stories. You already have your evil witch. Not since Cotten Mather has such a zealous hunt been undertaken. All you need is access to Angelina, a pack of matches, a pint of petro, and the evil intent your hearts already possess, and PRESTO! A fire of rightous passion. BURN HER, GUYS!!! Before she destroys the world!!!

    Reply
  20. I'm on the bidet said on May 4th, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    @Boot Goot:
    Don’t be ridiculous!! We are all Cruiseian Scientologists here, and merely want to put her on a spaceship for re-programming by Xenu. We’ll even put her in first-class spaceship seating, with a complimentary plate of nachos and a room-temperature diet Dr. Pepper. Thanks for visiting BG!

    Reply
  21. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 4th, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    @Boot Goot:

    Incorrect. All you need is a publisher. And then contacts at one of the biggest selling newspapers in the country to ideally serialise it for you. :-)

    P.S. That put the wind up you didn’t it?

    Night all!

    Reply
  22. HisHighness said on May 4th, 2010 at 7:15 pm

    working on a blockbuster about BP – coming soon!

    Reply
  23. Coherence said on May 4th, 2010 at 7:15 pm

    If everyone knows your birthday wish, it won’t come true.

    Reply
  24. Boot Goot said on May 4th, 2010 at 9:32 pm

    Ian, Ian, Ian, ANOTHER blockbuster? This time, about Brad Pitt? Come on fella, quit with the “blockbuster’s”.
    Just hire a decent staff, rake a little muck, smear it here for us to read, and we’ll all have a grand time. But, the whole thing of hiring “sources” that will tell any old tall tale for its shock value, or (shudder) just making the stuff up youself, isn’t cutting it. ( I STILL haven’t gotten over the poorly advised dukey-smearing, shotgun brandishing scenario, or the 17 tapes of JJ displaying his nazi shizz.) You can do it! You just gotta try harder.

    Reply
  25. Kate said on May 4th, 2010 at 10:31 pm

    IOTB that was brilliant and hilarious!

    Reply
  26. Kate said on May 4th, 2010 at 10:35 pm

    Ian great , hope it is a blockbuster..but it is going to take something huge for it to be a blockbuster about Brad Pitt..if you were talking about Brad, who else is BP?

    I mean, serious, to tell us he is bi , or gay, or anything remotely close to that will hardly do it. Datalounge and Billy at F2G has been bantering that around for years.

    we’ll see..:)

    Reply
  27. I can see you said on May 5th, 2010 at 12:16 am

    set-up

    Reply
  28. Kate said on May 5th, 2010 at 1:00 am

    @I can see you:
    lol could be seems half the internet believes a wedding is in the works and they are all on fire about it. I suppose it would be their big FU to the paps, but who cares, they are the ones who have to live with each other. If they do get married, let’s hope it is because they have worked out things. Not holding my breath on that one though.

    Reply
  29. alif said on May 5th, 2010 at 1:30 am

    As usual, everything about AJ is orchestrated. Ho Hum!

    BP is not my idea of an interesting subject. A person has to have talent, charisma, masculinity, wear the pants in the family, etc! etc! in order to make a good subject for exploring. jmo!

    Good Luck, Ian. Hope you do well with this!

    Reply
  30. crouching tiger said on May 5th, 2010 at 7:12 am

    @Kate:
    By the way, why Ian called Brad bi? Has he been with a man? Who?
    And I know Ian claimed Jen is bi? Did he change his claim or he’s still sure Jen is bi?

    Btw, this article seems like Jolie playing with this “source”, kinda like trapping into knowing who leaks all her story.

    Reply
  31. Patty anne said on May 5th, 2010 at 10:29 am

    Kate, IF they do marry, legally and not some island gibberish ceremony like the last time, it will put Brad in a position of power when they officially divorce. Is Angie that stupid? Not that I can tell by her sometimes brilliant PR moves to protect the phony image she has painstakingly built. I seriously doubt they will ever set foot in America again as a married couple. Brad has the law on his side in the event she goes off the deep end as there are laws to have her committed for a minimum of 72 hours for psych study. She will never risk it. No wedding, at least not a legal and binding one.@Kate:

    Reply
  32. Kate said on May 5th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    @Patty anne:
    At the very least it would take them out of the triangle and there goes about 90 percent of the tab sales. lol I really doubt there is a wedding. I think she is bored with him , who knows..:) I would bet AJ knows that the Brange just does not sell well without Jen. She would have to quickly find a new adversary. samcc..to make it interesting.

    Reply
  33. Kate said on May 5th, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    Ian said in a chat no about Jen, Ted has claimed Brad is bi, Ian has, and there was a magazine article about two years ago that ran a article with the title “Bi-sexual Brad Pitt ..blah blah blah” forgotten who that was, not a tabloid. I wondered why he never refuted that but he did not, it was before Ted or Ian began speculating on this. IDK if he is, don’t believe he is gay , but would not surprise me if he was bi-curious and is now actively bi-sexual. Ian claimed in his book that Brad was one of a handful of the only straight guys in the industry. so..DK…toss a coin.

    Reply
  34. Reality Check said on May 6th, 2010 at 8:51 am

    Why would they ever want to get married? I think it’s so strange that Brad has been dragging his feet for so long but maybe when he weighed his physical attraction to her against her history of brother-kissing, self-mutilation, lesbianism, drugs and hotel lovers, he realized that, after all, it took a lot more than a beautiful face and great sex to marry someone. But it was too late – as a smart ho, she already had his child, so he had to stick with her unless he wanted to see his entire career ruined.

    I think the reason he didn’t marry her earlier was that this was the only thing over which he still had control, so he didn’t do it. My guess is that Angelina is simply waiting for him to get tired and realize he has nowhere to go with so many kids in the picture. Maybe he used to entertain some hope that he would be able to get out of the relationship with her at some point, but now reality sets in and he knows he can’t.

    They have never looked in love, as far as I’m concerned. People in love can’t be mistaken for others. If you have true love for someone, you are not afraid to put it on paper on the pretext that your signature may kill it someday and you don’t wait for everyone to be legally allowed to marry, so you could marry, too. That’s a red herring and doesn’t have anything to do with the matter in hand.

    Reply
  35. Kate said on May 6th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    @Reality Check:
    He could easily get out of that comment and did. When he interviewed in 2008 with Ann Curry, they were split then I believe, she said to him, “I asked Angie when you were getting married, and she said -ask Brad” lol he looked like he was going to faint. It was one of those New Orleans interviews. That went to a commercial, he came back and said she blindsided him, laughed and mumbled, well, “no need to but I guess if we think it is ever that important to the kids we might” something to that effect.

    If she is pregnant , planning a wedding and having a wedding would garner them some more attention to deflect Andrew Morton’s book, wouldn’t it? lol but who does stupid things like that. After all the hoopla, about 6 months later, then it will be all about the divorce. Otherwise, they will just be a bored married couple with six surly’ kids, and Jen will be out of the picture as far as the tabloids go ..so there gos about 99 percent of the interest.

    That is why I would be surprised if they got married. Hard to milk that triangle like that. :)

    Reply
  36. Reality Check said on May 7th, 2010 at 11:20 am

    @Kate:
    Nice explanation, Kate, it does make a lot of sense. As for me, I do believe that if you truly love someone, you don’t wait for so long. Since both Brad and Angelina have shown that “tact” is not in their vocabulary, I don’t think they didn’t marry because they wanted to be tactful to Jennifer – I’m sure they would have roared with laughter at the very suggestion. For five whole years, Angelina has never missed the chance to talk to the press about the bliss she found with a man who was married when she met him and who divorced because of her. My impression is that her boasting stopped after she didn’t get an Oscar for “The Changeling”, which was preceded by Jennifer’s “uncool” comment in W magazine – I wonder if the bitch sees these two facts as related. As far as I’m concerned, she’s in the same league with Rielle Hunter and isn’t any different mentally and morally – they are equally cruel, equally tactless, equally unconcerned about the pain they cause. The only reason she fared a lot better than Rielle and got away with murder after her affair with Pitt is that she looks better.

    Reply
  37. Kate said on May 8th, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @Reality Check:
    lol maybe this is what the major row was about, Brad said, “in your dreams , no freaking way am I going to marry you, and that is not my kid you are carrying either” ha ha! maybe he has had enough of it and has told her to take of the padding. j/k

    Reply
  38. Reality Check said on May 9th, 2010 at 9:24 am

    I have been interested in psychology for quite a time and read once that when a woman gets pregnant to tie a man down, the father usually feels deep anger at the child and the relationship never fares as well as it should. To put my two cents in, I don’t think Pitt ever planned to knock Jolie up back in 2005 – it must have been one of those accidental-on-purpose pregnancies the women like her use to get what they want. As soon as she got pregnant, though, she was in control and could dictate the rules in this relationship because she knew he would be too scared to risk his reputation and come across as the asshole that cheats on his wife with a co-star, then gets the co-star pregnant and dumps her out of the blue because he had second thoughts about her. The public would be so shocked! His image would be in the gutter and he knew it – hence all the comedy with the perfect family; perfect but unlegalized under all kinds of funny and contrived pretexts: gay rights and the like. :)

    Reply
  39. Boot Goot said on May 15th, 2010 at 4:28 am

    Where’s the BP blockbuster?

    Reply
  40. forex robot said on May 17th, 2010 at 1:36 am

    nice post. thanks.

    Reply
  41. cna training said on May 21st, 2010 at 4:42 am

    Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

    Reply
  42. lurkeyloo said on June 28th, 2010 at 11:31 am

    Soooo…it is now June 28th….and?????????

    Reply
  43. [...] Angelina’s 35th birthday. Where is this info coming from? Well, an “insider” with pretty keen hearing said, “I overheard Angie on her cell…it [...]

  44. [...] IUC World Exclusive: Angie to Brad – “You better Marry Me by June … Maybe I should marry a foreign husband? or risk infidelity with a …yes! i will marry you! « black rosesMarry Juana? | American Buddhist NetBoxer Amir Khan wants to marry Cheryl ColeSeth Green, Clare Grant marry in Northern California vineyard …» Apple Buys Chip Company Dvorak Uncensored: General interest …Most American Adults Seek Information on Government Spending and …New book offers travel guide information to South Africa – world …Auto Insurance Quotes Without Personal Information | Technology …Love me love will never regret it | Beautiful Life View the Contact Powered by Video [...]

  45. [...] a fost publicată, ieri,  de Ian Halperin pe blogul său. Jurnalistul susţine că pontul i-a fost oferit de o sursă aflată în apropierea [...]

  46. [...] Source : IUC World Exclusive [...]

  47. [...] Source : IUC World Exclusive [...]

  48. World Wide News Flash said on October 20th, 2010 at 1:53 am

    IUC World Exclusive: Angie to Brad ? ?You better Marry Me by June ……

    I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

May 2010
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Meta