Comments on: IUC World Exclusive: Behind the Bullock/James Peace Accord

By: Boot Goot

Boot Goot — Thu, 06 May 2010 22:33:55 +0000

Ian, is that story about JJ and SB’s “peace accord” still gestating? Did your “sources” dry up? Where are the JJ nazi videos and the (most awaited) SD shotgun film? If you can’t produce them, please issue a public apology to JJ and SB. It is the only gentlemanly thing to do. (You don’t wanna be called a liar, a shit spreader, and someone who kicks others when they are down, do you?)

By: forex robot

forex robot — Tue, 04 May 2010 02:06:00 +0000

nice post. thanks.

By: keane cyber queen supreme

keane cyber queen supreme — Sun, 02 May 2010 14:56:23 +0000

Thanks Ian and does that answer your question Mememe? Maybe you could try your luck with Kate instead – maybe she will indulge you! Lol

By: HisHighness

HisHighness — Sun, 02 May 2010 13:18:52 +0000

@Mememe: Keane is always welcome here.

By: Wolfette

Wolfette — Sun, 02 May 2010 01:52:45 +0000

@curious:
what makes it not possible at this time is no one has proven a damn thing,read up on how JJ came across the hat.and any one that knows the history of the Iron cross knows it was around long before hitler showed his ugly mug, descrating it by adding a swastica to the center of it.During King William Fredrick the III ’s rein the Iron cross was only given out in the highest of regard when battling Neapolan,and not that many were giving out,it was resureccted agian in 1870 and used agian By Emperor william the I during the franco-Prussian war,since then till Hitler it was over used in some historians opinions ,and was definately tainted by hitler who also recieved one second grade.What I,m getting at is this Cross does not signifiy Hitlers rein it is however always paired with it,Bikers like it because of the design and symbol it means strength courage and honor The Iron Cross,Hitler tainted the cross not the other way around,and I counter with just because he is a celeb does not make him guilty it just makes it harder for him to be judged fairly and your right that is our fault.as for the swastica on his board I say so what Hitler is dead and long gone,Speaking from the victims stand point I refuse to give anyone or anything that much hold on me ever!As for SB and when and how she got her beautiful child there is always going to be the conspriosy therorist won,t there Just like Dilinger .look how long it took to convice folks it was actually him that was killed that fated day outside the movie theator.I guess my real point here is no matter what happens these two will always be hated and destrusted or loved and trusted in the end ,that’s how it is,that’s how it always is.

By: Mememe

Mememe — Sat, 01 May 2010 23:06:56 +0000

@keane cyber queen supreme:
WTF? The Great Keane is calling you out on your claims quote: “And you say you have worked in PR for a lot of different organisations and were also a Researcher in TV and radio? That is an interesting and quite confusing career path – how did that come about?” Why would someone intelligent be threatened by anyone else’s claims??? Every damn time!!! She did it to that poster SZ (who btw is exactly as she claimed to be) Great fail there Keane! No I am not SZ before you go and accuse. I have been here since Ian started this blog. I have had many intelligent conversations with lots of people here. I don’t trey and throw my seniority around like some of you. I find Kate’s comments to be refreshing, she doesn’t attack every poster that claims to be in your “career area” and she has lots of couth imo. Honestly Keane you are not the only person in the world that has a career. The way you act it’s like you are bitter about something. Wonder what that is??? Do tell us why you are threatened? If you aren’t then why don’t you run along like a good little troll and quit pestering people. Looks like Ian has tried to take this blog in a new direction and you keep on with the same old drivel. I don’t have to divulge my career but I can tell you that I see right through you. Do Ian a favor and piss off!

By: curious

curious — Sat, 01 May 2010 15:11:35 +0000

@Wolfette:
To answer your questions, I myself have been interested in reading and learning about the different good or evil characters that were part of our history. This includes Hitler, Gandhi, Cleopatra, Einstein etc. I understand that someone can be interested in learning and reading about these people. People who, good or bad, scarred history. For me there is a difference between reading and and learning about world war II and its leaders and having my pictures taken in the specific Nazi attire, doing the mimic, having swastikas on my surf board or a collection of nazi memorabilia and..being surrounded by people known to be white supremacists. Has for him being a man whore = let’s look at the news lately..I think we can name many people with that title..Him working at chopper = As a personal response, being the owner of one, love choppers and did watch his show on many occasions. The point of my message was that I have a hard time with how some celebrities are elevated to almost god like figures, made to be perfect with no flaws and the PR machine behind them to cover up the mess. For PR to do damage control , It’s ok..That’s part of the job but to use children in the process…That is unacceptable..That was my point.
As for Jesse James, maybe being a neo nazi, what makes it not possible? because he is a celebrity? how many people do we know in our entourage that have views and beliefs we do not agree on?! The difference is, it is not broadcast for the world to know.

By: keane cyber queen supreme

keane cyber queen supreme — Sat, 01 May 2010 13:37:35 +0000

@ danielle – so you deplore the exploitation of the life of a human being to further/save the career of a stupid celebrity but you think it is just fine with you if it constitutes a “brilliant PR” move and that all concerns for the child’s welfare are thereby wiped out?! That makes a lot of sense – you are obviously a very sensitive and deep human being!

And you say you have worked in PR for a lot of different organisations and were also a Researcher in TV and radio? That is an interesting and quite confusing career path – how did that come about?

And you say I have taken on exposing Brangelina as my personal vendetta – you must have been reading this blog for some time then as I haven’t commented on them much lately – and yet you have only now decided to comment – how curious! And I see why you would want to talk this action of Sandra’s up as a “brilliant PR move” and in no way an exploitation of an innocent and vulnerable young child’s life considering what light it throws on Angelina’s deeds – if I were in your position I would do that too as it’s going to raise some rather awkward questions for her isn’t it? Just like Octomom all over again! And no matter how much you tell her to pad her bra and stick out her stomach for the paps, no-one is going to buy that she’s pregnant. But even if she is, sadly, no-one will care. Oh and I can also see why you would want to divert me to TomKat as my main target, but sadly I know my own mind and I know which are the greater sinners of the two. Yes TomKat pimp out their child, but at least it is only one child and she has not been ripped from an orphanage at 5 minutes notice and been sold to the highest bidder the very next day. And at least Suri looks like she has a bond with her mother and is vaguely happy when photographed. The same cannot be said for the Brange kids can it? And yes I 100% agree that no celebrity out there does not employ spin, but it is the lengths the celeb is prepared to go to to get there, the people they are prepared to exploit(including vulnerable children, orphans and refugees) to achieve it, the hate campaigns they are prepared to wage against other individuals and the fallacious, sexist arguments they are prepared to use to achieve their ends which is the issue at stake. And for that Brangelina are the numero uno offenders par excellence. So if you wanted me to reinstate my case with more vigour than there you have it. Have a good week-end!

By: Wolfette

Wolfette — Sat, 01 May 2010 08:02:09 +0000

@Boot Goot: I m assuming she has an assistant that would do that,weather they would look in here is unknown.I do believe she already had the child ,maybe that was what he was going to "use " agianst her in his desperation to keep her.Honestly I think alot of this os over blown,did he cheat on her,yes! is he a pig,yes! is he a racist jury is still out on that one,after all there are no pictures surfacing all thats out there is the words of a bunch of slutty woman and some "unknown" source.s these girls saw a chance at some money and took it,look how soon it came on the heels of tiger woods I,m betting thats what made Bombshell decide to do what she did.JJ will have to pay for a long time over this mess,I don,t think the (choke) ladies should get a pass.I,m tired of it always being "just" the mans fault,these woman knew he was married and saw only dollar signs not caring about who got hurt long as they got theirs,they are not innocent by a long shot after all look at what they all do for a living these woman could pick a married man out of a crowd of hundreads its their livelyhoood after all.

By: Boot Goot

Boot Goot — Sat, 01 May 2010 07:19:41 +0000

Wolfette, I don’t know if there ARE any nazi colectables. Maybe I missed them, but all I really saw implicating Jesse was the picture with the hat and salute. There was Ian’s big promise of tons of, (I think, 17) videos of Jesse in Nazi regalia, and various “sources” that had witnessed his piles of memorabilia. But did anyone ever really produce anything, other than the one picture? (And his association with the nazi ho, of course.) I thought the discussion about her having the baby circumcised to ward off suspicion of her being a neo nazi, and that she was German, so she was nazi, and that she adoped the black baby AFTER the break up, to deflect charges of racism, were a little scary. I wonder if she ever reads this stuff and what the hell she thinks, if she does.