IUC Heads UP: Bullock Blockbuster Coming Soon…I’m Finalizing IT Now

Posted on April 28th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

SandraBullockSexyBlackPhotoshoot500-1024
****I will post first thing in the morning, I’m still waiting on one more source****

  1. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 28th, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    I knew you’d grow balls back Ian! Don’t fall for People sheeple.

    Reply
  2. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 28th, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    I guess if Bullock can hide a black baby for 3 months so can Brad Pitt. OH!

    Reply
  3. What? said on April 28th, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    Isn’t it funny that it gets revealed that Jesse has been having affairs and is into Nazi themed sex acts and now Bullock conveniently reveals she’s been hiding a black baby for 3 months (which I guess offsets any claims she maybe racist and into nazism) and is going to divorce him and be a single mother. It all feels too convenient, like it was planned all along.

    Reply
  4. Gail said on April 28th, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    Ian, I hope you won’t let Bullock get away with this ‘SUDDEN ADOPTION’. In my opinion, she saw her carrer going down the tubes after the things you posted about her and that James character. No way did she not know that guy was a Nazi. That horrible garbage was all around him! And her comments to People magazine about a year ago tells me she’s the same way! What better way to try and turn the tide that was headed for her than to adopt a black child? Keep up the great work!

    Reply
  5. What? said on April 28th, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    Gail, what comments did Bullock make a year ago?

    Reply
  6. babyjane said on April 28th, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    My Gosh, a Bullock Blockbuster coming later today. The suspense is incredible. Let’s see: what did Star magazine reveal two weeks ago that may be recycled into Ian’s latest “World Exclusive Shock Horror Bombshell”? That Sandra’s suffered hammer toe since she was a kid?

    Reply
  7. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 28th, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    Yeah,what did she say in Sheeple Magazine?

    Reply
  8. Geez Louise said on April 28th, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    You people are all insane. i am sure there are a dozen other things SB could have done to distance herself from the Nazi crap. Adopting a child that you will have for the rest of your life is not something you do to divert attention. SB’s adoption took 4 years you morons. She just didn’t pick him up at the grocery store. Whatever “bombshell” Ian has is probably as reliable as his sudanese model story, Angie screws dogs story and Sandy likes to have poop smeared in her face story. Ian has no moral compass and his sources are questionable at best….

    Reply
  9. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 28th, 2010 at 6:50 pm

    @Geez Louise:

    Angelina adopted a child three times as deflection from bad press and had three others biologically (or at least someone did) for pretty much the same reason – why couldn’t Sandra? By the way it is not the adoption itself that is suss to me, it is the timing of the anouncement and how it had been screamed from the cover of that celebrity PR missive People Magazine. SB has been known to keep her private life private up until now and not sell stories on her family relationships – why the sudden about-turn? Also if you think SB only found out about all those women and JJ’s proclivities a few months ago I think you are being incredibly naive. I think the Bombshell McGee character has been shopping that story around to the tabs for years now, in which case SB would most definitely have known about it. I think a few months ago was just the time when she could no longer stop it coming out. And those years have given her advisors a bit of a head start on getting the PR stratgey to counter it all in place I reckon, including arranging something as time-consuming as an adoption. JMO

    Reply
  10. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 28th, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    It doesn’t take FOUR years to get a black kid unless it happens to poops golden bricks. Now I’m convinced the Sudanese kid exists. And remember Sheeple Mag lies for Fangie about her corrupt adoptions as well. Why not Bullocks. Don’t forget Madge bought Mercy with her millions as well.

    Reply
  11. blu said on April 28th, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    @Geez Louise: Everything is a conspiracy unless it comes from the mouth of uber righteous Ian. It’s a enough to drive you ready Lainey gossip. Speaking of which……

    Reply
  12. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 28th, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    Yeah and I bet Julia Roberts is pissed too. She just happens to break the story the week Julia’s gonna be on the cover.

    Reply
  13. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 28th, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    My favorite lie- It was Sunny that encouraged Sandra to adopt a baby from N’Orleans. Yeah 5 year old Sunny telling her FOUR years ago to adopt. Garbage.

    Reply
  14. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 28th, 2010 at 7:15 pm

    Another great lie – No one saw her take the baby to the doctor because they treated it like a covert C.I.A. operation. Yeah I bet. This just keeps getting better and better.

    Reply
  15. JayDee said on April 28th, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    Something smells fishy in Denmark…
    …not only a black baby, but they had a bris? What a -hilarious- detail.
    I’m not buying it.

    Reply
  16. Geez Louise said on April 28th, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    @KramerVs.Kramer:

    Yes it can, IF you do it legally and don’t “require” special favors

    Reply
  17. Geez Louise said on April 28th, 2010 at 8:04 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I get what you are saying but what would have been an acceptable time frame for you? I think she is in a damned if you do damned if you don’t senario.

    Reply
  18. veterinary technician said on April 29th, 2010 at 12:04 am

    found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later

    Reply
  19. Wolfette said on April 29th, 2010 at 3:46 am

    Get over it people she has had this baby since Jan you just want to believe the worst of her.she is divorcing JJ and she is moving on with her life and her baby.Seems some are just mad cause they could never get an interveiw with her,But it will be amusing to see how Ian spins this.And quite frankly at this point People Magizine has more cred than Ian will ever have,wonder why we have not heard anything more on the sex tapes?cause there were none of her.and she was hiding the child from the poerazzi so a bris is the way to go.its vdone in your own home.all the news outlets have checked this out she has had the child since Jan get over it Bullock haters!

    Reply
  20. Wolfette said on April 29th, 2010 at 3:54 am

    @Geez Louise:
    I agree Ian ’s sources is usually the bakers daughters friend who has a guy that knows a gardner that works for the person in his crosshairs,total crap,he is not credible.I mean can you actually see anyone telling him the stuff he has been spinning in here,wonder how much money he paid for the crap!! no self respecting assistant or hair dresser or make up artist is going to devulge this kinda dirt if they wanna keep working for the star,s and no real freind is going to risk losing being a part of the entourage.

    Reply
  21. Boot Goot said on April 29th, 2010 at 5:34 am

    I guess it is a pretty nasty world. People are willing to adopt THREE multi racial children and spend years working as UN ambassadors just to present a good face to the public, which they try to isolate themselves from, as much as possible. And someone will adopt a black child (out of thin air) and spend her life raising it, because her husband (whom she is divorcing) is accused of racism. I am so shallow that I miss a lot of these things. I didn’t bother to delve, so I actually imagined that maybe Sandra Bulloch adopted her baby because she wanted his companionship through life. Like the old fashioned idea of a family. And I didn’t realize that she was divorcing her husband in order to cover her own nazism. I thought maybe she was a human being, capable of love, and that her heart was broken, so she undid the marriage. I don’t know why I’m like this. I think it has to do with growing up in a family where people loved each other, and no one placed the absolute most extraordinary negative interpretation on everything and attributed the lowliest possible motivation to others. Hopefully there is still a chance for me to be like some of you more healthy, seeing people.

    Reply
  22. Boot Goot said on April 29th, 2010 at 5:41 am

    Hey Ian, do you have the shit-eating tapes of Sandra Bulloch, yet? I’m waiting with bated breath. And, I REALLY want to see all those tapes of Jesse James dressed up, doing nazi things. What’s the hold up?

    Reply
  23. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 29th, 2010 at 7:20 am

    @ Goot Boot – yep, you sound like you had one really great family growing up!

    Reply
  24. inOttawa said on April 29th, 2010 at 7:22 am

    K v K — I think this is the best post on this thread – good one!! @KramerVs.Kramer:

    Reply
  25. jan/sa said on April 29th, 2010 at 8:02 am

    boot goot. yes it is a nasty world and yes i believe jolie and goastboy are adopting and popping out kids to destract from their adultery and then they have so many nannies to look after the kids it is pathetic, because if you desire to have kids surely you would take more time away from the camera as they are rich enought to make 1 film in 3 years and still live a decent and good life. they cart these poor innocent kids all over the world and give them no stable life that is not parenting but pr. they have sold their kids to the public and now complain that people talk and speculate about the kids but if they had kept their lives private and not sold their kids photos and private lives and call the paps every day they would at least have been able to complain about the specutalion that is taking place. they sold themselves and their kids for the mighty dollar so the should stfu or just disappear altogether. they are fame ho’s and nothing anybody tries to spin will make it untrue. jmo

    Reply
  26. Emerson said on April 29th, 2010 at 9:20 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    what does a great family growing up have to do with Goot Boot’s comment? I’m not being a bitch, just curious. You know I’m one of your biggest fans Keane and while I disagree with some of your comments, I respect them because they are usually written in an intelligent manner…..

    Reply
  27. purdy said on April 29th, 2010 at 9:23 am

    Well, it’s “first thing in the morning” now. I guess it depends on what one’s definition of what “first thing in the morning” is….

    Reply
  28. Emerson said on April 29th, 2010 at 9:33 am

    It was said last night that Life & Style was breaking the Sandra story and so she came out with it first…it could be true, it could be not true, but the Hollywood spin machine has always been in existence since the start of time (joke everyone) and I am not surprised by the story and the timing, and if you look back in the past several years since Hurricane Katrina, Sandra has donated money, rebuilt a school and bought a house in New Orleans, so why is this so difficult for people to accept?

    Reply
  29. Warhammer said on April 29th, 2010 at 6:00 pm

    Спасибо! Очень полезная инфа.

    Reply
  30. Boot Goot said on April 30th, 2010 at 1:13 am

    By the way, ian… I like that pic of Sandra Bulloch. (I don’t think its very fun to be Jesse James, right now.)

    Reply
  31. Кальян said on April 30th, 2010 at 2:34 am

    что касается темы, то мне кажется актуальность будет известна только через некоторое время.

    Reply
  32. Wolfette said on April 30th, 2010 at 4:04 am

    @Boot Goot:
    LOL!! your right Boot Goot the man has to be kicking his own ass repeatedly over losing her.sucks to be him right now I bet.You ever wonder if the bottom feeding media had stayed out of it they might have tried to work things out?I mean its looking more and more like alot of Bullshit was reported,how much of a percentage should the gossip hounds take for their divorce I mean I know its JJ’s fault what he did,and the womans fault as well but did media play a part in this as well?

    Reply
  33. Emerson said on April 30th, 2010 at 9:03 am

    @Wolfette:
    I will never in my life understand why “entertainment media” give these whores the celebrity status they always do…ignore them, and then maybe someday they will go away and quit having affairs with celebrities just to get onto radaronline et al., and yes how naive of a comment was that?? lol

    Reply
  34. Boot Goot said on April 30th, 2010 at 11:38 pm

    I can’t stand seeing them get away with it, but then, here I am, on the absolute lowest of the low, the very one that reported that Jesse had a shotgun during excrement-smeared sex with Sandra, the worst blog I have ever come across. But I do like the reader’s comments. I feel bad that Jesse and Sandra never had a chance to find their own balance in this thing. There must be more to him than what has been reported, or she wouldn’t have loved him so much. I would absolutely not want that end of someone’s business. It would have been really hard to get past the unprotected sex with that particular set of women, but, for some reason, I did not think Jesse was beyond redemption. Call me naive, but I think he really loved her. Alas. Shot in the foot with his own gun.

    Reply
  35. Wolfette said on May 1st, 2010 at 4:43 am

    @Boot Goot:
    yeah he may have shot off his own foot so to speak but there are couples that have came back from far worse,I mean right now most the trash out there about JJ has not been proven yet,I mean the girls yeah and I,m even starting to suspect two of those women,but the rest no,I,m holding out hope that JJ will find his own footing,seems even he deserves redemption so on this we agree.

    Reply
  36. Wolfette said on May 1st, 2010 at 4:51 am

    @Emerson:
    LOL!! its not niave hun just wishful,thing is if a woman would take the time to really understand a man she would know that while some can actually stay faithful others have problems high sex drives what ever it is,I just wish the man would take a harder look at himself most of these men know they cannot stay faithful so why marry? I mean find a woman thats into open relationships and be done with it.why marry and know in your heart your going to hurt the girl.sometimes I think guys have an oppisite defect you know women love bad boyz maybe some men have a thing for good girls.

    Reply
  37. Boot Goot said on May 1st, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    Emerson: its called denial. You THINK you will be able to pull off monagomy, this time. I agree, some guys just don’t have it in them to stay “faithful” to one woman (that goes for some women, too). That doesn’t mean they are evil. He effed up big time. He knows it! But its too late, baby. Maybe next time….

    Reply
  38. Pharmacy technician certification board said on May 11th, 2010 at 2:54 am

    What a great resource!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2010
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Meta