IUC Exclusive: Did Lindsay Steal 35k Rolex????

Posted on April 24th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

lilo09Her lawyer denies it but clearly she is prime suspect. My source close to Lindsay says she’s “capable of anything. She’s become delusional, thinking she can get away with anything. I don’t think she’s learned her lesson yet.” Businessman Mark Unger recenty met Lohan at a party in downtown L.A. and was shocked by her appearance. “She looks skeletal, her cheek bones are sunk in,” Unger said. “I wonder how much longer she has if she doesn’t get proper help.” (TMZ) Developing…

  1. lory said on April 24th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    It`s a good idea that you posted a TMZ link – because this story shure as hell is not an exclusive. And L.Lohan looks anything but skeletal. Take a look for yourself, she never looked better:
    http://ll-media.tmz.com/2010/04/23/0423-lilo-ginsburg-credit.jpg

    Reply
  2. mooki said on April 24th, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    She’s sure as hell delusional… with two nutjob parents, an ex-con father and a a drug dealer/ex stripper stage mother

    btw, with all the news about Polanski’s in abstentia, here’s a transcript of Samantha Geimer, the victim, on Larry King back in ‘03. After reading this, I feel even more bad for Polanski to deal with this woman and her sicko mother:
    http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0302/24/lkl.00.html

    Reply
  3. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 24th, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    Can you see any parallels to be drawn with this story Ian?

    Just a suggestion.

    Reply
  4. crouching tiger said on April 24th, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    Lindsay Lohan is done. I don’t know why she’s still relevant.
    Btw, Keanne, you haven’t give us a link to Brangelina red carpet Inglourious Basterd video, the one you talked about? I really wanna see it. Please give s a link.

    Reply
  5. Kate said on April 24th, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    Ian, I am going to post this here, and not on the Jen thread because this is the most recent one. I really do not know what is going on with you, but since we have supported you with diligence for well over a year and got the freaking hell beat out of us most of the time for doing that, (Keane, myself, and Patty) it would be really really nice if you would have the decency to at least respond ..somewhere.

    Whoever is advising you PR wise, if you have not figured it out by now, you need to dump them. If no one is, you need to take a good look at all of this that all transpired in the last month. How how you managed to fruck this up so much? You have written some good books, done very well for yourself, and now this?

    There are just too many topics I could hit on, one being that you are sounding like a misogynist. That is not the man I have come to know. Where the hell is that coming from? Seriously? All this locker room talk that is spilling out , that is not who you have been. Is that just from, “be careful who your friends are, they don’t become who you are, you become who they are?” Have to ask. I know you think highly of HS, O&A, and in private they may be very nice people, but is that what you want to be know for? How do to think you connect that image with that of being a serious author? You can not.

    You know when you were doing your MJ book tours I ran across an article where the author wondered if the network had told you to “dress down for their station”. because you were wearing a nice suit, no glasses, etc. I saw that interview. You looked great. I won’t mention the network, but I suspect they did, because after that it was back to your MO. Now I get that Ian for chats on IUC live ,etc, for maybe trying to use that as a niche like Perez did his pink suit. They made fun of you on this last show for the way you were dressed. You said you were showing respect for your Canadian friends. Ian has it occurred to you than as you get better know, and more successful, and older, that maybe it is time to put forth a new image, a more successful one. Janice Dickenson helped you with head shots and that got you parts for your book before. I bet those were good. I know this started out as a joke and it stuck, but it seems to be hurting now more than helping you, just my opinion.

    I have to agree with Keane, on her comment, and I will take that further. When you wrote up that source on the Jen story, did it not occur to you that no real friend would talk about anyone like that, much less her? If that same story had been recounted about you, coming from a so called friend, say Max, would you consider that person a friend? I bet not. I am sure you read the story in the New York Post, it was hateful, and hmmm kind of interesting to me, it was as off as the one written by someone for the national paper on your book Brangelina, the one I used as a rebuttal for my review of it. It was ridiculous. Clearly they did not really read your book. When I read it I laughed and thought, what an idiot reporter. That is what inspired me to write the review so readers would know what was really in your book. That person did you a great disservice, just as the NYP did Jen and her films, and you did by repeating and perpetuating something you clearly gave no thought to. Here is a article from someone who did :

    Jennifer Aged Out?

    Jennifer Aniston is ‘aged out,’ says critic: You’ve got to be kidding
    by Kate Ward
    The Bounty Hunter wasn’t great. Her 2009 film, Love Happens, bombed. And she recently wore this dress. But still, I feel as though I have to defend everyone’s favorite Friend, Jennifer Aniston, especially after reading this quote from an . critic in this New York Post article: “Aniston just can’t play the good friend anymore. She’s aged out, no matter the yoga and the highlights. She just can’t do America’s sweetheart next door. She needs a big wake-up call.”

    First of all, ouch. Secondly, I’ll agree with this critic on one point: I’ve been rooting for Aniston to ditch her “good friend” cap and prove her acting chops, like she did back in 2002 when she starred in The Good Girl. (Our film critic Lisa Schwarzbaum also recently pushed for Aniston to have a breakthrough moment.) And true, she might have a tough time doing so if the only role she accepts is the romantic comedy lead. But to blame her recent lack of box office success on her being “aged-out?” You’ve got to be kidding me! (As for the dig on her dating life — “Her taste in men, it’s totally off. John Mayer? Gerard Butler? She’s missing a common-sense gene.” – that has nothing to do with her professional life, so let’s not judge, okay?)

    As we’ve seen recently with Meryl Streep (It’s Complicated) and Helen Mirren (The Last Station), it’s entirely possible to attract audiences and critical praise playing an older romantic lead. (Yes, they’re on a different playing field than Aniston, but would anyone call them “aged-out”?) But the fact that Aniston is over 30 is hardly the issue. Instead of attacking her age, critics should spend more time pointing to the real problem: Aniston has been unwilling to step outside her comfort zone. And I would guess that after all this time, audiences are just a tad more unwilling to watch Aniston play indistinguishable roles. It’s like the old saying goes: “Once you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.”

    Yet, as upsetting as it is to me to read such a quote, I have to say I saw it coming. After all, this is the path that much of the media carved for her way back when Brad left her for Angie: Jen’s the poor lil’ single girl who can’t get a man, doesn’t have children, and can’t get the same critical praise “the other woman” snags. But let’s not feel too bad for poor lil’ Jen: People seem to forget that two of her recent films, He’s Just Not That Into You and Marley & Me, were hits. And I’m optimistic about her future — Aniston looks like she’s trying something different with the upcoming The Goree Girls, a musical about prison performers. Aged-out? Pshaw. I just can’t wait for Jen to prove ‘em wrong.

    http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/04/01/jenni … n-defense/

    Now , I realize this is a very long post, but I am trying to make a point. You and the source, (don’t say you were just the messenger because you interjected your thoughts into that post) stated basically she is a flop, single , washed up, poor Jen. In you book you said you admired Angie because she is one of the few actresses to be around as long as she has. okayy..now Ian, did you bother to look at her numbers, over half of her films have failed. Jen’s make money, and they continue to be the most purchased films. Jennifer is financially more sound that Angelina is, ask anyone and they will verify that. The very fact that studios want Angie to basically shine her humanitarian halo (fake as it has become) on their slimy shitty lifestyles should tell you something.

    Last, why did you really leave out Thom Racina? You could have really told all in this book Ian, that was already on record on the internet, TR has put it on tape, in print, everywhere that Brad lived with him. There could have been no lawsuit. It is a fact he was his houseboy. Thom has talked extensively on the radio about Brad jumping into his arms heartbroken and when excited for a part, putting his head on his shoulder, and more, but you left out the one person who truly gave Brad Pitt his start in Hollywood. Why?

    All the info you told us over the last year, Angelina involved in a crime, for one, sex tape, etc, I could go on, even if you could not put it in the book, you could have followed up on this blog, but you did not. Nothing ever got finished, and that is also part of why people are upset…you have all of this at your finger tips Ian..so what happened?

    Will we get an answer, or will you ignore us again like you did for months at a time. If you , it will be the last time I post on this blog. I would like to give this another chance, but not blindly.

    Peace friend,
    Kate

    PS if there are typos..oh well.

    Reply
  6. Tinkuy said on April 24th, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    Hey, Ian, you’re slower than molasses!

    Reply
  7. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 24th, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    @crouching tiger:

    Just google Brangelina at the Inglorious Basterds premiere – I’m sure you will find it. It was when they were posing for pics for the paps.

    Reply
  8. lory said on April 24th, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @Kate:

    So you want Ian to trash Jolie again because she derserves it in your mind for being what- a mass murderer a rapist – my fault even those kind of people could sue him and rightfully though – if he published similar insane stories about them. Hell even a suspect that clear as day is guilty must be called an “alleged criminal” in the newspapers before he/she is convicted.
    Now you are mad at Ian because he wrote some not so nice things about your favourite actress but it is okay if he accuses Jolie of sleeping with a dog and her own children because you despise her?
    I tell you what: it is not okay to initiate a smear campaign by coming up with the grossest claims imaginable – no matter wether the person you are targeting is Jolie, Jen or even a war criminal. THIS IS JUST WRONG and has NOTHING to do with gossip!!!! So either you have standards when calling yourself a journalist or you have none but that should apply to everyone wether you like this person or not.

    Reply
  9. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 24th, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    @lory:

    Mia you are totally missing the point here – as usual your understanding of what is going on in any given situation is so wide-of-the-mark and simplistic is it utterly jaw-dropping. This is a conversation between Ian and his former supporters. You are interjecting yourself in a situation in which even if you understood it, you would have no place getting involved. We know you don’t like Ian, that is not the issue at stake here. And frankly, the issue that is at stake, is genuinely none of your business. Now please back off and go and play with the traffic for a while while the grown-ups have a conversation. Your full co-operation in this matter is greatly appreciated, thanks.

    Reply
  10. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 24th, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    Ok so things that are definitely not cool with me are as follows:

    1) Speculating on very, very serious subject matters for which there is no foundation whatsoever and playing people who trusted that there was some foundation for such stories for fools.

    2) Telling outright lies about very serious subjects which lead your readers to seriously worry about either yourself or someone who you supposedly know. So not cool, at all.

    3) F*cking someone else over to save one’s own skin.

    I am so disappointed.

    Reply
  11. Kerching said on April 24th, 2010 at 6:50 pm

    Wow! Finally the pitbull has woken up and smelt the coffee. Well done ian. You’ve done what others have tried and failed many times before. Big kisses.

    Reply
  12. HisHighness said on April 24th, 2010 at 7:23 pm

    @Kate:
    With all due respect K&K, I stand by all stories I post here. Yes, I do have very good sources in Jen’s camp. They don’t go on record because they want to avoid controversy with her. And they want to remain friends. The stories they feed me, however, are important to get out. They know and trust me and that is why they come to me. I would never betray a source.
    I value your contributions to this blog and have always acknowledged it at any opportunity I have. Thank you.
    peace out,
    ian

    Reply
  13. Mili said on April 24th, 2010 at 7:50 pm

    Jane Pitt Supports an Angie & Brad Wedding

    http://www.okmagazine.com/2010/04/ok-exclusive-jane-pitt-supports-an-angie-brad-wedding/

    Ian: What kind of sources do you have? Your worst enemies?

    Reply
  14. BeenThereDoneThat said on April 24th, 2010 at 7:58 pm

    Kate, you have always been so respectful and even though I wanted to discuss posts many times and would have liked to jump in, I never did because I knew sooner or later Keane would get nasty with me. Like in the post above. So, since this is “a conversation between Ian and his supporters”, I guess I better get out of here–but I’m going to stop short of actually “playing in traffic”.

    Reply
  15. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 24th, 2010 at 8:08 pm

    @BeenThereDoneThat:

    Keep quoting me baby and stirring the pot. Or why not just stay out of a conversation that does not involve you at all, just like you suggested you should do. This is a personal discussion, thank you very much.

    Reply
  16. Terri D said on April 24th, 2010 at 8:09 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Excuse me? “A conversation between Ian and his former supporters?” If you want to have a private conversation you talk to someone in person, on the telephone or through email. Posting on a blog that is open for the entire world and anyone with a computer is not what one would call a private conversation of any type.

    Ian has more readers than it is apparent by the folks who post. Most of Ian’s readers don’t like the disrespect that you and your companions attack others who have differing opinions show on a daily basis. As one thread on a blog referred to you all as “the nest of pit vipers” over at IUC.

    You have taken this blog and made it your own personal dumping ground on people you don’t or do like.

    It is actually IAN’S blog. I think if someone posts something, then it doesn’t fall under a conversation between Ian and his former supporters. It falls under freedom of speech–anyone can comment. Many of us don’t agree with Ian on topics that bash the Jolie Pitts and others. We’d like to see more facts rather than supposition. But, if we jump in and politely state our opinions, we are bashed for not following the party line.

    Just my opinion. And I’m sure many others who don’t want to deal with the wrath of Keane agree.

    Reply
  17. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 24th, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    @HisHighness:

    How can you possibly stand by them though Ian? You posted one story last year about Angelina Jolie definitely not being pregnant then another one straight after it saying she was pregnant and then yet another switching back to the original story again – they could not all have been true! And can’t you see how biased these “sources” are from the tone of their language and how their stories are being fed to you for a deliberate purpose which is not necessarily to tell the gospel truth? Honestly, can’t you see that? Because it is screamingly obvious to me and most people reading here. You know these people will play any game to save their careers, they will say black is white and night is day if necessary. The moment you perceive that a particular story might benefit a particular celeb in a certain way then you need to be seriously and rigorously questioning the reliability of that source and what their bias could possibly be. I’m sorry Ian but you are coming across as incredibly naive here and whether you will admit it or not you have made mistakes with your stories in the past and it is still happening. If you have made a mistake then the best thing to do would be to hold your hands up and admit it, not obstinately stand by it when we all already know it is not true. If you don’t then your credibility will be absolutely zero; even I don’t believe what you are saying more for God’s sake – do you realise how this will look to everyone else? I am telling you now Ian this is not the way to play it, both from an ethical standpoint and a commercial one. It will all crumble down around you. Clean this mess up for goodness sake, take a breather and start over. It is the only choice left to you here.

    Night all.

    Reply
  18. Leah said on April 24th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    Ian-sorry but I still don’t buy it. Jennifer and Gerard are both on record as saying they were just friends that enjoyed working together. They said they were not romantically involved in any way.I believe them.I am sorry that you are being played by this so called Jennifer friend. Jennifer has some very loyal real friends that she has had for over twenty five years.They would never talk about her on or off the record. I hate that you are being disrespectful about Jennifer.But then you have printed a few stories about her that were seen the same way.You mentioned a source that knew all three(never naming that person). I thought it was BS then and I still do now.

    What upset me was that you copied what was said by some critic in NY that didn’t even have the guts/balls to sign his name.Please do some research.TBH is well over 113 million now.It costs 40 million to make.Sony is pleased with their numbers.It still has not finished it’s international run or it’s run here either.The studio expects it to make well over 125-130 million.Why you and your source insists it’s a flop is beyond me. Check out you “idols” box office numbers and report them truthfully.Jennifer’s movies make money.Also they are huge DVD sales.

    I am disappointed that you believe your source is a true friend of Jennifer’s. I hope for her sake if it is someone she is mildly associated with she drops this bitch .This is no friend. A lot of us think James and Jolie are your sources.And for saying you/they think this story needs to be out there.That is BS.What purpose did it serve? None-not a damn thing.You made the JoliePitts out to be saints again.That in itself is a riot and sends a clear message to your readers on here.

    Also you say you stand by your stories and sources. Interesting since you never really fully develop a story.The Sandra Bullock stuff was disgusting . You say developing…..but never return to it.

    Reply
  19. Kate said on April 24th, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Ian, let me remind you,that in your book you stated by that you were played by one of those very good sources of Jens. Do you remember that? You bought into the fact that they told you, hook, line, and sinker that Jen had met up with Brad and forgiven him, and you had come to realize that was not true. How can you stand by a source in her camp that has played you on that? I ask you again, if that person said the same thing about you, if it were Max , would that not be a red flag to you? Would you not suddenly say to yourself, wait a minute, something is off here..this person is claiming to be Ian’s friend, but yet they are talking smack about him..just how good a friend are there..and what exactly is the reason this would need to get out? Explain that? For what does it serve? You know what, the producers allegedly leaked pictures of Brad and Jolie on the set behaving in a way that should not have been, to promote that movie, that is not uncommon. What has that got to do with Jen? Poor Jen? what is that? She is worth 150 million dollars, your buddy Noah (or is he still) is selling that she and Brad are back together on the down low. I have no idea if that is true. Imagine if that turns out to be true. All these solid sources are suddenly going to be very crystal clear in their motives , aren’t they? Angelina is not the only one that knows how to play the deflection game.

    What about the source that told you Jen was gay, you stood by that source for how long, I don’t know, but the next time we asked in a chat, you said no, Jen is not gay. Do you really realize that at this point no one knows exactly which sources you stand by, and which ones you do not. That is really what it gets down to, because your sources are your credibility. What do we do, throw it all out, and start over, assume they are all true, even the ones you found out lied, or assume that they are all lying and only trust the ones from here on out?

    This is not about you valuing our contributions to the blog Ian, it is about valuing friendship . I think you know that. I thought it was down right dirty for Dawn to publicly call you a liar, and I stood up for you on that, but you just sit back and act like nothing is going on for cripes sake, you never even bother to respond to that accusation. Do you understand how damaging that was?

    You answer back simply you stand by all your sources, but I have just given you examples where you did not, and there were others. You can not get pissed off at me or Keane for calling this out. It is only fair. You know good and well some of your sources are lying. I am not saying you are making anything up (that is what Dawn Olsen said) I am saying you are being played by some of your sources.

    Do we have to go back and list every single story for the last year, point out the contradictions and where the source was you said was solid, only to have it later turn out not to be true?

    So what exactly was the reason that this Jen story needed to get out, what was the importance of it, besides painting Jen in a bad light?

    If you are honest with yourself, you will understand what I am saying. You did not answer any of the other questions either, Thom Racina was a big one for many people. You had a golden opportunity.

    Sorry Ian, I like you, but this just does not fly. It was a pointless story, and only aimed at hurting her bottom line. A friend , a true friend would not feel the need to get that out , any more than your true friend would feel the need to get info out like that about your work.

    peace, Kate

    Reply
  20. Kate said on April 24th, 2010 at 9:29 pm

    @lory:
    You are misunderstanding my post. No I am not mad at Ian, disappointed in him yes. I don’t want him to print stories about others that I don’t like if they are not true, if the sources are not solid. That is the whole point of the conversation. FTR Jen is not my favorite actress, I have other reasons I follow her career that are personal, I don’t hate Angelina. and at times do have compassion for her, probably more than any regular on her. I am however,not blind to what is stated pretty much as fact about her by not just her circle of friends in the past by her past lovers, and long before I ever saw a message board. She is messed up, too bad she never got help instead of whitewashing her problems with the UN. That said, I have less sympathy for her than someone who has led a more private life. Still , of course I would hope that the posts Ian makes are made on solid sources, not a flimsy rumor. Unfortunately AJ has brought much of it on herself. I bet if you were to have walked the streets if LA 10 years ago, met some of the people she hung with, you would not have found some of the things Ian posted so shocking. Does it make it right if they were not properly sourced, no, at the time I believed they were.

    Here is the problem. Ian is a target. AJ would like nothing better than to take him down, as would the MJ camp, and most likely Courtney Love. I could name others. I don’t find it much of a stretch that people in their camps would not set up bad sources and feed Ian info that is not true just to do that. I can only imagine right now Angelina is reveling in what is going on with Ian right now. He has had people try to convince him certain political members of parties were gay. Why do that? Well so he will post it and look like a fool and maybe even get sued. So while I believe that Ian believes his sources, I am not so sure he has not been played more than one time.

    Kimmy and Toni for starters. How bout that? Does that help you understand how I see this?

    Reply
  21. Kate said on April 24th, 2010 at 9:32 pm

    @BeenThereDoneThat:
    BTDT no, that would not happen, Lory and Keane have a ongoing thing. Long history there. I am always open to discussing an opposing view at any time. Don’t let that stop you.

    Reply
  22. Keane Fan said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:33 am

    …checking it back again…sorry to see this site going down fast…Keane love, before you bow out of here please let us know, your faithfull followers, where you’ll be taking Internet residence…or better still, can you open your own blog? You’ll be the Queen of the Castle and entitled to apply your gentle corrections to the unfaithfull as you will see fit…we don’t care about the subject matter, brangelina, jen, global warming, I’m sure you are equaly and extremelly competent in any…

    Reply
  23. lory said on April 25th, 2010 at 5:31 am

    @Kate:

    Wow. Am I supposed to believe that? You used to hang out with Jolie`s former friends in hollywood? Which friends were that again? We know what we know about Jolie because SHE TOLD us! No need for investigatory gossip. By the way your example that Jen`s friends would never tell anything negative about her is true for anybody`s true friends isn`t it – even Jolie`s friends! THAT was what I was talking about. Don`t let your personal favour get in the way of your rational mind. Don`t judge different people with different meassures just because you like one but not the other.

    Reply
  24. moo said on April 25th, 2010 at 7:06 am

    Hi everyone not posted in about a year but I have been lurking. The only reason I question Ian’s source is not because it is an anti Jen post but because of the last sentence ‘Poor Jen, she just can’t find the right man’ it is the Loon’s mantra. I don’t think a genuine friend would have said it.

    Reply
  25. inOttawa said on April 25th, 2010 at 7:24 am

    @Terri D:

    My thoughts exactly. A private conversation on a blog? Stay out of it? Funny.

    Reply
  26. Mili said on April 25th, 2010 at 8:26 am

    @Terri D:

    Totally Right!!!.

    Reply
  27. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 9:24 am

    Hey ladies

    Thanks for your comments. I am having this conversation here with Ian because if I e-mail him privately he probably won’t respond. Kate and I have supported him for such a long time on this blog (to the point where he acknowledged us in his Brangelina book) and through thick and thin that he has perhaps come to expect that we always will. In one of his previous posts he said that he needed all our support – I believe that comment was made in response to something I’d said – which is why I needed to come here to explain that he won’t get that and why. I don’t agree with what Ian is doing now, I think it is as bad as the behaviour of Angelina, so of course I do not support him as I would not support her. The reasons for why I no longer support him are not apparent to people posting here who I am not friends with because I am not explicitly stating them. I have referred to some of the issues in my posts on this thread yes but not all of them by a very long way. Some of them are things which have gone on in relation to this blog a while ago, and others involve things that have been said in personal conversations between Ian and myself. So I am posting this here to make it clear that while Ian has always had my support before he will not have it now unless he seriously starts to re-think this and make amends. I just need to make that clear so people know I am not condoning what is going on here now and do not agree with what Ian is doing at this point at all. That is why this conversation is not about what you think, or what the crackpots at FF think or how you feel you were not allowed to give your opinions on the stories here because I would have been a big old meanie to you etc blah blah blah, it’s just a conversation between Ian and myself and the people who expect me to continue supporting him regardless of what is being said or done. Just wanted to say that is not the case unless something changes in a pretty major way, so as far as the blog goes you are really welcome to it.

    Reply
  28. HisHighness said on April 25th, 2010 at 10:06 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    I maintain that anything posted I stand by. I do understand and respect your concerns K&K. I have multiple sources in Jen A’s camp. That’s one of the things that might be confusing everyone. Another is that even though both Jen Aniston and Gerard Butler told the media they were only friends Jen’s camp insists she thought they were a couple, much contrary to what Butler thought. Most of the comments by people with an axe to grind with me Kate refers that bash me to I don’t respond to because they are not worthy of a response. As for Dawn Olsen’s comments I have no idea why she’d make comments like that. I was very hurt. Peace out, I’m spending the day doing what I do best – being a dad.

    Reply
  29. mooki said on April 25th, 2010 at 10:08 am

    Tom Cruise sex tape confirmed:
    http://celebs.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978195767

    Reply
  30. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 10:18 am

    @ Ian – that sounds like a good plan Ian, have a great day.

    @ Keane Fan – if I do will you link to it from yours?

    Reply
  31. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 10:23 am

    @ mooki – who is he sleeping with in it – a higher operating thetan?

    Reply
  32. bullsh#t said on April 25th, 2010 at 10:36 am

    By the way if jen thought that they were a couple why was butler kissing a girl on the street before the mexico get a way, why was he in brazil whoring around etc. etc. etc. but jen thought they were a couple

    LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO hahahahahha

    Reply
  33. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    What’s with the constant defense of Aniston? She sucks. Pattyanne obviously has a big lezzie crush on her. Talk about obsessed. Everyone knew what Jennifer Lesbian was up to,she does it constantly.All of her relationship are fake.She’s pathetic.Been five years and six kids later. Get the f-ck over it.

    Reply
  34. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:17 pm

    Oops sorry Pattyanne looks like that long ass post was written by Kate.

    Reply
  35. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    Keane and Kate really need to stop the pontificating. Ian screwed up-hey shit happens. Don’t worry Ian you’ll redeem yourself when you find ORAMA’s birth certificate or maybe Al Capone’s vault,LOL.
    Besides anyone else notice Bullocks still hasn’t filed for divorce yet. Makes me think somebody’s getting paid to shut up!

    Reply
  36. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    And Ian you have to understand that if you have multiple sources all claiming to be a friend of Jen and they are saying conflicting things it is highly likely that at least one of them is lying. You know Angelina’s team plant negative stories about Jen, you talked about it in your book. And you know they watch this site like a hawk and comment on it all the time (that means you James Haven keyboard monkey), surely you understand that they are going to try to leak false stories to you too from people who claim to be a friend of Jen but quite obviously from the tone of their language, aren’t? And I think there is every likelihood that Jen’s team plant stories to throw you off track so she can keep her private life private too. “Jen wouldn’t touch Brad with six condoms on” – do you seriously believe that? She was married to the man for years and was clearly devastated at the break-up and doesn’t seem to have had one serious relationship since – do you honestly think that’s how she perceives him? And as for the “poor Jen” thing well that is a total misnoma. That woman has a mutli-million dollar HW career – if she is “poor Jen” then we may as well all throw ourselves off a cliff because not a single one of us is ever likely to have as successful a career as Jen’s! And the fact that a woman is still judged by the relative success or failure of her relationships with men just goes to show how far our society has to go in terms of achieving sexual equality between men and women.

    So in conclusion Ian I have to say that it is not enough to just take a source’s word for it and throw a story out there without making a judgement about how likely it is to be true or not. Whether you mean to or not you are leading people astray and playing into the hands of the people who are trying to play you. If you don’t start making a judgement on the stories you receive then you just aren’t going to have any credibility at all and no-one is going to read you any more. What would be the point when no-one can tell for sure when you’ve got a real story and when you haven’t? Please calm down a bit and take your time to think these stories through before you throw them out there, it will be more constructive towards your career in the long-run than what is going on now.

    I hope you have a great day with your daughter.

    Best

    K

    Reply
  37. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    Jennifer Aniston is full of shit. She only married Brad so she could be a A-list movie star. When she started becoming more successful than him,winning emmys and not even thanking him refusing to get pregnant because she didn’t want to ruin her body or career.So Brad said FU and started banging Angelina. And the fact that Aniston is still judged by the failure of her relationships is Aniston’s own fault. All she does is flaunt these fake ass relationships to promote herself. She loves being the victim.

    Reply
  38. I'm on the bidet said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Thanks so much for putting in my head visions of Scientological ritualistic gay sex initiations, which no doubt involve multiple robed and masked witnesses in a circular room lit solely by lava lamps, whilst music from Enya and/or John Tesh plays in the background. In the center of the room, a glistening, shivering, yet grinning Tommy Cruise struggles to his feet and takes a few steps, only to fall hard on his head after slipping in a puddle of lubricant. Titled ‘Cruise’s Ascension’, his fall plays in a constant loop on the tv in the Scientology coffee room.

    Reply
  39. repost said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    And Ian you have to understand that if you have multiple sources all claiming to be a friend of Jen and they are saying conflicting things it is highly likely that at least one of them is lying. You know Angelina’s team plant negative stories about Jen, you talked about it in your book. And you know they watch this site like a hawk and comment on it all the time (that means you James Haven keyboard monkey), surely you understand that they are going to try to leak false stories to you too from people who claim to be a friend of Jen but quite obviously from the tone of their language, aren’t? And I think there is every likelihood that Jen’s team plant stories to throw you off track so she can keep her private life private too. “Jen wouldn’t touch Brad with six condoms on” – do you seriously believe that? She was married to the man for years and was clearly devastated at the break-up and doesn’t seem to have had one serious relationship since – do you honestly think that’s how she perceives him? And as for the “poor Jen” thing well that is a total misnoma. That woman has a mutli-million dollar HW career – if she is “poor Jen” then we may as well all throw ourselves off a cliff because not a single one of us is ever likely to have as successful a career as Jen’s! And the fact that a woman is still judged by the relative success or failure of her relationships with men just goes to show how far our society has to go in terms of achieving sexual equality between men and women.

    So in conclusion Ian I have to say that it is not enough to just take a source’s word for it and throw a story out there without making a judgement about how likely it is to be true or not. Whether you mean to or not you are leading people astray and playing into the hands of the people who are trying to play you. If you don’t start making a judgement on the stories you receive then you just aren’t going to have any credibility at all and no-one is going to read you any more. What would be the point when no-one can tell for sure when you’ve got a real story and when you haven’t? Please calm down a bit and take your time to think these stories through before you throw them out there, it will be more constructive towards your career in the long-run than what is going on now.

    I hope you have a great day with your daughter.

    Best

    K

    Reply
  40. mooki said on April 25th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    http://www.celebitchy.com/98892/enquirer_toms_secret_life_gay_lies_exposed/

    Cruise and Tommy Davis on a sex tape??!!? this could be explosive…

    Reply
  41. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:00 pm

    Besides,as much as I hate Brangelina,Brad Pitt doesn’t owe Aniston anything. Angelina is the mother of his children-Not Aniston.His priority should be them not Aniston’s feelings. Sure Angie stole him,but once someone has six kids with other woman you should move on with your life really. Same goes for Aniston fans and Jolie fans. This shit has been analyzed for half a f-ing decade. Who gives a shit anymore?

    Reply
  42. Leah said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    KramerVs.Kramer sounds like you still do.

    Reply
  43. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    Same with Cruise 25 years of “He’s a fag.” Do I give a fuck?No.Who isn’t gay in H’wood? Who isn’t gay in America? If Tom was straight he wouldn’t be a star because everyone is obsessed with his homosexuality.Gay people and straight people are fixated on what this man does with his butthole. Kinda creepy if you ask me. I also think he loves the controversy and stirs the pot. I think behind closed doors TC is average looking middle-aged married white guy,with 3 kids,republican and judeo-christian leanings.

    Reply
  44. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    Leah how did I know you were gonna say that must be a Faniston.

    Reply
  45. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    Screw Aniston. I am proud to say I have never been a fan of hers. I really don’t get why people love her? Really what’s so great about her? Tell me.

    Reply
  46. Leah said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    Don’t especially like your term but I do enjoy Jennifer’s work and I do keep up with her charities and things going on in her life. I enjoy reading articles that come from her-not the trashoids. At least I have always been honest about liking her and her work…unlike some.

    Reply
  47. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:38 pm

    Why do you find her talented? I find her so annoying. She acts the same in every movie. I really can’t stand her. Brad Pitt as well.

    Reply
  48. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    Looks like Lohan got canned from another job. She’s been dropped from the Other Side.

    Reply
  49. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    That is exactly what I was picturing!

    Reply
  50. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    @KramerVs.Kramer:

    Jesus wept.

    Reply
  51. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    huh?

    Reply
  52. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    @lory:

    Mia the type of people Jen is friends with now and the type of people Angelina was friends with back then are slightly different kettles of fish love, exactly like those two women are. Let me give you an example: Angelina is friends with Marilyn Manson, Jennifer Aniston is not – catch my drift? Oh and surely by now you do know that Kate is acquainted with a few people in HW right? If not, Mia, seriously, go back to school! If you haven’t picked up on that yet you are in dire need of some more reading lessons!

    Reply
  53. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    @KramerVs.Kramer:

    Take your meds!

    Reply
  54. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    There are far too many K’s in this situation.

    Reply
  55. KramerVs.Kramer said on April 25th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    As long as it’s not KKK!

    Reply
  56. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @KramerVs.Kramer:

    Yeah, that’s exactly what I thought – you’re evening out the situation! Lol

    Reply
  57. Reality Check said on April 25th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    @lory:

    Hey, lady, didn’t you understand that this blog is not for you?

    Any idiot in your place would have figured out a long time ago that we don’t like Angelina Jolie because without the whole Brad Pitt thing, she would be a fucking nobody. We know it, she knows it, everybody knows it. She knew damned well that no amount of humanitarian work would ever put her on the map the way Brad Pitt could, so she set her sights on him without giving a flying fuck that he was married and her place wasn’t in his or his wife’s life.

    Oh, the marriage was on the rocks, you say? So it doesn’t matter that she had an affair with a man whose marriage was on its deathbed, is that what you mean? I have read this statement so many times on so many blogs over the last five years that I wonder if the people who say it really are sincere or it simply comes from under the fingertips of Angelina’s PR team, which overtime to maintain the version that no marriage can be destroyed if it wasn’t already dead!

    If the former is correct, then all I can say is that this woman has the power to attract the most immature, least well formed, least honest and least sympathetic part of the public – people in their teens, who have never been in a serious relationship with anybody and that’s why they don’t understand at all how a relationship can be all your life if you think you found the right person. And this is very sad because the people who admire and support her are the future!

    Your post is the typical statement of a little teenage whore who has a field day over the fact that finally, there is a public figure who broke a marriage but looks attractive enough, interesting enough, unusual enough and you-name-it enough to give courage and validation to countless little whores like you, who were afraid to come out before she burst on the scene on her home wrecking act.

    Nobody was really interested in Jolie before she broke Brad Pitt’s and Jennifer Aniston’s marriage. Nobody talked about her. Nobody took her seriously. Nobody gave a flying fuck about her, except, I guess, her pervert-looking brother (“the strongest and most amazing man I’ve ever known”). Her own father said publicly she needed serious psychiatric help and she herself admitted that her husband’s blood was the most beautiful thing in the world to her.

    She was the most repulsive thing ever and if you feel honoured by the chance to defend her just because she dropped a donation here and donation there, then your moral standards are below sea level – and your IQ, as well. Now go below sea level, where you belong, little whore, and stay there – the world doesn’t need you, nor does it need Jolie as a role model. She is the living example of how deep our society has gone down thanks to the creatures like you.

    RC

    Reply
  58. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    @lory:

    And no mia, that is exactly what we are NOT saying. We are saying it is NOT ok to speculate on subjects as serious as that about anyone without extremely solid foundation and it is NOT ok to lead your readers to believe you have that. Do you get what we are saying now?

    Reply
  59. lory said on April 25th, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    See now you finally got what I was saying! Nice that we can agree on something.

    Reply
  60. lory said on April 25th, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    @Reality Check:

    Huh? I wasn`t talking about any of this on this thread! On what sort of trip are you? Put down the meds – they seem to hurt you!

    Reply
  61. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @lory:

    Mia you are such a dumbass – we always got what YOU were saying, it’s just a shame you didn’t understand what WE were! I honestly have never encountered anyone who could so spectacularly miss the point as you can at almost every given opportunity. You’re like some sort of angry gnat-type creature who buzzes around other people’s conversations and tries to interject yourself into them but never gets remotely close to understanding what is going on, let alone drawing blood! It is utterly jaw-dropping!

    Reply
  62. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    @lory:

    Oh and stop stealing my lines b*tch!

    Reply
  63. Mili said on April 25th, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    http://womansday.ninemsn.com.au/celebrityheadlines/1043887/brad-and-ange-back-on-track

    Putting to rest recent speculation that their relationship is on the rocks, life in Venice seems happier than ever for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie – and their six children.

    With Brad’s parents Jane and William Pitt jetting in to check out the sights – and help out with babysitting duties whenever the need arises – the world’s most famous couple have enjoyed some precious time out together.

    Reply
  64. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    @Mili:

    Are you endorsing that story or being critical of it Mili?

    Reply
  65. Mili said on April 25th, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I am sorry, I am afraid to answer to you. I am scared of you!!!. I don’t want to receive your insults.!!

    Reply
  66. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 25th, 2010 at 6:33 pm

    @Mili:

    And so you should be Mili, and so you should be! Ha ha ha.

    Reply
  67. lory said on April 26th, 2010 at 1:19 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Nasty as always Keane! Oh by the way I always got the fact that you are disappointed in Ian for not following up his gross claims of bestiality and child molestation which seem to entertain you more then anyone here on this blog. Don`t let yourself stop in your desperate begging for more of that c.rap.

    Reply
  68. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 26th, 2010 at 6:11 am

    @ Mia – no sweetheart I think that is a pretty accurate assessment of your character to be honest, and one I think most people reeading here share!
    Oh and yet again Mia you have spectacularly misinterpreted my views, as usual representing them as the exact opposite of what they are rather than the reality in fact.

    And you think I have “desperately begged” for more details of the bestiality story or the child molestation story? Perhaps you’d like to link us to those quotes because that is a very serious allegation Mia so if you’re going to say something like that you better have the goods to back it up with. Especially when it is the exact opposite of what I have actually thought or said. However I await evidence to support your claim that I was “desperately begging” for the details of both those stories. Oh and remember when you thought the UN and the UNHCR were totally different organisations? Could be worth remembering that before you jump in here. Oh and when it comes to nastiness perhaps you’d like to review your posts when we were discussing that rather major faux pas of yours. I believe you called me “freak” on several occasions in anger at being called out for being so stupid, while I kept my language measured and polite at all times. Now who’s the nasty one? Try not to clutch at straws quite so much Mia. Ciao x

    Reply
  69. Mili said on April 26th, 2010 at 6:37 am

    http://www.okmagazine.com/2010/04/ok-exclusive-angie-brad-plan-quiet-ceremony/

    Angie & Brad Plan Quiet Ceremony

    They pride themselves on being humble and not wasting money,” says a friend of the couple. “So some over-the-top, beachfront affair with hundreds of guests isn’t going to happen.”

    http://www.nwonline.com.au/inthemag/in-the-mag.htm

    JEN The final betrayal: Her tears as Brad prepares to marry Angie.

    Ian:

    What do your sources say?…About Brangelina your sources were kidding you. BAD Info.
    According to you: Your sources say that Jen was with Gerard but according to the nwonline She is still crying for BRAD.

    ????????

    Reply
  70. inOttawa said on April 26th, 2010 at 6:43 am

    How can someone say: “… I kept my language measured and polite” when 3 postings earlier they are calling someone a “dumbass”. I don’t think “dumbass” is polite.

    Reply
  71. Reality Check said on April 26th, 2010 at 8:22 am

    @lory:

    There is a pretty simple connection between what you talked about on this thread and what I said in reply to you last night, but you don’t seem bright enough to see it outright, do you?

    The connection is: You are here to defend Angelina Jolie despite everything that makes her behaviour indefensible and we are here to call a spade a spade. I simply provided a number of arguments as to why she’s not worth anyone’s defence – including yours.

    Is that too complex for your level of mental development or do you want me to reword my long post, so that you get its meaning a lot faster? No problem – I like using words but I’m not sure you possess enough intelligence to understand we talk about.

    I’m sure that Ms Jolie laughs her but off whenever she reads the enthusiastic posts of those who think she is a goddess worth everybody’s admiration. She knows even better than us what kind of shit she is, so it must be funny for her to see the starry-eyed crowd gazing upwards at her with “ooohs” & “aaahs”.

    :)

    Reply
  72. WTF said on April 26th, 2010 at 11:36 am

    no offense to anyone who reads or posts here, but is it really that big a surprise to you that the owner of the blog is posting things that don’t seem “credible”? Some of the posts in the past 6 months that i’ve been reading didn’t seem to make much sense either, but if they were about Angelina Jolie, most of you ran with them trying to figure out those silly puzzles like they meant something. i’ve thought for a long time that maybe some of you were being played but heaven forbid anyone point it out as like someone above posted, you would incur the wrath of the locals.

    Its bad enough that people like Perez Hilton jump on stories just to be first without verifying sources, but you all claimed Ian was a “real” journalist, yet his breaking stories and exclusives either went no where or made no sense. I thought i had found a gossipy type site here, but i certainly never believed that there was any real scooping of stories happening. I did question some of those exclusives though i’ll tell you that.

    But you know what, its Ian’s site and he can post whatever he likes, and if we don’t like it, then i guess we can tune out. And to those who seem most disappointed, Keane and Kate, perhaps he wasn’t all you made him out to be? It happens. Sucks, but perhaps its time to stop defending him and start your own sites, you both seem very intelligent and knowledgeable.

    Reply
  73. Reality Check said on April 26th, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    @WTF:

    We are not defending him. We’ve already smelled a rat. The problem is we like getting together here and talk about various subjects. It’s just a habit we find difficult to break. Thank you for the “intelligent” and “knowledgeable” part, I truly loved it. :) And I must say that if Kate or Keane ever decide to start their own blogs, I’ll be the first to run there.

    That said, my opinion about Angelina Jolie predates my discovery of this blog and has nothing to do with Ian Halperin – I joined this place beginning of this year because his stance on her seemed to reflect mine. I’ve had great difficulty finding a blog with intelligent posters on this subject and when I came across this one, I thought I had finally found it. However, I. H. lets us down more and more often as time passes.

    I. H. doesn’t seem to realize how incredibly lucky he was to attract a lot of intelligent posters here. It’s the posters that make his website intriguing, not his posts. He thinks it might be due to his own greatness but he’s wrong – if you attracted intelligent people who thought you were greater than you are, do your best to preserve that precious first impression with good stories or they’ll turn their backs on you.

    As you see, intelligent responses to your post ARE possible, aren’t they? No local wrath or spite at all.

    RC

    Reply
  74. lory said on April 26th, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    to Keane

    “Mia you are such a dumbass – ”
    “Oh and stop stealing my lines b*tch!”

    Wow you call the above quotes polite? Sorry but you act like you have lost all sense of reality. You and Ian would make the perfect pair. To bad that that is never going to happen hm?

    Reply
  75. lory said on April 26th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    @Reality Check:

    Please show me the post were I called Jolie a godess will you? Or better – don`t waste your time because I never did! By the way I trust your reading abilities are sufficiant to understand what I wrote in THIS THREAD! Do I really have to repeat it so that you are able to grasp it?
    Fine: I was talking about not letting your personal dislike or fondnes for somebody influence your personal judgement. But that concept of not rushing to blindly believe every sordid claim without any proof about someone you dislike just because YOU think that person would be capable of it- seems to be lost on you!

    Reply
  76. lory said on April 26th, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    @inOttawa:

    ThanxI just pointed that out!

    Reply
  77. Reality Check said on April 26th, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    @lory:

    Poor spelling skills. Take a crash course on the subject, honey.

    Reply
  78. lurkeyloo said on April 26th, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    I picture Keane in her Mother’s basement pretending to be of some intelligence. She fights with everyone and seems to think she owns and directs the blog. We have had words on here because I asked her to please stop fighting with everyone. It is exhausting trying to read through the blog TOPIC comments when you have to sort through her mess. Of course, it isn’t her fault…it is everyone else’s :) . Major personality disorder. @Terri D:

    Reply
  79. Kate said on April 26th, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    @WTF:
    I am afraid you are misunderstanding . I know Ian on a more personal level, and my complaints are not about riddles, or puzzles, I am fine with those, blinds are not expected to be solid or they would not be blinds, would they? If that were the case Ted C would not talk in a language people can not understand.

    You can not be sued, for stating the truth, no matter how nasty or bad it is unless the person can prove you are doing it with the intent to destroy their career and not to just reveal the truth. So Ted, and Ian and Perez, and Blind Gossip or Lainey any one else can sit at their key board and tell all , as long as they can 1-prove it, 2-their sources will back them up and they can prove it, 3-they are willing to stand the fallout professionally from those who may be upset from it. The laws on the internet are even more loose than in written form.

    What you can not do is state something as fact if it is not, you can not make things up, (as someone did about Jen, like Miss Jolie and the baby story, that was grounds for a lawsuit if she wanted to pursue it) you can not just tell tall tales. If all of you reading here think that Keane and I have been saying that we think Ian tells tall tales, then 1.) let me correct that. No, we do not. Dawn Olsen is the one that implied that out of anger. 2) if anyone is thinking we believe his is intentionally lying on these stories , no we do not . Dawn also said that, and imo that was related to her friendship with AM, and the fact that Ian released his book while AM was working on was as well. She seemed a bit miffed about that, and has since that time. (I like Dawn, but that behavior was unprofessional) , and the example she used was pathetic and was torn apart easily, and I did. Either she did not read the book, or the person who wrote the article that she cited has reading comprehension problems. 3) stop defending Ian, again you misunderstand. I am disappointed in my friend, Keane is disappointed and there is no way for us to make it any clearer why, but I believe Ian does understand what I have said. To begin with our complaints were in his best interest, as it went along yes it was frustrating to watch him dig his heels in and be pig headed because it is not helping him in the long run. Ian is a bit of a shadow at times, but I also now his heart. Was I very disappointed with the SB story, yes indeed, do I question his sources, absolutely, but I also know Ian has some good contacts, and has made some strong alliances in the industry. What I question, and what Keane questions is that when his emotions are involved, he tends to not be able to clearly see the real story. I think he knows this too, because time and time again, it changes for him as he goes along. 4) for those of you who are not familiar with his work then you don’t really understand what I mean, the way he comes to conclusions, the way he thinks of himself, his family, his friends, you just sit here and judge by this site. Truth is you don’t know Ian at all. I feel like I can be a little more judgmental with him because I do, because he has been a friend, and a caring and compassionate one for over a year. 5) I may not agree with everything Ian says and does, and I may question his sources, and I will , and have, none of you are really aware. He is, he gets the emails with my questions that say, “uh, Ian ” he knows, exactly how I look at things and feel. 6) so Brad Pitt frucked up too, and you know what, everyone deserves another chance, if Angelina could convince me she were sincere, same there, but so far she has not. So with that last statement you should know how I feel about lan. 7)We already have a blog, and it is authored by several people. Covers lots of tops, not just Brange.

    Hope I have not offended you in anyway. Just trying to clarify, while we have been very disappointed with Ian , not ready to shoot in the back just yet. wink wink…

    Reply
  80. Yorkshire Girl said on April 26th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    Nice to see Lory/Mia arguing with his/herself again.

    Kramer V Kramer, you seem like a very angry person with the rants above and the posts a while ago raging at everyone and swearing at posters. If I were you, I would try to chill out before your blood pressure goes through the roof.

    I don’t know why people come on here to score points by attacking Keane, if she wants to question Ian’s sources, she has every right to. Just like you have every right to post your opinion here. So if you don’t post because you feel intimidated or threatened by what Keane might say in response, tough. That’s your own fault. Stop whining about it and grow a set of balls.

    Great post IOTB, made me laugh aloud.

    Glad to see you’re still posting RC.

    Reply
  81. Reality Check said on April 26th, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    @Yorkshire Girl:
    Thanks, YG. Glad to see myself still posting, too. How could I resist reading your opinions without posting?

    :)

    Reply
  82. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 26th, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    @lory:

    MAJOR sense of humour failure Mia – IT WAS A JOKE BITCH – GET OVER IT!

    Reply
  83. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 26th, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    And I picture LurkeyLoo on the ….. – ok no I don’t, that’s a total lie, I never picture LurkeyLoo doing anything because I never give her/him/whatever a moment’s thought! Please get over yourself LL. You bunch clutch to a little spat you had with me like it was the highlight of your life. It is tragic.

    Reply
  84. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 26th, 2010 at 4:50 pm

    @WTF:

    You shouldn’t mistake the regulars not expressing doubts on the veracity of some of those SR posts for not having any. We were trying to figure out what was being said in the posts – doesn’t mean to say we always believed them though, we just didn’t express those thoughts on the blog. Which is why I am saying now I am not cool with speculating on subjects when there is no solid basis for them: 1) it is unethical 2) it is a total waste of everyone’s time. Contrary to what a lot of people think I am not remotely interested in hearing a load of unsubstantiated dirt on someone. If it’s not true or it’s not relevant then I don’t want to waste valuable minutes of my life reading about it. Which is – among other reasons – why I said what I said to Ian. Fair enough, as I have always said it is his site and he can say what he likes, but I can’t pretend to carry on supporting him while he is doing it. Whatever Ian wants to say here doesn’t bother me at all and I am more than happy to carry on commenting on the things that do interest me elsewhere, but as I have supported him for so long it was obviously expected by people that I would either continue to do so or make some kind of statement about it. So basically here you go.

    Reply
  85. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    HaHaHaHa, omg! If you only knew the truth!!! You could NOT be further from describing Keane or her very exciting life if you tried. Dream on. Oh that was a good one!!! HaHaHa@lurkeyloo:

    Reply
  86. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 26th, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    @Patty anne:

    Thanks Patty Anne – yes that thought did just occur to me too! I always think how lucky I am to have had the life I have and to have done all the things I dreamed of as a child and it just keeps on getting better and better really, but people like our poor old Lurkey hold fast to the idea that I am “sitting in my mom’s basement pretending to be clever” – it’s hilarious! By the way Lurkey, today I went shopping on the King’s Road and popped in to The Saatchi Gallery for a quick look around – what did you get up to? “Sitting in my mom’s basement pretending to be clever” indeed. What an utter tool!

    Reply
  87. Keane Fan said on April 26th, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    @keane…how’s that blog coming…ready to bookmark any time now…

    @lori…I understand your frustration, and your arguments are what I would have to say myself if I were to join the “conversation”…but it’s a futile endeavour, don’t you see ? I call myself a brangelina fan, but i don’t necessarily consider her the most beautiful, the best acctress, the best mother, the best filantropist, etc, and she most probably banged Brad before he was officially separated…what I really admire about her is her free spirit and her boldness in doing what she’s f..ing pleasing, I perceive her as the epitome of cool….apparently the people on this site are resenting her for the exact same reasons, statisticaly it was bound to happen, right? Why I come to this site: it is one stop shopping!- I find out all the latest news without making the effort to search or read anything else, and most importantly, I am here to contemplate the human folly…I love all the characters, they are very well defined and well balanced in the big picture…I have to give it to Keane, if it was not for her compulsive little Oxford brain that doesn’t allow any post to go unchecked, vetted or rebutted, there’ll be absolutelly no fun whatsoever….Lori, keep it up if you can, Keane thrives on it !

    Reply
  88. Alif said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:00 am

    @moo:
    @ 7:06a.m. Apr.25th
    Hi moo; That’s the exact reaction I had. Then I had others; e.g. Jen should start evaluating her friends. Some of them sound more like enemies.

    Those “insiders” do have the same sound/tone to their reports that we feel comes from the Brangelina camp; just as the scientology posters have with theirs about little Tom.

    I gave the Brangelina book to our big, downtown library; and another to a local library.
    Just before the book came out, Ian asked us about the cover. I said at least twice, that if I was browsing at a bookstore, it probably wouldn’t hold my interest. And I can say the reason was the conflict of imagery. The cover looked like it could be right for a coffee table; but the content is supposed to ba an expose of the frauds.
    It ended up like the Andrew Morton book about Tom C. It went nowhere, almost. That’s why I had to donate those two copies. Will check to see if they are available at those libraries.
    I did see the Michael Jackson book prominently displayed at the local. It’s right there as one enters the library.

    Reply
  89. Alif said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:20 am

    I had to laugh at the report of Jen “crying” over the alleged upcoming Brangelina nuptials. Crying over someone who is somewhat “girly” and is probably bi, or gay? Someone who is missing at least one sensitivity chip? Someone who practically vowed that he wouldn’t marry until ALL people (read, gays) are free to marry?

    But I have heard so many lies from Angelina (Announcing she’d retire after her latest film to raise her children; then signing for another film; after which, a similar announcement coming forth about quitting.)

    I told about the Hitlerian Lie! I said that initially, the people were outraged by Hitler, then as the lies were repeated, more and more people fell in line with Hitler’s thinking.
    I felt that was going to come true with Brangelina’s lies, as well. Of course, the bloggers like Perez Hilton and LAINEY would be Brangie’s instruments of propaganda. And it’s all come to fruition. More and more bloggers are falling in line with Brangelina’s agenda.
    And that’s why I’m hoping there’ll be some courageous authors out there to continually set the record straight.
    Of course, if Angie makes amends to Jen, the Brangeloonies, and Society, it will be a big step in the right direction.
    But, I won’t bet the rent!

    Reply
  90. Mili said on April 27th, 2010 at 6:10 am

    The news about the wedding is growing. Now Grazia Mag, a tabloid tipically against Brangie is agree with OK Mag.

    http://www.graziadaily.co.uk/LatestIssue/archive/2010/04/27/in-this-week-s-grazia-drama-courtesy-of-katie—tom–coachella-and-the-jazziest-.htm

    So It will be a hard time for everybody here. Ian, again: What kind of source do you have? Your worst enemies?. I think that work against Angie was your worst JOB. She won!!!.

    Reply
  91. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 7:08 am

    @ Mili – you need to brush up on your knowledge of media outlets Mili. Grazia has always been and still is a vehicle for Jolie’s PR. It has only once broken ranks from her – and reluctantly at that – and that was to report the story “that just would not go away” which was of course Ian’s book. The week before last they were the only mag in the UK who put Angelina on the cover (carrying the hackneyed is she pregnant? story) – the other mags all had someone else on them – she is simply just not as newsworthy any more. Grazia is owned by the publishers who own OK magazine who she has exactly where she wants them if you know what I am saying.

    Oh and I completely agree with Alif, the way Angelina’s propaganda has been taken up by the press and has swayed the majority of the world into supporting her truly reminds me of the way people were indoctrinated into Hitler’s campaign or an Orwellian state. It is truly disturbing.

    Reply
  92. Reality Check said on April 27th, 2010 at 7:14 am

    @Keane Fan:
    “What I really admire about her is her free spirit and her boldness in doing what she’s f … ing pleasing, I perceive her as the epitome of cool …”

    SURE. It must be the epitome of cool to make no amends, no damage control, JUST NOTHING. It must be the epitome of cool to take whatever you please without asking yourself if you’re about to enter someone else’s life like an elephant in a glass shop. Why should some casualties matter and be perceived as humans when Angie wants something?

    It must be the epitome of cool to obtain whatever you want by spinning a web of intrigues and lies for a year and more. It must be the epitome of cool to start a smear campaign against the wife of the man you’ve been banging for a year because you want the man but you also don’t want to be cast as the home wrecker.

    It must be the epitome of cool to want to look squeaky clean in the public eye and organize a crowd of minions who throw mud balls at your lover’s wife via the Internet until she doesn’t look like a wife material, a mother material or any kind of material anymore. Any potential reminders of the fact that Angie Jo was meddling with something that wasn’t her territory in the first place should be totally annihilated.

    And when you finally get what you wanted, it is the epitome of cool to keep giving the public a detailed timeline of your “falling in love” for years IN A SHARP CONTRAST WITH your highly moral statements about what you would and wouldn’t do because of the example your own father represents. The enemy must not only be dead but be reminded all the time about it.

    The epitome of cool? The people like you make me sick. Now I really see where Angelina Jolie gets all her fans from – she doesn’t even have to be the best woman, actress, mother or humanitarian; all she has to be is this really cool chick who does as she f … ing pleases without giving a damn about those she happened to go over.

    Reply
  93. lurkeyloo said on April 27th, 2010 at 10:10 am

    Hardly, darling. You are the tragedy. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  94. lurkeyloo said on April 27th, 2010 at 10:19 am

    So, I guess I just dream up the consant bickering you do on this site?

    Funny, how does one have so much time for such a fab life when you are ALWAYS commenting and fighting on this blog?? How can it be so wonderful when you spend such a huge amount of time spitting hate at so many others? So what if you went shopping….I do my fair share, as well…..shopping doesn’t cure a HATEFUL BITCH. You are a mean and nasty person to so many people, Keane. You are a sad individual with a false sense of self and a good deal of anger.

    The only things I hold fast to are my friends, good times and enjoying the lovely things life has to offer. I’m fairly certain you went shopping ALONE. Enjoy! @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  95. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 10:25 am

    @lurkeyloo:

    I take it you didn’t have too much to shout about with regards to your day then?! How surprising! But so long as it makes you feel better about yourself to imagine me sitting in my mother’s basement or something (not so common in the UK I have to point out!) I am happy to continue to indulge your fantasy. And hey, you can always show your gratitude by wiring me the occasional hundred bucks or two from the fortune you’ll save on self-esteem classes. Just call me a social service! Lol

    Reply
  96. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 10:36 am

    @lurkeyloo:

    Yep I always go shopping alone hun – I like to get in, get what I need and go home again as fast as humanly possible! It’s not an activity I hugely enjoy so like to get it over and done with as quickly as possible. But you can definitely chalk that one up as “something to feel better about myself with in relation to Keane today” dear, should you so desire, I will give you that one gratis. And perhaps next time you are accusing someone of anger issues you might want to count to ten before you make your post. I am laughing at you hon, I am not angry. You started it and you can dish it out, but you just can’t take it. You fly off the handle every time and frankly, it is funny.

    Oh and by the way, I see that you are the sort of person that you just can’t win with. If I was sitting in my mother’s basement flat then it would be shameful, if you were doing it it would of course be “spending time with someone’s family and friends”. If I go shopping somewhere glam on my way home from work I am “sad and lonely” but if it were anyone else it would be a fab way to spend a spare hour or two of my day right? All you do is take which ever argument is in opposition to mine and spew it at me with venom, even if the one you are spewing now contradicts the one you spewed before. I have always said if you’re going to fight with me, pick a line and stick to it, you cannot have it all ways. And if you don’t like me, don’t address me, refer to me or comment on anything I have said. I do not like you and do not seek your friendship. Now take that to your self-esteem class and let them do the rest.

    Reply
  97. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 10:39 am

    @Keane Fan:

    And just to say never fear your post has not been forgotten – I will return later!

    Reply
  98. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 10:39 am

    @lurkeyloo:

    Oh and it’s called a Blackberry – sucker!

    Reply
  99. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 10:59 am

    @Keane Fan:

    By the way, passive-aggressive Kate says hi and that she loves your work (or used to!). Just one small query though that occurred to us both: are they paying you for this too? Chat soon! x

    Reply
  100. lurkeyloo said on April 27th, 2010 at 11:05 am

    Sweetheart, my line has always been, and always will be, that you are tiring.

    Your posts to me are no different that the countless self obsessed, hate filled posts you regurgitate to everyone else you disagree with on this blog. I enjoy the Brange gossip on this site…not sifting through your delusional self worth and abuse of others due to your self hatred (let’s face it, that couldn’t be more true).

    I’m also well aware of what a Blackberry is and maybe you should look up from your own and enjoy life a little more. You know, look around at what a “glam” life you lead instead of worrying so constantly about the hate you spew. Glam life, indeed!!! @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  101. crouching tiger said on April 27th, 2010 at 11:27 am

    While BP and JA parading their family for paparazzi with their big fake smile, Jen is actually getting hotter and hotter. She lives much simpler and happier life than these two liars.

    Btw, Have you guys checked the video Behind The Scenes SmartWater Ads on YouTube? Jen is really hot in that black and white video. Her abs is unbelievable!

    Reply
  102. Reality Check said on April 27th, 2010 at 11:54 am

    @crouching tiger:

    Thanks, Crouching Tiger! I’ve just searched YouTube for the video and found it! I have never seen such an excellent video of Jennifer Aniston before – she looks absolutely lovely and gorgeous in this one. Here is the link for those who may want to see it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl9H2IZzR-Q

    :)

    RC

    Reply
  103. Patty anne said on April 27th, 2010 at 12:09 pm

    You’d gladly give your eye teeth to be where Keane is in her life, and the associates she works with. I’m just glad she has time to share what she can of her daily experiences, and aquaintences with us. If you get that chip of inferriority off your shoulder and pay attention, you may pick up a clue or two. ‘Nuff said.@lurkeyloo:

    Reply
  104. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    I started reading this site about two years ago, and I don’t post much.

    I think the point Kate and Keane are making about Ian’s sources are valid. I used to check in about every two or three days to see what was up and then my visits got fewer because he would say that a story was developing and then there was no follow-up. It was a little frustrating. One in particular was about a major sports star that was going to be even worse than Tiger Woods. Maybe it came out and I missed it. Then there was all that stuff that was supposedly from Lady Gaga’s band about Jolie dating Gaga, which seemed a stretch.

    I think there is a lot of hit and miss. When Ian hits something, it is usually pretty darn over-the-top. Is there some kind of crazy Nazi sex tape of Bullock? God only knows, but there were certainly many media stories in many places after that about James’ fascination with all things Nazi, and there does seem to be a sexual element to it if we add the attraction to the McGhee girl (just from her photos—I don’t know what she is really like, but she did do sexualized Nazi photos.

    The Jen stuff. I have read some things from actresses who worked with her who expressed a level of annoyance with her. I have read in other places that friends of hers get very frustrated with the fact that she refuses to date regular guys who aren’t famous. I could see even good friends saying that after awhile. I don’t know what is going on with her. I like the fact that she is single and seems very happy and together, but I do think she may still be caught up—not with Brad as a husband exactly—but with being at the top of the world as the ultimate Prom King and Queen. I never thought anything was going on with Gerard (he’s such a dog they can’t keep him contained to even stop drooling after every third woman that passes on the street—he’s definitely due a neuter. He would be a leg-humper if he was a boxer) but who knows. I wish she would just come out and be interviewed. She had a friend of hers interview her for an Elle and it was just one of the fluff pieces about being wonderful and was pretty boring. She alluded to being happy being single on Oprah but Oprah was so careful around her that I really didn’t get any insight. Just……tell people that you want to date actors. That you’re afraid of average guys because you might not trust them because they might be after your money? That you were shocked and hurt about the end of your marriage and had some trouble getting through it? That she doesn’t do this makes me wonder if there is some self-esteem issue getting in the way. Just…speak honestly. Tell your story.. Brad and Angie certainly told theirs.

    I don’t think Ian is making this stuff up completely, and I do think there is some ‘plants’, but I do doubt the Jen story is one of them. I do believe her friends could be getting a little annoyed. I get a little annoyed at my closest friends if I think they are only dating losers or whatever. Maybe a maid overhears some of the girls saying “I wish Jen would just date a normal guy. Why would she think Gerard Butler could ever be a serious boyfriend”" and then the maid tells someone.

    Now, the Madonna/Jolie and Gaga/Jolie stuff? I’m having trouble.
    Brad and Angie have issues? I think so. Really, they’ve become boring. The photos of the kids are cute but her dad is a loon and the balcony photos aren’t even worth a click anymore. I never thought I’d be bored looking at photos of Venice, but I think Brad and Angie hysteria is over. They come up on other blogs I read among other stories and people don’t choose to even comment on them. They have exhausted everyone, I guess. They may be perfectly fine people—-I wish their kids had more stability but okay—-but they are over.

    Lindsey Lohan, ironically, has brought her career soaring back to life with the paps because everyone wants to get the last photo in before she dies. At least that’s the way it looks. She’s a strung out Edward Gorey drawing and I often like her shoes and some of her outfits. Plus her parents are so insane networks won’t even attempt to do a reality show on them—and they are prime for that kind of thing.

    The most interesting things in the rags lately have been the little skulking Lohan and watching Kate Gosselin find something to do out of the house. I don’t know if anyone has ever had any dealings with a Gosselin fan, but they are psychotic. I once posted that she wasn’t great on the view and people started saying I was posting under an alias and was actually some person somewhere and they refer to some website I’ve never heard of and don’t remember. Major conspiracy theorists.

    Now I’m going to look at the link for the Tom Cruise sex tape, before it disappears into the tenth dimension of Ursus.

    Reply
  105. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 12:31 pm

    @Mili:
    “they pride themselves on being humble and not spending money”???????
    That’s a really funny quote for a couple who live in some 70 million dollar villa three months of the year and have an island in Dubai and oh who knows what else? A man cave, lots of property in LA. Private jets. Their lives are alter to the God of Consumerism.
    Whatever they are…..they are spenders and consumers. Everyone can argue about other aspects of them, but I don’t see how that’s even up for debate.

    Reply
  106. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    @mooki:
    Thanks for that link.

    Look at Mariah!!! I’ll have some of what she’s having!!! That girl is looking happy and high and I want a day of that kind of spaced-out bliss. Probably some drugs to calm me down, a glass or bottle of high quality champagne, a giant bubble bath, a husband who holds my umbrella, closets of gorgeous clothes.
    That girl is having fun.

    Reply
  107. Tinkuy said on April 27th, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    back to Lohan: according to Mario Lavandeira, Michael Lohan tweeted that LiLo has HIV & Tommy Mottola shtupped her when she was 17. The tweets were deleted & now Papa Lohan claims his Twitter account was hacked. Developing …

    Reply
  108. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    And if she truly weighs 200 pounds, she’ll never realize it as the staff will hide the scales so as not to upset her as well as shield her from any unkind publications. They’ll sew new labels in her silk gowns and I’m sure Nick will says she looks more lovely than ever.

    I think she’s in such a happy land that it might take a weight gain that involves cranes to lift her out of the house for her to notice, and I’m sure that’s not going to happen.

    You have to love her. And she doesn’t look 200 pounds in that photo anyway.

    Reply
  109. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    @Tinkuy:
    My God, do you think he is capable of saying that???
    Surely it really was hacked by some person who was sick of his twitter war. Maybe Dina had someone to hack in to put something outrageous in there to make him look worse. He is beginning to gain support from the public for trying to do something—particularly as the younger sister is with her. It’s my understanding that lindsey calls him and tweets him when she needs help up to two days ago.
    I think he’s seeming like a big creepy abusive bully. I’m glad someone is trying to do something, but if that’s the way your parent shows they care……very sad indeed. He is banging down the door at tmz and Dina is banging down the door at radar and x17. Lindsey is tweeting. Maybe lIndsey should stop by tmz herself.
    It’s insane. But it’s kind of riveting in a sick way. It really is like watching a train about to collide with something or a car accident in slow motion—-you can see it’s heading somewhere.

    Reply
  110. Reality Check said on April 27th, 2010 at 1:06 pm

    @pickwick:
    That was very interesting, Pickwick – I mean it was very interesting to read about Jen’s friends and what they might think about her dating pattern, but I think it is actually realistic of her to date only men who are somehow not the regular guys. Very few regular guys would be able to deal with the noise level and the constant scrutiny around her, so that’s hardly narcissism on her part. I don’t know her and I’ve never met her in person, but as far as I’m concerned (and judging by myself) very few regular people whose calling is not in the movie industry will agree to live the kind of life she lives – cameras constantly in your face, every move analyzed out of existence. Unless you have a talent that needs to be shown to the world and that thought accompanies you in the process, the entertainment industry’s noise can drive anybody crazy, IMO.

    Reply
  111. Kate said on April 27th, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    @pickwick:
    Welcome back PW, nice to see you, some thought provoking comments. I can agree pretty much with all you have said. I heard Jen say though that she has had a difficult time getting past her marriage, I also have heard her her say it is almost impossible to be with some one outside of the bubble they live in. Brad also is of that same belief. I don’t belief it was a friend of Jens. Not a friend, because a friend would not use the loon manta , “poor poor Jen” that thought process is not something a friend of a multi-millionaire actress who is in the best shape of her life, making more movies than she ever has, with her own production company, would make. I understand that one of your or my friends may say that and get annoyed with us, but not in her world. That is simple deflection at it’s worst.

    Let me explain further. It has been almost 6 years since they have been a solid couple. Jen is at her prime right now and has a beautiful home, and decorated all in the spirit of what she said she did not like, in some areas. She suddenly has this interest in architecture. No, she did not have that before and in many of her interviews she would pass that interest of to “her husband”.. but here she is now taking up Brad’s interest.

    She has dated nothing but bi-guys for the most part, and as Ted likes to label Jen , no offense intended here, using his term, a fag hag..and that is true, all of her male friends are gay or bi. Now I know that there are Jen fans that will scream that loons like to say that the men in her life are all gay, well sorry, but they are. There is a reason for that. She does not want anyone in her life in a relationship. She is enjoying her life and having fun, her career, and what…biding her time, or getting on with her life. IDK.

    There are two major sources that maintain two different thoughts on this. Jen is a extremely private person when it comes to her private life, and I can promise you that if something is leaked it is becasue she wants it to be. If someone overhears something at a party, it is because they were suppose to. So either she and Brad both want everyone to believe via IT and Bill the bodyguard that they are indeed getting back together at the end of this year, or they are both using that as a deflection for some other reason. What would the other reason be..careers maybe. Beards , who knows?

    Next, I could see a producer wanting to spark up TBH, and ask them to play it up, for the press, and it was reported that they were asked to do that, and then they backed off of it, IT reported she backed off because Brad became distant. She assured him it was just a friendship. Bill the BG says she still loves him, Brad wants her back. They have been consistent with that now for about a year.

    Ted on the other hand says Jen wants no other partner in her life right now because Bradley hurt her to bad, that is was tough getting past that, and she is just having fun, but one one day she will. Look at the men she has been tied to. It is pretty obvious that one was a friend, one was nothing but part of a Smart Water ad, one was just hanging out, one was completely gay and is with a beard now, one is bi and trashes all his girls and will probably come out at some point, (some say that relationship was not real) and the last one was never anything but a friend. Are we to believe Jen has been celibate for six years? no of course not, but she has not had a serious relationship imo, for one of theses reasons.

    1-she does not want to trust anyone again and likes being single
    2-she still loves Brad and can not find anyone else she feels that way about
    3-she is gay

    I don’t believe Jen is gay. Some do, but she was too emotionally damaged from Brad imo for that to be true, but it would explain things for both of them. I don’t know if they are getting back together, but one or both of them are certainly making a damn good case for it, and Noah Levy said on Ian’s chat that he never goes to print without 3 seperate verifications. He has named his sources as of late. That tends to lend more credibility imo, that and as soon as the “Pitts are Hillibilliy’s was published, and Brad met Jen and madeout” was printed, mom and dad promptly showed up in Venice for the show and tell on the balcony. We however did not see much interaction with Angelina. It was strained. Brad seemed happier his parents were there.

    I could also believe that she is just enjoying being single and having a good time, and would like to find the right guy and get married again (as she has said, and have a baby) but she will not do it until she is positive he is the one.

    So herein lies the problem. Whose source is more reliable? Ian’s or Noah’s? Can they both be solid? Yes. Why I say that is for this reason, each one is telling each reporter what they want out there. Bill however is recounting things he has witnessed over five years, and things said recently. Jen’s so called friend is telling what she has been told to say, by whomever.

    That is my opinion. They both can not be right. Rather all three. Ian, Noah, Ted. I have a feeling Ted probably knows if the Noah story is true or not as he hints to it now and then. I believe though that these sources , however good Ian may feel they are, are using him right now. Deflection, just as Angelina did. She allowed her sources or sent them to do the exact same thing last year, which is why we kept getting so many conflicting reports. That is why it is so frustratiing. A story is only as good as a source. Ian can not name his source unfortunately, and IT can. That is too bad, because when someone is willing to go on record, whether everyone believes them or not, it adds credibility. The fact that we saw Part 1, 2, and 3 got squashed from Bill, bumped it up a notch. I am sure Angie called with “I want my image back!”

    lol nuff said, no offense Ian, just the way it works for readers, you know that..

    Reply
  112. lurkeyloo said on April 27th, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    Doubt it, Honey. I also don’t recall pulling your chain. Thanks for the input though…like you actually know “Keane”. Riiiight. YOU might give your eye teeth to be her…I wouldn’t give a rats ass. By “taking time out” to give us her “daily experiences” from her “glam” life you mean acting like a complete BEAST to people that come here to comment, I’m sure. If she had such a great life she wouldn’t feel the need. Buy into it if you wish, Patty Anne….but people who have to blow their own horn constantly do not typically have anything to really blow on about. @Patty anne:

    Reply
  113. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    Ok now Lurkey, I am samcc here because you are the very definition of someone who will use any argument you can think of to try to score a point, even if they are completely inconsistent! I noticed it before and it amused me then and you are doing the exact same thing now so I thought I better point it out to you. So first of all I am a loser siting in my mother’s basement and I said actually no, I have a great place in a great part of London town, I work in some pretty cool (and sometimes glam) places and sometimes some not so cool/glam one’s too and I generally lead a pretty interesting and fun life. So you said oh then you shop on the Kings Road and go to galleries oh well that makes you shallow and lonely and friendless, the only thing that matters in life is family and friends like you have. So I’m like ok, so the only thing that matters in life is family and friends, so by your rationale if I was living in my mother’s basement flat my life would be great because all that matters is having loved ones around you right? So which is it? Am I really sh*t because I live a sad life in my mother’s basement or am I really sh*t because I lead a really fun, glam life in London and that is really shallow and all that matters is family and friends? Take my point?

    Oh and the looking at my Blackberry thing – you condescended to advise me that I should stop looking at it and look around me at the view instead. Can I just ask whether that advice also holds true when I am stood in the queue at the supermarket or on my daily route home on the bus – should I also be looking around at the view then? I would appreciate you advising me on this as you clearly have the 101 on exactly how I should live my life. Further to this, can I also ask whether your advice also holds true if I was reading a great work of literature rather than looking at my blackberry – should I also look around me at the view instead then too? This particular issue is really puzzling me as I understand I should prioritise view over bb, but am not sure where to place book – does it come before bb but after view or should I make it my top priority? I await your humble instruction.

    Oh and I now understand that your main complaint about me is that I am “tiring”, ok, well I think I can help you out on this one. All my posts are quite clearly precised by my username. I believe one of the reasons this function was devised was so that PEOPLE WHO FOUND CERTAIN POSTER’S COMMENTS “TIRING” COULD SKIP OVER THEM (capitalised for emphasis) – had you never considered this? Also, I feel my comments may be less tiring for you if you CEASED RESPONDING TO THEM (capitalised for emphasis again) – do you think that option might work for you at all? Because for most people afflicted with the same ennui as you claim to be suffering from, I think that may just do the trick. Difference is though, those individuals may have one or both of two personal qualities: 1) self-restraint 2) the absence of a massive chip on their shoulder, which might make trying this strategy a little more successful for them. Anyway, see what you can do!

    Reply
  114. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    LOL – yeah Patty Anne and I definitely don’t know each other – you are absolutely correctamundo there!!!! Good lord whatever is she going to come out with next?!? LMAO

    Reply
  115. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    @Keane Fan:

    Did you think she was the “epitome of cool” when she did a trolley dash around some of the world’s poorest countries, stuffing as many vulnerable bambinos into her basket as she could get away with and ripping them away from the only home they had ever known with less than 30 minutes introduction and dumped them on a team of nannies who continue to comprise the majority of the parenting role today?

    Did you think she was the “epitome of cool” when she legged it to the nearest disaster zone/refugee camp available at short notice to exploit the world’s most vulnerable and troubled people for a bit of good PR every time her image hit the skidders?

    Did you think she was the “epitome of cool” when she waged a hate campaign against the woman whose husband she has effectively borrowed for press because she thought she was a threat to her and convinced the whole world that the only purpose of a woman/wife in this world is to breed kids for her husband, thus setting back the feminist movement by at least 50 years?

    Is that when you thought she was at her most “free-spirited” and “coolest” because if so I think you have been played bitch, sorry to say. Angie Jo may seem like a crazy, wild-at-heart, free-spirit to those without eyes to see or brains to comprehend, but to the rest of us she comes across as exactly what she is: a desperate and probably mentally unwell fame-whore who will do and say absolutely anything provided it gets the world’s attention. Not quite the same thing is it? Sorry if that upsets your world view or compromises your fandom, either way I think it had to be said.

    Reply
  116. Nobody knows said on April 27th, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    @Kate:

    In fact if you look at it nobody knows what is really going on with Jen. Everybody is guessing what is going on in her life but nobody knows.

    Reply
  117. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    @pickwick:

    Pickwick I think Jen just likes to keep her private life private – as I would in her situation. Seriously, would you really want to share intimate details of your personal life with the whole world? Cos I sure as hell wouldn’t. But I think she knows she has to do it like so many of them do because that is what sells a film these days and without it she couldn’t do the roles she does. So I think in order to rectify that situation she just lies and makes it up. The world has it’s story, her films sell and she keeps her private loves, flings and flirtations private – isn’t that what you would do in her situation? That’s if you wanted to be a HW actress of course!

    Reply
  118. lurkeyloo said on April 27th, 2010 at 3:27 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    My, my what a rant you have gone on for someone with so much going on for them! How DO you find the time? :)

    I think you lead a shit life because of who you seem to BE not what you do or don’t do…where you live or don’t live. You are constantly on the attack and talking non-stop about how superior you are to everyone else. Like I said to PA above, those who have to blow their horn to let everyone know how great they are…usually aren’t.

    Actually, Keane, I have been nothing BUT consistent in my stating that you are a beastly human being when it comes to the comments you make to others on this blog. My argument has never changed…and I don’t need to score points with you. I don’t pour over every post you make (how would I find the time, you seem to live on here)…it usually only takes reading a few words or sentences to realize that you are blasting someone about how beneath you they are and then I move on. However, it is hard to move on when it seems every other post is you going at it with someone. Lately, there hasn’t been much to move on to since this blog is in its downward spiral (sadly). When you have genuinely had something to say about what I come here to read, I will gladly see what you have to say. You have had some excellent input that I have enjoyed reading. Mostly, you are putting other people down and being self-righteous.

    You seem to be the one with all of the self esteem issues and a chip on the shoulder. It is evident from your behavior and how you treat a lot of the posters on this blog.

    Reply
  119. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    @Reality Check:
    Good point. Plus I really think it would be hard to know if you could trust that someone wasn’t just looking for money or fame. She’s a lovely woman, but I think she would have to be extra careful about finding someone.
    However, if she could find someone outside the industry it might be a nice change. I’m sure there are a lot of very decent, nice guys who don’t have fame who would love to date her because they really liked her. And then look at the actor pool. She’s not terribly political…….I can’t really see her with a businessman —probably because she seems like someone who seems playful and fun…….and then there are actors and lots of those are gay and then the ones who aren’t ……well…….Gerard Butler. Petri dish.
    If she were my friend, I would be longing for her to date someone who was just a good guy even if he wasn’t famous. This is the most thought I’ve put into Jennifer Aniston ever. I can’t believe I’m sitting here worrying about her dating life. She’s probably smoking pot in Hawaii today and here I sit typing about her love life. She’s definitely more sane than me.
    Oh! And since I’ve already gotten this far into my dementia, her roles! She tried to play against type in that Clive Owen movie and I thought she did a good job. But apparently it didn’t make the money her little rom coms make and I think she expressed frustration over people not accepting her in different roles. Then she gets castigated by movie reviewers for not branching out.
    Then think about what happened to Sandra Bullock and it must feel very good to not have to worry about that mess and just stay single. It’s not like things like that don’t happen to all of us, but they have to live it out in front of the cameras which is so much worse.

    Reply
  120. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    Yep – knew you couldn’t manage it! You never disappoint me LL! And yes, I think we have covered the “time on my hands” aspect already hon – it’s called multi-tasking! Oh and I’m glad to hear you’ve enjoyed some if not all of my posts, it’s just a shame you haven’t quite figured out yet that they are neither written for your attention or your approval so I have no idea why you feel the need to keep giving your opinion on them! I am going to go back to minding my own business, not knowing Patty Anne and either [delete which ever you consider appropriate] being a loser in my mother’s basement but with a loving family or leading a glamorous and exciting but shallow and lonely existence on the King’s Road and other glamorous locations around London now – that ok with you Lurkey? Great, cheers.

    Reply
  121. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @Kate:
    Well, Thanks Keane. I didn’t know anyone would notice me coming or going.
    I just agree completely with everything you said about the sources and how much of this stuff is just fed out there for PR reasons. Look at blind items on Crazy Days and Nights. It’s so obvious some of those are plants. There was one that said a certain person was coming out this week and didn’t want any other famous person to come out to steal their thunder. I mean…how many celebs come out every week? I wasn’t aware there was that large a crowd willing to subject themselves to a homophobic, mean-spirited public. (not all but wow obviously some) Then there is the little link from People about the exclusive and it just all tied back together. to get everyone talking they planted the blind source item first. And you are right that nothing gets out they don’t want out. So when Ian is talking about really weird things about Angie and Brad I thought that someone in Brad’s family was basically fighting it out with someone in Angie’s family on this website. One of them called Ian and said “Brad is a terrible drunk who sleeps in the vineyard” and then his family would respond with “Angie is unstable and angry and dificult and demented”.
    There was this ongoing, interesting feud here and then when they went to Venice, it was lock down time. No more of the leaks. They had their official line and they are sticking to it. They’ve shut down their familiy members and are being more careful. Where does the lawsuit stand against the paper that says they signed papers at an attorney’s office?
    I’m not sure what to think of Ian because I don’t know the guy. My feeling about him is that he probably has a lot of irons in the fire. It’s hard to write books—it takes an amazing amount of discipline. The research, the writing, the editing, the PR. It’s a lot. He did the MJ thing and the the Brangie book and I get the feeling that this blog is more about just keeping his name out there and keeping him relevant more than really following stories and tracking them down. Perez has staff now, I think. I don’t know how much trouble they’ve managed to get him into for putting ‘little people’ porn up, but he doesn’t do it all.
    The sites like tmz and radar have staff. Does Ian have anyone? So I guess he’s a guy who still has connections to some of these people and can still call the friend of a friend of this celeb or that who is int he headlines but he doesn’t follow through because this isn’t his real focus probably.
    Maybe?? I’m just throwing that out there.

    Reply
  122. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    x

    Reply
  123. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    By the way, you do realise that you have now become the person I am “going at it” with again don’t you? You started it and you have persisted with it even though I have challenged you not to. And this is not the first occasion either is it? See any problem in that? Yep, didn’t think so – never mind!

    Reply
  124. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Well, I understand her desire for privacy, but I think the public would warm up to her a lot if she would just come out honestly and talk about some of this stuff. Why not? Why not just connect to average women who might have something in common with her? I respected her restraint and reserve early on, but now I think the public would probably like to hear something. She is still on the covers of tabloids all the time linking her to Brad. Why not just address the rumors? Oprah does that. She just picks up the Enquirer and says “it says this and I’m going to tell you about it”. You don’t have to do it about every silly ’story’ but there are so many women who would be able to relate to what she’ s been through. Why not come out and be a kind of advocate for being a single woman and being happy in your career?
    I just think it would help so much if she would just speak candidly about some of this ongoing, persistant rumor mill.

    Reply
  125. Reality Check said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    @pickwick:

    Good points, too, Pickwick. What’s even more interesting is your points reminded me of a book that came out at the beginning of this year. The title was “Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr Good Enough” and the author was a certain Lori Gottlieb. I haven’t read the book, nor had I heard about the author before, but the reaction to that book was so interesting that I even copied some of the comments to a file and then saved it on my computer.

    In short, the book came out with a very interesting concept on happiness and tried to persuade women that they could find instant happiness if only they agreed to lower their expectations and think about that nice guy in the corner who has been overlooked all along because of their high expectations. I never made a post about that book on the pages that offered the reviews but many other people did and many found the concept outrageous.

    So did I and I could never figure out what the bologna the author wanted to say and why. Advising anyone to lower their expectations in order to find SOME happiness and not remain alone looks like the craziest piece of advice in the world. Many a marriage has failed because at some point someone said to himself or herself “Where the heck am I going with these high expectations of mine?” and then settled for someone ho-hum and less-than-inspiring.

    So if Jen doesn’t want to settle for anyone because nobody seems good enough, I can only say she has my complete respect because I’m the same. It doesn’t pay to choose someone who doesn’t meet your expectations just because the rest of the world may think “Who the hell you think you are to be so choosy? If only you were less choosy, you would have ended up with a nice guy a long time ago.”

    This is not the world’s business. The best relationships are based on chemistry rather than mere common sense. If something doesn’t look like the real deal, don’t go for it unless you want to be stifled in a tepid relationship. Here is the page where I first learned about that book. Both the article and the comments are very interesting, indeed, though I don’t want to enforce my opinion on anyone:

    http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/sex/dating-advice-7-mistakes-single-women-make-580573/?pg=5#comments

    :)

    Reply
  126. crouching tiger said on April 27th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    I always wanna know what she’s like in real life. The image is that she’s a real nice person and cheerful. But I’ve been to her board at IMDB, there are some posters claiming have worked with her, have met her, saying she’s a real b!tch and a diva! And pickwick said there are actresses who are annoyed by her. Is it true Jen is not really a down to earth person, that maybe she’s a real diva?

    Reply
  127. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

    Nice try LL! xx

    Reply
  128. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    @pickwick:

    Yes I agree with you – her PR does make her look desperate and fake and I think she is smart enough to know that. Which is why I tend to think she has something to hide. It is just logic really. If she didn’t I don’t think she’d be allowing herself to become the object of ridicule the way she has been. What she has to hide is unclear though so it is obvious that her strategy has worked for her up until this point. I would tend to guess it is either her sexuality (as is the case with so many others engaged in fauxmances) or it is that she was keeping everything quiet and drumming up some publicity for her films while secretly hooking back up with Brad. Kate tends to think the latter and I would favour that opinion purely because she seems to know a bit more about her than me. Jen is a bit of a closed book though.

    The other issue of course is that the audience she is playing to is not really the likes of you and me. She is playing to middle America and feeding them a story about her personal life that her people think would be palatable to them of course. I expect they have people doing market research to find out exactly what that market wants her to be too. These people are all symbols, not just people when it comes down to it. And Oprah I would say is caught in the same bind too – I don’t think she is actually being that honest either!

    Reply
  129. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 27th, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    And what the blinkin’ hell has happened to my fan? Seriously where are these fans when you need them to bolster your fragile post-interaction-with-LurkeyLoo induced psychosis? Who’s gonna peel me a grape?! Oh and yeah not the blue M&M’s remember – this Kweane don’t eat no nasty colourings!

    Reply
  130. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    @Reality Check:
    This Gottleib girl is pretty awful based on some of the things she’s written. She wrote a cruel article about having this guy start emailing her and she thought he would be okay to date because ‘his handwriting didn’t look fat”. She met him and dated him a little and then got rid of him because he was simply ‘too fat’. She herself certainly doesn’t settle. I think the book is just some way to market herself and make some money. I’ve read other icky things but I can’t remember them off the top of my head. She’s just….ick. And the concept is …ick.

    It is certainly all too true that no woman should settle on a man just to have a man.

    The chemistry over common sense question is a good one. I read a good book—I think it was called “It IS your Parent’s Fault” (I know, but I was going through a tough year and was looking for any insight) and they make the interesting point that chemistry is actually you recognizing something in someone that you saw in one of your parents. If you are emotionally healthy, and had storybook parents, then you are just naturally chemically attracted to the nice guy. If you have unresolved issues—say—an alcoholic father—-you will repeat the cycle by always being mysteriously attracted to alcoholics. You’ll believe it’s chemistry but you are really just recognizing something you are familiar with already and then you try to fix whatever was wrong with the parental relationship in the romantic relationship.

    Reading that was a revolution to me. I would have sworn I wasn’t repeating any patterns and didn’t really think any negative thoughts about my parents. Yet I consistently found myself attracted only to alcoholics—just like my dad. I could find the alcoholic man even if he didn’t have a drink in his hand. I just felt that instant chemistry and surprise I would discover the guy drank way too much and too often.

    I had to step way back from using chemistry alone to partner with anyone. But that certainly doesn’t mean giving up and settling for some jerk. I had to figure out what was messed up within myself to begin to feel chemistry toward men who were good guys without drinking problems.

    Reply
  131. pickwick said on April 27th, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Interesting idea. I do keep wondering why she hasn’t just addressed some of this stuff, and I can’t really puzzle it out because she is very media-savvy and has no problem with publicity. People in Hollywood tend to get a reputation nowadays because of the internet. There is the website where people talk about how different celebs act at restaurant. You can see their concert demands on-line. You tend to get a sense of how someone really is. Like Sandra Bullock. Everyone really likes her. Nobody has a bad story to tell about her. She treats people well. I’ve heard nice things about Diane Sawyer. When someone is well-liked, you tend to hear the whisperings of good things. Jen could have really sailed away with the public support easily had she let down her guard. Something is just wrong somewhere because I don’t read those same ‘nice person’ stories about her.
    People talk about who is mean and nasty: like Ben Stiller who is supposed to be awful, or Lea Michele from Glee who is supposed to be an impossible diva.
    So I think after reading your post I am going go with you on this one and fall toward the idea that she has something she wants hidden—-who knows what. Mayer said nice things about her on his death tweets. I don’t know….

    Reply
  132. Keane Fan said on April 27th, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    @Reality Check:
    Dear Sir/Madam

    You’re trying to hard…I perceive that as the epitome of…

    Love you too!

    Reply
  133. Keane Fan said on April 27th, 2010 at 8:05 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I have to say I’m a bit dissapointed in your answer, Keane…I expected better from you …don’t you see by now that I’m not into debating the details…i just said that I “perceive” angelina in a certain way, based of course on my natural disposition and I believe that the same holds true for you…we all use our sixth sense when we first appraise a person, and it would take a lot of evidence, or sometimes just a minor detail to undo that first impression…I definetely find her 3rd world escapades funny and ultimatelly useless (I think), but I truly believe that she’s genuine…oops, I’m getting carried away, I have no insider info and no “research” to base my statements on, just my gut feeling…if she were to be my sister maybe I would hate the bitch, but otherwise, so far removed from my humble world, she is a person of interest, in a good way…

    …and now I think you deserve to tell you why I enjoy your posts here, you might be surprised….while I don’t care too much about the actual ideas put forward, I think you are articulate and witty..and I’ll leave it at that …you see, my first language is not English and you are a perfect example for me of colloquial language, your turn of phrase is interesting, etc

    Reply
  134. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 28th, 2010 at 6:45 am

    Hey Fan

    No I hadn’t picked up on what you are and aren’t interested in debating hun because – rather like others who need not be mentioned – you are slightly over-estimating the amount of attention I have paid to your posts so far. No offence meant to you whatsoever, I’m sure they were fascinating, it’s just that you are just one of very many commenters posting here and I perhaps don’t pay as much attention to yours as you do to mine.

    What I do remember though is that your language was also full of colloquialisms; I recall you referring to Kate as “passive-aggressive”, Patty Anne as a “red-neck” and telling me to “go girl!” – all definitely American colloquialisms and ones that are not even used much in places like the UK at all. So English being your first language or not, you are definitely an Americana my friend – that much was obvious from your first post. What was also obvious was that you have a great turn of phrase yourself, it was highly witty and confident – some might say arrogant and mocking even, but others would perceive you more indulgently. I would almost suspect you were a writer yourself and even someone who is well-versed in the world of the gossip blog, your turn of phrase was that impressive. You also referred to Ian in a way which sounded like he was familiar to you – as perhaps you also are to him – which was also interesting.

    From your post on this thread it appears that you would rather focus on the “perception” of Angelina Jolie rather than the reality of who she actually is, and I’m afraid there’s the rub. The commentary on this site has always been about exposing what Angelina actually IS rather than what she SEEMS or is perceived to be, so I’m not sure we would have any discussion to suit you. As you say, when Angelina does photocalls with refugees she “seems” to be genuine. Take a slightly closer look – for example by watching some video taken at that photocall (always such a giveaway for bad actresses like Angelina) – and you will see her deliberately and artificially turning on that bright smile or that concerned and sympathetic frown at the exact same time the cameraman says “Action!”. Look closely at the video of her kneeling by the bed of the boy with the amputated leg in Haiti and you will see her eyes flick stealthily away from the one she is trying to look so concerned about, to the one holding the video camera to check he is getting his shot and to make sure she is coming off nicely in it. If you watch video of her posing with Brad for pics at premieres you will also see how the whole thing is highly choreographed and when she attempts a move that is not prearranged, he will deftly block her and push her away from him (something which she tends to cover up with one of her “I’m so happy, desirable and successful” trademark over-the-top laughs). So you see, the very thing you are looking for here, a discussion of what Angelina does or does not “seem” to be according to a type of onlooker’s “sixth sense” as you describe it, played out with a witty turn of phrase and the odd colloquialism here or there is not really what you will find here. We tend to be more interested in interrogating how things “seem” to be and trying to uncover the actual reality behind the facade to tell the truth. So sorry to say, as much as I am always keen to recruit and foster a new “fan”, I’m not sure we can help you. Perhaps the best thing would be to discuss your perceptions of Angelina using witty dialogue on your own blog? Let me know what you decide anyway, I am never one to say sayonara to a fan so lightly. Ciao for now.

    Reply
  135. Reality Check said on April 28th, 2010 at 8:48 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    My thoughts exactly: self-promotion (on AJ’s part).

    Reply
  136. crouching tiger said on April 28th, 2010 at 8:51 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    keane, I still haven’t found that video Inglourious Basterd premiere. I’ve been looking all over YouTube and there are only video with interviews mostly. The vid about they posed for photographers, the only thing I found is the ones with pictures montage, so I found nothing basically. Anyone found it?

    Reply
  137. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 28th, 2010 at 9:19 am

    @crouching tiger:

    Yeah, it’s funny, when I googled Angelina Jolie for videos it was one of the first ones that came up. Curiously I now cannot find it either. I have a vague recollection of the site it was on so I will continue to look for it for you when I get a chance. I get the impression James is sat there with his ever-ready keyboard figures fully flexed ready to pick up that phone and pay that site to take down every vaguely negative video I can find though. That’s mass media censorship at it’s very worst folks. Seems like if you have enough money you can bury anything. You can’t bury people with ethics though, sadly for them!

    Reply
  138. lurkeyloo said on April 28th, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    Not me… you really have some deep rooted issues. I do not need to post as someone else, nor will I. You are such a freakshow. Take your “fabulous” meds. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  139. lurkeyloo said on April 28th, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    Yes, I do realize I am now that person. I have no problem taking you and your pint sized brain on…thanks! @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  140. lurkeyloo said on April 28th, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    Couldn’t manage what, sweetie? I only speak the truth. I would say it is a safe bet that your life is far from fab (no matter where you shop). You are a nasty and hateful person. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  141. lurkeyloo said on April 28th, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    Also, this is a blog and people leave COMMENTS on a blog…hence a blog. Get it? If people did not have any opinions or comments…what is the point? You certainly aren’t the brightest bulb. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  142. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 28th, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    Aw look at little Lurkey leaving me four love notes to return to! Thanks Lurkey!

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Reply
  143. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 28th, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    Hun you are doing exactly what you claim to abhor in me, pointlessly carrying on an argument and projecting insults because you just can’t bear to not have the final word – or in this case, four final words in fact! I noticed it last time you took me on and I had a little chuckle at you then too. I was like aw bless little Lurkey trying so hard to get the last word in. I could see you had quite a lot invested in it then, and you obviously still do! Do you realise it undermines your argument somewhat? Don’t worry, my pint-sized brain will let your pea-sized one have this one though – I am off to live my fabulous/non-fabulous life (depending on which one of us you ask!). Have fun with yours! Ha ha

    Reply
  144. lurkeyloo said on April 28th, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    I can go as long as you can, darling. You are also entertaining, as well as pointless. Sorry I didn’t get back to you until today…I didn’t spend my entire evening looking at Ianundercover.com (or “multi-tasking” as you put it)…therefore, I was responding to the three (or four) posts you directed my way overnight….guess that UNDERMINES your point, huh? Pot…meet kettle.

    Take care, pint-size….I’m sure we’ll tangle again. Enjoy all of the glamour in your life! @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  145. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 28th, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    Aha ha ha ha – you’re still going! I’m loving you! Keep it coming Lurkeylovely, keep it coming! That’s no problem at all that you didn’t get back to me sooner, I’m just glad that you did – AND HOW! Ha ha ha. So I am now “tiring” but also “entertaining” and “pointless” at the same time am I? Your message is getting more and more consistent babe, more and more! Oh and yes I am definitely multi-tasking babe, just finished up negotiating a great rate (the best I’ve ever got in fact) for a job later on this week (it has taken up most of today in fact), got a mean lamb rogan josh on the stove and am taking some time out of my hectic schedule to chat to you sweetie-pie! So tell me, what did you get up to today? (I feel like we are friends, practically lovers now!). Oh and so you’re telling me that you came back to post at me on four separate occasions while I was sleeping huh? Hm, that’s not just sweet, that’s hot! I’m getting a little sweaty under the collar. But I’m not exactly sure how that undermines my point hun, doesn’t it in fact reinforce it? I.e. you just can’t quit me or let anyone else have the last word to the point where you came back to post at me four time overnight?! Are you even sure what undermining means? Oh and I never said I didn’t like an argument, I love one in fact – I am always up for a heated debate! Oh and we are “tangling” together now are we? That thing I said about us being lovers – you do realise I was joking right? I don’t want another d situation on my hands here! Lol

    Reply
  146. Keane Fan said on April 29th, 2010 at 12:25 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    …why, thank you Keane, high praise indeed…English is not my first language, but I live in Ontario about 16 years now, originally from E Europe…and I’m no writer, no blogging, etc, actually I work in computers and most of the language I deal with daily is pretty dull, at home I speak my mother’s tongue, most of my friends are from back home, so you see, I’m getting my fixes where I can ….I get your gist about Ange but you see, while I call myself a fan, I’m not that invested, I would look at some photos, nice, or maybe read something at the check out line, done. I have no desire to start analysing those details you mentioned, now that I think of it I’ve never even seen a video from her trips, just pictures …should she prove publicly and irrevocably a two-timer I will just be dissapointed (mainly in myself) and loose interest fast…onto the next one….so you see, I cannot fathom, what’s in to you that angelina is not what she’s “perceived” to be, all this consumming effort…but I digress…about the connection to Ian- I guess it’s just our shared citizenship, and I watched that programme he was on here from the site…he was pathetic, the poor soul, my French is not that good, but the fact that he’s not able to use verb conjugations made it easy for me to understand him…no finesse whatsoever, believe me…

    Have a good night/morning

    I’ll be back ! (think Arnold accent, since we’re into linguistics )

    Reply
  147. Keane Fan said on April 29th, 2010 at 1:15 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Just saw this now, delicious! I’ll make sure I always pick out the blue ones when I present them to you !

    Reply
  148. lurkeyloo said on April 29th, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Good morning, lover! :) At least, it is mid-morning here in my world. I agree with you, this is becoming a bit intimate. haha!

    First, you seem to be stuck on the fact that I directed four posts at you yesterday…but I was merely responding to the three posts you directed at me. See? My point is, don’t get too flattered…or sweaty under the collar. Also, due to our time difference, I posted during the day…not in the middle of the night. I would either assume you were sleeping or on this blog (as usual).

    Let’s see…what did I get up to yesterday (besides being fabulous :) )? I enjoyed “the view”, of course! I really don’t feel compelled to put my personal activity on a gossip blog…but, hey, knock yourself out at it if it makes you feel better. (Congrats on the job and I hope the lamb was splendid, by the way) Part of my (consistent) point has been that one who leads such a glam life does not need to preach it to anyone who will listen.

    Honey (I hope I can call you that since you seem to have grown so fond of me), I have been nothing BUT consistent. I will, however, have to correct myself in telling you that you were “tiring”…for that I apoplogize. I am enjoying the banter. But, it would appear the same from your end, you flirt! haha! We both seem to have a problem with getting the last word in….your turn.

    You can’t quit me, baby! @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  149. Keane Fan said on April 29th, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    @lurkeyloo:
    Enjoyed your post, I ‘m becoming a fan ….Keane, don’t think that I’m deserting you, you’re still #1 in my heart, but there are conteders here
    Keep up teh good work

    Reply
  150. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 29th, 2010 at 5:51 pm

    @Keane Fan:

    Oh so you’re from Eastern Europe originally that’s interesting – which part? Can’t stop to chat for long now but I was just wondering why in your original post(s) you chose to call Kate passive-aggressive and Patty-Anne a red-neck and generally discussed the site and the posters on it in a very mocking and supercilious way? You had an impeccable grasp of the English language in that post and seemed to be addressing Ian as an equal and was looking down on us egit posters like we were beneath you. Now you claim you are just someone who lives in Canada and works with computers and your linguistic style has completely changed; now it is definitely not so clever, not so supercilious and not so mocking either – quite an about turn don’t you think? Was just wondering how you would explain this change because right now the explanation you are giving I am just not buying which is a shame because I always love to recruit a new fan, just ask Lurkey!

    Reply
  151. Keane Fan said on April 29th, 2010 at 11:56 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    ….permission to speak freely? ok, not sure why I’m doing this, I’m old enough to know that real communication between people with so different takes on reality is virtually impossible, but I’m in a “reach for your fellow human being” mood tonight…yes, I’m still all the things I said I am, maybe working in computers is somehow random, but as a new immigrant I found out that I needed to give up my former training and go for what would put food on the table…so how do I explain away my about turn and my faltering style? ..a combinations of factors, really…when I first arrived on this site I thought you all a bunch of nut cases (still do, with nuances), not because of your angelina hate, but the way you went about it – I won’t go into details as i know it won’t persuade you and I don’t need a lecture in return (or maybe I do? he he) -even then I singled you out but those were the early days still, hence my brief “introductory” note, mocking tone and all intended…I kept coming back, and I would wonder at how differently the human brains are wired and contemplating the philosophical side of it (Nietzsche came to mind, and no, i cannot hold my own if you want to expose me in that regard, I’m just a bits and pieces reader)…all these while having a good laugh, the entertaining value on this site is (used to be, when Ian and Angelina did their job properly) high…the pleading, the mocking, the frustrated, the preacher, the fantasies, the plots….and who is the driving force behind all that? that will be you dear Keane… I like to think myself of a generous nature, so I thought you deserved to know of my appreciation…so those were my subsequent posts…another reason for my slight change of tune..maybe I do mocking better than generous, or it is just my still limited English (compared to yours, for example) that gets exposed when I go longer, something along these lines…..what else…I didn’t catch the meaning on how I was addressing Ian as an equal, forgot what made you think that, anyway, let me tell you, I am pretty sure that all you guys are basically decent and law abiding citizens in RL, who work for a living and the fact that you come on this site in your spare time doesn’t really hurt anybody…Ian is another matter altogether, he’s just boring, uninspiring, ridiculous, pretentious, self serving…and the fact that he’s a liar as well is just secondary…so no, he’s not my equal, I’m much better than him, and so are you!…gotta go to bed now and dream a vampire story from my childhood ….nighty night..

    Reply
  152. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 30th, 2010 at 7:56 am

    Ok that’s cool but just remember that not every fellow human being you reach for necessarily wants to be reached out to. And what part of Eastern Europe were you from again?

    Reply
  153. lurkeyloo said on April 30th, 2010 at 11:36 am

    I think I love you. :) @Keane Fan:

    Reply
  154. Patty anne said on April 30th, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Keane do you realize that with the fan base you have aquired you could easily start your own successful blog? The hits would be enormous and the entertainment quality would be through the roof! I’m serious here now, and not mocking anyone……this is truly a fun read!! I envision all of you in an English field at dawn, mist conditions making visablitly low, so you are all milling about thrusting swords in practice for the final lunge. Parry and thrust!

    Reply
  155. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 30th, 2010 at 6:17 pm

    @lurkeyloo:

    Methinks you have found your perfect match Lurkey! Shame it’s not a real person but hey, anything is a start right? Lol

    Reply
  156. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 30th, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    @Patty anne:

    Ha ha – yeah I’ll get back to you on that when I do! And yes I will definitely be giving passive-aggressive pseudo-Eastern European in Canada computer-bot “Keane Fan” pride of place on my list of top contributors. How could I not when he/she (the former) has been so kind to all my friends? Lol

    Reply
  157. Keane Fan said on May 1st, 2010 at 2:30 am

    Came back for my expected lashing and what a pleasant surprise – love all around! ..Keane, don’t brush me off, I know you love me too (one needs to hope, right?)…and you were not paying enough attention to my post …sighs…your answer is there…ok, hint: towards the end…time for bed again…

    Reply
  158. Reality Check said on May 1st, 2010 at 8:46 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    Just for the record, Keane, I am from Eastern Europe and although I don’t mean to undermine you against your opponents, I don’t like your question. Even though it was put to someone else. You wouldn’t know about that while you were reading my posts, would you? I’ll take it as a compliment for my English.

    Do you see Eastern Europe as something lagging behind, I wonder? There is a remainder of the Cold War in what you said, but the Cold War came to an end more than 20 years ago, so I wish you and I started to live and talk to each other in 2010.

    I have also noticed that many an original English speaker have a serious problem building good sentences in English, using the correct punctuation or even spelling correctly. It’s because they take their mother tongue for granted and never make any effort to express themselves in writing as well as they should.

    Those of us who learn English as a second language usually make a lot more effort to present well-organized, polished thoughts on discussion boards. It’s because we don’t take the language for granted. Maybe we even respect it more than the original speakers.

    That said, I have a question: Still friends? :)

    RC

    Reply
  159. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 1st, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    @Reality Check:

    That wasn’t my point at all! You completely misunderstood what I was saying and in fact I am pretty sure you didn’t even know what I was actually referring to. And yes I know more than a few people from Eastern Europe! Every other person you speak to in the UK these days is from Eastern Europe, we have had a massive wave of immigration of people from those countries. It’s quite a well-documented thing. There are at least a handful of Polish delis within walking distance from my flat and the presence of Eastern Europeans in this country now is very accepted and – by most people – welcomed. Eastern Europeans are well-known for having better educations and language skills than the vast majority of people in this country. Yet they are prepared to do the low-skilled jobs that a lot of people in this country are not prepared to do because they can earn better money in them than doing the professions they trained for in their country of origin. And Eastern Europeans in more skilled professions such as building are reknowned for the quality of the work they do and for their strong work ethic. In general, I find the Eastern European immigrants in my area to be more polite, intelligent and well-spoken than the vast majority of native English people. Perhaps you should have taken the time to ask me whether I knew any people from Eastern Europe and what my opinion was of them before you leapt to accuse me of what was essentially racism. Thanks very much RC.

    Reply
  160. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 1st, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    @Keane Fan:

    Ya I did pick up on that Fan – it was just a tad clunky! The issue was not my lack of comprehension, it was just that I don’t believe you! Now you “go girl” and see if you can justify an “honourable mention” next time!

    Reply
  161. Keane Fan said on May 1st, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    @Reality Check:
    And I second you on this…you see, we can still find a common denominator…and I know, I got the “interesting!” reply too many times…but it’s also an education precess, so being antagonistic about it won’t help…and thinking of myself, I yet have to be 100% non prejudiced about other ethnicities..

    Reply
  162. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 1st, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    @Reality Check:

    Oh and if you wanted to find out what I was actually talking about, go back and find the first post written by Keane Fan and see what I mean. From the tone and language of the person posting I am pretty sure this is someone who knows Ian well and his (I think it is a man) intention was to mock the people posting here. Kate was referred to as “passive-aggressive Kate” and Patty-Anne as “red-neck Patty-Anne” and I was told that I should “go girl!” in as condescending and superior a manner as this person could muster. The superiority was further evident in that he felt he could give the three of us “honourable mentions” and chastise Ian – who he appears to perceive as an equal (hence my assumptions about his identity) – for not paying enough attention to his blog. Definitely not coming across as the humble Canadian citizen with Eastern European roots and an annonymous job working with computers that you now claim to be. Perhaps because I rumbled you with your first post who knows? I notice you are back the moment I post too, something which has happened on a quite frequent basis with many a bogus posters before. Coincidence? Who knows, and who cares really.

    Reply
  163. Keane Fan said on May 1st, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    This is really puzzling, Keane, I’m really at a loss as what strikes you false in my acknowledged identity, and I cannot envision the scenario where one of Ian’s acquaintances would impersonate an Eastern European living in Canada in order to shoot blanks on this site..but then again thinking at the investigative efforts around here, why not…did I strike close to home when I called Kate what I did? one would not need to know her personally, it was all on the Internet…and I’m a female, married, son, cat, the same as probably 90% of the posters here…the profile of EE immigrants in the UK is rather different than in Canada, people usually need a visa to get into this country and it doesn’t qualify as a quick temporary destination where to make a buck…and my history here is quite common I would say, we took advantage of the computer boom of the late 90′, it was one of the only industries where a new immigrant could get in rather easily, we were not visible enough to get a job in the government or not canadian enough to get into one of the strong (at that time) manufacturing unionized shops…gotta go now, bye

    Reply
  164. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on May 1st, 2010 at 7:28 pm

    @Keane Fan:

    Hun, first one: obsession with me. Second one: calling yourelf after me and describing me as your fan while clearly mocking me. Third: at pains to denigrate Ian and the other major contributors to this site while actively posting here with no obvious motivattion other than your supposed interest in sparring with me. Fourth: making an initial post which made you sound like a mocking, knowing, supercilious, arrogant cat and when immediately called out on it suddenly adopting an identity of quite a different sort. Fifth: you are quite clearly trying to take the p*ss out of me and I’m not sure why you were imagining that I would play along. Did you really think I was so vain that I would fall for your passive-aggressive attempts to both mock me and praise me at the same time? Haven’t you learnt anything by now?

    And well if you think Kate is “passive-aggressive” and Patty-Anne is a “red-neck” that is your prerogative, but I would hasten to point out that as they are both personal friends of mine your initial post immediately precluded you from any cyber buddydom on the interwebs with me. As you can see, I am just plain old aggressive-aggressive, and that’s the way it will always be. Find a new idol for your fandom and see ya around sunshine. Ta ra.

    Reply
  165. Keane Fan said on May 1st, 2010 at 9:38 pm

    Got it. Ok, let’s move on from this thread….see you, maybe

    Reply
  166. forex robot said on May 1st, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    Great information! I’ve been looking for something like this for a while now. Thanks!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2010
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Meta