Can this really be called an “exclusive?” Bullshit. This is Ian throwing us a bone and the next ten posts will be drivel about some show I’ve never seen as he tries to legitimize himself into a serious journalist.
who cares ? they have popped out babies, adopted, and even if they get married they are now boring and old news. they will only be really interesting when they part and have new partners. i would rather read about aniston and who her guy is and buy a mag again when they have a photo of her and a bio or adopted baby, at least she keeps us guessing. these two have pulled all the stunts available except sex in public or new partners. jmo
This story is no longer relevant Ian , has not been for days, was not when it was posted. What is – “Is Noah Levy being strong armed by the snake up there(I mean Mr.Ed of course), or is Bill the BG being sued?”
yes so where is your exclusive they are now getting married ?? is this the smoke screen that you put in January ?? or are you just a bullshitter IAN ??
So IUC posts the shocker, bombshell headline “Exclusive” – Is Angelina preggers?. Star magazine carried this same nonsense in last week’s issue. it has since been denied. The only “Exclusive” here is how excruciatingly lame these IUC totally non existent scoops are – and tired, talk about old news – recycling rubbish from last week’s Star mag. pathetic
crouching tigersaid on April 22nd, 2010 at 1:24 am
What’s exclusive about it? Ian. you’re not reporting anything, you’re throwing a question and a speculation.
Hey, can anyone explain why there are so many different tags about Angie and Brad.
There are “Brangelina” and “Brangie”. What’s the different?
There are “Angelina Jolie” and “Angie Jolie”.
It makes me difficult when I want to read old post by clicking tags. I have to click five tags to know every post about Angie and Brad, “Angelina Jolie”, “Angie Jolie”, “Brad Pitt”, “Brangelina”, and “Brangie”. And maybe there’s more. So it makes me confused.
"Talk Royalty with His Highness", March 5th, 8PM EST, 1AM GMT. Special Guest Noah Levy, Senior Editor In Touch Magazine.
Everybody please remind Ian to hit the Record Button Next Time
The Replay of "Talk Royalty with His Highness" with Special Guest Dawn Olsen is available at:
Click Here to get Alerted by Email for the Next IUCTV Show>
She already denied that through people mag. Case closed!
Replyeheheh Brangie is back
Replywho gives a rat’s ass….those two are such old news!!!!
Reply@lory:
Can this really be called an “exclusive?” Bullshit. This is Ian throwing us a bone and the next ten posts will be drivel about some show I’ve never seen as he tries to legitimize himself into a serious journalist.
ReplyI don’t think she is. I believe the “strained relationship” story. Until Brad shaves, there is no way they are being intimate!
ReplyFreud would be all OVER that image. Symbolical on three levels…wow!!!!!!
Reply@borderline…line, (feels odd writing to my self)…May I add and Carl Jung!!!!!
ReplyIf she’s pregnant, then Ian’s the father.
ReplyIf she’s pregnant, I can only guarantee it wasn’t me.
Ian I thought this would be of more interest to you – Cirque du Soleil will be covering Michael Jackson songs:
Replyhttp://www.tmz.com/2010/04/20/michael-jackson-cirque-du-soleil-circus-las-vegas-show-estate-john-branca/
doubt it.
more importantly, Ted Casablanca outed J. Travolta:
Replyhttp://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b176665_blind_vice_seymour_wants_privacy_padded.html
@mooki:
ReplyMooki – I agree that this blind has JT written all over it, but where do you get off saying Ted outed him? He did no such thing.
who cares ? they have popped out babies, adopted, and even if they get married they are now boring and old news. they will only be really interesting when they part and have new partners. i would rather read about aniston and who her guy is and buy a mag again when they have a photo of her and a bio or adopted baby, at least she keeps us guessing. these two have pulled all the stunts available except sex in public or new partners. jmo
ReplyI agree jan/sa. Ian do you have anything on Jennifer ? A new guy…an old love…a baby?
ReplyDefinitely you.
ReplyIf she is preggers – I bet Brad is NOT the father!
ReplyYes, and Johnny Depp is the baby-daddy!
ReplyThis story is no longer relevant Ian , has not been for days, was not when it was posted. What is – “Is Noah Levy being strong armed by the snake up there(I mean Mr.Ed of course), or is Bill the BG being sued?”
Replyyes so where is your exclusive they are now getting married ?? is this the smoke screen that you put in January ?? or are you just a bullshitter IAN ??
ReplySo IUC posts the shocker, bombshell headline “Exclusive” – Is Angelina preggers?. Star magazine carried this same nonsense in last week’s issue. it has since been denied. The only “Exclusive” here is how excruciatingly lame these IUC totally non existent scoops are – and tired, talk about old news – recycling rubbish from last week’s Star mag. pathetic
ReplyWhat’s exclusive about it? Ian. you’re not reporting anything, you’re throwing a question and a speculation.
Hey, can anyone explain why there are so many different tags about Angie and Brad.
ReplyThere are “Brangelina” and “Brangie”. What’s the different?
There are “Angelina Jolie” and “Angie Jolie”.
It makes me difficult when I want to read old post by clicking tags. I have to click five tags to know every post about Angie and Brad, “Angelina Jolie”, “Angie Jolie”, “Brad Pitt”, “Brangelina”, and “Brangie”. And maybe there’s more. So it makes me confused.
Did she just get back together with her father??? Hmmmmm…its all in the timing!
Reply@Tamara:
look at the first paragraph of the BI, he references T. Cruise and $cientology.
Reply