IUC World Exclusive: Sex Tape Could Ruin Bullock’s Career

Posted on April 2nd, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

sandra-bullock-jesse-james-attackIUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James smearing feces on Bullock’s upper lip during various types of anal sex, lots of profanity hurled from both parties, and a leather clad James, sporting a Hitler moustache with brown hat with a swastika, ramming a handcuffed Bullock’s asshole with a shotgun in his left hand. This in from a close friend of the couple who has been in contact with both parties. Developing…

  1. I'm on the bidet said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:00 am

    And worst of all, they didn’t tip the waitress at the Denny’s restaurant where they did this when they were done!

    I’m flummoxed – I find this impossible to believe without seeing it on video, yet on the other hand there is no way I want to see a video of this . . .

    Happy Easter everybody!

    Reply
  2. borgqueen said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:06 am

    What Sandra did in the privacy of her own home WITH HER HUSBAND and within the confines of marriage is truly her business and no one else’s. If that Pig Jesse James releases the tape then he is forever confirmed low down dirty trick. I do have problem with these skanks (Paris, Kim, and the rest of that ilk) that have sextapes and become famous for it. But a sextape made while married is really a private matter.

    Reply
  3. lurkeyloo said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:09 am

    Agreed…and boo to you Ian for dragging her through the mud even more. Don’t you think she deserves a little better, Ian? I mean, for Christ’s sake, she just caught her spouse cheating and it’s all over the media. Isn’t that enough to deal with??? @borgqueen:

    Reply
  4. purdy said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:23 am

    Uh. I wasn’t quite ready for something like this when I jumped over to this website. Yikes. (And I was just eating a little breakfast at that.)

    Reply
  5. Pattyanne said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:39 am

    Shame on you Ian. A very tasteless topic, totally inappropriate under the circumstances. borgqueen and lurkeyloo explained the why very clearly.

    Reply
  6. Jalyn said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:47 am

    kick ‘em while they’re down huh ian??

    this is just wrong!

    Reply
  7. Tinkuy said on April 2nd, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    TMI — Ian is on par with Perez Hilton.

    Reply
  8. Tamara said on April 2nd, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    Well, Im just glad to see that everyone here has the exact same reaction as I do about this post, I am not going to comment on it at all except to say Bravo! to all the IUC posters!!

    Reply
  9. too curious said on April 2nd, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    I agree with the others above. If this tape exists it is the private business of Sandra & Jesse.

    Ruin her career? No, don’t think so.

    Reply
  10. pretty pretty said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    Just looking at those other women you can tell Jesse is into some nasty stuff.

    Reply
  11. P said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    Oh c’mon, ladies. If this post were about AJ, you’d be all over it. You’re here for gossip, and that’s exactly what Ian is giving you. You don’t get to pick and choose when it comes to gossip and Hollywood. And *IF* this turns out to be true, it is relevant in that SB had to have had at least some idea of who her husband really was.

    Reply
  12. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    My thoughts:

    1) WOW! I wouldn’t believe it if he hadn’t described it in such detail. If it didn’t exist, I would think he would have just described it as a general sex-tape. Still, I’m a little skeptical.

    2) If it does exist, IDK if Jesse will release it. For whatever reason (maybe he really does care for Sandra), he seems to really want to repair the damage he’s done to his marriage.

    3) Again, this is what Ian does. This is no worse than anything he’s said about Angie. Just because we don’t like Angie but we like Sandra doesn’t mean that he shouldn’t do his job for one and not the other, although I would prefer if there was a bigger story here than those two having a wild sex-life and Jesse being a sex-addicted douche.

    4) Ian could have used a better choice of language, but this is his blog.

    5) Sandra could face some backlash if she’s into the whole Nazi fetish thing. That’s all I can see as far as a sex-tape being damaging to her. And maybe that’s the deeper story here, if there is one, that America’s sweetheart who made Crash and The Blind Side is a closet Nazi sympathizer/white-supremacist???

    Reply
  13. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    @P:
    Totally agree! 100%!

    Reply
  14. inOttawa said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    I find this one hard to believe… it’s pretty “out there”!! The good thing is you did deliver on the “… developing” so that is a plus! :)

    Reply
  15. pretty pretty said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:15 pm

    Ian I think this is a bit too convenient,Sandra wouldn’t be crazy enough to be filmed like that sounds like a sick joke Ian, hitler moustache….please
    You should also note that probably most people who read this are women who like Sandra & this S*** is
    VERY degrading April fools day was 2 days ago you sick F***

    Reply
  16. P said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    @Lauren:

    I think we’re going to be in the minority here. ;o)

    Reply
  17. lurkeyloo said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    No offense to you, P, but Angelina and Sandra are on totally different levels. You are right, though…gossip is gossip and we shouldn’t pick and choose. It just doesn’t seem fair to drag someone through the mud when they didn’t have a choice in what is happening….Angelina made her bed and deserves the mud-slinging (just my opinion). @P:

    Reply
  18. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    OT: I’d really like to know what you all’s reaction would be if this same thing had happened to Julia Roberts??? What if she’d just won another Oscar, then her it came out that her husband was cheating with multiple women, and that a kinky sex-tape starring the two possibly exists?

    Reply
  19. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    @P:
    Yeah, I’m pretty much betting on that.

    Reply
  20. P said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:37 pm

    @lurkeyloo:
    None taken. I understand your point of view, but I just don’t agree. I don’t know Sandra nor Angelina personally. My opinions are based on their carefully crafted public images and gossip sites. Obviously Angie has been more publicly distasteful, making it easier for all of us to believe the most vile things about her. I really do feel for Sandra, but I have to admit that if it is true that he had multiple affairs, has a nazi fetish, paid out a large sum of money on a sexual harassment suit, and may have engaged in dog fighting (not sure if that claim has been substantiated) that I find it very hard to believe that Sandra had absolutely no idea about what type of person he was. In that case either she did know or their marriage was a sham, IMO.

    Reply
  21. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    @P:
    Wow, you’re like my brain twin. I’ve been saying this for, what, two weeks now. We are def. in the minority, though.

    Reply
  22. lurkeyloo said on April 2nd, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    Agreed…she had to have had at least some idea as to the type of person he was (even prior to the marriage). Maybe she chose not to “see” what type of person he was in spite of all the red flags….God, knows it has happened to me…bit me on the rear in the long run but, can’t say I didn’t see it coming. :o ) @P:

    Reply
  23. sinker said on April 2nd, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    well, yesterday was April Fool’s Day — maybe Ian’s idea of a joke.

    Reply
  24. tess said on April 2nd, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    Angelina is the new Joan Crawford,those kids look so sad it’s really starting to show.
    Remember this person:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZtRhF8YukA

    Reply
  25. Chris from France said on April 2nd, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    @P:
    if he really was into all those things i assume his ex would have used it in the custody battle. JMO.
    i’m not a fan of Bullock, so i have no point defending her (even if i find awful going through what she’s living now) but i find these affirmations soooo ridiculous i don’t believe it at all !!!

    Reply
  26. P said on April 2nd, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    @Chris from France:

    Maybe, but Jesse had a lot of stuff on his ex-wife anyway, and if she took part in that as well, it wouldn’t have done her any favors, especially considering her porn/drug/prison past. At this point, I don’t believe that this true, but I have wondered if Sandra did have some sort of feeling about Jesse’s indiscretions.

    Reply
  27. Molly said on April 2nd, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    America’s sweetheart is a disgusting, overrateted, Nazi anal slut! Good for you Ian letting all the kissups know what she is really like.

    Reply
  28. Chris from France said on April 2nd, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @P:
    well you know what they say, wives are the last to know. she looked too happy and in love to be in an open relationship if you ask me. i don’t imagine people in that kind of marriage be really deeply attached to each other. but i can be wrong, i don’t know any straight couple in an open relationship so it’s how i imagine it.

    Reply
  29. Jimmy Jimerino said on April 2nd, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    Wanna bet Jesse James commits suicide with the shitty shotgun in his mouth?

    Reply
  30. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @P:

    Yep I agree – the moment I saw that picture of him making the Nazi salute I felt that this could be curtains for her career. My first instinct was that this was a sham relationship and she didn’t know him that well at all, and he was banging who he liked because he wasn’t in reality attached to her. But it did beg the question, why if Sandra just wanted a nice convenient beard to conceal her real sexuality would she choose a pig like Jesse when there were probably about a million less risky candidates available to her? So if we are now thinking that this was a genuine relationship to some extent then the photo of him making that Nazi salute and the fact that he was banging a stripper who is a white supremacist and gets photographed wearing an armband with a swastika on it, rings immediate alarm bells to me. I just cannot believe that the man held such extreme views and she knew absolutely nothing about it, no way. And now we are hearing that she might have been involved in the same sexual fetish that Jesse obviously enjoys herself, well this is very bad news for Sandra, it really is. I think the word “curtains” is a bit of an understatement when it comes to describing the affect this might have on her career. It is interesting to note though that the NOTW did a story not so long ago on Max Mosley (F1 boss and grand-son of notorious Nazi sympathiser Oswald Mosley) engaging in orgies with prostitutes who were dressed in the distinctive garments of Jewish prisoners of wars in the death camps. It was argued that Max was a Nazi sympathiser just like his father. He launched a legal case against the NOTW, not for libel, but for invading his privacy, and won. He did however argue that his predilection for S&M had nothing whatsoever to do with Nazism. If this tape does exist, I’m not sure Sandra would be able to make this case. Plus, privacy laws are much stricter in the UK than they are the US. Either way, this is not looking good for Sandra, not at all. How ironic that she just won an Oscar too. The timing couldn’t have been any worse. Or maybe it was the Oscar which suddenly made Bombshell McGee’s story more marketable? I bet Sandra will rue the day she won that Oscar sadly.

    Reply
  31. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Sorry that meant to say “son of Oswald Moseley”.

    Reply
  32. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    I have to say that the fact that he paid for the strippers on her credit card is pretty incriminating as well. I mean, what further evidence do we need really that she knew about it and condoned it? I was reading a story on DListed yesterday about how the McGee woman had a foursome with Jesse and another couple. I’m sorry ladies but I’m going to give this story about another 5 seconds before it comes out that Sandra was involved with these women too. If she can make a tape like that – and I don’t think Ian would make up something that far-fetched and frankly gross – then I’m thinking having sex with these women too would not be a big deal for her. Either way, not looking good for her career, not at all.

    Reply
  33. Togi said on April 2nd, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    Ian, I think this is a really BAD post! Booo.

    Reply
  34. Lori Ann said on April 2nd, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    I don’t believe because Jesse would NEVER have gone into rehab if this was out there —just a threat to Sandra and he would forever do anything he wanted . I am not saying that there is not a tape, but I bet that it is not Sandy and Jesse.

    Reply
  35. Lulz said on April 2nd, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    Its ok to ruin Jesse but not Sandra? I hope there is a tape and it does get released it will just show how fucked up Americas sweetheart Sandra really is. Thats Hollywood for you.

    Reply
  36. too curious said on April 2nd, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    You actually think she sees her credit card bills? I can pretty much guarantee someone else is in charge of the paying the bills.

    I used to work at a beer company and someone in accounting there told me that all strip club charges are billed under fake and reasonable sounding names. She knew because sales people were actually expected to go to the strip clubs and such at times since they were customers of the company.

    Reply
  37. too curious said on April 2nd, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    Keane, sorry that came off rude and it was intended as amused. Just saying that it is doubtful she saw the bills.
    Now her accountant may have suspected something…

    Reply
  38. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    @too curious:

    Don’t worry hun, I know you didn’t mean it like that! And, well, I think she probably would see her credit card bills from time to time yes. Celebrities have people to do a lot of stuff for them but one they do still tend to know things like how much money they have in the bank, what they’re being paid for a particular job and how much money is being charged to their credit card every month. If Jesse was spending thousands of dollars on strippers every month I have a feeling she would have picked up on that eventually. And Sandra is no dumb actress, she is a producer of movies. When you do something like that you have to know what is going on with the finances, excatly what is coming in and going out, that is the job. Producers have to be extremely financially savvy people, they need to keep an eye on every penny that is being spent to make sure the project comes in on budget. I just can’t imagine someone who deals with that kind of financial detail on a daily basis would never look at her credit card bill or wonder where all those thousands of dollars were going now and again. And I suspect that there is a lot to this story that we do not yet know but Ian clearly does and he is revealing what he knows bit by bit. What would be the point of saying JJ paid for his hookers on her credit card unless there was more to it? I think what Ian is suggesting is that she knew about it and was happy to pay for it. Like the Bombshell McGee character said – they had a contract.

    By the way, can I just ask if anyone else can understand what on earth Sandra (or any of these other women) ever saw in that man in the first place? You could find his like in any greasy spoon cafe or truck-stop the length and breadth of the western world I would have thought. Why on earth did so many women want to sleep with him? He just makes me go bleurghh!

    Reply
  39. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 6:13 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    That second sentence made no sense, sorry pulled my back yesterday and have been in agony ever since. Am sure you can figure out what I was trying to say though!

    Reply
  40. Tamara said on April 2nd, 2010 at 6:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I have to respectfully disagree Keane – Ian has come out with ALOT of stuff and called it developing and then never addressed it again, good or bad. He has told us a lot of stuff that never came to light that we took as truth because he told us so. At this point there are more stories that Ian told us that didn’t come true than actually did, and Ian if your reading this you know exactly what Im talking about. We have asked you for some kind of “settlement” on lots of your posts but you have never responded to any of them. I am sticking to my story that I don’t care whether this story is true or not, IMO this is their business and theirs only and there isn’t one single person on this site who deserves to know the truth and thats because this couple has NEVER courted the publicity they have never used the press to enhance their relationship, they have kept private and IMO what two people or three or four want to do in the privacy of their own lives is entirely up to them and not any of our business. And before you blast me for being overly critical of all things AJ and BP that is precisely because they have used the press shamefully to promote their very existence – there is a BIG difference.

    Reply
  41. Tinkuy said on April 2nd, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    Nicolas Cage is an excellent example of a celebrity who didn’t pay much attention to his bills or cash outflow.

    Reply
  42. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 6:32 pm

    @Tamara:

    I know Tam, but I think it is different on this occasion. I think making a post on the fact that JJ used SB’s crredit card to pay for the strippers and then following up with something as graphic as this means that there was something being implied there which Ian either can’t or won’t yet say. To be honest though I think the credit card detail is a bit academic in the light of this (and I suspect other forthcoming) stories.

    I agree with you though that I have never wished this couple ill-will because franky I don’t know the first thing about them and like you say they have always conducted their relationship privately. I am beginning to wonder now whether there might be a very good reason for this and SB was in fact concerned about keeping her private life and marriage as far away from prying eyes as humanly possible. Just my guess and just my opinion but I think the signs are not looking too good here.

    Reply
  43. Pattyanne said on April 2nd, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    I agree with you on this Tam, in fact I’m still waiting for the final developement on the Sudanese model and Brad’s love child as told to Ian via the sister of the Sudanese he says he dated. Should be simple to give us a “development” on that one at least.

    As to what sort of sexual activities a married couple shares in private, it’s none of my business. True, Angie has made a career of flaunting her sexuality, bi-sexuality, S & M, and so on in great detail to the press. She flaunted her sexuality during her first pregnancy to a then still married man saying Brad loved sex with a pregnant woman (WTF??) They opened the door to the world to view them in every iota of their existance. In fact they use the media for their own purposes such as selling their babies photos. No right to privacy there imo. BUT….Sandra has always been a private, well respected woman. She’s interacted with numerous average joe and janes across the US in her travels by motor home with hubby Jesse and their dogs. I don’t care if they have a rotating bed with merry-g0-round music playing while he whips her and pours whipped cream on her body…it’s their business. Ian could have waited until this “close friend of the couple who has been in contact with both parties” mentioned the photo taken of Jesse in Nazi gear to post a thread. But to post such personal details about a couple’s sex life? How does that affect anyone other then them? If Jesse or Sandra isn’t your source on this story, then it’s not a story to be posted. I fail to understand how any “friend” of the couple could say this ALLEGED tape means Jesse “has the goods” on his wife. Jesse cheating and getting caught is a story, the bimbos coming out are a story, but to venture to drag Sandra down as the perpetrator of a heinous act is Bull Hockey.
    Also, as Noah has published In Touch stating Angie laughs as her children cry, she refers to Brad’s family as the simple people, she still has kinky sex with her ex…………..WHY wasn’t there a discussion on this? Especially if , as you said, Bill The Bodyguard mentioned in InTouch is the same source you quoted in the book? Wouldn’t it have been a simple matter to contact “Bill” again to ask him to give you a followup since he outed Jolie to In Touch? ……Developing@Tamara:

    Reply
  44. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    I told yall the Blind Side was racist. LMAO!! FECES, Really? How many types of anal sex are there? There’s more than one type? Maybe it was just chocolate? Yeesh! Wow. You can take a Bullock out of Germany but you can’t take the Germany out of a Bullock.

    Reply
  45. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:06 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    Ha ha – get you with your “excellent examples” James – you are hysterical! By the way, how do you know that Nicolas Cage did not keep a close enough eye on his bills? It may be that he knew what trouble he was getting into but just couldn’t stop himself – it’s called being a spendaholic. A lot of celebs are guilty of that, doesn’t mean to say they don’t know where the money’s going though.

    By the way, love the way you’re back the moment I stop posting – and trying to argue against something I’ve said too – how very unusual!

    Reply
  46. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:15 pm

    @ Pattyanne

    If you want to keep you’re sex life private don’t tape it. Wow, doo-doo and shotguns. Mr. Halperin, what will they think of next.
    P.S. Anybody else think Julia Roberts is behind this story or Jolie. Jealous,jealous ladies. LOL!

    Reply
  47. Pattyanne said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    KvK, to quote your post, “If you want to keep you’re sex life private don’t tape it”, in that train of logic, why then have sex with your spouse at all? Therefore eleminating any possible risk of exposure. And might I add that for someone who is so quick to call “racist”, you certainly showed your prejudice with your comment re: Sandy and Germany. As for Blindside the film being racist, it is based upon a true story…..real events, not fabricated with any bias in mind. @Kramer Vs. Kramer:

    Reply
  48. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:25 pm

    I don’t know why but I just feel like skattin’-Bow-wow-su/peewow-skat-skat-zippy-do-wow-wow-dat-da-do-wow-zoo-baaaa!!! Hmmm, I wonder what their safe word is?

    Reply
  49. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    @Pattyanne

    Um,no just don’t do poop tricks on tape. As for my German comment,if you’re into Nazi sex,shotgun, and shat and you happen to be German, I’m just not shocked. And yes the Blind Side is racist, why else do think so many rednecks ate that shit up.

    Reply
  50. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:51 pm

    News of this alleged sex tape would explain Sandy’s little visit to her Billionaire friend the other night. That tape would fetch a steep price.

    I hope this isn’t true.

    Reply
  51. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    Maybe I don’t understand. If you don’t like the site or don’t appreciate it, think Ian posts bullshit stories, or don’t like the gossip he puts up, why frequent here? It’s basically the same as a loon coming here on a daily basis. What’s in it for you?

    Reply
  52. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 2nd, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:

    I’d just like to point out at this juncture that my Great-Grandmother had a German maiden name and funny enough it didn’t make me turn out to be a racist. In fact I only found out about the German heritage a couple of years or two ago so I didn’t even know I was supposed to be one. Night all!

    Reply
  53. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 2nd, 2010 at 8:03 pm

    and Fangie laughed as they cried…

    Reply
  54. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 2nd, 2010 at 8:06 pm

    Well I guess Keane then that would make you the Good German. Tally ho!

    Reply
  55. Tamara said on April 2nd, 2010 at 8:55 pm

    @Lauren:
    LOL I know……pathetic isn’t it? hahaha I think I’m going to form the First IUC Wives Club………Calliing LadyBert, Backalleyknees, LOGD and all you other first IUC wives………lol

    Reply
  56. Pattyanne said on April 2nd, 2010 at 9:08 pm

    Psssssssst Tamara, I think someone needs to click on “View Older Posts” from about a year or more ago to current before she acts room hostess don’t you?@Tamara:

    Reply
  57. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Problem?

    Reply
  58. Tinkuy said on April 2nd, 2010 at 9:46 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    STFU

    Reply
  59. Tamara said on April 2nd, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    @Lauren:
    haha Lauren you are so funny. I picture you with a wide eyed baby blue stare with toes pointed inward gesturing to yourself and saying Who? What? Not little ole me? How very What Ever Happened to Baby Jane of you – Im impressed Bette, I mean Lauren.

    Reply
  60. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 10:10 pm

    @Tamara:
    Haha?

    I was seriously asking a question, though. For the past week, I’ve seen a lot of comments from various people complaining about the site, yet they are still commenting multiple times on every post. It’s an open question to all of those who say they don’t like the site, Ian’s a hack, it’s boring, blah blah blah. Why keep coming back?

    And if you or Pattyanne or anyone else has a problem with my question, my suggestion would be to ignore it.

    So, problem?

    Reply
  61. I'm on the bidet said on April 2nd, 2010 at 10:55 pm

    I have to agree with the “don’t shoot the messenger” sentiments expressed here; no matter how disappointing or distasteful I find the message to be. As I’ve said elsewhere on the site (not that I expect anyone takes notes on my comments . . . lol), we need credible, independent, non-corporate sources of information on celebrities, as celebrities seem to wield a remarkable influence on culture. Ian is one of those sources, and may be the best one there is in the game today. Note that Ian pierced Scientology long before others would take them on (CNN is just now getting around to it) and that while Ian could have easily made up trash to boost sales of his Michael Jackson and Brangelina books, he didn’t, in favor of solid journalism. When Ian goes off to make movies, who are you going to get your credible information from, Ted Casablanca? Yeah, right!

    Do I enjoy reading these things about SB? No. Do I want to believe them? Oh, hell no. Is Ian on ‘Team Jesse’ when it comes to this story? I very much doubt it. This is what he turned up, and even if it proves to be a fabrication on the part of the source, it is interesting to know that a source close to the story is willing to say such things. It is fair, of course, to hold Ian accountable to his own standards and journalistic credo, but let’s not condemn him for reporting what he hears, nor assume he publishes items frivolously (he bears a lot of risk personally for what he prints, while we bear no risk for reading what he prints). By all means, critique information you get – damn few people seem to do it these days – but let’s not slam Ian for putting it out there because its not nice to SB.

    Just one person’s opinion . . . IOTB

    Reply
  62. Tamara said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    @Lauren:
    Well, Lauren see, the thing is, I have good reason to question Ian right now, his story choices, his closure, his loyalty ad nauseum, so please Lauren, you can stop questioning my integrity as regards IUC – I have paid my dues and deserve to say whatever I want to so thats how it stands really…problem??

    Reply
  63. Lauren said on April 2nd, 2010 at 11:35 pm

    I never had a problem, or anything against you. What I had was a question that you clearly felt pertained to you as you were the only one who responded to it. It didn’t say @Tamara; it said nothing about Tamara. If you have a personal problem with Ian, that’s none of my business. That’s not what I asked about. What I asked was why would anyone who doesn’t believe Ian or who doesn’t like or appreciate his posts keep coming back.

    I’m not disrespectful to anyone who’s not disrespectful to me, nor do I (generally) intend to be offensive. In fact, I go over my comments and reword things to try not to be. So, if my question personally offends you, you can always ignore them like I suggested and like others have done. However, I don’t feel the need to have to be here for any particular amount of time before I feel I’m allowed to say whatever I want. Therefore, my question stands. So, if you have anymore problems with ME, then feel free to take them up with ME, or ignore me. If you don’t have any problems with me, then lets continue to trade thoughts and opinions about the discussion points. I’m quite fond of what most of the people here have to say.

    Reply
  64. alif said on April 3rd, 2010 at 3:40 am

    Ian, there’s at least two tell-all books in our big, downtown library.
    Believe you me, there’s much worse stuff in them than what you reported about
    SB. And the guilty parties are heavy hitters in the industry.

    I”m not condoning the tape. I cannot understand why they make ‘em at all! I just hope the kids don’t find out about it.

    Re: the nazi brouhaha. It seems like yesterday that Mel Gibson was hit from all sides for his drunken rant. (That was suspiciously reported almost as soon as it happened; like a police officer called TMZ even while the incident was in progress.) jmo!
    Also, since “Inglorious Basterds” has rec’d so much attention and was a boxoffice hit, nazis are back in the spotlight. No doubt it will trickle down to non-celebrities who idolize celebs.

    Sandra Bullock is ranked #1 at the boxoffice; so it would be to the benefit of the industry to cover this up.
    I never was a fan, but that’s because, like so many educated minority persons, I hated “Crash!”

    Reply
  65. Yorkshire Girl said on April 3rd, 2010 at 5:59 am

    @Tamara:

    I agree. I think that celebrities who are not media whores a la Jolie and Pitt do deserve a modicum of privacy. What goes on behind closed doors should remain private. It’s when politicians and actors etc are hypocritical and try to portray themselves in a certain light that has no reflection on their true character or values that is irritating to me personally. Also I dislike it when certain celebrities and public figures try and pick and choose when they want privacy and control the media. I know that sounds like double standards, and it probably is… i.e. I only like to hear awful things about people I dislike….but isn’t that human nature?

    Good luck to SB she seems like a nice person, regardless of her sexual preferences, straight, bi, gay or her sexual peccadilloes and since when did S&M or anal sex make you a neo-Nazi?

    And to Lauren, you may not want to sound offensive but when you put ME in capital letters like that, it does come across as being aggressive. Just like you have the right to your opinion and expressed it raising your question (that you don’t know why people come to the blog if they don’t like it etc.) Tamara and Pattyanne et al are also within their rights to express their thoughts and to also pose questions if they feel like it.

    I think that is one of the best things about this blog, is that people don’t blindly follow and believe everything that is posted and question it. This is not Just Jared. I really dislike Brangelina, but I don’t think some of the things Ian has written are true. I think the entire Sudanese triangle is not true, but I am open to being proved wrong, I hope I am proved wrong.

    Ian is not infallible and at the end of the day he is a journalist. No offence Ian, some of the best people I know are.

    Anyway peace to all. And Happy Easter Holidays Y’all!

    Reply
  66. inOttawa said on April 3rd, 2010 at 8:59 am

    Thanks. I think that is the perfect perspective to have on this!! @I’m on the bidet:

    Reply
  67. Tamara said on April 3rd, 2010 at 10:21 am

    @alif:
    alif – I’m not a minority per se and I hated Crash too!! Really hated it, and I didn’t like SB’s character at all either. I guess the reason I didn’t like it was because it made me so uncomfotable so in that regard I think the movie was a success! But for entertainment value I found it lacking for sure. Im sure you’ve got an entirely different perspective on it though.

    Reply
  68. Lauren said on April 3rd, 2010 at 10:37 am

    @Yorkshire Girl:
    I don’t mind being aggressive; being offensive is not my intention. Their was a reason for the “ME” in my last comment. If I pose a question, and two people respond to it in a joking “Who does she think she is?” manner, than it appears that they have a problem with my question. And if that is the case, then I want them to feel free to address ME directly instead of talking about “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane.”

    I never said anything about Tamara and Pattyanne needing to shut-up and swallow everything Ian says as the God-given truth. In fact, I said that I was skeptical of this story. Hell, I’m skeptical of most stories, but I still like to talk about them because they’re interesting and could very-well be true. I asked the question because, as I said, there are people who’ve been trashing the site all week, but I still see their names multiple times on all the recent posts. So I was interested in why anyone would want to come back to someplace they don’t like. Tamara and Pattyanne responded to my question as if they had a problem with my right to express that particular opinion.

    As far as I’m concerned, my question still stands. If it offends you, do like most ppl. and ignore it. I don’t care if anyone answers it or not, I can’t force them. I was just interested is all. I make it a conscious effort to stay away from sites I don’t like or stop liking after a while, so it was a genuine question.

    Reply
  69. Lauren said on April 3rd, 2010 at 10:58 am

    @Yorkshire Girl:
    Just to clarify, my question was not aimed at people who don’t like this particular post or think it is distasteful and degrading. That’s their opinion, and I agree, they have the right to express that (though I don’t think Ian should be beat up and called names for doing his job).

    I was asking about people who have been trashing the site, Ian, the stories, the commenters, etc… all week, but who continue to read and participate. If you think so lowly of a place, why come back?

    Reply
  70. Mnique said on April 3rd, 2010 at 11:00 am

    I am skeptical.
    However, all women dating bad boys do so because of the wild great sex.
    I only hope they do things for the right reasons. If they decide to stay together I hope it is for love and not for protecting a career.

    Reply
  71. Tamara said on April 3rd, 2010 at 11:46 am

    @Lauren:
    Ah Lauren – just drop it already. There’s a lot of water under the bridge is all I’m saying. And I recognize your comments as passive/aggressive so it doesn’t do to play the Aw Shucks role.

    Reply
  72. Lauren said on April 3rd, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    @Tamara:
    I don’t do passive-aggressive. Nobody played the ah shucks role. I asked a question. You responded. I asked if you had a problem with me because I’m more than willing to take care of it. Again, nobody addressed Tamara. You aren’t the only one commenting. And again, if you have an issue with me, there’s no need to @Lauren. Ignore me, as I’m not directing anything towards you. Issue dropped.

    Reply
  73. LOL said on April 3rd, 2010 at 12:28 pm

    MADE UP busshit.

    Reply
  74. Pattyanne said on April 3rd, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    I see the newest edition of In Touch magazine is out with Bill The Bodyguard’s statements about the Jolie-Pitt household. It seems to be more of a House Of Horrors to me. Really good read too, lots of interesting dish on Jolie, including her , eh hem, locked door exersizing for hours until she passes out. I think the word “exersizing” is a less offensive way of describing what she is actually doing. LOL. Ian, remember back in March, 2009 when the Associate Editor of In Touch, Noah Levy was on your live Talk Royalty program…..maybe you could schedule another with Noan and Bill The Bodyguard. Should be a good show. Also, do you have any further updates from your developing story on the break-up of Brangelina? The article makes it sound as if it may be imminent, especially as IT is Brad’s outlet, as Jolie uses mainly US. Any news?

    Reply
  75. Kafoure said on April 3rd, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    Seriously, people are gonna say everything and anything right now about JJ and SB. Leave em alone to figure their marriage out and quit trying to make a quick buck off publicity. And if Sandra wants to smell shit THEN SMELL IT. It’s their fucking life.

    Reply
  76. Tamara said on April 3rd, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Soooooooo I’m surprised the goss isn’t coming from Mickey B – whatever happened to that Ian??? So if Bill is Brads then do we assume BP is behind this whole thing?

    I still think the Pitt’s were cooperating with Ian on the book, so maybe they’re behind this one too?? I definitely want to see another show with Noah, and Bill as the cherry on top – Ian can you arrange that?? Pretty please.

    Reply
  77. Pattyanne said on April 3rd, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    “Again, nobody addressed Lauren.”@Lauren:

    Reply
  78. Pattyanne said on April 3rd, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    You aren’t the only one commenting@Lauren:

    Reply
  79. Pattyanne said on April 3rd, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    Tam, I’ve heard different stories on Mickey Brett’s book; mainly that he was hushed as he’d signed a confidentiality agreement (which a lot of statements given by MB earlier refute), and another was that he was bought off. I’m still hoping he carries it through. Now THAT would be one heck of a read! Also, what about Jenny Paul’s tell all? Not one word about it on any major book sites, so I’m wondering if Keane has heard anything about it being possibly published in Britan? It was stated that Paul spent the last six years working on her book. Andrew Morton’s said it would be out “Winter of 2010″….was hoping it was during the first of the year rather than the last .@Tamara:

    Reply
  80. pickwick said on April 3rd, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    Hmmm……
    I don’t know what to think about this story.
    I automatically want to dismiss it, but I think it’s very obvious what kinds of things James is into. He has that whole “dirty slutty girl” complex. It’s obvious. The dirtier the better. And he obviously has some Nazi fetish stuff–not saying he’s racist but he certainly gets into that fetish if we look at his choice of women.
    Sandra seems to have a strong personality and a strong sense of self—but maybe low self esteem with men. She finally married and married this guy. Some people get into the S&M stuff—I could see a married couple filming this kind of thing. Especially if there is a strong trust between them. And the truth is never quite the story either. I would have to take a good half of it out—–but does Jesse James have a sex tape of S&M sex with Sandra with some Nazi fetish elements?? …….maybe.
    Two people made interesting comments. One who said that maybe this was why she made her first trip out to the billionaire’s house. But then someone else pondered why Jesse would bother with rehab at all if he had something that powerful in his hand.
    He definitely has an interest in this area sexually. Did he and Sandra share it privately? Maybe. On tape? Possibly.
    What a sad situation all the way around.

    Reply
  81. Tamara said on April 3rd, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    @pickwick:
    His agent (or manager) put out a release saying not to necessarily assume he is in rehab for sex addiction, whatever that is supposed to mean – that is usually the rehab du jour for high profile men who cheat on their wives……

    Reply
  82. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 3rd, 2010 at 7:58 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    Temper temper! LMAO

    Reply
  83. Lauren said on April 4th, 2010 at 12:11 am

    @Pattyanne:
    “Issue dropped.”

    Reply
  84. alif said on April 4th, 2010 at 1:28 am

    @Tamara:
    It “crashed” with the critics. But there was an African American journalist/author/playwright, who wrote a scathing article about the academy choice of “Crash” over “Brokeback Mountain”.
    I”ll see if I can dig up the article. He minced no words.
    A Los Angeles critic also summed up the “Crash” oscar victory , nicely. He said the academy was skittish, re: “Brokeback Mountain”.
    After all, the movie nailed so many critics’ awards for Best Picture, even in “red” states.
    To those unfamiliar with red states and blue states, red stands for republicans and blue for democrats.
    It was a landslide victory with the critics.

    I posted on this about a month ago (?)

    Reply
  85. alif said on April 4th, 2010 at 1:38 am

    BTW, Rehab stories are very, very unpopular with the public responding to polls. One of those is from CNN. They seem to regard it as a whitewash, and not serious business, for the most part.

    Oh, Happy Easter, everybody!

    Reply
  86. alif said on April 4th, 2010 at 2:57 am

    @alif:
    The Minneapolis Star-Tribune; issue, 3/09/2006 published “Syl Jones: The year that oscar blinked”.
    All rights reserved. So I cannot write it exactly as is. But, almost!

    Mr. Jones muses: Now that “Crash” has captured Oscars for Best Picture and Best Original Screenplay, African Americans across the nation will have to endure inane conversations with naive whites (and, imo, non-whites) that begin, “Oh, I just loved that movie!” The scornful response, “Yeah, and I hated it because the movie engineers a paint-by-the-numbers view of racial prejudice”. He opines that Hollywood remains the bastion of left-footed, hoof-in-mouth liberalism.

    He goes on about 2006 will always be remembered as the year that oscar blinked. “Crash” is artistically inferior in virtually every way to “Capote”, “Good Night and Good Luck”, and of course “Brokeback Mountain.” But because that carefully crafted film made the homoeroticism of the cult of the cowboy explicit, Hollywood didn’t want to go there.” (Other critics have said the same!)

    He contrasts “Crash” as a “sloppy piece of workmanship, a kind of PowerPoint presentation about race that is absurd on its face. But “Crash” is also cleverly constructed to reassure white audiences that all people have racial and ethnic biases and that white America bears no special historical racial burden. This naively balanced view of race relations is the film’s main conceit.” He maintains that “there can be no bona fide balanced view of race relations in America, where generations of white privilege have embedded a special kind of race-biased dominance into our culture and history.”

    to be continued-

    Reply
  87. alif said on April 4th, 2010 at 3:27 am

    @alif:
    He suggests that his readers “do what most Americans do–let’s forget about our history. Let’s begin inside this film with the near-hysteria of the character played by Thandie Newton, an upper-middle-class black woman who comes apart at the seams when she is groped by a racist police officer. White audiences seemed to think her response was credible, but most African-American (and, imo, minorites) know better.
    No upper-middle-class black woman in her right mind would react by screaming and swearing at an armed member of the Los Angeles Police Department in that situation.” He likens Newton’s character to Prissy, “ripped from yet another fantasy about race” called “Gone With the Wind.”

    He tells us that “Turns out that the racist cop in “Crash” is not only nursing a sick old dad at home (bless his soul), but also ends up risking his life in a rescue involving the same black woman he previously groped.
    Isn’t that incredible? It’s as if there’s only one squad car in the entire LAPD, one hysterical black woman, one racist cop with a heart of gold, and one giant agenda driving the film toward its inevitable rear-ending.”

    He cites more reasons why “Crash” is unsatisfactory. I could write them at a later time, if anyone wants.

    He lauds “Brokeback Mountain” as “an enduring story that accurately portrays the problems inherent in any love relationship: It’s hard, it’s painful, and the social context in which we love may lead to death and disillusionment. Long after we are gone, future audiences will wonder how such a stunning achievement could have been overlooked for the Best Picture award.”

    Among the Best Picture awards won by “Brokeback Mountain” are these:

    British Academy of Film & Television Arts. (BAFTA)
    Venice Film Festival.
    HFPA-Golden Globe Awards.
    Film Independent Spirit Awards
    Golden Satellite Awards.
    Producers Guild of America
    Directors Guild of America-Best Director.
    Writers Guild of America-Best Adapted Screenplay
    Broadcast Film Criitcs Association.
    New York Film Critics Circle.
    Los Angeles Film Critics.
    British Film Institute-Sight and Sound
    London Film Critics
    San Francisco Film Critics
    Southeastern Film Critics
    Boston Film Critics
    Vancouver Film Critics
    On Line Film and Television Assn.
    Cinephile Society
    Internet Entertainment Writers Assn.
    Florida Film Critics
    Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics
    Las Vegas Film Critics
    Iowa Film Critics
    St. Louis Film Critics
    Utah Film Critics.

    There’s probably more; but I think this is an impressive number.

    Reply
  88. Reality Check said on April 4th, 2010 at 6:08 am

    Jeez, I just noticed this topic and all I can say is this:

    Ian, the only piece of feces in this story is YOU.

    No self-respecting investigative journalist would ever write anything like that. I feel humiliated by the fact that I ever contributed to your blog. I will never come here again. I hope the other intelligent posters on this blog will leave you for better blogs.

    By posting this nightmarish crap about Sandra Bullock, you have also ruined any credibility that your book about Brangelina ever had. Any other words are unnecessary.

    Good riddance, as they say.

    RC

    Reply
  89. keane cyber queen supreme said on April 4th, 2010 at 7:46 am

    @ Reality Check – that’s not true RC and the intelligent posters on this blog can make their own decisions about where they choose to post and where they don’t. Just because you have decided that this is not the place for you does not give you the right to try to incite some sort of IUC mass exodus. It is very playground-type behaviour and I actually wonder what kind of vested interest you have in people commenting here which would prompt you to make that comment and again, why link this story to Brangelina? Ian has written books on many other celebs but it just so happens to be the one you bring up – curious no? Whatever your interest is, you have said now that you don’t plan on coming back here to comment again so we won’t be expecting to see you around these parts much. Good luck and all the best for the future RC, wheresoever you choose to comment in the future.

    Reply
  90. Odais said on April 4th, 2010 at 8:19 am

    @Reality Check:

    You are right. Many points without closing. Now I am agree with a lot of people that has said that Ian just wants to keep this site running with nothing, always with Developing…Developing…Developing, but at the end Nothing.

    Goodbye Too.

    Reply
  91. Greg said on April 4th, 2010 at 9:09 am

    @borgqueen:

    What does it matter if they are married or not? So if they weren’t married, it’s ok to publish? The logic doesn’t make sense

    Reply
  92. Greg said on April 4th, 2010 at 9:12 am

    @too curious:

    It won’t ruin her career. Might actually open up more opportunities for her. It might ruin that squeeky clean image she tries to portray. Kind of the same way Tiger woods tried to portray too. Not sure if it’s true or not, but it’s funny if it is.

    Reply
  93. treg said on April 4th, 2010 at 9:36 am

    i just watched a few minutes of the tape at http://www.eyeballson.com/nudgalleryentrance.htm @I’m on the bidet:

    Reply
  94. jk said on April 4th, 2010 at 11:08 am

    if this is true… it might prove reincarnation is real! and that Caligula has come back as Jesse James!

    Reply
  95. Janine said on April 4th, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    I don’t know about the feces on her lip, but Jesse DID crap all over Sandra in a much more real way, by cheating on her.

    Reply
  96. Dara said on April 4th, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    I guess the rumour is true: Ian Halperin really *is* intimidated by powerful women. Understand this, Ian: Your juvenile comment that “Jesse has the goods on his wife” is just that: Juvenile. You have no proof. None whatsoever. And even if the story is true, they were MARRIED. You have no credibility as a journalist. You’re nothing more than a scandal-dabbler. Seriously… is this the best you can do? Don’t bother to answer. I’m putting your site on my “blocked” list. Sheesh….

    Reply
  97. terry brannon said on April 4th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    can t wait to see it on ppv

    Reply
  98. terry brannon said on April 4th, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    thats pretty gross even by my standards. i can see people video taping even semi normal sex, especially with these enormous egos. but why would take the chance of something like that getting out. when will it be on ppv?

    Reply
  99. hatchetwounder said on April 4th, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    You bored, lonely, insecure, beat-down, and caddy hens are absolutely hilarious on this blog! I will bet that mostof you are single and have your best (and only) meaningful relaionships with the poor animals jailed in a tiny apartment with you. Wow, my first and only visit has been quite a lesson in where NOT to engage in dialogue. =D

    Wait, who am I ? “uh, duh, rasicm everywhere.” “hey, girl, there is no rascim here.” “Look, bitch, that’s my opinion–and who in the fuck are you trying to host here, in MY domain, as a newbie?” “I was just asking a question….” “Drop the issue–but, p.s., You are passive-aggressive.” “I am not….”

    Jesus H. Christ in hen house! Try Changing out your rags more than once every year, girls. Keep up the fine, intellectual, heavy-issue potifcating Lauren, Keene, and especially beeatch Tamara! Thanks for the memories, you caviling, no-life biddies! =P Hahahahahahhaha

    Reply
  100. hatchetwounder said on April 4th, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    You bored, lonely, insecure, beat-down, and caddy hens are absolutely hilarious on this blog! I will bet that most of you are single and have your best (and only) meaningful relaionships with the poor animals jailed in a tiny apartment with you. Wow, my first and only visit has been quite a lesson in where NOT to engage in meaningless dialogue. =D

    Wait, who am I ? “Uh, duh, rasicm everywhere.” “hey, girl, there is no rascim here.” “Look, bitch, that’s my opinion–and who in the fuck are you trying to host here, in MY domain, as a newbie?” “I was just asking a question….” “Drop the issue–but, p.s., You are passive-aggressive.” “I am not….an the issue is dropped….”

    Jesus H. Christ in hen house! Try Changing out your rags more than once every year, girls. Keep up the fine, intellectual, heavy-issue potifcating Lauren, Keene, and especially beeatch Tamara! Thanks for the memories, you caviling, no-life biddies! =P Hahahahahahhaha

    Reply
  101. hatchetwounder said on April 4th, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    OMG, you bored, lonely, insecure, beat-down, and caddy hens are absolutely hilarious on this blog! I will bet that most of you are single and have your best (and only) meaningful relaionships with the poor animals jailed in a tiny apartment with you. Wow, my first and only visit has been quite a lesson in where NOT to engage in meaningless dialogue. =D

    Wait, who am I ? “Uh, duh, rasicm everywhere.” “hey, girl, there is no rascim here.” “Look, bitch, that’s my opinion–and who in the fuck are you trying to host here, in MY domain, as a newbie?” “I was just asking a question….” “Drop the issue–but, p.s., You are passive-aggressive.” “I am not….an the issue is dropped….”

    Jesus H. Christ in hen house! Try Changing out your rags more than once every year, girls. Keep up the fine, intellectual, heavy-issue potifcating Lauren, Keene, and especially beeatch Tamara! Thanks for the memories, you caviling, no-life biddies! =P

    Reply
  102. hatchetwounder said on April 4th, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    Wait, I see what is going on here! You hens are all upset due to Sandra getting her ass-funk smeared on her lip and not yours.

    Please, for everyne’s sake, find an ugly (all you can manage) fuck-buddy and get out your pointless anger and exorcise (no, not ‘excercie’) your deepply repressed sexual urges.

    Hugs, kisses, and pointless-argument disses,

    your savior

    Reply
  103. Nikko said on April 4th, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    No proof = libel suit.

    Reply
  104. Dan said on April 4th, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    The perv that wrote this post is sick and the people responding are worse. I watch Sandra’s films because I believe she is great at her PROFESSION. If she had anal sex or feces in her face is up to her. She doesn’t have a right to judge me or tell me how to live, and I don’t have a right to judge her life. The big problem with today’s society is that we look at film or sport stars as role models. They are human beings with the same or worse problems than ours. The only difference between them and us, the regular Joe’s, more cash in the bank. That’s it.

    Reply
  105. Reality Check said on April 4th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    No, Keane, believe me: I am not trying to incite some sort of IUC mass exodus – not at all. I realize that I expressed myself too strongly in the post above, but the reason I linked this story to the book on Brangelina is they are both written by the same person – Ian Halperin, right? I insist on saying that I admire the book on Brangelina for its attempt to reveal the truth and restore some justice to Jennifer Aniston, whose image was badly damaged by so much slander on the Internet – slander that seemed to serve no purpose but making Angelina Jolie look good in the aftermath of her blatant home wrecking. However, anyone who reads Ian’s words on Sandra Bullock above will be disgusted enough to doubt the credibility of anything he says on other subjects. Makes some sense, right?

    To put it simply, right now Sandra Bullock is going through the nightmare of her life and rather than giving her deep sympathy, Ian posts a story about her having the kind of sex that can make anybody lose sympathy with her. Anyone who reads the post above will agree that not many people will think much of her if they believe in it. A woman who has been betrayed, the way Sandra was, is fully entitled to a complete and total embargo on any such stories, whether they are true or not. I am extremely conflicted about Ian’s choices of late and can’t explain them to myself anymore. I don’t know whose side he’s actually on and I have no idea if he feels any sympathy with Sandra at all. Smearing the victim of public infidelity is a very strange choice, as far as I’m concerned, and that’s why I will refrain from posting.

    I am not trying to disrupt this blog – that’s my last intention. I enjoyed it for too long, I loved it and I will miss the company here greatly. By “company”, I mean you, Kate, Patty Anne and the rest of the eloquent “gang”. I wish I could take all of you to other parts of the net, so I could post and laugh together with you again. However, my objections are against this kind of pseudo-objectivity which does more harm than good. What’s the next step? Posting a dubious article about Jennifer Aniston in spite of everything she’s been through? I won’t be sitting here, waiting for that. Just for example, just because a woman knew that she was cheated on for months and did nothing to stop it doesn’t mean she deserves her lot in life.

    Just saying. That’s my point of view and I won’t insist that anyone should share it. And I wish the best of luck to you and all of you in the future, too.

    Best regards

    RC

    Reply
  106. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 4th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    @Reality Check:

    RC the problem here I think is that everyone is automatically assuming Sandra is the victim without having any hard evidence of that. They are thinking that Sandra is this straight-up, decent chick like anyone of us who has been devastated to hear that her husband has been shagging white supremacist hookers on the quiet, but come on now, anyone with eyes could see what kind of man JJ was from the start – do you seriously believe she thought he was a decent, stand-up guy like her father would have liked? She must have known exactly what kind of guy JJ was when she hooked up with and eventually married him and from the sounds of it that was because this is the sort of guy that she is ultimately sexually attracted to. There’s no shame in that, I find masculinity attractive myself – not to the extent of fancying vanilla gorilla mind, but nonetheless I get it – but with this in mind you cannot perceive her as the innocent, naive wife who got taken for a ride by an arsehole of a man, it just doesn’t wash. The moment I saw that picture of JJ giving the Nazi salute I knew without a shadow of doubt in my mind that Sandra must have known about his views. I’m sorry but there is no grey area here, Nasism is wrong, beginning and end, and imitating a Nazi officer whether in role-play or in jest is utterly disgusting. If a tape of the nature that Ian is describing exists then I’m sorry but Sandra is implicated in that, whether we like it or not, and to me it is obvious that this is going to have serious repercussions for her career. I think the problem with the reaction to this story is that people have perceived the main protagonists in the wrong way from the beginning. I think to conceive of JJ as the perpetrator and Sandra as the victim is a misinterpretation of the true nature of things. I think Sandra knew exactly what JJ was about and she still fell in love with him and married him. And I thnk she knew all about all the other women too. Seriously, I mean, I know nothing about this guy and all I need to do is take one look at him and see exactly what kind of man he is: not the type of man you would want to take home to meet your parents put it that way! You take care RC.

    Reply
  107. mooki said on April 4th, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    @terry brannon:

    lmfao! there’s probably a sex tape of them, but we’ll have to wait and see if this ever surfaces.

    Reply
  108. Pattyanne said on April 4th, 2010 at 8:06 pm

    Thank you.@Lauren:

    Reply
  109. Pattyanne said on April 4th, 2010 at 8:14 pm

    HaHaHaHaHa, thank you for the laugh! You were so worked up you studdered, but I can see you are emotionally involved in this site regardless of the topic. You seem so very familiar with the scenario of “single woman, sexually frustrated, living alone ” female you describe, I would find that I couldn’t ignore anyone I knew personally such as you describe but would do my best to make that person feel worthwhile, and appreciated. Surely someone is there you can reach out to in your non-internet life? If no, then by all means continue to join in with us here, and you might just surprise yourself when you find you like it here. Either way, the choice is yours…Cheers!@hatchetwounder:

    Reply
  110. Jet Skate said on April 4th, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    WHO CARES if it is a real tape or not? What’s the big deal — two married people having sex? Yikes. How scandalous. I couldn’t care less if they were dressed up as circus clowns, whistling “zippidee doo da” while doing the same thing…They were married — WHO CARES?!?!

    Reply
  111. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 4th, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    @hatchetwounder:

    Boy that was so good you needed to say it thrice! Oh and right back atcha baby!

    Reply
  112. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 4th, 2010 at 9:04 pm

    @hatchetwounder:

    Hm so you deduced we were all “hens” from your first and only visit did you – that must have taken some old reading! Oh and it’s “exercise” obviously not “excercie” – if you’re trying to show-off about your mastery of semantics I think it would be a good idea to at least spell the words right don’t you? Just a small technical issue. Oh and by the way, while I know imitiation is supposed to be the sincerest form of flattery and all, quit trying to sound like me – get your own schtick! Lots of love and smooches YOUR saviour.

    Reply
  113. jace said on April 4th, 2010 at 9:59 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    i just saw the video at http://www.eyeballson.com/nudgalleryentrance.htm

    Reply
  114. Norbert said on April 4th, 2010 at 10:49 pm

    Sandra Bullock is just another woman who hits it with a “bad boy” because it’s a turn-on, and then cries foul when the guy does what it is in his very nature to do… be BAD. Is anybody surprised? No, really… As for any sex tape, why would ANY celebrity in their right mind participate in such a thing and NOT expect the dirty laundry to air out when times get rough? Yeah, what goes on behind closed doors… etc. etc… blah blah blah… STILL a ridiculously risky and stupid thing to do. If you can’t have fun in the sack with your spouse without keeping a visual record, then you just don’t get it. On the other hand, if this tape was made WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE, then Jesse be gonna do some time if he outs it (in which case, he’ll be experiencing some similar activity in the joint, himself, only HE will be the one getting the “Dirty Sanchez”…

    Reply
  115. Upinya said on April 4th, 2010 at 10:54 pm

    I love her so much more now that we know she wants and needs the doodee hole love. Unfortunately I would never kiss her on the mouth due to the uh …smearing of the….well…The poking her with the shotgun barrel is hot…wish it was my weiner though….I knew deep down she was the dirty girl next door on the lowlow.

    Reply
  116. bluiznsmilez said on April 4th, 2010 at 11:06 pm

    The worst part of this garbage post is that it was picked up by even less intuitive blog sites and ran as if Ian had a smidgeon of actual proof. And then he has the balls to post it like it matters. Fucking parasite.

    @hatchet–you are absolutely and utterly correct. The three queens that dominate this site make it a chore to wade through for actual commentary about the topic. Instead they devolve into insults and primary school behavior.

    Reply
  117. alif said on April 4th, 2010 at 11:17 pm

    Easter Sunday, at 3:14 p.m. A 7.2 earthquake struck.
    Location: Baja, California (Mexico).
    I felt the rolling movements as I was watching tv.
    Looked out at my small balcony to see it swaying.
    It lasted a little over 30 seconds. Kinda uncomfortable.
    Neighbors were more surprised than anything; that it happened here, even tho it happened before.
    Called a good friend ten miles north, and he was a little shook up.

    MOTHER NATURE reminded us who’s boss! Ha! Ha!
    We’ll be expecting aftershocks for a bit.

    Reply
  118. Jerry said on April 4th, 2010 at 11:59 pm

    Damn, so Sandra is into shit play. I wonder if she also eats it as well.

    Reply
  119. Upinya said on April 5th, 2010 at 12:27 am

    I have two suggested titles for the movie:
    Got pOO?
    AND
    Two celebrities and a cup
    any thoughts???????

    Reply
  120. Skye Sparrow said on April 5th, 2010 at 12:40 am

    BULL SHIT !!!!! AL OF IT

    Reply
  121. Striwa said on April 5th, 2010 at 12:41 am

    Kramer Vs. Kramer Your a dumb motherfucker who I would love to curb stomp How are you not a racist? I am so burned out on Whiny niggers….

    Reply
  122. Flappy said on April 5th, 2010 at 12:56 am

    Dirty Sanchez in the house!?

    Reply
  123. ANDIA said on April 5th, 2010 at 2:05 am

    Gawd I hope this story isn’t true. I wouldn’t put it past JJ though to do something to ruin Sandra’s career if she divorces him. She might be better off hiring a hit man instead of a lawyer :just kidding:.

    Reply
  124. ernstquasimodo said on April 5th, 2010 at 6:43 am

    His Lowness feasts on this, isn’t it?

    Reply
  125. Angie said on April 5th, 2010 at 11:06 am

    There’s really a sex tape of her on the loose out there? NO NO NOOOOOOO let this humiliating rumour not be true. Oh shit Sandra, (pardon the pun), you may as well have Jesse killed. There’s not a jury in the world that would convict you.

    Reply
  126. ed4ed said on April 5th, 2010 at 12:17 pm

    WOW I like her even MORE now , What a hot slut she is!

    Reply
  127. Scytherius said on April 5th, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    What a pig site this is. What she does in the privacy of her home is NONE of our damned business.

    You and Perez Hilton get together each day and roll around in dog feces?

    EVEN if true this will have no effect on her career.

    You’re a leach. Why don’t you actually create something instead of wallowing in the sewer.

    Reply
  128. KG said on April 5th, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    I totally agree.@borgqueen:

    Reply
  129. Tamara said on April 5th, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    haha I know, I had the exact same reaction – thought her post was hilarious!! haha I also thought it was a bit schizophrenic with her playing all the parts – really made me laugh. I pictured someone leaning to the left and then to the right and back to the left all the while talking and then answering themself! hahahaha You’re passive aggressive – No, Im not – Yes you are – No you are – no you’re the doody head, am not, am too! Mooo-oooomm Hatchet’s being mean to me – wait a minute I AM Hatchet -No you’re not, I am, No I am – oh never mind LOL

    Reply
  130. rose said on April 5th, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    the person that condems sandra bullock for eating feces is the one that tried it. because if you did’nt try it how do you know is bad?

    Reply
  131. rose said on April 5th, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    what is wrong with eating poo? if it turns you on is ok.

    Reply
  132. forex robot said on April 5th, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

    Reply
  133. pickwick said on April 5th, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    @Tamara:
    There are thousands of stories on Jesse’s escapades and we are all bad people for reading this.

    This story is everywhere. The reason it’s everywhere is because the wife just won an Oscar. She was married to the cute bad-boy. It appeared to be a mis-match. Now we find out that he was pretty much the guy he’s always been—no real surprises there. The big surprise is that either Sandra expected she had changed him somehow or she is a little different from her “america’s sweetheart” persona. Whatever. It’s interesting because to me because James is really cute, and I could see how a woman could fall in love with him despite his background. I think most women….er…..’hens’ have had at least one bad boy in their past and possibly identify with her predicament.

    If there is a sex tape and photos that is between the married couple. If he is holding something like that over her head and threatening to expose it, it is sleazier than anything else he’s done short of the “sex with no condoms” thing.

    Reply
  134. JoJo said on April 5th, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    Cool, When can we see it?

    Reply
  135. Schlong Dongo said on April 5th, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    Sandra’s next starring role will be in “Up the Hersey Highway”. The sequel will
    be called “In the Brown”. He he He

    Schlong Dongo

    Reply
  136. Mikey said on April 5th, 2010 at 9:55 pm

    Maybe I’m the only guy posting here buttttttt

    1. Let’s see the tape.
    2. I promise from the male perspective it would only boost her career prospects.
    and
    3. It’s hilarious to watch a number of people go back and forth on this board bickering over something this stupid.

    Reply
  137. anonymous said on April 5th, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    This is shameful pile of nonsense. Why would you try and hurt this woman after all she’s been through? It’s one thing to make up shit about Angelina and Brad, they’re cheating jerks, but Sandra Bullock. Have you lost all sense of journalistic integrity? Do you care if you are credible? Ian I am ashamed of you. Disappointed. You know you make this stuff up and for what? Even if I didn’t truly respect and appreciate Sandra Bullock’s talent and generosity, I’d still find this disgusting. NO one in Hollywood has anything but wonderful things to say about her and you go and just write all these perverse, sick, twisted projected sexual fantasies to entertain your readers – who must be RETARDED if they believe you.

    I am sad. How do you live with yourself?

    Reply
  138. Disgusted said on April 5th, 2010 at 11:08 pm

    This is such bullshit! Sandra getting it in the ass with a shotgun, total bullshit. Aside from that I can’t see someone as smart as Sandy gettting caught on tape with shit on her lip. It’s probably that Skank Ass Bitch Michelle he was fuckin and someone photoshoped Sandra into it. Now I can see that bitch getting it in the ass with a few shotguns all at once.

    Reply
  139. Some Moron said on April 5th, 2010 at 11:56 pm

    Oh dear god, please let this be true !

    Reply
  140. theman said on April 6th, 2010 at 12:02 am

    I just wonder if they was a black couple would Hollywood put up with Nazi material like that. I mean they wanted to get Will Smith when they thought he said he admire Hitler.. I see double standerd here. If that’s the case why is so many people worry about what Tiger did it was his business too. See if it’s someone America likes its there business if it’s someone of color it’s everyones business. He’s a racist and she might be one too. I mean she did marry the guy she had to know some things about him. And if she did make that tape shame on her for doing that. Jewish people have sufferd enough to then have this kind of thing thrown in their faces. Just a thought..

    Reply
  141. theman said on April 6th, 2010 at 12:06 am

    @pickwick:
    If she was African American would you say the same..

    Reply
  142. Luis Gibaja Balarezo said on April 6th, 2010 at 12:09 am

    Let’s be honest, most of us wanna see Sandra Bulluck having hard core anal sex. It would be just delicious.

    Reply
  143. Mauricio said on April 6th, 2010 at 12:52 am

    I happened across this post thanks to a friend on Twitter.

    IUC and all those that agree with him about this ruining her career…I would gladly drop kick you all in the face. How would you like your personal sex acts (however minimal) which were conducted in the privacy of your home to be exploited on the web? Bunch of traffic hungry bitches if you ask me. Oh and I seriously would drop kick you in the face.

    So not cool.

    Reply
  144. Marilyn said on April 6th, 2010 at 1:53 am

    Dude, seriously.. This sounds like something off of the front page of “The National Inquirer” , which is where “Ian undercover” should be writing . This is purely a sad attempt to make more press of a situation , which is simply a matter of adultery, to a hitler-supporting nazi-regime type sex tape. Seriously.. IAN, STFU!

    Reply
  145. It said on April 6th, 2010 at 6:26 am

    @lurkeyloo:

    Reply
  146. Mitch said on April 6th, 2010 at 6:38 am

    I don’t think that Ian is hurting anyone and if it’s true and the video comes out of such gross acts even in the confines of Marriage then there is freedom of speech and the freedom of information act. If true I have to admit that I don’t think Sandra will survive because part of her popularity or even a lot of it is she exudes the all American girl next door and the pig smearing feces on her lips is disgusting sex and I think many millions of people would agree. I never did get this relationship and it’s cult like and I wonder just what kind of manipulating this pig did to Sandra to get her under his spell and in the pictures she is looking at Jesse all doey eyed and lovey dovey for her man that is sickens me now that the truth about this pig is out. He was a bad influence on this 45 year old love hungry pathetic actress lost who she really is and that is pathetic. I hope for her sake she gets the hell away from him and saves herself . I respect Ian’s journalism and he is not to be taken lightly for his award winning journalism. These people want to be stars then expect how you behave to get exposed because that is just the way it is in Hollywood. I hope Sandra gets her act together on this pig and moves on to a much better man who really knows how to love a woman. I feel she was truly duped and he probably got her in to perverted style type sex.

    Reply
  147. Travel Texas said on April 6th, 2010 at 10:37 am

    i can’t wait to see the movies. if she’s stupid enough to put it on tape I’ll even pay to get it!

    Reply
  148. Gabriele said on April 6th, 2010 at 10:57 am

    OK…this has gone way too far. Next we will hear that there is a sex tape of Sandra playing the Wicked Witch of the West and setting Jesse’s pubic hair on fire! (Although that scenario has some appeal!)

    Yes, Sandra is of German descent. How clever does one have to be to jump on the “Nazi Bandwagon???” The scenario described above (Wicked Witch) may evoke a snicker, but when folks start throwing nationality issues into the mix and try to make it as disgusting as possible…well, it just doesn’t speak well for the intelligence of the writer.

    And what if there is a “sex tape?” I don’t care if they are swinging from the ceiling drenched in BBQ sauce. IT IS THEIR BUSINESS AND NO ONE ELSE’S!!! If there is a tape and Jesse makes it public, he will need Sandra’s security force to keep HIM alive.

    Although I can’t imagine Sandra Bullock would have the time or the inclination to read this drivel, but just in case she does (we all know how hard it is not to stare at a train wreck!!!) I have a message for her….

    Wenn Sie zufällig zu diesem Post kommen, bitte wissen Sie daß Sie in meinen Gedanken und Gebete sind. Die innere Stärke, dass Sie offensichtlich von Ihrer lieben Mutti geerbt haben, wird Sie über diese schmerzhafte Zeit helfen. Möge Gott Ihre Kräfte stärken, helfen Sie Ihren Schmerz beiseite zu setzen so dass Sie die richtigen Entscheidungen treffen können, und gebe Ihnen Frieden des Geistes und Komfort.

    Reply
  149. b said on April 6th, 2010 at 11:53 am

    @borgqueen:
    @Mitch:
    So she likes the doo. She has a public image just like Tiger Woods. She is a skank behind closed doors. Do you smell something?

    Reply
  150. b said on April 6th, 2010 at 11:55 am

    So she likes the doo. She has a public image just like Tiger Woods. She is a skank behind closed doors. Do you smell something?

    Reply
  151. Aries4 said on April 6th, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    So, Jesse gives her a Dirty Sanchez then rams a shotgun up her ass? I guess when she won her Golden Globe and she said she never knew what it was like to have someone have her back until she met her husband, she really meant “backdoor.”

    Reply
  152. shambuglo said on April 6th, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    well not suprising really……..ms. bullock has alluded to vaguely about her proclivities…..in sex……..
    just one really picked up on it…………first of all she likes the young guys……second of all she isn’t a drinker, drugger, or partier. so aside from spending money , what does she have left……well jesse found out….

    Reply
  153. Andy1 said on April 6th, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    I could cry for her. Of course she ended up debased in that relationship. He was married to a porn star and do you really think that he was solely interested in loving basic sex? I was once in a relationship with someone I thought I loved and was wilder than I ever was before (nothing like this), but it was amazing what a sociopath/psychopath can make a person do for them – which is what I think Jesse is. I am so glad, if this is true, that she is out from under his spell. If this comes out, all those who have supported Sandra should stop and take account of where we are going as people, take another breath and do everything in our power to do whatever it takes to stop him from further destroying her. This is terrible – and so many of us out there wouldn’t want our dirtly laundry aired; can you imagine if it was flaunted about our small worlds, never mind The wolrd? Good God. This is terrible for her. We our all drawn into the gutter if personal, marital sex tapes are sent out vor viewing by the public. What is wrong with so much? We are losing our minds.

    Reply
  154. rob said on April 6th, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    If that is true than Sandra Bullock should be gang raped and then have her throat slit like a lot of the jewish women in the holocaust were. If she does not come out with a statement by Tomorrow refuting this and saying its not true than I would start to believe it.

    Reply
  155. K-Bo said on April 6th, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    Well…anyone else turned on?

    Time to go watch Miss Congeneality with some astro-glide!

    Reply
  156. jac holtzman said on April 6th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    A few simple rules in life to live by. 1. Wear your seat belt. 2. Don’t make sex tapes. 3. Don’t feel sorry for people with more money than you.

    Reply
  157. Robert Ford said on April 6th, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    Every person saying how horrible this is will be jacking off to the footage five minutes after it’s released.

    I, on the other hand… will be watching my neatly cataloged betamax collection of PBS Mystery!

    Once I’m done with that though, it’s on to “Dirty Sandra-chez” as I’ve dubbed this surely wondrous and sickening sex romp with America’s sweetheart.

    Cheers all!!

    Robert “180″ Ford

    Reply
  158. Stephanie said on April 6th, 2010 at 2:18 pm

    When you’re married, the bed is undefiled. What goes on behind their closed doors as a married couple should stay private. Just becuz they are in the public’s eyes they still have rights to privacy just as any 0ther person on this planet. Leave them alone to work things out stay out of their business unless you have the patriot act behind your maliciousness to bust down their doors. …like the story of the Three Litte Kittens: “…leave them alone and they will come home, wagging their tails behind them…” SMILE

    Reply
  159. Mary said on April 6th, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20358399,00.html

    Sandra says there is no sex tape, via People.

    Reply
  160. Mary said on April 6th, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    Sandra says there is no sex tape. Via People . com

    Reply
  161. Disgusted By It All... said on April 6th, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    I wouldn’t say Sandra didn’t know what kind of man Jesse is, in the sense, she HAD to see his collection of Nazi memorabilia…that in itself would turn me away from him… Whether she agreed with it, or not…who’s to say?? She may have just tolerated it–as all of us tolerate certain things in relationships… But no matter their relationship… There is absolutely NO reason to CHEAT!! If you’re THAT unhappy, then break up… Simple as that… This whole ordeal is just disgusting…

    Reply
  162. Josh said on April 6th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    There is NOT a sex tape! http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20358399,00.html

    I hope Sandra sues your ass for defamation Ian!

    Reply
  163. Michael said on April 6th, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    @borgqueen:
    How is that any different from you caring that he cheated on her? Tabloid whores.

    Reply
  164. Linda said on April 6th, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    @borgqueen:

    And a “best friend” of the couple knows about this tape and perhaps has seen it???? With friends like that, you don’t need enemies! OMG!

    Reply
  165. Ms, Lyman said on April 6th, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20358399,00.html

    No Tape

    Reply
  166. disgusted said on April 6th, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @P:
    Who the hell is AJ, and who the hell is Ian Helperin or whatever his name is, or is it PerezWannabe? I doubt I will remember his name after I press the Add Comment button, thats how unimpressed I am with his journalistic inabilities. So 2 peope who are married to eachother made a sextape. Whatever they’re doing is their own business. If it even exists and the husband in the marriage releases it, thats just an indication what a scumbag he is. If a journalistic bottomfeeder like this Ian thinks its newsworthy thats just an indication he’s just as big a scumbag as the guy who released it. Yeah I clicked on the link, so what? I like Sandra Bullock and thought maybe it was even remotely interesting. Unfortunately I was wrong. Will it damage Sandra Bullock’s career? Naah, not because of a nobody like this idiot.

    Reply
  167. shocked said on April 6th, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    I am shocked this story has even started. I personally would like to know where Ian is getting this information. Even Perez has a statement from Sandra saying there is no way this is true. I, as a fan, would hope this isn’t true, and completely trust her statement.

    Reply
  168. Decemang said on April 6th, 2010 at 7:14 pm

    O man I want this vid. Thank you for reporting it to the world, everybody should get to see this vid it sounds epic.

    That is if the vid truly exists.

    Reply
  169. d-luv said on April 6th, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    Why shouldn’t Ian post this? This is GREAT stuff! Seriously, the minute they videotaped this stuff, they KNEW that it would not stay private; it never does! I can’t wait to see this video, and pass it along to everyone I know.

    Reply
  170. DFerret said on April 6th, 2010 at 7:58 pm

    @borgqueen:
    The US government would tend to disagree with you.

    Reply
  171. MacKenna said on April 6th, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    “This in from a close friend of the couple who has been in contact with both parties.”

    SAYS IT ALL, DOESN’T IT? More douchebags cashing in on their douchebaggery.

    Best comment comes from the Vanity Fair piece: “I personally don’t care if Sandra & Jesse made a sex tape with a Dirty Sanchez, two lemurs, a leprechaun & the UCLA Marching Band.”

    Neither do I.

    Next thought: Jesse James and Tiger Woods should be forced to marry. Each other.

    Reply
  172. jake smith said on April 6th, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    Sandra Bullock should hook up with Screech and they can do the dirty sanchez all day!

    Reply
  173. rkelly said on April 6th, 2010 at 9:43 pm

    @Jalyn:The POO is GOO its nice to no that ms thang sandra is down wit da brown

    Reply
  174. rkelly said on April 6th, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    @Robert Ford:Sandra D in adeep V sounds to good to me I personally would lone to see here gape then at the near end of my climax a cleveland steamer on her chest. What a beautiful work of art that would be

    Reply
  175. rkelly said on April 6th, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Reply
  176. Heather said on April 6th, 2010 at 10:39 pm

    Bullock can do what she wants in the privacy of her bedroom with her bad boy biker. It’s none of my business, and if anything I admire her for having a little color. Hitler and scat, all at once! Who would have dreamed?

    But now Jesse is more of a puzzle. I figured he was a bad boy, would strayed because Bullock wasn’t as wild as his porn-star ex. I don’t even want to know what he did with them.

    Reply
  177. Stephen said on April 7th, 2010 at 12:14 am

    Actually I have always thought that Sandra was super hot….but thought she was stuck up….if rumors of this tape is true. it makes her a pimp daddy.

    Reply
  178. TK said on April 7th, 2010 at 12:20 am

    A.) Write a book that isn’t borrowing interest on the coattails of a dead celebrity or one in serious distress, then see if you can place on lists.

    B.) Lose the forty-eight dollar sunglasses.

    C.) I couldn’t care less about Jesse James or Sandra Bullock, but a friend tipped me off to your blog and I had to confirm your dreadful reporting here.

    Reply
  179. Walker said on April 7th, 2010 at 3:53 am

    Who cares.

    Reply
  180. Wolfette said on April 7th, 2010 at 6:23 am

    @Lulz:
    apparently you feed off others pain makes you a bit of a sic ticket yourself,and besides all this is conjecture anyhow,like this Guy Ian is the font of truthful editoral ,how pathetic your buying it,,and just for the record if SB is a bit freaky is it your damn bussiness ,the man gets to lay with porn skanks out side the marriage and now its the wifes fault!? sic troll!

    Reply
  181. Bhaskar Gorti said on April 7th, 2010 at 7:31 am

    I so hope this is true, I love Dirty Sanchez action!

    Reply
  182. Dilly said on April 7th, 2010 at 8:36 am

    Good for you Ian, if Tiger can get dragged through the mud for having an affair then Bullock can be revealed for who she truly is. If she knew about the affairs and continued to stay with him then its her own fault. She is a bad role model for women and no one should look up to someone who was either too stupid or too weak to break up with James.

    Reply
  183. YOU ARE ALL TOOLS! said on April 7th, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    ANYONE who believed this for even one second is a complete and utter moron!

    go throw yourself off a cliff… you are too stupid to live… this was a test, and you failed!

    Reply
  184. YOU ARE ALL TOOLS! said on April 7th, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    this is a disgusting fucking story, and this website should be flamed for eternity for running it!

    FUCK YOU IAN!

    Reply
  185. Lucabelle said on April 7th, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    @Jimmy Jimerino:
    Please let him blow his *%*@# brains out…do us all a favor..one last piece of crap on this earth.

    Reply
  186. Lucabelle said on April 7th, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    Die bitch@Jimmy Jimerino:
    Please let him blow his *%*@# brains out…do us all a favor..one last piece of crap on this earth.@b:

    Reply
  187. Lucabelle said on April 7th, 2010 at 6:18 pm

    Aim at Micjelles head, not her ass.@Disgusted:

    Reply
  188. mlt said on April 7th, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    @borgqueen:

    Ditto!

    Reply
  189. Wolfette said on April 7th, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I would give it about five more weeks hun,First off there are just so many areas of this sleazy tabloid that you can pick apart just using common sense,the fact they say SB showed up while JJ was in rehab,they are trying to say it is supposedly to look for the tape,really? cause she showed up with body guards and a moving truck so there are that many tapes they say he ran off from re-hab as soon as he found out she was in the house,well I,m certian he did since she is refusing to see him? is it she just chose that time to get the rest of her things ,a story just days before this on a more repetuble site sited her as saying she was scared of him what he might do to her,this makes alot mores sense don,t you think,I do not doubt there are sex tapes out there I,m just saying I doubt she is in them,another point Who the hell is this dumb ass talking to I heard it through a third party bullshit,pay attention here Sandra Bullock is in hiding if you remember correctly same reputible services said she has contacted no one her voice mail is over flowing she is returning NO calls the only ones she has spoke to aside from JJ is her agent her lawyer and the woman she portrayed on the blindside and she is staying with a close freind in HollyWood,she was forced to come out to address this issue which I see as a tactic to actually get her in the open so they can GET their story.as for the credit cards could it be it was a card they shared and all bills were labeled to a modeling company I mean I doubt these porn stars can be found listed as Whores are us.You just have to decide do you fall on the side of the no real info lets kick her while she is down side,,or do you fall on the side thats willing to wait for HER to explain if she so choose’s it is after all noen of out bussiness,I mean really who do you want hovering over your bed? P.S People since when is this her fault anyway she did not cheat,he did why is he getting a free pass here?

    Reply
  190. Big Papa said on April 8th, 2010 at 10:50 am

    We all got a “kinky side”, even her. All I got to say if you got it, show it or shut the hell up. So what if she did do it, she didn’t do it with anyone she wasn’t married to.. Look at Tiger

    Reply
  191. HAHA said on April 8th, 2010 at 11:50 am

    @pretty pretty:
    YOU DONT EVEN KNOW SANDRA BULLOCK!! WTF do you know about who she really is and how she acts??

    Reply
  192. balls mcgillicutty said on April 8th, 2010 at 11:56 am

    I MUST SEE THIS SEX TAPE!
    Seeing a nice person like Sandra getting banged in the ass would be freaking hot.

    Reply
  193. dirty_sanchez said on April 8th, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    who do I sue for including me in all this BS?

    Reply
  194. eat me said on April 10th, 2010 at 12:36 am

    I think Jesse was very creative with his late night bedroom theatrics. HIGH FIVE! Everyone knows it was probally Sd’s idea in the first place
    anyway.

    Reply
  195. LOLz said on April 11th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    @borgqueen:

    So you know, Paris and Kim’s tapes were also leaked by the males, Ray Jay and whoever the other fuck head is with Paris. You obviously missed the Paris lawsuit or didn’t realize Kardashian was pissed on (not something she’d want public) Bottom line: BRING ON THE NEXT ONE! I will LOLz if this shit’s true!!

    Reply
  196. JamesT said on April 11th, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    WOW … THANKS FOR THE DESCRIPTION..
    WHERE’S THE TAPE AVAILABLE ?… i WANNA DOWNLOAD IT NOW :-) .

    ALSO, GROW UP ALL THE SEXUALLY REPRESSED RETARDS- HUMAN BEINGS ARE JUST NOT MEANT TO BE MONOGAMOUS /STUCK TO ONE PERSON FOR LIFE/CASTRATED VIA MARRIAGE…. NEITHER MEN- NOR WOMEN..
    SO STOP ALL THE SOB STORIES ABOUT PEOPLE TRAPPED IN THE UNNATURAL INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE
    WANTING SOMETHING NORMAL FOR A CHANGE -I.E. SEXUAL V A R I E T Y !.

    BOTH IN TERMS OF OTHER PEOPLE AND WITH ROLE PLAYING/POSITIONS !.

    ALSO NO SEXUAL ACT THAT IS BY MUTUAL CONSENT IS “BAD”..

    IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE IT, DON’T..
    FEEL FREE TO GO LIVE IN IRAQ IN A CAVE.. !. THE CULTURE WILL PROBABLY SUIT YOU BETTER THERE.
    ALSO MIGHT HELP YOU GET USED TO YOUR AVERSION OF DIRTY DARK HOLES :-) !

    Reply
  197. Klownfist said on April 12th, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    First off… I am a male… 41 years old… First time poster…. All that I can say about this post is that if it is true then… I can’t help but think that this screams “What a woman will do to please a man!!!” Now if SB is really into this sort of behavior then it is what it is, and who knows… she so might have a very kinky side. I personally feel for her… to have to endure such a roller coaster ride of emotions and experiences. I don’t wish it on aybody. Look… we all fall short of the Glory of God. What we do behind closed doors really happens and only God can truly judge us for it. No matter how we see it. If you record it… then that is something you have to deal with when things go wrong. I have sooooo much opinion about this that I can’t even write it all here. Believe me part of me wants to see the tape and part of me wants it to all just go away. IMO.. if this tape is real then it shows that Sandra had to know to some extent what JJ was all about all along and then maybe things just snowballed way farther than she signed on for. Now wether she just “overlooked” things about JJ just in the name of love and happiness remains to be seen. I do feel that she may have been manipulated or convinced to particpate in such acts but then again, people are into some really weird things. JJ might have just tapped into Sandra’s dark side and exploited it for it’s worth. C’mon… dirty talk during sex is sooooooooooo freaking powerful that it can actually change the way you think and feel about things. The next thing you know… feces are being used as entertainment. Something you would never EVEN consider before. Well… unfortunately SB and JJ have ALOT to sort out… not only with the lawyers and their family and friends but most of all…. with themselves and God. Plus what about those children of JJ’s. Something of this magnitude, if it’s true, will for certain trickle it’s way to those children’s concience. And for that i feel for all innocnet involved. God speed to both SB and JJ. WE ALL have alot to answer for in Judgement… remember that.

    Reply
  198. Mike said on April 13th, 2010 at 5:31 am

    This is brilliant! Nice one Ian. What a dirty skank.
    What’s that smell?! Oh, it’s just Sandra’s top lip…

    Reply
  199. what dose it matter said on April 22nd, 2010 at 6:16 am

    ok ive read all these post and wonder what diffence will it make if it is true. i mean i dont watch a movie and think wow i wounder if they have a sex tape. i mean how many of you have never done something you may not be so proud of. who here would like their life picked apart by someone who don’t even know them. how would you like it if someone followed you around and saw everything you done. who here could say that in the course of their life they haven’t done something that people could make fun or put you down about. i think it just makes people feel better to know that the people they look up to are not perfect

    Reply
  200. ultrasound technician said on May 8th, 2010 at 3:05 am

    This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!

    Reply
  201. Wolfette said on May 13th, 2010 at 6:02 am

    Hmmm May 13th and just like I thought Ian tanked with this story no truth to any of it not even the tapes that some were hoping were out there,well Ian IF you had a reputation of any standing its gone now!On a lighter note Way To go SB you are off his front page now.even the racial stuff is not sticking,wonder why????

    Reply
  202. physician assistant said on June 18th, 2010 at 8:04 am

    Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

    Reply
  203. MarxM said on July 7th, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    Tits or GTFO! Who cares, it was a celebrity marriage and a botched one at that. Bring on the poo!

    Reply
  204. Benjamin Barker said on July 13th, 2010 at 7:52 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Ian,I think you have a kinda sick imaganation! And how many farious kind of anal sex are there anyway?
    And…a friend of both Sandra and Jesse…erm,would you really tell a friend about a video like that if there was one in the first place? Hey,everybody has there sex fantasies,but you leave them at home,and not tell a so-called friend! Ian,if you really feel the need to write about Sandra,please tell something that is true,like how a great mom she is to Louis! Adopting a boy when you are over 40 to give the boy a great life,that is what I call news and worth writing about. Keep up the good motherhood,Sandy,and give King Louis a hugg from Benji!

    Reply
  205. joe said on August 19th, 2010 at 5:38 am

    @lurkeyloo:
    Does Sandra deserve better? I don’t know. Maybe someone who would let a guy ass-fuck her and smear shit on her face while holding a shotgun and dressed like Hitler in leather deserves someone who would ass-fuck her and smear shit on her face while holding a shotgun and dressed like Hitler in leather. I don’t think she could find anyone better for her, unless Benjamin Bratt comes out as a Mapplethorpe fan turned neo-Nazi porn star. Some people are just made for each other.

    Reply
  206. sinker said on February 18th, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    blind gossip . c o m is now carrying an identical blind.
    Gross Details Behind the Mexican Standoff

    Reply
  207. Ed Gauthier said on March 30th, 2011 at 5:36 pm

    Of course since the effects of their divorce case are still raging, James is denying his “ace in the hole” video collection until the proper time, while America sweetheart Bullock denies it even exists. (Or maybe he just hidden-cammed her.)

    At any rate, a person would have to be clinically insane to assume that although James had crazy sex with at least four other women behind Bullock’s back, he still incredibly NEVER even once switched on a hidden camera to video some dirty humping with Bullock.

    That would be like saying a murderer would never lie.

    Reply
  208. Paxil without a prescription said on May 3rd, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    Good luck getting people behind this one. Though you make some VERY fascinating points, youre going to have to do more than bring up a few things that may be different than what weve already heard. What are trying to say here? What do you want us to think? It seems like you cant really get behind a unique thought. Anyway, thats just my opinion.

    Reply
  209. Flagyl said on May 4th, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    You gave tremendous positive points there. I did a search on the topic and found most peoples will agree with your blog.

    Reply
  210. anketle kazan said on May 6th, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    Really great, that was so hot.

    Reply
  211. Pattie Dampier said on May 15th, 2011 at 12:25 am

    Awesome post. I so good to see someone taking the time to share this information

    Reply
  212. Curtis Tanaka said on August 15th, 2011 at 9:34 am

    I’ve been checking your blog for a while now, seems like everyday I learn something new :-) Thanks

    Reply
  213. Marica Comnick said on August 19th, 2011 at 11:35 pm

    Thanks for posting. Good to see that not everyone is using RSS feeds to build their blogs ;)

    Reply
  214. Elroy Burdge said on August 20th, 2011 at 10:55 am

    Hello, this is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting in your blog especially on how to determine the topic. keep up the good work.

    Reply
  215. Marcos Victory said on August 21st, 2011 at 9:48 am

    I was just having a conversation over this I am glad I came across this it cleared some of the questions I had.

    Reply
  216. Leo Blesofsky said on September 8th, 2011 at 8:16 pm

    This post makes a lot of sense !

    Reply
  217. Pattie Dampier said on September 16th, 2011 at 7:06 am

    Intriguing post. I have been searching for some good resources for solar panels and discovered your blog. Planning to bookmark this one!

    Reply
  218. Tanisha Doescher said on October 19th, 2011 at 8:30 pm

    I’ve just started off a blog, the knowledge you give on this site has aided me extremely. Thank you for all your time & work.

    Reply
  219. Jayson Breitling said on October 23rd, 2011 at 5:51 am

    Great read. Thanks for the info!

    Reply
  220. Williams Feusier said on October 26th, 2011 at 11:26 pm

    Of course, what a great site and informative posts, I will add backlink – bookmark this site? Regards, Reader

    Reply
  221. some donkey said on May 16th, 2012 at 9:02 pm

    @borgqueen:

    really?

    If these mindless, brutal, animalistic, Nazi-loving, plastic, hypocritical pigs – alleged – are dumb enough to record that shit, the whole world should know. Fuck ‘em. If, however, they were sharing something like a human, feeling and intimate sexual encounter, to release the video of that would be in bad taste, only because it’s some sort of violation of something delicate.

    Reply
  222. prostitute said on November 2nd, 2013 at 1:04 pm

    Thanks in support of sharing such a fastidious opinion,
    piece of writing is fastidious, thats why i have read it completely

    Reply
  223. [...] del matrimonio. El contenido, altamente pornográfico, serían escenas de sexo anal de la pareja. En una de las escenas James, entre cuyas amantes hay alguna con esvásticas tatuadas, aparecería caracterizado como [...]

  224. [...] sex with his superstar wife Sandra Bullock, according to a bombshell new report. The alleged tape reportedly includes James smearing feces on Bullock’s upper lip during various types of anal sex, lots of [...]

  225. [...] if it does exist, Halperin says it looks like this – and this is very NSFW: IUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James [...]

  226. [...] a close friend of Bullock told IUC. Meanwhile, pandemonium broke out over the weekend after IUC broke an exclusive about a sordid sex tape that James intends to release if Bullock files for divorce. Bullock’s [...]

  227. [...] (You can read the whole description here, not sure if you want to) [...]

  228. [...] James “sporting a Hitler mustache and a swastika” during anal sex, Ian Halperin writes on Ian Undercover. Allegedly the video also contains anal sex and the smearing of feces on the [...]

  229. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Conrado, Beelzebozo. Beelzebozo said: How funny would this be if true! http://ianundercover.com/2010/04/02/iuc-world-exclusive-sex-tape-could-ruin-bullocks-career/ [...]

  230. uberVU - social comments said on April 5th, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by nataSatan: How funny would this be if true! http://ianundercover.com/2010/04/02/iuc-world-exclusive-sex-tape-could-ruin-bullocks-career/…

  231. [...] this bit of news with a huge grain of salt, but ianundercover.com is claiming the existence of a sex tape involving Jesse James and Sandra Bullock, that [...]

  232. Sandra Bullock Sex Tape “Leaked”? « CONSPIRAPORN! said on April 5th, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    [...] James “sporting a Hitler mustache and a swastika” during anal sex, Ian Halperin writes on Ian Undercover. For the full story, which gets decidedly more disgusting than that little tidbit—don’t read [...]

  233. Meet Michelle 'Bombshell' McGee - Page 4 said on April 5th, 2010 at 8:16 pm

    [...] [...]

  234. Anal Sex With Sandra Bullock? I Call Bullshit. said on April 6th, 2010 at 8:57 am

    [...] in all honesty, it’s a rumor started by Ian Undercover.  Can you really trust a man in a shiny green leprechaun shirt?  So, well played, Mr. U.  I bet [...]

  235. [...] we first came across the Sandra Bullock sex tape story yesterday we laughed because it was so insane. But people keep writing about it and since we [...]

  236. [...] else catch this…. perhaps the reason why SB is hesitant to drop divorce papers IUC World Exclusive: Sex Tape Could Ruin Bullock’s Career IUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James [...]

  237. Sandra Bullock Sex Tape, Pregnancy and Divorce | A2Z News said on April 6th, 2010 at 11:32 am

    [...] sex tape floating around. (This is the same guy who penned a “Brangelina” book.) He claims: “IUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James smearing [...]

  238. [...] Bullock as a Nazi anal banging whore. But again I need to be more open minded of these bitches: IUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James smearing feces on [...]

  239. [...] A Comment Sandy, say it ain’t so! Journalist Ian Halperin is reporting on his website IanUndercover that Jesse James has a sex tape of him doing some pretty nasty things with wife Sandra Bullock. I [...]

  240. [...] sex tape floating around. (This is the same guy who penned a “Brangelina” book.) He claims: “IUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James smearing [...]

  241. [...] we first came across the Sandra Bullock sex tape story yesterday we laughed because it was so insane. But people keep writing about it and since we [...]

  242. [...] has been using the back door far more often that you could ever imagine. Yep, that’s right. Sandra Bullock’s alleged sex tape includes everything from an authentic Dirty Sanchez to Nazi role play. Is it really possible that [...]

  243. [...] sex tape floating around. (This is the same guy who penned a “Brangelina” book.) He claims: “IUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James smearing [...]

  244. [...] [...]

  245. Tweets that mention oh no Sandy RT Whoa: -- Topsy.com said on April 6th, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ohman4. ohman4 said: oh no Sandy RT @kristapley: Whoa: http://twurl.nl/jn2bc4 [...]

  246. » Blog Archive » Are You Kidding Me? said on April 6th, 2010 at 8:46 pm

    [...] sex tape, which is disgustingly described on this website IUC, is what “Bullocks’ handlers” were looking for when they entered the home that [...]

  247. Sandra Bullock Sex Tape, Pregnancy and Divorce said on April 7th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    [...] sex tape floating around. (This is the same guy who penned a “Brangelina” book.) He claims: “IUC confirmed late last night that Jesse James has the goods on his wife. It includes James smearing [...]

  248. [...] her part, Bullock denied today the existence of a sex tape. What she has not yet addressed are Halperin's allegations of sex that was beyond kinky, but would probably be considered downright offensive by most." [...]

  249. Sandra Bullock: Sex Tape Claims Denied | CelebWhoIs.info said on April 8th, 2010 at 12:00 pm

    [...] personalities. Apparently, this juicy nugget of celebrity gossip was fabricated by Ian Halperin of Ianundercover.com. Mr. Halperin is notorious for creating buzz around bullshit and making up stories when there is [...]

  250. [...] IUC World Exclusive: Sex Tape Could Ruin Bullock's Career [...]

  251. [...] graphic sex, tons of profanity and some S&M, performed while James is in Nazi regalia. Click HERE for the very NSFW [...]

  252. [...] mantenía relaciones sexuales extremas con su ex marido. De acuerdo a una publicación en el sitio ianundercover.com, este video de sexo explícito podría salir a la luz y arruinar la carrera de [...]

  253. 10 videos XXX de famosas con consecuencias | Biendateao said on July 11th, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    [...] mantenía relaciones sexuales extremas con su ex marido. De acuerdo a una publicación en el sitio ianundercover.com, este video de sexo explícito podría salir a la luz y arruinar la carrera de [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2010
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Meta