IUC Exclusive: Sandra Bullock Has Too Many Skeletons!!!!

Posted on March 26th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

bullock-jamesLast week during my Sirius Radio segment on Opie and Anthony I predicted the Jesse James saga would reach Tiger Woods proportions once women started coming out with tales of sexcapades with him. Since I made my prediction four women came out. Why hasn’t Sandra filed for divorce???? It’s obvious James has something very incriminating on her, something that has probably been in her closet for years. Developing…

  1. Lizzy said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:38 am

    Does this mean you know there is something in her closet?

    I kind of thought she was just classy and staying out of the media until the stories died down and then make her decision. I imagine it would be difficult to decide in a week how you were going to handle a situation like this – especially with the children involved that it seems Sandra loves very much. I can’t even imagine how crushing it must be to know that you’re husband put on a show for you through a five year marriage. But then again who really knows… this is Hollyweird!

    Reply
  2. Lizzy said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:38 am

    Actually Ted did have on his B-Back today that Sandra is a Blind Vice…anyone know which she may be?

    Reply
  3. lurkeyloo said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:56 am

    I assume by the “closet” comment you are insinuating she is gay or bi….I realy doubt this is true. Don’t know why…I just do. Ian, and a lot of people really, seem to sling that label around excessively.

    Reply
  4. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:24 am

    I must say that I dislike the attempt to turn this situation around on it’s victim. Sandra Bullock James is the wife whose husband committed adultry numerous time , unprotected sexual encounters with various women of questional reputation. Jesse cheated, broke his vows, as well as his promise to Sandy. The ho’s involved are coming out strictly for free publicity as apparently they are proud to be whores and skanks with no moral values and even lesser reputations for it. To try to make it Sandy’s fault is an insult to her, and to all women who have ever been in a committed relationship. It is not the norm for a partner to cheat, and it is not the acceptable social norm for the cheater to become a hero, or heroine (a la Jolie) for their lack of decency. I say leave Sandy out of this. It’s not like she’s a Lady Ga Ga type yano….geesh

    Reply
  5. ladybert62 said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:25 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Right on Pattyanne! :D

    Reply
  6. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:32 am

    Thank you. I just think it’s time we , as a society, stand up for what is right, and show these cheaters and their ho’s, male and/or female, that it’s not something to be proud of, or to make money from. Tiger’s whores, Jesse’s whores and yes, Brad Pitt’s whore should be ashamed and not so damn proud of their lack of morals or even decency.@ladybert62:

    Reply
  7. lurkeyloo said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:09 am

    You said it, girl!!!! @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  8. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:15 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Pattyanne, my mother always used to tell me no man is going to walk away from a woman who is shall I say, throwing themselves at them. Whether it is people like us or stars, same thing. The people to blame are the skanky whores out there looking for their 15 minutes of fame….doing the talk show circus, etc. If I were in with the mix, and trust me I never would be, I would be ashamed and hiding out not putting my pic of every tabloid and selling out. Just remember also, the WOMAN always, always are the ones that can say NO no matter who the person is…..skanky whores just disgust me!

    Reply
  9. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:16 am

    PS and what is UP with all these disgusting men not wearing condoms??????

    Reply
  10. Lizzy said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:42 am

    @Emerson:
    Very true, the messed up thing is that reports are saying Jesse was on the internet LOOKING for other women. That’s just sick. And I agree it is probably harder for a man to say no to a woman throwing herself at him but if they are truly in love and loyal they can walk away. Or better yet – if you know that is going to happen – as all celebrities do – don’t let yourself be put in that situation if you truly have respect for your spouse. There are genuine mistakes men & women can make in relationships and Tiger & Jesse are well beyond a mistake or being sorry. The other women, I just really have no words, they have no self-respect. Whatever void they are looking to fill is going to be just as large if not larger once the public chews them up and spits them out.

    Reply
  11. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:48 am

    This is what I can’t stand about the media on one hand they appear to be against homophobia but constant want to ruin people and shame them for having gay secrets. On one day Ian attacking the Mormons for being anti-gay and then he wants to hint about Bullock’s private life as if her being a lesbo is some sick dark secret. Unless Sandy’s into Cinnabun their pitbull,or is into Hitler what has she done to offend thee Mr. Halperin. Since you’re such an open-minded liberal ?

    Reply
  12. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:54 am

    @Lizzy
    I think Tiger and Jesse are the new normal. This isn’t just happening in Hollywood. People are just pieces of shit. They simply don’t give a f-ck.It’s that simple.

    Reply
  13. sela said on March 26th, 2010 at 12:15 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    @Pattyanne:

    Ditto … Thank You!

    And Ian (Really!? What?) …. even if she has already decided to divorce the dick head, she certainly would not announce it publicly at this point. Haven’t you heard?… She loves his children. That alone would keep her from making a quick decision with little thought about their future well-being (not to mention the logical and intelligent response of taking her time to get thorough legal, family, and business counselling).

    Reply
  14. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    @Lizzy:
    I just think these women have no self respect whatsoever, they are out for their 15 minutes of fame, and ya know, why are these men sooooooo stupid? Seriouslly? Do these “celebrity” men not think that whores have ulterior motives? If I were in their shoes (and thank God I’m not!) the first thing I would think would be “ummm what are these women trying to get from me?” They take the chances of having non condom sex, which opens a whole other can of worms! Do they not know that is how women get pregnant? ala Jude Law??? I’m just shocked at the stupidity of both the men and the whores, and yes, I consider them nothing but whores…if you sell your story to a tabloid, if you hire a “high power” attorney (and I say that with a laugh, then you are out for money/fame…and in MY book that equals whores….

    Reply
  15. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on March 26th, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Gloria Allred is clearly incapable of working for someone who isn’t a skank. These scandals are just going to make it easier on men. Now if a man cheats with one woman and uses and condom he’ll be considered a hero.

    Reply
  16. Tamara said on March 26th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    This post is a total bunch of BS – who gives a chyt what her secrets are…she kept her private life private until her cheating scumbag of a so called husband decided to show himself for the scum he is….Im with Patty Anne on this one all the way – JJ should be ashamed of himself. Personally I could care less if she is straight bi or gay – it does not and will not ever change my perception of her as a great actress, a humanitarian, animal lover, private person who doesn’t use her personal life for promotion in her career. She is the same person she was two weeks ago, don’t I repeat don’t turn this around and make it all her fault!! Really, I am sick to death of all this pap stalking – all they could say was Where’s Sandy – well, IMO that is NO ONEs business but hers!! She has never courted the publicity when things were good and she sure doesn’t need it now, so I say leave the poor girl alone!!! JMHO

    Reply
  17. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on March 26th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    That b-tch Jolie back on the balcony with both twins this time. What a nutjob. Apparently Knox is really Vivienne or vice versa. Who really gives a flying f-ck? This time she’s got some mannish looking Asian nanny with her and it looks somebody made her comb but she still looks bad. Why does look so old all of a sudden, like theirs no moisture in her face,

    Reply
  18. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on March 26th, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    Isn’t it kind of sad that Miley Cyrus has better taste in men than Bullock,Jolie,Hudson,Spears,Simpson and Aniston. Yeesh!

    Reply
  19. too curious said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:04 pm

    Ian, I am appalled at this post. No one deserves to be cheated on, exposed to STDs and other contagious diseases, and publicly humiliated. IF you are saying that SHE cheated first then it still isn’t right, as the saying goes, 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

    Between you being so sympathetic to Jolie and so misogynistic toward other women I am starting to feel unwelcome here. You DO realize that most of your posters are women, right??

    Reply
  20. too curious said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    Pattyanne, I definitely agree, I am so tired of these skanks being rewarded.

    We saw a picture of Bombshell-whatever-her-name is the other day and my husband said “OMG, just looking at her picture I feel like I should put on a condom just to be safe {from whatever she might be carrying}” LOL

    Reply
  21. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    LMAO that was funny!

    Reply
  22. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    I don’t think we should be blaming the “whores” more than the “men”. They’re all whores, and both deserving of all the negativity coming to them. And it is NOT harder for a man to say no simply because he’s a man; that’s just society doing what it does best. I have a very healthy sexual appetite, yet I don’t run around chasing every piece of ass I can get. And who’s to say that all of these women are throwing themselves at the men. The men could very well be the pursuer. We know that Jesse has a history of sexually harassing women, so… Sorry, I just have an issue with explaining things in simplistic ways like that.

    I wouldn’t even care about these stories if it weren’t for the fact that there are kids in both cases. That officially makes you scum in my book. And to not use condoms (especially with Tiger, who was cavorting around condomlessly while impregnating his wife) makes you beneath scum.

    With regards to Ian’s post, I think he’s merely trying to hint that there’s more to this story that meets the eye, though I do disagree with turning this situation against Bullock. I also don’t believe that Jesse has anything on her; I think she’s just biding her time and trying to act in the best interest of the kids. She has been extremely quiet, not even the obligatory “Please respect my privacy” statement (unless I’m just forgetting, which could be the case). Still, there may be something else that we don’t know. IMO, that’s her business. As Tamara said, she’s not like Jolie and others who flaunt their daily lives for publicity. I’m a long-time fan of her’s, and as long as she hasn’t done something horrendous, I’ll most likely continue to be. But we can’t get all up in arms and act as if this isn’t what Ian does. We don’t have any complaints when he reveals information about other people, so I think it’s unfair to pick and choose. He’s not just a Brangie biographer/revealer, he is a celebrity investigative reporter. Just because he may or may not be privy to some secrets of the “good guys” doesn’t mean that if he tells we have to stop liking them. Ian doesn’t have that much power. We can know the truth and not abandon our beloved stars.

    Reply
  23. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    @too curious:
    I didn’t take from Ian’s blurb that Sandra was gay or bi or whatever, maybe I’m naive…but I agree with you 100% ummmmm condoms condoms condoms people!! These are rough, disgusting looking women and let’s not forget the porn stars, ewwwwwwwwww, any man with any amount of self respect would at the very least use a condom!

    Reply
  24. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    @ Lauren
    Only whores get swastika tats right above their coochies.Yuck. These women knew these men were married and I’m not really defending SandyB. cuz do you honestly think a guy who was married to a porn star and is used to porn star sex is gonna be faithful to Miss Congeniality? Please.

    Reply
  25. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    @Lauren:
    Men are defineteley pigs, (some of them), BUT the woman has the right to say NO, it’s her body, no one has mentioned rape, and therefore they are more to blame….is Jesse a pig? YEP AND, selfish beyond belief for putting his 3 children in the middle of his what mid life crisis? They adore Sandra, and how awfully sad this whole situation is for them, and for what? Because Jesse was “bored” when Sandra was working? PALEEZE If someone hits on me, I am fully responsible for the decision I make…no one else. Hence, that is why I would never do a married man, I, as a woman, make that conscience decision to 1. hey let’s have fun no matter who gets hurt, and b. ya know, I was raised to be a little more self respecting, so sorry just not interested….it’s really that simple. I have married men hit on me all the time, and no way do I go near them….these skanks wanted their 15 minutes of fame, and Jesse is just the dirtbag to give it to them…it could have easily been an actor, musician, etc., their choice would still be the same. This shows their morals or lack thereof, and “bombshell” although she looks 50 to me, is such a lady with her latest postings on myspace and twitter, wow Jesse picked a winner there!

    Reply
  26. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Also, let’s not be naive or think Sandra is naive. She’s known what kind of guy Jesse was for a long time now. She got married a man that was married to a porn star for goodness sakes. He’s had a couple of sexual harassment lawsuits that have settled out of court for hundreds of thousands of dollars, one before and one during their marriage. IMO, she had to have had some sort of inclination about Jesse’s indiscretions. What I want to know is why didn’t she do anything? If it was about the kids, she could have collected enough information about Jesse and cajoled him into some sort of agreement that would allow her to continue to be a part of their lives, if he otherwise wouldn’t let her.

    Again, I’m a fan of Bullock. Hell, I even loved Hope Floats! She can be of any sexual persuasion or whatever, as long as she’s not hurting people or a sociopath or something like that, then I’ll probably continue to be a fan and support her movies. But I, personally, am not going to blindly protect her because she was the woman wronged. Yes, Jesse is to blame. Sandra is not. No one, man or woman, deserves to be lied to or cheated on in their relationship. Both parties should be mature enough to amicably end the relationship if they become a little too interested in other people. But all of this doesn’t answer the questions that I have about Bullock and her marriage. Why stay with him if he’s always been a dog? And if it was out of love, why not just stick by his side now, address the media and say that you are staying with your man and your family, and shut down the media circus as far as you’re involved? The media wouldn’t have any room left to dig. Just like David Letterman for example; he addressed it before anyone else, took responsibility, and was in control of the situation before it could spiral out of control.

    Reply
  27. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    And these men knew that they were married. Again, both are whores.

    Reply
  28. ladybert62 said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @Tamara:
    Dang, I love it when you get riled up Tamara! Go Girl! :D

    Reply
  29. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @Emerson:
    So the women are more to blame even though Jesse put his sexual desires before the lives and wellbeing of his own children? That seems even more morally reprehensible to me than vice versa, IMO. I just disagree with putting more of the blame and responsibility of a man’s mistakes and lack of judgment on the woman he cheated with. He knew what he was doing, he knew he had kids and a wife at home, and he didn’t care. Simple as that. We’re also assuming everyone in the world knows who Jesse James is. If he’d gone to Argentina and cheated with 100 women that didn’t know him or the fact that he was married, we would still be calling them whores? Yeah, these women knew, but whether they did or not wouldn’t have stopped Jesse from being the selfish lowlife that he is. Women have the right to say no, but men also have the right to not try it in the first place. It’s a matter of opinion, however, and I just respectfully disagree with yours.

    Reply
  30. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    @Lauren:
    And men have the right, and ability, to say no if they’re approached.

    Reply
  31. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    ” It’s obvious James has something very incriminating on her, something that has probably been in her closet for years. ”
    This is what I found so offensive about Ian’s thread. Why is it “obvious” Jesse has something, cough, cough, very incriminating on his wife? Because she didn’t come out and have a strip-off against Dudshell McJokey?, because she didn’t run to the paps and cry, rip out her hair, call Jesse a bastErd? Nope. She’s keeping her private life pravate as she has always done. It was this McGee whore who’s ex-hubby stated in a recent interview went for Jesse with the intent of garnering fame and money from the coupling. It was she who contacted the press with her story knowing full well it would be crushing to Sandy to find out. From what I am gathering Jesse James is a low life who can’t keep his dick in his pants, let alone consider his wife’s health by wearing protection. In no way does this brand Sandra Bullock guilty by loving and trusting the man she called her husband, and thanked when receiving her Best Actress Oscar for, “Always having my back. Before you I never knew what that was like.” If you take a minute to try to put yourself into Sandy’s shoes, I think you will recognize her profound pain upon this discovery. We watched the evil whore Jolie begin a campaign to destroy the wife in the marriage she destroyed, lets not sit quietly by and allow a repeat.

    Reply
  32. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    Haven’t had chance to read all the comments but I think what Ian means is that it was a fauxmance and that Sandra was perfectly happy for JJ to shag whoever he chose because he wasn’t her type! It’s just another HW sham.

    Reply
  33. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    I just feel it’s poor taste to attack the wife immediately after her hubby is outed by MacJokey and the said wife is publicly humiliated and embarrassed. Poor taste imo@keane cyber queen supreme:

    Reply
  34. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    @Lauren:
    hey, I did call him a pig, and I do think he is one, BUT I just will always believe the woman should be the one to say NO. I travel for my business a LOT and there are always pigs, or successful businessmen, or nice workers in hotels, etc., and ya know what? I say no WAY simply because I don’t know who they are, or where they’ve been, or if they are married. These skanks knew who he was and they knew exactly what they were doing, and that is why I call them whores. Jesse is a pig, especially for putting innocent childrent into this mix, and unfortunately in HW this seems to be the norm….no one thinks of the children. I will never back down from saying that the woman has the final say, I’ve been there many times…plus who would EVER sleep with some stranger without a condom??? That is just filth on both their parts….jmo…

    Reply
  35. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I would be devastated, and I saw all those acceptance speaches, and no way, in my book, were they faked…no way…I would be doing the same as she is and hide out for a good long time and try to heal…

    Reply
  36. I'm on the bidet said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    I was thinking something similar, but wasn’t sure what activities by Sandra would need to have a faux marriage where Jesse is the beard (or is it ‘merkin’)? It seems like overkill to hide being a lesbian, if that’s what she’s worried about – why not just publicly date guys for publicity, around the time of a movie release, without all the overhead of a marriage?

    I suppose if you are a lesbian, but want a sham marriage for the sake of publicity, you would want a guy who is 1) a known heterosexual, and 2) someone not expecting sex within the marriage, i.e. someone willing/wanting to sleep around, and you just hope they don’t get caught.

    As for Sandra not knowing about his philandering, she seems pretty smart to be so dumb. It bespeaks people already living separate lives if she doesn’t know about the numerous affairs, and the ‘love is blind’ rationale only is credible for modest amounts of infidelity. In short, I don’t get it, but I’m interested to see what spin Bullock’s team puts on the whole thing . . . I’m guessing a rapid divorce, then Sandra refuses to talk about it for several years.

    Reply
  37. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    But Patty Anne, don’t you see? The only thing Sandra is probably feeling right now is humiliation, but that is of her own choosing. I think it is quite obvious that she is not into men and had an arrangement with this guy to disguise that. I don’t think she will be dealing with any other emotion right now apart from anger with herself for picking such a tool to beard for her! Just like Brange, TomKat et al, it’s just a game for publicity, nothing more, nothing less.

    Reply
  38. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    @Emerson:

    I don’t think that’s the deal at all, I think she was faking that to keep up her image and the only devastation she is feeling right now is of the “oh shit, what has this done to my career” kind. These people make millions of dollars, they are big businesses. The only pain she will be feeling right now is in her purse – I can assure you!

    Reply
  39. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I agree with your opinion about that line. But how often do we react that way about all the other things that are ultimately Ian’s opinions. Until he, or someone else, provides the proof, that’s all his posts will be. I know that he provides a lot of information, but the stories he posts here– no matter how accurate they may be– are still his opinion until we see some evidence. I’m not discounting his work, but that’s how journalism is. So it is his opinion (I think it should read “It is obvious to ME…”) that Jesse has something incriminating on Sandra. I just don’t think all this defensiveness is necessary just because we like her. He didn’t make any outrageous claim… yet. If you disagree with what he says, that, too, is your opinion. Personally, I say either way just wait and see what comes out.

    Furthermore, I’m not denying that Sandra is pained by her husband’s actions. I also agree with you that we shouldn’t blame her for ANY of this. However, what I’m saying is that this has been a long-time coming. We can’t deny this. I just don’t see why all of this should make a difference now when Jesse has been through sexual harassment suits, texting and e-mailing his exes and other women, etc…. I don’t think she was blind to that. Sandra’s a smart woman, she had to have known something was going on. Again I’ll state that what I, and this just may be me, want to know is why she didn’t do anything sooner. If it was because of the kids, I’m sure that she could have worked some sort of arrangement out with Jesse to allow her to at least spend time and be a positive influence in their lives. Maybe I’m wrong. But none our opinions should take away from the fact that Jesse’s been doing this for a long time, just like Tiger, except that there is actually legal evidence of his actions. If she stuck around for the kids, that’s very admirable. But what’s changed now. If she still wants to stick around for the kids, she needs to be actively protective of her family right now and let the media know that she’s working things out with Jesse for the sake of the children, and that she’s going to be committed to him and the kids. Alongside that, Jesse needs to show initiative that he’s truly sorry, takes full responsibility, and that he is proactive in changing. It doesn’t have to be some long pr circuit or media blitz. Be a strong woman and say what you are going to do, why, and tell the media to stay the f*ck out of it. They won’t, as we all know, but they won’t have nearly as much to work with. As it stands, all the hub-bub is regarding whether or not she’s leaving him. If she effectively addresses that just once, she can further protect her privacy. Again, David Letterman did it, and he was the adulterer.

    And I honestly don’t think that the women coming out of these types of scandals will be able to pull a Jolie. Angelina had long been shifting her image into this humanitarian earthmother sex goddess. She had the team and the means to portray Jen as an inadequate woman. But there’s long been a history of blaming the victim in many things, so this is nothing new. I’m all for shaming those who need it, but that’s not my issue here. My issue is that I find it interesting that she stayed with this d*ck after all that he’s done, but that’s changed now. Did she just get fed up? That’s possible, but I don’t know. I’m just trying to find out.

    Reply
  40. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    @Emerson:
    I agree with you that the approached should say no. I can’t ever see myself getting with an involved man, not unless it was an open relationship and I was pretty desperate. But I just think that we should put more accountability on the men. They shouldn’t act like pigs in the first place. Don’t even present a situation in which a woman will say yes to you. There will always be someone, even if it’s just one person, who will say yes. IMO, it’s just more efficient/effective to shame the pigs than to try to make sure everyone says no. No pigs, no problem.

    Reply
  41. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    I think that a long-term relationship is actually less work on her part – less men to contract, less photo opps to do – and we have to remember she wasn’t doing that much in the acting vein until The Blind Side came out, she was more of a Producer. Perhaps she didn’t want to sell stories about her relationships to the highest bidder, so she just kept it quiet and neatly deflected all questions about her possible sexual orientation by, like you say, a convenient merkin! (By the way, that is definitely my new favourite IUC buzzword!)

    Reply
  42. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:35 pm

    I suppose I’m just naive then to believe that Sandra simply fell in love with Jesse and married him with the intention of creating a family. She has never struck me as the type of person who would engage in such subterfuge to hide her leaning toward the same sex, but would rather be an Ellen and say it is what it is, now let me get back to work. I’ve never heard a whisper about Sandy being less than open and honest, albeit she is private in her personal life.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  43. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    To lighten the mood a wee bit, I found this on youtube. Dog eats bumper off police car video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gE5tVs4v8bE&feature=player_embedded

    Reply
  44. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Posted Mar 26th 2010 11:50AM by TMZ Staff

    Michelle “Boobie” McGee has figured out yet another way to make money off of Sandra Bullock’s pain. She’s fired up a website where you can look at what Jesse James allegedly saw … for the appropriate price of $9.95.

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/#ixzz0jK29d4aE
    @Pattyanne:

    No need for me to say more.

    Reply
  45. chris said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    i don’t understand how these women can come public when there’s children involved. how can they look their reflection in the mirror knowing they destroyed kid’s childhood. it’s just sordid.

    Reply
  46. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Ellen also faked it, kept quiet about it for a long time before coming out. Actually, correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t she kind of forced out in some way by someone? Let’s face it, there aren’t exactly that many openly gay women in showbiz still. I mean Oprah has been lying about it for years, who else really is there apart from Ellen/Portia and KD Lang? Sandra like Jennifer Aniston has made her business out of being an America’s Sweetheart type figure, and like Aniston it would be career death for her to come out. JMO

    Reply
  47. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    http://www.celebitchy.com/95789/racist_jesse_james_has_nazi_memorabilia_including_surfboard_whitler_on_it/

    Why would she even be attracted to someone like this. She deserves, and can do, better. Who would be a good fit for her, I wonder?

    Reply
  48. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    http://www.celebitchy.com/95789/racist_jesse_james_has_nazi_memorabilia_including_surfboard_whitler_on_it/

    How could she even be attracted to someone like him? She deserves, and can do, better. I wonder who would be a good fit for her?

    Reply
  49. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    Is there something wrong with the site?

    Reply
  50. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 6:00 pm

    @Lauren:
    I asked that because I tried to submit a link about James’ nazi memorabilia. I guess it just wouldn’t go through because of the link???

    Reply
  51. Lauren said on March 26th, 2010 at 6:21 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    I know I’ve said that I thought there was some kind of arrangement made because of Bullock’s sexuality. I honestly don’t know what her orientation is; I’m not counting anything out. I do wonder, though, why Jesse would marry her when she’s clearly not HIS type. I can understand him maybe thinking he wanted a change and more stability, but then realizing that he was denying who he really is. That’s plausible given the drama he had with his 2nd wife. But that doesn’t really fly because he’d been cheating, or attempting, to the whole time he knew Sandra. The guy has a distinctive type that is basically the opposite of Sandra. It just makes me think even more that there was something other than love at play in this relationship. Don’t doubt that she loved/loves him, but maybe it really was only like a best friend.

    Reply
  52. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 6:27 pm

    @Lauren:

    They had a contract, she was paying him for it I would have thought (as the Nazi stripper said). Just like Jennifer Aniston paid VV, John Mayer and presumably also Gerard. That’s the way it works methinks!

    Reply
  53. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 8:59 pm

    http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/sandra-bullock/sandra-bullock-back-hiding-340599
    “An insider told press, “She’s devastated. She’s beyond upset. And she has every right to be. She was on top of the world with her Oscar victory and now this. It’s such a difficult thing to deal with.”

    “She has a tight circle of friends. They won’t say much about her. They want to protect her. And that’s because she’s been nice to everyone along the way. She’s not stuck up. She doesn’t act like a star. She acts like a normal, sweet person, which is exactly what she is. And that’s why everyone is so loyal to her.”

    Reply
  54. jeannie said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:10 pm

    Well she could be bi but I’m pretty sure she isn’t gay because I know a man who had sex with her while she was in her on/off relationship with Matthew McConaghey

    Reply
  55. Leah said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:23 pm

    Good Lord Keane-you’ve been reading too many blogs that hate Jennifer.lol She and Gerard have said from day one they are good friends.Nothing more-they adore one another but nothing else. As for VV and John Mayer-I actually think by being associated with those two guys she took a huge hit.They both turned out to be bad publicity for her so I don’t believe the contract shite at all. But that is my opinion and you are entitled to yours.I’d like for you to let the lesbian thing about Jennifer go too.Other than a Jolie insider saying that to Ian without any proof..is that what you are basing it on?I have never heard that about Jennifer at all and I have followed her career for years.I truly can’t see Brad marrying her if he thought she was.

    .Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 6:27 pm .
    @Lauren:

    They had a contract, she was paying him for it I would have thought (as the Nazi stripper said). Just like Jennifer Aniston paid VV, John Mayer and presumably also Gerard. That’s the way it works methinks!

    Reply
  56. inOttawa said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Ian, It would be nice if you delivered the goods on your various “developing” stories from time to time! :)

    Reply
  57. mooki said on March 27th, 2010 at 11:21 am

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/john-travolta-on-how-scientology-helped-him-through-jetts-death/story-e6frewyr-1225846391139

    the Travoltas revert back to saying “Kawasaki syndrome” killed Jett…. even though John has already admitted that he had autism. Kelly has him in a really tight grip (she also has a ton of stuff she’s hiding as well, remember when she was w/ Charlie Sheen? two psychos) … just wait until they see Anderson Cooper’s series of stories on the cult next week (then this regurgitation of PR bs will stop).

    Reply
  58. Pattyanne said on March 27th, 2010 at 11:49 am

    We just finished watching The Proposal, Sandra Bullock’s film just before Blindside. She is so natural in her roles, just makes you feel good. Sandy does the Rom/Com so well. There were even four scenes where we laughed so hard our sides ached. I hope she can come out of this devistation with some of the old Sandy intact.

    Reply
  59. mooki said on March 27th, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    ditto w/ Bullock doing rom-coms well, like J. Roberts and M. Ryan (unlike Aniston who plays the same damn role in all of them [i.e. Rachel from Friends])

    Reply
  60. Emerson said on March 27th, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    @Lauren:
    I agree with you 100% I really do! I just have a thing about these skanks/whores jumping in bed with “famous” people just to get their 15 minutes of fame…..had I done the same thing I would be so ashamed! I would definetely hide out somewhere until it all blew over….

    Reply
  61. Emerson said on March 27th, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    I agree! The media has got to stop their insessent skalking and there should be some law put into effect..

    Reply
  62. Emerson said on March 27th, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    ahhh call me a hopeless romantic Keanve….there has to be true love out there somewhere…..I realize that stars promote (spelling?) their films, but not everyone in HW is gay/bi, it just can’t be!!! I won’t alow it!!! lol

    Reply
  63. Emerson said on March 27th, 2010 at 1:45 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I watched both too, and you will never convince me she gay/bi…now don’t get me wrong, I do believe people experiment, but no way is Sandra gay or in the closest….I will never believe that in my lifetime! Just imagine being a part of a family and hoow much she loves those children as well as Jesse….she is devastated! That is obvious from her speaches at the award shows and her seclusion, AND her cancelling all her upcoming events…she is hurting very badly, and that is obvious. I feel for her so much and I read the People article last night and I WAS CRYING!!! I realize the tabloids are just that, but People is a pretty good one (exept for the Brangelina crap)….

    Reply
  64. Emerson said on March 27th, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I also agree with you and really really think Sandra fell head over heals :)

    Reply
  65. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    @Leah:

    Just because Gerard and Jen haven’t publically stated they are in a relationship doesn’t mean they don’t have a contract for publicity. There have been numerous stories about Jen’s relationship with Gerard leaked to the press, written in the typical PR nonsense style. They did a photo opp in Cabo to get people talking and then did the whole staring into each other’s eyes thing at the premieres. Even The Daily Mail picked up on this! VV and Jon Mayer were a bit more full-on with the staged pics of them in intimate situations which can only have been completely set up as they were pretending not to notice the man with the camera when he was stood right in front of them. I do agree with you that the choice of men haven’t done her a lot of favours and if I were advising her I certainly would not have picked any of those options, but I suspect they might have been the best they could get. Oh and Paul Sculfor, who is again gay of course, but at least he was good-looking! There are obviously a limited number of available beards in HW as they all circulate around the same people! So yes, it would have been better if she could have picked better men, but I assume her PR wizards think these ones were better than no men (and obviously therefore no publicity) or maybe publicity of the wrong kind. In this instance, I would say NOT JMO – it’s all pretty obvious!

    Reply
  66. Emerson said on March 27th, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Keane, I love the Daily Mail too, even if I don’t believe some of the things ;)

    Reply
  67. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 5:46 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    You neglected to answer the question on JA’s sexuality, on what do you base that she is bi/gay. Please do not quote a JA bashing tabloid like the Daily Mail as an example of a fake relationship. I read DM daily but consider it one step up from The Sun.

    Reply
  68. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    @latinalady:

    No I didn’t neglect to mention it dear, it was there in that comment – it’s not my fault that you didn’t understand it! Oh and The Daily Mail will be wounded by your comment I’m sure – they speak so highly of you!

    Seriously though can someone tell me what is so bloody awful about being gay all of a sudden and why people get so steamed up and on their high horse about it?! Is being gay supposed to be a really bad thing now? Cos as far as I am concerned being gay is bloody great and if anyone else is of that persuasion I’m bloody happy for them! Also, please can someone tell me why people bother to read a newspaper that they consider to be so beneath them on a daily basis? If it’s beneath you, then why not read something more highbrow on a daily basis, like The Times for example (ha ha!)? Seriously, everyone knows what The Daily Mail’s agenda is, including (of course) the people who write it! It’s a product designed for a specific market. If you are reading it then you are their market, as am I! It has great celebrity coverage, that’s why I read it – and I’m secure enough in my intellectual abilities to have no problem whatsoever in admitting to that! And by the way, if I’ve said it once I’ve said it a thousand times, the exact same journos who write the stories in the broadsheets are writing the stories in The Sun et al. And yes, these are (shock horror) Oxbridge types. This distinction between the supposed intellectual “truth” that is told in the broadsheets and the trashy “lies” that are told in the tabloids is utter BS. The reality is far more complex than that, but you do need a brain to understand that, and I guess that’s the problem.

    Reply
  69. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 6:36 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    There is nothing wrong in being gay, I should know. My family and many friends don’t have a problem with it. It does however get annoying when the bi/gay label gets thrown around when a person is not understood. As a graduate and mother (Cambridge) I know consideration has to be taken in everything we do and say. I too enjoy the Mail’s entertainment and factual topics but would not dream of using them as a source of a hopefully intelligent debate. I don’t consider anything in life to be beneath me as you never know where you will end up, including sleeping under thrash tabloids one day. Unfortunatelly intelligence is not a defence for ingnorance.

    Reply
  70. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    @latinalady:

    Oh so you’re a Cambridge graduate are you? So what did you take and in which college? Maybe we know some of the same people! And I assume by your username you are of South American extraction? How interesting. As an intelligent graduate of one of the world’s most esteemed universities I would be interested to know from where you drew the incorrect assumption that I based my opinion that Jennifer Aniston is probably gay on an article in The Daily Mail? Because I have never said that. I am stunned that someone who has made it through the rigours of a Cambridge education could make such a stupid error in fact – it is highly out of character. So you read The Daily Mail on a daily basis for all of it’s “entertainment and factual” topics (i.e. all of it) but do not believe any of what is written in it or would use it “as a source for a hopefully intelligent debate” hey? Why on earth do you read it then? It would seem like a slightly pointless exercise to me! And what may I ask makes you slum it even further with the likes of us over at IUC by the way, being, as we are, a place known to be the bearer of gossip more trashy than almost anywhere else in the world? If The Daily Mail is only slightly above The Sun in your opinion – which by the tone of your orginial statement would implies somewhere very low – where on earth would we rank?! And yet here you are reading and engaging with what is being written, how curious! And “unfortunately intelligence is no defence for ignorance” was your closing parry – um, no offence, but that sentence doesn’t actually mean anything at all! What was the point you were trying to make there? Sorry but from that sentence I have to doubt your Cambridge credentials I’m afraid. As anyone who has been through 3 years of rigorous interrogation by Oxbridge tutors on a weekly basis would know, you don’t use one word that doesn’t have a very precise meaning, let alone a whole sentence, you would be torn to shreds! Unless, of course, you want to give me some details of the educational system unique to Oxford and Cambridge which only graduates of those institutions would know to corroborate that? If you can then I will proffer my sincerest apologies for being such a Doubting Thomas!

    Reply
  71. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    Oh and I assume from your opening statement that you are also gay then? And a gay mother too – not so many of them around! That’s interesting because the tone of your comment seemed to imply a sense of outrage at the idea that people might contemplate the notion that someone like Jennifer Aniston was gay, rather than the natural sense of pride that that person is part of the gay community and happiness for her for having that blessing (as most gay people consider it to be). For the most part, gay people love it when a famous person is thought to be gay as we love to be represented in the media. You, on the other hand, seem upset at the possibility of it and seem to be implying that contemplating it is denigrating to her character – something which I think is pretty unlikely that a gay person would think. Peculiar aren’t you?

    Reply
  72. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:18 pm

    @latinalady:

    Also I have no idea what you meant by this statement:

    “As a graduate and mother (Cambridge) I know consideration has to be taken in everything we do and say”?

    First of all are you in fact not a Cambridge graduate at all but a mother LIVING IN Cambridge as the sentence structure would imply? If so can you tell me what exactly the relevance of your location was to your argument as I don’t see it? Also, do you honestly think I am just bandying about the idea that someone is gay with no “consideration” whatsoever? Have you read much of this blog before LatinaLady? It would seem not to me, because believe me, if you had, you would know that one thing I never do is say something without a whole lot of consideration! Lol

    Reply
  73. Pattyanne said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    So true. Having fallen head over heels myself, I can understand her sense of betrayal, devistation and utter horror to find her world so suddenly changed. I watched her awards speech at the Oscars, and saw the camera pan in on a close-up of Jesse with tears in his eyes and thought to myself how lucky those two are, to have found one another and to share such a deep love and respect. I suppose that’s why I feel extremely disgusted with James to read daily of the latest stripper/porn star/ fame seeker coming out to hire Gloria-the-ambulance-chaser-Alred. It has to tear Sandra’s heart apart repeatedly each time. I truly feel empathy for her. There is no understanding why a person does what he/she does, but everything has a cause and an effect. I wish Sandra Bullock well, and hope she learns to trust men again one day, but I know it won’t be for a long time.@Emerson:

    Reply
  74. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:36 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Humanities and Social Sciences, Education in Languages, Jesus College, very beautifull. Unfortunetely I was not good enough to complete my Masters there.. Why would we know the same people? You have totally misinterprated my points. I’m not her to challenge you personally. I asked one question and fully understood your original reply. Just because you think JA has to hire people to act as her boyfriend does not equate her being bi/gay, that’s the point I’m trying to make. I do not state that you based JA’s sexual preferences from any DM articles. But you have really pissed me off by infering to my racial background, why is that interesting? I have read here and followed what I have assumed to be a very intelligent website, not the topics but the contributors. You really seem to have a problem with intelligence, please take a minute to think about your own insecurities. I have had fight all my life so far against the prejudices of my birth place and appearance to a few old fashioned English/British/whites who make ignorant assumptions,. Finally does it really matter where I studied, I made the error of trying to justify myself to a person who’s views I respected by using the same argument they do when they are defending themselves and I abhorred everytime someone came here to specifically attack you. I can however now understand some of their reasons. I won’t however stop coming here now and then to enjoy the daily debate. Thank you and goodnight.

    Reply
  75. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:43 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Why are you making a generalised assumption about gay people, I dislike anyone being labelled and do not need to make insinuations about anyone. I can truly see your prejudices. I’m tempted to include my story of discovery but feel there’s no point and I can only base that on your replies so far.

    Reply
  76. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 7:50 pm

    “Have you read much of this blog before LatinaLady? It would seem not to me, because believe me, if you had, you would know that one thing I never do is say something without a whole lot of consideration! Lol”

    Yes I have which is why I asked the original question. You always write like a true professional and I enjoy it. Everything you write is well though out and you never lie or go back on your words. If you can belittle this site as per previous post and not see the excellent material here I really do despair, I sincerely hope it was said in irony.

    Reply
  77. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    @latinalady:

    Sweetheart – a Masters is not a course that is offered by Oxford or Cambridge – a simple google search would have told you that. Rather, a Masters is conferred by right on all graduates of the colleges automatically on graduation. There is no Masters programme at all at Oxbridge, just undergraduate and post-graduate courses (PHD). Plus “Education in Language” – what course is that meant to be? Did you know that Oxbridge does not offer all the many varieties of subjects and courses that all other UK universities offer? They just do the core academic staples – a very small list. Anyone who has studied there could reel them off because there are just so few of them. Another unique detail to those institutions that you would unquestionably have known had you studied there! And most people who are intelligent enough to get a place there are intelligent enough to finish – if you weren’t clever enough you’d never have got the place in the first place. Very few people leave without completing their course, although on very rare occasions someone may go back a year if tutors feel they are failing. Oxford and Cambridge operate on such a small ratio of students to tutors (there were only 10 of us doing English in my college and that was one of the largest ones, sometimes it can be as few as 1 student per subject per college per year – as my fine artist friend was) that you get so much one-to-one attention hardly anyone ever drops out. My tutor was with me every step of the way through my exams, no dropping out at Oxbridge I can tell you for sure. And of course your college was beautiful – they all are – but that would not be the first thing that a student of one of them would comment on. All colleges have their own unique character in terms of subject strengths, particular tutors, politics, wealth, age, alumni and so on and so on. These are the details a student of a college would give when first describing where they studied – not what it looked like – that would be academic! (No pun intended!). And I asked about your nationality because another thing that a lot of people from outside the UK don’t realise is there are next-to-no Latina people in the UK. We have huge Asian and Afro-carribean communities but barely any people from South America. (That is one big difference between the US and UK). And when I was at Oxford, out of the 10,000 people who were studying there at that time, there were hardly any non-white faces and not one single person of hispanic origin that I can think of. These universities are still dominated by white people and posh white people at that – I myself was in the minority. Also the non-British people at Oxbridge have to pay, which means they usually only come from countries which are known to be quite wealthy. Fees are about £10,000-15,000 a year (just for tuition) – did you know that? (Oh and also seriously don’t pull the race card with me when you are using the username “latinalady”!).

    I have advised fakes/plants on this board over and over again to not pretend you studied at Oxbridge because I will immediately be able to call you out on it, as I just have done. It is so foolish. And to be honest, no-one who had got a place at Cambridge would ever write with such atrocious grammar and spelling as you have just done. It just wouldn’t happen. And no it didn’t matter at all where you did or – as the case is here – did not, study so why did YOU make a point of bringing it up? Oh and please do knock it off with the whole “I abhorred the people who came here specifically to attack you but now understand why” BS, as I really could not give an eff about that, it is so 2009. People can say what they damn well please about me here if they like, I am not going to go home and cry into my soup about it! To bring up all this nonsense all over again just shows exaclty who you are and exactly what your purposes were in commenting here. All I can say is bitch puh-lease, get over it!

    Reply
  78. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 8:21 pm

    @latinalady:

    Did you think you had got me something on there? Oh dear! Ha ha. Nice try but as I’m sure you know I was describing what your opinion must be of this site on the basis of your tabloid logic, not giving my own opinion. Bloody hell, I am this site practically – I write ten times as much on it as Ian does – I obviously am not belittling. Sorry but again, you think someone who could get a place at Cambridge to do a masters course that doesn’t exist would come up with an argument as fallacious as that? Seriously hun, I’m feeling for you here! Am interested to know how you will respond to all those rather key problems with what you wrote in your previous comment though, so I’m pleased you decided to stick around!

    Reply
  79. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    @latinalady:

    I AM GAY YOU UTTER MUPPET – are you trying to suggest I am prejudiced against myself, like I am the site I’ve written on virtually every day for the past year?!! OH MY WORD!

    Reply
  80. bluiznsmilez said on March 27th, 2010 at 8:34 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    As a lurker on this site, I cannot believe the way you ATTACKED latinalady. Your are truly a person that suffers from delusions of grandiose. My god. You are a hateful person who hides behind intelligence to belittle others. Arrogant, smarmy and self righteous.

    I do notice that you attack straight women who get cheated on ala Jen and Sandy. You have deep prejudices that you display often and can’t stand folks that don’t see your conspiracy in every event.

    Reply
  81. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 8:40 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  82. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:10 pm

    What a blinkered life you must live, you don’t know any or many Latinos, therefore there can’t be many in this country. what does that say about your research methods? I am from a thirld world country, therefore I shouldn’t be able to afford a University Education, let alone a Cambridge one. I stated I am a gay mother, you obviously don’t know many to again generalise that is rare. Your experience at Uni was a very straightlaced one, therefore everyone else should have had the same experience. I should have stated that I would not conform sufficiently to want to finish my Masters as much as they tried. Please go back and your research re: the Masters as I’m not in the habit of lying. What does Grammar matter twenty odd years after finishing your Education, I don’t live in the past. Now I will say again with no apologies, your prejudices lie with my race and my gay lifestyle that is different from yours because again if my experiences are not the same as yours, then they can not be true or good enough. You can’t belittle me with prejudices and experiences just because they do not conform to yours.

    Reply
  83. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I know from what I have read you are gay. What has that to do with anything, your prejudice is not in people’s sexuality but rather how you think they should behave/re-act/act

    Reply
  84. latinalady said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:20 pm

    I AM GAY YOU UTTER MUPPET – are you trying to suggest I am prejudiced against myself, like I am the site I’ve written on virtually every day for the past year?!! OH MY WORD!
    All I can say is bitch puh-lease, get over it!

    All that education wasted because at the end of it all you are just vulgar. In a moment of realisation all your posts show that you are the true journalist, deflecting and twisting words to suit. Goodnight all

    Reply
  85. B said on March 28th, 2010 at 12:21 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Where did you read about the stripper saying sandra &jessie had an arrangement?
    His taste in women is so strange..I bet he’s into S&M. One of these girls allegedly tried to strangle her husband,the other punched a cop….he’s got to be into it ,i bet he’s the sub! Those women are not very feminine are they….The whole thing looks a little suss to me Jessie & Sandra…he’s overly macho but likes very tough women…I sense a guy who overcompensates!! Guys find those girls gross!! the ones I know anyway…Thanks for your posts Keane,I find you to be one of the few intelligent commentators on the media. Keep dissecting the bullshit we’re told!!!

    Reply
  86. Mary said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:04 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    And when I was at Oxford, out of the 10,000 people who were studying there at that time, there were hardly any non-white faces and not one single person of hispanic origin that I can think of. These universities are still dominated by white people and posh white people at that – I myself was in the minority.

    How would you know if someone is Hispanic or not? You are basically saying ALL Hispanics are brown or dark. How stereotypical of you. Last time I checked Charlie Sheen is…..does he pass your Hispanic Identifying test? Wow you really are a ball of knowledge.

    Reply
  87. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on March 28th, 2010 at 7:22 am

    I just saw The Blind Side. What a racist piece of shyt!

    Reply
  88. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 7:26 am

    @ bluizinsmilez

    1) She started it!
    2) It is “delusions of grandeur” not “grandiose”.
    3) Latinalady is lying, there is no such thing as a masters course at Cambridge – google it!
    4) Try to develop some reading comprehension skills – I like Jennifer and Sandy and have defended the former against attacks on her endlessly – one of the main reasons I write against Brangelina in fact is because of how she has been treated by them. Get a clue!
    5) You completely misunderstood the conversation I am having with this poster. My advice: stick to lurking!

    Reply
  89. inOttawa said on March 28th, 2010 at 7:51 am

    Radaronline reports that Sandra is presently staying in the house she owned pre-marriage… who keeps a $1.45M home on the side, after marrying someone else? Why would someone do that?

    Reply
  90. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 8:03 am

    @ latinalady – you are hilarious! There is no such thing as a masters course at Cambridge – google it! Neither is there such a course as “Language in Education” as you say. No my experience of Oxford was not a very “straight-laced” one – far from it in fact – what a stupid assumption to make! (By the way straight-laced means you aren’t into sex and drugs and wild parties, it has nothing to do with the racial profile of a group of people – not the right word to use in the context at all!). And my assessment of the racial make-up of those universities is based on actual evidence of the 10,000 people who studied there at the time I was there. In my year at my college there were one or two people who were not white, but these people were still privately educated. A good 90% of the people studying there were white and the vast majority of them were from the middle to upper classes and also privately educated. I myself was looked down upon by a lot of the people there for coming from a state school and not speaking like or having the same background as them. Oxford and Cambridge are still very cliquey and snobby places as anyone who has studied there will know, it is not at all like the egalitarian, racially mixed profile of the major cities in the UK, sorry. Try going to one of these cities sometime, you will see they are overwhelmingly made up of white toffs! So you are saying you are from South America but have British citizenship so you didn’t have to pay the £15,000 or so a year tuition fees or you are from South America so had to – sorry I’m not sure which? Oh and no I am not saying there aren’t many people of latina origin in the UK in comparison to the large populations of Asian and Afro-Carribean people because I do not know any, I am saying it because if you look up the stats on ethnic groups in the UK you will find that it is true! And yes I do know some gay parents but there are still not many of us out there – nowhere near as many as there should be. So thanks so much for trying to accuse me now not only of being racist but prejudiced towards my own kind too (that’s a new one!) – it only goes to show how you really have no other decent argument! Oh and by the way, yes spelling and grammar do matter when it comes to getting a place at oxbridge. You would never have got one with yours, and no people don’t tend to forget how to punctuate or spell as they get older! “I don’t live in the past” therefore I have abandoned all concern for correct grammar and punctuation? Honey, you sure as hell do say some funny things! But hey if you are still intent on making me believe you did a course that doesn’t exist at Cambridge then I’m sure you can tell me all about the particular tutoring practices and traditions which are unique to those two instituions – if you’d studied there you would instantly know what I meant. So no need to debate this any further, we can settle it by simply chatting about that. I’ll look forward to hearing back from you!

    Reply
  91. Pattyanne said on March 28th, 2010 at 10:15 am

    Sorry to read that review, but I thank you for your take on it. I have it on my list of films to rent, which I do before I buy a Blue-Ray DVD as they are so expensive. Loved her in The Proposal though, laughed so hard in several scenes, so I’d give it a thumbs up to see.@Kramer Vs. Kramer:

    Reply
  92. bluiznsmilez said on March 28th, 2010 at 10:35 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    1.) I don’t come on sites for spelling lessons but feel free to show your intelligence further. I care not where I place the comma or if in my haste I use the wrong there, their or they’re. You don’t know me and you don’t know my reading skills. But hey, if that makes you feel better, have at it. I think on the internet your true personality (right bitch) shows , but in person you probably hide it real well. You know, to the commoners.

    2.) Sure you “like” them. Yes, you’ve defended them. But why must they be closeted gays? Why can’t they just be two women who were “blind-sided” (pardon the pun) by the men they “loved?”

    3.) Who gives a shyte if she is lying. Half the damn people are lying on the internet. I always assume I’m talking to a fat balding man in his underwear. That keeps it in perspective. This is not a reputable site, there for, I don’t put much stock into the posts. But it is ENTERTAINMENT.

    Now, back to the topic at hand…… what saddens me now, is that they are gonna punk Sandy (ala Jen) for the next 5 years as the desperate scorned woman flitting from man to man. She will be reduced in magazines to a one dimensional person who just can’t live without a man. Unless of course. We don’t buy the trash they sell, including IAN’s pathetic blame the victim post.

    Now, back to lurking.

    Reply
  93. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 11:35 am

    Hiya bluizinsmilez, boy oh boy you sure seem to have got out of bed on the wrong side today don’t you? Or are you like this on a daily basis? (From your previous posts I think I can answer that question so no need to worry your pretty head about answering!). So let me get this straight: it is fine for someone to attack me on this blog as you and latinalady have been doing, but not ok for me to respond is that correct? Also, it is ok for you to call me a total bitch and for people to tell huge lies about significant details of their lives to make a point but not ok for me to suggest that someone might be gay is that right? I am trying to understand what your logic is here, perhaps you can explain it to me?

    And again, there is a major problem with your reading comprehension skills; I have just written a long post about how I am not posh and have been on the receiving end of snobbery and yet you imply that I am nice to “commoners” – I am a commoner idiot! And I definitely wasn’t giving you a lesson in spelling, I was pointing out that you were using entirely the wrong word (a bit of a problem when you’re trying to act all big and clever on the internet!). Oh and I don’t come on the net to have conversations with idiots like you, so do you think you could manage to never address a comment to me or refer to me in a post ever again as I would really appreciate it? Let’s see if you can manage that.

    And as for my opinions on Sandy and Jennifer, I have absolutely no intention of debating them with the likes of you, so maybe you can engage the conversation of someone else commenting here instead? Or as you yourself suggested, do us all a favour and go back to lurking? Thank you kindly.

    Reply
  94. Emerson said on March 28th, 2010 at 11:55 am

    OK PEOPLE, can’t we all just get along??? Who gives a rats ass whether you are black, white, hispanic, gay, straight, bi, etc.??? I know I don’t! I am a straight woman, BUT if I were attracted to another woman, who knows? I do not label, do not judge, do not fight…we are all getting away from the point at hand…the Sandra/Jesse drama. I for one, do not at all believe Sandra is gay nor do I put that label on Jen. It is their lives, their way of life, and why should every single woman be considered gay?? I am 43, have never been married, so does that make me gay? That nonesense needs to stop! I also have been to most Caribbean Islands, so Latinalady perhaps I have met you before? Ya know what, if we had met, that would be the farthest thing from my mind! I LOVE the Caribbean and the people are lovely! I go at least 2 x a year…everyone on here is entitled to their own opinion, 1st ammendment and all, but there is NO need to attack grammer et al. Keane, you are GREAT! That is why I keep coming here, but you are a little shall I say over the line with LatinaLady? I am not saying anything about you, I like you very much, but some of your comments were way out of line. I love my new friends here too and PattyAnn is awesome, BUT she called me on a snarky comment I first made…I apologized and told her she was right. Lauren does not agree with some of my posts, but I see her side and there ARE things we agree upon. Now, let’s stop this disfunctional family that I see coming and just all love each other (and yes I say that in jest) I LOVE YOU ALL!!!!!

    Reply
  95. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    @Emerson:

    Emerson with all due respect a lot of us have been commenting here for way over a year now and there has been a lot of sh*t that goes on. People who work on behalf of people like Brangelina come on this site to pretend to be genuine posters and attack things I have said which are a little too close to the truth for their liking. One of the key things they do over and over again is pretend they either went to Oxford or Cambridge as they feel that that is a credential of mine which gives what I say some authority and is therefore more threatening to them. What they don’t understand is that if you didn’t study at Oxbridge you can’t fake it, there are just too many differences and peculiar quirks and traditions which make the institutions completely different to all other universities. I also studied at a “normal” university for a year so know the differences inside out. One pretty key detail is that there is no such thing as an MA that can be studied at Oxbridge, that is not a course that has ever been offered there. You can either do a degree or a PHD, no such thing as a Masters. Read this info on the Cambridge website:

    http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/univ/degrees/ma/

    It is why I know latinalady is lying and she is just a plant to cause trouble and deflect from what is being said. The fakes always go for the jugular as well in terms of trying to imply I am racist or something becuase I comment on the fact that someone is from a particular ethnic origin (as her username proudly declared) – it always follows a standard pattern and is quite ridiculous. Then you get the ones who pretend they work in the media in London because I do and try to claim a superior insight to me because of that. I have had the most ridiculous arguments with such posters on the site over the past year and a bit who will literally argue day is night and night is day to try to make some impact (one tried to argue that London wasn’t the crime capital of the UK which even the most clueless of Brits would know is definitely the case!). It is all a bit tedious and I’m glad it has died down lately but I think that that’s because there has been a lot less posted on this site since then and there is a lot less traffic.

    Basically without going into detail I will say there has been and is quite a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes which I can’t go into here. What has been written on this blog is not just a bit of light-hearted entertainment as it first might seem. Things are being said on this site that aren’t being said anywhere else and it is seriously pissing off certain people who seem to think they rule the world and are prepared to use any tactic – including serious crime – to prevent that happening. As much as I would like it to be this is not a place where we can all just be one big happy family and have fun I’m afraid it can’t be as there are some very serious issues at stake which is what motivates me to write here. Please forgive me if you think I am talking to people in a way that is out of line on occasion, they are not in general real people and I have strong reasons for doing so. Hope you continue to enjoy reading the site and commenting despite this.

    All the best

    Kx

    Reply
  96. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    Ok I just wrote a long post to you then Em but it didn’t appear which is strange. Let’s see if it will come up but if it doesn’t I’ll have to try to get back in touch with you again.

    Reply
  97. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    @Emerson:

    Hey hun, my long post hasn’t appeared so will have to do a quick re-cap. The discussion on this site has been going on for over a year now and there has been a lot of craziness going on here from day one. Put it this way, what is written on this site is not just a bit of trivial gossip, it is stuff that can wreck people’s careers and cost certain people and companies millions of dollars. There is a whole lot of money invested in keeping these people and a lot of other people’s businesses depend on their success. There have been people coming on to this site to argue against what is said by Ian, myself and Kate for the whole time we have been posting here (over a year). They are people who work on behalf of people like Brangelina and are paid to do it. They pretend to be just any old random person from around the world but then when challenged will start trotting out details that they think will trump what I or others have said. They are threatened by a couple of things about me (my education and career mainly) as it gives more authority to what I say than if I was just a random housewife or office worker for example. There have been numerous posters who have come on here and tried to pretend they are a graduate of Oxford and Cambridge, but if you didn’t study there you can be called out on it straight away by someone who has as they are institutions governed by old and peculiar traditions unique to themselves which most people do not know about. Latinalady is a fake poster, she is writing things that are obvious lies. There is no such thing as an MA that can be studied for at Oxford or Cambridge, rather it is conferred on all it’s grads by right. You can do a PhD there or a degree, not an MA. And there is no such course as “language in education” either, Oxbidge sticks to a limited number of very traditional academic subjects, the titles of which are also often unique to these institutions – you kind of need to have gone there to know them. If you google “masters Cambridge University” and look at about the sixth link down it will take you to their website which explains this. I think my previous post didn’t post because it included that link. So what I’m trying to say is, there is a bit more going on on this site than at first meets the eye and there are people posting here who aren’t what they seem to be. There is also some quite serious sh*t going on behind the scenes which really does beggar belief. Can’t go into it much here but just wanted to alert you to the fact that this isn’t really all fun and games unfortunately. I hope you will still continue to enjoy and comment on the site though.
    All the best

    Kx

    Reply
  98. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Meant to say by the way there is a reason why Angelina keeps going out on that balcony day after day after day. This is media wars.

    Reply
  99. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    By the way, this is hilarious:

    http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/angelina-jolie-in-talks-to-play-wicked-godmother-in-sleeping-beauty-2010283

    Which one of Brange uses US Weekly as their mouthpiece again – is it Brad? It would seem like it from this wouldn’t it? Is this in retaliation for the balcony scenes do we think? Lol

    Reply
  100. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    Angelina doing some promotional work for Cipriani while promoting herself as the “noble single mother” alert:

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/03/27/angelina-jolie-private-playground/

    Ker-ching!

    I take it her people have taken up the idea that she is beginning to look ridiculous standing on that balcony then? Predictable!

    Reply
  101. Skycap said on March 28th, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    Keane, the cyber queen

    There are masters programs at Oxford. This is a direct cut and paste from one of the web pages:

    http://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/international_students/index.html#apostgraduate_education
    Postgraduate education

    Oxford is an exciting place to pursue postgraduate/graduate education. We offer two types of programmes:

    * Master’s: these are 1 or 2 year degrees. Many people take these degrees as a professional qualification, and then leave to work. For others, usually in the humanities and social sciences, these are the essential first step on the road to a doctorate and an academic or research-based career.
    * Doctorate: our doctorate is known as a D.Phil rather than a Ph.D. It is a research-intensive degree, lasting 3-4 years.

    They also have a well known lingusitics department which if the person you are replying to has english as a second language, there may be a language barrier.

    Oxford also offers an MSc in Education which certain courses have a strong focus on language acquisition.

    And if you are looking at the U of Cambridge; it also has a masters level. Here, cut and pasted from their website is a list:
    http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/univ/gsprospectus/study/taught/index.html
    Explanation of course types:

    * Master of Philosophy (MPhil)
    * Master of Research (MRes)
    * Master of Law (LLM)
    * Master of Finance (MFin)
    * Master of Business Administration (MBA)
    * Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
    * Master of Studies (MSt)
    * Master of Education (MEd)
    * Diplomas and Integrated Masters

    The master of education has a linguistics component for some disciplines.

    And what are my credentials? I am an educational consultant who has spent significant time in the UK and other countries putting together research for various universities, firms, and occasionally the government(s) of needs based analysis for programs and geographical expansion. Did this for over 20 years.

    Reply
  102. alif said on March 28th, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    @Emerson:
    Yes, I do agree with you; although I am sometimes the guilty party. Mea culpa!
    My interest lies with those who deliberately lie to the public; and then prosetylize regarding their hidden agendas.

    To some extent they have to fool the public. The public at large would rather not know. They prefer their illusions! That’s why there is such outrage when their favorite idols turn out to be, or have been false idols.

    It all depends, however. These two, Sandra and Jen, don’t deserve to have the Sexual Orientation Police (SOP) snooping about their private lives.
    It’s too “1984″ for my taste!

    Reply
  103. alif said on March 28th, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    @alif:
    To be more specific, I’d point to what Ted C. is doing to his “Toothy Tile”. Why does he do this?
    It”s cyberbullying at its worst!
    What did the subject of his cyberbullying do to him?
    And of course, once he did it, the Laineys, Perez=Hiltons, and other foul doers joined in!
    And the target can’t fight back without public exposure!
    They have careers to protect!

    I am curious about thespians up to a certain level. I wouldn’t throw stones, however!
    Makes sense?

    Reply
  104. Pattyanne said on March 28th, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    I discovered what has Perez so against Jennifer Aniston – he was the one who tried to print those topless photos of Jennifer awhile back taken with a micro lense on a camera. She sued, he got his hands slapped and he’s been on a rant against her since.
    http://www.theinsider.com/news/58730_Perez_Hilton_Sued_Over_Topless_Jennifer_Aniston_Pics@alif:

    Reply
  105. Pattyanne said on March 28th, 2010 at 6:09 pm

    To clarify:
    “The Aniston image was allegedly “misappropriated and illegally copied” during production or post-production of the 2006 romantic comedy hit The Break-Up, starring the actress and Vince Vaughn, the suit said.”

    “The lawsuit, claiming copyright infringement, said Lavandeira “posted all or or parts of the stolen footage from the motion picture on his website.”

    Seems the photo taken of a nearly nude Aniston was the one taken by a papparazi in 2005 from outside her home through a window. It’s covered on this link also.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  106. Emerson said on March 28th, 2010 at 6:33 pm

    While I understan where you come from Keane, you sometimes are over the top, and with this link WAY over the top….not every single or married HW couple are gay or bi…I just won’ believe it. I too see the interlopers and they are quite easy to point to…especially the Brand, it is quite obvious when I read each one, however, that being said, you may be off the mark on some of them just as I will admit to being off the mark as well. I also understand the fakers….and remember I always always backed you up with Mia/Lory whoever. But what I read in an interview recently was Sandra stating that the one thing that made her fall in love with Jesse was when she discovered him exercising along to a Spice Girls song…now that to me rings true, who would say that??? Jesse is a pig, but I am so sorry for what they are going through and wanted to get that point across. Now as to the millions of dollars being affected by all the HW not sure I believe that one. I do, however, believe that all the pr for films ie. Jen and Gerard, obviouslly is for publicity, nothing more nothing less….that’s been going on since the 20’s!!! And 40′S….helloooo Rock Hudson anyone? My entire point today was just to calm things down slightly, I guess I am a peacemaker as I thought it was getting very heated. Keane, you are the reason I began reading this blog, and yes, I will continue to do so…and if my grammar is off, I am on my cell and it’s a little harder, lol. BTW, I am 43 and single, so does that make me gay? I never say never, but so far I’ve only liked men :} and Keane I still love you!!! However, I will never believe in a million years that Sandra or Jen are gay, jmo……have a great night all! Thanks Keane for being a cyber friend!

    Reply
  107. Lauren said on March 28th, 2010 at 8:12 pm

    Well hell, since we’re all throwing in our .02:

    I don’t think there’s any need for anyone other than LatinaLady and Keane to get their panties in a bunch. An argument between two adult women should be just that, between two adult women. No need to chastise anyone either way; if it’s making you uncomfortable than ask them to stop or to carry on somewhere else.

    Reply
  108. Lauren said on March 28th, 2010 at 8:14 pm

    But seriously, where the hell is Brad?

    Reply
  109. alif said on March 29th, 2010 at 12:09 am

    @Pattyanne:
    I stopped checking Perez-Hilton’s site when he,
    1) Made a fool of himself by declaring Fidel Castro had died. He was one hundred per cent sure of it. This was close to two yrs. ago!
    Read recently that he had Jaclyn Smith as having died when it was, in fact, another “Charlie’s Angel”, Farrah Fawcett who passed.

    2) Those stupid doodles of a perverse nature. Defacing celebs. And kids with free access to the web taking in all this. This contributes to the downspiraling of our society, imo!
    Then he lands guest spots on tv and acts as if he was deserving of the exposure; that he is entitled!
    He is, indeed, an evildoer! Imo!

    Reply
  110. Kate said on March 29th, 2010 at 12:22 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Yes have to agree Keane , that was glaring to me too, glaring, brightly..lol,,sitting here reading and thinking, ah hell no, not again. Thought we were done with this shyt.

    Reply
  111. Kate said on March 29th, 2010 at 12:31 am

    @alif:
    same here

    Reply
  112. Kate said on March 29th, 2010 at 12:45 am

    @Pattyanne:
    That has been going on for years and years, he use to rant about that on his site until he was given the word to shush about it. He called her all kinds of names when that went down.

    Reply
  113. Tinkuy said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:16 am

    Hey, Keane, if you’re so educated (as you claim), please explain why you don’t know the difference between “its” and “it’s”, e.g., “There is no such thing as an MA that can be studied for at Oxford or Cambridge, rather it is conferred on all it’s grads by right.”

    Reply
  114. alif said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:57 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I have some idea that European countries are having immigration problems. France has been reported on about this.
    Now, today The Sun is reporting that over 80% of its readers who replied to polls are fed up with too much immigration. It has nothing to do with racism; rather it’s the qualitiy of life that is being taken away from the citizens due to too many immigrants.
    I believe I saw somewhere that Germany is having some of that as well.
    The United States of America now has the third largest population in the world. I hope I remembered this correctly. And we have the same struggles with the pros and cons of immigration.
    I have my own view; and it’s made me very unpopular among some acquaintances/friends. It’s con!

    Reply
  115. dearlord said on March 29th, 2010 at 7:55 am

    I see the expert on all things English has reared it’s ugly head once more – effectively driving off another intelligent commentor because heaven forbid anyone challenge how racist England truly can be in the upper education ranks. I would think this blog would welcome as many posters as it could – but alas Keane is flexing her muscles once again and insulting newcomers. Bravo Ian you must be so proud !!

    Reply
  116. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 8:05 am

    @Pattyanne:
    OMG OMG Patty!!! I have wondered about that from the get go!!! He is down right NASTY about her!!! That makes SOOOO much sense! I, too, stopped reading him as he is obviouslly promoting Sainta Angelina, yuck Perez lol

    Reply
  117. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 8:06 am

    @Pattyanne:
    right on, and Bombshell LMAO is selling what on the internet for $10?? YEA, no ulterior motives there!

    Reply
  118. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 8:08 am

    @Lauren:
    sorry, but I was just trying to lighten the load, using some humor and some serioussness (is that a word?) I didn’t mean anything other than that…

    Reply
  119. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 8:09 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    BIG time war, perhaps they are using the Sandra/Jesse blow up to deflect from what is going on in their own lives??

    Reply
  120. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 8:11 am

    @alif:
    LOL now you are hitting my time with the 1984…I’m starting to feel old all of a sudden…

    Reply
  121. dearlord said on March 29th, 2010 at 9:15 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    she didn’t say there was a course called Language in Education – she said “Humanities and Social Sciences, Education in Languages” which to a normal person would indicate she partook in a variety of courses in those fields. But go ahead and try to ridicule someone for whom English obviously isnt’ her first tongue if it makes you feel more superior. Frankly i think it just makes you look petty and mean.

    Reply
  122. dearlord said on March 29th, 2010 at 9:19 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    hmm listed under International Students on the oxford website its says “Postgraduate education
    Oxford is an exciting place to pursue postgraduate/graduate education. We offer two types of programmes:

    Master’s: these are 1 or 2 year degrees. Many people take these degrees as a professional qualification, and then leave to work. For others, usually in the humanities and social sciences, these are the essential first step on the road to a doctorate and an academic or research-based career.
    Doctorate: our doctorate is known as a D.Phil rather than a Ph.D. It is a research-intensive degree, lasting 3-4 years. ”

    So technically – yah they have a Masters degree

    Reply
  123. dearlord said on March 29th, 2010 at 9:27 am

    @dearlord:
    http://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/international_students/index.html

    Undergraduate courses in 1-3 subjects (which i believe she said included education in languages (ie she studied languages), Hunanities and Social sciences. At which time after the Undergraduate, she did not “qualify” for the Post graduate (or Masters). Its all on the website and if you aren’t in the middle of a foaming at the mouth , i’m the only smart person here tantrum, it would be obvious what the lady was trying to say.

    Reply
  124. Lizzy said on March 29th, 2010 at 10:25 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I have to completely disagree with you – just this once – why at 40 would she enter into a marriage just for a beard? it’s ridiculous, she is under the radar and never would have had to do anything like that. I think she really thought this was the true thing. If you trust your partner completely they can easily get away with things if they wanted to.

    Reply
  125. Lauren said on March 29th, 2010 at 10:33 am

    @Emerson:
    Oh, that wasn’t directed at you Emerson. I’m talking about all of these random ppl. that hadn’t been in on the discussion and all of a sudden have something to say.

    Reply
  126. dearlord said on March 29th, 2010 at 10:45 am

    @Lauren:
    maybe people don’t like to see someone getting bullied and called a liar based on one person’s opinion

    Reply
  127. Chris said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    Let’s not devote half the site to fighting between posters. It’s a waste of time and who cares where one went to school? Not me, for one and I don’t care about one’s sexuality – it’s none of my business. For all the grammar corrections, its is the correct possessive pronoun, not it’s, as in “There is no such thing as an MA that can be studied for at Oxford or Cambridge, rather it is conferred on all it’s grads by right.” Perhaps before too much site time is spent correcting everyone else, get it right yourself. Move on and let’s post about Ian’s lead.
    Thank you.
    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  128. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    @Chris:

    Kiss my derriere chris!

    Reply
  129. Tinkuy said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Chris is correct. And Keane should get her derriere off her high horse tout de suite.

    Reply
  130. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    @Lauren:

    Thanks Lauren, some of them are paid to do it (latinalady etc), others are just pains in the ass (bluizinsmilez etc) – it happens all the time.

    Can I just ask though why everyone is getting their panties in such a bunch over this? Ian obviously thinks Sandra is gay, so do I and most of you posting here don’t, that’s about the sum total of this conversation. My comment about Sandra really was just a passing comment/opinion, I honestly don’t care about her personal life at all, don’t think she’s a bad person in any way and in no way mean anything malicious by it. It really was just a quick statement of my opinion of it and moving on. She doesn’t really interest me. I honestly don’t really understand why people are so upset about the idea that she might be gay and was using Jesse as a beard as so many of them do, rather than them actually having a fake relationship for publicity/ to keep their private life private as SO many HW couples do. You have to understand, most celebs do not want to tell millions of people around the world all about their private lives – like the rest of us they like to keep the details of who they sleep with and who they love to themselves. A way of doing that – whatever the reason behind it is – is to fabricate a personal life they can use to discuss in interviews when they have to answer inevitable personal questions to promote their films/records. You just can’t market things these days without talking about these things – these industries are not governed by talent any more, they are governed by the element of interest in an individual’s personal life. Look at the difference between Britney and Christina Aguilera. Aguilera is 10x more talented than Britney will ever be, but Britney has always been the bigger star – you have to ask why that is. Same with Angelina, she is not talented, never has been, never will be. But people are intrigued about her personal life and they probably always will be. That is how things are sold nowadays (well they always have been to an extent) and how it all works. There are many, many decent actors and musicians out there who never make it because they just don’t have that thing that makes you pay attention to them. Which is why so many talented people now have to play the same game the likes of Angelina and Lady Gaga does. Lady Gaga has changed the music industry since she arrived on the scene. She steals so much attention from other (more talented) artists by her crazy antics that the others have all had to become crazier to try to get some attention for themselves (see Lily Allen and her recent style change lately). All showbusiness is just that, business, and it is all about each individual artist (and the literally dozens of people around them working to promote them) fighting for attention in a very crowded market place from people like YOU, their market. The things these people say about their personal lives in marketing activities (i.e. the interviews they do in the press and on TV) are just that – sales pitches. They are selling themselves to you their audience in order for you to buy their product (their films, their records etc etc). The persona they present in interviews often has absolutely no bearing on their actual personality or real life – it can be an entirely fabricated persona. And every, but every person who is even remotely in the public eye -(down to even the lowest level presenter or “rent an opinion”) will be talked about by their marketing people, agent and manager in terms of being a brand. The name “Sandra Bullock” is a brand, the name “Jennifer Aniston” is a brand – meaning that there are certain personality and character traits that we as the consumer of their brands associate with them. For both these women the traits are things like “wholesome”, “down-to-earth”, “the girl next door”. They are not things like “lesbian”, “social drug user” or “party addict” etc. So if these ladies want to do these things they have to keep it hush hush, because it is bad for their business, which is of course, themselves.

    So what I’m trying to say is if anyone thinks they know who a celeb is in their real life outside showbiz through what they say in their interviews they can think again. Magazines and newspapers are for the most part vehicles that are used to sell products (films, music, tv shows, people, clothes, people etc) to anyone who might buy them i.e. you and I. Celebs do not do interviews for fun, they are always expressly either for marketing a particular product or “keeping their brand out there”, or very occasionally to draw attention to a cause. No other reason. These people keep the reality of what goes on in their lives very private, or at least out of the public realm. Doesn’t mean to say they keep it that quiet when you work with them though. Then you understand how big the difference is between the image they sell in the media and what’s really going on behind closed doors, they are totally different things. Anyhoo, that’s my two cents on Sandy, but other than that I don’t really give a hoot, except to say if she’s gay then good on her!

    Reply
  131. alif said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    Does the poster headlining in red know that readers like myself just scroll past his/her posts?

    Sandra Bullock is the current “America’s Sweetheart”. She is receiving tremedous support from her fans. She is a survivor.
    Although I’m not a fan, I’ve seen her work in person. It was a good experience!

    Reply
  132. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:59 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    Are you going to pretend to be french for us again? That would be worth another go round wouldn’t it? Oh and love how it took you about two minutes to respond to my first post in 24 hours! Been waiting for me honey? Lol

    Reply
  133. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    @dearlord:

    Or just go with the bully line again. Have you not come up with one other decent tactic in the past well over a year now?

    Look folks, here’s the deal: this is what I say and this is how I say it. If you don’t like it you can either ignore my posts or maybe have a think about whether another site might be more suitable for you. In the nicest possible way I am not here to make pals, but if that happens then it’s obviously a bonus. I’m really just here to write some things down that I think and fight against all the crap that people put out there to make $$$$ off the unsuspecting public. Nowt more, nowt less. If you don’t agree with me that is cool with me but if you’re going to start something with me I will respond and that will not change. The only person who can stop me doing that is Ian, if that is what he would prefer. So anyway, take it easy ladies and have fun chatting!

    Reply
  134. alif said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    @Emerson:
    Do the opposite of what those gremlins suggest. Be determined to feel young at all times.
    “1984″ is required reading, even today, in many schools.

    IMO, the world is spinning at a rate that is mind-boggling! In my research that is supposed to happen when there is to be a tremendous change! And there are so many theories about what that could be!
    Does anyone have the same impression?
    Anyway, “1984″ is read widely to keep us aware of our times, ourselves and our world.
    It would take a book to list all the prophets and their prophecies. For myself, things get curiouser and curioser! lol

    Reply
  135. chris said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    @Chris:
    don’t use my name anymore, thank you

    Reply
  136. Lauren said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    @dearlord:
    She wasn’t called a liar based on her opinion. Still, it’s none of your business. That’s my point. Want to attack me, too?

    Reply
  137. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    @dearlord:

    Nope she said she left because she “would not conform” as much as her “tutors tried to persuade her too” – so it was clear that she thought she could study for a masters at Cambridge. You can’t. You can study for a doctorate, but that is an entirely different thing to an MA which everyone knows. Plus there are about a hundred other details specific to these universities that only really people who studied there would know. They are so bizarre and so unique you couldn’t even begin to make them up so it is a bad idea to try to pretend that you studied there when you didn’t. Plus each of the 30 or so colleges within Oxford and Cambridge have their own unique character and reputation which only people who spent three years living and working there would know. You won’t find this info on the internet folks so it is pointless trying to make it up. I do find it hilarious though that we have a raft of new posters trying to convince everyone of the opposite. I have told you over and over again, if you’re going to fake it at least pick a university that is not in the UK which I might not be so familiar with – otherwise change the flipping record!

    Reply
  138. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:13 pm

    @chris:

    Um, would you mind not using mine first please?! As I said before, if you’re going to start with me you better learn how to take it. Otherwise, shut up!

    Reply
  139. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    @dearlord:

    In a variety of courses in those fields? Again do you think that’s what happens in Oxford in Cambridge? Uh, nope again! You cannot take a “variety” of courses or modules at Oxbridge, you take one straight subject, and it is confined to a very, very limited range of subjects so bang that goes that theory! Seriously are you really this stupid that you think you can try to make this stick? Here’s an idea: go to Oxford or Cambridge, study there for a couple of years and then come back and try again. Until then, be my guest and keep making yourself look like an idiot.

    Reply
  140. chris said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    what are you talking about ? i just said that the person who posted to you earlier wasn’t me, i asked him or her to stop using my pseudo, i know i don’t come here often but i’ve always been correct with everyone so i expect the same courtesy.

    Reply
  141. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    @dearlord:

    You always do that leaving a space before the punctuation mark thing – you are so obvious! Lol

    Reply
  142. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    @chris:

    Oh ok sorry! Are you chris in france? I don’t remember any other chris I’m sorry.

    Reply
  143. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    Love how the brand new posters “Tinkuy” and “dearlord” are whipping themselves into a frenzy of posting the moment I return to the site! Dear lord indeed – what are you up to Team Brangelina?!

    Reply
  144. chris said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    YES, that’s me. i just gave up the “from france”, i was the only one chris here and it began to sound too much to my taste. but if someone else starts using it too bully everyone i should put it back !

    Reply
  145. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    @chris:

    Maybe that would be a good idea! Sorry hun, I thought you were another troll! How are you, how is married life?x

    Reply
  146. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    @alif:
    hmmm, I think it would be quite interesting to re read 1984 again now perhaps? I always love to re read such classics at different times in my own life to see how I interpret them….thanks for the good idea!

    Reply
  147. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I’m telling you, Brangelina is basking in the glow of the Sandra/Jesse mess, as it takes all the attention off of them…that is quite obvious…

    Reply
  148. Chris from France said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    wow, you remember that i’m impressed, well married life is great actually, just like the life as a new mom, my son is 4 months old now and he’s a real angel, he smiles all the times and has a lot of energy, and my other kids are very happy of their little brother. and you ? how are you ?

    Reply
  149. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    @Emerson:

    Emerson I’ve written on here before about how there are major parallels between the propaganda of the Big Brother state in 1984 and Brangelina’s stranglehold on the media. Read it again, the parallels are striking.

    Reply
  150. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    @Emerson:

    Hm, not so sure – the danger with the whole Tiger Woods debacle and especially the Jesse and Sandra thing is that it mirrors the Brad and Jen situation which Brangelina think they have so conveniently erased from the public’s consciousness. Bet they’re not so happy about it as you might think. If all Tiger and Jesse’s women are skanks then why isn’t Angelina – see the problem there? This will throw up some tricky questions for Brangelina again, wait and see. More reason to keep putting off the split announcment.

    Reply
  151. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    hmmmm yep that IS interesting….I am glad I do not have to work as the pr guy/gal for any of these “celebrities” as it would have pushed me over the edge quite long ago….and yep, I will re read 1984 and here’s a JA link that was quite interesting to me, maybe someone else will be interested as well…it reflects a lot of what we all have been writing. Hope the link works..

    http://movie-critics.ew.com/2010/03/29/jennifer-aniston-in-the-bounty-hunter-could-become-sandra-bullock-at-the-oscars/?xid=rss-feed-todayslatest-Jennifer+Aniston%3A+Oscar+path%3F&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+entertainmentweekly%2Flatest+%28Entertainment+Weekly%3A++Today%27s+Latest%29

    Reply
  152. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    @Chris from France:

    I remember the nice ones – and try to block out the freaks! Aw wow that is amazing – I did not know you had a baby too – congratulaions! No wonder we haven’t seen you round these parts much! I’m good thanks, my life is a kind of rollercoaster whirlwind but for every problem I have there is a joy to match it too! I do love life!x

    Reply
  153. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @Emerson:

    I was only thinking a similar thought but more along the lines of not wanting to be Angelina to be honest. She has been faking this and trying to keep Brad on board for a good few years now – the stress has to be killing her. Even in an interview with her written just after she got together with Brad (well publically) the journo remarked on how “stressed” she seemed. I just don’t see why living a life feeling like that all the time would be worth it – the point of being successful and making money is to make your life easier and happier, not the other way around! The only way I can explain is that I think she desperately needs the attention and public adoration because she is cold, dead, empty inside. Katie Price in the UK is much the same, a total f*ck up (although she tries to pretend otherwise). Her and Angelina are two peas in a pod.

    Reply
  154. Pattyanne said on March 29th, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    Thanks Em, it is so refreshing to read a review of Jennifer Aniston’s career that isn’t bashing her for her famous Friends role, or comparing her to he ex-hubby’s baby mama. :-) @Emerson:

    Reply
  155. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    That’s why I liked it! Plus it showed a little compassiontly how she has to “play the game” in order to be a star, which is sad….well to me anyhow!

    Reply
  156. Emerson said on March 29th, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I def think Angie is dead inside, there is nothing there…she is like “oh let’s get married” (to Billy Bob for obvious reasons), then that didn’t fill her up, so it’s “oh let’s get a baby” and then, of course that didn’t work, so it’s like “oh, let’s take the World sexiest man (not by my standards of course) from America’s Sweethearts” and that didn’t work, etc. etc. etc. I do not think Angelina will ever feel or have a sense of what word? inner peace? fullness? completeness? That is just sad to me, especially for the children involved, who will def feel the affects/effects of her instability….

    Reply
  157. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 29th, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    @Emerson:

    It’s exactly the same with Katie Price – she got married again less than 6 months after she divorced and is desperately trying to get pregnant again even though she already has three young children. All she think about is promoting herself and her career by any means possible. They are two very sad and desperate ladies.

    Reply
  158. Tinkuy said on March 29th, 2010 at 7:49 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    You didn’t answer my original question about why, despite all your education, you are unable to distinguish between “its” and “it”s”. Yet you feel free to criticize the orthography, grammar, and usage of others.

    Reply
  159. FunnY said on March 29th, 2010 at 11:49 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Goodness me, for someone who goes on about their educational abilities you sure didn’t learn about formatting with paragraphs to make your nasty rants easier to read!

    Also, what is with the ‘1) She started it!’. It’s like being at school – you really do make everything ‘eduation’ related – well done!

    Reply
  160. Isee.. said on March 29th, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    @Keane

    ‘…Oh and by the way, yes spelling and grammar do matter when it comes to getting a place at oxbridge…’. Shouldn’t it be Oxbridge rather than oxbridge? You must have missed your spelling and grammar class!

    Reply
  161. FunnY said on March 29th, 2010 at 11:57 pm

    Ian – Why was my post deleted?

    Reply
  162. Chris said on March 29th, 2010 at 11:58 pm

    I guess there’s only one Chris in the world and you have it copyrighted?! Please. Both you and KCQS must have serious time on your hands. No one needs the lecture about Oxford or Cambridge and Chris, sorry but the world is bigger than you alone which may be shocking to you. Stick to the Ian’s topic not your personal life – you’re both boring…or should I say totals alésages. Yawn.

    Reply
  163. Underwater said on March 30th, 2010 at 12:01 am

    @ Keane

    ‘… Oh and by the way, yes spelling and grammar do matter when it comes to getting a place at oxbridge.’
    If you want to be pedantic shouldn’t it be Oxbridge rather than oxbridge?

    Reply
  164. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 6:29 am

    @ Tinkuy – I probably didn’t answer your question because 1) you’re not a real person and 2) it didn’t make sense. Did you mean “word usage” at the end of that sentence because “usage” on its own doesn’t mean anything at all? And nope I wasn’t criticising your other username latinalady for not being able to spell or use grammar, I was saying there was no way she’d have got a place at Cambridge with English like that. Do any of you actually understand that these are some of the toughest most academically rigorous unis in the world? People who write garbled nonsense on the internet are not likely candidates! Seriously give it up with this “I went to Oxbridge too, ooh Keane is a big meany who criticises other people’s grammar etc” rubbish, its bloody tiresome! Do you know how pathetic you sound desperately clinging on to your “ooh you don’t know the difference between it’s and its” argument? If that’s the best you can do Angelina, James and Geyer really should be worried. Asta la vista loser!

    Reply
  165. Emerson said on March 30th, 2010 at 7:54 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    ugg cannot stand Katie Price, and her orange glow, cage fight/tranny new husband? As she posts pics of her small child with makeup all over her face and with hair straightened? YUCK. Boring. These type of people are really not relavant to me, but, I of course, am intriqued by how the World, (me included) follows them or are interested in their lives. I feel guilty on one hand, then it’s like a train wreck that I cannot take my eyes from, lol….that is why I find this blog interesting, and like to hear what people are saying, just hate the negativity….but that’s just me, I’ve always tried to play “peacemaker” ;)

    Reply
  166. Tinkuy said on March 30th, 2010 at 10:42 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Your response is so utterly predictable and so, so tiresome. Just because I disagree with you and find you to be a cyberbullying cyberjackass doesn’t mean that I’m an impostor (or “not a real person” in your parlance) or multiple screen names rolled into one.
    You, Keane, should not be giving grammar lessons. Case in point: “Her and Angelina are two peas in a pod.”
    Hasta luego, tarada.

    Reply
  167. give it up said on March 30th, 2010 at 11:43 am

    @FunnY:
    Give it up! You’re trying to reason with someone who actually thinks Angelina Jolie hacked into her email account. Rationality isn’t Keane’s strong suit.

    Reply
  168. dearlord said on March 30th, 2010 at 12:02 pm

    @Lauren:
    i don’t believe i’ve attacked anyone. Just making an observation, but i guess having an opinion on this site that differs from the regulars is frowned upon.

    Reply
  169. giveitup said on March 30th, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    @FunnY:
    Give it up FunnY you’re trying to have a discussion with someone who thinks Angelina jolie hacked her email account. Rationality isn’t her strong suit.

    Reply
  170. Pattyanne said on March 30th, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    And to return to the topic of this thread:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    http://dlisted.com/node/36669

    “A source tells Radar that as mistresses continue to fall from the sky, Sandra is making plans to officially leave Vanilla Gorilla, because she’s already been in one bus crash and she’s not going to do it again. The source added that Sandra is meeting with a divorce lawyer, “She’s had enough. She’s ending the marriage.”

    Reply
  171. Pattyanne said on March 30th, 2010 at 1:05 pm

    And now TMZ is reporting that sources claim Jesse is “heading to Arizona to save his marriage”. Too little, too late I’m thinking. How could a wife forget four mistresses? In five years of marriage? Geesh!

    Reply
  172. Pattyanne said on March 30th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/03/exclusive-its-over-sandra-bullock-decides-divorce

    “Radar Online Exclusive says it’s true, Sandra is divorcing Jesse”

    Reply
  173. Emerson said on March 30th, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    :( that makes me sad….she was so over the top with him and when I see her interviewed years ago saying how terrified she was to get married, I think, ahhh now what is she going to think? SOOOO sad! I keep thinking about those 3 children, who have been in her life for 6 years now, what a dick Jesse James is, total pig….imo

    Reply
  174. Pattyanne said on March 30th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    Just goes to show that what one does not only affects themselves, but their circle of friends and family as well. Too bad Jesse didn’t think about them before he turned his “Vanilla gorilla” loose. I see one of Tiger’s strippers/porn stars/ho’s is stalking him; Gloria Alred is her attorney, yet this bimbo says she is going to the Master’s so she can see Tiger….geesh! Do I hear Restraining Order??@Emerson:

    Reply
  175. Emerson said on March 30th, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I’m am sometimes ashamed to be a woman (exaggeration) but man, when these whores, and they are whores, sell themselves out with NO shame whatsoever, to the highest bidder, for their 15 minutes of fame, damn the consequences, I just want to puke. Both male sluts, Jesse and Tiger, have small children who are going to be damaged in some way by their actions, and you can be sure they will be damaged. I am probably damaged by far less that has happened in my life. Then, every single news source has pics with the stories in all their sordid detail (and yes, I realize I am reading these posts) just imagine what Jesse’s oldest son and daughter have to be thinking? Vanilla Gorilla is everywhere, I’ve read about all his conquests at his office on the couch, down to what type of sex he likes, and you KNOW his kids are reading this same shit….yuck. In this day and age, especially, since news is immediate, it is so much worse. I know when I graduated 25 years ago, just think, computers were not anywhere, nor really were entertainment tv shows, dear God how did we get news?? Newspaper, in the time of Hedda Hopper, wow I wish I lived back in that time!

    Reply
  176. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    @Isee..:
    @Underwater:

    Yup – definitely not all the same person then!

    Reply
  177. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    @giveitup:

    Yeah – Angelina doesn’t know how to use the internet – she doesn’t even have a Blackberry! And her assistant most certainly doesn’t so no way could she have alerted E! to the fact that the twins weren’t twins in a fit of pique could she? Nah, especially not using that Blackberry she was pictured holding, no sirree! You really want to tug at this thread? Be my guest!

    Reply
  178. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    Not in this country baby! Lol

    Reply
  179. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I’m guessing you waited around all day for me to appear then copied and pasted my post into a Word doc to see what you could come up with huh? And you managed to come up with: “um, well technically oxbridge should be capitalised (perhaps you could remember to capitalise all your usernames then), you didn’t format your paragraphs and um well the grammar check on Word says it is ’she and Angelina’, not ‘her and Angelina’”? All I can say to that is: bitch please, you are embarrassing yourself! Oh, oops, sorry forgot to capitalise again that should say: “Bitch please, you are embarrassing yourself!” – now does that make it a bit clearer? Perhaps you should go back to the old “you forgot to put an apostrpohe in its” line – now that was a winner. Or maybe release another story about how Angelina suffered from post-natal depression with the twins she didn’t carry. You really are beginning to push it now, post-natal depression is a very serious condition that devastates a lot of women’s lives after pregnancy, not something to be bandied about to justify why your client has kept her kids hidden for the first 18 months of their lives and is now parading them on a balcony in Venice for the benefit of the boatloads of paps waiting below as if her life/career (same difference) depended on it. I think you’ll find that that might be taking things a bit too far for some people and who knows, maybe some day soon one little parrot may sqwuak. JMO!

    Reply
  180. Pattyanne said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    Actually I think that Sandra is taking the high road in all this sorid mess just as Jen Aniston did when her hubby was bumping uglies with Jolie. Sometimes it’s better to keep quiet and carry a big stick. I feel that like Jen, Sandra and yes Elin also, are better off without such scumbags. It’s just such a shame, as you pointed out Em, that small children are involved and will be reading all the dirt on dad in the future. In this technological age, everything is out there somewhere for the searching.@Emerson:

    Reply
  181. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    @dearlord:

    Oh no – your just a little innocent aren’t you?

    “Its all on the website and if you aren’t in the middle of a foaming at the mouth , i’m the only smart person here tantrum, it would be obvious what the lady was trying to say.”

    “which to a normal person would indicate she partook in a variety of courses in those fields. But go ahead and try to ridicule someone for whom English obviously isnt’ her first tongue if it makes you feel more superior. Frankly i think it just makes you look petty and mean.”

    “I see the expert on all things English has reared it’s ugly head once more – effectively driving off another intelligent commentor because heaven forbid anyone challenge how racist England truly can be in the upper education ranks. I would think this blog would welcome as many posters as it could – but alas Keane is flexing her muscles once again and insulting newcomers. Bravo Ian you must be so proud !!”

    And a few others that I can’t even be bothered to cut and paste before I’d even responded. No, not an attack dog at all are ya? No sirree!

    Reply
  182. Emerson said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Yep, that’s why I like these women/actors….such as Jen, and Nicole, and now Sandra. There is something to be said for taking the high road, and of course they are surounded by good friends/family, I hope. I just will not understand for a million years why, as the cheating is bad enough, but why oh why do none of these men use condoms, and why do the women proudly announce this fact? God, all I can think of is STD STD STD when I hear this….to so foolishly do this in this day and age is not only dreadfull but sooo irresponsible! It makes me want to hide under a rock somewhere, lol.

    Reply
  183. Chris from France said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    yeah well as you said, i don’t come often anymore, because i spend a lot of time taking care of my baby but i don’t have a balcony to prove it… too bad! i guess you have a lot in your hands with all jolie’s fans, i don’t understand why they keep coming here. anyway, it’s fun to come here and read everything. it’s distracting.

    Reply
  184. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    @Skycap:

    http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/univ/degrees/ma/

    The Cambridge MA
    In most UK universities, the Master of Arts is a degree awarded by examination. At Cambridge, the MA is conferred by right on holders of the BA degree of the University and on certain other senior members and is not available as a postgraduate qualification.

    Possession of the MA, or a postgraduate masters degree or doctorate, confers membership of the University Senate. This gives the right to:

    ■participate in Discussions (part of the University’s decision-making process)
    ■vote in the election of a new Chancellor or High Steward
    ■borrow books from the University Library
    Many colleges also offer their senior members the opportunity to dine at High Table on a certain number of occasions each year.

    This method of conferment of the MA also exists at the universities of Oxford and Dublin.

    Yawn.

    But hey, latinalady doesn’t need all you brand new usernames to defend her, I’m sure she can defend how she was the only person in Cambridge’s 750 year history who studied for a Masters in “Education in Language” but dropped it because she “wouldn’t conform” – despite her tutor’s desperate pleas! I was just wondering whether latinalady knew what kind of academic standards are required to qualify to do a postgraduate course at Oxbridge? It is pretty bloody high I can tell you. Put it this way, I wouldn’t qualify to do one and neither would most of my friends and we all have good degrees from there. In fact, 90% of Oxbridge grads would not qualify to do one either. Bet you didn’t know that little factoid either did you? Seriously guys, you are way out of your depth here. It’s like conducting a debate with a bunch of toddlers. Actually that’s a bit of an insult to toddlers – you lot are actually worse. At least a toddler doesn’t try to persuade someone who studied at Oxford that they did too! Seriously guys, that’s what you sound like. Give it up before you make yourselves look even more ridiculous. I really am shaking my head in disbelief here.

    Reply
  185. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    @Chris from France:

    To be honest I find it funny lately too. If anything whoever she is paying to do this is even stupider than last year’s bunch of monkeys. And that really takes some doing. I guess times are tough!

    Reply
  186. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @Skycap:

    Nope, if you google Masters Cambridge University the first link it will take you to (strange that as it was down at about sixth place yesterday, maybe a few people have been doing a bit of research lately huh?) will take you directly to the page on the website where it says this:

    The Cambridge MA
    In most UK universities, the Master of Arts is a degree awarded by examination. At Cambridge, the MA is conferred by right on holders of the BA degree of the University and on certain other senior members and is not available as a postgraduate qualification.

    Possession of the MA, or a postgraduate masters degree or doctorate, confers membership of the University Senate. This gives the right to:

    ■participate in Discussions (part of the University’s decision-making process)
    ■vote in the election of a new Chancellor or High Steward
    ■borrow books from the University Library
    Many colleges also offer their senior members the opportunity to dine at High Table on a certain number of occasions each year.

    This method of conferment of the MA also exists at the universities of Oxford and Dublin.

    By the way – was just wondering if your username latinalady knew how difficult it is to get a place to do a post-grad course at Oxbridge and how in fact 90% of Oxbridge grads do not themselves qualify for it? Just another small but pretty crucial little technicality which makes poor old latinalady’s desperate assertion that she dropped out of her Masters in Education in Language that doesn’t exist because she wouldn’t conform a little tricky to swallow. Unless she would like to tell me what that little technicality is and how she qualified for it. This little game really can keep me entertained all night!

    Reply
  187. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    @B:

    Ha ha – that’s a good analysis! And thanks, that’s what I’m here for. Hope you keep enjoying the show.

    Oh and it was the bombshell Nazi chick that said he and Sandy had a “contract”. I think it’s pretty obvious what that referred to.

    Reply
  188. Chris from France said on March 30th, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    don’t you think they’re just fans of the holly family, true believers that are sure we’re evil, need to be burned ? they sound like the real fanatics you know, big fits, no brain, “we’ll prove you wrong”, they obviously can’t stand when people don’t think like them. i don’t understand that, i don’t like the brangelina, i don’t go to websites that worship them, i don’t see the point. i think they like to hate, to trash, and to be pissed at everyone. but the fun part is that reading them going madly after everyone, like some crazy baby dog, that’s really funny at the end of the day !!

    Reply
  189. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    @Chris from France:

    Some of them are loons/trolls etc, Mia/Lory is an obvious one for an example. These are not though, they are suddenly created new usernames which always try to claim the same thing: they went to oxford/cambridge, they worked for the BBC etc, just to try to discredit anything I or sometimes Kate says – same old, same old – and when they get caught out they just invent a hundred other usernames to carry it on. I honestly find it really entertaining now. Remember this discussion is not about Brangelina, it’s about Sandra Bullock. Loons wouldn’t give an eff about defending her!

    Reply
  190. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Hey I just realised I have a Masters – I never really thought about it until now! I am going to start writing it on my CV! Thanks latinalady/Angelina’s keyboard monkeys – that could really sharpen up my Education and Qualfications section! And were beginning to think that commenting here wouldn’t achieve anything positive – you couldn’t have been more wrong!!! Lol

    Reply
  191. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    @giveitup:

    Ooh I see you’ve been a long time reader then – that was over a year ago! Glad to see I inspire such loyalty in my readership! Lol

    Reply
  192. Tinkuy said on March 30th, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    @give it up:
    It’s evident that the self-proclaimed queen is a few pecans short of a fruitcake.

    Reply
  193. alif said on March 30th, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    @1:40p.m.
    My first reaction upon reading that news item, was that she’s going there to sabotage him. Matter of fact, it screamed out at me! I thought about it, and asked myself: “Is she going to present herself as a loyal, loving, honest supporter? Or will she want to be photographed and then be back in the news, again?
    Hmm!

    Keane;
    Don’t dwell on the grammar mistakes. I make them all the time! Some of the greatest minds have made them; (so I don’t bother to focus on my less-than-great self.) We sometimes type so fast that we don’t bother to check; or someone calls to us, or something else distracted us.
    I catch grammatical mistakes in published books; on CNN today; just a heckuva lot, since the internet took over a huge part of peoples’ lives.

    Back to the thread: I hope she does something soon; unless she’s milking this for maximum effect. JMO!
    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    P.S. I’m just finishing an impressively written book about classic Hollywood. Sure enough, I found an error.

    Reply
  194. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 7:07 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    Hurrah – you are back, I missed you! You must have resisted the urge to respond to my posts for a good hour now, that’s an achievement! Seriously though, I love having you around, never leave me will you? A girl can never get lonely when she has James Haven’s cyber stalker monkey for company! Lol

    So anyway James, how are you, how you been? Long time no chat! It’s been ages. By the way, it’s funny you showed up again cos I only just figured out why I’ve suddenly got the wind up your sails, it literally just hit me in the face! The Daily Mail really is just a step up from The Sun isn’t it Jamey boy? Such a rag, full of lies, except when it’s positive press fed to you about dear old Angie hey? Come now James, no need to be afraid – what have you and Angelina got to hide after all? Positive pair of saints you two hey? Anyhoo, can’t wait for you to reply, I’ve missed our chats so much. By the way, that pic of Angelina as a 15 year old (cough, bullshit, she’s about 19) post her first nose job really has been doing some job of squashing all the negative stories from Venice and the set of The Tourist hey. Yano that odd pic of her looking down at her conical tits, the stuff about Jonny Depp not wanting to get within 10 miles of her and the increasingly insane-looking daily baby flash she gives to the paps on the balcony a la the man she is rapidly morphing into The King of Pop, MJ himself, that sort of thing. Don’t suppose there’s too many of those left where her nose looks reasonably similar enough to her current one left to use though hey? We’re slowly running out of cards aren’t we James? Slowly running out indeed. What not only the twins but the supposedly estranged father (ha ha), the pics of her as a (ahem) 15y/o and the twins in a variety of combinations (Viv x 1, Knox x 1, Viv and Knox with assistance of nanny etc). Yup, we’re kind of running out aren’t we? Maybe time for a re-run of the Oscar party-night snog-fest? Seriously, James, it couldn’t really get much more desperate.

    Lots of love Keane.

    Reply
  195. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 7:14 pm

    @alif:

    Alif I’m not bothered about other people’s grammatical mistakes and typos as I know full well we all make them when we type first and can’t be bothered to read it over to correct it. Just saying someone who writes with that degree of errors and uses general garbled nonsense instead of argument did not get a place at Cambridge. And definitely not to do a post-graduate course which only the top 10% of graduates of Cambridge and comparable institutions qualify for. The people who are obsessed with where I’m putting a capital letter, paragraph or an apostrophe and are trying to make the whole discussion abour grammar does not include me. Check out the number of posts directed at me v the ones I made initially. I have not spent all day thinking about the grammar of a phony poster on the internet believe me – I’ve been busy at work!

    Reply
  196. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 30th, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    @Tinkuy:

    Oh by the way foolio, it’s irony – yeah, no don’t worry about it. You could always look that up. You have Word and google at your disposal we know that, I’ll give you a 24 hour head start. But I know you must be a little sensitive about the “Queen” epithet, I know how you’ve worked so hard to make Queen Angie. You’re the “Queen-maker” if you will, ha ha ha! And it was all going so well for a while wasn’t it? Someone flew a little too close to the sun though didn’t he? Mistake!

    Reply
  197. Isee said on March 30th, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Keane, you are crazy imo. What are you talking about ‘…release another story about how Angelina suffered from post-natal depression with the twins she didn’t carry…’? What on earth does that have to do with my post correcting your grammar and spelling? You make me laugh!!

    Reply
  198. Lauren said on March 31st, 2010 at 1:59 am

    Jesse James goes to rehab in AZ…

    http://www.tmz.com/2010/03/31/jesse-james-rehab-arizona-sierra-tuscon-drugs-alcohol-sex-addition-mistresses/

    Reply
  199. lurkeyloo said on March 31st, 2010 at 9:00 am

    Geez…I see some things never change. I come back to read the TOPIC comments and everyone is fighting.

    Reply
  200. dearlord said on March 31st, 2010 at 9:12 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Nope not an attack at all – just my opinion – oops sorry forgot you’re the only one who seems to be allowed to respond and respond and respond to posts. And speaking of attacks – hello pot have you met kettle? Look in the mirror sunshine-you can only play the “it’s not me – it’s them” game for so long before someone calls you out on your bullshit. And people will every time, because you make people bristle with your perceived superiority when in actuality its obvious that you are a deeply insecure person who tries to overcompensate by being aggressive. I feel sorry for you. May God Bless you

    Reply
  201. Pattyanne said on March 31st, 2010 at 9:59 am

    I think he’s hoping that the Tiger Woods method will work for him as well. His ex-wife says he has had this “problem” for ages, and if anything can change his mind set about this behavior, it is this. Hopefully it will because it would be nearly criminal for so many people in Jesse’s life to be so deeply hurt for nothing. Personally, I can’t see Sandra returning to Jesse even if he spent the rest of his life in rehab . The Vanilla Gorilla is loose and will never be contained now. @Lauren:

    Reply
  202. Emerson said on March 31st, 2010 at 11:07 am

    @Pattyanne:
    I cannot imagine why he is so upset now and willing to do anything? He obviouslly did not care for the past 6 years what he did to his wife/family, and that is just beyond my comprehension…why get married for God’s sake? Stay single and be a pig! Did you see Dr. Drew comment on how he is a sex addict and Sandra is a love addict and they should not stay together since they’ve been together only a short time and have no family?? I’m like wtf? What were his kids? And, why is it possible for Tiger to change but not Jesse? (not that I like Jesse, just not understanding the logic) The Vanilla Gorilla is just a fug to look at as well, yuck….

    Reply
  203. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 11:15 am

    @dearlord:

    Thanks so much for your blessings – that is certainly a lot nicer than your original five or six posts attacking me before I had even had a chance to read the first one and was in fact nowhere near the site! Lol Pretty funny. Was the problem that they did not post originally so you had to keep doing new ones to make sure? Got a lot invested in this haven’t ya?! Oh by the way, if you weren’t sure what attacking someone is, it is the following:

    “if you aren’t in the middle of a foaming at the mouth , i’m the only smart person here tantrum”

    “if it makes you feel more superior. Frankly i think it just makes you look petty and mean.”

    “I see the expert on all things English has reared it’s ugly head once more”

    “I would think this blog would welcome as many posters as it could – but alas Keane is flexing her muscles once again and insulting newcomers. Bravo Ian you must be so proud !!”

    Does breaking it down into smaller quotes make it easier for you to process? Oh and yes, stone the bloody crows but I think I am allowed to respond to someone who has written 5 or 6 posts towards me, bitched about me incessantly and then made up some other usernames to bitch about me some more. Sorry folks, I know what you’ve all wanted for over a good year now is freedom to attack me and/or Ian without fear of being responded to but as I’ve said time and time again, it just ain’t gonna happen. Life’s just one real bey-otch hey? Ha ha ha. By the way, keep making it all about me, won’t ya? I’m sure that’s helping.

    Reply
  204. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 11:22 am

    @Isee:

    Um, now just remind me, your the one who wrote a post about how I had outrageously not bothered to capitalise “Oxbridge” am I right? Sorry sweetheart but in whose universe does that constitute correcting someone’s grammar and spelling? Not the one I’m living in that’s for sure! Do you know what it really was? It was being a lame-ass – sorry! Oh and yeah, you could always go for the “Keane is mad” argument again – that one hasn’t been trotted out for a good year now – may as well give it another bash hey? Oh and you did it under the username Tinkuy too so it follows a theme – it could be a go-er! So anyway James, glad to hear you’re still alive and kicking – mwah!

    Reply
  205. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 11:52 am

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!

    Three words James: In Touch magazine.

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

    I guess you couldn’t shut him up after all then?

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

    No wonder you’ve had her on that damn balcony with those adorable babies and even your poor old pop day after day after day after day. If I was just about to get a story like that coming out about me, I would be too!

    May I present to the assembled masses: Queen Psycholina!

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

    You lot bloody kill me!

    Reply
  206. Koko said on March 31st, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    Please people lets stop arguing about silly technicalities!!
    You are being lied to on a daily basis by the media lets talk about that!!!My grammar& spelling sucks I know, but I would like to post
    here without getting a complex about my lack of intelligence/education.
    I’m not interested in peoples spelling mistakes I’m interested in their ideas.

    Reply
  207. brw said on March 31st, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    Any one have ant thoughts on the Katy Perry Russell Brand .Love story or fauxmance?
    Any one else think it’s cool Ricky Martin came out? congrats Ricky!! Hope others follow! :)

    Reply
  208. Pattyanne said on March 31st, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    True Em. I doubt seriously that Jesse truly wants to change his ways. He’s just reacting to getting caught in such a public manner, and doing damage control imo. I do hope Sandra just ends it, and moves on with her life with her head held high. I’m so sick and tired of the other woman receiving publicity creating a false image of moral values in the US. No wife causes her husband to cheat. He has to WANT to cheat like a coward, rather than to go to the wife and inform her that there is a problem or that he has a pre-existing problem. There is nothing admirable about lying, cheating or stealing in my book. And the low life whores who set their caps for such a married celebrity so that they can hire Gloria Alred and get a huge monetary bonus for doing the same thing as a prostitute sickens me. How can we expect better of our children when we condone by our silence, such behavior?@Emerson:

    Reply
  209. Emerson said on March 31st, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    AMEN! That is def the best way of stating it! They all just sicken me, all over the news….just stay single if you want to pick up random women from the internet, stay single, easy easy easy….I never could get why Sandra hooked up with him to begin with, but when I saw how in love they “looked” I thought wow, maybe that type of guy (tattood, mechanic, etc.) has more to offer, well now I’ll go back to my normal tastes, LOL>

    Reply
  210. Emerson said on March 31st, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    that is def pretty interesting, and I am sure 100% true! She is a psycho! I just wonder how this man is getting around with telling his story? I am sure he has to be in hiding…

    Reply
  211. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    @Emerson:

    I don’t know but I am seriously laughing so much about this sh*t right now it has made my day. All I can say is:

    Well done Noah!

    And:

    Poor Angie!

    LMAO

    Reply
  212. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    And James’ keyboard monkeys are suddenly nowhere to be seen!

    Classic.

    Reply
  213. dearlord said on March 31st, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    you really think James Haven has any clue who you are? WOW your delusion knows no end

    Reply
  214. Emerson said on March 31st, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I must say, it’s some pretty good shit, plus true true true!!!!

    Reply
  215. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    @dearlord:

    Nah – he’s like such a big star – I have never even been within the same time zone as a star of that magnitude of course! When James Haven walks into the room angels stop polishing their halos and shoot down to earth to worship at the feet of the man they know as “Jamie Heaven”. He is like a beautiful immortal spirit captured in human flesh. Words simply cannot describe this man’s allure. If only… sigh. Does that answer your question Jamie? Gone PRETTY quiet all of a sudden! Lol

    Reply
  216. dearlord said on March 31st, 2010 at 3:54 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    seriously Keane seek medical help – i worry about you.

    Reply
  217. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    @dearlord:

    Do you? That’s nice to know! I worry about you too Jamie. I REALLY worry about you if you know what I’m saying! I take it you’ve been following me for some time then?

    Reply
  218. lurkeyloo said on March 31st, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Please. Give. It. A. Rest. STOP ARGUING!!! It all sounds so childish and stupid…not to mention FAR off topic.

    Reply
  219. dearlord said on March 31st, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    no sorry not your number one fan. heard of the site at FF and came over to see what the fuss was about. Not much from what i can gather. Ther’es you, some Patty Anne chick and a couple of others, pretty boring actually.

    Reply
  220. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    @dearlord:

    Forgot to say thanks for that bloody virus by the way! That was so decent of you!

    Reply
  221. curious said on March 31st, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    My thought is if Jesse James is a racist….Now his dear wife MUST HAVE KNOW HE IS A RACIST and PROBABLY SHARES HIS RACISTS VIEWS. What wife doesnt know something like this from her husband. Oh may I mention she is half german and had a grandfather who worked at NUREMBERG….Coincidence????!!! You make the calculation. Definitely has skeleton in her closet.

    Reply
  222. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    @dearlord:

    Ha ha ha – love how you’re trying to mimic my casual, couldn’t give a (Jamie’s Keyboard) monkeys attitude affter spewing half a dozen violently angry, bitching tirades against me – bit late for that move Jamie! Oh and I’m slightly confused about the “oh no I only just found the site and poor little duh old me didn’t know who you even were comment” when you’ve already claimed that you “worry about me” (that’s nice to know) and are familiar with conversations I had a good 6 months to a year ago now i.e.:

    “I see the expert on all things English has reared it’s ugly head once more”

    “I would think this blog would welcome as many posters as it could – but alas Keane is flexing her muscles once again and insulting newcomers.”

    Jamie, Jamie, Jamie – just can’t keep up these days can you? (Not that you ever could of course). Just too many wolves at too many doors right now huh? Ha ha ha ha ha. Couldn’t happen to two nicer people. He he he.

    Reply
  223. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 31st, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    Oh Jamie don’t leave me just as it’s getting entertaining! Chicken! Lol

    Reply
  224. Lauren said on March 31st, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Oh I don’t think he’s sincere much at all. I was listening to the radio the other day and the show played a clip of an interview that Jesse did with Howard Stern about his sex-life with Sandra. I was shocked he would even talk about it considering how private she is about those things, but the things he said were just flat out lies. Things like “I only have sex with my wife,” “My wife’s the best I’ve ever had,” “My sex-life is perfect now that I’m married.” The interview was done just last year. I think he may be a bit ashamed after what came out, and he might feel bad about what he’s done to Sandra and his family, but I think he’s just doing this to win whatever points he can doing the divorce (which I hope goes through).

    Have you seen the picture of him doing the Nazi salute?

    Reply
  225. Isee said on March 31st, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    How funny you actually think I’m James Haven!, I am also not Tinkuy – WRONG AGAIN!

    I live in Australia. That’s probably why it takes a while to respond, because I do have to sleep and work, duh! You think you frightened me away with your oh so intelligent posts because you studied at OOooxbribdge or something LOL. I have a Bachelor degree…big deal. Some of the most successful and intelligent people in the world didn’t have much in the way of education. Some of the people who have had a great impact on the world also didn’t have much of an education. Your blah blah blahing about OOooxbridge is so boring to the point it is almost nauseating. Time to get into the real world girl, let it go, get over it.

    I don’t really care about Brangelina or Aniston, I just think this site is good for a laugh (especially the old days when the subject matter included bulldogs and cross dressing etc). You take it all way too seriously. I know you don’t think that people can come here just to have a good old laugh without really caring about the subject matter, but it is possible. And, yes, we should be able to come here even if we do not take the content seriously, you don’t own this site, it is a free for all whether you like it or not.

    By the way, you didn’t answer my earlier post. Here it is again – “What are you talking about ‘…release another story about how Angelina suffered from post-natal depression with the twins she didn’t carry…’? What on earth does that have to do with my post correcting your grammar and spelling?”

    One last thing, you really should use more paragraphs in your writing as they become difficult to read, especially when it is white text on a black background. Just a helpful hint.

    Reply
  226. dearlord said on April 1st, 2010 at 6:55 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Well you are one smart cookie. You have figured out Angie and my diobotical plans to take over the world, one obscure website at a time. Damn it Foiled again. Oh well, back to the drawing board me thinks. Can’t believe we’ve been outwitted so completely by such an adversary. Although it stands to reason as Sherlock Holmes was a British character so obviously British people are so much more intelligent – I told Angie we should’ve used a Voodoo spell -damn it worked on Brad.

    Reply
  227. Pattyanne said on April 1st, 2010 at 10:22 am

    Yes Lauren, in fact I saw that infamous photo just last night. What poor judgement for him to pose that way, the man is a thoughtless idiot i’d say. I have been reading that Sandra has German roots, but aside from that I haven’t read anything else about it; to me this is about what an azz her hubby is for what he’s done to his wife, just as Tiger Woods did to Elin, and one can also find comparrisons to what hubby Brad Pitt did to wifie Jen with Bombshell Jolie. Will men never learn? Always want their cake and eat it to? I personally don’t know one woman who would remain in a marriage with forewarning her hubby intends to cheat, especially in this day of AIDS and MRSA. I suppose that’s why their men don’t take the honorable way and go to said wife with the warning that they feel an urge to cheat. They damn well know they’d be handed their freedom in a heartbeat. BUT…seems they don’t want to MARRY the hos, they just want to play around. BTW, I know a few females who also qualify for a Woods/James/Pitt award of Unfaithfulness as well.@Lauren:

    Reply
  228. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 1st, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    @dearlord:

    Oh James – that was so lame – start over! Lol

    Reply
  229. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 1st, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @Isee:

    You need to take that “ooh stop going on about your education you’re making me feel inferior” schtick to your other username latinalady my friend, ’twas she who brought it up for no reason whatsover – oh except to demonstrate that The Daily Mail was only one step up from The Sun of course! (Which admittedly was a curious diss on her part as The Sun always print Angie’s PR amd are of course owned by the boss of the company who produced her latest turkey-flavoured offering, Salt – hope she didn’t upset Mr Murodch too much with that!). Oh and you come from Australia of course – I should have known! Oh and you work too? Oh ok I take it back then, you definitely can’t be James Haven then – he doesn’t work! Lol Oh and the paragraph thing again – I think you might have done that one already Jamie! Hurting your poor wickle eyes reading my posts is it? Maybe you should try to restrain yourself from reading them then! Although I have to say I do find it flattering that you devote so much of your attention to little old me when you have so many other problems on your plate these days! But don’t worry, I will take your helpful hint and try to use paragraphs in my future posts more dilligently. We’ve got to make sure as many people read them as possible now don’t we? Lol

    Reply
  230. Chris said on April 1st, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    You are a bore – too much time on your hands? LIve with lots of cats? Lots of bridesmaid dresses hanging in the closet? Wouldn’t be surprised.

    Oh and a special hi to Chris from France. You BFFs.

    Now let’s get beck to Ian’s topic, not your lectures.

    Reply
  231. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 1st, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @Chris:

    And back it comes the moment I return to the board a whole 24 hours later – you could set your watch by it! James, I’m telling you, if this PR/management work for Skeletina Psycholie Features ever runs dry – you could have a future in time-keeping! Those bug eyes of yours would look stunning sitting astride a grandfather clock too (oo-er!).

    Reply
  232. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on April 1st, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    @Chris:

    Oh and yeah a few of us are friends on this board James, but don’t go worrying your pretty head about what that concept entails now – it’s obvious you wouldn’t have heard of it!

    Reply
  233. secutor said on April 6th, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Why is everybody shooting at Sandra? Leave here alone- she is a saint.

    Reply
  234. NLP Book · said on November 4th, 2010 at 4:31 am

    Sandra Bullock is one the greatest actress in my opnion, she plays a lot of different roles ~

    Reply
  235. penis enlargement said on April 8th, 2011 at 7:58 am

    Wonderful article. I was checking constantly to this blog and I am so inspired! Very educational information, especially the third paragraphs. I really need such information. I used to be seeking this kind of information for quite some times. Thank you and all the best. vimax penis enlargement pills XR2011LAIN_AING

    Reply
  236. How Sandra Bullock Found Out - Nardu said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    [...] IUC Exclusive: Sandra Bullock Has Too Many Skeletons!!!!This is what I found so offensive about Ian’s thread. Why is it “obvious” Jesse has something, cough, cough, very incriminating on his wife? Because she didn’t come out and hav… [...]

  237. How Sandra Bullock Found Out - Keada said on March 26th, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    [...] Bullock In Today's Twitter-Wood; friendwww Sandra Bullock's friends speculate on her future actiHow Sandra Bullock Found Out – ffkevin30 how sandra bullock found out; mcgeneral 'Hot Tub Time Machine,' WrestleMania XXVI And [...]

  238. Sandra Bullock Pregnant | VsCon said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:13 pm

    [...] bullock facebook, sandra bullock pregnant, michelle mcgee website, michellebombshell.com officialSandra Bullock Pregnant – tags: jessie james mistresses, jesse james mistresses pictures, how sandra bullock found out, [...]

  239. Sandra Bullock Pregnant - Keada said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    [...] bullock facebook, sandra bullock pregnant, michelle mcgee website, michellebombshell.com officialSandra Bullock Pregnant – tags: jessie james mistresses, jesse james mistresses pictures, how sandra bullock found out, [...]

  240. Internet E Club | Home said on March 27th, 2010 at 10:19 am

    [...] http://ianundercover.com/2010/03/26/iuc-exclusive-sandra-bullock-has-too-many-skeletons/Do these “celebrity” men not think that whores have ulterior motives? If I were in their shoes (and thank God I’m not!) the first thing I would think would be “ummm what are these women trying to get from me? ….. I think that a long-term relationship is actually less work on her part – less men to contract, less photo opps to do – and we have to remember she wasn’t doing that much in the acting vein until The Blind Side came out, she was more of a Producer. … [...]

  241. Iuc Exclusive: Sandra Bullock has Too Many Skeletons!!!! said on March 27th, 2010 at 10:51 am

    [...] come out and have a strip-off against Dudshell McJokey?, because she didn’t …Page 2 Cancel [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Meta