Review of Brangelina Book – Check it Out

Posted on March 24th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

brangelina2My sources say more trouble is brewing in Brangie’s camp. Apparently Brad is not thrilled how much time Angie spends apart from the children. Check out today’s review of my book (Blogcritics)

  1. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 9:29 am

    ummmm, all you have to do is look at the kids when they are with Angelina to find this to be true…they do not interact at all, and look somber and sad…if Brad were man enough, which he has proven again and again not to be, he should take those kids far far away and raise them in a stable home, complete with their own individual bedrooms, put them in a normal school and try to live somehow other than a nomad existence…Angelina’s “I’m taking a year off to just be a mom” never materialized, she bebops all over the place and I am sure she will never live a normal life…she’ll always be chasing that “high” no matter what form it comes in….travel, drugs, buying babies, women, men, both, etc….I have lost all respect for Brad, he is such a sap. sad sad for all of these children, who at such young ages, are showing signs of instability…they should call in a therapist, call in the guard, call in the grandparents, lol. This is all leading to a very sad ending…

    Reply
  2. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 10:23 am

    I said it before and I’ll say it again; I loved the book Ian (Brangelina-The Untold Story of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie). Angie’s life was put in chronological order of events which gave the reader a better understanding of why Angie is Angie. Page 39 was a reveal; ” In the case of Angelina Jolie, the official diagnosis was considerably more serious. Sitting in her Beverly Hills High School file to this day is a troubling description, delivered by a psychotherapist who had been treating her for some time: “Angelina Voight is unrestrained, inclined to antisocial psychopathy.” In Other Words, While Still In Her Teens Angelina Was Labeled A Psychopath. ” WHEW! We, the general public suspected she had bats in her bellfrey, but this made it official and documented way , way back! A real Ah Ha! moment. Then, thinking that would surely be the most damaging revelation, I read on page 133, the chapter titled “Brotherly Love”, and was shocked even more, but understood now the psychopath (sociopath) diagnosis better for it. Jolie kissed her brother passionately , while accepting her Oscar and this nearly deep sixed her HW career! A quote from Brangelina on page 131, ” When the kiss happened, not everybody could see it. I didn’t get a clear look myself, but I heard the guy lean over to the actreess sitting beside him and say as clear as day, “Do you think she’s fuc*ing him?” I think just about everybody in the auditorium wondered that after they heard her speech>” You see, Jolie has said publicly that she sees nothing wrong with incest between conscenting adults…well, well, well. Hummmmmm. So the sociopathic Jolie decided to manipulate the press reports and public opinion that would ruin any chance of an acting career due to her “brotherly love” being so in-your-face at the Oscars by…..marrying BBT~! No matter that he was engaged to Laura Dern who was overseas shooting a film. He suited Angie’s purpose, to manipulate public opinion away from the incestuous woman to a wild, sexual being so in love with a male not related to her by blood. Exit Laura, enter Angie. Page 161, most likely this “rumor” was put out there by her minions, just as she later came up with the lie that Jennifer Aniston didnt’ want babies after she broke up their marriage. Now , Page 161, “The new gossip started with a blind item–a vague and unsupported referrence to a celebrity–leaked to a New York newspaper AT THE HEIGHT OF THE INCEST ALLEGATIONS–”Which Oscar-winning actress is earning a reputation as a home-wrecker?” Goodbye Laura, hello Angie. The fact that Billy Bob Thornton’s fourth wife swore in court papers that Thornton told her he was diagnosed by a psychiatrist as a manic depressive and that he was taking lithium on a daily basis, but quit taking his meds a few months later might explain how Angie was able to bring about this sudden “fauxmance” with BBT.

    There is so much more to be learned from your book Ian, that I keep it handy for referrence when I come across an article in which it is clear Angie’s team is trying to put a clean spin on her dirty deeds yet again.

    Brad was and remains a fool. He let his private parts and desire to taste the low side of sex get control over his heart and brain. He is now paying for it. Jolie lives in her own private hell of her making, and will continue to spin false truths to cover her chyt until her looks fade enough that no man will be willing to participate in her risky ventures. That will then be the end of Angelina Jolie Voight Miller Thornton.

    Reply
  3. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 10:33 am

    @Pattyanne:
    FINALLY ordered the book, so I will be reading it this weekend…cannot wait! I have just never seen a “star” so messed up before..her lines in her movies are screamed, she doesn’t look like she can act at all when we see the pics from Venice and those poor “twins” must be fraternal, ’cause they look NOTHING alike, lol! I keep saying this and will say it again, I really, really want to have someone write a book on her mother….while I realize the psychopathy can be explained for her behavoir, I still just think there was something WAY off about her mother!! What mother does the things she did with Angelina and James? I am SURE she knew of their incest, perhaps joined in? Don’t get up in arms people, just thinking out loud. There was something not right with her mother, not at all….I wonder if that side of the family had a history of psychiatric issues? JV doesn’t seem to be a nut case…I want to know about the mother…

    Reply
  4. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 11:38 am

    How true Em, in fact I also think a book on Marcia Lynne Bertrand Voight would be a real interesting read. Maybe Ian will do one on her after he’s finished with his projects in the works now. Marcia raised both kids, and it’s not true that John Voight abandoned them, he lived nearby for some time and there are millions of photos that document this fact. Did you know that John Voight has a brother who is a world respected geologist and professor ?, or that his brother Chip wrote the song Wild Thing? John comes from a very respected family, and it is this side of Angie that she chose to ignore for such a long time as, I believe, she wants no critism or direction advice from daddy. Mom on the other hand , moved in Angie’s b/f to live with them when Angie was just 14 y/o, and at that age or near it, Angie slept with her mother’s long time b/f. Imagine how that would feel to a woman, your 14 y/o sexually active daughter who has a live-in b/f actually seduces your lover? One world – psychopath. That’s Angie. Moral values mean nothing to her, people actually don’t have much value to her except as pawns in her life’s fantasy. Sociopaths have NO feelings or compassion for anyone other than themselves. If they want to do it, then it’s okay. SICK! How this woman could legally adopt children is another subject that blows my mind. It’s open knowledge in HW how mental Angie is, what a bad penny she is, and what trouble she is. Brad Pitt HAD to have known this going in, and it’s been printed that George Clooney couldn’t believe his buddy Brad was actually going for it with this scum. Angie will bring Angie down. It’s inevitable .@Emerson:

    Reply
  5. Kate said on March 24th, 2010 at 12:11 pm

    LOL I think my review of your book was better j/k okay now on the serious IAN, Brange -how much more trouble does it take ? We have drugs, suicide attempts, fights like war of the roses, heavy drinking, swinging doors with various partners, bored as a horse that does not know it is dead, kids horrified as they witness this mess, nannies so concerned they call DHS, and Brad is bothered because she does not spend time with the kids? Honest? Is that for real? He is not bothered that she orchestrates a photo opp every other day in Venice, matching all their little outfits, taking them out in the wind and chill with sleepy eyes, toting them around like luggage with the body guards? He is not bothered by that? Is he not aware of the stark difference people see with the Depp family and the PItt family, and who appears to be the better father?

    Interesting that Ted C in his Truth & Lies is saying they are oh so fine and showing Angies little dress up lingerie and that Brad is still having the best sex of his life, all the while Brad gave a rambling stoned intoxicated (or so it appeared) to The Sun about how bored he is to the point he is smoking again (Take that Angie, no more hiding) and drinking, and that is why he grows the beard, not depressed,he did not say it was a cock block, but may has well have said.

    IAN, we know you are buys working on your documentary right now, but honey can’t you give us something that you DID not put in the book. LOL How about the contract law suit, did you find out if it was off? Just sitting there as a veiled threat? The paternity suit, those blood test should be back by now, what is happening with Amna?

    This is not meaty enough, what kind of drugs is she doing still, she is getting thinner and thinner, him too?

    Be Brave, this is blog, not a book….

    :) Kate

    Reply
  6. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 12:12 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Sad sad, interesting about George Clooney, I did not hear that anywhere..and did not know anything about JV family, although it’s obvious from his behavoir, his film career, that he is def the normal part of the family. There is just something not right about her mother and the way she was raised…me thinks Angie needs years and years of daily therapy, lol, like that will ever happen. Her odd behavoirs just started so young, and I now a lot of people who had just single moms (I realize JV was still in the pic) and turnd out normal…but, um sleeping with her mother’s boyfriend? cutting herself? collecting knives? incest with brother Jamie? coloring her hair? etc. etc., there are a million things that revolve around her mother…something was just not right with her mother…maybe split personality?? Brad is a fool of the highest order and deserves all the misery he gets, and shame on him for bringing more and more children into this nut house…those kids don’t stand a chance. He should take more of the blame, since he knows Angie is nuts, 24 hour sex or not…I mean who really has sex for 24 hours? If everyone does, then I’m missing something! lol I still cannot get over the fact that her mother left a nasty comment in her will directed at Jon Voight…I keep trying to find the quote, but can’t…that speaks VOLUMNS as to her true personality! When my mother was dying, the last thing on her mind was “getting even” with someone who “wronged” her….I think there are more important things to consider and reflect on while you are dying, and being vindictive is def not one of them..IAN PLEASE write a book on her!!

    Reply
  7. jan/sa said on March 24th, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    i totally agree with you ladies. for a man i do not even know but by the interviews and his actions i have no respect for this pityfull man how any body in their right mind could think jen wants this dirty, conceited and non person back in her life is unbelieveable. of all the hollywood stars over the years i have never disliked and dispised a person like mr manny. pitt. how he can be happy with what the media protrays of him and his mistress any man with balls would come out and at least try to defend the ex and the current piece of ass.
    he is now getting what he deserves and is now just a gloryfied manny/kiddie caretaker that has to depend on the little lady to bring home the bacon. as for jolie well for her i have no words and she falls well below my radar i have met ladies of the night with more class and feeling for their kids and would not sell the childrens lives for the fame and pr that these two morons have done. i wish they would take the time to read the blogs and realize that people think they are lower than low as parents and as human beings, and then take their children home and start giving them the life they as kids deserve. a stable home ,schooling and a normal circle of friends and a stay at home mom and dad as really we have seen enough of their shitty movies to last a life time and photo ops as well.
    i think that i lost most of my respect when he denounced god and would not own up to his and her affair and let the ex be rediculed and belittled by their paid mouth piece and loonie fans. but let me end now as about these two i could type a 1000 pages of what makes me dispise them and their pr faming ways oh one more thing is their need to tell us how they dish money out to the poor and then buy tickets to fly to space which would keep a small country in food and medical supplies for more than a year. jmo

    Reply
  8. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    Em, I thought you might have missed seeing this – it’s Angelina Voight’s high school photo that shows what she normally looks like (pre all that plastic surgery)….very interesting I thought.

    http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/3585/m9ad8kux0.jpg

    Reply
  9. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    ROFLMAO!!! What?? Who?? As IF she has had no work done!!! Do these fools really believe people think they are great, and the ones that actually do, are they nuts?? I def believe so…Brad is such a MESS, God why does his family not step up and try to do something, anything? They are the normal mid Western family with values, I just cannot believe they are no where to be found?? SHAME on Brad for allowing his children to live the way they do….those new pics of the twins on the balcony reminded me of Michael Jackson, I was waiting for one of them to hang them over the balcony, jk…but I will say for twins, even fraternal twins, they look NOTHING alike!! This about wants me to apply for a nanny, just to give them someone normal to deal with (not that i’m normal, lol) but STILL!! Everyone look for the quote in Marcia’s will that was read after she died, I’ve had zero luck…

    Reply
  10. LatinaLady said on March 24th, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    Found it on link below further down the page, states how JV owed her back child support.

    http://www.angelinajoliewatch.com/category/marcheline-bertrand/

    Reply
  11. LatinaLady said on March 24th, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    Sorry Spousal Support, not Child support.

    Reply
  12. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    LOL, not only do the “twins” look nothing alike, but if you go back over the first photo ops of them, and save that photo of Knox, then keep advancing and saving photos of “Knox” you will find it isn’t even the same child in all the photos. It seems Angie has NO boundaries whatsoever when she sets out to create a fantasy. There are even photos of her so called twin pregnancy that cast huge doubt that she was even the vehicle of their birth. The great proof was a photo op of Brad climbing rocks on an island, reaching backward to pull Angie by the rail thin upper arm, while she was carrying Zahara on her hip ….. and the prothesis pregnant belly slipped sideways on her frame so that it looked like a huge pimple on her hip…… not a good photo op that one!@Emerson:

    Reply
  13. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    “Bertrand married actor Jon Voight on December 12, 1971. The couple had two children: actor James Haven and actress Angelina Jolie. Bertrand and Voight separated in 1976 and divorced in 1978. In 1978, Bertrand met documentary filmmaker Bill Day (Saviors of the Forest and Missionary Positions, among others). Day and Bertrand lived together for 12 years in Beverly Hills and New York City. Numerous miscarriages ended their hopes of having their own children. As business partners in Woods Road Productions, they developed a film project called Amazonia and sold it to film director Ridley Scott, but the project never took off.

    After her split from Day in 1993,”
    so you see, she and Voight were divorced and she lived with Bill Day from 1978 thru 1993, yet expected Voight to pay spousal support? I think I see where Angie gets her irrational thinking.

    http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrities/people/dating/marcheline-bertrand.htm@LatinaLady:

    Reply
  14. DogBlissYou said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    “…fluff of the highest order.” Wow, Ian. Guess no Pulitzer this year.

    Reply
  15. DogBlissYou said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Holy Shit! She actually looks likes a dog!!

    Reply
  16. Sarah said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    http://www.petitiononline.com/gts/petition.html

    Reply
  17. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    Well we did hear a tail (lol) about her loving a dog.
    Wonder why she made such a public issue of bringing a lawsuit against NOTW over printing she and Brad consulted with an attorney about legal separation details, YET, she said not one world about the housekeeper’s story to papers about Angie meeting up with a coach in NYC at the Waldorf-Astoria and using black rubber sheets, leaving the room a disaster with drowned bathroom, and sex toys still on the rubber sheets? Guess that’s too tame for Angie Ho
    So much has been revealed over the past five years that all I can think is And Brad Left Jen For THIS? Oh mama Pitt, you guys sure made a mistake in how you raised that boy!@DogBlissYou:

    Reply
  18. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    @LatinaLady:
    awesome thanks!! Who does that???? I have been around death and dying my entire life and not once have I ever experienced someone bitter like that…that woman is just not normal, hence the immoral children…

    Reply
  19. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    yes, those kids are def different than the ones in hats on the gondola’s! Are these nutcases really thinking they are fooling the public??

    Reply
  20. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Patty Anne why don’t you put all those pics together and ask Ian to post them for comment? Sounds like it would make a good talking point…

    Reply
  21. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:33 pm

    That photo was taken when Angelina was supposedly 28 or 29 years old. Looks quite old for that age doesn’t she?

    SO, do they have a new version of Knox now? Who on earth are all these children?

    Reply
  22. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    that baby is def NOT Knox!! No way in Hell!!

    Reply
  23. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    interesting article! I am now believing what Keane has said about Angelina being older…she had to be born soon after they got together and that def was 40 years ago….no wonder she needs all that plastic surgery…

    Reply
  24. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    @Emerson:

    Well, this one looks more like Brad and Angelina than the last one did but who is it and who was the other one?

    And can I just say, what in hell is all this ridiculous posing on the balcony nonsense about? She looks like she is standing on the stage in a student production of Romeo and Juliet and carrying out her props/children. I mean what was the point of this little promenade supposed to be? She is literally just coming out on to the balcony, showing a child to the cameras, getting their picture taken and then walking back in again, without any motivation whatsoever. It is like she has now even given up on pretending that there is any motivation for the photo opps like “getting an ice cream” or “going to the museum”, she is literally just standing there, holding a child, looking directly at the camera and waiting to get her picture taken. It is bizarre isn’t it? I am finding it utterly bonkers – it is like she is just going through the motions and has given up even trying to pretend that this is natural behaviour. Bloody mental.

    Reply
  25. joanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Thank you. I thought I was getting crazier, I thought they looked different. Why are the kids always eating and looking like they want to be somewhere else when with Jolie?

    Reply
  26. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    AND the thing that flipped me out is why are they both so far apart??? They are looking in different directions, miles apart on the large balcony, two mystery children, and yes, I was waiting for them to dangle the twins over the balcony a la Michael Jackson….there is no sense in that home, none at all…they should have had Pax or Shiloh comee out and climb onto the railing for effect. These two are whackadoodles, total losers! She at least did style her hair to cover her turkey neck per usual…HA

    Reply
  27. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    @mooki:
    God, it looks like Angelina has been on a 7 day heroin drug bender, look at her eyes! What child is the one leaving down? Because no way it’s Viv, it’s a bigger child, and those pics from the gondola’s look entirely different than these children, Knox’s eyes were way heavy in the pics, this family is messed up!

    Reply
  28. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    @Emerson:

    Michael Jackson is exactly what it made me think of too, it has turned into a freakshow. They aren’t even being remotely subtle about parading the children any more, they’re just dragging them out, shoving their mugs in front of the camera and taking them back in again, it’s awful. And why are they doing it on such an insistent basis, day after day after day? We have never seen this much of them before ever, they are literally ramming themselves down our throats. Are they doing it for promotion? Because if they are I think it will be counter-productive, they are losing any small amount of mystery they might have had left. People will be sick of the sight of them. Or are they trying to out-run something that is about to come out about them? Hm….. this is a mystery.

    Reply
  29. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    Okay, I’ll get them together tomorrow some time and send it to Ian.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  30. Pattyanne said on March 24th, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    http://dlisted.com/node/36592
    In referrence to the interviewer asking Brad about his beard, “At the after party in London for the movie Kick-Ass, The Sun claims they spoke to Brad as he smoked on Marlboro Reds and drank a Guinness. They asked him about the infamous puss nest on his chin, and he said, “It’s boredom. No other reason than that.”

    How strange that Brad Pitt who made such a big deal of “wanting a family” on national television during the time he was bumping uglies with AJ and still married to Jen Aniston, is now BORED with a housefull of kiddies? What? The nannies and body guards are raising his children? But that’s HIS job, he whined for a year about wanting children so how can be now be BORED with ANGIE and SIX KIDS??? Because the FIVE NANNIES and bodyguards are raising those kids is why. Once a hotel worker overheard Shiloh calling her nanny “Mommy”. LOL It’s ALL been for show!!! Manipulating the public for fame, and higher box office returns so they can demand huge salaries. What jerks. BTW, anyone else think Shiloh is a mini Angie in the making? I think she’s going to be prettier than mom, and I also think that is why AngieHo is trying to guy her up….she knows she won’t be able to compete. Sad when mom feels this way toward her little girl.

    Reply
  31. Lauren said on March 24th, 2010 at 6:09 pm

    WOW!!!!! Reading the comments on Angie being a psychopath and just thinking about the relationship between her mother and father, I’m realizing that Brangelina is a redux of Angie’s parents, but on a larger scale. Clearly something was wrong with her mother. At the very least, the woman was delusional (Marcheline, the famous french actress?!?!?). Back in his day, Jon was a blond, attractive, talented actor with a pretty-successful career and normal family/upbringing. I mean, the basics are all there. It may just be me, but I definitely see a pattern. The big difference is that Marcia Lynn most likely didn’t have the resources/mental capacity to force it to keep going. Jon, with his career and all, clearly had the upper-hand and got out before he completely lost his sanity. And I just don’t think that Marcia was as crazy as Angie (she was def. not right, though). I just hope it ends there and doesn’t continue on with her children.

    I also agree that Shiloh will probably be naturally prettier than Angelina (if that picture of her in HS is any indication). I just wonder if the difference in their looks (Shiloh’s natural vs. Angie’s plastic) will fully bring to light how much work she’s actually done, and what effect that will have on her image. Especially since Angie is aging horribly, she’ll really start feeling the competition. And there’s no telling what games she’ll play to portray Shiloh as an ungrateful, evil, spoiled child if this all does happen. And that’s assuming Angie will make it around for that long. I agree with you Emerson, when I saw the balcony pictures the first thing I thought was “drug addict!” It’s clear in those photos that she has a MAJOR problem. It’ll probably be explained away as her just being tired from working all day and spending all night with the kids; that’s not just a few nights of missed sleep. Her eyes are completely empty, no emotion whatsoever.

    What was the point??? Bueler? You’re right Keane, those pictures are entirely for publicity benefit. Why would any sane, loving, high-profiled mother want to take her babies out on a balcony in front of God knows how many paps just to have their picture taken? No other activity; just stand in front of the cameras and have your picture taken at different angles. It’s obvious to me that they’re bracing themselves for something huge. They’re starting early, and they’re hitting hard. Something has them shaking so badly, though, that they’re getting sloppy in their work. The quality of the photo ops, the haggard/God awful druggy look, the kids looking unhappy, stories getting about them. This is what they’re truly talented at; Brangelina is where they do their best acting. It’s the role of their lives. And it’s failing them miserably. But they both deserve an Oscar for fooling so many people for as long as they have. Jen deserves a freakin’ Nobel Prize. I should be ashamed of myself for saying this, but I love it. My heart aches for the children, but it’s time that this facade they built starts crumbling. It’s bound to be a bumpy ride.

    Reply
  32. Lauren said on March 24th, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    @Emerson:
    I think it’s Shiloh. Same boyish style of dress, and the tags have Angie, Knox, and Shiloh. I’ll be looking forward to Pattyanne’s collage of Knoxes. I need to have all the pictures there for me to observe. Sadly, all babies look the same to me, barring extreme differences.

    Reply
  33. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 6:45 pm

    @Lauren:

    You’re right the photo opps are becoming increasingly sloppy. The “being left behind trying to juggle three grown children and still make a pretty picture in Florence” photo opp and the “standing on a balcony holding another child they want to make the world believe is their son Knox, one of the non-twins” photo opp have been disastrous. And you’re right they really are “hitting it hard” and for a prolonged time. “Getting their brand out there” as their agent would say. Yep, I would say they are trying to maximise the value of their brand before a big blow falls on it. And I’m thinking it must be coming pretty soon otherwise why would they be doing it at this intensity? I wonder if the blow is Morton’s book?

    Reply
  34. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    By the way, there was an unintentionally hilarious comment by a loon on JJ about that pic of Angelina holding the unidentified child for all to see on the balcony. It said:

    “it just goes to show how little we really know about their private lives, this child looks like a completely different baby”.

    LMAO

    Reply
  35. v said on March 24th, 2010 at 8:46 pm

    What I fail to understand is why the media refuse to call these two morons out on their bull shit? They have no problem calling out britney spears or any other celebrity couple for doing the simplest thing. Say what you what about britney, but when I see pic of her with her kids, they are smiling and happy. Not to mention, she is always interacting with them. They also have no problem calling out TC and KH for every little thing. But, the Brand is off limits? Their media whoring is more obvious than any other celeb but nobody will speak on it. How do these people control the media like this? What will it take? They are not even interesting anymore. Everytime I see a pic of them, they look like they are about to fall asleep just walking. This couple is boring as hell and the media needs to stop shoving them down our throats like they are the best things since slice bread. Enough of the shenanigans already. It is time these two get a little back of what they have been putting out there. And, no, Know is not the same kid.

    Reply
  36. v said on March 24th, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    And, I think if all this stuff about the drugs, fake pregnancy, baby buying, switching kids every photo op turns out to be true, we won’t have to play guessing games about who will come out on top–they both will be done. Maybe, that is why he is walking around looking like a smelly hobo. I think he is beyond worried that the shit is about to hit the fan.

    Reply
  37. lory said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:19 am

    @Pattyanne:

    Well you certainly dont know how he meant this comment and neither do I. Pitt talked in the past about being bored with himself on the screen and with his image in the media. Maybe he is doing it because he knows it pisses everyone off. It certainly seems to keep him off the tabloid covers. That alone should be worth the beard!

    Reply
  38. betty said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:37 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Thanks for the refresher Pattyanne! I read it too & it’s pretty damning,I wonder what her fans would make of it.

    Reply
  39. betty said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:56 am

    I used to believe that Jon Voight was the bad guy,but now I see differently,must be hard for him to counter her defaming him.She really made him seem like a bad guy….. before they reunited that is.

    Reply
  40. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 8:18 am

    @Lauren:
    Her mother was just not RIGHT, paranoid psycho? bi polar? There was something wayyyy off in that family, and it comes from some gene…JV seems pretty normal to me, and I KNOW I keep saying this, but I am OBSESSED with the comment the mother left in her will!!! I just cannot imagine anyone who is sane doing that while they lay dying!!! Those kids on the balcony didn’t even have socks on! Wasn’t it just snowing in Venice a few weeks ago? Who drags out kids for photo ops with no socks? Angie def looks like she has been on a week long bender, and why are directors still hireing her?? She cannot act, she is a nutcase, etc. Brad makes me SICK, he obviouslly cannot man up and deal, who cares what she has on him…we all know he likes men, get out of the closet Brad, man up and be a real father, with children staying in one place so that they can have a stable life such as he did….lock Angie away and be done with it already!

    Reply
  41. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 8:27 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I think Angie looks WAY horrible now, drug use obviouslly showing on her face, Brad’s face looks like he is 75 years old, and I think they are starting to worry big time…ummmm what happened to the lawsuit they filed with NOTW?? Riiiiggghhhhttt, they are “sueing” give me a break. Angie looks haggard and I believe too she is older than 34, no way she is that young! Mystery children with no socks in the middle of winter in Venice…it’s obvious they want to be in Europe where DCS cannot touch them…those poor nannies! I wish one of them would write a tell all! SO, here’s my wish list…a biography on Angie’s nutcase mother, and a book written by the nannies…one can only dream, sigh…

    Reply
  42. Pattyanne said on March 25th, 2010 at 8:45 am

    We could suppose a lot of theories about how Brad meant his statement that “it’s boredom”, but rather than to disect it looking for hidden meaning, I prefer to take it as he said it. Brad Pitt is Bored. Period. Being married to Angie, having six children, a production company, starring in films…..and…..”it’s boredom”. lory, I think it means, Brad Pitt is bored.@lory:

    Reply
  43. Pattyanne said on March 25th, 2010 at 8:51 am

    I don’t think the rabid, die-hard, loons will believe a word of what is printed in Brangelina: The Untold Story, even though a law suit was never considered because Ian published the facts truthfully. They are rather like ostriches, if they deny, it doesn’t exist in their version of reality. There are at least two more tell all books on this pair coming out, one should be out any day now if reports are right, so it’s not going to fade away, but draw more attention to the situation in which six little lives are being raised. No one hates Jolie, in fact I think some pity her. She has tried her best to become what she perceives to be a success, but has gone about it the wrong way, most likely due to her irrational thought process. Brad Pitt is a narcissistic bastArd and diserves the life he’s living, even if I believe all the pitiful photos are part of his plan to escape rather untouched by public outrage, but it’s the children most everyone is concerned about. How this circus is affecting their lives, their future. If one reads the books, reads closely the comments Angie has made on video interviews over the past seven years, they would also be concerned for the “child collection”.@betty:

    Reply
  44. Lizzy said on March 25th, 2010 at 9:15 am

    @Emerson:
    What is the comment in the mother’s will that you are refering to?? I never heard about this… Thanks!

    Reply
  45. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 9:38 am

    @Lizzy:
    go up to Latina lady, she actually found the link for me, but you will have to page down a little and they talk about her will and she wrote in it “Jon Voight owed $180,000 in alimony that he never paid” now that is just my words, hers are better….I remember hearing it right after she died, and I thought, man that woman is a WHACK of the highest order…who does that while dying from cancer? I have watched and taken care of both my parents who died of cancer, and let me tell you, there was nothing negative, any old hurts were forgiven, and there was peace surrounding them both. Anyone who would put this snarky comment in their will is, imo, a nutcase…

    Reply
  46. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 10:08 am

    Wow Fangie looks wasted. I’m really concerned not kidding. The way she’s staring at the paps Whoa! She needs help really. Pits really should be ashamed of himself. At this point he a worse father than K-fed. Who has 5 children with a clearly mentally ill woman in the space of five years. This family needs prayers and I’m not joking. I actually feel sorry for Jolie. I know crazy when I see it, I’ve seen that look before. Really Brad grow some a pair.Does he not get the seriousness of the situation?

    Reply
  47. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Man, I need to edit my posts better!

    Reply
  48. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 10:19 am

    @KramerVs.Kramer:
    I agree completely, her eyes were somewhere else altogether, smudged, not focused, she is def on something, and yep, Brad is just as bad…grows a beard because he’s “bored” uh ha…I was waiting for the child to drop off the balcony…she is mentally ill just like her mother, and needs big time help, locked away, on meds, etc. etc…but afraid that will never happen

    Reply
  49. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 10:35 am

    Druggie Parents. I despise druggie parents. Especially ones who could afford rehab.

    Reply
  50. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 10:41 am

    @KramerVs.Kramer:
    Amen to that, and they keep bringing more and more kids into their drugged out world…

    Reply
  51. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 10:43 am

    You know didn’t people see what just happened to Brittany Murphy? Hmm Brittany Murphy,Winona Ryder,and Angie all in the same film all with the same problem.

    Reply
  52. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 10:52 am

    Johnny and Angie in the same flick! Anybody got a needle?

    Reply
  53. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 11:40 am

    @KramerVs.Kramer:
    please don’t tell me Johnny is a druggie too!! Keane, I can’t help it, I need to believe in someone out there in HW that does not do drugs!!! Someone, please give me one celebrity!!

    Reply
  54. Lizzy said on March 25th, 2010 at 11:40 am

    @Emerson:
    Thank you for the response and I’m sorry to hear about your parents.
    I too can’t believe she would write that in her will! Maybe she feels anger towards him because they didn’t stay together and that would have gauranteed her fame. Just a thought…? You have to wonder if she brainwashed the children in some way because they both seem equally nuts (AJ & JH)

    Reply
  55. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 11:43 am

    @Lizzy:
    Thank you for your condolences, my parents were great, and I was blessed to have been able to be a caretaker…there is just something missing with that woman, brainwashing could def be part of it, plus I wouldn’t be surprised if she pushed the incest as well…something BIG happened in that household to have created 2 total lunatics…as far as I’m concerned…

    Reply
  56. Lizzy said on March 25th, 2010 at 11:49 am

    While I am fascinated by the Brangelina saga like mostly everyone else on this blog, I have just about had enough of Hollywood. Maybe i completely naiive but celebrities are just making me sick, and not so much the celebrities as the “Yes men” and media heads that are behind the scenes. They seem to condone whatever types of behavior a celebrity chooses to engage in no matter who gets hurt (spouses, children, etc.) It is not so much that I care about the choices these celebrities make but it’s the effect that they have on the public and children that I am concerned about. I know this is off topic but considering the recent Tiger Woods and Jesse James scandals it’s just completely shattering to hear that so many women were quick to sleep with a married man for a few $$’s and minutes of fame. Did they once have a thought towards the families that they were going to be breaking up? It sends a terrible message to insecure women around the country that if they sleep with a married celebrity they too can become famous. It’s SICK! Morals seem to be a thing of the past and I can only hope this trend ends soon.

    Anyways, back on the topic at hand, and why I thought of this in the first place is that if Angelina and Brad truly are the way we all think they are – Why hasn’t anyone exposed them? What is there to gain from keeping the secrets? Why is no one calling these people out on their true character? What is the consequence? …So they have a lot of money but if the media turns against them then it won’t matter. I’m just so sick of this moral-less society and I have a feeling that the worst of it is still going on behind the scenes.

    Reply
  57. Brad Pitts said on March 25th, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    That pic is funny! do you think Brads contemplating suicide or will he kill Angie? Looks like fun either way!

    Reply
  58. Jenny L said on March 25th, 2010 at 12:16 pm

    They hate each other that photo confirms it!

    Reply
  59. Tita said on March 25th, 2010 at 12:44 pm

    Is this blog still alive?..wooooooaaaaaahhhhh!!!

    Brad and Angelina are till Together…How?…According this blog They broke up a long time ago!!!. Who are your sources buddy?…I am sure your worst enemies!!!.

    Reply
  60. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    Hmm let’s see, Depp used to date Winona and Kate Moss. He admits to liking absinythe -I don’t think I spelled that right-whether he’s on anything now I don’t know. But he’s unbelievably overrated. He plays the same role in every movie a “slightly effiminate weirdo”just with different makeup. It is the same role over and over.Same with Jolie,” I’m a crazy bad-ss chick who loves sex!” yeah,such talent.

    Reply
  61. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    @Tita
    What is it with you fans that you cannot see the obvious? If Tiger Woods is sexually crazy and Sandra bullock is married to a mad man, how is anything Ian has said about the Jolie-Pitts so unbelievable. Maybe their fans are just complete morons.

    Reply
  62. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    @Lizzy:
    I agree 100%! The part I cannot understand is all these skanky women coming forth saying that Tiger or Jesse did not use condoms…WTF?? Are they not afraid of std’s?? I jus do not get it at ALL!! They are only after their own pleasure without concern for their children….Jesse’s little girl with minimal visits from her birth mother, a strong attachment to Sandra, and Jesse messes with that? That child is going to be broken hearted, and for what? Sex with skanks? Jesse grosses me out as well and Brad and Angelina….I would LOVE for a PI to actually do some digging and find out just what is going on with these freaks…ie drugs, abuse, etc..

    Reply
  63. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    @Tita:
    seriouslly, Angelina will separate on her time, since she is such a control freak! Ask yourself why there were no lawsuits in regards to Ian’s book??? Could it possibly be that the contents are true? Wow! AND what is up with the lawsuit against NOTW??? That went “poof” and disappeared as well! Brad is a mess, Angie is a mess, and the whole think just reaks…

    Reply
  64. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    @Emerson
    If the tabs are willing to after a John Edwards and his cancer-striken wife during a presidential campaign, take down Beloved Billionaire Golfer Tiger Woods and his perfect little family at the absolute height of his career, and destroy and humiliate America’s sweetheart Bullock ,11 days after winning an Oscar after making Hollywood tons of money this year, how long can it be before Brangie gets taken to the dumpster?

    Reply
  65. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    @KramerVs.Kramer:
    that’s what I just do not understand! Come on, they bring down John Edwards et al and no one can get anything on Brangie?? It just doesn’t seem right, especially when there are children involved as was the caase in the Edwards/Tiger/Bullock affairs…it just seems like they ignore this mess, and I want to know why!

    Reply
  66. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    I meant to say “go after” in my previous post.

    Reply
  67. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Maybe that’s why they’re so worried? Flames have started to lick at their boots.

    Reply
  68. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    Wait a second that baby is Vivienne not Knox according to Daily Mail. This kids look like different kids.What the ___ is going on here? LOL!

    Reply
  69. Lauren said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    Don’t tell me Keane, “Tita”= “Lory”/”Mia” and/or “guest123″? I think I’m catching on.

    As for why the media won’t take them down, the only thing I can think of is that destroying the John Edwards, Tiger, and Jesse ultimately brought in more money for Hollywood/the media than what they would have made by not busting them up. Maybe it also has to do with politics. Perhaps they wanted to bring Edwards down so that Obama could be elected because they thought it would be easier to get him in their pockets? I mean, all of the Hollywood liberals went for him over Edwards and that wasn’t exactly the case for the general population. Once Edwards dropped out, it may have been easier to influence the general population’s decision. Also, Brangelina def. does have some shady political ties around the world, and this adds to their brand being so lucrative. Then again, all this is me just attempting to rationalize something about Brangelina. I don’t that can be done successfully.

    Reply
  70. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    @KramerVs.Kramer:
    I think no one was pregnant, and they pick up random children to flash before the paps..LOL, jk, but please Angie put socks on your babies, or whoever your babies are and quick the heroin or methodone or whatever she is on….good God…the twins look nothing alike and while they can be “fraternal” it just seems soooo not right!

    Reply
  71. Pattyanne said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    You said it precisely! In those balcony photos it was obvious that Angie was higher than a kite in a March wind! She was posing, but not all there if you get my meaning. I’d have been afraid to have her hold a toddler on that balcony in that condition! And poor Shiloh bare legged kneeling down in front of Angie, with bruise upon bruise on her bare legs. At this point it’s clearly up to Brad to take control and insure the safety of his children AND his Ho, or he’s neglecting her moral obligations.@KramerVs.Kramer:

    Reply
  72. alif said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    Back in the day, the studio heads would control much of their employees’ behaviours. Some did abuse their authority, but their stars would have to show credit to the business called “show” or else be banned from the industry.

    To those of us who researched earlier hollywood; we discovered that many similarities with current stars’ behaviours happened. It was then up to the studio heads to cover their big names’ as–s with the best lawyers available. There seems to be little to no restrictions today.

    We learned that murders were committed; sometimes by top names in the industry. Cover-ups were big in those days, just like now. Now, it seems to have happened to protect society as well as the boxoffice receipts.
    A historical murder that particularly fascinated me, as well as anyone, was that of William Desmond Taylor, a suave, handsome director in the early 1920’s. The cover-ups that ensued makes for an enthralling read

    Society desperately needs good forces to at least balance the bad. It seems that the Brangeloonies, and the cyberloonies have the upper hand in the business. The good people in the industry are all but silenced. There have been a few voices of industry veterans in mild protest against the new celebs; but they have been largely ignored by the larger media.
    I think that’s the reason we have so many new blogs which cater to the above loonies; so they can become more of a force to be reckoned with by the timid stars, of whatever. And make a lot of money in the interim.

    Reply
  73. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    Ok The Daily Mail is saying the baby we think is Vivienne = Knox and that the baby we think is Knox is Vivienne. They do make mistakes on the website quite often though so maybe this is just another one:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1260632/Angelina-Jolie-shows-bambini-sights-Venice.html

    How odd though. Also I love how in the pic in which Angelina is venturing to kiss said child, whoever it is looks distinctly underwhelmed by it all!

    Reply
  74. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Knox looks like Shiloh in these pics i.e. like Angelina. Viv looks more different to me.

    Reply
  75. Emerson said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    One of my fav online places, and I still cannot imagine them being twins…idk, they look way different, God only knows whose wombs they came from, lol…I wonder if she finally put socks on them?

    Reply
  76. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    @Emerson:

    Really? I am working there tomorrow! Not sure which department though, could be something boring.

    Reply
  77. Tita said on March 25th, 2010 at 6:08 pm

    @Lauren:

    This website is full of crazy people like Ian Halperin with the most insane arguments about Brad and Angelina Kids. Ian lost the war against them. The world is at Brangelina’s feet looking every day beautiful pics about the family.

    There are just three websites like this posting stupid things about them. The traffic is very bad here, all the time the same people is posting crazy arguments.

    The tabloids changed the subject about this couple and you are still dreaming with the breakup.

    One question Ian: Is Angelina’s brother your insider or any relative of her?….WOOOOAAAAOOOOHHHH

    Reply
  78. Sarah said on March 25th, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    @Kate:

    Yeah, we´re curious. :P Poor Angie lol.

    And talking about the documentary, Ian don´t you dare give it up just because mad fans are trying boycott it. I read in the news that Jackson family are aware of the documentary so if they really know about it and showed no concern I think you should go ahead.

    Actually the fans are supporting the three Michael´s bodyguards which revealed that Michael had at least two girlfriends. They said nice things, everything that fans like to hear. But Ian be careful, they have now a facebook page and they called you a idiot…

    http://www.facebook.com/MJBodyguard?ref=ts

    But I suspect they only say it just to please the fans. I think the story about the girlfriends somewhat strange, because Michael was a very private person and I believe he never be able to make out in the back seat of the limousine near the bodyguards, even if they were separated by a blanket. And other stories are strange too. But they seem care about his kids and himself.

    Reply
  79. Lauren said on March 25th, 2010 at 6:33 pm

    @Tita:
    For future reference, don’t address me like you know me. But since you did anyway, please know this about me: I don’t give two sh*ts and three f*cks about Brangelina in my real life. Not until I come on this website (mostly to procrastinate from doing work by reading and responding to comments) do I even think about them. I don’t sit and dream about them, whether they’re together or not, or their children. I don’t have some fantasy world built around them. Unlike you, they aren’t the center of my life. See, I actually have a life. I have things to do, including spending time with people who know me in real life and who return my love for them. Brangelina doesn’t know you, and they don’t know you. In fact, they don’t give two sh*ts and three f*cks about you. That may be the one thing that I have in common with those two.

    If you don’t appreciate the website, Ian, or the conversations here, by all means don’t show up. No one is forcing you to come here. If the website is so insignificant, no one’s listening to us or Ian, and the traffic is horrible, then why are we even on your radar? Honestly, why do you care so much to take the time out of your day to mingle with people you don’t know and never will, and who have such unwaveringly different opinions as you on this subject? You’re more than welcome to go wallow in mania with the rest of your lot. Clearly, two things are certain about your kind: 1) You are loony. 2) You are quite the unintelligent bunch.

    Incidentally, you’re also dismissed.

    Ps.- As much as you hate Ian, you continue to supply him with hits! I thank you on his behalf.

    Pss.- I’ve noticed that your breed always challenge Ian’s claims (which are well researched), yet you never seem to be able to provide any facts. Hmmm???

    Pss.- Now, you’re truly dismissed. Thanks for reading.

    Reply
  80. Sarah said on March 25th, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    @Lauren:

    True, most people say that they hate Ian but can´t stop talking about him.

    Reply
  81. Tita said on March 25th, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    I don’t hate Ian I hate the liers.

    Here for you Losers:

    Lovely pics of mom and son….Too much cute!!!

    http://www.popsugar.com/Photos-Angelina-Jolie-7897024

    Reply
  82. Chris said on March 25th, 2010 at 7:30 pm

    Hey Angelina – nice try. The pictures of the hag and slag are a joke – they are whoring their “children” and their gig is up. They are going down together in flames. Bored Brad and the hag…bye bye!

    Reply
  83. newbie said on March 25th, 2010 at 8:39 pm

    I posted here a couple of weeks ago, but haven’t come up yet with a name to use, so I’m still posting as newbie.

    First, a couple of comments to Tita. I have not read Ian’s book (yet), but I do recall in interviews he said that Brangelina wouldn’t break up for another year or more. Maybe the informed posters on this site can clarify this. Also, I have to laugh at your comment that “The world is at Brangelina’s feet looking every day beautiful pics about the family.” Angelina looks anorexic, and Brad looks like a homeless man. Yes, their happiness is really showing, NOT. Why don’t you check back in 6-12 months.

    Now for the real reason for my post. I wanted to share the following article I found at Huffington Post. It is kind of long, and I could have done without the comment from Dr. Judith Kuppersmith, but I think you will find this interesting:

    I Am Other Woman; Hear Me Roar

    From Michelle “Bombshell” McGee to John Edwards’ baby-momma, not to mention the 16 and counting Tiger Woods’ mistresses, the “other woman” is getting a lot of press these days. It kind of makes me wonder, when did being an adulterer become en vogue? And each time another “other woman” comes forward, her tell-all gets a bit more sordid than the last, told without regard for the woman suffering betrayal not only from the liaison in question, but from its being made public. I’m not so naïve to think that all women have the inclination to form a sisterhood against patriarchy, or that patriarchy is an evil institution that affects only women. And true, there’s no glass ceiling for self-opportunism. Still, the confessions (albeit for money and fame) of these “other women” strike me as an especially mean-spirited brand of girl-on-girl misogyny.

    Relationships are complicated, and each encounter we have with another is something unique. As long as we’re human, there’s no absolute way to qualify the types of relationships we forge. We’ll also probably always have the urge to judge our own and others’ entanglements. That said, a woman who knowingly sleeps with someone else’s husband or partner and then has the urge to “come forward” like she’s unearthed some hidden treasure leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I’m not suggesting we brand these women with scarlet A’s, and I’m not forgetting the adulterous man in the equation, neither the media outlets that dole out dollars for salacious stories, nor the public that consumes them. In this way, blame is really useless. But back to the confessional “other woman.” Something besides gold-digging and fame-seeking is at play – namely the “other woman’s” warped sense of entitlement. She feels entitled to speak, and that’s somewhat interesting. As the “other woman,” she represents a wanton rebel, a direct threat to the sanctity of the American family. Yet as the “other,” her position in the love triangle is secondary, and many would argue there’s some void in her self-esteem that leads her to seek intimacy with someone not fully available. But with a very public tell-all, she has her chance to stake her claim.

    Psychologist, professor and Second Wave Feminist, Dr. Judith Kuppersmith explains:

    “Men are still born into this world as the number one sex, and as such, they have automatic power and move into the and through our social environment. They don’t have to speak – they just have to take action – to move and push things out of their paths. Women, born the second sex, have to earn any kind of power they may want, and because they are born with less muscle and physical power, they attend to the ‘other’ in the social environment. It’s also true that the little girl speaks earlier than the little boy and girls are encouraged to develop their social speaking as a power and control mechanism.”

    So by speaking, the “other woman” finds her footing, and earns power by confessing dirty little secrets.

    Jennifer Aniston got a lot of flak for calling Angelina Jolie’s Vogue confessional about falling in love with her husband, “Uncool.” If a public flogging is what the people want, shouldn’t we reevaluate who goes to the gallows? In the meantime, “other women” should stop being such haters.

    Reply
  84. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 11:02 pm

    What a crock of sh-t! I get so tired of these defenses of these classless b-tches. Why do they come forward,why do they brag,because they are trashy whores. How crazy are these tiger wood hos who actually think they deserve a public apology like his wife got.INSANE. When did this behavior become popular,when the media turned Angie into a saint,when they Paris and Kim Kardashian into stars for letting themselves get screwed on the net.People have no shame anymore.

    Reply
  85. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 25th, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    Look at Sarah Palin. She’s making millions of dollars for being a complete moron,a shitty govenor, and crappy mother. That’s all she is,she has done nothing of real value and she will written about in the history books. Compare this trick to Harriet Tubman, Susan B. Anthony,Rosa Parks, I mean honestly she has done nothing.

    Reply
  86. alif said on March 26th, 2010 at 12:48 am

    @KramerVs.Kramer:@KramerVs.Kramer:
    The worst is yet to come! She has a contract to do a reality show called “Sarah Palin’s Alaska”. This is complete arrogance on her part, and complete stupidity on the cable nework bosses’ part!

    Alaska is like a separate country! People in one part of the state are different from another. There is segregation and racial separatism imbedded there; more so, since statehood.
    She doesn’t have the brain power to address the numerous issues that divide the people; esp. the natives and the newcomers, many from the deep southern areas of the United States.
    Here’s one example: When Obama won the democratic primary over Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin happened to dine at a New York restaurant with other republicans.
    When Palin learned of Obama’s victory, a waitress overheard her saying to her colleagues: “So, Sambo won over the bitch?”
    Her party laughed!
    Also, two radio talk show hosts moved to Anchorage from San Diego, California. Listeners heard them using perverted language as they mused about how to become an Alaskan. Their perverted sense of humor denigrated Alaskan native womanhood, using sexual perversion as the basis for their humor. I believe they got a two week suspension for this. You remember, an east coast commentator made some racial remarks about a black female sports team and the resultant outrage cost him his job.
    To my knowledge, no republicans were outraged. Certainly the then governor, Sarah Palin didn’t speak up about the original inhabitants of Alaska’s right to freedom from harrassment!
    A mexican who knew I was originally from Alaska, was puzzled as to the mild reaction to what he considered a clear-cut outrage! He opined that the radio hosts were lucky they picked on a small segment of the population.

    Should the democrats lose their advantage, as they have so often done in the past, Sarah Palin may become the republican party standard bearer. But, imo, they should wait until she’s actually nominated. Otherwise, they’ll have to deal with Mick Romney, who would be a more formidable candidate.

    Sarah Palin is using religion to construct her power base. And she’s adept at manipulating her female followers. In additon, she will use her reality show to boost her image; one can see it coming!

    Reply
  87. KramerVs.Kramer said on March 26th, 2010 at 7:01 am

    No one is going to elect S. Palin because she is not running for president. She keeps throwing that out there to keep her namd in the press. If she does run it’s only to help YO-MAMA to get re-elected just like her being picked for vp was on purpose because if MICKRAGE had picked a regular midly intelligent,somewhat experienced white guy he would have easily won.Behind closed doors there is no such thing as demoCraps or Repugnantpigs.It’s just about money.They use wedge issues to keep people divided,

    Reply
  88. lurkeyloo said on March 26th, 2010 at 8:46 am

    I agree….however, we (as a society) need to stop perpetuating these classless individuals into stardom by these types of actions. The public’s “demand” for these sensational types of stories is what drives people with zero self-esteem and morals to behave this way. (I am guilty, as charged, because I am addicted to this site and love to read the opinions about The “Brand”) This type of behavior has become rewarding because the public REWARDS this type of behavior. @KramerVs.Kramer:

    Reply
  89. Lizzy said on March 26th, 2010 at 8:57 am

    @KramerVs.Kramer:
    Couldn’t have said it better myself. It is true, Angelina getting away with being a homewrecker has definitely put a new spin on morals. Look what happened to her – there is a huge Brangelina following and the wife (jen) is portrayed as lonely and desperate – even deserving of her ex-husbands behavior. It’s disgusting. Probably immature but I find it sometimes hard to put in perspective that these people are celebrities and this behavior is not going on in “normal” life to this degree (hopefully). It makes me so angry that these people are making me lose faith in relationships.

    Reply
  90. Lizzy said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:04 am

    @lurkeyloo:
    I agree with you to an extent. I think the public rewards this type of behavior with attention however what these “other women” fail to realize is that it’s negative attention. Thanks to “celebrities” like Lindsay Lohan and Speidi, any attention is looked upon as positive. But never will these people be able to get a respectable job – they are forever going to be tied to paid public appearances and a one night stand. Who would want to settle down with one of these women? Or hire them?

    I think instead the blame should be placed on the media outlets that keep shoving these women down our throats. In the example of Jesse James/Sandra Bullock I think I speak for many saying that I don’t want to see photos of the other women or hear stories about her past life and what bills she can’t pay, etc. I would like to hear how the actual celebrities are coping with the situation and if a divorce is going to happen. Media outlets are rewarding these girls thinking there is an actual demand for the girls themselves and not just their short story of interaction with a celebrity. No one actually cares about who these girls are.

    Reply
  91. Pattyanne said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:20 am

    Bravo~!!!!@Lizzy:

    Reply
  92. lurkeyloo said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:03 am

    Well said! I guess part of my point was that the “reward” these “people” are getting is the attention (whether negative or positive) they are seeking. It all relates to the fact that, generally speaking, these fame whores have low self esteem and no moral code whatsoever. Any attention, in their view, is good attention. While the media does shove it down our throats…it is “us” as a society that has created a demand to these types of stories. Granted, once their 15 minutes are up…they are up…but they ARE getting rewarded “instant gratification” style….they are lavished with the attention and money they seek…however fleeting, or negative, it may be. @Lizzy:

    Reply
  93. Lizzy said on March 26th, 2010 at 10:30 am

    @lurkeyloo:
    Absolutely.

    “People” — Love it!

    Reply
  94. Emerson said on March 26th, 2010 at 11:26 am

    @Tita:
    seriouslly, did you see Angie’s eyes??? They weren’t tired bag eyes…you seem quite naive. Here’s a suggestion, why don’t you read Perez Hiltons blog as he is VERY Brangie friendly, and you won’t have to get your panties in a twist…..enjoy his posts dear!

    Reply
  95. alif said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    @KramerVs.Kramer:
    She is indeed running for President, imo! Everything is being set in place. Her show which will further her image as a “true christian’” “all-american” “womens’ role model” etc! etc! etc!

    Mc Cain was/is an angry man. Who can blame him? But it was reported that he later ignored the Viet who saved his life. This may have been consequentially resolved, however. IDK!
    His choice of Sarah Palin as vp was not masterful. It made those of us who are of neither party realize he is not presidential material. We thought of the oft-repeated “One Heartbeat Away from the Presidency” saying.

    Obama has been crucified by the right wing! But he is firmly in the corner of the “have nots”. This is why Lincoln, Kennedy, et al, gave their lives; i.e. their belief that America is for everyone!
    My opinion as of now, is that he has made his mark. He, imo, will be a one-term president. I dearly hope I”m wrong; but his party has two albatrosses around its neck: Abortion and Gay Marriage.
    And here’s why: There are millions of silent voters out there (minority men and women; christians, etc!) who will only speak up at the ballot box. They are firmly in the corner of their churchs’ stance on these issues. And, esp. the minorities, are never publicized re: their views on those two issues.
    This stance will be exploited, again and again by the Palin fanatics!

    JMO!

    Reply
  96. alif said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    @alif:
    To add to the above: She will run as a figurehead. This is why her image must sell.
    Someone else will run the show behind the scenes. As various figures did for Bush.

    Reply
  97. sid said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    @Emerson:
    Did you see the new balcony pictures? The twins seem very interactive and responsive to me. Viv actually cried when pulled away from angie and knox looks anything but “somber” and “sad”.
    I believe many things Ian states on this site but sometimes, some of the things you guys say just don’t make sense and seem a little overboard. Sorry if this offends anybody but that’s just my observation.
    I despise Brangelina as much as the next person but i don’t think she’s a bad mother. I really do think she loves all those children. Does she give them due attention though… well i’m not too sure about that.

    Reply
  98. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    OK PEOPLE NEWSFLASH – ANGELINA IS PIMPING THE KIDS OUT ON THE BALCONY WITH A NANNY HOLDING THE OTHER ONE. SHE HAS BEEN STOOD ON THAT BALCONY HOLDING ONE OF THOSE TWINS FOR THREE DAYS. BRAD CLEARLY IS NOT CO-OPERATING ANY MORE SO SHE HAS TAKEN THE DRASTIC STEP OF SHOWING IN PUBLIC ONE OF THE MANY PAID MEMBERS OF STAFF IN ORDER TO GET HER PHOTO OPP. SHE LOOKS SHATTERED AND HAGGARD AND HER EYES ARE LIKE SLITS. DO WE THINK BRAD HAS BAILED ON HER? WHY IS SHE STANDING ON THE BALCONY WITH THOSE TWINS DAY AFTER DAY AS IF HER LIFE DEPENDS ON IT? I AM TELLING YOU EITHER SOMETHING VERY BAD IS ABOUT TO COME OUT ABOUT THEM (LET’S WATCH THE N.E. ETC AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS) OR THE JIG IS UP. POOR BABIES, THEY ARE SO BEAUTIFUL, THEY DO NOT NEED TO BE PART OF THIS RIDICULOUS SPECTACLE. SO SAD.

    Reply
  99. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    @sid:

    Sid in all seriousness I just saw those pics and I’m not certain whether she is reaching for Angelina or whether she is reaching for Knox. Knox looks animated yes, but not that connected to his mother. Vivienne just looks sad. And this photo opp looks, well, about as staged and as rehearsed as they come. JMO

    Reply
  100. stinky-inky said on March 26th, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:The shots I saw she looked strung-out. Could be from lack of sleep, but I don’t know. Almost as if she’s trying to out do Michael Jackson on the crazy meter. And actually succeeding.

    A pathetic cry for help.

    Reply
  101. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 26th, 2010 at 8:24 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    It was very bizarre, she came out in her dressing gown but had had her hair and “natural” make-up done for the photo opp. She obviously knows full well the paps are there so she is deliberately coming out to show herself in a state of undress to the whole world. Now that is very odd behaviour isn’t it? Especially as her and the nanny walked out on the balcony and back in again so quickly and tried to make it look all natural like. My guess is she wanted the world to see the “twins” together as we were all getting confused on who was who but Brad wouldn’t do it so she had to make the nanny go. The only card left she has to play is the twins with Shiloh. After that, finito.

    Reply
  102. sid said on March 27th, 2010 at 5:45 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I don’t think Viv’s reaching for Knox. Notice how she calms down when back in Angie’s arms? I agree the photo op looks ridiculous, especially when its done 3 times now but somehow i still don’t doubt that she loves her kids. You can still be attached to your babies while using them as photo ops IMO.

    Reply
  103. Tita said on March 27th, 2010 at 6:00 am

    @Emerson:
    I have seen her eyes. She looks very happy. Beautiful to see Viv crying for mommy. What slap on your faces buddies!!!…Brad was at the balcony and if you want to see him again at this place sooner than later you will have him again. Don’t cry when you see him.

    I can see that this is a website devoted to Brangelina’s enemies. Looking at the traffic here, very low, of course, there are not a lot of you. All the time the same people posting crazy arguments.

    I recommend to include a quotation here, something like this: “This website is against Brangelina!. Join the discussion”

    Brangelina Forever. Goodbye Forever!!!. Losers

    Reply
  104. Pattyanne said on March 27th, 2010 at 11:53 am

    http://www.flatrock.org.nz/topics/relationships/assets/angelina_jolie_at_13.jpg

    Another photo of Angelina Jolie Voight PRE-plastic surgeries

    Reply
  105. joanne said on March 27th, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    @Tita:
    I hope you are not from America, but you sound like one, is this how dumbed down we became? Even the treatment given to our President is shameful. You can tell we have a right wing media, build up skanky tatted homewreckers (Jolie and others) and get close to treason against the President of the USA because he is for the lower and middle class. These fanatics sic their gods on those who don’t agree. I would like to see a more honest and less scare tactit media.

    Reply
  106. Because I said so said on March 27th, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    good photo.

    according to chinese face reading, there is something to be said about people’s eyes…she has what is called “floating iris”. According to one source on face reading this is a sign of someone who is unstable, disturbed, not trustworthy and possibly leads to an early demise.

    Reply
  107. pickwick said on March 27th, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I think you’re right that Brad must be digging in his heels a bit. I read in the Enquirer that Brad, who by all accounts is usually very kind to service people, fussed at a waitress when she came back to ask the standard “Is everything al right?”. They switched servers because the girl was so upset and he guessed what happened and came back to apologize to her. I think the question “Is everything alright?” set him off. No, everything is not alright.
    There’s more balcony standing going on on that movie set than in a Shakespearean play. Depp is on the balcony. Angie is on the balcony. The babies are on the balcony. The nanny is on the balcony. Shiloh is on the balcony.
    Balconies and gelato.
    I’ll be glad when this is over. And I’m sure Depp will be, too, since he has slipped a few tidbits into the press “I couldn’t live like that” and “I’m not after Angie. I have a secret sign if she gets too close”
    To which Angie responded via the press that she isn’t after Depp—-oh, much more scandalous—-she is set on Depp’s partner.
    There are lots of twins who aren’t identical, and these two sure seem to look like Brad and Angie. Well, the one definitely .looks like Brad and Shiloh. The other looks like Angie but does resemble Shiloh, I think.
    I think Angie just looks tired on the balcony. She has that aged, depressed look that we all get when our life is just getting away from us. I don’t understand why on earth she is continuing to make so many movies. I certainly understand wanting to work and stay relevant but I don’t understand the almost manic pace of the movies she picks.
    I don’t know a thing about her psychology, but I do think she probably gets manic. Nobody could commit to that many projects and that many children and everything else she’s doing without being more than energetic. It would take manic,, I think. I get the feeling she can’t settle down and relax. Maybe she does and they just don’t sell those photos and poses to the paps.
    Oh, well.
    I do think Brad is grudging at best at this point.

    Reply
  108. pickwick said on March 27th, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    @sid:
    I think this is true, too. Kids can be attached to parents who aren’t very interested. Sometimes they are more sensitive and clinging.
    I was glad to see her do something besides drag one by the arm. Mostly the kids look more bonded to Brad, so it is good to see one who seems bonded to her.
    I wouldn’t be as interested in this celebrity couple if I didn’t worry about those kids. At least they seem to know who she is so that’s good, I guess.

    Reply
  109. Pattyanne said on March 27th, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    With each photo op Jolie does on the balcony, I keep expecting to hear, “I’m ready for my shot Mr. DeMille” a la Gloria Swanson in that great classic, Sunset Strip. I don’t think it ever entered her mind that her plans would not be carried out exactly one day and the stress of trying to hold it all together is showing on her. Her upper arms in those latest balcony photos appear to be no larger than Knox’s leg! The dark circles , the deep lines in her face. I”m glad her father is at last permitted in the lives of the children, hopefully he will be there to assist them when they need a stable adult in their lives which could be sooner rather than later it seems.

    Reply
  110. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    @pickwick:

    Yes I don’t think you can tell too much from that one pic to be honest. Kids can be obtuse, fickle beings (I know I was!). My cousin’s son (who is about the same age as the twins) will only only go to his mum and not to other relatives for example, but the moment his dad is there will only go to him and not her. I think Viv was a bit scared by the boat-fulls of paps outside the window to be honest (and was crying and trying to cower behind Angelina because of it). To me it just looked like the child had been told by Angelina to play along and look happy but she was frightened by it (as a lot of children of that age would be) but knew she was about to upset mom so cried and reached out for her then cowered into her chest. Istill don’t think she look delighted about the situation once she was in Angelina’s arms. Seriously kids cry about things all the time, it can be sparked off by the smallest of things or for no apparent reason. Those kids must be well-coached before they trot them out to cry as infrequently as they do. I think VIv was scared and didn’t want to smile and started crying because she felt under pressure from mommie dearest. JMO

    Reply
  111. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 27th, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    @pickwick:

    I know this balcony business is absolutely ridiculous isn’t it. It is becoming absurd actually. It is like they are all playing the parts of off-duty movie stars hanging with the family in some hokey school play. It is all getting a bit post-modern!

    Reply
  112. Pattyanne said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:40 pm

    http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/angelina-jolie-in-talks-to-play-wicked-godmother-in-sleeping-beauty-2010283

    So! Tim Burton is going to make Disney’s Sleeping Beauty, and according to the report on the above link, they are “in talks” with Angelina Jolie to play the Wicked Fairy Godmother…lmbooo. Well, at least they have her figured out – obviously she’s not suitable for the Beauty who is fast asleep…snicker, snicker.

    Reply
  113. alif said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Will she accept the typecasting? Maybe she smells an oscar nom?

    Reply
  114. Pattyanne said on March 28th, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    LOL, exactly what I was wondering alif. Her star is falling now I believe, and all the press about Tiger Woods and Jesse James is bring back to people’s minds Brad Pitt and his ho. Can’t help but to compare the situations. And as Angie herself has said, “It is what it is”.@alif:

    Reply
  115. Pattyanne said on March 28th, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    TMZ catches Butler With A Butt Grab On Jen in Paris Woooohooooooo

    http://www.tmz.com/2010/03/28/jennifer-aniston-gerard-butler-photo-pictures-butt-grab/

    Reply
  116. Pepitaa said on March 28th, 2010 at 8:59 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    OMG I always thought that she wasn’t carrying twins. I was pregnant with twins and not nearly as skinny as AJ and my belly was HUGE!!! Some days I looked like I was tipping over. Can U provide a link to the picture? I would love to see it. Thanks

    Reply
  117. Pepitaa said on March 28th, 2010 at 9:45 pm

    I can’t believe I just read all the comments here. After looking at the balcony pics AJ looks like her world is crumbling. She has that high look I’ve seen many times when visiting my niece. And she’s a heroin addict. Something’s gotta be going on because I can’t remember any pics of the nannies carrying the kids. I always thought that AJ and BP wanted the world to think that they did it all on their own.

    Reply
  118. Pattyanne said on March 31st, 2010 at 10:38 am

    I must get this week’s issue of In Touch magazine! Angie’s bodyguard TALKS! “(she) heartlessly laughs when the kids cry”, (she) refers to Brad’s family as, “The simple people”, (Angie) still has kinky sex with her ex. (wonder which? JLM or BBT?)….Brad is a dolt for not running out the nearest exit door draging his kids with him…. Notice how suddenly people are telling what they know? Ian broke the barrier with his tell all book Brangelina: The Untold Story, next is Jenny Pauls tell all about Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie The True Story, Morton has a book coming out sometime this year I believe, and now the bodyguards are spilling their guts. It’s going to be getting quite interesting soon.

    Reply
  119. Pattyanne said on March 31st, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    Pepitaa, read this blog thread on the topic of Angie’s Phony Twin Pregnancy complete with photos. These posters should begin a detective agency, they are that good at locating evidence!
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/more-proof-jolie-faked-her-twin-pregnancy-t237316.html@Pepitaa:

    Reply
  120. Jame said on May 4th, 2010 at 2:30 am

    Why all the posts of disbelief as to how Brad could have been lured into a relationship with Jolie? I mean really…..Brad Pitt? Folks, the man is DUMB, DUMB, DUMB. He’s a big dummy. A person like that doesn’t make “rational” decisions. Also, the stoner thing contributes.

    Reply
  121. bridesmaid dresses 2011 said on March 5th, 2011 at 7:10 am

    Spot on with this write-up, I seriously think this page demands far more attention. I’ll probably be repeatedly to read much more, thank you for that information.

    Reply
  122. xykupiro said on March 24th, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    xykupiro…

    Download mp3 with Nick Holder

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Meta