IUC Exclusive: Corey Haim One Of Many Hollywood Stars Addicted to Illegal Prescription Drugs

Posted on March 14th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

corey haimSo sad about the passing of this talented actor. But everyone saw the writing on the wall. Why didn’t anyone step in and save him? (Gather) Why are we seeing so many talented stars fade because of drug addiction? IUC has learned that a powerful Hollywood couple have taken illegal prescription drugs for at least two years. Developing…

  1. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 14th, 2010 at 8:38 am

    Who could this be….?! Lol

    Reply
  2. too curious said on March 14th, 2010 at 8:54 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Hmmm…let me think…

    Reply
  3. joanne said on March 14th, 2010 at 10:10 am

    Prescription drugs companies are out of control. You can go to an emergency room with some complaint and leave with a card of vicodin and a warning to get your drugs elsewhere. People assume the drug their loved one takes is safe because doctors prescribe them. Sucidal thoughts are VERY commom with a lot of drugs, esp if one has a history of depression. I hope he finds the peace he couldn’t find here due to close minded blowhards who are offended by anyone who is not like them. Hollyweird, where they have to many yes people, to much money or has beens.

    Reply
  4. jan/sa said on March 14th, 2010 at 11:11 am

    if ian means a hasbeen powerful hollywood couple i would be able to guess. but now the two i am thinking of are hasbeens and only tabloid fodder. please ian give a hint to this poor 3rd world lady. jmo

    Reply
  5. Tamara said on March 14th, 2010 at 11:15 am

    I think “illegal prescription drugs” is a bit of an oxymoron isn’t it? Nonetheless, I think there’s probably more than one HWood couple over-indulging in the little blue pills…one pill makes you larger/and one pill makes you small/and the ones that mother gives you, don’t do anything at all ….go ask Alice, I think she’ll know….

    Reply
  6. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 14th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    @Tamara:

    Well I guess if they are taking them without a legitimate prescription for it i.e. buying them from a dealer then that would probably make them illegal. At least, selling them would I assume!

    Reply
  7. I'm on the bidet said on March 14th, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    In the case of Corey Haim, according to TMZ he got his hands on prescription drugs at least two ways:
    1) going around to various urgent care facilities to get prescriptions
    2) he may be linked to a drug ring that got prescriptions pads for doctors via identity theft – one would then write a prescription on the pad and take it to a pharmacist

    I don’t know enough about the law to state that #1 is illegal, but obviously theft of prescription pads, and knowingly using such a pad, is illegal. Presumably pharmacists aren’t doing anything illegal by filling prescriptions they receive, but it seems like ethically the should be trying to verify prescriptions for widely abused legal drugs like Vicodin. Doctors and pharmacists probably don’t talk to each other enough to track if a patient has multiple prescriptions.

    http://www.tmz.com/2010/03/13/corey-haim-mom-urgent-care-prescription-judy-coroner/
    http://www.tmz.com/2010/03/12/corey-haim-drug-ring-investigation-pills-prescriptions-attorney-general-jerry-brown-death/

    Other doctors and probably pharmacists are just star-struck, and will make unwarranted prescriptions, e.g. check out the story of a Los Angeles doctor who lost his license for over-prescribing and obtaining legal drugs for Courtney Love and Wynona Ryder:
    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/cletdrugs1.html

    Reply
  8. Pattyanne said on March 14th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    The hard economic times in America have created a new drug dealer; mom & pop, granny down the street, the disabled veteran as there is a huge market for their doctor prescribed meds. Many in the back waters have set up homes as methadone factories as well, some risk it in motels in down town Orlando! With the way our unemployment numbers are raising still, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear of more doing this. When I didnt’ feel I needed the pain meds from my spinal surgery, I took them to the Sheriff’s Office to dispose of them properly. Drugs don’t sovle people’s problems, they simply replace the old problems with newer ones.

    Reply
  9. Kate said on March 14th, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Okay so question then IAN, you are asking why someone is not stepping in and stopping them, but at the same time you are protecting this couple that is doing the same thing. This is why these things happen, because no one wants to be the ONE to point the finger and say…those two people need help..if you someone came to you and said, hey, I know that x and y are locking their kid in a closet every night and not giving them dinner, or daddy is diddling with little precious darling, would you protect that person? If you someone told you that x and y were abusing their grandma, would you protect that person….I don’t think you would because I know you are a compassionate decent person…

    so why are you putting this in a blind..somethings don’t belong in one, and this is one of them, how many more have to die, before bloggers and gossip columnist will quit protecting these people?

    just wondering?

    IAN….

    Cheers, Kate

    Reply
  10. Kate said on March 14th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Well if this is Brange , they must be getting crap drugs, because they obviously are not working for Brad, he looks like a dead man walking. Most people that take these do so operate at their maximum, feel more creative, become a bit more compelled to do something. I am more inclined to think he is just a drunk. He was and Jen too at one time said to be heavily into cocaine. That was back when they were first married, there was a dealer that was busted on the set of Friends, from what I have heard, don’t know the facts though. Remember how skinny he was, both of them. This was reported on years ago, on the internet by another blogger after it happened. There were some people that worked on that set that were on that site all the time that dished on the drugs deals. I remember that because it because a battleground , word of mouth , rumorville, but that stuck to their story.

    Of course he could be mixing the drugs and the booze, very dangerous if he is and all the more reason to spill if that is the case before the next headline is ..Brad Pitt dies of a drug overdose! Serious about that too. Look at him, looks like he has one foot in the grave.

    Now we have someone who claims Brad was married in Las Vegas Dec 26 1992 and later divorced. How many William Bradley Pitt’s are there?

    Anyone verified that yet?

    Reply
  11. Susie said on March 14th, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Yes, Ian. I echo what Kate is saying. If you know things to be a fact, than get the word out and in the hands of the RIGHT people so something can be DONE. Whatever the case SOMEONE needs to build a case against this alleged “powerful Hollywood couple”. I mean , if K-Fed could get the courts involved to get Britney cleaned up and under conservatorship, surely there’s someone out there that could do the same in this other circumstance.

    Reply
  12. joanne said on March 14th, 2010 at 9:09 pm

    @Kate:
    Hollyweird and their enablers, rag mags with information hiding hideous things these people do. Then something happens and everyone wonders why someone else didn’t do something,. anyone who knew anything is just as guilty of abuse or whatever they are hiding Its so sad that one can do ANYTHING they want if they have the bucks to do it. When will people start to care?

    Reply
  13. Karen said on March 14th, 2010 at 11:27 pm

    RIP Corey.
    I wish people would try to deal with their problems another way,Corey Fieldman said Corey was a tourtured
    guy,it’s just so sad that all these people kill themselves with drugs instead of getting the help they need.

    Reply
  14. Ben said on March 15th, 2010 at 12:03 am

    I know someone who chose to kill himself slowly like this,I also know that lots of people are quick to judge drug addicts without knowing the circumstances of their addictions, Life without drugs is just too painful to deal with for some people.It kills me to see this over & over again so so sad,my heart goes out to Corey’s family & friends . I know how it feels to have someone die this way & I have read that his mom has cancer as well ….just too cruel.

    Rest In Peace Corey Haim

    Reply
  15. alif said on March 15th, 2010 at 1:49 am

    Prescription drugs are a distinct danger to non-celebs as well. One has to be very careful about mixing legal drugs with just any other substance.

    Why do they do this to themselves? My view is that they don’t have a spiritual foundation to protect them when the going gets tough; and it’s a tough, tough business. Fierce competition. Always has been!

    Also, drug abusers are tolerated within the industry up to a point.
    Drugs, like anonymous sex, is everywhere! This keeps bloggers of blind items in business. Not you, Ian. You write books, and are visible in other media venues. It’s just that someone like Perez-Hilton makes a lot of money off of the celebs’ bad luck or weaknesses.
    AND, many a celeb has a history of being abused as a child.
    Then too, many are not highly educated; and worse, have no passion to become to exercise their brain.
    JMO!
    Just a week before his death, Corey Haim was approached for a reality show about rehab. He was outraged that they’d even consider him for such a show.

    Reply
  16. alif said on March 15th, 2010 at 1:51 am

    Sorry about the error in the fourth to last sentence. Please elim ” to become” .

    Reply
  17. Henny said on March 15th, 2010 at 2:58 am

    Was it Corey Haim who said something about MJ ? I remember an 80’s child star saying somrething about MJ behaving inapropriately with him or something,does anyone know?

    Reply
  18. Cara said on March 15th, 2010 at 3:07 am

    @alif:
    Thats true about the abuse I just googled Corey Haim & it says both he & Corey fieldman have told that they were sexually abused.Corey Fieldman said it was not Michael Jackson.

    Reply
  19. alif said on March 15th, 2010 at 3:10 am

    @alif:
    Drugs are everywhere! Even read that Wasilla, is the meth capitol of Alaska! It was reported because Sarah Palin is from there.
    I’ve been to Wasilla when it was a quiet place.
    You readers may not be knowledgeable about Alaska, before and after statehood. Many people are sorry about statehood. They hope Puerto Rico will learn from the Alaska experience.

    Reply
  20. Bettina said on March 15th, 2010 at 3:10 am

    My friend an I had a crush on Corey when we were kids about 10 years ago we would watch lost boys religiously.

    Reply
  21. Bettina said on March 15th, 2010 at 3:14 am

    I hope the Oscars remember Corey Haim next year & don’t diss him like they did to Farrah.

    Reply
  22. elsdoncaud said on March 15th, 2010 at 4:42 am

    iphone apple contributed particularly controls major [url=http://www.dailytargum.com]ruddiman mitigating didn[/url] http://www.wtliving.com

    Reply
  23. kelsacoutu said on March 15th, 2010 at 4:48 am

    dioxide confirmation article governments douglass include simulate serious

    Reply
  24. guest123 said on March 15th, 2010 at 9:10 am

    @Kate:
    if he thought he could milk hits out of it Kate, then he wouldn’t say a word on any of it….unless there was a story in it for him

    Reply
  25. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 15th, 2010 at 10:21 am

    @guest123:

    Hi Mia – you still haven’t answered my question – would you mind rectifying that? It’s unlike you to run away like a yellow-livered coward… Lol

    Reply
  26. lisap515 said on March 15th, 2010 at 11:12 am

    @Pattyanne:
    i just flush any prescription meds i no longer need/use and shred the lables on the bottles before tossing! I feel bad for Corey though and may he R.I.P.

    Reply
  27. Kate said on March 15th, 2010 at 12:04 pm

    @guest123:
    I don’t believe that because I know IAN, and he has a very compassionate heart. Sometimes IAN is quick to judge someone or a situation, but he also will not hesitate admitting when that judgment was wrong base on incorrect facts.

    This website does not make money IAN, and he does not put these stories up for that reason, he puts them up to 1, keep up happy, 2, to share his opinion on something and voice it, 3 possibly share advertise something he has tried or stayed at , that is part of using the site to sell books. There are many authors , journalists that do this, google how to utilize a blog. lol Not difficult.

    We all know that when he is busy on something else he will put a story up to refresh the blog so we have something to keep talking about. IAN is not sitting in his apartment staring at the blog,reading our comments for heaven’s sake, he have other projects he is working on. Unlike Perez, IAN is writing this blog, Perez now has a staff to throw all that inaccurate crap up, and apparently no fact checkers either.

    So while I appreciate your comment, and we do not all have to agree ( and yes we do get annoyed at times with some of the entries that IAN puts up too, we are human) this entry was simply a quick comment about his death and what continues to be problem.

    As I said, I do wish IAN would turn them in, not necessarily on here, but to the authorities. Their families , someone. I know he did try to do that with Michael.

    Nothing else to really say on this topic for me. :) Hope all are well!

    Reply
  28. Kate said on March 15th, 2010 at 12:07 pm

    excuse the typos, in and out, not much time.:)

    Reply
  29. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 15th, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    @guest123:

    Just remember you are giving him all the hits he needs Mia by your addiction to this site. When you are posting you are driving up hits by inciting people to argue with you. When you are running away from the argument like a frightened little bunny rabbit because you have made another huge boo boo you still lurk here and make the occasional post under a different username so you are still giving Ian hits. Exactly what you claim is all Ian cares about. So tell me, Mia, why do you keep giving it to him? And FF too as we all know you post over there, the syntax is identical. Seems like you are shooting yourself in the foot every time you click on these sites, and yet you just can’t quit us can you? Ha ha.

    Reply
  30. lory said on March 15th, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I doubt that the sytax is identical since guest123 is not me freak!

    Reply
  31. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 15th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes have announced their separation. Looks like that lesbian chick wasn’t the only thing Kate and Angelina were sharing – they both have the same divorce lawyer (Schillings)! I think we now know why Kate was sucking up to Angie in the media, there was obviously a bit of behind the scenes dealing going on there. Well that and the inevitable knock to Winslet’s clout in HW that will come with the loss of her Director partner of course. Don’t be fooled by Winslet’s “I’m so down to earth I ate sausage and mash at my wedding” crap, she is as ambitious, pretentious and phony as any HW ho out there. A good friend of mine at college and her BF had a close connection with her and they both hated her guts and used to rip the piss out of her remorselessly. It will be interesting to see what she does career-wise and personal life-wise now…

    Reply
  32. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 15th, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    Ok now ladies help me out here, I am in need of entertainment. I am in the midst of the first powercut I’ve ever experienced in london (in 8 years) with only my mp3 player and my bb for entertainment, can we have a conversation? Ok I’ll start us off: I think that photo of Angelina in Florence struggling to cope with her 3 adopted kids while Brad walked on miles ahead cooly carrying their bio was just about the funniest pic I’ve ever seen of her (other than her c*ntface at Anne Hathaway and the newly single – probably – Kate Winslet forgetting her name at which ever ceremony it was), Brad made her look like a rejected, incapable idiot. Discuss.

    Reply
  33. Susie said on March 15th, 2010 at 6:36 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    I took note of that also. Could I be reading too much into it? Possibly. But it struck me as Brad being protective of Shiloh – shielding her from the paps, and protecting her from Angelina. Poor little Shiloh…what a precious little girl.

    Reply
  34. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 8:00 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    This is the pics that I thought Angie looked umm GROSS on! She looks like she was walking like a man, which I’m sure she liked, but man, the clothes, the hair, trying to hold Zahara while Brad walked a mile in front of her, it all just cracked me up!! She looked a little desparate, a lot fug, and overall quite pitiful! Do tell all the Kate Winslet goss, I have never heard any about her! PS not sure Mia/Lory/Guest 123 will understand syntax..

    Reply
  35. guest123 said on March 16th, 2010 at 10:21 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    not Mia …keane dear…..someone much closer to you than that

    Reply
  36. Pattyanne said on March 16th, 2010 at 11:30 am

    LOL, sounds like you have a crush on our girl. Why not come out in the open and state your case? No need to be shy yano, Keane’s a fair girl, and she won’t put you down for lusting after her I’m sure.@guest123:

    Reply
  37. Pattyanne said on March 16th, 2010 at 11:31 am

    Wonder how the fog is in San Fran these days?

    Reply
  38. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 11:38 am

    @Pattyanne:
    today has just gotten much more interesting ;)

    Reply
  39. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 16th, 2010 at 11:48 am

    @guest123:

    What like my next door neighbour? I wouldn’t describe any of the people commenting on this board as “close” to me mia, we are all separated by a pretty decently-sized Atlantic ocean and we have all never met. For any of us to describe the other as “close” to us would be a bit of a stretch, and that would most definitely include you!

    Reply
  40. Sue Ellen 5150 said on March 16th, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    @Tamara:
    Ritalin

    Reply
  41. I'm on the bidet said on March 16th, 2010 at 1:09 pm

    @mooki:
    Hey Mookie,

    Some are identifying this blind item as about Tom and Katie:
    http://thegossipboy01.blogspot.com/2010/03/friday-blind-item.html

    That stuff mentioned in one comment about Suri’s birth certificate is weird – I checked it out at the TMZ site, and no one signed the birth certificate until 20 days after Suri’s birth, no one can tell who signed it on Tom and Katie’s behalf, and no one who was at the birth signed it. Whenever it comes to state paperwork, Tom and/or Katie certainly seem like a slippery pair.

    Reply
  42. Pattyanne said on March 16th, 2010 at 1:20 pm

    Some days are like that Em. It looks like a day to pull up a comfy chair, get a nice cold soda, and settle in for the comedy show.@Emerson:

    Reply
  43. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    got the soda…

    Reply
  44. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 1:37 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    hmmm, who is her assistant? Does she have a friend who is one? I thought she was surrounded by only Scientology people now? Katie look absolutely horrid lately, so maybe it’s eating away at her…

    Reply
  45. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2434998/angelina-jolie-the-tourist-johnny-depp-01/

    how sad are these pics just put out of Angie and Shiloh? God, that poor poor little girl looks soooo unhappy when she is with her mom, and there is zero closeness between them….I wish someone would remove Shiloh from that home! :(

    Reply
  46. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    This link may be better, you had to page back in the link above…

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2435082/angelina-jolie-shiloh-bonding-time-12/

    Reply
  47. Vittoria said on March 16th, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I know I didn’t leave my heart there!

    Reply
  48. mooki said on March 16th, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    @Emerson:

    Katie had an assistant whom she was close friends w/ pre-Tom. Her assistant is now Jessica Savitch, the beastly “wife” of Tommy Davis, David Miscavige’s right hand man.

    funny, a lot of sites are saying that Katie’s hospital visit was a sure sign that she was pregnant… even though her reps have already issued a denial.

    more Scilon craziness on the Today Show this morning:
    http://gawker.com/5494552/scientology-weight+loss-shamstress-kirstie-alley-says-a-bunch-of-bullshit-on-today

    Reply
  49. Pattyanne said on March 16th, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    Oh how heartbreaking! Shiloh is looking totally submissive, not looking up, or around as a happy child would be doing, no bouncing around hollering , Mommy! Mommy! Look at that!, Shiloh is a totally different child when she’s with Brad…or the plethora of nannies/bodyguards. @Emerson:

    Reply
  50. Pattyanne said on March 16th, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    Or any other body part!!! Used to vaca with a g/f at Modesto@Vittoria:

    Reply
  51. Pattyanne said on March 16th, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    Saw a very cute interview with Jennifer Aniston on “Daily 10″ today. She and Gerard were there together to be interviewed for their film The Bounty Hunter, so of course the interviewer asked Jen what Gerard was like in the morning to which Jennifer replied, “Oh, he’s no basterd, but I haven’t seen him in the morning…yet” She and Gerard cracked up laughing at that pun, and Gerry even made note of her wit to her about this. Gotta love Jennifer, she’s so REAL.

    Reply
  52. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I know, it’s really really heartbreaking! There is no connection, not at all, she even looks DOWN, what child does that? If I were Angelina, I think I wouldn’t even ATTEMPT to show any motherly concern for Shiloh, it just comes off as cold and ewww nothing, zero, no happiness!

    Reply
  53. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 4:45 pm

    @mooki:
    hmmm interesting to know! That does sound more and more like her….I did watch the Kirstie interview, LOL, and don’t even get me started on Scientology! There is def something “off” about that religion? cult? Katie looks a little worse for wear if you ask me, like all the time, and I don’t see it doing anything for her….maybe Stepherd wifey?

    Reply
  54. Emerson said on March 16th, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    is anyone else noticing that ever since “turkey neck” Angelina pic was shot, that her “photo ops” that she schedules have never shown her from her right side again?? Everytime I see her pics, or even stills from the film being shot, that plastic surgery enhanced neck is kept from view…cracks me the he** up!

    Reply
  55. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 16th, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    @Emerson:

    Yes there really is not one picture where you see the children cuddling or being affecttionate towards her – or him for that matter – which makes them look all the more like props. There is one pic of her and maddox at the SB where she comes up behind him and puts her arms around him and puts on her fake “loving and motherly” face, but he is not participating in the cuddle at all, just staying exactly where he is and watching the game. If you watch the video from that event the rest of her interactions with him come across less like a mother than a friend of the family who has just been introduced to him but is not naturally adept with children and isn’t quite sure how to act around him, it is beyond awkward. I think that is really Angelina’s essential problem when it comes to interacting with her kids, it is not just that she spends next to no time with them and doesn’t have a motherly bond with them, it is also that she is just one of those people who doesn’t quite know how to be around kids. She is always kind of odd and unnatural with them and it is reflected in the children’s faces. Seriously, I can get a child who has been in my acquaintance for less than 3 minutes to act happier and more affectionate around me than she can manage with her own children. She is just not a motherly person or someone who children warm too, she is too stilted, cold and afraid to make a fool of herself. As for me, I love to make a fool of myself personally – which is why children always find me hilarious! (Cue the Angelina-approved PR’s comments: 1, 2, 3…!). You have to be able to laugh at yourself in this life I think, you can’t take yourself too seriously. I have never heard Angelina make one self-deprecating comment or poke fun at herself in any of the interviews I have ever seen of her – she is just far too into herself!

    Reply
  56. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 16th, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    Oh and can I just ask what is with all this PR activity lately? There is literally not a day that goes by without a new set being released. They are even travelling around the country to give the shots more variety to ensure they keep getting published, it’s ridiculous. I just feel like screaming at them: “It’s ok Brad, we know you have a film coming out soon, we hear ya, just give it a rest already!”.

    Reply
  57. Susie said on March 16th, 2010 at 5:50 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Yeah, no kidding! I was even thinking too that those recent “Angie & Shiloh bonding time” pics were an absolute JOKE. You KNOW she’s only doing that to fight the backlash she’s getting over her poor treatment of Shiloh. What a witch! I don’t know how Brad even lets her have any time alone with her, let alone the rest of the kids! It’s horrible to say, but the kids would be better off if Angelina just died of an overdose. Brad would be too. Brad’s parents could step in and help Brad in settling them somewhere in the states, getting them into a school, and setting up a normal and healthy routine for them. Sigh. Wishful thinking!

    Reply
  58. mooki said on March 16th, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    @Emerson:

    Katie hasn’t been seen out w/ Tommy Boy lately and has been seen driving into the Co$ celebrity center as if on business. tick,tock…

    Reply
  59. Lauren said on March 16th, 2010 at 7:56 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Hey, I just read through those comments and someone mentioned that Holmes had been with Chris Klein just a few short weeks right before she got with Cruise. Wouldn’t it have just made more sense for her to pin the paternity on him?

    Reply
  60. Lauren said on March 16th, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    @Emerson:
    I agree! I remember when I first heard about her “blob” comment and hearing the backlash from that, I knew then that she didn’t care for her child. Back then I thought maybe it was just that she was suffering from a case of postpartum depression, but it hasn’t seemed to wear off. And I’m all for children exploring and growing in their identities and not being forced to be a certain way, but this is clearly forced. First of all, this has been going on for how long? A couple of years now??? Shiloh wanting to be called John or whatever the name is, and wanting to dress like a boy. How dumb do they think we are? Shiloh’s not even 4 years old, yet she was nuanced enough at 2 to decide to actively identify as a boy? I mean, sure children can understand basic differences between boys and girls if we make the gender distinctions clear enough, but how much more does a toddler know then that girls wear pink and play with dolls, and boys wear blue and run around and get dirty. Am I really supposed to believe that Shiloh created this whole gender-bending identity without an adult influencing her? Because I don’t. But I do believe that Angie’s never really cared for the child and is willing to use her (and the rest) in whatever way will benefit her image as the all-accepting, tolerant, unconditionally-loving earth mother.

    Come to think of it, Brad and Angie have all made their children into little characters, or at least the ones they can easily parade around. What is Maddox? The computer-whiz, boy genius? They made Zahara the feisty, spirited one. Shiloh’s the tomboy pretty-girl. I’m not sure about Pax, I think he’s a little too much to handle for them to manage him in front of the paps as well as they can the others. And it’s too young for the twins; that should start up in another 6 mos. to a year. I can totally see them going, “Oh Viv’s so creative, she loves to paint and has so much vision. Knox is really into music. He loves to bang on pots and pans, and he keeps asking for a guitar.”

    Also, I’ve been noticing a lot lately that it seems that the children used to at least try to smile in front of the cameras. I remember seeing a picture of Shiloh and Zahara where it was apparent to me that Angie whispered, “Remember to smile for the people who have cameras, and I’ll buy you lots of toys and candy!” I mean, they both just looked dead at the camera with smiles on their faces and no emotion in their eyes. Whenever I see any other celebrity kids, they either try to engage the cameramen (yelling and waving or something) or ignore them completely. What these kids, though, you can tell their completely aware of the cameras, but they it’s like they don’t have the energy to even try anymore. Everyone just looks depressed. That alone should be some sort of sign to everyone else that something’s not right.

    Reply
  61. sela said on March 16th, 2010 at 11:50 pm

    the following two photos are funny when contrasted.

    http://www.popsugar.com/Photos-Angie-Kids-7786993?page=0,0,7#7

    http://www.popsugar.com/Photos-Angie-Kids-7786993?page=0,0,7#8

    Reply
  62. Sue Ellen 5150 said on March 17th, 2010 at 6:56 am

    @Lauren:
    I really agree with you. What do you think about Ritalin? I know in the US it is very common to give kids these pills. The son of a good friend took this pills for about 6 oder 7 years. He was a very hyperactive child. He has got 2 siblings and the time at home was for his mother very difficult and exhausted. His mother insisted on it that he took his pills the doctor gave him. I met him in an age of fifteen. He came to visit us and he has this pills. I asked him for what this pills were? He explained it to me and I was shoked. After eating this thing, he changed into an completely different character. He sat on a chair and looked like a zombie. Some weeks later he decided to stop taking the medicine. I was so glad for him.

    Now the boy is 22nd and he did not take his pills since then. He is great and doing his things. Sure, sometimes he is a little bit hyper, but not much. That is his own character. People are different.

    IMO many children (particular in the US?) have to eat this “S.hit” for not beeing exhausting and rebellious.
    What a shame! Children can not fight back. Sorry, for my english. I am German.

    Reply
  63. Sue Ellen 5150 said on March 17th, 2010 at 7:02 am

    I forgot: the bonding between mother and son was not warm or special. He left the parental house with 18 years.

    Reply
  64. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 17th, 2010 at 8:29 am

    @ Lauren – I would say that is definitely true, that they are trying to mould the kids into having their own distinct little personalities which will all reflect favourably on Angelina, complementing and enhancing her image without detracting from it in any way of course. There was even a ridiculous press release a while ago which said Z is to be a Doctor and save the world, Maddox and Pax are both crazy about race-driving and are to be formula one drivers (this is genuinely what it said, it was ridiculous) and I think the rest were to be something arty and creative, even tho the “twins” at least had barely made it out of the womb. It truly was Brangelina fantasy fiction at it’s very worst – hilarious. I noticed they immediately toned down this nonsense after the way that release was ridiculed. And anyway, the reality is those kids will probably grow up to be just like their mom and dad: effed up high school drop-outs with delusions of grandeur and a touch of “congenital sadness”. JMO!

    Reply
  65. Emerson said on March 17th, 2010 at 10:56 am

    drat, computer issues last night, lol….when I see these “stars” with their children, I often think of Jennifer Garner and Violet, and while I do not know anything at all about these two, I can say that Violet is one happy happy child! She is always skipping or jumping or looking around at things, and interacting with her mother, and I think she is close in age to Shiloh…if you just compare one photo of these mothers/daughters, you can see the BIGGEST difference! Shiloh really needs to not be in that family, I feel so badly for her, she looks just so unhappy! What was on her face as well? Ice cream? A bruise? Did anyone else notice that? As far as Z is concerned, I think she just has that outgoing personality, which I def had when I was her age…she will probably be that way no matter what is going on in that family dynamic…I too agree with Susie, and wonder, where in the World are his parents, his family? They were so close, and now have little to nothing to do with their grandchildren, I think I would be all over Brad to get his sorry act together, for the sake of his “biological” (if they are indeed his biological) children, and no way would I ever leave them to grow in the Angelina household! I would think she would at least put on a happy face when she arranges these photo ops, but you are true keane, she is just in it for herself, and nothing more….her very first interview (and I know I keep saying this!) after she had Shiloh had her saying she felt “more” for her children who weren’t “born into a life of privilege” but that started out in orphanages, in 3rd World countries, yada yada…who says stuff like that after they have a child??? That to me, just was a red flag, BIG time!! I have always seen the disconnect between her and Shiloh, and it gets worse as Shiloh gets bigger :( someone needs to step in..

    Reply
  66. Emerson said on March 17th, 2010 at 10:57 am

    @mooki:
    the only thing that doesn’t seem to match is that wasn’t her assistant supposed to be married to the boyfriend now, or am I reading this blind vice wrong?

    Reply
  67. lory said on March 17th, 2010 at 12:56 pm

    Really Ian! Why do you miss all the real stories?

    Sandra Bullock Bails on Premiere as Husband Affair Rumor Surfaces

    Wednesday – March 17, 2010 – 1:42pm

    Comments (0) »
    ShareThis

    While The Blind Side hits theaters in London next week, its red carpet premiere has been cancelled after Oscar-winning star Sandra Bullock suddenly bailed on the event.

    A rep for Warner Brothers confirmed to BBC News Bullock suddenly pulled out of plans to appear in the British city; the 45-year-old star is “unable to travel due to unforeseen circumstances,” their statement reads. As a result, the splashy London premiere will not take place.

    PHOTOS: See Sandra and Jesse celebrate at the 2010 Oscars

    Bullock’s abrupt no-show coincides with a new tabloid report alleging her husband Jesse James’ infidelity.

    James, 40, was teary-eyed in the audience at the Kodak Theater when his wife accepted her Best Actress trophy earlier this month.

    “I’m so proud of her,” the motorcycle builder and Spike TV star told UsMagazine.com at the Governor’s Ball. “She deserves it more than anybody.

    PHOTOS: See what all the stars wore on the Oscars red carpet

    When Bullock accepted her Screen Actors Guild Award in January, she praised her normally shy husband of nearly five years for enduring the 2010 awards-show circuit.

    PHOTOS: Check out Sandra’s red carpet style

    “You get dressed up in monkey suits and you sit at a table with people you don’t know,” she gushed to James. “She added, “I love you so much, and you’re really hot. And I want you so much!”

    James recently deleted his Twitter account.

    Get more Us! Follow us on Twitter, Friend us on Facebook, Join Us Weekly’s Celebrity Fantasy League,

    In Touch Exclusive Interview:
    Sandra Bullock’s husband caught cheating!
    SandraBullock0317.jpg “I asked him, ‘What’s going on with you and Sandra?’ He said, ‘She doesn’t live here. She has a house in Austin. She is filming, and I can’t talk about it,’” Michelle “Bombshell” McGee tells In Touch exclusively.

    When Sandra Bullock thanked her bad-boy husband, Jesse James, as she accepted her best actress Oscar for The Blind Side, she may not have known that while she was away shooting the film, Jesse was carrying on a steamy affair with a tattoo model. While Jesse has had an 11-month affair, including five weeks of sex, with Michelle “Bombshell” McGee, she believed he and Sandra were no longer together. “I would never have hooked up with him if I thought he was a married man,” Michelle tells In Touch in an exclusive interview. “He gave me the impression they were separated.” For weeks, while Sandra was in Atlanta shooting The Blind Side, Michelle had sex at least once a week with the Monster Garage star. Far from a one-night stand, his relationship with Michelle was intimate and highly charged. Michelle even says she called Jesse, who didn’t wear underwear or condoms, by a special pet name, Vanilla Gorilla, because he was so “well-endowed.”

    While Jesse was in Atlanta with Sandra when she started to film The Blind Side, Michelle sent West Coast Choppers a friend request because she hoped to snag a modeling gig there. She was surprised that it was actually Jesse who wrote back to her and told her to e-mail him at his personal e-mail. From the start, Jesse wanted to meet Michelle, and it was never about business: “He started saying, ‘Do you want to hang out?’” So a week after he got in touch, Michelle drove two hours from her San Diego home to West Coast Choppers in LA. “I got there around 9 at night,” remembers Michelle, who was starstruck at first. “I was like, ‘Holy s**t. It’s really Jesse James.’” After taking Michelle on a tour of his garage, Jesse brought her into his office and locked the door. “We ended up on the couch,” she says. “He wanted to watch movies, but I asked him, ‘What’s going on with you and Sandra?’” Jesse was evasive. “He said, ‘She doesn’t live here. She has a house in Austin. She is filming, and I can’t talk about it.’” Assuming he and Sandra were separated, Michelle continued talking to Jesse, she says, and then, “We had intimate relations.” Michelle says she and Jesse had sex “two or three times,” that night — and began what she believed was a serious relationship, texting each other several times a day, and meeting up for sex at least twice a week for the next five weeks.

    Win It
    In Touch Weekly
    Wednesday, March 17, 2010
    TOP STORY
    Winslet, Mendes split
    KateWinslet_TS0316.jpg
    Just two years after Revolutionary Road, their movie about a dissolving marriage, Oscar winners Kate Winslet and director Sam Mendes have found their own marriage over.

    Home | Contact Us | Media Kit | Privacy Policy
    Copyright © 2004-2007 In Touch Weekly Magazine. All Rights Reserved.

    Facebook
    Fan us on Facebook!
    Current cover
    IN THIS ISSUE
    Kim and Kourtney Kardashian’s drama: Ditched!
    Kim Kardashian finds her wedding dreams on hold. Meanwhile, her sister Kourtney is left alone with her infant after her boyfriend Scott moves out.

    Kate chooses fame over family
    Determined to be a star, Kate Gosselin seems more focused on her TV career than on being a mom.

    Reply
  68. jan/sa said on March 17th, 2010 at 3:27 pm

    i realy cannot understand why these two morons have to uproot the kids everytime one of them goes somewhere to make another crap movie. i think they have trust issues with one another and if it wasn’t for the kids they would not be together at all. i can’ decide if it is peewee or jolie that does not trust the other partner to be faithfull. but i have never known stars that have the kids on the set every day and so many photo ops with the kids daily it must be tyring an boring for these poor babies
    why could pitt not stay at home with the kids and she could fly in every weekend they are the only two who drag their kids about i this unhealthy and selfish way wosh peewee had half a brain instead of none. i swear if they opened his head they would find infenite space.
    did you read about the ho that now claims she slept with sandra bullocks hubby while she was filming it is a shame that these men cannot keep their pants zipped. so maybe that is why jolie ho keeps him on a tight leash as she thinks his zip is like teflon. jmo

    Reply
  69. lurkeyloo said on March 17th, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    Cheaters are ALWAYS the jealous type. @jan/sa:

    Reply
  70. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 17th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    More pics of Jolie and Depp filming in Venice, her in that ridiculous cream get-up again which makes her look like a kid playing dress-up in mommy’s closet to me – just not convincing at all. Depp looks bizarrely bloated in the face – makes him look more like Luciano Pavarotti than his usual self. Jolie is grinning broadly in all the shots (the only one who is as usual), trying desperately to convince us she is the most desirable woman in the world spending her days hanging out with the world’s most desirable man (who would of course leave his partner and kids for her in the blink of an eye if she so much as nodded in his direction) and then retiring home in the evening to her partner – the former world’s most desirable man of course – and their six adorable little ones who just can’t get enough of their mommy. Yes folks, Jolie lives the life that us mere mortals can but dream of – aren’t you just SO jealous of her? Lol

    Reply
  71. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 17th, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    So – do we think Angelina is doing all this promotion in Venice and releasing this nonsense about Depp to compete with – and ideally squash – Jen’s promotional campaign for The Bounty Hunter? I do.

    Reply
  72. Susie said on March 17th, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    At this point, I think all this promotion has less to do with Jen / her movie and what she’s doing, than it has to do with the details Ian has eluded to (Brad’s love child, impending doom of Brangelina, and her dysfunctional unhappy family, etc. and her overall desperation to cling to the image she’s created and trying to shove down our throats to ensure the world still believes it) Her rivalry with Jen may be a part of it, but I think at this point she has bigger problems – keeping her own image in tact.

    Reply
  73. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 17th, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    @Susie:

    I agree with all that, but we do also have to consider the timing of this particular onslaught of press-whoring and it’s intensity. She is doing pics on a daily basis still, dragging the kids all around Italy like some sort of travelling circus, even after she whipped out the trump cards of the twins AND her father weeks ago and had the far more newsworthy opps of the Superbowl and her Haitii visit splashed all over the press before that. There is no variety to these opps now – we have already seen her in that outfit while filming, we have already seen her with Depp, we have already seen her and Brad dragging those poor unfortunate children around various tourist attractions in Italy, all she is doing now is repeating herself (she is even wearing the same clothes!), and you have to consider why that might be. After that initial big press bam of the twins and her dad simultaneously within a matter of days she had garnered the maximum press she was going to get during the making of this film – why do her people allow it to trickle on day after day, risking the public getting sick of the sight of her? She’s doing it to try to take away attention from Jen’s film, that’s what, as she knows the relative success or failiure of her rival impacts on her own career. And she knows that because she made it that way by pushing down on Jen’s head in order to push her own career up after she got her claws into Brad. And she did it with that fake, insincere beaming smile on her face too, just as she is doing now. Fascinating to watch!

    Reply
  74. Pattyanne said on March 17th, 2010 at 6:17 pm

    Oh she definately is hoping to use this platform to derail Jennifer’s film The Bounty Hunter premiere and accolades for such a funny and entertaining film. I’ve read everywhere that the chemistry between Jen and “Gerry” is explosive. Everywhere you look, it’s all about Bounty, and Jen and Gerry….Angie Ho, not so much. I can imagine Jolie with clenched theeth whinnying look at meeeeeeeee! LOL. Brad is now a tabloid star, no longer an A-List actor, Jolie is just his baby mama, has been film actress. They are so done.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  75. guest123 said on March 18th, 2010 at 5:49 am

    Where’s the big announcement about the actor’s love child……YAWN another Ian “exclusive” that goes NOWHERE

    Reply
  76. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 7:37 am

    @ guest123 – where’s the big announcement about who you really are guest123? I believe you said you were someone really “close” to me? Sounds fascinating, I am practically DYING with excitement…

    Reply
  77. Emerson said on March 18th, 2010 at 8:23 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    lol, anyhoo, why is it that Angelina hates Jen so much? I don’t really get that part, I mean, WHY??? Jen looks GORGEOUS at all of her premieres, dressed sexy, no botox in face or turkey neck, totally toned and fit and 41!! Is it just because Angie looks so disgusting? At 10 years her junior? If she is trying to take the attention away from Jen, it ain’t working! The grecian outfit she wore in NCY for the premiere the other night was a knock out! Meanwhile Angelina wears the same outfit or manly pants, yuck, now I am ready to be sick thinking of how Angielina looks…grossssss

    Reply
  78. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 10:08 am

    @Emerson:

    I’m not sure whether Angelina and her people (i.e. James and Geyer) are just naturally vindictive people, whether there was some sort of perceived slight that they wanted to take revenge for or whether they thought the success of their product (Angelina) depended on the crushing of her perceived rival, Jen. Either way, it was and still remains a very nasty business that must upset Jen greatly. I think it is pretty obvious that James and Geyer are very nasty people. Whether Angelina is or not is another matter – I think she is mostly too strung out to know what is going on half the time. Check out video of her at that Beowulf premiere where she is wearing (almost) the leather pants. She is about the size of a pin and an Irish interviewer who spoke to her commented on how very thin her hair was, even though it had been puffed up in a bouffant style to try to disguise it. She was clearly in quite a bad state even back then. I wonder to what extent she really knows what is going on in her life these days?

    Reply
  79. I'm on the bidet said on March 18th, 2010 at 10:19 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    I suppose we’ll have to guess the identity ourselves. Here’s my guesses:
    - James Haven – has rented apartment above Keane’s, to conduct study of why Keane just isn’t buying into AJ’s elaborate publicity schemes
    - Lindsay Lohan – she’s in London now, and after wandering around inebriated (on every chemical one can ingest), passed out in front of Keane’s address
    - someone that Keane’s former dentist’s neighbor’s third cousin once removed anonymously nudged whilst getting onto a bus 14 years ago (its a very distant definition of close)
    - one of those blue native people from the Avatar movie (telepathy close or whatever that movie was about)
    - Billy Bob Thornton in blue body paint like those people from the Avatar movie, in a drunken sleep in Keane’s coat closet

    Those are my guesses, and I’m hard pressed to believe it could be anyone else . . .

    IOTB

    Reply
  80. Emerson said on March 18th, 2010 at 10:21 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I agree, she is way out of it, and that comes through plain and chear with every photo op…if I were her, I would quit calling the photogs and try to have some semblence of privacy and hide again wherever it is she hides, lol. Meanwhile, Jen looks more and more gorgoeous, toned, and yes, even younger than Angielina! Are you talking about James her brother? I thought he was all “born again” and learning to be a minister, HAHA, so why is he still in this mix? Shouldn’t he be off healing the World?? I will look for the Beowulf premier too…she most likely is on at least methadone, how she can even say her lines is a mystery to me…maybe Johnny puffed out so that she doesn’t go near him? Wishful thinking on my part, but he really does not seem to be at ALL in the moment with this film, and I am sure it will tank just like her other films…when are studios going to see her for what she is and stop offering her films? PLUS, she donates $75,000 to a school in Afghanistan, and it is all over the internet and news, etc., however, Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban do the same thing for a school in Haiti and it’s no where to be found…God I cannot stand Angelina, and Brad needs to take whichever biological kids are his and run, not walk to the nearest airport..

    Reply
  81. guest123 said on March 18th, 2010 at 10:24 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    by closer i meant someone she’s tangled with in the past not in proximity Duh

    Reply
  82. Emerson said on March 18th, 2010 at 10:46 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    LOVE the choices, especially Lindsay Lohan and JAmes Haven!!! Maybe Keane can hear him praying downstairs during his “ministry” homework…

    Reply
  83. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 11:04 am

    @guest123:

    Ah ok so let me get this straight: while I don’t consider anyone posting on this blog to be “close” to me as although we have chatted to each other on the net for over a year now we have never actually met and are mostly separated by a gigantic ocean, I would in fact consider some twerp who I had a row with at some point over the past year (of which there are hundreds) “close” to me – that makes sense! Ok, let me just get something straight: you writing some words on a blog in response to some words I wrote on a blog at some point in the past year does not mean that you and I are – or ever have been – in any sense dating, get it? Where do we find these people?!

    Reply
  84. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 11:07 am

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Oh my God IOTB I think you have actually almost hit the nail on the head! I’ve just remembered that my ex-optician’s neighbour is in fact Jonny Lee Miller (trufax!) – this has to be the secret identity of guest123 right? But did he actually nudge me on a bus 14 years ago? Hm, let me think…. Well there was that weirdo who groped me on a bus when I was 15 – was that you JLM? Lol

    Reply
  85. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 11:10 am

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Although now you’ve mentioned it IOTB, there is a new mysterious tenant who has moved into the flat opposite me in my building who I have yet to establish the identity of…. is it you James Haven? Lol

    Reply
  86. Emerson said on March 18th, 2010 at 11:27 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    well, if it is James Haven, be prepared to “come to Jesus” as he continues to work on his theology degree….;)

    Reply
  87. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 11:48 am

    @Emerson:

    Religious zeal is often a convenient mask behind which to hide one of two things in the public eye: homosexuality or illegal sexual activity. Which is James Haven trying to hide I wonder – or is it both?

    Reply
  88. Emerson said on March 18th, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I vote BOTH, although he was instrumental in getting Angelina and JV back together again, HHAHAAHA, that was supposed to be a funny…

    Reply
  89. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    @guest123:

    Ok Guest123 we’re all still on tenterhooks waiting for you to reveal your true identity. Apparently I am “much closer” to you than I am Mia because I have “tangled with” you in the past. This is interesting to me because I can’t think of anyone who I’ve tangled with more than Mia, except for Angelina/James Haven/Geyer/Angelina’s PR team etc perhaps – so I take it you are them then?!

    Reply
  90. guest123 said on March 18th, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    epic fail as usual dear

    Reply
  91. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    @guest123:

    Oh god not you again Constant Gardener/Keane’s Cat – can’t you stick to your own kind? So you think you’re “close” to me do you dear? In your dreams!

    Reply
  92. Emerson said on March 18th, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    dang! I missed Constant Gardener/Keane’s Cat, do fill in!

    Reply
  93. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 18th, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    @Emerson:

    Seriously, it’s not worth the effort to type. But what I will say is that she has contacts at blogspot (”in sales (-tele) it is all about relationships”) – that is one little gift of a quote that just keeps on giving! Oh and everything that ever happened in the history of time including the epic fail that is her or his (who cares which) life is a conspiracy. And that is about all you ever need to know about that!

    Reply
  94. Emerson said on March 18th, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    got it! LMAO!! Yee old conspiracy theries??? uh huh…

    Reply
  95. Pattyanne said on March 18th, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    Oh Em, you don’t want to know. Keane’s Cat is the most vile, no boundaries, chyt spewing beast. Can’t be human, no compassion, no limits of the depths of venom. Think of the worst thing anyone could say to you to hurt you….then think of something beyond that….no limits remember, anything goes, and then multiply this by a psychopath’s mind and you have Keane’s Cat and all her alias’. A real vicious biotch! Say and do anything to beat a person down. @Emerson:

    Reply
  96. Pattyanne said on March 18th, 2010 at 6:06 pm

    P.S. I did notice at one time her fellow bloggers on FF were calling her “Constipated Gardner”…guess they know she’s full of chyt too.

    Reply
  97. Therese said on March 19th, 2010 at 12:53 am

    So sad about Sandra Bullock and her cheating husband!

    Reply
  98. mooki said on March 19th, 2010 at 6:09 am

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/03/18/tom-cruise-katie-holmes-hot-tub-premiere/

    Tom and Katie desperate for camera hogging. United Artists (which he owns) produces that Hot Tub Time Machine and is going to be swallowed up by Time-Warner.

    by summer, Tomkat will be done.

    Reply
  99. Emerson said on March 19th, 2010 at 8:56 am

    @Pattyanne:
    LOL GREAT recap! I love the “constipated Gardner” name….hmmm, this blog rocks…

    Reply
  100. Emerson said on March 19th, 2010 at 8:57 am

    @mooki:
    OR she will be in the psych ward from too many Scientology “cleanes”

    Reply
  101. alif said on March 19th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Recent developments are enough for Tommy C. to pull out his hair plugs!

    Reply
  102. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 19th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    @Therese:

    Hm, I just have this feeling that Sandra bats for my team, she is very butch. Maybe she picked that man as a beard to try to make her look a little more feminine. It always came across as a bit of an odd pairing to me. Bloody hell there are a lot of lesbians in showbusiness hey? Who’d have thought it!

    Reply
  103. Lauren said on March 19th, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    YES! I thought the exact same thing. I personally think that they met each other, became best friends, and she made an arrangement with him. In return, he could sleep with whoever he wanted as long as he didn’t get caught. But that’s JMO.

    Reply
  104. Lauren said on March 19th, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    @Sue Ellen 5150:
    I never thought about them actually drugging the kids. It makes since. Kids there age just don’t act so subdued. But, of course, I have no idea.

    Reply
  105. ancient chinese secret said on March 19th, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    well she did team up with Keanu Reeves twice right? He’s bi for sure with a preference towards the men. They all stick together you know….

    Reply
  106. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 19th, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @ancient chinese secret:

    You would have thought he was gay wouldn’t you considering he’s never had any high profile relationships. I know someone who knows him but she never said one way or the other, I never asked though. Damnit, must look her up and put my mind to rest! As for Sandra though, her and Keanu both fall into the “don’t really care who they have sex with” bracket for me. They don’t market themselves on being sexy beasts – she is a comedienne and he is more of a romantic lead sans sexual organs in my view – so it doesn’t really matter what or who they do in their private lives to me. I actually think that, like Jen, lesbo rumours would give her a bit of much needed “sexing up”. Not sure middle America would agree with me though!

    Reply
  107. mooki said on March 19th, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/2010/03/18/13283866-ap.html

    recent Polanski developments.

    Samantha Geimer = member of the Rachel Uchitel “i’m not a hooker” club

    Reply
  108. JP SUPPORTER AND PROUD OF IT. said on March 19th, 2010 at 6:39 pm

    I realize that this site is managed by a clique of JP haters, but there are plenty of pictures out there of Shiloh smiling and bonding with either Angie or Brad and her siblings. But of course when she smiles then rumors start that Angie knocked her tooth out. Whenever she is in boy’s clothes then she is accused of being gay or transgendered or unhealthily involved with Brad or her brothers. The kid can’t win. The JP’s can’t win. There is absolutely no cause, issue, or situation where the clique on this site would even consider cutting them a break. You all are like those that believe the world is flat or the Holocaust never happened. No matter what evidence is presented denials are issued. Unfortunately for Ian, you all cause him to lose readers and posters that would increase his hits. I’ve seen things written about you all and him on other blog threads and basically the writers consider this site a lost cause due to the hatred spewed by the clique. I like Ian’s books and his writing, but I generally don’t read the comments because of the narrow minded and closed minded few that have to ruin this blog for everyone.

    I’ve had my say!

    Reply
  109. alif said on March 20th, 2010 at 1:58 am

    A French pal and I went to be extras just for a lark in one of Sandra Bullock’s movies. Jeremy Northam, who played her nemesis was standing beside me for a take. He said something under his breath which made me laugh.
    But just as the director called ACTION, a huge woman cut in front of me as we were supposed to be walking. So that was that!
    Ms. Bullock ran right by me for several takes.

    A twist of fate: Sandra Bullock produced a movie called “Crash”. Critics loathed it, as did many higher educated minorities. If my memory serves, a NY critic gave it 2 stars (out of 5).
    Bear with me, please!
    It was the oscar season, and “Brokeback Mountain”, which had won many, many critics awards for Best Picture, (including The BAFTAS) looked like a good bet for the oscar.
    However, several things sabotaged its chances:
    1) Jay Leno, host of The Tonight Show started to make fun of the pic in December. It was reported that he made fun of it about half of December. (Jay is obssessed with gays!)
    It just so happens that many of the oscar voters are seniors and older. Presumably they are retired and watch late nite shows.
    2) Tony Curtis and Ernest Borgnine, both well over eighty, came out in public against “Brokeback Mountain” citing the memory of John Wayne. (It never occurred to them that gays played key roles in their successful careers.)
    3) Harry Hamlin, a male starlet gave an interview wherein he whines about a movie, “Making Love” that he made; presumably it was a free choice, but which he says hurt his career, big time. (Hmm, talent, or lack thereof may have something to do with it?)
    Jodie Foster, (a lesbian, for crying out loud) joined the anti-Brokeback bandwagon. Others like little David Spade came out against the movie. Then movie columnist, Liz Smith echoed their stance. She printed her negative views. (Liz Smith is a self-proclaimed lesbian, over 80yrs.)
    4) Now, in Southern California, there are many retirees from show business. A San Diego paper printed a cartoonist’s drawing of John Wayne in a dead faint in heaven; and an angel explaining to another, that he, John Wayne, had just learned about “Brokeback Mountain”. That is how I remember it. The angel may have instead stated “He just saw ‘Brokeback Mountain’”.
    This all transpired during the oscar voting period.

    So, while I admire Sandra Bullock’s belief about everyone deserving a chance for equality, I have mixed feelings about her because her critically dubbed movie upset a far superior movie.

    Reply
  110. alif said on March 20th, 2010 at 2:06 am

    Sorry! Meant to say “critically drubbed” movie.

    But while I’m here, I may as well say that Julia Roberts was once “America’s Sweetheart”. She has had her share of gay co-stars. They make her look good.
    Same with Barbra Streisand. She has to have weaker male co-stars who make her look good.

    Reply
  111. mooki said on March 20th, 2010 at 6:05 am

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/03/20/tom-cruise-katie-holmes-lakers-game/

    look at the happy couple… lmfao

    Reply
  112. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 20th, 2010 at 8:59 am

    Did Sandra Bullock (I was going to call her Sandra Bush then for some reason – slip of the tongue – oo-er!) produce Crash? I did not know that. Bloody awful film, God knows how it ever won any prizes. It should have been called Crass, not Crash, it was about as subtle as being hit in the head with a brick! And Brokeback Mountain is such a heartbreakingly beautiful film, with amazing performances by amazing actors in it, even more heartbreaking since Heath’s death. I love that director, he knows the value of not overstating things and drawing emotion from nuances. Such a beautiful film.

    Reply
  113. alif said on March 20th, 2010 at 2:00 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Yes, I read on several occasions that Sandra Bullock produced it. I think she even mentioned it with pride.

    It was such a bad film; but it made the voters choose it as an alternate to “Brokeback Mountain”. They could feel good about themselves for giving it their biggest prize, while avoiding any controversy. They, in fact, became skittish about the superior “Brokeback Mountain”. And, of course, there are the anti-homosexual factions.

    So when the San Diego Union-Tribune did its annual recap of its cartoons, they included the one about John Wayne.
    I sent a fax to the paper, listing how John Wayne was well aware of gays during his career. I stated that John Wayne had many gay and lesbian co-stars.
    Nothing came of it.
    A little imp is suggesting that I send the cartoonist a note that John Wayne did, in fact, play both sides of the team.
    But I doubt that would enlighten the cartoonist! (There is none so blind as they who cannot see!)

    Reply
  114. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 20th, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    @alif:

    You’ve got to do that Alif – people need to have their eyes opened to how many closeted gay people there are in the world, and how many people they admire are actually the thing they abhor! This is what I mean about there being a moral imperative for gay people in the public eye to be open about their sexuality. The only way to combat prejudice is for the world to know how many gay people there really are in all sectors of life until it becomes “normal”. Of course people have a right to a private life, and not to have to discuss their personal life in public, but they should not openly lie about it and pretend to be something they’re not. A “no comment” is far more acceptable than a lie. And I have to say it really is disgusting in this day and age that there could have been a campaign against that movie because it was about a love affair between two men. The fact that the film was even controversial at all appalls me. The human race still has a very long way to go before it accepts a few very fundamental facts about it’s biology doesn’t it? It bemuses me.

    Reply
  115. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 20th, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    This is a funny one of Angelina, what is she trying to do here – balance a couple of fried eggs on her chest? Lol

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1259370/Angelina-Jolies-pointing-right-direction-films-boat-trip-scenes-The-Tourist.html

    Reply
  116. mooki said on March 20th, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    http://perezhilton.com/2010-03-20-kirstie-alley-tweets-her-anger

    Kirstie’s lost it.

    Reply
  117. Pattyanne said on March 20th, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    I’m shocked at how anorexic she appears! The dress she’s wearing must have been fitted to her in the beginning of filming, yet even the sleeves seem baggy on her rail thin arms. Her face! The deep lines, the bags underneath her eyes! Her shoes even seem too wide for her extremely thin feet. She looks tired, worn out, and on the edge. She’s starting to show the strain of a fauxmance as has her partner for a much longer time. Image……..a camera adds many pounds to one’s frame, yet Angie still looks skeletal thin.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  118. I'm on the bidet said on March 20th, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    J. Depp doesn’t look so hot either – face is kind of flattened and puffed up, has he been boozing and/or put on a lot of weight? I suspect both of them are wearing undergarment supports so elaborate that skyscraper engineers would gasp “damn, that’s complicated!”.

    Okay folks, time for a joke-off. Finish this sentence: “Captain Jack Sparrow is starting to look like . . .”
    - Captain Jack Cheese
    - Captain Flap Jack
    - Captain D (oily seafood restaurant chain in USA)
    - Monterey Jack
    - Captain Fat Guy (running out of ideas here)

    IOTB

    Reply
  119. I'm on the bidet said on March 20th, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    @mooki:
    Katie just looks weird no matter what mood she’s in, doesn’t she? Not a great smile, no great relaxed look, etc. You get the feeling she’s always really wound up and stressed below the surface. And I hate the ‘pre-torn’ jeans look, its just idiotic to me that people buy clothes that someone else was payed to tear up!

    Reply
  120. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 20th, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    I know, although it is a bit of a mystery as he was interviewed for a chat show in the UK (Jonathan Ross) a couple of weeks before and he looked his usual skinny in the face self, so I am not sure how he would or could have gained the weight this fast. Some people are saying it isn’t him in the pics but his stand-in but I don’t really buy that, and he has had moments of face-bloat before – the cover of that issue of People where he was named sexiest man in the world or something – maybe it is the drink? Whatever the reason I definitely vote Captain Flap Jack as the winner, or maybe Captain Jack Marrow? Sorry, that was crap, I am too tired to be funny tonight!

    Oh and AJ just looks like regular skeletal, junkie AJ with a bigger wig and cheaper padding in these pics I would say. She is definitely channeling a touch of the Joan Collinses in these Venice pics though, rather than what she aims for which is obviously Cleoptra-era Liz Taylor. Looing back at her photos, her face-lifts have been obvious as far back as even the promotion for Mr and Mrs Smith I reckon, when she would have supposedly been what 28 or 29? Yeah, I don’t think so. I think Jolie saw the big 4-0 come and go a few years ago now!

    Reply
  121. Pattyanne said on March 20th, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    Google Johnny Depp’s Face Bloated and you will get a ton of hits on this topic. Seems everyone is wondering whether he is on meds for some illness, or just has to have a few drinks in order to be on the set all day with Angie Ho. Hope he’s well, he’s one of the few “good guys” left in HollyWeird.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  122. Pattyanne said on March 20th, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2008/02/22/angelina-s-lesbian-lover.aspx

    Angie and Misty Cooper who met on the set of Gone In 60 Sec.

    Reply
  123. Pattyanne said on March 20th, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-Address&rlz=1I7GGLL_en&q=brad+pitt+ex+girlfriend&revid=1378163383&resnum=0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=N0mlS5eSJYyVtge23pmbCg&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=4&ved=0CB4QsAQwAw

    Photo gallery of Brad Pitt and his former lovers. As you view these photos note how his appearance morphed into the male version of his current female lover.

    Reply
  124. Lauren said on March 20th, 2010 at 7:58 pm

    IDK, I started noticing that Johnny was putting on the chuck when he was doing publicity for Public Enemies. He was noticeably bigger than is POC days to me. I hope nothing’s wrong with him, and I def. hope he keeps his distance from Angelina. I really can’t see him ever even being attracted to her (I mean, he’s had far more appealing female costars in the recent past), but I def. wouldn’t put it past Angelina to try to trick him. And it doesn’t sound like something he’d do, but I hope he doesn’t fall for their kids having a play-date. Could you imagine Angelina using Johnny’s kids as props?

    Reply
  125. Lauren said on March 20th, 2010 at 8:06 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I agree! When I look at Angie, I can’t imagine her being only 34 (let alone younger than Jen). She looks more like 44. I’ve never seen a woman age so much. That, to me, is a tell-tale sign that Brangelina is first-and-foremost a business. They may have had some good times partying together, but people in a healthy relationship with successful careers don’t age 10 -15 years in 5.

    Reply
  126. buying generic cialis said on March 21st, 2010 at 8:02 am

    I added your blog to bookmarks. And i’ll read your articles more often!

    Reply
  127. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 9:34 am

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/03/20/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-brunch-break/comment-page-10/#comments

    Look – no gills! Lol

    In all seriousness can I ask what on earth is going on here? Angelina looks like she is going cold turkey from something very strong, and I don’t mean like caffeine. Looks-wise she is turning into Michael Jackson. I don’t think she is long for this world I’m sorry. There is no way someone can abuse their body as much as she has and not suffer long-term damage from it. I’m amazed she’s lasted this long in fact.

    Reply
  128. Lauren said on March 21st, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Did they highlight Shiloh’s hair?

    Reply
  129. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    @Lauren:

    Weird isn’t it? Sure looks like it, it is now all streaky. This must be in response to the negative press surely – what are they trying to do, phase her old hair colour back in? What on earth are they doing to the poor thing – they need to leave her hair alone!

    Reply
  130. Kate said on March 21st, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I told you, she dyed that kids hair mousy brown, and when she got the flack for it now she is trying to fix it. A child’s hair does not change that fast. Maybe in another 2 or 3 years, but it was just last September -October she was a tow head, and now just 6 months later it is brown.No way. It was long, like Suri’s hair, and very very blond.
    She cut it, and she dyed it. Has to be a reason though, maybe the kids cut her hair. Can’t imagine why she dyed it, unless she is morphing into her dead mother.

    Reply
  131. mooki said on March 21st, 2010 at 2:00 pm

    http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/actor-jon-voight-congresswoman-michele-bachmann-and-dr-milton-wolf-obamas-second-cousin-will-speak-in-opposition-to-obamacare-at-the-code-red-rally-in-washington-dc-this-saturday-at-noon-88565257.html

    I’m not surprised @ this. the teabaggers were spitting and shouting racist and homophobic slurs @ several of the Congressmen.

    like we’ve said on here before, Angie probably also hates Obama but she’d bed him in a heartbeat… but Michelle Obama would probably do everything possible to ruin her career if it did happen (don’t mess w/ a girl from the s. side of Chicago, Angie!)

    Reply
  132. Diana said on March 21st, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    Ian, I heard about your movie on Michael and most of the fans are mad and they want to stop you…but I beg you, don´t give up! The truth should be known!

    The so called Michael “fans” don´t give a damn about your coverage about the allegations…they want to stop you because you said Michael was gay and I just find it ridiculous!

    Reply
  133. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    @Kate:

    I know you’ve read this article Kate but for those who haven’t it is well worth reading:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-329682/Angelinas-disturbing-world.html

    Isn’t it shocking how her press changed so fast from this pretty damning account to her current saintly status? It is like all the details of her past brought up in this article have been conveniently forgotten and written off as the foolish whims of a teenager as opposed to the serious acts of a grown woman which she was. Odd don’t you think?

    And as for Shiloh’s hair well as well I know how barmy this woman is even I find it hard to understand what the motivation was for cutting and dying her hair. All I can come up is the following:

    1) The kids were running riot and acting out as usual and one of them took a pair of scissors and some paint maybe to her hair which would not come out, or put gum in her hair or something so they had to cut and dye it to disguise it? She had very light hair so it is possible that it would stain quite easily. Even so I find it quite hard to imagine what substance the kds would have had access to that they would have been able to put into her hair to disguise it.

    2) That it was done deliberately because what mom didn’t like the attention shiloh gets or maybe to get some revenge on Brad or his family in some way by making their beautfiul little girl look less beautiful? I think considering the poor little thing has been going through this odd metamorphosis from a little girl into more than a tomboy but really just a little boy lately and is missing a tooth you have to wonder what is guiding all this. Plus they had obviously been trying to hide her hair for a while with the hats and the thing she was wearing with the monkey ears, they must have known it was going to be commented upon. Did Angie do it in a fit of rage against daddy’s favourite? Who knows, so hard to get into the head of someone like her whose every motivation is completely at odds with anything I could ever think or feel. All I know is I would take Shiloh off her hands in a shot. She is such a gorgeous little girl but has such a sweet, sad temperament, she just looks like she is desperate for love. I feel so, so sorry for the little thing, more than even Pax who must be completely effed up by the life he has led so far. Maddox, Zahara and Pax all look hardened to life, like they have been damaged so much that their emotions have already shut down. Shiloh on the other hand looks needy and crying out for affection, and she just isn’t going to get it from mommy dearest at least is she? Not if her little trip to the Russian orphanages looking for the blonde-haired, blue-eyed little boy of slavic origin is anything to go by hey?

    Reply
  134. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    End of paragraph 1) was supposed to say “dye it” not “disguise it”. Crappy cold affecting brain sorry!

    Reply
  135. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @mooki:

    I just saw that on TV mooki and I was truly disgusted by it. It was probably one of the most disgusting things I have ever seen on TV in fact. There are genuinely people left in the western world who are happy to have themselves filmed shouting not only homophobic but racist abuse at people? And not just any person but the people who have been chosen to represent them in government too? And for what reason? Because these people had killed a child, or raped a grandmother or stolen millions of pounds from someone’s pension fund or something? Uh, nope, because they advocate a system which guarantees health care for all and not just those who can afford it, that’s why – what a f*cking outrage. If anyone was ever to wonder why a lot of people in the world have a negative opinion of Americans then I’m afraid folks, this would be your answer. Not the US of A’s finest hour. I’ve never been that bothered about Obama and think the idol-worship surrounding the man during his election campaign was bordering on insanity, but in this instance I will get right behind him and shout “Go Obama” with all my might. Hope he sticks it right to the nasty homophobes and racists who think only straight white folks deserve an equal chance to live.

    Reply
  136. alif said on March 21st, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Should AJ fall victim to her self-destructive choices; I, for one, will expect the CYBERLOONIES to blame JA for the tragedy!

    Reply
  137. Real Talk said on March 21st, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    @Kate:
    I am glad to see you finally covinced Keane that Angie dyes Shiloh hair. I put a link up a few weeks ago with a quote from Angie that her mom dyed her hair. It’s kind of obvious that a person hair color doesn’t change overnight. I wonder what will happen this summer with her hair color. It should be lighter with all of the sun but who knows. Brangie need to stop purposefully dressing Shiloh like a boy. Would they allow Maddox to wear a pink dress if he wanted? Lets get real. She can wear less feminine clothes but the boy’s clothes look ridiculous. She doesn’t know the difference between boy and girl clothes at three years old and unless someone is teaching her to imitate a boy. Everyone knows children wear what their parents buy them. Just last year she wore dresses and carried a doll. Now she is a mini lesbian. Give me a break. JMHO

    Reply
  138. Real Talk said on March 21st, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I don’t think Sandra Bullock is butch. She isn’t one of those fake starlet that needs to ooze her sexuality at every change. Being gay or bi is not a big deal in hollywood anymore (especially for women). It helps a lot of their careers. I think Sandra is just like a lot of woman who got burned by a good-for-nothing man. She wouldn’t have made that heartfelt Oscar speech where she praised her husband if it was all a game. Most oscar winners say the regular I love my partner or they forget to thank him/her. I like most people thought they were a nice couple until the news came out.
    Although Crash won a few years back for best picture that was not because of Sandra Bullock. And she may have been in a movie with Keanu but that because he was a bigger star at the time. People can work with gays or bis and not be gay or bi themselves. Speed made a lot of money so why wouldn’t she do
    Speed 2? I think some of you are getting carried away.
    In my opinion Sandra got burned worst that Jen because she even took in his children and the motherf*cker is banging some tatted-up ho who is no better than his porn-star ex-wife. He not only hurt his wife, he also hurt his children who have to go to school and be teased by other kids. Kids are very cruel as we all know. At least Sandra can hide out but not his kids that have pazzo at their school. What a dumbass. JMHO

    Reply
  139. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    @Real Talk:

    She didn’t need to convince me – I have never had strong opinions on the subject one way or another! You talk as if I have violently opposed this argument for months – um nope!

    Reply
  140. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @Real Talk:

    I take it you work in HW then to be able to make that assertion about how someone’s sexuality would affect their careers? Not that I would necessarily disagree with you, there are a lot of lesbians in television and it doesn’t hurt your career to be one in the slightest. Just wondering how you could make that assertion unless you work in that industry yourself?

    Oh and I don’t agree that Sandra Bullock praising her husband in her speech meant anything whatsoever. Actors lie all the time in order to further or protect their careers, and Oscar-acceptance speeches are certainly no exception to that rule. And Jesse James, um, “good-looking”? I think not even his supposedly loved up wife would have described him as that!

    Reply
  141. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    @alif:

    Alif that is guaranteed!

    Reply
  142. Real Talk said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    If you look back at our former exchange when I linked her quote you told me that Angie is lying and that Marcheline wouldn’t dye her hair. All I am saying is she said her mother dyed her hair and it looks like she dyed Shiloh’s hair. She definitely dyed or let Mad and Pax hair be dyed. All I am saying is consider it since none of us knows whether way. But we know hair color doesn’t change overnight!

    Reply
  143. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    @Real Talk:

    Um, can you link me to that because I do not remember ever saying that or certainly ever thinking it? I can perfectly accept that her mother might have dyed her hair – the family are completely bonkers – this would be far from the least crazy thing any of them might have ever done! And I certainly have NEVER had a strong opinion on what is going on with poor little Shiloh and either her hair or her sartorial choices. I genuinely do not know, find the whole thing utterly weird and am really waiting for more about the story to come out before I form an opinion. I think my previous post demonstrates pretty clearly that I really do not know one way or the other!

    Reply
  144. Real Talk said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    I don’t need to work in hollywood to see that there are successful gay and bi people. Look at Angie, Fergie,
    Lady Gaga, Jodie Forster, Ellen, Wanda Sykes etc. You may not be a fan but they are all successful. And to say someone in a bad relationship is a total front because he/she is secretly gay then that is not a good argument. I hate when people use the argument that someone must be gay if he/she is not in a relationship or in a failed one. I support gay rights and I thought Brokeback Mountain was a good movie that deserved best pic. I think it is a disservice to gays and bis fighting for their rights if they try to out or accuse people they don’t know of being closeted. Some people in hollywood are in the closet but some aren’t. Not all my comments were directed at you just a some of the comments made in general.

    Reply
  145. Real Talk said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    My mistake it wasn’t you but Pattyanne. All I remember is was someone’s opinion I respect and someone’s comments I generally like to read. It’s not difficult for me to believe that Angie’s mom may have been off cause the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
    #
    Real Talk said on February 23rd, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    What kind of parent says they prefer one child over the other. I only hear people say that they love all
    of their children. I am worried for Shiloh after reading the message boards and looking closely at pictures.
    I could have sworn that she was a boy in the Venice pics. I knew “it” was too old to be Knox. Only until I saw she with her blanket and a thumb in her mouth that it was Shiloh.
    Thumb sucking is a way to control stress. I know from personal experience. All of her kids look sad to me. Brad is a bitch to allow this. I believe he is a closeted homosexual with all of his morphing into his partners. He has no identity.
    As for Angie, she gives me this creepy sinister vibe. I feel she is evil. I use to buy the story that Brad left Jen because he wanted kids. But that was until I saw how much she courted the media and pimped the kids out. Can we say “mommy dearest” anyone?
    JMO
    Reply
    #
    Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    I doubt anyone believes Marcia Lynne Bertrand Voight dyed Angelina’s hair as a child. That’s just another of Jolie’s fabrications to suit her purpose. Her entire career is filled with false stories about her childhood.@Real Talk:
    Reply

    Reply
  146. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    @Real Talk:

    You do though, you made that assertion as if you know, but unless you are a gay person working in that particular industry you really don’t. It’s like me turning around and confidently declaring that a non-white person is never affected by their skin colour in whatever their chosen profession is – I simply could not do that, I do not have the authority. And believe me when I say your sexuality does affect your career even in open-minded industries such as showbiz for a very simple reason: the business is an utterly ruthless, vicious one and any perceived characteristic or weakness in a person can be used against you. People are hired and fired on the basis of whether a particular person likes or dislikes them and there are no rules or regulations to govern this whatsoever. So yes I have had instances in my career where men have taken an obvious liking to me and maybe it might help me getting a job. If they knew I was gay would they have done this? Highly doubtful. The business is so very ruthless you have to use anything and everything you can to get ahead so I would have been very foolish to have worn a badge saying “I Am Gay” when I was networking with people to get jobs. They don’t need to know what my sexual preferences are so let them think what they like, it really isn’t any of their business. And if you think I haven’t seen men speak in a negative way about gay women in the industry then you can think again – it is nowhere near as open-minded as some people think. I worked in a company that was run by a gay man and had lots of gay men in it, but I knew some gay girls there who kept their sexuality and relationship private because not everyone is as tolerant as one might think. So yeah, in conclusion, you do definitely need to work in that industry and ideally be gay to give an authoritative opinion on that issue, because I am and do, so unless you work in HW I would really have a lot more of an insight into it than you!

    With reference to what else you said, I’m not sure Fergie is openly bi is she? I know she has admitted to “lesbian experiences” in the past while on meth but I think she stopped pretty short of saying she was bi. Saying you’ve got off with a chick in the past or find women sexy (as Christina Aguilera often says for example) is a whole different ball park to being openly gay or bi. And I’m not really sure what you mean by saying that I think that if a relationship fails I automatically think that that must be because one or both of them is gay – I definitely don’t think that. If I did I would be saying that Tiger Woods’ wife must be gay too which I definitely do not think. I think Sandy is gay for completey different reasons. “It takes one to know one” is how I would describe that. Sometimes it is just glaringly obvious. I had just never considered it before because I had never thought about Sandra period!

    Reply
  147. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    @Real Talk:

    Thank you! I have definitely never thought that or said that. Angelina was clearly fair-haired and fair-skinned as a child (taking after Voight rather than her mother) and has dyed her hair and presumably tanned her skin ever since to look darker. (She also wears green coloured contacts to change her natural grey eye colour). Another reason why she looks so old maybe? God knows why her mother dyed her hair as a child though, it is beyond odd and the chemicals are not at all good for you. But then these people are whacko so why would I be surprised?

    Reply
  148. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Oh and I might add that if you are a young, attractive-enough gay female you are gossiped about and discussed ad infinitum by men, you are like their fantasy/entertainment, it is not nice. You wouldn’t believe the number of times I have had men come up to me and say “oi let’s get the video cameras out” when I was with a girl in a club or rubbing their hands with glee. On the flipside I have also had some very negative responses from men: disgust, outrage, homophobia the lot. I’ve even had a bouncer shout at me and tell me to “pack that in” because I was kissing a girl. As I said before, straight people can never really understand the prejudice gay people suffer because they just don’t experience it, just as I don’t experience racism. It’s a very dangerous game to make sweeping generalizations about things like homophobia or racism when you are not someone who experiences it.

    Reply
  149. Pattyanne said on March 21st, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    Just to satisfy my curiosity, i Googled ” mother colored Angelina Jolie’s hair as a child”….all it came up with is the repeated comments made by Jolie recently that her mother began dying her hair at age 4. So I did a search on childhood photos of Angelina Jolie and found one pre-four years old of Angie sitting on her father’s lap as he was reading a book to her. Her hair as a toddler was lighter than it has been at times, but by no means was she blond. More of a mousey brown. We all know that as we age our hair color often changes, darkens, grays, and eventually to the most unfortunate, falls out. Perhaps Jolie is setting up the scenario for her early graying? I did see photos lately of her with light brown hair and black roots..does that count? In truth, her hair color in itself isn’t important, but the addition of lie upon lie told by Jolie is. Shiloh’s hair is changed in a matter of days….not months, ergo, it’s not a natural change imo. Maybe Jolie doesn’t want Shiloh to be “The Fairest Of Them All”, but alas, not knowing her personally, I can only observe and comment my personal opinion as we all do here.

    Reply
  150. Pattyanne said on March 21st, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    http://www.galeon.com/guarderiadefamosos/jolie.htm

    Childhood photo gallery of AJ

    Reply
  151. Real Talk said on March 21st, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    That’s horrible what you have been though. I live in the South and some people here hate to see
    interracial hetero couples so same sex couples don’t stand a chance. Maybe you have picked up on
    something about Sandra, but it seems to me she would have picked a better dude than Jesse James (someone more clean cut). Its too bad because there are lots of people with talent that are gay and that is what they should be judge by. Some gays and bi have a large fanbase but I am sure they went though a lot. Its not hard to believe that there are a lot of douchebags in hollywood who would act like asses towards gays cause they want to treat straight women like sex objects.

    Reply
  152. Lauren said on March 21st, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    @Real Talk:

    “And to say someone in a bad relationship is a total front because he/she is secretly gay then that is not a good argument. I hate when people use the argument that someone must be gay if he/she is not in a relationship or in a failed one.”

    “I believe he is a closeted homosexual with all of his morphing into his partners. He has no identity.”

    You are, essentially, doing the same thing here. By saying that Brad morphs into his partners, you are commenting negatively on his relationships and making the assumption that it is so because he is gay. I was one who said that I think Bullock may be closeted, but I don’t think that is because her relationship failed/is failing. It didn’t come to me until this alleged affair came to light; it’s just something about the way that she’s been in her relationships that seems a little too nonchalant. IDK, I don’t know for sure. She could bi, she may not be. It’s more to do with how she acts, or doesn’t act, than with the actual state of her relationships. Do I think that she loves Jesse? I’m inclined to believe so, but that doesn’t mean a thing one way or the other.

    As for your examples, the fact that their sexuality is used in different ways can’t be ignored. For the sex-symbols, their sexuality is used to further their image as vixens or sexually uninhibited. And we can’t forget the fact that both Angie and Fergie ultimately ended up in heterosexual relationships (with Angie only being public with men). For the the others who don’t manipulate their sexualities to further their careers, they aren’t considered sex symbols. What I’m trying to say here is that we can’t ignore the role of sexism when it comes to discussing sexuality. Women are often times given more leeway in their “alternative” sexualities as long as it can appeal to the desires of straight men. This, in my opinion, may explain (at least somewhat) why some women are championed for their lesbian or bisexuality (Angie), while others are often ridiculed, especially when they abandon the image of the lesbian/bisexual women that appeal to straight men (Rosie O’Donnel, Ellen– who is often compared to men).

    Reply
  153. Lauren said on March 21st, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    @Real Talk:

    Not to keep picking on what your comments because I thoroughly enjoy them (and all of the others that are thoughtful and not trolls), but I’m also from the South and I’ve heard some people say that their parents would rather have them be homosexual than in an interracial relationship. But those opinions have definitely been in the minority. Suffice it to say, it’s just hard for any relationship that doesn’t conform to the heterosexual, sexist, Christian-right, white model.

    Reply
  154. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    @Real Talk:

    To be honest what I have encountered is probably far less than most gay women encounter as I am very feminine looking and the type that men fancy. Ergo it is titillating to them for the most part rather than disgusting. However, my sex life really is not for the entertainment and fantasy-fulfilment of men. It is my private affair and strictly not anyone else’s business or for anyone else to think about. But I guess men can be very childish about women anyway so what should I really expect when there is the added frisson of lesbianism thrown into the mix? I always remember working at this particular company – the one I mentioned before which was very gay anyway – and sitting with the female 40 y/o P/D I was working with opposite a man of similar age doing the same job and his male researcher who was in his 20’s like me. Out of the four of us, three had gone to oxford (the P/D’s knew each from there and had gone to the same college in fact) and the young male researcher was very yah and privately educated. Well this couple of men spent the whole time gossiping with each other about the hot women who worked in the office and leering at them. The P/D was married with a child and the younger guy had a girlfriend but did this stop them – no sirree! It was like a couple of school boys in the playground. Can you imagine if they had known that I was gay as well? That would have been like all their xmases had come at once! And you know when you’re working and want to be respected as a professional, the last thing you want is to be treated like a sex object, it really isn’t. And these were supposedly your more enlightened, educated of the species! Mind you, it wasn’t much better at college, bloody awful in fact. Even the most intelligent of guys, your friends even, can act like a d*ck when he is around just his guy mates I have discovered!

    Reply
  155. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 21st, 2010 at 6:29 pm

    @Lauren:

    Great analysis and I 100% agree!

    Reply
  156. Odais said on March 21st, 2010 at 8:22 pm

    Despite of all bad reviews that Jen received for her latest Movie “The Bounty Hunter” and all the hate that tabloids and websites like Perez Hilton, Now mag, laineygossip.com, imnotobsessed and others spread about her, I found this:
    http://www.vancouversun.com/entertainment/movie-guide/bountiful+career+Jennifer+Aniston/2706736/story.html

    Excellent article that describes the effort of a brave, great, hardworker woman, who has overcome difficult times and she still is here!!!.

    Reply
  157. Mary said on March 21st, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    No way is Jolie over 40. I remember when Voight was promoting “The Champ” and he dragged his kids out for the premiere. She couldn’t have been more than 4 or 5 at the time and that was in ‘79.

    Reply
  158. Odais said on March 21st, 2010 at 8:34 pm

    One more thing about the article.

    Great radiograph of her career!!!

    Reply
  159. Odais said on March 21st, 2010 at 8:59 pm

    This woman hates Jen, too.

    http://www.bettyconfidential.com/

    Reply
  160. Leah said on March 21st, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    BSWeekly was the one who put the nasty reviews on their website for all to see.They never have done that for anyone else.Bonnie Fuller worked there as an editor.Despises Jennifer because she wrote the false engagement story about Jennifer and VV. Jen called her out on it. Since then it’s been a neverending saga of nasty articles about Jennifer.Fuller has another blog now.Still continues the hate for Jennifer.She went to the premiere and loved the movie.But today she has an article trashing Jennifer’s movie.She is so far up the Joliepitts’ asses it’s pathetic.

    Reply
  161. What The ... ? said on March 21st, 2010 at 11:21 pm

    Why is it that when there were no (or limited) pictures of the Brange twins it meant that something must be wrong with them (Alcohol Fetal Syndrome, Downs, Post-natal Drug Dependency etc – yes, those things have been suggested on this site)…and when there are photos, suddenly the twins are being ‘whored out”? You can’t have it both ways!

    Why is it that some people on this site want the kids taken away from their ‘unstable’ mother/father…yet state they are being raised by a truck load of nannies. If they are being raised by nannies what difference would it make taking them away from their parents?

    It seems you can also tell what kind of mother or father someone is and what they are like at home from some published photos? Wow, that’s a pretty good skill. I don’t think I could tell what someone is really like from a photo if I have never met them.

    And you can tell they are ‘acting’ when they are showing each other affection and you can tell they are ‘not acting’ and are bad parents when their children allegedly look unhappy. That’s pretty clever too.

    P.S. Just wondering…Keane, you have claimed you can make a child smile and happy within 3 minutes of meeting them – but can you do it when a bunch of screaming and yelling photographers with flashing light bulbs are in their face?

    Reply
  162. Kate said on March 21st, 2010 at 11:30 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I was looking at those pics of the twins, the ones where Knox is in the black trench coat looking pissed off, and Viv is in the Ivory white soc hat with her bottom lip pouting, remember those, they took them out for the day..well the hair sticking out of Vivs hat is the color they dyed Shiloh’s hair? Odd yes…only because Shiloh was a tow head at this age.. and up until about 6-8 months ago..so that got me thinking, I wonder if she dyed Shilohs hair to match the twins hair so they would all look more like siblings..cause we don’t believe she really gave birth to those twins..right? They are engineered in someway…they may be hers, or one of them, or one Brads but maybe not both?

    what do you think? look at those pics..makes sense doesn’t it, all this nonsense with Shi as deflection, she is very good at that.

    Reply
  163. Susie said on March 22nd, 2010 at 2:07 am

    oh gosh, I hope she`s not using Shiloh as a deflection for anything! That would truly be awful and a mean an abusive way to treat your child.

    Not sure if I believe about the twins being “engineerd“ or whatever though, seems a bit too far fetched.

    Reply
  164. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 22nd, 2010 at 8:46 am

    @Kate:

    Yes that is a good idea Kate and I think the one I that makes the most sense so far, are other guesses really do not. And as for Knox well I have to say after reading the article about her looking for a child with blonde hair and blue eyes and of slavic appearance in those orphanages in Russia and that she was a friend of the Russian president (or one of the ministers did it say?) who had facilitated it all for her and helped her to bypass the rule that westerners must adopt children with illnesses and disabilities first, I think he pulled some strings and got her that child and I don’t think he looks like their biological child at all. Viv I think was conceived using IVF and carried by a surrogate. Looking at the state of Jolie now and how bone-pickingly skinny and malnourished she looked (the thinning hair) even as far back as the Beowulf premiere, there is no way she would be healthy enough to carry another child. This is what I think has gone on with these children and yes I think the Shiloh business is deflection and to try to make her look more like the definitely not twins, Viv and Knox. By the way I have also realised that when she adopts children and can have a choice, she is always going for the most beautiful child. As that article says, she sees them as accessories. Look at pics of Zahara as a baby, she is stunning. Three guesses why Jolie picked her to tote around on her arm with her newly acquired pretty boy daddy Brad.

    Reply
  165. Lauren said on March 22nd, 2010 at 9:32 am

    @Lauren:
    As puffy as he did in the photos from the last couple of weeks, I mean. Noticeable difference, IMO.

    Reply
  166. Pattyanne said on March 22nd, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    Wonderful article stating the facts re Jen Aniston’s talents and career. She’s got star quality, and will most likely move into character roles as she ages ever so gracefully. There is a special quality about this celebrity that draws one in, she can spin a story and have you believe it is about your best friend, or sister, or close neighbor. Great find, thanks Odais@Odais:

    Reply
  167. Pattyanne said on March 22nd, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    I know those pictures Kate, and yes, Angie is definately manipulating the kids now, but why? To attempt to create a more believable story that they are indeed all parented by she and Brad? It’s very strange, also note that the recent photo of the gang going on a boat ride shows Shiloh still dressed like a boy, but in a feminine way now. All the others were wearing winter coats, including the body guards, however Shiloh wore a black and white Mime type shit, knee knockers, and a sweater tied around her neck by it’s sleeves. What gives ???@Kate:

    Reply
  168. Pattyanne said on March 22nd, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    OMG….shiRt, shiRt, not shit…lol@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  169. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 22nd, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    @What The … ?:

    I think the key “What the…?” is not to tote them around for the benefit of the cameras in the first place. Give them their privacy and respect the fact that they are very sensitive and delicate little emotional beings who can get hurt, f*cked up and damaged very, very easily and keep them away from that horrendous media attention that you so court yourself. Do not sell their pictures to the highest bidder, do not orchestrate photo opps and dress them up in clothes you have an endorsement deal for and take them to another store you have another deal for to line your pockets, and do not leak every detail of their lives to the press to flog your latest dud of a film. Keep their names and their faces out of the media spotlight and separate from your career (like Ewan MacGregor does, like Cate Blanchett does, like even Jude Law does for God’s sake) and try to make a buck on the strength of your talent alone. And if you can’t, take your sorry ass movie career and piss off home. So take that bit of advice to your client and tell them to use it.

    Oh and yes, I can make a child smile and laugh within three minutes of seeing them as a matter of fact, I’ve been doing it on a daily basis for the past five months or so. And not just any old child either, children with complex health conditions, difficult backgrounds and issues like ASD. I can do that because I was raised by an amazing family who put me and my needs before their’s in every way imaginable, giving me the best start in life that is humanly possible and a childhood that was perfectly happy in every way. I just pass on to the children I meet what was given to me and the response I get from them is written all over their faces every time. Tell me, what do you see written all over the faces of Brangelina’s children – happiness? Because it looks like despair to me. And if you think carrying on this conversation will be of any profit to you whatsoever, please do not hesitate to respond.

    Reply
  170. DogBlissYou said on March 22nd, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    Ian – Are you planning on coming up with a new story anytime soon?

    Reply
  171. jan/sa said on March 22nd, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    yes most parents and people that have empathy with a kid can make them smile and have fun even with a camera stuck in their face. but these two call the paps whenever they go out so that they look like this super mom and dad with their army of kids but the facts is they cannot control them with out the nannies. i have seen plenty of women handle more kids on their own than these two morons in a busy shopping centre. and even though i was a tomboy and had two brothers and a sports crazy father i never wanted to dress in boys clothes although i liked to wear pants and shorts and at that age i never picked my own cloths as my mom dressed us and what she said was word. children need discipline and direction as well as love a a stable home and friends outside the home to grow to be socialable and reasonable adults. well i hope when these two fly off to space and they meet some little green men that convince them to stay in space we will not have to see them for the next ten years.

    Reply
  172. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 22nd, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    @Susie:

    By “engineered” we don’t mean anything more complicated than one child being conceived by IVF and carried by a surrogate (as Nicole Kidman and SJP’s children were, it is hardly unusual these days) and the other being adopted to try to make them look like a matching pair. And I think using Shiloh to try to deflect from the non-twins is really the least drastic strategy they would employ to deal with this. This is serious stuff. They took $14 million from a publishing house for the exclusive shots of their “twins” and what they got was one child who, from the look of her, is probably a biological relation of Angelina’s – but not necessarily her daughter if you see what I’m saying – and another who was not only not their biological child or a twin, but possibly not even the same child as we are seeing in Brangelina’s publicity photos now. When you think about it it is absolutely obvious that there must have been a serious reason why those children were kept under wraps for such a long time. We had one photo of two differently-sized babies at a few weeks old, one of them well-disguised in hoods and with their faces to their publicity-hungry “parents’” bodies at 6 months and nothing until what, 18 or 20 months at that bizarre photo opp in Syria of all places, while the rest of the children are paraded around on a weekly basis? If people think there is nothing up with that situation then they really need their head’s checking. And add to that the whole fake Holly incident where they claimed someone was impersonating Angelina’s long time assistant and releasing fake details of the “twins’” birth to ET (even though the message came from Holly’s personal e-mail account and was sent to a journo who knew her personally), and you have a cover-up so obvious it really is screaming itself from the roof-tops. Here’s what I think: I think they had one baby by surrogate and borrowed another one from someone (quite possibly Holly) for those first two photoshoots. I think the child we are seeing over a year after the second of those two photoshoots is not the same child because it would have been impossible for them to pick a baby which they knew would grow up to look remotely like Shiloh and Viv. I think they adopted Knox from a Russian adoption agency like she first attempted in 2004 using her political contacts to bypass adoption laws in that shadiest of all shady political climates, the former USSR, and did their best to match him up to Viv (which was not very good). And I think that this is the big con that SR has been hinting at all along and I think that this is why he referred to Angelina as a thief. Remember the line “the biggest hoax since Rock Hudson and Doris Day” well I think it is more than just Brangelina’s fauxmance, I think it is their offspring, and I think this is why Angelina looks so worried and Brad had been turning to the drink. I have always thought this and the sight of Knox’s slavic-looking little face has done nothing to change that. JMO

    Reply
  173. Emerson said on March 22nd, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    Will someone please do a biobraphy of Angelina’s mother??? She seems like such a WHACK!!! Enjoy the link below.

    http://www.usmagazine.com/momsbabies/news/pic-shiloh-jolie-pitt-wears-a-gun-holster-2010223

    Reply
  174. Emerson said on March 22nd, 2010 at 3:24 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Do you really think Nicole used a surrogate? I remember a pic of her jogging and lifting her shirt up to wipe her face and there was a def baby bump and not a fake one…

    Reply
  175. Susie said on March 22nd, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Thanks for the insights Keane. “the big con that SR has been hinting at all along” – forgive my ignorance, but who is “SR”?

    Yeah it is peculiar, I was looking at pics of Angelina pregnant with the twins, and it was questionable. I saw her assistant Holly walking side by side with her, and that was questionable too. I know a lot of people point to how skinny her arms and stuff were while pregnant – and they were, but, by the same token they remained pretty skinny while she was pregnant with Shiloh too. Some women`s baby weight goes all to their belly, while some women`s spread all over.

    However, that being said, the whole thing is still very questionable….and in truth, I guess I wouldn`t put it past Angelina to to orchestrate such a thing either. Which is really, really sad when you think about it. Living a lie in a relationship is one thing, but living a lie such as the possibility of her twins is really down right pathetic. Why someone who already has so much going for her – money, fame, a good career, children – would feel the need to create such a lie to garner temporary attention…is beyond me. And how Brad could willingly go along with this…that for me, is a tough nut to crack. I can understand having your baby carried by surrogate and pretending to the contrary, but to adopt a second child and then pass it off as your own “twin”, is just down right stupid! Why even lie in the first place?

    It`s all pretty mysterious…I just hope that the truth comes out soon!! In the meantime, I will continue to scrutinize their photos along with everyone else here. :)

    Reply
  176. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 22nd, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @Emerson:

    100% – she can’t have/carry children I am pretty sure. There is one photo of her where she is obviously wearing a prosthetic and has her hand under her stomach to highlight it while posing for the cameras. (She did this as the press had started to comment on the fact that she didn’t look like she was pregnant). Michael K from DListed refers to Sunday Rose as “pillow baby” openly. I think the fact that she was carried by surrogate is pretty much common knowledge these days.

    Reply
  177. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 22nd, 2010 at 3:45 pm

    @Susie:

    I can’t answer that question other than to say she is well-known to be quite mental so when you look at it in the context of that it is not so unusual. Her concept of what is acceptable and what other people will consider acceptable are two very different things. Remember the public snogs with her brother and the “‘I’m so in love with my brother right now” oscar acceptance quote? How many people are crazy enough to think incest would be considered publically acceptable? Look at it in the context of this and it is not that crazy. As for why she did it it could be one of so many reasons. One is that she had already done the hook-up with the hottest man in the world thing for publicity, followed by the reproduce with the hottest man in the world thing for publicity, so the only thing that would have trumped that is twins. Another is she just did it for the money because twins obviously would garner twice as much revenue from picture deals as a single child would. Another is that she did fall pregnant and conceived twins through IVF as is common, but lost them and either already had the magazine deal in place and didn’t want to forfeit the cash or didn’t want people to know why she lost them or both. SR is Sugar Ray by the way, look back through old posts!

    Reply
  178. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 22nd, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    @What The … ?:

    Oh and a quick response to your other fallacious arguments:

    1) I have never thought the non-twins were kept hidden due to any issues they might have, I have always said it is because they are not twins and at least one of them isn’t Brangelina’s bio kid which is quite obvious now we have seen a few more of them.

    2) The difference is they would hopefully be given some adoptive parents who would love them, not just attend to their physical needs. Nannies are not paid to provide unconditional love to the children, that’s the parents’ job – which everyone knows so it was a bit of a stupid question really wasn’t it?

    3) Um, no, we can tell what kind of parents they are and whether they actually give a damn about each other from the sources who have spilled on them (check out Ian’s book for details), we don’t need pictorial evidence! Having said that, it is increasingly obvious from all photographic evidence that Brangelina hate each other and the children are miserable – call it confirmation if you will.

    So yes, in summary we are all pretty clever – what a bummer for you hey?

    Try again!

    Reply
  179. Lauren said on March 22nd, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    @What The … ?:
    For your reference:

    Set 1: http://photos.toofab.com/galleries/gwen_and_gavins_fab_family#tab=fab_bodies&id=13752
    Here is a picture of a normal family outing with celebrity parents. Please notice the normal activities carried out by the parents, which do not involve running around some “exotic” city in stylist-approved outfits and posing opulently at just the right moment and angle for the perfect shot. Feel free to flip through the rest of the shots and notice the regular behavior exhibited by the kids; the dancing and playing around with smiles on their faces. Also note that, whether you agree with the practice or not, the parents openly dye their child’s hair. No secrets there.

    Set 2: http://celebritybabies.people.com/2010/03/09/spotted-halle-berry-and-nahla-play-at-the-park/
    Direct your attention to the playful, happy demeanor of the child. No pained expression here. Observe the loving interaction between mother and child. There’s no indication of cajoling; nothing seems forced. Whenever you see picture of this family, the child isn’t strategically placed at the either parent’s side or in their arms to project an image. There aren’t any forced smiles with unexpressive eyes.

    I’ll admit, all of the commentary on Brangelina’s family photo shoots are ultimately speculation and opinion. They could very well be a happy family. But, IMO, there are far too many pictures and signs that indicate otherwise.

    Ps. Also for quick reference, Gwen Stefani is 40 and Halle Berry is 43. How old is Angie again?

    Pss. I’m sure we’ll be seeing some vast improvements in the family staged photos soon. Wouldn’t be surprised if I see Angie with a huge grin on her face pushing Shi and Z on swings. Meanwhile, Brad’s kicking a soccer ball around with Maddox. Still no sign of Pax.

    Reply
  180. mooki said on March 23rd, 2010 at 6:05 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    the rumor about Isabella Cruise is that she’s really David and Shelley Miscavige’s kid and Cruise adopted her.

    Connor is really the lovechild of Kidman and Lenny Kravitz (when they were briefly together)

    Reply
  181. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 8:29 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    look for the pic of her jogging, that’s the one that just seems like it could not possibly be staged, at least to my eyes…she was with a trainer, they stopped and she was wiping her head and the paps got her sideways…

    Reply
  182. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 8:33 am

    @mooki:
    whattttt?????? Who are David and shelley Miscavige??? Nicole and Lenny dated after the divorce in the early 2000’s, so no way that was his unless she had an affair during the marriage?? God, I want someone to write a book on Tom, a real investigative book, he is just way toooo much the freak!

    Reply
  183. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 8:41 am

    @What The … ?:
    I, too, can make any babies/children smile and giggle within 5 minutes of being around them. If you look at other Hollywood parents, Gwen Stefani, Jennifer Garner, Nicole Ritchie, etc., all of these children have paps follow them and take their pics as well, and surprise surprise, the parents aren’t the ones tipping the paps off…and every single one of these children, even the Beckhams, seem happy, seem like they are having a great time whether at the park or walking down the street. SO, you tell me why these children of two messed up, drug/alcohol addicted scum always seem eyes downcast and no smiles? It’s not a phenomonon that occurs just with the Jolie-Pitts, the paps find celebrity children everywhere, the only difference is that they are being raised by normal families, hell Britney’s kids even look more normal!

    Reply
  184. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 8:52 am

    Below is the link I am talking about and yes, she is very, very small in it, I think she was like 4 months pregnant at that time, but I just cannot think a big meal would make her puff out??? Plus she is a talk stick, no hips, no boobs, nada, that she carried very oddly…but that’s jmo…

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_2u-weN31BFs/R895VzJSBrI/AAAAAAAAAZQ/3GG85BrZfGY/s400/nicole-kidman-bump-revealed.jpg

    Reply
  185. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 10:30 am

    @Emerson:

    That’s true except the celebs would have tipped off the paps in those instances as well – Nicole Richie, Jen Garner, Victoria Beckham and Gwen Stefani are all prime offenders!

    Reply
  186. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 10:34 am

    @mooki:

    Where did you hear that Mooki – the bit about Kidman and Cruise’s adopted child being in reality the child of her and Lenny Kravitz. I mean, it’s not like that would be unusual, I think Suri is most likely the child of Holmes and Chris Klein so Cruise would have had form and his and Kidman’s relationship was obviously a fauxmance/open relationship style scenario, but I have never heard that before. Can you tell me where that came from?

    Reply
  187. guest123 said on March 23rd, 2010 at 10:34 am

    Hey Highness – what happened to the a lister’s love child being announced with the paternity suit in France ?? Another made up story ?

    Reply
  188. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 10:36 am

    @Emerson:

    Yeah have you seen the video of Tila Tequila where she is sticking out her belly for the cameras? I don’t think she’s pregnant either, but she looks bigger than that. I think Nicole is sticking out her tummy there and then deliberately putting her hand over it to draw attention to it as she did in later pics when she was padded with the very obvious looking pillow. I don’t think there is much doubt that Sunday Rose was carried by a surrogate.

    Reply
  189. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 10:38 am

    @guest123:

    Hey Mia – how about telling me who you REALLY are? Someone “much closer to me” you say? Someone I have “tangled with before” (sounds sexy!) who uses the exact same syntax and bizarre gaps before punctuation marks like Mia always does…. fascinating!

    Reply
  190. guest123 said on March 23rd, 2010 at 10:39 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    i’m sorry are you the owner of this blog……..cause thats who i was talking to …you pretentious OXFORD biotch

    Reply
  191. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:00 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    well, she had so many difficulties with her other pregnancies, so I wouldn’t be surprised, it just looked real to me….and I’m sure they used both their eggs/sperm as Sunday looks way too much like Keith and is fair like Nicole…

    Reply
  192. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:03 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    yes, but the point I’m making is that their kids at least look like they are having fun and that they love their parents as well :)

    Reply
  193. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:06 am

    SLAM Keane!!! wooohoooo at least I’m impressed if you went to Oxford :) Guest123 must have woken up on wrong side of bed today or at least is trying to deflect from actually answering questions??

    Reply
  194. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:08 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    wouldn’t we have seen pics of Nicole pregnant if she was Connor’s biological mother? I also have my doubts because I cannot see Lenny Kravatz walking away from a child and not having them in his life??

    Reply
  195. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:24 am

    @guest123:

    Um no Mia, but it doesn’t really matter who you were talking to – what matters is, I was talking to YOU – get it? If you’re going to post on this blog and put your nasty comments towards Ian out there then while this may come as a bit of a shock to you, you may get the odd comment back now and again. (Such a scandalous place this internet is isn’t it when you can’t just have a good old bitch at someone without being called out on it? Tsk, tsk what is the world coming to!). Oh and by the way that is OXFORD GRADUATE to you bitch – I am not in fact from Oxford as your grammatical construction would suggest. And seriously Mia knowing what the word “syntax” means does not make someone “pretentious” come on now! That is a pretty commonly used term which most of our good readers and posters here would know well. Do try to keep up! Oh and, by the way, who are you again? Lol

    Reply
  196. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:31 am

    @Emerson:

    You can disguise these things though – pregnancy often isn’t that noticeable until the last 4-5 months and they could have easily hidden her away for this time. Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise are not the sort of people who do pap shots on a weekly basis. And it is highly possible that Lenny Kravitz does have a relatiosnhip with the child, it’s just that we don’t know about it. Those kids’ lives have been kept very hush, hush, we don’t know much about them at all, which is odd when you consider how much Suri is pimped out on a daily basis – maybe there is a bio father behind the scenes dictating the terms? I can definitely see a celeb agreeing to keep quiet about a lovechild with someone to save the mother’s reputation and career and not have their own private life dragged through the press. We did see pics of Lenny hanging out with Nicole and children a few years ago when she split from Tom – supposedly they were dating but maybe they were in fact seeing each other in a more co-parenting capacity – who knows? Have to say though I have never heard this rumour before so have no idea how valid it is but it would make one or two things fall into place for me – hm – interesting!

    Reply
  197. mooki said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:36 am

    @Emerson:

    David Miscavige is the current head of the Co$

    Nicole and Lenny dated briefly in the mid 90s and dated again in 2000

    Reply
  198. guest123 said on March 23rd, 2010 at 11:43 am

    @Emerson:
    why would i answer the Cyber Mean’s questions – she is of no consequence to me….this is not HER Blog – unless she’s actually Ian …..i was asking Ian…where is the story because the only thing keeping this blog going that i can see is the Dull Gang

    Reply
  199. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    @guest123:

    Well it seems like you just can’t stop talking to me right now sweetheart so you tell me! Or just let me respond to that question with another question: why the hell should Ian bother responding to a nasty little cyber troll like you? You are not a valued poster on this board, why should he even deign to wipe his ass with you? Well, just as we all might have guessed, he shouldn’t, and he won’t – so I would keep on amusing yourself with the “Dull Gang” if I were you d because it’s about the best you’re ever going to get? By the way, I thought you vowed to never come back to these parts again? We were sure as hell pleased to see the back of you back then and thought our little bit of pest control had done the job – tell me, do we need to lay more traps? Oh and by the way d, being a disgusting little troll posting on IUC does not in any way make you “close” to me – you utter loser!

    Reply
  200. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    @mooki:

    Oh that’s interesting, I had forgotten about that. Putting that together with something else I know about Kidman I would make the assumption that her type is black/mixed race guys then – interesting!

    Reply
  201. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    @mooki:
    interesting, I did not know that?? How did you find that out?

    Reply
  202. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    @guest123:
    if we are so dull, why waste your time? I was referring to your comment on Keane “pretentious Oxford biotch” Now, now, no need for name calling, I am sure you have FAR more important things to do in your little World than to slam anyone on this blog? If there is something you are not happy with on here, then find another blog, or better yet, start your own! OR, Perez always needs flukies to read his garbage…there I just gave you a few ideas so that you can lower your blood pressure, and not get all agitated at where this blog is going….anyone else have any suggestions??

    Reply
  203. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    what else do you know about Nicole?

    Reply
  204. guest123 said on March 23rd, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    fail again Keane…..not Mia and not d ……keep guessing sunshine

    Reply
  205. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 1:41 pm

    @guest123:

    Nah d, I think I am right this time – I remember the insidiously nasty snidey tone! There, there, now I remembered you you can go and have a night of pleasuring yourself over your moment of recognition! Or if you’re someone else, well who really gives an eff? Sorry sweetheart, I’m sure this has been the story of your life!

    Reply
  206. lurkeyloo said on March 23rd, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    Did anyone see the picture of Brad and Tom Ford posted over at Dlisted? Brad looks BEAT!

    Reply
  207. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    @Emerson:

    Oh it’s no big deal, just a personal anecdote someone told me about her and her behaviour towards another celeb. I thought it was odd at the time, but now I know she dated Lenny Kravitz and possibly had a child with him (?!?) then it kind of figures!

    Reply
  208. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    then how does Tom always get the children? I just cannot fathom that at all, did he blackmail her and then keep Conner with him? I am so not a Tom C fan and personally find him to be well gross, so I cannot imagine how he kept Nicole’s child??

    Reply
  209. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @Emerson:

    Well the story on that is that the stuff they have in her audits is damaging to her and they are blackmailing her with it. Presumably about the fact that she is bi and has taken or still takes drugs – which would be standard for HW. But maybe there’s worse who knows? Maybe there is something criminal which she confessed to which is being held over her? I can genuinely not think of any other reason why she would do this unless she was never really a mother to them in the first place, that that was just the front for the benefit of the press. I have no idea where these children came from but assuming they are both as they say they are, adopted, maybe the deal was that she would pretend to be their mother for the benefit of the media in return for the career boost that being Tom’s wife would get her and he would get his new two sciento recruits to carry on his mission. Sadly I think the last part was probably a big factor in their acquisition full stop really. Sad.

    Reply
  210. Emerson said on March 23rd, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    GOd, I just cannot in a million years imagine Nicole doing drugs, maybe being bi, or into some type of kinky sex like bondage, but drugs? Cannot imagine…UGG and everyone I have ever seen connected with the church of Scientology is a MESS!!! Look at Kirstie Alley, ummmm, how much weight can she possibly gain, look at John Travolta, closeted gay afraid to come out because of what is on his audit, Leah Remini is just weird, lol, and Tom C, well, I could go on and on about his whackness, and how many more stars are out there mixed up with that whack church? I use the word church loosely indeed…

    Reply
  211. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @Emerson:

    Your not around from these parts are you? Lol EVERYONE in HW does drugs, it’s like having a fag or some chips with your drink. Everyone outside of HW does it too, trust me on this!

    Reply
  212. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 23rd, 2010 at 5:15 pm

    @mooki:

    Hey Mooki that link doesn’t work for me – I think Angie has had my ISP number banned from that site(!) – can you copy and paste it for me please?

    Also, can I just ask who the blimming hell those children are supposed to be on the balcony in Venice? The boy looks nothing like the Russian-looking one we saw the other day – he looks like a male version of the child we all thought was Shiloh the other day (unless it really is Shiloh?) and Viv looks like a different child too. What in the blinking hell are they doing with these children, they all look different!

    Reply
  213. Lauren said on March 23rd, 2010 at 9:02 pm

    @mooki:
    Huh, I’d never heard of Nicole dating Lenny prior to her divorce from Tom. IDK, that may be true but I really can’t see Connor actually being hers. Just something about that doesn’t feel right. But you’re waaaaay more of an expert than me.

    And I know I’ve commented on how horribly Angie is aging, but that picture is perhaps the worst I’ve ever seen of her. Is it the lighting or the pose. She honestly looks like she’s in her 50s. Again I’ll state, Gwen Stefani=40, Halle Berry=43, hell Vanessa Paradis=37. They all look younger than Angie by at least 10 years.

    Reply
  214. guest123 said on March 24th, 2010 at 7:21 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    and yet you keep addressing my comments……oh wait that’s right its a compulsion with you to always have the last word. my questions were to the owner of the blog – as to why he puts up stories that “are developing” or “breaking” and then NOTHING more ever happens ?? And please don’t tell me I’m the only one questioning why .

    Reply
  215. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Hey Lauren

    I just don’t believe she is actually 34 (or is it 35 now that she’s supposed to be?) to be honest. I mean that’s only a few years older than me and people usually assume I’m in my late 20’s and I have not had any work done whatsoever! Angelina has been having work done for years, if you look back at her at the Mr and Mrs Smith premiere where she was supposed to be about 28 or 29 she had clearly had a face-lift then (check out the video of her at the premiere in the leather dress, it is obvious her face has been cut and lifted). Even for a heavy drug user like Angelina that is some serious face work for someone of her supposed age. It would be great if we could try and find some actual evidence of her birth date through newspaper coverage or the age she claimed to be while at events with Voight etc – it would be interesting to establish what can actually be proved about that because I’d be stunned if she was really only in her mid 30’s. It is total standard practice for actors/musicians to shave off a lot of years from their real age at the start of their careers, can’t believe Ange wouldn’t have been wiley enough to do that too considering her HW lineage. Even my beloved Florence Welch is clearly doing it right now which is being remarked upon by everyone. She is saying she is 23, more like my age!

    Reply
  216. keane cyber queen supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 7:56 am

    Although I have to say I think the real story now that we should be focussing on has to be the twins – it is clearly the big fraud and the big cover up that has been flagged up on this site for such a long time now. Let’s not do what they want us to do and talk about everything other than the twins. I’m beginning to wonder whether even the NOTW story and the resultant threat of legal action from the Brange may just have been a set-up to deflect attention from that. Or whether it was a big set-up with Murdoch to warn other publications not to try to damage the product (Angelina) which is the only thing that might sell his turkey of a movie, Salt. If Fox produced Salt there is no way on earth that I can see that he would want to damage the only thing that could get bums on seats and make the production costs back. I wonder which one of those explanations is the right one I wonder?

    By the way I was interested to see the other night that Brad Pitt was one of the producers of The Departed. I assume that means he raised some money for it? Brad sure has a lot of fingers in a lot of pies hey? A lot more than Angelina has, that’s for sure!

    Reply
  217. Tamara said on March 24th, 2010 at 7:56 am

    Morning all! Wow, can’t believe this story is still up!! Has Ian gone MIA – just like last year, Im having deja vu! lol

    Reply
  218. Emerson said on March 24th, 2010 at 8:00 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    LMAO, actually I come from a family of 6, of which only 1 (me) turned out not to be an addict, and the humble little town I come from of 6,000 has a BIG time heroin problem brought in from NYC and Philly, so I’m not as naive, however, call me Pollyanna, haha, as I just wish that stars actually were normal and not freaks! I promise to awake from my blurry vision soon..

    Reply
  219. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    @guest123:

    Nope not really d, problem here for you and those of your ilk who I thought we had finally got rid of (you were always someone who I was particularly keen to never see here again as you are a vicious, underhand vile little person who I can but pity) is that you want to have something you can’t have: the freedom to post nasty, insidious little comments against Ian without fear of being called out on it or responded to by anyone who is a friend of his or who supports him. No I don’t own this blog, no I am not Ian, but I am a friend and supporter of Ian. Likewise Ian, I think you’ll find, has also said nice things about me. Kate and I are not moderators on this board no, but as Ian has said, we did get this board started and if he did have a problem with the things we have said in defence of him and against people like you, he has never said so in the private communication we have with him. I know that you have always felt that the loss of comments from people such as yourself is detrimental to this board but on the contrary it is quite the opposite. We are happy that we don’t have vile, hate-filled messages, personal attacks or lunatic theories that undermine any rationaol theory that might be posted here. If Ian wants to change the tone of this board to include those sort of comments then he can always ask Kate and I to stop posting and invite you all back in your droves. The ball really is in his court with regard to this but until then I will continue to say exactly what I please in response to your posts and you can continue to whine at me and call me an “Oxford biotch” (God knows what that is) like the little school girl playground bully that you are. Or ideally you will do what you promised to do (yet have obviously spectacularly failed to do as you have in fact been posting as guest123 all this time) and go away and never comment on this board ever again. And yet you just can’t do that can you even though you are really not wanted? I hope for better things for you in your life one day than this d, all the best.

    Reply
  220. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on March 24th, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    @Emerson:

    Wow, now that’s a story! Everyone has one! And I hear you about drugs problems in small towns and in the country. I come from a rural idyll where this is nothing to do so drug-use is rife – HW has nothing on the sticks!

    Reply
  221. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 1:54 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  222. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , viagra , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  223. viagra said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cheap cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  224. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  225. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  226. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cheap viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  227. buy_cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  228. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 4:16 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra , cheap viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  229. cheap_cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , viagra , cheap cialis , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  230. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , buy cialis , viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  231. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 9:00 pm

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  232. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 9:01 pm

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  233. cialis said on March 24th, 2010 at 9:01 pm

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  234. buy_cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 1:56 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cheap viagra , cheap cialis , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  235. viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:20 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  236. cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:01 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  237. cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 4:00 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  238. cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 4:26 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap viagra , cheap cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  239. viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 5:06 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  240. buy_cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 9:08 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis ,

    Reply
  241. cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 9:09 am

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  242. viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 9:09 am

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  243. buy_cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , viagra , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  244. alif said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    On his show, Dr.Phil discussed the danger of prescripiton drugs. He did a seg on Corey Haim and briefly mentioned other famous victims.
    Main guests were teenagers who reported on this problem concerning their peer group. It is widespread, to say the least!
    My take is that young people are heavily influenced by stars of whatever. They tend to emulate these people. So when Mr. and Mrs. Star are reported to be heavy drug abusers, the young who are not taught right and wrong from childhood; and how to deal with peer pressure, are easily victimized.
    JMO!

    Reply
  245. viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , buy cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  246. viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  247. cheap_cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , viagra , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  248. cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cialis , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  249. cheap_viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    Hello!
    cheap viagra , cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  250. cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , viagra , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  251. viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  252. buy_cialis said on March 25th, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  253. cheap_viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    Hello!
    cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  254. cheap_viagra said on March 25th, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    Hello!
    cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  255. alif said on March 25th, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    I, for one, learned from the deceased stars misfortune regarding prescription drugs. In a way, it’s like the dictum which new doctors are taught early on: THE DEAD TEACH THE LIVING!
    And so they do!

    Reply
  256. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 1:50 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  257. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:10 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , cheap viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  258. buy_cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:49 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  259. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:09 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cheap viagra , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  260. alif said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:19 am

    On another site, I read that Dennis Hopper is on his death bed. It was expected eventuallly, of course.
    Now, there’s an icon for sure. He worked with many of the greats, including Marlon Brando and James Dean.
    His last big hit was “Blue Velvet” if I’m not mistaken!

    Oh, the stories he could have told, eh?

    Reply
  261. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:30 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  262. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:50 am

    Hello!
    viagra , buy cialis , cheap viagra , viagra , viagra ,

    Reply
  263. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:10 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cialis , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  264. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:29 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  265. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:49 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  266. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 5:08 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cheap cialis , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  267. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:12 am

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  268. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:12 am

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  269. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:13 am

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  270. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  271. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:29 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  272. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  273. buy_cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , viagra , buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  274. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis , viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  275. cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  276. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  277. buy_cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , viagra , viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  278. cheap_cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , viagra , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  279. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  280. viagra said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  281. buy_cialis said on March 26th, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis ,

    Reply
  282. alif said on March 27th, 2010 at 1:05 am

    R.I.P. Corey Haim.

    Reply
  283. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 2:09 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , viagra , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  284. cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 2:30 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  285. viagra said on March 27th, 2010 at 2:50 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , viagra , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  286. cheap_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 3:11 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , viagra , cheap cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  287. cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 3:31 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  288. cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 3:50 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cheap cialis , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  289. cheap_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 4:11 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  290. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 4:31 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  291. cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 4:51 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , viagra , cheap cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  292. cheap_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:03 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  293. cheap_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:03 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  294. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  295. alif said on March 27th, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    From the 1960’s says my friend: “Today Is the First Day of the Rest of Your Life!”

    Reply
  296. cheap_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  297. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  298. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  299. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  300. buy said on March 27th, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  301. cheap_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  302. cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis , cheap cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  303. cheap_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  304. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis ,

    Reply
  305. buy_cialis said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis ,

    Reply
  306. buy said on March 27th, 2010 at 9:16 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis ,

    Reply
  307. alif said on March 27th, 2010 at 11:11 pm

    Time is fleeting! Hope we will remember Corey Haim.

    Reply
  308. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:10 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  309. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:29 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  310. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:48 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  311. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:06 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  312. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:25 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  313. buy_cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:43 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  314. cheap_cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:02 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  315. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:21 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  316. buy said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:40 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  317. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:58 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  318. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 9:06 am

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  319. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 9:06 am

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  320. buy_cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  321. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  322. cheap_cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , buy cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  323. buy_cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  324. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  325. buy said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  326. alif said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Spring has sprung! Beautiful Day!

    Reply
  327. buy_cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  328. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  329. buy said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  330. cialis said on March 28th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  331. alif said on March 28th, 2010 at 5:13 pm

    Ian, this is a great thread! Lots of info! Good on ya!

    Reply
  332. cheap_cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:01 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , buy cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  333. cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:23 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  334. alif said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:40 am

    Full moon, tonight. Beautiful!

    OT: Oh, we just lost one of the great voices of rock, imo!
    Johnny Maestro was an outstanding vocalist. If you can, I urge you to check his “Unchained Melody” on youtube. The arrangement is similar to Bobby Hatfield’s; but oh how his voice soars!

    Reply
  335. buy_cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:44 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  336. cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:06 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , ,

    Reply
  337. cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:28 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , ,

    Reply
  338. buy_cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:49 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis , ,

    Reply
  339. cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 4:32 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cialis , ,

    Reply
  340. cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 4:53 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , cialis , ,

    Reply
  341. alif said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    And now we come to the greatest week of the year!
    May all have a good one!

    Reply
  342. buy_viagra said on March 29th, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    Hello!
    buy viagra , cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  343. cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:39 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic cialis , buy cialis , viagra online , cialis ,

    Reply
  344. buy_cialis said on March 29th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis , cheapest cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  345. viagra_online said on March 29th, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    Hello!
    viagra online , buy cialis , cialis , viagra , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  346. menshealth said on April 1st, 2010 at 11:58 am

    Hello!
    menshealth , pharmacy , menshealth , erection , erection ,

    Reply
  347. menshealth said on April 1st, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    Hello!
    menshealth , tamiflu , pharmacy , menshealth , health ,

    Reply
  348. menshealth said on April 3rd, 2010 at 3:38 am

    Hello!
    menshealth , pharmacy , aspirin , aspirin , menshealth ,

    Reply
  349. viagra said on April 5th, 2010 at 10:06 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cheapest cialis , generic viagra , ,

    Reply
  350. buy_cialis said on April 6th, 2010 at 11:21 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , generic viagra , ,

    Reply
  351. cialis said on April 6th, 2010 at 11:43 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheapest cialis , cialis , generic viagra , ,

    Reply
  352. jayjay84 said on April 7th, 2010 at 8:05 pm

    Who could this be

    Reply
  353. Joe64 said on April 7th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    Who could this be

    Reply
  354. cialis said on April 12th, 2010 at 9:58 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy viagra , cialis , cheap cialis , buy viagra ,

    Reply
  355. cialis said on April 14th, 2010 at 11:21 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  356. cialis said on April 26th, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , buy viagra , viagra , cialis , ,

    Reply
  357. tamiflu said on April 28th, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    Hello!
    tamiflu , menshealth , menshealth , aspirin , health ,

    Reply
  358. erection said on April 28th, 2010 at 10:43 pm

    Hello!
    erection , health , health , tamiflu , tamiflu ,

    Reply
  359. health said on April 29th, 2010 at 5:20 am

    Hello!
    health ,

    Reply
  360. health said on April 29th, 2010 at 5:21 am

    Hello!
    health ,

    Reply
  361. health said on April 29th, 2010 at 5:22 am

    Hello!
    health ,

    Reply
  362. pharmacy said on April 29th, 2010 at 9:05 am

    Hello!
    pharmacy , tamiflu , erection , health , tamiflu ,

    Reply
  363. health said on April 29th, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    Hello!
    health , health , pharmacy , erection , tamiflu ,

    Reply
  364. hair said on May 5th, 2010 at 11:50 am

    Hello!
    hair , jeep , celebtity , iphone , health ,

    Reply
  365. celebtity said on May 7th, 2010 at 2:11 am

    Hello!
    celebtity ,

    Reply
  366. celebtity said on May 7th, 2010 at 2:12 am

    Hello!
    celebtity ,

    Reply
  367. health said on May 8th, 2010 at 9:35 am

    Hello!
    health , pills , hair , iphone , health ,

    Reply
  368. hair said on May 8th, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    Hello!
    hair , celebtity , apple , iphone , bath ,

    Reply
  369. health said on May 9th, 2010 at 12:01 am

    Hello!
    health , hair , apple , pills , hair ,

    Reply
  370. hair said on May 9th, 2010 at 4:18 am

    Hello!
    hair , bath , iphone , bath , ipod ,

    Reply
  371. health said on May 9th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    Hello!
    health , pills , ipod , hair , hair ,

    Reply
  372. health said on May 10th, 2010 at 4:11 am

    Hello!
    health , iphone , apple , jeep , apple ,

    Reply
  373. celebtity said on May 10th, 2010 at 5:47 am

    Hello!
    celebtity , hair , health , iphone , celebtity ,

    Reply
  374. health said on May 10th, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    Hello!
    health , ipod , ipod , health , celebtity ,

    Reply
  375. Jaylene Hake said on November 29th, 2012 at 3:39 pm

    @Tamara: Go ahead, ask me about the connection betwixt “Alice in Wonderland” and Freemasonry…

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Meta