IUC Exclusive: Angie Wants More Kids, according to close friend

Posted on February 18th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

angiebreastA close friend of the actress told IUC that Angie wants to have “at least four more kids”. With such a jam packed schedule making movies, does Angie really have time to look after 10 kids? Let us know…

  1. Debbie said on February 18th, 2010 at 1:35 am

    I pray this is wrong.

    Reply
  2. JinxieGal said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:49 am

    ThIs child collecting really does need to stop.

    I do understand the arguement that there are children in the world who need saving from their environment but adoption into that family is not the better option. Local support and help is.

    These two have work schedules and lifestyles which mean they can not give the proper time, attention and support to the children they already have. Surely any right minded adoption agency would refuse them?

    If she means biological children then I am not sure she seems healthy enough to conceive. But I suppose we all thought that of her last time.

    Reply
  3. Kate said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:23 am

    Does she have time, sure she does, her idol Josephine Baker did it. She can hire nannies, can she attend to them the way we would, no, but I doubt that is her is intent, rather more a headmistress.

    The real question is, with whom does she want 4 more, because we know she and Brad are done?

    So what do you say IAN, who would daddy be? and what is happening with the phantom lawsuit?

    Reply
  4. StatingMyOpinion said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:43 am

    Angelina “wants”, even at the total disregard of how it would not only affect those 6 kids already, but the new child itself.

    Sure they can give a child anything materialistic. But they have proven time and time again, they will not give their children a stable environment. They travel every few months to here, there and back again. Those kids do not know the moment they are going to have to pack up and move again. This isn’t healthy for any child. They don’t go to school, they don’t have friends, they are left with nannies or bodyguards, most of the time. The only outings these kids have, is when Mommy wants to be photographed, OR they both need some positive PR, and they take them out, for a PR photo-shoot of the “family outing”.

    Reply
  5. cara said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:29 am

    somebody on jj posted a link where Ian `s book can be read, but it doesn`t work, or i don`t know how to make it work…help???…..

    Reply
  6. marty said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:42 am

    @cara:
    From that website, I doubt they will want it to work dear.. but keep trying or better yet, ask Ian. He should make his book available to people who can’t buy it. Or make it cheaper..

    Reply
  7. ooops said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:48 am

    Interesting!!!!! four kids AT LEAST.She is a cray bitch who would do anything to be noticed .I’m sorry for the kids who are like toys more than kids she used them to clean her image .It’s interesting Ian you didn’t put Brad’s name or said Brangelina did you mean she will have those kids alone after the announcement of the breakup or with another poor victim .

    Reply
  8. Reality Check said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:51 am

    @cara:

    You can read the first six pages of Ian’s book on Amazon, but I don’t think there is a website that will offer you the complete book – that would be a grave violation of copyright.

    The Amazon link is below – when you open the page, just click on the cover photo with the caption “Click to look inside!” and you’ll get the excerpt:

    http://www.amazon.com/Brangelina-Untold-Story-Angelina-Jolie/dp/0981239668

    Does anybody here think that someone may have scanned and uploaded Ian’s book on the Internet to kill the sales? Hmmmm … (A bit of head scratching here.)

    Reply
  9. marty said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:53 am

    In a normal household in the US, a Children of Department Services agent will make a visit to any parent suspected of negligence to a child, regardless of income situation. They have cases where one of the parents is a very well rich person but at the same time is a pedophile or a danger to his children so the department steps in. Now I don’t know why they do anything about this family when the evidece is clear, right on front of their noses. Children allow to stay with a parent that’s a confirmed pot smoker, who travels a lot, who drinks too much and mother is a sex maniac, multiple partner obssesed, never home either, with a heroine use background and a pathological lier will grow to be disturbed adults. That’s for sure and the department will get as many lawsuits in the future from these children and their lawyers, so they should better act now.
    ..from a concerned citizen,

    Reply
  10. cara said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:03 am

    @Reality Check:
    thank you kindly , and to marty ….you`re right, if i don`t have a copy, i don`t want to read it…and i made a mistake, it wasn`t the whole book, just a chapter….but i`m ok, i enjoy reading your opinions, all of you, about the matter….
    i really like your point of view and your logic……sorry if i don`t speak corectly, english is not my first language…

    Reply
  11. Tamara said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:15 am

    @marty:
    I know, its so strange isn’t it? And lets not forget the fact that they aren’t in school!

    Reply
  12. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:52 am

    hence her blabbing on CNN that she wants to adopt from Haiti after “goodwill” visit and her dumping $$$. every word she or her pr team puts out is making me cringe

    Reply
  13. joanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 7:16 am

    Of course she wants more kids. Octomom, The Gosslins and Duggars are winning the race of hoing out the kids. Will America let her buy more kids when the ones she has don’t look happy? She has enough money so probably, I don’t understand why they don’t let other gay or drug using alcoholic couples adopt too ( not enough money I guess). It this was anyone else they wouldn’t be allowed to adopt and they would have had the kids taken off them. I wonder if Pitt knows by keeping up this charade he lost his star quality. He done stayed to long. Poor sop. Miss Voight needs to fix her falling face. Please Jolie, try something different for once.

    Reply
  14. Tamara said on February 18th, 2010 at 7:46 am

    @joanne:
    LOL – I know what the eff is up with her neck? Anyway, she doesn’t buy her kids from the US most likely because she would never pass the strictures of the adoption process, and…she doesn’t want to have to wait two or more years, she wants to go shopping in a 3rd world country, offer up all kinds of promises to build schools and improve conditions etc which by the way I have never ever seen any progress reports on how that’s working out in Cambodia or Namibia – but anyway she wants to go shopping, pick out her child, have it put in a bag and delivered to her hotel later that day. Then she can wear the child on her arm that night for a nice photo op!

    Reply
  15. keane cyber queen supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 7:52 am

    I think we all know what my opinion on her adopting more children is so no need to restate here. If Angelina wants to go ahead and try to adopt more children when she can’t/doesn’t look after the ones she has she can if she likes, it will kill her career. If her people are trying to test public reaction to the prospect of her adopting more kids to improve her popularity, let me help them out here by saying: negative, it won’t work, it will only worsen the situation. Oh and destroy a few more children’s lives into the bargain. Maybe they could pause for a second to think about that too. Children are not PR pawns James and Geyer, they are highly vulnerable young human beings. What you have been doing to keep your product afloat is disgusting, as are the two of you. No more children Angelina, otherwise there will be trouble.

    Reply
  16. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 8:29 am

    the Tomb Raider sequel (’03) was on AMC last night and I completely forgot that Gerard Butler was in w/ Angie. hmmm… makes me wonder about how much she really knows Jen Aniston.

    Reply
  17. Lizzy said on February 18th, 2010 at 8:58 am

    @mooki:
    I noticed that too – which also explains that Butler quote about how beautiful Jolie is. He was talking about her back in ‘03 when she was still crazy Angelina – not now – haggard old lady. I doubt he would be saying the same thing now!!!

    Reply
  18. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 9:28 am

    Jolie collects one thing only – Press Releases. The children are tools which enable her to receive more free publicity to enhance her Mother Earth personna which is what she truly loves. Brad Pitt was a stepping stone to open HW doors formerly closed to the crazy blood vial wearing biotch of Jon Voight’s, and nothing more. Ergo he garnered Jolie even more press opportunities to further her ego. Humanitarian acts? When? Where?, Oh, you mean more press releases showing Jolie acting like Mother Theresa? Yea, right. A performance only. A true humanitarian does not alert the press to show up for photo shoots of the charitable event, they give quietly from the heart. How many celebs flew in plane loads of doctors, nurses, foods, medicines, clothing and cash to Haiti? What did Jolie fly in? Herself and a dozen paps. All those false claims of high intelligence are so misleading also….Jolie is an extremely adept manipulator into creating the image she wants to be she, and making people think it’s fact when it is not. Pure Sociopath. Brad Pitt’s Karma is that he is now tied to this crazy ho until SHE wishes it to be otherwise. I do believe she is holding his deepest, darkest secret over his head to control him. Now what could that be? Perhaps goes way back to his early days? Ian needs to do some research on Brad Pitt and write another tell all imo.

    Reply
  19. Emerson said on February 18th, 2010 at 9:30 am

    I think she needs to revisit the crazy house for an extended stay….God, those kids don’t stand a chance with a loony for one parent and a doper for another…dear God, let the World say no to more adoptions! I think she thinks more and more children will “cure” her, will fill that “whacked out” space that everyone can see, clearly, except for Angelina….yes, Geyer should be ashamed of himself! Knowing all of her demons are obviouslly still out there for everyone to see, and yet, who is there to say NO to this whack? Mental issues…got it! Drug problems…got it! Adulterer…got it! YEAH let’s add more kids to the mix!!! wooweee, kiddies hop on, it’s gonna be a bumpy ride!!

    Reply
  20. Emerson said on February 18th, 2010 at 10:36 am

    @Pattyanne:
    wow you got that right, I want to see those secrets…obviouslly why he’s drinking/smoking too much now and she IS a sociopath! They all have a false sense of high intelligence….

    Reply
  21. lory said on February 18th, 2010 at 10:48 am

    Why would a CLOSE FRIEND even talk to you Ian? That dioesn`t make sense! NOONE who has read what you accused her of would talk a single word with you Ian. Damm it even her worst enemy would have higher standards then that!

    Reply
  22. Reality Check said on February 18th, 2010 at 11:47 am

    @lory:

    Easy, easy, girl, or you’ll get a heart attack before your 30th birthday. You are preaching to the deaf here, so you risk straining yourself at a very tender age. Ian will not answer your questions. We will make fun of them (as per usual) and we won’t even help you feel important by considering your comment to be abuse of any kind – we’ve seen much worse over the last five years when we just tried to call a spade a spade.

    When this whole debate started, we all thought Jolie’s wrongdoing was too obvious to help her get anywhere, but soon we got surprised by how many idiots could see anything romantic or heroic about a mere slut with long history, who doesn’t mind flaunting her affair and getting pregnant with the child of someone who wouldn’t even be divorced for year after that. Anyway, it is possible thanks to the idiots like you.

    Is that the role model you are willing to die for on the Internet? If that’s the kind of person you want to measure yourself up against, all I can say is you’re the one who has no moral standards at all. Now go adore your favourite humanitarian whore in front of the poster in your room or follow in her footsteps and look around for someone unavailable to make you feel better about yourself.

    Reply
  23. Lizzy said on February 18th, 2010 at 11:50 am

    Perez just posted new pictures of “Knox” – I’m not convinced – has the same missing tooth as Shiloh and does not look 1!!! I think it might be Shiloh in a disguise so they can keep hiding the twins longer….

    Reply
  24. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    @lory:

    Oh good Mia, have you come back to answer the questions you avoided re: not knowing the UNHCR was part of the UN, when you last met a president and for what reason, and to try to write off why I last met one as “just Bill supporting his daughter’s fellow students” again? I have so been looking forward to hearing what you were going to come back with! Unlike you to run away from an opportunity to tell us all why you know everything about everything and we are all so stupid and naive! I look forward to hearing your response.

    Oh and re: this post. This is just a leak from her PR team IMO designed to distract from the real story as always. Yeah, maybe Angelina does want to adopt another four kids, I would like to fly to the moon, doesn’t mean I’m going to do it! We keep hearing a lot about “poor Angie wanting to leave LA and take the kids to some new country” and “poor Angie wanting to adopt tonnes more children”, when all poor Angie really wants is for us all to stop talking about the actual things that are going on in her life and the dreadful, dreadful way in which she treats everyone including her own children. Let’s not rise to it shall we. My opinion on Angelina adopting more children: nada, cos it ain’t going to happen!

    Reply
  25. Jalyn said on February 18th, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    i don’t see how even his deepest darkest secret
    can keep him there….give up the whole rest of
    his life to keep a secret? i’d out it then move on,

    Reply
  26. Reality Check said on February 18th, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    @Lizzy:

    I think the kid in those pictures is Knox. Shiloh is much taller and her hair is blonder than that.

    I, for one, don’t think that Knox and Shiloh are the spitting image of Brad. Of course, they are similar to him but not in a way that’s too remarkable.

    Reply
  27. lurkeyloo said on February 18th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    Please someone shut this bitch down on adopting more kids!!!! And, WTF, is wrong with her face???? Could it be KARMA…finally reflecting on the outside what she is on the inside? Twisted and ugly.

    Reply
  28. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    @Jalyn:

    I think Brad is trying to keep both his career and his secrets. He has always had it his own way in life – why stop now? He thinks he’s untouchable which is very foolish.

    Reply
  29. Reality Check said on February 18th, 2010 at 12:55 pm

    Actually, the woman in the picture above is not Jolie. I have seen that picture before – it is a part of a photo shoot with two models who impersonated Pitt and Jolie for a magazine that claimed to have Shiloh’s first pictures ever. It was a very funny set of photos. I’m sorry that I don’t have the link to post it here.

    :)

    Reply
  30. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Most were direct quotes from Angelina Jolie herself Mia. Google some of the comments from Ian’s book, but be sure to READ the book so you have them exactly. And if you are truly interested in the truth and not in compiling a defense, check out the third page of Ian’s book Brangelina: The True Story for his list of acknowledgements for sources. Might take you a bit of time, but if you are truly interested, it would be well worth it.@lory:

    Reply
  31. Kate said on February 18th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    This sums up Angies ambition-like Josephine she headed to NYC as a teen JB about 15 or 16, same with AJ. Became known for their erotic nature. “despite her popularity in France she never obtained that same reputation in America” I think we can say Angie recognizes she is at that crossroads.

    If you are familiar with her, not even the enemy (the Nazi’s) wanted to hurt her back then, when she got involved in the resistance movement. She got involved in the underground, help out during the war, was rewarded with an award, ended up going to Africa, becoming more influenital too . It was at her request that Jewish people were helped with passports to get out of Nazi occupied Europe.

    On her parenting-

    “Although based in France, Baker supported the American Civil Rights Movement during the 1950s. She protested in her own way against racism, adopting 12 multi-ethnic orphans, who she called the “Rainbow Tribe.”[12] They were: Janot (Korean son), Akio (Japanese son), Luis (Colombian son), Jari (Finnish son), Jean-Claude (Canadian son), Moïse (French Jewish son), Brahim (Algerian son), Marianne (French daughter), Koffi (Ivorian son), Mara (Venezuelan son), Noël (French son), and Stellina (Moroccan daughter).”

    “For some time she lived with all of her children and an enormous staff in a castle, Château de Milandes, in Dordogne, France. Baker bore only one child, stillborn in 1941, an incident that precipitated an emergency hysterectomy.”

    There is a complete bio on her, one of her sons wrote one, claimed she was bisexual, he talks about six of her female loves, another eight or so male, that she was arrange them in a classroom style so when people came to visit the Chateau they could see how happy the Rainbow Tribe was, they also traveled with her as the little Jolie Pitt kids.

    She adopted 12 kids, in total, and believed that children of different ethnicity and religions could be brothers. TMZ did a story on this back in 2006. Early on in interview when Angie was asked who her hero was the reporter suggested it was Mother Teresa (I think) and and she laughed and said, no, “Josephine Baker” that was of course before the kids came. Once the stories started being put out that she was emulating her she became offended, and denied that she was creating a “Rainbow Tribe.” However, her adulation of Josephine started long before Maddox came along.

    When she died in 1975 she was given a 21 gun salute by the French, so I would imagine right now her life is somehow not going the way she planned. She changed partners many times btw with those 12 kids, and those kids were well traveled, until she went bankrupt .

    Angie has a plan.

    jmo and Bradley will not be the daddy, nor will the others have the name Pitt. She will have to make movies to support them, but she won’t stop adopting. It is what nourishes her.

    I have said this all before, and I still believe this is what she will do once they split.

    Angelina does not see herself as hands on mommy, but humanitarian activist mommy. She wants her 21 gun salute in the end, that adulation is what drives her.

    jmho of course. and I think she will achieve ..to a point.

    Reply
  32. Lizzy said on February 18th, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    @Kate:
    Wow that was actually facisnating and I’m sure only bits of information about Baker, whom I knew nothing about before. It seems Jolie already has her plan mapped out before her. I think her only slip up thus far is continuing with Brad. She sucked everything out of him that she needs and really should move on. Financially and for fame she has put a drain on Pitt that he will never be free from.

    IMO, once they split – because they will – I dont’ think Jolie sees a man next to her for life, I think she wants all the credit to herself. I believe that once they split Jolie will make plans to adopt again on her own – I can see it now, look how strong AJ is…moving on from dead beat dad Brad and continuing her family alone blah blah blah. Then she’ll choose a lover who will have something new to add – perhaps a politician or something other than an actor.

    Pitt I think would be wise to get out of the spotlight for awhile. Don’t play into the media games that Jolie will start, by not responding or being photographed people will lose interest quickly. This way he can re-emerge looking rested, hot, and can hopefully retain some of the status that he had pre-Jolie. A real stab would be to get photographed with Jen – NOW THAT would be incredible. That is the one thing Jolie cannot compete with.

    Reply
  33. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    http://www.usmagazine.com/healthylifestyle/news/doctors-explain-whats-wrong-with-angelina-jolies-face-2010182
    ———————————————
    Several plastic surgeons after looking at the recent photos of Angelina Jolie’s pertruding neck muscles, believe she has had 1) excessive Botox injections in that area , and 2) a minimumally invasive lower facelift. One only has to look at the photos to see that!

    Reply
  34. Kate said on February 18th, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    @Lizzy:
    I agree, she will adopt on her own, hook up with someone with some type of political base, whether it is as an activist, humanitarian, a real ambassador, someone who is a real mover and shaker that can get things done, has a say, connected somehow to what she feels is important. He will be older. Distinguished, maybe not even American, who knows, but she will keep her other lovers on the side like she always had. Yeah she has always had it mapped out, it just did not go the way she thought it would.

    next..lol of course it was just like that for JB too, and she kept on til it did. So will AJ.

    my prediction. Brad will go back to LA and to who he really is, and she will move forward with her plan, he probably will continue with his giving back, and I suspect he and Jen will always be good friends and be a formidable force in the movie industry. Jolie will use it to sustain what she really wants to achieve, and that will not be a “movie star of great status” lol

    Let’s check back in 4 years and see where she is. :)

    Reply
  35. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    @Kate:

    I’m sure you’re right but I think it’s a shame that Jolie cares more about what history says about her than being personally happy or being a good person in this life. She is not alone in this, I think Tony Blair had/has the exact same flaw in his personality i.e. a willingness to sacrifice anything or commit any act so his name will go down in the history books, but nonetheless it is still sad. When she dies she will not be here to enjoy that 21 gun salute and as an atheist (as she is, is she not?), I don’t believe she will know about it, but that is what drives her as you say Kate. Now I think there are a lot of celebrities in the world with some quite serious daddy issues (Lily Allen is a notable one in the UK IMO), but how starved of attention as a child do you have had to be to be this concerned about people remembering you? Quite a lot I would say. Problem is for both Tony Blair and Jolie, what has driven them is the very thing that has guaranteed they won’t get what they desire i.e. a willingness to sacrifice ethics and morality for celebrity. It is this that people will always remember them for, not changing the world for the better as they had hoped. And as for Josephine Baker, well does anyone but a real fan know her for her humanitarian work and her multi-cultural family? Because I for one had never heard of it. I think she is an icon because she was the first black female star and would have been remembered whatever she did or didn’t do after that. Jolie doesn’t have anything like that to distinguish her, she is just: weird, eccentric, sex bomb. And I don’t think that is going to hold up too well in the celebrity halls of fame. JMO!

    Reply
  36. Emerson said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:04 pm

    @Lizzy:
    I’m confused because the pic of the twins from the other day do not look anything at ALL like this little boy…in the other pics both twins looked like Shilo with the big lips, and idk, this one looks different, perhaps it is Angie’s “assistant’s” child? Fathered by Brad? Oh MY my mind is running, LOL

    Reply
  37. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate I see what you are saying but I don’t agree it will work out as she wants it too, there are just too many flaws in her plan that will come back to bite her on the bum now.

    1) She is not well-liked any more and she knows it. People have seen through her humanitarian act and can see she is doing it for her own ends, and people will hate her for this.
    2) She has trampled on too many people and done too many bad things to maintain her faux-saintly image. She cannot buy the press forever and it will all come out with bells on the moment she takes her eye off the ball (or her pay cheque!).
    3) She has some serious issues that a) are probably life-limiting and b) will not do her image any favours if and when they are made public. I wouldn’t necessarily count on her being here in 4 years time to hook up with this politico to be perfectly honest.
    4) She is not taking care of those children and none of them seem to have the bond with her that children should with their mothers. I have never once seen any of her children look at her with affection, try to cuddle or cling to her and I have never seen her doing the same back to them. She walks them around gripping their arms and not looking at them, and they don’t look back at her either. She is not a mother to them, she is, like you say, head of the army. This is already becoming apparent and will only worsen in future years, and she will be hated even more for it. Nobody likes a bad mother, they really don’t and she will not get away with it for much longer.
    5) Her looks are fading fast and I would say her real age is close to 40. That gives her only a few years left making films in HW before her career is toast. She will not be able to keep making good money from films and will soon be even more reliant on doing endorsements and selling pictures of her kids. Salt is going to be a major Turkey and will damage her employability with HW producers consierably. Like you say, The Tourist may save her, but considering her business is her looks and she is looking pretty ropey for this shoot I would say this is in the balance.

    In short, I don’t think the plan – which I’m sure you’re right in saying she has – is going to work out the way she has hoped. I think she is on borrowed time, both career-wise and life-wise I’m afraid. We shall see though!

    Reply
  38. Emerson said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    ummm, don’t think you’ll ever get that acknowledgement ;)

    Reply
  39. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate do you remember when Brange released that long-range fuzzy pap photo of Angelina in a bikini at some chateau in France to quell rumours that she was faking the pregnancy? You wonder what is going on with these long-range (Venice) and bizarre (ice cream shop in Syria) pics of the twins. I know you think she is trying to keep them under wraps to use as her trump card when she is getting really bad press but I think it is more than that. I think she could have been using them a lot more for good press in the last 18 months and she has really needed it (look how she has been running around the world getting her photo taken at the site of any charity/humanitarian cause she could find in an attempt to out-flank Ian’s book). I still think there must be something up with them for her to have used them so little and in such a fleeting way. She is missing out on some of their most bankable years and we all know Angie is not one to miss an opportunity to make $$$$ out of her kids. JMO, but I am sure there is much more to the lack of exploitation of the twins’ images than her just keeping them back as a secret weapon, just not sure what it is!

    Reply
  40. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    @Emerson:

    Ha ha – yes! The moment she gets cornered she runs! Look how quiet she’s gone because she knows she’s given irrefutable evidence that she is an idiot! I don’t think we’ll be seeing her around these parts much more, she’ll probably stick to FF. If she does come back I’m going to keep asking her that question until I get an answer! Lol

    Reply
  41. Tamara said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    @Reality Check:
    Well, that explains that! I kept looking at that picture saying what’s wrong with this, thank you!

    Reply
  42. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    @Emerson:

    Ok I just looked at that pic and I agree with you. This little boy looks like a much older child than the one in the pics yesterday. How old are these children supposed to be? Isn’t it about 18-20 months? He looks older than that doesn’t he? Hm, I just get the impression that they were not born at the same time and are not the same age (nor look it) which was why they have been kept hidden from view for such a long time and why Holly told the press that they had been born and then Brangelina said it was someone pretending to be her and that they hadn’t. We can’t forget what happened with that Holly Goline e-mail, it is an important detail. I think Knox is older than Viv and they were born to two different surrogates. He looks like her here, but does he look like Brad? Not sure. Shiloh looks like Ange did as a child, which just happens to bear a resemblance to Brad which is handy really. Knox, not so much to me, but who can say at this stage really? I don’t think they are twins though, just two separate embryos who happened to be conceived and born at around the same time. JMO!

    Reply
  43. Tamara said on February 18th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    I think its interesting that of Josephine Bakers rainbow tribe 10 were male and only 2 were girls. I think I read somewhere that they didn’t turn out too well and pretty much ended up homeless and scattered. There are only two men from the tribe who seem to be carrying on the legend who own a restaurant on 42nd Street in Manhattan, its something of a tribute to their mother. Does anyone know more about them?

    Reply
  44. babyjane said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    Is this “close friend” the one who so unreliably reported on this site a few weeks back that Madonna has dumped her 22 year old boy toy Jesus and was getting hot and heavy with a man in his 70’s? That she was done with toy boys? More recent photos indicate Madonna has not dumped Jesus at this point, just like Brangelina are still together, despite that recent book claiming doom, gloom, shocking splits, etc. By the way, Ian’s inner cleansing tips make for an amazingly riveting read, especially for an investigative showbiz news and gossip site

    Reply
  45. vi said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    @tamara

    I have also wondered what happened to all her kids. They couldn’t have had any money left since JB went bankrupt.

    Reply
  46. vi said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    BTW, is that really Jolie in that pic?

    Reply
  47. Emerson said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    yes, way too weird, I think they are exactly 20 months, and sooo dif from the pic the other day! Where the hell are all these dif baby mamma’s coming from? You could see the resemblence to Shiloh the other day, this one just was “off” i agree with you yet again, way two separate embryos! OH to be a nanny in that whacked out place! maybe this is the baby Angelina and Holly share, HA, just joking all! Don’t want Lori in here ripping me a new one, double HA

    Reply
  48. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    IAN~! What do you know about the Sudanese model’s child? Was it male? About 2 1/2 years old now? Questions are being asked about Brad Pitt’s recent photos taken with this “mystery child”……any clue?

    http://www.celebitchy.com/91938/empress_zahara_mystery_jolie-pitt_child_greet_venice/

    Reply
  49. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    “I’m still wondering if perhaps there some child chronologically in between Shiloh and the twins that we’ve somehow missed all of these years. Let’s call this one Fax Cannes Jolie-Pitt. Little Fax looks like he’s about two-and-a-half, right?”@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  50. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    @Tamara:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mia_Farrow

    List of children

    With André Previn:
    Matthew Phineas Previn (born February 26, 1970; twin of Sascha)
    Sascha Villiers Previn (born February 26, 1970; twin of Matthew)
    Fletcher Farrow Previn (born March 14, 1974)

    Adopted with Previn:
    Soon-Yi Previn, (born in South Korea, October 8, 1970; adopted c. 1978)
    Lark Song Previn, (born in Vietnam, February 15, 1973, died in New York, December 25, 2008; adopted 1973)
    Summer Song Previn (also known as Daisy), (born in Vietnam, October 6, 1974, adopted 1975)

    With Woody Allen:
    Ronan Seamus Farrow (born December 19, 1987), (birth name Satchel O’Sullivan Farrow)

    Adopted with Allen:
    Moses Amadeus Farrow (also known as Misha Farrow) (born January 27, 1978, adopted 1980)
    Dylan O’Sullivan Farrow (also known as Eliza Farrow, current name is Malone, born July 11, 1985)

    Later adopted solely by Farrow:
    Tam Farrow (1979 – March 2000)
    Isaiah Justus Farrow (born 1992)
    Kaeli-Shea Farrow (now known as Quincy, adopted 1994)
    Frankie-Minh (born 1991, adopted 1995) (named after Frank Sinatra)
    Thaddeus V. Farrow (born c. 1988, adopted 1994)
    Gabriel Wilk Farrow

    Reply
  51. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @Lizzy:

    makes me wonder… are Jen and Angie (*gasp*) friends?

    Reply
  52. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    @babyjane:

    No you wally, they are obviously two different sources: one from camp Ange, one from camp Madge. Whether they are legit or not is another story. This Ange one sounds like a PR deflection attempt to me, not legit. And as for Jesus, well you’d have to be visually, aurally and mentally impaired to not see that he plays for the other team and is just a PR prop being used to keep an aging (badly) sex symbol relevant. And that is not JMO! Lol

    Reply
  53. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    Sorry, that is a direct quote from the article which I posted the link@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  54. sela said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    Jolies jawline was photoshopped! A horrible hatchet job. Blur tool used to sweep her skin over her jawline and onto her neck in a stupid and obvious manner. I would never doubt that she uses botox but it has nothing to do with this hack job photo. Her right jawline was completely normal in the previous day’s photos.
    That child is Shiloh …. sucking thumb, missing tooth. It looks like she may have a new haircut which was covered by her monkey hat in the gelato photos. Popsugar is also claiming the child is Shilloh.
    Something seems not quite right with Knox in the venice photos (a few days ago) … he seems less alert and bright eyed as the other children and his eyelids seem a little heavy. Maybe he needed a nap or maybe he is way more introverted than the other children. (?) Hard to say – photos don’t always capture what is really going on … too bad the bodyguards can’t share!

    Reply
  55. Tamara said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I don’t think the Sudanese baby would be 2-1/2 – when was she due? Late summer? Sometime after Cannes I thought. But that boy is definitely not the one they were carrying in the first set of Venice pics, that boy is def at least 2-1/2 so I don’t know who he is! And I don’t think anyone else does either! LOL Maybe they picked him up on the street thinking he was one of theirs and didn’t know the difference! hahaha

    Reply
  56. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:20 pm

    any of you have the new People yet. highlights (and lowlights):
    -featured article on Angie’s “goodwill” visit to Haiti, including posed camera pics
    -Katie Holmes looking 10 yrs. older
    -fake couples: Shia Labeouf and Carey Mulligan, Renee Zellweger and Bradley Cooper, Zac and Vanessa

    Reply
  57. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    @sela:

    It wasn’t photoshopped, she has it in two pictures in that group and one at an awards do last year. Look at the pics on US Magazine:

    http://www.usmagazine.com/healthylifestyle/news/doctors-explain-whats-wrong-with-angelina-jolies-face-2010182

    It is from all the work she has had done, quite simply. There’s no way she’s 34, she is pushing 40 without a doubt. If she was telling the truth about her age she’d be the only actor or actress doing it in HW!

    But I agree with you that that must be Shiloh, can’t be Knox! Plus they always take the girls out together, the boys out together, and the twins separately so she is with her correct photo opp mate, Zahara. Can’t believe that Perez is insisting that it’s Knox! Well if he’s grown by about half a foot since yesterday it could be, otherwise no!

    Reply
  58. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    @sela:

    Plus I suspect she gets a bit of extra-tightening done face-wise before major events like awards do’s and film shoots. I’m pretty sure I saw a doc on a non-invasive surgical face-lift which involved threading cotton through the skin which was then tightened and the skin pulled back. Could be that or just an overdose of botox doing weird things to her facial muscles.

    Reply
  59. Kate said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    You can look at the foot and hand size and tell that is not Knox. Shiloh, just not a touched up photo, and we are seeing her full head of hair, although there is one picture that the child does not look like Shiloh or Knox and I wondered if possibly a nephew was brought along. The picture of the child with the stripes on the sleeves does not look like Shiloh at all. Regardless it certainly got everyone talking about them again didn’t it. lol We all wondered what the next trick might be. Guess this is it. Hate to think that this could be a new addition to the family, and just not announced yet. One pic Shiloh, another no. Likely her, but I would not be at all surprised if this is another big PR moment for them. Pink ties for Z and a blue blanket for Shi and boys shoes,shirt, pants, did Shiloh suddenly turn into a boy, doctors made a mistake at birth, what? Not even cute boys clothes.

    undecided.

    Reply
  60. Kate said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    That Sudanese baby was due around Nov/Dec 09 from what I remember, a boy, so he would not be very old, she was only 4 or 5 months pregnant at Cannes. In chat IAN said he heard she did have him, but that child does not look mixed anyway, least not to me.

    Reply
  61. Emerson said on February 18th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    great pic find, and no WAY is that Knox!! He/she looks to be around 3-4!!!

    Reply
  62. Kate said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    Lets see how toting them in and out of like this lasts, that can not be fun for Brad, and on a water taxi ha ha, bet he is having the worst time of his life. Not easy to hide in Venice. nope, lost yes, hide, no. this will get old very fast. How long before he heads to Milan to visit George or his Chateau to oversee some more cough cough renovations? lol amazing what he has done to himself.

    Reply
  63. Emerson said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    @sela:
    absolutely not photoshopped! DUH! She is def photographed that way in many photo’s recently!@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Keane, you need to have your own gossip site, Perez is a HACK who so obviouslly wants Brangelina to adopt him that he has lost any and all creibility he perhaps once had! Saying that child is Knox is nuts! Plus he worships all things Brangie!! lol

    Reply
  64. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    @Kate:

    It’s weird, doesn’t look like the pics of Shiloh from two days ago, but it is obviously not Knox. Shiloh’s face usually looks totally different to that. If it’s not her it would have to be one of Brad’s nephews, unless James has fathered a child we don’t know about….?

    Reply
  65. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    @Kate:

    Hey hun, was just trying to get on at home and couldn’t – is there a problem there?

    Reply
  66. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    @Emerson:

    Aw thanks, but not quite ready to take that on yet! Maybe some day further on down the line though!

    Reply
  67. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    anybody keeping up on this story about the crazy guy who crashed a plane into the IRS building in Austin, TX? I’m getting word that he might be a Scientologist

    Reply
  68. ancient chinese secret said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 3:42 pm
    IAN~! What do you know about the Sudanese model’s child? Was it male? About 2 1/2 years old now? Questions are being asked about Brad Pitt’s recent photos taken with this “mystery child”……any clue?

    http://www.celebitchy.com/91938/empress_zahara_mystery_jolie-pitt_child_greet_venice/

    The kid absolutely looks like Pitt (eyebrow line). Check it.

    Reply
  69. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    @ancient chinese secret:

    Shiloh = Sudanese’s kid?

    Reply
  70. vi said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    What is this about a sudanese kid? Catch me up please.

    Reply
  71. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:27 pm

    LOL Tam, It wouldn’t surprise me one bit! Don’t know who this boy is, but he does resemble Brad a bit, Jolie? not one bit. If the twins were born 7/12/08, and Holly announced their birth two monts earlier, it would make her child 2 y/o so could this possibly be a large child for his age since Holly Goline is a large woman? Just thinking out loud here…..mmmmm@Tamara:

    Reply
  72. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:29 pm

    True Kate. Perez posted it to be Knox, another site said it’s Shiloh, then suddenly they all began to question “who is that mystery boy?”…..Jolie and Trevor have done it again, and puzzy-whipped Brad went along with it….what a loser PittY is….@Kate:

    Reply
  73. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:30 pm

    One more thing that struck me about this boy’s photo op……notice he also has a tooth missing like Shiloh? Must be really rough play going on in the Jolie-Pitt house!!@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  74. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:35 pm

    Yes, i noted the resemblence to Brad instantly, then checked for features that could possibly be Voight DNA but found none. The Voight children all have the dominant trate gene of the full lips it seams, but this boy has thin lips, nose is narrower and much more tip tilted like the Pitts. I’d guess it’s either Brad’s child, or a close relative to Brad. Remember, Jolie recently stated in an interview that they have an open relationship, with no chains on either one….well. @ancient chinese secret:

    Reply
  75. sela said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    @Keane – thanks for the response and the photo – the bafta photo US magazine provided is the only photo from the Bafta’s I could find with the neck folds (I checked Getty and Google images). She was really turning her head and I am sure this highlighted any work on her face and neck.
    @Emerson – no need for rudeness DUH! Please provide links to the recent photos of her being photographed with the neck “thing” since they are “def” out there.
    I do agree with you … I prefer reading posts from Keane and other regulars on this site more than Ian’s (sorry Ian but …. )

    Reply
  76. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    This has me wondering how many other children are involved with this toxic duo that we have never seen nor heard of yet. Does Brad’s brother has a boy about this age? Anyone?

    Reply
  77. sela said on February 18th, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    Another opinion ….. (?)

    http://www.celebitchy.com/91841/what_is_going_on_with_angelina_jolies_neck/

    Note by Celebitchy: Although Hollywood Life notes that there are photos from at least two different agencies that show this strange protrusion near Angelina’s neck, many people are commenting that it’s a bad photoshop job. You can see the difference in the pixels on the skin right near the alien scar thing and her other skin. It looks like someone used the smudge and clone tool. There’s also a pigmentation difference between the two photos, where there’s a dark mark on her cheek in the bottom photo they show and no mark on the upper photo. It really looks like Photoshop. Sometimes the same photographer will sell pictures to different agencies so if this is the case it could be the work of one person. It could alternately be some kind of prosthetic for a role, if she’s actually filming now.

    Reply
  78. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 18th, 2010 at 7:02 pm

    @sela:

    I think the BAFTA shot probably gives the lie to that opinion, but we are all a bit more interested now in who that child is than this anyway. Wow, that has just made me think: did they just unveil some mystery kid they had been keeping up their sleeve all this time to distract from the botched plastic surgery shot? That Angelina is a wiley one, I wouldn’t put anything past her! I also think the whole pap agency photoshopped pics of a celeb angle quite difficult to believe anyway. Especially with someone as wealthy and powerful (media-wise) as La Jolie is. Sounds like the quickest way to get hit with a lawsuit (as we know Angelina is keen on) and to never get another exclusive deal with a celeb ever again to me. Not food for business!

    Reply
  79. Pattyanne said on February 18th, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    http://www.usmagazine.com/healthylifestyle/news/doctors-explain-whats-wrong-with-angelina-jolies-face-2010182

    For anyone who may have missed my earlier post. The Title of this is “Doctor’s Explain What Is Wrong With Angelina Jolie’s Face”. Several plastic surgeons state their opinions, and there are many photographs taken over an expansive time period showing this weird “neck worm” thing going on with AJ. Enjoy!!

    Reply
  80. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1251949/Suri-Cruise-totes-500-designer-bag-match-mum-Katie-Holmes.html

    what the hell were the Cruises doing in Jamaica?

    btw, Priscilla Presley is on Larry King right now…prank her w/ an anti Scilon call

    Reply
  81. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    curious, how much would a paparazzi shot of Cruise or Travolta kissing a dude be worth? more than one w/ Brangelina and the kids?

    Reply
  82. mooki said on February 18th, 2010 at 9:24 pm

    @mooki:
    more than:
    -Brad or Angie solo sans kids?
    -Brad and Jen Aniston on a date again?
    -Angie w/ Johnny Depp kissing while not on the film set?
    -any other closeted male actor/actress/singer same-sex kissing?

    Reply
  83. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 12:42 am

    @mooki:
    there has already been a pic JT kissing a dude..about a year ago..no one cared. nor would they if it were Tommy boy, everyone knows he is gay. Look at EM, he has no problem on screen and yapping about it off screen, just not a big deal anymore.

    Reply
  84. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 12:45 am

    @mooki:
    I dare say the only photo on that list that would be a breaking the bank photo would be Brad and Jen on a date and kissing. the rest not so much, all expected to a degree, but for them to reunite, no.

    Now a picture of that threesome with Angie Brad and the diapers and whoever else was saying wa wa wa, lol

    hell yes, that would bring millions..

    Reply
  85. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 12:48 am

    IAN are you going to Venice, cause if you are not, well, we are going to have a long boring stretch for about four months..lol..great opportunities there for undercover..you can sell knockoff handbags almost anywhere there, or be a artist, lol..seriously, these two are going to carry this charade on for another year.

    Reply
  86. Debbie said on February 19th, 2010 at 6:45 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Have you always hated her or was there a particular incident that turned you against her? I always felt
    disturbed by her,it could be her mental issues/drug abuse I’m not sure but even in her early years of fame
    sensed there was something not quiet right with her,The words I find myself returning to are sinister & scary.You would not wan’t to be in the same room with this women!!! Girl interrupted was probably way too close for comfort.

    Reply
  87. NatalieX said on February 19th, 2010 at 6:51 am

    I would freak out if I was anywere near her.I think she would be super scary & intimidating.

    Reply
  88. keane cyber queen supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 7:30 am

    @ Debbie – no, to be honest I never paid a great deal of attention to her until a couple of years ago. The things that started to make me dislike her were 1) the hypocrisy of adopting one or two children from the developing world and bringing them back to a life of luxury in the west and being spoken of like you’re a saint because of it when the money you’re spending on them could have helped hundreds of thousands more children in need. (I also thought this about Madonna to tell the truth. She went to Malawi, chose an orphan, got an assistant to bring him back on the plane then started toting him around in ridiculously expensive clothing – ugg boots for God’s sake, I wouldn’t buy a pair for myself let alone a child!). So yeah the hypocrisy of adopting children from these dreadfully poor areas where millions of people are suffering and then blowing millions of $$$ on fripperies like ugg boots for the chosen few while the rest remain trapped in poverty is anathema to me. I was basically brought up without a lot of money which means that I really know the value of it and hate to see wealthy people blow money on luxuries when other people can’t afford the basis requirements of life. I don’t mean to say people shouldn’t be allowed to buy things for themselves to improve the quality of their life, just that they should think about what the value of what they’re buying is and what that money could be doing for someone else and whether this is a good use of it. If you’re spending money on something you need and are paying a reasonable price for it then fine, but I hate to see people blowing money for no good reason when other people are struggling to make ends meet. When there are people starving in the world, extravagance and wastefulness is a sin IMO.

    The other reason I began to hate her was the treatment of Jennifer Aniston by her diehard fans. To this day I honestly can’t believe a group of women would judge another woman according to her marital status, what she looks like and whether she has produced children or not. Anyone who knows me will tell you that the most fundamental thing about me is that I am a feminist. I specialised in feminist theory and literature at college in fact and it is something very dear to my heart. The whole purpose of the feminist movement was to gain equal rights for women and to stop them being judged purely on their looks, who they are sleeping with and their ability to reproduce alone. What Angelina and her fans have done is turn the clock back with regard to feminism by about 50 years. We have gone from a society which judges its women on the basis of who they are and what they do to what they look like, who they have managed to cop off with and how many children they have produced. Angelina has been deemed the “winner” because she is better looking than Jen, stole her man and gave him multiple kids. In contrast Jen is reviled in the most repulsive terms for being “barren”, “mannish”, “single and desperate”, and shock horror in her 40’s I tell you, what a crime – she may as well just kill herself now! And judging people on these terms has actively been encouraged by Angelina as frankly, it’s all she’s got. She isn’t a good person, she isn’t that talented and her career has never really fulfilled it’s early promise. What she can do is f*ck, look f*ckable and produce children (by whatever method she can get). So this is what women in the C21st are being encouraged to believe are the values we should all care about, because it’s what Angelina can do, and it is an absolute disgrace. So these are the things really which made me first hate Angelina and all that she stands for, and when I learnt about the exploitation of the children and humanitarian causes to promote herself that sealed the deal for me. In short, she disgusts me, on every level, and I would like to see her wiped off the face of the celebrity world, sooner rather than later. She is doing a huge disservice to society by trying to make people think her values are the right ones and she has to be stopped. Her power over the media is also getting scary now and this must also be stopped too. The world is becoming like a big brother state with her image stamped on the public consciousness like she is the ultimate example of the human species. It is scary and completely against the things the world has fought so hard for for a long time: democracy, equality and freedom of the press. This woman is trying (and succeeding in to a degree), to stop that. Hence she must be.

    Reply
  89. keane cyber queen supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 7:34 am

    And sorry for the lack of paragraphs etc, am writing on blackberry so can only see a small amount of text at a time!

    Reply
  90. coz said on February 19th, 2010 at 7:35 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Keane,in a galaxy far far away you commented about Oprah not coming out,do you have any info or is it just gay intuition,I never really thought she was but then I watched her cameo in 30 rock opposite Tina Fey and thought she can across oddly different from her talkshow persona, she almost had a different voice,weird not like Oprah. Do you think Oprah comming out would help gay rights? personally I think it might be scary to see what happened to her popularity.It would be an interesting test or public opinion,I went to her site & I saw an interesting article posted there about women who leave their male partners to & become lesbians latter in life,the gist of the story was that old sexuality is fluid (fail) story people tell to explain why they became gay at the age of 40 .I’m no expert but I think these people are lacking courage not knowledge! Do you think she was preparing her fans for her gay awakening??!!

    Reply
  91. joanne said on February 19th, 2010 at 7:48 am

    I read the national enquirer last month (I missed reading about crap while taking one) and they talked some crap about holey getting them hair cuts then Shiloh cut her own hair afterwards, I read that as..Zahara finds scissors and lops off Shilohs golden locks (jmo). After reading about Mia Farrow and Josephine Baker I realized holey is way behind, she needs to step up those adoptions if she wants to be in their league.

    Reply
  92. joanne said on February 19th, 2010 at 7:49 am

    @joanne:
    That should read last week not last month.

    Reply
  93. mooki said on February 19th, 2010 at 8:00 am

    looks like Lisa Rinna got the ol cease & desist letter from MTV for dissing Frankenstein Montag:

    http://omg.yahoo.com/news/lisa-rinna-apologizes-to-heidi-montag-for-surgery-remarks/36084?nc

    Spencer Pratt = Dorothy Stratten’s boyfriend

    Reply
  94. mooki said on February 19th, 2010 at 8:02 am

    @coz:

    it would be very interesting to see the reaction of Oprah came out as bi (sorry folks, she’s not full on lesbo, according to my Chi-town sources). Her audience is like sheep, follow the flock, baa baa.

    Reply
  95. mooki said on February 19th, 2010 at 8:07 am

    @Kate:

    oh yeah, this one:
    http://prettyboring.com/files/images/travoltakiss.jpg (allegedly this is the male nanny who was with Jett when he died)

    JT has also dressed in drag twice (on SNL as Barbra Streisand and in Hairspray), not to mention Staying Alive and Perfect. the Co$ and Kelly are really keeping him in there because they’ll release those files to the tabloids if he decides to flee the cult.

    Reply
  96. mooki said on February 19th, 2010 at 9:05 am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkftHC7Q14E&feature=player_embedded

    new video just released by Anonymous about the Vulture Ministers in Haiti. wow…

    Reply
  97. Emerson said on February 19th, 2010 at 9:50 am

    @sela:
    sorry, no rudeness intended! Just trying to be funny!

    Reply
  98. Reality Check said on February 19th, 2010 at 10:31 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    Keane, can I just steal your post and pretend it’s mine? You simply put together my own thoughts over the last five years and synthesized them all. WELL SAID! WOW!

    I do agree with you that her career did not fulfill its early promise. Her acting range appears to be more and more limited over time. Unless her roles deal with total darkness, screwed-up characters or psychiatric problems, she’s out of her element.

    She would never get the part of Mariane Pearl if she wasn’t dating Brad Pitt. She botched that movie by making it far less remarkable than it deserved to be and did a very poor favour to Mariane Pearl’s tragedy.

    She also botched “The Changeling” – I have never seen a colder performance than hers. This woman simply doesn’t know how to express human emotion in a touching way. What is she doing in the cinema? Ah-h-h-h, papa John was there and made it possible – I forgot.

    She’s not even offered good movies and good parts anymore (well, thanks God for that at least) – all she gets is run-of-the-mill thrillers and action movies and all she does is shoot & pucker & shoot & pucker, etc., etc.

    She has turned the clock back with regard to women not by 50 but 1000 years. Thanks to her, we are back to the caves – as long as you look better than someone’s wife, you are perfectly entitled to anybody’s husband and you will be admired, not reviled for that.

    As for the wife, wow, who cares? She should have given her man a couple of babies. She has only herself to blame. She should have stayed in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant. That makes me think the audience that she appeals to most is those who can do only that.

    She has no values and no real personality of her own and she doesn’t have the guts to stand by them. In order to stand by something, you must have something to stand by first. If she had any, she wouldn’t have had to adopt one persona after another and dump them when they no longer work for her.

    In short, she is a moral chameleon. I doubt she knows who she is herself. All she knows is what the public may want and she goes with that not caring about what she was until yesterday and that the public will see the difference and laugh at it. All she wants is to lead. Thankfully, we are no sheep.

    I detest everything she stands for. I hope people never let her be. Somehow she made those women who have kids look down on those who don’t. It’s horrible to see the division she created. Thanks to her, many women forgot about compassion and empathy for other women.

    She’s also turned into an influence on many young girls and women, who will grow unsympathetic to their own gender thanks to her. Her influence has to be analyzed, explained and nailed to the wall on this and other blogs, so that the damage of her presence in the public eye is minimized.

    RC

    Reply
  99. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 10:52 am

    @coz:

    I think the first and most obvious way you can tell if someone is a closeted gay person is if the account they give of their personal life does not ring true at all. I mean, Stedman or whatever his name is – couldn’t she have found someone a bit more plausible than that? And the fact that they have supposedly been together for years but aren’t really settled down as a couple, have never had children etc etc, it is just so obviously bogus. Then you have to think about the law of averages. Just like with men, there are a higher proportion of openly (at least behind-the-scenes openly) gay women in industries like TV than you might find in other professions. The entertainment industry has always attracted gay people to it, and there are always a lot more of them than you might meet elsewhere. Having worked in TV I can tell you that there are quite a lot of gay women in it, some which are obvious once you know it and others which you would never have guessed in a million years. Some are butch, some are feminine, some are absolute stunners, some really aren’t attractive at all etc – there’s quite a broad range. So with Oprah you just kind of join the dots in terms of her fauxmance, the law of averages and the kind of female broadcasters I know of in the UK who are closeted and gay. And my conclusion is yes, she definitely is, otherwise she definitely would have had a more convincing hetersexual relationship by now, and she hasn’t.

    And as for whether her coming out would help gay rights well we really need anyone and everyone who is closeted to come out, so we get a more accurate representation of how many gay people there are in the world, which to me is the only effective way to combat homophobia. It has to be more about one individual to really be effective I think. But the big problem for Oprah, as it is so many celebs, is that they have been closeted and lied about it for such a long time that it is more the admission that they have sold the public a false image of themselves that makes them coming out so risky, rather than the fact that they are actually gay. The problem is people trust Oprah, and when they find out they have been lied to, they are going to be extremely angry. They may not be homophobic, they may just be mad that they have been sold a false bill of goods as it were, and in reality this woman they have admired all this time is not quite as open and honest as they thought she was. So yes, I think the only way she can sell it would be by saying she decided she was gay in later life and keep pretending the relationship with Stedman was real. Problem with that though is that the gay community knows she is lying and will not admire her for this, and she will inevitably lose fans among the more right-wing religious community in the US, which could destroy her career. The thing is that she has really left it too long now to come out with any degree of moral righteousness. People will think, well she’s been in the public eye for such a long time, why has she never admitted this before? Quite simply she will look like a coward, and this will not chime well with her feminist, and in particular, African-American feminist, image. I basically think she has boxed herself into a corner which she can’t get out of and the only way to retain her career and the love of her supporters is to keep on lying, which to me – and I think probably her too as she is an intelligent woman – is a sad way to live. I personally would not change her billionaire lifestyle for being comfortable with who I am and not having to live a lie. But then, a lot of people live a lie every day of their lives without her money! I just think if you are that financially comfortable you should be one of the first people willing to say: “this is who I am and if you don’t like it, see if I care!”. Shame she can’t do for gay rights what she has clearly done for the rights of women and African Americans. There is still time left though, let’s see if she is gutsy enough.

    Reply
  100. coz said on February 19th, 2010 at 11:22 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Thanks Keane,I think she has waited too long too.

    Reply
  101. Debbie said on February 19th, 2010 at 12:32 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Thanks for replying keane,thats a lot of words on a blackberry!!!!

    Reply
  102. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    @mooki:
    mooki, first, did you happen to read the man’s suicide note, by any chance, what in it led you to believe he was in the COS..second question, any compassion by any chance?

    I know one of those families well, and you can not even begin to imagine how wrong you are.

    Reply
  103. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    She issued a very strong almost violent denial that she is not gay, “knock this shit off or else I don’t want to hear another word about it” and that was what, 3 months ago…I would be shocked if she did a turnabout after that.

    Reply
  104. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    so true Keane, but she will not be wiped off, because she knows that doing exactly what got her there will keep her there, because it is the men that make those decisions. you guys may as well accept , Angelina is going no where but UP..wait and see..unless she has a overdoses, (hopefully not) but someone who is a manipulative as she is and can accomplish what she has by using others is not going away. lets be realistic, she has a entire network around her, and yes she has pissed off people, but it is like a terrorist cell, you whack the head, and new one pops up. She will just keep regenerating, and as long as she has people ,yes people around her that she can pay to pump her up, she will stay on top. Maybe not as an actress, but she will as something, Angelina Jolie is not ever going away, unless she dies, and then she will be martyr unless people really tell the truth.

    Perfect example, look at all we know, all that has been told, even by IAN and yet his publishers would not allow it in his book. Hell they would not even allow published info on Brad in the book about Thom Racina, and that
    basic relationship is a huge question mark and is a documented fact by Thom Racina himself. Now what makes all of you think that suddenly she is going to fall through Alice’s rabbit hole never to be seen from again? It is not going to happen. She works the system, and unless Brad or someone begins to tell the truth , the real truth it will be what it is. He won’t, she is the mother of his kids. Others won’t , they are protecting their jobs or future jobs, is there a deep throat out there besides her that keeps all these reporters mouths shut? Apparently not. She makes money for people, maybe not her movies so much, but in many other ways that we are not even aware of. Now in then end , by the time she is old, yes she may be a nobody, long forgotten ho. but for the next 10 years or so, she is in her prime. bets on.

    Brad still has his game on, if he does not wait too long. Tree of Life needs to be a big hit for him, and Plan B.

    jmho and we are looking at this from different perspectives , mine is just outside, non personal business only.

    Reply
  105. guest123 said on February 19th, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    @Keane : “I think the first and most obvious way you can tell if someone is a closeted gay person is if the account they give of their personal life does not ring true at all. I mean, Stedman or whatever his name is – couldn’t she have found someone a bit more plausible than that? And the fact that they have supposedly been together for years but aren’t really settled down as a couple, have never had children etc etc, it is just so obviously bogus. ”

    So does that make Jennifer Aniston gay because she didnt’ have kids…..you just said above that how dare people judge Jennifer for not having kids……and here you are judging Oprah and calling her suspect gay…..contradict yourself much ?

    Reply
  106. Pattyanne said on February 19th, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    Oh Ian, you are famous all over the blogs now!

    “The NY Post has a report today from an unidentified source. I’m guessing from the tone it is probably that Ian guy or one of his people. In the report it says that all these photos we are seeing of Brangelina and their brood in Venice are staged so people will know they are together. OK, here is my thing about that.”
    source:
    http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/

    Reply
  107. coz said on February 19th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Gayle King has said we would be the first to tell you if we were gay.
    sure you would Gayle I bet, a former office manager of Oprahs has gone on the record saying that she descriminated against men,especially black men,a guy wrote a book using his information & he was charged with trying to blackmail Oprah,the book was not well publicised,but it also details Oprahs relationship with Gayle King,the book may or may not be crap but seems to have been hushed up,Oprah has so much power in the media she could make anything negative dissapear…..her & angelina should get together & use there amazing personas to fix the world & all its problems

    Reply
  108. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    Yes, the EL, thanks Patty, who hates Jen, and is probably on the Brange fantasy train, never has a bad word to say about them, sounds like a loon (Angies word not mine) as much as Lainey does, and I would be hates IAN and ‘his what, his people lol who would that be, Sugar Ray?” had to ask, because let’s face it, IAN burst on the scene and stole EL’s thunder..

    oh well, that is how the blog cookie crumbles, maybe he should move out of his mama’s basement, as if..right..

    lamo

    Reply
  109. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    okay now if only Brad could get someone to write him a “I am sorry I am the one who is to blame, not Jen letter” he would be home free. Tiger will be sailing by June 12, bet.

    lol

    Reply
  110. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    Keane, not sure about yesterday, maybe a glitch

    Reply
  111. Pattyanne said on February 19th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    Now that the mystery child sighting in Venice has been solved (Shiloh), we can get back to that horrendous wormy thing on Angie’s neck. Looks like the strings they attach during some mini face lift procedures to pull up the skin to me. It has been reported before that she has one on each side of her forehead from such a sugrical procedure so this would not be shocking. This means Angie has been doing small surgeries often over time to completely change her features into what she now shows. Morphed from Voight’s daughter, into a more refined version of Bertrand’s daughter. My goodness, it has been reported as well that while very young teens both AJ and JV had matching nose jobs in order to keep the similarity in looks going….what twisted thinking….

    Reply
  112. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    @guest123:

    Hi Mia, yes I suspect that Jennifer Aniston is gay – did you not know that? Oh dear, not another thing you didn’t know – it’s shaping up to be a really bad week for you facts-wise hey?! Oh and are you too scared to use your other usernames now mia/lory? Or just a bit worried about having to account for why you didn’t know the UNHCR was part of the UN and to tell us when you last met a president and for what reason (seeing as the reaoson I met one was so insignificant and all). Come on mia, put on your big girl pants and own up to your ignorance for once, it would make us all respect you so much more (and let’s face it, that would not be difficult at this point). Lots of love Keane xxx

    Reply
  113. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    @Kate:

    Yep sounds like she’ll be staying in the closet then, not sure that’s what she wants though. I think she is Ted C’s “Butter Pussy” or whatever her name is who wants to come out against all advice from her people. It’s a shame becuase whether she likes it or not one day people will find out (we always do in the end, even if these people have long since passed). With all her millions and all her influence she could make a big difference to the world now in an area which really needs some help i.e. gay rights. Another one who needs to man up in quite a major way. Pussy!

    Reply
  114. Pattyanne said on February 19th, 2010 at 4:28 pm

    yes Kate, Ian did upstage all the big fish in the celebrity pap’s pond didn’t he? They are all on the same bandwagon now, but it kills them to credit Ian for his part in outing the Brand. I’m waiting for NE to start printing half the dirt they have on Angie…..then perhaps Ian can devulge half of what he was not permitted to publish. Seems Brangelina does indeed have an “expiration date” afterall. LOL@Kate:

    Reply
  115. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    @Kate:

    Oh I disagree with you on this, 100%. No-one is infallible, just look at what has happened to Katie Price in the UK in the past year. She went from being the most famous woman in Britain, making millions of pounds a year just from marketing herself and was massively popular. One badly handled split later and she is now known as the most hated woman in Britain. She is still making money but it is out of notoriety not popularity. Angelina will be just the same. Her business has been her popularity, she is not known for her acting abilties or any particular expertise or talent, like Katie Price, her business is herself. Now should that popularity ever dip, there goes her career. She will still make a living out of being notorious, but she will not be the icon that she wants to be, she will be damaged goods. She is not comparable to someone like Tiger Woods because underneath it all Tiger has a unique talent and ability. Even if the whole world hates him, we will still watch him drive those balls on the green and wonder at his remarkable ability to get each one of them in those tiny little holes. Angelina does not have this going for her at all. She has her looks, she has her marriage and she has her kids and that is it. Once the looks go (and they are clearly on their way out), once Brad gets his balls back and leaves and the kids are stroppy teenagers who hate her guts and will not perform for the cameras she will have nothing. And the man-eater act does not look quite so cute when your pushing 50. Look at the way sex symbols like Sharon Stone and Demi Moore have gone, they are now written off as “cougars”, and so will Angelina. That woman is not 34 I’m telling you, she is pushing 40 and only has a few more years left in her HW-wise to make use of. And like you said, she will not succeed in Washington or in a political context, she is just way too high risk in terms of her personal life. It is one thing to be an edgy, reformed wild child in the “charity” field, it is quite another to be that in a political context. No way jose, it will not work. People are already catching on to the insincerity in her “humanitarian work” and it will not be long before many more people do. And besides, it’s getting old, it barely gets reported on now. Sorry Kate, but here we part ways opinion-wise; Angelina is no cockroach I’m sorry!

    Reply
  116. benjaminbutton14 said on February 19th, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    bb14. Doug Pitt has 3 children last I heard of 1 boy aged 9 and 2 girls aged 8 and 7 so that kills that theory of maybe that kid being Doug’s son.

    Reply
  117. Emerson said on February 19th, 2010 at 4:44 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    LMAO Thanks for the end of day laugh Keane!

    Reply
  118. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    @Emerson:

    Any time!

    Reply
  119. mooki said on February 19th, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b167406_bitch-back_jen_still_americas_sweetheart.html

    “Dear Ted:
    If you controlled Hollywood, who would Jennifer Aniston be with? Would Brad and Ange be together? I would like to hear more about your vision of a sexier Hollywood—I’m getting a bit tired of Robsten.
    —Mary

    Dear Heavy Hitter:
    How about Jen and Ange together? With all that tension, things would def be sexier. Don’t you think?”

    Reply
  120. Pattyanne said on February 19th, 2010 at 6:09 pm

    Dear Ted:
    I am constantly seeing Jennifer Aniston’s fans posting on the Internet about how sweet, friendly and easy-going she is. Is that really true?
    —Kat

    Dear Curious:
    Jen is a pretty laid-back chick. She likes to have fun, so if margaritas with your gal-pals ‘n’ gay boys sound great to you, then yes, she is as great as she seems.

    Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/index.html#ixzz0g1geHMV1

    Reply
  121. Pattyanne said on February 19th, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    Now this one will make you laugh!

    Dear Ted:
    Where are the Brangelina twins? Why are they never out with the couple and why are there never any pictures of them? What’s the deal?

    Dear Kindergarten Cop:
    Brad and Ange are trying to keep the little ones out of the spotlight as long as possible. Or at least until they’re a little older and more paparazzi-savvy like fierce little Zahara.

    Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/index.html#ixzz0g1hESzY3
    ==========================================================
    OR….until Angie wants to redirect the general discussions about her latest faux pas

    Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/index.html#ixzz0g1h6c7AM

    Reply
  122. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    Keane that is because you are not quite getting what I mean, no she will not surpass Brad in the field of A+ stardom , I agree, but I am talking about her just not going away off the celebrity map. That is not going to happen. Does Katie Price have the people surrounding her that Jolie does, people like like Colin Powell who still hugely supports her? She will find other avenues to make herself relevant, and make a movie or two to support herself and her children and her causes when she does not have a man in tow to otherwise do that. Brad of course is on the hook for the kids, so that is not much of a problem , is it?

    You are looking at how people think of her humanitarian work from the message board perspective, but it is not necessarily seen that way accoss the US by people that are in awe of that. She still is supported by many that are in the belief she is genuine, and the UN is going to continue to squeeze every drop out of her. CNN is not going to ever turn on Angelina Jolie. I would bet my home on it. If every movie flops they will defend her, and there won’t be a nasty split, just look at Brad, he is fighting back now at the paps. All this has done is piss him off. He said before when he and Jen were splitting it only made them draw in tighter to fight the paps. That is his rebellious nature. He may want out, but until they are left alone , and he can dictate the terms, they will not split publicly. I doubt very much he will tarnish her. His mother has taught him better than to trash his childrens mama, no matter what the situation, that is old American southern values, and he is rooted in it, like it or not. You will never hear him say a negative word about her. This is where you have to realize the difference in American culture vs British, as you said..conservative.. She is still on a pedastal to many . It is the american dream, where anyone can come and leave their past behind, and build a new future, and that is what she did, she went from wild drug child to humanitarian mother, and whether we believe that is correct or not, many in small town USA …do.
    She has no formal education, yet look at her resume, and I mean the one Trevor has put together for her. It is damn impressive for someone with her past. Most important, she has a strong will to survive. To keep reinventing herself, one upping. That is how she got where she is, among other ways, but that desire to be the “most important” is there, and those kind of people do not often fade away.

    Time will tell, but my instinct tells me, she is not going down unless she goes into rehab , drug or mental, something major will have to happen to cause that .

    Reply
  123. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 19th, 2010 at 7:53 pm

    @Kate:

    It’s late so I can’t stop for long but I do get what you are saying with regard to her popularity, and no I don’t think she will ever be completely wiped off the celebrity map but I think she will lose a lot of status the moment her looks go. No matter how many people think her charity work is really really great or whatever, there will not be the interest in her once she starts to look like a badly stitched together blow-up doll. The reason people like to see her do humanitarian work is because she looks purdy when she’s doing it, this is her USP. The moment she loses this it is over, people simply will not care any more. Being pretty and doing charity is Angelina’s USP as it was Diana’s, but Diana died before her looks could fade and she never went the major plastic surgery route that so obviously effs up people’s faces as it has with Angelina. She will always be young, beautiful Diana, Angelina will not. Look how superficial people are, they are already saying ugh, what the hell is up with her neck? And this will only get worse and worse as gravity fights all those many procedures she has had done to combat it. And she won’t only end up looking old, she will look weird, like Nicole Kidman does and like Kylie Minoge is beginning to. Nicole’s career is OVER and Kylie’s is going that way too. These women made their business on their looks, and once that has gone people toss them aside and move on to the next hot bit of flesh, without doubt. Whether Jolie has people like Colin Powell backing her or not will not help her with this very shallow but pretty fundamental problem. When it comes down to it, people do not like her for what she says and what she does (well she doesn’t actually do anything anyway, she just shows up and poses), they like her for looking pretty in pictures and glamming up that dreary old world of humanitarianism and politics. But this is predicated on one thing alone and that is her ability to remain young and attractive looking, and Jolie is not winning that war, she looks terrible lately. Seriously Sarah Palin is more attractive than Angelina and she is considerably older. I get what you’re saying about Ange still being popular with the mainstream American audience but that will wane. She is not going to be anywhere near as appealing when she is a single mom of six who is rumoured to be shagging peter, paul and mary. Brad has always made her appeal to middle America and without him she will struggle. And in HW I think too. He was the person who made her likable to a lot of people and without him I think she is going to struggle there too.

    So I see what you’re saying, yes she has that determination to succeed and be thought of as “the best” at all costs and above all else and that will help her to stay somewhere within the public eye but she won’t be anywhere near where she is now. Age is not kind to female celebrities, it really isn’t. Look at what has happened to Madonna’s image in the last 5 or so years. She has gone from iconic, perenially hot Queen of pop to a bloody laughing stock toting a gay man in his 20’s around to try to stay relevant. Maybe you’re right and we’re all less impressed by celebrity and more cynical than the majority of people in the US but I can tell you this is how Madge is seen over this side of the pond. It will only be a matter of time before Ange heads the same way IMO. We’ll see how the cookie crumbles though!

    Reply
  124. Kate said on February 19th, 2010 at 8:13 pm

    lol that was pretty fynny and a good discription I think. I suppose I am thinking she will at some point pull it together once they split and they will both suddenly look 5 years younger..ha ha, bet so.

    I think that her survival key will depend on who she chooses to align herself with as a partner next, (although who would want to inherit that brood?)if she sees herself as “Carla Bruni” she needs to find someone dignified that will allow her to have her girls, because I think most people here at least get that she is really not heterosexual. I could see her playing Princess Di, lol

    Wonder if she is running profiles on some available Princes around the world as we speak. ha ha

    Brad and her have only brought each other down at this point, can it get much worse?

    Reply
  125. Leah said on February 19th, 2010 at 10:05 pm

    Kate-what do you think will happen to Jennifer down the road? What do you see in her future?

    Reply
  126. Lizzy said on February 20th, 2010 at 12:06 am

    US Magazine: Explains why Angelina has GILLS! Hahhaha…priceless!!!

    Reply
  127. jan/sa said on February 20th, 2010 at 2:37 am

    keane” i don’t think jen is gay maybe bi and as for jolie being better looking i would prefer to look like jen she just seems to shine and the nickname golden suites her perfectly. i don’t think peewee is helping jolie at all at the moment as most of his films are all pending and if he was so in demand he would be working now and not playing daddy daycare. i think he now looks unappealing and disgusting and people are put off by his hobo dirty looks as well as his loss of crediblity and balls, he is now becoming like micky rouke and maybe he can get the ugly bad guy parts.
    i think jen will get remarried oneday and that is the only way (maybe) that she will ever be out of this sick trainwreck traingle. but as long as she is happy and enjoying her life i say live it and stuff the two morons.
    as for jolie she might be liked in the USA heaven knows why but world wide she has little impact and is not known because of her movies unless there is a strong actor like freeman or depp involved in the movie. she is fading fast and i think in 4 years time she will be in decline movie wise and fame wise unless you count fame as tabliods fodder. jmo excuse the spellig but i am on my way out too fetch stock for the shop.

    Reply
  128. jelana said on February 20th, 2010 at 3:47 am

    I think Jen might be gay too,I have no proof of course,I just see things about her that I relate to.

    Reply
  129. Kitteh Kitteh said on February 20th, 2010 at 4:37 am

    Shoot me for saying this but@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I think people are very happy to label people bi,its almost homophobic,this person isnt one of those gays ,they like girls/guys too !!people quote The Kinsey scale: I’m a 4 of whatever:predominantly straight with some bi tendencies,Kinseys research has been pretty well disproved ,the hollywood movie legitimised someone who’s research was sometimes falsified,& people use his scale to feel less gay or justify being slighty gay,this all helps disempower gay people, think she might be gay also but I don’t think she necessarily acts on it,there will never be an accurate representation of gays in the world because of societies prejudice against gays forces people into subdterfuge, so many people I encoutnter in life are married & hiding a lot of people know couples like this,especially in America..Where Fundamentalist Christians & Republicans have huge influence & there is a whole don’t ask don’t tell attitude everywhere there are so many are people hiding in plain site.Whether Jen is gay or not I don’t care,but I hate peoples readiness to say oh no their not gay ,bi maybe but not one of those gays.

    Reply
  130. Kitteh Kitteh said on February 20th, 2010 at 4:45 am

    Sorry for that rant….But people please..

    Reply
  131. mooki said on February 20th, 2010 at 6:15 am

    http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebrity-news/442759/katie-holmes-late-night-calls-to-her-ex/1/
    “After renewing her friendship with former fiancé Chris Klein, it’s no surprise that Katie Holmes is keen to keep it from husband Tom Cruise.

    She’s secretly been calling her ex to complain about her marriage woes, Now can reveal.

    The actress has been pouring out her heart to her former love in a series of late night phone calls”

    Reply
  132. mooki said on February 20th, 2010 at 7:08 am

    http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.aspx?contractUrl=2&language=en-US&family=editorial&assetType=image&p=viva%20elvis%20world%20premiere%20#

    pics from the opening last night in Vegas of Cirque Du Soleil’s Elvis show. expected famewhores Lalabeirte and Priscilla Presley… but no Lisa Marie.

    Reply
  133. lillie Damita said on February 20th, 2010 at 8:18 am

    Does A.J have any fans here?

    Reply
  134. lillie Damita said on February 20th, 2010 at 8:21 am

    Ian could you please remove that pic of angelina it makes me nausous.

    Reply
  135. Jenny Shimizu said on February 20th, 2010 at 8:30 am

    I still love you Angiexxxx please call me!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO_jfbs9WtI

    Reply
  136. Jenny Shimizu said on February 20th, 2010 at 8:33 am

    I take that back………………..please dont call.

    Reply
  137. sunspot said on February 20th, 2010 at 10:13 am

    In that picture, Jolie is not breastfeeding the baby. She only pretends to. Look at her breast. Breast with milk will be fuller, and has green veins running down it. She doesn’t have it.

    Reply
  138. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 20th, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    @Kitteh Kitteh:

    Yep totally agree. I think for a lot of celebs saying they’re bi is a total cop-out. It’s like yeah I like to f*ck people of the same sex, but I can still conform to traditional heterosexual values and marry someone of the opposite sex and produce children like you want me too so everyone’s a winner hey? For female celebs it’s even more of a cop out than for men I think in that it probably adds to their appeal to the opposite sex more than detracts from it. Again it’s that concept of yes I will do sexy times with a girl (aren’t I so wild, daring and sexual) but I also have the option of conforming to society for the long haul, therefore I’m just like you! And this is exactly what Angelina has done, which is why she has had as negative an impact on gay rights as she has feminism. And of course, it’s all a big lie which doesn’t help the situation. Women like Angelina claim to be are a major bugbear of mine because so many women I meet are happy to sleep with a girl but would never go out with one or settle down with them. Because that would involve being brave and coming out and telling their family and they are just not prepared to do that. It has got to the point where I refuse to do anything with a girl unless she has some intention of taking it further, otherwise I feel like I am just being used like a fairground ride. So all in all I think more celebs need to man up and put their money where their mouth is. It is not brave to say you’re bi these days – Lady Gaga take note – it is brave to say you’re straightforwardly gay and that will never change. There are very, very few celebs in this world willng to do that and they are doing their kind a grave disservice. One of the things I always thought I would do if I ever became famous for any reason was be open about my sexuality, because no-one else seems to have the balls to do it. Ultimately, gay rights are so much more important to me than my career, and I would sacrifice the latter to aid the former. I think everyone has the right to a private life, but until more people in the public eye come out and start being open about who they are, we will still have the homophobia that is so pervasive in the world today. So come out, come out from wherever you are Oprah, Jen, whoever – you owe it to your people! Lol

    Reply
  139. mooki said on February 20th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/vanessa_hudgens_wants_zac_efron_to_put_a_ring_on_it/mikewalker/64539

    Vanessa Hudgens whines to Ashley Tisdale about not being engaged to Zac Efron. it’s a pure puff piece, but it shows the pure motives of this girl and her pr team to keep him in the closet.

    Reply
  140. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 20th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    NEWS ALERT – THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE

    Apparently CNN have run a 9 minute segment on the way Jennifer Aniston uses stories about her romantic life to promote her movies. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t CNN a serious news broadcaster, and they devoted 9 minutes to this? Ok, if we did not have the evidence before we do now, Jolie must either own shares in that company or she must be paying them in a major way. First the Haiti interview and now this? This is shocking. Can someone who knows more about the ownership of the TV networks in the US explain to me how she is doing this please? Surely it would take a whole lot of money to buy a news channel? Or was her little anti-Obama statement enough to keep this channel on side? But I have to say, either way, promoting her is one thing, running a nine minute segment on the woman she uses to try to deflect from negative publicity about herself is quite another, and on something that all celebs do too – shocking! I’m sorry but this stuff really scares me. To think some two-bit HW actress could control the media in this way is truly horrifying to me, it really is like a Big Brother state but run by a whorish pin-up girl. This is mind control and it is so wrong and my God will I do everything in my power to stop this woman achieving her aims. This is just one step too far for me, she is becoming like the celebrity version of Hitler, manipulating the masses through the power of the media. She has to be stopped.

    Reply
  141. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    http://www.cnnexposed.com/why.php

    “Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) has documented several factors that influence media conglomerates such as AOL Time Warner (CNN’s Parent Company). Three major factors described by FAIR are Corporate Ownership, Advertiser Influence, and Official Agendas. The following is FAIR’s take on what affects the news we see.” (short exerpt from this article)

    Reply
  142. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    Question: “Who Owns CNN?”

    Answer: http://la.indymedia.org/news/2003/04/47530.php

    TIME-WARNER TBS – AOL (donated 1.6 million to GW’s 2000 campaign)
    America Online (AOL) acquired Time Warner–the largest merger in corporate history.
    Television Holdings:
    * CNN, HBO, Cinemax, TBS Superstation, Turner Network Television, Turner Classic Movies, Warner Brothers Television, Cartoon Network, Sega Channel, TNT, Comedy Central (50%), E! (49%), Court TV (50%).
    * Largest owner of cable systems in the US with an estimated 13 million subscribers.
    Media Holdings:
    * HBO Independent Productions, Warner Home Video, New Line Cinema, Castle Rock, Looney Tunes, Hanna-Barbera.
    * Music: Atlantic, Elektra, Rhino, Sire, Warner Bros. Records, EMI, WEA, Sub Pop (distribution) = the world’s largest music company.
    * 33 magazines including Time, Sports Illustrated, People, In Style, Fortune, Book of the Month Club, Entertainment Weekly, Life, DC Comics (50%), and MAD Magazine.
    Other Holdings:
    * Sports: The Atlanta Braves, The Atlanta Hawks, World Championship Wrestling.

    Reply
  143. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 1:54 pm

    AOL (America On Line) aquired CNN, People magazine, In Style magazine, and is the largest owner of cable systems in the US.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  144. jan/sa said on February 20th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    i really do not agree that being bi is a cop out and there are people that are into men and women and that is fine with me. as for being homophobic crap as i have gay friends as well as bi friends and straight. because we all do not see things the same way do not label somebody as anti gay and as for christians just because you are a believer does not mean you judge gay people. and the only people that disempower gay people are themselves and most of the gay people i know which includes family have never been stopped from voicing their opinion and standing up for their rights.
    just because you are bi or gay does not mean you are less a person the choice is yours and so please do not label people as in colour or in a sexiest way they have aright to be straight, bi or gay. jmo

    Reply
  145. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 20th, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    @jan/sa:

    Hi Jan, I know some people who are genuinely bisexual but a lot more who say they are but just can’t admit to themselves that they’re gay. I don’t think anyone was calling you homophobic, my post wasn’t directed at yours at all to be honest, I don’t think I even read it. But it most definitely is not true that the only people who disempower gay people are themselves. Homophobia is still rampant in the world. Have you ever had anyone tell you you can’t sit somewhere because of what your sexuality is? (Admittedly it was not done by someone who had any control over that but it was still deeply unpleasant). Has a bouncer ever told you to stop kissing someone in a bar because that person happens to be of the same sex as you (shouted at to “pack that in” in fact)? Have you ever had people show open and naked hostility to you because you tell them that you’re gay? Have you had people run up to you and get really excited and scream “get the video cameras out” because you are kissing someone like you’re some sort of sex show? Been unable to walk around holding hands with someone you are seeing because it will attract too much negative attention? I have, all those things, which is why I have learnt to be careful what I say to who and what I do where. It is definitely not me disempowering myself in these situations, it is me being careful about my own personal safety. There are a lot of people in this world who find homosexuality repulsive and will attack you for it (both verbally and physically). Gay people are attacked in this country all the time (and sometimes killed) because of their sexuality. It is not a nice, gay-friendly world out there I’m afraid to say, which is why it is so important for celebs to come out and say who they really are and change public opinion. While there are probably still many racists in the world, it is accepted that it is disgraceful to be one, and there are even laws to ensure sentences for crimes are longer when there is a racial motivation involved. The same cannot be said for homophobia, not yet. We certainly do not have laws on our side and we don’t quite have that weight of disapproval that people who hold racist views have. Homophobia is still an acceptable prejudice and people defend someone’s right to have an opinion that “being gay is not right” all the time. Can you imagine them saying this about black people having the same rights as white people for example, defending it by saying “I have a right to my opinion that black people are inferior to white people”. It would never happen. As a society we still have a long way to go in making homophobia as unacceptable as racism is.

    Reply
  146. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 20th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Ok so are we thinking she must have a deal with AOL for positive coverage in People mag and CNN? Or she has shares in that company? Was it Kate who was saying she thought Angelina also has shares in the National Enquirer? All these news outlets seem to be publishing her propaganda, all this “Angelina is starving herself and it is all Jen’s fault” crap. Would any right-thinking magazine print such damaging stories which are utter BS unless the subject of them was wielding the corporate whip? I don’t think so. I’m shocked by the stories these mags have published, they are bordering on libellous with regard to Jen. One article (I think in Now magazine) accused Jen of making everyone hate Angelina with a 5 year media campaign, unbelievable. The fact that magazines are publishing these stories makes me think a LOT of money is changing hands. These are economically tough times of course, maybe this is how low they need to stoop to say afloat. It is truly unbelievable.

    Reply
  147. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    One of CNN’s entertainment news outlets is named Showbiz Tonight. The female host is very postive toward Jolie and has taken every opportunity to bash Jennifer Aniston, her name is Brooke Anderson. I do believe it’s a behind the scenes deal made by Jolie’s supporters to manipulate the press away from the latest snafus such as the neck photos of Jolie taken over a long period of time in which her past mini facelifts are evidenced, the recent embarrassment of the ‘mystery” baby photos where most of the press and public alike mistook Knox for Shiloh or whoever that child is….as Ian once told us, Jolie and her people are experts at diversion and manipulation of the press. People magazine has been pro Jolie/Pitt for a very long time, as they are also owned by AOL who owns CNN and other favorable reporting venues for Jolie, I would think that it is so. When Jolie is under attack, she never fails to twist it into another Jen attack in some way. I’m wondering what the payoff is for CNN stock holders in this? Jolie is on her way to becoming a has-been rather quickly, then what is to be gained? Only time. Just more time.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  148. mooki said on February 20th, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    I do think there is a slight chance that Jen and Angie are in on this whole charade together

    Reply
  149. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 20th, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    What was the name of the show that interviewed Ian with those ridiculously biased presenters who were obviously delivering lines fed to them by Jolie i.e. hanging out in a hospital is SLEAZY, you are trying to bring America’s most POPULAR couple down, they give to CHARITY (the 3 simple messages of the Geyer/James PR campaign)? Was it the same one? They were on the payroll too. Am wondering if they just have one conglomerate on their side and it is turning into a war with another i.e. Murdoch. Jolie could not be getting all this biased press just by being a celeb name that sells, she has to have some power over the news company itself I would say. That CNN interview with her in Haiti the other night was laughable, neither she nor the interviewer seemed to have a clear idea why she was there or what the purpose of the interview was. And a week or so later we have this incredible expose of Jennifer Aniston’s PR tactics, what a coincidence! Neither of these things constituted news, and yet Angelina has the power to get them out there, that is quite some influence she has. Oh and E!, they are all part of the same conglomerate? If they are then that figures. Ok, I take Dawn Olsen’s point, Angelina is scary smart, Hitler smart. She’s had this media thing sewn up for quite some time it seems…

    Reply
  150. Anonymous said on February 20th, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    That segment where you are talking about is old, around the time GG, so why bring it up again? That is what the loons want. Leave it alone.

    Reply
  151. Leah said on February 20th, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    Mooki-why did you say what you did?

    Reply
  152. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    She does appear to have some power over the media, although I cannot for the life of me figure out how unless there are big moneys that stand to be lost if she is brought down. I’ve noticed that the media seems eager to see her fall, but when just a little bit of support is shown, such as now, they all quake in their boots. Suddenly the mass media support for Jolie is visable regardless of what she has done to damage her facade. I have a feeling that when the great fakery of Brangelina does fall, there will be a lot of empty chairs on television entertainment gossip sites. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  153. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Oh! Just another short bit here – Have you noticed that Jennifer and Angie are like a teeter totter? Always when one is up, the other is down. Never equal.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  154. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 20th, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Hm, we need to ask Kate. Kate, where you at, what do you think?

    Reply
  155. Chris G. said on February 20th, 2010 at 7:12 pm

    @Sunspot, that picture is fake (whether Ian knows it’s fake, not sure). It was composed by New York Magazine before any authentic pictures were released of Shiloh.

    http://nymag.com/news/media/17257/

    Reply
  156. Leah said on February 20th, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    Kate-can you answer my question?

    Mooki-can you answer my question?

    Reply
  157. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 20th, 2010 at 7:29 pm

    @Anonymous:

    I honestly have absolutely no idea what you are saying there! If you would like a response you will have to explain yourself in a bit more detail!

    Reply
  158. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 9:00 pm

    I think you’re right on that Keane, with the battle looming over the law suit against Murdoch for printing the story of their soon to come breakup being “private” information, they are taking on the Big Boys now, and no way can Jolie/Trevor/Geyer/Jamie win against this powerful man. Smoke and mirrors….that’s what Jolie’s so good at, and that’s what she is doing now because she knows she will end up eating dirt after this law suit gets to court…deflection, misdirection, and more manipulation by the pro-ho. As usual Keane you are right on target with Jolie and her antics.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  159. Pattyanne said on February 20th, 2010 at 9:06 pm

    I honestly don’t believe that mooki. Jennifer was a betrayed wife, who’s husband made a mockery of their marriage vows during the time Jennifer was pregnant and continued during the time and after she lost their second pregnancy. The crass, cavalier manner in which Brad posed for W magazine with Jolie and five boys as a “family” must have been horribly painful for the still grieving Jennifer over the loss of her baby and her husband’s emotional support through this time. With so much emotional and physical pain, public betrayals, and premeditated, vicious attack set forth by Jolie (Jennifer didn’t want children so Brad came to me)….I can not see her cooperating with Jolie and / or Jolie and Pitt in a “Triangle” for publicity. A woman of such class and dignity as Jennifer Aniston has shown would take the high road and not participate in such a circus as what Brangelina has become. A huge joke , that’s all Brad and Angie and the Rainbow Tribe are now.@mooki:

    Reply
  160. mooki said on February 21st, 2010 at 10:04 am

    @Pattyanne:

    Jen classy? hardly

    Reply
  161. Pattyanne said on February 21st, 2010 at 11:02 am

    LOL, for all the good points I made in my response to you mooki, the only thing you could come up with against Jennifer Aniston was “Jen classy? hardly. Pffffffft!@mooki:

    Reply
  162. Tamara said on February 21st, 2010 at 11:52 am

    IAN !!!! Please put up a new post pronto – I’m beginning to think you’ve fainted away from fasting and are now lying on your floor dreaming of nachos!! Pleeeeeeze give us something else here. What’s happening in Venice, is Brad still there or has he jetted off to Germany to shop for art or furniture? What is the deal with the worms in Angies neck – Helllooooooooo Ian – I’m calling you xoxoxo

    Reply
  163. Tamara said on February 21st, 2010 at 11:53 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Waste of time Patty – now if you want to talk about COS then I’m sure you’ll get a nice lively chat from Mooki, otherwise…well, you know! LOL

    Reply
  164. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 21st, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    @mooki:

    Hm, if that was the case then I think Jen is pretty stupid. She has not exactly come off too well through it all. “She has been reduced to being the punchline of a joke” someone once described it as, which sounds about right to me. If this has been engineered by her people in any way then I think they need to be sacked stat. I think they need to be sacked anyway for making her often look worse than better with the PR they do for her. Enough with the implausible gay boyfriends Mr Huvane please! Get her to do some subtle, sexy photoshoots at home looking happy. Get her to say she has a love life but doesn’t want to spill details to the world because she has been burned so badly before. Stop playing to the image that Angelina and team have created for her of being shallow and self-absorbed. She isn’t stupid but often I think the PR they do for her is. She could do a lot better!

    Reply
  165. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 21st, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    @Tamara:

    I heartily concur. Seriously, we might as well be running this blog lately, we’re the only ones who are bringing up new discussion points! Ian – come out, come out wherever you are! There is so much to talk about right now!

    Reply
  166. Tamara said on February 21st, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    If I could control Jens life and heart I would have her with someone who is not an actor, but someone who is in the biz…like a Studio Exec or Attorney – maybe even a writer or a Director, but defo not an actor. Someone who would adore her, support her and let her be the star of the family. I’ve had enough interaction with Actors to know that two in one family don’t usually work and the ones who do usually let one or the other be the bigger star. For instance Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgewick, she basically bowed out for years and raised the kids then when they grew up she got back into it with a hit TV show. But, Kevin has always been the bigger star and she seems to be happy with that. Same with Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson. But when you have two compteting people in the same house I can imagine it makes life very difficult i.e. Josh Brolin and Diane Lane.

    Reply
  167. Angelina Jolie Reunites with Dad Jon Voight said on February 21st, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Angelina Jolie Reunites with Dad Jon Voight

    Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt enjoy a family day out with their kids down Venice’s Grand Canal in Italy on Sunday (February 21).

    Surprisingly, Angelina’s father, Hollywood actor Jon Voight, also came along for the ride.

    Angie and Jon haven’t always been on the best of terms but reportedly reconciled a few months ago. Glad to see the father-daughter relationship is all patched up and stronger than ever!

    Reply
  168. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I would guess IAN is traveling at this point , or working on another project, about how it was last year although later Spring

    Reply
  169. Leah said on February 21st, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    Jolie reunites with her Father. Pics on Just Jared. Time for a photo op with Jane and Bill now.One big happy family. The FFers sure can call this.

    Kate-can you answer my question? What do you see for Jen’s future? You told us what you see for Jolie and also Brad. What do you see happening for Jennifer?

    Reply
  170. Reality Check said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    @Leah:
    Yeah, I’ve just seen them, too. By the way, comment No. 4 is hilarious. Here is a link:

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/21/angeilna-jolie-reunites-with-dad-jon-voight/all-comments/#comments

    :)

    Reply
  171. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    @mooki:
    mooki, just curious, is that your opinion as the “I’m an undercover Hollywood insider type of guy and I get all this info from fellow internet spies doin’ the dirty work (where we get this info I can’t tell you). that reports on the Co$

    or is that opinion

    mooki the college guy that was hit on by some skanky girl he would not even look at a few weeks ago? (not sure why you told us that , but ..)

    just asking, trying to get a perspective here on which one understands what classy really is?

    Reply
  172. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    @Leah:
    lol oh wow, okay well, I am not a fortune teller , I was just basing that on business, and that is all. Jen is as image conscious as Brad is, no doubt about that, and she smart when it comes to business that is why she has made so much money. She may not win Oscars, but she does not choose movies to do that, she chooses one that her fans like, and ones that when they are released on DVD they will buy, and they do. Her DVD’s are one of the highest selling DVD’s there are, she makes millions, and that is what the people on JJ fail to understand.First and foremost Jen is a business woman. She likes to have fun, she loyal to her friends, and believes on working through problems, NOT walking away from them, and she does not. Anyone that knows her personally would tell you that.Does she use the system to promote herself, absolutely, does she give a ff what anyone thinks that she does as she collect she millions, lol, hello no.of course no, she is making her fans happy, they buy her DVDs. Now the next argument will be that it did not do well at the box office, and I will say ..so. Movies make their big bucks at the theater the first 6-8 weeks out of the gate, and of course so does the chains that show them. That is why Disney is in a pickle right now with Johnny’s new film. They want to put it out at that 8 week mark on DVD and the theaters are saying uh nuh..because of course a film like that would have a longer run, but at the same time it would also clean up in DVD sales. Realistically, the money is not at the theaters, for many films, not in this economy. Studios don’t want to finance big budget, and people don’t want to shell out 25-30 bucks to go see a film unless it is one that they really need to see on a big screen. Many download now to their LED’s and now 3D’s screens are coming out, so you can see what I mean, where Jen makes her money.

    Jen has made dramas, and done well, got good reviews, and she could continue and win something, stretch, and while the media and critics might scream for that, her fans don’t. They did not like seeing Jen getting raped. Sorry, that is just life, and as she gets older, I would bet she will at some point move to more serious films with a little bit of wit, in the same way that Robert DeNiro did, and Alec Baldwin did, both dramatic actors who have amazing comedic timing, as she does.

    Jen will never be a has been, she is America’s Sweetheart, and unlike Meg Ryan, who made a huge PR mistake, Jen has worked it well, and while this triangle may seem old to some, that is only because Brad, from what we have been told, all that is floating around in and out of the media, wants her back. He loves her, and that is the bottom line. The question is, does she want him back. Jen’s whoever told Ian not with six condoms, she may have said that, and I can’t imagine she would want anything to do with him in this mess he is in. But, will they end up together at some point as they get older, maybe, I would not be shocked, I don’t think she is over him, not really. Jen did nothing but talk about Brad for years, so just because now she is reaping some benefit of looking great while they are down means squat. Just good PR imo. On the other hand, maybe they will just be buddies, who knows.

    What I believe though is that Brad and Jen will remain a strong force in the movie industry,and Jolie will only make films to support her causes and needs. jmho and that is all it is.:)

    Reply
  173. Leah said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    Thanks Kate!!!

    Reply
  174. mooki said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    @Kate:

    the first one

    Reply
  175. Tamara said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    @Kate:
    Good summation Kate! I think Jen still loves Brad because she is that kind of girl. She doesn’t really hold grudges (well, maybe one teensy eensy one! ha) But, she’s had the same hairdresser, the same group of friends, the same publicist etc for so many years, she is loyal to her friends, she loves them, she doesn’t burn bridges, so yea, I think she still loves him and is concerned for where his life is at the moment, but I don’t think she wants him back as her husband, but I think if he could get out of the clutches of the evil one they could openly be very best friends. They always had so much fun together, so she not only lost her husband but her best friend too, and she probably wants her friend back in her life. JMO of course! ha

    Reply
  176. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    @Reality Check:

    Wow, she’s really wheeling the big guns out huh? First the twins and now her dad too and all in one week? Things must be bad if she’s going to these lengths. In a matter of weeks she’s played all her cards: first the mom video, the threats of legal action, then the SB lovefest, then the disaster relief spectacle, then the twins, the CNN dissing of Jennifer Aniston and now her dad too? I’ve said it before this woman is a fighter, and she’s used all the weapons at her disposal now. What will she do if this doesn’t work, whip out James for another go at their Oscar’s snogfest? Or maybe a lunch date with Jenny Shimizu, Jonny Lee Miller and Billy Bob Thornton in a “we’re all such a happy polymorphous family”-type scenario? Seriously this screams desperation to me, and it also makes me wonder if she is trying to shore herself up for something that’s about to come out about her. The Morton book maybe, or some damaging revelations about drug use or some sort of criminal actitvity? Just throwing ideas out there, she just seems REALLY desperate all of a sudden. I wonder what’s going on behind the scenes…

    Reply
  177. Tamara said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:49 pm

    @Kate:
    She does the serious rom/coms so well…The Break Up, Marley and Me, they were funny but also so typical heartfelt Jen, she doesn’t do strict comedy, she tugs at the heartstrings. I love her.

    Reply
  178. Tamara said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @Tamara:
    Which reminds me I watched The Goodbye Girl last night for the umpteenth time, what an awesome movie! An oldie and goodie- Richard Dreyfuss won the Oscar for that one!

    Reply
  179. mooki said on February 21st, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b167808_bitch-back_does_jake_have_new_gf_in.html

    “Dear Ted:
    Who do you see as Jake Gyllenhaal’s next girlfriend?
    —Rachel

    Dear Gyllenspoon 2:
    Isn’t it pretty simple? Who’s Jake’s next costar?

    Dear Ted:
    I’m a fan of both, Jen and Ange. Wouldn’t it be great to see them do a movie? (But L.A. would freeze over before that happened.) Maybe add a little Clooney in the mix to spice things up!
    —Sherry

    Dear Future Director:
    Forget Avatar, a Jennifer-Angelina flick would break box-office records everywhere. I, for one, would be there opening night. But you’ve got a better chance of Nicole Kidman going au naturel to her next premiere than that happening.”

    Reply
  180. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    @Reality Check:
    Hilarious, she did that already though yes, with that tacky video. Unbelievable.

    At least Jon is now getting to spend time with the kids, although I would bet the terms are more like a business contract. We all said long ago that when they split she would need Daddy by her side to survive it, and there he is.

    That picture alone, screams, they are done. jmo

    Reply
  181. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @Tamara:
    yes, she does, and people love those because the whole family can watch them, which is why they buy them. great library films, well maybe TBU would be reserved for teens. :)

    Reply
  182. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    @mooki:

    mooki have you ever owned a blog? just wondering..

    Reply
  183. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    It is amazing isn’t it, but Brad is on board with this, no one is holding a gun to his head. He obviously took little Knox out alone because he was pissed off that the media thought Shiloh was Knox or worse not even his kid. I imagine that stung a big. I bet he is angry right now. Can you imagine him lasting 3 months in that mess? lol The harder they try, the less people believe them.

    Reply
  184. Reality Check said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate,

    Ever heard the line “In my beginning is my end”? It comes from T. S. Eliot. I have always thought that if something starts in a quagmire of scandal, mental cruelty to other people and total lack of consideration for their feelings, it simply cannot grow into something lasting of high quality. I don’t even care if Pitt and Jolie will go their separate ways someday – that’s not important anymore. What’s important is they’ve harmed another person so badly that they have nothing to be proud of. The beginning of their relationship should haunt them for good, whatever they try to pass it for.

    Reply
  185. Neh said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    @Kate:

    mooki knows nothing….. he/she said also that jen and brad met at the telethon and that jen was looking at brad in a picture when brad was not in the room at that moment also said that jen and brad were sitting very close to each other at the telethon answering phones also not true and this came from his/her sources LMAO

    Reply
  186. Brad wearing wedding band? said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:19 pm

    Brad Pitt — Lord of the Ring
    Posted Feb 21st 2010 12:39AM by TMZ Staff

    Brad Pitt was spotted in Italy this weekend wearing a ring on his right hand …. that kinda looks like a wedding band.

    Yes, wedding rings are typically worn on the left hand — but do Brad and Angie ever do anything by the book?

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2010/02/21/brad-pitt-ring-photo/#ixzz0gCv79a6L

    There is a picture there froms his ring

    Reply
  187. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    @Tamara:
    Hard to say, Jen has not hooked up with anyone after all these years, and her and Brad have from what is rumored have talked off and on for awhile now about working things out. She is 41 years old, as one gets older it just gets that much harder to find the one, and if Brad was the one, well..it makes it impossible. I have known women like that to never ever remarry or ever even hook up again in a serious relationship because they still love their ex-husband. They are just living life alone, and loving him. They did not have the option to go back, so IF she does still love him, I would find it hard to believe that when this drama with AJ is said and done, that she would just take a pass and live her life out alone. It is difficult place to be when one has been hurt , and not just hurt, but almost destroyed. The karma has come around though and Brad too now has been there, so they are in the same boat, except she has risen above it. That puts her at a cross roads right now, which is what I meant about her image, (he could be a risk now, not so much a few years down the line) so time will tell. Everyone loves a fairytale ending, and if Jen does not find her knight, she has to come up with something or stand for something..jmo

    Reply
  188. Tamara said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:33 pm

    @Kate:
    It would be difficult thought wouldn’t it? After what he put her through, I could see them being best buddies, but not husband and wife again, how does one get past what he did to her so publicly?

    Reply
  189. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    @Kate:

    Yes and I’m amazed that they can’t see that. What do they think, that they can just FORCE people to believe they are still together? That the more photo opps they do, the more they will enforce this opinion? I mean, how arrogant do you have to be to think you can do that? I’ve said it before, the best way of counteracting these stories would have been to lay low for a while and appear to be carrying on as normal without rising to it all. Instead they’ve been out on the town practically every night since Ian’s book came out and she’s been chasing him round the world like a lunatic, showing up at events she wasn’t invited to, flinging her arms around the nearest available icon or disaster victim and looking absolutely desperate in the process! It just won’t work Brad and Angelina, you are both trying too hard. You should have styled it out. Instead you’ve both made yourselves look like a right couple of muppets. Hotel bang slap in the middle of Venice that you can only get out of by boat indeed, it’s ridiculous! Just two celebs trying to mind their own business in one of the most famous cities in the world hey? Yeah right!

    Reply
  190. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    @Tamara:

    I get the impression that a lot of celebrity relationships are accepted as being open from the off and it is more abnormal than normal for both partners in these relationships to be faithful. I doubt Angelina was his ifrst fling so I don’t think that would be the problem as such, more the way he allowed his new bit of stuff to so publicly trash her and try to destroy her career without so much as a word in her defence. Yep, I could see that causing a bit of long-term bitterness and resentment don’t you? It sure as hell would piss off me!

    Reply
  191. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:47 pm

    @Reality Check:
    so true, I don’t feel quite that harsh about Brad, because I truly believe he does want out of this mess, is sorry for all that he put his ex through, that he wants the best for his children, but his hands are tied, because of her, because of Plan B and his projects, and the people he is owned by. Brad is bigger than life in the industry, regardless of what anyone thinks of him, he is, $$$, and he not going to throw if all away now. I know many think he will sink, not in a million years. This is the boy that said, “I am going to be a famous movie star” when he was nothing but bumpkin. He is self made in many respects and every bit as savvy and Jen and Jolie. His only problem is now, is it is not just him, it is Brad plus six. That imo is why he looks the way he does. He is stuck emotionally, ethically, by soul and heart. It has to be hard to give them all up. His freedom from her and be happy and lose his children, or stay and be miserable. What would you do? I would probably stay.

    Reply
  192. Pattyanne said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    Geesh Kate, that’s like carrying a baby for nine months, then giving birth only to turn it over to the nannies while you go about doing …..wait! That’s Exactly What Angie Does! Ian!!! Has the ho rubbed off on you??@Kate:

    Reply
  193. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    @Tamara:
    I don’t think so, not after things have calmed down. I mean it gets down to what is more important, living alone or loving the one you love…doesn’t it? It gets down to either they genuinely love each other or not, and more than they love their careers..lol..they would be a powerhouse together in the long run..but otoh if they don’t and it has passed them by, best buddies would make a nice business relationship as well and good PR.

    Reply
  194. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    what are you talking about?

    Reply
  195. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    @Kate:

    Surely he will get shared custody in some way though, at least week-ends? I mean, does he really see them for more than two full days a week now anyway? I highly doubt it. Two whole days with the kids a week and a life free from Jolie for good? If I were Brad I would take that option!

    Reply
  196. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Well I can’t imagine they would stay anywhere else besides the Denali with the family, for convenience and it is the nicest place to stay, but hardly a place for kids.

    I think Brad is fully aware that people understand it is all show, but he is pissed off and the paps and just saying, a big FU. and that is all it is. She lovey dovey interviews coming out, and he needs TOL to premier well at Cannes. He is working right now,lol.

    EOS

    Reply
  197. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 5:00 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    You really think she will keep the kids in the USA..that would be a bit hard if she is in Europe and he is in LA, and even it they write up that way so she has to, you know she will not abide by that, and to enforce it means another circus in court.

    Reply
  198. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 21st, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    @Kate:

    Well, I just think the man looks miserable, is all this nonsense really worth it to him? What’s happened to being strong and taking a few risks to stand by your ethics? I can’t bear the fact that there are so many morally and ethically compromised people in the world., everyone seems to choose their career over what they believe in nowadays, even when they have enough cash to never have to work again. I just hate seeing people be such wusses and not standing up for what is right.

    Reply
  199. Pattyanne said on February 21st, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    http://www.popsugar.com/

    Photos of Angie the kids, Brad and Jon Voight in Venice. The photo of Voight with his daughter shows Voight looking very concerned at his daughter the ho. One shot of Z she’s looking at her grandfathter like “who the ell are YOU!”….LOL. Gotta hand it to Z, she takes no prisoners…. Pure photo op staged to refute the news of their breakup. TMZ has a macro shot of Brad in the villa looking out the same window they have all used for telephoto opportunities for the paps….gasp! Wearing a silver band on his ring finger right hand…holy smoke!!! What does that mean….(being facetious here), the paps are drooling over this tidbit also. In scoping out the entertainment news photos of today, I came across one of Brad lifting Shiloh into the now famous river boat of the Jolie-Pitt’s choice while in Italy…..and noted that Shiloh does not resemble the “mystery child” of the much discussed controversial photo last week. Strange, so much strangeness surrounding Jolie-Pitts…..mmmmmmm

    Reply
  200. Pattyanne said on February 21st, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    BRAVO Keane~! It’s all about personal integrity. People need to take a stand for right, and not give in like whiney azzed idiots to those who hold the pursestrings. If we all did that, there would be no society today as we know it, and actually there barely is now! I was raised by a very moral Irish Catholic family, and although I don’t actively participate in the Holy Mass today, I still hold true to those values instilled in me …. in fact I cherrsh them. My integrity means more to me than money can buy. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  201. Pattyanne said on February 21st, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    LOL, Kate I’m talking about Ian who disappears soon after his big story opens. I would like to think he would share with us here what he is privy to at this point, other than enemas that is. Surely he could drop us a hint or two about what’s transpiring in Venice? Did he have a heads up on Voight showing up in Venice? Has his insider in the Jolie-Pitt household given him any more information about the stall on the announcement of official separation? and/or the law suit they supposedly filed against Murdoc? Gosh darnit~! I have an enquiring mind and I’d love to know Ian….pretty please?@Kate:

    Reply
  202. Aqueline1 said on February 21st, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    Hi, What amazing comments here!!!.

    Brad and Angelina are showing to the world that they are stronger that ever!!!!….Looking the picture at TMZ, the next announcement is going to be the WEDDING!!!….That’s the reason because Jon Voight is there….Don’t continue dreaming about the break up. Brad is crazy in love with Angie. Don’t make massive suicide with the announcement of the weeding.

    Brangelina FOREVER!!!!.

    Reply
  203. alif said on February 21st, 2010 at 7:25 pm

    Ian may be watching hockey at the Olympics venue.

    Reply
  204. Fangelina said on February 21st, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    @Aqueline1:
    Yes, Yes, Yes. You are right!!!

    Brad Pitt Plays Peacemaker. He is the best guy in the world. I love him. I can not wait to see Brad’s Mom and Dad join to this endless happiness.

    Long live to the King and the Queen.

    Sir IAN…Your next move…Just Disappear!!!!.

    Reply
  205. mooki said on February 21st, 2010 at 7:35 pm

    @Kate:

    actually I haven’t and don’t intend to right now

    Reply
  206. Fangelina said on February 21st, 2010 at 8:11 pm

    @Jf:

    Brangelina, please your last Punch for that guy: WEDDING, WEDDING,WEDDING

    Hey buddy, Brangelina’s Fans demand to you an apologizes for all the garbage that you have been spreading about them, Put your face.

    Reply
  207. Fangelina said on February 21st, 2010 at 8:13 pm

    Brangelina FOREVER, Close this site FOREVER!!!!

    Reply
  208. mooki said on February 21st, 2010 at 8:19 pm

    http://www.tmz.com/2010/02/21/brad-pitt-ring-photo/

    Reply
  209. Silver said on February 21st, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    @Fangelina:

    The problem with the people here is that they don’t understand that SIX children is a big commitment. So Brad is in love with his big family. We are waiting for Jane and Bill Pitt.

    GOD save the King and the Queen!!!

    With the weeding ring, I want to see them Married with Children…They are in Italy so they can go to the Saint Peter’s Cathedral and give to their fans this great GIFT.

    Reply
  210. Odais said on February 21st, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    Well, With all of those pictures and the Ring. I think that the story about the break-up is over!

    Reply
  211. Odais said on February 21st, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    @mooki:

    I am so Sad!!!. I have to tell that: A picture says more than 1000 words!!!…All is over!!.

    Reply
  212. Sugarbaby said on February 21st, 2010 at 9:04 pm

    I don’t understand someone who won’t buy Uggs or consider them fripperies but will buy Lindsay Lohan leggings. A truely astounding waste of money.

    Reply
  213. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 9:16 pm

    @Odais:
    I would very much doubt that. Brad has been wearing that ring before they had the nasty fight in NYC in the restaurant with the cough cough UN Types, lol (lawyers) and that was right before the NOTW broke the story about the contract they signed. means nothing, he has often worn a gold ring on his hand, all the while the rubber sheets were getting a work out. the only thing that will stop the rumors is when they quit trying to stop the rumors. If they are happy, people will see it. They are going overboard, and no one believes it anymore, nor does it matter. Every single person that has been a parent can see right through this. Any mother knows what a relationship is like after 2 years with 2 toddlers, much less, 5 years and 6. They need to put the script away and quit trying so hard. Brad just looks foolish. People expect this behavior from her, but not him.

    Reply
  214. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 9:18 pm

    @mooki:
    no I did not think so , or you would be wise to a few things no to say.

    Reply
  215. Odais said on February 21st, 2010 at 9:37 pm

    @Kate:

    Well, I don’t know. Everything is weird so far!.Now, it is very hard for me believe that all of this is a theater!. Maybe they are giving together a new begining for their relationship. So the time will talk!

    Reply
  216. Kate said on February 21st, 2010 at 9:38 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    ohhhh that okay confused, I am sure IAN will pop in and update us at some point. I doubt seriously they are suing anyone at this point. The wording was threatening and they may have filed it, but I bet we never hear another word about it, just like the last one …pfft…bought them some time for some photo opps with Daddy Warbucks. lol babies and a old ring he has worn for months..psss TMZ get with it.

    Reply
  217. alif said on February 22nd, 2010 at 2:47 am

    I have a strong suspicion that TMZ is also controlled by Brangie!

    Remember that Brad Pitt was quoted as saying that he’d marry, when gays can get married.
    TMZ did not mention this one little detail in its Brad Pitt photo-op!

    Reply
  218. alif said on February 22nd, 2010 at 2:51 am

    ITA!
    The photo on this thread is photoshopped!

    Reply
  219. jan/sa said on February 22nd, 2010 at 3:53 am

    sorry folks but i have the impression that this circus will last at least another 5 years before there is any break-up of these two. would not be surprised if they got married soon to stop all this break-up stories. peewee is exactly where he wants to be in the lime light and making as much money out of this as possible. i expect at least 3 more kids to be added to this trainwreck and you must remember in 4 years peewee will be 50 loking 60 so he needs this and her to stay revalent. althought he looks like a man that does not care anymore and as he is balless he will stay until she kicks him to the curb which she will most likely not do as she is in control and he has become the female in this relationship
    jen i think has moved on long ago and as she never responds or threatens to sue about all the rubbish it shows she really could not care about this traingle. i wonder what is ian take on this as he and quite a few predicted them splitting this year and i really do not see this happening i think this has just pushed them further together to prove the world wrong. no matter how miserable or unhappy they will stick together like glue. jmo

    Reply
  220. JinxieGal said on February 22nd, 2010 at 5:11 am

    I think the document they signed in Jan could turn out to be a Pre-Nup

    Reply
  221. Reality Check said on February 22nd, 2010 at 5:48 am

    @Kate:

    You are right, Kate – I would stay, too. He’s doing the right thing for the kids. The problem is I so much want to see Jolie lose everything she’s built on lies, sexual manipulation, smear campaigns and every trick in her whorish book. She deserves to fall back to the level where she was before she came between Brad and Jen. Do you know what my first thought was when I learned that their split was caused by her? “Who the hell she thinks she is to even contemplate being with him? Doesn’t she know what her history looks like? She must be crazy!” Well, crazy she is.

    If she at least didn’t taunt Jen with interviews about how she found happiness with her husband, the pregnancy sex, the beautiful babies, every single detail of her life around HIS kids, I wouldn’t hate her so much. She has nothing to do with the most basic female (as well as human) qualities – empathy, compassion, understanding, tact, the ability to understand what a fellow human being feels when in pain. She doesn’t think about anyone and anything but her own interests – and once they are achieved, she proceeds to taunt the woman she robbed of everything. She did it even though she knew that Jen lost her two babies.

    I’d be the first to propose a toast to her downfall when it happens. In a sense, it is good that she climbed so high because the higher you get, the longer and more painfully you fall.

    Reply
  222. Odais said on February 22nd, 2010 at 6:15 am

    @JinxieGal:

    Yes, it is sad, but it was that I thought yesterday when I saw the pictures with JV and Brad with the ring.
    I think they are preparing the wedding, don’t be surprised if the next step is a wedding in Italy like Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes.

    Reply
  223. Odais said on February 22nd, 2010 at 6:36 am

    @Odais:

    By the way, I never check Just Jared, but yesterday (by error) I got into the comments section and I read some of them, there are several cracking jokes about Ian and JA too.

    I really hope that she can work to get out of this triangle and her PR’s staff really does a good job to help her at that time.

    Reply
  224. Mili said on February 22nd, 2010 at 6:52 am

    Ryan Phillippe and Abbie Cornish have ended their relationship.

    First Reese broke-up with Jake and now Ryan!

    Come back for them?

    Reply
  225. ooops said on February 22nd, 2010 at 7:18 am

    hhhaaa I don’t think it is a new wedding ring .It is probably his old weeding ring .Oh poor boy he is missing Jen that much ..I have noticed that there is no one pic of Johnny there but there are dozen of pics for those stupids how come Johnny managed to stay out of the radar but Brangelina caught coming and going easily ???????I mean are they that desperate to call paps to come and get the pics of the happiest family on earth …..Brangelina are so over .

    Reply
  226. mooki said on February 22nd, 2010 at 7:52 am

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1252775/Baftas-2010-My-Prince-Charming-Even-Vanessa-Redgrave-bends-knee-William.html

    this coming from a woman who said she’d never be knighted a Dame.

    also, Charlize Theron apparently has gone Kabbalah:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1252546/KATIE-NICHOLL-Charlize-puts-faith-Kabbalah.html

    Reply
  227. Mili said on February 22nd, 2010 at 8:36 am

    @Odais:

    Unfortunately. I think you are right. Despite of Brad has said that he and angelina will get married when gays can get married, all the pressure about the break up has put a lot of pressure on them, so they are desperated to put the rumors down. I have the bad feeling that It will be the next step. I am checking People Mag for the announcement (soon). I am sad like you. That man is not thinking, he just follows her like a dog!

    Reply
  228. Odais said on February 22nd, 2010 at 9:34 am

    @Mili:

    You said: “He just follows her like a dog!”. You are right. I remember an interview when he said: I do anything for love!. and that’s what he has done: He broke with sweet Jen and has humilliated her in a big way and he does whatever Angelina wants. He seems her servant licking her feet. Yes, you are so right, he is a Dog!!!.

    I don’t know how Jen can still talk to him!!!

    Reply
  229. Emerson said on February 22nd, 2010 at 9:48 am

    @Pattyanne:
    how did I miss all the pregnancies?? Very interesting!

    Reply
  230. Jalyn said on February 22nd, 2010 at 9:54 am

    well i too would be extrememly disappointed if they
    marry but if brad is that dumb, if he isn’t at the
    bottome of the barrel yet….guess we’ll just have
    to enjoy the show and see just how low they can
    go.

    angelina disgusts me completely. everytime i see
    her picture i look for the most beautiful woman
    in the world but don’t see it….she looks uglier
    and uglier every time i see a pic of these two.

    i am pretty convinced noone else will have either
    of these two…they almost have to stay with
    each other. that must be a comforting thought.

    and ian, can’t we have a new thread? this one
    has run it’s course.

    Reply
  231. Jalyn said on February 22nd, 2010 at 10:01 am

    read a couple articles on this:

    padma lakshmi has baby; will not identify father

    one on dlisted; one on radaronline

    she rather resembles angelina to me…could this
    be brads baby??????

    Reply
  232. Emerson said on February 22nd, 2010 at 10:12 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I personally cannot imagine how people can look at all of these oh so candid “family having fun” pics and still think they are together, lol, I mean, come on now people! I think Angie is in full on freak out mode after seeing the real news leak of the arrangement both her and Brad now admit to signing in early January, and has now resorted to pulling out all her guns, so to say, and what better way than to show the “happy” and “together” family in Italy! Plus extra props go to the twins! Put out there just when needed, but then, uh oh, the whole World saw her neck! OH NO!! They first tried the whole “photoshopped” absurdity, which did not work, so what dierction next? UH, let’s bring out dear old Dad!!! That got a little blip, so let’s go one step further and force all those news stories about Jennifer! Deflect, deflect, deflect! I mean, not sure if you happened to see Billy Bush of Access Hollywood fame, almost come to tears the week all those big “meanies” were reporting the demise of America’s golden couple? The oscar goes to….it was that pathetic! So, yes, I believe very much that these websites/news shows no let me change that to “entertainment” news shows are, if not owned in some form, given strict orders that if you saw certain things about me/us, we will no longer appear on your program, or give photo’s of our beeautiful babies, etc. This also explains why online sites such as TMZ, Radaronline, etc., step back and play along as well. I think Angelina is spinning out of control and stupid Brad is just along for the ride, looking the giant fool. OH, and not sure if you saw or noticed this, that one of those “Venice pics” showed Angelina and Brad go into a store that sells liquor so that Brad can get his fix ;) and I am SURE that was also planned by the new “Hitler” so that in a few months from now she can say…see, see everyone! A family planned vacation and Brad could not stay away from his fix! He is an alcoholic! How am I supposed to deal with all the alcohol/pot smoking? She is in full on crisis mode and now wearing her hair to cover fully her turkey neck, staging more photo ops, and planting news stories…hmmm…it reeks of desparation to this non fan…btw, I too did not understand a word of the post above asking you to respond to it? Perhaps Mia/Lori/guest123 has been drinking?

    Reply
  233. lory said on February 22nd, 2010 at 10:58 am

    @Reality Check:

    See you reveal yourself as a fan of the former Golden Couple unable to accept the fact that their marriage was divorced 5 years ago. Wether or not they had problems before Pitt got involved with Jolie we don`t know -also the NE claims that they had troubles (see “he is not really THE love of my love but A love” infamous saying by Jen and them not seeing eachother for 6 MONTHS during the Troy shoot. Just as well we don`t know wether or not she was ever pregnant because if we believe the tabs she should have had at least 20 kids. Her rep has clearly denied the first pregnancy rumor which occured when her character on friends was supposed to be pregnant. The second time there was a buzz was in early 2004 well there is not one picture in 2004 were she looks even slightly bigger. Actually in her bikini pix in Cannes 2004 she looks super thin! And even if she became pregnant we don`t know what caused the loss. Are you going to blame Cox`s husband that she lost the baby? Do you see were this leads to? Stop making assumptions and get back to the facts!

    Reply
  234. vi said on February 22nd, 2010 at 11:15 am

    Brangelina will never break up as long as they have control over the media. Once they lose it, they will break up because they won’t see any reason to stay together.

    Reply
  235. ooops said on February 22nd, 2010 at 11:27 am

    That is Ted :
    Dear Ted:
    Just wondering why Brad and Angie would stay together if things really are so bad between them? They are both successful individuals and if they aren’t happy they shouldn’t be together, so why are they sticking it out? And don’t you think the press—not you, my honey—aren’t helping them much by printing negative stories about them? Couldn’t that push them into separating?
    —Dana

    Dear Not So Simple:
    Haven’t you heard of staying together for the kids? Especially when there is a whole pack of them! But Ange would never let a breakup happen on the tabloids’ time; she’ll make sure that if it happens it goes down exactly when, where, and how she wants it to. Plus, never said they’re miserable together. Surely good sex counts for something.

    Reply
  236. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 11:45 am

    Yes, learning about the two miscarriages, and the $300,000 nursery that Brad and Jen were building in their home in 2004 was a shock to many. Jolie knew how to put out a spin to deflect from her guilt to making Jennifer appear to be less than what she actually is. It’s a great talent shared by many sociopaths such as Jolie. Unfortunately for her, the public is aware of her trickery, and will not easily fall into her lies any more.@Emerson:

    Reply
  237. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 11:56 am

    Source Brangelina:The Untold Story, Page 227
    ” In June 2004, MSNBC reported that an inside source told them that Aniston was pregnant and that an announcement was expected later that month. It was a little over a month after Aniston had flown to meet Pitt at the Cannes film Festival. “This is something Brad and Jen both want,” a source told the networl, More significantly, Aniston’s spokesman refused to deny the report, as would be expected if it weren’t true. Instead, he merely said, “I keep hearing that rumor.” That chapter of Ian’s book covers much more surrounding Jennifer and Brad’s two pregnancies.@lory:

    Reply
  238. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 11:59 am

    I used to think that too vi, but the more I’ve searched out articles, and read on blogs I’ve come to believe it’s the wild monkey sex that keeps these two perverts together. Both are bi, both are into kink, both have a “past” concerning sexual acts gone wrong, and it’s said it was the limitless, no boundaries sex of Mz Jolie that hooked PittY in the first place. He’s surrendered his manhood to the ho, and I don’t believe he is willing to give that up. Perhaps his addiction is to her sex style rather than the alcohol as she tries so hard to convince the world?@vi:

    Reply
  239. Emerson said on February 22nd, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    GOD, I am SO behind! What are the past sexual acts gone wrong? LOL You are right ON target too, I believe Angie is 100% sociopath, it is so apparent in all she does! How anyone can be fooled is beyond me…and sadly Brad is just a shell of the man he used to be. It makes me wonder, where are all his friends? Wouldn’t you try to reach out to your friend if you saw them in a downward spiral? Of course, Angie probably has managed to isolate him in that manner as well…and seriouslly, when has his family EVER been a part of their union? I think I have seen maybe 1 or 2 photo ops, maybe that many. I just respect Jennifer Aniston so much more for the class she surrounded herself with after the split….and I could never understand Angie’s insane jealousy where Jennifer was concerned, but now knowing that Jennifer indeed was pregnant really explains that better as well…

    Reply
  240. vi said on February 22nd, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    @pattyanne
    Yeah, that could be it. But, that woman looks gross from head to toe with clothes on, so I can only imagine what she looks like naked. I hate to sound like one of those body language experts but their public photos show them looking distant. No lovey dovey looks, no grabbing and gropping, no whispering of sweet nothings in each others ear. They barely look like they talk let alone have sex. IDK, you probably are right, though. With these two, anything is possible.

    Reply
  241. Reality Check said on February 22nd, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    @lory:

    Bitch,

    I have never tried to hide the fact that I’m a fan of the former golden couple. I have always been happy and proud to be their fan since the first day I knew they were together. I will never stop being their fan and I have always paraded it since they broke up. In fact, I have been at war for the last five years against the total idiots like you, who have no moral standards and make terrible insults about Jennifer Aniston just because they think she’s less attractive than Jolie. I have suffered horrible insults myself just because I said I didn’t understand why she should be hated at all. All that makes me even more determined to continue writing against Jolie because someone has to counter this madness no matter what!

    In case you didn’t notice, this blog is a place for those who ARE the fans of the former golden couple. In this sense, you have come to the wrong place. Nobody needs you here. Nobody will be convinced by your points. Nobody cares about your points. You don’t even have the power to annoy me. The only reason I paid attention to your post is you seem not to understand that the people here don’t need to hide their liking of Jennifer Aniston and what she had with Brad Pitt. You must be thoroughly confused if you imagine that anybody should hide it on this blog.

    Reply
  242. Kate said on February 22nd, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    okay well the circus continues, and now they have the loons believing they are getting married. lordy, well if Brad is stupid enough to piss off his gay fans, by all means. lmao. go brother, you can’t look anymore miserable than you do, and that would give you a better shot at custody. I say go for it. Career suicide.

    “we will not get married until everyone can get married” eat those words.. ha ha.

    what about this do the loons not understand? he is in a corner, even if he wanted to, he can’t.

    Does anyone believe she really even wants him? no, all posturing jmo. Cannes is just around the corner.

    None of this will make the rubber sheets go away, and about the time thing settle down, Morton will be on his PR rounds.

    Entertaining. for sure. I think they just do not want the paps to be right or IAN or TED. Gotta save face.

    Must say those twins are adorable.

    Reply
  243. pickwick said on February 22nd, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    @Mili:
    Abbie somehow got a career out of dating Ryan Phillipe. Too bad he can’t get one for himself.

    Reply
  244. pickwick said on February 22nd, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    Does anyone think Alec Baldwin never got over Kim Basinger? He still seems obsessed with her. He’s way too angry after all these years, which can only come if you have strong feelings. He’s far from indifferent, and he doesn’t settle down with anyone. She never remarried, either.

    I remember once when she was on David Letterman, Baldwin crept up on the stage and wasn’t supposed to be there. I think he’ll never, ever get over the end of that relationship and his feelings for his daughter are all bound up in his feelings for his ex. He expresses his frustration and hurt in anger.

    Reply
  245. pickwick said on February 22nd, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    Oh, btw, I was reading through comments about how Jen and Brad have not married again, and it made me think about Alec and Kim never remarrying. Thought I’d throw that in because I know I brought in Baldwin out of nowhere.
    I was thinking about him lately because his career is going so well—the movie “It’s Complicated”, his work on “30 Rock” and I think he’s hosting a big award show. Oh, and he is the voice for the Philharmonic.
    But then there was some incident the other day with his daughter fearing for his life and calling 911.

    Reply
  246. pickwick said on February 22nd, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    @Kate:
    I am not one to think that Jen and Brad are ever getting back together. But I can’t help but notice—anyone can—that if they are in the same room they both look uncomfortable and they look like they still care about each other on some level. I’m no body language expert, but I think they are so obvious it’s easy to see. Same with the body language and expressions on Brad and Angie. I liked reading the body language expert assessment, but you just have to have lived a few years to see that they are not getting along at the moment.
    Even those old photos of Brad and Jen right before it ended when he wore that “Trash” shirt were more loving than anything I’m seeing from him and Angie in Venice.

    Reply
  247. Emerson said on February 22nd, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    @Reality Check:
    I’ll second that…and where exactly is Lori basing her “facts” and I hate to use that term, but please? It sounds to me like she either a. work for the Jolie-Pitt’s or b. is their manager/spokesperson, lol, I mean what are the facts in re. to Brangelina? The Jolie-Pitt’s cannot even live truth, in any sense of the word, things change from day to day based on what they see the media reacting to….having a negative story written about them? Well, let’s parade out those rarely seen twins! Angie’s turkey neck is showing her obvious plastic surgery’s (at the age of 34 no less!), let’s bring out dear old Dad!! What’s up next? A mystery ring!! Master manipulators, go Lori go!!

    Reply
  248. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    Not to sound like I’m shilling for Ian Haleprin, but he published a book recently titled, “Brangelina: The Untold Story” which is filled with facts relating to Jolie, events surrounding Brad and Jen and so much more. It’s all true and documented as proven by the lack of any law suits brought by Jolie’s representatives. Well worth the read. Basically it puts the events leading to Brangelina’’s birth into order so you feel as if you are watching events unfold, makes things a lot clearer to those who , like me, didn’t follow the gossip sites, blogs, or tv entertainment programs pre Brangelina. It’s a good read! Most library’s have it I think.@Emerson:

    Reply
  249. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 22nd, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    @lory:

    Oh the facts Mia, the FACTS, silly me I almost forgot, thanks so much for reminding me! How are you doing with your facts lately Mia – did you manage to straighten them out in the end? So repeat after me:

    1) The UNHCR is an agency of the UN, i.e. part of it, not an entirely different organisation.
    2) I did not meet Bill Clinton for any reason to do with his daughter Chelsea as we did not go to the same college.
    3) And finally, the last time Mia met a president was: ………………… and the reason she was granted this honour was:…………………… (Please fill in the blanks so we can keep updated on all the facts).

    So are you with me on all this now Mia? Only, you’ve been AWFULLY quiet lately!

    Reply
  250. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    Oh I totally agree with you vi, there is no love in their relationship what ever it is. But they both have admitted to using their preferred drug of choice, and are highly sexual beings; it follows with so much we’ve read during the past year that it’s their base lusts that keep them together. Unfortunately many people don’t find it necessary to be “in love” with their sexual partner in order to preform, however, many perverts and sociopaths have no empathy for whomever they desire to share their body parts with. No guilt, no remorse, just pure lust and perversion. Remember the story told recently by the maid Anna Kiminsky? No legal action was taken against her for the telling, and no legal action was taken to those who published her story …right? Well that involved Angelina Jolie who we all know was staying at the hotel in NYC while Brad, the nannies and the kiddies were in the estate on Long Island…..the maid was called into the room after Jolie checked out to see what Jolie had left behind; black rubber sheet on the bed, the bed filled with sexual toys, the bathroom soaked in a lake of water with not one dry towel in the room. Very telling in itself don’t you think? Brad HAS to know about these excursions…yet he remains?, Shiloh’s teeth knocked out? yet he remains, and so many more details that a normal , real man, would leave his partner over. AND fight for custody!!! If there wasn’t more holding him there. JMO@vi:

    Reply
  251. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 22nd, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    @Kate:

    I’m sorry but it would make my year if they got married – seriously wouldn’t you like to see this happen? It would just be hilarious right now! Angelina walking down the aisle trying her hardest to look like the cat that got the cream, rather than the cat that got the leftovers from the homeless shelter, and Brad trying to look grimly happy like he got the prize calf rather than the prize turkey (neck). Oh it would be hilarious, please God let it happen! And you can just imagine those six poor ragamuffin children dressed up as little page boys (Maddox, Pax, Knox and Shiloh) of course, with Zahara and Viv as the maids. Good old Jon Voight could give her away and James would be her Matron of Honour. And then it would be a toss-up for who would be the best man out of Tarantino or Clooney, either way it would be a feast for the eyes! Please someone in the magazine world offer this family a tonne of dollars (the only thing that motivates them) to do this, please! It will be the most romantic celebration of HW royalty since Katie Price nailed her colours to the mast (or whatever the expression is) with Peter Andre. Please dear Lord, make all my wishes come true and make this happen, just for a day, it would be so exquisite. Ladies, will you join me in my prayer that one day we will see this most magical of ceremonies? Just think, a few years ago, people would have viewed this as the glorious apotheosis of celebrity royal weddings. Now they would just think what a joke!

    BTW, I noticed Kate Winslet was doing a little bit of sucking up to old Angie pants the other day. Saying she looks “stunning on the red carpet as we all know” in an interview. I guess she had a bit of making up to do after shaming her at the Oscars hey? Aren’t they all scared of Angie now – ridiculous!

    Reply
  252. sela said on February 22nd, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    @Keane – Very Funny! Wedding Dress …. Black or White?

    New photos in Venice – The twins, especially Knox, look less bright eyed (something ?) (I’m not sure what? – can’t put my finger on it) than the other children. Photos of Shiloh at the twin’s current age (making the comparison with Shiloh because she is the biological marker) showed her looking more engaged with her surroundings and the people around her. Both the twins have dark circles under their eyes. Maybe it is just a result of being the youngest children in this tribe with less one-on-one time with parents, or not spending as much time outdoors, or allergies, or ?? Any thoughts?
    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/22/brad-pitt-angelina-jolies-twins-from-venice-to-paris/#more-544987

    Reply
  253. Emerson said on February 22nd, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I’m def on it this week, have been itching for awhile now! Ever since I found this site, which I LOVE btw, because I was sooo tired from the generic “Brad and Angelina are in love!” etc. etc. that fills all the entertainment media…

    Reply
  254. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    Amen to that Em@Emerson:

    Reply
  255. alif said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @ooops:
    Could Ted C. be on Brangie’s payroll?
    Could he be that naive?
    Does AJ control E Online; and therefore, Ted C.?

    Okay, any celeb can get “good sex”. It’s available all over the place!
    I just don’t see any great passion between these two.
    They talk the talk; they just don’t walk the walk. Besides, remember the old saying: When a couple over demonstrates their sexual attraction in public; it means they’re fighting in private”.

    Reply
  256. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:07 pm

    Publicity, manipulation of, misdirection, oh woe is me, what do I do now? Ah Ha! Wedding? Another pregnancy (oh where did I put that baster?), miscarriage (no, can’t Jen did that), sudden illness? (nope, have to start the new film soon)…..decisions, decisions, decisions….must be tough to be Angelina Jolie these days. Well, for what it’s worth, there will always be the black rubber sheets and pleanty of willing partners into that S & M chyt…(teehee, pun intended)

    Reply
  257. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:10 pm

    OT~! Just saw Law Abiding Citizen and it’s a must see!! Thriller, chiller, and whammo action packed! Looks like we have a new action hero now. Rock on Gerard Butler…

    Reply
  258. Tamara said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    @Reality Check:
    Ohhhhhhhh SNAP! hahaha

    Reply
  259. Tamara said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    What? Not the My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding? haha

    Reply
  260. Tamara said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Which reminds me did you see that Child Services were called to Charlie Sheens house because Brooke has gone into rehab for crack and Charlie is joined at the hip by a “preventer” to keep his drinking in moderation and oh yae the little thing about the knife to the throat on XMas day? What….this is mild stuff compared to what we’ve heard about the Jolie Pitt household! Neither one of them have a “preventer”, knives are given to 4 year olds for birthday presents, and crack is whack, heroin is in!! WTF…..????

    Reply
  261. alif said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    And I add: AJ takes hostages; and Braddie is her latest! lol!

    Reply
  262. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    @Tamara:

    That’s how I’m picturing it! Lol

    Reply
  263. mooki said on February 22nd, 2010 at 4:39 pm

    oh how cute, Miley and Zac Efron are presenting @ the Oscars this year. coincidence that ABC is broadcasting the ceremonies (they probably got them for free!)

    Reply
  264. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    That must be why they maintain their primary residence outside the US. How they’ve gotten away with so much for so long is obvious….Loons In Office. sigh@Tamara:

    Reply
  265. Pattyanne said on February 22nd, 2010 at 5:25 pm

    In a way I guess, but I still think Braddy is addicted to her S&M, rubber sheet sex life where if two is good, three must be better!! Fantastic for an admitted bi.@alif:

    Reply
  266. Oooh la la said on February 22nd, 2010 at 7:23 pm

    @sela:
    If you look closely at Knox, his head is really big and it’s shaped very strangely too. It looks like there is something on his head under the beanie. Compare his head size and shape to Viv’s– her head looks round and normal under the beanie. But his looks suspiciously odd. Hmmmm…….yep that beanie is covering something. Strange.

    Reply
  267. octavia said on February 22nd, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    @Oooh la la:
    I think your right def something strange going on with those kids.I think Angelina is going to reveal their problems for sympathy when her & brad break up.

    Reply
  268. alif said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:09 am

    @Pattyanne:
    I wouldn’t dispute your theory. All the clues seem to fit!
    She’s got so much over him that he has to play her game, her way.
    Hmm…otherwise, the public will get to picture BP in diapers?

    She has him hostage, just like TC has Katie hostage!
    She probably borrowed TomKat’s tactic of a fake pregnancy. (For Katie, it was widely speculated that she had already given birth; but the timing wasn’t right for Tommy to be assumed the father. So, the resultant fake pregnancy.)
    The above topic was thoroughly discussed on Defamer.com a couple of yrs ago. Just about everybody felt K didn’t carry TC’s child; that TC couldn’t father children because of acquired std’s when he was a hustler.
    Another theory was that he wasn’t virile enough to sire children.
    Then, Defamer.com became a rather tame site. Did Scientologists get to them? There had been mysterious deaths of sources that claimed to have proof of TC’s gay activities.

    Reply
  269. mooki said on February 23rd, 2010 at 6:20 am

    @alif:

    Defamer is owned by Gawker… who isn’t tame at all.

    Aussie news show Today Tonight exposed the Scilons the last two nights, w/ c-listers Nancy Cartwright (Bart Simpson’s voice), Marisol Nichols, Anne Archer (Tommy Davis’s mother) and Erika Christensen looking like total idiots:
    http://www.xenutv.com/blog/?p=4337

    Reply
  270. mooki said on February 23rd, 2010 at 8:24 am

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/2862537/Lindsay-on-her-booze-and-drugs-hell.html

    anyone wanna be she’s fully sober?

    Reply
  271. ooops said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:29 am

    Here is Angelina looks stunning (hhhhaa yeah) according to Just Jared while shooting her new movie in Paris
    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/23/angelina-jolie-takes-on-the-tourist/

    Reply
  272. HisHighness said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:32 am

    @Kate:
    Just going through a crisis with a friend…will be back soon. Hope all is well.

    Reply
  273. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 10:41 am

    I am laughing as I look at all the stills from Angelina’s Paris shoot for her new movie…notice that her turkey neck side is not showing in any of them? LOL Great way to start the day…

    Reply
  274. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 11:27 am

    Just another rerun of the same accent or the same acting no matter what the role is. She was the same in AMH as she was in Alexander, as she was in Wanted. She’s a “Johnny One Note”.@Emerson:

    Reply
  275. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 11:28 am

    IMO it’s all the tabloid fodder and notority that gives her jobs in HW. Certainly not for her acting skills.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  276. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 11:30 am

    notoriEty , sorry for the typo, as if it would matter to most normal people. LOL@Pattyanne:E

    Reply
  277. Shiloh said on February 23rd, 2010 at 11:47 am

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/shiloh-s-new-hair-cut-revealed-t248676.html

    Pictures of Shiloh with new haircut

    Reply
  278. lurkeyloo said on February 23rd, 2010 at 12:09 pm

    Well…I’ve gone and gotten myself banned from JJ….and all I said was that she looked stunning for a 50 year old. I didn’t even mention her gills!!! ;o)

    Reply
  279. Tamara said on February 23rd, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    @lurkeyloo:
    hahaha At least you didn’t say a 50 year old Goldfish! LOL No, seriously, they banned you, for real? What, you aren’t allowed to have an opposing opinion on JJ? I never knew that, I don’t read there anyway so thats why, but WOW that seems extreme!

    Reply
  280. lurkeyloo said on February 23rd, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    Looks like it…my original comment was deleted and it won’t let me post another. @Tamara:

    Reply
  281. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    LOLOL….well considering JJ posted a photo today of Brad with Shiloh and Zahara and identified the 20 month old Knox at the nearly 3 year old Shiloh….I wouldn’t worry about it too much, in fact you deserve a medal!@lurkeyloo:

    Reply
  282. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    Oh Tam, extreme is saying it mildly. JJ is home planet to the entire LOONatic Population of planet Earth! They worship false idols there….wink!!@Tamara:

    Reply
  283. octavia said on February 23rd, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    Latest Angelina pics….yuck she looks old & mean!
    http://www.dlisted.com/node/36198

    Reply
  284. Is it the triangle? said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    Tuesday, February 23, 2010
    Tuesday Blind Item

    This couple seem to have it all. Perfect family, magazine covers, and a fan following that would follow them into the pits of hell. They seem to be perfect, but the story doesn’t about them. See the man used to be married to a beautiful actress who believed that they were in it for the long haul. She had no idea that her PR and his PR had arranged for them to be the Hollywood “it” couple. The reason? He liked boys and she had no idea. And the PR teams knew that the two of them together would be an explosion of epic proportions. He begged her for a family to help keep his image, but she wanted to enjoy being a newly wed without kids to worry about. Plus she still liked to have some fun, the herbal kind. And she knew when she became a mom she would have to grow up and she wasn’t ready.

    He got bored being a loving husband began hooking up with his best guy friend. She finally caught on and he told her that if she wanted to keep her status she would go along with it. She actually considered it, but because she loved him and thought she could change him. HA, don’t they all. So she agreed and they went on a vacation, but he couldn’t stop from the boy loving and once she found out that his “buddy” was also near by, she was done. He was worried that she would spill, so not only did he leave her, he spun a whole new story so that even if she did out him, it would appear to be out of vengeance.

    Now he is off, living a Hollywood dream with another beard, one that is so into the Hollywood game that she should crowned as Queen. Funny thing is though, he has him so whipped that he no longer even talks to the guy that used to be his best friend because while filming their last movie together, she heard all about their trailer hook-ups between scenes..

    It’s Not
    George Clooney and Elisabetta Canalis

    Reply
  285. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    You got that right..in fact, I don’t think I’ve ever watched an Angelina movie and liked it…hmmmm, interesting, oh I did like Girl Interrupted, but then again, she was playing herself ;)

    Reply
  286. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:15 pm

    @lurkeyloo:
    that is just starting to get a little scary! How in the h*** do they get the media to bow down to them? I want someone ANYONE to actually try to do an honest investigation into this, where are all the political vetters??? There are not any elections coming up are there? hahaha

    Reply
  287. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    @octavia:
    Hair pulled back on left side of head, let loose on right side…hahahaha, she’s not fooling anyone!

    Reply
  288. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    http://www.popsugar.com/Photos-Brad-Pitt-Shopping-Bonpoint-Paris-Zahara-Jolie-Pitt-Shy-Shiloh-Jolie-Pitt-7513843

    Apparently Shiloh is on the receiving end of Angie’s displeasure over worldwide confusion of the identity of “the mystery child” Brad was seen carrying on the Venice boat trip this past week. Now , on an outing with Dad and sister Zahara, Shiloh removes her knit hat that framed her long brown bangs in the Venice photos, and sports a very boyish haircut. Not even a good female version of the boy cut. Poor Shiloh, confused with Knox her 20 month old sibling, and now made to appear a boy even moreso. It’s heart rendering to look at the photo of Shiloh with her head hanging down, and then on daddy’s lap with her arm around his neck. Brad certainly made a huge mess of his life, and it’s spilling over into the lives of the children. He may have the equipment (tiny though it is), but he is no man in my book!!

    Reply
  289. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    Arghhh….rending!…@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  290. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/02/exclusive-photos-shilohs-shag-brad-angelinas-daughter-shows-boyish-new-do
    Shiloh, 3, with her newly-cropped hair and neat outfit, looked almost like a cute little boy as she browsed the threads at the French store. “

    Reply
  291. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    The only thing I just don’t quite get is how Shiloh’s hair turned brown all of a sudden? While I realize that your hair is sometimes much lighter as a child, it seems so strange that it went from really blond to mousy brown all of a sudden? Please tell me they are not coloring her hair??

    Reply
  292. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    @octavia:

    It’s very Joan Collins chic isn’t it? For a 34 year old, she is looking pretty ancient huh! Quelle surprise…

    Reply
  293. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    Well they’re dressing her like a boy, they’ve cut her hair like a boy, I suspect this means she wants to be a boy. It does happen.

    One thing is for sure, she sure as hell looks like Brad in these pics huh? Now that’s got to count for something…!

    Reply
  294. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    I have no clue, but at this point I would not consider anything impossible where the kids are concerned. It seems a very strong attempt by Jolie to mold Shiloh into the woman SHE wants her to grow up to be rather than what Shiloh , from a very young age, has the development to KNOW what she herself wishes to be. No child from age one has a personal style of dress…none! Yet Jolie put it out there that Shiloh selects her older brother’s clothing to wear. BS~! And now! Shiloh’s silvery blond hair turns mousey brown, and she sports a boy’s haircut??? Jolie is a control freak, but what she is doing to this little girl borders on abuse. This is a deliberate act which will result in yet another dysfunctional HW child. Poor little Shiloh. Seems her father, her grandpa Bill, Grandma Jane, Uncle Doug, Aunt Jane won’t lift a finger to help her. Shiloh is doomed to become a Jenny Shimizu in appearance if Jolie has her way.@Emerson:

    Reply
  295. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:13 pm

    Hell! Most of the three year olds I know don’t even want to wear any clothing! let alone select their own personal style of dress….who has Shiloh seen wearing a long tie that she would even consider worthy of emulating? No one i’ve seen in photos of persons surrounding the family. Why not want to emulate daddy and wear his french beret style of hat rather than that bowler she sports? Now the jeans, shirt and sweater set? Who purchases her clothes? I”m sure Viv and Zahara have jeans and sweater sets that have colors, and ruffles, and lace on them….don’t tell me Shiloh shops for plain button down long sleeved shirts to wear a tie with? This is more of Jolie’s PR. It gets people talking and that is all Jolie cares about….being in the news. Tossing her young daughter out with the bathwater matters not to her as long as she achievees her own goals.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  296. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    alif, this blind item could explain a lot! I’m thinking it’s about The Bermuda Triangle

    http://thegossipboy01.blogspot.com/2010/02/three-for-tuesday-blind-items.html@alif:

    Reply
  297. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    yuck, please don’t tell me who the best friend is…no go ahead and tell me! Is it in Ian’s book too?? GOD, I am so at Barnes & Noble later today! Yes, I do not remember being 2 and 3 years old, and knowing exactly what I wanted to dress as, please? Someone is def putting that thought into Shiloh’s possibly dyed head…

    Reply
  298. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    @Emerson:
    No that’s not in Ian’s book. He could only publish what was within the bounds of legalities for his publishing company. The Brand did their best to stop him, but they could do nothing to stop the truths he managed to get out there, hence the lack of law suits against Brangelins: The Untold Story.

    The link I posted is the source for this Blind Item article. It’s up to the individual to believe or not believe the revelations though, but two guesses as to Brad’s male “friend” are David Fincher, and George Clooney. No way to know for certain though. There is much to find out on the internet. Think of a subject you want to search, and Google it. Sometimes you have to change the wording, or just switch the position of the wordage around to get what you are looking for. It’s fun actually.

    Reply
  299. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    but I’ll go crazy if I google everything ;) lol

    Reply
  300. lurkeyloo said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    Angelina probably chopped off Shiloh’s hair due to her jealousy. She’s the type of woman that couldn’t stand the fact that her daughter takes Daddy’s attention away from her….I mean, the only reason she even HAD Shiloh was to get a firm grasp on ole Braddy boy. Poor little Shiloh…as priveledged as she is on many ways….I’ll bet AJ treats her like Sh**….just wait until she is older….talk about a power struggle between the two of them!!! @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  301. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    I’ve thought that very same thing myself. When Shiloh is in her early teens, what will Angelina’s reaction to having a beautiful daughter be? Consider that Marcia Lynne Bertrand Voight permitted Angie to move in a b/f when just 14…will Angie allow Shiloh to do the same? Will Brad finally grow back his balls to stop this? Is Angie trying to create Lara Croft in her daughter by dressing her in this style? Who knows, but one thing IS certain…..it will all reveal itself with time.@lurkeyloo:

    Reply
  302. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    LOL, I know~! I was recouperating from back surgery in July of last year, so I had months to play around on Google and makes some great finds. It was like Lays Potato Chips, I couldn’t stop at just one….@Emerson:

    Reply
  303. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    @lurkeyloo:
    unfortunately, I agree with you, sad for Shiloh…she is def going to go head to head with her mother…I mean wasn’t it immediately after she was born that Angelina said she felt more for her adopted children who were not born into privilege? I know I remember that from watching something, and I immediately thought uh oh…that is so not a good situation! Then, she gets her tooth knocked out…I mean, ummm, something is def up with poor Shiloh…you would think Aunt I mean Uncle Jamie would be watching over his namesake a little better..

    Reply
  304. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    yuck bad backs! I go for my injections tomorrow, and that’s just a day! I am sure I will be googling all, and I’m thinking David Fincher, only because something has to remain sacred…as in Clooney…haha

    Reply
  305. guest said on February 23rd, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    These pics are strange. Not sure but…
    Shi hair in fifth photo down. Long blond hair sticking out- in Venice.
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/jon-voight-in-venice-t248530.html
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/what-the-hell-are-they-trying-to-pull-with-this-kid-t248431.html
    Maybe the blond hair photo taken when first arrived.Then cut.

    Reply
  306. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2008-11-27-pitt-and-fincher_N.htm
    *exerpt
    Fincher shakes his head. Three movies together, scores of stunts, years of ducking paparazzi, “and this is how he’s going to kill himself.”

    Fincher had better hope not. Since Pitt and the director met 15 years ago, they have become close friends — and crucial components in each other’s professional lives.

    What struck me is the remark “Since Pitt and the director met 15 years ago”…..mmmm, they go way back.@Emerson:

    Reply
  307. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    I am so glad I went for the surgery, although I had no choice as my spine was broken with 99% compression of my spinal cord. I am relatively pain free, within limits of course, and able to do much more now than I was able pre-surgery. My left leg had gone numb, but now It’s normal, so I was blessed that all went well. I must carry a card to pass through scanners, that shows a small x-ray of my spine and the appliances now attached to it. There is hope Em, hope your back never reaches this point, but if it does, there are some excellent surgeons out there. Good Luck!@Emerson:

    Reply
  308. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    If that were true it would explain a great deal. I was only thinking of that SR post from a while back about Brad and Ange being an “ordered couple” like Heidi and Spencer are. Kate also talks about how HW was looking for the “next Bennifer”. That BI explains so much and I would 100% buy it if it weren’t for a couple of things. 1) People on the set of MAMS said they were “f*cking like rabbits” and 2) They made Shiloh. Well, I guess the second one is debatable, could have been via a test tube after all. And after all, the last two definitely were!

    Reply
  309. Tamara said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Hm, so lets see, he’s been with AJ for 5, was with Jen for 7, so it was only 3 years before he met Jen – still the honeymoon stage.

    Reply
  310. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Def David Fincher, lol, way too easy, and 15 years ago Brad wasn’t nearly as famous as he is now…and Fincher is a divorced dad, God why is nothing sacred in Hollywood?! lol I am glad your back is better and I have been too afraid of back surgeries, as I haven’t heard too many good reviews! Did you break it in an accident or was it just something that got worse over time?

    Reply
  311. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:43 pm

    Yep, I know what you are saying here Keane. Brad’s always given off a vibe of wanting to BE the woman more than wanting the woman herself, and I believe that’s why he falls “in love” with different types of women after short periods of time. He morphs into their style, personality, habits, etc., and then feels restless, wants more, so he finds another type of woman to fall in love with and emulate. I can imagine a psychiatrist having a field day with Brad’s gender identity crisis. I’m thinking it’s true. Remember the stories about his early years ? What was it? Something happened to prevent him graduating college in Ks/Mo? This could very well be the “secret” Jolie has over him, and make truth of the rumor of Angie having him wearing diapers during sex play. And what of the architect he roomed with/worked for as pool boy in his early days? Why try so hard to erase that from writen word….so many things to consider about BP@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  312. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    Em, twelve years earlier I was rear ended while stopped at a red light on the highway. My car was totaled, accordian style as I was shoved into the car in front of me. I immediately had acute back pain, but the S-Ray tech said no damage to my back, so I suffered through working for about 8 more years. Finally when my left leg went numb an MRI was ordered and all were shocked at the extent of the damage. I was fortunate it was finally diagnosed, and very happy with the surgery. I had a wonderful surgeon, and am doing great. Just do your research on spinal surgeons, and then make phone calls to check them out …and go for it when it becomes necessary. I’m sure glad I did.@Emerson:

    Reply
  313. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    LOL Tam, yep, it’s Take A Number with Brad Pitt.@Tamara:

    Reply
  314. Emerson said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    wow, I can’t believe it took that long to find out what was going on! I can’t believe they didn’t do an MRI right away! Yep, I am very thorough before I have anything done, so I will def do my research when it comes to that time…and please TMI about Brad and diapers!! Years ago, a person I worked with found the entire club online that does this…some bizarre name, like The Adult Diaper Club, seriouslly, and to me, man, I just never got it, thank God!! Yet I do not doubt anything from Queen Angie! Now I dying to find out why he didn’t graduate either!

    Reply
  315. mooki said on February 23rd, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    http://perezhilton.com/2010-02-23-an-angelina-in-paris

    first photos of Angie on set of the movie she’s doing w/ Depp.

    Reply
  316. Tamara said on February 23rd, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    @Emerson:
    I just googled Fincher and see he wears the same goatee that Brad used to ahem wear. They actually look alot alike. Kind of like how owners and their dogs start to resemble each other after awhile! LOL

    Reply
  317. Tamara said on February 23rd, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    @Emerson:
    Well, except if it was only 3 years before he started dating Jen then yea, he was pretty famous already by then. He’d already done Thelma and Legends etc etc.

    Reply
  318. Real Talk said on February 23rd, 2010 at 6:25 pm

    http://igossip.com/gossip/Angelina_Jolie_really_a_blonde_/1093127

    Here’s an article about Angie’s mom who dyed her hair when she was young. It’s obvious Angie dyed
    Shiloh’s hair. Her hair color should have changed gradually. She is molding her into what she wants.
    She wants three girls and three boys. Three biological and three adopted. One African, two asian, one
    butch and a set of twins. Just my opinion

    Reply
  319. Real Talk said on February 23rd, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    What kind of parent says they prefer one child over the other. I only hear people say that they love all
    of their children. I am worried for Shiloh after reading the message boards and looking closely at pictures.
    I could have sworn that she was a boy in the Venice pics. I knew “it” was too old to be Knox. Only until I saw she with her blanket and a thumb in her mouth that it was Shiloh.
    Thumb sucking is a way to control stress. I know from personal experience. All of her kids look sad to me. Brad is a bitch to allow this. I believe he is a closeted homosexual with all of his morphing into his partners. He has no identity.
    As for Angie, she gives me this creepy sinister vibe. I feel she is evil. I use to buy the story that Brad left Jen because he wanted kids. But that was until I saw how much she courted the media and pimped the kids out. Can we say “mommy dearest” anyone?
    JMO

    Reply
  320. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    I doubt anyone believes Marcia Lynne Bertrand Voight dyed Angelina’s hair as a child. That’s just another of Jolie’s fabrications to suit her purpose. Her entire career is filled with false stories about her childhood.@Real Talk:

    Reply
  321. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 6:55 pm

    Oh RT, if you would go to your local library and take out Brangelina: The Untold Story you’d be shocked at the REAL truths behind Jolie. It’s all facts, well documented. Angie was diagnosed by a professional in mental health a psychopath. She exhibits sociopathic tendencies. No empathy, no regret, no guilt….cold, hard heart. Jolie loves one person….herself. She does and deserves to give off evil vibes, her heart is a dark hole. When daddy Voight went before the press to beg for someone to help his daughter ( just after the BBT fiasco and her adoption of Maddox) he stated clearly that she has been known to have a serious mental illness from early childhood. That alone verifys the diagnoses sitting in her Beverly Hills High School files to this day. If you read Ian’s book, you will discover that the story leaked out against Jennifer Aniston not wanting children while married to Brad …… was Jolie’s Idea to divert blame of their divorce from her being the other woman once again. She’s more than evil! She knew that Jennifer had just miscarried her second fetus with Brad late in 2004 when she set the rumor out. Brad is a male whore to allow this to occur without speaking up for his wife/former wife regardless whether he knew Angie put that lie out then or not. He’s as guilty of this mess as Angie is…. the only difference is they each went into it with eyes open…but not focused on facts but on desires. Each one went into this toxic situation with one wish…personal gain. You actually can’t blame one (Brad and/or Angie) more than the other. Just two narcissistic, evil, mental cases who hooked up for self gratification.@Real Talk:

    Reply
  322. alif said on February 23rd, 2010 at 7:53 pm

    @mooki:
    It’s tame compared to what used to be discusssed on Defamer.com, re: Tom’s alleged sexual activities.

    Reply
  323. diplomat said on February 23rd, 2010 at 8:03 pm

    http://www.tmz.com/2010/02/23/brad-and-angie-the-face-sucking-continues/2#comments

    You can clearly see the skin at her neck! MOre proof that the other photos were not touched!

    Reply
  324. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 8:26 pm

    Yes alif, i’d read somewhere that Defamer.com used to be THE place to get the dish but that something happened to shut it down. Guess I missed a good opportunity to learn…..the rest of the story. :-( @alif:

    Reply
  325. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    Good Grief~! It would take more than a desire to stop the truth about a breakup with my partner to get me to kiss THAT~! Ewwwww, his jacket is all wrinkled at the bottom, that scruffy beard looks like his lunch box, and….nah…just ewwwwwwww. Guess it’s just as bad from the guy’s view as well what with the “worms” crawling around her jawline.@diplomat:

    Reply
  326. alif said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I understand.
    I once had a friend in S Francisco, who happened to be gay. (One couldn’t tell by looking.) And what a major fan of Brad he was! Well, I lost Robert’s friendship because I once said that Brad seemed a little bit of a dumb blond. I said this after my then friend was yet again raving about Brad’s appeal to him.

    I based my opinion on my experience with light-haired guys, and how they felt entitled to being adored, if you will.
    There they were/are plastered all over the entertainment media. With all that attention and adoration; they would be quite insulted when I, a mere minority, would not act like they were all that!
    So bye, bye, Robert, you fair-weather friend. (But not before he stole something from me!)

    I also remember a few years ago, an article by a hwd insider saying he was straight, but Brad Pitt was such a looker (i.e. girly man?) that he, the insider, would just stare at Brad in appreciation.

    And I posted this before: I saw a color photo of BP looking at GD as a girl would look at her beau.
    Also, it was reported that Angie didn’t care to have GC hanging around Brad. There was no mention of whether B cared about Jenny S. hanging around AJ.

    Haven’t been to those men-only meetings, (straight, bi, gay) where-in 30 or so guys would talk about everything under the sun. Much dishing about celebs transpired. Many were once in show biz, or know/knew others who were.

    The way BP was so casual about his marriage, makes me remember that his ex-wife said he “is missing a sensitivity chip!”

    And yes, I also have had the opinion that loonies would follow Brangie to the pits of hell. Just as Hitler commanded his followers’ total loyalty. Even as Manson was able to have women kill for him. So many others who wielded such power over fanatical followers!

    Reply
  327. octavia said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:36 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I agree,I read Ians book & another bio & she’s definately scary , the real Girl Interupted.
    Do you think she’s even slightly genuine in her motivations for good? or is it all just for money,power & attention.BTW I think she tried to talk away the psycopath diognosis by saying she told them what they wanted to here or copied it from movies or something….funny already deceptive & manipulating her image even at that age!

    Reply
  328. octavia said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    @Emerson:
    I just hope everbody will eventually she the nastiness of this woman,luckily its beging to show in her looks,shes getting the face she deserves!!

    Reply
  329. octavia said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:51 pm

    Sorry just read my comment ,you know what I mean LOL!!!!

    Reply
  330. alif said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    typo: the third from last para. should read: “I saw a color photo of BP looking at GC as a girl would look at her beau.”

    Reply
  331. Carrie said on February 23rd, 2010 at 9:55 pm

    More surgery is probably on the cards watch her disappear! she’ll probably come back with another set of gills.

    Reply
  332. Carrie said on February 23rd, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    @alif:
    Who’s GD?

    Reply
  333. Carrie said on February 23rd, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    Oops GC George Clooney I guess,the chemistry between the guys in the oceans movies is intense,can’t believe everyone didn’t notice it.

    Reply
  334. Pattyanne said on February 23rd, 2010 at 10:26 pm

    octavia, alif, I understood what your meaning was, no need to make corrections for my benefit. :-) And yes, I truly believe that the downfall of AJ is well on it’s way, as much for her dastardly deeds against others as for her self inflicted abuse at the hands of plastic surgeons over the years. Actually when you look at photos of the real Angelina Jolie Voight, she was attractive in a natural sort of way, but her appearance was likened to that of her father , John Voight. After the numerous mini surgeries she morphed into a refined version of her mother, although no plastic surgery could reduce the size of her manish hands and feet, or her overly large head..her diet/drugs keep her extremely think which disguises her natural build which I also believe it likened to that of her large boned father. She wants to be like mom, not dad and will do what ever it takes to achieve that goal…..in her mind. Sociopaths have no pity, guilt, remorse, or compassion for another living human being. It’s all about them. They believe it’s their right to do what it takes to make themselves happy, and they do. Horrible people when not living on a secluded island…lol. As for my take on Brad Pitt…he’s into S & M, prefers being sub, is bi leaning toward gay, and only “falls in love” with a woman whom he wishes to morph into (become she) to the best of his limited physical abilities. Translation: Brad Pitt is as screwed up in the head as Angie Jo is. Those poor children will in time grow to teens who will assume the responsibilities of raising their defective parents. Very sad.

    Reply
  335. alif said on February 23rd, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I printed parts of the thread. I’ll look it up, and post excerpts that may be of interest.

    Reply
  336. koko said on February 23rd, 2010 at 11:58 pm

    Poor Shiloh,her clothing choice of course!!!
    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/02/exclusive-photos-shilohs-shag-brad-angelinas-daughter-shows-boyish-new-do

    Reply
  337. Lucy said on February 24th, 2010 at 12:12 am

    I had short hair as a little kid & the pictures make me cringe,Thanks mom!!!!,but unlike Shiloh I was wearing dresses LOL ,I looked like a boy in a dress,my mom says I was cute…ha,but AJ never puts her in any remotely feminine clothes I always wonder what Brads family think about their grandaughter being made to look like a boy,but AJ also dyed Maddox & Pax’s hair & painted their nails.

    Reply
  338. Kate said on February 24th, 2010 at 12:32 am

    @octavia:

    I think at one time she was, and there is a part of her that is still touched by it, but the greater need takes over, unfortunately. jmo

    Reply
  339. Reality Check said on February 24th, 2010 at 4:15 am

    “Just Jared” has posted new pictures from “The Tourist”’s set. Here they are:

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/24/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-kissing-couple-of-tourists/

    The million-dollar question says: Why would Pitt and Jolie have to kiss each other in public if their relationship was really going strong? Why would they ever be concerned that someone out there thinks the opposite? I may well be wrong but I think that a relationship that feels it has to prove something to the world is not inherently strong. They could have shut the world away and focused on what they have but instead they feel they need to prove something to the world out there.

    It is an altogether separate question that if they started this relationship respectfully, waiting for the right time, without riding roughshod over other people and creating a huge public scandal with their extreme selfishness, nobody would ever want to see them split.

    “Damage control” wasn’t in their respective dictionaries at all.

    Reply
  340. Carrie said on February 24th, 2010 at 4:43 am

    Even they look embarrased….lame

    Reply
  341. lurkeyloo said on February 24th, 2010 at 9:20 am

    Oh my goodness!! So sorry to hear about your accident and glad you seem to be on the mend. @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  342. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 24th, 2010 at 2:02 pm

    @Kate:

    Hm, I’m not sure, I think it has always been an act. I have seen quite a few videos of Angelina on her “humanitarian” activities lately which demonstrate very clearly how she is faking concern for the cameras and is incredibly aware of the camera, the cameraman/director and how she is coming across. The Haiti one where she is knelt by the bed of the boy with the amputated leg is one of them. Watch that CNN video again, you will clearly see her glance quickly at the cameraman while she is talking to the child and the nurse to check that all is ok with the shot. There is video of her in a refugee camp in Africa when she is talking to the refugees and she suddenly realises she has forgotten to smile and quickly plasters a big fake smile over her face (as fake as the one she plastered all over her face when she came face to face with Jennifer Aniston at the Oscars recently). In her earlier days (and she looks significantly different in these clips, it really is noticeable), there is one interview with her in which she describes something that she had witnessed that really upset her in a war-torn country – an account of a young boy who was wounded but could not be saved due to lack of resources. The interview has a picture of her face in close up and as she recounts the story she is fighting back the urge to cry and saying she can’t talk about it because it is too upsetting for her. And the emphasis really was on that last phrase “upsetting for her” in my view. Rather than seeming like she was crying about the tragic fate of this little boy, the onus was on how incredibly upsetting it was for her to see it and to be powerless to do anything about it. She made a big show of getting very emotional and was clearly trying to draw sympathy from the audience for herself. It is what I call “grief porn”, i.e. when someone who has never known great tragedy themselves uses someone else’s tragedy to indulge themselves in a grief that is not theirs, and thereby get lots of attention for it. This is what Angelina is doing in this video and to a lesser extent, the CNN interview too. The expression on her face was one of desperate concern throughout the video as if the whole disaster had happened personally to her and she was at the centre of it all and personally affected by it. She’s not, and she’s not at the centre of any of these things, but she tries to make it about her through vicarious grief. And as anyone who has ever known true grief will attest, this is a morally disgusting thing to do. She makes me sick.

    Reply
  343. marty said on February 24th, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    To sela: Yes, Keane is right, no photoshopped here. If you look at today’s picture the one in Just Jared that reads: Brad & Angie kiss a ‘Tourist’ (in reference to the movie she’s shooting ) and visit from Brad and kids you ‘ll see her face flaws. No a pretty picture, literally…

    Reply
  344. Carrie said on February 24th, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Psychopaths feel no empathy,I think her father was right for raising his concerns about her UN ambasador role,the truth is Angelina probably can’t deal with her own life well enough to bring anything but her celebrity profile to these causes.Its becoming pretty obvious she’s a fake,her & Brad would get better publicity if they were honest ,the publicity tour is really annoying probably even her fans wish they would just cut the crap & be real….yawn.

    Reply
  345. Carrie said on February 24th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    Brad has really lost his looks ,that straggley grey beard is really aging,he also looks as though he’s so depressed that he’s given up caring about the looks which made him millions.I bet if you could see inside their formerly glamorous life you’d see Angelina messing with those kids heads or ignoring them while Brad spent most of the day stoned….just trying to escape the crazyeeeeeee!!..

    Reply
  346. Carrie said on February 24th, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    If anyone doubts that she’s a fake look at clips of her on youtube especially the ones on the red carpet with Brad where she acts all coy and dopey & plays the little woman,it really sucks that someone as strong willed as her would go through with this 1950s act… when everyone knows she’s the man in that relationship.

    Reply
  347. Carrie said on February 24th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    I bet Ian found out more than he could put in that book, which was heavily weighted AJs way,you know people out there know stuff about Brad ,I bet for one thing he’s had more than his share of casting couch experiences probably someone big is protecting him,before AJ he had a such squeaky clean image almost too good to be true.
    they’re always the ones to watch!Angie probably does suit him though ,its hard for a guy to find a girl who wants a : bend over boyfriend ! lol

    Reply
  348. alif said on February 24th, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    @Carrie:
    Well, I can only reveal that there was a powerful, gay entertainer, who came across as a wonderful guy.
    Yes, Merv Griffin was so likeable that his gayness remained an open secret in hwd.
    MG wielded such power that he easily attracted young wanna-be’s to his circle of friends.

    Also, it was reported by a trustworthy columnist/blogger, that BP lived with a gay roommate.
    And that MG helped BP.
    Furthermore, the roommate talked BP out of doing p–n. Seems that BP was so discouraged about his career going nowhere that he, despite his less than stellar equipment, was going to make that drastic move. (Then came “Thelma and Louise” to his rescue!)

    This info reveals the shallowness of BP. (If he can’t have things his way, he’ll do p–n). Also shows his lack of self-esteem!
    Easy pickings for a predatory female/male.
    JMO!

    Reply
  349. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 24th, 2010 at 5:05 pm

    @Carrie:

    Yep there is also video of her clearly hamming up the affection with Brad for the camera. The one when they’re in the restaurant in France and the paps are shooting through the window for one (think it was a dinner for the crew of IB). Ange looks right at them, gives them the full “I’m loving this” glare and then starts to maul Brad. Brad, clearly annoyed, grabs her hand and throws it off his face. She does it all the time. She also dresses strategically to stir up or deflate rumours about whether she is pregnant or not. Her whole life is mapped out as one big media charade. I just can’t imagine being so shallow that you would waste 20 seconds (or 20 seconds as Angelina does) of your life on such utter nonsense. Most celebs pay people to promote them, Angelina dreams all this up herself. Her whole career is one big act, a facade with nothing of substance whatsoever to back it up with. No great acting performances that will go down in cinematic history (the supporting actress oscar job just won’t stand the test of time with film lovers, the overall film was flaccid), no education, no real achievements in any other field, just photo opps. And her family is just one big lie. I can’t think of a sadder life to lead than that of Angelina Jolie in fact. I think only a sociopath could live this life without slitting their wrists at the emptiness of it all. JMO

    Reply
  350. alif said on February 24th, 2010 at 7:51 pm

    Check this out! Attn to pg. 33.
    Note discoloration to left heel. Veins ready to pop out legs.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/galleries/celebs_worst_photos/celebs_worst_photos.html

    Reply
  351. Pattyanne said on February 24th, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/03/11/gal_jolie_cellulite.jpg
    Holy Cow! And some of the loons bashed Jen for a trunk scene in The Bounty Hunter, guess they missed this photo of cellulite-leg Jolie!@alif:

    Reply
  352. Kate said on February 25th, 2010 at 12:48 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    well that is true Keane, but to be honest when no one has ever experienced anything like that , that is often the the first reaction. I remember well when she first began her plight and I really do believe she had somewhat of a heart for it then. She was excited about learning, now it is just business as usual. somehow I think she believed it would heal her in the way some women think having a baby will give them the love they need , not understanding, it works the other way around..they baby depends on you for your love..as a newborn..I have seen this so many times.

    It sure does seem like they are in defense mode though..which is crazy because honestly no one really cares that much, and they just need to live ..can you imagine trying to put on a show 24/7?

    I would think that would only make them more unhappy and trapped.

    Reply
  353. alif said on February 25th, 2010 at 3:15 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Also noted the thinning hair. After the wormy neck.

    This is what one dreads, in a way. But it’s good to note that at long last, the loons will get a wake up call.
    Well, that is, if they are somehow able to admit reality!

    I don’t think anyone would rejoice in her deterioration. I, for one, wish her to heal. But, as I learned, it’s next to impossible to heal a psychopath! Not impossible, mind you!

    Reply
  354. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 25th, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    @Kate:

    Hm yes but the people who were really suffering in the events she was recounting were the boy and his family, not her. If you have known great suffering yourself through things that have happened to your loved ones, you understand that whatever sorrow you may be feeling in any situation as a witness and bystander is miniscule in comparison to the pain and grief that is being inflicted on the family – and will be for the rest of their lives. You most certainly do not go on a TV show and talk about how upsetting those events were for you personally and indulge yourself in a bit of a crying session in front of millions of people. It is utterly disrespectful to the actual and very real grief and suffering of the individuals involved. It is exactly like her “charity” work to me, she goes to these regions, sees people in dire need who are suffering acutely and then comes back to talk about it expecting a pat on the back for being so good as to visit them and have her delicate sensitivities affected. She is not doing it for them, she is doing it for herself. These people will never be able to fly away from their troubles, they will endure it for life. A HW actress using their horrendous experience as fodder for an emotive interview is utterly crass and demonstrates her total lack of genuine empathy for the people concerned. At the end of the day, in this interview, she was not talking about the boy, she was talking about the feelings she had while witinessing his suffering. What mattered was the boy, not her, but no-one seems to have explained that to her.

    In the job I am doing at the moment I read about and witness first hand some terrible stories about children – many of whom are very sick and are in and out of intensive care all their lives and have been since birth – and I feel sad about it every day. I see parents being given a diagnosis of autism for their child and how devastated they are by it (many say it is the worst day of their lives). And I feel deeply upset and saddened for them and for all the children that have such terrible sicknesses that they are more familiar with the inside of a hospital than they are with their bedroom at home. But I know how great the difference is between what I’m feeling and what they’re going through because I’ve been through such dreadful things with my own loved ones. And I show respect for what they’re feeling by not indulging myself in a bit of vicarious suffering when the reality is I can go home and never have to think about it ever again. These are people’s real lives that Angelina is using for her press, and their great suffering. She is a witness to these events but she is not personally affected by them. It is very similar to watching a really upsetting film for her; upsetting yes, but ultimately life will go on as usual. Not so for these people, their lives will never be the same. If Angelina knew how this felt she would never exploit these people the way she does. But she has no emotions and no conscience and that is how she is able to do it. Exactly the same with the boy with the amputated leg in Haiti which she knelt by the side of – and tried to look gorgeous and caring with – for the benefit of the camera. That poor boy – who will live with that amputation and the family he has lost for the rest of his life – was being used as nothing more than a prop in the publicity campaign of a shallow and hollow HW actress. I don’t think anyone could dispute how morally abhorrent that is. That is why I hate this woman. Period.

    Reply
  355. Kate said on February 25th, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I understand what you mean Keane, CNN does a segment on REAL HEROES every year, she is not ,among them. They are every day people who have given up their time, they financial stability to make a difference of those less fortunate. You and I both know Angelina has a mental diagnosis that will not allow that. That is fact as we know it. She is not normal in terms of thinking the way we do. Putting others first and self sacrificing, otherwise as Dr who said if she were a reformed Heroin addict she would be quietly and hands on giving of her time in these humanitarian efforts, and it would be about them, and not her. This is where I draw the line for her.

    I can not hate someone that has been dealt a illness, whether it cancer, Aids, Alzhiemers, Bipolar, etc. Yes she is rich, famous, manipulative, all those things, but she is also in need of help. I don’t like 98 percent of what she does, she is smug and needs to be humbled, and it is sad that no one will help that happen, because it is only from that she can be healed.That is what I believe. I believe JV loves his daughter, and it has to hurt greatly to hear what he does, to see her behave as he does, but what can you do when a sociopath/psychopath refuses to get help. Well hopefully you stage an intervention, but we all know those are only as successful as the person is willing to stay in counseling and on meds. I think she loves her kids to the degree she can, and if anything ever happened to them it would be the end of her life.

    I know you will not agree with me on this, but I am looking at this from the point of view, when a person is ill, they are not evil, they are ill. Brad is enabling her. Sadly. However he has enough money to contain it, the real problems will begin when the kids refuse to be contained.

    You have to remember, we hate what she has done, but to say we hate her, those are strong words, and I can not honestly and in good faith say that. If she were my daughter, this would be breaking my heart.

    just a different perspective, and no I have not crossed over. :)

    ttl

    Reply
  356. Carrie said on February 25th, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    does anyone think her PR bitches really post here ?
    that could explain some things/people here!!

    Reply
  357. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 25th, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    @Kate:

    Hm yes, I guess I am not quite so sure of that diagnosis of mental illness as you are. I don’t think we can 100% rely on this idea that she is mentally ill and therefore is not accountable. I have never seen any concrete evidence of diagnosis by a psychiatrist to this effect or that she is being treated for it. Someone like Britney Spears who has had the ability to control her own life removed from her by a court of law I am happy to believe is not in control of her mental faculties. I don’t see this evidence yet in the case of Angelina, so I think we are coming from different perspectives there.

    Second of all, I think there is a difference in terms of how we perceive her as an individual. Whereas you perceive her as a daughter, I first and foremost perceive her as a parent, and that really obliterates her status as anything else to me. I have very strong views on parenthood and they are not ones that everyone will necessarily agree with. My view is that once you are a parent, once you have taken the decision to bring a child into the world, that child and your relationship with it comes over and above everything else in your life, including your relationship with your partner. And I think your partner should be exactly the same. This may sound harsh to some but this is how I was raised and this is how I believe every parent should be. Child first, you second, in all circumstances. For me, this is what it is to love someone and this is how all children should be treated. And if you’re not prepared to make that sacrfice, don’t bring a child into the world, simple as that. Children are incredibly sensitive emotional beings and as I’ve said before, the smallest thing can f*ck them up in a way that is irremediable and will continue to affect them for the rest of their lives. As my psychologist friend has explained to me, the first 12 years of a child’s life is absolutely crucial in forming their sense of emotional security and well-being and these establishing years affect them for the rest of their lives. I have many friends who, as adults, suffer from depression and are medicated for it, because of the failure of their parents to make them feel adequately loved and cared for in their childhood. And this is despite the fact that they have a great relationship with their parents as adults and realise now that they were loved in their childhood. Simply put, you can never unpick the mistakes that you made with caring for your children in their early years, it marks them out for a future of happiness or misery for the rest of their life. And Angelina is a parent now, and I’m afraid to say that that means to me that her feelings are no longer a priority. I may not feel so harshly towards her if she wasn’t inflicting suffering on other individuals as I know she is (although I would still feel absolutely disgusted about her exploitation of refugees), but the fact remains that she is. Just look at the sadness in those children’s eyes in all their photos – that is the sadness that I see in the children that come for therapy at the centre I am working in at the moment. I can instantly recognise it and I instantly feel terribly, terribly sorry for those children. And I’m sorry but that sadness is being caused by the selfish, narcissistic behaviour of her mother and it is completely unacceptable. And for that I would say that, in a completely dispassionate way, I do hate Angelina. She is the architect of those children’s misery, and mental condition or not, she is responsible for it and must be held accountable. I just don’t buy into all this “poor Angelina” BS. I tend to think “poor Angelina”? What about her poor children! They did not ask to be brought into this situation and they have no control over it whatsoever and my sympathies are first and foremost with them. As for their mother, well, it’s just too late, she had plenty of time to deal with her own issues before they came along and she did not do it, so tough luck is what I say I’m afraid. I guess also I am not a religious person and I do not believe all people deserve forgiveness and an opportunity for redemption, because that would mean that anyone could get away with absolutely anything and think forgiveness is their right and I don’t believe it is. So no, no sympathy for Angelina from me, I can’t say I really care about her at all. And I don’t think she deserves to be cared about, not when there are six young vulnerable lives to be cared for first. JMO

    Reply
  358. Kate said on February 25th, 2010 at 5:01 pm

    Carrie, what people are you referring to exactly?

    Reply
  359. Real Talk said on February 25th, 2010 at 9:23 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I read some of the book. I started following this website before the book came out and was looking forward to purchasing it. I went to a bookstore and read the beginning of the book. I was discussed by all of the lies she told and got a headache just reading about her crazy ass. I may check it out from the library but it is difficult to read since she speaks out of both sides of her mouth. One minute she says I hate my father she wasn’t there for me as a child, next minute you are a wonderful dad. It’s what ever suits her and there are people out there who don’t see the light cause she adopted children of different races from third world countries. Now she is the most beautiful women in the world, please!!! Of course I see from this site and others, that many people have turned on them and it makes me happy. I enjoy reading your comments as well as Kate, Keane, and Emerson to name a few. I am glad I found this site and look forward to reading the comments daily even if I don’t write often. Thanks for the reply. JMHO

    Reply
  360. Carrie said on February 25th, 2010 at 9:27 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    It’s good to know that kids have someone like you on their side Keane.

    Reply
  361. Carrie said on February 25th, 2010 at 9:37 pm

    @Kate:
    The people I’m referring to are the ones who come here to question peoples dislike of Jolie & defend her when this is obviously a place where she’s not popular,I don’t know if PR people use sites like this to try to rescue their clients image or not…..anyway I guess she needs some supporters.

    Reply
  362. Kate said on February 26th, 2010 at 12:26 am

    @Carrie:
    hmm, well the only one I see is lory that defends Jolie, so I am not quite sure who else you mean, I am pretty familiar with almost all the other posters here, and many of them are on another board with Keane,and Tam, Vic, TC,and I and a few others . I don’t think there is anyone here really defending her other than lory, the rest is just discussion for the sake of, but last year around this time, yeah, we had our share, Keane and I were beaten to shreds on a daily basis, I would venture today their playground is FF..jmo

    Reply
  363. Carrie said on February 26th, 2010 at 1:34 am

    Well I didn’t want to get specific! but I see more than just one poster. Why last year just random ?Whats FF ?

    Reply
  364. Kate said on February 26th, 2010 at 1:40 am

    @Carrie:
    FF is the British Female First board that some here post on. Last year it was insane on here, we were getting hit on a daily basis , constant attack, Keane got it worse than I did, but it just did not let up until after IAN’s book came out. At one point IAN informed us that Angelina was reading and posting here, and then of course things got crazy, we were accused of being (Keane and I) of being IAN, Sugar Ray, and paid posters, it got to be ridiculous. I am glad things have finally calmed back down.They would come here for no other reason but to attack Keane and I, and that reason only. That was when IAN began his Angelina expose. You can go back to the archives and read some of IAN’s stories.

    Reply
  365. Kate said on February 26th, 2010 at 1:42 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I have to say my Brad needs to be slapped for his part in this, don’t you think?

    Reply
  366. Belinda said on February 26th, 2010 at 1:59 am

    Could someone tell me anout Thom Racine? I googled him on his site he says he knew Brad but not a lot else.Does anyone know anymore?

    Reply
  367. Carrie said on February 26th, 2010 at 2:06 am

    @Kate:
    I think they accused you of being Ian because you seem well informed,they probably think know one else gets it! Thanks for answering Kate:)

    Reply
  368. jan/sa said on February 26th, 2010 at 3:47 am

    the problem is these two morons think that they are giving the kids a world wide education and that they are being home schooled. but i as a mother of two know that a kid needs a stable home and they need to make friends at school and have outside family outings with non family member to learn social behaviour and independence in the real world. kids can be very cruel to each other and your children need to learn how to cope with the good and the bad in the real world. by isolating these kids and not giving them the chance to socialy interact with other children they are doing more harm than aything else.
    i see a family with kids at my shop that are being home schooled and they are not interacting with other kids there own age and it is sad as the young girl is already acting like a old married woman and the boy are like old married men and they are always together no other friends around. i am not a expert on this but just by observing these kids i feel sorry for them and i am not saying all home education is wrong but i truly believe kids should be allowed to have friends of their choice and have a stable home base a dominating mother can do alot of damage to her children and with a pussy whippped dad it is just sad.
    if these kid had a strong father and he stayed at home in la and put them in school she could always fly home on week-ends she could put it in her contract that she finishes work on the set early fridays and only starts on monday again, because according to her fans she is so powerful she could demand anything and get her way.jmo

    Reply
  369. alif said on February 26th, 2010 at 4:31 am

    @Pattyanne:
    A vein-stripping procedure might be in her future. It could be a career-saving move.
    She is definitely the dominant one.
    AJ also looks much older than her chronological age. Stress and other negative factors at play here.
    No guilty conscience as far as she’s concerned. It’s her victims who are at fault, iho!

    As I reported in my research on religion, I found out that the demons would complain to certain righteous people that their practice of religion was painful to them.
    Of course all they know is lies, as is mentioned in the bible.

    It’s very intriguing to think about her hostage, and where his self-centeredness got him! As the saying goes, I wouldn’t wish that on my own worst enemy!
    Is she blackmailing him? With photos/tapes/e-mails? What? Very intriguing, I say!

    Brad in diapers! Was he stoned and unaware about when and if that photo was taken?
    That would fetch a tidy sum from the tabs. That alone would make him toe the line. JMO!

    Wither, Andrew Morton?

    OT. Walter Koenig revealed that his son committed suicide. My prayers go to his loved ones!

    Reply
  370. Reality Check said on February 26th, 2010 at 8:10 am

    @Kate:

    Just the idea of Angelina reading the posts here and posting her own replies is so hilarious that it made my day. Thank you for the good laugh. If she really did that, I wish I had seen her face and reactions.

    :)

    Reply
  371. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 26th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    @Reality Check:

    It was quite amusing for a while. The funniest part was when she was getting someone to post in French for her because that would somehow prove it wasn’t her. She kept saying things like “I am just a nobody and a citizen of the world who uses the internet as my favourite playground” or words to that effect. She’s so thick the poor love she didn’t realise how unconvincing her personas always sounded. Who would have expected that from such a great actress as Ms Angelina Jolie? Ha ha. Then her PR people took over from her and were slightly more effective, but eventually I think they were banned. I think their posts get deleted on here now or perhaps they think it is too risky to post here after the international attention Ian’s book has received. They know that we know that they are her PR people and they do not want the wider world (especially any journos reading this site) to think that Angelina gives two hoots about Ian or even acknowledges his existence. He is supposed to just be a “tabloid hack” spinning lies about her to make a quick buck after all, it wouldn’t do to act like she cared about it would it now? FF is more low profile though so they are out in force over there, and very obvious it is too. And very funny!

    Reply
  372. alif said on February 26th, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    The Cult of Brangelina! As deadly as The Cult of Scientology; The Cult of Jim Jones (except Brangie’s followers harm themselves and others mainly in a spiritual way); The Cult of Charlie Manson and The fans of Hitler, (Still strong today). It goes on and on!

    This deadly cult is why many of us are here! If we can help the unsuspecting sheep out there; to open their eyes, it will be worth all the time and energy we spend exposing the cult!

    Reply
  373. Reality Check said on February 26th, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    That’s hilarious, Keane! :)

    Reply
  374. Blind Gossip Solved said on February 26th, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    He Wants to Run Away From Her Insecurities

    BuzzFoto – This popular celeb couple has an image problem. It being that the female REALLY cares about how she and her partner are perceived and the male couldn’t care less. The female is so obsessed about the PR side of their relationship, about looking to be secure and in love, that it is driving the male to resent her. He is starting to want out, because the harder she pulls the further he pushes away. We hear although she is super famous and beautiful, she is incredibly insecure. Her whole focus of the relationship has long ago moved away from passion and more about appearance. Over the holidays, the male tried to do some normal activities that a family would do and the female was determined to turn it into a PR event. The two ended up in a very heated argument, and the male left and spent the night with another woman. This happens more and more frequently. The female claims she doesn’t care, as long as the male shows up when she needs him to. We fear the relationship is doomed, which will break a lot of hearts- and not just those of their fans. Not Tom and Katie.

    Photo Credit: BuzzFoto

    SOLVED!

    It’s Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie! Source: BuzzFoto

    Congrats to everyone who guessed correctly!

    Who is “the other woman”?

    http://blindgossip.com/?p=14947#more-14947

    Reply
  375. stinky-inky said on February 26th, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    Brangelina is/are a lot more interesting when they are breaking up.

    Reply
  376. Belinda said on February 26th, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    @Belinda:
    Could someone tell me about Thom Racine..Please

    Reply
  377. Kate said on February 27th, 2010 at 1:27 am

    @Belinda:

    Belinda, I wrote the whole thing out for you and then like a tired dummy hit the wrong key on my laptop and gone..so too tired after a long day that was not uplifting, but..read these pages

    http://www.thomracina.com/bradpitt.html

    This is the book Thom wrote for Brad, hoping he would play the part, Brad never acknowledged him ever-
    http://www.thomracina.com/snowangel.html

    look at the role he was to play, psychopath, and he is with one.

    http://www.welovesoaps.net/2010/01/talkin-with-thom-racina-wls-interview_05.html#more

    This interview talks about Brad wanting him to write the book for him to be a psychopath. How he helped him get his start at 23 years old..Jen is mentioned also.

    There are a couple more interviews, but I can’t find them where Thom talked on the radio about loaning his home in Los Feliz to Brad when a girlfriend from college came to see him, and they spent the weekend there. Then he found out she was cheating on him and was broken hearted, and come home and cried on his shoulder, literally.

    When Brad moved out he left behind some personal things, some of which were letters to girlfriends, which Thom shared ..he was involved with two at the same time trying to decide which one he loved.

    When he got the part for Dallas, (think) he came home and jumped literally ahem into Thom’s arms.

    Thom maintains they were buddies, but it sounds like he was hurt that Brad would never acknowledge him once he moved out-ever. Never has since. Making Snow Angel would have changed TR’s life. He ran from cameras. Did not want anyone to know he lived in the maid’s room of a gay man’s home, fresh from the plains of Missouri.
    That is understandable, at the time, he was green, and did not even tell his parents what he was really doing. However, still today he does not credit Thom for his start. No one ever touches this story, IAN’ publishers would not let him and there is it right there on the internet for public consumption.

    Thom makes revealing comments like: He came to my room to ask for a book, which I thought was odd, since they were all over the house, he jumped for joy into my arms, he cried and put his head on my shoulder, he ran from cameras, he was like family, but never acknowledged me again. That book by the way was “Interview of a Vampire” he read it, can’t remember, but I think he said he did not like it. lol

    So while Thom Racina does not say Brad was his lover, it sure does sound like he is letting people think that he may have been, and Brad certainly could see that. He stopped writing for awhile because he could not get anything published at all, and I have always wondered if there was a reason for that. Not that I believe he is gay, but it certainly would open things up for questions at 23 years old..and even the “Queers of the Roundtable” have always felt Brad was straight , right IAN? :)

    We now know he is at least bisexual.

    He is writing again now, hope he got a advance with that promise to shut up. lol

    This is just my humble supposition of course. Hope it helps.

    Reply
  378. Belinda said on March 2nd, 2010 at 12:01 am

    Thats the way things work in Hollywood,so much is known or at least suspected but no one ever tells.There is something slightly off about BPs choice of women..lets face it he has been prettier than than most of them
    in the past.A straight guy just out of Missouri rooming with a gay guy is questionable,many people would be suspicious of the dynamics of their gay/straight living arrangement,the guy mentions Brads girlfriends in a way which could seem to be trying to protect Brad,I’m sure he has been hurt by Brad not acknowleging him,but he knows Brads stardom depends on all the less glamourous parts of his life being
    carefully hiden away.The thing about Ians book & other biographies is not only about the legal implications of telling the truth its about the fine balance between telling the real story & antagonizing the fans who
    are usually the ones buying the books.
    Thanks again for the reply…its nice to see that others see beyond the carefully crafted lies.

    Reply
  379. JamesHT said on March 2nd, 2010 at 3:36 am

    Hi, all ,

    i maintain only just joined here,.

    and i am happy that i create account this forum..

    looking support to learn something unheard of here.[url=http://www.xgirlnude.com].[/url]….[url=http://www.camspotadult.com].[/url].

    Thanks.[url=http://www.whoreinside.com].[/url]…[url=http://www.exgirlnude.com].[/url]…:)

    sorry for my bad english, i m from russia.

    Reply
  380. Reality Check said on March 2nd, 2010 at 8:17 am

    Very interesting links, Kate – thanks a lot. I didn’t even know about Thom Racina, so this story puts Brad in a different perspective. The truth is I don’t care if Brad is gay or bi or hetero – he would be talented in all three cases. The problem is that his forgetfulness of Racina’s favour amounts to ingratitude. I don’t know what his reasons are, but his unwillingness to credit the man’s attempt to help his career is beyond me.

    Reply
  381. alif said on March 2nd, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    @Kate:
    This supports my long-held notion about men falling in love with BP.
    In a post, I told about a former friend who was so fanatical about BP’s appeal to him that he dropped me when I opined that Brad was (and still is, btw!) a bit of a dumb blond.
    Sounds like Thom still is in love with his former roommate.

    Reply
  382. alif said on March 2nd, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    @JamesHT:
    Just a suggestion: Send an e-mail to Ian. Ask him whether this is the place for such input.

    Reply
  383. Real Talk said on March 2nd, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    @Kate:
    Can you give me a link that stating the problem Zahara has with the twins. I read on this site that she tried to
    hurt one of them but I did a search a never found this story.

    Reply
  384. Bobbie said on March 10th, 2010 at 8:37 pm

    This is the main reason I like ianundercover.com. Great post.

    Reply
  385. Sammy said on March 11th, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Perfect. ianundercover.com i my favorits site.

    http://whiplasheslatimer.blogspot.com/2010/03/robert-kingbolt.html

    Reply
  386. sinnyHarViona said on March 11th, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    Visit LowCostLinks.com For 100 FREE Links Pointing To Your Website Of Choice!

    Should You Need 1,000 Or More Links To Your Site – We Sell Packages Of 1,000 Links For As Little As $6 USD.

    Let The Linking Begin!

    Reply
  387. sinnyHarViona said on March 12th, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    Where can you purchase links to your website?

    Visit http://LowCostLinks.com – we sell 1,000 links for as little as $6 USD.

    Reply
  388. Javier said on March 13th, 2010 at 11:56 am

    How do you do it, ianundercover.com?

    http://akhasmakinsufferably.blogspot.com/2010/03/drumstick-whet-downswing-akhasmak-video.html

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Meta