IUC Exclusive: Brad In Miami; Angie en route

Posted on February 7th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

brangieThe world’s paps will be waiting for Angie in a couple of hours when she touches down in Miami. Angie is on a flight right now…she’ll arrive after the big game has started. Meanwhile, Brad arrived yesterday with Maddox and will attend the big game. Will she head to the stadium for another photo opportunity for the glorious pair???? Sources told IUC they will not leave Miami together. Angie will be en route to Haiti. A source told IUC the couple is not getting back together. “They’re trying to do as much damage control as possible,” the source said. Never a dull moment.

  1. JinxieGal said on February 7th, 2010 at 4:50 pm

    I don’t get it. Is she stalking him or is this all pre-planned?

    The posing for “together” photo ops will be key

    Reply
  2. cuze said on February 7th, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    Aren’t you there too, Ian?

    Reply
  3. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 7th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    Bitch gets around huh? Let’s all wait for the Haiti publicity extrvaganza, we have already had the quote leaked from the CEO of Angelina’s charity of choice:

    “SOS villages are there before, during and after the cameras have stopped rolling. So is Angelina Jolie”.

    Good old Angelina, never one to let a mass tragedy on a scale never before seen go to waste when it could be used for some good publicity hey? Didn’t she rush to Pakistan when the story of her affair with Brad broke? Wonder if the world will be fooled twice? We shall see….

    Reply
  4. Big Applette said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    What’s interesting is that Clinton just arrived in Haiti as well……

    Maybe she is picking up Maddox from Brad so he can go along for the photo opp.

    Reply
  5. Tamara said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    @Big Applette:
    Ohhhhhh yea, maybe that’s it! We know she doesn’t care about the Superbowl! haha Yes, Mad must be going with her, he is her companion of choice for her PR *cough* I mean goodwill trips. LOL

    Reply
  6. mooki said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    please don’t tell me she’s trying to adopt a kid from Haiti. this woman disgusts me

    Reply
  7. inOttawa said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    What about just taking the time to be a mom?

    Reply
  8. Big Applette said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    @Tamara:
    Yup, nothing like a third-world accessory to complete the caring humanitarian outfit.

    Reply
  9. too curious said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    @inOttawa:

    LOL – good one! Very funny!

    Reply
  10. jannice said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    It is unbelievable!…I don’t remember where I read that They can’t be at the same car together & now I can see that They can’t be in the same plane together!!!.

    The unbelievable thing here for me is: Is he so JERK that He resists all of this PR’s stuff?..In an australian mag I read that he wants to go out but SHE has the control & She will leave him When She wants…My goodness, what kind of man is this GUY?…I REALLY AM SHAME ON HIM!!!!

    Reply
  11. Pattyanne said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:51 pm

    Well, Angie’s history is that of stalking the men who manage to escape her spiderlike hold on them perhaps she is stalking Brad. Yano, stick a few pins in him to remind him of who actually has the control over the situation, snatch up Maddox (her one true love) and fly off the Haiti for her latest Grand Humanitarian Performance….Ha! We have her number, she’s a biz ZERO. As for Brad The Ballless Wonder Boy, well, at this point I don’t give Pittiful a thought. He made his bed with the ho five + years ago, and I feel he diserves all he gets from that toxic pairing. In about eight more years we will be seeing a repeat of Woody Allen….mark my words. Maddox Chivaun will be Soon Ye Jolie….so sad.

    Reply
  12. I'm on the bidet said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    @mooki:
    Hey mooki,

    You seem to be up on Tom and Katie and Scientology news. Are the assertions about the legality of their marriage correct in this article:
    http://marriage.about.com/od/entertainmen1/p/tomcruise.htm

    There is also this blind item: http://blindgossip.com/?p=15443

    Specifically, their marriage in Italy wasn’t legal because it was a Scientology ritual? And the article makes the comment that the two “reportedly were previously legally married” at their Beverly Hills mansion a few weeks before the event in Italy. Has the press or anyone else found legal documentation that they were in fact legally married in California? I would expect a marriage certificate to have a date on it.

    It would be so odd if they turned out not to be married . . .

    Reply
  13. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 7th, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    @jannice:

    Cover of Now magazine in the UK this week has a headline saying Brad is being bullied into doing what Angelina says by her threats to reveal secrets that could and probably would destroy his career. I think this is the beginnng and the end of why he is going along with it.

    Reply
  14. jannice said on February 7th, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    What can it be so bad that he is so scared?.

    Reply
  15. Tamara said on February 7th, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    Mozzarella sticks, stuffed jalapenos, man sized pizzas, a case of beer, one mason jar full of moonshine (LOL) and a bottle of Captain Morgans = spells Super Bowl Party at my house in 15 minutes! LOL Have a good night you all, I’ll let you know if I see Brad hahaha

    Reply
  16. Tamara said on February 7th, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    PS – I didn’t plan the menu! haha

    Reply
  17. Vittoria said on February 7th, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    @Tamara:
    I hope you have a terrific time!!!!!! Party time @ Tamara’s!!!!!

    Reply
  18. Vittoria said on February 7th, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    I read that Jen is having a press thing for the Bounty Hunter movie Tuesday (I think it was). This is AJ’s SOP. Here we go again. That woman is pathetic. if she put as much effort into being a decent human being as she does into effing with Jen (and Brad, etc, etc) she might have a chance at getting better. Twisted little thing.

    Reply
  19. mooki said on February 7th, 2010 at 7:42 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    their marriage isn’t legal, period. Scientology isn’t a recognized religion in the US even though the IRS gave them tax exempt status here in the early 90s. Travolta and Kelly Preston also got “married” in Europe and got “remarried” in FL. see where i’m going w/ this (*cough* beard *cough*)

    Reply
  20. omg said on February 7th, 2010 at 8:33 pm

    Hey Ian is it a big game? A really big game? How many times can you use that phrase in one post? How is your “supermodel wants to party and attend the big game” going for you. You are such an undercover stud!

    Reply
  21. Vittoria said on February 7th, 2010 at 11:04 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Since she showed up in Miami, she must surely have some nasty stuff on him.

    Reply
  22. Vittoria said on February 7th, 2010 at 11:06 pm

    @omg:
    You apparently are very unaware of American culture. Yeah, football, especially the super bowl is huge – a really big show!!!!!!!

    Reply
  23. I'm on the bidet said on February 7th, 2010 at 11:20 pm

    @mooki:
    So nobody can turn up a copy of an official government document indicating Tom and Katie are legally/officially married? That is bizarre (or maybe nobody has looked, which would be equally bizarre). And common law marriage isn’t recognized in California, correct?
    (see http://www.cadivorceonline.com/calpages/Alimony/commonlawmarriage.asp)

    So this starts to make sense as a financial and career strategy – it has all the publicity elements of a marriage, but none of the financial culpability . . . not a bad position for an A-lister (if true).

    Reply
  24. Meh said on February 7th, 2010 at 11:33 pm

    Pics are up at Getty Images. Was Jolie even at the game?

    Reply
  25. alif said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:10 am

    The Super Bowl is to America, what the World Cup is to the rest of the world.
    Celebs/Stars will do what they can to reflect in all the glory! A good career move; esp. if the paps do their thing!

    Angie may have evidence of Brad in some compromising position. It may well be something such as Brad in diapers, or with a male.
    It has to be serious enough to threaten Braddie’s career.
    JMO!

    Reply
  26. MickeyB said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:20 am

    @Meh:
    Jolie was in the box with Brad and Maddox. Pictures of them at FF show Brad fondling her and all of them cheering when the Saints won. Much more effective PR stunt than the DGA’s.

    Reply
  27. dani said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:46 am

    Well, if they are breaking up, the pictures that are candids from Belga Press Agency certainly don’t show it. They are hugging and kissing and both look very loving. The pics are obviously candids and taken from a telephoto lens. You can see them JustJared–look for the posts by QQQQ.
    The Getty pics of Tom Cruise –well he looks much more hassled and unhappy than Brad does!

    Reply
  28. B said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:06 am

    There are NO pictures of them kissing at the game. They share an awkward hug, in which they don’t even face one another, and Pitt’s hips are several feet away from her body. They are seen talking a couple of brief times in several hundred photos, and he helps her up the stairs as though it’s incredibly hard for her. Her weight must be down to less than a hundred pounds in these shots. Throughout the rest of the shots, they don’t pay each other much attention. Pitt even gives a high-five to a female staff member in their suite, yet he barely touches jolie except for the weird hug.

    Reply
  29. B said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:11 am

    P.S.–why did she follow him there? She wasn’t shooting anything, and supposedly, they’re living under the same roof. Why not go together? And to dani–they obviously knew they’d be photographed. Brad had been photographed the previous day, and the public was well aware that he’d be attending the game. The shots were awkward and Pitt acted more like he was babysitting his grandmother than hanging out with his girlfriend.

    Reply
  30. dining alone said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:17 am

    those Belga pix are not indicative of anything. She’s well aware that they’re being snapped. Her smiles are mostly forced. He gives her a weird boob grab hug and the only person she kisses is Mad Max. Why was he helping her up the stairs? No big deal, just probably being a p-whipped gentleman. Those pics aren’t all that special.

    Jus’ sayin’

    Reply
  31. Reality Check said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:32 am

    “They’re trying to do as much damage control as possible,” the source said.

    I wish they thought about some damage control when they got together. Do you remember how heartless and insensitive they were? It seems that the idea of “damage control” occurs to them only when their own interests are concerned.

    Reply
  32. jannice said on February 8th, 2010 at 5:21 am

    IAN, you were right. Here the proof.

    http://x17online.com/celebrities/brad_pitt/first_pix_brad_and_angelina_reunite_at_the_superbowl-02072010.php

    What a circus!!!…He looks Upset, isn’t he?

    Reply
  33. jannice said on February 8th, 2010 at 5:21 am

    IAN, you were right. Here the proof.

    http://x17online.com/celebrities/brad_pitt/first_pix_brad_and_angelina_reunite_at_the_superbowl-02072010.php

    What a circus!!!…He looks Upset, doesn’t he?

    Reply
  34. jannice said on February 8th, 2010 at 5:23 am

    @jannice:

    Always dark glasses!!!!…Noboby wants to see each other!!!!.

    Reply
  35. jan/sa said on February 8th, 2010 at 5:58 am

    in pics he is brabbing here boobs what a total jerk, if any man did that to me infront of friends i would slap him shitless it is a sign of no respect for a woman and he does it in front of the whole world is that supposed to stop the breakup rumors? WHO GIVES A SHIT IS THEY TOGETHER OR NOT THEY WILL STILL BE THE BRUNT OF JOKES AND DISGUST FOR YEARS TOGETHER OR APART. PEOPLE DO NOT FORGET PAST BEHAVIOUR . imo they will never have the respect of the world and sane people no matter what. i hope they stay together as they deserve one another. is this display for jens benefit as she is having a holiday with friends and people that act respectful of each other she really had a lucky escape. jmo

    Reply
  36. Brad and Angelina KISSING and HUGGING said on February 8th, 2010 at 6:16 am

    Here are pictures of them kissing and hugging

    Brad and Angelina KISSING and HUGGING

    http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/585114/t/Brad … l?page=969

    On the bottom of the page there is a picture of brad and angelina kissing !!!!!Top
    ——————————————————————————–

    http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/585114/t/Brad … l?page=965

    here are pictures of them hugging

    Reply
  37. Odais said on February 8th, 2010 at 6:35 am

    @jan/sa:
    I am agree!!!….Poor GUY….Great example for his kids in the future!!!…Maddox learns How to play a JERk & Keep the appearances…Your daddy is the best example!!!!

    Reply
  38. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:25 am

    @dining alone:

    You mean just like Jen was when she started her lovefest with Buttler at the Golden Globes? They reignited a rumor that had already died down only to stop it when Butler publicly kissed a violine player.
    And now she drags him to Mexico and plays the happy couple again! You know what? How lame is it to restart a romance rumor for pr purpose only to end it 2 days later by humiliating your partner by kissing a stranger?

    Reply
  39. Brad grabs her boob for the whole world to see said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:30 am

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/brad-pitt-gropes-angelina-jolie-s-boob-in-front-of-the-world-t247330.html

    There kid is just next to them and he grabs her boob in front of him and the whole world to see

    Disgusting !!!!!!

    Reply
  40. FRIENDS !!!! said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:32 am

    @lory:

    What do you not understand about the fact that they are just FRIENDS !!!!

    Loons are really stupid

    Reply
  41. Disgusting said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:35 am

    I am digusted by the pics of him grabbing her boob. Their kid is sitting next to them. Has he no shame. Disgusting…….

    Reply
  42. Friends said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:36 am

    @lory:

    They are just friends, what is it that you don’t understand that?

    Reply
  43. Odais said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:40 am

    @lory:

    So far I have seen about Jen’s getaway for her 41′S birthday….There’s no any indication of romance between them….He is there like others men. I don’t understand WHY nobody can see to Jen with a man and inmediately link her with that man….& If it is the case that they have something: What is the problem of having an affair with a friend without any commitment????? SHE IS SINGLE, FREE WOMAN….COME ON. She is american girl….She lives in the COUNTRY that is proud of FREEEDOOOMMMM!!!!

    Reply
  44. mooki said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:50 am

    Tom and Katie were @ the Super Bowl too w/ Suri and Connor. it was the night of the attention whores.

    Reply
  45. mooki said on February 8th, 2010 at 7:57 am

    @mooki:
    http://www.popeater.com/2010/02/08/celebrities-super-bowl/
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1249308/Brad-Pitt-Angelina-Jolie-togetherness-join-celebrities-Super-Bowl.html

    also there: Demi and Ashton, JLo and Marc Anthony, Jamie Foxx, Cameron Diaz, Hilary Swank, and Harry Connick Jr.

    btw, Katie has aged A LOT during her time as Cruise’s beard

    Reply
  46. mooki said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:04 am

    @mooki:

    looks like Travolta was there too.

    who pays for these celebs to just sit there and pose for the cameras? they’re not even into football for god’s sakes!

    Reply
  47. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:05 am

    @Odais:

    You obviously didn`t read what Bauergriffin reporters said namely that Jen and Butler headed off to their suite after dinner which was seperate from the mainhouse.

    Reply
  48. Big Applette said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:07 am

    Hmmmm…if Jolie was so interested in football, why did she show up in the 4th quarter?

    Reply
  49. Big Applette said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:12 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I get that she is threatening him but wouldn’t there be a non-disclosure or non-disparagement clause in any agreement they sign dividing assets and providing for custody? Hell, I would think there would be one that is still valid from the Mr. & Mrs. Smith days. He could sue her for any type of negative thing she says. I though Mickey Brett already leaked all the negative stuff Jolie had on Pitt. Maybe she is guaranteeing that photos will get released “anonymously” on the interwebs.

    Reply
  50. Friends said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:22 am

    @lory:

    First : So you believe everything that is written on the nett (offcourse only when it’s jen)
    Second: They had a interview with Acces Hollywood maybe they were on their way to that?

    Reply
  51. jannice said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:30 am

    @lory:

    SO WHAT?????….I LIKE IT….AFFAIR WITHOUT COMMITMENT…SHE IS A SINGLE, FUN AND FREE WOMAN!!!.

    Can you understand that….SHE can Fuck with any MAN that she WANTS…..US FREE COUNTRY…FREE LOVE!!!

    Reply
  52. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:37 am

    @Big Applette:

    You know Pitt and Aniston hired a private judge to deal with their divorce so that no details became public. Only problem with this is that Pitt and Jolie were never married so they CANNOT be divorced. Whenever they split I am sure they announce through People mag website. In the meantime why do you care if they are still together or not? Why do you feel the need to follow this couple that you reportedly can`t even stand? Were does this obsession come from? It`s not like anyone FORCES you to deal with them!

    Reply
  53. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:39 am

    @jannice:

    Free love? Bwahaha. Pr whore! Pr whore Pr whore. If she wanted her relationship with Butler to stay private she shouldn`t have cuddled up to him in front of all cameras at the Golden Globes!

    Reply
  54. Friends said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:41 am

    @lory:

    Why do you care ?

    It seems that you are a brangeloonie so i get it that you don’t understand friendship….

    But you can be friends with a men and nothing more……

    Reply
  55. JinxieGal said on February 8th, 2010 at 8:59 am

    I consider myself a right minded person and I am a regular reader of this site.
    I’ve seen the Super Bowl pictures and they are either totally F’d-up or they are still an affectionate, together couple. I think you have to want/need to read negatives into those pictures to see anything else.

    I give up.

    Reply
  56. Lizzy said on February 8th, 2010 at 9:09 am

    Saw the pictures – Idk, to me it looks like she’s not really into it and the kiss picture actually makes me want to throw up they are not attractive anymore/together!!! I’m still assuming a split is coming but Idk when that will be. If they were so happy why didn’t they fly together. And why did only Maddox go to the game? Wouldn’t Pax have liked to go too?

    Reply
  57. cuze said on February 8th, 2010 at 9:16 am

    If they want to do damage control against the breakup rumors all they have to do is fire Ian’s source. lol
    This source is the one spreading the breakup rumors. This is the part that is very confusing to me.

    Reply
  58. Odais said on February 8th, 2010 at 9:23 am

    @lory:

    SO WHAT????…SHE IS HAVING A GREAT TIME, FUCKING IN FRONT OF THE CAMERA!!! and Laughing a lot of and Playing The HOllywood GAME…What is the problem with THAT??????

    Reply
  59. NE : Bye Brad said on February 8th, 2010 at 9:57 am

    NE : Bye Brad

    Jen Aniston rocked her 41st B-day with new love Gerard Butler after having blown off apologetic, Brad Pitt, telling him defiantly, “”I don’t want you back!. It’s too late for second chances.”

    That’s what Jennifer Aniston had to say when her ex-husband Brad Pitt came crawling back to her, begging for a reconciliation after his recent bustup with Angelina Jolie, pals say.

    But after Jen rejected him, the crushed and insecure Inglourious Basterds star had no choice but to go back to Angelina, tail between his legs, and vow to do whatever she said to make the relationship work.

    “Jen had to wait five years, but she finally got her revenge for Brad’s abandonment,” a close pal divulged to The ENQUIRER.

    “She told Brad point-blank that she could never feel the same about him. She said she was sorry for his misery, but it was just too late to start over.”

    Brad and Angelina’s romance hit an all-time low when it was widely reported the once-golden couple recently met with lawyers to hash out a final division of their assets and custody of their six children.

    “Brad was a mess,” the pal said. “He’s devoted to those children and the only thing that kept him going was that Jen was waiting for him when he and Angie made the final split.”

    But his hopes crumbled during the brief and heartbreaking exchange with Jen following the Hope for Haiti Now benefit in New York on Jan. 22.

    “Brad anticipated Jen taking him back in her arms and embracing the idea of picking up the pieces of their lives together. But he was dead wrong,” according to the pal.

    “Obviously,she couldn’t help but get some satisfaction when Brad broke down and told her he was miserable with Angie and wanted her back.

    “She wasn’t as mean or malicious as she could have been – but she told him flat out that she didn’t want him back and that it was just too late for second chances.”

    The last thing Jen wants at this point in her life is to get Brad on the rebound, maintains the pal.
    “It took her years to get over their divorce and the anguish of Brad leaving her for Angie.

    “She finally feels like she’s regained her footing after working so hard to rebuild her life. She’s not about to risk it all just because Angie kicked Brad in the teeth again.”

    With nowhere else to turn, a stunned Brad returned to Angelina and tried to patch up their crumbling relationship, says the pal.

    Angie isn’t making the reconciliation easy for Brad, says the pal.

    “Now that Jen has turned him down, he feels defeated. The poor guy is like a whipped dog.”

    As for Jennifer, “she’s in the driver’s seat right now, and there’s no way she’s shifting into reverse.”

    Especially with new hottie Gerard Butler in tow for some beach blanket bingo.

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/jen_ani … rity/68116

    Reply
  60. ooops said on February 8th, 2010 at 10:11 am

    @Odais:
    Exactly .She is single and he single .At least she is not fucking a married man like your ideal whore .Speaking of private ha yeah your whore kissed her ass in front of thousands of people yeah that is not publicity .So zip it .

    Reply
  61. Odais said on February 8th, 2010 at 10:42 am

    http://web.nationalenquirer.com/jen_aniston_rejects_brad_pitt_gerard_butler_jolie_divorce/celebrity/68116

    GOOD FOR YOU JEN. You are FREE &&&& SINGLE WOMAN….You can fuck whatever, whenever & whoever YOU WANT…The only thing…KEEEEEPPPPP YOU FAR FAR FAR AWAY AWAY AWAY from MISERABLE BRAD…OH GOD, POOR MAN under control of FETISH ANGELINA. WIP WIP WIP.

    Reply
  62. Susanna said on February 8th, 2010 at 10:42 am

    Brad and Jen were photographed hugging AND kissing on the lips that weekend they announced their separation. So, yeah, to me the Superbowl pics don’t mean much. We know he can act affectionate when he wants to.

    Reply
  63. Kev said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:00 am

    Ian…love your column, but I’m starting to doubt your sources. I don’t care how good of a faker one is, those pics look like they are really into each other. If it were one or two pics, I could say “SETUP”, but I just came from Pittwatch.com, where they have a link to 15 or so pics, and they look very happy in all of them. Did you ever think that maybe YOU are being set up with false sources and false information, because they’re tired of you fu**ing with them? Could you be at the butt end of their joke? Just saying…..

    Reply
  64. chris said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:19 am

    even if i don’t post often, i come here regulary because i enjoy reading the comments, but i’m getting too bored with those two to keep on coming here. i’m tired of them. i dream of a day where there will be no article about them. i actually am surprised there are no more defection like mine. they need too much attention it’s just annoying now.

    Reply
  65. Yorkshire Girl said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:26 am

    Hello, I am a new poster. We all know Angelina is as mad as a hatter and lives her life for photo ops, but I really cannot comprehend why Brad Pitt would go along with this charade, if the situation is as bad as Ian says. They must know that every blog, gossip site, and loads of publications are calling them out on their facade/showmance. I am really surprised that they staged this Superbowl nonsense, especially after BP declined to walk the red carpet with skelewhore at the awards thing the other night. It makes them both look utterly ridiculous.

    I remember the NOTW publishing a story in September (ish) 2004 saying JA overheard phonesex between BP and AJ. It was denied but then lo and behold come January 2005 they split. Perhaps wimp Pitt is pretending to be her bitch still, and behind the scenes leaking stuff to the press to pave the way for the split? In the Mail on Sunday magazine yesterday, Ian wrote a article which said that Jen won’t take him back again, as she wouldn’t sleep with BP again even if he wore 6 condoms after going with that ho bag.

    Ps Lory why do you try to antagonise people? If you don’t like this blog or people’s opinions I suggest you stop reading it and posting. If you don’t like Jen Aniston, big deal, move on and go away.

    Reply
  66. dani said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:37 am

    Well y’all I think they look happy and unposed in the pics. I neither love nor hate the couple, but find both the extreme haters (like many who post here) and the extreme loonies to be beyond comprehension. Or mine at least. None of you know the couple. I do volunteer work with animals in Africa and I can tell you from working with sponsoring organizations that Angie is very highly thought of in the UNHCR and by relief agencies. I also lived in NOLA for many many years and Brad’s work in the 9th ward is also very highly thought of down in New Orleans. Whether you like them or not, they are at least using their fame to do some good unlike all the celebutards out there. Maybe I’m being too Pollyannish–but it wold be nice instead of dragging them down and wishing harm and hurt to them if people focused on the activities and causes they do good for. At least they donate their income to the cult of Scientology which is cruel and hurts people. At least they aren’t promising programs in prison like Hilton and doing nothing There are many stars I don’t care for, but I can admire their devotion to their causes whether it is to gain personal publicity or publicity for the cause. I saw such cruel comment when the JP’s donated a million to help Haiti and yet other movie types who donated money after they did got thumbs up. Just don’t get all the hate you guys have for a couple you’ve never met. And shame on Ian for furthering that hate for hits.

    Reply
  67. Kev said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:38 am

    AMEN Chris!

    Reply
  68. sue said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:42 am

    Wow Ian! You were totally right! I’m impressed with your sources!
    P.S.
    Their over the top display of affection makes me nauseous. Pathetic

    Reply
  69. Kev said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:44 am

    Dani…

    I think what most people are sick of is the fact that EVERY TIME they donate or do something GOOD, they have to publicize it, because they’re fame whores. How many celebutards out there (as you call them) donate and do good SILENTLY. People aren’t questioning their giving, they’re questioning their MOTIVES. People who do good and really mean it, don’t need all the attention and publicity, but yet everytime these two give a buck, here is their publicist putting the word out there to People.com….maybe they should give a little more SILENTLY, and people wouldn’t f**k with them…LOL!

    Reply
  70. StatingMyOpinion said on February 8th, 2010 at 11:54 am

    I wonder just how many beers ole Brad had in him before Angelina showed up??

    So now the public is going to have to deal with her PR photo-shoots in Haiti.

    “Look at how much I care”. BS

    Reply
  71. Tamara said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    For good PR, she couldn’t have picked anything more apple pie to do than attend the SuperBowl IMO – when has she ever been interested in anything at all sports related, I’ve never seen pics of her at any of the Saints games, but I’ve seen a few with Brad and Madd there, I hope she didn’t ruin a special day for father and son. But yea, first a wholesome football game with her guys, then a goodwill trip to Haiti (probably with Madd in tow) will really shine her image right about now.

    Reply
  72. Kate said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    @Kev:
    I watched the youtube they are actors Kev, and they did a good job, but there was no real solid connection between them. They were at a game, Brad loves football so it takes about 90 percent of the tension away right there, add Maddox and the crowd , the beer, not difficult to enjoy the game.I have heard they are not fighting anymore, just done. If they have to put up a front to deflect this story until they are ready they will. Janet Jackson was married for 15 years without anyone ever knowing. There are actors that live separated fro 2-3 years without the public being aware and when they do announce the divorce people are shocked, until they hear they were done years before. Of course they don’t put a show on, but they never did. These two have no choice. She has to be n Venice very soon,very soon. They are just biding their time for the kids imo. I am surprised to see Brad let her bully him to this extent though. jmo

    Reply
  73. Astro said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    UUUUUMMMMMMUUUUMM….IAN Happy new decade!!!!….Brangelina…Static Subject!!!!….Another Fail for the latest news about the break-up, first the failure of the BooK and now this king of PDA….Brad looks so so happy and Angelina Jolie Too…OK…Looking the pictures I think that Maddox is scared!!!.

    ZZZZZzzzzZZZZZzzzZZZZZ….IAN I have told you several times: Brangelina will break up when Nobody is expectind that….People don’t waste your time!!!.

    PD: I am agree with people that talk about Jen, She looks so healthy & happy…Happy Life Jen!!!.

    Reply
  74. RealityCheck said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    @Kev:

    Kev,

    At the end of the day, who cares if they are in love? The truth is (and that’s the truth Jolie and Pitt will never want to look at because it will never do them the favour of growing into something prettier) the public would never engage in predicting their break up every day for the last five years if they didn’t trample on other people’s dignity and feelings to get together. They wouldn’t wait for the right time to display their affair; they wouldn’t consider anybody but their own wants and pleasures; they wouldn’t even wait a little longer to “get pregnant” – and everybody who calls the spade a spade is dubbed a “troll” and “hater”.

    The bottom line is they deserve each other. Why would anyone want to see them split? Just think about it – Pitt chose to stay with a woman who showed that she was fully capable of anything and everything when it came to protecting her own interests: namely, organizing smear campaigns to drag her lover’s ex-wife’s name through the mud because she was oh-so-afraid that people would think she was a home wrecker again (which she was).

    When he realized who he was with and also knew that she was pregnant, I wonder what looked more petrifying to him: the prospect of seeing his perfect image of Hollywood’s wholesome Midwesterner ruined to the base if he dumped Jolie despite her pregnancy OR the prospect of having an entire brood carrying the genes of someone with her history and total lack of scruples and human feelings because that would make his dirty little story look respectable.

    He may have played Achilles on screen but off-screen he didn’t have the basic guts to make the right decision. I am so disappointed with him. He used to be my favourite actor. I guess I’ll still watch his movies because I don’t want to miss out on anything but things will never be the same anymore – I don’t think I will ever derive the same amount of pleasure from watching him as before. In fact, recently I had the chance to see “Meet Joe Black” again but I chose not to see it because it belongs to the times when I respected him so much as a person and an actor.

    RC

    Reply
  75. Kate said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:44 pm

    @Tamara:
    True, but the first to see right through this are men, already various entertainment news are calling it a act, her showboating again. They do more harm than good with these little things. Some suggesting she stalked him but from the you tube it look me. Brad was on board.

    Reply
  76. Kev said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    @RealityCheck:
    I totally agree with you….

    Reply
  77. Kev said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:46 pm

    @Kate:
    I agree with you too…just confusing when you see this crap…

    Reply
  78. Kate said on February 8th, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1249308/Brad-Pitt-Angelina-Jolie-togetherness-join-celebrities-Super-Bowl.html

    So now they have had their lawyers issue a legal statement they are not splitting and they will sue anyone who continues to say they are. They have no intentions of ending their relationship.

    Well there is the denial.

    Reply
  79. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:19 pm

    @Kate:

    It was about time! Damm If I was them I would have issued such a statement 2 years ago when Intouch Weekly started their hate campaign!

    Reply
  80. Astro said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    @Kate:

    I have told you Babbies but nobody believed and I insist they will break up when nobody expected…..Ian’s fans…take a break and go to sleep!!!.

    Reply
  81. jj said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:37 pm

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8505035.stm
    You should read this then !

    Reply
  82. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt sue newspaper for libel said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:37 pm

    Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt sue newspaper for libel
    Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt
    The couple met on the set of the film Mr and Mrs Smith

    Hollywood couple Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are suing the News Of The World newspaper after it published allegations about their relationship.

    In a story published on 24 January, the paper said the couple would separate and had agreed the division of assets and custody of their children.

    The couple’s lawyer, Keith Schilling, called the “widely republished” allegations “false and intrusive”.

    He added the paper had failed to meet “reasonable demands” for an apology.

    He said the pair had also asked for a retraction of the allegations, which had subsequently been “widely republished by mainstream news outlets”.

    Not married

    A statement from Schillings Lawyers also noted that Sorrell Trope, identified by some publications as a divorce lawyer advising Pitt and Jolie, had never met them.

    “I have had no contact from… Angelina Jolie and / or Brad Pitt,” said Trope in a letter quoted in the statement.

    “I have never met… your clients or had any involvement with either of them. The foregoing is true with respect to all other members of this firm.”

    The action comes following the publication by the News of the World of allegations that Jolie and / or Pitt had visited a divorce lawyer in December, and that an agreement had been reached between them regarding custody of their children and the dividing of their joint assets of £205m.

    The newspaper added that the agreement had been signed last month and that the separation would occur imminently.

    A spokesperson for the News Of The World was unable to comment at the time of writing.

    Pitt and Jolie, who are not married, have six children.

    They made a rare public appearance on Sunday night’s Super Bowl, along with their eldest son, Maddox.

    Reply
  83. dani said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    ANGELINA JOLIE AND BRAD PITT SUE NEWSPAPER FOR LIBEL (from the BBC)

    Hollywood couple Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are suing the News Of The World newspaper after it published allegations about their relationship.

    In a story published on 24 January, the paper said the couple would separate and had agreed the division of assets and custody of their children.

    The couple’s lawyer, Keith Schilling, called the “widely republished” allegations “false and intrusive”.

    He added the paper had failed to meet “reasonable demands” for an apology.

    He said the pair had also asked for a retraction of the allegations, which had subsequently been “widely republished by mainstream news outlets”.

    Not married

    A statement from Schillings Lawyers also noted that Sorrell Trope, identified by some publications as a divorce lawyer advising Pitt and Jolie, had never met them.

    “I have had no contact from… Angelina Jolie and / or Brad Pitt,” said Trope in a letter quoted in the statement.

    “I have never met… your clients or had any involvement with either of them. The foregoing is true with respect to all other members of this firm.”

    The action comes following the publication by the News of the World of allegations that Jolie and / or Pitt had visited a divorce lawyer in December, and that an agreement had been reached between them regarding custody of their children and the dividing of their joint assets of £205m.

    The newspaper added that the agreement had been signed last month and that the separation would occur imminently.

    A spokesperson for the News Of The World was unable to comment at the time of writing.

    Pitt and Jolie, who are not married, have six children.

    They made a rare public appearance on Sunday night’s Super Bowl, along with their eldest son, Maddox.

    Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/02/08/brad-angelina-super-bowl-kiss/comment-page-10/#comments#ixzz0eyGvKmI0

    Reply
  84. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    @dani:

    Damm I was just about to post that article but you beat me!

    Reply
  85. billiebob said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    How anybody can’t for the life of them figure out why so many hate these two is beyond comprehension. Angelina gets so much praise for doing what other ppl do every damn day. And, yet they also manage to keep it out of the public eye. Ashley Judd has been doing what AJ is doing for years–way back when Angie was still fucking her brother. But, ppl act as if she is the first person on the planet to donate her time to worthy causes. She is nothing special. And, I doubt AJ is highly respected in that organization. Please. The only time she start this humanitarian bs is when she has a movie to promote or when she is trying to deflect rumors. There are ppl that do it 24/7 and they don’t get any attention.

    Reply
  86. Astro said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    @Kate:
    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Ian: You will be the next target, I mean, Brangelina will sue you!!!!….Or Maybe NOT because of the disaster of your boo, but Be carefull!!!!…Kate/Keane you have been the collaborator of IAN, maybe Brangie will go against you TOO….I hope NOT, really!!!

    Reply
  87. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    I’m sorry butI just think that series of photos is one of the funniest things I have seen in years! Do they not both look completely ridiculous to you? I have never seen two people look so awkward and so false as these two look here. There’s one photo where Brad is leaning over with his bum in the air to hug Angelina around her top half but making sure the rest of his body is anywhere near her. Ho-bag has dropped her ice princess, holier-than-thou, Queen of HW style for the first time in years and now looks like an over-animated wax work dummy. I mean these photos are weird aren’t they? They’re even weirder than the ones at Clint Eastwood’s premiere to me. Oh good Lord, do you think she just showed up and Brad had to play along? I mean, if you’re married with SIX KIDS don’t you usually go out together? Puh-lease, this is making them look so foolish. I think they’re doing their brand more harm than good with all these shenanigans, and if she caps it off with a Haiti photo opp – perfectly timed, a beat after all the other celebtity-based fundraising activites have taken place so the focus is solely on her – I think they can say buh-bye to their moneymaker. Brand Brangelina cannot survive such obvious f*ckery like this methinks.

    Reply
  88. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    You forgot one thing Keane! Pitt was successful when he was single, he was successful when he dated Paltrow, he was successful when he was married to Aniston and he is still succesful now that he is with Jolie! So tell me again why does he need the “brand” Brangelina?

    Reply
  89. RealityCheck said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    Just wondering: If Jolie never organized the smear campaign against Jennifer Aniston, which aimed to portray her as a woman who had only herself to blame for the end of her marriage because she never wanted kids, why doesn’t she try to sue Ian for libel?

    If I were her and had to choose between two insults – 1) my relationship with my partner isn’t going well, so we are headed for Splitsville or 2) I am a total bitch who not only breaks another woman’s marriage but also wants to see her ridiculed and despised by the general population in my place – I would have chosen the latter: it sounds so much worse than the break-up rumours that there’s simply no comparison.

    The simple conclusion might be that Jolie’s smear campaign is the truth, so she hopes that by ignoring it she will make it non-existent. A case of misidrection again.

    Reply
  90. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    @lory:

    Hi Mia, how you been?

    Reply
  91. RealityCheck said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    @lory:

    Lory,

    One of the funniest pieces of crap produced by Jolie’s fans I’ve ever come across was that Pitt became a much better actor after meeting her. I saw it on “Just Jared”. Given how much they annoy me with the mere fact of their existence, I wonder why I still pass by that website in the first place but then they give birth to such masterpieces of idiocy every day that I simply can’t resist the temptation to see their latest wisdom.

    RC

    Reply
  92. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    @Astro:

    They can if they like, it will be incredible for their image! We can analyse all the photographic evidence of her relationship with her brother, evidence about her illegal adoptions, where all the money in the Jolie-Pitt foundation does or doesn’t go, the multi-million dollar deals they have with pap agencies and numerous major brands for endorsements, we can get them to do drugs tests on strands of their hair, we can look at the records of her mental illness, all this can be revealed on the stand and proved in a court of law. Tell me, Astro, if you were them, would you go to court over this?

    Reply
  93. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:32 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    And don’t even get me started on those “twins”. I’m not sure inviting an even greater degree of scrutiny into their family affairs may be such a good thing, but they clearly must feel that they have nothing left to lose. Silly Brad, he should have bailed on that b*tch before it came to this. Now he will go down with this ship. It could have all been so different too.

    Reply
  94. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:33 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    You mean Ian has tapes of Jolie fucking a dog, her brother, the president and even her own kids as Ian claimed? If he has then why hasn`t he already published them or even better sold them to the NE for a million dollars?
    I tell you why: because they don`t exist. Any any such claim brought in court will indeed get him convicted for libel!

    Reply
  95. RealityCheck said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:35 pm

    Gee! I just saw the video clip made of their pictures from the Superbowl and I must say I have never seen anything faker in my whole life! Here is a link – judge for yourself:

    http://www.pittwatch.com/photos-of-brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-at-the-superbowl/

    Of course, the Brangelunatics will always know better but all I get is two people striving hard to look over the moon with happiness. If I had to strive that hard to lie to the entire world, I would be miserable!

    Reply
  96. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    @RealityCheck:

    How exactly does your answer refer to my post? Is that the way you want to show your superior interlect? Well try harder then!

    Reply
  97. Yorkshire Girl said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    The significant thing in the future will be whether or not Haggerdalina actually do sue the NOTW. Or have they just published a threat to sue, if so that means nothing.

    If they do go ahead and sue, it will be interesting to see if they settle out of court before it goes to trial. Many public figures call the publishers bluff and then back out and end up paying the publishers legal fees at the last minute (like Neil Hamilton and the Guardian etc)

    Although the NOTW is a tabloid and tabloids do embellish stories, I do not think twat faced Murdoch would have put the paper in a position where haggerdalina could sue for defamation. It is not a fantastic scoop or exclusive for the NOTW to publish an article about Haggerdalina splitting when there are already so many similar stories all over the web and in magazines every week (E.G Now, Heat, Grazia, Look and in the states US Weekly, In Touch and Life and Style etc) Especially as they had the BIGGER story of John Terry’s affair to break. In tabloid terms that is the far bigger story in ENGLAND where it sells copies, than another break up story on two Hollywood cranks.

    I think Haggerdalina will not sue, how can two media whores prove that the article lowered the opinions of right minded people?? The NOTW legal team must be confident that they can plead justification, fair comment, or qualified privilege and they only need to win on one of the defenses. Also when it comes to damages which jury could award this two mind boggling idiots a penny?

    In my neck of the water (UK) everyone I know hates them. BUT If they did win how much are you betting they would donate it to the Jolie -Pitt foundation…..ie the big charity joke that is funded by them selling pictures of their children, product endorsements and by proceeds they receive from picture agencies……If people do the simple math and weigh up the amount the “foundation” has made versus how much they donate-to the fanfare of golden trumpets- (and the massive amount of interest the capital generates-not forgetting the HUGE tax relief savings) they would see what a pair of absolute cretins these twats really are.

    Reply
  98. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:38 pm

    @RealityCheck:

    Well if it makes you happy or hot you may believe as you choose! But how about sparing anyone else with your obsessed hatred for 2 strangers?

    Reply
  99. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    @lory:

    Mia, Ian doesn’t need any tapes of the brother-snogging, Angelina was kind enough – in her much less media-savvy days – to do that in the full glare of the world’s photographers. There are literally dozens of pictures on the net of her locking lips with her brother, even one from the cover of a magazine where they both have their eyes closed as they enjoy the kiss. It is as blatant as her declaration of love for her brother in her Oscar acceptance speech, she has just managed to distract people from it and so cover it up. And as for the dog, Bill Clinton and her kids well did you hear me mentioning any of those things? I am talking about things that are easy to prove in a court of law. And the things I listed are. No need to go down the road of subpoenaing an ex-President to prove Angie Jo is a ho. Not that our Bill exaclty has a great track record in that area already after all!

    Reply
  100. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    @Yorkshire Girl:

    So in your neck of the wood people rather hate 2 celebs instead of their collegues and or neighbours who have an affair? I can see how it is safer to hate 2 strangers especially if you can cyberstalk them on the internet and say whatever hateful comment enters your mind without any consequences! The anonymety of the net certainly has lowered people`s decency to below zero.

    Reply
  101. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    @Yorkshire Girl:

    Spoken like a true Northener! Lol. By the way, John Terry is a tw*t isn’t he? I am so glad he has finally had his very public comeuppance!

    Reply
  102. RealityCheck said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    @lory:
    First of all, it’s spelled “intellect” – not “interlect”. Sorry to disappoint you, honey, but it’s not only my intellect that is superior to yours – my spelling is superior to yours, too.

    Obsessed hatred? You’re missing a serious point here – I don’t hate; I’m just having fun with two strangers that I would never have fun with if they didn’t make fun of themselves before anybody else did.

    For the record, this is Ian Halperin’s blog and you are out of place here. Now take your naive teenage alias and go back to “Just Jared”, where the pathetic creatures like you belong.

    Reply
  103. Astro said on February 8th, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Keane, you and Ian’s Fans are amazing, since I have been checking this site and taken in account all the things about Brangelina that Ian and all of his fans have written here, most of the time everybody here has requested proof of them and written denials about the break up. There have been pictures about their love (False or NOT, ACT or NOt, Fake or not) but you had pictures. Now, all of you have the written denial in a newspaper and all the websites, and the threat of legal action that they will take about Tabloids, Ian and YOU….but it is not enough.

    So my only conclusion now is, You see whatever you want to see, you believe whatever you want to believe, like Brad decided to go against the world because of HER (Angelina) and abandoned a beautiful, sweet and normal wife and NOW He has decided to be at Angelina’s side again, you can keep your choice to continue to waste your time with them, someday they will break up (I have told you several times, remember that), but when nobody expects that, not, when you or Ian want.

    Take care.

    Reply
  104. RealityCheck said on February 8th, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    Astro,

    Your notion of Brangelina’s relationship is too romantic for this world. “Brad decided to go against the world because of HER (Angelina)”? He didn’t “go against the world” – he tried to collaborate with it and get it on his side by pretending that he was in love with her. There was no other way as he faced the prospect of losing his public image of many years.

    If you really love someone and are prepared to go to any length for your love, you can wait and you will wait for the right time to show it, so that nobody has anything bad to say about it. Instead they shoved it rudely and blatantly into anybody’s face through the media as if they had nothing to care about.

    It’s not the problem that he left his wife – men leave their wives every single day. The problem is HOW he did it and WHO he did it.

    :)

    Reply
  105. Kev said on February 8th, 2010 at 3:42 pm

    @lory:
    successful? his MOVIES may be successful, but him personally…what has won lately? LOL!

    Reply
  106. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    @Kev:
    @RealityCheck:

    Well if you have no problem with adultery – as you just admitted – then stop accusing them of it!
    By the way it is good to know that there is no bigger horror in the world today then 2 actors appearing in a promoition spread for their latest movie as Brangelina did for Mr & Mrs Smith!

    Reply
  107. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    @Astro:

    Astro hun, this has been your schtick for a long time I know, but tell me why do you believe that everything that ever comes out of a celebrity’s mouth and everything they do in the full glare of the media spotlight (the Superbowl for God’s sake, I mean this was one stage down from hiring a jet plane and getting it to spell “Brangelina have not split (at least for the sake of their brand and relieving you of a few more million of your hard-earned dollars of course)” is the truth? For the whole time you have commented on this site, a good year now it must almost be, you never once seem to have grasped or even considered the concept that CELEBRITIES WILL DO OR SAY ANYTHING TO KEEP THEIR CAREERS AND MAKE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, INCLUDING BUT NOT WHOLLY CONFINED TO L*Y*I*N*G!!!!!!! I cannot emphasise this last word enough: celebrities lie all the time, all the bleeding time, every word they say in the public realm is not honesty but a lie or spin designed to sell them to their audience so they are a marketable device for films they star in and therefore WILL GET WORK. How more simply can I break it down for you? Being a “star” is a celebrity’s JOB and movie-making is a BUSINESS. Everyone is in it to make MONEY. And in order to make MONEY in this very competitive market, they will do or say ANYTHING. I honestly do not understand how you have failed for all this time to grasp this basic concept! Farewell though Astro and good luck!

    Reply
  108. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Just like you have failed to realize that Pitt was succesful with Paltrow, with Aniston and with Jolie! And yes even back when he dated various rather unknown starlets! So how exactly does he need the Brand that brought him the worst headlines in his career since his split with Paltrow?

    Reply
  109. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 8th, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    @lory:

    Sweetheart you are going off on some odd tangent that has nothing to do with what is being discussed whatsoever! But just to relieve you of your anxieties, I will spell it out to you. Brad Pitt has always had a famous dame on his arm to sell his movie magic. There has literally never been a minute in Brad’s career history where he wasn’t dating someone who would get him lots of attention. His brand has ALWAYS been Brad + one, and it always will be. You mark my words, when the split with Angelina is done and dusted, he will move on to the next one. Or maybe he will return to an old favourite who knows? We shall soon see anyway!

    Reply
  110. lory said on February 8th, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    So does that mean that Pitt has to stay single in order to convince you that he doesn`t use his realtionships for publicity like Jen when she snuggled up to Butler in front of all the cameras at the Golden Globes?

    Reply
  111. jannice said on February 8th, 2010 at 5:40 pm

    @RealityCheck:

    Come on…Baby…Continue living in the clouds…I won’t waste my time with you!!!…I was talking with KEANE.

    Reply
  112. dani said on February 8th, 2010 at 6:43 pm

    @reality check

    So what you are saying is that it is okay for Brad to have left JA as long as he did it in a timeframe YOU approved with a woman YOU approved?

    Reply
  113. ROV said on February 8th, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    @lory:

    they are public figures. they have chosen this profession so they must be able to take the dirt as it’s dished. otherwise get out of the ring. the lawsuit appears to be more damage control than anything else. if they don’t care what the tabs say as they have previously stated, then why would they bother.

    you keep mentioning Pitt and his relationships. unfortunately, his previous ex’s weren’t such fame whores as his current spouse. we didn’t see so many staged photo ops. hell, i recall seeing pitt and an ex in their birthday suits. which they obviously would not want leaked…. particularly pitt.
    all the jolie/pitt pictures have been staged, right from day one. heck, they should write a book “the art of deceit and fame whoring”. i think that’s why people are so interested…. in seeing the end of this facade. you can put lipstick on a pig but at some point you have to face the fact that it is still a pig.

    as far as not using relationships for publicity – they accepted vast amounts of money from various magazines for pictures of their children. i don’t care what the money was used for or what rationale they wanted everyone to believe – that was just wrong. they should let the kids decide if they want this fishbowl life on their own, which they are obviously too young to do. they should be protecting those kids from publicity, but instead they whore them out. for a price, even. *tsk tsk* and that applies to all celebs that do that to their kids, by the way. not just these idiots.

    and have a wonderful day.

    Reply
  114. Jalyn said on February 8th, 2010 at 10:30 pm

    we’re so together….blah blah blah

    really who gives a rats a** anymore…
    does anyone really care about them but
    them?

    they’re up to something and i’d say from
    the pics they’re in it together…that says
    something right there….and not something
    good about pitt….idiot boy

    used to be i couldn’t stand jolie; now
    i can’t stand either one of them.

    i used to want to see pitt get out; not
    so much now..now i say let them fall
    big time and fall together and be stuck
    miserably together forever….

    Reply
  115. lory said on February 9th, 2010 at 12:42 am

    @ROV:

    Well then be fair and critisize ALL celebs on a daily basis and not just them!

    Reply
  116. alif said on February 9th, 2010 at 1:32 am

    @ROV:
    ITA!

    There’s an old story about the “nobody” who did everything in his power, using whoever he would to become famous; then, when he did become famous, he started wearing sunglasses, even at night, so he wouldn’t be recognized.

    Updated! He wears those sunglasses at night, so we won’t see his eyes! His eyes, as we all know, are the windows of his soul!

    It goes way back. The columnists used to remind actors, that if and when they chose show business for a career, they’d better stay reminded that the public will have their say! The public being the party who keeps them super-rich, famous and powerful!

    Reply
  117. Yorkshire Girl said on February 9th, 2010 at 3:16 am

    Lory,

    You accuse everyone else of being obsessed with two complete strangers, but you post more than anyone else, so what does that say about you? Why do you come to a well known blog that ridicules Haggardalina and calls them out on their sh*t? Obviously just to bait people, which makes you more pathetic than anyone else.

    And FYI Anonymity is spelled like that, not “anonymety”. Please do not attempt to lecture me on having no decency, or standards below zero. The whole point of why people dislike Haggardalina so much (which your tiny mind seems unable to grasp) is because they have NO standards of decency. They do what they like, when they like, and don’t mind who they step on to get their own way.If it was just these two bumbling wax work faced idiots together, I don’t think people would be as bothered, but the fact that they collect children sticks in a lot of peoples throats. Why is a self-confessed lunatic able to adopt?

    Hey, let me go down to the local mental hospital and check in because the old scroat I am lusting after won’t leave his fiance and marry me. Then I’ll hire a hit man to kill…me. ( I never really got that because I thought hit men kept on coming until the target was dead; The Bodyguard anyone?) Can’t that bitch do anything right? Then when I do succeed in snaring the (booby prize) Billy-Bob Goat everything will be all golden and wonderful, and I will snatch, I mean adopt a child from a third world country to be my new accessory, sorry son, to fill an aching void in my life, because I am a crank.

    Even back then, I will stage and sell pictures of Maddox and I playing in the park, all dressed in white, to show the world how decent and good and shiny I am (and of course to show the old Billy-Bob Goat what he is missing). Is that decent behaviour?

    Then, along with my oddball brother, I will conduct a smear campaign against my partners ex wife, making up stories to paint her in the worst possible light and to try to deflect attention from the fact that I am a disgusting tramp, is that decent? All the while chatting about our great sex life, our naked bath sessions, our huge bed for the family, how we fell in love while he was still married, ho ho ho, how did that one slip out…….

    Then I will go out to work and leave the six nannies to fend for the six children, whilst planning to acquire more. Never mind that I don”t have enough time for the old ones, who cares whether or not they have adjusted to their new home and surroundings? Stability, routine, quality time? I am the star and my needs come before everyone elses. Is that decent?

    Then I will totally believe all the bull shit hype that’s written about me on love fest arse licking sites like JJ by 10 years olds, or adult retards, and introduce my new children to the world, in several, sickening magazine spread. I will earn millions and millions and millions of dollars for selling my children, but will justify it by saying “well there was a price on their head Diane, at least this way it was controlled, it was done our way and better for the rugrats” etc etc “and of course the money will go to charity”….and then donate the money to my own company. According to my PR plan, every so often I will donate here and there from the interest that has built up on the money……keeping the capital in trust FOR ME…..is that decent?

    And I will use any ploy available to garner sympathy for myself…crying on telly, releasing private family videos that should be kept PRIVATE ( stooping to an all time low with that one may I add).

    I for one hope these hypocritical idiots do not break up, they deserve each other. It is sad the way Brad has gone. Oh well Karma is a bitch. If he had any sense he would get out now and try to re-build his repuatation, but by going along with everything, he is sinking deeper and deeper in to a puddle of sewage.

    Yes Keane, I am glad Terry got his. I dislike most footballers, overpaid chavs! Ps Love your comments

    And Rov, somewhere in the world BP is putting lipstick on AJ’s big fat pillow lips…

    Reply
  118. Reality Check said on February 9th, 2010 at 3:26 am

    @jannice:
    Jannice, I don’t recall talking to you at all, so your post is surprising – unless you are Lory or Astro under another name. This is the first time I’ve ever talked to you – are you sure you’re not hallucinating?

    @dani:
    Dani, you saw in my post what was in your own head and you projected it on me. Do you always project your own subconscious on other people’s words? All I meant was that marriages end every day – it’s sad but they end. Even the best of people can fall out of love with someone they have been in love with. What makes you a real human being is how you treat your wife in the aftermath of the break-up. But I guess that’s too complicated for you to see.

    @lory:
    Lory, darling, you are beginning to annoy me. Go somewhere to grow up before you continue posting on blogs. Do you enjoy twisting other people’s words when you feel short of good arguments? If I had no problem with adultery, I wouldn’t be on this kind of topic. Especially adultery which is flagrantly displayed by two people who think they are above the rules and then try to pass themselves for role models. But I guess that’s too complicated for you to figure out at this stage.

    Reply
  119. Reality Check said on February 9th, 2010 at 3:39 am

    @Yorkshire Girl:
    Great post.

    Reply
  120. Yorkshire Girl said on February 9th, 2010 at 3:51 am

    To RC
    Ditto! At least some of us can call a spade a spade….

    Reply
  121. lory said on February 9th, 2010 at 4:32 am

    @alif:

    That may be true within certain limits but with Brangelina the mags have crossed all lines of decency years ago. What Intouchweekly is doing on a weekly basis has nothing to do with just publishing gossip on occassion and all with profiting from their hate campaign that targets disappointed lovers of the former “golden couple” Pitt/Aniston such as these FF freaks and you people here.

    Reply
  122. cc said on February 9th, 2010 at 7:17 am

    @lory:

    Are you the “CAPS LOON” from FF? You are annoying. Truth.

    Reply
  123. joanne said on February 9th, 2010 at 8:45 am

    Lol now Brangelina is following the Cruises footsteps. The only difference is one has a messed up religion and the has no religion. I wish everyone would grant them their wish and not give them any attention. That would also drive Miss Voight over the edge..no media attention. I am finally bored with the JP’s and hope those 4 or 6 kids luck. They don’t look happy (another difference, Suri looks happy). Remember when Spears train was wrecking? Eveyone said she deserved the bad with the good. She didn’t sue everyone..someone loved her enough to get her help. The j/p’s need to follow Spears, not Cruise.

    Reply
  124. Emerson said on February 9th, 2010 at 9:07 am

    WAY too funny all these posts! What everyone seems to forget is that both Angelina and Brad are oscar nominated and oscar winner actors, it’s obvious to everyone that they are just continuing to “act” their love life in the public…it looks forced and a bore, and Brad is pathetic…I am glad Jen won’t take Brad back, who would want to risk all the disease that is most likely carried by Angelina..OH is she going to sue me now???? hahahaha

    Reply
  125. Emerson said on February 9th, 2010 at 9:10 am

    oh MY just watched the Super Bowl pics, and ya know, how did Angie ever win an oscar?? The oscar for best actor/actress at the Super Bowl goes to…..dadum…Maddox!!

    Reply
  126. Tamara said on February 9th, 2010 at 9:23 am

    @Yorkshire Girl:
    LOL – this is an old argument with “Lory” I mean Guest123 oops I mean MIA – one I have given up long ago due to frustration!! She accuses us of being obsessed but refuses to look at her own serial posting. Trying to reason with her is an act of futility IMO. Good Morning everyone! I see you’ve all been busy little bees.

    Reply
  127. Yorkshire Girl said on February 9th, 2010 at 9:48 am

    @Tamara:

    Ha. Yes, I have been reading this site for ages and enjoying all the comments by the regulars, before I posted yesterday. I thought that she may have been a paid person for Brad’s camp, but she doesn’t seem intelligent enough. I really don’t know where she finds the time to post, berating everyone else for posting; isn’t she supposed to be on a whistle stop tour of Thailand?

    On another note, I really cannot abide Murdoch and all he stands for, but on this one occasion, I hope he flexes his global media clout and wipes the floor with these two ragged upstarts.

    Reply
  128. Tamara said on February 9th, 2010 at 10:04 am

    @Yorkshire Girl:
    Well, I am glad you decided to participate because your posts are frankly hilarious! LOL And…Im glad you’re writing, because if I were in York having a conversation with you I wouldn’t be able to understand one single word you say! hahahaha Ditto for Liverpudlians, the Northern Welsh and most Scots except my darling hubby of course! LOL

    Reply
  129. Reality Check said on February 9th, 2010 at 12:08 pm

    @Yorkshire Girl:
    Who says Brad’s camp hires only intelligent people to make posts on his behalf? And who says they hire any intelligent people at all? I don’t see how anyone intelligent will sign up for praising a lost cause born in a quagmire of scandal that will never be forgotten until all the players pass away. Personally, I am quite convinced they also pay some pretty unintelligent types to simply disrupt the conversations that don’t praise them to the sky.

    I don’t know who Lory is and I don’t care – all her posts make me think she needs a crash course in English spelling as well as someone telling her that any cause can be ruined by poor spelling. As for Jannice, I am quite sure that’s Astro under another name – it’s Astro who enjoys using “… Continue living in the clouds … I won’t waste my time with you … blah, blah, blah, etc.”. I have read that before. Besides I got that answer after addressing Astro.

    Interesting how some people use multiple aliases to convince the others that their opinion is backed by many people on the same blog. It looks like schizophrenia to me. Oops! Lory, I hope a word like “schizophrenia” doesn’t sound too intellectual to you – you seem to get depressed by anybody sounding even remotely intellectual. Perhaps you should buy a dictionary for advanced learners, so that you enrich your vocabulary and stop feeling depressed.

    :)

    Reply
  130. Pattyanne said on February 9th, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    I wonder why only Jolie wears and I.D. neck tag while Brad and Mad Max don’t? They were invited? She crashed and needed a pass to get access? Hummmmmmm@jannice:

    Reply
  131. John said on February 9th, 2010 at 11:21 pm

    @cuze:
    I thought they were breaking up you fagggg

    Reply
  132. alif said on February 9th, 2010 at 11:43 pm

    @lory:
    What InTouch Weekly does is nothing compared to what web sites such as Just Jared and Perez-Hilton has done to Jennifer Aniston. And Jen was the one who was dumped. This doesn’t enter the minds of the loonies, at all! Well, if it does, they freely choose to support the evildoers.
    And of course, the tabs and mags that were in cahoots with the loonies’ pov.

    Jennifer has taken the high road. And now Angelina Jolie is “suffering” because the people are now catching on to what has transpired. Thanks in a large part to Ian!

    If Angie is suffering, as is reported, let her leave the business, that is the source of so much agony!
    One day she says she’ll quit films; the next , she signs up for more movies.

    There are always maniacs who rabidly follow evildoers! It’s well-documented in the history of America.
    Charles Manson, who orchestrated the murder of Sharon Tate, and several others, gets/has gotten
    bagsful of fan mail.
    Death row inmates not only get fan mail, but marriage proposals.
    And I haven’t even mentioned the Cult of Scientology!

    So, get to know what’s good and what’s evil. If you can, then you’ll never be a loonie!

    Reply
  133. alif said on February 10th, 2010 at 12:02 am

    @joanne:
    Good show!
    I followed the posts on Katie’s “pregnancy’ in the latter months, on Defamer.com (which used to be “edgy” and is now quite lame). Bloggers noted the changing shapes of Katie’s belly. It was very well-noted. Many of the posters were women. Some actually supported the pov that Katie was indeed preggers! But most said that, no, it wasn’t real.
    In like fashion, there were the discussions of Suri’s “birth certificate”. It looked fake, according to most. What they argued about was the actual month of Suri’s birth!; (thus the changing shape of Katie’s abdomen in the final stages of her pregnancy.)

    One is suspicious that Tommy tried to convert BP when they made a movie, together. But he surely had his innings because they followed TC’s path. Now, they’ve taken to sue anyone who claims they’re through, just as TC sued anyone who questioned his sexuality. That is, until he sued the wife of a man who told her that TC and her husband did make out. Well, TC lost that one. The lawsuits stopped; at least, as of now!
    And none transpired when one of the members of The Village People group stated (just last year) that little Tommy C. ” serviced” him.

    There is a big difference, as well! TC dominates his partner, while BP is dominated by his!

    Reply
  134. pickwick said on February 10th, 2010 at 11:00 am

    @Astro:
    Hi Astro! I haven’t been on a couple of days. I think you make a good point with people seeing what they want to see –even when there are photos that show the opposite. I have many times seen photos of a celeb fooling around with someone (not their partner) only to read comments that say that it’s obvious the two are just friends and everyone has a dirty mind to think differently.

    I’ve wondered why these two–angie and brad—annoy me so much. I mean—I don’t like Tom Cruise or Mel Gibson but I don’t read about them, either. So what is it with this couple? It’s not the jennifer aniston thing because I’m not crazy about jennifer aniston. She’s fine but I don’t think about her.

    I think it’s the image they’ve carved for themselves as the ultimate prom king and queen who are the ultimate idea of morality and ethics and all human kindness. This morning is a good example. I watch the Today Show and they made a lot of Angelina going to Haiti for a humanitarian mission. She stayed the night. And then left. What was she doing? Drawing attention to the plight of the Haitians? I think there is plenty of attention and that isn’t a problem. Did she DO something? I don’t think so. They didn’t mention anything on the news that she did besides land her plane. It just smacks of what John Edwards did: flying to Haiti and making sure the news media knew about it and then getting out of there. That kind of thing just annoys me. Also, selling photos of your newborns when you don’t need the money. Promising it to charity and not giving it to charity. Adopting a child sounds so loving, but she adopts a kid who is already at least seven and changes his name at the same time she pulls him away from everyone and everything he knows. Why change his name? Why bring People magazine to photograph this very vulnerable child in his most vulnerable moment—his first night away?

    Does any of that bother you at all?

    I do understand where you’re coming from when you wonder why bash people we don’t know. If these two would just admit they are normal people who happen to act in films I think I could accept them much easier. They don’t want to admit they are even human like the rest of us.

    Reply
  135. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 10th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    @pickwick:

    Pickwick I just wrote a post about the Haiti photocall on the other thread to the same effect. How is Angelina justifying this trip? What does she say she was there to do? They normally use the old chestnut that she is there to “draw attention to the cause” but we all know about this cause as we have had blanket coverage on the news. She can’t say it is to make sure the world doesn’t forget as it is so recent it is still in the forefront of our minds. So what was she there for? She has no authority or power in the UN, she is just an “ambassador”, like 50 or so other celebrities, one of them – correct me if I’m wrong – being Miley Cyrus. She has not been doing anything in the media with regard to fundraising like pretty much everyone else in HW. No, she considered herself too big to participate in that telethon, and didn’t want to come across as just the same as any other HW star. She had to separate herself out and act like the Queen of HW she thinks she is. So she waited a beat for the telethon to be over and the attention on people like George Clooney and Wyclef Jean to abate, and then she made her move. Last of all, so everyone would notice her. Previously she issued a statement through the CEO of one of her pet charities to the effect that “SOS Villages are there before and after the cameras stop rolling. So is Angelina Jolie”. That is actually what it said and to me it was breathtaking in it’s utter vulgarity. Why on earth would anyone seek to promote themselves when hundreds of thousands of people have just died? Who cares where Angelina Jolie is, before or after the cameras stop rolling (well apart from her obviously, she doesn’t do anything when the cameras stop rolling)? Why did she show up in the Dominican Republic today? Was it to get down on her hands and knees and start a 14 hour shift providing food and health care to the orphans? Was it to assess the situation and then return to the organisation she represents and spend weeks working on plans to help those in need and rebuild the city? Was it to decide how much more of her $100 million fortune she wanted to give to them and on what? I’ve heard this story reported in a number of news sources but no rationale as to why she was there. Perhaps one of her loon supporters or PR flack employees could enlighten me?

    Reply
  136. Reality Check said on February 10th, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    @pickwick:

    Pickwick,

    You just found a definition that nailed Pitt and Jolie to the wall like nothing before! “The ultimate prom king and queen who are the ultimate idea of morality and ethics and all human kindness”. I couldn’t have agreed more! If they just admitted they’d had an on-set affair like other Hollywood actors in history, they would be instantly perceived as humans and soon forgiven by everybody. In short, they would have ended up more respected than they are now – but no, they had to adopt a holier-than-thou attitude and throw Jennifer Aniston under the bus to look better in the public eye. They had to portray her as selfish, career-minded, self-absorbed woman who ignored her husband’s feelings and put her own wants above his wants.

    Five years later, the damage is done and nothing can change the fact that there are people who will always believe that she was left because “she was not all that”. I’ve come across horrible insults against her, including one that talked about “her dusty and barren womb”. Those insults are the product of Angelina Jolie’s orchestrated campaign. When you read something like that, you simply have no choice but to get involved and so I did! I wouldn’t be a woman if I simply looked on as another woman was treated like that while her husband’s bitch of a year posed for the cameras as the perfect mother and humanitarian with all the babies her money could buy.

    You see, the bitch doesn’t mind building stability for herself with another woman’s husband on a quagmire of scandal and personal tragedies but she insists on being remembered as a saint even if that means the truth will be buried for ever under a mountain of lies produced by her brother, her manager and her entire team on her command! Strange, isn’t it, how sensitive she is to her own feelings provided she doesn’t care about the feelings of anybody else! She seems to be the most sensitive bulldozer that ever “graced” the public eye: “I may have smashed, injured and robbed other people of their happiness on my way but I insist on being known as someone who cares about the world’s suffering.”

    Then, a couple of months ago, I was horrified to read those pages in Ian’s book, where he tells about Jennifer’s miscarriages because that was the first time I realized how deep her trauma was and where Jolie’s campaign actually hit. Jolie knew about the miscarriages from Pitt and yet she resorted to the smear tactic. Jennifer has taken so much abuse from these hypocrites and their psycho fans and still takes it and yet she’s found a way to live and let go. She’s damned if she speaks and damned if she doesn’t! Given how much abuse she’s taken for nothing, she carries with unbelievable grace! Yet I’m sure the loons will jump immediately to yell that this is nothing next to the abuse that “poor Angie has endured for just loving” as if someone that manipulative and mean can love anybody but herself.

    Reply
  137. alif said on February 10th, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    I’m one who believes in the sanctity of marriage. But the bloggers who call her St. Angie, after she spat into the idea of the sanctity of marriage is certainly my idea of twisted thinkers.

    Reply
  138. max said on February 10th, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    Astro
    Here is a prediction. Angelina and Brad break up after Salt is released. This woman wants no negative PR until after Salt is released. She can say and do what she wants but the “Brand” is irreparably damaged. I bet that she sees it as cutting her losses or she makes him look bad first.

    Reply
  139. pickwick said on February 11th, 2010 at 9:48 am

    @Reality Check:
    I love what you said:
    Strange, isn’t it, how sensitive she is to her own feelings provided she doesn’t care about the feelings of anybody else! She seems to be the most sensitive bulldozer that ever “graced” the public eye: “I may have smashed, injured and robbed other people of their happiness on my way but I insist on being known as someone who cares about the world’s suffering.”

    And Keane, I was amazed to read the statement about Jolie being there after the cameras stop rolling. That’s a joke. The cameras are ALWAYS rolling when she makes drops down from the clouds to sit at a distance from a refugee. And she leaves with the cameras.

    I do think that what you said is right. If they would just admit they are human. If she would go on Oprah and say “You know, it’s tough. I have a hard time doing it all. I wish I could be a better mom. I have some regrets. I’m only human just like everyone else.”—that would help. But her touch-down in Haiti was more of the same, and the same is profiting off desperate tragedies. Why does she never stay more than a day in any of these places?

    Also, I don’t know how anyone could take up for her decision to take her young son to Iraq for a photo shoot.
    Maybe she really doesn’t see other people as real people but as extensions of herself and her image? I don’t know. If so, that would be a classic narcissistic mom, and the kids of those moms have problems later.

    Reply
  140. marty said on February 11th, 2010 at 10:04 am

    @Disgusting:
    It goes to show you that he was not in a ‘good state of mind’, in another words, ‘drunk’. A sober person wouldn’t do that.

    Reply
  141. marty said on February 11th, 2010 at 10:12 am

    @pickwick:
    WOA! I couldn’t have say it better.

    Reply
  142. Cee said on February 11th, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    Here’s the latest from TedC:
    For everyone who thinks we hate Angelina Jolie, you’re totally wrong. Let’s just say we know everything in the Brangelina household is hardly peachy friggin’ keen, the way she and Brad so want you to believe.

    Angie just does a much better job at taking the attention off of herself, while it’s written all over Brad Pitt’s face and his grungy beard that something is wearing at his core.

    After already pledging $1 million to help Haiti, the very busy actress/humanitarian found time to go where she’s desperately needed, flying down to the distraught country to cheer up some of the kids there (insert “meanwhile, Jennifer Aniston drinks for a cause” joke here).

    So how exactly was everything with Brad when she left?

    “Very up and down,” dishes our source close to the Jolie-Pitts.

    While our insider claims they are still together (for now), we’re told Brad and Angie’s abode hasn’t exactly been the most tension-free house on the Los Feliz block.

    “She has been very moody,” fesses Deep Brange. Uh, not exactly surprising.

    While Brad’s just been smelly as of late, we’re also told something else is slightly amiss, vibe-wise, with Brad and Ange. Pals who hang with the power couple admit that “you never know” what the feel and social ambience is going to be like when you’re with them.

    “Are you walking into happy household or tension-filled household?” one Brange insider continued. “You just never know.”

    As we’ve been hearing and telling forever, Brangelina is hardly Hollywood’s perfect pair. But clearly the pros (grotto sex, for starters) outweigh the cons, if they’re still making it work.

    We’re gonna keep typing this until we get arthritis in our fingers, though:

    Will someone please make Brad Pitt hot again?

    We know he’s all dark and damaged right now, but we’ll start to believe Brangelina’s together and happy a lot faster if they look good together while doing it.

    Reply
  143. penis enlargement said on April 8th, 2011 at 7:58 am

    Thanks alot for the info, helpful indeed. If I may, would I be able to use a quote or two on my website? vimax penis enlargement pills XR2011LAIN_AING

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Meta