<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IUC Exclusive:  IUC Goes Undercover At Super(should be called Testosterone)Bowl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/</link>
	<description>Pop Culture News and Views by Journalist Ian Halperin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:21:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: research paper</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56849</link>
		<dc:creator>research paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56849</guid>
		<description>Nice topic, you have here and it feeds more comment. Thanks for the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice topic, you have here and it feeds more comment. Thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56289</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56289</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-56277&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:&lt;/a&gt;
Hard to say, I agree exploiting the children is dispicable, but  I am betting the nannies pretty much raise the kids at this point.I do believe she loves her kids. One can only hope for the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-56277" rel="nofollow">@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:</a><br />
Hard to say, I agree exploiting the children is dispicable, but  I am betting the nannies pretty much raise the kids at this point.I do believe she loves her kids. One can only hope for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keane Cyber Queen Supreme</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56277</link>
		<dc:creator>Keane Cyber Queen Supreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56277</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-56275&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Kate:&lt;/a&gt;

Hm, have to say that I don&#039;t agree with you here.  I think that anyone who exploits her children for press, and even acquired them in the first place for that reason - well that and keeping her man - and farms them out to a massive army of nannies so she can have her fun with intoxicants and any living body she can get her hands, threatens suicide for attention and only thinks about herself, her image and he career while her children look forlorn, lost and desperate and call the paid staff &quot;mommy&quot;, is pretty much a lost cause in my book.  As I have said before, the damage has already been done to those children and even if she turned around and became the world&#039;s best mother tomorrow she could not undo what she has done to them I&#039;m afraid to say.  And let&#039;s face it, this turnaround is never going to happen.  After all, look how Jolie has treated her own parents.  Her children stand no chance.  Well, the best chance they have is that their father steps up to the plate and makes up for the serious failures of the person he chose to bring them into the world with.  It is his responsibility to do this, there are no excuses for not doing it, but I am afraid to say he does not seem to have done this so far and doesn&#039;t seem to have any intention of doing so.  I&#039;m sorry but I really can&#039;t see how he has time to make any more films when he really needs to be being both mother and father to six young children.  He knows this and he knows how much those children are suffering and yet he is still not doing it.  And I think it is his guilt over this which is one of the major things that is destroying him.  Angelina has no conscience and no feelings, I&#039;m sure she doesn&#039;t understand what she is doing to those kids and even if she did, she wouldn&#039;t care.  Sociopathic.  Brad on the other hand does know, and he is not sacrificing his career and personal life for the six lives which he should be putting before his own, he is still trying to be &quot;Movie Star Brad Pitt&quot;.  He knows it, his family know it, and I think it will tear him and them apart in the end.  I personally could not live with the guilt of what I was doing to those children if I were him and I think he won&#039;t be able to either.  JMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-56275" rel="nofollow">@Kate:</a></p>
<p>Hm, have to say that I don&#8217;t agree with you here.  I think that anyone who exploits her children for press, and even acquired them in the first place for that reason &#8211; well that and keeping her man &#8211; and farms them out to a massive army of nannies so she can have her fun with intoxicants and any living body she can get her hands, threatens suicide for attention and only thinks about herself, her image and he career while her children look forlorn, lost and desperate and call the paid staff &#8220;mommy&#8221;, is pretty much a lost cause in my book.  As I have said before, the damage has already been done to those children and even if she turned around and became the world&#8217;s best mother tomorrow she could not undo what she has done to them I&#8217;m afraid to say.  And let&#8217;s face it, this turnaround is never going to happen.  After all, look how Jolie has treated her own parents.  Her children stand no chance.  Well, the best chance they have is that their father steps up to the plate and makes up for the serious failures of the person he chose to bring them into the world with.  It is his responsibility to do this, there are no excuses for not doing it, but I am afraid to say he does not seem to have done this so far and doesn&#8217;t seem to have any intention of doing so.  I&#8217;m sorry but I really can&#8217;t see how he has time to make any more films when he really needs to be being both mother and father to six young children.  He knows this and he knows how much those children are suffering and yet he is still not doing it.  And I think it is his guilt over this which is one of the major things that is destroying him.  Angelina has no conscience and no feelings, I&#8217;m sure she doesn&#8217;t understand what she is doing to those kids and even if she did, she wouldn&#8217;t care.  Sociopathic.  Brad on the other hand does know, and he is not sacrificing his career and personal life for the six lives which he should be putting before his own, he is still trying to be &#8220;Movie Star Brad Pitt&#8221;.  He knows it, his family know it, and I think it will tear him and them apart in the end.  I personally could not live with the guilt of what I was doing to those children if I were him and I think he won&#8217;t be able to either.  JMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56275</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56275</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-56242&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:&lt;/a&gt;
How would Ted know, bad decisions mothers make are made privately , in their head. Even so, drugs, suicide, that alone is enough to put her in the class as a bad mother. No one is saying she does not love her children. If AJ would stop adopting and put her energy into the six she has, stop the drugs, and get some help, that would speak volumes about her. I think she could be a great mother. I think she does have that capacity because I think she has huge compassion for children. I hope she hooks up with a man that is three times stronger than she, and forces her into rehab, and mental couseling. Best thing that could happen to her, find a older guy that is stable, a little more conservative and respected that has too much too loose, has everything to offer her in terms of what she wants for her image, and force her to walk the line. Those little tykes deserve that. Let&#039;s all hope Angelina does pull it together, for them. Her and Brad were just never good for each other. Maybe the next one will be a better fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-56242" rel="nofollow">@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:</a><br />
How would Ted know, bad decisions mothers make are made privately , in their head. Even so, drugs, suicide, that alone is enough to put her in the class as a bad mother. No one is saying she does not love her children. If AJ would stop adopting and put her energy into the six she has, stop the drugs, and get some help, that would speak volumes about her. I think she could be a great mother. I think she does have that capacity because I think she has huge compassion for children. I hope she hooks up with a man that is three times stronger than she, and forces her into rehab, and mental couseling. Best thing that could happen to her, find a older guy that is stable, a little more conservative and respected that has too much too loose, has everything to offer her in terms of what she wants for her image, and force her to walk the line. Those little tykes deserve that. Let&#8217;s all hope Angelina does pull it together, for them. Her and Brad were just never good for each other. Maybe the next one will be a better fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56274</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56274</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-56230&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Tamara:&lt;/a&gt;
LOL, always the divine defender he he. Someone has to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-56230" rel="nofollow">@Tamara:</a><br />
LOL, always the divine defender he he. Someone has to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'm on the bidet</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56250</link>
		<dc:creator>I'm on the bidet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56250</guid>
		<description>CNN has a story that backs up Ian&#039;s point that the sex industry is descending on Miami - and in the most unfortunate of ways:

Volunteers try to help young sex workers on Super Bowl weekend
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/06/florida.superbowl.sex.trafficking/index.html?hpt=C1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN has a story that backs up Ian&#8217;s point that the sex industry is descending on Miami &#8211; and in the most unfortunate of ways:</p>
<p>Volunteers try to help young sex workers on Super Bowl weekend<br />
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/06/florida.superbowl.sex.trafficking/index.html?hpt=C1" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/06/florida.superbowl.sex.trafficking/index.html?hpt=C1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keane Cyber Queen Supreme</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56242</link>
		<dc:creator>Keane Cyber Queen Supreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56242</guid>
		<description>Ted b eing increasingly candid about Angelina - can&#039;t she afford those pay cheques any more?!

Dear Ted:
I woke up this morning from a terrible nightmare in which Angelina Jolie was a mastermind bent on destroying me. I think that I ought to turn it into a movie script. I think she&#039;d be the perfect villain. Thoughts?
—X 

Dear Dream Weaver:
Sounds like a case of art imitating life.

Although this one was a bit of a cop-out:

Dear Ted:
Is Angelina Jolie our generation&#039;s Joan Crawford? Ever since her post-Billy Bob Thornton days, I&#039;ve gotten that whole Mommie Dearest vibe. Or would you say Reese Witherspoon is more of a Joan Crawford type?
—CJ

Dear No More Wire Hangers:
I wouldn&#039;t count on Pax or Zahara to dish the dirt on Angie in a barn-burning tell-all (although I&#039;m sure there&#039;s plenty of dirt to dish). A.J. and R.W. may make some bad decisions, but most of those are with men and not as mommies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted b eing increasingly candid about Angelina &#8211; can&#8217;t she afford those pay cheques any more?!</p>
<p>Dear Ted:<br />
I woke up this morning from a terrible nightmare in which Angelina Jolie was a mastermind bent on destroying me. I think that I ought to turn it into a movie script. I think she&#8217;d be the perfect villain. Thoughts?<br />
—X </p>
<p>Dear Dream Weaver:<br />
Sounds like a case of art imitating life.</p>
<p>Although this one was a bit of a cop-out:</p>
<p>Dear Ted:<br />
Is Angelina Jolie our generation&#8217;s Joan Crawford? Ever since her post-Billy Bob Thornton days, I&#8217;ve gotten that whole Mommie Dearest vibe. Or would you say Reese Witherspoon is more of a Joan Crawford type?<br />
—CJ</p>
<p>Dear No More Wire Hangers:<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t count on Pax or Zahara to dish the dirt on Angie in a barn-burning tell-all (although I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s plenty of dirt to dish). A.J. and R.W. may make some bad decisions, but most of those are with men and not as mommies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: section9</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56233</link>
		<dc:creator>section9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56233</guid>
		<description>Yes, but now to the important news: are Gaga and Angelina there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but now to the important news: are Gaga and Angelina there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamara</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56230</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56230</guid>
		<description>Awwwwww Ian - thanks so much for putting that little disclaimer up for us &quot;In-shock Superposters!!  I was really confused about what you were doing but Kate assured us it was for research and that made sense to me, it&#039;s just that I thought you weren&#039;t writing another book (isn&#039;t that what you told us) so i didn&#039;t grasp what you were up to!  So relieved now, thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awwwwww Ian &#8211; thanks so much for putting that little disclaimer up for us &#8220;In-shock Superposters!!  I was really confused about what you were doing but Kate assured us it was for research and that made sense to me, it&#8217;s just that I thought you weren&#8217;t writing another book (isn&#8217;t that what you told us) so i didn&#8217;t grasp what you were up to!  So relieved now, thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty</title>
		<link>http://ianundercover.com/2010/02/05/iuc-exclusive-iuc-goes-undercover-at-supershould-be-called-testosteronebowl/comment-page-1/#comment-56227</link>
		<dc:creator>marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianundercover.com/?p=4454#comment-56227</guid>
		<description>Any vowing? I was right...Ian is doing what he does best which is expose the twisted, corrupted or fake. In this case we probably won&#039;t know if the title fit but  &#039;Craiglist&#039; has &#039;some evil characters&#039; advertizing for certain and we must be careful if using this site as Ian stated above. BE AWARE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any vowing? I was right&#8230;Ian is doing what he does best which is expose the twisted, corrupted or fake. In this case we probably won&#8217;t know if the title fit but  &#8216;Craiglist&#8217; has &#8217;some evil characters&#8217; advertizing for certain and we must be careful if using this site as Ian stated above. BE AWARE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

