IUC Exclusive: IUC Goes Undercover At Super(should be called Testosterone)Bowl

Posted on February 5th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

lingerie-football1I’m in Miami for what should really be called the testosterone bowl. It seems thee world’s entire sex industry has descended on this city – hookers, pimps and dope dealers line the streets. I decided to pose undercover as a Swedish model willing to do anything to get a ticket to the big game on Sunday. I posted an ad on Craigslist and had over six hundred replies, including guarantees from current NFL players, prominent CEOs and an owner of an airline guaranteeing me great tickets in exchange for a sensual evening of Swedish delight.

Important Note: This was all done to expose the injustice and deceit that happens daily on Craigslist. IUC warns everyone to beware of this site – people have been kidnapped, killed and conned regularly off Craigslist. If you need a date go to a real dating site where you can do due diligence.

  1. ladybert62 said on February 5th, 2010 at 10:07 am

    Ah – you dont look Swedish! Did you respond to the replies to your ad? Will I be seeing you on America’s Most Wanted? Are you going to keep us updated on your “new life”? :D

    Reply
  2. ladybert62 said on February 5th, 2010 at 10:16 am

    Ian, Ian, Ian – I read the ad – even if I buy the “swedish’ (which I still say you are not even close to in looks), I still have a hard time with “Stunning” and “supermodel” – someone might sue you for misrepresentation! ha ha :D

    Reply
  3. Tamara said on February 5th, 2010 at 10:28 am

    Ummmm…….why??

    Reply
  4. Lizzy said on February 5th, 2010 at 10:40 am

    This is weird?

    Reply
  5. cuze said on February 5th, 2010 at 10:46 am

    Is this what you do for shits and giggles when you get bored, Ian? lol..lol.. What are you going to do now? Are you going to reply or what? Keep us informed. If you make it to the Super Bowel take a big ole sign with you and do a shout out to us when the camera pans the stadium. lol..lol

    Reply
  6. guest123 said on February 5th, 2010 at 10:51 am

    hmm people replying to a craigslist ad with sexual offers……Scandalous ..NOT- seriously THIS is news to anyone ?

    Reply
  7. lurkeyloo said on February 5th, 2010 at 11:15 am

    WTF? Why???

    Reply
  8. Tamara said on February 5th, 2010 at 11:30 am

    What is the point? Do you plan to do an expose on the Superbowl weekend, I mean, would anyone be surprised by a revelation that there are millions of crazy people in Miami trying to cash in on drugs, prostitutes, black market tickets to the game, whatever whatever, would this be a revelation to ANYONE?? Doesn’t that kind of activity kind of go with the territory? Isn’t it against the law to post a bogus ad on Craigslist? I seem to recall something about a male prostitute soliciting on Cragis list who then murdered his victims and I thought CL now has to comply with certain internet advertising laws……why would they let you post as someone offering a night of delight? It doesnt make sense, and I can’t figure out what your point is.

    Reply
  9. Tinkuy said on February 5th, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    ooooooh, you’re soooooo edgy

    zzzzzzzzz

    Reply
  10. Liz E. said on February 5th, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    Ian, this was not a good idea.

    Reply
  11. Liz E. said on February 5th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    Ian, this wasn’t a good idea. You should be more careful.

    Repost of earlier post.

    Reply
  12. Liz E. said on February 5th, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    Excuse the double post above. Didn’t think it went through.

    Reply
  13. bluiznsmilez said on February 5th, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    I see what your doing. You’re trooling for celebrities. Meaning, skimming through the replies to see if you get a bite of someone famous that will be down there. Do tell when you can. Unfortunately, you didn’t specify your sex. You should’ve posted two. One specifying male, the other specifying female. But since you posted it on this website, now all your replies will know it’s you. Shoulda held on to the info till it was over and you got the goods.

    Reply
  14. I'm on the bidet said on February 5th, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    Ian, the reply to your Craiglist ad from “I’m on the bidet” isn’t from me, its from some other person named “I’m on the bidet”. A completely different person on a completely different bidet. I promise.

    Reply
  15. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 5th, 2010 at 7:22 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    You are too funny! Ha ha ha. I was gonna say, how does Ian know these are the real players/agents/whatevers? The responders are probably as fake as his ad was. Methinks the lure of a “swedish supermodel” would make a lot of people say pretty much anything to get her/him to respond…

    Reply
  16. Vittoria said on February 5th, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    You’re right and Ian please be careful! If they think a Swedish Supermodel is coming and you show up, you might just get your ass kicked. These are footballers after all. Please take care.

    Reply
  17. Kate said on February 6th, 2010 at 12:07 am

    This is a tool that IAN has used in the past for research, he used it for another book, and got a huge response also, it was for research, he of course did not follow through with it , it was purely for informational purposes. He talks about this in some of his past books.

    Reply
  18. Liz E. said on February 6th, 2010 at 1:07 am

    Solicitation is still an offense. It doesn’t matter if you don’t follow through with it and it doesn’t matter what the purposes are. Careful. If it involves interstate activity – traveling across state lines, using the internet, etc. – it can become a federal offense. Soliciting in and of itself is an illicit act.

    Reply
  19. Kate said on February 6th, 2010 at 1:41 am

    @ladybert62:
    Hi ladyberth, I don’t think IAN was going to meet with anyone, he uses this technique when he is researching a new project. He did this several times with other books. In the end he reveals that (or has in the past) and explains his objective for the experiment,Judging from some of the recent topics we have seen and where he has been I am going to guess he is working on his new book that he told us about awhile back. He records the responses and some of that information influences the direction he goes with the subject, and sometimes changes it altogether. Now I am very curious as to what this next book is going to cover, and thinking it will not be one person. Just some thoughts on this. How are you?

    Reply
  20. Kate said on February 6th, 2010 at 1:43 am

    @Liz E.:
    I am sure IAN is well aware of the law, he has a team of lawyers that are well versed and all passed the bar.

    Reply
  21. Kate said on February 6th, 2010 at 1:46 am

    @Kate:
    don’t mean that to sound snotty , my apologies, just saying he is bright and knows what he can do and can not do. half the stuff Borat does are illegal too, he is not in jail. Disclosure.

    Reply
  22. marty said on February 6th, 2010 at 8:22 am

    Maybe Ian want the whole world to know the injustice this service is still doing to the public and nothing have been done as in ‘writing a book’. Good luck, Ian.

    Reply
  23. Tamara said on February 6th, 2010 at 9:08 am

    @Kate:
    I thought Ian said he wasn’t going to write another book…didn’t he say that in his last video chat??

    Reply
  24. marty said on February 6th, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    Any vowing? I was right…Ian is doing what he does best which is expose the twisted, corrupted or fake. In this case we probably won’t know if the title fit but ‘Craiglist’ has ’some evil characters’ advertizing for certain and we must be careful if using this site as Ian stated above. BE AWARE!

    Reply
  25. Tamara said on February 6th, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    Awwwwww Ian – thanks so much for putting that little disclaimer up for us “In-shock Superposters!! I was really confused about what you were doing but Kate assured us it was for research and that made sense to me, it’s just that I thought you weren’t writing another book (isn’t that what you told us) so i didn’t grasp what you were up to! So relieved now, thanks!!

    Reply
  26. section9 said on February 6th, 2010 at 3:22 pm

    Yes, but now to the important news: are Gaga and Angelina there?

    Reply
  27. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 6th, 2010 at 6:46 pm

    Ted b eing increasingly candid about Angelina – can’t she afford those pay cheques any more?!

    Dear Ted:
    I woke up this morning from a terrible nightmare in which Angelina Jolie was a mastermind bent on destroying me. I think that I ought to turn it into a movie script. I think she’d be the perfect villain. Thoughts?
    —X

    Dear Dream Weaver:
    Sounds like a case of art imitating life.

    Although this one was a bit of a cop-out:

    Dear Ted:
    Is Angelina Jolie our generation’s Joan Crawford? Ever since her post-Billy Bob Thornton days, I’ve gotten that whole Mommie Dearest vibe. Or would you say Reese Witherspoon is more of a Joan Crawford type?
    —CJ

    Dear No More Wire Hangers:
    I wouldn’t count on Pax or Zahara to dish the dirt on Angie in a barn-burning tell-all (although I’m sure there’s plenty of dirt to dish). A.J. and R.W. may make some bad decisions, but most of those are with men and not as mommies.

    Reply
  28. I'm on the bidet said on February 6th, 2010 at 10:03 pm

    CNN has a story that backs up Ian’s point that the sex industry is descending on Miami – and in the most unfortunate of ways:

    Volunteers try to help young sex workers on Super Bowl weekend
    http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/06/florida.superbowl.sex.trafficking/index.html?hpt=C1

    Reply
  29. Kate said on February 7th, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    @Tamara:
    LOL, always the divine defender he he. Someone has to do it.

    Reply
  30. Kate said on February 7th, 2010 at 2:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    How would Ted know, bad decisions mothers make are made privately , in their head. Even so, drugs, suicide, that alone is enough to put her in the class as a bad mother. No one is saying she does not love her children. If AJ would stop adopting and put her energy into the six she has, stop the drugs, and get some help, that would speak volumes about her. I think she could be a great mother. I think she does have that capacity because I think she has huge compassion for children. I hope she hooks up with a man that is three times stronger than she, and forces her into rehab, and mental couseling. Best thing that could happen to her, find a older guy that is stable, a little more conservative and respected that has too much too loose, has everything to offer her in terms of what she wants for her image, and force her to walk the line. Those little tykes deserve that. Let’s all hope Angelina does pull it together, for them. Her and Brad were just never good for each other. Maybe the next one will be a better fit.

    Reply
  31. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 7th, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    @Kate:

    Hm, have to say that I don’t agree with you here. I think that anyone who exploits her children for press, and even acquired them in the first place for that reason – well that and keeping her man – and farms them out to a massive army of nannies so she can have her fun with intoxicants and any living body she can get her hands, threatens suicide for attention and only thinks about herself, her image and he career while her children look forlorn, lost and desperate and call the paid staff “mommy”, is pretty much a lost cause in my book. As I have said before, the damage has already been done to those children and even if she turned around and became the world’s best mother tomorrow she could not undo what she has done to them I’m afraid to say. And let’s face it, this turnaround is never going to happen. After all, look how Jolie has treated her own parents. Her children stand no chance. Well, the best chance they have is that their father steps up to the plate and makes up for the serious failures of the person he chose to bring them into the world with. It is his responsibility to do this, there are no excuses for not doing it, but I am afraid to say he does not seem to have done this so far and doesn’t seem to have any intention of doing so. I’m sorry but I really can’t see how he has time to make any more films when he really needs to be being both mother and father to six young children. He knows this and he knows how much those children are suffering and yet he is still not doing it. And I think it is his guilt over this which is one of the major things that is destroying him. Angelina has no conscience and no feelings, I’m sure she doesn’t understand what she is doing to those kids and even if she did, she wouldn’t care. Sociopathic. Brad on the other hand does know, and he is not sacrificing his career and personal life for the six lives which he should be putting before his own, he is still trying to be “Movie Star Brad Pitt”. He knows it, his family know it, and I think it will tear him and them apart in the end. I personally could not live with the guilt of what I was doing to those children if I were him and I think he won’t be able to either. JMO

    Reply
  32. Kate said on February 7th, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Hard to say, I agree exploiting the children is dispicable, but I am betting the nannies pretty much raise the kids at this point.I do believe she loves her kids. One can only hope for the best.

    Reply
  33. research paper said on February 15th, 2010 at 11:36 am

    Nice topic, you have here and it feeds more comment. Thanks for the post!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Meta