IUC Exclusive: Ex Jolie Lover Threatens to sue IUC

Posted on February 4th, 2010 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

angelina-jolie-08A woman who claims she had a love affair with Angie Jolie is trying to get IUC to “cease and desist from continuing to spread a hate campaign about the world’s most noble woman. If you don’t I’ll sue you for every penny you have”. In a long email to IUC, the woman who calls herself Nicole said IUC should “focus on the positive concerning Angie and not the salacious information you have so falsely spread during the past year. I read your book and can’t believe you didn’t mention how valuable an ambassador Angelina is not only to the U.S. but to the entire universe.” The woman added she is still in touch with Jolie and sees her several times a month. IUC responded by saying “we won’t back down baby. Truth shall always prevail.”

  1. Lizzy said on February 4th, 2010 at 9:59 am

    Just curious, why can’t Ian post any of the e-mails that he’s gotten in re: stories about AJ… if he blacks out names, etc. can he be sued? I just thought if someone sent you information you could share it. Just a question – i don’t know the logistics of things like this!

    Reply
  2. joanne said on February 4th, 2010 at 10:06 am

    As an american I am ashamed she represents my Country. IMO I feel the UN prettied up a piece of Hollyweird trash (wears blood, cuts self, brags about trysts, buys kids, etc.) and photo oped the whole mess for money that went somewhere. She would have to prove Jolie is noble. If you want to be saintly you don’t hide secrets. You don’t promote peace then yap about guns and knives. You don’t brag about your amazing sex life and how many lovers you had. I had many lovers and I am considered a whore and she is considered noble? She is an example of how crooked we are in America.

    Reply
  3. Emerson said on February 4th, 2010 at 10:25 am

    PALEEZE “Nicole” give me a break?? OH I forgot, we should honor and respect those people who a. are on drugs, b. sleep with their brothers, and c. brings 6 innocent children into their already F***** up life? Anything Angelina has done is for her own “purposes” and I wish more people would wake up and smell the coffee?? I didn’t even mention all her other vices…good grief, the list is endless…lesbian lovers, buying her children knives, cutting herself, wait, my hand is too tired to go on……go away Niciole! Please stop perpetuating Angelina’s delusion that she is a do-gooder!!! No one is fooled…

    Reply
  4. I'm on the bidet said on February 4th, 2010 at 10:39 am

    Well, at least she bought the book.

    Reply
  5. lory said on February 4th, 2010 at 10:46 am

    If she sues you for your insane stories on your homepage you are in deep s.hit Ian! While you may have sticked to already known facts in your book – coming right out of Jolie`s mouth – the same cannot be said for your website.

    By the way truth is not just anything that a random person tells you and that you want to believe because it supports your own negative view of a person.

    Reply
  6. v said on February 4th, 2010 at 11:09 am

    If Jolie was so saintly, this woman would have never wrote to Ian. I mean, if she doesn’t have anything to hide, no secrets, what is her ‘friend’ so concerned about? The truth is getting ready to come out and that bitch is shaking in her boots. Karma is a bitch, Jolie. And, now I am really starting to believe Brad will come out on top. Angie has turned a lot of people off in HW and that is where the real power players are. Her direct and indirect attacks at Jen over the yrs are going to come back and bite her in her bony ass. That comment she made about not being able to wait until her children can watch the movie where their parents fell in love left a bad taste in everybody’s mouth.

    Reply
  7. Emerson said on February 4th, 2010 at 11:20 am

    @v i couldn’t have said it better myself, and no one can get sued for telling the truth! THAT’S why she is starting to get worried, Saint Angelina isn’t much of a Saint…

    Reply
  8. Vittoria said on February 4th, 2010 at 11:33 am

    @Emerson:
    Sure she is! She is the patron saint of skanks, dopers and the mentally ill.

    Reply
  9. Kate said on February 4th, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    This person sounds as deluded as the one who use to post here last year saying she was Brads long lost love and Jolie did some horrible thing to her and she had a court case against her and she has been through the most unimaginable pain because of what Brad has been through with Jolie. She claimed that she thought he was going to come back to her, and didn’t. You guys remember that? I think some fans can develop some very serious issues. This Nicole person sounds like a delusional fan, not a mature ex lover with a ax to grind. The “entire universe” lmao, okay Angie, knock it off you are embarrassing yourself. Nicole is a nice name though.lol IAN, you sure this is a real person , not Angie baby or a delusional whacko like that me/well person last year?

    jmho :)

    Reply
  10. BlueSkies said on February 4th, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    It amazes me that anyone (besides James Haven) is willing to go to bat for Jolie. Even her current and ex lovers must have a clue that their sex partner is a scumbag. Noble? LMAO – thanks for my first real laugh of the day, “Nicole”. That skank is the farthest thing from the word “noble” that I can think of.

    Reply
  11. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on February 4th, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    I too got a great laugh from the “most noble woman in the world” and “an ambassador not only for the world but the universe” – ROTFLMAO!!!!! (Perfect point to use this acronym). Ian, please could you explain to Nicole that being an ambassador for the universe is technically impossible as there is nothing outside the universe for her to be representing it to. Unless of course “Nicole” is suggesting she is somehow an Ambassador on behalf of the universe to God? Now that would be an assertion! I think poor Angie really has lost it now!

    Oh and I love how her complaint isn’t that any of the information you have posted about Angie is wrong, just that it is “salacious” and you have “falsely spread it” – an entirely different thing than saying the information is false obvs – and that we should “focus on the positive”. So it’s ok to be a major drug addict with illegal sexual procliviities who neglects her very vulnerable six children and wages hate campaigns on people who threaten her (Jen) as long as she throws a bit of money at a charity now and again right? Erm, wrong. Oh and by the way, isn’t it ironic that poor Angie’s friends are so up in arms about IUC’s supposed “hate campaign” against Ange after the woman herself has spent so many years waging a campaign of hate in the worldwide media against the entirely innocent woman whose husband she stole? Yes, I really think it is. Karma’s a bitch ain’t it Ange and friends? I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: people who are well-known bastards and bullies in the industry I worked in have all come a very public cropper eventually and got theirs back in spades. And you know how many friends of said individuals were rushing to their defence when this was all kicking off? Yes none, exactly, because they didn’t have any. Good luck Angelina and your supposed ex-lover who you apparently see almost every week (sounds serious), you will need it!

    Reply
  12. B said on February 4th, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    More like “Nicole” is angry she didn’t get any time in the book. “Noble” my ass! That’s an insult to people I know and love who wouldn’t DREAM of doing the things this tramp does. I’m glad she looks terrible and that people are talking about how terrible she is. She did terrible things and somehow earned a big name for herself. The best thing we can do, people, is refuse to see any of her stupid films. After all, WE provide her with the money that makes her a snob.

    Reply
  13. Emerson said on February 4th, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    @vittora I forgot that Saint!!! Yes, it would fit Angie perfectly too!! @B, ya know, I don’t think I’ve ever seen one of her movies, so I’m in the clear! ;)

    Reply
  14. chris from france said on February 4th, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    you can’t say that, because she actually is a predator ambassador that came from the other side of the universe to show us how harmless they are…

    Reply
  15. alif said on February 4th, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    The label, “saint” is used freely and erroniously. It’s like trying to sanctify someone like Castro. That would shock people. But it’s used for AJ over and over and over; so that it’s not only the loonies who are starting to believe it.

    But not we, who know about the “Hitlerian Lie”! (For those of you who haven’t heard about it, it’s the repetition of a lie; told over and over again, until the initially skeptic turns into a believer.)

    And furthermore: A saint is one who is free of the stain of sin at the time of death. It’s someone who lives a life of heroic virtue. There is a long list of virtues.
    If a person has lived a life of sin; then repents until the stains are removed, that person is a saint.
    If a person gives up his life, in martyrdom, for the faith; that person is a saint.
    One doesn’t have to be a Roman Catholic to become a saint.
    There are other examples. Information is readily available, if one wants to know how to become a saint.
    Obviously, that is not what we here, are after at this moment in time.
    But we don’t encourage others to call us “saints”.

    Reply
  16. ancient chinese secret said on February 4th, 2010 at 5:27 pm

    Who is this “Nicole”? and what are these threats she speaks about? A.J. a noble woman?

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    hmm, oh, what Nicole I’m sorry, did you say something?

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Reply
  17. Vittoria said on February 4th, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    @alif:
    There isn’t enough OxyClean in the world to get her stains out! I guess the better hangup the Saint title. oh well.

    Reply
  18. v said on February 4th, 2010 at 8:24 pm

    I’m glad you aren’t backing down, Ian. You had me worried for a minute.

    Reply
  19. BlueSkies said on February 4th, 2010 at 9:07 pm

    @joanne:

    I agree, as an American it is indeed an embarrassment to have Jolie represent my country to the UN. A crazy, skeletal ho, give me a break. The UN should have turned her down.

    Reply
  20. Vittoria said on February 4th, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    @BlueSkies:
    Seriously. It is more than a little embarrassing!!!

    Reply
  21. Vittoria said on February 4th, 2010 at 10:30 pm

    @Vittoria:
    Kind of like the 8 years of the Cheney Bunch. Yes our criminals are here to represent us in the world. How lovely.,

    Reply
  22. alif said on February 5th, 2010 at 2:43 am

    Other sites continually label Angelina Jolie, a saint.
    While this makes her fanatic followers quite happy; it is dangerous and damaging.
    People aren’t schooled regarding what makes a saint. They only know that to call a person a saint means that the person is not like we, sinners. They are above us!
    They actually believe that; and it is extremely dangerous! It could well lead to others being callled saintly, but who are anything but!
    Eventually, a dictator will most probably arise, who is looked upon as benevolent and saintly. In reality, however, the dictator may be demonic.
    And this is why Brangie is so dangerous. It’s the loonies, and those without religious training who have no clue as to who and what they are supporting and idolizing.

    Of course all this was prophesied by holy people of various backgrounds and countries. People who didn’t know of each other, but who dedicated their lives to being “saintly”.
    It’s all there in the library for anyone to research.

    Reply
  23. guest123 said on February 5th, 2010 at 10:56 am

    @Vittoria:
    hey Americans got Jolie…Canadians have Ian…..i’d rather Jolie

    Reply
  24. Pattyanne said on February 5th, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    Change the word nobel to notorious would be a much more accurate description of Jolie. I too am sick to death of the whitewashing of Mz Jolie’s personality. She Is What She Is = psychotic manipulative sexual perverted biotch. Nuff said.

    Reply
  25. Aleisha said on February 6th, 2010 at 3:29 am

    And you know the Female First forum is totally down – someone has hacked it and brought it down, because lately there are so many stories anti-Ange real bad….. the white washing of Ange’s image is being disproved. there are sooooooo many people posting the latest tabloid pictures (from all around the world) which are showing Ange in a very bad light and her people are obviously not liking it…. so hacked the forum becomes…. I was in the middle of posting a message when the site went down and then a few minutes later, got the “We are down for essential scheduled maintenance, while we ugrapde our servers. Please check back in about an hour” message way over an hour ago….

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/

    Thats the main page – I cant get to the forum as the whole site is down. I work in IT and thats the stock standard message that sites put up when their site has has a POS (point of service) attack on their servers from a cyber criminal to bring the site down….

    Interesting huh?

    You better be careful Ian – they may do the same thing here if you start posting images from the tabloids which show Jolie in a really bad way…. just saying, thats all….

    Reply
  26. Aleisha said on February 6th, 2010 at 5:40 am

    I meant denial of service…. doh!!

    Reply
  27. keane cyber queen supreme said on February 6th, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Hey Aleisha, this happened to IUC several times at the beginning of last year when Ian started to publish the truth about Ange. Angelina and her people think they can control the internet. They are sadly mistaken. The web has democratised the way information is spread in the media and is a powerful force in preventing politicians and now celebrities too from completely controlling the information that is put out about themselves. You can buy the media but you can’t buy the people! Long live the internet!

    Reply
  28. Yorkshire Gal said on February 6th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    I have just been reading Grazia (British magazine) and it seems that the AJ camp V BP camp PR war has begun, with Grazia being pro-Brad. It mentions the tell -all books and an undisclosed source says although Angie-Jo is livid about them, Brad isn’t bothered about the revalations. “As far as he’s concerned no book could come close to accurately portraying the hellish existence he’s had to endure at times during their relationship” said a friend and colleague “He’s no saint, but in comparison to Angelina, Brad is the most straightforward guy you could ever meet.” It goes on to say “he’s a traditional Mid-Western boy of lmited education who was no match for Angelina when she decided she wanted him. He was happy with Jen before she came along…ask anyone who really knows him and they’ll tell you he’s been badly damaged by these past five years. ” Ha ha ha poor old “dumb” Brad! Didn’t he do journalism at college and drop out just before he graduated? I hardly consider that limited. What I don’t understand slightly OT is, why they don’t just announce it to the press if they have broken up? Surely they look worse by not just coming clean? It doesn’t make sense to me, that Brad would go along with this charade any longer, if he definitely want’s out, I don’t believe he is the type of person to put others feelings first (ie the kids). She must have some real dirt on him. Just my opinion!
    Ps love this blog, have been lurking for ages.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Meta