IUC Exclusive: 18 Days To Go…

Posted on November 12th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Congrats to my good friend Francois Turgeon for another great cover. brangiebookcover

  1. Tamara said on November 12th, 2009 at 9:25 am

    …And the race is on…..

    Reply
  2. cuze said on November 12th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Ian, any chance we could get a sneak peek at a page or two? LOL..

    Reply
  3. sid said on November 12th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    Whatever the book claims, i don’t think they’re breaking up anytime soon folks! People (and trash mags) have been sayin that for the last 5 years and they still seem to be happy together. And so is Aniston, i believe.
    There is no triangle… just tabloid crap!

    Reply
  4. Kate said on November 12th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    I like the cover, lol, they used an old photo and a recent one of her. Looks like the title changed to: Brangelina:The Untold Story of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. Is that what is says, so no more Brangelina Exposed. Did the publisher not like that one? I thought that was a great title.

    Reply
  5. Astro said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @sid:

    You’re right….When the book comes out, It will be noise for two or three weeks after that nothing will happen. Brangie will remain together.

    Aniston is having and enjoying the life what she wants…More and more gorgeous every day. But people has to do money…you know!!

    Reply
  6. Kate said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @Astro:
    You are forgetting that book tours keep it going, and so do the tabloids, and so does the internet. Then there are the various countries , where they are not popular. You believe because you adore them that they are loved worldwide, that is not so. Some people love Brad and hate her, and that will come into play. Ian’s interviews will also contribute. He was still doing MJ interviews 5 months after the book was released. I have to respectfully disagree Astro, this is not going away in 2-3 weeks, it will linger on, and then it will be Andrew Morton’s turn. When big stars lie, they fall. That is why their publicist tell them to get it out there in the beginning, don’t let someone else out you first. Brad was stupid to not admit his affair, that alone is going to make him look like just what he is ..a liar. He sat right there on Larry King live when he questioned him and said, “no Larry, that came after, that came after”..then Angelina for whatever reason (maybe she was pissed at him) came along and disputed that, and made it clear they were doing the boogie long before. Even then, when he was questioned as late as Dec 2008, he lied again. Do you honestly believe that people are just going to give him a free pass on that. Even if Jen knew, that is not the point. He lied to his public. He forced his wife to deal with it. For that many will not understand. I suspect IAN will have more compassion in the end for Angelina that him, and all of you that are getting in a tizzy, are doing so for nothing. He is not the big bad wolf trying to much down on little Red Riding Hood. He normally tries to save the poor little thing. If you had read his past books you would know that. If he deflects from that this time, I will be surprised. He is always fair to his main character, and that is the Dumbed Down White Trash Ho of this story. sorry, just what I think. She may have built herself up, but she did it using others.

    jmho

    Reply
  7. Kate said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @Astro:
    Sorry for the typos, wanted to add, them splitting is not the issue, I don’t quite understand why you keep harping on that, all of them do eventually. They could hang in for the next 10 years for the kids and that literally means nothing in a town where half of the relationships were set up.

    Reply
  8. Pattyanne said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Perfect cover Ian~! It visually tells the story inside. Looking forward to receiving my copy Dec. 3rd from Amazon.com.

    Reply
  9. jan/sa said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    nice cover but false as peewe does not look that now. he should be shown as he is today and not 4 years ago. jmo

    Reply
  10. HisHighness said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    I love you all…I will try to post some excerpts soon. Have to get permission from my publisher.

    Reply
  11. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    Love it! Does this mean bitch-face gets to go on the front cover alone?! I jest, I jest, I’m sure she’s lovely in person. Ahem.

    Reply
  12. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Woo hoo Ian! Looks like your book is causing a major rumpus in the formerly Angelina-controlled territory known as the tabloid press! Nice work. We all give you a hearty round of applause and a rousing chorus of hip hip hoorays! Lol

    Reply
  13. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    And please can I just give a huge shout out to Life & Style magazine who have been the first mag to finally call a spade a spade! What I think is happening now is they all know this story is about to come out and they are all trying to scoop Ian. They all know what she’s really like they’ve just been afraid to kill the golden goose. Now someone’s taken the plunge and is going for the jugular (many congratulations for that Ian), they are all afraid of being left behind. Watch them all fight over being the first to break this story, see who can get it out first. As I’ve always said, journos are loyal to the story, never to any particular individual. It’s about what sells. So good luck Angelina and Brad over the coming months is what I say, you will need it. And in the spirit of all good essays, I would like to end on a quote:

    “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive”

    Hey Brad and Ange? NEVER a truer word said.

    Reply
  14. mooki said on November 12th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1227077/Is-Angelina-Jolie-set-adopt-baby-no7-Actress-heading-Syria-daughter-Brad-Pitt-isnt-keen.html

    the media’s already reporting on baby #7 (from Syria) for Brangie.

    also, Geena Davis has really let herself go, weight-wise:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1227305/Geena-Davis-shows-new-mumsy-figure-takes-children-park.html

    Reply
  15. Togi said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I “heart” you Keane! LOL

    Reply
  16. Pattyanne said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    I am in total agreement with you on this. It’s a lie to present a photo of the old, pre-Jolie Brad while Jolie is shown as she now is. @jan/sa:

    Reply
  17. Pattyanne said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    Thank You So Much~! Looking forward to reading a few teasers. Wink!!@HisHighness:

    Reply
  18. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Togi:

    Togi, I always knew you were the woman for me. Either you or that hot piece of ass of a husband of yours! Lol

    Reply
  19. Togi said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa haaa! You’re so stinking funny Amiga!

    @Patty – I also think it’s funny as heck that an OLD picture of Brad is being used. Why, oh why, wasn’t that picture of him dressed in all black and the knit stocking cap on his head picture used???? With the beard??? That’s the Brad of today, I’m afraid. BOoo hoooo. I miss the pretty Brad. ;-)

    Reply
  20. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @Togi:

    Well, I try! Lol Re: Brad’s beard, it has occurred to me that he is trying to disguise himself as another person so the whole world will forget he is actually the entity formerly known as Brad Pitt, and as one half of the epic fail that is Brangelina. It’s like: “hey I have a beard now and am dressing in black so you can’t see me now right, right? I’m not here really, that Brad Pitt guy, he was someone else, don’t even know him. Nope, moving on, hey look over there at that, and over there. See you didn’t even see me, I’ve disappeared.” You know, like kids do when they cover their eyes? This is definitely what is going on!

    Reply
  21. Pattyanne said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    Ahhhhhhh….the Brad that once was. Angie should be held for murder charges for killing his looks. But Wait! Brad is responsible for doing that all by himself! He now looks to me to be a reincarnation of Maynard Krebbs….the “beatnick” from the old Dobby Gillis tv show. Rock on Bradley….lol@Togi:

    Reply
  22. Pattyanne said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Also, as a second thought, Brad has little going for him these days doesn’t he? His boyish good looks are way long gone, his I.Q. is questionable at best, his sex appeal is so low that one would have to tie a partner to a bed for him to practice the bulls eye with his teeny weenie, Oh wait! He and Jolie do that and call it…..having sex. LOL@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  23. too curious said on November 12th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Great cover Ian! Am looking forward to reading the book.

    Reply
  24. Ms Agatha said on November 12th, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    Ian :

    Perfect layout …. separation is a visible …headline runner is divider screen between two people … one shown in the past .. (pitty) .. the other one in her present glory ( AJ)… nothing in common…bodies leaning away from each other…. this cover screams : SPLIT !!!!!!! DONE !!! OVER!!!

    Reply
  25. Ms Agatha said on November 12th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    I think Ian, you’ve done Brad a huge favor with the book … this tsunami may set him free ….. you know, dumb people deserve a disaster to give them a second chance LOL … you know, the more intriguing (and conniving) player always loses …. read your Shakespeare … bye Angie

    Reply
  26. Alif said on November 12th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    I hope it sells gazillions!
    However, if I was browsing in a book store, (which I do, esp. during the holidays) it wouldn’t catch my eye, as is! jmo!

    Reply
  27. cuze said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:30 pm

    I just pre ordered my copy. Can’t wait. I like the picture.

    Reply
  28. Astro said on November 12th, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    HAHAHA…Come Ian: All of your cause is to show that Brad Pitt is a LIAR????….OK!!!!JFK was a liar, Joseph kennedy was a Lair!!.Billy Kennedy was a liar..Ted K was a lair… Sean Penn is a liar!!!…Kevin Costner is a liar…Dennis Quaid is a Liar!!!.

    Reply
  29. Kate said on November 12th, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    I like the the layout too, very fitting.

    Reply
  30. Tamara said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:50 am

    Right, Ian is that the official book cover then?

    Reply
  31. Tamara said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:56 am

    Well I just answered my own question, that is the cover shown on Amazon,, and I have just pre-ordered my book, so December 3rd or 4th delivery WHOOO HOOOOOOO!!

    Reply
  32. mooki said on November 13th, 2009 at 10:30 am

    any word on the Cruises split? Katie’s been looking haggard…

    found this BI:
    http://blindgossip.com/?p=14060

    Reply
  33. ladybert62 said on November 13th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    @mooki:
    HI mooki – thanks for sharing that article. I read it. My vote goes to Will Smith and not Tom Cruise. Have a good day. :D

    Reply
  34. Pattyanne said on November 13th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Star magazines direct quotes from Ian’s book:

    “Now Halperin is ripping the lid off Brad and Angie’s tightly guarded life. A major focus of his shocking narrative is the constant – and often violent – fighting behind closed doors. Angelina’s “personal lifestyle choices are…causing serious and potentially irreparable tensions” with Brad, he writes of their “stormy and unstable relationship.” Indeed Brad constantly rips into Angie for her birdlike eating habits and her superstrict parenting style, according to sources. He’s also frustrtated with her nonstop work schedule. But Angie snaps at the smallest criticism. “She is so stubborn. She’ll tell him, “I’m doing things my way. Get over it”, a source tells Star. “She is tough.” And she doesn’t mind getting physical to make that point!! “She throws things at him.” “Once, she even shattered an expensive vase against the wall!!”

    But the most painful fights, sources say, are those that center around Brad’s ex JENNIFER ANISTON, another player in Halperin’s book. “Angelina will say things like, “As if you’d be happier with Jen, ” says a source. “Orr, “you’re just as miserable as Jen.” But Brad turns it back around on Angelina in a twisted mind game,”He’ll say, “Jen would never act like you.”

    should be a very interesting read. Looking forward to December 3rd!

    Reply
  35. Reaction said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Exclusive: Angelina Jolie Spread “Mean-Spirited” Rumors About Jen Aniston
    Friday – November 13, 2009 – 12:03pm

    Comments (26) »
    Is Angie the worst Mean Girl of them all — and is Brad’s ex-wife Jen her most-wounded victim?

    Brangelina: The Untold Story of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie reports that Angelina Jolie, 34, waged “a mean-spirited but effective campaign” against Jennifer Aniston around the time that Brad Pitt divorced her to be with Jolie.

    Angelina vs. Megan Fox: compare them here

    The new Us Weekly (on newsstands now) has the exclusive first look at what’s really inside the shocking new tell-all — and reveals the truth behind some of the alleged bombshells.

    See how the Jolie-Pitt kids have grown

    Author Ian Halperin asserts in his book that Jolie and her camp (including her manager Geyer Kosinski and brother James Haven) planted press stories in 2005 that painted Aniston in a negative light. Specifically? That Aniston firmly prioritized her career over starting a family — which put her directly at odds with Pitt, who ached for kids.

    Jolie, Halperin writes, “was convinced that this is the story that would resonate with all these women who saw her as a man-stealing bitch.”

    Think you know Angelina Jolie’s bra size? Find out in our slideshow

    For more on Jolie, Pitt and Aniston – including the truth behind Jolie and Pitt’s supposed infidelity, their absentee parenting, and Jolie’s “warning” to lookalike Megan Fox – pick up the new issue of Us Weekly today!

    Reply
  36. Kate said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @HisHighness:
    That would be very exciting, we would love a little peek! Thanks IAN!

    Reply
  37. Kate said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Patti, I don’t think that is from his book, that is Star saying that is what they think is in the book. IAN said he never spoke to them and the book was not finished yet. Or did I misunderstand that? I think Star just gathered all that information from reading back here on the blog..is that naive ..lol

    Reply
  38. mooki said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/11/13/katie-holmes-morning-mocha/

    Katie Holmes looking worse for wear.

    Reply
  39. Kate said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Aggie, the pic does Brad a favor, but I wonder if the reason he is working so hard right now to nail down a new director for Moneyball is because of the book. The beard seems to mimic Col Percy Fawcett , yet he is going fast and furious with meetings with these two new directors Marc Webb and Bennett Miller ,who both want in on this film, and it is ready to go. He could be filming about the time the book hits. Otherwise he has to find another way to deflect. More trips to the grocery store, Toys R US, Date outs, those are not good, all the paps will be screaming questions at him. At least on location or filming he is locked away and protected. lol

    Reply
  40. guest1 said on November 13th, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    @Reaction:

    Jolie spread rumors that Jen favoured her career over kids? That`s nonsense! It was actually Jen`s ACTONS had CREATED the rumors both on the internet and in tabloids! Fact is Jen said she wanted to start a family – but instead she signed up for several movies in the spring of 2004! Rumor Has It and Derailed were both filmed in 2004, while The Break Up was filmed in the spring of 2005 and let to a romence between Jen and Vince BEFORE they were officially divorced in August 2005.

    Reply
  41. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 13th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @guest1:

    So how does that equate with the fact that Angelina keeps promising to give up making films or take a year off but never does do you think Mia – any parallels?

    BTW I hear you have your own blog and comment a lot on other sites under the name kamia or mia. Apparently you are all over the web trashing Jen and preaching the gospel according to St. Jolie. Mia, you never did tell me what you did for a living. Care to share? Just wondering how any one person could possibly have the time to do all this. Or are you still a teenager living at home with mom? I know you said that English wasn’t your first language so care to share what neck of the woods you are from? I am genuinely interested. I feel like we’re practically family nowadays! Lol

    Reply
  42. guest1 said on November 13th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    No I don`t have my own blog and I have no idea who kamia is! Are you starting to halluzinate Keane? Should I worry for you? By the way thax but I have a 40 hours/per week job which leaves me plenty of free time!

    Reply
  43. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 13th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    @guest1:

    Ok ok mia chillax – I was only asking! Lol (Just FYI hallucinate is spelt with a c not a z – do not bitch at me BTW I am just trying to improve your English, call it charity work!). I am not being mean I was just genuinely interested in who you are, what age you are roughly, where you’re from and what you do for a living, can’t you share with the group? You are such a committed loon, I give you props for that, but I am just concerned that you are also a bit of a lonely one. Tell me, do you have any loon friends? I am honestly genuinely interested!

    Reply
  44. DebFrmHell said on November 13th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @guest1:
    Nice CCP from your post at FF. To tired from all the surfing between sites to come up with something different or are you just playing two-handed open tab! LOL!
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/angelina-jolie-spread-mean-spirited-rumors-jen-t240577.html
    at the 1:47pm mark. In case you forgot. 8-)

    Reply
  45. Kate said on November 13th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    They are being to panic it seems, amazing how they do not see the irony in how she keeps saying she will take a year off. Brad has two films lined up, she has two lined up after his or overlapping, thank goodness for nannies.

    They keep saying this is nonsense as though someone made it up, forgetting that this is being quoted by someone who knows Angelina. lol ! glad you brought that !

    ha ! it never ends does it , these next few weeks should be hectic! Keep your head down dear. :)

    Reply
  46. Kate said on November 13th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Keane, that was for you, keep your head down! lol but that was funny, your wit never ceases!

    Reply
  47. Pattyanne said on November 13th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    You are right Kate, they didn’t say they interviewed Ian, but said, “After an exhaustive investigation journalist Ian Haleprin is set to tear down the flawless facade Brad and Angie have so carefully constructed. “They have successfully manipulated the public into believing a glamorous fairy tale that bears little resemblance to the reality of the pair’s life together, according to the author of Brangelina Exposed, due out Dec 3.”@Kate:

    Reply
  48. Pattyanne said on November 13th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    Jenny Shimizu, 42, started calling her (Angie) a lot after Angie’s mom died. “There’s always been an animal attraction between them.” But she may not be the only one of Angie’s undercover lover’s brought to light in Halperin’s book. Angelina has another lady on the side near their chateau in France!! No one knows much about her, but she’s around Angelina’s age and is an artist,” says the source, “They see each other whenever Angelina is in town.”

    Rumors abound~! Hey Angeeeeeeee, the end is near.

    Reply
  49. Pattyanne said on November 13th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Kate, Keane, i have decided that after the break up is official, and Brangeliniston is over and done with, we should start a Mia Fanclub. Her tenacity and hard work on the behalf of Angie Jo deserves some recognition. Goodness knows the pay can’t be all that much. Rock on Mia. Everyone should have a cause close to their heart.

    Reply
  50. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    @Kate:

    What were you referring to? My mia love? Lol. I’m genuinely a bit concerned about her. She is always hanging out with us antis, doesn’t she have any loon friends to play with? I just feel like she is like the weird girl at school who hangs out with the kids who tease her because she doesn’t have any other option. Just a little bit of human kindness there!

    Reply
  51. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I forgot to say it is of course not difficult to be funny when I have mia as a fall guy. She sets them up, I knock them out – easy work if you can get it! Lol

    Reply
  52. guest1 said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Your arrogance and cynism is one of a kind keane! I give you that! Makes me worry for you! Where did all that bitterness come from? Maybe caused by that girl whom you love and who keeps ignoring you? And by the way you didn`t manage to put down ANY of my arguments yet! But keep trying!

    Reply
  53. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @guest1:

    Ah mia, why so nasty? I was just teasing honey, no need to be so vicious! No bitterness here, just humour. Sorry but you are an easy target my friend! And thanks for the reminder but no I am over that girl now and on to the next one. How about you though hon, care to share? Chicks, dudes, vibrating objects, what does it for you? And BTW what did you mean by I didn’t manage to put down any of your arguments – what arguments?! Lol

    Reply
  54. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    Helloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Are you leaving me with only mia to talk to now? This is a sad state of affairs!

    Reply
  55. mooki said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    remember how we were talking about how Angie doesn’t have a publicist or PR people. well, I think mia is one of them.

    btw: I think I’ve found some celebs lurking on the WWP (Why We Protest/Anonymous) and ESMB. They’re posting under an assumed name of course.

    Reply
  56. Pattyanne said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    LOL, sorry Keane, i’m very busy reading all the latest gossip on every magazine, and most all gossip sites about Angelina’s foul plan to snag Brad Pitt and ruin Jennifer Aniston’s reputation. No wonder she employs a manager such as Geyer The Liar Kosimski.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  57. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @mooki:

    Even Angelina is not that stupid surely?! My God can you imagine if she was relying on mia to counter all the negative press that’s going to hit her – it would be certain death!

    Reply
  58. mooki said on November 13th, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    @mooki:

    in regards to the Ex Scientologist Message Boards, here’s user “Iknowtoomuch” from a post yesterday @ around 8:11 AM under the headline ‘Looks Like I’ll Be Coming Out Sooner Than I Thought’:
    “My wife has made the decision to break it off. She doesn’t want someone who is negative about Scientology and continues to pursue it.

    I’ve alreay broken down a few times over this whole mess but a wall has been reached and this time I really think it’s over.
    She’s going to be looking for a new place soon and I’ve got to get some work done and sell all my equipment so I can find my own place.

    Of course I’m the one breaking up the marriage because I refuse to let “it” (Scientology) go. But let’s just ignore that it was the reason for many of my families problems and the fact I was set so far back in life because of it. Getting a real life going that is. She just wont allow me to heal from all this crap. And frankly she’s supressing me trying to get better and having my own opinion. I can’t even do it anymore.

    I’m sure as soon as she’s back with her Scientology friends and I go public they will do what they can to take my daughter from me. So I want all the filings and divorce to be finalized before I let loose with my story and get out to do some protesting.

    Just an update. I guess I need to just get it over with and get on with a real life. I’ll miss her badly.

    All I can hope for is that the cult falls soon and she sees that what they were doing is all wrong.”

    Reply
  59. mooki said on November 13th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    oops here the link to the above post
    http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=14597

    Reply
  60. Pattyanne said on November 13th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    John?@mooki:

    Reply
  61. Ms Agatha said on November 13th, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    @Kate:

    If Pitty thinks the jungle is a place where it is easy to get lost ….so wrong… and if he thinks , he can play hide and seek with the papz in the Amazon ….ahhh so wrong again.. every papz who can hold a camera will be heading out to the Amazon Jungle and lurk behind every tree there to get a good shot of him ..haha.. and should Jen join him out in the wilderness….. OMG…. can you imagine the Tarzan&Jane like photos we will see all over the magz ??? Beautiful ! All what’s left for AJ is to pick up her bones and retreat into the sunset…lol

    Reply
  62. Ms Agatha said on November 13th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Love you right back ! You are lightning it up like a Christmas Tree !

    Reply
  63. benjaminbutton14 said on November 13th, 2009 at 11:26 pm

    bb14. I ordered the Brangelina book back in October from a bookseller, but have been notified that estimated time of arrival of the book in Australia will be 28th December 09
    What a bummer I will be the last to read it.

    Reply
  64. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 1:06 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Yes Mia my love continuous entertainment in a sweet way and fun, lol

    Reply
  65. guest1 said on November 14th, 2009 at 4:37 am

    Referring to the new Life & Style Weekly article her is my opinion!

    Ah too bad that the Life & Style story is incorrect! Fact is that Jolie has ADMITTED to having nannies! She just said that noone stays over night.When the twins were born she said that they may have to change that! By the way show me a hollywood couple that has no nanny! I doubt you will find one – especially when BOTH parents work – as do millions of other parents around the world!

    Jolie said that she will do less movies – maybe one movie a year! She never said that she will quit immediately – I mean for Christ`s sake she is 34 years! Who stops working at 34? If I was her I would make movies as long as the salary is high enough to support her lifestyle! Anyone would!

    Fact is also that other families like Matt Damon and his wife and kids move aroud too whenever he does a new movie. And so does Kate and Suri who follow Tom Cruise and vice versa! Sme actors are just less in the tabloids but that does NOT change the fact that they employ nannies and move around!!!

    Fact is that 50% of all marriages end in divorce – and in most cases because one or both spouses cheat! I never understood why everyone screams murder when it comes to Brangelina but couldn`t care less when another actor couple cheats and splits or even when this happens to their own neighbours!

    By the way show me a couple were BOTH parents work that has more freetime than Brangelina who work maybe 6 months in a year! Anyone else can just dream about having that much freetime and time for your kids!

    Reply
  66. mooki said on November 14th, 2009 at 6:42 am

    @Pattyanne:

    sure sounds like it

    Reply
  67. keane cyber queen supreme said on November 14th, 2009 at 6:52 am

    Wow mia, so many exclamation marks, my head can’t take it on a saturday morning! I think I’m gonna have to take another couple of ibuprofen! Lol And with regards to your erm, “arguments”, for one I don’t think the issue is whether Angelina has nannies or not, it’s how many she has, the fact that they provide 24hr care for the children and that they rarely see their parents apart from at scheduled photo opps that’s the problem. This is quite well known in the media now, the poor kids are going to grow up thinking the paid staff are their family, not Brangelina. The other issue you mentioned about the fact that she keeps saying she’ll take a year off or leave HW for good, well the problem is not how many months of the year she is or isn’t working, it is simply that she is lying. Angelina’s people have advised her to keep saying it to explain why she keeps on working when she has just had/bought more children. Unfortunately though her people are quite stupid as when Angelina keeps saying one thing but doing another, the world does notice! It’s the lying and the hypocrisy that’s the problem, not that she employs nannies or works less than the average parent. When you say one thing to get good press and do the exact opposite it makes you look something of a fraud doesn’t it?

    Reply
  68. too curious said on November 14th, 2009 at 9:08 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    Keane, you nailed it!

    Mia, it is the lying, hypocrisy and (alleged) illegal activities that are the concern. We all know they have nannies, so its stupid to pretend to be full time, hands-on parents. I have no problem with people who employ nannies for their kids, just why lie about it? Oh yeah, to make one look like a better person/parent than they are…

    Reply
  69. pickwick said on November 14th, 2009 at 9:15 am

    @mooki:
    I think there is some kind of passive-aggressive thing going on with Katie Holmes. He’s a control freak–I read he has his sister supervise her and her shopping—and the way she gets back at him is by not trying to hide how miserable he makes her life. What’s he going to do? Hold her down and put makeup on her? When she isn’t in town with him and shows up somewhere, she tends to look great. When he’s around, she’s looks pale and drawn.

    Reply
  70. pickwick said on November 14th, 2009 at 9:21 am

    @too curious:
    that’s the truth. I don’t really care much about what is going on in their relationship (except when they tell big obvious lies or do things like that insensitive “W” photoshoot) but I do take issue with the way they seem to circumvent the laws of other countries by flashing some money around. And I really suspect they come out way ahead with the public perception of their charity work vs. what they would be spending on travel and housing if they didn’t have that tax write off.

    Reply
  71. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 14th, 2009 at 11:38 am

    @pickwick:

    I just don’t get it, why doesn’t she just quit that bitch then? It’s ridiculous. Flipping hell I highly doubt that they even have a child together to be perfectly honest. What is she doing it for? If it’s a contract she can’t get out of without losing a load of cash why did she even get into it in the first place? Surely she knew she would be selling her soul? Why play along with it if she’s miserable? Unless she’s scared of what might come out? I honestly just don’t get that situation from start to finish. She seemed like a normal girl from a normal – conservative actually – background, what the hell is she doing with her life? This is one showmance that I will NEVER understand!

    Reply
  72. mooki said on November 14th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    @Pattyanne:

    I’m not sure if it is him, but epic if it is

    Reply
  73. pickwick said on November 14th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Me, neither!! I don’t understand why she got sucked into that vortex of crazy. But I can guess why she stays. I think he would take the kid. And she would be lucky to have any access at all with his access to lawyers and the Scientology people behind him.

    Maybe she just got caught up in the excitement of being the famous guy’s girlfriend and traveling the globe for the movie he was doing and the whole Paris romance thing. Maybe she thought he was okay.

    I read that when she came to a tv show called “The View”, some employees said that he had her followed into the bathroom and they were creeped out. He wouldn’t let her out of sight of him or his sister.

    I don’t know what she will do. It would be awful to know that your kid would surely be spirited away if you made a noise. Or you would have to live with him. It must be dreadful. At first, she sort of lost herself in shopping and ran up huge bills in New York City. Now I don’t think he is allowing her to do that anymore. I read that she walks the grounds all the time by herself. It’s like an old Victorian novel. “Woman in White” or something like that.

    Reply
  74. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 14th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @pickwick:

    Bizarre isn’t it? I basically think she is on a five year contract and just got with him to elevate her career. I have a feeling Suri isn’t his and he may have been a cover for why the good Catholic girl got knocked up out of wedlock. Ian met her and said she was one of the most phony people he had ever met which is strange because she always came across as Little Miss Apple Pie and very young and naive for her years. I don’t really understand though why if she was in it for the fame she has been dressing in such a dowdy way for the past year or so – maybe she is rebelling against the facade she was supposed to create? Who knows, these people are absolutely nuts IMO!

    Reply
  75. Pattyanne said on November 14th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    Could be the first crack. I’ll be watching. I really like him as a person, based on what little time i’ve spent talking with him. He’s a gentle man, so well mannered, and funny.@mooki:

    Reply
  76. TruthTeller said on November 14th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    This is my first time posting here… I have long been blowing up the truth about AJ/BP over at Ted’s Awful Truth and have delightedly exploded some heads back in the days when people were still heavily under the drug-like sway from these two thoroughly duplicitous individuals. I live and work in Hollywood, and also have worked at UN. I always knew AJ was a giant symbol of something much bigger than herself and in all the most horrid of ways: She truly symbolizes how our entire culture is entranced and transfixed with the picture of a life, the image, instead of *the truth*. (ahem, Mia. It is rather evident you are Missing In Action from your own life, indeed. Feel free to spaz out at this–but I am an author who has freely helped thousands of people just like you. I know the signs well.) Hence the bottom line is that this entrenched denial and numbness combined with questing for all the most vapid things, is very much why an entire generation of kids are self-destructing = and this is the reason I have given my life and sacrificed everything to help them + our overall glaringly obvious societal implosion, be helped off the cliff at this most critical time. AJ/BP’s (or Nadya Suleman or Gosselin’s etc) children are deeply indicative of an entire generation: children are not pawns, accessories, or possessions. When people have children to satiate their own agenda, it is always diastrous. And that is why children are currently drowning in themselves in record numbers. As well as mass shootings every other day… people are very far gone because the blind have been leading the blind in a myriad of ways in our culture.

    However, my primary reason for posting here is to say KEANE I HEART YOU. Your wit is scathingly, lovingly, joyously fantastic. Way to nail it every dang time. Brava. I honor and celebrate that you exist. Thank you for bringing me such sunshine as I work for the world.

    And lastly, YAY IAN FOR HAVING THE COURAGE TO DO WHAT EVERYONE ELSE HAS BEEN AFRAID TO. BLESS YOU. You are eternally the Helen Thomas of the entertainment world. Speak it, baby. Am with you every step and you are 100% on it. Be relentless. My greatest hope is that your book begins a tidal wave of truth-emergence and eyes opening about many different public figures in the entertainment industry who are guilty of the same madness/deceptiveness. AJ has just done it better than anyone else thus far. You are doing a tremendous amount of good by exposing a very diseased structure.

    Reply
  77. Capri said on November 14th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    Vaguely remember reading a few years ago that it was speculated that Katie wasn’t first choice. More like sixth down line. He couldn’t get ScarJo or Natalie Portman and kept going down lower from a list til Katie said yes.

    Reply
  78. Alif said on November 14th, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    Odd, that in a “free” country, a famous person is virtually held captive.
    If she wasn’t famous, she’d be rescued by now.

    A human being has needs; and the greatest, is the need to be loved!
    She isn’t getting that.
    She’s a prisoner of her own persona, as well as the cult of scientology. jmo!

    Reply
  79. Tamara said on November 14th, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    @Alif:
    Hiya Alif! I think she’s a prisoner of her contract…she is breaking free now, her contract is almost up and that ’s why all the mags are talking about the break up. I even saw one mag, forgot who, that talks about the contract on the cover! She is probably wondering whether or not to renew for another five years, depends really on what she gets out of it…but I also heard somewhere that she will have to have another child if she renews, of course that means a LOT more money, but I don’t think she will be allowed to take the child(ren) with her when the contract is up, so she really is up a creek!!

    Reply
  80. Ms Agatha said on November 14th, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    I don’t want to know who leaves messages on Ian’s agent’s mail box right now …hahahaha

    Reply
  81. Ms Agatha said on November 14th, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    Maybe that’s subject for another book LOL@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  82. Alif said on November 15th, 2009 at 1:14 am

    @Tamara:
    Thanks!
    Crossing my fingers that she’s not thoroughly brainwashed by now!

    Reply
  83. Alif said on November 15th, 2009 at 3:10 am

    Off topic:

    What many of us have dreaded, is now for real. Lindsay Lohan looks like a haggard, old woman.
    Seems like her dad is playing games with his sick, sick daughter.

    And many of us have been praying for her, and will still. Just sad, is all.

    Reply
  84. jan/sa said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:11 am

    alif yes lindsay needs lots of people to pray for her as i feel that so many people in hw like pee brain all think they are bigger and better than god . i feel for her and katie as i think they think without fame they are nothing. as for truth teller please tell us more of your preceptions and what you really think of the two morons the brand. i hope ians book is all it promises and does not end up trying to make jen the villian and pee boy and jolie the good guys altough i think jen is happier and better off without this nonpersonality manny and if she wanted out of the marriage then ian must state that i for one would accept it as i think she is to classy and does not like all this paps in her bussiness. she always seemed to want to keep her life private and only promote for the movies she made. jmo

    Reply
  85. mooki said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:12 am

    @Alif:

    sad fact is, Dina is speaking for Lindsay, acting her PR person and enabler. I think Dina is the one messing things up.

    Reply
  86. mooki said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:12 am

    @Alif:

    sad fact is, Dina is speaking for Lindsay, acting her PR person and enabler. I think Dina is the one messing things up.

    Reply
  87. mooki said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:13 am

    oops sorry for double post

    Reply
  88. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 9:42 am

    Happy in Los Angeles
    Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie: MOCA Mates

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2357812/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-moca-mates-03/

    Reply
  89. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 15th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @Astro:

    Wow – they look like two wax works! Angelina is standing with her chin in the air to make sure she doesn’t get any sagging in the neck region in her pics and Brad looks beyond thrilled to be standing next to the mother of his six children! And they stay about a foot apart from each other at all times! How in love they look! Guess there just happened to be a photographer standing around taking shots of all the celebs looking at the art works too huh? So, where are the pics of everyone else I wonder…

    Reply
  90. JinxieGal said on November 15th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    Her chin implant looks worse the older and thinner she gets

    Reply
  91. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 15th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    @Astro:

    I also love how Angelina is trying to do her “see I’m nice really, honest guv” face as usual. It always makes me laugh because it looks like she is having to work so hard to achieve it! Bitch-face/smug-face on the other hand seem to be effortless, she has them down pat. Can’t think why!

    Reply
  92. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Bravo~!@TruthTeller:

    Reply
  93. benjaminbutton14 said on November 15th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    bb14. After looking at those photos I was wondering what colour she would wear if the colour black had not been invented.

    Reply
  94. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    With that inflated ego of her’s she would have invented black i’m sure. Wink!@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  95. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Go on Date to Art Museum….Too Gorgeuos!!!

    http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-go-on-date-at-art-museum-20091511

    Reply
  96. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 15th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @Astro:

    Seriously that is the funniest set of Brangelina publicity photos I have ever seen in my life! Not only can Angelina not look convincingly concerned for some of the world’s most troubled people, she also cannot effectively portray a person who gives a shit about art either! Honestly, this woman is just hilarious. She can’t even act in photos, let alone moving pictures! Who the hell is setting this nonsense up? If it’s the svengali known as Geyer the Liar, all I can say is: “Note to GTL, next time you dream up an idea for a photo shoot to promote your top product (Ange), try not to pitch it so high. Angelina can convincingly act the following: hot sexy bitch, earth mother (she isn’t, but she does fake it reasonably well) and wild child druggie drop-out. Angelina cannot convincingly act the following: anything that requires thought, emotion or feeling for anyone but herself. Stick to that and in future photo opps she may look ever so slightly less ridiculous.

    Reply
  97. pickwick said on November 15th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    I had to come over to see what you all thought of the new Brad and Angie art museum photos.
    To my eyes, they are basically telling everyone it’s over. Looks almost like they’ve given up trying. The whole Cannes thing felt very forced. I thought AJ was really trying, though. Looked like she was trying to hold up her end of the bargain. He looked bored and aloof. Guess she decided that if he wasn’t going to bother acting like he liked her, she wasn’t going to play the game anymore either.
    This just seems like an announcement: “Ian’s book is coming out. Then Morton’s. The game is over and we can barely stand next to each other.”
    Anyone who can’t see that body language and understand it just have some weird reasons to want to keep believing in the relationship of two Hollywood celebrities in 2009.
    I think that’s why I even end up paying attention to these two. It’s just so strange that people fixate on them as though they are religious figures. They’re just people. Bad people, good people, troubled people, sad people, whatever. This is one of the few places I can come to see people who understand that these are just two very wealthy, overindulged human beings. Brad is a decent actor who has done some good films and appears to have a sincere interest in architecture as a hobby. Angelina—bad actress, (sorry) in bad, violent films. I really wonder if her interest in the UN stuff is …sincere?

    Reply
  98. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    For all you Mannheim Steamroller fans here, he is also known as Chip Davis, who is Jonathan Vincent Voight’s brother. Jon Voights other brother is a professor of Geology at Penn State College, and quite renown in his field.

    Reply
  99. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    Oops, take that back, Chip TAYLOR is Voight’s brother. @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  100. pickwick said on November 15th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Jon Voigt has two chins and they are both pink. Greasy. Gross. Blech.
    I liked Midnight Cowboy, but it turns out that the character might not have been too far from the guy playing him. Big, dumb, self-centered, obtuse.

    Reply
  101. pickwick said on November 15th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    Has everyone already ordered their book from amazon? I need to order mine this week. I know I’m shallow, but I’m really curious to see what Ian dug up.

    Reply
  102. pickwick said on November 15th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    Which celebrities do you guys particularly dislike?
    I don’t like Voigt (obviously), any reality show idiot, Axl Rose (supposed to be a real jerk), Kanye West (supposed to be a jerk), Kevin Spacey (for getting that waiter fired), Gwenyth Paltrow and her trainer and her Goopy website, and…..let’s see……Tom Cruise (mostly for all the unnecessary gay remarks he apparently makes and his death grip on everyone around him—it’s creepy)
    I like Diane Keaton, Jack Nicholson (yes, he is full of himself but he seems to have a lot of fun in life), Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, Steve Carrell, Judd Apatow, Paul Fieg.
    Most overrated would be Angelina.
    Two celebrities who need to be rescued—Lindsey Lohan and Katie Holmes. I felt sorry for LL until I read that she screamed and cried at a bar the other night because they asked her to pay for her bar bill and she said that she doesn’t ever have to pay for her drinks.
    Anyone else have any favorites, overrated, etc?

    Reply
  103. stinky-inky said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    Wow. Any body language experts out there? Things look a little tense to me. I found myself thinking “poor Brad Pitt” as I looked at the photos. Karma’s a bitch, isn’t it?

    Reply
  104. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    So true, when i looked at those photos it seemed to me to be a couple who could barely stand being so near to one another, let alone out as a couple. Angie looked higher than Georgia Pines, and Pitt looked like he was wearing high heel shoes with such thick lifts! Two such phony people trying to keep up the charade.@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  105. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    BTW Stinky-inky, noticed Angie kept her hand (s) in her pockets, what do you wanna bet she has a revolver in there? LOL@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  106. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    Merci Beaucoup and Asante Sana, Pattyanne. Yes, I too am rather surprised she hasn’t taken credit for the invention of the color black itself. And when you said Chip Davis, I was thinking for some reason of the pithy journalist Chip Reid (which I certainly knew couldn’t be related to Voight without more visible display of public fireworks), so many thanks for clarifying a la Taylor. And jen/sa, I will very much be doing so soon = drawing a cultural and socio-political connection to what their brand does represent, and the catastrophic implications it has on the kids of this generation (working on the project now–tis a doosie). And lastly of course, Keane: I implore you to please, keep that golden commentary rolling on like donkey kong because what you just wrote about those MOCA pics was almost better than Christmas. Perfection. Nearly hurt myself laughing and that is so unspeakably appreciated. To quote some Molly Ivins. “Think of something to make the ridiculous look ridiculous.” And me oh my, how you do.

    p.s. This board is so much fun!! What a delight to discover. Am so dang excited ‘tha brand’ is about to get oooouted in all their dastardly artifice. There is nothing more beautiful in all the world than the glorious, naked truth. @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  107. stinky-inky said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Ha! With those skinny, veiny arms, it doesn’t look like she’d have the strength to pull the trigger. Maybe she’s hiding her stash of whatever has her pupils dilated like she just had a retinal exam at her opthamologist. jmho

    Reply
  108. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    Everybody is talking about MOCA gorgeuos pictures:

    Brad & Angelina Get Seriously Arty in L.A.
    http://www.okmagazine.com/2009/11/brad-angelina-get-seriously-arty-in-la/

    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/11/brad-angie-all-hollywood-come-out-support-la-art-museum

    St. Angie And Billy Goat Brad Look At Art
    http://www.dlisted.com/node/34835

    Reply
  109. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    The vision of BP putting on his lifts = ROFL. +I am so dang sick of seeing every man in Hollywood wearing these…. heelarious. If only it were. But I suppose it is so completely fitting with the overall theme of ugly beauty and sparkly deception. They both, in those MOCA pics, personify the ‘ol “trying so very hard to look like I am not trying hard at all,” which is genuinely an epidemic in this city. But they are truly the Prom King and Queen of it all.

    And yes their body language is screaming the truth of what is really going on for anyone who has eyes to see. (Communication is 93% non-verbal.) Brilliant photos they are in demonstration of how much they are both coming undone in this ongoing facade.

    Reply
  110. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    Your humble opinion happens to coincide bullseye with the truth. I wrote above that I work in the center of this industry and I know for a fact that she is still using. Many people/execs inside this business know, because when she does films, she has to be insured, including medically, and her toxicology results, are predictably… toxic. How surprising. I hope this all blows sky high. She is the absolute furthest thing from a role model there is. @stinky-inky:

    Reply
  111. stinky-inky said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @TruthTeller:
    Could she be so whacked out that the Pollock looks like realism? Or maybe it’s speaking to her: “Syrian babies. Syrian babies.” jmho

    Reply
  112. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    Aww, thank you TT, and you enhance the board with your truth. @TruthTeller:

    Reply
  113. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    Oh baby, trust me when I say that Syria is the last place that would likely approve her adoption. Unless of course she paid them off obscenely or, slept with someone there. (I am third generation from Syria and Sudan mixed with Scot/Irish, but I grew up with alllll Syrians.) They take their ancestry seriously. Chances would be nill of her extracting a little girl. But then again, we are talking about a world class manipulator. And yes, I am sure she quite thinks she is living inside dear Jackson’s actual work. I defer to Keane’s analysis on the laughable nature of her attempt to experience art. She is the antithesis to anything sui generis. @stinky-inky:

    Reply
  114. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    I especially liked the photo of Angie standing before a huge print of vast debris. It makes a silent statement that she is aware the end is coming to swollow her into the darkness. She seen from the rear view, dressed in a long black gown, and the photo in black and white. Quite striking, very telling, and somehow sad.@TruthTeller:

    Reply
  115. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    Am blowing a kiss in your general dyeahreckshun. (my best effort at a Python inference/dialect, lol). You too slay me Pattyanne! SO so grateful for this. :> Am generally working my guts out helping people one at a time or working with a focus on the collective to get these new solutions out to our society asap (anyone realize that self-destruction is now THE #1 cause of death in this country!?!) Therefore, it is a grave and sobering task but hugely imperative in these times, and so finding this board is incredibly synonomous with lavender creme brulee to me. Glee. (dern that adjective now looks like a fox reference but I swear my use of that word long preceeded that show.) @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  116. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    BP’s body language closely matches that of Prince Charles , both men cohabitating with hags lol

    Reply
  117. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    This is the URL to the photo i am speaking of:

    http://dlisted.com/files/imagecache/photo-thumbnail/files/galleries/brangieart4.jpg

    Reply
  118. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    I completely concur. It is horrifyingly sad and the epitome of tragic. She is the picture of glamorous ruin. However, it remains extraordinarily important that she is not just torn down, but used as an illuminating narrative for our entire culture, which is what I am working night and day to do. @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  119. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    I wish you much luck with your mission. Many of us feel the same; she needs to be an example for the consequences of bad choices, so that our young people can see with their own eyes that money and celebrity do not give anyone a free pass to make their own rules of life. Too many emulate the celebs now with the whoring, drinking and driving, and the horrible deaths to drug overdoses. That is wrong, bad, unacceptable socially, and so painfully horrible way to end one’s life. I think each and every one of us knows someone who “had it all” and threw it away on drugs, or another form of addiction. It’s like watching a train wrech and having no voice to scream STOP.@TruthTeller:

    Reply
  120. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    Mostly, it’s the children we are so very concerned about. They appear to be safely in the hands of several well trained and experienced nannies, but that could change at any time or whim of Angie’s. @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  121. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    I know what you mean Aggie. I found it hard to understand how a man , any man, could prefer Camilla over Diana. But then i read that Charles prefers horses. Wheeee Heeee. LOL. Okay, so i’m bad.@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  122. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    Did you hear that infamous tape of Charles and Camilla cooing to one another with their idea of “love talk”? Oh my golly! I laughed so hard i peed myself at her “ohhhhh Chawwlesss” And when he told her he wanted to be where her Tampax was, well i barfed. Future King? Nahhhh. Future cockhold.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  123. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    ABSOLUTELY = this is the complete sum of why I work. These kids. ALL of them, hers and all of what I call the collateral damage of these public people in Hollywood and beyond. They reflect the much, much larger picture of what you eloquently just tied in: everyone around us. It is very much all connected. It is profoundly egregious that an entire generation, by the time they are 18, (and these are the official stats): 1 in 3 are addicted to something and 50% have a diagnosable (I say that loosely) psychiatric condition. It is a f*** national emergency. AJ is but the poster child for many things that lead off the cliff. @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  124. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    lol…if you look at both men’ s body language, it’s virtual the same.. and that’s very telling… BP is giving it all way …lol… he just can’t fake it the poor guy….. and AJ’s photo ( the one she looks at a mountain of garbage ) … reminds me of that of Diana sitting in front of tadsch mahal …. the intent was/is the same : Manipulation of the public lol

    Reply
  125. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    Angie really looks happy.

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2357812/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-moca-mates-03/

    Reply
  126. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    Well said, Ms. Agatha.@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  127. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    But Jenny HAPPY and SOSOSO Gorgeuos!!!…Look at this!!!

    Jennifer Aniston: Bikini Babe in Cabo San Lucas

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2358621/jennifer-aniston-sunbathing-cabo-01/

    Reply
  128. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    @Astro:

    “look happy” versus ” are happy ” … subtle difference not detected by the Fan Fiction Base

    Reply
  129. Bitch Please said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    @Astro:
    Just becase she is smiling, does not mean happiness. If so, what about ShitPitt, he has not smiled yet.

    Reply
  130. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    @Astro:
    Not only do we see a real woman with meat on her bones … she also wears BP hat ! Cute !

    Reply
  131. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    Yep, it was claimed that Diana posed for that photo in front of the Taj Mahal with the purpose in mind of informing that she was a solidary figure. No more mrs. nice lady to prince whats-his-name. It was obvious that Jolie was, in her mind, duplicating this statement with her pose. I honestly doubt Jolie knows a real emotion these days, her entire life the past five years has been fiction….only thing missing was the camera part of the time. @Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  132. Pattyanne said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:01 pm

    Love your avi Aggie, is it Pippi Longstockings?

    Reply
  133. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    Subtle difference and HUGE distinction. THANK YOU Ms A!!! And hallelujah for the point that is beautous for a woman to look like a woman, not a bag of bones!?! AJ has zero-anything sensual going on in her body. She would cut you with her ulna and radius colliding. And her lips and all of the attending hullabaloo about them is, if you think about it, a form of subtle racism; many people have gorgeous full lips like hers, however why the heck is she singled out?? Gee, I wonder why. Point being, many people don’t find her attractive at all, except all the women who idolize the image she represents (which is another giganto issue).

    Ultimately, she is an ice queen, aesthetically. @Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  134. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    Now ETonline…I am waiting for E!
    http://www.etonline.com/gallery/featured/2009/11/81012/index.html

    Reply
  135. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    YAY pippy longstockings!!! I do believe it is a ringer for her. Anyway, there is a damn role model. lol @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  136. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    lol….. a statement of her solitude…haha…. yeah we have seen it all before … lol….. next one Angie ! lol

    @Pattyanne:
    :) Pipi Longstocking …She frequently mocks and dupes adults she encounters, Pippi usually reserves her worst behavior for the most pompous and condescending of adults……. that is sooooo me hahaha

    Reply
  137. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    @TruthTeller:
    …the women who idolize her … that’s another MONSTER Giant issue…. so true…how to do cure idotique behavior ? Where does it actually come from? Who started it ? What idiot ever said that big Carp Fish lips are beautiful ???

    Reply
  138. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    Big Jolips …..a Frankenstein forehead … and an anorexic skeleton are the sexual idols of today … sorry , all you Astros … you need some mental flossing lol

    Reply
  139. stinky-inky said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:30 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    ITA–That photo reminded me of a Casper David Friedrich painting: always a solitary figure in the foreground with the ruins or a desolate landscape in background.

    Reply
  140. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    Oh, I am ALLLLLL over that (the idolatry), and all of its appendages everywhere across our culture. + The other and all of the permutations of racism in this “post-racial” era, (just interviewed the Director of Natnl Civil Rghts Institute).

    Let me say this, I got some shit that is some truth dynamite. :>>> freely email me truthtelleraflame@gmail.com and I will send you some goodies to read. p.s. I love the Pippi in you, as well as all the rest. Rock on taj Mahaler-caller-outer. :>> @Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  141. TruthTeller said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    And I got a bomb on that topic too, our ideation of beauty and the overall state of where modern women culturally reside = and the deleterious effects this clearly has on young girls growing up. And it is much different than the usual politically correct crap being bandied about (which changes nothing). @Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  142. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie left their six kids at home to hit the town for MOCA’s new 30th anniversary exhibit in L.A.

    Read more: http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2009/11/brad_pitt_angelina_jolie_art_date_night.php#ixzz0WyygJzLF

    Reply
  143. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:47 pm

    @TruthTeller:
    haha… we are on same page re pcc ( political correct crap) changing nothing…. I am a believer in direct and straight talk…. idolatry : Big big industry …. lots of money to be made …. cosmetics, fashion, magazines, TV, movies industry, the list goes on and on …. even if people like AJ fades away one day …. there will be many more after her… as long as women are manipulated in believing they are not up to par with a certain beauty standard ( which changes of course every 5 years) women will be easy targets

    Reply
  144. Real Talk said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    Let’s get real. These two are finished. Whether they front for the cameras or not, they are though. Brad finally got what he deserves. He left his wife for a women who wanted to have a family with him at the drop of a hat. Jen wanted to put the family thing on hold to do her movies. She said she wanted to give her career a change after Friends in an interview with Diane Sawyer. Pitt cried on Oprah about it and then got with Angie. Only to find out she wanted to collect kids and used them as pawns. She doesn’t see them as people. She is not going to give up her career for a family. She just adds kids between going to a movie set or a UN meeting.
    Notice you mostly see her adopted kids more than her biological kids. So we are reminded what a good person she is by caring for the forgotten colored children of the world. Recently you see her with Shiloh but there aren’t many baby pics of her. She likes to walk around hold their hands and go to The Gap , Toys R Us, or some other store for the regular folks. Or she is in People Magazine fighting for refugees (like if you really cared about refugees you would be in People and not a political mag?) WTF?
    Brad will continue the charade to keep from looking like an idiot/douche who left his wife for this bitch. She probably uses the children as a way to keep him since she couldn’t keep a man herself until she had/bought kids. Of course Brad could use her drug use against her (high at Cannes 09 and at this art museum gala) but he is known (and been photograph) drunk and admitted to smoking illegal substances himself.
    I hope they continue to tear each other down and be the laughing stock of HW. Soon it will spread to the world. Maybe the kids can be cared for by Brad’s parents cause these too need help and are unfit.

    Of course all of the above in my opinion.

    Reply
  145. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    @Astro:
    Astro chill lol nobody cares :)

    Reply
  146. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    Brad support Angelina!
    Jolie, 34, cut ties with her father in 2001 after Voight used the media to beg Jolie to get help for her “serious mental problems.” She legally dropped her father’s last name in 2002.

    A family friend tells the magazine that the actress “met face-to-face” with her father in February with encouragement from Brad Pitt — and has been in contact with him ever since

    Read more: http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2009/11/jon_voight_reconciles_with_angelina_jolie.php?adid=jon_voight_reconciles_with_angelina_jolie_sphere_extratv#ixzz0Wz0WAwHa

    Reply
  147. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    OK here It is….

    VICIOUS tabloids got you down? Not Brangelina! The superstars put their best face forward at a Saturday night gala in Los Angeles.

    http://www.eonline.com/photos/gallery.jsp?galleryUUID=6#50308

    Reply
  148. Ms Agatha said on November 15th, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    OK. This person who gets paid by the AJ team by lines posted here…. the one who wears the astro-pants …we understand you got to get food on the table and have your car payments to take care of….. I see, you have no choice but posting this crap here…. so go ahead , I feel your dilemma , it’s a desperate economic situation….will jump right over your posts , sayonara lol

    Reply
  149. LeAnn said on November 15th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    Poor Astro…..he/she is trying hard! We feel your pain brutha. Just let it go man, just let it go!

    Reply
  150. Astro said on November 15th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    Come on Pipi….Pipi:

    Don’t breathe on the wound!!!

    Reply
  151. video said on November 16th, 2009 at 4:03 am

    http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/93069498

    video of brad and angelina moca

    Reply
  152. RealityCheck said on November 16th, 2009 at 4:32 am

    Even if they never split (Whoever splits with six kids in the picture?), the truth must out! There was too much damage and suffering caused to Jennifer Aniston for nothing, just because she happened to be married to this guy! I believe the same damage would be caused to any woman who would be married to him if anyone like Angelina came along – it’s so obvious she wanted him not because she loved him but because he was her only train to total makeover! Without him, no-one would take her seriously – she would remain a f****** nobody branded with a bizarre reputation for life.

    Reply
  153. mooki said on November 16th, 2009 at 6:34 am

    http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/13/stephanie-pratt-not-guilty-dui/2#comments

    Hills star Stephanie Pratt NOT GUILTY in DUI?!?!? come on, MTV must have paid the LAPD off!

    Reply
  154. pickwick said on November 16th, 2009 at 7:25 am

    even people on perez are doubting this couple. they used to only fawn. really think Ian’s book is sort of the nail in the coffin of the relationship-facade. can’t WAIT to read it.

    Reply
  155. Astro said on November 16th, 2009 at 7:48 am

    The Daily Mirror, for instance, ran the headline, “Sombre Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie look distant on a rare night out as they join A-listers at art party.”

    “Somber?” (as we prefer to spell it) Really?

    http://www.gossipcop.com/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitt-paint-different-picture-of-relationship-at-art-exhibit/

    Reply
  156. video said on November 16th, 2009 at 8:52 am

    The police were video taped by X17 at Brad and Angelina’s home over the weekend but insist there was no problems. Huh? Uniformed police officers in a cruiser on the tax payers’ payroll. WTF?

    http://x17video.com/celebrity_video/bra … rad_an.php

    The video tape says sunday the police came over

    Reply
  157. Tamara said on November 16th, 2009 at 9:34 am

    @Astro:
    OMG, all you have to do is look at the body language!! These two are NOT together, they can’t even stand to be in the same room. Take a look back at a HAPPY Brad with Jen, notice the loooooooove, the hand holding, the kisses, the laughing, it is NIGHT and DAY. If these two phonies want the world to believe the book is rubbish they should put on their best Oscar Worthy performance and convince the world they are madly in love, if this is the best they can do then its no wonder their Oscar hands are still empty!! Madame Tussaud called, she wants her wax figures back!!

    Reply
  158. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    X17 reporting police visit to The Brand’s house …. another suicide attempt ? I doubt it…. think they had the heat on too high in the house and her body wax started to melt away …. not much left other than some big lips, hair and teeth and a skeleton hahaha

    http://x17video.com/celebrity_video/brad_pitt/police_make_a_visit_to_brad_an.php

    Reply
  159. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 11:06 am

    Yep, this makes the second trip to their LA home in as many years. Angie is pulling her old BBT ploy to keep him around longer.@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  160. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 11:49 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Hi Patty ! You know when vampires can’t draw blood any longer they finally collapse … :)

    Reply
  161. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    Two Zombie clowns …biochemically regenerated humans … I bet you : It’s not them ! lol@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  162. Tamara said on November 16th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    LOL Funny Ags!

    Reply
  163. mooki said on November 16th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    @mooki:

    her pothead brother needs to go to rehab though

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/11/16/tom-cruise-katie-holmes-anniversary-dinner-at-abe-louies/
    Tom and Katie go out for an “anniversary” dinner. Suri’s still on the bottle. When I was 3 yrs. old, I went straight to the sippy-cup

    Reply
  164. Tamara said on November 16th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    I didn’t see the police article on the Brand on x17, all I saw was an article about their latest endeavor, snake inspired jewelry! LOL So appropriate LOL Is it possible they were told to take down the post? I went back like 7 pages and didn’t see hide nor hair of it!

    Reply
  165. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    @Tamara:
    Try this Tam http://x17video.com/celebrity_video/bra … rad_an.php

    Reply
  166. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    they may have taken it down hmmmmm

    Reply
  167. Tamara said on November 16th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Nope, its gone! Tell me, did you see it today? And we are supposed to believe that they don’t (or someone they pay to do it) scour the internet for every word written about them? LOL They sure got that article pulled fast enough. And in its place a nice little filler about their charitable new endeavor, designing jewelry for charity -puhleeze – how much of that money actually goes to the charity, not a heck of a lot after they pay themselves, huh? Those ugly ass snake rings are being sold for over $500 a piece.

    Reply
  168. Astro said on November 16th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    More Links Together

    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie Design Snake-Inspired Jewelry

    http://www.usmagazine.com/stylebeauty/news/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-design-snake-inspired-jewelry-20091611

    Brad & Angelina’s New Jewelry Line
    http://www.starmagazine.com/brad_angelinas_new_jewelry_line/news/16239

    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie Are a Designer Duo
    http://www.okmagazine.com/2009/11/brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-are-a-designer-duo/

    Reply
  169. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @Tamara:

    It makes you wonder . doesn’t it, if Ian was referring to their little Jewellery Business when posting about ‘ Blood Diamonds ” , remember ??? Would be interesting to know, where the bling comes from originally ?
    $ 500 a piece ? No sweat. Next times she visits Dafur .. she’ll have her cigar girl box around her pouch selling her bling to the warlords ..hahaha…
    P.S. saw that video today… and yes, they have many scouts ( besides Astro) …lol

    Reply
  170. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    var entry_id = “12508″; var entry_tags = “Angelina Jolie,Brad Pitt,house,incident,police”;

    Reply
  171. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    I tried to post the video from X17 showing the police at Brad’s and Angie’s home Sunday, but it wouldn’t work. sorry.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  172. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @ Tamara:
    This URL works for me. The video shows two police cars at Brad’s home. The paparazzi are asking if Brad Pitt is Okay, and the police reply , “Yea”. That’s about it.

    http://x17video.com/celebrity_video/brad_pitt/police_make_a_visit_to_brad_an.php

    Reply
  173. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Strange though, the paparazzi didn’t ask if Angie was okay, just , “Is Brad Pitt okay?” Could be a clue here.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  174. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Thanks Patty …. sounds like BP is the victim here … maybe she pulled the beads off his beard …ouch !

    Reply
  175. video said on November 16th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    x17 has a story up from the police

    Reply
  176. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    LOL Aggie, or tried to sew his balls back on!@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  177. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    Another thought. Remember we were told part of Ian’s book refers to Angie’s violent temper and the way she throws things, etc. in a rage? Someone HAD to have called the police for a damn good reason for them to send TWO cars to Brad’s and Angie’s home. When the paps asked the police if, “Brad Pitt okay?”….to me sounds like another Angie rage and throw session!! Gone WRONG!@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  178. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 16th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Do you think that’s why they whipped them out for the photo opp? Was it hastily arranged to deflect from the police incident? Or did the museum thing happen before? Let’s face it, the body language makes it look like neither of them want to be there. Makes me wonder whether they were forced into it at short notice? What do we think?

    Reply
  179. I'm on the bidet said on November 16th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Ya’ll better watch out with those comments! Angie is protected by snake power! And all this time you thought she worshiped Set instead of Quetzalcoatl. I don’t think I’ll buy the jewelry, but if she ever designs a snake-patterned bidet cozy, I might just be interested:
    http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/articles/2009/11/16/20091116brangelina.html

    And today’s self-awareness award goes to Megan “I’m not a tigress like Angelina” Fox for her quote “I don’t know if I’m talented, I don’t know what I can do or can’t do.” I find myself stunned to be in complete agreement with Megan Fox:
    http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/articles/2009/11/16/20091116megan-fox.html

    Reply
  180. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 16th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    Interesting Q&A on Ted C’s Bitch Back – way to avoid answering the question Ted! Sounds like he’s still a bit on the payroll (or at least anti-Ian) to me:

    Dear Ted:
    In Ian Halperin’s book on Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, he says that Angie and her team waged a mean-spirited campaign against Jennifer Aniston and planted stories to the media about how Jen didn’t want kids, etc. Do you think this is true? I mean, it wouldn’t shock me, Angie does seem to me a manipulative witch and I can see her doing this, just wanted your thoughts. Come on, Ted, please tell me that Angie hasn’t changed at all and this “Mother Teresa” persona she wants us all to believe is one big old act!
    —Anc

    Dear Bitchalina:
    Whether Brange planted stories or not, some of those are in fact true. And hell, no, A.J.’s totally saintly, now, don’t you know?

    Reply
  181. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Or possibly deflecting the question since Ian’s book is out so soon. Hummmmmm

    As to the outing and terribly strained show of togetherness, i think that was immediately before the brouhaha at home. They left the museum right after the showing even though they had “friends” staying afterward for the dinner. And, the police were called in the night. I’d say all hell broke loose after they returned home, and Angie lost control of her Cobra-like temper once again, and as the police were asked by one of the paparazzi as they were leaving if Brad was okay…..well, Angie whopped his ass once again imo@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  182. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    Angie not only ripped off Bradley’s balls, she whipped him with them. Karma is a biotch Bradley.@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  183. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 16th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    I see there is a sligthly negative article about the Brange’s most recent publicty stunt at MOCA in The Daily Mail. I remember Ian gave his MJ scoop to The Mail. I wonder if they’re on board for the Brange book?

    BTW Truthteller – thanks so much for your kind words, but I have to say it is not too difficult to be witty when you have material such as Brangelina and Mia for inspiration! When Brangelina and the loons are history I think I may have to retire!

    Reply
  184. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 16th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    And as if to add insult to injury on this week of epic Brangelina failing, have you guys seen the jewellery collection?!

    http://www.dlisted.com/node/34842#comments

    Is this for real? Are Asprey really going to sell this sub-Argos-looking tat in the name of the charidee known as “Brangelina”? Has the sky fallen in? So THAT’S why they did the art gallery photo opp, it’s part of the promotional plan to accompany it’s launch i.e. Brad and Angelina look elegant and cultured at MOCA – Apsrey sells jewellery and trinkets designed by said power arty couple and everyone’s a winner! I wonder if one of them – probably Ange – was refusing to show up at the photo opp and the other kicked off and fisticuffs ensued (hence the police)? I think it had to be something like that, they could barely bear to look at, or stand anywhere near, each other that night. For Angelina to not be mauling Brad for attention there had to be something seriously up I reckon. Does anyone agree this was the chain of events?

    Reply
  185. Pattyanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    On one site, whos name i’ve now forgotter, they posted photos of Angie at the MOCA event and when you clicked on the photo….up comes information to “buy this look for $200!” LMBOOOooooooooo@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  186. mooki said on November 16th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    http://forums.whyweprotest.net/305-tom-katie/big-tom-cruise-katie-holmes-news-thread-part-third-51262/13/http://www.popsugar.com/6259432?page=0,0,3

    ——————————————————————————–

    Does anyone else think that the woman in the red coat in this photo on the left (taken in Boston, MA on Sunday, Nov. 15th) looks like Laurisse Stuckenbrock, constant companion and “communicator” for David Miscavige?

    “I know it is only from the back but, to me anyway, it doesn’t look like Katie (note photo on the right from same night – Katie has much longer hair tied up in bun in the back). If it is Laurisse Stuckenbrock then DM had to have been there somewhere. Also note Tom’s angry facial expression in the photo with the woman in the red coat. Looks to me like an “Oh shi….” moment.”

    note other photos taken of Katie and Suri ON THE SAME day. hmmm, Katie and Suri doubles?

    Reply
  187. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    …..hahahaha…..the size of them probably bigger than his brain …lol

    Reply
  188. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    … I saw that too…. it’s Armani Prive she is pimping

    Reply
  189. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Fighting Fight Club Style …… LOL

    Reply
  190. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    LOL .. be careful you may get what you wish for and that snake bites you in the butt lol :)

    Reply
  191. mooki said on November 16th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-ian-mckellen14-2009nov14,0,4922250.story

    Ian McKellan on Hollywood’s closeted leading men: “The conventional wisdom is that if you are gay, you cannot play the romantic straight lead in a movie. They’d rather have ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’ The proposition from Mephistopheles as you sign the agreement that you will become a Hollywood star is that you will lie about yourself. That’s selling your soul. This business may involve disguise, but it’s about telling the truth. And I don’t think a closeted actor in this day and age can act as well as an actor who is out.”

    Reply
  192. pickwick said on November 16th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    @Pattyanne:@Pattyanne:
    Pattyanne, I bet you’re right about this one. This video has been removed from everywhere.
    Did you notice in the closeup of his face how he seemed to be clenching his teeth. His jawline was very tense. He looked angry. If you can’t stop looking angry for thirty minutes to have your photo done in front of all those people, you are REALLY mad.
    You people are the coolest to find out about the police call. I didn’t see that anywhere else. And you had to be quick before they cleaned it up!!

    Reply
  193. Ms Agatha said on November 16th, 2009 at 11:36 pm

    @pickwick:
    you still can watch video (click off General Hospital Trailer) cops came 1.30 pm Sunday afternoon

    http://x17online.com/celebrities/brad_pitt/x17_xclusive_cops_called_to_brad_pitt_and_angelina_jolies_house-11162009.php

    Reply
  194. keane cyber queen supreme said on November 17th, 2009 at 4:51 am

    Yeah she definitely has a deal with Armani Prive now, she wore one of their dresses to the BAFTAs recently too and at the time I thought it was an odd choice because it wasn’t all that. I guess the St John thing didn’t work out so she went for a more subtle product endorsement. She also has deals possibly with The Gap and palm pre I reckon – the latter one for sure. Hey she can’t keep selling them babies, so how else is a greedy bey-otch to make money?

    Reply
  195. jan/sa said on November 17th, 2009 at 8:59 am

    what a pair of pretentious assholes taking and ancient idea that was popular in the 70 and now claiming this is their idea and design, even then it was not a big hit as very few people want to wear a snake as a ring or pendant. give me beautiful butterflies, colourfull stone designs or something for woman that is cute and new not this old shit they have now as a jewelery design. this must be the most worthless and stupid couple that has ever come out of hw imo. each time they let out a new idea or become a artichect, designer or a great ambassordoe for the poor they get a reaction from me that i want to tell them to their face you two are real asholes, morons and please STFU and just evapourize. (sorry for the spelling but i really must rant about these two morons they are just the shits. ) trying to give up smoking so bear with me. i am just wondering what happened to the art and stuff this woman took from the people of namabia and she was going to promote and help them get a foot in the door to sell their art and wares? there was an article about this and will try to look it up. maybe the bicycles and the few hospital equipment came out of this. i think these two charity fund must be opened up and made available to the world and exactly how much of their own money they donate. i just watched a programme where somebody stated that they help build 3 houses in one week in NOLA and yet peebrain has build how many with all the money he collect from his rich friends and yet he has not been there for how many months and now he is a jewelery designer what a load of shit. RANT OVER FOR NOW TILL THEY PEE ME OFF THE NEXT TIME THEY OPEN THEIR YAPPY FISH LIPS. JMO

    Reply
  196. I'm on the bidet said on November 17th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    @jan/sa:
    “trying to give up smoking so bear with me.” – perhaps you should try the new nicotine patches designed by Brangelina? Instead of a small patch, its a long, snake-shaped strip that you wrap around one of your appendages, serpentine-style, to deliver medication whilst also being at the height of fashion! Realistic snake-skin patterns will make everyone think you are actually under attack by a cobra or black momba, which is sure to be a great conversation starter at brunch (plus it will frighten away small children so that you can smoke without guilt after the patch runs out). Its sterile, its fashionable, its medical, its Jolie-rific, its the Brangie Nico Snake! Note: illegal in most countries. Side effects include delusions of grandeur, gerontological flatulence disorder, and a strong desire to adopt.

    All humor aside, I hope you win your battle against smoking, its really a horrible and dangerous habit. Best of luck to you.

    Reply
  197. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    You can do it jan/sa. It isn’t easy, but the benefits are huge! Just tell yourself when you crave one, that the craving will only last 20 min., and you can outlast that. Worked for me 8 years ago, and no, i didn’t gain a ton of weight, but i did go around for a few months sucking on a sugar free tootsi-pop sorta candy…wink!!@jan/sa:

    Reply
  198. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    Lol, boy do you have their number~!! They will never be alone as long as they have a mirror to admire themselves in. As for Bradey, i give up on him, he isn’t going to break free; whatever it is she holds over his head it has to be worse than the worse thing we know about her for him to ramain . But……this was they can both fade into obscurity together. I am soooooo sick of Brangelina and their fakery! Jolie needs to buy a country and elect herself gawd so she can create her perfect world, just toss Brad a few BRICKS of Hash to keep him quiet. BRICKS? Where the Ell did they come by BRICKS of HASH? Surely not on the open drug market, no decent drug dealer could manage to carry so much around.@I’m on the bidet:

    Reply
  199. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Sez Ted C. :

    “Dear Ted:
    Was Angie on the mystery diet when she and Brad got together? If so, why would a man want to have a huge family with a less than “healthy” woman? How accurate is the new bio on these two?
    —Kesurface

    Dear Bust Up Brange:
    Yes, Brad very well knew what he was getting into when he ran over to be Jolie’s pet.”

    HaHaHaHa…Jolie’s PET! I guess she neuters ALL her male pets huh?

    Reply
  200. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    Ted also states that Brad knew all along about Angie’s “habit” yet went willingly to be with her because he’s so in lurvvvvvvvvvvvvvv. That , if true, puts an entirely different take on Brad’s responsibilities toward the SIX KIDS he collected/donated sperm for/iv produced/bought/gifted. So he’s going to stick it out with the drugged out ho…but what about the kids? Will they all sit around the room doing their personal drug of choice in the future? Sick Brad, you’re sick!

    Reply
  201. Kate said on November 17th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Ted seems to be the only on saying that, and a year ago he said the opposite, that Brad did nothing about it because of the PR it brought, and he just did not give a sh*t. Lately those bitch backs have sounded like they have been written by someone else, that or he just going back and forth on a weekly basis to appease the masses. Everyone else around them still say they are not together, and it is just co-parenting. Pitt could be putting out multiple stories so no one knows what the truth is, except body that clenched jaw tells the truth every time. He walks in front of her, leaving her four feet behind, he turns his back on her when she speaks to him, hard to dismiss that. Where is the love Ted?

    Reply
  202. Kate said on November 17th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Hey Keane , how are you? I would love to know what the custody arrangement is? Surely they have it worked out by now. They don’t plan to keep this sham up forever, that is not realistic.

    Reply
  203. Tamara said on November 17th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    @Kate:
    Of everything that’s been said and done, the one thing they can’t seem to fake is the body language. I can’t help comparing theirs to his with Jen and the difference is unmistakable. Even when Jen and Brad were breaking up the love and respect they had for each other was clear in their body language, they had fun together, they really “liked” each others company. With AJ and BP though, it looks like they cannot stand each other, they can’t even be in the same room. There is no way these two are still together, at least not physically and mentally it looks like they hate each other. Brad just looks pissed off most of the time, he is really angry with her.

    Reply
  204. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 17th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @Kate:

    Hey hun, good thanks, how about yourself? I am starting to think now that that photo opp might have been set up to deliberately show them looking “distanced” from each other. The fact that she didn’t try to touch him, had her hands in her pockets (WTF?) all the time, that they stood a foot away from each other at all times and she was also pictured standing on her own makes me think it might have been planned that way as a subtle signal that the end was nigh. Very much like the Diana by the Taj Mahal photos of course, but nowhere near as iconic! Somehow I don’t think anything this couple does in the public sphere is done in any other way than perfectly choreographed movements. I wonder if they did a storyboard for the pics beforehand? It honestly wouldn’t surprise me!

    And I’m On the Bidet that was so blimming hilarious and so true. Let the flogging of the Brangie merchandise begin is what I say – time to sell that brand to the highest bidder! Wasn’t she meant to be working on a perfume with Posh Spice? Surely the obligatory fashion line and range of Brangelina canned goods will only be a matter of time? I tell you what, this woman is no different to the likes of Paris Hilton, Posh Spice and Katie Price – they LOVE money and are as greedy as hell. Wonder how long it will take for her to bring out a kid’s clothing range modelled by her beautiful offspring/acquisitions? In this economy, I give her about 18 months!

    Reply
  205. Tamara said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    And don’t forget McDonald’s while we’re at it, wonder how much they got paid for that??

    Reply
  206. jan/sa said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    thanks but i would rather smoke my self to death than wear anything these two morons sell or copy from other designers. as for staying together i say please stay together i have never seen two people age and look so pensionerish in my whole life within such a short space of time. i will have to stop smoking if i wish to see these two in 10 years time. what a motivation smoke or live to see benjamin button in reverse. pittshitt and jolietit in 10 years looking like ancient mummies with snake rings all over even a small dick ring of a green snake for peewee,s small peepee. jmo

    Reply
  207. Togi said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    First off … HELLO ALL. Second, IOTB, you’re killing me! LOL. Third, KATE … regarding Ted C (I know, I am PREDICTABLY sticking up for him .. haa haaa), I think he’s being sarcastic when he makes praising remarks about AJ!

    KEANE: If anyone else says they HEART YOU, I am gonna bust their chop because I SAID IT FIRST! LOL.

    Reply
  208. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @Togi:

    Lol! Hey, I never say no to a bit of internet love – it’s more than I get in real life! Ha ha.

    Reply
  209. Togi said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    Oh, and another thing. I believe the Brange staged their “appearance” the other day as well. It’s pretty obvious to me, and I am no body language expert, that they were purposely keeping to themselves. And Ange looks awful. So does Brad. All things stated are JMO. :-)

    Reply
  210. Togi said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Yeah … I hear ya! My hubby may be good looking, but that’s only on the outside, hon! Let’s put it this way … ALL my cats run and hide when he comes through the door, my sweet little Australian Shepherd waddles like a “U” to her kennel, and our daughter either hides or completely ignores him. Make with that what you will. Internet love is good. :-)

    Reply
  211. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    How true Togi~! A roll of Seran Wrap and you’re safe to go! J/K. As to Brad and Ange at the art showing, i saw a video on one of the television celebrity news channels last night in which Brad was softly stroking Angie’s upper arm from behind, elbow to shoulder and back, over and over. I nearly put my shoe through the tv.@Togi:

    Reply
  212. video said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I thought the same but then this video came up with brad and angelina

    Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
    How true Togi~! A roll of Seran Wrap and you’re safe to go! J/K. As to Brad and Ange at the art showing, i saw a video on one of the television celebrity news channels last night in which Brad was softly stroking Angie’s upper arm from behind, elbow to shoulder and back, over and over. I nearly put my shoe through the tv

    Reply
  213. Tamara said on November 17th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    @Togi:
    Awwwww Togi!! Do YOU run and hide too when you see him? That’s sad to me….:(

    Reply
  214. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    Me too Video, i was taken aback by it, and have no idea what his motives could be other than he just wanted to “pet” her??? Why? Especially with the war going on, and the police being called to their home that very afternoon with the paparazzi asking the officers if Brad is alright? Makes no sense to me, was he trying to sooth a violent temper? Her eyes were hugely dialated in those photos as well, indication speed once again. Crystal Meth??@video:

    Reply
  215. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 17th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    where is the video?

    Reply
  216. Togi said on November 17th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @Tamara:
    Hey Tam … I made my comment elsewhere. :-)

    Reply
  217. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.aspx?contractUrl=2&language=en-US&assetType=film&p=Angelina%20Jolie#

    Hold your cursor on photo #2 from the left and you will see Brad stroking Angie’s upper arm in a tender way….wth???

    Reply
  218. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    it doesn’t show it as it was on the entertainment news program on last evening, late night, but last night’s version was of his hand rubbing her left arm from elbow to shoulder many times slowly. On this video, it appears much less contact, and quicker. I have no idea if it was altered on either video. @Pattyanne:

    Reply
  219. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    http://whoissalt.com/

    A quality video trailer of AJ’s summer 2010 movie SALT. Shame they couldn’t get Tom Cruise for the SALT role..AJ sux

    Reply
  220. Tamara said on November 17th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @Togi:
    ……..Men!!!! LOL

    Reply
  221. stinky-inky said on November 17th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    Oh yeah, they are so hip with the snake jewelry. Too bad they don’t have a time machine to take them back to 2006. The snake fad is so over in jewelry design. Do a search of snake at ross-simon and all you get is clearance merchandise. CLEARANCE!!!

    Reply
  222. too curious said on November 17th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Is that one of those “control” moves that someone was talking about a while back – you know, the ones she appears to use with the kids?

    Reply
  223. Togi said on November 17th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    So, do you think Brad is going for the Old Hippy look? Or is he trying to look like a Rastafarian? Hmmmm. Whatever it is, it looks funny on a man his age.

    Reply
  224. stinky-inky said on November 17th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    @Togi:
    Personally, I think the billy goat look is an outward manifestation of self-loathing. jmho

    Reply
  225. Tamara said on November 17th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @Togi:
    You know, there was a point with Jen that Brad had that awful beard…does anyone remember the time frame of the beard, was it right before they broke up??

    Reply
  226. Tamara said on November 17th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @too curious:
    I think she was frozen with anger, they both seem to be really angry, she HAD to attend this opening that she didn’t want to go to, judging by her eyes she was high on something, and I think Brad was trying to soothe her so she didn’t combust in public. Maybe he has learned that a light touch will calm her if she’s in a certain “state”

    Reply
  227. stinky-inky said on November 17th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Do we know anything more about why the po-pos were called to the house? Did someone forget the safe word? Did one of the kids call? Was there a 9-1-1 call? If so, there would be a tape of that, would there not?

    Reply
  228. stinky-inky said on November 17th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    @Tamara:
    I found a bunch of photos online of Brad and Jen back when they were together and he does have a beard–but it’s more like scruff. Doesn’t look like he could weave beads in it, like he does with this one. Does anyone else remember ten or more years ago, there was that whole “I’m so beautiful I can make myself look ugly and still be beautiful” schtick going on in HW? All the stars were photographed wearing really ugly glasses.

    Reply
  229. Tamara said on November 17th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    How is it that X17 just happened to be there hmmm? I doubt if this was one of the J-Pitts photo ops, so I think X17 must be tuned into the police scanner and hi-tailed it up there, in which case, would that be a 911 call? I doubt if the police got on the radio and said: 10-4, en route to the Pitt mansion for a domestic dispute…

    Reply
  230. stinky-inky said on November 17th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    @Tamara:
    I don’t think police scanners broadcast 9-1-1 calls, but if it had been an emergency call, the dispatcher would have issued the relevant code and given the address. Savvy paps would know the address immediately. Of course, it could have been that alarm was tripped accidentally.

    Reply
  231. mooki said on November 17th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    @mooki:
    Laurisse Stuckenbrock = Tom’s next “wife”?

    Reply
  232. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    By golly i bet that’s it~! She was most likely higher than a Georgia Pine, so Brady was making an effort to control her. Pasify the druggie….hummmm, yup, makes sense to me.@too curious:

    Reply
  233. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    Stinky, my mother wore an upper arm bracelet which was a snake design way back in the late ’60’s…..Angie and Brad are so out of the loop@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  234. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    Rather interesting that only X17 reported on it, and that they only inquired if Brad was okay to the police, and now not a word from any other news sources out there. I still think Angie was throwing a world class hissie fit and was tossing valuable vases at Brady again and someone in the household help phoned for the police. Yup, not used to that sort of Taming Of The Shrew relationship.@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  235. Ms Agatha said on November 17th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    well observed Patty ! … You remember Wallis & her Prince Edward ? Sure you have heard of their bizarre relationship …. BP may fall under the same category …and Angie is the new Wallis …. (goddess and her slave)

    Reply
  236. Ms Agatha said on November 17th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Maybe he was hiding the meth under the rubber plant ? ( the one she likes to make love to … sorry , just couldn’t help it lol)

    Reply
  237. Ms Agatha said on November 17th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Who is that person ? lol Ever wonder why Angie wears black wig ??? Her hair is dark already ( or easy to dye darker) …Why let her run around ( remember that movie Run Lola Run ?) with black mop on head I wouldn’t even Mop my floor with ..lol

    Reply
  238. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    I have heard a rumor she is losing her hair….???@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  239. Pattyanne said on November 17th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    Was just thinking about Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise’s Stepford Wife….and thought that Brad Pitt is much the same with Angie Jolie…a Stepford Mate, not Husband. Strange how some seem to have such control over another person who has power in their own right…..

    Reply
  240. Astro said on November 17th, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    To IAN:
    “Brangelina: The untold story”….The Book that Died Before Birth!!!!

    Reply
  241. Togi said on November 17th, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    @Astro:
    Actually, that’s pretty funny Astro. But, alas, I believe Ian will have some pretty good “stuff” in his book. Brange will probably stay “together” in their own fashion. And I even hope they do just to keep their personal issues confined as much as possible. But I can’t believe that even YOU, Astro, would believe the kids are living exempt from Mommy and Daddy’s oddness, for lack of a nicer word.

    Reply
  242. Ms Agatha said on November 17th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Agree… hard to understand for us who are not into the lifestyle. The power exchange is consensual – at least in the beginning , everybody gets what they want …and some more than they can handle
    P.S. One of the paid-by-the-line posters just earned $ 0.25 ….lol

    Reply
  243. Ms Agatha said on November 17th, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    …yeah..she got plugs top of forehead and sides …just like him ! lol

    Reply
  244. Ms Agatha said on November 17th, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    check out photos of her from Cannes in her condom dress … clearly visible plugs

    Reply
  245. Kate said on November 18th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    That is almost as funny as that doberman they have spread eagle waiting for her over at FF. lmao who says we are the ones talking about the family pet? samcc

    Reply
  246. Kate said on November 18th, 2009 at 2:37 am

    @Tamara:
    I noticed that too, if he is not pissed off, and he really is so in luvvv with her,damn give this boy his Oscar already because he is doing an awesome job at playing the angry trapped miserable hubby. lol

    Reply
  247. Kate said on November 18th, 2009 at 2:45 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I would have agreed with that, oh but she did, she tried to wrap her arm around his waste, he peeled it off, looked awkward as he took her elbow and tried to push her away , and then rubbed her arm a bit when he realize the cameras were on him, this was when she was trying to then put her hand down on his butt as he pushed her away, and of course eonline says, hey, they are A okay. lol. All the while his jaw was clenched so tight it looked as though he was trying to break a jawbreaker with his back molars. lmao.

    who are those fools at E that are writing that crap? Did they not see him walk off and leave her 5 feet behind, or perhaps when she came giggling up to him and he blatantly turned away from her? What do some people need, a sledgehammer? just saying?

    Reply
  248. Kate said on November 18th, 2009 at 2:49 am

    @Pattyanne:
    He was petting her arm after he tried to shove her away and that got caught on camera, he caught himself just in time, you needed to see all of it to get the full picture. It was not a loving act. He looked pissed off that she touched him at all.

    Reply
  249. mooki said on November 18th, 2009 at 7:20 am

    @Pattyanne:

    prediction: TomKat will be done before the year’s out. methinks Katie won’t be as tight-lipped as Mrs. Botox Nicole about spilling her marriage to Oprah, Baba Wawa, the Today Show, GMA, etc.

    Reply
  250. d said on November 18th, 2009 at 9:08 am

    YAH to Johnny Depp being SEXIEST man alive……..Pitt didn’t make the cut LOL

    Reply
  251. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 9:11 am

    Whew, well if that’s how it happened, then they only showed the small part where Brad was rubbing her upper arm….seems the entertainment news program is pro-Jolie for editing out the best parts. And to think i nearly wrecked my tv over that….lol@Kate:

    Reply
  252. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 9:12 am

    Pitt is the SHELL of a former sexiest man alive…..Jolie sucked out all the handsome @d:

    Reply
  253. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    I honestly hope Katie does take Suri and run like Ell from COS and Cruise. Hopefully with the parental backing Katie has, she will voice her experiences with Cruise and the COS live , on Oprah, and help with the exposure of a giant fraud calling itself “church”. Keep on em mooki!@mooki:

    Reply
  254. video said on November 18th, 2009 at 9:18 am

    http://coverawards.com/2009/11/18/in-to … l-reunite/

    In Touch Magazine

    Exclusive

    YES THEY’LL REUNITE !

    As angelina panics about her battered reputation,
    jen waits for brad at the resort they love.
    New details on the big steps
    Brad and Jen are taking together in LA.

    Reply
  255. mooki said on November 18th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    in more Scilon news:
    http://gawker.com/5406973/calling-out-anderson-cooper-and-conan-obrien
    Kirstie goes batshit on Twitter again, this time her targets are Star Jones and Conan O’Brien. seriously, she’s headed toward a breakdown if she doesn’t get out of that cult

    http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b153749_bitch-back_religion_laughing_matter.html
    OSA’s John Charmichael get pwned by Ted Casablanca after attempted fair game.

    http://www.xenutv.com/blog/?p=3866
    Aussie gov. may federally investigate the cult

    Reply
  256. d said on November 18th, 2009 at 10:29 am

    @video:
    still don’t believe it. But hey stranger things have happened i suppose. If so she’s more forgiving that i would have been in her position. I still believe that the whole Pitt/Jolie was arranged to give Jennifer an out without sacrificing her reputation, and the split was desired by both her and Pitt.

    There’s so much falsehood and fakery in hollywood – too many closeted gays and fake relationships for publicity. They must really think people are stupid to believe everything they put out there. Its kinda sad as a society that we worship and follow these “beautiful” people (the majority who don’t have any education to speak of, who are famous for who they hook up with and rarely any talent , and who have altered their original appearances so much that their beauty is really a myth). ………… Dammit Toothy Tile just come out of the closet LOL…..

    Reply
  257. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Toothy did>??? Who is it? Jake?? You make a very good point about the falseness of HW, and the fantasy lives of the celebs. I think that Jolie and Pitt went wrong when they bought into their own made up PR. She’s not all that, and he’s old, tired, screwed up man. If Jen wants to get back with Brad, she needs a kick in the arse for even considering taking that fool back. I’d rather see her with another John Mayer than Brad Pitt. He has a history of using and abusing women, he’s no good for anyone but himself, and even then i wonder about him. Bet he has a mirror over his bed so he can see himself making love to the sexiest, handsomest man on the planet, himself! LOL@d:

    Reply
  258. d said on November 18th, 2009 at 10:56 am

    @Pattyanne:
    no he hasn’t CAME out of the closet…..i mean just come out already !! (BUT Yah we know its totally Jake – hello…..does Reese really look like someone who wouldn’t totally emasuclate a guy ?)

    Reply
  259. jan/sa said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    d: yes maybe jen wanted out but the arrangment was that both keep a low profile and peewee just could not becaue he hates the idea that a woman does not want his sexy self and he knew mis holie was just waiting with open what ever for him and the idea of more jungle sex was to much to waite for you know how the lions roar and bite while having sexs but of course it only lasts 3 seconds. peewee loves the fame and pr whoring more than he loves anything or anybody and on his own he is just a big nought on the list so jolie who is also a pr ho is just what he needs. if you are saying jen is gay i see no reason why she cannot admit it as she would not loose fans but gain more, she may be bi but i doubt she is a straight gay i think she could swing both ways just like peewee. but p/j arranged that i do not believe they where do the hot jungle sex from the beginning of filming and she saw the advantage of peewee though not for his peepee but the pr, and jen although not happy was willing to try counciling but ho had her hooks to deep and peewee was hooked on promises she waved in his face. he is a douch and a scumbag and i hope jen never takes him back even if he leaves the skinny one which i doubt as he is to much of a pr ho and a weak man.jmo

    Reply
  260. d said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    @jan/sa:
    i wasn’t implying jenn’s gay …..don’t know …don’t care. People’s sexuality dont particularily interest me. just wish they’d be open about it one way or the other. I agree Angie hooked up with him for PR., but i think they both got more involved quicker than they thought they would……you know the first blush and all that crap.

    IMO a lot of hollyweird players are narcissistic people who are only concerned with themselves and their image. I don’t believe Jenn ever wanted a baby……and thats’ ok. It was America’s dream for the golden couple to reproduce the golden child. I think both her and Brad were too self absorbed to ever consider children. I mean seriously – if you’re in a relationship and that relationship has top priority in your life wouldn’t you make it work with all you had…..these people don’t have to work – they’re MULTI millionares. They could’ve taken some time off, had their family if thats what they truly desired, and lived their lives together in love outside the public eyes/

    But lets face it……FAME is all they desire at any cost. So they went their separate ways – i don’t recall ms. Aniston taking time off for counselling…..she booked movie after movie. Gotta strike while you’re hot right ? I don’t really care who is at fault here, but for Brad and Angelina to keep bringing children into their fucked up lives is the ultimate in your face thing to do. And for people in the know , to ignore the oh so obvious signs of drug abuse in the 2 of them and to not force their hands for the sake of the kids, just so they can continue to collect a paycheque, is ridiculous.

    And please don’t tell me that Ian’s book will expose them. I don’t believe that for a minute. He’s not willing to get sued to save those kids cause in the end he’s all about the benjamins too. IMESHO………………..

    Reply
  261. Tamara said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:42 am

    @d:
    Apparently Jake has been having a long term romance with Austin Nichols, they have a house together and…….last year they adopted a child together. This has been all over the internet for years. Personally, I believe it. I saw Reese on an interview last week where she said in this coy little voice: Who Me? What could I possibly have to hide” and then she did the hand to mouth Austin Powers style gesture.

    Reply
  262. d said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:46 am

    @Tamara:
    exactly Tamara its COMMON knowledge…so why not just OWN it. I feel sorry for Austin but i guess in his way he’s faking it too (hello Sophia Bush). I mean how can you have a relationship built on lies ??

    Reply
  263. Tamara said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    @d:
    I feel so sorry for someone like Jake who feels he has to hide his true self, because the desire for FAME defines him, Austin must really love him to put up with this crap. I think the Brokeback Mtn role was just to say See? If I were really gay I wouldn’t be PLAYING gay now would I? So very convoluted.

    Reply
  264. d said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    @Tamara:
    or to feel out the reaction if he were to come out ? WHO knows …..so what you think will be the fallout from THE BOOK

    Reply
  265. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    I really must crawl out from under my rock more often, i had no clue Jake was actually in a gay relationship, and a commited one for such a long time. It has to be horrible to have to “hide” your love, and your family from the public for any reason. I feel sorry for Jake, his partner, and their child, but not so for Reese who must know. She’s a mother, how could she agree with this when Jake’s child has to remain hidden? It’s okay to do drugs (cough, couth, Brad and Angie), but not okay to have love in your life publically? I bet that Jake’s and Austin’s child is better loved and cared for by them, than all six of the JP crew. How sad.

    Reply
  266. d said on November 18th, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    i dont’ know if they officially adopted a child….the rumour was that there was a Baby Tile (thanks Ted C), but no one seems to be able to link one to either Austin or Jake other than Austin’s sister supposedly havin a baby around the same time as the rumours started. And i think reese didn’t want to be out there all Jennifer Aniston like – husband left for another woman, A list whose every date would be scutinized etc. I’m sure what her and Jake have is real to some extent…..and maybe they can make it work. Sometimes best friend relationships last a lot longer than sexual ones……….

    Reply
  267. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    So it’s not “official” that Jake and Austin are a couple with an adopted child? So much speculation in HW, so much fantasy, and PR hype, one never knows. Maybe all the celebs practice Smoke & Mirrors ( title of my favorite mystery book) to create an aura of mystery to engage fans, who knows. Seems truth is simply a five-letter word in HW.@d:

    Reply
  268. Tamara said on November 18th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    @d:
    Well, there are many many long term marriages in HW that have lasted under this pretense, and I don’t mean the ones that are set up for a movie premiere, I mean what people would consider real marriages with children, based on a quiet understanding between both parties. It’s been said for years that John T and Kelly P are one of them. It works for them so its up to us to respect that. I think Jake and Reese fall under this category. Reese is known in HW as one touch chick, (not the word most people would use for her! LOL) she is not to be messed with, in total control of her life and her career. She knows exactly what is going on and probably calls most of the shots.

    Reply
  269. Kate said on November 18th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    IAN , did your publisher say no to sharing any little peeks to your book?

    Reply
  270. jan/sa said on November 18th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    d: yes it is sad that these two are known to use drugs and nothing gets done about it while they adopt and pop out more bio’s but even though peewee has been outed as to smoking hash in the house with the kids they are still allowed to adopt. if this was a normal couple without the fame and all that money they would be turned down and reported and have the welfare up their backside faster than a bullet out of a gun. now it is reported he turned down a gig in dubia and lost 5 million to stay at home with the family shit he could not go because either madame had a hissy fit because he stayed longer at his last premier or he was to doped up to attend. as for ians book lets waite and see if it is a kiss-up he would loose all credibality and never again will his books sell. i just like all the people that hate injustice and lairs hope this book or at least somebody like micky will tell the truth and expose these two for what they really are no role model to the youth and just plain pr ho’s. as for their charity it is all other peoples money that they give very little of their fortune. as for any poor people benefitting from these stars please show me where and who. i will give madonna her due and oprah as they have invested their own money and spend time in africa without all the photo ops that these two morons have. when have these two every had their hands dirty and slept ate and lived with the poor never so who the hell are they to tell other about charity and giving, they should donate half their money to the poor and live like normal people if they feel so much for the poor , but they don’t even have a god who they believe in it is all about the mighty dollar. they are shitts and fake in my opinion. rant finished jmo

    Reply
  271. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    The new Life & Style magazine has tons on “Angelina’s A Total Fake” in their 11/23 edition. One tid-bit is that Angie is “desperate” to win a second Oscar and expertly manipulates the media to drum up publicity for her projects.

    “Angelina Jolie Isn’t All She Makes Herself Out To Be”

    “Angie Has No Sense OF Right And Wrong”
    “Indeed beneath her reputation as a modern-day Mother Teresa, says the insider, Angelina doesn’t care whose feelings her actions hurt. When she and Brad fell in love on the set of Mr & Mrs. Smith in 2004, he was tormented by guilt and confusion because he was still married to Jennifer Aniston. “It was Angelina who convinced Brad that their relationship was just fine,” says the insider, “She would tell him that what was happening between them was bigger than they were, that there was no way to deny it. Angie created a world where he was free of accountablilty and responsibility for another person’s feelings. She spent months convincing Brad they were destined to be together, that it couldn’t be wrong.” To this day , she’s never publicly expressed a hint of remorse.

    ~ and soooo much more~!

    Reply
  272. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 18th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    I’m pretty sure Jen was and possibly still is genuinely distraught about the breakdown of her marriage. She strikes me as a genuine person with genuine feelings for people and whether the relationship was working or not or whether she was more into women than men, I’m sure she still loved Brad and was torn to bits by him leaving her. Not everyone in HW exploits their personal life for publicity, there are plenty of actors who don’t. And if she did or didn’t go for counselling I highly doubt we would know about it! Counselling generally isn’t a 24/7 thing, people usually fit it in around working, which is what Jen has done. How else was she supposed to have any sense of normalcy – by sitting at home by herself? Great! And as for the bit about not immediately having chidren and wanting to have some fun and get the most out of your life before devoting yourself to children, well all women do that nowadays, which is why women are increasingly having children in their late 30’s and 40’s. I don’t want to have children until later in life – doesn’t mean I don’t want to have them, just want to make the most of not having any responsibilities for as long as possible. The whole idea that Jen not having children when the world wanted her to showed she cared more about her career is utter nonsense. Like most women the world over she was simply choosing to enjoy her youth for as long as possible before settling down. Can’t believe people still peddle this nonsense about her!

    Reply
  273. mooki said on November 18th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    http://forums.whyweprotest.net/15-media/tom-cruise-david-miscavige-attend-earle-cooleys-memorial-56742/

    Tom Cruise and David Miscavige attend funeral of Scilon attorney Ray Cooley… together.

    Reply
  274. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    How right you are Keane, and i believe Jolie had so many children simply to tie Brad to her firmly. In her warped mind, they are the chain that will tie Brad to her for his lifetime, or until she wants rid of him. To her, everything, everyone is simply a tool to be used to better her position.

    As for Jennifer being devistated by the ruination of her marriage and her husband flaunting his psycho-mistress around in her face….of course any woman would be. To deny Jen these feelings simply because she’s a celeb is ridiculous! To condone Jolie’s actions is an insult to all women. Jolie’s attempts to white wash her reputation by staging photo ops in foreign countries with refugees and orphans, and parading her purchased and produced children for sympathy is an indication of how shallow and selfish her thought processes are.

    Reply
  275. jan/sa said on November 18th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    patty anne: i do not think it was so much falling in love as in lust. and yes most intellegent women today are having kids later in life and most men are quite happy to waite before they start a family and want to enjoy their wives and reach the top in their field so that when the kids arrive they have more time for the family. most people also opt to have one or two kids and not an army of kids as they realize that children need attention and a lot of love and leadership and good morals in todays world because of imoral and classless people like peewee and miss jolie being promoted as role models for the youth. yes it take time and it does hurt to have the person you trusted and loved walk out on you but i am sure she has healed and would not want to go back with such a moraless man that threw her under the bus and she seems happier healthier and stronger because of this. i do not believe he was her true love and soul mate and i think in a way she is relieved that it ended sooner than later without kids involved. she will find a good man and maybe have kids if she wants. jmo

    Reply
  276. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    Well said. I agree wholeheartedly that Jennifer has healed from the Brad and Angelina Sex Fest Quick Call The Press affair. She’s a very successful businesswoman who co-owns her own production company, Echo Productions, and shows an inner strength one only gains from victory following a vicious battle. It’s Jennifer most reasonable women admire, and as for Brad? I don’t know of one woman who would take him if he came with a diamond encrusted diaper! Once a public cheat, always a public cheat. Bad enough to do it stelthly, but to be so blatently obvious (W magazine shoot) proves he has NO morals, NO compassion and NO sense of right or wrong. The child-collecting habit (another adiction of Jolie’s) is by far the cruelest thing either apart, or both together could do to a child, let alone six of them. They are not orphans, but from poor countries, with struggling, poor parents, relatives. Why , if Jolie is so compassionate a humanitarian, then didn’t she help the entire family stay together? Wouldnt’ make a good photo op is why. It’s all about me, me, me with Jolie and Pitt. They deserve one another @jan/sa:

    Reply
  277. Tamara said on November 18th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    You know, she not only lost her husband but she lost her best friend as well, which probably hurt just as much. When you break up with your sig other what would you do, call your best friend, well when that person is one and the same I imagine it leaves you doubly sore

    Reply
  278. Tamara said on November 18th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @Tamara:
    …and, most people don’t have to go through this kind of heartache on the world stage, which is why I have so much respect for her, she never lost it in public, she kept her thoughts to herself and she handled herself with dignity. When she showed up to tape her part of the Katrina PSA the whole room (all A-List) gave her a standing ovation when she walked in, that tells you what kind of person she is and how well liked she must be in HW

    Reply
  279. mooki said on November 18th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/family_feud_2hf4sqfzBJhqmtXnWwx0pJ

    Bijou Phillips skips premiere due to “family conflicts”. Reportedly Scilon Bijou (who’s dating one of the infamous Masterson brothers) tried to fair game sis Mackenzie.

    Reply
  280. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    So true; Jennifer Aniston has grace and style, something Angie Jo aspires to but will never have. Brad has fooled himself, as well as MADE a fool of himself by stating that he considers Angie Jo “Elegant”… Hahaha@Tamara:

    Reply
  281. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    Actually, i don’t even believe it was Lust that brought these two sexually perverted people together. For Jolie it’s all about her perception of “Winning”. In her eyes she won BBT from Laura Dern, and she repeated it with Brad, whom she and Mickey Brett made fun of constantly behind Brad’s back. Aquiring means much more to Angelina Jolie than the “having”. Same with the kiddies. Gung Ho on aquiring them, but once gotten, toss the new ones to the army of nannies, and off they go around the world making movies for ego boosts. Most everything in Angelina Jolie’s life is treated by her as a PROP. To be used to further her ego. Period.@jan/sa:

    Reply
  282. ladybert62 said on November 18th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    TO MOOKI: Hi Mooki. There is an interesting article on Huffingtonpost.com about COS and forced abortions and other such things. I dont know how to get the actual citation to appear here so I thought I would just let you know it was there since you always keep us advised of similar COS nasty news. ha ha! It appears on the huffingtonpost.com for today 11/18/9. Very interesting read and I thought you would enjoy it. Peace. :D

    Reply
  283. stinky-inky said on November 18th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Nail. Meet hammer.

    Reply
  284. Pattyanne said on November 18th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    Right on there stinky.@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  285. Alif said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    @d:
    JMO!
    You don’t know what your’e demanding! Whoever it is, his career will be over. He’ll be the novelty for a while. The fair-haired puppet of the gay agenda. Only for a while. Then the gays will move on to the next target.
    Some straight people may show just how “tolerant” they are; probably inwardly congratulating themselves while they’re at it! Very self-aggrandizing; but the conservatives in the industry will soon enough phase whoever outs themselves out of the big parts.

    Many gays in the media are the most selfish people regarding show biz. They play games with celebs. They have nothing to lose regarding the actor. The actor has his livelihood at stake. But certain gays are oblivious to that.

    But the moviegoers will not concentrate on the acting as much as thinking of the actor as being gay.

    That’s why gay american actors in the history of the movies do not out themselves.

    Reply
  286. Alif said on November 18th, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    This is an old, old, old story!
    Two great actors were in love with each other most of their lives, but had to stay in the closet because their livelihoods were at stake.
    But Cary Grant and Randolph Scott were not the only ones. Not by a long shot!
    (Late in their lives, Grant and Scott were observed holding hands in a dark, secluded part of a restaurant.)

    Marlon Brando outed himself, as well as Paul Newman. Two acting giants! But had they done that early in their careers, there wouldn’t be much of a career for them. The public wouldn’t see their films. They’d make the gays ecstatic, but they would have sacrificed what they worked their tails off to achieve.

    There are certain things an actor should never say. One of them is “Im gay”. Another is “I will not serve in an american war”; or something similar to that.
    History hasn’t been kind to any actor who voices those beliefs. Even as far back as WW1. There was an actor who was #1 in popularity, Jack Kerrigan. After he declared he would not serve, his career was soon over.

    Reply
  287. Alif said on November 19th, 2009 at 12:16 am

    And to add to that, there was, later on, in the 1920’s, an actor who was #1 at the boxoffice. His name was William Haines. He made tons of money for his studio.
    The head of the studio was a dictator. He told WH that he had better get rid of Jimmy. (WH’s love).
    William Haines told Louis B. Mayer, that if he, LBM, would get rid of his wife, then he’d get rid of Jimmy.
    William Haines was soon blackballed in the industry. Not the end of the story.
    Joan Crawford came to WH’s rescue! She hired Haines as her interior decorator. Carole Lombard, and others soon did the same, and Haines had a very lucrative career the rest of his life.
    And he lived happily with Jimmy; although he was targeted by a non-professional in a scandal, later.
    They survived.

    Reply
  288. Исполнитель said on November 19th, 2009 at 2:07 am

    Превосходно!!!

    Reply
  289. Forse said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    Читаешь это и думаешь….

    Reply
  290. Togi said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:24 am

    @Alif:
    Wow, Alife. A lot of interesting info there. I swear … I NEVER knew Paul Newman outted himself. When did he do that? And under what circumstances? I’m thinking you probably know. Also … have you ever tried your PM thingy on this site? I have a question for you.

    Reply
  291. Alif said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:50 am

    @Togi:
    No, it was Brando talkedd about Newman.

    Reply
  292. Alif said on November 19th, 2009 at 4:12 am

    @Alif:
    I never really registered; so I don’t have a PM to click on.

    If the question is personal, I don’t give out that info. Otherwise, I’ll register another day, if that’s the way to get a PM section.

    Oh, and Brando said he spoke from personal experience. He was a very free spirit; Brando was!

    That information came from people I’ve known who were in show business as former actors, secretaries, personal assistants, or just were guests at parties, etc!
    Also, their relatives may have given them information.
    I find this out at private men-only meetings, (married, divorced, straight, gay, bi) of up to forty attendees.
    And on a very few occasions, actors, themselves.
    Sometimes, it gets to be too much. In other words, I’ve heard enough.
    But I had to respond to those who seem to eat up every word that Ted C. writes about vulnerable actors without apparent retaliations or repercussions of any kind.
    JMO, but that’s abusing a privileged postition.

    I’ve also read a lot of the history of hwd.

    Reply
  293. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    So sad, such cruelty to interfer with another life that way. We are who we are, and no amount of threatening can change that. I admired his response to LBM though, showed courage, and comittment, traits most HW actors lack today, hetro, or homo. @Alif:

    Reply
  294. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Us Weekly: “Her Secret Deal.”
    “Katie Holmes is sad and lonely because she’s “committed herself” to a seven-year contract and Tom tells her what to wear, how to cut her hair and when to work out. “He even told her to be pale like Nicole [Kidman],” says a source. Meanwhile, Suri is 3 going on 30 with her heels and San Pelligrino and so on. As for Katie, the mag says her “situation” will “not improve until November 2013,” when her contract is up. ”

    http://www.celebitchy.com/81179/will_katie_holmes_tell_the_world_about_tom_cruises_secret_xenumobile/

    Reply
  295. Astro said on November 19th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    Jennifer Aniston, Brad Pitt WILL (Not) Reunite!

    http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2009/11/jennifer-aniston-brad-pitt-will-not-reunite/

    Reply
  296. Astro said on November 19th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    Brad Pitt: Family Man Over Funds

    The 45-year-old family man recently declined an invitation to the Oct. 31 Grand Prix Ball in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates — and the $5 million payday that came with it.

    Instead he opted to stay in LA to trick-or-treat (dressed as DJ Lance Rock from Yo Gabba Gabba!) with Angelina Jolie and the kids on Oct. 31.

    Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/#ixzz0XKVf6SI6

    Reply
  297. mooki said on November 19th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=14763
    From ESMB user “Iknowtoomuch” 05:53 AM:
    “I recieved a call last night from a family member. Even which one I can’t say as it could be tracked down pretty easily at this point. I’ll just say it’s a “he”.

    So i was on the phone with him last night when he told me how they were basically interogating him and that they never used to do this type of thing and he was thrown off by it. They put him in a room and got pretty mean with him.

    Well that sure opened the door for me to go for it. And I did just that. I started with the things they can confront. Which is the tech and how management is not applying it. At first he was justifyinf then I started digging deep and getting into KSW and he started telling me I had a really good points. I had to get off the phone with him but this wasn’t just a sead it was a already a growing bud.

    But I really feel for him because he’s in a terrible spot in regards other family members and disconnection.

    But he’s woken up some on his own and now a willing recipient of the truth. I’ll be calling him over the next few days to make sure he doesn’t sink into the shitter and really start justifying the shit that goes on.

    It’s a win so far.”

    Reply
  298. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    Thank you Alif, you always shed a bit of light on a matter that is of interest to me. Grant and Scott were no surprise, but i was surprised about Paul Newman. Must be really difficult to have to live the only life one has, in secret.@Alif:

    Reply
  299. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Astro, you missed this one:

    “Family Bonding; Angie reunites with family! Including long-lost cousins, sunts, and uncles” Now you know that means the end is near, each of them are trying to position themself in a more favorable light for the division of property…aka….six kids.@Astro:

    Reply
  300. Togi said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @Alif:
    OMG … sorry Alife. I am actually embarrassed! Noooooooo! It’s nothing PERSONAL, as in the person behind “Alife”. Ugh. I should probably be more careful how I word things! :-(

    Reply
  301. Togi said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Patty … I think “difficult” is an understatement. I can’t even imagine how it must feel and I won’t pretend that I do. I would think it would cause a lot of personal issues, however.

    Reply
  302. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    True Togi. I will never understand why discrimination in any form exists in today’s world.

    US Magazine has a lot of exerpts from Ian’s book. One bit is about a source stating Angie has been using Crystal Meth recently, but then we all figured that one out ourselves just by looking at her photos. She’s very obvious when “using”. Seems the war of the roses is on big time now….@Togi:

    Reply
  303. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Helloooooo Ian sweetie, didn’t you say if your publisher would give the Okay you would drop a few tid-bits to us pre-book release? Hint, Hint! wink!!

    Reply
  304. Alif said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Paul Newman was teased about he and Redford being an item back in the Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, days. He always responded with good humor, which deflected the rumors. Same as what John Travolta does, nowadays.

    But the main thing I remember about Paul Newman, is that he seemed an all-around good guy. He ususally made sure the minorities in his flicks came out as decent human beings; esp. after he had more clout in the industry.

    I also remember the terrible blow he had to deal with when his beloved son died.

    Then there’s the incredible charity works he did, without the media show. And all the proceeds from his endeavors going to charitable causes. Quite the man, and a great credit to his industry, imo!
    And he wore his “liberal hat” proudly!

    Reply
  305. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    How thoughtful of Brad Pitt~! He just flew over to France for two days before returning to LA, to sign papers purchasing the place next door to Miraval that George Clooney had checked out. Now when Brad and Angie separate, Brad can live next door when he’s in France, and keep an eye on the kids and the nannies. How sweet~!

    Reply
  306. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    How true Alif, he still has Newman’s Own brand sellilng in markets, with procedes going to his favorite charities, not only was he a good man in life, but in death as well.>@Alif:

    Reply
  307. Togi said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    Paul Newman was one of my favorites. I loved the movie “Cool Hand Luke.” One of the best movies I’ve ever seen. And yes, PN was quite a man. All that charity work … and he didn’t even wear a saint’s hat. Never walked around with that neon sign flashing “Look at me! Look at me! Aren’t I such a wonderful person?” I think there still are some celebrities out there like that … the ones we don’t hear about, and wont’ hear about, until they’re gone.

    Reply
  308. Togi said on November 19th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Did he really? Where did you hear about that one? My gosh. With all their spending, how do these people have any money left?

    Reply
  309. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    It was all over X17 Togi. I don’t think it’s meant to expand a single family estate, but a separate home for him apart from her after the official split. She’s said she likes the freedom she enjoys in France and intends to make it her home base, so i guess he’s taking advantage of the property next door being up for sale to live near by. Really just guessing about these two worn out mental cases.@Togi:

    Reply
  310. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    Paul Newman was real. He cared, truly cared, and thus did something to make a difference to ALL, not one. He was a real humanitarian in every sense, and didn’t need to take a truck load of photogs with him to ensure it would get into the papers to boost his ego like some (AJ) we know of. He will be missed, but i think Joanne will carry on his mission.

    Reply
  311. too curious said on November 19th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    In case you didn’t know this, Newman’s Own TRULY donates all profits to charity – at the end of each fiscal year all profits would be donated to charity and Paul lent the company the funds to start the next year. I’m guessing that he made some provision for his estate/heirs to continue doing this.

    Reply
  312. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    yes TC, i knew that, which is why i was so very impressed with the character of Paul Newman. There was so much more to this man than we , the public , ever saw. You notice also that his daughters were never paraded in the press either.@too curious:

    Reply
  313. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    When looking at the photo of Brad used on the book cover, it’s a major reminder of how much he’s changed for the worse in the four years he has been half of the Toxic Duo. Seems he’s paid his dues for his lack of character and moral values. Now it’s the kids i am concerned for, they will grow up emulating the custodial parent, considering how Angie tosses them to the army of nannies to raise, perhaps that will turn out to be a good thing.

    Reply
  314. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    Eleven Days And Counting~!!

    Reply
  315. Astro said on November 19th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston “reunite”… but only in the pages of In Touch magazine

    http://www.gossipcop.com/brad-pitt-and-jennifer-aniston-reunite-but-only-in-the-pages-of-in-touch-magazine/

    Reply
  316. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    Yep Astro, i don’t expect Jennifer to take Brad back as a husband, but as a friend most likely. Once a cheater , always a cheater, and one can forgive but never forget. Brad’s history before Jen was love em , grow tired of em and leave em. Except he married Jen. I think if Jolie hadn’t come along and waged a battle strategy with help of Geyer and James to discredit Jen, and convince Brad he was not being an unfaithful husband, Brad and Jen would still be the Golden Couple of HW, and happy together. Now karma is kicking both Angie and Brad in the butt, deservedly so.@Astro:

    Reply
  317. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    According to US Magazine, an insider told that Angie has been using Crystal Meth recently. That explains a lot!! But it was obvious to anyone who looked at the photos of her with her OWL pupils. CM does that to one yano.

    Reply
  318. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    Brad Pitt’s production company, Plan B, and Reliance BIG Entertainment are joining forces to create a film version of the video game Dark Void, THR reports.

    The firms have the rights to the game and plan to develop it into a feature film. Although no writers have been signed to the project yet, both companies say could be a potential starring vehicle for Brad.

    The Capcom third-person shooter game focuses on a cargo pilot who crashes into the Bermuda Triangle and lands in a parallel universe full of aliens thought to be extinct.

    How wonderful! Brad’s making a movie with a perfect role for Angie…the Alien.

    Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/#ixzz0XLw6fnYQ

    Reply
  319. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    http://glosslip.com/

    Just yesterday, Australian Senator, Nicholas (Nick) Xenophon has called for a Senate inquiry into Scientology.

    The Senator presented horrific stories that were sent to him by ex Scientology members, Aaron Saxton, Carmel Underwood, Paul Schofield, Anna and Dean Detheridge and Kevin Mackey.

    Xenophon stated,

    that the ex members claim that Scientology is an abusive, manipulative, violent and criminal organisation, and that criminality is condoned at the highest levels and thatand said he is seeing a worldwide pattern of abuse and criminality.

    The Senator’s presentaion was well researched with highlights on the cult’s many abuses and their tax exemption status.
    Click the following links to watch Part One and Part Two on YouTube.
    For the transcript listed on the Parliament of Australia website, click here.

    Reply
  320. anom said on November 19th, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    @guest1:
    @Tamara:
    before you waste some of the print not all but some.
    brad has screw looses always has he likes 3 somes with a 2nd man. brad has always had a thing for a foster bros & it is reciprecal. yawn yawn to their actions to cover it all.
    ange is a lezbot isn’t she or was?
    with brad he got a huge painting done depecting himself not as himself & some-one he was seeing. she didn’t like his lies so he changed the painting of the woman & gave it to an engagement present to another. he called himself bennifer then brange. that relationship actually broke up 2 yrs before the official split. he slept with an ex who got pregnant jennifer being the bitch that she is hit the red carpet & told the press a baby was coming. yes take-over even in the womb. how frightning for anybody that is pregnant a press conferance to say your baby is being taken from you. no there was no beautiful baby talk just take-over of the womb for a career. jennifer than feigned suicide & brad stayed for the press for 2 years, a very weak weak man.
    so all those interviews & comments are an embarassing act that covers up how truely cold & vain brad is.
    the irony is his press is fatherhood & sex when he is useless at both.
    jennifer could not believe that angelina would take her on. there is nothing cute about jennifer just a cold & cruel creature.
    he’s like michael jackson & various others. & like those others he hates women. a gay man trapped in the 50’s yet everybody else not caring. VAIN.

    Reply
  321. Ms Agatha said on November 19th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    Narcissism : The one quality that unites everybody in the film industry, whether you’re an actor, a producer, a director, or a studio executive

    Braddie and Angie : Dance Macabre . Good luck Brick .

    You want out ?
    TIP: Don’t enrage the narcissist in your life. He or she will make you pay. Stay calm and plan your exit. Don’t give in to ‘letting it all out’. Narcissists don’t forget and they like revenge. Your ‘outing’ of him or her adds to his narcissistic injury. A narcissist needs to look good in front of others and you gain nothing by proving he is not the best, smartest, wealthiest, most capable person he wants to be seen as.

    Reply
  322. Pattyanne said on November 19th, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    Why Ms Aggie, sounds as if you know our Angie Jo….lol. You are so right in your description of a narcissist. I’ve met a couple, and it’s dead on. Tred lightly, and praise them as you back slowly away, then turn and run like Ell.

    I had a couple of photos of Bobble headed AJ you might want to look at posted somewhere…..now let me see, where did i post those?@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  323. Ms Agatha said on November 19th, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    LOL… good to see you Patty :) well… don’t forget Hollywood Narcissist are a special species … you know a HW narcissist … you know it all …lol

    Reply
  324. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 5:42 am

    looks like a Disney vs. Twilight war. yawn. well, box office #’s show who’s the real winner, Miley

    Reply
  325. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 7:56 am

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/brad_angelina_kids_apples_france/mikewalker/64475

    Enquirer: Brangie calm while kids cause havoc in the house.

    Reply
  326. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTgyaxVQFFI&feature=player_embedded
    $cientology promotes violent murder of psychiatrists, as seen in ‘07 event. pls send this to media outlets

    Reply
  327. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 8:59 am

    @Pattyanne:

    hmm, i’ve heard that the contract’s only 5 yrs.

    Reply
  328. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 9:00 am

    http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/zac-efron-and-vanessa-hudgens-pal-slams-breakup-story-20091911

    Vanessa Hudgens leaking stories to Us Weekly? A “pal” (read: Hudgens herself) told them that she and Zac Efron are “still together”.

    Reply
  329. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    found this BI on Buzzfoto:
    “This married/aging actress has put up with a lot throughout her celebrity marriage. She’s practically raised the kids on her own, dealt with scandals and cheating and still managed to put on a happy face on the red carpet. Within this next year, she plans to finally leave her husband and make the divorce public. The current final straw? Not other women or drugs, but an addiction to World of Warcraft. We kid you not.”

    Reply
  330. Kate said on November 20th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @mooki:
    Angie to Shiloh “It is always better to ask than just helping yourself.”

    Lol, I have to chuckle at that, does that mean Angelina rang Jen up and asked permission to borrow her husband?

    There are two parents here and two toddlers, why was Shiloh left unattended to pull and entire cart of apples down onto the floor?

    Really pathetic damage control but I am sure some are melting with , “awww how cute that is”..if you are one of them, just remember that the time it took for one of them to turn their back and walk a few feet away and let her do this, is the same amount of time it took for Adam Walsh to be snatched.

    I knew a parent that lost a child like this, in a grocery store in much the same way. pay attention to your children Angie or take security with you (cough cough) lol…or at least one of those 12 nannies..

    Mike Walker, have you no shame? Isn’t it pretty dark up there?

    Reply
  331. Kate said on November 20th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    @mooki:
    Who do you think that is ?

    Reply
  332. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    David Duchovny and Tea Leone ? She’s put up with his sexual addiction and other’s slip ups from his vowels, seems fitting to me.

    Reply
  333. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @Kate:

    obviously Tom and Katie

    Reply
  334. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    http://www.intouchweekly.com/2009/11/nicoles_rushed_to_the_hospital.php

    somehow I don’t buy that Nicole Richie was rushed to the hospital because of “pneumonia”

    Reply
  335. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    i don’t think David’s on the computer playing a dumb sci-fi game… he loves the porn.

    Reply
  336. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    But they named one of their children “Kid”….and Tom and Katie have one child, so Katie isn’t raising their “kids” alone. Bella and (forgot his name) are nearly grown. Back to David, he has a penchant for addiction, i’m sticking with him in this.@mooki:

    Reply
  337. pickwick said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @mooki:
    I heard it was the old standby “exhaustion”.
    At least Misha Barton tried to come up with something a little more original with all the stuff about her wisdom teeth.

    Reply
  338. pickwick said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    @mooki:
    Does Zac really date….girls?
    I’m not sure I believe it.

    Reply
  339. pickwick said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    @mooki:
    They got a LOT of mileage out of that dumb market trip in France. They released the photo months ago and now we get the charming story.
    I really doubt they went to the grocery store twice.

    Reply
  340. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    @pickwick:

    Where is this pic? Can’t see it on JJ – what is the world coming to?!

    Reply
  341. pickwick said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Paul Newman was a class act.
    He REALLY gave money to charity. Without all the free travel and other perks thrown in.

    I was watching a U2 video today and it was for a song that apparently had gone with some AJ movie. I think the video woman tomb raider. It got me to thinking that Bono and Edge are both married with children and you don’t see the trips to ‘Toys R Us’ and the grocery stores and pet stores with the calls to the paps ahead of time. I’ve never seen Bono’s children. And he loves to give money to charity and he does stuff for the UN. But he doesn’t sell his kids for the cash.

    Reply
  342. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    True, and it was Jennifer Aniston who introduced Brad to Bono and got him interested in aid for refugees. In fact, she and Brad made a trip to Ethiopia for that purpose, during which Jen fell in love with an orphan, however, Brad was against adopting at that time.

    http://www.aegis.com/news/ads/2004/AD042308.html@pickwick:

    Reply
  343. pickwick said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    I have heard the rumors about Jake G for years now. I didn’t know he was in a committed relationship. It is horrible that he and his partner would be expected to hide that in this day and time. I keep thinking we have evolved past all that and then I hear something like that.
    I wish gay actors and singers could just be who they are. And I wish female actors and singers weren’t forced by their publicists to be photographed half-naked with their legs spread or grab a stripper pole.
    I wish a lot of things but I guess none of them are going to happen.

    Reply
  344. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    Sorry if this pops up twice, but my first attempt did not appear on this blog, so here goes again.

    Bona has been doing benefit programs as well as other activities to help the AIDs effort in Ethiopia for ages, especiall efforts to assist the AIDs orphans. It was Jennifer Aniston who first introduced Brad Pitt to Bono, and went to Ethiopia with Brad to help in some way. There was no huge PR release, it was a relatively quiet humanitarian effort. While there, Jen fell in love with an AIDs orphan, but Brad wasn’t up to adopting at that time. Strange how time changes things where Brad is concerned.

    http://www.aegis.com/news/ads/2004/AD042308.html

    Reply
  345. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    How true about Bono. He’s a great humanitarian who has worked tirelessly, and consistantly with the AIDs epidemic in Africa. In fact, Jennifer Aniston introduced Brad Pitt to Bono ages ago, and Brad and Jen traveled to Ethopia on a humanitarian trip during which Jen visited an orphanage. While there it’s said Jen “fell in love” with an AIDs orphan whom she wanted to adopt, however Brad wasn’t up to adopting at that time. Strange how he’s changed isnt’ it? … lol
    http://www.aegis.com/news/ads/2004/AD042308.html
    @pickwick:

    Reply
  346. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @pickwick:

    exactly (he’s gayer than xmas). Vanessa must have a really close relationship w/ her PR people.

    Reply
  347. mooki said on November 20th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    in Miley news:

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hBAjHrpxCBIazm9pWDC4Yx61z84Q
    Judge dismisses Miley Cyrus ’slant eyes’ suit (this smells of a Disney payout)

    http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/20/miley-cyrus-concert-the-show-must-go-on/
    after one crew member is killed on her tourbus, Miley performs @ her concert, not issuing a statement. Disney probably didn’t want a Gloria Estefan situation on their hands w/ their cash cow

    Reply
  348. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Okay, it popped up thrice…argh. At least it finally showed up…lol

    Reply
  349. I'm on the bidet said on November 20th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    I don’t suppose this is germane to anything, but does anyone notice some odd visual parallels here?

    AJ statue:
    http://www.bigoye.com/specials/Look-Angelina-Jolie-breastfeeding-statue/157663

    Octomom photo:
    http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/20/octomom-nayda-suleman-pet-puppy-shopping/

    Note to self: get off bidet, build space ship, get off planet.

    Reply
  350. stinky-inky said on November 20th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    Interesting spin on the billy goat beard:

    Pitt, 45, is likely “marking a transition or marking a new stage in his career,” says Dr. Alan Peterkin, psychiatrist and author of One Thousand Beards: A Cultural History of Facial Hair.

    Angelina Jolie’s man — who has often sported facial hair — also may be “tired of being a part of one of the most beautiful couples in the world. He wants to try a new look.”

    http://www.usmagazine.com/stylebeauty/news/stylist-to-brad-pitt-lose-the-beard-20092011

    Reply
  351. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    I thought the goatee was for a future role he is playing. I’ve since forgotten the name of the film though.@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  352. stinky-inky said on November 20th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I thought the next project was Moneyball, which is now in development hell as there were problems between producer and director. I think BP was inked to play Billy Beane, but I don’t think a billy goatee would be part of that role. Maybe it was another role?

    Reply
  353. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 7:24 pm

    I believe the film is titled “The Lost City of Z” and he’s set to play Col. Percy Harrison Fawcett, who wore a goatee such as the one Brad has grown.

    Reply
  354. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    I suppose the goatee’s survival depends upon which film he does immediately; If Moneyball takes off finally, then he’ll have to shave it off i’d say, if not, then he’s set for Lost City of Z

    Reply
  355. Pattyanne said on November 20th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    http://www.pittwatch.com/speculation-continues-about-brad-pitt-and-the-lost-city-of-z/

    Speculation continues about Brad Pitt and “The Lost City of Z”
    October 6, 2009 by Sherry
    28 Comments
    There’s been a lot of discussion about Brad Pitt’s bushy beard lately. Some people think it looks great, some people aren’t keen on it but still think he looks just fine, and a lot of people flat-out hate it. I fall into the middle category; I’m not crazy about his beard but I don’t think it changes the fact that he’s a seriously good-looking man

    Reply
  356. Ms Agatha said on November 20th, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    This is a largely speculative movie….nobody knows what happened to the guy Pitty is playing – he just disappeared and was never heard of – chasing dreams and failing. Maybe Pitty can follow his steps and gets lost lol

    Reply
  357. Kate said on November 21st, 2009 at 1:28 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Moneyball looks like it is about ready to go. Sorkin is adapting still and they have not announced what came out of the meetings these last two weeks Webb and Miller, but one of them will most likely be the new director.

    Brad is producing LCZ so if James Gray is not ready with the adaption (and apparently he is still working on it) then he has some flexibility there to take other projects while waiting, Does not look as though anyone else has been cast. However on Nov 15 it was still listed as in the development stage, and on Nov 17 it was updated to pre-production, so maybe this one will go before Moneyball. Considering he still has the beaded beard that would be my guess.

    Interesting timing on “Fight Club” being released on Blue Ray. He certainly is not slowing down in the production area picking up new films pretty frequently.

    So, if Bradley is jetting off to Brazil, and Ang has to start The Tourist , (filming), February, that does not leave a whole lot of time for staggering the films, does it? She may be required in January to prep as she did for Salt. Sounds like a solid plan to dodge the bullet of “The Untold Story of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie”

    lol

    Reply
  358. Ms Agatha said on November 21st, 2009 at 8:16 am

    @Kate:
    …The Tourist is shot in Europe ? And he most likely is in Brazil ? And the kids are where ? …just saying ..lol

    Reply
  359. stinky-inky said on November 21st, 2009 at 9:06 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Makes sense. Still, it does look icky.

    Reply
  360. Kate said on November 21st, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    At the Chateau with Rexxy and Voxxy , where else? lol

    Reply
  361. Ms Agatha said on November 21st, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    @Kate:
    hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahah… forgot about THAT ! …more hahahaaha

    Reply
  362. ЗИКСИ said on November 22nd, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    “да, новость пошла по инету и распространяется со старшной силой”

    Reply
  363. txti said on November 22nd, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    да, вот и у нас начались увольнения.. говорят, что после нового года еще круче будет

    Reply
  364. Джэй Ди Лаб said on November 22nd, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    Красиво написано, мне понравилось.

    Reply
  365. picoturbo said on November 23rd, 2009 at 12:57 am

    “Интересная заметка”

    Reply
  366. Банник said on November 23rd, 2009 at 2:04 am

    Сегодня буду болеть за ЦСКА ! Вперёд, Россия ! ;) также, жду не дождусь, 10 декабря. когда Реал против нашего Зенита….

    Reply
  367. MyWarez said on November 23rd, 2009 at 6:55 am

    Случайно увидел. Не ожидал.

    Reply
  368. Медик Лекарь said on November 23rd, 2009 at 9:58 am

    Спасибо большое. Есть о чем задуматься .

    Reply
  369. Pirate said on November 24th, 2009 at 3:26 am

    На сегодняшний день рынок предлагает широкий спектр товаров и услуг, учитывающий самые разнообразные вкусы и потребности. . Описание товаров, советы профессионалов на нашем сайте помогут вам сформировать собственное мнение о сфере современных товаров и услуг.
    Ваш сайт в опере не очень то корректо показывается, а так все отлично! спасибки вам за умные мысли!
    По правде говоря, сначала не очень то до конца понял, но перечитав второй раз дошло – спасибо!
    Вах-вах-вах
    “Полезного много нашла для себя”

    Reply
  370. Ритм said on November 24th, 2009 at 5:30 am

    Респект.
    “здорово!”
    Чёрт возьми! Круто!Вы Сами ответили.Беру в цитник! Смысл жизни и всё остальное. Решено.Без шуток.
    Блог супер, буду рекомендовать друзьям!
    Отличный пост, прочитав несколько статей на эту тему понял, что всё таки не посмотрел с другой стороны, а пост как-то очень заинтересовал.

    Reply
  371. Dialearn said on November 25th, 2009 at 5:19 am

    Спасибо, за хороший материал

    Reply
  372. XXmovie said on November 25th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    “Прямо даже не верится”

    Reply
  373. Housing said on November 25th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    Пост навел на размышления *ушел много думать* …

    Reply
  374. Uakino said on November 25th, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    большое спасибо!Взяла себе тоже-пригодится.

    Reply
  375. Айкидо said on November 26th, 2009 at 4:27 am

    “Работай с умом, а не до ночи”

    Reply
  376. Админ said on November 26th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Респект.

    Reply
  377. вебмастер said on November 26th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Полностью с Вами согласна, примерно неделю назад написала про этоже в своем блоге! Представляете :) я хотел спросить, может ссылками обменяемся? e-mail в комментарии.

    Reply
  378. betty said on November 26th, 2009 at 9:43 pm

    I have being praying for those children since she first got them and still pray that they come out OK. I don’t forsee suck luck for AJ. or Brad because ‘what goes around comes around’ and ‘you cannot build happiness over someone’s misery’. It won’t work. I knew there were together since before the movie MMS and they both didn’t take in consideration Brad’s serious vows to another woman. Sometimes things happen but you don’t go adding children to your miserable life to mask some real issues lying under this relationship. Those poor children being dragged to airports in the middle of the night or early mornings doesn’t cut it. For what? A few minutes of satisfying sex? ..and the other thing, I think they are also into drugs. How else would you explain leaving a beautiful woman for another beautiful woman unless that woman got somehow the ability to adquire drugs, leave the country and go to another where they are more leviant about this issue. No the US, here you will be arrested here or you will pay the consequences. I believe those flying days were use to ’smoke’ and who knows what else. I hope I ‘m wrong for the sake of those children.

    Reply
  379. Popizdavali said on November 27th, 2009 at 1:32 am

    Интересная статейка, автору респект, гы могу помоч с развитием, пиши icq 2225456

    Reply
  380. Force said on November 27th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    “Мало кто может похвастаться такой смекалкой, как у автора”

    Reply
  381. Вінпрайс said on November 27th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    С чистым юмором.

    Reply
  382. Swarovski said on November 27th, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    Пробуйте, попытайтесь))

    Reply
  383. MooZle said on November 28th, 2009 at 3:28 am

    “Прямо даже не верится”

    Reply
  384. Alif said on November 28th, 2009 at 4:05 am

    @betty:
    Yes, they all need our prayers. It just might keep them from being a huge problem for society later.
    And of course, I hope that Braddie and Mangelina will have deep, deep pockets, because their future therapy bills will be huge!

    On the other hand, it might be drops in the bucket compared to what Brangie is spending now. JMO!

    Reply
  385. Монтажник said on November 28th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Класс! Афтару респект!

    Reply
  386. Радиотехник said on November 28th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    “замечательные посты”

    Reply
  387. КАЙ said on November 28th, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    Интересно и позновательно, а будет еще что-то по этой теме?

    Reply
  388. Raskladyshka said on November 29th, 2009 at 12:01 am

    вот толкьо есть ли смысл..

    Reply
  389. купить мешки said on November 29th, 2009 at 5:57 am

    Вы всегда публикуете только лучшую информацию. У вас просто супер блог. Спасибо

    Reply
  390. Универсальный said on November 29th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    По моему у Вас украли эту статью и поместили на другом сайте. Я её уже видела.

    Reply
  391. vowhede said on December 1st, 2009 at 10:34 am

    I want to buy the original or the one that is made in china. whatever that is better.. does the iphone features all working in philippines? and what does unlocked iphone means?

    ________________
    [url=http://unlockiphone22.com/]unlock iphone 3g[/url]

    Reply
  392. TurdeMonacos said on December 4th, 2009 at 6:45 am

    Часто поиск не дает результата. А жаль…

    Reply
  393. vowhede said on December 5th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Can you still use the internet on the iphone, even if you do not use an O2 sim.

    ________________
    [url=http://unlockiphone22.com]unlock iphone[/url]

    Reply
  394. vowhede said on January 4th, 2010 at 5:31 am

    I need to know how to make more money with Forex, investing less money for more profits.
    [url=http://forexrobot-review.info]best forex software[/url]

    Reply
  395. florin said on February 9th, 2011 at 2:56 am

    ma numesc florin mihai si vin cu o mare rugaminte la dumneavoastra. vin sarbatorile de paste, iar noi nu avem ce pune pe masa . tata nu lucreaza doar mama, si lucreaza la matura pe strada in frig si ger pentru 500 de lei pe luna.tata este operat la picior are 2 tije in picior, si doua operatii la picior.din banii acestia mama trebuie sa plateasca datoriile la magazin , datoriile la oameni care ne mai dau bani imprumut, si noi numai ramanem cu nimic.va cer ajutorul ca sa ne ajutati si pe noi cu ce puteti ca sa punem cate ceva de sarbatori pe masa. va trimit acest mesaj de la calculatorul unui vecin care ne mai ajuta si dansul din cand in cand.va rugam va rugam din tot sufletul sa ne ajutati cu ce puteti ca sa ne facem si noi sarbatorile de paste ca orice om.Am vrea si noi ca orice om sa avem si noi un cozonac si un ou rosu. dar daca nu avem nu putem face nimic. Dumnezeu sa va binecuvinteze si multa sanatate celor ce citesc. va las numarul meu de telefon sa ma sunati daca vreti sa ma ajutati 0731806200 va multumesc

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Meta