IUC Exclusive: Brangelina Tell All Gets US Weekly Cover Story

Posted on November 11th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

usweeklycover Everyone should pick up this week's issue. Not to be missed!

  • 116 Comments
  • Tags:
  1. the bitch said on November 11th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    What about Stephen Huvane spreading lies about Angelina ?????
    Because Jennifer is so sweet and inocent right ????
    What about all those PR romances ??
    IT´S ALL ANGELINA´S FAULT , YEAH ….. I REMIND YOU IT WAS BRAD WHO LEFT JENNIFER NOT ANGELINA

    Brad fears Angelina will cheat with a woman ???? Haven´t you said he brings a female stripper to get her happy .. jajajjajajajajajajaj

    Well right now people is saying Brad and Angelina adopt an orphan so ……………..

    I DON´T SEE THEM BREAKING UP ANYTIME SOON…… DESPITE YOUR HATE.

    Reply
  2. pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Sounds good to me, i’ll pick up a copy while i’m out and about today. I get so tired of people bashing “poor jen”, that i’m wondering Ian, if you can find and post that 2005 or 2006 photo Jen shot with just the long, sheer, black shaul under a waterfall. Brad was at that shoot….gorgeous and sexy as all Ell!

    Reply
  3. Tamara said on November 11th, 2009 at 8:32 am

    No, I think I’ll just wait for the book. Ian, you said the Star mag was full of lies, are you saying then that this mag is full of truth?? Did they interview you before they published this one?

    Reply
  4. the bitch said on November 11th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Jennifer aniston lovers are crazy and obssesed about a divorce that happened 5 years ago……..

    Reply
  5. Joanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    I was getting worried after reading popeaters and star magazines version of your story. I thought you were going to trash Aniston and give another ‘poor me’ Jolie story. I once again have hope for this book.

    Reply
  6. mooki said on November 11th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    @mooki:

    and he’s gonna be on Ellen today pimping out his daughter. should be interesting….

    Reply
  7. bitchy said on November 11th, 2009 at 10:56 am

    Lets me clear, AngieHO and Bradders are the ones that keep this shit going. They need the triangle and the kids(one every year) to be relevant in HW. Jen tried to move on but these bitches lie and lie so she had to get in the game. Now that she is the game these bitches (Holie and Brad) are upsett.

    Be clear — krama is a motherfucker.

    Reply
  8. the bitch said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    This woman Aniston is someone because of Brad and Angelina , the victim part suits her very well .

    Anyone Ian is being payed by Stephen Huvane soooooooooooooo ………

    Reply
  9. Tamara said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:15 am

    @the bitch:
    Well, its been 50 years since Elizabeth Taylor stole Eddie Fisher from Debbie Reynolds and people are still talking about it, including the principal players, so I don’t think this one is going away any time soon either. Lest you forget, Jennifer Aniston is America’s Sweetheart and Angie is the maneater from hell. Brad isn’t the first husband AJ has stolen and he won’t be the last. Jennifer is NOT famous because of Brad and Angie for eff’s sake, she had and has her own career, and you know what, at least her movies make money, AJ’s movies FLOP because no one can stand her and people aren’t going to spend their hard earned money on one of her horrendous movies!!

    Reply
  10. bitchy said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Jen had a career before JolieHO became relevant and she will have one long after these two fuckers cut one another down. So if Jen has to pay to keep these loons that believe Brangelina cool-aid to be in the game so be it.

    They are soulmates, they are the second coming so why do you need to put Jen down. Why Brad, why!

    Honey Jen gave you to the HO, so live and let live. Jen now enjoy a man with a a big dick. So, Brad leave Jen alone and look after your Ho and kids. Wait, are they yours? Remember, the HO fucked Clint Eastwood.

    Reply
  11. Tamara said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:17 am

    @the bitch:
    Angie is that you? Don’t you have something more important to do, like illegally buying more kids from some third world country, or maybe some heroin den is waiting for you to make a new internet movie, the last one was so very entertaining we can’t wait for the installment.

    Reply
  12. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:23 am

    Looks like Ian gave US Weekly some infos (maybe an excerpt) because otherwise how could they know what is in the book?

    By the way did you see In Touch Weekly`s side bar:

    Jen’s friends trash Angelina
    Jennifer Aniston allows her pals to dish dirt on Angelina Jolie for a new tell-all.

    Sweet Jen hm? What a bitch! How the hell could JEN`s friends know Jolie since I doubt they spend time with her!

    Reply
  13. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:35 am

    For more on Jolie and Pitt – including how they fight “like cats and dogs,” the truth behind Pitt’s “secret meetings” with Jennifer Aniston and why one explosive tell-all predicts Pitt and Jolie will split by “Christmas 2010″ – pick up the new issue of Us Weekly today!

    So Ian! Didn`t you say that Jolie and Pitt split in the spring of 2009? So what is it? Were you just wrong AGAIN?

    Reply
  14. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Look what I found! I guess that sums it up pretty well!

    Meanwhile, I’m kind of curious why Angelina got so many covers this week. She hasn’t given any interviews in a while, she’s not promoting anything, and there really isn’t any new information about her, truly. One theory I have for this media saturation is that both Ian Halperin and Andrew Morton (both of whom are about to release books on Angelina soon) are starting to “leak” to the tabloids, trying to get some early buzz for their books. We’ll see.

    Magazine covers thanks to Cover Awards.

    Reply
  15. Tamara said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    @mia:
    Mia !! You make that sound like a BAD thing….HA!

    Reply
  16. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Well it definately IS a bad thing! You have to be quite desperate to promote a book by leaking to tabloids! That just shows that Ian is in the same “league” as those trash mags! Very fitting indeed!

    @Tamara:

    Reply
  17. stinky-inky said on November 11th, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    Is a major announcement in the works? Practically every pub has something about the brangeliffer triangle on the cover!

    Reply
  18. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    Just like they did for the last FIVE years! As long as it sells this nonsense will continue – fueled by everyone who buys those trash mags!

    Reply
  19. Lizzy said on November 11th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    Finally, a website with sane people who can have a real conversation about this sham (not necessarily this thread)
    I have yet to come across a Brangelina posting where someone can provide me with an explanation as to why these people have such a loyal following. It boggles my mind that there are individuals who have not seen through this PR veil. I could get into a million things but I think I’ll save it for when the book comes out. As for this post, a few thoughts,
    The only people who need this triangle to continue are BP&AJ. Without this love triangle they would fade into obscurity and not be half of the “mega-stars” that they are now. Jennifer on the other hand can get more press from dating new guys. BP&AJA only have the Jen drama to keep people excited in them. My belief is that AJ occasionally will put out these stories to stay relevant bc the only other choice she has is to parade her fake family around with BP, who she cannot stand. I have yet to hear an explanation from a Brangelina fan as to why the family is only photographed when there is bad press or something to promote. No other couple does this, they use the paparazzi even though their fans think they love privacy. They use the charities they participate in. They use their children. Someone please explain to me how they can be defended by a sane person!

    Reply
  20. Whatever said on November 11th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    Mia, get your own blog. Why do you insist on dominating this one. I get so borrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrred with you.

    Reply
  21. Kate said on November 11th, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    @Tamara:
    Thats true, I remember Brad laughing in a interview and saying his wife made more money than he did.

    Reply
  22. Astro said on November 11th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    I can describe to you the movie when the book comes out. We will have some noise, everybody will talk about that, after two or three weeks, nobody will remember the book, Brangelina will say nothing about the book and they will remain together for a long time. That’s it!. No sorprise!!!…Sorry!

    Reply
  23. mooki said on November 11th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/jon-voight-confirms-hes-reconciled-with-angelina-jolie-20091111

    well looky here, Jon Voight blabs that he and Angie have reconciled…

    Reply
  24. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    @mia:

    But mia your idol does that every hour of every day of her life, so what does that make her? I think you know. You’re just going to have to start dealing with it.

    Reply
  25. Canuck said on November 11th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Wow, lots of Nervous Nellies on here today.

    Btw “The Bitch”, the basic truth is that it’s the woman who ultimately says yes or no. Angelina obviously said yes to a married man. Hence the nickname “The Ho”.

    Reply
  26. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Care to elaborate? When did Jolie talk to the tabs? You know giving an interview to MAGAZINES such as Vogue for movie promotion purpose is something different – Jen does that TOO! Hell that reminds me that Jen has been the tabloid cover queen for as long as she was on “Friends” – pretty much for ten years! It only got less when Huvane insulted Us Weekly! That pretty much put an end to their monthly Jen covers!

    Reply
  27. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @mia:

    It’s fueled purely by Brad and principally Angelina babe, but yes the mags do pretty well out of it too. And they’ll do just as well with trashing her when they split too. All she is is a highly marketable story to them, tabloids do not have any loyalty to anyone. The biggest mistake she ever made was thinking she could control the press, it’s going to come back to bite her in the ass in a major way. The harder they come, the harder they fall, I think is what they call it.

    So Ian – was one of the nasty rumours that Angelina spread about Jen was that she was gay? I assume the main one was that she was too selfish to have children? Just wondering.

    Reply
  28. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    @mia:

    Sweetheart, if I’ve told you once I’ve told you a hundred times, the stories about Ange on the cover and the inside pages of the rags are leaked by her and her alone. The source is HER or her PR. Angelina has made her career on the back of PR, she works that publicity like a truck-stop hooker with a $1000 a day habit to feed. Everyone in the media industry knows she is the creation of PR alone and the majority of it comes down to her own devices. If you want to keep believing the Angelina-spoon-fed nonsense that “it is all the work of the dastardly Huvane wah wah!!!!” then it is up to you. I’m just trying to explain to you how stupid you look.

    Reply
  29. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Em Ian made that rumor up you naive thing! And as for having kids – well she does NOT have kids – who knows why – a fact that never stopped her telling everyone that she will definately have them! Just when? Maybe she thinks age will increase her chances? Who knows?

    If I was as cynical as you Keane I would suggest the following: Just grab a underage mexican poor girl, offer her 20.000 dollars and snatch her baby away the moment it is born! Voila worked for Sharon Stone.

    Reply
  30. Reaction said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    If this is true then the book will be a suck up to angelina and brad?

    A commenter on justjared has read the article from us weekly (they say they did) and said the following:

    the real lou @ 11/11/2009 at 1:00 pm Just so everyone knows…..Us Weeklies Cover is mis-leading to say the least.They “break down” Ian’s book THEN goes on to tell what THEIR own investigation found to be true.In a nutshell….. they prove all of Ian’s claims to be BS.They even have a 2 page story on the Jolie-Pitt’s LOVING and HAPPY life and their home life in France.I read the story at Barnes and Noble this morning.

    So if this is true what this commenter is saying why is ian making publicity for us weekly?

    Reply
  31. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Really so Jolie is leaking all those negative stories about her? Well she must be the most machochistic person om earth then!

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  32. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @mia:

    Sweetheart you are hilarious! You have the whole world upside down and you are the most obstinate mule I have ever encountered. No Ian did not invent the story about Jen being gay, Angelina did and got one of her associates to leak it to Ian. And no I doubt Jen will buy some babies off some desperate, impoverished women like Angelina has. She has a little bit more class I think.

    Reply
  33. pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    It’s called DAMAGE CONTROL pre break up announcement :-) @mia:

    Reply
  34. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @mia:

    Oh my God mia if we’ve been through this once we’ve been through it a hundred times. Stories about a split aren’t negative if they paint Angelina as the wronged victim are they? They have split so they have to spin their way out of it somehow. Angelina’s angle is to accuse Brad of being a drunk and of course bring the usual scapegoat Jennifer Aniston back into the mix again as she has done all along. And say for example Angelina had lost a lot of weight because she had a serious drug habit or life-threatening illness contracted through say drug use for example, it would be smart to leak a story to the press saying she is on some extreme diet because she is so “insecure” or that she can’t eat because she is still grieving for her mother or the death of her relationship with Brad right? Or when she looked botox-ed out to the max at Cannes to leak a story about her use of some nonsense skin-pricking device which she apparently uses to maintain a youthful complexion rather than having an ounce of plastic surgery! Lol. It’s so bleeding obvious mia you’d have to be mentally challenged to not see it. Insert obvious loon-based comment/joke/insult/whatever of your choice.

    Reply
  35. Togi said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @Canuck:
    “Lots of Nervous Nellies on here today.” Ha ha! I was thinking much the same thing. And where did these NEW AJ supporters come from. ASTRO and MIA have been here a long time and I respect where they are coming from. But sheesh, The Bitch, I’m pretty sure there are more appropriate words to use than the “f” word! LOL

    Reply
  36. Togi said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @Astro:
    Astro, I HEART you! :-)

    Reply
  37. pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    It also worked for Angie three times as well@mia:

    Reply
  38. pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    For all the loons here today, there is hope~! If Angie does the movie Tourist with Johnny Depp, most likely she will repeat her behaviour with Brad during MAMS. Then you can all glory in a new triangle. Angie is as Angie is, a Ho with no concience or sense of morality. There are women and men like that, so be it. Glorifying her does nothing to change what she is. Hopefully one day she will receive the mental help she so desperately needs to function normally, but until that day, Angie plays by Angie’s rules.

    Reply
  39. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @pattyanne:

    Time to wake up! Millions and millions of men and women cheat on their spouses! When will you start telling them that they should just “function normal”?

    Reply
  40. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    If you believe the stories that Jolie is controlling- and I am NOT saying that she is not – why doesn`t she just continue talking about her troubled past like she used to do? In an interview situation she was able to say WHAT and TO WHOM and WHEN she wanted – she had total control over what got out – something she does NOT have if we consider your tabloid leaking theory! Tabloids just increased the backlash on her while simultaniously cashing in! So yes I buy that Jolie is a conrol freak and that is exactly why I DON“T buy your theory Keane!

    Reply
  41. Pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    So you admit Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt cheated on his marriage? Well that’s a step in the right direction, however, her mental issues are well documented, by her mother’s words, as well as her father’s pleas for her to seek help. There is nothing “wrong” with being ill, but there is something “wrong” with not seeking help for it, if not for herself, then for her children. Everything put out there now is part of Angie’s damage control plan for the big announcement of her breakup with her current partner. It’s simply the way it’s done in HW. Angie will go her way, as will Brad. Jennifer has nothing to do with it other than being the person who was damaged by the actions that broke up her marriage. To make her seem the bad guy is nonsense, but someone such as Angie would know that attack is the best defense. Time for the piper to be paid it seems. Can’t wait for my issue of the book to reach me Dec 3rd.@mia:

    Reply
  42. brangelina rajongó said on November 11th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Ian még a kinézeted is kockacukorért kiált.Ilyen ember csak hazugságokat állít. Brad és Angie nagyon boldogok együtt.Te irigyled tőlük a boldogságot? Az a legborzasztób hogy nagyon sok szennylap,mint az In Touch,Star,Life in Style a Te mocskos,hazug könyvedből mazsoláz már a megjelenés előtt.De Angiék olyan pert akasztanak a nyakadba,hogy még a kedved is elmegy a róluk szóló hazug hírek keltésétől.Számodra mitől aranyos Aniston? Ő egyáltalán nem tünik őszintének.Bradnek Angie az élete párja.

    Reply
  43. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    I have watched the tabloids splitting them up for the last FIVE years and you can bet your a.ss on the fact that this nonsense will continue for the next five years unless people stop buyng those trash mags!

    Reply
  44. Pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    Yes Mia, it’s been a long time coming. I have always felt they formed a Toxic Duo when they became partners, each being a better person without the other. Hopefully, the children will be the ones to benefit most from this separation. At least they won’t have to go through courts for a divorce.@mia:

    Reply
  45. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @mia:

    BECAUSE Mia, she does not want the world to be reminded that she was(/is) a major drug addict and brother-snogger of course!!!! She is a mother of 6 and selfless humanitarian nowadays yano, the video of her in the drugs den pre-plastic surgery does not exactly fulfil the brief!!!! Come on Mia you can’t be this stupid, no-one can. I’ve explained this to you a hundred times. Remember when Jolie went to the Oscars a few years ago and some interviewer reminded her of when she jumped into the pool at an Oscars do in her previous “wild child” days – she was pissed as hell!! That is not the image she wishes to project obviously.

    And Mia, you really are trying my patience with the “theory” rubbish. It’s not a flipping theory it is THE WAY IT WORKS. I work in the media mia and know plenty of journalists on national broadsheets, tabloids and magazines. How many do you know again? And you have the nerve to call ME naive?!!!! You’re so bloody hilarious, you’ll argue black is white and night is day until your dying day. What more can I say to you other than I’m telling you because I know that is how it works because this is what my friends and I do for a living!!!! If I were a nurse would you debate with me on how to correctly administer an injection? Will you ever accept that someone might know a bit more about something than you because they actually participate it in it real life, not just talk about it on a gossip blog.? I give up!

    Reply
  46. Reaction said on November 11th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Apperently the US Cover is misleading because inside the magazine us weekly is debunking ian. Their own investigation says otherwise and they say there is no truth to ian. So why is Ian making publicity for their story, i don’t understand that?

    Reply
  47. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    And I thought you work for “respectible” media like BBC! That`s hardly comapreable to the tabloids or is it? Apart from the fact that you don`t know Jolie so you can just speculate about her supposed tabloid leaks! That`s how it`s done? Well I don`t doubt that certain tabloid editors are in regular contact with “insiders” such as nannies and paying them handsomely for breaking their confidentially agreements!
    That doesn`t change the fact that NO relationship has WEEKLY high- and/or lowpoints like the tabloids want you to believe! But hell tabloids must be sold – and sold by one glance on the cover while walking by!
    And nothing sells better then a split/baby/pregnancy/fighting story especially if it involves Brabgelina and/or Jen!

    Reply
  48. Reaction said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Us
    “Angelina’s Cruel Lies”
    Ian Halperin’s new book, Brangelina: The Untold Story of Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie , has lots of claims, like: Angelina spread nasty rumors about her romantic rival Jen Aniston; a tipster says Angie was recently taking crystal meth; and Angelina and Brad are just one year from splitting. According to one of Halperin’s exes, who worked on Troy with Brad Pitt, but never saw Brad with Angie, “They’ve broken up so many times, it would make your head spin.” A limo driver says: “She has a temper like a cobra.” Halperin claims that in 1998, Angie was so distraught that she hired a hit man to kill her. LOL. Also, Brad met a Sudanese model named Amma at a Darfur event and they flirted, fueling fears of cheating. An employee and the Dorchester Hotel in London overheard Shiloh refer to a nanny as “mommy.” And, Halperin says, “It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if the two were broken up by Christmas 2010.” On the other hand, Us reports that Angie and Brad are enjoying “a peaceful French life” : A recent visitor says Angie was in the kitchen doing dishes while the kids were running outside; she could watch from the window. The kids have free reign on the estate’s 880 acre grounds; Pax and Maddox run around for hours pointing their fingers at each other like guns. Shiloh and Zahara bond with the ponies and donkeys on the estate and “revel in golf cart rides with Daddy.” An insider says: “Every time the cart goes over a bump, Shiloh squeals with delight.”

    Reply
  49. Kate said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    Truck stop hooker, lol that must be where that person got the inspiration for that Vid on You Tube, Cheater Cheater, You Dumbed Down White Trash Ho! that is one of the funniest You Tube vids I have ever seen on Brangelina! Hilarious.

    Reply
  50. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    @mia:

    No Mia, I work for “respectable” broadcasters, not “respectible”. And no Mia there is not a vast amount of difference between broadsheets and the tabloid press. And yes I have friends and work with people who are journalists on broadsheets and I have friends and work with people who are journalists on the tabloids, and I have friends who are freelance and work on both. They are basically two different styles, and they actually find the tabloid stuff harder. People labour under the misapprehension that there is a vast difference between “respectible” publications such as The Times and rags such as The Sun. That is in fact far from the truth and there is actually more similarities between them than differences nowadays. Broadsheets have become tabloidised (more pictures, celeb stories etc) in order to compete and the borders have been blurred. And besides, both The Times and The Sun are owned and controlled by the same person, Jolie’s chum Rupert Murdoch, there is no great difference. So here concludes my little lecture on the media for your benefit Mia. Do us all a favour, do a media studies course or something, you’d save me a lot of time.

    And I don’t need to know Jolie to know she does what all other celebs and their PRs do, it is more than obvious about her coverage in the press. She is just better at it than all other celebrities, or has been recently. We’ll see how the next few years go. I have said before that she is the Max Clifford of the celebrity world (google him), and I will also says she is the Houdini of the PR world. She has got her ass out of one unbelievable amount of shit over the years, I’m not sure anyone has more skeletons to conceal than her. Not sure how much longer her tricks are going to be believed though. That smoke is looking mighty thin these days and those mirrors really could do with a polish. Keep sticking to your “the tabs make up everything about Jolie because it sells, it sells!” or the “it’s all the work of the dastardly Huvane” theory if you like though Mia. Gives us something to laugh at!

    Reply
  51. Canuck said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @Togi:
    I suppose that some of them must have googled Ian and ended up here.

    Reply
  52. Kate said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Because it is free publicity for his book. People will read it just to find out what is what. lol.

    Reply
  53. Pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Googling can be a scarey thing…LOL. I once googled “woman’s photo” to get something to paste with an article i’d read in Woman’s Day magazine. Guess what Google came up with? PORN~! YIKES! So, now i am much more explicit in what i google.@Canuck:

    Reply
  54. Pattyanne said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    Who was it who said, “Any sort of publicity is good publicity” ? either way, people are talking and talking about Ian’s book, Brangelina: Exposed. Soon it will be out, and we can read it for ourselves. @Kate:

    Reply
  55. Canuck said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Imagine what the owners of blogs and websites can see in their stats… the odd and twisted things that people search for that over time (once you have a lot of content) lead them to your site. LOL

    Ian… you should get SRRC to do a post using search terms that got people to your site, now that would be entertaining, hehehe

    Reply
  56. Kate said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    That is certainly not very good damage control. Anyone out there in this economy readintg that would see right through it, it sounds so staged, just like that People Magazine cover. Doing dishes ha! while the kids run around and squeal in delight, please. The more she hails herself as a regular mom, the more she will find herself being ripped apart. Seems the latest craze is actors coming clean and talking about their deepest and darkest secrets. Most publicist would have advised her to release the bad info before anyone else could, except she thinks she knows more than anyone else. They love to build stars up, and they love to tear them down, especially when they lie…

    As for 2010, sorry, when children are involved anyone can fake it for years and years and years. Does that mean they are really together. Just think about any couple that has tried to hide a break up for their status in the community where one has turned the other cheek. Does that mean they are really together?

    NO, can’t imagine Brad doing that for very long though, he looks pretty bad already. Maybe he has not reached his max of being miserable. Everyone has their breaking point.

    Reply
  57. mia said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    @Kate:

    Well Jolie DID tell most of her “dark secrets”. That`s exactly how you know about them! Her problem is that she has been TOO honest for her own good!

    Reply
  58. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    @mia:

    Mia, you are such a comedian – I’m in love with you!

    Reply
  59. froufrou said on November 11th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    angelina is about ready to trade mr. pitt in for mr. depp.

    Reply
  60. bitchy said on November 11th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Ian, why have they release the SALT previews now for a July release date?

    Reply
  61. stinky-inky said on November 11th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    @mia:
    Granted, the triangle is a selling tool the rags rely on–heavily. But all of them covering one angle or another at the same time? Are you telling there’s nothing out there on Gosselins, or Fergie and Josh, or Tomcat that’s worthy of one cover?

    Observe the tone of these articles. The tide has totally turned on AJ this week. Why or how, I don’t know. I would suspect that the books are part of it. But I would also wager that all of this is part of a publicity war between AJ and BP prior to the “please respect our privacy at this difficult time” announcement.

    Reply
  62. mooki said on November 11th, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/john-travolta-tears-up-on-ellen-20091111

    Travolta on Ellen recap by Us Weekly. Note the lone Scilon in the comment section

    Reply
  63. Kate said on November 11th, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    I would not be surprised by that either.

    Reply
  64. Kate said on November 11th, 2009 at 10:03 pm

    Looks like Moneyball may take off after all, getting closer and closer.

    Reply
  65. Ms Agatha said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    @Reaction:
    Quote “A recent visitor says Angie was in the kitchen doing dishes while the kids were running outside; she could watch from the window. The kids have free reign on the estate’s 880 acre grounds; Pax and Maddox run around for hours pointing their fingers at each other like guns. Shiloh and Zahara bond with the ponies and donkeys on the estate ”

    Ahhhhh The Sound of Music …..The Trapp Family ? Mother washing dishes ? Ponies and donkeys ? hahaahahahahahahahahahahahah stop poking my ribs and get your elbow out of my potato salad hahaha

    Reply
  66. Ms Agatha said on November 11th, 2009 at 11:36 pm

    Much bad prez coming down on them …. if you ask me… he seems to be mentally relieved ….the man barely can’t wait ’til it’s finally over …. already started morphing into a poser rasta lol

    Reply
  67. Alif said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:54 am

    Some years back the only celebrities reported to have bad odor were Madonna (her siblings affectionately called her “Smells”), and Brad Pitt.

    Did they start a trend? It seems that more celebs are being adopting this imagery. Hmmm!

    If it continues, PEOPLE will now have an annual SEXIEST STINKER ALIVE! issue.
    The Jon Voight reconciliation story is aptly timed, imo! More and more manipulative stories are probably in the works.

    Personally, I don’t care if Brangelina doesn’t split.
    That’s because I’d hate to think of who’s next in their search and destroy mission in life. jmo!

    Reply
  68. Alif said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:56 am

    Second para should not have “being” in the sentence. My bad!

    Reply
  69. Alif said on November 12th, 2009 at 3:01 am

    @Reaction:
    That puzzled me as well. A conflict here, to be sure!

    Reply
  70. jan/sa said on November 12th, 2009 at 3:55 am

    alif i totally agree they should stay together and in that way nobody else will be pulled into the circus mess. i think pee boy is now so hooked on the pr and the way of life jolie has drawn him into that he would never be able to have a quite and normal relationship with anybody that wants to live a normal life. and to take on 6 or more kids as a new partner would be fatale for any decent woman with mis holie jolie in the back ground. they should really do a reality show and i am sure you would have 1000000 of people watching this trainwreck and wishing they would retire soon. i for one am sick of seeing them in the tabs and hearing about there lives and kids it feels like they even let you know when they are going to the loo. jmo

    Reply
  71. Alif said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:57 am

    @jan/sa:
    Yes, he’s on “sunny side of 50″, now. Nearing middle age! Things will slow down. But if he can drink moderately, certain potables can help him age well. From what I’ve read, that isn’t easy for him. Still might be on the “safe” side on the disease chart.
    Never heard of it? Ok, for Brangie, and any other celeb who is addicted, and all who are not, but curious, it goes like this:

    A—————————————————-B—————————————————–C

    Say, one drinks/does other drugs, or, whatever,
    and her/his history is between A and B, that person is safe.
    When that person passes B, he/she is safer the closer that person stays to B.
    Should the person continue, his/her disease will progress beyond B and will suffer the symptoms of the disease as it progresses.
    C is death.

    Off topic, but found this verrrry interesting!
    Read in the tabs, that Tommy is livid because of “insulting” comments from Brad Pitt and Christian Bale.
    CB allegedly stated that he used TC as an inspiration for “American Psycho”.
    BP allegedly called Tommy “strange” as in wacko!

    Reply
  72. Canuck said on November 12th, 2009 at 5:00 am

    @froufrou:
    Depp already did the “drugs, danger and darkness” thing in his youth, and then turned his back on it. I doubt that he’s looking to get back into that lifestyle, otherwise he’d already be doing it. Not only that, but he obviously wouldn’t put up with the famewhore tendancies of AJ, when is the last time you saw a pic of his kids? Like….never…

    Reply
  73. Q said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:12 am

    Angelina’s a total fake
    New revelations about cheating, plastic surgery and using her kids for publicity raise doubts about her saintly image
    Some big news broke for movie junkies on Nov. 4: Johnny Depp is in talks to join Angelina Jolie in the sexy spy thriller The Tourist. It will be the first time the duo have ever worked together. But the news was even more surprising because it completely contradicted a promise Angelina had made just weeks earlier. In an interview in the October issue of the British magazine Stylist, she said she intended to take a break from acting in part to focus on being a full-time mom to her six young children with Brad Pitt. “Maybe a film a year or every other year, and then I’ll phase things out.”

    Instead, she signed on for The Tourist, and she’s also in talks to play a femme fatale in the fashion-dynasty drama Gucci. Of course, Angelina’s entitled to change her mind — but this marks the third time she’s publicly proclaimed her intent to take time off to care for her children. Each time, she signs up for a new movie soon after, leaving Brad to do single-dad duty while she hits the movie set.

    Why the disconnect between what Angie says and what she does? Pick up the latest issue of Life & Style to find out!

    http://www.lifeandstylemag.com/

    Reply
  74. too curious said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    @Canuck:

    Good point! I was stunned that Ted C. said he thought AJ could get Depp if she wanted to. I think he is truly with his soul mate now and hope she doesn’t try to mess with him.

    Reply
  75. Pattyanne said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Could it be perhaps because Ian always has proof of what he states in print? Could be a warning to those trying to tarnish his written word.@Alif:

    Reply
  76. jan/sa said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    depp would never fall for this nutter, he’s been there done that and has passed that stage, but angie will never get past her past and loves the fame and attention too much. i think depps wife will be there and if jolie tried to impress she will get a fight like she never has before. i think jen was tired of peewee and has his ways and maybe she is glad jolie relieved her of the aging pensioner because some men get sloppier as they get older if they where dirty in their youth. depp has a strong will and is a decent and protective father and would never pimp his kids and wife out like peewee did in the w spread and his artistic photo shoots they protrayed jolie as a drunk, and pill popping neurotic wife of the 50ts maybe that is the type of woman peewee wants so he can control her like he is with jolie now. jmo

    Reply
  77. Pattyanne said on November 12th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    Read recently Alif, that Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz are making a movie together now called Wichita, a spy thriller. Funny isn’t it? Angie took spy roles from both of them, so now they are acting as such together in a new film. I think Angie has made a lot of enemies in HW@Alif:

    Reply
  78. Tidbit said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    @Q

    You do realize don’t you that The Tourist doesn’t start filming until 2011. She has, so far, nothing planned for 2010.

    Reply
  79. Tidbit said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @Reaction

    This is why I have a hard time believing halperin. Why would Angie have been on the set of Troy. It was finished in 2004. Mr. and Mrs. Smith in 2005. She would not have been on the set at all. A simple fact check with IMDb would confirm this.

    Reply
  80. Bitch Please said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    @Tidbit:

    Production begins in February 2010 and release for 2011. AngieHo stop the propaganda.

    Reply
  81. Bitch Please said on November 12th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    @Tidbit:

    They have been together since 2004. She was helping him with his image by publicly speaking about funding for a tax-free embryonic stem-cell research Saying, “We have to make sure that we open up these avenues so that our best and our brightest can go find these cures that they believe they will find.” He also supported California’s ballot imitative, Proposition 71, where federal government provide funding for research that use different types of stem cells, including adult and embryonic stem cells.

    Now let the propaganda begin.

    Reply
  82. Lisa said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    @Tidbit:
    Ian didn’t say Angie was on the set of Troy, he said he talked to someone who worked with Brad on Troy but didn’t know Angie.

    Reply
  83. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @Tidbit:

    How would imdb prove that Angelina never visited a movie set – does it keep a log of all visitors to the set of all films that were ever made throughout their production history? That would be one extensive database! Is this that “fact-checking” angle you were trying to work under another name before? If so just thought I better mention that I don’t think it’s going to be a winner – maybe try plan b or c or d etc?

    Reply
  84. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    @Lizzy:

    Yeah, I think the answer was probably already in your question!

    Reply
  85. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 12th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    @froufrou:

    Oh yeah, cos Angelina can just click her fingers and toss her mane and have anyone who crosses her field of vision right? All part of the bogus Angelina myth. Not everyone wants to get with the town pump. Including Rosie O’Donnell apparently!

    Reply
  86. Alif said on November 12th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I agree! It’s important to note that AJ has a shelf life re: her sexy image. The time will come when she wil be, if not now, viewed as “damaged goods”; i.e. her love interests, if they care, will think they’re just the latest in a long line of used goods! jmo!

    Reply
  87. jan/sa said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:39 am

    well i think her sell by date is just around the corner as that body is in noway sexy, i have a weight problem and hate to look at myself in the mirror and people have the cheek to say well you can eat anything and not get fat, but they don’t know how i really feel. so no ass and a skinny body is not sexy or healthy how she falls pregnant i really don’t know. and if she had twins those tats should be stretched and ugly as a thin person does not stretch well most the time. as for all men want her sorry but i have heard plenty of men say she is normal looking and they prefer a more womanly and rounded bob ad well as a more natural face not all lines and angles, peewee was deff thinking with the only brain he has and that one is in the lower region as the bigger one is empty, i am sure if he shakes his head you would hear the echos of a hollow region. jmo

    Reply
  88. jan/sa said on November 13th, 2009 at 6:42 am

    shit just had a thought ! yes i can think maybe she is inlove with jen and will devorce peewee and wants to hook up with jen with the 7 kids. she is just waiting her chance to film with jen to get her under her vava spell. watch out jen you are the next bat wing victimjmo

    Reply
  89. mooki said on November 13th, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    @Lisa:

    she was filming that Alexander the Great movie w/ Colin Farrell at the same time Pitt was filming Troy [all this in '03] (she slept w/ him too). They didn’t officially meet (rumors are swirling that they did meet in passing @ the ‘00 Oscars) until Mr and Mrs Smith in ‘04

    Reply
  90. mooki said on November 13th, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    @mooki:

    first Farrell, then Brad, then Depp? she’s co-starring w/ him next

    Reply
  91. Alif said on November 13th, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    @jan/sa:
    Well, jmo, but it seems to me that should she want to swing that way, JA has a wide field from which to choose. And AJ is, as I say, “used goods”.

    I’m one of those who always suspected that AJ was behind the wild rumors about JA and kids all along. And the reason was the timing.
    Then the NY Times article about how she controls her public image; well, that sealed it!

    BP, to me, is more like little Tommy. They both have a very bi—y side, imo. And I always remember BP is “missing a sensitivity chip”; to me, it’s much more than just one.
    And certainly little Tommy is the same as BP in many areas, with the exception that little T controls his beard better than B controls AJ.
    From what I’ve been reading, it’s almost like Brangelina’s roles are reversed. He’s the nagging fish wife, and she’s wearing the you-know-what!
    JMO!

    Reply
  92. Capri said on November 14th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Alif and jan/sa, I’m sorry to barge in on your conversation(I usually just lurk around) but I found it really interesting about Brange’s roles being reversed. I’ve been imagining how astounded Brad must have been when Ange finally decided to stop the deceptive personality she used to capture his interest. If it was a gradual thing or if bam! she took over saying this is how it is. I think he was always accustomed to being the one in charge. All these much younger girlfriends that he could dominate. I always imagined with Jen she was subtle about the everyday decisions and it appeared a partnership but his comfort came before her own. What a shock when the real Angelina decided to put in an appearance!

    Reply
  93. Alif said on November 14th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    @Capri:
    Yes, Capri, you are welcome to join in the conversation. It’s a free forum. No need to apologize.

    You know, sometimes Brangelina reminds me of Martha and George, in ‘Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?”

    Reply
  94. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    @Capri:
    I think that is very perceptive of you Capri,I would imagine about the same. Jen always said next go round she would not give as much of herself.

    Reply
  95. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    @mooki:
    They were sure friendly the first week on the set to have just met…

    Reply
  96. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    @Alif:
    Come now Alif, that time is up don’t you think, just look at her, how much more can one get , she looks like damaged goods to me. As one Hollywood player said, women think she is more beautiful than men do. She is not aging well at all.jmho…lol

    Reply
  97. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    @jan/sa:
    Same here Jan, I have always been thin too, but don’t feel bad hun, she did not have those twins, lol, we all know that, unless IAN shocks us with something new. Viv, maybe. Knox , I just don’t believe she gave birth to him.

    Reply
  98. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Hey well I can not wait to see who has been with the town pump, should be humiliating for Brad. You would think he would not want to ride this one out. They may have some idea of what is in the book, but they don’t know who has said what to IAN. With all her secrets and his, I just can not imagine him sticking with her through this and letting himself look even more like like a whining wuss. He does deserve this though. Gotta love that , just seems fair after all.

    Reply
  99. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    @Tidbit:
    Not exactly , that is not the set time for the start of filming. It is in pre-production now. The start date is January 2010, that is getting ready, training, etc. They will begin filming in February, and they are shooting for a 2011 release date.

    Wanted 2 is also in pre-production for a release date in 2011. If she does do this film she will begin it after she is finished with The Tourist.

    Brad has been working the last few weeks trying to nail down a director for Moneyball, when they make a decision between these two guys, it will be set, everything else is in place, seems to be.

    Lost City is to start sometime early 2010, so unless one of them gives up some films, they are going to overlap, and she definitely is not staying home with the kiddies, and unless both his projects fall through, neither is he.

    Reply
  100. Kate said on November 14th, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    @Q:

    Gucci, lol yeah with Leo, lets hope he does not do it. I don’t think I could watch it then. I love Leo, but with her, nooo. She also is rumored for Scarpetta, but again, these are all set for a 2011 release. She can’t do all of them, that would be 4 films…plus Kung Fu and the Kathy Lynn Austin Project for 2010 (also still in development), so baby mama is going to be busy if these all come through.

    Reply
  101. Alif said on November 15th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    @Kate:
    And ypu’re replying to which of my comments?
    I do agree with you that she isn’t aging well; thought I had made that clear.

    To everyone!

    Earlier this evening, I was at the supermarket. There on the front page of The ENQUIRER was Angie, with the headline, ANGELINA COLLAPSES, or something close to that.
    Then, at the checkout, here comes a thirtyish couple. Behind me, the guy I can only describe as Mr. Six Pack, began to loudly talk about Angie; how he saw a movie with her in it that he didn’t know was directed by Clint Eastwood, blah! blah! blah! Instead of looking to his wife, he seemed to need an audience; so he focused on me.
    I couldn’t speak with this guy. What he doesn’t percieve about Brangie could fill a book!
    I couldn’t get out of there fast enough!

    Reply
  102. Different Guest said on November 15th, 2009 at 1:35 am

    One can dream…. wouldn’t it be amusing if she went after Depp and he very publicly turned her down.

    Reply
  103. Alif said on November 15th, 2009 at 1:52 am

    @Alif:
    I don’t know if anybody notices but I do..that there seems to be an increasing amount of american celebs doing bad stuff. THEN, after they got what they wanted; i.e. massive media coverage, they then conveniently go on an apology tour of sorts. They know that most of the american public have a very short attention span. And previous offenders got off lightly after they apologized.
    Monkey see, monkey do!
    The old saying, that any publicity is good publicity.
    So maybe I should avoid all this annoying stuff and read less gossip, because I feel it’s processed; not natural.
    Back to reading poetry; trying to compose songs; hiking more; checking out spiritual stories, etc! etc!

    Reply
  104. jan/sa said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:30 am

    alif: here in south africa we have our famous people as well that do wrong and get caught out, when they admitt it people will maybe let it go the first time but after that they do not forget and you will find less and less interest and public appearances and then they just fade away. i think we are one of the countries that pay little attention to stars that visite here we are to busy with our own lives and problems to care about them. even our own stars think the brad pees and the seagals are idiots and think they are gods gift to earth. but we do like to pick them apart and laught at them. what is stupid is that these stars come here with bodygaurds and yet nobody even notices them or disturbs them so one bodygaurd would be enought and they must be at least under 30 years old because it is only the singers and bands that get any interest from our youth. i watched a move last night and they had this bad guy demand that money be transfered to a bank in south africa and had to laught because i told my nephew that they must think we are a really a backwards country but that they would arrive here and most likely the money would be missing never to be found again. and yes do check out the spiritual stories and enjoy the life you normally lead but please post ever now and again as you have a very interesting and good point of view on life and the brand that i enjoy., as well as being one of the friendly people here. jmo

    Reply
  105. jan/sa said on November 15th, 2009 at 6:36 am

    capri: it is really no shock that a woman and men sometimes put on a whole different personality when they meet somebody they want to trap. some get knocked up and others are quick to tell the other person how awfull the wife or husband is and then they praise the guy/girl and make them think the worst of the wife/hubby and protray themselves as totally opposite to that person and the guy thinks he has met the perfect other half. but once the trap is sprung they revert back to their normal self, deception is hard to keep up for ever. all new things become old just like the previous marraige and then we only have trust, friendship and loyalty left as marriage is just like a job and requires hard work to keep it going. jmo

    Reply
  106. Alif said on November 16th, 2009 at 1:10 am

    @jan/sa:
    Thanks for the shout out!
    South Africa is one nation that I only read about. Besides the political situation of some time back, there are the minor news items such as the blond surfer who was attacked by a shark. It was on the sports channel.

    So it was good to read about the country’s attitude towards celebs.

    Between now and Christmas, it’s going to be hectic at times. Thanksgiving coming up.
    I remember when I was attending a university in California, I was talking with a Swedish student. And thanksgiving was coming up. She expressed amazement that a whole country would be dining on turkey that one day.

    So it’ll be busy. Will still find time to check the board though. Maybe put in my two cents.

    Reply
  107. Mila said on November 16th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    I don’t think Johnny Depp would ever really be interested in Angelina Jolie… and oddly enough, I don’t think AJ would be interested in him. Honestly, she looks like she’d go for Depp’s wife, Vanessa Paradis. Other than BBT, Angie seems to like the pretty boys, no? BBT even said so. And while Johnny Depp is gorgeous, he’s completely different — also maybe too much what she wanted to be? He would eclipse her if they were a couple. And I bet she likes the attention more than a man (or a woman). And, yeah, this is completely made up. But I’m psychic, really…

    Reply
  108. RealityCheck said on November 16th, 2009 at 5:24 am

    Ian, how about the US WEEKLY deleting some posts about Jolie that may not be to her liking?

    I know what they’ll say – “It’s because we detected profanity” – but my posts have never contained profanity of any kind – just the plain truth in a much better form than the style of many of the posts there. Here is the comment they deleted today only seconds after I made it:

    “Angelina wasn’t sexually abused as a child – she was spoilt rotten by her stubborn, shallow, permissive mother who let her have whatever she wanted to have just to spite Jon Voight – including a live-in boyfriend at an age when no mother in her right mind would let that happen. Oh, wait! How about some early rehearsals of that “sisterly kiss” she gave to her brother in public ten years later? Now, that may qualify as a sexual abuse, though it looks rather consensual to me. Voight may look like a pain in the ass but he’d never let anything like happen if he was around. Is that why she hates him so much? Because he stood for limits in her mind, so he had to be cast as the Devil in the media?”

    I’m beginning to think that some people in the editorial room of US WEEKLY actually work for Jolie!

    Regards, RC

    Reply
  109. RealityCheck said on November 16th, 2009 at 5:40 am

    By the way, this doesn’t happen for the first time. I’ve had other posts about Jolie deleted on US WEEKLY before. I have noticed that the most vulgar and childish posts always remain but those that express a thought always disappear – it’s almost as if someone has told them: “Leave only the vulgar ones: they don’t harm Jolie; they just make all her enemies look like scumbags out to get ger and her a saint!” For some reason, it looks like someone doesn’t want the world to know that there are intelligent people making posts agaunst her because they despise the fact that someone like her is so lauded!

    It’s almost as if my alias have been put into their computer and all my posts get deleted as soon as they appear on their topics about Jolie.

    Reply
  110. RealityCheck said on November 16th, 2009 at 6:05 am

    I’m sorry for the typos in my second post – I was in a hurry.

    Reply
  111. joanne said on November 16th, 2009 at 8:07 am

    @Capri:
    I think Pitt didn’t care when she revealed her true self because he went ahead and added a bunch of kids to this mess. They want to be great, good for them, but those kids deserve better. I lost any fan status I had for Pitt when he went along with the adoptions.

    Reply
  112. guest2 said on November 17th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    @RealityCheck:
    haha that’s funny i posted on here and it

    Reply
  113. guest2 said on November 17th, 2009 at 9:42 am

    ooops meant to say it disappeared too !!!! Guess someone didn’t like what i had “implied” about getting paid by Us Weekly

    Reply
  114. Capri said on November 17th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    @joanne:
    Sometimes I wonder if he did go along with all the adoptions. I’ve read numerous times only AJ’s name is on the adoptions and she didn’t need his permission. Apparently she has only allowed the names to be changed.

    Reply
  115. Jewels said on November 18th, 2009 at 12:38 am

    Hi Ian,
    I am looking forward to your book for entertaining purposes only, I am interested in reading your “theories” on Brad & Angie because at the end of the day that’s what they are. Everyone has a past & as for the “deceiving the public wih their faitytale union”, really? I am not a celebrity & when I have a fight with my boyfriend I also put a happy face in public BECAUSE I don’t like people in my business, so I can imagine what Brad & Angie must feel like, when everything they do will be under scrutiny… Has anyone ever written a book about you? I am sure that would be pretty interesting in itself:)

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Meta