IUC Exclusive: It’s Raining Jolie Books

Posted on October 28th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

iandawnandrewJust wanna be clear. I have utmost respect and admiration for Andrew Morton, the famous British author who is penning an Angie bio for winter 2010. Morton is one of the best ever in the book biz. I urge all my readers and friends to give both books a read. In fact, my Morton sources tell me our angles are completely different. I always say the more the merrier. Two perspectives is always better than one. Here’s to a bestseller for both books. Originally, my project was a documentary but my publisher insisted on a book because of the explosive information I uncovered. At the time, I had no idea that Morton was writing a book on Jolie and when I found out, I tried to back out but my publisher held me to the contract. Below is a pic of Morton, glosslip editor/good friend Dawn Olsen and myself at my film premiere back in March 2008. Stay tuned!

  1. ladybert62 said on October 28th, 2009 at 9:39 am

    Hi Ian – like your tie in the picture! Thanks for the info re Morton’s book. Peace. :D

    Reply
  2. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 10:40 am

    Oh i’m staying tuned IAN, and waiting December 1st release date of Brangelina: Exposed. I’m sure it will be filled with very interesting truths at last. Good Job, and yes, Morton has a different writing style from yours. There is always room for another point of view.

    Reply
  3. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    @Pattyanne:
    I agree, and I think it was really gracious of Ian to give Morton his kudos.

    Reply
  4. guest1 said on October 28th, 2009 at 11:27 am

    You look like crap on this picture Ian! It`s a good thing you write about stars because you certainly could never BE one!
    By the way did your publisher tell you that wannabe authors such as yourself cannot be sued? If he did he was wrong!

    Reply
  5. mooki said on October 28th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Morton’s books on Cruise (even though he remained vague on the REAL father of Suri, although we all know CK is Suri’s daddy) and Madonna are among the best bios I’ve read

    Reply
  6. d said on October 28th, 2009 at 11:48 am

    @mooki:
    i think josh hartnett is suri’s father

    Reply
  7. guest1 said on October 28th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    @mooki:

    …you mean next to Intouch Weely, NE , Us Weekly ans Star and yes next to gossip about bestiality, affairs with a president, child murder, incest and drug sales. Wow your reading habits certainly show what a well educated, compassionate and cheerful person you are – NOT!

    Reply
  8. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    Ahhhhh Guest1/Mia, you bring a ray of sunshine where ever you go. Just seeing your posting tells me the fact that there will be THREE BOOKS within a year , all outing Brangelina for what they are is very disturbing to you. It’s a bitter pill to swollow i know, but truth is truth and we can not change it simply because we choose to not believe. It’s only just begun Mia, so don’t expend all your energy on IAN. There is also Morton’s tell all coming in the winter of 2010, as well as Mickey Brett’s tell all that is still in the works, yes Mia, it is still coming. @guest1:

    Reply
  9. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Very true Tam, IAN is a class act for sure. It would have been so much easier to do as many others have, take the cash and run, but a real investigative reporter/journo has integrity. Ian has shown us that. All the insane railings in the world didn’t sway him.@Tamara:

    Reply
  10. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    hahaha Saved me the trouble my friend! xoxo Hugs

    Reply
  11. Kate said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    Hey IAN! Nice picture, glad you cleared up the release dates as well. Looking forward to reading Exposed, I still chuckle over some of your comments in of your other books. Right PA two different styles! rockin on!

    Knowing that the three of you up there are chummy, I have to wonder if this was not part of the plan. Didn’t Dawn introduce you two years ago? Just teasing of course, but it does put some of those rumors to rest for Morton that Angie is really working on his book with him a threw him the nasty crumb about her mommy’s boyfriend to make it seem she is not part of it, to get her side of things in the story. He has said that is not true, months ago though. You know him though..getting back to part of the plan, spacing the release of the books out, keeping the hits coming does make it much harder for Angelina to rise above any of it and try to shrug it off. I wonder if she has found herself a public relations flack . Trevor , can he handle this? He has not done so well so far.(at least no these last two years) He keeps breaking all the rules, or she does. Way too many revelations for her to just stand with dignity and address them and ask for forgiveness, and hope the fans will forgive and forget, not with a laundry list. She has gone from someone who got all her secrets out there so they did not imprison her to someone who has created a Alcatraz for herself and Brad , and those adorable rag tag kids. What a shame. What a tangled web we weave..

    On the bright side however, she, and Brad can do what Rob Lowe did, hide out, and understand that in time and all the books have revealed all the secrets and lies (they were very foolish to think they would not come out) they can then go on with their lives, but like at least one of their mamas told them, “the truth will set you free!” Amen to that.

    This could be good thing. All of this is just my opinion of course..:)

    How is everyone today?

    Reply
  12. guest1 said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    @Tamara:

    Do I need to remind what “truth” in your eyes is? “truth” to you is everything that Ian /SR say and that supports your harted for Jolie. The more disgusting and sordid – the easier you believe it not needing a single proof nor a single story that turned out like it was predicted. That my dear is blind faith resulting in a witch hunt fuiled by unproven claims that only a very sick mind can make up and only an equally sick mind can absorb without questioning!

    Reply
  13. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    guest1/Mia, i know this was not directed at me, but i want to say to you that everyone has the right to form their own opinion based on the truth as they preceive it. Even you guest1/Mia. If you choose to blindly follow the loons in their parade of faith in the Glorious One, so be it. I love watching a parade! If we choose to believe based on research, biographies, personal quotes made by her father, ex b/f, mother, brother, ex husbands, then so be it. You seem to base your beliefs on National Enquier, Sun, Star, and Trevor’s P.R. releases/photo op set-ups. Good for you. It takes a strong personality to ignore the facts and base their belief on their “gut”. Onward and Upward guest1/Mia, i hope you can go through your entire lifetime without a major disappointment.@guest1:

    Reply
  14. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    guest1/Mia, i know this was not directed at me, but i want to say to you that everyone has the right to form their own opinion based on the truth as they preceive it. Even you guest1/Mia. If you choose to blindly follow the loons in their parade of faith in the Glorious One, so be it. I love watching a parade! If we choose to believe based on research, biographies, personal quotes made by her father, ex b/f, mother, brother, ex husbands, then so be it. You seem to base your beliefs on National Enquier, Sun, Star, and Trevor’s P.R. releases/photo op set-ups. Good for you. It takes a strong personality to ignore the facts and base their belief on their “gut”. Onward and Upward guest1/Mia, i hope you can go through your entire lifetime without a major disappointment.@guest1:

    Reply
  15. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    Dern Ian, i stuttered! That’s a first.

    Reply
  16. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Nah! I think it was just worth repeating

    Reply
  17. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Amazon is calling it Brangelina: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. Is that the real title now? Not exposed?

    Reply
  18. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @guest1:

    Mia – you are aware that this is not exactly Ian’s first book or the first time he has had to face the threat of legal action right? I think he knows a wee bit more about it than you my dear – well who doesn’t really. But thanks for bringing the issue of possible legal action up because we will then of course be able to see for sure whether Ian is right or not. If he is not Angelina will sue in a court of law and win won’t she? So we will all then know exactly where we stand and you can come and gloat to us about how “Ian makes up a pile of crap and you suckers lap up everything he writes etc etc”. It will resolve everything. Until then, I’m not really sure what the point of your relentless, tireless insulting of Ian and every other poster here really is? How many more ways can you think of to say “Ian is a liar, I hate you all, I am going to tell the teacher etc” hun? Not many I would have thought. We know your position, you know ours, and unless you can come up with something different to say, is there much point in continuing the – uh – debate? I really can’t see one. Do you genuinely have nothing better to do with life than this? Just saying!

    Reply
  19. guest1 said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Em the only problem with this is that I don`t read the Sun, the Star, or the NE. And I spit on the sort of “research” that Ian supposedly does! If he did then why did his Micheal Jackson book consist – at least to those amazon readers who reviewed it – to a large portion out of trial protocolls who were replayed almost WORD FOR WORD on tv at the time of the trial? Tell me what was Ian doing for 5 years when he based so much of his book on already released well-known material and filled the rest with unproven claims?
    I don`t care who Jolie slept with at 16 – I blame Marcheline ex-boyfriend who was a grwon man at the time probably at least twice her age, nor i I care if she has relationship troubles – that would be HER troubles that SHE needs to resolve, nor if Brangelina are going to split – no way are you not going to hear about that anyway. Nor do I make it my business and life goal to “expose” a stranger that I have never met and that hasn`t done anything to me.

    I happen to like some of her movies, think she has done a good job as an UNHCR representitive for the last 7 years or so – at least she isn`t spending her entire freetime in restaurants and spas. But each to his/her own.
    By the way there are more then enough positive quotes from people who actually worked with her. Just look them up.

    Reply
  20. Kate said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @guest1:
    I suspect that is going to change. To quote one of the most respected PR gurus in all of HW

    When a president leaves office people quickly scurry to write the first books on what went on behind the scenes, and when one becomes a A list star, there will be tell-all books written, and there are often very accurate..

    so his advice to his clients-

    don’t lie, don’t hide anything that you do not want to come back and bite you later, because it will…

    Thank You Mr. Bragman. I would love to see how he would chastise AJ. He was once asked how he would help Britney fix her PR mess. He said,”we can fix a PR mess, we can not fix someones lifestyle mess”…

    touche’

    Reply
  21. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    No, you just make it your business and life goal to “educate” us, total strangers that you have never met and that haven’t done anything to you on your daily visit to IUC. Sounds like a much better plan, Mia! Keep up the good work, after all you are making such a huge impact on our thought processes that it would be a shame to stop now!!

    Reply
  22. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    Sure guest1/Mia, i’ll rush out right now and search for some truthful , positive research on selfless acts Angie has done without a camera in her face. Yep, might take me a few decades, but i’m sure there is at least one there somewhere. Even Angie can slip up and do something honestly and selflessly right?
    So guest1/Mia, it seems you are a qualified literary critic? Nice of you to share your skills with us. Tell me guest1/Mia, did you read IAN’s MJ book or are you basing your opinion/review upon what someone else supposedly said ?
    You try too hard guest1/Mia, i’d think by now you would realize we don’t put Jolie on a pedestal here. So many celebs are UNHCR reps, but seems it’s only Angie’s face we see posted for each and every trip she makes. She does like to ensure the public knows about them. What a wonderful woman to adopt those children she so lovingly cares for without nannies (cough, cough). Why she even kept her word and took a year off work to ensure Pax was used to his American family and learned to communicate with them as he didnt’ understand or speak a word of English when she bought, oops!, excuse me, adopted him. She rarely films , as she is a selfless mother to six. Why i imagine you even believe she carried both the “twins” don’t you? Bless your heart guest1/Mia, keep your faith woman, but be prepared when the truth hits you in the butt.@guest1:

    Reply
  23. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @guest1:

    Oh it’s a loon, of course. So Chinnifer Maniston spends all her life drinking Margharitas, hanging out with her girlfriends and going to the salon right? Yeah, we know, we can all repeat those Jolie-influenced BS insults ad infinitum Mia. Funny that someone who claims to be so above all the allegations that are placed at Jolie’s door is more than happy to repeat the nonsense that is thrown at JA. How bloody unusual. And as for you “spitting on the research” Ian has done Mia, I can only assume you have written many a thesis or published work and can tell us exactly how a bio should be researched and exactly how you get a story published right? All the legal and editorial conditions that have to be fulfilled to get that story into the public realm right. Why don’t you tell us all about it Mia, seeing as you are so smart. It would be more productive than endlessly hurling insults at people who wouldn’t pee on you if you were on fire wouldn’t it?

    Reply
  24. jan/sa said on October 28th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    evening all i hope ian’s book is all that he promised and not a white wash of the brand and anti jen book. and i hope he got confirmation from jen what the true story behind the divorce was and not a source. as for the moms boyfriend i feel both jolie and him have to take the blame and shame as she was 16 years of age and no virgin so she knew exactly what she was doing. i think it is the most disgusting and lowest thing any daughter can do and how the pitt family can live with this is beyond me as that is nearly like sleeping with your mothers husband which is worse than breaking up a marriage. these two will never part and the only way to brave this storm is to stick together and i don’t believe jen will be willing to hang around for any amount of time if she wanted to take this moron back. so the stories of jen and peewee is total fabrication on the tabs part and i think she realized how lucky she is to be rid of this disgusting little balless man. jmo

    Reply
  25. guest1 said on October 28th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Of his Wanted costars Angelina Jolie and James McAvoy, Freeman has nothing but praise.”[James McAvoy] is a hard-working kid. Maybe too hard,” he says. “This is an action movie and he got a little ill.” When asked about Jolie, he says, “First I’m going to say something bad: She’s already taken.” Then he continues, “She’s an excellent person. Excellent actress. A joy to be with, a joy to work with. She comes by it honestly. Whatever it is, she’s got it.”
    http://www.reelzchannel.com/article/416/interview-with-morgan-freeman

    Washington (ANI): James McAvoy has praised his ‘Wanted’ co-star Angelina Jolie, insisting that the best thing about the actress is that “she doesn’t take herself too seriously.” The Scottish actor revealed that he had fun working with the ‘Tomb Raider’ actress as she was completely down to earth and was untouched by pretence.
    http://entertainment.oneindia.in/hollywood/top-stories/scoop/2008/james-mcavoy-wanted-angelina-200608.html

    Now Clint is openly singing the praises of his actor, comparing her to screen sirens of days past, and subtly criticising the face freezing that seems to be sweeping the industry:
    “(Angelina’s) wonderful. To me, she’s like a throwback to the women in film of the Forties. Not to say women today aren’t great, but back then there was more individuality.
    They didn’t have the same Botox look. Angelina has that great individuality, her own look and her own style.
    I think she would have been just as big a name in that era, the same as Katharine Hepburn, Bette Davis and Ingrid Bergman.”

    Multiple Oscar winning director and actor Clint Eastwood has nothing but praise for his latest leading actress, Angelina Jolie, 33. The 78 year-old screen legend said during a press conference that Angelina was so beautiful it must sometimes be a hindrance for her. He also praised her preparation and said she always came on set ready to go:

    Of Angelina Jolie – the leading lady in his latest directorial effort, the period drama Changeling – Eastwood, 78, says: “I’ve always admired her talent. She’s somewhat hampered sometimes by having this gorgeous face, the most gorgeous face on the planet. She’s on covers and all that stuff.

    “But,” Eastwood told veteran movie journalist Lillian Ross at a Saturday Q&A sponsored by the New Yorker magazine at the Directors Guild of America, “she is a great talent, and it would be easy to overlook that, except after seeing this you realize that she is this great, talented person.”

    “This” is Changeling, set in ’20s Los Angeles and the true story of a mother whose son is returned after a kidnapping – only the boy is not hers. Eastwood describes it as “a very tough story, it’s sort of an adult horror story. It’s what this woman had been put through by the Establishment.”

    When it comes to working with Jolie, “She’s very prepared. She comes in with a lot of preparation. She’s ready to go right away,” he says.

    [From People.com]
    http://www.whyfame.com/gossip/clint_eastwood_angelina_jolie_has_the_most_gorgeous_face_on_the_planet_6220

    Reply
  26. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    Remember too, that besides having sex with her mother’s b/f, she is reported to have an incestuous relationship with her brother as well. What are her boundaries? Son, father, uncle, what? And this is “Saint Angie”, Earth Mother. I pray none of her children grow up emulating her, but then, she will be the only example of “wife” and “mother” they will know. Ultimately we are all responsible for our own actions, and no amount of blame on another justifies choosing to live on the dark side. She is what she is.@jan/sa:

    Reply
  27. mia said on October 28th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    No she is not “reported” but rumored to have done that by some gossip editors who would give their life for a sensational headline! See the difference?

    Reply
  28. mia said on October 28th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    Of his Wanted costars Angelina Jolie and James McAvoy, Freeman has nothing but praise.”[James McAvoy] is a hard-working kid. Maybe too hard,” he says. “This is an action movie and he got a little ill.” When asked about Jolie, he says, “First I’m going to say something bad: She’s already taken.” Then he continues, “She’s an excellent person. Excellent actress. A joy to be with, a joy to work with. She comes by it honestly. Whatever it is, she’s got it.”

    Multiple Oscar winning director and actor Clint Eastwood has nothing but praise for his latest leading actress, Angelina Jolie, 33. The 78 year-old screen legend said during a press conference that Angelina was so beautiful it must sometimes be a hindrance for her. He also praised her preparation and said she always came on set ready to go:

    Of Angelina Jolie – the leading lady in his latest directorial effort, the period drama Changeling – Eastwood, 78, says: “I’ve always admired her talent. She’s somewhat hampered sometimes by having this gorgeous face, the most gorgeous face on the planet. She’s on covers and all that stuff.

    “But,” Eastwood told veteran movie journalist Lillian Ross at a Saturday Q&A sponsored by the New Yorker magazine at the Directors Guild of America, “she is a great talent, and it would be easy to overlook that, except after seeing this you realize that she is this great, talented person.”

    When it comes to working with Jolie, “She’s very prepared. She comes in with a lot of preparation. She’s ready to go right away,” he says.

    Washington (ANI): James McAvoy has praised his ‘Wanted’ co-star Angelina Jolie, insisting that the best thing about the actress is that “she doesn’t take herself too seriously.” The Scottish actor revealed that he had fun working with the ‘Tomb Raider’ actress as she was completely down to earth and was untouched by pretence.

    Reply
  29. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    Yes mia, we know you are an Angelina Jolie fan. @mia:

    Reply
  30. Astro said on October 28th, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    IAN: I can’t wait to see the Brangie’s Face when your book come out!

    Reply
  31. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 28th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    Jiminy crickets I just posted on FF to try and convince the escapees from the asylum that I have not nor ever have posted there just to calm this nonsense down and they don’t believe me!!!!! What is a girl to do?! I give up, these people hold on to their conspiracy theories like they are their last breaths!

    Ladies, I posted on FF, once and once alone to try to tell you all to stop taking the crazy pills but even that doesn’t work! Let the madness continue then – there is obviously no telling you all! Lol

    Reply
  32. Togi said on October 28th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @Astro:
    Soooo … what do you think? Will their faces be happy, sad, ticked off …?

    Reply
  33. DebFrmHell said on October 28th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Sorry. I looked here first to see if you said anything to the effect that you were going to/had done that post. There was nothing at that time so I figured there was some baiting going on. It has been happening all day by Guest Posters. I will correct it.

    Reply
  34. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Yep Keane, i saw that you were going to/had done that post, and not a one believed it was you. Lol, i’m still being accused of posting there though. It’s okay, they are having a rough time of it now, sort of like we had awhile back when we had to form a “safe room” to hide from the trolls. From what i hear, The Judge isn’t going to do anything to put a stop to what is happening any time soon either, so i guess it’s up to them to take care of it. I do feel sorry for all who have suffered the indignities of KC, that is one mean suckah! Thank You IAN for Banning Keane’s Cat and her anti-semitic, homophobic rhetoric from IUC. I mean that sincerely!!@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  35. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 28th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @DebFrmHell:

    Well thank the Lord for that!

    And TK – the point of my post was that you are all behaving like a bunch of crackpots in case you didn’t catch it! And your response to my post demonstrated that perfectly – you were all completely wrong about it like you are about a lot of things a lot of the time! And rather than holding your hands up and recognising that you have all been behaving in an utterly mental way these past few months, you continue to take digs at me instead. Yes the post was all about me showing off and saying I was amazing, not at all about trying to dispell your crackpot theories, whatever you say!

    For the benefit of anyone who missed the point of my post please can I just reiterate that PEOPLE AT IUC DO NOT CARE ABOUT PEOPLE AT FF, WE DO NOT TALK ABOUT YOU OR THINK ABOUT YOU, WE ARE JUST FRIENDS GOSSIPING ABOUT CELEBRITIES LIKE WE’VE ALWAYS BEEN. WE ARE VERY FLATTERED THAT YOU ALL THINK ABOUT US SO MUCH BUT IT IS NOT RECIPROCATED, I AM SORRY. This past week is the first time I’ve even visited the site and read the threads, and I did so purely because it was so freaking funny! Seriously ladies, I wish you all the best honestly, there are no hard feelings. I just wanted to point out to you that Santa Claus is not real, there is no big conspiracy theory. Or at least, if there is, it doesn’t involve me or anyone I would call a friend. Sorry to disappoint you but this is microscopic in terms of importance to everthing else in my life. I just don’t want you to waste any more of your lives on utter nonsense.

    Reply
  36. Kate said on October 28th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @Astro:
    Astro, they have known about the book, all of them for a very long time. TMZ changed the way publicist did biz for stars. No longer could they white wash things for them, and thanks to Pellicano no longer can they play dirty. So now it is a matter of “how do you want to do this?” see..that is what Harvey did..he gave them a choice, we can just go with it, or I can be fair and you can give me your side, and we will try to balance the story. But people like Brange do not think this applies to them because they try to control the stories, they seem to think that things still work the way it did 20 years ago. It doesn’t, and Miss Ang is going to quickly find that out. As fast as the media will build you up, they will also tear you down. She started pissing them off with that incident with the press and the PC that she blocked certain news agencies, and then blamed it on her lawyers. She went on some shows for damage control. Didn’t work,they did not forget that, and it has been downhill ever since then.

    Brad did something similar. He hates paps so much he has them arrested, when they are not in the wrong. That does not bode well for his production company, not when they win, and not when they turn around and sue him, and win. This has been going on for some time now. The public does not see all this, but Brad knows this woman is pulling him down to the ground. She knows somewhere in that arrogant head of hers that she is messing up. She brillantly pulled herself up, only to believe her own hype, enough so to totally leave her entire family in shambles. Brad made the same mistake. Concealed things lied, bought into what she was selling, and while he has gotten a free pass much of the time, he will not on much of this. Why? because of WHO he is with. She may be the sexiet and the hottest, but she is not America’s Sweetheart, and the public is not going to let him forget it. He could have the same secrets unveiled about his past, and if he was still with Jen, he could humbly ask for forgiveness, and all would be well. Not in this case. He has arrogant spit in the face of God. He never did that when he was with Jen. He has the right to not believe, but it is “how” one presents themself..something he has forgotten it so seems. He looks a mess. If he is dressing down, he needs to stop. His attitude is no longer what it was five years ago, but he brought much of this on himself. He looked into the camera, and he lied..stupid, stupid, stupid. What was he thinking? He wasn’t. He got rid of Cindy. Again stupid. Things have unraveled since he did that. He thinks he
    knows how to handle the press, but you can not out think the media, can not be faster than the internet.
    He thinks because he is Brad Pitt it does not apply to him, Brangelina, before he understood that he could be taken down as fast as he was brought up, he understood that the person you were with helped take you up, that his success was multiplied by theirs, and he understood that very well. He did not apparently understand , how quickly their foolish mistakes could bring him crashing down,and that is how it works. What one can get away with, another can not. I could give you a hundred examples, but just compare the faux pas across political lines and there you have it.

    Sometimes you can not buy people off, and sometimes you just have to hold your head up high and admit that you screwed up, and then go on with your life.

    jmo of course. Let’s sit back and watch the circus act, as the ringmaster tries to get them back in the act.

    Reply
  37. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    Well said Keane. I know they find it difficult to believe that we have moved on, but they have been so busy fighting since they went there, they don’t realize we have had nothing but PEACE here. Oh sure, we get the occassional troll (hi mia) but basically we have peace. What it boiled down to was their theories of why we created GD. All they had to do was ask LadyB, she was one of the people all for it, or so she told us. We needed a place safe from troll attack (like what FF is enduring now) where we could chat about our lives, loves, likes, whatever in peace and privacy. No big conspiracy theory, no huge FF discussions. FF is not a closed, private blog, anyone can go there, anyone can post there if they choose. So you are going to encounter people from ALL OVER THE WORLD posting on FF, it’s not a small neighborhood. Different cultures have differing points of view, and some carry bigotry with them as a flag held high. When you post on FF you have to be aware you will most likely draw fire from people who oppose your views. It’s part of such a huge blog with so few administrators/moderators. So please, accept responsibility for your own actions, and quit trying to lay blame on Tamara, Keane, Kate , or me, or any of us here. Seriously, we have moved on long ago!! Wish you all peace over there, and i hope you find a way to stop the warring.

    Reply
  38. DebFrmHell said on October 28th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    The reality of any of those guest posters being you were soundedly discounted. You would be the first to say something directly and NOT hide under the Guest tag. Formers all agreed on that! And you proved it today.

    Reply
  39. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    Now back to what’s important: IAN, did you discuss any of the book’s contents with Morton? Share theories perhaps? Just curious.

    Reply
  40. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 28th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @DebFrmHell:

    Deb, they’re still doubting it – I just read it with my very own eyes! SURE this is the first and last time she ever posted or words to that effect. It’s always the same, people can’t seem to see what is in front of their very own eyes. We are just a hundred or so random people commenting on a couple of irrelevant gossip blogs! (Sorry Ian, but IUC is not that relevant yet, maybe one day it will be!). But in the mean time, this is not Watergate, this is not the assassination of JFK, this is not the MP expenses scandal (for the benefit of the Brits out there), it’s a flipping blog! Please people put it into perspective!

    Reply
  41. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    http://www.popsugar.com/5893638

    Slideshow of six photos of Angelina Jolie modeling in the 1990’s. Includes the old nose, the old lips, and the old eyebrows. Way to go Angie.

    Reply
  42. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    H1N1 is making the round in HW…Teri Hatcher is down with it now.

    Reply
  43. DebFrmHell said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Dayumitall, you just blew my Grassy Troll Theory all to hell. 8-)

    Reply
  44. BeenThereDoneThat said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    Here is my opinion. I read here every once in a while, but very rarely comment. I don’t believe Sugar Ray is real. Or Ms. 9-Cent. They went when Ian checked out, and are now back when he needs the attention for his book. Also, there was a post by Ian some weeks ago written in the Sugar Ray style. That nailed it for me. And the shocking rumors about Brangie that can never be proved kept getting piled on and piled on until it was apparent that no human could be guilty of all those vices and still be walking upright. I am a little dumbfounded that people still try to make sense of the rantings of alter egos Sugar Ray and 9 Cent. And, there’s the pesky little fact that he got a LOT wrong in the Michael Jackson book. Based on all the false gossip here, and the individual histories of Andrew Morton and Ian Halperin, credibility goes to Morton for writing a biography that will be at all near the truth.

    You might wonder why I continue to read here. Well, that would be due to my interest in the personalities and dramas of the posters. You guys have kind of grown on me.

    Reply
  45. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Keane and @Deb – I was going to go there and say that – if Keane were to post here she would use her own avie and wouldn’t hide behind guest and say what she had to say. Except they were in the middle of such a flame war that’s been going on for days now it seems I didn’t want to even stick my toe in. But when I do comment on FF I always go in as some form of my own name, Tam usually, and that’s that. I have not been trolling around all the various threads as “guest” causing mayhem. But I sure get accused of it often enough!! LOL

    Reply
  46. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Well, am I absolved too??? Why does my name keep coming up there – I can’t figure that one out!!

    Reply
  47. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    Lol, well thanks, i think. Diversity is what life is about. Thanks for sharing your opinion.@BeenThereDoneThat:

    Reply
  48. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    Hey BTDT, isn’t it amazing how much the press is putting out there now about Brangelina? I think that is due to the book coming out, and they want to deflect some of the heat, and figure out how to handle the bad press and questioning.

    I agree that IAN’s been played once or twice by sources that were less than honest, perhaps deliberately sent to deflect the issue and put him on the wrong trail, but remember who we are dealing with her, she ain’t no Mother Theresa in my book!

    Reply
  49. DebFrmHell said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    @Tamara:
    LOL! Of course. Trying to ignore Disgruntled Guests is even trying my patience. Usually I look for humor in these situations but I am willing to make exceptions now…

    I will say that this is going to get way worse before it gets better. For BOTH sites because, regardless of size, they are still known to be “Anti” boards. When IH gets that book out the loons from JJ/JJB are going to come here in droves. Methinks a good majority of the DGs over there are JJers AND the opening salvo for both the sites. That is IMO!!! I think I tried to tell Keane the very same thing a few weeks ago. About a whole new can of worms….

    Reply
  50. Tamara said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Tell SZ to get that blog started immediately and then you’ll have a safe place! LOL Phew, sounds like you need one now! ha!

    Reply
  51. Kate said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    I have honestly gotten to the point the trolls can blitter and blatter all day long about me and whoever and waste their breath, I don’t care. Not one bit. I am more focused on this PR nightmare that is about to derail the Brand, and take Jen with them.

    Reply
  52. DebFrmHell said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    @Kate:
    It better not take Jennifer down! I have been a Jenniloonie every since that freaking divorce! That woman has had the face of peace and inner contentment for the last couple years and it has been hard fought for, IMO! It would really piss me off. and I am willing to bet I am not alone in that boat.

    Reply
  53. Vittoria said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    Dish it dude!!!!!!! I think they will both be awesome books!

    @Kate:
    You right Kate to just let it roll off. Once cannot reason with unreasonable people. Never.

    Reply
  54. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    Awww, Patrick Swayzie’s widow is on Access Hollywood right now, she says she sat with the remote in her hand for 15 minutes before she could put the channel on his movie Ghost. It’s good that Patrick left so many wonderful movies behind, it has to be comforting to be able to see, hear and watch him move naturally again.

    Reply
  55. Pattyanne said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    True Vittoria, we can only control how we feel, not how others do. Letting it go is the first step to self healing :-)

    Reply
  56. Vittoria said on October 28th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    @guest1:
    @guest1:
    Well darling it’s not too late to learn to read. As long as you keep waking up on the right side of the grass, you can learn!

    Reply
  57. Kate said on October 28th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    I don’t mean it will take her along with intention, but she will of course be drawn into it because the book covers why her marriage ended. How long he cheated..

    Reply
  58. Kate said on October 28th, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    @Vittoria:
    You know I don’t really care what kind of sexual revelations there are in any books, if she slept with her moms bf or James, those things will be bad enough for her, but she will overcome those if there are explanations from her childhood, such as child abuse, or molestation , something, she will become the victim. People will feel sorry for her, the way she is. They will think she has overcome all that and done amazing things with her life in spite of all that. They will feel those are the things that drove her to the darkness , to being a cutter, to the heroin, to all the sex, the cheating, all of it.

    But-if the big shocking exclusive in IAN’s book has nothing to do with sex, if it is something that contradicts who she has become, the Humanitarian, that cares so much, if she has done something so illegal that she can not advance in Washington, that she would not be welcomed back in Cambodia, if she has broken the law, that is something that she will not overcome.

    It is one thing to end up a screwed up mess from a terrible up bringing from HW parents and to try to overcome it and do the best you can, and succeed, and still fall a little along the way. Sex and drugs have been a part of the silver screen since it began. No one will even blink. They will not care if she is still shagging JS. They will not care if she cheated on Brad or that they have a open relationship, or that they have a unstable relationship, who doesn’t in that business.

    What they will care about are illegal adoptions, if she faked her pregnancy, if the reason she did so was not acceptable , if she has imported or exported something she should not have, if she has illegal off shore accounts she can not explain, etc. Those are the kinds of things that will take them down. Both of them.

    JMO so when I think of a shocking revelation that is what I am expecting..

    Reply
  59. Astro said on October 28th, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    @Togi:

    Come on!!!…It will be the same reaction so far. They will say: What a funny book!…Maybe Hollywood will make a funny movie based on the Ian’s book!.HAHAHAHA

    Reply
  60. Astro said on October 28th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    Maybe Brangie is thinking about to go to the IAN’s book party, like this:

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/10/28/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-half-the-sky/

    Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie: Half the Sky Sweethearts

    Reply
  61. Astro said on October 28th, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    Jennifer Aniston’s baby bombshell

    http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebrity-news/428006/jennifer-aniston-s-baby-bombshell/1/

    Reply
  62. Vittoria said on October 28th, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    @Kate:
    Phone home sisters!!! I have some awesome news!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  63. Vittoria said on October 28th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    @Kate:
    Here’s to hoping@ That is pretty rich!

    Reply
  64. Togi said on October 28th, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    @Astro:
    Hey Astro! I have to admire your stick-to-it-edness and your awesome sense of humor! And who knows … you may be right! LOL :-)

    Reply
  65. Astro said on October 29th, 2009 at 5:35 am

    OK…Ian: Your answer from the media about your “Irreparable Tension”.

    http://x17online.com/celebrities/angelina_jolie/brad_angelina_show_theres_no_irreparable_tension_in_this_relationship-10282009.php

    Here the way that Brangie usually uses to go againts the gossips….FACTs instead BLABLABLABLA.
    “Hand in Hand”…Hand in Shoulder.

    Reply
  66. Brigadier General Johnson Jameson said on October 29th, 2009 at 5:41 am

    @Pattyanne:

    H1N1 is a conspiracy by those damn anal probing little green guys from the Face on Mars.

    I don’t have to worry about it because I live in my bunker complex 600 Miles underneath Saskatchewan while being interviewed by Art Bell.

    Reply
  67. mooki said on October 29th, 2009 at 6:31 am

    new Star Magazine cover…. thoughts anyone?

    Reply
  68. mooki said on October 29th, 2009 at 8:15 am

    @mooki:

    “Tom and Katie: The End”
    http://coverawards.com/2009/10/28/star-tom-katie-the-end/

    Reply
  69. Tamara said on October 29th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    Morning Everyone!!! It may be raining Jolie Books on IUC but it is raining Cats and Dogs in my town today!! Sheesh, I’ve never seen so much rain…it has literally been raining for like weeks now!

    Reply
  70. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    A part of me is saddened to read that mooki. I guess i like to believe in Happy Endings. Seems so many HW hook-ups end with family break ups, sad for the child(ren) involved. Suri sees so happy and well satisfied with her life. I’ve read all the commentary that Tom is gay, but i just can’t believe that somehow. Guess i just don’t want to. thanks for the url@mooki:

    Reply
  71. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 10:51 am

    If you tire of all the rain, come to Florida where we are having perpetual summer it seems. Here it is nearly November 1st, and it’s going up to 90 degrees again today. Very unusual weather for us; the hot temps began by or before May 1st, and still continuing….arghhhhh! I’m sick of sunshine and heat!@Tamara:

    Reply
  72. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 11:08 am

    I see Jon Gosselin’s g/f Hailey Grossman is playing the sympathy card, “Oh woe is me, he is emotionally abusive to me”….yea, so much so he paid $70,000 for the SUV he bought you, and the $400 bag, and the trip to France….very abusive. The show is gone, and so is Jon’s mega billfold….ergo….she’s off!

    Reply
  73. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    Ted C. : Morton’s Bio On Angie

    Bitch-Back! Will Angie’s Secrets Be Revealed?
    http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b151230_bitch-back_will_angies_secrets_be.html

    “Dear Bad Bio:
    If Morton’s Tom Cruise tome is any indication, don’t bother with his Angie book. You can find out more goss on the tattooed vixen just by sticking to the Awful Truth. And Brangelina’s still playing the same game, keeping those über-smiles stuck on their faces when everyone’s watching. More annoying than that gross scruff Brad’s growing on his mug, blech. But for the record, hope I’m wrong here and Morton gives us a real Princess Di-style page-turner—just doubt it.”
    “““““““““““““““““““““““““““`
    I’m very much looking forward to receiving my copy of Ian’s book, Brangelina:Exposed , on December 1st. Based on what we’ve learned here, and was hinted at, i am wholly expecting a real expose’. Most likely i will also purchase Morton’s book late in 2010 when it comes out , to add to my library. It will be interesting to read both .

    Reply
  74. lizzieb said on October 29th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    If La Jolie did have sex with her mother’s boyfriend that would explain something that has been bugging me. In my experience, the women who sleep with other people husbands identify with men rather than other women and are often acting out their jealously at Mum being a rival for Dad’s attention. . See, I can take him from you etc. But whilst Ange does fit the profile in that she appears to have no female friends, and use her sexuality to get whatever she wants, her professed love for her mother and her dislike of her father seemed to contradict that norm. But, if she did go behind her mother’s back with her partner the picture becomes clear. She doesn’t like other women and her old bollocks about not being able to face herself if slept with a married man is just that- utter bollocks. She took great delight in taking BBT from Lorna Dern- who can forget Miss Dern’s quote that she went away and when she came back her fiancé was married to someone else- and in taking Billy Goat Brad from prom queen Jennifer.
    You know, I really hope these books because a backlash against the homewrecker and her himbo.I don’t want my daughter growing up in a world where a woman with no respect for other woman is so lauded.

    Reply
  75. Tamara said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    LOL I already spent 33 years in Florida and that’s why we left, we loooove the seasons.

    Reply
  76. lizzieb said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    In England I can only dream of this ’sun’ you refer to. It’s only 20 past five in the evening and it’s been dark for about half an hour. If I saw a yellow thing in the sky I would faint.
    To get back to the matter in hand. Let’s play what will the loons do when they split. Kool aid and valium? Rapid transfer of affections to either St Ange or Bradders blaming the other one for what ever festering shite emerges? Denial?

    Reply
  77. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    Just received an updated delivery date from Amazon.com for my book, Brangelina: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. It appears the title was changed from Brangelina: Exposed. New delivery date (in my hot little hands) December 3rd. Looking forward to receiving it~!!

    Reply
  78. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    Well lizzie, in my opinion of the loon mentality, i think they will split apart and there will then be two loon encampments. Pro Braders, and Pro Angie. Hopefully they will declare war on one another’s encampments and leave the rest of us alone to snark, “Told Ya So”….lol@lizzieb:

    Reply
  79. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    Then you understand my point of view regarding endless shushine and warmth. Sorry lizzie, but even good things become tiresome after awhile of day in, day out, yadda, yadda. LOL. I’d gladly trade with either of you for a month in the winter up where it’s cold, and one can wear a coat, and curly up in front of a blazing fireplace. Just a month mind you. LOL@Tamara:

    Reply
  80. kharmickhaos said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    @Kate:
    Dear Kate,

    I have no idea why you are so angry about something people you likely don’t have a personal relationship with, but it seems you are truely hurt by what has happened. Might I suggest you speak to a friend, a pastor, Iman or Rabbi about you fixation and get to the source of your pain. I came on the site seaking information regarding Ian’s upcoming book as I plan to buy one for my wife as a Christmas gift. She enjoys celebrety gossip, and yes I have seen her angered at some of the stars for what they have done. But you Kate, treasured soul, please you protest so much!

    Angelina is beautiful. And Brad is well a guy. ( I don’t have the gene that allows me to judge him other than not ugly). I distrust any public demonstration of stars obtaining children from poor countries around the world. With their financial resources they could have sponsored several villages to take in the abonded children, left them with their culture and still occassionaly visit these kids.
    There is IMO something suspect in their motivation. Though it can be said they have brought the whole problem home with them.
    Finallly to the troll who has posted guest 1 who appears to have her hate on with Ian, perhaps you too have strode too far into the side of prejudgment or represent a cult that actually hates people who offer a different point of view than yours. Seek help.
    Anyone who enters the public realm must accept scrutiny. Ian appears from his MJ book, to be a thourough investigative journalist and he can substantiate his work with evidence. I was suprised when reluctively reading his MJ book to note his compassion for his subject. Not typical for an author who writes unauthorized accounts about the famous.
    So I expect that my wife will enjoy telling me what she has read and that will encourage me to read it. Peace be to all here and to some, seek a friend.

    Reply
  81. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Amen to that lizzie. For a woman of such low moral values to be praised and adored by some groups gives me pause. I hate to sound like my mother, but, “What is the world coming to?”. Also, i read she and her mother were estranged for a good number of years do to Angie’s seducing her b/f. Also, seems strange to me that Angie as well as Brad would excuse her extreme weight loss to grief over losing her mother, when it’s been well reported her mother died alone. Angie did not come to her death bed. @lizzieb:

    Reply
  82. d said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    s@Pattyanne:
    see its been marked down in price too @

    Reply
  83. lizzieb said on October 29th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Why my dear the sun has turned your head. Ange loved her mother, she would never sleep with a married man and her commitment to charitable causes means that ‘what the world is coming to’ is a better place. Having a little trouble posting this- a pig just flew in the window and ate my mouse.It’s OK tho’- the fairies at the bottom of my garden will fix it.

    Reply
  84. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    I guess they plan to make up for that by the sheer volumn of sales. All the better for me, now my Amazon.com account will have a + balance…lol@d:

    Reply
  85. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Roflmboooooooo. You do facetious sooooo well.@lizzieb:

    Reply
  86. Togi said on October 29th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    @lizzieb:
    Soooooooooooo nice to read the posts of someone with a sense of HUMOR! LOL. You are cracking me up, lizzieb.

    Regarding the Florida sunshine and warm temps … I think I’d take some of that right now! Here in Alaska, we’ve been having plenty of sunshine but the daylight hours are getting short and the temperatures are FINALLY beginning to drop a bit. We had such an awesome Fall … it’s still going on, actually. Still no snow on the ground, but I’m not sorry about THAT! It will be here soon enough … and then it will seem to never go away. Sigh. Yep. I’d take a nice bit of Florida beach right about NOW. :-)

    Reply
  87. benjaminbutton14 said on October 29th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    @Astro:
    bb14. Looking at those photos they don’t look that happy to me, seen happier faces on skeltons looks like he is happy to get away from her.

    Reply
  88. Togi said on October 29th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    OM goodness, bb14. Did you see the PUPILS on that woman? She looks like plastic, I tell you! And she couldn’t walk without holding onto the car or SOMETHING. It’s my very untrained opinion that she was higher than a kite. LOL

    Reply
  89. Kate said on October 29th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Hi Deb, I have questiion, have you ever read any of IAN’s books? I ask that question because of some of the comments you made on the other site, so I was wondering which books you were referring to? I am just curious…

    Reply
  90. mia said on October 29th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    Published Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:15 AM ET
    Andrew Morton says his book doesn’t accuse Angie of sleeping with Mom’s lover
    It is being widely reported that controversial celebrity biographer Andrew Morton is writing a book about Angelina Jolie that claims the actress slept with her mom Marcheline Bertrand’s live-in lover when she was just 16, destroying the relationship in the process.

    There’s just one problem with the story: It’s just not true, Morton tells Life & Style.

    Morton is writing a bio of Angie, and while he’s not revealing specifics, if it’s like his previous books about Tom Cruise, Princess Diana and other celebs, it’s sure to include some shocking details.

    Morton tells Life & Style that his latest project will definitely not accuse Angelina of her of sleeping with her mom’s lover.

    The report is false, says Morton. “It’s about as true as I’m sitting on this horse.”

    For more of the latest celebrity news, pick up this week’s issue of Life & Style, on newsstands now!

    Photo Credit: Retna

    Reply
  91. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 29th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    Great thread on FF by the Guest posters about how a lot of stories about Angie being taken advantage of as a child seem to be being released right now. And then another dreadfully clunky PR shot of her holding a book about women overcoming oppression to succeed in life. “Angelina the Victim at the Hands of Oppressive Men” is it now Trev? Pretty desperate isn’t it? Still, what do you both have to lose really. Shame on Brad for participating in this farce. It is sick. She will really stoop to anything to try to hold on to her dubious career won’t she? She really does disgust me. I guess the strategy now is to embrace her notoriety and play on it to the max. Katie Price eat your heart out.

    Reply
  92. lizzieb said on October 29th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    Keane, there is nothing the desparate tart would not do to keep her ‘outsider’ or ‘victim’ status so stand by, here it comes1

    Reply
  93. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 29th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @lizzieb:

    Hm I know, the FF Guests are totally on to it. I would bet my house that at least one of those books are being written with Angelina’s full involvement. Either the Morton or the Brett book, or my guess: both. I don’t think she would talk to Ian; she has just leaked fake stories to him to try to make herself look sympathetic and Jen look worse. God it must be stressful being Jolie and having to spend every day desperately fighting to save your non-career hey? No wonder she looked smug when she signed on to do that Charlize-reject film. I bet she thought, still I can still book movies, na na na na na!

    Reply
  94. Pattyanne said on October 29th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    Angie’s real problem right now is all the talking she’s done over time. It’s rather difficult to cry LIES, when you are caught on tape or video speaking the very things you deny. Angie was too flagrant with the stories she put out to impress the Goth factor, build up her BadAzz image, and now there is no way to white wash it and dilute it. As Angie said, It is what it is. Yea Angie, you certainly are.

    Reply
  95. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 29th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Hey CG, just a note to say for someone who went to FF to get away from me you don’t seem to really be able to stay away from the place do you?! Your trolling attempts were lame, your cracking of the internet non-conspiracy was lame and if I were you I would be as embarrassed as you sound. I never said whether I knew whether you were KC or not but it seems very lilely to me. You threatened to beat DG up for her supposedly “racist” views on adoption, presumably in defence of your real life friend TK who is a lot weaker than you. Standing up for a friend is fair enough but your loyalty was misplaced; DG was not being racist, she was just talking about the basic facts of the relative success rates of adoption which are very well known. Maybe she said things that were uncalled for but TK also massively over-reacted. Both you and TK seemed to be aggireved that for once I didn’t get involved in the row and weigh in to defend you. Guess what, as I am told a hundred times a day, it is not my board and I do not need to get involved with everything, so you will just have to deal with that.

    But anyhow, I don’t recall anyone ever saying they knew what your IP address was CG as no-one has ever given an eff about you. You have really had a very exaggerated sense of your own imprtance to the “Dull Gang” as some like to call it. Or maybe someone said they knew the IP of KC and you got confused? Anyway, who cares at the end of the day, it’s a storm in a flipping egg cup. And as for all the “how very dare you” crap becase I said you might possibly be the person behind a vile internet troll, well did it occur to you that trying to acess our personal details through “your contacts at blogspot” (in sales it’s all about contacts and all that – LMAO!) may have been marginally out of line? Nevermind, anyway, I know you have some issues in life CG so why don’t we just let it slide. This is not a matter worth getting yourself into a lather about. See ya.

    Reply
  96. DebFrmHell said on October 29th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @Kate:
    The James Taylor Fire and Ice and the & The Kurt Cobain books are all I have read of Ian Ha;perins tomes.

    Reply
  97. Kate said on October 29th, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    And you did not find any sources named in those books, I was curious about that? I was surprised how many people IAN did name in his books, first and last names, and famous people that could easily denounce him if he did not really talk to them because he has met with quite a few, so I was really perplexed by the comment that he never names any sources. That was why I asked. It just struck me a little odd. Were you talking about the books, or the stories here on the website?

    Reply
  98. Kate said on October 29th, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    And you did not find any sources named in those books, I was curious about that? I was surprised how many people IAN did name in his books, first and last names, and famous people that could easily denounce him if he did not really talk to them because he has met with quite a few, so I was really perplexed by the comment that he never names any sources. That was why I asked. It just struck me a little odd. Were you talking about the books, or the stories here on the website?

    Reply
  99. Vittoria said on October 29th, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    Ian – somebody said that you met Ava Gardner!!!! OMG, i love her!!!!! That had to be the absolute coolest thing. I mean, I know she was probably pretty drunk, but no matter, she was still the coolest chick ever! Anybody ever see Night of the Iguana? She rocked that movie and every other one!)

    Reply
  100. Kate said on October 29th, 2009 at 9:08 pm

    @Vittoria:
    Vic you should read “Hollywood Undercover’ I laughed all the way through that book, mainly at how IAN talks to himself, and the way he laughs at himself. One of his lighter reads , definitely entertaining.

    Reply
  101. Vittoria said on October 29th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate – Good evening! I surely am going to. I wanted to anyway, but when I heard Ava’s name, I was extra hyped. I just love, love, love her……issues and all!

    Reply
  102. Vittoria said on October 29th, 2009 at 10:37 pm

    @Kate:
    The thing about Ava Gardner is that she was out there with it. There was no sugar coating to disguise debauchery. Angie used to be that way. I think many of us liked her when she was a wild child and didn’t apologize for it. Trying to convince the world that you’re Mother Teresa just isn’t cool. Hell, even Mother Teresa wasn’t Mother Teresa! There was a bit of a smokescreen there. With Ava, nope. She just was what she was. That’s nice.

    Reply
  103. mia said on October 30th, 2009 at 12:54 am

    @Vittoria:

    Strange but I have never heared Jolie call herself “Mother Theresia”. She was always VERY open about her “wild child” youth and most of the things you accuse her of came out of her own mouth.

    Reply
  104. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 7:53 am

    @Vittoria:
    Morning Vee! I don’t know much about Ava with the exception of Frank Sinatra’s obsession with her. So evertyhing I’ve ever read has been from his biographers POV

    Reply
  105. Айвазовский said on October 30th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    Хм… Мне пригодится…

    Reply
  106. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 30th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    Another great thought on FF, that the “Angie seduced her mother’s boyfriend when 16 years old” story is not in Morton’s book at all but is being leaked by Jolie’s camp to try to deflect from what the possible real stories might be. They did the exact same thing with the Mickey Brett book didn’t they – those ridiculous nappy sex stories – yeah it all makes sense. I can’t believe the lengths they will go to to try to stop the truth coming out. Do they seriously think they can control this, that they will be able to get out of it all with this crazy la jolie PR? These people are STUPID, I’ve always said it. How on earth did they think they would be able to get away with it? By showing up in every war-torn country and saying cheese for the cameras? They must be on drugs if they thought they could get away with murder by covering it up with a few photo opps. How stupid can people be. Silly, silly Angelina. And stupid old Trevor. What a shocking pair!

    Reply
  107. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Well, to generalize, I think most HW people are stuipd anyway. Thats why they get led around by their managers, publicists etc. They are schooled on what to say, what to wear, which charities to promote, who to date etc. I would hazard a guess that AJ might have maybe an 8th grade education at best.

    Reply
  108. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Tamara:
    …which is why the reporters have to submit their questions ahead of time so her publicist can tell her how to answer, its all smoke and mirrors IMO

    Reply
  109. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 30th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @Tamara:

    Yeah, and looking at that photo of her and Bradders looking all coo-ey and loved up at which ever awards do it was, it occurred to me that she has kind of been playing the role of her mother these past years. She tried to make herself look like her with the surgery and then she tried to carry herself in a more feminine, womanly way. Look at her there sat at the table with Brad, she’s acting. She’s actually better at acting in her personal life than she is professionally. Although it has to be said that she doesn’t actually open her mouth very much and givng a better performance than in her films is actually not that difficult! Can’t believe she thought she could get anywhere as a politician. But then – as I always say – there is Dubya so we could never totally rule it out! Can’t believe she is trying to play the victim now going to that stupid book lanuch. And that idiot Brad PItt is playing along with her. She will take him down with her – he is such a silly boy. If he quit her now he might escape with remnants of his career intact. They will never ride out this scandal, never. And he will be trapped forever in his misery. I can’t see this ending too well for either of them to be honest. I think this is going to be one of the most explosive scandals the celebrity world has ever seen. She is finished.

    Reply
  110. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    I read one review of Ian’s book, forgot where sorry, and it mentioned IAN’s book has the comment about Angie seducing her mother’s boyfriend at age sixteen, as well as her seducing a math teacher in high school. That’s a new one on me. If true, then Angie has used sex as her weapon of choice for most of her life. Yet, in her early interviews, she claims to have had a need to cut herself in order to reach the big O. Dang! If i needed to slice and dice to do that, i’d become celibate!@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  111. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Ted C.s Halloween Costume suggestions

    Megan Fox
    Should Go As: Angelina Jolie. She wouldn’t have to do a damn thing except draw veins on her arms and dress Brian Austin Green with a shaggyass beard and have him follow her around all night.

    Brad Pitt
    Should Go As: Brad Pitt 10 years ago. What the ef happened?

    Reply
  112. guest1 said on October 30th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Oh Keane! You overestimate Ian! He is a freak who cashes in from the life and death (in Micheal Jackson and Kurt Cubain`s case) of strangers. But while the tabloids may know certain limits – gotta consider that their main readership consists of housewives who would never put up with sordid tales – Ian knows NO limits! Nothing is too sordid or disgusting that it wouldn`t be worth making it up just to keep his handful of devoted followers! Well guess what? He is going to hurt his OWN reputation just as much if not MORE! Fact is he already did! If you remember his rape story and how he let this highschool jerk gloat about raping a teenage Jolie – that cost him a big PR opportunity.

    Reply
  113. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    Mia, this one’s for you:

    http://www.celebitchy.com/78118/brad_angelina_get_married_by_maddox_plus_triangle_drama/

    Brad and Angelina held an intimate, romantic marriage ceremony at their French chateau, with all six of their kids by their side.

    “They threw themselves a wedding for the sake of the kids,” an insider tells Star. “Maddox has been pressing his parents to get married for a long time. It wasn’t legally binding, but it was important for them to have a special ceremony to let the kids know they’re just like married people.”

    The ceremony was conducted by 8-year-old Maddox, who put Shiloh, 3, in charge of the rings. “He was adorable when he mispronounced the word ‘bearer’ and told Shiloh, ‘You’re the ring bear.’ She was thrilled,” the insider says.

    Zahara was the flower girl, Pax got to be best man and 15-month-old twins Knox and Vivienne giggled as they watch the ritual unfold in the Grand Hall of the magnificent Chateau Miraval.

    “Mad was so honored to marry Mommy and Daddy… He learned all about traditional wedding vows and memorized a lot of it. But he ended up reading off a piece of paper.” Brad and Angie also read their favorite poems and stories aloud.
    “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““

    Awwww, how cute. See? They are truly a normal, day to day , happy family who spends the school year in one place where the kids can be educated and form bonds with other children. Jolie kept her word to take a year off for Pax’s sake, so i’m sure she’s not working lately to be a better mom to her brood of six…Oh, wait! That was in my child’s Book Of Fairy Tales….

    Reply
  114. Kate said on October 30th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    I don’t know if any of you ever read Dawn Olsen of Glosslips, she is hilarious, I started reading her site after IAN had her on his chat, here is her on Jolie and Rosie -

    Rosie O’Donnel recently chatted with shock jock Howard Stern on Sirius XM Radio.

    She dished about her not so fabulous relationship with her wife lately, Oprah Winfrey and Oprah’s BFF Gail. And oh yeah… that she thought her and Angelina Jolie almost hooked up once.

    Was this wishful thinking on Rosie’s part? Or wishful thinking on Jolie’s part? Or just creepy Howard Stern with his usual everyday thoughts? *snicker*

    First, about Oprah….
    Both Rosie and Howard say they think that Oprah and BFF Gail are closer than they are letting people know.

    From EOnline:

    As for her thoughts on Oprah’s relationship with her BFF, Rosie and Howard think there may be some sparks.

    “I don’t know that she and Gayle are necessarily doing each other,” Rosie said, “but I think they are the emotional equivalent of…”

    “A gay couple,” the radio man finished.

    “When they did that road trip, that’s as gay as it gets, and I don’t mean it to be an insult either,” Rosie explained. “I’m just saying, listen, if you ask me, that’s the couple.”

    Doesn’t Howard imagine ALL women that have a relationship with another women of any kind in bed together? I can’t stand the man and he skeeves me out to no end. I bet his palms are always sweaty. EWWWW!

    As far as Rosie thinking that Oprah and Gail are a couple?
    I just think her bringing up Oprah and Gail was ridiculous and a real yawn fest.
    Although Gail would have been a BIG improvement over Stedman! (I always considered him Mr Excitement)

    Don’t get me wrong, I am not defending Oprah the Scientology cult sympathizer in any way. Even though everyone is eternally grateful to Oprah for having Cruise on her show, which led to the famous career end phrase “jumping the couch”.

    Hey Tom! How’s That Scientology Going For You Lately?

    So if you are keeping score, I find Howard Stern, Rosie AND Oprah all repulsive. Oh yeah Cruise too. All for different reasons. And none of those reasons have anything to do with sex.

    So what about Oprah’s BFF Gail? I don’t think I have EVER thought of that women before in my life in any capacity what so ever. I find her as about exciting as a fence post. Although again, she still would have been a better pick than Stedman.
    FYI…when Stedman and billionaire gal pal Oprah finally ended their 21 year old fling, he received $250 mil for his “years of ridicule and you better keep your mouth shut” severance package. Wonder what Oprah’s gal pal Gail will get? *snicker*

    So where does Angelina Jolie come into this picture?

    Well….
    Rosie told Howard that she talked to Angelina on the phone a couple of times way back when.
    Ohhhhhh! That’s where she got the idea that they were going to hook up. Who could blame her? WHAT?

    Some more help from EOnline… Rosie said,

    “She gave me her phone number,” Rosie said. “We talked on the phone two or three times, but that was that. There was a tentative plan to have dinner that never came through.”

    Fear got the best of Rosie and she wasn’t able to seal the deal.

    “I was a little afraid of her,” she said. “She’s scary in a sexual kind of way. I have dreams about her a lot still.”

    Dinner plans too? WOW! Now wonder Rosie thought that there may have been a little somethin’- somethin’ going on between them.
    Are you freakin’ kidding me?

    First off, I have to mention, that I find Angelina Jolie ALSO repulsive, and again, it has nothing to do with who she did, who she almost did, or who she is doing now. Which of course is Brad Pitt, who I can’t stand either since he hooked up with “Angelina -Jimmy- Deana”. My nickname for her because of her huge plumped up sausage-like lips. You know…. Jimmy Dean sausage?

    And secondly…. who gives a rats ass?
    Really. Sounds like Rosie is doing a little “shock jocking” herself to get some attention.
    And does anyone really want to hear about Rosie’s…. ahem….”wet dreams?”

    I think many people think that there is no way in hell that Rosie could have scored with Jolie and that Jolie is way out of Rosie’s league. You know because everyone thinks Jolie is Ms. Wonderful and her beauty is simply breath taking? *ROLLS EYES*

    But remember when Jolie kissed her brother on the lips on camera way back when? That was WAY too long of a kiss for any one’s comfort. How about her fling with Billy Bob Thorton? (ick)
    I really wouldn’t have been surprised one iota if she did actually hook up with Rosie back then. Nor would I have cared. Hell, I wouldn’t care now!

    But of course times have really changed now for Jolie. She thinks that when she poops it should be bottled as perfume. And I would imagine that Jolie would think that Rosie is not worthy of having scary sex time with her now. Besides, Jolie is saving it all for BRADLEY. *puke*

    I think it’s moronic that Rosie thought that a few phone calls and a dinner date than never happened was some sort of prelude to jumping in the sack with Jolie or anyone for that matter.

    So a word of caution people……
    If you are not into Rosie that way…. I wouldn’t talk to her on the phone. And whatever you do, don’t make any dinner plans with her. Because it will obviously be perceived as steamy foreplay and undoubtedly an invitation for sexy time.

    Unless of course, you want to hit that…..

    I wonder if IAN let her write a page in his book lol or whisper her opinion a few times! ha ha

    Reply
  115. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @guest1:
    Mia, you too are a devoted follower whether you want to accept it or not, case in point, you come out of the woodwork every single time you see the regulars come on EVERY SINGLE TIME Mia, don’t deny it deary, the proof is in the pudding

    Reply
  116. Kate said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    If they were that concerned about their children and loved each other as much as they profess they would get married, after all, Angelina keeps saying, ask Brad, practically begging him, and Brad has said many times, he believes in marriage , kiss the bride, wear the ring. He just stupidly backed himself in a corner with his big mouth. Bottom line, if they wanted to get married, they would get married. Honestly, it ridiculous for anyone to believe he is taking a stand for gay marriage , because it is going to be years and years and years before every state in the US legalizes gay marriage if ever, and that is if he meant the US, next he will say he meant all the western world,then it will be the civilized world. Well guess what, the Muslim countries will never legalize gay marriage. ever. Angelina can preach all she wants in Pakistan and these countries, but she is not going to change the fact that women get stoned to death, that fathers still have their daughters killed for less things than she has done. So, they need to get back to reality, and if they want to get married,get married and quit putting out these silly little stories. It is pathetic, and it just makes most people feel very sorry for these children. Probably the best damage control they can do at this point is to get married. Can’t testify against your wife, right? wife can’t testify against you, think Brad, think! lol

    Reply
  117. guest1 said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Tamara:

    See the difference is that I don`t buy what Ian is selling – in every sense of the word that is! While you do!

    Reply
  118. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    @guest1:
    Phew! It must be so exhausting for you if you are actually going around the internet telling off every single person who has something to say about AJ that you don’t like! I think you need a cup of tea, and a hot bubble bath!!

    Reply
  119. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Roflmboooooooooo @ JImmy Deana aka Angelina Jolie. That’s a bit classier than her other nick – @Kate:

    Reply
  120. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    If you do not like the goods, then why continue to “shop” in his store? We already understand you are intensely pro-jolie. You say you, “don’t buy what Ian is selling” Mia, this is his store.@guest1:

    Reply
  121. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    hahaha

    Reply
  122. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    MIA – if you have such a problem with Ian, then why not just go straight to the source. Email Ian and tell him how much you hate him, how vile you think he is, go for broke! Tell him how you feel. Why do you take it out on us? WE didn’t write the articles, Ian did, so tell HIM how you feel.

    Reply
  123. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    Just had a thought, doesn’t M I A stand for, Missing In Action?@Tamara:

    Reply
  124. Tamara said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Or Mistaken in Anger

    Reply
  125. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    http://www.examiner.com/x-21081-Indianapolis-Celebrity-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m10d28-Angelina-Jolie-New-tellall-book-will-end-her-career

    eXaminer.com
    Orlando

    Angelina Jolie: New tell-all book will end her career

    God Bless Ian Halperin for releasing Brangelina Exposed, a book that will let us know the truth about America’s most overexposed couple. Best of all, the book gives us insight into Angelina’s life long before she manipulated the public into believing that she’s a saint.

    According to the book, Angelina Jolie seduced her mother’s boyfriend when she was only sixteen years old. What kind of saint does something like that? The book also reveals that Angelina Jolie became very friendly with her high school math teacher, with a lot of “extra credit” involved.

    One can bet that as soon as the book is released, Angelina Jolie will be running to some Foreign country and pose with orphans in order to gain sympathy

    Reply
  126. Pattyanne said on October 30th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    Well said.@Tamara:

    Reply
  127. Kate said on October 30th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    @Tamara:
    What Mia and other people who are rattled by this book don’t get is that IAN has to have his sources cooperate 100 percent for him to use them in the book, for him to put the information in the book,or he can’t use it. He has to be able to call that person up if so challenged and say, you are up, now tell your story, and know they can and will stand behind it. That is why PR people like Bragman say these books are on target because they can not be put out there with bold face lies, or the Brange machine would shut IAN down faster than he could blink. IAN knows and they know that what goes into that book can be backed up. If Brad or Angelina or Jen or anyone else wants to step up and say, “That is not true” then they have to be prepared to sit there and listen to the source testify that it is. That source, who may be a nanny, a gardner, a hairdresser, a limo driver, a brother, a sister of someone connected , a old lover, a director or camera man they once worked with and on goes the list. This is why these people are upset. Unless they are stupid and they honestly believe he is going to just print lies and make stuff up and the book will be negated, and they think if they scream loud enough it will go away, Well NO it does not work like that. Sorry. I see have seen comments from past digrunted posters say, “oh well I am not going to buy that book it is just going to flop or get discredited” lol how does one think that is going to happen unless Brad or Angelina steps forward and says, “I did not do that” and then IAN says, well my source says you did.
    Lets go toe to toe on this and find out the truth. Now how does that happen..in court. So all these people that are pissed off at IAN for personal reasons are just being childish, and the funny thing is, in the next breath they go on and on about how they want MB to write a book and tell all and take her down. Everyone wants the truth about the Brangelina machine to come out, and why people are behaving so petty is astonishing to me.

    You can get away with putting more on a website than you can in a book, we may not see the same things in the book that we saw here, if we don’t then those stories could not be secured and possibly those were stories that he just heard about. Just as Morton said he “heard” that Jolie would climb into bed with James at night as a teenager and that he was told she slept with her mothers boyfriend. but he says that is not going in his book, why not. Maybe the person who told him will not back it up.

    Reply
  128. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 30th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    @Kate:

    Yep, basically Ian has to get them to sign-off on it and get independent corroboration otherwise his ass will be sued to within an inch of his life whether it is true or not. What people don’t seem to understand is that the veracity of the story is not the issue at stake when it comes to journalism, it is whether you can prove it or not. The world and his wife could know a story was true but unless someone has got the evidence to show it you cannot publish it. End of story. A case in point: I’m working on a story which if published will be huge with one of the leading broadsheets in the UK right now (hope that grates on your last nerve ladies of FF, I dropped it just for you). I know this stuff is true, because I was there, I witnessed all the conversations and I wrote them all down in official documents. However, if I can’t get copies of all these documents to give to the journo, it cannot be published. In fact, even if I did get all this documentation, the journo will still have to run it by the paper’s lawyers to see whether they are happy to go to press with it. Even documentation doesn’t always prove everything because often people can think of a way to explain things away. Anyone who has a vague grasp of the media knows that journos spend 90% of their time not finding the story, but trying to stand it up. And all newspapers, non-fiction authors and broadcasters work with the constant threat of being sued for anything and everything that they say. Anyone who thinks Ian could publish this book without some seriously strong, corroborated sources which will stand-up in court is an utter fool. His lawyer would NEVER let it happen. It would be unbelievably foolish and completely counterproductive (i.e. he would lose more money through litigation than he would make in book sales). There would be absolutely no way any journalist would take such an unnecessary risk. Brangelina, just like Laliberte, will sue over any detail their legal people can think of to try to destroy the credibility of the book, that is what lawyers are for (I’ll just drop another “my lawyer friends” in there I think – ha ha!). Ian is not going to make life easy for these people by using totally uncorroborated sources. So, all in all I think we would all be wise to wait for the date of publication of Ian’s book and see what legal action ensues. You can guarantee if Brange can sue over anything, they will. SO, I eagerly await their move. As the lady at The Examiner said, no amount of stop-overs in Iraq will counteract this little blockbuster! Lol

    Reply
  129. RAPUNION said on October 30th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    “решил помочь и разослал пост в соц. закладки. надеюсь поднимется популярность”

    Reply
  130. Kate said on October 30th, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    The best way to diffuse a bombshell is to tell your family and friends first,and then tell the public before someone else does.

    Mckenzie: I slept with my father the night before my wedding.

    Angie: I slept with my mother’s boyfriend when I was 16 years old.

    So did she put it out there , does she think this is the bombshell in IAN’s book?

    That would be pretty smart if that is what she is doing, although I don’t think this is his shocker because this information came out last May.

    Reply
  131. Мебель для прихожих в Москве said on October 30th, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    PruBeT. Cpacubo 3a post :)

    Reply
  132. guest1 said on October 31st, 2009 at 4:59 am

    @Kate:

    You theory falls down like a card house Kate! Just think of all those tabs putting out the most insane stories imagineable because they know what appeals to their readership! And how often are they sued? Hardly ever and if they are they are sued in the UK because the press is more restricted there! Aniston for example lets her rep deny almost every rumor but who often did she went to court because of it? Not often! It`s not worth the money and the effort – by the way the whole purpose of tabs is to make money by dishing on stars that people want to read about – its your own fault if you believe every word they write!

    Reply
  133. keane cyber queen supreme said on October 31st, 2009 at 7:55 am

    Oh Mia you’re such a dumbass, talk to someone who actually works on one of those publications first of all and then you’ll see that they don’t “just make things up to sell papers” and where most of the stories actually come from. Until then you are way out of your depth talking about something you know zero about and you’re only making yourself sound more and more ridiculous.

    BTW LMAO at that ridiculous fake Brangie wedding story! Shiloh was the “ring bear”, Maddox conducted the ceremony and the 15 month old twins “looked on and giggled” – ha ha ha! Like 15 month ols would have a clue what was going on or give a shit about it when there might be toys to play with! Yes even 15 month olds are obsessed with everything Brangelina does!!! Brangie seriously you need to sack this PR bitch stat she is either reading too many spoofs on DListed or she is clearly on meth!!!

    Reply
  134. Reaction said on October 31st, 2009 at 8:40 am

    I don’t agree a lot with mia/guest probably almost never but i think she has a point here. Tabloids do make stuff up to sell their magazine, not to long ago there was a interview with some people who worked at the tabz (they wanted to be ano) they said a story can come from a tip, a photo or out of our ass !!! (when i have more time i will look it up) Sure sometimes the stars leak stories to the tabz for publicity or for whatever reason but i think the most of the time it is bull.

    And a lot ot times the stars don’t sue is because the story is written in such a way it is hard to sue and if they sue it just will focusess (sp) publicity on the story.

    I also don’t think the same way as you about the sources for the book ian is writing about angelina and brad (and jen).

    The source can claim it is the truth but that doesn’t say it is the truth and when one of the people involved is going to sue Ian it will only increase publicity for the book and people will wonder if it is the truth because they are sueing.

    I also think that Ian made a mistake to involve jen in the book. First of all because when he is writing a book on angelina and brad why involve jen in it. I think i know the reason : money because more people will buy the book because they want to know the reason for the divorce.
    Second : For example when ian says that a source said that jen didn’t wanted to have children and that is the reason for the divorce and jen ’s rep says not true or jen doesn’t react at all then the whole book can be trown (sp) away.

    This is all my opinion nothing more.

    Reply
  135. Pattyanne said on October 31st, 2009 at 9:20 am

    I agree there are a lot of falsehoods surrounding the stars. Most have entirely fictitous bio’s on file, based on one fact, they were born. When i was searching for something about Angelina Jolie, i pulled up a Wiki Biography on her father, Jonathan Vincent Voight…in it was mention three acting children. Angie and James of course, and one who’s Christian name i’ve since forgotten, but his nickname is “Wheels”….i remarked on this to several friends, and when i went back to ccp it…..Wheels was no longer mentioned….vanished! I”m assuming he is a step brother, as no where was he mentioned regarding Angie and James in their personal data, but it shows how facts can and are manipulated in the world of Celebrity~! As for IAN’s book, i suppose i am too loyal to people i trust, and i do trust Ian to publish what he led us to believe he would. A Blockbuster Expose’ On Angie. If the book which i pre-ordered is any less than that, i will reevaluate my opinion.@Reaction:

    Reply
  136. Pattyanne said on October 31st, 2009 at 9:20 am

    I agree there are a lot of falsehoods surrounding the stars. Most have entirely fictitous bio’s on file, based on one fact, they were born. When i was searching for something about Angelina Jolie, i pulled up a Wiki Biography on her father, Jonathan Vincent Voight…in it was mention three acting children. Angie and James of course, and one who’s Christian name i’ve since forgotten, but his nickname is “Wheels”….i remarked on this to several friends, and when i went back to ccp it…..Wheels was no longer mentioned….vanished! I”m assuming he is a step brother, as no where was he mentioned regarding Angie and James in their personal data, but it shows how facts can and are manipulated in the world of Celebrity~! As for IAN’s book, i suppose i am too loyal to people i trust, and i do trust Ian to publish what he led us to believe he would. A Blockbuster Expose’ On Angie. If the book which i pre-ordered is any less than that, i will reevaluate my opinion.@Reaction:

    Reply
  137. infamous said on October 31st, 2009 at 11:10 am

    а в каком это городе,какой стране??очень креативненько!!!!!)))))

    Reply
  138. Моддинг said on October 31st, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Благодарю!!!У Вас часто появляются очень интересные посты! Очень поднимаете мое настроение.

    Reply
  139. Kate said on October 31st, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    If his publisher felt the information he uncovered was so explosive that they refused to let him out of the contract, then imo we can trust that it is. I don’t personally believe that is in relation to wild sex, but something on a entirely different level.

    The quest for help about a sting may have been a clue of what is to come, and that she was not able to attain the position she wanted in Washinton and who it was that turned her down flat. Just a thought.

    Those kind of sources can not be over come, no matter how many book signings they attend, regardless of what kind of a united front they show, a staged falling off s bike with a concerned partner for safety, or kiddies trick or treating in mommy and daddies arms. None of that will matter if the explosive information is attached to the soapbox that was placed firmly in our nations capitol, or even if it is attached to a international connection.

    Sex. Drugs, Down Lows, Surrogates. Incest, that is just filler compared to the explosion .

    Reply
  140. Amateu said on October 31st, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    Надежда на наслаждение почти так же приятна, как и само наслаждение. – У. Шекспир

    Reply
  141. Сказ said on October 31st, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    Иди посмотри хороший фильм и отдохни, я как раз написал статью о том где брать фильмы. Смотри в правом меню раздел “Страницы”, а там статью под названием “Где брать фильмы?”

    Reply
  142. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 31st, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @Reaction:

    Thanks for giving your opinion but unfortunately what you say is not true at all. Yes tabloids can try and make something out of a story which was not there by sensationalizing it or trying to make it sound like there is a big conflict when there in fact isn’t. An example of this is the stories that are written about shows like American Idol and X Factor for example – about conflicts between contestants, presenters etc. Sometimes they are true but at other times they are exaggerated or not true at all. However, the story is not necessarily being made up by the journo alone, it can often be created by the person being paid to publicise the show and leaked to them. Simon Cowell is a master at PR and always makes sure his shows attract a lot of press attention. He does this by making sure there is always a supposed rivalry or drama within the presenters or contestants. Happens every year, whether it is true or not. So yes, you are right that stories can be fabricated or exaggerated in this sense, but this is a very different type of story to the ones we are talking about here i.e. tell-alls on celebs.

    When it comes to writing about celebs tabloids have to be extremely careful. The first issue is that both celebs and their publicists wield a lot of power when it comes to the media. If a negative article is printed in a particular paper/mag about a particular celeb then they may find that not only that celeb but all the celebs represented by that agency will no longer grant interviews/exclusives to not only that paper/mag but all the papers owned by that publisher. Papers/mags tend to sell on the basis of what exclusive interviews/stories with particular individuals they have so they have to be very careful not to bite the hand that feeds them. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt for example have been the biggest sellers in the past 5 or so years (as Ian’s friend Noah said in one of his chats). While they are making the mags money they will be careful to keep them happy by not printing articles that would be likely to upset them. This is the power that Brange have over the media – their popularity and marketability with the public at large.

    While there are occasionally leaked stories from a genuine source within a celeb’s camp, 90% of the stories which say “a source said” are in reality their PR. The stories given to the press by a celeb’s PR are intended to keep them in the public eye, to promote them and sometimes to deflect from other, more negative stories which are threatening to come out. Nine times out of ten these stories are completely fabricated. A case in point: an interntionally famous British chef has a secret predilection for men despite being married with children. One of these men tries to sell a story on him to the press and has the evidence to back it up. The paper tells this celeb’s publicist that they have this story and in order to prevent it from being published, agrees to create another salacious story which will sell lots of papers but be less damaging to the celeb i.e. one about him with a woman. Voila: chef still has a career, paper made loads of cash. Simple.

    What people don’t realise is that when they read 90% of the stories and interviews about celebs in the tabloids and mags, they are reading their marketing, not real details about their lives. Celebs don’t talk to the press or have stories leaked about them on their behalf because they happen to just want to spill their guts to the general public, they do it to promote themselves and sell their products. People also don’t realise that daily or weekly mags/papers take a lot of time and work to fill with newsworthy stories and do not have high enough profit margins to pay journos to go out and uncover exciting celeb news. They very much rely on PRs phoning stories in to them and press releases. Also to go to press with a negative story about a celeb requires a lot of time and effort to be put in to make sure it checks out from a legal perspective. They could not possibly do that with all the stories that they need to fill the mag so 90% of it is the official line direct from their PR. Like TV shows, mags/papers do not have huge teams of people working on them to create some sort of groundbreaking, earth-shattering, revelatory piece of journalism every week. Their profit margins are small so everything is done on a pretty low budget. (Journos, by the way, do not make a lot of money at all!). At the end of the day, a mag/paper is a product like anything else (like a chocolate bar for example), and the point of it is to make money, not necessarily to change the world. Whether it is telling the truth or not is not as important as it being a viable business. Papers are going out of business all over the place at the moment and it is a fight for survival in the media world right now. Celebs have a lot of cash (they make ridiculous amounts through advertising which the public are generally not that aware of, even very low level people) in comparison to most papers/mags and are capable of bankrupting a publication. Remember when Jason Donovan sued over The Face suggesting he was gay? That nearly ruined the mag, they cannot afford to pay hundreds of thousands or millions of pounds to people in damages. So when celebs say that they don’t sue because they couldn’t possibly afford to do it over every untrue article that is written about them that is not true at all. They can afford to, but if they did it over one thing which they said wasn’t true and then didn’t do it over another then it would look pretty suspect wouldn’t it? So the get out is just to say “oh I couldn’t possibly sue over every little story that is not true about me”. That doesn’t mean that it is the truth though.

    And with regard to what you say about the fact that Ian’s sources may not telling the truth, well I agree that it is not possible to guarantee that they are not. However, this in no way protects Ian from being sued! He can’t go to court and say “sorry guv, they swore on their mother’s life they were telling the truth” – that will not save his ass at all! Whatever he publishes he is ultimately responsible for. Even if he has made an honest mistake and has been completely duped by someone, he can still be sued for it. Ignorance is no defence! And also, sometimes people can sue and win even if the story is in fact true. A recent case in point: Max Moseley sued the NOTW in the UK for publishing a story about the orgies he has with hookers. While it was true and they had video evidence to prove it, his lawyer successfully argued that it was an invasion of privacy and the NOTW had to pay him considerable damages. I believe Naomi Campbell did the same thing to The Mirror over the story they ran about her going to Narcotics Annonymous. It was true and they had phototgraphic evidence to prove it but she still tried to sue over it being an invasion of privacy (don’t think she won though).

    Anyhow, long old post I know but just wanted to point out that the way the press works is nothing like the public is led to believe!

    Reply
  143. Pattyanne said on October 31st, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    Considering most of Angie’s sexual escapades are common knowledge, it seems to me that the blockbuster information held in Ian’s book would have to concern legal issues, or possibly political. I honestly doubt anyone would be shocked at anything sexual Angie does any more. Hopefully what is contained in the book will be a real eye opener to those iwho continue to offer support to Brangelina and will result in a betterment of sorts for all involved. I do however, sincerely hope that Jennifer is not brought into the mix as Brangelina is Brad and Angelina, not Brad, Angelina and Jennifer, which would make it Brangeniffer….imo@Kate:

    Reply
  144. domxxx said on October 31st, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    ммм)) так клёво))

    Reply
  145. Pattyanne said on October 31st, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    Bless you~! (devil made me do it)@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  146. Liz E. said on October 31st, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Your understanding of defamation law in the U.S. is incorrect. When I have more time I can elaborate.

    Reply
  147. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 31st, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Keep on my tail as best you can Liz E. – after all nothing else has worked has it? Despite Angelina’s VERY best efforts(!). Hey, we all know what she does best don’t we?!

    Not surprised about you not having too much time on your hands right now though. It’s coming from all directions lately isn’t it? Bet it’s keeping you up all night.

    (That book launch attendance was desperate BTW. Actually, correction: it wasn’t desperate, it was tragic. Keep pulling those little stunts and the world is going to look back and see exactly what fools Brangelina have been making of them all this time. It’s like you’ve been going over it all with a highlighter pen for emphasis lately. Subtlety is not your middle name is it?! Brangelina are digging their own grave right now, and you are handing them the shovel).

    Keep me posted on the defamation law thing though. That’ll help.

    Reply
  148. Бейсболист said on October 31st, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    Следите за пульсом блогосферы на Яндекс-Блоги? Оказывается скоро Татьянин день.

    Reply
  149. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 31st, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Hey AC from IUC just wanted to say thanks for reading my posts as faithfully as you do and CCP-ing it on FF for the benefit of the resident whack-job conspiracy theorists!!! Love it. Yup, hate to break it to you but I never used to read FF because I thought it was the home of a load of idiots such as yourself who make it their mission in life to dissect and slam every word I utter. Unlike you I have much better things to do with my time than read that I can assure you! My good cyber friends though mentioned that you had all gone even more batshit crazy than usual and thought I was spending my days trolling your tragic IUC Hostility thread to get you back for what I’m not quite sure. When I read it I found it so funny it had me in stitches for hours I have to say – I think it was actually one of the most entertaining things I have read on the internet in my whole life in fact! Lol And when I read the even more entertaining “Are IUC Rejects Ruining this Forum?” (answer: yes) thread I realised there were at least a few sane people posting there! Kate has always said that the guests posting on FF knew there stuff and I completely agree with her. They’re more on to the wiles of the Brangelina than most of the press are. So I will continue to read and enjoy the FF threads when I choose as funnily enough it is a free world and I can do what I damn well please! Which includes laughing on a regular basis at you losers! Lots of love Kxx

    Reply
  150. guest1 said on October 31st, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Thanx for admitting that the tabs write bullshit 9 out of 10 times and that they don`t have the resources or the time to check the “facts”. That is exactly what i meant! The only problem with this is that 98% of all In Touch Weekly stories are negative for Brangelina – they have them fighting and splitting up. So I very much doubt that their rep would leak that kind of stories. If at all I see a rep of someone who dislikes them leaking them. Who could that be hm? One of the most powerful reps in Hollywood is Huvane who happens to represent Aniston. So if you are looking for a source of those stories – why not consider someone who profits from them the most – and that is certainly NOT Brangelina! Those kind of stories don`t put butts into movie seats – because the housewives who are the main readership of gossip mags don`t watch the kind of movies Pitt and Jolie make – they prefer romantic comedies – which happen to be Jen`s favorite genre.

    Guess what. I read an interesting story on the internet about a british journalist who wanted to check the “research work” of some wellknown tabs. So he and a friend called the tab and told them a fictive story about them working for a moving company and stumbling about some compromising photos featuring Amy Whinehouse. Guess what that stroy got printed without being checked. Scary hm? While I forgot the exact details – it shows just how trustworthy those tabs are! Anyone who has a story that SOUNDS like it could be true and a source that confirms his/her infos can make it inside the pages of a gossip mag!
    And I am not saying that nothing is true – just that it is almost impossible to distinguish between lies, slobby researched “facts”, hearsay and halftruth. So why bother with that? Time usually shows which rumors were just that and which turn out to be true!

    Reply
  151. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 31st, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @guest1:

    No Mia, I didn’t say they didn’t have time to check the facts, I said they didn’t have time to do investigative pieces that go against the grain and uncover the lies behind a celebrity’s PR, which is why they usually stick to the PR-fed stories. They sell the paper and they aren’t going to get sued over them so everyone is a winner aren’t they? And BTW, you completely fail to understand the complexities of the PR game if you think stories about Brangelina splitting are harmful to the separate and individual celebrities known as Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, especially when they have been that way for quite some time. Their PRs have been paving the way for the split announcement for quite some time now, making up silly reasons for fights and giving ludicrous accounts of what he said and she said. Angelina’s PR has been trying to make her client look like the victim in this scenario for quite some time now with all the “poor Angie” stories and shocking allegations of Brad’s outrageous and irresponsible drinking exploits (so much more outragoues than other such things such as a serious and long-term drug addiction hey?). Brad, like the sucker he has always been, has not been fighting back that much, perhaps to protect the children or perhaps because he fears the exposure of a few of his not-so-little secrets who knows? And did you not read the part about PR’s inventing negative stories to cover up another real story that would be far more damaging or did you choose to ignore that?

    And no, Mia-loon, Jennifer Aniston’s rep does not leak stories about Brad and Angelina. That would be pretty difficult considering he does not work for either of them and cannot attest to the veracity of anything he says about anyone other than Jen. Do you understand how it works now Mia? Reps leaks stories to the press about their own clients, not other people’s! They cannot make up stories about someone else and just ring up a paper and get them to print it. That would be as libellous as you or I calling them up and giving them a made-up story. Yes Angelina’s PR can call up the press and leak a sympathetic piece to them about Angie and imply that all her and Brad’s troubles are caused by her insecurity over Jennifer Aniston, but they cannot make up a story about Jennifer and ask them to print it, because Jennifer could and would sue over that. Do you understand the difference?

    I’m sorry to break it to you Mia but this is the way it works. Get your head out of the loon sand.

    Reply
  152. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 31st, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    @guest1:

    Oh and BTW your story would be interesting if you could remember where it was reported so we could ascertain whether it was in fact a reliable source of information and whether it was in fact true or not. Hazy, half-remembered, unverified facts are not exactly a solid ground on which to make an assessment are they? And no, you are completely wrong there, there is a way to distinguish between what is and isn’t true and that is thinking about how that story made it into the press, why it has been placed there, who it is biased against and whose interests it may serve. Once you’ve done that you may start to see the wood from the trees a little bit.

    And as for your last point, well I think you’ve pretty much summed up my problem with you (apart from the obvious) there in a nutshell. You say you KNOW everything Ian has posted on his blog is not true and nothing will convince you otherwise. I say wait for the book and let’s see who sues over what and who can prove what in a court of law. But thus far you have refused to accept that option and will not let it drop. So now Mia, I suggest you start taking your own advice and wait for Ian’s book to come out and for Brangelina to respond before making your judgments. As you say: “Time usually shows which rumors were just that and which turn out to be true!”, so I think we both know exactly what you should now do – don’t we?

    Reply
  153. Травин said on October 31st, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    С чистым юмором.

    Reply
  154. моделирован said on October 31st, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    Считаете себя современным человеком и хотите знать всё, о товарах и услугах которыми сегодня изобилует потребительский рынок? Посетите наш web-сайт, где есть множество статей, прочитав которые вы узнаете мнение профессионалов практически о любом товаре современного рынка.

    Reply
  155. Glynis said on October 31st, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    I’m gettin’ both. Can’t wait!!!

    Reply
  156. RegDoctor said on October 31st, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    Вот решил вам немного помочь и послал этот пост в социальные закладки. Очень надеюсь ваш рейтинг возрастет.

    Reply
  157. Бухгалтер said on October 31st, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    Очень интересно! Судя по некоторым откликам ….

    Reply
  158. biggie said on October 31st, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    You are all wrong. The truth is a great defense under all circumstances so if you leak a true story, which people do all the time, you are OK. There a great sense of revenge in leaking a true story to the tabs. Been there, done that.

    Reply
  159. Шутер said on October 31st, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Автор выйди к напроду, вопросы есть!

    Reply
  160. Дизайнер said on October 31st, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    Блог отличный, буду рекомендовать друзьям!

    Reply
  161. unittrucks said on November 1st, 2009 at 12:24 am

    Думаю любому понравится!

    Reply
  162. Информатик said on November 1st, 2009 at 1:32 am

    Портал просто замечательный, буду рекомендовать всем знакомым!

    Reply
  163. Этикет said on November 1st, 2009 at 2:28 am

    Не знаю как вам, а мне нравится! Вот.

    Reply
  164. futurman said on November 1st, 2009 at 3:58 am

    круто..взяла почти все))

    Reply
  165. Механик said on November 1st, 2009 at 5:07 am

    Спасибо за статью.. Актуально мне сейчас.. Взяла себе еще перечитать.

    Reply
  166. mooki said on November 1st, 2009 at 6:06 am

    http://forums.whyweprotest.net/305-tom-katie/katie-holmes-paid-250-000-year-support-scientology-55619/

    Katie Holmes getting paid $250,000 a year to “support” $cientology. see, it’s just another acting gig…

    Reply
  167. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 1st, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    @biggie:

    Not true, you need proof. If you don’t have evidence to demonstrate that what you are saying is the truth then a newspaper will not print it. I know this very well because I am in the process of doing it right now. Saying something is true and being able to prove it is are two totally different things.

    Reply
  168. Togi said on November 1st, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    What’s with the Russian language posts? Erm … uh … DOH! I don’t get it.

    Reply
  169. Togi said on November 1st, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Hey Keane! How are you doing this fine first day of November? You sure are busy little Cyber Queen, aren’t you? LOL

    Reply
  170. Tamara said on November 1st, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @моделирован:
    Not that any of you are just DYING to know what this says but here’s the translation. Someone selling something I think:

    You do consider itself contemporary person and you do want to know all, about the goods and the services with which does today abound consumer market? You will visit our web- site, where there is many articles, after reading which you learn the opinion of professionals practically about any goods of contemporary market.

    Reply
  171. Togi said on November 1st, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @Tamara:
    Thanks Tam. The site is being SPAMMED! LOL. Guess no one is exempt. Makes me feel soooo much better about my personal email box! :-)

    Reply
  172. lizzieb said on November 1st, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    But being spammed in another language is less annoying.It’s like people in trains on their mobile phones- they only annoy me if I can understand them.

    Reply
  173. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 1st, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Togi:

    God yeah, tell me about it. I have an interminable to do list that I never get anywhere near finishing. Life is very complicated lately!

    Reply
  174. AC said on November 1st, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Erm Keane I haven’t CC’d your post…..Nefarious Poster has though…

    Reply
  175. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 1st, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @AC:

    Yeah you did sweetheart, I read it yesterday. Did you do a quick edit? I’d stick to the PM option if I were you. Ta ra.

    Reply
  176. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 1st, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    @AC:

    Oh and thanks for remaining a constant and devoted reader of IUC and my posts!

    Reply
  177. benjaminbutton14 said on November 1st, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @Togi:
    bb14. I was wondering that myself what’s it mean?

    Reply
  178. Astro said on November 1st, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    IAN: Ok…Has anybody bought STARMAGAZINE?….MARRIED WITH CHILDREN!!!!….Brad and Angelina exchanged vows in a touching family ceremony at their French chateau. Now they are going to make the “I do’s Official!!!.

    & Don’t tell now, that’s Star is a lier!!!!!

    Reply
  179. Astro said on November 1st, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    Irreparable Tension????.

    Brad, Angelina And The Kids Trick Or Treating!EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS: Brad, Angelina And The Kids Trick Or Treating!

    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/11/exclusive-photos-brad-angelina-and-kids-trick-or-treating

    The true in pictures!!!!

    Reply
  180. AC said on November 1st, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    No, Keane, I didn’t. I’d have no issues admitting it if I had. I haven’t edited any of my posts and I don’t PM. But thanks for the shout-out, Sweet-cheeks.

    Reply
  181. Astro said on November 1st, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    More Irreparable Tension!!!.

    The Brangelina Brood Goes Trick or Treating!

    http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/brangelina-brood-goes-trick-or-treating-2009111

    Reply
  182. Ms Agatha said on November 1st, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    Irreparable Tensions ? They are so hammered, they feel no pain no more …..chemically incovienieced can be a blessing ….for the miserable . More trickery than treaty LOL

    Reply
  183. Alif said on November 2nd, 2009 at 2:16 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    An excellent reply, I must say!
    Veddy, Veddy Clever!

    Ian, the new title of your book is, imo, rather unexciting.

    Reply
  184. lizzieb said on November 2nd, 2009 at 4:45 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    …’chemically incovienieced can be a blessing ‘ Love that phrase! I’ve got bloody swine flu and could do with a nice dose of chemicals. However, as confined to house and what neighbours can bring me will stick to fruit and healthy things. Don’t want talk at the school gates that ‘when Lizzie was sick she asked me to pick up red wine!’ Thank goodness kids OK so can wallow in self pity.

    Reply
  185. Astro said on November 2nd, 2009 at 6:37 am

    OH…..Come on people: Don’t breathe on the wound!!!!.

    From your posts: “I can see your pain”.

    It is the TRUE IN PICTURES….I am sorry IAN!

    Reply
  186. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 2nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @lizzieb:

    Oh Lizzieb you got the pig flu too? Is there no end to your troubles?! It can only be upwards from here!xx

    Reply
  187. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 2nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @AC:

    Got to love that loyalty! I need to start charging for this!

    Reply
  188. JediMasterOverBragenlina said on November 2nd, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @guest1:Angie and Brad are part of the One World Government plan to dominate the globe. Her work as a UN rep is proof positive of this. The UN is nothing more than a front for the globalist agenda which has been done in secret and conspires to decimate the third world countries and depopulate the world. Believe what you want but I see the writing on the wall from Hollywood. They’ve been telling us for years.

    Worship those in the “Empire” if you want to; however, I strive to fight them with all my being. These globalist assh*les are nothing but scum on the bottom the of the pond. While they prance around the globe pretending to do good works, stealing children and popping out more babies to become tabloid fodder, I watch this mess and know in my heart as my intuition tells me, that these people are evil plain and simple.

    enjoy the show while it lasts. The last of the knights of old are here to bring this NEW WORLD ORDER down once and for all.

    Brangelina will roast in the fires of their own hell.

    Reply
  189. Togi said on November 2nd, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Astro:
    You’re funny, Astro. I like you and am glad you’re here to represent another view point! :-)

    Reply
  190. Togi said on November 2nd, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    @lizzieb:
    Sorry to hear you’ve caught the piggy, lizzieb. It took me almost 5 weeks to recover from the Pig and the pneumonia that came with it. Beware of the cough … and TAKE CARE OF YOURSELF!!!!

    Reply
  191. Reaction said on November 2nd, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Tell-all author Ian Halperin set to launch new book on Brangelina
    (CP) – 4 hours ago

    MONTREAL — A tell-all author who chronicled Michael Jackson’s last days has set his sights on celebrity power couple Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie in a new book out just in time for Christmas.

    Transit Publishing, which is releasing “Brangelina” on Dec. 1, says author Ian Halperin went undercover at “great personal risk” to tell the behind-the-scenes story of Pitt and Jolie.

    The publishers say the book tells the story behind Pitt’s breakup with actress Jennifer Aniston and Jolie’s volatile life.

    They promise the real story behind Jolie’s metamorphosis into one of Hollywood’s most influential philanthropists and United Nations goodwill ambassador.

    Halperin is said to have conducted “intimate interviews with those closest to the stars” to get his material and the book is a “critical, gripping, shocking, yet sympathetic” portrait.

    Halperin, a Montreal native, recently released “Unmasked: The Final Years of Michael Jackson,” which became a New York Times bestseller
    http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadi … pn6QaKaQyA

    Reply
  192. Kate said on November 2nd, 2009 at 8:19 pm

    influential philanthropists – ha ha could not get the appointment she wanted, she got a big fat NO

    yes IAN has a soft heart, but still..

    Marketing 101

    we will see..

    Reply
  193. Togi said on November 2nd, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    “critical, gripping, shocking, yet sympathetic” portrait of AJ? It’s hard to believe that anything would be shocking about her! The “sympathetic” part is what bothers me.

    Reply
  194. lizzieb said on November 3rd, 2009 at 5:59 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    @Togi:
    Thanks. I started on Tamiflu right away so am hoping it won’t get worse. Keane- I do wonder what will happen next!
    Now, back to the book. I too am worried by ’sympathetic’ it seem to me that the world’s press has fallen over itself to put these two idiotic selfish home wrecking baby buyers in a sympathetic light so a bracing dose of unsympathetic may be called for!

    Reply
  195. Pattyanne said on November 3rd, 2009 at 9:30 am

    If there is an “overdose” of sympathy for Angie and Brad publications, then we , the public, will know that we do not need to bother ourselves reading dribble they print, as we can discern the truth ourselves. Reading publications for more details of what we already know somewhat is what we wish, not to be spoon fed a bunch of press release dribble to cover up horrendous acts against others and create a false image for these celebs. I’m anxiously waiting for my edition to be delievered Dec. 3. If i find that Ian has white washed and diluted the reality of what Brangelina is, i will know for certain he has sold out his integrity as an author. At that time i will no longer respect any of his information in the future. It’s as Angelina Jolie has said herself, “It is what it is”, she offers no excuse, offers no shame or regret for her abhorrent acts toward other, in particular her subversive attempts to damage Jennifer Aniston, her adoptions of “orphans” with living parents, her hard hearted non parenting of those poor children ripped from native lands and people. How can one offer sympathy to such a human being as she?@lizzieb:

    Reply
  196. lizzieb said on November 3rd, 2009 at 10:46 am

    @Pattyanne:
    Well said. I feel no sympathy for her, the himbo and the selfish people (i.e government officals who ‘bend’ adoption rules) who enable them. I also have no sympathy for the loons who will believe anything, including that Bradders could adopt Zahara a few months into an adulterous relationship whilst married to someone else. Is it really the revenge of the outsider on the prom queen that they swallow this stuff whole? I hope Ian doesn’t whitewash it either. There must be enough dirt on those people to write a book the size of a doorstop.

    Reply
  197. Kate said on November 3rd, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    @lizzieb:
    When I think back to all the little comments and clues that have been made on here, I would not be at all surprised if Ted C did not offer some support to IAN as far as some of her past shennigans, at least as far as some of the illegal homegrown things she may have gotten herself into.

    IAN has said before that Brad has not been at peace and that Angelina was a vixen as a young girl , and probably taken advantage of. We knew that already, and so we reviewed some of that lately, so none of that will be shocking to any of us. What ever hidden secret Brad is harboring as well I don’t think will really shock anyone here.

    Would it surprise anyone to find he had mixed feelings in revealing the shocking things she has done, not me. That does not mean he did not reveal it. imo he did when he adivsed just how deep he had gone and just how much he knew and said, here is your chance to quit looking back and look forward, she spit in his face. He was not offering to leave out the info, to me it sounded more like he was offering to let her tell her side and she refused. jmo of coure, idk.

    He goes on to hint that they are undecided as to where to raise the kids or who will raise the kids and that Brad seems to be in control.

    He ends it with telling us that Brad is in control again, albeit confused and not sure exactly what to do and what is more impotant to him and so the triangle continues.

    I may be completely wrong, but my bet is that IAN will tell all , as much as he can without going to jail himself . He will also be sympathetic in the sense that anyone would be , the same way you would be to any other person who has mental problems and drug problems and suicidal tendencies. That does not mean she is off the hook, that there is no justice for those wronged, that there is no consequences for the bad behavior. Anyone that has had enough sense to manipulate the press and her image all the while continue doing drugs, and all the things she says she has given up, certainly is bright enough to know she needs to get help, counseling and stop doing those things if for no other reason, those six beautiful children. That alone, she gets no slack at all, but that does not mean she gets no compassion for what she may have endured at one point in her life.

    I have read all of her interviews, her journals that she wrote while visiting the refugees, and it is almost as though she has two different personalities. I can easily see how one can feel sorry for her, get taken in and say “poor Angie” until you realize what she has done just in the last five years.

    I personally do not believe IAN has been bought off as so many are speculating, I don’t believe he has slanted this book in a postive way to make Angelina look good. I think it will most likely rip her wonderful image she thinks she has to pieces, and have great sympathy for doing so. IAN has always believed in redemption, he has said that many times, not just here but in the other books he has written, of course one has to be well deserved of that. To date if even half of what he told us in the last six months is true, she has not redeemed herself, not even as a mother. IAN has a soft heart , anyone that has been a loyal poster here knows that. I am sure it is not easy to know where to draw the line in a book like this, after all, it is a little bit like playing God with other peoples lives. Sometimes one has to do that, it is much like
    intervention when one will not cooperate. Hopefully this will force her to get the help she needs and to be a good mother. Hopefully no one else will allow her to adopt again , at least until she is on track.

    Hopefully.

    jmo though. time will tell.

    Reply
  198. Pattyanne said on November 3rd, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    True lizzie, we all grow up and learn the responsibilities for our actions rest strictly on ourselves, and thus we formulate a pattern to adopt the rules and laws of society. Otherwise we are nothing more or less than the wild beasts in the jungles, who react, and act upon natural instinct. It’s very hard to give sympathy to a person who has proven to have no emotional investment in the lives of six children she parades around the world for publicity opportunities to further her image. Sympathy? For her? No, but most certainly for those children . I also feel that any person, no matter what their lot in life, who knows of such illegal transactions concerning children, or any other act of abuse toward a child, who does nothing is in fact aiding and abetting, and just as guilty of crimes against humanity. I think those how posted a long time ago that Jolie has a Borderline Personality Disfunction is correct. Jolie presents two totally different personalities to the world, and to her family. As her father said, they recognized she was mental as a very young child. He has also gone on record during the Maddox adoption process as asking for mental health care for his daughter. Yet, she manipulates those in positions to make a difference, force a change for the better , into going along with her will. Pissed Off Girl Who Didn’t Get To Drive Her Own Car In High School, or Attend The High School Prom With The Quarterback….ack! She’s a mentally incapacitated, narcissistic biotch imo. Sympathy for her? Never.@lizzieb:

    Reply
  199. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 3rd, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @Kate:

    Nothing will ever excuse her exploitation of refugees from the most dangerous, hopeless and desolate regions of the world (Somalia is the one that bothers me the most) and vulnerable young orphans to market herself as a movie star. It is morally utterly outrageous and there is no excuse or justification for it, whatever happened to her in her childhood. My ethics are black and white on this matter and I can not support someone who does not share them. Everyone deserves the possibilty of redemption at some polnt in their life, but they have to take the consequences of their actions and the punishment for it first. She must not be allowed to get away scott free for what she has done just because her parents might have been dreadful. I’ve met worse parents, and their offspring did not turn out to do evil, morally reprehensible things like her. It is disgraecful to me that this woman is held up as the leading female icon of our times. She makes me embarrassed to be female and embarrassed to be part of the society that has bought into this person. So, no forgiveness from me yet. Not for a good long while.

    Reply
  200. Ms Agatha said on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    @Pattyanne
    @Keane

    I agree with both of you. I have neither sympathy for her nor forgiveness to offer . I like to see some consequences first. Redemption may be at the end of a very, very long road, maybe .

    Reply
  201. Ms Agatha said on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    We will not have to wait much longer to find out where everybody stands on this . Actually, I am glad the waiting game is nearly over. It’s been going on far too long. My hope is, that Ian’s book will be the avalanche which brings the mountain down LOL

    Reply
  202. Tamara said on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    The Daily Mail says Brangelina will expose their present, and Andrew Mortons book will expose her past…so I’m wondering are Ian and AM tag teaming on this endeavor???

    Reply
  203. Ms Agatha said on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    ….. The truth about the Brand is much more nuclear to me than her past , which is just an afterthought @Tamara:

    Reply
  204. Ms Agatha said on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    We, the public can start not showing up to her movies ….. voting with our wallets will be a great tool to teach her a lesson . Let’s start staying home ….lol

    Reply
  205. Pattyanne said on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    LOL Aggie, i started that when they filmed MAMS and the word came out. I did not pay to see MAMS, Wanted, IGB, CCBB, JJATC, not one of their films since the beginning. I have morals and integrity, and paying money which goes to the pockets of such emotional and physical thieves is something i refuse to do. Besides, most of their movies go straight to HBO anyway….lolol@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  206. Ms Agatha said on November 3rd, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    …hahaha… same here…. last one I saw was MAMS and that was on HBO I believe lol…. rather spend that money on a nice drink …or two lol … can’t watch them ‘ act ‘ without cringing anyway ….her lollipop head and his voice just want to make me get up and run….

    Reply
  207. Pattyanne said on November 3rd, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    I know~! What is so weird is how quickly she sucked the “sexy hunk” out of him. He isn’t anyone i’d even have a wet dream about now. Hard to believe just over four years of hell, oops, relationship with Jolie and six kiddies has turned him into an old, worn out looking grandpa character now. If i’d seen him the the Tokyo airport today i’d have offered him a dollar for some coffee or a shave. Poor Brad….he must look in the mirror and ask himself what the hell was i thinking????

    Reply
  208. Pattyanne said on November 3rd, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    BTW….the next time Troy is on, watch it, not too bad a film, but you will see the pre-Angelina Brad, right before she used her vacuum (va-ja-ja) lips to entrap him. Why do i envision her female part being like a Venus Fly Trap??@Pattyanne:

    Reply
  209. Alif said on November 3rd, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    It was widely reported when “Troy” came out that Braddie had a body double for shots of his thighs.
    Also some of the so-called hunk scenes were digitalized.

    Reply
  210. Kate said on November 3rd, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Yes, I totally agree with that, I am not clear on the assessment as to why she is considered infuenital in our times, to whom? lol I don’t believe she will ever get help myself, but who knows. She has to want to and we know the answer to that.

    Reply
  211. Kate said on November 3rd, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Consequences, that is where I have my doubts, will there be any? I will jump for joy, but somehow I think Trevor thinks he has positioned her so that she has paid her dues. Sorry. but all those people in prison that have redeemed themselves whether through faith or good works by teaching or education or writing books, they still still their butts their , they don’t get pardoned, and niether should Angelina, because she still has not stopped what she is doing, and that was what I was trying to say. If and when she does stop, and asks for help and forgiveness, and truly from the heart and shows she is serious about being true to her children and to her causes, then redemption is her. jmo though. but now no. but compassion for what she endured as a child, yes, do have, no child should have to endure any thing remotely like that. Keane is right though, many have and they do not all become child abusers, or druggies, or serial killers , some or as normal as you and I. jmho.

    Angelina of all people knows the difference in right and wrong. “I like to think I am a decent person”

    hmm

    Reply
  212. Pattyanne said on November 3rd, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    Awww, shux, and here i thought he has such awesome thighs in that leather kilt he wore in Troy. Well, he had one heck of a good looking body double then. It’s a shame the body doubles of stars don’t get much credit for their ….ah….ass ets….wink!!@Alif:

    Reply
  213. Tokyo Rose said on November 3rd, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    AJ was a movie star before she did such charity work. And what are YOU doing for the children of Somalia? Me, I will admit I’m doing NOTHING so I can’t really sit in judgment of those who are…
    And no, I’m not a fan of this woman, but I don’t profess to know much about her because I don’t know her, and I’d just as soon keep it that way. I personally don’t admire her lifestyle of child collecting ant contstant travel. It’s not something I’d ever do, but if it works for her, why should I or most especially YOU care????

    Reply
  214. Vittoria said on November 3rd, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    @Alif:
    I saw more than I wanted to of those thighs in the shorts, white socks and shoes in France. Yum!

    Reply
  215. Ms Agatha said on November 3rd, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    A pathological unprincipled narcissist like her is unable to stop what she is doing , mind you asking for forgiveness . She will always be the way she is. I have known too many whose childhood sufferings put hers to shame . And they have not – as Keane already said – developed a pathological persona. This kind of personality trait is best served if one put as many miles as possible between such an individual and oneself – and never look back. Sorry, but I have no empathy for her. Narcissists know right from wrong. That’s why in the court of law they are held responsible for criminal actions. Narcissism is no defense in the legal system. She needs to be held responsible for her actions in the public mind . Trevor, I am sorry, as little say in this. When her ship sinks ….mind you…. he will no longer be around to watch the end. @Kate:

    Reply
  216. Ms Agatha said on November 3rd, 2009 at 11:29 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    hahaha…… I start to think that he makes himself purposely look like trailer trash….. so she and her venus fly trap leave him alone ….. it must be a survival mechanism lol

    Reply
  217. Kate said on November 4th, 2009 at 12:22 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    You have to wonder, don’t you, how all, including grandparents can stand by and allow her to take custody of all of the children, if and when Brad leaves, and it is not likely he will be there forever.

    Reply
  218. Alif said on November 4th, 2009 at 12:35 am

    @Vittoria:
    But you realize it wasn’t his thighs?

    Reply
  219. Alif said on November 4th, 2009 at 12:38 am

    @Alif:
    To futher comment: A few yrs ago it was prominently in the celeb news that not a few actors were using body doubles for nude scenes. And that the computer was used for other scenes to enhance what needed to be enhanced.

    Reply
  220. mooki said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:38 am

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1225066/Nicole-Kidman-reveals-love-life-kinky-opens-strange-sexual-fetish-encounters.html
    has Nicole Kidman been fair gamed? She refuses to talk about the intimate details of her “marriage” to Cruise…

    Reply
  221. jan/sa said on November 4th, 2009 at 7:10 am

    i totally agree that to get forgiveness you must be sorry for what you have done. and as for pee brain he is just as bad and i hope they stay together as that keeps anybody else from having to live with these two morons. i don’t care if jen had slapped pitt stupid but the way he peraded his girlfriend around and all the photo ops they did as well as the w shoot whether for the movie or not he should have tried to make the divorce quite and waited with his baby and adoption plans at lest till the divorce was final. he and jolie threw jen under the bus and let her take all the heat. only once did he sort of mumble that the stories where not true but then with his comment of ‘ ALL MY BITCHES ARE MAD AT ME ” undid that little effort. i have never really watched either one of their movies before this whole dispicable affair and will never watch or spend a penny on their films because in mo they cannot act and have no screen value. and i really think somebody should tell this aging man that the beaded look is not for the aging man that looks like a 55 year old it just makes him look retarded and in the throws of denail because his looks have been sucked out of him. can he not age like gc or richard geer they are still hot hot hot because they lived a good life.. he is not johonny depp and never will be in depps league so please pee brain give it up and age gracefully or at least try. jmo

    Reply
  222. lizzieb said on November 4th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    @jan/sa:
    Good point. Depp looks wonderful and I could not pick out his children in a line up if my life depended on it. So, to all those loons who bleat that the paps track this poor holy family down how is it that we never see the Depp/Paradise family? Do they live in a bunker underground? Do they live on a remote mountain top where food is delivered monthly? Holie and Stupitt parade those kids around like handbags and should feel shame. They don’t, it makes them the heaps of money that their careers never will. One thing I always wonder is why their films bomb with such loyal fans.One can only assume they are too large to leave the house without the assistance of the emergency services which make sseeing a film very expensive.

    Reply
  223. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    I adore Jonny Depp~! He’s my idea of a sexy male. And what a fantastic father he is, when his daughter was so ill, he quit all work and rushed to be with her during the entire thing. He’s real. Many other celebs could take a lesson from that man. Ya listening Angie and Brad??@lizzieb:

    Reply
  224. mia said on November 4th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    @lizzieb:

    If you never saw his kids that is because you reserve 99% percent of your freetime for Brangelina. I saw several pix of Depp`s children nd his wife and I also read an interview were he talks in great lenght about his family. And don`t get me started with other celeb kids particulary Suri Cruise!

    Reply
  225. lizzieb said on November 4th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @mia:
    Ha ha ha ha. 99%, that’s a cracker. I ‘d have to be blind in both eyes not to see the holi-shitts everywhere you go. ‘Several’ pics of kids who have been on earth for what- 10 years? hardly compares to the wholesale marketing of the bought kids, the chosen one and the Clomid twins. I do agree about Suri Cruise tho’ – she is in the media a ridiculous amount and she gives me the creeps. As soon as she is taller than her daddy, about another year or so I would guess, she is going to make a run for it and write a great tell all book.

    Reply
  226. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 4th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Constant Gardener/Keane’s Cat/GUESTTTT/Lavonda Faylene/Righht etc and your pardner in crime TK/watching and waiting/Bitsey etc, I know you love us and all but can you please stop snooping on our private conversations? 1000 views in a few days is a bit much don’t you think. In the words of Michael K, “Bitch please, you are embarrassing yourself”, please try to get a life one day. And as for your “contacts at blogspot” (weeks old and it still makes me LOL, as well as “in telesales it is all about relationships yano”!), I hope they aren’t depending on the work. They may well not have it for much longer. I’m sure your great contacts will thank you from the bottom of their heart!

    Reply
  227. Togi said on November 4th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Thanks for putting this out there, Keane. It is very unnerving to have your private “home” broken into. It’s also unnerving that someone would go to the lengths they so obviously have to track down a few bloggers who simply want a quiet, peaceful place to share their thoughts without having to post IMO, JMO, etc. Shame on you, Peeping Tom!

    Reply
  228. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    I find it very telling that so many reviewers of Ian’s new book, Brangelina: Exposed, are pointing out Brad’s hash use, and heavy drinking all the while ignoring Angelina well documented heroin and methadone adictions. Amazing isn’t it? Or very telling. So if one adds the Heroin and Methadone useage to the Promiscuity, and add to that the self inflected wounding we get one totally screwed up human being who is responsible for the lives of six little persons. So Brad smokes Hash and has a Beer…..I would too!!

    Reply
  229. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 4th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Plus Jen seems to still be being dragged in to it. Yes we know Angelina, you are TORTURED by that evil witch whose husband you stole and whose career you tried to destroy right? Yes, we know. And no mention of James, the illegal adoptions, that the kids call their nanny mom, Madonna, how you exploit refugees for press, how you are far from the philanthropist you claim to be and how you buy off the press etcetera hey? How bloody curious. Guess that “mouthwatering hospitality” worked hey Ange? They don’t call them blow-job lips for nothing.

    Reply
  230. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 4th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    Although I will say congrats on the Star cover though Ian. Just hope that Angie didn’t orchestrate it.

    Reply
  231. mia said on November 4th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @lizzieb:

    Strange I only saw the twins on THREE occasions – at the People photoshoot, at the Tolyo airport and in a cellphone photo in an ice cream shop. Did you drink too much – seems like you see double – eh daily photo reports about the twins were there are none!

    Reply
  232. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 4th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    Also, just saw the Salt trailer and while I will concede that she looks pretty in it (but nowhere near the age she claims to be of course, more like pushing 40), it is, even for her, one of the worst examples of an acting “performance” I have ever seen. She is not just acting like a wooden sex doll (as in all previous action flicks), but a lazy one at that. It’s like she can’t even be bothered to do wooden vixen so is just phoning it in. That movie is going to bomb. No doubt.

    Reply
  233. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 4th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @mia:

    Yeah lizzieb was talking about all the children in their entirety mia, not just the (not really) “twins”. Even you’re not stupid enough to misunderstand a simple sentence. I take it that was all you could think of to come back with though. You are scraping the dregs of that barrel mia.

    Reply
  234. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    With the series of photos taken at the photo op in syria it was obvious when comparing the same side profle of Knox to that of Viv there is a major difference! Knox’s forehead protrudes quite far, while Viv’s is similiar to what Shiloh’s was. They could be cousins perhaps, but twins? Nope, not even fraternal imo

    Reply
  235. mia said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Even all the kids in their “entirety” don`t come close to the amount of pix released showing Suri Cruise and her parents. But thanx for confirming that the twins were hardly ever pictured!

    Reply
  236. Chris G. said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    NEW Star magazine cover: “Angie & Brad’s DARK SECRETS EXPOSED! A shocking new book reveals their fairy tale life is a sick sham that’s about to explode!”

    IUC seven months ago: “IUC Easter Monday World Exclusive: Brangie is Finished – Pitt and Jolie Officially Split!!! Marriage is Over!!!(Email this to Everyone You Know) – A four week IUC investigation has revealed that Hollywood glamor couple Brangelina has called it quits…”

    Can’t help but wonder, what will the Brangelina stories say in seven months from now? A year from now? Five years from now?

    Reply
  237. mia said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Twins that are NOT identical – are no closer then any other siblings! By the way they share the same big blue eyes and full lips.

    Reply
  238. mia said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Chris G.:

    Ha hah ha! Thanx – I was about to write a thread about that! You took that right out of my mouth!

    Reply
  239. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @Chris G.:

    Exactly whatever Angelina wants them to say at any given moment? Welcome back BTW Chris G., it’s been a while, where you been all this time? Hanging out with Liz E.?

    Reply
  240. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @mia:

    Ever heard me say other faux couple TomKat aren’t whoring Suri out to the max too? Try thinking before you type. Thanks for confirming that Brange whore their kids out like TomKat do at every available opportunity though. I love it when a plan comes together. Oh and mia, did you really need me to confirm that the “twins” have only been seen 3 times since their birth in comparison to the 3 times a week for the rest of the kids? That is a pretty well-discussed contradiction mia, thanks for pointing it out though. So do you favour the different surrogates or one surrogate and one adoptee theory? Just wondering what a great mind like yours would make of it all.

    Reply
  241. mia said on November 4th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Au contraire – I never heard you say until now that Tomkat ARE whoring out Suri Cruise! But since they aren`t called Jolie and Pitt the probably aren`t worth your time right? Because this isn`t really about a particular issue – like taking advantage of a minor – this is about YOUR dislike for Jolie!

    And concerning your rather underdeloped reading comprehension – I clearly said that Brangelina`s kids are featrued FAR LESS then Suri Cruise. Ah well!

    Reply
  242. Tamara said on November 4th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    Well, well, well, I see I haven’t missed anything at all LOL

    Hi Everyone!!

    Reply
  243. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    Twins of opposite sex are Fraternal Twins, if indeed they are twins. In order to be Identical Twins , they must be same sex. Knox has a distinctly different look than does Shiloh or Viv. Shape of his head, body structure, bulging forehead. I stand by my guess that he is either half-brother, or less to Shiloh and Viv. So, if Knox IS Brad’s child, then Shiloh and Viv are who’s mia?@mia:

    Reply
  244. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    Mia, i believe Lizzie was referring to Brad’s children , not to the ones they fabricated to portray “twins”.@mia:

    Reply
  245. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    OMG Mia! @Au contraire , now i’m waiting to hear The Adams Family music, and see Lurch calling. Sorry, couldn’t help it. Poor Gomez got the hot’s for Morticia when she’d say au contraire. “they’re all together spooky, the Adams Family!” @mia:

    Reply
  246. lizzieb said on November 4th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I just saw the trailer too. She look OK in the close ups of her face- all bones can look quite good when well lit- but running she looks stupid, skinny and weak and unlikely to be able to take the skin off of a rice pudding, let alone fight. Of course it will bomb, unless the JJ-ers get their hands out of their knickers and buy tickets over and over again. Wooden? I got three splinters watching her!

    Reply
  247. Tamara said on November 4th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    Patty Anne, I have something to tell you.

    Reply
  248. Clearview said on November 4th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    Is it just me or is that trailer hilarious? Forget Evelyn Salt. It’s Olive Oyl as a Russian spy!
    http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb267/addictedtoyankovic/New%20album/Oliveoyl.jpg

    Reply
  249. Vittoria said on November 4th, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    e too paty. Johnny Depp is so cute!!!!

    Reply
  250. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    What i wouldn’t give for one day (night) with him Vittoria…..sigh@Vittoria:

    Reply
  251. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    Well if it’s “com’er little girl, i have a chocolate bar in my pocket….” LOL. Okay sis, i’m all ears.@Tamara:

    Reply
  252. Pattyanne said on November 4th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    HaHaHa, you certainly called that one Clearview. I watched it also, and found it hilarious. I know it’s not supposed to be a comedy, but…….@Clearview:

    Reply
  253. Tokyo Rose said on November 4th, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Keane, I’m still waiting to hear what YOU are doing for the children of Somalia, since you can sit in judgment of those who actually ARE doing something….So, what are YOU doing?????

    Reply
  254. Ms Agatha said on November 4th, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    I am in ***** ( and not alone ) …. waiting for my beloved lurkers to get their a^^ ripped apart….. Hi ! Seeya in Federal Detention ….. :)

    Reply
  255. Ms Agatha said on November 4th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Patty… you have me in stiches …..

    Reply
  256. Ms Agatha said on November 4th, 2009 at 9:43 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Yes Patty … he is cute ..I admit …. but he won’t be able to handle me ….:)

    Reply
  257. Ms Agatha said on November 4th, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    …as sexy as an Russian deodorant …. :)

    Reply
  258. Ms Agatha said on November 4th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    @Tamara:
    … don’t you now lurk her into the back of your van and feed her sweets ….LOL

    Reply
  259. keane cyber queen supreme said on November 5th, 2009 at 5:46 am

    @ Mia – then frankly dear you need to start paying a bit more attention don’t you now? The Cruises disgust me about half as much as Brange do because they whore out their kid, but at least they don’t adopt vulnerable orphans and whore them out too and pose with every refugee they can get within half a mile of to get good press. Even Tom Cruise wouldn’t stoop that low. Oh and yes mia you are absolutely correct, everything I say is in fact motivated by my dislike of Jolie, nothing at all to do with my disgust at her behaviour. Do you want to tell me I’m a jellis h8r now? Only problem is I’ve never been jealous of anyone in my life and even if I had, Jolie doesn’t have anything to be jealous of anyway, she’s a miserable wreck! Oh and thanks for pointing out my “under dedeloped” reading skills. That was hilarious!

    Reply
  260. Tamara said on November 5th, 2009 at 6:55 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    haha Too funny Keane my girl, but no worri es, we have closed that blog down and opened a brand new one that CANNOT be hacked into, or found either as there is absolutely no way to link any of us to it! We are smarter then the average Bear and one step ahead, so collect your invite and join us all there. Phew! Free at last….LOL

    Reply
  261. biggie said on November 5th, 2009 at 8:47 am

    You simply don’t know US law and how things are done here. A true story is very easy to confirm, by the way. They just need to be pointed in the right direction. They pay as well if it is your wish to collect, (which it wasn’t in my case) when it is confirmed. You really should keep within what you know.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  262. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 5th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @biggie:

    Rubbish. Nothing is true in a court of law unless it can be proven by evidence. Believe me I am involved in several situations that could be easily resolved in my favour if I could just say “but it’s the truth” my lord! The concept of “truth” is totally subjective unless it can be proved with evidence. If you have it then great, if you don’t then you’re screwed. And yes thanks I do know they pay, I am more than aware of that having been on both sides of the equation for quite a few years now. Perhaps you should stick within what you know too my friend, journalism and the law clearly not being two of them.

    Reply
  263. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 5th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    @Clearview:

    No it’s not you, it’s completely hilarious. That’s one turkey that’s big enough for Thanksgiving and Christmas and I suspect the Producers know it too! I figure that’s why they’ve leaked this trailer to test reaction to it before they decide how much more money to throw away on marketing. My advice: $0.50.

    Reply
  264. Tamara said on November 5th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Maybe it will go straight to DVD – boy wouldnt that be a great big kick in the azz – if that happened her career would be OVAH

    Reply
  265. lizzieb said on November 5th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Oh don’t be mean.I reckon it’s worth a quid or two. Dear god, imagine being at drama school, workng hard etc and seeing a drug addled scarecrow get role after role.I remember reading that great book by William Goldman, ‘Adventures in the Screen Trade’ where he says the immortal words ‘nobody knows anything’ My feeling is that the money people behind these films keep hoping that the enormous publicity she attracts will translate into bums on seats. But it never does.. oh dear, how sad.

    Reply
  266. biggie said on November 5th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    You check it out first, then pay. What’s your problem, why so defensive? When did you work state side, you do not seem to have a grasp on the legalities here? By the way, how many times have you read stories in the rags that have not been true? Never? Actually, quite frequently, daily perhaps Including the newspapers NY Times and Washington Post. They post a small retraction on the bottom of the page. @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  267. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 5th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @biggie:

    I’m sorry biggie but what on earth are you talking about? “You check it out first, then pay” – check what out and then pay what? And what you’re saying about the difference between the law in the UK and the US is utterly baffling. Are you saying that in the US someone can just call up a paper and say “this is the truth because I say it is” and the journo goes “great” and their lawyer goes “fine, go ahead and publish!” – is that what you’re telling me?!!! So in the US anyone can just ring up any publication and get any story printed because they say it is the truth? Biggie I’m sure you don’t need me to tell you that there is no such thing as a solid, constant and concrete entity called “the truth” which can be drawn on by all people simply by looking in it’s direction. There are always as many versions of the truth as people who perceive it, unless we’re talking about something like scientific evidence for example, and even that can be highly debatable. I am telling you now I am working on a story with one of the leading broadsheets in the UK and have been responsible for reseearching stories for several of the UK’s leading broadcasters, I know exactly what I am talking about. I know exactly what does and doesn’t constitute evidence to print/broadcast, and it most certainly is not “it is the truth guv’nor”! If it was that easy I wouldn’t have had to have worked 70 hours a week and stayed in the office all night to make sure the show could be broadcast! Come on biggie, no-one is as stupid as this!

    Reply
  268. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 5th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Ah, so that’s why you were too busy to talk to me then! You’re desperately trying to figure out how to spin yourselves out of the embarrassment that is not just the co-star immediately pulling out of the film AJ has just signed on to, but the DIRECTOR too?! No wonder you haven’t got the time to advise me on the finer points of US libel law!!! Wow, guess Sam what’s-his-face was a bit pissed about that piece of PR you dropped suggesting AJ and him might have more than just a bit of on screen chemistry hey? And as for the Director, well, you were only just saying on the other thread how great he was. Too great to work with a washed-up old has-been like AJ then! How funny!

    Reply
  269. biggie said on November 5th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    Yes, I am telling you that you give them information, they vet it and you (doesn’t take so long), and then it is their choice to print it. If they print, they pay. They use three sources. And I am surprised you think there is no true story. Someone is dead, someone is alive, one would be true, one is right, one is wrong. Sorry you are having such difficulties with your project. Pehaps you need help from someone use to vetting facts. Done daily by every paper, magazine, and news organization.

    Reply
  270. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on November 5th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @biggie:

    Nah biggie, that’s not how it works AT ALL! Three sources and it’s ok to print? What if all those three sources were lying? I can find a thousand people who will tell me the same lie but that doesn’t mean I can broadcast it! If you’re tellng a story about someone which is potentially defamatory you either need to get them to admit to it or have factual evidence such as a criminal conviction against them, otherwise it cannot be broadcast. Otherwise everyone with a grudge against someone or who was whacko could say anything about anyone, couldn’t they? You are unbelievably misinformed. And I’m not having difficulties with “my project” at all. It in fact isn’t a “project”, it is a story I am leaking to the press about political corruption. And for that, as with most things, you can’t just say “it’s the truth cos I say it is, ask biggie”. I have to back everything I say up with the official documents, and even that may not make it past the paper’s lawyers. Not sure which publication you leaked your story to biggie, but it sure as hell wasn’t anything like mine (and yes they know plenty about exposing political corruption, I am working with the journo who was responsible for uncovering the biggest scandal in UK politics in the last couple of decades), or any other publication in the UK for that matter. And no, we don’t need help with “fact-checking”, thanks (wouldn’t it be an easy game if that’s all it came down to!), we need leaked documents. Thanks so much for the advice though, I’ll be sure to come to you next time I’m doing a big undercover story! Best of luck to you biggie!

    Reply
  271. DebFrmHell said on November 5th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @Kate!
    Do you think that the book is going to touch on any of the things involving the procurement of one of the “twins”? Just curious.

    Reply
  272. Kate said on November 6th, 2009 at 2:39 am

    @DebFrmHell:
    Hi Deb, what twins ? lol they are not twins. You mean the one that she had and the one they …..?

    Of course . Absolutely.

    Reply
  273. Astro said on November 6th, 2009 at 8:31 am

    ZZZZZZZZZzzzzZZZZZZZZzzzzZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZZZ

    ZZZZZZZZZzzzzZZZZZZZZzzzzZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZZZ

    ZZZZZZZZZzzzzZZZZZZZZzzzzZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZZZ

    Reply
  274. d said on November 6th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    And in other breaking news……KFED’s super sperm strikes again……..his GF is preggo

    Reply
  275. Togi said on November 6th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    @Astro:
    Wake up, Astro! LOL. At least you’re still here, which is a GOOD thing!

    Reply
  276. Togi said on November 6th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    @d:
    I guess Britt is going to have to up the monthly payments, aye?

    Reply
  277. Ms Agatha said on November 6th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @Astro:

    Only 3 more weeks Snow White and you will wake up to the book of your man Ian ! :) hahaha

    Reply
  278. Ms Agatha said on November 6th, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    I would love to invite you all to a film party of Salt every Sunday morning… in the style of the Rocky Horror Picture SHow…. in costumes…. with bleeding knees… blond/or ashen black wigs… hollow eye sockets…who comes with the most adopted kids in camouflage wins 5 min posting on IUC lol

    Reply
  279. benjaminbutton14 said on November 7th, 2009 at 12:59 am

    bb14. This is off the track but Britney Spears performed at a concert in Perth (a state of Australia) last nite and got booed off the stage for lip synching. Fans and more fans walked out on her show demanding their money back. Apparently she snubbed fans at out Sydney airport when she arrived and left them high and dry, I’m afraid she’s not a welcome sight here, be fun to see how the rest of her tour goes tho, she might leave the Country owing us.

    Reply
  280. Laila said on November 8th, 2009 at 4:22 am

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Perth is not a state. It is a city, you idiot

    Reply
  281. Astro said on November 10th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    So What?….I can describe to you the movie when the book comes out. We will have some noise, everybody will talk about that, after two or three weeks, nobody will remember the book, Brangelina will say nothing about the book and they will remain together for a long time. That’s it!. No sorprise!!!…Sorry!

    Reply
  282. RealityCheck said on November 16th, 2009 at 6:19 am

    @Pattyanne:
    If they ever split up, I’ll be the one on Team Brad! I was on Team Jen during the divorce and Brad’s behaviour disgusted me, but no person in his right mind can be on Team Jolie! Just look at who he was before he met her and you will see Jolie has ruined his whole life! Six kids with a woman whose past is so strange that the world will never forget it, no matter what she does. He gave her much more than she ever gave him – he gave her his fame but she gave him her notoriety! He couldn’t clean her image up – she smeared his! He will always remain “the man who fell for that Jolie bimbo regardless of her past”. I don’t think anyone deserves to be tied to Jolie for ever – that’s too much for anyone!

    Reply
  283. [...] magazine and their 40th anniversary, penthouse pet taylor vixen visited the howard stern show. IUC Exclusive: It's Raining Jolie Books You may determine more goss on the tattooed vixen just by sticking to the awful truth. And [...]

  284. [...] IUC Exclusive: It's Raining Jolie Books hopfeed_template=""; hopfeed_align='LEFT'; hopfeed_type='IFRAME'; hopfeed_affiliate_tid='WICKED'; hopfeed_affiliate='mercator'; hopfeed_fill_slots='true'; hopfeed_height=100; hopfeed_width=550; hopfeed_cellpadding=5; hopfeed_rows=1; hopfeed_cols=2; hopfeed_font='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans Serif'; hopfeed_font_size='9pt'; hopfeed_font_color='black'; hopfeed_border_color='transparent'; hopfeed_link_font_color='#9d080d'; hopfeed_link_font_hover_color='#3300FF'; hopfeed_background_color='transparent'; hopfeed_keywords=''; hopfeed_path='http://mercator.hopfeed.com'; hopfeed_link_target='_blank'; [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

October 2009
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Meta