IUC Exclusive: Its The Final Countdown – 37 Days To Go

Posted on October 24th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

brangelina_large_en

132 Comments
Tags: Brangie

Gitano said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:39 am

So you’ve settled on that title and that cover?
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:47 am

@Gitano:
LOL You beat me to the punch! That was exactly what I was going to say
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:48 am

…and then I was going to say: YAY!!! Whooooo Hooooooo Can’t wait. Ian says its going to be a shocker, so Im keeping my fingers crossed that he’s right
Reply
Big Applette said on October 24th, 2009 at 9:37 am

i already pre-ordered and am looking forward to reading ever (hopefully) juicy word. If His Highness is listening, is there any truth to the speculation that SRRC’s quote, “I’ve got your back and your back end” means that this will be a kiss up book to Brangie? That was not my take on it but inquiring minds need to know.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 10:06 am

Yeaaaaaaa~! I also pre-ordered Brangelina from Amazon.com, and i’m anxiously awaitng a Real Blockbuster from Ian on The Brand. So much speculation, and so much “insider” information out there that we need to know the “down dirty truth”. I for one, knowing Angie’s history, am not expecting a WhiteWash of her, but some truth and facts to confirm many of our theories worked on here. Brad is a user, a lame azzed user who used Angie’s reputation of wild woman/sexual object to further his image. Remember how he always morphs into the male opposite of whichever female he is partnering at the time? Guess he got tired of playing good guy and went for the bad. Hope he gets his azz burned good! And, will i discover if he is Bi? Gay? or Hetro and Misunderstood? LOL. And dear IAN, i hope your book doesn’t have “dirt” on Jennifer Aniston in it….remember this book is titled Brangelina…Not Branaston. I feel a lot of people would be turned off by derogatory comments about her in this book. Enough of her being pulled into the Bermuda Triangle. Thirty-seven days huh? Hope Amazon sends it out quickly!
Reply
Big Applette said on October 24th, 2009 at 10:14 am

@Pattyanne:
Right on, Pattyanne. Funny how you mention that Pitt morphs into his female partners. I think Jolie also morphs into the characters she plays. In Gia she played a drug-addict model. Afther that she admitted to using heroine and other drugs. In Girl Interrputed, she played a mental patient. After that role, she checked herself into a mental hospital. She played a pilot in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow and after that she began flying and got her pilot’s license. In Crossing Borders, she played a U.N. aid worker. After that, she became a U.N. G.W. Ambassador. In Mr. and Mrs. Smith, she played Pitt’s wife. Now she is his partner. In many of her action roles she uses guns and knives. She since reported that she collects knives and would use a gun to defend her family. God help Pitt now that she will be playing the Gucci murderess.

I am surprised no media outlet has reported on both of their morphing tendancies. The Brand’s behavior in that regard is downright strange if you ask me.
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 10:40 am

And another famous couple that Ian feeds on – both financially and in increasing his notority! I wonder when he will finally start to do something original like writing a book with characters that HE came up with! But wait: he pretty much already did that by sticking his sick fantasies on Brangelina and appealing to his butt kissing followers of whom the most loyal are Kate and Keane. Let`s see if Keane gets wet when Ian repaets her theory about dead children in confins, writes about bestiality, drug dealing, an affair with the president and a mysterious child with a vanished model. If it comes to a lawsuit he will probably loose more than this book could earn him. Considering the 98% neagative reviews on amazon of his Micheal Jackson book few people enjoy the sordid tales of this self declaired undercover “journalist”!
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 10:49 am

@guest1:

Wow Mia, even for you that was disgusting. You have surpassed yourself.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:00 am

How right you are! I had overlooked Jolie’s taking on the personna of the character she portrays on screen, but you nailed it there. These people are to be pittied, they have no reality in their lives, maybe that is why they live such insane, screwed up existances when out of the camera’s range? This Toxic Duo have been a disaster from day one.@Big Applette:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:02 am

Mia, you been watching Porn On Demand again girl? Now wash that mouth out with soap before you post again please, i prefer not to have my vision challanged with such bullchyt. As for azz kissing, If Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt would bend over and bare it to you, you know you’d kiss it and thank them for the privledge!!@guest1:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:07 am

I think Brad Pitt has a Sexual Identity problem. He can’t adopt a personna that is entirely his, but changes like a cameleon to reflect his female partner. I’d like to see some photos of Brad in which he hangs out with a guy for a period of time to see if he morphs then as well. I feel that alone would answer the question of, “Is Brad Pitt Bi? Gay? of Hetrosexual?”
Reply
Big Applette said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:14 am

@Pattyanne:

i don’t believe for one second that Brad is not bi. I think that was the appeal with Jolie…anything goes. There has been too much talk around Hollywood for too many years that Pitt has had boyfriends on the side. Not that it matters but it certainly isn’t the ideal situation for certain women who want a conventional husband.
Reply
Big Applette said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:16 am

@guest1:
Don’t worry about there ever being a lawsuit. The Brand would never want to undergo the scrutiny that a deposition involves. Just my opinion. As a p.s., people who write about other people are called “biographers.” Not everyone writes non-fiction. Get it?
Reply
lizzieb said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:17 am

I’m going to read it. As for those disgusting comments about Keane I am always amazed that people cannot go on a website for a good gossip without attacking people personally. It’s like bloody Just Jared, with everyone calling anyone who does not buy ‘the best couple in the world and if you don’t like them u is jelly h8ters’ by the vilest personal insults. I’ve been called morbidly obese, barren whore myself. Odd given I’m a UK size 12 (think that’s US 10) and I’m 5′ 10” and it was a rotten shock to my kids that I was barren. As for the whore- I wish, might have made a few quid. Let’s try and play nice eh? I cannot stand Ange and the himbo but if you do , carry on.
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:23 am

@lizzieb:

Don’t worry lizzieb Mia/guest1 is pretty low to non-functioning in the brain departmennt. You can’t expect much of it. She is homophbic, abusive and offensive most of the time (I think her lowest point was some vile comment about Kate’s deceased child) yet consistently claims moral superiority to Ian and all others posting here. It is not worth wasting a second of your existence thinking about!
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:34 am

Well said lizzieb. I think we can all agree to opposing opinions being voiced without resorting to Middle School Name Calling because we disagree. It’s totally unnecessary and irrelevant to the topic. I enjoy reading different takes on a scenario, but i refuse to be insulted, it’s my choice to make, rather i consider the poster’s life situation and judge them by their wordage. People such as Guest1 are those that I would not associate with in my real, daily life, so how much value can I place upon their opinions here? Nada. @lizzieb:
Reply
lizzieb said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:41 am

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Fair enough.I just hate bullies. It’s prefectly easy to have a fun rant about the cult of slebs without all that carry on.I have grave worries about the loons when the split comes- it will be like the rock their church was built on has fallen down.Me, I ‘ll laugh, except for those poor kids.
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:45 am

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

I have just mentioned some of the claims that Ian and yes YOU came up with. And yes they are disgusting no doubt about that!
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:54 am

You know, everyone says those poor kids, but me, well, I think they will be better off after the split. And yes, Guest 1-7/Mia – I DO believe they will split and soon. Patty Anne is right on with BP’s M.O. he does morph into his female counterparts, so if he happens to start dating someone sunny and fun, who wears something besides black once in awhile and actually wears a bikini to the beach, who has lots of friends and family, who loves children, who laughs and has fun, then the kids will be waaaaaaaaay better off. Their mother is the darkness, and Brad could be the light, if he finds the right woman, because he doesn’t seem capable of standing on his own. I hope his midwestern upbringing will kick into play and he will remember that they need their own friends, they need to go to school and they need some consistency in their lives, something the Drac Queen doesn’t seem capable of providing for them. So, I think, yes, please DO split and soon, then maybe, just maybe those kids will have a chance for happiness. And no Mia, they are not happy now, they are miserable little children based on every picture Ive ever seen of them.
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:57 am

@Pattyanne:

Actually no – as I mentioned above I have just repeated some of the old claims and some of YOUR sodid theories. Seems like you don`t want to be reminded of them. Didn`t one of you just wrote not so long ago how much she enjoys taking part in Ian`s sick little riddles and coming up with the most sordid theories imagineable? Didn`t she wrote that that was her favourite spare time activity – coming up with claims of deas kids and accusing strangers (Brangelina) of things that her own sick little mind came up with?

And Keane no I have absolutely NO problem with you be a lesbian. So stop accusing me of things that have no basis whatsoever.
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

@Pattyanne:

Actually no – as I mentioned above I have just repeated some of the old claims and some of YOUR sodid theories. Seems like you don`t want to be reminded of them. Didn`t one of you just wrote not so long ago how much she enjoys taking part in Ian`s sick little riddles and coming up with the most sordid theories imagineable? Didn`t she wrote that that was her favourite spare time activity – coming up with claims of dead kids and accusing strangers (Brangelina) of things that her own sick little mind came up with?

And Keane no I have absolutely NO problem with you being a lesbian. So stop accusing me of things that have no basis whatsoever.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

Guest1/Mia, you’re stuttering hun. Calm down and take your time. I’m not paying attention to you anyway… @guest1:
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

@guest1:
1-7 I find it curious that you spend so much time on this site desperately baiting the regulars with your opposing point of view, which we all know and agree that you are entitled to. But, you have tried and tried to turn the tide in your direction to no avail, so why do you keep coming back, what is it exactly that you want? Do you want us all to say Yes Mia, you are absolutely right! We do see the errors of our ways, how can you ever forgive us. Is that what you want? Because you already know that is not ever going to happen, so why do you keep at it? In your mind, what is the point? Seriously, I am asking you a direct question…what is your point, what are you hoping to accomplish? I ask because I wonder if it’s constructive for you or is it for the thrill of the argument? Personally, I would never go to a site where I hate everyone on it and what they stand for just so I could force upon them my point of view, I would just find that an exercise in futility so I can’t help but wonder what motivates you to do it?
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

@Pattyanne:

Suuure that is why you replied because you don`t pay attention. That an intersesting way to show that you don`t care.
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

@Tamara:

According to your own argumentation – why exaxtly do you bother with Brangelina if you can`t stand them? Why waste time on someone you despise? If you can answer my question then I will try to answer yours!
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:22 pm

True Tamara. Most likely a split will enhance the lives of the Toxic Duo as well as the six children brought into this mess. With Angie’s work schedule becoming hectic rather quickly, she will have even less time to spend around the children, and the nannies (mommy and daddy nanny i read they are called by the kids) will raise them with love and a strong moral understanding. Brad hopefully will realize what a total fool he’s made of himself, and what an embarrassment to his family, and change his life around. I even believe that Angie will benefit from a parting with Brad Pitt as they seem to bring out the worst in one another. Here’s hoping!@Tamara:
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

@guest1:
Mia – you deliberately misunderstood my question entirely. So I will draw my own conclusions, you are here merely to cause friction. I don’t think you even care what the argument is about. If we were pro something you would be against it just so you could bait Keane, or any of the regulars here. Your purpose is not to defend the Brange at all IMO it is merely a guise to argue with the regulars. Anyway, that concludes my conversation with you, I was just curious.
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

@Tamara:

Well seems like YOU deliberately misunderstand ME! I am here to state MY opinion and to bring a little bit of srnse and reason into a mob that loves sordid unproven tales that have no basis whatsoever. Clear enough?
In other words – I state what I believe in – and I definetely don`t believe in coming up with sordid theories just to blame them on strangers nor do I believe Ian`s unproven claims or your readiness to involve Brangelina`s innocent kids into your disgusting riddle sovling activities!
Reply
mooki said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/304-celebrity-news/paul-haggis-has-left-cos-55095/

Director Paul Haggis has left the Co$. Here’s his letter to Tommy Davis:
“Tommy,

As you know, for ten months now I have been writing to ask
you to make a public statement denouncing the actions of the
Church of Scientology of San Diego. Their public sponsorship of
Proposition 8, a hate-filled legislation that succeeded in taking
away the civil rights of gay and lesbian citizens of California –
rights that were granted them by the Supreme Court of our
state – shames us.

I called and wrote and implored you, as the official spokesman
of the church, to condemn their actions. I told you I could not,
in good conscience, be a member of an organization where
gay-bashing was tolerated.

In that first conversation, back at the end of October of last
year, you told me you were horrified, that you would get to
the bottom of it and “heads would roll.” You promised action.
Ten months passed. No action was forthcoming. The best you
offered was a weak and carefully worded press release, which
praised the church’s human rights record and took no
responsibility. Even that, you decided not to publish.

The church’s refusal to denounce the actions of these bigots,
hypocrites and homophobes is cowardly. I can think of no
other word. Silence is consent, Tommy. I refuse to consent.

I joined the Church of Scientology thirty-five years ago. During
my twenties and early thirties I studied and received a great
deal of counseling. While I have not been an active member
for many years, I found much of what I learned to be very
helpful, and I still apply it in my daily life. I have never
pretended to be the best Scientologist, but I openly and
vigorously defended the church whenever it was criticized,
as I railed against the kind of intolerance that I believed was
directed against it. I had my disagreements, but I dealt with
them internally. I saw the organization – with all its warts,
growing pains and problems – as an underdog. And I have
always had a thing for underdogs.

But I reached a point several weeks ago where I no longer
knew what to think. You had allowed our name to be allied
with the worst elements of the Christian Right. In order to
contain a potential “PR flap” you allowed our sponsorship
of Proposition 8 to stand. Despite all the church’s words
about promoting freedom and human rights, its name is
now in the public record alongside those who promote
bigotry and intolerance, homophobia and fear.

The fact that the Mormon Church drew all the fire, that no
one noticed, doesn’t matter. I noticed. And I felt sick. I
wondered how the church could, in good conscience,
through the action of a few and then the inaction of its
leadership, support a bill that strips a group of its civil
rights.

This was my state of mind when I was online doing research
and chanced upon an interview clip with you on CNN. The
interview lasted maybe ten minutes – it was just you and
the newscaster. And in it I saw you deny the church’s policy
of disconnection. You said straight-out there was no such
policy, that it did not exist.

I was shocked. We all know this policy exists. I didn’t have
to search for verification – I didn’t have to look any further
than my own home.

You might recall that my wife was ordered to disconnect
from her parents because of something absolutely trivial
they supposedly did twenty-five years ago when they
resigned from the church. This is a lovely retired couple,
never said a negative word about Scientology to me or
anyone else I know – hardly raving maniacs or enemies
of the church. In fact it was they who introduced my wife
to Scientology.

Although it caused her terrible personal pain, my wife
broke off all contact with them. I refused to do so. I’ve
never been good at following orders, especially when I
find them morally reprehensible.

For a year and a half, despite her protestations, my wife
did not speak to her parents and they had limited access
to their grandchild. It was a terrible time.

That’s not ancient history, Tommy. It was a year ago.

And you could laugh at the question as if it was a joke?
You could publicly state that it doesn’t exist?

To see you lie so easily, I am afraid I had to ask myself:
what else are you lying about?

The great majority of Scientologists I know are good people
who are genuinely interested in improving conditions on this
planet and helping others. I have to believe that if they knew
what I now know, they too would be horrified. But I know
how easy it was for me to defend our organization and dismiss
our critics, without ever truly looking at what was being said;
I did it for thirty-five years. And so, after writing this letter, I
am fully aware that some of my friends may choose to no
longer associate with me, or in some cases work with me. I
will always take their calls, as I always took yours. However,
I have finally come to the conclusion that I can no longer be a
part of this group. Frankly, I had to look no further than your
refusal to denounce the church’s anti-gay stance, and the
indefensible actions, and inactions, of those who condone this
behavior within the organization. I am only ashamed that I
waited this many months to act. I hereby resign my membership
in the Church of Scientology.

Sincerely,

Paul Haggis

Ps. I’ve attached our email correspondence. At some point it
became evident that you did not value my concerns about the
church’s tacit support of an amendment that violated the civil
rights of so many of our citizens. Perhaps if you had done a
little more research on me, the church’s senior management
wouldn’t have dismissed those concerns quite so cavalierly.
While I am no great believer in resumes and awards, this is
what you would have discovered:

{tl;dr list of accomplishments and awards}”
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

Wow~! Absolutely , unequivocally profound! Great post mooki. Perhaps there is yet hope.@mooki:
Reply
HisHighness said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

Cover and title is just tentative. There will be changes when it comes out. Book definitely comes out in 37 x 24 hours.
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

@guest1:

Mia describing me or any other poster here masturbating over the thought of dead children is repellant however you dress it up. And no it most definitely does not in any way remotely constitute “sense” or “reason” – it’s the polar opposite in fact. As for whether you have a problem with me being a lesbian or not I’m not sure why you brought that up as that certainly was not what I was referring to. I was referring to your repeated use of the word “gay” as an insult to describe someone who is in fact a transvestite -that is very homophobic. (For future reference not all transvestites are gay and not all gay people cross-dress, I’m sure that will go way over your head but never mind). And can I just point out that who I choose to sleep with is and never has been any of your business whatsoever, and I do not wish to hear about whether you happen to be cool with it or not, either now or in the future. In other words, my sex life is absolutely not up for discussion by someone I wouldn’t piss on if they were on fire if I met them in real life. That means you. Got it?
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

Great~! Can’t wait. I’ve pre-ordered it on Amazon.com and am patiently, well, alomst patiently waiting my copy. Wish there was a way to have you sign it though. @HisHighness:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

Bravo, well said my friend. Prejudice of any sort should not be tolerated, however ignorantly denied. How pathetic for someone to come to a blog simply to stir up chyt in order to attempt to inflate their undernourished ego. Sugar works better than vinegar yano, give friendship and respect a try and you might find yourself actually liked by some.
@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

The sugar advice is meant for Mia/Guest1 naturally…wink!!@Pattyanne:
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

@Pattyanne:
Picture me banging my head against a brick wall ~~
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

@HisHighness:
So, do you have a tentative title in mind? I loved Deb’s (and others) Mr and Mrs Myth haha! But I don’t suppose you can use that! What picture are you using on the front? Will it be of them together or separate pics? Or do I have to wait and see?? samcc
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

Although that picture from Cannes shows her in all her pasty bloated glory – not her best night by far
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

So Brad’s just been in a motorcycle accident in L.A.? Why would he be weaving between cars at a red light? Lost control and crashed? Ran into an apartment building and had a friend rush over to pick him up and….left a very expensive custom bike laying there? Do i smell DUI avoidance Bradley?

http://www.tmz.com/
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

LMBO@Tamara:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

Brad and Angie: The Creation and Disintegration The Brand
Reply
Tidbit said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

I hope the book is more factual than his MJ expose which had so many untruths, falsehoods, poorly researched areas etc. that the book lost its validity. Ian is a publicity chaser and will do anything to stay relevant and in the public’s eye.
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

@Tidbit:

Well if that’s true then he shares more than a few characteristics with his subjects doesn’t he? You could substitute the word “Ian” for “Brangelina” and we would have a perfect description of everyone’s favourite power couple. Thanks for your contribution to the cause!
Reply
lizzieb said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

I think for a title ‘High Hos’ takes some beating. Or ‘God Bless The Jolie Pitts- the decline if the Western World’. Or ‘Selling sancity- how buying babies can drastically improve even the worst image’ Or ‘The fifth horsemen- how we know the end is nigh’
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

@Pattyanne:
I wonder if he was drunk, but…it happened at 11:15 California time, bit early dontcha think? Also, I read that he never ever travels alone on his bike. The pap pictures show him riding alone but in reality there are 4 bodyguards riding right behind him and a black SUV in case he wants to ride in the car, so this seems bizarre, running into an apt building and calling an asst to pick him up. Most likely the asst was already there in the SUV behind him, no one could get to the scene that fast in LA traffic
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

@lizzieb:
LOL
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

Ronan Allen. The genius son of Mia Farrow and Woody Allen is the most handsome young man i have ever seen bar none! He is a genius, but also a great humanitarian, a REAL humanitarian mind you, not one posing for photo ops to advance their draw and earnings in film.

http://blogs.babble.com/famecrawler/2009/10/23/woody-allen-and-mia-farrows-son-is-a-friggin-genius/#more-19297

It’s a shame that the Rainbow Tribe will never grow into such young persons of integrity and humanitarinism. Congrats to Mia Farrow for raising her children well.
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

@lizzieb:
The Bradley Bunch haha
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

Maybe he was running and hiding from Angie? Who knows where he might have been coming from…wink, wink!! Said, Story Developing, so i’m going to check back in a few. Just glad he’s not hurt, or hasn’t hurt another. @Tamara:
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

With Eight You Get Eggroll – haha (Doris Day movie)
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:40 pm

@Pattyanne:
Yea, they ought to have some pics coming us soon, saw X17 was there when it happened (convenient?? or luck??)
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

From TMZ:

UPDATE: Several people tell us, but we haven’t confirmed, that a paparazzi hit Pitt from behind, which caused him to hit a car in front him, lose his balance and fall.

TMZ has learned Brad Pitt was involved in a minor motorcycle accident moments ago in Los Angeles.

A witness at the scene tells us Pitt was trying to weave in between cars while at a red light — but he lost control and fell off the bike.

We’re told he got up and moved the motorcycle to the side of the road then ran into an apartment building.

Our witness says he waited for someone to come pick him up and now he’s no longer at the scene. Pitt left his motorcycle behind.

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/##ixzz0UssupdNE
Reply
lizzieb said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

Here’s some good titles- all anagrams of BradAngie

n Aged
Bra Gained
Bar Gained
A Bad Reign

A Barged In

A Beard Gin
A Danger Bi
A Grade Bin

A Rage Bind
A Nag Bride

Bad Anger I
Reply
lizzieb said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

opps posting error- 1st one is Brain Aged!
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

In Angie’s Shoes; The New Story Of An Old Woman Who Lives In Louis Vuitton Shoes.
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

@lizzieb:
LOL Brilliant!!
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

There was another celeb who was recently rear ended by the paps…..i have forgotten who though.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

Lmboooo @ A Nag Bride@lizzieb:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

Or maybe they are the paps who rear ended Brad?@Tamara:
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

@Pattyanne:
Just funny that x17 and TMZ both just happened to be on the scene these things are not coincidental – if they don’t want to be seen they know how to do it, this ride was probably a planned photo op, the accident was not, so the paps got a bonus! LOL
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

Don`t be so touchy Keane! I never cared about your sex life as I stated before! It`s cute how you try to defend Ian`s alter ego Sugar Gay also I think he/she is a far bigger pervert then Jolie could ever be if she lived a million lives.
By the way what`s wrong with my observation that you and your buddies obvioulsy LOOOOVEEE to come up with sick interpretations of Ian`s riddles while trying to surpass even Ian (which is quite a task since he sets the standard pretty low – so trying to get even lower is almost unthinkable). I think I hit the nail on the head and you can`t face the truth!
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

Anybody see this little gem on DListed:

http://www.dlisted.com/node/34505

This is a piece of pure Angie PR poetry in motion folks. See Lady Angelina takes time out of her hectic saving the world and being a piece of hot ass schedule to personally bake her children’s birthday cakes from a packet mix don’t cha no? She is such a humble woman and “hands-on mom” she wouldn’t dream of delegating such a task to a flunkie, no sirree! Do you think she even knows when her kids’ birthdays are? Would love to see someone catch her off guard and ask her. I don’t think she would fare too well!

After reading that Life and Style article it occurred to me that Angelina is a very stupid woman. It is one thing to be a brazen liar, quite another to tell brazen lies that time will inevitably prove false. (Like she is taking a year off from her career and she is a “hands-on” mom for two). It occurred to me that this woman must be a pathological liar. I think to not only be able to tell constant lies about yourself, but to tell lies which can easily be proven false, you have to have a screw loose somewhere. It is like she is so used to lying and so comfortable with it that she doesn’t even consider that it won’t be too long before she is called out on them, irrefutably. Doesn’t she get that her kids will not grow up to lie for her to protect her ass (maybe as she did her own mother)? It is so illogical in my view. Or maybe she just doesn’t think she will live long enough to see that? I genuinely don’t get it.
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

Eh Keane wrong interpretation again! This is a business woman trying to make and or increase profit by mentioning Jolie the same thing that Ian does by the way! I really thought you were smarter then that! Seems like yout hatred for Jolie is blinding you!
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

@guest1:

Sweetheart, is this making you feel proud of yourself? Because it really shouldn’t. Unless you are about 13 perhaps? Which I kind of get the impression is the case (although I wouldn’t want any 13y/o’s to be offended by that association). I dread to think what kind of person lies behind that username, but I think it is obvious it is very young and very, very stupid. And like I said, homophobic insults and discussions about my personal life are definitely not tolerated here. I know you can’t get yourself out of the gutter mia, but try and at least look up at the stars now and again hey? Even the most unfortunate of human beings such as yourself can at least aspire to be something better one day.
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

@guest1:

Sweetheart, if you had half a brain in your little head and were maybe over the age of 10 you would know that no-one can use a name like Angelina Jolie to promote a product without her express permission. It’s called trademark infringement. I think you’ll find celebs sue over it all the time. Otherwise people would be saying Brangelina used their products to promote them all the time wouldn’t they? Mia I know you’re a dumbass but even you know this right? That little clip would have been transmitted with Angelina’s express permission I think you’ll find. It’s all about looking like the hands-on mom and nice, kind, insecure-just-like-the-rest-of-us-chicks desperate PR plan. She’s running out of people to peddle it for her at the moment – James and an “un-named source” seeming to be the only current ones – so she is now paying the cake-mix lady to do it for her. But yes you are right she obviously gets her PR out of it too. It is nonetheless frighteningly desperate. Something I’m sure you won’t have any problem in identifiying with.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

TV cook Sandra Lee is very proud of Angie’s baking attempts, “Sandra told People, “I was really surprised when her friend let me know she made my No Bake birthday cake. She’s a Semi-Homemade mommy just like the rest of us! Wow~! And a No-Bake one at that? How ingenuious of Angie….again.@guest1:
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

Keane Keane really – you should stop insulting people and lecturing others on the very thing YOU do! Too bad that you are obviously not smart enough to see this contradiction!
By the way I am neither a teenager nor half as stupid as you would want me to be! It just looks like I came to close to the truth for your own comfort! While this might explain your agression it certainly doesn`t excuse it!
Reply
guest1 said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

Hm Keane Ian used Jolie`s name too! Or to be more accurate he misused it! I don`t remember him asking her permission – so much for trademark violation! Her given name is hardly a trademark. It`s just an easy way for freaks like Ian to increase his bank account as long as he has such devoted followers as yourself at his feet that should be an easy task.
Reply
benjaminbutton14 said on October 24th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

bb14 Is there anyone on this blog that is an Aussie. I am wondering if there is, and if they are going to buy the book and how are they going about getting it. I have no idea if it will be released here or not, some we get some we dont
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

@HisHighness:
Very exciting IAN, now, timing is everything, so just a suggestion on the cover, if there is a way to time it that you could have it with a big split (like one that a earthquake causes when ones home sits on a fault) on the cover, right down the middle, between them, and release it, the day they announce they are done.

Now that would be magical? Can you imagine, people would truly be wondering, what is going on with this IAN and his timing ? lol
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

@guest1:

That’s funny Mia, I give you that. Someone who started out the thread by making vile sexual suggestions about someone who had not even participated in it yet is hardly in a position to accuse others of insulting others and hypocrisy (I think is the word you were looking for), so I assume you must be a stand-up comedian. Either way I wouldn’t be too hasty to deny your age – whether physical or mental. It is your only real out after all. I would grab it with both hands if I were you. Better than having to admit this is the voice and behaviour of a grown adult hey?

Oh and as for the other one, Ian is writing a biography not using her name to endorse a product you utter egit. Jesus, Mary and Joseph, use google and wiki if nothing else. Even bottom-feeders can type a word and put it into a search engine. Have some pride in yourself Mia!
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

You can purchase the book on http://www.Amazon.com. Click on that, and then in the browser line type Ian Haleprin Brangelina and it will take you directly to the book where you can pre-order it. I already have. @benjaminbutton14:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

I wonder if someone rang a bell, Mia would eat the cheese?@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

@benjaminbutton14:
BB14, can’t you order it on Amazon or B&N ..?
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

@Kate:

You are too clever our Kate, guess that’s what that old post was about then! Wonder if the beginning of the end is gonna start with Brad’s reckless/traumatic/however they’re going to spin it motorcycle accident? Will this cause a deep-seated and irrevocable split in their already-dead-for-a-year relationship? I’m sure this “accident” is no accident….!
Reply
cuze said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

I’m very excited about the book, Ian. Can’t wait.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

Me too cuze. I’m anxious to find out all the answers to the clues we’ve been working on here for months. @cuze:
Reply
cuze said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

@Pattyanne:
Yep, it will all make sense once we get the book. It will be neat to see how close we were.
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Of course the accident was no accident, the spin has started, do you remember Julia Roberts crying wolf, she got caught!! lol and then she slithered back into a dark hole. Did not help her career did it? The paps, the paps are coming. hehehe..I do hope Brad is smarter than that.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/24/brad-pitt-in-minor-motorcycle-accident/

Posted Oct 24th 2009 2:49PM by TMZ Staff

UPDATE 1:37 PM PT: We just spoke to someone who has seen video of the incident — and we’re told absolutely no one else was involved in the accident.

We’re told Brad tried to maneuver his bike between a parked car and a car stopped at a red light, and his handlebars clipped the parked car.

We’re told he lost control and fell over — and everything is fine.

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/24/brad-pitt-in-minor-motorcycle-accident/#ixzz0UtPyxP4G
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

That’s as bad as when Brad nearly ruined one of his expensive custom bikes by putting gas in the oil tank by mistake….the man needs a set of training wheels or a trike to ride around .@Pattyanne:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

Yes , it will~! I must say i’ve had tons of fun working on these puzzles though. Unique way to present information on a Blog as well as be interactive entertainment. Thanks SR, and thank you IAN, and MsNinecents also.@cuze:
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

@Kate:

So what do we think the point of it is? Is it some sort of preliminary incident which will begin a chain of events which will be used as explanation for the eventual split? It will lead to some sort of argument in which Brad will be made to look slightly bad in some way (but no way serious enough to end his career or anything, they are both trying to come out of this career intact after all) and she will look like the victim like the fabricated nanny incident? That’s my thinking.
Reply
Tamara said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

@Kate:
That Julia Roberts thing was horrendous!! RE Brad I still think the accident might have really occurred and the paps got more then they bargained for when they thought they were there to watch BP be super cool all alone out for a ride on his latest toy (just delivered the day before!) But then, it probably was part of the deal IDK
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

@Tamara:
Yes, it may have, I have no idea, poor Brad, sometimes I do feel sorry him, he got more than he bargained for years ago when he met her. I think he has paid his dues, time to let him go and get on with living, but I also would not be shocked if he manipulated it so that is “happened” , Julia did the same.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

I’ve looked at photos of this newest toy of Brads, and with the low and narrow handlebars, i don’t understand how he could have clipped a parked car and lost his balance. Makes no sense to me at all. Especially in such an experienced rider as Brad. First rule of biking is to have control over it at all times, which makes this “accident” sound to me as a child’s version of what made him spill the milk. Wasn’t my fault yano. Sure Brad….maryjane? hash? Bud Light?
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
I don’t know, it is harder to be media savvy with six young lives in the mix, and by his own admission, he did not handle it so well the last time.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

Since Angie has signed on for two more films and has been so busy lately with other films, I believe the excuse for the break up will be that they have grown apart due to their busy schedules, they care for one another, love their children, but in HW it’s hard to maintain a working relationship when both partners are so in demand….bla, bla, bla. I can feel the spin now.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

I’d like to know about the parked auto that Brad is supposed to have “caught his handlebar on” and if anyone left insurance information before they hauled Brad and bike off?
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

Also, you can lay your bike down, pick it up, restart it and ride off…..why didn’t Brad do that?
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 6:27 pm

@Pattyanne:

Curious how the paps were there to record every second of it:

http://www.dlisted.com/node/34512#comments

It was clearly totally pre-planned. And whatever the “accident” was it seems to have been a complete non-event. Maybe just a regular photo opp which went slightly awry due to Brad’s inability to handle the bike? Either way, a bit of a non-story I would say!
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

@Pattyanne:
Well he could have just been unnerved if a pap was followed too close and lost control, anything could have happened really, or he could have faked it to help support new laws about the paps, who knows. I can truly understand Brads hating them, they do get right in his face, and you can see he is uncomfortable, and while he may welcome them when he is dressed to the nines, he and none of us want to be caught at our worse, right? Angelina, otoh seems to thrive on having the camera in her face, big grim, waving like she was just crowing Miss World. Brad had always been uncomfortable with the press, the paps, the media, from day one. He has hated that part of it because he can’t control that part of it, and he is hunted all the time. I honestly don’t know how he stands it, to walk through a airport and have a camera 2 feet from your face going through security.

Now the flip side, he has allowed the children to be in W , and People in professional photographs, and his own, and that sends a message to the paps, one that he can not take back, and one that his children may not be happy about , judging from the deadpan looks, among other signs. I was watching something the other evening,that showcased this young conductor, and Tom Hanks and his wife were in the audience, and I wondered what their children were like. PA mentioned Mia Farrows son, the one she had with Woody, who has nothing to do with his father, Yale educated, a testament to his mother. Totally different type of lifestyle. Remarkable young man, and someone that I would imagine Angelina would like her children to look up too. Mia , though did not see herself as the most beautiful woman in the world, because she wasn’t. Neither was AJ before all the plastic surgery. It really is too bad that Angelina can not find peace within her heart and do what she says she really believes in, and it is equally too bad that Brad looks so strained and unhappy, worn out, and stressed, like a man about to come unglued. You do wonder what is it catching up with him besides karma and six kids. I agree with Tam, I do hope he gets back to where he was.
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

@Pattyanne:

I know but like Kate says it’s going to be bloody hard to spin it so that they both come out of it looking ok when they have accumulated six young children in less years. They – especially Angelina – are already being criticised for their less than adequate parenting. There’s no way they can both come out of it ok. One has to play the victim and the other the perpetrator or they will both sink. The same thing is happening with Britain’s answer to Brangelina, Katie and Peter right now. He has come out of it looking like a saint and his career is soaring. She was always the main attraction and she has virtually destroyed her career in a matter of months. One of Brangelina has to be the fall guy or they both will lose everything I think, they have been way too irresponsible and they were skating on thin ice with the whole Jen thing anyway. The split will be disastrous for their images without a doubt, and they know that, which is why they are clinging together despite looking like they can’t even stand to touch each other. She is more desperate than him because she knows she already has the homewrecker thing chalked up against her and because he is thought to be nice while she isn’t. He looks ambivalent about the whole thing in their photo opps together. She on the other hand is holding on for dear life. I don’t think she can accept that you can’t get out of everything, do enough bad things and they will always catch up with you. I think she is probably in denial about this or is blotting it all out with as many mind-altering substances as she can get her hands on these days. JMO!
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

@Kate:

I think Ange thrived on the attention she got from being with Brad at first, that was the reason she got with him after all! But now I think it is all for damage control and I think she is as uncomfortable as he is. She looks inredibly strained and more false than she ever did in all her photo opps nowadays. It’s because she is now being called out on all the lies she has told. I think the knowledge that she has been rumbled is now making it impossible for her to fake it as convincingly as she used to.
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

Well that is true, they do not fake it as well as they use too. lol the resident insider is back at FF, and saying, mark their word, that no matter what anyone else says, that Brad and Jen are back together, that he does not want her to be seen as the other woman, so he is being careful about this breakup split announcement, and that is why he is playing the dutiful co parent role with Angie , to soften the blow.

Now I would really love it if SR or IAN would please tell us if there is any truth to any of this. I doubt the book is hinging on Brad and Jen getting back together or Brange spltting because they could easily not split just to piss IAN off if they thought he was releasing his book on a date for that reason, so I highly doubt that is coordinated, however, one of the Miss Nines did seem to indicate something about them ..

They have more insiders over there than the National Enquirer does. Not saying they are not valid, but just saying, none have panned out yet-

where is that baby girl anyway from the surrogate, the one about the pink rope? So Brad should have a new baby boy from Miss Sudanese and a new baby girl from whoever he hired to have her…right
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

Any decent biker would die of embarrassment at this story. Has to be publicity set up.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:01 pm

I would also like to see the “old” Brad reappear, but it seems there is more going on with Brad than just breaking up with Angie. He’s never looked as harassed, insecure, unkept, and “lost” as he has this past six months. I would expect someone waiting for the judge to present a sentence of either aquittal or death to look as he has lately. Brad is definately carrying a very heavy load. @Kate:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

Good Grief! I had forgotten the two new babies, that makes Brad….OctoDad.@Kate:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

True, i remember a televised interview with Angie awhile back in which the interviewer asked her what did she want most from life, and she replied, “To hold on to all i now have”. Strange answer i thought at the time, considering the children, her relationship with Brad, etc. I supposed it boiled down to Angie saying, “I want it all, and i intend to keep it all”. Brad is indeed having a difficult time getting away.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

@Pattyanne:
So is IAN saying 37 days x 24 hours til the book is released or til something else.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

Thirty-seven days puts us to December 1st. Amazon says the book comes out December 25th. So i’m now thinking IAN knows something about to become public in 37days…before his book comes out three weeks afterward. Brad’s birthday is December 18th, so perhaps he is going to have a big blow out celebration then….@Kate:
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

Never mind, I see that on B&N the release date is Dec 1st.
Reply
Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

@Kate:

Yeah bless them over at FF, they hold on to their faith in their supposed “insiders” like a crackpot conspiracy theorist holds on to the idea that 9/11 was an inside job. It is ironic and hilarious that they think they told readers here that “santa claus wasn’t real” by pointing out that the SR posts are quotes from other texts (uh, no shit!) and yet they hold on to the words of their nameless, faceless, detail-less insiders like it is gospel. They don’t seem to quite understand the difference between someone who is publishing a book in their own name and an annonymous – and probably untraceable – poster on some obscure little blog like FF. (As if all these super-connected people would find their way there!). I don’t think anyone understands that sites like FF and IUC really are small fry in the contex of the wider media industry and public. People have simply never heard of these places or the stories discussed here. They’d be surprised I think to know how naive a lot of people in the media actually are. They don’t realise that they are in fact far more on to what is going on with the Brange than most news outlets and magazines are, which is why they are attracting the fake insiders. I don’t mean to spoil their fun but I’m just trying to point out the way things are. Industry people do not know or care about these sites on the whole and they most certainly wouldn’t start spilling all their inside info on them. The only industry people these sites attract are the ones who are being discussed – for pretty obvious reasons!
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

Okay, then Amazon must be later than B & N. Drats! that’s three more weeks of waiting for me.@Kate:
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

@Pattyanne:
Amazon must not have updated their site yet.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

Hope so Kate. Either way, i will wait for the book. It’s a must read for me. Another one i would love to read an expose’ on would be the Gosselins, Jon and Kate. The middle class Brad and Angie….lol@Kate:
Reply
mooki said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

@Pattyanne:

oops I meant WRITER Paul Haggis.
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

thanks mooki. The more i read about COS, the more frightened i am to think this can happen in our country. So many intelligent people being hoodwinked into buying into this “church” and following L.R.Hubbard’s doctrine made up of science fiction fantacy. Scarey.@mooki:
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:26 pm

So many people claim they just don’t want to get involved when they witness a crime. That intimidation creates a climate for those with evil intent to get away with violent crimes repeatedly. I’m happy to read about this man standing up to COS and trying to wake up the public to a real threat.
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
For your reading pleasure-The FF Insider-

I think Paid to Hush does know them but she doesn’t know the bigger picture. She has a pretty good grasp of what they’re really like, but as for what’s going on behind the scenes, she does not know.

She said before that there is no way that Jen and Brad are getting back together and I can tell you without a doubt that that statement is inaccurate. It’s well known around here that they are getting back together and have been in contact for months now and that the NY meeting was one of the times they’ve met up recently.

All of these poor Jen pathetic loser in love stories have been created by Ang and her camp because she knows they’re getting back together and has tried to paint Jen in the worst possible light to cushion the blow she’ll get from the public and the media when it happens. She’s trying to make it look like it’s a pity thing because she’s fighting for her image and she knows it. That’s why Brad has been playing nice, traveling with her, being the adult in the situation…it’s because he wants to limit the backlash that she’ll recieve when it happens. And all the stories about Jen getting back with Mayer (or May Hem as some call him)? Not true. She’s biding her time until the time is right with go public with Brad.

Don’t shoot the messenger, I’m just typing what I know. And almost what everyone in HW knows. They are getting back together.

You don’t need to believe it right now. What your beliefs are have little to do with the reality of the situation.

You’ll believe it soon. By the end of the year. As soon as they can complete the transition without having Jen being labeled the other woman, and Jolie being the victim of karma. It has to be ‘respectful’ (Brad’s words, not mine).

The children aren’t keeping them together because they have already ceased being a couple in the romantic sense. They co-parent together, lead separate lives and will soon be announcing that fact.

Mark my words.
Reply
Kate said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

I also see that Daryl D that was fired from the Examier for all those racy stories on her, well,seems she has paid his rent for a bit. Does that make him a rent boy? lol sorry could not resist? He says they are friends now.

Say what? $$$$$$ Ding Ding Ding
Reply
Ms Agatha said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

@guest1:
Hi Dear…. let me assure you… we all get so much more wet just by being here than you ever have been getting laid…..
Reply
Ms Agatha said on October 24th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

@Pattyanne:
He is a submissive tranny who needs to ‘ copy ‘ gender females ( who act as beards) for his definition of being ‘ femme’ ….. sounds confusing ? … it’s a different world
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:01 pm

LOL, i’d say. I read and re read that and still don’t understand it all. But i do understand that Brad has issues with who and what he is.@Ms Agatha:
Reply
Ms Agatha said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

@Pattyanne:
Had the same thought driving home tonight …. how to get it signed by Ian ?
Reply
Ms Agatha said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

@Pattyanne:
…unless you meet such a person and you fall in love with them…. you need to learn about their world ….otherwise… not
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:10 pm

Perhaps he could make us some stickers with his signature and a number for the copy we have and send them to us? Not the same thing, but close. LOL@Ms Agatha:
Reply
Ms Agatha said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

@Pattyanne:

…lol.. that’s his MO ….he has no idea how to drive a Bike… keeps crashing them at 15 miles/hr and getting picked up by some paid help …. all caused by soar butt wedgie ….wearing her panties for a weak…..her way to punish him without seriously injuring him …lol
Reply
Ms Agatha said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:23 pm

@Pattyanne:
ahhhhh…THAT’S an idea !!! …. Ian, whatathink ?
Reply
Ms Agatha said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

@Ms Agatha:
week …OMG …:) bad typo ..but makes sense..kinda
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 24th, 2009 at 8:54 pm

I know, i read awhile back where he ruined a classic bike by putting gas in the oil intake….what a doofus!@Ms Agatha:
Reply
jeannie said on October 24th, 2009 at 9:26 pm

Nothing against Ian because I’ve been very entertained by this site, but I for one will not buy the book. I figure that anything newsworthy will be all over the blogs instantly. The basic fact behind all of the “Brange” is that Angelina Jolie is obviously mentally ill (and has served time in at least one institution to prove it) and should never have had children–bio or otherwise. This is why she cannot adopt in the US. It’s sad for the kids, but she is not the first or last mentally unstable person to have children. Even sane people can be terrible parents anyway. IMO most people should opt to not have children.
Reply
Vittoria said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:32 pm

@Pattyanne:
I’m with you Patty….what? I trust Ms Agatha on these things though. She has way more knowledge of these things than do we.
Reply
Vittoria said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

@Ms Agatha:
Hi Aggie! Ewwwwwwwwwww! Thanks for that visual. Those panties should probably go to the CDC for testing for strange and awful diseases.
Reply
Astro said on October 24th, 2009 at 11:58 pm

ZZZZZZZzzzZZZZZZZZzzzZZZZZzZZZZZzZZZZZZZZZZZ….
Reply
Tamara said on October 25th, 2009 at 4:37 am

@Pattyanne:
I think he should send us all personal signed books from him to us for being such loyal and faithful regulars! Ian, send us those autographed books please!! I’ll email my address to you, okay hunny????
Reply
Pattyanne said on October 25th, 2009 at 9:14 am

HaHa, Tamara, I second that idea…what do you say IAN? wink, wink~!!@Tamara:
Reply
Tamara said on October 25th, 2009 at 9:19 am

@Pattyanne:
Morning!! Sugar put up a new post, but I can’t even wrap my mind around it! Sounds like a lot of Elton John songs but don’t know how they relate
Reply
benjaminbutton14 said on October 25th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

@Kate:
bb14 I know those 2 booksellers but they are not in Australia that is the reason I asked.
Reply
Kate said on October 25th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

@benjaminbutton14:
BB, Barnes and Noble online ships overseas, Amazon I believe does too. You should be able to order it from their website without any problem at all.
Reply
Tamara said on October 26th, 2009 at 10:53 am

@benjaminbutton14:
Hiya! Barnes and Noble is the name of one store. But can’t you order it from Amazon??
Reply
Lise Richard said on November 5th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

It is gonna be a french translation of your book about Brangelina in the future ?
Reply