There was an interview floating out on the internets that Jolie did Wii “Let’s Pilalates.” I guess we now know that Pilates wasn’t the only thing she was doing. Since the photo is of a woman licking something maybe there was another woman involved with Jolie’s Wii games? Whatever the answer happens to end up being, it’s not a pretty image.
Giving birth to twins is not exactly easy on the abs, but the mother of six (three biological and three adopted) children has been burning through those post-partum pounds with a little help from Nintendo’s Wii fit console. A source close to Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt has told OK! Magazine that “Angelina’s kids were convincing her that video games were more than just fun. They explained to her you can do anything from practice math to learn to read music and exercise.”
@Big Applette:
Yeah, I can just see those kids explaining to her that you can do math and learn to read music on the Wii… I’d be surprised, given that none of them seem to actually go to school, if any of them can read anything, never mind music.
Mad is probably a wicked Guitar Hero champ though…
Ted Casablanca just interviewed the author of a new book on Liz Taylor and guess who TC and the author said the modern-day Liz is? (but Jen Aniston is no modern day Debbie Reynolds either…)
So the kids found her Wii games under the bed and played with them ? Dad and Mom are not at home , busy
looking for work in HW …… so the kids are left alone at home with an armada of help…. obviously they put them in the bedroom , lock the doors and come back the next morning…lol
Oops! Missed the obvious…Wii could be code for “We.” Too much “we” for the couple means they can’t stand being around each other too much. “We” sex games could also mean that they both participate in sex games with each other and others? It could also be a play on words with the meaning “Wheeee” as in fun. Too much sex fun could be bad for the kids because they are growing up in a debauched environment? Could Wii also mean wee as in small? That would have the scariest connotation. Just my humblest of opinions, natch.
Dark Room Sex Game is an award-winning multiplayer, erotic rhythm game without any visuals, played only by audio and haptic cues. The game can be played with Nintendo Wiimote controllers or a keyboard.
Dark Room Sex Game began its sordid life as a project for the 2008 Nordic Game Jam.
The Nordic Game Jam is an annual event held at the IT University of Copenhagen that brings students and professionals together to prototype experimental games over the course of only one weekend. This year, the theme was “Taboo”.
In Dark Room Sex Game, the player works with his or her partner to find a mutual rhythm, then speeds up gradually until climax. In four-player “orgy” mode, players swap partners randomly and compete to reach orgasm the fastest.
When we realized the phallic and rumbling possibilities of the Wiimote controller, we felt oddly compelled to finish the game.
Our idea was that a sex game would in fact be even more erotic if one stripped away all visuals and forced players to use their imaginations. Our hope was to use a combination of humor and embarrassment to make players uncomfortable, yet strangely satisfied. One could view the game as a commentary on the dull fixation on visuals in the spheres of sex and also videogames. Or, you can just view it as a cool party game.
The game was developed by a co-ed, multi-national team of students at the IT University of Copenhagen.
Good point. Nothing up there attributes this one to them, so possibly it’s another HW couple? Lawdy, sure hope it’s not going to be about that phony couple Heidi and Spencer…@sinker:
Good Grief….what has the world come to? Removing the respect, and committment to another person and making intercourse no different than taking a drink of water when thirsty. Sexual intercourse shouldn’t ever be used to pass time or compete with another couple imo, that reduces it to the snake in the garden in my book.@Peri:
@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Keane, thought your ideas on the “back to the future” post was brilliant. I think this has more to do with Ian and Angie also, especially when you put it the way you did.. makes perfect sense. What has thrown me though is the comment.. “got your back, and your back end”. Another poster suggested that Ian has fluffed up the piece to glorify Angie. I certainly hope that isn’t the case, the book won’t be worth buying. I wondered if the part..”juggling water glasses” (a waiter comes to mind ) was in reference to Ian’s undercover work. The last part.. external sunshine (Jennifer), external darkness (Angie) and external pain (Brad) certainly sounds like he’s talking about his book. It also crossed my mind that the beginning part “incandescent ban” meant he (or Brad) wasn’t permitted to talk about Jennifer. Will think some more on it but I loved your ideas.
@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Haa haaa, Keane! Hey … I posted right off that bat that I thought the first part of this one was about why Ian had been shut down for awhile there. I’m at work right now (and am actually quite busy) so I can’t go into it much … grrrrrrrrrrr. But I think you’re right
Also wanted to add that the “incandescent ban” may be something that Ian is not permitted to shed light on.. may not have anything to do with Jennifer at all.
@cuze:
Yep … that was my initial thought on this as well. This is more along my lines of thinking. Much more simple and easier for me to wrap my little mind around. LOL
@Togi:
Hehehe.. I understand completely. I feel so out of my element with some of these puzzles. The posters here are brilliant and I love to read what they write but my mind simply isn’t that sophisticated.
Hiya Togi and Cuze! How are you all doing today? Me? Well, its been raining steadily since last night, a heavy steady rain, so I couldn’t take my dogs for a long walk and they’ve been housebound stir crazy all day LOL
Tom and Katie @ war over Suri’s education (Tom isn’t getting along w/ Katie’s parents [did he ever?])
heads up: ABC is airing a two part series on Nightline starting tonight about the Scilons, mostly based on the St. Petersburg Times articles. Tommy Davis is going to spew fail to Martin Bashir.
I pre-ordered the book. In a few weeks I will find out the truth of it all. It’s either all …..or nothing… simple as that. Until then… everything else is just more speculation …. it will all come down to the book … yea or nay … I will know soon
@mooki:
Wonder what the reason is behind the turnaround of TC?
Hmmm!
From a blind about “Fake a la Ferocity” , and labeling AJ, a “Master Manipulator”; to becoming a minion for Angie. (Trying not to go to his level, here!)
Is there some green changing hands? Ha! Ha! jmo!
There’s no real comparison to Liz, concerning AJ.
Liz MARRIED the man she stole.
Liz was devastated by the loss of the man she truly loved, when he died in a plane crash. That’s when she was vulnerable to Eddie Fisher’s attentiveness.
Liz MARRIED Richard Burton-twice!
Liz MARRIED again and again.
To compare AJ to Liz seems to me to be the biggest insult TC, et al, can hurl at Liz!
Liz never wore a vial of blood from any of her men around her neck. (Or even worse things!)
Liz didn’t go to poverty-stricken countries to publicly adopt babies; nor did she alert the press whenever she did charity work for any reason.
Liz never called out the attack dogs on Debbie.
The list goes on and on!
I hope Ian’s book addresses the above issues!
Liz, or her advisors should put a stop to this nonsense, ASAP!
"Talk Royalty with His Highness", March 5th, 8PM EST, 1AM GMT. Special Guest Noah Levy, Senior Editor In Touch Magazine.
Everybody please remind Ian to hit the Record Button Next Time
The Replay of "Talk Royalty with His Highness" with Special Guest Dawn Olsen is available at:
Click Here to get Alerted by Email for the Next IUCTV Show>
Don’t tell me, Angie listens to Bolero while she “plays” with her wii…snicker
ReplyThere was an interview floating out on the internets that Jolie did Wii “Let’s Pilalates.” I guess we now know that Pilates wasn’t the only thing she was doing. Since the photo is of a woman licking something maybe there was another woman involved with Jolie’s Wii games? Whatever the answer happens to end up being, it’s not a pretty image.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1186378/angelina_jolies_wii_fit_video_games.html
Giving birth to twins is not exactly easy on the abs, but the mother of six (three biological and three adopted) children has been burning through those post-partum pounds with a little help from Nintendo’s Wii fit console. A source close to Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt has told OK! Magazine that “Angelina’s kids were convincing her that video games were more than just fun. They explained to her you can do anything from practice math to learn to read music and exercise.”
Reply@Big Applette:
Yeah, I can just see those kids explaining to her that you can do math and learn to read music on the Wii… I’d be surprised, given that none of them seem to actually go to school, if any of them can read anything, never mind music.
Mad is probably a wicked Guitar Hero champ though…
Reply@Canuck:
Well, you know, Harvard University has nothing on Wii math and science.
Replyhttp://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b149970_tell-all_author_angelina_liz_taylor_all.html
Ted Casablanca just interviewed the author of a new book on Liz Taylor and guess who TC and the author said the modern-day Liz is? (but Jen Aniston is no modern day Debbie Reynolds either…)
ReplySo the kids found her Wii games under the bed and played with them ? Dad and Mom are not at home , busy
Replylooking for work in HW …… so the kids are left alone at home with an armada of help…. obviously they put them in the bedroom , lock the doors and come back the next morning…lol
Oops! Missed the obvious…Wii could be code for “We.” Too much “we” for the couple means they can’t stand being around each other too much. “We” sex games could also mean that they both participate in sex games with each other and others? It could also be a play on words with the meaning “Wheeee” as in fun. Too much sex fun could be bad for the kids because they are growing up in a debauched environment? Could Wii also mean wee as in small? That would have the scariest connotation. Just my humblest of opinions, natch.
ReplyYea, Wii works, but so does being a druggie. Wink@Big Applette:
Reply@Pattyanne:
Reply…some do the Skype …others do the Wii ….. but only real people do the real thing
http://www.themoneytimes.com/featured/20091022/travolta-extortion-case-judge-declares-mistrial-id-1088233.html
Mistrial in Travolta case!
Replyi don’t think this is AJ and BP.
ReplyThere IS an actual Wii sex game.
***********
Dark Room Sex Game is an award-winning multiplayer, erotic rhythm game without any visuals, played only by audio and haptic cues. The game can be played with Nintendo Wiimote controllers or a keyboard.
Dark Room Sex Game began its sordid life as a project for the 2008 Nordic Game Jam.
The Nordic Game Jam is an annual event held at the IT University of Copenhagen that brings students and professionals together to prototype experimental games over the course of only one weekend. This year, the theme was “Taboo”.
In Dark Room Sex Game, the player works with his or her partner to find a mutual rhythm, then speeds up gradually until climax. In four-player “orgy” mode, players swap partners randomly and compete to reach orgasm the fastest.
When we realized the phallic and rumbling possibilities of the Wiimote controller, we felt oddly compelled to finish the game.
Our idea was that a sex game would in fact be even more erotic if one stripped away all visuals and forced players to use their imaginations. Our hope was to use a combination of humor and embarrassment to make players uncomfortable, yet strangely satisfied. One could view the game as a commentary on the dull fixation on visuals in the spheres of sex and also videogames. Or, you can just view it as a cool party game.
The game was developed by a co-ed, multi-national team of students at the IT University of Copenhagen.
*********
Link and video here: http://attuworld.com/just-attu/dark-room-sex-game-for-wii.html
ReplyGood point. Nothing up there attributes this one to them, so possibly it’s another HW couple? Lawdy, sure hope it’s not going to be about that phony couple Heidi and Spencer…@sinker:
ReplyGood Grief….what has the world come to? Removing the respect, and committment to another person and making intercourse no different than taking a drink of water when thirsty. Sexual intercourse shouldn’t ever be used to pass time or compete with another couple imo, that reduces it to the snake in the garden in my book.@Peri:
Replyi’m going with Ewan MacGregor and his wife – known to be freaks
ReplyYo can I get some feedback on my theories out here? I need your opinions! Where is the love folks?! Lol
Reply@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
ReplyKeane, thought your ideas on the “back to the future” post was brilliant. I think this has more to do with Ian and Angie also, especially when you put it the way you did.. makes perfect sense. What has thrown me though is the comment.. “got your back, and your back end”. Another poster suggested that Ian has fluffed up the piece to glorify Angie. I certainly hope that isn’t the case, the book won’t be worth buying. I wondered if the part..”juggling water glasses” (a waiter comes to mind ) was in reference to Ian’s undercover work. The last part.. external sunshine (Jennifer), external darkness (Angie) and external pain (Brad) certainly sounds like he’s talking about his book. It also crossed my mind that the beginning part “incandescent ban” meant he (or Brad) wasn’t permitted to talk about Jennifer. Will think some more on it but I loved your ideas.
@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Hey … I posted right off that bat that I thought the first part of this one was about why Ian had been shut down for awhile there. I’m at work right now (and am actually quite busy) so I can’t go into it much … grrrrrrrrrrr. But I think you’re right
ReplyHaa haaa, Keane!
Also wanted to add that the “incandescent ban” may be something that Ian is not permitted to shed light on.. may not have anything to do with Jennifer at all.
Reply@cuze:
ReplyYep … that was my initial thought on this as well. This is more along my lines of thinking. Much more simple and easier for me to wrap my little mind around. LOL
@Togi:
ReplyHehehe.. I understand completely. I feel so out of my element with some of these puzzles. The posters here are brilliant and I love to read what they write but my mind simply isn’t that sophisticated.
@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
Hiya! How are you doing? FYI I left a comment under the oblong box thread.
Hiya Togi and Cuze! How are you all doing today? Me? Well, its been raining steadily since last night, a heavy steady rain, so I couldn’t take my dogs for a long walk and they’ve been housebound stir crazy all day LOL
Replyhttp://www.celebitchy.com/75932/in_touch_katie_holmes_at_war_with_tom_cruise/
Tom and Katie @ war over Suri’s education (Tom isn’t getting along w/ Katie’s parents [did he ever?])
heads up: ABC is airing a two part series on Nightline starting tonight about the Scilons, mostly based on the St. Petersburg Times articles. Tommy Davis is going to spew fail to Martin Bashir.
Reply@Pattyanne:
Reply… rabbiting… what’s love got to do with it … welcome to HW
I pre-ordered the book. In a few weeks I will find out the truth of it all. It’s either all …..or nothing… simple as that. Until then… everything else is just more speculation …. it will all come down to the book … yea or nay … I will know soon
ReplyzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZ
Reply@mooki:
Wonder what the reason is behind the turnaround of TC?
Hmmm!
From a blind about “Fake a la Ferocity” , and labeling AJ, a “Master Manipulator”; to becoming a minion for Angie. (Trying not to go to his level, here!)
Is there some green changing hands? Ha! Ha! jmo!
There’s no real comparison to Liz, concerning AJ.
Liz MARRIED the man she stole.
Liz was devastated by the loss of the man she truly loved, when he died in a plane crash. That’s when she was vulnerable to Eddie Fisher’s attentiveness.
Liz MARRIED Richard Burton-twice!
Liz MARRIED again and again.
To compare AJ to Liz seems to me to be the biggest insult TC, et al, can hurl at Liz!
Liz never wore a vial of blood from any of her men around her neck. (Or even worse things!)
Liz didn’t go to poverty-stricken countries to publicly adopt babies; nor did she alert the press whenever she did charity work for any reason.
Liz never called out the attack dogs on Debbie.
The list goes on and on!
I hope Ian’s book addresses the above issues!
Liz, or her advisors should put a stop to this nonsense, ASAP!
ReplyThank you! You often write very interesting articles. You improved my mood.
Replyhttp://www.nationalenquirer.com/dick_clark_dead_within_months_american_bandstand_/celebrity/67546
ReplyDick Clark might be gone by year’s end…
a fly with no wings would be called a bug…and you cant call panties pants LOL and for you poop guy go slit your own own throat!
ReplyБлеск.
Reply“я в восторге от Вашего стиля”
Reply“Побольше бы таких статей”
Replyих больше было О_о
Reply