IUC Fashion: Megan vs. Angie, Who’s Hotter?

Posted on October 2nd, 2009 by Erin H in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Fashion

meganandangieI’m going to go out on a limb here and say something that might not be comforting to those of us whose mothers have convinced us that we’re beautiful even though, well, we’re not. Our eyelashes are short, we have stringy unkempt hair, our lips are shriveled and thin and we only wish our thighs could donate some of their excess to our breasts. We’re normal women, we might be nice, but we’re not beautiful. In other words – sorry Oprah – beauty is not skin deep: it’s dewy skin, sparkling eyes, long slender legs, a round tight ass, a sleek taut abdomen and a pouty glossy mouth.

There are umpteen women who emanate these highly coveted qualities but two ladies who unquestionably fall under the category of beauty – pure and simple – are Megan Fox and Angelina Jolie. So, when pondering the beauty of these spectacular starlets, one does not wonder if they are beautiful but how the women differ and why one is more attractive than the other.

There is a fine line between skanky and dangerous. And I believe the impalpable boundary is the deciding factor in the beauty competition between Jolie and Fox. Poor Fox may have adopted a stage name that puts her into the stealthy animal class, but it is precisely this attempt at being carnal and sexy that exposes her desperation. Though Fox’s hotness is undeniable, her raw appeal is damaged by a persona that screams, “I want you,” rather than the far more attractive, “you want me.”

If you haven’t guessed by now, my vote goes to Jolie. Countless times Angelina has been described as statuesque by the media but the overwhelming enchantress is too alluring to be classified as such. Unlike Fox, Jolie has a ‘thereness’ about her that isn’t blasé but has a kind of claim to it. Jolie owns her beauty – every last inch of it – whereas Fox direly projects it outward. Jolie’s beauty is threatening because it is perfectly connected to her, whereas Fox’s allurement appears implausible for the sole reason that she so unflinchingly clings to it.

Oh and Megan Fox has really weird thumbs.

Erin Hershberg is IUC Fashion Editor

  1. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:13 am

    Oooookaaaaay – Ian – WTF is going on? Why are you inundating us with these posts on how absolutely gorgeous AJ is??? When was the last time she was so beautiful – because it certainly isn’t as of TODAY!!

    it’s dewy skin – ummm did anyone see the pasty white sweating skin she sported in Cannes??
    sparkling eyes – well, if you mean glassy eyes, well then yes
    long slender legs – skinny ropey veins with bones sticking out of her feet – in a word YUCK
    a round tight ass – okay we’ve all seen her flat skinny ass in Gia!!
    a sleek taut abdomen – highly representative of the refugees she so valiantly champions for
    and a pouty glossy mouth – give the girl some lip gloss for the cracks in her overdone collagen mouth

    Reply
  2. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:13 am

    WHY is my post in Italics??

    Reply
  3. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Plllleeeeeeeeeeeeze turn OFF the italics

    Reply
  4. wtfomglol said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Oh god, Ian’s become pro-Brangie. What did they to do you Ian??!!! Someone get an antidote, stat.

    Reply
  5. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:26 am

    @wtfomglol:
    Nope, Im pretty sure he wants us to contradict it, which is easy to do considering! ha

    Reply
  6. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:45 am

    http://www.barelypolitical.com/post/7654/angelina-jolie-drug-den-video-john-mccain-viagra-shirt
    ““““““`Angie Jo at the Drug Den video“““““““““`

    http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s20/clearview1975/4l5aryg.gif
    ““““video showing proof of Angie Jo’s nose job“““““““““

    Angelina Jolie is not in any way a starlet (def: a young movie actress being coached and publicized for starring roles.) In fact there is some proof out there that Angelina Jolie is in fact 39 y/o rather than the 34 she claims to be.

    Angelina Jolie is not a natural beauty by any means. There is proof on the internet of multiple plastic surgery procedures through the years: eyebrow life to give her the “cat eye” effect, multiple nose jobs to remove the wide nostrel’s gradually , cheek implants, chin implant, breast augmentation at least once. Takes $$$$$$$

    For any of this to show up in a book would make that book simply a compilation of all that has been posted on the internet over the past year. Google Angelina Jolie and read to your heart’s content.

    And, excuse me Erin, but my mother did not lie. Wink!

    Reply
  7. wtfomglol said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:48 am

    Ok, but why would he want that?? He already knows what most of his readers think of her.

    Reply
  8. ladybert62 said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:52 am

    They are both beautiful on the surface to some people – neither one is to me – both are low lifes. Just my opinion of course. :D

    Reply
  9. keane cyber queen supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:53 am

    I agree, Angelina’s plastic surgeon definitely does better work than Megan’s. I always figured that was because Megan still has one foot in the trailer park but Angie Jo has all that dough she made off selling them bebes so she can afford the best. In a few yrs time and a few more kids down the road Megan will look just as purdy as Angie. Kids=top-class surgery=beauty these days. Hey these kind of natural beauties don’t come cheap!

    Reply
  10. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 11:56 am

    IAN~! Did Angie Jo change your mind while in France? You’ve certainly done a 360 here, and if this dribble is what your book is about, i certainly won’t be buying it. Too many people know the truth of Brangelina by now to be “tricked”.
    “It Is What It Is”..and everyone knows what it is by now. You are putting yourself, and your credibility on a limb here.

    Reply
  11. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    Can someone please explain to me the italics?? It bugs the sh!t out of me! LOL

    Reply
  12. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    I think Ian is actually looking for us to contradict this story for some weird reason!

    Keane – is that really you or someone using your name? It doesn’t sound like you…..

    I’m off for awhile TTYL

    Reply
  13. Togi said on October 2nd, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    @:
    LOL. Tam, unfortunately, I can’t contradict this one. As horribly skinny and saggy as she is right now, and as much as I don’t like the things she does, I still have to admit to myself that AJ is MUCH prettier than Megan Fox. AJ has such a warm smile, though it’s my OPINION the smile doesn’t reach her heart. But it is a pretty smile when it’s not all big and horsey. Megan has a FAR superior figure, IMO, and better hair, and a better nose and prettier eyes. But that “Megan Fox has really weird thumbs” comment gave the edge to Ange. Baahaa haaaa.

    Reply
  14. Togi said on October 2nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Oh, that stinks! I just responded to Tamara’s previous post and it disappeared! Okay … let’s see if I can rehash.

    As much as I would like to contradict the opinion in this story, I simply cannot. As skinny and saggy as AJ is right now, and as much as I don’t like the things she stands for, I have to admit to myself that I find AJ much more attractive than Megan Fox. Though I am certain it never reaches her heart, I find AJ’s smile very warm and inviting. IMO, Megan has a FAR superior figure, prettier eyes, nose and hair, that comment about her “really weird thumbs” sent me completely over to the AJ side. That comment was hilarious!

    Reply
  15. guest1 said on October 2nd, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    Erin Hershberg is IUC Fashion Editor

    Reply
  16. Kate said on October 2nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    I would like to know how in the hell you can compare a 2o something to a 36 year old mother , and I will not add another word to that even though that is what she is. IF you were to compare Angelina to her at the same age you would get the same results. At least Megan did not kiss her brother at the Oscars, and regardless of what the story is behind that, IF that does not scream desperation to you, I do not know what would.

    I would say this is an attempt at conditioning , getting people ready for what is to come, sort of like when two people are seen apart all the time with their kids for photo opps so when the split it will not be a shock.

    Hope I am wrong about that, but IAN is always honest in his assessment when he writes a book, and if he has changed his mind he has.

    Reply
  17. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    @Tamara:
    I would hope that to be the case Tamara, otherwise the months of April and May were feeding us false information. I cannot understand all this sudden Angelina Jolie Adoration though. We know her outter beauty is plastic surgeon created, and we also know, thanks to IAN’s many posts about Brangelina over many month, especially April thru May, that Angelina has NO inner beauty…so yes, i hope there is a very good reason for this.

    Reply
  18. Kate said on October 2nd, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    When I have time, Is it Erin? I will go find ever wierd quote Angelina said when she was Megans age. I will find all the stunts she pulled that not just screamed desperation, but shouted, and there are hundreds of pictures as well.

    Did you do any research at all on this before you wrote it? I am not trying to be unkind, but why not compare two woman of the same level, same age, same social status, A list, beauty, had the same amount of plastic surgery. Does this truly seem like a honest question to you, or did you just throw it up there?

    It is totally and to borrow a word from IAN, utterly unblievable that one would compare the two. Just because the tabloids do, are we trying to now stoop to their level?

    Serioulsy? Megan Fox is a sillly immature young woman trying to make a name for herself in all the wrong ways, and you are comparing her to a grown woman, of 36 years old, who does drugs , (according to Ted) has six children, pimps them out like a pet poodle at dog show (only not nearly groomed as well) has tried to committ suicide two times (IAN) , and the list goes on….

    Seriously…..

    Now honestly, please , take a look at the thing that came out of her mouth (and if you can stomach it , the things that went into her mouth (IAN) when she was Megans age, and then come back and tell us if you would vote the same way. No one tried harder tham Angelina Voight to say “look at me” than she did. Stripping half naked and letting a horse lick her breasts says it all.

    I don’t even want to think about the other revelation that IAN revealed with the famlily dog. Has Megan got dog? Just asking?

    My vote goes to doing more homework before these kind of things are put up.

    Sorry IAN, love ya, but you know this is a ridiculous question. Kate

    Reply
  19. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @Kate:
    Here! Hear! Very Well Said Kate.

    Reply
  20. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    http://www.unhcr.org/4ac61fae9.html

    Brad and Angie together on an UNHCR Ambassador visit to Damaskus to talk with Iraqi refugees. Brad plays with the kiddies while angie puts forth once again her, “I am sooooo sorry for you” best impression to a helpless refugee, while she’s dressed in what appears to be a white , chiffon, evening dress ???

    Reply
  21. Kate said on October 2nd, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @guest1:
    Yes, well aware of that, also a good friend of IAN’s, he had to approve for it to be posted, which is why I said, sorry IAN love ya, but this is a ridiculous question.

    I understand research , and I know he is busy and may be on the road or still in LA, but this honestly make no sense at all. Anyone who is familiar with all of the things Angelina said and did at the age Megan is could not possibly think Megan is more wierd than that, and anyone who is looks at Angelina today at 36 and compares her to Megan can not possibly think she looks hotter.

    So I ask, is Erin asking purely on looks, and asking we throw away all that wierdness at 22 years old 14 years old and presently for Megan? Is she asking that we try very very hard to imagine Angelina 10 years ago and compare her hotness then to Megan’s hotness now?

    You can not have it both ways. Show we go back in time and revisit Angelina, or should be go into the furture to bring Ms Fox up to where Angelina is to compare?

    Which is it? Again, ridiculous.

    Affectionately, Kate

    Reply
  22. Kate said on October 2nd, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    Tha@Kate:
    That should read 14 years-ago

    I think many feel insulted that we would be so stupid to compare-

    and affectionately-Kate

    Reply
  23. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    Looking beyond any ulterior reasons Ian may have in allowing this post to go up, and disregarding the “allure” or the “it” factor that Erin thinks puts Jolie on the plus side of the debate, I still think AJ does not have the same allure or “it” that she used to have. Megan Fox is too stupid and self centered, with her 4th grade education she isn’t attractive to me at all, she is the epitome of what every stupid narcissistic wannabee starlet strives for: to be admired for looks first talent second. And then when they age and the looks fade they have absolutely nothing left to fall back on.

    Reply
  24. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Wow – is there a refugee they won’t pose with? Seriously it’s like one a week at the moment! For God’s sake Angelina give it an effing rest already, give the displaced people of the world a breather. We get it. YOU CARE. Precisely. What the f*ck ever.

    Reply
  25. too curious said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    I’d like to vote for choice #3…WHOEVER that is!

    Reply
  26. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @too curious:
    Lmbooooo ~! I think a lot of us would.

    Reply
  27. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I’d respect her more if she’d appeared in Damaskus dressed head to toe in a black leather cat suit..lol. At least then i’d know it’s the real Angie.

    Reply
  28. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @Kate:

    Yeah ITA Kate I laughed out loud when I read this post earlier on today I thought it was so ridiculous to tell the truth. This is sub-Perez level stuff it really is. So you want to go for the “Angelina is prettier than everyone therefore she wins” old chestnut hey Erin? I think you’ll find the Angelina vs Jen PR bandwagon and the flag-waving, stompeding loons it trails in it’s wake have beaten that one to death a long ass time ago, it’s beyond old. And just one other little point: had you ever considered that when trying to endear yourself to the 99.9% female readership of a gossip blog, a good way to start may not be to tell them all how – in comparison to Angelina of course – they are frankly ugly? Nice, maybe, but ugly nonetheless. Not like Angelina at all in fact who is a grade A bitch who couldn’t even spell the word “morals” let alone use them, but at least she’s a tappable bit of ass hey? Effin’ great, just what the world needs, another insecure witch who tries to make herself feel better inside by declaring herself inherently superior to all other women and her junior impersonator. And you want us to join in discussing which one of these allegedly superior women is more inherently superior than the other? No thanks love, I think I’ll stick to talking about something that goes vaguely beyond skin level ta. And seriousoly Ian, if this is the kind of drivel you think will entertain the masses in your absence you really didn’t know us at all. What a shame.

    Reply
  29. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Thank you Keane. Very well said.

    Reply
  30. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @too curious:

    Yeah me f*cking too, too curious, me effing too. I’ll go for choice number 3 whoever the hell that is. Seriously is this Angelina’s new PR scheme or something? Ange vs Jen doesn’t sell any more so now she’s trying to get us to pit her against Megan? Well Ange I guess anything is worth a try these days isn’t it – it’s not like you’ve got many options left.

    Reply
  31. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Regardless of whether this is Angies new spin or not, the question has to be asked, why is Ian posting it? Why has he turned the blog into an AJ lovefest all of a sudden? Something doesnt feel right to me and I can’t figure out what it is.

    Reply
  32. too curious said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    Erin I’m guessing that you are fairly young, at least in terms of life experience. True beauty comes from within. All the plastic surgery in the world can’t hide an ugly soul.

    You want to know what men find really sexy? A living, breathing woman who is ready to have sex with them ;)

    Reply
  33. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    @too curious:
    LOL they don’t expect much do they? haha

    Reply
  34. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    Erin – are you a man in drag? I can’t tell from your photo, but I have to think you’re a man, because I can’t imagine any woman coming out with some of the stuff you just said in this article. In an era where women all over the world are trying to overcome the stereotype of what beauty is (Dove ads anyone??) you come out with something like this that effectively shoots us right back to the 50’s where beauty was indeed skin deep and women were supposed to speak when spoken to, and no man ever wanted to hear their opinions. I can’t imagine any woman writing this kind of article – who are you????

    Reply
  35. too curious said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @Tamara:

    Tam, remember when Ted C. was on vacation and his staff was writing the Awful Truth? I find this to be somewhat parallel. Or when Jay Leno asks people on the street basic questions and they can’t answer? I saw one on his commercial for the new show where he asks a woman how many stars are on the U.S. flag flying nearby and she says “it’s moving too fast to count them”.

    Although I’d think a fashion editor would discuss women who are involved with fashion, modeling, something of that nature, but what do I know?? The flag is moving too fast…

    Reply
  36. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @too curious:
    Roflmboooooo you got that right TC~!

    Reply
  37. too curious said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    OMG, what if this was all said tongue i cheek and we’re being too oblivious to catch it?? I hope so!

    Reply
  38. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @too curious:
    LOL I know! I was just sitting here thinking, this Erin is a fashion editor? WTF does that have to do with who is hotter MF or AJ? I am still incensed over the first paragraph, seriously!!! So lets say some young girls mother has been telling her she is beautiful and she was finally starting to believe her, when she reads an article like this and all of a sudden she’s starving herself, plumping her lips with collagen and straightening her beautiful naturally curly hair because now it appears her mother has been lying to her and if she doesn’t look like Megan Fox then she is an Ugly Betty and will be for life unless she does an Octo Mom and turns herself into an AJ clone, its infuriating!!

    Reply
  39. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @too curious:

    Too curious, that is too true. I was just looking at this story on http://www.holymoly.co.uk and laughing my head off. Angelina is just like these women, this is exactly what she offers men:

    http://www.holymoly.com/celebrity-news/sunday-sport-party-valbonne-studio-makes-women-take-their-tops36348

    Reply
  40. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @too curious:
    LOl or who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue…but they know who lives in a shell at the bottom of the sea! hahahaha

    Reply
  41. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Tamara:

    That occurred to me too Tam, that a piece of crap like that could not have been written by a woman. If it was then shame on her. When your knees are nobbly and your skin is wrinkly and everyone writes you off as “nice but ugly” Erin, I’m sure you’ll change your tune.

    Reply
  42. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    ….AND God forbid you should have an abnormality, such as “wierd” thumbs, because that will put you right out of the running. So any of you young girls who have kinky hair, short legs, thin lips, flat ass, need not apply for the beauty card in life, you will not be admitted..

    Reply
  43. too curious said on October 2nd, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @Tamara:

    But freaky “man hands” are sexy apparently…

    Reply
  44. Astro said on October 2nd, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    IAN: The true in pictures!!!

    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie Visit Iraqi Refugees …..NO Break up, the Jolie-Pitt’s are doing FINE!

    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009/10/brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-visit-iraqi-refugees

    Reply
  45. erm said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    Riiiggghhhht. Offensive, no?:
    I’m going to go out on a limb here and say something that might not be comforting to those of us whose mothers have convinced us that we’re beautiful even though, well, we’re not. Our eyelashes are short, we have stringy unkempt hair, our lips are shriveled and thin and we only wish our thighs could donate some of their excess to our breasts. We’re normal women, we might be nice, but we’re not beautiful.
    Are you for real??????????

    Smacks.of.intelligence.and.integrity.

    Reply
  46. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    Something I was talking about with some people elsewhere, they suggested I post it here, so here it is with some adjustments:

    Even if the brother stuff and the dog stuff weren’t true Angelina has still clearly tried to destroy Jennifer Aniston’s career (not to mention stealing her husband and flaunting his new happy family in her face); sold not only her biological kids but vulnerable adopted children for cash; broken international adoption laws; exploited her children for PR; sold herself as a hands-on mom when in reality she has a huge staff of nannies and seems to have no bond with any of her kids but Maddox; exploits her “UN work” and the most vulnerable people in the world to promote herself (making herself look as glam as possible in the process); exploits the death of her mother to try to gain public sympathy and remain the most powerful celeb in the world; and even blamed her weight loss due to whatever substance she is ingesting on the poor woman whose career she already tried to end and whose marriage she destroyed; and God alone knows what is going on with the twins or lack of them. She is an evil, manipulative devil and I don’t need a single source to tell people that, all I need to do is analyse her PR strategy. Ian if you can’t even put that sentence together between two sheets of paper and tell the world what Brangelina are really about then it really is a sorry state of affairs. I have my own ethical axe to grind right now, and I have no time for this. If people can’t stand up for what they believe in then I am out of here. There are real problems in the real world to deal with, and I don’t need another sucker who peddles her sycophantic fluff. And yes I am very pissed off right now but Brangelina are just one element of a significant proportion of society who do what they do for the cash and their own glory and screw everyone else. If Ian can’t see that and is going to pin all the blame for her behaviour on someoone else then he’s not what I thought he was. A bad childhood does not justify the evil nonsense she has perpetrated on others for her own ends, there is such a thing as personal responsibility. You can shoot me down if I’m wrong Ian but right now I don’t know what to think. There has to be someone in the world who has ethics somewhere surely.

    Reply
  47. Kate said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    Since we are discussing “desperation” I wonder, how deperate is it for Angie Jo to copy a woman that we all admire so much , including IAN, Audrey Hepburn, right down to her dress, her hair, her facial expression, her pose, when she is getting bad headlines.

    Now that is not only desperation, it is pathetic. I don’t even care if any of the sex things that were discussed on here are in the book, if her fauxhumanitarian is covered, among a long list of other things , but they all have something to do with being a fraud and a Great Deception, which we were told exist.

    If that is not the case, I would like to know now.

    Reply
  48. cuze said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    Angelina must be one of those women who look better in person than in pictures. That is what goes through my mind every time I read an article about how beautiful she is because I honestly don’t see it. I think she looks fine, yes, but beautiful??? I’ve had co workers, friends, relatives and seen strangers on the street I thought were more beautiful than she. I wouldn’t want to look like her. Not because she isn’t attractive but because there is nothing striking about her, IMO. Certainly nothing to get all worked up over her. I feel the same way about Fox… yawn.. nothing special. I guess it’s just different the way a man looks at a woman and the way a woman looks at another woman. They see different things. Maybe that explains the appeal.. ????

    Reply
  49. erm said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    Halperin this seriously is gutter “journalism” (and I use that in the loosest term) – what’s next? are you going to write some nonsensical pival about how good-looking, articulate, talented, good-looking and pretty much perfect BP is? I myself might go out on a limb here and assert that, without wanting to create too much discomfort, maybe not all “pop-culture commentators” are quite as “beautiful”, and wish they were taller, thinner, wealthier etc etc etc etc???
    Oh, and being someone that actually works in fashion, I can assure you (and “Erin”, SRR or 9 cents nonsense), neither AJ nor MF are viewed as being paragons of elegance or style. Seriously. WTF?

    Reply
  50. ladybert62 said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    @too curious:
    too curious – that was an hysterical post! Thanks – you made me laugh out loud. :D

    Reply
  51. ladybert62 said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    @Tamara:
    Hi Tamara – I agree with what you said – however, maybe the article was not meant to be taken at face value and it was just food for thought and discussion! It seems to me that Ian likes to “stir the pot” – if you know what I mean! I dont take it seriously! Peace. :D

    Reply
  52. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    @Kate:

    Or posing in a top which deliberately reveals her collar bones to expose how thin she is to try to get sympathetic press while she is supposed to be highlighting the plight of refugees from one of the most violent, lawless and hellish countries on earth? A place that millions of innocent, vulnerable and helpless people can not fly out of on their private jet back to some 40 million dollar mansion somewhere. Can you think of many things more desperately cynical, manipulative and yes, genuinely evil, than that? And then when you think that screw couldn’t possibly get any tighter to come back home and get your PR to leak a story to the National Enquirer blaming your weight loss on none other than Jennifer Aniston (who apparently is responsible for all the sins of the world however far removed she is from them) with the photo of you in Kenya splashed all over the front page? Could she seriously get much worse? AND when we all bloody well know that eonline reporter Ted Casablanca has implicitly pointed the finger at her serious drug addiction for some time now and explicitly said that she “needs to get help”, which call me old-fashioned, sounds like a slightly more plauisble reason for her weight loss to me! Honestly, I really have heard it all from this woman, and here we are being asked to debate whether she’s hotter than Megan Fox or not?! Do you seriously think anyone cares about that? Why have we been wasting our time talking about this all this time if all we care about is f*cking looks. Jesus effing Christ. My apologies for all the swearing, blaspheming etc, I am sorry but I am pissed right now, as I’m sure you all can see.

    Reply
  53. DebFrmHell said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    This is the Keane I used to know! Well stated! And Welcome back!

    Reply
  54. ladybert62 said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    TO PattyAnne – since I have always thought of you as the most knowledgeable on this site re psychology, (as least as far as I have perceived). perhaps you didnt seen the question I posed on the other silly thread re Madonna and Jesus:

    “What does it say about a person who has his own name tattooed on his back? So that absolutely no one forgets who he is even when his face is not showing? Interesting question for you psych majors out there – is it inferiority or narcissism? ha ha”

    I am really curious about what you think concerning this – from a psychological point of view, why does one tattoo his own name on his back? Peace and thanks. :P

    Reply
  55. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2009/10/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-

    JustJared seems to have a lower opinion of Angie and Brad now a days, considering he only posted a very small block on their UNCHR sponsored trip to Damaskus. The above photo shows the very concerned Jolie wearing her (appears to be) white chiffon gown , while gazing into the eyes of a refugee wearing blue jeans. Geesh!

    Reply
  56. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    She certainly knows how to get to the heart of the matter.

    Reply
  57. mooki said on October 2nd, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    ’90s press conference discussing cult infilatration of the media, featuring ex-Moonies as guest speakers. The Unification Church is the main focus of this nearly two hr. vid, w/ the Scilons, JWs, Mormons, and other lesser known cults mentioned throughout:
    http://www.xenutv.com/blog/?p=63

    Reply
  58. mooki said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/haf_sister_bijou_phillips_disgusted_mackenzie_phillips_incest_rape_john_phillips/celebrity/67406

    Scilon Bijou Phillips, now saying that she is “disgusted” by sis Mackenzie’s book. Now I’m doubting if Mackenzie is really a Scilon….

    Reply
  59. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    @ladybert62:
    To answer you honestly, i would have to say it could mean many things. One would have to know the background of the particular person , as well their emotional condition. Obviously i don’t, and as i do not have a degree in psychology, i would hate to attach a name to a person falsely.

    Usually tattoos are used as status symbols, or may be a declaration of love (narcisssism as you suggested , or for another), amulets, signs of religious beliefs. With so many possibilities, for a layperson to make a statement as truth would be dangerous, therefore i will leave the judgement up to you.

    Reply
  60. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    That’s just what Jolie wears (or is advised to wear) because she thinks she looks culturally appropriate. When it’s the turn of some Africa-based refugees to be exploited for her PR campaign, I fully expect her to be sporting an afro. Not that that would be culturally appropriate or reflect how people typically style their hair in Africa of course, but you know her and Trevor are dumb enough to think so.

    Reply
  61. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Well, she does have a way of making sure she “stands out” in a photo shoot. Could this be deliberate ya think?

    Reply
  62. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    Ted C. is reporting OK Mag. claims that Jen and John M. are back together is FALSE. Thank gawd~! Once was enough with that one i’d say.

    Reply
  63. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    I think she’s into chicks these days to be perfectly honest. Mayer is just one of the show dudes.

    Reply
  64. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I have to agree with you Keane. I’ve wondered about her choices in men since her divorce, and it seems to me they are all men who , for one reason or another, will not commit to a lasting relationship. And none of the pairings lasted much past the current movie shoot either. Beards? Beginning to wonder, seriously.

    Reply
  65. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    Wouldn’t it be funny if it were Angie and Jennifer who were having the affair while Jennifer was married to Brad? And Jen was supposed to have been ready to end the marriage pre-Jolie and Brad anyway? Brad wants kids, Angie wants a married man, wallah! Jen get’s her freedom, Brad gets the Rainbow Tribe, Jolie gets HW status as BP’s baby momma….win, win, win. Then they set up the uproar in the press!! Again, we have win, win, win. The publicity generated by such pap reports keeps all three on top of the HW popularity list….hummmmmmmm

    Reply
  66. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    @Pattyanne:

    Nah I think Ange has taste!

    Ok got to go to bed so night all but before I do I just wanted to give a major eye roll to things that are making my eyes roll into the back of my head right now. Eye rolling is a totally different scenario to pissed of course, it’s more a case of “bitch, please!” than it is anger. And people who know me will know who or what I am rolling my eyes at: silly people of course. Night all anyway, catch you later!

    Reply
  67. too curious said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    I was looking at the AJ & BP in Syria pics – anybody else notice AJ had a purse big enough to smuggle a child in? Not that I would EVER accuse her of buying or stealing children…

    I think the white gauzy overdress is to make her look saintly. (I couldn’t even type that without snorting).

    Reply
  68. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    God I meant Jen there, I think Jen has taste. Time to hit the hay!

    Reply
  69. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Good night Keane. Rest well. Was good chatting with you as always g/f.

    Reply
  70. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    @too curious:
    Lmboooo TC. How true. It’s like trying to hide a snake in a birdcage. Poor AJ, she has NO clue her public has caught on to her ploys now, and refuses to be manipulated any longer. How i loved her back when…..Tomb Raider dayz, the wild child of HW. She could have kept that personna imo, and risen to the heights of fame, but her loins doomed her, just as her tattoo across her pubic bone area says, “That Which Nurishes Me Also Destroys Me”

    Reply
  71. too curious said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    Good night Keane.

    Think I’m going to sign off for a while. Talk to y’all later!

    Reply
  72. Pattyanne said on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    @too curious:
    Same here, been a long day, went out to dinner with friends and hit the outlet malls. got an awsome new Coach handbag though….sleep well TC

    Reply
  73. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    OK… so Ian has changed his mind …WTF …. I HAVE NOT ! ….. UNLESS I am getting that transfer to my offshore accounts ……!!!

    KEANE !…..PATTYANNE !… I love you guys ! …. Maybe it’s time to move on ! I’m coming with you !

    Reply
  74. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    This is NOT a controversial devil’s advocate’s but a DEVIL”S FART post Ms Erin !!! To all of you : Enjoy the money !. Payola is Biz Prostitution….

    Reply
  75. mooki said on October 2nd, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-02-suri-goes-to-school

    Katie Holmes takes Suri to non-Scilon pre-school. hmmm…

    Reply
  76. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    I really don’t care what your intentions are Ms Erin ( and enablers) …. but whatever you want to generate … you ain’t gettin it… this will bring in neither money nor fame nor status…. just your run of the mill celebrity sucker …. hopefully the payola was worth it…you just sank the Titanic

    Reply
  77. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    Tell me if I am wrong Ms Erin… but aren’t you a Fashion Editor ? …. I am presently reading Cathy Horyn’s (my fav fashion editor) take on Milan’s Fashion Week. What do you think about Milan’s Fashion Houses this year ? Did you think that Karl Lagerfeld had anything to do with the boudoir show at Fendi ? And what did you make of it ? Really interested to know your take on it. What about the sari and the Saharian jackets we got to see in Milano ? But maybe you didn’t get to see the Milano Shows but rather went to Paris ? So what did you think about Nicolas Ghesquiere Show ? Did you find it new enough ? Because I didn’t . But maybe you went to Balmain instead ? Balenciaga anyone ? Ms Fashion editor, let me know , from one pro to another …. Rick Owen, now that one must get you going ? Or does it? ….. I am just so confused that you would find time RIGHT NOW … when Milan just finished, Paris just started … you got time to write about somebody called FOX ? and somebody from OLD HW called Jolie ? …well I guess… we all need to make a living… some better than others … cheerio M’am

    Reply
  78. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Hey go over to the IUC hostility thread on FF. Lavonda outted herself and you will not guess who she is!

    Reply
  79. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    I got news for you…. GD always knew … sorry

    Reply
  80. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    W&W … thanks anyway ….. you’d be amazed what else we know ….LOL

    Reply
  81. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    I am Lavonda. Deal with it.

    Reply
  82. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Really, we won’t.

    Reply
  83. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    Ms Erin… and BTW… how dare you bring my mother into the mix….. I am a very beautiful woman DESPITE what my mother told me when I was a kid !!! ….. Here is some information how to make yourself sick : You must be one hell of a victim of your mother’s lies ….. get help but don’t project that BS on us… we are all pretty hot… and we got the photos to prove it !

    Reply
  84. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    REALLY, and you all kept it to yourselves……I find that heard to believe, especially for Keane

    Reply
  85. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Hey Ags! You missed all the fun today! LOL Not! I just came on to say hi to you, missed you at GD, so thought Id find you here! Love you!!! Have a good night xoxoxoxoxoxox

    Reply
  86. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    @Tamara:
    Tam…. I know , I know … picking up the crumbs LOL (still fun though)

    Reply
  87. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    Lots of stuff , little one, you don’t know….. :)

    Reply
  88. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    ….see, GD plays Major League,,,, no Little League….. but thanks for the info ….:)

    Reply
  89. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    LOL That is sooooooooo funny! So she finally came clean did she? About time too! LMAO

    Reply
  90. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Wow, you guys are really something else. So, i guess if you’re not in your “secret club” you are on the “little league” team. That really sounds pretentious. Nice talking to you Ms. A………….

    Reply
  91. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    @Tamara:
    …. should we tell the world who K Cat is ? … hahahaha…. these people are so naive …. hahaha…. no professionals , just a bunch of amateurs trying to impress a bunch of ‘ green’ housewives …. wonnabe cool chicks hahahahaha

    Reply
  92. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Gull Dangage Control, Watching. This crowd cannot help but crow when they have infol Vis a vis Patty Anne hot tailing it over to FF over KC. LMAO>

    Waiting patiently for Kate’s outrage and Keane’s lecture and Patty Anne’s shitty spelling

    Reply
  93. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    …nice try W&W…. just not working… try again…. :)

    Reply
  94. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Go ahead, I’d love to know. Who is KC????

    Reply
  95. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    Oh and for Tamara’s opinions copied and pasted off Storm Front.

    Reply
  96. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    KC has not outed and is not me. Lavonda was funny, not mean.

    Reply
  97. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    hahahahahahahaha…. a little house in the suburbs …… must be nice…. problem is: your brain is there too lol

    Reply
  98. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Ahhhhh Aggie, I wouldn’t say anything about KC until all the LOGD have jumped through the sacrificial ring of fire, swearing eternal loyalty to Gull Dang and sealing our pact of truth with blood and only then can we even begin to contemplate sharing our ancient wisdom with anyone outside our sacred inner circle! There could be dire circumstances if any of our top secret information were to get leaked into cyberspace, it might blow up the whole world wide web!!

    Reply
  99. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    @Tamara:
    Please don’t take Cracker personally as it was all meant in wicked fun.

    Reply
  100. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Whatever Ms. Agatha. You’re not as smart as you think.

    Reply
  101. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    @Tamara:
    At least you still have a sense of humour

    Reply
  102. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    hahaha… and you are dumber than I thought … hahaha , sorry .. cracking up too much I admit

    Reply
  103. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    @ W & W – Just kidding around you know! LOL It’s late and Im tired, getting punchy, so off to bed! Nite ladies and gents (if there are any here! ha!) “see” you all tomorrow! PS KC just loooooooooves ME! haha

    Reply
  104. Tamara said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Nitey Nite Ags! Be a good girl….xoxoxox

    Reply
  105. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    @Tamara:
    Tam..Oh…Tam…. you are so right LOL …. still, hard to contain oneself in the storm of lameness haha

    Reply
  106. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:55 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Do you mean the way we have the userlist at gulldang? hmmm. Someone works at blogger and someone knows someone there. No one guessed Lavonda but thank you for playing. You would be ADMAZED at what I know. Remember, in sales, it’s all about relationships and contacts. You have no privacy online. I thought I told everyone that. Oh yeah, it was just a conspiracy.

    Ian’s FB friends + contacts at blogger +ladeez of gull dang =pwned

    Ya’ll sure is some mean bitchez over at the gull. Esp what you did to Ladybert.

    Pip Pip Cherrio!

    Reply
  107. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Yup, you are cracking up. Just want to make a point that once again you prove the people on this board are bullies. Pull up one post where I was ever nasty to you or anyone else. That’s the way this board operates and that is why so many left. Even you would be hard pressed to disagree with that.

    Reply
  108. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    You are so right…… absolutely….no questions asked

    Reply
  109. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    I agree to anything you say, OK ? …. would that make you happy ? I want you to be 100 % happy and not go away from here without the feeling that everybody is 100% on your side….. whatever it takes !

    Reply
  110. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Yes, you should do that. Do it now, bluffer. C&P it. Bring it.

    Reply
  111. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    You don’t have to make me happy but thanks anyway. You don’t mean anything to me, you are one of many faceless people on the internet I converse with. I don’t rush to this site daily to find my “friends”.
    This is one of many sites i go to to read and give my take on things. I like celebrity gossip, that is why i originally came to this site a long time ago……….not so much now that it went down the toilet. Night, night, sleep tight Ms. A

    Reply
  112. Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Now you’re talkin bring it ladies, bring it all. Otherwise EAT the fact that you were beaten at your own stupid game.

    Reply
  113. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    …. you make me cyiiiiiiiing …….. I thought you loved me now…..how disappointing …. I will never get over it ! ROFLMBO

    Reply
  114. Ms Agatha said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    @Watching and Waiting:
    so he/she says before heading to school ……lol

    Reply
  115. Watching and Waiting said on October 2nd, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    mmmmm, I’m quite sure you won’t LOL
    I have the feeling this is not the first time you’ve been disappointed
    Again, sleep tight.

    Reply
  116. Meh said on October 3rd, 2009 at 12:04 am

    Angie was hot five years ago. Now she looks like a skeleton.

    Reply
  117. Alif said on October 3rd, 2009 at 2:59 am

    Angie and Brad have way too much sh—y baggage to be considered “hot” or “beautiful”.

    Remember when Oprah went overseas to open a school for desperate children and it caused an uproar over here? People were pissed that America has more than enough cases of needy children and not enough schools for them. It appeared to many people that Oprah was self-aggrandizing.
    Well, there are so many hungry and even starving children over here that the UN should send US some help!
    I s there an African woman who could take on the mission? She could pose with some waif on the streets of any US city and inform the world how our country doesn’t have time for its poor but sure as hell finds the time and monies to go across the world to police foreign countries.

    Maybe Ian hobnobbing with the evil Perez Hilton (I swear that guy has really evil eyes!) has him gravitating to the evil Brangie. Misery loves Company; Birds of a Feather Flock Together; The Apple Doesn’t Fall Far from the Tree, and a whole bunch of truisms apply here.

    Reply
  118. Alif said on October 3rd, 2009 at 3:06 am

    Megan Fox, who is still young and building up herself and career is BEING USED by the loonies to BUILD UP Angie.

    Reply
  119. Alif said on October 3rd, 2009 at 3:10 am

    Audrey Hepburn must be rolling over in her grave, so to speak, knowing she’s BEING USED by Angie, when she tells the world that she idolizes Audrey Hepburn!

    Reply
  120. jan/sa said on October 3rd, 2009 at 3:42 am

    alif: yes i do believe that the peewee tit and jolie should first help their own country but don’t you know they do not like the country of their birth and think france is much better than the old usa. as for the newest photo op is she trying to look like the holy madonna and peewee the pro photographer ? i am sorry but i believe that they bring negative pr to any cause they do and should just stay at home and look after their kids, because as soon as you see them on a photo op with the poor you switched off and say to yourself ” WHAT DO THESE TWO CHEATERS AND SELFCENTERED PRICKS KNOW ABOUT THE WORLD HE HAS A BRICK OF HASH IN HIS HOUSE AND SHE SLEPT WITH A MARRIED MAN” so they should really leave the goodwill work to people that we can hold up as role models not trailer trash. as for africa we love oprah for what she did but i am sure she is helping in the usa as well. but the usa can keep the jolie/tit we do not need them in africa. these two will only split when jen marries and becomes the new power couple because people will be more interested in jen marraige and be waiting for the first baby and want to hear all about her new life, then these two will not have her to pip the peoples interest and just become and old pensionable couple with 20 kids. old news jmo

    Reply
  121. Pattyanne said on October 3rd, 2009 at 8:41 am

    @Constant Gardener:
    Gull Dang Lavatory dawlin, ah hate ta dessipint yunz cuz weinz ull knowd how entellegint yuz thunk yunz air, bud i dunt reed hostile storen, jist angie jo nuez. See? yunz air lak fartz in de wind; yunz shoe duz stink bud it blows away. Tanks fer yur shoe yuz dun put on fer usen here Lavaroty.

    Reply
  122. Tamara said on October 3rd, 2009 at 8:59 am

    @Pattyanne:
    LOL So CG finally outed herself, it’s about time too, the shtick was getting old. I don’t know why she felt the need to hide behind Lavonda. She never had any problem saying what she wanted to say before. All this Lavonda crap just because she didn’t like an argument that ensued one night in defense of Toby Kat, I mean Bitsey. And truth be told, it wasn’t even Keane that was pursuing the argument, it had to do with differing opinions between Toby and Different Guest if I recall correctly something about adopting a child of another race. So Lavonda, is there some reason you couldn’t come on as yourself and duel it out with the person you had a beef with? I don’t recall you having problems with anyone else, why take it out on the whole board? I remember having some really great conversations with you, and I know Ian really liked you too. I always considered you intelligent and interesting, and the Lavonda thing was just so far beneath you . It just seems so childish to me.

    Reply
  123. Tamara said on October 3rd, 2009 at 9:25 am

    @Constant Gardener:
    CG – just to set the record straight once and for all, we didn’t do anything to LadyBert! I for one just loved her to death. We did not kick her to the curb, she sent me an email and asked to be removed because she felt the board was too similar to FF…!!! I didn’t want to let her go, and neither did anyone else, we were surprised but respectful, until she then joined FF, which happened to be the very reason she wanted out of Gull Dang!! So, don’t blame us for that, I loved Lady and I hated to see her go but I respected her request and removed her. That is all! Ask Lady and she will tell you the exact same thing. We DID NOT DO ANYTHING TO LADY!!! So stick that in your corn cob pipe and smoke it.

    Reply
  124. Tamara said on October 3rd, 2009 at 9:38 am

    @Ladybert – you know that I have never ever crossed the line with you, I have never shared any of your private information, nor have I ever tried to contact you after you asked to be removed from Gull Dang. Please set this record straight for your new friends at FF and tell them you requested to be removed because the board was too much like FF – we did not kick you out, we did not want you to go, it was purely your choice and your choice only!! I am so tired of hearing what bullies we GD ladies are, how mean we were to you, and you don’t defend us even thought you know very well that is not what happened! Please set the record straight here and lets move on. I know you will do the right thing Lady! Thank you! xoxo

    Reply
  125. ladybert62 said on October 3rd, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    OK – thanks for you input! :D

    Reply
  126. ladybert62 said on October 3rd, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    @Tamara:
    I havent read all the posts here so am not sure what the fuss is about – I left gull dang on my own volition.

    Reply
  127. ladybert62 said on October 3rd, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    Cant we just stick to discussing the topics presented by Ian – why all the personal attacks?

    Reply
  128. Angie's Stan said on October 3rd, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    Thank you Ian . Angelina is so beautiful. It’s amount time you came around. I knew you were a undercover fan and were intrigued by Angelina. I hope we can get more positive updates . If so, expect for more traffic increase. Please post more pics of her and her beautiful family. I enjoyed your in depth reporting a while back on Angelina. I’m also enjoying your other stories. I think Angelina has a beautiful face and hair. She’s quite striking and I think her kids and Brad Pitt are all very beautiful.

    Reply
  129. Tamara said on October 3rd, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I think the reason he has his name tatooed is so he won’t forget his name since Madonna calls him “Boy” haha!

    Reply
  130. Vittoria said on October 4th, 2009 at 9:28 am

    @ladybert62:

    Constant Gardener said on October 2nd, 2009 at 9:55 pm
    @Ms Agatha:
    Do you mean the way we have the userlist at gulldang? hmmm. Someone works at blogger and someone knows someone there. No one guessed Lavonda but thank you for playing. You would be ADMAZED at what I know. Remember, in sales, it’s all about relationships and contacts. You have no privacy online. I thought I told everyone that. Oh yeah, it was just a conspiracy.

    Ian’s FB friends + contacts at blogger +ladeez of gull dang =pwned

    Ya’ll sure is some mean bitchez over at the gull. Esp what you did to Ladybert.

    Do you see that LB? They continue to insist we did horrible things to you. CG also says we were horrible to her when she was at IUC. The archives show that to be complete rubbish. No one was EVER mean to CG.

    Reply
  131. Sexy Starlets said on October 4th, 2009 at 11:48 am

    A stylish addition to any wardrobe, and practical enough to be a part of your everyday life. Sexy Starlets

    Reply
  132. d said on October 5th, 2009 at 7:21 am

    Wow – you miss a lot of crap on here when you’re sick !! I thought Lavanda and Bitsy were funny…and i always thought Constant gardner and TobyKat were insightful posters….so y’all can call yourselves whatever you want. And Keane’s Cat…..loved him/her ! Sorry – but i did….there i said it. Didn’t always agree with their postings but more fun to read than long winded rants

    Reply
  133. mrsmclovin said on October 5th, 2009 at 7:59 am

    I thought Lavonda and Bitsy were funny – as was Keane’s cat…..didn’t always agree with them, but this is a “discussion panel” so be it…

    Reply
  134. Tamara said on October 6th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    @d:
    Hey D – At first I thought Keanes Cat was rather clever too, but she got really really vicious and then I didn’t think it was so funny anymore. I think it might have been easier for you to think she was funny because you weren’t the target. But hey, its all behind us now. Constant Gardner, Toby and KC are all happily ensconed at FF so everyone’s happy! LOL

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

October 2009
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Meta