Angelina Says She Won’t Work Again With Brad Because Of Kids

Posted on September 29th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment

brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-at-2009-oscarsAngie Jolie has dispelled any rumors about a silver screen reunion with her beau Brad. Don’t look for a Smith sequal or any other projects involving both members of the golden couple. (More Here)

  1. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:13 am

    Educate them? she can start with school.

    Reply
  2. Alif said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:33 am

    What Angelina SAYS, and what Angelina DOES, are frequently two different things. Thought everybody but the loonies knew this by now.

    But then, I don’t watch any of their movies; although I’m interested in the one she made with Matt Damon because of the great reviews he got, and because Keir Dullea is in it.

    Reply
  3. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:39 am

    I saw that one, she over acted in it I thought, horribly. I thought she did well in Beyond Borders and the movie was not all that successful.

    Reply
  4. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:46 am

    BTW she made this statement awhile back so she must be putting it back out there for a reason, any guesses considering most people ( around the couple) say they are not together as a couple and are just co- parenting at this point?

    This is what I believe anyway.

    Reply
  5. synrqhzxjk said on September 29th, 2009 at 5:12 am

    e4u3iP fovqoecnezdz, [url=http://zeoiikspufay.com/]zeoiikspufay[/url], [link=http://wvqmdjogxzbd.com/]wvqmdjogxzbd[/link], http://ifmzolofobwi.com/

    Reply
  6. too curious said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:44 am

    Yeah, right, AJ and BP always put their children first before their careers, vices, etc.

    Reply
  7. too curious said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:46 am

    Is it just me, or do AJ and BP do their best acting EVER when they speak about their happy, happy family? And current performances of that production are getting worse and worse…

    Reply
  8. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:37 am

    I guess her statement about not working together so they can raise the six kids must translate into, “Brad or I must be available to supervise the army of nannies we employ”….yup, that’s more like it imo. As to them being referred to as “the Golden Couple”, that’s funny, isn’t that what blond Brad, and blond Jennifer were called in HW before Dark Angie Jo came between them? Even Brad is dark now, as he continues his pattern of morphing into the “woman of the moment” ’s appearance…..Karma Brad

    Reply
  9. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:39 am

    Appears to me that what Angie Jo is saying translates into, “One of us must be home with the army of nannies to supervise their work”, it’s clear that neither one of them has formed familiarity with each child independentely , one can see that in the photo op shoots. Z leans back from Brad rather than forward, Shiloh is always leaning away from Angie Jo, only Maddox appears confident in his place in their family. Sad group of small and big people sharing a single roof…not a family imo. The older they get the more obvious it becomes to the public. MAMS sucked anyway, only the rabid Jolie fans would pay money to see a sequel of that bomb. Seems this toxic coupling is destroying them both bit by bit. Angie was much admired, enjoyed, etc., as the free spirit, crazy, wild woman who adopted Maddox and wore blood vial around her neck, but her pairing with Brad Pitt did not accomplish what she thought it would, it did not rise her above her status in HW, rather, it made them both laughing stocks, and losers…KARMA is a biotch

    Reply
  10. keane cyber queen supreme said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Ian, why are you posting on this obscure story based on Jolie’s latest PR release? As if anyone cares whether they ever act together again anyway, the only thing people want to know about is their private life. And why are you referring to Brad as Ange’s “beau” and the pair of them as the “golden couple” when you’ve been telling us they’ve been split for the last year? Whose hymn book are you singing from these days?

    Reply
  11. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    There have been many commenting on why are the kids not in school, and if I remember one of Mickeys friends said that Brad spends alot of time at home on the computer surfing the blogs and message boards to see what public opinion is, despite his denial of this, and then adjust accordingly. That was why we suddenly saw Angelina carrying Shiloh more at one point. It also makes her sound pro education , which she is, and that they are still a couple, which imo , they are not.

    Reply
  12. Different Guest said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Kate:Given that Pax is old enough for kindergarten and France pays for preschool, I’m surprised we haven’t had a pap shot of all the kids off to school.

    Reply
  13. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    Reading these stories about Brangelina makes them seem more like Milk Toast to me lately. Yano, they are becoming very boring. He looks at least 65 y/o, and not the least bit romantic lead type, she looks like a druggi either high or on her last leg, and the kids eventually going to become noticable to the laws of their “homestead” country which will enforce their child endangerment laws i’m sure. Lack of stability, lack of proper education, and why is Shiloh always bruised, missing teeth too soon? Good coverup attempt, sure she’s a “tomboy”…not that Z beats the crap out of her perhaps?
    Same old, same old discussions for over four years now, nothing new, nothing explosive. I knew an old timer once who called it as he saw it, great old guy, long gone now, but i loved his favorite phrase, “Like a fart in the wind, stinks awhile, then it’s gone”….yup Old Feller, that’s Brangelina…..Boringgggggggggg.

    Reply
  14. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I wonder if her speaks well enough for public school, although he probably could pick up French easier than any of the children, there are many French speaking children from his birth country. Maddox is suppose to speak it the best, so you would think that at least the three older ones would be in school, a private one at least. They say they want them to have a normal life, and that seems to be the message they are sending by these photos opps they are doing (they all look like they just crawled out of a card board box somewhere, which I think is insulting to people who are trying to survive when they then go back to their 60 million dollar Chateau) which can only be taken in France with their permission, or the children’s faces would be blotted out, and they are not. They obviously are trying to counter the latest In Touch story that Brad has moved out. He could smile and had like he cared a little bit, instead of scowling at her as they leave the store, that would help. samcc! Maybe they hope this crap deters from-

    Where in the world are the twins? and I mean THE WORLD? ha ha! or maybe I should say, whose in the world are the twins? ha ha ha!!!

    Reply
  15. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    The Elephant in the Room…:) Hey sweets, how are you?

    Reply
  16. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Have to agree PA, but you know,as we all do, they always have a plan,something is always brewing, I am sure their PR people are working overtime these days. Brad said he is more free than he has ever been, I rather doubt that, he looks like a trapped man, like a rat in cage that is forced back on the treadmill just as he thinks he is about to be let out of the cage, he is placed back on it for another exhausting run.jmho:)

    Reply
  17. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    @Kate:
    I read somewhere recently, that Angie has never stopped her affair with Jenny Shimizu the entire time she’s been with Brad…i’d love to know more about that, and i’m sure it’s out there somewhere on the net…

    Reply
  18. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    I love historical movies, the old type of Big Epic! , so, i went to see Alexander. How i wish i’d asked for my money back. Angie ruined it. Collin Farrel was gorgeous, and terrific actor in it, but Angie Jo was using the same “Changeling” accent, yano, her one one and only accent? Garboesk? I was laughing so hard during her scenes, i forgot the movie wasn’t a comedy. And the scene where her son, Collin, rapes her was a joke! He was into the scene, but she was like a limp dishrag, and trying to scream in her horrible accent. What a waste of money and time .@Alif:

    Reply
  19. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on September 29th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @Kate:

    Key Kate I’m ok thanks apart from the major ethical issues issue! How about you, any better? Yes well if I wanted to read about Angelina’s latest press releases I could go to any other magazine, newspaper or gossip blog – there’s no need to repeat it here! And as for their PR reflecting the opinions expressed on gossip blogs it is amazing to see how faithfully they respond to it now. Her sudden switch to dowdy dress, no make-up and cap-wearing on her UN publicity opps after the criticism of her ridiculously high-glamour, artily shot previous efforts was hilarious to watch! It’s like the gossip bloggers of the world have the power to control her behaviour. Perhaps we should throw a few red herrings in just to see if she will do it. Like hey Angie looks like she has no rhythm, we would see her burst into spontaneous body-popping/break-dancing moves when out for a photo opp at the store don’t cha think? Or, hm Angie has been rocking the long black hair look for a while now, it is so old and Megan Fox is doing it way better, I wonder if she had considered a multi-coloured mohwak to match Maddox? That would just be so much edgier than her edgier-than-thou young pretender. Let’s see if we can make this puppet dance! Lol

    Reply
  20. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I find it interesting that Perez gets so many hits, makes so much money, off of nothing, never reports anything, just comments on news, that is it, makes his opinon noted, or makes fun of someone, draws sperm or private parts all over people, but never really dishes any gossip to speak of, none. Ted does at times, and EL does at times. That is the reason I was never drawn to any of those blogs, at all, so I understand what you mean. I think IAN is probably (guessing IDK) mandatory gag from the publisher of the book since it comes out soon. Looks like the angle was changed a bit the title, so it will be interesting to see what he decided to do with it. It is about the same length as the MJ book, but the write up no longer mentions they are married. That was a major point of controversary, and it does not mention the adoptions or the twins, or anything about a Great Deception, which I think is what most people are interested in. I think everyone knows he cheated and it started long before the split, and that it was while she was still laying next to Jen. Everyone knows that Brange has a volatile relationship and those who have their eyes open know she still sleep with women, so not sure if any of that will be so mindblowing to many. Just a thought. I hope that IAN has not watered it down like the book on Tom Cruise was. It will only take one person to buy it and read it and reveal what is in it, and that will determine the sales, so I am sure he is holding it close to his chest at this point. What do you think?

    I would buy it regardless because IAN always reveals things in his writing that the press does not, and it amuses me that people do not ever catch on to that, and I like the way he covers the person in biography style, including himself,, it is funny at times, and makes me laugh. Laughing is good for me right now. :)

    Reply
  21. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    BTW – I think they don’t put the kids in school because they can’t control what they would say to other kids and what the kids would say to their parents. If they are being raised primarily by nannies and mommy and daddy haven’t been together for a year then that would be round the school yard in seconds. That’s why they keep them “home schooled” in my humble opinion! We’ll just have to wait for the kids to write the tell-all a la McKenzie Phillips unfortunately. What a sad state of affairs.

    Reply
  22. Alif said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    I saw the news about their getaway mansion in France. Gave it a glance instead of checking it more carefully. Only later on did it intrigue me enough to regret my oversight.

    Would love to read more details. What I got was that AJ has a pilot’s license. And it is a huge area bought for their private comings and goings.
    When it sunk in, I realized that this was ideal for the bi couple. The paps couldn’t photograph them. The nannies are not going to talk.
    They could invite some highly trusted celebs to their parties without their public’s knowledge. The whole can of worms!
    BUT! What about terrorists? They could sabotage the plane, the mansion. They could kidnap the kids. Brangie would have to hire an army for security purposes. JMO!

    Reply
  23. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Was just thinking about this on GD and thought I would repeat it here as it is relevant to her current PR game:

    What I find hilarious about AJ’s “humanitarian” efforts is that she is clearly acting trying to be concerned, kind and genuine at every single one of them. She does this kind of concerned but warm smile thing which she thinks makes her look sincere and saintly. She does it in interviews as well, it is hysterical. Apparently she always carries the kids in photo opps because she think it makes her look “likable”. Bless her, she really is quite thick isn’t she? Whose thought processes are as basic as this!

    Reply
  24. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    @Kate:

    I think Perez just gets hit because he is the only blogger who is widely known about. About 6 years ago he was the only one I knew and even that was quite vague. I think the gossip blog phenomena has only grown in recent years and he has just had more longevity and better marketing. People don’t have time to trawl through internet sites I guess. They just read which ever one is most well-known/accessible I think.

    Reply
  25. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    As to Perez Hilton’s blog site, i read there maybe two times and left with a bad taste in my mouth. IMO that man is sick~! He scribbles in white all over his celeb photos penis’ , puzzy’s, anything goes with his site. He is not just disrespectful, but crude and ignorant. Oh yes , and i never found anything “new” on his site, he seems to use it for personal reasons, aside from income.

    Reply
  26. Ms Agatha said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Exactly. And if Ian thinks he can repeat Perez success by copying his style of ‘no news ‘ , but by just commenting on already reported stuff, Ian is wrong …. and I am afraid he will find out sooner or later.

    Reply
  27. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    A few of us were discussing the possibility of Brad building an airstrip at Chateau Miraval, and one blogger who is a French citizen stated it would be impossible. A helo pad yes, airstrip? no. Probably more spoon fed lies to make them sound like “Adventurous , Dynamic Duo”..lol. With Angie JO, it’s all for appearances, she needs admiration and love. With Brad? He’s so over with, i really don’t care if he buys a hot air balloon to travel about in. Good poing Alif, about security. I had read Brad paid out nearly one million dollars to update the security around Chateau Miraval, including an extremely tall security fence the entire encapsulating property….how is that possible i ask? More B.S. pr. I pity those kids, and now that i’ve seen close up photos of Shiloh taken over the past three years, i’m also thinking that her parent’s comment that she is a “tomboy” is more to cover up all her bruises, and broken/missing teeth. At 3, they do NOT fall out naturally!@Alif:

    Reply
  28. Ms Agatha said on September 29th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    lol…it’s all about the money…lol…. he got lucky… he was the first and even his star is sinking…. people are more savvy now than before…. and they expect more from blog sites ….the time for easy money is no more…

    Reply
  29. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    So true Aggie~! As in all things, once it become a joke of it’s former self, it soon is abandoned and fades into obscurity. Truly a shame too, imo, when just five months ago this was a very exciting, informative, and fun blog site. Hopefully IAN will bring it back to it’s former glory, with real stories, with real expose’s. Used to be i couldn’t wait to be able to go online and come to this blog to see what the REAL stories were, play with the puzzles. I think we all have great memories of those fun times.@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  30. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    I remember years, and years ago, there was a HW reporter, rather caustic voice, but she told it like it was, details, all of it. She eventually published a monthly magazine, and i never missed a copy! We need more like her….i remembered finally…Rona Barrett@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  31. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Very funny Keane. Reminded me of her “Madonna and Child” pose recently in Samalia. Made me want to gag . I think everyone recognized that photo being for her purposes not for the refugees.@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  32. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on September 29th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    To be fair to Ian I think like Kate says he is probably under an embargo at the moment under the orders of his publishers. I think it is pretty unlikely that someone would put out the kind of stories Ian was putting out at the beginning of the year then reosrt to this type of stuff later in the game unless there was a reason for it. If you notice none of the Brange stuff in the last few months has been original, just a link to a story elsewhere – makes me think Ian can’t publish stories from his sources at the mo. Either way, just becoming like any of the many other bloggers who merely regurgitate PR stories and the same old tabloid stuff is never going to make Ian much money so if that were his motivation I would suggest a speedy rethink! But like you I could do without the repetitions of the sycophantic epithets – there is nothing golden about Brange – rotten maybe, golden no!

    Reply
  33. Ms Agatha said on September 29th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Hope you are right regarding him being under orders of his publishers…. because don’t want even to think about the consequences if it weren’t so…..

    Reply
  34. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    Didn’t he face that once before? And he informed his posters that he was in order to explain why the information was rather handed down from other sites? Why couldn’t IAN say to us, “Sorry, i’m not at liberty to discuss this at this time”@Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Reply
  35. mslewis said on September 29th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    @Kate: The children’s faces would only be blotted out in Europe, not in the U.S. Even though the pics are taken in France, if they are published there, the children’s faces would be erased.

    Reply
  36. mslewis said on September 29th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme: You do know that only Maddox and Pax are old enough for school, don’t you?? The other kids are 4, 3 and 15 months. That’s not school age in any country!! The kids are probably being home schooled but, even if they aren’t, what business is it of yours? Even if they are totally illiterate, what business is that of you people? It has nothing to do with any of you silly people!!

    If you don’t see Brad and Angelina for a long period of time, you insist they have broken up; when they do go out with their kids you insist it’s a “photo op”; when you see the kids you insist they look “sad.” What exactly do you people want? You don’t criticize Jennifer Garner when she takes her girls out for a walk; you don’t criticize Hugh Jackman when he’s out with his kids all the time. Is it just because you hate Jolie and Pitt so much?

    You people are so sad and pathetic. It’s a pleasure to come here and read your vitriol!! I love it. Ian has totally abandoned you and yet you still come here and vent. Of course Ian is being soft on Brad and Angelina now because he realizes that all the stuff he was saying previously was a totally LIE and he was caught up in it, probably threathen with a lawsuit and had to curb his tongue because he had zero backup to the lies he was telling. And, get this people THERE WILL BE NO BOOK about Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie written by Ian Halperin!!! I know in your silly little hearts you realize this but just so you know for sure THERE WILL BE NO BOOK!!! Sorry to burst your bubble!! FOOLS!!!

    Reply
  37. mslewis said on September 29th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    @Pattyanne: Of course no private citizen can build an airstrip on their property in France!! How could they go through customs? Only a fool would believe they would. And, yes, they have built a fence around their chateau, along with loads of remodeling of the entire place, since they own it now. Brad has spent somewhere around $25 million on updates to the buildings. That’s a fact, from his lips. But then, you only read the ragmags so you might have missed that.

    Reply
  38. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Truly. What’s up with that?

    Reply
  39. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @Kate:
    Hey Kate! They live on Uranus!!!!!

    Reply
  40. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    @Pattyanne:
    Hey Patty Anne – maybe less 0ld feller and more like Old Yeller!

    Reply
  41. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    see her burst into spontaneous body-popping/break-dancing moves when out for a photo opp at the store don’t cha think?
    Damn that’s the funniest visual I’ve had lately. You are just too funny. Thanks I needed that.

    Reply
  42. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    @mslewis:
    In the US – pre-K is MANDATED at the age of 4.

    Reply
  43. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    @mslewis:
    No actually, I did not know that, thanks. Are you sure, because we haven’t seen any twins in the last few months, have you? I think both Mad and Pax can go to school, Zahara is old enough for kinegarden,they had Shiloh is preschool according to the PR team during the shooting of Salt, so..all four were old enough during that PR blitz, but not now? Is that what you mean?

    samcc..please don’t respond.

    Reply
  44. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    @Vittoria:
    lol hey Vic, I do not normally respond to Ms Lewis because she only comes around to harass, never has a comment unless one of us is on the board, but I thought I would make her day a little more exciting today.

    lol

    Reply
  45. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @mslewis:
    hmmmm, I think I will let all of you just keep on keep one keep on thinking that. That is more fun.

    Reply
  46. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    Easy there dawlin! You’re gonna blow a blood vessel. It’s chat, not life and death. :-) Oh, and BTW, in the U.S. we have what is called “Pre School”…children aged 3 and up to kindergarten age can attend. Also another program in the U.S. called Head Start for pre-kindergarten disadvantaged children. Both are very good programs imo. We are living in the age of technology and it’s important to educate our children.
    :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preschool_education
    @mslewis:

    Reply
  47. Pattyanne said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    Thank you for substantiating , we all know Brad Pitt is a habitual liar, but it’s nice to have someone enter the room and state they also recognize him to be such. We all knew that Angie Jo goes to France with one, two, or three, never five of her kids for her monthly pick-up, so why bother with an airfield? Thanks for your take!! Very astute.@mslewis:

    Reply
  48. jeannie said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    @Vittoria:
    Since when? NO it is not. Kindergarten is mandatory but pre-school is just highly recoommended. You cannot prosecute parents for not putting a 4 year old in preschool. It costs money, dear.

    Reply
  49. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

    @jeannie:
    I think in the context of Brange, (is what she meant) they can afford it, and they did have her in preshcool in Long Island.

    Reply
  50. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    @Bitty:
    Sweetie, you are wasting your time, you can rant and rave your vile all day long and all nite long, and this will be my first and last post to you, I simply do not care. Have fun, and have at it! go for it, have a ball, knock yourself out , freedom of speech, 1st Amendment Rights, and all! lol Maybe some of your friends will come play with you, I won’t.

    Reply
  51. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:00 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate – thanks for telling me. I haven’t been around much lately and I guess she just wasn’t memorable enough to remember. Of course, when last I was here, it was war, war war, all the time. You would think Bush and Cheney were running the place.

    Reply
  52. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    @jeannie:
    I cannot imagine wanting your child to be behind all the others. The state will help pay for it too if you don’t have the money. I think those two shold be able to come up with the money. Maybe they could use a little of that photo money if things are so tight.

    Reply
  53. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    @Vittoria:
    You are welcome lovely lady, she is not. She only comes on here to harass one of us, she is a diehard fan of the Brange, which I have no problem with, so is Liz E, who is respectful , she states her case, which I respect, become her reason for doing so is to educate,from her point of view, as we all do, but I respect that. We can not all agree all the time.

    Reply
  54. Vittoria said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    @Kate:
    I’m with you there. I can agree to disagree. Some of them are just the tiniest bit rude though. Like some shreaking fishwives. Whatever. Carry on 1st amendment chick!

    Reply
  55. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:57 pm

    @Vittoria:
    lol yes why not, I can easily just chat around the filth . I am really getting immuned to it at this point! I just don’t honestly care anymore what they have to say, considering the source here of course.

    Reply
  56. Ms Agatha said on September 29th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    She won’t work with him anymore because they have split and are co-parenting ….. if one works , the other one has the kids … more like forced parenting to me lol …. where would they park all the kids while on set together ? With Clooney the mannanny ? LOL

    Reply
  57. Ms Agatha said on September 29th, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    These people will entertain us for years to come …. we will always will see them with the kids , in various variants , different countries, different partners , few years from now the kids will be movie stars , musicians, druggies, we see them going in and out of bars, rehab, having kids of their own….. and so on and so on…the never ending story …

    Reply
  58. Kate said on September 29th, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    lol that is just way too obvious Aggie, listen it would not surprise me at all for her to adopt another child and as Alif said, Brad to stay right there, in his side of the Chateau and go on with his own life. Must be a miserable way to live, but any parent that has been faced with choosing their freedom and happiness over being with their children fulltime can identify with that. (thankfully I never had to) but I so understand how hard that would be. I can not see him doing that long term though, unless he choose to never committ again to anyone and just live a very free life like George Clooney as a bachelor. Maybe that is what he wants to do. Still, it must be exhausting to have to pretend all the time. Life is much too short.I have to say those, those kids are just so adorable, I think I might sacrafice my life for them if they were mine, I would my own rather than give them up. I just can not imagine not having my kids with me when they were growing up everyday. They just have such a innocence.

    Nite everyone, tired tonight. xx

    Reply
  59. Alif said on September 30th, 2009 at 1:49 am

    Speaking of children, I see some are featured on tv who are already reading, and they’re 7 months old, or around that age.
    And they are white, black and asian.

    Not too long ago, I was in a busy store. There was a mother busily checking things out. All of a sudden her adolescent daughter exclaimed, “I don’t like that man, mommy!” She was referring to a complete stranger who passed her way.

    Well, as long as I’m telling anecdotes about kids, I’ll add this one: Years ago, I was on a bus going from Seattle, Washington to Vancouver, B.C. The rules for the ride were very strict then.
    All of a sudden, from the back of the bus, a little girl’s voice piped up: “GRAMMA, ARE YOU DYIN’ FOR A CIGARETTE?”

    Reply
  60. Togi said on September 30th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    @Alif:
    BAAAHAA HAAAAA! Encore, Alife. ENCORE!

    Reply
  61. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on September 30th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    @Kate:

    I disagree with you there Kate. While mslewis is undoubtedly a loon of long-standing – she has been commenting on dlisted and justjared for years – Liz E. is I think a professional PR lady. Loons/fans are mental and sttupid, they have to be to buy the BS. Liz E. is considered and presents the most reasonable-sounding argument she can considering the very difficult to defend behaviour of the Brange. It is practised and studied. And she would clearly defend them – Angelina primarily of course – to the death. That’s not a loon, that’s a staff member.

    Reply
  62. mslewis said on September 30th, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme: So, I am “mental” and “stupid” and you, who believes the tabloids, are brilliant and always right??? You are too idiotic to realize how ridiculous you sound and how often you people contradict yourselves. But, whatever!! Keep on believing what you have believed for these past five years and I’ll keep on “harrassing” you!!!

    Reply
  63. Ms Agatha said on September 30th, 2009 at 9:00 pm

    To get rid of a total mental retardation is stupid….wow so much blind adulation ! LOL

    Reply
  64. Kate said on September 30th, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    LOL that is sort of what I said…:) mslewis comes hear to bash us , is a brange diehard fan, Liz E is a fan of Brange, but she respectful always, close -yes?

    Reply
  65. Kate said on September 30th, 2009 at 10:19 pm

    @mslewis:
    I would not say mental and stupid, I thought your comments about John Travolta were very spot on and kind, but I really do not understand why you choose to harass people on a board that are obviously not pro Brange, what is the point? I would not waste my time going to Just Jared and trying to convince any of them that what they are buying into does not exist, based on my opinion. Of course everyone has one, we can agree to disagree, I don’t believe that Brad and Angie are any longer the couple they once were, so it just stumps me why someone would waste their time on a blog where everyone on it feels that way. It seems rather childish to come here with the sole intent to just harass. jmo

    Reply
  66. Ms Agatha said on September 30th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    @Kate:
    …as I said in above post….. she is full of adoration for us …just can’t stay away LOL

    Reply
  67. Alif said on October 1st, 2009 at 2:40 am

    @Togi:
    Sorry that’s all I can remember for now. I bet teachers have a lot of gems re: their students.

    You-Tube has “Kids Say the Darndest Things”. And just about any funny gal or fella one could remember.

    This is a funny an older friend told me back in the day. He said he had watched an old show, and there was a talk show host. I don’t remember who he said the host was. But it wasn’t Johnny Carson. Anyway, he said a voluptuous blonde actress was the guest. She wore a dress with a plunging neckline.
    Host: “That’s a beautiful dress you have on”
    Actress: (Coyly) “Thank You, it’s just something I threw on!”
    Host: “Well, you almost missed!”

    Reply
  68. Alif said on October 1st, 2009 at 3:35 am

    OT, but I read that Matt LeBlanc, Joey, on “Friends” has just landed a new series. I was one of the ones who felt sorry for him. Now he’s forged ahead of some of his former co-stars. Hope he does well.
    Matthew Perry i s working on a new movie; and just keeps honing his craft with his new projects.

    Back to you know what!
    Also read that AJ is demanding that JA stop texting BP. How does she know JA does? And why is she threatened, if so? Can’t see JA and BP reuniting. Too much water under the proverbial bridge. JA should let go. Who knows, but maybe she already has! And it’s another publicity ploy from AJ. jmo!
    And what about the std’s BP is reported to have? And the B.O? Just askin”!

    As a co-worker once announced in a loud voice as he came to work: TRUE LOVE MAY BE TEMPORARY, BUT HERPES LASTS FOREVER!

    Reply
  69. Samoys said on October 3rd, 2009 at 8:51 am

    lot about you

    Reply
  70. Roberto said on October 4th, 2009 at 3:43 am

    cool blog

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Meta