IUC Wednesday: Megan Fox Wants To Get Angelina in The Sack; Cirque Saga Continues, Book Flying Off The Shelves

Posted on June 17th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

- Angie Jolie has a new stalker – none other than Transformers hottie Megan Fox who www.contactmusic.com reports is hot in pursuit of hooking up with the worse half of Brangie.  What a hot couple this would be – AngieFox!  For more (Read This)

- Note to Cirque du Soleil – you may call my book “gossip” but I stand by every word in the book.  FYI, I’m a New York Times bestselling author whose work has appeared in numerous leading publications in the world.  The New Yorker once called my work “a judicious presentation of explosive material” and in 2002 The London Daily Mail named my undercover models tome book of the year (thank you Jackie Collins).  I’ll make a major announcement shortly regarding the whole Cirque affair.  For now, read today’s article in the Toronto Star.

  1. mooki said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:56 am

    and this was a girl who whined to reporters about not comparing her to Angie.

    btw, has anybody seen the Today Show altercation between Spencer Pratt/Heidi Montag (the fake married couple on The Hills) and Al Roker? Why is MTV still paying lip service to these two a-holes?

    Reply
  2. Cirque de Jolie said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:57 am

    …yeah, and I bet you totally went to Oxford too dude.

    Reply
  3. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:18 am

    AJ ’s mini me …… if she could pull that off … BP would be back !

    Reply
  4. Gitano said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:22 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    So true, Ms. Agatha, so sadly true. Brad has a penchant for threesomes; pairing the older with the younger.

    Reply
  5. Constant Gardner said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:25 am

    From the article:

    I love Angelina Jolie. She’s someone I admire and look up to. She’s my favourite actress in Hollywood. I just love that she’s incredibly honest, and I feel that she’s not afraid to be herself. She tells you exactly what’s on her mind.”

    omg excuse me while I get sick.

    Reply
  6. Constant Gardner said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:37 am

    In other “celeb” news, Twitter users hate Speidi (this is hilarious)

    http://jezebel.com/5293010/twitter-users-hate-heidi-and-spencer/gallery/

    Reply
  7. mooki said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:45 am

    http://forums.whyweprotest.net/291-scientology-discussion/mike-edwards-joins-implant-station-sky-47585/#post900625
    in more $cientology suspicious death news: Priscilla Presley’s ex Mike Edwards has just died. Hmmm, methinks she had a role in this…

    Reply
  8. Constant Gardner said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:07 am

    @mooki:
    Whoa all kinds of death and weirdness today! Mia Farrow’s brother found dead in art gallery, death is being called suspicious.

    Reply
  9. d said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:15 am

    god pat yourself on the back much Ian

    Reply
  10. mia said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:15 am

    Ah Ian! So you are a New York Time bestselling author? I tell you why: because you always jump on the most talked and more important most controversial talked about topic available! Just like with Kurt Cubain who was the icon of his generation and whose sudden death made major headlines around the world! No wonder your murder theory (that not you but a private investigator hired by his widdow came up with by the way!) attracted lots f potential readers! Fact is you lead the most parasitical lifestyle imaginable profiting from the name and achievements of famous people!
    And back to the Cirque Du Soleil stuff. What exactly did you expect from Guy Liberte? That he applauds your efforts to ruin his image and career? As far as I know he hasn`t asked you to write the book so what the f.uck are you angry about? What would you do if someone talked to YOUR ex partner behind your back and released a book including her rants about you? Would that make you happy? You act like a spoilt kindergarden kid that hits one of his playmates and calls his mother a w.hore (not knowing what that means ) and then when the other kid gets angry and hits back you run away sreaming how everyone is so mean to you!

    Reply
  11. cor_blimey said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    This is hardly exclusive news. It was in todays Metro (a free newspaper in the UK) and I think this has been taken out of context, she is hardly stalking Angelina.

    Reply
  12. cor_blimey said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:27 am

    Hardly as in NOT stalking her! Excuse my basic English!

    Reply
  13. OMG said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:37 am

    Careful Megan, i can sense you becoming the new target of hate when the crazies get fed up with AJ.

    Reply
  14. cor-blimey said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:38 am

    See my posts go missing again!

    Reply
  15. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:40 am

    Uh gross, Megan Fox is in the UK at the mo and was talking about her tatts at the premiere of whatever flick she’s promoting right now like some desperate Angelina wannabe. She looks like she’s had more plastic surgery than Angelina and is about as old. What a desperate pair they would be, competing with each other to be more dark, sexy, outrageous and spiritual. Barf.

    Reply
  16. Cirque de Jolie said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:40 am

    Moi aussi, Cor!

    Reply
  17. cor-blimey said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:43 am

    Yes she has been in the London Papers (Lite, Metro etc) as she has been promoting transformers.
    I sgree with OMG – Looks like the next hate figure is here!

    Reply
  18. meg said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:51 am

    Megan, stop telling stupidity only to make people talk about you!
    You just have to make good movies and be a good actress!

    Reply
  19. Cirque de Jolie said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    Yeah, how DARE she give interviews, say stuff, have tattoos and a permissive lifestyle, etc.

    Reply
  20. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:12 am

    Hi All – the pictures that I have seen recently of Ms. Fox – she looke different somehow. Is it just the hair that has changed or did she have plastic surgery done since the picture attached to this article? Also, I read somewhere that she started out life as a male – is this correct? Just curious as I know very little about here. Thanks. :P

    Reply
  21. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    So this is Keane, the same as the previous Keane? There have been so many lately I cant tell – but the language seems to be the old Keane! :D

    Reply
  22. meg said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    this charming megan said this about angie a montn before:
    http://angelinajoliesite.blogspot.com/2009/05/megan-fox-scare-of-angelina-jolie.html

    She should just keep her mouth closed.

    Reply
  23. mooki said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    how is it that all of People Mag’s “top 10 Hottest Bachelors” are rumored to be gay/bi?:
    -Chace Crawford
    -Shia LaBeouf
    -Adam Lambert (well, he’s openly gay)
    -Ryan Eggold
    -Kellan Lutz
    -Dwayne Johnson
    -Brody Jenner
    -Common
    -Taylor Kitsch
    -Robert Pattinson

    Reply
  24. I'm on the bidet said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Fox just makes sapphic statements for publicity – a while back she was saying that actress Olivia Wilde is hot. And I find it hard to believe that Laliberte is really all that upset about the sexual antics that Ian alleges in the book being public. For guys who sleep around a lot, the only thing as good as or better than the sex is talking about the sex, because then everyone knows what a big manly stud you are. Also, even a tiny bit of research indicates that Ian is a very experienced celebrity journalist, who is going to legally document everything said on every page, making legal action ultimately futile. So, I’m guessing that this is all bluster that will fade away when it comes to an actual court test, but unfortunately Ian will likely have to endure it until then (and we will get less from Ian while he is tied up defending himself).

    Reply
  25. mooki said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:51 am

    if you want proof a hasbeen, look no further than Aaron Carter:
    http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/36297834.html

    Reply
  26. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    @mooki:
    Boy, am I behind the times! I never heard of any of them (ok, maybe the Adam guy – was that the singer on the Idol program?). Laughing at my ancient self! :P

    Reply
  27. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    @ladybert62:

    Yep its defo me, am distinguishing myself from all the stalkers/wannabes! I think all the regulars should change our names to something appropriate to our cyber image. You could be Evil Ms Hapless LadyBert62 or something to that effect!

    Reply
  28. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Megan Fox = budget Angelina. She is Asda to Angelina’s Tescos; Superdrug to Angelina’s Boots the Chemist; and Foxes Glacier Mints to Angelina’s wine gums. Need I say any more?

    Reply
  29. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:36 am

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Yeah ITA, Megan says stuff like that to get press, just like her mentor!

    Reply
  30. Spartacus said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    No, I’m the real Keane actually, so step off “Queen” dear or you’ll be hit by a square mile of the most bitter bitch ever to come out of Oxford University xx

    Reply
  31. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:51 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    OK – as long as I know to whom I am talking. But, I will stay plain and simple LadyBert 62! :P

    Reply
  32. LurkeyLoo said on June 17th, 2009 at 11:08 am

    Really, Ian? This is what you are reporting now…I have to say I am starting to feel duped.

    Reply
  33. Wonderment said on June 17th, 2009 at 11:17 am

    You know who else is a New York Times bestseller? James Frey. His “non-fiction” book shot to the top of the bestseller list and received high acclaim by Oprah Winfrey herself, too bad all of his followers were duped when it was later revealed that the content in his book was both fabricated and exaggerated. OJ Simpson himself was likewise about to become a bestselling author until the abrupt cancellation of his book, which at the time was near the top of Amazon’s bestselling books on pre-order. Just pointing out that being a bestseller by producing a book about a hot topic or one that garners widespread attention hardly equates to having a reputable image.

    Reply
  34. Baby Keane said on June 17th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    You slay me. Can I become your partner in crime?

    Reply
  35. sinker said on June 17th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    quote from megan fox article “She added: “I don’t have any friends who are actresses. I actually only had one girlfriend growing up. Most of my friends were boys. I was such a tomboy.”

    ugh. no girl friends, sounds just like jolie. and her stage mom had her first modeling jobs in slutty shoots as well. just like someone else, eh? they both try way too hard to be both “cool” and “hot.” puke. JMO IMO

    Reply
  36. mooki said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    more details about Katie Holmes’s So You Think You Can Dance performance:
    she’s gonna perform to Judy Garland’s “Get Happy” wtf!??!

    first of all, Liza and Lorna must be pretty pissed. ($cientology is anti-gay [for a “religion” who is home to many closeted gay/lesbo actors), plus the gals and their late mama were/are devout Episcopalians and L. Ron’s psycho-babble sci-fi smears Christianity (a cult slamming a real religion? gag me) calling Christ a pedo. I know….

    Reply
  37. mooki said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    link to Katie Holmes news:
    http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-17-more-katie-holmes-dance-deets

    Reply
  38. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @sinker:

    A good thing about Megan Fox though is that by being a living parody of Ange, she exposes her to be the utterly shallow and vacuous human being that she is. Nadya Suleman is another great example. Both Suleman and Fox clearly do what they do and say what they say for attention, which in turn makes people question the motivations of the woman they are imitating. I think Ange has got away with a lot in her career and managed to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes with regard to who she really is. She is all style over substance, and has got a very long way by seeming to be or do things more than actually being or doing them.

    To me she is the ultimate example of the modern desire for a short-cut to celebdom. She wanted to get to the top in HW but couldn’t get there on her own steam, so she piggy-backed a ride on someone who had actually managed to get there on his. She wants to be seen as a great humanitarian but she doesn’t want to have to get her hands dirty or do a lot of hard work, so she does promotional work which garners her attention and accolades without requiring the graft. She wants to be seen as an intellectual but she couldn’t be bothered to apply herself to getting any higher education. She wants to be a politician but doesn’t want to do the decades of work required to build herself up to that position. So instead she seeks advice on how to “position herself” in the higher echelons of Washington from political bigwigs. Might she do that by piggybacking her way there on another man, married or otherwise, who knows? She fosters an image of herself as an “earth mother” but has a team of at least 6 nannies to do all the hard graft for her. So what does she actually do? Run around in a variety of costumes and wigs and take home $10 million of course, thank you very much!

    So I do take my hat off to her, because there has probably never been another human being in history who has elevated themselves to such a high position in life without actually doing any hard work whatsoever, unless you call “hard work” doing some of your own stunts. So yeah Angelina, I give credit where credit’s due. You have achieved what every other glamour model and reality TV star so desperately aspires to do: get famous for being famous. Congrats to you!

    And the trolls can stick that in their pipe and smoke it, Angelina’s own and the bottom feeders of the interwebs alike!

    Reply
  39. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @ Keane Cyber Queen Supreme – hy my little cyber queen,thought for a minute there at 10.35 you were going soft and completing the fraudster jolie but just read your 1.21 to sinker and i must say – class pure class,you always manage to type everything i am thinking,don’t know how you do it you just do! kudos ifinite :)

    Reply
  40. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @ Keane Cyber Queen Supreme – meant to complementing of course1

    Reply
  41. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    sorry for all my typing errors(or typos as you say in US) but i have a had a large glass of wine after a stressful days work!

    Reply
  42. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    You have a way with words Keane! Another great recap of the life of the evil Ms. Jolie! :D

    Reply
  43. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @topbrit:
    Hi Top Brit! Hey, another great excuse for my typos – except I dont drink wine (gives me migraines) so I stick to Baileys! Willl tip one to your health tonight when I get home after a stressful day of work! :D

    Reply
  44. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @topbrit:

    Thanks topbrit, I was wondering where you’d been, good to see you back!x

    Reply
  45. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Thanks LadyB, when things occur to me I like to write them down to get them out of my head, otherwise it gets a bit cluttered. I just needed to get that one out of my head/off my chest! BTW where is the lovely Kate C. Bitchy I wonder? I miss her! And Togi too, where are you?

    Reply
  46. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    HI Ian – just read the article Toronto Star article you mention in the above post about your book. Sounds like I should be buying it! Congratulations on it is already into its second printing as it is flying off the shelves! Can’t wait for your expose of the evil Ms. Jolie and hapless Mr. Pitt! :D

    Reply
  47. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Sounds to me as if Megan used Angie’s Bio as an outline for hers. She could be so much more, if she only had a brain@sinker:

    Reply
  48. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Saw the new cover page of In Touch Weekly…..just a small corner note stating Brad and Jen hooked up recently at her home in LA…..so….why no photos of this huh? Jen has to be leaving soon for NYC i’d think….hope she changes the sheets before Angie shows up …teehee

    Reply
  49. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @ ladybert62 – why thank you my dear,i will drink one to your good self this very minute(should’nt though with work tomorrow but what the hell)i too like baileys with ice,my my what good taste we have on the board!ditto about ian’s publication on mr and mrs bullshit,i don’t really read a lot but would go out of my way for that one!

    Reply
  50. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    While googling and CCPing what i find on Google, i ran across a comment Juliette Lewis made about Brad …. the URL is on the last topic. She likens Brad’s penis to “two grains of sand , one on top of the other”….lmao! I had no idea there were such quotes about him out there, they never seemed to get much press pre-Angie

    Reply
  51. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Juliette Lewis’ Tiny Penis comment about Brad Pitt
    http://www.hecklerspray.com/brad-pitt-has-a-tiny-penis-juliette-lewis/200711342.php

    Reply
  52. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    Also, while getting random questions out of my head, i read on Jonathan Vincent Voight’s bio that he has THREE acting children. We know of Angie and James, but i’ve never heard a word about Matt Sigourney, aka Wheels……anyone have any info on this one? Does he drop the Voight like Angie, hence the Matt Sigourney name? IAN…can you help on this one?

    Reply
  53. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    IMO Spencer and Heidi are a waste of human compounds….totally empty air heads…@mooki:

    Reply
  54. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    @ Keane Cyber Queen Supreme – thanks mate,been busy with work and family and life in general,same as everyone here,but i’ve been looking in and have not liked all the dicks on here lately taking the piss and trying to turn into jj,yano the ones.they annoy me so much i wouldn’t be able to ignore them(which is totally the way to go) so i show my distain by not commenting and taking it out on my cat(jokey poos)sorry for not showing my support to all the decents on the board but i am with you all in spirit constantly

    Reply
  55. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    It’s good to see you here topbrit. Enjoy your down time, and no worry about the JJ’s, they are like farts, they stink for awhile, then blow away. A very appropriate analogy i think….wink!!! BTW, have Crown Royal on me, since my diagnoses i can’t have it anymore…diet Pepsi here i come….wink!!@topbrit:

    Reply
  56. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @ Patty Anne – haha great link patty,have you read the comments below that article too? seems everyone knows about pitts teeny weeny by now, probably even the slighty slow over rated susan boyle!just thought i would throw that one in there,don’t understand the fascination with her by your goodselves there in the US.i personally find ‘britains got talent’ so orchestrated and cheeeeeeeeeeeeeesy though jmo

    Reply
  57. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @ patty anne – what is CCPing hun?

    Reply
  58. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @topbrit:
    Hey – I thought I was the only one who drank it on ice! I tell myself because of the ice that I can have two just one since the ice fills up most of the glass (it is a teeny little Bailey’s special glass!) Any ole excuse to have a Baileys! My sweetie pie hubby always teases me about the ice! I just laugh back and toss down another! :D

    Reply
  59. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @ patty anne – thanks honey i will do,hey and diet pepsi has got it going on too,alcohol is very over rated if you ask me,unfortunately i succumb once in a while but your not missing much babes honest!

    Reply
  60. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @topbrit:
    I think it means “copying”.

    Reply
  61. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    @topbrit:
    By the way, I love your avatar – some day when I figure out how to get one, I will have one by my name! :P

    Reply
  62. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @ ladybert62 – that is a great motto my friend ‘just laugh back and toss down another’,i will adopt this motto and take it through life with me if thats ok,what with copyright and everything lol

    Reply
  63. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    @topbrit:
    Its all yours Toppie! Have another one (on me) to celebrate! :P

    Reply
  64. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    America’s Got Talent is the same. Seems to me the only good to come from these shows is Simon’s auto collection!…lol. I personally do not watch them. We have a new medical show on here now, starring Jada Pinket Smith, watched it last night, was very entertaining….if i want to hear the cats howling, i can go on my back deck and listen to the seranade..@topbrit:

    Reply
  65. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @topbrit:
    When i surf for new information, i used the Google search engine. When i find something of interest posted that way, i CCP ( copy, cut, and paste) it as it is shown there onto my post, sort of a courtesy to whomever posted that thought /idea first. Everyone does it, no biggie. You highlight what you want to copy by scrolling over it with the LEFT button pressed on your mouse…..Then while holding your cursor on the highlighted words, you RIGHT click on the mouse and select SAVE….take it where you want it to be, RIGHT click the mouse and select PASTE…. :-)

    Reply
  66. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @ ladybert62 – why thank you,i think it is banksey but not sure.don’t worry hun i have only just learned to do smileys and here’s one just for you ;)

    Reply
  67. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @topbrit:

    Yep ITA, when it comes to Susan Boyle I genuinely think the world has gone mad. She is an average-good singer but she hit all the wrong notes in her rendition of Memory and in I Dreamed A Dream she not only got the timing wrong but didn’t even sing the right words. There is a singer of her calibre in every am dram groupd and church choir across the land, but she will be the one cashing in! Chi-ching for Susan and for Simon too of course; he is laughing all the way to the bank as usual!

    Reply
  68. Different Guest said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @Patty Anne:I think it’s a daughter, can’t remember her name and her imdb bio does not list him as her dad.

    Reply
  69. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    @ patty anne -thanks for that hun and sorry for my ignorance.i skyplus dexter and ghost whisperer love them!prison break was included in that too but it’s finished here now.boo hoo i just love me some wentworth miller,i would call my next child wentworth(great name imo) if i didn’t have enough of the brats already and if i wasn’t neutered as i call it haha.hope i don’t come across as a kate gossseewhatsaface parenting school graduate,just give me some bloody water will you! lol

    Reply
  70. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    Megan Denise Fox born May 16, 1986…yea! A Taurus! She has the most beautiful piercing blue eyes imo. And Fox is her real last name….
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan_Fox
    She’s a relatively young starlett, at just 23, so with time i think she will grow into more serious parts. She has the appeal, beauty, and hopefully there is a brain hidden in there somewhere….lol :-)

    Reply
  71. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    Lol brit! I love Ghost Whisperer also. I go for those paranormal type shows…i honestly believe in ghosts too. JMO. I enjoy being entertained when i relax in the evening and watch television, and i hate having to put up with nonsence shows, these reality shows are a waste of air time imo. If i want reality, i’ll sit out front and watch the world at large, but i live with enough reality during the day to rather enjoy my peace and pleasure down time….@topbrit:

    Reply
  72. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    So Jonathan Voight also has a daughter we don’t hear about as well as a second son, Matt Sigourney? My , my, what one can find when they Google….wink!!@Different Guest:

    Reply
  73. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    @ Keane Cyber Queen Supreme – ditto my friend,what worries me if our pals over in us and oz and beyond think us brits all have hairy chins and top teeth white and bottom teeth yella omg haha,like she is an average brit but we have a get out clause cos she is a scottie,no offence to anyone especially you sue,get well in priory mate asap!

    Reply
  74. Robot In Disguise said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    She is doing everything she can to emulate Jolie… what part of this is so appealing to you?

    Reply
  75. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    I think she’s way older than 23 to be honest, if you look at her skin on camera it is pretty aged, dry and thick and clerly held together by botox. I think she’s quite a bit over 30. Not that much younger than Angelina. I don’t think she’ll get away with the tag of being “the young Angelina” for too long. I think the fact that they’re probably quite near each other in age will become more and more apparent as time goes on!

    Reply
  76. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    @ patty anne – me too,i used to watch crossing over with john edwards and failed to see how that could be made up imo,and reality tv can’t stand it big brother,the hills etc a big no no as too x factor,pop idol,dancing with whoever nah!anyhoo i am very interested to hear voight has got 4 kids and not two as it says on the tin(quote from brit advert about ronseal varnish,fence paint etc etc)

    Reply
  77. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    @topbrit:

    Do you read a Brit site called HolyMoly at all? Its not earth-shattering stuff but you get the occasional good bit of goss (the Katie Price is more chickly than dickly these days suggestion for one!). Apparently Susan Boyle is well known for throwing fits and calling ambulances to take her to hospital whenever she gets a bit stressed out. They said she has merely upgraded the standard of hospital! She does have a mild learning disability I think. I bet she is an absolute nightmare for whoever her management company is to handle!

    Reply
  78. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Off topic but on the more general recent topic, was just reading a message from a group I’m a member of supporting the protests in Iran about the use of Twitter. Its incredible how important blogging and sites like twitter are becoming, literally providing people with a medium to resist dictatorship. It has some resonance so thought people might be interested in reading it:

    Becoming Iranian: Iran Election Cyberwarfare Guide”

    The purpose of this guide is to help you participate constructively in the Iranian election protests through twitter.

    1. Do NOT publicise proxy IP.s over twitter, and especially not using the #iranelection hashtag. Security forces are monitoring this hashtag, and the moment they identify a proxy IP they will block it in Iran. If you are creating new proxies for the Iranian bloggers, DM them to @stopAhmadi or @iran09 and they will distributed them discretely to bloggers in Iran.

    2.Hashtags, the only two legitimate hashtags being used by bloggers in Iran are #iranelection and #gr88, other hashtag ideas run the risk of diluting the conversation.

    3.Keep you commonsense antenna up! Security forces are now setting up twitter accounts to spread disinformation by posing as Iranian protesters. Please don’t retweet impetuously, try to confirm information with reliable sources before retweeting. The legitimate sources are not hard to find and follow.

    4. Help cover the bloggers: change your twitter settings so that your location is Tehran and your time zone is GMT +3.30. Security forces are hunting for bloggers using location and timezone searches. If we all become Iranians. it becomes much harder to find them.

    5. Don’t blow their cover! If you discover a genuine source, please don.t publicise their name or location on a website. These bloggers are in real danger. Spread the word discretely through your own networks but don’t signpost them to the security forces. People are dying there, for real, please keep that in mind.

    6. Denial of Service attacks. If you don’t know what you are doing, stay out of this game. Only target those sites the legitimate Iranian bloggers are designating. Be aware that these attacks can have detrimental effects to the network the protesters are relying on. Keep monitoring their traffic to note when you should turn the taps on or off.

    7. Do spread the (legitimate) word, it works! When the bloggers asked for twitter maintenance to be postponed using the #nomaintenance tag, it had the desired effect. As long as we spread good information, provide moral support to the protesters, and take our lead from the legitimate bloggers, we can make a constructive contribution.

    Interesting huh?

    Reply
  79. topbrit said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    @ Keane Cyber Queen Supreme – i have heard of it,didn’t know it was a brit site though.i will be checking it out with my usuals,ita about susan especially from her reaction when she lost bgt lol,bloody ell didn’t know that bout katie price,hey get in there mate lol

    Reply
  80. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Do you just read at Holy Moly or is that a message board

    Reply
  81. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @topbrit:

    Ha ha ha!!!! Yes I was shocked to read it too as I always thought she was one of the ones who was definitely not into women. She’s so open about everything, including that, so I definitely would have thought she would have said if she did. The exact quote was something to the effect of “Which recently split couple’s protestations about the reason for their split are sounding a little hollow? His reasons seem genuine enough but her’s seem strange considering her tastes for the past couple of years have been more, um, sapphic?! You just never know with these people! So watch out for lots of fake PR stories about Jordan and her the new men in her life, could well be a cover! (BTW you have to sign up for the mailout to get the reasonable goss, the site itself is pretty shite).

    Reply
  82. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @Kate:

    It’s a site but all the best goss comes through the mailout. It used to be a LOT better than it is now but a couple of years ago it went all mainstream with big advertising etc. Now the items are much more tame. What would have once been stated directly is now concealed as a blind so basically the whole mailout is virtually now in that form. People can guess who it is so maybe it is a way of encouraging comments, he doesn’t get very many. Much of the other items are extremely lame. The guy who runs that site came here way back at the beginning and commented on a story about Anna Nicole Smith do you remember? Something about Ian’s alleged shenanigans with her. I said well at least Ian gets the odd story Mr Moly, as the old saying goes, those with crap gossip sites should not throw stones!

    Reply
  83. too curious said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @ladybert62:

    What, no “Pink Hex Necklace Ladybert62″????? Or “Her Royal Majesty of the Order of the Pink Hex Necklace”???

    I’m baaaaaaaaaaack – I have Internet again after four loooooooooooooong days!! I finally got on the site for a short while the other day and posted a theory on “Jen-knew-for-18-months” on Ian’s support for the ladies thread, but I was so late that the only response I got was from a presumed loon – someone who mentioned her spirit guide, anyway…

    Reply
  84. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I came across a site during my Google searches and saw a photo with description of your Katie Price….they referenced her, “leather covered basket balls”…lmao. She must be the equivalent of our Shanna Sands, the Lucite Queen

    Reply
  85. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    welcome back!!! and as for your response..lmao…i know what you mean, i read a few “spirit guide” comments that led me to believe the spirit comes directly out of a bottle@too curious:

    Reply
  86. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @too curious:
    HI too curious! We missed you – I saw your comment/theory but did not comment! No, I will keep my name the way it is, plain and simple – like me! You havent missed very much – the site has been s l o w and nothing re the evil Ms. Jolie and hapless Mr. Pitt – yawn….. oh well, maybe Ian or Sugar Ray or Ms. NineCents will give us some fodder for the feeder tomorrow! :P

    Reply
  87. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Can you go to the discussion forum and register so I can send you a PM..thanks..

    sorry I know this is rude guys, but it has nothing to do with the board, just personal ..

    Reply
  88. Constant Gardner said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    LOL then I will be Nutbag

    Reply
  89. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    Dang, Ian, you are going to get me fired with all these racy pictures you post with your articles – I am doing this at work and keep expecting someone to complain about what is on my screen – I am getting very good at the “reduce the screen” button! :D

    Reply
  90. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @Kate:

    On HolyMoly do you mean?

    Reply
  91. ladybert62 said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    NO CG – dont change your name! Then I wont know who I am talking to! Stay yourself, constant gardner :P

    Reply
  92. Constant Gardner said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I am leary of any media (Twitter) that the MSM is promoting. And over here, these gasbags on TV have no real news so they are now all about “TWITTER ME” FACEBOOK ME, MYSPACE ME. Disgusting BC they have no problem calling internet users all kinds of shitty things, tinfoilhatters, etc. So Twitter for Iran propaganda=good and for truthtelling=”those crazy internets!”

    Reply
  93. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    No, here, go to the top of this blog where it says Discussion Forum, click then when you are in the forum, register.

    Reply
  94. Constant Gardner said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Or maybe Constant Nutbag!

    Reply
  95. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2008/12/22/biographer-claims-michael-jackson-seriously-ill/

    Rolling Stone did some digging today and determined that many of Halperin’s other assertions don’t hold up. The first line of Halperin’s biography reads “Ian Halperin is also a former winner of the Rolling Stone magazine Award for Investigative Journalism.” This came as news to us, so we looked in our own archives and discovered this claim has been greatly exaggerated: He did win an RS honor, but it was the College Journalism Award in 1985 and it was split among the staff at Concordia University’s student newspaper in Montreal.

    Reply
  96. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:
    That’s old news to us, IAN said that himself. But thanks for the research. Now see if you can find out more information on Jonathan Vincent Voight’s other child, a son, Matt Sigourney, also known as “Wheels” Thanks!

    Reply
  97. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    Still, Halperin’s claims are intriguing: Jackson was seen in a wheelchair earlier this year and The Sun quotes his brother Jermaine saying, “He’s not doing so well right now. This isn’t a good time.” Plus, Jackson did claim to be sick when he was avoiding that whole Bahrain lawsuit trial in London. We put out calls to Halperin but have yet to get a response.
    To UnEffinBelievable You left this paragraph out

    @Patty Anne:
    @Patty Anne:

    Reply
  98. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    hmm well I see you registered, but I can not figure out how you use these things, so maybe if you can you can PM me.

    Reply
  99. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    @Kate:

    I have no idea how you use it either, I didn’t know we could PM each other, I thought you knew!

    Reply
  100. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Good God she’s coming here to post it as well, my goodness I just roasted her on the other thread for posting something people have been saying for about 6 months now, and she tries again here! Oh I’m really beginning to feel sorry for her now, it’s so “notice me, notice me, I so want to be significant”. No-one ever cared what she said on DListed either. I guess she has to try to make people notice her on more than just the one board!

    Reply
  101. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Or how about “Pass Me My Tinfoil Hat it Was the Scientologists Wot Did it!” (and I mean that in the nicest possible way of course!). I think we should play up to type to the max! BTW ITA with you re: twitter, look how powerful the medium of the internet is, that’s why its so interesting. Who’d have thought a relatively new social networking site would play a crucial role in resistance to dictatorship? I bet Twitter can’t believe their luck advertising wise too! Little did they know their fun board would play a crucial role in world events!

    Reply
  102. Keane's Taco said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    Keane , the more I read your rants the more I think you are worse than the Brangaloonies! With you it’s all I know this and I know that – no in reality unless you live with that family you know shit – you are ASSUMING. You are taking tabloid gossip as gospel (sp?). as someone said a while ago you really invest an awful lot of time on this one particular family and the more I read the more I think you believe totally in the drivel you write unlike the other snarkers here you are WAY too invested – time to step back to reality girl. Just hate on them without bringing other crap in ie: dog play (unless you saw that with your own eyes it’s heresay-not truth)

    Submitted by Keane on Sat, 03/07/2009 – 6:51pm.
    miffed_33 – not one part of anything I have said about Brange has been taken from a tabloid. The stuff I have written about their PR and their nannies is absolute fact, the image they sell of themselves to the world is a total fabrication. A lot of the stuff I know about them comes from the fact that I work in the media industry and know a lot about what goes on behind the scenes and how the game works. There are plenty of fraudulent celebs out there, but they are the biggest ones of all and they are making by far the most money out of deluding their poor gullible fans. And the media refuse to go after them because they wield such power. Instead they get away with very bad behvaiour and no-one ever calls them out on it. This makes me very angry and I think the balance needs to be redressed. That is all.

    And thanks so much for the compliment that what I write is drivel you ignorant little fuck, but I can assure you that its not, and when I’m repeating something that I’m not 100% sure of I most certainly state that. And as for “getting back to reality”, you unfortunately are making the very stupid assumption that you know exactly what that is and all other possibilities are therefore excluded. And as I’ve said before the amount of time I spend thinking about this family is minimal, I simply think and type fast. And thanks so much for your instructions about what I should do and what I should say when I come to this site, but that is actually not one bit of your fucking business. Its not for you to tell me what I can and can’t say here and I don’tneed to just do what everyone else does and say shit about what the kids look like for example, that doesn’t interest me at all. So all in all if you don’t like my posts then don’t fucking read them and generally just go fuck yourself really.

    Submitted by miffed_33 on Sat, 03/07/2009 – 7:08pm.
    blah blah Keane, so Ianundercover (where you got most of your so called inside information) is not a tabloid but may as well be. I personally still believe you pull shit out your arse and the thing is you fully believe it.
    As for going and fucking myself I don’t need to I have a man to do the job for me but thanks for thinking of me.

    Submitted by Keane on Sat, 03/07/2009 – 7:27pm.
    miffed_13 – like I said tosser, sorry to come over all superior, but I can pretty much categorically say that I know a darn sight more about the world of show than a pathetic little twat like you. But with all the media wisdom you’ve required from, (I don’t know, waitressing was it?), I’m sure you think you’re so much more of an authority on everything than me. So from here on in I will officially stop believing anything I read from journos who have sources from within Brange’s staff. Rather than using any of my own judgement from my own journalistic and research experience I will instead just listen to the gospel according to miffed_13. From now on in anything I hear from sources connected to HW or journos I will immediately defer to you as you appear to know everything there is to know and exactly what is “drivel” and what is the truth (e.g. what you think, based on your limited understanding and knowledge of the media game).

    Erm, yeah I think I might pass actually and stick with my own judgement thanks. And as I said before, don’t like my posts, don’t read them but don’t presume to go around telling me what I should and shouldn’t do, cos it really has got absolutely fuck all to do with the likes of you. Now if I’ve made myself clear we can leave it there and never bother each other again can’t we?

    Submitted by miffed_33 on Sat, 03/07/2009 – 7:44pm.
    Keane ‘posting my views on a gossip blog’-exactly that your views. I am also allowed to post whatever the fuck I like on a blog and I was just saying my observation about you and I still think you are way too far into this family and that is MY view. I am certainly allowed to have my own opinions without you starting the name calling because if I re-read back I’m sure you will find I never called you any names. There’s no need to go all 3rd grade with the name calling-you can get your point across without it.

    Submitted by Lindalou on Sat, 03/07/2009 – 8:38pm.
    Keane

    Agree, way too invested, way too sure youre in the know. Trust me youre not.

    Submitted by MayWest69 on Sat, 03/07/2009 – 9:38pm.
    keane, get a hobby.
    ____________________________________________________________
    I agree with Keane theoretically (in her analysis and breakdown of how celebrity functions). I’m just sayin’…she’s a know-it-all asshole.

    Reply
  103. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Oh I think I may have totally misinterpreted your post there, sorry, it is late and I’m tired! I’m confused about your perspective, do you think twitter is being used for Iranian propaganda? I think it is being used to promote democracy….

    Reply
  104. Different Guest said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    @Kate:ladies, it might be easier to use twitter, you can make followers/followed private and then you can exchange your email addresses

    Reply
  105. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @Different Guest:

    Yeah there isn’t a way of private messaging each other in the forum is there? Shall we try to do that Kate? Is it urgent BTW because I need to go to bed?

    Reply
  106. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    This has nothing to do with the state of Michael Jackson’s health. What I am saying is that Ian delieberately and knowingly embellished the facts about his “RS magazine Award for Investigative Journalism” and only clarified it when he was outed as having misrepresented it.

    Reply
  107. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    OH MY GOD THIS IS BRAND NEW INFORMATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I CAN’T HANDLE THE NEWNESS OF IT, DON’T STARE DIRECTLY AT IT IT WILL BLIND YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Wow what a contribution to the blog UFB, WAY TO GO! Give her her dues though, she managed to make a very rare (if utterly feeble) point that wasn’t about her fantasy lover (me)! It’s like watching your children take their first baby steps without you. I am shedding several tears of pride. There goes one, there’s another! Oh well done UFB, well done xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Reply
  108. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:
    So you are saying he didn’t want to admit to a fact that anyone could reveal with little effort and risk his journo reputation for that? That dosen’t sound plausible to me, but i understand your point in this.

    Reply
  109. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    I wonder where Megan bought her undies set…i love that bra and pantys! Didn’t Brad buy something like that for Angie’s birthday as reported in one of the many mags? If that is true, it seems Brad is trying to get along with Angie during the end of their lustful relationship…perhaps one day they will manage to settle into a nice friendship, for the sake of the kids

    Reply
  110. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    BATTEN DOWN YOUR TIN FOIL HATS LADIES THE EARTH IS ABOUT TO IMPLODE, THE OMNISCIENT UFB HAS UNCOVERED BRAND NEW HITHERTO NEVER DISCUSSED TOTALLY ORIGINAL INFORMATION BY THE MEDIUM OF A QUICK GOOGLE SEACRH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PREPARE FOR IMPACT, TAKE COVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 10, 9, 8, 7, 6……………………………………. THIS IS IT, THE WORLD IS ENDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Oh, it didn’t.

    Never mind.

    TAKE COVER, DO NOT ATTEMPT TO

    Reply
  111. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    …. ASK UFB IF SHE REMEMBERED TO WEAR HER TINFOIL HAT. SHE IS CURRENTLY FRYING IN THE NUCLEAR FALL OUT. DIDN’T WE TELL YOU TO WEAR YOUR TIN FOIL HAT UFB, DIDN’T WE?????????????????????????????

    Reply
  112. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    I believe Rolling Stone concluded that the claim was….. exaggerated:He did win an RS honor, but it was the College Journalism Award in 1985 and it was split among the staff at Concordia University’s student newspaper in Montreal.

    So, IAN claimed to have won an award for investigative journalism from Rolling Stone, …..which he did…..along with others in his group at college. So, it’s true, but misunderstood? Splitting hairs here i feel…

    Reply
  113. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    And scene.

    Reply
  114. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    It was because Ian refused to cut the journo in on a story because he doesn’t do that so the guy tried to discredit him. Big effing deal. The Chief Foreign Correspondent on one of the UK’s main terrestrial channels lied about what class of degree he got when he started out as a journo. He is now one of the most respected journos in the UK and has been for many years. Embellishing something on your CV does not automatically = you are a shady liar. I would love to see UFB’s CV. I wonder how many made up grades, jobs and references appear on that!

    Reply
  115. cb42 said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    Ian saying HE won the award is most certainly exaggerated. Now, if he were to have said that he and his group won it, then there would be nothing to mis-interpret. It was a group award, but to read the bio page, it seems as if he’s the only one to win it. Kinda shafting the other people who worked on the project.

    Reply
  116. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    The first line of Halperin’s biography reads “Ian Halperin is also a former winner of the Rolling Stone magazine Award for Investigative Journalism.” This came as news to us, so we looked in our own archives and discovered this claim has been greatly exaggerated: He did win an RS honor, but it was the College Journalism Award in 1985 and it was split among the staff at Concordia University’s student newspaper in Montreal. Halperin also co-wrote

    Direct quote above, no where does IAN say HE wond the award, but rather A winner of etc. Use of the word HE would have indeed indicated no one else won the award, however by using the word A….it could indicate one, two, twenty, or more won A award… So i don’t see a clear attempt to eleminate the other winners of AN award from RS….i do however agree that he did not specifically identify the particular award though…..perhaps that is where it came to be called “exagerated” by RS….

    Reply
  117. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    @cb42:

    Don’t be ridiculous cb42, Ian saying he won an award does not automatically mean he is saying everyone else didn’t. I’m sure all those students have it on their CV. I’d say you are rather desperately trying to split hairs. Jeez Louise are you people desperate to latch on to anything that may remotely protect the evil one or what?

    Oh and UFB, I now really see why all you’ve ever done on this blog is abuse me. When you open your mouth and let out an opinion about anything remotely connected to the actual blog, it all gets rather embarrassing for you doesn’t it? Under the circumstances I can see why you stick to just bashing me, protects you from humiliation doesn’t it? There there, Keaney kiss it better. I feel like I am offering a public service.

    Ok y’all, I’m off to bed, my tinfoil hat has taken enough action for one day for sure! Have a great evening folks, catch you all tomorrow x

    Reply
  118. cb42 said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    I should have worded my post differently, but it just go to show how things can be misleading. I should have simply pointed out that his bio page is mis-leading. I guess you can also question where the site got the info. Did Ian give it to them? I can’t say, but it would be logical for people to assume that he did.

    Patty, your post just proves that out. And Rolling Stone’s comments as saying he exaggerated do as well like you said. People can look and see “IH is a former winner….” and interpret that as he won it on his own. They’d never see it as a group award. That’s really the whole point. He shouldn’t have had to come out and clarify it.

    Reply
  119. MaeIAsk said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    OK – I guess you are the real Keane judging by the length of your post.

    Reply
  120. How I Make $300 a Day Online said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    Hey, nice post, really well written. You should blog more about this.

    Reply
  121. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    @cb42:
    True, it’s all in how the individual interprets what is printed. But, isn’t that true in most things? How we look upon something and the take we form on that is up to us as individuals. I know that i won a group award in High School, however on my resume’ i did not list each and every other person in the group who won as well, as they were not involved in the applilcation for the specific position that i was. Would the administration be interested in the names of the 19 others in the group who won an award with me? I think not. Perhaps that was IAN’s outlook as well, who knows. As with all things gossip, it’s speculation in the end, because none of us can speak with certainty of another’s motives. I do appreciate your dialog though, you do have some good points worth thought….

    Reply
  122. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    lmao!! Good one!

    Reply
  123. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:13 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Throwing up my great Pinot Noir I just had opened after a very hard long day …….. fame is a whore on butt row … her Foxy mini me is Reductio ad absurdum = reduction to the absurd. I am all for it. The more Foxy shows, the more absurd AJ looks – the more I see Foxy, the more I think of AJ, the more I have cause to throw up.

    Reply
  124. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    …the faster this all ends…. Please BP, please call it THE END…. Thank you….

    Reply
  125. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I don’t know how to twitter lol, there is a PM function here, but it does not look like it works. It appears you have to click on a name from the member list and all the names are not loaded by an admin, there are only about 4 names in it, so it does not work. Whoever worked on the forum must have just quit in the middle of it. lol

    Reply
  126. Admire Angelina said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    Your time is coming…………..I hope very soon!

    Closing this site and shutting you down would be great.

    Reply
  127. curiouscatz said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    curiouscatz said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
    Keane said on May 23rd, 2009 at 3:22 pm
    @SZ:
    Ok this is going to sound completely irritating too everyone so unless you are SZ please skip over it. Ok, just to say it in brief, I was doing professional theatre at the age of 8, I was shortlisted for the Royal Ballet school at 11, I was top of my class in all classes at school all my life, I am trained in all forms of dance at the highest level and got the highest grades for all exams, I am a LAMDA trained actor and won at a lot of the drama festivals I competed in, I went to Oxford, came 26th out of the 260 people in my year in my first year exams so got a scholarship, worked in television making programmes in the most respected strands on the most respected channels in the UK and I’ve been scouted by a modelling agency in London. Do you honestly think that I consider making comments on an internet blog a big achievement and that I am here to flatter my ego?

    Did you train with Alexa-Maria?
    Alexa’s musical passion started at a young age when she attended stage school from the age of 8.
    She went on to star in numerous plays, most notably at Oxford University where she starred as Musetta in La Boheme at the Oxford Playhouse and April in Company by Sondheim. She also had a leading role in the off-West End premiere of Falsettos and was a chorister at Keble College, Oxford. As for dancing, Alexa trained at the Royal Ballet School in Birmingham until the age of 11 and has since danced Ballroom and Latin competitively for Oxford University.
    Naptime Heiffer said on June 16th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
    @curiouscatz:
    Very interesting catz. Someone has been copying and pasting their life story. Busted Keane!

    Reply
  128. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    @Kate:
    Is your computer Windows operated? If so you can download Windows Live Messenger….then if Keane can do the same, you just add one another to your “buddy” list and pm

    Reply
  129. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    @Admire Angelina:

    You too , my dear, are traveling on the mothership of all delusions – fare-thee-well ….

    Reply
  130. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    Okay, the rumor is that Angelina Jolie is a true lesbian, and used Brad as her beard, and for threesome sexual activities. Lets suppose that Angie decided she has all she needed a man, any man but a dumb ass one such as Brad worked well to her advantage, to procreate with. Now….Angie prefers women over men, Angie is a bio mom now, and has a small army of little kids. She and her woman lover can now happily move to France where incest between adults is legal, and have three ways with her woman, her brother, herself to her hearts content. She retires from film as no one bothers to buy her movies anymore, spends tons on herself with paps so that she seems very popular and thus soothes her ego, stomps grapes barefooted with Maddox while singing I Am Cried I….to the world at large. Once a month her private phychiatrist pays a visit to work with Angie’s problems with ….others. When he’s finished with their session, he can freely go boink any one of the twenty nannies he prefers, but they are all dog chyt ugly since Braddy was caught boinking the purdy one. Sometimes Brad does pay a visit to the kids, but he brings his two wives with him…he’s given up U.S. citizenship and become and African Chief who can change his laws to allow for multiple wives. George Clooney waits in the harbour on his private yaught for Brad and his wimmins (one is a man in drag..shhhh) to return so they can have some good ole boy ….fun. And so is the life of the imaginary Brangalina Bunch..

    Reply
  131. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Ian was a regular correspondent on 60 minutes and Court TV, not once but often. Also he was interviews on CNN and NBC when his expose on Scientology came out, and they also talked about this award, they reasearched it and presented Ian. For those who have a problem with this, perhaps one of these stations could help you out, because they are fully aware of Ian’s resume. The award was a joint effort with another student and with a couple of editors. The aritcle written by the guy in RS was over a tiff, he was irritated with Ian, that article is a result. It is not a big deal. The lawsuit filed against him that several bloggers are droning on about do not seem to be aware that the person who filed it was in the end found to be at fault, not only him, but his entire department. They were all put on suspention and Ian was completely cleared. Not because he was crafty, but because he did not do anything wrong. These said bloggers are presently blogging up a slander/libel suit as I understand it. just a fyi. Not much else to keep talking about on this.

    Give the world the best you have and you’ll get kicked in the teeth. Give the world the best you have anyway.:)

    Reply
  132. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    @Kate:
    Nice philosophy Kate. And i thank you for clearing that up…For Everyone! Seems instead of Rolling Stone as a source, it would have been better to Google the issue itself. As always, i’ve learned something new here…

    Reply
  133. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Patty Anne….. gag me with a crimping iron….that was f*ing hilarious ……

    Reply
  134. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    oh you mean like chat back and forth , I see, didn’t think about that. that is possible.

    Reply
  135. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    @Kate:

    or download Skype (free) … and you can talk, with or without camera …… also invite 3rd parties to chat

    Reply
  136. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes, i use it with friends and family all the time….works great and it’s a good way to safely exchange personal info if you so wish

    Reply
  137. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    My mind does dangerous things when left unattended!…lol.
    My lit prof. used to laugh his butt off reading some of my ramblings….i love to do it though..just born with too much imagination i suppose.
    IAN….hope you can give us something soon or i’m going to write a fantasy story about YOU next…..wink!!!

    Reply
  138. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    She felt the heat burning into her back . Slowly she raised her compact, opened it and positioned the mirror so she could see who or what was so intensely concentrating on her back. Her ocean blue/green eyes met the stare of a man wearing a spacesuit, and black cats eye sunglasses. Damn! she thought, now i can’t see into the depths of those eyes burning my flesh.
    Okay IAN…next step is you ….naked….
    Got anything for us yet?

    Reply
  139. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    HAHAHAhahahAHAHAhahahahaHAHAHAHhahahaHAHAHAHAHahaahaahaa

    Reply
  140. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Lol Ms Agatha, i tried…

    Reply
  141. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    Ahhh Patty Anne, if we could just make some stuff up and see if it gets reported to FF first , and then ….. and then …and then …. People ? And have Keane fighting off the avalanche of autographs requests ….

    Thanks for trying, I can see a great future for you ……. lol

    Reply
  142. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Why thank you, however, i think it’s probably a good thing IAN isn’t here right now, or i may find my arse locked out!…lol Just for him to know i was even thinking of him naked could get me banned lmao

    Reply
  143. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    Nothing wrong with a hot thought or two …… you would get applauded , not banned lol

    Reply
  144. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I agree though, we need something…. fast ….. or we get unruly lol

    Reply
  145. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Even the trolls are following their curfew ….. it’s That boring

    Reply
  146. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Very it seems.
    You know i’ve been thinking how strange it is that for all the news that was out there from/about Jolie/Pitt/Anniston for such a very long time, suddenly once the split rumours start….it all goes silent. Very weird i think. No photo ops of Angie wrapping up SALT and packing up to head to LA to be with Brad……No photo ops of Brad who has begun shooting his new film Moneyball…..and strangest of all to me…..photos everywhere of Gerard Butler shooting The Bounty Hunter in NYC….and nothing on Jennifer other than her award the other night. It’s definately not the norm for Brad and Angie to lay so low though…very strange.

    Reply
  147. unknownxcat said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Megan and Angie together ? Gulldarn, Im gettin a stiffy… and im a chick.

    Reply
  148. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    For that i am grateful. I don’t get why people have to expend such energy with hate….for anyone, anything. Someone here said it well, It’s like television, if you don’t like the program, change the channel. Seems so many trolls want US to change, which is like going to someone’s home and telling them not to put their feet on the coffee table…geesh!

    Reply
  149. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    @unknownxcat:
    Lmao….is that you Jenny Shimizu? Just kidding

    Reply
  150. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    Tomorrow AJ And Hillary Clinton will sit at the couch together with Anderson Cooper / CNN …. Hillary will leave her in the dust…..

    Reply
  151. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    Wow….Billy Joel is heading for his third divorce. Celebrities are too spoiled in my opinion. They don’t put nearly the effort into keeping a marriage going as they do in buying new cars, homes, etc…..such a shame

    Reply
  152. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    unless, Aj is her type ….. lol

    Reply
  153. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    I find it horrific that a HW celeb with barely HS education, and self serving motives can arrange to be seated besides the Secretary Of State of the United States in an interview as an equal. This idea is so beyond rediculous it’s idiotic imo. I hope Hilary comes on dressed all in black and acts vampish like nut-bag Jolie….I wonder why Jolie didn’t arrange for Ann Curry to do the interview….arghhhh

    Reply
  154. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 9:58 pm

    …and BP will sit down with Ellen DGeneres tomorrow, talking about housing projects…..

    Reply
  155. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Is that new, or a re-run?

    Reply
  156. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I completely agree, PA, do they have PM’s at FF? You are registered there Yes?

    Reply
  157. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    All for exposure , they are all media whores ….and AJ wants to be a public intellectual as well, wants to be taken seriously, wants gravitas by showing us faked concern, a morally bankrupt woman who can only stutter her confused train of thoughts ….

    Reply
  158. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    new… his 2nd sit-down w her

    Reply
  159. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    @Kate:
    sorry, my last post for you

    Reply
  160. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    @Kate:
    No, i never registered at FF in the year i was there as Gwenneth. I deleted the url from my bookmarks though, and don’t go there at all anymore. I seemed to have gotten along well with the other Brad and Angie posters there, in fact i’m the one who clued them in with the topic about Lefsitz…Jolie’s imaginary friend, but the IU Haters ruined it for me. I feel , for myself anyway, it’s not worth going there anymore , even though i liked several posters there, one in particular was great with info, Vj something, has an avatar of voodoo or something….So, Gwenneth left after posting one topic …. a warning to all about the long lasting and sometimes dangerous effects of Cyber Bullying….hope some read it and wake up to what it happening to their site.
    Whew! Didn’t mean to ramble on like this…. :-)

    Reply
  161. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    I wonder if he told her to keep her hands to herself this time. They both seem to be boosting their image.

    Reply
  162. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:16 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    I am hoping that when IAN’s expose’ on Brangelina comes out in October, many people will read it with open minds, and learn from it. It’s so easy for the masses to be led, rather than for them to do the work of thinking and researching for themselves to find the correct conclusion about a person’s so called humanitarian efforts….Bah Humbug Jolie!!

    Reply
  163. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    @Kate:
    I had read somewhere that Brad has had a clause put into his contracts for interviews that it’s strictly Hands To Yourself…or…no touchy , no feely now, or they could be open for a law suit…..Take That Ann!!

    Reply
  164. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    @Kate:
    lol …. and I wonder, if she gets him to dance …… awghhh….. lol … this will be all over YouTube for the next 10 years<

    Reply
  165. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    This book will be his bestselling EVER….. He may not know it yet …… but mark my words….. he is so into that circus guy right now – but he totally underestimates the impact his Brangelina book will have….

    Reply
  166. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    …because that woman who interviewed him in Cannes was all over his face …. stroking….

    Reply
  167. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    I totally agree with you on this. IAN has NO idea how huge this Brangelina book will be, or how many interviews will be requested of him for it. He will have the Loons out in force picketing, and the sane people will be asking valid questions. I can see it happening. Hope he puts lots of candid photos in the book, ones that not many have ever seen of them in akward positions…lol

    Reply
  168. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    There are a series of photos of Angelina while supposedly pregnant with the twins….one in particular shows her carrying Zahara and climbing up a hill…get this….with her so called pregnant belly slipped SIDEWAYS on her body!!!

    Reply
  169. Patty Anne said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    it’s been a late night for me here on EST, so i must say nity-nite to all. Thaks for the chat!

    Reply
  170. cb42 said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Brad’s Ellen appearance is a re-run. Ellen is on vacation right now. All her shows have been repeats this week.

    Reply
  171. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yeah…. this block, what is happening here… and the huge interest … pro and contra…. should give him an idea whats coming at him…… The Brange story is internationally huge…… the circus story for Canadians and Formula I fans …..

    Reply
  172. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I asked because I saw that post about the bully thread and someone said that was you so I wondered if you were over there still. I posted on the Hostility thread just to clear up some things, someone went on there and made up some things about me saying that, 1- I am and insider 2- that I m from one of the three camps 3- that I work for Ian 4- that if Keane knew who I really was she would attack me. Now none of that is true, and someone here told me it was on there and I was a bit surprised that someone would go to such lengths with the games to cause a problem just out of the hatred for this site. I wanted to clear that up, so I posted. Of course that did not go over well, I was not all that welcomed, but what I realized is that the ones who were the most negative towards me are the ones who are the most defensive of Angelina. We are talking about FF here, not Just Jared. I was accused of having hatred for her. Shaking my head, not even going to defend that anymore. I have already said numerous times I do not hate her and wish she could get her life together. Clearly there are some people on there that are pro Angelina that were here in the mix and are using their hatred for IUC to cause problems. I am sure there are those who are antis too that don’t like me or the site also but this was just something that was so clear to me well, because FF is famous for being anti Brangelina, and you would have thought I had spit in Mother Teresas face by suggesting Brad owed the public an apology for the way he has lied , to Larry King, to his fans. Sorry but that is what I believe and many that I know. It is interesting that now there is a mix of pro Brange and anti Brange on Female First. Never thought I would see that come to pass. There are some nice posters there, and bright ones too. It is not the whole board that is on attack mode, it is the ones that jsut hate IUC. Unfortunately.

    Reply
  173. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    nite… I am off too

    Reply
  174. Kate said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    It has been about a month since he has posted any reports on Brangelina. The last one was about Cannes, that the Sudanese was shacked up next door to Brad at Cannes, and that Angelina was doing drugs in the bathroom, right? That is the last one I remember , besides the pregnancy story that he demissed, nada since then. zip nothing. He said in the chat “I thought” that the book was coming out in about 13 weeks, did I misunderstand that? I wondered if he was pushing the book out earlier than October.

    Reply
  175. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 10:53 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate, your post is neither addressed to me, nor do I know what is or has been happening on that board over there nor here ….. but I would like to tell you , that I think you are a fine person who cannot do a fly wrong.
    You are hurt and this is not good. Be yourself, don’t change, do not pay attention to anything mediocre …absolutely not……don’t give in… don’t bother… just don’t … it is totally inconsequential to you, to all of us, to this blog …. You have become some sort of a cyber celebrity….. comes with the territory… if you were Mother Theresa herself ….. you would get attacked …. whatever is going on, has nothing to do with you personally…… I hope you forgive me putting in my 5 cents …. just hate to see you mulling…you are fine the way you are…. we need you here …

    Reply
  176. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    @Kate:
    also…. Who ever has you and Keane writing regularly ANYWHERE …… must be pinching themselves every nite…. I would pay you and Keane X amount of money ….. just to write for me ….you are drawing in the masses…. I think you may not even be aware what kind of celeb status you and Keane have gained in a short period of time……. you might as well accept it …lol

    Reply
  177. benjaminbutton14 said on June 17th, 2009 at 11:33 pm

    bb14. I asked a question on the other post but don’t think anybody is going back there. Can you tell me how come the paps know that Brad and Jen are hooking up and as it says in In Touch mag. that Brad was at Jens house. If they know all of this then how come there aren’t any pictures of them together. Beats me.

    Reply
  178. Ms Agatha said on June 17th, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:

    …they may have an informant disguised as a homeless person on her doorstep ( if he uses his Iphone, would draw attention) , maybe they have somebody with long lenses 1 mile across from her house leaning out of window….. Ergo: The press has their means to find out stuff, if BP gets there in the middle of the night and the guy with the camera is too far off = no PIC , or it’s an old-fashioned bugging operation… now, THAT would be interesting ….. the noises coming out of that house… lol

    Reply
  179. Finally said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:28 am

    @Kate:

    Why are you still whining about this. None of those people in that thread defended Angelina. Stop lying . You weren’t bashed some people actually agreed with you, some didn’t . Stop playing victim to all of this. Either post or just stop posting completely. It should NOT affect you like this. These people don’t know you, just like you don’t know them. Those people didn’t say anything hateful to you. When you couldn’t get your way you used the “Defend Angelina button”. You accused people of doing that when they hadn’t. Then that’s when all hell broke loose. You did that on purpose ,when not one post in that thread defended Angelina Jolie. How clever of you but, it showed you really are insecure and bitter as did you in your post last night. Even people who agreed with you on this board didn’t agree with your lunancy. I always said you were far more vicious than KeaNE. You proved me right.

    Reply
  180. mslewis said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:43 am

    @benjaminbutton14: Because it’s all made up. There are no pics of Brad and Jen at that hotel in NY; there are no pics of Brad and Jen in the car on Jen’s movie set; there are no pics of Brad at Jen’s house. How can there be since none of these things ever happen!!!

    One picture of Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston together would sell for a million dollars!! EVERYBODY has a cell phone with a camera. Why are there no pictures?? BECAUSE NO MEETING BETWEEN BRAD AND JEN HAS EVER TAKEN PLACE AND WILL NEVER TAKE PLACE!!!

    But, alas, the lies sell magazines and keeps the haters believing what they want to believe.

    Reply
  181. Kermit Roosevelt Jr. said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:47 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Twitter’s our data mining and provateuring front. We’re using Twitter to get rid of Ahmadinejad just like we got rid of Mossadeq in 1953 with phony baloney propaganda and psych-war. Get ready for Shah 2.0.

    Reply
  182. Kate said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    @Finally:
    I have no idea what you are talking about. 1- I never said I was bashed nor did I say any was hateful to me, try reading again if you did not understand. I said it was not welcomed, and I meant by the ones who yes mamn do very cleary defend Brange. In fact those posters are the ones who were bashed for calling me out because they agreed with me, FF is a anti Brange board by reputation, not a let’s be mutual girls as SZ suggessted in her very nicely written essay. If anyone is whining it is you, I am not hurt about anything, I was clearing up incorrect info the same way SZ does when she comes here. I don’t believe you are a moderator at FF or here so don’t give me instructions on how to post, when, where, and how. Last, I normally would not bother responding to such a negative and nasty poster but since you called me a liar I felt I should, and before you make accusations you should have at least thought about it for two seconds before you flew over here in your little temper tantrum- because I can easily copy and paste at least a handful of posts on there responding to what I wrote that defended poor Angie and, oh pleasaaaseeee leave her alone, okay?

    Do I care what you think of me? Hmmm let me think

    NO

    ps. ms agatha sweet of non Lol Not hurt upset at all if you read the thread it was read a nice exchange. But thank you!

    Reply
  183. keane cyber queen supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Am glad u bothered to post the 3 negative comments towards what I was saying on that thread and not the 20-30 or so ones who liled what to say and supported me against miffed_33’s attack. You are clutching at straws now aren’t you?

    Reply
  184. keane cyber queen supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:29 am

    @ Curious Catz – ha ha ha!!!!!!!! It didn’t get enough attention on the other thread so u went 4a repost on this one how funny! You are SO right BTW, there has only ever been 1 person in the history of oxford’s existence who trained as an actor & dancer & studied there, just one. There has never been anyone else EVER! After that 1 person you mentioned got her place they excluded anyone else with acting or dancing training to ever study there ever again!!! That’s how they keep it exclusive yano! Jesus weptis this the best you can do?! That & the poxy cut & paste from dlisted? You are useless. I’ve already said how many other actors & dancers there were at college while I was there, yano the famous ones for example? Good lord if it had a brain it would be dangerous.

    Reply
  185. Finally said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Clutchin for what ? I am not the one who posted the link to miffed putting you in your place.

    Kate your a whiner grow up. No one was defending Angelina on that thread. Link to post where people were defendin her? If they were is that against the law or something? But, clearly that was not the case in that thread and I thought it was childish of you to try to cause rukkus because no one agreed with you. The only thing that happened was Anti’s came in looking for Wooly. A poster’s comment stated something to the effect that Angelina has been bashed more than Jen. That’s defending her? I wasn’t the one who made that comment but, I noticed nobody was talking about Angelina it was you who brought her up. You say you weren’t welcomed but, I saw some posters being polite and welcoming you. My point is your lying and your whining. If you wanted to take SZ’s to heart then you wouldn’t come over here lying would you? You would have dropped it right? No again, you like to play victim on a regular. What hurt your feeling so much ? That nobody felt that Brad pitt needed to publically apologize after 5 years later to Jen when she’s moved on with her life he with is? That’s defending Jolie? I didn’t take any of what everyone was stating as such. Even posters who normally would agree did not. You don’t respect agree to disagree very well. I urge you to call me bluff and pull out post upon post of blatant Angelina Jolie defending. Most people are in the middle or don’t care for her much but, either way its your actions showing you as a very bitter ole soul. You claim to be over it I read your post your not. Nothing new on the site so go over to FF not to post in the other threads but, to shit stir.

    Reply
  186. Gueswho said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    Clearly there are some people on there that are pro Angelina that were here in the mix and are using their hatred for IUC to cause problems. I am sure there are those who are antis too that don’t like me or the site also but this was just something that was so clear to me well, because FF is famous for being anti Brangelina, and you would have thought I had spit in Mother Teresas face by suggesting Brad owed the public an apology for the way he has lied , to Larry King, to his fans. Sorry but that is what I believe and many that I know. It is interesting that now there is a mix of pro Brange and anti Brange on Female First.

    A deluded one speaks. Like people can’t be pro or anti in the real world. Time you grew past you obsession with Brad and Jennifer and your frightening hate for Jolie. It’s starting to delude your acutal thinking for the real world. There is life outside of them all. Perhaps, you mistake anyone that doesn’t call another woman deragatory names as defense of her.
    I will be glad when this blog gets shut down if only to shut you up so you can come over to FF and we can discuss and bring up our cached post of you going on in the rape thread that stunned most of us. The dog story etc..

    Reply
  187. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:47 am

    @Patty Anne:
    That was hysterical Patty Anne! :P

    Reply
  188. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:51 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Go for it Patty Anne – I bet it would be very funny! :D

    Reply
  189. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:53 am

    @unknownxcat:
    Hey, “gulldarn” – that’s my word! Ha ha :P

    Reply
  190. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    @Kate:
    Yes, i completely understand what you are saying. Seems there are IUC Haters on the IU Hostility board who still come here to search for anything they can twist to take back and fan the fire of hate over there. I honestly do not believe they are gaining numbers with the real FF posters though. So many i blogged with this past year were truly decent people who just dislike Angie Jo and Braddy PittY for all their falsehoods, etc. I was active in posting topics on all the list re AJ and BP, but when this IU Hostility board came about …. begun i believe by one or perhaps two who felt they couldn’t get along here… it soured the entire thing for me. So, to give FF a chance to avoid any bad feedback from someone who just finds that site, and sees all the hate, bullying, etc. on that board related to another board complete with the admitted FF bloggers running here and returning to insult, rip apart those posting on another board, well, it’s so immature, Bullish, and plain Bad Manners…. I researched what they do to us here, Cyber Bullying and ccp the url to a topin for them to consider honestly amoung themselves what they are doing. I reminded them that the face behind the little letters on their monitors could very well be their child’s teacher, their next door neighbor, their son’s g/f, a relative….and would they want to be known by the way they act here?…..then i toatally deleted my FF urls, and bookmarks and i will never return to that site. I did see a funny comment made by a True FF poster though, told one bully to cut it out, that FF is not intended to be IUC junior!….lol

    Reply
  191. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:55 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    And I just saw the news that Ms. Clinton has a broken elbow – wow, what were she, evil Ms. Jolie and Kill-Bill Clinton doing last night! (Patty Anne, the stage is set for your imaginative wonderings!) :P

    Reply
  192. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    @Patty Anne:
    That probably only applies to the “public viewing” part of the interview – the hapless Mr. Pitt probably takes advantage of any and all situations involving willing partners! :P

    Reply
  193. keane cyber queen supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    @ Kate – don’t let the freaks get you down my friend, remember it matters not what people who you neither like or respect think about you. In fact it would probably be worse if they did like you, you’d really be doing something wrong! That’s what I find so hysterical about these losers, they genuinely think it would matter to us what they think of us, that we would WANT them to like us. I mean, how delusional can you be, we’re not even aware of their existence! You & I have always been here for the same reason: our own amusement. And if anyone else finds anything we say interesting & we pick up a few cyber friends along the way then all to the good. Contrary to popular opinion neither of us have ever been here to gain a following or win a popularity contest, which is why I think it is funny that these people assume their opinion on us matters one iota! It is honestly genuinely hysterical to me & I can but laugh! So worry not & remember none of these people actually know you, they don’t have the first idea who you really are. So how do you want to PM?x

    Reply
  194. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    @Kate:
    Kate – you are an intrinsically good person who sees the good in all people (and is an inspiration to me who usually sees the dark side of all people) and we here love you for it and are very glad you have returned to us! :D :P

    Reply
  195. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 9:12 am

    Ladies and Gents, we all need to put this FF IUC Haters Bullying where it belongs in the greater scheme of our lives….in File #13…the trash. Can they harm us? NO Do we depend upon them for our survival? NO Do we give a rat’s ass what they think about us personally? HELL NO! So, now it’s in perspective. They only have power over us if we allow them to …and i refuse to allow it. It’s gone beyond agreeing to disagree, it’s out right FF posters IUC bullying, but, the very person’s dragging down FF Site’s reputation and branding some FFer’s as Bullys are the very ones who are throwing temper tantrums because they could not make, yes MAKE, us agree with their take on the subject. So where is this honorable Agree To Disagree? They haven’t shown it one bit. Ergo….i choose to put them where they belong in the great scheme of my life….File #13…the trash! I will scan over posts, totally ignore any from the FF Bully’s, and go on to chat respectfully with other friendly and respectful posters here. One has to pity people who find the most important thing in their lives is to run back and forth between blog sites stirring up trouble for “entertainment?”….whatever!

    Reply
  196. FF poster said on June 18th, 2009 at 9:15 am

    @Patty Anne:

    Exactly so why are you not practicing what you preach? There are us regular FF posters who didn’t care much for Ian’s stories. I didn’t see many who showed appreciation and praise for beastiality,incest,child molestion, and rape. So, if women can at least agree on FF that these stories are ridiculous and appalling then, I am here to stay @ FF. The hate filled sentiments Kate’s speaks are nothing compared to what happens here on a regular. Regular posters like myself and others don’t agree with most of the hate filled sentinments either. If Loons come in daily that’s to be aspected given the topics of our discussion but, it does not stop us for positng. To continue going over to FF ,posting under guest etc.. Is inmature and wreaks of insecurity. If those IUC posters that you speak of aren’t posting here anymore then, why are you yourselves watching the thread like hawks? So what, they don’t like IUC. This isn’t bullying but, I have seen plenty of it on this site by the very people here acting innocent and all to willing to play that handy victim card. You all still have a following take pride in that and stay off of FF if you find that one thread offensive. I can’t speak for everyone posting at FF but, to try and divide the site also wreaks very much like troll like behavior.

    Reply
  197. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    @ladybert62:

    …Hope not from self-defending ellbow pushes to keep AJ off her ….lol

    Reply
  198. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    That’s a funny image Ms. Agatha! :P

    Reply
  199. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 9:29 am

    @ladybert62:

    …haha … when AJ rattles them bones ….. lol

    Reply
  200. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 10:00 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    Ain’t that the truth! AJ is so anorexic appearing these days, that i wonder how anyone can refer to her as a sex symbol
    BTW…i glanced over FF Poster and chose to ignore it, as just by the nickname i know they proved me right on my earlier posting about Bullies coming here to stir up chyt then running back to IUC Junior (FF) to stir up shit….go baby, i didn’t read one word!!

    Reply
  201. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Anderson Cooper was an intern with the CIA. AJ is their latest globalist tool as you will notice how the “media” (meaning government controlled TV news) is forcefeeding us with her goodness. This interview is nothing but a showcase for AJ to elevate her politically. Count on that. There IS NO FREE PRESS in this country. Whether Hilary shows or not, count on this interview as being mucho positive for AJ to the unwashed sheeple. And if HC does show up, she is a pros pro. She will do her part. What makes anyone think that we still have a free press in this country? Or a free country for that matter?

    Reply
  202. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    @Kermit Roosevelt Jr.:
    Absolutely on target about how the govt is using Twitter as propaganda to overthrow the Persians. AGAIN.

    Reply
  203. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 10:08 am

    @Constant Gardner:

    Just heard on the news, that HC is pulling out of the event, due to elbow injury. She is putting some distance between herself and pseudo-politician AJ …..

    Reply
  204. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    Great. Clears the way for an AC/AJ infomercial. And that is what it will be.

    Reply
  205. Sunny said on June 18th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    Enjoy

    Reply
  206. too curious said on June 18th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    When I first read of HC’s elbow being broken in a fall, I thought, “Wow, the lengths she would go to avoid having to be in public with AJ” You go, Hillary!!” Ok, I’m being snarky, but I think it is terrible that Hillary fell and broker her elbow, requiring surgery, but great that she won’t be appearing with AJ. I respect HC and I don’t respect AJ.

    Reply
  207. Sunny said on June 18th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    It didn’t work. Go to you tube and put in “top 60 ghetto names”

    Reply
  208. mia said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:

    “You & I have always been here for the same reason: our own amusement”…..

    So Keane you amuse yourself with stories about rape and child molestation? At least your statement showed your true character if nothing else!

    Reply
  209. backalleyknees said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    @mia:
    Jesus mia, give it a rest.

    Reply
  210. backalleyknees said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    @mia:
    I know you appointed yourself this site’s reason savior or whatever, but seriously?

    Reply
  211. Tamara said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    I think it’s interesting that Anderson Cooper is a Vanderbilt, son of Little Gloria, the subject of the most sensational child custody battle in history! LOL Just a tid bit for you since there’s nothing else to chew on! hahaha

    Reply
  212. d said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    Angie’s in DC with Maddox and Pax……..

    Reply
  213. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    No worries. I heartily believe it is a propaganda tool. This time last year, Americans were all about BOMB IRAN. Now there is all this faux concern for the “Iranian People”. Give me a break. If it comes from the news on the TV it is propaganda in my opinion.

    Reply
  214. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    @Tamara:
    That is interesting Tamara – I had no idea. Thanks for sharing that tidbit! :P

    Reply
  215. Kate said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, we need a trash bin, lol. I recognize some of the names from our member list here just from reading at different sites as to who are the staunch defenders of Angelina. Now does this not sound like one is defending Miss Ang-
    1-
    I agree and I have never tried to silence any criticism of her.Other than the IUC stories. I guess I feel she shouldn’t be blamed for everything Brad Pitt does or says. Other than that. I’m happy to chime in and snark.

    2-This person seem to understand what was going on-

    This isn’t f-u-c-k-in Keane. There’s a f-u-ckin loon here saying

    “So don`t act as if Jolie got away with anything: fact is that never in the history of hollywood has ANYONE ever faced such intense criticism as she did and still does!”

    Give me a break. People wake up. A loon using this thread to defend Jolie and say she’s the one who’s received the most intense criticism in the history of Hollywood. WTF? Is this FF I’m on or JJ

    3-Another defender-

    You are right Kate far too many actors get away with cheating without it being much of an issue other than a short mention on a gossip blog. The same CANNOT be said about Jolie who has been attacked for 5 YEARS now on a daily basis on the internet! And I am not even talking about the defamation campaign that Ian has started including the most insane claims imaginable which YOU Kate supported by the way! You and your buddy Keane. So don`t act as if Jolie got away with anything: fact is that never in the history of hollywood has ANYONE ever faced such intense criticism as she did and still does!
    And would you please stop freaking out about the W pictures. They were a publicity tool for the movie Mr & Mrs Smith and should symbolize the downfall of a marriage that only looks good on the outside – pretty much the theme of the movie. By the way the W pix were shot in March and Jen and Pitt split in early Jan. 2005. So there realtionship was already over! By the way what about the blank and white pix of Jen and her costar Vince Vaughn? Pitt could have the same reason to be jelous as his exwife.
    And please do us a favour and don`t mix Jen `s life with your own! It was her divorce and her hurt feelings not YOURS – and SHE moved on a VERY long time ago – something that obviously can`t be said of YOU!

    4-Someone understands what I meant- (thank you)

    What is your beef with Kate? She isn’t saying anything that many anti’s have said for years.

    You are defending an affair as “whatever” and the public humiliation of a wife as “no biggie.” That’s your right but most here don’t see it that way which is a perfectly legit position to take if you have any morals.

    And please stop with the “poor Angie” BS, too. Within minutes of going public with Pitt she was hailed the Queen of all things Beautiful and Hollywood. THAT is what irks people. That her deceptive behaviour was richly rewarded with more fame, sainthood, and tons of money. She has in no way suffered for her behaviour.

    And how did that happen? Media Manipulation pure and simple. And if that manipulation had only garnered them millions of loon fans, well, whatever, most people wouldn’t bat an eyelash. But it seems to have garnered them a free pass on adopting kids, on neglecting their kids basic need for stability, home, schooling, a free pass on smearing the ex wife, a free pass on exploiting wars and the underpriviledged for more press, etc etc etc. Really, I could go on all day.

    I could care less if they stay together or are apart. I don’t wish harm on either of them nor do I hate them. I do hate the cult of celebrity, of which they are the king and queen, which allows the rich and famous to indulge their every selfish need, pillage the coffers for untold wealth, lecture the little people on how to live, influence politicians, and escape any and all consequences for their immoral and/or selfish lifestyles. To put it simply, they are self serving narcissists who trick the public in order to stay on top.

    That is what should be exposed. Lift the veil people! Hollywood is not your friend.

    5-This person does get that they are at FF-
    You are not allowed to defend Angelina here. Even if it’s basic common sense. You could very well be right But, it will be seen as defending SkanKHO. I don’t care for Brangelina and their over exposed asses but, I have never seen anyone not even Bint,fishsticks,Madge or JLO bashed like Angelina. The bile holds no bounds when it comes to her. So, if your gonna post, just be prepared.

    And another honest person unlike Finally who has a reading comprehension problem if she believes no one over there has been a defender of Angelina , they are , because they have mistakely thought that they common dislike for anything of or to do with this site meant it was alright-

    That may be true, but I am not one of them.

    I support the skepticism of Ian and his “sources,” but some here are using it as a springboard to defend the Brange and bash anyone who is not a fan.

    It’s transparant.
    my comments below-

    Yes it is transparent, and this is the problem we had here, people coming here calling us haters , jealous, those ae the ones who support Angelina, the ones in the very beginning way back early February are who I refer to. Some have continued and it is easy to see who they are. I have never spoken hate filled words for any fellow poster, not sure where Finally is getting that, nor do I hate Brange, I have said postitive things about them both, at times, on certain subjects.

    Note to Finally, if you think I am obsessed, surf on back over to JJ and entertain yourself with some of the creative writing the girls do there. Otherwise you asked me to take your challenge, I did not come seek you out, and btw my post was not to all of FF it was to just a few, so not sure why you have interjected yourself. I was clearing up info to those I knew. Feel free to run over and copy and paste this again as you did before, and throw another temper tantrum here, but I will not respond to again, as I don’t know you and have no idea why you have put yourself in the middle of this. Must not be to scared, whatever that is about.

    I could care less if they stay together or are apart. I don’t wish harm on either of them nor do I hate them. I do hate the cult of celebrity, of which they are the king and queen, which allows the rich and famous to indulge their every selfish need, pillage the coffers for untold wealth, lecture the little people on how to live, influence politicians, and escape any and all consequences for their immoral and/or selfish lifestyles. To put it simply, they are self serving narcissists who trick the public in order to stay on top.

    That is what should be exposed. Lift the veil people! Hollywood is not your friend.

    You are defending an affair as “whatever” and the public humiliation of a wife as “no biggie.” That’s your right but most here don’t see it that way which is a perfectly legit position to take if you have any morals.

    And please stop with the “poor Angie” BS, too. Within minutes of going public with Pitt she was hailed the Queen of all things Beautiful and Hollywood. THAT is what irks people. That her deceptive behaviour was richly rewarded with more fame, sainthood, and tons of money. She has in no way suffered for her behaviour.

    And how did that happen? Media Manipulation pure and simple. And if that manipulation had only garnered them millions of loon fans, well, whatever, most people wouldn’t bat an eyelash. But it seems to have garnered them a free pass on adopting kids, on neglecting their kids basic need for stability, home, schooling, a free pass on smearing the ex wife, a free pass on exploiting wars and the underpriviledged for more press, etc etc etc. Really, I could go on all day.

    I could care less if they stay together or are apart. I don’t wish harm on either of them nor do I hate them. I do hate the cult of celebrity, of which they are the king and queen, which allows the rich and famous to indulge their every selfish need, pillage the coffers for untold wealth, lecture the little people on how to live, influence politicians, and escape any and all consequences for their immoral and/or selfish lifestyles. To put it simply, they are self serving narcissists who trick the public in order to stay on top.

    That is what should be exposed. Lift the veil people! Hollywood is not your friend.

    Reply
  216. Kate said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @keane cyber queen supreme:
    Do you have PM capabilities somewhere else?

    Reply
  217. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    Reports now say Hilary Clinton is to have surgery on her broken elbow. Maybe she will let Angelina stand in for her?….lol

    Reply
  218. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Well, i feel that as long as we have the freedom to come on a global internet and voice our personal opinions in a non hostile, agressive manner, we do still have freedom. Things are not as good in our nation as we are used to, and we, as a whole, need to do our individual part to correct this. That includes keeping up on where our politician stand on an issue, how they perform in government for our wishes, and how they keep promises that got them elected. If they let us down, each of us can establish a group to hold them accountable, see to it they know we are dissatisfied, and can affect the outcome next election….It’s not perfect, but it beats what else i have seen

    Reply
  219. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    @d:
    Her two favorites….

    Reply
  220. Different Guest said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @Patty Anne:I thought Mad and Z were her favorites. She probably sees the girls as competition.

    Kate and Keane – E!Online message board has pm capabilities, it is slow as molasses.

    Reply
  221. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    With the way Angelina Jolie has manipulated the press, and the people who follow her so blindly, i am grateful for one thing…she isn’t running for President of the U.S. or we’d all be sure she is the Anti-Christ….. being slightly facetious here, but…i repeat but….this woman has power beyond anyone’s imagination, and for what? Busy twat? How can she go so quickly from laughed at by HW, Queen of the Dark, knife cutting, heroin using, illegally adopting , husband stealing, whore….to Mother Theresa in such a shot time? Money alone could not do this, there has to be more to this….IAN, you listening? I’ll send you money to buy a huge shovel if you dig into Angelina Jolie Rise To Power….. like certain other historic characters.

    Reply
  222. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    @Kate:

    No, I don’t know where we could do that, I’m sure there must be somewhere. Maybe someone can fill us in if so. BTW this FF thing, who really cares to be honest. I honestly couldn’t give an FF! I’ve never read there or posted there or ever will. Its not even a gossip blog. I understand it must be a bit different for you as you used to post there and were friendly with some people but at the end of the day right-thinking people will make up their own mind and not be swayed by a bunch of psycho bullies. So let’s just leave them to play by themselves shall we? Let’s face it, they haven’t got anything better to do! Although I have to say I thought “Finally”’s comment about being “put in my place” on Dlisted was pretty hilarious considering the vast majority of the posters there all responded to her in support of me. The whole thread became about me (the start of the nonsense to come!) and it went on for about 24 hours. The vast majority of people appreciated what I had to say and liked to hear the stories from IUC at the time. But like the whole “walk away” nonsense, it just goes to show that people will believe what they want to believe if it is attacking the person they have a vendetta against. And they accuse us of being “out to get” Angelina, hilarious! There is so much pot and kettle behaviour it is ridiculous. Anyway, let them go, they only get their knickers in a twist because they haven’t got anything better to talk about or do. Their bitterness will give them all an ulcer any day soon now and then maybe they’ll rethink their actions!

    Reply
  223. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Funny thing, i used to think that also, until i began to notice that Zahara seemed to be the one Brad favored. When Angie isn’t trying to suck up to Braddy, she shows her true colors, and to me, she’s all about the Boyzzzzzzz….

    Reply
  224. Kate said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    no, I never posted there, I only know the ones from here that went there..I have read there though off and on.

    Reply
  225. Different Guest said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @Kate:Don’t know if you saw my comment above, go to E!Online.com and register for their boards (use a disposable email adress) they have pm capabilities – just takes forever to load, sounds like you’d only need to use it once anyway.

    Reply
  226. Different Guest said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:Lends credence to rumors that all is not right with the girls, because we haven’t seen them with Brad much either.

    Reply
  227. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    @Different Guest:
    True. Shiloh always seems either angry , or extremely shy. Zahara seems violent toward Shiloh, and in some way, not the norm. Pax is just in it for the ride, he appears to have no idea that this is his permanent homelife, and Mad, well Maddox always wil be Angie’s true baby, her one love. The twins? aka the new blobs. What a disfunctional family!! I read today in two different papers that Brad is telling that he and Angie have agreed to a “long separation”…..is that Bradspeak for …it’s over?

    Reply
  228. Different Guest said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:long=permanent in Bradspeak

    Reply
  229. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    I am going to try to watch the AJ ‘ show ‘ tonight ….. but need to get my prescription anti-vomiting medication first …… just learning that AC won’t be there either ! Everybody is outta here ! It’s AJ all by herself on stage ? ( Taking 2 pills )……..

    Reply
  230. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    That’s odd, the attitude to the role of Twitter in the Iranian elections in the UK could not be more different. And I’m pleased to say we do still have a free press thank God, not the newspapers necessarily (although the opposing political biases do balance out) but broadcast news for sure. Especially the BBC and Channel 4 news. If you are a news junkie you may enjoy watching it on line. Its focus is very international, it covers a lot of stories the other channels don’t pick up and has a very intelligent, incisive presenter/commentes in the form fo Jon Snow. Its on for an hour every night as well, apart from Friday-Sunday which I think is half an hour.

    The UK news very much considers the camera phone/video recorder and twitter as vital tools in resisting rigged elections. Western journos have been banished now so the only pics and evidence we’re getting are from the individual eye witness accounts spread on the internet. If it wasn’t for this technology the Iranian govt would be able to silence reportage of the protests in the world wide media. It can only be a positive thing. People are angry that they are being told that Ahmadinejad has won 2 out of 3 votes cast in the election, a supposed landslide victory. If the election has been rigged then surely the worldwide coverage of the protests is vital to put pressure on the govt? I don’t understand why you think it is Iranian propaganda, can you explain?

    I for one would rejoice at Ahmadinejad being deposed from power, considering the lack of human rights of the Iranian people and the conditions under which they are forced to live. A less hardline, more progressive leader can only be a good thing right? And maybe Mousavi is not the living incarnation of freedom and democratic govt, but he must be an improvement on what they have now otherwise people would not feel so strongly. The stuff that goes on in Iran with regard to what is punishable by law and the methods of punishment are truly repellant, its as bad as Taliban-governed Afghanistan. If you’re interested and I can find it I’ll link you to the site of the organisation I mentioned before. Iranian Youth Association or something I think it was called. All the members had a lost a relative to the govt’s shady crime and punishment system. Many do not know what has happened to them. You may know all this stuff already anyway, but I just thought I’d explain where I’m coming from in terms of Iran. For me any resistance to dictatorship, Ahmadinejad and the current political regime cannot be anything but a good thing!

    Reply
  231. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    My tinfoil hat is always on! Twitter didn’t happen by accident. They have been pimping it on CNN for months. That is my first clue that it is a tool for propaganda as CNN is one of the worst for propaganda although the others are equally appalling. So when the tinfoil hatters on the interwebs talk about 911 conspiracies etc they/we are nutbags. But when MSM can co opt something like Twitter to use for their own propaganda, the internet is a good thing. It has already been established that the 3 most prolific “twitterers” or TWATS, LOL twittering about Iran are based in Israel. Now why would Israel (and the US for that matter) the two biggest warmongers toward Iran want to assist in destabilizing their govt? Now do you see why the MSM is telling you that “the revolution will be on Twitter?”

    Reply
  232. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Patty Anne, that was hilarious! Telling it like it is, ha ha ha! BTW I think the long and short of why Ange gets these spots is pretty simple: she sells. More people will tune in to see her than would ever tune in to see HIlls, which is a shame but that’s life. The broadcaster is using her for ratings and I assumed HC was using her for popular appeal until I heard she’d pulled out. I think people are getting a little wary of the Angelina association these days (wasn’t Obama ordered not to involve her in his campaign too?). Ange is of course using them both right back though, in a typical drive for self-promotion and “positioning herself”. I doubt she will achieve it though. I think she may need to up her game by about a 1000% to take a short-cut to Queendom in Washington the way she did HW. You need slightly more than good looks and purdy children to succeed in that field I would hope.

    Reply
  233. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    IMO, Angie is scrambling now that Brad has come more or less into the open about their agreed upon “long separation”. She knows there are many comments about how he is behaving like a man just released from prison, so she has to make it more about her, in order to not look like the dumpee but to try to look as if she’d “outgrown” immature Brad. Yano, sort of Look At Me! I’m a working mom of six, i am involved in humanitarian efforts, and i find time for politics to aid the masses of the world! While Brad rides off into the night holding tight to his beer bottle and singing Kumbayah

    Reply
  234. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    Just saw PiCS OF AJ attending the National Geographic Society as a Goodwill Ambassador today in Washington D.C. ….. she has changed her hair color to JA’s ! Not a good look for her , does this mean Fox is going blonde now too ?

    Reply
  235. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    That’s an interesting perspective, and never be afraid to don your tinfoil hat, it is what we love you for! And yeah I can certainly see what Israel and the US would stand to gain from all this. But do you really think Twitter is crucial to all that? There is support for Mousavi on other social networking etc sites. It just seems like the focus at the moment is twitter. Do you believe the 9/11 conspiracy theories BTW? Because from what I’ve read/seen I definitely don’t. And as for Iran, well from what I’ve heard from Iranians in London campaigning for human rights in their home land, I would say that I support the overthrow of Ahmadinejad no matter who is inciting it. Considering what is going on there it can only be a positive thing. If I can remember/find this organisation I’ll link you to it. The photos/video/stories are beyond shocking, they are truly disturbing.

    Reply
  236. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    You’re so right there, her PR machinations are getting more and more desperate at the moment. While Brad seems to have stopped giving an eff and is rejoicing in his new found freedom, ha ha!

    Reply
  237. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    @Kate:

    You want to try PM on eonline then?

    Reply
  238. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    What? Are you serious? Evil Ms. Jolie has gone blonde? I have to see this one …. :P

    Reply
  239. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Thanks for the tip Different Guest BTW!x

    Reply
  240. Tamara said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Keane and Kate, its none of my biz, but go to: http://www.247chat.net. Its a general chat room cafe and once you log on with a nickname you can then start pm’ing each other and have a private convo. There is no registration or personal information req’d to enter the room so its all pretty basic. Good Luck!

    Reply
  241. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    @ladybert62:

    brown-blonde-lots of streaks —- kinda like JA …… it run on CNN …. she was sitting under lots of camera light … did not look her best at all…. black pants… black V-neck sweater …. haggard look…

    Reply
  242. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Iran is a highly sophisticated society. The problem is that various interpretations of Islam have impacts on the people and especially women. Many Muslim women have no objection to wearing the hijab and other female related requirements of Islam. You can be sure, they are rocking out the Gucci under their veils. Many of them understand the real context of Islam and Women and not the propagandized version we are told about on TV.

    HOWEVER we should never become blind to the likelihood that our own govt is meddling in Iran’s internal affairs and therefore playing with the lives of these protesters. You can take it to the bank that they are. NEVER LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE. The US set that precedent by overthrowing the Iranian govt in 1953.

    I am very sorry to disagree so strongly with you but I do believe that we all have a tendency to be naive about the media including the BBC News which I watch and enjoy daily. The one thing I will give to the Beeb is that at least they tell a larger story and they do tend to do real news and not the pablum that we get on US network TV. But to think that the BBC is not aligned with certain government and corporate interests is dangerous. It was the BBC who reported the demolition of WTC 7 BEFORE IT HAPPENED AND WITH THE INTACT BUILDING IN THE BACKGROUND OF THE REPORTER. There is only one free press and that is people on the internet, albeit you may have to search for the truth on the internet but at least it is out there. Free of government and corporate interests. That is why I am convinced that the internet as we know it today will become so regulated with bullshit stuff like hate crimes for the internet, child pron, etc. all for our own good doncha know eg. reign in the internet under the guise of hate crimes and child pron. Just sit back and watch. I will make you a friendly wager. All is not as it seems and ALL GOVERNMENTS LIE, ALL GOVERNMENTS HURT THEIR OWN PEOPLE. The press assists in these endeavors. The world media is owned by a conglomerate of a handful of globalist, corporatist types. That alone should tell us that the press is not free. No, indeed it is not. It is owned and it is for profit. And when the “news” is for profit then by definition it cannot be unencumbered by govt and corp interests and it is not free. That felt good. I need a cigarette, LOL.

    Reply
  243. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    Keane:

    You are probably already in bed and will miss my righteous rant, dammit!

    Reply
  244. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    And I just forgot to point out to Finally, as she obviously has (like so many other trolls on this site) a greatly inflated sense of her own significance – no I most definitely was not talking to you dumbass – DUH!

    Reply
  245. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    omg she looks like a deranged Mary Poppins!

    Reply
  246. Tamara said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Madame Tussaud called, she wants her wax back!!!

    Reply
  247. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Here is a timely article about the state of the free press and propaganda in the west:

    Excerpt:

    The era of brave reporters and determined editors seems to be over. Correspondents who covered the Vietnam War, who actually helped to stop the Vietnam War, are getting older. They write memoirs and publish books, but they hardly witness today’s conflicts. There are still some fearless and dedicated journalists – Keith Harmon Snow or John Pilger to mention just two – but they are more exceptions that prove the rule than a common occurrence.

    And yet brave alternative voices are needed more now than in any other time in recent history. As corporate control over the media becomes nearly complete, almost all large outlets now serve establishment economic and political interests. The more they do, the more they talk about the need for freedom of the press, objectivity, and unbiased reporting; somewhere else, not at home.

    While most of the English language media is exercising an unprecedented suppression of information about, for instance, the brutality of Western foreign policy in sub-Saharan Africa or about the ongoing Indonesian genocide in West Papua (two parts of the world with tremendous raw material wealth exploited by multi-national mining companies), establishment media outlets in the United States, UK, and Australia intensify their attacks against alternative points of views coming from Beijing (PRC), Caracas, or Havana. The more complete the grip on power by market fundamentalists, the more anti-Chinese or anti-Chavez rhetoric appears on the channels of Western mass media – channels whose propaganda now reaches basically every corner of the globe.

    Linky: The World Cannot be Changed Without Fighting Western Propaganda
    http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/21731

    Reply
  248. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    …. a very desperate Mary Poppins…. ahhh Mother Theresa…..

    Reply
  249. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @Tamara:

    ROFL ……. so sadly funny …..

    Reply
  250. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    …and here is PIC of BP all alone in Los Angeles yesterday or today ……

    http://www.wenn.com/archives/7753#respond

    Reply
  251. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Don’t worry I am still here! Well yes I have to say we do completely disagree with each other here. I know about what you’re referring to with regard to the BBC reporting of the collapse of WTC 7 but I have seen a doc on the 9/11 conspiracy theory that pretty categorically debunked that piece of evidence and most of the others too. I can’t remember the precise circumstances of it but they interviewed the BBC news team involved, including the reporter, and the reason for it was something very simple and difficult to dispute. This was a doc on Sky so it was definitely not a cover-up on the part of the BBC. Murdoch will try to attack, discredit or stitch the beeb up at any possible opportunity believe me (the recent Russell Brand/Jonathan Ross debacle in the UK for example – not sure if you know of it – is widely believed in media circles to have been incited by the Murdoch press as an attack on the most hated, biggest rival to his business), so it was more likely to be against them if anything. I had an open mind when I saw the doc because I didn’t know much about it pretty much debunked all of the theorist’s arguments and was a very balanced, fair account of it all. I’ll try to remember what it was called if you’re interested. BTW having worked for the BBC I can definitely attest that it is not controlled by business or govt. It is paid for by the public and accountable to it. Having made a programme for them which had some very controversial subject-matter in it (with regard to a big cover up of the role of the police in an event that caused the death of a lot of people), I can attest that there was no interference with what the P/D and I were doing at all. In fact some more input, guidance and/or help would have been greatly appreciated but we were pretty much left to our own devices by our absentee Exec! But I will concede that BBC news is not always the greatest, it is very UK focused on the whole and does not ask the difficult questions that the Channel 4 news does. Check it out, I’m sure you will much prefer it, it certainly covers a lot more of the international stories you’re interested in than the Beeb does (though BBC News 24 is better).

    As for Iran well I agree that a lot of Iranians are very westernized which is why it is so dreadful for them to live in a society where a couple holding hands in public is punishable by law, where having gay sex or sex outside marriage is punishable by death (either stoning or hanging), and where opponents to the political regime are rounded up, abducted and never seen again. Did you know Iran is second only to China in the number of executions it commits every year? So again, yes I am very happy that the people of Iran are rising up against their govt and seeking to depose a dangerous man and a brutal, evil regime, regardless of whether they are being aided or abetted by any other foreign govt. All I want is for those people to be free from the tyranny of their own govt.

    Reply
  252. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    I think she’s done that because the black was exposing how worn out she’s looking. Lighter hair is less harsh and more flattering to maturer skins, and hers really has matured! Plus I think she’s trying to look friendlier and less like the “evil Disney Queen” she’s been described as looking like lately!

    Reply
  253. Kate said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Yeah that will work , I will go over there and sign on to PM you, just for the use one time..

    Reply
  254. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Lol Yes, either she wants to look ‘ friendlier ‘ or she might have read this article published by a British Science Journal : Cavemen Preferred Blondes …. lol
    http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Story?id=1675734&page=1

    Reply
  255. Kate said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Okay I created a dummy email to use one time, email me at this email, I will email you from that with another email address then I will cancel this one. thisisridiculousyes@yahoo.com trolls need not bother as this will be cancelled.

    Reply
  256. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Apparently the EvilMzJolie is trying to wash that man right out of her hair with Clairol….lol

    Reply
  257. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    @Tamara:
    Lol Tamara! good one! Perhaps Brad’s missing sensitivity chip is in the wax as well..wink!!

    Reply
  258. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Our votes do not count. It is simply an exercise between the two controlling parties to make the people think they have a say. One only need look at the overwhelming opposition to the Iraq war and the first bailout see that the “elected” officials don’t give one shit about you and me. The lobbyists control DC.

    Reply
  259. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    Hahahaha …. she needs a washing-hair-obsessive-compulsive disorder to get THAT out of her hair …lol

    BTW….. The ever interesting Holly is with her in Washington D.C. ….. If the other woman would be Holly and not Jenny, now, how very disappointing is that ?

    Reply
  260. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    my last comment was for you, sorry

    Reply
  261. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Well, well, well. If Holly Goline is with Angie in D.C. now, who is watching the baby Holly bore the same time Angie “had” the twins? Funny how no one can find out anything about that either…..

    Reply
  262. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @Kate:

    Ok, I’m in, username is initial’s of current username here. Have to go to bed soon so don’t keep me waiting!

    Reply
  263. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    She could take a bath in old fashioned lye soap and still not clean the stench of degradation off her body. Jolie is so over!! I do think that both she and Brad will soon be done with fans, HW, movies, all of it. Just as i think Heidi and Spencer are a flash in the pan….ewwww.

    Reply
  264. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    @Kate:

    Ok done!x

    Reply
  265. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    Yeah, that gets my vote too. I don’t think she is capable of having a woman friend who she isn’t banging. Too much competition/sexual frisson. Maybe we should do some digging on this Holly character, we don’t know too much about her do we?

    Reply
  266. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Ok we can agree to disagree about the press and about the BBC which again I will say, is better than US news but to me, not that much. The US taxpayer owns PBS like the UK taxpayers own the BBC. Plenty of propaganda coming out of there and then there is CSPAN which is a propagandist’s dream. My biggest bitch with the press and propaganda has to do with the constant deference to a small group of countries and regimes (including the US) with no discovery presented about “the other side”. Sorta like the Somali Pirates propaganda. Why are there evil terrorist pirates? Why is that the best way to make bank in Somalia? Oh, bc governments and corporations fished the seas dry and then used them for a toxic waste dump? That wasn’t on the news.

    As for Iran, the problem is that like the Shah, Mousavi is a US puppet. Like Karzai, like Sakaashvili. It is mercenary and wrong to use the protestors in Iran to advance US colonialism. Regardless of how we feel about the people of Iran (and I am a big fan of Persians) other countries need to mind their own fucking business. Especially this country!

    Reply
  267. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Both, TransworldNews used by AJ for most of her PR releases, and CNN are based in Atlanta. Guess where Holly lives ? She also worked for CNN once…. too much of a coincidence ? Not ?

    @Patty Anne:

    Reply
  268. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    http://www.celebitchy.com/56346/hillary_clintons_elbow_is_team_aniston/
    Jun 18
    ‘09Hillary Clinton’s elbow is Team Aniston

    CB already covered part of this story earlier today – Hillary Clinton broke her elbow this morning and now she has officially cancelled on Angelina Jolie. Angelina and the Secretary of State were supposed to attend a Washington DC World Refugee Day event, as well as jointly hand out Foreign Service Awards. But Hillary had to cancel. Why does Hillary’s elbow hate Brangelina? Is Hillary’s elbow Team Aniston?

    I should also note that Angelina is still scheduled to appear on AC 360, being interviewed by none other than Anderson Cooper. The rumor yesterday was that Angelina and Hillary would be doing a joint-interview on AC 360, but I could find that confirmed anywhere. I suspect that Angelina would be doing the interview, and then she and Hillary would be doing appearances together during the next few days:

    Hillary Clinton has canceled a meeting Thursday with Angelina Jolie after breaking her elbow.

    “On the way to the White House late this afternoon, Secretary Clinton fell and suffered a right elbow fracture,” her chief of staff Cheryl Mills said in a statement overnight. “She was treated at The George Washington University Hospital before heading home.”
    Clinton will have surgery next week.

    She was supposed to join Jolie at a World Refugee Day event and present awards at the American Foreign Service Association.

    Jolie, who recently finished shooting the spy thriller Salt, is still expected to attend the event. She is also slated to appear on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360.

    On Wednesday, it was announced that the Jolie-Pitt Foundation has donated $1 million to the U.N. refugee agency providing aid to displaced people in Pakistan.

    [From US Weekly]

    Good Grief! That explains it then! Hilary Clinton is cousin many times removed to Angelina Jolie…lmao

    Reply
  269. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I am all for it, let’s get started !

    Transworldnews and CNN are Atlanta based, where Holly lives, she used to work for CNN. We know that much for sure.

    Reply
  270. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    You will love the Channel 4 news, it covers all those types of stories, you must check it out. Plus there are quite a lot of docs in the UK that cover that sort of thing: Dispatches is a key strand for one and Unreported World (which one of my friend’s reports on) for another. Check them both out, they will be right up our street. Channel 4 is a much more “edgy” channel than the beeb who as I said are very UK-centric (responsibility to the interests of the licence fee payers and all) and quite nanny-ish. Channel 4 is very different. I think in general our press is much more free than in the US, especially the TV. Newspapers are a mixed bag but The Guardian and The Independent also cover all that stuff. We defo get “the other side” quite a lot!

    Reply
  271. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Oh my God – you are right! She is channeling sweet Jen! Evil Ms. Jolie may color (or bleach) her locks but that is the ONLY thing that she can compare to sweet Jen! HA Ha :P

    Reply
  272. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    That meant to say “your street”, but I think “our” is also not too far off the mark!

    Reply
  273. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    Hm, I doubt she holds much sway with that though, and besides I think Angelina has the worldwide media pretty much sewn up all on her little ownsome! The corresponding pregnancies I am interested in though, especially if Holly might be the prime suspect for Jolie’s current lady friend. Can you see where I’m going with this???? Hmmm……

    Reply
  274. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    Holly is listed with 3 addresses in Atlanta area, Georgia and birthday in the People Search Engine ( which I cannot give out here ) but for anybody to look up……

    Reply
  275. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    A bunch of us tried to find anything we could on Holly Goline of Atlanta Georgia, and came up empty. I was hoping to find something about her child(ren), timeline, photo, anything really. Seems strange that she would leave a baby under one year old (due to born same time as AJ’s “twins”)….so where is the little one? What sex is it? Nada! Nothing out there about Holly’s personal life at all….someone said her hubby worked for AJ in some capacity, but don’t know if that still holds true. I can’t help but wonder if Holly isn’t the key to all this Twin Speculation…? Makes sense to me…

    Reply
  276. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    … this has been suspected for quite same time (before all of them got more or less pregnant ) ….. Holly has husband (beard ?) who sometimes works in some profession in AJ movies…..

    Reply
  277. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Also you may like this company if you want to order some docs to view at home:

    http://www.journeyman.tv/

    Let’s just say I am more than familiar with this company….!

    Reply
  278. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    ..he worked in Salt as some technical guy….

    Reply
  279. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    I think that is also a strong poss. It would make sense to me. And maybe there was some sort of long-term plan involved….. just a wild theory!

    Reply
  280. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    According to published data , she is 38 years old…..

    Reply
  281. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:

    I have friends in Marietta, Georgia …. let me investigate a little bit …..

    Reply
  282. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Holly’s middle name is Michelle …… wild guess here, but does ring a bell ?

    Reply
  283. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @Tamara:
    That a funny one Tamara! :D

    Reply
  284. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Plus I meant to say we also have Newsnight, a 3/4 hr show every week night on BBC2 between 10.30-11.15pm. It is an analysis of the news, often the international stuff over domestic (unless its major news), and experts/members of different political groups/human rights/activists groups come on to debate the stories. You also get this on the Channel 4 news though actually. Newsnight is usually hosted by Jeremy Paxman, a British broadcasting leg for being a very, very tough, aggressive interviewer. You might like that two. There are actually hours of news-based/current affairs based shows on TV every day in the UK. You can literally watch them all night long on the 4 main terrestrial channels. Its good stuff. (And there ends my little advert for the UK TV industry!).

    Reply
  285. ladybert62 said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Poor hapless: “all alone am I, ever since your goodbye – all alone with just the best of my heart – people all around, but I dont hear a sound, just the lonely beating of my heart” – OK – lets sing it all togther now for hapless: “all alone am I ….” ha ha – He is having the time of his life without the evil Ms. Jolie! Maybe he will finally shave off that skraggy face hair! :P :D

    Reply
  286. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @ladybert62:

    lol….. can you hear me sing already ? lol

    Reply
  287. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    Here is a very timely and documented example of BBC propaganda on the Iran situation:

    The BBC has again been caught engaging in mass public deception by using photographs of pro-Ahmadinejad rallies in Iran and claiming they represent anti-government protests in favor of Hossein Mousavi.

    An image used by the L.A. Times on the front page of its website Tuesday showed Iranian President Ahmadinejad waving to a crowd of supporters at a public event.

    In a story covering the election protests yesterday, the BBC News website used a closer shot of the same scene, but with Ahmadinejad cut out of the frame. The caption under the photograph read, ‘Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi again defied a ban on protests’.

    This is not the first time the BBC has been caught red-handed using crude image and video framing techniques for the purposes of political propaganda.

    The rest of the article is hear:

    http://www.infowars.com/bbc-caught-in-mass-public-deception-with-iran-propaganda/

    Reply
  288. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Wonderful! I’d be interested in any information about family…like where is this nearing one year old child? Quite possibly Angie has it and is calling it a “twin”…..hummmm Threesomes, Brads fantasy sex life, Holly + Angie + Brad = 3 + baby by each woman? Now wouldn’t that be a kicker…your woman, and her bff both impregnated simutaneously….lmao For having “two grains of sand stacked upon each other” a la Juliette Lewis, he sure has some powerful swimmers!

    Reply
  289. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    @Patty Anne:

    I don’t know if any of this is already out or not ……. found that 38 year old Holly shares house with 35 year old guy ( different name than hers, his first name is Mark, don’t know if I can give out his family name here ). Either, she kept her maiden name or they are not married. No kid has been spotted.

    Reply
  290. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    Here is an article that is also relevant:

    How (Twitter and) I Crashed Iran’s Propaganda Web Sites

    http://www.esquire.com/the-side/opinion/twitter-hacks-iran-election-propaganda-061809#ixzz0IpKFNQHB&D

    Just saying. I am not making this shit up.

    Reply
  291. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Very interesting information! No kid spotted huh? Well, that does give one something to consider dosen’t it? It would be one year old around July 12, the date of the so-called Twins birth. I don’t know or remember if i had known, what her “hubby’s name was….you did a terrific job! Going to have to call you Mz Marple

    Reply
  292. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    …. YEAH …that is me…. you outed me lol

    Reply
  293. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    Access Hollywood on television just now showed St. Angie’s performance, complete with nearly breaking into tears over the plight of the displaced peoples of the world. Her hair is horrible! Black roots! Then of course they went into the generous, million dollar donation SHE made…not they, but she. It’s ooooooooooooover

    Reply
  294. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    HaHaHaHa….well i do admire your style

    Reply
  295. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    …. they own a 4 bedroom house together ….. he is just a regular guy , doing odd jobs in AJ movies, Holly must be bringing home the money ….@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  296. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    …. OK … HE, BP makes $1 mill donation….. She, AJ makes a $1 mill donation……. too me that says, they are dissolving their Foundation !

    Reply
  297. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Well that makes it more and more curious dosen’t it? Two people, no kids spotted, yet a 4 bdrm home? Odd jobs in AJ movies….do i hear the word BEARD? Angie’s with a woman now….and Holly was in D.C. with her …now. Both pregnant simultaneously, yet Angie shows up with Twins, and Holly has no visable child….Dang IAN, we’re doing your job for the book here….or Mz Marple is….wink!

    Reply
  298. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    RIGHT!

    Reply
  299. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    ….. hehe…. lets keep busy snooping around lol

    Reply
  300. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    I also read today on JJ that Angie is finished filming SALT, and soon will take the kiddies and move to their place in France…..for the summer yano…wink, wink. Brad, it said, will go to South America upon completion of Moneyball, to produce and star in his next project.

    Reply
  301. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    I’ll be anything that Holly goes to France with Jolie. I noticed that on a people search, Holly Goline also lists New Orleans, La. as her home….interesting.

    Reply
  302. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    If Holly and Angie are….together….and wanted children together, it would make perverted sense in Jolie’s mind, for Brad to impregnate both of them. It’s common knowledge that when two or more women work together for a long period of time, their mensis coordinate with one another. Their children would have more benefits being raised as twins by Jolie with Holly in the vicinity but keeping a low profile. Brad had the best of both worlds, he got Angie whom he believed to be his Golden Ticket to HW royalty, and…he got threesomes. That would in part explain why they are taking the long, slow road to separatedom….to raise no questions. They would each hold the other to silence and cooperation to do the parting of the ways in as peaceful a manner as possible…. IMO…..could be

    Reply
  303. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    She has a place on Wilson Ave. New Orleans….. think it’s small apartment..or little house…. nothing fancy

    Reply
  304. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    … but better than hotel anytime…. lol

    Reply
  305. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    If her home in New Orleans is anywhere near Jolie’s in the French Quarter, it’s very expensive, even the smallest apartment it outrageously high! I love the French Quarter, it’s so thrilling and exciting just walking around the cathedrals, street musicians, boats on the river sailing by slowly…ahhhhhhh….street vendors, and the shops! To die for!

    Reply
  306. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Nice hypothesis …… IMO very interesting ….. Ian, please investigate lol

    Reply
  307. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Yano, with IAN having undercover resourses, he could most likely get the information, which is public information, at the courthouse in Marietta Ga on a birth to Holly during that time frame. It would show up on income tax forms as a dependant, but that is private information. Just letting my brain roam here, don’t y’all panic…lol. I think the key to the entire lock box is Holly’s pregnancy. The “twins’ birthday is coming up quickly, and yet nada, no stirring with the paps about a possible sighting, photo op , nothing. So many people share the opinion that the break up between Angie and Brad occured around October….I wonder what happened then to bring it about? So many questions, i wonder if IAN’s book on Jolie will answer them?

    Reply
  308. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    No, it,s not near the French Quarter….. it maybe in the area where BP is building his houses … maybe they gave her one his carton box houses to stay ….

    Reply
  309. Constant Gardner said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    Did anyone hear about the Morgan Freeman and his step daughter scandal? Holy shit. Michael K has it.

    Reply
  310. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    Mz Marple, i keep getting this nagging feeling about Jolie though….she and Jenny Shimizu have such a deep connection beyond just physical according to Jenny. Jenny even said not that long ago that she would get a phone call from Angie wanting sex, because no man could satisfy her as Jenny could, so there is a need both psychological, and physical. Then….she adopts a Cambodian boy, Maddox . Jenny gave an interview in late 2005 stating that she and Jolie were still doing the wild monkey thing then too…and Jolie was already seducing Brad during that time. Cambodia figures strongly into the equasions too imo. Angie did Tomb Raider there, she bought a home there, she took Jenny there many, many times, and she “adopted” Maddox from there. Figuring out Angelina Jolie’s Bi-Polar (imo) mind is a real trip….arghhhh…coffee break

    Reply
  311. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    OR….it’s a dummy address

    Reply
  312. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    yes, i read that on MSNBC tonight…i was thoroughly disgusted with Mr. Freeman. I had believed him to be such a true gentleman too. :-( Step Granddaughter, and their sexual affair continued for years! What is wrong with men and women today? He’s doing a Mel Gibson imo…throwing his entier life’s work and reputation away for some strange poontang

    Reply
  313. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    hmmmm…. there is also another address in New Orleans, on 1st St ….. which looks even worse….. just paid a visit with Goggle Video Street View ….. lol

    Reply
  314. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    …why so many dummy address ? …interesting….. tax write offs ?

    Reply
  315. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    IMO…they are dummy address’ set up to confuse the issue should anyone dare to think that Holly and Angie are actually lesbian lovers…. IAN is going to have a huge hit on his hands with his expose’ on Angelina Jolie; Fairy Tales…..I just hope he has some real exposing material in it, such as the mystery surrounding the twins, Zahara’s supposed medical condition, how long were Brad and Angie doing the wild monkey dance before Jennifer filed for divorce, who were they side lovers during the time they were together, dig deeply into the Jolie/Pitt Foundation and get the lowdown on it, when and where did they marry legally (i don’t believe they did) and when and where the annulment…so many questions…BUT…if they fall apart and end it so that the public is used to it being over…..IAN may not have such a huge hit with that book in that case Time is vital on this book

    Reply
  316. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    … did you know, that AJ has Cambodian citizenship ? She can go there with all her kids and lovers and make sure, BP would have a hard time seeing them – if she wanted to play hardball and if she decides (for real) to stay away from HW for a while …

    Reply
  317. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    And to confuse people who may come looking, such as paps, investigators, etc?? Like the old shell game….which one has the pea?

    Reply
  318. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Now that is one sly woman. She’s got a “safe house” to run to should she need it. And set it up years ago yet. I also read about her Cambodian home, the area surrounding it is filled with land mines. At first when i read that i thought it was PR B.S. to build up her Tomb Raider reputation, but Jenny Shimizu confirmed it in one of her video interviews….the things those two did would raise the hair on your neck.

    Reply
  319. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    … time is of the essence ….. the sooner the better ….. maybe, that’s what he is doing right now….. writing day and night finishing the book … stuff is happening every day ….. he probably has re-written the ending many times to keep it de jour ……

    Reply
  320. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    It’s clear to me now that Angelina Jolie is very well able to complete hide those things she doesn’t want to be viewed in the light of day. For all her publicity there don’t appear to be many truths about her out there at all. I’m still wondering about the Bio information i found on wikipedia about a third Voight child, a son, Matt Sigourney aka Wheels. Nothing on him at all…

    Reply
  321. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    haha… safe house… very good…. when Jenny talked about the blood flowing …. I hit my delete button….

    Reply
  322. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Oh yes, i know that part, when Jenny talked about how they both had pillow lips and when they would kiss each other on the lips they did so savagely, with blood flowing between their bodies…ewwwwwww

    Reply
  323. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    http://www.rte.ie/arts/2009/0618/pittb.html

    …and now BP and AJ go head-to-head for award …. haha …. does that mean , both have to show up together, even if they are broken up ?

    Reply
  324. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:13 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Oh that’s good! Lol. I bet neither of them shows up after making the round of losing every award possible all this season….
    Access Hollywood tv program tonite said in a poll for sexiest male (forget which poll this one is) the guy from Twilight came in first, a male model came in second, and Pitt came in third. That should tell him something, shouldn’t it?

    Reply
  325. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    …. and even better, can you imagine one of them wins, and the loser has to fake joy over the other one’s win ??? …. hugging ach other with a knife pointing at each other’s back lol

    Reply
  326. Ms Agatha said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    … got to run…. nice talking to you … lol

    Reply
  327. Patty Anne said on June 18th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Have a good evening…..

    Reply
  328. benjaminbutton14 said on June 18th, 2009 at 11:56 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. I am longing to get to New Orleans have heard so much about it we will bve there for 10 days. I did read that Brad’s house is in the French Quarters, so is our Hotel, might have to check it out.

    Reply
  329. unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    It is not much – all you will see is a pink wall. as is most of the quarter lodgings, the courtyard is hidden. It is interesting to walk past, though – but, its pretty much a wall.@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  330. unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:27 am

    DONT get me wrong – beyond that wall, im sure it gorgeous !

    Reply
  331. unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:30 am

    @Patty Anne:
    It tells them that its the TEEN CHOICE AWARDS, and most teens are gonna pick the TWILIGHT DUDE, duh. Thats a no-brainer. And AJ and BP are going head-to-head for fav ACTIVIST – I dont think it MATTERS which wins, that isnt the point! Man, you people sure make up your soap operas, dont you ?

    Reply
  332. unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:35 am

    OK, I had taken a break from this site for a few days to take care of my mother. I returned, and tried to catch up, but realized it is futile. YOU ALL ARE NUTS. YOu are WORSE than the Brangeloonies that make up soft porn stories! Do you all watch General Hospital also, because you would love soap operas. Quit making CRAP up just to TYPE something. Geesh. You all are nuts just for concocting all these ridiculous scenarios about someone YOU HATE. HELLO McFly ???

    Reply
  333. unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:37 am

    PS – Good morning to you all when you return. I have a NUTS family, so I feel comfortable here. Just realize I will tell you are nuts from time to time.

    Reply
  334. harikari girl said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:20 am

    @benjaminbutton14:
    If you don’t like your hotel then check out the Melrose Mansion. It’s a small boutique hotel right on Esplanade – Esplanade is kind of the dividing street between the French Quarter and the Faubourg Marigny neighborhood. The staff are all extremely helpful – they’ll even keep you company if you’re an insomniac like me and bring fresh lemonade out to the pool area at 3 in the morning. OH, and the owner is GORGEOUS! Plus Lenny Kravitz often sneaks in and goes up to a room they keep for him on the 3rd Floor.

    I saw a roach and jumped on the bed and screamed at the top of my lungs – even though the roach was technically outside the building. So they bumped me up to their top suite. When I arrived there, it was just me, my boyfriend, 5 people from Miramax and a guy from the Wall Street Journal. So, if you like walking a bit, it’s really a cool place to stay.

    Reply
  335. unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:33 am

    Esplanade is gorgeous – pink and so quaint. Man, I love the French Quarter.

    Reply
  336. harikari girl said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:40 am

    @Constant Gardner:

    Thanks for posting that Esquire article. I had CNN on for 3 hours today and still was not getting a comprehensive time line report of what had happened and, as a result, what is happening.

    Reply
  337. harikari girl said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:43 am

    @unknownxcat:

    Love Esplanade too. On a pretty day, if it’s not sweltering outside, walking down Esplanade makes you feel like you’re in another century on this grand avenue.

    Reply
  338. unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:51 am

    @harikari girl:
    Oh so nice… I so want to go back. SOON.

    Reply
  339. sama said on June 19th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    ENTERTAINMENT WISE

    Jennifer Aniston On Hot Date With Boyfriend Bradley!
    Despite denying rumours…
    Friday 19th Jun 2009
    …more Jennifer Aniston »
    Jennifer Aniston has been spotted on a romantic date in New York City with Bradley Cooper, confirming rumours that the infamous singleton has a new love interest.

    Though the pair were spotted getting cosy at the premiere after party of Jen’s new movie ‘Management’ last month, Bradley later denied that anything was going on between them.

    Now new pictures of them dining out together in New York are likely to pique suspicions even futher…

    Reply
  340. Patty Anne said on June 19th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    @unknownxcat:
    Lol, thanks for the warning cat. It’s not that we disagree about something, it’s how we disagree. Respectfully. As for your “nutz family” i’m sure they have their good side as well, and remember, it will never be dull around your family! Enjoy them in their uniqueness!

    Reply
  341. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 19th, 2009 at 11:41 am

    @Constant Gardner:

    That’s interesting but if that is the case then I wouldn’t say the journo and the BBC were patrt of a govt conspiracy. It would be because the beeb is essentially a pretty left-wing, pro-human rights organisation and either wanted it to be or it was simply a mistake (deliberate or otherwise) on the part of the journo. The BBC and the govt are not linked at all, it is free from links with any political organisation and has to give a balanced view of all political parties and opposing opinions. Its all in the charter. There was also quite a big houha recently because the beeb refused to broadcast a charity appeal for victims of the Israeli attack on the Gaza strip even though other channels were doing it. The beeb decided that it would seem like they were taking sides in the conflict which was ridiculous as it had already ended and it was an appeal for civillians not Hamas. Anyway, that was the decision that was taken and they stuck to it against much condemnation from the public. But of course the beeb is a huge organisation and editorial decisions may be made by different individuals in different ways elsewhere. That was one that was decided by the very top brass though so it is representative of the beeb’s, in general, overly cautious desire to be impartial. That doesn’t mean it is always happens in practice though. When decisions don’t go through the very top they get made by lower level editors and mistakes happen. Witness the recent Jonathan Ross/Russell Brand debacle where the Producer didn’t edit the phone conversation as Andrew Sachs had requested and put it out unedited – cue big outcry. If images are being used in a misleading way as you suggest then I would say it was down to individuals either making mistakes or wanting to believe the images are telling them what they want them to. Or perhaps the person who e-mailed them to the journo made the mistake. Journos do make big errors, as was the case with Piers Morgan’s notorious publishing of supposed Iraqi torture pictures which it was clear to everyone and his aunt were faked! Cue his sacking as Editor of The Mirror and a glamorous, lucrative career judging America’s Got Talent! Funny how it all turns out! But anyway, I will argue to the death that the aim of the beeb is to be impartial as believe me it has been drummed into me so much I can’t think any other way. Plus when you work for them you really realise how very strict everything is and how much bureaucracy you have to go through to get anything done; so many people that you have to consult on the smallest editorial detail and so much info you have to verify and get permission to go ahead with. But clearly it is not a foolproof system, but it is without doubt more rigorous than any other broadcaster I’ve worked for.

    Sorry for the lack of paragraphs, hope that was intelligible!

    Reply
  342. Constant Gardner said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I think that Twitter is the tool for psychological operations on the western population, yes. As for civil rights/human rights in Iran, there is little doubt that there is oppression there. But there are millions of people all over the world crying out for justice. Why do we only hear about our “enemies”? Don’t answer that. . Dunno. I am rambling, LOL and now I can’t find your original post but thank you for engaging with me on this topic of media and propaganda. I really enjoy it even if it is not AJ related. I will check to see what is downthread and keep it going w you you big ole cyber bully you.

    Reply
  343. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 19th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @unknownxcat:
    unknownxcat said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:35 am
    OK, I had taken a break from this site for a few days to take care of my mother. I returned, and tried to catch up, but realized it is futile. YOU ALL ARE NUTS.
    ————————————————–
    Ya got that right, sistah.
    Call me obsessed if you must, but this is MUCH better than anything on TV.
    Wildly entertaining.
    Of course, I’ve always had a soft spot for the crazies…

    Reply
  344. Constant Gardner said on June 19th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    The BBC has a well documented pro Israel agenda and many cases of bowing to their lobby. No one needs me to point that out as many people around the world are pro Israel. I get that. Much like news orgs in the US and the so called “liberal media’ these media organizations are far from liberal. But that is what we are told about them so that is what we believe. For example, MSNBC in the US is widely hated for being left wing, pro Obama, anti America and all kinds of shit. But the simple fact is that the Rachel Maddows and Keith Olbermanns on MSNBC are simply opposite extremes of the same propaganda on Fox. In other words, Olberman is no different from OReilly. MSNBC owned by NBC owned by GE. GE is one of the largest defense contractors there are. Just how anti govt are they going to be? You will never hear a reasoned and intellectual debate about very hot topics such as elections, abortion, Israel/Palestine or other emotionally charged topics. All they do is obfuscate and scream back and forth, these so called media elites. Back to BBC. Remember I am picking on them but I still enjoy the channel. I appreciate it that at least they treat the viewing audience as if they were more than drooling idiots which is more than our networks do. And I will restate that BBC programming is overall superior to US programming BUT how can the BBC tell the truth when its general managers are appointed by the government?

    Media Disinformation and the BBC (from a site that is not a conspiracy site)

    snip:
    Most important is how BBC functions, who it serves, and Media Lens’ editors explain it best and keep at it with regular updates. They argue that the entire mass media, including BBC, function as a “propaganda system for elite interests.” It’s especially true for topics mattering most – war and peace, “vast corporate criminality,” US-UK duplicity, and “threats to the very existence of human life.” They’re systematically “distorted, suppressed, marginalized or ignored” in a decades-long public trust betrayal by an organization claiming “honesty, integrity (is) what the BBC stands for (and it’s) free from political influence and commercial pressure.”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4_ZWjJNI0A&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidicke.com%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D69172%26page%3D82&feature=player_embedded

    Finally, about 911. Of course it was an inside job. There is overwhelming documentary evidence of that fact. Ditto London Tubes, Madrid and Bali. Anyone who believes that there is NOT state sponsored terror is terribly naive. Start with Operation Northwoods, now unclassified. But I am mostly trying to not go to much into 911 here bc it causes flame wars. I am a thinking person. I wasn’t always one though. I woke up when I learned that Osama bin Laden had been a known CIA operative for years assisting the US in the proxy war with Russia. Sort of like Hussein. First he is our buddy and then he is painted to be BY THE MEDIA as a great big boogey man. A common enemy for Americans to hate. Let’s see, those words seem familiar. Oh, I remember:
    First it was Kissinger calling for world population reduction in the Project for a New American Century. Then he called for a New Pearl Harbor as a catalyst for controlling people. Sort of like this:

    “Naturally, the common people don’t want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a parliament or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.”
    - speaking at the Nuremberg Trials following WWII

    Scary times. And we wonder how AJ gets away with her shit? Because media lies.

    Reply
  345. Constant Gardner said on June 19th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    ps oh shit i forgot to erase that YT link. Sorry. I get too excited with my theories sometimes!!

    Reply
  346. Constant Gardner said on June 19th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    here is the correct link to the article about the BBC if anyone other than me and Keane are interested:)

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8626

    Reply
  347. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 19th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Yeah we are definitely coming from totally diametric opposites when discussing the beeb and UK news media in general (the US is a totally different kettle off fish of course and I find it extremely shocking). And definitely when it comes to 9/11, Bali, Madrid and the London bombings. I was open-minded on the 9/11 thing until I saw the doc I’m referring to which addressed all the arguments of the conspiracy theorists and presented very conclusive evidence to the contrary. The BBC clip was completely debunked, by speaking to the production crew and reporter themselves, there was a very simple technical glitch involved. And the concept that WTC 7 was a controlled explosion was countered with the evidence of a demolition expert who said the building would have had to have been laid with miles and miles of explosives to bring it down and there’s no way that could have been done without anyone seeing them do it. They also put the argument that the explosives could have been laid down when the building was built and he said no way, dynamite becomes inactive after a year, WTC 7 was built years ago etc. And I definitely do not think the Bali/Madrid/London bombings were an inside job either. People connected to the London bombings live near me, they hid the bombers whose bombs failed to explode and helped one of them to leave the country. There were people invloved in those bombings from all over London and elsewhere.

    I do agree that the US govt is one very shady operation and there is a lot that I wouldn’t put past them, but deliberately murdering thousands of its own citizens in spectacular style is most definitely not one of them. Hundreds of thousands of citizens in the non-western world? Yes, for sure. Americans and big business interests? No way. However I am more amenable to the theory that the plane due to hit the pentagon was shot down, its possible but again there is supposedly phone evidence to contradict that. And as for the UK govt, well they have been very led astray by the US govt in the last decade but on the whole it is a much less shady, trustworthy operation. The biggest govt scandal we’ve ever had is that MPs have been diddling their expenses claims – which has been all over the news for weeks and just won’t go away, the BBC included – and numerous heads have rolled for that. (This was exposed by The Telegraph newspaper BTW in case you weren’t aware of it). If they were discovered to have been sponsoring terrorist acts in the UK and abroad, well, all I can say is there would be some sort of revolution going on if that happened, govt itself would be dissolved.

    And as for Israel, the UK on the whole are generally more biased towards Paelstine, we are not fond of Israel at all here. We see Isreal as very much being the puppet of the US trying to gain control over the Middle East. We are not a big fan at all. Some of my friends were going to go to Israel to protest against the bulldozing in fact. It was after Tom Hurndell and I was like, no way, they will have no qualms in shooting you either. And I have never noticed a pro-Israel bias in the BBC and believe me I am vrey sensitive to these things, I am a “trendy lefty” through and through believe me! Although I will concede that the beeb’s failure to broadcast that Gaza appeal was odd. But bizarrely it turned out that the resulting controversy served to get the appeal about a million times more column inches than it otherwise would have. But in any case, channel 4 and I think ITV were always going to broadcast it anyway. The fact that we have several news channels means that we get a variety of perspectives which helps. As an aside I’ve just seen that Iran are blaming the UK and in particular the BBC for the protests over the elections, which makes me elicit a great big cheer, you, not so much I would have thought!

    Reply
  348. harikari girl said on June 20th, 2009 at 8:17 am

    @Tamara:
    Did you know Anderson’s brother committed suicide by jumping off their penthouse terrace while Gloria looked on horrified? I can’t remember exactly, but I think Anderson was there when it happened. It f*cked both of them up big time.

    Reply
  349. Constant Gardner said on June 20th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    @Keane Cyber Queen Supreme:
    I don’t know if you are still checking this thread, LOL, it just dawned on me to go back and see if you were responding this morning. Just a couple of points: pro israeli media propaganda is out of control in the US. I recently saw some survey somewhere that showed American attiitudes v Euro attitudes on the I/P topic and it did clearly indicate that Europeans tend to be more balanced and certainly more Pro Palistinian than Americans. I give your media credit for that. But that doesn’t mean that your media is unblemished. As for 911-I learned long ago that it is a fruitless argument. What is that saying? A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still. So to each his own on 911. So let us leave the topic of 911, please. We could both wallpaper the place with our opinions and no ones mind would change. People have to discover their own truths in their own time, if at all. The bigger point I would like to make about media propaganda is easily captured on this very site where every day we all meet to dissect the latest news and information about AJ/BP. There is general agreement that the JP’s bought off People magazine or that People bought them off whichever way you want to look at it-IN EXCHANGE FOR FAVORABLE PUBLICITY! There is your proof right there and we all saw the foundation tax returns, that THE PRESS IS NOT FREE. What is people mag if it is not media? It is owned by the mighty conglomerate Time Warner. My point is that with this situation, everyone on the board seems to agree. But no one wants to believe that the media lies, that the media can be bought, owned, manipulated about other topics (besides celebrities)???????????????????????????? That defies logic to me.

    Reply
  350. Madeggosta said on July 4th, 2009 at 4:53 am

    http://corporacionmary.com/AWStats/2506porno/78=porno.html
    [url=http://monkhanilodge.com.au/qigag/2506porno/26=porno.html]онлайн карлики порно[/url]
    армянское порно онлайн
    Adobe CS4 Design Premiun – win

    Reply
  351. Quentin said on November 8th, 2009 at 10:03 am

    Very interesting!!! Thankyou for the read.

    Reply
  352. Usdating said on January 10th, 2010 at 1:15 pm

    Great done and keep posted. Looking forward to reading more from you.

    Reply
  353. penis enlargement said on March 29th, 2011 at 7:21 am

    I apologise, but you could not paint little bit more in detail.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

June 2009
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Meta