IUC Exclusive: We Support the Ladies of IUC

Posted on June 13th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

A big shout out to Keane, Kate, CG, Ladybert et al – Sorry about the Jolie camp infiltrators.  We support you and condemn the gross, abusive and vile attitude of Angie’s infiltrators.  Peace out, ian.

  1. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    Thank You IAN!

    Reply
  2. Keane said on June 13th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    Thanks Ian, we appreciate it. What an adorable lady that Angelina Jolie is hey?! Lol

    Reply
  3. Togi said on June 13th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    FINALLY! It has been very trying and tiring. Hopefully they will go away soon.

    Reply
  4. Keane's Cat said on June 13th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    Thanks Ian! You give me acute sensory overload! MEOW!

    Reply
  5. cuze said on June 13th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    How sweet!

    Reply
  6. walk away said on June 13th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    ANGELINA PLAYFULLY EATS OWN SHOULDERS FOR SICK SEXUAL GRATIFICATION… DEVELOPING….

    Reply
  7. Keane said on June 13th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    @ Ian

    I think you may have upset someone there! She’s just an impartial observer with no agenda other than stopping us all from living in a “state of destructive hatred” yano! LMAO

    Reply
  8. unknown said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    Sounds like shes just throwing some humor in… whats wrong with that ? You all are the most HUMORLESS people around. Typing LMAO does not make it more funny.
    btw, WALK AWAY… i laughed :) .

    Reply
  9. Keane's Cat said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    Mommy, can we eat your taco for dinner tonight? Please? PURR!

    Reply
  10. sweetness said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    LOLZ MA NAYBOR WERE A SECKSY SLURT BUT SHE WERE FUKN N SUKN MY BF BILLY AT ALL OURS O THE NITE! I WERE ALL LIKE BILLY Y U LUV HER MORE THAN ME? MAH BOTTY AS NEVER BEEN UNDA THE NYF! LOLZ!

    Reply
  11. Keane said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    @unknown:

    I’m sure you and walk away will be very happy together then! Check out her posts on the Ike and Tina thread, I think that was fury not humour. She ruptured a vein in her botoxed head apparently. You say potato, I say troll with anger issues etc etc. Oh and if you’re going to be critical of other people’s humour, probably a good idea to try to say something funny yourself now and again. Oh I know, it is just us who don’t have a sense of humour, you are of course hilarious! Defo.

    Reply
  12. OMG said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    Keane have you ever seen psychiatrist? If not maybe you should. You may have the same personality disorders as the woman you love to hate.

    Reply
  13. Caribsmom said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    Thanks alot Ian, we appreciate you too!!! xoxoxoxoxxoxo

    Reply
  14. AIG - Angelina's Infiltration Group said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    Captain Repetition reporting for Duty.

    Oh. Deary. Me. Here. We. Go. Again. With. The … “if it’s against what Ian say, it gotta be Angie” paranoias again!

    Keane’s Cat. That taco of Keane’s be old and smelly. Come cuddle up on my lap instead. I likes the animals. Not like Ian says Angie likes the animals though :-(

    :-P

    Reply
  15. Harikari girl said on June 13th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    This article MUST be a joke – if it isn’t then both AJ and BP have gone insane…

    http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m6d9-Angelina-Jolie-and-Brad-Pitt-fight-bitterly-over-Tootsie-Remake

    Reply
  16. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    @Harikari girl:
    The other one too, can you imagine she would write MS and talk about Jesus after she has publicly said she does not need God.

    Reply
  17. unknown said on June 13th, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    I dont need to say a thing, you guys are HILARIOUS! You just don’t know it, which makes it even more funny.

    Reply
  18. Harikari girl said on June 13th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    Don’t know why, but this pic of AJ reminded me of green pics for Esquire – Ian used the most well known of that shoot for a post some ways back. The post was:

    IUC Exclusive: Angie collapses. Don’t believe the spin. Is Crystal Meth the cuplrit?

    If you punch in and see a close up of that photo, you’ll notice she has a sizeable, modern looking ring on her left hand. I only noticed this because I happen to collect that designer’s jewelry.

    The designer is Betony Vernon – she has a number of different lines she produces, plus commissioned pieces. HOWEVER, AJ is wearing a piece from her sex collection – jewelry that doubles as sex toys/stimulators. AJ’s wearing a puffer. I guess the gal always has sex on the brain…

    Reply
  19. meg said on June 13th, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    @walk away:
    translated in ray catone style:

    ANGELINA… SHOULDERS … SEXUAL GRATIFICATION :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Reply
  20. benjaminbutton14 said on June 13th, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    bb14. Many thanks Ian much appreciated.

    Reply
  21. jill said on June 13th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    U R ALL JUST JELLIS HATERZ

    Reply
  22. Plant #9 said on June 13th, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    NEW TRANSLATION: Angie…ring finger…puffers…sex…jewels…sex…sex….designer commissioned….close up…sex…sex…gal…sex…brain…sex

    Here, kitty-kitty…aren’t you pithy?

    Reply
  23. Meah said on June 13th, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    I didn’t even know this site existed until Keene was on D-listed telling people that she knows every little detail about AJ, that she is highly intelligent and highly educated (meaning the other posters aren’t) and, that Keene (Keane on D-listed) learned it all right here on IUC. Basically, Keene the victim started it.
    That was one of the best threads ever. http://www.dlisted.com/node/31030?page=4

    Reply
  24. Ms Agatha said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    @unknown:

    Happy you feel entertained…… anything we can do for you …. as long as you keep your promise to shut up…

    Reply
  25. unknown said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    Now, when did I EVER promise to shut up ?

    Reply
  26. Laylaboo said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    Walked away, please come back !!!!

    Reply
  27. sama said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    Pitt family donates $1 million for endowment fund
    News-Leader staff • June 13, 2009

    Doug Pitt announces $1 million Pitt family donation.

    As a St. Jude affiliate, St. John’s will require more specialists on its staff.

    In response, Doug Pitt announced the Brad Pitt family, Doug and Lisa Pitt and Rob and Julie Neal will donate $1 million to establish an endowment fund to pay cancer specialists at St. John’s.

    In honor of their mother, the center will be renamed St. John’s Jane Pitt Pediatric Cancer Center.

    When the St. John’s Jane Pitt Pediatric Cancer Center opens this summer, it will temporarily be located fifth floor of the hospital’s west pavilion.

    There are future plans to add a new 31 pediatric unit, a 10-bedroom hospital-based Ronald McDonald House; and double the size the neonatal intensive and pediatric intensive care units.

    St John’s Auxiliary has pledged $1 million to help fund this expansion and other projects.

    http://www.news-leader.com/article/2009 … wment+fund

    Reply
  28. Angie's Pitbull said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    I luv how Angelina’s face is on the “women of IUC thread”. What a backhanded way of saying thanx. Angelina looks beautiful as always. So who are the Angie’s camp infilatrators Ian?? Someone gotta encourage the crazies. Keep the madness here going. Well, I will just have to cosign on what others around the boards are saying. WALKED AWAY YOU SHUT THIS BITCH DOWN GOOD!

    Reply
  29. Different Guest said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    @sama:Interesting choice of words Brad Pitt family, then names the siblings and their spouses.

    Reply
  30. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    @Different Guest:
    LOL, who said Brad is not as smart as she? eh, how is that for effective PR?

    Reply
  31. Ms Agatha said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    @Different Guest:

    ….. and no mention of AJ ….. no donations from her …..the mother of his many children …. who has millions in her own right hmmm

    Reply
  32. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Hey Ms Agatha, I myself have taken a vow to shut up, you will not see me responding to any negative sarcastic comments on the site or posters or trollish in nature. Please feel free to reach through the screen and strangle me should I slip.

    ha ha, but I have complete confidence in that I do not care enough to respond to them unless they care enough to be nice and positive.

    How are you? Hope all is well.

    My vow of silence, because the only fight I can win is by being quiet :)

    Reply
  33. Ms Agatha said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    @Kate:

    sorry to hear about your son, hope he will be OK, glad you are back with us ….. I am pretty new here but getting fonder and fonder of you all….. so, please don’t go anywhere …..lol …. and YES, I promise you to reach through the screen and strangle you if you slip ( I know it won’t be necessary, smile here)

    Reply
  34. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    One could draw the conclusion that they are perhaps no longer together? lol

    Reply
  35. Ms Agatha said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    now, wouldn’t that be a surprise ? lol

    Good night Kate, see you tomorrow ….

    Reply
  36. MaeIAsk said on June 13th, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    Hey Ian – Kiss some more booty why don’t you. You are all a bunch of jackasses. What a lovely mutual admiration society.

    Reply
  37. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Thank you, yes he is better, as old as he is he is still my little boy. I have never have one mishap with my daughter but my son has given me many sleepless nights like this with accidents. Once he was on a trip in another country and I got a call he was stung by a box jelly fish and was in shock, badly. Did anyone ever see that movie with Will Smith , Seven Pounds? whew.

    I think our IUC family here will be on to new and better days ahead. My mom intuition! :) and bet we will be adopting more children too. ha ha

    Reply
  38. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Nite Ms Agatha, new days, new surprises lol

    Reply
  39. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @sama:
    Sama, thanks for posting that, pretty interesting in light of the vague People denials and the absence of Dougs name and no denials when Daryl of the LA Examiner said the AJ decked the crap out of Julie. lol

    Reply
  40. Different Guest said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    @Kate:Very effective – or Jane Pitt said no way in hell are you going to name a children’s hospital wing after me and have that bitch’s name there!

    Your son sounds a lot like my eldest brother. My parents got several calls from out of area emergency rooms.

    Reply
  41. Different Guest said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:29 pm

    @Kate:It really is amusing to watch them talking to themselves and then they start sniping at each other.

    Reply
  42. Kate said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Yes, it is, since it is so easy to recognize the names it is easy for me to not even read it as Alif said, no point in it, just scroll past. Great idea.Takes me less than 2 seconds to decide if I want to get past the intro .lol.

    Reply
  43. Different Guest said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    Anyone know do either Julie or Doug have children?

    Reply
  44. Different Guest said on June 13th, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    Using the term Brad Pitt family, gets him out of identifying which kids really are his.

    Reply
  45. mia said on June 14th, 2009 at 1:20 am

    Kinda paranoid hm? The “infiltrators” are just people with a common sense who don`t don`t take every claim as the eternal truth without proof but definately not paid members of Jolie`s PR team.

    Reply
  46. OMG said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:34 am

    Ian you’re fucking insane. Angie infiltrators?? WTF what a sick fuck you are. Can’t you tell that the ppl hanging on to your every word are mentally ill? Yet you’re still stringing them along.
    Are you trying to start your own cult? Did L Ron inspire you?

    Reply
  47. sama said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    @sama:

    It is also Jen’s favourite good cause….

    Reply
  48. sama said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:21 am

    @sama:

    and the news comes out on the day that jen recieved the award, ???

    Reply
  49. momo said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:13 am

    I think the election has already started for anybody to be Mrs Mayor.???

    Reply
  50. BigApplette said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:12 am

    @Harikari girl:

    Great article. The photo they used is too funny! Thanks for the post!

    Reply
  51. keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:14 am

    Oh OMG, unknown and meah you just need a little love, no need to feel so bitter and angry that IUC don’t love ya! BTW Meah thanks for posting that link, its lovely to see you have been developing some research skills. Shame the only enjoyment you get out of life is from abusing me but there you go, I’m sure you tortured insects as a child cos nobody loved you. Its ok we at IUC only want to improve your lot in life by spreading the love, so big hugs and IUC smooches to all of you from all of us X X X X

    Reply
  52. jan said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:17 am

    morning all. i have found that to ignore people looking for a fight is the best as it is so much energy wasted to argue with people that want to fight as this is the only way they receive attention, maybe they are in a an unhappy relationship or a bad family . i also believe that they have the right to disagree but not attack people personally, but maybe they have a fury temper and cannot help attacking sometimes as it has happened with me when i get angry and then i realize that i am just making myself drop down to the perps level and have tried to stop attacking people because of their different views and skip their posts.
    i have read that they want to make a 2nd wanted and want to bring lollie back after she shot herself in the head, just goes to show she is a air head not even a bullet shot throught the head has an effect. i think the donation peewee made is because he was caught buying a expensive painting and people where commenting on it and this is a cover up for spending so much money after asking for a handout of tax payers money for his no housing project. can somebody help me understand why he needs the goverment to help when he had so many rich people donate money and said he would give ex amount for every ex amount collected. i really think he is a doofus to build houses on the most dangerous spot and such expensive houses for people that have not got the money to mantain these houses give them a normal house with enought room for 4 kids and a mother and father to live not some fancy pink houses. i dont think he is building out of the goodness of his heart but more for the fame and pr they can get. i doubt he would like south africa as we have very little time to be bothered with celebs and are to busy going about our lives and when they are here nobody really takes notice or cares about them, maybe one or two mentions of them in the paper but that is it. glad to see you back kate enjoy your posts as well as a few others . well have a good day as i will be relaxing and visiting friends and family today as i refuse to open our shop on a sunday. god bless all.jmo

    Reply
  53. BigApplette said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:22 am

    @OMG:

    I have a feeling “OMG” stands for “On Medication, Guaranteed.”

    Reply
  54. unknown said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:38 am

    When did I insult anyone ? To each their own as far as humor is measured. If anything, I complimented you. This is the funniest site on the web !
    Don’t get your panties in a wad, its just words on a message board.

    Reply
  55. BigApplette said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:47 am

    @OMG:

    OMG: You did hear that The New York Times reported that Jolie is a master p.r. manipulator, didn’t you? That she bargains for positive press with the likes of People Magazine and other publications? She even calls the shots with her so called “editorial plans” that she dictates to the mags.

    Soooooo….why would it be such a stretch that she has people watching what Ian writes here? Ian has put out a lot of info about AJ that is not positive. Being the controlling person the NYT describes, it would almost NOT make sense that she wasn’t watching blogs and other media outlets. Or, at minimum, her minions are.

    I remember on Huffington Post, there was a poster named GrandyK who would show up on every AJ thread with information that was never out in the media to defend every last word that was ever said about AJ that wasn’t positive. We always asked how that poster got such intimate insider information about AJ but that question was never answered.

    So, my question to you, OMG, if you dare to respond:
    How do you know, definitively, that AJ and/or her minions DON’T read or post here?

    Reply
  56. unknown said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:56 am

    I believe every actress in Hollywood tries to manipulate the press – its called PUBLICITY, PR – they all want it. In AJ’s case, she has the influence to make a few calls, and VOILA – it happens.
    As far as reading this blog – so what if she is? More than likely she is too busy to worry about it. Perhaps she reads this and thinks it is humorous, also !
    You all should read some Old Hollywood biographies – then you will know what media manipulation is. Its called Hollywood; it happens.

    Reply
  57. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:05 am

    @BigApplette:

    Yep I’ve seen that on a lot of other blogs too. Under any negatvive or off-brand story about Ange there is a comment from an alleged “insider” who just happened to stumble on this story/site and just so happened to work on that very film Ange was working on on and the time and just so happened to be able to give an absolutely categorical assertion that the story was not true based on this assertion. Ange and her people have been all over the internet for years. There is a lot of very damaging stuff on her to try to keep quiet after all. Plus she has her eyes on government – ha ha!

    Reply
  58. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:08 am

    @Meah:

    Aw look at little meah desperately trying to state her provenance by providing a link to a thread which anyone could access and which no-one asked her for! Bless. All she needs to do now is tell us her Dlisted username and we will all know for sure that she most certainly is not anything to do with Lady Angelina whatsoever. Its so simple.

    Reply
  59. BigApplette said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:25 am

    @unknown:

    Somehow, I doubt Ms. Jolie finds this site humorous. But, hey, ya never know. The right drugs can make anything seem funny.

    Legal disclaimer: The foregoing post is my opinion only. This post is for entertainment purposes only and is not intended to diagnose or prevent any disease. Batteries not included. (lol).

    Reply
  60. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:32 am

    I think i have a gravatar now ? lets test…

    Reply
  61. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:33 am

    Alrightythen – from Unknown to unknownxcat ~ so all you beautiful people can identify my posts. I’m thoughtful like that.

    Reply
  62. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:44 am

    @BigApplette:

    Ha ha! See unknown, now that was funny. You’ll find this site is full of humour if you take the stick out of your ass, and I mean that in the nicest possible way believe me!

    Reply
  63. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:52 am

    Its a custom made stick… the Angelina Jolie special. For the utmost in pleasure :) . Do I have to remove it already, Domme Keane ?

    Reply
  64. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:54 am

    @BigApplette:
    Ya, weed makes alotta things funny.

    Reply
  65. OMG said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:08 am

    @Bigapplette Because I’m almost certain she has never heard of Ian Halperin or this site. Do you really believe she has people googling away every single day to find what random nobodies are saying about her? Of course she doesn’t. I very much doubt gossip sites are very high on her list of priorities.
    Don’t you find it suspicious that ian was ignoring you all until his loyal followers started to click on to what this blog’s really about? I think i can answer that-no, you weren’t suspicious in the slightest. Why? Because when it comes to ian you have cult mentality. Whatever he says is true in your brainwashed little minds. You don’t believe him to be anything other than 100% true. If anything he writer turns out to be untrue it could never be down to ian could it? Oh no, not ian’s fault must be the source!
    FFS you lot are as bad if not worse than the brangeloonies and jenhags. You worship a wannabe cult leader. How fucking sad does that make you?

    Reply
  66. BigApplette said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:13 am

    @Keane:

    Agreed, Keane. Sometimes we underestimate the comedy fodder that is Ms. Jolie!

    Reply
  67. BigApplette said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:16 am

    @OMG:

    Thank you, darling, for your spirited response. Now, as Perry Mason used to say, “Please, ma’am just answer the question:”

    How do you know, definitively, that AJ and/or her minions DON’T read or post here?

    If you have some “INSIDER INFORMATION” about where Ms. Jolie and her minions do and don’t read or post, do tell!

    Reply
  68. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:22 am

    LOL… Minions.

    Reply
  69. mia said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:44 am

    Yes Ian you are absolutely right: spreading rumors of s.ex with animals, incest, child abuse, Jolie wanting to be/ and or have s.ex with the president and other horror stories is gross, abusive and vile! Unfortunaltely it is YOU who does that so stop blaming somebody else for your disgusting behaviour!

    Reply
  70. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:51 am

    Hey, how do I apply to be a Jolie’s Evil Minion. Thats JEM for those in “the know”. Does it pay well ?

    Reply
  71. mooki said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:55 am

    http://perezhilton.com/2009-06-13-gyllenhaal-tell-all-in-the-works

    a Toothy Tile tell-all is in the works. Sounds like Toothy and Maggie’s dad is a little nutso…

    Reply
  72. BigApplette said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:00 am

    @unknownxcat:

    Ask Trevie baby.

    Reply
  73. mia said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:14 am

    http://www.sundaymail.co.uk/tv-showbiz-news/entertainment-news/2009/06/14/exclusive-working-with-angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitt-was-very-special-says-archie-panjabi-78057-21439797/
    .
    Exclusive: Working with Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt was very special, says Archie Panjabi
    .
    Jun 14 2009 By Steve Hendry
    .
    ARCHIE PANJABI swapped the glamour of the Hollywood A-list for a dreary Scottish winter in her latest role.
    .
    Making BBC comedy Personal Affairs in the shadow of the River City set in damp Dumbarton might feel a little flat after Los Angeles.
    .
    But her pal Angelina Jolie has taught the stunning actress – who plays a bitchy boss in the show – how to keep her feet on the ground.
    .
    Archie, 34, starred with the Oscar-winning beauty in A Mighty Heart, the acclaimed true story of the search for kidnapped American journalist Daniel Pearl.
    .
    Meeting Angelina and her partner Brad Pitt – who helped produce the film – proved a lesson in humility.
    .
    Archie said: “Angelina Jolie was phenomenal to work with. We got on very well. I’m still friends with her.
    .
    “You go thinking, ‘What will she be like? What’s Brad Pitt going to be like?’ But I’ve met hundreds of actors with more arrogance than those two. That’s the biggest shock.
    .
    “I spent two and half months shooting with her so I know it’s not just a front. I came back thinking ‘I can’t take any actor being arrogant’.
    .
    “If she can be so down to earth and have so much respect for people then there’s no excuse.
    .
    “She’s been such a big role model to me. I learnt a lot from her as a woman, how to hold yourself, how to behave, how to talk. Brad was very nice too.
    .
    “They made people working on the film feel like family. It was a strange experience but very special.”
    .
    Archie, who won the Breakout Performance Award at the Cannes Film Festival for her role in A Mighty Heart, has also starred alongside Russell Crowe in A Good Year, Don Cheadle and Guy Pearce in Traitor and in hit British films East Is East and Bend It Like Beckham.
    .
    While she values the humble attitude of her co-stars, she could be forgiven the odd hissy fit on Personal Affairs.
    .
    Her dressing room is a tiny, windowless caravan a stone’s throw from Shieldinch and a very long way from Hollywood.
    .
    She laughed: “It’s a bit like when you go on your first business class flight – economy seems a really big let down by comparison.
    .
    “But you don’t let yourself get too carried away. I just get excited about getting on the plane in the first place.
    .
    “I don’t come back here thinking my dressing room is not big enough.
    .
    “The role is like nothing I’ve done before so that is really stimulating.
    .
    “The worst thing is to be on a huge Hollywood film and be in a really crap role. I get very agitated if I’m not having to try.” Personal Affairs is BBC Three’s flagship show of the summer – a glossy, sexy and surreal new comedy drama about four PAs working in a London investment bank………..

    Reply
  74. dvz said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:43 am

    Wow, what journalism. Patting his toadys (and some of his aliases) on the back. This site used to be such fun, now it is Lainey Lame, just in a different direction. So sad and so frustrating1

    Reply
  75. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    @mia:
    Well, I dunno about you, Mia, but I believe a tabloid reporter who hears silly rumors over some actress who worked with the dynamic duo for 2-1/2 months ! Don’t you, Ianites ? I mean… posters?

    Reply
  76. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    @mia:

    Do you think she banged her? That would be my guess! Lol

    Reply
  77. I'm on the bidet said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    And I’d like to give a big shout-out to “I’m on the bidet” for contributing to IUC, and for relentlessly promoting sit-down sanitation.

    Says feminist author and general twit Naomi Wolf, “Water, in Jungian analysis, is a symbol representing the transition between the personal and the collective unconscious. By stating ‘I’m on the bidet’ this contributor represents a metaphor for all humanity, each of us reaching out personally via the internet to make contact with the broader collective culture”. In response to Wolf’s analysis, ‘I’m on the bidet’ stated “WTF?!?”

    Reply
  78. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    PERFECT metaphor for this site – it’s all crap. AND btw, that was funny !

    Reply
  79. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:29 am

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Keep spreading the word sister, sit down sanitation is the way forward for all true feminist theorists. Screw those crazies who favour the shepee I say, why should we emulate men? Sexual equality should be about men having as much of a right to sit down on the bog as us bitches. Why should anyone suffer the inconvenience of standing up for a slash I say. I am staunchly pro-bidet and where my bidet badge with pride!

    Reply
  80. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:46 am

    Thank You IAN! You Rock! I know i am speaking for all of us when i say how happy and relieved we are to know you support us. Been a battleground here at times, but what dosen’t kill you only makes you stronger…lol

    Reply
  81. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:50 am

    That photo was from Canne, did you notice the slow eye and drunkey poo look?….And that’s what some call glamourous@Kate:

    Reply
  82. Constant Gardner said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:56 am

    Ian,

    Thanks for the shout out however, where is the new CONTENT? Frustrating.

    Reply
  83. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:01 am

    I’ve never seen a single photo of Doug or Julie (Pitt) with children, good question! Loved the slam of Pitt Family Donation omitting Saint Angie’s name….that was about as close to an announcement of The Brand being over as one can get imo@Different Guest:

    Reply
  84. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:03 am

    Great catch there sama! Jennifer has been volunteering/working with St Jude’s Children’s Hosp for decades@sama:

    Reply
  85. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    You hit the nail on the head imo jan…..so true@jan:

    Reply
  86. fresca said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:20 am

    @Kate:
    Hey Kate, I lurk more than post but I have to say that you are very intelligent and knowledgeable about the Skank and her Tool. So just keep posting your wise words and IGNORE THE TROLLS. If you dont acknowledge them then they have nothing to feed off. Personally I dont think they are plants, just insane for their idols which is why the world calls them Brangeloonies. If they were plants I think they would be subtler instead of as insane as they are. Yes AJ is cerifiable but she knows how to play the game btter.

    Just my 2 cents for whta its worth

    Reply
  87. TobyKay said on June 14th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Well, i have to admit that this article hits it on the head for me (even though the article is from 2007).
    http://blogcritics.org/video/article/did-angelina-jolies-off-screen-behavior/

    Reply
  88. Angie's Pitbull said on June 14th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    @mia:
    Thank you Mia !

    Reply
  89. ladybert62 said on June 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    WOW !! Thanks Ian, Sugar Ray and Ms. NineCents! I will be back to read all the posts in a minute! :P

    Reply
  90. ladybert62 said on June 14th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate – I am delighted to see you back – I missed you. :D

    Reply
  91. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    Fantastic find! So as far back at 2007 there were those in the industry who recognized Angie as well as Angie and Brad….as has beens. Just goes to show one can’t take what one wants just because they want it without paying the consequences.@TobyKay:

    Reply
  92. WWW said on June 14th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    oh my god people you need to chill, especially the “brangeloonies” (I didn’t know there was a word for them! haha), so what is she gets negative press? she’s scum anyway!… You all are so desperately trying to convince the world that she is this saint, role model, super mom, mother earth… yada yada…it makes me wanna puke!… I find her really pathetic and not a very good actress. In fact, all the people I know perceive Jolie in the same way, they all get the same vibe from her… it is not coincidence actually, PEOPLE DO NOT LIKE HER. She deserves it though, I have no sympathy from her.

    This is the first time that I post on this blog, or any blog for that matter… I came across this website and I found unbelievable that there are people trying to defend Jolie … hahahaha .. ridiculous actually.
    Anyway people, just chill! Peace everyone!

    Reply
  93. ladybert62 said on June 14th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @TobyKay:
    Hi TobyKay – that was a very interesting article. Thanks for sharing it. :P

    Reply
  94. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @TobyKay:

    That was interesting, particularly this bit which I didn’t really know about before:

    “To further the damage, Angelina turned her mother’s death into a publicity-courting event, posing for several pictures as she went to collect her mother’s belongings. The pictures soon appeared on covers of all the tabloid magazines. Still not getting sympathy, Angelina adopted an orphan from Vietnam to join her other adopted children from Cambodia and Africa. As expected, she used her latest child for several photo ops.”

    I didn’t know she posed for photos collecting her mother’s personal effects, how anyone could bear to do that is beyond me. I know she used the death to get sympathy when she teared up at the press conference after Aniston’s “uncool” comment though, and has used it since when James Haven compared her current weight loss to how she stopped eating “after their mother died” – quite clearly another sympathy ploy to bring it up again. I have to say above all things that she has done for publicity, hooking up with a married man, getting knocked up, adopting children etc, this to me is by far the most abhorrent. It is so abhorrent that I genuinely find it dffficult to believe that she could/would do it. Did she not love her mother? Because if she did I can’t understand how she could possibly use her death in that way. And her brother too. Is it really possible that someone could be so utterky devoid of feeling? And people wonder where she gets the “evil” epithets from! It is totally incomprehenisble to me.

    Reply
  95. mia said on June 14th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    @Keane:

    Hm she didn`t “pose for pictures” she was photgraphed while entering the hospital were her mother stayed! Just like Kate`s beloved Jen just happened to be photographed while she walked several blocks hugging her last boyfriend John Mayer. But sarcasm aside paps follow both parties and yes they photograph both of them because it earns them a lot of money. And just because a journalist thinks it is makes himself sound smart to report everything an actor does in a negative light doesn`t mean he knows somebody elses motives. See I don`t need somebody else to think for me be it Ian or a NY Times reporter. I rather draw my own conclusions.

    Reply
  96. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @Keane:
    We all are aware that Angie’s father and another family member have commented about her mental illness, and that it was first noticed by family members in early childhood (Marcia Lynne took her to a mental hospital for treatment at one point)….and this flat affect is often one of the symptoms of serious mental illness. The total lack of feeling, caring, concern…..i pity those around her who depend upon her without realizing that she is so ill….imo

    Reply
  97. jan said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    mia. if you love and appreciate what your parent has done you would have spend every moment with them near the end and said no to trapsing all of the world as well as making a movie knowning that your parent does not have much tme left. even when a mother or father says carry on with your life they actually would like you to be around but don’t want to beg for your attention. my father had demensure and we where there to change his nappy and look after him as we refused to have him hospitalized and only see him when the hospital allowed it. my cousin looked after her mother the last 4 months and spend every day making her food and her husband and kids supported her she was with her mother when she passed away and she was not rich like lollie she actually gave up her baking which helps support her family because her mom needed her more. that is what i admire about family who’s hearts are in the right place.
    no matter what happens in the family and what past hurts family cause you forgive because you never know when that persons time is here. will she cry when he father maybe passes away without warning and then tell the world how she misses him and bring him up at every interview like she does her mother. imo she is not a forgiving or caring person and will never appologize for the hurt and harm she has done others nor admit she was wrong that makes her not a person to admire or have as a role model, but somebody to pity and dislike at the same time. i think her and peewee are the same type of people and suite one another and i hope one day that when they face their maker they have the right answers. jmo

    Reply
  98. MaeIAsk said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    evil minion here, reporting for duty

    Reply
  99. Keane's Cat said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    I ate my young and won Mother of the Year! Top that! MEOW!

    Reply
  100. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    @mia:

    Mia 9 out of 10 of every pap photo I have seen of Brangelina have clearly been prearranged. You can tell because they make sure they are dressed up very smartly, have immaculate hair and make-up and make sure the photogs get a set of good, clear shots of their faces by making sure they walk slowly enough for the camera to capture them. I have not seen this particular set of photos but all others that I have seen of Brange, apart from one where they are dashing into the back entrance of a hotel from a car and the photog only gets a side view of her face as she is deliberately turning away from him, are clearly prearranged, staged “candid” photos. And yes you are right the paps make a lot of money out of those photos but Brange make as much if not more (from what I hear it used to be 50/50 on the picture sales but now Brange take 2/3, so more than the pap agency). If we’re talking about AJ visiting her mother in hospital the paps would have had to track down totally confidential info about where she was being treated. It would not have been easy for them to do that and it probably wouldn’t be in their favour as by invading the privacy of the most famous woman in the world at such a sensitive time would destroy their relationship with her forever. For the sake of one set of shots it would not be worth them wasting a lifetime of income. (Even the first pics of Brange together on the beach in Namibia, taken by the Big Picture agency, were only worth a million quid I believe to the agency. Yes that’s a lot of money, but nowhere near as much as they or which ever agency they are now with would have made since. I tend to think it is probably Big Picture because those Namibia shots were prearranged by her). So yeah, I haven’t seen the photos of her at the hospital but chances are they were prearranged by her. But yes, there is nothing wrong with forming your own opinions, however misguided they may be in this instance and others.

    Reply
  101. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    I like your uniform….wink!!@MaeIAsk:

    Reply
  102. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    jan, it sounds to me that you have a very loving and close family. Our true riches in this lifetime are family, imo. It’s heart warming to see someone who feels that way also. I nursed my mother who died of lung cancer 10 years ago….broke my heart, but i felt i needed to be with her while i still could. I miss her every day still. there was no way i could continue with life as usual, and hire someone to do my job with my mom, it was my privledge and honor to ease her passing….God bless her soul@jan:

    Reply
  103. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Forbes #1 Most Powerful Woman???@Keane’s Cat:

    Reply
  104. I'm on the bidet said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    @Keane:
    LOL Keane! One question though – where does one pin a bidet badge?

    Reply
  105. Keane's Cat said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    I was recently impregnated by no less than four young gentlecats creeping through the basement window. I call that wide ranging influence.@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  106. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    Have you informed Brad ? @Keane’s Cat:

    Reply
  107. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    Only one place my friend, and I think we both know where that may be! If not, Keane’s Cat may be able to give you a clue, its the orifice she spends all day licking! Pets can be so darn embarrassing sometimes hey?

    Reply
  108. Keane's Cat said on June 14th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    I think and it is written. Such is my power. MEOW!@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  109. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    If Brad decides to put you out, i have a huge back deck overlooking a lake filled with Bass. You are welcome to move in with my other homeless kittys…Mind the Tom’s though! They are friskey bobtails….wink!@Keane’s Cat:

    Reply
  110. Oh really? said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    @mia:
    This is just one of many times I have heard similar reports but from production staff. The consensus, AJ is a class act and a consummate professional. She’s on set on time and prepared to work. She takes direction without taking offense. She knows her lines and doesn’t argue the directors vision of them. She is polite with everyone on the set, top to bottom and clearly knows they have a job to do just like she does. She knows what is expected from experience and gives it, often without being asked. She knows she is working and doing a job, unlike the majority of actors who are there to have their egos nursed.
    FYI, ya’ll need to take a look at your egos if you think AJ would bother sending minions anywhere, let alone to a site as insignificant as this one. You may feel big and powerful when you are here but, at most, one person feels more negatively towards AJ, 20 feel the urge to defend her against what are clearly fantasy.

    Reply
  111. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Sod the cat, can I move in?! Sounds amazing!

    Reply
  112. mia said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    @Keane:

    Strange how come that Brangelina are constantly critisized for wearing “sloppy” clothes and for not combing their kids`hair if what you say is true? And were is the link to a serious newspaper that claims that they get 50% of paparazzi snaps? The only star were this was stated was Britney Spears! Fact is there have been a lot more pictures of other celeb kids lately other than the Jolie-Pitt kids! Be it Suri, Violet Afflek or Gwen Stefanie`s children.

    Reply
  113. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Of course you may….! We’re a perfect distance to the parks as well….everything is within a days reach…I would even introduce you to a few celebrities that frequent our lake: John Travolta, Dolly Parton, Bobby Bare, Henry Winkler…..all are avid Bass fisherpeople, and very nice ordinary folk….@Keane:

    Reply
  114. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @mia:
    Here you go mia….will the NY Times do?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html

    Reply
  115. mia said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Just like keane you have no reading comprehension! I asked for a link that proves your statement that they get 50§ of the pap shots and instead you posted a link to an article about the onetime sale of the twins pictures! Which weren`t pap shots by the way.

    Reply
  116. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Mia doesn’t believe the NY Times, there is no point in resaoning with her!

    Reply
  117. Angie's Pitbull said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Patty did you even read that article your linking? Before jumping on the band wagon.

    Reply
  118. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    I see that now Keane, i tried to be responsive to her, however she resorted to the usual name calling whic indicates to me she’s not here to share in dialog about the EvilAngie’s misdeeds, but rather to insult the very people she chooses to post to. Now where is the logic in that ? ( applying the mental Ignore Button now)@Keane:

    Reply
  119. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @mia:

    Mia, no-one can prove the exact percentage they receive from picture sales unless they have access to either the agency’s or Brangelina’s accounts. So unless anyone fancies breaking into the agency’s offices and stealing their accounts, we aren’t going to get it. But believe me when I say it is not at all uncommon for celebs to have deals with pap agencies for prearranged supposedly “candid” shots. It is widespread and is a major source of revenue for a lot of celebs, from the A to the Z list. The difference is that Brange can command by far the highest fees because they are the most famous, most marketable couple in the world. They can dictate their terms and the agency will go along with it. I would have thought most celebs get more like a third of profits from picture sales. A half to 2/3 is high.

    Reply
  120. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    So you don’t believe in free speech, open dialog and discussion? Well then i understand your motives now too. (again presses the imaginary Ignore Button) Those who resort to insulting others usually do it to hide their own sense of inferiority….@Angie’s Pitbull:

    Reply
  121. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yeah yeah, I thought I was having a mature, adult discussion with her on the other thread, but she just responds with stupidity. There’s no point. These people are not capable of reasoning or argument and have no interest in debate. I genuinely have never come across such people as the loons on JJ and the trolls on here before in my life. There is an “intelligence chip” totally missing in them. Go figure.

    Reply
  122. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Keane, what i’m learning here is that these people do not show the same commaradary that we regulars do here. It’s not about jumping on anything, and amoung friendly people posting opinions on the same topic, invitations to make comments aren’t required here. We don’t direct our comments at only one person and demand that one person respond, input from others is always welcomed here. I think that is what i found so likable about this blog site. Some people it appears, aren’t used to such curtesy, and therefore find it cause for hostile comments…..as Kate says…..Choose Your mental IGNORE button in these cases….and i shall

    Reply
  123. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Its just a total lack of maturity and a total lack of intelligence, simple as that. I occasionally try to reason with them but they just throw it back in your face. Total waste of valuable minutes of our lives. We should just respond with a post saying “IGNORE” from now on, there is nothing to be gained by engaging with them.

    Reply
  124. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Didn’t Jennifer Aniston look smoking hawt at the Females In Films awards? I loved the masses of curls in her hair. And her comments were hilarious! She more or less put to rest all that speculation that she is devistated by the loss of her hubby, and pining for his return, Baby Wipes and all….lol.

    Reply
  125. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Any word out of NYC about where Jolie is actually heading now that SALT is a wrap, or soon will be? I’ve been reading France…but i thought Brad was going to get that in their settlement, although he did fly out recently to remove his personal things…..I know he’s filming or in pre-filming in LA now for Moneyball…

    Reply
  126. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Since Father’s Day is coming up, and I recently saw a article that said Brad was chosen over a few other actors as the choice for the one to wear the Daddy Day under wear I wanted to take a monent to cast my vote for a man in Hollywood who I respect, who I have always liked, feel is genuine, a good father, humble, and gracious.

    Here are a few things of him:

    As a father of four he would find myself standing in his kitchen lecturing his teenagers as only a devoted dad and passionate movie lover could: “If they were doing something I didn’t think made sense, I would say,”what if you saw a character doing what you are doing in a movie? Would you agree with that character?”

    He is not just clean, he is a happy guy. He has a edge-but no anger. He understands darkeness.

    He is wise. He was wise when I first met him. I think he is an old sould. There is a wonderful sense of fairness in him.

    When asked if he has eve done things that have left him disappointed in himself, he said, “Of course, they are embarassing enough that I won’t say what they are, but I really do try to live by this pretty simple principle: my folks were not formally very religious, but they taught us to follow the golden rule.

    He married his childhood sweetheart, who he met in junior high school. They never dated anyone else. He said. “I think it kind of magic, she brings out the best in me, we knew what we could do for each other, and how much we meant to each other”

    At the end of my life Id rather made another film or spent time with my family.

    His dad and his brother have appeared in nearly all his films.

    He is intensely personal in his beliefs and causes, he quietly supports the Boys and Girls Club,He is not the type who feels a celebrity should be vsisible in goverment issues. He once, was glad and at the same time said he would never do it again. It was Obama.

    Last and most important-

    Andy Griffith was a big factor in shaping his sense of the way an adult male , an particularly one in authority handles himself .

    My Fathers Day vote goes to OPI. :) Tom Hanks, his dear friend is a close second, and I don’t know much about Henry Winkler as a father but these aref he people he surrounds himself with.

    Brad on the other hand , well we know who his friends are. He could take a page out of Opis book. All of his kids are grown and stable and he has been married for 35 years to the same person.

    Happy Father’s Day OPI , a little bit early! Before all the crap PR floods us with Brad the Dad Cad.

    This quotes were taken from a interview done by Meg Grant

    Reply
  127. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @Patty Anne:LOL@Patty Anne:
    Patty, I still believe Jen loves him. I suppose Brad could have just been going through his 12 step progam and making amends with CC and DA and Jen but I don’d think so. He has to be the one behind all these articles released to In Touch and Star, and I don’t think he would do that without her approval now that they are friends again. There are just too many little signs, the way she casually jokes, the donation to St Judes, the necklace. Brewing behind the scenes. They may be good friends and nothing more, but I don’t think Jen feels the way you think she does. That is just my opinion, time will tell I guess. Brad is just being too in the publics face with this for it to be so. We shall see. It could be they are just banding together as family. I suspect she is getting some gratification out of knowing the real truth of what is going on with them and snickering on the side.

    Reply
  128. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @Kate:

    Why do we never get any plants from Team Aniston? Now that would be a plant I would be happy to see! Or maybe we already have one, who knows. Go on Jen, throw us a bone, we all think you’re a damn decent chick!

    Reply
  129. Putznasher said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @jill:

    Oh dear Lord, go back to JJ you desperate lonely freak!

    Reply
  130. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    I am on Jen’s side and got very offended when Ian said she was gay. So I just read hear now.

    Reply
  131. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    hear = here

    Reply
  132. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    Not at the fact she might be gay, but having Ian state that without having anything backing it up.

    Reply
  133. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    @Sunny:

    I think by that he meant “bi”. He should probably distinguish between the two as they are quite different. Why would you be offended to hear she is gay though? Other than thinking it was coming from Ange’s camp to put the blame on her which I would agree it was.

    Reply
  134. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Putznasher:

    Ha ha I didn’t see that comment! Do you think that might be the notorious JILL from JJ, loon captain supreme? Or perhaps just someone pulling our legs?!

    Reply
  135. Putznasher said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    I don’t know what’s going on exactly but if some people are suddenly showing up and being hateful and jerking around, it could be the work of those loser’s at Just Jolie who freak out if anyone ever says anything not nice about their beloved golden gods. They show up on various websites to stir sh*t up because they can’t handle the truth, that they worship a sociopath. And Jill is one of the main pieces of trash from there.

    Reply
  136. Putznasher said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    @Keane, I think it is her.

    Reply
  137. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @Sunny:

    For Ian to have said it he would have to have a source who has signed a release form which I assume would cover him with regard to legal issues too i.e. this person agrees to stand by their statement in court should be be sued. I’m not sure how web/book releases work but if I were an author I would get someone to sign something to that effect otherwise you could be getting stitched up all the time. But I agree that source was a plant from Ange’s team, as a lot of stories/sources have been lately. She is even getting to Ian!

    Reply
  138. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @Putznasher:

    Hm, for her that was VERY restrained though, you normally get pages of hate-filled diatribe from the lovely JILL! Plus she isn’t totally stupid, just mental, she normally has the odd, (obviously totally fallacious but nonetheless) argument to proffer too. I would be amazed if, with her intense devotion to the Brandge, that was all she saw fit to say!

    Reply
  139. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    I am not a insider, I don’t know celebritys lives, I am a married middle aged woman. I know who I like and who I don’t. I know people speculate on others sexuality, but I don’t feel comfortable doing that. I don’t know about Angie’s sexuality, but Ian had sources in that situation. It makes a differance.

    Reply
  140. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    I would love to believe that Brad has waken from his Angie induced sleep state, and come to realize what a major jackass he’s been….to Jennifer most of all. If he realizes this, and works on improving his character in reguards to how he treats those decent people in his life who truly loved him, then i’m all for a reunion between Jennifer and him. I would just hat so badly to think that he would be running to Jennifer as a means of escaping the mess he’s created with Angie, and once accomplished that, would once again become the selfish brat he’s proven himself to be. I just don’t want to see Jennifer, or any other woman, put through such a horrid and painful scenario….a second time. But…what will be will be. And it’s certain that Angie and Brad were a ToxicDuo who did nothing for one another but in the end drug each other down to depths they never imagined to find themselves in ….in film industry. IMO, Brad thought Angie was “above” Jennifer. Jen’s dad is a tv actor, Angie’s dad an Oscar winning film actor….so between the two, Angie should be able to raise Brad’s film image a bit higher than Jennifer, a television actress could do….wrong! He traded in the real classy and successful working actor for the drugged out manipulative witch…and is paying for it dearly now. I want to see borth Brad and Angie share the blame for what they’ve done as a pair – The Brand, it wasn’t all one sided and Brad knew very well what they were doing imo. I was appaled when i saw an interview with Brad during early days of AMH. It was mentioned that Plan B purchased this for Jennifer to play Marianne Peral….however….Brad stressed to the interviewer that Angie is a top notch FILM actress with many successes, and Jennifer is just a tv actress, therefore Angie could bring so much more to the making of the film than Jennifer ever could…..was he ever wrong. That film was a major BOMB due mostly to his selection of the starring role of Marrianne Pearl…..Someone needs to spank Brad….wait!!…i believe Angie has already done that and so much more!! :-) @Kate:

    Reply
  141. sama said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    UNBELIEVABLE AND THEY NAME JEN ALSO, I THOUGHT IT WAS A DONATION OF HIS FAMILY?????? THE ARTICLE SAYS SO NOT THIS ONE BUT THE ORIGINAL

    Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie Donate $1 Million to Hospital
    Sunday June 14, 2009

    Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt attend the ‘Inglourious Basterds’ Premiere at the Grand Theatre Lumiere during the 62nd Annual Cannes Film Festival on May 20, 2009 in Cannes, France.
    Tony Barson/WireImage CelebNews@Usmagazine.com! – Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie Donate $1 Million to Hospital ShareThisAngelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and his family donated $1 million to a Missouri hospital over the weekend.

    Brad’s bro, Doug, announced the generous contribution to St. John’s Hospital in his hometown of Springfield Saturday. The money will establish an endowment fund to pay children’s cancer specialists, the Springfield News-Leader reports.

    See Brad and Angelina’s family album — including pics of the twins!

    The hospital’s cancer treatment unit will be renamed the Jane Pitt Pediatric Cancer Center, in honor of Brad’s mom, who is passionate about children’s issues.

    Who are the most generous celebs?

    Once completed this summer, St. John’s Hospital will become one of six affiliates of the St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital (one of Jennifer Aniston’s favorite charities).

    The endowment fund will also go toward building a new pediatric unit, a 10-bedroom hospital-based Ronald McDonald house and doubling the size of the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

    See Brad and Angelina’s most romantic moments.

    St. John’s is matching the $1 million donation to help fund the expansion.

    Reply
  142. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    Sunny, i don’t believe anyone means any ill will to Jennifer by saying it’s been reported that she is bi-sexual, or that an insider claims that Brad convinced her during their marriage to engage in three-ways….everyone experiments with sex while growing up, whether they realize it or not, so it’s a natural part of being a human being. As to speculation about a celebrity’s sexual preference, well, imo, they are open to any and all speculation by the very public that supports their lifestyle. They are aware of the consequences when they choose to become a celebrity, or hope to anyway. Fans want to know all about their favorite entertainers, the good, the bad, and yes even the ugly. It’s nature to wonder about someone who is put on a giant screen for you to view every little wrinkle, hair, etc. They , in a way, sell rights to their lives to us who pay for the tickets to view their films, buy their books, rent their DVD’s. It’s a trade off they willingly take. There are laws in place to protect them, or any U.S. citizen from false accusations, harmful inuendos etc. That’s why speculation is just that….speculating. When it is said in Quotes, Joe Blow said, ” yadda, yadda, yadda” it’s the same as Joe Blow being here and telling us that statement in his own voice….and he can and will be held accountable in a court of law to prove what he’s said about a celebrity. No one means any harm to Jennifer Aniston, and i for one love her for what a terrific person she is….and i really don’t care if she is a lesbian, or bi-sexual or hetrosexual. It’s her inner qualities that i so admire. She’s a shining example of what a decent human being is….and the fame has not done one thing to change that….imo Thanks for your take on this Sunny, i hope i managed to explain how i feel about it a little better for you…. :-) @Sunny:

    Reply
  143. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    Right On Kate. Ron Howard comes across as a very decent , normal family man. Henry Winkler is also, very kind, decent, family man. I wish HW would show more appreciation for what they do, than to buy into the PR of someone such as Brad Pitt who is my idea of a not very good dad at all. A father is much more than a sperm donar….a dad picks you up when you fall and hurt yourself, a dad wipes your tears, a dad holds your hand while you learn to ride a two wheeled bike, a dad cries with you when your world falls apart…a dad is there. Congratulations to Ron Howard, a true dad and family man! Henry! You too!@Kate:

    Reply
  144. benjaminbutton14 said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. Hi PA I think where is says the Brad Pitt Family, I that includes Ange and his kids, and then other family members JMO

    Reply
  145. benjaminbutton14 said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. Eat your heart out Brad Pitt Jen is HOT

    Reply
  146. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yeah ITA, I just think it shouldn’t matter. It shouldn’t be a big deal what she is: straight, bi or gay. It’s just a biological characteristic like eye colour. Believe me when I say there are many very feminine women out there who just happen to be attracted to other women. It has no bearing on any other area of their life, all it affects is who they invite home for the evening. I would say Jen is a very open-minded, modern woman, and I don’t think she would mind people wondering if she was gay at all if it wasn’t for this need for her personal life to mirror the roles she plays. It shouldn’t matter in any context, HW or outside, but unfortunately it obviously still does.

    Reply
  147. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    PA, life is not being kind to Brad , he is getting his in more ways than he ever imagined. I am a big believer in forgiveness, and that includes Angelina if she pulls her life together for her children. I believe by now Brad is fully award of his mistakes. I know many believe Jen was to play MP, she wasn’t, she was never going to play that role. She did get the rights to it, and Brad did form Plan B for Jen to do more movies, but they had not decided on who would play MP. Jolie just took the role, from Jen in a sense because it was her project, but MP offered it to her. Brad was uncomfortable with it. just a little fyi there.

    @Sunny- IAN said in the chat he felt Jen would end up with a woman because he “believes” she has lesbian tendencies and because she does not get on with c**k and because she has never had a child and she is 40. Now I have plenty of friends that are lesbian with children so that makes no sense and I am sure if IAN thought about that he would agree.

    I am not really clear on why IAN keeps changin his mind on Jen. He first said she was asxual and Brad would never go back for that reason, then that she was into the ladies, then that they were reuniting, expect them to gegt ack together in the future and they were both bisexual. Then the news of the Sudanese came up and he seem to think Brad would end up with her and not Jen, they would just remain friends. Last it was Brad is all over the place he did not know and Jen with a woman.

    Imo Brad and Jen are deliberately putting out into to make sure no one knows what they are really doing and Jolie puts out fake sources to muddy the waters. I don’t beleive Brad and Jolie are together, I do believe Brad and Jen are friends and are close, more than that who knows.

    I don’t believe that Jen will be with a woman, I am not convinced that Brad is even bisexual beyond some experimenting, and same with Jen, I think they both are basically heter. jmo

    Reply
  148. Birthday Girl said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    @sama:

    What is the article suppose to prove?

    Reply
  149. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    I can see that, but the others did list the spouse.

    Reply
  150. Birthday Girl said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    He traded in the real classy and successful working actor for the drugged out manipulative witch…and is paying for it dearly now.

    How is he paying for it now? I also would like to know how you know for certain, Angelina is this witch you seem to potray her as? How would you know Jen is as classy as you seem to think she is? Her and Brad were both big potheads during their relationship. Maybe she’s not kissing her brother suggestively on the red carpert but, she’s not all that classy as some are making her out to be. Both women have their strengths and flaws. But, neither of them is perfect. Also, what is it they (BP/AJ)have supposedly done that ,they should share the blame for? I’m not nit picking just curious.

    Reply
  151. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    @sama:
    Sama, why does that bother you? This is a donation to help people , and I doubt Jen cares, she is close to Jane Pitt, they probably discussed it prior anyway. jmo

    Reply
  152. Birthday Girl said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    Jolie just took the role, from Jen in a sense because it was her project, but MP offered it to her. Brad was uncomfortable with it. just a little fyi there.

    This is not true. Where did you get this from? Brad formed Plan B so Jen would get more roles? Jen could and HAS gotten MORE roles without Plan B. I’m all for gossip and intelligent debate but, we need to get some accurate and reliable sources on where your coming up with some of this.

    Reply
  153. Birthday Girl said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    @Kate:

    She is also close with Angelina Jolie so is Doug. Just an FYI . Whether you believe it or not is up to you.

    Reply
  154. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    @Kate:You totally got what I meant. The fact that she might be gay doesn’t bother me, but the way Ian put it was what bothered me. Like Jen deserved to be treated bad by Brad and Angie because she was gay and not attracted to Brad. I’m not attracted to Brad and I’m not gay and if he never showers I can’t see Jen not wanting him all over her. I liked Jen and Brad together, but him and Angie just make me want to throw up.

    Reply
  155. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    Brad and Angie do have children together and I hope they are being parented right. It seems like no one is there for them. I hope that’s not true because life can look different from the outside, to what it really is.

    Reply
  156. Birthday Girl said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    I am not really clear on why IAN keeps changin his mind on Jen. He first said she was asxual and Brad would never go back for that reason, then that she was into the ladies, then that they were reuniting, expect them to gegt ack together in the future and they were both bisexual. Then the news of the Sudanese came up and he seem to think Brad would end up with her and not Jen, they would just remain friends. Last it was Brad is all over the place he did not know and Jen with a woman.

    I think you answered your own question. Why would someone keep making up stories? How convient of some to say “Her sexuality doesn’t matter” But, it’s okay for Angelina to be accused of beastiality etc.. There definitey is some sort of double standard here.

    Imo Brad and Jen are deliberately putting out into to make sure no one knows what they are really doing and Jolie puts out fake sources to muddy the waters. I don’t beleive Brad and Jolie are together, I do believe Brad and Jen are friends and are close, more than that who knows.

    I don’t believe that Jen will be with a woman, I am not convinced that Brad is even bisexual beyond some experimenting, and same with Jen, I think they both are basically heter

    If your still experimenting than your either gay or bi-sexual. Jennifer had a on/off relationship with Sheryl Crow and she’s not the only woman she has had “relations” with. But, either way I still like Jen she’s always very courteous and so is Angelina Jolie .. Is that hard to believe?

    As far as Angelina Jolie and Mr Pitt go, they are still on. There is nothing that Angelina would put out that, Brad would not give the go ahead on. They are very much still a couple and it’s not all for PR. Rest assured there will be an actual marriage between the two. Yes. They are also working behind the scenes on the more humanitarian side of things regarding Darfur. It’s not all talk and for PR purposes. Lastly, I’m not a plant for AJ or BP. I’m someone who might be in the know. I don’t have to lie the facts will speak for themselves.

    Thanks,
    BD

    Reply
  157. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    @Sunny:
    I don’t know Sunny, but I have a feeling that IAN is looking closely at everything. There are some sources he trusts completely and he has his reasons that we do not know. The ones he may not feel that way about could be ones that he has not had a long history with and they have not proven themselves over time. Toni is the one who said she dined with J the week before she came to IAN to spill the goods and said she slept with both of them and Brad told her he though Jen was a lesbian. Now the reason that does not work for me is that Brad and Jen have always claimed to talk it all out and it would defie logic that one would not sit down and put this on the table, espcially if he himself is sleeping with men and has been for 25 years, right? That just does not ring true and if Michael Cardoza ever got his pretty butt on the witness stand he would rip those Daddy Dear fruit of the loons right off of him. It just would not stick. As Bradley as said about himself, he is a “lying shit” and while he may have very well told Miss Toni that, it is total bullshit imo. There are too many people in the commnity that know the truth about Jen and her sexual exploits, just as Harikari noted. Brad, after all was not her first. lol :) Like a Virgin he he

    Reply
  158. Keane said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    @Sunny:

    ITA with you, we were all uncomfortable with it. I would bet my house that the source was instructed to act on behalf of Ange and here we go again making Jen the scapegoat for Brange’s bad behaviour. I can see why that would bother someone, especially if they were a fan of Jen. But I just think so many women in HW are gay or bi, it is very normal and i wouldn’t be surprised about it at all. There are so many lesbians in theatre, a much higher proportion than in other fields I have found. Being gay myself I could easily see her being that way but would understand that many people would find it hard to believe, as they usually do with me. I also think Brad is a very effeminate, pretty looking man. The one boyfriend I had in my life looked something like him. I think he would appeal to someone who liked girls. He used to (almost) appeal to me! I don’t know anyway, I’m not too bothered what Jen is at the end of the day but I think when it comes to it Ian will be pretty fair to her in his book. I think when he likes people he is.

    BTW Kate, did you mean to say that Jolie was with a woman? Or has Ian said that Jen is as well, I hadn’t heard that.

    Anyhoo, I’ll leave you all to have a good yak about it. Catch you all tomorrow! x

    Reply
  159. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @Sunny:
    I am not in that camp, I think the kids are fine, Brad I believe is good father, not like Opi, but for as much as he knows to be, and the kids are wll taken care of, loved, not abused, have loving grandparents. They may not get as much time as some kids with mom and dad, but nor do many kids in the US with parents that work 50-60 hours a week. Kids that are dropped off in dayvare at 6am, picked up at 6pm, taken home, bathed, eat dinner, bed time at 8pm, get 2 hours a day, now in comparison to an actor that may get to spend weeks at a time or days, that is no too bad.

    What are the chances the kids are seeing a lot of fighting in those big mansions? Seriously, they have nannies, probably not much. How bad can it really be for them?

    They are fine imo.

    Reply
  160. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @Keane:
    He said Jolie is with a woman right now , does not know about Brad, Jen was just speculation for the future.

    Reply
  161. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    @Sunny:
    LOL, that is funny but so true, they just look dirty together don’t they. Angelina looked really beautiful before she was with Brad. When she was in Alexander ,the Premier (well I guess if they were together 18 months he was with her then) she was stunning. Remember that , I have taken a lover at the end of 2003, if they were together for 18 months that is him. That is really dispicable on her part to make a blatant statement like that and drone on about the sex, and worse for Brad to put Jen through it. Even if she knew, what was she suppose to do in that situation. I can se how IAN make make the assumpiton Jen may not care and would think it was an easy out for her cause she preferred women, but often women do not address it because it is so painful, humilating, frightening to lose them, face the public, all of that, and all the while hoping it will just go away. In that case he has been with the skank for six very very long years, which explains why he looks the way he does.

    imo

    Reply
  162. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    I agree they would have discussed it. If they broke up because she was gay. He just would not assume something like maybe she prefers women. She might have told him she does, but I don’t think she did. It is to big a decision based on assumption. I’m sure Angie would not be worried if Jen was gay and Angie does still worry about Jen and Brad. Brad and Angie don’t look right together, but if they are happy it is better for every one for them to stay together, but I don’t see any happiness in either of them. I agree on the kids they are being cared for.

    Reply
  163. AIG said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    @Kate:Oh Kate. You are so Funny!!!!

    Reply
  164. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    @Sunny:
    Sure are some odd PR going on, last week the NE had that Brad is single story up top then it of course was moved on down as other stories came on above it, today they have movie it to the center again with that ugly IB picture of him, lol

    Hmm, wonder why. It is saying he is enjoying being single. I heard one report that said said once they are comfortable they will tell the kids. Sounds like that is coming round.

    I just watch Jen again in Derailed, I like her in that.

    Reply
  165. AIG said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    @Meah:MMmmmmm. Keane was chased off that site because nobody could stand her “holier than thou” attitude. Whoever she really is in real life, I prefer to believe Keane’s Cat over her version any day.

    Reply
  166. AIG said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    @Keane:Yeh, But the cat told me that you make it lick YOUR arse. Not Cool Keane.

    Reply
  167. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    Why is squinting like Clark Gable? It looks terrible on him. I think they are split, but not ready to acknowledge it.

    Reply
  168. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    @Kate:She did a fairly good job of playing a bad girl in Derailed. I like Clive Owen so I liked the film. A lot of people didn’t.

    Reply
  169. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    Didn’t Ian say that he thinks BP is going to look for an extremely sexy woman in the future, because he has ‘ discovered’ sex being with Angie and he wants more of it, more than AJ can give, and that he (Ian) thinks , he (BP) may end up with a Latina ? Now, I can see BP finding ‘ his new love’ while filming (later this summer ?) in South America ….. I can see him ‘ coming home’ with a new trophy woman : A very sexy, smoking hot and much younger woman, a South American movie star ? which would finish this whole Brangie thing off once and for all…….. Go Brad Go !@Kate:
    @Kate:
    @Kate:

    Reply
  170. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    sorry, meant to hit that button only once lol

    Reply
  171. Director, AIG said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    @Keane: You get paid for every word you write, right? If not, please attempt to hold yourself back from the wordy rhetoric?

    If you were the journalist/reporter/model/hot bitch you insist you are, surely you’d be able to practice efficiency with your words? Reading the long winded rhetoric is tedious at best.

    We get it Keane, you know it all and nobody knows it better than you do. Okay. Give it a rest honey.

    Take care and watch that bloody mouth of yours. You’re already treading murky legal waters.

    :-)

    Reply
  172. Sunny said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    “I have taken a lover” how pretentious.

    Reply
  173. benjaminbutton14 said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. I have seen photos of Doug Pitt but not of Julie Julie and her husband Rob have 1 son and twin girls but never seen a photo of them. She apparently stated that she likes to keep out of the media. Good thought especially with all this shit going on.

    Reply
  174. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    He did, but Brad is a hopeless romantic, he falls in love with love, and how does one control that? He said he believes Brad will end up with someone more sexy that Angie. It seems to change weekly. I tend to think he will calm down a bit once he gets his own identity back because having a new sex bomb for a stepmother is not likely jmo , not likely in that they would not want any part of it and he is smart enough to know that will not work after what he has been through. At some point he has to grow up and choose a woman who is , well a classy lady, whoever that may be, and not 23 years old. lol

    Reply
  175. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Oh definately! I say good for Julie! I remember the report of Julie and Angie getting into a rather roudy fight awhile back. I applaud her for not taking any gruff from Angie. Jane and Bill Pitt must be heartbroken at how their youngest son’s life has turned out. They love Jennifer, and think of her as another daughter. Not only did their son committ adultry with Angie, but he flaunted it in the public eye. This affected Jennifer, but it also reflected onto Brads family, Mom Jane, Dad Bill, Brother Doug, and Sister Julie. He has a lot to make up for

    Reply
  176. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Julie has been to many of the premiers, both with Brad and Jen and with Brad and Angelina. She is a pretty girl.

    Too bad Clive is married, he and Jen were so nice together in Derailed.

    Reply
  177. benjaminbutton14 said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    @Kate:
    bb14. I apologize I got it wrong.

    Reply
  178. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Someone in the press once described Brad Pitt as a monogamous sexual addict. Here he is in the middle of his life, about to start the descent into older age range, and he’s still trying to find The Woman. It’s sad actually. To me it seems he is looking for someone else to resolve his personal issues so he can find peace in life. There is no “perfect woman” or man for that matter. Life is all about comprimise, respect and genuinely caring about your partner. Brad didn’t show Jennifer any of those qualities. And it now appears he isn’t showing them to Angie either. Angie isn’t an angel, but neither is Brad by any means. (OMG am i taking up for EvilAngie here?) I just get so annoyed when i see Brad skate through messing up other people’s lives with nary a scratch on him. Brad is a selfish ass, an sexually obsessed man always on the look out for The Woman who can satisfy his lustf, he never does the right thing imo of telling his commited partner that he feels “our time has come to an end, we need to separate”..BEFORE he chases the newest sex partner. Seems to me he falls in love AFTER he’s had sex with them several times….sort of like buying a used car yano…..give it a few spins around the block before you trade in the old model….don’t want to make a mistake do we?….lol….anyway….JMO@Kate:

    Reply
  179. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    @Sunny:
    Not only that, but when people starting guessing , Colin, no, Ethan, no, she said, oh, I really hope know one figures out who it is.

    There was more to the comment but that is all I remember. Can you imagine, and if Jen knew all along. Now SR indicated to me the reason Jen could never say anything when Jolie was making her snotty comments in the press was because if she did, Jolie would expose that she was bisexual and that she knew about them so she had to go along with whatever Jolie dished out. Brad, if that is true, supported that, it would seem. When someone is caught up in the midst of lust they do stupid things, when it wears off, they have regrets. People keep saying Brad got suckered in, imo he knew exactly what he was doing and wanted to do it,and never tried to stop it. 18 months is very long time to carry on June 2003 -Dec 2004. wow. So it is now reall these past 4/12 years, it is 6 years.

    Reply
  180. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Got what wrong?

    Reply
  181. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, but PA, I bet he would have stayed with Ange if she was not so messed up. I think the guy did fall in love with her, head over and all, but who can live with all that? Honestly, and if they were together that long it is not like they jumped right into kids, she just did not slip until after she had Shiloh. Maybe having a baby and her mother dying pushed her back to where she was, or, maybe she never really wanted him, and she really does prefer women.

    Perhaps now he knows better what he wants.

    Reply
  182. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate , I know you are right, but does he know too ? lol ….. I bet you, he is going to have another sex bomb, only younger ……. he is just starting ‘ discovering ‘ …… maybe the one after the next one could be Mrs Right, I doubt. though….. think he is going to entertain us for years to come ….he loves too much being in control ….. after controlling Jolie, the stakes (thrill) getting higher and higher…. he is not going to go back to warm cocoa any time soon …. Jolie looked like a big mess in Cannes, like a puppy listening to her masters voice, he has her under his thumb !

    Reply
  183. Patty Anne said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:19 pm

    In four short years…the public has seen Brad and Angie ride the fast train to Hell. Angie looked out of her mind drunk or on drugs at Canne…one photo shows her with one eye half shut the other wide open, and neither eye was looking in the same direction…no muscle control over the direction imo. She would have been horrified at that photo just a year ago, when she still had self esteem. Brad has aged enormously though, but compared with Angie, it is she who appears to have had the life sucked out of her. ToxicDuo is such an appropriate term for their pairing. I never felt “right” about them from day one, nothing to do with Team this and Team that….when i’d see them together, it just gave me a very strange , un right feeling. Like when you hear a loud , sudden noise and you hold your breathe while you wait for it to repeat? I think sunny mentioned having that same sensation. Something was never right with their pairing, and i believe they knew it as well, but for some unknown reason they felt they were powerful enough to make it work. They were wrong. Reading about Z’s possibly having RAD, and seeing how Shiloh acts either extremely shy or angry, Maddox looks to me as if he just wants a knife, a gang, and a bike, Pax, ah, poor Pax, a stranger in his own home. The twins? they are blank chalkboards to me. Very strange, and not happy family imo. What do they call the many nannies who come and go from their lives? Mommy Nannie One, Two , Three?….poor kids. I wish Micky would make up his mind about writing the book, and just do it….i’d pay $100 for one copy!

    Reply
  184. backalleyknees said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    @Kate:
    She really does have him over a barrel though doesn’t she? I mean, he is going to look a lot worse than she will coming out of a split. I think he would try and keep the darker stuff quiet for a couple of reasons 1) his kids. I have no doubt that he loves them very much. 2) If all the bad behavior of either of them comes to light, people will ask, “if you knew about it then why did you stay and continue to live an unhealthy lifestyle when you should’ve looked out for your kids?” They could get away with business like this if they were a normal citizen, not a celebrity. Their hubris will be their downfall. The sly comments that always played at an inside joke around the beginning of the mess will be used to help burn them down. I balk at the gall of these two. Maybe its human nature, or maybe its just my twisted nature that when a person (anyone, celebrity/acquaintance/boss/co-worker) gets too high and mighty and plays you for a fool, I find it amusing to watch the facade start to crack, as it eventually will. Anyway back OT, neither of them can afford to come out of this any other way than smelling like roses and Jolie knows that. She can get away with playing the broken hearted crusader and make BP look heartless if he leaves her for someone else. Because what’s he going to do? Dish the bad shit? No way. Again, bite.in.ass.

    Reply
  185. backalleyknees said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    I wonder if “Under my Thumb” by The Stones is his theme song?

    Reply
  186. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    well said…. and I would pay $ 101 for the book ! lol

    Reply
  187. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    yes, exactly … that’s what’s going on….. and he has the time of his life right now…. he has smelled the power of control and he is not giving it up any time soon.

    Reply
  188. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    I actually like that song a lot lol

    Reply
  189. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    Well let’s hope not, and what PA says about Angelina. They both really need to get their lives together for their beautiful children. You know Brad must have a dark demon driving that congential sadness if he can not get it together. He has all he has ever wanted, the fame, fortune, the children, all except what? What is missing for him? Something has to be for him to be on this merry go round. IAN said that In Touch was going to break a story this week concerning lawyers for both sides, that it would be a big story, so maybe they are coming to some kind of an agreement for the children. If all the stories are true about Angelina, I do hope Brad gets the kids until she can get her life together. Not forever, I believe she loves her children and I don’t want to see her lose them permanently, but just til she can work things out for herself safely. It should really be what is best for the children, and I would love to see her slack off from films , be more of a mom and devoted to her causes, that I believe is really what he calling is. She really does not need Hollywood anymore. It is not good for her, and I say that as support woman to woman, in case anyone is wondering, mother to mother. I really do hope she can pull it together, she is only 34 years old, she is so young still. There s always hope, and the same for Pitt, otherwise what chance do the children really have.

    Reply
  190. backalleyknees said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Me too. Give a listen to the words again and you can see some parallels.

    Reply
  191. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    Yes I totally agree with you, he can in no way be accused of that..again! lol and not with children. I think many forget about Brad and his roots. He grew up where things were just sort of unspoken. Personal issues were kept private. People just did not air ther dirty laundry. He was highly offended when President Clinton did it with Lewinsky. I don’t Brad will ever say one bad word about the mother of his children, he has never said a bad word about Jen. However, he will do as one article has suggested what Guy Ritchie did, he will leak through tabloids undisirable things about Angelina to the press that will make people sympathetic to him when they announce the split. Just like now he is leaking an alliagiance between him and Jen so the masses will not remember any bad feelings from that split. All is well , Jen and Brad are friends, so surely so will be Brad and Angelina in the future, what a guy. lol All about image, he is going to try and retain his, but, IAN is going to change that with the 18 month revelation. hehe.

    Reply
  192. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    @Kate:

    Yeah, I wished they would listen to your warm and thoughtful thoughts, but people don’t often seem to see what’s right in front of them and keep looking for answers in wrong directions….. I agree with you, she doesn’t need HW anymore, and , if I believe her, she never liked it anyway, so all she needs to do is go to Portugal ( or anywhere else she pleases) live a beautiful life with her children, she got the money to do anything she wants in life ( I can’t even imagine what that must be like lol) …… the only tiny little bitsy weeny little thing she needs to do is : Get healthy . Mentally and physically . Have some willpower for c sakes…

    Reply
  193. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    BTW… Who thinks that BP is all alone in LA right now ? Sitting on his couch texting JA ? Or maybe on his blackberry ( the one he fished out the toilet ) to AJ ? Maybe he is running with Cloon , much more likely lol

    Reply
  194. Kate said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Totally, and I believe, unlike some that Angelina is intelligent, she is self taught and well read. She speaks well and holds her own with digintries that most young women her age without an education would be intimidated by. I do wish she would focus on those things that she is so interested in and maybe just invest her money wisely, she could do circuit talks like Clinton and make plenty and be a good mother.

    Why text, what is wrong with talking on the phone anymore. lol

    Nite

    Reply
  195. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    @Kate:

    nite lol

    Reply
  196. TobyKat said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    @Kate:
    I don’t think that will happen. Sorry, in my opinion I belive she is too narcissistic.
    Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the diagnostic classification system used in the United States, as “a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and a lack of empathy.”
    The narcissist is described as turning inward for gratification rather than depending on others, and as being excessively preoccupied with issues of personal adequacy, power, and prestige. Narcissistic personality disorder is closely linked to self-centeredness. It is also colloquially referred to as “the god complex”.

    Reply
  197. justhelping said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    Hello everyone. Been away. Kinda focused on the Iran elections. I am in support of the Green Revolution and am currently twitting with many students at Tehran University. Anyone in support of Mousavi, I ask if you could please include #iranelection at the end of your tweets. I would really appreciate that as well as Iranians who are getting beaten. I am not sure if anyone twitters, but I thought I would try. Ahmadinejad is a dangerous man, for all of us. Thanks and sorry to interrupt. I’ll keep checking in.

    Reply
  198. Different Guest said on June 14th, 2009 at 9:38 pm

    @TobyKat:I’m afraid I agree with you Tobykat. I really don’t think she’s capable of getting it together for her children. I really don’t think she’s going to listen anyone in regard to what might be best for the children particularly if there are disabilities involved. That said, I also think Brad is a particularly devoted father. I’m not saying they don’t love their children, but that the children are not a priority, their careers and images are.

    Reply
  199. justhelping said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    Hillary Clinton and Angelina Jolie to speak to Anderson Cooper sometime this week.

    Reply
  200. The Illuminati said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    You pathetic peons will love our protege Angelina. Did you lowly serfs know we engineered the entire digital television transition so we can easily beam our pervasive mind control signals into your primitive cerebellic puddles of grey goo and observe your reactions with the hidden cameras inside of your HDTV’s and converter boxes? Why do you think we gave away all those free coupons?

    Your minds are already our property and we are subliminally programming you biological lumps of twaddle with operant conditioning memes that will make you do everything we see fit. We are hereby commanding you to worship Angelina as your goddess because she is the pinnacle of feminine perfection in our New World Order.

    From this moment forward there is no love except the love of Angelina.

    Reply
  201. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    @justhelping:

    Ok, just can’t help thinking how funny this this , both talking to A Cooper about their man (wink wink ) same show , same day ? How so very civilized … lol

    Reply
  202. unknownxcat said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    I’M SO GLAD U ALL HAVE EVERYTHING FIGURED OUT. I’M SURE BRAD AND ANGIE ARE SO PLEASED U CARE.
    ~ J.E.M.

    Reply
  203. justhelping said on June 14th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    That’s what I told my husband. I wonder if AJ will wear her stained dress? We should send Anderson emails asking if they fought over who gave Willy a better blow job. @Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  204. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    @justhelping:

    Looking forward to her pseudo-royal attitude talking about ‘ raising awareness ‘ by oversimplifying the problems in some exotic locale ……. lol please let us know date and time …. don’t want to miss it…

    Reply
  205. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    @justhelping:

    also, there is somebody here looking desperate for a bulb ….. ROFL

    Reply
  206. Ms Agatha said on June 14th, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    looking for a light source I guess….

    Reply
  207. TobyKat said on June 14th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Looks like it will be on the same show. Oh, I’d love to be a fly on the wall. AJ may be younger but i’d put my money on Hillary.
    http://allthingshillaryclinton.blogspot.com/

    Reply
  208. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:20 am

    To Keane!

    Strange but were did I say I don`t believe the story about the 14 million dollars sale of the twin picture? I do because it is a proven fact. While I have never heard of the claim that Jolie and Pitt get a certain percentage of pap pix. You answered me with a generalisation but couldn`t provede a link. Fact is that a pap agency themself confirmed that Spears had a deal with them! Do you see the difference between a claim that is unproven and a fact?

    Reply
  209. unknownxcat said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:27 am

    I really think AJ and Hillary should get nekkid and wrestle it out with some hot oil. Bill and Brad should just watch while smoking cigars.

    Reply
  210. benjaminbutton14 said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:13 am

    bb14. This is from Down Under in one of our mags just out. Apparently despite rumours that Brad and Jen didn’t meet up at the Hotel, they did according to the Hotel Manager. He said they were together. I know it is true I don’t get paid for lying or telling the truth, but they were here for a good 2 hours. Jens Limo driver stated that when they reached the Hotel Jen rang Brad and said “I’m here.” Jen has always made sure that the door would be open if Brad wanted to pick up where they left off. After Brad found out thru his Mother Jane that Jen was happy to meet up they began to talk on the phone about it. Brad discovered how upset Jen really was after they split up says an insider I think he’d always figured she coped well because she seemed so upbeat but Jane told Brad the truth. Jen has been carefully planning for the moment when she can see Brad openingly says a source close to the actress “Her dreams of being able to be seen with Brad again are coming true.” As stated, Ange has now decided to forget about Brad and move on. They have been sleeping in separate houses on the estate and staying clear of each other.

    Reply
  211. benjaminbutton14 said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:19 am

    @Kate:
    bb14. Sorry Kate it was something about the Pitts donating the money I read it wrong, I always believe when I’;m wrong I apologize. That’s what it was about.

    Reply
  212. mooki said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:58 am

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1193105/Katie-Holmes-limbers-incredibly-long-legs-guest-appearance-TV-dance-show.html

    What’s this about Katie Holmes “performing” on So You Think You Can Dance? Did Nigel Lythgoe sell out to the Scilons? Ian, we need confirmation of the TomKat breakup so we can ‘poon it to the press.

    Reply
  213. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:37 am

    @Director, AIG:

    Oh bless you, you’re feeling so bitter and desperate now aren’t you?! Just nothing will work will it, you just can’t shut people up. Yep we all “know our rights” just like Madame Jolie; the right to free speech of course. Ms Jolie may think she can control the press, but she can’t control people unfortunately. And just for the record re: Dlisted. I began commmenting on gossip boards on that site and enjoyed it as a way of entertaining myself. I love MK and some of the comments were hilarious. I did not however like a lot of the stuff that was considered acceptable there such as jeering and abusing a young mother who was about to die, laughing at a young girl for being slightly on the plump side and so on. So while there were a lot of cool people there and some pop in here from time to time, it is not a place I would go back to. It also became a bit boring and repetitive after a while and as funny as MK is, I wanted to find out about what was going on behind the PR facade. Nobody “chased me out”, I just decided to stop commenting because I didn’t want to any more. I much prefer the comments section here. And I’m still in touch with plenty of people on that site who come here. So try as you might to tar me with whatever brush you can think of, that one won’t stick I’m afraid. And as I’ve said about a hundred times now, I have no interest in what others think of me, especially people that I have no respect for. I only wish to be thought well of by people I think well of and have no interest in toning down what I say so I can appeal to more people. It’s called integrity, you should try it some time. And as for treading “murky legal waters” well you will be reassured to know I have consulted a top notch lawyer over this site for advice so I understand my legal postion. The good thing is I have not broken the law, as someone from your gang already has. So if you’re planning on serving me legal papers, I suggest you prepare yourself for a little legal action (of the criminal variety) of your own.

    Reply
  214. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:42 am

    @Director, AIG:

    Oh and I have never said that I am nor ever have been a journalist, reporter or model, do try to keep up! Although I am considering going into the former field perhaps. I need to talk to some of my friends about what it is like though, I suspect the life wouldn’t be much better than in TV production so it might not be a go-er. Don’t worry though, if I do decide to go into that field, I will make sure I talk about Angelina Jolie at every available opportunity! That will make you all happy now won’t it?

    Reply
  215. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:46 am

    @Sunny:

    ITA. Its a bit like when she said “My mother bought me my first daggers when I was 11 or 12″. Her “first daggers”? What was she living in an Elizabethan play?! And her “first” ones, like some sort of sexual rite of passage, like losing her knife virginity?! Presumably she has now graduated on to more adult, grown up dagger relationships! Good God, it’s all about the penis isn’t it? Knives = phalluses = Ange is a sex goddess. Whatever, grow up Angelina!

    Reply
  216. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:52 am

    @Kate:

    So you think that lover was Brad? I thought it was earlier than that? And I thought she had more than one of them, at least two men? I always thought one of them was probably JLM. There was a break up with his girlfriend Lisa Faulkner which may have happened around that time. And then there are the rumours that he thought Shiloh was his. It would fit wouldn’t it? I’m not sure about the time frame though, might be a different time entirely. Do you know?

    Reply
  217. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    @mia:

    When did I say I thought you didn’t? I never said that. What does that have to do with anything? And how do you know it is a “proven fact” as a matter of interest? Mia, there are many, many things that go on in the world which are known by people but are not openly stated to the general public. It would not be in the pap agency or Brangelina’s interest to reveal they have a deal, so I can’t provide you with the proof you seek. It may well be revealed publicly by someone party to the information at a later stage though, these things often come out eventually. If you only believe things that you have hard proof for then why come to these sites at all? Most stories are based on what sources say about people/events as opposed to coming from the horse’s mouth. And BTW, just because something comes from the horse’s mouth, doesn’t mean it is true either. Celebs and their PRs lie all the time.

    Reply
  218. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:07 am

    Yikes! I’ve been out bid! lol@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  219. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:13 am

    @justhelping:

    Yep me too justhelping, Iran is one step away from Zimbabwe at the moment in terms of democractic elections it seems. I was approached by a woman in London talking about human rights in Iran and felt sick about what we discussed. Their system of crime and punishment is not dissimilar to Taliban-governed Afghanistan, it is truly repulsive. I feel so badly for the Iranian people. It must be appalling to live under such a government.

    Reply
  220. Gitano said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Re “The Illuminati Said” at 10:33 PM: funny but not far from the truth.

    Reply
  221. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:21 am

    @TobyKat:

    Yes I agree, I don’t know about personality disorders or whether she suffers from one but I do think what she cares about most in life is fame, money and power. The look of hatred she gave Anne Hathaway when she won the award over her said it all to me. And I do think she cares about her HW career, I think that was the ulterior motive for hooking up with Brad and doing all the incessant PR ever since. She wanted to be Queen of HW and get first pick at all the roles. And I think the children were probably just tools in that scheme too. But yeah I agree with Kate that she wants to conquer the political world next, but she wants to conquer HW first for sure. I can’t say for sure what drives her personally to do all this but my guess would be that she is emotionally detached from people, doesn’t feel love so doesn’t understand how much more important that is in life than achieving things. There is a void in her life where love should be so she tries to fill it up with her career, status and personal achievements. It may be due to some sort of personality disorder but I think there are people in the world who care more about their career/fame than their personal lives and will do anything to achieve/maintain it (Posh Spice for one), so I don’t think it is necessarily so. I think she gets a buzz or a thrill from what she does which she gets more from than her relationships. I would guess she has been damaged in some way because of this but again it is jusst a theory. I personally just can’t understand people who care more about career than love because I am the exact opposite. JMO.

    Reply
  222. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:21 am

    Angie did make the comment around the time everyone was speculating she and Brad were in a sexual affair that , “I don’t need Brad Pitt, i have several lovers right now”. So much for class@Keane:

    Reply
  223. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:24 am

    @Gitano:

    Yep its all about the cult of Angelina as the world’s most best/perfect woman hey? Mind control is the strongest weapon of someone trying to establish a dictatorship. Which is ironic seeing as this leader is supposed to be a champion of human rights.

    Reply
  224. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    @Different Guest:
    Hi Different Guest and TobyKat: I agree with both of you – I would like to agree with Kate but I think she is projecting her own goodness onto the evil Ms. Jolie and hapless Mr. Pitt. :P

    Reply
  225. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    @justhelping:
    Are they going to discuss their “shared” interest aka Kill-Bill Clinton? :D

    Reply
  226. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:09 am

    @ladybert62:

    You are too funny as ever!x

    Reply
  227. faction II said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    Lokks like X is a programmed monarch slave. Like many celebrities.

    Reply
  228. fresca said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @mia:Angelina is mentally ill, her father said it, she admitted it, her mother had her committed at one point and she wears pee-stained clothes proudly, if that wasnt enough proof! So why would she bother brushing their hair or worry about their clothes? She is mentally unstable. She has them always eating junk food so they dont cry around her for the photo ops;

    Reply
  229. mooki said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:18 am

    @fresca:

    I’m also thinking that Jon Voight may be a bit mentally off as well (could Angie have inherited that gene from him?)

    Reply
  230. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,333476,00.html

    Null and Voight
    Jon Voight says Angelina needs to get help. The actor says his daughter has ”mental problems,” that he knew her marriage to Billy Bob Thornton was doomed, and that he hasn’t seen his grandson
    More

    MENTAL MOM? Voight says he has yet to see Angelina’s year-old son
    Angelina Jolie: Ben-Ari Finegold / London Entertainment/Splash News/Newscom
    All AboutAngelina Jolie

    By Gary Susman Gary Susman
    In an emotional interview on Thursday’s ”Access Hollywood,” Jon Voight went public about his estrangement from daughter Angelina Jolie, pleading with her fans and handlers to see that she gets help for unspecified ”mental problems” now that she’s split with husband Billy Bob Thornton. He blamed himself for failure to act on her behalf, and he also begged his daughter to let him see his grandchild, the baby she and Thornton adopted just months before she filed for divorce last month.

    Voight says his daughter, who won an Oscar for playing a mental patient in ”Girl, Interrupted,” began showing signs of mental illness as an infant. (He divorced Jolie’s mother before their daughter was a year old but says he remained a presence in her life.) He said he was ”brokenhearted…because I’ve been trying to reach my daughter and get her help, and I have failed and I’m sorry. Really I haven’t come forward and addressed the serious mental problems she has spoken about so candidly to the press over the years, but I’ve tried behind the scenes in every way.”

    He said he had confronted his daughter a number of times. During the making of ”Girl,” he said she told him, ”You can’t help me! You can’t help my pain!” They had a brief reconciliation when they worked together on ”Lara Croft: Tomb Raider,” but it didn’t last. He said he tried to greet her recently at a Hollywood party, but her manager blocked him and said, ”She doesn’t want to see you.” (The manager tells the story differently, telling ”Access Hollywood” that he interceded because Voight ”aggressively, physically grabbed her against her will.”)

    Because of his estrangement from his daughter, Voight said he hadn’t yet seen his grandson, Maddox, the year-old Cambodian boy Jolie and Thornton brought back to the U.S. in May. ”That is the greatest pain,” he said. ”I’d love to help out with the baby.”

    Billy Bob Thornton, Voight’s son-in-law of two years, has problems too, Voight said. ”I never had the feeling that they were going to make it because of both of their serious problems, and they’ve both been very public about them, so I never really held out any hope.”

    Jolie responded to Voight’s comments in a statement, saying ”I don’t want to make public the reasons for my bad relationship with my father. I will only say that, like every child, [brother] Jamie and I would have loved to have had a warm and loving relationship with our dad. After all these years, I have determined that it is not healthy for me to be around my father, especially now that I am responsible for my own child.”

    Jolie is currently preparing to shoot the ”Tomb Raider” sequel, and producer Lawrence Gordon told ”Access Hollywood” that he was unaware of any problems she had that would jeopardize the big-budget franchise. ”I have an excellent team around her,” Gordon said. ”If there was a problem, I would know it.”

    So…..the producer had her watched for signs of “trouble” while making Tomb Raider? Well, well. It’s not that big a secret after all….so….someone GET HER PROFFESSIONAL HELP…puhleezze!!

    Reply
  231. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    @fresca:

    I just think Brad and Ange have stylists, hairdressers and make-up artists and the kids just have nannies. That is why the former are so immaculatey turned out at photo opps and the latter are not!

    Reply
  232. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    @Keane:

    You ask me how I know that it is “a proven fact” that the twin pictures were sold for a huge figure? Well because the international photo agency that oversaw the deal and People mag who bought the pictures confirmed it. I would view that as enough proof! By the way what I DID read was that Brangelina used to set up photo ops in order to limit the paprazzi stalking. They agreed to one phot oportunity let`s say in India in exchange for being left alone by the paps for the rest of their stay. Looks like it was their way of dealing with the contsant pap harrassment. And believe me no pap agency that pays for the travel costs of their employees would be happy about their photographers returning empty handed. The same goes for freelancers that have to finance their own expenses.

    And as for rumors that aren`t openly discussed well they are hearsay until proven true!

    Reply
  233. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    @Patty Anne:

    See that is exactly why I think Mr Voight is an a.ss! He is no better than Lindsay Lohan`s dad. Hell if my kid had mental problems the last thing I would do is discuss that on national television and put him or her under even more stress than she already is! Really why jeopardize your own kids`s career and family just for the sake of public aproval? This is the LAST thing an unstable child -no matter how old he or she might be needs.

    Reply
  234. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:57 am

    @mia:
    Sometimes mia, when a parent is so concerned, and has made every attempt to help a mentally ill child to no avail ( the money and power of AJ could hinder any attempts) a public intervention might have been the parent’s only recourse , in his mind. Marcia Lynne, AJ’s mom, admitted her to a mental institution when she was much younger, but AJ signed herself out without treatment just three days later. It will not go away with time, or heal itself. Sometimes the end product justifies the means to get there. For the safety of AJ, the kids, and even other people in her immediate life. One never knows with any certainty just what a mentally ill person is capable of doing, and some do pretty horrendous acts to harm themselves, and others…i pray someone will convince Angie to seek proper mental health care, for the sake of those six little ones if not for AJ’s sake. She’s on a fast sliding downhill run now it seems…..imo

    Reply
  235. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:58 am

    @mia:

    So it must be true right? Because People never lie to protect their money makers do they? This is what I’m trying to explain to you Mia, people in the media lie about things all the time. You have to look at what their agenda might be. Unless you’ve seen a cheque written out to Ms Angelina Jolie and Mr Brad Pitt for 14 million dollars from People magazine that is not a proven fact at all. You have to try to understand that just because someone says something, it doesn’t mean it is the truth. Celebrities, PRs and the publications whose business depends on them lie all the time to protect their money-making interests. I have no idea whether Brange got $14 million or not because I was not involved in that transaction and neither were you. There have been suggestions on this board that they might not have got all of that money because MAYBE People weren’t getting exactly what they thought they were paying for. I don’t know this for a fact obviously but that has been the implication here. And if that was the case, do you really think People would come out and tell the world that and tell the world why? No way. They will protect their money-makers and protect their own business. It wouldn’t do them or Brangelina any favours to reveal that if it indeed was the case. You have to try to understand the world is nowhere near as straightforward and clear cut as you think it is, especially when there is a LOT of money involved. Many, many people in many areas of society lie on a daily basis to protect their own interests. Unfortunately we are far from living in a society where truth reigns and everything everyone does is transparent.

    Reply
  236. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 11:09 am

    http://sweetangelinajolie.blogspot.com/2009/05/angelina-jolie_03.html

    April 1999

    Nuptials and a Tattoo with Billy Bob
    Jolie checks herself into the UCLA Medical Center’s Neuropsychiatric Institute for three days following a nervous breakdown. Shortly after her release, on May 5, the 24-year-old actress marries her Pushing Tin costar Billy Bob Thornton, 44, in a $189 Las Vegas ceremony. While Thornton’s girlfriend at the time, Laura Dern, is stunned, Jolie shows her commitment by having his name tattooed on her left shoulder.

    So, Angie checks herself into UCLA Med Center’s Neuropshchiatric Institute? Mental Hospital folks?

    Reply
  237. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 11:18 am

    @Keane:

    “people in the media lie about things all the time. You have to look at what their agenda might be. ”
    Now apply this to Ian and I totally agree with you! Although it surprises me that you suddenly ask for proof and act as if you were totally objective when you are ready to believe every single claim that Ian and or his sources put out without any proof. And really the fact that Ian once CLAIMED that he wanted one source (the Sudanese) to sign a release form is no proof that everything all his sources ever said about Jolie is true. I am sure (ex) members of their staff have their own agenda and reasons why they would want to hurt their (ex)employers.

    By the way I left out the exact figure (14 miilion) on purpose the seond time around because A HUGE SUM was confirmed and this amount was strongly speculated but confirmed by neither party! Did I make it clear enough for you this time?

    Reply
  238. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    @mia:

    Nope because you initially said $14 million which is an exact figure and that that was a “proven fact”. This is what you said:

    “were did I say I don`t believe the story about the 14 million dollars sale of the twin picture? I do because it is a proven fact.”

    That’s a totally categorical statement. The next time you revised it to a “HUGE SUM” because you realised the $14 million hadn’t been confirmed by anybody, it had just been speculated on by people and you had taken it as fact (like a lot of people have) even though there actually hasn’t been a confirmation of the precise figure at all it seems. A “huge sum” could be anything from $7 million to $100 million to a billion” couldn’t it? It could literally be anything. Nobody knows. Do you see how shaky the supposed “proven facts” are now Mia? You have to understand that most of the media world is not a place where “proven facts” necessarily abound. If someone says it is taken as the truth, without question and without anyone thinking about it too deeply. That’s how people get away with so much. The public on the whole don’t question too much about what they hear and rumours or PR stories are accepted as fact.

    And what made you think I believe every story Ian has posted here? If you’d been reading the threads over the past few weeks I have said I actually don’t believe much of what has been written from “Toni”’s revelations about Jen’s sexuality onwards. I think most of them have been planted by AJ’s camp because they are clearly designed to get sympathy for her and make Jen the scapegoat again. I think Ian is being bamboozled with too many sources and information right now, as he has said. And yes of course staff members, colleagues, associates may also have an agenda, but you have to make a judgment about who has more to gain/lose than anybody else by lying? Sources telling Ian info on Ange may stand to lose their employment, their reputation and professional standing and gain what exactly? You genuinely think Ian has the resources to pay them? He is not a national newspaper. Ange and team sending her associates to leak positive or sympathy-garnering stories about her may help to save her career and thus protect not just her finanical interests but all the companies/professionals who make money out of her. That’s a big old motivation to lie. The only motivation people may have to sell negative stories on Ange is if they don’t like her and want to stitch her up, which is why he has to corroborate what they are saying with other independent sources. If he can do that then he has grounds to go ahead and publish, if he doesn’t then he is just opening himself up to being sued which is not, I suspect, his aim. Did I make it clear enough for you this time?

    Reply
  239. Tidbit said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    You know I don’t particularly care one way or the other about AJ. BUT I must say, Ian is printing what is most likely false information for the sole purpose of getting hits and you all are buying into it. Think people. Think about some of the things he has printed. They make no sense. And if they were true, Angie and Brad could trace it back to the source since things are so specific and that source would most likely be fired. Or at least not be in the inner circle.
    You are all like lemmings blindly following anything he writes whether it is true or not.

    Reply
  240. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    @Keane:

    You you made yourself perfectly clear: you doubt any neagtive stories about Jen and blame Jolie for being the source of them while you belive such crazy accusations as bestiality, incest and other horror stories about Jolie without a single proof. Yes that makes sense! Now you have proven your objectivity at last – well not exactly!

    Reply
  241. Kate said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @mooki:
    Hi Mooki,

    Angelina made that statement in a interview , she said she felt he was the one that was mentally ill, not her. Did you see that interview?

    Reply
  242. Kate said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    @Gitano:
    lol that was funny, I have seen that theory a few months back on FF I think. Someone claimed that Brad also is part of a secret society. I didn’t read the whole thread just the opening post but it was close to that.

    Reply
  243. Kate said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @Keane:
    She first made the statement around the end of 2003 , that is the first I see it in the press, so it could be Brad I suppose, many think it is. I guess that depends on if we believe the affair was 18 months. Jury is out on that for me.

    Reply
  244. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    http://www.celebitchy.com/55630/brad_pitt_angelina_jolie_donate_1_million_to_missouri_hospital/

    As the years go buy on the Jolie-Pitt relationship, one thing’s for certain – Angelina has been a good influence on Brad’s charitable giving, especially for local issues affecting his home state of Missouri. At the end of 2008, Brad (through the Jolie-Pitt Foundation) donated $200,000 to the Missouri charity Force For Good, which gives money, school supplies, food and clothing to underprivileged kids in the Springfield area. Then, a few months ago, Brad and his brother Doug worked out a $600,000 donation to Drury University to make the on-campus event center meet the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Environmental Energy and Design (LEED) gold standards. The center will also be named after Brad’s dad, William A. Pitt.

    So perhaps Doug and Brad were worried their mom would feel left out. Jane Pitt needed something named after her too, right? So Brad, Angelina and the rest of the Pitt family have worked out a $1 million donation to St. John’s Hospital in Springfield. The money will go towards an endowment fund for pediatric oncology specialists, and the cancer unit will be renamed The Jane Pitt Pediatric Cancer Center.

    So much philanthropy ????

    Reply
  245. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    One thing to consider though is that Collin Farrell said that during the making of Alexander, they had sex, and that she “would do ANYTHING in the bedroom”…..so if she was seeing Brad then, he was definatly not the only one she was Effing@Kate:

    Reply
  246. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    LiveLeak.com – Bringing An End To This False Prophet Obama! Jon VoightJun 13, 2009 … Voight is the father of actors Angelina Jolie (Angelina Jolie Voight is her birthname) and James Haven and Matt Sigourney aka Wheelz, …
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ec5_1244877751&c=

    Jonathan Vincent Voight has a third child, half brother to Angie and James? Matt Sigourney aka Wheelz?? Anyone know anything about this…i can’t even pull up photo….

    Reply
  247. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @mia:

    Nope again Mia, we’re having big problems with you leaping to conclusions here and in general aren’t we? Check back over what stories have come out since then: that Ange is suicidal, the suggestion she was abused as a child, that she is pregnant, that she was raped, I don’t believe any of them. And all but one are pretty negative, unpleasant stories. On the contrary I do believe the story that Jen may be bi/gay, but I think it was deliberately planted by Ange’s team to take the heat off her. The whole thing is so biased to try to absolve Ange of any guilt over her affair (the “Jen knew about it for 18 months but did nothing to stop it” angle) that it was quite clear what the motivation was for leaking it and who it came from. These things really aren’t that hard to figure out if you just apply your mind.

    As for the bestiality story well I asked Ian about that in one of his chats as a matter of fact because I wanted to see how strong the evidence was for it. I said “how much evidence is there for the bestiality story” and he said “there is a lot, a lot of evidence” so I’m assuming he has heard it from several reliable and independent sources. That is the basis on which I am judging that one. And as for the incest story, well Ange has kindly offered up a lot of evidence on that herself. Publicly lip-locking with your brother on not just one but several occasions while gripping him in a full-on, body to body embrace, and declaring to the world how “in love” with him you are “right now” when accepting an award is really the evidential basis on which I judge that story. But of course, as you say, it is up to everyone to make up their own mind about the stores on the basis of the evidence and reliability of the source as they see fit. So no mia I don’t automatically believe every negative story Ian tells me about Ange and disbelieve anything that may be construed as negative about Jen, I make a judgment on the basis of the evidence I have at my disposal. I hope that answers your question.

    Reply
  248. Keane's Cat said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    I come from a regal family that is known the world over for having nine nipples rather than the customary eight of lower classes of felines. I tuck my treasured nip under my right front leg for safekeeping. This may be an important fact to remember in the future.

    Reply
  249. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    @Keane:

    So Ian telling you that there is strong evidence makes it true? The only evidence that would make me belive such a sick and insane claim are telling unphotoshopped pictures showing Jolie and the dog “in the act” or an equally telling video. And what exactly are you trying to imply with your assumpption that several witnesses confirmed the bestiality claim? Did Jolie open her bedroom door and invite her entire staff to watch her perform? Just how dumb are you?

    Reply
  250. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Kate:

    Yeah I’m not sure about the AJ vs John Voight stuff. Both AJ and James Haven seem to hate him so much and never shut up about it. Even in a recent interview Haven was bashing Voight, talking about the emotional abuse he inflicted on their mother I think and that he needed to get help for his problems. It just makes me think that there must be a reason there for that hatred. Children don’t tend to hate their parents without valid reasons, and certainly not when the parent is a HW star and their hatred is enunciated in a public forum. I’m not sure what their motivation would be in doing that. But I have no idea what the reason might be for their hatred. Who can say? I don’t know enough about Voight to make a judgment on that. AJ and JH say he was neglectful and emotionally abusive towards their mother, he says AJ has serious mental health issues. Well she has admitted to that herself. But what would be the advantage for a young actress to say such harmful things about her HW legend father unless there was a basis for it? I can’t see why she would be making it up. Perhaps Ian’s book will enlighten us with regard to that a bit more.

    Reply
  251. Constant Gardner said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    @Keane’s Cat:
    You mean you hide your candy?

    Reply
  252. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    @mia:

    Oh mia there really is no point engaging with you because you’re just so stupid and offensive there is no way to have a rational debate with you, so I’m giving up here, but in answer to your question: no, I do not believe there were several witnesses to the act, I think there was one witness but many people have found out about it and passed it on. Bestiality is not such a rare thing. There was a doc on Channel 4 in the UK a few years ago where people in the US talked openly on camera about their sexual relationships with animals. It happens. And no, Ian saying there is “strong evidence” for it does not automatically make it true, it just makes it more likely to be true than otherwise. As for what evidence you would require to believe it well, as I keep saying, that is entirely your prerogative, I have no interest in whether you believe it or not or trying to convince you of it. And as for how “dumb” I am, well I would say, not very. You?

    Reply
  253. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Keane’s Cat:
    At first I thought you were funny, now, well I think you are downright strange.

    Reply
  254. Constant Gardner said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    Because talking about kittie titties is all that is left since there is STILL NO NEW CONTENT ON THE WEBSITE.

    Reply
  255. sama said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Why is there no new content on the website, he can say with this story we stand behind the ladies of IUC but he can not say i am busy or there is no news or whatever

    WHY?

    Reply
  256. mooki said on June 15th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    http://www.usmagazine.com/news/katie-holmes-shows-off-her-dancing-legs-2009156

    all skin & bones..

    Reply
  257. lizzieb said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    Do you know what I completely fail to understand? This is a gossip blog. Some things, like the ‘rape’ story on Angie I find gratuitous and offensive and don’t comment. Other topics, like her general mendacity I do like to comment on and I find it amusing. That’s it, it’s not my life’s work, it’s just a bit of fun. In my job I have to mind my P and Qs so being very rude and unpleasant is quite a relief. So what puzzles me? Why attack someone personally? If you don’t like what someone says by all means disagree but to be rude to posters and make personal remarks about them is very poor and spoils what is an otherwise pleasant swamp of rear and loathing.
    Keane, I don’t always agree with you but I do find what you say often interesting and /or funny and I think it is really shitty to attack people personally. Unless they are Hollywood ’stars’ who sell their private lives daily day, in which case- game on.

    Reply
  258. lizzieb said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    I meant ‘fear’ of course, not rear. Fear and loathing does make more sense.

    Reply
  259. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    @Keane:

    I could give that compliment back Keane – arguing with you is like talking to a gummi wall! As I said before you are obviously one of those people who are willing to believe any negtive claim about somebody they cannot stand – that would be Jolie in your case – no matter how much you are trying to deny that! Fine I am sure Ian appriciates such devoted followers as yourself! Too bad that Ian has not been able to provide proof for any of his claims concerning Jolie even when he was asked to do so. But then in your case that would be wasted effort anyway now would it? Let`s see if he puts more efforts into his books because really this site is pure hearsay and unbased claims!

    Reply
  260. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @mia:

    1.) Nope
    2.) So what are you doing here then?

    Reply
  261. BooBoo said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    I am a longtime lurker and I love this site, in large part because of Kate, Keane, Ladybert, Sugar Ray and all the other great people who write in. Keane, I especially like your backstory information on the show business world of Britain. Kate, Ladybert, Patty Anne and everyone else, you guys are always informative, interesting and funny. This is a journalist’s blog–Ian and company are going to call things as they see them without the sugarcoating from the PR world. There are numerous Jolie=Pitt worship sites if that is what you’re into. Don’t pay any attention to the hay-tas. Keep writing, people!!

    Reply
  262. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    @lizzieb:

    Thanks hun, I assume (and hope!) you were talking about people attacking me and others and not the other way around. All I can say is there are two species of abusive posters: one is the very ignorant, stupid, have nothing better to do, bottom feeders of the world type who there is no reasoning with; the other is the paid, professional abuser whose modus operandi is to bully people out of here, because they are that scared about this stuff being given a voice. That is all there is to it. And yes they will always personally attack us. They can’t get anywhere with reasoned argument, so it is really the only option left open to them. It’s always been like that. I now have a very thick skin!

    Reply
  263. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @Keane:

    1) yes you are
    2) I already answered your question. I am here to bring some sense into this insane speculation!

    Reply
  264. sinker said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    and another daughter, i believe. i can never remember her name. will try to find it.

    Reply
  265. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    keane is a twit

    Reply
  266. Keane's Cat said on June 15th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    Mine is a delicate truth. MROW!@Constant Gardner:

    Reply
  267. mia said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    @Keane:

    Yes keane we know that every poster who doesn`t share your opinion is either dumb or a paid plant in your mind. Suuuure. Well maybe one day you will figure out what a discussion (board) is all about. It is people with DIFFERENT view points discussing one particular subject – and not just yes-sayers padding eachother on the back!

    Reply
  268. benjaminbutton14 said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    bb14. I have decided not to post reports on BP and AJ from mags Down Under. I feel that it is a waste of time. All our Aussie reports are from mags overseas which we have read on here before. All tho I have to admit that some of the articles reported here I haven’t heard before. Sorry if I have bored everybody with these so called reports, so I will just join in with the posting as before.

    Reply
  269. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @mia:

    Whatever mia, good luch with your life. No further communication from me.

    Reply
  270. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @MaeIAsk:

    You on the other hand are our most learned contributor ever.

    Reply
  271. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @BooBoo:
    Thank you BooBoo! “Good vibes” are always nice to hear (oops, harking back to my heyday 60’s again!) :P

    Reply
  272. Constant Gardner said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @sama:
    ITA. The shout out was not CONTENT. The flame wars are not CONTENT. How do you run a blog with no fresh CONTENT?

    Reply
  273. moo said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    I’d personally like it if you carried on reporting them. Some I admit I have heard of but not all and it’s interesting to hear another countries take on what is going on
    :~)

    Reply
  274. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Hey BB14 – dont feel bad. Sometimes you tell me things I dont know as I dont read the gossip magazines – thus, I rely on Ian and the good posters here (including you) to bring me up to date! :D

    Reply
  275. moo said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Oh and you haven’t bored me in the slightest.

    Reply
  276. Keane's Cat said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    I’m merely a feline trying to survive in a musty basement. I apologize for offending your delicate sensibilities. @ladybert62:

    Reply
  277. Kate said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    I am wondering if he is waiting for the In Touch story tomorrow to break, just a guess. He mentioned that on the chat.

    Reply
  278. Amelia Spock said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Idle Speculation in La-la Land

    Could it be that Walk Away is Keane’s alter ego? Anguished and enduring sleepless nights over her sadistic treatment of hapless posters, Keane created Walk Away to satisfy her need for punishment. “Beat me! Beat me!” cried Keane to her alter ego. Happily, Walk Away complied, thus making it possible for Keane to heal and obtain peace of mind. We are all praying for Keane. Amen.

    Reply
  279. jan said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    keane please just ignore mia. she will argue until you become irratated and loose your cool. she is like a ball biting ant that will come back time and again, she is not interested in seeing another piont of view she has made up her mind and even if the earth is round she is convinced it is flat and nobody will change her mind. bj4 please keep posting as here in sa we don’t hear these stories as most people don’t care two hoots about these two pr ho’s. and really i wish people will realize they have done nothing to improve africa but talk and talk shit about the african people as if they are all inferior to them and need these a holes to tell them what to do. i say let africa make their own choices and get ourselves out of shit that is the only way to improve and learn. stop with this charity and stop sending these stars they should stick to their acting jobs and leave the worlds problems to people that know what they are talking about. i really wish these two will retire and go live on a island out of sight and stop pushing themselves on the world. i would rather listen to nutty tom cruize than them, enven paris is more entertaining and clasy than them. jmo

    Reply
  280. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @Keane’s Cat:
    Hi Kean’s Cat – I wasnt offended – just didnt understand your comment and found it unusual. No offense to you meant either! :P

    Reply
  281. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @jan:

    Thanks hun, I thought she might be engageable but she is obviously just an offensive, loopy fool like the rest. Never mind, I’ll just leave her to talk to herself! And ITA with your thoughts on Africa, aid is not helping.

    Reply
  282. Woof said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    “keane please just ignore mia. she will argue until you become irratated and loose your cool.”

    How exactly does one lose something they never had to begin with? :p

    Reply
  283. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @Kate:

    Do you know what that might be about? Did Ian give any clues?

    Reply
  284. Constant Gardner said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @Kate:
    We can hope.

    Reply
  285. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @Keane:
    Thanks Keane. I appreciate that.

    Reply
  286. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @Keane: Looks like they are trying to tear you down again. Do not interact with them. I agree with CG where is the content. Bickering is a proven way of getting a board shut down and they are not going to leave you alone until you ignore them.

    Reply
  287. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    @BooBoo:
    What planet are YOU from? You think this is “a real journalist’s blog” ?????????

    Reply
  288. Kate said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @Keane:
    It has something to do with them meeting with lawyers I think is what he said, it was at the very beginning of the chat.

    Reply
  289. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @Sunny:

    Yeah and I’m wondering if the fact that a big story is due to break tomorrow might be bringing more of them out than usual. There’s quite a few considering we haven’t actually had any stories. Not people like Mia and MaeIAsk of course, they are just fools from the bottom of the food chain somewhere. But there have also been quite a lot of the other kind too. Will be interesting to see what’s coming up tomorrow!

    Reply
  290. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @Kate:So are Brad and Angie meeting with lawyers, or is just the lawyers working out custody and things like that.

    Reply
  291. Amelia Spock said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @MaeIAsk:

    Actually, this blog has a lot of metaphysical value for me. In its twists and turns, I find many cosmic answers.

    Reply
  292. Amelia Spock said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Amelia Spock:

    Forgive me. I neglected to use an apostrophe.

    Reply
  293. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @Keane:
    Hey Keane, thanks for the shout out!

    Reply
  294. Constant Gardner said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    Why is Ian waiting for In Touch to break a story before he adds content to this site? The guy from IT who was on IUC chat was a tool. Ian ran up the visitor stats to this site 130% in the last 3 months. This was a viral marketing campaign and I believe it is now completed. Book tour.

    Reply
  295. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Agree

    Reply
  296. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @MaeIAsk:

    Any time! BTW, you sexy!

    Reply
  297. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @Keane:
    I do like your sense of humor Keane! And I’m not being sarcastic . . .this time

    Reply
  298. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    I think Ian may have some blowback from some of the stories he’s printed and is just making sure we hear both sides. Or maybe the people he was quoting are fired and he needs a new source.

    Reply
  299. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Don’t you think if Ian wanted to get hits for his site he may have gone for slightly less controversial subject matter though? I mean stories of bestiality, incest, child abuse and rape have put off more readers than he’s attracted lately I would have thought. Its not the greatest way to conduct a marketing campaign IMO. And there have been Brange stories on this site for a lot longer than the past few months. I’ve been reading them for a lot longer than I’ve been commenting here. It was between last summer and autumn time that I started reading here. I don’t know why the stories have stopped, but I have to say I was always amazed at the speed with which they were coming out before. Maybe he wants to hold the rest back for the book, otherwise we will all already know its content. That would be my guess. And before anyone says it, yes I AM IAN or I KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT IAN or whatever. Might as well get that in before anyone else does!

    Reply
  300. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @MaeIAsk:

    Why so offensive then? You’re a weird one. Sometimes nice, sometimes a tw*t. What gives? (And that star does not stand for the letter “I” by the way!)

    Reply
  301. meg said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    ian you are quiet…
    any angie scoop? :p

    Reply
  302. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    I didn’t like the Billy Bob quote. He is talking about a mother albeit a mother who isn’t acting in her childrens best interest. As far as we know. She might be a wonderful mother. And the sex with a dog is just filler. I believe if she did that she has more problems than we can even understand.

    Reply
  303. Different Guest said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    It may be all quiet on the Brange front, because they are done with each other, just working out the details, Cannes obviously did not quell the rumors. The People cover doesn’t seem to have had any effect either.

    Reply
  304. karenab said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I’m sorry, I fail to see where MIA has been stupid, offensive, loopy OR a fool. I saw someone disagreeing, and trying to put a differing pont of view, but thats SUPPOSED to be allowed, right ?!?!?!?!?!?!

    Reply
  305. Kate said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Not really, his book for Michael Jackson comes out according to the website in July, Britney Spears in Feburary, and hopefully Brange in October. He has books to do PR for ongoing just as he has for the last ten years. This is nothing new for him, he does chats, he promotes his books, he does interviews. When he was promoting the one on James Taylor he promoted his music, when he promoted the one on Kurt Cobain he was on Court TV, when he promoted his book on Hollywood Undercover about Scientology he was on 60 minutes, IAN did not create this blog to promote his book for Guy, think logically. That is ridiculous, it just is not necessary. Now with that I am sure I will be called his cheerleader again, but this is just the facts. Anyone can google it for themselves.

    I do agree it is frustrating not to have new stories to chat about after having them in rapid fire for so long, and I have no idea why he is missing in action these days. It would be nice if IAN would drop in and say hello or one of the others SR or Miss Nine.

    But, whatever…

    Reply
  306. Keane's Cat said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    Good. I am a good cat, I promise. A bit cantankerous at times but charming all the same. PURR!@ladybert62:

    Reply
  307. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @Sunny:

    Anything coming from Billy Bob has got to be an officially accredited Angie approved statement though. They have the same Manager and if BBT said anything she would be unhappy with he would effectively be facing the sack. I think they might have leaked that one out to distract from the fact that she’s currently with a woman and not into men any more. All the Angie approved sources have been very out there in that way: the suicidal story, the rape, and I think also the abuse implications. I mean what man in his right mind goes to a journo who writes tell-alls on celebs and says he raped the most famous woman in the world when she was still a minor? I have no belief in that story whatsoever.

    Reply
  308. Different Guest said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Keane:But wasn’t he a minor as well, it was a classmate, wasn’t it.

    Reply
  309. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Keane’s Cat:
    Ah that’s nice – here you go, a belly rub AND a head rub! Wow! :P

    Reply
  310. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @karenab:

    Karenab I’ve tried to argue with her in a rational way many times but all I get back is jeering and insults, read back over the threads. I’m more than happy to engage in debate with people who talk in a reasonable way, but mia just throws whatever you say back in your face. I have gone through it about a dozen times with her but it always ends in rudeness. I don’t have to put up with that.

    Reply
  311. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    @Different Guest:

    Its still rape though, and he freely held his hands up to it. I think it was a planted story.

    Reply
  312. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Keane:
    Th*nks :)

    Reply
  313. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Keane:That’s true no one would be that foolish. But as far BBT info he is a proven liar. Look what he did on his tour with Willie. I will say this about BBT I think she did have so much more in common with him than she has with Brad. Even when her and Brad are acting lovey dovey they don ‘t pull it off. It seems like the frostiness between them is real. Like they have totally had it with each other. They never looked like a couple who should be together.

    Reply
  314. Inspectorising said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Ian Halperin, best selling author and winner of the Rolling Stone Award for Journalism will be releasing a book on the internet phenomenon “Brangelina” in September 2009.

    We would like to thank you for your contributions, especially Keane and Kate. Don’t get us wrong, you’ve all done a bang up job and will get a mention in the book – but Keane and Kate have driven this site from the start, and it’s due to Keane’s relentless search for the truth that the book is as fabulous as it is. Advance copies can be ordered.

    It is expected to out sell Mr Halperin’s book on Guy Liberte; which has sold 40,000,000 copies in the first week.

    …developing

    Reply
  315. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    I liked Angelina when see wasn’t with Brad. She was a screwed up mess, but she did seem to truly Love Maddox. They seemed like a loving mother and son. But when she started with the knife stories and she set her cap for Brad damn whoever else was hurt she ruined any feelings I had for her. Jen didn’t deserve it and Brad truly did a horrible thing letting her try to hurt Jen. I liked Brad with Jen. But Angie brought out the worst in him. If they split and she is a fair and good mother I may like her again. But i’ll never like her with Brad. And Brad did do some strange things and I think he knew fairly quick she wasn’t who he wanted.

    Reply
  316. Rainydaze said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    Oh my. All of this useless clutter on such a simple topic. Keane, my dear, I admire your effort at trying to inform others of the real situations, but it is of no use to them, if the information is indeed not accurate.

    Reply
  317. Constant Gardner said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @Keane:
    LOL, yes I forgot that you were Ian! and I am also replying to Kate as well-
    Yes, you both make valid points. However, without either new content or some kind of update from Ian, all of what any of us are saying is conjecture, circumstantial. Which is to say that with no evidence (Alexa does show this site with a 130% increase in the last 3 months) all that is left for any of us to do is wonder, speculate and theorize. Which makes this a chat room and not a gossip or celebrity blog. And also a good point about the topics and controversy. But there is no denying that those taboo topics built the web audience! Look, I am not putting Ian down. He seems like a nice enough guy. I have no beef with him personally. But from a business point of view (not to mention my own stupid love of gossip and conspiracies)-from a business point of view, the blog went from Win to Fail very quickly. Which makes it difficult to understand, at least to me.

    Reply
  318. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Sunny:

    I think she was in it for the publicity and to get a father for Mad and he was in it for the “Keane’s cat”! I think he thought he was in love with her because how couldn’t you be when the sex was that good. He wanted kids, she said “how many?”. He thought the new hair colour suited him and he’d wanted to get a tatt since he was 13 but had never had the guts until he met Jolie. Everyone was happy. But when the sex went from good to strange (and not in a good way!) and he realised she might actually have been admitted to a mental hospital for a legitimate reason he wasn’t quite so keen. By that time they already had x amount of children so he was kind of stuck. And the whole leaving his wife for a younger model didn’t help the situation much either I reckon. Both used each other for PR, her more so at first, him more so now. That’s how I reclon it went down. God I bet they can’t stand each other now!

    Reply
  319. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    @Keane:I agree that makes so much sense.

    Reply
  320. Keane said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Yeah if I were him I might have spaced the scoops out a bit more and thrown some padding inbetween. Those stories were coming so thick and fast it was difficult to keep up. But I agree we need some more material. It doesn’t have to be earth shattering, just something to give us a bit more to talk about. Otherwise convos just go round in circles and I end up playing with the trolls all day for fun. (Now that is boredom for you!) Anyway, maybe there will be something tomorrow. Night all, catch you all tomorrow x

    Reply
  321. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Personally, i thought Katie Holms appears to have rather thick legs for such a lean torso and head….looks very out of proportion to me….no offense meant to Katie…just an observation from one who sketches@mooki:

    Reply
  322. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    @Keane:
    Dang Keane – you have a way with words! And your summary of the Brangelina sopa opera is perfect in my opinion! :P

    Reply
  323. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Thank you for your show of support BooBoo…i’m glad you understand that this is not a typical gossip blog@BooBoo:

    Reply
  324. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    OK – there are two possibilities as I see it :
    Ian was hit with a cease & desist letter
    - or -
    Ian has lost interest in this site and just doesn’t care about his loyal readers any more . . .

    Reply
  325. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    @mooki:
    Actually I think she looks pretty good in that photo (except for her hair which I dont like) – but her arms look “Michelle Obama-like and her legs look good! Wish I looked as good as she does! (Hey, my hair looks better even if it is mostly “foxy-white”) :D

    Reply
  326. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    Other options: or he has been ill and is still recovering or he is really busy and will get to us when he can! :P

    Reply
  327. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    wow, no one hears a word about them, although Jon Voight has been seen accompaning his neice, or goddaughter around the sets/etc. I wonder why there seem to be no photos of Matt Sigourney aka Wheels Voight? And…why do Angie and Jamie never mention him? Did he have the daddy time they wanted? Is that it?….wouldn’t it be nice if one could extend a magnet over a topic, and all the information needed to come to a conclusion would attach itself?….sigh@sinker:

    Reply
  328. Rainydaze said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Thank you for that well needed rebellion against Keane/Ian/who ever else this person feels the need to be. I believe that you have just spoken for many people here. It is nice to see that someone has not been brainwashed by all of the misinformed “gossipers” that chose not to publish the facts. All though i can imagine it would be hard to write & publish the facts when they don’t know them .

    Reply
  329. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    @ladybert62:
    He didn’t look ill when plugging his book or playing sax,
    and if he’s just to busy to get back to us, that shows he just doesn’t care.
    I guess that we just didn’t provide him with enough hits to make this site as profitable as he had hoped

    Reply
  330. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    Sorry to butt in, but imo, if Jon Voight were mentally ill there would be some obvious signs through his many years of film making, some sort of gossip would be out there. With Angie however, not only did she out herself about her mental condition, she bragged about certain activities such as cutting to feel relief from pain(??!!??) How that would relieve pain i have NO idea, look at her attraction to BBT, a man 20 years older than she, with whom she shared vials of blood, and had many times discussed publically their perverted sexual activities ( a room filled with adult toys? a la S & M) And yes her, S&M with Jenny Schimizu….many many signs of screaming for help, but sick enough in my opinion to refuse it when offered. Isn’t that why her mother had her committed to a mental institution when she quit speaking? I hate to say this, but this profile screams of a badly abused childhood, and i can’t but help question her mother’s revolving door b/f policy or the way she said she permitted her 14 y/o daughter’s b/f to move in with them….very bad parenting in anyone’s opinion@Kate:

    Reply
  331. Rainydaze said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    Oh my. All of this clutter on such a simple topic. Keane, my dear, it is oh so considerate for you to attempt to inform these people of the real situations, but it doesn’t help anyone the smallest bit, when you don’t indeed obtain the knowledge of the real facts.

    Reply
  332. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    You have never bored us benjamin, please don’t stop posting what you wish, because we all would miss your tidbits if you did. It’s our coming together , sharing ideas, thoughts, information that make this such a great blog… who knows, since this is a published journo’s blog, we may one day have a quote or two in one of IAN’s books :-) @benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  333. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    HI MaelASk: Your first line is a valid point. Your second line is a faulty conclusion and your third line is also faulty reasoning. But aside from that, how have you been? Looking good in that photo! :P

    Reply
  334. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    IAN Haliprin is a well published author, below is a partial listing of his published books to date:
    Love & Death: The Murder of Kurt Cobain by Max Wallace and Ian Halperin (Paperback – Mar 29, 2005)
    Buy new: $14.00 $12.6053 Used & new from $2.10
    Get it by Wednesday, Jun 17 if you order in the next 23 hours and choose one-day shipping.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
    (72)
    Other Editions: Kindle Edition, Paperback, Hardcover, Unknown Binding
    2. Who Killed Kurt Cobain? The Mysterious Death of an Icon by Ian Halperin and Max Wallace (Paperback – Jan 1, 1999)
    Buy new: $12.0023 Used & new from $3.08
    Get it by Wednesday, Jun 17 if you order in the next 20 hours and choose one-day shipping.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
    (81)
    Other Editions: Hardcover
    3. Bad And Beautiful: Inside the Dazzling and Deadly World of Supermodels by Ian Halperin (Paperback – Feb 1, 2003)
    Buy new: $15.95 $14.3537 Used & new from $5.99
    Get it by Wednesday, Jun 17 if you order in the next 19 hours and choose one-day shipping.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
    (36)
    Other Editions: Hardcover

    4. Fire And Rain: The James Taylor Story by Ian Halperin (Paperback – Jan 1, 2003)
    Buy new: $15.95 $10.8534 Used & new from $4.70
    Get it by Tuesday, Jun 16 if you order in the next 9 minutes and choose one-day shipping.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
    (91)
    Other Editions: Hardcover, Hardcover, Paperback
    5. Hollywood Undercover: Revealing the Sordid Secrets of Tinseltown by Ian Halperin (Paperback – April 6, 2009)
    Buy new: $14.95 $10.1725 Used & new from $8.75
    In Stock
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
    (2)
    Other Editions: Hardcover
    6. CELINE DION: Behind The Fairytale – A Very, Very, Unauthorized Biography by Esmond Choueke and Ian Halperin (Paperback – Sep 15, 1997)
    11 Used & new from $3.37
    (41)
    Other Editions: Mass Market Paperback
    7. Who Killed Kurt Cobain? by Ian Halperin and Max Wallace (Paperback – May 31, 2002)
    10 Used & new from $4.65
    (1)
    Other Editions: Hardcover
    8. Love and Death: A New and Explosive Investigation into the Murder of Kurt Cobain by Max Wallace and Ian Halperin (Paperback – April 23, 2007)
    9 Used & new from $9.53
    9. Shut Up and Smile: Supermodels and the Dark Side by Ian Halperin (Paperback – Sep 28, 2000)
    2 Used & new from $29.99
    (41)
    Other Editions: Paperback
    10. Best Ceos: How the Wild, Wild Web Was Won by Ian Halperin (Paperback – Sep 2000)
    Buy new: $11.999 Used & new from $4.24
    Not in stock; order now and we’ll deliver when available
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping.
    (6)
    11. Best Ceos How the Wild, Wild Web Was Won by Ian Halperin (Paperback – Jan 1, 2000)
    1 Used & new from $44.81
    12. Love & Death: The Murder of Kurt Cobain by Max Wallace; Ian Halperin (Paperback – Jan 1, 2005)
    1 Used & new from $52.12

    « Previous|Page:1 2 |Next »

    Reply
  335. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Hi Patty Anne – the little bit I know about “cutting onself” is this: (1) sometimes when children have an early sexual experience and it involves physical pain, then they associate pain with sex and somehow the pain becomes required in order for the sex to be pleasureable or (2) when someone has been extensively abused psychologically, they cut themselves (or burn themselves, or pinch themselves) in order to active their physical sensations to override the psychological numbing they have created to dull the psychological pain. I have been trying to read about it and understand it since it is such a strange phenomenon to me. Does these explanations make sense to you (since you have become my psychology mentor/reference on this site!) :P

    Reply
  336. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, I am aware of these publications, but don’t see how that has anything to do with his silence on this site. Besides, ANYONE can publish a “book”, there are loads of places that will publish ANYTHING if you pay them.

    Reply
  337. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Sorry for the typos, am in a hurry at work! :D

    Reply
  338. MaeIAsk said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Thanks girl! I’ve changed my hair.
    Just wish Ian would leave some feedback or a post to clear some of this up.

    Reply
  339. Amelia Spock said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Keane ‘n’ walkaway: One and the Same or a Case of Opposites Attract?

    Examples for Your Consideration

    Embittered Jen Supporter/Wild-Eyed Angie Acolyte
    Simpering Dog Lover/Sniggering Snake Handler
    Intense Investigative Journalist/Oh-So-Proper Etiquette Columnist
    Graduated From Oxford/Flunked Out of Redneck Tech
    “Oscarina” Madison/”Felixa” Unger

    Reply
  340. ladybert62 said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    You are funny! He will, he always has in the past. Patience is a virtue I was told (repeatedly) by my mother! Ha ha :P

    Reply
  341. Rainydaze said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    I believe you are on to something here. Ian has left us with out a sufficient story to talk about. My theory, Brad & Angie got sick of him “gossiping” about them, that they’ve gotten their butts of their over priced couch, walked out the door of their over priced house, and have gone to a far away land. Leaving poor Ian with just a bottle of antidepressants and an even bigger bottle of Mad Dog.

    Reply
  342. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    Yes actually, it does. Any “feeling” is better than no feeling, and if pain is identified with pleasure, ergo it would require pain to reach orgasm. Sometimes i actually pity the child Angie was, what a horrible life she must have had with her mother Marcia Lynne Bertrand who had a grandfather who had a part French Canadian relative, and no Iroquoise blood but claimed to have had for publicity reasons….do we see a pattern between mother and child?@ladybert62:

    Reply
  343. fresca said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    @Kate:
    BUt she admitted as well Kate. She said something about being mentally unstable and so was glad to have her acting parts to use her different sides or something like that. If I can find it I will post it.

    Plus her mom had her committed at one point so maybe her dad is unstable as well but she def is.

    Reply
  344. fresca said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @Keane:
    Oh yeah thats true but I wouldnt say they always look great. AJs hair looks greasy and she brags about the pee stained clothes they wear on the carpet. She needs to have Brits dad take over for her cuz she is around the bend IMO>

    Reply
  345. Patty Anne said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:27 pm

    I agree with an earlier poster who said they actually liked Angelina Jolie in her pre-Brad days, when she was mother to only Maddox, and a very obviously nurturing, loving mother to her son. Even her bad-azz attitude in film was attractive, but after hooking up with Brad, it soon became clear to any with an open mind, they were toxic for one another. It was downhill from then on. I can not stand her for what she has become, nor can i stand Brad for encouraging it in her, as well as in himself…for profit.

    Reply
  346. Amelia Spock said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    My “guiding spirit” suggests that you establish your own blog. You have a stable core of regulars. And of course Keane and her alter ego/nemesis could be the moderators.

    Reply
  347. Amelia Spock said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    @Amelia Spock:

    By alter ego/nemesis I meant to say walk away. I thought about suggesting Kate, but the Keane/walk away dynamic is so enthralling!

    Reply
  348. flaxen said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    What do you have against toxic relationships? They can be quite educational.

    Reply
  349. flaxen said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    @fresca:

    She would attempt to seduce Daddy Spears in no time.

    Reply
  350. flaxen said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    @Rainydaze:

    I am sorry Ian is feeling so distressed. I’ll send him a floral arrangement.

    Reply
  351. Naptime Heiffer said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    PattyAnne isn’t it nap time yet? Isn’t time for you to cook dinner, entertain the husband and get the little one ready for school or camp? It’s time to clock out of IUC doncha think???????? Even if it’s just for a little R&R. How about shutting the pc down for a while. You’ve got to be operating on safe mode at this point! We’ve heard it all today on how much you loath Ms. Jolie. Why don’t you savor the flavor for another day of hate filled rants for tommorrow? You put in alot in 10.5 hours today, with no break in between . Now if you were on the clock at work you would be getting paid but, your not it’s IUC. So come back tommorrow. I promise the blog will still be here.

    Reply
  352. TobyKat said on June 15th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    @fresca:
    Jon Voight on his daughter’s mental issues
    http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,333476,00.html

    Reply
  353. Ms Agatha said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    AJ has filmed public service announcement to honor World Refugee Day, The ad will be promoted around the world , and her interview with Anderson Cooper coming up Thursday night on same subject.

    video link : http://www.celebitchy.com/55711/angelina_jolie_psa_for_world_refugee_day_jolie_to_be_on_ac_360/#comments

    Reply
  354. Kate said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    @Inspectorising:
    lol well someone has a sense of humor , that was funny even though it is poking fun but hey I can laugh with you even if you are laughing at us, pretty cute ,:)

    Reply
  355. Sunny said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    @Patty Anne:I read all you wrote and you expressed your true feelings and I admire you for that. Like we both have said how we liked Angie before she went after Brad. So thanks for your honesty and candor.

    Reply
  356. Kate C. Bitchy said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    @Amelia Spock:
    Since we are doing alter egos, I would like to be someone else for awhile. I think I will change my name for the next few weeks . I think I will be Kate C. Bitchy lol since everyone calls me that anyhow. Just giving you guys a heads up so no one can say I tried to switch names on them.

    Kate-Cheers

    Reply
  357. Kate C. Bitchie said on June 15th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    @Naptime Heiffer:
    Oh come on now, Patty Anne and I are both getting paid, don’t you know that?

    Reply
  358. unknownxcat said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    Ian is in a stew right now, simmering on AJ’s stovetop. A little cilantro, and he will be so tasty with some fresh bread. YUM

    Reply
  359. Rainydaze said on June 15th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    @unknownxcat:
    Lets all have some. Oh no. Cancel that flower arrangement flaxen. It wont be necessary any longer. At least now he is out of his misery.

    Reply
  360. unknownxcat said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Ironic – the biggest “scoop” is IAN !

    Reply
  361. ianfulosit said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    Delusional much? Is this Ian’s way of making you crazies feel important… lol infiltrators wow, it’s called paranoid schizophrenia… look into it.
    Sincerely Angelina Jolie
    !!!! oh crap I just gave myself away, now they’ll know Ian’s right :( It’s been me all along trolling this board.

    Reply
  362. Question4u said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    From June 9,

    Ian: “I’m going to serve him with papers later this week. I’m going to sue his ass off because he called me a hated man… This man’s going to court with me, I promise you that. I’ll reveal who he is in a press conference later this week early this week.”

    When will this happen?

    Reply
  363. ChancesAre.... said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    @Naptime Heiffer:
    HAHAHAHAHAHA!
    Can we sing a lullaby and g’nite dirge style for Keane too…We’ll be mourning the life she might have had ….you know, the dancer/actress/model…Yes, that one we will mourn…The bitter, tubby, frigid, man-hating, psuedo-intellectual ,internet addicted, cyber bullying shut-in? Not so much….Go towards the light, Keane….it’s on the other side of your front door, not on your computer screen….but if that ‘light’ tells you you can be a model? Run like the dickens, hon….Self delusion can only get you so far…Baby steps…Baby steps….

    Reply
  364. Sowhat? said on June 15th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    So What? Who are these people anyway?

    Reply
  365. Rainydaze said on June 15th, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    My goodness. Have you ever thought about it? Maybe, that is Ian’s big plan. One day he was just sitting there, not writing on his gossip site, when he got a thought. “What if I don’t write anything for a while? Then every one will start talking about ME! And I will be the center of attention. Then one day, when they’re least expecting it (since they’ll be so occupied talking about me) I will take over the world! MWAHAHA!” Alright Ian, we’re on to your plan.

    Reply
  366. Ms Agatha said on June 15th, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    The video is all but AJ promoting herself : Positioned center stage, right in middle of frame, Donald Duck lips bigger than ever, voice like phone sex , using this forum just for own visibility , man, is she removed from all or what ? Who is going to buy this anymore ? So sick of it. The UNHCR needs to get the hint and stop this.
    Sad.

    Reply
  367. unknownxcat said on June 16th, 2009 at 1:54 am

    People will buy anything! Example: this site, for instance.

    Reply
  368. Gitano said on June 16th, 2009 at 7:49 am

    Ian Halperin and his book got mention in Canada’s national paper, The Globe & Mail, today. It was in context of McLean’s magazine being sued for its cover story on Guy LaLiberte and Cirque Soliel which makes reference to Ian’s book on the subject.

    Reply
  369. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 8:03 am

    Yo yo yo people, still no new posts or stories then? Blimey, this site has ground to a halt. I’m even getting bored of toying with the trolls. Anyone heard what that InTouch story was about? I could just google it of course…. back in a sec!

    Reply
  370. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 8:07 am

    Hm, it was just this, nothing earth-shattering:

    http://www.intouchweekly.com/content/cover/img_cover_large.jpg

    Just preparing the ground for the eventual split announcement, dull.

    Reply
  371. Constant Gardner said on June 16th, 2009 at 8:17 am

    @Keane:
    Gawd.

    Reply
  372. ladybert62 said on June 16th, 2009 at 8:28 am

    @Keane:
    Hi Keane – dang, they both lool awful in those pictures – they both look older than me! :D

    Reply
  373. Angie's Pitbull said on June 16th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    @Keane:

    Did you read the actually article? Doesn’t really appear as they are laying the groundwork for a split. I thought Ian said they were already “kaput” ? Intouch changes their tune just like other tabs. Now,the latest is Brad brought Angie lingerie for her b-day yet, Jen’s name was somehow mentioned and it ended in a blow up. You would really have to be pretty hard up for gossip to believe any of that crap. The tabs have been saying there’s been trouble since the hook-up now they are moving on to year 6 together. I don’t doubt they have problems but, it would appear they are far from over. They aren’t immune to breaking up. So, if it happens then it’s won’t be shocking.

    I think site was hit with a cease and desist. Or Ian has run out of shit to say about Brangelina. Not hard to believe. There was never proof to substantiate anything of his allegations.

    Reply
  374. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:05 am

    @ChancesAre….:

    Aw didn’t your momma tell you envy was a sin Chancesare? Sorry you don’t have any achievements/attributes in life and sorry it has made you so deeply jealous and bitter. Oh and just FYI cutey britches, I hate to spoilt your bitchy party but it was a real life modelling agent who told me that, you know one of those real life people out in that real world that no-one acknowledges you in? I know, its hard for you to remember, but there is one out there with real people in it too! I’m sorry they all run screaming when they see you but with a face like that, I don’t think you can really blame them. So yes, I’m sorry the only person who ever told you you could be a model was that weirdo who hangs around on street corners because he wanted to get in your knickers but them’s the breaks kiddo. Try not to let it destroy your life. Everyone has something going for them somewhere, even if it is often, um very, uh, hidden? I’m sure you have pretty feet. Big love and hugs from the unembittered IUC ladies to you my bitter beauty, may it warm your brittle, hate-filled soul x x x

    Reply
  375. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:10 am

    @Kate C. Bitchy:

    Ha ha ha! I have already said I think we should ask Ian to change the site name to http://www.ianundercovern.com, and I am now thinking of changing my username to Keane Cyber Bully Supreme, what do you think?! Plus I think we should all have a daily vote to select our favourite troll of the day. Then we can all gather together and cast an evil, malevolent spell on them to say thanks awfully for being such a beauteous source of all things ignorant, repugnant, stupid and offensive. What do you think?!x

    Reply
  376. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:18 am

    @ChancesAre….:

    .delete………

    Reply
  377. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    @unknownxcat:

    .delete…..

    Reply
  378. fresca said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    @TobyKat:
    Thank you Toby!!:)

    There was another article with a quote from Angelina where she admitted to being unstable. And said thats why acting was good for her bc she had other outlets instead of going insane. I had it bookmarked on my other computer to use when the loons were driving me up the wall so now its gone. Darn it. And googling I cant find it.

    Reply
  379. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    @ianfulosit:

    ,delete………..

    Reply
  380. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:28 am

    Just found that re her new video coming out: Very funny read. They call it a photo stunt.

    http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m6d15-Angelina-Jolies-refugee-video-publicity-stunt

    Reply
  381. TobyKat said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Angelina’s 2009 national World Refugee message
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoGwGGIY2Ko

    Reply
  382. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    I believe she made that statement about her role in Gia. Some said living in that deep, dark place day in and day out during production nearly did drive Angie to a mental breakdown. About her role in Girl Interrupted, Angie said that was a release for her, as she could let all her anger, pain, depressions out. I too lost the url for the quotes..lol Some of these one-opinion Loons are like popcorn, jumping all over the place…it’s sort of fun to read some of them, they are trying so very hard …..ergo….we must be extremely important to them to make such a supreme effort. Do you suppose they run home to mommy with new Show-And-Tell stories?…lol@fresca:

    Reply
  383. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    @ChancesAre….:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber-bullying
    This is for you and the rest of your group of Cyber Bullies…..read it and learn from it while you still have a bit of decency left in you….oh….and pass it around too!

    Reply
  384. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    That was genuinely hilarious which is terrible because it is such a serious subject matter. The problem with most actors is they are unable to speak without sounding like they’re performing a role. They can’t talk in a natural way, they have to take pauses for dramatic effect and emote like they’re angling for an Oscar. Bono is another prime offender. Do any of them ever realise how ridiculous they sound? If this is exemplary of Jolie’s public speaking skills then she wouldn’t even be able to run for office let alone win it. Can you imagine her doing her speeches for her candidature? “I Angelina Jolie, raider of the tombs, girl – interrupted, wife of Mr Smith with a mighty heart, do solemnly declare that I will rid the world of the evil known as inheritance tax and take at least 0.25% off VAT on cigarettes and alcohol. I solemnly vow to devote myself to the cause of street sanitation and humbly swear to leave no stone unturned when it comes to preventing dogs from fouling on our sidewalks. Protecting the cleanliness of our sidewalks and liberating ourselves from the burden of taxation on alchoholic beverages and tobacconist goods will turn our nation in to a haven of righteousness that could be but dreamed of by our ancestors. Today dog poo and cheap cigs, tomorrow the world! And it is only with I, the great Angelina Jolie – defender of the overly taxed and guardian of the street corner – as your leader that this great nation will ever reach its deserved apotheosis. Plus I promise to look hot in all promotional photos, hotter than that other skank/candidate anyway. Come on now, with lips like this who could say no? Oh really, you’re saying no? Oh ok…. quick Bill, what do I do? What’s that you say – get on my knees? Well why didn’t you say so the first time! No problem at all.” Or something like that!

    Reply
  385. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    http://www.bullyonline.org/related/cyber.htm

    Reply
  386. Rainydaze said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @Keane:
    Only if you’ll volunteer. Never mind, You probably wouldn’t have to. You may already win the vote.

    Reply
  387. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:11 am

    @Keane:

    You truly made my day, thank you for bringing a huge smile on my face for rest of the day. Already archived in my bookmarks ! lol
    Makes you wonder that nobody in her PR team is able to stop her from making her look like a fool. Either she is not listening to them or they are not seeing the writing on the wall either, which would make them un-professionals… which I doubt. Clearly, her performance is another shoot in the foot , following the debacle in Cannes…. she sure is on a fast down slide…… her interview with CNN Cooper is coming up Thursday ….. I have no idea how she is going to pull this one off…..

    Reply
  388. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:12 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    Talk about telling it like it is! Seems like Ian and Daryl are the only people in the worldwide media prepared to call Miss Jolie out on these things at the moment, except for that one NY Times piece. It was interesting that the comments section was almost exactly like IUC’s: lots of intelligent commenters and the odd loon saying you’re all jellis haters Angelina forever etc and even someone accusing another commenter of being Daryl in disguise! How funny. I guess this goes on all over the net; anyone who supports the blogger is automatically the blogger in disguise; anyone who writes anything negative about Angelina Jolie is automatically the same person writing under different uernames on every site, because how could more than one person in the world dislike her right? Its highly amusing. BTW AJ did look pretty awful in that vid didn’t she? She seems to be morphing into a fraggle. I hope she gets the help she needs some day soon.

    Reply
  389. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    @Rainydaze:

    Ding ding ding we have a winner in the arena!!!! Woo hoo! Yeah!

    Reply
  390. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    @Keane:

    BTW … If she would know her Method Acting Stuff … she could convincingly LOOK as if she cared about the stuff she is reading from prompter….

    Reply
  391. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:18 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    The pleasure is all mine! I just think her people have bought into her myth as much as she has. They are like the right-hand men to her cult leader. And I guess, when your leader is making you as much cash as theirs is, you’re more than happy to worship at their feet!

    Reply
  392. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    @Keane:

    Looks Daryl D is taking off where Ian left …… any support is a good support ! lol

    Reply
  393. fresca said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Ah Im on a message board that we have nearly driven them all off. They do like Sybil and have multiple sns and unfortunately bc of the MOD cant call them on it. So once a month or so they come in swarms or one person madly opening different tabs to egg herself on. ANd they are so ignorant, saying the same thing over and over again. Gah. I guess if they had any intelligence they wouldnt buy what The Brand is selling but still its annoying.

    DONT FEED THE TROLLS. Maybe, hopefully they will go away. Or at least till school starts again;)

    Reply
  394. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    @Keane:

    No wonder BP is distancing himself fast from this avalanche of bad PR coming down on her, he can’t afford getting into its path…… hence the hospital ‘rescue’ PR …. not a day too early !

    Reply
  395. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    Yeah I think method acting is ok if you’re like Daniel Day Lewis and really throw yourself in to the part and suffer for your art but otherwise I think its just pretentious guff. Acting is just pretending/imagining anyway, you don’t have to keep doing it when the director yells cut! With most actors I tend to think “I’m a method actor” is short-hand for “I have no training” anyway! As for Ange well from bits I’ve seen of Changeling I think she can do “pretending to be a woman from a different period of history/society” well enough. What she can’t seem to do is convince the audience that she genuinely feels anything though. That performace was completely skin deep IMO. It was like she transformed herself into another person, but that person had the feelings and sensibilites of a robot. Much like that little performance on the refugee vid!

    Reply
  396. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:28 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    Yeah right! Now let’s watch them try to out-do each other with charitable donations and humanitarian efforts. The way its going they might end up bankrupting each other!

    Reply
  397. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    @Keane:

    lol Agreed 100% … She thinks Method Acting is an excuse to skip acting class and good old fashion training …. as so many do. That’s why she is a so called Star and not an actress. Love to see her on stage, as Julia maybe ? …. have to keep dreaming …hahaha

    Reply
  398. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    @Ms Agatha:

    Aw bless her, she’s about 20 years too old for that role now. And to be fair I never really pictured Juliet having massive, surgically enhanced lips – call me old-fashioned! BTW I LOVE how Chancesare accused me of being both “man-hating” AND “frigid”!!!! I’m assuming that would be because I’m gay right, as all lesbians automatically both hate men and sex! Homophobia is alive and well in the persona of Chancesare folks! Ha ha! I am also finding the trolls’ suppositions about me to be quite hilarious. So they’ve already decided that I hate men (I actually tend to like them more than women outside the bedroom as a matter of fact) and hate sex, I wonder what they will decide next? That I don’t give good head or floss enough maybe? Good stuff!

    Reply
  399. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    new thread

    Reply
  400. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 11:05 am

    @Keane:

    There is no nobility in mediocrity…. these are contributions of no consequence by these people …
    Praise be to sheep everywhere who graze on the hillside mindless of things to come ….. lol

    Reply
  401. unknownxcat said on June 16th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    what the heck did I do ? I havent bullied anyone. sniff.

    Reply
  402. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 11:35 am

    @Keane:

    Their opinions are counting for nothing…….. but I like your floss remark….. had me in stitches

    Reply
  403. sinker said on June 16th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    @ladybert62:
    cutting can be a coping mechanism for physical/sexual/emotional abuse. cutting feels like a way to CONTROL the pain. since the person can’t get rid of the internal pain, they will attempt control it externally. common in borderline personality disorder, “depersonalization disorder” (where one feels like one is estranged from oneself).

    what i can say from experience is that cutters like this tend to hide their scars and do not talk about it publicly. which leads me to believe that AJ got involved w/ it as a dare, or because she was sleeping w/ someone who did, or she thought it was cool. although i do see where she might have some BPD traits. IMO JMO

    Reply
  404. sinker said on June 16th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    @Constant Gardner:
    yeah, but if there are no stories, there are no stories. i’ll just check back later. a shout is just that – a shout out. he’s under no obligation to anyone.

    Reply
  405. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 11:49 am

    @sinker:

    Hm, yes I knew a girl for a couple of years before I noticed she had scars all up the inside of both her arms. I was really shocked. I think she wore a lot of long sleeves to disguise it. When I first saw it I was so taken aback I immediately asked her about it and she just said “oh it was nothing, it was years ago”. It was clear it was something she was not proud about and didn’t want to discuss. Which is what you would expect from people who were genuine self-harmers I would have thought.

    Reply
  406. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    @Angie’s Pitbull:

    No, what is an “actually article”? Sounds sexy!

    Reply
  407. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yeah I don’t really buy that “I was playing a mental patient so I nearly went barmy stuff”, it’s acting. They have a full camera crew and equipment around them, they can never forget it isn’t real. Plus when you’re doing a film you probably only do an hour or two of acting a day, if that, especially if you’re not the lead part. Acting is just pretending, actors try to dress it up as more than it is. You never start thinking it is real and it is never more than a performance. I’ve played a mentally ill muderess before and to my knowledge I have never murdered anyone….. yet!

    Reply
  408. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    Thanks for the encouragement fresca, and i don’t intend to feed the trolls. I’m not that used to these blogs, so when i saw the Cyber Bullies in action it was surprising to me, especially as a few of them had posted here before moving to another blog on which they claim we are bullys….amazing isn’t it? Like a monkey chasing it’s own tail, and the tail caused it…lol. I don’t intend to answer any of them , as there is no point to it, they seem to prefer talking to themselves anyway…. :-) I posted the URL for Cyber Bullying to perhaps wake up the few who aren’t really bullies at heart, but just playing “follow the leader”…..@fresca:

    Reply
  409. *cough*bitch*cough* said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    @Keane:

    No, but you ARE mentally ill, so…

    Reply
  410. Amelia Spock said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Even a witty kitty can run out of good material.

    Reply
  411. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    I noticed that Ms Agatha, she was portraying a caring, humanitarian spokesperson , note the word portraying…lol. Angie is all about Angie and she has learned all about morphing into what works at that time from Brad, the ultimate Morph@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  412. Amelia Spock said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    @fresca:

    But we’re hungry! Order us a pizza!

    Reply
  413. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    Angie once said her scars are under her clothes, and as she sometimes wears rather revealing clothes, i’m wondering if all the tattoos are a cover up?@Keane:

    Reply
  414. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    You’d love the pictures Keane, i don’t read the print stuff, but the pictures…oh la la! Go to your local library and ask for the latest edition of an Actually Article….@Keane:

    Reply
  415. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    Doug Pitt is that you?@Birthday Girl:

    Reply
  416. Different Guest said on June 16th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    It does seem rather peculiar, that the lack of any real news about the dastardly duo would bring out the trolls en masse, unless they’ve finally realized that no news means they are split up. I do hope Anderson Cooper goes after her about her faux interest in refugees.

    Reply
  417. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    @Different Guest:

    Unfortunately I think they’re more of a mutual apprecation society. Someone linked us to an article by an African writer a while back which slammed them both for their attitide to Africa. He asked her what Africa’s main problem was and she said something like: “well they’re a tribal people you know, but they’re trying, they’re really trying”. The writer was like yes dear, that’s the root of Africa’s problems in a nutshell. And he also said that they bonded over the fact that they’d both witnessed an African child die and were in possession of the only photo of that child. He said it was like they thought the death of those children was more siginificant as an experience to them than it was to the parents. It was a very scathing piece. So yeah, I don’t know much about Anderson Cooper but this writer seemed to think they were cut from the same cloth.

    Reply
  418. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @Keane:

    You may enjoy reading this article by Brendan O’Neill ‘ Brad, Angelina and the rise of celebrity colonialism ‘
    in which he suggests at the end : ‘ Africans might be better off telling Brangelina and the rest to get lost, instead of indulging their wacky whims’

    http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/327/

    Reply
  419. Different Guest said on June 16th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Too bad, maybe Hillary will go after her, aren’t they both supposed to be on?

    Reply
  420. Amelia Spock said on June 16th, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    @Different Guest:

    We’re very comfortable here. This has become our home away from home. (lounges in hammock).

    Reply
  421. ladybert62 said on June 16th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    @sinker:
    Thanks sinker! I will keep that in mind as I read about the evil Ms. Jolie – your take on her particular brand of cutting is very interestting and I appreciate the added info you gave me re the “normal” cutters (gosh that sounds strange – but you know what I mean). :D

    Reply
  422. Keane's Cat said on June 16th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    I’m more of a shredder than a cutter.

    Reply
  423. chris just married said on June 16th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    hello everybody, my husband told me earlier that he saw an article on a french movie website saying that tarantino and pitt were thinking making a remake of millenium ?! the movie just got released ! what’s wrong with hw, they don’t have ideas anymore so they make 2 remakes a month or it’s just to say that european movies are not good enough for american audience ? this movie doesn’t need a remake. especially by tarantino, and even less with pitt. they’ll only ruin it. i really hope it’s just a rumor

    Reply
  424. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    @Ms Agatha:

    That was interesting thanks, and very much along the lines of the article I was referring to as a matter of fact. Another interesting read re: Africa is Paul Theroux’s Dark Star Safari, not sure whether you’ve read/heard of it? Its a travel diary by a novelist so is enjoyable reading if you love Africa but it also has some interesting theories on what the continent’s “problem” is. Theroux taught there in the 60’s and when he goes back to visit 40 years on he feels that things have got worse not better. He deduces from this that 40 years of charitable initiatives are not the answer, he doesn’t feel it has been of long-term benefit at all. He visits hospitals that were built 15 years ago but have fallen into disrepair and destitution because no-one is maintaining them. He meets Westerners teaching in schools who are leaving their posts but no locals are interested in filling their place. He argues that donating aid to Africa can actually be counter-productive as charity then becomes one of that country’s main sources of income so it is in the interests of corrupt governments to keep their nation poor so they can receive the cash and not have to put any effort into building up their economies themselves. He also talks about people who move to areas where there has recently been a natural disaster and aid has been donated to build houses in the hope that there will be another one and they will get one too. Also says a lot of people he meets don’t necessarily want to stay in Africa and make the continent better, they want to go to New York and become a taxi driver and earn dollars etc. Its a very interesting read. Not sure how correct it is but it just goes to show how much more complex the issue is than many celebs may think.

    Reply
  425. lizzieb said on June 16th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    @Keane:
    Yes. I was talking about you being attacked. It pisses me off no end-there is no need for it. I do love how some people seem able to peer through the ether and *see* your morbid obesity and shut-in-ness. I wish I could see though computers but I can’t sadly. i have to judge posters on what they write. And, guess what? If I don’t agree I might put another view or better yet ignore them. I’m just crazy like that. So if your posts are so awful- why read them? More to the point what on earth gets people’s knickers in a twist if you don’t worship the mighty Ange? I am a big fan of Robert Downy Jr but if you said he smells of fish and eats his own young I wouldn’t get over excited about it. Funny ol’ world innit?

    Reply
  426. lizzieb said on June 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    @TobyKat:

    Jesus wept.

    Reply
  427. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    @lizzieb:

    Yeah there is definitely a form of double-think going on here. These “people” believe it is their right to come here and abuse Ian and us at will, because that is their “opinion” and they have a right to express it. If they are attacked back or someone defends Ian in any way then that is us being “cyber bullies” and we can’t accept anyone with an opinion which differs from our’s. Truth is I’m all for opinions, but if you come on to a discussion board you better be prepared to defend them if someone disagrees with you. What I am not for is abusing people. I think there is quite a big difference which is evident to most people with half a brain. Or that’s what I thought until I came here – little did I know! And as for the abuse well it tends to be what people resort to when they haven’t got anything better to say, as we well know from Just Jared. You can’t win though, if you say actually I’m very far from being a heiffer etc then they play on that ad infinitum. You can’t win and I just don’t particularly give an eff any more. They can say what they like, its not going to make the remotest bit of difference to what I say so they can just keep trying if they like! I do hate the abuse of Ian though, if people don’t like him or his site then thsy shouldn’t come here simple as that. Can you imagine people abusing MK like this? They’d get wiped off the board. People don’t seem to understand the concept that you comment on a blog because you like the person who runs it, therefore you will defend them against attack. I guess these people are more graduates of the Perez Hilton school of blogging though rather than the Dlisted school. Its a funny old internet world! Thanks for your support though, and for confirming that I am in fact a Brit and am NOT Ian. How funny, there was never anything remotely like this going on at Dlisted. Makes me feel nostalgic for the days of “Love Angelina”. That was about as fractious as Dlisted ever got!

    Reply
  428. IKNOWITWAS YOU said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    Shut up your not being abused. I also know it was you that came on to the FF starting that tirade. Very funny but, when you started cursing we knew it was you miss Oxford…

    Reply
  429. MaeIAsk said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Keane girlfriend, you don’t own or control this shindig – if you express your opinions, then so can others. You don’t like it, then don’t come back. I did notice you’re very good at long winded posts that manage to boost Ian’s numbers here on Alexa’s average time spent on site . . . . interesting By the way, how do all y’all like my new glasses? Aren’t they the bomb?

    Reply
  430. NAPTIME HEIFFER said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @MaeIAsk:

    She thinks she’s PAUL BART MALLCOP! Ian never even made her a moderator on the board.

    Reply
  431. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    @Keane:
    I did some research on the internet phenonium of The Cyber Bully, and found some definations of what the trolls are doing here is head on. This is a very good read on the subject imo
    http://www.bullyonline.org/related/cyber.htm
    The Internet provides the perfect forum for cyberbullies, individuals whose aim is to gain gratification from the distress caused by provoking and tormenting others. The anonymity, ease of provocation, and almost infinite source of targets means the Internet is full of predators from pedophiles targeting children to serial bullies targeting … anybody.

    and

    Many serial bullies are also serial attention-seekers. More than anything else they want attention. It doesn’t matter what type of attention they get, positive or negative, as long as they can provoke someone into paying them attention. It’s like a 2-year-old child throwing a tantrum to get attention from a parent. The best way to treat bullies is to refuse to respond and to refuse to engage them – which they really hate. In other words, do not reply to their postings, and on forums carry on posting without reference to their postings as if they didn’t exist. In other words, treat nobodies as nobodies

    How true. We must exersize willpower to stop “feeding the trolls’ as fresca said earlier, as there is no normal, or logical way we can make them realize the harm they do to themselves, and others perhaps. I also posted the URLs with a new topic on FF …. Topic Cyber Bullys. I hope there are enough rational, logical, non-combative people there to read it and connect it with what they will find if they read the IU topic afterward. As for me…i choose how i feel, and i choose to ignore all troll postings on this site from this time on. So be prepared to be ignored troll….

    Reply
  432. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @MaeIAsk:

    Where did I say I did? You’ve got a big problem with reading comprehension girlfriend. I’m not sure if you’ve ever commented much on blogs before but on the ones I’m familiar with, the commenters generally like and respect the blogger, and yes, defend him against abuse or attacks. If you’re more familiar with the likes of Perez then I’m not surprised you think abuse is A-OK. FYI abuse does not constitute an opinion, period. And if you think it does then I pity you. And yes sweetheart, I’m definitely just here to boost Ian’s ratings on whatever “Alexa” is. He pays me to be here don’t you know? And Kate and Patty Anne and Ladybert62 and etc etc. But I also in fact AM Ian, as is Kate and Patty Anne and Ladybert62 etc etc. Satsisfied now? God, you just can’t get the quality of the trolls these days.

    Reply
  433. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @Keane:

    Thanks for your reply. I know some of Paul Theroux travel books, one I remember particular is about the South Pacific, which made me actually go there to see for myself. The one about Africa I don’t know, but will research online……… asap

    Reply
  434. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @MaeIAsk:

    …. well, don’t they look depressing ? Keep thinking….. it only does you good …

    Reply
  435. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    I just checked out InTouchWeekly and nada. I thought something big reguarding Brangelina was due out today :-( . With Brad in LA, Angie wrapping up SALT in D.C., and Jennifer due to film The Bounty Hunter in NYC soon….some sort of “news” would be in the paps….this silence is more telling than all the headlines in the world. Seems to me it’s a rather amicable break up after all, and everyone is laying low to try to slip it under the rug…. humm?

    Reply
  436. Cor said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Ummmm hey!
    Been a lurker for some time…I have to say (and no doubt I’ll be called a loon) that I am finding it hard to believe the content – however makes an interesting read.
    Does anyone seriously believe half the stuff on here?

    Reply
  437. Cor-blimey said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    I love the glasses

    Reply
  438. curiouscatz said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    Keane said on May 23rd, 2009 at 3:22 pm
    @SZ:
    Ok this is going to sound completely irritating too everyone so unless you are SZ please skip over it. Ok, just to say it in brief, I was doing professional theatre at the age of 8, I was shortlisted for the Royal Ballet school at 11, I was top of my class in all classes at school all my life, I am trained in all forms of dance at the highest level and got the highest grades for all exams, I am a LAMDA trained actor and won at a lot of the drama festivals I competed in, I went to Oxford, came 26th out of the 260 people in my year in my first year exams so got a scholarship, worked in television making programmes in the most respected strands on the most respected channels in the UK and I’ve been scouted by a modelling agency in London. Do you honestly think that I consider making comments on an internet blog a big achievement and that I am here to flatter my ego?

    Did you train with Alexa-Maria?
    Alexa’s musical passion started at a young age when she attended stage school from the age of 8. She went on to star in numerous plays, most notably at Oxford University where she starred as Musetta in La Boheme at the Oxford Playhouse and April in Company by Sondheim. She also had a leading role in the off-West End premiere of Falsettos and was a chorister at Keble College, Oxford. As for dancing, Alexa trained at the Royal Ballet School in Birmingham until the age of 11 and has since danced Ballroom and Latin competitively for Oxford University.

    Reply
  439. Cor-blimey said on June 16th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    why are my posts deleted?

    Reply
  440. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Maybe the silence before the storm ?

    Reply
  441. ladybert62 said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @MaeIAsk:
    They look like the same ones to me! But still very pretty glasses. :P

    Reply
  442. Patty Anne said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    Very possible. With so much going on right now one would think there would be lots of sightings, photo ops, etc. And, it seemd unusual for Jennifer to bring it up when accepting her award for Women in Film …. although i loved her comments! Laughed out loud at what she said, and how she said it

    Reply
  443. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @IKNOWITWAS YOU:

    Your – BELONGING TO YOU.
    You’re – YOU ARE.

    Just learn that one thing for the love of God, that is all I ask!

    Reply
  444. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @IKNOWITWAS YOU:

    Actually I never ran for Miss Oxford, beauty pageants are so passe don’t you know?

    Reply
  445. fresca said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    LOL I didnt mean to yell at you. That was in general if you ignore them sooner or later they will get tired of talking to themselves. I think at least.

    I do think its quite funny that they come on here to insult people and dont seem to realize that they look like the insane ones. So just laugh and ignore.

    Reply
  446. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @IKNOWITWAS YOU:
    But you do know I would have won, having been scouted by a London modelling agency, don’t you?! Good Lord!!

    Reply
  447. Ms Agatha said on June 16th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    If I were JA I would not stop laughing either….. If you think of it…. who would have thought it would all come down to this only 4 years ago ? I think the legal ramifications are huge, staying low is the best they can do right now, we will find out sooner or later

    Reply
  448. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @Keane:

    Thanks for your support Keane2. Its always good to know I have my very own troll on my side to cheer lead for me. Smooches x

    Reply
  449. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @Keane:

    Ha ha ha.. “smooches”… hardly!! I don’t know what you’re talking about, smooches?? You wish… you might have a chance if you weren’t such a ghastly charlatan, and I can’t even fathom how you have the gall to say anything to me when you brazenly miss apostrophe’s like that, we went to Oxford University, how dare you show us up like this!!!?? Oh, and by the way, dear, something, rant, something!

    Reply
  450. Keane said on June 16th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Keane:

    Ah my very own stalker is getting angry, bless. Don’t take it out on the night staff. Love ya x

    P.S. Be a good girl for the staff and I’ll send you another pic to add to your shrine to me. You know how much it soothes you. There there.

    Reply
  451. Naptime Heiffer said on June 16th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @curiouscatz:

    Very interesting catz. Someone has been copying and pasting their life story. Busted Keane!

    Reply
  452. flaxen said on June 16th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    @Keane:
    I was first runner up in the Miss Cambridge pageant. I still have the trophy.

    Reply
  453. too curious said on June 16th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    Hi all@ My cable/internet has been out since lunchtime Saturday – boo, hiss. I’ve been getting online when & where I can but haven’t been able to catch up on posts :)

    I’m working on a theory on the “BP was not having sex with Jen & AJ was banging him like crazy” and “Jen knew for 18 months” but I need some help from Kate and the rest of you! I really believe that Jen had a miscarriage and that is when things went south in their marriage but I’m not sure exactly when that was supposed to have been – sometime in 2004??? BP & Jen could have had some kind of arrangement re: on-set flings, so he fools around with AJ. Then Jen gets pregnant and miscarries. After the miscarriage she loses interest in sex (possibly due to the miscarriage itself or to the reason for the miscarriage – if it was because of toxic mold exposure due to the renovations on their house, as was suggested in one article someone posted, in the emotional aftermath she could have blamed BP because of his relentless remodeling). Anyway, BP tells Jen he’ll wait for her but then turns more and more to AJ and when Jen finds out that in the aftermath of losing their baby another woman’s child (Maddox) is calling him Daddy the shit hits the fan – that is far more of a betrayal. Of course, I personally can’t imagine allowing casual flings in a marriage or getting pregnant while the husband is sleeping with someone else, but HW lifestyles are much different than what I am used to!!

    Someone posted earlier (not sure who, sorry) that BP probably deemed himself to be trading up from JA to AJ since Jen and her Dad were mostly TV actors and AJ & JV both had Oscars. I think you are right – his 3 serious relationships have all been with connected women: Gwyneth’s parents were both in the business and her Godfather is Steven Spielberg; JA has a parent in the business and her Godfather was Telly Savalas, and then on the the Evil Queen and her Daddy Dearest. I don’t think BP fell “in love” with AJ until he decided he was finished with Jen. Does anyone know at what point in his relationships he does the hair makeover to match the girlfriends?? He did this with GP, JA and remember the black hair once he and AJ were public?? [I totally loved hearing that AJ and Mickey B supposedly laughed themselves silly over BP dyeing his hair black to match hers!!}

    Reply
  454. too curious said on June 16th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    OK, losing signal strength so off I go again. Hope to be back later to see if any of you can help with the theory in my post!!

    Reply
  455. Amelia Spock said on June 16th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @too curious:

    My spirit guide tells me that you have been out of work for a long time. I hope you find reasonable employment soon, as you appear to have too much time on your hands. Peace.

    Reply
  456. curiouscatz said on June 16th, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    @Keane:

    You’re past your prime? Or were you referring to a movement in which one leg passes behind or in front of the other as in ballet?

    Reply
  457. another me said on June 16th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    if anything, all of you looooovely posters keep me very entertained while working on neverending, tedious projects at work, and while sitting in crawling traffic with nothing better to do than surf the blogs.
    i love reading the bickering more than anything else. some here are without a doubt THE most passive-aggressive people i have EVER witnessed!
    keep it going!!!

    Reply
  458. aviatrix said on June 17th, 2009 at 12:42 am

    @Amelia Spock:

    :)

    peace…..

    Reply
  459. Cirque de Jolie said on June 17th, 2009 at 7:01 am

    *gets shortlisted for the RSB*

    *aged 2*

    Reply
  460. EGO-MANIAC said on June 17th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    @another me:
    It is rather entertaining isn’t it.
    The theme seems to be “lets all try to out do each other”…but does anyone really, I mean really care where anyone was schooled? Or who has been scouted?

    Reply
  461. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    Walk Away said to Keane:

    “You are fascinatingly warped, a human Jack Russell with a half chewed thesaurus. Take a deep breath. Grow up. Move on.”

    and I am ROTFLMAO!
    hee hee hee

    Reply
  462. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    Keane said: “And as I’ve said about a hundred times now, I have no interest in what others think of me,…”

    The why don’t you just ignore those you challenge you? Because you LOVE the attention.

    Reply
  463. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Keane:

    “It also became a bit boring and repetitive after a while”

    And you are an EXPERT in boring and repetitive. Maybe that was your major at Oxford?

    Reply
  464. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    Oh poor UFB, another 2 posts about me, you just can’t give it up can you? You are OBSESSED. If I LOVE the attention so much why the hell do you keep giving it to me hey? Are you flirting with me? And there was I thinking people at Dlisted were generally intelligent. You’re really letting the side down aren’t you? Oh and yeah, thanks for telling me what I think again, I forgot to check with The Omisicient UFB first before thinking anything. I will always remember to do that in future. *Remember Keane, always ask that dumb embittered cow UFB from the back end of the interwebs to explain to you exactly what you think and feel at all times, she knows you better than anyone after all*. Will do.

    Reply
  465. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    Pot meet kettle. Where did you major in it? Bitter Cow Tech?

    Reply
  466. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    BTW am glad I gave you your first orgasm. How was it for you?x

    Reply
  467. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    Rolling Stone did some digging today and determined that many of Halperin’s other assertions don’t hold up. The first line of Halperin’s biography reads “Ian Halperin is also a former winner of the Rolling Stone magazine Award for Investigative Journalism.” This came as news to us, so we looked in our own archives and discovered this claim has been greatly exaggerated: He did win an RS honor, but it was the College Journalism Award in 1985 and it was split among the staff at Concordia University’s student newspaper in Montreal.

    Reply
  468. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    Wow what a scoop, no-one has ever said that before in the history of the world ever!!!! You are just the most novel, innovative, scoop-gathering investigative journo-detective in the history of gossip bloggery! Where have you been all our lives???? We were only waiting for you to come and say something that people have been quoting for oh about the last 6 months. Thank God you’re here. This blog was dying on its feet without your input. BTW, just wanted to ask, if I’m so boring, why can’t you just not let me go hey? Come on now, you LOVE me, fess up. Come on, its me you’re thinking about when you’re banging your husband isn’t it, yep I knew it! Dream on UFB, dream on chickadee.

    Reply
  469. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    Jeez Keane, ya might wanna do something about that anger management problem of yours.

    Reply
  470. Keane Cyber Queen Supreme said on June 17th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    Ha ha hahahahhahahhaa!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hahahahhahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Now you are making me ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh bitch that was hilarious, thanks so much for that, I will go to bed with a big smile on my face! And I hope you will too now you know what it is to feel LURVE…. ha ha ha x x x

    Reply
  471. benjaminbutton14 said on June 17th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    bb14. Can anybody tell me???? how do the Paps know when Brad is with Jen, like in In Touch Mag. saying that Brad at Jens house. Do es Brad or Jen leak this news, how come no photos of the two of them if the paps know that they are going to be together. Beats me

    Reply
  472. money and education does not buy class! said on June 18th, 2009 at 5:24 am

    Now I know that I am just putting myself in the firing line but hey ho here I go!
    Keane,
    I seriously think you need to get over yourself…these people are targeting you because you always bite back…if it seriously bothers you just ignore them and no doubt they will get bored and move on to annoy some other poor soul…I read the blog and I see it as just a bit of fun to pass time at work. Now I know you have the language skills to shoot people down as soon as they make a comment about you or anything you do not agree with, but it’s just a blog. There is a real world out there away from the Angie lovers and haters.
    *Yes my English is not “advanced” I am aware
    *Yes I should ming my own and leave you to it
    *Yes you’ll prob ignore this or maybe I will get called a Bitch
    *No…I wont give a toss! Im just giving my 2 pence worth!

    Reply
  473. sinker said on June 18th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    @Keane:
    if you goo.gle “Angelina Jolie Discovers Africa” the source article.

    http://www.africaresource.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=144:angelina-jolie-discovers-africa&catid=36:essays-a-discussions&Itemid=346

    Here is the intro to the article: The new missionaries of the 21st century unveil their “tribal” Africa. Professor Zeleza takes a closer look at the project of saving Africa from itself. It is not what Ms. Jolie said or even the manner she said it that I found troubling, but its very banal familiarity, its brazen simplicity, its matter-of-factness. Asked by a fawning Anderson Cooper, who made his fame for his emotional coverage of Hurricane Katrina, to explain why Africa had so many refugees –the interview was to mark world refugee day – why so many conflicts, problems, the great actress opined: `They are a tribal people, you know`, and added for good measure that they had just recently emerged from òur` colonial rule, but they were trying, really trying, there were pockets of good news in Africa.

    ugh.

    Reply
  474. Moody Blue said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    Oh my goodness, I’m coming back to this blog after… what? three, four, five months maybe, and guess what? The same flame war, with the same regular posters, about the same celebs, with the same arguments rehashed over and over. Thank God the so-called trolls are injecting a pint of fresh blood. But where are our old friends Suzy Q, Colleen and “Angelina Jolie” hiding? I miss them (especially the hilarious French rants). Helloooooooooo!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.