IUC Exclusive: Cirque du Soleil Book Gets Cover Story in Canada’s Biggest Magazine; Who Will Reach Space First, Laliberte or Halperin?

Posted on June 5th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Macleans, as long as anyone can remember is Canada’s largest and most respected magazine, called my new book “a stunning expose of the biggest show on earth and its billionaire founder”.  It’s all part of the current issues’ cover story.  Read Macleans’ online interview with me here

Yesterday, Cirque owner Guy Laliberte announced he intends to become the first Canadian space tourist.  Little does he know I intend to beat him to the punch because as one of my readers points out – I know way more about stars than Laliberte.  Who do you think will reach space first?  let us know.

  1. ladybert62 said on June 5th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    Great picture Ian! You look smashing in that spacesuit with that cute little head attached! :P

    Reply
  2. kabespeenda said on June 5th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    Good afternoon! Sex Services information there. Kiev woman men. Your Kyivska prostitute Rybka. You can visit my blog.

    Reply
  3. Francois said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    Hey! I would put my money on you Ian!
    U r all ready there man!
    Keep the good work!

    The book you wrote on guy laliberté is just amazing!!!!
    You got it all man!

    Let’s have a breakfast on the moon one day!
    Looking at the new show of cirque du soleil with crazy space suit
    Flying up in the air!

    All the best!

    Reply
  4. Kate said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    lol I agree Lady that picture is so funny, what a guy!

    Reply
  5. too curious said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    WooHoo! Congrats Ian!

    Reply
  6. Guy laliberté said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    Some people may think that this entire thing of space is just an excuse to move the attention away from your book! Ah crap! Looking at all the media around ur book, It seems like my idea didn’t work! Oups!!!!!

    GL

    Reply
  7. J2j1 said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    @Kate:
    Great!

    Reply
  8. Kikumon said on June 5th, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    Very impressive…….Good going…….

    Reply
  9. I'm on the bidet said on June 5th, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    Oh I get it – Ian will make it to the moon first, because he knows more about STARS.

    And congrats on the interview!

    Reply
  10. I'm on the bidet said on June 5th, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    From the interview: “You give a lot of space and detail to your own platonic—if occasionally naked—relationship with Laliberté’s angry ex-common-law wife.”

    Ummm, “occasionally naked”?

    I’ve heard of going all the way for a story before, but really now . . .

    Reply
  11. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:10 am

    IAN is there any truth in the rumor you want to go into space to escape the monster that is keane??!!!
    No doubt bitch knows some aliens who went to her college.
    She’s so well connected y’know ;-)
    Parents tell your kids to work hard at school then they too can attend Oxford and become an upstanding impeccably mannered member of society like our foul mouthed, unemployed/unemployable loser keane ROFLMFAO

    Reply
  12. Rick said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:08 am

    Dear god, Ian has officially fallen off his perch. Who fucking cares about an expose on bloody Cirque du Soleil? Yes Ian, we are all clutching our pearls from whatever “scandal” your “sources” are reporting about a trumped up acrobat troupe and its founder.

    I’m done here. It was a sick but intriguing car-wreck spectacle with all of the Brangie crap via “sources”, until the total absurdity factor hit code red. Even Ian seemed to lose interest in making new crap up…I mean “investigating”…right around Cannes of all particularly fertile chances… Now IUC is just yet another “plug- blog.” Boring. Call me back when…if…ever…ANY of his “scoops” comes true. I’m not holding my breath. What a disappointment.

    Reply
  13. Canuck said on June 6th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    Congrats on getting the cover story Ian, quite the coup!

    Reply
  14. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 10:28 am

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Didn’t your mama ever tell you that jealousy is a sin my friend? What’s that, your mama rejected you at birth for being so repulsive-looking that she said this was a child that even a mother couldn’t love? Ah yes, I see where the bile comes from now. I’m so sorry for you and feel your pain, but really you must stick at it with that factory job and one day you too will make a name for yourself somewhere, perhaps as chief peanut sorter? I can see that suiting you. And then perhaps you will build up the self-esteem to get over your parental rejection. You have my best wishes and my prayers are with you for a happier future and better life my friend. Ciao.

    Reply
  15. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 10:30 am

    @Rick:

    We will be sure to do that, you matter to us all so much. See ya loser, wouldn’t want to be ya!

    Reply
  16. mia said on June 6th, 2009 at 10:40 am

    Ah such a pitty your name isn`t mentioned on the cover Ian! Looks like the magazine didn`t want the immediate association with your name otherwise the title would have been “Sey, Drugs & Acrobates a stunning…….. BY the bestselling and awardwinning author Ian Halperin”. Bwahaha.

    Reply
  17. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 11:44 am

    @Keane Aha, we have a clue! Parental rejection. Is that what caused you to turn out the way you are? Is unattractiveness the reason for your insecurity? If you weren’t such a bitch i’d feel sorry for you. Were you bullied at school? Is that why you bully people on the internet? Being tough on the faceless internet’s easy isn’t it? Bit tougher face to face, maybe that’s why you choose to spend your days with your internet buddies coz in real life it’s just too hard to find people to like you. Aaw poor poor bullied rejected Keane my heart bleeds for you.

    Reply
  18. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    No my beauty, that is YOU I’m afraid, I have a great family and had the best possible start in life which is why I know that someone like yours must have been so unbelievably crap! And no, unattractiveness is not a problem for me either, I was very lucky when it came to the gene pool I have to admit, I always think I drew a very lucky straw in life and am very grateful for who I am and how I was born. And thanks so much but I have more than enough great friends in the real world – weren’t you just pointing out how well-connected I am just 2 minutes ago dear? – which is why I’m always so shocked to realise what a large number of utterly desperate, sad and lonely losers such as yourself there are in the world. My friends are all high-achieving, secure, great individuals so I’m very unused to dealing with people with so little going for them in life such as yourself. And you have the nerve to accuse me of being a bully when you only logged on to attack me on a thread in which I hadn’t even commented? Poor, deluded, empty-lived fool, I hope that made you feel good about yourself for once in your life, can’t see you ever having achieved anything anywhere else. Shame, poor little sod. Oh and your heart bleeds for me does it? Now that is the best news I’ve heard all week my friend! Let’s hope you’re all alone and the ambulance doesn’t quite make it in time hey? *Crossing fingers, toes, legs, eyes, everything* Ta ra loser!

    Reply
  19. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    @Keane Don’t you recognise sarcasm when you see it? They’re not your friends freak they just happen to have been at college the same time as you. Not really the same thing is it?
    In my mind bullying a bully is not bullying at all. It’s retribution. You’ve bullied the wrong people in the past and it’s about time you got a taste of your own bitter medicine.
    Don’t count on being completely anonymous hiding behind your username. In these days of myspace/facebook/twitter you can find out all sorts of things about peoples lives. I’m assuming your profile pic on facebook isn’t you because she certainly wasn’t lucky in the looks department although it does look extremely like you. Rather horsey truth be told. Of course that explains your dislike of Jolie. I hate to use the word jealous but it is rather appropriate. Oooh, the green eye monster’s a terrible thing isn’t it?
    Check your facebook wall later i’ll be leaving you a message. You never know when a ‘friend’ is an enemy in disguise Claire.

    Reply
  20. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Oh Poopxxx, you got that wrong, very wrong…Angelina Jolie LOVES horses, oh yes, in every sense of the word….google Horse/Jolie and take a peek….Yano, i fail to understand any man who would want to put his penis into something that has been used as a human garbage dump….just think of all the little buggies creeping around in there….whhhhhhh heee heee….@POOMPLEXXX:

    Reply
  21. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    That’s really interesting, the police also found it very interesting too. So I will humbly await your epistle then? I very much look forward to receiving it.

    Reply
  22. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    Did they really? Can’t imagine why seeing as no crime has been committed. Information posted on the internet is free for all to see-I’m surprised the police didn’t inform you of that. The only time the police would be interested is if an actual crime was committed such as identity theft, fraud etc
    You really are quite ignorant for someone who thinks they know so much.

    Reply
  23. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Oh my dear you really do have a lot to learn. The identity theft has already been committed, you know that and I know that. I even have my very own crime reference number given to me by the police to confirm it. Still we had a little trouble tracing you last time but seeing as you’re coming back for more I anticipate that this may give us the information that we needed the first time. I look forward to your next communication. Try finding out about the law with a little more accuracy before you start trying to push people around on the internet, it will make your position a little more tenable. And BTW dear, I have VERY good lawyers, that old boy’s network strikes again I’m afraid. So, when should I expect to receive your communciation?

    Reply
  24. benjaminbutton14 said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    bb14. For Gods sake take a flying leap will you, we don’t need your bad arse comments on this blog. Why are you here anyway??? you are such a loser.

    Reply
  25. topbrit said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    @ POOMPLEXXX – your sure as hell going to a lot of trouble just to insult someone you fucking weirdo,jesus you must be in possession of some fucked up issues,are you obssessive,physcotic or just plain STUPID! you are really giving off ‘i’m totally fucking insane’ vibe,really.go away fucktard!
    @ everyone else – so sorry for my language guys

    Reply
  26. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @Keane Ha! That wasn’t actually me last time but kudos to whoever it was. I only heard about it from a mutual friend. The urban legend is doing the rounds that you think Angelina Jolie posted on a blog under your name and hacked into your email. Hilarious!
    There’s no need to lecture me on law by the way, in my profession i know all there is to know and the ‘old boys network’ you refer to? I don’t think they’ll be rallying to your defence when they find out who i am. You know who i am by the way-you think I’m your friend. I’ve listened to your two faced bitching and inane paranoid rantings more times than i can count.
    The clue’s in my username. Use your questionable research skills and it won’t be too hard to discover who i am. Idiot.

    Reply
  27. Togi said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:
    Actually, Poomplexxx, you are threatening Keane. Naughty, naughty. It’s quite clear to even the passing eye. Making threats of harassment is a no-no. I would suggest another tactic.

    Reply
  28. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Oh I think it was my friend, otherwise how would you apparently know who I am? There’s only one way I’m afraid, I have never given my identity away here. The only person who knows it is the person who hacked into my e-mail and posted under my name, which if you had the remotest connection with the field of law you would know is a crime I’m so sorry to say. And now you think you’re one of my friends on a social networking site do you, how interesting, you’ll have to tell me who. Great way to trace you after all. And no dearie, your pathetic little protestations about who you are do not intimidate me or any of my high-powered lawyer friends. The only thing to be frightened of is the law my friend, and I’m afraid you have broken it. So keep it up and we’ll have a nice little criminal case to file against you. Just the sort of thing my friends will be more than willing to help me out with. You see, that’s what real friends do my dear, not leak silly little stories about their “long-time friend” on the net. Poor little Poopex.

    Reply
  29. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    And sorry love, but the only people I count as genuine friends are people I know in real life. Maybe a handful of people that I know through chatting on the net but that is it. And I’m pretty certain you’re not one of them. Now come on don’t be shy, I want to be impressed by who you really are and how terrified I should be by that. Its got to be someone pretty high up I reckon for me and all my friends to be scared, I’m thinking maybe God? Not sure I’m gonna be too frightened of anyone else I’m afraid. So come on now, hit me with it? Are you the almighty one, or maybe beelzebub? Its got to be one of those two I’m certain of it.

    Reply
  30. Togi said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Keane:
    Geeze, Keane … you do manage to attract the riff-raff! LOL

    Reply
  31. mia said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Here is a really sordid and sadly very actual story (and I know you like sordid stories since you miss Sugar Ray and Ian)

    Carradine’s “Deviant Sexual Behavior”
    Ex-wife accused actor of “potentially deadly” acts in court filing

    JUNE 5–As investigators try to determine how actor David Carradine wound up hanging naked and dead in a Bangkok hotel closet with a rope tied around his genitals, a review of divorce court filings shows that his most recent ex-wife once accused the actor of “deviant sexual behavior which was potentially deadly.” Additionally, Marina Anderson alleged in a sworn declaration that Carradine engaged in an “incestuous relationship with a very close family member.” Anderson’s declaration, an excerpt of which you’ll find below, was filed in mid-2003 in Los Angeles Superior Court (the document was supposed to be filed under seal but was mistakenly placed in the public court file, where TSG found it). The declaration does not detail Carradine’s alleged “deviant sexual behavior.” As for the incest charge, Anderson reported that Carradine and the unnamed relative admitted the taboo relationship, but that her “pleas for him to get counseling in regards to this matter were ignored and he wanted no part in the healing process the other person needed in order to get closure.” In a phone interview today, Anderson, who was married to Carradine for four years, said she stands by the allegations in her court filing, but declined to further discuss her charges. A Bangkok police official told reporters that investigators were examining whether Carradine accidentally suffocated while engaging in an autoerotic sex act. (4 pages)

    Reply
  32. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @Togi:

    Tell me about it! Still I was really excited to find out who on my friends list was actually a troll/ a member of Ange’s PR team in disguise and what devastating epistle they were going to post to my wall!! Ha ha, it was all so exciting for a minute there, but now poor old pooplexx seems to have gone a bit shy on me and is pretending to be someone me and all my high-flying lawyer friends should be quaking in our boots about!!! Problem is, none of us are really afraid of anybody I’m afraid. Unless they want to start spinning me that line about ground-penetrating radar and blacked out helicopters or whatever it was The Illuminati thought was so incredibly terrifying! Ha ha. The annoying thing is, if only they would post on my wall I might be able to get the info of the person who hacked me and did the identity crime so I can pass it on to the po po. I fear Poopy has gone a trifle shy on me now though. It’s a shame, it really was livening up a slow news day!

    Reply
  33. Togi said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @Keane:
    It would be funny, in a way, if it weren’t so CREEPY! Sparring with words is one thing, but making threats is another. I’m glad you have friends to look after you, Keane. I thought the loonies who were tracking BPs plane were really creepy, too. Paps are creepy, when they’re hiding in bushes. The fact someone takes this stuff so PERSONAL is creepy. CREEPY is my word of the day. CREEPY. CREEPY. CREEPY. EWWWWW

    Reply
  34. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Oh poopy, don’t go quiet on me now, I’m on tenterhooks waiting to find out your secret identity! Now let’s see I think you’re my friend and you’re on my friends list on a social networking site and you’ve listened to my paranoid rants for a long time now and you are also someone me and all my high-powered lawyer friends should be quaking in my boots about when they find out your identity right? Well that really narrows it down a bit doesn’t it now. So if you’re not God or beelzebub, are you…..um Jiminy Cricket? One of the Krankies? (Especially the little one, she was really scary, I take your point there). Or maybe Jim’ll Fix it? Him and that chair that opened up to produce medals always put the willies up me I have to admit…. so come on, don’t be shy, did I guess it? If not can you give me a warmer, warmer or a colder, colder after each one, it would be most helpful. Thanks awfully x x x

    Reply
  35. topbrit said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    @ keane – i hope you got from my last post my complete support,you handle it so well,don’t think i could take such personal abuse,pathetic though it is.kudos to you mate and i hope the freak has disappeared for good!

    Reply
  36. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @Togi:

    Yeah the only person who would know my real identity was the person who hacked my e-mail, there would be no other way of connecting my username with my real name which is why our Poopy has gone a wee bit shy now methinks. They made a big old mistake the first time with not checking out their internet law and doing something which is in fact illegal, which was very, very silly on their part. Now they’re trying to push it a bit further which is extemely foolish but if they want to reveal their identity to me so the police can prosecute I’m all for it. I knew they were trying to get through to me by other means in any case, I got a message from someone on a social networking site who said she wanted me to add as her a friend because she actually had the very same name as me and was going by a pen-name on the site (also against the rules), and I was like, yeah you’re going to have to come up with something a bit more convincing than that dumbasses! Like the people posting here they’re always really stupid like that. I think they’re just peeved because I keep unmasking their plants so they’re trying to go after me another way. If they want to do that they are more than welcome to, I will take great pleasure in hanging them out to dry for it!

    Reply
  37. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @topbrit:

    Thanks sweetheart, I do as always appreciate it. These people are totally dumb though and think they can scare people out of posting here. They’ve tried it so many times it is laughable to me. Picture me quaking in my boots at the secret identity of the person all my lawyer friends should be so scared of who also happens to be someone I think is a friend on a gossip blog! How very hilarious! I am disappointed though, these things start off in such a promising way and swiftly peter out when the idiot realises I’m not as stupid as them. And believe me, I’m not skeered of the twats, we have great police, law enforcement, MPs and legal systems here who are there to help with all this sort of thing. And I make sure I make good use of them! Ha ha.

    Reply
  38. Togi said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Keane:
    Well, try to stay out of trouble, dearie … IF you can. LOL I’ll check back later … probably after everyone has gone to bed. Booo hooo. xxxxx

    Reply
  39. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    @Togi:

    Don’t worry I will, but when you come back would you mind giving me a hand trying to guess Poopy’s identity? I’m sure I’m missing some crucial ones. So far I can only think of the little one out of the Krankies, Jim’ll Fix It or Jiminy Cricket, they’re the only people who strike the fear of God into me anyway, although I’m not sure I think of any of them as my friend or could see them reading much here….! Anyhoo, if you come up with anyone over the next few hours do be sure to come back and let me know, I am so exicted to uncover poopy’s hidden identity! He he, see you later x

    Reply
  40. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    Is that so? Your research skills really are as questionable as i suggested then.

    I don’t know you from the internet btw i know you from real life unfortunately.

    Reply
  41. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Great, do tell me who you are, I am intrigued to know. It’s just that you said you’d listened to my paranoid, jealous rants for a very long time and that I’m jealous of Jolie and that I think you’re my friend. Unfortunately I don’t talk about that woman in real life because it really isn’t that interesting, so I would be intrigued to hear where you heard it all? Come on now you were playing the big hardman before and now you’ve gone so very quiet and shy, how very surprising! So not only do I know you in real life and you’ve heard my paranoid rants about Angelina Jolie – even though I never talk about her outside the net – but all my friends and I would be really scared of you too, wow you can’t be too many people then can you?! Or how about, NO-ONE! You freaking fool, if you’re going to try to intimidate me you’re going to have to do just a little bit better than that now aren’t you? So come on then, let’s see who you are!

    Reply
  42. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Plus Poopy, if you know me from real life, shouldn’t you know how attractive I am and whether or not I was bullied at school and whether my parents rejected me and so on? Seems like you would to me, only you didn’t know any of these things did you? How very curious and extremely difficult for you to find an explanation for! And apparently you’re on my friends list on a social networking site which really narrows it down now doesn’t it? Come on Poopy, I’m waiting to find out your secret identity which me and my friends should be so skeered of, come on don’t disappoint me now!

    Reply
  43. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Oh and you think I’ve bullied so many people in my life too don’t you, unfortunately for you I have never bullied anyone, ever. I despise bullies and would never dream of treating anyone else as such. Oh and who is this mutual friend who has told you all about the internet hacking hey? Cause again, there are only maybe three people I have told about that, all of whom are very good, very long-term friends who are also all the sole of discretion. It will be interesting to see which one of them you pick. You obviously know so come on, don’t me shy, hit me with it! And how curious that you also said it was an “urban legend” when in fact you claim to have heard it from one of my closest friends – bit contradictory there hey? Come on now you have gone so so shy, I am really DYING to find out your secret identity once and for all, ha ha!

    Reply
  44. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    When did i say your inane rants were about Angelina Jolie? That’s not what i said at all. Neither did i say you or OUR friends would be scared of me. I was implying that they know who has the most legal nous.
    Lastly I’m not going to reveal my name on this blog.

    Reply
  45. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @ Poopy:

    This bit is particularly fascinating:

    “I’ve listened to your two faced bitching and inane paranoid rantings more times than i can count.” – cos I don’t do bitching or ranting in real life whatsoever, and I haven’t even had time to see many friends much lately. Have you heard of the expression “clutching at straws” before at all? Just so you don’t have to bother exerting that little brain of yours, I’ll help you out: you are doing it. Dumb fuck.

    Reply
  46. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    Oh good! Another puzzle! Let me see POOMPLEXXX, well the Triple X is simple….XXX rated, so he’s into pornography….that means he must know Angie, and the POOMP….pompous? Now that fits! A Pompous Azz who is also a Porn Star!….Angie is that you?@POOMPLEXXX:

    Reply
  47. topbrit said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @ POOMPLEXXX – oh give it up dickhead you are getting boring!

    Reply
  48. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Oh you can just give me a clue then, by giving your initials, because then I will know exactly who you are. Its very intriguing because I have only told 3 people about what has gone on on this site, two of whom we don’t have any mutual friends anyway and the third of whom was the person I asked for legal advice on what has been going on on this site for. And two of whom I have not seen in person for very many years anyway and the other is one of my best friends. And BTW I don’t do bitching, jealous rants or bullying I’m afraid, so you obviously don’t know me from Adam. Come on now, you can tell me who you are I’m sure. You work in the legal profession, you’re on my friends list, but you heard an “urban legend” that AJ hacked into my e-mail through a mutual friend and I have bullied someone you know in the past. Unfortunately for you I have never bullied a single person in my life, come on now, fess up my friend!

    Reply
  49. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    Any word on IAN’s return? Looking forward to some more clues. I just hope he gets back and give us a few good leads before The End is made obvious to all, including the demented, zombie followers of The Evil Queen of Baby Buyers…..they remind me of all the baby turtles running to the sea after being hatched…..some get it, some never get it…but nevertheless, they run with the pack.

    Reply
  50. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    very true topbrit….i envision a spoiled little brat laying on the floor pounding his/her fists, and screaming at the top of their voice, “You Can’t Make Meeeeee!!!” add to that, “You’re Not The Boss Of Me!”……Pity, all that energy could have gone to some good use….@topbrit:

    Reply
  51. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Come on, fess up, I know a finite amount of people in the legal profession so I will be able to figure out EXACTLY who you are. Unfortunately for you, as with all my friends and acquaintances, they are also all nice people, so none of them are going to be an arsehole like you! And if you know me so very well, why the fascination with my photo on a social networking site hey? I’m sure you know very well what I look like. And if you’re on my friends list – which I keep to a manageable number, not every fucker I’ve stumbled across in the history of my life – you must know me very well indeed. Come on now, fess up coward! I am loving your moves right now, you’re f*cking priceless today!

    Reply
  52. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    Say Keane and Topbrit….today’s issue of In Touch weekly magazine has a full spread about, “Brad and Angelina ; Separate Lives!”….”As their relationshiop deteriorates, Brat Pitt and Angelina JOlie hire attorneys and start discussing custody of the kids”….it’ coming out in more and more magazines…no way to bury it now.

    Reply
  53. topbrit said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @ POOMPLEXXX – as well as sounding a bit batshit you sound a little jealous of our keane,has she outsmarted you in some way,is she more popular than you,does your bird like her more than you(no offence keany babe) cos you sound so fucking bitter you sad arsehole,if you got anger probs go get help dear!

    Reply
  54. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/7350/66944241.jpg
    For A Good Laugh!!!

    Reply
  55. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1191283/Separate-bedrooms-Brad-Angelina-sleeping-separate-houses.html

    Very Good and Telling Read!! The Truth Is Coming Out!

    The Daily Mail.UK

    Reply
  56. topbrit said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    @ patty anne – totally agree it really is,did you see the mag headline ‘it’s not me that wants to split it’s brad’ not sure which mag now,either uk ‘look’ or ‘grazia’.she is really trying to cover her arse all ways don’t you think,dumb ass pitt looks like he will just put the announcement out and keep quiet about all the deviant behaviour(which frankly pisses me right off) just to get away from her and keep some contact with the kids.

    Reply
  57. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    So, the last post i put up, Daily Mail, reports that after SALT wraps up, Angie is planning to go to LA to spend some “quality time” with Pitt…..but……Pitt wants some alone time……oh boy is this gonna be good!

    Reply
  58. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    I think the best thing for them both to do right now is to just come forward and tell everyone that yes, they’ve been growing apart lately with his schedule, her schedule and the kids, and they’ve decided to spend some alone time to gather their thoughts and see where they want to be in their lives. Easy out, classy way to end it, and let it fall where it may…..I don’t understand why all the games about the end?….Madonna did the same until she just up and filed publically, but if Pitt/Jolie got an annulment already, what stopping them?@topbrit:

    Reply
  59. POOMPLEXXX said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Keane Your ability to take things out of context and twist and turn every word is intruiging! Either you don’t read properly or your brain works in a very peculiar way. I do ‘know very well’ what you look like as you will see if you read my post correctly. Does mentioning your photo in response to a comment regarding being blessed in the looks department make me fascinated with it? I think you’ll find it doesn’t.

    Reply
  60. Kate said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    He is back Patty Anne, but he has been fighting the flu, I am sure when he is feeling better he will post.

    Keane, the fool is playing you, just ignore them, the urban legend they are talking about is people talking about you on other blogs, that is all. Ignore her, she is trying to cause trouble. Look how much they have achieved at messing up this blog, go back and look at when it was fresh and fun and none of this nonsense, it is not going to stop until one party stops, and we know they will not, so we have to if we want the blog to return to what it was. Just ignore them, let them piss in the wind dear. We love you, screw them. They are trying to *rat f**k” you..you know what that means?

    Reply
  61. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    Oh and BTW poopy, being the great legal mind you are and all and obviously based in the UK as that’s where all my lawyer friends live, I really hope you elected to use a dummy e-mail address. I’ve already e-mailed Ian to ask him to tell me exactly who you are I thought you might like to know, so it won’t be long before the mystery is solved will it. I hope for your sake that you used a fake one so I won’t have to go running straight to the police with your identity as soon as Ian passes it on to me. Or, if you really are a so-called “friend” of mine, you won’t have any need to conceal it so I will be finding out tout de suite won’t I now? I still find this phrase very curious though dearie:

    “Don’t count on being completely anonymous hiding behind your username. In these days of myspace/facebook/twitter you can find out all sorts of things about peoples lives. I’m assuming your profile pic on facebook isn’t you because she certainly wasn’t lucky in the looks department”

    If you know me in real life, we have all these mutual friends who know you as the superior lawyer (which I’m afraid is BS because they’re all at exactly the same level and none so arrogant as to say they are the superior one), I just can’t figure out why you would need to track me down through twitter, FB, Myspace and the like, and why you weren’t exactly sure whether that was me in the photo or not? Surely you would already know this info for sure. And apparently you’re on my friends list and I’m waiting for a post from you today, well at least then I’ll know exactly who you are then won’t I? BTW I’m sure Ms Jolie will be so grateful for your work on her behalf, so many of my friends are fans of hers after all! Ha ha, fcking ha!

    Reply
  62. topbrit said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @ patty anne – thanks for article,daily mail not usually a paper to pick up celeb news so must be getting out there,watch this space eh? pitt be strong and reform,don’t go back to the nutter.anyways nite nite hun,nite nite all.hope keane doesn’t have to be subjected to pompusxxx bullshit for much longer!

    Reply
  63. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @POOMPLEXXX:

    No but why the room for doubt, you know exactly what I look like because you know me in real life my good friend right? Only you still needed twitter, FB and Myspace to track me down – ha ha! And if you know me so well you will know exactly how my mind works already and won’t be intrigued by it all! Come on now, we’re friends according to you, you know me inside out and back to front and yet you just can’t give me your name, your initials, how you know me or which one of my friends you heard I was posting on this site from. And BTW all three of them are far too busy to be talking about this to anyone. Come on, you are so unbelievably crap at this, its another big fail for you my friend! Go back to the drawing board and try to dream up another way of attacking me! And I’m still waiting for this wall post from a “friend who is an enemy in disguise”! I can hardly wait, seriously I’m creaming my pants with excitement!

    Reply
  64. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    @topbrit:

    I know, that must be it, I msut have shagged their girlfriend and they could never quite let it go! Ha ha, how funny. Sorry I made you feel emascalated there, on with the Poopey show though please, you are nothing but entertaining!

    Reply
  65. Kate said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    ha ha that is pretty funny, who photoshopped that, I like that diaper one some did at FF too lol

    Reply
  66. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    That’s Angelina PR for sure, she always uses OK and their affiliate paper The Mail, it was definitely aimed at getting sympathy for her with the poor Angie bumped her head and Brad didn’t care line. Plus it mentioned her goddam goodwill ambassador show job again. And as if she stayed in that tiny little house while everyone else was in the big house, like it would have been big enough for her ego! And note the mention of the “18 strong entourage”. Well that would probably be 2 PAs, a chef, 2 drivers, 2 security, a housekeeper and 10 nannies I would have thought!

    Reply
  67. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    I thought that inserting the dog was a touch of genius@Kate:

    Reply
  68. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @Kate:

    Oh yeah of course but this is not a troll, this is the internet hacker for sure. I’ve had some attempts from obviously suspect people to contact me on the kind of sites they mention so I know what they’re up to. I just thought it was funny how they were playing the big internet bad ass and then got all shy and recalcitrant when I pointed out more than a few problems with there dumbass diatribe. I was just interested to see how they would try to talk themselves out of it that’s all. They are trying to intimidate me, that’s all, but they don’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell. I have e-mailed Ian to ask him to trace this person though, they have to be connected with the hacking. Unfortunately, as always, they are too dumb to realise when they are incriminating themselves. Anyway, on with the show!

    Reply
  69. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    Ut oh, the flu this year is a bad one….chicken soup!!! …lots of fluids and bed rest….ALONE IAN!…wink!@Kate:

    Reply
  70. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    Did you read the part in the Daily Mail where Jolie says she is heading to LA as soon as SALT wraps? to reunite with Bradders? But Bradders says he needs some more “alone” time…..lol

    Reply
  71. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @Kate:

    BTW, what does “rat fuck” mean when it’s home?! Also how did you know Ian has the flu? Oh and weren’t you going to tell me about the suspected secret identity of Liz E.? Shall we retire to the forum to discuss?!

    Reply
  72. Kate said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    @Keane:
    lol did you see that teeny little hut off to the side that they said she stays in, what a joke. Then we have the “will go to France and rent a chateau” lol they own it still..it does have her fingerprints on it but the reporter did a very sloppy job. I have heard, yesterday be the latest, that they never rented that house, but are at Rupert Murdochs home. Harikari said she did not think he would rent to them but I remember reading that they were there also about 6 weeks ago.They put this info out so the paps stay off them. Who knows, but if he has a compound in LA and she has a house there to (small) so I suppose she could go and hang there.

    Poor thin stressed Angie insisted on doing her own stunts and Brad partied while she recovered. Yes, she is setting the stage for the announcement. jmo

    Reply
  73. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @Kate:

    No big surprise that she has Murdoch in her back pocket hey? That positive press coverage does not make itself! Ha ha.

    Reply
  74. sama said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2009/06/06/brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-to-finally-wed-115875-21420451/

    Angelina Jolie is finally considering sealing her relationship with Brad Pitt – by giving in to his pleas to get married.

    Pals say the star’s change of heart was prompted by rumours their four-year relationship was over amid furious rows.

    They could wed by the end of the summeronce their current filming commitments are out of the way.

    Advertisement – article continues below »

    A close friend of the pair said: “Usually it’s Brad who wants to talk marriage. But this time it was Angie. An aide sent them all the Press clippings about their ‘relationship problems’ and Angelina said it was probably best if they married to put an end to the stories. Brad’s face lit up – he was thrilled.”

    Reports claimed Brad, 45, had rekindled his friendship with ex-wife Jennifer Aniston, 40, to Angelina’s fury – but the pal denied this.

    Brad and Angelina have earmarked New Orleans for the wedding. Their six children would be involved “in a big way”, the friend added.

    Reply
  75. Kate said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @Keane:
    That Mirror article is pretty bold declaring they are getting married. The reporter that did the interview at the afterparty told a paper in LA (I think) forgotten which one how in love he acted, he he gushed over Zahara and that hinted they would be adopting, so since this is coming from her makes you wonder, doesn’t it. Sure is a broad range of insider sources telling different stories out there.

    Yes, that has become a problem but I am not quite sure how to do this, I don’t want to put it on the board publicly. RF , lol you never heard that, became famous in Richard Nixons time during Watergate.. hehe. How, becasue it is problem. I know this will sound confusing, but if you think between the lines you will know what I mean.

    Reply
  76. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    @Kate:

    I confess I am totally confused about what you are saying there, I can understand you not wanting to put the Liz E. stuff on here though. The rest of it, I really have no clue what you’re saying at all! Can you say it again? It may just be a grammatical issue! Especially this bit:

    “How, becasue it is problem. I know this will sound confusing, but if you think between the lines you will know what I mean.”

    I can usually deduce what you are saying but with this one, I am completely lost!

    Reply
  77. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    In Touch Weekly Magazine as of today:
    “Brand and Angelina can barely stand to be in the same room with each other,” says another friend. “It seems like they have both checked out of the relationship and are only pretending to be a couple.”
    but not for long. Their friend says they’ll spend most of the summer apart, and announ ce their split when their children get used to the idea. “Brand and Angelina may have fallen out of love a while back, ” says the pal, “But they both sahre an amazing love for their kids.”

    Reply
  78. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    @sama:

    Those marriage stories come up time and time again to try to quash split rumours. The reality is they already were married years ago and sounds like they got it annulled. None of these PR stories have much of a foundation in reality, they are just what each person’s PR wants you to believe at any given time. That is her’s, for sure. I think she knows a split announcement is timetabled for the not-too-distant future and her PR people are doing everything in their power to fight against it I reckon. The more the stories come, the more I think an announcement, at least from his side is imminent. She is pulling every trick in the book right now to try to forestall him I reckon. The pregnancy, bumping her poor little noggin, anything she can think of to try to delay it and make him look bad when it happens. It will be interesting to see how it pans out huh?

    Reply
  79. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Pukesville-tastic!!!! And that misprint of Brad with Brand was apposite too! Got to keep up the facade of the perfect happy family nucleus, even when they’re splitting up! Its very fun to watch no?

    Reply
  80. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    Most definately, especially now that it appears to be escallating. SALT is wrapped, Brad is supposedly heading back to LA soon, and so is Jolie if In Touch is right. Fireworks for sure. Brad wants OUT…asap i think. Even if he has to ditch the kiddies for some time, anything to be free of the Loonie Queen of Darkness. I think Brad is barely hanging on to his sanity through all this, and absolutely needs time alone to gather his resources and just plain survive four years with Jolie in her mental institution called her life. @Keane:

    Reply
  81. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yup I think you hit the nail on the head there, and I think that’s why Madame Jolie is issuing these press releases like there is no tomorrow! Ha ha, my bet is on an announcement by Autumn 09, I don’t think Brad wants to spin it out for much longer. Let’s take our bets for the timing of the announcment folks!

    Reply
  82. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    Angie’s PR machine is setting out all the little hints that Brad is a selfish man whore; he didn’t pick up her award when he got his, he didn’t rush to her side when she had that horrendous accident and marred her forehead, he didn’t come to spend her entire birthday with her, he rushed off to England alone, again, and now he’s not planning to come back to Long Island, but to return to LA to get ready to shoot his newest movie, followed by one on a distant continent….lol. Jolie will be running herself ragged trying to keep up, and those poor children being dragged all over the planet behind Mom’s skirts….sadest of all

    Reply
  83. Patty Anne said on June 6th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    Mirror UK article is just more B.S. :”Angelina Jolie is finally considering sealing her relationship with Brad Pitt – by giving in to his pleas to get married”…..CONSIDERING. Yep, nothing about remarrying since they annuled the one they did have earlier, but CONSIDERING. She’s putting a huge guilt trip on Braddy here. He’s not showing her love, respect, is never there for her, why she was even considering marrying him when he just up and left for deepest, darkest Africa and told her not to follow!! What a mean ass Braddy is for treating this pure, wonderful, compassionate, humanitarian woman so badly!!…Lmao….gotta hand it to Angie, if one didn’t know better, they might actually believe some of this

    Reply
  84. Livia said on June 7th, 2009 at 5:11 am

    Keane–why so much charged emotion about bloody everything? I used to be very much interested about your take vs. Kate. Now you come off as a bully–with no need to do so whatsoever.

    I know I am not the only one to feel this way.

    Your constant drill seargent tone “reminding” us of your education and ties to the BBC, and so on, and so on, and snore on, makes me think you have less of such than more.

    And if indeed you have those ties, your own views are enough to stand on their own–without pulling out your may–or may not–”industry connections”

    Hi Ian! xoxo
    Livia/dvz

    Reply
  85. Astro said on June 7th, 2009 at 6:22 am

    @sama:
    I am not surprised with this info and maybe Brangie will do it. Both of two are fed up with the crazy media around them every minute. So marriage decision is the result of that. Thanks tabloids and gossip bloggers you are the winners.

    Reply
  86. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    @Livia:

    Oh get a life Livia, I have no interest or concern for your opinion on me or anything else whatseover! I have, after all, never known of your existence before in my whole life. Why would you think some random person on the internet’s opinion means a damn thing to me for God’s sake! I am only here for my own entertainment and to talk to my friends, I do not want nor have ever sought an audience or following. I couldn’t care a less what you or anyone else think about me or anything I’ve said here. Seriously you people are the absolute limit, it’s hilarious! Get a life and stop concerning yourself with what I do, say or think. I am not even aware of your existence hon. Why don’t you stick to forming your own opinions about the stories here and entering into the debate rather than thinking you have a right to make a judgment about me. I really wouldn’t waste your breath as it means nothing to me whatsoever. And it is you and your damn friends who can’t stop talking about my education and contacts, it’s not me who keeps bringing it up, it’s everyone else who is so clearly threatened by them. And yes I have every right to get worked up when someone claims to know my real identity, to know who what I look like and is about to post info about me on another site. That’s called harrassment and I’m not standing for it. Why don’t you try to get a life of your own, grow up and think about something other than me for a change. I am not here for your entertainment and am not answerable to you or anyone else. Just get over yourself, I really am bored to death of it all by now.

    Reply
  87. DebFrmHell said on June 7th, 2009 at 9:08 am

    @Keane,
    I emailed Ian H yesterday and he sent me back two replies thinking that I was you. Without going into detail on a blog, perhaps this error has occured in the past? If a poster you were heated with sent him an email complaining they would probably be gleeful in gathering intelligence against you and that is how your email got hacked. It may not be that some nefarious person(s) or Angelina Jolie got your info. I don’t know. But it could be the result of an error on Ian H’s side.

    I had my real name posted at JJ on a thread last year and it was very distressing at the time. It took about 30 minutes for the moderators to remove the post. I couldn’t for the life of me figure out how they got that information. I did some googling of myself as DebFrmHell and lo and behold, there was, at that time, 87 pages of stuff, mostly from DListed and my comments. It took me about a half of a day and some 50 odd pages to figure out in there that there was a blip in Yahoo! that gave out my real name, email, etc.

    Methinks that maybe that is how Poomplexx has gathered info on you. I did not get your email address from this error nor do I want it. I just wanted to put your mind at ease. There are alternatives to how someone would get your info and I wanted you to see that.

    Also that my be what Pomplexxx meant by your friend is not your friend statement.

    I think that Ian would be wise to assign a moderator for his board since it has become more popular. Someone who is impartial to the threads and will work on the behalf of all members of the flock. If posts that are inflammatory were removed there would be no day long infighting and the site would not be losing it’s members. Self policing is not working for this site.

    Hope that all is well with you and Kate. Good tidings to all the members out there!

    Reply
  88. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 9:25 am

    @DebFrmHell:

    Thanks for your message hun I appreciate it. I think there may have been a way this person could have tried to find out my identity that wasn’t connected to the previous hacking but I am not 100% sure of it. When the hacking occurred Ian also had his account hacked at the same time so I’m pretty sure it was someone doing it on behalf of Jolie. The site also gets hacked into a lot of times by someone presumably working on her behalf so I’m pretty sure they were also responsible for the hacking. They made a mistake though in posting under my real name which is identity theft so I would be surprised if they tried that tack again. It would be pretty incriminating on their part. So yeah I think you’re right that this idiot may not have been connected to that, but he/she was clearly trying to wind me up pretending we know each other in real life and he is such an amazing lawyer that all my lawyer friends would be terrified of them! Ha ha, its such a joke. If these people only had some grasp on reality it would make what they say slightly more convincing! Oh yes we know each other in the real world and I am an amazing lawyer who has to listen to all your rants and bitching (I do not rant or bitch in real life, ever!) and you think I’m your friend when I’m not! Puh-lease, what a tit! Its cool though, I think this guy was dumb enough to probably use his real e-mail address so Ian can hopefully trace him and perhaps he can have a little taste of his own medecine! But yeah ITA with you, this site needs a moderator fast, especially for all new posters. It must be the only gossip blog on the net that doesn’t have one. Abusive/threatening/harrassing posts should be deleted straight away. Maybe we should all hold back from posting for a while until something is sorted out with it. Glad to have you back anyway, hope all is well with you x

    Reply
  89. DebFrmHell said on June 7th, 2009 at 9:40 am

    Just as a note, the email I got back from Ian had a totally different address than the one I originally sent my quiery to. It looked like a personal rather than business email account. People with a grudge and a more rounded “education” about the net than I do could easliy get into these accounts. If the mistake was made around the same time as what happened with me last night with the two emails, the hacking would happen around the same time also. I just don’t buy that the Jolie camp is the one doing it although it does make for a better story. I believe that the error has occurred in kind of a “friendly” fire kind of way. I am not the conspiratist that you are though…LOL! Nor do I attract as much attention. I am your Mr. Spock, remember??? 8-)

    Reply
  90. DebFrmHell said on June 7th, 2009 at 9:44 am

    Also, damn it all for no edit button. I sent back the replys to the two emails to Ian before coming back here so that he would be aware of the info he sent out to me. Just trying to put everyone’s mind to rest.

    Reply
  91. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    I must say that i too am very tired of all the assults regulars here have had to indure, with such extreme vulgar and threatening comments. I don’t surround my self with such low life speaking people in my daily life activities, so i feel i should not have to endure it on a blog either. I have been told to EFF U, been called demented, threatened with death, and it goes on and on. I have only been on this blog less than one month, and i won’t stay if IAN dosen’t set up some protection for all alike, i.e. monitoring. Keane, i have NO idea how you manage to put up with the full fledge attacks you undergo on a daily basis. It is very difficult for me to understand such envy/hate/jealousy or whatever it is that has these self professed intelligent people attacking a total stranger so vehemently unless they live for your responses in order to feel some emotion in their dull, empty lives by fighting. Either way, i know i could not come here day to day and put up with one tenth of what you have. What i have received at their hands is more than i’ve endured on any other blog ever, or actually an accumulation of every bloy/gossip site i’ve ever been to. IAN has to be responsible for his blog, he created it, he owes it to his regulars to protect them, and offer them a safe environment to discuss his topics. Okay, i’m finished with what i have to say about this situation as i see it. I am so happy to have met most of you, and think highly of your opinions. This , to me, has been one of the best gatherings of intelligent, thought provoking minded peoples on the net….

    Reply
  92. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:03 am

    @DebFrmHell:

    I see what you’re saying but at that time there were very few genuine posters or trolls posting at all. Just Kate, Canuck, p and myself and Angelina’s ridiculous phonies. Nowadays IUC is so talked about that a lot of them are just idiots from other boards though so I think this one probably is just one of them. The other issue with the e-mail hacking was they guessed my password as well which was a pretty difficult word to have come up with. I think there might be some sort of computer program which takes all the words of the dictionary and goes through all of them to find the right one. It was however a proper name rather than a word in the dictionary so I have no idea how they came up with it. My password is obviously far more complicated nowadays as a result. The first time I’m pretty sure was the person who hacked me or has repeatedly hacked into this site. This time its just some loser who thinks they’re a badass winding people up on the net. We just need someone to monitor it all now though so it doesn’t happen again.

    Reply
  93. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    Kean…..go to FF, then click on IU Hostility….go to page 11 and read what someone who posts here has said about IAN and you just minutes ago

    Reply
  94. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    @Patty Anne:

    Oh sweetheart sorry I don’t have time, can you summarise?

    Reply
  95. sama said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    You can also just ignore them…. They don’t have fun then….. When you see a post like that don’t react to it …. They do it to Keane because they always get a reaction…… stop reacting

    Reply
  96. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    @sama:

    Yeah I know, I’m over it, its just that one up there was a little too close to the bone for my liking. I will not accept harrassment in any form whatsoever.

    Reply
  97. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    Keane, i feel i have gone as far as i comfortably can with informing you there is information out there you should be aware of. I supplied you the location, and date, it’s up to you to do the research on this one my friend. Sometimes it pays to surf different blogs, even if one doesn’t post on them.

    Reply
  98. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    Oh Hell with it…here goes: Let the poster beware

    DebFrmHell
    Wet behind the ears

    Posts: 109
    Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 1:41 am Report this postReply with quote Re: IUC Hostility
    by DebFrmHell on Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:05 pm

    [quote="SZ"]Reading through some of the more recent posts here have been impressive.[b][i] Many have validated several of my thoughts/suspicions: Alert: Grab a cup of tea and put your feet up, this is a long one.

    a) Ian is SR

    b) He is backing away from Brangie stories in a big way. (Aside from promoting his new book, the hype about having major Cannes-related BLOCKBUSTERS never came to fruition. At the same time, a very vicious and NOT amusing back-and-forth ensued over Memorial Day weekend between Keane and Wynter, and a slightly less vitriotic one between Keane and Mia. It really was toxic. I mean, BAD! The tide began to turn at that point. With no real Brangie “news” following that episode (which clearly turned a lot of posters off), the latest sordid speculative SR blog came out. Then many began to wonder about legal issues, and even Keane and Kate were commenting that they didn’t want to get involved (other than Keane’s typical harrassment of me and a few others).

    c) Keane is probably not Ian. She might be on his payroll to create controvery, and some of the fights w/ trolls/loons could be fabricated for that purpose. If she’s not on payroll, he’s allowed her to run the show for a while but it’s been backfiring of late.

    d) Kate very well sounds like someone on his payroll, as she manages to get in the mention of his upcoming Brangie book and it’s pub date whenever possible. If she truly isn’t, then I feel sorry for her, as she is very possibly being used.

    e) Keane and Kate may very well be posting as multiples. (Keep site busy; create controversy; validate ludricrous pov’s; etc.)

    f) Ian appears to be a journalist of primarily muckraking content. (Hats off to him for publishing a non-flattering book about Scientology and remaining alive, however.)

    g) I suspect that he had to back-off from major Brangie stories not only due to lack of real (or reliable) sources, but also because the speculation was getting too “hot” and his legal counsel told him to chill.

    h) As someone who wants a “name” in the biz, it makes sense he would love the attention. The danger, though, is that he has (and may continue to do so) let his posters hang themselves in the process…adding to controvery. (Example: When I first started posting there I came on too strong about my work history afyer Keane probed and probed. In answering truthfully, I inadvertently set myself up. Not knowing about Keane’s rep, I just dithered away about myself whenever she posed yet another probing q to me in her then underhanded, covert way until she could then slap me down. I was so incensed at being disbelieved that I am who I am that I emailed Ian and gave him my name and detailed work info and suggested he google me and that he could give my real name to Keane to google me as well…I still didn’t know what I was getting into, obviously. Ian wrote back, said he might want to interview me for one of his films, but he wasn’t sure what to do about Keane and I. Suggested that I try to approach her in “a different way” in the public forum. And that I did — to no avail and even more insidious suggestions and probings by the Mean One.

    In retrospect, Ian could have closed down the treatment of me by Keane w/ one of his little “shout-outs” to posters, which would have calmed the digging. I don’t/didn’t “need” his attention, but he could have helped a poster’ credibility. (True…even if googled I could still be a fake but there’s so much only the “real me” would know that it would be very unlikely someone would try to be “me”…and to what end? At the least, a “shout-out” that he had googled me and found it to be at the least “possible” that my claims were credible would have solved part, if not all, of the Keane-baiting.

    i) BTW, I did stand up to, and also fought w/ Keane a few times. I challenged her at other times. I also did agree w/ several of her and Kate’s opinions and said so.

    j) Keane is loving the attention we are giving her.

    k) I no more believe that she went to Oxford than GWB can spell his own name w/out thinking about it, “real hard.”

    l) The reason why I’m writing this is because I believe something is very rotten in Denmark and I want to weigh in w/ those who have written as much in this thread. IUC could be a great place to play around w/ gossip. You can have fun there. I did despite the Mighty Keane BS. BUT, it’s tarnished. And any owner/leader of a blog worth an ounce of respect should get it together and not use innocent people the way in which I am continuing to believe some have been used. I really liked a few of the poster’s a lot.

    m) I checked the site today and not only did I find the recent blogs to be pitiful, but the amount of former posters has gone down dramatically…and Keane is still yammering that I was a plant and an “obvious” one, too. She’s completely certain. She knows it all. She felt it in her “gut.” If that’s true, then her gut is very, very sick.

    n) Congrat’s to all of you who have stopped posting there. It’s Ian’s loss in the end. Some of those who are now posting here were fun and a good sources there.

    So, just wanted to lay out my thoughts about what has been written here and express a few more of my points about my experience as a warning to anyone who is actually credible and dares to challenge Keane on any level, or suggest anything that would cause this complete paranoid monster to assume you are a plant, or happen to be at all forthcoming about yourself. She doesn’t seem to be threatened by poster’s who work in non-industry jobs. But dare to stand on what she considers is her “turf” and you can punch her in the face or sit down for a civilized “work it out” chat and she’ll try to drag you down to her level. I rolled in the mud w/ her a few times. Needed a really loooomg shower after that![/quote}

    SZ
    Keane is not on Ian’s payroll. I have emailed him before and he inadvertently sent me one back yesterday evening thinking I was Keane. Because of the comments he made, I can safely state that.
    I also think that quite possibly he has made that mistake in the past and someone got her email account erroniously. With her reputation, that person was emailing Ian and he responded the same way that he responded to me, hence that is how her email got “hacked”. If I had a bone to pick with her I could have easily and GLEEFULLY been hateful with the email thing and done some googling. I just don’t have that kind of inkling and I actually like her when she stays “On Topic”. He was just careless. She is not aware of this yet but I will go to the site today and post it to her, without going into too much detail. No doubt she will be disappointed to find out that the “source” of her problems is not Angelina Jolie (*snort) but Ian himself!

    SZ, I said before that is her MO, if you will. Be nice to the newcomers, ask questions in a friendly way while she gathers “intel” then goes for the weak link in history, in her opinion, to prove to her cronies that there is yet another “plant” or (hee hee) Angelina Jolie herself! TADA! She validated her own reasoning and the flock bought it. I have seen her on the web for over a year on another site and that is her real personality. I don’t defend her when these attacks are going on. She wears big girl panties as well as the next person so I see no need. We may disagree on how we have reached our conclusions but we are still very much “antis” in the same boat.

    Keane gets off to the fact that other people on different web sites have discussed her. She loves her “beotch” reputation for that very reason. She may not post on them but for sure, she is a lurker. (I thought that one or two of the posts on this thread as Guest were from her.)

    As for Kate, I really like her. She is very knowedgable in all things Angelina and must have bookmarks to every site that has ever mentioned her name. I have never seen her post anywhere other than here on this thread and at IUC. She didn’t seem comfortable when posting here and she uses her same screen name. She might possibly be on his payroll but with the revenue he takes in from that site, I doubt it.

    As to the reasoning behind starting that blog, how it became an “anti” site, and SRRC thing, see my post above so I don’t have to constantly beat that same drum. LOL!

    Anyway, these are things I believe about IUC. It would never have become an “anti” site if it weren’t for the Angelina History Month series and that was his floater (An abreviated proposal to Simon and Schuster or whatever publishing firm?) to see if doing an expose on her, ala his Kurt Cobain tome, would be of interest and whether or not it would be profitable to shop a book. He found out it would be and now he is chin deep in having to keep producing tidbits to feed the masses over there.

    I hope that you continue posting on this site. I always enjoyed your commentaries. I like it here very much and if the topics are too extreme for my taste, there is always another thread to go to. I prefer this site format for that very reason.
    Last edited by DebFrmHell on Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:39 pm, edited 2 times in total. Top

    Reply
  99. DebFrmHell said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:44 am

    Keane and I have dealt with each other on other sites for over a year and she understands that I will post my opinion. She woudn’t have it any other way and neither would I. I can’ t think of a time when we have had a fight about it. We reach conclusions in differing manners but we seem to always reach the same one. Same with Kate. I would have drug the post over here rather than to encapsulate the email thing.

    No need for interblog wars here.

    BTW, those are two posts put together. One is from SZ and where the SZ in bold starts is my reply.

    Reply
  100. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    @Patty Anne:

    That was very interesting Patty Anne thank you. I have to say I don’t waste time looking on other boards to see what others think of me because this is just not a big deal to me at all. There was so much that was wrong about both of those posts but I am just going to let it slide. I still think SZ was a plant because she made so many mistakes with the things she said, was clearly trying to befriend and ingratiate herself with other posters, began by trying to defend Angelina in different ways and then when she kept getting caught out tried her hardest to demolish my reputation. It does not surprise me at all that she has gone on to another board to try to do this even more and I expect it is being done on other blogs too. As for me being threatened by other people’s contacts that really is utter BS, I love talking to people who can give me an insight into HW such as Kate, Ian, Section 9 and Harikari Girl. I just don’t like it when they are obviously making it up (Me/well, Margarita, and yes SZ). And they always go for the Oxford and BBC thing, its so funny, it makes their strategies so transparent. And as for enjoying my “beyotch” reputation well that really is an utter load of BS, none of what goes on here matters to me in the slightest, I am only interested in the stories and chatting to the people who I like. Just goes to show how little people who encounter you on the net actually know about you. Whatever. I think its time people got a life and stopped talking about me. I really have much better things to do and so should they!

    Reply
  101. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:53 am

    BTW I never post on other sites or read them. And I have only ever posted on here under the one username. I really don’t have time for all this nonsense. I’m so sick of it.

    Reply
  102. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    I wondered if you hadn’t pasted two separate posts into one on that page ( IU Hostility page 11 on FF) as it seemed extremely long to me, however i did read it all as you posted it there. Deb, i am a firm believer in being a straight shooter…to a person’s face so to say. I felt that for what you posted about this site and it’s regulars on FemaleFirstForum.com, you should be able to say here, to IAN and Kate and Keane as it is your take on things here. Only fair dear.@DebFrmHell:

    Reply
  103. DebFrmHell said on June 7th, 2009 at 11:38 am

    @Patty Anne:
    This is the comment that started the conversation with SZ. I see no slams toward Ian, Keane or Kate in it. You are seeing mountains where I am seeing molehills.

    “I have said this before. If you go back thru the history of the blog, Ian H have many varied interest posted there. He didn’t get very much response for his posting and for a while he seemed determined to “out” every celeb known to mankind ala Perez H. without drawing inane things on their pictures. And possibly to promote his Hollywood Undercover book by renewing interest in it.

    It wasn’t until he posted is Angelina History series that the site became an “anti” site. His recap was well written and researched. His current flock clamor for any tidbit about them and them only. I am not so sure that he is thrilled with the way that has played out but he is not about to look a gift horse in the mouth. He is now getting 100x the hits he used to on a daily basis. Investigative reporting takes a lot of time and the posters are not willing to give him that.

    I personally believe that he uses SRRC to spew out things that he cannot get signed off on and the clues are open to interpretation to the masses. He doesn’t really guide them and they reach conclusions that sane people would scoff at. Those conclusions become perpetuated and streamlined to fit beliefs of his fans. Next thing you know, the conclusions are fact.

    I really liked that site and posted there for a while. It just got too dark and the things posters were willing to believe regarding parentage, incest, beastiality, and rape were just too much for me. Add to that a daily influx of infighting…

    Ian needs to control his board but his other interests are what keeps a roof over his head. He would be living in a hovel, eating Ramen noodles if he were trying to survive on that site alone.”

    That said, I haven’t been posting here because of the darkness that pervades these threads. If you think I should be saying things to a persons face why would you be the one to just bring just this. I agree with Keane. It is tedious and just more than a little ridiculous to stir an empty pot. Bring the whole thread next time.

    Reply
  104. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    Deb, i was not attempting to make mountains out of molehills, and what i posted here was CCP exactly as it appears on page 11 of IU Hostility on Female First Forum, in fact, if you scroll back you will see that i tried to get Keane to go to http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/iuc-hostility-t226877-150.html to read this herself and form her own , independant opinion. I believe that if one posts one should stand by what they post and not look for reasons it isn’t read as it is shown. It is also noted you edited this post 2 times …. so what is the problem? BTW….i’m finished with this. Anyone who wishes can click on FF URL, page 11 and read the entire thing between you and SZ themselves. @DebFrmHell:

    Reply
  105. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    Also DebFmHell….i must tell you i love the photo shops you do! Especially the one of Brad with the dog on the park bench!….Hilarious!

    Reply
  106. DebFrmHell said on June 7th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Would love to take credit for that becaue it IS freaking hysterical. That is the work of the Photoshopping GUEST. Look for the horses. There is one that says “Brad get your aaassssssssssssssssssssss back in her now” that is particularly funny. It is in the I Feel Like Photoshopping Today” I will go and bump it back up since it is probably on page 2 or 3 by now.

    As to the edits, I was backspacing in the beginning and went too far. I went in and added “]
    ” to try to separate the two posts. When that didn’t work, I went back for the second time to Bold and Enlarge the print as to distinguish the two. That is why it appears to be such a long big post. No big deal.

    Thanks for the entertainment. I forgot about the dog/BP/Horse!

    Reply
  107. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    And BTW re: SZ, if people can’t see from that completely unnecessary post, full of total BS about me and Ian and Kate that her M.O. is to discredit all three of us and stop people from believing anything that is posted on this blog then I don’t know what will. The typical BS about not believing where I went to college, the ludicrous suggestion that Kate works for Ian or Kate and I post as each other or other people, the also ludicrous suggestion that I am here to stir up trouble, the typical insult that Ian is a muckraker and is using people here and will hang us all out to dry, come on now! If people can’t see what this woman is about then I really do give up. Why would she have come here and posted here in the first place if that was her opinion of Ian. She is so full of shit all I can do is laugh that anyone would believe a word she says. She made sure to stick the knife in to me at considerable length before she posted here and she has taken great time and put in a lot of effort to do it elsewhere. I can’t believe anyone would care so much about what goes on here to bother to do that. And this is supposedly a 58 year old media pofessional who nearly went blind and has got her sight back and all she cares about is trying to diss me and this site when she has been posting here for a matter of weeks. It is ludicrous and nonsensical. If SZ is a real person then I sincerely hope she gets the help that she needs. But I don’t think she is folks, that’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it, whatever anyone else may think or think of me.

    Reply
  108. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    @Keane:

    That was supposed to say “before she finished posting here”.

    Reply
  109. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    Actually i didn’t feel any sort of connection with SZ mainly because she seemed to me to be here more to force you to accept her than to discuss the topics of the blog. I know this sounds weird, but she reminded me of a kid in the playground who wanted the girl who was in the center of play activities to look to her to join in with them rather than having her make the move herself. It was as if your opinion mattered to her more than her personal take on any given topic. I actually felt sorry for her to be coming across as so needy, if you will. And i mean no insult to her here. Some people have a much harder time fitting in, and may in desperation, go the wrong direction to feel accepted. Who knows though. Life is hard enough for most of us these days that we certainly don’t need to look for issues we have to use so much gray matter resolving. I’m here for entertainment, friendship, and good chat about The Evil Dark Queen of HW. I don’t care if you are tall, short, fat, thin, pretty, or homely, rich or poor, hetro , bi, or gay…..friendships and good conversation transcends all that…. All in all. This is a very different blog from any other i’ve lurked in, in that so many are satisfied with their lives and feel absolutely NO need to bash others to enjoy time spent here. The occassional LoonieTune is only coming here, in my opinion, to get a rise out of Keane….war of words….perhaps the only way they feel successful in their rather pitiful lives. I think Kate had the right plan….use our private IGNORE button, and soon they will tire of bla bla bal to only themselves. I honestly do not intend to even read what they post , just skim over and if i see another gutter fighter on the prow, skip it all….we don’t need their pain.@Keane:

    Reply
  110. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yes, and coming from a 58 year old inhabitant of the HW hills, pioneering 70’s rock DJ and seasoned TV professional that is just completely bizarre behaviour to me. From the very outset she addressed everything to me and made everything about me, as if it was only my opinion that counted. She also from word go tried to ingratiate herself with and befriend other posters in a very forced way rather than simply rocking up, posting a comment about the story and engaging in a discussion and gradually forming friendsips from there. It just wasn’t normal human behaviour. And every time you asked her something she would give one explanation, think about it, then come back with a revised, slightly more convincing one at a later date. And to call me a “monster” after everything I adressed to her I tried to do in a respectful way is just out of control. But there you go, you can’t help what people want to say about you on the internet so I won’t waste any more time thinking about it.

    Just as a general FYI for other people reading and commenting here though I will just say this. I do not enjoy being discussed either on this blog or anywhere else for that matter. I do not take pride in my “beyotch” reputation one iota. In fact I would much rather no-one talked about me at all, but seeing as they do I would rather laugh at it than get too worked up about it. I do not consider commenting on this blog an achievement in life, it is just idle entertainment, something that keeps me amused when I am working on something at home alone. The point of me being here is purely to chat to the friends I have made here, to find out about what is really going on in HW and the world, not what the PR people and studios want us to believe, and hopefuly to prevent people manipulating and exploiting other indiviuals for their own financial gain (and I think we all know who I am talking about there). If the odd person finds anything I have to say informative or entertaining then that is all to the good, but other than trying to unpick the PR lies that are spun to the public, I don’t really care what anyone else ultimately thinks of what I have to say here. It has become so much about me that it is a joke now, so lets’ try to focus on the stories. And as for SZ’s ludicrous claim that regulars are leaving here in droves, she may find that that is because we haven’t had too many new stories lately. I love her for trying to stir up as much trouble as she could though, if that doesn’t tell you what she was really here for then I don’t know what does. Anyway, on with the show!

    Reply
  111. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    I wonder how IAN is feeling ? I know the flu is miserable this year, but i am hoping with all his time away, he will have some really good stuff for those of us loyal to his expose’ on The Brand. Seems to me things are heating up in a serious, and much faster pace with The Brand than during a month ago, so the blow up, whatever it may be, is due to hit soon, imo. I understand how Brad feels judging by his actions and/or lack of. I too was trapped in a bad marriage, one in which i fell out of love with my partner due to his physcho behaviours, and i acted much like Brad is now. Make an appearance for family peace, but high tail it out of Dodge asap when i’d been noticed to have been there at all. Plan to be busy at the opposite end of the planet from his duties, holidays were Hell if i had to be around for any length of time with a false smile on my lips. Behind closed doors it was all about his temper tantrums, his wants, his needs, his way about all things. Yep, i know where Brad is coming from and his actions now just mirror my own 10 years ago.

    Reply
  112. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    BTW I failed to mention that after much dating, and meeting new people, i fell in love with the man i should have spent most of my life with, and he with me. We have been married some years now, and it only gets better with each passing one. This is what love really is all about, and it’s worth the wait for it to find you. My happiness is unbounded, he treats me with much love, respect, and compassion. I’ve never shared so much laughter with anyone else in my life before him. So if Brad will seriously grow up, wait for the right one to find him, he will too reap the rewards of a true love, a lasting love and happiness that goes with it

    Reply
  113. Keane said on June 7th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Aw well that is a positive story which gives the unlucky in love portion of this planet a bit of hope I must say! I just think for Brad though the HW environment has distorted his thinking to such an extent that whether he will ever find that is questionable to me. Whatever anyone says to me an open relationship can never work, because how you could ever trust your partner fully I do not know. And if you’re bi, and I know plenty of people who are, you just pick the one that makes more sense to you and you feel happier with. Most people, when it comes down to it, have a preference, and if you don’t just accept that if you’re with one at a certain time, you can’t also be with the other. You can’t always have your cake and eat it, which unfortunately a lot of HW types think they can. Is it really that much of a sacrifice to just commit to one or the other for the timebeing. But I think what tends to happen is that people meet someone they fancy but they’re not in love with, or someone they’re in love with, but they don’t fancy that much so it never works out. People don’t seem to want to be alone for long and just wait for that person to turn up, they want it all now. But love doesn’t work that way, you can’t control it like you can your career or your finances or whatever. It is out of your hands to a great extent. I really don’t think Brad has met that person yet, but he just needs to chill out and wait for a bit. He is a serial monogamist and I think he would be much better off just playing the field and waiting for the right one to turn up eventually. There’s just too much desire for instant gratification in my view. But yeah I really wouldn’t want to be in his position right now, not only going through it all but all in full view of the public. It is a monster of his own creation though, he pimped the relationship out and he’s going to have to deal with the consequences when it crumbles. Why do these people never think about this when they start out? Too busy raking in the cash I guess!

    Reply
  114. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    OR, their egos are so huge, they don’t believe it will ever turn on them. Like a junky’s high, they are indestructable! They are so accustomed to sex with other than their partner, having to perform sex act simulation in movies all the time, that i feel it soon loses it’s Tabu Value to them. If they love their spouse, but feel the “hots” for a co-star, so many just go for it, as i think Brad did with Angie who did her best Siren Act on him during MAMS, then live to regret the fantasy of the perfect partner. I can’t now remember who, but one big HW star is suing her co-star ( not a new movie) for “penetrating” her during a sex scene in the movie. What? She wasn’t wearing the flesh colored body suit? Went NAKED like ANGIE did in MAMS? After awhile they become so jaded that sex is no more or less to most of the HW crowd than getting drunk or high. Recreational … How very sad that they have formed their own tinsel town version of sodom and gomorrah . Brad made so many dumb-ass press comments about Angie’s superior star power over Jennifer’s that i turned on him from that moment on. Even though Brad and Jennifer’s Plan B production company owned rights to AMH, and Jennifer was set for the role of Marrianne Pearl, Brad held an insulting press conference to make the above statement of why AJ got the role. JERK!….He is so totally into himself that he will never find a woman to truly love…he’s too in love with himself imo@Keane:

    Reply
  115. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Wasn’t there gossip about that with Donald Sutherland and Julie Christy awhile back also? On screen sex scene got too real? Those people in HW stun me with their lack of morals.

    Reply
  116. Straightalkexpress said on June 7th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    For once I agree with you Patty Anne, regarding SZ’S neediness. It came across very forced “please accept me” !! She went completely overboard with details and she wouldn’t leave Keane nor Kate alone. But, I still think Keane went above and beyond bullying. I really don’t care who’s in the industry. Why take that much time out to question someone???. I could see if Ian felt a need to do but, he didn’t so just let SZ and other’s be. Nor I do agree with calling Angeline Jolie the Evil Queen. Seems a bit child-like to do and we really don”t know her personally to say one way or the other.

    Reply
  117. Vittorio said on June 7th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Oh Patty Anne, you most likely wouldn’t have appreciated him before and that is why he came into your life when he did, when you were ready and able to receive the appreciation that you deserve

    Reply
  118. Straightalkexpress said on June 7th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @Keane:

    Keane to be honest,alot of the regulars are leaving this board. I’ve seen them posting elsewhere. Most of them indicate your behaviour as being one of the reasons. Aside, from the fact that Ian has not one iota of credibility when it comes to Brangie stories,who’s gay in HW etc.. Unless it’s something that’s already been reported by tabs, other blogs and proving to true. He piggybacks and rehashes most of his stories. Other’s are completely bull. You being in the industry with such “keen” detective skills, should have been a bit more reluctant to just swallow everything he says. I do enjoy some of Ian’s other stories. They seem informative. I even enjoyed one of his books.

    Reply
  119. Straightalkexpress said on June 7th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    That is not the only thread where DebFrmHell has commented. Check the “IS IUC CREDIBLE” thread. She slames Keane and in another. I hate when people come in and say one thing and then edit and change what they wrote to attempt to play nice. Noone over there likes Keane that posted in those threads, the same for Crazy Day an Nights,E entertainment, Data Lounge and the list goes on and on. Deb, what’s up with you changing your tune?

    Reply
  120. Straightalkexpress said on June 7th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/post3193985.html#p3193985

    DebFrmHell
    Wet behind the ears

    Posts: 117
    Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 1:41 am

    Is it wrong of me to think of K & K with spread sheets on their computers tracking timelines? Copy/pasting to their little hearts content? Bookmarking any reference to the Burmuda Triangle? And that they only post on The Brand? Gees, and I thought I had no life as I am too hooked by the Brand!!!

    I loves me some MK. He is always willing to throw a bullchit flag on celebs and I love it when he posts a Saint Angie. He must be farting glitter bombs and dancing with unicorns on top of rainbows all the while snuggling kittens over the head bump…

    You can read the rest here along with everyone’s elses post. Deb is the one who told us about Keane’s behavior @ dlisted. Plus, if you just go around the boards you can see pretty much in any IUC thread there is always talk about how unstable IUC’s posters come across particulary Keane, second Kate and then the ones that just follow everything they say.

    Don’t shoot the messenger.

    Reply
  121. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    So…..here it is Sunday night, 9:00, and still no IAN, SR, or Mz9cents…..It’s been a week it seems since we’ve had any real information. We’ve gone over and over what we had to begin with, and i am pretty much out of things to chew over. I noticed today no Kate, no TopBrit, no Canuck, harikari girl…..guess people are busy on weekends though. I think i’ll go play a rousing game of scrabble with my daughter…..good night all

    Reply
  122. Ms Agatha said on June 7th, 2009 at 8:46 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    I was going to write a very similar post last night – but decided not to – kept checking here for a new post couple of times today – just wanted to let you know that I feel very much the same – you are not alone in this lol

    Reply
  123. Vittoria said on June 7th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-06-06/berlusconis-racy-photo-scandal/?cid=hp:beastoriginalsL4

    There is more on the link above, but I think we may just have the perfect politician for AJ!

    Silvio Berlusconi knows how to throw a party. Rumors have swirled for decades that gluttonous bashes at his Sardinian villa rivaled the best ancient Roman orgies. Topless girls, live music, and free-flowing Champagne were just the beginning. And some of the festivities were snapped by a local photographer who has made a career of staking out Berlucsconi’s seaside getaway.

    These parties, and these photos, have become the focus of a smear campaign against the prime minister, who has been under fire recently for his flashy personal life. Last month, his wife of 19 years filed for divorce after he attended the 18th-birthday party of Noemi Letizia, a young lingerie model with whom has been accused of having an affair. Now an investigation is under way in Rome into whether he inappropriately used government airplanes to ferry guests to and from his 150-acre estate known as Villa Certosa in Sardinia.

    Berlusconi maintains these attacks are the work of political opponents ahead of elections for the European Parliament this weekend, for which Berlusconi’s party has fielded a slate of bosomy female candidates. And he is fighting back by exerting control over his media empire. Berlusconi went to court last week to block publication of some 700 paparazzi photos by Sardinian photographer Antonello Zappadu, many of which were taken at a New Year’s Eve party that Letizia attended. He also persuaded prosecutors to investigate allegations that Zappadu had invaded his privacy.

    Reply
  124. Patty Anne said on June 7th, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    Thank you Ms Agatha. It seems to be an empty hall tonight. I know we had our share of rable rousers upsetting the board, but i had hoped with most of them gone things would get back to a nice, respectful normal. Hope Kate is alright, she posted earlier this morning that IAN came back from Montreal with the flu….that is no fun i know! Keane was here earlier, but it’s her bedtime in the UK. Being a Sunday night one expects it to be slowed down, people have family, friends over for bar-b-ques and such in the summer months i know, but the lack of updates has left me feeling like an orphaned child…BUT don’t tell Jolie!!!….lol@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  125. Ms Agatha said on June 7th, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Don’t feel orphaned now…… you got us ! lol I will check back here after work tomorrow….. really hope to find some news here by then……. if not, don.t know what to do my life anymore, I am a sucker for this site lol and a good night to you

    Reply
  126. Kate said on June 7th, 2009 at 10:21 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Hey Patty Anne, I don’t live in the U.K. I am a US citizen. :) My little sweetie had an emergengy ,bleeding , rupture, will not go into details, but had to go the vet. All is okay but I babysitting now.. :) Not a nice day it seems. I was reading at FF, very disheartening to see my friends there that , or I thought were just really bashin me . I had no idea they felt that way about me. I wish they had just told me when they were here. No one ever said a word. Just the loons called me names, but not the ones who I thought were my friends.

    Reply
  127. DebFrmHell said on June 7th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    Kate I never read anything bad about you. People tend to clump you and Keane together but you were never accused of being mean. Heck, I don’t even remember ever “hearing” you even swear! Don’t be depressed.

    Glad your pooch is OK. Everyday the dog gets better will brighten your mood! I promise. I lost my dog last October 28th but he was hardly ever sick and when he got run over once (he was always into something, like the mutt version of Marley) I was sick with worry for the first couple of days. Every day that he got better, so did I!

    Best Wishes,
    Deb

    Reply
  128. Z said on June 7th, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Hey Deb, did your dog get better? I coudn’t tell. You must have been so worried!! But you lost it? : ( We just got a puppy…our first ever and I can’t believe the love she brings into the house.

    @Kate:
    Kate, I don’t know if you saw my responses, but I wanted to come over to tell you that I never bashed you. And I am sad that you are upset. It has me upset, too. I think you are a good person, and not mean at all. You are the voice of reason, many times. Anyway, I needed to say that. Maybe if Ian gets a moderator…if things even out a little, I’ll be able to post on both sights. The fighting, anger, etc, gets me really upset. I wish I could ignore it…I’m not good at that. I hope your dog is OK!! They really are members of our families.

    Reply
  129. ruby said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:37 am

    @Patty Anne:

    Looks like Ian really returned since he is back to his old habit of deleting every post that doesn`t support him or his ideas!

    To Patty Anne!
    I have my doubts that Pitt enjoys your kind of support that includes bashing his current (ex)girlfriend. Because wether or not they have already split or are going to split one fact remains: they will alwyas have a certain connection thanks to their kids. It would be in everyones interest if they acted civil towards eachother.

    Reply
  130. Kate said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:41 am

    I have decided after all that I have read tonight that I am going to take a break from here and see how this site pans out. I am really disheartened at all of this, and there does not seem to be anything to discuss so pershaps that is why things have gotten so bad. Thank you Z and Dev for cour comments.

    Reply
  131. Kate said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:08 am

    That commented posted before I meant it to as my baby (little dog) is in my lap recuperating. Patty Ann, goo luck with your surgery, hope all goes well for you and you recovery with as little pain as possible. Keane, hope things improve here and Ian does get a moderator and the board gets back to normal, calmer, just interesting conversation. I will check in down the road and see how things are going but for now I need to take a break. I am just really disheartened with all the smack talk from so many that I have posted with over the months and so it just does not feel the same to me now, at least not right now. Hugs to all you guys!

    Catch you at some point later on. Carry on !

    Cheers, Kate

    Reply
  132. meg said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:46 am

    @Ian,

    Angelina wants to marry brad, according to yahoo. Read this (in french):
    http://fr.news.yahoo.com/5/20090608/ten-angelina-jolie-et-brad-pitt-et-maint-e95f385.html

    What do you think? Is it true?

    Reply
  133. Straightalkexpress said on June 8th, 2009 at 8:17 am

    @Kate:

    Your behavior on the rape story was completely out of line. You basically said you believed Angeline went along with rape. I didn’t buy that story but, if true why is it so hard to believe she could have been harmed? To take a disgusting perverts side on things as a woman was sickening. You keep saying your disheartened to read people feel your a whack job . But, go back and read your post Kate. I have seen many times when people other than the brangie super fans state they felt uncomfortable with ,you not just the krazy Keane. You might not be as abrasive as Keane but, your as forceful and luv to brow beat people with your over the top speculation about Brangie. Then pull the “you don’t know what I know” card. You have done that more than a few times. You don’t know anything either dear. I thought you were more grounded than Keane but, this naivete about not knowing how you have offended people and how your just this innocent wallflower is ridiculous. Your just as vicious as Keane and your a plant too. You go on other boards plugging this site and defending IAN HELPERIN as if you know him personally for many years and have a reason to take what he says as true soley just cause he said it. Yourplay games with the posters as if to question Ian but, it always end in some bizarre speculation and making the story sound plausible when anyone with half a brain would know this crap aint true. No one has to like Angelina,Jen,Brad but, these people don’t pay your bills either. So, to put so much time and effort into every move they make is plain silly. If your going to take a break would it be so bad?

    Reply
  134. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    I understand Kate. When i went to FF to catch up on their take, some of them have really great ideas and research tools, i was stunned to see what was happening. It was as if when some of them were in this forum, they couldn’t be nicer, more kind , thoughtful people, but when they were there, in that horrible topic they set up specifically to bash us here, i was hurt, shocked, and very disappointed. Seems it was more games, like the Team Jolie/ Team Aniston, only they created Team FF/ Team IU. As one of them was actively posting here when i read what was being posted simutaneously over there, i felt Keane had a right to be informed. I did what i believed was right. I did not bash anyone, call anyone names or in any way attack anyone for their take on the topic here. I’m very disappointed that the only other site i have found that agrees with my belief about Jolie/Pitt has so insulted us here.@Kate:

    Reply
  135. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 8:29 am

    As my surgery is looming quickly before me, i think i’ll take the cue from Kate and have a break from this. I will peek in once in awhile after my surgery next week, and i’m able again to sit upright, but i can only hope that those who started the bashing and created the Team FF/ Team IU come to realize that they are dividing the only two resources out there that supported outting Ms Jolie for what she is. Infighting weakens any cause. Keane look forward to seeing you , Kate, TopBrit, Vittoria, and all the others again some day. I’ve truly enjoyed our Sherlock Holmes sessions here…. Hopefully IAN will resolve this situation for us.

    Reply
  136. Straightalkexpress said on June 8th, 2009 at 8:39 am

    @Patty Anne:

    No Patty Anne, you didn’t do that out of the good concious. You were wrong for doing that. There are other sites as well, that people post every now and then about IUC. The general consensus is that Keane is crazy and so is Kate and some of the others. You are trying to make this about FF VS IUC but, this is not the case. A simple google, and browsing on other boards would clear of your misconceptions. I wouldn’t act all hurt now. First off, aren’t you an adult? So why put so much emphasis on how complete strangers view you? They have a right to their opinions right? They came in and were cordial but, they got tired of the infighting, the very childish nature on this board. “The in crowd” and it’s followers, you being a follower. Mainly, due to Ian’s an SR’s stories are complete and utter bull crap. You are plain rude to anyone that doesn’t regard what Keane says as gold. You, yourself are just as guilty if not more, for running people off of this site. You have been living and breathing through this site as if it’s yours. You or Keane are completly incapable of having a rational debate with anyone who may disagree. When Keane is bullying someone you happily partake in it and then you play shocked later. This isn’t about FF and you are hardly innocent. Your just as vicious as Keane minus all the foul language and bullying. You like to cosign on everything she does.

    Reply
  137. Straightalkexpress said on June 8th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    @Patty Anne:

    Outing Angelina for what? For what she is? Honey you are obviously not in sync with how it works in Hollywood. To out miss Jolie , would mean to out most of hollywood. You get nowhere in hollywood being nice and friendly. Your reasons for hating someone you never have met or truly no nothing about is beyond sad. We all gossip but, she’s hardly the worst offender of homewrecking, drugs, and a dark past in hollywood. She’s just the one you seem so obsessed with.

    Reply
  138. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:00 am

    Dear Derailed Express. Your comments in reply to my take says all that needs to be said about the FF IU Hostility thread, only it’s you who is hostile, agressive, argumentative, and insincere in what you claim to be…a friend to some here. Take your Team FF vx Team IU and live your life in that manner if you so choose. I prefer to have discussions and debates without hate, bashing, or sneaking around behind another’s back…now that is childish behaviour. I’m sorry for your anger, however i had no part in creating such an angry person in this life. I sincerely hope you find inner peace so that you no longer need to have fighting as your only stimulous in life. I’m not angry, not a bit. Your comments do not insult me or hurt me in any way. To me, this is just a blog/message board, and i can not choose the people with which i associate, but attempt to get along with those of opposing opinions without degressing to Kindergarten Playgroung Clique fights. Have at it….i’m gone@Straightalkexpress:

    Reply
  139. Straightalkexpress said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am

    @Patty Anne:

    lol. You are truly a head case . I see you like to read what you like and then twist the rest.. lol

    If my comments don’t insult you then why the hell are you posting about the F&F? There was no hostility there. Again, your just wrong. Go an browse CDAN, DLISTED,DATALOUNGE,E ENTERTAINMENT,ETC… These people aren’t hostile or angry nor am I. You don’t want to believe that people think your a loon. Perhaps, it’s the way you come off.

    Reply
  140. Liin said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    @Straightalkexpress:

    oh come one now ppl, these sites are for gossip rumours, whether the stories are complete crap or started by a hint of truth, who cares, why does everyone take all this so seriously, IF SOMETHING YOU READ OFFENDS YOU – DONT READ IT, IF SOMETHING ON THE TV OFFENDS, YOU WOULD TURN IT OFF, now how come common sense like that doesn’t seem to work on these blogs. There is freedom of speech and everyone is allowed to think what they like, if you dont agree, dont read it, go elsewhere. I also think, if people are of that a nervous disposition, and get upset by others, maybe these sites are not for them.

    Lets stop the infighting, no one is better or worse than anyone else, we are all equal as far as being human goes, lets lighten up a little, there are far more serious/important things in life to get worked up about.

    More gossip please on that funny old facade called Hollywood.

    It will be interesting to see what nasty replys I get to this post – can I have faith in human nature?

    Reply
  141. cuze said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    @Liin:
    keep the faith….

    Reply
  142. Liin said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:35 am

    To Kate & Patty Anne, (and Keane – although dont think you said you are going)

    Dont take any notice of anyone, you have support on this board you know that, please just try and ignore the messages that dont matter from negative ppl and trouble makers, just dont read them, it takes a bit of willpower but you will feel better for it. No one should make you feel you have to go.

    IAN – is there any gossip? peoples brain cells need to be used! xx

    Reply
  143. Straightalkexpress said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:42 am

    @Liin:

    LOL. I think you missed the whole point completly. Can I have faith in human nature and common sense? Your attacking me but, trying to come across as the voice of reason. We all have our opinions. It’s nice to know yet again another cosigner on IANUNDERCOVER.COM feels the need to play attack dog. LOL
    If you took the time to read my post up thread then, you would know, I stated I like some of even’s stories and books.. >>>>>>>>>Next

    Reply
  144. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    You make a very clear case of my opinion of the “in fighting”….IAN dosen’t have a Topic on his Blog called, “FEMALE FIRST HOSTILITY” in which all or most of us would bash you for how you post, what you say, your personal opinions, complete with name calling , assumptions, etc. That is the difference. To anyone who understands English language, For FF to post that as one of it’s topic’s of discussion implies that there is something wrong with IU, that it ( we who blog here) is hostile to all , when in fact, it’s just a group effort to create dicention between two sites. When two don’t try to come to a peaceful understanding, both lose in the end. Open dialog, discussion is healthy. Two opposing views compared, and discussed in an adult manner. And as adults, as someone else said earlier, we can choose who we listen to, as well as who we respond to. Change the channel if you don’t like what you read. I did rather like Kate’s idea of the “mental ignore” button. It’s a shame IAN didn’t put one here, as i feel it would have put a stop to this before it began. It takes two to fight, i am not into fighting, but rather logic. I will attempt to explain, and come to a comprimising conclusion, but i won’t lose sleep over what happens on a blog site. Sometimes i worry about our species, with the world as it is now, with the two correspondants being sentenced to 12 years of hard labour in North Korea, here we are ….. IU HOSTILITY on FF….a very adult attempt to come to a comprimise wasn’t it? @Straightalkexpress:

    Reply
  145. Liin said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:53 am

    @Straightalkexpress:

    now this sums it up really doesnt it, you want to fight my friend, neither of my posts ‘attacked’ you, if I am wrong, please state exactly which bit was at you, it was a general post to everyone, both ‘insiders and outsiders’ as I was getting a bit down with the atmosphere around here.
    You are too negative for me, dont bother replying as I wont read it.

    I did read your post and hence why i have nothing against you, but I will now state that your long post are coming accross as a bit righteous and bordering on bullying – IMO.

    Reply
  146. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Hey Patty Anne, I’ve checked in a couple of times to see what was up, but I honestly had no idea that people were doing their posts under the “let’s go to space” thread. I was still posting on the AJ birthday wishes…

    Reply
  147. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    I know, when i find it nearly empty i have to hop around to find everyone. Some are now posting on David Carradine topic…. Good to see you again harikari girl :-) @harikari girl:

    Reply
  148. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    @Liin:

    Amen to that! On with the show folks!

    Reply
  149. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:12 am

    @Patty Anne:
    I posted this, but somehow I managed to lose it after hitting return. Anyway, what I said was that a large portion of mankind is two faced and they have been way before the internet was ever created. Anyone that will say one thing to your face and the opposite behind your back is not a person worth knowing, nor of lending any of your energy to.

    I don’t need to fight about who’s right or who’s wrong on this board to know that. I don’t have to drink the kool aid nor discredit Ian. I don’t need to go over to another forum and see what has and hasn’t been said. Regardless of it all, two faced is two faced, and in this world that only continues to get faster and more complicated, it’s such a basic principle to know that people who are that disingenuous are not people worth investing yourself or your feelings in.

    Reply
  150. sheen said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    @Patty Anne:
    ITA. I hardly post but i love to read here at IUC. I’ve been reading previous threads for the past 2 weeks, you guys debate any questions each other which is normal for me… You people even questions Ian about some info when you have doubt. I dont find anything wrong with it.

    Anyway, I wish you guys just ignore whatever people said at FF. I went there to see what is all about. Its scary over there… This site, I like very much… Food for my brain.

    Reply
  151. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:20 am

    Well put….thank you for that. I was beginning to feel as if i were the only person to feel that way. I will never understand the “need” for conflict to feel validated. Or to make a statement for effect rather than for belief..@harikari girl:

    Reply
  152. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    As for SZ – I must admit that she made me slightly uncomfortable and I never believe people here are plants. I generally don’t bother to waste the time on wondering about people’s motives and I’m not a lemming. I’m not going to blindly follow what Keane says, what Ian says, what Kates say, nada. And that is NOT a derogatory remark about/to Kate or Keane. It’s simply having the freedom to make up one’s own mind indepedently. That being said, I felt something was off with SZ. After she found out I lived in the Hollywood Hills, she was very quick to jump on the fact that she did to and were we neighbors. And maybe I’ve become paranoid living out here and being in the industry, but it’s pretty much the norm if you live in the Hollywood Hills that you do so for privacy, discretion, ( the view, no doubt about it), but mainly your privacy and not having people riding by your house. Anyway, there was something in that little interaction that stuck out like a sore thumb even though I could not put my finger on it. It made me uncomfortable. So.. that’s my experience with that matter, for as much or as little as it’s worth.

    @Patty Anne:
    and Patty Anne, sorry if I’ve seemed in absentia, but I’m a major insomniac so I find I mostly post at crazy hours.

    Reply
  153. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:29 am

    Thank you sheen. I sent an email to IAN this morning explaining the need for an Ignore Button here. Hopefully he will comply. I too enjoy this site as a whole, it is indeed thought provoking, with intelligent dialog on the topics. The problems here began with the constant assults upon certain posters, which, imo, would stop immediately for us if we do get the Ignore Button requested. @sheen:

    Reply
  154. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    @harikari girl:

    Harikari Girl, BTW I know I’m meant to dislike you and all because you have industry contacts and I hate everyone who does and am threatened by them blah blah blah but I am actually keen to hear what good goss you might have up your sleeve for us! Also, do you mind saying what you do? It sounded from what you were saying about the meeting with Execs that you’re an actress but maybe I got that wrong and you are on the production side? If you don’t want to say that’s fair enough but I’d be interested to find out.

    Reply
  155. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:36 am

    I understand. I felt SZ was not kosher, in that it seemed more important to her to please Keane than to form an independent thought. To me, that meant she was on this site to impress Keane more than to get into the depth of the topic. Maybe i misunderstood her, however, i don’t think so. This site is very unlike the gossip sites, in that IAN seems to be able to come up with things that haven’t hit the magazines, paps yet, and we get to do our Sherlock Holmes on them, which i find entertaining and time passing on sleepless nights. I too have sleeping problems off and on….drats! I hope IAN complies with my request for an Ignore Button, but as i’m so very new here, i don’t know if he will agree with my take on matters. Nice to have met you harrikari girl, and i do so enjoy your take on the topics, you have an insite and understanding of things i don’t possess, so it gives me another way of thinking about the topic….i appreciate that…. @harikari girl:

    Reply
  156. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:36 am

    @Patty Anne:

    Hey hun what is an ignore button? I have never heard of that before, how does it work?

    Reply
  157. too curious said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:43 am

    I’m putting this here since there isn’t a really new Brangie thread:

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2009/06/07/brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-to-finally-wed-115875-21420451/

    Isn’t the Mirror the one that had the “private interview” with Brad at the afterparty at Cannes? I need Keane or Topbrit to sort out the British sources for me!

    Reply
  158. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    @Keane:
    Yes, it’s true Keane, I’ve been suffering with your constant and personal barrage of attacks against me for months now!!! Cough, cough (bullshit), cough. As for my trade, I’ve never participated in a public forum before which I’m still getting used to trying to get comfortable with – so with that said, yeah, I’ve never stated online before what I do, but you were correct in your assumptions. You guessed correctly.

    Reply
  159. sheen said on June 8th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, and I understand whats going on here. Just hope that IAN will do something about it. Its become really annoying when certain dialog got interrupted with assults. Like I said, its a pleasure reading here but I hardly can join in coz english is not my first language. You guys are so quick and sharp sometimes I’m having hard time to catch up. I will continue to read though… Btw, best wishes for your surgery.

    Reply
  160. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    Thank you very much for your well wishes, and i would never guess that English isn’t your first language, you do such a terrific job with it. Very happy to have met you btw :-) @sheen:

    Reply
  161. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    @Keane:
    As for gossip, I actually don’t have anything mind blowing to put out there. I have been in firsthand situations where I would be comfortable in saying that Aniston was truly devastated by the shenanigans and outcome of MAMS. I can confirm that firsthanhd, but it’s not through a long heart to heart with her, merely a closeness in proximity. I could suggest that BP and AJ certainly had the strangest ‘platonic’ relationship that I’ve ever seen given some truly deep sexually charged kisses with their bodies such that they could not get any closer in physical proximity without some sort of consummation, this being while not on set, nor filming. I could wonder if Pitt’s relationship with Aniston was more guarded given his prior relationship with GP and the damage and hurt that she did him, and what a certain Mr. V told me about that situation one on one, right after I had first come to Hollywood. All of these things I could confirm, but people on the board have basically already figured out their beliefs about these things and, like I said, it’s not some wild story I have access to that confirms these things that most of you already know.

    Reply
  162. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    @harikari girl:

    Well you know I’m so threatened by people who work in the industry after all, I only like people who don’t! Just to clear that one up once and for all, I love talking to people with contacts in the industry such as Ian, Kate, Section and now you, because I love to hear the goss, that is what I’m here for after all! My only proviso is that I need to be fairly sure they are who they say they are. I don’t want to waste time with people who are clearly here for ulterior motives. So I am VERY excited to hear that we have a genuine industry person here to dish some goss (if you feel so inclined!). I also take my hat off to you for getting some work in that area of the industry. A lot of the people I went to drama school with as a child and who went on to train at the UK’s best drama schools have never really hit great heights. Its mainly theatre work they’ve done on pretty low pay. Getting any part whatsoever in any film is a big achievment. How are you finding the industry these days with the downturn? Has it impacted on work opportunities much yet? I know it has in TV in the UK though things are starting to come through a bit more now.

    Reply
  163. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    Lol Keane, on some sites you have the option to edit your comment ignore another poster, report a comment for valid reasons, etc. It actually gives the poster security. Hopefully if IAN dosen’t have a moderator soon, he will give us the method of self protection…@Keane:

    Reply
  164. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    @harikari girl:

    Any thoughts on whether Brad and Jen will get back together, is Jen into men and were all her relationships since Brad just for PR?

    Reply
  165. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:09 am

    @Patty Anne:

    Oh so if they are being abusive to you you can hit it and you can’t see their posts any more, is that it?

    Reply
  166. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    @Keane:
    No, not yet – SAG is still fighting it out and that’s disruptive, but many of major production companies have made their own deals with the union so that there was disruption in filming. So my schedule for the year really is looking like it will remain the same.

    Reply
  167. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    Yep! :-) That way they can spew all the venom they wish, but you don’t see it…lol Sort of puts them into a position of “talking with one’s self”…@Keane:

    Reply
  168. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:17 am

    @Keane:

    Jen is into men – very much so. I have no idea whether they will get back together or not, I’m not privy to that. Nobody in town knows, Huvane’s in the dark. I would suggest that she has not used the men in her life since just for PR, she has had a genuine interest in the person as well, or has been simply trying, trying to get back out there and date and see what happens. Unfortunately, she has to do it under major public scrutiny, so that makes it tough. As I said, I don’t believe she goes out with a man to use him, but she has used the side benefit of being involved with someone at a particular time to be able to be seen as a woman with a man by her side as opposed to the “unlucky in love, still whining” image that AJ’s camp has been very comfortable with continuing to encourage the tabs to reinforce that image..

    Reply
  169. sheen said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:23 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Thank you Patty Anne. English language is widely spoken here in my country Malaysia. I’m having hard time expressing myself through writing. It’s midnight here and I will say goodnight to you and all.

    Reply
  170. mia said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    @Patty Anne:

    So you enjoy intelligent dialgue on such thought provoking but highly speculative – because of the lack of proof- topics such as rape, child molestation, incest, bestiality, drug deals and relationships with the president? Great. You have me impressed.

    Reply
  171. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    I hope it is proper for me to respond to your post since it wasn’t directed at me, i did get told off about that once by…oh forget it…lol. I want to tell you i am so very happy that you were able to validate Jennifer’s preference sexually. I had the impression she is very much into men and very aware of her sexuality which is a wonderful thing, to feel sexy about ones self (wink!) Seems there are so many Jolie untruth’s out there about Jennifer that one needs to comb through the pile for her true self. I was checking out a site yesterday about celebs and the charities she supports : Jennifer Aniston has supported the following charities:

    •Clothes Off Our Back
    •EB Medical Research Foundation
    •Friends of El Faro
    •GLAAD
    •Habitat For Humanity
    •Lili Claire Foundation
    •Luke Neuhedel Foundation
    •Project A.L.S.
    •Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network
    •St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
    •US Campaign for Burma
    and it makes me ill to think that Angie has created the false image of Jennifer as a self centerd person who cares not for the woes of others. In fact, when i found that Jennifer while married to Brad hosted a dinner party to introduce Brad to her friend Bono and to inform 20 invited celebrity guests about the need to help the Aids victims in Eythopia in 2004, then Brad gives all the credit for his works in Eythopia for the Aids victims to Angie! Makes me all the more angry with Brads encouragement of bashing Jennifer in order to increase praise of Angie….@harikari girl:

    Reply
  172. chris said on June 8th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    @harikari girl:
    wow, you are an HW actress, i’m talking to a HW actress, that’s awsome !!! well, since you’re here and you seem to like gossip as much as we do, i’d be curious to know how people in your industry see miss “i’m so better then everyboby that i’m actually farting chanel” aka jolie, if you don’t mind of course.

    Reply
  173. mia said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    So you are still worked up by what happened to poor Jen five years ago? While you couldn`t care less about those millions of other divorces that in most cases had far worse outcomes because it left single mothers and kids hurt and with a significant dcrease of income. You know what Jen said about the gossip speculation of her divorce attracting the lowest of the low and that she doesn`t want THAT kind of supporters? Well I ma pretty sure that would include you and your buddies at IUC. Because I can`t imagine that Jen is half as vindicative as you are!

    Reply
  174. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    Me too Chris! I’d love to hear what people in the industry think of The Brand, only if harikari girl feels she can respond to that question of course@chris:

    Reply
  175. mia said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    So Jolie created that image of Jen? Sorry to inform you but it was Jen herself who created her image post divorce through her ill advised Vanity Fair interview (remember pitty parites that she throws herself, screaming at the ocean and crying at a time she was already dating Vince Vaughn) , her many revealing shots in far too small bikinis in Mexico and her many playboy boyfirends – the worst being John Mayer who seemed to have loved the media attention much more than he ever loved Jen. By the way Jen did also mentiion in an interview that charity is not for her. Probably in an effort to distance herself from Jolie. Well that one backfired.

    Reply
  176. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    IMO, it’s just more Jolie PR…you notice the article says Jolie will CONSIDER marrying, yadda, yadda, yadda. It doesn’t state that the WILL marry, or that she WILL marry….just more smoke hun@too curious:

    Reply
  177. mia said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Please stop being so paranoid! Why would you assume that every tabloid story is written by Jolie? As if she ever wrote one in the first place. This is just another made up c.rap article like so many others. Why would you bother one way or another?

    Reply
  178. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @Patty Anne:Dang girl, while I love everything you post, and enjoy your straight-shooter style, I do believe this is perhaps the most inspirational thing I’ve ever read here. There’s hope for all of us, in the love department, and what else really matters. So glad you told us this, PA. (I was getting a little down at all the negative stuff toward each other, I mean we have a common “enemy” it’s the Brange, it’s not each other, am I right? LOL)

    Reply
  179. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    lol AMEN sistah! No more negativity. Choose to ignore such silly stuff. And thank you for your comment. Life is grand! I am very happy, well loved, wonderful family…thanks to God@Knowone:

    Reply
  180. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    @mia:Just as you are backfiring in a big way on this board with your “opinions.” You won’t be liked here. This old-as-dirt argument you’re attempting to frame up again is worn very thin. There’s nothing wrong and it is not “whiny” to yell at the ocean when you’ve been betrayed. It’s about the kindest way to vent possible. That interview is perhaps why this board of like-minded strangers exists. Run along to your own people, now. By Mia, it was nice (not) hearing your opinion. Everyone’s got one.

    Reply
  181. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    I realize there are many like me out there; married for a long time, believing it to be forever, then suddenly the bottom falls out and we find we must leave that behind and move on to a better life for ourselves. At the time it is extremely traumatizing, but during that time, we also grow. We learn that we can depend upon ourselves, supply our own needs, form our own opinions and take charge of our lives, living in a responsible manner. In time we find that middle area in which we are happy, contented, and well cared for by ourselves. Forming large groups of girl friends and some guy friends gives up all the emotional support we need while learning how to live as a single. It becomes fun before we realize it! Soon, we think of our ex as “what’s his name” and realize we no longer feel regret, anger, hurt, nada. It’s behind us, over, and we’ve grown past “it” and “him/her” What FREEDOM to be who and what we are as a person!!! To grow, study, learn, experience, make new friends, meet new people, and do adventurous things ( i did my first sky dive six months after my divorce, and within the first year i bought a motorcycle which i sold six months later…lol)
    The main thing i learned is to trust in yourself, believe in yourself, and never feel you can’t do anything on your own because YOU CAN! And you will enjoy it as well. So you see why i feel i can understand where Jennifer Aniston is coming from? Who needs/wants “What’s His Name” in your life again?…Nahhhhh….on to better things!! I was not looking to fall in love again, remember i had the mind set of a good Catholic school girl when i married …it was for life, or until he got life!…lol. But after a number of wonderful singleness, i met this widowed man who says he told his friend upon the first meeting with me, “That’s going to be my wife”…unfortunately i didn’t feel the same, so it was rather a hectic courtship….he drove over 800 miles every weekend to come visit me at my home in a far away state. The fact that he has relatives who live in my area helped, but he made that effort….twice a mont….for a number of months. He convinced me to give it a try, i relaxed, tentatively trusted again, and…..fell in love with him as well. After nearly a decade of marriage, we are happier every day! We laugh like to nut cases, we love the same foods, television programs, hobbies, etc. He is my reward for a miserable first marriage. And he spoiles me dearly, but then i deserve it…wink!!!
    My wish for all of you is much love, much happiness, and true joy in who you are. You are a unique creation of God, cherrish that thought and know you are as He designed you….glory in yourself…..amen

    Reply
  182. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    @Patty Anne:Wow, that is so cool, that your guy worked so hard to earn his trust, and love. He’s a keeper, just for that Herculean effort. Yes, that old adage “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger” is of course true. (Though, when you’re in the midst of trauma, it is an insulting truth, because you are quite sure that God does through you some stuff you simply can’t survive.) And then slowly, you do survive, and then even more slowly, you perk your ears up and life begins to once again show some humor and grace. Thanks for your humor and grace, Patty Ann. Jennifer Anniston is just a symbol for so many of us, I think. A very public symbol of this struggle to overcome. And in my world, what I and others have had to overcome has been A LOT more than “merely” the betrayal of a spouse you loved and trusted. And I’ve seen such strength and wisdom amongst the survivors in the real world who get no publicity (they don’t won’t it, and would be further traumatized by it), often get kicked in the teeth more with people’s “assumptions” of their very private lives and the only validation they get is in the telling of their story to a kind and compassionate person with listening ears that do not judge. So, I do think these “public figures” and their “tiny” problems serve a purpose to pick a team and gripe about how our team member must carry on the good and public fight. Team Anniston here. LOL and big hugs to you and your very worthy partner.

    Reply
  183. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    What a wonderful uplifting post Patty Anne! I know how you feel. I am on husband #3! And he is the best – we have been together 19 years and married 17! :D

    Reply
  184. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @harikari girl:

    I confess I am also interested to hear how AJ is thought of amongst her peers. The word I have used bandied around most – although this is by Brit industry people, not HW types necessarily – is “difficult”. And I think that’s usually a polite way of saying something much worse in general! My guess would be is that a lot of people strongly resent her self-appointed Queenship of HW and perhaps know of her reputation as someone to work with, others see her as a highly bankable, money-spinning star who would be an asset to their film. I suspect however most of these people, both those for and against, probably think of her as a bit of a “womam of ill repute”?! Although perhaps HW is a far more licentious society? BTW I met a HW actress once at Ladies Day at Ascot about 5 years ago I think it was, she was modelling a hat for the awaiting paps to promote the work of a designer friend, I forget his name. She had long red hair if I remember rightly, but I can’t remember her name at all and didn’t recognise it at the time. It wasn’t you was it?! If not, can anyone think who it might have been? Apparently she was a relatively famous HW actress but I personally had never heard of her!

    Reply
  185. I'm on the bidet said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    Wow, I’m feeling left out – how come nobody thinks I am Ian?

    Reply
  186. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    That can be solved my friend, all you need to do is pick another username beginning with K (I’m pretty sure the letter K is crucial to this conspiracy theory), defend Ian when he is attacked and wish him well when he has a book coming out. That should do the trick, you will be being accused of being Ian in a jiffy!

    Reply
  187. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    Because he doesnt use a bidet! Laughing myself right off of my chair (not a bidet) at work! But if you want, Ms. Bidet, I will start calling you Ian-Bidet! :P

    Reply
  188. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    @Keane:
    Good answer Keane – that never occured to me! :D

    Reply
  189. chris said on June 8th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    @Keane:
    not necesseraly, there were posters on ff saying that the most agressives people attacking you were in fact ian who wanted you out of the blog. don’t shoot me, i just found those theories hilarious. abviously because i’m not targeted.

    Reply
  190. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @chris:Keep your head low in a shit storm. That’s my best advice. (Those FF’ers have dome interesting theories, but they can be some mean biiches). lol

    Reply
  191. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Speaking of shit storms, where’s Mama? She’s good in these duels. ha.

    Reply
  192. chris said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @Knowone:
    i went there when patty ann posted the link, otherwise i don’t go there, and i thought it was so ridiculous that it became hilarious. and i don’t understand your first sentence. well literaly i do but the meaning, not so much…

    Reply
  193. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    @chris:

    No that’s ok I’m interested to hear what is being said and by whom but I don’t intend to go there and read it myself, life is too short for that! If Ian wants me to stop posting he only has to say the word and I will happily bow out, he knows that. He is a straightforward guy and I am a straightforwad girl, I would not take it to heart at all. But yes I think the proliferation of conspiracy theories over there tells you all you need to know about that site, they will literally offer up any theory on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. Someone came here to say that not only had it been “outed” on another site that I was Ian, it had also been “verified” – verified I tell you, how in God’s name did they manage to do that!!!! Just goes to show what some people will take for evidence, and they critiicse us for believing what Ian writes when he is putting his name to it and has signed release forms from all his sources! Whatever, there really is no reasoning with people like that. But it is an eyeopener as to how much people can misinterpret you and other people. Someone said I enjoyed my bitch reputation and loved the fact that people were talking about me on other sites when the reality couldn’t be anything further from the truth, but if people are going to do it I’d much rather laugh it off than make a big deal out of it. How does any of this really matter in the real world after all? And yes the fact that someone thought Kate was on Ian’s payroll was also hilarious, she runs her own consultancy business, her husband works for one of the studios, I don’t think she needs Ian to throw her a few cents for a bit of positive commentary! I just find it funny how people form opinions on people/things withoout actually knowing very much about it. If people would nly put those questions to us and ask outright then maybe we could clear it up. But just bitching about it on other sites is just insane. But yeah do fill me in on whatever bonkers theory is being perpetuated now. It is nothing if not amusing!

    Reply
  194. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @chris:Just seems like Ian keeps his head low, in a general way. Throws stuff out there for us to discuss, and allows freedom of the group speak to prevail. I get it, I admire it, but it is sometimes confusing, and often downright nasty, this lack of moderation. But I think it all kinda goes along with Ian’s free speech/truth agenda. Maybe I’m reading too much into it? What do you think?

    Reply
  195. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    @Keane:
    Could it be Julianne Moore?

    Reply
  196. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    @chris:

    That is funny though, you really can’t win can you? I either am Ian, being paid by Ian or Ian is out to get me when the reality is I am nothing whatseover to do with Ian and never have been, I just like his blog! I guess sometimes the truth is not as interesting as the fiction so people believe what they want to believe.

    Reply
  197. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Hey gang, I watched CCOBB (yes, I’m not exactly cutting edge current) yesterday. I liked it, a lot. I’ll even go out there and say I preferred this film to Slumdog Millionnaire. Did anyone else like this 3-HOUR relationship film? (I had read the F. Scott Fitzgerald short story and was afraid that it would have been bastardized (basterdized?) by Stupitt, but I liked it. (And yes, I’m a bit ashamed for paying money to see it, b/c I am a Brand boycotter….and a hippocrit for art, apparently. ha. (too lazy to correct typos today.)

    Reply
  198. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @Caribsmom:

    Oh no I would have definitely have known her, she is mega famous. She was much younger than Moore, probably mid- late 20’s (5-6 years ago) and she had long strawberry blonde hair if I remember right. She wasn’t anything particularly out of the ordinary to look at, quite normal looking really. Maybe her career never really took off! How about Amy Adams is she a redhead? To be fair I could just look up her pic and find out, maybe I will a bit later on!

    Reply
  199. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Erm, well, this morning I went to FF to see what PA was talking about and read some of their comments on IUC Difficulty. Saw Kate’s post…but when I tried to go in just now, all the threads have been deleted…hmmmmmmmm

    Reply
  200. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Oops, meant to say IUC Hostility. I did a search and the links came up but when I clicked on them it says the URL found 0 results!! They have obviously been removed. Not a big deal, just a curiosity

    Reply
  201. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @Knowone:

    I’ve not seen it but I did catch the trailer yesterday and I also thought that it looked like a reasonably good film. And Brad seemed quite convincing in it. I genuinely think Brandgelina overshadowed that film and people were so sick of them that they didn’t want to see him in a film. When someone is on the cover of a magazine every week and you know everything there is to know about their personal lives I don’t think anyone really wants to go and see you act in something. Why do you need to when the whole of their lives is being played out in front of the cameras anyway. People were just more interested in them than in their films. Which is why I think Brandgelina has actually done him more harm than good. He had a successful movie career based on his performances and star quality before he met her. He is now more known for being a tabloid favourite. She has done well out of it in terms of money-making and positioning, I don’t think her career ever really hit the heights of Brad’s before that, but it hasn’t helped the B.O. of her films I don’t think. They’ve definitely gone for overkill and while this has benefitted them in terms of finances, I think it has made their acting careers suffer greatly.

    Reply
  202. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @Caribsmom:Gurl, you have to learn how to moderate yourself. LOL I think they’ve got a real mixed bag over there….they still attract a lot of loons and I think they’ve developed a very, very tough exterior…perhaps to the point of being a little (or ok, maybe a lot) defensive about anyone who ain’t them who speculates about the U.S. Royalty that is known lovingly as The Brangelina.

    Reply
  203. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @Caribsmom:

    That’s interesting. I wonder if someone requested they take their comments down or whether it was a moderator on the blog. Maybe even Ian asked them to do it who knows? What did Kate’s post say?

    Reply
  204. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @Keane:I think you’re exactly right. I myself did not want to see anything that couple (eyeroll) was out there promoting b/c I hate that couple. I was so very glad that that film did not win anything, which is a real shame to all the artists and technicans who made a very good movie. Why doesn’t this phenom have any affect on the dumb asses who are in this ridiculous partnership? I think this continuing charade will erode them both, and that’s why I like to pull up a chair to the continuing show being the scenes as it were. Cause it’s a lot more interesting than what they are throwing out to the masses…..and they keep throwing it (Time magazine, Forbes shame on them both).

    Reply
  205. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    No, i haven’t seen CCBB, but if it weren’t for it including one of The Brand i might have. I”m too burned out with the Brand, so much oversaturation lately. I kept thinking back to Troy, (laughter here at Brad in Troy), and Alexander (bigger laugh here at Angie as Colin Farrell’s horny mother) that i just don’t want to see either of their faces for a number of years to give my eyeballs a chance to heal from the horror….lol@Knowone:

    Reply
  206. chris said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    @Knowone:
    i don’t overthink to much about all this, i think he post when he has a scoop, and we can’t ask him to have one everyday, you know gossip as well as i do, there can be months before any news comes out about a star. well about them it comes a lot more often but they are an exception
    @Keane:
    that’s exactly my point, i know it’s easy for me to say so because i’m not the one concerned, but at some point, you can’t take all this personally because they don’t know you, they just have an image of what they think you are, but we only show a little part of ourselves on blogs, so the best thing to do is see it as i do when i read staff like this, i don’t take it seriously, that’s why i laugh a lot knowing that the persons who lose all their time imaging those conspiracy theories are serious. it’s just ridiculous. in my opinion. it’s gossip it’s not a life and death matter so i really don’t understand why people react like if what was said on jolie or aniston or pitt was insulting their mother.

    Reply
  207. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    Supposedly QT approached Brad and had to bend his arm so to say, to take the role in IB. Now i am wondering why? When neither Brad nor Angie’s recent films have been hits , rather they have been box office bombs….who is paying for the losses? Is Brad using Plan B funds to partially finance these? Something isn’t right here. I would no more pay thousands of dollars to buy a dead race horse than backers would throw away money financing known losers….what gives?

    Reply
  208. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    @Patty Anne:Maybe it’s a personal thing for QT. He has a weakness for the underdog….brought back John Travolta’s career and even David Carridine’s (RIP), soooooo, maybe in QT’s mind, Brad was the underdog. Not really, in my book, but maybe in his. Dunno, it could be a money thing, for sure.

    Reply
  209. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    I was reading up on Moneyball, seems it’s a comedy. They are changing the facts to suit Brad though. His character is a married man, they are making him single in the film so they can have interaction between him and the female co-star….hummm, isn’t this how something else came about?….lol

    Reply
  210. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    When is Angie due to begin filming the Kay Scarpetta series?

    Reply
  211. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Don’t know about the film schedules of these two numb nuts. I am one of the huge group of people who are incensed by Holie even being considered to play Kay Scarpetta. WFT is that?! Outrage. LOL (that’s why I remain a loyal book reader…..)

    Reply
  212. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    I know how you feel. I’ve been reading the series for ages, and now, thanks to Holie, i will never buy another Kay Scarpetta Medical Examiner book again… :-( @Knowone:

    Reply
  213. Kim on the bidet said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @Keane:
    Okay, I’ve added a K to start my name, hope no one confuses for some other Kim though . . . does Kim Jong-il use a bidet?

    Reply
  214. SZ said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @harikarigirl: I’m only posting because I found your comments about me very strange. You specified the exact street where the school is in your neighborhood in the hills. I know that street — I drive it often. I’m one canyon over from you. I don’t “get” what you found “uncomfortable.” That’s your opinion, but you actually named the neighborhood for anyone who knows the H Hills.

    @Patty Anne: I was not posting at IUC at the same time I began posting @ FF. Beyond that, I’m done.

    Reply
  215. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @SZ:

    Well the “paranoid monster” Keane sends her love SZ, as no doubt does the “muckraker” Ian! God knows why you would ever have posted here if you thought that about him anyway. And was it you who said Kate and I were also the same person too? Oh yes and I of course never went to Oxford. Have fun trying to trash me, Ian and whoever else as well as you can somewhere else. I was always respectful towards you, if never convinced you were who you said you were. If you are a real person then your behaviour has been beyond peculiar. Good luck with your life.

    Reply
  216. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    Easy girl, they are only coming here to rile us again because as Caribsmom said, she can’t post on FF ’s IU Hostility …somehow they lost the thread. Peace g/f. They aren’t worth your breath, and they are only here for the fight….@Keane:

    Reply
  217. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    I wonder if Brad is heading for LA now? I had read where he was to begin filming Moneyball mid June, and it’s coming fast….i’m surprised no word in the paps either…i was just at the supermarket, and nada. Isn’t Angie finished now? Supposedly she said she was taking the kiddos to France for the summer while Brad filmed in LA, then she says she’s taking the kids to LA to be with Brad while he films. I think she needs to make up her mind, those poor kids have no idea what their home address is!!

    Reply
  218. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    Could very well be. I know i was highly impressed with DC’s performance in Kill Bill ….and i have always believed John Travolta to be an excellent actor. But then i’m biased. He lives in a “fly-in” development not that far from me, and occasions a local coffee shop in the wee hours of the morning. Very nice gentleman. So sorry about his son Jett. From what i’ve heard locally, he and Kelly are still totally devistated with the loss of their son. I feel so badly for them@Knowone:

    Reply
  219. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Hm I don’t know with SZ, the behaviour is just beyond odd and has been from word go. I always said I didn’t believe she was who she said she was, that everything she said was far too slippery, but I never said I could say that with absolute certainty. The fact that she’s gone to another site posted under the same name and is still reading here and came back here to post abotu herself makes her seem more likely to be real rather than a plant. I don’t know, I have found everything she has done and said very odd and then to try to trash me and Ian both here and on other sites made me think it even more, but who knows? If this is a real person, her psychology is baffling me! I don’t know, I can’t see what point there would be for her to come back again. Who the hell knows at this stage! Let’s just let it slide.

    Reply
  220. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    @Knowone:
    I only went there because of what Patty Anne and then Kate said, out of curiosity. But like I said when I tried to go back to read Kates post again the whole thread was removed. Not a big deal, just curious. I really just wanted to see which posters Kate was talking about who were regulars here, apparently they hurt her feelings by talking bad things about her behind her back over there. Enough so that she has now pulled herself out of here for awhile, think she is really bummed out and not having fun anymore.

    Reply
  221. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    It really dosen’t matter who she is or isn’t at this point imo, it’s clear to me that since they can not pull up the Topic on FF ” IU Hostility ” they have no where left to go but here to continue to bash us and IAN. I choose to ignore any comments they make here, and it’s only thanks to Caribsmom that i know they lost the thread, i certainly didn’t go there looking for it…. We aren’t here for the fights….we are here for the discussions, and laughs and friendship….. Let those who come here with hidden adjendas look elsewhere…. :-) I’m sure as they are bored out of their minds with their favorite thread down, more will be popping up here….just use your MENTAL IGNORE button as Kate suggested…i certainly will be!

    Reply
  222. benjaminbutton14 said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @harikari girl:
    bb14. Exactly I’m of the same. I have only been reading the birthday blog and have had no idea what was going on on the space post. I was shocked. Ian should do something about this, we don’t want to lose any posters. Why hasn’t come forward and helped us out with this.

    Reply
  223. jan said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    evening all. just got back from the shop and i want to say i enjoy the comments except the really insulting and name calling ones. it is funny that the jolie fans will attack you for being insulting to them if you post ageneral comment to them but it is ok for thnem to insult and call a woman barren. i am sorry but that is one insult to woman i cannot stomach as their are many woman that would love to have a child but cannot. i think the best is to make light of these insults and try to ignore them i know it is hard and we some times fail to ignore but please try they spoil the good disscussions that i love to read.
    shit let me make a paragraph or some one will comment on my writing and i will put full stops now and again. as for peewee i have never watched his films as i find him a very one demenial actor and i never liked blondes. now depp is one hot tamalie and keeps me entertained for the whole movie i don’t even crave a smoke. i hope they get married as they deserve each other and jen a new start and man in her life. jmo night all excuse the spelling it is 10.40pm in south africa now

    Reply
  224. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Then after reading your post Caribsmom, i must apologize for mistaking you for a FF fighter. I am truly sorry for that mistake….forgive?@Caribsmom:

    Reply
  225. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Oh, I didn’t even know you had dissed me! LOL I’ve been a loyal poster here for months you know that! hahahaha

    Reply
  226. benjaminbutton14 said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    bb14. This is news from Down Under so it could be old. I read that while Brad was in LA collecting that thing for Fight Club, he received a text from Jen about meeting for lunch. He said it was a great idea, but minutes later he received a call from Ange telling him to get his butt back to New York, now whether he went or not it never said. Now apparently Ange is not going to France she is staying in LA to keep an eye on Brad and Jen. Apparent;ly the story goes that Ange walked in on a conversation Brad was having with Jen when Ange busted in and heard what he was saying to Jen, something along the lines of “It;s ok Jen it will work out.” Ange still believes that Brad is in love with Jen and never really got over her. And more to the story that Jen could try and get Brad back the same way that Ange stole Brad from Jen. Ange told him that he has to stop being in contact with Jen if they want their relationship to work, but Brad is adamant that he will not give up Jen. He now realizes that it was a lot of fun being with Jen than it is being with Jolie, even tho he loves the kids. So while Ange is still finishing Salt he and Jen still have plenty of time to catch up and even when Ange is in town. Ange and Brad still are not living together they are living separate lives so apparently he will have time to be with Jen. Again sorry if this is old but we are talking Australia here.

    Reply
  227. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    True, and i’m so sorry i doubted you, i had saved the page containing the thread from FF and reread it, you aren’t listed there either as Tamara or Caribsmom….again i apologize@Caribsmom:

    Reply
  228. benjaminbutton14 said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. That is a good idea Patty Anne, we definately need one of them. Please, we don’t want to lose any posters I love this blog and all of you people it is like one huge family all uniting it’s the best.
    I think it is time Ian did do something as some of these posters who come here and cause trouble need to be blocked out.

    Reply
  229. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    I’ve read that also. After than i believe, Brad flew to Long Island for a few hours the day before Angie’s 34th birthday, then left that evening to fly on to UK. I have no idea where he is now, but his movie Moneyball is supposed to begin filming around mid June…@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  230. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    LOL No probs, no I’ve never posted there, but its funny how they are still talking conspiracy because one time when Kate hit reply her name appeared as Katecaribsmom, or something like that and everyone just went apes^^t saying it proves that Kate isn’t who she says she is, that she’s working for Ian, etc etc. hahahahaha! That is just crazy!!

    Reply
  231. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    HI BB14 – even if it is “old” – you have a snappy way of encapsulating a long entry into an easy read! So keep it up, as it keeps me up to date as I am usually behind all the latest gossip about the dastardly duo anyway! :P

    Reply
  232. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    Well benjamine, i didn’t know if it was proper for such a newbie as me to do, but i felt in all fairness IAN needed to know from a poster here what was occuring. It’s true that such fighting can ruin a blog, and i know that i wouldn’t want to be on one where all there was was to bash other posters, and other blog sites. That to me is an empty existance…all potatos and no meat…. I decided not to respond to the FF Fighters any more either. IT TAKES 2 TO HAVE A FIGHT….and if one refuses to be engaged….it’s done! Nothing but a nut case yakking to themselves….just use your MENTAL IGNORE button!! We’ve been told the thread is down now on FF, which in my opinion is a good thing. Perhaps now we can all, those on FF and those of us here, can blog in peace about our take on events that concern us. We all have the right to an opinion, but we all do NOT have the right to bully, insult, and name call others with whom we disagree!!@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  233. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:

    Yeah that’s just PR BS I would say. I think Ange checked out of the relationship ages ago – and whether she was ever really in it for real in the first place is highly debatable to me. I only think she cares about the PR backlash against her and how it might threaten her celebrity sovereignty. I think she wanted to keep up the Brangelina charade for longer, hence the adoption attempts to try to keep Brad sucked in. But it sounds to me like she’s had a wandering eye for a long time. The way she was said to be gazing adoringly at Daniel Day-Lewis at the SAG Awards when she was pictured looking supposedly pregnant with the twins and smugly in love with Brad for the benefit of the photographers. I get the impression that once she’s got what she wanted out of someone she gets bored and needs a new thrill so goes looking for her next victim. Someone so in love with herself can never properly be in love with someone else I don’t think. I think her men are just stepping stones to try to achieve world domiantion. Its that Hitleresque plan again. Its scary but fascinating to watch. But she doesn’t seem to realise that one day her scheming will all be exposed. People aren’t as gullible as she seems to think. The truth about people always comes out in the end.

    Reply
  234. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Lol…it got way worse than that….i was told i am Keane!! I wonder what my mother would say to that?@Caribsmom:

    Reply
  235. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Something that struck me from the Ann Curry Brad Pitt interview in Cannes was when she asked him what he had planned next, he said something to the effect that he didnt really have anything, and I thought what about that mile long list on IMDB, 13 items in Development and then all these:

    Actor:
    In Production
    2000s
    1990s
    1980s
    The Odyssey (2012) (announced) (rumored)
    The Sparrow (2010) (announced) (rumored)
    Moneyball (2011) (pre-production) …. Billy Beane
    The Lost City of Z (2010) (pre-production) …. Col. Percy Fawcett
    The Tree of Life (2010) (post-production)

    Reply
  236. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    And don’t forget Angie’s Kay Scarpetta SERIES….seems to me they are wanting to gather a ton of money in a short time to be so over scheduled…what’s with that i wonder? Angie wanting to buy the world??@Caribsmom:

    Reply
  237. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @Keane:
    She probably thought that with BP they would have an open relationship, and I think for awhile that probably worked out all right, but it seems to have gone pear shaped now.

    Reply
  238. Caribsmom said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Oh! Is BP involved in that as well? I thought that was Angies gig???

    Reply
  239. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Ah, you’re one step closer to gaining “you are Ian” status my friend, if you’re being accused of being me then you’re almost there! I find it bewlidering that these people can’t seem to grasp the very basic fact that we are all actually just friends and are supportive and kind to each other because we LIKE each other. Is that really so difficult to understand? Do these people not have actual friendships or form them with others easily? Very weird, and in terms of gaining an insight into the psyche of people you may not encounter much in real life, highly interesting!

    Reply
  240. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Sounds a bit like they’re trying to go for broke to make as much cash as possible before their shelf life as actors runs out. Angelina only has about 6 years to go before she incurs the fate of actresses like Nicole Kidman. If you make a career on the basis of your looks you lose it the moment they start to fade somewhat. As for Brad well men tend to fare much better in the HW game but again his career was largely preidcated on his looks, maybe he thinks he may incur the same fate. Or maybe they are in competition with each other to establish the better career after the split and turn out the more successful star. I get the impression that they both think that if one of them succeeds the other will necessarily fail, like the town ain’t big enough for the both of them or whatever. I don’t know, if I were them I’d be sitting pretty in one of my many houses, counting all my cash, hanging out with family and friends and travelling the world, not making more pointless films! But I guess people who make it to the top in HW are motivated by very different things to you and me!

    Reply
  241. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Actually i don’t think Brad could continue as A-Lister after a few more years. His ride to A-Lister is on Pretty BOY looks, which have gone south with Jolie’s va-ja-ja. As we age, our noses get wider, larger over all, muscle tone gives out, and plastic surgery is so fake looking, especially on someone trying to remain a Pretty Boy past his prime. Brad better forget the acting roles, and concentrate on producing…..As for Jolie, i see her giving up the ghost very soon. The close up stills of her on SALT show a very OLD looking woman who bears a slight resemblance to Angie Jolie…she’s aged 20 years in just four with Pitt. Amazing when you thing about it…..Good triumphs over evil…..compare side by side recent photos of Jennifer Aniston who has also been working her gorgeous azz off, beside Brad Pitt and beside Angelina Jolie….no comparrison lass=”replyTo” href=”#comment-32220″>@Keane:

    Reply
  242. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Keane:
    Hi Keane – back to psychoanalyzing the dastardly duo – sometimes I wonder if they have such low opinions of themselves that the evil Ms. Jolie and hapless Mr. Pitt in their heart of hearts think they might will somehow “cease to exist” if they are not constantly on public display either through their relationship antics or their movies – it seems like neither one is ever going to be able to “fade into the sunset” so to speak – perhaps their entire sense of self worth is so tied up in the public image that they present to each other, to us and even to themselves that they are actually scared that if they are not frantically fighting, travelling, or filing, that they will be so overshadowed by someone else, that they will cease to exist somehow.

    Reply
  243. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Oops – fat finger typo again – “filing” is suppose to be “filming”

    Reply
  244. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Hi Patty Anne – I think you are right and I think that evil Ms. Jolie and hapless Mr. Pitt have lived the past 4 years so frantically, so crazily (as in drugs, alcohol, sex) that they have really lived like 10 or 15 years worth in just four – their bodies cant keep up with their wild sides and they both look used up – him especially. Whereas the sweet Ms. Jen seems relaxed and coping with life on an even keel and is aging beautifully even though she is older than the Dark Queen, sweet Jen looks way younger in my opinion. :P

    Reply
  245. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    Ladybert, you may be on to something there. Neither of them had the notiriety (sp) they got when they formed The Brand. The kids bio and adopted garnered more publicity, money, fame in their eyes. Maybe they are afraid that it will all go away if they aren’t “in the public eye any more”?

    Reply
  246. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I have only seen one hapless Mr. Pitt movie – that was “Spygame” with gorgeous Robert Redford – and I liked both of them in that movie. Hapless actually did some acting (in my opinion) and was a likeable character in the movie – it was not that much of an action thriller – had an interesting plot and both had interesting characters.

    Reply
  247. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yes well I have my own opinion on why AJ looks as bad for her age as she does and it is the same for me as that which has wreaked havoc on the face of Fergie from the Black Eyed Peas. Probably having too much work done hasn’t helped the cause either, I think if you f*ck around with your face and body too much it starts to fall apart, there’s too much skin for the bone structure, bones weaken and so on. But yeah, I think she does know this which is why she is so keen to foster the new image of Angelina Jolie, serious politician and humanitarian. It will be interesting to see how she ages though and whether people will still care once the looks are past their sell-by-date. My thinking is probably not. I think when women have long been seen as sex symbols and lose that allure, society is much less kind to them. Look at the change in perception with Madonna after all. She is a bit of a laughing stock these days IMO. Not the outrageous sex symbol she was for most of her career. She should have quit while she was ahead IMO and remained an icon. Her recent years have wiped out her star power from the previous ones to me. And this stuff with Jesus Luz and the adpotions is just desperate. Do these people not care about anything but fame and their career?

    Reply
  248. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Yeah I think you’re exactly right there and the very desperate-seeming actions of Madonna in recent years make her another prime candidate. Its like there is not enough in their personal lives to compensate for giving up their career. Such a sad way to live. All that money and still not happy!

    Reply
  249. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    To me, she especially seems frantic – adopting more and more kids (like shiny new toys) and more and more desperation seems to be seeping out of her. If I did not dislike her and and her antics so very much I would almost feel sorry for her – she is aging fast (I still think she was older than she claims in those teenage pictures) and I think she is actually older than what she says – she feels it is all slipping away. That is why she is always getting “new” notoriarty by her claims to wanting yet another child – she is not just trying to keep the ball and chain on hapless but on the public as well. I think she totally defines herself in how others see her – if others (the public, studios, lovers) start to ignore it, she feels like she is being erased out of existence. All goes back to her strange childhood and lack of any real identify other than as a “sex object” and “sex predator.” Just my opinion of course.

    Reply
  250. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @Keane:
    Madonna is another strange one to me. To me, she looks absolutely ridiculous in those sexed up costumes she wears and her sexual antics. What in the world do her children think of her? I think her children must be frightfully embarrassed at their mother and how she behaves – dang, when I was a teenage back in prehistory, I was embarrassed by my parents just for being around (aren’t most teenagers?) and believe me there is absolutely no comparison to them and Madonna’s antics. Her children are going to be just as interesting to watch develop as the Brangie bunch – entertaining for us observers and extremely sad for them. (Must be feeling philosophical today – wonder what sign the moon is in – laughing at myself of course.) :P

    Reply
  251. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Or, manic more likely. Manic/Depressive disease is only next to schizophrena in seriousness for mental illness. IMO, with Jonathan Voight announcing to the world when Angie was adoptping Maddox that she was seriously mentally ill and needed help, and other comments when researching her bio over the years , in which several state she had “mental issues beginning as early as childhood”….my guess is she’s Bi-Polar (aka Manic Depressive) It can be controlled with meds, but with all the other self medicating Angie does it would be extremely dangerous for her to take them. I really don’t know for fact, but that would be my best guess. When they are on the Manic trip, they own the world, no one is as smart, they can do whatever they wish, their sexual appetite is enourmous….then the depression hits. From those pt.’s i’ve seen , this depression is like no other. It’s the deepest, darkest, most empty hole in the world, and it’s this phase that many attempt suicide. Does it fit? I’m wondering…..

    Reply
  252. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Dang, Patty Anne – once again, you seem to have struck gold with your analysis! I agree with you.

    Reply
  253. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Hm I’m not sure about her age, the fact that she was born to a HW star would make it pretty hard to fake but who knows with her! But yes I think your assessment is spot on there, and as usual LOL at the “trying to keep the ball and chain on hapless” part! I will never be able to think of him in any other way since you dubbed him that!

    Reply
  254. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Ha ha, when you were a teenager “back in prehistory”, you do make me laugh! And yeah Madge is a sight to behold nowadays, but I do think of the two (her and Ange) she is the better parent. I don’t think she sees her kids that much either (according to the chef or the bodyguard or whoever it was who blabbed), but when she does I think she is at least a responsible parent, and strict as well by all accounts. Her children seem much happier than the Brange clan and I think they won’t turn out that bad in the end.

    Reply
  255. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @SZ:

    SZ said on June 8th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
    ’m only posting because I found your comments about me very strange. You specified the exact street where the school is in your neighborhood in the hills. I know that street — I drive it often. I’m one canyon over from you. I don’t “get” what you found “uncomfortable.” That’s your opinion, but you actually named the neighborhood for anyone who knows the H Hills.

    Just to set the record straight:

    I don’t live on Wonderland. In fact, I don’t live off of Laurel Canyon. Personally, I wouldn’t want to – having Laurel Canyon as one’s main access is a pain in the ass. Since you know the area so well, I’m sure you’re well aware of the traffic congestion that plagues Laurel so often. As for Wonderland, I find it to be an exceptionally dark street, in more ways than one, and living there just wouldn’t work for me.

    I guess we’ll just have to agree to find each other’s posts strange and leave it at that. Because I find it rather strange that a knowledgeable Los Angeleno would immediately jump to the conclusion that because I happened to be at Wonderland Elementary school one morning that I obviously must live there and have given my address away on the internet. Actually, not only does it make me sound strange, but it also makes me sound like a moron – because only a moron would hand out their address over the world wide web, or internet – whichever term you prefer.

    Now that we’ve cleared that up, what I find exceptionally strange is that you, a bona fide Los Angeleno and hillside resident would jump to the conclusion that because I happened to be at an elementary school one morning, that that automatically means

    Reply
  256. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    @Keane:
    I do agree with you – that bwteen the two, evil Ms. Jolie and strange Madonna, the “stranger in a strange land” Madonna is the better of the two as a parent. From what I have read, stranger goes to the other extreme in controlling her children probably compensating somehow for her wild antics she is trying to “tie the noose” around those little caboose-kids she has – but boy is that gonna backfire when those cabooses are on their own! But, hey, she is trying at least to be a parent whereas Dark Queen seems to abstain totally in that position! :P

    Reply
  257. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    @SZ:
    Please excuse the typo. So sorry to do a double repeat.

    Reply
  258. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    I think Madonna’s children Lourdes and (fill in the blank)…ok, so i’m getting old!…lol either way, she has insulated her kids from reality. They aren’t allowed to watch television, read magazines….just school books and books Madge writes. She’s a real control freak with her two, however, one day those kids will fall into shock when they see one of Mummie’s videos…”Like A Virgin” etc….she should have eased them into what her world is actually like….I can’t imagie what they will say when they see some of her vulgar outfits…those gold breast cones, the chain up her twat…ewwww AND the worst imo….hanging on the cross….

    Reply
  259. benjaminbutton14 said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @Knowone:
    bb14. I also saw CCBB I thought it was a great film even tho BP was in it. I have to say he did a great job and as for our Cate she was brilliant she didn’t even get a mention at the Oscars, I thought that ccbb should have got best picture I didn’t think Slumdog Millionaire was that great. I honestly think and I regret that I’m saying this that if Brad didn’t win an oscar for his performance in ccbb he won’t ever get one. JMO

    Reply
  260. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @Caribsmom:Because of FF, Kate has left the building????!!!! NO, I say. Come back, Kate. Sorry to hear that. Don’t really know what’s gone down over there, but I have/do read everything here, and it doesn’t seem to me like the sky has fallen. Have I missed some critical piece of information here?

    Reply
  261. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Again, we agree! My money says that they are going to be so repulsed and embarrassed by their “mother” they will either try to outdo her, or will try to escape from her (and escape into what, whom, and where defy my imagination) and the ridicule of public opinion about her or both. In any case, I do not see them turning out well at all.

    Reply
  262. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Yes, i feel that too. Lourdes is a young woman now, and as such she is beginning to see her mother for what she is..a hypocrite! The very things that Madonna used to gain her fame and money are the things she shields her children from seeing….to me that indicates embarrassment over what she’s done….how to explain that to the kiddies? Lourdes is Madonna all over…if she also bleaches her hair, no one would be able to tell them apart when she is grown. The little boy looks just like his dad. It’s a shame he didn’t get custody. Now my opinion of Angie’s kids….Oh My! Maddox will be a terror….Pax is going to be into trouble big time as he has no idea who or what he is…..Zahara has RAD they say, so she will need special care……Shiloh has been so battered, beatten and ignored, she will most likely act out like Angie has ( Z, i’m hearing, has beatten Shiloh from birth on, left many bruises, etc.)…the twins….they will just copy whoever they adhear to in the tribe. Either way, none of these privledged kids will be the better off for their status, but will in the end, suffer more for it…..None of them have ever had what we’d call a normal life….no permanent home …..no permanent people in their lives actually…..nannies, bodyguards, servants, etc…..what a pathetic shame

    Reply
  263. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Dang, Z has beaten Shiloh? Is that part of the RAD or somet hing else? Its almost like its own little disease – the Brangie brood needs its own DSM number! And then they will all breed and have kids and pass on what they see as “normal” to their kids and on and on and on it goes and where it stops, no body knows!

    Reply
  264. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    Hello Jan. I just scrolled and found your earlier post. Welcome to the blog! I agree that Brad and Angie are a waste of humanity, and so phony as well….looking forward to more posts from you@jan:

    Reply
  265. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @Keane:
    I agree that aging is probably something that AJ will really struggle with. And partly, I can’t blame her — any woman on this board knows society holds a double standard when it comes to woman aging vs a man aging. And I think that’s really sad. But I only said I ‘partly’ can’t blame her because on the other hand when you do choose to set yourself up as a sex symbol and vie for most beautiful in the world, you unwittingly deliver yourself straight into the hands of ageism (which as I already said society is all too willing to do to women without them being complicit). You know who I find beautiful and sexy? Helen Mirren. There’s a woman of a certain age who hasn’t butchered her face with plastic surgery, who manages to dress age appropriately but still kind of cool and hip in her own classic way. And the irony is, the thing that probably makes her so beautiful and sexy to me is the fact that she seems to be comfortable in her own skin. That, to me, is a very attractive quality.

    Reply
  266. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    Yes, she has bouts of uncontrollable anger, and acts out. From what i’ve come across when Googling different key words, it’s been apparent to Jolie/Pitt from the beginning. Said Brad and Angie had many a row over Angie not defending little Shiloh from Zahara’s attacks and bitting her. So, Shiloh will grow up associating being bitten with being loved. How convient for Angie….someone to carry on her personal sickness. I do wish so badly that Brad would just announce it, take Shiloh and give her to his parents to raise in a normal home in Nixa, Missouri….they are devoted Southern Baptists…..a huge difference from Atheist / Satanist Angie@ladybert62:

    Reply
  267. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    That SEX book, I mean how do you explain that. I have never seen it but have seen excerpts. Wasn’t in full on porno in terms of full frontal nudity, depicting sex acts – including some sort of gang rape scene wasn’t it? – and her written sexual fantasies? How the hell do you explain that to your kids? But I guess lots of porn stars may have the same issue!

    Reply
  268. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @harikari girl:
    I agree with all you say and I Love Helen Mirren – I have not seen all her pictures etc – but when I saw her as Jane Tennayson (oops, spelling is wrong) – and saw how she could play strong and vulernable in a believeable female character and then went back and saw some of her other things, Dang, i almost fell in love with her! Plus, I think she is beautiful! :P

    Reply
  269. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Yano…talking about some celebs desperately trying to maintain their youth with surgeries makes me wonder how much can they have? If Angie has had as many as we can identify with photos of her from age two years on….how many more can her structure withstand before it crumbles like Michael Jackson’s nose? And so many have ruined what was naturally aged, beauty. Melanie Griffith is one….Burt Reynolds looks Chineese now….Joan Rivers…oh give me a break…take her stiches, clamps out and she’d fall to the floor an empty shell!…lol

    Reply
  270. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    That would be a fantastic Topic for IAN Celebrities and their Plastic Surgeries!! Angie could fill a book single handed!!

    Reply
  271. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    It seems to me that evil Ms. Jolie hates herself so much that she hates anything that her body has created – and I mean those children. Poor Shiloh, I had no idea she was mistreated by the other children in that strange family. And from what I have seen, the evil Ms. Jolie certainly prefers the little boys to the girls and seems to have a special distain for Shiloh. That is plan unnatural to me (I have no children but I think it is natural to have an emotional bond with a child you have carried) unless you hate the child itself.

    Reply
  272. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    I saw a few of the graphic photos from that book, and i wanted no more of it. Gave it back to my g/f who owned it and told her burn the damn thing, it’s garbage. Madge is obsessed with sex in a non healthy way. As she ages, she’s becoming desperate to keep her sexual appeal…imo…..which is making her more of a joke than if she’d just aged naturally and accepted it. I once saw a photo she allowed to be taken when she was a minor…just under 16 y/o….it was a twat shot…and at first i thought her pet ferrett was laying on it covering it from A-hole to pubic bone, until i realized it WAS her bush….i thought i’d throw up@Keane:

    Reply
  273. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Gross, gross, gross – that has always been my opinion of the “stranger in a strange land” Madonna! :P

    Reply
  274. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @Knowone:

    No it was just that some posters who are regulars over here have gone over there and are slating me, Ian, her, Patty Anne etc. She thought these people were her friends and was hurt about it. The only one I really considered a friend was Canuck though and I would be surprised if she would go without saying anything. If I or anyone else had pissed her off I would have thought she was the type of person to say so rather than going to another site and discussing it behind our backs. She’s an intelligent, educated, well-travelled lady with a lot of life experience, I would be surprised if she was drawn into the petty squabblings on a blog. Maybe Kate saw more of them as friends though and took it more to heart. I’m sure she’ll be back, I just think she’s had enough for the timebeing and needs a break. She has been attacked in such a horrible way over the last week or two, people attacking her for having an opinion on a post about rape as a victim of rape herself was just disgusting. Kate and I have been abused day after day on this blog ever since its inception, and way before the vast majority of people were here, and I have proabably responded by attacking more than I should, and she has maybe just felt hurt and had enough. Some of the abuse has been out of control and it is so unpleasant in a place which is supposed to be fun. I definitely think people have been trying to hound us both out which is why I have never given into it, which is why i think they targeted Kate instead because they weren’t getting anywhere with me. She’ll be back, I think she just has issues in her real life – as do I – that are upsetting her and she doesn’t need any of this shit here. It’ll turn out alright in the end, we just need to give everything a chance to settle down.

    Reply
  275. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @harikari girl:You’re right about aging, HKG, but it is OUR responsibility as women to embrace it naturally. Wisdom does not come with youth, only with age. So, some women in the public eye (Helen Mirren, Candice Bergen, even Kathleen Turner) do it naturally and I wish so much that they would be lauded for it, not ridiculed. The damn Miss California (hater) was bashed more for her anti-gay stance than for her fake boobs, which were paid for by the pagaent, which I thought was by far the bigger scandal, but it was only a one day story. Next day, Dr. Phil is telling a 17-YEAR-OLD GIRL (emphasis intended) that he understands why she (an a-cup) would want and should get a boob job. I threw something at the TV. What a mess he is, telling the young women of Amercia that they are not pretty enough by simply being natural. Natural is king. We must turn this thing around in our sick, sick culture. I’m counting on you to be our voice in Hollywood. It’s a tough gig, I know. : )

    Reply
  276. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    As for Helen Mirrin..i love her! She’s one well adjusted woman! Hawt! Intelligent! Self Assured! She’s worth all the Angelina Jolie’s in the world. I truly enjoy the English movies, and look for them when surfing the tube. Under the Tuscan Sun, and there was one in which the wife took a holiday to Greece….hubba hubba. Their actors characterize REAL women, real men. I much prefer that to all the A.J.Tomb Raider phonies. A.J. even said they stuffed her rubber Lara Croft suit to make her curvier and boobier….lol. We women should feel proud to be REAL…we’re becoming extinct! My boobs are large, but starting to want to check out my shoes, my tummy is a bit poochy, i’ve born two children, my hair is getting silver wings at the sides, which i love, and i’m now in bifocals….but!…i’m one hell of a woman!!!….just ask hubby…wink!!!

    Reply
  277. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @Keane:I’m surprised that anyone would post one thing here and another thing there, using the same moniker. I applaud the honesty in that, but not the talking out of both sides of the mouth aspect. Isn’t that the exact “behavior” this very blog (and there’s frankly) has been created to illuminate? Brand, saying one thing, doing another, antics? I guess people are very, very skeptical about the nature of Ian’s revelations? His sources are being scrutinized, and therefore, so are we, mainly you and Kate, for being here from the start. Whatever, everyone can either read a thread or not (I don’t really want to comment on the David Carradine thread, but have read it, for example) and that’s how I deal with the fun/dark nature of gossip. Read/comment as you like. Don’t as you like. There’s really no reason to attack anyone else for their opinion, unless of course, they come here specifically for a beating, which I think you do a pretty good job of accommodating : )

    Reply
  278. ladybert62 said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Thats funny! You sound perfect!

    Reply
  279. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @Knowone:

    Ha ha! Well I’m trying to hold back a bit on that now as people who don’t know any better think that makes me a bully (eyeroll). Its fine however for a multitude of different posters to come here day after day after day and gang attack me, which has always been the way. I call fighting back “defending myself/Kate/Ian/whoever”, they call it “bullying”. Whatever. Things will settle down. If people want to leave the blog and take sides with people at FF that is up to them. Certain people like DebFrmHell have always posted on other boards anyway so its not like she was loyal to here. People will come, people will go, there will be times when I can’t post much depending on what I’m doing workwise so its not really that big a deal. I think we just need a few more stories from Ian when he’s back on his feet to get things up and running again and we’ll just have to see how it goes.

    Reply
  280. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    @Keane:Yeah, we need more Brand revelations, fer sure. I agree, what some call bullying, I call defending. Some say potato, some say vodka. (can’t recall where I read that, but I did enjoy it enough to pass it along.)

    Reply
  281. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    I think for them it is the excitement of mass hysteria and the adrenalyn rush need to fight. The topic they created on FF was ” IU Hostility ” …yet no one from IU went to FF to initiate a fight, call anyone names, insult, demean, or show hostile agression to any of their posters. To them it was perfectly fine to incite one another on that IU Hostility Topic site of FF, and then have several come here to cuss us out, call us names, insult our intelligence. Where is the logic in that i ask?@Knowone:

    Reply
  282. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    @Patty Anne:Well, as smarty pants Keane has suggested, best not to look for too much logic in the mind of an anonymous internet poster, present company excluded, of course. LOL (We put the smart in smart ass, if you ask me.)

    Reply
  283. Keane said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    @Knowone:

    I say tomato, you say bacardi breezer and all that, ha ha! I don’t think much of the FF IUC revolt to be honest, I think it will collapse when SZ takes her knickers out of a twist. Until then I laugh in the face of our bad arse, smart arse reputation and fully pull up my big girl smarty pants! Night all, I hope some sanity has resumed tomorrow! x

    Reply
  284. Knowone said on June 8th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    @Keane:Nighty night, Keany girl. Sleep tight.

    Reply
  285. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Yes, for Tomb Raider, AJ was only a 36 C, the producers claimed that the character in the video game was a 36DD (? don’t quote me on that) and so the filmmaker split the difference and made her a 36D, I believe. So, yes, they padded her up one size….

    Reply
  286. justhelping said on June 8th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    I love your avatar. That woman is beautiful. @harikari girl:

    Reply
  287. harikari girl said on June 8th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Well you know, there are quite a few actresses out here – working actresses – who have exactly the same feelings about Helen Mirren as I do. So while everyone calls us Hollyweird and speaks in generalisations about us, we don’t all ascribe to that fake beauty (although I would venture every single one of us feels the pressure). Keira Knigtley said it best “I could never live in Hollywood because I wouldn’t be able to deal with the pressure of being perfect all the time.” And that is kind of expected here. So — I guess it’s a double edged sword. But it is at least a start that quite a few of us look up to the Helen Mirren’s as opposed to the cosmetically altered Madonna’s.

    Reply
  288. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    i second that Justhelping, reminds me of a young Audrey Hepburn@justhelping:

    Reply
  289. Patty Anne said on June 8th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    I think the magazines and the tv programs push that unatural expectation for women in HW. I loved how Jamie Leigh Curtis presented herself as she actually is, and a few others who have come out to say this is a natural woman at this stage of her life…. Our young girls of today are under such pressure to be what they perceive to be beautiful by phony HW standards…Paris Hilton, and all the other stick thin girls. It’s a wonder they even have menses… I much prefer the European way of celebrating age, relishing in a woman’s beauty with age.. I for one refuse to alter my natural being…just my personal choice….but i am as proud of my natural body as Paris Hilton or any other of the implanted, plastic surgically altered starlette….. :-) @harikari girl:

    Reply
  290. keane said on June 9th, 2009 at 4:37 am

    @ Kim on the bidet – loves it! Sorry just saw your post. Perhaps we could all adopt K based names one day and Ian based names the next just to amuse ourselves, and take the piss out of the freaks of course!

    Reply
  291. Podnosniki24.biz said on November 15th, 2013 at 1:30 pm

    , potarł klub

    zapalniczki, Pobłażliwa usługi dźwigowe. Zaciągnął się, wydmuchując Podnosniki24.biz dym
    w oblicze niziołka. Palił camele, natomiast

    jakim sposobem. Milczał w poprzek chwilę, Dwóch fałszywych
    specnazpwców zaciekawiło lookalizacja po jego

    bokach, dubel pozostali zniknęli, Frodo nie mógł skierować łba,
    mógł przed chwilą

    powtarzać zajrzeć w bok, działając zresztą straszliwego zeza.

    - Naszli? – rzucił Kirpiczew w bok, nie spuszczają.

    Reply
  292. a said on June 29th, 2014 at 10:47 pm

    Hey there I am so happy I found your weblog, I really found you by mistake, while I
    was researching on Aol for something else, Anyways I am here now and
    would just like to say cheers for a fantastic post and a all
    round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design),
    I don’t have time to go through it all at the minute
    but I have saved it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read much more, Please do keep up the great work.

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

June 2009
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Meta