IUC Exclusive: Is Angie Considering Running for Office? Is She After Barry-O?

Posted on June 3rd, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Angie has told friends she’s convinced she can become the first female president in the U.S.  A source told IUC Jolie recently admitted how bored she is of Hollywood and said she has her sights set on Washington.  The A-list actor also recently told friends repeatedly how hot she thinks Barry Obama is.  “Angie thinks Barack is the hottest guy out there today,” a close friend of Jolie told IUC.  “She loves his smile and thinks his body is extremely sexy.”  Will Angie try to steal the prez from first Lady Michelle the same way she stole Brad from Jen?  let us know.

  1. dani said on June 3rd, 2009 at 8:32 pm

    Oh Pul-Leez. Get a new source would you? One that has more believable information?

    Reply
  2. ladybert62 said on June 3rd, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    Dang – this was good for a big laugh and I finally get to see the famous “horse/evil Ms. Jolie’s boobies” picture which I had never seen before but do I see the Dark One as the first female president! Falling off my chair laughing out loud! Do I think the evil Ms. Jolie wants to displace the magnetic Ms. Obama – well, the evil one may want to, but “no way Jose”! This story is totally unbelievable in my opinion. :P

    Reply
  3. Kate said on June 3rd, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    @ladybert62:
    LOL I think IAN Is partying to hard in Montreal, we did this story back on April 21st, remember SUGAR RAY gave us this story, and then IAN gave us one about her wanting to be president right after that, saying that Hillary would be too old so she thought she could take it. he he

    IAN, People denied the split, what cha think?

    Reply
  4. Ms Agatha said on June 3rd, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    I hope we are getting something big tomorrow…this is just the fun build-up of the real good stuff…..suspense rising……AJ for president yeah, I can see her and her too big family throwing pizzas on the walls of the oval office……lol

    Reply
  5. Kate said on June 3rd, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    IAN, this was April 2nd- so are you now saying you actually believe this?
    SR did the BO story a few weeks later, she is starting to maybe look pregnant..
    anything else on that, has Braddy run back home?

    IUC Exclusive: Friend of Angelina Jolie says She’s Getting Ready to Run for Prez in 2016
    Posted on April 2nd, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive
    I’ll reserve judgement on this one – but according to a close friend Angie wants to become the first female prez of the U.S. “Hilary will be too old to run,” the friend told IUC. “Angie is seriously thinking about going for it. Look for her in the next year or two to kick off things by running for Congress. One of her idols is Bill Clinton. She will seek his advice on how to position herself.” Developing…

    Reply
  6. Ms Agatha said on June 3rd, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    @Kate:

    She will seek his advice on how to position herself.” Hahahahahahahahahahahah….sorry, can’t help myself
    visualizing the scenario….

    Reply
  7. Kate said on June 3rd, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    ha ha well she did that already , and he told her beat it, oh sorry, no, he used another word,and she did, then he got tired of it, and he is ignoring her, or we thought..gee what if he were baby daddy lmao that would be something eh? Talk about having some insight into the White House. he he, I bet he never goes there, and that is why she was only allowed to be on her knees..Sugar Daddy is he still, where is SUGAR RAY??

    Reply
  8. Ms Agatha said on June 3rd, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    @Kate:

    You have me rolling on the floor…… wearing a blue dress perhaps ? hahaha . After she finishes that condiment movie she takes the too big family to Portugal. If he is baby daddy, Shi will not the only blue eyed blonde in the family any longer ……. Now, THAT will blow up a storm …. oh sorry, meant to say that would rock ! lol

    Reply
  9. Kate said on June 3rd, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Well, the other one was the young stud and he was black wasn’t he? I have forgotten, let’s see these pregnancy rumors have been going around since February when she started SALT , that would make her about 4 months along, she was doing alot of banging with others during that time according to SR, there and not with Brad, so who knows, maybe even BBT or Oliver Martinez, could be anyone if she is pregnant. I just have this sick feeling she is. Her wardrobe changed drastically over the last few weeks on SALT, she was wearing these fitted little coat then all of a sudden baggy draw string pants. For all the drugs and booze lets hope she is not, that would be pretty awful for the baby. jmho It could explain them denying the split in People, that is a stong denial. If they are split what is the point of doing that? They could have gone more on the sly so it would be easy to back out of, but “absolutely not true” those are strong words from Brads rep. Sounds like they are back together and the only thing that would explain that would be if she were pregnant.

    Now it can be tested, but would they? I know people who have but their health was not fragile like hers, it does have a risk of miscarriage. That is something I would not agree to myself. What are the chances she would. None imo. Now they may have done some ultrasounds to determine when they feel she got pregnant and by that figured out if he was daddy, and she convinced he is. That is about the only thing that I think they might have done. They have DNA test for paternity you can even do at home now once a baby is born. Brad could test all the kids if he needed to . lol

    I wonder if IAN knows anymore about this.

    Reply
  10. Togi said on June 3rd, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    @Kate:
    This is just ridiculous! I don’t know what to believe anymore. Gadzooks.

    Reply
  11. Kate said on June 3rd, 2009 at 10:45 pm

    @Togi:
    lol none of us do, I tell ya it is ridiculous, just can’t take it serious. If she is pregnant and they stay together and he wanted to be free to go be with someone else, you have to admit, that is some pretty heavy karma, although Ted says he is lovesick for her still even though she is allowing him to stay in touch all the time with Jen. whatever. Daryl at the LA Examier wants us all to believe that Jen is dating a boy toy who is a gay bar dancer, now I could see her releasing that to him for a great deflection story, couldn’t you, after all, the last thing she wants is to be seen as the other woman..ha ha ha

    Reply
  12. I'm on the bidet said on June 3rd, 2009 at 10:48 pm

    WTF?!? Methinks someone has been spiking Angie’s bidet water with crazy juice . . .

    Reply
  13. Ms Agatha said on June 3rd, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    @Kate:

    So the rep denying in People they are going to announce split. Well, People has a business deal with the brange, they got to print what they are told to or no more access to info, and the brange is awaiting the 2nd installment of dough for the twins. And the re will tell the press anything he is being told to tell, so that his clients can turn around and give an exclusive interview on O ( or wherever), thus increasing hype, market value….and more money, and more and more…And for crying out loud: Who is BPs rep ? His brother ! (as far as I know) I believe that all kids are tested, this is as normal as brushing teeth for these people, routine so to speak. And I don’t think he is staying around like in a’ permanent monogamous relationship’ . They never had that and they are not going to get that now. She still has 20 ? years to get menopausal…… there will be more kids along the way…. ahhhhh…. He will come ‘ when he can make time’ for the kids ….. they are living separate lives in big mansions on different continents …. drowning in money

    Reply
  14. I'm on the bidet said on June 3rd, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    What do you suppose the horse in that picture is thinking? Here’s my guesses:

    “Look lady, just because I ate your shirt and bra doesn’t mean we are in a relationship.”
    “If I hadn’t blown my knee at the Kentucky Derby, I wouldn’t have to take lame jobs like this.”
    “Why does this woman smell like morphine and baby formula?”

    Reply
  15. Ms Agatha said on June 3rd, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    @Kate:

    PS. Why would they even bother denying those rumors if they were not true. Their kids probably start reading ( I heard they go to school now) and may be asking mum and dad : Are you splitting up ? Do we get another brother/sister and who is the daddy ? So denying is all for the sake of the kids good lol

    Reply
  16. Kate said on June 3rd, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Well if Daddy is not living there it would make more sense to sit them down and be honest and get them some couseling wouldn’t it? Maddox is probably the only one that truly understands. I agree they probably have a 1 year old spread for the twins dues in a few weeks. They will probably not make an official split until later, but then is she best follow him over to LA for the summer instead of France lol

    I don’t quite get why with all the information that has been put out on them, they have not really been outed..nothing solid really. Biggest frauds, biggest thief, yada yada, but still nothing solid, we really have nothing solid.

    Reply
  17. Ms Agatha said on June 3rd, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    @Kate:

    Nothing solid, you are absolutely right. That’s why I think that something solid needs to get out soon, or people get antsy………..Signing off for the night lol

    Reply
  18. benjaminbutton14 said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:14 am

    bb14. I don’t know what to believe either. But I get the feeling that they have gone separate ways. And I don’t believe that she is pregnant. It would have made more news by now, and she did her own stunts in Salt. She said that she doesn’t like using doubles. Are we absolutely sure that she is pregnant. Even if she was you would think that BP would know it’s not his so why hang around maybe that’s why he left in the 1st place. You are absolutely right we need something solid and we need it now.

    Reply
  19. ruby said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:22 am

    To Ian:

    A close friend of Jolie would NEVER talk to you Ian (unless he/she is just trying to set you up!)! Really would you talk to a person that has claimed your friend f.ucks dogs, her children and is a drug dealer Ian? I wouldn`t do that for all the money in the world. So give it up. That claim is simply not credible.

    Do you dare to adress my post Ian? I bet you don`t.

    Reply
  20. harikari girl said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:46 am

    @Kate:

    “IAN, People denied the split, what cha think?” Didn’t People make that “deal with the devil” to get the baby pictures where they also promised to give only positive press to Brangelina and not to print any negatives stories about the two. Oh, and that they would not use the term ‘Brangelina’ as well? It would make sense why they’re reporting it’s not over…

    Reply
  21. harikari girl said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:03 am

    I think they ARE split. AJ usually uses the exact same tactic for potentially enormous blow out situations – damn, she did it when she got with Pitt and I would not be surprised if she does it while leaving Pitt. Remember how there was just unbelievable scrutiny regarding AJ and BP and were they together? AJ’s way of dealing with that and the public’s knowledge was to put nothing official out in the public eye and then to slowly let it break and develop over the next 18 months. i.e. – pics of her and Pitt on a beach in Kenya making a sandcastle with Maddox, reports of flying her small airplane to different places in Arizona and whatever, and then Ethiopia and Pitt escorting her ‘as a very close friend’ while she ‘visited an orphanage’ (adopted a damn kid and he’s there for such an intimate thing?).

    She did not comment straight up on any of this – remember the “that day will alway be about my son and I make a sandcastle on the beach together” (choking on the bullshit). I think she uses the visual part of the media and realises the power of a photo, and she has so much to lose if Pitt and her are truly broken up, that I really believe she’ll use the media, the silence, the innuendo, the pictures and the press just the way she did when she was actually getting together with him.

    And she has to play her cards carefully because she has A LOT to lose out here. Pitt is well liked, he’s made money for the studio for years. He’s never been a problem for any director or producer or co-star he’s worked with. Plan B is booming and their business model for the next five years looks very strong. Basically, Pitt is still liked by most here. But AJ has NO real production company (whilst Jen’s is getting quite strong) and people don’t trust her or like her – they’re fascinated by her, but if all her secrets come out then they won’t be any longer. She has been labeled as difficult by some producers and some directors and definitely by other actors that have had to work with her and her biggest accomplishments were the Tomb Raider movies – girl’s up shit creek if she doesn’t do some very delicate dancing….

    Reply
  22. harikari girl said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:06 am

    Please excuse all my screwed up grammar in above posting.

    Reply
  23. Unknown said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:31 am

    I THINK ANG AND JEN SHOULD DO A FILM TOGETHER… WHATEVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE ??
    totally. Would RAWK. Would RAKE in the bucks. IAN, get on that screenplay !!

    Reply
  24. In The Year 3000 said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:33 am

    I predict Angie will be First Lady.

    Reply
  25. benjaminbutton14 said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:37 am

    bb14. This article appeared in our evening paper (Australia) interesting read Thursday 6/4/09

    Angelina Jolie, not Oprah Winfrey, Forbes most powerful celebrity Article
    ANGELINA Jolie has unseated talkshow diva Oprah Winfrey as the world’s most powerful celebrity in a new survey published by Forbes magazine.

    Oscar winner Jolie, 33, one half of the Hollywood golden couple dubbed Brangelina with Brad Pitt, earned $US27 million ($32.89 million) between June 2008 and June 2009.

    In pictures: Forbes’ most powerful celebrities

    Her earnings and famous face, Forbes said, were enough to dethrone media maven Winfrey, who earned $US275 million ($335 million).

    Jolie, who came third last year, is known for balancing her movie career and work as a goodwill ambassador for the UN refugee agency with her ever-growing six-child family with Pitt.

    In third place was pop legend Madonna – absent from last year’s top ten – whose tabloid antics and world tour Hard Candy boosted her profile and earned her $US110 million ($134.0 million), the magazine said.

    In fourth place was singer and actress Beyonce Knowles with earnings of $US87 million ($105.98 million), who was lauded by Forbes for her “multi-platform empire”.

    The top male power-player Tiger Woods came in fifth with $US110 million ($134.0 million) in earnings. Despite a year beset by injury, the star golfer remained the world’s highest paid athlete.

    A lucrative touring schedule was enough to catapult rock legend Bruce Springsteen to the sixth spot with $US70 million ($85.27 million) in earnings, and bump director Steven Spielberg to seventh, whose work on the Indiana Jones sequel earned him $US150 million ($182.73 million).

    Actress Jennifer Aniston took the next spot, a cut above her former husband Pitt, with movie hits and tabloid splashes earning her the eighth spot.

    With earnings of $US28 million ($34.11 million), Pitt came in at ninth with his headline-making family life with partner Jolie and a blockbuster turn in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.

    Rounding out the top ten was basketball wizard Kobe Bryant, whose first appearance in the upper echelons of celebrity power came thanks to big-bucks endorsement deals after the Beijing Olympics.

    Anthemic, soul-searching band Coldplay were the most powerful Brits on the list this year with a debut at the 15th spot, following a sold-out world tour and a smash hit album Viva la Vida.

    Also debuting, at number 49, was Barack Obama – the first head of state to hit the Forbes’s Celebrity 100.

    With his historic election to the US presidency in November 2008, the former Illinois senator and bestselling author became “the most famous person in the world”, Forbes said.

    Reply
  26. Jude said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:47 am

    I think Ian forgot he already created this story months ago, and this one offers no more information than the original. Sigh.

    Reply
  27. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:17 am

    @harikari girl:
    I went back and read the denial on US and People. US is really saying that Brads rep said it is absolutely not true that they were going to (announce) a split, and Jolies manager agreed with “not true at all”.

    People was even more vague simply saying it was not true and that it stemmed from the NE saying it was going to be official and their rep said it isn’t.

    So who talked to who? More effective would have been of they had quoted Doug Pitt. US even we by as far to quote a source LOL what no name in this important legit story?

    Reply
  28. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:25 am

    Meant to add, so this is a way of not really denying the split they are just not going to tell he or make it official and this way Brad does not have to look like a liar, unless he does a interview for IB for damage control and says he loves her and they are solid, but then he said that about Jen just 3 months before it was official… Lol

    Reply
  29. harikari girl said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:30 am

    @Kate:

    I think you nailed it – they only denied that they are going to announce it. Both have a public media storm to navigate through – there’s no way they’d just say “we’re done”.

    Reply
  30. chris said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:01 am

    @harikari girl:
    I have to disagree, i don’t think that the split will putt them off the radar, there will be gossip all over, about her, him, ja, and it will never stop. they will be tracked down, to see if she’s depressed, if he goes back to his ex, if the ex meets the kids, and with aj it can’t stop, her private life is sooo gossip material, and if she manages it well, she could even be seen as the victim in the story. so, for me, an anouncement of the split wouldn’t damage them, maybe they have been told by the studios not to do it so the focus stays on the movies coming but i’m not convinced eather. if there wasn’t such a buzz about their affair during the shooting of mams, nobody would have seen it, let’s face it, the movie was a piece of shit, and most of the people who saw it wanted to see “the sexual tension” between them. so i’m really confused because to me they were over and now i’m not sure anymore.

    Reply
  31. sama said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:51 am

    Why if they are splitting would they deny it to people why don’t live their lives, he in LA and she in France, people getting used to it and then end of the year say yes we have split but we are staying friends blablabla

    Reply
  32. Caribsmom said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:13 am

    @Lady – Good Morning! Nice to have you back, but it’s been a slow news week so you didn’t really miss much. Hope you had a great vacation, we missed you!!! We were talking about you on the other Angie Dead at 36 post, did you see that? xoxoxoxoxoxo

    Reply
  33. Caribsmom said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:16 am

    I call BS on this post BTW,. This is just filler to calm the board cos there isn’t anything else to say right now, lots of unaswered questions, never get answered, really frustrating, and Ian MIA with the exception of the odd Post. BLAH!!!! She might want to be president, who cares, I want to win the lottery that doesn’t mean I will!!

    Reply
  34. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:26 am

    @Caribsmom:
    yes think you are right but since he used this back in April I doubt that IAN posted this.

    Reply
  35. Words said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:32 am

    Yawn. Zzzzzzzzzzz.

    Reply
  36. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:33 am

    True Kate, but remember the photos of her at The Hague with a very concave belly? Hip bones protruding? And, at Canne she drank liquor, LOTS of liquor, was nearly falling down drunk to most reports. Something is still very stinkey about this. Do i think anyone would vote for Angie for President? The way this country is going, hell yea….why the Loonies alone would figure out a way to make multiple votes to get her in the oval office…(tongue in cheek) I think IAN is having too much fun right now to get more credible sources. Whoever is coming up with this stuff sounds as if they are still in High School….. With so much more meaty stuff to report/investigate out there….sigh Although i admire Michelle Obama, i don’t particularly feel the need to blog on her. Now Brad, Angie, Mickey, Jennifer, Jon and Kate Plus 8….yea….there’s a lot out there to hold the interest of bloggers… @Kate:

    Reply
  37. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:41 am

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY EVIL QUEEN JOLIE! Now….IAN…..did Brad go to his lover’s side to embrace her with his loving arms and wish her a life beyond exception?? Did they make wild monkey love with the dog until 4 a.m.? Did Angie eat cake? Sigh….i thought this morning IAN would have HUGE news on Angie’s birthday , today, and whether Brad did or didn’t show up for it, and why, where he is, with whom, etc. This old news? Geeze IAN….get a grip!

    Reply
  38. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:47 am

    http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N388CA
    http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N388CA

    Private jet charter
    Gulfstream IV
    N388CA
    Burbank to Republic on LI

    The privatge jet Brad boarded landed in Long Island Tuesday afternoon/evening\
    See the story you may be missing IAN?

    Reply
  39. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:51 am

    The Press Trust of India
    Pitt gifts daughter Shiloh diamonds on her third birthday

    Los Angeles, June 4 (PTI) Recession seems an alien word for Hollywood star Brad Pitt who gifted his daughter Shiloh two diamond and platinum necklaces for her third birthday.
    Angelina Jolie and Pitt’s three-year-old daughter celebrated her birthday on May 27 and and the ‘Curious Case of Benjamin Button’ star surprised the tiny tot with priceless gifts from designer Neil Lane, including a 1.5-carat chain worth a whopping USD 15,000, Us magazine online reported.

    The 45-year-old star did not forget his superstar partner at this occasion and bought her a bracelet decorated with mini gold and diamond jet planes. PTI

    Another By Angie!!! IAN….Angie’s PR team is Quite Busy Right Now…….what’s coming down???

    Reply
  40. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:54 am

    Geeze, am i alone this morning? Lol! Angie seems to be putting out press releases fast and furiously right now…..the “story” of Brad flying to Long Island for her birthday, which i don’t believe, and now the Indian paper which seems to be very PRO Jolie/Pitt Union with the birthday gift to Shiloh and a spare gold and diamond bracelet gift for Jolie…….Angie must be worried

    Reply
  41. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:02 am

    Okay, then i’ll talk with myself…lol.
    First; the story about Brad flying in a private jet to Long Island Tuesday. In the photo, there is no shot of Pitt.
    all that is certain is that the plane flew from Burbank and landed in Long Island.
    Second: the Times of India report on the diamond jewelry Brad supposedly gifted Shiloh on her 3rd birthday

    Reply
  42. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:04 am

    continuation…oops!
    Second: The Times of India report on the diamond jewelry Brad supposedl gifted Shiloh on her 3rd birthday clearly did NOT state that Brad attended , but that Angie and Shiloh celebrated her birthday and Brad gifted her, yadda, yadda.
    Those are the reasons i disbelieve these reports….
    Opinions?

    Reply
  43. Susanna said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:24 am

    Yes, we all know this is a recycled story and none of us believed it at the time, nor do we now! I think Ian has been very busy with the release of his book about the Cirque du Soliel founder. He’ll be back. We are all dying for the scoop.

    Honestly everyone, it just annoys me that Angie is the most powerful celebrity per Forbes magazine. Her celebrity is based purely on scandal and being a manipulator of tabloid magazines. At least with Oprah she actually works everyday on her show, magazine and other projects and is respectable. It would be different if it was just another BS list, but this is Forbes. This just exemplifies the ugly tabloid/celebrity culture in America right now. Let’s not forget it is the same forces that brought us alleged celebrities like Hiedi and Spencer.

    As for the denials in People, I have not read them yet, but as you all astutely pointed out, Brange has the deal for only positive PR with them. They are living separate lives and protecting the brand to seek out more fame and make more money. That is a deal with the devil that will destroy them in the end, for sure. They think they are smart and that they can play the system to generate more fame and power. But my response is that is like thinking you can beat the house in Vegas. In the end, you always lose. Even the Forbes article pointed out that their measure was of celebrity, creating a “brand” in the public eye, and not money or talent. Knowing that at the end of the day cannot be the most rewarding feeling. I would much rather be known for my intelligence, accomplishments, etc.

    Reply
  44. Caribsmom said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    @Kate:What do you mean? If Ian didn’t post it then who did? Color me confused! haha

    Reply
  45. Mari said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    OMG! Seriously Ian? This story is so lame. Is it just me or has this site become just lame? I used to LOVE this site.. and now every time i come on it’s some crap of a story. I don’t know how much longer i can try and convince myself of Ian’s credibility.

    Reply
  46. Words said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    ummmm. snooooore. snort, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Burp.

    Reply
  47. sama said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:31 am

    I don’t understand it, months and months he is taling about brangie and now there are stories to tell (splitting up bp and aj, cannes, brad in la, meeting jennifer and so on) and now he is silent…

    Why?

    Reply
  48. mooki said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:41 am

    Why did Brad and Angie suddenly drag out their publicists and reps to deny, deny, deny the breakup rumors? Anyone care to answer?

    Reply
  49. Susanna said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    @Patty Anne:
    I’m with you Patty Anne, I don’t believe either of these stories.

    Reply
  50. digital said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:46 am

    Ian has been using the posters of this site for research. He doesn’t need you at the moment, so his feeding you recycled, BS stories while he celebrates the release of his lame ass book. Seems you will all have to wait until he resumes researching for his book on the gullibility of internet bloggers.

    Reply
  51. Susanna said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:46 am

    @mooki: To protect the brand. Look where the brand got Jolie this year – the top of the Forbes most powerful celebrity list!

    Reply
  52. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    The only thing that was denied was that there would be an announcement regarding a breakup, NOT that there was no breakup@mooki:

    Reply
  53. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Kate informed me yesterday that the loons had tracked Brad’s plane back to long island. They got the plane number off the tail and then looked at the flight plan or somehow tracked the flight online (seriously?wtf?who does this?) and he did indeed return back east.

    I call BS on the diamond story. Kate said she read that Shi was given a Pottery Barn Kids Kitchen play house because she likes to play house and paint her dad’s fingernails. I believe her post is on the Guy Laliberte thread.

    Reply
  54. ml said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    poor dumb beast. I mean the horse.

    Reply
  55. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:11 am

    And I can completely see her thinking she could run for President. the country would lap it up. I’m not a fan of Sarah Palin’s politics, but after the media went after her with the questions of “how are you going to be a mom of five and be VP?” and other ridiculous family questions that NO ONE would’ve ever asked a male politician, how in the hell would Jolie get away with it? Brad would have to quit movie making because it would become way too obvious that those kids do not have the parental attention needed and how much time they actually do spend with nannies. Plus all of her financial records would come to light. It wouldn’t be pretty. But again, I can see my fellow Americans actually voting for this hosebeast.

    If she ran, I think that election would be even more like American Idol than the last election. Maybe I can phone in my vote? And the worshippers would buy those machines that place a hundred calls a minute….(rant done)

    Reply
  56. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:13 am

    All in the above post and everypost hereafter are all just my opinion and in my opinion for the rest of my days.

    Reply
  57. hughes said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    another ridiculous story

    Reply
  58. too curious said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    One of the stories on the cover of In Touch Magazine is Brad & Angie Meet with Lawyers and the blub underneath says they hired attorneys and are discussing custody of the kids

    http://www.intouchweekly.com/

    I believe this is a tabloid that Brad’s PR stories go to and it seems to be a progression of stories about the split.

    Reply
  59. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    Thank you, so then there was confirmation that the plane that was tracked from Burbank to Long Island did indeed carry Brad Pitt as passanger? I could find no confirming photo or data….@backalleyknees:

    Reply
  60. too curious said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:15 am

    The cover of the new issue of Star has a side story “Brad & Jen: Together in LA” hee hee. No idea if they even met up but I hope all AJ’s people show that one to her. Karma can be a bitch to one who is a bitch!

    Reply
  61. too curious said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Life & Style says “Brad confirms another baby!” but then it is just the stupid quote from Cannes about maybe having one in London.

    Reply
  62. too curious said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:18 am

    And while it wouldn’t surprise me if AJ set her sights on BO I can’t see her as being successful at getting him. He seems pretty focused on his work and not stupid enough to get hooked up with her.

    Reply
  63. TobyKat said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    The official denial, there’s not a whole lot to it. Each of their reps gave one sentence, not true……

    USMagazine, June 3, 2009
    Related: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt
    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are not splitting up.

    Pitt’s rep tells Usmagazine.com reports the couple were about to announce a breakup are “absolutely not true.”
    Adds Jolie’s manager: “Not true at all.”
    A source tells the newest issue of Us Weekly: “They have their fights and moments, but generally things are good. They are happy — and Brad loves being a father!”
    The National Enquirer reported Jolie and Pitt — together since 2005, when he separated from Jennifer Aniston — were going to announce an “official” split, and could face an “ugly court battle” over their $200 million and custody of their six children.
    The Enquirer says the deciding moment was a fight at the Cannes premiere of “Inglourious Basterds.”
    But a witness there disputes tension reports, telling Us: “They had lots of fun and looked so in love. At one point, they were dancing.”

    Reply
  64. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Yeah, Just Jolie had a picture of him getting onto a plane. JJ is The Hive of AJ.

    Reply
  65. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:30 am

    One thing is certain; the situation, what ever it may be, is heating up. The reports pro and con are doubling this week, with Angie’s birthday being today and Shilo’s birthday being May 27th. Too many questions would arise if these were ignored totally. I do believe they are way over their initial lust for one another, and after the passion cooled off, they discovered they really didn’t much like the person each truly is. But, as they created this fantasy personna known as The Brand, they must use care and all their PR resources to end this without ruination of The Brand. They have milked the public by using nothing more than brilliant press stratigies; no talent, no skill, just PR. If they are alarmed at the intensity of their Loonies, they created them, so they need to keep quiet and deal with them. I did read a comment Brad made awhile ago about their “fans” and how intense his dislike is, saying something along the line of “they should get a life”…lol!!! I thought at the time that was so strange coming from the very person who helped create their fan base of lunitics…..

    Reply
  66. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:34 am

    @TobyKat:
    Those quotes are so lukewarm. Jesus, way to phone it in guys. It isn’t a denial of them separating/having major problems, just the assumption that a separation announcement was imminent. Very slickly worded US. But the “generally things are good” isn’t exactly a glowing statement. I don’t know the speakers tone of voice, but just reading that made me pause. That isn’t a happy couple statement. And the dancing quote sounds like something Lainey would write when imagining her and Bradley on their first date.

    Reply
  67. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:37 am

    @Patty Anne:
    I liked that summation. They created a loviathan. Have fun.

    Reply
  68. TobyKat said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:44 am

    @Patty Anne:
    i don’t think Angie would make it through the vetting process…….IMO she has too much in her past. Neither the republican party or democratic party would touch her in my opinion. Also, no man in his right mind who wants a serious political career would want her on his arm. The US isn’t as tolerant as France……All in my opinion.

    Reply
  69. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:46 am

    http://www.usmagazine.com/news/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-not-splitting-up-2009205

    Tobykat, i just read this article, and it does indeed say they are not splitting up according to their reps….hummm. Smoke and mirrors? I’m more than confused, especially since we’ve not heard from IAN, or SR in such a long time with any newer information

    Reply
  70. TobyKat said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    @Patty Anne:
    I agree with Backalleyknees, this was a luke warm announcement. i never expected that they would announce their break up any time soon. There has to be allot of pre-planning before that happens…..

    Reply
  71. ladybert62 said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:56 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    Hi Ms. Agatha: That was exactly my first thoughts!! Great minds run alike I see! Ha ha :D

    Reply
  72. ladybert62 said on June 4th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    @I’m on the bidet:
    You are funny! Laughing at work when I should be working! :P

    Reply
  73. ladybert62 said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    @In The Year 3000:
    Really? “First Lady” of what? Porno lifestyle and movies – that is what her future holds! :D

    Reply
  74. ladybert62 said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @Caribsmom:
    Yes I did! I read all of the posts (almost as exhausting as my working vacation – if you go and read my response to your suggestion that we were canoeing and fishing – I am still laughing at that one) then you will know what I mean! Glad to be back and reading all your funny posts! :P

    Reply
  75. ladybert62 said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:07 am

    @Patty Anne:
    The day is still young Patty Anne – maybe more will come later! :D

    Reply
  76. ladybert62 said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:09 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Disgusting! They have so much money and this is how they spend it! I thought they were trying to save all the third world countries – maybe they should have given this amount to some poor children in New Oreans since the federal goverment has disowned them! Boo to hapless Mr. Pitt. :-(

    Reply
  77. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/celebritology/2009/06/angelina_jolie_tops_forbes_mos.html

    Now i know the world is really messed up!!Angelina Jolie Tops Forbes Most Powerful Celeb List

    Reply
  78. meg said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    @ruby:

    90% of the time, many true rumours about the stars are given and confirmed by their closest friends for the money.

    Reply
  79. tessouille said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:53 am

    it has been tough for us to see Bruni getting married with Sarkozy. We’re all laughing coze we knew about THE STUFF. Just fake and irrealistic but it’s not the business people. Our business is ” just reading between the lines” and being aware of the fake couple they’re. And believe me, WE ALL ARE!@TobyKat:

    Reply
  80. d said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:00 am

    not GRASSHOPPER………..http://www.usmagazine.com/news/actor-david-carradine-found-dead-200946

    Reply
  81. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:01 am

    David Carradine hangs self in Bangkok!

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/

    Reply
  82. sinker said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    oh please please PLEASE let her run. skeletons will coming running out of the closet like the NYC marathon. >:-}

    Reply
  83. sinker said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    @Patty Anne:
    saw on another site that AJ’s manager is on the Forbes Board (Geyer Kosinski) just repeating, i didn’t fact check.

    Reply
  84. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    Well now that makes sense to me. I think all the power they’ve managed to exert over the press has gone to their heads. They’ve begun to believe their own PW which in my opinion is a very dangerous thing.
    So many conflicting reports coming out now; Angie’s definately pregnant — Angie is not pregnant; they’ve gotten an annulment, but no confirmed location, time, date, etc of either a legal marriage ceremony or an annulment of such; Brad is meeting with Jennifer again – Jennifer denies such reports and is stating she has a new “boy toy”…. We’re mainly speculating, and spinning our wheels here. What do we know with certainty? What has hard proof to back it up as fact? Frankly, at this point, i’m not sure of anything@sinker:

    Reply
  85. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    @mooki:
    Hey Mooki

    Well the answer to that could be:

    1-Quentin told Brad not to muck up his film opening

    2-The twins are turning one on about a month and they need the rest of the money

    3-Brad needs to hide the Sudanese and deflect off of her

    4-Brad wants to take the heat of Jen so they can continue to see each other privately

    5-They need to get the kids exiled in France first

    6-none of the above because they didn’t

    What is your best guess considering they did not use any names at all…

    Reply
  86. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @sinker:
    yes and interesting these announcements came out together isn’t it?

    Reply
  87. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    Fox news in 1 min : AJ tops O

    Reply
  88. v said on June 4th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    You know what’s funny IAN??? Neither one of the JP’s would have you wipe the sh!t out of their @$$es. That is how disgusting and vile you are! You are nothing but a pig, you d@mn sure have a hard on for Brad so you insult his love Angelina. Well too bad, go fine someone else to lie and obsessed about. You are scum and the only people who do not know this are the ones who believe your rubbish. You should be sued for defamation, you know d@mn well you are not a real journalis but a liar. If it were not for your lies on the JPs your site would be gone and you know it too. Well gues what their fans are alerting the advertisers on your site to let them know what a cunning piece of lying filth you are!

    Reply
  89. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Wow. It seems really disrespectful that they’re puting out auto-erotic asphyx. as a possibility. I’m sure the family is so happy to have that printed. That’s very sad if it is suicide (sad no matter what). Thoughts with his family.

    Reply
  90. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    You would have made more valid points with your argument IF you had stated any rather than to resort to name calling to prove the very point so many of us share here; Brangaloonies are NUTS@v:

    Reply
  91. moo said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    @v:
    You forgot bit about everyone here being jellus h8rs .

    Reply
  92. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    OY!
    You and your facocta stories.
    *laughing hysterically*

    Reply
  93. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    Good heavens yes! I want to not have sex with a stinkey, horrendously bad hygienic care Peter Pan Man while i’m screwing the family dog as one of my kids suffers with a horrible cold in the next room. My knives aren’t sharp enough lately to enjoy the Big O by cutting while i’m participating in orgies with multiple people, plants, and animals either. My plastic surgeon has died, so i’m stuck with this phony face that is dropping to my knees, and my breast implants are slipping sideways….Oh Yes!! I”m sooooo jellus of Saint Angie the doggy louver….slurp, slurp, easy fido@moo:

    Reply
  94. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    Well he was still in Montreal last night I would guess, and I am just thinking he may have had someone put something up to calm the masses til he gets home and they just happened to use a story he had used before. He knows what he has used just two months ago. He is in the middle of a book promotion so he is not focused on the Brange right now. I am sure when he gets home we will here more from him.jmho

    Reply
  95. Unfuckingbelievable said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @v:

    I am am SURE the advertisers will care deeply
    *rolling eyes*
    ya fuckin’ loon.

    Reply
  96. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    fully agree. sad story in any respect.

    Reply
  97. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    @v:

    The word lunatic is borrowed from italian “lunacus”, Italian which gains its stem from “luna” for moon, which denotes the traditional link made in folklore between madness and the phases of the moon. BTW: We are approaching full moon tomorrow !

    Reply
  98. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    According to their reps…….. and those reps who told People they are not splitting up are????
    Jolie still using Guyer Kosinski? Was it he who gave that report to People?
    Pitt used to have Cindy, but didn’t she quit Pitt? Was it then his brother Doug?
    don’t you just hate annonymous informants…so hard to check the information out@Patty Anne:

    Reply
  99. cnn poll said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    CNN poll: Angelina Jolie: Is she more powerful than Oprah Winfrey?

    NO 84 %

    http://edition.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/

    Reply
  100. d said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    Jennifer aniston back in LA http://x17online.com/celebrities/jennifer_aniston/spa_day-06042009.php

    Reply
  101. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @v:
    V, if you will notice it is not IAN making the claims but the sources, who all sign off before he posts the information, which is why he has not been sued. These people know that they could be called to task to back up every work in a libel case if necessary, so your anger is directed at the wrong person. As far as the advertisers they are well aware of the site they are attached too. If Brad or Angelina were upset with Ian they could as you have said shut the site down long ago, as they have tried. Problem is, you can only do that if the information can not be backed up in truth, which is why the site is still here. jmho welcome to IUC hope you will stick around and see for yourself IAN is not the source.

    Reply
  102. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    Thank you for posting this link. Seeing photos of Jennifer Aniston is like a tall drink of cold water after a day spent out of the dry , baren desert.@d:

    Reply
  103. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    @moo:
    lol according to Daryl Pitt wipes his on his hand..so yeah I agree with V they would not wipe it on IAN lmao

    Reply
  104. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Thank Gawd They Had Children, Or Brad Would Still Be Wipping His Arse With His Left Hand And NOT Cleaning It Prior To His Discovery Of Using A Baby Wipe Rather Than Washing Up!….lol@Kate:

    Reply
  105. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Brad-Pitt-forgot-about-Angelina-Jolie-s-birthday-2999.shtml
    Brad Pitt forgot about Angelina Jolie’s birthdayAngelina Jolie spent her birthday alone, in a New York hotel suite, watching an HBO movie. By

    11th of June 2005, 12:58 GMT

    Angelina Jolie spent her birthday alone, in a New York hotel suite, watching an HBO movie. It looks like Brad Pitt, her partner in the comedic thriller “Mr. & Mrs. Smith,” forgot about her birthday. The two actors were not seen together during the trip in New York, to promote their latest movie, “Mr. & Mrs. Smith.”

    “Apparently Brad forgot my birthday, despite all the hints I gave him,” said Jolie. “I wasn’t too happy about ‘celebrating’ by myself, watching a movie on HBO and ordering a salad from room service. If I’d had a gun, I’d have shot him.”

    Well There You Have It….Brad Would Not Dare Miss Another Of Jolie’s Birthdays For Fear Of Being Shot…lmbo

    Reply
  106. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Well I think if St Angelina does run for Prez then she should definitely use that picture in her election campaign. I can just see the slogan now: “Vote Queen Angelina, friend to all our four-legged friends, the biggest animal lover the world has ever seen”. I think she should definitely run with that, it will win over middle America’s pet-loving masses, at the same time as sending a coded message to all animal “lovers” that she supports their right to love who they choose too! Its a winner! Seriously Ange, I’m on board for this campaign strategy, just say the word and I’ll have the posters all printed up in a jiffy.

    Reply
  107. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    Could this be the reason Jolie always places her hand just above Pitt’s widdle wee wee?

    http://www.imnotobsessed.com/2007/09/05/brad-pitt-tattoos-angelina-jolies-birthday-on-his-stomach/

    Someone with a really great eye over on the JJB spotted a new tattoo that Brad Pitt has on his stomach. It’s written in Khmer and says… 06/4/75 – ANGELINA JOLIE’S BIRTHDAY! Can you believe it?! :) To make the whole thing even more romantic – here are a few shots showing Angelina placing her hand over the spot where her birthday is. Coincidence? Or their little secret?

    Reply
  108. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Celebtv.com video regarding the split
    http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2009/06/04/brad_pitt_gives_shiloh_diamonds_for_thir

    Reply
  109. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @Patty Anne:Wonder if it’s to cover the scar from where she removed his balls.

    Reply
  110. Constant Gardner said on June 4th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @TobyKat:
    Ha, that crazy bitch couldn’t survive vetting for Dog Catcher, pun intended. That is why she had to go the route of the UN and CFR-they are both havens for criminals!

    Reply
  111. Constant Gardner said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    In other HW news, some foreign press outlets are suggesting that David Carradine (official story is found dead by his agent of natural causes) was actually found in a wardrobe in his hotel room in Bangkok with a rope around his neck and his genitals bound, suggesting Auto Erotic Asphixiation as the true cause of death.

    Reply
  112. sama said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/the-tab-covers-through-the-years-t226927.html

    If you see the headlines how many times they have said that they are splitt or that brad talks to jen
    (this time jen also denied the meeting with brad)

    It is all repeating….. i don’t believe anything anymore…. maybe they will splitt, maybe they are staying together….. i don’t believe that jen wants brad back or that she still loves him (maybe only as a friend), everytime she is single they will tell this story and now she was in ny when they were there so they have to make a story up that she is meeting him then they will sell their magazines, i just want them to let jen out of it, i hope she finds a guy that adores her and that she is happy and i hope she will never go back to him……….

    Reply
  113. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    Roflmbooooo….now that makes more sense to me@Different Guest:

    Reply
  114. chris said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @sama:
    i hope that too, she diserves so much better than this jerk ! especially if it is to take care of the kids he collected whith his mistress. totally agree with you on that point. and for the two others, we can talk and talk, and talk for ever, they diserve each other. what they don’t diserve is their fame. they’re not even that good at their job

    Reply
  115. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    I’m beginning to wonder that myself. As a Redneck friend of mine down here in the South says, “It stinks like a phart in the wind, then blows away and it’s over” Weird analogy, but it fits this situation. I’m beginning to belive that The Brand fires up these rumors “Brad and Angie Splitting!” and “Brad phones Jennifer” to get publicity when it’s been a bad while for them moviewise. When all their projects bomb, they certainly don’t want to be forgotten, so what better way than to stir up the Loonie-Toons with “leaked” rumors of a break up? Jennifer is so over Brad, i’m sure. I doubt she gives much thought to him unless his name is brought up to her, and why would Brad be phoning his ex for sympathy over his relationship with the Ho who broke them up? I know he has a sensitivity chip missing, but to do that he’d have to have a lobotimy! Brad and Angie will be “together” forever….they are greedy people, greedy for money, and for power, so it’s in their best interest to maintain status quo. Maybe all the rumors are just that….rumors to fuel the publicity fire to keep their names before the public so as to keep their star value expensive…..at this point, i’m not really caring much any more@sama:

    Reply
  116. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    Good point chris, and all these “insider informants” are releasing just enough information to keep them before the public’s eye with rumor and innuendos. I am beginning to think that is all this is, a venue for The Brand to maintain popularity/fame and value as actors. I can’t go thru the grocery without seeing at least two magazine covers with something about Brangelina on the covers….good, bad, or indifferent….but! … it’s free publicity! They are horrible actors, lousey human beings, and yet we, the public have made them filthy rich as well as increasingly powerful. I for one would not miss either of them if they suddenly vanished off the face of the planet. As for Jennifer Aniston, no woman in the history of the world has had to bear so much for having done so little to diserve her lot in this. I fail to understand how anyone, yes, even the brain damaged Loons , can possibly justify putting so much blame on the women who gave up her husband to the ho? The twisted mentality in this is scarey to me. Brad is a no good, cheating, lying, adulterer….period. Angelina is a home-wrecking, adulterous, perverted, whore. Yet these two losers hook up and the wife who did nothing….nada!….is made to bear the brunt of the anger…..weird, beyond belief. That is my reason for hoping the break up rumors are true, and that we will once and for all see this evil pairing part ways. A sort of form of justice for what is right, morally, legally, and etihcally…..@chris:

    Reply
  117. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @Different Guest:

    hahaha …. why does he even still wear pants >?!

    Reply
  118. chris said on June 4th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    i don’t understand either how jolie became such an icone for being with pitt, when she was just know for being dumb rider. i think that all the hate they show for aniston is because they think it’s keeping the image of the saint they have of jolie. i’m always suspicious when someone is seen like she is, when people worship someone like that, i think it’s dangerous. we already have heroes in ordinary life, cops, firemen, paramedics, putting actors so high on the food chain is ridiculously insane. they are entertainers, that’s it, stop think you’re farting chanel, that you change the world, you’re not even artits, you’re interpreters, it’s not even your vision we see. you’re just someone who fakes feelings in front of a camera. all the kids do it for fun.

    Reply
  119. mayelag said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    It is remarkable, very amusing phrase

    Reply
  120. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    Re: that Forbes list – well I guess hooking up with Brad and churning out all those kids had the desired effect for Ms Jolie hey? Got her right where she wanted to be. And I agree Patty Anne, you can’t move for magazine covers with Jolie on the front right now, with one fake headline after another. (One today was Brad wants to split not me! Katie Price is also spinning that line right now, they really are two peas in a pod IMO). But I don’t think the split is fake at all, I think that relationship is dead in the water, and I think they nearly split before the twins but he held on for the sake of the kids and agreed to give it one last try. This time I’m certain its final and there really is nothing she can do about it. But re: the press, does anyone remember that BI from last year which said how two celebs hated each other for a variety of reasons and celeb B, while acting so above it all in public, is actually highly competitive in private and resents all the attention celeb A has been getting lately and how a certain “change in family structure” was being brought forward so celeb B would dominate the headlines for the rest of 2009? That has to be Madge (and her divorce from Guy) and Ange in my opinion, no question. I guess these journos weren’t privy to the Madge/Ange fandango though! And I think all these magazine covers and headlines will go on WAY into 2010 unfortuantely. Athough I think the public will start to become sick of them, I think we have literally reached saturation point with their press coverage now. This is sure to start pissing people off soon. Although I’m sure people will love reading about the demise of their torrid affair!

    Reply
  121. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    Hopefully over saturation will lead to their downfall from demand for movie roles, which in turn would force them both to look in other directions…perhaps buy an island and announce themselves dictators? More their style imo@Keane:

    Reply
  122. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @Keane:I think they’ve already hit the media saturation point. Which is why the sharks are circling for the last hurrah.

    Reply
  123. ruby said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    To Ian:

    A close friend of Jolie would NEVER talk to you Ian (unless he/she is just trying to set you up!)! Really would you talk to a person that has claimed your friend f.ucks dogs, her children and is a drug dealer Ian? I wouldn`t do that for all the money in the world. So give it up. That claim is simply not credible.

    Do you dare to adress my post Ian? Or how about you Kate or Keane? Are you still willing to believe ANYTHING without a proof if it is only negative about Jolie?

    Reply
  124. Dethroned said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    oh Kate. This is getting really sad to watch you cling onto the belief that IAN is actually legit.

    I think you’re sadder than the Aniston, or will be very soon.

    I mean it’s obvious you’re a hater of the Jolie, but you’ve really let your hate get to you. You and Keane are more famous than Ian, and it’s not because you are clever or smart, just identified by many blogs and forums as the number one Jolie hater.

    you and keane have more to worry about being prosecuted (even though Keane believes she knows the law, USA and UK do not share similar legal systems)than Ian, because IMO simply doesn’t work when you actually believe what you write and spread the shit all over. You do have cause to be concerned, any one that posts here and is espousing rot about this woman – seriously, all those words back then. Ian is protected somewhat by him being a “journalist” however even Wiki are investigating him and his journalistic integrity.

    The fact you believe Ian has a source says it all really.

    I think you were either bullied in the school yard, or like Keane, were the bully.

    Reply
  125. Dethroned said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    Oh shut up you psychotic woman. Haven’t you embarrassed yourself enough????

    Reply
  126. Dethroned said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    I meant that for you.

    Shut up you psychotic woman.

    Haven’t you embarrassed yourself enough. I know you chased out of Dlisted because of the vitriol you spat and the hatred for Jolie you tried to rouse up. You didn’t get it, and still don’t. Nobody cares what YOU have to say.

    Reply
  127. Dethroned said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    Awwwwwwww can’t reply to Keanesey’s rants. Anyway, it’s her I’m calling out on being psychotic. As if you didn’t know.

    Reply
  128. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    One would hope so, but the fear is Angie Jo takes that as her cue to try to enter the political world on a more full-time basis which is a truly terrifying prospect. She is much safer playing dumb action heroes in films that don’t make their marketing budget back I think we would all agree. And re: the running for office thing, do you think Angie Jo actually realises that becoming a politician actually requires a lot of hard work – and we’re talking sometimes 20 hour days – and not just posing for one-off photo opps? Does she realise that she can’t ask Trev or some flunky to do this work for her but she actually has to do it HERSELF? Do you think she has any concept of that? Because I really don’t. This is a woman who has made ridiculous amounts of cash for remembering the odd line and posing for sexy photospreads all her life. She has never done a real, full-time, permanent job in her whole life, and she thinks she could cope with the workload of a politician? Is this woman genuinely insane? And re: the running for Prez thing, do you think Angie Jo realises you actually have to be a member of congress for a good 5-10 years I would have thought before she could even dream of such a thing? And is she prepared to do all that slogging away on behalf of the ordinary people of her state? Don’t make me laugh! That’s why I think this running for Prez thing is utter bollocks. Hooking up with a political leader a la Carla Bruni I can see. Actually doing a difficult and demanding job on the kind of salary she probably hasn’t earned since she was a teenager I most definitely can’t. As with everything, I think AJ will fall back on her ever reliable va-jay-jay to get a short-cut to where she wants to go without having to do any of the hard work whatsoever. And who said lying on your back didn’t pay hey?

    Reply
  129. Dethroned said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    Oh Honey. He’s not being sued because HE IS A NOBODY.

    Reply
  130. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    Ruby, you need to learn a new song….this is a repeat :
    ruby said on June 4th, 2009 at 12:22 am .
    To Ian:

    A close friend of Jolie would NEVER talk to you Ian (unless he/she is just trying to set you up!)! Really would you talk to a person that has claimed your friend f.ucks dogs, her children and is a drug dealer Ian? I wouldn`t do that for all the money in the world. So give it up. That claim is simply not credible.

    Do you dare to adress my post Ian? I bet you don`t.
    And yes, real friends , for whatever personal reason, do talk with media and spill information. I’m sure Jolie believed Mickey to be a true friend all those years, until Brad pissed him off when he fired him….get it now? BTW IAN doesn’t get sued. Know why? IAN has PROOF of everything he claims….simple@ruby:

    Reply
  131. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @ruby:

    That is correct yes I believe everything I am told without asking for any proof provided it is negative about Jolie yes. If it is positive then I automatically don’t believe it and demand proof. I’m sure you’re very much the same but in the reverse. I think you’ve hit the nail on the head there. We’ve been waiting for a poster as incisive as you for some time now. Caeae/Claea and Mia almost managed it but they didn’t quite deliver. But you, you’re the one. Hurrah!

    Reply
  132. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Lmbo….true. And now with her 34th birthday, the end of the Hooverlike Va-Ja-Ja sucking in idiots is nearly over , after all, i don’t think there are many men out there who would leave a wife/girlfriend/mistress for a “flappin in the wind lips , echoing, worn out, Va-Ja-Ja”…@Keane:

    Reply
  133. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    @ruby:

    Oh and of course Ruby, you do understand that Jolie doesn’t really have any genuine friends don’t you? Just members of staff and f*ck buddies. This type of “friend” never turns out to be that loyal unfortunately for the likes of Jolie. They are what is called “fair weather friends”, or friends who are with you for as long as they’re getting something they want from you, and then when they aren’t, they are more than happy to stick the knife in – or blab to Ian and others in other words. Problem for Jolie is she is a deeply selfish and narcisstic indiviudal who only truly cares about herself. That sort of person doesn’t elicit too much loyalty from people. And if you’re wondering who all these “friends” might be other than staff members or f*ck buddies, then just think how many people she’s working with on all the films she does. Including co-stars, crew and extras we’re talking hundreds for every film. And let’s just say Jolie’s reputation amongst other actors and production staff is not too great. I think “difficult” is the nicest way of putting it and a word I have often heard applied to her. You see not everyone in the world is a loon, not everyone quite buys her saintly image, especially when they know what she’s really like. So yeah, I’m actually surprised there aren’t more people willing to spill the beans on Madam Jolie. I’m sure more and more will be coming out of the woodwork in the not too distant future.

    Reply
  134. OH MY said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Wow you guys must have it really bad for Angie…you actually sit here all day commenting on her as if you know her personally. Looks like she becomes richer every time and more successful too, while you idiot sit there and pretend to have ‘intellectual’ conversations about her. What a shame that Americans can be so dumb, this is why you are in the economic state you are in. Most of you can barely compose proper sentences and yet English is my 3rd language and I can write better than most of you. I think you guys are small minded, not well travelled and mediocrelly educated at best. Maybe you should travel and see the real world, how real people live and not to sit there and be so crude towards others.

    Reply
  135. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @backalleyknees:Actually, I deal with suicide survivors (as I am one myself) and probably the family would rather have it known as an accidental sex-play death than a suicide. Survivors would be relieved if their loved ones death were somehow not an intentional death, but an accident. Survivors who are blessed enough to get a note left behind (even if it’s vicious) do better than those who are left with nothing but questions. So very, very sad. My heart is breaking for the Carradine family.

    Reply
  136. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @ruby:
    Ruby you sound very frustrated, IAN is away right now, and not online so he is not reading the board. I will try to answer, are you asking if I believe everything that IAN or SR has posted up by his sources? If so, no,not at this point, I still have some questions for both of them, IAN is only posting small pieces because these are just little outlines of what these sources are going to be discussing in the book so that is why he is not going into depth.

    As for a friend not talking to him, I would agree with you on that. I asked the same question, and what IAN told me was that he was working undercover on some of these souces. They did not realize they were blabbing to him, so in those cases they were natually freaking about it later, as in the case with the limo driver.

    Have you ever watched one of his films and watched how he does this, it is really quite funny , amusing to see how these people do not pay attention, how they are just totally, “ah like well man, what can I do to help ya man?” lol serious and hearing his comments under his breath is hilarious.

    I understand why you are upset, I felt that way to when he first reported things I did not want to hear on Jen, but she is a mortal human being like you and I, and what is ..is. Time will tell if these things are true, in the meantime, we will just ride along and see, ever gone surfing, ya never know when you will fall, but it can be one heck of a ride!

    Hope that helps a bit, if not, ask away, I will try and answer what I can. Cheers..

    Reply
  137. too curious said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @Different Guest:

    ROTFLMAO!!

    Reply
  138. benjaminbutton14 said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    bb14. I usually hold my temper but these 2 are pushing the limits. If they don’t want to announce a split ok, but then announce a separation to see which path of direction to takes them and go from there. But all this lying and deceitfulness it just getting out of hand. What do they think, the public can’t see thru their games, they are like a pain of glass you can see right through them. Take Cannes for instance, everybody knew they were faking, when the cameras wer’nt on them they couldn’t stand to be together they both took off in different directions. Brad does interviews and he beats around the bush with answers, god who needs this crap. A friend of mine wanted me to download some of their movies, I told the person ” I wouldn’t waste $2 the disc cost me to put their movies on”. She hasn’t spoken to me since, but that’s her problem.
    Why can’t these 2 come clean with the public their life is like a circus and they are the clowns.
    Sorry about my raving, but feel better having got that off my chest.

    About the Twins, haven’t sigted them since a photo at Jampan airport (wonder how much they got paid for that) I can’t believe that these 2 would take money for photos of their twins. They have to be sick, I guess that’s why we haven’t seen any photos of them, waiting for their 1st birthday and then be given the big handout. What are they going to do with all their money, buy houses in every Country get another handout when the twins turn 2 what a lot of bullshit.

    On a brighter note our own Hugh Jackman has been voted best good looking guy, and will grace the cover of Vanity Fair.
    Eat shit Brad Pitt our Hugh Jackman is worth a million of you.
    I apologize if I have offended anybody about my post but that’s the way it is with me.

    Reply
  139. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    I have to say i agree with you on Hugh Jackman being the most handsome, masculine, decent man out there, and i am so glad that he was awarded the best lookin guy award. The thing about Hugh is that he is as good looking INSIDE as he is outside….huge difference between Hugh and narcissistic, child/man PittY@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  140. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @Kate:

    Aw Kate you could win a medal for your patience and generosity of spirit to those of limited intellectual means shall we say?! Wow, I just go with the sarcasm, I don’t know how you do it!

    Reply
  141. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    I agree that Jackman is a 100% all-round good egg and decent guy. I am however also of the opinion that he is a big gay, not that there is anything wrong with that of course! Ha ha.

    Reply
  142. too curious said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:

    BB14,

    Hear, hear!! Isn’t it wonderful how we here on IUC we have people from all over the world united? Even if it is just that we are sick of the The Brand and them selling pics of their babies to the highest bidder and then complaining about photogs trying to get pics of the kids???

    Ian, thank you for bringing us all together here.

    Reply
  143. too curious said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:

    Oh yeah, and Hugh Jackman is definitely one fine looking man!

    Reply
  144. ruby said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @Keane:

    Really Keane! I thought you were smarter. Costars – who by the way talked very positively about Jolie (see for example her Wanted costar or Clint Eastwood o the dirctor of her current movie Salt or the writer of Wanted, aso) aren`t longtime friends. Ian mentioned close friends – his words not mine! So don`t try to be a smartass if you can`t deliver.
    Again staff members such as nannies are NOT close or longtime friends! I wouldn`t put it past them to say almost ANYTHING if the price is right! Did you get my point? I don`t view them as the most trustworthy sources around. And getting back to associates – well not even Ian seems to trust all of them. See the Sudanese model. So why should anyone else trust what they say if not even Ian does? Hell it was Ian`s theory that Jolie`s friends (who would that be by the way?) were trying to set him up! A theory that vmight very well be true! Which doesn`t make the sources claims any more believable now does it?

    And by the way no I don`t believe anything just because it is positive without a proof. If I did I had to believe the 50 pregnances, 15 weddings aso. Which I don`t. I reserve judgement until a rumor is confirmed with a telling picture (like a pregnancy bump that is not photoshopped by a mag just to increase the sales) or an official announcement (wether it is a split or a pregnancy or an adoption). What`s the point in speculating about something for 4 years and wait for a split that may or may not happen – but IF it happens it happens without your influence or making?

    Reply
  145. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Why is it all the men i’m attracted to are….gay???….lol@Keane:

    Reply
  146. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    I second that! With computers becoming so afordable, the average “joe” can travel the world, meet new people he/she would not have the opportunity to meet otherwise, and make new friends….I enjoy listening (reading actually) the opinions of others, and trying to get a peek inside their take on things…it’s a learning experience and a treat all in one. Basically what i’ve found is that with a little tolerance and patience most anyone can get along…..if they want to. Some howerver, are locked into the name calling mentality as their only way of disagreeing with others. Those people i don’t even try anymore. Seems they have an open mind alright, and all their brains leaked out…..sorry…lol@too curious:

    Reply
  147. ruby said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Kate:

    Nice try Kate! But the main weak point of your post is the fact that noone would talk about the most intimate secrets of a dear friend to a stranger. So no matter who Ian claims to be – believe me it wouln`t help him!

    Reply
  148. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, do you remember in 2007 when Argentina Yahoo screamed they had split, and they swore it was real, it was around the time he kept bolting to Berling and the NE had a headline he had said he was going to leave and take Shiloh. I think they did split then, and the twins changed that, not for long though. It seems quite a few people believe that she did not carry the twins and that both are not his. That is the real story that needs to be broken, because People Magazine is part of that fraud. Then the Brand would cease. jmo

    Reply
  149. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    @ruby:
    It was not meant to be a nice try Ruby, you asked that one of us answer you, I did the best I could. I thought that was what you wanted, someone to reply to you with a serious answer. That is all the information I have, you asked if I believe, I answered that honestly.

    Reply
  150. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @Keane:Me too, Keane. And, I’ve also evolved (or become such a love skeptic) to the point that I love me the gay boys, so maybe I am cut out to be a beard, like Hugh Jackman’s wife. LOL. The best boys are always the ones that will go shoe shopping with ya. Where are they?????

    Reply
  151. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @Keane:
    Well you know I think sometimes their frustration is because they truly do not understand, just like many here ask some of the same questions so it seemed fair game to me. We have all asked those questions at one time ourselves although not quite as abrupt but people are just getting frustrated with the Ang sources, just as we are. I tend to agree to a point, that is how some of these set ups have happened, don’t you think?

    Reply
  152. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @Knowone:
    I understand your point, but that wasn’t the point that I was trying to make. I just found it distasteful that auto-erotic was the first thing a lot of news outlets glommed onto. I’m sure the family would be happier knowing that he didn’t kill himself, it just seems the way he died is very personal and I wouldn’t want that screamed in headlines around the world. How about a simple “David Carradine was found dead in his hotel room this morning. We have no cause of death at the moment and will leave it to the family to decide how they would like to proceed.” The media lie about so much stuff, why couldn’t they have held off on this for a bit and left it up to the family to decide what information has been put out there. Its just another way to get people’s attention in a two minute news cycle and I think its kind of sick.

    Reply
  153. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    @ruby:

    Ruby, ruby, ruby, I am trying to be patient with you dear but you really are testing me, try to calm down and think about things a little bit more rationally. Directors/Producers/Co-stars in public, while promoting and trying to sell their film, will of course do nothing but lavish praise on the star who is supposed to be making the film make back its production costs. You think they are going to slate the star when they’re doing promotion?! Jesus, Mary and Joseph you are priceless. I’m not talking about the people who are trying to sell her product, I’m talking about people who have worked with her and reported back on her when they are not involved in promotion. The word “difficult” has come up on more than one occasion I can assure you. And by “longtime friends”, that could be absolutely bloody anyone, someone she worked with 5-10 years ago and has remained in touch with or bumps into at industry do’s from time to time since they worked together. It could be a long-term fuck buddy – who might also have worked on one of her projects – that woman who blabbed about their affair on Gone in 60 Seconds for one. And it most certainly could mean her staff, as her PA, Holly Goline, who also formerly worked with her on a film, has always been cited as one of her best friends. And then we’re talking stylists, hairdressers, plastic surgeons, personal trainers, these people become friends with the celeb when they work with them over a long time and are often cited as someone’s “longtime friend”. It really isn’t that hard to understand if you try to fire up all your brain cells at once and think about it really hard now is it? And I highly doubt that Ian is paying sources, he doesn’t have the funds to do that. Newspapers and mags maybe, but Ian is not the owner of a publishing empire, he is a one-man-band. I highly doubt money is changing hands. People talk because they don’t like what they’ve been seeing and want to out it. And yes we have had a lot of stories from planted sources (people Jolie is paying to say these things, like her PR people for example) lately which I personally wouldn’t have posted. Ian’s mind is very much elsewhere right now so we have to wait until he comes back and puts his mind to all this and figures out the truth from the BS. And as for you only believing things when you see pictorial proof, you believe that images never lie? You think that just because Jolie had loads of snaps taken of her with an emulate belly on that she was pregnant with the twins and carried them? One picture of a bump and you’re convinced? You need to be a bit, no a lot, more discerning when it comes to judging truth from fiction. And as for me “trying to be a smartass”, I’d just like to point out that I’m not trying to be one, I am one dear, and believe me I ALWAYS deliver! Ha ha ha.

    Reply
  154. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @Kate:

    Amen to that. I think they definitely split before then and she either got knocked up or agreed to have more kids to try to keep him. It worked once but I don’t think there’s any way it would work again. Once bitten, twice shy as they say. I hope Ian can get to work on that story when he has more time. That’s where the major scandal lies I believe.

    Reply
  155. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @backalleyknees:Yes, that would be preferable. But with public figures, they know the media probing won’t end. Because this man is a public figure, media will probe and for the family’s emotional sake, they probably just wanted to get the truth out there as quickly as possible so that the media will leave them alone. I so agonized over how the media treated the death of John Travolta’s son Jett. No privacy, some real shady dealings, and the family can’t grieve. Thankfully, that seems to have been put to rest and the Travolta family has been able to get some well needed and deserved privacy. Just so awful to have what should be a private family matter become a public spectacle. But that is the modern world.

    Reply
  156. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    @Knowone:

    Or discuss the relative merits of different brands of chinaware for example, as one of my BF’s does! He also helps me with DIY, trips to IKEA and moving house though so he really does cover all bases – he’s the straightest gay man you’ll ever meet but he does appreciate a good piece of china! Ha ha.

    Reply
  157. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @Kate:

    What do you mean sorry re: the set-ups?

    Reply
  158. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    I keep being reminded of one of my favorite oldies but goodies movie on TCM….All About Eve. That says it all as to “good friends’

    Reply
  159. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @Keane:
    Well there have been some stories that you and I have discussed that we felt were set up by Jolie..just go back and look at some of them..look at the thread yesterday how many of our own members were listing things that they are confused with,and just last week you did too, we all have at some point, we just have to deal with that until the book comes out is my guess, but it is frustrating. Even Dawn Olson, who was IANS guest on chat, called her Evil Hitler blasted the NE as total nonsense, said they were never married, and basically contradicted many of IAN’s stories, so is is reasonable to see why people come on here frustrated and pissy, so that is why I try to remember when we have felt that way..I know IAN is not going to answer those questions and I know why he can’t, it is his research, he can not just hand it over and sell the book. His other two books took him 5 years to do, he talked to over 1000 people, he is very thorough. He is going to pump out a book on one of the most powerful couples in a few months, I bet not, I bet he pulls it back and checks and rechecks everything…he has too. jmo

    Reply
  160. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Kate:Hear here, Katie girl!!!! That’s my opinion. We’ve ushered in a new era of truth and transparency, so let’s see it in Hollyweird. Fly the freak flag and expose these frauds for who they truly are, and then let the masses decide if they are still buying, when the product’s toxic ingredients are exposed.

    Reply
  161. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Knowone:
    Oh I agree, the twins are the biggest story because if what we suspect is true. It is not just here, go to any board, heck, even the LA Times questioned if she was really pregnant. It is everywhere, it has just died down because they are hidden away. If IAN can prove that those babies were first not birthed by her she will look even more the media whore, because while she has the right to a surrogate, she definitley milked the pregnancy (oh Brad loves my body, we have better sex now, blah blah) but if he can prove that they are not even both Brads and really Pitt offspring, then the money paid by People becomes an issue. Huge fraud, unless of course they were in on it. Someone had to be in on it. If she is pregnant again now I am going to choke at the smugness of this, again. All those who saw her drunk on her butt will stay silent, just like they always do, the ones who saw her doing drugs ,silent. She just gets away with it. Insane.

    Reply
  162. benjaminbutton14 said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. Well said Patty Anne

    Reply
  163. EvetsHeta said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Hi, Congratulations to the site owner for this marvelous work you’ve done. It has lots of useful and interesting data.

    Reply
  164. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    @Keane:And I for one find that to be your single best characteristic. Rock on smart ass. lol

    Reply
  165. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    @Keane:My best buddy since college came out when he was in his 30s (but I instinctively knew) and he felt he was the straightest gay man in the world, and the ONLY republican gay man…..until all the washroom antics came to light and we discovered that those closet cases are running the country (GASP). I so miss him (he moved to another state) ’cause he was a style genius and an amazing accountant. And he had the most beautifully appointed house. And, like me, the straight girl who can’t find love, neither can he……we were a pair. I miss my gay.

    Reply
  166. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    @Knowone:I read a poster comment somewhere that s/he’d heard David speak at something and talk about suicide by hanging and he detailed how the knots and loops had to be or you would mess up and supposedly this was a drapery cord, my immediate thought was maybe he had a heart or stroke while doing the autoerotic thing. So what’s appearing on the surface isn’t the actual cause of death.

    Reply
  167. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes, but remember, she is brilliant like Hitler evil, she would never be so trusting. Not now, in the past yes, but I would bet that has all changed. Pitt has been sabatoged so many times by the press that when he came on the scene he arrived with a stack of confidentiality contracts, something she was not use too..
    according to that website attached to the Mickey book, Pitt did not ever let anyone fly with them but his makeup artist. They keep as few people at home, why, because that is how leaks get out.Many of these stories we have heard here are old, from her past when she was careless with the people around her, we have not heard much of recent, and what we have heard , those we have questioned , Toni, Kimmy, one was having dinner with her one week and spilling her guts then next..so without us knowing the background on why this person would or is doing this it is very hard to judge the validity of the source.jmo

    Now the sources for Brads camp I don’t have a problem with or Jens. Just hers.

    Reply
  168. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @Kate:What’s peculiar to me about the twins is that they and a nanny or two aren’t on set with Jolie. Most mothers of infants with those resources are going to have their babies with them, it’s not like they are seriously mobile yet.

    Reply
  169. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @Different Guest:That autoerotic play is very, very dangerous. It is something I work on to educate young people about. Don’t do it alone unless you are prepared to die. That’s just the bottom line.

    Reply
  170. benjaminbutton14 said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @Keane:
    bb14. As an Aussie I have to disagree with you Hugh Jackman is not gay. I don’t know why people keep referring him that way. He gets very upset when people report that he is gay he has reportably said that he has never been interested in going that way, but he to has said there is nothing wrong with gay people, just that I am not one of them.

    Reply
  171. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Did she have Shiloh on the set with her when she was a baby? or Zahara? I have forgotten?
    That could be because they do not want people to see them until after the one year old pics to People come out in a few weeks. I bet they do a family spread.

    Or it could be that they just do not want people around them to notice the differences, but that is something that can not be hidden forever..which makes it hard for me to believe that they are not theirs.

    Reply
  172. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    @Kate:

    Oh yeah defo, there have been loads that are clearly PR stories coming from her: the suicide, the everyone’s out to get me except BBT and JLM, the crew member talking about her performance I reckon, the Jen stories, the Kickapoo kink story, the rape story – I am absolutely certain about this one, the running for Prez story, the one which said she joked about making pretty kids with her sons (a trap for Ian and us perhaps?), and I also think the abuse story. Not buying any of those right now. Could be wrong on some of them but we’ll have to wait and see which pan out. If I were Ian I would be addressing all those stories right now and saying which ones he does and doesn’t believe. Those sources were all suspect in my view, all sounded highly unbelievable and were defo coming from her. Good smokescreen to disguise what might really be going on though huh?

    Reply
  173. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @Knowone:Oh I know that it is, but given his age and his past drinking and drugging, I think it’s possible that he did have a heart attack or stroke while fooling around.

    Reply
  174. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Kate:I don’t remember if it photos on set, or just photos of both Brad and AJ out and about with Shiloh in the baby carrier. That there have been no photos does make me wonder.

    Reply
  175. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    I think the reason people beleive he is , because one, Ted outed him, two there are people on Data Lounge from Australia that live near him that say he lives with his guy downstairs and his wife lives upstairs. There is something about a ring that his partner gave him that he wears on his right hand and he always travels with him,so that is where it comes from. Is it true, I dunno, I never thought Brad Pitt was bisexual until all this came down. He is certainly secure in his bisexuality to be supporting gay rights if he is, does not seem to be worried about anyone thinking that. It would seem to me if Brad was bi he would not be so obvious, but what do I know. People say they had proof, I always thought he just experimented. I

    Reply
  176. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    @Knowone:

    Ha ha thanks, yes it can not be denied that I am indeed a smart arse and extremely proud of it too! Oh and me and my friend are so like that funnily enough. We both fell majorly in love with someone at the same time who treated us like dirt and got badly burned. We are both still struggling to find “the one” or “another one” so to speak! He will probably be my sperm donor one day when I decide to have kids which is good, although he is extremel tall so I’m a bit worried about how big that baby might turn out! Yeah he’s cool though, gay best friends are always good when you’re the unlucky in love type. They tend to have very similar issues!

    Reply
  177. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    @Kate:
    I don’t remember Shiloh being taken out (for real) until Brad took her on the set of CCOBB. They were much more open with all the adopted children than their biological children. I wonder why? All I know is that I want to babysit Shiloh and let her paint my nails. I’ll even have a cake off with her and her pottery barn kid’s easy bake oven.

    Reply
  178. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    @Keane:
    Yes, you know you can get away with much more on the internet than you can in a book. I can’t imagine he could put even half of those in the book. It would be great if someone would just out them on a blog, with witnesses, with names, the whole deal, with video, with pics, the way TMZ does, they hold nothing back, your caught, busted nothing you can do but fess up. With a book you have to say “my source” unless the person allows their name to be used, which is not likely and then people may not believe it, and they will just try to discredit him the same way they have Mickey Brett. You can bet there will be an all out attack on his credibility when he releases a book on them. He just needs one legit person, Holly, or Cindy G. or someone that worked at Plan B , and associate producer, to out them that would go on the record.

    That will not happen of course.

    Reply
  179. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:

    Hm have you seen his wife though? That relationship has gay man and beard written all over it to me. They might have a geniune relationship but I’m pretty sure he is gay. (Its that musical theatre background too, believe me 9/10 of men in musical theatre are gay). There is a presenter in the UK who is married to a very similar looking woman as Jackman is. He is as flouncey and camp as Christmas but he is in a heterosexual relationship and has children with her. But a Director who has worked with him said he was defo gay, and they don’t really have sex so she has affairs with whoever and presumably he does too. Its a bizarre set up but one I think goes on a lot. Some gay men just get married because they want to have children or conform to society. The moment I first heard that Jackman was gay I saw him in a different way and he has gay man written all over him to me. I would bet my house on it. Most of these actors are to be honest.

    Reply
  180. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    @Keane:
    What’s going on with your government? Did you vote today (and if that’s none of my business you can tell me so)? I read a bit on The Times and have yet to check The Guardian. Are things as bad as they are being reported? Did you ever see the movie that was a BBC production about Tony Blair and Gordon Brown? I believe it was called “The Deal”? Was that the same actor who played Tony Blair in The Queen?

    Reply
  181. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    He took her to the park in Prague , but she was close to 1 years old already. I don’t think we saw her much before the 1 year mark.

    Reply
  182. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    I know I think Shiloh is an adorable child too. If neither of them want her I will definitely take her, and Pax too. They look like the sweetest-natured little children.

    Reply
  183. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    @Keane:
    Does this mean Daniel Craig is gay too? Aren’t they doing a Broadway musical together? NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! James Bond NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

    Have they released those Daniel Craig ice lollies yet? So sad we can’t get those on this side of the pond…

    Reply
  184. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    @Different Guest:Very possible. I pray the media will just leave this one alone…..what are the chances of that? I mean, in a few years, or on their own timeline, the family may want to speak. Until then, my feeling about any celebrity death is hey media, show some decorum. Back the eff off. Because he’s not A-list, that will probably be the case. If he were A-list, like say, Angelina Jolie, it would be a non-stop barrage of coverage (which in the suicide community, actually helps for public awareness and to help reduce the God awful stigma, so it is always a double-edged sword, this media world of ours.

    Reply
  185. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    @Kate:
    They had her first birthday in Prague if I remember correctly. I remember seeing (pictures of) balloons and food delivered to where they were staying. I sincerely believe that that couple was the happiest when AJ was pregnant with Shiloh and their family was happy with Maddox and Z. There was a picture of the four of them and they looked super super happy. Not so much anymore…

    Reply
  186. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    @Kate:I wasn’t thinking so much of actually “seeing” her but of seeing her in a babycarrier (legs and arms). I may be thinking of someone else.
    @Keane:People can have deep emotional attachments that aren’t based on sex that can make them very good parents.

    Reply
  187. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate, agreed that the twins are at the core of it. If it wasn’t for Holly’s blackberry fuck up , we would never have known – I would like to know what happened that day when Holly answered her blackberry and said what was said. We need to know.

    Reply
  188. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Hear Hear on the deep emotional attachments other than sex. Nothing is more beautiful than two partners who love each other for their friendship and want to do right by the young soul that is now in their lives.

    Reply
  189. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    Well, people have been out to get Brown from day one really, and he couldn’t have taken the leadership at a worse time really. We’ve had all this expenses scandal thing going on right now which typically seems to have hit Labour worse than the Tories even though the latter had the more outrageous claims in reality. There is a lot of misconception in the UK all the time about who is responsible for things. Because Labour have been in govt for the past 10 years they are held responsible for the financial crisis, the Iraq war and now the expenses thing, even though it would have been exactly the same under the Tories. A lot of people in the UK have a very knee-jerk reaction to politics in this country though and subtlety often eludes them. Plus we have a predominantly right-wing press that is out to get Labour and get the Tories back in power at all costs, that’s quite a hefty opinion-forming force the govt have to battle against. A few cabinet ministers resigned who would have been for the chop anyway (the loathed Hazel Blears – well I loathe her! – and the not competent or experienced enough Home Secretary Jacqui Smith). So now there’s another plot to oust Brown but I don’t think he’s going anywhere quite yet. He’s a good politician but he gets a lot of bad press because he doesn’t have the flair for spin that Blair had. I personally didn’t vote though, its only the European elections, not majorly significant to me. I only tend to vote when I feel like it will make a difference. When I don’t like any of the candidates I tend to abstain. I didn’t watch The Deal but I do know of it and I think it was the same guy yes. That drama was a bit factually inaccurate though, it wasn’t so much of a deal as someone saying to Blair and Brown that the party wanted Blair and would Brown go along with it. There was never really a deal as such, no such thing. And I do believe they hated each other!

    Reply
  190. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    @Keane:
    I hope I didn’t upset you by asking about politics (though I highly doubt this, you never know). So sorry if I did. That wasn’t my intention, I’m just super curious. There’s only so much we can get in the states. And I watch the news on The Beeb.

    Reply
  191. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    @Keane:
    nevermind! Thanks for your thoughtful response!

    Reply
  192. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    Hm, I think he could be bi….. which actor isn’t really? Not too many in my book! Got to go now, catch y’all tomorrow, let’s all hope Ian is back with a new story for us or at least a rundown of which are more or less credible! Night all x

    Reply
  193. Keane said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    Hell no, of course not! You lot know you can ask me anything by now I would hope! I try to answer most things. There aren’t many things I won’t talk about, just a few that I can’t so much due to the all-seeing eye (lol). And I don’t offend easily, at all. Look at how much crap I take on here! I’m like teflon, it all just slides off me!

    Reply
  194. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    I don’t mean to sound stupid, but what is autoerotic?@Knowone:

    Reply
  195. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    @Kate:I respect Harvy Levin. I said it. I have an amazing Australian ex boyfriend turned life friend (darn) who is a news journalist. He went to Iraq and was actually kidnapped and held hostage. (horrific). Now, he has been “downsized” by NBC and I want to partner up with him and be a celeb stalker, and elevate the art form. lol He, however, has a little more journalistic integrity, and will not stoop to such a career low. I want to go undercover like Ian and only stalk celebs with integrity and only get the shot of them going to grocery. I mean, I want to see what Michelle Pfeiffer wears to Whole Foods, dammit. Harvey Levin’s TMZ is on the right track, but the “celebs” they cover are not my cup of tea. The whole deal can be elevated, in my opinion, and still be harmless fun.

    Reply
  196. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    @Patty Anne:the dictionary definition is sexual gratification through one’s own orgasm – cutting off the blood supply by hanging supposedly increases the enjoyment.

    Reply
  197. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    Holy Chyt! People actually do that? sorry….thank you for the information…..@Different Guest:

    Reply
  198. Different Guest said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    @Patty Anne:Yeah, and more than a few die as a result.

    Reply
  199. TobyKat said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Hugh Jackman is HOT!!!!! I love him. In all the interviews I’ve watched of him he always seems so genuinely nice. He often speaks of his wife and gives her credit for where he is today. i never see pics of his children except for the few that the paps snap while he is on holiday.

    Reply
  200. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Like Micheal Hutchince (sp?) from INXS. Some people hang themselves to get the feeling, while some girls have their boyfriend’s choke them as they are getting off. My friend had her bf do it to her and she came out of it with a huge burst blood vessel in her eye. She said she didn’t know how she got it…I knew immeadiately after she said that they’d fooled around the night before.

    Reply
  201. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    @Different Guest:In the interest of public education, there’s a very horrific trend that has/is sweeping middle schoolers called “The Choking Game” which involves cutting off the air supply through the use of a rope, belt or scarf for the temporary “high” of the oxygen deprivation. It has NO sexual element to it. Kids tend to play it at sleepovers or with other kids, but NOW, thousands of young adults have died attempting to play this game alone. Amazingly, school officials across the country do not want this education to be heard through the DARE alcohol and drug programs. Kids play this game quietly, parents don’t know they’re doing it, and deaths have resulted. But, the dumb-ass schools think that by telling them NOT to do it, that kids will do it, to experiment. So, it’s a very sad “trend” that has taken the lives of so many children. And continues to. Please talk to your kids and grandkids about this dangerous “game” and warn them never, never to put anything around their necks (other kids hands, or restraints) to achieve anything. Go outside and spin around until you get dizzy, or ride a roller coaster to alter your consciousness. These dangerous games must stop. This has been a public service announcement from someone who wishes I did not have to give it. Hug your children and keep them safe.

    Reply
  202. TobyKat said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @ruby:
    Unless they are no longer a dear friend. Some famous hollywood feuds between former friends:
    Gwyneth Paltrow and Winona Ryder
    Rosie O’Donell and Elizaberth Hasselbeck and Barabara Walters
    Johnny Carson and Joan Rivers
    Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis
    Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie
    David Letterman and Jay Leno
    Elizabeth Taylor and Debbie Reynolds
    Just about all of the above have talked “smack” about their former friend. Their feuds or dislike of each other was not a secret

    Reply
  203. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    Amazing what people will do……I can only imagine Angie has dabbled in this as well, considering she admitted to cutting for the better “O”…..i’ll stick with what nature allows….lol@backalleyknees:

    Reply
  204. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    Thank you , knowledge is the best protection against stupitidy. I was not aware, but i will be sure to have chats about such things with the grands….@Knowone:

    Reply
  205. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Lmbo , this is SO funny
    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/06/04/angelina-jolie-34th-birthday/comment-page-4/

    Angelina Jolie turns 34 today and received a heck of a birthday present yesterday. She topped the Forbes Celebrity 100, crowning her the World’s Most Powerful Celebrity. She’s #1! She’s #1!

    The birthday girl is probably out celebrating now with longtime love Brad Pitt and their brood — Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh and twins Knox and Vivienne.

    Earlier this week, Angie was seen shooting scenes for her upcoming espionage thriller, Salt.

    Happy birthday, Ange!!!

    I Swear! Who Writes This Fiction?>?

    Reply
  206. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    haha…… loonfiction…. ‘ is probably out celebrating ‘ keyword: probably…. hey, what if not, but probably in hotel alone calling room service ?

    Reply
  207. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    I now know why Hollywood is so screwed up…i found this on celebitchy…unbelievable!!!
    SALE! LAST DAY THIS SEX TOY WENT TO THE OSCARS.

    The revolutionary WeVibe was in gift packs at this year’s Oscars.

    Come and check it out and see why there are so many happy stars wandering around.

    They Gifted The Celebs At The Oscars A Double Headed VIBRATOR???

    Reply
  208. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    And on my Home Page….headlines and news of the world section…

    Nude Photo
    Gets Big Bid
    Image of French First Lady Auctioned
    Final Price Way Over Estimated Value

    What The Ell Is Wrong With Our World???
    No wonder the loon’s idolize Angelina Jolie…. Bah Humbug

    Reply
  209. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    Ohhhhhhhh Ms Agatha, i’m in shock at some of the things i’ve come across since i began doing Google searches on Angelina Jolie/Brad PittY…..these two former posts have nothing to do with them personally, however i am so surprised at the brazenness of some of these adverts…..Kids do blogs and surf the net….Crikey as Steve Irwin used to say@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  210. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    Lol, true! Did you notice the post i put up earlier today of Angie Jo’s birthday in 2005 in which she says she spent the day alone, in a hotel room, watching HBO. Said she dropped Brad numerous hints, however, he forgot her birthday….well what did the ho expect? He could have left a hundred dollar bill on the nightstand….lmbo

    Reply
  211. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Exactly. A vibrator.

    Reply
  212. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    The most powerful woman :
    All it needs is to star in an action film with a pointlessly title, one too long piece of failed Oscar bait crying ” I want to find my son ” endlessly for two and a half hours and another one you don’t actually appear in person at all, you get bumped up from 3rd place the previous year to the top spot in Forbes. Yeah, does makes a lot of sense…… great role model for our kids …. never mind the other alleged stuff…

    Reply
  213. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    make…oops

    Reply
  214. backalleyknees said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    At least its safer than auto-erotic….

    Reply
  215. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Rolling on floor laughing…… yes, that’s the post I was actually referring to, but couldn’t find it ….. didn’t know it was you …… great mind think alike lol

    Reply
  216. Patty Anne said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    Time for my shower and bed….looking to spinal surgery probably next week, so if i vanish, i will return, eventually….thank you so much all
    Patty

    Reply
  217. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    All the best to you Patty Anne – stay strong – looking forward seeing you back soon !

    Reply
  218. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    @backalleyknees:Tee hee, good one. A girl’s best friend, imo.

    Reply
  219. justhelping said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    Patty Anne I hope all goes well with your surgery. Please let us know how you are. I have been enjoying reading you and everyone else so hurry back. @Patty Anne:

    Reply
  220. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    WTF….. Stefani/Rossdale break up ?

    http://www.gossipbeast.com/?p=1724

    Reply
  221. justhelping said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    new post

    Reply
  222. Knowone said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:45 pm

    @Ms Agatha:I’m deeply bummed. I thought these two were so cute and “normal” relatively speaking.

    Reply
  223. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    @Knowone:

    You just never now these days….. lol … got to check new post …… running

    Reply
  224. Kate said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    ewww, no fun, best wishes Patty Ann, and back safely! You will be missed…:)

    Reply
  225. Ms Agatha said on June 4th, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    @Ms Agatha:
    know….oops

    Reply
  226. Dr.Jerry said on June 4th, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    @OH MY:
    Most of them aren’t American’s they are just bitter British sea hags. You can talk until your blue in the face but,they won’t see where your coming from. They spend most their days hating someone they don’t know personally, for no real reason. They have differen’t reasons why they hate her but, all irrelevant. They will call you a loon etc.. They even answer and speak for Ian as if they are Ian. The group is complied of mostly , older meanies, disabled people and others with severe mental issues. They have no proof of anything just pics they over analyze and so called body experts but, really nothing. Anytime anyone with common sense trys to use rational they go apeshit.

    Reply
  227. ruby said on June 5th, 2009 at 12:06 am

    To Kate and Keane

    Again for those who take a little longer to grasp something: a former friend is never called a close friend or a longtime friend. And were is your proof that Holly Goline quit by the way? If any FORMER friend or exlover would be worried for the kids he would report Jolie to the authorities and not spill the beans on an obscure gossip site. What would be the point in that?
    And really Keane your cynism just shows that you have run out of arguments. It is definatekly not a sign that you are smarter than anybody else here no matter how much you would like to believe that. And the fact that you are willing to take every twist and turn that Ian makes with his stories and sources (such as his claim that the Sudanese was bought off just because she backed back) without a single proof just proves that. Seems like you are willing to kiss anybody`s a.ss aslong as he plays into your dislike of Jolie. Really such childlike devotion is almost cute if it wasn`t so desperate.
    And by the way what about your reading comprehension? I clearly said that I believe a rumor when there is a telling picture and an official confirmation. I know – I know all YOU need is Ian`s word and no confirmation or picture or proof.

    Reply
  228. benjaminbutton14 said on June 5th, 2009 at 1:17 am

    @Keane:
    bb14. I apologize keane I have never heard that here. Yes. I have seen his wife, she is a lot older than him, and they adopted 2 children, I noticed when he did the Oscars he was not wearing his wedding ring, in fact he wasn’t wearing any ring. I did hear that their apartment is New York is on top of Nicole Kidmans, and they babysit each others kids, but then again that could be bullshit as well. Nicole did an interview ages ago when she spoke of Hugh and even she said he wasn’t gay, but then I can’t stand that woman especially with that kid of hers. Why she ever comes back to Australia has me baffled. Anyway thanks for than information it definately changes my thoughts on Hugh.

    Reply
  229. benjaminbutton14 said on June 5th, 2009 at 1:57 am

    bb14. Angie would love this comment.

    Angelina’s “too old” for Tomb Raider
    Is Megan Fox the next Ange

    She’s a long way off retirement, but at the ripe old age of 33 Angelina Jolie’s been deemed “too old” to reprise her role as sexy action hero Lara Croft in the latest Tomb Raider movie.

    Producer Dan Lins has confirmed he’ll be “rebooting” Lara Croft, but giving Ange the boot in favour of a younger, hotter star.

    “It’s a great story that we’re going to tell, very character-orientated and more realistic than the past movies,” he says. “It’s an origin tale so it’s going to be a younger Lara Croft.”

    Ange shot to A-list status after she starred in the first two Tomb Raider films in 2001 and 2003, but with the newest instalment written as a prequel – telling the story of Lara Croft’s early transformation to international woman of mystery – the part will go to a younger actress.

    Transformers star Megan Fox is tipped as the most likely choice but if she’s going to play a young Angelina, the 23-year-old will need to get over her phobia of the intimidating actress…

    “I’m actually frightened of her,” Megan revealed recently. “I haven’t had the opportunity to meet her and I try to avoid that because I’m afraid. Angelina’s a powerful person and I bet she would eat me alive

    Reply
  230. Lola said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:09 am

    I can only imagine how messed up that UGLY tat on her belly must look after carring twins, bet they cut the whole thing out when she had he tummy tuck.

    Reply
  231. Lola said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:15 am

    Wow that is sad about Gwen and Gavin, I really hate people that pop out kids but are to selfinsh and imature to be married and parents, gweN, Gavin, Brad, Angelins Jon Gosseling. People need to think before bring other human lives in their problems!!

    On a side not, the horse pics are discusting, I can not believe angelina srewed a horse, that is friggin sick, can not believe people l;et this mental case ADOPT children!!!

    What is wrong with the world??????

    Reply
  232. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:23 am

    Thank you dear, i’m not sure of the exact date when i will be admitted for the surgery, but it’s very soon. I do appreciate all the people who post here, i so enjoy reading the different takes on events, while like-kind knowledge of what a piece of chyt Angie actually is. If i could take a laptop to the hospital with me i would….just to keep all of you nearby….so, you have me for about another week i believe…. :-)
    @Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  233. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    I’d been hearing rumors that Gavin was bi and outright cheating on Gwen, but when i would see photos of them as a family attending Sunday morning Catholic church services, i just couldn’t make myself believe those rumors….i suppose actors/entertainers can portray any personality they wish….true or not@Ms Agatha:

    Reply
  234. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    Thank you so much for your well wishes….@justhelping:

    Reply
  235. Patty Anne said on June 5th, 2009 at 7:29 am

    Thank you Kate. I see my surgeon next Thursday for an admit date….i will be thinking of our mystery and passing time making lists which i love to do….lol@Kate:

    Reply
  236. sinker said on June 5th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    @ruby:
    not true – try being a bartender for a week or two.

    you will hear more intimate stories than you could imagine from total strangers — and not just from the tipsy ones. in fact, it seems to be easier for people to share intimate stories with complete strangers. also, some people are genius at getting others to talk about ANY thing. therapists do it all the time, and so do con artists.

    Reply
  237. Keane said on June 5th, 2009 at 9:45 am

    @ruby:

    As usual ruby your intelliigence just floors me, I am not worthy! Moving on!

    Reply
  238. chris said on June 5th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    what is that blackberry story ? i never heard of it ?

    Reply
  239. ladybert62 said on June 5th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Dang Patty Anne – that sounds SERIOUS! Hope you recover quickly and dont have any pain! I will rub my magic Angel Bracelet and try to direct good thoughts your way (cant guarantee any results as this Angel wish is coming from an atheist! – but, whatever works!). :P

    Reply
  240. harikari girl said on June 5th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    Being named by Forbes as the most powerful celebrity in the world obviously isn’t enough for Angelina Jolie. Apparently she decided to use her incredible journalistic talent to write for Time Magazine on Darfur and the ICC briefing to the United Nations Security Council…

    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1903006,00.html

    Reply
  241. Sesame said on June 5th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Do you mean the GQ interview american Idol that happened right as Jennifer started divorce proceedings?
    Or is there another quote?

    “Did you ever see the letters in the front of those magazines?” Pitt says, referring to the credulous, often sappy, sometimes chiding commentary from fans concerned about their favorite stars: Stay strong, Jen! We’re pulling for you! “This kills me. I’d understand if it’s about Rwanda that people have things to say, but to actually sit down and take an hour out of your life and, one, read something [about a celebrity] and absorb it as truth, and, two, be either moved or really outraged and comment on it…either way, it’s hilarious to me.”

    Perhaps, I say, although for people living dingy, difficult lives, possibly going through a divorce of their own, it’s remarkable to know that even someone like Brad Pitt can have a setback—that life can be tricky for us all. It brings perspective, and cosmic comfort.

    “You know what?” Pitt says. “That’s a great point. That explains the person writing in, actually. I stand corrected. If you wanna use my thing to make your thing a little better, have at it. I’m fine with it. Really.”

    Reply
  242. Sesame said on June 5th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    I am not sure I am buying the Gwen Gavin break up story. Their tours were booked at the same time. THey are dividing time with the kids for the duration of the tours. Gwen is a good girl from Anaheim. She only had two boyfriends Tony (in the band) and Gavin. They dated a long time before getting married. They weathered the illegitimate daughter popping up and her career skyrocketing while his took a hit. Before the tours they were always together and doing normal stuff like hanging at the beach with the kids and renting a cheesy bounce house for Kingston’s bday parties. I would be surprised if they weren’t pretty solid.

    Reply
  243. Ms Agatha said on June 5th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    @chris:

    Sorry, it took me only 24 hrs to answer you … but just got across your mail …lol
    I was talking about Entertainment Tonight editor’s phone call to Holly on her private phone number and receiving voice verification of the fact that the twins had been born as previous stated by email…. the editor knew Holly personally and had called her many times before on her private blackberry…. all that was later denied by AJ and BP PR machine : Somebody ‘ pretending ‘ to be Holly had answered the phone and given wrong info…… something smells like last week’s fish….

    Reply
  244. Ms Agatha said on June 5th, 2009 at 11:46 pm

    Somebody ‘pretending’ to be Holly had originally confirmed birth of twins weeks earlier than AJ would later admit.@chris:

    Reply
  245. chris said on June 6th, 2009 at 3:50 am

    @Ms Agatha:
    oh, this story, yeah i knew about it, thanks for answering.

    Reply
  246. Cazza said on June 6th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    Haha Keane talking politics. Amazing. Stick to gossip please because I don’t think you, explaining our political system is a good idea. You keep doing it. You are a Brownaloonie. GYAC. When Labour took over in 1997, you do realise that the economy was in VERY good health? Largest pension fund in Europe. 60 BILLION surplus in the accounts. Gold reserve? You do realise that your mate Brown then stuck to Tory spending till 2000 and then went mental? Sold off the gold when it was at its lowest. Pensions? All gone. Surplus? Nice try, gone. PFIs that have bankrupted my children’s children future? You do realise the gap between rich and poor is greater now than ever under a Tory government? Knee jerk reaction? How dare you post on here and speak for the British? I am an educated woman, in a good job and pay my taxes. Do you really think I want to read you telling people that somehow me voting Tory is kneejerk?

    Sit down Keane. Pick up a paper. Educate yourself. Don’t act like some expert on here.

    Reply
  247. Keane said on June 6th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @Cazza:

    Just as long as it’s owned by Rupert Murdoch hey? The highly esteemed Times that is doing a major piece on Britney Spears this week? Yes I can see where you get your politics from loud and clear! Sit down Cazza, take a chill pill and try to have an educated, informed, reasonable debate about things rather than the kneejerk reaction of outrage moulded by the right-wing press so many of the population of the UK is guilty of. It would make everything you say more credible and worthwhile. And yes dear of course I am a “Brownaloonie” because I don’t hate the man and don’t want to go running into the arms of the hapless Tories the moment times are hard. Its people like you who only understand the world in terms of black and white dichotomies that make it such a dangerous place. And where on earth did you think I was speaking for the whole of the UK? I was giving my assessment of the situation as you have done which seems to just be far too much for you to handle. Oh and dear, before you go telling people to “get an education”, it is probably worth checking where they got their education from and whether yours could possibly match up to it before trying to sound intellectually superior. I sense from the tone of your post that it wasn’t somewhere to shout about too much though. I’m sorry you didn’t feel capable of having a reasonable debate about these things, but that is obviously who you are.

    Reply
  248. mohamad said on December 26th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    thank you.please send wallpaper angelina jole
    from iran

    Reply
  249. penis enlargement said on January 29th, 2011 at 4:59 am

    It’s so hard to get backlinks these days, honestly i need a backlink by comments on your blog / forums or guestbook to make my website appear in search engine. I am getting desperate Now! I know you’ll laugh while reading this comment !!! Here is my website penis enlargement pills I know my comments do not relate to the topic, but PLEASE HELP ME!! APPROVING MY COMMENT!
    Regards: PoormanBH2011

    Reply
  250. [...] IUC Exclusive: Is Angie Considering Running for Office? Is She After Barry-O? Posted on June 3rd, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive Angie has told friends she

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

June 2009
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Meta