IUC World Exclusive: Prince Charles Not Harry’s Real Father; Ex Diana Lover Keeps Silents Because of Death Threats From Royal Family
Prince Harry is the toast of NYC this week. Throngs of folks have lined the streets of Manhattan to greet Britain’s popular prince with open arms. Little do they realize that Harry could soon be stripped of his royal title because he’s not the biological son of Prince Charles, an IUC investigation has revealed.
A longtime employee of Harry’s mother Princess Diana told IUC that the Royal Family was involved in a massive coverup to hide the fact that Diana’s ex lover James Hewitt is the Harry’s real father. According to the source Prince Philip threatened Hewitt’s life if he didn’t go along with the coverup. “They made him lie about the timeline,” the source told IUC. “Prince Philip told Hewitt he would destroy him if it ever leaked out. It’s impossible that Charles is Harry’s real father. Hewitt was on the scene as Diana’s lover two years before Harry was born. Diana stopped having sex with Charles years before Harry was born. Harry looks exactly like Hewitt.”
The massive coverup involved Hewitt lying to the world about when his dalliance actually began with Diana. Originally he told the world he met Diana in 1986. Harry was born in 1984. 
Under hypnosis for a tv interview Hewitt admitted he met Diana in 1981 or 1982, had sexual relations with her then – some two years before Harry was born. A relative of Hewitt told IUC that privately Hewitt has always believed he’s Harry’s dad but has denied it in public because he fears for his life. He also wants to protect his son from being dethroned.
“Bloody hell, Harry should call James his real father,” the relative said. “It’s the biggest lie in Britain since Neville Chamberlain assured the world some seven decades ago that Britain and Germany would never go to war. Prince Philip told James he’d kill him if he ever admitted the truth. That’s why he keeps denying it.”
The relative added that this is another example of why the Royal Family should be abolished. “They’re the biggest crooks and liars in the world,” he said. “All the evidence clearly demonstrates that James is Harry’s real father. Just the way they killed Diana they’ll kill James. You’ll see, one day his body will be found mysteriously in a hotel room and the Royals will try to convince the world that James committed suicide.” Devleoping…
- 97 Comments
- Tags: James Hewitt, Prince harry
i suspected this from the very beginning…anyway, i like prince harry despite everything…there is something adorable about him that makes him more appealing than prince william
Replybb14. We in Australia have known that for years that James Hewitt is the Father of Prince Harry. But he always avoided the question and never really answered truthfully.
ReplyIt couldn’t be more obvious that Hewitt is Harry’s father, however I am dubious about the Prince Phillip threatened to kill him part which is why he keeps quiet. I always thought he kept quiet to protect Harry and his royal status rather than anything else. I never believed the conspiracy theory that the Royal Family were responsible for Diana’s death. I know certain members of the royal family, particularly the Queen and Prince Pip think duty and upholding the values and status of the royal family are more important than anything, but more important than their grandsons having a mother? I have difficulty in believing they would go to such lengths just to maintain the image of the monarchy. Plus we live in a democracy and the Queen and Prince Pip do not exert any real power. They should not have the power to order a murder. If they do then that is outrageous and it must be exposed and the Queen dethroned. I have never believed they have this power, although I have to say what went on around the time of Paul Burrell going on trial for stealing Diana’s personal effects was most bizarre and did make me wonder. The Queen suddenly stepping in at the last minute to say she recalled she did have a conversation with Burrell about the items and gave him permission to take them but had previously forgotten it. If there ever was a more blatant-sounding lie I have never heard it, and yet this was considered fine by the police and the case was dropped. I can’t imagine a non-royal citizen exerting the power to have a trial dropped just because they “remembered a conversation they had previously forgotten”. It was all very suspect. And of course it sounded very much like Burrell had some info on Diana or the royal family that he could have exposed and they did it to keep him quiet. So effectively, while she was never put on trial – she constitutionally can’t be – I believe she lied to the legal system to cover something up. If she had been in the witness stand it would have been perjury.
ReplyI still think he shares a nose with Charles. No matter what Charles raised him as his own so that makes him dad, just like Pitt and his litter.
ReplyYes well, its a bit different when there is a royal lineage involved. I mean, Pitts kids won’t inherit his acting “throne” will they? He is third in line to be the King of England, that is a BIG deal if he isn’t Charles’ son. Of course anyone who knows their English history know that there has been 1000’s of years worth of illegitimate children, murder, mayhem, entitilement etc. The Queen believes that she was chosen by GOD not the people, she has an innate sense of entitlement to her throne, way beyond the boundaries of lineage. Queen Elizabeth ! was the product of Henry VIII and Ann Boleyn, which many people claim was an illegitimate birth because he divorced his wife to marry her. In fact, he broke with Rome, denounced his catholic relighion and formed te Church of England precisely so he could marry her. Of course thats all ancient history; in present day there are people who would become King before Harry if it were to be discovered that he is the illegitimate son (if Charles and William were to die suddenly). Having said all that, I truly believe the Monarchy should be disbanded upon QE’s death.
Reply@Keane:
ReplyAgree about the paternity of Prince Harry, however, it should not be overlooked that just like the USG, the monarchy has a long and bloody history. While HRH may be painted in the press as a neutered, kindly old lady, a figurehead more than else, by her own admission in a widely read quote to Paul Burrell by the Queen, ‘there are dark forces at work”. Note that Burrell is not exactly a pristine source of information either as he clearly had and has his own agenda building his own fortune and fame on the back of Diana’s death. She (HRH) is not powerless. It is just as saying that the US President is powerless without congress. It is simply untrue. It will well known to all that Philip is a big prick and generally unlikable guy so I don’t doubt the death threats either. What I do doubt is that Diana was murdered for dating a Muslim (Dodi Fayed). Muslim integration into British culture is a fact. I believe at one time recently the most popular boy name in the UK was Mohammed. IF there is a murder conspiracy surrounding Diana’s death/murder, I do not believe it is related to Diana dating a Muslim man. It is easy for all of us to be lulled into the story that the media paints about public and political figures, just as we laugh over some of the ridiculous press we read about AJ/BP. My point is that governments assassinate. Regardless of what the media tells us. Regardless of leaving princes motherless. The queen serves at the leisure of the royal bankers. Just like the US president.
@Caribsmom:
ReplyHarry’s paternity will NOT be made public other than to poo poo speculation about it. Regardless of what it is. That is how governments and government controlled media handle truthtellers/aka conspiracy theorists. They lump them/us in with all kinds of other crazies (UFOS FIXED MY TOASTER!!!!!) to ridicule and discredit them. Then, years later it all comes out, when the public attention has moved elsewhere.
The royals should be disbanded if they are just for show and according to the loons the JP’s are american royality. I have no idea what the Queen does or doesn’t do but most think she represents England just like third world Countries think movie stars represent us.
ReplyRead back thru your history books and you will find this sort of thing has occured over and over in the royal families of Europe. Being “next in line” didn’t necessarily guarantee you would actually succeed to the throne. Which proves to me at least, though wearing a crown, they remaind mortal human beings. One doesn’t necessarily need to be the sprem donor to be a father, and sometimes keeping a secret of linage is best for all concerned. Prince Harry had a wonderful, loving, caring, gracuious mother….the Royals have raise Prince Harry with his brother Prince William, so they both are on equal turf that way. I say, let him be. He is his mother’s son.
ReplyPrince Harry and his uncle James Spencer, Diana’s brother:
Replyhttp://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/cleogirlbird/_38269492_hewitt300.jpg
A “photo” of a young Earl Spencer , Diana’s father, Prince Harry’s maternal grandfather
http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/cleogirlbird/edwardspencer1924.jpg
The first picture is of a young Earl Edward Johnny Spencer, Diana’s father. James Hewitt bears a strong resemblance to a young Johnny Spencer.Perhaps that is why Diana was attracted to “The Love Rat.” Unfortunately for Harry,he happens to look like a Spencer,like his aunts,grandfather and uncle.And to add to this is the fact that Hewitt looks like a Spencer.And,then Hewitt first says he met Diana after Harry’s birth;but,then he’s paid money to be hypnotized(which makes any statement less credible,the subconscious is not a reliable memory source,something I learned many years ago in graduate school for Education and Psychology)and come out with a much earlier date for the beginning if the affair…no wonder people’s tongues are wagging!But,I chose to believe Hewitt’s first statement–that he started the affair with Diana after Harry was born;Diana was not a totally stupid woman and knew of the importance of presenting Charles with an heir and a spare before embarking on affairs of her own.She was in love with Charles and really tried hard to make the marriage work until after Harry’s birth;then,she just gave in and tried to live the aristocratic lifestyle of spouse and “friends on the side.”
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070606031528AARg0Tz
@Constant Gardner:Oh I totally agree with you!! We, the public only know what “they” want to tell us, there is so much more going on then anyone will ever know. I’ve heard it said that the entire world is run by something like 10 people and that all these presidents, monarchy etc are just figureheads to the real world powers that be. I tend to lean toward believing that theory actually.
I also agree that the truth about Harry’s paternity will NEVER see the light of day, if it is in fact true, which Im not totally convinced it is. I DO remain convinced however that the time for the disabling of the Monarchy is upon us and that their days on the throne are limited. Or maybe that’s just wishful thinking! hahaha
ReplyI think Prince Harry looks a lot like Diana’s brother, Earl Charles Spencer.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01097/earlspencer460_1097246c.jpg
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5936/spencerscp468×326.jpg
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/6562/1157.jpg
ReplyThe only Queen I loved in this family was the Queen Mother, who was queer friendly. The rest of them are a bunch of pigs. Te Amo, SRRC
Reply@Ray Catone:Really? Didn’t you love Prince Edward? I thought HE was the biggest queen of all, and Wallis Simpson his KING LOL
ReplyWell I’ll go even farther and say the Royals aren’t even British! I mean, they don’t act at all like the British people in that documentary “Mary Poppins” that I seen on the tv – none of the men in the family is a dancing chimney sweep, and I’ve never once seen the Queen curtsy and say “allo guv’na!”.
Really though, isn’t this just an empirical question? DNA tests are publicly available and within the reach of most tabloid budgets ($400-$2,000 for a paternity test*), and they can be done using hair. So, why doesn’t someone just obtain some of his hair, and the hair of another member of the Royals, and test them? People leave hair everywhere, in hotels, the trash, at the barber, on their clothes, etc., where you could get it . . . maybe there are privacy laws against this though? Blimey!
*http://www.americanpregnancy.org/prenataltesting/paternitytesting.html
Reply@ KEANE – Hey Hun, I left this message for you on the Angie dead by 36 post, but wanted to make sure you got it, so here it is again:
Caribsmom said on May 31st, 2009 at 10:50 am
ReplyAwwwww Keane!! Poor sweetie. Don’t let these haters get you down! It must be so hard to come on here and find yourself the target of this hate! Sometimes it makes me so mad when I read some of their crap against you that I just want to shout SHUT UP! Gawd! Leave the poor girl alone. Its so unfair. You handle it well, I couldn’t do the same. I wonder sometimes if you are going to say F**k it, and never come back. But I think I speak for the majority of us when I say please don’t get discouraged, you aren’t alone, and I’d say 99% of us really appreciate your thoughts and opinions, so just in case you were thinking about it, don’t leave us just because of the random assholes! We love you!! xoxoxoxo
@I’m on the bidet:LOL Funneeeeeeee!!
Reply@keane. Er.. no you are wrong. Mohammed was never the most popular name here. That has been Jack for years now. Mohammed was like 12th or something. The Hewitt story is so old. I am surprised it is being dragged up again. But (I am a Brit btw from London) Earl Spencer was ginger, he brother is a ginger as are her two sisters. So the story that this is somehow proof he is Hewitt’s boy is a bit far fetched. Not saying it isn’t possible but I am surprised this is being dragged up again. I like Harry. And I like the Queen. And for all you saying Philip is a bastard, you clearly do not get the Brits. He is amazing, with his insults and sarky comments. It has made us laugh for years now, even if it is close to the bone (which it frequently is).
Reply@Caribsmom:I think it’s been floated that Queen Victoria was not a product of the royal marriage. The hemophaelia popped up through her, but no previous royals had it.
Reply@Different Guest: In re to Harry being illegitimate and not eligible for the throne, none of William IV children were legitimate and the throne passed to Victoria at a very young age. Her mother was Regent until Victoria became of age.
From Wikipedia:
ReplyVictoria was born in Kensington Palace in 1819. Her uncle, William IV was the father of ten illegitimate children by his mistress, the actress Dorothy Jordan, but had no surviving legitimate children. As a result, the young Princess Victoria became heiress presumptive.
you guys are a friggin riot!
ReplyIan give it a break. Charles is his father. Harry has Charle’s distinctive looking ears, his mouth and his nose. The only thing he has in common with Hewitt is red hair and a fair complexion – which also could have come from the Spencer side. You just love stirring up scandal so you can get hits on your site. Seriously Mr. Undercover–check out adult pictures of Harry and Charles side-by-side. Ears, mouth, nose–the same.
ReplyI should clarify that IF Harry is illegitimate, and it became public knowledge, not saying he IS, just IF
ReplyThis is hardly a world exclusive. Google it, its all right there. The published rumors go back litteraly decades! Story is so old in fact that one of Dianas friends, to end the rumors, stated that both boys were DNA tested at birth and proven to be fathers by Charles. This is the royal family for goodness sake.
ReplyAw thanks Caribsmom that is so nice of you! And yeah the planted haters and random knobs do get a bit annoying at times but I now find it more funny than anything else. Funny that Ange’s people think anything I say here matters enough to go after me all the time, funny that knobs like chancesare & UFB can’t stop talking about me even when I’m not posting & funny that people care enough about what I say to discuss it and me on other sites. Get a life people! And they think we’re obsessed with Brange! I’m only not posting so much right now cos summer has hit the UK so I’m lapping it up, but don’t worry I will not be bullied away by the freaks. It just makes me all the more determined to keep posting just to spite them! If they truly wanted me to go away the best thing they could do would be to leave me alone, then I might get bored & not post so much. Ange & her minions have only made me want to post more since this blog started cos I find their behaviour so hilarious. As for knobs like the likes of chancesare & UFB well all I can say is men with small pricks will always need to find another way to feel big. For those two schmucks, its thinking they’re witty on the internet. What can you do when you can’t get laid though. I feel sorry for the poor little blighters!x
Reply@Caribsmom:She was heir presumptive because she was supposedly the “legitimate” child of William’s younger brother, who predeceased him.
Replythis rumor has been swirling for years. he does look like Hewitt so it wouldn’t surprise me, but Charles has raised him so I would give him the nod as “Dad”. there have also been a lot of rumors over the years about Prince Philip. it sounds like he’s quite the bastard so I would have no problem believing that he threatened Hewitt or had Diana taken care of. the lengths they will go to protect the ‘establishment’ are quite scary.
my mom’s a royal family freak so I’ve heard it all.
ReplyIan, with all due respect, I’d rather have a “Harry expose week” than a Michelle O week! I just adore Harry; he is most handsome and he seems like a riot to be around. I think the press have given him a hard time. I’m sure the royal family have more juicy secrets than the Obamas! Or maybe I just care about them more!
Reply@keane:Yea I heard summer has arrived. My Mother In Law in Glenrothes Scotland told me they are having a heat wave and she just can’t get used to it LOL Thats why we never had her to our house in Florida LOL Our daughter lives in Brighton and she and her pals are charging the beach, she says she’s really brown! Unfortunately, knowing England it could be cold and raining next week so enjoy it will you can! LOL PS – does your local pub do a BBQ in the garden on Sundays? Our local in Birchington did a great BBQ, was always a blast and it doesnt get dark til like 11:00 pm, loved it!!
ReplyGood afternoon! Kiev Girl information there. for men men. Your Kyivska prostitute Rybka. You can visit my blog.
ReplyKeane — I agree with you wholoeheartedly that the Queen is by far not just a figurehead, but instead, I believe, one of the top rulers among the Royal Banker establishment. And yes, Governments commit murder quite frequently — although, I don’t believe Princess Di is dead, however, I believe her supposed death was actually faked and agreed to by the Queen and Diana, both, plus Dodi and his dad. Prince Harry is not Charles’ son by blood, but I don’t believe this is a problem for the Royals due to at least 1/4 of the Royals are not genetically tied to their “so called” birth parents — yet through history, they maintain Royal status.
ReplyRight – Harry was born in 84, so she got pregnant in 83, and her and Charles hadnt had sex for years – they only married in 81!
ReplyThis is crap – Harry looks / looked EXACTLY like Dianas sisters son. At her funeral I couldnt work out how Harry was walking behind the coffin, and then was inside the Abbey with his aunt – I had to do a double take when I realised it was his cousin. He is a Spencer. As Patty Anne has shown, Hewitt happens to look a bit like a Spencer.
James Hewitt wrote a book, and since then has pretty much lived off his reLationship with Diana, but has always denied he is the father!
It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if Harry was the child of James Hewitt. I adore the young son, who seems to carry his mother’s free spirit. I think Diana was a beautiful and tragic soul who did love her husband and found out that love was not reciprocated. Then she had those beautiful sons and found all the love she needed in life (well, maybe a fling here and there, a girl’s got needs, ha.) May the beautiful Diana rest in peace.
Reply@Knowone:
ReplyI second that !
I third it! Diana was so very special, she touched the hearts of people universally. The loss of Diana was more than the royalty realized i think. She brought them into the 21 century, and showed a compassion no other royal has. Charles had a real treasure and insted lusted after fool’s gold. I would hate to see Camilla become Queen of England, or even Royal Consort….it would be like a slap in the face to Diana whom the Queen took the title from thus removing her protection. We might still have Diana but for that. IMO as an American who grew to love Princess Diana@karenab:
Reply@Sandy:
ReplyROFLMAO I hope youre kidding.
bb14. I bet the source was Paul Burrell. He is always spilling his guts about Princess Di. He made quite a bit of money cashing in on her. JMO
Reply@Caribsmom:
Replybb14. I am with you. Australia comes under the Queens commonwealth. I have never been a fan of the Monachy and never will be. I believe how they treated Diana was shameful especially on the day of her funeral. We have had the Queen and Phillip out here many times to open Parliament and things like that. It is a waste of the taxpayers money and that is who pays for her visits out here. Thank God she will not be coming here anymore. Apparently the trip from London is too far for her to travel. We here in Australia are about 25 hours by air from London. The quicker we go Republic the better. King Charles and Queen Camilla I THINK NOT
Harry looks like Diana’s brother. Red hair is a Spencer trait as is Harry’s coloring and complexion.
About The Royal Family ordering a hit on Diana? That’s so idiotic in light of what we know happened. Diana was killed alright but not by The Royal Family but by the drunken driver Henri Paul hired by Diana’s then bf Dodi Fayed to drive them both around France that fateful weekend culminating in the crash in the Paris tunnel and Diana’s death.
ReplySlow weekend eh? This bit is totally ridiculous….
Reply@keane:Foul mouthed twat.
Reply@benjaminbutton14:Honey, it ain’t happening any time soon … not with K-Rudd the Monarchist as PM. Kevin wants to be king, why would he abolish the system that will support him? Australia is a commonwealth country as is Canada Ian, watch your mouth, and will be for some time.
BTW – this story is so fucking old I can’t believe …. nay. It’s completely believable that Ian’s cronies would believe it – keep drinking the green drank or as an alternate to having the whole
ReplyInternet laughing at you…. DO YOUR RESEARCH people.
@benjaminbutton14:Oh. Please grow up. You sound like a bogan skippy who only made it to year 7.
Reply@Cazza: What is a ginger?
Reply@Susanna: I’m dreading the Michelle O expose. I find her dull. Plus she resembles the grinch in most of her pictures. What is there to expose? We heard all the possibles during the election run up. BORING>
Reply@I’m on the bidet:
ReplyThey are not British. They are Austrian and German-the name Windsor was only taken and the name Saxe Gothe or whatever the hell it was, was eliminated for fear of anti German sentiment. Philip is Greek.
He looks enough like his father for me to say BULLSHIT. I mean other than coloring, he really does look like Prince Charles, only not as UGLY…And if Dianna had Gingies in her fam…. Case closed…He’s Chas’s brat. Next fake story please….(it’s like cartoons here)….
ReplyThe story is full of bullocks and has no real merritt. Why on earth would someone make such a stupid story. I think Prince Harry does have some resemblance to Prince Charles. They both have that rosey check complexion and they both have similar ear shapes.
Reply@ Keane – I agree with her totally. First of all, why on EARTH would anyone degrade Diana’s son. Diana was already ‘degraded’ by the ‘Royal Family’. We ALL know that family from down from ‘history’ is ALL about incest. No one can argue about this to me. Then, beautiful, Henry, Diana’s son (as well as William) is castigrated, because of WHAT??? Because, Charles, the weakling, ‘LIMP DICK,’ cannot BUCK UP! Why on earth would he EVER be the KING?? He won’t, but those a-holes want to take Harry down.
Reply@N’other Name:
ReplySorry (sp) castigated! Typing too fast for any typo check! xo
That was priceless. Nothing like accusing someone of being foul-mouthed and then peppering your own posts with “c*nts” and “fucks” – makes perfect sense! How could everything you’ve said be held in anything other than high regard after that?! Lol. BTW Brits do swear a lot, much more than Americans, we use swear words for emphasis and humour a lot. Lighten up c*ntface! Ha ha ha.
Reply@keane:
ReplyUhmm… Were you talking to me??? ‘Cause when I said in my post @ 12:51 am and said @ Keane “I agree totally w/ her…”, I meant I agreed with you, not ’so & so’. So, I’m doing a little giggle here but I sincerely hope that I’m not the ‘c*ntface’ to whom you are referring. Yikes
I think Harry looks more like Prince Charles as he gets older, especially around the eyes. I guess everyone’s failed to notice Diana’s family are ginger, including her brother.
Ian you are a total cunt. This site is the nastiest most spiteful vindicative place on the net right now. And how is it these faceless anons are queuing up to talk to you? My guess: Bull. Shit. And lots of it.
Reply@N’other Name:
No no, I was responding to the elegantly titled “twat means C*nt you know”!!!! Lol. Sorry when I post on my blackberry the reply function doesn’t work for some reason or maybe I hit the wrong one – sorry! No, sweetheart I would never call you or anybody else a “c*ntface”, I’m not a huge fan of that word! Was just responding to the charming poster above who accused me of being foul-mouthed – ha ha!
Reply@egm:
Woah there we go with another c word, and in all its glory too now, how hilarious, it must be the word of the day! Methinks some people must be getting a wee bit rattled by Ian – ha ha!
Reply@Keane:
ReplyFunny, Keane! And, yeah, going back to the prior posts that, apparently, is the word of the day/night whatever. Have a great one today!!!
ummmm you have attracted a new bunch of idiots, and they just get nicer!
Sorry Ian but I think us brits have heard enough of this over the years. I thought he was Hewitts but as Harry gets older he does now look like charles – so no I am unsure…. If Hewitt is his Dad, Diana would have done everything to humilate Charles with this information, one way or another. The fact that she didnt and not even Burrel has hinted, (I dont think, dont listen to the jerk) makes me think he is Charles Diana was unstable and no matter what the royal court wanted, she would have done what she wanted, regardless. Some could argue that Diana would never say anything to protect Harry, but its William who is Heir to the throne, another reason I think people dont really care about Harry.
And as powerful and manipulative as people think the royals maybe, they are not powerful and I doubt they will try and have anyone killed to cover this up, these antics are part of the their royal lives, always have been, always will be.
ReplyJMO, mine alone.
@Liin:
ReplyHey, this is JMO about this – and I respect yours – however, I believe that (whatever about Diana’s psyche) she would never have ‘thrown Harry under the bus’ per se. I do believe she was a devoted mother and she ended up in the worst ‘effed’ up family in the world. But I do not believe that she would have humiliated Charles at Harry’s expense. ‘Cause I do believe that, at the beginning, she really loved Charles. However, Diana was the one that they ’screwed’. And, from my viewpoint Harry is SOOOO much better looking than Charles EVER was. So, don’t take offence to my opinion – but Harry hit the US recently and everyone is just ‘fawning’ ALL over him, not only because he is good looking but, apparently, a great guy. This was HUGE news over here. So, once again, JMO.
Hmmm…. I think we’re in need of another post, ideally a Brangelina-based one. Got anything up your sleeve for us Ian?
Replythe only thing that keeps me from believing this is that Harry looked exactly like Charles as a little kid.
Reply@Keane:
ReplyOh GAWD Yes, anytime now, Ian!
@Constant Gardner:
ReplyWoman’s Day magazine is saying today that they are seperated.
Off topic.
If your’e interested, check out HuffingtonPost.com today. There’s an interesting write-up about how
The “Church” of Scientology obtained exempt status from the United States Internal Revenue Service.
Not all the double-speak from the cult officials.
Reply@Keane:
Replybb14. Excellent idea. Brangelina will do it every time.
@magnolia:
Replybb14. If you are referring to the Australian Womans Day, I have posted that, but I think it was old news. Some=one said that the same was in Star in 2007. So who knows
@benjaminbutton14:
ReplyI don’t know which it is. A friend told me about it, but I’m going to be bummed if isn’t the current “state of affairs”.
Mother of mercy is there nothing happening in Hollywood?
Reply@Alif:
ReplyWhy does one type in the correct spelling of a letter; yet it comes out as a typo. So, here’s the proper
structure of the last sentence: Note all the double-speak from the cult officials.
@keane:
ReplyYes, there’s a saying about those kind of men. I hesitate to say it but will. They call it “small d– k behaviour”
And that’s typical of BP, imo!
@N’other Name:
No offence taken at all, these is how a blog should work, everyone with their own opinions, getting along fine. x
ReplyC’mon… EVERYONE knows that Hewitt is the father. It’s not even a real secret. But who cares? All through history, there are examples of illegitimate children. Common decency prevents us from making it a big deal. Move along, folks, and find some REAL news for a change…
ReplyTake a good look at the Royal Familie in Danmark and you would se the same picture. They younger brother Joachim does not have the same father as Frederik. Do I care? not really the do a bad job whomever there father is..
Reply@twat means C*nt you know:
bb14. What the hell is your problem??
Reply@magnolia:
Replybb14. It was in the issue just out this Monday 1/6/09. Apparently the same type story was in The Star back in 2007 some-one has posted. But I feel it is up to date as it has hit other magazines as well.
@Sandy:
Replybb14. From what I have read and believe The Queen and Prince Phillip are 2nd cousins.
Of course Harry’s father is hewitt and of course they killed/disappeared Diana. The royal family are one of the biggest criminal families known to man and they are german immigrants. No Power? You are having a laugh. They are members of the REAL world powers and need to be arrested or hung as soon as possible. Elitists are scum and the royals are near the very tip of corruption and antihumanitarianism. They do nothing for Britain and are nothing to Britain, and Britain isn’t really the name of our country. Parasitical scum along with the bankers, ministers, lords, judiciary, police, army, councils, doctors and civil service employee’s. The whole caboodle is going to be dismantled, like it or not. Educate yourself on what is really going on in the world, otherwise you are soon to face an awful shock.
ReplyYour right about Harry and his father is not Charles. Also, did you know that William is a clone from the Shroud of Turin so he didn’t father William either. Did Charles ever consumate his marriage with Dianna????
ReplyThanks for the parroting insight dear you know what happened your’ve read it somewhere in a controlled media ragtrade….a media that is as investigative as yourself Sara.
ReplyImpossible to get rid of monarchy, they are at the head of the shadow world government along with red shield and rock en felder. They are the national socialists who run the rest and all of us, meek and mild they are not.
ReplyJIuAt6 comment2 ,
ReplyI heard that for a child to be red-haired both parents must carry the red-hair gene. Diana’s family obviously have the gene. Charles’s family dosn’t. Neither Philip or Elizabeth have red hair or come from red-haired families. Work it out for yourselves.
ReplyWOW this is so stupid!
ReplyHARRY AND CHARLES HAVE THE EXACT SAME EYES!!
Is this just cause hewitt has red hair? Cause that is even more stupid! Red hair usually skips a generation, most red head kid’s parents dont have red hair!
I do believe Prince Charles is the father of Prince William. Although Prince William very much resembles his mother, Princess Diana, he has Prince Charles and Prince Philip’s bald spot. Just an observation.
Replyhe’s still damn hot. chewing tobacco was that you?
ReplyRegarding Prince Philip threatening Hewitt.A recent British TV documentary about the late Princess Margarete’s (The Queen’s sister) friendship/alleged affair with London Gangster/Actor John Bindon revealed that Bindon was once threatened by British Intelligence and was told he would “disappear” if he ever spoke about the alleged affair in public.Bindon was a tough guy who feared no-one but the incident rattled him and he took it seriously.
Reply@Constant Gardner:
ReplyIf you want to refer to the title of the Queen you should use the correct one! Royal princes are given the title of HRH – His/Her Royal Highness. The Monarch has the title of HM – Her/His Majesty. I am tired of these titles being used incorrectly. It probably indicates how little these people know of royalty. Probably they are republicans. I am a New Zealander and Queen Elizabeth remains our monarch. We have recently re-introduced royal honorary titles of Sir and Dame so rightly or wrongly, we will remain a monarchy for some time yet. Certainly, I won’t see New Zealand as a republic. Personally, I am a royalist.
Prince Harry was born in 1984, seven years before Diana met James Hewitt – such lack of due diligence simply makes a mockery of the real deal and gets people off chasing white rabbits.
ReplyWhat is far more fascinating is that Williams was born on the Summer soltice in 1982, hailed as the year for the return of the Christ by Creme. Some of my Jewish friends tell me that the Rabbi’s know the identity of Messiah but are waiting for the right time – maybe 2012 when Wills reaches 30, or 2015 when he is 33. What really makes me giggle is that he will in all probability become both head of the Church of England, and 13th member of the cash coven of the City of London, and head of world Freemasonry. The press, especially Murdoch, has anointed him King of the World – it is only a matter of time before the situation comes to its fulfillment, but never fear, that is about when a counter revolution of Christ carriers will bring the kingdom to earth in the most powerful outpouring of the Holy Spirit ever.
Remember, there can never be a counterfeit without an original.
Replyoops, I of course meant WILLS – or WILLIAM WALES, or WILLIAM MOUNTBATTENBERG or whatever his name really is – the one who will serve the Red Dragon of Wales
ReplyPlenty of guys, royals and commmoner get cuckolded, and they pretend that the love children of their Jezebel wife are their own. Nothing different here, Prince Charles has raised the son of Captain James Stewart, as his own. Harry will never be king, however.
Reply@bluiznsmilez:
Replyi just have one comment on the subject. for the longest time i would watch michele o and wonder you or what she looked like.
the grinch it is. thank you
All of you need to get a life I don’t care who the Father is. He also might look like you . Prince Charles as been his dad all his life.and Yes Prince Charles needs to grow up. Camilla she is another story she is not a mother to the boys and she will never be.Diana never treated William or Harry bad and never talk bad about the boys dad.Remember Charles was her first love.And for all your gossip magazine you need to stop the lies and try the truth for once in you life. that is why I won’t buy any magazines when I go shopping I won’t even pick one up. So in ending get a life. leave Charles William and Harry alone
Replyand as for Camilla You need to pack it up and go after some who cares Charles should keep his pants on and you should just leave. The only reason you married Charles was you wanted to Be Queen . Let me set you straight you are NOT Queen will NEVER be QUEEN. And as for Queen Elizabeth you have made up your mind and Never Change it . Charles is not ready he wants to play around and England doesn’t need a player they need a man and that looks to me like Prince Wiloliam is it
All of you need to get a life I don’t care who the Father is. He also might look like you . Prince Charles as been his dad all his life.and Yes Prince Charles needs to grow up. Camilla she is another story she is not a mother to the boys and she will never be.Diana never treated William or Harry bad and never talk bad about the boys dad.Remember Charles was her first love.And for all your gossip magazine you need to stop the lies and try the truth for once in you life. that is why I won’t buy any magazines when I go shopping I won’t even pick one up. So in ending get a life. leave Charles William and Harry alone
Replyand as for Camilla You need to pack it up and go after some who cares Charles should keep his pants on and you should just leave. The only reason you married Charles was you wanted to Be Queen . Let me set you straight you are NOT Queen will NEVER be QUEEN. And as for Queen Elizabeth you have made up your mind and Never Change it . Charles is not ready he wants to play around and England doesn’t need a player they need a man and that looks to me like Prince William is it
And I am the father of Prince William.
Reply[...] Source: ianundercover [...]
[...] More here [...]
[...] drivel: Another disturbing IUC "exclusive" about Angelina Jolie IUC: Brad Pitt in rehab IUC World Exclusive: Prince Charles Not Harry’s Real Father; Ex Diana Lover Keeps Silents Beca… IUC Exclusive: Sudanese Model Travels to Cannes to Confront Brad Pitt IUC Exclusive: Champ Tyson [...]