IUC exclusive (1st of Two Brangie Blockbusters This Week): Angie avoids backlash over ignoring her children‏

Posted on May 25th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

 

 

A key element to Angelina Jolie’s remarkable image makeover from
heroin addicted, incestuous bad girl to media-canonized Saint has
always been her public image as a model mother. My sources in camp
Angie have long noted that she spends virtually no time with the
children and leaves them with nannies almost 24/7, unless she needs
them for a photo op.

But IUC has learned that Jolie’s public relations team long ago
devised a cleverly orchestrated strategy to deflect attention from
this apparent double standard.

“Every time Angie is set to sign on for another movie,” said one
employee, “she is instructed to tell a trusted reporter that she
plans to soon retire from acting or drastically cut back her schedule
so that she can spend more time with her kids. That way she avoids a
potential backlash from reporters who might criticize her for being
away from her family so much of the time. It’s brilliant. If those
reporters ever heard the kids call their nanny “Mommy,” which has
happened more than once, they’d get the real picture.”

  1. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Oh okay. Well, this is common knowledge, we ALL know she promises to cut back on her workload after she just finishes this ONE MORE movie commitment. Yawn.

    Reply
  2. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Yes, we’ve all heard Angie use this ploy more than once. It’s a shame about the children though.

    Reply
  3. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Those poor little buggers… :(

    Yeah, more than once I’ve seen her say that and thought to myself, “Looks like she’s signed onto another film”.

    Reply
  4. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Ian – is THIS the BIGGEST STORY YET??? Cant be, can it??

    Reply
  5. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    For anyone from the other thread thats interested here is a link to the meaning of all AJ’s tatoos. Just ignore if you’ve already seen this.
    http://angiesrainbow.com/site/tatouages_ang.php

    Reply
  6. ffleur said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    of course a smart reporter would write about how times she promised to cut back and didn’t. That would get around AJ’s strategy.

    Reply
  7. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    I’m with you on that, some of the blockbusters seem to be more like cubebusters.

    Reply
  8. d said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    really this was what you weren’t sure you could post until the lawyers cleared it……seriously ? SERIOUSLY ??

    Reply
  9. HisHighness said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    part II coming soon – this was an appetizer.

    Reply
  10. d said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    @HisHighness:
    more like a crumb……this is starting to …..well get boring…..back to CDAN i go. Drunk Enty today !!

    Reply
  11. sama said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Ok Ian we will see it soon (i hope) :.)

    Reply
  12. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    @HisHighness:Laughs! Thanks Ian, can’t wait to see the Entree! xoxoxoxo MUAW

    Reply
  13. chris said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    seriously ? is that the biggest brangie story ? we all noticed that by ourselves, that’s why we came here in the first place. i feel really frustrated. that’s how it must look like after sex with pitt.

    Reply
  14. Outsider said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Big surprise, Angie loves Angie. Good thing she can pay others to love her kids. /sigh

    Reply
  15. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Roasted wild boar sized main course? With heaps of mashed potatoes? Promise? LOL

    Reply
  16. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Does this means the lawyers still have not given you the green light?

    Reply
  17. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Wonder if this means the second part of the blockbuster has to do with children? Maybe she’s pregnant. yikes.

    Reply
  18. sama said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    She is not pregnant, in Cannes she was drinking and what else she does ….. if she were pregnant then she wouldn’t have done that….

    Reply
  19. Littleenglander said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    I think the second part IS a monster. Ian’s teasing us…But please if she really is pregnant I will f* explode and swear ofF all gossip sites and newspapers, but I just COULD NOT BEAR ANOTHER NINE MONTHS OF SAINT ANGIE OCTOMOTHER SUPREME.

    Reply
  20. kick said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Hi HH! What ever happened to the Sudanese Model who was supposed to tackle bp at Cannes? What ever happened to bp being in rehab? What ever happened to aj’s female lover telling all?
    There are nothing but teasers on this website. And when there is “meat” in the story, it’s something that we already know.
    I’m sad because I had great faith in this site.

    Reply
  21. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    @cuze:
    When I first read this my first thought was, the law yers had not cleared him yet, his posters are all expecting something, it is Monday afternoon, so to keep the calm , IAN posted somthing from his book. I would hope with the drugs she is on and the drinking she was doing at Cannes she is not pregnant. I think right now what most people are interested in is the split, and it is interesting that all the other publications are jumping on the story and not letting up. The one about Brad being detemined to prove they are good for the good of the children does not ring true to me. If so, he could have given a different answer to Ann Curry, and he did not. He knew when he did that it was stir things up, just as he knows he is stirring things up with the necklace. Brad plans, he knows what he is doing. Mad is probably googling, but it would be hard to imagine that they have not told him at least by now what is going on. jmo

    Reply
  22. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @kick:
    Hi Kick, how are you? You know IAN is going to be releasing a book on them this year right? He is not going to tell all of that on the website. He is just putting it out there, getting the reactions to it, fine tuning it if you will, double checking, crossing t’s, dotting i’s. I understand your frustration, he did label this as the biggest brange story ever, so everyone is expecting something really really big. Let’s give him a little time on this.

    Reply
  23. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Littleenglander:
    If she is pregnant, would that really be a blockbuster or a monster story, I mean it is the norm for her and what people expect, so what would the big deal be about it, even if it is not Brads, no one can really prove that, just like right now we don’t know for sure which of the bio’s are his. I don’t think this it the story, that would just be another , ‘oh shit” lol

    Reply
  24. HisHighness said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    Sudanese Sister pissed off at Brangie – coming soon.

    Reply
  25. joanne said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    Since I became disabled I have extra time on my hands. After watching the media about celebs and politics I have no use for reporters, they seem money hungry and star struck with faux news being one of the worst. If people would get the stars out of their eyes they would notice she isn’t able to be a good mother due to acting, interviews and traveling all over the world. I find it very disgusting that she is allowed to adopt and belong to the un. ianundercover seems to want to open eyes and I truly hope he succeeds. It narrows down to when I want some truth in politics I go to The Daily Show and the Colbert Report and when it comes to gossip I go to dlisted and ianundercover. We need good reporters back in the media. Call me crazy but it seems whoever has the most money gets on the “legitimate” news stations. Look at faux news, for 8 years bulldog Cheney hid but now that he is out of office he is everywhere. Personally I am sick of seeing the Jolie-Pitts and used to be goverment. Someone needs to intervene with those kids. I miss the days where I took everything at face value and expected some truth from the media.

    Reply
  26. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Btw, AJ didn’t decide until the last minute to come, did she? The hair that needed a touchup on the roots kind of backed up what you said about that. How often to you see a star on the Red Carpet (except for Madge) with roots that need done?

    Reply
  27. Zzzzzzzzzzzz said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    About as boring as Kim Jong Il playing with atomic bombs.

    Reply
  28. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    @Canuck:
    I agree she didn’t go all out appearance wise but she had to have been at least contemplating attending. Those gowns that she wears to those events are decided weeks in advance and there are fittings that are done. So she was expected to go at least.

    Reply
  29. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @cuze:
    I wondered about the custom made butt padding/corset thingy, but decided that it might have been something she had already. She wears a fair number of strapless gowns.

    I would think that it would be fairly easy to call up a designer that you use and have them send a bunch of things over when you are in NYC. But then again, I’ve never done that obviously so I might just be imagining how things work.

    Reply
  30. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    @Canuck:
    That’s how I’ve always figured it was like.. sometimes designers will pursue the actresses to wear their stuff as well. What a life, eh! Yeah, I’d imagine the butt pad is a staple in the Jolie wardrobe. Always on standby.

    Reply
  31. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Sounds like reality is setting in with the Sudanese. Pitt didn’t marry her so she’s upset. hmmmm…

    Reply
  32. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    @cuze:
    Yes, but that one was made for a far more “structured” dress, lol. When she gets out of the car in the video of the Red Carpet, you can see it swinging like a mud flap :)

    Reply
  33. TobyKat said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    Hey everyone, i posted the below on the other thread but thought I’s post it over hear too. About her new tatoo. References to Winston Churchill who by the way was one of the founders of the United Nations:
    Last weekend Angelina was photographed having a day of fun with her kids in Central Park. One photograph reveled a new addition to her body art. It’s of roman numerals. “V- MCMXL.” It’s located next to the “XIII” tattoo Jolie got several years ago. Put together it reads XIII-V-MCMXL. A very crafty fan did some research and found out that it might be a reference to … Winston Churchill. The numbers read out to be 13 / 05 /1940, the date of Churchill’s famous Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat speech.
    In several interviews Jolie has spoken about the respect and admiration she has for the late British Prime Minister. In an interview from 2005 she was asked who were her idols growing up. Jolie stated “Winston Churchill! I did, I loved Winston Churchill! Yeah. I have posters of Lawrence of Arabia and Winston Churchill books – that’s my house.” She went on to say “when I get depressed, or I feel a little out of focus, I read their speeches, or their books, or things about them. It makes me feel centred. They just seem to be very clear thinkers. I’m sure I could analyse it to death, but they just inspire me and focus me. “ And in another interview Jolie talked again about her Churchill love. “I love Churchill. I have every book on him. I listen to his speeches on tape – the last great orator and statesmen, and his painting and his bricklaying and his marriage. He’s one of the founders of the United Nations.”

    Reply
  34. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @Canuck:
    lol

    Reply
  35. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @cuze:
    I think that if Pitt has a half a brain, he’ll wait until the baby is born and make sure it’s his first. Once bitten…

    Reply
  36. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @cuze:
    LOL little weenie was in hiding in Cannes, now does it not seem odd that he an go mama would fight over his friendship with Jen but not Miss Sudanese?

    Reply
  37. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    woooohooooo, now that is worth waiting for…..@HisHighness:

    Reply
  38. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    People don’t you see where this is going? AJ has either given up or lost custody. Judges prefer to give custody to the parent who actually spends time with the children. I’m hazarding a guess that Ian got ahold of nanny or two who has testified under oath about AJ’s relationship with the children and yes, that he would have to clear with the lawyers.

    Reply
  39. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Perhaps IAN is planning to devulge the identity of the bio not Brads? Or at least strongly hint at the possible father? I think too that the real blockbuster is something about the children..From Shiloah’s looks, i’d say she is Brad’s bio, but the twins look strange to me, not even fraternal, can’t pin point it, but in my gut something is out of kilter. Two of three Bios’ are Brads….but…..how many of the bios are Angies?

    Reply
  40. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @Different Guest:Just to add, all my opinion of course.

    Reply
  41. Chaka said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    lol i agree

    Reply
  42. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I feel sorry for the child, if there is one, who is the “non-bio” and who gets “outed”. Personally, I think that might be something best left unsaid to the grand public. That child didn’t ask to be in the middle of all of this crap, none of them did. I feel very sorry for the whole lot of them. :(

    Reply
  43. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Different Guest:
    SR hinted that she had lost or negotiated away custody, or at least we thought that might have been what he meant with the “take 4, take 6″ a while back. I hope for the sake of the kids that is the case, and that BP does right by them before it’s too late.

    Reply
  44. I'm on the bidet said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    @HisHighness:
    “Sudanese Sister pissed off at Brangie – coming soon.”
    I only pray that by ‘Sudanese Sister’ you mean that the Sudanese model Brad impregnated is also a Nun?

    Reply
  45. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    LOL, that’s funny! Model/nun?

    Reply
  46. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    Ah now tell me Ian how many movies did Jolie shoot last year? It was like …like … ehm – NOT ONE! Bwahahah!

    Reply
  47. sama said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:

    I don’t think that anybody will believe the story about the Sudanese women who is pregnant ….. Everybody is going yeah right……

    People are more interested in what happend in Cannes or that they are splitt or going to, that sort of stuff….

    Reply
  48. chris said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    @ruby:
    she didn’t need to, she had all the attention she wanted with the promotions of her movies and the pregnancy

    Reply
  49. Gitano said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Some people are better parents by the absence. IMO the more time Angelina spends away from her kids, the better for the kids. They might actually turn out better with the nannies as role model. Just saying … BTW this is not news. And the “retirement from acting after this movie” story is getting old. Just goes to show Jolie has no qualms about lying. And her publicists think the public is stupid and has no memory.

    Reply
  50. stinky-inky said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @cuze:
    If that’s the case, it’s time to fire the stylist.

    Reply
  51. stinky-inky said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @ffleur:
    Exactly. Hello Brangie, ever hear of the Boy Who Cried Wolf? Come up with a new schtick already.

    Reply
  52. anonymouse said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @TobyCat:
    Churchill for dummies. She is clueless or more evil than expected.
    Her idol is a war criminal.

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/raico-churchill5.html

    How embarrassing for a wannabe humanitarian.

    Reply
  53. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @Gitano:

    Publicists lying? Oh god no! Don`t shock me! Isn`t that common knowledge in hollywood? Look at Jen who lied to Oprah (Hah even in person and NOT through her PR) that she was still with Vince Vaughn after they had already split because Vince was caught with a student in a hotel room ? Remember Vince even threathened to sue the mag that published the photos! Guess he did not. Bwhahaha. And how Jen claimed that she wanted to be a young mum right after her marriage! Too bad that didn`t work out. Now it was not like there haven`t been plenty of guys whom she she dated since her divorce. She is just another star who claimed to put family above acting and who shows no sign of slowing down, filming one movie after the other and even directing some. Now tell me again how trustworthy are stars when even the supposed girl-next-door( well she is certainly not MY girl-ext-door as I can`t afford to live in a multi million dollar home with lots of staff and even a n extra guard house!) can`t be trusted anymore?

    Reply
  54. stinky-inky said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Sudanese Sister pissed off at Brangie – coming soon reminded me of this:

    i am as sad
    as the song
    of a soudanese jackal
    who is wailing for the blood red
    moon he cannot reach and rip
    –archy interviews a pharoh by Don Marquis

    Reply
  55. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    @TobyKat:

    WOW, bitch is aligning herself with the man who is considered by most of the UK to be the “greatest living Brit of all time”. Seriously? An ex-heroin addicted, self-harming, homewrecking, sexually perverted bit of HW fluff with a history of mental illness and suicide attempts is associating herself with the man who defended the UK and Europe from the Nazis rule and ensured our freedom as a nation. Is that what she’s actually doing there? I didn’t think it was possible that this woman could make me any more angry than she already has but she’s pulled it off. I am floored by that, totally floored. Let’s all look forward to the time she puts Gandhi on her forehead, Malcolm X on her derriere and Nelson Mandela on her left tit. This woman takes shameless to new levels. And yes the quote she gave about retiring from acting when she was promoting Changelinng made the BBC 6 O’Clock news in the UK, can you believe that? Congratulations to the BBC for being totally suckered in by this woman’s PR, great bit of journalistic insight there. Her exact quote I believe was she wanted to stay home and “become a Grandma”. Her oldest child was then about 7 I believe. So I would hope we’re talking a good 15 years before that happens. Well done the beeb for totally failing to point that out. The media puppeteer strikes again. And re: the post, I’m assuming the body of the story hasn’t been cleared by the lawyers yet?

    Reply
  56. sama said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    @ruby:

    Maybe Jen at that time wanted to have children but when you are getting divorced things change also what you say about she has had other guys but what do you want that she is going to get pregnant by the first guy that comes along…. you at least need a stable relationship because otherwise you end up alone…… that is just putting the “kids” first and not what you say her career……

    About Vince i don’t know nothing about so i don’t say something about that…. you could be wright or not …… i don’t know…..

    Reply
  57. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    @sama:
    bb14. I have just had BradPitt Watch send me photos of Ange back at work. In all of them she is wearing that baggy shirt with belt and eating salt. And I tell you she is NOT PREGNANT she is flat. If I knew how to send them I would but I don’t know I’ll see if someone can help me.

    Reply
  58. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @ruby:Hmmm, well how long was she on promotional tours for Changeling, taking meetings to discuss the production of Salt, meeting with Patricia Cornwell to discuss production of the Kay Scarpetta novels into movies, as well as the promotional tours for CCOBB and then the whole awards season festivities where they acted oh so gracious. Maybe she didnt actually shoot a movie but she was seriously busy IMO

    Reply
  59. DebFrmHell said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @ruby:
    There were no roles for a heavily pregnant with twins action films to be made last year. Perhaps that is why there wasn’t one made. Instead she did twelve minutes of voiceover work in Jack Blacks cartoon movie and spent the time promoting and resting for The Big Event.

    Did you forget that part or are you of the belief that she wasn’t preggars with the twins as many DO believe…

    **giggles**

    Reply
  60. chris said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    well she could have made a movie as well it wouldn’t have changed changeling’s fate.

    Reply
  61. g said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    Who is her PR team? Is this Geyer or Trevor?

    Reply
  62. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    @Caribsmom:

    Now count the hours she probably spent doing extreme hard work like attending award ceremonies and some meetings! Now what figure did you reach? Maybe the equivalent of a months work (40 hours a week) max? Hardly more. Hey most mothers can only dream of such a “hard” job!

    Reply
  63. Liz E. said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    HisHighness said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
    part II coming soon – this was an appetizer.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Oh, please. This is so lame. You know nothing about how much time this woman spends with her children. You have not offered up one “story” about these people that could either be confirmed one way or the other and you know it. All you are doing is repeating imaginings about her by people who don’t like her and then feeding into it with made-up silliness. You haven’t changed, Ian. You’ve just learned to pick targets you know have a history of not suing over gossip.

    For the record many very busy professional women are great mothers and actually spend time with their children. This is nothing but sexist misogyny.

    Reply
  64. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    @ruby:Oh I think it was a LOT more than 40 hours for sure! But this is the last thing I have to say to you on this, I do NOT intend to get into a spitting contest with you. It’s just that your tone is so argumentative that I responded at all. ENOUGH

    Reply
  65. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    I so agree. The only child who appears favored, and happy with AJ is her first, Maddox. AJ seems to put him ahead of all the others in every way. Shiloah, Pax Tien are nearly ignored. The twins? who knows, we never see/hear anything about them. Z? Used to be a huge to-do over that one, but even she has dropped under the publicity radar. Speaking of, none of them other than the two boys on teh Niagra Falls trip with Brad have been seen out an about lately….Angie too busy? Perhaps her two/three days at The Hague and Canne would have been better spent with her children? Just asking@Canuck:

    Reply
  66. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    @sama:

    She wasn’t even in a relationship with Vince Vaughn, it was just a PR story. Here we go with the Jen was too selfish to have children BS again as planted in the minds of the loonatics by their dire idol. Another great piece of PR manipulation. Wow that Jen so selfish that she wanted to have children when she wanted to and not when the world told her to, or that Jen, so selfish that she was trying to have children but couldn’t fall pregnant for Brad or carry a baby to full term. That selfish witch let’s bring back the ducking stool or burn her at the stake. Instead lets hold up the example of Saint Angelina who immediately got up the duff for her man, even before he’d managed to leave his wife quite yet. Wow that there is a selfless woman is she not? Women behold the rules of how to properly fulfil your womanhood and be a good and selfless member of society, it is as follows: get up the duff asap to make sure your lover leaves his wife for you, rapidly adopt another one or two to make sure he can’t leave or change his mind, when things start to go up shit creek without a paddle in your relationship and you sense he is about to leave you, either get pregnant immediatement with twins (the only way to nail him for sure), and if you can’t physically achieve it, pay someone else to carry them for you. But obviously the moment you have had/bought all these kids you can hand all of them straight over to your team of nannies and never have to deal with them again. Just whip ‘em out for photo opporunities and bobs your uncle you are Saint Angelina selfless mother of the year. Brilliant. Hope everyone knows what duties they have to fulfil as a woman now. If you thought we had had a sexual revolution I’m afraid you were wrong. Well, we might as well not have had one now we have Angelina “you are only a woman if you pop out children for your man left, right and centre” Jolie to set us all back a good centruy or so. Thanks Ange, you’re a proper star!

    Reply
  67. Curious George said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    After IUC’s prior Brangie blockbusters that a Sudanese model is pregnant with Brad’s child (and that she traveled to Cannes to confront him), that Brad is in a rehab program, and that Angelina “makes love to at least one plant a day,” the 2nd BLOCKBUSTER this week has to be really incredible as it’s IUC’s “biggest Brangie story yet”! I’m not sure I’d consider this particular story to be a “blockbuster” per say…

    Reply
  68. topbrit said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    well we all knew she wasn’t mother of the year material,the selfish. manipulating. bullshitting bitch but isn’t pitt just as selfish,manipulating and bullshitting hmm?he is away as often,i am just presuming by ‘different guest’ post that he is the slightly better parent therefore she has lost or limited custody,lesser of two evils ji would say!

    Reply
  69. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    So what is it? You blame her for not spending enough time with her kids when you don`t see enough pictures of her and the kids but when you do you call her a publicity w.hore! Now decide!

    By the way I was talking about A MONTH work (40 hours per week makes 160 hours in total) Caribsmum.

    Reply
  70. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    http://www.mold-help.org/content/view/623/
    In July on 2004, Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt’s attempts to start a family – allegedly were rocked by a devastating miscarriage, according to a national tabloid. Nevertheless, health problems could have possibly played a role in the couple’s day to day lives@ruby:

    Reply
  71. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    @Patty Anne:I agree with you on that Patty. Mad seems to be the only one she’s really bonded with IMO. I thought for a long time that she was quite partial to Z, but she seems to be getting relegated to the oh so rare photo op. She doesn’t seem to have any bond with Pax, AND we havent seen the “walking them to school photo op” in a looooong time. In fact, are they going to school anymore or being home schooled?

    Reply
  72. ladybert62 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Sounds good – looking forward to it! :P

    Reply
  73. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Right click on the photo with your mouse
    Then click on PROPERTIES
    A URL of the photo will come up
    Copy that URL (highlight with left click and right click COPY)
    Come back here and post it@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  74. ladybert62 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @Keane:
    Good one Keane – Dang, you crack me up! :D

    Reply
  75. Liz E. said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
    People don’t you see where this is going? AJ has either given up or lost custody. Judges prefer to give custody to the parent who actually spends time with the children. I’m hazarding a guess that Ian got ahold of nanny or two who has testified under oath about AJ’s relationship with the children and yes, that he would have to clear with the lawyers.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Where does this come from? You don’t just “testify under oath” out of the blue. There has to be an ongoing legal proceeding. So in what jurisdiction is this legal proceeding happening? When did it get filed? Who are the lawyers? What are the names of all these nannies? None of these facts would be hard to ascertain? Do you really think that if such a thing were remotely true or even plausible that Ian would be the only one with this information? Why would that be? Is anyone using their analytical faculties or is this blind acceptance all just based on wishful thinking?

    Why would Ian have to clear a witness’ testimony with his lawyers? A witness, even a Grand Jury witness, is not proscribed from repeating their testimony to whomever they please. Now people are just trying to come up with excuses for no real news.

    Reply
  76. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    bb14. There was a vote taken on Hellomagazine. Questions were ” One of the strongest couples in showbusiness count was 271.
    Other question Looks like the relationship has become strained – count 389.
    looks like people are wiesing up to these 2 loons.

    Reply
  77. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    Ruby – this is what I responded to, no mention of a MONTH, you said Last Year!!

    ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
    Ah now tell me Ian how many movies did Jolie shoot last year? It was like …like … ehm – NOT ONE! Bwahahah!

    Reply
  78. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    I must agree with you on this one Keane, i like to think a woman is more than a uterus and incubater. If there is true love and respect, bearing a bio child should not matter to either party. It was my understanding that Jennifer wanted to adopt after she miscarried in June/July of 2004, but Brad wouldn’t have it. Bio or nothing. @Keane:

    Reply
  79. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @Patty Anne:I saw a picture of her back to work eating chocolate cake. She looked normal, not pin eyed puffy chalk white or sweating, …

    Reply
  80. topbrit said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    # keane – hope all the prick trolls coming on here take note of your excellent post but not holding my breath hun

    Reply
  81. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    (((((((((((((((((((( Ruby )))))))))))))))))) does that make you feel better now hun? No need to get so worked up. Angelina Jolie has always been selfish, has admitted to it herself. She lied when Pax was adopted , saying she was taking a year off to ease him into the family and learn to understand English….did she though? I hope you feel better soon Ruby…take a breath, get a glass of water and relax….it’s a blog not life and death@ruby:

    Reply
  82. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    HAHAHAHA

    Reply
  83. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @ruby:
    I’m sure with the flights, travelling etc, it was far more than a month’s work. Filming in Germany, Cannes last year, Benjamin Button promotions all around the globe, Changeling promotions, and then the award season. They hardly stayed put for about the last 6 months of the year.

    Reply
  84. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    ((((((((((((((((( Liz E ))))))))))))))) here’s your love hug sweetie. Now we all want to thank you very much for volunteering to find us the names of the Lawyers, the names of the Nannies. It is very considerated of you, and would prove your point posted above. See? It’s so easy to find out that Liz E volunteered for it! Yeaaa. That deserves another hug ((((((((((((((((((( Liz E )))))))))))))) “Who are the lawyers? What are the names of all these nannies? None of these facts would be hard to ascertain?”@Liz E.:

    Reply
  85. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    Just another rumor in a million! I could just as well tell you that there were pictures in 2004 showing Jen coming out of a plastic surgery clinic that show her with a slight bump although it might just have been from eating too much. 2 Months later at Cannes her stomach was as flat as ever. Now I could just draw a connection between the appointment at the dermatologist office specializing in botox and minor surgeries and the loss of a possible child if I was as mean as Ian! Which I am not – I leave you to your hatred of Jolie. Surely the world doesn`t have any bigger problems than her at the moment! No wonder the Americans voted for Bush twice! Looks like they limited their attention to the fight against the bigger evil: Jolie! Bwahahah. Now that paid of.

    Reply
  86. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I’ll give it a go but I tell you I’m not that good at this stuff.

    Reply
  87. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @Canuck:Not to mention all the UN Goodwill trips to Iraq and whatever to promote her Halo

    Reply
  88. ladybert62 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    As I posted on another thread here, to the evil Ms. Jolie those kids are nothing more than trophies – she might as well take their little heads and tack them to the wall with a name and number under them so she knows who they are and when she got them. The evil Ms. Jolie loves no one except the evil Ms. Jolie.

    Reply
  89. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Calm down Liz E. this is just a gossip site that you have said from word go does not have a grain of truth in it. You’ve been posting incessantly for months now about things you have said you know for a fact aren’t true. Why does it bother you so? You seem so personally involved in all this, so desperate to tear Ian down. Why would that be? Angelina does not need a knight in shining armour by the name of Liz E. to do her bidding for her, that’s what she has Trev for! I’m sure Trev will be on to this stat. If I were you I’d calm your fiery little mind down and take a chill pill my friend. What does this all matter to you? If you don’t believe any of it as you always say, why not move on to a site that prints stories you do believe. People posting here do believe what Ian has to say, that is our prerogative. Angie doesn’t need you to weigh in n her behalf.

    Reply
  90. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    Pointing to myself: Im glad to be an American where at least I know Im free…….

    @Ruby = Hey now! There’s no need to start attacking the whole United States in your little diatribe.

    Reply
  91. Liz E. said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    I wish people would stop imposing their wishes and dreams onto Jennifer Aniston. No woman is required to be a mother. Aniston is 40 years old. She was married for over 4 years. She was with the same man for 7 years. She had a steady job for 10 years that could have easily accommodated motherhood and not interfered with her career in the least. There has never been any evidence or credible source that Jennifer had a miscarriage. That is just some fantasy of the “Brad and Jen” fans. She had and continues to have all the resources in the world to be a mother if she opts for that path. She did not elect to have or adopt a child. People should leave it at that and get off her back. Not everyone wants to be a mother and her choice should be respected.

    Reply
  92. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @ladybert62:LOL She already has them tacked to the wall – TATOOED ON HER ARM, so she can at least have the latitude and longitude of where they were born just in case she forgets!!

    Reply
  93. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    So is that the answer then, the NANNY has the kids, we’ve been asking this question for days and days. Is there no other family member around besides Mommy I mean Nanny??

    Reply
  94. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    I saw that photo also and wondered when it was taken….perhaps they only “said” it was after her return from Canne? Would seem to drastic an improvement from looking like death warmed over with Brad in Canne….@Caribsmom:

    Reply
  95. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    @Liz E.:

    The only problem with this is that Jen has been saying for 10 years now that she wants to be a mother. True noone forces her to be one but if she says so then she should follow suit.

    Reply
  96. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    http://www.bradpittwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/10.jp
    bb14, patty ann I hope this works I haven’t a clue

    Reply
  97. ladybert62 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    Good one Caribsmom! That is exactly right! and now she got Winston’s Churchill’s famous speech date tattooed someplace else on her skanky body! Poor Winston, turning over in his grave I am sure! :P

    Reply
  98. annabell said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    So, Ian is saying her public image of being a model mother is what changed the world’s perception of her. So if his blockbuster is that she lost custody of the kids, what will that do to her public image?

    Reply
  99. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Ooh subtle there Liz E., that’s a subtle one, or dare I say devious in fact! How surprising considering the source! In one argument you simultaneously say that people should get off Jen’s back for not having children because she didn’t want them, and that she had no intention or desire to have them nor ever had a miscarriage! That was a work of pure genius, congrats! Yes you’ve always been a “genius at PR” haven’t you now? Now why don’t we all leave Jennifer Aniston out of this as she has nothing whatsoever to do with this post. The only connection she has to the skank is that she had the misfortune to have her husband stolen by her. I’m sure if Jen had had her wish she would never have had to have been associated with that piece of trash in any way in her life. I bet it is a great source of chagrin to her that her name has been dragged in to the mix of this dreadful person’s life in any way at all, let alone in the terribly painfulo circumstances it has been. Aniston has nothing to do with Jolie’s neglect of her children. There is no need to mention her name one more time on this thread. Full stop.

    Reply
  100. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    “No wonder the Americans voted for Bush twice! Looks like they limited their attention to the fight against the bigger evil: Jolie! Bwahahah. Now that paid of.” Poor ruby, yes i am an American, and yes it is Memorial Day here, where we pay respects to our fallen soldiers who died so we may have freedom to chat on a blog such as this without fear of censure….I normally hug the idiot poster here, however you have earned a special place above all other shallow thinking, narrow minded, prejudice morons who enjoy a freedom many American soldiers fought and died to assure you. In this case i’m just going to tell you on behalf of all American soldier who are so very proud to be a free American….Kiss My Happy Ass!@ruby:

    Reply
  101. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    bb14.@Patty Anne:
    bb14. Ok I’ve done it. when you have clicked on the URL then click on the list of photos at the top of the page saying BradPitt Watch.com and they will all come up.

    Let me know how you went, and more to the fact how I went doing it. Good Luck

    Reply
  102. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Is it just me or does —–Bwahahaha—— sound like a deranged psycho Boris Karloff wannabee trying out a convincing evil laugh? Stupid IMO

    Reply
  103. ladybert62 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Picture me clapping, Patty Anne! Color me happy. Amen to Patty Anne. :P

    Reply
  104. sama said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @ruby:

    Don’t you get sick and tired of it, you don’t know her neither do I. How do you know that she doesn’t want to have children, in the past she has said i want children but i don’t want to adopt and i want to do it with a partner in a stable relationship. Maybe she felt she has not got that with the guys who she was with. It has not happend yet or maybe it will never happen. Things change, people change, choices change. Is it that hard to understand. IT’S HER CHOICE, HER LIFE.

    Reply
  105. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    You successfully posted BradPittWatch, however, it says the page is not there anymore….hummm. Good Job though…now you can post any URL you wish here@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  106. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @Patty Anne:I heart U!!!

    Reply
  107. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @ruby:

    Absolutely, this woman is an appalling specimen of humanity. She says she wants something but does not deliver the goods as you automatically should the moment you say you want something. Listen, I would like to get married at some point in my life. If I say that in a public forum then I must fulfil that desire within a 5 year time span otherwise I am to be burned at the stake. One day I would like to own a vineyard in Tuscany. Now I have said that I must automatically fulfil that desire otherwise I must just be seeing it for effect right? Cause no-one says they would like to do somthing in a general way without going out and doing it straight away right? And if they do say that and don’t imediately do it then they are obviously lying right? Totally, of course. Your logic is flawless.

    Reply
  108. ladybert62 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @annabell:
    The day she loses custody of any one of her precious little children, is the day the evil Ms. Jolie does down big time!

    Reply
  109. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    Oh…Bwahahaha Is LOONese for “Ah, did i say sompin good?” “I’m laffin up my arse at my wit and charm”@Caribsmom:

    Reply
  110. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Got it! Saw the first photo of Jolie licking her finger, must have had some Pogo’s chicken huh>? Got the other photos too….thanks!!@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  111. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    @ladybert62:Like a lead balloon. Her HALO is firmly attached by the family shtick, she will totally have to reinvent herself, I was saying this the other day. They are probably having furious meetings to figure out how to announce the split and maintain their golden status. I can’t wait to see what they come up with.

    Reply
  112. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    No thanx I leave that to Ian! By the way what has voting to do with the soldiers who lost their lives? You are not trying to tell me that you limit Bush to the Iraq war now do you? He was a questionable president in many other fields too you know for example foreign relations! Not exactly his strong point!
    By the way I wasn`t even aware that you have Memorial Day over there since I am European and we don`t have this holiday!

    Reply
  113. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    bb14. patty anne if you keep clicking down after the salt photos there about 100 other photos of Cannes and many of Brad and kids.

    Reply
  114. Liz E. said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Ah, the old red herring raises its tired old head. Asking Ian to provide some proof or even some details that can be verified about his many stories is somehow unacceptable at this site. It amusingly invites sarcasm and paranoid accusations. Why freak out every time Ian’s credibility is questioned? Why take it so personally? This site is not about its posters. Or is it?

    No “journalist” would complain about such questions or prodding. A journalist would actually be happy to provide those details because that is what they do. They do not just repeat rumors. They seek out the truth and provide truthful details. Details that can be verified by others. It is Ian’s self proclaimed job to uncover facts. Why can’t he uncover these simple facts with all his alleged undercover teams and inside sources?

    People can believe what they want but a thinking person would question all these tall tales when they are given no proof – no corroboration – whatsoever.

    Trying to twist the nature of my posts and my posting history here is rather lame and ineffective. I call it as I see it. I haven’t been here in quite a while and I am sure that I haven’t posted more than maybe 15 times since I first saw this site months ago. But be my guest and feed your fantasies and psychological needs as you so desire.

    Reply
  115. ladybert62 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    The Dark Queen will keep it interesting if nothing else! I try to picture those kids in 10 years and I just shiver when I think what they are going to turn into – hopefully whoever those nannies are, they are doing right by the children above all else. :D

    Reply
  116. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @Patty Anne:Wasn’t that the chocolate cake one? Here’s a thread to the Daily Mail Angie eats cake. She doesnt look puffy or pin eyed here, which kind of gives credence the the crying, drugs etc in Cannes

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1187206/Angelina-Jolie-chows-chocolate-cake-set-new-flick.html

    Reply
  117. too curious said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    *waving flag and cheering on Patty Anne*

    btw Ruby, most of GWB’s electoral wins had more to do with the tactics of the evil Karl Rove than with Texans and Americans priorities

    *wonders to self, if by any chance JV isn’t AJ’s Dad, could Karl Rove be?* *decides, no, that level of evil probably skips a generation or two*

    Reply
  118. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Keane:

    Thanx for proving my point Kene:

    “Cause Jolie says she would like to do somthing in a general way without going out and doing it straight away right? And if she did say that and didn’t imediately do it then she is obviously lying right” .

    Thanx for agreeing with me keane! I must say your logic is flawless too! (see I only changed the noun clearly “they” must stand for everybody and your opinion doesn`t just change wether you like or dislike someone right?)

    Reply
  119. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    I think we’d all be a lot happier if the comments were levelled at the topic at hand and NOT ones nationality, sexual preference, education level or marital status, okay??? Only a loon would come here and insult an entire nation with one comment. Enough said.

    Reply
  120. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. Thanks for telling me how to paste. Do you really thinnk she is pregnant in those salt photos??

    Reply
  121. too curious said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Ian, Thanks for the appetizer and Happy Memorial Day! I know you said you would add something new today but then I thought, he’s been in Cannes, does he remember Monday is a holiday? So thanks for working a bit and hope you enjoy a margarita or refreshing beverage of your choice.

    Reply
  122. dawn said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    *yawn* this is more about pr for the book than anything else, isn’t it?

    Reply
  123. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @Liz E.:

    But why are you here Liz E., why do you keep coming back for more month after month after month if you are convinced Ian does not have any proof? If you know he doesn’t, why do you keep coming back? The reason the rest of us are here is because we understand how journalism and libel laws work and know Ian must have some foundation to post what he does otherwise he wouldn’t do it or he would be in the process of defending a heavy libel case right now. If you think that’s codswallop then that is your prerogative and is up to you, but why keep coming back for more? If you want more proof of Ian’s sources and stories why not wait for his book to come out in October and make a judgment then? For someone who so strongly has never believed a word of what Ian has ever posted and believes that he does not have one shred of proof of it, you seem remarkably personally involved in this site. Why would that be? The onky people that these stories affect are Angelina Jolie and her fans, but you don’t seem to be either one. What on earth is motivating you to come back, month after month after month?

    Reply
  124. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    @Liz E.:

    And BTW Liz E., lots of reputable “journalists” including those who report on the BBC evening news, repeated Jolie’s lie that she wants to retire, stay at home and become a grandma. Journalists, even the most reputable ones in the world, do not always report the truth you know. Many of them are bamboozled by the PR strategies of manipulative celebrities.

    Reply
  125. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    @TobyKat:
    she may have all the books to be had on Churchill, but I doubt she has ever cracked them open.

    Reply
  126. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    You are most welcome. And no, i seriously doubt she is preggers again. I know she and Brad reportedly had a big blow up over her wish to adopt another, in fact i have read today that she is looking into the Sudan to adopt now, and Brad has refused any more children until they take proper care of the ones they now have. Jolie likes to stir up chyt by dressing in a Is She? Or Isn’t She? manner sometimes. Yawn…just more of Angie’s head games…Run Brad and grab the kids on your way out…leave Mad to her though@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  127. Liz E. said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
    @Liz E.:

    The only problem with this is that Jen has been saying for 10 years now that she wants to be a mother. True noone forces her to be one but if she says so then she should follow suit.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I understand what you are saying but Jennifer doesn’t have to do anything. She certainly doesn’t have to do it on any timetable. There is nothing more intrusive than asking a woman or couple when they are going to have children. I cringe every time I hear some silly entertainment reporter asking that question.

    It is easy to get backed into a corner with such questions. Who says that question even deserves an honest answer. Maybe people don’t even know the answer themselves yet they are supposed to provide some stranger with a microphone answers. The proper response is “none of your damn business.” People know that if you were to say you didn’t want children or were unsure about it then the public would attack you as if you were some evil, unnatural woman. Who needs that crap.

    Even here at this site the idea that Jennifer might prefer other things to children is attacked as an attack on her. See how simple minded and single minded people are. If Jennifer is portrayed as someone other than their fantasy of her then it is perceived as an attack on her. It is an amzaing yet all too common projection of one’s hopes and dreams onto a celebrity. I say lay off all women on this issue.

    Reply
  128. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Caesar Millan’ sez sssssssssttttt! Lol

    Reply
  129. too curious said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Ian, btw, on your previous post and your comments on Austria? I grew up in a teeny little village in the Midwest, and my best friend’s family moved in when we were in 3rd grade. Her Dad was Hungarian (and lost family members at Auschwitz) and her Mom was Austrian (and formerly Roman Catholic). They both were naturalized Americans and this was a second marriage for each. Growing up with a Jewish best friend I was always stunned at how some people view Jews along the same lines as Martians or something. The ironic thing is that this village had 1 traffic light, 8 churches, and yet many people went to places of worship in other towns (Catholics, Mennonites, Jehovah’s witnesses, etc.). Having had the benefit of knowing an Austrian woman, I hope her sense of life and obvious comfort with a Jewish spouse and raising Jewish children turns out to be typical of the spirit you encounter if you go there :)

    Reply
  130. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Having storms here today, so many of my posts are lost out in the internet somewhere. But you are most welcome. Sharing knowledge makes it all the more valuable to me. No, Jolie isn’t pregnanat, she’s just playing for attention from the paps again, in any manner she has at hand…..i had read today that she is looking to adopt a child very soon….get this…..from Sodan??@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  131. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @Patty Anne:hahahaha I use that on my own dogs and it REALLY WORKS! LOL

    Reply
  132. too curious said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @Patty Anne:

    No wonder the Sudanese sister is pissed – Brange is trying to steal her baby! LOL

    As always my posts all contain my opinion and only my opinion. Well, with larges doses of sarcasm, empathy and snark ;)

    Reply
  133. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Speaking of dogs, LOL Im taking my puppies out for a walk in the rain in our woods behind the house. Will catch up with you all later! xoxoxo Tamara

    Reply
  134. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @sama:
    I’m with you. Ian – give us a little Cannes dish. Were they really being ignored by their peers? Was it because they were idiots at the party or because they are arrogant bastards in general? Do tell….pretty please. There must be a waiter or somebody who could spill a little dirt. Por Favor

    Reply
  135. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Keane:
    That is horribly offensive to me as well. She doesn’t know a damn thing about Churchill beyond a soundbite. I too, find this ridiculous. I think she may have mis-spoken. It’s more likely Hitler and Satan that she relates too.

    Reply
  136. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @ruby:

    !!!! GREAT example Ruby, you should be hired by Jolie’s PR team, you’re almost as tricksy as them. Listen honeypie, I’m obviously going to have to break it down for you a little bit more clearly because you are a bit slow on the uptake. There are things in life that are choices such as having kids or moving to Tuscany. Saying you intend to do those things at some point does not mean you are necessarily going to do them now or even in the near future. They are just things you would like to do at some point in life. There are other things in life that are not choices, that are inevitable for everyone. Examples of these are paying taxes (unless you set up a foundation to dodge paying them and get good press for what a great philanthropist you are instead, but I digress), retiring and ultimately, dying. These things are inevtiable and will happen to everyone eventually. You do not say you want to retire soon if by “soon” you mean in 30 years time. Its a bit like me saying I want to die and go up to heaven soon you see. If I mean by that I want to die when I’m old and grey and in my mid-90’s then that would be a lie wouldn’t it? That would not be “soon” at all but at the last possible minute. It was Jolie herself who put a time limit on it. She said her plans for the near future were to retire for acting and stay home and become a grandma. Not that her plans for the future would be making 1-2 films a year for the next 10 years and then maybe running for President and when you’ve ruled the earth for 10 years, THEN retiring. Jen saying she would like to have children at some point is a totally different thing and only the very stupid would confuse the two. Now you’re not stupid are you ruby?

    Reply
  137. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    @Liz E.:

    Nope Liz E. you are trying to spin the tired old “Jen didn’t want to have children” yarn to justify why Ange stole her husband (”I was just a shoulder to cry on, he was devastated because he desperately wanted to have children and that wasn’t happening for him”, you know that old chestnut that Jolie tried to retract but the magazine stood by? Silly Ange thinking she can play every journo in the world). But you’re disguising it in a arugument that appears to support Jennifer’s right to not want children. Very, very crafty Liz E. I give you that, you are the perfect Ambassador for Jolie in fact. But I’m sure you know we’re all not stupid enough to fall for it don’t you? Pity.

    Reply
  138. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    Oh and being laid up with the fake pregnancy. That took half of the year right?

    Reply
  139. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Exactly my thought!….Lol@too curious:

    Reply
  140. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @too curious:
    George Shrub (he’s not even a bush!!!) wasn’t elected. FYI – that was rigged.

    Reply
  141. QuietOne said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    Your Highness…I’m trying to be very patient, but this is nowhere near a blockbuster and for an appetizer it’s quite underwhelming. If Part II is anything like Part I, I’m not impressed. I’ve been quietly lurking for awhile trying to determine the credibility of this site and your information. I SO want to be on board here, but really, do you think this is a blockbuster? One other thing confuses me, if you don’t have clearance from your legal team to post, why even mention it and get everyone excited. Just feel like I’m on a wild goose chase here…..and I SO want to be a believer……but…

    Reply
  142. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @QuietOne:

    I think Ian said yesterday that there may be a hold-up with the legal issues. I think he tells people he’s got a good story that he’s working on because people get fractious and restless. But he must be working his arse off to keep coming up with this stuff so I tend to be patient about it. This stuff is so difficult to come up with and corroborate and make sure it doesn’t expose Ian to being sued that it inevitably takes some time to put out. If he was just holding it all back for the book then he wouldn’t be under anywhere near as much time pressure as he is doing this. Let’s all try to be patient and give Ian some time to take a breath!

    Reply
  143. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    Just testing, home page says there are 141 comments on this thread, pull it up there are only 51

    Reply
  144. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Liz E.:Private Judge, not filed in the county of residence, records sealed.

    Reply
  145. Deutsche said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    Let’s start the countdown when she will surface the children. I predict the day will be Friday. Photo op coming up.

    Reply
  146. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    Nope! But when do you suggest that Jen has kids? At 50? It doesn`t get any more likely after 40 quite the opposite actualy!

    @Keane:

    Reply
  147. QuietOne said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @Keane:
    Hi Keane -

    I understand all that and I can be very patient. But for me I it’s about following up the words with actions that fit. I don’t believe Part I is a blockbuster. A blockbuster would have a “Wow” factor. There is not a “Wow” in the above post. For me it’s just a little more than disappointing. Believe me, I truly do want to be a believer, but this doesn’t do it for me. I understand he has to throw out a little bait to keep everyone interested but the follow through has to be consistent. I just don’t understand why he puts it out there if you cannot follow through with it. Like the Jen story. Where’s the rest of that? I don’t mean for this to be critical. I’m just disappointed that’s all. *sigh*

    Reply
  148. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    here’s a very cute pic of our patron saint. Just precious.

    http://www.celebrityfury.com/data/media/1/Angelina_Jolie.jpg

    Reply
  149. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    This is pretty mild appetizer, why the descent of the loon platoon? Ruby, with a little help from Science, the childbearing years have been considerably extended.

    Reply
  150. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Deutsche:

    Do you think she will go for Shiloh and Z or Mad and Pax? I’m thinking maybe the boys as they dragged the girls to the supermarket and Shi was in tears and hiding behind her blanket and Z was sucking her thumb and looking at Brad like she wanted to kill him. The boys are a bit more co-operative and play ball a bit more, for now. I don’t think it’ll be long before all these kids rebel against the parents they only see on days they are scheduled to participate in photo oportunities. What an unbelievable lie these people have decieved the world with. Or maybe Ange is concerned enough that appearing with Z and Shi or Mad and Pax won’t be enough this time. Time to bring out the big guns? And we all know who that means!

    Reply
  151. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @Keane:I think it’s at a point that they can’t bring all of them out unless the nannies are in close proximity.

    Reply
  152. mslewis said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    I stopped posting and only come to this site once or twice a month to see what new Ian has to say. Unfortunately, its the same old same old with no proof to back up what is being said. From Wednesday on, I waited breathlessly for somebody to write something about the “Sudanese model” who is with child by Mr. Pitt. I’ve read nothing!! If this woman was unable to confront Brad in person, why didn’t she just stand in front of a camerman and tell her story?? I mean, if Phoebe Price (I know, who?) can get her picture taken and published, surely a woman pregnant with Brad Pitt’s child could get her face and story in the news. Why didn’t that happen, Ian??

    And, the Jolie-Pitts were “high” on drugs and barely speaking to each other!! If that was true, why did they spend nine hours together Wednesday night? If they hated each other, one of them should have left early (a headache, or Angie could have be exhausted after all that time in The Hague). Why did they choose to spend so much time with each other AND the cast and crew of the movie at that disco? Angie and Brad were all over each other and talking and laughing like they were having a great time. I would imagine it would be difficult to “act happy” for NINE HOURS with someone you hate!!

    And, now Ian, you are saying that Angelina doesn’t spend time with her brood!! How do you know that? Angie has been working on a movie and Brad AND HIS MOTHER AND FATHER are at home with the kids. That is their usual arrangement and has been since they became a couple. You must have forgotten!! The movie she is working on “Salt” is the first movie Angelina has filmed since November of 2007 when she filmed “Changling.” Wonder what she’s been doing with her time for the past year?? Oh, perhaps looking after her babies. And do you seriously think that Angelina would continue to employe a nanny who her children called “mommy”?? Do you? Seriously??

    I’m just asking these questions because I called up this site to see if there was anything new or if any of your predictions had come to pass. Nothing happening!! I’ll come back in a week or two and see what’s going on. Meanwhile, hope you had a good holiday weekend. Sweet dreams, dear!!

    P.S.: I wonder how Angelina Jolie can film a movie, fly to Europe for a couple days and return to continue filming and look wonderful when Ms. Aniston is “exhausted” with just filming??? Oh, never mind!! Not my business.

    Reply
  153. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    @ruby:

    Sweetheart 1) she’s not been in a serious relationship since her husband ditched her to appease his mid-life crisis, who do you propose she makes one with? Some people only want children if they’re in a serious relationship with someone they can see a future with, they don’t just want to get knocked up by any old Tom, Dick or Harry they bump into on the street. Some people are a bit picky about who they make other people with and plan to spend the rest of their life raising said people with. And when she was married to Brad, who says they weren’t trying? They had built a nursery in their home. The notion that Jen did not want kids was a red herring thrown out there to save her career. It was the only way she thought women would still like her. And didn’t it work hey? They don’t just like her, they worship her for it! Crafty little Angelina.

    Reply
  154. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    @Keane:
    Since he said this is about the Sudanese sister being mad at Brange and News of the World came out with a report that Ang was going to adopt from Somalia during the four months they are apart ,(you can not adopt from Somalia or Sudan according to the State Gov website on Intl Adoptions) is it possible that when he an Ang we still on good terms they made arrangements for a baby through this girl and now that they are splitting either she does not want to give the baby up or Brad is backing out of the deal, if it is his sperm?

    Reply
  155. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Yes, she’s already started her spin. Eating chocolate cake on set to dispel the scary skinny rumors. Or to enhance the pregnancy rumors, chocolate cake is just a craving you know. Next will be a photo op with “some” of the kids and,,,IMO BP will be along for the fun too, say something like the ice cream parlor (so very innocent on an early summer day, so wholesome) or maybe a toy store, that’s always a good one. Pay out to the kids for a good job working the photo op.

    Reply
  156. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @QuietOne:

    Could be lots of reasons, but I think they’re probably mostly legal ones. That’s the only reason things tend to be held up or blocked. AJ has the best lawyers money can buy. And if you’re under a cease and desist order then I think you are not even allowed to mention what has happened to the story, let alone publish it, do you see what I mean? I think that’s why he can’t tell us. As for Jen, I’m sure she has good lawyers too, but I think we will hear that story at some point. We just have to be patient that’s all. But with this one yeah this is just a teaser, the real story is obviously being held up for legal reasons I would say. Try to keep the faith – ha ha!

    Reply
  157. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @mslewis:
    Jen isn’t “exhausted”, she has finished filming.

    Reply
  158. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    @mslewis:

    And its looks that count hey mslewis? LOL

    Reply
  159. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    @Different Guest:

    Oh no now don`t tell me that Jen is going to make her latest movie “The Baster” a reality! Clearly the girl-next -door must find a more natural option! Although with her heavy work scedule and her only dating immature playboys that won`t happen anytime soon!

    Reply
  160. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    I thought the same thing about the cake, “feed the pregnancy rumours”.

    Reply
  161. sama said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @mslewis:

    Get your facts straight, jen is not exhausted her rep denied and filming was over done ….

    Reply
  162. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @QuietOne:
    I do get what you are saying and even though I understand what IAN is doing it is why we have lost posters, people get frustrated with it and they don’t understand.

    Reply
  163. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @Kate:But, if they are still going ahead with the adoption presuming this story is spot on, about the SS being the surrogate, why is she mad at Brangie? Maybe she’s made because they are NOT going through with the adoption now?? IDK

    Reply
  164. QuietOne said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate and Keane -

    Now…..this would be a Blockbuster!! I’ll come back another day when I’ve gathered more patience.
    Thanks for all the feedback.

    Reply
  165. Keane said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @Kate:

    Yeah that sounds possible, what a con on their part if so hey? Oh yeah we’re about to adopt another needy orphan only fact is nowhere will let us do it anymore and all the illegal routes have been shut down so we’re just going to make one quietly with a model and tell the world we adopted? I don’t know, even for them that sounds highly dodgy don’t you think? But maybe he knocked her up during a threesome and while they were planning to saty together they thought that would be the best way of getting out of it. No I don’t think so, I have to say. Those countries would be able to come right out and say they didn’t adopt from here, they wouldn’t be able to get away with it. I think she was part of the threesome action and something developed with her and Brad from there. He was messed up and lost and needed a shoulder to cry on, she was naive and starstrck and got sucked in. I think it was probably as simple as that. We’ll have to see what the Sudanese says though. Sounds like he’s going to deny it then. Hope she goes public and makes him take a DNA. Now that would make the whole house of cards come tumbling down hey? Although the PR victory would be Angelina’s. Maybe not such a good idea after all then! JMO

    Reply
  166. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    Of course, the padded stomach at Cannes, the chocolate cake, the faintng last month on set, maybe they really DO want us to believe she is pregnant again, the SS is the surrogate and they can’t announce the split until after they’ve made their millions off People for the exclusive rights to the first pics of the baby

    Reply
  167. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    BTW, and I mean this most respectfully, did Ian call her a Sudanese sister because she is black? I guess when she said she was going to adopt from Somalia or Sudan, she didnt mean a country LOL She literally meant from THE SUDAN! hahaha

    Reply
  168. Canuck said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Kate:
    Well, in all fairness, some of the posts that were advertised to be upcoming “blockbusters” were a bit less than the promised blockbuster. I don’t mind hearing that there is an update on it’s way etc (doesn’t always have to be a blockbuster), but it’s true that when you say it’s going to be a blockbuster post and it’s not, you do end up a bit disappointed.

    Reply
  169. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    @Caribsmom:Little problem if the baby isn’t lilywhite, or is AJ now going to claim african roots?

    Reply
  170. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    @Caribsmom:

    Oh sure they are going to sell a half-black baby as their own! Now you clearly didn`t think that one through did you?

    Reply
  171. Nope said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    I don’t know Keane…Ruby has a point…For example, I want to get drunk and I’m on my second glass of wine…but then again, I’m a doer, not a talker…;-)…I’m joking of course (only not about the second glass of wine). I find the anti-Jen thing baffling. Then again, I also think the Jolie hatred is at the least somewhat baseless when you consider its intensity and the lack of any real evidence of anything this site claims is true…I’ll reserve final judgment for Jolie if ANY of the rumors prove true…(until then, I will tend to believe she’s a narcissistic attention whore like 80% of Hollyweird, no better no worse). Jen? Meh, I can’t be bothered enough to care about her one way or the other, but I don’t get why Angieophiles hate her? Makes no sense. She never did anything to Ange…

    Reply
  172. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    bb14. I’m not convinced that this sudanese woman is pregnant with Brad’s child. We have heard no further reports of it than what we have been told. she never turned up on the red carpet as the story went. Even Ian said that he wasn’t convinced. Until it’s reported as true then I am a non-believer As looney as Brad is at times is I just think he would’nt get another woman pregnant even if he was seeing some-one else which hasn’t been proven yet apart from seeing Jen.

    Reply
  173. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    @ruby:HAHAHAHA Noooooo I didnt! LOL Thanks

    Reply
  174. Caribsmom said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Im thinking of two different scenarios, one: she’s pretending to be pregnant, in which case a white baby or a miscarriage will arive or two: they are adopting, possibly the SS’s, and I got my stories muddled up! LOL Soooorrrrrrry!!

    Reply
  175. benjaminbutton14 said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @sama:
    bb14. I’m with you on that. I have just posted on the same subject I don’t believe she’s pregnant either.

    Reply
  176. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    @Keane:
    no I don’t mean she would claim to adopt from there but rather since they could not they used her as a surrogate maybe she just is pregnant and they were going to adopt her baby and now not so made up the stories about Brad.

    Reply
  177. Nope said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    I don’t fault mothers for having help with their kids if they can afford it, but I think it’s very, very SAD when the nannies raise the children. Those poor lil’ dumplings don’t really understand that those nannies are ‘hired help’. They form strong bonds with them. It can be devastating for them to realize that caring for them was primarily a ‘job’ of their most precious mother figure….
    I hope this is not the case with Jolie. I wouldn’t doubt for an instant that it is (because this is NOT at all uncommon among the wealthy). I just hope she’s at least an involved and decent mother even if she’s not without fault. I guess I just never understood why one want to be parents if they didn’t want to care for their offspring?

    Reply
  178. kick said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate! How are you honey? I have not commented in the longest time!!
    You are right, I forgot about Ian’s book coming out. I just want to hear everything right away. I guess I’ll have to wait for the book! lol.

    Reply
  179. Deutsche said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    @Keane:

    I think at least one biological child will be shpwn. Mabye even one of the twins. Don’t forget that Shiloh turns 3 these days…

    It will be interesting, but then not, because we all know that a photo op is coming.

    Reply
  180. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    According to SR she was screwing around with a young black male. Maybe her plan was to pass him off as the father but that wouldn’t explain why the Sudanese is pissed with Pitt. I’m just expanding on the surrogate theory there.

    Reply
  181. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    That must be a photo taken pre plastic suregeries don’t you think?….lol@Vittorio:

    Reply
  182. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    Maybe Ian can get Sugar to tell us what’s going on. In his way of course.. another riddle.

    Reply
  183. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    There have even been cases in the news of women in their 60’s bearing children. Science today can work wonders@Different Guest:

    Reply
  184. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    Kate, i think you are on to something. These people engineer a family with no concept of how their manipulation effects those involved. Wouldn’t be surprised, expecially with all the doubt surrounding the so called twin pregnancy. Angie is a baby collector, even James has said so. He once said that Angie is trying to make up to the underprivledged children of the world the bad childhood she and James suffered…yea right….i know. More crapola for publicity@Kate:

    Reply
  185. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    I wish I could understand what motivates these two human beings to perpetuate this fraud. If they wanted that tribe of kids, why don’t they raise them? They have priviledged and flexible enough careers to just put it on hold and do the family thing in ernest. What are they trying to achieve? What “lifestyle” are they trying to promote? That we should all just do whatever we want and to hell with our actual family obligations, just hire some help to do it, and then tell our friends and family how committed we are as parents? Or are we supposed to boldly say “children don’t really need parents around, nannies are fine for children’s development.” This is one messed up PR campaign they’ve created. Because they themselves cannot stick to ONE goal. It is my opinion that neither one of these responsibility-challenged people care one bit about those kids. I believe they regret ever having them, in their hearts. And now they are just using these kids as some kind of social statement, but for the life of me, I cannot understand what the statement is. They make me puke.

    Reply
  186. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    ruby ! chile ! you need more lovin with that attitude (((((((((((((((((( ruby )))))))))))))))), p.s. ssssssssssssttttt…..Caesar Milan sez@ruby:

    Reply
  187. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    Yep, and she begins filming The Bounty Hunter with Gerard Butler mid to late in June. I think that is only about four weeks rest up max. Eating right, good exersize, and lots of great female and male friends keep a body healthy, and we can all agree Jennifer has one hell of a healthy body!!!@Canuck:

    Reply
  188. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @Patty Anne:I couldn’t remember how old the oldest has been late sixties I think.

    Reply
  189. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    She’ll just claim it’s due to her phony Iroquoise indian roots….like she’s French yano….lol@Different Guest:

    Reply
  190. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    I@kick:
    LOL.I hear ya ,I tell ya I don’t really care what they do except that with all we know now about what goes on with her in that home, how unstable she is, it just seems unbelieveble that Brad would hold on to this Brand rather than getting his kids out of that mess and into a stable environent as soon as possible? That is the one thing that makes me question these sources. I believe Brad loves the kids and if she is trying to kill herself, on drugs, never around, always with different partners, possibly her brother then I really have to wonder would Brad allow this to go on to another full year? If he does then I have to wonder if these sources were lying because I can not believe he would put his kids through that for a Brand.

    Reply
  191. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    A tidbit i picked up somewhere in my googling, did you hear the talk about Brad being Merve Griffith’s boy toy? Supposedly when he first hit HW, he did a lot of “male bonding” to get started in the film industry, and he and Merve had a very close…VERY….close relationship i’m told. Said Brad began as Merve’s Pool Boy, and ended up his bunking buddy….lol It’s interesting, just do a google @benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  192. Different Guest said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    @Patty Anne:LOL!

    Reply
  193. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I don’t think that is true, that is something that has been passed around because he worked as a pool boy for Thom Racina.

    Reply
  194. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    Did any of you read that linked (possibly fake) story from Cannes where Brad makes the asinine remark (paraphrased) about his beautiful daughter born in Africa? Is this some kind of forewarning to the public that Z is the one he’s angling for? That was a really odd remark, even if it was a planted one….??? IMO.

    Reply
  195. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    And it was even on odd remark even if they’re still the happy, loving, free-spirited family they claim to be, no?

    Reply
  196. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    Jay leno did a skit on his Tonight Show last week with Brad character and Merv Griffith character connecting, ends with Brad smoking a ciggie in bed, and Merv popping up from under the covers grinning@Kate:

    Reply
  197. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    @Patty Anne:That sounds good, wonder if it’s on youtube.

    Reply
  198. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    Okay, part of the Jay Leno skit included Pitt being a pool boy, but for Merv. Knowing as we do that Pitt is Bi….i assumed it was based on some sort of fact, but suppose it was just for digs. Leno seems to have done quite a few skits including Pitt over the years
    @Kate:

    Reply
  199. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    Don’t know, but i;m not sure if i came across it googling Tonight Show, Jay Leno Skits, or BP..frankly, I’ve never googled so much in my life as i have since finding IAN’s blog…lol Perhaps an old TV guide?@Knowone:

    Reply
  200. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    Here’s the link to that strange quote by Brad about his “African” daughter. Top Brit posted it in the other thread. Cannes was my superbowl, I’m in post-game analysis. lol

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/3am/2009/05/22/brad-pitt-kills-off-rumours-of-rift-with-angelina-jolie-by-declaring-his-love-115875-21378637/

    Reply
  201. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    Anybody read anything into those new pics of AJ on the set? She’s wearing a belt (like Jen always wears) holding handcuffs and eating cake. Boy, the mind can run away with that one, eh?

    Reply
  202. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    @Patty Anne:I hear ya. I’m learning all kinds of new skills thanks to Ian and you guys. I just tried to post the link to the “article” about Brad’s “African daughter” story that Top Brit posted in the other thread, but it didn’t go through. I’ll have to study the instructions you just gave BB14. lol, who knew gossip could be such a fertile educational ground!

    Reply
  203. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    @cuze:
    I think those are for the film, not her own personal way of dress.

    Reply
  204. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    @Kate:
    Yeah, but I figured she’d make the most of a photo op moment to pass a message along. I know, I know.. I read too much into stuff.. it’s Sugar Ray’s riddle I tell ya.. I can’t help it. lol

    Reply
  205. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    lol are you kidding, oh my goodness. that is pretty funny, well I guess you can not contain a secret forever, one never knows, maybe he was involved with him, but if he was, he sure did not help him much in the early days.

    Reply
  206. harikari girl said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    This site seems to have become so contentious almost overnight and that really bums me out. The first time I posted, I came right out and said that I had not trusted Ian – I mean you get enough hits on your site and you can start making some money. I wondered if this whole thing was simply bullshit to help achieve a positive outcome for the owner of the site. But as I said in my initial post, I then saw his IUCTV broadcast – and that broadcast where I could actually hear him and watch he came across completely changed my mind – gutturally, I felt he was on the up and up.

    Anyway, when I posted that and that I had thought he’d been stringing everyone along and hadn’t trusted him for the first 2 months, not a single regular on this site attacked me. Keane, of all people, was very welcoming. Mia, Wynter – are you ok, please sit down so you don’t have a seizure or go into cardiac arrest.

    The simple fact is as follows: there is NO fanaticism on this site except for the likes of the MIa’s and Wynter’s and ‘God knows who’ that decide to show up here and launch personal attacks against any individual who dares to question Ms. Jolie’s PR machine and her frequent interviews to the universe about how honest and loving and unconniving and non-addictive and family oriented and in love and monogamous and completely how Un-Hollywood she is, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum. These are the people you attack – the people who choose to be free thinkers, possess a healthy amount of skepticism and choose to reserve the right to come to their own conclusions. How very sad it is then that such postings should make you so insecure that you feel it necessary to attack, attack, attack. Perhaps you should go away and find a site with a bunch of lemmings – a place where you can feel warm and soft and fuzzy and secure in your convictions regarding your Saint — Miss Angelina Jolie Voight.

    Reply
  207. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    @Patty Anne:Maybe a subtle dig at the Brand, ey? The interviews he’s had in the past with Holie haven’t gone too smoothly. Haven’t looked for those in the past with Brad. Leno seems more topical (and, like this, kinda subtle) these days than Letterman. Don’t know when that happened.

    Reply
  208. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    yes i think so. Especially since he is leaving the show soon, and turning it over to Conan O’Brian….one parting shot i think@Knowone:

    Reply
  209. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    @cuze:
    Cuze, I read also on the cake was because it was the someones birthday on the set, the director maybe. She looked frumpy on the RC but at the after party she looked thin, and her face was back to normal.

    Reply
  210. harikari girl said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    Sorry for the long post when Mia and Wynter aren’t even on today. I had just got through catching up on all the comments and read theirs and got ticked off.

    Reply
  211. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    @Patty Anne:I’ve been loving the SNL skits about the baby stealer. This is why I think the tide may be turnin for the dasterdly duo (fingers crossed and big wishes for a more sane tomorrow). Lol.

    Reply
  212. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    I wonder if IAN’s blockbuster will be about the mysterious twins? I don’t wish sickness/health problems on anyone, but something is deffinately off with the twins. Did any of you see the tv report of the woman from Houston, Tx who gave birth to twins who had different biological fathers? Now that was definately off. I remember from IUCTV program the 13th, Noah said about the twins, “They are a valuable commodity”….to the Brand, so therefore, they must be just holding them back hoping to generate great interest in photos in order to raise their (hee hee) selling price. I certainly hope they did the right thing in this baby photo ops for sale, and put moneys into trust funds for those children, without whom they’d have had no financial windfall. Knowing Angie’s feelings about her Bio’s having unfair advantages over her adoptees though, i seriously doubt she would give the bio’s a head up over the adoptees. She’s strange that way….encouraging competition between the children for her affection/approval at such an early age….

    Reply
  213. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    @harikari girl:I consider myself a very cool customer but I got real ticked off with those two characters yesterday my ownself. *snickers to self, must not let the rabids get my goat*

    Reply
  214. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    @Patty Anne:That poster Vag (I dig her, but yes, she’s very much a conspiracy theorist) over at FF (I don’t post there, but it’s a wealth of theories on these two) says People Magazine paid the $14 mil for a long-term contract, and SHE (not me, juries still out for me) thinks People is in on this scam. She thinks the scam will be complete and the money put into the fund when the first year photos are sealed and delivered, for the adoring public to wallow in their idols and their fakeness. Yes, I do dig that Vag woman and her theories. Kate, you know her posts over at FF?

    Reply
  215. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    @Knowone:
    yes she is bright but over the top the times I have read her, she always talks about voodoo

    Reply
  216. harikari girl said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    @Knowone: Me too. I’m generally pretty laid back, but when the nut jobs come on and start assassinating other people’s characters and name call and use racist or homophobic names, that’s when my cool goes out the window.

    Reply
  217. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    @Kate:I haven’t read any of those voo doo things, lol. But her moniker is some kind of hindu priestess name, and she seems very articulate and educated and also dubunks a lot of things that are considered widely believed among conspiracy whack jobs. She’s highly entertaining. She should start her own blog.

    Reply
  218. harikari girl said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    “She’s strange that way….encouraging competition between the children for her affection/approval at such an early age….”

    It makes absolute sense that she would do that. She moves these children around constantly, enrolls Mad into different lycees around the world only to pluck him out again thus not giving him the opportunity to make long lasting friendships. The same for all the other children. Thus the only thing that they have that is consistent is each other and “mommy” which then helps calm AJ’s enormous insecurities and makes the children faithful to her and her only. It’s a sick, twisted case of continuing to make the world revolve around only her. I truly believe that on some level she is completely aware of this and likely has purposely created this environment to ensure their ‘loyalty’ to her and her alone.

    Reply
  219. Knowone said on May 25th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    @harikari girl:Yes, forget about acting classes, Ms. Jolie needs to take some parenting classes, pronto!

    Reply
  220. I'm on the bidet said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:01 pm

    About the picture – what the heck is going on in the window in the upper left? Is that Michael Jackson checking out the kids??!?

    Reply
  221. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    lol… I never noticed that before.. too funny!!!

    Reply
  222. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:03 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I do and she’s looking so fine. Her soul is shining through!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  223. harikari girl said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    Link for AJ before and after plastic surgery:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2ZOxvbt978&feature=related

    Reply
  224. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    Lol…true, i especially appreciated the fangs and yellow eyes..@Vittorio:

    Reply
  225. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I’ve heard that about Ryan Seacrest but not Brad. It makes sense though. Merv was a very powerful man and if you’re a guy and you have to suck one (and not your natural inclination)……might as well be one with the most power right?

    Reply
  226. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    That’s quite an analogy, but in this case holds true i think….lol@Vittorio:

    Reply
  227. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:16 pm

    I think most people now realize that HW is a world unto it’s self and the people who want so badly to be a part of it for the most part, are willing to do whatever it takes to succeed. So many of the newer , young stars are druggies, alcoholics, making sex videos and letting them accidentally ( sure) find their way to the general public. HW is Hell’s World anymore. No one points out that baby buying, ignoring them while nannies raise them, selling photos of them , multiple sex partners, dogs, same sex threesomes, is WRONG! Morals are out the window, it’s all about power and that power enables them to create their own universe in which anything goes. The balance of Good and Evil is tipping in HW….and the Evil is winning i’m sorry to say. I never thought i hear people blasting a victim in a situation as they have Jennifer Aniston. She’s punnished daily for “allowing” a harlot, whore, psycho seduce her husband while making a film in which the entire production crew knew Jolie was shooting love scenes NAKED which is against rules for nude love scenes, yet no one had the balls to call her on it….I hope IAN’s book is indeed a true blockbuster and tells much more than he’s devulged here, i’d love to see all the dirt little Jolie secrets exposed.

    Reply
  228. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    @Kate:
    <Vag is the one who said she heard AJ would be going to a ahem…………place to rest soon (nuthouse). what do you think about that?

    Reply
  229. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:22 pm

    Ian, have you demoted our beloved Sugar Ray??? We haven’t had a good riddle in ages. Where is our little diva?

    Reply
  230. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    Canne winners announced: Brad did NOT win best actor….lol …. again!!!!!
    Actor – Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds

    Reply
  231. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I wonder if he made them sing “I’ve got a loveley bunch of coconuts”? hahaha

    Reply
  232. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    Probably still in Canne, sitting alongside the sea, sipping champagne…..lol@cuze:

    Reply
  233. cuze said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Well that’s cool.. but we expect a full report on all the celebs once he gets back. lol

    Reply
  234. Patty Anne said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    Definately, but he deserves a well earned break. Just bring us back the gossip! IS Angie going to be committed to a nut house anytime soon? Who will have custody of the children if she and Brad did have an annulment? IS Jamie still living in the rented house on Long Island with the kids? Common cutie pie, give@cuze:

    Reply
  235. redsox said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi, new here but been lurking awhile. Kate, your premise is that Brad loves those kids. And that is not a given or proven fact. His mouth says one thing but his actions say another. The biggest mystery for me has been why would anyone sane pick Jolie as the mother of their child(ren). Even if he was fooled by her for awhile, and I can’t beleive he’s that stupid (though very possibly he is) and/or he was trapped by Jolie getting pregnant with Shiloh, after her behavior towards Shiloh, why on earth would he have continued having kids with her? If his career and his notoriety are more important to him, then voila, he doesn’t love those children.

    To state, as you did, that either one of two “facts” are true: that if Brad allows the Brand to continue on then the sources aren’t true, is not logical. There are many more than two possibilities here. Just a thought…

    Reply
  236. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    @Vittorio:
    I don’t know, where did she hear that? I don’t read too much what they post just read the articles and links, but I do rememeber she was in contact with someone who claimed to know Jen but I don’t know what ever came of it. If the loons think we are bad, what do they think of FF? just curious..

    Reply
  237. Nope said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    So, is the main course going to be as disappointing as the “appetizer”?
    I mean, I’m thinking a follow up to “Angie has nannies”
    is:
    Angie had plastic surgery!
    or
    Angie likes taken men!
    or
    Angie has gotten too skinny!

    There’s really no limit to the ways you can disappoint us Ian….yet we keep coming back….

    Reply
  238. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Ok well Lainey reports that the Brange to not yell at each other and they are not splitting and she hints at pregnancy says Jolie said she could not wait to take the kids back to France this summer, this was at the party. Guess Lainey has not heard Brad will be in LA doing Moneyball, not France. She got all the reports from here apparently and does not believe them. I know she commented on all the emails she was getting awhile back. Bet she was worried, but now that she has her video of her Pitt Porn up today she is a happy little blogger. I really do hope this blockbuster is just as SR said it is, a monster.

    Reply
  239. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    @Kate:
    I am pasting what I copied from the link previously on the other thread.

    Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:57 am .
    @Patty Anne:</a
    Yeah, I’m not even a nurse and I can tell. Speaking of addictions…..you people have gotten me addicted to this site. I went to that FF site and saw the below post.

    by Vajranagini on Fri May 22, 2009 2:18 am

    Personally I don’t CARE if they break up or not; they are clearly IN HELL, so let it continue, say I! However I have a bit of inside data that leads me to believe that she will be in an INSTITUTION of some sort before long; maybe THAT’S what Brad is WAITING FOR! Think about it: once he has her “committed”, that way there is NO custody battle, she’s out of his life; he gets to look like a SAINT and gets FULL custody of those kids! CUI BONO? , eh?
    Vajranagini

    Reply
  240. Ty said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    Hello everyone – hope everybody enjoyed the long weekend. Worked all day and finally got a chance to come on and see the latest – doesn’t really surprise me – I always figured she just bothered with the kids for her precious photo ops!

    Reply
  241. stinky-inky said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:38 pm

    @Vittorio:
    I heard that about RS as well. Looks like he got some good business advice from Merv as well. With all the TV shows he’s producing RS is going to be a very wealthy man.

    Reply
  242. stinky-inky said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    @Vittorio:
    Let’s call it a nervous hospital, hmm, hmm.

    Reply
  243. Vittorio said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    That sound good. She is a very nervous girl!

    Reply
  244. LizzieButt said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Testing. Testing. 1-2-3.

    Reply
  245. TobyKat said on May 25th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    Testing

    Reply
  246. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Adding to your questions:

    Since IAN said both Brad and Ang have moved on to other partners , who are they?

    Is it a serious relationship?

    IAN what made you change your mind about Jen? About Two weeks ago you said look for a reconciliation, but in your broadcast I am told you said that will not happen.

    So what changed?

    Reply
  247. joanne said on May 25th, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    “Glory Days” …. Walker Lovejoy (6 episodes, 1990)
    – Precursed (1990) TV episode …. Walker Lovejoy
    – Tammy Tell Me True (1990) TV episode …. Walker Lovejoy
    – Triggs Mistaken Identity Crisis (1990) TV episode …. Walker Lovejoy
    – Whattya Wanna Do Tonight? (1990) TV episode …. Walker Lovejoy
    – Blastin’ Away the Blues (1990) TV episode …. Walker Lovejoy
    (1 more)
    Too Young to Die? (1990) (TV) …. Billy Canton
    The Image (1990) (TV) …. Steve Black
    “thirtysomething” …. Bernard (1 episode, 1989)
    – Love and Sex (1989) TV episode …. Bernard
    “Growing Pains” …. Jeff / … (2 episodes, 1987-1989)
    – Feet of Clay (1989) TV episode …. Jonathan Keith
    – Who’s Zoomin’ Who? (1987) TV episode …. Jeff
    - Black Tickets (1989) TV episode …. Rick Austin
    “Head of the Class” …. Chuck (1 episode, 1989)
    – Partners (1989) TV episode …. Chuck
    A Stoning in Fulham County (1988) (TV) …. Theodore ‘Teddy’ Johnson
    “21 Jump Street” …. Peter (1 episode, 1988)
    – Best Years of Your Life (1988) TV episode …. Peter
    “Dallas” …. Randy (4 episodes, 1987-1988)
    – Farlow’s Follies (1988) TV episode …. Randy
    – Marriage on the Rocks (1988) TV episode …. Randy
    – Daddy’s Little Darlin’ (1987) TV episode …. Randy
    – Brother, Can You Spare a Child? (1987) TV episode …. Randy
    “Another World” (1964) TV series …. Chris (unknown episodes, 1987)
    … aka “Another World: Bay City”
    According to wikipedia

    Reply
  248. PFAB said on May 25th, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    Ah, the old red herring raises its tired old head. Asking Ian to provide some proof or even some details that can be verified about his many stories is somehow unacceptable at this site. It amusingly invites sarcasm and paranoid accusations. Why freak out every time Ian’s credibility is questioned? Why take it so personally? This site is not about its posters. Or is it?

    No “journalist” would complain about such questions or prodding. A journalist would actually be happy to provide those details because that is what they do. They do not just repeat rumors. They seek out the truth and provide truthful details. Details that can be verified by others. It is Ian’s self proclaimed job to uncover facts. Why can’t he uncover these simple facts with all his alleged undercover teams and inside sources?

    People can believe what they want but a thinking person would question all these tall tales when they are given no proof – no corroboration – whatsoever.

    Trying to twist the nature of my posts and my posting history here is rather lame and ineffective. I call it as I see it. I haven’t been here in quite a while and I am sure that I haven’t posted more than maybe 15 times since I first saw this site months ago. But be my guest and feed your fantasies and psychological needs as you so desire

    This pretty much sums it up. They don’t care if it’s true or false. They just need a reason to continue harboring hatred . This site is just a haven for mental patients with downtime.

    Reply
  249. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    Brad made that comment about them getting married when gays could in Esquire 2006, it would be interesting to know when they did get married because of that and because Pax was adopted Feb 07 I believe. such frauds

    Reply
  250. Her Majesty said on May 25th, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    @HisHighness:You are so full of shit ian I can smell your stink from here. Surely the poor folk who trust you with their lives are starting to doubt it all now????

    This is old news, like the rest of the shit you write. Famous Best Selling author my arse.

    Reply
  251. Z said on May 25th, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    @Knowone:
    I use to love Letterman…when his suits started fitting properly, I became disillusioned…lol.

    Reply
  252. Kate said on May 25th, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    Oh and that was the interview he said he does love a gay story. LOL. With Jay Leno and his little skit and Ted saying that pretty boy Pine from Star Trek (who is gay and wanted to take his boyfriend to his premier and the studio went ape) will ptobably go the route Brad Pitt did early in his career , with many questionable relationships. Thinking back to SR and the Kickapoo story where we thought Brad was raped , didn’t it seem he was also saying all his relationships were ????

    Now I get that he is bisexual, but are people now trying to say he is a long suffering gay boy who has Bern stuck in all these relationships and he has been bored with them , SR called him yerstergay, so is Brad coming out ?

    Reply
  253. Her Majesty said on May 25th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    @Liz E.:Keane gets butt hurt, because Keane is Ian. VeRIfied.

    Reply
  254. Her Majesty said on May 25th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    @cuze:v Sugar Ray’s posts weren’t as popular and Ian was copping flack because of the pathetic nature of them, so he stopped it. He’s just writing under his and keane’s moniker now. jmo

    Reply
  255. justhelping said on May 25th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    Hello ladies. Haven’t been feeling well, so haven’t been around. I just caught up and it appears an attack is underway. Hmm. Wonder who is going to win the war? I just found this about BP in the next “Sex in the City” film. Mario Catone wants BP to be his lovah.
    http://www.imnotobsessed.com/2009/05/11/brad-pitt-to-play-mario-cantones-gay-lover-in-next-sex-and-the-city-movie

    Reply
  256. ruby said on May 25th, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    @Knowone:

    True and Vay form Female First is also a self declaired voodoo priestess, a former homewrecker and someone who gave her only child up for adoption only to blame the adoptive mum later when the boy turned out gay! Nice lady? Looks like she is projecting her own issues onto Jolie.

    Reply
  257. justhelping said on May 25th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    This one is full of fluff, but I cracked up when it said she works out 5-6 hours a day after the twins and is so worried about staying the world’s sexiest woman.
    http://english.pravda.ru/society/showbiz/27-02-2009/107163-angelina_jolie-0
    don’t get me wrong, post partum is no joke; however, if she did not deliver the twins where did the tantrums come from?

    Reply
  258. justhelping said on May 25th, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    Okay, this is messed up.
    http://www.red-alerts.com/just-plain-foolish/angelina-jolie-a-bigger-douche-bag-than-alec-baldwin/

    Reply
  259. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:02 am

    @justhelping:
    Well Shiloh turns 3 yesrs old on Wedensday, they don’t make a fuse for her like they do Maddox.

    Reply
  260. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:10 am

    Note: The following quote is from a supposed “source” of BP. Check it out…the reference to the kids.

    “Brad made a point at Cannes to show he and Angelina are very much in love and together and he plans to do the same while promoting this movie elsewhere,” reports a source close to the couple. “They are very aware of the effect all the talk of their so-called relationship troubles has on their kids and this is one way to show a united front.”

    What? How would “all the talk” effect their kids? Who do the kids interact w/ other than each other? Can you imagine Maddox hanging out in a grocery line reading Star/InTouch while Pax skims through US…and, of course, Zahara and Shiloh’s BFF’s are just all abuzz! Yep. Now I get why a “united front” is needed. Oh, and the twins are now able to wobble their way into where the “grown-ups” hang out and are just horrified by the gossip!

    Oh, the whore-er! I mean, the horror! — of it all. Gasp. Isn’t this all just the pitts?

    Reply
  261. ani said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:28 am

    @Kate:

    Chris Pine is already starting the questionable relationships with some tart from ‘the hills’. when will HW understand we don’t care about orientation? he’s still hot!

    Reply
  262. dani said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:36 am

    I don’t know if AJ and BP will stay together, but this story is so untrue. Got to IMBd and check out Angie’s film schedule. She had three films come out in 2008 which means she worked on them between 2007 and 2008. One was Kung Fu Panda which is done in a studio. The other was the Changling which took three months to film and the other Wanted which was half done by 2008. Anyhow, the only movie she is doing in 2009 is Salt.
    She has cut WAY WAY back on her schedule and if Mr. Halperin had done his homework he would have noticed this before writing this false entry,.

    Reply
  263. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:24 am

    @dani:
    yes well between the one film and the six weeks of prep before each film and the retakes afterwards and the promo tours and running off to get her picture taken with soldiers and refugees and inviting pole dancing bunny whores to slip and slide i

    n piss and poo and bumping and grinding with A Rod and pals getting naked and nasty at his apartment and having beach blanket bingo banging slumber parties with her girls while downing the finer liquor and drugs offered , ah well, it is certainly a good thing there are nannies for this

    Reply
  264. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:32 am

    @SZ:
    Well if he had professed his love for her to Ann Curry instead of acting like she had thrown acid in his face he would not have to continue to try and convince anyone of anything. I suppose coming home with mommy would help and taking off Jens necklace, oh and maybe he should not have signed those papers to have his marriage annulled. Lol What cua think?

    Reply
  265. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    @ani:
    you would be surprised how many people do…

    Reply
  266. DebFrmHell said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:37 am

    @SZ:
    LOL! If the kids saw one of the tabloids phtos of BP/AJ they woud nudge each other and ask if those people weren’t the nanny’s assistants…

    Reply
  267. Togi said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:44 am

    None of the new posts are showing up! The home page shows 260 + posts, but when I click on the blog title, only 51 appear. I read a post earlier where the same problem was occurring. Test … test … Is this working????? Blaaahhh.

    Reply
  268. Alif said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:59 am

    @Vittorio:
    Both elections were stolen according to sources like author/lawyer, Vincent Bugliosi and Robert Kennedy Jr.
    Bugliosi wrote a book detailing how the Supreme Court handed the election to Bush.
    RFK Jr. wrote in ROLLING STONE magazine about how Ohio was tilted in Bush’s favor. Plenty of thwarting of voters, esp in minority districts, etc!

    Reply
  269. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:00 am

    Hey guys, getting on here really, really late. Reviewed some of the earlier postings and, Kate, I agree with you, IAN, does have a book coming out so he will give us what he can right now. I am really glad that he is calling AJ out, because I NEVER understand how she can come up with the same story over and over again. ‘I will stop my film work and stay at home with my children’ – paraphrasing – but no reporter EVER calls her out on the same old story. If I were a reporter, I would ask the hard questions, but if you work for a ‘mainstream’ magazine, etc., they would probably get fired. That’s why IAN can ask the hard questions but in a MILLION years he would NEVER get an interview w/ AJ because, I believe, she is afraid of him. Anyone still up?? Can’t sleep, was Memorial Day here so I’m taking Tuesday off as an extra day. I’ll be here for awhile, so if anyone is around, I’ll respond!

    Reply
  270. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:08 am

    @Alif:
    Just LOVE Vincent Bugliosi (genious!), not crazy about RFK, Jr. (What’s wrong w/ his voice anyway? Ever notice that?) Simply cannot stand how RFK, Jr. is always about protecting his scum of cousins re rape/murder, etc. And, although Teddy Kennedy has done amazing work for the Senate, I just cannot get over that Mary Jo Kopechne scandal. Wasn’t man enough to stand up for that woman or get her help before she died. Way off topic here. But, man, what a douche.

    Reply
  271. meg said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:10 am

    A woman who choosed to work (instead of be a desperate housewife) is not a bad mother. She needs to work but she also loves her children. The two are not incompatible.She doesn’t love her children less than a woman who stay at home.

    Reply
  272. ruby said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:16 am

    Now you have revealed yourself Ian! Did you start this site as a PR attempt to strengthen Jen`s position? Strange how you had to delete the last 50 posts that including slight criticism of your favorite movie star while you have no problems slaming a mother of six!

    Reply
  273. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:18 am

    @meg:
    Meg, I do agree with you. My mother was a physician with her own practice and had terrible hours, but she still always spent time with us. However, if she made the ‘money’ AJ does, I believe she would have had quit her practice to spend all the time she could with us. She was working to give us a great education, which she did and ‘kudos’ to her. I know my Mom’s work was all about saving people’s lives, certainly not for the ‘glory’. And certainly more stressful than making movies. But, it seems AJ still wants to be ‘relevant’ in the movie industry and although already has enough money to retire – why is she always talking about taking a BIG break and spend her time with her 6 children? A little vainglorious to me. JMO! :)

    Reply
  274. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:21 am

    @DebFrmHell: Hhahahah! Loved it!

    Reply
  275. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:27 am

    @Kate: Mee thinks he…wait….”thinks” just threw me. I seem to lose parts of my brain when I contemplate that interview…or the “inner view” of the Curry poo and the entire “do” of BP’s hue.

    Reply
  276. Different Guest said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:28 am

    Any one else having a problem with this thread, in order to see more than 51 posts I have to add a post.

    Reply
  277. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:34 am

    @Different Guest:
    Not having a problem here. Something seems to be off on your end. Do you do a ‘refresh’ after your post. I just can’t scroll through 200 plus posts, ’cause that would take me forever. When you log in – do you see how many posts there are? And still only have to post something to get into this thread?? Wow, I’m sorry you’re having a problem. Let me know if you get my post here!

    Reply
  278. Togi said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:39 am

    @Different Guest:
    AAAAAAhhhh! Mee tooo! (It’s driving me crazy!) If you click over on the right side (on the new posts) it seems to take you to the right place. At least it HAS worked … kinda. I may just go to bed early for a change. :-)

    Reply
  279. Alif said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:40 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Very interesting, indeed! Not surprised that BP was Merv Griffin’s “boy toy”.

    Merv Griffin was filthy rich and he had so much charisma. He had show biz savvy like no one else, it seems. He started as a big band singer. He had a big hit with “I’ve Got a Lovely Bunch of Cocoanuts” around 1950.
    He couldn’t hit it big in the movies despite being featured in Warner Bros. films along side superstars like Doris Day.
    Then came his talk show. He was a natural. But as to how he got those mega-millions, I think it had to do with real estate.
    He was sued by a male dancer who alleged he made promises of financial help which didn’t happen; yet his rep wasn’t hurt a bit.
    It’s also widely reported that he gave Ryan Seacrest his start up the ladder. Ryan also can be said to have a “sensitivity chip, or two” missing. Ever see him on American Idol? That guy can be pretty cruel, sometimes.
    But maybe he’s inspired by Simon Cowell, who once said a less-than-handsome contestant, “looks like a bush baby”. Crikey!

    Reply
  280. Togi said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:42 am

    @N’other Name:
    @Togi:
    N’othe Name … I have been having the same problem, as stated above! The home page shows 260 + posts, but when I click on the blog title, only 51 posts appear. It’s really weird.

    Reply
  281. Different Guest said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:44 am

    @N’other Name:That’s what’s peculiar, home page lists the correct # of posts, click on it and only get 51, try to refresh still get 51, post, get all.

    Reply
  282. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:45 am

    @Different Guest: Same thing happened to me — I checked in late and when I posted I thought I was the “last” for quite some time. After I posted, refreshed, and scrolled down, I discovered many posts that hadn’t “been there” — it’s taken forever to catch up. I didn’t know anyone had even posted to me until now…which is why my responses were so late.

    Reply
  283. Different Guest said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:45 am

    @Alif:He created Jeopardy and Wheel of Fortune, and a couple of other game shows I think, those made him beaucoup bucks.

    Reply
  284. Different Guest said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:49 am

    IMO one way for AJ to salvage her career and 86 the kids would be to take ahem a “rest” in some kind of institution. Didn’t Jenny Shmizu(sp) make some remark along the lines that AJ would tire of being a mother?

    Reply
  285. dvz said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:50 am

    I sent Ian this email re” Blockbusters”, or rather the lack therof:

    Subject header: Nearly Tuesday on the West Coast

    *****UPDATE***** Our biggest Brangie story yet coming Monday

    So where is it?

    I am new to this site but have known of your other reporting for ages, yet nothing you have been promising or even hinted at recently has come to any sort of substantial light.

    Feeling like a patsy, and I have no-one to blame but myself.

    If any or even most of this is true, you will win many accolades, yet now all you seem interested in is getting more hits on your site

    Each “reveal” of stars/celebs you have reported on lead nothing past a dead end.

    Your “scoops” of Brangie, have been even more limp.

    I do wish you the best of luck, however. We need journalists like you. One bit of advice: either stay quiet until you have something absolutey smashing and provable or stay quiet at home instead of throwing fistfulls of pasta just to see what might stick to the wall…for a few seconds.

    Best wishes,

    Reply
  286. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:52 am

    @Different Guest: Yes, that’s where his money was made BIG TIME! He was laughing all the way to his grave — gleefully living mainly in Florida on his fabulous yacht.

    Reply
  287. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:54 am

    @Alif:
    Wow, I’ve got to scroll back to the earlier posts!! Just loved Merv Griffin when I was a kid. He had such a natural talent of making everyone laugh. Did not know that BP was Merv’s ‘toy boy’. But Merv was pretty much out – didn’t affect him in the least. And, I do know he made A LOT of money in real estate.

    Haven’t watched American Idol this year (the only time I didn’t for years), but, MAN, did Simon Cowell ‘diss Ryan about his sexual proclivity at one point. Then, Ryan went back @ Simon re Terry Seymour, something in the vain about ‘yeah, she’s really going to be a keeper!’ Simon just laughed and it really was funny, ’cause the ‘digs’ went back and forth a couple of years ago. Think they both swing both ways and Ryan is always trying to protect his image, ’cause his work never ends. Hmmm. Now, I’ll have to go back and read what was said in the previous posts. Like, I said before, got in here very, very late. Thanks for that info!!

    Reply
  288. dvz said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:55 am

    I sent Ian this email re” Blockbusters”, or rather the lack therof, but when I hit submit, I got a message saying “duplicate comment, looks like you already said that) even though I only hit the add comment once. I’ll try again, and if if comes through twice, my aplolgies, and if doesn’t come at all, I’m quitting this site.

    Subject header: Nearly Tuesday on the West Coast

    *****UPDATE***** Our biggest Brangie story yet coming Monday

    So where is it?

    I am new to this site but have known of your other reporting for ages, yet nothing you have been promising or even hinted at recently has come to any sort of substantial light.

    Feeling like a patsy, and I have no-one to blame but myself.

    If any or even most of this is true, you will win many accolades, yet now all you seem interested in is getting more hits on your site

    Each “reveal” of stars/celebs you have reported on lead nothing past a dead end.

    Your “scoops” of Brangie, have been even more limp.

    I do wish you the best of luck, however. We need journalists like you. One bit of advice: either stay quiet until you have something absolutey smashing and provable or stay quiet at home instead of throwing fistfulls of pasta just to see what might stick to the wall…for a few seconds.

    Best wishes,

    Reply
  289. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:05 am

    @dvz:
    Hey, it did come through! And you are not a ‘patsy’! Although, I like that your message for all intents was very positive as you wished IAN the best of luck. Listen, I really think this guy is the ‘true’ deal. He has always said he doesn’t make a ‘dime’ for all the posts he gets. He is really more interested in giving us just some info before his book comes out. I agree, w/ some of your points, but you are very gracious in your comments and wishing IAN the best of luck. Don’t quit this site – just maybe take in a little, take it for what it is and then wait for IAN’s book. IAN has the guts to put stuff out there, however, attorneys, etc. could be hampering him – but just wait for his book. Review his blog, if you don’t want to comment, that’s fine but, once again, you did come across very gracious. Some of us do get frustrated although we have to see how this plays out. ‘Cause the ‘Brangie’ machine is a little more powerful ’cause all of their attorney’s waiting to attack IAN. JMO. Thanks for your post!

    Reply
  290. Alif said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:13 am

    @N’other Name:
    RKF,Jr. was taught early on to contribute to his fellow citizens of the world, because he had luxuries too many people of the world don’t have.

    His loyalty to his cousin is something I admire him for because if he felt the reverse he wouldn’t be a Kennedy.
    Teddy made a huge mistake back then. The spirits he willingly poured into his body took over. He wasn’t in charge. He was so sloshed that he couldn’t think straight; like I said, the spirits were in charge.
    He handled it very badly, and he had no chance for the presidency after that. We couldn’t trust him anymore. And we felt very badly for Mary Jo’s family, and regretted the future she’d never have.

    But now he’s had a long, long career of helping his fellow citizens. And he has many friends across the aisle. I read that he was saying his farewell to family and friends. And expressing sorrow for his numerous mistakes. I think he treated his beautiful ex-wife like crud! She became an alcoholic as a result.
    The main thing is that he makes his amends with his Creator, imo!

    Reply
  291. Alif said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:16 am

    @Vittorio:
    Sorry, I replied to an earlier post. Your subsequent post very well explained the earlier ones. Mine would not have been posted as explanatory, but would have been one of agreement.

    Reply
  292. Alif said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:32 am

    Wow, it’s 1:25a.m. here in So. Calif. US of A!
    Gotta relax a bit before I use my method of piling the Z’s. (I make boring lists, starting from A to Z. Never reach Z) (For example, I select a song that starts with A, then I select a celeb, who isn’t known for singing. One example: I select Alec Baldwin to sing Ain’t No Mountain High Enough, then Ben Affleck to sing, Buddy, Can You Spare a Dime? , then on to C, D, etc. I’m normally asleep halfway thru the alphabet. I also use the A-Z for many other topics.e.g. Name past historical figures. Aristotle, Blackbeard the PIrate, etc!)

    Check you, tomorrow!

    Reply
  293. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:51 am

    @Alif:
    You are right, Alif. I think now Teddy is making his amends and I do believe that our Creator will forgive him. I really think he has done so much for this country and he was the ‘most’ powerful senator in history, and was truly a benefit to our country in the end because of his good acts after all his mistakes. I wish him well on his journey to the afterlife. I know that he has many regrets in his life but, he did, in the end, do so much for our country. What is the saying “those who judge, will be the most judged in the afterlife’ – or something to that effect.

    Although, w/ RFK, Jr., he has ALWAYS staunchly refused to believe (or admit) that William Kennedy Smith (who was accused of rape – and that poor girl did not even want to go into that trial – and her face was always covered & really got screwed because he was found innocent – saw him @ a high-end party in Chicago, arrogant SOB) – just as RFK, Jr. ‘defended’ Michael Skakel, who was convicted of the murder of Martha Moxley. Then, again, Michael Kennedy (son of RFK) was charged of statutory rape of the babysitter. Now, even, JFK, Jr. did not agree with that stance – what did he call it? “The poster boys of bad behavior” – then Joseph Kennedy wanted his marriage annulled after years and years w/ his 1st wife and children, to basically say that this marriage wasn’t the real deal. Oh, he got it annulled. With the rich & famous, they usually always get off on these charges. You know what, I’m 1st generation Irish, I go back to the ’sod’ at least 2 times a year & there is ALWAYS a picture of JFK hanging on their walls. And, those guys aren’t even close to 1st generation Irish. Really, I did agree with John F. Kennedy, Jr. Poor soul! But, such a very arrogant family! JMO!!!

    Reply
  294. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:16 am

    Wow, where’s Keane when you need her?? Probably busy at work – that little “Oxford” genious!! Always, 6 hours behind you, Keane. Would love to know your thoughts on this one. I just never agreed w/ this whole “Kennedy Dynasty”. What a load of cr*p! Call me cynical, if you wish – a lot of Americans & ‘old school Irish’ may not agree with me but, whatever. I remember, my father saying ‘long, long’ time ago that JFK was a serial sex addict. My Mom refused to believe that, until much later when it all came out. Still, the guy was a great speaker and had the best sense of humour (notice that I used the ‘brit’ spelling – oh, and also Canadian – ’cause, apparently, it’s the Queen’s English!) Also, agree with you on your previous comments about the ‘Royal Family’ – NEVER been a fan myself. Altho, poor Diana – married to a total gay – or, in reverse, he was in love with Camilla!??? Never understood that sh*t – however, wasn’t it reported that Camilla was on the same yacht when Charles and Diana were on their honeymoon?? Maybe, it just meant that he had his gay lover there & not Camilla. I can’t figure this out but, that poor girl, suffered because of that fug-ugly guy, Charles. No offence meant to those who love the royal family. Ignore my comments if those of you are fans of them. Just loved Diana, thought she got a raw deal! JMO! XO

    Reply
  295. JinxyGal said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:18 am

    Where have all the comments gone? There were nearly 300 and now there are only 50?

    Reply
  296. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:26 am

    @Different Guest:
    @JinxyGal:
    Wow, you guys, you are so TOTALLY getting the same problem. Hey, Different Guest, if you have not already seen JinxyGal’s comment – here it is! Don’t know what the problem is!

    JinxyGal said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:18 am
    Where have all the comments gone? There were nearly 300 and now there are only 50?

    And, JinxyGal – here is Diifferent Guest comment:
    Any one else having a problem with this thread, in order to see more than 51 posts I have to add a post.

    What the HEY is going on here???

    Reply
  297. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:29 am

    P.S. You guys, Don’t want to log out here, ’cause I may actually get the same problem!!!???
    Hmmm???

    Reply
  298. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:33 am

    @Togi:
    Oh no, Togi, just went back a little & you have the same problem as Different Guest and JinxyGal. Wow!! Although, you are probably in bed now. XO Talk soon, but I can’t sleep for the life of me. Thank goodness, I have Tuesday off tomorrow!!

    Reply
  299. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:42 am

    it shows normal for me 299 posts ,I signed off and back in to check also..strange..Twilight Zone

    Reply
  300. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:45 am

    @Kate:
    Yeah, talk about the Twilight Zone – I didn’t dare sign off just in case. Although, I was thinking of saving this site, not logging out but, signing in again just for kicks. Not going to try it, tho. How are you Kate??

    Reply
  301. jan said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:47 am

    morning all it is a beautiful day in south africa today and i must say this is the first year we are having 3 seasons in one day wierd. re anal jolie not being a good mother if i had her money and a man that can support me i would give up my career for at least a couple of years so that i could be a full time mom until my kids where older and only make one movie every 3 years to stay revelant. look at other actresses that have husbands to support them they have done less movies to be a mother to their kids. kids first 6 years are the most important of their lives and she could still have 2 nannies to help but the kids would bond with her more than the nannies as she is there for them, i wonder if the twins know her at all as since their birth they have had more nanny time than mommy and daddy time. i don’t know if ian is telling the truth or not but peewee is now all of a sudden going to be away and filming for 4 months while mommy stays behind that is funny as before they where never apart and now they are more alone than ever in the last 5 years. but then most relationships become old after 5 years and the lust and passion becomes comfortable and you start taking one another for granted. must say the picture a cannes where peewee is glancing at one of the female stars looks very suspicious like he would rather have been near her than the living corpse and the smirk on his old mug on the carpet like he thought jolie tit was a joke and he wanted to laught was funny. i love this train wreck and hope it lasts another couple of years they both look fugly and like shit i i love it the ungly inside is starting to show on the outside. jmo

    Reply
  302. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 4:53 am

    @jan:
    Jan, you make me laugh! Talk about a ‘run’ on sentences!! Hey, what time is it there over in S.A.? I am now at 4:51 am – so what time are you at?? Raining like a bandit over here, not going to be a beautiful day! Nice to hear from SOMEONE at this point!! Like your analysis, tho, right on target!

    Reply
  303. Astro said on May 26th, 2009 at 5:03 am

    ‘HELLO!’ reveals the truth about Brad and Angelina’s ‘crisis’

    None of the stories are true”, said one friend on the rumours of an immiment break-up. Pick up your copy of HELLO! to find out what really goes on behind closed doors with Brad and Angelina

    http://www.hellomagazine.com/film/200905261280/brad/angelina/hello/1/

    Reply
  304. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 5:09 am

    @Astro:
    So, Astro, what do you think, that this is ‘true’ or just hype?? Just wondering ’cause it seems like PR to me, but what do I know??

    Reply
  305. meg said on May 26th, 2009 at 5:44 am

    @N’other Name:
    Name, you can be a woman who want to works because you can’t imagine stay at home with your children:
    -You want to see other people.
    -You like your job.
    This does not make you a bad mother. Brad also could stay at home with children. Why don’t you ask the question about Brad?

    Reply
  306. testing123 said on May 26th, 2009 at 5:47 am

    testing123

    Reply
  307. Astro said on May 26th, 2009 at 5:48 am

    @N’other Name:

    I don’t know if it is true or false!…Unfortunately, I don’t have spies, undercover microphones, I don’t have the ability to read the Brangie’s minds or whatever spy accesories to see behind the close doors of that people. I just put the info that I find, and the words coming from Brad telling the world that he has a beautiful family and he is in love with Angie.

    Which magazine is more trusted: Hello, Starmagazine, People, US, Intouch, Life&Stile, National Enquirer, Internet blogger?

    So How Can I Know who is telling the true?. I think at this SHOW, everybody is earning a lot of money including them.

    Now..to make a lot of people and Ian happy with all of these rumors. Here it is:

    This week’s GRAZIA: The truth behind Brangelina’s show of unity!

    http://www.graziadaily.co.uk/LatestIssue

    Reply
  308. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 5:59 am

    @meg:
    I think the issue over AJ isn’t that she works or not, it’s got more to do with the fact that she tries to portray herself as the world’s best mother (the ploy of “no wonder Brad left that selfish Jen who wouldn’t give him kids, so no I’m not a homewrecker, it’s all Jen’s fault”). Which, if she is leaving her kids with nannies 24/7 including when she’s not working, would be utter BS. Which, if she only drags the kids out for photo ops to “prove” her fabulous mothering skills, would be a travesty of what being a good mother is all about. Which, if the only purpose of having kids is to act as props for her public image, is monstrous really. Brad is not the one whose public persona relies on being “the best mom ever”.

    Reply
  309. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:03 am

    @meg:
    Yeah, Meg, I ALWAYS ask the same question of Brad!!!! Now, if I CHOSE to have 6 children, I, with their money, could also see ALL the people IN THE WORLD w/ their connections, would like my job (here and there, like AJ said), but would ALSO make MY children as my PRIORITY. But, if you decide to have children, adopt, biologically, etc., THEY become your priority and, that’s that! And, since AJ has said REPEATEDLY that she wants to stay at home with her children – WTF – is that statement alll about?????????? Get over yourself. Obviosly, career means more to you than anything, moron!

    Reply
  310. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:09 am

    @Astro:
    Thanks for that, Astro. At least you are ‘objective’ as opposed to these other idiots. XO

    Reply
  311. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:12 am

    @N’other Name:
    Although, I’m guessing you are not a ‘brain surgeon’ – just a guess here!!!

    Reply
  312. why said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:14 am

    why can I only see 51 comments when there are over 300, come on what the heck.
    I WANT TO READ THE NEW COMMENTS!

    Reply
  313. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:18 am

    <@meg:
    This was meant for you MEGGGG!!!!

    Although, I’m guessing you are not a ‘brain surgeon’ – just a guess here!!!

    Reply
  314. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:33 am

    @why:
    OH, for the life of me, I DO NOT GET THIS!!! Did you even get this ‘why’???

    Reply
  315. N'other Name said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:37 am

    @ His Highness:

    Are you even getting these comments that your loyal posters cannot see more than 51 comments?? What is that all about? Is someone shutting you down in some way?? Just a question, but there have been SEVERAL comments from posters that cannot even see even close to all of our comments?? Hmmm???

    Reply
  316. Constant Gardner said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:39 am

    @stinky-inky:
    omg lol. gonna eat a biskit after the nervous hospital, hmmmm, hmmmmm, with mustard.

    Reply
  317. luka said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:41 am

    Hmmm…cannot see more than 51 comments…I see from the RSS feed that others having the same problem.
    Hope tis fixed soon :) I miss my daily fix

    Reply
  318. Lizzieb said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:42 am

    The big question is what moron carries a kid wearing a dress that’s dragging on the ground? How she did not go arse over tit and inflict brain damage on that poor kid is a mystery.

    Reply
  319. keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:42 am

    Aw poor Liz E. getting all confused and posting the same post under a different username, think you might have outed yourself there Liz E. – time to adopt a new username!

    Oh and to the idiot who said it had been verified that I am Ian that’s so fucking hilarious, please do tell me how it has oh wise one?!

    But for the benefit of all the fools on the net such as yourself I will now do the noble thing and say I AM IAN! Come on guys let’s have our Spartacus moment!

    Reply
  320. Jalyn said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:45 am

    why can i only see 51 comments? any ideas?

    Reply
  321. ruby said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:45 am

    See that is what I call investigative journalsim! Several US Weekly covers about the Gosselins that led to the following conclusion:

    Kate: I Don’t Know if Jon and I Will Be Together Next Year
    Monday May 25, 2009

    Kate Gosselin and Jon Gosselin of TLC’s “Jon & Kate Plus 8″ attend Discovery Upfront at Jazz at Lincoln Center April 2, 2009 in New York City.
    Amy Sussman/WireImage.com CelebNews@Usmagazine.com! – Kate: I Don’t Know if Jon and I Will Be Together Next Year ShareThisJon and Kate Gosselin don’t appear on camera at the same time until 45 minutes into tonight’s premiere of Jon & Kate Plus 8.

    Kate — who shoots majority of her testimonial scenes solo (the couple usually appears as a pair) — admits she and Jon may not be together for much longer.

    See adorable photos of the kids in the Gosselin family album.

    “I am thinking this possibly could be our last family picture together,” she says of a photo taken at the sextuplets’ fifth birthday party. “I don’t know…parents of multiples have, like, triple the divorce rate, and I was thinking we were gonna beat that. I don’t know if I can say that anymore. Very swiftly, we turned into two different people, and that’s just hard. I’ve tried for six months to figure out what the problem is, or remedy the problem. It’s so complicated.”

    Adds Jon: “I think it was good for them [the kids] to see their mom and dad together in one place, even though it’s been tough right now. Like I said, we will come together for our kids regardless of our relationship. We have to make a plan and settle jointly what we’re going to do. There are good times and bad times and nothing is perfect.”

    See photos of stars caught cheating.

    In the episode, Jon spends a weekend away while Kate plans the sextuplets’ fifth birthday party solo. She’s seen struggling to drive the 15-person van, carry party supplies and control the children alone. She also complains about the paparazzi cameras to the reality TV cameras that trail her.

    “It’s a lot,” she admits. “I would be lying if I sat here and said, ‘Oh, I’m handing it great.’ It’s not fine.”

    See photos of reality love gone bad.

    The couple of nearly 10 years open up about their relationship issues. Jon denies his affair, despite more than five sources confirming it to Us Weekly, while Kate (who had her own “inseparable” relationship with her bodyguard) admits she’s “angry” at Jon for the way he’s been acting.

    “Slowly, I’ve seen him almost resent the duties [of being a parent],” she tells the camera. “I know it’s a lot to take care of eight kids. I’m traveling a lot, he’s frustrated a lot. I think he’s angry at me. He doesn’t really feel great about me.

    “Have I been hard on him for almost the last 10 years that we’ve been married? I would never deny that. I’ve always regretted it. Have I pushed him to this? I don’t feel like I have. I feel like everyone is responsible for their own actions.

    Check out more controversial reality stars.

    “I have a lot of anger. Because this is not where we’re supposed to be. This is not what I envisioned for us. Not what I envisioned for him. He’s made some very poor decisions, and we all have to live with them,” she continues.

    Jon admits the show has “become a business,” and Kate laments that she’s away so often on book signings, her kids sometimes accidentally call her by their baby-sitters’ names.

    “That kills you…I pour that mommy guilt on myself a lot,” she says.

    See how much money is at stake if Jon and Kate quit their show.

    At the fifth birthday party, Jon and Kate’s relationship is clearly strained, as the newest issue of Us Weekly reports.

    “I drove separately,” Jon admits, while Kate breaks down into tears while preparing the cake and ignores her husband.

    The show ends with the family having a barbecue and Jon and Kate acting cordial, yet removed, on camera.

    Tell Us: What did you think of the premiere?

    Join Us on Facebook and Twitter for even more up to the minute celebrity news and photos!

    Reply
  322. Lizzieb said on May 26th, 2009 at 6:51 am

    @keane:
    I am Ian. I am also Angie. It’s very confusing. Maybe I’m Brad?

    Reply
  323. chris said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:02 am

    @N’other Name:
    in diana’s case, ok she was young but anyway, thinking that in the royalty, you make a marriage of love is stupid. they make marriage of convenience. love has nothing to do with it. it’s about the public’s opinion, the offsprings and politics. who cares if he’s gay ? he has to assume his charge before.

    Reply
  324. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:04 am

    @Astro:
    That interview in the Daily Mirror has been niggling at me since I read it.
    First, because it was so completely different from the answers that he avoided in the live interview with Ann Curry earlier on that day. Why gush on in print when you could have done the same on national TV and where people could watch the online video over and over again?
    Second, and this is really what’s “out of place”, is the “my daughter from Africa” comment. It’s a really weird thing to say when you have 6 children, 2 of whom are girls born in Africa.

    I’m now wondering if this wasn’t an AJ plant that contains a veiled threat to Brad. Perhaps the fight about “not promoting her as she wanted to be” had to do with wanting him to talk up how wonderful she is, what a great mother etc, as we have seen them doing in the past. He stuck to his guns in the Curry interview. Then, we see the Mirror article in which he is saying how lucky he is, how in love they are blah blah (all the things he DIDN’T say in the Curry interview), and then that bit about my African daughter. I know we’ve speculated here that one of the biological kids is not his. Personally, if that is the case, I’d be a lot more inclined to believe that it would be Shiloh than one of the twins. And maybe she is the “African daughter” referred to, and that was in some way a warning to Brad?

    Just throwing out ideas here because that comment was very very odd.

    Reply
  325. Lizzieb said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:15 am

    @Canuck:
    Ha ha! “The 33-year-old, who was speaking at a glamourous party in Cannes, gushed about his kids: “My daughter from Africa is beautiful – we’re so lucky to have her and to have children from around the world.” What the fuck? Only Zahara is beautiful? Or is he such an affected twat that he thinks Shiloh is ‘African’ because they closed down a third world country to have the most pretentious birth in history? What is wrong with this man? Is he mentally disabled? Or just thick? Oh boy Bradders, you must feel a tool.You thought shacking up with La Jolie would give you status as an ‘artist’ and ‘humanitarian’ and instead you look like a fool who can’t keep his yap shut for 30 seconds. You da fool Bradders. Face facts, man up and grow your balls back. Get those kids away from the nut job and never, ever think of yourself as anything other than an aging himbo. That way, you may not be the world’s biggest joke. MAYBE.

    Reply
  326. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:23 am

    @Lizzieb:
    That’s just it, I don’t think Brad ever actually said this. I think that this came from AJ’s people.

    Reply
  327. LurkeyLoo said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:34 am

    Why are you so vicious towards people? I do not get it at all. @keane:

    Reply
  328. luka said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:36 am

    Is anybody seeing our messages about not being able to see past 51 comments? Really frustrating. Has been like that for nearly 8 hours for me here.

    Reply
  329. Margarita said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:38 am

    @Canuck:
    I think he said it, and I think he was drunk and caught up in the moment. He is in love with someone and it is not AJ. Imagine being in love with someone, but you can’t talk about them, can’t show the world how happy you are, because you’re part of the all-powerful BRAND, tied together with 6 kids and a ton of contract commitments?

    He stuck to his guns with Ann Curry – he was being honest (because it was 1 in the afternoon and he was sober). He got drunk at the afterparty and got caught up in the moment. He spoke about being in love with someone else…and Z is actually his daughter…altho they adopted her together she is actually Brad’s daughter and she is going with him and his ‘love’. I think the minute it rolls off his tonge he realizes what he says and then tries to back track.

    After all, he has a movie to promote.

    Reply
  330. kira said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:48 am

    Are you playing games Ian? Or could it be that you have a slight computer problem with the posts on this thread?

    Reply
  331. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:57 am

    @LurkeyLoo:

    What the fuck?

    Reply
  332. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:59 am

    @Margarita:

    Quoted from the interview (and it sounds like it’s written by a Harlequin romance author to me):

    The Hollywood hunk led us by the hand into the VVVIP area of his premiere after-party in Cannes and opened his heart about 33-year-old Angelina. He even admitted that, far from splitting up, they plan to extend their brood.

    Brad, 45, told us: “I am in love and I have the most beautiful family – what else can a guy want? I am the happiest man ever.

    “My daughter from Africa is beautiful. We’re so lucky to have her and to have children from around the world.

    “They’re all fantastic and we would love another. Who knows, maybe we’ll have one in London, I’d like that.”

    Swoon! Well, it’s not every day that you have Brad Pitt whispering sweet nothings into your ear – even if they are about his girlfriend.
    ***********************************************
    I don’t buy this one bit. I don’t believe for a minute that he would “lead the interviewer by the hand”, nor interrupt an interview in the middle to start “snogging AJ” right in front of this person, only to resume the interview when he finally comes up for air. He didn’t even do that at the beginning, it’s not likely he’s going to start 4 years later. I call BULLSHIT on this one, never happened.

    Reply
  333. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:01 am

    @luka:
    I’m not having this problem here in the UK, the comments are updating properly for me.

    Reply
  334. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:05 am

    @Lizzieb:

    I’m not sure but it is now VERIFIED that I am in fact Ian, which is the best news ever! Can’t wait to find out how this has been proved and where. I love these people. You just realise how impossible it would be for these people to ever understand the difference between truth and lies when someone says something like that. It has been “outed” on another site and now “verified” that I am in fact Ian? There are no words for these people there really aren’t. But then I guess you can’t expect much more from the people who are suckered in by Brangelina’s lies.

    Reply
  335. too curious said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:10 am

    @Keane:

    *struggles to open second eye to ease reading overnight posts* – Keane, I think I am still half asleep (yeah, this site is addicting) but you crack me up!! I loved the I AM IAN post, too! I’m kind of hoping that someone will verify that I’m Jen, because I would love to rich and gorgeous! Or let me think, is there anyone else I’d like to be ‘verified’ as…LOL

    Btw, do we now address you as HHK (Her Highness Keane) or may we stay with the extremely informal Keane??

    Reply
  336. sama said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:11 am

    @Margarita:

    I think you don’t know nothing…. You said about his new love in a previous thread “Guess Who” later on you said nobody knows her…. Stop making things up nobody believes them……..

    Reply
  337. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Where’s everybody?

    Reply
  338. too curious said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    To re-enter the fray about this thread, the issue is not whether or not it is ok to be a working mother (of course it is) it is regarding AJ’s hypocrisy. To say immediately after bringing Pax home that she was going to take an extended period off work to help him adjust to his new life and within days sign on to do another movie and NOT take the time off is being a hypocrite. If she came out and said “I know I claimed I was going to take off time but then X came along and Pax seemed fine” or just “you know, I love my kids but I’m not cut out to be a stay at home Mom” no one would care. But to claim, pretty much every time a child is added to the family, that she intends to take a long break or stop making films to concentrate on being a mother and ONLY saying so to further an image of her as an Earth Mother, is the issue. The need to produce a false image to counteract he true nature is what is so grating to so many people.

    Reply
  339. Z said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:23 am

    @Canuck:
    Yep. I agree…and he completely side-stepped Ann Curry’s question about if it’s the happiest time of his life….even if he was wasted, I don’t believe he would later in the day tell a less reputable interviewer “I am the happiest man ever.”….nope. Didn’t happen. And the comment about my daughter from Africa is also BS….he wouldn’t single out one of the kids. He would have to be stoned/high/drunk/crazy out of his mind…I just don’t buy it.

    Reply
  340. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    @too curious:

    Hm, I’m going to have to think on that, but I definitely think a first step would be to change the name of the site to http://www.keaneisianundercoverIamspartacus.com. What do you think, snappy hey? Yes perhaps I should also adopt a title seeing as I am so posh and all, oh no I mean as I am actually Ian. Yes how about Her Royal Highness, Defender of the Anti-Brangelina Faith and Queen of the Realm of http://www.keaneisianundercoveriamspartacus.com? Its a little short I know but I like to keep things to a manageable level so everyone can use it every time they address me. I think that just about does me the honour I deserve don’t you? If you can think of any other appellations I can throw in there to further glorify myself then please let me know. I am thinking about something along the lines of Scourge of the Loons, Protector of the Fugly Jen Hen Maniston fans etc. I’ll work on it and get back to you asap, trust.

    Reply
  341. stinky-inky said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    @Constant Gardner:
    Finally! I’ve been all night for someone to get it!

    Reply
  342. stinky-inky said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:33 am

    @stinky-inky:
    Should be waiting all night. Actually I was sleeping all night. But I checked first thing in the morning.

    Reply
  343. luka said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    Yay…finally comments are showing up :) Now I have to catch up…at 1.35am

    Reply
  344. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:40 am

    Good Grief…..why do people who envy others with a much larger functioning brain resort to name calling?@Keane:

    Reply
  345. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:41 am

    @HerImperialMajestyKeaneWhoIsIanUnlessSheFeelsLikeBeingSpartacusToday:
    I rather like the Scourge of the Loons myself

    Reply
  346. Vittorio said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:43 am

    @Keane:
    Your Most Royal Highness,
    I bow down to you……………………………I too am Ian……………..Spartacus!!!!!!!!!
    That title is perfect!

    Reply
  347. sinker said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    @TobyKat:
    Winston Churchill was her idol as a kid? OK that seals the deal: She is completely full……of…. sh*t.
    “Yeah, and then when i was a kid I’d read Winston Churchill, yeah, yeah, that’s it — that’s what i did. I did!” Just like that lying skit guy on SNL. IMO JMO

    Reply
  348. too curious said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:46 am

    @Canuck:

    Yeah, I agree, Scourge of the Loons does have the proper ring to it!!

    Reply
  349. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:47 am

    @Patty Anne:

    I honestly don’t know where she is coming from there. After all the abuse I’ve received on this blog in the past few days and I am being accused of being vicious? Honestly I give up!

    Reply
  350. too curious said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:49 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Morning AFM<

    I’m here! Although I will have to get off soon :(

    It looks like overnight some people weren’t seeing all of the posts…hope it isn’t happening to you.

    Reply
  351. Liin said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    HHEELLLOOOOOOOOO, echo echo echo echo… spooky where is everyone?

    Cant wait for more gossip Ian, I ate your peanut now I just want the whole bag! xxxxxx

    Reply
  352. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    @Keane:
    I think that you many have jumped on the wrong Lizzie, this one didn’t seem like a loon from her later posts, and was probably not the other Liz E. That may have been what LurkeyLoo meant.

    Reply
  353. Caribsmom said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    @Keane:Dont worry about it! I was on the live broadcast, I saw you posting and I saw Ian reading, I can say quite emphatically that you are NOT Ian. LOL Just laugh it off when considering the source. They really want to get you riled up because then they think they’ve accomplished something for the day.

    Reply
  354. LurkeyLoo said on May 26th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    To whom do you refer? @Patty Anne:

    Reply
  355. sinker said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:00 am

    @Knowone:
    i am a big Vajragini fan!

    The NYT did the story on AJ being the master media manipulator and IMO trevor nielson is the one telling her what to do. so i can believe that People is part of her PR firm. IMO.

    Reply
  356. Liin said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    @Liin:

    Sorry guys, really strange my computer was not refreshing anyones comments, it said 351 comments but only showed 51, so I posted a comment and there you all are, I thought I had lost you all.

    Reply
  357. LurkeyLoo said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    Thank you, Canuck. I simply asked a question to Keane. Keane, didn’t answer. Yet, Patty Anne has to make a degrading comment (seemingly directed at me) about my envy of higher brain functioning. Right.
    @Canuck:

    Reply
  358. LurkeyLoo said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    Why not answer the question instead of ganging up for an attack on me?
    @Keane:

    Reply
  359. mooki said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:10 am

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8067590.stm

    the Co$ is on trial in France. beginning of the end…

    Reply
  360. too curious said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:10 am

    @Caribsmom:

    Caribsmom,

    What do you mean, Keane isn’t Ian??? Now I am soooooooooooo confused? This is a trick, right? Just to get me to keep posting so Kenae/Ian can make gazillions of dollars of this site? Or wait, is Keane Kate? And Kate is Ian? Or is Keane Spartacus? Or is Ian Spartacus? Or…

    ROTFLMAO!

    And with that note I must go for now. Talk to y’all later!

    Reply
  361. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:10 am

    Never give up, that is surrendering, and we know IAN would never surrender….wink! wink! As for the insults, it’s all they have. I have decided not to post any reply to any moronic-LOON comments. I refuse to validate their insane rhetoric…. They aren’t here to defend their false idol, but rather to disrupt IAN’s blog on the Goth Queen. Remember as Kate suggested….. sssssssssssssssssttt!…lmbo@Keane:

    Reply
  362. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:13 am

    Wow! I never thought i’d see Scientology go to trial for any of their well closeted functions. Happy to see France taking them on for fraud. As i see it, they only want wealthy persons so they can bleed them dry, and what is going on with a persons intelligence to believe we are aliens from space in “human suits”?@mooki:

    Reply
  363. TobyKay said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    Test

    Reply
  364. LurkeyLoo said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    Okay, I am NOT a loon. You do not have to attack me because I asked a simple question…one that was NOT directed at you. I’ve not called ANYONE names….you are the one name calling and I have done nothing to warrant being called a moron. It seems as though you should take a good long look in the mirror….after you go FUCK YOURSELF, of course! @Patty Anne:

    Reply
  365. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    How true! Disruption of the blog by snide or outright attacks. They know they can rile Keane, so they go for her. I once read that a person who can not create a forceable arguement tends to resort to name calling and infighting. We’ve been through it for days now, and i for one refuse to be made to feel other than how I choose to feel , ergo, i will not reply to any LOONatics or blog disruppters….they can play in the sandbox alone.@Caribsmom:

    Reply
  366. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:17 am

    @too curious:
    Yeah I was getting the 51 comment problem also. Last night I stopped in and only 51 comments to read. This morning the same thing… I’m like WTF? Where did everybody go?

    Good Morning everybody!! Hope you all had a nice weekend.

    Reply
  367. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    I need to purchase IAN’s book on Scientology. John Travolta lives nearby, and in fact was about to purchase land on our lake to build an outreach for his church. He seems to be a very mannerly, gentle man. Soft spoken, respectful, and intelligent. I wonder how he can believe he is an alien from outter space? See? I need the book to understand his thinking on this. BTW, so very sorry he lost his much loved son, Jett.

    Reply
  368. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:22 am

    Morning Angie’s Fax Machine….had a terrific holiday weekend here. Did a major cook out on the back deck, and had a lovely day with the grands. Hope you had an equally great weekend@Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Reply
  369. Liin said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:22 am

    Major gremlins in the works – will try again tomorrow – keep going the IUC faithful!

    Reply
  370. Constant Gardner said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:24 am

    @stinky-inky:
    ye ought not a dun that to your boy, hmmm, hmmmm I’m your boy, hmmm, hmmmm. Better send a hearst.

    Reply
  371. Liin said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:27 am

    @mooki:

    YESSSSSSS!!! about time too.

    Reply
  372. azzy said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:32 am

    no surprise.

    Reply
  373. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:40 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Good to hear you had a terrific weekend. Mine was pretty good, but yesterday sucked ass. Everything just kept going wrong. I wonder if Mercury was in retrograde for me LOL?

    Reply
  374. stinky-inky said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:42 am

    @Constant Gardner:
    What are thinking about Carl?
    I’m thinking about gettin me some more of then french-fried potaters.

    I know BBT is not too well-liked on this site, but that movie is one of my all time favorites. It was just brilliant. BBT was amazing–so was the entire cast. And John Ritter and Dwight Yoakum were incredible.

    Reply
  375. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:43 am

    Lol….i can understand that. Try being a Taurus married to a Leo@Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Reply
  376. Test said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    test

    Reply
  377. Constant Gardner said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:50 am

    @stinky-inky:
    Name of Carl. Got me some hard candy and a fixin’ lawnmowers, hmmmm, hmmmm. You and your mama, ye done been nice to me. Some folks call it a Kaiser Blade. I call it a Sling Blade. Some folks call it hell, I call it HAIDES.

    Love that flick, BBT was very good, DY was awesome, glad to find another fan of cult movies here.

    Reply
  378. TobyKay said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:55 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Patty Anne, I take no sides here and have enjoyed reading and posting on this blog. Most of yesterday and the day befores comments were crap. I don’t enjoy the nonsense going back and forth between the bloggers. Obviously just about everyone on this blog supports ian, i do. However, i don’t think LurkeyLoo did anything wrong. She Did not attack anyone, she asked Keane a question. I don’t think people should be called names and attacked for asking a question. Just because someone may not agree 100% doesn’t mean they are a loon. I IGNORE those obvious people. However, let’s be careful not to alienate people please. This is for the most part a friendly blog. i really don’t want anyother day of nasty and mean spirited comments. Again, love this blog, don’t love personal attacks on anyone.

    Reply
  379. Caribsmom said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    @stinky-inky:Okay, what movie is that?? We just watched a wierd one with BBT called Chrystal. Did anyone else see it? It was filmed in Arkansas and all about these Arkansas hillbillies, and my hubby and I laughed cos we live here now but we’re from Florida and definitely NOT hillbillies, LOL But I said there must still be people like that up in them thar hills! LOL Thing about the movie though, it sure stuck with me and I thought about it for days after.

    Reply
  380. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:06 am

    TobyKay, look back over my posts and notice to whom i posted. You will not find one post directed to LurkeyLoo, i am entitled to state my opinion on subjects the same as anyone. If that person CHOSE to take it personally, is something to ask themselvs about. However, LurkeyLoo did direct a FUCK YOU at Patty anne. What? Nothing to say about that? I too believe this to be a friendly blog. People have formed friendships on the internet, as i have. I do believe in standing up for myself though:”LurkeyLoo said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:16 am .
    Okay, I am NOT a loon. You do not have to attack me because I asked a simple question…one that was NOT directed at you. I’ve not called ANYONE names….you are the one name calling and I have done nothing to warrant being called a moron. It seems as though you should take a good long look in the mirror….after you go FUCK YOURSELF, of course! @Patty Anne”
    @TobyKay:

    Reply
  381. sinker said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:06 am

    @Keane:

    : ) needed that laugh! yes, a proper star indeed. it amazes me that anyone would dare hold up a couple of probable fake relationships against the nonstop barrage of PR b.s. and 5 to 6 years of real scams (which includes all of her births and adoptions).

    Reply
  382. jan said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    yes you can be a mother as well as work, but if you want to have a large family is different cultures you need to spent time with them to adapt and get comfortable with the new family and not dragged all over the world. it is pure shit that you want the kids to be world travellers what the hell does a kid that age know of travelling and the history of a new place every 2 or 3 months. she chose to adopt and bring bio’s into their lives at a alarming fast pace she should sit her bony behind down and be a mother. i worked to support my two boys and if i had the money i would have stayed at home until they where at least 10 years old and been a mother. there is plenty of time for her to be and actress even though she looks haggard and old at 33 years of age she would not miss a couple of years and then started to work again. if she is not the saty at home type she should have stopped at two and waited till she retired before trying to save all the poor kids in the world. the adopted would have been better off at home in their own country with family she could have supported and helped them they would have had a stable and sane life of school and friends not the crazy life they have now. her and peewee are the most moronic pair i have the misfortune to come across in my life and they disgust me to no end with their fake pr and oh watch me save the world ways. yes no’othername i do tend to run on with my sentences when i am on a rant and i am a true gemini in that way everything is to slow and i cannot afford to stop at points same as in my handwritting you really don’t want to see that and my mind is to fast for my mouth and fingers. i feel god invented computors so that people did not have to decipher my handwritten letters. i posted at about 12noon and it is now 17:15 here in sa.

    Reply
  383. Caribsmom said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    @Patty Anne:Yea I didn’t enjoy the FU comment at all! Big Sigh. Anyway, I’ve got to get some work done so have a great day everyone!! xoxoxo Tamara

    Reply
  384. stinky-inky said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    @Caribsmom:
    Constant Gardener and I are referring to Sling Blade, the movie that started BBT’s career in 1996. It was written and directed by BBT, who also starred in it. If you like small-town Southern characters, this is your movie. It’s rather somber, although there are moments of hilarity.

    Reply
  385. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:20 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine: Hi there. Mercury IS in Retro until the 30th. Really hit big-time here. Ex’s computer broke, my mouse broke, washing machine broke, communication glitches w/ the ex for days worse than usual…then witnessing all the communication problems on this site, then last night’s tech problems.

    I sent a quickie note to you on another thread to tell you about an artist (music) I think you’d like. Did you get it?

    Reply
  386. as said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    asddfgghj

    Reply
  387. TobyKat said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    zzzz

    Reply
  388. TobyKat said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Yes she did choose to write FU. i did not condone that. Since you, keane, kate and many others are staples on this blog i was asking that we don’t lower ourselves to catty comments that seem to take over the board at times. i do want to maintain the intergrity of this board. i was just asking for some help in doing that.

    Reply
  389. Vittorio said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:38 am

    @TobyKat:
    In defense of my posting pals here……come on! They just kept up and kept up with it. how much are these lovely people supposed to endure. It reminds me of when my daughter says I yelled her and I said yeah well I said it pretty nicely the first 10 times! Jeez, enough with the nuts. If they hate it, just go. It is so, so simple.

    Reply
  390. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:43 am

    That is the very reason i do not respond to direct attacks. I too want peace and friendship on this blog, however, when attacked in such a vile manner, i will NOT F.U. myself, but will explain my reasoning in a calm manner. Replying to a direct assult only continues the battle, as you are right now, and as i am in order to explain this once more. Caesar Milan’ is nationally known as The Dog Whisper…Caesar teaches to ignore verbal conflaragation and to use the ssssssssssssssssssstttt! command to stop it without out right war. You will notice i have posted that several times rather than to retaliate. Normally i would ignore this, however you seem to think this is a way to bring peace to the blog. @TobyKat:

    Reply
  391. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:44 am

    I’m comment #52 again!! LOL

    Reply
  392. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    Just had a humorous thought….PAX means Peace [Medieval Latin px, from Latin, peace;
    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pax

    Reply
  393. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Do you feel as if you’re on a merry-go-round yet?….lol@Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Reply
  394. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Can I ask a question here?
    Who were you referring to in the post that LurkeyLoo took to mean herself?

    Reply
  395. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    @SZ:
    Yes yes! I did read your comment to me. Thanks a lot. I stopped by yesterday very quickly to see what was up, but didn’t get a chance to comment. Since the weather has gotten so beautiful I haven’t been spending as much time here. Been out and about. I haven’t gotten a chance to look into Mamer yet.

    I knew it!! That damn Mercury Retro. I read up on it and I found out that it’s also not a good time to make big purchases. Well, this weekend my hubby and I planned a picnic and invited one of his friends with his family. We spent over $150 on food etc for just this picnic (a lot for us. we’re broke). Of course at the last minute they decided they couldn’t go but that we were welcome to stop by their house after the picnic. My husband and I get to the picnic site and it was disgusting. A state park mind you. The grass had not been cut, mud everywhere, and no place for our daughter to play. I was furious. We ended up going to his friends house instead. Two hours later my daughter decided to have a meltdown (she’s 2.5 years old). We had to run out of there and we didn’t even get to taste any of the food we had spent so much money on. On top of that my husband and I argued over leaving his friend’s house. It was just a horrible horrible day.

    Reply
  396. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 10:59 am

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar … roats.html
    “In reality, the actress actually spent less than 36 hours in Cannes and very little time with her lover. Onlookers also reportedly said that once the cameras stopped flicking at the premiere, Angelina’s smile disappeared and she furiously ran up the stairs of the theatre leaving a flustered Brad to run after her.”
    Wow!, after the cameras stopped she quit smiling and ran furiously up the stairs leaving Brad to run after her…lmboooo. Now why wasn’t THAT on video??

    Reply
  397. LurkeyLoo said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Wow. All of this because I asked a question. Geez. First of all, sorry for the F. U. comment. It isn’t like Keane or other frequent posters have ever dropped an F bomb on this blog. However, it came ONLY after my intellect was insulted for no reason (Patty Anne). You know full well that you directed the comments towards me…don’t play the innocent victim now that someone stood up for me (thank you, by the way, TobyKat). My question was to Keane and I am sure (although, not so much now) that Keane is adult enough to answer herself…Patty Anne, you were never part of the equation. It was a direct question, not an insult. I enjoy this site and everything that Ian brings to the table. I asked the question because it seems that everyone is so nasty to one another at times and I don’t understand why. This is a blog and it is in regards to some shallow HW “power” couple who are, in my opinion, utter bullshit (which would make me not a loon…right?)….what could any one of us have invested in these two people that we would lower ourselves to being nasty to one another due to opposing views/comments? That said, I am done posting on this site as I am not going to be attacked by someone that has no idea of anything about me…my education level included.

    Reply
  398. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Generalization of my philosophy of dealing with room fighting@Canuck:

    Reply
  399. meg said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    @Lizzieb:
    1. you are JEALOUS!
    2. it is typically a sentence taken out of its context and this can take a sens different to what someone really said

    Reply
  400. ceegee said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    AFM, I can’t believe they didn’t send any of the food home with you. How tacky. JMO

    Reply
  401. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    In thinking over your question, i can honestly say i have no idea which of my posts LurkyLoo chose to take as intended for her personally. As we all know, this blog has been attacked viciously for days now, and we’ve all had to endure the name calling, disruption of a very nice, friendly blog site. My comments were generalizations of how i feel about such rediculous attacks meant only to get the chat off track so we are no longer discussing IAN’s topic. However, since posting my philosophies on non responsive actions for my part….for the past three days mind you, same comments from me about the same subject…i now find myself under attack and accused of acting innocent of direct insults to someone who meant no harm to anyone…Oh yea? Then why perpetuating this farce? You’re sorry i was told F U Patty anne, i explained my philosophy of peace in the blog, and as far as i am concerned, i am back to my non replying of any person honestly or mistakenly starting disruption in the room. To me, it is over. So Be IT@Canuck:

    Reply
  402. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:11 am

    @meg:
    That’s supposed to be spelt “jellus” in Loon-speak, isn’t it? LOL

    You’ll find the whole interview from the Mirror copied further up, click on my name here in red @Canuck:

    Reply
  403. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:13 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine: Oy! What a depressing experience all the way around. And you have a child in “the terrible 2’s”? Hang in there!

    Reply
  404. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    @ceegee:
    We left out of there so quickly and by then I was so frustrated I didn’t want to bother packing anything.

    Anyway, so what’s going on? Angie being a neglectful mother? Someone above mentioned about kids loving their nannies and then finding out it’s the nannies’ job to “love them”. You gotta watch that movie with Scar Jo “The Nanny Diaries”. I thought it was just gonna be some cheesy crapfest, but it wasn’t too bad. Kinda sad, actually.

    Reply
  405. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Chill, I was only asking a question, not attacking you.

    To be honest though, I too took that remark to mean LurkeyLoo, since your post was made to Keane who was responding to a post from Lurkey.

    Tell you what I think went on:
    Liz E made a bunch of comments earlier on about Keane being Ian.
    New poster by the name of Lizzieb came on later, not a loon, posts for the first time (I think)
    Next post after hers is one from Keane responding to Liz E, but that because it’s right after Lizzieb, seems to be directed at her, all the more so because there is mention to posting under different names
    LurkeyLoo asked why Keane was being mean (as she read it as meaning Lizzieb, who hadn’t even addressed Keane)
    Keane said “What the fuck”
    You responded to that
    LurkeyLoo took offense to your post
    Both of you get pissed off over a misunderstanding

    Now, can we please all play nice?

    Reply
  406. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @PFAB:

    @ Lurkey Loo and Canuck – this is the post I was referring to, the exact same one that was posted by a certain Liz E. a way up thread. Liz E. has been commenting on this blog on and off from very near the beginning. I’ve always thought her to be a plant, not a real poster. Who did you think I was referring to?

    Reply
  407. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    1) no need for me to chill as i am not hot.
    2) When one of us posts a comment, it may not show up directly beneath the one it is in response to, it is up to the name in red at the bottom to read it knowing it is in response to them
    3) thank you for your sincere efforts to make peace here, but as i will no longer be justifying my philosophies of peaceful dialog, won’t be necessary. I am the most peaceful person i know..lol
    4) Shame this wasn’t done when all the Loons were in the room yesterday attacking everyone isn’t it?
    Over, done with. @Canuck:

    Reply
  408. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @Keane:
    The Lizzieb whose post was right before your Spartacus one. Bad timing and alignment of posts, I think.

    Reply
  409. ceegee said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:33 am

    Who feeds stories to Hello – AJ or BP? Love this quote – In short, living the kind of “white picket fence, middle-America lifestyle” that he’s comfortable with. “It’s how I was raised in Springfield, Missouri,” explains Brad.

    http://www.hellomagazine.ca/film/200905261280/brad/angelina/hello/1/

    Reply
  410. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    @Canuck: Good clarification. Your comment that a “misunderstanding” occurred is precisely what happens (more than usual) when Mercury is in Retro. Communications become snarled, technical issues that have an already weak point tend to fall apart… I didn’t pay attention to this for many years, and then I began noticing in my own life and the lives of others, that these things often are worse during Mercury in… Mercury, as you may know, rules communication.

    Reply
  411. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    @Patty Anne:
    Cool

    Reply
  412. g said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    test cause problems viewing comments

    Reply
  413. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    BTW Lizzieb and I are old friends from Dlisted days so I would not be attacking her under any circumstances, she’s a cool chick. I didn’t use the reply button because I was on my Blackberry and it takes too long to scroll down. What the hell is the deal with all this fracas? It is becoming insane. LurkeyLoo if you chcek back over the threads over the past few days you will see I have been set upon in extremely vicious terms, including homophobic terms by several new posters. I have experienced this every day for the past 3 or 4 months I’ve been posting on this site. How would that make you feel? I am allowed to stand up for myself, I am not Gandhi I’m afraid. Sometimes the only way to rid the blog of a troll is to give them worse than they’re giving me, that’s why I retaliate. Otherwise they just keep coming back with their comments about me and I should not have to take that. That is bullying and it is completely unnecessary. A case in point is the twat UFB who has come here periodically simply to attack me over the last few months. He never says a word about the posts, about himself or anybody else. That is cyber bullying and I ignored him or tried to respond civilly for long enough. But that didn’t work so now I tell him and others like him to fuck off in no uncertain terms because I am not here to be abused day after day after day. I’m sure if you were in my position you would do the same. And I really am sick to death of defending myself and explaining myself on this blog.

    Reply
  414. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    @SZ:
    All of West Africa must be permanently under a Mercury in Retro then, the phones NEVER work :D

    Reply
  415. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:46 am

    That was such a bunch of dribble….how can he , with a straight face yet, compare living in a mansion in Long Island NY with living in Nixa, Missouri, a tiny town about 80 miles south of Springfield? Sometimes i wonder if Brad is trying to convince himself more than convince us@ceegee:

    Reply
  416. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:46 am

    @Keane:
    The joys of the internet, what seems obvious to ourselves isn’t always obvious to the others. Just to confound us a bit more, she responded to that post here @Lizzieb: in a way that wasn’t clear if she got you or was confused about what you were saying. (or so I read it)

    Anyways, as I said it was an unfortunate alignment of posts that is apparently the fault of that damned Retro Mercury (who in my mind looks just like the Interflora guy, thanks SZ). Obviously no one else would have any idea that you are acquainted with Lizzieb from elsewhere unless they also frequent the same internet hangout.

    Reply
  417. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:49 am

    Wonder if this new person Margaria says Brad is so in love with (which is possible) knows about his nasty threesomes with Ang and Bunnie and the15k a week on hookers? Taking Zahara but leaving his bio kids, I highly doubt that. The twins not his or Angs, but IAN 2of the kids are Brads,So.and as Sama said “guess who?” but then again she is a civilian from his past he is going bad to..

    Margrita, this story has been passed around for about 8 months now. Now we all know they have been splitting since the fall but for you to come on here with this and sell it and contradict IAN in more areas than one you will need to put up some names. I have heard this over and over and discounted it because Brad is screwing others and it defies common sense that he would ever walk away and take only Zahara.

    I am aware they both planned her adoption, but he was still married when she was adopted. I
    IAN says he has only adopted one and it would make sense it would be Zahara. Consider the emotional damage to his bio kids later if he did that even if it turned out none of the bios were his, he will never admit that, and his parents love and believe them to be?

    I have a question for you, since you seem to believe this article. He talks about maybe them having more and one in London would be nice, why do you think he said that?

    Reply
  418. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    On Topic: I have no idea what kind of time AJ spends w/ the kids. To me, no one really knows right now unless they live in the house. (Tho’ if nanny’s are talking, we’ll find out soon.) What I DO find distressing about the kids is what I’ve mentioned in other posts. The traveling. No way to have real friends. Every time they go out in public someone is taking pic’s and bulbs are sometimes flashing, people are staring, etc. That kind of constant intrusion would be disturbing to a small child (like Shiloh crying).

    Think of children of military families who, later in life, report/talk about how jarring it had been to move around so much when growing up. “Fitting-in” was difficult. I do think BP loves the kids. I would hope that AJ’s seemingly insensitve remarks about Shiloh come from her often befuddled mind and way w/ words…which is surprising in a Gemini…ruled by Mercury = communication and a fast mind. Even my Gemini friends on drugs can speak w/ more clarity. She stumbles all over her tongue…perhaps that tongue has spent too much time educating a penis.

    Reply
  419. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    @ceegee:
    I believe that’s AJ’s mouthpiece.

    Reply
  420. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    @ceegee:
    LOL he also was not raised shacking up or as the public believes since no one knows they were married. That is one of the biggest frauds to me. If someone could present the marriage and annullment papers and them still pretending to be so in love then people would begin to understand who they are.

    Reply
  421. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    @sinker:I believe that Trevor is the puppet of the this sham, too. To what end? Just so the CFR can have it’s spokeswhore? Is this really what the CFR wants, or do you think at some point, that organization is going to push away from Cruella, too? If the CFR wants this skank, then I have some serious reservations about what it is they are trying to accomplish with their foreign relations agenda. Skank is no role model for anything. JMO

    Reply
  422. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    Meant to say Trevor is the Puppetmaster.

    Reply
  423. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    @Lizzieb:

    I am hoping Lizzieb knew that I was not referring to her. Liz E. and Lizzieb are quite different usernames and she does know me from way back. I hope she didn’t think I was referring to her anyway. Hopefully she will come back to verify. I assumed she was joining in my request for a re-enactment of the scene from Spartacus. Wow could a comment be more misinterpreted?!

    Just for everyone’s future reference, there are people I’m pretty sure are plants as they’ve been posting here on and off for months and always with the same remit of trying to make people not believe the stories, question Ian’s credibility or saying where’s the proof etc. They don’t ever give you a response when you ask why they keep coming back here after all this time when they don’t believe everything to be true. There are other people I know from other sites (nice people) or people who have come here since way back to attack me. I remember all the names and our previous dialogue which is why you might see me jumping down their throat. There is a history to most of what I say to people that obviously is not apparent to most other posters. Just to enlighten people as to why I jump on certain people as soon as they say anything. Its because it is usually far from their first post. Hope that clears that up to a degree.

    Reply
  424. Margarita said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:03 pm

    @Kate:
    He only said that to blow sunshine up the reporter’s ass, since she was a London based reporter, writing for a UK newspaper. That’s why I think he was drunk. He was lost in the moment, and felt like ’spreading the love’ so to speak. He was sincere in his comment, just a bit hammered.

    I never said he’d leave the others…he would never do that because he loves all of them very much. It’s just that Z was always HIS above and beyond everything…he got the ‘calling’ to adopt her, saw her, fell immediately in love (parent style) with her and took the main role in parenting her.

    Reply
  425. Different Guest said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    Just posting to get the rest of the posts. Ian can you do anything about this problem of only getting the 1st 51 messages?

    Reply
  426. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    @Constant Gardner:Chuckling at you two and your BB references. I loved that movie, think he deserved a best actor award in addition to the one he got. Makes me hungry for some french fried tators right now!

    Reply
  427. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    @Canuck: Hhahahaha! Thanks for the laugh! By the way, atsologers also chart countries and cities. California is supposedly a Virgo state and LA a Leo city (I think…haven’t talked/read about his lately…but maybe you should check SA’s atro “ruler.”) Whatever…..remind me to never try to call anyone over there!!!

    Reply
  428. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    @Margarita:
    Why do you believe that Angelina would ever give her up? I don’t see that, and you can not legally arrange pre custody…

    Reply
  429. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    Whoops! I meant “West Africa”.

    Reply
  430. sama said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    @Kate:

    @Kate do you believe anything she says, that he is going to live in France etc. etc. etc. that he is going back to his new love “guess who” but nobody knows her, i don’t believe anything she says…..when you ask why did you say “guess who” but then you say nobody knows her? she doesn’t give a answer…..

    I call total bullshit………

    Reply
  431. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    @SZ:
    West Africa, I think the phones work well in South Africa. During the rainy season with copper phone wires and rotten insulation, it was a nightmare! And try downloading things, ugh

    Reply
  432. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Hi all, just checking to see if this posts.

    Reply
  433. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @ceegee:Yeah, his life right now is so very similar to that life in Missouri. No differences what-so-ever. Keep deluding yourself, Brad.

    Reply
  434. TobyKat said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Again Patty Ann like some others that posted their opinions some of us were confused with were some of the hostility was coming from. i think Canuck said it the best that i think there was confusion on what post that people were actually commenting on. I do and will give my opinion on this post. i am assuming that is what this blog is for. I do not attack anyone and i don’t condone anyone attacking others.
    I only very simply asked not only you but all of us “friends” on this board not to have a replay of yesterday in which it was Keane who got viciously attacked. I stuck up for people yesterday using facts. i commented to Astro and to UFB. Both never responded to my comments which i expected…..
    This to is my last reply on this. i never meant to start a pissing contest between us. Peace, I’m off to spend some time with my family. i’ll check in later. i hope Part 2 to ian’s story will be juicy!

    Reply
  435. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    Anyone notice that they had to Photoshop the cover of the latest Hello! magazine to make Brangie look like they have their heads close together? Look at Brad’s nose and lips… http://www.hellomagazine.com/film/gallery/200905261280/brad/angelina/hello/1/1/

    Reply
  436. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @Margarita:
    Just a note , there is someone else that is close to this , that says Brad favors Knox, and that once he was born that was it for him, he got his son, he wanted outm, and was taking his son with him. Now this person also claims to be “right by his side” on a daily basis.

    To give you a fair shake, why did you say, “he was going back to”, as in someone he was with before, then say “guess who” but then later say it was a civilian, somone we would not know, do you see the contradictions and why the red flags are waving around? Can you explain this a bit?

    Reply
  437. bobbalu said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    ??

    Reply
  438. Carrie said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    Can’t read comments past 5/25 at 2:29 p.m.

    Reply
  439. Different Guest said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    This is so mild, why is the Loon Platoon out in force? Has the Brange finally realized that the public is no longer buying what they are selling?

    Reply
  440. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    @sama:
    I have heard this story so many times before, and discounted it , for many reasons. Jolie is taking the kids to France so I highly doubt he is going to live there lol, but the blog has gottne nasty so in the spirit of fairness let’s give her a chance to explain what she meant exactly, because then I can compare it to what I was told by someone else. They can not all be right, can they? lol I tend to ignore all of this stuff as random gossip unless names ae put with it. Details, otherwise. sorry. But if she wants to explain, let’s hear it, IAN will know where it falls.

    Reply
  441. bobbalu said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    Ok, now that I know I’m able to post. I’ve been reading this website for a month, month and a half and I find it fairly entertaining. But after this past week I just had to comment.
    Keane this is directly for you, you come across as a insecure, miserable, narcistic, and pathetic person. Constantly crying how everyone picks on you and you do nothing wrong. All that I have read you make sure all your intellect has been put on each and everty thread, your clothes size, and your all worldly knowledge. Are you trying to prove something to these readers or to yourself? You sound more like an individual crying for attention than an intelligent person contributing information. You take more away from this gossip blog than ‘Ange’s plants” (your words not mine).

    Reply
  442. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    No problem on my part. I completely understand how confusion entered into the equasion. I did my best to clear it up but seems i failed miserably. Yes, i was upset at being told to F U Patty anne by LurkyLoo, but i see now that she was so tenatious in her attack on me because she genuinely believed i was attacking her personally, and that i was not simply giving my philosophy on how i deal with the Loon attacks of the past couple of days. Heaven knows we have enough rabel rousers come here to cause such upset that i suppose we all need to reconsider before we choose to take slight at what was posted. I’d much rather show trouble makers that this is a blog of supportive friendly intelligent people who find no need to attack one another. Thank you for making it clear that you too only want peace on this board as well. And i still stand by Kate’s suggestion a la Caesar Milan that we simply post “sssssssssssssstt” to settle things down….lol @TobyKat:

    Reply
  443. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @bobbalu:
    That might have been better kept to yourself. Can we stick to the subject of the thread, because these personal attacks are getting a bit tedious.

    Reply
  444. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I had problems last night getting on , it was only showing 51 posts, weird.
    Anyway I was watching “Cat People” last night with Natasha Kinski and Malcolm M, and it struck me, off topic for a minute.
    I realized how much AJ resembles Natasha when she was younger, and how she has copied NK’s style , hair , lips, poses, and even stranger,that NK had ties to Roman Polaski.They had an affair when she {NK} was 15 and she later starred in his film “Tess”, that got her critical acclaim as an actress.
    NK is also the daughter of Klaus Kinski.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nastassja_Kinski
    Check out some of these pic’s
    The first is the “infamous” snake photo that NK took that shot her to world wide recognition.
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LCVZWFAEodk/RlsX0zY7KHI/AAAAAAAAEpc/hJH9B5daSTs/s400/kinski+snake+avedon.jpg -Natasha
    http://www.celebforyou.com/d/264-6/angelina-jolie-posing-with-a-snake.jpg – Angelina
    From the movie “Alexander”.
    http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m154/ilSURGiKALli/angelina%20jolie/angelina_jolie_snake.jpg -Angelina
    Head shots of NK
    http://static.zooomr.com/images/6484550_8b49ec04cb.jpg
    http://www.hollywoodcultmovies.com/assets/images/NatashaKinski1.jpg
    http://rentmovie.com/movie-posters/nastassja-kinski-cat-people-3.jpg
    Head shots of AJ
    http://www.celebrity-hair-styles-magazine.com/images/celebrity-very-short-hair-cuts-02.jpg
    http://gossip.elliottback.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/young-angelina-jolie-02.jpg
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_fV8UdiJKQfM/SfBqigGqOXI/AAAAAAAADDk/ny2LwOA7zso/s400/hackers-angelina-jolie2.jpg
    My point is ,and I may be reaching, is that there is NOTHING original about Angelina Jolie, IMO she copied NK’s look , and funny that RP keeps popping up with these woman , the man gets around, especially after raping and sodomizing a 13 year old. NK’s fame was more international and her ” hey day” or peak was in the 70’s-80’s. Anyways JMO, now on to this topic.
    I hope there is more than she is just a “photo-op” mom, I came to that conclusion on my own. Don’t get me wrong Ian , I’m glad to see that this angle of her lack of maternal instincts, and that she just uses the kids for her image is coming out. I can’t wait to read Part II.

    Reply
  445. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    @bobbalu:

    That means so much to me, thanks.

    Reply
  446. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    @Mama San:
    Very good call on the Kinski look.

    Reply
  447. Margarita said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    @Kate:
    I think that’s BS re: Knox. I don’t think the twins are his biologically. Sorry if Ian’s been told differently…and I guess we all don’t have DNA tests either way, but imo the bios are not his. I know she was never pregnant, so I’m not even sure they’re hers, biologically that is. And Brad has a son before Knox, two of them…Mad and Paxie. If someone is telling you differently, you can assume they’re from AJ’s camp. The lengths she’ll go to to protect her secrets and keep the delusion…

    I don’t know who he is going back to, don’t know her background or her name. I just heard she exists. If you were to guess who she is, you would probably be wrong.

    Remember, you only believe the background of this from all the gossip mags (and straight from the horse’s mouths, which in AJ’s case is even less credible). I’m sure there’s much more to this story, things we’ve never been told. And it’s probably much more complicated than anyone on the outside is aware of, as these type of situations usually are. Maybe most of the time they considered themselves to be more ‘co-parents’ than husband and wife. Maybe their main driver was to parent children together, to be an interestingly shaped family, rather than a husband and wife who create (and adopt) offspring.

    just a thought.

    Reply
  448. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    Since we spoke of Mike Tyson a while back, any of you hear that his 4 year old managed to hang herself on a cord for their treadmill, and is in extremely critical condition in the hospital? http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b125707_mike_tysons_daughter_remains_in.html Poor little girl :(

    Reply
  449. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    @Canuck:
    Thxs hon. As soon as I saw the movie it hit me. No offense to NK, I like her as an actress and she is a very beautiful woman. I think AJ is a “white trash” version of her{NK}.
    As always JMO, just wanted to add something to the pot to stir.
    How is everyone?

    Reply
  450. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    @bobbalu:

    Oh and BTW you are 100% correct I am a “insecure, miserable, narcistic, and pathetic person”, absolutely correct. I’m not sure what a “narcistic” person is but as you are obviously of so much greater intelligence than I you will obviously know. Now you’ve summed me up so acutely I’m sure you will have no further need to make a comment on me will you? Thanks so much for your contribution bobbalu, you are a star and the feeling is more than mutual. If I were to sum you up I’d say you sound more than a little bit threatened by me. I guess that would make you as “insecure, miserable, NARCISSISTIC, and pathetic A person” is what you meant to say as I. Cheers for the love its returned with buckets x

    Reply
  451. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    amen@Canuck:

    Reply
  452. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    @Mama San:Hey Mama. What a genius and astute observation. I remember when Natasha Kinski did that snake photo….scandalous at the time (very mild by today’s standards and yes, I long for the good ‘ole days before selling a sex tape became a viable career strategy). Wow, you’re right. Our Skank has been emulating Nastasha, and daring to take it into motherhood territory. Yes, World, it is acceptable to be a whore and a humanitarian. Follow me, young ladies, and everything you ever dreamed can be yours. What ever happened to Natasha Kinski anyway? I never watched that Roman Polanski documentary you told us about, but I want to. Talk about the justice system delivering no justice. Sickening.

    Reply
  453. sama said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @Margarita:

    I don’t know who he is going back to, don’t know her background or her name. I just heard she exists. If you were to guess who she is, you would probably be wrong.

    This is the 3 story she has told that is different about his new love….boring….. bullshit…….

    Reply
  454. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    I”m wondering if the twins even share the same bio Dad? Mom? And, why is Shiloah made to feel “less than” the others? Read an interview in which Angie said her white / blond hair made her different from the others , therefore she stood out…what the heck does that mean? If Shiloah helped Angie trap Brad, why would she NOT cherrish the little one for that reason alone? Very difficult trying to understand a psychotic person, yes, i mean Angie

    Reply
  455. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    @Canuck:
    Very sad indeed, this guy can’t catch a break.
    http://www.TMZ.com, she is now on life support.

    Reply
  456. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    @Mama San:
    I loved Cat People. I wish Natasha Kinsky had kept doing films (or did she and I just never saw them?)

    Reply
  457. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Why the hell would any mother care what the hair colour of her child is? How shallow is that, sorry.

    Reply
  458. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Margarita:“an interestingly shaped family” That’s what I think they’re whole purpose together has been. To actually promote anything goes in America. Any sexual orientation, any lack of morals or values, just get together, steal babies from countries or private citizens, have as much sex in any capacity you choose. Freedom is what they’re selling, with no “values” attached. I just hope and pray that this insane notion of theirs is not condoned, or God forbid, actually being subtly pushed by CFR. I hope they’re as clueless as the public about what these two losers are all about. I want the truth spread out in 64 point headline on every newspaper in the country.

    Reply
  459. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    @Canuck:I saw that. Heartbreaking.

    Reply
  460. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    @Knowone:
    Thank you hon, I try to bring something relevant to the dinner table, lol. I remember it well too, I was a teenager at the time, but I always thought that is was a beautiful photo, and how almost etheral NK looked. I believe she has a daughter with Quincy Jones, and as of now, I haven’t heard much on her. I’m looking up her latest bio, now…. I found this on “myspace”, she is just gorgeous.
    http://www.myspace.com/nastassjakinski
    Oh AJ can’t even compare to NK, it’s like comparing brie to limburger.

    Reply
  461. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Seems that AJ is too preoccupied with the kids’ physical appearance. She’s always going on about having a multi-cultural home, having book-ends for the kids’ ethnicity, etc. But she seems to forget that there are more important things than that. JMO.

    Reply
  462. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Mama San:Or Brie to Velvetta…but I think the best grilled cheese sammich is Velvetta and white bread (I loves me some white trash Velvetta, processed cheese food. LOL

    Reply
  463. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    Velveeta, sorry Kraft for the misspelling. ; )

    Reply
  464. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    @Canuck:
    Her dad Klaus had his fair share of fame in the movies too, quite an impressive body of work.
    He did “Nosferatu”, a more noted film with Isabelle Adjani, based on the novel. I saw and read both, good book , good film. He was kind of the anti-Frank Langella who did “Dracula”, the same year 1979
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079073/
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079641/
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Kinski

    Reply
  465. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Knowone:
    Velvetta, ha ha, that’s too funny, throw on some mater’s on that sandwich, girlfriend and I’ll join ya.

    Reply
  466. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @Mama San:Only if they’re from the garden, love those, not so much the store bought. Yum, that’s getting me thinking about lunch.

    Reply
  467. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    wow, i looked at all the photos you posted and you are dead on. Angie even copied many of Natasha’s poses. She’s even more of a fake than we thought.@Mama San:

    Reply
  468. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    So true, i never felt so sorry for a little child in my life as when i read that, maybe that’s why in the grocery shopping photo ops Shi kept her face covered with her blankee? Mom makes her feel insecure? @Canuck:

    Reply
  469. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @Knowone:
    Oh I’ll tell ya what’s good, is a “Kentucy Hot Brown”, ummmm,ummm,ummm. did I mention ummm.
    Girl you ain’t lived til ya have yourself one of these.
    http://southernfood.about.com/od/kentuckyrecipes/r/bl10424b.htm

    Reply
  470. SZ said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @Canuck: Yes. VERY sad.

    Reply
  471. Knowone said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    @Mama San:My mouth is watering at the words. Sounds divine. Now I’m hungy. Back after lunch….grilled cheese, I’m a terrible cook, and that’s why my friends are all great cooks. I am a very appreciative dinner guest. BBL

    Reply
  472. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    Wow, i visited her myspace page and she’s awesome! Some of her photos were duplicated by Jolie , same pose, etc. This one is a class act….thanks for sharing@Mama San:

    Reply
  473. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Thxs hon. AJ is so uninspired, unoriginal, and just plain tacky, tawdry, and trampy, lol, did I forget anything.
    She really always fell flat with me, over-done, over-acted, over-sexed, over-hyped , everything about her , screams desperate.

    Reply
  474. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    So true. She has no concern for their emotional well being, moral upbringing, emotional lives. i keep thinking back to the comment about looking for a potential adoptee who would blend in….blend in??? What? She has color schemed children? I’d have reconsidered all i know about her , IF she had kept her butt home during those three days at The Hague and Canne and spent time with her children actually being a mother.@Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Reply
  475. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    I always thought of Angie as a drug dealers HO, back alley fighting, drug taking nymphomanic. And that was being kind to her….lol @Mama San:

    Reply
  476. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @Margarita:
    What makes you so convinced that this is true? Let’s entertain that she was never pregnant, we do not know that it was not his sperm, because according to one source there are others on ice, implanted with his sperm just sitting. Now , if you do not know anymore than you are stating, she could have had eggs harvested and used Brads sperm and used a surrogate, yes? It is possible one of the twins is his and one is not, because all you really know is that she was not pregnant? Right?

    Other than that all you really know is taht Brad is in love, but you have no idea with who, well we knew that already, IAN told us that months ago. We knew they split in October, he told us that months ago. We knew he told it was over, that they there was a timeline, that he had papers drawn up by lawyers, we knew that back before Oscar time. We knew he took them to her and it was signed sealed and delivered, in fact on the same day he spent rendezvous with Jen out at teh Cherry Blossum Festival. Miss Nines indicated that she did not carry the twins, so we knew that. None of that is in dispute, and none of it is news. But what is in dispute is that you seem to think none of the bios are his, including Shiloh, is that what you are saying, none of them?

    Would you care to explain how you know? You know all this but yet you do not know who this person he is in love with is? Who by the way, has sat patiently aside while he has had nasty threesomes with AJ and Bunny, paid 15 K a week for hookers, impregnanted a Sudanese model, in around December, and has been sleeping with his male lovers. So in light of all of that, can you explain just a bit more, how you know what you know, and why you believe it to be true over someone else who says they do not leave his side…

    Reply
  477. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    @Knowone:
    Sweetie, you give your friends that recipe and tell them to make it for you.
    I am too, I never turn down a free meal, I don’t care what is it, that’s part of my problem.
    I went to a bar a few years back and they had free “Rocky Mountain Oysters”at “happy hour” in this case I would definately recommend asking the “chef” {insert eye roll} what it is first , if you don’t know,before chowing down. Needless to say I won’t be eating those again.

    Reply
  478. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    If she does, she’s a first class bitch. That child is gorgeous. As are all children, for that matter.
    @Kate:
    It seems to me, as I have had friends do the IVF thing, that the hormones that they put you on make you gain weight. Has AJ ever done that, aside from the times she was pregnant? She’s been skinny as a rail.

    Reply
  479. Canuck said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @Mama San:
    LOLOLOL… oops!

    Reply
  480. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    Lol, back-ally gutter snipe comes to mind.

    Reply
  481. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    @Canuck:
    Ha Ha, I take it ya know what I mean, lol.

    Reply
  482. Mama San said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    For those that don’t know what “Rocky Mountain Oysters” are.
    Rocky Mountains oysters – also known as prairie oysters, Montana tendergroins, cowboy caviar, swinging beef, and calf fires –
    A.K.A. deep fried bull nuts.

    Reply
  483. Margarita said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    @Kate:
    Sorry Ian and Kate, but I think the Sudanese may have taken you for a ride. I don’t buy it, esp the impregnating thing, not one bit. I thoroughly believe that she believes it, but I don’t.

    As for Brad’s love sitting by while there were threesomes and other unappealing behaviors, maybe she wasn’t just sitting by? Maybe it’s taken her quite some time to come to terms with many things, including being in love with someone who isn’t the safest bet. Maybe she’s been doing her own thing, off busy in her own life, and maybe she’s finally ready to admit to defeat because she knows that no one in the world will compare to the love she feels with Brad. Maybe she has been spending this time getting ready for it, weighing her options, knowing that it will be a difficult life…all things considered. Maybe Brad’s been the one waiting for her? Maybe his behaviors will change once he’s with the woman he truly loves?

    That’s my take on it.

    Reply
  484. sama said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    @Margarita:

    I read this as bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla only words no story it is full with if if if if if if if and maybe maybe maybe maybe maybe maybe, you don’t know her but you think think think think think think

    Reply
  485. benjaminbutton14 said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @Astro:
    bb14. I posted the same thing. What a load of bullshit. These 2 loonies will say anything to avoid the truth of splitting. They are telling everyone how happy and in love they are they can’t wait to tell everybody that shit, but when it comes to the truth about splitting they bow out saying its rumours. Do you believe this shit?????

    Reply
  486. benjaminbutton14 said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @sama:
    bb14, I’m with you each story is different

    Reply
  487. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    I question the phrase , ” Going Back To” that indicates he’s been with this woman before, hence the going back to. Perhaps making a list of all his previous women would give a clue?@benjaminbutton14:

    Reply
  488. Patty Anne said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    Juliette Lewis; Robin Gibbens; Gwyenneth Paltrow; Jennifer Aniston; Angelina Jolie; and __________ lol. maybe Brad is hoping for a fivesome?….

    Reply
  489. Margarita said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    @sama:
    I’m heartbroken. Your opinion matters so much to me.

    Reply
  490. benjaminbutton14 said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    bb14. I just read the Hello story. I believe that people keep telling how happy and in love they are, when actually they are convincing themselves that they are. the 2 of them talk bullshit JMO

    Reply
  491. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @Margarita:

    Ok Margarita well as I said before you have to be a close personal friend of these people, a member of staff or an industry insider to know all this info. I asked you before how you knew it all but you chose not to respond then. So I ask you again, what is your connection to these people, how do you know them all and what brings you here? This is not a site for wild conspiracy theories and where anyone can pretend to be an insider. If you’re claiming to have inside info then we need to know how and details about you on which to judge how legit you might be. Otherwise you are really just wasting people’s time. Plus as Sama said, all your posts seem to be taken up with so far are maybes and ifs. If you know you know, if you don’t you’re just guessing based on the same info we all know. Either way, you need to give some evidence as to who you are and why you’re here. As I’ve said before the chances of us getting this type of knowing it all insider posting here are next to none.

    Reply
  492. sama said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    @Margarita:

    You don’t give any answers, you told 3 different stories about this women, you story doesn’t fit
    You don’t have to be heartbroken by my opinion, this is a board and you tell a story that doesn’t meane that i have to believe it and i can tell so and i don’t care if it matters to you or not but i tell my opinion.

    Answer the questions:

    In your story you said “going back to” (but you don’t know her it is only a thing you heard)
    In a other story you said “he is going back to her, quess who” (but yet you say, nobody will know her)

    That are yust a few things that don’t add up……

    And if you know al this why say it on this blog and not sell the story
    And if you know al this why would you say everything if you are that close to brad or angelina

    I think you are making this all up with all the gossip that’s around…

    That is my opinion and you don’t have to be heartbroken by it BYE BYE

    Reply
  493. Kate said on May 26th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    strange,now I am only seeing the 51 comments lol

    Reply
  494. Vittorio said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    @Patty Anne:
    I’m with you, but sometimes Ceasar just has to use the choke chain!

    Reply
  495. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    @Mama San:

    Defo, I think famewhores tend to channel other celebs to hitch a ride on their coat tails to iconoclasm. Madge did it with Cyndi Lauper, Marilyn Monroe and more recently in that showboat of a Scottish castle wedding, Princess Diana. AJ does it with a lot of people I would imagine, we should try to compile a list. Who would like to start?

    Reply
  496. Keane said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Hmmm, no answer again from Margarita as to her identity. I think we can all move along folks, nothing more to be seen here!

    Reply
  497. justhelping said on May 26th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    Oh Mama, Bull nuts. That is funny. I mean, not for you, but you know what I mean.
    I have a question. I need some help. Does anyone know someone that had their tail bone removed? I have to make a decision soon and I don’t personally know of anyone. Kinda scared to mess with m