IUC World Exclusive: Former London Male Prostitute To Out Prince Charles in Explosive New Tell All Book
A former London male prostitute revealed to IUC how he plans to out Britain’s elite world of gay men who pretend to be straight in a tell all book to be released in 2010.
The former prostitute who lives in London’s exclusive Maida Vale area said he intends to out the likes of Prince Charles, David Beckham and Margaret Thatcher’s late husband Sir Denis Thatcher. “These blokes can’t even think straight,” “Colin” said. “I’ve seen them all at down low parties. Charles is notoriously gay. He’s the biggest Queen in Britain. That’s what destroyed his relationship with Diana. He paid her millions to keep quiet about his sexuality. In fact, I will prove that Prince Harry was not fathered by Charles. By the time Di got pregnant with Harry, Charles and Di had not had sex in more than two years. I know that for a fact. Camilla (Parker Bowles) came on the scene for convenience. It’s a perfect case scenario for Charles. Camilla is into women, that’s what destroyed her previous marriage. They are both using their marriage mainly to stay in the closet in order to avoid public scrutiny.” “Colin” said Sir Denis was a client of his for years. “He’d make me tie him up, spank him and give him blow jobs,” “Colin” said. “Then he’d want it up the arse for an hour. He had amazing stamina.” As for Beckham, “Colin” said he’d only reveal that Beckham likes to swing. “He’s definitely into men, but I must save some things for my book,” he said. Developing…
- 103 Comments
- Tags: Camilla Parker Bowles, Prince Charles





I think some other writer tried to prove Harry was not Charles also, forgotten who though, that was a few years back.
Replyim startin to doubt this website.
all those stories abt brad and angie
thn abt angie who probably “wont” head to the cannes
but now thrs photos of them splashed
and of cos some new reason created.
and now this.
Replyprince phillip is the gay one.
and charles and that horse despite everything are rly in love.
@c:
Replyyoure*starting* to doubt this site?
You mean the royal brit is a gay? Shocker.
Reply@c:
ReplyWhy does there only have to be one gay “one”….Prince Charles strikes me as gay…wouldn’t be surprised. And if his father is gay, chances are he is….I feel it is a genetic trait in a lot of cases (if trait is the correct word). I’ve known friends where it has been a thing that was passed down. I also think Harry doesn’t look much like Charles, whereas, William does. Not proof, but something I’ve found interesting.
@Z:
ReplyHe might still love Camilla…and be gay or bi.
i think i heard once of a straight celebrity.
Replyis every celebrity gay?
Replysir Ian,
Isn’t simpler to tell us who is straight,it is?
Charles!!!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyCharles!!!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s all LIES, LIES I TELL YOU!!!
Charles is a decent family man. Especially when Camilla is the “man”.
Reply@section9:funny
ReplyI have a scoop: everybody who post here is gay except me: because i know all about me.
ReplyThis is an old rumor. At least a decade ago, one of the tabs had a story about gay shenanigans involving Prince Charles. It seems one of his very favortie confidantes/servants had succumbed to Aids. And Prince Charles was reported to be heartbroken.
Whenever a white male celeb goes ga-ga over Barbra Streisand, that’s a big clue right there. It’s similar to a white males’ obssession with Broadway musicals. And Prince Charles did express his infatuation for BS.
Anyway, an American mag published nude photos ot the prince about a dozen yrs ago. He wasn’t aware he was being photographed. Although the photos were grainy, it was easy to see it was indeed Prince Charles.
ReplyPrince Harry looks like his grandfather Prince Phillip and the only way that happened is because he (Harry) was fathered by Charles (who looks a lot like Phillip). All 3 men have the same long noses, bleached out eyebrows and ruddy complexions. This story has gone on for years. And then they say Harry is James Hewitt’s son because they both have red hair. But Diana’s brother Charles and sister Sarah have red hair. Its in her genes. Besides Diana was way too savvy to ever screw up something like that. She knew her children would be in line for the throne.
Besides, wasn’t Prince Edward the one the tabs figured was gay? Why isn’t this male prostitute talking about him?
Denis Thatcher I totally believe. David Beckham? noooooooooooooooo! (say its ain’t so Joe)
ReplyJames Hewitt not Prince Harry’s father: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081106092220AAL4B9q
More evidence: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2273498.stm
ReplyIAN, as you are trying so desperately to get your site shut down why don’t you make up some salacious gossip about mohammed omar and taliban downlow parties?
ReplyFuck me, that’s hilarious! Jesus Christ cld these people get any more bizarre?! Dennis Thatcher, well I can’t say I really care & when ur married 2 chick with a dick maggie its no great surprise really! Well Prince Harry is obviously 2 most people with eyes, not charles’ son. Its not just the hair, charles & di both had huge noses & haz has a cute little button 1. Di & charles both had long faces, will has a long face but harry’s is round. Charles is balding, so is will but not our harry! U do the math. I know prince pip has a longstanding mistress which is pretty common in yah circles & obviously all the male servants in the palace r gay so its no surprise. There was the “happy finish” story about charles a few yrs back so he has form. I asked 1 of my friends about Edward as he is friends with them all & he said well lots of boys when they grow up think they might be gay, let’s just say he may have thought that 4a bit longer than most! Then there was his love of musical theatre…. Yeah straight as a die our edders! Well I’d never heard about camilla so that’s a new 1 & hilarious obviously. Beckham? Well I know he’s shagged every woman he can get his hands on 4 the last 15yrs so he clearly can’t keep it in his trousers. Re: men, there was a drama series called Footballers Wives on in the uk which had 1 character which was obviously meant 2b Beckham & he was bi so that did make me wonder…! What an interesting story 4a Fri morning, thanks Ian!
ReplyAs a brit, I would just like to say….I do not believe a word of this. I don’t doubt that many of Ian’s stories are valid and he sources are good but I do not believe this at all. Diana would not have kept that to herself and I never heard one mention of this. Also, as beautiful as David Beckham is (well, at least until he opens his mouth) and although he does dress well, I do not believe he is gay either.
ReplySo I was just thinking, David Beckham & Gordon Ramsay are good friends aren’t they???? Hmmmm….. Interesting!
ReplyOMG – Im soooo shocked – homosexuality in the royal family – no! sorry but tell us something we dont know. Which ever way he likes it, Camilla is his sole mate. JMO
ReplyLMAO! Prince Charles, the man who will be King. Also Queen. Imagine my complete (lack of) shock!
Reply@HisHighness:
ReplyDo you know why Brangelina did not take part to the party AMFAR (against AIDS) , presided by Sharon Stone and Bill Clinton, yesterday in Cannes?
They were supposed to be there.
@meg:
ReplyAn interview of Brad in french in cannes. He says he loves Angelina and his children.
http://fr.news.yahoo.com/5/20090522/ten-brad-pitt-je-suis-amoureux-et-j-ai-l-e95f385.html
@ meg – maybe she was afraid of bumping into an old conquest….!
ReplySo if Dennis Thatcher was into men, was dear old Maggie into chicks? Now that would be, uh, gruesome!
Reply@ffleur:
ReplyAbout Beckam: being married with Victoria can justify you become gay.
Am I the only one who is shocked at this? Have I been living under a rock? LOL. Prince Charles gay?!! Prince Harry is the ginger one, right? He’s a hottie. A bit loose with the tongue… but hot.
Beckham bisexual? No way! LOL. Seriously. I’m actually shocked at this. Well, Beckham is definitely too hot to keep all that to just one gender. Can’t say that I blame him.
ReplyI like Bonny Prince Charlie and if he’s gay I really don’t care. I Iike his concern for the einvironment and organic gardening. I especially like his crusae some time ago against ugly architecture. I atm constantly amazed when I look around at so much crap. The ones building must have thought that the shit they built looked good……but damn those nasty buildings are a blight on our world. He had the guts to call them on it and good for him.
ReplyCharles could have lived a typical Eurotrash existence but he has not and I like him (but LOVED wacky Diana – she was messed up but so what!)
@Keane:
ReplyThat’s what I thought too. If he kicked her to the curb, that would be a little awkward.
Speaking of Sharon Stone – her legs looked better in a short dress that I saw a Cannes picture of than did you know who. Sharon must be edging toward the latter 50’s right? Too funny.
Hi. Can’t stay PC doesn’t work. Fangelina face yikes
Replyanne curry yikes
Beckham,Will Smith ~Cruise sure knows how to pick ‘em -I’m jealous
peace out
keep it up Ian
@ Vittorio – hm I’m not such a fan of old Charlie boy I have to say. I think he’s a spoilt, entitled egotist who thinks what he has to say counts just because he happens to descend from the clan that happened to take control of power in England many hundreds of years ago (I am not a royalist, in case you didn’t notice!). Plus the tax payer funds him and his dodgy relatives to the tune of tens of millions of pounds a year to turn up at a few functions and open the odd building. Nice work if you can get it hey? Meanwhile his personal wealth through the estate of the Duchy of Cornwall grows into hundreds of millions. Not a bad life being a royal is it? I personally don’t think he has a right to a platform to give his views on anything. He was not elected by the population of the UK, why should what he thinks counts. He probably is an ok kind of guy, but royalty in general makes me quite furious, there really is no such thing. All people are equal and the fact that we still call people Kings and Queens and Princes and Princesses in this enlightened society I find mind-boggling. I think the general argument for continuing to fund them is that they bring in money through tourism. All I can say is that I hope they do because they’re all sitting in their palaces laughing at us poor tax-paying fools while pouring another gin and tonic. They are out touch and out of date, off with all of their heads!
Reply@ KvK – I wonder what had happened to you, that was hilarious! Hope you’re back when your PC is better!
Reply@ meg – re Beckham and Vicky B, ITA. If he could have had any woman and now maybe men on earth, why did he go for that? If you’re not a Brit did you know that David Beckham was not that famous at all when he got hitched to Vicks. He was known by football fans but if you didn’t care about football, you didn’c are about him. It was Vicks who turned him into a star, totally made him over, changed his hair, his clothes everything. Was David a famewhore riding on a Spice Girl’s coat-tails like another individual we all know and love I wonder? Just a theory…..
Reply@Keane:
ReplyGod, she’d have to move to Mars then, LOL
@meg:
Wasn’t she only supposed to have two days off?
Maybe Sharon Stone just didn’t invite them. She had Clinton, she didn’t need Brangie. hehehe
Reply@meg:
ReplyExactly—Gosh you’re married to the most gorgeous man on earth (minus the tats), you’re fabulously wealthy; you get to wear great clothes (most of the time), would it kill you to smile once in a while?
@Keane:
ReplyI totally agree about the entire concept of royalty. You should seriously kick them all to the curb.
No doubt there is also much wrong with Charles. I’m just saying that given the system that is in place, he handles it pretty well.
Def throw the bums out. It no doubt costs you guys a fortune. Maybe you could throw their stuff in the street like when people get evicted…..hahaha
Morning everyone!! Happy Friday.
RE Charles: Who cares if he’s gay. I don’t. I care more that the Monarchy is sitting on millions of pounds for just existing, England really really needs to get rid of this archaic Monarchy and emerge into a Democratic Society and get people working again, pay a good wage and get the long timers off the dole. Its ridiculous that people can sit around getting paid and not work, because they make more on the dole then they can make at a job. I say this with all respect and knowledge. My family still lives in England, my daughter is in Brighton and my husband is from Scotland. Another reason to hate them: I saw pics of Edward beating his dogs!!! I can’t believe PETA wasn’t up his ass but it all died away.
RE this tell-all book: I’m not saying this guy doesn’t have insider information, Im just surprised he will be allowed to publish it. I would think the attorneys for these high powered people would be all over him like white on rice. He better be careful or he might end up dead in a mangled car in a French tunnel. JMHO
ReplyAnd about Di–She was the best thing to ever happen to the gene pool.
But, I don’t get her remorse about Prince Charlene. Let’s see: I get to live in a castle surrounded by fantastic art, I get to wear designer clothes, I get to wear amazing jewelry, I get driven around in a jag, I get to travel the world first class and stay in the best hotels/estate/villas, etc., I get to meet interesting people–both famous and everyday, I can have something on the side if I want as long as I’m discreet, I can do all the charity work if I want, AND I DON’T have to shtupp that fugly inbred?
That’s called getting your cake and eating it, too!
ReplyIan, how do you KNOW FOR A FACT that Charles and DIana did not have sex for two years (thus Harry is not Charles’ biological son)? You know how stupid and childish that sounds? Were you in the bedroom with them? You don’t know for a fact. You’re only guessing based on theories and dubious gossip. No ONE knows for a fact what goes on in people’s bedrooms except them.
Reply@stinky-inky:LMAO! teee=heeee Prince Charlene GODD ONE!!
Reply@ Caribsmom – to be fair we our a democracy, the Queen is only a figurehead she has no constituional power which only begs the questions what on earth is the point of her then?! Its such an anacrhonism to me in the modern world, I think they should be disbanded or moved on or something, you know like they do with vagrants! They are completely pointless. We do have good wages in the UK, maybe not as good as the States but generally better than most of the world. The problem is we also have a very good benefits system which is great in ensuring that most people don’t end up starving or on the streets (different to the US in which unemployment only lasts 6 months, what are people supposed to do after that, starve? Its mind-blowing to me). The problem is certain people in society get too much. For example if you are a teenager and get pregnant you are allowed to claim benefits and get fasttracked to the top of the waiting list for a council flat which is also paid for by the taxpayer. You are then allowed to live off benefits with no necessity to get a job until that child is 11 or 12 I believe. They are now trying to change this age to 5 but I don’t think it has gone through parliament yet. This really blows my mind. Most people when having children think can I afford to have them, how will I pay for them, who will look after them when I am at work and so on? And yet if you are on benefits there is no onus on you to work whatsoever, simply because you have a child. This truly blows my mind. Yes it is good that less young women are forced to give up their children for adoption because they can’t provide for them, but it means that we now have generations of families who have never worked and live off the state. Some large families have incomes of hundreds of thousands a year from the state. They then say they can’t afford to work because they could never get a job that would pay that much, and somehow they are not penalised for it because they have children. But then if you removed people’s benefits who would suffer, the children, which is why it doesn’t happen. Its one messed-up, sorry state of affairs but its one area that I think really must be changed. Its just not fair to working people at all.
ReplyGod “are a democracy” not “our”! Sorry I am a bit sleep deprived again!
ReplyI think Prince Harry is looking more like Charles and I don’t think Diana would be that stupid but I’ve been wrong before.
ReplyPrince Charles is Gay, Camilla is into women….haven’t we heard this before? Oh Yes, Brad is Bi and Angie is Bi and really into women. Yawn. Back in the day, when tell all books were first coming out while Charles and Diana were still married…..it was reported that a “footman” or such walked into the library and caught Charles and Camilla on the floor behind a sofa doing the dirty. Said Camilla kept saying in her “words swollowed in her throat” voice, Ohhhh Charlessssssss….lol. They’ve been hot and dirty for one another for decades….Diana was just too young and inexperienced for Charles after his non-stop boinking of Camilla. I would question who the father of Camilla’s children is rather than Dianas. Saying something is so….does not make it thus. Prince Harry’s father’s identify was proven decades ago as well, after said author published false reports that he was not. A bit late to be digging up that proven dead horse? Silly all of this….
Reply@ Patty Anne – really did they, did they do a DNA test on Harry? I have never heard that before.
Reply@Keane:
ReplyAlso an anti monarchist here but I am not a Brit so don’t want to piss of my Brit friends on this blog. Agree with all that you have said, however. Also, well known to most that the “Windsors” are actually the Saxe-Coburg_Gotha family having been the result of the marriage of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. It was in 1917 that HRH Albert ordered the royal family (fearing anti German sentiment) to discard their name and adapt the Windsor family name. The surname of Prince Philip and HRH is actually Mountbatten-Windsor. More embarrassing still is the royal families ties to Nazi sympathizers, Prince Philip’s known eugenics preferences and the long chattered rumor that WWS (Wallis Simpson) was a hermaphrodite. Ok, there is some royal dirt to dish until we have another AJ update.
IMO charles&Camilla are the real deal. Does anyone remember the Camillagate scandal? On my phone so have to type out the link-hope it works. http://www.flashbacks.se/bibliotek/80/677/camillatxt/
Reply@joanne:
ReplyRegardless of our feelings about Diana as I am sure they are quite mixed even on this board, it is good to realize that Diana was also a master manipulator of the media. Which goes to show us that what is “real” and what is “real according to the media” are often quite different things. I do not believe Diana was “that stupid” however, I do believe that she was initially quite naive to the real ways of royal life even though she too was an aristocrat. I believe the chatter about Harry’s paternity has merit. I would guess that a DNA test has been done, don’t know if the results are published, not really in the loop on that, but he does have more than a passing resemblance to Hewitt. At the time of Diana’s death (and that is yet another conspiracy story-many theories about it) she was reinventing herself as a humanitarian, much like we see other high profile people doing today in an effort to have their image refreshed and reimagined by the public. There is also the Dr. Kahn issue-he being reportedly the “real” love of her life and Dodi Fayed being a convenient trick to make Dr. Kahn jealous-combined with Old Man Fayed’s ongoing campaign against the royals, Dodi made a perfect match in that respect. Anyway, just throwing this out there as I love the gossip about the Royals.
@Keane:
ReplyNo, they never did a DNA test. A couple of summers ago Harry was insisting he take a DNA test to prove that James Hewitt wasn’t his father but the palace shot that idea down fast. I think Harry wants to take one just so he can have an answer and tell everyone to back off.
@Keane:
ReplyHi Keane – or the headless-wonder Mr. Bill was afaid of “bumping” into her – or maybe the entire hotel would have burst into flames if the slutty Ms. Stone bumped into the evil Ms. Jole!
@Keane:
ReplyLook out Keane – she got your phone number! Ha ha
@backalleyknees:
ReplyHow do we know, though, other than what the media tells us? I would bet anything that a DNA test WAS done, hell, it is likely done to all royals at birth. What the results were, either way, will never become public knowledge unless it is to the advantage of the royals to let the commoners know. IMHO:)
@Canuck:
ReplyHI Canuck – that’s funny – but I bet the evil Ms. Jolie even has her tentacles into Mars! Time and space mean nothing to the Dark Queen!
@Constant Gardner:
ReplyThere is a certain type of British man (and women) who have that red hair and the “rawboned” (for lack of a better word) appearance. Tilda Swinton comes to mind. Anyways, Hewitt has brown eyes doesn’t he? And Harry has blue, as did Diana and as does Charles. She’d have been taking a hell of a chance if she were carrying the baby of a brown eyed man, since blue+blue=blue if I remember my science classes correctly.
@stinky-inky:
ReplyGood one Stinky!
anyone up for another IUCTV tv show soon? let me know. Bon weekend!
Reply@HisHighness:
ReplyWould love it but it crashes my computer, wahhhhh
Considering the royal penchant for throwing the nonheir to the throne to wolves, (Andy and Fergie’s marriage to quash rumors about Charles & Di) wouldn’t surprise me if rumors about Edward were circulated to protect Charles. As for Camilla’s children I thought there were rumors about her daughter being Charle’s.
ReplyI think the DNA has been done and Harry’s been told to shut up. Of course he does like his booze and weed so it may come out someday.
@ladybert62:
Mr. Bill? Another Aniston “dig” at AJ? Is she “Mr. Sluggo” as we have been wondering?
http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m4d18-Jennifer-Aniston–Refers-to-Brad-Pitt-as-Mr-Bill
ReplyI have inside info on Edward though, I was at college with someone who is friends with the whole royal family, he was a member of the aristocracy. Came back from Royal Ascot one day and said he’d been chatting to “Liz”. I was like my God, do people call her that, that’s hilarious! Another friend was at school with Prince William, was living in the same house as him when Diana died. No dirt on him that I know, my friend says he is a very nice guy, which he seems to be. Woah I never heard that about Camilla’s daughter, God that would be interesting wouldn’t it? All I can say from the posh people I met at college was that it was quite common for the husbands to have a long-term, long-standing mistress, so you would assume love children are also highly possible. Its weird, in posh circles “divorce” is seen as something of a no-no, rather these long-standing mistress arrangements were accepted, by the couple at least. Some of my friends were quite fucked up about it though, nice when you walk past the local restaurant and see your dad in there wining and dining his mistress. I tell you, its a different world!
ReplyDid you see there are now two Angelina hates dogs stories now? Do we think this is another AJ is not into bestiality story? Thing is though, this guy is really slating her. He calls her fake, manipulative, homewrecking etc etc. Do we really think it is coming from her? @Canuck:
Reply@Constant Gardner:
Do you believe any of those theories though? Do any of them actually hold any water? I’m not much of a conspiracy theorist myself, especially not in that scenario, I could be wrong though obviously!
And also did Dodi Fayed have a campaign against the Royals? I thought he loved the royal connection because the British govt refused to give him British citizenship which he desperately wanted. That’s why he was so hung up on it and pushed Dodi into it. Dodi had another girlfriend at the time. According to Tara Palmer-Tompkinson, also friends with all the royal family, Fayed was horrible to Dodi, treated him like shit. I think that’s why Fayed now feels massively guilty and can’t let the conspiracy theory thing go. It was his idea to push Dodi into it, Dodi was trying to please his father, and the man driving the car was drunk and was one of Fayed’s men I think. Or do you mean he has a campaign against them now?
ReplyLook at me I am successfully using the reply button, hurrah!
Reply@HisHighness:
ReplySure. But please record it… it’s a holiday weekend and all.
@Keane:
Well, I’d like to think the Pollo Loco story came from Jen, because it’s pretty darned funny given the context. He may be getting fed from more than one source for all we know. Or the “Dogs hate AJ” isn’t aimed at the dog-fucking rumours, but are rather aimed at making AJ look psycho, as friendly dogs (of which both of the races listed are) don’t react to people like that unless they sense a threat/danger.
The creator of Mr. Bill was from New Orleans and as the official home page puts it:
Walter Williams was the creator (and namesake) of the little Play-Doh doll, Mr. Bill. In every film, Mr. Bill was dismembered and smashed by the vicious Mr. Sluggo with the help of evil Mr. Hands. Not exactly the height of adult comedy, but Mr. Bill was undoubtedly one of Saturday Night’s most popular characters ever.
http://www.mrbill.com/MBHist2.html
You know, Ian mentioned spousal abuse in the Bruni/Jolie post. Maybe the Mr. Bill thing is coincidence, but given the N.O. connection and Mr. Bill getting beat up every time, maybe it’s not.
Reply@Keane:
ReplyWoohoo! lol
Would such a tell-all book really come out in “jolly Olde England” – I think it would be squashed faster than a bed bug! I did not read the “tell-alls” re the lovely Diana – were they really tell-alls? I think the Royals have so much power that this type of book would be “edited” by the Royals and/or not allowed to be published. Dang, am home sick today because my back went “out” and now my neighbor is tarring his roof which explains the killer migrane I have!
Reply@Keane:
ReplyKeane – I am proud of you – I thought you just didnt like using it!
Probably mostly bullshit, but it sounds like a fun trashy read just like this site in fact…
Reply@Canuck:
I read that Pollo Loco story and the picture they use for JA looks doctored. Look at her nose and mouth. It looks weird.
http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m5d21-Jennifer-Aniston–Has-El-Pollo-Loco-meals-shipped-to-set-of-new-film
Reply@Angie’s Fax Machine:
ReplyI think it might be prior to her having a nose job.
@Canuck:
I think he enhanced her nose. The enhancement then gave her mouth a weird down-curve thing on her top lip.
http://www.celebrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/jennifer-aniston-nose-job-poll-2-6-07.jpg
Reply@ ladybert62 – no, I’ll blame it on laziness and IT not being my strongest point!
Re: The Examiner – I’ve never bothered to look at it before but now I have I have to say I disagree with Kate’s assessment. Its definitely anti-Ange, pro-Jen to me. He crucifies Ange. Not sure what was going on with those bodyguard stories though, maybe they were from Ange’s camp to try to counter his dislike of AJ? That would make more sense to me.
T@ladybert62:
Reply@Constant Gardner:
ReplyI agree with her being quite naive when she first started but caught on quickly on how to manipulate the press. It just looks to me as Harry gets older he looks more like Charles. I seen the side by side pictures of Harry and Hewitt and he sort of looked like him when he was younger, but now now. I have a feeling Harry wishes he wasn’t a royal.
@Keane:
With the story they did on Jen and Pollo Loco. Jen is the picture of health. She exercises and eats well. Why would she be ordering Pollo Loco once a week and devouring it. It discredits her healthy living IMO.
“Besides the chicken, Ms. Aniston loves El Pollo Loco french fries and mash potatoes.” I don’t believe she eats this once a week. Perhaps once a month, but not once a week. I don’t think this story came from Jen’s camp. If it did come from Jen’s camp, then I think it would be to make AJ look like an anorexic/bulimic fool. Otherwise, I think it’s supposed to discredit JA.
Reply@HisHighness:
ReplyCan it be saved to a YouTube post later? Whatever the format is that you are using is making my computer crash. Is it a live chat or is it a video chat or how does it work? I might be able to bypass using my browser which crashes by substituting another program.
@Angie’s Fax Machine:
ReplyNo, Brad had a job when he was younger and not a star dressed up as the Pollo Loco chicken, LOL.
@Angie’s Fax Machine:
Really? I think Kate thought it was some sort of joke on Jen’s part? About licking the bone clean. Some sort of reference to AJ? Not sure what though. Where are you Kate please can you explain?
Reply@Canuck:
ReplyYeah, I know about that LOL. I just think that it is being used to mess with Jen. But I can see how this article can be used to make fun of AJ and BP.
I don’t think this Daryl guy likes any of the Bermuda Triangle parties.
http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m5d1-Jennifer-Aniston-has-bad-breath
Reply@HisHighness:
ReplyYes! Absolutely.
I hope the author makes extra copies and stores them in a safe place. Always felt that should be the thing to do wherever he/she lives.
It seems that by the time any book comes out it is tampered with in such a way that it is no longer very interesting. Case in point: the “expose” of tiny Tom Cruise by A. Morton. It appears that the cult of scientology got to AM, and it was watered down by the time it came out.
Here in America, there is an author, Darwin Porter, who dishes on celebs even going back to the silents era. He has outed many big names. But by now, one is hardly surprised at any of this. (speaking for myself, of course.)
Many yrs ago, there was a columnist, Hedda Hopper, who wrote for The Los Angeles Times. In one of her columns, she dared to print that the late actors, Michael Wilding (once the husband of Elizabeth Taylor) and Stewart Granger (then, the husband of Jean Simmons) were lovers. She was sued by MW and lost, which began her downward spiral and the eventual loss of her power.
Well, lo and behold, Darwin Porter surprised us with the outing of Stewart Granger. He writes that many a superstar of that time, Cary Grant, esp. tried their best to seduce SG. He wrote that only Marlon Brando succeeded.
Stewart Granger was a big boxoffice star for MGM, who specialized in action/swashbuckling films. He was a magnetic, masculine actor in his heyday. I can’t think of anyone today who can match him. Oh sure, they may be better dramatic actors; but he was wasn’t bad, himself.
So until the book comes out, I won’t be anticipating anything but powerful sources interfering with the content, or worse! JMO!
ReplyIt makes sense that David Beckam could swing both ways- he’s friends with Tommy Boy isn’t he ?
Reply@Z:
thats not proven dude.
Reply@HisHighness:
ReplySure!
@ffleur:
ReplyAs Harry get older he looks less and less like James Hewitt…and he kind of looks like a young Queen E. in some pics. So although it’s interested me, I would be more prone to believe, as someone wrote, that Diane was probably too smart to get pregnant by someone else. But you never know….like most of this stuff.
Not sure that this is true:), but thanks for a post.
ReplyJoker
Well i say, what a shocker. Charles is most likely sexual BI, only has sex with men, doesnt connect with them in a relationship way. aka fergie, not the royal but the popstar.(or in my experiance every self identified bisexual ive ever met)
ReplyHarry im not bothered about, to me he seems enough like charles for it not to be questioned much. Wouldnt be to surprised if harry himself knew something we dont, so acts up in the way he does.
Oh and if it does turn out camilla swings slightly in the direction of women, im going to seriously consider changing my sexual preference.
I have never heard rumours before that Charles is gay. Although there were rumours about a valet, I thought the general concensus was that it was Edward who was more likely gay, or, the later gossip says, their cousin David. I personally cant stand Charles, but I have to admit that he and Camilla appear to be totally, romantically and physically in love – hence the tampax tapes! Sorry, this story is rubbish.
I was watching Dianas funeral, watching the boys walking behind their mothers coffin, and it cut to a scene inside the abbey, and I couldnt work out how Harry was now inside the church, but it was Dianas red headed sister and HER son, who is the SPIT of Harry, or at least was then. Thats where he gets his looks from, the Spencers, not James Hewitt.
JMO, obviously
Reply@karenab:
ReplyOoh, and Philip is ALLEGEDLY quite a womaniser – quite decidedly not gay!
Just rumour and supposition though , not stated as fact.
Thank you for that clarification. I assumed ( hanging head low for being an ASSumer) that they had gone through with the DNA testing at Harry’s insistance. He’s looking more and more like a mix of the best of both Charles and Diana every day, so i suppose it really doesn’t matter. However, William is spitting image of Diana and her Spencer brother, so if they want to accuse one, why not the other?@backalleyknees:
ReplyI once saw a photo of Brad’s Polo Loco Chicken Suit…and laughed so hard at the thought of Brad Pitt wearing that thing! That has to be one of those memorable moments in one’s life one would rather forget….good for Jen reminding Brad of his benginnings@Angie’s Fax Machine:
ReplyI don’t care whether Charles is gay or straight. He’s alright. Basically people like Charles and Beckham do not make anti-comments about gays or offend anyone. They are not screaming homophobes and even if they are bearding, blame society for alienating gays, instead of picking on those that have to, either out of duty or career choice, but do not make anti-gay comments or align themselves with right wingers to cover what they may be.
Ian, you are a total moron. You need a banner hanging from your house saying “Here lives the world’s biggest cunt, come and egg my house”. Because that’’s what you are.
Reply@Kate:
Replybb14. I think it was Andrew Morton I read all his books on Diana. One of the rumours that has been going around for years is that James Hewitt is Harry’s father but none of the royal family would do an dna. I am an Australia and I cannot stand Charles or Camilla. Of all thing rotten things that they did for Diana pissed me off the royal family. I can’t wait until Australia goes Republic and dumps the Queen.
@Give me a break:
Replybb14. Then why don’t they do an DNA and establish who the Father is? no way because they are scared of who it might be.
I was over in the UK when all the trouble sparked that the Royal Family had not come back from Sandringham to be with the public. ( You would have remembered that keane) They then walked along St James Palace and looked at all the flowers. I am sorry but I am not a believer in the Royal Family, I think that they are a waste of space particularly in my Country, and the quicker we go Republic the better it will be. We here could not stand the thought of having King Charles and Queen Camilla as head of our Country.
Reply@HisHighness:
bb14. Bring it on
Replybb14. I posted on the other site about when AJ tipped water over his laptop. I remember saying that he was looking at Jens new figure but I remember now, it was a picture put on the internet by the New York Post showing a photo of Jen’s new nose job. And that is what Brad was looking at when AJ saw him gazing at Jen’s photo, and that’s why she tipped water over the laptop. Jealousy is a curse.
ReplyStarting to doubt this website??!! So far none of the so called shocker gossip has any ring of merit. Where’s the pregnant Sudanese model who was supposedly about to tackle Brad at Cannes? All that rubbish about Angelina being suicidal and having split from Pitt ages back. It’s all a load of steaming b-s … the so called “sources” must sit in a darkened room, their heads frying on pharaceuticals, as they invent absolute fiction.
ReplyThanks for the big laugh, Mr. Halperin! Next IUC exclusive:
THE LOCH NESS MONSTER IS GAY !
Keep it comin’!
ReplyOf course we all know that gays among the royals is nothing new.
ReplyRe: the tampax statement allegedly made by Prince Charles. I wonder how many americans had the same reaction I did; which was, “yeccch!”
There is one thing hanging over Prince Charles’ head; and that is the way he treated Princess Di. It will always be etched in our minds; well at least many of us.
But another thing that got a negative reaction from me: A photo of Charles, smiling. His teeth are a yellow-ish color. Here in america, that is another ugly image for the prince.
si es gay o no no me inporta solo se que si esta con migo no se olvida mas lo puedo afirmar soy maria reresa de tandil argentina
Reply