IUC Exclusive: Tarantino Eyes second half of Brangie for next Film – Flinstone Style? Angie Goes To Cannes to Shmooze Tarantino for Starring Role in His Next Film

Posted on May 20th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Angie Jolie is only in Cannes to charm her way into Quentin Tarantino’s next film as the leading lady.  This has been confirmed from several sources close to Brangie and Tarantino.  Tarantino has his eyes on the other half of Brangie for his next film project, according to one of the eccentric director’s physical fitness instructors.  According to the instructor Tarantino, in Cannes to promote his new flick starring Brad Pitt “Inglorious Basterds”, has long been obsessed with several of Jolie’s body parts. Tarantino, according to the woman, is infatuated with Angelina Jolie and is convinced he can direct her to more Oscar glory.  Tarantino’s instructor issued a warning to Jolie to wear socks during filming.  “Quentin has a foot fetish,” she said.  “He loves woman’s feet.  A lot of times during our session I have caught him dozing off, looking point blank at my toes.  We’ve joked about it many times.  He admits he loves feet.  He told me the first thing he does to a woman is suck her toes.  If they taste good then he’s hooked.”  The instructor says she once asked Tarantino who he thinks has the sexiest tootsies in Hollywood and without hesitation she says Tarantino replied, “definitely Angelina Jolie”.  An actor friend who has worked with Tarantino over the years told IUC that the Kill Bill Director has been eyeing Jolie for years.  “He’s dying to work with her,” the actor said.  “He wants to make Angie his next Uma (Thurman).” Meanwhile, Pitt was evasive and squirmed during his NBC interview today.  Developing…

  1. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:20 am

    So now we know why AJ is in Cannes for IB.

    Reply
  2. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    Well, in addition to the photo op, of course!

    Reply
  3. anna said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    They can both suck each other’s toes. Maybe at the same time. He is as gross as she is.

    Reply
  4. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:24 am

    Can’t you just see AJ & QT lying head-to-foot on a bed somewhere having an orgy of toe-sucking!!

    When I was in college I met a guy at a party who admitted to having a foot fetish and he creeped me out…told a story of stealing shoes someone tossed onstage during a David Bowie concert (Let’s Dance). Ugh.

    Reply
  5. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:25 am

    Good thing he doesn’t have a hand fetish, LOL

    Reply
  6. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    Ehhhh fuck. Not even close to what I hoped it would be about.

    A foot fetish? Big deal.

    Probably enough to get AJ’s attention though, given that QT is evidently into the bdsm scene. She’ll get off on the power exchange between the two of them as they make this movie.

    Reply
  7. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    I could see her in one of his fims, as mentioned in another post, his movies are like cartoons with real people. Lara Croft anyone?

    Reply
  8. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:28 am

    Wow, I bet Uma Thurman will be DELIGHTED with that comparison. Didn’t she refer to Ms Holie features as being something akin to the “town pump”? How pleased she will be with that….!

    Reply
  9. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:28 am

    I can say in all honesty that I have never been fascinated by toes! Why in the world someone has a toe/foot/shoe fetish is totally and completely beyond my pea-brained comprehension. Does someone out there understand this? :D

    Reply
  10. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    So the also-strange Mr. Tarantino has been lusting after the evil Ms. Jolie’s toes! Dang, I wonder if he and the hapless Mr. Pitt discussed this during Inglorious Basterds production – perhaps hapless wants to get even with also-strange and thus personally recommended the Dark Queen’s toes to him!!

    Reply
  11. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    @ladybert62:
    Yes. ;) But it’s not my fetish.

    I’m off for a nap, slept badly last night. Hope when I return there’s some video footage of the red carpet walk faux show.

    Have a good day all.

    Reply
  12. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    @too curious:
    69. if they are at the same height. if not, one of them will have a back ache… LOL
    what is wrong with this people?

    Reply
  13. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    @sheen:

    Yeah, like Ladybert said on the other thread, when do these people have time to get any work done???

    Reply
  14. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Well, my view of the world continues to expand to new horizons thanks to this site! Goodness gracious there are many toe fetish sites out there on the web. Well, guess this will take some checking into for me to understand. :-)

    Reply
  15. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    @too curious:

    doesn’t seem like these “major” stars actually have to do much work. sit around on set all day for an hour or two of “work.” film for 8-12 weeks, then take a couple of months “off” to wait for their manager to tell them what project they should do next.

    also, QT’s best films are behind him. IB is going to bomb. AJ probably doesn’t see it that way — hell, she was in Wanted afterall — she likes to make those kid-friendly movies, doncha know. JMO.

    Reply
  16. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    I could see QT and AJ working together. They both like violent flicks and such. Although, I thought that he liked to revive people’s careers a la John Travolta and Pam Grier. Either way, can’t say that I would knock that combo (QT/AJ). He should write some sort of comedic script for her… see how well she handles humor.

    Reply
  17. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    QT has a history of bedding his leading ladies, i remember Rose McGowan went ga-ga over him for some time. Personally, i think QT and Angie would make a perfect pairing each being weird, with perverted sex habits, narcissistic personalities,craving power…yes, they would be a good fit. Also, i believe Angie is as BBT stated when she and Brad hooked up, bored with “life with the Football Captain” and ready to rock and roll her bad ass, perverted self. I’m expecting Angie to give up physical custody of the kids…five of them actually, i firmly believe she has future plans for Maddox, and will therefore keep physical custody of him. It’s as if time had reversed itself.

    Reply
  18. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:44 am

    wow good going IAN getting in pretty close to camp there and that person is going to be fired LOL hoped you got all you could first haha QT has a ugly body toes or not and he is a freak jmo

    Wonder if she will still be interested if all the reviews on IB are as bad as The Guardian,

    Ouch!

    go IAN!

    IAN will there be any surprises for the masses about the Brange at Cannes or the Triangle or the Sudanese girl?

    Reply
  19. magnolia said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    Who knew that to get into films, you could be talentless as long as your toes were considered sexy? She should be insulted, but I’m sure she’s flattered. Any “real” actress would want their talent as an actor to be the reason for being cast. He’s as pathetic as she is. Ugh.

    Reply
  20. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    @ Patty Anne – wow I did not know that about QT and Rose MacGowan, she was beautiful before she fucked her face up quite a bit with the accident and surgery (well she’s sitll hot, just not quite as perfect as she once was). Lucky old QT. Just shows what being a successful HW Director can do for one’s pulling power! Can’t imagine him having quite such an allure when he was still working at the video store. These people are all gross though IMO, the power players use the actresses for sex because they wouldn’t get anyone near as hot on their own terms, the actresses use the power players for parts because they would never have that great a career on talent alone. All so gross.

    Reply
  21. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:51 am

    @ladybert62:

    I was commenting just yesterday to a friend that there seems to be a website for EVERYTHING – but I was refering to the fact that I find a site with links to buy a certain type of dinosaur toy for the friend’s dinosaur crazy 4 year old.

    No surprise that there would be a LOT of websites devoted to fetishes, kinky practices, S&M etc. Like-minded people like to connect with each other. Like us, but we’re just sarcastic snarky intellectuals lol!

    Reply
  22. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:53 am

    @too curious:

    Oops, meant to add “and not freaks” (at least not that kind, I don’t think)

    Reply
  23. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    They were kissing yesterday
    See

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/brad-and-angie-k-i-s-s-i-n-g-t225308.html

    Reply
  24. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    @Keane:

    Yep. I just have this image of Hollywood as a swimming pool brimming with STDs and everybody just dives in regardless. Gross! Bur I bet big pharma loves HW – they must make a fortune on the antibiotics alone!

    Reply
  25. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:56 am

    I just watched the Ann Curry interview with Brad in Canne. Brad seems very defenceless, weak, totally on the brink. He did make it obvious to Ann that he was there to discuss QT’s movie, and not his personal life. It’s going to take a lot of loving people to get him through what Hollywood’s Garbage Va-ja- ja has put him thought. I’d say he’s a broken man right now….but hopefully with love and help from his family and Jen, will come through better than before the attack of The Dark Queek

    Reply
  26. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    @ too curious – good point, that’s hilarious! I wonder if HW is in fact just one big creation of the pharmaceuticals industry? Maybe they created this whole HW film industry business just so they can rake in the cash from sales of the meds necessary to treat them all? Hey its a bit of a long-shot conspiracy theory, but seeing as we’re all cranks (especially me, or am I Ian I can never seem to remember quite which…?!) I think I’m going to go with it. What do you think?!

    @ Patty Anne – do you have a link to it, is it on youtube yet? To be honest I don’t particularly feel like watching it if it is as you described. Poor man, what on earth has been going on to leave him in that state. I know break-ups are stressful especially when you are in the ridiculous position of having acquired 6 kids in 4 or 5 years but presumably its more than that. I guess he was incredibly naive when he got himself into all this and had no idea what it was going to turn out like. I suspect he was also far too trusting. I don’t think he got quite what he bargainned for did he now?

    Reply
  27. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    @Patty anne:
    I thought he looked great in that interview and he sounded good (to me at least). He sounded a lot more endearing and not nearly as pretentious, if pretentious at all, as he has in the past 5 years. He barely mentioned his family life for a change. He sounded more at peace in this interview. Not that he’s completely at peace, but just more calm in my opinion. Can’t get over at how good he’s looking… must be the sun LOL.

    Reply
  28. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    @sama:
    i notice he did not hold her or pull her to him though… it was all AJ.

    Reply
  29. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:05 am

    @Keane:
    Brad Pitt interview Today Show:

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/30842332#30842332

    Reply
  30. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:06 am

    @Keane:

    Ian has the link in his posting above

    Reply
  31. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:06 am

    eeeeeewwww jolies feet are defo not ’sexy’ they look like goddam flippers with veins.no what has happened is pitt has told qt that he can’t throw off the drug taking,dog fcuking,orgy making,self-harming,child neglecting physco biatch, soooo equally wierd and gross qt thought i’ll have me summa that.what an inglorious bastard that qt is and imo he fell from the ‘ugly’ tree and got hit by every ‘ugly’ branch on the way down

    Reply
  32. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:06 am

    @sama:
    That kiss looks so weird. It looks a tad staged and lacks passion. And it also looks like he’s not doing much of reciprocating. Just my opinion.

    Reply
  33. chris said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    @magnolia:
    i don’t think that a “real” actress’s dream is to work for QT anyway

    Reply
  34. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    @Keane:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/20/brad-pitt-in-cannes-for-i_n_205646.html

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/30844995/

    See if you can open one of the above links.

    Reply
  35. omgwtflol said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:13 am

    I don’t get it. If Quentin is “dying” to work with Angie, why does she have to go to Cannes to charm her way into his next film? Wouldn’t he be chasing her?

    This is a flimsy attempt to answer why she is there after reporting that they were split and she has a restraining order against him. So what’s the status of that restraining order?

    As for the pics, why would two people who are supposedly at war with each other even get that close? On the red carpet, yeah, I’d call that PR. But in a dark corner of a restaurant? It does look like she was the aggressor, but that makes even less sense in light of the “restraining order” story or the story that Brad is fighting to take all of her kids from her.

    I wish Ian would explain.

    Reply
  36. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    @topbrit:

    Right on. You know the old saying about the size of a man’s hands relating to the size of another piece of his anatomy? Wonder if there is a corollary for how big AJ’s feet are?

    As always, anything and everthing I say in this and any other post is must my personal opinion, speculation, etc. and any further broadcast requires the express written consent of Major League Baseball/and or Ian.

    Hey, my snark is back on track today :)

    Reply
  37. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    re ‘the kissing’ yes i agree with sheen all her,her claw dragging his head into hell.was it even on the lips? didn’t look like it.he was not interested one iota no way.waddya you guys about her dress, do you see a bit of a pregnancy bump my god noooooo! i know sugar and ian said there isn’t a pregnancy but does that look like one your valued opinions please
    fyi sama gave the link to the kissing i believe

    Reply
  38. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:18 am

    @omgwtflol:

    It’s called PR, and attempting to control the timing of the actual confirmation of their split. And just because QT wants to work with AJ doesn’t mean she is who he has in mind for his NEXT project. And if there is a possibility of something illegal/seriously damaging about to come out about her I would think she would want to have as many signed contracts as possible beforehand.

    Also, that way she can tell herself she went to Cannes for herself, not for BP.

    Reply
  39. Caribsmom said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:18 am

    @sama:Again, the negative body language. AJ’s hand never actually touches his neck, then she closes her hand into a semi-fist, he looks at something off in the distance, and doesnt look like a mouth to mouth even. Then she gives him the fake Im so in love with you look, and he doesnt even smile at her. They are soooo over!!! IMO

    Reply
  40. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @ too curious – thanks for the reply.i was commenting on another yesterday and in my post i stated i was ‘just curious’ then went on to post not ‘thee just curious but etc etc,i had got your name too curious mixed up with just helping oops my humble apologies to you

    Reply
  41. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    He is so over it. Bit of a contrast to these shots
    http://www.bittenandbound.com/2008/01/10/angelina-jolie-and-brad-pitt-baby-number-five/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJyi55f1t1s

    Reply
  42. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    I thought it looked liked they were just chatting and she kissed him on the cheek, that was a tender moment between parents and then he saw the papa when she kissed his lips . It almost looks like a mom consoling her son after a break up LOL he does not appear to be touching her, he is wearing the arrival shirt and Jen necklace so imo this was of course PR but maybe also a private moment. He looks weary there .

    Reply
  43. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    @topbrit:

    Hmmm…lot of speculation yesterday that she was wearing her black muumuu to stoke pregnancy rumors – that and her visit to the trial @ The Hague to try to help counteract any negative stories about her that may be coming out any time soon.

    Reply
  44. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    I’ve always thought that Angie’s feet were the most revolting things that I’d ever seen…What wrong with that man……..

    Reply
  45. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    @topbrit:

    No worries!

    Reply
  46. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    @topbrit:
    I think it odd that she’s wearing a mumu again this year…maybe it’s the style? But I seem to recall that was her way of “telling” the world she was preggers before she wore that revealing black dress that showed off the bump last year…it was that hideous brown mumu thing she wore that got everyone talking “is she pregnant??”…It wouldn’t surprise me if she was. She’s all sorts of manipulative. But again, she could be wearing that to get people talking.

    And yes, the kissing photos looked staged in the sense that they knew paps were watching and waiting. He looks like, “Oh no, not again…” and she’s like, “K, ready? Lean in to me…that’s it….now kiss me you fool! And make it look good cause the paps are watching…”

    Reply
  47. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Thanks AFM and Sama for the link info. Yeah I agree with you AFM that I think he actually sounds pretty nice, relaxed and down-to-earth in that clip. He was obviously deflecting the questions about his personal life and the “on track” comment couldn’t be more telling really. He actually came across as being in a MUCH better place than he seems to have been in in recent months to me. Its probably early days but he looks like he’s going to be ok to me. It also pretty much confirms my opinion that he was really just a nice guy who just got in way over his head with Holie. Yeah he treated Jen in a shabby way, but he was probably walking on eggshells and doing all he could to please the harridan. I don’t know, I hope he puts as much distance between himself and the dirty wench as humanly possible and moves on with his life with whoever he chooses. Looks like this Ann Curry chick thinks she could be in with a shot from that grab at his face!!!! Jesus, I have never seen a journalist grab the face of their interviewee before! That was actually hilarious! He looked SO embarrassed, it was priceless!

    Reply
  48. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    LOOK AT THIS VIDEO of BP and AJ’s dinner last night in Cannes. OMG, what a play she is making for the cameras! Look at how she grabs his arms and carresses his hand. He doesn’t show any sign of affection at all! Looks like she wants to keep the charade going……

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSCe4W50iP0&feature=related

    Reply
  49. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:23 am

    http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true&mediaKey=8a21037d-5c76-4299-9b72-bdbb1a25a9da@Keane:

    Reply
  50. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    @Kate:
    True enough…we have to remember that stills only capture a nano second of a scene.

    But still.

    It’s sure fun to speculate if they are doing the full court press of “See??? We’re alright. We’re still together.”

    Reply
  51. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:26 am

    @TobyKat:
    I think this video is from last year.

    Reply
  52. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    @stinky-inky:

    it is a old one with clint eastwood

    Reply
  53. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    @ omgwtflol – Ian never said that she had a restraining order out against Brad, he said she was trying to get one. I very much doubt she would have had any grounds for it seeing as the violence in their relationship (if any) sounds more like it was coming from her than him. I would guess it was just another one of her little ploys or tactics to try to fuck with his head and gain the upper hand and keep him away from their kids. Obviously it didn’t work out.

    Re: that kiss. I think it was probably just someone saying goodbye to someone else after a night of dinner nad drinking. I’m guessing they have to behave in a cordial way when they’re at a dinner for the film Brad is promoting. People put on shows that everything is alright between them in public all the time, even when they’re divorcing. A poster commented to the effect that she did it for many months with her then husband even though they were going through a divorce. If you’re out for a meal with 60 other people in the industry, the likelihood is you’re going to try to act like everything is ok. That’s a lot of people who could tell a lot of other people who could tell a lot of other people (including Ian for one!) if it wasn’t. JMO

    Reply
  54. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    I hope so because she’s very pregnant……@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  55. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @sama:
    SORRY guys wrong video!

    Reply
  56. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @TobyKat:

    It looked like he was thinking “would you just let me eat” when she grabbed his hand. Two other things:

    1) When they showed that Clint Eastwood was sitting on the other side of AJ, am I the only one who wondered how much time her right hand spent on Clint’s thigh?

    2) Did anyone else think when she was getting in the car that she was arching her back to make herself look pregnant??

    Reply
  57. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    In the Hague photos, Angie was wearing a close fitting black suit, no bump, but she arrives in Canne and suddenly it’s back to the black “i may be preggers” moo-moo. The dinner they attended was for 60 people, the entire cast and crew of the I.B. movie, so this “private” moment was anything BUT private. Just another photo op for Angie imo.
    Also, the url i posted for the Ann Curry interview came from TMZ and didn’t include the earlier parts the MSNBC url did…@CC:

    Reply
  58. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @Keane:
    I KNOW!!! He looked like he was dying!!! Ann Curry is one of the reasons I stopped watching the Today show.

    She has this totally OBNOXIOUS way of interviewing people. She does this husky, I’m so sincere, voice that just makes me wanna jump outta my skin!! It’s so aggravating.

    I don’t know, it’s hard to explain but she has a way of going over the top with her “concern” voice in interviews that drives me nutso! Or more nutso than I already am!!! LOL!

    Reply
  59. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    @topbrit:
    Laughing out loud at you TopBrit :-)

    Reply
  60. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    @TobyKat:

    OK, that makes a LOT more sense, especially since she was not looking preggo at all in the photo from the Hague yesterday!

    Reply
  61. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    @Kate:
    Right. It didn’t look like a kiss between two people in love. She’s really holding on for dear life, though.

    @Keane:
    I think Ann and Brad probably have that type of confidence between them. A professional confidence where she knows him well enough to do that (grab his face). It was kinda motherly of her.

    Reply
  62. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:34 am

    I noticed that she looked directly into the “hidden” camera immediately before she began stroking Brad’s arm, then up to his hand and finally stroking his face…..photo op definately@TobyKat:

    Reply
  63. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:35 am

    @CC:
    I’ve disliked her since she totally ruined what would have been a great PR moment for one of my clients.

    Reply
  64. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    @stinky-inky:
    Oooooooo, do tell!!!!!! ;-)

    Reply
  65. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    @stinky-inky:

    Dish? Please tell us…at least what she did if not to whom she did it!!!!

    Reply
  66. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    does anyone know what the “flinstone style” is referring to?

    Reply
  67. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    @ too curious
    @ cc – yeah agree with you both,detract! detract! detract! is in overdrive.the trial of child soldiers,the ‘look i’m pregnant’ photo-op,the ‘woe is jolie’ in mags such as grazia (pitts pr is behind on points in ‘who is the villian’ btw) must be some bad shit that is about to hit the fan.a poster on the other thread made me laugh so hard with this comment:

    backalleyknees said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    @ceegee:
    “After watching the proceedings from the viewing booth, I stood up and found Thomas Lubanga Dyilo looking at me,” Jolie said. “I imagined how difficult it must be for all the brave young children who have come to testify against him.”

    Hello Narcissist! “He was looking at me”?

    STFU Angie Jo! Obviously he was looking at you my dear because you are God’s avenging angel come to slaughter all the evil of the world. (sarcastic rant over)
    HILARIOUS

    Reply
  68. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:38 am

    @stinky-inky:

    I’m sending you virtual Groucho glasses and a wig so you can disguise yourself. Type in a whisper and no one will know who you are :)

    Reply
  69. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:39 am

    Back to the foot fetish thing….Maybe QT likes reptilian looking limbs and if that’s the case, then he must turn inside out when he gets to see Paris Hilton’s hideous flappers…

    Reply
  70. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:39 am

    @sinker:

    Good point, I wondered that meant when I first saw it then got distracted…

    Reply
  71. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:39 am

    @sinker:
    I think it’s referring to feet. Have you seen The Flintstone’s feet? They do everything barefoot.

    Reply
  72. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:42 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:

    Duh! Ok, so I overlooked the obvious!

    Reply
  73. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:42 am

    @ TobyKat – wow that was hilarious, thanks for posting that, that is the master of PR manipulation in close-up action! It was hilarious how she began by holding his hand semi-naturally and then started to paw him in an upwards direction, trying to reach his face which couldn’t have looked more forced. Then she signalled her knowledge that the paps were there by looking directly at the camera and asking them to stop filming. It was like, there you go, you have your shot now, now stop taking my picture. Hilarious! Poor Brad looked like a deer caught in the headlights as usual – hilarious!

    @ CC – yes I do not know this woman being a Brit but she – like so many female TV presenters – comes over as unbelievably fake. It was like she was acting a persona to me, not being real at all. Unless she was just so overcome by ardour for Brad she went into little girl flirt mode. Having worked with a few presenters I can say that quite often their on screen persona is nothing at all like how they are in real life. They are literally acting a certain character when they do all their presenting/interviewing. I don’t know how they keep it up myself it must be exhausting! Ange is an old pro though. All opportunities are publicity opportunities it seems!

    Reply
  74. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:45 am

    @topbrit:
    I too thought that was a totally narcissistic(sp?) thing for her to say. As if he cares that she’s there? And in the photo of her looking so concerned…like “the thinker”…..it makes me wanna slap her!!!!!! It’s like she truly thinks that pose and her statement make her so terribly deep and important. What a joke.

    Reply
  75. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:46 am

    Once a vocal proponent of celluloid-over-digital film-making, Tarantino got his first experience with the latter technology by directing a segment of the film Sin City (2005) with his friend ‘Robert Rodriguez’ (I) . Rodriguez, who lauds the technology at every opportunity, made it his mission to convert Tarantino as well. At the end of shooting, Tarantino is reported to have said simply, “Mission accomplished.” i think this is what Flintstone Style is refering to….Also Angie would fit his criteria perfectly “Frequently has a female character who wears a black and white pant suit (Uma Thurman in Pulp Fiction (1994), Pam Grier in Jackie Brown (1997), Daryl Hannah in Kill Bill: Vol. 2″ as well as “Extreme violence, much of which is off-screen in his films” See complete bio here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/bio (2004)).@sinker:

    Reply
  76. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:48 am

    @Keane:
    It would be a good laugh for you to google some of Ann’s interviews to see what I’m talking about. It’s no wonder she’s never gone further than a correspondent for the Today show. She’s insincere and it profoundly shows itself during each interview.

    Reply
  77. I'm on the bidet said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    Let’s see then, what movies can Tarantino re-make to combine Angie’s feet with his interest in war movies?

    * A Bridge Toe Far
    * Das Feet
    * Feet from Iwo Jima
    * Full Metal Jacket, Low Cut Heel
    * Apocalypse Shoe
    * Schindler’s List of Things He Likes About Feet
    * Flags of our Fathers, Toes of Our Mothers

    The scripts practically write themselves. Plus, you could have foot-shaped food sold at Burger King as a cross-promotion!

    Really though, the thought of Tarantino working his foot fetish has really put me off my lunch . . .

    Reply
  78. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    @ ladybert – thanks sweetheart
    @ et al – so she isn’t preggers is she,was it wrong vid

    Reply
  79. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    @ topbrit – yes we were all aghast at that, it was a totally priceless quote! We can all store that one up to use at our leisure as fodder for satire in the future I reckon. “Oh I was there when the first black President of the United States was elected and he looked at me and whispered ‘I could never have achieved this without you Angie, the whole of the African-American race and I owe this achievement entirely to you. P.S. How’s about a blow-job in the car park after? Willy C says you give great head.’” Or even “Yes when Mahatma Gandhi led the way to India’s independence from colonial rule through the medium of non-violent protest, he turned to the adoring crowd and said this may be a great achievement for the people of India, but it is nothing in comparison to what a great, as yet unborn, woman by the name of Angelina Jolie will achieve for the planet in the future. Let’s all forget this freedom from colonial rule crap, let’s all give thanks that one day the planet will be blessed with a woman so incredible, totally non-selfserving and above all HAWT as Angelina Jolie some day. I believe the key year will be 1975 (debatable, she will look much older but that’s what the future invention of plastic surgery is for after all), put it in your diaries folks, it will outshine this day in an instant! Yours, Mahatma.” Or words to that effect.

    Reply
  80. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    @TobyKat:
    Did you notice at the end of the video, Mick Jagger is behind Clint Eastwood??? How bizarre is that if he really did take AJ’s virginity as hinted at during a previous post?

    Reply
  81. omgwtflol said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    @Keane: Thanks for trying to explain Keane. I honestly can’t keep up with what is “fact” from Ian, what is supposition / allegations from a source or what is deduced from the posters here.

    Reply
  82. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    I’m surprised that she didn’t manage to wangle her way into the next QT movie during the filming of IB.

    Reply
  83. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    @ CC – yes its the insincerity that shines through isn’t it? Sadly some of the most successful, highest paid female presenters on TV in the UK are terribly insincere but everyone seems to have been duped into thinking what nice ladies they are. Its something that a lot of people who work with them would highly dispute I would imagine!

    Reply
  84. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Kate, this is for you from Lainey LOL. Can you stand it?:

    Pitt Tenderness

    After a visit to The Hague, the Jolie arrived in Cannes yesterday to join Brad for dinner with the Inglourious Basterds team debunking yet again tabloid reports of a split or a meltdown. My sources say it’ll be a quick trip for Angelina. She’s taken 2 days off shooting, will join Brad on the carpet tonight, then goes back to New York to resume work while he stays here for press Thursday and Friday before returning home for1 the weekend.

    He was overhead telling someone today at the palais actually that he “promised his kids Saturday morning”.

    Inside the restaurant during dinner: barely any makeup but her skin was glowing. She’s thin, not her thinnest, but she’s thin. Am told Angie seemed tired, at one point leaning her head against his shoulder as he stroked her back. She had a glace of wine, he beer, and towards the end she looked up at him and he rubbed her cheek with his thumb, like ok baby let’s put you to bed now.

    Oh la.

    The porn.

    It’s coming.

    The hand on the ass is coming tonight. For sure.

    Can you stand it?

    http://www.laineygossip.com/Brad_Pitt_and_Angelina_Jolie_have_dinner_in_Antibes_night_before_Inglourious_Basterds_premiere_in_Ca.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0

    Here’s another gem for you:

    Pitt Porn teaser!

    Tonight they’ll do it full on carpet style. But last night a little more private.

    Radaronline has just secured these photos of the Brange kissing last night. Cannes obviously gives them an added little juice.

    Couple of years ago the same thing happened. They got into the back of a car and went at it right away, remember? So. F-cking. Hot. Quiver….although I love the one with Brad peeking to make sure the cameras are around. Remember, they may be solid and together, but they still have to protect their brand. I buy.

    Click here for more photos.

    Best part is that the tabloids have released their new covers: Star Magazine’s latest bullsh-t is that Angie “walked in” on Brad and Jen. In Touch is continuing to claim that Brad is texting Jen.

    Please.

    Who the f-ck would leave Angelina Jolie to go back to Jennifer Aniston?

    http://www.laineygossip.com/Brad_Pitt_and_Angelina_Jolie_kissing_in_Cannes_2009.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0

    I can’t believe I ever read her.

    Reply
  85. Gitano said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Angelina has ugly monkey toes. Nothing sensual or sexual there. QT is a very sick man if this is true.

    Reply
  86. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    when comparing uma thurman to skanky does qt not realise there is no comparison,uma has more talent in her big, gorgeous, erotic, fetishy toe than skank could ever hope to suck on lol

    Reply
  87. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Does anyone know what time IB will premier tonight?? Don’t know what time it is in France right now….It’s almost 1:00pm on the US East Coast…

    Reply
  88. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    @topbrit:
    OH MY GOD!!!!!!!! THAT WAS HILARIOUS!!!!!

    Reply
  89. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    @ keane – hahaha you crack me up mate -another classic from the ‘keanster’ just off topic have you any opinions on why fern britton is leaving this morning and does she really dislike schofield?

    Reply
  90. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    @ omgwtflol – that’s ok, I don’t think it was ever presented as solid fact anyway, more that he’d heard that she was trying to get a restraining order out on him. How successful she was with that or how much effort she put into it, who knows? I can just see it being one of hundreds and hundreds of ploys and tactics she used to try to gain control of the situation. I expect the next day she was instructing her lawyer to do something else.

    @ All – Oh and that reminds me, doesn’t that video footage really look to you like a woman on the verge of suicide? She looks about to break in two right? Yeah it does to me too (eyeroll). She actually looks as happy as larry with a dog with two dicks to me. Oh God I Just realised how appropriate that analogy was then, Lord strike me down for my dirty mind!

    Reply
  91. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    @sinker:
    maybe he’ll hit her over her head and drag her back to his man-cave?

    Reply
  92. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    @ cc why thank you sweetheart.btw love your avator cos i love cats,gotta balance it out with all the doggie lovers on here(no offence ange

    Reply
  93. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    Another movie? You are such a fraud AJ!

    I hope he does hit her over the head with a club and takes her to a cave in Afghanistan where they can toe-fetish sexy times. *shudder*

    Reply
  94. LurkeyLoo said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    The kiss pictures remind me of the “last vacation” shots of him and Jen…he seems very disconnected.

    Reply
  95. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    @ topbrit – annoyingly I know someone who works on that show but she has kind of gone awol on me recently so I’m not in a position to find out. From what I hear Fern isn’t exactly what she says on the tin either. I’ve heard she’s much more of a diva and much less down-to-earth than people think. Hence the very awkward handling of the lap band controversy. Having said that when my friend first started working on the show she said they went for lunch with the presenters after every show and never said anything about them not being nice, so maybe that is exaggerated. But as I said before, people, especially women, are usually at least a bit different to how they come across on TV.

    The reason she is leaving is down to money though. He is reported to earn 4 times as much as her and she didn’t find that out until recently (I do genuinely think that’s dreadful because she’s as popular and as vital to the success of the show as him, however he has obviously had a much longer, more successful career than her so perhaps commands a higher fee), plus ITV have given him prime-time vehicles like Dancing on Ice and are developing his career more. Apart from Mr and Mrs she hasn’t been given anything else. The ITV bosses were also furious about the show being dragged in to the whole lap band debacle, so it wouldn’t surprise me that some bad feeling has lingered after that. It is not always a nice business TV and its horrendous when you’re working for people who aren’t being nice to you or who are out to get you. So I would say her leaving is probably a combination of that and the money. I think they will struggle to fill her spot though.

    Reply
  96. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    @topbrit:
    Ha! That’s my baby girl, Lucey. She’s ten but I still see her as a kitten. At this stage, she’s my only “child” but my hubby and I are currently trying for the human kind…;-)

    Reply
  97. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    I don’t think by the way that he is in rehab because he was drinking in the middle of the day at the press conference…..

    Reply
  98. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    AFM, i believe you are correct. Ann Curry has had Several exclusive interviews with Brad Pitt and Angelina jolie over the years. She was the only journalist AJ gave an interview with while she was in Namibia (pregnant with Shiloh) doing some of her “charity’ work. Ann always seems to be able to get an interview with Brad

    Reply
  99. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    @TobyKat:
    I think that video is from last year since the comments go back months.

    Reply
  100. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    According to Lainey on Twitter Angie is wearing Pink!!

    Reply
  101. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    @LurkeyLoo:
    Yeah, those last vacation shots kinda broke my heart. Jen was such a bad cryer on Friends that when I saw pictures of her ACTUALLY crying, I felt like I was spying or eavesdropping on something that was none of my business. It was really a tough series of photos to look at because Jen looked so devastated. The kissing ones?? Not so much. Those bring me tears of joy because finally this Brangie Brand is coming to an end.

    Reply
  102. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    @TobyKat:
    She’s the only journalist they “trust” to show AJ in a good light. Diane Sawyer was once the chosen one but Ann put her patronizing voice to work and it struck a familiar chord with Angie…pretty pathetic that the only “journalist” in your court and willing to portray you in the light you want is Ann friggin Curry…

    Reply
  103. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    @sama:
    Could have been Perrier, it was definately something with bubbles. That said, I only saw the pix with the plastic cup, not any of what it was being poured out of. I have a hard time imagining the French serving champagne in a plastic cup though, especially at Cannes.

    Reply
  104. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    @sama:
    He could be slowing down the drinking. I went through a similar period where I would drink a whole lot due to some personal issues. I was kinda masking and avoiding things by drinking. I wasn’t a full-blown alcoholic, but had I continued on that path then the alcoholic label would have been plastered over my forehead. I didn’t completely quit drinking, but slowed down a whole lot. Now instead of drinking to get over rough patches, I just talk. And the drinking is just a social thing, not a form of therapy.

    Reply
  105. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    Lainey to be on CNN at the bottom of the hour……

    Reply
  106. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @well:
    Yes it is. But, even back then look at how she whores for the camera. She strokes his arm, carreses his hand then oh so tenderly touches his face. But from him, nothing. No affection. He knows the cameras are rolling but unlike AJ he doesn’t put on a show. Even back then he seems disconnected.

    Reply
  107. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @Canuck:

    At the pressconference he had a champagne glass not a plastic cup, he was drinking
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/brad-drinking-at-press-conference-t225310.html

    Reply
  108. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @ cc – my upmost bestest wishes and success to you both with that,best thing you will ever achieve and enjoy the practice! gotta go by to everyone.carry on with the goss and info guys
    @ keane – thanks for that,yeah i read something about fern along those lines but i still prefer her to him,can’t stand him and i think he is up his own arse as we brits say.cya later

    Reply
  109. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @everybody: BTW, I left this message for you guys on the Carla Bruni thread. It’s about the Chelsea Lately link you guys wanted to see. Here is the original message:

    Angie’s Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    Good morning everybodeee!! To all those who were hoping to catch Chelsea Lately the other night ragging on Brangie, It’s on YouTube now. Here’s the link (part 2):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWZ1iQdf5Gw

    And Part 1 of that is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWZ1iQdf5Gw

    Reply
  110. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @Canuck:
    It was Pierre…

    Reply
  111. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    Why are some of my comments lost in cyberspace? So annoying.

    Reply
  112. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    @sama:
    I stand corrected! At the beginning of the video, they are all opening up their Pierrer water bottles but I didn’t finish watching it. Good catch!

    Reply
  113. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    @TobyKat:
    And not to always drag Jen into it, but I seem to remember lots of candids of them being very affectionate. He was always holding onto her and they seemed so very connected to one another. I truly was shocked when they separated simply because all the pap candids of them showed an affectionate couple. Seemed odd. And I too have noticed that since the beginning of Brangie, he isn’t as affectionate to AJ as she is to him…

    Reply
  114. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    Exactly what i thought when i saw that series of shots too! Absolutely disconnected.@LurkeyLoo:

    Reply
  115. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    every picture of them exiting the restaurant, AJ is staring directly into the cameras. Everyone else is minding their own business and getting ready to go, but she is AGAIN, seducing the cameras.

    Reply
  116. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    @Keane:

    Hahaha, Keane you are in fine form today!

    Oh, to make sure I won’t be considered a phony by some troll, I admit that in reality I honest-to-goodness laugh heeheehee! Pretty pathetic when a 5 year asks, why do you go heeheehee when you laugh? I am also part of a charming minority who laugh but have nevered scream on a roller coaster :)

    Reply
  117. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    It’s almost like she’s looking directly into my soul!!! LOL!!

    LIKE MEDUSA….DON’T LOOK AT HER!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  118. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    pictures from the red carpet
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/offical-breakup-brangelina-thread-they-have-arrived-pic-t225229-75.html

    Reply
  119. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    Pics on JJ at the premier!! http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/05/20/brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-inglorious-basterds-cannes-premiere

    Reply
  120. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    @sama:
    Two great minds thinking alike!! LOL

    Reply
  121. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    @CC:
    Which video? The link is for photos…

    Reply
  122. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    look at those pictures (my personal opinion if don’t think aj looks good)
    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/premiere-of-basterds-t225317.html

    Reply
  123. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    I think she looks terrible, and I hate the dress……..

    Reply
  124. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    I hate her dress in the back…the side…all of it…and that red lipstick is WAY too harsh for her. But I do love the Oscar winning “we’re so happy” face to face pose!! HA HA!

    Reply
  125. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1184692/Brad-Pitt-Angelina-Jolie-reunite-red-carpet-appearance–flying-separately.html

    The Brand on the red carpet in Cannes.

    Reply
  126. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    @CC:
    LOL!! She’s probably trying to steal your soul.

    Reply
  127. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    @Kikumon:
    well, the evil Ms. Jolie truly looks like the slut she is – an incredibly ugly dress.

    Reply
  128. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    @Canuck:
    On some website, maybe the Cannes Festival website (not sure) there is a video of cast and director for IB at the press conference….Sorry, been on a few websites today and can’t remember exactly where I saw it. Perhaps it was the Canne’s website….

    Reply
  129. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/87872068.jpg?v=1&c=NewsMaker&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19375C05EF07E24E8D674539E90E2F1319549AAE4E13EDE9114 In some of the series of Red Carpet photos, i think i DO see a “bump”…..Damn, i hope not!

    Reply
  130. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    I KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!!!

    Reply
  131. Caribsmom said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    @CC:IB is supposed to present at 7:30 their time. For me, Im in Central time that would be 1:30. IF France is on the same time zone as the UK and Im pretty sure it is.

    Reply
  132. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    @sama:

    Jolie looks odd. Don’t know that I would call that dress pink, looks kind of a barfy light brown to me. Not a flattering color for a wax mannequin to be dressed in, IMO.

    Is Diane Kruger the one in white in the first photo? Her dress is absolutely gorgeous.

    Reply
  133. Caribsmom said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    @topbrit:I love cats too! I have one named Kady, shes my baby. We now have two dogs and a cat! haha

    Reply
  134. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    @ladybert62:
    And from that picture, hapless Mr. Pitt looks like he is dragging her down the carpet – “You will walk down this red carpet with me or I will kill you here and now!” Wow – neither one is even pretending to smile. For all that dress hides, she might as well be naked. :-)

    Reply
  135. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    @Patty anne:
    I was thinking the exact same thing. And I gasped. Maybe its drugs bloat?

    Reply
  136. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Jolie looks old, and very tired, and as if she’s wearing a nightgown. Brad looks uncomfortible standing with her. You can see her holding tightly on to Brad, but he seems to have a loose grip on her, in one shot, he even has his pinkey elevated….lol@too curious:

    Reply
  137. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    Yup, she looks horrible…….Jen must have recommended that dress to Brad…@ladybert62:

    Reply
  138. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    @Patty anne:

    I don’t think so, remember her black suite from the Hague photos yesterday? TUmmy looked pretty flat. Think what you see if the not really flattering drape of the fabric in that shot.

    Reply
  139. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    @TobyKat:
    True dat. True dat.

    Reply
  140. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    @TobyKat:
    Did you notice, she keeps looking to the window (paps) and begins stroking his hand over and over and he’s not moving, holding form… but then she begins to stroke his face and he grabs her hand to stop her?

    BP’s growin’ a set right before our eyes, folks.

    Reply
  141. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Where are you guys seeing this????

    Reply
  142. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Don’t know, but i do know victims of starvation tend to bloat badly. Perhaps with her excessive weight loss recently she is in fact starving herself by filling up on drugs? She seems to have landed in the land of pleanty of druggy friends (NYC) I also noticed her hair is fading in color, and her hairline is recessing rapidly. She looks OLD!@backalleyknees:

    Reply
  143. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    The group shot with Bradley, Diane, some other guy, Brad looks less than thrilled. He’s just going through the motions. I’m sure he is worn the eff out. The good thing about a movie role is once you’re done, you’re done…hopefully this farce will be done soon as well.

    Reply
  144. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    TV? Online?

    Reply
  145. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    It looks like she’s sticking her baby pouch out to me too….@Patty anne:

    Reply
  146. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    Click on the URL’s above where several have posted Red Carpet Canne photos @well:

    Reply
  147. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    BREAKING NEWS: Michael Jackson has postponed the first 4 of his 5 London concerts saying he doesn’t have enough time to prepare for them. I’m sure it has absolutely nothing to do with his failing health as Ian reported. That’s a man fully on top of his game if ever I saw one, ha ha!

    Reply
  148. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    IMO, if Jolie is indeed pregnant and not bloated like many anorexic are, then i must wonder who’s baby it is, as Brad seems unconcerned about it…. Too many NYC orgies?@Kikumon:

    Reply
  149. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    @Patty anne:
    I’m just surprised that her face doesn’t look more haggered. If she’s doing a lot of drugs, doesn’t that stuff start to come out your pores? Or is that mostly when someone abuses meth? anyone know?

    Reply
  150. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    True, he appears to be totally exhaused. I did read earlier in a report prior to the Red Carpet event, that Brad was not going to be long in Canne. Make his Red Carpet appearance and leave immediately after….we’ll see@backalleyknees:

    Reply
  151. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    Naw – its just the evil Ms. Jolie’s beer gut! :P

    Reply
  152. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    I think he’s still wondering about the last ones…..@Patty anne:

    Reply
  153. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    Very True, thank you for the reminder. I did mention earlier that the photo of her at the Hague wearing the black , form fitted suit didn’t show any bump at all….so it’s the many folds of her dress. Another reason it is a poor choice for the Red Carpet….trashy looking to me…..was this for QT’s benefit???@too curious:

    Reply
  154. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    And meet up with someone sweet and dear to him@Patty anne:

    Reply
  155. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    To me it just looks like the same level of smile and hand behind the waist as some of the photos from the press conference where he had his arm behind an actresses back,

    You know, even the Queen of England put her arm behind Michelle Obama’s back for a photo, so I don’t think a whole lot can be read into that. (And no, I don’t think either the Queen or First Lady commited a faux pas on that occasion. Can’t believe there is still a poll on Us magazine’s site about that).

    Reply
  156. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    @Peri:
    Thats funny! :-)

    Reply
  157. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    CC and Too Curious:
    I client of mine at the time was attending the Chocolate Show in NYC. They sell really delicious upscale, handmade chocolates–can’t really go into more detail than that. Phil Lempert had gathered up a bunch of interesting brands from the Chocolate Show and brought them to the Today Show to talk about chocolate trends. My client was included in the group, which I had nothing to do with, but was still delighted to see them on the show. Phil Lempert was talking about the healthful, antioxidant benefits of dark chocolate, which was just getting a lot of attention in the media at the time. Ann Curry kept going on and on about how chocolate makes you fat, you shouldn’t eat it, chocolate is no good, she wouldn’t try any of the samples. She was just being an overall whiny brat about the whole segment. She actually took up so much time complaining about chocolate that they didn’t get to talk about most the samples. I spoke to my client later about the segment, and they said it was so negative they were actually glad they weren’t mentioned by name. So what could have been a great opportunity for them was ruined, although they are doing fine without it. I didn’t get why she was even included in the segment if she had such a negative opinion about the subject. jmo.

    Reply
  158. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    @Keane:
    I agree Keane, Ann Curry is such an embarassment, she acts like she wants to bone him, I wonder why he keeps doing interviews with her, contract maybe, I was embarassed for her. such a fool. He was too nice to say, knock it off Ann..

    Reply
  159. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    .backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:38 pm .
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1184692/Brad-Pitt-Angelina-Jolie-reunite-red-carpet-appearance–flying-separately.html
    @well:

    Reply
  160. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    @sama:
    I’ve always read that one way to really see someone’s emotions in a photo is to cover the mouth and look at the eyes and nose. That way you can tell if the smile is fake. In the photos of these two kissing, his eyes look very sad and he never really seems to be looking into her eyes. It looks like he offers her his cheek.
    Another thing that is telling is that he can’t hide his expressions well—it appears he is seeing her for the first time in awhile.
    I wonder what she’s saying to him as this film set-up is going on?
    I’ll bet it’s angry.
    This is one case where the pics would be very different from the conversation.
    But Brad’s eyes! He is miserable looking at her. Miserable.

    Reply
  161. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    Ah, gotcha. I hate it that there is no news in America (hard news or soft) where things are presented as facts, not totally warped by the interviewer’s personal take on the subject.

    Reply
  162. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    Going through those photos was funny. In a couple of the “let’s gaze into each other’s eyes” he WASN’T looking at her. He was looking over her shoulder. His hand hardly makes contact on her back and bitch totally usurped JA’s pose of hand on stomach. What a cvnt! They look like they are arm wrestling while walking down the carpet. “You will hold my hand!!!”. And she looks awful. That dress isn’t helping her out at all. And her hairline is wonky.

    Reply
  163. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Brew of Souls?

    Reply
  164. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    @Patty anne:
    That photo is funny. He is dragging her down the red carpet.
    “Let’s get this thing over with”.
    He is really over her.

    Reply
  165. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    She and Madonna probably brew that stuff in drums…

    Reply
  166. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Cripes – that gown is a bit revealing hey, its slit to her snatch in the much loathed style of Brit ho-of-the-90’s Liz Hurley. Classy! Well they did their best to brush them up and make them look presntable for Cannes. She looks skeletal though and has a small belly, but I find it highly unlikely that a woman that thin and deathly looking would be fertile enough to be carrying a baby. I love how they are giving big fake smiles at each other but their hands are hovering over each other’s back, trying not to actually touch. Seems like they are only really happy at hand-holding these days, they can’t cope with getting any closer than that. In one of the photos Brad looks extremely old I must say, his face is so furrowed. I think these shots are going to come back to haunt them once the split is announced with a comment along the lines of look what a performance they gave on the red carpert only weeks/months before they split. It will prove how fraudulent the whole thing has always been for sure.

    Reply
  167. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    @pickwick:

    I did that with the Cannes red carpet photos and he does not appear to be really smiling and she looks like a zombie.

    Reply
  168. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    Indeed the photo where they are smiling at each other if you look to his eyes he isn’t looking into her eyes, very strange

    Reply
  169. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    I’m sorry that that was what happened to your people…..I noticed in her interview with BP that she was making it about her and not him…..Tacky and poor business manners…@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  170. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    She’s socially awkward and has no class. You’re right…why do a segment if you’re opposed to the topic at hand??????? Weird.

    Reply
  171. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Thanks Patty Anne.

    I think I’m having a melt down. A full blown, call my therapist get me some valium melt down. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK.

    Reply
  172. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    The pictures from the photocall where brad is in that cream suit? Bad Tom Ford. He looks old, fat and bloated. Jesus, his soul is being sucked out. Maybe AJ has sucked it dry because she’s looking rough as well.

    Reply
  173. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    @well:
    call your therapist sweetheart. You’ve worked too hard to get to this point. Do what you need to do.

    Reply
  174. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    Looks like he’s a million miles away. Always looking off into the distance. Now it could be he’s uncomfortable with the whole red carpet thingee and it’s not just her, or he knows the film is getting the reviews everyone hoped. He’s taking huge strides to get away from the situation.

    If one were on a 12-stepper and had to walk through situation after situation in which one had in the past been able to self-medicate, it seems like that would be a form of torture. jmo

    Reply
  175. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    meant is not getting the reviews

    Reply
  176. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    @ stinky-inky – what a twat, everyone loves chocolate, why on earth would you behave like that? She sounds like the type of woman I can’t bear, obsessed with her calorie intake and watching her figure. A day without chocolate is a day wasted to me! And besides, if you’re doing a segment on something you can’t stand there and slate the thing you’re talking about. Its as unprofessional as it is impolite. Hello Ann Curry, be enthusiastic, its the basic premise of presenting. You aren’t required to do an awful lot else after all! But it seems like “unprofessional” may be a recurring theme for her. Keep your hands off the talent in future Ann, Jesus!

    Reply
  177. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    Where are my comments?

    Anyway, she’s really sexing it up with this dress. Not so matronly. I like the color of this dress, but not sure about the cut etc. Reminds me of JLo and that green dress…

    Reply
  178. OMG said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    Robert Rodriguez idiots…@Keane:

    Reply
  179. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    @ladybert62:
    LadyB, I know you are on top of the necklace situation. Which one did Jen give him? The pink round/pipe cleaner looking one, or the chain one? Is there a medallion on the chain?

    Reply
  180. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Interesting comment under the first set of two picks next to each other
    “The look of love: Brad and Angelina made sure to appear the picture of happiness”

    appear being the operative word here!

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1184692/OK-start-party-Mr-Mrs-Glamour-arrived-Brad-Pitt-Angelina-Jolie-dazzle-Cannes-red-carpet.html

    Reply
  181. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    He’s never standing exactly next to her and there is at least a foot between them at all times.

    If we had any doubts at all—the people posting here are really astute. This guy is soooo over her. He can’t bear to be with her. He doesn’t like to touch her or look at her.

    She does look pregnant, but that could be just a way to garner some sympathy and speculation.
    If she is pregnant, Brad certainly is acting as though he knows it isn’t his. He was always very tender toward her when she was pregnant, and he seems to be that type of guy.

    That little side trip to the Hague worked it’s magic—people on other sites are going bonkers over how amazing and caring she is.

    I’m not completely going with the QT thing—I think it’s true, but I don’t think that’s the reason she’s there. I don’t think she would have gone, but Brad made her. I think, looking at these photos, he does have something on her and can make her show stop work on a movie and fly around the world to show up at his event fo his publicity

    Reply
  182. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Could the slit up her dress go any higher?

    Reply
  183. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    @Keane:
    “A day without chocolate is a day wasted to me!” Exactly!

    Thanks for understanding, everyone!

    Reply
  184. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    @too curious:
    Or maybe she is high. Her eyes look glazed over like they did on the set of Salt in this picture:

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photoitemfull.php?yr=2009&mon=04&evt=maddox-gangsta&pic=maddox-jolie-pitt-gangsta-04a.jpg

    Reply
  185. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @too curious:
    She’s puffy. I’ve never seen her look like this. She doesn’t even look like herself.
    What could cause that? She doesn’t look healthy. Her face is bloated, but yet she’s skinny. Her face and her tummy.

    Reply
  186. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @CC:
    The only time I’ve ever seen eyes like that, I was with people using drugs. Glassy, vacant.
    Of course, I’m sure she is just tired from filming. (*)

    Reply
  187. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @ well – maybe now would be a good time to go public with your story, seeing as seeing Ange at Cannes makes you feel so angry?

    Reply
  188. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    @well:

    (((((Well))))) Sweetie, is there anything we can do to help? If not, please call your therapist stat!

    Ok, everybody concentrate, who thinks they can make a pink-hex-warding-off necklace and get it to Well? ladyb isn’t that your area??? (Just trying to lighten things up a little.)

    Reply
  189. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    @pickwick:
    She looks pregnant to me too, in the pics where she is standing sideways next to him and the dress is slit up to her snatch she looks about 3-4 months, of course that could e a padding. She does not look all that thin to me, she looks pretty good for all the crap we are hearing, and Brad looks just like he did in the pics last year at Cannes to me, not a bit different. same ole look. He did look good in the interview.

    She looks trashy in that dress though, and after wearing all those matronly dresses to the SAG and Oscar events maybe this is her coming out party lol. “I am back on the market” She looks smug to me. Not sad, not clingy at all. Like they are putting on a show, and the articles seem to be reflecting that.

    @keane – I agree, makes them look like the biggest frauds and liars to do this when everyone knows they are done, they may survive it if he does not put his hand up her dress or on her ass, then he can say, “well I had on Jen’s necklace and wore her scarf” lol and “I was just doing my job” lol

    Looks like the same scarf Jen has been wearing to me. I know that sounds like a broken record, but that scarf is just so out of place, the color does not match, it is screaming “look at me” like he wants people to wonder about it.

    JMO

    The other video everyone keeps talking about where she is stuffing food in her mouth with Clint and Mick, that is from last year at Cannes when she was pregnant.

    Reply
  190. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @too curious:
    I know! It’s really telling. Most people can’t keep their eyes from showing how they feel. They can add the smile.
    When you do that with these two—it’s just obvious.
    And, yes, she does look like a zombie. No expression at all. Blank. Her eyes are blank and her face is puffy. She looks really weird.
    And somebody mentioned her hair color being faded—I would agree with that.
    I think without makeup and Brad Pitt on her arm she would be hard to recognize.

    Reply
  191. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    Would it even count as a day if chocolate weren’t involved???

    Reply
  192. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @pickwick:
    Yeah, you’re right. She’s looked way better than this particular outing…and the tatoos…no offense to anyone on here who has tats but hers make her scuzzy looking. They’re like jail tats or something. IMO, they just look dirty and distracting. I like tats with color so hers are not appealing to me.

    Reply
  193. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    @pickwick:
    Wink-wink, nudge-nudge! ;-)

    Reply
  194. GUEST said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I actually like the dress, but not on her, and not combined with this lipstick.

    Reply
  195. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    @pickwick:
    If one drinks a lot and doesn’t eat, one can get that puffy look–especially women of a certain age can get that bloated stomach. I used to see it a lot with middle-aged women in restaurants who would drink like fish and barely touch their food.

    Reply
  196. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Kate:

    Kate and/or Well, someone posted on the CB/AJ post that Jen is taking a few days off from filming The Baster due to exhaustion from her filming/promotion schedules. Have you heard anything about this? Is it health/drug related or does she just want to be out of sight for a few days so people won’t be posting new pics of her next to AJ & BP on the red carpet???

    Reply
  197. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Kate:
    Her stomach would be a normal stomach for a non-HW mom with three babies. So…is she just letting it all hang out—kind of not giving a crap?
    If she is pregnant and the baby isn’t Brad’s, that will be quite an uproar a few months down the road.
    She has some weight, but it looks like water weight.
    Also, she looks scary-skinny at the Hague and then bloated and wearing a dress that exaggerates her big tummy a day later.

    Reply
  198. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    AJ her red lipstick and hair to her side, i think she copying british actress rachel wei.. i can’t remember her last name. i love her movie mummy 1. yes, i think BP just not that into her. he looks space out and his force smile was so obvious.

    Reply
  199. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @pickwick:
    Re: her side trip to the Hague. You’re right, everyone is commenting on it. All other publications are slipping it in as well. Something like this: “Angelina flew into Cannes yesterday after attending a war crimes trial in the Hague. It seems that she was able to work with the producers on her new movie Salt, to be given a short amount of time off to support her partner and bring attention to the world’s smallest victims.” barf.

    ANd the interview “Angie’s been working and I’ve been with the kids…” No you haven’t. You’ve been on the west coast you a-hole. You haven’t been anywhere near the kids after that photo op with your parents. Oh, right, you took the boys to a movie, but the rest of the time?

    Reply
  200. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @GUEST:
    The lipstick is a BAD color for her.
    And it is all wrong with the dress, which doesn’t fit her very well.

    Reply
  201. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    I think it’s caused by the vacuum from her Va-Ja-Ja…..lolol She seems to be able to suck most anything into that Black Hole@liuno:

    Reply
  202. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @GUEST:

    Good point. On someone who had a bit of color in their complexion this could be a great dress…maybe Penelope Cruz could pull it off? Not AJ, though, and the lipstick is just to draw attention to those freaky lips of hers.

    Reply
  203. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    I know. Where are those kids they say they want to spend so much time with–and have all the money in the world to buy that time.
    One place we know they’re not: school.

    Reply
  204. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @pickwick:
    Maybe she has been detoxing. You look worse before better.

    Reply
  205. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    I want to know what (or who) went down last night at their hotel. That’s where the goods are…SRRC do you have any idea?

    Reply
  206. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    The fawning comments over that trip to the Hague have run me off of other sites. People will believe anything. Propaganda works.
    Whoever thought up that little side trip earned their money, since the story was once again about saint angie and now about Brad’s Cannes trip and movie. It’s all about her.

    Reply
  207. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    What I think is interesting is that she looks so different from how she looked at the Hague…She has bloated fast from just a day or so……..I would bet drinking hard with some drugs would do it…JMO
    @pickwick:

    Reply
  208. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    I wonder if they are sharing space or staying in separate rooms?

    Reply
  209. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @pickwick:
    She looks bloated to me too. Either she ate really salty food last night, she’s about to have her period or she’s pregnant.

    Kate, if she is pregnant for the third time, she probably isn’t 3-4 months along. She would show much more, much earlier given that the muscles have been there and done that. At least in my experience, I showed much earlier the second time around. Of course I didn’t have a tummy tuck. She looks to me like no more than a typical pre-menstrual bloat.

    Reply
  210. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    As for her huge publicity stunt, aka, appearance at the Hague, if she was a decent mother of six, and had been gone from her babies for such a long time working on the film….and she finally got two days off….why is she in The Hague and not In The Home? with the kids? More of the Angie MeMeMe chyt

    Reply
  211. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @well:
    Direct your anger in a healthy manner.

    Reply
  212. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    Reports said they have a cottage behind the hotel…i’m sure it’s large enough where they don’t have to run into one another if they so wish@CC:

    Reply
  213. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    @too curious:
    No, I have been traveling, I was hoping IAN had a blockbuster on that lol. I looked at those pics f AJ in the black suit in Amsterdam, she had on a satin blouse, and a tweed skirt, so it is hard to tell if her stomach is bloated or not because the pics do not show all the way down, or the ones I saw did not.

    It would not surprise me one bit if she pops up pregnant and tries to pass it off as his.

    Reply
  214. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Makes sense…

    Reply
  215. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, I think you’re right. These photos will be picked apart and come back to haunt them when this is officially announced. I’m sure there are writers WISHING they could pick them apart now.

    Reply
  216. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @Patty anne:
    I know. Wonder how long it’s been since she has seen those kids? Or Brad?
    She has all those small children—some are babies!—and when she gets a day off she spends in at a trial to help out her image.
    How can people not see through that kind of thing?

    Reply
  217. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Review In:
    The Basterds is an Armour-Plated Turket
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/may/20/cannes-film-festival-tarantino-inglourious-basterds
    Brad gives the worst performance of his career……
    No denying that he is stressed out by AngieJo…..

    Reply
  218. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    Thanks guys. I am not doing ‘well’ (the irony) right now. Seeing her standing beside him after everything she’s done makes me want to vomit and then throw something and kick someone’s ass. Someone’s ass in particular. It really makes me fucking sick and angry. And hurt.

    If I were to go public with my story, the last thing I need right now is for Keane and anyone else to start ripping me apart. I can’t handle it right now.

    I’m trying to take slow deep breaths, but I can’t make it through the tears. Fuck. Fuck.

    Reply
  219. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    There is a photo of the IB cast and QT and Angelina is in the photo. She is the only non-cast person in the photo. Speaks volumes, IMO.

    Reply
  220. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    @Kate:
    kate, i dont think she’s pregnant. i think its the way she stand makes her look pregnant. you know, push you tummy and breast out, your butt will look like JLO kind of thing…. its weird, coz i know we women sometimes hold our breath so our tummy looks flat… LOL…

    Reply
  221. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @Patty anne:
    That’s what I was thinking as well. They are probably in separate rooms. If they are taking off tonight then he won’t have to spend much time with her at all. This year is so different from last year.

    Reply
  222. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    Lainey-

    Who the f-ck would leave Angelina Jolie to go back to Jennifer Aniston?

    She is saying this because Star is reporting that Ang walked in on Brad and Jen, and In Touch is reporting that Brad is texting Jen. She is seliing her Pitt Porn.I can not take this bullshit. . I can not stand Lainey, she is going to give us a fucking blow by blow discription of how in love Brad is with this ho and how solid they are.

    I am going to throw up. I have to go until IAN posts something to make me feel better about this bullshit she is putting out. Did I say I hate Lainey. I love IAN. :)

    BBL

    Reply
  223. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    btw, I am not a fashionista at all, so my apologies if I am off about Penelope Cruz possibly looking good in this dress. PC is just so beautiful I think she would still stun in a flour sack…

    Reply
  224. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    @Keane:
    There’s another obvious one: Anyone could look at Michael Jackson’s frame and know something is terribly wrong with him. He was riding around in a wheelchair before Ian said he was sick!
    Someone has concocted this outlandish number of concerts to make more money off him or keep the banks still. I don’t know how anyone could doubt Ian about MJ.

    Reply
  225. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    That Michael Jackson comment was just my humble, uneducated opinion.

    Reply
  226. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    I think PC can wear anything. She’s gorgeous, and she’s supposed to be a really good person. I’ve never read an unkind thing about her.

    Reply
  227. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    @well:
    call your doctor. If it is that bad, shut down your computer and call someone you trust who can take care of you. Help yourself my dear, that’s the only power you really have.

    you probably won’t answer, but what you said about being hurt kind of piqued my interest. I won’t ask more, but I am very curious as to why you said that?

    Reply
  228. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    And totally off topic, but yesterday I kept seeing the snippet about Jessica Biel complaining she can’t get auditions because she’s too attractive…you know, she wants a career like that of Natalie Portman or Scarlett Johansson. WTF??????? I think NP & SJ are far better looking than Biel.

    Reply
  229. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @too curious:
    I would agree–the dress is too close to her flesh tone. A slightly darker complexion would rock it. And for stomach bloat, there’s always spanx. Giving her, and her stylist, the benefit of the doubt, I’ve seen enough red carpet fashion police shows to know that sometimes the dress looks amazing in person, but doesn’t photograph well.

    Reply
  230. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    AJ looks sloppy… http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/events_gallery2/image_full/173056/

    Reply
  231. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    Don’t like her either, but don’t think she’ll be able to spin this her way……The spark between these two people has gone……Everyone can see this…..@Kate:

    Reply
  232. jan said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    if this is her idea of sexy then i am sorry miss jolie this is down right slutty and skankie. that colour is not for her shallow skin and the lipstick does not match the dress, as for the hair please either cut it into a shorter style or buy a wig. as for the slit if you don’t have the legs please do’not show them rather show your boobs or something else. knobby knees do not look good with that dress and sorry but the tats at the back are totally classless. i think this is the worst i have ever seen this woman dressed even the fake leather pants was better. as for peewee he has no dress sense and since he has been with her he looks low class and pimpy, this film is not good according to the reviews and they state that he is deff not the star in this film some other actor stole the show. whether they stay together or not this is the worst train wreck of a soapie i have watch for the last 5 years and even beats the bold and the beastly. her tummy is most likely from the last pregnancy as she does no physical exercise. run jen run peewee is the last of the old has been pimps left in hw. jmo

    Reply
  233. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @well:
    Just keep in mind this is all no doubt a big show she and Brad are putting on. Brad, because it’s his film, AJ because she likes the attention. For fuck’s sake, they haven’t been photographed together (except for the staged shopping trips) since the Oscars. He’s been to the set once. Chill and all will be “well”.

    Reply
  234. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    I have to agree. Lainey appears to have a “hard on” for Angie. I’ve never read such a piece of fiction by a reporter in my life; “At dinner she rested her head on his shoulder and he massaged her tired back with his thumb”….in your dreams Lainey….That woman is seriously mentally ill imo…Give us some good stuff IAN….please?@Kate:

    Reply
  235. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @jan:
    agreed. It doens’t look like she really even cared to try. Way to phone it in!

    Reply
  236. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @Kate:
    Actually, that was one of my comments that got lost in cyberspace. I left you the whole article to read here. LOL. It’ll probably appear tomorrow ;) . Anyway, she’s so vapid… Lainey I mean.

    Reply
  237. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @well:
    two words: patience and karma.

    what goes around comes around.

    Reply
  238. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    As always, Michael over at dlisted has a great take on Saint Holina and Brad Shitt:

    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32141

    Reply
  239. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    @well:

    Well, if you would like I’ll be happy to give you an email address and you can let it all out that way if you need to.

    It really sucks knowing how horrible someone really is and then watching the world still kiss their ass, doesn’t it? Like they are untouchable. Karma will out but it sure seems to take its own sweet time…

    Reply
  240. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @TobyKat:
    AH, TobyKat – thanks SO much for that video! Yeah, her ’spidery’ fingers ALL over BP. Give me a break. P.S. Mick Jagger hiding behind a door frame – get over yourself. Very funny, tho.

    Listen, you guys, once again behind the 8 ball here, and I cannot possibly read all 200 plus posts, but am scanning here trying to keep up. Went into ‘Glosslip’ and it was SO funny – Dawn Olsen – was like WTF is Brad P. wearing – an ‘Ascot’. Yeah, saw that video with him talking to Ann, something, and I thought ‘ICK – what is that around his neck??? Yep, it’s an ‘Ascot’. Funny, but still trying to catch up w/ all you guys!!!

    Reply
  241. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    Do we have to be nice??? Aren’t we all just misogynists here anyway?? LOL

    Reply
  242. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @too curious:
    I second that too curious. If you need help well…let us know. NorCal isn’t that far from SoCal…

    Reply
  243. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    @CC:

    Stirring the pot – hasn’t Jen been wearing her hair a lot more tousled lately??? *evil cackle*

    Reply
  244. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    @too curious:
    I absolutely love Penelope. Did you watch Vicki Cristina Barcelona? She was good in that… smallish part, but very good. Good movie also.

    Reply
  245. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @sinker:

    http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/87872763.jpg?v=1&c=NewsMaker&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19375C05EF07E24E8D620FD489CCDC6A758284831B75F48EF45

    Reply
  246. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @too curious:
    LOL!!! True nuff…she wouldn’t want Jen to get all the tousled hair compliments, now would she??!! HA

    Reply
  247. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    Hello … my name is … er, uh … my name is …. TOGI (yeah, that’s it) … and I am a chocoholic.

    Reply
  248. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    @sinker:
    I think it’s a tad inappropriate of her….unless, it happened so quickly and she didn’t have time to excuse herself from the shot…oh God…I think I just defended her…..Oh God…

    Reply
  249. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @sinker:
    Diane Kruger looks glorious. And yes, AJ is the only “spouse” in the line-up, Joshua Jackson is standing up top to the right, waiting for his lady love to finish pictures in the spotlight so they can walk into the theater together. Now that couple has class.

    Reply
  250. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    That was a fabulous movie.

    Reply
  251. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @CC:

    LOL!

    You don’t understand. AJ is the center of the Universe, therefore of course she should be smack dab in the middle of a cast photo for a movie she is not in…

    Reply
  252. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    Haven’t seen, need to do so though, heard good things about her performance.

    Reply
  253. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @Canuck:
    I forgot to tell you that your hand fetish comment….up towards the top of the comments….was hilarious because I think her hands are the most frightening things on her body….next to her veiny arms….and huge head….and non-exsistent ear lobes….and those scrawny twigs called legs…never forgetting her soul stealing eyes…..Yeah, girlfriend is all sorts of odd parts and pieces!!!!!!!

    Reply
  254. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    @too curious:
    I totally agree with you there! Penelope could wear a paper bag and look beautiful! LOL I do think this is a beautiful dress … just not on AJ! I’m sure it would look incredible on ME! Cough, cough, sputter sputter. NOT.

    Reply
  255. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    @too curious:
    LOL it is really bizarre!!! ;-)

    Reply
  256. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    @Togi:
    It would look good on a blonde or someone very tan. AJ is too pale right now to wear it well. It’s just not a great color on her. And the style is too much. I don’t know. It may have been a boring color to some, but I did like her Golden Globe look from the year her mom died…the grey St. John dress…she did look very pretty on that red carpet….OH….MY….GOD….there I go again…..defending this freak!!! AGGGHHHHH!!!!

    I’m scared….seriously….. ;-)

    Reply
  257. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    @well:
    Don’t mean to pry, but, did you have some sort of personal (friends or lovers) relationship with Brad? Is it the fact that she’s with him that’s bothering you? Or is it just seeing her in general?

    Reply
  258. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    @CC:

    Don’t forget to live your life by the motto “what would Angelina do?” LOL where did someone see that posted – on one of the loon sites???

    I sw somewhere that Rosie refers to her as Agenda Jolie. LOL

    Reply
  259. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    @well:
    well: I don’t know if you have a personal realtionship with the Lord … even if you do not, just ask Him to come sit with you. He will be faithful if you ask. xxxxx

    Reply
  260. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    @too curious:
    Agenda Jolie….THAT IS PERFECT!!!! And the What Would Jesus Do bracelet company is now scrambling to put together the What Would Angelina Do bracelets, necklaces and anklets for the discerning Brangeloonie fan. HA HA HA HA HA

    Reply
  261. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @CC:
    No wonder QT is obsessing about AJ’s various body parts. Cartoon lips, cartoon boobs, cartoon bad ass attitude. And then the Italian cartoon “Corto Maltese”. Look at the hands:
    http://dardel.info/corto/Corto_lady.html

    Yeah, she wouldn’t stand a chance though if he was into hands. Unless it’s old lady man hands…

    Reply
  262. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @ backalleyknees and too curious – I would strongly advise against giving anyone on this blog your e-mail address after what has been going on, but particularly not “well” who I don’t think is legit. People were bothered enough about me to hack into mine through tracing my IP address, I would think very carefully before doing the same with yours.

    @ well – not sure why you had to bring me into it yet again. I asked a sensible question, if you are that angry right now I think the best thing would be to either go public with your alleged story or perhaps speak to a professional about it rather than seek solace on a gossip blog. Reading more and more about your supposed perpetrator can’t be healthy when you have been as damaged by them as you claim. Plus, as you said, you know they will be reading all about it. BTW I would like to point out that myself and other posters have never “ripped you apart”, merely calmly pointed out the massive holes in what you are saying. We don’t all agree on who you really are, but we do agree that it is not what you say. You say you have contacted Ian with your story, all you need to do now is give him some proof. You don’t have to agree to go ahead and go public, all you need to do is to confirm it to him in some way. I really don’t think it is fair to play on other commenters sympathy for your plight when you aren’t even prepared to do that.

    Reply
  263. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @CC:
    I agree, she did look great in that dress, very elegant for once. This dress is “look at me, I’m so hot” in a nasty sort of way. The colour isn’t nice, it is like looking at her naked, which I am sure is the whole point. Good thing Jen is ordering in chicken soon ;) You go girl!

    Reply
  264. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @CC:
    don’t feel bad. She used to be beautiful. She really did. Not so much anymore. Something happened after the twins. But drugging and detoxing don’t do wonders for the skin.

    Reply
  265. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    @too curious:
    Dang – I dont have the pink necklace handy as I just wrapped it around my bosses neck! Hope he chokes on it! (Ah, yes, bad day at work today ;-) )

    Reply
  266. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    @Keane:
    No worries keane, I won’t be giving out my email address. Some of the things {well} has said seem curious to me. That’s why I advised calling her doctor. I wanted to ask her about a couple of things, but she seems fragile (obviously well you will be reading this too) and that worries me a little. I was in and out of “intstitutions” for mental health (bi-polar, now under control) for years so stories like this always get my attention. I was wondering why she kept posting here if it was that upsetting, but having lost a friend to suicide…I just want to be careful.

    Reply
  267. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @ladybert62:
    ladyB did you see my question to you re: the necklaces?

    Reply
  268. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @well:
    Fuck what other people think or want to throw at you. You know you, take care of you.

    Reply
  269. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @Canuck:
    “old lady man hands” …. WWW HAAAA HAAA BAAA HAAA! That cracks me up! I am so easily amused. :-) And, I’m just soooooooo happy that we’re back on topics I can comment on!

    IMO, BP seems drained. Not so much in a “broken” way … just a “finished” way. He appears to resolved. His answers to Ann Curry’s stupid questions were sufficiently evasive, yet clear enough to suggest that AJ isn’t in his “future.” Kids? Certainly! They’re the most satisfying part of his life and he loves them. JMO

    Reply
  270. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @Keane:

    fyi, I have a separate email address I set up for emailing with posters from a totally different type of blog. I also changed any references on it to tie it to my real name, ,etc. but I guess that that doesn’t mean it would be impossible to find me (I did this based on your advice and your experiences, thanks for helping look out for all of us.)

    And I may be a sucker but I try to follow the Golden Rule in my life (except when it comes to AJ, then I am being a mirror reflecting her contempt for others right back at her). It just feels right to reach out to someone who is so distresses. Doesn’t mean that I am not wary of others Agendas.

    Reply
  271. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @sama:
    bb14. Some-one wanted to know on the other site if these were new pictures or old. She’s not pregnant is she.

    Reply
  272. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @too curious:
    oops, …THAT tie it to my real name…

    Reply
  273. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    I know. I struggle. Seriously. Like my husband has never thought she was beautiful. Instead, he thinks she is too much and almost alien looking. Big head, hands, feet, big lips, the eyes…all of it freaks him out and he literally shudders at some of her pix that I make him look at. LOL

    For me, I NEVER liked her personality…she always seemed too “I’m such a bad ass” that she was automatically repellent. I do admit, there are times when I look at her and I think, “My God, can anyone BE that gorgeous??” and then she opens her mouth and it’s over. And other times, I look at her and I think, “Ewww, scrawny, skeletal freak!!”…But it is totally obvious she’s had work so no…no one could be THAT gorgeous without help. Except for me…HA HA JK.

    Reply
  274. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Yes, hon … attorneys can do that to you! ;-) You need to keep a beating stick handy. Mosquito repellant works well too. My guy is a dog musher and lives with 40+ dogs. Fab guy, but I like to keep one of “them” dog whistles in my office so I can keep him at bay when I need to. Haaa haaa.

    Reply
  275. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    well, I think you have been “ripped apart” on this site. I hope you take care of yourself.

    Reply
  276. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @ backalleyknees – that’s good to hear, someone from FF posted on this site a while back with reference to my hacking experience that something similar had happened on there but worse where some posters gave their e-mail address to someone on there and their e-mails were hacked and things like photos of their kids published with threats etc. Again these people were anti-Brangelina. I obviously can’t confirm whether its true or not as that poster never came back here but it did chime with my experience. So just be careful with things like that, I didn’t realise it was best to use a fake e-mail address until my own experience. I have had a lot of experience with people with mental health problems too and have lost someone to suicide and I am sympathetic to people genuinely suffering from these conditions. I’m not sure you can trust that “well” really is though and I think it is unfair that she is playing on people’s sympathies when she has completely refused to prove what she is saying is true by giving Ian the evidence she claims she has. Plus I think commenting on a gossip blog about such sensitive things when you have said you know for a fact your persecutor is reading it sounds like the worst idea imaginable to me. If you are really that damaged by someone you would want to do your very best to stay away from them and not incite them to hurt you any more, its just common sense.

    Reply
  277. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @Canuck:

    Where was the bit with Jen eating chicken?? I keep seeing it being referred to but haven’t seen the story/clip.

    Reply
  278. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @jan:
    Yes that dress is a disaster and she looks slutty – the hairdo looks like it needs a good washing and a decent cut – the belly is certainly “puffy” looking. Can two people stand that close together and be t hat far apart – they are silently screaming: DO NOT TOUCH ME! They are soooo over. :-)

    Reply
  279. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @too curious:
    too curious: You’re awesome and perfectly reflect the attitude that helps make this world a better place! I am compelled to reach out as well, for different reasons. Same goal, however, and same result. Ya never know who might actually NEED an encouraging word at exactly that moment. Doesn’t matter if there are those who really don’t need it … because there are always those who do. And it’s not up to us to decide who we help. Amen.

    Reply
  280. CC said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    I have to run, everyone. I’ll check back in later!
    Take care,
    CC

    Reply
  281. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    @sinker:
    That is so tacky.

    Reply
  282. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Wearing dark lipstick makes your lips look smaller. When I want to do a severe look or am trying to hide when I am sick from a late night or allergies (shows in eyes), I go blood red lips and light eyes. I learned that trick years ago when I modelled. Also, wearing light colors like that make you look bigger. Comments made earlier about her stomach being the norm for a mom, I believe is dead on, not necessarily pregnant. I seriously doubt she could pregnant if she is as skinny in person as she looks. Women stop ovulating when their body fat % drops below a certain point. The problem is, she probably didn’t wear spanx, which smooths you out. We know she is not a super exercise freak. I would bet 95% of these women in these dresses wear this to create the smooth appearance.

    I wanted so bad to wear a beautiful long Hollywood style red dress ala Nicole Kidman’s red dress from Moulin Rouge when I got invited to a ball in Cairo. I found one in a South Beach boutique, but when trying it on, it made me look “pouchy” in my stomach because of the way it pulled to flare out in the back. I was really upset when the sales lady tells me to wear spanx. I told her I would feel fake and was really missing my younger skinnier self, dismayed that a dress would make me feel this way. Her, another woman in the boutique, and another sales lady giggled and told me not to feel bad, EVERYONE who does a red carpet wears that stuff and it is sold in most stores that sell long dresses.

    So now, when I buy a nice dress, or tight blouse, and just want smooth, I have a nice little collection of spanx. I am not fat either, I wear size 2 or 4, but some of the materials they use would literally show off a mole, so it’s great.

    Reply
  283. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @well:
    If if had the pink-hex necklace I would give it to you! Sorry for your pain and hope you can get through everything OK! :-)

    Reply
  284. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @too curious:
    Well, I’m trying to be fair. I guess. I don’t know.

    Reply
  285. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @topbrit:
    bb14. I looked at the stomach as well. But you go back and look at one of the photos taken in Hague she has her hands on her waist she doesn;t look pregnant there actually, she looks quite skinny. Do you think these photos are staged.? He doesn’t look interested and as you said he hasn’t got his arms around her it;s her that is doing the pulling., and looks like the cameras are nearby.

    Reply
  286. Unfuckingbelievable said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @omgwtflol:

    I totally agree!

    Reply
  287. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @ iluno – Not true at all, no-one has ripped well apart, we have talked to her and come to the conclusion that what she has said can’t possibly be true. If it could be true then I would have given it credence, but unless she has an awful lot of evidence to back-up what she says she could not possibly go public with it. (She said as “Me” that she was ready to “go to war” if necessary, does that sound like a shrinking violet to you? She sounded feisty as hell when she was writing under the name “Me”). And yet she is not prepared to give one shred of that evidence to Ian, even though she has e-mailed him to tell him her story. Does that not suggest something about the veracity of what she is saying to you? She told me that I do not realise what a “strong position” she is in with this, implying that she has an awful lot of evidence to go public with it, but she is not prepared to give a bit of it to the owner of the blog on which she is talking about it at great length. That is extremely, extremely suspect to me and I don’t trust her as a source one bit. That is not “ripping” someone apart in anyway. Simply presenting the facts as I see them.

    Reply
  288. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @another lurker:
    The snatch slit inthat dress would make it harder for her to wear spanx. But I hear you on the smoothing out thing! I didn’t know if I should cry or slap the sales lady when she told me to look into spanx and fake tanner when I was trying on brides maid dresses. But I have to say the spanx made the silk dress slide nicely and without any hangups. I now own three pairs.

    Reply
  289. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Keane:
    “I think it is unfair that she is playing on people’s sympathies when she has completely refused to prove what she is saying is true”

    It’s okay, Keane. Sympathy and caring is free. Doesn’t matter if we’re sympathetic and caring if there’s no reason to be. Doesn’t cost us anything personally, and can really help someone who needs it. Maybe “well” will talk to Ian some more. Maybe she won’t. I’m not convinced it really matters in the whole scheme of things. Quite frankly, I’m hear to read what IAN has to say and participate in the comment section. If it doesn’t come from IAN, or if it’s not confirmed by IAN, I consider it fluff. I’m pretty sure most people here would agree to that as well. xxxx

    Reply
  290. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Keane:
    Oh keane, I’m with too curious, I started a different email after your adventures on this site…

    Reply
  291. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    But THANK YOU for the advice!

    Reply
  292. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    Yes – I Did – sorry I couldnt respond sooner as I am having a bad day at work!

    Reply
  293. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    I was just being silly. I have seen photos where a celeb’s red carpet dress gets ragged on and then there is a better photo and it is fabulous. Same with those “who wore it better” things.

    Reply
  294. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    @ladybert62:
    good thoughts ladyb! You’re almost over the hump in hump day!

    Reply
  295. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    I personally like the dress and the color, but I couldn’t wear it on an everyday basis, but would wear it in leiu of white for a wedding dress. The drapey look seems to be in. Penelope Cruz has one. My friend who is a rising designer down here, and is going to make my wedding dress if I ever marry. She showed me this casual dress that the boutiques are marking up to $1295 in their stores and I’ve seen some of her designs so I told her maybe. I’m collecting pics and I love the Greek goddess drapey like dresses.

    Reply
  296. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    @Togi:
    Thank you! That is what I needed – a good laugh! Whew – feel better (But I still hope my boss chokes on the pink neckalce.) :-)

    Reply
  297. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    @Keane:
    but particularly not “well” who I don’t think is legit.

    Everyone has an opinion and everyone is entitled to their opinion. That bit of a sentence I copied from your post could be construed as being “ripped apart”. You show quite a bit of contempt and disrepect to certain posters. IMO/JMO.

    Reply
  298. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    @ backalleyknees – no probs my love, my advise is also free to give!

    @ Togi – ah hun you have a very generous soul. I just don’t like seeing people get taken for a ride that’s all. I’m glad you take what other posters say with a pinch of salt, the only thing we can really be sure of is what is coming from Ian and so on. Much love x

    Reply
  299. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    @ladybert62:
    … or a pink necklace. I hear those work well on rouge attorneys. Not that I know any personally, but I hear they’re out there! LOL

    Reply
  300. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    could be…like that baby poop green thing she wore when very preggers with the twins…..@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  301. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    @Peri:
    LOL, i noticed the same thing. he didn’t even crack a smile.

    Reply
  302. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    @Keane:
    A “pinch of salt” amiga???? Heck, I have an entire BOX of salt — the rock variety — sitting right next to my computer.

    Reply
  303. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    @sama:
    bb14. Looking at the photos I think she looks bloody awful. Now in those photos she is wearing a kindof tight hugging dress, she isn’t pregnant. My opinion he looks old in these red carpet photos. If you look at the interview he looks quite young and really good.

    Reply
  304. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    @another lurker:
    I like the dress and color as well, I don’t think they work on AJ. I’m a fan of the greek goddess dresses too. I’ve got big boobs and the way the ‘greek” dresses are put together, they work a lot better for me. Plus, it totally pisses me off when I watch Project Runway and they make this coutoureish dress for $60 when I know it will be sold for thousands in a store. Grrrrrrr! But again, it would be hard to wear spanx when the slit is that high…unless they have a new style out that only smooths the top?

    Reply
  305. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    @Keane:
    bb14. That was so funny can’t stop laughing. Good one keane

    Reply
  306. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    Here’s a little humor.

    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32146

    Reply
  307. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    We can only control ourselves. Never give anyone power over you to make you feel other than how you choose to feel. Take yourself back from Angie’s spidery hands, and realize it’s nothing big in the universe of your life. A passing fart in the wind, stinks while, then blows away, as she will also. Don’t dwell on a bad event, learn from it and move on with your life. I can’t see her sitting around daily trying to plot against you, she considers herself much to important a person to waste that much time on another. @well:

    Reply
  308. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    @too curious:
    http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m5d17-Jennifer-Aniston–Has-El-Pollo-Loco-meals-shipped-to-set-of-new-film
    As it happens, early on in HW, Brad used to have a job dressed as the Chicken. lol

    Reply
  309. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    @too curious:
    It can happen. Sometimes the camera or the lighting makes it look worse. But if you’re there to get photographed, wouldn’t you take that into consideration? It could be worse. She could be wearing Bjork’s goose-dress or Uma’s Swiss Miss ensemble.

    Reply
  310. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    @CC:
    Megan Fox has the same problem—she’s beautiful and then she opens her mouth and says something.

    Reply
  311. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @another lurker:
    I was at a ball in Cairo last weekend, at the foot of the Pyramids. Empire waists rule! Couldn’t imagine wearing spanx in that heat, you must have been in dire need of champagne!

    Reply
  312. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @ Iluno – ITA with you that everyone has an opinion and is entitled to it (within certain parameters obviously, homophobia is not ok, racism is not ok, abusing people because they are 40 years old, not as pretty as Angelina Jolie, childless and not in a successful relationship is not ok and so on). The difference with “well” is that she claims to have been the victim of serious harrassment from Angelina Jolie and has a huge story that she will one day go public with. She also claims through that to have a privileged knowledge of matters Brangelina because of it. That is entirely different to having an opinion on Brangelina or this site. She is saying that she is a story, not just an opinion. Every story posted on this site by Ian he has to corroborate as much as he can otherwise he could be sued very easily. Well on the other hand is posting a story containing very serious allegations without Ian having verified any of it or given any evidence whatsoever (although she claims she has a lot, a restraining order for one). She has beem posting on this site for many weeks discussing her trauma and many posters have given her a lot of sympathy, but for all anyone knows this could all be completely made up. I don’t trust what she says because no newspaper would print a story about a case of serious harrassment by the world’s most famous woman against someone without serious evidence, ideally a legal conviction. They will barely print negative comments about Jolie, they would not touch this with a 10 foot bargepole. If she got a criminal conviction then they’d be all over it like a rash – unless they still think Ange is a big seller and won’t want to jeopardise their relationship with her. But well would have a lot of difficulty in going to court with this now because she has talked about it at length in a public forum. If she were to go to court it would be picked up everywhere in the mainstream media. Then Ange’s lawyers could argue her case has been prejudiced and the trial would be dismissed. She claims to have very high-powered lawyers, so of course they would have told her not to discuss this anywhere, especially a gossip blog which she said she knew for a fact Jolie was reading. And further to that, if you were that traumatised by it there would be no way you would come somewhere where you knew your persecutor was reading and incite her to harrass you some more by talking about it at great length. Plus AJ would obviously know who she is so if she didn’t have actual evidence for every little thing she said she could be sued to within an inch of her life. The whole thing is ludicrous and can not possibly be true. Its that simple.

    Reply
  313. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @Patty anne:
    bb14. She was supposed to be 2-1/2 months along when we last heard that was months ago I think she would have a bit more of a bump by now by what she has got now. That picture taken in Hague she looks real skinny. Those photos taken after the dinner when they were with other people having their photo taken. She looked huge. What is her game.

    Reply
  314. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    Wow. The body language.
    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32146/images/spl101835_033.jpg

    Reply
  315. chris said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @Canuck:
    i thought you it wasn’t wise to get pregnant after a tummy tuck ?

    Reply
  316. Unfuckingbelievable said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    @liuno:

    Oh weren’t you aware? Keane is the Queen of Everything.

    Reply
  317. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    How can someone so thin look this heavy in this photo? Her face is rounded and she has the beginnings of a double chin.
    Then some of the other photos she’s spidery.
    Just a bad angle?
    These photos from Cannes are pretty fascinating.

    Reply
  318. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Whoops.
    The link–which you have all seen–to the photo I’m talking about:
    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32146/images/spl101835_002.jpg

    Reply
  319. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Exactly she’s not preggers.

    Reply
  320. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @pickwick:
    I love MK, that dress looks skanky and like a really long foreskin. LOVES IT!!! I can’t get over how off she looks.

    Reply
  321. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    Amen g/f. Not everyone has a steel trap mind such as you. It took me awhile to see through it.@Keane:

    Reply
  322. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Is it just me, or is there ass padding showing through here?
    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32146/images/spl101835_004.jpg
    @chris:
    I have no idea, haven’t had one, but she is rumoured to have done so.

    Reply
  323. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @chris:
    I thought it wasn’t wise to have 3 c-sections? (the third would be a new baby).

    Reply
  324. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    To Ian:

    Come on Ian! If Tarentino is dying to work with Jolie then she wouldn`t have to smooch up to him at Cannes! As always you contradict yourself – but that is nothing new is it?

    Reply
  325. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    I’ll bet she ate a couple of bags of potato chips and then drank a liter bottle of Badoit water, which is quite salty. Instant bloat, her face didn’t look like that the day before in Holland.

    Reply
  326. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    So Ian did you hear from the Sudanese model lately? Has she met Pitt yet? How about giving us an update?

    Reply
  327. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    @pickwick:
    I LOVE the pic of BP trying to avoid stepping on AJ’s dress (or had he already done so?) and the LOOK AJ is giving him! Priceless! There is not one HAPPY look on either of their faces in any of these pictures.

    Reply
  328. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    bb14. I may be wrong, but that interview with Anne Curry do you think it from Cannes.?? Because he looks so young and good there and when you see him on the red carpet he looks very old , tired and run out of energy I just can’t see how some-ones image can change so much from interview to Cannes red carpet. What do you guys think???

    Reply
  329. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Canuck:

    Hard to tell but it does look that way…

    Reply
  330. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    That foreskin comment made me ‘laugh out loud’!
    I’ve never read her before. Someone linked above and I thought it was great.

    Reply
  331. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:

    I think that some TV shows use filters for a softer light. Oprah certainly does this to an extreme!

    Reply
  332. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    @ Patty Anne – thanks hun, I’m glad you can see it too now. Well that makes 4 of us at least!

    Reply
  333. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    @pickwick:
    bb14. I betcha she’s saying smile darling the cameras are rolling jmo

    Reply
  334. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    @Canuck:
    Hmmm.There is SOMETHING there. She appears to be mostly naked everywhere else. It’s an odd shape, though.

    Reply
  335. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    @pickwick:
    Dlisted is one of my favorite sites. Totally crass and I always get a great laugh. The writer is Michael K (he’s a guy). Loved that he put “chicken cutlets” on the same photo spread as The Brand. Way to bring true glamore Mz. Price!

    Reply
  336. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    I’m not sure. I’m at work so I can’t actually watch the video at the moment. But, they may have worked their HW “magic”, I mean make-up artists et all. But you can’t mask the bs and distaste that is obviously in his mouth (no matter how much you spackle his face) while walking the RC with Damien Grey the succubus at his side. JMO

    Reply
  337. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    @Togi:
    Yeah. I don’t know about anyone else, but there is enough drama between them without a Sudanese model showing up.
    In the one pic I liked to, she does look like she had been crying. The zombie face is gone and there is a great sadness there—Brad is anger, anger, anger. Except for the fake kiss when he looked depressed looking in her direction.

    Reply
  338. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    @pickwick:
    Yes, sort of like a high cut swimsuit leg, no doubt due to the slit. Anyone think it’s possible that the padding extends to the front?

    Reply
  339. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @Keane:

    You make such a good summation. I have no idea if she is for real, probably not, but offering to lend her an “ear” isn’t anything against you, I hope you realize that. I figure even if she is a fake and I listen to her, no harm, no foul. If she is for real and no one shows any compassion, that is a sorry state of affairs. Does that make sense? And I really appreciate you looking out for the rest of us, I enjoy your posts and definitely believe you are for real.

    And, let’s face it, there is a reason I use the moniker “too curious” because I am. As curious as a cat without the 9 lives!!

    Reply
  340. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    If someone tells you to your face exactly as they see things, i don’t believe you need to be careful of finding a knife in your back; the matter is therefore open to discussion. It’s those who show pleanty of teeth to your face while snarling behind your back that are a danger to all. Keane tells it as she sees it…total honesty….straight out there. Those who feel attacked, threatened by it obviously have reason to. Be it they are knowingly embellishing a story, outright lying, or just seeking attention. I watch reactions. I have never seen Keane make anything personal, she states issues and facts….as if moderating . Ease up on Keane, and if she bothers you that much, consider going elsewhere. I’m grateful for her sharp mind and assists with the clues to this Brand. Stick to the storys Ian posts and don’t get off on personal issues in an open blog form that will most likely upset someone , sometime. Now i am retiring my soapbox….all my comments are well meaning, and No Pun Intended

    Reply
  341. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    Hi all, just checking in. Wow, the pix! That is one busted looking bitch. AJ looks bad too.

    Reply
  342. carol said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    @Keane:
    I know this is slightly O/T but… I rather doubt that MJ’s concert rescheduling (only 5 days difference) has anything to do with alleged “failing health” as Ian reported. If Ian’s reports were accurate, Michael Jackson would have been confined to a medical bed in intensive care at CHMCLA months ago, and would be on his final days right now since it was last December Ian ran with the widely reported headline: “IUC Exclusive: Michael Jackson does not have more than Six Months To Live” Not just the Alpha-1 stuff, but Ian exclusively reported he had many life threatening diseases including emphysema, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, partial blindness and muteness, lung disease but too weak to get a transplant, and others. Ian also exclusively reported the vomit-inducing details that MJ can’t even wipe his own butt, saying: “they use a machine that looks like a mini vacuum to go up his butthole to get all the dirt out.” Eww. Either way most major artists including Madonna have had concerts delayed and postponed due to logistical matters, it happens all the time to the frustration of many.

    Reply
  343. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @Keane:
    Uh, Keane, some people can see things but they are a bit nervous bringing them up because they are new.
    I was thinking that perhaps she thinks this is true? We don’t know who is posting–they could be anywhere or in any…um…..state of mind.
    I’m not saying anything bad about anyone. Perhaps she has a Hegelian sense of reality? Just a thought.

    Reply
  344. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @carol:
    Perhaps. I hope he is well. But he sure looks very ill.

    Reply
  345. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @pickwick:
    DListed, Michael K-personally, I think he is one of the funniest people on the interwebs!

    Reply
  346. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    hahahahahahhaa!

    Reply
  347. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    @Togi:
    I know – I am so annoyed with a certain BOSS that I can hardly type! Some MEN are just so arrogant and pieces of shit! Maybe he will choke on his lunch!! Oops, there I go again, taking out my aggressions on my keyboard – gosh, I am surprised I have any keys left considering the god damn males I have to deal with on an every day basis! Time for a mental health sick day – I feel it coming on! :-)

    Reply
  348. backalleyknees said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @all
    Have to get some stuff done! Have a great whatever time of the day it is wherever you are! Hope there’s more new stuff posted soon! I still want to know what happened last night at their hotel….

    Reply
  349. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @Keane:

    I do not think you have ripped anyone; I think your posts are very logical. As a matter of fact I was taunting that loon this morning with my thoughts on the intellect and humor of the posters of this board and you are a big part of that. I guess I just haven’t gone back through all the posts to spot her inconsistencies to the degree you have. I hope I haven’t offended you because I certainly haven’t meant to say or indicate the slightest negative thing about you. You’re such a major part of this board, can’t imagine IUC without you!

    Reply
  350. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @Canuck:
    Why would she have padding ? Is she so skinny that people would comment? The ensemble is a mess, but I guess that is in keeping with her comments about feeling sorry for people who have to take the time and trouble to get ready for the red carpet. She must have dressed in the limo on the way over. What a mess.

    I know I keep mentioning it, and several people have come up with valid reasons why this could be true–but there is quite a disparity between the appearance of her face and her body. I’m very close to concluding it is from crying. When I’ve been crying a lot and I’m really melancholy, my face is puffy for awhile.
    The crying story was probably true, I think.

    Reply
  351. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    You know, the more I look at that photo, the more I think I’m right. She’s got padding on the front too. you can see the line going back down the front just above the sash like thing.
    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32146/images/spl101835_004.jpg

    Reply
  352. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Sounds like my last boss. He would stand behind me for two hours and watch for me to make a mistake on the keyboard or with a client. He got angry because he felt I was too NICE to his clients.

    Reply
  353. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @pickwick:

    Which pick is that?? I’ve looked at so many today I can’t place the one your describe.

    I think what looks so weird is her jawline on the right side. Something just looks wrong…could some sort of implant be slipping?? I know nothing about plasltic surgery.

    Reply
  354. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Canuck:
    Just to pile in here in WTF is up with those gnawed off nails? As a champion nailbiter, even I know to get the viva nails!

    Reply
  355. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    LOL, you are too funny. By the way, I suspect you might actually be George Clooney, inverted initials you know. Are you?

    Reply
  356. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Canuck:
    In that photo, it looks like it covers her rear but doesn’t mold to it. It almost seems like a padded skirt. Also, from that angle, it looks like there IS some sort of undergarment covering her tummy. But I don’t see much in front–guess those ridiculous slits would show them.

    Reply
  357. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    @Canuck:

    At the Mena House? That’s where the one I went to was. It was the 2004 Marine birthday ball. I had this whirlwind romance with the first crush of my life (who contacted 20 years later, asking, weren’t you my neighbor) and he was serving as a diplomat and flew me out to Egypt for 2 weeks. That place was so beautiful. Use to be a castle.

    Reply
  358. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    I don’t know if this is true but i read this

    In the official Cannes page (www.festival-cannes.fr) they already have 4 long videos up of today’s Ingl. Bas. related activites including the Red Carpet (look at the STEPS video). The video is over 50 min. long and B&A don’t show up until after min. 32 but brad is briefly interviewed and asked “You love being in Cannes?” And Brad replies “especially with Quentin” and then he grabs Angelina going by and says “AND THIS LOVELY LADY”.

    That doesn’t sound to me as somebody who is faking the red carpet because he hasn’t had to do that and the kissing photo’s also

    I think they are still together…….

    Reply
  359. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    No manicure, no gel nails either. Probably too busy prosecuting Congolese warlords to have them done.

    Reply
  360. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    Oh, and being a Florida girl, if it is under 75, I’m freezing.

    Reply
  361. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    I’m sort of thrown off by the fact that her head seems to be so large in proportion to the rest of her body…..@pickwick:

    Reply
  362. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @Keane:
    I never said I believed or not. My reply was for you, how you respond to others and how individuals are just that, individuals with their own opinions. Save your “breath” and all on here a lengthy post.

    Reply
  363. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Her knuckles look very odd – sort of gorilla-ish. Maybe she should consider getting full body makeup before a red carpet event.

    Reply
  364. chris said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    i didn’t remember how many you could have. i had one for my first kid, and i insisted to have the second naturally, so i didn’t really ask.

    Reply
  365. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @too curious:
    This one. Brad looks angry and she looks like she’s been crying a lot.
    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32146/images/spl101835_033.jpg

    Reply
  366. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @pickwick:
    LOL I am not GC. Because I am not gay.

    Reply
  367. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @chris:
    You were VERY lucky to get to have a natural birth after a C-Section. Many doctors won’t even consider that. It’s great that you were able to do it!

    Reply
  368. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    LOL. Funny, she normally drapes herself all over him. i don’t see the “death grip” in any of the red carpet photos

    Reply
  369. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @another lurker:
    Nope, I’ve been to three but the first two were held in the desert in a big tent near the Pyramids. This year, they took over the place where the Sound and Light show is usually held. Much better, working toilets that weren’t in a sort of big toilet truck. Pavement, so no sand in your shoes either, lol What a great place to hold a party!

    Love Mena House, did the golf course there a few times too, even if it’s really crappy. It was one of those “things that you absolutely have to do” when you have golfing friends visiting.

    Reply
  370. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    @pickwick:

    Ah, I see what you mean. If it were me there wouldn’t be enough makeup in the world to cover my red nose & eyes after crying!!

    Reply
  371. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @pickwick:
    Yes with the crying hangover face. For sure.

    Reply
  372. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @TobyKat:
    I think she gave him the death grip before the pix, that is what ripped her nails off.

    Reply
  373. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    LOL!

    Reply
  374. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Bummer, he writes really good letters, LOL

    Reply
  375. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Or maybe she had to claw Ann Curry off of him after the interview…

    Reply
  376. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @too curious:
    Yeah, my face swells up and turns red if I’ve been crying. Makeup would never work for me.

    Reply
  377. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    I can personally confirm that! CG is definately not George :-)

    Reply
  378. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    @too curious:
    What was going on with Ann Curry this morning? I was watching before work and I just thought, basically, crudely, ‘WTF”?

    Reply
  379. Unfuckingbelievable said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    Fess up Keane…you just can’t stand the attention that Well’s story takes away from you…that’s why you go on and on and on and on about it. FOR THE ATTENTION.
    YOU’RE THE PSYCHOPATH!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Have a nice day.

    Reply
  380. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    @Canuck:

    You live there?

    It was great though. It was indoors so I didn’t worry much. I went down to Sharm and dove the Red Sea. And actually, the one meal I did NOT like was that night at the ball. The best place was when we went to the Italian Embassy. It was awesome.

    Reply
  381. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    @too curious:
    True that. She probably had to chew her off of BP and went too far, thus the nail problem. OCD on the nail biting for sure.

    Reply
  382. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @another lurker:
    We had a few Houston girls who were sweating on the dance floor, maybe it’s not the heat, it’s the exercise. But we were also outside with no A/C, which isn’t the case for the ballroom in the Mena House. You freeze your tushy off in any of the hotels there, A/C strong enough to give you pneumonia!

    Reply
  383. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    bb14. I have just had a closer look at her dress. It is the material in front that makes her look pregnant. I remember when my daughter tried wedding dresses on there were a couple which had the same material bulge design in the front. I remember saying to her “don’t wear anything like that you look like you are pregnant.” She couldn’t get it off fast enough.

    Reply
  384. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    @too curious:
    Nicely put. With dignity and respect.

    Reply
  385. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    http://www.lifeandstylemag.com/2009/05/922-cover-inset—angie.html

    Does this make the slightest bit of sense to anyone? An AJ planted story if ever I’ve seen one. When exactly is it that she has soooooooo much time with the kids???

    Reply
  386. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @TobyKat:
    Yeah, I am just an about-to- be 50 saleswoman with a bad heart trying to rock my silver hair like Emmylou H. That is about all I have going for me, LOL.

    Reply
  387. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @another lurker:
    Did, but don’t any more. Loved it there, perfect golf weather every day. Nice people who like to laugh, even if they aren’t particularly efficient. Yes, the Mena House isn’t known for it’s food, especially when they have a function for 900 people or so. The Indian restaurant there is pretty good though.

    Reply
  388. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:

    Excuse me, but the one that seems to be really freaking out and typing in CAPS is you. At the very least, Keane goes out of the way to explain why she has objections. Frankly, if the person is so unstable that a picture of The One freak her out where she is at the point of a mental breakdown, that girl needs to step away from the computer and go get some help. I would hate to see her reaction at the checkout line where there’s a good 50/50 chance the witch will be on the cover. It’s posters like you who come here and derail the thread to attack Keane and go on and on and on. Get over yourself.

    What a freakin spaz.

    Reply
  389. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @pickwick:
    Yes – her evil eyes look like they are puffy from crying – GOOD!!

    Reply
  390. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @Canuck:

    My friend lived in Madi. I thought the people were great. Very cool you lived there.

    Reply
  391. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @ Patty Anne – thanks very much for your post hun, I know I open myself up to attack now when questioning what people say because of the “Keane is a bully, Keane thinks she knows it all, Keane is nuts and so on and so on ad infinitum” tags. However, I am not here on any blog to win a popularity contest so if someone doesn’t like me that is there prerogative and it doesn’t bother me. I have two main reasons fro being here: 1) to see a woman whose behaviour I abhor knocked off her pedestal 2) to entertain myself, to have a good laugh and chat to the people commenting here who I like (nearly everyone). People can slag me off and laugh at me on other gossip blogs until they are blue in the face if they like, it does not bother me. I only care about being liked by people who I respect, unfortuantely the likes of UFB for example are slightly deluded about how relevant their views are to me. However, they can keep up with their bashing if it makes them feel better about themselves, it doesn’t appear that they have much else in their lives. Plus, this is only the internet, there is a big wide world out there and I have a great life that has nothing to do with this so all the fuss over my comments I find hilarious. So WHATEVER! Thanks for your support though, its much appreciated.

    @ too curious – don’t worry hun, you haven’t offended me at all, I was just concerned to see so many people sucked in by someone when there is no proof of what she has said whatsoever. I see all the new posters here following a pattern from all the fakes who came and went from the very beginning (literally dozens of them now). They all follow on from each other and when one fails another starts with a slightly different tack. I can remember what all of them said and all their names quite well because my memory is very good. That’s not to say I’m always right about everyone because I’m not, but if I’m not it doesn’t take long for them to prove they are genuine. With others like well and SZ the more they say the more they show to me they aren’t. Its just difficult to see that if you haven’t been following the comments section every day from the beginning that’s all. No worries at all about what you think re well and other posters though.

    @ pickwick – well there you go you see you shouldn’t be nervous about bringing that up, everyone should be able to question someone who is claiming a privileged access to or a personal connection to the subject in hand. That is everyone’s right. I feel a tactic of being too traumatised for words is being used to prevent people from questioning things and that is total manipulation. Sound familiar to anyone? If people are going to make outlandish claims they have to be prepared to be questioned about them and to demonstrate that they stand up. If they are mentally not up to doing that then they really should not be getting involved in the antagonistic world of commenting on gossip blogs. And yeah, re your assessment, it is of course possible, I just think its probably a bit more purposeful than that. All the other fakes have been about dissuading people from believing the stories or reading the blog all along. They have tried dozens of different (and often ludicrous) arguments and tacks. I think this poster is possibly just trying to gain the sympathy and trust of other posters so that they can try something like that further on down the line. That’s my theory anyway!

    Reply
  392. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    With a good sense of humour and who likes conspiracy theories :)

    Reply
  393. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @Patty anne:
    I agree, Keane is not attacking, just stating facts, to which I understand as well. This is not that difficult , an olive branch was extended long ago, and while I have said the jury is out, how long must it remain out? As Patty Anne has said though, much too much time is wasted on this. I really do want to have compassion, but this is just not that difficult.

    “Well” I really do hope you will just hand this over to IAN and trust him as we do, not quite sure why you are here if you don’t.

    Patty Anne, if that bioth Lainey keeps it up, I am going to need some therapy too. lol

    Now damn it, these too are putting on a friggin show, it makes it a wee bit hard to have sympathy for Bradley when he is putting it out there like that with the whore.

    Okay so maybe she is bloated, or she stuffed her panties.

    LOL

    IAN, help calm our nerves pleassssssssssse.????????????

    Reply
  394. chris said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @pickwick:
    they usually refuse to do it here too, it depends on the reason why you had the first one. in my case the first doctor pretended my baby was too big (actually he was afraid i give birth during his hollidays !), but i did radiographies and the second gyn told be that i had all the room necessary for a big baby. she was the best doctor in the town where i used to live and i took her only to avoid c-section. you’re not an actor in your child’s birth and it’s too painfull.

    Reply
  395. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @pickwick:
    Well, she has no ass, so the padding would make sense there. I can think of at least one reason that she might wear padding on the front along with a pale tight dress.

    Reply
  396. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    @Canuck:
    bb14. Why would she be wearing padding?? Can anybody tell me. I know one thing by looking at the photo she has awfully big ears.

    Reply
  397. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:21 pm

    sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:59 pm
    I don’t know if this is true but i read this

    In the official Cannes page (www.festival-cannes.fr) they already have 4 long videos up of today’s Ingl. Bas. related activites including the Red Carpet (look at the STEPS video). The video is over 50 min. long and B&A don’t show up until after min. 32 but brad is briefly interviewed and asked “You love being in Cannes?” And Brad replies “especially with Quentin” and then he grabs Angelina going by and says “AND THIS LOVELY LADY”.

    What do you all think about it this is not someone faking it at the red carpet, there was no question asked he had no point to do this
    And then you have the kissing photo’s

    Are you all realling thinking they are faking it?

    Reply
  398. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @Kate:
    That was nice Kate.

    Reply
  399. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    @ Iluno

    “Save your breath and others a lengthy post” – not “ripping” in to me at all there, very “respectfully put” Iluno. I think you’ve pretty much said all you need to say about yourself there.

    @ UFB – poor UFB, so sad, so stupid. I hope you get a blow-job one day my friend, it would help bolster that fragile little ego of yours and I would hate to see any man die a virgin. I fear with you it is highly likely though.

    Reply
  400. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @Canuck:

    Hmmm…Houston girls sweating was probably not the heat but not being in the A/C. We use many methods to tame our weather here and do get a little spoiled. Underground tunnels with A/C and shops below downtown buildings, sports stadiums with retractable roofs, A/C walkways between buildings, and according to natives Houston was granted a dispensation letting buildings here set the A/C colder than was mandated by law in the 70’s during the energy crisis. Most fancy dress affairs here would at a minimum be in a tent with A/C during hot weather :)

    Reply
  401. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Unfuckingbelievable:
    Huh? Where the heck did THAT come from? Have a nice day, indeed!

    Reply
  402. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Dang – I have read about 4 reviews of Inglorious Basterd – all panned it. The best comment (aside from the Guardian ’s review) was that a Jewish review called it Jewish Porn – for the attempt to kill Hilter! Funny. I wonder does the Hapless Mr. Pitt even read the script before he starts in on a project – or does someone else read them for him and then says – ya, do it hapless! Seems to be a real loser for him. :-)

    Reply
  403. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    You can also see a line in the front, in this picture:

    http://www.dlisted.com/node/32146/images/spl101835_004.jpg

    So, is she trying to stir up rumours about being pregnant?

    Reply
  404. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @Canuck:
    Opps, wrong link
    http://www.celebitchy.com/51962/brad_angelina_cannes_red_carpet_for_inglourious_basterds/

    Reply
  405. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @sama:
    bb14. What else could he say. Sorry I don’t buy it they are so ovah.

    Reply
  406. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @Canuck:
    DID SOMEONE SAY CONSPIRACY THEORY? CG reporting for duty.

    Reply
  407. gossipwench said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    Keep drinking the Kool Aid.

    :-P

    Reply
  408. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    @ another lurker – thanks hun, that was hilarious. You can’t reason with UFB though, he’s way too idiotic. He doesn’t do arguments or opinions either, he would never put himself out there to be attacked, far too insecure I would imagine. He just does taking the piss out of other people, cos that makes him feel like he doesn’t have the teeny-weeny he obviously has. He’s just a tedious tit, nothing more, nothing less.

    @ Kate – thanks my lovely, original and best internet chum, your support is valued as always. I am so sick of talking about this stupid crap but when people suggested giving their emails to well I was like God no this has to stop! Anyway, let’s get back to the subject in hand: what the hell was she thinking wearing that slashed to the snatch gown?????!!!! Lol

    Reply
  409. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    You are sooooooooooo funny CG! By the way, my husband LOVED your swine flu conspiracy theory!!!!!

    Reply
  410. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:

    he grabbed her when he was interviewed and seeiing that, why does he do that if they are faking it.
    if the interviewer asked a question about them then i can understand it but it was not the case…

    i said it before i don’t know what to believe but when you are faking it then you don’t kiss in a corner of a restaurant and you don’t say the things he says without being asked for it

    Reply
  411. another lurker said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Keane:

    Probably pissed that a Tic Tac has more girth. Whenever I see someone type in all caps like that, I imagine what they are like in person. Definitely not someone I want at my wine and cheese get togethers. What a low rent freak!

    Okay, gotta run. Dinner party tonight. I am loving my one class this summer in Fed Income Tax has a light workload. I have so much more me time.

    Have a good night folks. I’ll try to check in later after food.

    Reply
  412. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    @liuno:
    I know Keane gets tired of this just as I do, she has far more patience than I do, so I say as little as possible or it will not be nicely said. When my buttons get pushed , it is the red switch, lol.

    Reply
  413. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    @Keane:
    AJ wore that slashed to the _____ gown cuz she could pull it back to flash a … uh hum … LEG whenever a man came anywhere near her. LOL

    I see gossipwench is back.

    Reply
  414. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    They left

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/and-that-s-a-wrap-folks-leaving-the-theater-t225350.html

    Reply
  415. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @ carol – just saw the MJ thing on the BBC evening news again, said some of the concerts have been postponed until next year and ticket buyers are being offered refunds. Not sure where you heard it was only a matter of days, they must have had that wrong. MJ’s people say it is “not related to his health” though!!! Yeah he just needs another 6-18 months to prepare I guess! Apparently he was only due to “perform” for a grand total of 13 mintues per show anyway. The rest was to be filled in by dancers, impersonators, circus acts and God knows what or something. I honestly don;t think he’s capable of performing any more. He showed up at some awards do in the UK a year or two ago to collect a lifetime achievement award but did not perform. He sang one line I think as a sop to the crowd. I don’t think he’s a well man.

    Reply
  416. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    @Canuck:

    just..odd. that is all there is to say IMO.

    maybe she is trying to go for a look that she can spin any way: 1) preggo, 2) “poor Angie is so exhausted from taking care of her kids and being a saintly humanitarian”, 3) “I’m not shallow – I don’t care about my appearance, see I’m on the red carpet at Cannes wearing Versace and make it look like crap”, 4) see, I can make the “Sexiest Man Alive” look like crap, too or 5) um, in disguise so Thomas Lubanga Dyilo can’t find her and look at her again once he escapes from his trial for war crimes

    LOL

    Reply
  417. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @Keane:

    “If people are going to make outlandish claims they have to be prepared to be questioned about them and to demonstrate that they stand up.”

    Now if that is what you believe then I wonder why you have problems with people questioning some of Ian`s stories? Because I have yet to see proof for one single claim that Ian has made wether it is about Brangelina (almost exclusively lately because that gives him the most hits) or anyone else!

    Seems like your believes apply only to other posters (although I agree with you on that one story you mentioned) and not to your worshipped gossip god Ian!

    Reply
  418. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @Keane:
    As a southern girl, I admire your use of the word, “Hun”. I LOL everytime.

    Reply
  419. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @sama:
    Sama, she is the mother of his children, I doubt he hates her, and his feelings are probably very complicated. When he drinks he gets like that, doesn’t mean anything, although if the person he is involved with now is watching I would think it would be enough to piss them off. I do see what you mean though, although they could be putting on a show to shut down the split rumors, or she blasted him for the A Curry interview and he is trying to make up for it. All in all though, yeah it is very questionable. They did the same thing 2 years ago when she wore the yellow, all night they were distant, then at the end they were making out drunk in the car. That shut down all the split rumors.

    Reply
  420. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @gossipwench:
    Nom nom nom

    Reply
  421. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    He seems to be blaming it on five bottles of wine last summer at their chateau…..And lord knows what else was going on..Saw that on E …I think it was E…..@ladybert62:

    Reply
  422. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @sama:

    I love the comment, where was she hiding the purse earlier, maybe in the fabric at the front of her dress…

    Reply
  423. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @ Canuck – wow that ball sounds like my kind of party, I can’t think of a better one in fact, can I come next time?!

    @ another lurker – yes I don’t know much about UFB but I think the root of the issue must be in his penis, I’m not sure there is a brain much there to consider! Have a great evening.

    @ Togi – yes its very different to her recent looks isn’t it, and with that red lipstick too, its so tarty. This has to be a statement of some sort, nothing about that woman is not meant to be a statement. Kind of contradicts the Hague seriousness yesterday doesn’t it? Not exactlty in harmony with the horrors she was witnessing only the day before though hey? Hell I’m sure a little contradiction like that wouldn’t bother her though. Tomorrow witnessing a trial in the Hague on war crimes permitted against children, today getting one’s snatch out for the cameras. Yep, can’t see a problem there, can you?!

    Reply
  424. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @too curious:
    um, in disguise so Thomas Lubanga Dyilo can’t find her and look at her again once he escapes from his trial for war crimes

    OMFG stop you are killing me

    Reply
  425. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @Keane:
    I tell ya, I am sick of the PDA show these two are putting on, I really can not take it anymore. I was hoping something was going to shut this down, but it didn’t happen. Now what, six more months of this bullshit?

    I was feeling sorry for him. even when he did Ann C, but not now. Dumbass.

    Reply
  426. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @toni:
    toni – fact of the matter is we’re all here because we LIKE Ian and we believe him. You’re always welcome to go elsewhere.

    Reply
  427. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @Keane:
    @ Togi – yes its very different to her recent looks isn’t it, and with that red lipstick too, its so tarty. This has to be a statement of some sort, nothing about that woman is not meant to be a statement. Kind of contradicts the Hague seriousness yesterday doesn’t it? Not exactlty in harmony with the horrors she was witnessing only the day before though hey? Hell I’m sure a little contradiction like that wouldn’t bother her though. Tomorrow witnessing a trial in the Hague on war crimes permitted against children, today getting one’s snatch out for the cameras. Yep, can’t see a problem there, can you?!

    I’ll see your Hun and raise you a “bless her little heart”

    Reply
  428. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    “I’ll see your Hun and raise you a “bless her little heart” … and I will color you DARLING. LOL

    Reply
  429. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @Keane:
    As the ladies in Boca Ratan would say (about AJ contradiction):
    She’s a hoooooooooooooooooah! aka as we would say in OKLA:
    “no count triflin’ heifer”

    Reply
  430. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @ toni – nope not at all, as I said in my original post, Ian has to get extensive corroboration for the stories he publishes, he is putting his name to them and his neck and career on the line. If he hasn’t done his best to stand the stories up he will be sued and the site is gone, simple as that. “Well” is an annonymous commenter on the blog, she’s not putting her real name to it and no journo has corroborated her story. Totally different situation. Believe me when I say I’ve done this sort of thing in a professional context for the most reputable broadcasters on the most sensitive topics on programmes with the most stringent editorial strandards in the world. I do know what I’m talking about in this area. I can’t tell you whether the stories Ian posts are true or not, all I can say is that he isn’t just plucking them out of thin air and throwing them up on the blog. That would be the end of his career. He has published a number of books on celebs he knows what he’s doing otherwise those books would never have been published. He has one being edited right now. Ian and well are two completely different kettles of fish entirely.

    Reply
  431. Togi said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @Kate:
    ITA!!!! Pretty disgusting if you ask me. He should have stuck to Perrier water!

    Reply
  432. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @Keane:
    That was probably the last one we do as most of our “core group” of friends have been transferred this summer. Guess we’re just going to have to find something equally fabulous to do locally. Midnight ball at Stonehenge?

    Reply
  433. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @sama:
    He couldn’t stay long. His wax date was starting to melt.

    Reply
  434. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @ CG – ok you’re making me laugh out loud but I confess I have no idea what you are talking about! Don’t you use “hun” in the south (I assume America?!). Everyone I know is a hun or a darling or a babe or a my lovely to me, I am overly affectionate by nature!!! You’re not a Brit are you? (Confused Keane alert!)

    Reply
  435. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Ha ha ha yup she is a Biatch with a capital B

    Reply
  436. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    Aw shucks, thanks, ma’am — just another little bit of Southern for you!

    Reply
  437. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    She looks to me to be continuing with her No Panties rule….@pickwick:

    Reply
  438. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @Keane:
    You are very humorous. You can dish it out but you can’t take it. I wasn’t ripping on you but of course if your opinion is that than I was. Right? And, in your opinion what have I said about myself? Perhaps what others have said about you? I’ve read many of your posts and took you as being educated and intelligent. Think about our little banter.

    Reply
  439. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @Keane:

    I think those of us living in the South (I’m not a native but I’ve been here over half of my life) just love to hear what we think of as Southern speak being used elsewhere.

    Reply
  440. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    That is odd, her stomach looks much flatter in the pics of her leaving. She must have taken the padding out. lol

    Her face sure was swollen going in.

    So, IAN, the scoop, what is really going on? SUGAR RAY boys , what is up?

    Reply
  441. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @Kate:
    where is the PDA? Did I miss this? Is it on a video link? I saw the pictures….help

    @Keane:
    Hi Keane, Why doesn’t your @ whoever come out in red? That way we can read the post you are responding to when we hover our curser over their name? I am going back constantly to see what you are posting to because I love to read all your comments. On another note, Iwas one of the first ones ME responded to with her reply ” she’s inhumane.” So my jury is STILL out on her. I STILL want to believe someone has something horrifying they can tell us about AJ. I really want to believe Me/Well so there is a good personal account we can dig into…oh well

    Reply
  442. carol said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @Keane:

    Only the first four dates (out of 50) were postponed, and the whole concert series has only been offset by a few days like I said. The opening show will still start this July, but it has been moved several days ahead from July 8th to July 13th, with one new concert virtually every other day from July through September, and again from January through March. Three of the four postponed dates have indeed been pushed to next March (which would totally piss me off if I were a ticket holder expecting to go this summer) but the rest of the dates are still on schedule, with exception of opening night which is a few days delayed. So again, there is only a five day difference in concert plans, overall. He’s not putting the whole thing off until next year! I located the official schedule and FAQs from the ticket site at: http://tinyurl.com/pnfbex

    Reply
  443. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @Kate:
    It’s my opinion you have more patience & compassion. Or perhaps it’s more restraint.

    Reply
  444. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @Kate:

    So she WAS hiding her purse in there!

    I agree, hoping for some more juicy scoops from Ian and Sugar Ray!

    Ian, sorry I was so impatient this morning that I commented before you had the entire entry up :)

    Reply
  445. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @Kate:
    I am with you 100%. I still believe they are through however. He stammered when asked by AC if this is the happiest time of his life. i would think he would say some bullshit like yes I’m a lucky man, a wonderful woman by side, great kids, we were blessed twice this past year blah blah blah.
    For some reason the show must go on. What i want to know from Ian is why???????

    Reply
  446. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @ Canuck – wow do they do that, I love all that Celtic stuff believe me, there are some great stone circles and the like back where I’m origninally from, their wild I love them. I have one MAJOR problem with a ball at Stonehenge though. Its is the following: COLD. Can’t stand the cold, won’t do anything where I may potentially get cold, I love heat and will do anything that involves getting as warm as possible. Its got to be those pyramids for me. Got to go one day, ball or no ball, just find the terrism a bit worrying which is stupid living in London I know but there you go!

    @ Kate – I think Brad gets pissed, gets horny and ends up banging her. She “uses sex as a weapon” (Friends quote) I reckon – ha ha! Couples who’ve had long relationships and split meet up and against their better judgment end up in bed all the time, I know I have! I don’t think a bang between ex’s means anything. Poor Brad though, he must be snatchmatized. Lol! God their display today has been hideous though, what a pair of peacocks – yuck!

    Reply
  447. CinDee said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    Eeeeewwww. Sexy feet. I’ve always thought her feet were the ugliest part of her body…sort of apelike feet. She has prehensile toes. I can imagine them looped around the limb of a tree while she swings from limb to limb.

    Reply
  448. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    @sama:
    When did he grab her? I am missing some very valuable info it seems. When were they kissing in a corner of a restaurant? Link????

    Reply
  449. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @Togi:
    What is disgusting is that she dressed like a harlot and tried to upstage all the other girls in his picture. What a total bitch. I wonder if he knew what she was going to wear. When she walked she would pull up the dress so it was open to her snatch. So classy, mother of six. Yeah Brad, what a lovely lady.

    Reply
  450. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @Keane:

    ITA – and assumed you mean pissed as in drunk, not angry :)

    Reply
  451. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Keane:
    hi read my post at 5:03. thanks

    Reply
  452. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Keane:
    That is pathetic is he is truly trying to free himself from her grip, reahb and all.

    Reply
  453. Constant Gardner said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @Keane:
    Well, yes that is very common in the South. Where I am from, which isn’t really south but is very southern culturally with some redneck thrown in, OKLAFUCKINGHOMA, LOL, when a woman addresses another woman as ‘Hun” it is a put down. It is sort of like saying, “Look, bitch”

    As for the use of “bless your/her heart” that is also a very sarcastic remark. It is a way for southern womento express themselves without using vile and vulgah, coarse language such as, “Jesus God she is one fucked upbitch!” Which is what I meant about AJ and the contradiction.

    PS I am stoned. Take nothing I say seriously.

    I hope this helps.

    Reply
  454. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    I’ve noticed when one starts an attack against Keane, they soon disappear, and the other shows up to continue an attack. Double team so to say. Sounds phony to me. Not here to get help, or find an ear that will listen but to sidetrack the topic, get off the subject of Jolie, and create a hostile invironment eventually leading to taking sides. Then….what happens to the one place most of us said we were so glad we found? Intelligent, respectful dialog between adults on a subject we all find of interest? Ian’s success was long earned, i’d hate to see a small “group effort” destroy what we all enjoy so well. If it becomes/continues name calling, cap’s loonish dialog, then i’m out of here. There is pleanty of that on FF and Lainey’s Loons….If Jolie upsets someone to the point of needing psychiatric help….why then do they come to the one place where the topic is and has been Jolie for ages? Why not go to a blog for Friends Helping Friends With Issues? Nope…it’s not for help, it’s to disrupt this blog, and our discussions of the evils of The Dark Queen…Did i mention my ex is a diagnosed Schizophrenic and i’ve spent years and years with psychiatrists and mental institutions with him as a patient? I’ve been thru it all…and seen lots. This is NOT the place for therapy for a disturbed person, nor should any of us be put in the position of responsibility for someone’s mental health. If well is truly disturbed, look to the local emergency room in the United States and you will be given a clinical diagnosis, and assigned a therapist to aid you….you won’t get professional mental help here @Kate:

    Reply
  455. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    @Keane:

    “That would be the end of his career. He has published a number of books on celebs he knows what he’s doing otherwise those books would never have been published. He has one being edited right now. Ian and well are two completely different kettles of fish entirely.”

    Really Keane you talk like Ian is an respected scientist that has a great reputaion and a aclaimed career that he could put at risk. Only problem is that all he is is another gossip writer – even though a more outragious one then anyone else I have come across on the internet. And Ian has neither an aclaimed career (just publishing a few gossip books filled with half-truths and made up stories is definately NOT a career in my mind) NOR does he have a reputation (at least not a good one!).

    And as for being sued – well if Brangelina started suing everyone out there who ever wrote made up shit about them then THEY wouldn`t have time for their respective careers left! By the way most of what tabloids or anyone else on the internet says is protected by the 1st Amendment (Free Speach) as long as it just reflects a personal opinion. That is not anything a lawyer could sue you for and win! By the way most tabloids avoid lawsuits by simply attributing their claims to “a source/friend” – who remains anonymous and could hardly be held responsible for his/her quote (especially since in some cases sources are just aliases created by tabloid staff members! )

    Anyway did you ever come across a site on the internet that was sued for anything other the the usual cease and desist thread (when posting unlawfully obtained “nude” photos? I certainly didn`t!

    Reply
  456. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @ Iluno – nope you are 100% wrong, I have no idea who you are and don’t recall ever talking to you before. You have been making sly little digs at me since yesterday and I rose above it and ignored you. You have told people that they have put something to me “respectfully” when they have spent the three or four previous posts ferociously abusing me. Did you bother to read them before you made your judgment? I have never “ripped” well apart but you chose to jump in and say she had been ripped apart on this board, clearly a dig at me again, following on from your comments yesterday. I responded to you as I have done to everyone else in a calm and reaonable manner, explaining myself for about the billionth time with all the patience I can manage and you respond with a bitchy put down along the lines of don’t waste your breath by responding in a lengthy post? See what you did there? Just the same thing you have been at pains to criticse in me when I have done my utmost to not attack others while being consistently attacked by them. And then your haste to differentiate me from Kate, why would you do that? Another common ploy. I dish it out when someone attacks me, other posters or Ian. I have every right to do that as everyone else does. And no that doesn’t mean its fair for a group of posters to attack me gang-style. We are not having a little “banter”, you are baiting me. That’s all. Nice try but I’m not biting. Sayanara.

    Reply
  457. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @ annabell – sorry, I need to try to use that reply function, I will do that next time x

    Reply
  458. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Keane, I mean you know harm. I was hoping you could read between the lines, see how other people may feel or interupt “things” (empathy) but you either don’t want to or can’t. That’s you. We are all individuals & that’s a damn good thing. I for one am for from perfect.

    Reply
  459. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    @Patty anne:

    Well spoken. I will do my very best to ignore the disruptive posters from here on out. I do, however, retain the right to be as snarky about AJ as I want to be!

    Reply
  460. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    @Keane:

    Don’t you just wish that Jen were using her sick days to be in Cannes and SHE be the ex he hooks up with tonight???

    Reply
  461. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    @Kate:
    Where are the pics of them kissing in a restaurant corner that you and sama are talking about? I posted you at 5:03 , but NOone is answering. I am feeling very invisible………..

    Reply
  462. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Keane:
    Oh gosh! Thank you! I’m not invisible after all…lol

    Reply
  463. karenab said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    @Kate:
    re the scarf – as soon as I saw it my first thought was it was a ‘Jen scarf’. Maybe Ange threatened him with death if he showed his necklace off again, so this was an ‘in her face’ way of complying but still getting the message across.

    Reply
  464. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    She looks absolutely NAKED in this photo! That dress all but disappears! I see Brad is holdling a drink. Guess she’s gonna fill his tank up with liquor before she empties it later? Bet Jolie dosen’t look half bad when Brad is half tanked and horny
    http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/87876844.jpg?v=1&c=NewsMaker&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19375C05EF07E24E8D68E6812264C75F88349AAE4E13EDE9114

    Reply
  465. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    @Keane:
    I have no idea if they do that here, I was just trying to think of somewhere to equal of the Pyramids. My other choice would have been Buckingham Palace, but I don’t think I’m on the Queen’s list of people to invite, LOL! And yeah, I would have trouble with cold too, I’m still acclimatizing to the weather here, and it’s not easy. Not much fun freezing your ass off at a ball. That would pretty much rule out anywhere outdoors here for me ;)
    Let’s see if this one works: [URL=http://img34.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img1796.jpg][IMG]http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/2328/img1796.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

    Reply
  466. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    @liuno:
    liuno, I know it appears that way, but that is because I really don’t care all that much. I just sort of let it go unless something catches me off guard and I find it offensive, then I will say something. I have let this drop for the most part because I basically went in circles with “well’ when she was “me’ and she posted some false information about Brad, that both I and Ian called her on. She left. When she came back as well it took me a bit to figure out whe was “me’ and so I asked her if she was, and she did apologize about the other information. That was a positive step imo. I really do not like all this tit for tat back in forth. I frankly think well should let all this drop and just take it up with IAN as I suggested, but she is using the board as therapy, and that was Keanes point.

    I do understand everyones opinion that want to support her, because we are nice people here, but at the same time, it does not seem genuine to me because she is not willing to get with IAN when he can in fact do to Jolie exactly what she wants done. Keane sees this as I do too, nice people being played, but if in fact well is an injured party, then by all means we would like to help her, so step forward and get on with it. What good does it do to go on and on and on week after week? If she is not genuine then she does indeed need some help from a good therapist because pretending all this is borderline, and if she is then she does as well. It is just time to let it go and leave it between “well and Ian” jmo, but thank you for your kind words. Believe me thought, lol, if you had seen the previous exchange you would understand why everyone says that Keane has the patience of a saint. I really do not when I have had enogugh. :)

    Reply
  467. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    Lol….thank you. Snarky in regard to Jolie is a good thing in my book@too curious:

    Reply
  468. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, I’m not baiting you or ripping on you. As I mentioned in the previous post I was making an attempt to see if you were willing to understand individuals have individual opinions which they are entitled to AND another person may not see it the same but they do respect that individuals right to have their opinion. Hence, when someone says you are ripping on them you say no I’m not and go into a lenthy post but when someone comes back to you ah then they are ripping on you. Do you understand what I’m getting at. It’s just my opinion that you come across as being a little one sided, yours. Not taking others feelings/opinions into consideration and or allowing them to their feelings.

    Reply
  469. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @Keane:

    Hmmm, my comment disappeared. Maybe it will show up shortly, I tried to post a link to a pic of the ball. Let’s see if it works this time…

    http://img34.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img1796.jpg

    Reply
  470. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    @annabell:
    I believe they are on the previous thead where they arrive in Cannes. try that.

    Reply
  471. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @Canuck:
    @Canuck:
    There it is, but the link didn’t work the first time.

    Reply
  472. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    @Canuck:
    bb14. Can you tell why would she wear padding she’s not preggers so what would be the reason????

    Reply
  473. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @ toni –

    Ian has written 8 books on celebs I believe, google him and find out.

    Celebs may not bother to sue for a lot of things, but i think you’ll find they will for stories of bestiality, incest and suggestions of inappropriate activity with children. AJ has already threatened to sue Ian and one of his sources if they talk about the threesomes they had with a HW actor, she e-mailed the source to tell her and the source e-mailed Ian straight away. Believe me celebs sue when the story is harmful to them and they think they can win. That whole celebs don’t have time to sue baloney is a myth created by celebs to explain why they don’t sue when the story is in fact true (David Beckham’s affair with Rebecca Loos is a case in point).

    Re tabloids and internet posters being protected by the first amendment I am afraid that is not true. I have checked out my legal position with both the police and a topnotch lawyer friend with regard to commenting here and they say it is a grey area. A commenter on ebay is currently being sued in the UK because the opinion he gave (and was asked to give) on a trader affected the trader’s business. Even if he wins he will still be liable for his own costs (tens of thousands of pounds). My lawyer friend advised me that if I wanted to continue commenting here I should write a disclaimer saying I in no way ally myself with the stories given. He said there is a possibility, albeit it remote that I could be sued. Tabloids are most definitely not protected by what you describe either. When they say a “source” said it is often the celeb[’s PR, when it isn’t they definitely do have a source who they will be able to go to court and say was legit and that they did due dilligence to check them out. They still may not win a libel case but they will at least have a fighting chance.

    So yeah, internet law is a new area but it is developing all the time. No one is immune from being sued, not Ian, not me, not you. That’s the current state of play anyway.

    Reply
  474. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    One thing toni. When Ian held his IUCTV program the 13th i belive, Paula (?) Page Six columnist was first guest speaker on the television screen. When a poster here asked a question of her about Angelina and her brother James, Paula’s response was, “I won’t discuss Angelina and her brother”, somone said then, “Why?”, Paula said, “I won’t get sued”. So it’s a fact that publications are in fear of Jolie Lawsuits. @toni:

    Reply
  475. CinDee said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    She probably through a fit that he didn’t mention her on the interview…threatened not to show up or do something else. Maybe she will make out with QT in front of everyone.
    @Kate:

    Reply
  476. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @Kate:
    You and Keane appear to have a good rapport perhaps you can explain my position to Keane better. I did not mean harm, she is entitled to her opinion. Just like everyone else, that’s all I tried getting across. I’ve enjoyed reading, despise Ange. Can’t say the same about Brad, made a lot of poor choices has screwed up his life and others.

    Reply
  477. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    I suppose that if she wanted to get a whole bunch of speculation going, that might be a good way to do so. Later, she could just say she was bloated or something, but only after a couple of weeks of tabloid frenzy. Plus, if Brad is actually seeing Jen or someone else, it puts that much more pressure on them to not be seen. “Poor AJ, he’s cheating on her while she’s maybe preggers”, or the like.

    Reply
  478. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @Keane:
    You forgot to hit the reply button…da*n you! Now I have to back and read what Toni wrote. Sh*t!..lol

    Reply
  479. SZ said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @Keane. Don’t ever mention my “name” again on this site in that stance. I am perhaps your one “mistake.” I sent my info to Ian. Please remain silent about me, as you are once again accusing me of being something that I am not. YOU have no proof, either, about me. Only your assumptions because I don’t “sound” like someone in what you call “my industry.” I gather you own the rights to the TV and/or publishing industry? You know a certain language that only TV and/or publishing people speak? One can only have one or two interesting careers? One cannot live in a nice neighborhood and not be rich? W/ me, at least, you are so far off the mark that I’m shocked you haven’t fallen off your chair/cliff.

    I truly don’t like this kind of thing that has begun between us, but I will not have you continue to publically tie me w/ those who very well may be either “loonies” or “plants.” Again, since you’re so very close to Ian, when he has time following Cannes, ask him if he heard from me. Then Google me. Then, if you’re willing to admit on a public post that you were in error about me, a decent energy may return.

    Reply
  480. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    @annabell:

    #
    sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    They were kissing yesterday
    See

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/brad-and-angie-k-i-s-s-i-n-g-t225308.html

    Reply
  481. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @ Ilumo – thanks for your opinion but what I’m saying is I think it is a very unfair one. I am bashed day after day on this blog by mutliple posters who come here to attack and abuse me in a personal way. At first I gave as good as I got but then I was accused of being a “bully”. So now I try to respond in a reasonable way and just absorb the abuse one day after the next, and yet you were giving applause to one of the people who abused me 4 or 5 times with no provocation from me and yet saying I was the perpetrator. That is totally unfair. You may have read back through the last few threads, but have your read over the last 3 or 4 months say? If you had maybe you will see what I am constantly on the receiving end of. I hate it when people jump in and assume that they know the lay of the land, who is and isn’t being fair when they haven’t been here evey day for the past 3 or 4 months. I don’t deserve the tag of “you cna’t handle someone with a different opinion” and its actually utter BS. Other opinions are fine, people who attack me, my cyber friends or Ian aren’t, neither are plants, frauds or people who are here simply to wind others up. If someone dishes it out to me then I have every right to give it back. You started this with me with no provocation from me. And BTW I really hate it when people talk about me rather than addressing things to me myself. If you have a view on me I would appreciate it if you would address it to me rather than making comments which are obviously directed at me towards other people. I have never come across you before and have no bone to pick with you. If you have one to pick with me I’d rather you said it to my face.

    Ok all, I’ve got to go, this has been a long old day for me. Catch you all tomorrow x

    Reply
  482. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Kate:
    bb14. In one of the photos she seems to be pulling her dress back to show her knobbly legs. Disgusting and gross.

    Reply
  483. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    @Keane:

    G’night Keane!

    Reply
  484. bluiznsmilez said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    Oh my goodness….was Chelsea just too funny or what on her take on Angelina! I laughed and laughed.

    Reply
  485. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    @His Highness
    @Ray Catone

    When we get to 500 posts can we have “s’more please”?

    Reply
  486. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @ SZ – perhaps I am wrong about you, I have never said I am always right and I have no absolute proof as you say. You began your comments by asking for us to be sympathetic to AJ, you directed comments at me and made comments with reference to me which had nothing whatsoever to do with me, said you had more privileged knowledge of what went on at the Globes, dismissed things that Ian said and said things about your career which did not ring true to me at all and seemed pretty unlikely. If I’m wrong about you then of course I will admit that and apologise for doubting what you say. This is not a personal vendetta and I mean no harm to you in a personal way. I am merely trying to protect the blog from the fakes who have been posting here all along and I’m sorry but I have had that suspicion about you. I will contact Ian and ask him for your info and do as you requested of course that is no problem and of course I will apologise if I am mistaken in my thoughts. The only issue is I’m not sure whether Ian will respond as I have asked him to pass on my e-mail to Kate before and to my knowledge that never happened. I hope I am wrong about you, I have never had a problem with you on a personal basis. I am just protective towards the blog and the things that are being said on it, it is not a personal attack. We’l just have to see what happens.

    Reply
  487. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @too curious:
    Thanks, my dear precious one. After looking at the photos they don’t seem that damaging. It looks like she is seeing if she gets a response from him…almost like saying so… Are you happy with where we are? You have caused this “split” and maybe seeing if he reacts even a little to her kiss… Maybe I get that from her body language. Kind of defiant,yet sad.

    Reply
  488. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    @Patty anne:

    Sure respected print medias can`t afford to print Ian`s outragious lies without fearing the consequences. Why else do you think that Intouch Weekly hasn`t published some of Ian`s claims even though the editor confirmed that he is reading this site on a daily basis? That does NOT mean however that what Intouch Weekly actually do print is true – it is just within the “confort zone” that will most likely keep the magazine out of any legal trouble!

    Reply
  489. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    @annabell:
    And she seems sad on the red carpet. But, maybe she is trying to make him feel guilty for hurting her. And nice guys always feel guilty. And she probably is sad in her sick way, but hopefully he will not try to placate her as he will be sucked right back in. She is manipulating him with this crying face, so sad demeanor…imo

    Reply
  490. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @annabell:

    Yeah, most of thought the kisses were crap, I mean it looks like she is mainly kissing him on the cheek and he seems sooooooo not interested. Also rampant curiosity if the necklace he is wearing is the one from Jen (also wondering if the scarf he wore in the Ann Curry interview this morning is Jen’s or a matching one).

    Reply
  491. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    @too curious:
    Since the scarf didn’t really “go” with his outfit , I would totally bet it was a sign to Jen that he was O.K. , not drinking, and thinking of her. Same with the necklace. He is sending her signs from what he is wearing as he know the photos will reach her. And probably his family also, so they know he is OK. jmo

    Reply
  492. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    @too curious:

    I hope Jen gets a guy who adores her and that she finds happines with and a family if that is what she wants
    she should stay far away from brad and the crazy life he has with it

    i think if they are getting back together she always has to put up with aj and her crazy fans

    Reply
  493. liuno said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    @Keane:
    Thanks for replying. I really meant know harm. If you think I was attacking you I’m sorry that was not my intent. I’ve been reading for about 2 1/2 – 3 months. Love it!!!! You get a lot of shit, more shit than you deserve but I did think at times you weren’t objective. Anyways I don’t believe or disbelieve well/me. She has stumbled over a few things.

    Reply
  494. Susanna said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    I noticed Brad had a gold ring on his finger at the premiere, but I didn’t see one on Angie Jo’s hand.

    Reply
  495. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    Nothing like a southern lady to put you in your place…..@Constant Gardner:

    Reply
  496. karenab said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    @liuno:
    I agree with you. I dont know if well is genuine or not, but seems pretty harmless. She said earlier she was mad as hell, people offered a sympathetic ear, but she said she didnt want to be ripped apart by Keane or anyone else. Keane responds with HOW MANY lengthy posts telling everyone that well isnt genuine, and isnt to be trusted, and her story is ludicrous, and is, in her opinion, just trying to get everyone off track. But IMO, the only person doing that is Keane. And yes, calling someone a liar and encouraging others to have nothing to do with them IS ripping them aprt.
    Another poster even apologised if she offended Keane by being nice to well – WTF ?!?!? Are we back in the bloody playground? You should be able to talk to anyone you like without feeling like you will be out of the cool club if you do.
    Someone else said when this happens, the original poster disappears and others spring up to defend them which is really dodgy! MAYBE some people just cant stand to see this happening, and have to speak up.
    I’ve said this before, I’m not getting at anyone in particular, honest, but there is a bit of an unwelcoming feel on here. Why should ANYONE have to prove themselves to another poster – its ridiculous. JMO

    Reply
  497. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    @annabell:

    but he is drinking and he is kissing aj

    so if jen sees this what will she think of that, i mean the kissing in the corner from the restaurant…

    i really think that bp and aj are together and all this was for PUBLICITY

    If you think of it, in all the magazines where writing bp and jen together again, now cannes with aj and who gets the bad publicity jen and noone else because everyone is writing about the kissing etc. etc. and jen stands alone AGAIN AND AGAIN

    If they are not getting back together jen should really give a interview that she has nothing to do with brad and his family and that they are not getting back together ever

    Reply
  498. Astro said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    My goodness…I came back from work….What’s new?.

    I found this picture.
    http://www.okmagazine.com/pixandvids/gallery/14152/1/Hot-Shots!.

    I don’t like it!

    Reply
  499. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @sama:
    Where do you see him drinking? I see a glass of water in his hand after walking the red carpet. I see no wine glasses..???

    Reply
  500. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    @annabell:

    he is sitting at a table with champagne, it is in the other thread i believe

    Reply
  501. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    @Keane:

    See maybe that is why Ian is hiding “in a remote location” as he claimed so that he couldn`t officially receive an order to appear before court.

    By the way you still haven`t adressed my question about why it makes you mad when other posters question Ian and his “sources”. Because wether you believe it or not there were many stories in gossip mags over the years that have proven to be wrong (like the STAR story about Jen`s adoption) and all of these false stories were based on sources!

    - I will believe Ian`s claims about bestiality the minute he posts a real tape showing Jolie and a dog “in the act”. But to this day Ian hasn`t come up with it nor did he come up with proof for any other story he put out there! And sorry but if you are convinced that everything Ian posts is always 100% trues then you won`t need a disclaimer because truth is the sole and only defence against a defamation lawsuit!

    - By the way did I mention that many celebs simply don`t sue because a lawsuit would only make the very gossip that they try to fight available to a far bigger mainstream audiance?

    Reply
  502. HisHighness said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    @all – I want to take an IUC poll – do you think Angie and Brad will be together one year from now? let us know. I vote definitely NO.

    Reply
  503. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    @annabell:
    and the kiss looks pretty lame. She is trying to get a response from him to see if she can “reach” him like she used to. Doesn’t look like it to me! He is standing firm…

    @Astro:
    She is trying to look vulnerable to Brad and get him feeling sorry for her and get him back into her control. This is fake and a ploy to get him back. BUT, I don’t think it is working. He is OVER it and if he does not drink , he will be strong….I hope..

    Reply
  504. cuze said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @HisHighness:
    No way!

    Reply
  505. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @HisHighness:
    I vote NO! If he remains strong at Cannes here, he will not fall….

    Reply
  506. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @HisHighness:

    i vote yes they will be together (it doesn’t matter to me if they are splitting up or not by the way)

    Reply
  507. bluiznsmilez said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    @sama:
    it’s perrier, not champagne.

    Reply
  508. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @annabell:
    and one year from now, her name will be toast in HW, and he will be doing roles like an older Robert Redford. WITH his company with Jen back in business!

    Reply
  509. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @karenab:

    Are referring to my post as the one apologizing to Keane? I wasn’t apologizing for being nice to Well. And if I were why would that concern you? In fact, I had explained a general philosophy of mine but because the written word can so easily be read with a context not intended by the author, I then wrote a post to Keane to make sure she knew I did not intend anything negative toward her and indeed appreciate her concern for fellow regulars on the board (I’ve only been here since early April but have been pretty regular since then). As for being on the playground and wanting to be part of the cool club – please don’t think you are speaking for me in that case, I have never had a problem being myself.

    Can we just chill and get back to what’s REALLY IMPORTANT – being snarky and sarcastic about AJ & BP?? LOL

    Reply
  510. bluiznsmilez said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @HisHighness: Yes. I think it will take a while for him to unravel himself. The today show interview sounded like he was not happy –but rather focused and on track. We’ll see.

    Reply
  511. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    @sama:

    Infact i hope they will stay together and be miserable and that jen finds somebody who she is happy with

    Reply
  512. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Hell NO! Please. I may have to withdraw from reading any/all mainstream media if those two are still together!

    Reply
  513. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @bluiznsmilez:
    I think he has been “unraveling” for awhile now. If he has support and stays strong , he will NOT go back to AJ. He is breaking her hold over him. He just needs a LOT of support…

    Reply
  514. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @HisHighness:

    And thanks for checking in with us, I’m sure you have had a looooooooooong day!

    Reply
  515. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    I also vote NO, they’ll not be a couple…….@HisHighness:

    Reply
  516. toni said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Why would you need a poll since you already claimed that they broke up a while ago (and threaten eachother with restraining orders and private investors!) and since your devoted followers would never dare to question you anyway even if their very lives depended on it? Bwahhaha. Make up your mind for once!

    Reply
  517. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @too curious:
    @HisHighness:

    Yes! Give us something juicy other than QT loving feet because that was just plain gross. C’mon…give it up. PS. Barely anyone is on at this time for some weird reason so we won’t tell…….it will be our secret…just an up and coming scoop …just for us…we won’t tell….lol

    Reply
  518. bluiznsmilez said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    @sama: I’m with you. I hope they stay together. And Jen lives her life as SHE wants–with or WITHOUT a man.
    I hope Brad is happy being a Dad, and I couldn’t care less about AJ.

    Reply
  519. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    @TobyKat:
    The are parked right at the front window and Brad looks over to ask them to stop filming. What a joke.
    If he is seeing Jennifer Aniston, Ms. Aniston will be happy to see these photos and videos. It’s clear he can’t stand Angie anymore. It’s that look of contempt that only a spouse on the outs can give.

    Reply
  520. annabell said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    @pickwick:
    That’s last years video. HH wants to know your thoughts….

    Reply
  521. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    @HisHighness:
    I’ve been through a marriage as it was breaking up. There is a look a spouse gets when they are over you—almost nobody else in your life will ever look at you the same way. The sight of you and the sound of you annoy them. They are blaming everything wrong on you–whether you deserve it or not. They absolutely hate you.
    I recognize that look and it’s all over Brad’s face.
    No way will they ever get back together.
    I would have been more open to the idea that they could until the video and photos from Cannes.
    Anyway, that’s my vote and it’s based on my background.

    Reply
  522. pickwick said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    Look at her tummy in this one:
    http://www.okmagazine.com/pixandvids/gallery/14356/2

    Reply
  523. pickwick said on May 20th,