Sugar Ray Ramone Catone (The Bronx Bi-Blogger) – Jolie/Bruni Two Peas in a Pod

Posted on May 19th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Memory of a confession…regarded Brad as a piece of clay…same way Carla regards Nick…really jealous about men…protective instincts out the window…Carla and Angie both bang politicians…both banged Mick…one red shoe, one black shoe…legally give up children…addicted every day to pharmaceuticals…the great depression, Carla and Ange…conjured up fantasies together…not in the kitchen washing dishes…no Prez, no Pitt in sight…Freudian assumptions…female attention to satisfy their neediness…overly grateful…putting powder on their faces…drinking whisky like its 1999…each other’s servants…private dances with the still-loyal…wilderness wild…legs apart, grating…flamenco dance, no panties underneath…abstract treatises…hold each other like a baby doll…the first cut is the deepest…similar hard realities…tired of the burden…both suffered from neglect in childhood…both posed at Cannes like Oscar winners…fantasy identity…heroin, gambling, flaring tempered bitches and spousal abuse…meet the Bruni-Jolie-Sarkozy-Pitts!

  1. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    Wow. Wow. Need to look up more on Carla – don’t know a lot of her story.

    Reply
  2. backalleyknees said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    H8TERS!!!!!

    Reply
  3. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    Where are the IUC ‘professional’ posters? I’m no good at riddles!!!

    Reply
  4. backalleyknees said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    I have to say that angie looks pretty bangable in that lower photo.

    Reply
  5. Different Guest said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    @backalleyknees:How many years ago was it taken? Did Carla Bruni give up custody of a child or two? I’m vaguely remembering something when she started banging Szarkozy.

    Reply
  6. backalleyknees said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

    So they hooked up as well huh? That doesn’t surprise me at all. Bruni has a very twisted sexual past (in regards to her partners) and is completely trying to reinvent herself as the French Jackie O. What a farce. They are both into maleable men who they can change to their liking. Pretty pathetic.

    Reply
  7. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @too curious:Carla: comes from a very rich italian family. was a highly successful fashion model. used to date Mick Jagger. had a long lasting affair with him while he was playing house with Jerry Hall. Jerry and her actually went at it and had a blowout fight, Carla kept seeing Mick. always dated in the jet set. usual supermodel behaviour behind closed doors. champagne and coke ( or heroin) take your pick -diet of the ubermodels of the 90’s. tried to become famous as a pop singer. didn’t work. finagled her way into becoming the ‘first lady’ of France.

    Reply
  8. backalleyknees said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Not sure, but I saw it the other day again. Can’t remember if it was on this site or not. The only thing I know about her child is that his name is Aurelien and she made him with her lover(can’t remember the name) who she met through her boyfriend at the time, who was actually her babydaddy’s daddy in real life. Kinda screwy. Oh and Bruni is extremely possesive and jealous. She had one of Sarko’s MP’s removed from her position and sent to Belgium. They say she put Sarko up to this because she has such a dislike for the other woman. Other woman is of Algerian descent, but I don’t know her name off the top of my head.

    Reply
  9. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    @harikari girl:
    I see. I knew she had a bit of a “past” as they say. lol

    One thing about us here in the States, we seem to prefer our politicians/spouses to lie and claim to be angels…ooooooohhhhhh, now I get why AJ figures she is a shoe-in for politics!!

    Reply
  10. backalleyknees said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    @harikari girl:
    she called Jerry “bourgeouisie and without class” as I remember. She is another man eater. Way to use your feminine wiles bitches.

    Reply
  11. Different Guest said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @backalleyknees:I wonder who has custody of the kid? Bruni doesn’t strike me as the maternal type. Am hoping Sugar Ray is indicating that AJ has given up custody.

    Reply
  12. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Oh yuck – forgot she dated Donald Trump. was disgusted when I saw them at a party together in New York. think she also dated Eric Clapton but not sure.

    Reply
  13. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    She slept with the son of her lover, and had a child with him. The Minister who was removed was Rachida Dati, who recently had a baby and refused to name the father. Some have speculated that it was Sarkozy.

    Reply
  14. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    @backalleyknees: Ironic – she’s screwing a man who was with his partner for 22 years and had children together and she calls his common law wife the one “without class”? Note to Carla: wealthy parents do not automatically mean you’re classy.

    Reply
  15. cuze said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    hold each other like baby dolls…the first cut is the deepest. Does this mean they had a suicide pact or something? I’m not seeing the significance of this post other than they have a lot in common apparently.

    Reply
  16. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    Sarkozy (as a Mayor of his “town”) actually performed the marriage ceremony for his first wife Cecilia (that is apparently when they first met). Later, they ended up together. She and Carla look relatively similar, with about 10 years or so age difference. They split, the first wife called him a “skirt chaser”, they got back together for the elections and then split again shortly after he was elected. Rumour has it that while they were split and he was spending his holidays with some of his show-biz friends in Corsica, he would show up at the local beach restaurant with a couple of blondes for lunch. Rumour also has it that he went down there with with a lady friend while he was still married, and the local “fat cat” politician who usually had him stay at his house was obliged to send he and the lady friend to a hotel due to the local customs and the political fallout that could have ensued for the local politician. It was also speculated that they would probably only remain married long enough to get him through the Presidency, and that she would dump him after that. I guess that remains to be seen, when that day arrives.

    Reply
  17. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    @cuze:
    AJ was a cutter. Could SR be inferring Carla was into cutting or self-mutilation also?

    Reply
  18. cuze said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    @harikari girl:
    Yeah, I thought about that also but then it goes on to say…tired of the burden. Which made me think of the alleged suicide attempt on the other post. But yeah, sure it can very well mean that. IMO.

    Reply
  19. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    @harikari girl:“each other’s servants” – a reference to S&M? Might reinforce the thought that they both were cutters or got off on the pain.

    Reply
  20. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    First cut is the deepest; it could refer to the Cat Stevens song OR to self cutting. Not sure how the lyrics fit except “when it comes to being loved she’s first” makes me think of AJ’s self love and narcissism. Lyrics:

    I would have given you all of my heart
    but there’s someone who’s torn it apart
    and she’s taken almost all that I’ve got
    but if you want, I’ll try to love again
    baby I’ll try to love again but I know

    The first cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The first cut is the deepest
    ’cause when it comes to being lucky she’s cursed
    when it comes to lovin’ me she’s worst
    but when it comes to being loved she’s first
    that’s how I know

    The first cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The first cut is the deepest

    I still want you by my side
    just to help me dry the tears that I’ve cried
    cause I’m sure gonna give you a try
    and if you want, I’ll try to love again
    but baby, I’ll try to love again, but I know

    The first cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The first cut is the deepest

    ‘Cause when it comes to being lucky she’s cursed
    when it comes to lovin’ me she’s worst
    but when it comes to being loved she’s first
    that’s how I know

    The first cut is the deepest, baby I know
    The first cut is the deepest

    Reply
  21. Kate said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    Both whores, something we all have commented on now for several months. Angelina is the CB of the US. I am sure everyone sees where she gets her inspiration from now.

    Reply
  22. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    Ok, so both Carla and AJ view their men as being something they could mold, influence. They are both jealous of the male friends of their men, as they fear their own influence might be diluted. The rest of the first bit is self evident. They screw politicians, they both screwed M Jagger, they both gave up custody (let this be true in the case of AJ pls), both are taking drugs for depression?

    Reply
  23. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    “abstract treatises” – that really has me stumped.

    Reply
  24. cuze said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    This definitely piques my curiosity about the kids. Which ones did she give up and where are they?

    Reply
  25. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    treatise:

    1) A treatise is a formal, lengthy, systematic discourse on some subject.

    2 )Treatises are books that attempt to cover an entire area of the law. Usually written by legal experts, they do not, however, have any legal authority in a court of law.

    3) a formal and systematic statement in writing of the principles of a subject, generally longer and more detailed than an essay but shorter than a book.

    Reply
  26. Astro said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    Angie and Brad….Tomorrow…The big picture.!!!!

    Reply
  27. stinky-inky said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    JJ has pix of the couple eating dinner at Cannes. He looks so sad. She shovels the food like a pig. Definitely not Midwestern table manners. jmo.

    Reply
  28. HisHighness said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    @Astro:
    I predicted she’d be posing by his side for the best photo op of her life. I also predict and know that they’re finito amigo.

    Reply
  29. Astro said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    The true at last: Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt Arrive Together at Cannes!

    http://www.popsugar.com/3170503?page=0,0,2

    Tomorrow the tons of love at the red carpet.juhuuuuu!!!.

    Reply
  30. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Yay!!!

    And we bow to your knowledge of the Annointed Ones! I mean, former Annointed Ones :)

    Reply
  31. Astro said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:01 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Come on friend…don’t justify the mistakes of all these posts during the last 02 or 03 months. I will predict the same…I predict that Brangie will be apart, yes they will be apart by Dec-2020. Happy with my prediction?

    Since they are a couple everybody says ths same, journalist, psychics…Listen they will be apart when everybody doesn’t pay attention to them. Do you want to see their break-up?…Ok…The answer: Don’t pay attention to them.

    Take care. Te amo muchisimo….hasta la vista bebe.

    In fact, to tell you the true I don’t like Angelina Jolie…but here the facts.

    Reply
  32. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    @CC:
    Her smugness and him in that same damn shirt!!! Wait, maybe he has multiples of the same shirt so it is harder for the casual observer to figure out when he was where. Nah, probably just wears it until it spontaneously catches on fire to avoid being next to his stinky body :)

    Reply
  33. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    WOW! Just read this one! Yikes – got to look up the famous Carla ….. thanks Sugar – this will keep us busy for some time… :D

    Reply
  34. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    @HisHighness:
    YIPPEE TO HIGHNESS – sock it to them Ian! We love you … :-)

    Reply
  35. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    Dang! I’ve got chores to do! But will be back pronto! Love you Sugar – you get my adrenaline flowing thats for sure – ha ha – :D

    Reply
  36. BigApplette said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    Memory of a confession… someone told about AJ and CB together.
    regarded Brad as a piece of clay…Somone AJ can boss around and do her bidding
    same way Carla regards Nick… Somone CB can boss around and do her bidding
    really jealous about men…AJ sees men as a threat b/c they may talk “sense” into BP.
    protective instincts out the window…AJ and CB aren’t that concerned about their kids
    Carla and Angie both bang politicians… CB = NS and AJ supposedly WJC and probably many more
    both banged Mick…obvious
    one red shoe, one black shoe… They swapped shoes,
    legally give up children…CB had a son. Where is he. Did AJ concede kids due to what BP knows about and has on AJ?
    addicted every day to pharmaceuticals…AJ = methadone? CB?
    the great depression, Carla and Ange… Both suffer from depression.
    Conjured up fantasies together… sounds like sexual fantasies
    not in the kitchen washing dishes… Neither woman is a typical housewife type
    no Prez, no Pitt in sight… AJ and CB screw around when their partners are not around
    Freudian assumptions… oral fixation?
    female attention to satisfy their neediness… Both women like women
    overly grateful…putting powder on their faces…drinking whisky like its 1999…each other’s servants… AJ and CB partying together. S&M play. Maybe they were both DOMs.
    private dances with the still-loyal… AJ an CB’s lovers who were DOMs and had loyal servant types.
    wilderness wild…
    legs apart, grating…flamenco dance, no panties underneath… partying and sex outdoors.
    abstract treatises…
    hold each other like a baby doll… taking the place of a true baby?
    the first cut is the deepest… losing the first child is the hardest? C-section? Cutting for sexual arousal?
    similar hard realities… Both have issues with custody?
    tired of the burden… Burden of life? Burden of children? Burden of a committed relationship?
    both suffered from neglect in childhood… obvious
    both posed at Cannes like Oscar winners… They both act like the Queen of Sheba.
    fantasy identity… Jolie = international policy influencer, Bruni = international policy influencer
    heroin, gambling, flaring tempered bitches and spousal abuse… obvious
    meet the Bruni-Jolie-Sarkozy-Pitts! Same types of relationship with each couple.

    Reply
  37. rehab said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    Been reading SRs for awhile and i have to say its easier to understand while a little intoxicated :P
    This ones abit more straight forward than the other SR offerings, it doesnt surprise me that carla and succubus are linked and connected in personality. They went for the same type of man, they are power hungry and cunning, both got their way. Wouldnt be shocked if something sapphic went down.

    I am just in awe of how idoitic brad is to put children and himself through her games, why would he put himself through utter hell for publicity value when magazines and papers alike are turning theiir backs on them, ian meantioned the sex was that good, but how far could that go in a dieing/dead relationship.

    Reply
  38. tikki said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    @CC:
    Her face looks streched – not much skin left, huh? It’s the Madonna smile – keeps the look human.
    Hague, Ferragamo? Angie goes european – above!
    She will leave as she entered – juicy sweet, decent and with a little distance.
    Cannes is going to be their hub – what a noble agreement.

    And Sugar Ray: For you they may seem similar, but Jagger himself has had women of classes miles apart.

    Reply
  39. pickwick said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    Carla Bruni is very wild. I first read about her when she dated Eric Clapton. There was a piece in Vanity Fair. It’s funny to see her in those little hats and little lady coats now.

    Anyway, clearly the puzzle is suggesting that Bruni and Jolie had something going on. That’s pretty easy to believe. Not sure I believe the politician stuff. I know the suggestion is Clinton, but there was also a hint about Obama earlier and I know Obama wouldn’t be that stupid.

    Reply
  40. joanne said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    @CC:
    What does she do, send the pictures to just jared herself? He got it quick enough and that can explain the loon mentaility of that site.

    Reply
  41. Ani said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    2 things…

    1st. BP is still wearing the necklace in the pictures at dinner. hmm…

    2nd. regarded Brad as a piece of clay…
    same way Carla regards Nick…
    makes me think that AJ/CB thought the boys could be molded into whatever they desired.
    just my 2 cents. imho.

    Reply
  42. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    @BigApplette:
    @rehab:
    Hello – just wanted to thank you for deciphering that ( I am a bit thick it seems! ) although I will try to become intoxicated for the next one! lol. Thought you might also be interested to know that Aussie Womans Day stated that AJ and BP were apart on Mothers Day cos she doesnt like his mum. Doesnt sound like a happy family to me. I would not be surprised if they show up arm in arm posing on the red carpet – after all AJ is a master at manipulation ( mmm so is CB come to think of it) as for the flamenco dance – eww!! lol. Anyway hope everyone is well.

    Reply
  43. BigApplette said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    @MickeyB:
    De nada, amigo. One other thing I didn’t add to the Sugar Ray Jumble is that during the movie “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” there was a scene where AJ and BP did a tango dance and supposedly AJ never wore undies while she was filming the movie even when she was supposed to wear a body stocking for the sex scenes.

    Reply
  44. Kate said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    @HisHighness:
    LOL I wondered how patient you were going to be. You deserve a medal IAN!

    Reply
  45. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    “Freudian assumptions: – gosh, could mean a lot of things. Here are some ideas: Fred believed that (1) All humans are motivated by sex which starts in infancy – baby boy wants mom and resents dad and vice versa; (2) all women have penis-envy; (3) dreams are the royal road to understanding the unconscious; (4) cocaine was to be prescribed – which he did and he used it himself; (5) feelings of incest were natural. Thats all I can recall right now. Yikes. :-)

    Reply
  46. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:32 pm

    @BigApplette:
    I heard that too! and she wonders why so many women dislike her? eww!! she always has to have what she cant have and doesnt care who she hurts. A real woman uses her mind not whats between her legs to seduce a man. Any decent woman does not chase after another womans man out of respect. Lets face it why tempt bad karma? as the saying goes what goes around comes around. Hope her you know what goes mouldy and closes up for good! then may she implode from fluid retention! lol x x x x

    Reply
  47. Kate said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    @Astro:
    Okay..now, Astro, you are saying you do not even like Angelina Jolie lol, say what? Did you not tell me not even a month ago how this was your romantic fantasy couple, how much you admired them, yada yada yada. I gotta say here little Astro, your response to IAN sounds a bit of a smart ass if I might say, why the chip on your shoulder, do you have stock in this Brand ? For weeks you post every article you can find on them together and you are upset because IAN tells you flat out they are finished. He has been saying this for 3 months and you have refused to listen, but because he addressed you personally suddenly you are realizing, ahhh, he is telling me the truth and you are upset. Don’t be so pissy, you knew it was coming, now if you really do not like Angelina, apologize for being a brat to HH and come and play with us. Cheers! Kate

    Reply
  48. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Sorry but I confess I started giggling when I saw the typo “Fred believed…”

    ok, I’m about 5 years old mentally, but just imagining some guy named Fred spouting this stuff…”Well, dang, all wimmen have penis envy, dinjit know that?”

    Sorry, it IS good info and I AM being a child.

    Reply
  49. Kate said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    @pickwick:
    Do you remember when she dated Vincent Perez?

    Reply
  50. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    @Astro:
    Hi R’astro.

    Reply
  51. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    Flamenco dance – from what I just read, the heritage is Spanish Gypsy and the dance itself is not choreographed but is spontaneous depending on the dancer’s rhythem and clapping.

    Reply
  52. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    That’s what she was going for.

    Reply
  53. rehab said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:45 pm

    @BigApplette:
    My god that woman is just one giant walking STD!

    One thing that im stuck on with this SR post is the Freudian assumptions, im a big psychology nut so i would like to see peoples take on that. I read that carla used to/still does see a therapist at afew times a week. Theres many issues going on with her clearly, if you can so easily be compared to AJ you know you need help!

    Reply
  54. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    @too curious:
    Good catch!! Dang, I have a neighbor named Fred! Yikes, I better watch out! :P

    Reply
  55. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Sorry I promise to try and act grown up for…at least the next 10 minutes or so :)

    No offense to anyone named Fred it’s just a nice, normal guy kind of name, you know?

    Reply
  56. Sheriffe said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

    Guys, this part here:

    legally give up children

    I don’t think this refers to custody. I think this refers to abortion / termination.

    Reply
  57. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:56 pm

    @Sheriffe:

    Oh, good catch!

    Reply
  58. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:56 pm

    Re Freud Assumptions: I think he also said that depression results from repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse and he tried to unlock these memories with some type of re-enactment of such events (are back to talking about the diaper incidents?) Anyway, psych majors – go for it and tear me apart! :P

    Reply
  59. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    @Sheriffe:
    Thats good – I like that in light of the evil Ms. Jolie’s at least one alleged and maybe more abortions – what about the also evil Ms. Bruni – I’m betting they are in her past as well! :P

    Reply
  60. Kate said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    @Ani:
    Ani, I think Brad is making a statement by wearing that necklace. He makes his arrival with Jolie wearing the necklace in full view knowing that everyone can see it and that everyone will know he has it on as a nod to Jen. Only the idiot loons will not understand that he is using this as a message to the masses just as Jen is when she says things like “I could not wait to get to work each day” just a few weeks ago when promoting Management , or ordering her Loco chicken and sucking and licking the bone, lol, as Canuck said, the girl had to be laughing her ass off when she leaked that. Comic genius. I bet she is having a ball with this.

    When Jen and CC did the kiss for Dirt they released all kinds of leaks to stir up the masses and sat back and laughed, she talked about how funny it was later to see everyone get so worked up over it all the while they knew how much a do about nothing it was. You can bet she is doing the same here, as Brad is. Any man that is devoted to his wife, mother of six is not going to wear a necklace given to him by his ex in full view, at Cannes no less, after if was front page news, after mommy tried to kill her self, na huh, nope. He hates be stuck there with Elvira and is telling the world that he does. I am not saying he and Jen are back together, well says they are 3/4 there, (I tend to agree) they could just be in cahoots with him out of this hell hole, but he is definitely not there in mind and spirit with Angelina Jolie. I can only dare to laugh if Lainey suggest there is Pitt Porn.

    The good thing is that IAN has spies and we will get the real scoop, the bad thing I can not invade her f**king Twitter page and post what it is to HER!

    lmao Go IAN!

    Reply
  61. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    red shoe, one black shoe…being part of two worlds? not just being bisexual…oh, maybe referring to being polygamous or polyandrous?? multiple spouses? or is there a term for having spouses of both genders? I found a quote where Carla favors it over monogamy, and we’ve heard that AJ may be married to more than one person…

    Reply
  62. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    @too curious:

    oops, ONE red shoe, one black shoe…

    Reply
  63. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    One red shoe – one black shoe: In 1972 there was a funny french spy movie called The Tall Blonde Man with One Black Shoe – saw it and liked it but dont really remember what it was about – then in 1985 there was another movie (American?) modeled after it called The Man WIth One Red Shoe. Will try to find out more info unless other posters know about these movies. :P

    Reply
  64. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    @ladybert62:

    good catch…have heard of the movies, may have seen one black shoe a looooooooooong time ago.

    Reply
  65. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    Night all…need to clear my head of La Jolie before I can get some sleep.

    Ian and Sugar, keep the scoops coming, and hugs and kisses for all you’ve done so far!

    Reply
  66. ani said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    @Kate:

    i just felt for a man who is obviously putting on a farce for “the brand” that it was a very brazen move. i do hope ja is laughing in her hotel room! :) jmo.

    Reply
  67. Sheriffe said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    @ladybert62:
    From what I’ve read, Ms Bruni’s vajayjay is a revolving door. Unless she had an IUD or surgical sterlisation at the beginning of her career, I find it difficult to believe she lasted as long as she did without at least one accidental pregnancy!

    Reply
  68. Antipodean said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    @Canuck:

    What is potentially the scariest aspect of the telegraph article is the power and influence Carla seems to have over his political decisions. But who knows – he has been known to be extremely right wing in the past, perhaps a good influence?

    My question is: why the prolonged chick bashing on this site. Sure I’m not a fan of Angie by any means. I think she’s done more for the international baby smuggling market than anyone bar those rabid, frothing vessels of vacuousness Madonna, Deborah Lee Furness and hugh Jackass (Sir Robert Helpmann in Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, anyone?) But seriously, why do the blokes never cop it – ever (here and in other trashy sites/mags?!) Perhaps consider a name change: misogynyundercover.com ?

    Reply
  69. Turkana said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    When are you people going to come to your senses. Poor things were praying that she doesn’t show up so they can be justified that they are breaking up, now that they see they are their together like there was any doubt! you say it’s for show…show for what? oh yeah what happened to that restraining order that she had on Brad? These so called sources didn’t know where she was!!

    Reply
  70. who cares? said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    Do these people really define their entire lives by sex, drugs, power and money? How boring — and sad. AJ is cunning — but her looks are waning fast and she’s yesterdays news. Gosh knows she’s too stupid to handle a real job, especailly if it doesn’t require her to f**k every man, woman and child in sight or include many photo ops of her big pouty lips. She’s horrible — and so is that idiot she’s shagging. BP can’t string a cogent sentence. They’re made for one another. Why does anyone care about these pathetic people? They have no virtue — none — nada — zip. What they do isn’t “art” for crissakes. It’s commmerce. They are the subprime lenders of the arts and entertainment marketplace. They make huge profits from stupid people. Yuck. One of the earlier bloggers said it best — if you stop paying them attention they’ll leave us alone.

    Reply
  71. justhelping said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    Here are some thoughts. Could there be a possibility that AJ and CB ran into each other before? When was she with MJ (CB)? Did the two ladies cross paths at that time? One red shoe, one black shoe. Red (cherry) AJ and the black shoe is the more experienced women.
    If AJ and CB got together, they were probably like, no you are beautiful, no you are beautiful, no wait I am beautiful fuck you.lol No, they must have felt an intense bond where they discussed their lives and then maybe exchanged blood. lol

    Reply
  72. justhelping said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    wow. so i guess a piece of shit mother should get a pass because she is a woman. bullshit. don’t play that card.@Antipodean:

    Reply
  73. justhelping said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    Hey Constant Gardener. Have you read about Ida-The Missing-Link?

    Reply
  74. TobyKat said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    @too curious:
    40 year-old former model and singer Carla Bruni Sarkozy made headlines around the world when she married divorced French president Nicolas Sarkozy, 53, in February after a whirlwind womance. She’s a controversial figure and once had an affair with the married son of her boyfriend at the time. The son’s wife is a novelist and wrote a book inspired by her husband’s infidelity in which she described the other woman as “a praying mantis.” Carla has had relationships with Mick Jagger, Eric Clapton, and Donald Trump and has said that she quickly tires of monogamy and prefers “polygamy.” [details from Wikipedia]
    http://www.celebitchy.com/13065/french_first_lady_carla_bruni_sarkozy_negative_gossip_about_me_is_part_of_my_job/

    Reply
  75. TobyKat said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    @Kate:
    They both are reading from the same script. Both characters have a wild, dicey past. Both characters are full of themselves and think nothing of swiping someones elses husband. They both grabbed on to men that could help change their image. AJ struck gold with the golden boy of hollywood and Carla struck gold
    with the president of France. Very calculated moves in my opinion. But the bigger you are the harder you fall. BOOM! Every dog has its day and their day will come.

    Reply
  76. I'm on the bidet said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    Hey, Angelina Jolie! That’s not how you are supposed to sit in that chair, you stupid broad!

    Reply
  77. harikari girl said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    @Antipodean: So let me get this straight – this is a misogynistic site because 2 women are called into question for their behaviour??? That’s a really long stretch. If women on this site are responding negatively to these 2, I think it’s because most of the female posters here would not be inclined to screw over another woman or get in the middle of an ongoing domestic partnership between two people. That’s called sisterhood or girl power NOT misogyny.

    Reply
  78. N'other Name said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    @TobyKat:
    @Kate:
    Hey you guys! I’m just catching up here! Was on the last post going thru 300 plus posts. OMG!!

    Kate, anyway, glad to see you back! I think we all missed ya’!! Always love to see your posts and Keane’s!

    TobyKat – I was SHOCKED when Sarkozy ended up w/ C. Bruni!!! Wow, just goes to show that men think with something much other than women do. How long do you think this one will last??

    Cannot undersand ’stupid’ men (and, trust me, I do believe there are savvy men out there that wouldn’t fall for that sh*t.) One example of an idiot is, now, Mel Gibson! How many times has that biyatch ‘milked’ any guy that she could?? Yeah, Mel, you are SUCH a Catholic! I can’t get into what a mess that guy is right now, ’cause I really feel for his 7 children and his estranged wife Robyn. Don’t get me started on this one!

    Yeah, CB & AJ are users to the end!

    Reply
  79. Kate said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    Legally gave up children normally someone put their baby up for adoption, or that they gave up all parental rights, not that they just gave up custody, but gave them up completely.

    Reply
  80. Vittorio said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    @pickwick:
    I was a little ill and unbelieving when WJC was first brought up, but now that I know more, it makes sense. She has a connectino to Steven Bing and he is one of his buddies. I remember reading about it in a Vanity Fair article last summer link herewith).
    http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/07/clinton200807

    Reply
  81. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:13 am

    bb14. God, they didn’t look too happy getting out of the car, I really didn’t think that she would have the gall to turn up and put on a front for everybody when they all know it is a farce. Good on him for wearing the necklace I think to that it sends a message to Jen.

    Reply
  82. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:33 am

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Wow, I’m really missing something here! What car are they getting out of?? Listen, I’m behind the 8 ball here ’cause I got home late from work and I was stuck on the last post and cannot, possilbly, read all posts listed. Where did you see that?? Much appreciated!!

    Reply
  83. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:38 am

    So besides the fact that they are lovers, drug addicts, manipulators, whores, users, jealous violent bitches that seek to be in high places by f**king poltitians, they re both tired of having to being held to the role they have to play, what else is SR telling us, we pretty much knew all this, except that they were lovers, but seriously does that really matter? Who hasn’t she slept with? I have always thought Jolie and Bruni were cut from the same cookie cutter, someone on here got upset with me about a month ago when I said that. So what is SR really telling us? What is the real reveal here? Did Angelina put a baby up for adoption, did she sign away all parental rights for her children, did Bruni? Is this linked to the fight that led to the suicide note? Is that part of the confession?

    Brad is being pretty brazen in all this imo, so in that respect it leads me to believe he has the goods on her, and they were enough to make her contemplate suicide because she knew she had no way out but to do what he wants. Just makes sense to me that she is there in Cannes because he told her to be, she is following orders, he is callling the shots, and this is their last red carpet, kaput, wrapping it all up with Cannes as their final bow.

    JMO

    Reply
  84. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:43 am

    @N’other Name:
    There are some pics of them arriving and each getting out of a car, opposite sides, he has on that same shirt, and wearing the necklace that Jen gave him. I believe it is linked on the previous thread.

    Reply
  85. topbrit said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:47 am

    @ et al – has anybody got a link to the pics at dinner where you can see pitts necklace,can’t seem to find it,thanks in advance.
    @ Sugar Ray – thank you for the wonderful much appreciated hard work!

    Reply
  86. Sheriffe said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:48 am

    @Kate:
    What you said earlier about giving up children for adoption was interesting. I wonder if a teenaged Angelina did that? I guess it would be too hard to find out whether she was hidden away for a period of several months. Angelina is only a year or so older than me, so thinking back to when I was 14 or so, terminations were still very rare (or at least a lot more difficult to organise than they are these days, from what I hear), and a shocked and isolated teenager might not a) realise she’s even pregnant; b) feel able to tell a responsible adult, till after the ’safe’ period is over and a termination is refused anyway.

    Reply
  87. cuze said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:49 am

    @Kate:
    I tend to agree with you about Brad having something on her.. and I don’t think it’s anything of a moral or ethical nature that has her worried. She could care less what people thought of her drug use, bestiality, brother screwing or whoring. Nope, makes me think it’s something criminal that would send her away for a long time. Something she really doesn’t want to get out cause her ass would be fried.

    Reply
  88. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:06 am

    @cuze:
    I would bet it has something to do with the adoptions and the funds. Remember she is a thief and the cops were on the way to arrest her so….funds were hidden also in different accounts.

    Reply
  89. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:08 am

    @cuze:
    One exception, if he has proof she was molesting one or more of the kids, that would be curtains for her. jmo all he would have to do is demand she give up all parental rights or….go to jail.

    Reply
  90. harikari girl said on May 20th, 2009 at 1:47 am

    @Kate:Or it could be as simple as having proof that she’s still using heroin or methadone. If he had a P.I. on her, you can bet he’d have the name of the doctor’s (methadone) or dealers (heroin). Depending on how extensive his proof is – he could have found out she was using during an adoption – that would make the adoption null and void because she would’ve been denied on the spot by any country. Or proof that she’s been using. Period. No way she’d get the kids then AND she’d be shot as far as her movie career. JMO.

    Reply
  91. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:22 am

    @N’other Name:
    bb14. Its about 1/4 down by astro and it gives the link of popsugar of brad and ange arriving. its by astro

    Reply
  92. benjaminbutton14 said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:32 am

    @CC:
    bb14. Boy oh boy does she know the cameras on her, and they will be as she walks up the red carpet. If she is hanging all over him I’ll throw up. This is the attention she craves for.

    Reply
  93. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:41 am

    @Kate:
    @benjaminbutton14:
    Thanks, you guys!! Will try and look this up. Thank goodness, I’m working @ home tomorrow (or today, whatever your time frames are) – ‘wink, wink’, the rest of my attorneys & staff are at a convention, so I will be on this site until Thursday, ChiTown time. Ok, I’ll do my due diligence and find out this about this whole thing. Much appreciated for the update and now I’m going to HAVE to see this picture arriving @ Cannes. Although, if IAN is on this, then I’m with him, as are you! So, now am going to find this picture of the both of them. HMMMM!!! XO

    Reply
  94. karenab said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:46 am

    The Man with One Red Shoe -
    2 synopsis :
    In order to send the CIA on a wild goose chase, Richard is picked out of an airport crowd because of his distinctive odd shoes (one red). With the CIA following every move he makes, the bad guys get some breathing space. One of his CIA followers is the beautiful Maddy. She uses all the tricks to try to get information out of him, but she doesn’t count on falling for him.

    When Richard’s practical joking friend Morris hides all but 2 mismatched shoes, he is forced to wear one red shoe back from a trip. A CIA man has to set his watchers on someone and seeing that one eye catcher, fingers Richard as a courier. This excessively complicates his life. Morris is especially hard hit by this as the sudden appearance and disappearance of people and things causes him to wonder about his sanity.

    Reply
  95. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:47 am

    @Kate:
    Kate, i agree with you re: ” i can not wait to go to work each day” LOL…. JA been giving us clue or she just want to get back to AJ in a very nice and classy way. no wonder she looks happy in the pic this past few weeks… the necklace in the pic was not very clear, i know its gold necklace but i can not see the pendant… lets say its the same one, then, BP is rubbing SALT in AJ’s face! LMAO…

    dringking whiskey like its 1999 – could the year means anything or maybe whiskey is more valueable when aged? maybe AJ/CB is very pricey in some way? JMO.. i’m not good with riddles…

    Reply
  96. carol said on May 20th, 2009 at 2:53 am

    @Kate:

    “…IAN tells you flat out they are finished. He has been saying this for 3 months…”

    Therein lies my own concern, Kate. Three months (or more) of “they’re finished” but during that time what has surfaced as conclusive proof that any of these claims hold water? I’m looking for pictures or videos of Brad Pitt romancing with a mysterious mistress at dinner etc. What about the alleged Sudanese who, per IUC, will boldly confront Brad while in Cannes no matter what? Will something confrontational actually go down on the red carpet, will we ever get independent proof that this happened at all? I’d love to see it happen, but after months and years of rumors and speculation I’ve yet to see such evidence. The mere fact that they both appear here and there together (shopping, arriving at Cannes, going out for dinner) hardly strengthens the break-up rumors, even if that is all just PR.

    Reply
  97. Different Guest said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:02 am

    @ladybert62:A therapist I knew once said that Freud set back sexual abuse therapy by at least 50 years. He couldn’t believe so many women in his practice were reporting real sexual abuse (in some ways he was a real prude) so that’s where he came up with the Oedipus Complex – when more likely he was seeing women traumatized by childhood sexual abuse. His theory is still used to discount or outright disbelieve a child reporting sexual abuse.

    Would be amusing if BP stiff arms AJ down the red carpet.

    Reply
  98. tessouille said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:29 am

    No he arrived first on Saturday. He settled in Eden Rock Cap Antibes and she arrived yesterday night after La Hague ‘netherlands) where she met Brad to dinner. I think it’s true because i’m in France and that’s what french Tv and blogs have been reported since Saturday. @Astro:

    Reply
  99. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:38 am

    CB – vanityfair

    http://www.vanityfair.com/style/features/2008/09/bruni200809?currentPage=2

    Reply
  100. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:41 am

    @Different Guest:
    Hey, I’ve got a very, very good friend who is a psychologist – she’s gay, I’m straight – means nothing here ’cause the girl is AWESOME, and everytime I talk to her, we speak for at least 3 hours. LOVE that woman, but I’ve gone thru ABSOLUTE hell the last 9 years – and she always says ‘maybe you should talk to someone!’ I ALWAYS laugh about this (and, trust me I believe that people in crisis shoud talk to someone, who is REALLY, REALLY GOOD). However, I am 100% Irish and I mentioned to her last night – Do you know what Freud said?? She said, What?? The quote from Freud was that the ‘Irish are the only race that are ‘impervious’ to psycho-therapy/analysis”. Paraphrasing here but, WHOA, totally true!! Sorry, to the rest that are NOT Irish – ’cause he was right in a way – (Look @ the movie ‘The Departed’) – That is NOT even what is right – but MAN, I have to ‘work thru things in my own way’ – But I DO encourage others to talk to someone who is really good. However, can’t do it myself. So, maybe, Freud was right in a way. I would NEVER encourage anyone to do the same as I, but I couldn’t do anything other that was ‘adverse’ to me. I just always have to work things ‘in my own mind’. I DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS FOR ANYONE ELSE. Just seek help, please, I am just a different ‘animal’. Igore me, but talk to someone. Don’t even know how I got on this subject, probably from my talk last night with this beautiful person, who happens to be a psychogist. Hey ‘ignore’ the spelling if it is wrong. XOXO

    Reply
  101. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:44 am

    Some food for thoughts… :) from French Wikipedia, regarding CB :

    En 1999, elle rencontre Julien Clerc lors d’un dîner et lui confie qu’elle écrit des chansons. Quelques semaines plus tard, elle lui envoie un texte intitulé Si j’étais elle. Julien Clerc compose la musique de cette chanson et sort l’album Si j’étais elle dont Carla Bruni a écrit les cinq autres titres.

    TRANSLATION :
    ==============
    In 1999, during a dinner, she met Julien Clerc [a French singer and songwriter] and told him she writes songs. A few weeks later, she sent him a text calld “if I were her”. Julien Clerc wrote the music and releases the album “if I were Her”, album for which Carla wrote the 5 other songs.

    So, in this context, The title of the song (if I were HER), released in 1999 could be a good clue !

    Your thoughts ?

    Reply
  102. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:48 am

    @Diane:
    To complete… regarding AJ :

    Jolie et Miller divorcent le 3 février 1999

    TRANSLATION :
    ==============
    AJ and Miller get divorced in 1999.

    (same source)

    Reply
  103. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 3:51 am

    @Diane:
    A clue?? Oh, yeah, more than just a ‘clue’, that woman knows how to work it!! Can you even imagine??

    I think you’re onto something, big time. I wouldn’t put anything past her. So, I think you are RIGHT on the money. JMO!!!

    Reply
  104. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:00 am

    @Diane:
    Are we the only 2 up hee?? Shouldn’t Keane be up by now, of course she does have to work here. I’m just posting ’cause I’m supposed to be ‘working’ @ home tomorrow – but it is 3:58 am, my time! Oh, well!!

    Reply
  105. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:03 am

    @N’other Name:

    Wow ! I never read anything regarding”Girl, interrupted”, but I did right now and… It’s from 1999 too and makes sense in all that mess !

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girl,_Interrupted_(film)

    Reply
  106. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:04 am

    @Canuck:
    Wow, Canuck – thank goodness someone else is on this site. Will check this out!1

    Reply
  107. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:04 am

    I’m in Switzerland, CEST time (so it’s 11.05 AM here !)

    Reply
  108. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:11 am

    @Diane:

    @Canuck:
    Wow, you guys! I’m not the only one here @ this late time. I’ll check this out! I’m here for awhile. Don’t know what your time frame is but I’m on CT time. I’ll be back!

    Reply
  109. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:15 am

    @N’other Name:
    CEST means : Central European Summer Time, so UTC + 2 hours

    … which also means that’s time for me to have an ice cold beer on the terrace :)

    Reply
  110. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:17 am

    @Diane:
    You’re in Switzerland??? I am SOOO jealous! I learned how to ski downhill there. LOVE that country, best country in the world!!! Would LOVE to live there!! This kinda makes me sad, I LOVE your country. Oh, well, I’m stuck in Chicago – however, it is beautiful here, but NOT your country. Maybe someday I’ll live there!!! XO

    Reply
  111. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:19 am

    @Canuck:
    canuck, thank you….. its the same necklace… ooo… happiness…..
    @N’other Name:
    i’m still here. NY is 11 hours behind me…. late noon here. but i always sleep late and wake up early.

    Reply
  112. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:21 am

    @Diane:
    Ahh, great – an ‘ice cold beer’ on the terrace. Why don’t you just put a gun to my head?? I WANT TO BE THERE!!!! Wow, looking at my life right now, just sucks!!! :)

    Reply
  113. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:22 am

    @Diane:
    GMT + 8 here. hey, i’ve been to geneva once long time ago…. nice country….

    Reply
  114. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:25 am

    @N’other Name:
    i really hope you can visit switzerland! you will go crazy over there! perfume and watches…… hah…… i want to go again…..

    Reply
  115. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:29 am

    @sheen:
    Love hearing from you, but I cannot even ‘compute’. Huh?? Ok, if NY is 11 hours behind you, so Chicago would be 10 hours behind you?? I think I’m brain dead right now – here’s the deal – Central Time (Chicago) is now 4:27 am. And, what are you?? Forgive me, I am just laughing here, ’cause I’m just tired. Let me know and glad to see you post here!! XO

    Reply
  116. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:32 am

    @N’other Name:
    and I’m on the Lake onf Geneva. OK. I stop from now :p

    @sheen:
    You’re living in Australia ? I whish to go there !

    Cheers from my terrace, everybody :) (I love my laptop and the WiFi connexion !)

    Regarding the “red shoe / black shoe” thing, could it be possible that it only means that they are like two pieces of one pair ? Similar people ? Yin and Yang in their craziness ? (sorry, it’s not so easy for me to write in English, so apologizes for the mistakes.)

    I don’t now if this post form SRRC means that they had and affair together or just to point out all the similarities they have in their crazyness, way of using drugs, people, media, etc.

    Reply
  117. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:33 am

    @N’other Name:
    now i’m confused…. here is 5.32 pm what are you doing still up? you need rest… now i sound like my mother. australia is 2 hour ahead of me and there’s nobody from downunder…

    Reply
  118. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:36 am

    @Diane:
    i’m from malaysia. small country just above singapore. actually i live just 45 minutes from singapore. you want to go to australia? you should you know…. i love brisbane…. i was lucky i could travel due to work….

    Reply
  119. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:36 am

    @sheen:
    Aghh!!! Sheen, I don’t give an ‘eff’ about perfume and watches. WTF, I just want to ski downhill and eat at the most ‘wonderful’ restaurants. You are making me TOTALLY laugh here, I’m just not a ‘girly girl’, but, WOW, do I LOVE perfume?? – Oh, BIG TIME!!!!! So you are totally right about that – just get me on the slopes! Oh, yeah, and FOOD!!! XO!!!

    Reply
  120. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:41 am

    Continuing trying to decipher all that… Regarding the “Whisky” thing (and as we’re speaking about time zones), did you know that : whiskey Time Zone : Military UTC – 10 hours ???

    Ok, that one is a little bit far fetched LMAO !

    Reply
  121. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:44 am

    @sheen:
    This is making me laugh!! I KNOW where Malasia is, but, wow, you are about – what 12 hours ahead – OK, I might be wrong here. This is the deal, right now , as I speak it is 4:41 am Chicago time. Don’t even ask mem what I’m doing up – this is about the ONLY time I can do this, ’cause I am supposed to be working @ home (tomorrow/today), whatever. But, wow, if you are here for awhile, I’ll be here too. Unless, I just get a little tired! XOXO

    Reply
  122. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:44 am

    @N’other Name:
    hahahah….. FOOD i can do but ski slopes? i’ll pee in my pants! hahahaha…… but hey! watches are cheap over there.

    @Diane:
    you could be right about 2 pieces in 1 pair… both uses people like for their own benefits…

    Reply
  123. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:51 am

    @sheen:
    I went to Singapore, Bali, but Never in Malaysia :) Love the South-East Asia ! Sooooo Beatutiful ! I’ll probably fihish my life in the nearby of Ubud !

    @sheen:
    In French, there’s an expression which litterally says : both are to put in the same bag !

    Reply
  124. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:55 am

    @Diane:
    Ok, sorry for giggling my butt off here, but, HUH??, WHAAAT??? Ok, I’m just laffin’ my a** off here, but, WTF ARE YOU SAYING??? This is why I LOVE THIS SITE!!! So, ssooo, funny, BEYOND!!!!! X0XO But, really, HUH?? LAFFIN’ HYSTERICALLY HERE!!!

    Reply
  125. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 4:58 am

    @Diane:
    thank you diane. i like bali too… nice beach. singapore? (N’other Name, dont laugh!) i only shop in singapore…. LOL….. where are from diane?

    “both are to put in same bag”? LOL… my brain is not working right!

    Reply
  126. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:01 am

    I just bought the latest Grazia magazine and nearly spit out my tea when I came across the latest Schweppes “Experince metters” ad, pg 119. I can’t find a copy of it online to post, so I’ll have to describe it. Rodeo Drive, hollywood sign on the hill in the background, Lamborghini parked , chic boutiques. The first boutique is named “ORPHAN BOUTIQUE” and in the window there are signs saying “This seasons must have accessory”, “Malawian”, “Cambodian”, “Ethiopian”, “As seen in “what’s hot”, and the best bit is that there is a couple walking in front, she has a bag slung over her shoulder marked “ORPHAN BOUTIQUE” and although they are drawn from behind, it looks suspciously like Brangie.

    Just to give you an idea of the “tone” of the ad, here are some of the previous ones they have done:

    http://www.advertolog.com/paedia/prints/2009/03/31/297442/

    Reply
  127. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:06 am

    @sheen:
    Sheen, I’m not ‘really’ laughing. I think you are nice and am so glad to have met you on this blog. Ok, however, I am a little ‘punchy’ here as now it is 5:04 am CT time. Don’t even ask why I am still up right now! But, really nice meeting you over this site and hope you become a regular!!! XOXO

    Reply
  128. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:11 am

    @N’other Name:Of course, you understand I was just kidding :p

    @sheen:
    I’m in Montreux… :) And from now, I know that I’ll be an heated person for a lot of ppl here :)

    And “both are to put in same bag” means that they are the same piece of dirt laundry (like dirt socks !) you put in a bag for cleaning… Does it help ? (so difficult to find an appropriate translation !)

    Reply
  129. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:12 am

    @Canuck:
    canuck, i can not open the page.

    @N’other Name:
    thank you N’other Name. i’m glad to met you here too…. i’ve been reading IUC for nearly a month and i love it! somedody need to expose evil angie and i’m sure ian can do it. i have faith in him. GO IAN!

    Reply
  130. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:16 am

    @Diane:
    diane, i’m sure all good people here wont judge you. and thank you for the translation. i understand now….

    Reply
  131. rotorua said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:18 am

    @CC:
    and just look at the sadness on brad’s face… If that isn’t the loo of someone who is totally “over it”… well, let’s see if they schmooze at all on the red carpet. men are normally terrible at hiding when they no longer care for someone.
    http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2009&mon=05&evt=jolie-pitt-dinner-date&pic=angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-dinner-date-04.jpg

    Reply
  132. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:27 am

    @rotorua:
    he look sad didn’t he? i really pitty him. he is not my favourite person in past few years. i can not even watch his movies… the cheating… and the humilation he put JA through….

    Reply
  133. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:27 am

    @Diane:
    @sheen:
    To both of you two, LUV YA’ both!!! You two make me smile BIG TIME!! And, that’s a huge compliment from me (whether or not you take it so) ’cause I’m not crazy about some of these ‘loonies’, but you guys are the real deal. Hey, keep in touch!!! XOXO Well, we will, of course, but now it’s getting light out here – YIKES!! I’m just goint to have to turn my phone off for about 6-7 hours – but thanks to both of you for keeping me company for so early in the morning. BEST to both of you and all of yours!!!!!!

    Reply
  134. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:43 am

    @N’other Name:
    Yep ! Was funny ! Definitively keep in touch here. Have a great working day :p

    Reply
  135. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:44 am

    @N’other Name:
    thank you! of course we take it as compliment….. not loonies. loonies have over active imaginations. the things they wrote about brangie makes me want to hide under my mothers armpit… its funny, you are in USA, diane in Europe, i’m in Asia…. LOL….

    Reply
  136. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:45 am

    @Diane:
    XO!!!

    Reply
  137. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:49 am

    @sheen:
    That’s nice Sheen!! Wow, can you imagine – we’re all friends and we are ALL over the world. We’ll talk soon! XO to you and Diane. Good night, but that’s my time, not yours!!

    Reply
  138. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:52 am

    @N’other Name:
    night. have a good rest.

    Reply
  139. N'other Name said on May 20th, 2009 at 5:54 am

    @Diane:
    @sheen:

    OOPS!! Really, I shoud be saying ‘Good Morning’ my time – it is now 5:52 CT. Am going to bed now, but really should never had said Good Night! Good Morning, my friends!! XOXO OVER & OUT!!! See ya’ on the next post! :)

    Reply
  140. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:01 am

    Not sure if this pic has been posted yet… but I think it’s another signal. As Kate mentioned, we have JA wearing the hat now… and BP showed up with an open-necked shirt and still wearing the necklace JA gave him (in your face AJ!) and now lookie who’s wearing the scarf:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1184692/The-Brad-Pitt-Angelina-Jolie-circus-rolls-Cannes-couple-arrive-separately.html

    I tell ya, I’m almost glad AJ showed up now… the body language in the pics is screaming “stick a fork in it”. The few of them getting out of the car when going to dinner, BP looks miserable, AJ looked angry in a couple and seemed to be looking to BP as if to try to fake the tone between them… I saw no affection or touching in any of the photos, getting out of the car on separate sides… just small things like that which speak volumes, especially when they know they’re being photographed.

    Reply
  141. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:10 am

    SHOWBIZZSPY

    Jennifer Aniston has been forced to take time off from shooting her new movie The Baster — because her hectic lifestyle has reportedly left her exhausted.

    The 40-year-old actress has been given time off from filming the comedy in New York after complaining of feeling ill.

    “Jen has been pouring herself into this role while at the same time jetting off to promote Management,” reports one insider. “Her life is hectic anyway with her producing responsibilities and the pressure of being in the public eye all the time.

    “It all just caught up with her in the last few days so she’s been told to take a break. She’s exhausted.”

    Reply
  142. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:24 am

    @sama:
    Hehe, maybe she’s in Cannes too…

    Reply
  143. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:25 am

    @Canuck:

    HAHAHA that would be crazy if she was, a good one

    Reply
  144. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:50 am

    @Peri:
    peri! grey scarf! LOL…. Jen always wear grey scarf!

    @Canuck:
    canuck! i wish she ’s in cannes too….

    Reply
  145. moo said on May 20th, 2009 at 6:54 am

    The Man with One Red Shoe is a remake of Le Grand blond avec une chaussure noire, French for “the tall blonde man with one black shoe”. … so does this mean AJ is the American version of CB?

    Reply
  146. sheen said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:04 am

    @moo:
    i’m sorry moo, i can’t make any comment obout the movie coz i have not watch it. btw, thank you for freudian assumption link you post earlier.

    Reply
  147. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:07 am

    @moo:
    or that they are a pair, one French, one American.

    Reply
  148. moo said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:08 am

    @sheen:
    Must admit I’ve never watched them myself I just googled it and copied and pasted one of the results the same with the Freudian assumption, I’m a big just a big cheat really!

    Reply
  149. moo said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:09 am

    @Canuck:
    That sounds alot better, yes I think you’re right there!

    Reply
  150. guest said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:18 am

    Although Carla Bruni certainly has a ‘history’ – who hasn’t? – and probably had many affairs, etc.. I wouldn’t compare her to the succubus Jolie. Bruni might be high-flying, calculating, egoistic, but she is not malicious, and she is not a psycho-bitch. And that is the main difference. Comparing the evil plastic-fantistic Jolie to Carla Bruni puts Jolie’s viciousness into perspective.

    Reply
  151. cutegrly said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    I must say Brad’s looking pretty good this morning on the Today show. He’s wearing his shades though. Ann is about to interview him live. I really hate that Ang showed up. I wish they’d just announce it already.

    Reply
  152. cutegrly said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    Wow he completely avoided her personal questions! Usually he is a little more open to personal questions but he wasn’t going there at all!

    Reply
  153. Caribsmom said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    Well, Brad wouldn’t talk about AJ, Ann asked him if this was the happiest time of his life and he deflected it by saying something like “Its a time of new direction” IMO they will announce the split after his media blitz for IB, He doesn’t want to say how happy they are and have egg on his face when they split. Must say he is looking fine!!

    Reply
  154. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:43 am

    @Caribsmom:
    He said that “It was the most on-track”.

    Reply
  155. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:44 am

    @Canuck:
    But he didn’t say where that track is leading him. ;)

    Reply
  156. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:44 am

    @ Canuck – WOW that is amazing, that is a Schwepes advert? Good on them for that! I can’t believe a drinks company would go so against the grain like that, but maybe they think the controversy would be good publicity for them? Well if they’re going to call out the Brange in such exceptional style, I will be buying their products in support! Go Schwepes!

    Reply
  157. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:46 am

    @Keane:
    Gin Tonics for everyone! LOL. Flip through the Grazia today if you get a chance, pg. 119.

    Reply
  158. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:49 am

    @Canuck:Thank God he said that. I’m glad he’s not doing the ‘PR mis-truth’ about the state of the Brange, and that he’s pretty much coming clean now. When Ann asked him what was next, he spoke about new direction. Then when she asked him if it was the happiest time of his life he said ‘it was the most on track’. So he is confident in the direction he’s heading, knows where he’s going and knows it’s the best place for him.

    Reply
  159. Caribsmom said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:57 am

    Has anyone ever seen Lie to Me? Dr Lightman would have a field day with his body language. When asked a personal question (cant remember which one) he looked down at the floor.

    @Canuck Thanks for the clarification!

    Reply
  160. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    @well:
    Yeah, he danced around those personal questions totally. And when she actually mentioned his “beautiful partner”, he jumped in and asked “where are we going with that?” as in “this is not something I’m going to discuss”.

    Reply
  161. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 7:59 am

    Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

    Brad Pitt took Angelina Jolie to celebrate with his friends at an intimate dinner – for 60.

    On Tuesday, the power pair dined at the Michelangelo in Cap D’Antibes for the special meal on the eve of Pitt’s big movie premiere at the 62nd Cannes Film Festival.

    The stars and the crew of Inglourious Basterds – including director Quentin Tarantino, Diane Kruger (with boyfriend Joshua Jackson), Emile Hirsch and Daniel Bruhl – dined on pasta with crayfish, ravioli with truffles, spaghetti with clams, and round pasta with garlic sausage, washed down with Dom Perignon. Also in the restaurant: Twilight’s Robert Pattinson.

    The dinner date came soon after Jolie arrived from Holland, where she had observed a war crimes trial. On Wednesday, Pitt starred at a press conference at the Palais. Later in the day, he and Jolie are expected to walk to red-carpeted steps for the unveiling of his WWII, in which he plays an American soldier from rural Tennessee, as Pitt told Ann Curry in a Today show interview live from Cannes on Wednesday.

    Staying Nearby
    “The dinner was a private event for the entire cast of Quentin Tarantino’s film,” a member of the restaurant staff tells PEOPLE. “They all had a wonderful time. Angelina and Brad were lovely, the loveliest people I have ever met!”

    The eatery is a familiar haunt for Pitt, who was seen there with pal George Clooney during promotion for their Ocean’s movies. Pitt and Jolie are staying nearby, in a house on the grounds of the exclusive Hotel du Cap.

    In his Today interview, Pitt – dressed by designer Tom Ford and sporting an ascot – talked about his Inglourious Basterds movie character (surprisingly heartless), his being named one of Time magazine’s 100 Most Influential People for his work building houses in New Orleans (”It’s working down there,” he said), and his life right now (”Still about discovery and finding new interests”).

    But he grew visibly skittish when asked about Jolie, though he did credit their children for his life being on track, because being at home with them, he said, is both satisfying and gratifying.

    Reply
  162. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:01 am

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20280074,00.html

    Reply
  163. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:05 am

    @Caribsmom:
    Love that Show! I love it when he describes a tell, and then they cut to footage or photos of politicians doing the same thing.

    Reply
  164. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    @ sama – yes that’s what I always think about Angelina, what a “lovely” woman, the “loveliest woman” I never met – ha ha ha!

    Reply
  165. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:10 am

    @Canuck:Oh I saw that. Cut her off at the knees when she brought up AJ, just as I expected. I hope he’s ready for the performance of his life this afternoon/evening on the red carpet. I have no idea how he is able to stand beside her. Just the thought of it makes me sick to my stomach.

    Reply
  166. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:16 am

    i suspect it is a foreign politician that AJ is involved with — now to narrow down who that is. and politician is a pretty broad term….

    and carla and AJ do indeed sound like 2 peas in a rotten pod JMO IMO

    Reply
  167. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    @sama:
    Thanks for posting that.
    First of all, I have to say, I cannot stand Ann Curry. She’s obviously in lerve with him because she loses her train of thought if she tries to ask a question and look at him at the same time.
    His body language seemed to say “embarrassed” to me when she brought up AJ. Very deflective answers. She asks about AJ, he talks about the kids–changing the subject. And being on the right track (12 steps?).
    Love the JA grey scarf. Odd choice, it doesn’t really go with the rest of the outfit. They call it an ascot in the articles and it is not an ascot–much too bulky. It looks like it’s made of wool, not silk.

    Reply
  168. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    @well:
    He’ll no doubt have that not very happy look on his face, the “I’m smiling but showing no teeth and it doesn’t go to my eyes either” smile that we’ve been seeing for the past few months. RIght up until disguised Jen, who is off sick for a few days from her filming, asks for his autograph from the crowd. LOL

    Reply
  169. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    @stinky-inky:
    I meant to credit Peri with the grey scarf call-out!

    Reply
  170. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    @cuze:

    hmm.. could it mean they pose together (like dolls would?) or without real passion/compassion, pose like plastic dolls? or maybe this is another reference to the diaper/bottle scenario.

    “The first cut is the deepest” – remember the post that Mick took AJ’s virginity? there is a rod stewart song called “first cut is the deepest” also a euphemism for losing virginity, i believe. MO IMO

    Reply
  171. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    @stinky-inky:
    Cashmere from the looks of the closeups.

    Reply
  172. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:21 am

    Have I missed the interview on NBC w/BP?……….

    Reply
  173. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    I was wondering if the gold signet ring on his left pinkie is new, anyone seen him with it on before?

    Reply
  174. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    @Kikumon:
    Google “Today Show” and they have it online.

    Reply
  175. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:24 am

    @stinky-inky:
    Wonder if the necklace is hiding under that scarf?

    Reply
  176. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    Thx doing it right now@Canuck:

    Reply
  177. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    ok. found something 1985 movie “the man w/ one red shoe” based on a french movie about a man with one black shoe. Spy caper. here is a synopsis: http://permissiontokill.blogspot.com/2008/01/man-with-one-red-shoe-1985.html

    Reply
  178. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    @Kikumon:

    Here it is…

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20280074,00.html

    Reply
  179. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    @sinker:

    forgot to add: is this implying that both AJ and Carla are spies?

    Reply
  180. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    Brad looked terrible when they were getting out of the car……..not a happy camper….

    Reply
  181. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:28 am

    Thank you soooo much…..xxoo@well:

    Reply
  182. tessouille said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:33 am

    diane are you in french switzerland if you live on the lake of Geneva? I’m from France near Toulouse.@Diane:

    Reply
  183. Guest said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:33 am

    Cannes review: Tarantino’s Basterds is an armour-plated turkey

    Quentin Tarantino’s wartime spaghetti western about a bunch of Nazi-hunting Americans is just Gott-awful

    Like the loyal German bourgeoisie in 1945, trying to keep patriotically cheerful despite the distant ominous rumblings of Russian tanks, we Tarantino fans have kept loyally optimistic on the Croisette this week. We ignored the rumourmongers, the alarmists and defeatists, and insisted that the Master would at the last moment fire a devastating V1 rocket of a movie which would lay waste to his, and our, detractors. But today the full catastrophe of his new film arrived like some colossal armour-plated turkey from hell. The city of our hopes is in flames.

    Quentin Tarantino’s cod-WW2 shlocker about a Jewish-American revenge squad intent on killing Nazis in German-occupied France is awful. It is achtung-achtung-ach-mein-Gott atrocious. It isn’t funny; it isn’t exciting; it isn’t a realistic war movie, yet neither is it an entertaining genre spoof or a clever counterfactual wartime yarn. It isn’t emotionally involving or deliciously ironic or a brilliant tissue of trash-pop references. Nothing like that. Brad Pitt gives the worst performance of his life, with a permanent smirk as if he’s had the left side of his jaw injected with cement, and which he must uncomfortably maintain for long scenes on camera without dialogue.

    And those all-important movie allusions are entirely without zing, being to stately stuff such as the wartime German UFA studio, GW Pabst etc, for which Tarantino has no feeling, displaying just a solemn Euro-cinephilia that his heart isn’t in. The expression on my face in the auditorium as the lights finally went up was like that of the first-night’s audience at Springtime for Hitler. Except that there is no one from Dusseldorf called Rolf to cheer us up.

    Pitt plays Lt Aldo Raine, the leader of an anti-Nazi commando unit whose avowed mission is to get 100 Kraut scalps apiece; we see the scalpings in full, gruesome detail, yet that figure is entirely forgotten about by the end. Mélanie Laurent plays Shosanna Dreyfus, a beautiful young Jewish woman whose family were slaughtered by SS Col Hans Landa, played by Christoph Waltz. She got away and (somehow) attained not only a new identity, but also ownership of a Paris cinema which is to play host to the premiere of Dr Goebbels’s latest propaganda movie, in the presence of the Führer himself. Her plan is to incinerate the entire first-night audience by bolting the doors and igniting her vast inflammable stock of nitrate film. Meanwhile Lt Raine has his own plans for killing Hitler at the movie theatre and the Brits get involved too, in the form of suave Michael Fassbender as Archie Hicox, a crack commando making contact with exotic spy Bridget von Hammersmark, played by Diane Kruger.

    There are some nice-ish performances, particularly from Fassbender and Waltz, but everything is just so boring. I was hoping for Shosanna at least to get a satisfying revenge on the unspeakable Col Landa. But no. The two Hitler-assassination plots cancel each other out dramatically and the director’s moderate reserves of narrative interest are exhausted way before the end. He should perhaps go back to making cheerfully inventive outrageous films like Kill Bill. Because Kill Adolf hasn’t worked out.

    • Peter Bradshaw is the Guardian’s film critic

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/may/20/cannes-film-festival-tarantino-inglourious-basterds

    @sinker:
    “The first cut is the deepest” – remember the post that Mick took AJ’s virginity?

    I don’t think so. Jmo. There is a thread on FF about an abortion at twelve.

    Reply
  184. well said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:34 am

    I just watched it again and he really did cut her off the minute she mentioned AJ. And then he started to talk about new discoveries. I think the ‘the most on track’ period of his life comment is that he’s figured out who he wants to be with and is doing what he has to do in order to get there. And I think that comment was a meant as a message to her.

    Reply
  185. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:38 am

    @Canuck:
    Exactly–more pashmina than ascot.

    Reply
  186. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:41 am

    @stinky-inky:
    Absolutely. I spent part of the morning looking at pix of JA in grey scarves to see if he might be wearing one of hers.

    Reply
  187. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    @tessouille:
    Yes I do :) We’re along the same river !

    Reply
  188. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    Good morning everybodeee!! To all those who were hoping to catch Chelsea Lately the other night ragging on Brangie, It’s on YouTube now. Here’s the link (part 2):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWZ1iQdf5Gw

    And Part 1 of that is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWZ1iQdf5Gw

    Reply
  189. rotorua said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    @well:
    Agree with you. On track re getting his life together- new direction- sobriety, reconnecting with old friends, staying out of an emotional vortex. Those pics of him getting out of the car with jolie look like he’s having teeth pulled. he’s leaving the blackness behind…

    and where is jen on her days off… any idea, well?

    i’m off to bed. it will all be happening while i’m asleep. have fun, everyone!

    Reply
  190. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    @Guest:

    ….Brad Pitt gives the worst performance of his life…..

    (thanks for posting that review, guest!)

    Reply
  191. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    @Canuck:
    He never seems to be without it.

    Reply
  192. DonnaInMichigan said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    Angies demeanor getting out the the car in Cannes…

    “Alright, I am here, fuktard, lets get this sham over with..so I can go back to NY”.

    Reply
  193. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:47 am

    @stinky-inky:
    oh yeah, not pleasant watching her eat. there are videos from her dinner w/ clint and wife and she is chomping, stuffing her mouth, etc. yuk. JMO

    Reply
  194. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:49 am

    @well:
    @rotorua:
    Yes, I’d also like to know where she is on her days off. Strange timing, getting ill like that right at this moment.
    @HisHighness:
    Any ideas IAN, Sugar?

    Reply
  195. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    @stinky-inky:
    It’s probably his good luck, anti-voodoo charm.

    Reply
  196. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:51 am

    @Guest:
    From the sound of that review, QT should be praying for some kind of AJ-BP-JA showdown-screamfest-catfight on the red carpet, if only to distract people from the “colossal armor-plated turkey from hell.”

    Reply
  197. Diane said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:52 am

    @Diane:
    Ooops, tessouille ! I dunno why I read LYON instead of Toulouse but, no, we’re not on the same “river”

    Reply
  198. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 8:52 am

    For someone who hates to be stuck with Elvira he sures seems to be content . If he wanted Jen Anniston then why leave her in the first place ? Are these people not adults ? So there is really no reason to hide behind a necklace to signify adoration. If Brad still wanted Jen and she wanted him then they would have reconciled . This notion that he still wants Jennifer back and he so unhappy with Angelina Jolie is funny . AJ &BP aren’t immune to having problems in their relationship but, they are still in a relationship . If he’s not happy then he can walk out . Wait. I thought IUC already reported he did ?

    Brad was doing the interview with Ann Curry to promote the movie. Just coz he’s avoiding q’s about his personal life they must be on the brink of break up ? If he and Angelina have split then you would already know about it . Make something out of nothing . WTF ? Aren’t they at CANNES right now togetha ? Couldn’t he bring more suspicion by being at Cannes alone instead of givin these cyptic hints in an Ann Curry interview ? Look if he doesn’t want to be with Jolie she wouldn’t be in the picture anymore . If he had answered all Ann’s questions with lovey dovey type answers you would be saying,he’s just trying to be admirable, respecful putting on a brave face trying to sound convicing . A new direction = The past is the past and present is what’s new. Not going back to your ex wife who’s in your past. That’s the direction you previously came from . This is coming from someone who likes Jennifer Anniston.

    The level of bile here is horrid ! Am I to understand there are mothers and women postin here on a regular ? Quite a scary thought. One can only imagine how you all are in your personal lives. Call me a
    loon or plant. There’s just no way I could be a normal person . You can like or dislike Jolie but, I’m truly godsmacked at this level of bile. To wish death to someone and then everyone just agrees with that is just crazy . Accept one person. For you all to hate Angelina Jolie so much why do you talk about her all the time? She’s not war or genocide something you can really hate . But, these are actors ! C’mon . IUC has been proven wrong time so many times. But, you don’t see that ?

    Reply
  199. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:11 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:
    Sorry, have we all been wishing her dead? Don’t think so. I don’t recall a rousing chorus of “yes” to that, can you point me to those posts please? In particular, my own unless I’m the “one” you are talking about.

    The woman is a fake and a fraud who uses the misery of others to boost her own image, IMHO. I find that quite despicable, using the most vulnerable for PR purposes.

    Also, given their history of gushing over one another on the Red Carpet and in interviews, it’s more than a little odd that he was avoiding the subject today. It’s also more than a little odd that neither of their publicists have been denying all of the “trouble in paradise” rumours, as would normally be the case unless they actually want those rumours out there to prepare their fans for what is coming. That’s easy enough to see, if you stop to think about it.

    By the way, you need a new keyboard, yours seems to be missing the “e” the “r” and the “g”. Also, so that you can use it correctly the next time, it’s “goBsmacked”, not “goDsmacked”. Although I might start using that last the next time bad karma rears it’s ugly head at someone, it’s rather descriptive.

    Reply
  200. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:13 am

    I think he was very uncomfortable in this interview and not answering the questions about aj, i think his bodylanguage and answers are very telling…..

    Reply
  201. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:13 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    Yawn. Nothing to se here, move along…

    Reply
  202. stinky-inky said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    @Canuck:
    I was thinking the same–gob, not godsmacked. Godsmack is a band. I wasn’t sure since it’s sort of a brit phrase.

    Reply
  203. sama said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Brad Pitt Looks Uncomfortable During Interview About Angelina Jolie – Pictures
    In France…
    Wednesday 20th May 2009
    Brad Pitt dodged a question about his relationship with Angelina Jolie during an interview on US television this morning.

    The actor was being interviewed from the Cannes Film Festival in France when he was asked if he was satisfied with his life.

    He replied: “Right now, Ange has been working and I’ve got to be home a lot with the kids.

    “Err… let me be the cliché. It’s really rewarding.”

    Brad Pitt speaks to The Today Show. (pic: Splash News/NBC)

    When asked by the NBC Today Show’s Ann Curry where we was heading, Brad said his life was still about “discovery” and “finding new things of interest”.

    “The kids are certainly responsible for a lot of that,” he added.

    Brad, who is promoting new movie Inglorious Basterds at the festival, failed to mention Angelina in his response.

    The actor was then asked if this was one of the happiest times of his life, to which he replied it was one of the most “on track”.

    Brad Pitt speaks to The Today Show. (pic: Splash News/NBC)

    Brad and Angelina have faced constant speculation over the strength of their marriage over recent months.

    But the actor’s uncomfortable response during the interview comes just hours after the couple were pictured dining together.

    They joined cast and crew from Brad’s new film at the Michelangelo restaurant in Antibe last night.

    It was the first time the pair had been spotted in public together since the Academy Awards in Los Angeles three months ago

    Reply
  204. HisHighness said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:23 am

    @all – We’re close to breaking a blockbuster – stay tuned!!!!!!

    Reply
  205. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    Re: POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD

    I do wish these cretins could learn to not put a space before a full-stop. A full-stop does not have a space before it, it has none and 2 after. I would so appreciate it if people could stop misusing the spaces around full-stops when they post, another poster does it here and it drives me to distraction. Say what you like about us, say what you like about AJ, JA or BP but do not abuse the spaces around the full-stop, spaces are not to be abused on this site. My grateful thanks for your consideration of this notice. Oh and not replacing “er” with “a” in words would also be greatly appreciated. Many thanks.

    P.S. There was one poster who suggested that AJ would be better off dead and I suspected she was a plant here to incite people to agree with her. Unfortunately nobody did and in fact said they did not wish AJ dead, as they wouldn’t wish that on anyone. Does anyone recall who that poster was? It was a few threads back I think, I’d look it up but I can’t be arsed right now.

    @ Guest – oh dear, poor Bradley, another stinker. I guess he wasn’t too focused on his acting performance at the time, his personal life being a French circus and all that. Oh well, onwards and upwards Bradley, onwards and upwards my man!

    Reply
  206. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:27 am

    @stinky-inky:
    I kind of like the GodSmacked though, as in “Karma came calling and she was God-Smacked”, lol
    Better yet, smack is slang for heroin, so I suppose in that online video of AJ in a drug den, high as a kite, saying how it was really good stuff, not stepped on, maybe she was God-Smacked there too… ;)

    Reply
  207. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:28 am

    @HisHighness:
    Jen’s there, isn’t she? ;)

    Reply
  208. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:30 am

    @Canuck:

    You have wished everything else on Angelina Jolie . I didn’t see a post from you where you didn’t agree with the poster wishing death to Angelina Jolie . You don’t find it more than alittle odd and unsetteling your so obsessed with Angelina and her happiness ? You don’t find it odd that you spend most of your time obssessing whether she’s happy with Brad Pitt. You don’t find it odd that you seem to think the worst of Angelina and you have not one shred of proof off anything ? Accept that Brad cheated on his wife with her. You don’t find it odd that you have believed someone so blindy all coz you hate another person ? An if she’s a fake and fraud ? How do we know that your not these things if not worse in your life outside of this blog? Angelina Jolie is an actress idiot. If she has used others to advance her career, Are you telling me that most of the other starlets don’t utilize the same tactics ? I could name some actors right now who are thought to be so sweet and down to earth . Yet they are quite the opposite . If she’s all these bad things why on earth are you spending your breath talking about her ? Why not just wait for the break up then right ? An if they don’t break up and it’s somehow proven to you ,since Brad and Angelina must prove somehow to you they are legit . Then what will you do ? Blame Angelina ?

    Reply
  209. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:31 am

    @Canuck:

    Please, please, please let her be there!! :)

    Reply
  210. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:32 am

    @Keane:

    Keane, did we ever get any feedback on all of our various theories for the Kickapoo Kink thread???

    Reply
  211. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:37 am

    He needs Tom Ford to be a live in dresser…..He looked better than usual….@stinky-inky:

    Reply
  212. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:39 am

    @Keane:

    Keane you have given so many of us laughs. I think one day you should google yourself and IUC. The many boards around the net from loonies to normal people who all think with one echoing voice “You are fuckin nutz”. You know how many times you have accused people that I know that aren’t loonies or plants to be just that ? We would all appreciate if you took your medication . We would all appreciate it so much !!

    Reply
  213. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:46 am

    @Canuck:
    As soon as I read that post that she’d had to take time off from work because she was ill, I had the same thought! I mean, yeah, she could be in need of some rest… but man oh man what timing. (I also thought, maybe morning-sickness, she’s pregnant!) *laughing* I know I know. But I already said I hoped they’d get back together so I can’t help my wishful thinking.

    Reply
  214. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    @Kikumon:
    I thought the same. He looks great in that pink suit. Very well put together and CLEAN!

    Reply
  215. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:48 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:
    My dear PFAB, there are a lot of posts that I don’t respond to because I am ignoring what was said in them. I’m sure that you do the same on whatever board you frequent most of the time.

    Hardly obsessed if Angie is happy or not, I couldn’t give a rat’s ass frankly. Besides, she’s the sort of person who could have everything and still not be happy. Happy people generally don’t cut themselves, become drug addicts, or feel the need to prove to themselves that they are “better” because they can sleep with someone else’s man. It’s a shame that she hasn’t recognized that in herself actually, because maybe she could do what it takes to get rid of whatever issues she has that makes her act that way.

    And yes, I agree that Angelina is an actress idiot. And not a very good one at that actually.

    @Keane:
    The French do that with the one space before the period and one after.

    Reply
  216. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:49 am

    @HisHighness:
    Yikes – another one! I am ready… :P

    Reply
  217. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:49 am

    Hey, does anyone know what time The Walk is going to happen? And if it’s going to be televised or if there’ll be any live-feed on the ‘net anywhere?

    Yes, I’m obsessed.

    Reply
  218. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:51 am

    @Canuck:

    I think you care alot for Angelina Jolie .

    Reply
  219. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:51 am

    @too curious:
    Wouldn’t that be something? LOL
    @Peri:
    I think it’s great timing.

    Reply
  220. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:53 am

    I love the fact that BP and AJ’s dinner last night was…with 60 people!!!!! Typical date night, you know…

    Reply
  221. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:56 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:
    I care a lot for humanity in general.
    Odd way for you to put that. I’m not being snarky, but is English your native language? It’s not, is it?

    Reply
  222. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:57 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    If you have really been reading the posts here you would know that the over-riding concern here is for the safety and well being of the 6 children that AJ/BP have. Yes, many of us have a lot of contempt for someone who bought/adopted/delivered 6 children in such a short time span and never seems to spend any time with them – her projection of herself as this fabulous earth mother type doesn’t pan out,

    Reply
  223. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    @Canuck:

    Is obsession yours ?

    Reply
  224. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    ANGIE!!???? ANGIE!? IS THAT REALLY YOU???

    Reply
  225. anon said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:01 am

    http://www.starmagazine.com/angelina_catch_brad_jen/news/15613

    It will never end. Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston just can’t cut the cord, and it’s driving Angelina Jolie crazy!

    In the June 1 issue of Star — on sale today — we report that the drama in Hollywood’s most famous triangle just got nastier after Angie nailed Brad talking to his ex-wife, Jen, in the middle of the night!

    Earlier this month, Brad was in the kitchen of the family’s rented Long Island, N.Y., manse after all six kids had gone to sleep when — surprise! — Angie came home from the set of her movie Salt hours earlier than expected, and he was busted talking on the phone to his ex-wife.

    “Angie totally flipped out,” a family insider tells Star. “She slammed her hand on the counter and stormed out of the room.”

    Brad quickly hung up with Jen and ran after his livid lover — who an insider says felt “betrayed and disgusted” — but the battle was only beginning.

    Reply
  226. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:
    LOL, playing head games now, are we? That’s funny. OK, I’ll bite… Obsession is not mine…

    Reply
  227. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    @too curious:

    Your not concerned for those kiddies. That’s an excuse given to continue to obsess over Angelina Jolie. You could care less for those children . Is Angie raising the kiddies by herself ? You have no proof if she is or isn’t spending time with her kids. Too much analyzing every whim of her life .

    Reply
  228. HisHighness said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:03 am

    @ladybert62:
    First one Coming in the next few minutes – you rock!!!!

    Reply
  229. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    @sinker:

    Don’t flatter yourself like that. How convient of an excuse that would be for simpleton like you .

    Reply
  230. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    @HisHighness:
    Pleeeeeeeeeeeeease let it be what we want it to be!

    *sitting on my hands with a stupid obsessed grin on my face*

    Reply
  231. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    http://www.starmagazine.com/angelina_catch_brad_jen/news/15613

    Don’t care if there is any truth, just love that the pic of Jen she is looking sweet and in the one of AJ she looks like a harridan!

    Keane – Is Star one of the mags BP’s people send stories to? I know In Touch is BP and People is AJ, but I forget the others.

    Reply
  232. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:07 am

    Hope she is. Life with Angelina has brought Braddy to his knees, physically, mentally, emotionally. She couldn’t have done him any larger disfavor than she has by destroying his marriage, and destroying him…@Canuck:

    Reply
  233. mooki said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:08 am

    didn’t Angie appear in the Rolling Stones video for “Anybody Seen My Baby”? I’ve heard rumors that Mick bedded her after the shoot for that. She also appeared in videos for Lenny Kravitz’s “Stand By My Woman” (’91), The Lemonheads’ “Its About Time” (’93), and Meat Loaf’s “Rock and Roll Dreams Come Through” (’93)

    Reply
  234. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:08 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    Dear Clueless, you condemn us for allegedly making suppositions about AJ but then make your own about us. Whatever. *eyeroll*

    Perhaps you would feel more comfortable if you went back to the “otha” board.

    Reply
  235. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:10 am

    @Patty anne:
    I hope she is too, but I suspect I’m just being an optimist. DIsney does that to you ;)

    Reply
  236. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:11 am

    To all the regulars on this board (you know who you are), one of the things I love is the combination of the intellect of the group but also that when we go full stop on the sarcasm and snarkiness we all “get it” for what it is :)

    Smooches to all.

    Reply
  237. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:12 am

    And your degree in psychology is from where?@POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    Reply
  238. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    @HisHighness:
    YIPPEE!! I am waiting with bated breath! :P

    Reply
  239. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    @Patty anne:

    Loon U?

    Reply
  240. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    Careful poster, insanity could be contaegeous..wink!!@POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    Reply
  241. sinker said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    @too curious:

    note to self: do NOT use sarcasm with PFAB. it gets very confused.

    Reply
  242. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    LMAO!

    Reply
  243. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    @ladybert62:

    Me too! Although mine has the distinct scent of…Diet Coke on it! Ok, I’m lame but it is only 10!5 a.m. here.

    Reply
  244. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:16 am

    I thought Angie was living apart from Brad and the children in a hotel in down town NYC?@anon:

    Reply
  245. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:18 am

    @ladybert62:

    Do you remember those old Mervyn’s commercials where the shoppers were outside the doors peering in and saying “open, open, open”?? That is what I feel like, waiting and anticipating the next reveal from Ian!

    Reply
  246. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:19 am

    I was tring to read up on the also-evil Ms. Bruni and saw that she like the evil Ms. Jolie likes “feminine men.” Guess that is so both of them can then be the “masculine woman”! Dang these two are “twins separated at birth!” :D

    Reply
  247. POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:19 am

    Patty Anne, I was gonna ask you the same thing .
    Snarkiness masked in the form of mysogyny . That’s a new one .

    Reply
  248. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:19 am

    Good heavens! Do you live near Disneyworld also?@Canuck:

    Reply
  249. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:19 am

    I wish he’d hurry, I have to go out shortly. Type faster please Ian, lol

    Reply
  250. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:20 am

    @too curious:
    Me too! Open, open, open! I am still in “bated breath” mode and turning blue – hope it comes soon or I might pass out from anticipation! :-)

    Reply
  251. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    @ladybert62:

    It’s here!

    Reply
  252. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    @ POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD – I am devastated, the wise and learned internet community of the gossip blog does not like me, I am crying into my soup. This is the WORST news I have ever heard. I have only ever sought to make the dimwits and the cranks and the freaks of every gossip blog be my greatest fans. I cannot cope with this traumatic news. My life is over! How will I ever get over this?!!!! BWA HA HA HA!!! Only kidding bitches, I take that as a massive compliment! BIG smooches to you and all your stupid little internet friends from me x x x

    Reply
  253. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    HaHaHa @ Loon U. How appropriate. The more bite they attempt to put in their posts, the more they out themselves as Loons. You have to pity people who have given total mind control to someone/something such as Angie and her B.S Publicity Machine. If Otha Board is American, i shiver at the thought of that Loon voting in an election based on what Star magazine says….@too curious:

    Reply
  254. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    @Patty anne:
    No, just watched a lot of those Disney films with the happy endings when I was a kid. The nearest one to me would be EuroDisney.

    Reply
  255. Liin said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    Have you noticed ‘POSTER FROM ANOTHER BOARD’ almost sounds quite adult, do you think the ‘retards’ that normally come here to disrupt our threads have got their supervisor to post instead?

    Reply
  256. ladybert62 said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:23 am

    Dang – Just picturing the strange Mr. Jagger with the evil Ms. Jolie and the also-evil Mr. Bruni – my goodness these people are busy with all their banging! How do they ever get any work done! Laughing myself right off my chair at work … and I thought my family was crazy – gadzooks, these people make my family look like saints! :P

    Reply
  257. Kate said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:25 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:
    Your OP seem to reflect back my earlier post so I will just address this and say you are wasting your time here and you are wrong, IAN my dear has not been proven wrong.Stick around for the show if you like but I don’t debate with trolls.

    Reply
  258. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:28 am

    And you are saying you are a philogynist? No wonder you defend Angelina Jolie so strongly! Now i get it, you are jealous of Carla!….@POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    Reply
  259. Patty anne said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Oh..i live nearby DisneyWorld in Florida and i go every opportunity. It’s fantastic as well as MGM Theater park, Universal Theme Park, Sea World, i suppose i am spoiled having such fantastic entertainment so closeby@Canuck:

    Reply
  260. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:32 am

    @POSTER FROM ANOTHA BOARD:

    Today’s educational tip: misogyny is defined as the aversion to or hatred of Women. “Women” is the plural of “Woman”. Or are you counting each of AJ’s personas as a different woman?

    Reply
  261. too curious said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:37 am

    @Patty anne:

    Sooooooooooooooooooo jealous. My DH and I love Disney World. We haven’t been for a year and a half and are seriously missing our “home away from home”!

    Reply
  262. Keane said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    @ too curious – LOL at your last post, hilarious that any of these dumbasses think they would stand a chance against the combined sarcasm and wit of the IUC community! Oh well, they can give it a shot if they like I guess. Its, how do you say, “character-forming” for them!

    I’m not sure about Star though BTW, Kate seems to know about that. I’m sure she’ll fill you in.

    Reply
  263. tessouille said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:47 am

    When there are big stars, the walk USUALLY happens in the evening, around 7 or 8 or 9pm. so everybody can watch it. I’ve just heard on Cannes radio it will be as usual. @Peri:

    Reply
  264. TobyKat said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    @sama:
    Just watched the interview, Oh i think it speaks volumes. Ann Curry has always interviewed Brad in the past for the Today show. It is never Matt or Meredith, always Ann. Him being so completely uncomfortable with her few personal questions seemed a little out of character. It’s been a time of discovery, the most on track …..i really think the fog has been lifted for BP.

    Reply
  265. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    @tessouille:
    tessouille, bonjour! I came back to add that I just some articles reviewing the premiere showing of Inglorious Bastards and I saw one article that says AJ did NOT appear with BP, even though they were at the dinner last night. Is there a second showing of the film today, for the red carpet appearance, or was that it?

    Reply
  266. Peri said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    @Peri:

    I think I found something in answer to my own question… evidently they had a press screening this morning and scheduled photo ops, etc. I guess that’s what the article referred to about AJ not being with him. Though it *did* say the premiere of the movie. Ahhhh, I give up… going for my nap now.

    Reply
  267. Kikumon said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:57 am

    I hate waiting……….please please HH…….

    Reply
  268. Canuck said on May 20th, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Yeah, well we’ve got Amsterdam, LOL “Disneyland for adults”. hehehe

    Reply
  269. Antipodean said on May 20th, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    @justhelping:
    Meh, way to interpret. Not my business to defend a piece of shit mother – especially this one (whom I have absolutely no feeling for – except extreme dislike of her promotion of intercountry adoption). Just don’t see any bashing of Brad, or many other blokes in the same way that women get completely pulled to pieces here and/or on many other trashy sites like it. Could be wrong, as I haven’t been checking this site out for long. But it does seems OTT to me.

    Reply
  270. Antipodean said on May 20th, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    @harikari girl:
    Every time I open this site (admittedly have only been reading it for a few weeks), there is a post ripping into Angelina. She may busted up a marriage, she promotes intercountry adoption – I don’t even like what she represents. I just don’t see any equivalent posts deconstructing Brad in the same way. he was the one who was married – why isn’t the vitriol at least equally directed at him? It never. ever. is. But then like I said, I haven’t been looking at the site for long, maybe there have been complete shredding of him/other guys on here well before my time. Who knows? only the people who write these blogs I guess.

    Reply
  271. Z said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @Canuck:
    Wow, I may have missed that…I’ll have to watch again. That is more proof, imo. With that kind of thing he use to agree that AJ was the most beautiful partner…not side-step…very interesting.

    Reply
  272. Z said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    @well:
    I thought he looked like he was being polite. Did you see the video?….so he pulled off the acting (not aloof or angry), but he acted like he might with someone he is distant with or doesn’t know well….my opinion, of course. Being the perfect gentleman, because he had to.

    Reply
  273. Z said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    @Antipodean:
    There are a couple people that rip Brad. Not as often or as prevalent as AJ, but now and then someone says – hey, he’s an ass, too. And he is. I think because he has been looking so bad, may be one reason people have sympathy….he’s been back and forth through the wringer. jmo.

    Reply
  274. Antipodean said on May 20th, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    @Z:
    Ahh, well thanks for the insight… as it just seemed to strike me in that way as a newcomer to the site.

    Reply
  275. Z said on May 21st, 2009 at 12:57 am

    @Antipodean:
    I can see why. : )

    Reply
  276. Kate said on May 21st, 2009 at 4:40 am

    @Antipodean:
    I use to feel he was unforgiveable, until IAN began to reveal exactly what kind of person Angelina is. Brad may be a cheat and a liar but, and according to one sourjce Jen knew for 18 months, so not sure just how much I can realy detest him here for the cheating, they did have threesomes, and she is bisexual, so…

    I do however hold him responsible for how he treated her after the split, horrible, but I suspect much of that was Angelina, based on many of the other things we know, par . However, Jen has forgiven him and that is all that matters.

    Angelina is worse than a cheat, a liar, she manipulates with the intent to cause harm, she is a thief, not just of someone elses husband but of children, she does not mother the kids, she has no ethics, no morality, and has delved too far into the dark side to be a suitable parent imo. One has to be sacraficed, imo, it has to be her in order for the kids to have an chance at a decent life. Brad I believe will make it back to the other side and back to some of the values his parents raised him with, enough to be a good father in the long run with the right partner. jmo

    Reply
  277. Kate said on May 21st, 2009 at 4:54 am

    @justhelping:
    So where are we with this, “legally gave up childen”, what do you think?

    1-adoption
    2-parental rights
    3-abortion

    You know if Angelina ever gave a baby up for adoption that could explain her obsession with it, but she was never hidden away was she?

    Reply
  278. frustrated said on May 26th, 2009 at 9:31 am

    test

    Reply
  279. секс по телефону said on May 31st, 2009 at 1:10 am

    ммм )) симпотичный блог ;)
    Не думал сменить тему? Поставить ещё тройку плагинови будет безопаснее..ну это вот это будет нормально действительно :)
    Кстати , ты какой хоcTuHg юзаешь? =)

    Reply
  280. sertop06 said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:47 am

    у вас окупается проект? я знаю что выгоднее различные партнерки не поссылкам

    Reply
  281. gay34 said on June 4th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    мы геи ???

    Reply
  282. tolstushka82 said on June 5th, 2009 at 3:17 am

    тебе нравятся толстушки?

    Reply
  283. granny89 said on June 5th, 2009 at 8:41 am

    бабуле труднее писать блоги , как эх угнаться такие вот блоги

    Reply
  284. [...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt… grating…flamenco dance, no panties underneath…abstract treatises… hold each other like a baby doll…the first cut is the deepest…similar hard realities…tired of the burden…both suffered from neglect in childhood…both posed at Cannes … Read the rest of this great post here Posted in Uncategorized on May 19th, 2009 | [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

May 2009
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta