Ms. NineCent – The World’s First Nine Word Blogger and hottest Muslim Chick On Earth: Brad’s Mysterious Date

Posted on May 18th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Bits, IUC:Entertainment

Brad Pitt Seen Dining With Mysterious Lady in Cannes!

  1. ml said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    so mystery date
    sudenense model with whom she shares true love
    and reuniting w/antison.
    got it.

    Reply
  2. Jodie said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:13 pm

    You and the freaks on this site need to be locked up. What losers. Get a life. Brad/Angie are great and will remain so. So sad that you nutters are here believing every rumor this nut prints. You don’t realize that he and all the people running this site are Laughing their asses off that such freaks will believe any and everything. Brad will never leave Angelina for Jennifer. Nor is he leaving her for this phanthom woman. Best part they know nothing about you freaks and don’t care.

    See ya.. I will leave you nuts to continue your focus on two people who are happy and don’t give a rats ass about any of you..

    Reply
  3. chancesare... said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    So Brad is ALLEGEDLY in the company of another woman that we can’t even see? That’s illeagal???? He could be going over some project or something…. a cousin…Whot the fuck kows? And what’s with this jacked up picture? Who can even tell who’s under the umbrellas and in the company of some old fart? Are you joking?
    Pffft…This is some sorry ass excuse for some gossip. NEXT…

    Reply
  4. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    @ML: Would help if you could spell.

    Reply
  5. Astro said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    Hi…On Wednesday all doubts will be cleared…when we can see Brad and Angie together with a lot of love.

    Reply
  6. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    My Brad has aged….he looks positively elderly in that pic. (hahahaha just kidding – couldn’t resist).

    Reply
  7. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    @Z:
    Wait and is that Susan Boyle he is with? (ok, I’ll stop. : ))

    Reply
  8. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    @Jodie:
    Another sad and sorry loon.

    Reply
  9. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:38 pm

    This is a pathetic excuse for a story. Ian, if you’re “listening”, this just won’t do to calm the masses. What were/are you thinking? This is an insult to your loyal readers like Keane, Kate, etc. I’m new, but this kind of twat reminds me of one of my former emplyers’ ploys. Rise above, if you please.

    Reply
  10. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    Whoops. Would help if I could spell, too. “employers’ “. Ahem.

    @Z: Well, it appears that you and I are still “on it” tonight. My usual TV shows aren’t on tonight and my eyes are too tired for actual book reading, and I don’t feel like talking on the phone, so…here I is.

    Reply
  11. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    @SZ:

    Of course he’s about and about at CANNES with another lady and in NYC riding around on a motorcycle with another. Yet the PAPZ and other media outlets just seem to be missing this.. I thought Brad was threatening Angie’s career, If she didn’t attend CANNES ??? But, he’s all over CANNES now with another women . Make up your minds on what BS story you want to use and at least stick to it . This is such mierda . LOL !!!

    Reply
  12. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    @ Z-Why do you think Jodie’s a loon ?

    Reply
  13. stinky-inky said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:52 pm

    Am I missing something? Is BP in the picture? Is that him in the foreground? Is he wearing his TCCoBB old-man make-up? Confused.

    Reply
  14. DonnaInMichigan said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

    Ah..the mysterious dinner w/ a female.

    It could be anyone…not romantic, at all. It could be she is conducting an interview w/ Pitt.

    And if he’s been at Cannes for 2 days now, why NO pics of him whatsoever?

    Is he really trying to stay out of the PAPS way, so no one can throw out questions like “Where’s Angie”?

    If she doesn’t show up..that will be the FIRST questions at the press conferences after the movie premiere.

    No one is going to ask him anything about the movie, just all about his personal life, like IS it true you and Angelina have broken up? Where are the kids? Who is watching them while Angelina is staying at the Waldrof, and you’re here in france…..

    Reply
  15. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:57 pm

    @Nicole:
    Because she is spitting, cussing and calling names. Tell-tail signs.

    Reply
  16. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    @Nicole: Ah, am now catching up w/ you. I want to say something. I wish that you and Keane could get along. But, you have your opinions and she has hers. It’s easy to get caught up in defending, as well as pointing out another’s possible misperceptions. I feel that I can say this to you because, in several ways, I’ve agreed w/ your take on some of what had/has been written about AJ and BP, and we share the MSNBC interest as well, which I love. I’ve also enjoyed posting to Keane despite the recent difficulties. BUT….that’s the end of my meddling.

    Re: your response to the recent sightings/non-sightings of Mr. Pitt…I agree. Who the hell knows where he is? Other than those who are w/ him. And, to be bit “snarky”, maybe BP doesn’t know where he is, either? (Shame on you, SZ……petty, petty.)

    Hope you had a nice visit w/ the family? Was that what you wrote elsewhere?

    Reply
  17. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:03 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    LOL.

    @DonnaInMichigan:
    “Is he really trying to stay out of the PAPS way, so no one can throw out questions like “Where’s Angie”?”

    Well, that could be. Maybe he only wants to have to go through it once, on the red carpet, if she doesn’t show. It will be quick there….not too invasive….he hopes. jmo. I think it’s true, if she doesn’t show no one will ask about the movie….unless they are being polite.

    Reply
  18. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    @SZ:
    Sometimes it does seem like he may not know where he is….or maybe he’s bonking himself on the head “wake-up! what is this nightmare I am in?”…that’s how I would be feeling anyway. Tweet…tweet…..tweet…..where. am. I …?

    Reply
  19. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    @Z:
    Hey Z – I’m totally with you here! These are loon-e-toons! If they don’t like what’s here – don’t come here FOOLS!! Brad is in Cannes alone, for the first time in, what, 3 years? Angelina cannot stay away from the spotlight, unless something else huge is going on. Oh, and yeah, SALT, can’t spare her for a few??? Please, she may still show up, for an hour or two – But, man, don’t the loonie toons come out when they don’t need to visit or comment at all??? Morons!!!

    Reply
  20. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    @Z: It’s interesting. Loved your “tweet’s”, by the way. Last year I saw a pic of BP and AJ in Vegas at the major fight (don’t follow boxing so I don’t know who fought) One pic was a mid close-up. I looked at his eyes and thought two things: 1) He’s stoned. 2) He looks as if he’s stunned about something. Al the time I wasn’t thinking that anything was amiss, and I wasn’t thinking negative things about AJ. But, his eyes were almost saying “What have I gotten myself into?” Within a few weeks, I believe it was, the news came out that AJ was preggy w/ twins.

    Reply
  21. DebFrmHell said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    @Z:
    …and why am I in this handbasket?!?!

    LOL!

    Reply
  22. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    @SZ:
    I agree. Did you watch the Oscars this year, when BP & AJ were sitting next to each other?? Not once, did they show ‘any’ affection at all. No holding hands, no loving looks at each other, NADA. They looked like 2 strangers just sitting next to each other. But, if you looked at other couples there was ‘interaction’, looks and holding hands. Big time clue there!!!

    Reply
  23. justhelping said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    Wow, is there a full loon tonight. Came out of the gates quick. IMO, this is just the beginning, Ian is not going to give it all at once.

    Reply
  24. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    @justhelping:
    Oh yeah, came out of the gates RIGHT AWAY!!! Sick.

    Reply
  25. DebFrmHell said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    @N’other Name:
    HAHAHA! They must be checking back and hitting the refresh key more often than the regulars…

    Reply
  26. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    RIGHT!! And, if I’m ever on a site that I don’t agree with – DONE – I don’t have the time nor the inclination to post anything negative. I just MOVE ON!! These loons are ALWAYS checking this site & changing their names also. Obviously, they don’t have a life!!!

    Reply
  27. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    @SZ:

    Hey SZ . How are you tonight ? Yes . My mom and sisters came to visit us for a few days. I had fun but, was exhausted on Sunday evening . I agree it’s easy to get caught up in defending . I also don’t think you need to feel like you have to constantly explain & defend your work history . I’m enjoying your post and I don’t think I’m alone. Just shake the haters off and keep postin. Don’t even get into entertaining those type of questions about glitches in your work history etc.. Every time you answer to that type of probing it will just lead to another question or a post twisting what you previously stated. It’s just a receipe for stirring the pot. You know what the leads to . They already don’t agree with your opinions and the more you put yourself out there. Some will just try to find anything to discredit you . I hope you understand where I’m coming from . I just don’t like seeing that happening to you ! I wasn’t around earlier . I arrived home not that long ago and read your posts. So did you read my post about my sun , ascending and chinese zodiac sign ? Apparently we do have a lil bit more in common besides MSNBC an views on Brangelina . :)

    Re: Brangelina-I think this “where is Brangelina” and if they will attend CANNES together hype is all for promotion of Brad’s new movie. They are very savvy. They know how to make it all about Brangie . Oh yes, I wanted to get with you on Ian’s interviews with Paula and Noah . A few things I noticed. But, I will post on that in a bit. Just wanted to get you take on this “where is Brangie hype”.

    @ Z-I forget to say in my previous post to you.. How are you tonight ? Have you been watching Chris, Keith and Rachel on MSNBC ? I’m about to turn to MSNBC now.. :)

    Reply
  28. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:37 pm

    @N’other Name:
    BTW, they’re not that smart either, can you tell????

    Reply
  29. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    LOL……………..that was soooo funny!!! Exactly! If anyone is in a handbasket…….

    Reply
  30. TobyKat said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    The Today show will be interviewing Brad Pitt tomorrrow from Cannes. Maybe he’ll have something remotely interesting to say……
    It was unclear at press time if the couple’s six children – including baby twins Vivienne and Knox — would be making the trip to join papa Pitt, however, he may reveal more details about the plans of Hollywood’s most watched family when he sits down for an interview with NBC’s “Today” show on Tuesday.

    Reply
  31. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:48 pm

    The Today show will be interviewing Brad Pitt tomorrrow from Cannes. Maybe he’ll have something remotely interesting to say……

    LOL.

    Reply
  32. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    A full loon!! lol…that was funny, too.

    @SZ:
    Yeah! Well you clued in sooner than I did…my big clue in was the Oscars this year. And he has been wearing sunglasses constantly…hiding those stoned eyes, if you ask me. Sometimes he has those yellow-brown ones one and you can see his eyes through the glasses…stoned.

    Reply
  33. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    @TobyKat:
    Yeah, and I’m thinking that he will do the ‘PR’ thing, ’cause that’s what he does – until he makes his move. He’s not going to ‘blow’ the lid off of anything at Cannes, but he will be the diplomat that is required of him. That’s my take on this! JMO!

    Reply
  34. Deeca said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    Brangelina was crucified on Chelsea Lately tonight. I mean really truly ripped up. LOL

    Reply
  35. Ken said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    All this hype! They want this so they can make a grand entrance then for days those stupid blogs will be posting their pics everywhere making me feel ill… Just ignore them already and talk about someone else.

    Reply
  36. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    @Deeca:
    Whoa – there’s going to do a ‘repeat’ in about 4 minutes on Chelsea – really, really hope it’s the same show as you watched. Gotta go and see if this is the same show! Thanks for that info!!

    Reply
  37. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    @Nicole:
    I don’t have cable. Which is a pain sometimes….but we don’t care that much…so we never bothered to get it. Have cable internet…lol. I should do some internet searches.

    @N’other Name:
    No, the majority don’t seem smart…I wonder if they are mostly very young? Or somewhat young?

    Reply
  38. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    @Ken:

    That’s kinda what I was thinking.. Just hype to promote Brad’s new movie.

    Reply
  39. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:01 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Yeah, it ain’t over until their PR people say it’s over…..or until they have had enough. Oh yeah, they don’t have PR people……they are flying by the seat of their pants.

    @Deeca:
    What is Chelsea Lately and what was said? So curious. : )

    Reply
  40. DebFrmHell said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:01 pm

    Where is Brangie? has turned into a where’s Waldo kind of game…LOL!

    I almost feel sorry for QT who wants the focus to be on his film. ALMOST. He should have forseen that when you hire BPitt, you get AJ, too, plus whatever drama they are creating. There will be no focus on the film. Not that that matters to me. I don’t like QT films.

    When they brought the whole family to Japan for the CCOBB Brad got kicked to the curb, they all wanted to see AJ, and Cate B who freaking STARRED in the movie didn’t even show nor was she mentioned in my memory.

    Reply
  41. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    @N’other Name: Yeah, I did. On another thread when I first began posting, I mentioned how they were very different than they had been during the other award shows. That’s when I really began to wonder what was going on. I had read that AJ was angry w/ BP because he didn’t want to show the usual PDA for JA’s sake. BP, IMO, is also media savvy and would know that much negative nuzz from JA lovers would make him look “bad” to be holding hands w/ AJ while sitting in front row, only a few people down, from JA, as well as when she had to present in front of them. He may have been insensitive in the early days to JA’s feelings, but this was the first-ever public appearance for all concerned.

    By the way, I don’t dislike JA, but I felt that she overcompensated that night w/ John Mayer. Body language. Anyone who wants to can look up pics of how JA literally clung to him, whereas he just looked like a “deer in the headlights” and didn’t reciprocate. I understand that she needed someone to cling to that night for various reasons, but IMO it was TOO much. She now seems to be less needy. That’s far more attractive in general.

    Reply
  42. Deeca said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    @N’other Name:

    Damn its a rerun. She really hates Brangelina. I hope its rerun on the later episode.

    Reply
  43. TobyKat said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Oh, he’ll totally tow the line. I’m just hoping they ask him if Angie will be joining him. I just want them to ask that one freaking question. Not only do i want to know what he’ll say but I’d love to see his expression and body language.

    Reply
  44. DebFrmHell said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    @Deeca:
    Maybe to be shown on YouTube later on in the week? One can hope.

    Reply
  45. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    @Z:
    I’m guessing that they are not that educated, not even young necessarly. Maybe they are part of the AJ loons (obviously) or employees, whatever! And why now?? ‘Cause Brad showed up at Cannes alone? But, wow, this is the first time (as DebFrmHell said) that they were ALL right out of the gate from the start. Isn’t something a little suspicious here???

    P.S. I’m posting here and still beginning to watch ‘Chelsea’ – man, I hope this is the right episode!!!

    Reply
  46. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    @Nicole: I think I missed the astrology info. I’ll go back and check it out… By the way, a few minutes ago I went back to the other thread and read your kind post. Ya’ know, I have a “problem” about explaining myself. You sound like a few of my friends and a few of the therapists I’ve seen. Hahahahaha. I wish I didn’t feel like I need to explain myself to anyone. Fatal flaw.

    Reply
  47. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    @TobyKat:
    Oh, yeah, can’t wait to watch his expression (and explanation). Still waiting for Chelsea to ‘rip’ Brangie. Maybe, I’m on the wrong episode. Yikes, I want this one to be the BRANGIE one. Will let you guys know!

    Reply
  48. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @N’other Name:
    I found Chelsea on the internet…..is it on TV, too?

    Reply
  49. TobyKat said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @Deeca:
    I love Chelsea. i watch her every night. She basically said that there are rumours of them splitting, flat out called AJ a bitch and said this is what happens when you have six kids in six years. Ken baker from US weekly was on the panel. He just said something to the effect that Karma is not on her side…..

    Reply
  50. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    @Z:

    I’m gonna have to get you some links from youtube and Huffington post. I think you will enjoy Keith calling out BILL-O the clown and Rusty Limbaugh . LOL

    Reply
  51. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    @SZ:
    Hey, I’m on a commercial break here from ‘Chelsea’. BTW, if you are a ‘regular’ on here, no need to explain yourself. We’re all friends here, except for the ‘loonies’. Anyone notice that the loonies haven’t posted anything really recently – and I’m talking about less than an hour here.

    Reply
  52. Deeca said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:14 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Toby its a rerun. They tend not to re-air the episode right afterwards. Try the much later episode.

    Reply
  53. Deeca said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @Deeca:

    OOPS replied to the wrong person.

    Yeah Tobi that was the episode. I never heard then talk about Brangie like that before. LOL

    Reply
  54. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @Z:
    I’m checking here, Z, just checking. Oh, yeah, it’s on TV, every episode. Right now, she’s talking about Paula Abdul. WTF! Don’t even care about PA. We’ll see, typing and watching at the same time. Otherwise, I’ll be checking U-Tube. Hmmm. We’ll see and I’ll report back.

    Reply
  55. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:16 pm

    @SZ:

    Aww. You are too funny ! I have to say that night of the award ceremony John Mayer looked really handsome. I really didn’t notice if Jen was over compensating with extra clinginess . But, it’s possible .
    I should have looked at more pics. I didn’t really look at any of Brangie either .

    Reply
  56. Deeca said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:16 pm

    @Deeca:

    Ugh I wish there was an edit function or either that I need to remove my contacts.

    Reply
  57. Deeca said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    @N’other Name:

    N’Other name you are watching a rerun from a few weeks ago. I wasn’t lying. Toby saw what I saw.

    Reply
  58. DebFrmHell said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    @SZ:
    Sweetie, I just wish you well.

    Just a reminder. It is only the internet. I could, if I had the inkling, go thru google maps, look at advertising for the area, describe in detail the area and convince you I had been there. Same with credentials. The last time I looked the only person on the boards that is willing to put up any creds with a wiki page or whatnot is Ian Halpern. Everyone one else is equal. Anonymous but with screen names. Easily traceable screen names. ((I know I have googled myself after a poster on JJ used my real name there)) It is not mysterious. It is just the web.

    Reply
  59. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    @Deeca:
    Arrghh!! Are you kidding me? I know you meant to reply to Tobi – but I’m watching the WRONG episode??!! Yikes!!

    Reply
  60. TobyKat said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    @Z:
    Chelsea is on Mon thru Fri at 10:00 Central Time. The show is a half of an hour and is live i believe. At 11:00 they have Chelsea on again but that show is a repeat. So, you may be able to see tonights show repeated tomorrow at 11:00 (central time)

    Reply
  61. SZ said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    @N’other Name: Here I go explaining myself (heh heh). I’ve just become a regular — very recently. I may be overcompensating for all of the screaming I’ve done in the past at people. Chuckle.

    Reply
  62. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    @Nicole:

    Okay … I have to ask but, what is Chelsea ? I know the Chelsea area in Manhattan and the movie . Please forgive ..

    Reply
  63. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    @Deeca:
    OK, you’re right! I’m watching for nothing. Now they have someone from ‘Gossip Girl’, which means nothing to me. Oh, well. Nothing informative at all. What a fr’n WASTE!!!

    Reply
  64. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    @Nicole:
    LOL….Limbaugh…not my favorite person. My brother use to repeat him word for word….I felt cornered half the time. Ugh…it was excruciating. I started avoiding my brother….”Hi…gotta go!”.

    @N’other Name:
    So true that they were right here, as if waiting…..very strange! Unless it was all one person…hmmmm.

    Reply
  65. TobyKat said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    @Nicole:
    Chelsea is Chelsea Handler. She is a female comic. She was also on girls behaving badly. She does not censor herself and doesn’t kiss up to the celebrities. The show is on E Entertainment and is called The Chelsea Handler Show. It’s great, very funny, i love it.

    Reply
  66. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    @Nicole:
    Nicole, the show is called ‘Chelsea Lately’, the host is Chelsea Handler and she’s a comedienne. It is on the ‘E!’ channel. On cable. Don’t know if you get that channel, but google it. Really, really funny show, with very good guests.

    Reply
  67. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    @TobyKat:
    Wow! She called her a bitch! I’m sure she’s not the only one in LA that feels that way….like all the cheated on wives and gf’s for example.

    Reply
  68. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:26 pm

    @N’other Name:
    If you get a link, please post it. : )

    Reply
  69. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    @SZ:
    Hey, you are now a ‘friend’ here. Ya’ don’t have to overcompensate for anything. Glad to have you here!!!

    Reply
  70. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    @Z:

    LOL ! An to think he’s a voice a big voice in the GOP . I just don’t understand why . He’s an angry, donut-eating ASSHAT . I get a headache even listening to snippets of him.

    Reply
  71. Nicole said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:30 pm

    Thank you N’other Name and TobyKat ! I will see if she’s still on now. I need some laughs and snark !

    Reply
  72. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    @Z:
    I’m looking Z. If I find anything, will let you know. Hey, do any of you guys get HULU.com. I was trying to send something so ‘hysterical’ to both Canada and the UK, but, apparently, it’s only being offered in the U.S. I will try that also!

    Reply
  73. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:36 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Speaking of Gossip Girl…and things like that….what is Ted’s obsession w/ Twilight?? Because it sells right now?

    Nicole, I just found it on E! Chelsea Lately is a show…a comedienne…pretty funny…

    Reply
  74. ml said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    @Jodie:
    baaa ahaaaaha ha ha!

    Reply
  75. ml said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    @SZ:

    wow thanks, sz. didnt know what i wrote was so important to you.

    Reply
  76. Z said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    @Nicole:
    Me, too…I can’t believe anyone in the GOP respects him….maybe it’s because he has a big mouth (that he is paid attention to at all?)? I wonder if SZ remembers Greaseman…(since she was a DJ) ugh! Another one my brother use to copy verbatim. It was sooo bad. It’s bad enough coming from the original butt-head….not that my brother is a butt-head…but…..lol..oh nevermind. lol

    Reply
  77. N'other Name said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    @Z:
    I think that Ted C. has a LOT of really young readers and they are so ‘obsessed’ with this Twilight thing. I just skip over that, ’cause, for the life of me, I do NOT care!!! He’s just going where is audience wants to go. JMO! Ok, I’m right about to go to bed, ’cause of an early, early meeting that I should have been preparing for, but this site is JUST SO MUCH FUN, but I really do have to get my act together for this meeting.

    So, I will do my research on this Chelsea thing on UTube or Hulu tomorrow night. But, if you guys have some time tonight or tomorrow during the day – let me know! XOXO

    Reply
  78. TobyKat said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    okay, for all of you late night bloggers that need a good laugh. Don’t know if you saw this video called Angelina jolie homewrecker. WARNING it is raunchy so if you are easily offended don’t watch it. Copy and paste below link into your browser. It has allot of foul language and again is raunchy but it is funny. if U do watch wait until the very end when BBT pops up.
    http://doitlater.com/showFlash.php?16

    Reply
  79. benjaminbutton14 said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    bb14. Why would Brad be seen with another woman, maybe he is doing a interview. But if he is that picture I can’t see him. Maybe Ange isn’t coming. I don’t think it is anything romantic otherwise why would he be in the publics eye you wouldn’t imagine he would want anymore gossip than what is going around now. I think this could be innocent, but then again we’ll wait and see.

    Reply
  80. benjaminbutton14 said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    @N’other Name:
    bb14. I read that the plan was to keep his hand busy and away from the grabbin Ange. Everywhere she goes she is always grabbin his hand or arm. I think it went like this== that he didn’t want Jen to be jealous and I’m sure that Ange would have grabbed his hand for all its worth after all they were sitting right in front. Poor Jen I don’t think she knew where to look but she did well to get thru.

    Reply
  81. benjaminbutton14 said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:03 am

    @TobyKat:
    bb14. He’s probably told them which questions not to ask that’s what they normally do as to which subject to keep off. He will only talk about his movie

    Reply
  82. N'other Name said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:07 am

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Ya’ know what?? I thought the same thing at first. That they didn’t want to ‘offend’ JA, especially as they placed her RIGHT in front of the two of them. And JA did seem a little nervous – and who wouldn’t be?? However, I do think there was something else going on there aside from JA appearing on the stage with Jack Black. I really did feel for JA. Still, it did seem like something was off from the start. JMO, but I do agree with your assessment, as I really did have the same thought. But I thought, could ya’ even look once at each other?? Could be wrong here, but once again, I do agree with your assessment. Who on earth knows, until it all comes out in the wash! Hmmm.

    Reply
  83. TobyKat said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:10 am

    @benjaminbutton14:
    True, if the interviewer does not ask one question about AJ or the kids then we’ll all know that the interview had a pre-approved questions list or a clause that prohibited certain questions. No journalist in their right mind wouldn’t ask questions about his family.

    Reply
  84. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:16 am

    @N’other Name:
    Well, makes sense….he has to go were the audience wants to I would think. Esp. if he can’t say much about Brange……I thought someone said they had a deal with E! Although, Chelsea is on E!…and she isn’t sticking to the rules, if those are the rules…

    @TobyKat:
    This was funny….esp. the cut out people.

    Reply
  85. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:22 am

    @Z:
    @N’other Name:
    Aaahhh MAN!!!!! Did I miss everyone AGAIN???? I’ve been too busy at work to post and this evening my daughter and I went to the local animal shelter for a volunteers’ orientation. It’s 9:22 p.m., the sun is still up on this beautiful Alaskan day … and NO ONE IS HERE TO TALK TO!!! Boooo hooooo.

    Reply
  86. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:23 am

    @benjaminbutton14:
    Yeah, we need to pay attention to the unsaid………unless they don’t ask about AJ at all…and he could set it up that way.

    @TobyKat:
    So true….the only reason they wouldn’t ask, is because they weren’t allowed.

    @N’other Name:
    I saw the interview before they went in…it was just weird. AJ looked stoned or spaced out. And the way they were reacting/responding to each other and the interviewer was strange. Uncomfortable….AJ looked stoned in all the video’s or pics, I saw…if not stoned – stone-faced & spaced.

    Reply
  87. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:24 am

    @Z:
    I have been totally bored at E! Even Ted is boring these days with all that Twilight twitter junk! ADORABLE kids in the movie, but I’m not into kids! LOL

    Reply
  88. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:26 am

    @Togi:
    Hi Hon! You guys are so good to do the volunteer work! I really want to see if I can hook up with a homeless shelter and watch people’s pets while they are transitioning out of abusive homes. Things need to settle here first…with the new pup, etc. But I would really feel like I was helping if I could do that.

    Reply
  89. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:27 am

    @Togi:
    Yeah, kids are so passe…lol. For me anyway! Except my kid. : ) I only check over there now and then…see tons of Twilight stuff and leave.

    Reply
  90. ffleur said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:31 am

    Hi Z: just read your message on the last thread about your present doctor formerly working as a chemist. Does that mean a chemist in a lab? Because in England a chemist is what we call a pharmacist.

    Hi SZ: thanks for your kind words on the last thread. Yes I totally understand the unhealthy and unrealistic expectations of women in Hweird to have very thin bodies. In fact, in the world. Its very unfair and not fun!

    Reply
  91. N'other Name said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:33 am

    @Togi:
    @Z:
    Ah, Togi, I’m 3 hours ahead of you and I should now be in bed!!! I get on the site late ’cause I get home late from work. Otherwise, I would be here earlier!

    Z – I totally agree. They looked weird before they even went into the venue. She looked TOTALLY stonefaced and they were not even interacting at all during the whole awards. They were ‘totally’ out of sync – and, believe me, I don’t think AJ would have given an ‘eff’ about JA. She would be wrapping herself all over BP just to show the world and JA that she had her man!! JMO!! Wow, I should be in bed, but I’m addicted to this site. Stop myself, to me!!!!

    Reply
  92. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:44 am

    @Z:
    I didn’t catch the entrance of Brangie on the red carpet at the Oscars, but my sister’s comment on it later was “Boy, I sure wouldn’t have wanted to be Brad Pitt that night, she looked like she was seriously pissed off at something and probably spent the ride there and back ripping his face off”.

    I also agree with N’other in that AJ couldn’t give a rat’s ass about Jen’s feelings, otherwise she wouldn’t have been screwing her husband to start with.

    Reply
  93. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:44 am

    @N’other Name:
    Heya! After all Ian’s been giving us over the past month or so, I’m gonna be SICK if these two nut jobs (AJ & BP) show up at Cannes and play “business as usual” for the rest of the world to see. B-A-R-F!

    Z: Yeah … just another thing I’ve volunteered my time for!!!! The hubby gets a little tired of my never-ending causes! LOL But, we can’t adopt anymore furry children … we already have a house full. And we LOVE animals … especially cats. And cats are the ones who receive the least in shelters. They really get the short end of the stick, I’m afraid. Soooooooo … we’re going to help out any way we can. I honestly believe that if EVERYONE volunteered to help out SOME cause, this would be a much better world. My boss provides free legal services to people who can’t afford it. He’s got the hugest heart for people. Makes NO MONEY, but I’ve told him I’m going to nominate him for Extreme Makeover, the Home Addition!!!!!

    Reply
  94. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:45 am

    @ffleur:
    OH, he is British, I think??? I didn’t ask him, but he has a little accent (for me, not you : )). But he is my Lyme disease doc and he is planning on actually doing some stuff in the lab ….working w/ the bacteria – so I don’t know? That is interesting! Thanks for the info. : )

    And yeah, the whole body thing stinks. Because the expectations coming out of HW (and from mags) are spreading like a disease all over the world…and have been for years. Someone up here (kind of loony, but anyway) said size 2 is not tiny. It is just that kind of thinking that needs to be squashed.

    @N’other Name:
    I should be in bed, too…bad & addicted! Yeah, something was wrong @ the Oscars….I really think those twins were her (or their?) attempt at reconciliation…kids don’t fix things!! Morons. And yeah, whether AJ was still in love or not, if she could have, I really believe she’d be all over him to gloat. She really seems like the vindictive type…not kind.

    Reply
  95. topbrit said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:46 am

    @ loons going into meltdown – are you posting here more and more out of desperation because your two favourite twats haven’t been seen out and about gracing the world and blessing us common people lately mmm?……except for staged uncomfortable photo-ops.btw just curious(not you just curious i’m just curious)if we on here are so pathetic for believing stuff we don’t see proof for aren’t you ‘inmates’ twice as pathetic as you believe everything you read,hear,smell,sense,presume on these two pricks,without any proof whatsover as long as it is POSITIVE! fuck off with your double standards1

    Reply
  96. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:49 am

    @Canuck:
    I only saw pictures … and boy what a sour face! Ya know … I actually LIKED the old AJ. She was so kookie and off-beat. Really out there. But I thought she was funny, in an odd way. Then somewhere along the line, she got that “smug” look y’all talk about. Booooo hisssss! Did you ever notice that when the entire family was going through the airport in Japan … EVERYONE was unhappy (BP, ALL the kids) … except AJ. He had a big ol’ smile on her face while everyone else was just miserable. I thought that was really bad. I sure as heck wouldn’t be smiling if all my kids were upset.

    Reply
  97. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:51 am

    @Togi:
    I need to clarify that MY DAUGHTER and I love cats … NOT my hubby. He does NOT love cats … at ALL! Just in case anyone catches me contradicting myself at a later date! LOL

    Reply
  98. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:53 am

    @Canuck:
    Interesting about your sister’s comment…and right on! She could have been totally pissed off. There are leaks that they fight all the time anyway. Brad said (on Oprah?) that he didn’t fight with AJ anymore, because “I’m not going to be with this person forever”. I thought that was very weird!! “This person”?!?!

    @Togi:
    If they do we will be all over the body language…lol. And what is not said.

    That is soooo cool about the volunteering and I agree, the world would be a better place if everyone did. We want to get a kitty…and will probably in a few months. I love cats, too. Your boss sounds incredible!

    Reply
  99. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:59 am

    @Togi:
    Geez, exactly. Well, she knows how to fake it. But those kids always look unhappy…..I was looking at pics of Maddox as a baby…he was giggly and smiley. It makes me sad to see his angry face now.

    LOL….my husband doesn’t like cats either…but he tries. He is loving our pup, though. And no contradicting! Just kidding…lol.

    Reply
  100. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:00 am

    @Z:
    I think that IF they are there together, they will have made the choice to put up a united front, for whatever reason they believe it to be in their own best interests. I just think if they do make that decision, they will put on the act of their lifetimes.

    and my boss is a complete NUT! In a hilarious way.

    Reply
  101. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:05 am

    @Z:
    Well, who could NOT love a pup??? (oh … wait a minute … don’t answer that question!!!!!) LOL Puppies are the cutest little doofusses ever!

    Reply
  102. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:06 am

    @Togi:
    I’m sure she realizes that if she doesn’t show up, Cannes is going to be all about Angie this year, rather than Brangie. It will be telling to see which option she decides is more attractive.

    Reply
  103. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:06 am

    @topbrit:
    They believe everything, when it has been proven that AJ has deals with different mags for only positive press (People, for instance)…that is a fact. She’s a fake. Togi, I think you are right, she didn’t use to be…she may have done some of it to shock people and get attention….but at least it wasn’t his whole humanitarian/Saint thing.
    @Togi:
    Yeah, I agree. But can they act that well? It was pretty transparent at the Oscars. That is so cool that you have a boss like that.

    Reply
  104. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:08 am

    @topbrit:
    And why, oh why would they be the very first people to post on a new thread. Oh … I know … because we all need to know ahead of time just how STUPID we are, right??????? ;-) Well, I’m pretty good about noting my own personal weaknesses without an anonymous poster pointing them out! Haaa haaa

    Reply
  105. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:10 am

    @Togi:
    Ours can be so clumsy….but adorable. My husband and son taught her to go down the slide…lol.

    @Canuck:
    Good point! She is probably ready for Angie over Brangie. Interesting. I wonder if she’s worried about losing her good rep (which isn’t that good). I bet she wouldn’t be able to resist the attention, though.

    Reply
  106. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:14 am

    @Togi:
    LOL…good one. : )

    Maybe the mysterious lady in Cannes is his divorce lawyer.

    Reply
  107. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:15 am

    @Z:
    Baaa haaaaa on the “But can they act that well?” question. I have to admit that until he hooked up with AJ I was a huge BP fan. And as much as I didn’t want to like it, I did like MAMS. I know … I suck! Sorry. But I liked it and I thought especially Brad was funny in it. AJ wasn’t funny, but I really though BP. I haven’t seen her do anything too impressive. All those bad-a_ _ characters get really boring. She’s definitely no Daniel Craig as 007, that’s for sure! I saw her in the Bone Collecter with Denzel and MAMS. I think that’s it. She does rely very heavily on that sexy snear and how dumb is that. Bone Collector was a weird movie but I think I remember liking it. I didn’t know anything about her then. So I don’t know about their acting ability. She might be able to fake it, but I don’t think BP will. I think he’s too much of a heart-on-his-sleeve kinda guy. Personally, if they go through with this farce I AM going to barf!!!! No idle threats!!!!

    Reply
  108. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    @Togi:
    I didn’t see MAMS. But could see how he could be funny. I don’t think she can make fun of herself….or be funny at all for that matter. I saw Girl Interrupted…but had no idea who she was. I watched it because it was suppose to be good…and I think it was, but it’s been a while. Yeah, the sexy sneer is dumb!…lol. She is just so annoying to me. Ugh. I saw Bone Collector and barely remember it. My memory is terrible. I remember thinking she was weird in Bone Collector…but still not knowing who she was. He can talk about the kids throwing spaghetti again…lol. Well, I wouldn’t want you to have to barf!!

    Reply
  109. Kate said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:32 am

    I just got in and thought I would check in before going to be, Miss 9 uses her pics as a clue, but for the life of me I can not place that pic, it looks like tourists tailgaiting at Cannes. lol

    TTL Nite folksm maybe it just means he is in Cannes.

    Reply
  110. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    @Z:
    I don’t wanna barf, either! Not my favorite thing to do if you catch my drift!

    So, are you thinking there is no “mystery woman?” Heck, I would be a mystery woman, for crying out loud! haaa haaa! The world i full of us no bodies. If it were the mysterious Sudanese woman, the press would be alllll over that!

    Reply
  111. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:36 am

    @Kate:
    That’s all I could gather from it, too. Though I did like some of the jokes I read about Brad looking really old in the pic!!!! Haaaa haaa.

    Reply
  112. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:37 am

    @Kate:
    Oh … I might add that the picture looks like it is of people lining up early to wait for the red carpet walk of fame. So maybe Ms. 9 cents is saying that we have to wait and see what’s going to happen, just like the folks sitting there in their chairs.

    Reply
  113. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:43 am

    @Togi:
    “If it were the mysterious Sudanese woman, the press would be alllll over that!” That’s what I was thinking…and if not the press, that Ian, at least.

    @Togi:
    Hey, that’s a good thought! It looks like the metal zig-zag line container you have to wait in at Disneyland or something.

    Reply
  114. ffleur said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:51 am

    @Z: I didn’t word my sentence very well. It sounded like I’m British when in fact I’m not – I just play one on TV (drum beat beat). Anyway a chemist is a pharmacist in England so your doctor could come from there and have been a pharmacist/chemist.

    Reply
  115. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:51 am

    @Togi:
    Maybe the guy under the dark blue umbrella is IAN.

    Reply
  116. Chris G. said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:00 am

    @Kate:
    The picture used is from a May 13th article in Daily Mail, it is nothing more than illustrating the “poor pavement” of the area compared to other years… Hopefully it wasn’t put on here to insinuate that Brad is the guy under the umbrella as some have already been led to believe, because that simply is not the case.

    http://tinyurl.com/oxuuz2

    Reply
  117. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:00 am

    @ffleur:
    It sounds like it…..and he sounds like it….lol. Anyway, good info to have. : ) Thanks.

    Reply
  118. benjaminbutton14 said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:01 am

    bb14 Is Brad supposed to be in this picture??? Do we know what nationality she is if there is a she. I don’t think it is the sudanese woman I doubt whether she would even turn up. Probably all talk and no action. I somehow think that Ange probably knows that everybody will be wondering when and if she will turn up. Then all the grand spotlight will be on her arrival. How pathetic. To quote Ian “Shit will go down” I saw the trailers of “Inglorious Basterds” definately not my type of movie Brad looks bloody awful in it. I don’t think it opens till August in Australia.

    Reply
  119. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:10 am

    @Chris G.:
    Good find

    Reply
  120. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:12 am

    The guy under the umbrella has an earring…so is it a woman? (Click on the pic to make it larger).

    I don’t think Brad is in the pic….it’s a sidewalk shot…..are those people under the umbrellas camped out to see the celebs. BB14, I heard it opens in the US in August, too. And I agree, pathetic Jolie will probably come last minute to get her publicity in. On the other post Keane mentioned Aung San Suu Kyi…I did some research on her…what a remarkable woman. She puts AJ’s “humanitarian” crap to shame. Really. ASSK has a pure heart…amazing.

    Reply
  121. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:20 am

    DebFrmHell said on May 18th, 2009 at 11:18 pm
    @SZ:
    Sweetie, I just wish you well.

    Just a reminder. It is only the internet. I could, if I had the inkling, go thru google maps, look at advertising for the area, describe in detail the area and convince you I had been there. Same with credentials. The last time I looked the only person on the boards that is willing to put up any creds with a wiki page or whatnot is Ian Halpern. Everyone one else is equal. Anonymous but with screen names. Easily traceable screen names. ((I know I have googled myself after a poster on JJ used my real name there)) It is not mysterious. It is just the web.

    @DebFrmHell: Yes, anyone can gather info and pretend to be someone else, etc. I’m just wondering your intent in mentioning Ian as the only one “willing” to put up creds. Becuz this is his site, I would think he’d be putting up creds. I just got caught up in defending myself and offered the Google suggestion because it would show that everything I’ve written about my career(s) is true. Oh well?

    By the way, how did someone get your name and post it on JJ? Do tell. Thanks.

    Reply
  122. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:23 am

    @Deeca:
    Hey Guys just wanted to add something regarding Chelsea – she is good friends with JA which is one reason she dislikes AJ. I love Chelsea!! she says what we all want to say lol. Oh and in oz on the tv they outed Fergie – just wondering if she was the one involved with AJ or should there be NO DOUBT? I dont think BP is in that picture it looks like a plain shot of Cannes. Anyway, one of the mags here has printed that AJ has threatened to kill herself if BP leaves her. This is the same woman who stated she didnt need a man? she is a disgusting excuse for a mother. Emotional blackmail will not make her relationship stronger and to even threaten that with no concern for the children is disgraceful. Any mum knows that you put your kids first and most of us will do anything to be there for our children. Parents divorce all the time and sometimes the kids benefit (if the adults behave in a mature fashion) its not ideal but better to seperate than be in a loveless relationship. Oh and as far as the loons go – is it a full moon?lol. Hope everyone is well x x x x Hi to Liin. apologies to all if there are any spelling errors!

    Reply
  123. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:24 am

    @Keane:
    @Kate:
    In my rather negative post to Ian I really shouldn’t have used either of your names. Won’t happen again.

    Reply
  124. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:29 am

    @Canuck:
    Baaa haaaaa! That’s funny.

    Reply
  125. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:32 am

    @MickeyB:
    LOL ” I dont think BP is in that picture it looks like a plain shot of Cannes. ” Nooo noo, no no no! Someone was JOKING when they said it looked like BP must have AGED in the photo … you know … a la CCOBB! (The older guy in the picture … ya know … ha haa haa!) Too funny. So THIS is how rumors get started. Z … wasn’t it YOU who said that?????

    Reply
  126. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:33 am

    I almost forgot! Perez Hilton writes a column for one of the Aussie mags and he disputes everything that Ian has said. He loves AJ and BP and quite obviously has a problem with JA. I just needed to get that off my chest! Take care and Gday Benjaminbutton14! x x x x

    Reply
  127. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:37 am

    @MickeyB:
    “Anyway, one of the mags here has printed that AJ has threatened to kill herself if BP leaves her. ”

    Didn’t she do that with Billy Bob?? And then he married her. Oy. Get thee to a mental hospital, is what I say to her. And Brad…leave. Couldn’t agree more, Mickey. She is so selfish…and this is more emotional blackmail, that apparently she’s famous for. Like getting pregnant to keep a man, for instance.

    Reply
  128. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:37 am

    @MickeyB:
    Hey there MickeyB … didn’t AJ supposedly threaten to bump herself off if BBT left her (or didn’t leave Laura D???) I thought I read that somewhere. Maybe I’m wrong, though. It has happened on occasion.

    Reply
  129. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:38 am

    @Z:
    OMG, Z … we were having a separated at birth moment, there!

    Reply
  130. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:40 am

    @Togi:
    I did mentioned he aged…lol…and someone else mentioned CCOBB….lol. Funny. Too hard to pass up, I guess. ; ) OK, bed time. Night, all!!

    Reply
  131. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:41 am

    @Togi:
    Where you thinking the same thing? (Notice I’m not in bed yet…lol)

    Reply
  132. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:42 am

    @Togi:
    Oh, I see!!!

    Reply
  133. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:43 am

    @Togi:
    If I remember correctly there were some other manipulative parallels, too…..just can’t remember them right now. She really is trash. : (((

    Reply
  134. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:49 am

    @Togi:
    @Z:
    Hello Togi and Z. You are both correct – she did threaten same with BBT. I just think its worse now cos of the kiddies! big thank you for pointing out the CCOBB moment – hilarious. I looked at the pic again. I have mentioned before that I am as dumb as dog poo! so I appreciate the help. lol. x x x x have a good sleep Z.

    Reply
  135. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:53 am

    @MickeyB:
    OMG … anyone who even REPORTEDLY acts like that with kids is ridiculous! Most moms don’t even allow themselves to get ILL, let alone threaten suicide! Think of all the things over the entirety of history that mothers have sacrificed out of love for their children. Personally, I gave up a world that was all about ME! Haaa haaa. Now, it’s all about my MINI-me.

    Reply
  136. Z said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:59 am

    @Togi:
    Now, it’s all about my MINI-me…………Aw!!! Now I’m really going to bed…night guys. ; )

    Reply
  137. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:52 am

    @Togi:
    Couldnt agree with you more! sacrifice is what its all about. And the Mini me comment so cute and so true. Gotta go and dinner with my beautiful family. AJ just makes me appreciate mine even more! x x x x

    Reply
  138. Liin said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:20 am

    @MickeyB:

    Hiya MiB, Hope you are well.
    You have my sincere sympathy that the skank Parasite Hilton spreads his crap over in Oz. RE. Him supporting AJ/BP as he was risen in the world, from a blogger sat in a cafe to something (he thinks) important, he supports those who can give him the most hits, as there are so many loons out there, he’s sticking with them. Hopefully not for much longer.
    Errrr, Ian or Perez – no contest.
    xx

    Reply
  139. meg said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:30 am

    Where is Sugar Ray?

    Reply
  140. meg said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:39 am

    Is Sugar Ray this other woman seen in Cannes with Brad? Is Brad one of the two men in the picture? LOL

    Reply
  141. chris said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:06 am

    @Liin:
    nooooo he’s so nice with them because bp and aj are both men !!! just jocking.

    Reply
  142. Liin said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:28 am

    @chris:

    Ha ha.. you could be right, I’m surprised Perez is not at Cannes, he pops up everwhere now.

    Reply
  143. keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:29 am

    @ SZ – so why on earth did u mention us in the 1st place, what on earth did that comment have 2 do with either of us at all? U addressed 1 of ur 1st comments 2 me re: why ur posts weren’t showing as well – why did u do that when it has nothing 2 do with me? And Kate has barely posted at all in the wk in which u have been commenting here so why pick her out, how do u know she is 1 of the regulars here?!

    Reply
  144. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:55 am

    @Liin:
    @chris:
    LOL Chris I think you might be on to something! PH gives me the poops! I am just so darn happy that I found this site and people like Liin. I think I have a slight addiction! Oh and Liin you will be happy to know that I have not taken the bait where the loons are concerned. I learnt my lesson last time. Still dont understand why they bother – they need to stick to their own site and leave our Ian alone!! lol. Hope you are well and that you had a good weekend ( not sure what day it is there – its Tuesday here, 820 pm) time zones are not my thing but then again I have never claimed to be super intelligent. In fact just the opposite. Most of our gossip mags now quote Ians site and other sources and I have to say I do enjoy getting the goss straight from this site. Oh and whenever PH says anything I just roll my eyes!
    @keane:
    Hi Keane – just wondering if you knew about Fergie being bi sexual and do you think there is any chance she could be AJs mystery woman?? I am trying to unlock the mystery but probably way off cos as previously stated I am as dumb as dog poo! hope you are ok. Love to all of you, going to watch Iron Chef America cos yes I think I am a little like Bobby Flay! ha ha x x x x no Im serious I am a damn fine cook!

    Reply
  145. Ray Catone said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:04 am

    @all – IUC has a team undercover at Cannes. We will be breaking stories soon. Te Amo, SRRC

    Reply
  146. Liin said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:25 am

    @MickeyB:
    Hiya Mib, you do make me smile……… us thickies have got to stick together. Just caught up will ALL the posts, the loons really went for it yesterday (or whatever day it was – bloody times zone), as someone pointed out, they are getting jittery as no pics of their beloved……
    just saw post from SR, hopefully they will give us some gossip as soon as poss – just a smidge to keep us going please…..xx

    Reply
  147. FRENCHIE said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:26 am

    I think that it’s pretty easy for PB to hide from the paps where he is. The hotel he’s allegedly staying at is about 10 km away from Cannes. As it’s location says, it is built on a cape (Cap) near Antibes. If you don’t know the location of the hotel, you’ll surely pass by it when driving on the coastal road connecting Cannes with Antibes, it’s that secluded. The screening at the gates is beyond thorough and taking photo’s from the water is impossible as the hotel rises high above it. Also, it is custom to take a helicopter from Nice airport to for example Cannes or Antibes. Believe me, on the Cote d’Azur they know how to treat, and hide, the high and mighty! Anyway, just my thoughts on why BP has not been seen.

    Reply
  148. well said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:36 am

    @SZ:

    You may want to put Keane on ‘ignore’ mode, like I did last week. She twisted around things I said, and came to some conclusions without knowing the full story, and when I wasn’t comfortable with sharing information, she accused me of being a plant. While I think she’s quite smart, I think she’s a bit paranoid. On one post, she thought I was part of some conspiracy, (being a plant), and I only posted when she ‘wasn’t actively posting’ like it was some effort on my part.

    Just be careful what personal information you impart with here. And don’t succumb to bullying.

    Reply
  149. HisHighness said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:41 am

    @all – I guarantee you a blockbuster is on the way today or tomorrow.

    Reply
  150. HadEnoughOfTheBull said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:45 am

    @keane:

    Keane, I believe you were asked by several to STFU with your questioning of fellow board members and insults. Please appease us. This is not YOUR board. Realize it.

    Reply
  151. sama said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:52 am

    Angelina Jolie is keen to quash speculation her relationship with Brad Pitt is on the rocks — she’s planning a big show of unity for the cameras, according to a new report.

    Despite previous reports Pitt and Jolie came to blows over whether the actress should appear on the red carpet with him at Cannes, Angelina will apparently be on Brad’s arm as he promotes his new movie, Inglourious Basterds, which premieres at the festival Wednesday.

    “Angelina is already planning a big show of unity for the cameras at Cannes,” a source tells Britain’s Grazia magazine. “This is what she does whenever there is a crisis. And, of course, it’s sending a big message to Brad’s ex-wife Jennifer Aniston that he’s not going anywhere.”

    Insiders also believe that Pitt is pining for his old his old life with former Friends star Aniston, who he divorced in 2005.

    “Life with Angelina must have become draining for Brad,” said the source. “Brad looks unhappy, she’s stressed out all the time, and it’s not good for anyone. His life with Jen was a lot more fun and simple than his life now.”

    Reply
  152. meg said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:03 am

    @sama:Brad’s life with any body than Joly would be more fun and simplier…

    Reply
  153. Peri said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:04 am

    I have a question for all of you with more celeb-studying experience than I.

    Is it the norm for publications to make such a big deal about which hotel a celeb is going to be staying? I’ve noticed in the last few days that it’s been made VERY public about where BP is staying.

    Maybe I’ve just not noticed this type of information before, but it just seemed so blatant to me, and I wondered if this could be a planned way to throw off the paps and the supposed pregnant woman from finding him where he is REALLY staying.

    Another thought… I almost hope AJ DOES show up. I think it would be MOST telling, to be able to study the two of them together, watch their body language and facial expressions, to see whom touches who, if either, and if intimately. I’d like to see if AJ truly has lost all this weight. I’d like get a gander at her “pregnant” (NOT) belly. I’d like to see if BP wears the necklace JA gave him for his birthday (though I guess with a tuxedo on, it would be tucked under his shirt or not worn at all, unless BP grows a set, wears it out front and center and in AJ’s face… wouldn’t that be a hoot?) I’d love to see them duck and dodge the pap and reporters, and I’d love to hear their answers when they are pinned down. Wondering if any of the pap and reporters will have the balls to publicly ask them about their marriage, or if it will all be the normal “polite” stuff so as not to risk the wrath of AJ after. BP is supposed to be on the Today show Wednesday morning… I’m guessing they won’t ask him any hard questions, either.

    Tomorrow won’t come fast enough.

    Reply
  154. well said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:11 am

    @Peri:Peri remember that they are actors first and foremost, and are quite skilled at make-believe, so I wouldn’t bet on judging the body language. I was astonished at how well he did at the Oscars. An interviewer asked them if they viewed this as ‘date night’ and AJ said yes, she likes to look at it this way. I saw the look on Brad’s face, he was searching for something to say and he just joked about causing a scene if he didn’t win an Oscar.

    After what that heinous bitch has done to him, I am amazed he can keep his food down at just the thought of standing beside her. The guy can act.

    Reply
  155. well said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:13 am

    @Peri:Oh, and mentioning the name of the hotel could be for a multitude of reasons…usually I’ve seen it when the hotel has comped the guest a suite in exchange for PR. But in this case I’m thinking the reasoning is that he was staying there alone and they (meaning Brad’s camp) wanted it to be known…

    Reply
  156. Peri said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:25 am

    @well:
    I don’t mean to sound as if I’m arguing with you on this point, I agree with you that they are actors and overall do a good job (BP’s best acting job ever), but I really thought they showed themselves for what they really are at the Oscars. The tension could be read all over both their faces on the red carpet and went JA was onstage, AJ had that fake smile plastered on so hard I thought her eyeballs were going to explode and BP looked terrified to move – if he smiled at JA, AJ would slap him right there… if he leaned in or looked to AJ, then he’d hurt AJ… he literally had the look of a deer caught in headlights. Isn’t this the awards show where he dogged AJ and answered some of Ryan Seacrest’s questions, too? I thought that was telling. I think they can act and fake it only to a certain depth. Body language -leaning in toward each other, instead of being on the other’s arm and yet leaning away… looking into each other’s eyes and smiling deeply, rather than the arm around the back or hands on the stomach and looking at the cameras, all that is telling.

    I hadn’t thought about BPs camp wanting it known he’s alone, that’s a good thought. What’s your opinion on why there’s been no photos of him so far, though? Now THAT would send a message.

    Reply
  157. Mama San said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    class=”replyTo” href=”#comment-25195″>@sama:
    Mornin all, Hi Sama, found the link to your post.
    http://www.showbizspy.com/article/186149/angelina-jolie-plots-show-of-unity-with-brad-pitt

    Reply
  158. well said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:33 am

    @Peri:No pics is just that he’s keeping a low profile. Low profile = no pics, which is why they make a point of ‘name of hotel and that he arrived alone’.

    True about the acting thing, there will still be some body language that’s hard to hide. I just don’t know how he can stand beside her.

    Reply
  159. Mama San said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:45 am

    @well:
    I would have to disagree with you in regards to body language on just this one photo of BP&AJ at the BAFTAS.
    The look on BP’s face is priceless.
    http://cdn.idontlikeyouinthatway.com//pictures/20090210/Brad%20Pitt%20Angelina%20Jolie%20BAFTA%20Awards/t/ajbp2thumb.jpg

    Reply
  160. Mama San said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:50 am

    @well:
    Another telling bit of body language between Kate W, and AJ at the 2009 Oscars, after Kate W, won.
    http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/m4/feb2009/9/8/Image_3_for_The_Reader_Between_the_Lines_gallery_86431974.jpg
    Good article too.

    Reply
  161. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:50 am

    @ HadEnoughoftheBull and well – ha ha ha, I must be really hitting a nerve with you right? Hilarious! You may also want to think a bit more carefully before you post next time, I haven’t insulted well or SZ, I’ve merely interrogated their claims. SZ claimed to have inside knowledge of Brad and Angelina so I am perfectly within my rights to ask why that may be and make a judgment as to whether I believe them or not. “Well” has made some ludicrous claims about being harrassed by AJ which she has given no evidence for when she could easily do so and I know plenty of what she said can’t be true because of legal and journalistic issues. Plenty of other posters have called her out too and yet here you are obsessing over me again, you’re hysterical!

    @ SZ – also can I just ask why after posting on this blog for one week and not knowing Kate or I from Adam, you feel like you are in a position to speak on our behalf to Ian and say what we do or do not expect from him???? Kate and I have been posting on this blog every day for about 3 or 4 months now it must be and speak to Ian frequently, we are loyal to him because we think he is a decent guy and if at any point we no longer think that we would simply not post here. Why on earth would you make a comment to Ian to the effect that this post of his is not good enough for regulars like Kate and myself???? Or any other poster who has been commenting here for months either? What on earth would motivate you to do that? Kate and I speak for ourselves as does every other commenter here, and yet after reading and posting on this blog for one week you think you are in a postion to tell Ian what does and does not constitute a good story and what all other readers and commenters expect from him? I truly am dumbfounded.

    Reply
  162. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 7:54 am

    @ well – oh and I would be very careful about who you are accusing of “bullying” there my dear, I am not bullying anyone, merely discussing the validity of information another poster is presenting. Start on with the bullying tack again and you’re going to make yourself sound even more like all the other fakes you are trying so desperately to distinguish yourself from! People have told you a hundred times, either tell us in which state you have a restraining order against AJ or give Ian some evidence and then everyone will know you are legit. You have categorically refused to do that and have ignored or evaded any suggestion that you do so up until now though which I think is rather telling about how genuine you are don’t you think?

    Reply
  163. well said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:03 am

    @Mama San:That pic is pretty funny. I loved the story about them having to leave early that night becuase their kids were wreaking havoc back at the hotel and they had to go attend! I’m sure it was the fact that Brad had had enough and couldn’t stand to sit through one more awards show with her. Talk about double whammy from hell! Awards show and demon bitch from hell? Yikes!

    Reply
  164. TobyKat said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:05 am

    @Nicole:
    The interview has been rescheduled for tomorrow, Wednesday. Ann Curry will interview BP from Cannes

    Reply
  165. ffleur said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:07 am

    @TobyKat: I bet they will talk about the movie and Make it Right and that is it!

    Reply
  166. Mama San said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:08 am

    @well:
    This IMO is by far the funniest take on AJ to date.
    Abby Elliot from SNL, impression of AJ.
    http://www.tressugar.com/2761359

    Reply
  167. Mama San said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:12 am

    Even the most “Beautiful Woman in the World” {ahem…. insert eye roll}, Angelina Jolie, can take a bad photo.
    *Warning this photo may induce vomiting.*
    Someone’s “Nip/Tuck”, is a little tight, that or her ponytail. As always JMO.
    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/01/09/article-0-02FE5CAF000005DC-371_468×667.jpg

    Reply
  168. HadEnoughOfTheBull said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:13 am

    @Keane:
    No dear, you aren’t striking a nerve with me. I feel nothing but pity for you, actually.

    I’m simply reiterating to you what several on this board feel, and that is our wish for you to shut it up and tone it down. This board is for everyone, you do not own it, you don’t have any right to “investigate” everyone who comes here posting. If you don’t like what someone says here… swallow, digest and move on.

    My suggestion to you is, simply go back through the last thread alone and look at the number of posts to SZ in support of her after your little question tirade. Look at the number of posts in support of you. Simple math, really.

    You state that ‘well’ has made claims of stalking/harrassment that she hasn’t substantiated to us here. You mock her because of “journalistic and legal issues”. Tsk. You’re not the only journalist here, darling, and not the only one familiar with law. On that note, however… you claim your email account was hacked by AJ. Please, provide us with proof. Provide us with a copy of the police report you filed, and any and all investigative records. (You did say you were so proud of how the police there took internet crimes seriously.) I’m sure, after all, you wouldn’t dare ask anything of anyone else, that you yourself wouldn’t be willing and eager to provide to the rest of us… correct?

    Reply
  169. well said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:23 am

    @Mama San:The video isn’t working for me…but I think I saw the skit you’re talking about, since I tivo SNL. It was funny. The sad reality is though, that nothing about her is funny, it’s sad, pathetic and frightening. But I guess we all need to find humor, especially with things of such horror.

    Reply
  170. Peri said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:31 am

    @Mama San:
    Toooo funny. I found another one… this one made me pee a little. LOLOL

    Note the baby bottle reference.

    http://www.strimoo.com/video/15993217/Saturday-Night-Live-Update-Madonna-Angelina-Jolie-par-Saturday-Nigh-MySpaceVideos.html

    Reply
  171. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:32 am

    @Ray Catone:
    Thank you Ray! :-)

    Reply
  172. Mama San said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:33 am

    @well:
    True that a friend of mine has a saying about people who like to think of themselves as perfect or portray themselves as something they are not.
    “People who live in glass houses, get cut”.
    You might have to refresh the link once for it to come in.
    The only thing I find frightening about AJ, is that her usual beauty overshadowed and blindsided people to the ugliness that’s inside her.IMO she is not nice, sincere, or honest. IMO, she is vain, shallow, mean-spirited, insecure, jealous, and a fraud. I have no problem throwing her under the train, I wish more people{AJ’s peers} will continue to call her out, and mock her. She brought her BS to the public forum, that’s exactly how she should be brought down.
    “You live by the sword , you die by the sword”. As always JMO.

    Reply
  173. Mama San said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    @Peri:
    Ha Ha, I loved that one, SNL, IMO does great mock-ups of certain celeb’s, these two are “spot on”.

    Reply
  174. Patty anne said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    I came here and stayed here mainly because this blog is different from most all others in that the posters treat one another with dignity and respect…i.e. No Name Calling, No Back Alley Fighting…..now however it seems we have gained some wanna-be regulars who are Class A Street Fighters. If you have a problem with another blogger, ignore them, it’s your choice to respond to whomever you wish, but please, for this Blogs sake, do not turn this site into another FF, with the name calling, abuse shown there. Keane and Kare were the first ones here, they held it together and watched it grow, they defended it against the Brangaloonies so that WE can come here and enjoy a Mostly Loon Free gossip blog and chat up our take on the Bermuda Triangle which imo is soon to end. RC just posted a blockbuster today or tomorrow….please be patient with RC, and with others. Keep it respecful and we can all enjoy the place we’ve come to love….@HadEnoughOfTheBull:

    Reply
  175. Canuck said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    @Ray Catone:
    Aha! So it was you under that dark blue umbrella then! ;)

    Reply
  176. Liin said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    @Patty anne:

    Well said Patty anne – ignore the lot of them, we know who the regs are.

    @ Keane – you’ve had a major phirana attack on you again I see my lovely, Patty anne is right, we know you can put them all in their place, but why bother, your better than that.

    Reply
  177. justhelping said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:07 am

    With Mama on that one. I have watched Keane call out several posters, which I thought was strange at first. But then I realized what she was doing, like Mama said, keeping it loon free so those of us who want to be here can converse. Love ya Keane and Kate. Thank you for helping to make the blog what it is. @Patty anne:

    Reply
  178. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:07 am

    I think that picture is the Ian Undercover Team that Ian previously posted was at Cannes! Quite a get-up! So is that Ian and SugarRay or Ian and Ms. NineCents or Sugar Ray and Ms. NineCents or other mystery employees? Anyway, good one Ian – they sure dont look like Hollywood Gossip Spys and that is the point of being UnderCover isnt it! :-)

    Reply
  179. HadEnoughOfTheBull said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:21 am

    @Patty anne:
    Keane and Kate were here from the beginning? Really? Are you positive of this? I would think a look at the archives could easily answer that.

    I’m not a “would-be regular”. I’ve been reading here for months and months. Just because I chose not to post until now, does that make me less of a reader of these boards?

    I agree with you wholeheartedly on this point: “treat one another with dignity and respect”. Why should Keane not extend the same courtesy? This whole self-appointed policing of everyone who comes here and posts is tiresome. She makes demands of others that she does not hold even herself to.

    Reply
  180. mooki said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:24 am

    @Jodie:

    plant from Team Brangie I see…

    Reply
  181. justhelping said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:39 am

    Mooki, you have been posting here for awhile right? Do you think Keane and Kate have helped to establish this site into what it is? I do. I have looked back and there are not many comments. I do think I remember Keane stating that she followed the site, but did not start posting until a few months ago, which is when this site starting gaining momentum.

    Reply
  182. Liin said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:57 am

    I have been here a few months, I was wondering how peeps found this site, I had been surfing the main gossip sites for a couple of years (TMZ, X17, Parasite Hilton etc)just looked at the pictures really, I never ever heard this site mentioned anywhere. I have an interest in the downfall of Scientology and it wasnt until Ian started advertising his new film where he infiltrates them as a gay guy looking for help, that I came to his site, and then I saw that he also did some ‘gossip’ upon reading the posters comments I realised this seemed like proper journalism, with intelligent posters, Keane and Kate were very knowledgable and I havent left since. My point is, did the increase in traffic start around the time Ian was advertising?!?

    Reply
  183. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:24 am
    @Keane:
    @Kate:
    In my rather negative post to Ian I really shouldn’t have used either of your names. Won’t happen again

    @Keane: I would like to point out that the above post to you and Kate could have been answered w/ graciousness rather than being queried in that slightly abusive tone. Obviously, anyone could “see” that I realized my mention of you and Kate had been, in my mind, inappropriate.

    I, as w/ anyone else, can question Ian and express displeasure. In his own words he has indicated he appreciates both positive and negative comments.

    No need to be “dumbfounded” by my remarks/actions. Ignore me in future if you wish. However, in the words of Rodney King (of all people!), “Can’t we just all get along?”

    Reply
  184. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:05 am

    @HadEnoughOfTheBull: If you’re here, note that I responded to your post on the Cannes story thread.

    Reply
  185. justhelping said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    There is a new post. Not sure if you saw that. @SZ:

    Reply
  186. joanne said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:09 am

    @justhelping:
    I came to this site because of keane, I missed her posts on dlisted, she stopped because someone was giving her a hard time (I think) but it looks like they followed her. Someone doesn’t like what she is saying which gives what she says more credit.

    Reply
  187. justhelping said on May 19th, 2009 at 11:17 am

    I totally agree with you. There is a definite pattern. I never got on blogs before, I just happened to find this and I found it interesting.@joanne:

    Reply
  188. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    TobyKat said on May 18th, 2009 at 10:46 pm
    The Today show will be interviewing Brad Pitt tomorrrow from Cannes. Maybe he’ll have something remotely interesting to say……
    It was unclear at press time if the couple’s six children – including baby twins Vivienne and Knox — would be making the trip to join papa Pitt, however, he may reveal more details about the plans of Hollywood’s most watched family when he sits down for an interview with NBC’s “Today” show on Tuesday.

    @TobyKat. What happened? No interview on “Today” today. I must say I’ve never seen/read so many conflicting reports about anything other than on politicians, etc. than I have noticed re: this entire Cannes and general J-P stuff. It’s even more amazing as many reports are coming from supposed mainstream sources.

    Reply
  189. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    @ Patty Anne, Llin and Joanne – thanks so much ladies for your words of support, I don’t think there’s any point in me responding to the obvious plants on this thread and the one before. I firmly believed “well” was a plant and the moment I called her out I was set upon by a couple of new posters who directed their venom towards me when everything I had said had been in a calm and reasonable way. The moment I did the same thing with “SZ”, another flurry of completely new posters who have allegdly been reading all along without previous comment immediately jumped in to attack. Again, its the perfect confirmation to me that what I strongly suspected was correct. I have no need to respond to them because they only serve to prove exactly what they are trying to attack, which gives me a good laugh!

    @ SZ – still you refused to answer the question I put to you re: why you brought Kate’s name into this knowing she was the other main regular other than me when during the week in which you claim to have been reading the blog she has barely commented as she has been away on a business trip. Instead you try to turn it around on me by saying I am being “ungracious” in my acceptance of your apology. Well, to be perfectly honest I’m not interested in hearing a plant’s apology, I want to know why you feel you can speak on behalf of Kate and myself and any other poster and tell Ian what we do and don’t expect from him. We know Ian much better than you do because you have only been here a week, I can’t think what you meant by jumping in with that comment. Now you are getting testy as “well” did because I called you out. Big surprise.

    Reply
  190. Patty anne said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    Do you remember when we all watched IAN on May 13th, on IUC tv? Ian stated to all those present that he is grateful for Keane in her efforts to establish this bog, and for her help in making it a success. He gave her high praise…personally. It’s obvious to me that IAN feels Keane is an integral part of this blog….that should answer any wanna-be trying to assume control over the blog. Oh and handenoughofthebull, if you have more questions about Keane’s right to be here and to post….why don’t you just contact IAN and ask him? @justhelping:

    Reply
  191. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Keane: You do your work very well. I’m rising to your bait. I’m getting “testy” and you’re calling me a “plant.” If you cared to read earlier posts on the Cannes site you would know why I mentioned Kate. If you had read other posts you would realize I made reasonable comments about you. Sure, you want to fight? Want me down in the mud w/ you? Want to bring out my not-so-altruistic/balanced side? Do you do this to keep the site popping? What a fool I was to suggest to Nicole that I wished both of you could get along.

    (By the way, am I helping to debunk myself now? For all to see that I’m not as nice or whatever as I’ve seemed? Hey, I’ve said I have a strong, opionated streak. I called myself a “Bitch” on the air. I also know that putting this out right now just keeps the negatives flowing.)

    Not a bloody thing I will ever write to you about myself will be believed by you. This is either an excellent talent to keep buzz for a site going (and feisty back-and-forths don’t turn everyone off), or the negative remarks made about your paranoia, etc. must be true. Or both. I have no problem getting pissy at you right now and I’m fully aware that this is what you want me to do. Good job. I’m still not leaving this site and I believe that you’re a fraud if you don’t bother to check me out in a proper way. And, by the way, don’t bother saying “Oh….I’ve hit a nerve, now, haven’t I?”

    Et Tu, Brutus!

    Reply
  192. liuno said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @HadEnoughOfTheBull:
    Respectfully put.

    Reply
  193. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    @ Patty Anne – thanks again hun, I was going to suggest they e-mail Ian with their complaints in future and let him handle it. It is his blog and if he doesn’t want me to post here or doesn’t like the way in which I am posting he can tell me. It isn’t anyone else’s place to tell me what I can and can’t say (provided I am not being abusive), as I don’t tell others what they should or shouldn’t think, should or shouldn’t say. At the end of the day I have every right to call out people who are claiming to have an inside knowledge on Brange if I don’t believe they are legit. What I believe does not have to be accepted by anyone else, but I have a right to say it. I have dealt with “well” and “SZ” in what I consider to be a calm and reasonable way but unfortunately what they have said does not add up to me and I do not believe they are who they say they are. I think they are both here ultimately to gain influence on the blog and try to convince people of something other than what Ian or SR has suggested. Initial attempts to do so were very obvious so now they are going for a much more diffident approach to try to gain the sympathy of other posters. I am just calling it as I see it and that I am afraid is what I see. Both of them could confirm they are who they say they are and in the case of “well” that what she says is true by sending proof to Ian, I don’t need to see it. “Well” at least has totally refused to do that and just carried on pretending to have the inside scoop on Brange and talking to other posters. I do not trust her one bit. So that’s my view and I am more than entitled to it.

    BTW re: what some idiot or other was saying about how I claimed to have been here from the beginning of the blog but if you check the archives you will find that I haven’t, that isn’t what I meant and I think they knew that perfectly well. However let me just clarify that I have been posting on the blog for 3 or 4 months now maybe (Kate will confirm) which is when a few people started to post. Before that there were never any or many other comments so I read the posts without posting. I have however been reading IUC since last year when the lovely Mrs K on Dlisted discovered it.

    And re: my crime report about the internet hacking and identity theft, yes I do have a crime number for that which if I gave you you could call up my local police station and confirm with them. Unfortunately as my identity has been stolen there will be no way I will be giving any more information out about myself as I’ve had enough intrusion into my privacy already. So anyone who demands that I post that info on here all I can say is tough shit.

    Reply
  194. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @ SZ – no SZ all my remarks have been completely calm and measured, I have not once tried to bait you, inicte you or start any sort of fight with you. You are the person who addressed your comments to me from word go when they had nothing whatsoever to do with me, you are the person who brought my name into a post at the top of the thread which yet again had nothing whatsoever to do with me. You began the dialogue with me but you are only happy if I take everything you say at face value when it does not ring true to me at all. You claim to have worked in my industry, you are talking about my industry, and yet you don’t talk like someone who does and I’m very sorry but I don’t believe you. That is my prerogative, why would it make you so upset? I am just one commenter here, I don’t believe what you say, but others do so why should it be so troubling to you? And yes, you are showing your true colours now rather aren’t you, what a surprise when you’d managed to play nice for a matter of a whole week? And BTW re: trying to make Nicole and I “make friends”, again, you were getting involved in something that has nothing to do with you and really shouldn’t mean a shit to you. Nicole and I don’t like each other, big deal, its not your problem. Plenty of people don’t like other people on blogs, we don’t require a person who has been posting here for a week to jump in and get involved. We are both big enough and ugly enough to deal with it ourselves. If you didn’t want my opinions perhaps you shouldn’t have engaged me with your questions – which I took time to respond to when I really didn’t have to – in the first place. You reap what you sow, sorry.

    Reply
  195. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    @Peri:
    MY GOODNESS that was funny!!!!!!!!!!! I think that I, too, peed a little bit!!!! BAA HAAA.

    Reply
  196. liuno said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    @Patty anne:
    The name calling & back alley fighting has been going on for some time. Reading for the last few months before replying it’s clear this did not JUST start, it’s been on going. Respect is a two way street.

    Reply
  197. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    @ALL — Okay … so now we are (1) arguing with other posters; (2) debating authenticity of other posters. If there ARE plants ;-) they have served their purpose. What I wanna know is this: Is that Old Guy in the picture IAN?????

    Reply
  198. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    @Keane. I have been here moe than a week. I am contacting Ian w/ my name. If you care, talk to him.

    Reply
  199. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @SZ:
    Thank you SZ. Peace. For what it’s worth, I believe you have given quite a bit of personal info that could be traced relatively easily if one really wanted to look you up. ;-)

    Reply
  200. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane: LOL you are such a feisty little thing Amiga! Grrrr rufff, ruff woof woof Grrrrrr (dog isn’t my native language so forgive me if something was lost in the translation).

    Reply
  201. backalleyknees said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    Canuck are you out there?

    Reply
  202. liuno said on May 19th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    @Togi:
    What about the person under the dark blue umbrella? LOL

    Reply
  203. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @liuno:
    DARN IT … you busted me! LOL JK obviously!

    He HAS to be somewhere in that picture. Under Umbrella #1 seems as good as any other place.

    Reply
  204. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @ Togi – well I’m just trying to stop the imposters from preventing the truth about Ms Jolie get out. That’s been their aim from day one and that’s what I am determined to ensure does not happen. You please all the people all of the time! How are you my lovely, what have you been up to? You have not been posting enough lately! xx

    Reply
  205. cynicalone said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @Togi:
    Togi! I’m shocked to see you on here during the day (my time)! I keep meaning to ask you where in Alaska you live. Nothing too specific and if you don’t want to answer, I understand. It’s just that my in-laws live in Alaska and the pictures I’ve seen are amazing. We’re supposed to go visit but my husband is the worst about actually taking vacation time. Of course, he’s been there so it’s not such a big deal to him!

    Anyway, from what I’ve seen in pics and from what my mother-in-law tells me about their lifestyle there, I’d say you’re one lucky lady!

    Reply
  206. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @Keane:
    Believe it or not, I’ve actually had to WORK while being at work! LOL I have been able to keep “read up” on everything but haven’t had time to comment. Add on top of that yet another cause I have volunteered my time to (the local animal shelter) … and an extremely CRANKY hubby, and … well … one gets a bit BUSY!

    Reply
  207. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @cynicalone:
    Hello there! I do actually lurk during the day, while at work ;-) When I can, I comment. I do a lot of family law work, which is why I commented on the other blog about AJ and her suicide threat, that I don’t think I really believe she made the threat. If the kids DID overhear something like that, she would lose custody of ALL the kids. That is, if BP ever used it to his advantage in a custody dispute (which, if true, he could and should do to protect his children).

    I live about 50 miles north of Anchorage, where it is at least a ZILLION times more beautiful than THAT Hell-Hole! I literally have nightmares about having to move back to California. Where do your in-laws live? Please don’t tell me Anchorage! LOL

    Reply
  208. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @ Togi – yeah I’m pretty busy too but I keep having to jump back on to defend myself against attack. Oh well, I guess I must be doing something right somewhere….!

    Reply
  209. cynicalone said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @Togi:
    They live in Soldotna (did I spell it correctly). They are retired so they’re lucky enough to spend the warmer months (March-October) in Alaska and the colder months elsewhere. My hubby wants to move up there but we’d be there year-round and I don’t think I could handle the winters. We barely have a winter where I live and it’s more than enough for me!

    Reply
  210. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Is the blockbuster JEN???? She’ll be in Cannes either today or tomorrow??? Baaa haaaa haaaa! Now THAT would be a hoot, wouldn’t it? Sorry I’m just now responding to this … I was just thinking to myself “Hmmmm … now what would constitute “blockbuster” that would happen either today or tomorrow. Today’s the 19th … tomorrow is the 20th. Cannes anyone? What’s gonna happen at Cannes? Is that why the people are already lining up along the roadside in the above pic? Oh goodie, goodies. I’m just hopping up and down, clapping my hands in excitement and anticipation. Whoo hoo! I’m not even a JA loonie an I can imagine myself changing: Jen … Jen … Jen

    Reply
  211. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    @cynicalone:
    Soldatna? Oooooooh. It’s beautiful down there, too. Tons of fishing on the Kenai, lots of clamming down on the gulches. Very, very nice! I probably shouldn’t put this out there because we like to keep this sort of thing SECRET, but the winters really aren’t that bad! Sure, we get some pretty freaking cold spells (-20 and colder), but that happens only a couple times a year. It’s so dry that it really doesn’t feel as cold as it might in the Lower 48. And it is BEAUTIFUL in the winter. The first winter is tough but after you get acclimated, it’s a piece of cake. We start wearing shorts and T-shirts when it hits the 50 degree range. During the winter, we get 40 degree whether and people just go nuts. It’s quite hilarious.

    Obviously, I LOVE this place. I would highly recommend it to anyone who even CONSIDERED it.

    Reply
  212. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @Keane:
    I am fairly certain you do a lot of things right in a lot of different places, Keane! XXXXXX

    Reply
  213. cynicalone said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @Togi:
    Hmmm…the winters aren’t so bad? I’ll have to take that into consideration when we go to visit. However, I’m not sharing your secret with my husband because it would be the nail in the coffin, so to speak! The “unbearable” winters are my only bargaining chip!

    Actually, I’d be open to the idea but it would be a big change for us and our kids. Probably a good change, but a bit scary. Either way, I’m hoping we can go visit next summer. I can’t wait!

    Reply
  214. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @cynicalone:
    This is an awesome place for kids to grow up. They can do things here they couldn’t do most other places. Of course I am talking about life outside of Anchorage. Anchorage is just another city. We came from California so were THRILLED with the school system. Of course Alaskans complain about the school system all the time, but I always tell those folks they aught to move to California. LOL The people can be a little rough looking at first, but you get used to that in a big hurry. The guy beside you down at the river, the one with the long hair and big beard, isn’t the unibomber! My mother-in-law always gets freaked out and “doesn’t trust” the men who just try to talk to her. Just a different world up here. haaa haa. Like a breath of fresh air. June/July is a great time to come … before the summer rains.

    Reply
  215. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Togi:
    Hi Togi – if I could travel freely and have money at my disposal, Alaska is where I would go – have always wanted to go there. Maybe some day – like my fantasy of England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and the Netherlands! Everyone else can go to Hawaii and Paris – not my cup of tea. North is where I go! :-)

    Reply
  216. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    @Togi:
    So totally with you on that one. I’ve thought if BP really wants to maximize publicity he should show up on the red carpet with Jen! IF he could talk her into it…

    Reply
  217. too curious said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Hmmm…we even share a lot of travel dreams! I have been to England and Wales (absolutely loved Wales) but didn’t have a chance to visit Scotland or Ireland. Would like to see the Netherland, too.

    Of course, I also absolutely love Disney World so I’ve got my inner 5 year old covered, too! My DH and I have been to Disney World 6 times and never once with a kid (the cat stays home, he doesn’t enjoy traveling).

    Reply
  218. Keane said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @ Togi – aw thanks Togester x

    Reply
  219. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    @ladybert62:
    And DON’T take the tour buses. I’ve never done a cruise, though a lot of locals have and say they are worth it. But I certainly wouldn’t limit myself to seeing Alaska that way. You’d miss out on soooo much. Like, how would you see that moose, quite literally, walk the streets of Anchorage. Going into work one winter morning, a police car was ESCORTING a female moose who was slowly miandering down the middle of the road and wouldn’t pick up the pace even when the officer was on the bull-horn! It was so funny. Everyone was just cracking up. All I could think was “God, I love this place!” And that’s Anchorage. Out here where I live, there was a “high speed chase” as police chased after a moose who was getting into a little bit of trouble. It’s all good! And the towns are so cool. Very small by outside standards, but you get used to things being small and when you go Outside, the world can be a bit overwhelming! Haaaa haaa. I can’t stand visiting family in Oregon/Washington/California. Too hectic and crazy. More than one car in the driveup expresso shack is way too long a wait for me.

    Reply
  220. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @Keane:
    “Togster!” Haaaa haaaa! Togi is actually my Japanese Bobtail cat’s name … and that’s what I call her! (How did you know? Are you stalking me???? Bwwaaaa haaaa!

    Reply
  221. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @Keane:
    I know … you HACKED MY email and got my facebook/myspace page!!!!!

    Reply
  222. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    Per a just posted pic on FF, BP and AJ have arrived together in a car garage somewhere in Cannes. For what it’s worth, at least this part of the saga is answered.

    Your friendly “Plant.”

    Reply
  223. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @Togi:
    Hey – no knocking Oregon! We are now the proud owners of 14 acres in Oregon (Coos Bay – Reedsport area). Hopefully we are going to build a teeny house there and live out our years there since we cant afford the horrible Bay Area any more (can you believe that the dump of a house that I rent would easily sell for $800K plus on the market) – so our plan is in 5 years to be living in the backwoods of Oregon! Cant wait to get out of California!! :-)

    Reply
  224. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @SZ:
    Oh noooooooooooooo! Say it’s not so! UGH. Okay … what little respect I was trying to feel for BP just went out the window. Thanks for the update oh Mighty Plantar. ;-)

    Reply
  225. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Well, darling, Coos Bay (as are many other parts of Oregon and Washington) is quite a different story! My family is in the Portland and surrounding areas … and though Portland is kinda cool, it is sooooooo crowded! Oddly enough, just travel a bit over the river into Washington and … voila … very pretty again! Congrats on your acreage! Sounds great. My family still owns homes and property in California wine country. We’ve owned it since the 1960s so, as you can imagine, the value increase is phenominal!!! Proceeds from that alone will pay for our retirement and our daughter’s college. And trust me … those homes are NOT mansions, though my mom lives on a beautiful creek bordered piece of property that is worth way too much. If water wasn’t such an issue, I wouldn’t mind the Northern California – Redding area. Poor California has been RAPED! It was such an incredible place when I was a kid.

    Reply
  226. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    @Togi:
    Someday I will also get to Seattle and Vancouver British Columbia – ah, again, the travel dreams! My lucky sister lives in the Seattle area but I have not visited her (obviously) – I think if I started up that way I would just keep on a trucking and never look back! North, north, north! :-) (Coos Bay-Reedsport area gets 90 inches of rain a year – which is exactly what I want and the entire Douglas County has less people than San Francisco! YIPPEE again :D )

    Reply
  227. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @ladybert62:
    The entire STATE of Alaska has fewer people than San Francisco! LOL

    Reply
  228. Togi said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @ladybert62:
    BUT (I must add), I LOVE San Francisco. It is my favorite city (and I am biased, I admit it).

    Reply
  229. liuno said on May 19th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    @SZ:
    On a previous article he used freedom of speach.

    Reply
  230. ladybert62 said on May 19th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    @Togi:
    I know SF is nice – but I have lived here since 1967 and it has changed dramatically – hubby and I are both from Wisconsin and want out of SF – so picked Oregon (always my favorite place to go to when I could afford the time, money etc). Anyway, some day we will get to Alaska. (My favorite long distance boyfriend was from Anchorage!). :-)

    Reply
  231. HadEnoughOfTheBull said on May 19th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    @Keane:
    You truly are ill, darling. “Plants”? Trying to take over the board? Seriously, you’re either delusional or have problems with grandeur and ego. Which is it? At first I laughed when I read this, but then I stopped and shook my head at how really sad it is. I am a regular reader here, I do not post on other boards, I do not know anyone else anywhere. I most certainly don’t know AJ.

    And I repeat my post to you about providing proof, since you demand such from others. Funny that you won’t do so, isn’t it? Invaded privacy… how simple it would be to blacken out your details and yet still provide a copy of the report. So you know, I don’t care if you ever show it or not. I never believed you from the beginning, but that’s not a big deal to me. I was simply making a point to you and others about your treatment of some, which you so graciously emphasized once again.

    And for the record, I don’t recall anyone saying that you couldn’t post here, but rather asking you to stop policing everyone and attacking everyone that you don’t like. Odd how you claim you should be able to say what you wish, but you won’t let others do the same without risking your unflattering attention. So many times we’ve had people here say they want to post but won’t risk being attacked. WHO do you think they’re referring to?

    And btw, I was there the night of Ian’s broadcast, I saw his comment (shout-out) to Keane. Kudos to her. Her clue solving abilities ARE good, noone ever said the opposite. She’s most definitely an assett in that regard to this site. What detracts from her are her “social” skills.

    I would hope she would spend some time thinking on what has been said to her, and refine her comments and treatment of others, but I think we can all see she is set on making it look like the AJ fans are out to get her, or AJ has put “plants” here. It’s too hard to accept “friendly fire” isn’t it?

    Reply
  232. cuze said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    @HadEnoughOfTheBull:
    If Keane comes across as though certain posters are “out to get her” as you claim, it might be because certain posters, such as yourself, appear to be a bit obsessed with her. Seriously, how long have you been riding Keanes ass now? Take your own advice and STFU will ya? You said your piece now move on. Get over it.

    Reply
  233. SZ said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @HadEnoughOfTheBull: Amen. In truth, after this last round w/ Keane today, I have felt both angry and sad. I’ve been having fun on this site…even foolishly thought I was having a sincere chat w/ Keane for a moment or two. There are many good people here, and when they show up I’ll probably say hello. If things get really sticky re: the inevitable official break-up of BP and AJ, and after the Cannes event, I’m sure to have a few things to say. But, it’s disheartening to have to deal w/ attacks and absurd innuendos.

    I remain, The Friendly “Plant.” Maybe I’ll create that as a screen name. Minor chuckle.

    Reply
  234. MickeyB said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    I have to add my two cents. I am fairly new to posting on this site although I have been reading for a while. I like reading Keanes comments as she seems rational and even a little amusing. If people dont like her posts or anyone elses then just dont comment. No need to attack anyone least of all Keane, Kate or any other regulars. This is spose to be fun People! we all have our opinions but mostly this site is for the anti AJ ers. So in agreeance with Cuze STFU!! now lets get back to business of bagging AJ…..

    Reply
  235. cuze said on May 19th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    @MickeyB:
    Here, here!!!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

May 2009
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta