IUC Exclusive: Brad’s Parents Tell Him To Ditch Angie

Posted on May 14th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Brad Pitt’s parents told their beloved son to drop Angelina Jolie if he wants to have a normal life, according to a source close to Pitt.  “They sat him down and basically told him she’s trouble and no good,” the source said.  “They urged him not to bring her to Cannes.  Brad’s mother Jane is sick about what’s going on and has not been able to sleep well.”  The source added that Jane Pitt is still close friends with the woman Brad cheated on Jennifer Aniston.  “Jane would like nothing more than for Brad and Jen to reunite,” the source said.  Developing…

  1. cuze said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:42 am

    At this point I’d think Jane would be happy if Brad would hook up with almost any other woman besides Jolie.

    Reply
  2. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:55 am

    True cruze. Brad, aka, horny-dog, had to hook up with the one woman on this planet that would drive any man to alcholism and a mental breakdown, and it appears now that it is the children, and his parents who are suffering unnecessarily over their staying together “publicly”. Brad is now getting what he and Angie dished out to Jennifer for four years. If any of them is a saint, it’s Jen, for bearing that crap in such a classy way for so long. Seems all of HW is afraid to take a stand for the truth against a woman who would stop at NOTHING to have her way, real or fake, truth or lie, it’s got to be her way….or else! Remember, Angie is familiar with “putting out a death contract”, association with known killers, etc. Shiverrrr to be near that witch

    Reply
  3. ladybert62 said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    GO JANE! Yea, Yea! :-)

    Reply
  4. magnolia said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:01 am

    He needs to listen to his mother. She seems to have more sense than he does.

    Reply
  5. ladybert62 said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    @Patty anne:
    That is what I dont understand – WHY are they so afraid of the evil Ms. Jolie? :-)

    Reply
  6. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:27 am

    Mornin’ all. I tried to watch IUCTV from last night, sorry Ian the sound was really bad. I watched the segment with Paula, for a bit, had to turn it off, maybe it is my LT, I had a hard time hearing her, not you.
    Anyway, so BP and AJ according to Paula , one question was answered and really she just reiterated what most people have been voicing , who see through AJ’s narcissistic-attention seeking-famewhore-diva-man stealing-phoney- behavior, that yes she will most likely go to Cannes, because why{ she wants the attention}, Paula agrees with the majority of most woman, that AJ is a slut that HAD to go after BP, , a real loser, exactly my opinion, she could have had anyone, forget her past behavior, she went after BP while he was married, period, she is an opportunist, and she denied and lied about it, and then finally admitted to what everyone already knew. Don’t get me wrong ,no one is innocent ,BP , typical man being led by his dick mentality, big whoop. What IMO really stuck in the caw was her lies, thinly veiled contempt for the ex-wife, the smug { my shit doesn’t stink} face , the endless interviews gushing about how happy her and BP are, their so in love…blah, blah , blah…..puke. The contempt she has for normalacy, stablity, sisterhood between woman. I would not befreind this bitch if she and someone else paid me. It was mean-spirited, ugly, nasty , and immature. The nannie-nannie-boo-boo act, is enough to rip her hair out. How sophomore.
    She mocks motherhood and marriage, the bit from the breastfeeding photo on the cover of “W” magazine, I mean seriously I wanted to write the editors, and let them know that, that was BS and real moms don’t want to see this tramp be the face or spokesperson for breastfeeding. How dare they{AJ,BP, and W} exploit, and mock the beauty of breastfeeding, they’re{BP and AJ} trick IMO set back breast-feeding 10 years. Did anyone read any of the blog boards on Us magazine , when they posted that story, it turned out to be a witch-hunt for women who breast-feed. She didn’t help, I want to slap her for what she did. As well as her screwing around with iilegal adoptions. I am adopted, and IMO she set back adoption for many ,many , many people , for many years to come. She is a selfish, jealous, insecure headcase. They are people that had every right, and followed every law to legally adopt children, internationally, what she did IMO was nothing short of buying a “black market baby”, human trafficking, and child exploitation. She mocked Pax and shit on his homeland when she IMO kidnapped him , stole his identity and name.
    Anyway IMO so BP’s parents want her gone, it just doesn’t work that way, she will never be gone.
    Their son made his bed with a she-devil , laid with her, and bred with her, there is no going away.
    So what’s next, they go to Cannes, show up with the fake smiles and fake PDA, gush about their big happy lovefest. AJ trying to look like her mom, BP trying to look like RR, fake laugh over each other about the kids throwing knives, { ahem, I mean spaghetti}. AJ over acting with her horsey face smile, or will it be the serene { I just peed cream soda } face. I agree with Paula ,AJ is boring , how much more is there , I do not think there is anymore shocking , to be discussed about this bitch , she pretty much has covered all that “bat-shit” crazy has to offer. Nothing at this point about AJ will surprise me.
    As always JMO.

    Of course BP’s parents want him to get out and away from her, can you even imagine the pain, embaressment and heartbreak, that BP inflicted on them by his own actions. They’re human, of course IMO, they’re ashamed of their son, any normal parent would be, that’s not saying they don’t love their son, or that parents cannot or don’t have a right to be upset, dissappointed, angry at their children, parents are the sounding boards and reality checks for their kids, even adult children . So yes, IMO they absolutely want him and the kids to get away from her, and surely they do not want this woman prolonging the farce any longer than necessary, than need be.

    Reply
  7. sama said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:28 am

    What i find funny about this story is that pitt’s mother constantly says that she would love it when jen and brad got back together…. but is it me or is that only a thing that brad and jen themselves can do, i mean if there is no love (in love i mean by that) then they can’t be together only because his mother wants him to…. brad and jen should only be together again if they love each other and not because his mother wants him to…… if brad got back together with jen because his mother wants him to then it would go wrong anyway….. or is it because his mother knows that brad loves jen and is she saying it because she knows this, that would make sense…

    Reply
  8. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Well, i keep thinking back to what Paula said last night on IUCTV, “I won’t get sued” when asked about Angie’s relationship with her brother James. Money = power in the States, and i personaly think that everyone is afraid to speak the truth for fear of Jolie’s lawyers. Unless they have hard documentation in hand, no one will speak one glimmer of truth about their sorry asses, and will with absence of action of any kind, be a willing participant in whatever it is that Jolie decides to do…anything! My ex was disgnosed Schizophrenic, and one of his psychiatrists told me that a schizo thinks they are all powerful, no rules for them; if he wants to do it, then it’s alright to do. Something is most definately amiss in Jolie’s brain functioning. All through society and literature, there are “heros” who step up to the plate, and take a narcissistic dictator down , for the people at large…thank God for people such as Ian who has the cookamungas to do so, aparently no one else has them!@ladybert62:

    Reply
  9. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    Posted May 14th 2009 2:00AM by TMZ Staff

    There’s a new celebrity war raging in Hollywood — except this one doesn’t involve famous people, just the magazines who report on them.

    Us Weekly has launched a full-scale attack on their sworn enemy InTouch Weekly — using a two page spread in their new issue to rip their glossy rivals for printing “bogus” and “phony” stories about Brangelina for the last 4 years.

    Us printed 21 InTouch covers dating back to 2005 — and then shredded the “fake” stories one by one, killing the mag for running headlines that screamed “Brad Gives Up,” “Brad Moves Out” and “The Fight That Split Brad and Angelina.”

    InTouch fired back with a nice snarky statement of their own: “We’re extremely flattered that our competition pays so much attention to InTouch that they were willing to devote a 2-page spread to us.”

    Game on.
    This shows what Noah and Paula were concerned about. Looks like the Brangie Brand is in full force attack mode….yes, Game Is On!!

    Reply
  10. chris said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:49 am

    i think aniston deserves better than pitt. especially after what she’s been through in the press the past 4 years, and that’s just the top of the iceberg in my opinion

    Reply
  11. topbrit said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:03 am

    @ hya boys and girls – just off topic re pics of jolie ‘breast feeding’,if she was really breast feeding the twins her breasts would be fuller, mum’s will know what i mean.they would be full of milk larger i think even if she wasn’t really feeding at that time justing posing for the camera -they would be huge as were mine – this goes along with my belief she was never preggers she used a surrogate jmo.check them out once more see what ya think.

    Reply
  12. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    Well, I now believe I have stumbled into ground-zero for this battle of child custody as well as the control of U.S. publications.
    Ian said that AJ was watching this page. I wasn’t sure if I believed that.
    Today I believe it.
    The “drug den” video that was all over google and had been for awhile is now suddenly coming down on several sites.
    She’s reading this.
    Both camps are contributing to this information because, apparently, this site is the only one in the country that has the balls to print the stuff they are getting from the families.
    This is going to be a nasty custody battle. His camp hinted there were drug fest/ sex orgy tapes. I wonder if that was a threat or if it’s true. If he doesn’t have it, he should wish he does.
    Her previous behavior was out there for everyone to see. Brad STILL chose her to be the mother of his children.
    She was STILL allowed to adopt children.
    So his lawyers are going to have to make a case from her behavior during the marriage–and, even if there is film like that, the judge will grant supervised visitation at the least.
    Mama San is right—-he isn’t going to be able to just walk away from AJ with those children and never look back.
    When they added all these kids to this toxic mix, they really created a mess that will never really go away. They are the parents of these children.
    I do believe that AJ has very little on Brad aside from the drinking. That old story from college was desperate.
    This is a mess. Maybe the kids will finally get a little stability and schooling now that they will certainly be taken out of some of this craziness.

    Reply
  13. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:16 am

    Patty anne
    Good catch on the gossip tabs taking sides with each camp.
    The war is on.

    Reply
  14. ladybert62 said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    @Patty anne:
    Thanks Patty Anne – I agree – thank you Ian for bringing the truth into the open! :-)

    Reply
  15. Susanna said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    I couldn’t watch IUCTV last night bc all I had was my blackberry….Ian, is there a phone number where we can call in and listen? I did listen to Paula’s segment this morning. The book sounds interesting – I will def. buy it! I was hoping she’d dish more on Brangie though…but it was funny to hear that Paula thinks the same way about Angie that we do …opportunistic narcissist.

    About Cannes – when is Brad’s movie premiering? Something inside me thought it was this Friday, tomorrow. Cannot wait to see the spectacle. Will he bring Angie (I know Paula said last night that she thought so)? If so, how in the heck will they act (prob. like at the Oscars, smug and distant with fake laughing)?

    Paula didn’t seem to think there was any Sudanese model that was pregnant with Brad’s baby.

    Did anyone watch the second half of the segment with Noah? If so, can you give us a breakdown? I’m at work and I really can’t blare it here!

    Reply
  16. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:43 am

    The Grand Canyon in the U.S. was built one raindrop at a time…Brange can be brought to light and truth the same way. Ian is that first drop of rain erroding the facade of Hollywood Royal Family , and thus exposing them for the Gestapolike perverted human beings they BOTH are. The lies, perversion, intimidating methods, irresponsible child care, mental illness , narcissistic behavior, attempts to destroy an innocent woman , everything needs to come out. I’m a fan of Turner Clasic Network on television, and am familiar with HW of the early days, with such Reporters as Heddy Hoper, Rona Barrett, etc. Now those “dames” gave no quarter. They printed the truth about the studios number one stars…called a spade a spade, in fact, the studios/stars lived in fear of what they did in the dark coming to light due to these REAL reporters…shame we don’t have them around today. @ladybert62:

    Reply
  17. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    @topbrit:
    I agree with you on that one, not so much the breast photo was staged, the audicity she had or has claiming that she does, how soon after that mag’ cover did she state in another interview that she stopped breatfeeding at I believe it was three months or sooner, I’ll find the article, because, gosh darn it, it’s really hard to breast-feed twins, according to “wondermom”. My eye I say, IMO she never did to begin with.
    @pickwick:
    Right on, she is not going away, fur’ sur’ this shiznit custody battle will be IMO a “Battle Royale”, he better have some good dirt on her, cos’ JMO, been there done that with custody. First it’s civil law, not criminal , civil law you can sling mud left and right w/o any real substance. If I was the judge , and they both came out with some crap, I’d order them both into therapy, have them both pyshologically evaluated, and an at home-study{ they would have a very hardtime with that one}, appoint a GAL or CASA worker for the kids, and have all the children evaluated as well, that would just be day one, make a temp/order of joint-custody , order a immediate drug test on both parties{hair, blood, urine}, DNA test on all bio’s to establish paternity{ this is commonplace , to establish child-support} and freeze all assets and out-of country travel w/ the kids unless each party ask specific permission with the court to do so, and make them appear in court every 30 days with a status report until all reports come in.
    As always JMO.

    Reply
  18. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:26 am

    Noah said he believes Angie will make an appearance in Caane for the publicity. He also said Angie and Brad are only together “for the public” however, in private they are not a couple. In fact he stated they have had an “Open” relationship for the past two years. When asked why the twins haven’t been seen, he said, “The twins are a valuable commodity for Brangelina” which i take to mean they are using photo ops of the twins as a sort of hidden savings account. will pull up photo ops when they want to add cash to their bank accounts. He also said when asked about Brad and Jen getting back together, he said she will continue dating “a lot of other men” and they will not get together, but remain good friends. I think that is code for they are secretely getting back together, but need to hide it for obvious reasons. JMO.@Susanna:

    Reply
  19. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @Mama San:
    I remember that comment from her as well. She said she had tried everything and that she couldn’t get the football hold down. Something about breast feeding twins was too exhausting for her. I think it was last fall when she was doing her media blitz for The Changeling.

    Reply
  20. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    @Patty anne:
    didn’t they keep Shiloh hidden for a long time as well. I don’t really remember seeing her until Brad hauled her out for TCCOBB. These two make me sick. And I hope Jen doesn’t take him back like nothing ever happened. He was such a d*ck to her. And that goes beyond the cheating with AJ. He let AJ drag JA through the mud over and over. He continually slapped JA in the face with his antics. She deserves better. And with all the baggage he has now, JA is flying high. What a mess these people have made. If it were just the adults it would be so much more entertaining, but with six little souls who need stability and love, it makes this situation all the more effed up.

    Reply
  21. Susanna said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    @Patty anne: Thank you for the recap!

    Reply
  22. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:41 am

    Mama San
    You said it.
    Lawyers and judges and social workers digging around in this mess—it’s going to get very ugly.
    The only hope is that one of the two (probably AJ) will just quietly give up the kids.
    There will be drug tests ordered—probably her history alone, without any new allegations—would warrant that. His lawyer probably told him to get to “alcohol rehab”. I noticed it wasn’t in a certified center—it was with some guy somewhere. Maybe they are trying to get away with that. The judge may order a real alcohol treatment center. Maybe.
    If they find drugs in Aj’s urine, blood or hair—and not in Brad’s—that may be enough to get the kids with her getting visitation.
    I think both are about to grow up and realize that there are choices we make that can’t be undone very easily.
    Collecting children is not the same thing as collecting knives.
    I’m not trying to be mean, but things are different when there are kids. AJ had a difficult childhood with parents that treated her as though she wasn’t a priority. These kids appear to be in similar circumstances.
    I think that is the last thing she would want.
    AJ appears to have been raised in a weird, all-or-nothing world. Plenty of money and plenty of sex and not a lot of real love.
    I wish she could have worked out some of those issues before she had so many children, but it’s a mistake that is often made.
    Brad has really screwed up.

    Reply
  23. DonnaInMichigan said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:42 am

    I figured there was an intervention..

    I called it a week ago.

    Reply
  24. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Who was it who stated publicly that if Brad was smeared, he would speak out about what he personally knows about Angie? We had guessed at the time that it was Brad’s brother Doug, but never found out with certainty. Any more from this one?

    Reply
  25. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    http://socialitelife.celebuzz.com/archi … g=0&gfmt=e

    A Perfect Example Of The Uncontrolled Bad Behavior Of The Jolie/Pitt Children
    Maddox attacks Pax with an umbrella ( pointed metal tip on end)

    Reply
  26. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    http://socialitelife.celebuzz.com/archive/2009/04/21/brad_pitt_angelina_joile_suburban_ny_shoppers.php?img=2&gfmt=e

    Okay, this is the complete URL to the above post at 12:05 pm

    Reply
  27. sheen said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    @chris:

    i’m with you

    Reply
  28. dina said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    Jane is a smart woman. Listen to your mother Brad!

    Reply
  29. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    Run Like The Wind Braddy, and Take The Kids With You, but don’t raise them yourself, give them to normal people like your mom and pop, or Doug and his wife….
    Judging by the photos of Maddox attacking Pax with the pointed, metal end of the umbrella above, i don’t think Brad and/or Angie ever wash up or change into clean clothes! All that money they could afford to hire someone to clean them up i’d think. Wrinkled, dirty clothes, and not too clean looking faces either….ewww

    Reply
  30. ladybert62 said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    @Patty anne:
    The oldest is Maddox – right? What did t hey do to his hair? The bleached it blonde?

    Reply
  31. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    Has she had more surgery since those photos? Frankly, she doesn’t look super attractive in those photos at all.

    Reply
  32. cutegrly said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    my question is.. Were these pics really taken on 4/21/09?

    Reply
  33. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    That’s the one, Thxs, but really if she breast-fed SNJP, as she has stated, one of the first holds they show new moms is that one, as a matter of fact most hospitals have breast-feeding specialists on hand, are we to honestly believe this woman with all her money could not afford someone to help assist with this. Please, here in the states we got WIC, the La leche advocates, she’s full of it. Last bit on this ,if she truly was in support of breast-feeding and moms ,there are plenty of baby mag’s she could have posed for in support of this, and it would not have come off as a pathetic attempt at “public motherhood”, “Baby” , “Parenting”, etc., no she chose to exploit her breast, whatever twin ,and motherhood by posing for BP for “W” magazine. Real class. JMO The only celebrity mom that I have any respect for is Selma Hayek, and her “putting her money , where her mouth is”, by wet-nursing a poor African mother’s child. Now I may get slammed for that, my answer I never , ever saw AJ slap a boob in her own kids mouth let alone a refugee mom, or anyone else in these countries she has visited. What Selma did , I applaud, that chick’s got balls, and I love her for that.
    @pickwick:
    I could go on about the legal system and how these two could really get themselves into hot water on custody.
    No judge , a honest one anyway, will put up with two spoiled , assholes slamming each other in court, no way, hence my previous post, that scenario, believe it or not is very common in just layman divorce and custody hearings, so I am very surprised they both want to go the nasty route. Also BP has to be careful what kind of mud he wants to sling, he could end up and her as well with no kids.
    He would have to prove her a nut AFTER they had kids not before, if he uses anything prior , most judges will laugh and say “Well, if you knew this about her, you shouldn’t have married her, or had kids by her”.
    I have heard judges say it before when one spouse wants to slam another’s prior history to marriage and kids. She could be a stripper, and unless he can prove her a danger and unfit, the worst that could happen would be, at home studies and supervised visitation, even convicts or prisoners are entitled to see their kids. Unless it can be proven that having any contact with the one parent is too psychologically damaging to the kids, she will always be in their lives. As always JMO.

    Reply
  34. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    @ pickwick – good catch indeed, do you know which sites they pulled that video down from, did they pull it from The Sun by any chance, as that was the one another lurker linked us to I think? That would be interesting if it was removed from there.

    Reply
  35. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    @ Patty Anne – are those photos recent? The boys look much older. They’re going to be beyond the adorable cute age photogenic age soon and a pair of pretty rough and tumble boys by the looks of it. I guess publicity will be more focussed on the twins in the future. Still young enough for cute photo opps. The older ones are growing up fast and either acting out (Maddox and Pax) or refusing to play ball (Shi and Zahara). She looks unbelievably thin and pale there, her face looks like a thinner version of how she looked in the drug den video (interpret that as you will!). And he also looks very pasty-faced and not at all healthy. He’s lost his looks big time.

    Reply
  36. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @pickwick:
    “AJ appears to have been raised in a weird, all-or-nothing world. Plenty of money and plenty of sex and not a lot of real love.”
    That is a very good observation , I will go one step further in my assessment of her nuttiness. This is why IMO, she would kill and eat her own young before as someone else previously posted , than let BP and JA raise the kids. She IMO is the type that would pull an Andrea Yates, I ‘m not posting this as a vacuous statement, nor to mock what Mrs. Yates did to her kids. IMO , Ms. Jolie is amoral, I have said this before, and the all or nothing mentality IMO , makes her very dangerous, and JMO unstable at best.
    There is no moral code of ethics, or reasonable normal compassion within or to gauge herself with, who are her peers, who does she use as a reality check, or sounding board, who are her enabelers besides , BP? There is an ol’ saying that if you really want to win the war, you must be willing to kill , {it, for} whatever it is you are fighting for.In it’s extreme, she would rather, kill than turn over those kids, and if it means the children themselves, so that no one can have them , then yes, IMO she would. Before I get slammed , this is not as uncommon as people may think. In fact, in ancient times {Greek, etc., } women would kill the own children and then themselves before the enemy got to them, so that their children and themselves would not be murdered, raped, etc., They would poison themselves or their babes. There are numerous examples of people either killing themselves, their mates and or their children, if they saw fit, in a fit {passion, rage, percieved threat real or unreal, etc., . Hari- Kari is another example, this is more on the lines of Samurai’s in defeat, or the woman of the Samurai { mutual Hari-Kari}. Not exactly the analogy I want to use with AJ, her drama is self-inflicted, this isn’t war, but to her it maybe.
    As always JMO,

    Reply
  37. ladybert62 said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Mama San:
    Sadly, I agree with all that you said.

    Reply
  38. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Sweetheart, it makes me sad too.

    Reply
  39. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @Keane:

    Keane, the one from the Sun is gone. I did a quick google and every blog that had the video linked to the Sun. Interesting how that came out last May and reviving it here this very week, and presto, gone. Kind of makes those that doubt either her or her handlers don’t read this blog. I specifically did not post that link anywhere.

    I had also asked on a dying thread if anyone could recall what media blitz about AJ hit back then. No one saw where I was going but it was the announcement of the twins. The NE announced there was a video early May and then it was scooped and published by the Sun mid May. It was drowned out with the twin announcement storm right around the same time.

    Reply
  40. chris said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    i don’t remember who asked but they are supposed to be in cannes together, the 20 of this month.

    Reply
  41. DonnaInMichigan said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @chris:

    Chris? It was reported by People Magazine that Brad is already there (yesterday)..why I don’t know, because Inglorious Basterds doesn’t premiere until the 20th

    And that Angelina MIGHT show up if she can get away from the salt set…

    Reply
  42. Jean said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @backalleyknees: “She said she had tried everything and that she couldn’t get the football hold down.”

    I find that hard to believe, with her giant man-hands and all…

    Reply
  43. tyin said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Susanna:
    Susanna, Brad’s movie premiering is for may 20, next wednesday then…

    Reply
  44. tyin said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    @Mama San:
    Hello Mama :)
    i read your post and… you are great! I could have not exposed it better!
    I would have felt really ashamed too, if i were Brad’s parent…

    Reply
  45. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    I don’t have access to many video programs at work but here is the google search if anyone has time to go through them and see if the video is stand alone or only linked to the Sun.

    Reply
  46. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    Oops

    http://www.google.com/search?q=angelina+jolie+drug+video&hl=en&start=10&sa=N

    Reply
  47. chris said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    @DonnaInMichigan:
    i just report you what is said in france, but like always they might be wrong

    Reply
  48. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    I’ve been trying to discover more information about Angelina Jolie’s self admittance to a mental hospital right before she married BBT….Every other HW actor who ever spent time in a mental institution comes up but Angie. All i get with her is Girl Interrupted…a role she played….hummmm
    I was wondering what her diagnosis was/is?
    Did she complete therapy?
    Was she released, or did she sign herself out as one can do on a self admit?

    Reply
  49. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @tyin:
    Thank you hon, I try.
    I have to give credit where credit is due with BP’s parents, IMO they may hate Ms. Jolie, but they have always saved face IMO in the public eye, remember the premier of TCCOBB , when they were all there, that was a strong show of support for their son, and AJ, if not directly, they gave good face, and seemed IMO really try to rally them both, with being there.
    All parents have to go through the painful rite of passage with their kids, when they royally screw up and all a parent can do is love their child , support and guide them through the troubled waters.
    It seems to me, that AJ was not given , shown , or raised in the same vein as BP. BP’s parents I believe have strong religious roots, and a strong sense of family and responsibilty and fairplay, coming up against AJ, and her antics and parenting style, IMO probably shook them to the core, and reeled them a few times., like {no pun intended} getting hit by Mike T. By no means do I think them naive, I’m sure IMO their heads have spun a few times with their son, it’s a whole different ball game when childen are involved . As always JMO.

    Reply
  50. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    Patty, there is an interview out there when she “lost” BBT and freaked and was admitted for a few days.

    Reply
  51. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    Found a copy on yt.

    Reply
  52. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @Mama San:
    You definitely know what you are talking about with the legal stuff. I worked in divorce law.
    I can’t imagine, though, what this much power and influence and, frankly, nasty accusations, will look like. Probably not the garden variety divorce.
    That’s why I think the sexual-abuse stuff is a red herring. She may not mother the way other people mother, but I really, really doubt that accusation. I have seen it hurled at every third client. Nobody should ever throw this one around as lightly as they do (and they do).
    I think the obvious issue is going to be the alleged drug use and the alcohol use.
    There could even be a pretty crazy sex video, but unless it shows something threatening to the children—they are taking part—they are observing- (and I really doubt those two) or drug use) I don’t know that it could have much of an effect on custody.
    I do believe that this breakup will be best for these children. I can’t believe that the way they are living is healthy. If they end up with his parents for temporary custody, that would be very good for them.
    For stability.
    I definitely agree that the kids could be taken from both parents temporarily until things are sorted out. At least, with the kinds of allegations that are being hinted at on this site.

    I don’t want to just slam AJ, because I don’t think that’s fair. I don’t know her—I only know what she has said and done in public. But I do think that she (and Brad, but, let’s face it, she’s the smart one in that pair so I’m holding her to a higher standard on this one) was terribly unkind—cruel, even, to agree to that “W” shoot.
    If they hadn’t done that, I wouldn’t have been as disgusted as I was. People fall in love all the time. But that was harsh.

    It amazes me that someone could get away with that photo shoot after an affair and still be considered saintly. She should have been happy with being known as merely human and now reached for the supernatural.

    Sorry for the long posts.
    I just think the comments here are interesting.
    AJ is interesting, but the entire empire that has been built on them, and now the falling-out—it’s fascinating reading. Like Madoff. The big investor. The Hollywood uber-couple.

    Reply
  53. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Keane,
    We were discussing leering professors, and Oxford. I was reading the New York Times last night and happened on a piece about Nobel Prize-winning poet Derek Walcott losing out on his bid to become the next Oxford professor of poetry because anonymous packages were sent to committee containing info on sexual harassment allegations from years ago.
    He’s pissed.

    Reply
  54. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @another lurker:
    That was the only one I could find when I looked again.
    Let’s face it.
    She’s reading this page and she’s nervous now about that tape being available. Not good for public opinion. Not sure what a judge would make of it, though.
    Again, we go back to Brad deciding to have children with her AFTER all these kinds of issues.
    I feel for the Pitt family.
    This must be very difficult for his parents.
    I sort of feel for Jon Voight. I think he saw this train coming a long time ago. He never liked the idea of all the adoptions. He must be beating himself up for not being a more involved father.

    Reply
  55. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @Patty anne:
    What is this about death contracts? I’ve never heard anything like that. Sounds….scary.

    Reply
  56. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    @another lurker:
    Well, anyone who isn’t anything other than relieved when BBT leaves really should seek mental help.

    Reply
  57. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    @pickwick:
    I tell you what the law absolutely fascinates me, from a layman, and a student, I haven’t decided my major, my attoney{lol} told me to go for Business law, civil would just break my heart.
    I so love to talk about the law, thank you, this is good stuff, I am blown away at human nature, and what we all are capable of, both good, bad, ugly, or indifferent. Don’t be sorry, I rather read a, long, intelligent , insighful, post than just a rant, or gossip, really. I’m sure there will be classes in Pop Culture about these too, remember some college had one on Madonna and her influence on Pop Culture.
    Unfortunately, people tend to forget that the real ugly side of custody is the kids. No One Wins. Period.
    The children will suffer, yes everyone can get along and play nice, but we as parents are foolish to think that our babes no matter how “amicable” {that word is a joke} the divorce is, someone suffers, kids know, and they will resent the fact that their parents for all the goodwill and amicablity , should have worked it out, unless there is domestic violence{in all forms} to a spouse or the kids. I truly believe that a couple , {especially with children} work it out together, as much effort that people put into fighting, they can put the same if not more effort in working it out. As always JMO. I hold this opinion for the Kate and 8 couple too, my advice ,get out of the spotlight, suck it up, and take care of the kids, go to therapy, find
    G-D, whatever, get rid of the BS that has taken the place of love and family. It’s called sacrifice, and letting go of self-love, and self-serving behavior.
    Pickwick, I ‘d love to pick your brain, lol, keep on , I really enjoy your posts.

    Reply
  58. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @pickwick:

    I found a bunch in other places. one on excite in the uk. Can’t copy the link for some reason.

    But as the wise saying going, the Internet if FOREVER.

    Reply
  59. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @ another lurker – ah so you’re saying Brange gave The Sun the twins scoop to try to deflect from the drugs den tape? Do you think that’s how they managed to quash the second half of the tape from being broadcast? Apparently the content of that part was much worse and far more damning, possibly showing her actually taking drugs and talking about worse stuff. I noticed The Sun article was also a MAJOR ass-kiss piece. Look how she’s turned her life around and saved the world since then etc, literally. They called it a waring to stars like Amy Winehouse to clean up their act, they spun it that AJ was a shining example and role model etc to keep her on side. This removal of the tape is an interesting development.

    @ pickwick – that’s funny about the tutor, yes, I’ve not really heard of any sex scandals at oxford, it was all very, very strict and my college was supposedly a liberal one!

    Reply
  60. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    Yes it does , it always goes to if a person had knowledge to ” prior bad acts” than how can he complain, a sex-tape, even “swingers” have rights and can have parties, and as long as the kids were not harmed or involved in any way. So what, if she{AJ} screwed a dog{allegedly} , By no means am I advocating for AJ, I’m just playing devil’s advocate , all sides have to be examined. If it was the family pet, yeah then maybe he could make a case, then again , if she did this before the twins, he is just as bad. He should have got out quick when he was behind, I don’t see how either one of them will come out “smelling like a rose”, no matter how much they clean up. It had better be sincere if they choose to get their shit straight, the general public is now on to their {BP&AJ} BS and will IMO not tolerate it, or the movie exec’s, Hollyweird, Washington, as always JMO. If they still want movie careers and expect us the general public to pay to watch their movies, etc., they will have to play nice in the public forum on some level. IDT, that she will get away with any “public” bashing of Pitt, she maybe smarter but he is the HW heavyweight. JMO.

    Reply
  61. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    @Keane:
    I was wondering about that drug den video. I watched it a couple of times trying to make sense of what AJ was saying, but I didn’t see or hear anything too controversial. I was looking for the part where she talks about it being good smack and not the shit that’s been stepped on. I was like “am I missing something?” I guess it wasn’t me who was missing something…. it was the video LOL.

    How’s everyone?!

    Reply
  62. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @Mama San:
    @Mama San:
    Civil law becomes part therapy unless you’re able to just turn it off. I’m not geared to turn that stuff off.
    I think the hardest thing is that the people going through the divorce (and it’s mostly divorce) don’t have perspective. It’s just about impossible to give them that perspective. Many want to fight, fight, fight over everything, and can’t acknowledge anything positive the other party (spouse) is doing.
    An unscrupulous person who can stomach anything could really take people for a ride. They are angry and they are ready to spend any amount—money they don’t have—to attack.
    The good thing is adoptions. That’s a pleasant respite.
    The other bad thing is that you work for yourself and make money in fits and starts—sometimes barely making anything and sometimes a bit of a windfall (you make up bills, then) OR you work with a group of people that will always include someone a little sleazy.
    Have you thought about becoming an attorney/mediator?
    There’s a very positive movement toward collaborative divorce. The attorneys work together with both clients to find the best situation. Of course, it doesn’t work for people who are determined to argue, but it is a growing field.
    Frankly, you blew my mind when you described what would unfold. If only most clients would be that rational and intelligent. (!)
    Anyway, I can’t take it.
    I’ve gone in another direction entirely.
    Education.
    It’s a relief.
    You should go for it, mamasan. You are obviously smart, and you have a good head for this stuff. You’re here for the same reason I’m here, I think. It’s a puzzle. The media is telling us one thing, but we don’t believe it and we’re trying to figure out what’s really going on—mostly because other people are trying to thwart us and we’re too curious!

    Reply
  63. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    Angie told that she had hired a hit man to kill her, but changed her mind and called it off@pickwick:

    Reply
  64. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    @Keane:
    Wow.
    I think you two nailed it on the Sun ass kiss/drug den piece.

    Reply
  65. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Patty anne:
    My God!!
    Do you think she was just saying that for attention or do you think it was true?
    That is really sad. Something is very wrong with her thinking if this is true.

    Reply
  66. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Hmmm, interesting article…especially about the Brad not knowing about the video. Isn’t this also around the time they started having problems and the rumors started?

    http://www.topnews.in/light/angelina-jolie-upset-over-drug-video-leak-211296

    Reply
  67. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    Okay, it was because a program was running I couldn’t copy and paste.

    Here is a working video. Let’s see how long it lasts.

    http://entertainme.excite.co.uk/news/2233/Angelina-Jolie-stars-in-drugs-den-video

    Reply
  68. Mama San said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    @pickwick:
    After this I go to go, Thxs, I appreciate your insight and I honestly will give thought to what you said. I will leave on this note and give the board a rest, { I seemed to have taken over with my musings, I apologize}. Unfortunately my children and I had to go through the very same thing that I described , not once, not twice, but three times, custody battle after battle, this last round I lost my daughter to my domestic abuser.
    One. I went back, to him after our initial divorce- Big Mistake- HUGE!!!
    Two. I had no money
    Three. He paid for his justice. Nothing was proven with facts , just conjecture, and emergency hearing after hearing, all the hoops I had to jump through, I did it all, did not matter. He had five attorneys from one firm plus the GAL to represent him, me… I had Legal Aid, she did all she could do, we were f*cked from the get go. He went after custody out of spite , to hurt me, it had nothing to do with our child. This is a tactic of domestic abusers. I could go on, but I won’t . I may end up representing myself, I hear he owes $20,000.00 grand to his attorney and had to re-finance the house my mom and I helped buy, and the bottom line is, forget him, is that my little girl was taken away from her mom ,brothers and sister, and extended family, to live alone in a huge house with her alcoholic, abusive, woman-hating father.
    Anyway, I may go into civil or not, I got a bigger fish to fry, I’m going after the judge on charges of judicial misconduct, and filing a lawsuit against the GAL for perjury. I might even sue the county, maybe go to the supreme court, my rights and the rights of my babes were violated, I have been in contact with the ACLU, who knows, what me and my kids went through shouldn’t happen to anyone or their children. I like the idea, that you brought up about mutual agreement with the attornies and both parties, it’s a good cause and I hope they get some movement. But your right “both parties must agree”, hee hee, lawyer speak.
    As always JMO, on the gossip, thxs again Pickwick for the very interesting convo, look forward to posting at ya’ later.
    Everyone have a good night.

    Reply
  69. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    @another lurker:
    Angelina Jolie is said to be upset over footage of her as a youngster in a New York drug den shown recently. Join Angelina Jolie Fan Club

    That is too funny.
    No wonder we’re all here sick of this charade.
    Those were the first to sentences from the link from another lurker.

    Reply
  70. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @Mama San:
    Sadly, justice is all about money.
    The good thing is that he is deeply in the hole from fighting you. It might not take much for him to fall over the edge.
    I’m surprised and pleased you had help from legal aid. I’m assuming from that fact that there was a written history of his abuse.

    I’m very sorry to hear about all this.
    Maybe we’ll talk tomorrow.
    Hope you have a good night.

    Reply
  71. benjaminbutton14 said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @Mama San:
    bb14, Well said

    Reply
  72. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    We need to revisit that link that has the video in the next few hours/days and see if it also gets taken down. LOL, I was a bit speculative when I found that link thinking posting it here would risk its existence. Guess it is threatening here because we all know everyone is lurking for dirt on here in this one stop shop. Seriously, I don’t think she was at risk of her fans finding it. Can you imagining the loons googling her name and the words “drug” and “video”?

    Reply
  73. benjaminbutton14 said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @sama:
    bb14. I read awhile back that Jane had a meeting with Jen and told her that Brad still loves her and always will and she also said that she hopes the 2 of them will find each other again. Nothing would give her greater pleasure than to see them together. I know Ian said NO they won’t be together but stranger things have happened.

    Reply
  74. benjaminbutton14 said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @Susanna:
    Hi Susanna, I watched the whole thing. I found with Noah, that in my opinion he was beating around the bush with some of the answers to the questions because of being sued. Most of the questions asked of him we already knew, I think the best person answering the questions for us was IAN he was really great quick and to the point. WELL DONE IAN

    Reply
  75. skatz said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    When will Brad and Angie file a lawsuit against Ian for all the bullshit he keeps publishing?

    Reply
  76. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @skatz:

    When they can prove he’s lying.

    Reply
  77. LurkeyLoo said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    How is he in Cannes AND in Rehab? WTF????? @DonnaInMichigan:

    Reply
  78. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @ another lurker – thing is though The Sun is the biggest selling newspaper in the UK. It has sales figures of 20 million copies per day (I assume some of this will be internet hits). A lot of people must have heard about and/or seen that video before now. The damage (if any) would have been done then I would have thought. Why does it matter that it is now being brought up on this site who must have a readership in the thousands I would have thought? Unless they weren’t about to go in for a custody battle then and they are now. But you would have thought they would have done it before now if that was the reason. I wonder why it is? Just because of the other stuff this site has brought to light? Seeing that in combination with these stories is may be why its more dangerous now. Last May everyone thought she was a saint after all….maybe the climate is different now.

    @ another lurker – BTW re: Katie Price and Peter Andre – word from a Brit gossip site is that the “gay” in the family may not actually be Peter surprisingly! They suggest it is her, and that has been her bent (excuse the pun!) for the last couple of years. I am very surprised because she’s always been open about everything and said she wasn’t in to women. It would explain why she hasn’t wanted to have sex with him much for a while though. I will report back if I hear any more!

    Reply
  79. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    That rehab thing—I don’t know. It isn’t a facility.

    Could AJ get away with visiting some guy in some state and calling that rehab?

    Wherever they are, they aren’t together. it’s over. Ian has been right on top of this from the beginning.
    Why do the families spill to Ian?
    Because he has the nerve to print it and isn’t beholden to whatever powers-that-be?

    Reply
  80. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @ another lurker – the onus is actually on Ian to prove that he is telling the truth as a matter of fact, as opposed to them proving he is lying, well it is in the UK anyway. So they have an even greater chance of successfully suing than people may think. And yet they haven’t. Go figure!

    Reply
  81. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @ LurkeyLoo – he’s not in a residential facility. He’s an outpatient. So presumably he can take time out from the treatment/therapy for work obligations.

    Reply
  82. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    Keane,
    The fact that they are pulling that video shows how afraid they really are.
    I thought this was just silly/fun/ puzzling before.
    The fact that they are watching this and taking the trouble to pull this video after all this time speaks volumes about the veracity of some of this information.

    Reply
  83. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @Mama San:Ohhhhh Mama!! That is an unbelievable story! Im so sorry for all you’ve been through, I hope you go after the Inglorious Basterds and put them all down!!! I hope it all comes out right for you and your family and that you stay strong and FIGHT!!!

    Reply
  84. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Here on the pics I was looking for where you can tell she is whacked out. Her eyes are very dilated and Bobo’s aren’t.

    http://www.popsugar.com/244066

    Reply
  85. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Keane,
    Another good observation.
    If some of these things weren’t true–or weren’t coming from the families themselves—they would sue pronto. And this would be taken down.
    Why is it still up?
    Because they are afraid to touch it–afraid of what is going to come out—exactly who these sources are. Pulling this site and having Ian give up his sources will get this fight going—in a more public way than this!

    Reply
  86. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    She really is rambling on like a high idiot in that video. I can’t remember which thread it was where someone listed all of her off the wall quotes and the dominating theme in the sexual quotes is control/domination. “I want someone to be able to put me on the bottom”, and then there was another one and in the video she’s talking about being tied down as a way for a person to keep her there (no shit AJ, that’s the point of tying someone down). I know we’ve discussed if she was molested when she was younger. This is going to sound really sick when I say it, but bare with me: She obviously likes control, but why is she on such a bend to have someone take control away from her again? The behavior doesn’t make sense. So, is she messed up because someone sexually abused her as a young girl, or did she gradually begin to enjoy having that sense of control taken away? JMO. I don’t understand and I’m not sure what I said made any sense.

    Reply
  87. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @cuze:
    If I were his mom, I would have to agree with you there, Cuze. I would be worried sick.

    Reply
  88. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @Keane:I saw a pic of “Jordan” making out with a girl at a strip club recently, I think it was posted on Perez.

    Reply
  89. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    @benjaminbutton14:
    When did Brad Pitt become The Man? Entire websites that focus on him? He is the driving force of any relationship he is in giving his partner/significant other/wife an edge up in the popularity contest that is HW? Would we all be decidedly split if Angelina Jolie had chosen Joe the Plumber to breed furiously with? If Jennifer Aniston had married ANYONE else and had victimized in her divorce, would we be as sympathic to her plight? Why is it that people think that if you land Brad Pitt you have moved up the ladder by all the rungs? That you have reached the “Golden Heights” of success in love and life? Then once having achieved that “status” the media circus works furiously to build you up even higher so that when the fall comes it is gleefully recieved by the public?

    Witness one Britney Spears. It is said that she generates 120million per year in photos, interviews, selling mags, advertising renues, etc. and that is a lot of cash for someone whose best days are behind her.

    Can anyone imagine the cash cow that is the Brand? While AJ/BP may or may not be together, depending on who you want to believe, the media will never let it die because if nothing else they know a money maker when they see one. And that is precisely why Jen Aniston is a player in the game, even if it is an unwilling one. If the media let’s her off the hook, the fascination and the so called rivalry dies.

    Brad Pitt is a cheater and he left his wife for another woman. WOW, what a catch…

    There is nothing attractive about that. Not then, not now, and certainly not in the future!

    Reply
  90. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    @Patty anne:
    So true, Patty anne, and as we’ve been saying Karma definitely can be a bitch.

    Reply
  91. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @Patty anne:You know I think this was just another mone of her evil machinations. BBT was with Laura Dern and Angie said if he didn’t leave LD and marry HER that she would kill herself. She apparently botched a “suicide” and checked into a mental hospital to prove to him how serious she was. He immediately went back to her and suddenly she was a happy little girl again! PSYCHO! She will stop at nothing to get what she wants! Of course this is old news and everyone probably already knows this story.

    Reply
  92. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    @ pickwick – totally, it all just makes it more likely doesn’t it. As does the fact that AJ herself was pretty obviously posting for a very long time on here until she realised she wasn’t getting anywhere so hired people to do it for her. I don’t think you were around at the time, this went on for maybe 6 weeks and stopped about a month or so ago. If you go back and look over old threads you will be able to see her posts, Suzy Q was one of her most popular monikers and she was even posting under Angelina Jolie for a while – it was a double bluff intended to catch me out but I didn’t fall for it. Her posts were characterised by very similar typography (she was obviously doing it from her Blackberry) and some things she said which gave the game away quite a bit. She also had this really lame strategy that if she got someone to do posts for her in bad French under her user names that this would convince us it wasn’t really her. It was pathetic and went on for aboslutely ages, she just kept plugging away at it hoping one day it would convince someone, it was ridiculous! (This is where I get my opinion other than her pulic behaviour that she is not very bright). And then I got my e-mail hacked into and someone posted under my full real name. (The hacking also happened to Ian). I had to report it to the police and everything. If I could trace them then they would prosecute but it is just difficult to do. All of these events made me realise they are scared shitless about what is coming out. Why on earth would anyone go to those lengths unless this was all true I do not know.

    Reply
  93. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    @Keane:

    See, I believe she had Jack Black “spill her secret accidently” about the twins for sure to distract this. Remember when she acted all surprised?

    And I know all about the Sun! I had a British roommate when I went to school at UF in Gainesville during those murders. He got interviewed and said, great, my mom hates this rag. LOL.

    Ian probably has his sources verified. You can’t sue a publication if you are quoting someone. Quotes don’t have to necessarily be verbatim either.

    I think they know people are coming here and collecting dirt. Their time in the artificial light is ending.

    Reply
  94. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Given all the functions they’ve attended, and the photo ops pimping out the children, I wonder if some smart reporter has gotten DNA from all the parties, had it tested and therefore knows absolutely the blood relationships. If they sue, and everything is not kosher, that would destroy her career for sure. Now that I think about it, I wonder someone did do that and revealed the results to those involved.

    Reply
  95. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @another lurker:Whats going on, did they re-release the video of AJ in the drug den rambling? I saw that video months ago and thought it was pretty boring, what difference does it make if the video is making the rounds again> Unless the point is that the media is starting to turn on them? But then, why did it go out months and months ago? HELP!

    Reply
  96. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    And as Ian said yesterday, a liar. He said he wasn’t screwing AJ before he split with JA…so he’s a liar and a cheat. Not very attractive in my book. And a sex addict & alcoholic…getting worse by the minute. But the fascination with them as a couple is undeniable…in-a-train-wreck-can’t-look-away sort of way. The thing that is awful is they have kids. Otherwise who cares what they do to each other…..Pitt made his bed, etc, etc.

    Reply
  97. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @backalleyknees:

    I met a comediene who believed in getting educated about sex if he was going to joke about it. He met the woman the movie 9 1/2 weeks was based on at her lecture. She had such a effed up sex life and it kept taking more and more to get off, it went that far. She said in the lecture that because she took it that far, she would never be able to have a normal sex life without it involving pain.

    Reply
  98. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @Keane:I think I remember some posts by Suzy Q, I might have to go back and re-read. I think they are afraid to confront IAN because to address it just adds credence to the rumours, if they ignore it they can call it all BS and not worth trifling with, IDK

    Reply
  99. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @ Caribsmom – I just looked at that, do you think she’s actually snogging her though? You can’t see anything and it doesn’t really look like it to me. It looks like she’s kissing her on the cheek because the other woman’s face is turned the other way. But what with the story on holymoly, you never know I guess…!

    Reply
  100. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @Caribsmom:

    It had never been released. Rumors of it being for sale hit in May of last year. It most likely would have spread far and wide but she pulled out the twin card.

    Reply
  101. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    Uh, I didn’t know that story. I’m waaay behind on this stuff.
    I didn’t even know she took BBT from Laura Dern!
    Dern sure got lucky on that count. She has that gorgeous, talented musician-husband now.
    She checked into a mental hospital because she wanted BBT?
    That’s just wacky.
    He’s …..uh…..well, he doesn’t have much to recommend him. Not exactly…..intelligent. More like someone you’d meet in a Waffle House next to the interstate.
    What was Laura Dern doing with that goof?

    Reply
  102. ladybert62 said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @pickwick:
    Now there’s an idea! I met my husband through a friend at a bar – dang, never occurred to me to look “in a Waffle house next to the interstate.” Laughling out loud again at work … :-)

    Reply
  103. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    @Keane:
    My God!
    You and Ian were hacked for posting here?
    The bad French stuff is really funny.
    Should I quit posting?
    Is this dangerous?
    wow.
    I woke up a normal, boring person and now I feel like a spy!

    Reply
  104. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    @Z:
    We all are intrigued so I guess that you could percieve that as caring. It is a trainwreck! And we all like being in the front row watching…LOL!

    Reply
  105. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    I’m not backing down for saying Billy Bob belongs in a Waffle Hut, no matter what anyone does to my email.
    Or that if I was anyone in this fiasco, it would be Laura Dern!

    Reply
  106. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @ another lurker – yes I think that’s probably true, this has been like a symposium on Brangelina dirt. Kate has a particularly good back catalogue of info from her early days archived in her head – she’s incredible. (We miss you Kate, come back soon!). That’s what I’ve said before, all you need to do is to pull a lot of stuff together that people don’t really know about (stuff that has been swept under the carpet by their PR no doubt) and you have a really interesting anti-narrative to their image without doing any more research than that. People would be shocked to see it all put together I reckon. Guess that’s why they pulled that tape then! And re: the Jack Black bit yeah that would make sense, get a bit of publicity for their film and keep the spotlight on her at Cannes – you are very astute! And re: what you’re saying about sex, I have heard a very similar argument about the sex life of an A-list celeb from one of his close friends. She said that when you can have everything you want sexually, you need more and more perverted stuff to get off. He looks positively clean though in comparison with AJ! No wonder when these people get together they push everything to the limit. They’re all just as out there sexually I would have thought.

    Reply
  107. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Isn’t that weird?
    It’s like HW has a Homecoming King and Brad Pitt is it.
    I’m still going with my gut instinct that he is probably the more stable parent.

    Reply
  108. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @pickwick:don’t use your real email address

    Reply
  109. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    Where has Kate been anyway?

    Reply
  110. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    @DebFrmHell:I believe she’s on vacation.

    Reply
  111. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    When H*LL freezes over…..the truth is mightier than the wealthy perverted brand machine@skatz:

    Reply
  112. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @pickwick:
    The Man is teflon…all the crap just seems to slide off of him and stick to someone else in this drama. And for all the mud-slinging, back-stabbing, adulterous ways his “GREATNESS” seems to get higher. **shakes head in disbelief**

    Reply
  113. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    @Keane:
    “he said that when you can have everything you want sexually, you need more and more perverted stuff to get off.” And that really is an addiction and true of any addiction. As it progresses a person need more and more to get off.

    Reply
  114. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @pickwick:
    I believe he would be more stable, too. She is really mentally ill and has no extended family, except James. Pitt has his parents, who do seem stable to me. Having said that, I think he needs some serious help with his addictions….not just some spiritual counselor. And he needs to get some humility – if that is possible.

    Reply
  115. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @ pickwick – create a dummy e-mail address with a made-up name and location and use that when you post, then if they do hack you they won’t be able to find anything out about you. Kate told us to do this at the beginning and I was like re, what are you talking about, why would anyone need to do that? I thought she was being really paranoid, then dumbass got hacked! They hate Kate almost as much as they hate me cos she has some inside info and an archive of Brangelina history in her head, but she was a bit smarted than me. I honestly had no idea anyone would care enough about what I said to want to hack me. Dumbasses really shot themselves in the foot though. Posting under my real name is a crime both in the UK and in the US. If they try to go after me I’ll know it was them that hacked me as otherwise they wouldn’t know anything about me. Then there will ensue a lovely little criminal case against them for all the world to see. They so silly.

    But anyway, yeah that’s pretty much how I can spot the fakes a mile off. They’ve been here from day one and for months it was only me, Kate, Section 9 now and again, p and sometimes Canuck. Then finally we got a few more people here. The whole threads used to be taken up with me arguing with Angelina’s various usernames. And it was defo her at first, one of Ian’s sources told him she was doing it and it was obvious which usernames it was as there were so few of us. She had the lamest of arguments as well – she kept trying to tell us the site was being used by a creative writing class to do an academic study on gossip. I was like creative writing classes don’t do studies on gossips dumbass, popular culture studies classes or psychology classes maybe, not creative writing classes – they write stuff – duh!!! This is how I know for a fact she’s really thick you see, doesn’t even know what goes on in different degree courses. She’s beyond stupid.

    Reply
  116. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    I too saw that video, and when i heard her say she wanted “someone who could put me on the bottom”, a light went off in my brain…. MAMS, the sex scene on the bed, Brad on top of Angie, she strains upward as if to nip him and take control, however, he exerts strength to shove her back underneath him physically, after which she gots bat-chyt horny….dead give a way to them already being intimate with one another…he knew what she wanted and was experienced in giving it to her, her way. Brad’s a liar…period@backalleyknees:

    Reply
  117. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @Z:
    “And he needs to get some humility – if that is possible.”

    ROFLMFAO! Best line of the day!

    The reason they always have to rent these huge mansions is so that their own egos have a suite of their own!

    Reply
  118. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @Keane:She likes to spout about how she graduated at 16 from Beverly Hills High School (arguably one of the best public high schools in California, if not the U.S.) what she doesn’t tell people is that to graduate is merely a matter of collecting enough credits, which can be in P.E., Art or any other subject that is not particularly intellectually challenging. You know what would really be a hoot, would be if some interviewer, whose read the book, starts questioning her about what ever book she’s photographed carrying around.

    Reply
  119. Kate said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Keane:
    Hey guys I am still away and not really where I can post but I have been reading on my BB.Will have to catch up later , I have a situation I am dealing with right now an will not be home til next week some time. So , thought they were divorced or is that not for sure?

    Reply
  120. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    When I watched it, the part that really stuck out for me was that she wanted someone to hold her down to keep her still.
    I believe it is very possible that someone who had been sexually abused at a young age would find that exciting in a deep part of themselves. Our neurons are wired by our experiences. The best description I’ve ever heard is that they are like a truck that is driving down a muddy road. There are deep tire tracks. It is very hard to jump the truck over the worn paths to take a different direction. The brain has been rewired to what it knows–to what it remembers.
    (One reason I love Proust).The memory is powerful.
    Of course, she could have just been blowing smoke (so to speak:) and trying to sound tough.
    But I could easily believe she was abused.
    It’s sad, really.
    Girls are preyed on—and the sudden attention from men as she grew up, the lack of of an involved father—or a father whose behavior she could emulate and respect, the lack of supervision. Just a bad brew.
    I feel a little bad even speculating on that—it just feels so private.

    Reply
  121. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    LOL…I can dream. Funny. But, if he doesn’t, he is going to have a hard time conquering his addictions. I think most addicts need to hit bottom to get help. Maybe he has with all the crap AJ does…..I would not want to be him! But some people’s bottoms are very low….so we’ll see. Esp. if their ego’s are sooo enormous!

    Reply
  122. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @Kate:
    Hi Kate, we missed you the other night on IUCTV. : )

    Reply
  123. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    One of the few things I do know.
    I remember reading a quote from JA when she was married to BP.
    She described him as a “land man”.
    She said his passion was acquiring property—lands and houses.
    They had that ridiculously huge mansion he had remodeled or something.
    When he left her, JA got rid of it.
    He likes really big mansions. chateaus. manors. whatever.

    Reply
  124. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @pickwick:As well as what Keane said, you’ll notice that we always put the disclaimer JMO or IMHO or something like that. Everyone has a right to their opinion, but when people come on and say emphatically that they know for a fact….that is what could get them in trouble if it all came down to it.

    Reply
  125. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    @Different Guest:
    Lots of kids graduate high school early.
    I think Woody Allen’s kid had finished college by the time he was 16.

    Reply
  126. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    Thanks for the tip.
    I hadn’t noticed, but I’ll be careful.
    IMO.
    Just practicing. :)

    Reply
  127. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    @Keane:
    Hey Keane, I am curious, did they stop posting after they hacked into your e-mail? Get scared off? I remember Suzy Q et al, but I don’t remember when you were hacked.

    Reply
  128. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @DebFrmHell:You actually bring up a good point, one I was thinking about today after Ian posted this one. IMO the reason AJ hates the Pitts so much is because Brad loves them so much. She just cannot stand to know that he loves someone other then her, her narcisissim wouldnt allow for that. So I wonder how she feels when he shows his love for his children, does she get jealous, does she take it out on the kids, IDK what do you all think?

    Reply
  129. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Glad I didn’t see that movie.
    I haven’t wanted to see anything that either of them have done since the breakup.
    That “W” magazine spread was just so icky.
    I heard that Benjamin Button was good.
    But I’m having trouble getting up the spirit to rent it.

    Reply
  130. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @pickwick:Really? Which kid was that? One of the Previn children? Im not being sarcastic either, just curious.

    Reply
  131. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @Z:
    I can’t speak for Brad, but if I was in his position right now, it sure would feel like hitting bottom.

    Divorce and Separation are difficult—especially with kids.

    Reply
  132. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @pickwick:
    And architecture…..so that probably goes hand in hand. I wonder if he hadn’t been so good looking, if he would have been just a regular, creative guy. The looks fed his ego, no doubt.

    About looks, I keep hearing AJ got plastic surgery to look like her mom. Can anyone tell me if she said that or if it’s speculation? I believe she got it to be better looking…not to look like her mother. But that’s my opinion.

    Reply
  133. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @Z:
    I am an addict. Been thru rehab a few times and have been lucky enough to have survived and gotten stronger. BP’s “rehab” sounds more like some new age kind of thing. If it helps, yay! Methinks, waste of money and time. What he is trying to escape from by hitting the bottle or smoking or a joint or whatevers he will be stuck with for his entire life. No amount of honesty or number of programs will change those facts. It is kind of like going thru the stages of grief. Acceptance is the last stage. He f’d up and he will pay for a lifetime…

    Reply
  134. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    I’ll have to check. It’s the boy that Woody and Mia had together. I think it was their only child together.
    He has the name of a blues singer or something. Satchmo. Something like that.
    After Woody and Mia’s split, I think he changed his name.
    He’s supposed to be phenomenally smart.

    Reply
  135. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @pickwick:
    I couldn’t agree more…and that is why, I think, he finally is looking into rehab, etc. I hope he follows through. He’s going to have to work hard…I hope he does it – for the kids, at least.

    Reply
  136. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    @Patty anne:Yea, someone said on here that when the director yelled CUT they wouldnt stop and the crew just kind of let them get on with it!

    Reply
  137. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    @Patty anne:
    The sex scene in the beginning? Or was there another one? I couldn’t make it all the way through that movie. For some reason it made me really uncomfortable. She always looked like she was trying too hard.

    Reply
  138. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @pickwick:OH Yea yea yea! I remember that now. Well, with Mia Farrow and Woody Allen has parents he’s got some primo genes for intelligence!

    Reply
  139. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    Still haven’t seen the first ‘W” issue with them pretending to be a happy family. It turns my stomach. That whole thing was just so “dastardly” to quote BP about the affair that “never” happened.

    Reply
  140. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    @Caribsmom:Seamus (formerly known as Satchel).
    @pickwick:My point was she uses her early graduation as proof she’s intelligent, what she never talks about is what she took to graduate early. I have concerns about their “home schooling” the children, in my experience, parents who lack a college education, unless they are voracious readers (so far I haven’t met any), don’t do right by their children educationally.

    Reply
  141. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @Z:
    Do you think maybe he will be a little different now?
    He always seemed pretty affable and funny. Like a pretty decent guy, really.
    Only bad thing about him I can see is that he keeps falling in love with any woman he appears with in a movie.
    That’s not good for a guy’s life, IMO.
    (nod there and thanks to caribsmom)
    It would be good if he could separate his life from his movies. IMO. At least his love life.

    Reply
  142. Caribsmom said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    I’ll be back later, my hubby has made a pot of homemade chicken curry made with fresh cilantro and tomatoes from our garden YUM YUM and just put out shrimp cocktails, so I must go now! xoxoxox Tamara

    Reply
  143. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @pickwick:
    Thank you for transcribing what I was trying to say in such a good way. I know what you mean on how it makes you feel dirty to even speculate on her emotional/sexual issues. It makes me sad that no one watched out or protected her like they should’ve. In that respect I feel for her, but if she is perpetuating the cycle with her kids by saying crazy quotes like the babies one…old girl needs to be tied down with restraints and the help of a good psychiatrist. JMO.

    Reply
  144. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @pickwick:
    I think they had a girl and a boy…if I remember correctly. Yes, I heard he was very smart.

    Reply
  145. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @Caribsmom:
    I think she hates them because they loved Jennifer. JA used to go to Missouri when she was on hiatus and Brad was filming. They lost a doughter in the divorce so of course they would want her back with open arms into thier lives. They all loved each other.

    I can see her being friends with BP and his parents. I cannot help but to hope that they are never romantically linked again. She has made her own little niche in the filmworld, looks happier than ever, seems content with her life and makes her own money. She has no need for the anguish that would come with forever having AJ in her life due to custody arrangemnts involving the children. Bad enough that the tabs have linked them forever…

    Reply
  146. Kate said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @Different Guest:
    She was in the section for troubled kids, she did not really grad early she basically was seperated off with the misfits and forced to get her certificate .She hated school.

    Reply
  147. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    @Different Guest:
    I was doing a poor job of agreeing with you.
    Crowing about graduating from high school is something best left to someone deep in the hills of West Virginia.
    Even at 16. It’s just common.
    I had never heard that she had bragged about graduating high school. I’m the person here who is new–and behind.
    And I’ve never liked the homeschool thing for those kids. I read that a French school that had the eldest for a bit were concerned about him because he came to the school—loved it—made a sweet friendship with a little girl—and got ripped away.
    I thought that was sad.

    Reply
  148. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @Kate:She still had to do the credits, and yeah the “alternative school” was basically babysitting until you are 16 – the legal age you can quit school. In order to get the certificate she would have had to do the credits – again at the alternative school in those days, you got credit for showing and breathing.

    Reply
  149. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    @pickwick:
    We’ve talked about that up here…and I really agree, as do some others, that it is entirely possible – if not probable – that she was abused. She acts like a sexually abused person, who has never gotten help. It is sad – but she needs to get help now that she has kids. It seems her thinking is very skewed – like incest is OK (and I say that from the kissing brother pictures – not just Ian’s source). I like that analogy of the truck tracks…really makes sense. Kate said a while back that AJ’s mom had boyfriends in and out all the time…and one of them could have abused her. It appears there were lax morals and no supervision (live-in bf at 14, w/ knife play). And if the source that said AJ slept with her mom’s bf is correct, that is just adding more to this whole theory.

    Reply
  150. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    @pickwick:A lot more common now – what does that say about the state of our education system – than it was 20 years ago.
    @pickwick:they really screwed the kids there, Mad was in the school for what 6 weeks and for him to a get a place someone else was denied one, I don’t think any of the other Lycees will allow them to enroll the kids, too bad it’s a great education.

    Reply
  151. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    @Kate:
    Wow! Hey Kate, I would love to read more about this…do you have any links?

    Reply
  152. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @ Diffferent Guest – yes, unfortunately she is somewhat delusional on that point, she thinks she’s very bright. She also went to drama school and did that dreadful method acting that I don’t rate at all. It may help people to get into a character but it doesn’t teach them technique. I trained as a kid in speech, mime and drama, took LAMDA (kind of equivalent to RADA) exams in all three. Lots of reciting of not very exciting poetry and miming walking on different surfaces and so on. You weren’t allowed or it would not have been possible to do the drama exams without doing the speech or mime. I can always tell when actors aren’t trained properly fron things like not even intoning the right word in a sentence. AJ’s acting – don’t even get me started. That eyebrow – I can’t go on!

    @ Z – the fakes are still here every dau just using much more subtle tactics as the other ones weren’t getting them anywhere. They haven’t posted under my name again after I pointed out that I’d reported them to the police. They did deign to post me some lovely lyrics from a song however along the lines of “don’t turn it around on me, you’ve made too many mistakes and they won’t forget or except my apology (they won’t be hearing one!), they are the all-seeing eye and they know my every move”. I was just like o fuck off angelina, when are you going to get it into your thick head you are not God!

    Reply
  153. g said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    @pickwick:

    Pickwick, a lot I didn’t know either. Just recently started reading some old articles on her. However, the folks at FF did of a time line of the metamorphosis from homely bad girl to Hollywood’s golden couple. Not sure of its accuracy, just their opinions but it does sort of give a rundown or summary.

    From FF:
    “I would like to start a timeline. Of the metamorphasis from homely bad girl to Hollywood’s golden couple. I really think that during the Billy Bob days, AJ decided to change her image, and take Jennifer Anistons life/title away.”

    Screen debut as a child alongside her famous father Jon Voight in the 1982 film Lookin’ to Get Out
    Moves to NY to attend acting classes
    Makes B-list movie Cyborg 2
    Lands role of ‘Libby’ in cult film Hackers, falls in love with her attached co-star, Jonny Lee Miller
    Married Jonny Lee Miller
    Starts filming “Gia” – becomes a drug addict and lesbian “to stay in character” then keeps staying in character after filming stops
    Makes “Foxfire” in which she plays a badass lesbian
    Cheats on JLM with Jenny Shimizu
    Awarded for Gia – Golden Globe
    Has affair with Timothy Hutton
    Lives in NY again and takes classes – considers hiring a hitman to kill herself
    Has first nose job
    Makes Girl Interrupted
    Won the oscar for Girl Interrupted
    Pictures of her kissing her brother surface everywhere
    Reports surface she was mean to her co-stars on Girl Interrupted
    Has famous “breakdown” interview – dad tries to help her
    Is reintroduced to BBT by mutual friend – starts affair with him even though he is engaged to Laura Dern
    Goes to mental asylum because she “is convinced she killed someone”, but actually to manipulate BBT into leaving LD and marrying her
    Married Billy Bob Thornton
    Landed plum role of Lara Croft
    Made Tomb Raider with her dad
    Goes with BBT to Cambodia
    Promised $5 million to a wildlife preserve in Cambodia in exchange for Maddox
    In 2000, has an affair with Nic Cage while filming Gone In 60 Seconds, Patricia Arquette files for divorce at the end of that year
    Approaches the UN to become a UN Goodwill Ambassador – first step in the whitewash of her image
    2 months later Donates $ 1million to the UNHCR’s Afgahnistan Emergency Relief Fund
    Shows up in Pakistan wearing a blue shawl over her head, imitating the Virgin Mary
    Makes Original Sin
    Denies affair with Antonio Banderas
    Caused Melanie Griffiths to turn up on set everyday during the filming of Original Sin
    Met Brad at a concert/event. BBT and her sat next to Brad, doing their usual porn show – decided how to finally whitewash her tarnished image; by stealing the other half of the ‘golden couple’, and chose Brad.
    Adopts Maddox in March 2002
    BBT went on the road and never returned
    BBT makes infamous ’sofa’ comment
    Had a photo shoot of her and Maddox – PR for being a single mother
    Dad makes public plea for her to get help for her mental problems – she declines
    The feud with her dad is reported everywhere
    Makes Tomb Raider 2 and pimps Maddox as often as possible
    Makes Taking Lives
    Denies affair with Ethan Hawke
    Uma Thurman reportedly labeled Jolie the “town pump”
    Denies affair with Olivier Martinez
    Caused Kylie Minogue to turn up on set during the filming of Taking Lives
    Has second nose job and is rumoured to have had several other cosmetic proceedures
    Makes Alexander
    Denies affair with Colin Farrell
    Denies affair with Val Kilmer
    Denies affair with Oliver Stone
    Starts filming MAMS – starts affair with Brad Pitt – denies affair but mentions meeting several lovers in hotel rooms for sex
    December 2005, a Cambodian charity says that Angelina Jolie owes them over $1 million in promised funding after abruptly stopping donations – Instead of giving the $1.5 million in funds to the forest conservation group she was helping, she decided to start her own agency to oversee the work without telling them first *in order to make herself the ‘head’ of the charity, PR machine goes into overdrive*
    In Jan 05 her work with the UN starts coming out on a weekly basis rather than 3x’s a year
    Explained during an interview in 2005 that being intimate with a married man is something she could not forgive herself for
    States she was only a friend to Pitt, who wants children
    Does the ‘W’ shoot with Pitt
    Just friends on the beach in Kenya in April 2005 – set up with papz pics – wild animal sounds from their room, one month after Aniston filed for divorce
    Adopts a girl from Ethiopia – Pitt accompanies his friend
    Jolie visits Pakistan (she’s pregnant but, not public)
    Starts to adopt that smug facial expression
    Dec 2005 Jolie Petitions the court to have Pitt added to her children’s last name
    January 2006, Jolie confirmed to People that she was pregnant with Pitt’s child, confirming their relationship for the first time in public
    And BINGO, her evil plan worked – using the oldest trick in the book

    http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/taking-lives-life-or-something-like-it-t218896-60.html?sid=e2c202994a0682bf3ac5af15d12c76d4

    Reply
  154. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    @ Kate – oh you’re so great with the Angelina history. Like I said, if we got together the stuff you know and all the things that have come up here we have a basis for a pretty damning book on Ange without the necessity for any further research. Its just that her PR has silenced so many aspects of her. Hope your trip is going ok x

    Reply
  155. Kate said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    U@Different Guest:
    Which is what she did, she was a druggie even then, being smart and graduating early had zero to do with it LOL

    sorry Z right now I am in between people no time but it is in a a very old interview about her in the early days before they were censored .

    Reply
  156. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    @Kate:Yeah, I thought she was into drugs much earlier than she claimed. The L.A. area alternative schools were well known back in my day for being rife with drugs. Actually, where I live now, they still are.

    Reply
  157. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    what was BBT’s “sofa” comment? This was long before I started paying attention to this.

    Reply
  158. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    @ g – that’s hilarious – particularly that Uma Thurman called her the “town pump”, is there a reference for that or was it just hearsay?

    Some of the detail I’m not sure is correct though. The way I knew it was that she had the affair with JS first on the set of Foxfire while she was still with JLM. Then I thought she went on to make Gia because she said JS was her first bitch and that she had been with a woman before doing the lesbian scenes. I don’t think she got married until after the affair with JS, she went back to JLM and married him I think. I could be wrong though, Kate will probably know for sure. And did she have an affair with Banderas? I thought the deal was that she was desperately trying to get his attention but he wasn’t interested. Plus Melanie said no way jose!

    Reply
  159. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    @Keane:
    I think that the change in her PR status from wanton wild child to Santa Angelina is a direct result of hiring Trevor Neilson. That man has really earned his keep. JMO!

    Reply
  160. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @backalleyknees:Something along the lines of screwing Angelina was like screwing a couch. So did he screw a couch for comparison?

    Reply
  161. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    She was “like fucking a couch”

    HAHAHAHA! Ah, the sex appeal of that statement always gives me the giggles!

    Reply
  162. lila said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    All I can say after watching the drug den video is that she’s an absolute blathering, incoherent idiot. Her every other word is “like” and she tries to sound smart by gesticulating and making those significant pauses (something she STILL does in interviews, while gazing lustfully into the interviewer’s eyes)… She even breaks off mid-word and jumps from incoherent thought to incoherent thought – she was clearly high on something (IMO :) )

    I just find her to be a manipulator extraordinaire who’s not too bright but makes up for it with a lot of cunning. Again, IMO. Ugh, I get all kinds of icky just thinking about her skanky a**. BLECH.

    Reply
  163. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    @lila:I agree with you, she’s always struck me as cunning rather than intelligent. The problem, of course, is when she runs up against some who is cunning & intelligent. I think that’s starting to happen.

    Reply
  164. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    HAHAHAHAHA! That’s hilarious. Made me giggle. Then why are all these people lining up to bang her? What about her exactly makes men feel so…I don’t even know? Powerful or amazing? She must pull out all the tricks. But as we can see with her dear husband Bradley, even mind blowing sex isn’t the cure all.

    Reply
  165. Keane said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    @ lila – yes that’s what I thought too pretty much. Its interesting how she just talks at the other woman about any old shit that comes into her head and just expects her to care. Its constantly “I” this, “I” that, she never once asks anyone else any questions, did you notice that? Just gives a monologue about herself which she think is really interesting. I wonder if anyone has ever told her that in conversations it is polite to ask the other person questions about them and then respond to things they ask about you. Not just tell them every banal incident of your life you are God’s gift to the drug den. I think we can all see where the Holie Narcissist began her life!

    Reply
  166. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @backalleyknees:BBT also said she gave the best blow jobs he’d ever had – perhaps that’s the appeal.

    Reply
  167. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    My theory is that her twat is like a big black hole only on earth. EVERYTHING, every man, every woman, every child, every plant, every animal…it all goes in there! Like the Garden of Eden if the Garden of Eden was painted in a Tim Burton movie! LOL!

    Reply
  168. lila said on May 14th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @Keane

    Fantastic point and something I entirely neglected to mention – she’s an egomaniacal narcissist and she’s clearly monopolizing the entire conversation, blathering about “I” this, “I” that, talking that poor woman into a stupor.. I mean, at some point, does she get hoarse or think ‘gee, maybe I should ask the other person something insightful?’.. But nooooo, St. Angelina loves herself more than anyone else in this world!

    I often think her ego even surpasses Madonna’s (GASP! Almost impossible, I know!)

    Anyhoo, Keane, just wanted to shout out to you – your eloquence and erudite commentary make my day :) Cheerio!

    Reply
  169. Patty anne said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    Collin Farrel said after making Alexander with Jolie, that she is wild in the bed, ” She will do anything!” was exactly what he said . And, didn’t one of the guest on IUCTV say last night that Brad was with Angie for the wild, kindy sex? or words to that effect? Brad is a sex addict imo, and Angie knows from experience how to fufill his every fantasy no matter what it involves. Remember, both are BI and having an OPEN relationship. Pervert’s idea of heaven! I hope they screw themselves into the ground, and Brad’s teeny weenie falls off from too much friction….

    Reply
  170. guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m5d14-Angelina-Jolie–Now-a-Pyrenees-named-Angel-causes-problems-on-film-set

    Angelina Jolie – Now, a Pyrenees named Angel causes problems on film set

    Angelina Jolie just cannot get along with dogs. This column first reported her problems with Bingo, a Golden Retriever, on the set of her upcoming film, Salt. Now, rumor has it that she is battling a very cute and sweet Pyrenees named Angel, whom Angelina reportedly refers to as “Devil.” Yesterday, Angel became so frustrated that she stole a book Angelina was reading called “The Giver.” When Angelina tried to get the book back, Angel viciously growled at her. Anybody who has ever seen a Pyrenees knows that they usually never growl.

    Angel the Pyrenees was a replacement for Bingo the Golden Retriever, another dog that is said to be very sweet, loving, and professional. “I don’t know what Angelina does to these dogs,” the source on the set tells me. “But I think dogs can sense when a human being is fake, manipulative, and doesn’t really care for animals.” The trouble with Angel reportedly started during a chase scene when Angel was supposed to jump on people trying to attack Angelina’s character, Edwin Salt. Instead, Angel jumped on Angelina, who started screaming at the top of her lungs for people to get “this thing” off of her.

    I think that Angelina Jolie should just be thrown in the middle of a dog pound for a day. This way, she will be forced to get used to dogs and not act like a dog herself. Golden Retrievers and Pyrenees are the sweetest animals anybody has ever seen. The fact that Angelina Jolie can’t get along with them says a lot more about her character than it says about the dogs.

    Reply
  171. justhelping said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    okay two things stuck out from that ff post. it said that aj met bp at a concert when she was with bbt. we kept trying to place her with him prior to this. well, this would make sense.
    also, the part about her being convinced she killed someone. just maybe this could be that woman on the set of foxfire that overdosed. jmo
    oh, good evening, well here at least everyone.

    Reply
  172. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    Dogs always know…

    Reply
  173. Different Guest said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @guest:Perhaps the producers should take note and rewrite the scene or delete it entirely. Animals do know.

    Reply
  174. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @g:
    Wow.
    Looking at that list of life accomplishments, I was amazed to discover I haven’t seen even one of her movies.

    Well, you got me up to speed. I’m thinking that I don’t know what to say. I’m just astounded that someone who has done these things has gotten this sparkling press coverage.

    It also sounds like both she and Brad have a thing about co-stars.

    And the stuff about the money and Cambodia and the little boy…..
    I’m beginning to understand some of the hostility directed toward her.
    It doesn’t sound like she has made many friends along the way.
    Never heard that quote from Uma.

    I was a bit of the mind that people do what they do—none of us are perfect. But some of that stuff sounds really sleazy to me. Just my own opinion, of course.

    It’s going to be challenging to try not to be negative with this new information.
    I don’t know if I can do it.

    Reply
  175. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    @g:
    Also….Timothy Hutton?
    Ethan Hawke?
    Colin Ferrell?
    Anyone?

    Goodness.
    And a Golden Globe win?
    Really?

    I’m just trying to take all this in.
    Don’t know how I’ve managed to miss all this great acting.
    I saw her as a bit part in one movie with Denzel Washington—she had short hair—it was a bad movie—she was awful in it (in my untutored, uneducated opinion—but it’s all I got)—and I would have never, ever imagined that that girl would ever be considered a great actress.

    Reply
  176. another lurker said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    @ Keane

    “Not just tell them every banal incident of your life you are God’s gift to the drug den.”

    QUOTE OF THE DAY! That really made me LOL

    Reply
  177. justhelping said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    i just came across this. it is a public record for a suit filed by jane p. not sure if this is anything, but it is for greene county which is springfield.
    http://pipl.com/cache/?N=10.10.93.39&S=2009051418305298200000004043783316065&P=NCS7_20361.htm
    could this be a nanny gone bad, breach of contract?

    Reply
  178. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    And how could she possibly ever trust him again?

    Reply
  179. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    @pickwick:
    Hey Pickwick…her Oscar win was for playing a sociopath – which, imo, was basically her playing herself. She plays messed up people very well, because she isn’t playing. So is that really great acting? I don’t think so. jmo.

    Reply
  180. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Okay, I’m STILL laughing about that Tim Burton line.

    Reply
  181. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    @Keane:
    That would have been great…to sue them/her for that. If possible. Kind of scary…but it seems the threat of that may have stopped them from being overt. And using your real name again.

    Reply
  182. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    @guest:
    “The Giver” is a children’s book. Well, middle school.

    The dog thing pretty much sums it up. Golden Retrievers attacking? I’ve never heard of any GP being even one to nip. They are gentle creatures. And I’m imagining a trained GP is even more so.
    What could they be reacting to? A smell, maybe? Could a dog really know if someone is bad?

    Reply
  183. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    @pickwick:
    That was a good one! Very creative….and you can just see it….in a Tim Burton way….minus AJ (in my mind…that is too gross!). What a ho. She obviously has learned how to control people w/ sex…and I wonder if part of that is letting people control her – during the act – so they have the illusion that they are in control. Whoa, would that be manipulative!!

    Reply
  184. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    @justhelping:
    I wonder what that is about and who is Kelly Jordan?

    Reply
  185. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    The sofa quote is certainly at odds with the quote from Ferrell and others.
    Drugs?
    A reaction to seeing BBT naked and grunting?

    Reply
  186. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    @pickwick:
    They must sense her evil. Really dogs are incredible perceptive.

    Reply
  187. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    @Z:
    In my mind, you probably have more insight into her than most of her conquests.
    She certainly always seems to have the ultimate control, but she seems talented at giving the guys the illusion they are in control—-making them feel like manly men probably. (imo).

    After reading all this, I’m agreeing with you.

    Reply
  188. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    @pickwick:
    She is so manipulative she probably turns the hot sex on and off at will. She was doing it for a reason, no doubt. If it’s true. Maybe she was angry with him and punishing him for something. Or he said it to hurt her? They both use to brag about what incredible sex they had together.

    Reply
  189. TobyKat said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    Here are couple of interesting links. The people link has a timeline. Her admittance to the UCLA medical center’s neuropsychiatric happened in April of 2000. She stayed there for three days after having a nervous breakdown as reported by people mag.
    http://www.people.com/people/angelina_jolie/biography
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-329682/Angelinas-disturbing-world.html

    Reply
  190. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    @pickwick:
    I agree with you, too…lol. But yeah, I think she is so manipulative…she probably makes them feel exactly what they want….or think they want to feel….like you said, the illusion they are in control – but she actually is. Scary person!! I’ve been reading about sociopaths and it sounds so much like her. Very scary. jmo.

    Reply
  191. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    @Z:
    I used a line similar to that to explain why I think that BP is examining his spirituality **cough”rehab”cough** these days. He has had the epiphany that that which he has sought to control (personal, business, media, etc.) so vigilantly has adapted to where it now controls him. Is there any escape from the monster which he has created? Not until he learns to let go…

    Reply
  192. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    @Z:
    I’m going to feel very mean for saying this, but I’m also in agreement that Tim Burton is the only director who could capture the” ding an sich” of Aj’s va-ga-ga.

    Reply
  193. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    @pickwick:
    “I’m just astounded that someone who has done these things has gotten this sparkling press coverage” I know!!! That is why I feel very negatively toward her – or one reason. She is so fake and manipulative that she has tons of people absolutely convinced that she is a saint. Puke.

    Reply
  194. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    @pickwick:
    LOL…Yes, AJ in Sweeney Todd…now there was a dark, dark film.

    Reply
  195. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:16 pm

    @pickwick:
    LOLOLOLOLOLOL!

    **wipes up Diet Coke from computer keyboard**

    Reply
  196. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Very interesting thought there!!! Wow..that would be a terrific story line…movie or book. And the scariest part is it’s probably real. That makes total sense to me. His head is probably spinning…”What happened?!?”. I wish I was a writer …I’d love to explore that thought!

    I definitely have been thinking that he thought AJ was so misunderstood and he was going to save her and being with her has just spun his life completely out of control.

    Reply
  197. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    ah for an edit button….

    Just the singing alone…12 cats in a trash can having a fight! …and they would all be wielding guns and knives, with little kitty fowns firmly in place!

    Reply
  198. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    LOL……the chaos of it all…..

    Reply
  199. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:26 pm

    @Z:
    All the rumors, the speculation of the most absurd kind…Diaper wearing…bad angie made him do stuff! Went to a woman who would bear him children…bad Jennifer for making him resort to that last resort! He is in over his head in the lifestyle he has acquired…bad Angie! Jen made him a stoner…bad Jen! and the list goes on forever! I sometimes wonder if both women are not the results of HIS manipulations. Collateral damage so to speak. Not defending AJ. (Her pretentiousness is nauseating to me personally)

    Seriously, NOTHING sticks to him. Now that is what I CALL A PR MACHINE!

    Reply
  200. Anneonymous said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    @Keane:
    If you check some of the Examiner’s stories about her and look in the comments sections, you will see a “susi” posting ferociously there. I assumed it was a Brangeloon, but based on this information, it appears that it really was Angelina Jolie under a username. She is bat shit crazy. I have also seen other usernames like “angie” and “Ms. J” and “kemi” over there. She posts over and over again, attacking the writer and other posters for spreading lies about an innocent person who we don’t even know, yada yada yada. Her typical modus operandi. In the Brad Pitt pees in his sleep story, “susi” was apparently so out of control, they had to delete some of her comments. I guess this has been going on over there with Daryl D. Then she posted under “truthie.” In the Brad Pitt doesn’t use toilet paper story, a poster named “truthfully” mocks Brad over his poor hygiene and says “he needs to leave the children out of it.” Huh? I am just enjoying the show. The whole of Hollywood must be laughing at her by now.

    Reply
  201. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    @g:
    This makes me wonder if she purposely lobbied to get the role in MAMS so she could work w/ Pitt and seduce him…did she have a plan all along?? I guess that’s what they are saying. Woman in HW must absolutely hate her.

    I saw this interview with her recently (forgot the year it came out – 2006 maybe)…she said something along the lines of: I don’t care who hates me, or who loves me as long as I get to go home to my kids at the end of the day.

    So fake and obnoxious…revolting, really.

    Reply
  202. Elle said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    @another lurker:
    I am listening to this dreadfully boring “drug den” video as I write this. And you know what I remember most about this ? 1) The irritating guy, and 2) How AJ raises her voice to speak over him and is so much more interested in talking to her friend. Does she have that silver/green hair in this vid? I know someone who knew someone who did allegedly did smack with AJ who later OD’d. I wonder if this is she? Creepy.

    Reply
  203. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    I thought he turned Jen into a stoner…but that is only the feeling I got. I actually never thought Jen was a stoner. But yeah, there is no doubt he has a PR machine.

    Which is extremely interesting, because I read an interview with him after he made Interview With the Vampire, where he and Tom Cruise were supposedly not getting along. He said as a backhanded complement about Cruise’s PR something like: He has an amazing machine, I wouldn’t want that, but he’s amazing.

    My first thought was, hmmm you wouldn’t want that and yet here you are in the midst of the biggest PR machine HW has probably ever seen. Maybe he learned a thing or two from Cruise.

    Reply
  204. Elle said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    I think shit is starting to stick to him now. And he’s starting to hit the wall (I’m being gracious) so he is smart to produce and do other things. Then again, he could be a wanna be RR is his middle to old age and make a million Oceans movies. Don’t think he has the chops for a film like Three Days of the Condor or anything else RR has done. He’s more like beefcake eye-candy than soul-stirring actor IMO. imo- lol.

    Reply
  205. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    @Z:
    Here is the quote from a Rolling Stone interview (94): “I tell you, the machine Tom runs is quite impressive,” Pitt will say a few months later when Interview has been completed. “I wouldn’t want to live like that but still…Listen, if you want to stay on top, you’ve gotta stay on top. A lot of times, Sean Penn’s movies don’t make money. And in my opinion, Sean Penn is the best we have in that age group. So you can’t sit and make Tom out to be the bad guy. Tom Cruise is good in this film.”

    Reply
  206. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    @Z:
    Oh, I can see her lobbying to get that part, especially, since BP was and is an A-Lister. This woman is extremely manipulative, as we all know, and, yeah that makes sense. She is such a ‘fake’. Remember in an interview/article, after, the whole BP & AJ – Jen said that she met Angelina right before the filming of MAMS and that AJ was just sooo ’sickenly sweet’. Yeah, AJ had an ‘agenda’.

    Reply
  207. Elle said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    @Z:
    I don’t think after all those kids and with her incredibly frail and ano looking body and all that working and globe-trotting that she is a sexy beast. Just. Don’t. She has no sexiness to her anymore. I’m not buying the hot chick shit, golden pussy whipping BP shit. She doesn’t look like she has the energy to put on that kind of performance anymore. Megan Fox? I’ll believe that (sort of – she’s definitely using AJ’s playbook to a “t” but better)

    Reply
  208. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    @Elle:
    I’ve got to agree. I think the shit is sticking, too. Maybe not the way it would with someone else…someone else probably would not have a career anymore……but notice he’s losing his looks and the shit is sticking…sad commentary, imo. There are certainly a lot of ppl that have thought he was an ass ever since he broke up with Jen in the nastiest of ways. Yeah, I wouldn’t describe him as soul-stirring either. He’s just not that great.

    Reply
  209. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    @Z:
    Hey, wasn’t there a film that Sean Penn & BP did together? I remember reading an article that they didn’t get along at all, as Sean P. was so intense and BP is more laid back. Can’t even remember what film that was. Of course, I didn’t see it, so I don’t know, just remember this article.

    Reply
  210. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Yeah…grrr. Makes me sick. And someone said (Kate I think) that she had tried for Colin Farrel who dumped her and at least one other guy to hook up with, to be the family unit….and BP is the one that fell for it.

    Reply
  211. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    @Elle:
    Well this was before…what I had been talking about….I absolutely believe she had/got him with sex when they met and probably up until recently….but very recently, don’t know. She is completely ano looking. I don’t know where she’d get the energy. But he could still be remembering. Men have said she’s do anything in bed. Fantasy come true, for some…esp. a sex addict.

    Reply
  212. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    @N’other Name:
    IDK, I don’t remember a film with the both of them…but Sean Penn could act him under a table, imo…..not crazy about Penn’s behavior…but I really believe he can act. I wonder if Pitt would actually want to act beside him…it might make him look baaaaad.

    Reply
  213. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Here ya go:

    http://www.prettyboring.com/?q=node/7576

    So this was recently…that interview where BP basically said he admires Penn was years ago.

    Reply
  214. Elle said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:27 pm

    Neither one of them are great actors!

    In addition to AJ’s powerful performance of herself, I think the reason she won the Oscar is because she is second generation and those old Academy people love that. Remember when Gwyneth in Shakespeare in Love won over Kate B. in Elizabeth? That was just so painfully obvious they wanted that second generation HW “royalty” win. Funny thing is, those second generation kids can’t act!!

    Reply
  215. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

    @Z:
    Whoa, good research! Not a ‘fave’ of Sean Penn especially in light of reports that he doesn’t want to give Robin any money. And Natalie Portman, please! But what was so totally ‘cruel’ of him, that he not only did not want to ‘kiss’ Robin after it was announced he won Best Actor – she basically had to grab his face to kiss him. And her ‘adoringly’ look at Sean when he was up there, and he didn’t even thank her. What a total jerk. So, SP & BP are basically ‘cheats’ and totally into themselves. Hey, but that’s Hollywood! Since California is a 50/50 state, hope Robin takes him to the cleaners! He certainly could have been more of a gentleman, but the same goes for BP.

    Reply
  216. BigApplette said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    @Keane:
    “God’s gift to the drug den!” LMAO!!! I totally agree with the comments. There is no conversation there, just soliloquy.

    Reply
  217. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    @Z:
    Oh, and yeah, Colin Farrell doesn’t strike me as a person who would fall for that one! He’s the kind of guy who would just ’screw’ her for awhle and then move on. But, hapless Pitt, fell for it. :)

    Reply
  218. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    Why do you think Gwenny broke up with Brad? It seemed like a big secret and I never heard.

    Reply
  219. pickwick said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    I think Sean Penn is a real piece of human garbage. I don’t think Brad Pitt is anything like Sean Penn. Penn is a rat.

    Reply
  220. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:47 pm

    @pickwick:
    At some point, I heard that she had an ‘affair’ with someone on the set of that whole Huey Lewis movie w/ Gwenny, et al. I read in some article that she felt really bad (didn’t admit an affair) about herself for about 5 years after. Never said anything alluding to an ‘affair’, but it was speculated that was the deal. Of course, she may have gotten tired of Brad, don’t know. But I know that he broke it off. There was an article years ago in which Brad was asked about Gwenny and he was told that she had said something and VF said that to him. He asked, ’so what did she say?’ I can’t remember, it was so long ago. But, after the breakup, GP, went to an island or something just to clear her head. So, that’s the rumor, she cheated on him and he found out and, therefore, broke up with her. That’s all I can remember.

    Reply
  221. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Oh, VF is Vanity Fair. Sorry for the acronym!

    Reply
  222. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Grrrr. I didn’t even see that where she had to grab his face. She deserves so much better, imo. I use to love him…but not anymore. Can’t stand a cheat!!

    Reply
  223. justhelping said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    do you know the woman’s name or any more details? that is strange. @Elle:

    Reply
  224. Leosgrl88 said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    Hello Everyone. I have been reading the messages posted on this website for only a few weeks so I’m not as knowledgeable on a lot of the things that you guys are talking about but I will say that I agree with your perception of AJ. I have been saying for the longest time that she is nothing more then an evil, conniving, lying, schizophrenic bitch. Now, as I have said that, let me also say that she is also a genius (which most schizophrenic’s are). She lead BP into believing she could give him what he THOUGHT he wanted at the time, which was “family” and once she got him hooked, she wasted no time in trapping him with kid after kid (JH’s daughter, adoption of Pax & Zahara and the surrogate twins). She knew he would wake up from her spell one day but of course, by then, it would be too late. He CAN’T go anywhere, even if he wanted too. What other woman would want the inevitable “baby momma drama” that is sure to come with AJ. By the time it’s all said and done, BP won’t have anything or anyone left in his life that he can turn too, all because of AJ. Does BP deserve any sympathy for the mess that is his life, hell no. He made his choice and now he has to deal with it for the rest of his life.

    Reply
  225. Astro said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt To Do The Cannes Cannes

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/05/13/angelina-jolie-to-do-the-cannes-cannes/

    Reply
  226. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

    @BigApplette:
    “God’s gift to the drug den!” That is hilarious!!!!!!

    Well Penn married Madonna…not the best judgement there, imo. Yuck…no offense to Guy Ritchie. But I wondered about that, too…they seemed like the strangest pair – Madonna and Guy. Between real talent (him) and fame whoring (her). And he seems way more real….just from what I’ve seen. Don’t have any real info on him. But I have always thought Madonna was just gross. I remember her on the cover of mags in the 80’s and she was so disgusting…she was greasy. Really. Yuck.

    Reply
  227. Sicily said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    I was thinking back to the first photo shoot with the twins. Jolie looked exhauted and quite rough, wearing a nightie. I remember thinking that perhaps she’d done the photoshoot a bit too soon after the birth and hadn’t given herself time to recover. With all the new revelations, I wonder whether looking that way – tired, like she was two weeks post-birth, was done on purpose.

    Reply
  228. g said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    @Keane:
    Yes, also hilarious are all the “Denies affair with ‘xyz’” and all the “Caused ‘xyz’ to turn up on set everyday during the filming of …”
    And the best “Starts to adopt that smug facial expression” LOL

    @pickwick:
    Pickwick, I don’t know much about what happened with Ethan Hawke or Tim Hutton but this is a blurb from the Mar 2004 Vogue interview.

    As now nearly everyone knows, Jolie and Farrell seem to have bonded. After filming was done, they, along with Maddox, went to Egypt for Christmas. “The three of us woke up Christmas morning and went on camels and saw the pyramids and then spent a few days just exploring Egypt and going to the desert and sleeping outside.” Perhaps it’s more than just friendship, but, she says, “the press leaves no room for the idea that you would consider one day maybe dating. There’s no room for that. We both wanted to see Alexandria and Egypt. He’s wonderful. He’s a great guy.”
    You’re cut from the same cloth, I say.
    “Yeah, we’re similar, but, like me, he’s not out to get anybody. He’s quite open and nice.”
    Naturally, the trip to Egypt wasn’t just a pleasure cruise. Jolie took Farrell along with her when she went to a Sudanese refugee camp in Cairo, bringing winter clothes and toys, and donated $20,000 to help build a community health center.

    Reply
  229. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @Elle:
    “she is second generation and those old Academy people love that.” Good point there. As in too many things politics can overcome logic.

    Reply
  230. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    @Elle:
    I thought Penn was great in Dead Man Walking…but who knows, maybe he was playing himself, too. Didn’t see Milk.

    Reply
  231. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    @g:
    ““Caused ‘xyz’ to turn up on set everyday during the filming of …”” lol….if I was xyz I’d be on that set, too!!!

    Reply
  232. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    @g:
    I agree…this is hilarious!!: And the best “Starts to adopt that smug facial expression” LOL

    “Yeah, we’re similar, but, like me, he’s not out to get anybody. He’s quite open and nice.” Wow….she’s either deluded or…..lying.

    Reply
  233. Beware! said on May 14th, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    @Keane:
    Holy shit! that “all seeing eye” comment almost made me jump out of my chair! Angie is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations…CFR. If you do not know the history, please do so. I don’t believe that is an idle threat.

    Reply
  234. g said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    Back up to Ian’s post – Didn’t read all the responses yet so sorry if I’m posting what’s already been said.

    “They sat him down and basically told him she’s trouble and no good,”
    So it took them this long to figure this out. Where were they 4 years ago. He didn’t listen to them then, what makes them think he’ll listen now. (all my bitches are mad at me – or something like that). The man is 45 years old and his parents have to point this out to him?????

    “Jane would like nothing more than for Brad and Jen to reunite,” the source said.
    Sure Jane would like this but what do Brad and Jen want. As many have said here in previous posts, seems like there’s just too much water under the bridge. Also, Jen (or any woman) would have to be nuts to take on any role that involved dealing with AJ. As much as I would like to see those kids in a stable environment, I wouldn’t wish this on Jen in a million years.
    All JMO

    Reply
  235. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    @Z:
    On a different note, think of this! BP has only been on the SALT set once during filming and apparently it was brief. Maybe he is hoping against hope she will latch on to some other vermin! LOL!

    In seriousness, I think it was on Oprah, I remember Jennifer Aniston was asked why she wasn’t on the Mr and Mrs Myth set and she said rather plaintively. I didn’t go because “I trusted my husband” Probably a little paraphrased. Very sad. And very telling IMO.

    Reply
  236. stinky-inky said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    @guest:
    Best. Story. Ever.
    I love this.

    Reply
  237. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Whoa! Excellent point! And sad about Jen…and telling. Man. Grrrr. BP is dirt.

    Reply
  238. omgwtflol said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    @Keane:

    Actually, in the U.S. the plaintiff has burden of proof. So if Brangelina sued, they’d have to prove Ian is a liar. That’s difficult and not difficult. How do you prove you never licked a dog’s balls? Impossible to prove objectively. You take the stand and deny it of course. The defense would then need to show how they know what they claim. By default, the defendent ends up in the hot seat.

    The real threat to celebs is depositions and the discovery process. Ian could say that Angie has the ability to fly and is married to a unicorn. He could never prove that so it would seem a no-brainer for a celeb to sue, but during the depo and discovery process, her life becomes an open book. no celeb wants that kind of exposure.

    Not to mention, the minute they sued, this story blows up huge. Regardless of the outcome, the public will remember the scandal.

    One last point: it isn’t enough to sue because someone was mean or untruthful. You have to prove damages. This is a civil matter after all, not criminal. The plaintiff as I said has burden of proof. Brangelina would have to show that this site harmed them financially or in some tangible way (e.g. blocked an adoption). Celebs can argue that their rep is their livelihood, so that’s something, but weak.

    Reply
  239. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    Hey you guys! This off topic here, but tomorrow night is a special on Farrah Fawcett’s struggle with cancer and, we all know, she is on her deathbed. Never was a total fan of her, but I do greatly admire what message she was trying to send to all families that are going through cancer either w/ their parents, siblings, themselves or their friends. This was a good thing (and her final) to do to inspire or maybe help those going through this now or in the past, with their family or friends. I, myself, would have a hard time being filmed at my absolute worst and, kudo’s to her. Whether we liked her or not throughout the years, she is doing something great for others facing this horrible disease. This was totally brave of her and, so sad, she is not long for this world. Sad, but beautiful that she gave back in the end. Just a reminder to those who may be able to see this. XO

    Reply
  240. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    @g:
    “all my bitches are mad at me” ggggrrrrr, also a shitty, arrogant thing to say. And he is suppose to be charming? Yeah, I would not want to be entwined with Jolie. Jen deserves better….and unless he really gets that sex addiction treated, once a cheater always a cheater. How could she ever trust him?

    Reply
  241. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    Oh, just heard this on ‘SHOWBIZ TONIGHT’, Brad & Angelina will be in Cannes together. Not too much of a surprise, ’cause they will milk their publicity machine as much as possible. Of course, we will just have to wait and see. Just an FYI!

    Reply
  242. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    @stinky-inky:
    Someone (I think P) suggested that now she is making it look like she hates dogs…..good idea to combat to pitt-bull story. But it sounds like dogs hate her, too.

    @omgwtflol:
    Oh, makes sense. I’m not a lawyer (obviously…lol)…but read a lot of books about trials. So I should have figured this out – but didn’t…thanks for the post! It would be hard to prove damages. And not INTouch (and other sites) are printing stuff, too

    Reply
  243. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Especially if it’s breaking down…they need to get as many appearances as possible in before they are kaput. I’m so cynical….but wouldn’t put it past them. Someone said the twins are a commodity and the less they are shown, the more they are worth…I think it was on IUCTV…anyway, they are going to have to make more money on the twins before it’s over, I would think…..since that’s the way they are. jmo.

    Reply
  244. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:38 pm

    @Z:
    Oh, yeah! Remember that whole ‘Octomon’ lawsuit that Gloria Allred want’s those kids have those publicity shots allocated to the children not Octomom (because they are the ones getting the publicity and Octomom is benefiting from her kids publicity?0 I just get mad about this because ‘Brangie’ is definitely getting so much publicity, not because of their talents but, because of their children. Ok, it’s a different situation, because I’m sure that they will ‘inherit’ tons of money when BP & AJ die. But, really, do we even know what their ‘foundation’ is all about? I don’t think anyone has really monitored that, because where did this money go to?? No one seems to have an answer to that. Brad and Angelina are just exploiting their kids – they will get away with it though.

    Reply
  245. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    @N’other Name:
    and then AJ spouted that BS about how she’d never met BP and had only heard things about him and wasn’t interested in him. She made it sound as though she thought he was another HW pretty boy idiot and that she basically she didn’t take him seriously as a human being until she found out that they had a “deep connection” or some crap over helping the world. That’s when all the humanitarian stuff really got dragged front and center. That by them being together they would make the world a better place. That’s how she tried to sell it for awhile. She made it obvious she thought he was wasting his life and time with Jem because she wasn’t holding fly covered children in Pakistan. And then BP’s whole comment about how his life was a “dead end” with Jen. What a f*cker. Guess that dead end wasn’t do dead huh Bradley? JMO.

    Reply
  246. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    sorry, that was to go with the post of BBT, AJ, and BP all sitting at the same concert before MAMS

    Reply
  247. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    @N’other Name:
    I wonder if Patrick Swayze will do this….I think it would be hard. I wonder how she feels about dying…I know that sounds silly. But some people come to a place where they are OK with it and brave. Incredible to watch that kind of bravery.

    @N’other Name:
    So true….there was some info up here….their taxes from 2007 or 2008 – did you see that? And there was some small amount given out so far…and not much in the fund, compared to what they said they were putting in there? They supposedly got 14 mil for the shots of the twins (unless they got half that – which was speculation)…but there is the money for the Shiloh pics, too…..so where is the money? Gosh they are full of it.

    Reply
  248. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    They really are full of it. And notice how much charity stuff they are NOT doing now?? It is a sad joke. AJ has had her pic in a couple of places…so obviously a set up. Really makes me sick. And how interesting she steps up the pics of her with orphans when she is trying to snag Brad.

    Reply
  249. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    Yeah, can you imagine?? Right, the WORLD has been such a ‘better’ place since those two got together. Barf!!! Course, the movies won’t stop (as Angie has said soo many times) and the time they spend with their kids is nominal. Idiots.

    Reply
  250. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    @Z:
    Re Patrick Swayze, saw in he grocery line today and he was on the cover, apparently one of his lungs was removed? Wow, that was a hard picture to look at. He may just want to do this privately. To each his own. Man, that was tough to look at.

    Second point – who the ‘heck’ knows what’s going on with that money funneling? And will they EVER get called on this if this wasn’t on the up & up?? Makes me sick if this is what they are doing. I mean, really, don’t they have ENOUGH money to feed a 3rd world country??? Wow!

    Reply
  251. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @topbrit:
    Breastfeeding: Mine got enormous….uncomfortably so. But about that pic on the cover of W…has anybody noticed that the babies hand is on her right side (as you face the mag) and she is looking down – so lovingly – at the left side. So she is lovingly looking at the babies feet. Farce.

    Interesting…I’m trying to find the photo of her looking down…not the cover and can’t find it. Not up on W, it seems.

    This is interesting….Brad’s parents upset about the breastfeeding shots…“Brad’s mom feels they’re using their children as a marketing campaign tool and thinks it’s unacceptable.”

    http://silverscorpio.com/brad-pitt%E2%80%99s-parents-upset-with-angelina-jolie%E2%80%99s-breast-feeding-photos/

    That top pic doesn’t look like she’s really breast feeding either…wtf???

    Reply
  252. justhelping said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    i just read the star article about aj’s lies and it stated that she slept with 2 older men when she was younger. one was just a friend of mb’s that was her age and the other was mb’s bf.

    Reply
  253. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    along the lines of Colin Ferrel…I only saw the beginning part of Alexander (b/c it royally sucked) and remember how innapropriate she as his mother was acting towards him in the movie. I know she was ‘acting’, but that whole, let me seduce you with my eyes bs was huge in her part. I got the idea she was trying to seduce her son. If she somehow takes on the rolls she plays and doesn’t let them go (like the drugs and lesbianism in Gia {thanks G}) I could…actually I don’t want to say that because it is just sick, but you might get the idea where I was going with it. JMO.

    Reply
  254. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    @Z:
    That’s funny, ’cause if you look at Salma Hayaks (sp) boobs, OMG, THEY ARE BEYOND HUGE!! Now that woman is breastfeeding, no doubt. But should Angie boobs be even more full at the top?? I’m not talking about the nipple feeding (if that really is going on, doubtfully). But breasts full of milk just ‘explode’ everywhere!! Good call on that one! The phony stuff just never seems to stop!

    Reply
  255. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:34 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    Oh, in Gia, she was good!! ‘Cause she didn’t even have to act. She knew the deal. I saw that scene in which she was ‘withdrawing’ from heroin. Oh, yeah, that was ‘real’ (and trust me, I’ve seen that sh*t before) and it was good, because AJ was there before and she knew what the withdrawal thing was all about. However, I think Gia was in real life a better person than AJ. Gia was just mixed up but did not get into the ‘evil’ that AJ is into. However, I thought that was AJ’s best acting role, ’cause she embodied that role. Gia is much more a sympathetic being, poor thing. May she rest in peace.

    Reply
  256. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    @N’other Name:
    Exactly. Idiots.

    @backalleyknees:
    It once again seems like she is giving the message that she thinks incest is OK. Which is a message she has given over the years. jmo.

    @N’other Name:
    Exactly…..if she was really feeding in that shot they would be mush bigger at the top. And in the W shots they don’t look big…at all.

    Reply
  257. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    A while back I was looking into the charities and how they operate. I believe that the Jolie-Pitts have more than one charitable foundation. They have the sanctuary in Cambodia which there were changes made to that to put AJ in charge of it. From my memory, the funding was never completed, short by a million or so and Cambodia wanted the cash. It was originally funded with 5m that Jolie promised at the adoption of Maddox. She seems to have done something in Africa under the name of Zahara also. A hospital or something along those lines. (greasing the palms of the natives in order to get otherwise unattainable children for adoption?)

    If memory serves me correctly, despite whatever funds are put in only 3% or 3.5% p/yr needs to be handed out to the cause at hand. As operational expenses, they could in effect write off travel, bodyguards, percentages of rented/owned mansions, etc. during their promotion of said charity. All charities should be researched to see how much of the monies given are actually going to the cause. Some of the most popular charities have operational expenses upward of well over 50%-80%. This means as little as .20 cents on the dollar actually goes to where it wil l do the most good.

    The world is so much better with Jolie looking out for all our general well-beings…I have NEVAH felt so secure and able to sleep at night as I have for the last four years! LOL!

    Sorry to ramble…

    Reply
  258. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Hey, you’re not rambling. Everything that you said makes sense. Wow, .20 cents on the dollar??? WTF?!!

    Reply
  259. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    @Z:
    much….not mush…lol

    Here are some of the pics…the one w/ her looking down is small…but the babies hand (and therefore head) is on the wrong side.

    http://www.hollywoodbubble.com/2008/10/angelina-jolies-uncensored-breast-feeding-photos-w-magazine/

    @DebFrmHell:
    Thanks, Deb…interesting. So I wonder if their “expenses” are more than what they give out. Would the IRS bust them?

    Reply
  260. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    @N’other Name:
    I think that was her best movie as well. That movie made me fall in love with AJ. She did a very human portrait of Gia and I loved her for it. ITA that they are very different people. And the promo shot of her looking down her nose while walking the catwalk was HOT!! But so many years later, I’ve come to recognize that face over and over and it has lost its appeal. Wearing black and seducing with her eyes are her strongest points in life. Its funny. I really like AJ back in the day. Yeah she was batshitinsane, but at least she owned it and there weren’t kids involved. And then she got Maddox and my first reaction was WTF is she doing with a child?

    Reply
  261. backalleyknees said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    Have a great night guys! Sleep well!

    Reply
  262. DebFrmHell said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    @Z:
    I am certain that they are set up to totally pay IRS and paying their tax bills accordingly. Every other watchdog group may fall by the wayside but with IRS…they are fearless and could careless as long as they are getting their due!

    The only time I have known IRS to backdown from a high profile case is…you guessed it Co$!!!!!! Scientology won that game of chicken.

    Reply
  263. N'other Name said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    @backalleyknees:
    Yep, I agree with you. I just LOVED AJ in that movie and then I became a fan. However, WOW, do things change. I think ‘batshitinsane’ is ok, but once she became this totally fake ‘humanitarian’ just to UP her image, then I just couldn’t stand her. Especially, since she was on a mission to take a ‘husband’ away from his ‘wife’. Now, he is just as much to blame as she on that one. YUCK!!!! I feel sorry for his parents. They are probably wondering, ‘what could we have done differently?’ Nothing! Wow, I really hope they don’t believe that in any way they were at fault for his upbringing. That was his choice and his only.

    Reply
  264. Z said on May 14th, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Whoa! That is interesting, too…about Co$!! Hmmmmm….geez. So many crooks.

    Reply
  265. N'other Name said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:00 am

    @Z:
    Z, you’re funny. Never even caught ‘mush’ not ‘much’! That kinda cracks me up! Don’t analyze your spelling so much, we ALL do the same, and I think we all get the ‘gist’ of all our posts. Still makes me laugh, tho (or should I say though) Smiling right now! :)

    Reply
  266. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:01 am

    @N’other Name:
    Yeah, I think fame twisted him…and addiction…..and now he’s a pretzel.

    @backalleyknees:
    As soon as kids were involved…bad news. And how they use them…just so awful. Night, BAK!

    Reply
  267. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:02 am

    @N’other Name:
    LOL…the mush was funny…lol but yeah, sometimes I just let the typos go…..other times, no. I use to worry so much years ago…proof read everything. I’m still that way a bit…but get lazy.

    Reply
  268. DebFrmHell said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:05 am

    The whole thing is one self feeding machine. If there is no one to capture the imagination of the public, the media manipulators create one. Bennifer didn’t make it. Brangelina has. And continuing the fraud for as long as possible generates multimillions of dollars which feeds the film industry by putting fans in their seats.

    Reply
  269. N'other Name said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:10 am

    @Z:
    Let the typo’s go. We’re not at work here and I think we are all ’smart’ enough to ‘get’ it. If some are not, maybe should be on this site. We just type to respond asap to keep discussing. Of course, I would proofread EVERYTHING before I sent something to Executive Management. But this site is just soo much fun and we don’t care about spelling errors. We get it! XO :)

    Reply
  270. Jaguar said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:13 am

    @backalleyknees:

    You hit the nail on the head with the statement “Yeah she was batshitinsane, but at least she owned it and there weren’t kids involved.”

    That’s the gist of my disdain for her, that she’s a crazy fcuk but wants this Saint Mother Theresa Holy Family rep. I never have thought she was a good actress but at least back when she owned her craziness she was REAL. And I feel sorry for all these kids she is involving in her bizarre lifestyle and continuous lying, what a mess.

    Reply
  271. N'other Name said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:14 am

    @N’other Name:
    Ok, I meant ‘maybe they ‘SHOULDN’T’ be on this site. OMG, Z, you created a monster!! Giggling my but off. Let it go (to me that is)!!! Arrggghhh!! XO

    Reply
  272. Elle said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:18 am

    Here is a link to the BBT couch comment:

    http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/showbiz/article-19354891-details/Billie+Bob+knocks+sex+with+Jolie/article.do

    Reply
  273. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:18 am

    @DebFrmHell:
    Yep….all the snowed fans. I don’t think I’ve purposely watched a Jolie movie…ever…I think…and Pitt…I don’t like watching his anymore because of all this and his treatment of Jen. I saw Burn After Reading because it’s a Coen brothers film…usually really like their stuff. But I’m sure Brange is selling tickets to someone….AJ to teenage boys, no doubt.

    @N’other Name:
    Good point, Hon!! This is not work. Yeah! And you are right, it is fun!! I love this site.

    Reply
  274. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:19 am

    @N’other Name:
    LOL….cracking up…but you know, I got it before your correction, so you are right! We can let it go.

    Reply
  275. Jaguar said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:22 am

    @Z:

    Malkovich owned Burn After Reading, he was hysterical!

    Reply
  276. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:25 am

    @Elle:
    “She has boasted about her love of lesbian sex and said the man who meets her sadomasochistic needs will be ‘the one’.” Wow. I never heard that quote before. But shouldn’t be surprised. More of the fuel that roasts the fake front of Saint Scrangie. (meaning the S & M, not lesbian part).

    Reply
  277. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:26 am

    @Jaguar:
    He was great in that! Great! Clooney kinda bugged me…and I like him in some things..but it may have been his character – very annoying.

    Reply
  278. N'other Name said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:33 am

    @Jaguar:
    Ya’ know what?? I couln’t even be bothered to see that movie because of BP. LOVE Malkovich, Coen Brothers, etc. But could not ‘rev’ myself up to see this ’cause of BP. I even wouldn’t watch TCCOBB. I don’t know, it kinda makes my skin crawl to watch these movies. Although, I LOVED the guy before this whole AJ thing and what a douche he’s been. Although, they maybe very, very good movies. Maybe, someday, but not right now. Hmm.

    Reply
  279. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:43 am

    @N’other Name:
    I hesitated for a long time because he was in it….rented it recently….I know and I haven’t been able to see TCCOBB either. Even though I love Cate Blanchett. Yeah, he became such an ass…..maybe he was just showing his true colors, don’t know. I believe that his addiction has been getting worse (booze/sex) and he couldn’t give up the sex w/ AJ.

    Reply
  280. N'other Name said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:50 am

    @Z:
    I agree. There’s something in me that cannot bring myself to see those movies. I remember watching the ‘promos’ re the Coen bros’ movie, and he was supposed to act like an ‘idiot’ as far as the character, and as much as I just LOVE Malcovich (sp), I couldn’t do it. Love Cate Blanchett too, but once again, couldn’t do it. But I did LOVE BP in ‘The River Flows Through It” – is that the right title?, the Robert Redford movie, and, also Legends of the Fall, etc. But, now, not even interested. Oh well, that is his problem and I’m sure that Hollywood insiders think this whole Brangie thing is laughable. His poor parents, tho!

    Reply
  281. Jaguar said on May 15th, 2009 at 12:51 am

    I’ll probably rent TCCOBB because I like Blanchett, and to see what all the hype is about. I did rent Changeling, the first Jolie movie I’ve seen in ages, for the same reason. Even being objective I thought her “acting” was absolutely not Academy Award nomination-worthy. At all.

    Reply
  282. N'other Name said on May 15th, 2009 at 1:02 am

    @Jaguar:
    You’re right. The only reason I saw the Changeling was that I went to a friends house and he rented 3 movies, one of them being the Changeling. Didn’t say that I did NOT want to see it, so we did, and I agree, this was not Acadamy Award nomination worth, AT ALL!!

    Reply
  283. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 1:10 am

    @N’other Name:
    I didn’t see ‘The River Flows Through It” …but liked “Legends”…even though he was a jerk in that, too. Yeah, I feel bad for his parents, too. They probably are wondering what they did wrong…sad. He should grow the f up.

    @Jaguar:
    I’ll probably see it eventually….Cate Blanchett is so wonderful…and she seems like a real person…and kind. I would be heartbroken if I heard crap about her (as heartbroken as you can be about someone you don’t know). But she seems really cool and has a great family….a good example of a famous person keeping her life private. That is interesting about Changeling….I was wondering how AJ’s acting was in that….I kept seeing the scene where she is being forced down the hall in the mental institute…that looked pretty dumb, imo. But I usually like Eastwood’s films. Lost respect after that “the most beautiful face” comment tho.

    Reply
  284. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 1:14 am

    I better go to sleep…up too late again! lol Night, guys.

    Reply
  285. John said on May 15th, 2009 at 5:46 am

    *************************BREAKING****************************************

    CANNES expects BRAD PITT– most likely WITHOUT JOLIE
    May 15, 2009

    The actor is due to promote Quentin Tarantino’s film amid rumours about his troubled relationship
    By Sophie TaylorFIRST POSTED MAY 15, 2009It’s not the starriest Cannes film festival – the economic downturn has put paid to many of the normal parties, including the annual Vanity Fair bash – but organisers had been confident that the festival would be graced by ‘Brangelina’ – the near-regal Hollywood couple, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    Pitt is still expected – to promote the Quentin Tarantino WWII bloodfest Inglourious Basterds which premieres next Wednesday – but whether ‘Angie’ will now accompany him is the subject of considerable gossip.

    The celebrity rags are filled with stories that the couple’s relationship is on the rocks. According to Now magazine, Pitt, 45, is so unhappy with Jolie that he has been begging his former wife, the Friends actress Jennifer Aniston, to take him back.

    The magazine reports clandestine meetings in a New York hotel and boozy heart-to-hearts with Aniston about his troubled life with Jolie and their household of mainly adopted children. (Two are natural twins, with whom Jolie was heavily pregnant the last time she came to Cannes.)

    Aniston is reported to have told a friend that she bore no grudge against Pitt for having walked out on her five years ago when he fell in love with Jolie on the set of Mr and Mrs Smith. Aniston apparently said she would welcome him back into his life – “as long as she didn’t have to be friends with Angelina. He agreed.”

    Jolie has another excuse not to appear in Cannes: she is currently filming on location in Albany, upstate New York, playing a CIA officer accused of being a Russian spy in Philip Noyce’s thriller Salt. Reports from the set describe her looking tearful, while a friend says: “Angie has been in some pretty dark places in her life, and now it’s as bad as it’s ever been.”

    Meanwhile, Pitt’s mother is apparently urging him to dump Jolie and get back with Aniston, who clearly makes a much more acceptable daughter-in-law. Jane Pitt is said to feel Jolie is “no good”. But no one ever said the stunning Jolie was a girls’ girl.

    Reply
  286. John said on May 15th, 2009 at 5:48 am

    *************************BREAKING****************************************

    CANNES expects BRAD PITT– most likely WITHOUT JOLIE
    May 15, 2009

    *********BREAKING NEWS*************************

    The actor is due to promote Quentin Tarantino’s film amid rumours about his troubled relationship

    By Sophie Taylor
    FIRST POSTED MAY 15, 2009I

    t’s not the starriest Cannes film festival – the economic downturn has put paid to many of the normal parties, including the annual Vanity Fair bash – but organisers had been confident that the festival would be graced by ‘Brangelina’ – the near-regal Hollywood couple, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    Pitt is still expected – to promote the Quentin Tarantino WWII bloodfest Inglourious Basterds which premieres next Wednesday – but whether ‘Angie’ will now accompany him is the subject of considerable gossip.

    The celebrity rags are filled with stories that the couple’s relationship is on the rocks. According to Now magazine, Pitt, 45, is so unhappy with Jolie that he has been begging his former wife, the Friends actress Jennifer Aniston, to take him back.

    The magazine reports clandestine meetings in a New York hotel and boozy heart-to-hearts with Aniston about his troubled life with Jolie and their household of mainly adopted children. (Two are natural twins, with whom Jolie was heavily pregnant the last time she came to Cannes.)

    Aniston is reported to have told a friend that she bore no grudge against Pitt for having walked out on her five years ago when he fell in love with Jolie on the set of Mr and Mrs Smith. Aniston apparently said she would welcome him back into his life – “as long as she didn’t have to be friends with Angelina. He agreed.”

    Jolie has another excuse not to appear in Cannes: she is currently filming on location in Albany, upstate New York, playing a CIA officer accused of being a Russian spy in Philip Noyce’s thriller Salt. Reports from the set describe her looking tearful, while a friend says: “Angie has been in some pretty dark places in her life, and now it’s as bad as it’s ever been.”

    Meanwhile, Pitt’s mother is apparently urging him to dump Jolie and get back with Aniston, who clearly makes a much more acceptable daughter-in-law. Jane Pitt is said to feel Jolie is “no good”. But no one ever said the stunning Jolie was a girls’ girl.

    Reply
  287. John said on May 15th, 2009 at 5:50 am

    *************************BREAKING****************************************

    CANNES expects BRAD PITT– most likely WITHOUT JOLIE
    May 15, 2009

    *********BREAKING NEWS*************************

    The actor is due to promote Quentin Tarantino’s film amid rumours about his troubled relationship

    By Sophie Taylor
    FIRST POSTED MAY 15, 2009I

    t’s not the starriest Cannes film festival – the economic downturn has put paid to many of the normal parties, including the annual Vanity Fair bash – but organisers had been confident that the festival would be graced by ‘Brangelina’ – the near-regal Hollywood couple, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    Pitt is still expected – to promote the Quentin Tarantino WWII bloodfest Inglourious Basterds which premieres next Wednesday – but whether ‘Angie’ will now accompany him is the subject of considerable gossip.

    The celebrity rags are filled with stories that the couple’s relationship is on the rocks. According to Now magazine, Pitt, 45, is so unhappy with Jolie that he has been begging his former wife, the Friends actress Jennifer Aniston, to take him back.

    The magazine reports clandestine meetings in a New York hotel and boozy heart-to-hearts with Aniston about his troubled life with Jolie and their household of mainly adopted children. (Two are natural twins, with whom Jolie was heavily pregnant the last time she came to Cannes.)

    Aniston is reported to have told a friend that she bore no grudge against Pitt for having walked out on her five years ago when he fell in love with Jolie on the set of Mr and Mrs Smith. Aniston apparently said she would welcome him back into his life – “as long as she didn’t have to be friends with Angelina. He agreed.”

    Jolie has another excuse not to appear in Cannes: she is currently filming on location in Albany, upstate New York, playing a CIA officer accused of being a Russian spy in Philip Noyce’s thriller Salt. Reports from the set describe her looking tearful, while a friend says: “Angie has been in some pretty dark places in her life, and now it’s as bad as it’s ever been.”

    Meanwhile, Pitt’s mother is apparently urging him to dump Jolie and get back with Aniston, who clearly makes a much more acceptable daughter-in-law. Jane Pitt is said to feel Jolie is “no good”. But no one ever said the stunning Jolie was a girls’ girl.

    http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/47622,news,cannes-expects-brad-pitt-most-likely-without-jolie

    Reply
  288. guest said on May 15th, 2009 at 6:03 am

    @pickwick:
    “What could they be reacting to? A smell, maybe? Could a dog really know if someone is bad?”

    Dogs are good judges of people. They either smell it or feel the negative aura.
    And we all know the “oops, I killed another pet” stories that jolie seems to find so amusing.

    Reply
  289. Keane said on May 15th, 2009 at 8:53 am

    @ beware! – don’t worry my friend, the CFR does not scare me, I don’t think they’re going to get involved with defending Angelina Jolie from someone who is commenting on a gossip site. And she tried that trick anyway, posting under “The Illuminati” and pretending to be someone from the CFR saying how dare you criticise our fellow member of the CFR Angelina Jolie, we have ground-pentrating sensors to spy on you from helicopters which aren’t detectable by radar, we are following your every move. I was like oh right so you must be spying on me going to Sainsburys and visiting the dentist then, how exciting! So, don’t worry, no I don’t think Angelina Jolie is using the CFR to spy on me, as much as she would love for us to all to be skeered of her and all that. The UK is also a free country, she may get away with exploiting the political sphere to her advantage in the US but that won’t work for her here. I “know my rights” Miss Angelian Jolie, you’ve contravened them once, do it again and you’ll be up shit creek without a paddle. And next time you send your helicopters with their ground-penetrating radar over, will you please tell them to keep the noise down, those propellers drive me crazy. Cheers bitch!

    Reply
  290. Vittorio said on May 15th, 2009 at 9:07 am

    @Keane:
    Hi keane. I have a quick question. The UN Goodwill Ambassdorships don’t carry diplomatic immunity, right?

    Reply
  291. BEWARE said on May 15th, 2009 at 9:53 am

    @Keane:
    Keane, are you losing the plot? I posted that WEEKS ago & you are bringing it up now in an unrelated thread without being provoked? At the end are you accusing me of being Angelina or just adding that in as an after thought -that she may be reading this? Do you post on FF??? I was reading there today & I swear their ‘lead’ poster writes EXACTLY like you. She also argues the same as you to any person who doesn’t AGREE with her, if it’s not you then I have found your true cyber twin- maybe you should go there & get acquainted! I so want to see you meltdown in person if none of this undercover stuff turns out true, it would truly be classic- have a lovely hate filled day x

    Reply
  292. BEWARE said on May 15th, 2009 at 9:56 am

    @Keane:
    Also what thread might I see this post from the Illuminati? I’d love to have a read & what is CFR??

    Reply
  293. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    @Vittorio:
    I was wondering that!! I I use to live in DC and knew diplomats carried immunity…people would complain about how their kids were terrible drivers, would get in accidents – cause them – -but nothing would happen. It never happened to me. But it was a big rumor. I don’t think an American goodwill Ambassador has immunity…maybe foreign Ambassadors?

    @John:
    This is the question of the week, huh?

    Reply
  294. backalleyknees said on May 15th, 2009 at 11:08 am

    @Keane:
    Bwahahahahaha! Cheers for the laugh!

    Reply
  295. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    @DebFrmHell:
    I just saw this…Congratulations, Deb!! I mean it…kicking addictions is a big deal! I was saying exactly this on another post about BP…he needs serious help…not a spiritual counselor – or whatever it is he is doing. Addiction is an extremely hard thing to break and he needs to work hard. I hope he gets it – understands that. And again, exactly like you said, this is with him for life now. He has to quit and not start up again…I’ve heard that addiction to substances progresses even when you are not using. About the sex…..that kind of addiction can wreck a persons life, too…and maybe he is seeing that now. It’s extremely hard to get that kind of ingrained behavior healed. It’s not to be taken lightly, imo.

    Reply
  296. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 11:41 am

    @Keane:
    Just want to say that if these two Beware (Beware! and BEWARE) people are the same person, she(?) is extremely suspect. The one way above brings up the CFR and then the one further down says “what is CFR?”…….BEWARE says “I posted that WEEKS ago”….which sounds like it was about The Illuminati post….and then they say, where is the thread, I’d love to read it….when it sounds like they just admitted to writing it. Highly suspect!

    Reply
  297. Beware! said on May 15th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @Keane:
    Actually, I wrote the first Beware! Glad to see Keane, that you do not fear! You are awesome!!

    Reply
  298. Z said on May 15th, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    @Beware!:
    So there are, two! That clears up the first part of what I wrote. : )

    Reply
  299. Keane said on May 16th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @ BEWARE – Ha ha ha, you really gave yourself away there didn’t you?! Oopsie, someone just got caught out, ha ha ha! No you fool, I was responding to a post above but you are clearly monitoring everything I say and have been for weeks! I most certainly wasn’t wasting time responding to a post from weeks ago, and yet you assumed it was directed at you, fucking hilarious! Sweetheart, I was responding to Beware! not you, and the last part was directed specifically towards my good buddy Angelina Jolie, why on earth would you think it was directed at you? I haven’t got the first clue who you are! Oh dear, I think you may have tripped yourself up there dear, haha! And no sweetheart I don’t post on FF, and there’s no need to show me my cyber twin when you’ve already decided to create one for me! (Yes I do know its you doing it, you make it obvious from the first post, and always some extremely connected insider who can give us ths scoop before Ian too, how fortunate!). Sorry to disappoint but I am having a lovely cheer-filled day as always, and plan to have a lovely week-end. If you want to see some hate why don’t you check out the twisted, evil shit that Madame Jolie poisons the world with against anyone who threatens her, Jennifer Aniston for instance? Details are on the other thread. Much love to you too ho-bag, see you in hell mwah mwah, smooches x x x x

    @ Beware! – not sure where The Illuminati post was, it was weeks ago and at the bottom of a thread. I think The Illuminati was from that conspiracy theory novel The Da Vinci Code. Wow, how scary (eyeroll). This woman genuinely does think people are stupid, but unfortunately she is too dumb to realise that the only stupid person around here is her.

    Reply
  300. John said on May 16th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    I think Brad has second thoughts. Jennifer supported or turned a blind eye to his Bromance with George Clooney. Ang doesn’t like it. I wouldn’t be susrprised to see him return to Jen. Ang can be a scary person.

    Reply
  301. tara said on May 16th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @Keane:
    to everyone that made a negative comment about angelina jolie: she’s smart, beautiful, rich, and famous
    does any of those adjectives describe anyone posting on the above article? let me answer my own question: NO! get a life and deal with your own personal mess. how can you comment on someone you’ve never met or conversated with? futhermore, the owner of this site, says, “a source close to brad”….. yeah, right. same thing enquirer, usweekly, and the rest of the tabloids state, in order to get you to buy them, and this site is no different. brad and angie are happy and jane is happy for them. look at the pic above. did anyone force jane to spend time with the kids of a woman that she thinks is trouble? but i get it, you guys are bored and talking about celebrities makes your day, just as the owner of this unheard of site. i got here by clinking a link on aol: hadn’t ever heard of it before. keep adding dumb comments about someone you wish you could be while brad and angelina continue to enjoy life with their children and the support of his parents, spending their big paychecks, while you struggle to pay the internet fee to comment on them. everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but remember that your opinion doesn’t matter. have a good miserable life worrying and wasting time commenting on people you don’t know.

    Reply
  302. whatever said on May 16th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    You guys are seriously sick for putting all of this time into watching other people. get a job or a hobby and stop being so weird about people you don’t know who don’t effect you in any way.

    Reply
  303. Lin said on May 16th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    I just got done “shoveling” my way through most of these asinine posts…what a bunch of garbage. Especially by the posters who say that they KNOW it was Angelina posting at different times and under different names. NONE of you know what is going on with Angelina and Brad, although you all sound likd idiot know-it-alls! Everyone who has SEEN the two of them together, around Manhattan, etc., has said they are happy, but you all have decided the gossipy, lying, anything-to-sell, rag magazines are telling the truth. The story about Brad’s mother wanting him to dump Jolie has been going around for years, as has the story that he is going back to boring Aniton. The only people who know are Brad and Angelina themselves, because most certainly NONE of you know. anything except how to spread malicious gossip, rumors, and outright lies! Shame on the lot of you! I hope Angelina shows up iin Cannes hand in hand with Brad. I thought people were more intelligent than to believe these magazines and gossip columnists, but obviously, after reading the posts on here, I was wrong!

    Reply
  304. janig said on May 16th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    There is no man on this earth that would put up with AJ’s BS. and now she is expecting again??? Brad has lost his mind if he thinks she wants another bio child. If she is pregnant she purposely got that way to keep her hooks in him — if I were Brad, I would take my bio kids and run like hell, she is one crazy whore and I hate that word but it is what it is!

    Reply
  305. SHEILA said on May 16th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    Before Brad & Angelina even did that movie together I remember back that a lot of news papers said that Angelina would almost always go after the leading man. I really thought his marriage to Jennifer Aniston was strong enough to fight the temptation of that harlot Angelina – but it wasn’t, so sad. Now there are several innocent beautiful children that will be the ones to suffer. Angelina has admitted to have been a heroin addict in the past & said she had many mental issues & was a self inflicting cutter so bad that it has left awful damage to her upper thighs. What really bothers me, is that woman being as crazy as she is was able to adopt that beautiful little boy as a single mother & with all those problems she had in the past & there are so many wonderful people that want children yet are waiting for years to adopt- That saying ” money talks & bull shit walks” is so very true. She should never have been allowed to adopt a dog never mind a child. Of course that was what won Brad Pitt’s heart other than her looks, but you can be beautiful on the outside & ugly on the inside, but so many men want a trophy wife or partner to look good for them & after a while that ugly inside will start to come out till they can’t take it anymore- this is what I think is happening now & Brad feels trapped with all the children that are adopted or biological ! He should get full custody of them children as I read over & over about how selfish this woman is & that Brad takes care of the children as he wants to be so involved in their lives while they are still young. Brad should listen to his parents as they are older & wiser & they see what is going on as they are on the outside looking in. They see things he may not even think about. A snake is a snake & Angelina will not shred her skin or change her ways- May God bless those sweet innocent children that are stuck in the middle of what could end up to be a horrible custody battle !

    Reply
  306. john kupusa said on May 16th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    I feel right bad about the problem jane pitt have with her son brad I could tell on brad face he wasn’t happy with angelia jolie and the way she treat him. mother now best for there child. I learn it the heard way myself. best wishes for brad whatever he decided to do in his life with his kids. I’m still his biggest fan in the whole world. I will still be watching out for him out their only for a near friend because I lost my brothers last year with different kind of diseases. That alrigt know I could live on in my life.
    Your number fan forever
    john kupusa
    R.K.P.

    Reply
  307. keriam said on May 16th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    Please don’t believe everything you read folks. Mrs. Pitt never said such a thing re dumping Angie. Why would Brad go back to Jen? He doesn’t love her (and she doesn’t love him…life moves on) and Jennifer is not and NEVER WAS Brad’s type! Those two had nothing in common. I don’t believe this fake story for one moment! ICU are just trying to sell more mags, obviously. Angelina is a geniunely lovely lady and some peeps are so jealous of her that they will descend to any lower, loser level to create mischief. May God bless this lovely couple, ‘Brangelina,’ who love children so much that they are doing a world of good by adopting kids that nobody wants. Kudos to them!

    Reply
  308. SHEILA said on May 16th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @Mama San:
    I agree with you 100% !

    Reply
  309. SHEILA said on May 16th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @Patty anne:
    I know for a fact that we all will reap what we sow & what comes around goes around. Seems like it now is all coming to a full circle & adultry is in the 10 commandments- at first all was well but there is a time & season for everything & now is their time- both of them did wrong & both will have to suffer for it. I just pray that those beautiful children will be ok through this all & I am sure praying for them !

    Reply
  310. keeeks said on May 16th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    YOU’D THINK SHE WOULD WANT HER SON TO BE HAPPY. MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS, YOU LOD BAG!

    Reply
  311. keeeks said on May 16th, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    old

    Reply
  312. EllieGreen said on May 16th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    I want Brad to go back to jennifer aniston. Please do it brad.

    Reply
  313. Vittorio said on May 16th, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    @Z:
    At first thought, the answer is hell no, of course not! That said, I know that it is possible to slip bullshit in the fine print of a legal doc and not beyond the realm of absolute possibility that there might be a way to get out of something on a technicality. Hey, we lived through OJ.

    Reply
  314. Keane said on May 17th, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    @ Vittorio – not as far as i know, it would be pretty crazy as there are literally dozens of them, maybe 50 or more celebs who do it. They literally take everyone. They couldn;t give diplomatic immunity to every celeb who comes knocking on their door. V tired right now though, will think about it again tomorrow.

    Reply
  315. ianundercoverbitch said on May 17th, 2009 at 11:12 pm

    All these news are bullshit.

    Reply
  316. Canuck said on May 18th, 2009 at 9:28 am

    @Keane:
    I think not. Even regular Ambassadors only have diplomatic immunity in the country to which they are posted and nowhere else. And in order to be posted there, the “credentials” of that person have to be accepted by the host country, which I’m sure isn’t the case for the “Goodwill” people as they have no mandate. So without being posted to a particular country, there is no host country governmental acceptance of the diplomatic status of a Goodwill Ambassador, and hence no immunity. It may be that they get a UN diplomatic passport though, which is primarily useful for not standing in line at the airport. But then, I would think that most of these people don’t end up having to stand in line anyways.

    Reply
  317. Lin said on May 21st, 2009 at 9:43 am

    @pickwick:
    Don’t you people EVER give up! ? The majority of the stuff Halperin writes and the majority of the things that you read about Angelina are NOT true! She and Brad are NOT close to breaking up…Halperin didn’t show the pictures where they have their arms around each other at Cannes and you can tell by the expressions on their faces that they are happy! Obviously, Halperin is ony happy when he is lying! Ellie Green, Pitt is NOT going back to Aniston…he wouldn’t have left her in the first place if he had been happy with her…get that through your head!! Keriam is one of the few posters on this board who has ANY common sense and who does not fall for every little bit of gossipthat many posters hear about Angelina just because they want to believe the worst of her. She has grown up since she adopted Maddox. Oh yeah, by the way, Aniston said in 2003 that Pitt was NOT the love of her life. Obviously he wasn’t, or she would have given him the children he wanted. She chose her career over him…WHY would her EVER go back to that selfish, self-centered woman!? He won’t. I also don’t believe for one second Pitt’s mom ever gave him any kind of advice like what has been said on here, and even if she did, it would have been a PRIVATE conversation between them, and no one would know about it. I highly doubt that Pitt would be happy with his mom for saying anything like that to him or about him, expecially to make it public. It is a false bunch of garbage by rumor-hungry harpies!

    Reply
  318. Lin said on May 23rd, 2009 at 7:23 pm

    The stuff you wrote, Mama San, is such a stretch of the truth. I can’t believe how you twisted things around like you did! For one thing, to start, she did NOT “steal” Pitt. He has a mind of his own and he was NOT HAPPY with Aniston. Angelina did NOT “admit” anything. All she said was that she and Pitt fell in love during filming of Mr. & Mrs. Smith. Pitt left Aniston in JANUARY. Filming went on through MAY! They fell in love AFTER he left Aniston, and he has said that…repeatedly! As far as those breastfeeding covers go, that was Pitt’s idea and HE took the photos! They were beautiful, and did NOT demean nursing mothers in any way AT ALL! How dare they what?! How dare YOU for twisting this into your own nasty thoughts! Another thing, NONE of their adoptions were illegal…they went through the normal, legal processes…you really need to stop spreading the things around that you are spreading! She did not kidnap Pax either…I hope they read what you wrote and sue you for slander! Brad Pitt’s parents do not want her gone…this article by Halperin is nothing but a bunch of lies…Rolling Stone magazine even had trouble with the lies this man writes, and nothing about them says they are or ever were “ashamed” of their son. Recent pictures show them at one of the awards show with THEIR ARMS AROUND Angelina! So put that in your pipe and smoke it! Every single person who KNOWS Angelina and people who meet her think she is great. I hardly think your opinion…your WRONG opinion…matters to them one way or another. I just am still shaking my head at the garbage you wrote. Shame on you!

    Reply
  319. ben said on June 28th, 2010 at 9:25 pm

    Z, YOU ARE JEALOUS BITCH. SHUT UP Z YOU ARE JEALOUS BITCH DAMN YOU UGLY BITTER BITCH

    Reply
  320. MARIA said on June 28th, 2010 at 9:28 pm

    YOU ARE SKANK, JEALOUS BITCH. MOVE ON

    Reply
  321. DODY said on June 28th, 2010 at 9:29 pm

    @ladybert62:
    JANE IS UGLY LIKE JEN. UGLY LIKE UGLY

    Reply
  322. DODY said on June 28th, 2010 at 9:31 pm

    @Z:
    SHUT UP, JEALOUS BITCH. MOVE ON

    Reply
  323. Brennifer 4 lyf !! said on January 14th, 2011 at 11:47 pm

    WOOHOOO GOO JANE!!!
    i really do hope this is true..
    i hope he does heave her coz Angie is the devil in disguise
    i will always stand behing Jennifer no matter what happens
    xx her biggest fan Bella :)

    Reply
  324. penis enlargement said on April 8th, 2011 at 12:16 am

    Thnx so much for this! I haven’t been this thrilled by a blog post for a long time! You’ve got it, whatever that means in blogging. Anyway, You are certainly someone that has something to say that people need to hear. Keep up the outstanding work. Keep on inspiring the people! vimax penis enlargement pills XR2011LAIN_AING

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

May 2009
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta