IUC Exclusive: Teenage Angie Jolie Seduced Her Mother’s Boyfriend

Posted on May 6th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

A voluptuous, horny, devlish teenage Angelina Jolie got her mother Marcheline Bertrand’s boyfriend where she wanted him – in the sack.  This according to a new article in the current issue of Star Magazine.  “March and her guy had a huge fight, and Angie saw her chance to seduce him,” an insider tells Star. “Angie cried and begged March to forgive her. Of course, March did.”   The story also confirms IUC’s claims that Angie cheated on Brad with a female rock star.  Developing…

****UPDATE**** Sugar Ray says he has written the biggest Brangie blockbuster yet.  He says he won’t submit to be posted until we have at least 350 comments on this post.  Please, help!!!!!!

  1. jeannie said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Have you heard about InTouch’s new cover?

    Reply
  2. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:52 am

    This is tame in comparison to the other things she’s done, the stuff that’s expected to come out in the next little while.

    Reply
  3. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:55 am

    @ well – aw you are really teasing us with that, can’t you give us just a teeny, tiny little hint now pretty please???

    Re: this. I made a programme once about a mother who stole her 14 year old daughter’s boyfriend. That family was all kinds of fucked up. No great surprise to me then that the emotionally challenged Jolie got involved in a situation like that. Although I have to say, it really is beyond gross to think about. Bet they jad a GREAT mother daughter relationship after that….!

    Reply
  4. cuze said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am

    Angelina is a living Jerry Springer show.

    Reply
  5. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am

    Oh and I think we can categorically say then that no woman is safe to have her boyfriend around Angelina, including her own mother! What a fab member of the sisterhood she is. No wonder she has next to no friends. I guess the desire to cuckold another woman, like Section 9 says, is greater than the desire to befriend them. What a twisted human being she is.

    Reply
  6. Susanna said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:07 am

    If this is true, there really are no boundaries with her. She has always (as least publicly) worshipped her mother. To do that to the person that you love the most is just twisted. This truly reinforces my belief that she was molested. Only victims of molestation would sexualize every relationship and person in her life like this. It’s like she thinks that she has to prove to herself that she can sexually one-up every woman on earth.

    Reply
  7. Liin said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:08 am

    God she must have been a right attention seeking brat when younger, which she no doubts she blames on her parents…… her parents probably could not control her, hence why she’s just got worse. I generally blame the parents for wayward kids, but she clearly had mental problems from a young age, your right Keane, any woman out there beware!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  8. DonnaInMichigan said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:09 am

    That doesn’t surprise me in the least..

    I mean if she could seduce and bed, Marcheline’s son James (Angies own brother) why wouldn’t it be so far-fetched that Angelina seduce her own mothers boyfriend as well?

    This gal thinks that the only way she can get anything in life, is to use her body.

    Reply
  9. d said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:11 am

    umm star is NOT a reliable source IMO

    Reply
  10. Susanna said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:12 am

    Check out what Lainey posted today — it looks like even she cannot continue to ignore the negative press around Brangie, and she posted a link to the In Touch cover which says that Brad and Jen met up on the night of April 23rd. She also calls them out on the famewhoring and hauling the kids out for photo ops to combat negative press. Even Angie’s fans are turning on her.

    “Brace yourselves today. You’ve been accustomed to the Twi-hard psychosis lately and they are indeed f-cking crazy. But don’t forget about the Brangelunatics. The Brangelunatics often take it to a new level. And they are losing their balls today over In Touch Magazine’s brand new cover. As you know, it’s never the most reliable source but this week, they’re feeding the triangle with a front page blast about Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston getting back together having secretly hooked up on the evening of April 23rd. Also – they’re wearing the same necklace. Click here to see. This one will make the rounds.

    So what’s next? You know what’s next. They’ll gauge how far this story travels and how much damage it does or doesn’t inflict on their brand. If it’s minor, they’ll bring the Chosen One Shiloh out for a pap spin, super easy. If it’s bad though, well, it might be time to haul the twins out…

    I love this game, don’t you?”

    Reply
  11. Putznasher said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    WTF, Did Angie grow up in a trailer park?

    Reply
  12. heaven's in you said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:29 am

    @Susanna:
    Holie didn’t worship her mother, that’s just her media spin. James Haven let it slip that neither one of them was with their mother when she passed away. Marcie Lynn Bertrand died alone in a hospital while her ’saintly’ daughter chased Brad to New Orleans. This was during one of the Brange’s many break ups when Pitt fled to their home in NOLA. Holie was more interested in getting him back then being with her dying mother, so she and Holly took off for the Big Easy. There are pictures of Holly and Holie partying in NO the night before Bertrand died. Don’t believe the tears. Holie uses her mother’s death to get sympathy from the public.

    Reply
  13. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:33 am

    @Keane:Keane, I gave you a ‘teaser’ on the last thread about my last direct communication with her a few years ago. It touches on my last experience with her, but there are so many other details around that situation that I cannot talk about. But that should give you some insight into the kind of person she is.

    Reply
  14. guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    http://coverawards.com/2009/05/06/news_angelina_jolie_secrets_and_lies_31797/

    Star Magazine brings back bad Angelina Jolie for its cover story. She cheated on Brad with a rock star and schemed to destroy Jen. Plus, did you hear? She’s apparently pregnant.

    Topping it all off? Angelina slept with her mom’s boyfriend.

    http://coverawards.com/2009/05/06/news_brad_pitt_jennifer_aniston_together_again_37197/

    In Touch is reporting that Jen and Brad met on the night of April 23rd. Apparently, Brad defied Angelina – never a smart move! The magazine is reporting all the details of their reunion, including the intimate location, the gifts and his surprising confession.

    Plus, and this is a BIG plus, Brad is wearing the necklace Jen gave him.

    Do you think readers will buy a Jen & Brad cover in 2009?

    Without a doubt!

    Reply
  15. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:37 am

    @ well – yes thanks I saw that, did you see my response? I am no stranger to the attacks of The Angelinabeest! Lol!

    Reply
  16. Guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    Angelina Jolie is a jealous, cunning liar who schemed to lure Brad Pitt away from Jennifer Aniston cheated on him with a woman rock star, — and even slept with her own mother’s boyfriend! These are just some of the explosive revelations that could be served up about Hollywood’s most famous mom in two shocking new tell-all books.

    In the May 18 issue of Star — on sale today — we have the inside stories about the books about Brad’s baby mama — one to be written by renowned investigative reporter Andrew Morton, the other by Angie’s former bodyguard Mickey Brett — and the revelations they could include paint an unflattering picture of the wild child-turned humanitarian.

    One of the shocking claims — detailed in our cover story — that could find its way into one of the books is that a teenage Angelina hooked up with her mother Marcheline’s boyfriend.

    “March and her guy had a huge fight, and Angie saw her chance to seduce him,” an insider tells Star. “Angie cried and begged March to forgive her. Of course, March did.”

    Morton and his team of researchers are now in LA starting work on his blockbuster. And if he misses any juicy scandals, the ex-bodyguard has his own stories, including her hush-hush liaison with one of the biggest names in rock.

    “Mickey the bodyguard knew all about this relationship,” an insider tells Star. “And the details are pretty hot!”

    Reply
  17. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    Oh dear those cover stories, the sharks are circling for Angelina! Even arch loon Lainey sounds like she is about to jump ship! That bitch knows on what side her bread is buttered. I can see her declaring her undying love for Jen the moment she hooks up with Brad. Poor Angie will be thrown under the Lainey bus! LMAO.

    Reply
  18. ml said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    @Susanna:
    thank you. been saying that forever. her whole MO is about, as you say, sexually one-upping. She is a classic borderline personality disorder. and they dont get better easily. Yes AJ we get it. youve had graet sex…none of the rest of us even come close. what a head case.

    Reply
  19. Guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:51 am

    @Keane: She deserves it.

    Reply
  20. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:05 am

    This could explain a few things. Many of us have agreed on different articles that mother & daughters relationship was odd. If AJ was abused in the care of her mother, the guilt of her mom would perhaps allow AJ to do whatever & forgive. Or maybe there is more than just AJ “stealing” her mothers boyfriends.

    Reply
  21. omgwtflol said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    Hang on a second…the mother’s boyfriend bedded the teenage daughter? Um, isn’t that statutory rape? What on earth did the mother need to forgive? The mother failed to protect her daughter from an obvious asshole. That’s some twisted shit right there!

    yeah, angie has serious issues but they start in that house with the permissive, spineless mother who exposed her to lord knows what.

    Reply
  22. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    @omgwtflol:
    EXACTLY!

    Reply
  23. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:26 am

    Checking out a few others to see what’s going on. If this was already posted sorry. It’s kinda funny.

    http://www.dlisted.com/node/31919

    Reply
  24. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    @ omgwtflol – yes I tend to agree with that. I certainly think that AJ felt ignored by both of her parents and you certainly would do if your mom had a revolving door of boyfriends coming into their home throughout her life. She was bound to feel ignored every time her mom hooked up or fell for someone else. Maybe this sleeping with her boyfriend thing was a way of getting back at her or getting her attention. I’m not a bleeding heart but I do tend to think that a lot of mental illness is caused by issues relating to how one was treated as a child. I certainly have seen that with a lot of my friends and psychologist friends definitely support this theory. Which is why I get very angry when I think about how Brangelina’s kids may be being treated and the damage that is potentially being done to them. Children need far more than money and the attention of nannies to grow up to be happy adults. They need a lot of love and attention from their parents otherwise they grow up with no self-worth and develop mental health problems in adulthood. I have so many examples of this amongst my friends. So was AJ damaged by her upbringing? I would say she was too. Its funny though that all we ever hear from her was how wonderful her mother was and how much she hated her dad. Sounds like someone got demonised at the expense of keeping a relationship with the other to me. JMO.

    Reply
  25. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @ bettieboop – how funny, and he goes through all the suspects we’ve been through too! Well SR said it was Madge but she’s Queen of pop and is Stefani really a rock star? Ian says Gwen likes chicks and is obsessed with her. To me a rock star can only be really one of two people: Pink or Joan Jett. We shall see!

    Reply
  26. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    So is the In Touch cover talking about the same meeting that SRRC told us about a week or so ago? Nice scoop Sugar!

    Reply
  27. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    Sounds like Brad is paying her back for that diaper and toilet paper leak , so today the guy bashed Jen.

    Reply
  28. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    Maybe it is Queen Latifah.

    Reply
  29. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    @Canuck:
    Make that on April 25. Impressive inside info SR.

    Reply
  30. Patty anne said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    Just tossing out what i have heard; Jolie’s lessie Rock Star was Christina Agulara. Now i have no clue if this is true or not, but in my opinion, i doubt it. I do know Christina was having a heavy drinking problem awhile back, but girl-sex with AJ?….I hope not!

    Reply
  31. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    @ Kate – that’s what I think too, its such a silly game to play on Ange’s part. If she fires at him, he will fire back 5 times as hard, and in a classier way too. Silly, silly Ange.

    @ justhelping – she’s not really “rock” though is she, isn’t she more r’n'b or rap or something? I actually have never heard a Queen Latifah record in my life. She’s not that famous in the UK.

    Reply
  32. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    @ Patty Anne – oh Aguilera is way into girls, she is quite opeb about that, so I could totally see it. Britney said she tried to snog her once in an interview so I don’t think she has high standards! Lol. But again she’s defo not “rock”, she’s “pop”. Where did you hear it was her can you say? I actually think AJ could easily have done all of these women. None of them I would be shocked by.

    Reply
  33. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    yeah, you’re right. I guess I was thinking of th bi-racial couple, but that was men I think. There are stories floating around about Pink being bi. Her rep denied it. @Keane:

    Reply
  34. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    @Patty anne:Nope it was Katy Perry. AJ said that the song I kissed a Girl was written about her, to someone I know.

    Reply
  35. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    @well:Or rather, this may not be the ‘rock star’ in question, but rumor has it that they hooked up too.

    Reply
  36. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    I saw another poster on another site said AJ tried to hook up with either Sara or Teegan at one of their concerts. She got turned down. I think the girls were around 19 or 20 at the time. She is like a vulture.
    And I have to say, when I watched M&MS, I laughed so hard. She was totally trying to seduce BP. What did she learn at Lee Strasberg, cause she sucks. no pun intended.
    Also, after she slept with mom’s bf, did mom keep him around? Who could this be?

    Reply
  37. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    @justhelping:
    The start of threesomes.

    Reply
  38. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    Keane do you remember the postings from ME a few articles back?

    Reply
  39. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    @well:
    Is BP now well aware of the type of person she is? Now that probably sounds stupid because we’ve all been reading about the type of person she is but I mean the type of person she REALLY is. Are others aware of the shit she caused you?

    Reply
  40. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    @ justhelping – oh Pink is fully out as bi, she’s just done an interview talking about it, and has done them before.

    @ well – was Ange the one wearing the “cherry chapstick” or was that creative licence?! Ian talks about Katy Perry being bi all the time. But I don’t know if I believe that song was written about her, don’t you think it just sounds like Ange thinks she’s the subject of everyone’s fantasies and if a song was written about kissing a woman it would have to be about her?! Lol. All my lesbian friends hate that song BTW, it is pathetic. “I kissed a girl but I still go home to my boyfriend ok?” should be the title really!

    Reply
  41. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    @ bb – I do indeed, why do you mention it? I might know what you’re getting at.

    Reply
  42. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    I remember the ME postings. @bettieboop:

    Reply
  43. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @bettieboop:Yes, there are many who know. Many, mostly in the industry. I’m not the only one she’s done similar things to. There are many of us out there. Her wrath towards me was a little more extreme because she viewed me as a threat.

    Reply
  44. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    @Keane:
    I think you do. Is it possible?

    Reply
  45. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @ bb – yes.

    Reply
  46. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    @Keane:I don’t know what is creative license within the song, I just know she said something to the effect that she was hanging out with Katy Perry and a song came out of it to someone I know.

    Reply
  47. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    @well:
    I’m so sorry. She is one fucked up person. I do hope she gets everything & I mean EVERYTHING she deserves.

    Reply
  48. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    @Keane:
    Ok let the rest of us dummies in on the joke – you think that the poster called “ME” was the evil Ms. Jolie? Or is it something else?

    Reply
  49. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    Guys I am Me. Sorry I didn’t say anything sooner, I just wanted to fly under the radar so I could work on getting strong enough to finally talk about this, other than posting on a message board. I mean no ill-will, I am not her *shudder*. Please go easy on me.

    Reply
  50. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    @ ladybert62 – its no big deal. ME was undoubtedly one of Angie’s team yes. Its no joke or anything like that. BB was just making a point which I think I get the meaning of and I was agreeing with her. Sorry can’t go into it any more at this stage, its no great mystery honest!

    Reply
  51. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    well, its okay. actually I have been wondering about you. we understand. just remember we support you here.

    Reply
  52. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    now i am confused. oh well nothing new.

    Reply
  53. ml said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    @Keane:
    keane another report by pink is denying the bi story.

    Reply
  54. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    @Keane:
    Thank you for clarification! :-)

    Reply
  55. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    @ ml – this was an interview with her in which she was directly quoted. Can’t remember where sorry but I have read it. Maybe someone has advised her to deny it? I’ve heard her talk about experiences with girls in interviews before anyway. Man she was witnessed snogging that girl from Terminator 3 at a party a few years back and spoke to the reporter about it afterwards. I have no idea why she would now be trying to deny it.

    Reply
  56. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    So do we think this was the Brangelina story Ian was talking about yesterday? Or are we still waiting for that?

    Reply
  57. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @Keane:
    In regards to Brad firing back at Angie, remember when her mother died, Brad had her mothers diary. She is a fool to try and destroy his reputation, she will never say a bad word about her in public because she is the mother of his children, he will let IT and Star do if for him …

    Reply
  58. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @well:
    If I recall correctly there was “Me” and “me” at the same time. So you were the sane one and AJ (or one of her peeps) was the other one?? Just another attempt to get at you, huh? That was when there suuddenly was a hole crop of new posters with similiar names to those of the regular posters.

    Reply
  59. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    Hey everybody where ate you???? I’m starting to feel like a thread killer here…LOL!

    Reply
  60. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    @Keane:
    And what about the Mick Jagger story? Did we ever resolve the mystery on that one? :-(

    Reply
  61. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    @too curious:
    where are you??? obviously same place as my brain…MIA!

    Reply
  62. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    @too curious:LOL. Well, whether I’m sane is open to opinion I guess.

    All I know is that I ran across this site after googling Brad Pitt on google news to see if the break up was being announced yet. When I started to read it, for the first time I saw the non PR’ed shite, and people had a clear perception of who she was. I felt stronger, and more comfortable. Then I posted a message to her letting her know that I wasn’t going to tolerate her BS anymore.

    It didn’t go over well, people assumed I was someone else. So again, I tried to figure out what was going on here, and again I got the courage to come up again with the ‘well’ name.

    Any other posters with similar names were and are unrelated to me and my interest in posting here.

    Reply
  63. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    @well:
    Yeah I remember the other “me”. I think she was from like Poland for something. Her English wasn’t very good. I think it was just a coincidence that you guys had the same name.

    Reply
  64. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    @Keane:
    I was wondering that as well because he said a Brange story was coming the next day and then he put the Brad and Jen story up the same day, and that is not really a Brange story is it, but maybe so since it does affect his marriage to Jolie.

    I thought perhaps he would be posting another story today and that was just a side story. Funny, the IT story sounds on surface what he is saying but it really just says Brad picked Jen up to tell her he was working on his marriage and he was wearing the necklace that Jen gave him for his 45 birthday, which he had on last week also when he went to the Falls with his parents and was walking around Manhattan. He was wearing it with the pink rope.

    Then we get this story with CC and DA. I would not be surprised to learn that they made arrangements to meet at the concert. I really doubt it was just a coincidence.

    SR had cited the April 23 date because it was the Cherry Blossum Festival and they also went around to other sites, remember, and her said Brad was on fire for someone and feeling alive again. Then we got the story of him having a invigorating shower for his new Bunny Boo, which is obviously Jennifer.

    So where does that leave the split announcement. People are coming out of the cracks like roaches turning on her, so how long can she say silly little things like “Brad is coming over to watch the fight”, what next, at Cannes, “we are going to try for another baby this year”…….

    I tell you what, Daryl was only printing negative Brad stories, in the comments someone named Bob called him out on just leaking negative Brad stories, said they did not think he really had the book or there would be a negative Ang story…well next day we got Ang and the closet friend…then no one the next day cause Ian did the Jen and Brad story, but he waited and came out with this Brad hated Jen story…

    How convenient. I told ya, Angelina is using the LA Examiner to discredit IAN and BRAD at the same time. Since BRAD is fighting back, now she is going after Jennifer. Let’s see what happens now. lmao

    Bitch is so predictable.

    Reply
  65. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    @well:
    There probably should be a Surgeon General’s warning on this website as it is addicting as hell!! I was addicted after the first day I think. Although I don’t work in that arena I have a marketing degree and have always been fascinated by spin and PR ploys…

    Reply
  66. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    @well:
    Well, welcome to the club, WELL! Our goal in life is to take down the evil Ms. Jolie and expose her for the hypocrite (the least vile word I could think of right now) that she is. And the usual mantra applies – everything I do, say, think or write about anyone, place or thing in the past, present or future is always my opinion only forever and ever amen! :-)

    Reply
  67. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Amen, Sister! Same here :)

    Reply
  68. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    @Kate:Kate, I think the split will be announced sooner rather than later. AJ has no film commitments after Salt for some time right? And BP is filming this summer in Brazil? I think the split will be announced between the end of Salt filming and before or during the filming of the Legend of Z. They’re not going to want negative publicity during her filming, but when Brad goes back to Jen…it will be good news! And won’t hurt the movie he’ll be filming, on the contrary actually.

    Reply
  69. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    @well:
    I’m going to be positive & say with your new name you are feeling better & stronger.

    Reply
  70. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    @too curious:
    Funny! :-) :-)

    Reply
  71. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    @too curious:yes I must say, this is a welcome change from the other PR’ed garbage out there. And it’s amazing how much the media controls our perceptions of the world and how we blindly believe so much.
    @ladybert62:Thanks. Nice disclaimer! LOL. And for the record, everything I say is also just my opinion.

    Reply
  72. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    @Kate:
    Oh how juicy. BP had/has her mom’s diary. What are the odds of him keeping it or giving it to AJ?

    Reply
  73. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    and who is the hapless Mr. Pitt bringing to Cannes? Is it the evil Ms. Jolie (no, no, no) or the sweet Ms. Jennifer (yes, yes, yes) and will the hapless Mr. Pitt be wearing the “hex-preventative” pink necklace? ;_)

    Reply
  74. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    @too curious:
    Ian, I mean that in a GOOD way, if you know what I mean? It’s addicting because you don’t print the PR BS that gets churned out in such high volume. And I like your writing style, too :)

    Ok, I’m going a little crazy with the smiley faces today but our company is gone and my kitty and I have the place to ourselves today while my honey is at work (I’m an unemployed bum at the moment). Love our friends and their 4 1/2 year old son (our “nephew” ) dearly but boy is it exhausting keeping up with him. “Aunt Too Curious come find me” “Aunt Too Curious will you play a game with me?” and of course, if Aunt Too Curious and Uncle married-to-Aunt-Too-Curious needed to go anywhere we had a friend to come along. I have a theory that kids get there high energy levels by sucking it out of all adults in their vicinity :)

    By the way, I now know how to make Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle masks if anyone ever needs to!

    Reply
  75. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    @well:
    Are you the one who said she had her eggs implanted with sperm she bought because Brad had slow swimmers?

    Reply
  76. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Dang! My funny face didnt work! Have to practice more ;-)

    Reply
  77. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @ladybert62:
    You love that necklace, don’t you? LOL. I think he will go solo on this one. If he goes with AJ, then we’ll have to get our monocles out and observe observe observe.

    Reply
  78. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Hmmm…good question!

    If anyone ever finds out the origin of the pink “hex-preventative” necklace I think we need to get one for each Ian, SRRC, Ms 9cent, Keane, Kate and Well

    Reply
  79. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    Yeah since mom was primary caretaker — or at least seems to be — you figure it had to have been her lax parenting at best, that created the wack-job you see before you today.

    BTW I BELIEVE HER TEAM IS ON TED’S BOARD TRYING TO WAVE AWAY THE NOTION THAT PHOTOGS WERE IN FACT INVOLVED IN THE LI GROCERY SHOPPING SHOOT. MAYBE WE SHOULD DRIVE UP THE NUMBERS ON THE THREAD TO DISCREDIT THAT (w/o falling into the trap of mentioning JA, or responding to comments about her, intended to throw it off course, since she has nothing to do with it anyway)

    Reply
  80. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    You are SO right – that necklace drives me stark raving screaming – along with the Mick Jagger story (I need to know the answer on that on!!!) :-) And I think you are right, Solo at Cannes is the best (and easiest) way out right now ;-)

    Reply
  81. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    I meant magnifying glasses… not monocles.

    Reply
  82. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    @p:
    OMG! I saw that at Ted’s. I was left in awe at all the comments contradicting the photo shoot “candids”. I know Ted doesn’t have that many loons as fans. Maybe Twiloons, but LOONS… no way. It’s fishy.

    Reply
  83. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @Kate:I shouldn’t have said that. Ugh I wish I could take it back. I just heard through the grapevine – years ago – that there were problems trying to conceive the natural way and that invitro was the next step. When he was with JA.

    Reply
  84. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    @too curious:
    I’m with you about being addicted. WOW!

    Reply
  85. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    @well:
    They don’t want negative publicity, to late for that. A split sooner would be positive. IMO

    Reply
  86. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine: . Go for it! The attempts are pretty feeble, but it’ll send a message to e! online, not to do this shit anymore.

    Reply
  87. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @too curious:
    I second that idea!

    Reply
  88. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    @bettieboop:yes but there is a PR process they need to follow. First some leaks of a break up…let everyone digest it and let it sit for awhile. Then time apart, then a story of how they’re living separate lives. Then the leaks about BP and JA together again. Introduce the concept, see how the fans and public deal with it and then go from there. Remember these people are considered the HW power couple, and there’s alot resting on it….including the perceived wellfare of 6 gorgeous kids. I’m sure there’s a plan, they just want to ease it in to avoid any ’shock’. I just wish to God it would happen already!!!!

    Reply
  89. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    @ well – thing is what you have said is far more than just your opinion. You have made allegations of serious criminal activity against Angelina. Harrassment is a serious crime. And there is no way you would be able to go public with those allegations unless you had reported it all to the police and she had been convicted of it, which she hasn’t. Otherwise it would be highly libellous and no publication would print at. Plus I can’t really understand your thinking in going into detail about a harrassment case on a site that you know Angelina reads. Wouldn’t that be giving her quite a bit or warning of it and even more reason to go after you? I can’t see why anyone who had made criminial charges of harrassment against someone would then discuss it on a gossip site. Plus you would then arguably have problems with sub-judicy.

    Reply
  90. ml said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @Keane:
    it was a half-denial. she says she’s not bi but does imply she experimented. i cant see pinks career (does she have one?) being anything but helped by admission of bisexuality.

    Reply
  91. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @Keane:Oh God here we go again. Do you think I would come on here, make all these allegations if I couldn’t back them up? This has been brewing for ages, I just haven’t been strong enough to address them. The police were involved, more than just once, and so were my attorneys and her attorneys too. I was told that there is either a no-contact or restraining order too, as she went through someone else saying she wasn’t allowed to contact me directly. Believe me, the last thing she wants to do is bring me to court and put me on the stand.

    Reply
  92. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    @well:
    Well, it is hitting the “mainstream media” – Huffingtonpost.com has a section mentioning the story of the Brad/Jennifer re-hookup (my words): (is “huffingtonpost.com” considered main stream media?). Anyway, my “uneducated about anything having to do with public relations” opinion, is that it is going to happen faster than expected and I think that is because there have been pictures “out there” (think mainstream media again) about how awful the hapless Mr. Pitt has looked in the past few weeks – and the general public (as in even my husband! without me even saying a word!) is becoming aware of the hapless Mr. Pitt’s unhappiness; I think this is going to steamroll and go faster than normally expected. Again, all of this creative writing is my just opinion about the unholy trinity. ;-)

    Reply
  93. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    @well:
    So you didn’t take the settlement? ;)
    No wonder she’s so damn skinny… so many calories burned trying to clean up after herself (and not being depressed about mother’s death). JMO.

    Reply
  94. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    @ well – you’re posting completely annonymously here so anyone can say anything pretty much and get away with it. If you were using your real name then maybe not, but you aren’t. Unless Angelina has been convicted of a criminal offence, which we all know she hasn’t cos it would have been all over the news, then you could not go “public” with your allegations as you say. Unless someone has been convicted of the offence in a court of law you can’t make that allegation without your ass being sued off and a newspaper would not touch you. Everyone knows that. Plus talking about it here has now prejudiced your case so you basically wouldn’t have one. Her laywer could get her off using that. I’m sure if everything is as you say it is you won’t mind asking some questions regarding some major problems with what you’ve just said. I wouldn’t mind if someone was questioning me. You have to understand that you are making very serious allegations against someone. You need evidence and proof to back it up with and it would have to have gone through the criminial courts before you could say anything about it in the press.

    Reply
  95. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane, I’m sure there are subtleties lost on me, and I have definitely not been on as much lately as I was, but I’m not seeing the diff between you mentioning the (CYA alert!) alleged hacking and Well mentioning the (CYA Alert) alleged harassment. Would you mind explaining? I’m not questioning you on your experience, I’m just not up on the liable/slander laws as I know you are and am obviously missing something. And I do appreciate your clear thinking and questioning of what may be off in other’s posts – thanks :)

    Reply
  96. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    @ too curious – basically I could not go public with a story using my real name or even annonymously (in a name withheld type way as Ian is doing) with allegations that Angelina hacked into my e-mail. I can say here that I suspect it was her in the light of what has been going onn but I could not make that accusation under my real name in public. If I had managed to trace the person who had hacked my account and criminal charges were brought against them and they were convicted of it in a court of law then obviously it could be talked about in the press. But I couldn’t go “public” as it were without this criminal conviction. No newspaper would print it. Basically its highly unlikely that I could trace the hacker and the person who stole my identity so there isn’t much I can do about it. But if “well” is saying she is definitely going public with it she would have to have a criminial conviction against Angelian first (and her charge is much more serious, harrassment which caused her to seek counselling is way more serious than just posting under my name on the net, Angelina could go to jail if convicted). Plus in the UK there is the issue of sub-judice – which is if you talk about a case in public before or while it is still being tried you prejudice the trial and are in contempt of court (another offence), which is why when you see cop shows or whatever faces are often blurred out if that trial is still ongoing. US laws are slightly different, but there is a suggestion for example that TMZ publishing that pic of Rihanna’s bruises may be used by CB’s attorney to get him off as they will argue it has unfairly prejudiced their trial. If “well” was going to court about something she shouldn’t be talking about it here, particularly when she knows Ange and her team are watching and commmenting on this site.

    Reply
  97. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    @Keane:
    Ok, got it now, thanks!!

    Reply
  98. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    @ HH – Ian – that is a lot of comments to make up! Can they all just say “hi” or “yes” or “ok” or something? We’ll be here all night otherwise!

    Reply
  99. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    What – no new blockbuster info until there are 350 comments? What a tease you are Sugar Ray!! – OK here I go, where is that repeat button? :-)

    Reply
  100. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @ tc – so yeah there are some big problems with what she’s saying, I hope you can see where I’m coming from now.

    Reply
  101. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    OK, I went back to Ted’s comment section on the tell-all book thing. Anyway, I saw this person’s comments called Truth Teller and this is what they wrote.

    ” TruthTeller Wed, May 6, 2009, 11:04 AM

    People, people no one is jealous or hating on Angie: get it straight. The reason why people are all over her is because the great majority know she is deceptive and not putting forward the truth. She is an extremely shrewd and manipulative woman… and there are few things worse than using kids and humanitarian work for your own agenda. (I should know, I am an author and have worked and spoken at the UN, Geneva.) Angelina is a ticking time bomb before the real truth comes out about their disastrous charade. Ted is truly and deeply respected around the world because he actually is one of the very, very few in this lost industry who DOES have to courage to call things out. But yes, there is a legal rottweiler around Brangie; which has no bearing on Ted’s fearlessness. Angelina Jolie is symptomatic of one of the great dangers of the world: image, image, image. It is all we consume. She has capitalized on it to the nth degree, but her house of cards is about to fall. YAY TRUTH AND YAY TED ”

    ” TruthTeller Wed, May 6, 2009, 11:11 AM

    Forgot to add that I work with kids too, and this is why I am so dang passionate that people like AJ get outed. It is utterly incomprehensible what is happening to this generation of kids because our entire society is drunk on all the wrong things. And yes, I feel fully qualified to comment on this topic because I have genuinely given my entire life to helping the vast number of people drowning in themselves in this culture. No photo ops. Because when you t r u l y give, it is not about you. AJ and BP captivated the world because they are selling a pretty picture. And it is about to blow up. This is why we have people coming apart at the seams at every street corner. Connect the dots folks. ”

    ” TruthTeller Wed, May 6, 2009, 12:06 PM

    Outer- I commend YOU. Thank you for demonstrating true beauty. And yes, you are precisely right, it wouldn’t matter nearly as much if she weren’t dragging multiple children from all of the world (or anywhere for that matter but it particularly heinous what she does… renaming included); not to mention NGO’s and other actual humanitarian agencies, all into her web of spin. Yeah, she reeeally cares about the world. That is why she plays assassins in every movie. Because I am sure Sydney Poitier did the same thing. Wait, NOT. newsflash: Greatness is not contrived and it cannot be manufactured. There is no substitute for sacrifice and the absence of self-interest. And to Profit—oh ya bettah believe it, I am, I am. Working on a project to knock your socks off, because you and everyone else deserve a very different world than this one perched on the edge of a cliff. And make no mistake, it is. signed, TruthTellerAflame@gmail.com xo ”

    Then, I googled his/her name to see what I get. I found this that the person had written on E!’s UK version a couple of months ago.

    “TruthTeller Sat, Feb 21, 2009, 1:50 PM

    How about all this venom and hatred here… wow. I read these to see if people know the truth about AJ. Most are still drinking that koolaid, and their denial is made visible by how defensive and hostile they are. I am a Goodwill Ambassador, have spoken at the UN, have worked in Africa, and I live in the center of Hollywood and know far more about these people than I care to. The TRUTH is, AJ is the opposite of the image she portrays. She is a shrewd, conniving, self-deceptive, drug user. There is more drama between her and BP than people realize, (not conjecture–I know people who have worked with them). Their greatest acting job has been this charade they have put forth to the world in some tragic faux-humility, narcissistic, megolamaniac quest for power. The darkest people are never the ones who approach with a weapon… they are the people who will smile and posture goodwill–all for their own gain. AJ/BP are emblematic of our culture in general. Our world is drowning in denial. ”

    ” TruthTeller Sat, Feb 21, 2009, 2:19 PM

    Oh, and I am not a paid blogger. And I genuinely respect Ted Casablanca. He is a rare jewel of a human being who is fearless with the truth as well as joyful. His heart is as big as the moon—he is wise. And a wise a**. The best combination and it is all too rare. And one more thing: add T.C. and Oprah to the AJ/BP list of Icons Of Denial all fronting as if they are helping people when in truth, it is all about their power hungry agendas. The issue is duplicity, folks. Wake Up. It is only when the masses of people catch on, that their whole unfortunate charades will be exposed. Have the courage to see the truth for what it is, not for what you want it to be. Thank You Ted for always rocking it. ”

    TruthTellerAflame@gmail.com Sat, Feb 21, 2009, 3:09 PM

    to WOW! What a delight to see someone GET IT!!! ** If you want to know about a project that is set to ignite things in our culture–pertaining to what I have written about above, then write me and I will keep you in the loop. It is very exciting stuff!!! 2009 is going to be quite an exciting year for our world to be waking up. Things really can be so very different than the madness abounding. (exemplified by AJ and much of Hollywood). And yes, Ted has far more ethics and cojones that 99% of most journalists. (I know from having been interviewed many times. I am an author that is working night and day for this generation—and for everyone.) With love aflame, the other TT * ”

    What is going on? How many people are on to this? What is this year gonna bring? This is crazy!
    Sorry that this post is gonna end up being so long. Just thought it was interesting and wanted to share it.

    Reply
  102. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    Ok. I’ll help drive up the comments. :)

    Reply
  103. HisHighness said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @Keane:
    I don’t care what anyone says even if it’s one word. Sugar says he won’t deliver the goods until he gets his wish because he worked very hard to get this info.

    Reply
  104. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    OK Ian and Sugar Ray – only 247 more to go – where is everyone else – I cant do this by myself! :-( Help! See the latest from Ian/SR – what reasons known only to (s)him – he wants 350 posts before new info is added? Why? Does this one (full of complaints) count? :-)

    Reply
  105. moo said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    just thought I’d help along and say hello everyone

    Reply
  106. moo said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Oh and I hope you are all well

    Reply
  107. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Ok – I am working hard here to get the count up – only 245 to go? My fingers are exhausted! Where is everyone else? ;-)

    Reply
  108. moo said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Hey Keane are you feeling any better today? I hope so xx

    Reply
  109. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @ HH – I’m sure he did, we will look forward to it! Ok people, let’s get a-commenting!

    Reply
  110. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @Keane:
    What are you referring to? I looked about & didn’t see a comment from him.

    Reply
  111. HisHighness said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @ladybert62:
    no need to worry – Sugar just emailed me saying he will release the bomb tonight around 9pm, regardless of the comments. Thanks to all for your support.

    Reply
  112. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @moo:
    Hey – everyone MOO is talking to his/her self? Does that make her/him a Moo-Moo? Only 241 to go – got to roll that rock up that hill – keep on trucking! Will it finally answer the Mick Jagger questions? Probably not as SR does not answer questions – just keep posing. :-)

    Reply
  113. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @ moo – a little better thanks hun, me and my stupid immune system are never the best of friends. Are you the one who said you used to live in Manc and are currently abroad with hubby’s work? If so where you at if you don’t mind me asking?x

    Reply
  114. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @bettieboop:
    Sorry. Just went all the way up.

    Reply
  115. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    Hi

    Reply
  116. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    Well, I hope what I posted above gives you guys enough to grow on. I can’t hang out right now ’cause I gotta go Mother’s Day shopping. I wish I could contribute more to the 350 comments. Have fun guys!

    HH – are you the Truth Teller? :) The other voice of our generation ’cause we all know Kanye is the original voice of our generation LMAO.

    Reply
  117. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @HisHighness:
    YIPPEE – 9:00 your time? Let me try and calculate what time that is for me! Got it! Thanks HH, Ian and lovely SR! :-)

    Reply
  118. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    HH

    Reply
  119. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @ bb – oop top in wit post (that was a bit of a manc accent for moo’s benefit!)

    Reply
  120. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @Keane:Absolutely, I encourage you to question everything you see and hear. You’re right, I could be anyone posting malicious things just for the heck of it. How about this? Why don’t you give me the benefit of the doubt and as much creedence as you see fit and we’ll see where we go from there. k?

    Reply
  121. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @ HH – oh that’s 2am UK time, no fair!

    Reply
  122. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    @HisHighness:
    YIPPY!!!

    Reply
  123. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @Keane:
    She caught on pretty quick. Busted.

    Reply
  124. moo said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @Keane:
    Yep that’s me. I’m currently in sunny Cyprus.

    Reply
  125. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @bettieboop:
    Hi BettieBook – look back at the beginning of the article – there is an additional comment that says new info to be posted when 350 comments are made – then later on, HH says that SR will release the bomb at 9:00 his (her?) time… keep on trucking, keep talking. :-)

    Reply
  126. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    OK, glad we don”t have to rush to 350 posts – I was trying one word at a time and kept getting a message to slow down, I was posting too quickly

    HH and SRRC – can’t wait :)

    Reply
  127. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @ well – I’m afraid I can’t because there are two major problems with what you said which makes me think you can’t be telling the truth. You haven’t given any explanation for them and basically there isn’t one. I didn’t believe “Me” was legit either so the moment you said that was you too that was it for me. Other people can come to their own conclusions but unfortunately I am now sure that you can’t be for real. Sorry.

    Reply
  128. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Well, it’s already 10:30 PM where I am. Guess I won’t get the news until tomorrow morning. :( But by that time you all would have deciphered it. So there is a silver lining.

    Reply
  129. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @too curious:
    you are so loquatious today (spelling?) :-)

    Reply
  130. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    @ bb – good catch my friend, I think you were right there. We were obviously on the same page!

    Reply
  131. moo said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    @Keane:
    Thats 4.00am my time but school starts at 7.25 so I should be up reading quite early anyway. What timezone is Ian in?

    Reply
  132. Peri said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    SR drives a hard bargain. I’ve been sitting on my hands all this time, keeping comments and thoughts to myself, but I can’t hush now when there are posting counts to be made! I want to hear this new story.

    C’mon folks! Post!

    Reply
  133. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    So if we post 350 before 9:00 do we get the scoop?

    Reply
  134. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @ moo – ooh cyprus, alright for bloody some! You there for long? Is it a military thing? My grandparents used to move around the world with the navy a lot, Bolton included in fact! I’m not sure about timezones but Ian is usually 5 hrs behind UK time. I’m not sure where he is right now though.

    Reply
  135. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    @Keane:What are the problems with what I’ve said?

    Reply
  136. lisa said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    i cannot wait for the split to be official! Team Jen!

    Reply
  137. Peri said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    And as usual, I’m slow. By the time I catch up and decide to post, there’s been fifty new posts and new information out there.

    SR – Please, give us the story sooner rather than 9ish. *sweet smile*

    Reply
  138. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    I think Ian’s trying to force me out.

    Reply
  139. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    @Peri:
    I second pretty please that request.

    Reply
  140. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    Sugar, you’re my hero

    Reply
  141. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    And Sugar, I love your dress

    Reply
  142. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    @Keane:
    When he said 9:00 pm what time zone?

    Reply
  143. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    And if I keep complimenting you, will you make it not too torturous to figure out?

    Reply
  144. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    @Peri:
    Thank you Peri! :-) Maybe if we get to 350 the 9:00 will be dropped!

    Reply
  145. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @Canuck:
    You are funny – that approach never occurred to me ! :-)

    Reply
  146. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @Canuck:
    Me, too! And Sugar, sweetie, if you were to post earlier than 9:00 then you would have a little more “you” time, something all of us girls need :)

    Reply
  147. DebFrmHell said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @well:@well:</@well:
    I believe you. And I enjoy reading your side of the Brand. I hope you keep posting here because what you say gives credence to some of the other “articles” I thought of as can liners…

    At any rate I think you are more credible than “Toni” 8-)

    TEAM WELL SAID!

    Off to work so as stated before I look forward to reading the comments when I get home.

    Reply
  148. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @ well – I’ve detailed them up there to Too Curious. You said you were definitely going to “go public” with your story that Angelina has harrassed you so seriously that you had to seek therapy. There is no way you could do that unless she had been convicted of that in a criminal court. No newspaper could or would publish it, no broadcaster could or would broadcast it. You can’t make crmininal allegations against someone unless they have been tried and convicted. If you worked in the media you would have known that. Then you said that Angelina definitely reads and comments here. If you knew that you would not discuss your case (if you had one) 1) because it would be telling the defence exactly what you were going to say (that you had sought therapy etc) and 2) because the defence could say (arguably) because you have discussed details of your allegations in a public forum you have prejudiced the trial against her (sub-judice or the equivalent term in the US). Again, there would be no way you could have worked in the media, and esp in PR feeding stories to the press without knowing about that.

    Reply
  149. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    @Canuck:
    It is beautiful and so that is rose in your hair!

    Reply
  150. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    @too curious:
    You “guys” are cracking me up!

    Reply
  151. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    Sugar has the purrtiest eyes I have ever seen.

    Reply
  152. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    I am still expanding my smile library – how did you get smiley with the sunglasses? It is too cute. I am up to three smileys – so can you tell me how you got it? Please….. :-) ;-) :-(

    Reply
  153. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    Sugar has hot legs!

    Reply
  154. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Sugar you have such a nice smile!

    Reply
  155. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    @NoName:
    Unfair, unfair! My boss actually wants me to work – just because he gives me a paycheck….. :-( Ok, be back as soon as possible.

    Reply
  156. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    @Keane:
    Sugar has GREAT THIGHS … :-)

    Reply
  157. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    Sugars boobs are so perky!!! Ha ha.

    Reply
  158. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    wow! those are some posts. this one especially got me:

    TruthTeller Sat, Feb 21, 2009, 1:50 PM

    How about all this venom and hatred here… wow. I read these to see if people know the truth about AJ. Most are still drinking that koolaid, and their denial is made visible by how defensive and hostile they are. I am a Goodwill Ambassador, have spoken at the UN, have worked in Africa, and I live in the center of Hollywood and know far more about these people than I care to. The TRUTH is, AJ is the opposite of the image she portrays. She is a shrewd, conniving, self-deceptive, drug user. There is more drama between her and BP than people realize, (not conjecture–I know people who have worked with them). Their greatest acting job has been this charade they have put forth to the world in some tragic faux-humility, narcissistic, megolamaniac quest for power. The darkest people are never the ones who approach with a weapon… they are the people who will smile and posture goodwill–all for their own gain. AJ/BP are emblematic of our culture in general. Our world is drowning in denial. ”

    Reply
  159. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    @ladybert62:
    What did I do?

    Reply
  160. Helper said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    A person can appear “well” and pain free, if the right meds are taken. … I could smell the marijuana smoke across the street. … Well, (aka Me) is a Brad Helper if not Brad himself. … Interesting psychopathic inversions.

    Reply
  161. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    If I weren’t a lesbian I would marry Sugar for sure!

    Reply
  162. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    @sinker:
    Does anything strike you as odd about it?

    Reply
  163. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    @NoName:
    You did not do anything – my scrooge of a boss wants me to work – I was just complaining in general. You are perfect – JUST LIKE SR IS PERFECT IN ALL RESPECTS BOTH INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL – her beauty is wondrous to behold …… :-)

    Reply
  164. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    @Keane:
    What timezone @ 9:00 pm.

    Reply
  165. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    @ bb – again we are on the same page! It certainly does me. Especially the “I am a UN Goodwill Ambassador living in HW” bit. Correct me if I’m wrong but the only other UN Goodwill Ambassador I know of is Richard Gere, and can you see him posting on The A.T.? Unless him and Ted are good chums…..!

    Reply
  166. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:

    did you try the email (it is. signed, TruthTellerAflame@gmail.com xo ) just curious….

    wonder if this has any tie in: http://www.raceknowledgeproject.org/Home/cultural-workers-unite there is a woman named Amber Flame invovled…

    Reply
  167. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @ bb – I think New York? But I’m not sure if he’s there right now, but he probably posts under NY time anyway I would have thought….

    Reply
  168. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine: . I don’t know who it is. I was tempted to email…. TruthTellerAflame@gmail.com, but was afraid it was a trap.

    Reply
  169. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    Sugar, @ladybert62:
    Aha ha ha. Hey, at least you will find out tonight what is going on in the new post. I won’t find out till tomorrow morning cause it’s almost my bed time (I’m 5 mos. pregnant and tired all the time). Tell your boss to buzz off. ;)
    And yes, SR is the most beautiful person on the planet. She deserves our love and adoration.

    Reply
  170. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @bettieboop:
    yeah.. can’t quite put my finger on it… perhaps some narcissistic overtones in that very post. weird. the “more drama between AJ and BP” part seemed esp. weird.

    Reply
  171. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    @Keane:I never said that. I was thankful for good therapists and strong constitutions. I NEVER said I went into therapy solely because of what she did.

    See? If I were to go public with what happened to me, this is case and point with what would happen to me, how it would be received. Called a liar, making accusations. Just by the nature of it, it would be ugly. And you wonder why I haven’t gone further than this?

    And why would I admit to being Me if I thought this is what it was going to bring me? I thought that the recent postings under ‘well’ made it clear that I wasn’t bs-ing.

    And the supposed ‘allegations’ I’ve made. I have nothing to hide as they’re all true. Her attorneys are well aware of it. Pursuing a judicial process with this would be a losing situation for them and they know it.

    As far as by posting here, giving them the heads up, I don’t think you understand how strong my position is. No offence to Ian, but this is a gossip site. It doesn’t hold much weight in a court of law.

    Reply
  172. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    @bettieboop:
    what are you thinking?

    Reply
  173. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    @Keane:
    Whilst I agree with you in one respect – why would someone be posting on here when they say they know the person they are accusing reads this. BUT surely people do sell their story all the time – look at the NOTW and the like and their kiss and tells / soap star beat me up stories. Usually these have just happened so clearly no-one has been found guilty of anything in a court of law. Obv the kiss and teller could be sued if it was proved they werent tellling the truth, but stories like this happen all the time?

    Reply
  174. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    @well:
    I like your posts.

    Reply
  175. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    @ well – the therapists were not the issue. The problem was you said you were going to go public with something that you could not legally go public with unless Angelina had been convicted of what you are alleging in a court of law. If you were genuinely speaking to a lawyer about this then you would know that. It has nothing to do with you not being believed whatsoever, it has everything to do with the legal conditions under which a story alleging criminal activity against someone can be published. Yours cannot be published under its current conditions, a lawyer would have told you that If you were to go to court with these allegations against Angelina and she was convicted of this then of course you could go public with your story. But if you were intending to do that and had consulted the very good lawyers that you claimed to have consulted they would have told you that in now way should you discuss details of the allegations in any public forum, ESPECIALLY not ones in which you know Angelina is reading and commenting in. Period. If you worked in PR as you said you did, you would have known these elementary libel laws without exception. Period.

    Reply
  176. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @Keane:
    There are other Goodwill Ambassadors…Nicole Kidman, Naomi Watts, Charlize Theron to name a few…not that I see them posting on here but they are HW people

    Reply
  177. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    @Keane:
    Precisely, give me a flipping break.

    Reply
  178. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    @ karenab – this is an allegation of serious criminal activity, much worse than anything anyone has done to me on here (a crime nonethelesss but not as serious). A newspaper or broadcaster would not be able to print/broadcast story alleging that Angelina had harrassed someone in the way “well” has described unless Angelina had been convicted of it in a court of law. Think about for example the recent case against Steven Gerrard that he had hit someone in a club. If he gets convicted of that then the person he hit can come forward and sell their story. But if he isn’t they can’t, and they certainly can’t talk about it now. It is contempt of court on their part (another offence) and libel on the part of the paper/broadcaster. The laws surrounding this are rigidly clear cut.

    Reply
  179. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @sinker:
    The, “I am a UN Goodwill Ambassador living in HW” bit.

    Reply
  180. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    So Sugar Ray – should I refer to you as “he/him” or “she/her” ? Sorry to be dense but such little things in life are not always clear to us older generation ones. Did I tell you have lovely your hair looks today? :-)

    Reply
  181. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    @too curious:
    Nicole, if you are are posting here by any chance, please, please give IAN the scoop on your freaky ex-husband!! :)

    Reply
  182. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    @ too curious – actually there are blimming tonnes of them, I’ve just looked them up. Funny how the only one you ever hear about is AJ!

    @ bb – totally, I don’t think there’s any way anyone of these celebs would post a comment going into such detail about themselves on a gossip blog. There may be a lot of UN ambassadors but they are all pretty famous and wouldn’t want to go into detail about who they are or glorify themselves on a blog. It sounds bogus and I definitely wouldn’t e-mail that addy!

    Reply
  183. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @bettieboop:
    BTW, I agree with you and Keane, I was just naming a few other Goodwill AMbassadors (how is this for being typical of what is wrong with our society today – I found their names on a list of the 10 sexiest UN Goodwill Ambassadors. sheesh!)

    Reply
  184. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    and concerning the evil Ms. Jolie story that originally appeared for today – was this boyfriend of the mom’s that the evil Ms. Jolie seduced, the same one that the evil Ms. Jolie lived with at the tender age of 14 or was this a different one? So many men, so many woman, do you keep them straight in your mind Ms. Jolie? Again, everything I am saying is my opinion for here and evermore about any person, place, thing, idea, expressed or implied, in the past, present or future amen!

    Reply
  185. Guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Movie director: Jolie’s had plastic surgery

    A movie director has told how he turned down sizzling Angelina Jolie as a young unknown -because she was too sexy.

    Italian movie maker Stefano Salvati screen tested the actress for a role in his now long forgotten 1996 musical film Jolly Blu.

    But now he’s revealed how he rejected her for the part because her boobs were too huge and her pouting lips were too sensual.

    The potty producer explained: “I don’t regret my choice.”

    “At that time Jolie was a 20-year-old girl, really thin, with ovesized lips like now, but with rounder cheeks than she has now,” he said in an interview with Italian showbiz magazine ‘Tv Sorrisi e Canzoni’.

    But it was Angelina’s huge boobs that ruled her out for the role, which eventually went to unknown Italian showgirl Alessia Merz who starred opposite singer Max Pezzali.

    And Salvati now believes the girl who went on to become one of the hottest names in Hollywood had some discrete cosmetic surgery following his rejection.

    “Looking at her now, I think she had had some little operations for making her face thinner and her nose too.

    “I think she had a little operation for reducing her boobs too, because at that time they were disproportionate. In the end she was too sexy for that role,” he explained.

    http://www.croatiantimes.com/index.php?id=3760

    Reply
  186. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    10 sexiest UN ambassadors.. dear god… that is sad.

    (sort of related to truthteller’s posts: i do believe that 95% of HW types and a big chunk of “do-gooders” are egomaniacs/narcissists.. not to say they can’t get some great work done. i worked for many non-profits and the heads of 3 of them were seriously self-obsessed; that could include the truthteller…)

    Reply
  187. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    I googled and found articles listing David Beckham and N. Kidman as Goodwill Ambassadors. Also Mia Farrow. Could there be a bunch of them?

    Reply
  188. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    So, what about this post? What boyfriend, Bill? At what age was AJ? Did Voight know about this?
    Thanks to Ian, Sugs, Ms. 9cent and everyone else sick of the bullshit. Do we really want our children looking up to these people. Hell no. JMO

    Reply
  189. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    Testing…

    Reply
  190. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Damn. My avatar didn’t work.

    Reply
  191. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Keane:
    I’ll tell you who I was thinking off when I used that example – ‘Gus’ from EE – sweet sensitive Gus – wasnt there a thing a couple of years ago where he was alleged to have beaten up his g/f? I’m not arguing with you, but dont see how some do seem to do it. And though obv this is a serious allegation, it is ‘only’ harassment – not to belittle it, but I can quite see where no-one could allege she murdered someone – do you see what I mean.
    Maybe give well the benefit of the doubt for now – time will tell, I’m sure. If their story is true, then I think they need our support1

    Reply
  192. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @sinker: . TT say’s they work in HW but doesn’t say they are an actor.

    Reply
  193. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    @NoName:
    So cute! I want to put a pic of my dog up now!!

    Reply
  194. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    @NoName:
    It’s there now!!!

    Reply
  195. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    Oh, there he is.

    Reply
  196. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    @karenab:
    Go ahead. Upload the cutie.

    Reply
  197. Susanna said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    I don’t know about you all, but I am ready to see SR’s blockbuster! Also, I am going to be in NYC next Sun-Wed, so I may just run into one of our cast of characters! I am not sure where Salt is filming – was it Midtown? And I think the Baster is filming in that area too? If I see anything, I will be SURE to fill you all in!

    Reply
  198. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Sugar: I will name my firstborn after you if you give us the info early. At least before I go to bed in an hour or so. After that the deal is off. :)

    Reply
  199. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    @too curious:
    I just did the same & posted the link above. I don’t see him posting on a blog but thought I’d share what I found.
    If by some slim chance it was that would be too cool.

    Reply
  200. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    Sugar, you are the King…AND the Queen!

    Reply
  201. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @Keane:
    Same here Keane, I was going to say something earlier but decided to give Well a chance, something did not shake out for me, and when the fess up of “Me” came I understood why. Sorry..but that whole charade was not a “I heard it through the grapevine” you went to the mat to discredit IAN’s story that day and he and I both agreed on that..I remember it clearly because I rarely call anyone out, and that was probably the one of the first times I did…you seem nice enough, but you don’t even get the names of Brads movies correct.

    Reply
  202. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    And if you like, you can be the Princess too!

    Reply
  203. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    I could even lend you a tiara, if you don’t have one

    Reply
  204. lisa said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    only 199 comments? you’re killing me people! post!

    Reply
  205. Z said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    Posting for SR!!! I haven’ read everyone else’s yet…..but this doesn’t surprise me…AJ has no shame. She’d betray her own mom. Yuck.

    Reply
  206. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    And an evening gown or two

    Reply
  207. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @Canuck:
    You crack me up.

    Reply
  208. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    And some nice sparkly shoes with a matching bag

    Reply
  209. Z said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    @bettieboop:
    Woo Hoo!

    Reply
  210. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

    @NoName:
    If SR hasn’t posted before I go to bed, I might have to try bribing him with an offer to go and buy an pair of Kurt Geiger shoes tomorrow ;)

    Reply
  211. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @Canuck:
    Canuck – stop, you are making me hysterical with laughter. :-) (You have a tiara?)
    Sugar Ray, did I tell you I love you today? No, oops – my bad! I love you and when I think of you I think of this: “To the world you are just one person, but to this one person, you are the world!” Yes, I did steal that line from someone else, but the truth is the truth regardless of who says it !! :-)

    Reply
  212. Z said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @Keane:
    So agree here, Keane. AJ is one woman I would want to stay the hell away from. And want everyone I know to stay away from her, too!

    Reply
  213. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @Canuck:
    Maybe that’ll work. Those shoes are gorgeous.I tried offering my first born. That hasn’t worked. Maybe we should offer him a date along with the lovely gowns and shoes you suggested. Anything to get him to post before bedtime.

    Reply
  214. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    @ karenab – I don’t know about that case, but the newspaper could not have gone to press without hard evidence of it. They would be convicted of libel. Obviously someone like Gus from Eastenders is a lot less fearsome than the mega wealthy, mega famous Jolie. If someone had a story which they didn’t have cast-iron evidence to back up every small allegation they made a paper wouldn’t touch it with a bargepole, no way. And harrassment is a very serious allegation, its criminal, you can go to jail for it and making it against Jolie? No way! There’s no way a paper would run it, it could bring them down. You would have to go to court with it first and obtain a conviction to have any chance of having it reported in the press. You can’t just make allegations like that willy-nilly. And the absolute last thing you could or should do is discuss it on a gossip blog (especially one that you know is read by Angelina!). From what she has said, if it is true, Angelina will know who she is and could sue for what she has said here. Unless she has cast-iron evidence (we’re talking tapes of phone conversations and so on) that she has done all the things she has claimed, the last thing she would do would post it here. If she had consulted a lawyer she would know that, if she worked in the media she would know that. It is ludicrous.

    Reply
  215. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    @ladybert62:
    No, but my 8 year old does, LOL

    Me, I have some antique “bejewelled hair pins/ ornaments that I bought in a souk that are to die for, probably from the 40’s and probably used for a wedding.

    Reply
  216. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Sugar, I will build a shrine in your name that will make the Brangeloonies weep with jealousy.

    Reply
  217. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @NoName:
    No Name – I love your avatar! What is his/her name?

    Reply
  218. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    @NoName:
    I might manage to wangle one with a Columbian painter friend of mine, we have one of his rare female nudes, the rest are guys ;)

    Reply
  219. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @bettieboop:
    Anyone that kisses Teds ass like that is a straight up liar lol because he does not reveal shit. I mean honestly, what does he exactly ever say. jmo

    Reply
  220. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Thanks. His name is Oro. He’s my baby. :)

    Reply
  221. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Sugar, I’ll write your name on a piece of paper and bury it in the sand next to the Pyramids.

    Reply
  222. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @ Canuck – um hello! If we’e talking Kurt Geiger shoes is there anything you would like to bribe me for? I’m trying to think of something I can give you, um, um…..I’ll think of something. Kurt Geiger is, was and always will be my weakness! I wish I could show you some of my recent additions, I think I am developing a fetish! I really do not need any more shoes! Ooh have any of you Brits heard of Brandalley.co.uk? Designer clothes and shoes at discount prices, check it out!

    Reply
  223. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Canuck:
    Yes please, less pretty poetry and more specifics – but I must say you have developed the art of vagueness and hidden meanings to a new high standard! You are looking especially lovely today SR! You are glowing in fact! :-)

    Reply
  224. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Canuck:
    OOOH. Some nice latino fire to go with Sugar’s spark. They’ll burn each other up. LOL

    Reply
  225. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    And if you wait until 9, LA time, I’ll write your name on a piece of paper and put it out for recycling LOL

    Reply
  226. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Canuck:
    Oh my god, that is the best one yet! I am going to get fired because I am laughing so hard at work… :-)

    Reply
  227. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @Keane:
    LOL Thanks for that site. I’m working on developing my “matching shoes and bag” wardrobe, this country is GREAT for that! And yes, I’m running out of closet space too!

    Reply
  228. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    @NoName:
    I’m pretty sure he’d get eaten alive! lol

    Reply
  229. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    Ok so call me a dummie! Kurt Geiger shoes? These are the new hot items in the marketplace? Why – what do they have that my Reeboks dont, pray tell!

    Reply
  230. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @ Canuck – and you love souk goods? Shall we go shopping?! I must say I would not give-up my souk puchases for Sugar Ray, especially not my handmade berber bracelet bought from the only shop in Marrakesh you can’t haggle in. You must go, they have the most amazing ethnic/tribal jewellery (mainly bangles). I was going to spend £100 on one but then I thought, I am supposed to be travelling and roughing it, not blowing money on jewellery, I can do that in London! Lol.

    Reply
  231. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    @Canuck:
    Well, he might like that depending on where the devouring begins. ;)

    Reply
  232. Alif said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @bettieboop:
    Jen is “The Susan Boyle of America”?
    Does D-listed person know what that makes some of us think of him?
    Susan Boyle is not AJ on the outside. Ah, but INSIDE, she is incredibly beautiful!
    Angelina Jolie is somewhat beautiful on the outside, thanks to the surgical kife, But inside; well, you know where this is going. Conclusion: AJ is the reverse of Susan Boyle; and Jen should thank her lucky stars she is not AJ, but somewhat like Susan Boyle. Not hearly, because Jen has ALL-AMERICAN looks, imo!
    All this makes the D-listed guy seem like a poophead!

    Reply
  233. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Ha ha. My husband is brushing my dogs teeth. Just thought I’d share to bump up the posts.

    Reply
  234. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @NoName:
    Have just tried – says it takes 5 – 10 mins?? Will check back after Desperate Housewives !

    Reply
  235. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @ Canuck – oh me too, I am having to buy these super thin hangers to get stuff in my wardrobe, but now I can’t find any more of them. Its a tragedy that makes me cry myself to sleep at night I can tell you!

    Reply
  236. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @karenab:
    Ooohh – its there already ;)

    Reply
  237. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @NoName:
    Does your dog also wear sunglasses? That is the newest thing – they protect him from the evil ultraviolets etc.

    Reply
  238. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    so about this boyfriend that was seduced…
    – bill day, tom bessamra (sp), john trudell??

    Reply
  239. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @ ladybert62 – they’ve been around for a while, check out their webpage. Pricey but good and I tend to get mine in the sale. The cheaper brand by the same company is Carvella, not so good. Kurt Geiger is shoe heaven for me!

    Reply
  240. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    So, just asking, is RAY CATONE going to post where we can understand in absolute terms or is this going to be a riddle? Does anyone know?

    Reply
  241. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @karenab:
    OOH. He is a cutie!!!!!!

    @ladybert62:
    Ha! Nope. But he has been known to smoke a cigarette here and there. And last night I caught him drunk off his ass in the liquor cabinet. He loves a good martini. No olives.

    Reply
  242. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @Keane:
    I adore shopping in the souks. It’s such fun. Sadly, Morocco isn’t one of the places that I’ve been, but that will probably happen one of these days. Want to trade addresses? The purse guy in Istanbul for the bracelet guy in Marrakesh? I’ve got an ongoing collection of “orphaned” silverware too, picked up piece here and there and none of it goes together. How are the auctions here?

    Reply
  243. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    @Keane:
    I know, I’m seriously considering charity shop donations. Can’t get into half of it anyways, since I quit smoking :(

    Reply
  244. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @Kate: . I think he was reporting she was a master (fake) image reshaper and pr master, a beat before everyone else was, wasn’t he? I believe before the Times outed her. True he didn’t report out-right about her smack addiction but was pretty damned explicit — not to mention ruling out everyone but Angelina. He also reported on her bordom with Brad and predicted the end of the relationship due to it’s faultering state. He didn’t provide smoking guns but still…

    Reply
  245. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @sinker:
    Bill DAy, isn’t he the one that wrote the letter to her mom asking about Angelina years later?

    Reply
  246. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    Ok Sugar…how do you feel about chinchilla? lol

    Reply
  247. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @NoName:
    Your dog or your husband or both? :-)

    Reply
  248. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    @ Kate – yeah I would suspect this will be a riddle, let’s hope its not too complicated, I’ve got to go to bed soon anyway. And yes you made a good point about “well”, once she identified herself as “Me” I was like, well that just about says it all doesn’t it?! Plus people who claim to know this level of detail about Brangelina and know them personally are always highly suspect. We haven’t had a genuine one yet and I doubt we ever will!

    Reply
  249. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Sugar I’ll have all the gypsy children sing songs of your glory and bountiful beauty.

    Reply
  250. BS said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    STFU and don’t call this beautiful Lady Angie!
    Ian is full of Bullshit and his sources are non existent.
    You guys really believe that crap?I feel sorry for you.

    Reply
  251. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    @ladybert62:
    LOL. Nah, just my puppy. He is a chainsmoking drunkard. Seriously, this dog likes wine, coffee, tomatoes, you name it. Indulgange is his middle name.

    Reply
  252. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    @BS:
    No one would confuse Sugar Ray for Angie. She’s too beautiful for that, as you pointed out.

    Reply
  253. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    @Kate:
    blah, blah, blah. LOL

    Reply
  254. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    You know, I’d love to be a fly on the wall in Camp Jolie when she she’s the picture of Brad with that necklace. Supposedly, it’s one that Jen gave him for his last birthday. I wonder how she snuck it to him? I wonder if he was wearing it at the Oscars?

    Reply
  255. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    they dated from 1978 to 1993@Kate:

    Reply
  256. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @ Canuck – I will have to go dig it out, I’m pretty sure I’ve still got it. I’ve not yet been to auctions I must say, in London you will not get an bargains, no way. Everything will be pricey which I am not a big fan of! What do you go for, furniture maybe? I’m debating buying some of that in Wimbledon tomorrow. Seen quite a good deal (that’s my M.O. in case you hadn’t noticed!). I put a bag of stuff out for “the third world” today (God that makes me sound like Angelina, apologies but that’s what it said on the flyer!) which now I think of it I better check has been taken. Someone probably nicked it knowing my area! I almost put some old Diesel stuff in and then I thought, no this feels weird, sending semi-designer gear to the third world. I’ll just put the French Connection etc in! God this all sounds terrible, I should have just taken it to the charity shop as usual!

    Reply
  257. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @NoName:
    God, don’t you get sick of hearing about how this woman is so BEAUTIFUL as if that actually means anything other than the superficial?

    Reply
  258. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    @p:
    Ted has been saying the same ole thing for at least 2 years, so how this butt kisser thinks he rocks and calls anyone out is beyond me, and he has always kissed Brads butt. I just don’t see him as a whistle blower.
    I like Ted on a personal basis, but his column, sucks.

    Reply
  259. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    @justhelping:
    Who dated who for 15 years? The mom dated him or the evil Ms. Jolie (she doesnt really “date” anyone does she – she devours them and moves on to the next victim!) :-)

    Reply
  260. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    Only 88 to go and we are at 350! So if we get there before 9:00 (Ian’s time), will the lovely SR gives us the scoop then?

    Reply
  261. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    @Keane:
    Yes, it was too obvious. Not to mention this person is not very familiar with their upcoming projects…say what…lol…

    Reply
  262. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    mom dated bill day. they did documentaries together. it’s funny the AJ & JH never brought him up. he was in their lives for a long time. @ladybert62:

    Reply
  263. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @Canuck:
    Yeah, I think everyone gets sick of it. Personally I think she was better looking before all the surgery. One of my favorite quotes about Angelina was on a blog where they were talking about her magazine photo and they said they couldn’t get rid of her “tar black aura” with photoshop. Ha ha. Love that. And so true. And she was better looking before all the surgery anyway.

    Reply
  264. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @Keane:
    I hate to be cynical, but it’s fairly likely that the designer stuff ends up in some market stall in a third world country, rather than being given away. Still, it’s a nice gesture and whatever makes it is very appreciated.

    Reply
  265. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    Oops. I repeated myself. Should re-read my posts. Sorry.

    Reply
  266. Interplanet JAnet said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    God, this site is addictive. I could spend all day here reading the comments…

    Reply
  267. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    @NoName:
    They caught her aura on film? That would actually be pretty creepy, I imagine it to be like a black hole, a void…

    Reply
  268. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    Are we thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee yet? lol

    Reply
  269. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    @justhelping:
    OK – thanks for the info – still learning a lot about the complicated background of the evil Ms. Jolie.

    Reply
  270. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @Canuck:
    no last count – 83 to go … keep on trucking…. :-)

    Reply
  271. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    You know Sugar, I really meant it about the Pyramids.

    Reply
  272. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    This

    Reply
  273. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Or if you prefer, I can put your name in a little basket and float it down the Nile…

    Reply
  274. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    @Canuck:
    LOL. She just exudes darkness don’t she? A black hole that sucks everything in. Seems to be her M.O.

    Reply
  275. Ray Catone said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    Girlfriends, you have made Sugar feel super sweet. I love ya all!!!! Te Amo!!!!! My gift to you is coming at 6:04 tonight (the digits of Angie’s B-Day).
    Te Amo!!!!!

    Reply
  276. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    Sugar me tengo que ir a dormir. Por favor danos la historia ahora en vez de más tarde. Te amaré el resto de mi vida, cariño.

    Reply
  277. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    is

    Reply
  278. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @ Canuck – yes I’ve just gone and fetched it back in as I noticed it wasn’t collected and just saw we had another leaflet put through our door about stuff wanted to be sold in aid of projects in Africa. I assume they must be legit as they have emails and stuff about how they are. I normally just take stuff to my local charity shops but they are so over subscribed as I live on the edge of a posh area and they aren’t really my pet charities so I like to try to give stuff to other things. I should probably check out what this organisation is though. And yeah I definitely thought I just can’t see this Diesel T-shirt and trousers ending up being worn by someone in the developing world…. it will probably be nabbed by someone long before it gets there!

    Reply
  279. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    OOOh. Goodie.

    Reply
  280. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Kisses – kisses – kisses!! :-)

    Reply
  281. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @Canuck:
    That is bizarre.

    Reply
  282. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    I see, holding out for a belly dancing job, are we?

    Reply
  283. Patty anne said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    Holding my breath for 9 p.m. BUT…is that Eastern Standard Time of Mountain Time ? Okay, i won’t sleep one bit tonight. I hope the “bomb” blows her skanky ass out of the water! For once and for all. It’s nice to see good guys win once Thank you ian

    Reply
  284. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    a

    Reply
  285. Patty anne said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    6:04? Whew! I can last that long…..

    Reply
  286. Patty anne said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    BTW, Star is standing by their report that Angelina is preggers. I wonder who donated sperm this time?

    Reply
  287. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @ SR – hurah for SR, I can catch it before I go to bed and then probably stay awake all night wondering about it!

    @ NoName – spanish is very similar to French isn’t it? I practically understood what you said there and I know zero Spanish. I guess they are both latinate languages….

    Reply
  288. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Woohoo! I’m going to have to get up early now. What time is it in La-La land now anyways?

    Reply
  289. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    So what is 6:04 if you are in the Eastern block of Europe??

    Reply
  290. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Keane:
    I know Wimbledon WELL – I used to live in Southfields!!
    Have you checked out youlovefashion- they list sample sales. There is a good twice yearly one at Chelsea Town Hall with Gina shoes for less than £100! Shoes are my BIG weakness.

    Reply
  291. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Canuck:
    In la la land it is 2:45 p.m. :-)

    Reply
  292. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Keane:
    Yeah, they are pretty similar. Both are latin based. I can read French a little because I can read the Spanish.

    Reply
  293. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Sugar, you are as kind as you are beautiful. Can’t wait!

    Reply
  294. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @ Patty Anne – yes the UK National Enquirer are still going on about the pregnancy and saying she did it to trap Brad. I wonder if Star mean they are standing by the fact that Ange’s PR told them she was preggers as opposed to they know for a fact she is. I mean how would they, have they seen her pregnancy test? Doubt it!

    Reply
  295. Togi said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @well:
    Oh, don’t worry about it darling! Just post like the rest of us. Everyone is welcome to comment!

    Reply
  296. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    test.

    Reply
  297. Jinxy said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    Is this 6.04pm going by the time of the posts?

    Reply
  298. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    It was the Kurt Geiger shoes, wasn’t it Sugar? lol

    Reply
  299. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @karenab:
    Your puppy cracks me up. What’s his/her name?

    Reply
  300. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Maybe she is a hermaphrodite (spelling?) and just donated it from herself to herself? :-)

    Reply
  301. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    WOO HOO!!! 6:04 NY time?

    Reply
  302. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    @karenab:
    It was a sparkly pair of those I was going to lend SR.

    Reply
  303. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Blows her padded ass out of the water.

    Reply
  304. JinxyGal said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    If she is pregnant, who would be the daddy?

    Reply
  305. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @NoName:
    Thanks! He is Milo, a Soft Coated Wheaten Terrier, and he is just over a year old. Our first dog, and we are so pleased we took the plunge!

    Reply
  306. Diplomat said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    Let me tell you an insider story on American politics. There is a woman organization in mid-west (I cannot give you more details b/c i do not want to get them in trouble), who are constantly fighting for women’s rights and to stop domestic abuse against women. The president of that organization, a brilliant, brilliant woman, had a 5 minute appointment with Bush’s lawyer when he was in office. The appointment was about a project that the organization had started to stop violence against women and planned to expand in nation-level but Bush’s approval (and governmental financing) was needed. The lawyer asked the woman if she had any important people supporting this project and she said yes, I have several well-known Harvard and Yale professors, several women-rights activists, several other feminist organizations etc. The lawyer then said: “No, no, what I meant is, do you have the support of important people like Angelina Jolie?” Needless to say, Bush did not approve the project, since Miss Jolie was not suporting it.
    Apparently, we need a high-school drop-out, an uneducated woman, who is only an actress (sth that does not require any intelligence), a woman who has publicly accepted her drug use , we need her support in everything in order for the government to act while every 15 seconds in United States alone a woman is being physically abused by a male who is her family member.
    This is the reason why I am longing to see the destruction of Angelina Jolie- i need every American and the world to see how much importance is put on individuals like her while totally ignoring the real issues. I need the world to see who she really is and how wrong we are to worship these people, who do not care about the world since they are financially set for generations and generations while smart, educated single women are working 3 jobs so that their children can have an education while Miss Jolie is paid $20 million for a movie and a month work.
    At the end, my instinct has told me not to like her, a feeling I have not had for any other actress.

    Reply
  307. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @karenab:
    He is adorable – looks like he wants to be kissed! Is he playing in the snow in the picture?

    Reply
  308. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    @karenab:
    Oh, he’s still a puppy!!! I love them at that age. All spunk.

    Reply
  309. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    We love you darling Sugar Ray! Thanks for all the hard work!!

    Reply
  310. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Canuck:
    Lucky you!! I dont have any sparkly Ginas :(
    But I am like a magpie – I buy these lovely high sparkly shoes, then find I cant walk in the bliddy things!

    Reply
  311. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @ karenab – spooky! I used to live in Earlsfield! Small world hey?! I guess you are categorically not Angelina Jolie then, drat, foiled again! I think I hit the nail on the head with “well” though, unless she’s going to start telling me about her London-based shopping exploits, ha ha! Ooh I don’t know that site but I will check it out. I actually went to a French Connection sample sale not so long ago (first time) and was a bit disappointed. You weren’t allowed to try anything on and there weren’t even any mirrors to hold it up against you to see if it suited you, and it wasn’t even that cheap! My big hunting grounds are TK Maxx (Hammersmith branch particualrly, got some great stuff there, Tommy Hilfiger, Burberry, Nicole Farhi, a brand called Lulu and Red and another called Soli I think it is, super, super cheap, you can’t beat it) and the House of Fraser sale can be pretty good (Kurt Geiger and Pied a Terre shoes – bought one pair for £15! – Diesel jeans for £20-30 – some nice tops for a tenner – bargains!). I have actually been known to spend whole days ringing around branches of shops across the country trying to track stuff down and get it sent to me! Sad I know but I have saved a fortune doing so!

    Reply
  312. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    Kvk… keyboard sticking today?

    Reply
  313. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    What have I missed I haven’t posted for a couple of days?

    Reply
  314. Tamara said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    I was just thinking about the girl rock star, could be Chrissie Hinds. AJ seems to like the tough girls and CH would definitely fit that bill, there were rumors about her and Carmen Electra not too long ago, but haven’t heard anything about them lately. As far as true ROCK goes, she is definitely that, no middle of the road like Aguilera IMO

    Reply
  315. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Sort of – the whole of the UK had feet of snow this year. But here, we only had about an inch and it was gone by lunchtime.

    Reply
  316. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @Jinxy:
    Yes, they are EST

    Reply
  317. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @Tamara:
    I thought the rumors were of Joan Jett with Carmen Electra? It was Chrissie?

    Reply
  318. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    A lot.

    Reply
  319. Patty anne said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    HaHaHa, now that is the most believable thing i’ve read about Jolie yet…..@ladybert62:

    Reply
  320. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes!!

    Reply
  321. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    Can we get to 350 before 6:04 just to let SR know how much we appreciate the hard work & early delivery?

    Reply
  322. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    Oh plus I’ve seen quite a lot of Chloe stuff at TK Maxx, still pretty expensive though….

    Reply
  323. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    @Keane:
    I was in House of Fraser today in Westfield. Not much on sale at the moment, although if you’ve been dying for one of those Herve Leger bandage dresses, they had 4 of them on sale, about 30% off. Biggest size was an 8, looked like a two, LOL

    Reply
  324. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    We’re up to 324 people!!!!!

    Reply
  325. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    I do hope it’s not a difficult riddle.

    Reply
  326. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    @Keane:
    I’m going to have to go down there, my teenager keeps going on about that place.

    Reply
  327. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    @NoName:
    Let’s make SR proud.

    Reply
  328. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    Yep it was defo Joan Jett. I thought Chrissie Hinds was straight, but I guess we’re coming to the conclusion that not too many of these celeb types are…..

    Reply
  329. Becca said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    She’s really messed up isn’t she! I know someone a lot like her who came onto my bf at my own birthday party! She obviously has really bad self esteem issues.

    Reply
  330. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    I am dying of anticipation – the biggest one yet, I think it proclaimed? Yikes – what could it be – 5 minutes to go according to my clock : tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock :-)

    Reply
  331. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    @Keane:
    Appears so.

    Reply
  332. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @bettieboop:
    I’m with you on that.

    Reply
  333. guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @BS:

    http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/angelina-jolie1.jpg

    Reply
  334. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    350 here we come!!

    Reply
  335. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Anticipation

    Reply
  336. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    only 16 to go until 350! almost there ….

    Reply
  337. Togi said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    I’m supposed to be working!!! Darn this site!

    Reply
  338. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Wanted

    Reply
  339. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @too curious:
    Keep going.

    Reply
  340. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    Sugar, ah honey honey

    Reply
  341. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    here is one more … ;-)

    Reply
  342. Togi said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    I think we’ll make the 350 in just moments.

    Reply
  343. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    11 more

    Reply
  344. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    You are my candy girl

    Reply
  345. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @Keane:
    According to wiki Hinds has been married 2 times and had a kid with one of the Kinks. I never heard rumours about her being gay. But like you said…who knows?

    Reply
  346. Susanna said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    So we think the female rock star could be on of the following (or maybe more…Lord knows Angie Jo gets around:

    Joan Jett
    Chrissy H.
    Madonna (SR confirmed this a while back)
    Pink
    Christina A.
    Britney was ruled out by SR, right?
    Katy Perry

    Reply
  347. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    4

    Reply
  348. Togi said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    Who will be the lucky 350?

    Reply
  349. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @ Canuck – oh yeah the Westfield one and the Oxford Street ones are not so good, you need to go for the slightly out of town ones: Richmond, Croydon, Bluewater etc. Then if you see something you like and they don’t have it in your size they will ring round the country to get the right size for you and you can have it sent to you if you have a Frasercard. Its good. But Hammersmith TK Maxx is my top shopping pick, its good for homewares too, I get most stuff from there. Denby crockery, really nice lamps, cushions, cast iron cookware, you name it, they’ve got it, its a treasure trove!

    Reply
  350. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @Togi:
    I know – if I get fired, I am going to have to come live with one of you!

    Reply
  351. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    349!!!!

    Reply
  352. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    My 2 1/2 year old nephew was “singing” Sugar, Sugar and no one has the faintest idea where he heard the song :)

    Reply
  353. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    And Happy New Year!!! LOL

    Reply
  354. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    We did it!

    Reply
  355. Togi said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    Bettiboop, you’re 350! Good job.

    Reply
  356. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    BINGO! 356 and we have still 3 minutes to go….. :-)

    Reply
  357. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    It wasn’t from me as I couldn’t carry a tune in a bucket, but it IS an appropriate way to honor our Sugar today

    Reply
  358. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    So Sugar you gonna spill the beans? Or we gotta wait?

    Reply
  359. Togi said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Well, we have plenty of room if you can stand the long, cold AK winters! :-)

    Reply
  360. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    New Sugar Post.

    Reply
  361. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @Keane:
    I did TRY to tell you I wasnt her! I love TK Maxx. In fact I popped into the Hammersmith one a couple of weeks ago. The Kingston one is really good though. And the Brighton TK Maxx is good – I have seen some really good designer stuff there. I used to work in Shepherds Bush – I couldnt believe it when I saw the old station that is now all new and big and sparkly – have you been to Westfield (is that what its called?) I love a bargain, but I couldnt be arsed ringing round – theres nothing like a good rummage!
    I used to love wandering round Wimbledon Village, but SO expensive. A couple of really good shoe shops though. Then stop off for a drink at The Fire Stables.
    Of course, I could be sitting in the Waldorf googling all these shopping sites and areas :)

    Reply
  362. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Ditto or work for Ian.

    Reply
  363. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    I think I need a diaper.

    Reply
  364. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    @ karenab – yeah, now that would be dedication if you were! I have also been to the Kingston TK Maxx and a whole lot of other ones too, its an addiction!

    Reply
  365. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    @Keane:
    Well, that TK Maxx looks to be walking distance from me, on a nice day. Defo on my list of places to go to, maybe I’ll offer my teenager a mini-shopping spree there for the next bday, and I’ll tag along. :D

    Reply
  366. guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    I must confess I am addicted to this site. Keep up the good work Ms. NineCent, His Highness IAN, Sugar Rae.

    All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

    (Arthur Schopenhauer)

    Reply
  367. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    @guest:
    bb14 Who is she supposed to be pregnant to.? I don’t believe that.

    Reply
  368. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @guest:
    bb14 My god I woulds buy it, but unfortunately Australia doesn’t get these magazines out here.

    Reply
  369. I'm on the bidet said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    Did AJ have ANY positive adult male figures in her life growing up? It certainly doesn’t seem like Jon Voight provided much parenting, and then some dude her mother is dating sleeps with her? Sorry, but no decent man can be seduced by a teenager, I don’t care how ‘voluptuous, horny, devlish’ she may be. The proper response would be shock, revulsion, and then concern that this kid was acting out sexually, and needs serious help, if not from the mother and father then someone else. And no, I’m not making excuses for adult AJ, it just seems like she was much into booze, drugs, and sex in her younger years, and I’m wondering why the hell some responsible adults didn’t step in to help her?

    On a weird side note, Jon Voight’s wikipedia page has just about the most sterile mentions of AJ that one could imagine, i.e. it mentions him as her father and that they were in a movie together once. Where’s the ‘emotionally crippled his daughter’ section? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Voight

    Reply
  370. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:45 pm

    @NoName:
    bb14. I’m in Australia so I won’t get the news till the morning either.

    Reply
  371. rotorua said on May 7th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    @well:
    Dear Well, no matter what anyone else says on this site, I for one am interested in reading your comments. Don’t run away this time!!!

    Reply
  372. Mama San said on May 7th, 2009 at 5:30 am

    Who’s surprised by this newest revelation…..ummm……I’m not.
    I was going on the angle, IMO that she was either molested or raped, in her early years.
    Instead she was playing “LOLITA” with her mama’s meat. Lol, good grief, how old was AJ was this alleged incident happened?
    Mornin’ all.

    Reply
  373. Mama San said on May 7th, 2009 at 5:41 am

    @Susanna:
    I think you and I are both right ,IMO, about her{AJ} either being molested or raped. No child under normal circumstances and upbringing would do this. Nor would they sexualize every relationship in their lives , like she has. There is something more to the mother and daughter relationship that we do not know about. I would also venture to post IMO, that her mom either trained her{AJ}, pimped her out, or a boyfriend of mom molested or raped her. I’m still going with that AJ is amoral and was made this way.
    IMO, I also think her mom was aware of her{AJ} and James getting it on, and dad found out and left the scene,one of the reasons for him calling her out about her issues , the “infamous” kiss at the Oscar’s she laid on her brother, and Mad’s adoption, he was IMO worried. Daddy dearest knows more than he lets on to, and she must have something on him, or why else has he not made a major stink about not seeing his{JV} grandbabies. and after he made that public attempt to get her help, he was shut out, and has made very few public commments about her.
    As always , JMO.

    Reply
  374. Sheriffe said on May 7th, 2009 at 6:08 am

    @benjaminbutton14:
    BB14, you can invariably find scans or text versions of the articles floating about the place – you don’t need to buy them. Plus our magazines like NW and Who Weekly are just local versions with the same content – the sources for the US stories are the very same publishers that put out In Touch and Us Weekly. In some cases, because our mags come out on a Monday we have occasionally had stories come out in the Aussie mags two days before hitting the stands in the USA. The only difference is that we get to have awesome articles about who looked like rubbish at the Logie Awards…

    True facts.

    Reply
  375. bettieboop said on May 7th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @I’m on the bidet:
    After being on this site for awhile it’s my opinion that AJ’s mom may have fed her bullshit about her father to keep her “dear” children all for her. I don’t know that I believe it was Jon.

    Reply
  376. bettieboop said on May 7th, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    @Mama San:
    I totally agree as far as her mom & hers relationship. I think AJ learned her behavior from her mom. I bet a lot went on in the house. AJ can’t critisize mom because she IS her mom. I don’t think AJ has anything on Jon, he doesn’t come out & say anything now because people would ask/wonder why didn’t you do something when they were young. JMO

    Reply
  377. bettieboop said on May 7th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @bettieboop:
    One more thing.
    That’s why IMO that the children are not safe with her.

    Reply
  378. Patty anne said on May 8th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Angie is as crazy as her mother was; angie was saying her twins would be born in France in honor of her mother, Marcheline. BTW, “Marcheline” was born in Illinois, USA as Marcia Lynne. Her grandfather was half French/Canadian. Angie sure blew that out of porpotion didn’t she? Poor Viv, one day she’ll find out she’s named a phony name after all…should be Viveinne Marcia….

    Reply
  379. Z said on May 17th, 2009 at 3:21 am

    @sinker:
    Goodwill Ambassadors:

    * HRH Queen Rania
    * Shakira Mebarak
    * Ishmael Beah
    * Lord Richard Attenborough
    * David Beckham
    * Harry Belafonte
    * Jackie Chan
    * Judy Collins
    * Mia Farrow
    * Danny Glover
    * Whoopi Goldberg
    * Angélique Kidjo
    * Johann Olav Koss
    * Tetsuko Kuroyanagi
    * Femi Kuti
    * Leon Lai
    * Lang Lang
    * Jessica Lange
    * Sir Roger Moore
    * Nana Mouskouri
    * Youssou N’Dour
    * Vanessa Redgrave
    * Sebastião Salgado
    * Susan Sarandon
    * Vendela Thommessen
    * Maxim Vengerov

    Reply
  380. Z said on May 17th, 2009 at 3:28 am

    @Keane:
    Guys, it’s possible! I’m going to e-mail this person. You guys are so cynical! And I thought I was…..; )

    Reply
  381. Z said on May 17th, 2009 at 3:31 am

    @p:
    Yeah…a trap would suck…..but I’m curious.

    Reply
  382. Z said on May 17th, 2009 at 3:39 am

    @bettieboop:
    I know this is an old thread and no one is going to be reading, but, he/she said they were a Goodwill Ambassador…not a UN Goodwill Ambassador.

    Reply
  383. Z said on May 17th, 2009 at 4:08 am

    @NoName:
    LOL…hilarious!

    Reply

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

May 2009
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta