IUC Exclusive: Brad Pitt tells Aniston’s Best Friend “I’m Sorry”

Posted on May 5th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

At a Chris Cornell concert Sunday night at the Wiltern Theater in L.A. Jennifer Aniston’s best friend Courteney Cox had a heart to heart with Brad Pitt.  Pitt, according to a friend of Cox, told Cox and her husband David Arquette that he regrets what happened to him and Jen and that he is still in love with her.  “He poured out all his feeling to Courteney,” the source said.  “He said he made a mess of his life since leaving Jen and that he misses her a lot.  He also said he still loves her.”  Developing…

****UPDATE**** A close friend of Pitt told IUC that Pitt’s parents have urged him for more than a year to leave Angelina and to reunite with Jennifer Aniston.  Developing…

  1. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    Well this is a surprise even though SR has said they have met up..and you have told us of a possible reconcillation, would be nice to see..

    Reply
  2. magnolia said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    @Kate:
    If they did happen to get back together, I can’t even imagine what he’ll need to do to regain her trust. It’ll take a long, long time, I would think. I always thought Jen and him were good together. I think jolie is good with nobody.

    Reply
  3. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    It is being reported by Brazil media that he is down there, something to do with his movie Lost City of Z but I can read Spanish , so after leaving LA he must have headed down to Brazil.

    Reply
  4. Astro said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    Hi IAN…Good Joke!!!…LOL

    Reply
  5. magnolia said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    Ian, I love good news. Keep it coming (please).

    Reply
  6. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    @magnolia:
    If they had the kind of relationship that has been portrayed on here, I can’t imagine it would be too hard. When a couple is bisexual on both sides and are bringing partners in bed to share, they have to expect things to happen..and if Jen knew about his relationship with Angelina and just let it go on for 18 months, there must be more dynamics at play with them that we are not aware of. I could see them getting back together and staying married through out their lives with whatever deal they have between them, and I have said this many times, just as Paul and Joanne did. A good marriage begins and ends with a great friendship, and that is something Brad and Jen always had. Whatever is or isn’t in between , now 4 years later, they are mature enough to figure out how to make it so. I could see them being the ultimate power couple in Hollywood, that everyone loves. jmo

    Reply
  7. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    Who wants to take bets as to when they’ll announce the split and then Brad/Jen’s reconciliation?
    I say:
    Brad and Angie will announce split before Thanksgiving/Christmas holidays.
    Brad and Jen will be back together by Valentine’s Day 2010.

    Reply
  8. g said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    @magnolia:
    “made a mess of his life since leaving Jen”
    Well that’s for sure!!

    Agree, Magnolia. It will take time and with both their movie commitments and his commitment to his children it is not going to be easy. Can’t say I’m thrilled about JA being dragged into this mess he’s made of his life. I do think she is probably one of the few who could bring him back to life and provide some sanity in this mess but I truly don’t wish it on her. Her life would be so much easier if she just moved on.
    I wonder what the custody arrangement is (assuming it’s been worked out)

    This is going to be interesting.

    Reply
  9. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    Apologizing to the friends is how it starts…..
    He better publicly apologize to Jen for the smear campaign against her.

    Reply
  10. bettieboop8 said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    @Kate:
    Well said Kate. They could be a HW powerhouse couple.

    Reply
  11. bettieboop8 said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    @g:
    Let’s pray he gets full custody of the bio kids. Not that I’m not concerned about the others but that is probably a whole nother story.

    Reply
  12. ml said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    honestly? so he’s fathering every child but his own, in love with someone in DC and the “Sudanese”, and oh yeah, telling his ex-wife’s best friend he’s still in love with her. And you bel.ieve it all unquestioningly? But the bit about f-ing things up by going with AJ? That indeed is highly credible. Of course you dont need “a close personal friend” of anyone’s to figure that out.

    Reply
  13. ml said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    @Kate:
    so we believe JA is bi? Ok what about the gossip a few weeks before that, that she was pretty much asexual/disinterested in sex (more believable actually). Short term memory theatre presents…

    Reply
  14. ml said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    least believable part? Anyone at a chris cornell concert let alone two celebs.

    Reply
  15. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    @ml:
    LOL… that’s messed up. Chris Cornell ain’t bad, but I heard the new CD wasn’t very good. Haven’t heard it though.

    Reply
  16. magnolia said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:46 pm

    @Kate:
    You’re probably right, Kate, but I think he took it farther than she ever signed on for when he went public with jolie and pretty much rubbed her nose in it. Then to make matters worse, he did nothing when jolie was poking at her, poking at her. He’s got alot to answer for as far as I’m concerned, which is not at all since I’m not Jen. lol

    Reply
  17. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    @ml:
    I have never believed Jen was asexual. Jen started out on stage in New York in biesexual roles, something many are not aware of, I knew that, just never mentioned it because it upsets people. I also knew that her and Brad had some very raunchy sex , so , no, asexual she was not. Not when she was married to him the first few years. Now did she at some point lose interest , IDK…but she has always loved him, and from what I have always been told, she did not want to be with other guys, only Brad over these past four years. I adore Jen, but Jen has cried in her soup all over town for years ….about Bradley..everyone knows thhis.

    Reply
  18. bluiznsmilez said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    1.) who is Chris Connell never heard of him.
    2.) BP and JA back together—don’t want to see it. He treated her horribly and her self image and self respect should be more than to get back with him.
    3.) Raise 3 of Angelina’s babies—wouldn’t that be a coup on Angies Part. She’d still be in Brads life as the baby’s Mama AND dictating vistation blah blah starring in her action films and being a UN embarrassment all the while Jen is saddled with her kids? No fricken way do I want that for her. Unless Will is going to be a stay at home Dad and raise his own darn kids. JMO.

    Reply
  19. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    @bluiznsmilez:
    Chris Cornell was the lead singer for Soundgarden and Audioslave. He’s gone solo for now.

    Agree on all your points.

    Reply
  20. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    IAN, if Brads parents have been urging him for over a year to reunite with Jen I presume that had to be either before Angelina got pregnant with the twins, and then resumed after she had them, is he open to it, and do you see this happening sooner than you thought last week based on these new developments, and is she open to it?

    Reply
  21. Putznasher said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    Don’t believe a word of this garbage, but its amusing to read.

    Reply
  22. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:21 pm

    @bluiznsmilez:
    On the other hand, Jen and Brad could go on to have a happy and healthy loving family life raisng a few kids while she drools and drivels screwing all of Manhattan and her brother and flees to Cambodia with the adopted one.s ya never know. Jen loves him, why would you want her to walk away from someone she loves if they are both willing to work it out? Not sure I quite get that concept, you guys do not believe in forgiveness and second chances? Jane and Bill would embrace her.

    Reply
  23. Mama San said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    Hi all, I just found this site last night on AJ. I’m posting the link, I know it’s off topic on this post, but I found it very interesting that this owner of this site has such an array of political themed photo’s of AJ. She gets around in these circles. Several of the photo’ groups are of her attending world conferences, dinners, gala’s etc. What gets me is , how the H-E- Double hockey sticks did this chick get to the political status she has risen too, and since when do world leaders listen to a flippin’ actress and get her advice on world matters? Just food for thought, peeps. Any thoughts.
    Oh and by the by, I do hope the about post is true. It seems to me, that BP is missing the good ol’ days he had with his real friends and wifey, JMO. I have never heard a bad word about the DA&CC, they seem to be the real deal.
    @Keanne, thank you for the run down of UK papers, I like to broaden my reading materials, and like to keep the junk to a minimal , I appreciate it.
    http://angiejolie.free.fr/eng/unhcr06.htm#haitian

    Reply
  24. Mama San said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    @Mama San:
    Oh JMO, I think Angelina and Wyclef had a thing going, check out some of the pic’s of them together, on the link.
    I can’t remember the site that the rumor circulated on, if I find it I’ll post it.

    Reply
  25. Putznasher said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    @Mama San:

    If world leaders really are listening to this ballooned lip twit then we’re all screwed.

    Reply
  26. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    @Putznasher:
    That is your right, but we do not need a mediator here on what we should or should not believe. Thanks anyway, not sure why you felt the need to plead..everyone makes up their on mind, and I believe…

    Reply
  27. Mama San said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    @Putznasher:
    I would have to think that by the photographic evidence ,that fact that she is even invited to these events and conferences is enough to make my stomach turn. On some level I really don’t think they had her in there as just “eye candy”, she’s a commodity that could possible bring those types of organizations money for their causes, whoever is behind them. But I ask whose side is she really on if we are to believe “Guest” and their experience with the Jolie-Pitts in Vietnam, in which I do believe them. That would be the only reason as to why I could picture her presense at these functions.

    Reply
  28. Mama San said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    http://angiejolie.free.fr/images/unhcr/wyclef-11.jpg

    Reply
  29. lila said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:38 pm

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaargh, this is so frustrating!! It’s like feeding crumbs to a starving person :) Whatever plays out, it’s going to have to go down this year, before awards season starts… If it ever does end up happening..

    Reply
  30. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    @Mama San:
    I have listened to some of her interviews with these people , is it to behole, they totally kiss her ass, one has to wonder if they are waiting for a blow job in return.

    Reply
  31. Putznasher said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    @Kate:

    I wasn’t attacking anyone for anything just stating my opinion so get over yourself.

    Reply
  32. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    @lila:
    I agree lili, I can not imagine this going all the way to the beginning of 2010, what is there to gain? Too many people are aware of it. Jolie is blowing Clinton and she is the whore of Manhattan and Brad is zipping all of the damn place, people are yapping about his custody battle and nay a word from them about it. If they show up at Cannes as though nothing is wrong they are going to look incredibly desperate and stupid. Brad’s movie is basically the only American movie going there except that last one for Heath I believe, so it is not as though he has huge competition. Making a good show at Cannes guarantees nothing really..look how it played out in the past years for him..starts next Wed, if he is in Brazil now he has time to jet home and grab the fam as SR said he was going to. I heard Clinto will be there hosting something with Sharon Stone, bet she gives Jolie a run..lol

    Reply
  33. Kate said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:59 pm

    @Putznasher:
    I did not suggest you were attacking anyone, but to come on IAN’s blog and ask people not to believe a story he has just posted I find a little offensive, it is fine if you yourself have doubts, I just thought that was a bit unusual to ask others not to believe…jmo

    Reply
  34. jeannie said on May 5th, 2009 at 10:59 pm

    He was probably drunk when he ran into Courtney and said that stuff. Just because he “still loves her” does not mean he is in love with Jen. I love one of my exes still but am not and never was in love with him nor would I ever reunite with him in a relationship. Courtney looks beautiful in that pic.

    Reply
  35. Ani said on May 5th, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    so is this the first time these two have spoken since the JA/BP break up or is it the first time since he’s wised up?

    …and @Kate: ..ITA. even when they announced it i felt like it wasn’t as clear cut as they wanted it to be, and that something still lingered. jmo.

    Reply
  36. Hmmm said on May 5th, 2009 at 11:14 pm

    Run Jen run! That’s what FF has been saying.

    Reply
  37. Z said on May 5th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @Mama San:
    Hey Mama, is this stuff recent? I hope to hell not. Outrageous imo!! I just can’t stand that woman…what a fake!

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    I completely agree here!!!!

    Reply
  38. too curious said on May 5th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @Mama San:
    Do you know what thread “Guest” talked about Vietnam experience with the Jolie-Pitts? I missed that one.

    Reply
  39. BigApplette said on May 5th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    I think Jen should just stay friends with Brad. Why would she want to reunite with him. It would never work out because there is no trust and too much water under the bridge. I could see constant arguments and all the hurt continuously resurfacing. It would take someone with extreme patience and other wordly understanding to make another go at things in light of all that has transpired.

    Reply
  40. benjaminbutton14 said on May 5th, 2009 at 11:29 pm

    @jeannie:
    Benjaminbutton14.

    The friend of cox told cox and her husband David that Brad was still in love with jen. I hope they do get back together. They would make the perfect couple sure there would be problems to iron out but I think they could handle that.
    Jane and Bill Pitt have always wanted Brad to go back to Jen, now maybe it will happen I hope so.

    Reply
  41. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 5th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

    Any who would actually fall for Jen and Brad 2.0 would be beyond stupid in my opinion.

    Reply
  42. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:01 am

    BJ 2.0 would prove to me in fact both JA and BA were both gay. It would also prove to me that JA was the worst media whore if she’d be willing to play pretend mommy and pretend wifey just for fame. SICK.

    Reply
  43. carrie said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:33 am

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:Agreed. Brad and Jen both can survive all of this, but not AJ. If Brad and Jen reunite it will kill both of their careers. People would be done with them for all of this crap. They can be friends, but I don’t think they public would like it if they got back together. They should both just stand by, let the wolves devour AJ and move on from this stupid triangle for good.

    Reply
  44. Heidi said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:56 am

    Who is FF?

    @Hmmm:

    Reply
  45. azzy said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:58 am

    http://elpasotimes.typepad.com/ent/2007/03/the_official_i_/comments/page/2/#comments

    Hi My name is Atiana, I am a 22 Swedish girl doing aid work in Vietnam and have been for the past 4 years. I got involved with this via my parents who unfortunatly died in Cambodia 2 years ago. I have a deep passion of human rights and am very humbled by the Cambodian and Vietnamese people. Last year I was living in Saigon and I actually got to meet Brad and Angelina whilst they were on their visit there. They seemed like a really nice couple however…..i was saddened to know in my heart it was all an act as I sat there asking myself…what the f.u.c.k are all us free aid workers doing here when u guys come in throw some cash around, stay in your five star security protected hotel (sorry, but in vietnam NO ONE knows you) and their big entourage of security knocking locals out of the way it was f.u.c.k.i.n.g disgusting…they didn’t sleep in the compounds or live with any of us or the vietnamese people. they didn’t join in the activities that we were welcoming too instead opting to take a huge boat out on the water for the day and come back at night for the traditional dinner they were being offered. The ONLY time i saw them do ANY kind of “dirty” work was when my oh my – the papparazzi showed up! f.u.c.k off..sorry for the language but u should be able to understand my frustration at seeing papparazzi in Vietnam….funny how they knew when to show up at the right moment of miss jole and mr pit holding a poor viet kid with a let blown off..spare me. why don’t you come here miss jolie…stop taking the kids off their parents and instead pump your billions and billions of dollars into infrastructure and new orphanagies so that these babies can stay with their parents..why do you have to take them from their culture to ruin them with hollywood…why don’t you stop your ACTING job and come and live here with us aid workers..right now im sitting in 50 degree heat with feaces and flies everywhere…but today we have band aids – if you get bitten at leat we can cover it away from the flies…you like the sound of that huh? my email is atiana@mac.com if anyone intersted..thanks for reading..
    Pi$$ed of in veitnam,
    Atiana
    and ps…if u were wondering….yes, she wears the pants…this guy gets dragged around like a trophey and i swear to god…never questions her or her motives and just kind of stand their and aggreess with her…he has absolutly NO knowledge of third world issues or the cultures and the reasoining behind why vietnam or cambodia can not be fixed overnight….she def does all the talking and even repremandes him for his ignorance in front of other people…na na na na na…..so b9tchy but i am sick of these celebs geting the praise for what people i know are truely dying for going unnoticed everyday working 24 hours everyday no sleep, no food, running from explosions, refugee camps getting burnt or shut or shot down…..argh.

    Posted by: Atiana Packer | September 16, 2007 at 12:50 PM

    Reply
  46. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:05 am

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    Who is BA?

    Reply
  47. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:18 am

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    Just how would that be any sort of “proof”?

    Reply
  48. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    Dear God he’s going to have to fly all over fucking the map just to keep up with his growing brood and all their mamas. There’s the six that are already here, not to mention, at least one, maybe two more. And that one in France also believes he loves her, (and if he lead her on, he’s a piece of shit, in that case who cares what he does anyway — and if he didn’t that’s just one more sitz).

    If half this stuff is true than he’s a user, and whatever he says to anyone, drunk or sober, should be taken with a grain of salt. In fact he sounds so out of it, he must be living in sound bites. I’ve known people for whom what is true is only be true for the moment they say it’s true. They’re frustrating at best, a nightmare at worst. Add to it the DC broad and you’re looking at intermitent crushes thrown in, on top of two, maybe three baby mamas, seven, maybe eight bambinos. Then there’s the bi lovers, who he’s going for it big-time now and there’ll be no stopping him. The guy’s gonna have a fucking heart attack!

    Maybe if Brangelina split, Jen will relax and find a guy who can love her completely. Sometimes a fixation is spawned from someone’s own insecurity. And looking at the BIG picture it sounds like Pittster is grasping at straws all over the place — familiarity being too easy a default. Desperation is rarely a great indicator of where someone lives, at least in my experience.

    Reply
  49. ffleur said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    I did not know Paul N and Joanna W ever split up then reunited with their own rules. I knew each had been married before and at least one (him) had a child and they met on a movie set, had an affair and then were together for the next 50 years.

    But I do know Natalie Wood and Robert Wagner were married young, divorced and then years later reunited, married and remained together until her death.

    I suppose it could happen with JA and BP but the article does not say they are uniting, just that BP has regrets. He could split with AJ but not get back with JA. Guess we will just have to see what happens. Regardless, its good to see this drama finally coming to an end. All just my opinion.

    Reply
  50. carrie said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    @p: Agreed on everything. I think it’s been quite hard for Jen to find a new relationship under the glare and with Pitt and his slut babymama in the background. I honetly can’t imagine how Pitt or Jolie will find new partners who interested in anything other then publicity given the baggage they will be carrying around, including each other. Especially Brad via Jolie. I think it is possible that Brad is just living in abject misery and the last time he remembers being happy and having a peaceful stable live was with Jen so he’s pining over the past. Typical move for a man who has come out of a midlife crisis, which I believe he had.

    Reply
  51. carrie said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:38 am

    @ffleur:I think the best punishment for Brad would be to realize that he messed up too bad to get back with Jen. Too much drama and mistaked on his part. Jen would bring him love, stability and popularity. He would bring her a bunch of kids that aren’t hers (or his), more media scrutiny, drama and a crazy ass babymama. Hell, he’s not even hot anymore. She still looks young and sexy and he looks old and tired.

    Reply
  52. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:46 am

    @carrie: . I seen that a bazillion times. Everyone they’re with is the lucky recipient of…. “This is/was SOOOO much better than what I have now.” Until they get their mojo back, that is.

    Reply
  53. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:47 am

    Is it possible that Brad is doing this so he can be liked again? He knows being seen with Jen (even just as friends) will make him look like a good guy again. If and when he breaks up with Angie his relationship with Aniston could be his new publicity campaign. He could just be trying to use her love for him to his own advantage and then throw her away again. Don’t know. Just a thought.

    Reply
  54. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:02 am

    @NoName: . It’s possible it was a calculated meeting, but then again, if you’ve been following this the last month, Brad has been so erratic, spreading himsself thin physically and emotionally, between a crush, additional pregnancy(s), gay lovers, straight lovers, strippers, walking out, and adoption plans…. that some genuine nosalgsia thrown in woulnd’t surprise me….especially since I get the impression he doesn’t have much of a social life, of the non sexual variety, w Jolie. Then again I suppose it could be for publicity.

    Reply
  55. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:13 am

    @p:
    Oh, I’ve been following. And I can see him still caring about Jen as a friend (they have both said this) and wanting back the good old days. I can see him still loving her. But everything he has done in the last four years has been done for media manipulation. And he has learned from the best. I can see them being friends with benefits behind the curtain. But I can’t help but think that if he is seen out and about with her, romantically or not, there could be another purpose than just nostalgia. Publicity is just one of the things he would get out of it. He would get back into the good graces with his parents and a lot of people he burned along the way simply because Aniston is popular in Hollywood. If she gives him a second chance others may follow suit. Forgive my rambling. To put it simply I think his motives may be a lot more self serving and complicated than simply going back to the woman he loves for comfort.

    Reply
  56. carrie said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:15 am

    @NoName:It’s definitely possible. Brad knows he isn’t liked by the public like he was when he was with Jen and he wants that back bad. I was really hoping that Jen would be married by the time the inevitable break up occured. At least then she would have someone to beat Brad’s ass when he came sniffing around again. LOL!

    Reply
  57. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:26 am

    @NoName: . Don’t you think he is in the good graces of Hollywood though? I mean look at the films he gets to work on, not to mantion the amount of offers he gets (take a look at his IMDB page it’s friggin’ astonishing). But you’re right it could be publicity machinations that could benefit both of them. Aniston has done a lot of chick-flicks but nothing of real substance. I can see her getting better parts via Pitt. And Aniston is pretty media friendly also. But they’ve both said they havae regard for one another. The thing is with all this machinery going 24/5, I can’t help but think quality time with the kids is suffering (and I’m not confusing the PR set-up shots with genuine quality time).

    Reply
  58. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:28 am

    @carrie:
    Ha ha. I think everyone would have loved her to be married and settled by the time Brad came to his senses. If what Kate says is true and she is still in love with him and wants him back that badly she is screwed. I can see him taking advantage of that. Who knows? Maybe his motives are on the up and up. But I don’t trust him and it would suck to watch Aniston get screwed with again. I thought they made a great couple and thought they were made for each other. Maybe they still are. And yeah, it would be romantic and awesome if they got back together. However, he brings a lot of baggage. Only time will tell with this one.

    Reply
  59. Deeca said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:38 am

    LOL!

    Perez mentioned this in his blog.

    http://perezhilton.com/

    Reply
  60. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:42 am

    @p:
    I see where you’re coming from. I honestly don’t know. I guess my distrust of the guy is taking over my romantic inclination. According to a lot of what I read over on FF he is being laughed at in Hollywood and most of his new films are via the same people (can’t remember the guys name). Pitt has been getting Angie work through his production company and partner. Something like that. Maybe I misinterpreted.
    But good graces, the way I mean it, is different than what you are saying. He can get parts but that’s business. But he has lost a lot of respect and friends. We never see him with anyone. And I am basing this on what people on forums say. I think he would like to have his friends back and not be a laughing stocsk. Credibility. I remember when Kathy Bates was asked about Angelina not getting nominated for an oscar for a Mighty Heart and she said something like “your kidding, right?”. At the oscars. That says a lot to me.
    Sure, Aniston can benefit from being with Pitt again in the movie department. But she’s good at comedy and doesn’t necessarily have to move away from that. I like her movies. And she is having no trouble getting parts. So she doesn’t need him in the way Angelina did when they got together.
    As for the kids. To tell you the truth. If the nannies treat them right and they are happy with them then I don’t really worry if they are with their parents or not. Their parents bring a lot of drama with them. What kids need that? In all the photos I have seen of them together the kids can’t wait to get away from them. Maybe after all this crap is over with and things have settled down they can both be better parents and what time they do spend with the kids will be happy.

    Reply
  61. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:43 am

    @NoName:
    True time will tell, one this is for sure though,as Jen has said, it is her life a d no one had to like it, and if they bitch about it, who pissed in their wheatied LOL, and she has a point. She is the one living it, not us and it does not matter what we think she is going to do what makes her happy , as she should , as we all would.

    Reply
  62. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:48 am

    @Kate:
    Ha ha. She said that? She always had a way with words. I agree. I always say whatever makes you happy as long as you don’t hurt anyone else. But it’s fun to speculate and gossip. These three sure do know how to keep the gossip rags busy and fun I will say that.

    Reply
  63. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:55 am

    Someone over at FF posted this. Looks interesting.

    “If this JJ poster is on the up and up, we should have pics of Pitt’s LA escapades by tomorrow.

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/04/30 … /#comments

    Kelia @ 05/04/2009 at 6:37 pm

    My boyfriend works at People magazine and today he told me that tomorrow a huge story is hitting the web that involves Brad Pitt. He has a buddy over at Us weekly and he send him a copy of their lastest edition.

    Us Weekly cover reads: BRAD’S WILD WEEKEND.

    They bought pics of Brad at some stripclub with a couple of girls all over him. He has a huge grin and his arm is grabbing one of her legs.

    According to US story Brad arrived in L.A thursday night and went straight to a hotel. Then he met with his friends and went to this place friday night.

    They called it a night of hardcore drinking (according to them he had to be carried from the club by his security) and lapdances.

    Anyway they had 10 pictures. Then on saturday he was supposed to flight to vegas with his friends for the Hatton-Paquiao fight but at last minute changed plans. According to the MGM he had reservations for that night.
    Saturday night they went to the chateau marmont and rented a bungalow. Story follows that about 2am the group went to the pool and stayed there ultim 5am drinking and jumping into the pool the group included a bunch of young models.

    The pics are great quality and He looks like he is having the time of his life. Us will publish the story tomorrow night.

    Judging from the pics, someone from the group he was with had to sell them to us, there is no other way.

    Janice Min says she does not pay for stories but word in the office is that she paid 300,000 for the story and pics.
    My boy says that something is fishy because they contacted the west coast editor of us sunday afternoon. This deal was made super fast he thinks Brad was set up. According to him Brad is in L.A because one of his best friends is getting married and he was the one in charged of the bachelor party. Today his boss tried to get a hold of Brad’s camp so People wendsday morning will have the other side of the story and they told him that. Brad can’t stop the magazine from publish those pics at this point. According to what his boss told him Brad is supposed to get back to NYC tomorrow.”

    Reply
  64. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:58 am

    @NoName:
    His parents sat him down and made it clear they wanted Jen back in the family,but they would support whatever decision he made. Here they are splitting. If he and Jen reconcile does anyone really believe that Brad would or could use her for anything under the umbrella of his parents? They love her and if they reunite it is because they have matured enough to work through all the demons. Who knows what will happen but it seems they have met on several occasions now and been talking on the phone for awhile.

    As for the Sudanese girl that is a mystery yes if that is Brad, does not sound like he is madly in love with her to me, but then she was rumored to be suing him so….

    The other pregnant girl… Wondering if there was ever definite confirmation on that…

    Reply
  65. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:05 am

    @NoName:
    Brad Pitt is never set up, this is probably his way of breaking it to the world that he and ho go are j
    Kaput. Just like when those Africa pics came out of him on the beach with go and son, that was no accident, but hey it worked didn’t it?

    Reply
  66. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:10 am

    @NoName:
    So that report that Brad went to Brazil was wrong then?

    Reply
  67. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:12 am

    @Kate:
    Kate, I honestly hope if they get back together that what you are saying is true. And yeah, I would love to see them back together. It would be the ultimate Hollywood love story. I mean, they glowed when they were together. Although the triangle would never end then because he would always be linked with Angelina. And stories of mistrust and crap would follow them forever. I just can’t be as certain as you are that his motives are 100% honest. If they do get back together, he cleans up his act and they last then I’ll start to believe he is on the up and up. Until then I hold my reservations. That’s not to say that if he does have ulterior motives and gets back with her he won’t change his mind and then his motives become completely honest (I hope that made sense).
    The link I posted from FF. Looks like the gals there debunked it. Too bad. Would have been juicy.

    Reply
  68. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:15 am

    @NoName: . Wow in a way that’s fucked up bc the clubs are NOT supposed to allow cameras. Someone in security will be out of a job and a manager…heads will roll! Now as for the Chateau, do they mean they have pics there as well??? Then someone really did set him up. This will be an embarassment to both of them IF it’s true. Could be someone having a joke.

    Reply
  69. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    @Kate:
    According to this site: http://www.jornadaonline.com/Tiempo%20Libre/27764-Brad-Pitt-pasea-por-el-Mato-Grosso
    (not going to translate, just summarize)
    Brad is in Bonito, Mato Grosso do Sul, being a turist and official said. He’s saying in hotel Zagaia. Hes filming scenes for his film “the lost city of Z” directed by james gray, in Cuiabá, mato Grosso and went there to get a lay of the land. He went without his wife and kids.

    And here’s the link to another story about Brazil. http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/46939/brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-moving-to-brazil

    Reply
  70. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:20 am

    @NoName:
    ah because the Mayor if some city in SA said he was there and doing some work for Lost City of Z

    Reply
  71. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:20 am

    @p:
    It would be juicy IF (as you say) true. The ladies at FF said that they went to the US site and looked at the new covers and there was nothing about his so it must not be true.
    I think whoever wrote that was implying that someone in the entourage was taking photos without his knowledge as he was supposed to be amongst friends.
    For now looks like it’s not true be we can hope it is. Ha ha.

    Reply
  72. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:23 am

    @NoName:
    Well IAN has a breaking story on them tomorrow, wonder if it is the sex tape LOL

    Reply
  73. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:26 am

    @Kate:
    Basically. It didn’t say the mayor. “municipio” which would be municipality. And it said an official communication by the municipality stated that.

    Reply
  74. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:28 am

    @Kate:
    Knowing IAN it will be juicy. I hope that sex tape story does come out. I could use a good laugh.

    Reply
  75. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:31 am

    @NoName: . Lot’s of actors work with the same directors (Depp, Bale) that’s not really a bad thing. However I think Aniston is being put down for her choices, I don’t deny her films have a market but they haven’t garnered her much respect (and I realize she may not care so long as they’re getting an audience), so I wouldn’t mind seeing her stretch. Brangelina has had far greater opporutunities imo.

    And believe me I’m not romantic about this at all. I’d love to see Jen w a guy who thinks she’s a rare and exciting gift, not just a real sweetheart. I don’t put a lot of weight on a story here, a story there, unless it’s open to very little interpretation.

    Yea it don’t suprise me a bit that, that story was debunked. That club would lose a shit-load of dosh if there was a smoking gun like that.

    Reply
  76. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:32 am

    What’s funny about the spanish link saying he is in South America is that the paper is from Argentina. And Mato Grosso is in Brazil. Might not mean anything.

    Reply
  77. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:39 am

    Yeah that would be something if the sex tape was splashed all over the internet.

    Reply
  78. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:46 am

    @p:
    Oh, I wasn’t saying it was bad to work with the same directors. That’s awesome. Depp and Burton make a killer team. What people on FF were implying was that a lot of his work was for the same production company. They were implying that his friend/partner were keeping him and Angie in movies, basically. Or producing them himself. Which is fine. Unless they go broke cause his latest movies have been flops.

    I know everyone says they wish Aniston did more versatile roles. But in my book it’s not bad she stays in comedy or light movies. I mean Mel Brooks stayed in comedy and that wasn’t a problem. Comedy is hard. You can’t really learn comedic timing and that girl has it in spades. But I would like to see her in some serious roles, sure. She was great in the Good Girl and Derailed.

    Reply
  79. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:50 am

    I guess he is in Brazil

    “Campo Grande (Brazil) (dpa) – The U.S. star Brad Pitt, who is in Brazil filming for the movie “The Lost City of Z” (The lost city of Z), today visited the town of Bonito, which is considered as one of the most beautiful in Brazil.

    According to the mayor of the city, Pitt arrived without his wife Angelina Jolie and children of both, and spent the day trips to the Río de la Plata and know the loopholes and cascades of ecological paradise located in the Pantanal region ( Chaco) the state of Mato Grosso do Sul

    In a press release posted on its website, the council added that the actor – “the biggest celebrity to visit the cinema Bonito” – was scheduled to have dinner today at the Hotel Zagaia where it remains lodged.

    Pitt, 45, bought the film rights to the book “The Lost City of Z-A Tale of Deadly Obsession in the Amazon, based on the true story of British spy and soldier Percy Fawcett, who disappeared with her child in the state Brazil’s Mato Grosso in 1925, when looking for a lost civilization called “Z”

    Reply
  80. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:52 am

    Well ladies it was nice talking to you but it’s almost noon and I must go to the market. Have a good day/night wherever you may be.

    Reply
  81. d said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:46 am

    well according to my source it went like this:

    According to the NY Post, this past Sunday night at the Chris Cornell concert here in LA, Courteney Cox and David Arquette were backstage when Brad Pitt showed up. Courteney and Brad spent the rest of the evening talking. When she got home, I’m sure Courteney called Jen.

    Jen – (loud inhaling sound) Hello.
    Courteney – You will never guess who I just talked to for 2 hours
    Jen- Who?
    Courteney – Brad
    Jen – Brad? As in my Brad?
    Courteney -Yep
    Jen – Did he look good? Was the shrew there?
    Courteney – He looked ok and no, she wasn’t there.
    Jen – Did he ask about me? You told him I was single right?
    Courteney – Sure he asked about you
    Jen – What did he say exactly? I want to know. Does he think of me and miss me? Does he call me and hang up like I do to him? Does he know I only slept with all these guys to make him jealous?
    Courteney – He asked how you were doing and where you were tonight?
    Jen – Did he sound like he meant it? How come you didn’t call me? OMG, I could have come over. I don’t know what I would have worn. I mean I could go with the jeans and a t-shirt thing, but, then after all this time it might have been better if he saw me in something else. Oh God, what would I have worn. I mean a dress can be casual, but he also might think I was trying too hard. I don’t want to look desperate. Hang on I have to light this bong again. So, he asked about me? Did you tell him I looked good? I do look good don’t I? Hello? Courteney? Are you still there? She must have hung up. Damn this bong. I need a new one.

    LOL

    Reply
  82. BigApplette said on May 6th, 2009 at 6:18 am

    James Hoven: Hello, Angie. It’s James. What are you wearing, baby?
    Angie: Just your saliva on my body. Where are you?
    James: I’m still in heaven with my memories of you and me fresh in my mind.
    Angie: Oh, baby. I would love to suck your blood some more. I’m so in love with you right now.
    James: Me too, baby. Listen, baby, have to let you know, your personal valet and nanny was seen talking to “X”’s best friend. See, baby, I remembered never to mention her name, like you told me.
    Angie. Oh, really?! Where did you hear that? Did you leak that to the tabloids or did I?
    James: No, baby, it is true. What should we do? We don’t want Mr. Valet/Nanny out of our clutches. He is too valuable to us. Where would you get “serious” and “Oscar worthy” film roles and someone to babysit?
    Angie: Get me People Magazine on the phone. Stat. How does this sound?: Tell them “X”’s best friend called Mr. Nanny. Best friend told Mr. Nanny that “X” was shooting drugs because she can’t keep a man and can’t act. We’ll spin it that Mr. Nanny felt sorry for the poor, hopeless “X”. In the humanitarian spirit that he learned from me, he did the kind thing. Also mention that I was OK with it. Make sure you say that you are a close, personal friend of Mr. Nanny’s.
    James: Your brilliance is such a turn-on.
    Angie: Yeah, baby. Now get over here and make me another baby or two.

    The above is not an except from an actual conversation. It is satire and my opinion of satire, only!

    Reply
  83. Liin said on May 6th, 2009 at 6:29 am

    JMO – it would never work if Brad and Jen got back together, too much water under the bridge, like some others here, I think its a bit much to expect.

    @ Azzy – WOW very interesting.

    Reply
  84. tyin said on May 6th, 2009 at 6:36 am

    http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/48326/brad-pitt-still-in-love-with-jennifer-aniston

    It calls Ian as source…

    Reply
  85. d said on May 6th, 2009 at 6:47 am

    from the examiner ……..and if we take the other stories leaked to be true….then this conflicts with what Ian has been hinting at…..

    “Brangelina’s bodyguard has released another new bombshell in his upcoming tell-all book proposal regarding Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. Mr. Pitt allegedly hates Jennifer Aniston so much that he always refers to her as “Nurse Ratched” when talking about her to Angelina. Ouch!

    For those who have seen One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest in 1975, you may recall Nurse Ratched, a character who instantly became synonymous with being scary, ugly, and downright creepy. I didn’t realize things were that bad between Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston. She has been a little bit nicer to Brad by comparing him to the cute, offbeat character known as Mr. Bill from Saturday Night Live.

    Reply
  86. BigApplette said on May 6th, 2009 at 6:58 am

    @d:
    I think you and the Examiner have things mixed up a bit. Nurse Ratchet was someone Jolie probably met during one or her stays in the mental hospitals she frequented. Interesting that Pitt, himself, is saying that he misses Jen and still loves her. I guess we should believe the Jolie/Brett leaked p.r. b.s. as oppsed to someone’s own words. Jolie is doing a good job of trashing Pitt through the alleged source who supposedly read the non-existent book proposal of pathological liar Micky Brett. Oh what a tangled web we weave, Ms. Jolie.

    Reply
  87. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:19 am

    @NoName:

    I believe No Name is referring to Brad Grey who is the current CEO of Paramount Pictures. Prior to that he was a partner in Plan B with Pitt and Aniston which had a first look deal with Warner Bros. After the divorce Pitt and Grey moved away from WB to Paramount and shortly after that Grey was offered the CEO position at Paramount and had to divest his position in Plan B.
    I did read some of what was posted on FF about this. One issue that has been brought up is how much the initial success of Plan B was due to Brad Grey. The initial success was due to The Departed which was produced by Plan B (Aniston’s name was removed before it was released) and made lots of money however all the other movies since then have all lost money (Run w/ Scis, Year of the Dog, AMH, AOJJ). The argument some at FF make is that Brad Grey (who’s now CEO at Par) is funding Pitt’s projects even though they bomb because he’s friends with him and it’s only because of other Par movies being so successful (and movies that were in the pipeline pre-Brad Grey) that Brad Grey hasn’t been challenged on this by his parent company Viacom which has not been doing well.
    In addition, non-Plan B produced movies in which Pitt just acts in also get funded by BGrey at Par and don’t show much profit (or show losses) such as Babel and possibly CCOBB. For CCOBB there was lots of questions about why Par poured so much into a movie that would barely break even or make very little profit with supposedly $150M-$200M prod budget + $75 mil for Oscar push for a movie that ended up taking in 330M worldwide. (I think when this was discussed people thought it would in the $250M range). So it looks possible it ended up making a profit of $50-100M. If it wasn’t for the Grey/Pitt relationship $75M would never have been poured into that marketing/Oscar push. It was also suggested that some of this money was used to buy off good reviews which seemed to be out in spades even before the movie was finished.
    So it remains to be seen how successful Plan B will be and if Brad Grey and Paramount will continue to be a main source of funding for Brad Pitt projects.

    Reply
  88. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:25 am

    @g:

    All the above was a summary of people’s opinions in case anyone missed that.

    Reply
  89. NoName said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:26 am

    @g:
    I bow to you. Yes, that it to what I was referring.

    Reply
  90. Mama San said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:35 am

    @Kate:
    Hiya Kate, she’s a blathering idiot, did you check out the pic’s of her and Clinton, I forget the convention, she looks a mess, and yes I have heard her speak, I’d rather listen to chalk screeching on a blackboard, than the BS thats spouts out of her mouth. Sorry I keep falling off the board , I’m been having trouble with my LT lately and it been shutting off, on it’s own. @Z:
    The site that I linked it looks like October 2008, is the most recent.
    @too curious:
    It looks like someone posted Guest’s post, on AJ and BP in Vietnam.
    I would really like to see more of these insiders come out and call BS or her and BP’s world humanitarian travels.

    Does anyone else here thinks she got it on with Wyclef Jean, I do, as always JMO.
    Mornin’ all

    Reply
  91. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    Looks like we got us a leak in Jen’s camp at last – woohoo! Go Jen, don’t let the witch win! You can play this game much better than St Hoier-than-thou I’m sure! Ha ha ha.

    On a more serious note if Jen wanted to get back with Brad I really don’t think it is anyone’s business but her’s. Its easy to say as an outsider what we think someone in her situation should or shouldn’t do, and how we would like to see her tell Brad to take a hike or whatever, but life is not always as straightforward as that, especially with regards to love. I myself have a set of principles that I operate by with most people on ths basis of what I consider is an acceptable way for them to treat me. If they treat me in an unacceptable way and do something to me that I would never do to them or anyone else, than that’s the end of our relationship. But with people you love and also family it is a lot more complicated than that and I think it is love that stops everything we do in life from being totally black and white. I have been treated very badly by a person that I love and I would dearly love to be able to say I have met someone else who I want to be with and am happy with them. But that has not happened to me and it may never happen, so until then this person is my only option. That may well be the case with Jen too. You can’t make yourself have feelings for someone when they are just not there. And you can’t stop yourself having feelings for people that you wish you didn’t have them for. But that’s life and that’s the way love works, not in the cut and dried way that we wish it did. So if Jen wanted to give it another try with Brad I really don’t think it is anyone’s business but her’s. And if it doesn’t work out then at least she can say she tried it and has no regrets. Maybe that will be the only way she could genuinely move on in the end. So I say GO JEN if you want Brad back, GO FOR IT my friend. And if you do make sure you give a lot of interviews to the worldwide media about how Brad absolutely adores your 40 year old body and how he loves you no matter how many wrinkes you get and wouldn’t have you any other way. Meanwhile we can watch Jolie desperately try to cling on to her looks with more and more drastic plastic surgery to try to recreate a beauty that was never naturally hers in the first place. You will have the last laugh Jen, and we will all laugh with you. Good luck with it if it is what you want and it does work out anyway, and we will all raise a glass to your future happiness. You have been trashed in the media enough.

    Reply
  92. Putznasher said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    @Mama San:

    Angie Ho may have sexed up Wyclef Jean? Well that is a strong possibility since they’re both cheats.

    Reply
  93. guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    @Mama San:

    Her ‘political advisor’ Trevor Nielsen opened the doors. She reportedly pays him 300.000 p.a.. Undercharged imo. He should milk her.
    But I don’t think politicians take her for serious. Why should they? She is a ‘decorative addition’ – as long as she is useful.

    Reply
  94. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:46 am

    @ guest – I agree, she “sexes up” the unglamorous world of politics, just like Sarah Palin did for a while. A lot of young people aren’t interested in politics because they don’t want to hear what a load of old geezers think. Jolie adds some glam and that’s her main selling point. I can’t see her ever being in a position where she has any actual power or is involved in decision-making in any capacity.

    Reply
  95. Liin said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:49 am

    Well said Keane – never a truer word spoken

    Reply
  96. Putznasher said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:52 am

    Where in the hell was I when Sarah Palin “sexed” up politics? If anything she’s a loon job that the world should fear.

    Reply
  97. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:53 am

    Just read in Brad Pitt Watch that Angeline has met the Mayor in Albany. She was in Albany for the night, the Mayor asked if he could do anything. She told him that Brad was coming over to watch the fight take it easy and stay in the Hotel room. The fight was Manny pacquiao =ricky hatton light welterweight championships from Las Vegas. Does anyone know when this fight took place.? Does this woman bull shit or what?.
    I didn’t think that they were living together anymore, I can’t keep up with all this stuff. Are they living together or not would love to know.

    Reply
  98. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:57 am

    @Keane:
    benjaminbutton14.

    well said. Go for it Jen we are with you all the way.

    Reply
  99. Mama San said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:57 am

    @guest:
    @Liin:
    @Kate:
    Could this be the face that these ol’ geezers see before “hot lips” gives em’ head for allowing her to stop in at these events. Hmmmmmm…. enquiring minds want to know.
    Before head- http://angiejolie.free.fr/images/unhcr/pakistan05-09.jpg
    After head- http://angiejolie.free.fr/images/unhcr/pakistan05-31.jpg
    As always JMO

    Reply
  100. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    @ml:

    geesh, why so snarky? who would you prefer, pussycat dolls?
    chris cornell is true to himself and a respected artist and has an amazing voice. that’s why people go to his shows. the fact that brad likes chris is one of the only things that redeems him, at least in my eyes.

    Reply
  101. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:59 am

    @ Putznasher – I don’t know, making sandwiches? You tell me!

    @ bb14 – I think it was a couple of nights ago, poor old Ricky got hospitalised, looks like its the end of the line for him unfortunately.

    Reply
  102. Liin said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:59 am

    @ BB14

    I think it was 3rd May, a few celebs attended, I have seen snipets as I have surfed.

    Reply
  103. omgwtflol said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:02 am

    @BigApplette: It seems to me that so far, the Mikkey “leaks” hurt Brad way more than Angie. What can Mikkey tell us that we don’t already know about Angie? She’s into kinky sex? She’s controlling? She giggles at dumb Brad? But his “reveals” on Pitt are the things that make people drop their jaw. The general public, I mean. I always suspected his book, if it exists, would be pro-Angelina (or at least not harm her), but anti-Brad. This latest leak fits that m.o. Maybe even worse than his wear pampers. The general public will not like him dissing his wife like that.

    PS: If Jen even thinks of taking him back, I’m done with her. It’s her life, yes, but going back to him would prove to me that she has no self respect. JMO.

    Reply
  104. tyin said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:04 am

    @bb14
    saturday night, so 2nd may…
    wasnt the LA night with cox at the concert this one?

    Reply
  105. BigApplette said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    @guest:

    I would venture a guess that any political pull that Jolie has now will go out the window once she and Pitt announce the split. No image-conscious politician will want to be too closely associated with a SINGLE, marriage-wrecking sex pot. Just too damn risky. The rumors are already flying about her and certain politicians. Sadly for Jolie, no St. John’s suit is going to turn her into a D.C. wife.

    Reply
  106. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:09 am

    @Liin:May 3? The same night he was in LA at the concert. hmmm….

    Reply
  107. Mama San said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:09 am

    Doing some research , found a couple of interesting articles.
    Did anyone else see this?
    Apparently Jenny and AJ are not through, if this is true.
    http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00017280.html
    Or this? Thoughts.
    http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=8&num=10988

    Reply
  108. BigApplette said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:09 am

    @omgwtflol:
    I totally agree. It certainly seems that it’s Jolie’s camp that is putting out the book proposal rumors. They really don’t hurt Jolie. However, they do say that she participated in diapergate. Who knows. It’s all too twisted, really. I just knew that when Pitt and Jolie hooked up, it would not end well.

    Reply
  109. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    this is interesting
    http://www.celebitchy.com/category/bill_clinton/

    Reply
  110. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    @Keane:
    That’s exactly what my husband said when I told him she was a member of CFR. He says that she’s just there to bring attention to their cause, but she has no real decision-making power.

    @Keane:
    “Maybe that will be the only way she could genuinely move on in the end. So I say GO JEN if you want Brad back, GO FOR IT my friend. And if you do make sure you give a lot of interviews to the worldwide media about how Brad absolutely adores your 40 year old body and how he loves you no matter how many wrinkes you get and wouldn’t have you any other way. Meanwhile we can watch Jolie desperately try to cling on to her looks with more and more drastic plastic surgery to try to recreate a beauty that was never naturally hers in the first place. You will have the last laugh Jen, and we will all laugh with you. Good luck with it if it is what you want and it does work out anyway, and we will all raise a glass to your future happiness. You have been trashed in the media enough.”

    I agree. I’m one of the ones that feel that she should be extremely cautious if she takes BP back. I believe in love and all that romantic shit, but when you’ve been wronged… that’s a whole other thing. Anyway, Jen will have to deal with the real Nurse Ratchet (AJ) in this scenario while she’s with BP. I hope she thinks it’s worth it. Good luck to them.

    Reply
  111. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    Mark my words everyone. Once BP and JA get back together, the real shit storm for AJ will begin. It’s well known in the industry what and who she really is and now BP won’t be there to protect her. The long line of people just waiting to bring her to justice is very long…and growing every day. Remember her ‘I’m going to give up acting and be a Mom’ line she gave a few months? And now she’s signing up for all these projects? It’s because she knows that when the truth is brought to light, she won’t have much of a career anymore so she’s grabbing what she can now.

    Reply
  112. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:23 am

    @well:
    The fight was on Saturday and the concert on Sunday.

    Reply
  113. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:24 am

    @benjaminbutton14:

    Fight was Sat night. Gee, so he would have had to go from Albany to LA on Sun for the concert Sun night and then to Brazil on Monday. Lot of traveling or someone’s BS’ing.

    This article in the timesunion.com has the story. (Just another example of the “sexed up” politics)
    Also notes Salt is finished its filming in Albany

    Mayor meets Angelina Jolie
    Last updated: 6:53 p.m., Tuesday, May 5, 2009
    It was a routine Saturday for Albany Mayor Jerry Jennings a number of events to attend, including a stop in North Albany.
    Also, on his “to do” list was a visit to the set of “Salt,” the movie starring Angelina Jolie that was finishing its last weekend of shooting on the highways near the Empire State Plaza.
    “Who’s in charge,” Jennings asked one of the set guys as he arrived. The guy pointed and Jennings went over and introduced himself to the “boss,” who said he was aware the mayor had reached out to director Phillip Noyce when the filming began.
    “Is everything all right?” Jennings asked the boss, adding, “If it’s not inconvenient, I’d like to welcome Angelina to the city.”
    Jolie walked over dressed in jeans, a cap covering her hair and a light-colored coat for the scene where she jumps off a truck shook Jennings’ hand and told him she enjoyed her stay in Albany.
    The city was chosen because of the three levels of highways near the Empire State Plaza meant to represent the nation’s capital. On the set was a D.C. police car, Jennings said. “They looked at this and loved it,” he said of the roads.
    He knew the actress was staying the night and suggested, if she needed anything, to let him know. She said “Brad (Pitt) was coming over and they were going to take it easy, stay in the hotel room and watch the fight,” referring to the Manny Pacquiao-Ricky Hatton light-welterweight championship from Las Vegas, Jennings said.
    Jolie invited Jennings to stay for some of the shooting. He declined, saying he had other commitments. But, before he walked away, the mayor posed with the star for a photo on his cell phone.
    Carol DeMare

    Reply
  114. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    And so it begins…or rather, continues…

    http://www.starmagazine.com/angelina_jolie_tell_all_book/news/15559

    Reply
  115. omgwtflol said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:27 am

    @BigApplette:

    Yeah, she was in diapergate (lol) but so what? She’s on record as being a sexual freak. And remember, it was Brad wearing the diaper. :) Everything about that story paints Pitt as a weeny. For Angie, it’s just another day of kinky monkey sex.

    Reply
  116. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:29 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:Thanks for clarifying. Still seems like alot of traveling in a 48 hour period.

    Reply
  117. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:31 am

    @ well – that has always been my theory too, that she is protected by her relationship with “good guy” figure and significant HW power-player Brad. The 6 young innocent children are also a great buttress from PR attacks. When she is on her own, especially if she does not have custody of all the children, she will be extremely exposed in my view and all her psat misdeeds will come back to bite her on the ass big style. Its difficult for me to comprehend why she doesn’t get this though and doesn’t see what a very, very dangerous game she’s been playing all these years. You can’t just ride roughshod over everyone, appoint yourself Queen of HW and take all the attention away from other stars and think no-one is going to be out to get you later on in the day. Especially if you’re not known for being particularly nice. I know Angelina is not greatly intelligent, but I don’t think she’s totally stupid either. She is street smart in my view, good at getting herself places but not so good at keeping herself there necessarily. Or rather, she is too clever for her own good, i.e. the things that she has done to elevate herself will be the things that bring her staight back down again too. I think her hook-up with Brad and all the kids she had with him in such a short time will be openly questioned in the media once the split is announced and I think people will wise pu to her Machiavellian ways. BTW what do you mean when you say its well-known in the industry “what and who she really is”? How do people see her, can you say?

    Reply
  118. Liin said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:32 am

    @ AFM

    Thanks for clarifying, so much to read, plus time differences between US and UK, it get confusing!

    Reply
  119. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    that link i posted earlier had some tidbits. in the gershon part, it states that clinton, s. bing, and an entourage were in NY going up in a elevator. in the clinton and pitt in new orleans story, s. bing is also tied in. look at all the connections between these people

    Reply
  120. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:37 am

    CoverAwards.com

    Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston Together Again
    In Touch is reporting that Jen and Brad met on the night of April 23rd. Apparently, Brad defied Angelina – never a smart move! The magazine is reporting all the details of their reunion, including the intimate location, the gifts and his surprising confession.

    Plus, and this is a BIG plus, Brad is wearing the necklace Jen gave him.

    Do you think readers will buy a Jen & Brad cover in 2009?

    Without a doubt!

    If In Touch doesn’t have it’s biggest sale of the year with this cover, I’m not sure what else they can do with Brad, Jen and Angelina. (Brad sleeping with Jen would be the only cover to top this one!)

    This cover is a winner across the board.

    If In Touch offers bonuses to its staff, I bet the photo director will earn a big one for spotting Brad Pitt wearing the same neckace as Jen. Damn – that is good.

    The main line ‘Together Again’ is strong – but what brings this cover to the next level are the details served up in the dek.

    The magazine reports on the SPECIFIC DATE! Talk about putting your neck out there. They must really believe this meeting happened on that day or there is no way they would have put the actual date. It’s simply too easy for the story to be debunked. In Touch could have simply noted that the meeting took place “at the end of April.”

    Bottom Line: A big photo find with specific details on America’s favorite triangle is still a winner on newsstands – a BIG winner.

    Reply
  121. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:42 am

    @Keane:It doesn’t surprise me one bit. You’re exactly right…’the ends justifies the means’ to her, she was and is so confident in her manipulation skills that she always thought she’d be able to hold her position by manipulation. And her Borderline Personality Disorder. Unfortunately, being on the receiving end of her pleuthora of mental illnesses, is a horrible position to be in. BPDers lie about everything, and use tactics to literally shake your foundation. BPDers can eff you up so badly, they can have you convinced your name isn’t really your name in a few weeks. So, for her, it’s not just mental illness, it’s choices she’s made that are diabolical, that have hurt so many people, how she’s set out to destroy people who she considered a threat – including Jen.

    Keane, there will be some stuff coming out soon. And I believe Ian is writing a book and now Andrew Morton. Ooooh this is going to get so ugly for her. No wonder why she recently hired a publicist.

    Rumor has it that she’s holding up a white flag…or at least a couple of days ago tried to apologize for the 15 years of horrible, diablocial things she’s done. And if it’s true, I find it absolutely effing hilarious! It’s like Hitler invading all these countries, killing 6 million jews and then saying ‘oh, I’m sorry. I learned my lesson, please forgive me’.

    Reply
  122. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:43 am

    I just re-read the end of my last post and please know everyone that I did not mean to offend anyone by my last comparison and I apologize if I have.

    Reply
  123. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:44 am

    @Keane:
    I like what you said in another thread ( I think the Bunny Boo one) that what will bring her down in the end is her behavior in front of everyone and not her secrets. That sounds pretty accurate… to me at least. Everything you do out in the open is what people question (or should question in her case) the most. Too many contradictions leaves you open for much scrutiny and judgment… and that’s what I believe her problem is. JMO.

    Reply
  124. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    @ justhelping – yes that was interesting, they are all closely linked aren’t they? And if Clinton has had a thing with Saffron Burrows and Gina Gershon, its not much of a stretch to imagine he’s been getting down and dirty with our fave lady huh? The Saffron Burrows thing confused me slightly though as the last I heard of her she was in a relationship with a much older theatre actress. This was a few years ago though and she has been with men before so it doesn’t make it impossible. God, the things a bit of power can do for you hey? When I met Clinton he seemed like a nice guy but he was hardly the stuff wet dreams were made of! Note to all men: if you want a lot of action run for Prez, its the fastest shortcut to getting laid it seems!

    Reply
  125. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    I’m beginning to realize that ‘In Touch’ is Brad’s outlet, with how tapped in they seem to be with what’s really going on. Doesn’t Ian have a good relationship with the Sr. Editor at In Touch? Hmmmm….

    Reply
  126. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    @g:

    If In Touch offers bonuses to its staff, I bet the photo director will earn a big one for spotting Brad Pitt wearing the same neckace as Jen. Damn – that is good.

    That was mentioned here and on FF. Any mag could have picked that up if they were reading here.

    Reply
  127. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    @g:
    In Touch=Brad Star=Brad
    OK=Jolie
    L+S=Jolie

    ME is reporting they are bracing for a 250 mil split nastiest in history and fight over 6 kids.

    So who will get People? LOL

    interesting that Daryl did not have am article yesterday,but since IAN put this one up he countered it or Jolie do with that one.

    It is possible he went over to watch the fight (see the kids) odd way to put it if they are living together isn’t?I would think he would want to see the kids before LA and then Brazil.

    The matching necklaces that Brad and Jen were wearing someone pointed out on here and he has not tried to cover it up.

    Reply
  128. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    @ well – sounds like you know some goss, shame that you can’t spill! I certainly thing that considering some of the things she is rumoured to have done, i.e. faking pregnancies and selling the pics for cash, selling pics of her and Brad’s offspring that may not actually be his, saying all the money goes to charity when it actually doesn’t, having and adopting kids to keep him, illegal adoptions etc etc are things that you can get caught out on pretty damn quickly. If any of those things are true then they aren’t the type of things you can keep quiet forever. Did she honestly think she was going to be some sort of untouchable Queen of the World type figure who did not need to behave according to any law or be answerable to anyone except herself? What type of delusional narcissist do you have to be to genuinely believe that? Again, those comparisons with Hitler are apposite.

    And re: holding up a “white flag”, I sure do think she’s been trying to do that in the media for some time now. Its what I refer to as the “poor Angie” news. Poor Angie is upset because she is filming such long hours she never gets chance to see her kids, but when Brad was filming Poor Angie had to look after all the kids all by herself all day long. Poor Angis is jealours and angry that Jen Aniston keeps talking about Brad in interviews (even though Poor Angie stole him from her in the first place). Poor Angie didn’t realise how demanding filming Salt would be, she is giving it her best like the kick-ass that she is but it is all very tiring and stressful for Poor Angie. Poor Angie is mad with Brad over the supposed “nanny incident” in which nothing actually happened but Poor Angie was upset anyway which is terrible. Poor Angie is willing to give Mean Brad half her fortune for custody of their children as her kids are the most important thing in the world to her, far more than material wealth, (cough, bullshit, cough). And so it goes on. I would call that a PR white flag in any case. In what way was she supposed to have apologised and to whom, can you say?

    Reply
  129. hughes said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:06 am

    I don’t buy it. It sounds too much like the fanfic that’s been playing out on the msg boards lately. It’s too much like Ian just telling them what they want to hear.

    Reply
  130. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:08 am

    @well:
    Wow! Who did she try to apologize to? Or was it a general apology to the long list of people she’s fucked over? Can you say?

    Reply
  131. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    @ hughes – I don’t think anyone here particulary wants Jen to get back with Brad though so how would that work? Most people want her to say screw you to him and run off into the sunset with someone else. My feeling is if that what she wants good luck to her, but I have never really cared either way what happens with them, I don’t have any emotion invested in it. People write stuff off all the time as being the product of a “Jen Hen’s” fantasy projection. It’s a useful tool to discredit anything that is remotely anti-Angelina. But it won’t work forever.

    @ AFM – yeah that was in response to Kate saying that she thinks no matter what threatens to come out about Ange she will be able to get her PR demons to keep it quiet. But I disagree with that, she hasn’t been able to keep this quiet yet and she does not control the universe so there is no way she can stop any negative press coming out about her for all eternity. Plus, even if she does manage to keep a lot of people quiet with legal threats and confidentiality clauses, she will still be judged on her public behaviour, and that as we can all see, is not half as pretty as she thinks it is.

    @ well – so do you think those B/W Afghanistan shots might be something to do with “waving the white flag”? Look how good and devoted to my humanitarian causes I am, see I am a friend to these impoverished “ethnic” peoples, I make them laugh and grace them with my beguiling presence (all that they need to get through life after all). I am good, honest, please believe me? Etc.

    Reply
  132. Mama San said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    Hey Keanne, thanks for the post in regards to, as BigApplette put it “diapergate” on the other thread.
    I haven’t seen Ch, post since then, so just to clear the air and put it out there. My position other than being a parent on that whole alleged “diapergate” incident, is this. JMO, considering AJ’s sordid and checkered sexual past, from kindergarten{her own words}, up until the present. There is nothing publicly seen , read, or heard from this woman that her sexual appetites are anything but normal. IMO, she is amoral, not immoral. Big difference, immoral people know there are wrong and do it anyway, AJ, IMO is of the type that is pathologically amoral, she IMO has an “above the law”, superiority complex, that “the ends justify the means”. People such as her operate on a different level. In regards to the whole “diapergate” incident, if true, belies a deeper pathology of her psyche, and she brought BP down in the muck with her.
    If one is using critical thinkng , to come up with a logical deductive argument, if this story is true, and the numerous rumors of AJ’s “parenting for paps only” style, and possible incest, than IMO it is absolutely within the realm of possiblity than AJ and allegedly BP as well, would have a hard time dissassociating their sexuality with parenting. Other than BP’s parents for him , a seeminly decent upbringing, who was AJ’s role models growing up, who taught her about sex, parenting, mothering etc., when was this woman’s child-hood normal? IMO I would not be surprised is she was a one point in her child-hood raped. Like I posted earlier she was made to be amoral, not born that way.
    If a person is getting off on acting like a baby during sex, wearing a nappie, pooing and peeing, and whatever else this perversion IMO includes, any mental health professional would ask, the following questions of these persons and not be out of line, especially if they had kids.
    Another thing to consider AJ is not a hand’s on mom, hence the nannie squad, maybe she is incapable of handling the daily duties of mothering such as bathing and changing the babe’s diapers ,because she cannot dissassociate her sexuality with being a mother. She maybe that rare bird that is incapable of having a “mothering instinct”.
    JMO, this scenario seems more plausible than any other, and there are cases of such, it is not out of the realm of possiblity that a person who commits incest , would have issues , with raising their own kids.
    Or even molesting their own kids.
    Like I posted earlier, my question would be, was a real baby’s voice{ if true} used on the recording ?
    Does changing your child invoke feelings of arousal, does bathing, etc?
    Believe or not , if someone got AJ or BP on their couch to head shrink them, this would be the line of questions asked, to see how far gone they are, and if they are treatable?
    AJ has used her sexuality since kindrgarten, I honestly do not think she knows any other way, she is hyper-sexual, and children of sexual abuse exhibit the very same issues she has, the difference most victims don’t make a life or a living out of it, they move on , get better , and can lead relatively happy, healthy lives, with therapy and commitment, any one can, same with drug addiction, AJ’s addicted to addictions.
    IMO I think AJ showed BP a whole new light to sex and the game, he is not so much the issue as IMO I think AJ is, she’s the dangerous, unstable one, he’s just a guy who thought with his dick as usual, nothin’ new there.
    How can a person who gets off on shitting in a diaper , having sex while listening to baby’s cries, ,not get aroused when their own kids do it? IMO I don’t think they can, that was really my point about the thread,and if they are capable of doing a true 180.
    If these two are engaging in that type of sexual activity, what else is there , where would the line be drawn? AJ has been quoted that she has very few rules as possible for her kids.
    Just how permissive will this woman be with her children, what will be her position to her kids on drugs and sex when the time comes? Will there be any boundaries? Who will protect the girls? Who is going to teach them the ways of being a woman, their mom? Hardly , it always goes back to the beginning, who was there for AJ and her role models …her brother?
    Brad and Jen need to get back together , move to Missouri , get out of the spotlight and go raise them kids right. If the kids are left to their mother’s upbringing and devices , …. well …..we seen how AJ turned out.
    As always JMO.

    Reply
  133. rotorua said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    @Keane:
    Molto brava, Keane. Beautifully said. I’m absolutely with you on this one. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction…as is love. I’m living proof ( but that’s another story).

    @well- yes, please give us more details…the apology sounds interesting- but to who??

    @g On the ball there too, re the In Touch cover. It could be the biggest selling cover in history if they ever get back together. And yes- we have been discussing those necklaces for a while ( including the pink rope one that i swear is some kind of circle of protection- why else would he be wearing it so much? ).

    Go Courtney and Jen!

    Reply
  134. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    That was supposed to be:

    My feeling is if that what she wants IS HIM good luck to her

    And:

    she hasn’t been able to keep this SITE quiet yet

    But hopefully you got the gist!

    Reply
  135. esmerelda said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Is Ted C finally going to let loose? The AT this morning:

    Page Six is reporting that Angelina Jolie’s skeletons might be outted in a more legal, and trendier, fashion. Rumor has it famed author Andrew Morton has targeted Ange as the subject of his next supposedly juicy unauthorized biography.

    Yeah, well, the former tabloid journalist has already pubbed books (in chronological order) on Princess Diana, Monica Lewinsky, Posh ‘n’ Becks and Tom Cruise.

    Unfortunately, the pattern here isn’t one of uncovering high-profile zingers and exposés, but the fact that each Morton tome has steadily been less juicy and goose-bump-inciting than the one prior.

    Think of Morton as the M. Night Shyamalan of tell-all smut literature. And that’s precisely what has me damn worried: Is he really the right dude to go after Ange?

    Now, if Andrew can get back to his Diana days, then yeah, this will be one helluva page-turner. Only prob is Diana totally gave Morton everything he had in Diana: Her True Story, and we all know Jolie is not going to be that forthcoming. Like, not at all.

    Oh, and you better believe A.J. will have bigger and better lawyers than Tom Cruise did to ensure her nasty secrets get no where near print. Maybe the Awful Truth should take this one on? Watch out, E! snit-lawyers!

    http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b122332_morning_piss_who_should_write_angelina.html#comments

    Reply
  136. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:17 am

    @Mama San:
    She’s wanting him, look @ her body language. Also, she looks high.

    Reply
  137. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:18 am

    @g:
    The date the gave was April 23 which was the cherry blossom festival , wonder if there will be a picture of Jen on the back of Brads motor cycle? LOL

    lainey of course is dismissing this saying they will debunk it by bringing out either Shi or the twins

    Reply
  138. Patty anne said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    To have a successful marriage, one must have trust and respect. I don’t see how Jennifer could ever wholly trust or respect Brad after what he’s done the past four years, and HOW he has gone about it. Once a cheater/back-stabber forever one. Who is to know if and when it would happen again? It seems he is more concerned with how he feels about things than how this entire fiasco is affecting the children born to this toxic relationship. Abandon them to Psycho-Angie? Think of the nightmares of Shiloh at 14 in threesomes with momma included? Angie taking Maddox to her bed when he’s 18? or younger? The man would be ripped apart inside with worry and over active imagination . This is the “mistake” Brad will be paying for the rest of his life. I don’t think Jennifer is stupid enough to place herself, and any future children of hers , into this mess. Just the thought of Jennifer’s child being together with the wild hellions of Jolie’s would scare me to death were i she. We know that Brad is puzzy-whipped with AJ…so how much could he stand up to protect a child with Aniston while having visitation with Jolie’s Hellions? No, i hope Jennifer has some serious thoughts about any consideration of returning to a relationship with Brad….for all their sakes!

    Reply
  139. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:25 am

    @ esmerelda – sounds like he’s growing tired of reporting on tame Twilight tweener gossip and wants to get a piece of the real gossip action for 2009! Go Ted, to hell with those damn e lawyers, put your money where your mouth is and stand up for what you believe in! Some things are more important than money.

    Reply
  140. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    @Keane:The apology thing is nothing new – it’s been done time and time again. It’s part of the circle of manipulation. She attacks, then recoils, attack and recoil. In between each attack and recoil is an ‘I’m so sorry, it’s just that I love you so much’. Classic manipulation and breaking down one’s spirit. In this case I’m not sure who it was to…I heard it was to Brad re: the media mess that’s going on. She totally overestimated her own power and authority in engaging in a media war. Now it’s getting ugly and she’s totally backtracking.

    For whatever anyone feels about Pitt, he is a powerhouse in Hollywood. He is still sought after for projects and he has many allies. Messing with his reputation is something I would never ever ever do, and she’s been doing it for quite some time. How this plays out will be directly related by how she behaves through this break up. She continues to battle, it will be ugly ugly ugly.

    Reply
  141. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:29 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:Her apology – this time – was a white flag saying she was giving up the war in the media. She has been leaking all of this stuff in hopes of ruining his reputation, thinking she had more power than him. She is beginning to realize the opposite is true and that she is up the creek without a paddle so to speak.

    Reply
  142. Mama San said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:30 am

    @Patty anne:
    I’m glad someone else thinks the way I do about AJ, right on Patti. Good Post, ITA.

    Reply
  143. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:30 am

    @Keane:
    oh IDK I want her to get back with Brad ,it would duck with lainey,JJ, Perez,LOL, and I think they could be good parents together, a warm family unit. Jmo

    Reply
  144. Mama San said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:32 am

    @bettieboop:
    I so agree, I thought the exact same thing, that’s quite an intimate look she’s giving him, JMO, I call it as I see it, they did it.

    Reply
  145. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:33 am

    @Mama San:
    love your posts and thoughts. plenty to think about.

    pattyanne w/ regard to trust and respect….. since Jen has already survived a huge betrayal (i’m huge into the psychology of trust and betrayal) it is up to the person having been betrayed to decide going forward what level of “trust” is appropriate for them. personally, i think “trust” is tricky after a major betrayal. i now try only to “trust” myself — relying on my intuition and examining my motivations (the “real” truth) rather than mis-placing trust in certain others. know thyself. Jen strikes me as very wise, very grounded for someone in HW. she will be OK.

    Reply
  146. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:34 am

    @well:
    so she just shifted it to Jen LOL … Today

    Reply
  147. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:35 am

    @sinker:

    sorry i used so many dumb “quote” in that post — wish we could edit!

    Reply
  148. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:36 am

    @ well – plus she’s making herself look even more bitchy than people thought she was in the first place in my view. Has this woman never heard of the principle of keeping your head down, keeping a low profile, getting on with your work and just not ruffling too many feathers? I.e. don’t make a bad situation worse by trying to fight your way out of it. The best thing she can do right now is to stay out of the spotlight, keep her mouth shut and just roll with the punches in my view. If she tries to take Brad down it will be curtains for her in more ways than one. She needs to sack that Trev guy stat. Is he seriously a respected person in the PR world do you know? Cos I think he’s shocking! The film choices, the famewhoring, all for short-term gain and no long-term career development. I guess if he is trying to make a quick buck out of her (which is a PRs main purpose I guess) before he moves on to the next “client” then he is going about it the right way. The obvious Oscar bait roles plus the juvenile action flicks = crap advice in my view. She’s always going too high and low brow and needs to try to go somewhere more in the middle if she ever wants great acting success I reckon. It sounds to me like this Trev guy also has delusions of grandeur and can make Angelina whatever they want her to be. But it doesnt work like that, she’s got to appeal to her auidence. Which I think in a matter of years will be rapidly dwindling!

    Reply
  149. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:37 am

    Can someone pls tell me what IDK stands for?

    Reply
  150. rotorua said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:38 am

    @well:
    Thanks for the update, “well”. Very believable, esp re HWood will get behind Pitt in a breakup. With you on the borderline personality…plus i also think she’s bipolar to boot ( yes, i keep saying it).

    As for Pitt- I believe that the worm has turned. But a teeny niggling doubt has me hoping that he’s not using a Jen reunion as his get out of jail free card…

    Reply
  151. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:43 am

    @well:
    It sounds that with so many people on BP’s side that have a lot of dirt on AJ, she will get a taste of her own medicine. Even if her reputation isn’t immaculate, the public is still intrigued at knowing more dirt on her. Who isn’t? If BP’s allies let loose their knowledge of her indiscretions, all hell will break loose for her. All they have to do is what she has been doing…. leaking stuff in the internet, anonymous tips on rags, etc. The internet is where it’s at IMO.

    Reply
  152. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:44 am

    @well:
    It stands for “I Don’t Know”.

    Reply
  153. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:45 am

    @rotorua:Not about the get out of jail free card. Nope I don’t think so. Jen and Brad have remained friends throughout the years, much to AJ’s chagrin. Everyone knew this was going to happen…or shall I say, that once Brad became strong enough to pull him out of the ‘hostage situation’ LOL he was in, that he would end up going back to Jen. When they got together all those years ago, there was so much pressure on them both…and they were each others’ comfort and best friends.

    Reply
  154. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    P@Kate:
    @well:
    sorry it means I don’t know, and I completely agree about Brad being a powerhouse. I think his last few films would have done better if he was not with her, people are so sick of her.

    Reply
  155. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:52 am

    @Mama San:
    Interesting. I don’t doubt it.

    Reply
  156. Kate said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    @Keane:
    @well:
    I am so glad to hear you say that, I have been hearing that for years,Jen was just sort of biding her time but each time I suggested this people thought I was crazy, then I started thinking I was, LOL

    Reply
  157. Courtney said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:55 am

    Ok, people let’s think about reality and not assume that these three (BP, JA, and AJ) are anything but human.

    Brad did run into his ex’s best friend at a concert and I’m sure he said something along the lines of “I’m sorry for hurting Jen”. They were married, in love, and friends, and although it didn’t last, that doesn’t mean he doesn’t regret hurting her. I think the media is jumping to conclusions, as they always do, about BP and JA.

    Also, if someone in a relationship cheats, there is something missing/wrong in the relationship. If he found what he was looking for with Jolie, and I’m NOT condoning cheating, then there was a lack in his marriage with Aniston. People in happy, healthy marriages don’t cheat. So I don’t really think he would go back to JA.

    My opinion: I find Aniston completely self absorbed in a Hollywood way. I have been involved in the ent. business and have met her. 1) She’s orange from all the tanning. 2) She cares way too much about her personal apperance and little else. 3) Her life focuses around her next role….that’s probably never going to come (IMO). I think that Jolie has more substance to her (maybe not physically anymore). She is a UN Ambassador, she travels all over the world helping the needy, and she has opened her heart and home to adopted children, which is very hard to do. I find her more fascinating and intriguing, and I think that long after her acting career is over she will still be relevent and do so much for the world. Aniston? She can barely think outside of herself. So sure, Brad looks tired and weary. But I think he left his “Hollywood’s Golden Boy” image behind him and discovered through Jolie that there is a world out there besides his own good looks and movie premiere. Aniston hasn’t.

    Reply
  158. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    @Kate:
    I guess there is a love story in all this mess. LOL. I never thought you were crazy, though. Romantic, yes, but not crazy. Well, I guess all roads will lead them back to each other… that’s frickin’ beautiful. Hope they can get past all the bs that was “the relationship” with baby mama.

    Reply
  159. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    @well:
    Let the shit flow. I think when everything is said & done, AJ want be able to hold her head up high. Well, at least I hope. I realize she has lots of money & high powered attorneys but surely there comes a time when even that is not enough. Right?

    Reply
  160. Gitano said on May 6th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    Pitt is/was never in Brazil. That is/was a ruse. He is/was with “Bunny Boo”. His preferred plan is to get Aniston on side in an “open relationship”. That’s what he wanted before. And she might just go for it this time as long as their contract stipulates that she will star in Oscar-vehicles of her choosing. She too is a PR whore, an artificial creature of Hollywood. Neither Pitt, Aniston nor Holie are capable of real love. Is all business with benefits. JMO.

    Reply
  161. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @Keane:Keane, no she doesn’t. She once screamed at me ‘You will respect me!!!! Do you understand? You will respect me!!!!’

    This was over the phone, I had no idea who she was. She viewed me as an adversary…long story but she was trying to manipulate my best friend (theirs was a professional relationship – she infiltrated his life to try to convince him I was a horrible person because I had dirt on her from 7 years earlier.) She wasn’t even on my ‘radar’ but still launched an assault, trying to destroy me. All because I had dirt on her that could have ruined her.

    So she was yelling at me, made some comments about me wanting to have sex with my pets and then screamed that I should respect her and warned me that I didn’t know who I was messing with. I called her crazy and that just made her more angry.

    I believe that’s when she tried to destroy me more, and I was oblivious.

    She has no filter, but worse, she has no morals, integrity. And no soul.

    Just to add my disclaimer – this is all just speculation and rumor. LOL.

    Reply
  162. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:11 am

    @well:
    Rumor has it she’s holding up a white flag for 15 years of diabolic behavior????? Because books are coming out you can’t go into detail as far as what you know? We all know when celeb’s get in trouble (drinking/drugging) they go to rehab, would AJ use such a tatic & maybe come out & say I severly depressed blah blah & go into a pschyc ward hoping to gain sympathy. Look at me I’m wanting to be a better person.

    Reply
  163. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    @ Courtney – Brad wasn’t “cheating” per se, sounds like they had an open relationship, but he wanted it to be a bit more open than she did.

    Re: your thoughts on Jen. I could turn that around and say Jolie has had more plastic surgery than Jen and many other women in HW, quite superficial and obsessed with her appearance wouldn’t you say? Angelina is obsessed with her own career, used Brad to position herself in HW and showed her true colours at all the recent awards do’s with her cuntface towards Anne Hathaway and her very insincere pleasure at Kate Winslet’s triumph. Jolie uses her UN role to promote herself, especially when people are about to vote in awards season (have you seen her recent B/W pics in Afghanistan BTW) and has never once had to suffer or rough it to help anyone like the hundreds of thousands of poorly paid aid workers around the world do. She stays in five star hotels and then hotfoots it back to her 60 million dollar chateua and full house staff to cater to her every need. She has adopted three children and has sold images of them for millions of dollars and used them to promote herself. She has a team of at least nannies to raise those children and she is said to have changed as few nappies as 1 in 100. The world Brad Pitt discovered through Jolie was a world of abject fame-whoring, media manipulation and shameless self-promotion, nothing at all to do with helping people or saving the world. Maybe he will be grateful to go back to straightforward Jen who has her career, does charity work quietly in her spare time with no need for a media circus to follow her every deed, and who is a normal, feet-on-the-ground, undemanding kind of chick. I’m sure after what he’s been through in the past few years, that will be more than enough for him. Sometimes its not what someone does that counts, its who they are. JMO.

    Reply
  164. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    In the Star magazine Well posted earlier, it said the AJ slept with mom’s boyfriend. She pleaded for forgiveness and mommy forgave her. May or may not be true, but would make sense.
    From Well
    http://www.starmagazine.com/angelina_jolie_tell_all_book/news/15559

    Reply
  165. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:16 am

    @bettieboop:Yes. She’s already done that. Right around the time I heard rumors of some stuff she did and someone refusing a $ settlement offer from her lawyers, out came a ‘Angie’s still depressed over the death of her mother’ article. And a few others, about how she’s depressed and exhausted. Just as I expected.

    Reply
  166. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    @BigApplette: . Hilarious!

    Reply
  167. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    @ well – yeah that sounds like the Angie we all know and love! I have had my fair share of tussles with her on here (oh that’s if you believe it was her of course, could just be some demented fan of hers desperate to defend her honour, yeah right!). It takes some balls (and some lunacy) to think you can take the whole world on and win. You simply can’t do that. There are too many people with influence and power out there who will take you down if you try. Did you hear about how I got my e-mail hacked into (as did Ian) and someone posted a comment under my real name (dumbass committed a crime, she should have checker her internet law first)? Simply for commenting here to the effect that I am willing to believe what Ian has said. Plus its a major bugbear of hers that I have worked for the BBC. She finds my employment history deepy threatening for some reason! She has also tried to educate me on how to be a journalist (she kindly taught me about the 5 W’s (!), which was helpful as I needed a quick recap on something I learnt when I was 18) and then thought she’d (or whoever is doing her dirty work for her right now) drop me a few pointers on BBC editorial policy which she cadged from the internet! I was like great that’s really kind of you, but I actually have the full BBC editorial guidelines printed out right next to me and then a summary of them in note form. I was discussing them in detail at an interview at the beeb only the other day. Bizarre that she would care so much what a random commenter on a not yet widely read gossip blog would have to say right? Takes paranoia and megalomania to a whole new level. Oh and from my dealings with her here I can categorically report back that she sure ain’t that intelligent! NEVER believe anyone who says that she is.

    Reply
  168. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:34 am

    @ well – oh yeah, she’s just used that one to cover the alleged real reason behind her dramatic weight loss. There was an article where James Haven was quoted as saying Ange is simply too depressed to eat right now because of her problems with Brad. He neatly linked it back to her mother’s death by saying “its just like when she couldn’t eat after her mother died”. I mean come on, how many times are you going to exploit the death of your mother to save your neck? Remember when she started crying in a press conference because she was talking about her mother, right after Jen’s “uncool” quote in Vogue? A journo in The Mirror I think it was commented on how convenient it was that she brought up her mother’s death and got all emotional considering the furore in the press about her saying she fell in love with Brad on the set of MAMS. She plays a very, very dangerous PR game in my view, I don’t know how she’s got away with it all this time. It can only be so long before it all comes tumbling down in my view. JMO.

    Reply
  169. sama said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    EntertainmentWise said this today

    With his relationship with Angelina Jolie reportedly at breaking point, Brad Pitt has apparently found an unlikely source of comfort – his ex-wife Jennifer Aniston.

    According to a new report, the former spouses have been in constant contact in recent weeks, culminating in a secret meeting in New York on April 23.

    It’s claimed that Brad visited Angelina on the set of Salt before heading across town to the set of Jen’s upcoming movie The Baster, which is also currently filming in the Big Apple.

    In Touch quotes ‘a mutual friend of the former couple’ who says: “He pulled up in his black SUV.

    “He arrived on the opposite end of the set from where Jen’s trailer was, and Jen snuck into his car. They drove around New York City together, talking.”

    “Brad confessed his feelings to Jen. He told her that he is trying to make his relationship with Angelina work, but it is failing.”

    The reunion-to-go reportedly lasted an hour, with Brad dropping Jen off at The Greenwich Hotel when it was over.

    The source adds: “They had to plan it meticulously so no one would find out.”

    The report also claims Brad is currently wearing a necklace his ex-wife gave him for his 45th birthday last December.

    Needless to say, Jen’s rep denies all of the above!

    Reply
  170. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:37 am

    @well:
    As I asked/stated in a previous post; even with all her money & high paid/powered attorney’s surely she can’t continue to get all this shit swept under the rug, can she? Is this the start of the shit hitting the fan?
    I mean really.

    Reply
  171. ladybert62 said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:44 am

    @well:
    I think it means “I dont’ know”

    Reply
  172. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    While we’re on the subject of acronyms, can anyone tell me what ROTFLMAO means? I think that that’s how it goes. I get the end bit is laughed my ass off but what is the rest?! In maybe the year I have posted on gossip blogs I have never had a clue what this meant!

    Reply
  173. sama said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:49 am

    National Ledger says this:

    Jennifer Aniston & Brad Pitt Together Again, Where’s Angelina Jolie?
    ——————————————————————————–

    By Christi Hall
    May 6, 2009

    The Brangelina plus Jennifer Aniston triangle is fired up and on high speed again. In Touch Weekly has the threesome covered this week and the claim is that Jennifer is helping Brad deal with stresses at home, including Angelina Jolie. How will Aniston help her ex hubby?

    is Jennifer Helping Brad With Angelina?

    In Touch reports, “As Brad Pitt copes with tension at home, he has been getting support from an unlikely ally — his ex-wife, Jennifer Aniston. Friends say that in recent weeks, Brad and Jen, 40, have been talking frequently on the phone and texting each other, their conversations becoming longer and more personal as he confides in her about his current situation.”

    ***

    The celebrity magazine adds it can “exclusively reveal” that on “April 23, after Brad visited Angelina, 33, on the NYC set of Salt, he drove across town to where Jen’s film The Baster was in production — and the pair quietly met face-to-face. “He pulled up in his black SUV,” reveals a mutual friend of the former couple, although Jen’s rep denies the story.”

    “He arrived on the opposite end of the set from where Jen’s trailer was, and Jen snuck into his car. They drove around New York City together, talking,” a friend of the former couple told In Touch.

    Reply
  174. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    @Keane:The email thing doesn’t surprise me. If you only know my experience with her, it would blow your mind.

    Trying to get me fired from two jobs was only a drop in the bucket for me. Employment shows stability and credibility and the first thing she tries to do is destroy credibility.

    During the conversation above, I threatened to kick her ass because she made my beautiful 3 year old niece cry by brutually chastizing her because she couldn’t take the girls giggles about her uncle. I didn’t give a shit who the hell she was, anyone who hurts someone I love will be put in their place! So she used that kicking her ass threatening incident and reported that I ‘made a physical threat to her’. She tracked my internet usage, and gained access to my emails…and then she infiltrated the message boards, or rather, 1 in particular, I went on and tried to degrade me and harass me there. About her not being too bright? She used her name on one of them – AngelinaJoliePitt. Some friends found out about it and came on and told her ‘You’re MRS. SMITH Bitch, not Mrs. Pitt.’ That part was funny, and I just couldn’t face the lengths she was going to to try and harass, degrade, and terrify me. Rather I could NOT face it then, now I can.

    Until recently, I would be sitting at my computer working and my yahoo email would kick me off saying ‘you have been disconnected from yahoo because you signed in on another terminal or device’. So yah, that’s just par for the course.

    Her MO is this – she will try anything in her power to attack your credibility, to terrify you and make you afraid and be-little you.. She’ll take anything from your past, especially if it was painful and find your weak spot around it and then threaten you with it. She’s more than just a bully, she’s a sociopath.

    Reply
  175. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:52 am

    @bettieboop:It is coming out now. She’s launched waaaay to many Pre-Emptive Strikes on people. But really, money buys quite a bit of silence these days. Quite a bit.

    Reply
  176. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:53 am

    @Patty anne:

    Re: the trust and respect thing. JA got through a long separation with her mother and they’ve managed to reconcile. She seems pretty grounded and will probably be able to handle this also IMO

    However, I agree with the whole babymama nightmare. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone and just don’t see how it would work unless they (BP & JA) get full custody and can prevent any AJ infuence whatsoever. God knows what she’s already done to warp those kids minds.

    Reply
  177. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    @Courtney:
    ..”long after her acting career is over she will still be relevent and do so much for the world. ”

    IF her children are so important to her, and IF (BIG IF) she is SO relevant and so needed by the world, why doesnt she, oh I dunno, just stay home and look after all the kids she was so desperate to have, and devote herself to charity work. Maybe she could carry on the work of Mother Teresa, as thats how you make her sound. :)

    Reply
  178. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    @Keane:And another thing, of COURSE she’s come on here. Actually, there’s no doubt in my mind that she’s here often.

    Reply
  179. karenab said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:57 am

    @Keane:
    rolling on the floor…….

    Reply
  180. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:58 am

    @well:
    I know that about the money but I also know there comes a time when “people” can’t do much because of ones own admissions. Not that the money drys up but the surrounding do. Know what I mean?

    Reply
  181. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:59 am

    @well:Rolling on the floor laughing my a$$ off.

    Reply
  182. BigApplette said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:59 am

    @Courtney:
    You say Jen is orange from all the tanning. You are purple from drinking all the Jolie p.r. Kool-aid.

    Reply
  183. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 10:59 am

    @bettieboop:Yes I do. And it’s going down now.

    Reply
  184. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:09 am

    @Keane:

    I think Trevor is the philanthropy advisor and does just that and Geyer Kosinski is her manager who she’s always been with and who also reps BBT as well as other.
    I think Trevor is doing his job and doing it well. He works with others in Hollywood as well and it seems to work. It’s just that she’s doing it all for image, deflection etc.
    Just the fact that he’s worked with Bill and Melissa Gates (Bill has done much better than I ever thought he would do in the philanthropy world largely due to the influence of Melissa and his parents) is pretty respectable.
    I thought it was Geyser who got her the Salt trilogy probably as “Well” said to get what she can now before it all goes away.
    All JMO

    Reply
  185. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    @ well – that is almost identical to my experience and very interesting indeed. She also used her real name on here, commenting under “AngelinaJolie” and for quite a lot of time employed a rather bizarre strategy of writing in very bad French (presumably getting someone to write it for her) thinking that this would somehow prove she wasn’t the real Angelina Jolie. If you go back and look over former threads you will see it going on for pages at a time. I don’t think its so much her now, I think she has people doing it for her, they have a different tone of voice. But yeah the commenting under my name thing was very stupid on her part, it is a crime both in the US and here. I reported it to the police and they said if the hacker can be traced then they can charge them for it. The difficulty is tracing it of course. I made it very clear what I had done on here and that I would not tolerate any infringement of my privacy and she backed off. She did however post some song lyrics to the effect that she was the all-seeing eye who knew everything about me and was gonna get me or words to that effect. They weren’t directed at me or posted under her name but it was clear who they were directed at. Problem is I’m not easily intimidated. In fact if someone tries to intimidate me I tend to come out fighting twice as hard. And re: the credbility thing, problem also for her is that I’m an Oxford graduate, another detail she doesn’t like at all. And half of my friends are lawyers and others are serious journalists, I’ve consulted a couple of them already about what has been going on here. Can I just ask though, did it never occur to you to go to the press with that? Because it has occurred to me. Is it just that you can’t prove it was her?

    Reply
  186. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:16 am

    @Keane:

    And just to add. JA’s younger brother is adopted so she knows a little something about opening her heart to adopted kids.

    Reply
  187. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:17 am

    @ g – yes but Kate had a suspicion that he might have been fired from the Gates’ gig or it might have been the Clintons, yes I think it was them in fact. Just something she heard, not sure if its true. I was just wondering how his credentials really stacked up…

    Oh and thanks for the explanation of the acronym one and all, I knew it must be something along those lines but could never figure out what – ha ha!

    Reply
  188. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:18 am

    @ g – aw I didn’t know that. If that had been AJ’s brother we’d have heard about it until she was blue in the face – ha ha!

    Reply
  189. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    @well:

    So if she’s so demented are we to believe anything that Ian posted that came from her camp e.g. the whole Toni chronicles?

    Reply
  190. justhelping said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    @well:
    Well, you rock. You know you have supporters here.

    Reply
  191. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @Keane:Re: going to the press, it just hasn’t been the right time, and it’s taken me a long time to get to a place where I’m strong enough to not only face this, but also strong enough to face the impending shit storm that will follow me when I go public with this.

    Reply
  192. Angie's Fax Machine said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @well:
    Wow. It sounds like you could write a book on her, too.

    Her past is coming back to haunt her. I hope it’ll be one big collective expose coming from all angles… not just one person. Everyone she’s hurt in HW should put their 2c in and create a huge insurgence PR assault on her ass. And not just in book form… but tabloids, internet, TV (humanitarian work), newspapers, etc.

    Reply
  193. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    @Keane:

    And one more thing. Does this seem like someone who cares way too much about her personal appearance?

    http://www.starmagazine.com/jennifer_aniston_recessionista/news/15557

    Reply
  194. well said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:30 am

    @justhelping:Thank you. Really, that means alot. If you only knew. If you only knew what she has done to me. Thank God for good therapists and strong constitutions.

    Reply
  195. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    @ well – well that sounds pretty crazy! So you definitely will go public with it? I’ve contacted someone actually re my experience, though I’m not sure whether anything will come of it. For me I couldn’t really prove it was her so I doubt it could go to press. I have forwarded on info about what has been going on here though to someone who I think may be interested in the light of some recent articles. Your experience sounds much more serious than mine though. Jesus!

    Reply
  196. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:41 am

    @ g – I couldn’t trace that link but that argument about Jen Aniston is and always has been totally bogus. The woman is allowed to take care of herself. She’s allowed to do yoga and go to the hairdressers and get facials god dammit, how many women don’t? And the person they’re comparing her to is someone who has changed everything about her facial features (and her body too) through major surgery? Jesus, if the loons had brains they would be dangerous. Oh and the bit about her being “orange” through tanning – wow that’s just disgraceful, again has no-one thought about bringing back stoning for this woman?! Good Lord.

    Reply
  197. Canuck said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:42 am

    @Keane:
    If it has been AJ’s brother, maybe she’d have gotten him to “unadopt” himself and married him!

    Reply
  198. bettieboop said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:48 am

    @well:
    Damn.

    Reply
  199. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    @ Canuck – yes the mind really does boggle doesn’t it! Sounds like sex is the only way she knows how to relate to other people! Its very, very odd…. JMO.

    Reply
  200. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:50 am

    @Keane:

    Just funny that Star picked up and show 2 pics of her wearing the same outfit 2 weeks ago as 10 years ago (the red baggy pants, flip flops). It’s on Star Mag home page. Here’s what it said

    What goes around comes around for Jennifer Aniston!
    Though any designer would just about die to see her in one of their pricey designs, she sticks to what works. Jen stepped out in one of her favorite casual looks in NYC on April 29 — but it’s a decade old! Why not just splash out on trendy jeans or a sexy sundress? Jen says she has no need for flashy new duds.
    “I admit I love clothes,” she explains, “And I buy clothes. But they sit in my closet. I like a pair of comfy pants, flip flops and a T-shirt.”
    In these tough times, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!

    Reply
  201. g said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    Funny I was thinking the same thing as I was reading here. Just gather up info from all the people here and you’d have a good start to a book. I’d love to see someone do a serious, investigative book. Just don’t know if this Morton guy will do it properly. This calls for more like a Woodward/Bernstein investigation.

    Reply
  202. Patty anne said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    Didn’t someone report that Brad is under the care of a psychiatrist now? Perhaps that is what all this fragmented behavior is about; emotional breakdown. He appears to be undergoing tons of pressure, and unable to find “rest”. However, responsibility for one’s actions is part of being an adult; he created this atmosphere, now he must deal with it. I do wish that he would handle his relationship problems with his baby-mamma without draging Jennifer into yet another Bermuda Triangle of which she always seems to be the butt of ill comments. Of all three of them, i believe Jennifer has suffered the most, consistantly these past four years. If Brad would “fix” his current partner problems and then come to Jennnifer with an apology and perhaps attempt to reignite the flame of love they once shared, more the better. Otherwise, imo, he’s doing to AJ, the same thing he did to JA.

    Reply
  203. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    @ g – yeah exactly, she actually really dresses down and is quite casual, nothing like Angelina “I-wear-skintight-dresses-to-pop-to-the-shops-Jolie”! And re: what you said about a book, I have actually said that myself. There are actually enough articles and info out there, just on the surface to make a great book. The thing with Ange is she has managed to deflect and bury all the bad stuff and negative comments with all the pregnancies and adoptions. THat has been her PR strategy in my view. But just from reading here I’ve found out so much stuff about her that when you put it all together is completely damning. There’s a wealth of stuff on her out there that the gen public just does not know about. It needs to be put in a coherent whole. Interesting.

    Reply
  204. Guest said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    The necklace he is wearing is NOT the same as Jen’s at all. Here’s close-ups of those very pictures used by In Touch.

    http://tinyurl.com/dfdx5h

    http://tinyurl.com/ceglq6

    Reply
  205. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    @ Patty Anne – yes I could see that re: what you say about Brad’s behaviour and being under the care of a shrink. And the “emotional breakdown” thing has definitely been rumoured about him.

    Reply
  206. too curious said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    @well:
    Well, just wanted to add a little moral support for you. :) I cannot imagine what hell this evil woman put you through, but you are wise to make sure you are strong enough to handle the shit storm if you take it public. And though I want to see her taken down, no one should have to be victimized a second time to do so, would be great if someone powerful would take her on – maybe BP will. I’m pretty much a wimp but if someone messed with one of my nieces or nephews (by blood or ties of friendship) I would have done the same thing. I agree that she appears to be a sociopath. Since she uses her kids just for PR it shouldn’t be that surprising that she wouldn’t care about other children, either. Wouldn’t be surprised, if there was someone with a camera around other than her tame paparazzi, if there are photos of her being unkind/abusive/dismissive of the poor and downtrodden in the countries she visits as part of her St. Angie humanitarian PR junkets. As always, this is JMHO.

    Reply
  207. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    @well: . [I threatened to kick her ass because she made my beautiful 3 year old niece cry by brutually chastizing her because she couldn’t take the girls giggles about her uncle.] . That doesn’t surprise me. The worst thing you can do to a troll is make them feel diminished w humor. They feel trivialised and that’s NOT the kind of attention the want. And the DO want attention. Trying straight reasoning goes no where. Putting them on the receiving end of jokes is always best in my experience. Plus it’s fun. I’m sorry you had to suffer so much at the hands of MsCrazyass.

    Reply
  208. Monks said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    Why the fuck should Jen clean up his mess ,hell fucking no let him stay with Angie half dead ass.They have kids and that will only cause Jen more hurt to have to deal with, not only Him but she would have to put up with the hold ratpack.I say noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.Jen is lovely and should have a man without the ratpack. I dont care if he made a mess,what that has to do with Jen.Jen dont take that mess back hell nooooooooooooooooooooooooo,lol
    For real ,noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    Jen your not a door mat or a clean up after shit woman,noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    Reply
  209. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @Keane:

    i think Trevor probably bailed by now. It has seemed to me that Trevor is primarily an international / business, “strategic philanthropy” advisor than a PR/entertainment advisor. He is (was?) AJ’s advisor on “international affairs” but ended up make statements about much more than that, so maybe she sucked him into her vortex for a while. He was responsible for changing Bill Gates’ image from a billionaire weirdo nerd to “the biggest humanitarian on the planet.” He’s involved in some interesting stuff (APCO worldwide, Saflink, Global Philanthropy Group…. i don’t think any of that can save her now.

    Reply
  210. Keane said on May 6th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @ sinker – he is her publicist, that has been stated explicitly in the media before now. Its just that she kept it on the downlow for a long time because she likes to project the image of being above the whole PR game. Nothing could be further from the truth of course. Kate says that Trev brokered the deal for Salt for her. I think he’s very much still on her payroll and I’m not sure yet how “kosher” the guy is. Kate has more info I think.

    Reply
  211. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    and Well, thanks for all of your contributions to this thread. hope it all works out in the end.

    and to Courtney… anything JA has or may have done pales in comparison to purposefully depriving a child of a safe, stable, home with loving caretakers. there is no doubt in my mind that AJ has FAILED miserably at that. and no doubt in my mind that she has used those children to further her career and finances.

    Reply
  212. sinker said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @Keane:
    got it — and so i agree with you — he has made a mistake of epic proportions!! his career has probably taken a major hit. no pity here.

    Reply
  213. Gitano said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    IDK = I don’t know? Wouldn’t IDK = I do know and IDNK = I don’t (do not) know!

    Reply
  214. p said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @Monks: . Not to mention his way of handling his angst is in itself a glimpse into the nature of the relationship he’d be offering her, if it ever came to that, isn’t it? What with all the young hotties he’s turning to. I think the classic “female” self delusion sounds like this…. “well he’s only doing that now bc I’m too precious to him and he’s saving all his desire for when he’s truly free, clear-headed and can honor OUR relationship. All these other ones don’t mean anything. It’ll stop once WE’RE together.”

    Uh huh.

    Reply
  215. Edward Bitsoi said on May 6th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Uh dis must be a joke haha. no way Brad Pitt is gunna like dat ugly grl Aniston over hottie Angelina Jolie. Uh you know dis is just some lies spread by Jennifer cuz she’s so jealous of Angelina. Her and her friends like dat ugly Courtney Cox is just gunna say dat to try an start trouble between Brad and angelina. Uh there aint no way haha dis is true. Ppl are tryin to make it sound true by sayin some of Brad Pitt’s friends are saying dat to but hahaha dey aint. Dats just more bs tryin to make it seem real by lyin an sayin oh yeah Brad’s bros is sayin it to. Ugly goofy lookin old Jennifer Aniston who is 40 or older is just mad dat she was used by dat singer and no man wants her.

    Reply
  216. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @well:
    bb14

    May 3rd was the nite of the Chris Cornell concert so if that was the same nite as AJ says that Brad was coming in to Albany to watch the fight on Television was she lying?????

    Reply
  217. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    @well:
    bb14 Is there any proof that he was in Albany or just her word for it.?

    Reply
  218. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @Liin:
    bb14

    Don’t forget Australia we are 18-20 hours behind the USA, we are the worst in the different time zones

    Reply
  219. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Guest:
    bb14 Are you sure they look the same to me but then again Jen’s in partly covered maybe

    Reply
  220. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    bb14
    I am new to this post but have put some comments at one time or another. I do not have the input that you people have on BP and AJ living in the same Country I guess helps, We receive very little news on them as you may have gathered. I am from Australia
    I think Ian is doing a great job on reporting on all of these exclusives that he puts up for us to read, don’t get me wrong I love reading all of your comments you people are the greatest. I did read the article on Brad and Jen meeting in the magazine “In Touch” and I do believe what it said. But if hasn’t saved his relationship with AJ (and who would want to) by now then he never will from what I have read she wants to go alone now bloody good job.
    In relation to Jen, I would love to see her back with Brad, ok true there would be problems to sort out . I remember seeing Brad in an epsoside of Friends god, he looked gorgeous in that, but since leaving Jen and gone to AJ his looks have gone he looks like an old man. I think Jen would bring him back to reality and shape him up back to the way he was he needs that and he would want that. I really believe that he is still in love with her and misses her, you could see that at the Oscars the way he was staring at her, even AJ noticed it. It has been stated many times that she will always love Brad, even when she married him she has said that he was the man she wanted to spend the rest of her life with and she believed her marriage would last. If she feels the need to go back to Brad and she loves him enough then things will work out for them. I have been divorced for 15 years and I would rather climb Mount Everest than go back to my ex I loathe the guy but then that’s just me.
    I think what we need is Ian to get an exclusive from Jen now that would be interesting. JMO
    Sorry for taking up so much space.

    Reply
  221. Astro said on May 6th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    Brad Pitt – Allegedly refers to Jennifer Aniston as ‘Nurse Ratched’

    http://www.examiner.com/x-7494-LA-Gossip-Examiner~y2009m5d6-Brad-Pitt–Allegedly-refers-to-Jennifer-Aniston-as-Nurse-Ratched

    Reply
  222. benjaminbutton14 said on May 6th, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    @well:
    bb14
    Stands for I Don’t Know

    Reply
  223. benjaminbutton14 said on May 7th, 2009 at 12:26 am

    bb14. I just read somewhere that Brad and Ange left the set of :Salt: together apparently E has it on video.

    Sounds a bit dodgy as to what is going on. Did Brad go and see Jen after visiting the Salt set or not?????

    Reply
  224. rotorua said on May 7th, 2009 at 3:51 am

    @well:
    That’s good to hear. And i know everyone’s on another thread, and some people may be questioning you. I say- please keep posting!!! i really like hearing from you and i think a LOT of people here do, too!

    Reply
  225. benjaminbutton14 said on May 7th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    bb14 Was there any doubt that Brad was not at the Chris Cornell Concert.??? I received a photo from Pitt Watch showing me a photo of Brad backstage with Chris’s daughter. She goes on to mention that this photo is proof that he was there.

    Reply
  226. mary ann said on May 9th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    I’d love to see and read the news about getting involved between Jen and Brad for their second chance to reunite.They might not be a couple but as a good friends sharing and caring just for the old sake…I think living with the woman thats involves producing kids to make it popular is quite heavy for brad and life is not easy racing kids especially when they started to wonder whats going on to their lives…When brad met Jolie he had so much affection and blind for her stunning beauty that lead for cheating and in the end he realize how he make a big mess and perhaps he wanted to go back to Jen arms by the moment he need someone to lean on and that he could find jen is the best mate.

    Reply
  227. carrie said on May 9th, 2009 at 11:55 pm

    Brad doesn’t deserve anything from Jen including friendship. He is lower then dog shit and not good enought for her and he never was. Not even getting back at Jolie would be worth the crap Brad would bring in to Jen’s life. And by crap I just mean himself.

    Reply
  228. Stormy said on May 28th, 2009 at 1:36 am

    How RIDICULOUS can people be??? I hope Jen takes her pampered pup and FINALLY finds a man that she has something in common with and people get the heck OFF of Angelina and Brad’s back… you can’t “pick” who you love… if you want to be happy in love — it usually means following your HEART… not the local yokels who THINK it’d be “cute” if they got back together… [gag]

    Reply
  229. jillybilly said on January 3rd, 2010 at 4:27 am

    Jennifer Aniston is gay. Help her come out of the closet and have a full and loving life.

    Reply
  230. Brenifer 4 lyf!! said on January 14th, 2011 at 11:45 pm

    OMG i really hope this is true..
    Brad and Jennifer were the best and yes he did screw up his life by choosing Angelina over her
    xx <3 Jennifer..
    i will always stand behing Jennifer no matter what happens

    Reply
  231. [...] IUC Exclusive: Brad Pitt tells Aniston

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

May 2009
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Meta