Comments on: IUC Exclusive: Brangie Friend Part III – Source Says Jen knew about Brangie’s Affair for months and did nothing to stop it

By: kathy

kathy — Fri, 08 May 2009 06:42:51 +0000

‘“Brangiffer” have lied all these years to the public and media.’ The truest statement ever made about them.

By: uncle tom

uncle tom — Sun, 03 May 2009 02:33:04 +0000

Damn that bitch is ugly. Go to this site and check out Louise Glover. She looks way much better.

http://infamoustimes.wordpress.com/

By: benjaminbutton14

benjaminbutton14 — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:18:22 +0000

@Kikumon: Hi, I read in an Australian magazine that he was staring at her like a kid seeing fireworks for the first time. There is something definately going on I hope that they get back together.

By: Z

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:02:09 +0000

@Patty anne:
I didn’t know this…that all makes sense. I’d be pretty unhappy about that.
Or Jenny S….who has spoken to the press before….so it’s a pattern.

By: carrie

carrie — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:05:28 +0000

@Liz E.:The media will pick up on any negative story about Jen because she didn't cut deals and pay them off like Jolie and Pitt did. I hope she doesn't care, but it still sucks. I have never seen a woman who didn't harm anyone get treated the was that she does. If I were her I'd wish I'd never meet Brad SHitt!

By: carrie

carrie — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:02:22 +0000

@Mama San:Jesus guysm isn't it obvious? Holly is Jolie's surrogate. She gave birth to one or both of the twins.

By: Nicole

Nicole — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:27:31 +0000

@sinker: My point is they aren't really being abused. We don't live in their home ,we can base speculations and wild ass assumptions off pics and work schedules. I would suggest you visit and volunteer around children who are being neglected. Lastly, you have no clue if these kids are happy nor do I . But, I'm sure since everyone is rushing to make tell-alls0 then, that probably would have been the first thing they stated was that they neglected the kids.

By: Patty anne

Patty anne — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:23:42 +0000

@g: No , don’t forget Holly. Somewhere here i posted information about the time Holly emailed Entertainment Tonight announcing the birth of the twins; Brangelina hotley denied this birth date, and claimed it was an imposter who had emailed ET with this “Lie”; however, an executive at Entertainment Tonight personally KNOWS Holly, and thus had her private contact number, which they used to verify the story WITH HOLLY! Then the broo ha ha began with more press crying out at the Lie pertrated against the holy ones….imposter!! Holly disappeared shortly after that In Her Face embarassment. Tossed to the wolves. Two weeks later, the second birth announcement was made. Holly has very good reasons to be highly pissed off at both of her “long time ” friends for hanging her out to dry….if she is Toni. JMO….but the dots do seem to connect….after all, Jolie has not many long time female friends does she? In fact, name three?

By: Liz E.

Liz E. — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:10:16 +0000

I forgot to add that Jason Donovan’s trial was really all about proving he was heterosexual and that the homosexual allegation was a lie despite what he tried to claim then and even now. Donovan’s career took a real nosedive following that trial because he was forever branded as a homophobe and lost la ot of his fanbase. What was the homosexual allegation called by Donovan? A poisonous slur. That’s not a term used to describe lying – that’s about being labeled gay. Poor Donovan – he sunk into drug abuse and a bad period following this.

========

I understand, Kate, that this gets out beyond this website. That’s why unfounded and nasty gossip really is poisonous. Not just about Jennifer but also about Brad and Angelina and Michael Jackson and Nicole Kidman and on and on. Perhaps the most unforgivable is unfounded gossip about children and claims or speculation that they are not their father’s child or that they are not loved by their parents. That is so wrong. I am no fan of Tom Cruise or the crazy Scienos but I can’t imagine writing that he doesn’t love his child or that he is deliberately using her for publicity or that Jennifer Garner is using Violet for publicity because we see her practically every damn day with Violet. That’s the reality of these celebrity’s lives. They have to go out and the paparazzi prowl everywhere in LA or where they suspect a money making celeb will be. They are seen everywhere because people want to see them. Because people make millions of dollars off their photos and stories (which I am sure are probably ALL made up).

I know you seem really upset about Ian’s allegations of Jen’s homosexuality but I would bet anything she is laughing her ass off at it if she is even aware of it. These people learn to ignore this gossip no matter what the gossipers want you to believe. It’s in their best interests to make you believe they matter and their gossip stories matter. They don’t. For most of them, surely the Anistons and the Pitts and the Kidmans and the Jolies, their lives are a lot bigger and above this gossip. In any event I don’t see it as an insult to Jen. You may believe Ian but I don’t. I truly believe there is no Toni.

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:39:17 +0000

@Liz E.: Except it was not just on this site, and now it will be the gospel . It has made Just Jared and Lainey happy I know. She won't sure though, but she is probably trying to stop Ian at this point from posting whatever information from her side he was going to put up already..