Sugar Ray Ramone Catone (The Bronx Bi-Blogger): BP and JA Hook Up In NYC

Posted on April 25th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

Cherry trees…Yankee hippy…deserted monastery…intended effect…straddling dilettante…Central Park statuette…owed it to posterity…The Baster sprinkled with Salt…mongrel bitch…wore a monocle…centrifugal existence…endowed and misty…gay Butler…just like JM…bewildered shepherd…ardor and vitality…repatriated soldier…thumbing her nose..Brangiffer…Long Island lighthouse…pederast and pale…damp basement…junkhouse jealousy…pneumatic drills…too rocky for picks and shovels…illegitimate kitty litter…Brangiffer…strange rituals…Clambake…like Elvis or Steve McQueen…ex tells Brad to run fast…drive at 200mph…who are the brain police?…sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramba!

*****UPDATE***** J.A. Day On Monday – Not To Be Missed!!!

                                                                                         Te Amo, SRRC

  1. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    Brangiffer,you got to be kidding me!

    Reply
  2. bettieboop said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    What does that mean, Brangiffer?

    Reply
  3. Jinxy said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    He always seemed to smile so naturally when he was around her. I’ve never seen that happen with Jolie.

    I have no idea what this riddle means though.

    Reply
  4. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    Brad and Jennifer =Braniffer

    Reply
  5. Jaguar said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Gay Butler = INtouch Magazine had an article last week about Jennifer meeting up with Gerard Butler who is rumored to be bi/gay.

    Reply
  6. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Please say there are pics floating around of the hookup..lol.

    Reply
  7. Astro said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    Great. I got it all. I am happy, everybody is happy and friendly.

    Jen went to Long Island house of Brangie, of course Angie was agree. Jen met the kids at the house. Now Angie, Brad and Jen are great friends.

    The next chapter for this. We can see Angie, Brad and Jen having a dinner in NYC.

    Angie you are amazing.

    Reply
  8. bettieboop said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @Kate:
    It says Brangiffer. There is a g. Oh please not the three of them. Wait, maybe discussing something? AJ doesn’t seem like a rational person to discuss something.

    Reply
  9. bettieboop said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    @Astro:
    LOL

    Reply
  10. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    No. Not Brannifer.
    Br-ang-iffer. All 3 of them.

    Reply
  11. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    @Astro:
    Well, that’s one way to look at it I guess.

    Reply
  12. shiteatingrin said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    @bettieboop:If Brad ever hooked up with someone named Helen, their ‘name’ would be Head.

    Reply
  13. bettieboop said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    @shiteatingrin:
    That is fucking great!!!! LOL!!!!!

    Reply
  14. Jaguar said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    Look at that pic of Brad above, I had almost forgotten he used to look that good.

    Reply
  15. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    ex tells brad to run fast.. drive at 200mph…who are the brain police? Trying to get away from paps, paps figured out where they were.

    Reply
  16. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    gay Butler-just like JM
    G. Buttler is gay like j.Mayor is. Another Beard for JA I see.

    Reply
  17. section9 said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    Not ANOTHER threesome!

    Reply
  18. Different Guest said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    Clambake was a movie with Elvis, 2 girls one guy. Illigitmate kitty litter – something about the kids isn’t legal, adoption and/or paternity?

    Reply
  19. curandera said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    Oh my! a triangle once again “brangiffer”… Not surprised coming from HW..thanx for the distraction on all this.. Kate, Keane and CGardener… such fine observations..May the truth be told with this circus and in HW. That is what time it is for many..we have entered a new era.. truths are surfacing.. can’t hide anymore. If one is not living in “integrity” it all backfires as the truth comes out. This is on all levels of being for everyone.. It is your choice.
    Freedom is just around the corner.
    All this drama will be irrelevant with major pandemic on the way guys..back to reality..
    Brought to you by “baxter labs” via vaccines….Ian that is one major story to break ..as this evolving “swine flu” outbreak can cause a major pandemic that would rival the “spanish flu” inquisition killing millions. search for Dr. Deagle….God bless everyone..

    Reply
  20. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Did sugar ray just change it? I hate it when he does it.

    Reply
  21. Astro said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    @bettieboop:
    @cuze:

    LOL, too….See you later…I am going to a party now, you know: I will celebrate this great news.

    You Know, Jen is the friend of everybody. Good girl.

    Angie, Brad, Jen and the kids….HUMHUM…I am hungry for the picture.

    Reply
  22. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    @Astro:
    No, Angie was at the at the Waldorf giving Clinton a blow job dear, she does not live with Brad any longer. Please do not shoot yourself.

    Reply
  23. Jinxy said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    Oh no! Please tell me Gerard Butler is not gay….he is my sleb crush

    Reply
  24. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    @bettieboop:
    I see that, hmm..but I think that means Brad and Jen talking about her…

    Reply
  25. sama said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    the title above is bp and ja hook up not bp, ja and aj hook up?

    Reply
  26. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    “wore a monacle”

    The monocle did, however, garner a following in the stylish lesbian circles of the mid 20th century, with lesbians donning a monocle for effect. Such women included Una Lady Troubridge, Radclyffe Hall, and Weimar German reporter Sylvia von Harden (the painting Portrait of the Journalist Sylvia Von Harden by German expressionist painter Otto Dix depicts its subject sporting a monocle). (Wiki)

    Reply
  27. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    @shiteatingrin:
    LOL…that’s funny.

    @Jaguar:
    I know, Jag. I watched the video of him on Friends and was almost shocked at how awful he looks now…I knew it, but the change is drastic.

    Reply
  28. bettieboop said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    Something seems different. Damn!

    Reply
  29. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    What do you mean Bettieboop?

    Reply
  30. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    “centrifugal existence” – Jen and Ange are rotating around Brad. He is the sun at the centre of their existence.

    Reply
  31. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    “repatriated soldier” – someone is being returned to their homeland following a war. Does this mean Brad is returning to Jen?

    Reply
  32. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @cuze:
    So who are the brain police?
    And bewildered shepherd?

    And can someone translate…google translate stinks…lol
    sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramba!

    @Kate:
    @sama:
    Phew! I really can’t imagine JA hooking up with AJ at all…not when she knows she’s crazy.imo.

    Reply
  33. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    “If one is not living in “integrity” it all backfires as the truth comes out. This is on all levels of being for everyone.. It is your choice.
    Freedom is just around the corner.”

    As a Christian … I couldn’t agree with you more. Amen.

    Reply
  34. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    O.k.
    cherry trees-cherry blossom festival has started in Brooklyn

    Reply
  35. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    @Keane:
    Interesting idea, Keane!! If I were him I would want to go somewhere nice and comfortable….after all the insanity and chaos.

    Reply
  36. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    @Togi:
    I’m not an organized religion person, but completely agree with this. Karma, baby!!!

    Reply
  37. annonymous said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    @curandera:

    fiction becomes reality…look at the map on baxter labs website too… just a clue?

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0553383582/emeraldcity0d0

    Reply
  38. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    The “Central Park statuette” has to be Alice in Wonderland doesn’t it?

    One large sculpture depicts Alice, from Lewis Carroll’s 1865 classic Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. The statue is located on East 74th street on the north side of Central Park’s Conservatory Water. Alice is pictured sitting on a giant mushroom, reaching toward a pocket watch held by the March Hare, host of the book’s tea party. Peering over her shoulder is the Cheshire cat, flanked on one side by the dormouse, and on the other by Mad Hatter, who in contrast to the calm Alice looks ready to laugh out loud at any moment. (Wiki)

    Reply
  39. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    “pedarast”

    Pederasty or Paederasty (pronounced [ˈpɛdəˌræsti] (American) or [ˈpiːdəˌræsti] (British), is an erotic relationship between an adolescent boy and an adult man outside his immediate family. Traditionally and according to modern usage, pederasty refers only to erotic relationships between two males. (Wiki)

    Reply
  40. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @Z:
    It probably wasn’t meant to be, but honestly, it was a very nice post! Lol. “This on all levels of being for everyone” — everyone in the world, no matter what your belief. See! EVERYONE can contribute.

    Reply
  41. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    @annonymous:
    I have Lyme disease and would not be surprised at all if this came from a lab….also man-made. Probably one reason so many government types are denying the severity of it.

    http://www.amazon.com/Lab-257-Disturbing-Governments-Laboratory/dp/0060011416/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1240683667&sr=1-1

    Reply
  42. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Keane:
    Funny you would mention that, Keane. Look at the picture SR used. BP is looking off in one direction, JA is looking up … at either BP or the photo of AJ … with a Cheshire cat grin on her face. That’s what I thought when I looked at the photo. AJ’s alone now, on the outside looking in … JA is with BP.

    Reply
  43. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    Anyone know what the Spanish translates to exactly? I know its something like two gay people reuniting – Brad and Jen?

    “sustantivo” means sustantive which means something that exists in its own right….. not sure what that means though, anyone?

    Reply
  44. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    @Togi:
    LOL…I don’t know if it was meant to be nice or not, but you know what goes around comes around, I have to believe. I’m not religious, but spiritual…another long story…lol.

    Reply
  45. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @Keane:
    Another great thought Keane! Yeah!

    Reply
  46. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    Anybody have a dictionay?
    I just looked up pederast does he mean child molester or just homosexual.
    dilettante means something like a amatuer artist or something. I hate these stupid SR RC posts.

    Reply
  47. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @Keane:
    I remember this from the Hair album I played as a kid…lol.

    Reply
  48. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    @ Togi – yes it seems to be about that doesnt it? Well, well done Jennifer is what I say! Although there seems to be a lot more going on here. Think we have only scratched the surface so far…..

    Reply
  49. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @Z:
    My dear … you have Lyme’s disease??? God Lord woman! Hope you don’t mind if I PRAY for you! (It doesn’t hurt, honest!) Lol. You’re my kinda girl … we would get along famously I suspect! Interesting how INTERESTING folks are. And don’t we all have those looooonnnngggg stories! XOXOXOXO

    Reply
  50. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @ KvK – a dilletante is a lover of the arts, usually an amateur, someone who enjoys the arts without being an artist themselves I would say. A “pederast” used to refer to a homosexual relationship between a man and a younger boy but now just means a relationship with two men. I think the fact that it has been used here specifically though tends to suggest the former as otherwise he could have just said homosexual or whatever.

    Reply
  51. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    @Keane:
    Yes … because look at the poop eating grin on AJ’s face, too. And the “duh” look on BP! Hilarious, Sugar. Scratching the surface? Dang … this is one of the crazier SR blogs.

    Reply
  52. hehehe said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    this is THE funniest site EVER!!!
    Whom ever is running ths shit fest is taking everything u guts say & is turnng it into ‘BREAKING’ news!!! I so love how u all eat it up & keep it running with all your theories! When this ‘Dickwad tells u all it’s a fu*kfest I wanna b here!!!. Angie & BP(idiot of the century) have hired their own personal photog 2 capture all- they r leaking alll this crap then having their personal phtog capture the oppposite-losta mulllah!They r telling Iamn one thing, disputing it with photog evidence 7 making a fu*king fortune!! Read between the lines idiots hehe

    Reply
  53. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    Thanks Keane, I ain’t that good at book learnin’.

    Reply
  54. Constant Gardner said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    @curandera:
    OT but all hail to you for mentioning Baxter. Weaponized flu. Pay attention folks.

    Reply
  55. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    “Cherry trees” – is this a reference to the Brooklyn Botanical Garden?

    Reply
  56. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    Hi all – I know I am too literal and have no imagination (which is why I love your comments so much!) Does Long Island have a light house? Did something happen in the lighthouse? What do you think?? :_) (I just learned the smiley face thats why I do it so often – sorry, lame I know.) and of course everything in the past present and future that I say or even think is always and forever more just my opinion :-)

    Reply
  57. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    Is this date relevant:

    “Sakura Matsuri, the annual cherry blossom festival, scheduled for May 2-3.”

    Reply
  58. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @Togi:
    Folks are interesting!!! Love to read about people… Yep, 20 years. Lyme disease is a nightmare if it isn’t caught immediately. Pray away Sweetheart!!! I was on antibiotics for 6 years or so…I’m still sick…anyway, I could write a book, but won’t here. lol.

    Reply
  59. symbol said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    conjuRo or coNjunto, probably a typo.

    Reply
  60. Ray Catone said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @Keane:
    most relevant, Brad was spotted by my pap friend driving his motorcycle there with a woman on the back three days ago. It wasn’t Angie!

    Reply
  61. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    @Togi:
    Dear Togi – I just read your posts on the other threads and my heart goes out to you for what you endured and survived.

    Reply
  62. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @Keane:
    It conjures up images of the Potomac for me. You know … all the spy movies on the Potomac, with the cherry tree blossoms in the back ground.

    Reply
  63. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Wow! Was it Jennifer? Or someone else? Can you describe her? How do you know it was a “her”?

    Reply
  64. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Keane, you got a hit! But the festival doesn’t start for a few days….

    Reply
  65. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Me too. Very much so.

    Reply
  66. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Thank you. I love Z and my late night chats! I don’t consider myself a “survivor” though. I wouldn’t be who I am today if it hadn’t happened so I am actually thankful it did. I like who I am … and wouldn’t want to be anyone else. ;-)

    Reply
  67. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    @Togi:
    Someone wrote a cherry festival was happening in Brooklyn…this Sakura Matsuri is at the Brooklyn Botanical Gardens.

    Reply
  68. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    Oh, so now Catone gets all specific. datd and location. Does the pap friend have a picture?

    Reply
  69. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    @Togi:
    You have got an amazing attitude Togi!!

    Reply
  70. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    yankee hippie.. must be jennifer

    Reply
  71. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    yeah. i wrote about the festival.

    Reply
  72. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    Then you got a hit, too!!

    Reply
  73. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    What a nice chunk of change for the pap who gets the pic of these two, eh?

    Reply
  74. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    Is the architect Brad is obsessed with called Frank Lloyd Wright? If so “Yankee hippy” could be a reference to the murder of Dr Victor Ohta adn his family in 1970. He was very wealthy, materialistic and had a house desgined by a disciple of Wright. The house was found burned down and the family and his secretary bound by the silk scarves Ohta loved and executed with a pistol. There was a note left on one of his cars saying:

    “today world war 3 will begin as brought to you by the people of free universe. From this day forward, anyone or company of persons who misuses the natural environment or destroys same will suffer the penalty of death by the people of the free universe. I and my comrades from this day forth will fight until death or freedom against any single anyone who does not support natural life on this planet, materialism must die or mankind will.” It was dated “Halloween 1970″.

    Not sure if this is relevant?

    Reply
  75. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    The Baster sprinkled with Salt…obviously refers to AJ and JA’s movie.

    Reply
  76. Ray Catone said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Girlfriends, he’s been driving around the area the past few days. My sources are prime. A worker preparing for the festival confirmed my pap sources story, saying “there was a man and a woman on a bike driving around”. This story stands tall.

    Reply
  77. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    @ Togi – I totally missed the posts of yours Z is referring to, you’ll have to fill me in sometime x

    Reply
  78. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    @Keane:
    I do believe I have read somewhere that he does indeed like Frank Lloyd Wright. Good one!

    Reply
  79. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    “damp basement…junkhouse jealousy…pneumatic drills…too rocky for picks and shovels…illegitimate kitty litter…”

    I think SR means that to get to the bottom of this “JUNK” it is going to take a DRILL (or a professional). Picks and shovels (every day people) can only touch the surface. JMO

    Reply
  80. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Keane do you work for Ian?

    Reply
  81. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    @Z:
    Haaa haaa. Never been to the East Coast. I am completely East Coast illiterate! Thanks.

    Reply
  82. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    @Togi:
    You make me cry. Your inner strength and lack of bitterness is humbling – I would be out for revenge.

    Reply
  83. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    @shiteatingrin:
    Look, you do not know anything about Brad or Angelina or Jen, so stop the deflection, I get what you are doing. I just want to take time to say this to all these so called inside friends or this trio..first let me qualify this with, as I have many times, “I do not know any of them at all, never met them, I am not a insider,I do not work for Ian”

    You , all of you , pretending to be in the “inner circle” would be wise to remember that every word you say is in print, and all three of them and anyone that really does know them, like say a , oh I don’t know, likes someone who works with them, PR, studio, interviews, travel, secuity, or whatever, knows when you are straight up bullshitting when they read this shit, and when they have known them ,or some of them for over a decade you are making a fucking fool out of yourself. No one on the outside has those intimate details. Only their closet friends and family, but what gives you guys all away are the things you stumble over, that you think are not important, the smoking gun, that would hang your ass .

    Did it ever occur to any of you that one of these people that know them might be relaying this to them? Do you know just how silly you sound grouping blinds and rumors that you have heard through the grapevine together and pretending you know, but “I just can not tell” ..

    I am not suggesting I have been told any of this, I am just trying to tell you this is how it goes down, and I have seen and heard it at dinner about other stars many times, on stars in general. FYI but feel free to ring up your friends Jen, and Brad and Angie and ask them to come chat with us…

    Cheers!

    Now, you dear, seem to be BFF with both Jen and Angie. Were you part of a quad?

    Reply
  84. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Is the “deserted monastery” the Namgyal Monastery in Ithaca, New York – a Buddhist monastery which offers spiritual retreats? Did Brad go there on his own for some spiritual cleansing or with the new bit of stuff for some intellectual romancing? Which ever it was it has the “intended effect”, so either he romanced her as desired or he got his spirit cleansed!

    Reply
  85. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    @Keane:
    According to my limited knowledge, a pederast is an older man who introduces a much younger man into the homosexual love – think ancient Greece.

    Reply
  86. Chelsea said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Long Island has many lighthouses, the most well known one being the Montauk Lighthouse, on Montauk Point (The End as LI’ers refer to it =] )

    Reply
  87. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    If so, is it this weekend (April 24-26, 2009) or 2 weeks ago I’m guessing April 10-12?

    Reply
  88. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    @Keane:
    Here I go: or is “cherry” a virgin (think pederast) and “tree” refers to an aroused man?

    Reply
  89. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    There is a long island lighthouse called Execution Rocks Lighthouse.

    Reply
  90. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Naw … wanting revenge would only further hurt you. IMHO, the best thing is to come to the point where you refuse to allow something to steal from you more than it has. When you let it go, it loses its power over you. Anger only hurts the person who feels it, not the person it is vented towards. So it’s a form of self-abuse. I refuse to play that game with the Devil. He lost on Calvary to someone FAR greater than he.

    Reply
  91. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    @Togi:
    Ooops … I meant to write “far greater than ME!!!!!” LOL

    Reply
  92. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    Is the “straddling dilletante” Brad or his new main bitch? I get it though, he’s been romancing her by taking her round to all these cultural events: the cherry blossom festival, the monastic retreat, the statues in Central Park – he’s romancing her with intellectual things right? And who’s looking after the kids I wonder? The bloody nannies I suppose. Its disgusting.

    Reply
  93. shiteatingrin said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @Kate:Ugh. Forgive me for trying to say my piece (and peace). I’m not bs-ing, but now very sorry I even attempted to convey what I know. Gheesh.

    Reply
  94. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @cuze:
    Why?

    Reply
  95. Chelsea said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    a list of all long island lighthouses:
    http://www.longislandlighthouses.com/

    Reply
  96. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    So do we assume the new main bitch is Jen then? It does refer to her after the romancing bit. Brad is mainly with “the baster” (Jen) right now, but he still has to see Salt (Ange) now and again to sort out the kids and the divorce etc?

    Reply
  97. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Ray u r sooo full of caca it’s unbelievable!!! U r feedinf off all these poor ppl’s input’s! I am personally a result of sexual abuse, U r using this shit 2 get hits u should b utterly ashamed, u r THE lowest person on earth.

    Reply
  98. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    @Keane:
    Relevant or not, that is fascinating.

    Reply
  99. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    I don’t think “Brangiffer” is a reference to a threesome, its a reference to the state of play of their relationship at this point in time. Brad is still a bit with Ange and a bit more with Jen. Its a bit of a mixture still, the intermediary stage. But Brange is on its way out and Brannifer back in?

    Reply
  100. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Could cherry trees be referring to Washington?
    Deserted monastery = Brad having sex again with someone (JA? YEAH!)
    Intended effect = Getting together again was good for BP as she intended
    Straddling dilettante = Brad isn’t working at the moment (living like a dilettante?)
    Owed it to posterity = making it right again re Jen?
    Wore a monocle = paparrazzi with a telephoto lens?
    Bewildered shepherd = Brad, as he now is the father of a flock and obviously had little clue as to what he was getting into with AJ
    Ardor and vitality = JA made him feel like a man again
    Thumbing her nose = JA to AJ, (LOL)
    The brain police, good thing you didn’t say “spelling police” or I’d take it personally after a comment left with Ms. Nine Cents ;) The only “brain police” ideas that come to mind is either a jealous woman who scrutinizes every word and movement of her man out of jealousy, or the PC types who want to change the way you speak because you might offend someone.

    I’ll take a stab at the Spanish, as it is often close to French…
    Substantial (solid?), the coming together of reunited gay (bi) people?

    Reply
  101. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @ladybert62:
    why what? lol

    Reply
  102. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @cuze:
    Yes – I think in my trying to catch up on the history of AJ and BP, I learned that for some birthday or special event AJe had arranged a special tour for BP of a house that Frank Lloyd Wright had designed.. :-)

    Reply
  103. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @cuze:
    Yes, He and AJ were photographed outside of Falling Water (I think it’s called) in PA…..Frank Llloyd Wright’s home.

    Reply
  104. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    “Mongrel bitch” – Jen is not a purebreed, i.e. she is not purely hetero or homo, she is bisexual i.e. mongrel. The wearing of the monocle I think implies her lesbianism.

    Reply
  105. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    @Keane:
    Good grief … I don’t know where my mind is this morning! “The Baster sprinkled with Salt…mongrel bitch…”
    I thought of “baster” as in TURKEY BASTER … which is what is often referenced as Artificial Insemination. Sprinkled with Salt would mean inseminating Salt’s “egg” and then the mongrel bitch. Mongrel is a reference to a dog. Dog bitch is a female dog.

    Reply
  106. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    @Keane:
    Right. It’s the TRIANGLE … as it has always seemed to be.

    Reply
  107. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @Keane:
    I think it may be a reference to Brad and his architectural dalliances.

    Pitt, Jolie Celebrate Birthday at Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater in Pennsylvania

    http://tinyurl.com/chezf7

    Reply
  108. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @Togi:
    Hmmm, that makes sense.

    @Togi:
    You are right about the Potomac, The Tidal Basin near the Jefferson Monument is the place of a huge Cherry Blossom Festival every year. I lived in and around DC for years.

    Reply
  109. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    This Long Island lighthouse – could it be somewhere designed by Frank Lloyd Wright? Does the pederast refer to a reltationship between him and Brad at some point?

    “pneumatic drills” might refer to gay sex too.

    Reply
  110. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    @shiteatingrin:
    I am listening to what you say – I find it interesting – Kate might be having a migraine again – just is just being protective of the info being presented on the site – in my opinion of course. So dont go away. Thanks.

    Reply
  111. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Is that why all of a sudden there are stories out about how Jen is hiding in her room, never going out because she is afraid of running into Angie in NYC? Deflection?

    Reply
  112. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    @Keane:
    Except SR says “too rocky for picks and shovels.” So … you need one of those big hydrollic (sp?) drills to bust through the JUNK.

    Reply
  113. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    @Canuck:
    I am thinking I read somewhere (here maybe) that she had increased security as well. If Ian was threatened, just imagine the threats JA might receive. Yikes

    Reply
  114. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    @shiteatingrin:
    I just want to say, what you wrote on the other post about Borderline personality and the other stuff you wrote sounds right to me…I know nothing of their personal lives, but it’s a gut feeling. Esp. reading about different mental disorders. Peace.

    Reply
  115. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    If BP is banging JA again whose having all this gay sex?

    Reply
  116. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    @Togi:
    I can well imagine. Stalked by Brangeloonies, now that would be very very scary.

    Reply
  117. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Sorry for my bad typing and phrasing today – am having my own migraine! :-)

    Reply
  118. Ray Catone said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    @Canuck:
    precisamente

    Reply
  119. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    @Chelsea:
    Cool web site, Chelsea.

    Reply
  120. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    Are the strange rituals maybe AJ trying Voodoo on JA ?

    Reply
  121. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @Canuck:
    I like these!

    Reply
  122. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Woohoo! :)

    Reply
  123. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    @cuze:
    I think you said earlier that the Yankee hippy had to be Jennifer – so I asked you why you think that. Thanks.

    Reply
  124. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @Ray Catone:

    The Baster sprinkled with Salt

    Spys from the Salt production getting onto the Baster set?

    Reply
  125. Gitano said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @annonymous:

    It’s faint on that book but does it resemble the logo for the Trilateral Commission?

    Reply
  126. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I do too, even though I have no idea if any of that is right or not. Now, how great would it be if the “making it right” bit included taking JA to Cannes, hehehe

    Reply
  127. Putznasher said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @Keane:

    Frank Lloyd Wright’s then girlfriend and her children were killed in 1914, not 1970.

    Reply
  128. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    Frank Zappa wrote a song called ” Who Are the Brain Police.”

    Reply
  129. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @ladybert62:
    No I do not, she has lied, and Ian has confirmed that to me.

    Reply
  130. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    Junkhouse jealousy = AJ is enraged like a junkhouse dog?

    Reply
  131. Соска said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    За душу берет)

    Reply
  132. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @Kate:
    Although I will add, he did not need too, I knew she had lied -otherwise.

    Reply
  133. Ray Catone said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    @Canuck:
    Angie will be posing with Brad at Cannes – they won’t “officially” split till 02/02/10

    Reply
  134. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    Missed that one.
    @Canuck:
    And if so, would that make AJ the mongrel bitch?

    Reply
  135. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    Why the reference to Elvis or Steve McQueen? Both are dead and Steve McQueen rode a motorcycle – after that I draw my usual blanks…

    Reply
  136. mooki said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @Keane:

    so did Marlene Dietrich.

    BTW, I saw this coming, Brad and Jen Round 2.

    Reply
  137. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:33 pm

    @Canuck:
    You guys are sucked into it because you do not understand what exactly her goal is and why she did it. It is a simple deflection of what IAN is reporting right now. JMO

    Reply
  138. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Drat! That would have been such poetic justice. Thanks for the info Sugar.

    Reply
  139. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @Kate:
    Yikes! Thanks for the info.

    Reply
  140. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Why that date? Seems an odd date to spilt,and right before Jens birthdate?

    Reply
  141. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    @Kate:
    Maybe it’s a birthday gift? It does seem odd though, not a beginning of a month, not a Monday, not a slow news week Friday night… when does AJ’s film come out in 2010?

    Reply
  142. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    @Kate:
    Maybe I’m just a romantic at heart, lol Too many Disney films as a child.

    Reply
  143. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @Kate: Maybe he wants to be public with Jen on her next birthday? God, one can only hope. Does seem like a long damn time though to get one’s freedom.

    Side note, here’s a list of LI lighthouses, with them marked: http://www.scroope.net/lighthouses/longisland.htm
    5, 7 & 8 are in the immediate vicinity of the home AJ & BP rented. #6 is no longer there, I don’t believe.

    Reply
  144. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    Isn’t Feb.2 (2/02) groundhog’s day?

    Reply
  145. DebFrmHell said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    I still believe that they are already split despite the photo ops that have been going on. I think that we keep seeing Brad out with the boys as a pre arranged weekend dad kind of thing. You never see Brad with just the girls in tow. And as for the grocery store photos, ANYWHERE else might have been a little more believeable. They will continue to be in each others lives because of the kids. All the other drama, is just that. Drama. Just another family that is trying to make its way thru the trauma of separation or divorce if they were truly ever married. Difference is that they have the whole internet (world? LOL) doing the speculating…

    Reply
  146. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    straddling dilettante
    Central Park statuette
    owed it to posterity

    A statuette is a small statue so I’m thinking one like the Prospero and Miranda statue

    http://www.lovetoeatandtravel.com/site/US/NY/Fun/central_statues.htm

    Scroll down a bit; on the right.

    Somehow he thinks he owes it to Jen to make things right?

    Reply
  147. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @Kate:
    Although what I had in mind was that if it gets out that Brad is driving around with some woman on his motorcycle, the story is already out there that she hardly leaves her room. The rest of the guesses, well yes, I have seen too many happy ending Disney movies.

    Reply
  148. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Canuck:

    The Baster is due for release April 2, 2010… possibly to stir up a couple months of publicity?

    Reply
  149. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Dang. Nothing like milking their “brand” for all it’s worth and who cares what happens to the kids, eh?
    Stupid, stupid, stupid. Though, I suppose the kids CAN be sheltered as long as these two behave civilly.
    Why, SR will they take so long to split? What is the hold up? And why the specific date- what’s that about?

    Reply
  150. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    Ray is not real 7,u r all being led astray, wake up dickheads!!!!! I seriously don’t believe u can be strung along 4 so gog damned long!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  151. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    This sounds like a bunch of HORSESH-T to me.

    Reply
  152. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Okay I see why you are saying that, but is this an educated guess, are we to be subjected to another round of campaigning for IB and Tree of Life, because she will not have anything out? So what if he is nominated and they announce the split, people still have to vote, right? That pushes it out to March 2, 2010. It is basically done at that point. IB is not receiving good reviews at right now from those who have seen the early screening, and he definitely is not. Brad wants that Oscar, but having her on his arm, is going to keep him from getting it. He will lose again, and she will be part of the reason. He would have a better shot if he goes solo now and gives everyone time to accept it. That is a year away, ridiculous plan imo. Was not a good Oscar role for him anyway, his accent sucks, not enough action. I know it is anticipated at Cannes, but from those who have seen it , thumbs down for Brad.

    Tuesday, December 1, 2009: Official Screen Credits forms due
    Monday, December 28, 2009: Nominations ballots mailed
    Saturday, January 23, 2010: Nominations polls close 5 p.m. PT
    Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater
    Wednesday, February 10, 2010: Final ballots mailed
    Monday, February 15, 2010: Nominees Luncheon
    Saturday, February 20, 2010: Scientific and Technical Achievement Awards presentation
    Tuesday, March 2, 2010: Final polls close 5 p.m. PT
    Sunday, March 7, 2010: 82nd Annual Academy Awards presentation

    Reply
  153. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Kate – I see on the other thread, that Ray gave you the #5 – “baby burning rubber” award!!

    Reply
  154. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    @Kate: Kate, I’m a bit lost… I’ve seen a couple of your posts and I’ve gone back and tried to find what this is all about (forgive me, having problems with my right eye and it’s swollen badly, having a hard time seeing). Would you please explain to me what this is about? ty

    Reply
  155. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    @Kate:
    Hmmmm. A little over 9 months from their date in the lighthouse????? Or the “Baster” procedure????

    Reply
  156. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    @ladybert62:
    ah didn’t see that, no, not to me, that is to ALL of us, we all worked on that together. well done done everyone!

    Reply
  157. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    @Peri:
    What are you referring to ? this riddle?

    Reply
  158. QuietOne said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Just a question and a thought from left field. Is the previous post from HisHighness regarding Toronto a clue? JA and BP supposedly met up in Toronto in September. Have JA and BP been seeing each other since their meeting in Toronto?

    Reply
  159. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    KvK, do you know if Zappa mentioned who they are?

    @Kate:
    Kate, what is the lie? Will you tell us?

    Reply
  160. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    @ladybert62:
    The #5 baby burning rubber award. What the heck is THAT? Which thread was it LB62? Lol

    Reply
  161. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Hey SR, how do you know the specific date? Or why that date?

    Reply
  162. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    @Z:
    Z … look at Kate’s post up a few comments. I think she’s definitely onto something!

    Reply
  163. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    Gotta go … family life is calling! I’ll catch up later. As always … it’s been a pleasure! :-)

    Reply
  164. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    Wonder what’s going to happen to that date if they get caught before then? Since they have been spotted by a pap a few times already.

    Reply
  165. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:06 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    Whoa! Good catch….repeating…isn’t what that movie was about? Things repeating themselves in life? I don’t have a 2010 calendar.

    Reply
  166. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    @Kate:
    No, hon… I was lost as to what you were saying to ’shiteatingrin’… I went back to a previous thread and found a bit about it (where he/she is saying basically BP is sterile and AJ had IVF three times).

    What do you mean by deflection? (If you don’t mind explaining.)

    Reply
  167. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    I’m just going to say that I’m disappointed with Clinton. I hope Chelsea bitch slaps her.

    Reply
  168. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Ray, Ian , womever the fu*k u r , stop stringing these poor ppl along!!! U r pathetic! enough is enough, do your study without involving innocent ppl! You didn’t start with this crap until you knew you had willing naive followers but this has to stop! It is totally against UNDERCOVER investigation what u r doing. I will personally try 2 stop u if u don’t own up 2 the BS u r putting these innocent ppl through! Most of them r just ppl bored with life that want 2 have fun ‘discovering’ things, but u have gone WAY overboard!, stick 2 the honest facts, with PROOF attached. That is what undercover journalism is all about- THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  169. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    I agree…I keep thinking of it as Le Stoppe & Shoppe….lol…making upscale (haha) and a bit more believable…LOL.

    Reply
  170. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    @Fan:
    That’s interesting…what is the story behind that statue?

    Reply
  171. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    @Togi: Dear Togi – I am still so new at this – I dont know how to reference it using a number – it is the posted dated 4/23/9 entitled “Los Infieles” (spelling probably wrong) – the post that starts “Glassy eyes ….” and then much speculation about the wild Saturday night orgy at A-Rod’s etc – anyway, at the very end, Kate gives an incredible explanation/interpretation of his entire post and ends her comments by asking Ray to grade it – #5 being the highest as in “baby burning rubber” – which he did and which she got!!!

    Reply
  172. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    @asshat:
    How the hell would you know anything about journalism? You can’t even spell your words out.

    STFU.

    Bet you can understand that.

    Reply
  173. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    What worries me about the kids is that it seems they are basically being raised by nannies…who can come and go from their lives as chaotic as these people are. It they let the nannies raise them, then I hope they at least keep them it their lives for a good long time. jmo.

    Reply
  174. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I’m new here, but already I know Kate rocks. I am too literal, I have a very hard time deciphering the clues and hints, but it’s fun to try.

    Reply
  175. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    @Kate:
    I agree, he would do better to split now and hope people forget he was with her. (fat chance, but anyway)

    Reply
  176. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    @ladybert62:
    What is this? Sounds fun anyway. : )

    Reply
  177. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @Togi:
    Ah….. Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater

    Reply
  178. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    @Fan:
    Oh my – Prospero and Miranda is it? Keane can probably do this better than me – but here goes: Shakespears’s The Tempest about father (Prospero) and daughter (Miranda) talking on the beach after a storm (Tempest). He is trying to explain her past to her and how much he loves her and cares for her wellbeing and that he is trying to help her – if I recall correctly, she is enlightented by his comments and comes away from the conversation with a new respect for him? Keane? What do you think…

    Reply
  179. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    U STFU dickwad, if u believe the shit posted here u r the one who needs help, I have been here everyday for about 2 mths & ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY NOTHING has been confirmed & ALL of u regular posters have BELIEVED it 2 b truth!! ASK REAL questions-GET REAL answers- then make up your minds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  180. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    @Peri:
    Because Ian said that Brad is the father of 2 bio kids, and he has adopted one child, this other person is trying to claim that Brad is not the bio of any kids. She came first acting like she hates Angie and is Jens friend, said Jen took her under her wing, explaining that Brad could not be father cause he has slow swimmers yet Jolie instead of using his sperm bought sperm , uh huh. so in essence, saying he is not the father of any kids, so now she is not just Jen’s friend she suddenly seems to know all about Brad and AJ to , and what AJ was up to as recent as late Ocober 2008, but, she and Jen have not been in touch for a long time…no sorry. she is just trying to deflect. Only a fool would believe she bought sperm and got pregnant while Brad was married to Jen and she knew this.

    Reply
  181. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @Z:
    Personally, I think I prefer the nannies to raise them instead of Ms. Angelina (or even BP for that matter)!

    Reply
  182. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    @cuze:
    A pap should expose them, print the picture imo, and it makes no sense why they would not do that..unless they could not see who the woman was..

    Reply
  183. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

    @Z:

    Sorry I don’t know it’s history.

    I don’t think this is about a hook up in the sense of getting back together, it’s about Jen helping Brad to get out.

    Reply
  184. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    @Peri:
    LOL well said.

    Reply
  185. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    @Peri:
    Me too – I am way too literal and believe me when it comes to these posts (Expecially lovely Sugar Ray’s), I am so lost I am in a fog :-) The comments here are great; I have been having so much fun – the comments are so enlightening about so many things. It is like a BIG and complicated puzzle that we all work on together!! I love this place, it is addictative :_)

    Reply
  186. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    @asshat: *just chuckling* No one said you needed help, dear, but since you brought it up… Been here every day for two months have you? But you don’t believe anything, do you? *chuckles some more*

    @Kate:
    Thank you for the explanation, I understand it now, and have to say I agree with your points. IVF could still make use of “slow swimmers” so definitely no sense in buying sperm.

    Gotta love trolls. They’re everywhere.

    Reply
  187. Jaguar said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Z:

    And Jolie looks much older than her stated age as well, for example I believe she and Drew Barrymore are around the same age. Jolie looks about 10 years older.

    I’m so sorry to hear you have Lyme disease! And don’t get me started about the man-made disease and viruses debate, I absolutely believe there is a huge government and/or big drug companies involvement there.

    Reply
  188. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Z:
    yes, that was why I posted all the dates. now that makes no sense to me because, then they have to wait another week for everyone to vote, so that would be a very bad time to announce a split imo, once the votes are in, okay , nothing left to lose, it is sealed, but that is not until March, almost a full year away.

    One year from now, so why the hell are they signing any papers at this point? Something is not adding up on this???

    Sugar Ray, are you speculating the Feb 2, 2010 ? There is so much shit out there on them he should just say she is filming and go to Cannes alone, then split, IB does not premier to August.. he has a movie to make in SA if he is still doing it ..maybe he is going to drag the whole family down there.

    They are all crazy, but I am guessing someone has a source that is off somewhere…jmo

    Reply
  189. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    According to a reviewer at Amazon, Brain Police are a pre-fabricated reality. The song is on the album Freak-out.

    Reply
  190. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    @Peri:
    They have been using this tactic lately, first Jens friend ,then they sneak something in about Angie that is is negative, and on a side note contradicts the story at hand. , and then they do it the other way, AJ. then Jen. They always include both.

    Reply
  191. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    @asshat:
    Do any of the gossip sites EVER confirm anything? No… besides if you haven’t got that likely IAN is using this website to drum up interest for a future book, you might want to think about that now. Judging from the content here, it’s likely to be either a Brangie expose, or perhaps about the workings of the media re: the fans. Who cares? It’s entertaining, it’s like doing the cryptic crosswords, playing Scrabble against a smart foe, and deciphering poetry, plus they say that mental exercise helps ward off mental slowdown related to age.

    Me, I’d like to see Jen and Brad get together again, but if they don’t, it’s not the end of the world. I’d like to see AJ get her comeuppance, but if she doesn’t, it’s not the end of the world either. I’d particularly like to see those kids be somewhere stable because they need that.

    Reply
  192. Jaguar said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    @Canuck:
    Absolutely – these sites are just fun and games for me, kind of like a good mystery where you hope to see the villain get what’s coming to them in the end.

    I agree, the kids need to have some kind of stable parenting and I hope they get it but it doesn’t look likely.

    Reply
  193. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    @ladybert62:
    More re Prospero and Miranda – am going to hit the books on this one – The father Prospero was also a magician (isnt that what actors are to some extent) and he had tried to protect his daughter Miranda from a rape by Caliban – thats all I recall right now, Shakespeare here I come!

    Reply
  194. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    @Соска:
    Hugh? translation please as I dont speak Russian (looks like Russian or Slavic to me)…

    Reply
  195. HisHighness said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @Canuck:
    Three books will hit the stands in the next 120 days. They are tell alls. Thanks for your support.

    Reply
  196. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    @Togi:
    You are right and a better person than me – enlightened I am not and even though revenge is as old as mankind, it does have its own satisfaction. Obviously am not a Christian or Buddhist! Atheist through and through! :_)

    Reply
  197. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    oaky well I have not even really looked at this, but there was a second pregnant woman, the sudanese and then another one. Jen is doing the Baster. I am not sure this is really saying they are getting back together or she is just befriending him. I think she helped him get the goods on AJ at the party. They are in cahoots and it probably makes her feel good to be able to do that. They are both bisexual so maybe they are coming back together. So as someone else suggested, could Jen be the other pregnant one? Now if she were the 2nd pregnant one that would mean she had just found out she was so at least 6 weeks, and SR indicated to Keane that the date was very important (of the festival?) so that pregnancy would term approx Dec or so, but what of the 2nd one was a plan , and to get a 2nd one pregnant..if she got pregnant in April then the baby would be born by Feb.

    Okay that sounds crazy… lol too far out there I guess , and besides Brad has slow swimmers lmao

    Reply
  198. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    @QuietOne:
    I will have to read that one – I completely ignored it…

    Reply
  199. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Sign me up! :)

    Reply
  200. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    @HisHighness:
    IAN are you writing one of them?

    and do you happen to know if SR is just speculating that they will announce the split on the day the nominations are announced or if that is a definite plan?

    Reply
  201. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:54 pm

    @Kate:

    Jen’s not pregnant Kate. She has work piling up. After the Baster wraps she has two weeks off then starts shooting The Bounty Hunter with Gerard [sp].

    Reply
  202. Jaguar said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    @HisHighness:

    Is Mickey Brett still doing his tell-all or did the J-P’s pay him off?

    Reply
  203. HisHighness said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Kate:
    I’m penning all three. They are exposes that will rock unchartered boats. Not sure about SR’s dates. I heard they’re in the process of doing the paper work right now.

    Reply
  204. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Canuck:
    Picture me Clapping for you Canuck! (Is there a cure little icon for that image) :-)

    Reply
  205. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    @Fan:
    I know , but people work around things all the time in films when they are pregnant. CZJ filmed Chicago pregnant. Long shot ,lol just for fun.

    Reply
  206. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @HisHighness: YIKES – I can hardly wait – will I be able to get them on my Kindle (pretty please – as I have arthritis in my hands and books – especially hardbacks are painful) :-)

    Reply
  207. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @HisHighness:

    That is terrific, can’t wait to read all of them. I have to say, I can not imagine IAN, how they can possibly stay together until Jan 2010 after your book is released, and just in time for the twins birthday ! That should be a blockbuster reveal…great timing. I know libel laws are tougher though for books.right?

    Reply
  208. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    @HisHighness:
    I hope that all three are by you, and that they are all hits! Care to give us a few more details on exactly who or what you will be telling all about, or is that top secret still?

    Reply
  209. HisHighness said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Yes, I believe they’ll be published also as E books. Thanks for your support. Cheers!

    Reply
  210. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
    yep probably more & under diff names, Find it very amusing, think that Angie & Brad have hired their own photog, leaking info to whomever , then THEIR photog (who happens 2 b in the right place, right time), snaps the contradictory (sp?) snapshot, to disspell all romours. They r fu*king smart these 2′ 2 smart 4 all of u & IAN!! They r leaking crap Ian (darling that he is ), he reports it, they contradict it in photographs, (by their hired photog), make heaps of money coz the photo’s r now worth more to dispute the breakup rumor – whalla, they all get what they want, can u c it??????

    Reply
  211. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    well,well,well
    I tell you one thing. I aint gonna sit here for 120 days deciphering this sh-t when I can just wait for a dang book. I’m outta here.
    good night and good luck ladies and gents!

    Reply
  212. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I like that he used the word exposes- lol

    a: to make known : bring to light (as something shameful) b: to disclose the faults or crimes

    Ha ha

    Now anyone got any ideas how they will keep this facade on after IAN’s book is released?

    Reply
  213. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate – you are great – your brain is always explosive with ideas! This is truly intriguing and does explain nicely some of the ideas mentined by you and others..

    Reply
  214. HisHighness said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    @Canuck:
    I promise they’re all explosive. I can’t divulge subjects because the books are embargoed and I could forfeit my deal if I do so. I won’t dissappoint – you have my word! These will be my last non fiction works. After that, I’ll concentrate on film, the blog and return to producing Off Broadway plays. You can check an excerpt of my last play here at http://www.amfmstudios.com/27heaven (I am playing sax in the clip). Again, I thank you all for your incredible support. You have been amazing!

    Reply
  215. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

    @ladybert62:
    That has got to be it. Jon Voigt’s cry for help for AJ.

    Reply
  216. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    @HisHighness:
    YIPPEEE YIPPEEE YIPPEEE

    Reply
  217. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @Kate:
    That’s a really good point, after the books come out and assuming one of them is about Brangie, it’s going to be very hard for them to pretend from thereon in that all is fine in Brangie-land.

    Reply
  218. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Thank you HH!! We love when you come on in the posts!! I’ll go check your link.

    Reply
  219. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    let me kiss your ass HH Mwah, mwah, mwah lol, Fuckw*t

    Reply
  220. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Cool, Ian!!! And I love the sax!!

    Reply
  221. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @asshat:
    You’ll notice that Brad started complaining about the Paps at about the same time that they stopped being able to CONTROL the media coverage, and instead started having to REACT to it. Those pix in the airport in Japan with the twins were obviously the response to rumours that were saying there was something very wrong with the twins, and that was why they hadn’t been seen in public.

    Reply
  222. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    @asshat:
    Go away ASS hat.

    Reply
  223. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    HH u r so full of SHITTTTTTTTTTTT, u make me LAUGH

    Reply
  224. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    @Canuck:
    Exactly…those airport shots looked so completely staged….as most of their pics in the last few years.

    Reply
  225. Kikumon said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Damn this computer………Haven’t caught up so forgive me if this has been posted Corpus Christi Monastery – http://www.bronxop.org…….The Bronx is Yankee turf…..There are other ones up in the Bronx also…..

    Reply
  226. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @Canuck:
    “Who cares? It’s entertaining, it’s like doing the cryptic crosswords, playing Scrabble against a smart foe, and deciphering poetry”

    So agree, one reason I love this site….

    Reply
  227. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @ Putznasher – no I’m talking about Dr Victor Ohta and his family, not Frank LLoyd Wright. They just happened to live in a home designed by one of his disciples. I thought it might be some type of metaphor, probably not though.

    Reply
  228. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    @Z:
    Me too, love the sax! Can’t wait for all the books, I love to read .

    Reply
  229. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @Keane:
    Hey Keane, how dare you leave me here fight the idiots alone. Now I do have a migraine.!!

    Reply
  230. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @HisHighness:
    If the content of this site is any indication, I’m sure they are going to be very entertaining reads, and I sincerely hope that one of them is about Brangie. Can’t wait!

    Quite a leap from investigative reporter to Off Broadway producer. Plus you look pretty cool playing that sax, lol

    Now back to the subject… how long before Brad dyes his hair blond again? :)

    Reply
  231. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    @cuze:
    Yeah, if it’s true then maybe he is psycho about sex. He doesn’t seem to be in general….but when it comes to sex, he seems to be off his rocker.

    Reply
  232. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    Book 1=Bangaloonie
    Book 2=Everybody ‘cept your Mom is gay in Hollywood including John Wayne
    Book 3=IUC exclusive The untold story of the owner of CirQue de Soleil nasty divorce-Not For Sale in Canada

    Hey Ian you suck. My mom’s got better gossip than this site.
    Hey you guys hear that one about La Lohan IUC exclusive=Lindsay likes Chicos y Chicas- vamanos muchacos besame mucho te quiero Taco Bell.

    get a new gimmick b-tches!

    Reply
  233. anna said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Cherry trees…Yankee hippy
    sugar capitalized these so Cherry refers to Pitt (cherry pitt) and Yankee refers to Jen. The next couple phrases implies they did the deed and it worked out as planned. They are back together and riding motorcycles.

    Clambake is capitalized followed by Elvis Presley. Elvis starred in a movie called Clambake. now what was that movie about?

    Reply
  234. Billi2 said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Three books coming out why am I not surprised. Certainly interesting bit of news.

    Reply
  235. anna said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    also… gay Butler …Butler is capitalized so must refer to Gerard Butler is gay

    Reply
  236. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Oh yeah! Definitely…just saying hope they have the consistency of the same nannies (if they are good). If there are revolving door nannies that is just one more unstable thing in their lives. So not good.

    Reply
  237. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    If you hate it here so much, why don’t you just stop coming here and commenting then?

    Reply
  238. anna said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    @anna:
    Hello!? Anyone?! Feel free to add to my posts…lol

    Reply
  239. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @Peri:
    Hey Peri, I’m having a having time believing ASShat was here 2 months and never said a word….seems she can’t shut up…and as far as needing help…it’s obviously not you….lol.

    I see what Kate is saying too…Kate is this what Ian confirmed? I still have to agree w/ the AJ being Borderline, tho. jmo.

    Reply
  240. BigApplette said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Just wondering, could Brad be using Ian to float some insider info to get Jolie to relent a bit in her position with regard to custody and visitation? Could it be a subtle threat that her secrets are being exposed, albeit without confirmation at this point, and more could come if she decides to play hardball? In return, Jolie is using her contacts to float items about Jen and Brad. That could explain the conflicting time lines and stories. Any thoughts on that from the decrypting geniuses on this site?

    Reply
  241. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    @Jaguar:
    Thanks, Sweetheart! I appreciate the support. It is just such a drag. And yes….in this country and other parts of the world money rules. And the drug companies have way too much f*ckin power. It all makes me so sick!! Check this out:

    http://www.undertheeightball.com/

    This documentary should be awesome.

    Reply
  242. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    @Kate:
    Yes, I completely agree…it just doesn’t make sense to wait that long….KvK (I think) mentioned this is groundhog day….so is it a joke about the movie – things repeating themselves – like the relationship w/ ja and bp??

    Reply
  243. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    Could the Long Island Lighthouse comment refer more to the purpose of a lighthouse than any specific place? After all, they are built to help ships avoid crashing onto the rocks and sinking. Is Jen the lighthouse for Brad? That may tie in with the picks, shovels and pneumatic drills, the rocks in this case being Angie and the fact that if Brad is to come out ahead, he’ll likely have to pull out the big guns.

    Reply
  244. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    @Canuck:
    LOL Brad , I have always agreed with you, 10 years younger blond and blued eyed yes, ha ha

    Ian is the jack of all trades lol

    Reply
  245. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @Kate:
    There was that item somewhere about Jen wanting to get prego and be a single mom.

    Reply
  246. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    @Canuck:
    Great idea!!!!!!

    Reply
  247. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    @HisHighness:
    So cool! Sign me up, too…and thanks for your input on SR’s dates.

    Reply
  248. Canuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    @Kate:
    I’m trying to imagine “Baster sprinkled with Salt” hair, something that I’m having a really hard time doing. Maybe that means he’ll go bald from the stress, lol

    Ian looks to be a talented guy. Those books are going to be veryyyyyyyyyyyyyy interesting.

    Reply
  249. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    First of all,Ian told us at least 2 months ago that there were going to be 3 books coming out, so why are you getting all huffy. It was just unspoken if he was writing one, which we all knew, which is why we kept telling everyone this part of the research for that. Again, people not really understanding the blog, not really reading everything, and jumping to conclusions. We have said over and over, that Ian does not make his living off of a blog. He has done Broadway in the past, he had made film in the past, and he has written books in the past. This blog is a way to bring tips in, discuss it , weed it out. Great research tool and a way to see what people want to read. Keane , I know has said this at least a dozen times, I have mentioned it a few ,and Canuck has at least 3 or 4 times. Yet , here we are, someone acting like they have been taken. Do people read or skim? You have been pretty involved and happy to be so up to now? Just an observation K& K and you have been fun to post with, so I am perplexed at the change of attitude,if that is really you.

    Reply
  250. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    @ Kate – sorry hun, was having a long phone conversation, now am back to the matter in hand! Quick warning to all:

    PLEASE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT ANYONE WHO COMES ON HERE AND SAYS THEY KNOW AJ, BP OR JA ARE FOR REAL WITHOUT INTENSIVE INTERROGATION. IT IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT ANYONE WHO KNOWS THEM WELL IS GOING TO POST ON HERE, THEY WOULD HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PURPOSE IN DOING SO. IF THEY WERE LEGI THEY WOULD AT LEAST GIVE AN OUTLINE OF WHO THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY DO IN THE INDUSTRY AND KATE AND I AND OTHERS WILL BE ABLE TO TELL VERY QUICKLY IF THEY’RE WHO THEY SAY THEY ARE OR NOT. SO FAR NO-ONE HAS BEEN. KATE AND I HAVE BEEN TACKLING AJ’S PR TEAM TRYING TO DISSUADE PEOPLE FROM READING AND BELIEVING WHAT IS WRITTEN ON THIS SITE THE WHOLE TIME. THEY OFTEN CHANGE TACTICS AND THIS IS THEIR MOST FREQUENT ONE. THEY ARE TRYING TO DISTRACT PEOPLE FROM THE STORIES IAN AND SR HAVE COME UP WITH WITH SOME RIDICULOUS MADE-UP NONSENSE. TRY TO IGNORE THEM, IF THEY ARE GENUINE THEY WILL STICK AROUND, IF NOT THEY SWIFTL DISAPPEAR. HOPE THIS HELPS.

    Phew, now I’ve got that off my chest, back to the post!

    Reply
  251. azzy said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    If Brad And Jen are together again, is this their plan all along? That Brad could go and make babies, then
    get back together with Jen, coz Jen cant get pregnant?

    Reply
  252. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    @Kate:
    Me too…I just looked on Amazon. Here is one…looks like it came out April 6 of this year:

    Hollywood Undercover: Revealing the Sordid Secrets of Tinseltown

    Ian is this one of them…or 3 more?

    Reply
  253. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    @ Canuck – because she’s one of THEM. She’s a more subtle one, but nonetheless has made it obvious. Like I said, I can’t be arsed to call them out any more, they reveal their true colours pretty damn quickly!

    Reply
  254. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Ok here it comes – my apologies to Shakespeare (and Keane close your eyes) – the only reason I am harping on this is because you think the statute is Prospero and Miranda: The Tempest is a complicated story of power in a family. Prospero (dad) and Miranda were banished to an island by Prosper’s brother when Miranda was 3 years old (The Dukedom of Milan was being fought over, I think) Prospero and Miranda lived there for 12 years. The island had spirts and fairies on it under Prospero’s control (he had magical powers). One of spirits (Ariel) had a disfigured son named Caliban. Ariel was under Prosper’s power and her son was Prospero’s slave (as in work, not sex). Caliban wanted the beautiful daughter Miranda and wanted to have sex with her and start a new race of people. Prospero believes that Caliban has raped Miranda. Caliban and his two friends try to revolt against the powerful Prospero. Miranda (who is now 15) falls in love with Ferdinand (I think this was one of Caliban’s rebellious friends) and Prospero approves of this (and seems to have actually orchestrated their meeting). They eventually all get off the island and go to Milan where Miranda and Ferdinand marry and Prospero forgives Caliban and they all are happy ever after.

    There are many different interpretations of this story: some see it as all about the power controlled by the dad over Miranda (he controls through fear) and Caliban (he controls through force) and thus evil; others see Prospero as good and benelovent.

    Oh my, the analogy to Jon Voight, Ms. Jolie and brother James are intriguing, are they not?

    Reply
  255. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @Keane:
    Thanks, Keane! I will try to remember this. LOL….

    Reply
  256. carrie said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:07 pm

    @Canuck:I think they started to lose control of the media around the time that she adopted Pax. A lot of people were uneasy about that one.

    Reply
  257. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    OKAY EVERYONE REFRESHER COURSE BEFORE WE REALLY DO THIS ONE, WE GOT THE LAST ONE PRETTY MUCH RIGHT AS POSSIBLE, HERE IT IS, SO IT IS FRESH IN YOUR MIND WHEN DOING THIS ONE-

    #
    Kate said on April 24th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    The Infidels (The Unfaithful Ones) Too Much Hanky Panky in Camp Brangie

    Glassy eyes- Angelina is on drugs, an upper like cocaine or meth…very pert butt-this could be a guy or girl …cooing with Cano- she drools over him- she makes it with him, …gobbles up Madonna’s leftovers-and A-Rod as well …raven black hair.-could be Jesus ,or could be the other baseball player ,.passion for cock…passion for pussy-she was doing threesomes that night,…fun and games Saturday night at bedroom penthouse of A-Rod- they had orgies and drugs,sex games…Cano and A-Rod take turns at the plate-she was fucked by both of them,…Johnny Cum Lately…-this may be John Mayer ,key slid in the door…-someone let him in or gave him key,home run legation…-he was there to represent Brad a favor to Jen,stuffed inside-he had a camera stuffed inside something, …big louts-he was paid off like this …Milanese money-he was …listening to James Brown-and …slithering inside-just sneaking around the party to get the goods on Angelina so this Great Saga can end which is the Bermuda Trianagle of Brad -Ang-Jen ,at this NYC party Haven- Ang had brought her brother., were they doing anything together or sharing a lover as her friend Madge has done ? , …Angie turned kind of purple…-was she embarassed because she saw JM at the party and knew he would yap about her (heads and hearts-…bisiball you bet) not sure on that- but she felt that she was here in Manhattan her …island of love-…in a world flooded with hate-that is her private haven where she goes to feel loved, have her sex like she likes it (See AFM) she has become known as the …most travelled ho in NYC-because of her …slave scenes-she loves her S & M, to be tied up.

    THIS SEEMS TO BE WHRE THE PARTY ENDS AND A NEW PART OF THE STORY BEGINS *****************************

    …Angelina has inflicted pain and mental torture on Jennifer Aniston over the last four years, she has flaunted the fact that she has taken her husband, that she has had his babies, that he loves her bodie even though it is not perfect, that he is a great dad, she has taken her parts , she has told the world they cheated , and she waved a red flag in her face daring her to say a word about it, knowing she could not because if she did, Angelina would tell the world that Jen is bisexual. Jen was forced to play along with this charade.

    Like wise now Angelina has this older man, who is Cupid Coward from Washington that she is into, that SR has told us she has the old mans money forever, to rely on. This is Bill Clinton. She has been giving him the Monica treatment, not just the blow jobs, but she has him in a “wrestles grip” he can not get out of. She is the co chair of his coucil, she works close with Hillary, Hill was going to divorce him until she was named SOS but then had to pull back. Now if he tells Jolie to hit the road, even though he is fed up with her, she can expose him, and that will ruin Hill and him, he makes alot of money, he had put this new image out, and he has no choice but to play along with her now. She is the new Jennifer Flowers.He has heart problems , which has been mentioned over and over.

    Now we are back to the boy who has a boyish face, slim body…like Zac…like a young Donny Osmond…who is awkwardly posed…looked slightly ill…and has no no illusions, I this could be John Mayer again but not sure why the reference here. What did he …sneaked a peek-of- …second bottle of scotch-why? to give him the courage to …sashay into the kitchen-
    …milk and cream…-not sure what that refers to ,but legs wrapped around…-is obvious someone is fucking, like Samson and Delilah…-

    The last part is about William takeing off in a private jet , is this Bill Clinton again, his cell phone rings and he needs to get bacl fast and furious (is fast and furious a clue to anything?) Angelina was giving him a blow jog and she was surprised ,she was down on her knees, he suddenly realized what time it was, and zipped up and dashed off.

    SR ends with saying they live in separate worlds by a huge division, open your eyes. listen. that seems to be more to Clinton than to Brad.

    I am not sure really if JM makes sense unless he is there as a paid agent for Jen to help Brad, if she is helping him and he got the video tape. He has trashed her publicly and that may be to throw off the bi rumors and to throw off the contract rumors. Just a thought.

    SUGAR RAY this is a collective effort of everyones work so can you give a shout out

    1-cold
    2-warm
    3-warmer
    4-hot
    5-baby is burning rubber.
    Reply

    Developing…..!
    Reply
    #
    Ray Catone said on April 25th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    @Kate:
    Cinqo

    @Ray Catone:
    Thank you Sugar Ray, I Know everyone appreciates that, everyone has worked really hard on this one, hours and hours! Well done guys, see what we can do when EVERYONE works together!

    Let’s Celebrate, drinks on me! Cheers!!! Kate
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

    NOW FOR THIS NEXT ONE I HAVE TAKEN AS MANY OF THE GUESSES THAT I COULD UNDERSTAND AND ADD THEM IN TO THIS GRID AND YOU GUYS SEE WHAT YOU CAN DO FROM HERE- THEN WE WILL GO BACK AND WRITE OUR LITTLE EXPOSE LOL

    Cherry trees-Cherry Blossum Festival-Brad was seen with woman on bike April 24
    …Yankee hippy
    …deserted monastery-retreat or romance
    …intended effect
    …straddling dilettante…-lover of the arts
    Central Park statuette
    …owed it to posterity (maybe owes it to Jen to MIR)
    …The Baster sprinkled with Salt-spies for Angie watching Jen
    …mongrel bitch-Jen is bisexual
    …wore a monocle…
    centrifugal existence-going around Brad , he is the center of their existence
    …endowed and misty
    …gay Butler…just like JM-Gerard is gay and so is John Mayer, just friends to Jen
    …bewildered shepherd-does not know what to do in regards to custody
    …ardor and vitality
    …repatriated soldier-Brad is returning to Jen
    …thumbing her nose-Jen to Angie
    ..Brangiffer-Brangie and Jen
    …Long Island lighthouse
    …pederast and pale
    …damp basement
    …junkhouse jealousy
    …pneumatic drills
    …too rocky for picks and shovels
    …illegitimate kitty litter-the bio kid born before they were married is not Brads, Shiloh
    …Brangiffer-Brangie and Jen
    …strange rituals
    …Clambake
    …like Elvis or Steve McQueen
    …ex tells Brad to run fast…-get the hell out of Dodge
    drive at 200mph-as fast as you can
    …who are the brain police?
    …sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramba!

    go for it, this worked last time really well!

    Reply
  258. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Thanks for doing the research ladybert. It does bring to mind Jon Voight, Ms. Jolie and brother James.

    Reply
  259. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    What is eating you??

    Reply
  260. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    @anna:
    Hey Anna, that’s what I got from that, too.

    Reply
  261. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate, here’s another thing to consider. IF AJ and BP are getting a “divorce,” and IF JA and BP are getting (or have gotten) back together, BP may want to wait for his divorce from AJ to be FINAL before coming out with a new relationship. JMO

    Reply
  262. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    @Keane:
    Keane – close your eyes when you read my interpretation of The Tempest! I cringe to think of the many little pieces that your might acerbic tongue can lash me into! :_)

    Reply
  263. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    @ladybert62:

    Well for what its worth I thought it was right on the Money.

    Reply
  264. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    “junkhouse jealousy” – Junkhouse are a Canadian alternative rock band from the 90’s. They have albums called Here Lies Happiness, Strays and Red Earth – not sure if this is relevant. They are from Hamilton, Ontario. Is this somehow a reference to Brad and Jen meeting up in Canada? That Aj was/is jealous of it?

    Reply
  265. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    @Togi:
    If they are signing papers now, and they have a 200 mill prenup, the divorce can be final in 60 days, ex Madonna unless they are going to court over the kids, and I am guessing that Brad is conceding to her. it does not take that long when a prenup is in place and when all are in agreement in custody. No point signing papers a year in advance. That date has to be off or something is. Don’t you think?

    Reply
  266. stinky-inky said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    Things to ponder:
    Central Park statuette–JA’s Emmy for Friends? The characters met at Central Perk coffee house, I think BP wants an Oscar to match
    Deserted monastery–Could this mean The Cloisters in Washington Park?
    The Baster sprinkled with Salt–two movies, I like this idea that the crews are talking amongst themselves
    Gay Butler–ah, hell.
    Junkhouse jealosy–If AJ is still using, this could be her
    Ex tells Brad to run fast–get away from insanity as fast as he can? Or run away from the paps so they don’t get caught?
    Who are the brain police–someone committing a thought crime? Or does this mean Zappa? Or some necessity (Mother of Invention)?
    jmo, btw

    Reply
  267. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    Kate – am I understanding correctly what you are saying – that Shiloh is NOT Brad’s? I thought you thought that Shiloh is his biological as is Knox but not Vivianne. Is this correct as to what you are saying? Thanks..

    Reply
  268. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    @Fan:
    sounded good to me too, so just keep adding it in to the story.

    Found this-

    Brangiffer-refers to all three of them
    …strange rituals- at Xenu maybe
    …Clambake-Operation Clambake (this is a operation that trys to out Scientology)
    …like Elvis or Steve McQueen-they were bisexual
    …ex tells Brad to run fast…-
    drive at 200mph-
    …who are the brain police?-is this Xenu the way they control them, the record they keep on them?

    What do you guys think?

    Reply
  269. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Could “strange rituals” and “Clambake” be referring to “Operation Clambake”?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Clambake

    Reply
  270. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    I think the Central Park statuette is the Alice in Wonderland one as it looks like the picture SR has posted above of JA, BP and AJ. I’m not sure quite what the relevance is though other than maybe its Jen’s party now, Brad is the Mad Hatter to her left, and Ange is the smug Cheshire cat looking on from afar. I think its just how they are now positioned in relation to one another. This post is more about Jen and Brad than AJ. The “straddling dilletante” is Brad on his motorcycle.

    Reply
  271. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    @Kate:

    Ohhh I like this:

    Clambake-Operation Clambake (this is a operation that trys to out Scientology)

    Reply
  272. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    my god- ok so u all haven’t figured the possibilty that BP or AJ have ther OWN media?? They have leaked these stories, Employed their OWN ppl to take pics- yep more money 4 them( everyone else is thinking they have split), more money 2 them coz the media are looking 4 pic’s & confirmation of THE SPLIT-there is none-but they don’t have anything 2 promote at the moment-so all news is good news. They r known 2 use whatever sources available-huh Ian is easy-There’s Your fully sourced story-then during the week after ‘outing them’, pic’s turn up 2 discard the entire theory!!!! Just really THINK about it guys-it’s not THAT hard-u r ALL being taken for a ride!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  273. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    I’d been debating posting that for an hour now, because I’m ALWAYS wrong.
    *grins at Kate*

    Have you read about those rituals??? Ohhh man.

    Reply
  274. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    “Long Island lighthouse” is Jen I agree, she is offering him a guiding light out of the mess he is in. He is the “bewildered shepherd” I think with a flock of sheep (the children) that he doesn’t know quite what to do with. Jen is offering him a solution – is it to be with her or just guidance?

    Reply
  275. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

    @Kate:
    That 60 day thing depends on which state the divorce is filed. California has a 6 month period (or at least they used to). So does AK. Not sure what “papers” they are supposedly signing … it does make a difference. I can’t think of anything legally that would require that much time to pass. Hmmm. Unless they are agreeing to not file until a certain date. Who knows! I need more info on the legalities … can’t even speculate really.

    Reply
  276. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I was told that the one that was not his was Viv, that is what this person who says they know was told, now I do not know if they are credible or not because I hear things all the time through family I do not trust, I have always felt Knox was James because he looks like him and that is how the conversation came about , we were just chatting and they said, uh, no, wrong, Knox is his son, Vic is not his daughter.

    But, the riddle implies that the -illegitimate kitty litter-illegitimate child is the one, so that is why I said maybe Shiloh. Ian said before he heard that an ex lover wanted a DNA test , not so much that Jolie did, but the lover did because he feels the child is his. At the time she got pregnant with Shiloh JLM said she was sleeping with him still and the headlines on the NE were, “Angie Scared Brad is not the Dad” or something like that, then of course JLM publicly denied it. IDK.

    This source of IAN’s should know which one is not Brads .

    Reply
  277. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    @z
    thank you for the link. I am disabled from nerve disease after a car accident. in fact, it has been 2.5 years and no answer but I show symptoms like many diseases listed. chronic fatigue,chronic pain, dystonia, disfigurement. i want to get involved with this if i can.
    it is clearly obvious that HisHighness was writing something, this is not the news. no one has been had. we are all simply giving our opinions.

    Reply
  278. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @Togi:
    yes I know, but what happened when Jen filed, and had to wait the 6 mths, it hit all the news. They can not file and keep it quiet for a year. lol They are either filing or they are not.

    Reply
  279. carrie said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @azzy:Um I think there are far easier and less messy ways to have dealt with Jen not being able to have kids if she and Brad were otherwise happy and in love. Like IVF or a surrogate. Brad’s plan was to screw Jolie and he probably didn’t plan too much father then that. Maybe he wanted to go back home, but Jen filed for divorce and Jolie got pregnant before the divorce was finalized and could be canceled. I don’t doubt that much of this has been unplanned and unwanted on Brad’s part, but he and Jen didn’t break up because of the issue of children in anyway shape or form. Those were lies spread by Jolie pure and simple.

    Reply
  280. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @Keane:
    As I long ago suspected. Still, it’s a bummer. There are “others” as well.

    Reply
  281. Peri said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    ardor and vitality … makes me think that JA makes him feel these things again

    (Remember… you never see BP smile like he did when he was with her)

    Reply
  282. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    @Fan:
    yes, that one.

    Reply
  283. ml said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    ha. the twins were born to jolie weeks apart via different fathers. a threesome between these guys. Lyme disease a government plot. you guys are great.
    -pittanistonjolie.

    Reply
  284. symbol said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    @ladybert62: Re. The comment in Russian language: His baret. душа could be referring to soul (душа) or shower (душ). I am not quite sure. Well, his basket needs a dry clean, for sure.

    Reply
  285. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    @Kate:
    New crazy idea – could Jen be adopting one of the litter?

    Reply
  286. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    “centrifugal existence”

    “Centrifugal force arises due to the property of mass known as inertia – the reluctance of a body to change either its speed or direction. A body that is at rest will stay at rest until some force makes it move, and then will continue to move at the same speed and in the same direction unless and until some force changes the way it is moving.” – does this mean Brad is inert and reluctant to make a move, its another force that is making him move, maybe Jen?

    Reply
  287. symbol said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    Sorry, baret, not basket.

    Reply
  288. carrie said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    @Togi:Lord knows he didn’t wait the last time.

    Reply
  289. Togi said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @Kate:
    Oh, ABSOLUTELY they will not be able to keep it a secret! LOL Way too many people know how to look at state court websites! And anyone can do it. That’s why I’m saying I have absolutely NO IDEA what they are signing! They very well could file under seal. Filing under seal is allowed when the information would cause harm to the individuals if it were made public (well, in an essence anyway). So …. there are options.

    Reply
  290. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    @ Togi – I know, you always have to be suspicious of the new ones, best to just wait and let them expose themselves though, no point in getting into it from word go. There is usually a hint of nastiness or bitterness that gives it away…

    Reply
  291. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    Dear KvK – is this the real you? Do you have multiple personality disorder? I am having a hard time matching these angry comments with the previous (and many) others that were thoughtful and humorous.

    Reply
  292. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    @Keane:

    Except that it is Brad and Jen together, Jolie is on the outside ( banished ), jen has the “Gotcha! look” and Brad is just staring off into the distance not looking at either one.

    Reply
  293. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    Here is a tip maybe everyone missed, Canuck asked SR
    @Ray Catone:
    Is that why all of a sudden there are stories out about how Jen is hiding in her room, never going out because she is afraid of running into Angie in NYC? Deflection?

    and Sugar Ray said in spanish-

    precisely. /precisamente-anuck said on April 25th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    Think about that.

    Reply
  294. Patty anne said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    Does anyone have a clue how to track down Holly’s personal information? Last name? Residence? I’d love to see information concerning the baby she was expecting with the exact same due date as her boss, Jolie. Strange how after the “twins” birth, Holly vanished, no photo of her child….no mention of Holly at all

    Reply
  295. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    @ml:

    There is no threesome between them

    Reply
  296. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    I was just n the middle of explaining why u shouldn’t believe this shitter when my post dissappeared- strange or what???????????????????

    Reply
  297. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    @Canuck:
    You’ve seen the ubiquitous hat….lol…maybe he’s already going bald from stress.

    Reply
  298. QuietOne said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Okay, here’s my first try. Please be nice :)

    centrifugal existence – centrifugal means to pull away from the center. Brad’s existence now has pulled away from the family unit.

    endowed and misty – endowed means to provide continued support. Brad will always provide for the kids but he’s sad (teary eyed) for not being a family unit.

    jmo

    Reply
  299. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Me too.

    Reply
  300. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Holly Golier, she lives in Savannah Georgia I believe. Is that right guys? Some small town there, someone said she was with them at the grocery store.

    Reply
  301. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    The thing is- U guys will believe ANYTHING this dickhead has 2 say!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  302. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    @QuietOne:
    LOL that is terrific, could not get that one cause we all know he is now well endowed. he he okay slap slap, not the same I know.

    Reply
  303. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    @justhelping:
    So sorry about your health problems!! It makes it very hard to have a productive life. : (

    Reply
  304. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    @Patty anne:maybe she is at her home with HER husband lookig after HER child????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    Reply
  305. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    @Canuck:
    Another good one from you – I like it.

    Reply
  306. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    sorry looking

    Reply
  307. QuietOne said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL, I know! I went there too. I had to get my mind out of the gutter.

    Reply
  308. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Okay I am updating it as we go along- this is what we have so far-let me know what we need to change out-

    Cherry trees-Cherry Blossum Festival-Brad was seen with woman on bike April 24
    …Yankee hippy
    …deserted monastery-retreat or romance
    …intended effect
    …straddling dilettante…-Brad on his motorbike
    Central Park statuette
    …owed it to posterity (maybe owes it to Jen to MIR)
    …The Baster sprinkled with Salt-spies for Angie watching Jen
    …mongrel bitch-Jen is bisexual
    …wore a monocle…
    centrifugal existence-Brad has pulled away from family unit
    …endowed and misty-he will continue to provide support for the kids but he’s sad (teary eyed) for not being a family unit.
    …gay Butler…just like JM-Gerard is gay and so is John Mayer, just friends to Jen
    …bewildered shepherd-is is the head of his family has all these children that he does not know what to do with
    …ardor and vitality-heis on fire for her and filled with vitality
    …repatriated soldier-Brad is returning to Jen
    …thumbing her nose-Jen to Angie
    ..Brangiffer-Brangie and Jen
    …Long Island lighthouse-Jen is offering him a guiding light out of the mess
    …pederast and pale
    …damp basement
    …junkhouse jealousy
    …pneumatic drills
    …too rocky for picks and shovels
    …illegitimate kitty litter-the bio kid born before they were married is not Brads, Shiloh
    …Brangiffer-Brangie and Jen
    …strange rituals
    …Clambake–Operation Clambake trying to out Xenu
    …like Elvis or Steve McQueen-gay
    …ex tells Brad to run fast…-get the hell out of Dodge
    drive at 200mph-as fast as you can
    …who are the brain police?-xenu
    …sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramba!
    “If one is not living in “integrity” it all backfires as the truth comes out. This is on all levels of being for everyone.. It is your choice.
    Freedom is just around the corner.”

    Reply
  309. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    @symbol:
    Thank you for the translation – now what was he trying to say? I dont get it.

    Reply
  310. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    I’m confused about these 2 bits:

    …mongrel bitch…wore a monocle

    and

    pederast and pale… – homosexual and ?
    damp basement… – ?
    junkhouse jealousy…Ange jealous of Brad and Jen meeting in Toronto?
    pneumatic drills…too rocky for picks and shovels… – they need pneumatic drills to get through the layers of rock between them (Brad and Jen trying to re-establish a relationship?)
    illegitimate kitty litter…Brangiffer
    …strange rituals…Clambake… – you guys think this is to do with scientology – they haven’t turned to that have they for help, God no! Oh its not about scientology’s claim to be able to “cure” people of homosexuality is it????
    like Elvis or Steve McQueen… – bisexual
    ex tells Brad to run fast…drive at 200mph…- Jen says get away from them as fast as you can
    who are the brain police?… – Frank Zappa song, check what he says about it in an interview:

    “A lot of people police their own brains. They’re like citizen soldiers, so to speak. I’ve seen people who will willingly arrest, try and punish their own brains. Now that’s really sad. That’s vigilante brain policism. It’s not even official, it’s like self-imposed. It’s hard to pin it down to one central agency when you realize that so many people are willing to do it to themselves. I mean, the people who want to become amateur brain police, their numbers grow every day – people who say to themselves, ‘I couldn’t possibly consider that’, and then spank themselves for even getting that far. So, you don’t even need to blame it on a central brain police agency. You’ve got plenty of people who willingly subject themselves to this self-mutilation.”

    It sounds to me like he is trying to deprogramme himself from homosexual impulses? What do people think? Did Elvis and Steve McQueen try this too?

    Reply
  311. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    @Fan:
    I like your interpretation of the Alice in Wonderland statute.

    Reply
  312. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    @Z:
    that made me laugh! and explains those horrible hats – what about the moustache? :-)

    Reply
  313. Patty anne said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    Oh crap , this is bad of me, but…..pneumatic drills … too rocky for picks and shovels. Jolie requires a really large and powerful “tool”, picks and shovels just don’t do it for her boney arse

    Reply
  314. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

    @Keane:
    Wow – you do have interesting ideas!

    Reply
  315. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:09 pm

    @QuietOne:
    I like them – better than anything I could dream up and seems appropriate.

    Reply
  316. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    @Patty anne:
    plus they dont easily stop as they are generated by “electric” power (as in drug powered sex) :-)

    Reply
  317. asshat said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    Ian, instead of sitting back & laughing at these poor individuals (sp?)< CAN”T USE ANY KEYS DON”T KNOW WY???_ PUT SOME ABSOLUTE RELEVANT INFO UP HERE

    Reply
  318. Patty anne said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    My thought processes sometimes amaze me…lol. Okay, here is another:
    “MONGREL BITCH”
    A Punk All Female Singing Group
    Lower East Side
    New York City
    Some song titles: You Effed Up; Busted City; and PerpenDICKuous.
    Google them for more of the lyrics

    Reply
  319. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    asshat = caea/claea part II.

    Yawn.

    Reply
  320. QuietOne said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    @Keane:
    Could the “brain police” simply refer to self-monitoring of one’s thoughts and behavior. If Brad’s been in therapy, which was mentioned in a previous thread, then maybe he’s trying to police himself. Trying to stay away from negativity and strange rituals. This would make sense as to why he’s with JA. Her positive influence on him. Just a thought. Or more like a stab in the dark.

    Reply
  321. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    @ladybert62:
    to be literal again (cant helpt it)- per my husband (who thinks I have gone cuckoo – in a good way – over this site) – a “pneumatic drill” is a tool that is powered by compressed air (”hot air?” – me thinking here not hubby) – the compressed air is powered by electricty or gasoline/diesel.

    Reply
  322. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:19 pm

    @Patty anne:

    That’s good, but I think it refers to AJ. Someone of ( self proclaimed ) mixed decent, and I don’t think bitch is a stretch.

    Reply
  323. Fan said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    @Fan:

    descent — Geeezzz

    Reply
  324. Patty anne said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:23 pm

    Brain Police; A psychiatrist treating one or both for mental disorder and prescribing policing drugs? As in take your anti-psychotic meds or ….. Just a thought

    Reply
  325. Patty anne said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    Sorry, i didn’t make that post about my interpretation of the pneumatic drill clear. I’ll forget my modesty and just say it. What if it means Angie can’t get her rocks off with a pick and shovel sized member, but requires a large pneumatic drill? Geeze, did i post that?

    Reply
  326. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    @Keane:
    Sounds to me like she is couseling Brad on him having sex with underage boys or that he was the underage boy, maybe with Thom Racina, maybe the pale means Jolie is threatening to let it come out-

    Ian posted this back in November 2008 on Steve MeQueen-

    On a film set, an actor must produce quick results – it is too expensive if he doesn’t. Certainly, young actors, at the puppet’s end of a production string, have to be able to twitch on order – exactly what one aspiring teen actor did back in the sixties. “Carl” started working as an extra on films back in 1959 at age 12. He revealed to IUC that by age 14 he had slept with more than two dozen actors, producers and directors – all male. Now, he’s finally ready to tell all.

    “I slept with some of Hollywood’s leading men,” “Carl” said from his current home in Tempe, Arizona. “Marlon Brando was the first big actor I slept with. He fell in love with me on the set of Mutiny On The Bounty. We had a two month fling. Others I’ll out in my book include Steve McQueen, Burt Lancaster and one of Hollywood’s most macho actors of all time who noone has a clue was gay.

    “I met Steve McQueen on the set of The Magnificent Seven. I was a background actor. He noticed me and told one of the AD’s he wanted to talk to me. An hour later on a break I was making out with Steve in his trailer. That night we got drunk and ended up in bed. We saw each other periodically for three more years.

    “Back then it was taboo to admit you’re gay. Even now people frown on it in Hollywood when it comes to males. I’m sure at least 70 percent of male actors today are gay and won’t admit it. They’re afraid of being blacklisted.”

    The sharpest and most cogent account of his escaped is when he recalls a threesome he had with Burt Lancaster and a Hollywood exective producer. “They got me drunk at a party one night at the producer’s house, drugged me and raped me,” “Carl” said. “They tied me up, gagged me and took turns doing many things on me that they should have been arrested for. I became their sex slave for two days straight. When it was over I wanted to call the cops but they threatened me, telling me noone would believe me and that I’d never work again. The producer gave me $500 to shut up, which is exactly what I did cause I knew I would not have had any chance going up against such powerful people. In Hollywood, there’s a ton of payola – cash talks. So many horror stories are covered up cause the authorities are paid off.”

    Reply
  327. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    @Keane:
    Or maybe she has hooked up with Zulu and they are going to release info they have on Brad and Thom Racina

    Reply
  328. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    @Patty anne:
    and that is one reason she got tired of “peewee” Brad – I know, stating the obvious again….my bad :-)

    Reply
  329. QuietOne said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @Patty anne:
    LOL, I understood this interpretation.

    Reply
  330. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @Patty anne:
    SR did say Brad is under the care of a shrink.

    Reply
  331. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    HEY ASSHAT. Put your asshat away, you are stinking this site up with your shit

    Reply
  332. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    Okay just a thought, there was a story about J Lewis laving Xenu, and then there was a pic a couple of weeks ago of Jen and J Lewis together, wonder if they are trying to help Brad, maybe Xenu has info on Brad about the time he lived with Thom Racina that 2 years and they are threatening to use it in order to get Angelina to join them

    Reply
  333. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    you guys just let asswipe talk to himself doesn’t matter

    Reply
  334. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    Posterity means descendants or future genrations. owed it to the kids?

    Reply
  335. Patty anne said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    For someone growing up in the BreadBasket of America aka Bible Belt (Oklahoma/Missouri/Kansas, etc) somone with Jolie’s sociopathic ego must have been a shock. I’m sure he’s experienced a lot bi, but i feel he was absolutely stunned to death by what he became privy to living with her. His family is devout, and whether he practices religion or not, he is still instilled with some of their values ergo, he is having a very difficult time dealing with what he now knows reguarding the woman he selected to become the mother of his children. Just imagine what Shiloh and Viv will be when 16? what about incest with Maddox, Pax or/and Knox? He must be living in ELL over what he’s done, and “Posterity = Future Generations or all generations to come”What a mess he’s made of his life, and those of his bio kids who will never be loved or accepted by Jolie as her more deserving ones who struggled to live….geeze JMO, but DaYam Bradley! You used the WRONG brain on this one mister!!

    Reply
  336. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    @Kate:
    Kate, ITA- why all this hostility, K v K? I thought we were friends! (lol) But really, it seemed like you were digging in to all this with us.

    Reply
  337. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    @Patty anne:
    That is so true Patty Anne, this great gift he bragged about giving his kids as mother, remember how wierd that sounded when he said it, all twisted coming out of his mouth, now we know why. I really feel sorry for those kids. They are going to be so screwed up. She thinks incest is okay, she may have them all sleeping together by the time they are 12. naked. jmo

    Reply
  338. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    “damp basement…junkhouse jealousy…pneumatic drills…too rocky for picks and shovels……strange rituals…Clambake…”

    Still puzzled about this bit. The “pneumatic drills” could be what is required to sort Brad’s mind out, the “picks and shovels” just wouldn’t be strong enough. Its not enough just to chip away at his issues, he needs deep penetrative mental assistance. Is “damp basement” a metaphor for his state of mind, at rock bottom? Therefore the need for the drills rather than the picks and shovels to cut through this rock. “Strange rituals” some sort of cleansing ritual meant to heal him – some sort of white witchcraft??? If clambake refers to some sort of anti-Scientology programming then could it mean that he is going through intensive therapy and some sort of ritual to rid him of his demons? Some of the dark things he has seen with AJ for exmple?

    Reply
  339. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    @ McDooks, Kate et al – I fear this may have been the first KvK may have heard of Ian’s planned books. I fear this news may not have been something they are overjoyed to hear. JMO!

    Reply
  340. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    ok – another stab from the unimaginative one here- I read sometime a long time ago (before I found you guys) that AJ liked to “sleep with Maddox and Pax” – little boys – then and now, I find this disturbing if its true. But could this mean the “pederasty and pale” she molesting them and they being frightened (pale)? As usual, now and forever more, just horrible ideas are only my horrible imagination and opinion.

    Reply
  341. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    @Keane:
    Does that mean you think KvK was a plant by someone?

    Reply
  342. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    Thom Racina authored a musical called Allison Wonderland. Does that help?

    Reply
  343. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    Okay this is what I think it is up to the part about the -pederast and pale- so to put it in story form and based on what we know from the past-

    Brad is seeing Jen again, spent time with her at the monastery and the Cherry Blossom Festival, riding on his bike, went to Central Park (they did this alot when dating), he owes it to the furture of his children though to not just bail completely , and Angeila has spies on them, at the Baster set as well. Jen is in hiding, to deflect from the time she is spending with Brad and helping him. She is bisexual, . Brad has pulled away from his family but will take care of his kids always but is very sad about not being a family unit. Both GB and JM are gay and they are just friends. The stores JM has bagged on jenin public have been for deflection as well.. Brad is bewildered about his kids, does not know what to do, he is trying to work out a visitation agreement.He feels revititalized to be with either Jen or whoever he is involved with and is on fire for that person.and is seems to be Jen because it indicates he is returning home to her, and she is thumbing her nose at Angie. Jen is the light leading the way for him to come home, giving or to get out of this mess, giving him advice.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————————
    Now the rest has to continue on from there and still tell as story-

    …pederast and pale-his relationship with a young boy he is afraid will come out
    …damp basement
    …junkhouse jealousy
    …pneumatic drills
    …too rocky for picks and shovels
    …illegitimate kitty litter-

    …Brangiffer-Brangie and Jen
    …strange rituals-
    …Clambake–Operation Clambake Scientology
    …like Elvis or Steve McQueen-gay-
    …ex tells Brad to run fast…-
    drive at 200mph-
    …who are the brain police-
    …sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramba

    Reply
  344. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 6:59 pm

    @ladybert62:
    no, that part is not about her, it is about Brad, that is man to boy. or boy to man

    Reply
  345. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    Thom Racina authored a musical called Allison Wonderland. Does that help? He has a page on BP at his website.

    Reply
  346. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    @justhelping:
    Yes it does. lol

    Reply
  347. p said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @Patty anne: . Then again if Brad’s a pedophile, that’s all kind of moot… I mean how much worse can she be?

    ped·er·ast audio (pd-rst) KEY

    NOUN:

    A man who has sexual relations, especially anal intercourse, with a boy.

    Cue me in if this is wrong SR, please.

    Reply
  348. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @justhelping:
    I think that Thom Racina, Scientology, has to be part of this. Brad lived with him for 2 years, never allowed his picture to ever be taken at his home. The guy wrote a book for him to play the lead in and Brad ignored him probably our of fear of being outed as bisexual. He went to the xenu meetings with J Lewis, and Ian told us they want Jolie in their mix. It would make sense that they have that info and would use it against him to get him into their fold and Jen is telling him to run away from them as fast as you can..doesn’t it..?

    Reply
  349. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    @asshat:

    Angie – STFU…. karma is a bitch. You shouldn’t have been messing around with a married man anyway – remember how devastated your mother was? I’m sorry, but you made your own bed. Now, take it like a woman.

    Reply
  350. annonymous said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    How deep does the rabbit hole go? they sell their souls… see the patterns

    http://pseudoccultmedia.blogspot.com/

    brain police? could be the “PR Machine”??

    Reply
  351. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    @p:
    I think it means he is upset and pale about the someone finding out he lived as a lover with Thom Racina when he first came to Hollywood. Thom was very jealous of Brads life and you can feel his bitterness in his writings. That Los Feliz home Brad owns is the same are that Brad was with him at….maybe the same house..Thom has talked about that when he did some radio shows.

    Reply
  352. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    @Keane:
    Just a thought- to expand on what you said about de-programming homosexuality- isn’t CO$ anti-homosexual?
    Could that Clam-bake thing tie in to this at all?
    Not to say any of them are delving in to it, but maybe it is just a clue as to his personal struggle/strife?
    NOT THAT I KNOW HE LIKES DUDES, Just pondering what we’ve all been speculating. {Looks around left & right}

    Reply
  353. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    Guys, I’m still struggling to catch up and get in “real time”
    I had to bypass a whole boatload of postings on the other threads…So feeling a little out of the loop!

    Reply
  354. annonymous said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    @annonymous:
    speaking of AJ.. here ya go…

    http://pseudoccultmedia.blogspot.com/2008/10/angelina-jolie-is-changeling.html

    Reply
  355. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Heh heh

    Reply
  356. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    @Kate:
    Very interesting in its own right.
    You may be on to something to question if it somehow connects to this post.

    Reply
  357. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    @Kate
    do you notice all the dog references. how they fell over the dog when BP got first decent role because he bearhugged Thom. They just laughed as they fell together.

    Reply
  358. bluiznsmilez said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    Why hasn’t Ray Catone signed his input Te Amo, SRRC like he normally does? Just finding it odd.

    Reply
  359. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    @Kate:
    Interesting. CO$ is truly diabolical if there is any reality to your theory. Did Juliette Lewis ditch Zeenuuu?
    I like her, but can’t get over the affiliation with CO$.

    Reply
  360. QuietOne said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    Here’s another thought in reference to Clambake. Aren’t clams buried under seawood to bake them. So, what needs to be buried? Pederast and pale? damp basement? Junkhouse jealousy? Just a look from another angle. But Clambake is capitalized. Is there any significance to this?

    Reply
  361. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    @ladybert62:
    An off topic but perhaps pertinent observation- you mention pale, frightened…
    I am a hobby fishkeeper, and many fish exhibit loss of coloration and turn very pale when stressed/frightened.
    Don’t know if you are on to something with the boys, but may be that IS what the pale implies: stressed/frightened.

    Reply
  362. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    @justhelping:
    yeah, and it is worse than that in his other ones where he talks about his girl cheating on him and Brad puts his head on his shoulder and cries.and another one he gets a part and her jumps up in his arms…lol..very clear message-he came to my bedroom to borrow a book but the house if full of books….etc lol

    What if this part is really all about blackmail,this second part- 2 different subjects
    Brangiffer–each time we see this it seems to start a new section
    …Long Island lighthouse-maybe this was a meeting place
    …pederast and pale-to discuss Brad with Thom or a boy and he went pale
    …damp basement-they were in a basement discussing in the LH or it happened in a basement
    …junkhouse jealousy-someone is very jealous , junkhouse what does that mean? Is this Angelina threatening
    or is this Thom McCann or someone else
    …pneumatic drills-have to dig deep to find this information?
    …too rocky for picks and shovels-no amatuers can dig it up
    …illegitimate kitty litter-becasue they have buried the way these kids were born and adopted deep

    So two things can be revealed , him being with a male lover, either when he was young and the guy was old, or now he is he old and the guy was young. either way he would turn white. lol

    Next, someone knows about the kids, they are not all his, he had not adopted them, etc..

    So two blackmail schemes.

    then the 3rd story is after the next-
    Brangiffer-and this is the one with the Operation Clambake

    Possible or Not?

    Reply
  363. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    @anonymous
    that site is interesting. I have a question? Have we seen the term Illumanti before. If so this site discusses that as term in mind control. what if AJ not only controlled the media but also BP. now he needs to be deprogrammed with help from others, JA?

    Reply
  364. stinky-inky said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    What a difference five years makes.

    2004:
    http://www.bradpittcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/0406-vanity-fair.jpg

    2009:
    http://www.brandish.tv/brad-pitt-w-magazine-february-2009-03.jpg

    Reply
  365. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    @Kate:
    But why, after all this time?
    Hasn’t it been a zillion years since ArmPitt and cornrow Lewis?
    Why now?

    Reply
  366. Keane said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    @ p – pederast doesn’t necessarily mean an underage boy , just a younger boy. So if he is 16+ (in the UK at least) it is not a crime and is pretty common I would have thought. But I think this is to do with Tom Racina and Brad, not Brad and a younger guy. The Alice in Wonderland thing seals it. Poor Brad no wonder he is a lush and a mess these days. Nightmare. Night all, catch ya tomorrow x

    Reply
  367. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    Kate you are always ablaze.

    Reply
  368. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Thank you – I was getting discouraged as I am always wrong…. appreciate the comment :_)

    Reply
  369. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    @Kate:
    Whoa- I feel utterly clueless trying to understand that whole posting. I got confused from get go with justhelping’s post, and your reply is compounding my confusion…
    Can you make that a little more remedial? I feel like I missed an entire pertinent part of the convo :(

    Reply
  370. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    @Kate:
    you are good Kate – I am speechless and idea less as usual – impressed as usual with yours!

    Reply
  371. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    @justhelping:
    Well he definitely needs that lol, but I hope they are not in that, but many say he is in one of those.

    Just a thought, at the end SR says-
    who are the brain police-
    …jointly gay people gathered.

    Does that go together, I think it was substanial amount of gay people, sounds like a meeting.

    Reply
  372. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    @justhelping:
    There was a poster here by the name Illuminati who made some hilarious and very obnoxious posts. They were all about calling us morons (or was it serfs and intellectually stunted dullards, or something to that effect) and that we are all being watched by secret black helicopters that are doing ground x-rays on us or SOMEthing like that. Quite entertaining!

    Reply
  373. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I just make stuff up and throw it out, see if it sticks or falls. lol

    Reply
  374. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    I got pissed when SRRC saie Brangie wouldn’t split until 2/02/10. I thought this was so stupid. Still do. And I knew about the book Ian was writing but not the 3 books. I think this is stupid. Now I heard it will be E books. Really stupid. Sorry.Had to vent.

    Reply
  375. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    @bluiznsmilez:
    no biggie, he does not always.

    Reply
  376. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Aww, come on now! We’re all wrong about a ton of stuff around here, so just have some fun digging in to this twisted subject :)

    Reply
  377. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    @Keane:
    I agree, it is about Racina, but in the US that would be jail time. Teachers go to jail all the time, even if the woman is 22 and they boy is 17 and 1 month shy of 18, depending on the state and if they want to push it.

    Racina though, didn’t we have a Lost boys reference…

    Reply
  378. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Which part, where do I start?

    Reply
  379. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    @Kate:
    Now you’re talkin’ BP, JA, JM, & GB?
    Just trying to keep up!

    Reply
  380. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    If Brad is so pro-gay why if he is, doesn’t he just come out.

    Reply
  381. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    @Kate:
    Well if I EVER need a detective to solve something for me, you and Keane are the ones I hire :-)

    Reply
  382. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    @Kate:
    Think maybe they were brainstorming how to quell the gay “repercussions”?
    I just can’t imagine that these people would lose their careers if it were known that they swing both ways?
    Seems like as a species we’ve come so far, and yet not so far at all.

    Reply
  383. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    You misunderstood. He said there will also be E books because one poster has arthritis and asked about that..so he said yes, it will not be just E books.

    The date, imo, is SR estimating because that is the day the Oscar noms come out. I think people are probably thinking he will hang in until he finds out if he is nominated or not. That is speculation most likely. There is no way they can set a time table because for all they know someone could release a tae f Jolie fucking A Rod next week lol and that would be that, or her sucking off Clinton. Done Over.

    Reply
  384. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    (Forgot to add) That makes me sad. We should all love who we want and be happy.

    Reply
  385. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    You are back! Feeling better? – you seem to have your old attitude somewhat back… :_)

    Reply
  386. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    I asked if it would be available on Kindle as I have arthritis in both hands and cannot hold heavy hardbacks anymore as they are too painful – not all books are available on Kindle so I would asking about the possibility. He indicated paper and ebooks – thats all.

    Reply
  387. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    @Kate:
    Sorry to be a pain! I think it had to do with Thom Racina and talk about dogs?
    Hang on a sec, I’ll find the post and link them below.
    And THANKS for helping out this dullard :P

    Reply
  388. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Yes, he is saying, John Mayer and Gerard Butler are gay or bi and they are only friends to Jen. Jen has been putting out these fake stories about hiding out as to not run into Jolie so that no one will catch on to her riding around on a motorbike with Brad. We guessed before that JM may have helped Brad via Jen by slipping into the party and getting the vid of the whore fucking everyone and maybe her brother and that is why he is also pretending to not like her, to deflect. Possibly the incest stories may come partly from that,IDK. Guess we will find out more when Ian reports on the Jen story soon.

    BBL taking a break.

    Reply
  389. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    @justhelping:
    @Kate:

    It was these two that I fell off the train of thought and got lost in the bushes.

    Reply
  390. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Well, I doubt his parents would see it that way.

    Reply
  391. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    Because he is not gay, he is bisexual. more women though than men imo at least as far as we know. Like Paul Newman and Joanne.

    Reply
  392. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    FWIW… according to Wiki, Brad’s real first name is William. Jen is of mixed Greek, Italian-Scottish descent.

    I am into numerology. Brad is a 4. Jennifer Anniston is a 2. Angelina is a 5. The 5 and 4 are completely toxic to each other in the numerology world. The 2 and 4 are natural matches. It would not surprise me if Brad and Jennifer reunited – I think that after the attraction to Angelina wore off, Brad probably realized that he had made a big mistake. He and Angelina are like oil and water. Or dynamite and fire. 4s are all about home, hearth and family. Subsequently, they will stay in a bad relationship much longer than they should for the sake of the family unit. Not surprisingly, the 5 loves fun, freedom, adventure, and on its dark side, chaos, drama, and intrigue. They can be very malicious. I believe that Angelina thrives on this. It is so sad, because her “5″ need for drama is going to really screw up her kids. At its worst, 5s can be supremely irresponsible and reckless. The 2 is a natural moderator and the sweetest number except when they feel unappreciated, and then they can turn into the “terrible twos. I believe Jennifer has always loved Brad so naturally, she would try to help him get out of a bad situation. And the two of them are cut form the same cloth so they have a natural rapport.

    As or my comments about karma, I admit it – I lost my husband to another woman but he came back. Thank God. We have a wonderful life now. It’s been a long road, but we are soul mates and I was able to forgive him and he has been able to work through the issues which caused him to cheat. However, I have a particularly hard time with “homewreckers”. I know my husband was to blame too, but I could never allow myself to hurt another woman the way this other woman hurt me. My husband’s and my relationship was complicated. But I had never done anything to hurt this other woman, yet she hurt me. I wouldn’t wish that kind of pain on my worst enemy. To let my own selfish desires hurt someone that way – God. I can’t even fathom doing that. So yes, that’s why I can’t stand Angelina Jolie and I hope that Brad and Jennifer are able to reunite – if, in fact, they could be happy and faithful and committed to each other. I know it is ridiculous, but they press a lot of my own personal buttons.

    For the record, Brad, Jen and Angie may as well live on Mars – my life is so far removed from any of theirs that they might as well be in a different dimension. I know none of them. The only insight I have into them is through the numerology. :)

    Peace everyone – don’t know how much I will comment, but it sure is interesting reading all of your comments. My best to everyone.

    Reply
  393. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    BP di dn’t move in with Thom until after he flunked out of college wouldn’t you think, moved away etc. Having to do with the brain police. Did AJ drug BP to get this info? or do some kind of voodoo? brain police can be self imposed or imposed by another. maybe JA warns him to get away so AJ cannot control his mind. Oh, and back to the first born child. doesn’t JH have a license plate with her name? how odd?

    Reply
  394. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    Oh.
    thanks ladybert and Kate for the clarification.

    Reply
  395. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks.
    I think I need a break, too. My kiddoes are making it a challenge to spend enough time here to string together cohesive thoughts today.

    Reply
  396. p said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    @Keane: . Soory Keane but I see no indication of anyone else here, too obscure… even 16 is too young for me to feel a 45 yr old’s safe w a kid… + SR hasn’t ruled it out… hmmm might explain why they keep adopting so feverishly tho huh?

    Reply
  397. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Thank you for sharing that – I find it interesting – I know nothing about numerology and see is as another system of thought for understanding the complications of humans.

    Reply
  398. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    @p:
    I lost your logic – why would it explain the feverish adopting? Because they want the young ones to molest? Sorry to be so dense – please clarify for me.

    Reply
  399. Deeca said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    @stinky-inky:

    Oh my GOD!!! He really has aged! On the 2009 picture his eyes look so haunted.

    Reply
  400. p said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    @ladybert62: . yeah/maybe… very isolated yun ‘uns and A LOT of ‘em.

    Reply
  401. Tigerlilly said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    Clambake could be meaning to give credence to Ian’s not so story about Scientology courting Angelina…Yeah, like they don’t try and court everyone….
    You know what I find interesting? It seems that Ian is going to abandon his “gossip career”, no? He is going to “not write nonfiction”/ work in other fields? Why? Because he’s over it, or because what he’s doing here is not real? If he were in cahoots with certain celebs to see how gullible the public could be about the biggest stars on the planet, wouldn’t it be interesting to expose that, then get in their good graces for….oh, I dunno…film making, broadway, even writing fiction….
    Oh, yes, his career would be over as a “jounalist”, but he never was one, only a gossip hound and an author as far as I can tell.
    I’m not saying this is fact. I’m not even saying this is what I believe; I’m just saying this is as plausible as Angie fucking a dog and/or plants and whatnot….and dare I say more so?
    All of these conspiracy theories can work both ways…
    And no, I’m not Angie….or in her “camp” just as none of the other naysayers were….
    If I’m wrong, smack me in the face with the facts. Really…Do it. I can totally take it. And will@
    I still find this an interesting experiment, and not because I know I’m right, but because I could be wrong….

    Reply
  402. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Thanks ladybert! It really is amazingly accurate. It has really helped me to help people make peace amongst each other. If we can understand that some of us simply are wired differently than others, and not necessarily trying to drive us crazy, life is a lot more peaceful and humorous. :) It’s been a Godsend to me and has helped heal a lot of hard feelings I had once due to a lack of understanding.

    Reply
  403. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Your numerology is very interesting. I don’t know anything about it, but that was cool to read.
    I think many of us who are taking an interest in this debacle have a nerve that’s been touched by things in our own lives.
    I think that is why so many women can’t stand that trifling skank Scrangie, it hits close to home.
    Thanks for giving us you numerology observation.

    Reply
  404. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    Deflection a tale of 2 couples: Bungaloona and timkitty
    One couple is accused of faking a pregnancy while the other couple is paid tens of millions for their pics yet Ian says only 2 are bio.
    Tim accused of emotional abuse of Kitty when really fangie was abusing pitty. Wow.

    Pitty takes over Timmy job Fangie takes timmy job

    when all else fails or a scapegoat is needed blame timmy &Cosmetology. interesting
    timmy=fag
    pitty=hetero
    timmy=diablo
    angie=saint
    Wow looks like timkitty took the heat off brange

    Reply
  405. HisHighness said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    @Tigerlilly:
    Definitely off base here. My work will raise eyebrows for all the right reasons. They’re all exposes about the rich and famous, not about the people whom I respect on this blog. FYI, they’re all biographies.

    Reply
  406. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 8:54 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    I justed looked up some numerology info on the internet and it seems to be as complex as astrology! (Ug, that is a compliment in case it sounded like an insult). I am a big mouth Aries so am frequently backtracking and apologizing and explaining what I meant to say since what I actually say can sound insulting and harsh!

    Reply
  407. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    @ladybert62:
    yikes – why is it all in red – did KvK do this to me ha ha :_)

    Reply
  408. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    No it’s the same Kramer i’m just on a hand-held. It’s hard to type long sentences.

    Reply
  409. ladybert62 said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    But your whole attitude seems to dramatically shift from participating in the dialogue going on to ridiculing it. Am I misunderstanding? :-)

    Reply
  410. L. said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    Why was my message deleted? I wanted answers to those questions, and while I predicted my comment would get deleted because Im not easily fooled, Im still confused about the riddles. What is the point of them?

    Reply
  411. Kramer vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    Ladybert I already explained myself in the earlier post. I don’t have to agree with you everything if I think something is stupid I’ll say it. You and Kate explained the book situation Okay-Do-kay.

    Reply
  412. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    @Ladybert62
    I am with you on Kramer vs. kramer. I noticed name changes then attitude changes. sorry kramer but just seems odd.

    Reply
  413. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    WTF is this the Spanish Inquisition?

    Reply
  414. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    I thought my timkitty theory was a good one. Everything Timkitty was accused of publicly Bungaloona was actually doing behind closed doors. Bungaloona benefited when Timmy got the axe at FairyMount Studios.The media didn’t mind questioning Curi’s paternity but protected the scam that was Fox and Nivienne. I find that interesting especially since Fangie tarred Anuston in the media. What’s wrong with that?

    Reply
  415. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    Just because I’m not naive enough to fall for Ben & Jen 2.0 doesn’t make me a lunatic. If Ben and Jen got back together it would only confirm to me what a crock of sh-t these people really are.

    Reply
  416. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Thank you so much! Here is how you figure out what your number (your life path number – what you are all about) is:

    You add all of the numbers of your birthday and then distill them into one number. For instance, Angelina Jolie’s birthday is 6/4/1975. Add 6 + 4 + 1 + 9 + 7 + 5 together and you come up with 32. 3 + 2 = 5. So she is a 5.

    Here is a brief description of the life path numbers and their characteristics:

    1 – a leader, can be critical, hard on self – inner “bully”, strives to be the best – #1, can be competitive with self or others, fiercely independent and entrepreneurial, lone wolf, prefers to do their own thing – not a follower. Can be deeply insecure because of the inner bully. If you believe in them, there is nothing they cannot accomplish. If you do not, they will rebel.

    2 – a lover, peacemaker, set about the business of love, happiest in a relationship, if not appreciated, can become the terrible twos, good business sense, the most sensitive number, compassionate. Will put him/herself into a bad situation to help someone they care about. Very sweet. 2 men have the sensitivity of a woman. 2 women love deeply and completely.

    3 – the communicator, singing, dancing, performing, journalism, writing, prone to exaggerating the truth, mood swings, expressive, happiest when being creative. Overindulgent, life of the party – beware drugs and alcohol.

    4 – logical – the “Spock” mentality, 1 + 2 must equal 3, wants to be a good provider, home and family is most important, can over think things to the point where opportunity slips out of their hands, so bluntly honest that it can offend or hurt people at times without meaning to and they can get into arguments – plays the devil’s advocate – always trying to see both sides of the coin. Not terribly social. Favorite evening would be at home curled up with hot coco and a good movie rather than going clubbing. Must learn to listen to the advice of others to avoid the hard lessons – tend to bang their heads against a wall until they learn. A number of hard lessons. They can feel like they are always swimming upstream.

    5 – fun, freedom and adventure, chaos, drama, good-time Charley. Beware of drugs and alcohol – overindulgent like the 3. On the good side, very nice, congenial, easy going, gregarious – the celebrators of life – perfect hosts and hostesses. On the bad side – world champion complainers, drug binges, malicious and unforgiving. Loves clubbing and the electricity of being social.

    6 – The nurturers. Family, family, family. Soccer moms. Little League dads. They are natural parents and should run the company. Charismatic – they light up the room with their presence. If they don’t have children, they will baby their pets. Gregarious, creative, must learn to take care of themselves before trying to take care of everyone else. They hate to be told what to do – like to be in charge and orchestrate – they like to be the “parent”. Must be careful not to over-eat. Once they don’t like you, they may never like you.

    7 – Asker of the big questions – who am I? Why am I here? Must have spirituality. They either thank God or think they are God, excellent writers, intensely private although they don’t mind asking you personal questions. They are like aliens looking at us humans thinking, “how the heck did I end up here?” Must be with nature to be at peace. Can be very critical. Can have trouble expressing the love they feel in their hearts for others due to their need for solitude, therefore, their marriages/relationships may suffer.

    8 – The business person. Ambitions, focused. It’s all about money, but not really in a bad way. Should be a CEO like the 6. Likes financial security. This need for financial security can cause them to delve into the illegal – think Martha Stewart. Like the number 4, a number of hard lessons. They can feel like they are always swimming upstream. Can be great successes and breathtaking failures, often both in the same life. Often physically beautiful. Excellent business savvy. Must guard against workaholism. They have no problem telling you what they think – often to the point of rudeness. Must, must, must keep their sense of humor because often, the 8 life path will experience much tragedy and strife.

    9 – The humanitarian. Self – sacrificing. Trying to change the world for the better. Also a leader. Always trying to lead people to do good. Can seem like a “know-it-all” without meaning to. Highest vibration of numbers. Deep family issues – feels abandoned by their family of origin or feels too responsible for them. Wants to make a difference. Are wonderful parents, but if their children go astray, they will blame themselves unmercifully. Can appear condescending. If on the bad side, they can live frivolously – for better or for worse, people will follow them. Sometimes off a cliff if the 9 is living on the bad side of his number. But if on the good side, can lead others into great enlightenment – Mother Theresa was a 9.

    There are also other numbers that affect your personalty like the soul number and the attitude number, so if your life path does not seem spot on, you should also look at your other numbers. I learned all about numerology from a lady named Glynis McCants.She has an awesome book called “Glynis has your number”. I am not shilling for her – she is just how I learned this stuff and it has changed my life for the better. If you are interested, you can look her up online or at Amazon.

    Far from being some kind of “demonic” philosophy as it ha sometimes been labeled, I have found it to be a force for unlimited good and understanding – like psychology, only more specific. It just makes sense – it’s freaky accurate. It has helped me to understand myself and those i love so much better. :) I hope it can be a source of much fun and enlightenment for you too! Goodnight everyone! :)

    Reply
  417. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    Ooopppsss – sorry – here is how the numbers relate to each other:

    1, 5, 7 – natural matches
    2, 4, 8 – natural matches
    3, 6, 9 – natural matches
    Natural matches are exactly how they sound – they are perfectly aligned and compatible with each other. they are home to each other. They belong together.

    Compatible numbers – may have a couple bumps but otherwise a good match:
    1 = 2, 3, 9
    2 = 1, 3, 6, 9
    3 = 1, 2
    4 = 6, 7
    5 = 3, 9
    6 = 2, 4, 8
    7 = 4
    8 = 6
    9 = 1, 2, 5

    Toxic numbers – problems and misunderstandings. Mac vs. Windows.

    1 = 4, 6, 8
    2 = 5, 7
    3 = 4, 7, 8
    4 = 1, 3, 5, 9
    5 = 2, 4, 6, 8
    6 = 1, 5, 7
    7 = 2, 3, 6, 8
    8 = 1, 3, 5, 7
    9 = 4, 7, 8

    Reply
  418. Cadiebelle said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    Very interesting how a certain few posters on this site ALWAYS seem to be able to decipher the riddles and mysteries. They also seem very adept at digging up obscure facts when interest here begins to wane . . .
    interesting indeed.

    Reply
  419. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 9:57 pm

    @Cadiebelle:

    Explain, please.

    Reply
  420. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    Cherry trees.. Yankee hippie…deserted monastery…intended effect.. I think this all has to do with Jennifer. She goes away to Cabo and various other places to get away from it all and connect with her inner self.
    The Baster sprinkled with Salt.. has to do with her movie that she is working on plus keeping an eye on AJ.
    endowed and misty.. AJ and Misty Cooper???? Bewildered Shepard has to do with John Mayer…naive and learning the ways of the HW crowd. Ex tells Brad to run fast.. wants him to leave AJ.

    Reply
  421. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Yeah- we want the Kramer who comes bustin’ in the door like on Jerry!
    The one who doesn’t insult us would be nice.

    Reply
  422. Unknown said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:16 pm

    you are a “journalist” !

    Reply
  423. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:16 pm

    Central Park statuette.. a lot of people assumed that the fountain in Friends was located in Central Park but it was actually a television prop at the Warner brothers studio in Los Angeles.

    Reply
  424. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    @Kramer vs. Kramer:

    Oh, forget I said anything.
    For the love of Pete, can we get an edit button!?

    Reply
  425. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Hey, if you’re still around- my numbers added up to 11. Did I do it wrong? But I see the numerology goes up to 9.
    My DOB if you can double check my math is: 02/27/1971
    2+2+7+1+9+7+1=29
    2+9=11
    I see you said something one post later about a couple of other factors.
    What number am I? Is there an 11?

    Reply
  426. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:25 pm

    All right point taken, I’ll get off the crapper.

    Reply
  427. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    @asshat:
    It wasn’t the “Dickhead” that said Lyme disease could be a govt…not plot…accident. I can’t stand when people spout off about Lyme disease when they have no idea what it feels like. Spout off meaning disbelieving it exists or that chronic Lyme exists or even that it could be a bug that the govt. accidentally let loose. needed to say that …sorry to be OT.

    Reply
  428. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    I need to know!!!
    LOL, but really!

    Reply
  429. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Yeah…ouch…not good. I guess the moustache is for that last movie…still not good at all.

    Reply
  430. anonymous said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    @justhelping:
    It is a group “behind the scenes”… all these people are their puppets for the purpose of “social engineering” in all influential areas in society. That is part of the illusion. Please have some compassion for these people it goes very deep and dissociation/bi polar and other psych conditions occur as we observe their behaviour. It is a very sad path in life and few come out unscathed or able to integrate and heal. Others it is a lonely brutal path … don’t have to get into what happens to them… Look at the statistics and what has happened to others. Really explains the drug and alcohol abuse that is rampant (among other deviant behaviours) in these influential industries.

    Reply
  431. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    No, you can be 11….my lucky number!! Double digits are good!!!! Powerful. I don’t have my book right here….wish I did.

    Reply
  432. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    @Z:
    Issokay!
    The beligerent naysaying is tiresome. People come in here to insult us like we’re talking about THEM personally.
    We’re discussing people who sold their souls to become the famous public figures that they are. They yearned and clawed their way into the public eye, but don’t you dare say anything bad about them!

    Reply
  433. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:34 pm

    @Z:
    Awright! Thanks for letting me know :) You’ve piqued my interest and I’m gonna scope out this numerology stuff. Looks like it can be enlightening even if referenced on a modest scale to help relationship dynamics.

    Reply
  434. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    You got that right, honey. Ugh. I need to ignore…and can sometimes…other times not easy. need.to.try.harder. ….lol

    Reply
  435. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:37 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    It is fun and can be right on, too!!! The cool thing about double digits is that they are powerful…so, for instance a 13 =4….but 22 stays 22. I love this stuff. : )

    Reply
  436. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    Let’s talk about Thom Rancina and Misty Cooper, I know about Rancina but fill me in on Cooper.

    Reply
  437. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Yeah, an edit button would be nice! Didn’t have this conversation. ; ) lol Hey it would be even nicer if we could delete the raving loonie-tics posts….hahaha

    Reply
  438. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    Is this the Misty in the post (poem)?

    Reply
  439. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:46 pm

    @Z:
    We all have our moments when we need to slap a proverbial ’skeeter.

    Reply
  440. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    @Z:
    Woooorrrrrd.

    Reply
  441. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    LOL…ain’t it the truth….and I do like seeing those slappings a lot of the time…because I usually want to and have held off….I just need to say McDooks…your numbers are really similar to mine…so strange…I have 7’s and 9’s and 2’s they add up to an 11 in one area…my name I think…you can do your b-day, too. I’ve forgotton a lot…use to do this all the time.
    @McDooksInCognito:

    Reply
  442. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    LOLOL…, okay, if it comes out to 11, that distills down to a 2 ( 1 + 1 = 2).

    HOWEVER – that said, if your number distills down to an 11 or 22 before you distill down to the single numbers of 2 or 4, it means you are a master number. Master numbers hold incredible power for the good of the self and humanity. McDooks, as a master number 11, your purpose is to be the best living example of love and peace. You are a true lover and mediator and a complete sweetheart. However, since your #2 is made up of 2 1s, you may feel like you are always running behind – that you could not possibly accomplish everything you need to in this life. You may get frustrated with yourself that you are not making as big a difference as you want to. My advice to you is to just relax – don’t be hard on yourself and just (OMG – hahahaha) “let your love flow like a mountain stream”… ROTFL… how corny was that? But it’s true. You will have ample time to accomplish everything you need to accomplish in this life, and you will do it beautifully.

    If the number is 22 before it is distilled to a 4, then the 4 person will have the double energy of the 2. Something I forgot to mention is that the 4 (Brad) is also a teacher and a learner. This particular 4 person will be very concerned with relationships and love. They will be very interested in making peace and will feel very deeply and be hurt easily. But just like the master number 11 , the master number 22 is an incredible force for good – teaching the world love.

    Reply
  443. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    Just looked up Misty, a movie assistant, I think, who claims Jolie seduced her…it may have been a one night stand? I just got this from one place…so who knows?

    Reply
  444. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Right! Master Number! I forgot the terminology….

    Reply
  445. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    G’night all – see you tomorrow and have a good night! xoxo

    Reply
  446. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    I love this stuff…what book do you use Janet?

    Reply
  447. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 25th, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    I dunno. I just looked up Misty Cooper . She claims to have had an affair with Jolie. While looking that up I found a quote from Fangie ” While I’ve never hidden my bisexuality, that no longer has a place in my life.” or something like that , what a crock.

    Reply
  448. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Thanks, that is very cool.
    I could definitely see much of myself in what you described- that I am forever questioning why I am not feeling “caught up” or like I’m doing enough. Especially when it comes to my kids.
    I’m definitely going to check this subject out :)

    Reply
  449. Kate said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:01 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Thank you Ian.

    Reply
  450. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    You guys, my husband is a 6 and the description of 6 IS him. He’s the only dad at our girls’ preschool where the moms come up to me and say he has “fans” on the days when he is there. We have our girls in a co-op and one day a week we “work” and he LOVES to jump right in with the kids.
    Wow.

    Reply
  451. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Night night!

    Reply
  452. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    @Interplanet Janet:
    I have a major problem with homewreckers, too. I hear ya. Funny, I looked up these 3’s sun signs recently. Apparently, with the sun signs, once again BP and JA and a natural match and BP and AJ are not. That is what I remember, anyway.

    Reply
  453. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    @Z:
    Trying to catch up, I think I’m getting jumbled around. I think I read about this gal, weren’t they all cozy on the set of some movie they did together? And since then, isn’t this gal now a lesbian?
    I wish I could find the link where I read about her.

    Reply
  454. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    @Z:
    I think it may have been more than a one night stand. Something like Scrangie was her first female lover, and it went on for a while.

    Reply
  455. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Cool!!! My husband is the same way…calling the mom’s for playdates…lol. I’ll have to do his numbers.

    Reply
  456. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Oh, OK..what I read may not be reliable….I saw a couple pics of her and a blond AJ…

    Reply
  457. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    @HisHighness:
    I really appreciate your site, Ian. And everyone on here, too (well most…lol)…I will never look at People mag (or most mags/sites) the same way. My eyes have been opened to the ridiculous lies and games these people play.

    Reply
  458. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    Yeah, now she’s too busy being “perfect” and saving the world. {eyeroll}
    I will admit, back when she was openly freaky deaky, I had no issue with her whatsoever. I thought her & BBT would be together forever, 2 loonies who might stand the test of time.
    But when her amibition out-muscled her “candid” I began to despise the obvious hypocrisy. The man-snatchin’ dint help one bit. I mean, whether ArmPitt and JA were already on the rocks, I don’t know- but I DO know that all the machinations she made against JA to make her look bad and make Scrangie look good was just evil and unnecessary. Cruelty is like a beacon to the part of me that despises it.

    Reply
  459. Interplanet Janet said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @Z:
    Hi Z – it’s called “Glynis has your number” and it is written by Glynis McCants. She has taught me everything I know. :)

    Reply
  460. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    @Z:
    Are they long lost brothers?! My husband arranged for us to go the movies this coming Tues with my 4 year old’s bestest buddy.

    Reply
  461. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    Maybe you shocked us! lol…..I actually think we are getting so wary of the loons popping in here….we are getting sensitive, perhaps?

    Reply
  462. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    @Z:
    It may have been on the set of Gone in 60 Seconds? This was several years ago if I remember any of it correctly. My brain is on overload with Brangie anymore!

    Reply
  463. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Must be long lost bro’s!! His real brothers aren’t even all that much like this….But he’s always going to the movies (or somewhere) with our son and moms & friends….I go sometimes, too. It’s fun.

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Ooo, thank you!! I have an old (ooooold) one…it would be fun to get a new one.

    Reply
  464. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    junk house jealousy… wonder if this has something to do with pawn shops? We know AJ likes to visit pawn shops.

    Reply
  465. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    I’ll check it out….yeah, it is hard to remember much!

    Reply
  466. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    Wanted to add…Jennifer likes to go Antique shopping. Could that be a junk house?

    Reply
  467. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    @cuze:
    Right! The jealousy part…I wonder what that would be…she certainly has enough money to buy the store.

    Reply
  468. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Well put!! Couldn’t agree more!!!

    Reply
  469. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:28 pm

    the pics of misty and AJ look cozy. Some boobie grabbing goin on. Scrangie looks, well, scrangie.

    Reply
  470. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:29 pm

    @cuze:
    Good query! Think she is jealous of the “spirituality” that some used/pawned stuff might possess? I don;t know if she believes in that at all or not, but just kickin’ it around. Someone who feels empty inside could easily feel jealous of something they perceive to have a quality they themself lack.

    Reply
  471. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/archive/2008/02/22/...

    A link to the interview with Misty re: romp on set of Gone in 60 Seconds.

    Cliff’s notes:
    Lots of flirting from moment they met eyes, after weeks of flirtation they “consumated” (not officially confirmed by Misty) their lust in Scrangie’s trailer. A few days later filming stopped and Misty has never seen Scrangie since.
    I think that movie came out in like 2001. Article says she was with BBT but not yet married.

    Reply
  472. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    @Kramer vs. Kramer:
    This is a great HW nursery rhyme…it’s got rhythm!

    Reply
  473. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    I like it! Cliff notes. Let’s go to the video-tape. brb.

    Reply
  474. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    @McDooksInCognito:
    For some reason the link doesn’t work…good thing you put cliff notes!

    Reply
  475. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    mongrel bitch..wore monocle..centrifugal existence…. Are we talking about Madonna here? She wore a monocle in her respect yourself video years ago. Is she the one that is thumbing her nose at Brangiffer? I know her religion is Kabbalah. The ending may have something to do with Scientology. Tom Cruise and Will Smith..pederast and pale…. yes, I know that’s a stretch.

    Reply
  476. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    @cuze:
    Madonna has come up a lot…it could be her. Did someone say Jen wore a monocle somewhere?

    Reply
  477. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:50 pm

    Does Butler play more of a role than JA’s cover up?? He did work on a Lara Croft film with AJ. Would he have more info that he passed to JA? If we assume JM got the low down, would GB be able to help nail it down?

    Reply
  478. cuze said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    @Z:
    I google Jen and monocle and didn’t find anything so I’m not sure.

    Reply
  479. McDooksInCognito said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:52 pm

    @Z:
    Dang! Sorry about that.
    Here is a text copy/paste (sorry it might be long)

    Friday – February 29, 2008

    Please wait for the page to load before clicking on the photos.
    In a recent interview, Misty Cooper, 36, has revealed for the first time, her on-set fling with actress Angelina Jolie.

    At the time, Misty Cooper was working as an assistant to a producer on the car chase movie, ‘Gone in 60 Seconds’ which also starred Nicolas Cage. Cooper first laid eyes on Angelina when she saw the actress getting out of a chauffeured car, and the attraction was instantaneous.

    Misty Cooper
    misty4.jpg

    “We Immediately felt the sexual chemistry, and I could feel that she was also giving off a vibe. She looked super-hot, and I really wanted her.” Misty said.

    Misty was well aware of Angelina’s sexual history. She knew that Angie had fallen for lesbian model Jenny Shimizu while they were working together on the set of ‘Foxfire,’ (1996) so she knew she had chance!

    One week after their first encounter, they ended up talking at craft services and Misty realized that “Angie wanted to sleep with me as much as I was so desperate to get her into bed,” adding; “You could cut the sexual tension with knife.”

    At one point Misty wondered if their flirtatious relationship would be hindered by the new man in Angie’s life at the time, actor Billy Bob Thornton. Even though he was still engaged to Laura Dern.

    Misty Cooper
    misty5.jpg

    But their lusty flirting continued on and one night at a Hollywood party thrown by one of the film’s stars, Vinnie Jones, Angie made her move. While they were all dancing, Jolie pushed her body into Misty’s backside but Misty was afraid of anyone who could be watching so she didn’t make her move. Later, Angelina told Misty that she was “a tease” and Misty answered back, “Well that makes two of us.”

    Eventually, others on set noticed the ladies’ on set antics and someone even warned Misty to stay away from Angelina because she was “trouble.” “But it was impossible, she’s just so sexy.”

    Then finally one day on set after weeks of flirting and giving strong sexual vibes, they made their move… To Jolie’s trailer!

    While Angelina was talking about her sex life, she told Misty that she had many girls but none of them were as good as Billy Bob Thornton. Misty responded with, “But you haven’t had me.” Shortly after an assistant was taking polaroid pictures of the cast and crew on set, and snapped a couple of Angelina and Misty. As you can see in the photos, there was some playful groping involved.

    Angelina Jolie & Misty Cooper
    misty2.jpg

    After that, Angelina dropped the bomb; “I want you to come to my trailer, get naked, and we’ll have more fun and more photos.” And although Misty hasn’t revealed what happened once they were inside the trailer, she did say this, “Angie has very soft lips.”

    Yowza.

    A few days after the trailer romp, the filming ended and Misty never saw Angelina again.

    When asked about Angie’s new love, Misty responded by saying “She (Angelina) can sleep with anyone she pleases, male or female, and she’s quite the seductress, so what chance does Brad have? Although he’s beautiful looking, there is no way he can keep her down. Angie has an incredible body – Brad should enjoy it while he still can.”

    Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt.
    angpitt1.jpg

    Recently the mother of four and humanitarian, Angelina Jolie, spoke openly about her sexuality, saying “I’ve never hidden my bisexuality, but there’s no longer a place for that in my life.”

    Misty disagrees with that. “She (Angelina) told me that only one man had really satisfied her, Billy Bob. Even if Brad is a fabulous lover, Angie still must be wondering what she’s missing,” adding; “It’s only a matter of time before Brad finds him cheating on him with another woman.”

    Misty Cooper is currently living with her female lover of 8 years.

    Angelina Jolie & Misty Cooper
    misty3.jpg

    Comments: 82 Tags: What The Frick?

    Reply
  480. justhelping said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:53 pm

    Did the dog “Bingo” have a secret camera placed on it? The mongrel bitch wore a spectacle. Just a guess. There was a big deal about the disagreement between AJ and the now unemployed dog.

    Reply
  481. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:58 pm

    @Kate:
    I didn’t know BP was seeing a shrink…I think that is good news. If he could get his twisted up head straightened out maybe the kids would have a chance. So do you guys think the adoption (3 weeks ago) story is false?

    Reply
  482. Z said on April 25th, 2009 at 11:59 pm

    @justhelping:
    Hmmm interesting thought here….or another dog…it seemed Bingo wouldn’t get near her.

    Reply
  483. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:03 am

    Could the pneumatic drills(jackhammer) have to do with BP tearing down and rebuilding the dreamhouse he and JA. -too rocky for picks and shovels- Is this SRRS’s way of saying the relationship can’t really be rebuilt? Can’t yourself out dig yourself out of this ditch so to speak.

    Reply
  484. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:03 am

    Clambake lyrics sung by Elvis Presley

    all right, hmmm
    Mammas little baby likes clambake, clambake
    Mammas little baby likes clambake too
    Mammas little baby likes clambake, clambake
    Mammas little baby likes clambake too

    hey listen world, you’ve got to know
    I’m cutting lose and letting go
    who needs the worry and the strife
    life can be a ball now, just following my life
    clambake, gonna have a clambake
    clambake, gonna have a clambake

    look for the brightest lights in town
    that’s where you’ll find me hangin around
    I’ve got this feeling to be free
    I pick and choose the life I want
    and that’s the life for me
    clambake, gonna have a clambake
    clambake, gonna have a clambake

    then the lyrics repeat..

    Reply
  485. McDooksInCognito said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:04 am

    @justhelping:
    In a very “incestuous” enclave such as HW, I gotta ask what would be in it for them, to “help”?
    I’m thinking BP is still the higher powered star with potential lasting power in the industry, lord knows Scrangie can’t act. I would guess it would have to benefit JM & GB in order for them to trifle in this mess, no?

    Reply
  486. McDooksInCognito said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:06 am

    @justhelping:
    At Target they have a thing in the toy department that is basically a “pet cam”….
    See the world as your dog sees it, I think is how they market it.
    You never know! Bingo could be an unwitting informant.
    I’m just teasing! About Bingo the informant – the pet cam really does exist :P

    Reply
  487. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:07 am

    @McDooksInCognito:
    Wow. Not surprising, tho….it sounds just like she seems to be – AJ, that is. imo. Thanks, McDooks.

    Reply
  488. McDooksInCognito said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:07 am

    @Z:
    Okay, this is all in fun, but ….

    I think he needs a proctologist to get his head outta where it’s been for a while now…..
    {Badump dump}

    Reply
  489. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:08 am

    pneumatic drill is a jackhammer but I don’t know what that’s about or how it applies here.

    Reply
  490. McDooksInCognito said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:09 am

    @cuze:
    Hmmmmm…
    Mabye that’s ArmPitt’s new anthem?

    Reply
  491. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:09 am

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    Oh good one regarding jackhammer.. didn’t see your post.

    Reply
  492. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:11 am

    @McDooksInCognito:
    hehehe.. sure sounds like his chant doesn’t it?

    Reply
  493. McDooksInCognito said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:11 am

    G’night, see you guys tomorrow.

    Reply
  494. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:12 am

    I just read about an underground sex club called Hot Lap Dance Club. The owner, a lawyer, just got busted by police last year. His name is Lewis (another Alice in Wonderland coincidence). This site for the club boasts of hot actresses and models who danced and more. Am I wayyyyy off here?

    Reply
  495. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:13 am

    @McDooksInCognito:
    goodnite.. headed there also.. just wanted to write down a few thoughts about the post before I went to bed. Love your doggie avatar.

    Reply
  496. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:14 am

    @justhelping:
    anything underground and sex together can not be that far off with Brangelina. lol

    Reply
  497. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:15 am

    @McDooksInCognito:
    I saw that recently….a cat had one on and is having an art show…lol. Seen in the trustworthy People magazine….haha. I believe their stories about real people (until I hear otherwise)…no more about the celebs, tho.

    Reply
  498. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:16 am

    @cuze:
    lol…so true.

    Reply
  499. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:18 am

    @Z:
    nite Z .. have a good weekend..what’s left of it.

    Reply
  500. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:19 am

    @Kramer Vs. Kramer:
    There are a lot of house references…I wonder the house on LI…since it says LI lighthouse. Although there doesn’t seem to be much symbolism with that one. They are there temporarily, right?

    Reply
  501. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:20 am

    @cuze:
    Night! you, too…I should head off, too. It’s so hot tonight…yuck. Hard to sleep.

    Reply
  502. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:21 am

    @cuze
    the lyrics make total sense. the city with bright lights=ny

    Reply
  503. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:23 am

    @z
    yes house is rented. in my opinion.

    Reply
  504. magnus said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:27 am

    Shaman sees around her neck a dog collar,
    A pentagram seared into her fleshy parts;
    Slattern will soon long for grasses of bitterness,
    For her golden life has turned to dross.

    Reply
  505. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:33 am

    Vadge has apartment in Central Park. Remember A-Rod’s visits to help “emotionally” heal her broken heart?

    Reply
  506. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:33 am

    @McDooksInCognito:
    I’m back…lol….it looks like Shizmu says the same stuff Misty does: Shizmu says that Jolie loves lesbian action and isn’t going to be satisfied with the role of mother and wife: “Angelina loves danger and dabbling in the dark side. That’s where she gets her kicks – not playing happy families with one man.” Well, it sure looks like they were right. imo.

    Reply
  507. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:37 am

    @justhelping:
    LOL…poor, poor Madge. yack. After all this news of A-Rod and AJ and whoever, while he has had surgery (?)…I just bet he was only healing her heart…..lol…actually, I’m thinking she probably never had a broken heart. ; )

    Reply
  508. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:48 am

    Okay just the 2ns half-

    ..Brangiffer-Brangie and Jen
    …Long Island lighthouse-Jen is helping Brad through this trauma, he has been made aware this is out
    …pederast and pale-Brad was seduced by Thom Racina when he was first starting out in HW, he was an
    older man, Brad was about 22 , and now he is scared. turned pale.

    …damp basement
    …junkhouse jealousy

    Big Deception
    …pneumatic drills-It is used to drill rock and break up pavement (works like a hammer and chisel)will need
    this drill, because it is …too rocky for picks and shovels-it will take something more than this to get to the bottom of this, …illegitimate kitty litter-there are bios that are not his and he did not adopt all, and pictures sold and money accepted and the public deceived.

    …Brangiffer-Brangie and Jen
    …strange rituals-Brad went through strange rituals at Xenu when he dated J. Lewis, everything was taped, confessed it all , that he had bisexual feelings and an affair with Thom Racina

    …Clambake–Operation Clambake -Brad is now fighting against Xenu to keep it quiet …like Elvis or Steve McQueen-gay- they are going to out him for being with young boys or being with Racina

    The Elvis Connection-

    According to former Elvis crony Lamar Fike, Elvis stopped dating “Mod Squad” star Peggy Lipton because she kept trying to get him to join the church. “One day, in L.A., we got in the limousine and went down to the Scientology center on Sunset, and Elvis went in and talked to them,” Fike said in “Elvis Aaron Presley: Revelations from the Memphis Mafia,” one of several sources who say that Presley didn’t like Scientology. “We waited in the car, but apparently they started doing all these charts and crap for him. Elvis came out and said, ‘F – - – those people! There’s no way I’ll ever get involved with that son-of-a-bitchin’ group. All they want is my money.’ . . . He stayed away from Scientology like it was a cobra. He’d s – - t a brick to see how far Lisa Marie’s gotten into it.” http://xenu.net/clam_faq.html

    So like Elvis, Brad Pitt also said FUCK YOU XENU and that has pissed them off for years and years ( I have always heard this too)

    The Steve McQueen Connection-I posted above his relations with young boys,Brad was with Thom Raciina
    in addition to that-he rides motor bikes, is one of his idols and-’

    London, Jan 16 (IANS) Hollywood actor Brad Pitt is the front runner to play iconic American actor Steve McQueen in a biopic planned by two top movie producers.

    Michael Cerenzie and Christine Peters recently acquired the rights to the biography “Steve McQueen: Portrait of an American Rebel” by Marshall Terrill and plan to adopt it into a film later this year, reports thesun.co.uk.

    “There are a number of actors being linked to the role of Steve McQueen, but Brad is the front
    runner. He not only has the right look and acting talent, but he shares Steve’s love for fast cars and motorcycles,” a source said.

    The film will follow the on-screen career of Steve, which started with an unaccredited role in “Somebody Up There Likes Me” and later included hits like “The Magnificent Seven”, “The Great Escape”, “The Sand Pebbles” and “Bullitt”.
    This was reported by many, but there are several actors up. Brad was dubbed the new Steve McQueen at one point
    ————————————————————————————————————————————————-
    …ex tells Brad to run fast…-get away from them , do not join or be blackmailed etc
    drive at 200mph-as fast as you can
    …who are the brain police-Scientology brainwashing
    … substantial..jointly gay people gathered –meeting perhaps?

    Reply
  509. benjaminbutton14 said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:55 am

    Good morning everyone Sundy night here.

    Reply
  510. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:08 am

    @Keane:
    Darn it Keane! That’s what I was gonna say! People, it’s SATURDAY!!!! I have a life (at least I HAD one before I got involved with this place!) Lol. Now it’s night-time AK time and everyone is probably gone. I haven’t even read the rest of the posts yet. I got to this one and I thought … SHOOT!

    Precisely what struck my mind as well, Keane. That is exactly the way it sounded to me, too. Of course I’ll probably read on now and find that everyone else had the same idea. :-) Okay … on I read. If you guys see a bunch of my responses, just IGNORE THEM … Harr haarrrr.

    Reply
  511. p said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:13 am

    @Z: . A shrink yea. Supposedly moe bambinos….anythings possible w those 2 jackasses… but I think a trip to Northern Jersey, and a swift kick in the teeth, 2 broken arms and legs might be a more effective fix, given the shape of things. That way they can’t talk, walk or hurt anybody. Someone told me something a long time ago, the only thing certain types — especially thems who claim special entitlement — are afraid of is being hurt. Since then I’ve seen that many times.

    Reply
  512. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:13 am

    @Kate:
    Good guess with Thom and Brad. Sorry if it was mentioned before….whoa, I did not know about the Xenu stuff and Brad’s confessions. That is just wrong, imo. Like brainwashing.

    Reply
  513. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:19 am

    @p:
    Here we all are up late…well it’s earlier for Togi. And I need to go to sleep…but I always say that. Yeah, they would probably fear getting hurt…esp. AJ because she still has her looks. Could get messed up!!
    @Togi:
    Yeah, this place is addicting! I’m always checking in….btw, there was a harsh reaction to the book news. This is true.

    Reply
  514. p said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:39 am

    @Z: . Ever wonder why they want all those young kids… this post took me to darker corners.

    Picture it… OWW#$%^@!WTF$#%^GRMPH&%#@$%FLURK%#@!!!! …a rapid-fire expulsion of veneers and blood …. where metal joints are dispensed like candy unless your name is on the list.

    Reply
  515. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:13 am

    junkhouse jealousy could also be referring to AJ being jealous of Natalie Portman. Portman is supposed to do that movie with Pitt called…Important Artifacts and Personal Property From the Collection of Lenore Doolan and Harold Morris, Including Books, Street Fashion, and Jewelry. Movie based on estate auction catalogues.

    Ok.. now i’m going to back to bed.

    Reply
  516. Alif said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:20 am

    For what it’s worth, BP was quoted in several places as wanting to play Steve McQueen on film.
    My first reaction to that was thinking Steve McQueen must be “rolling in his grave”!

    Clambake in capital letters must mean the Elvis movie. It’s difficult to see one of my fave singers in the acting arena; mainly because the songs are nothing to sing about. So I have no clue, there!

    Reply
  517. p said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:24 am

    “Junk” referring to smack, no?

    Reply
  518. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:25 am

    The Judiciary Report had an article last Sept and said “bisexual Brad Pitt donates 100 K to support Prop 8 ”

    I thought it was kind of interesting they wrote the article as though him being bisexual was common knowledge.He has long been rumored to be and many sites say that and note there is no proof, but that was the first time I saw it that blatant.

    In a interview he did for AOJJ the reporter asked him a question and started it as,
    “As a straight man” and Brad replied “I’m not a straight man” and then he chuckled.

    Reply
  519. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:39 am

    Okay … from what you’re saying, Kate, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that the BP being “bi” is not something that could be held over his head with any effectiveness. In order for him to “pale” it would have to be something more. So I’m going to just let his “bi”-ness drop at this point. It’s really nothing as far as Hollyweird is concerned.

    Sorry, I’ve been off the site most of the day and have just finished reading EVERYTHING so no one needs to repeat anything! Now I’m ready to get down to my nightly business … trying to figure out what SR is saying. This one was a bit harder, for me at least.

    Reply
  520. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:44 am

    …damp basement — much worse than being “in the closet” A damp basement is cold, dark, wet. Depressing, etc.
    …junkhouse jealousy — perhaps someone (not AJ, even) is upset that BP is “escaping” their clutches. Drug suppliers maybe? Wondering out loud.

    Reply
  521. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:44 am

    @Kate:
    @Keane:
    Any possibility that the “pederast and pale” simply means Brad (bi, and HH has said that gets classed as gay here) and pale (blonde Jen, as opposed to brunette AJ)?

    I think that the junkhouse jealousy refers to AJ being not just jealous, but viciously cruelly jealous as in “meaner than a junkyard dog”.

    As an aside that I’m going to throw out just because it’s a small coincidence (probably only in my brain, lol), Jim Croce sang “Bad Bad Leroy Brown” in which he used that phrase. Frank Zappa sang a song called “Bobby Brown” which basically talks about a golden boy who ends up homosexual and into S&M as a submissive after sleeping with a dyke (his words not mine). Probably means nothing but the Zappa reference and the Junkyard reference kind of struck me.

    Reply
  522. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:50 am

    @Canuck:
    Well, if “junk” is “smack” … which I don’t know … is that crack, which is what? coke? I’m not too terribly familiar with drug terminology. :-| I know a crackhouse is a place where people go to do BUTT LOADS of crack. So in my mind, it follows that a junkhouse is a place where people to got do butt loads of “junk.” Perhaps the folks who run that junkhouse are freaking cuz they’re afraid BP is going to blow it for them. IDK, just guessing.

    Reply
  523. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:04 am

    mongrel bitch and bewildered shepherd both could be referring to Jennifer’s dog, Dolly. I think I had read somewhere that Dolly was a mixed shepherd.

    Reply
  524. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:04 am

    @Togi:
    Or as someone guessed a while back, maybe it’s a reference to antiques. It think it was Kate or Keane who mentioned in another thread that BP came back from France with a rocking chair and a ring. Maybe those were for JA and not AJ. Rocking chairs are particularly useful for getting babies to sleep (and is a comfortable chair as JA mentioned that she could now have couches that she could actually sit on after BP left), and a ring is pretty self-explanatory.

    Reply
  525. cuze said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:15 am

    wore monocle..could be referring to a jewelers monocle and JM could stand for Jennifer Meyer. Not sure how either of them would fit into the story though.

    Reply
  526. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    @Canuck:
    Where would “jealousy” fit in? AJ was jealous of him bringing that back for JA?

    Reply
  527. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:25 am

    @cuze:
    What was going through my mind was “mongrel bitch” — wore monocle..

    The mongrel bitch would be AJ, wouldn’t it? All the rumors about her and dogs. .. she wore a monocle (watching things closely, through the her spies, etc. Speculation, of course.

    Reply
  528. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:25 am

    @Canuck:
    ok I think this is it, the song Bobby Brown, what clue are u connecting that too, it fits brange perfect, and SR before said Brad was asking himself if he was the new yestergay, sounds like he is confused.

    Reply
  529. p said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:28 am

    junkhouse (old school – shooting gallery) – for smack, sometimes coke / speedball – potent combo of coke and H (into vein) / crack cocaine – rock -smokable cocaine / methamphetamine – stimulant (often smoked)

    Reply
  530. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:31 am

    @p:
    LOL … THANKS! Baahaa haaa. I’m such a goody-two-shoes! :-0

    Reply
  531. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:34 am

    @cuze:
    They actually call that a jeweller’s loupe, not monocle.
    @Togi:
    Yes, jealous of JA getting BP back. Can’t see AJ liking that much, even if she and BP are quits.
    @Kate:
    I really don’t know which if any clues it would fit into, it was a random connection that my brain made. But yes, it fits BP perfectly.

    Reply
  532. p said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:40 am

    How would getting JA a rocking chair for getting babies to sleep and a ring be a good thing… he’s knocking up women left and right and as Ian said he’s not that into her?

    Reply
  533. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:41 am

    Earlier Krprivacy invasion and police control, Kramer & Kramer said we should look at Frank Zappas song Who are the Brain Police. I looked that up and it is about privacy control and police invasion, but it debuted in tne album, Freak Out. That lead song was about taking drugs that caused one to freak out, be paranoid, hallucianations. So, how should we apply this at the end?

    Thanks K&K

    Reply
  534. moo said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:46 am

    @Canuck:
    JA sung Bad Bad Leroy Brown in a Friends episode (when Phoebe tries to teach Joey the Guitar)

    Reply
  535. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:48 am

    @p:
    lol you are funny so true, that story was from Star anyway he he

    Reply
  536. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:51 am

    Brangiffer…strange rituals…Clambake…like Elvis or Steve McQueen…ex tells Brad to run fast…drive at 200mph…who are the brain police?…sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramb

    Good grief, Kate. Looks like this guy has a lot to be paranoid about … BP doesn’t know who is following him. The paps, drug people, the police, AJ, the feds … It must suck to be him right now.

    Reply
  537. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:54 am

    @Togi:
    Guess I should add to that list the Xenu’s …

    Reply
  538. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:01 am

    K@p:
    I think this is correct. SEX is just saying junkie jolie they gets her drugs from harlem and not upper east side is a Nast jealous bitch like the dog in Leroy Brown

    So what is the damp basement?

    Reply
  539. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:03 am

    l@Kate:
    LOL. That should say SR not sex. I watching tv and drifting off LOL

    Reply
  540. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:13 am

    @Kate:
    Kate, you’re loosing it, hon! Lol. I’ll get back with you in a sec on the damp basement.

    Reply
  541. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:19 am

    Just an idea here. A damp basement is BAD NEWS! It brings all kinds of bad crap into your house. Mold, mildew, rot. It can damage tools, furnishings, basically make your home unusable. Even threaten your health … with the spores from all the mold, etc. So … if your basement is damp, it can destroy your entire house.

    Reply
  542. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:43 am

    @Togi:
    That’s a good thought. Unhealthy or not solid foundations

    Reply
  543. Togi said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:00 am

    @Canuck:
    Geeze Canuck … it’s almost 2:00 a.m. AK time. I’ve gotta get my music together for worship tomorrow a.m. (oooops … guess it IS tomorrow a.m.!!!!! :-| It’s gotta be even later for you (or earlier). All these different time zones throw me off. By the time I read Ian’s post Monday a.m., it will be late afternoon for everyone else … and OLD NEWS by then! Sigh. Hopefully Kate went to bed already. She was almost asleep at the computer! LOL. Signing off … chat with ya later.

    Reply
  544. p said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:06 am

    Basement might be where a deviant sex act w a youth took place. // Clambake might just be that… when the heat is on, clams open up and whatever’s inside is exposed. // illegitimate kitty litter, could be a litter of bastard humans, OR could be something funny being transported in kitty litter — maybe across state lines. Fuck could mean anything. // mongrel bitch could mean either of ‘em depending how you see them. Unless they got a mongrel to wear a wire (a monocle), to that orgy after Bingo (a retriever) failed in his mission. // NOW WHAT’S THIS? — substantive…jointly gay people gathered (the 3 of them? More? The gay confused butler too?)

    Don’t see why JA would have to sneak around that much, AJ’s got her own steamy interests. Just regular discretion.

    Reply
  545. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:17 am

    @Togi:
    It’s late morning here, I’ll just wait around for Keane to show up, LOL

    Reply
  546. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:19 am

    Haven’t posted in a while, been very busy but I have been following somewhat (you guys are good) although didn’t get thru the whole SR Infidels post yet. Also looked more into the whole money/foundation/tax return stuff when I had a chance and more on that later.

    First Section:
    Cherry trees…Yankee hippy…deserted monastery…intended effect…straddling dilettante…Central Park statuette…owed it to posterity…The Baster sprinkled with Salt

    Brad and Jen have been spending time together at various places around NY
    Brad was seen on a bike with a woman at Brooklyn Botanical Gardens
    Yankee hippy – the new Yankee stadium just opened, maybe they went there during off hours to see it. Or maybe Jen is dressed very casual (hippie like) with a Yankee cap to throw off folks and paparazzi
    Deserted monastery – someone mentioned the Cloisters – it’s not in Wash Park, it’s in Fort Tryon park at the northern tip of Manhattan. The Cloisters is a part of the Met Museum of the Arts and is a very beautiful and peaceful. Not very crowded so very easy to walk around here and in the surrounding park and not even bump into people. This would be a great place for them to go to get a few hours away. Brad straddling Jen the dilettante would be easy here.
    Perhaps they met up at the A in W statue in Central Park. This is also very near the main Met Museum.
    Jen knows all this area very well. Would be good for losing the trail of paparazzi since she could easily hop out of a car on one of the roads, climb over a few hills and meet up with Brad who got there on his bike. More difficult for paps on bikes to follow her as she goes off the areas with road access. Jen would know this area like the back of her hand since she grew up on the west side of the park and went to school on the east side of the park
    (don’t particularly want to see these two get back together however if they are able to do this and stay out of sight, I love the brilliant simplicity. Of course, it’s also possible they are paying off paps big money for any pics that have been got)
    Owed it to posterity – ?owes it to his kids to get back with the stable, peaceful JA
    The Baster sprinkled with Salt – he’s seeing more of JA now and very little of AJ

    Second section:
    mongrel bitch…wore a monocle…centrifugal existence…endowed and misty…gay Butler…just like JM…bewildered shepherd…ardor and vitality…repatriated soldier…thumbing her nose..Brangiffer
    First thought – JA is pulling him away from the bitch AJ and BP is sad for the breakup of the family and still not sure exactly what to do here with regards to custody. He is returning to JA and she is building him up again and she is thumbing her nose at AJ.

    Third Section:
    Long Island lighthouse…pederast and pale…damp basement…junkhouse jealousy…pneumatic drills…too rocky for picks and shovels…illegitimate kitty litter…Brangiffer…strange rituals…Clambake…like Elvis or Steve McQueen…ex tells Brad to run fast…drive at 200mph…who are the brain police?…sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramba!
    Don’t have enough thought on this yet but my first impression was BP and JA were also spending time together on Long Island maybe at the house to sort out what to do with the whole mess (drills, too rocky for picks and shovels) (kid(s) not his, kids not adopted) he allowed to happen and AJ is jealous. The clambake struck me as a family bbq (clambakes on Long Island) with Jen and possibly his parents (side note: JJ pics on Sat of BP at Dunkin Donuts with the boys said his parents were with them but not photographed. So also possible they are babysitting along with the nannies while BP goes out with JA)
    Second thought on this section. Clambake, the movie with Elvis, I think he switched identities to get away. Made me think of McQueen in the Great Escape when he rides the motorcycle up and down those hills trying to get away.
    (Side note on this – For his 40th birthday, Aniston gave Brad Pitt a silk-screened-on-canvas image of Steve McQueen’s 1972 mug shot. McQueen is Pitt’s all-time idol. Also, I know someone mentioned AJ present to Pitt of the present of visit to FLWright arch. Some years before, I remember something about Jen gave him a present having to do with arch, maybe something to do with Frank Gehry, a surprise dinner or tour or something, can’t recall exactly).
    Third thought – didn’t think of the Clambase – Sci link however with everyone bringing it up it makes some sense. However my thought is Sci is going after BP (not just AJ, they’ll go after anyone in a crisis) and the ex telling Brad to run is JLewis. Jen talked to JL on the Baster set to get the low down of exactly what went on 20-odd years ago.
    I always had the impression from things I read in the past that he went to a few meetings with her and read a book or two but didn’t get in to deep (enough for them to get info from him directly). However, maybe the info they have on him is through JL.
    I really don’t think anyone is holding the Thom Racina stuff over his head after all these years. Although it’s been out there it never really went mainstream cause there wasn’t really any proof.

    Reply
  547. Fan said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:23 am

    Found this. They seem to be the only Central Park statuettes

    http://www.centralpark2000.com/database/snow_babies.html

    Sitting on pillars at the entrance to Central Park’s
    Rumsey Playfield, are two small statues
    called Snow Babies. Separated by the
    gateway door, these stone figures of
    two young children in winter attire and
    sitting on sleds look to each other.
    What is a Snow Baby? One theory dates
    back to 1893 when polar explorer
    Admiral Robert Peary was living in
    Greenland. The birth of his newborn
    daughter Marie was called
    Ah-poo-Mic-kaninny, meaning “snowbaby”
    by the Eskimos, due to her snow-white
    skin.
    The second theory traces Snow Babies to
    late 19th century Germany when
    “sugar dolls” were a favorite
    confectionery decoration.

    Reply
  548. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:17 am

    The cryptic stuff is meaningless, just fill in for no news to report to keep everyone coming here.

    What is important is this:

    *** Breaking: *****

    Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt plan attack on former bodyguard over book talk
    Sunday, April 26th 2009, 4:00 AM

    What follows below has some substance: Looks like they are trying to discredit this guy; one of the teams is lying:

    Burly bodyguard Mickey Brett has tangled with some tough customers, but none so tough as his former clients Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    Once they entrusted their lives, and those of their children, to Brett. But now that they’ve learned he’s been thinking about revealing their intimacies in a book, the star couple has come down on him with the fury of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith.”

    Pitt and Jolie, who played married assassins in that movie, have recruited some of the most fearsome libel attorneys in the U.S. and the U.K. to
    make sure Brett’s lips stay zipped.

    Recently we obtained a proposal for a memoir and a TV show, both offering Brett’s first-person account of his years guarding the likes of Sandra Bullock,
    Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Sly Stallone and Richard Gere.

    The main focus of the pitches, though, was Brangelina. Suffice it to say that Brett had fond memories of Jolie, whom he had been protecting since 2001, and less fond recollections of Pitt.

    Seeking comment from them, we received a bracing phone call from Marty Singer, the couple’s American litigator.

    Singer alleged that Brett wasn’t a reliable source. In fact, he was a “pathological liar.” He said Brett’s lies to U.S. Immigration officials here had led to his being barred from entering this country. Singer said that only recently did Pitt and Jolie discover that Brett, who’d claimed he was a British SAS commando, never even served in the military.

    Singer noted that in 1993 Brett was questioned in the murder of British tycoon Donald Urquhart, though he was later released. In 2006, Brett was arrested for assaulting a restaurant owner in Namibia. The same year, in India, he was accused of choking a photographer and arrested for roughing up and making racial insults against some parents who were trying to pick
    up their kids.

    All told, Singer said, Brett had been convicted 11 times of various crimes.
    Pitt and Jolie had repeatedly come to Brett’s defense. But they apparently came to have doubts about his style of problem-solving.

    As for his book and TV proposals, Singer said Brett was bound by a confidentiality agreement. According to Singer, Brett has now stated that he’d never signed off on the pitches and that many of the yarns attributed to him were fabricated by his ghost writer.

    Brett’s attorneys told us: “Our client disputes what has apparently been said by Mr. Singer, but is not in a position to comment further at this stage.”

    Brett’s ghost writer, Robin McGibbon, insists that he did not embellish the bodyguard’s stories.

    “Mickey was definitely going to consider a book or TV deal if the offer was good enough,” says McGibbon. But at this point, he said, “there’s not going to be any book.”

    http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/04/26/2009-04-26_angelina_jolie_brad_pitt_plan_attack_on_former_bodyguard_over_book.html

    Reply
  549. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:20 am

    The cryptic headline stuff is meaningless, just fill in for no news to report to keep everyone coming here.

    What is important is this: What follows below has some substance: Looks like team Jolie-Pitt are trying to discredit this guy; one of the teams is lying:

    *** Breaking: *****

    Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt plan attack on former bodyguard over book talk
    Sunday, April 26th 2009, 4:00 AM

    Burly bodyguard Mickey Brett has tangled with some tough customers, but none so tough as his former clients Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    Once they entrusted their lives, and those of their children, to Brett. But now that they’ve learned he’s been thinking about revealing their intimacies in a book, the star couple has come down on him with the fury of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith.”

    Pitt and Jolie, who played married assassins in that movie, have recruited some of the most fearsome libel attorneys in the U.S. and the U.K. to
    make sure Brett’s lips stay zipped.

    Recently we obtained a proposal for a memoir and a TV show, both offering Brett’s first-person account of his years guarding the likes of Sandra Bullock,
    Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Sly Stallone and Richard Gere.

    The main focus of the pitches, though, was Brangelina. Suffice it to say that Brett had fond memories of Jolie, whom he had been protecting since 2001, and less fond recollections of Pitt.

    Seeking comment from them, we received a bracing phone call from Marty Singer, the couple’s American litigator.

    Singer alleged that Brett wasn’t a reliable source. In fact, he was a “pathological liar.” He said Brett’s lies to U.S. Immigration officials here had led to his being barred from entering this country. Singer said that only recently did Pitt and Jolie discover that Brett, who’d claimed he was a British SAS commando, never even served in the military.

    Singer noted that in 1993 Brett was questioned in the murder of British tycoon Donald Urquhart, though he was later released. In 2006, Brett was arrested for assaulting a restaurant owner in Namibia. The same year, in India, he was accused of choking a photographer and arrested for roughing up and making racial insults against some parents who were trying to pick
    up their kids.

    All told, Singer said, Brett had been convicted 11 times of various crimes.
    Pitt and Jolie had repeatedly come to Brett’s defense. But they apparently came to have doubts about his style of problem-solving.

    As for his book and TV proposals, Singer said Brett was bound by a confidentiality agreement. According to Singer, Brett has now stated that he’d never signed off on the pitches and that many of the yarns attributed to him were fabricated by his ghost writer.

    Brett’s attorneys told us: “Our client disputes what has apparently been said by Mr. Singer, but is not in a position to comment further at this stage.”

    Brett’s ghost writer, Robin McGibbon, insists that he did not embellish the bodyguard’s stories.

    “Mickey was definitely going to consider a book or TV deal if the offer was good enough,” says McGibbon. But at this point, he said, “there’s not going to be any book.”

    http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/04/26/2009-04-26_angelina_jolie_brad_pitt_plan_attack_on_former_bodyguard_over_book.html

    Reply
  550. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:37 am

    A Mickey Brett Angelina Jolie book?

    Mickey Brett, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s former security guard, has a book on Jennifer Aniston’s marriage to Brad Pitt and the introduction of Angelina Jolie, says reports.

    Will the Brett book ever get released?

    Reportedly In Touch Weekly magazine is claiming, “He (Brett) knows everything about Angelina. It’s going to be one of the most explosive books ever written.” The source tells the magazine Brett never signed a confidentiality agreement

    “It (book) will include all the sordid details of how they (Pitt and Jolie) got together while Brad was still married to Jennifer Aniston.”

    Reports claim Jolie is seeking to block the publication. No official statement by Jolie to the report.

    http://news.lalate.com/2009/01/23/mickey-brett/

    Brett must have spoken out about Jolie: If he had any integrity, he most likely would comment:

    Mickey Brett (above left), who is a former bodyguard for Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, is writing a tell all book about the couple. It appear Mickey can write the book legally, because he didn’t sign a confidentiality agreement. The book is said to contain a lot of personal information, including details about the couple’s sex life, and other information that Pitt and Jolie don’t want him talking about. A source says:

    “Mickey knows everything about Angelina. It’s going to be one of the most explosive books ever written. It will include all the sordid details of how they (Pitt and Jolie) got together while Brad was still married to Jennifer Aniston.”

    Mickey was fired as the couple’s head of security in 2008. Can’t wait to see how Pitt, Jolie, and Aniston say about the book when it comes out.

    http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/mickey-brett-writing-angelina-jolie-tell-all-book/

    Angelina former bodyguard plans tell all book
    EmailWritten by whyfame on Jan-24-09 6:10pm
    From: http://www.hotfeeder.com

    Contact Music reports today that Angelina Jolies former bodyguard, Mickey Brett, is planning to pen a tell all book which he is willing to talk about everything, including Brads alledged affair with Ange while he was still married to Jennifer Aniston.

    Source claims that Ange is seeking legal advice to block Mickey from exposing intimate details of her courtship and sex life with Pitt.

    An insider tells In Touch Weekly: He (Brett) knows everything about Angelina. Its going to be one of the most explosive books ever written. It (book) will include all the sordid details of how they (Pitt and Jolie) got together while Brad was still married to Jennifer Aniston.

    Brett, who took care of the couples security detail when they went into hiding in Namibia before the birth of Shiloh in 2006.

    He was later fired by Brad in 2008.

    Seems like he is still bitter and wants revenge.

    And Brett might be in the clear when it comes to revealing all about Brangelina, since sources claim he never signed a confidentiality agreement.

    Wonder what Aniston thinks of all this?

    http://www.zimbio.com/Mickey+Brett/articles/7/Angelina+former+bodyguard+plans+tell+book

    Angelina Jolie’s former bodyguard, Mickey Brett, is reportedly about to pen a “tell-all” about the most famous thespian couple in the world: Brangelina. According to In Touch Weekly, Brett plans to divulge plenty of sordid details about Ange’s relationship with Brad Pitt, including intimations that Angelina has had assignations with other people–both male and female–since the start of their relationship.

    From In Touch, print edition, February 2:
    Mickey will reveal that during his employment with the Jolie-Pitts, Angie became too close for comfort with one man – as well as a famous female pop star. Though it is unclear what went on behind closed doors, “Mickey set up at least 20 secret meetings for Angie with this woman at hotels when Brad was working,” the source says. “Angelina would gloss over where she was to Brad, and Mickey would cover it up.” Brett has a long history with Jolie. He began protecting her at events in the early ’00s, and was in charge of the Jolie-Pitts’ security detail when they fled to Namibia during Angelina’s first pregnancy. In 2008, he was fired for unknown reasons.

    Angelina is reportedly in talks with lawyers to squash Brett’s book (big surprise). If reports are correct, she may have some difficulty: In Touch’s sources say Brett never signed a confidentiality agreement, which is a huge, surprising mistake on Jolie’s part. Celebrities should have learned long ago to protect themselves from this sort of extortion preemptively.

    http://www.zimbio.com/Mickey+Brett/articles/2/Brangelina+Ex+Bodyguard+Write+Book

    Why haven’t they fired this creep? They’re probably afraid that he knows too much personal information about them and will go to the press. There was also a story that Brad was jealous of Mickey Brett’s fatherly protecting influence over Angelina, and since he’s worked for her for over five years there is undoubtedly a bond there.

    http://www.celebitchy.com/1866/angelina_and_brads_bodyguard_chokes_a_photographer_includes_video/

    Things sure went downhill since Pitt teamed up with Jolie. Gone is the innocence, the boyish look he had with Aniston, he looks tired, worn, almost hardened from all of his ordeals. It can’t be easy, now not with someone about to write a telll all.

    This bodyguard had a bad rep, why did it take so long for them to fire him???

    On Saturday, one of Pitt’s and Jolie’s bodyguards caught a British photographer trying to take their photo, grabbing the man by his neck and verbally abusing him.

    Video of the incident was broadcast on India’s CNN-IBN news channel, and the Hindustan Times newspaper identified the photographer as Sam Relph of Barcroft Media.

    The newspaper reported that the security guard had shouted at photographers to stop shooting the couple and moved for Relph when the photographer refused to put down his camera.

    “He said if I took his pictures he would kill me,” the Times quoted Relph as saying. “I couldn’t breathe. He had his fingers on my windpipe and he knew what he was doing.”

    Two Indian journalists also complained that they, too, had been threatened by the same security guard, who was not identified in the report.

    Why haven’t they fired this creep? They’re probably afraid that he knows too much personal information about them and will go to the press. There was also a story that Brad was jealous of Mickey Brett’s fatherly protecting influence over Angelina, and since he’s worked for her for over five years there is undoubtedly a bond there.

    http://www.celebitchy.com/1866/angelina_and_brads_bodyguard_chokes_a_photographer_includes_video/

    Reply
  551. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:41 am

    *** Breaking: *****

    Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt plan attack on former bodyguard over book talk
    Sunday, April 26th 2009, 4:00 AM

    Burly bodyguard Mickey Brett has tangled with some tough customers, but none so tough as his former clients Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    Once they entrusted their lives, and those of their children, to Brett. But now that they’ve learned he’s been thinking about revealing their intimacies in a book, the star couple has come down on him with the fury of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith.”

    Pitt and Jolie, who played married assassins in that movie, have recruited some of the most fearsome libel attorneys in the U.S. and the U.K. to
    make sure Brett’s lips stay zipped.

    Recently we obtained a proposal for a memoir and a TV show, both offering Brett’s first-person account of his years guarding the likes of Sandra Bullock,
    Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Sly Stallone and Richard Gere.

    The main focus of the pitches, though, was Brangelina. Suffice it to say that Brett had fond memories of Jolie, whom he had been protecting since 2001, and less fond recollections of Pitt.

    Seeking comment from them, we received a bracing phone call from Marty Singer, the couple’s American litigator.

    Singer alleged that Brett wasn’t a reliable source. In fact, he was a “pathological liar.” He said Brett’s lies to U.S. Immigration officials here had led to his being barred from entering this country. Singer said that only recently did Pitt and Jolie discover that Brett, who’d claimed he was a British SAS commando, never even served in the military.

    Singer noted that in 1993 Brett was questioned in the murder of British tycoon Donald Urquhart, though he was later released. In 2006, Brett was arrested for assaulting a restaurant owner in Namibia. The same year, in India, he was accused of choking a photographer and arrested for roughing up and making racial insults against some parents who were trying to pick
    up their kids.

    All told, Singer said, Brett had been convicted 11 times of various crimes.
    Pitt and Jolie had repeatedly come to Brett’s defense. But they apparently came to have doubts about his style of problem-solving.

    As for his book and TV proposals, Singer said Brett was bound by a confidentiality agreement. According to Singer, Brett has now stated that he’d never signed off on the pitches and that many of the yarns attributed to him were fabricated by his ghost writer.

    Brett’s attorneys told us: “Our client disputes what has apparently been said by Mr. Singer, but is not in a position to comment further at this stage.”

    Brett’s ghost writer, Robin McGibbon, insists that he did not embellish the bodyguard’s stories.

    “Mickey was definitely going to consider a book or TV deal if the offer was good enough,” says McGibbon. But at this point, he said, “there’s not going to be any book.”

    http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/04/26/2009-04-26_angelina_jolie_brad_pitt_plan_attack_on_former_bodyguard_over_book.html

    Reply
  552. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:46 am

    A tell all book would be disaster for Jolie – Pitt. Even if there was some exaggeration, I would imagine much truth would also come out. That would hurt these two. NO doubt they are trying to discredit Pitt now.

    While I enjoy many of the posts here, I can’t get into the cryptic stuff, that is just there for fill in to keep people hooked. I wish IH would keep it to news only. Thanks.

    Reply
  553. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:57 am

    Correction:

    A tell all book would be disaster for Jolie – Pitt. Even if there was some exaggeration, I would imagine much truth would also come out. That would hurt these two. NO doubt they are trying to discredit ***Brett now.

    While I enjoy many of the posts here, I can’t get into the cryptic stuff, that is just there for fill in to keep people hooked. I wish IH would keep it to news only. Thanks.

    Reply
  554. Kikumon said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:57 am

    Where did everyone go……Had an idea on the damp basement….http://www.montauklighthouse.com/museum.htm

    Will check back later

    Reply
  555. BigApplette said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    Is there anyone Brangelina can’t buy off? No wonder none of the baby photo money went to charity. It all went to buying silence. In other words, People Magazine’s millions went to Mickey Brett and the nanny who Brangelina failed to have sign a confidentiality agreement. I believe that nanny spoke of a threesome between Brangelina and Karolina Kurnakova (Kurnakova was bragging about it to a make-up artist but later denied it) and said that the Brangelina bedroom was a revolving door. Soon thereafter, the nanny went silent (see National Enquirer). Any wonder why? These two have got to be the most loathsome in Hollywood, in my opinion, of course.

    Reply
  556. Kikumon said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:11 am

    There is certainly a lot of P R work being done today…….They’re getting ready for the story tomorrow……Seattle has new on Mariner film as well…..Busy making up for money lost/spent for silence……No time for kiddies…..

    Reply
  557. BigApplette said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:11 am

    One more thing…why would anyone in the media business be afraid of being sued by Brangelina? It could actually be the best, most lucrative thing that could happen to someone. Here’s why: If you are sued for defamation, a defense to that suit is that the alleged defamation is true. How does one prove that and defend oneself? By taking a deposition of the party under oath. Yup. If Mr. Singer is throwing his threats around, then the public should know that if he sues, they will get the opportunity to depose Brangelina. Can anyone imagine the story that would be? The book rights alone would be worth a fortune. Also, I bet there are a ton of attorneys out there who would be thrilled to take that case. Brangelina function very well on the notion that most people don’t know their rights. Just the thought of Jolie stammering and stuttering, trying to sort out her multiple stories under oath would be priceless. Without her p.r. script, she would really be entertaining to watch. Mr. Singer may be wise to stop threatening people. One day, someone might not back down and his clients will really be in the doghouse (no pun intended, Angie).

    Reply
  558. Kikumon said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    I think this may also be just deflection from more news to come…..Jackie O would not sue as it brought more attention to the books……Later she tried to block them from publication…Good tack or not?

    Can’t wait for my new computer…..This one is awful……Shuts down etc….

    Reply
  559. adtwah said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    @Interplanet Janet:
    Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us! I am a 1 and it describes me down to a T.

    Reply
  560. Billi2 said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:34 am

    @John:

    We were discussing the Mickey’s book on another thread and I wondered if it would ever get to press. From one of your earlier posts on this news on the book it said it was more favorable to AJ than to BP. Probably partly due to BP firing him. With Mickey’s apparent past, it’s a wonder a thorough background check wasn’t done on him before he was hired and entrusted with their family and more specifically the kids? If he was with AJ first, then her vouching for him could explain that. She probably was impressed with his tough guy persona. Now he’s barred from entering the US – wonder if someone’s connection to a certain politician helped out in that regard?

    Reply
  561. Billi2 said on April 26th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    I thought this was interesting.
    New York Post Page Six
    April 26, 2009 —

    TIME managing editor Richard Stengel and Time president Mark Ford are expecting a packed house on May 5 for the mag’s annual Time 100 gala to celebrate the annual list of the most influential people in the world, including President Obama, Brad Pitt and Rush Limbaugh. The gala will take place in Jazz at Lincoln Center’s Allen Room at Time Warner Center, with Jimmy Fallon hosting and a performance by John Legend.

    Reply
  562. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 26th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    Hey Guys!! How’s everyone doing?

    Just stopped by for a quick minute to see if you guys heard of Bea Arthur’s death. I know it’s off-topic, but sad nonetheless. My thoughts and prayers go out to her loved ones. The Golden Girls…. one of the best shows out there.

    Have a great day all.

    RIP Bea

    Reply
  563. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 26th, 2009 at 11:05 am

    Some thoughts on this. Just guessing part of this puzzle. Guessing does not imply this it’s in fact fact.

    The Baster sprinkled with Salt…mongrel bitch = The mongrel here is the product of the mix of JA and AJ in NYC?

    …wore a monocle = When I think of monocles, I think of old school detectives. Put on a monocle to look at something closely. They’re keeping tabs on each other?

    centrifugal existence = At this point, they depend on each other to exist? They can’t exist without the other (all three of them)? BP in the middle (possibly). Synergy.

    gay Butler…just like JM = self-explanatory

    repatriated soldier…thumbing her nose. = JA is the soldier going back home with pride?

    damp basement…junkhouse jealousy…pneumatic drills…too rocky for picks and shovels…illegitimate kitty litter = Gotta get to the bottom of this shithole. A lot ill-will and ill-feelings are festering. Deep-rooted jealousies. Secrets of the origins of the children?

    sustantivo…conjuto de personas gai reunida…ay caramba! = Synergy. Made up of persons gai (gay)? Reunion.

    Reply
  564. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    @cuze:
    isnt “junk” also another word for drugs – could this be a drug den squabble?

    Reply
  565. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    @Togi:
    Forgive my usual ignorance, what is the Xenu every keeps referencing? is that a name for Church of Scientology?

    Reply
  566. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    The logo for the New Yorker is a monocle wearing dandy. wore a monocle=Jen grew up in New York, was a New Yorker?
    Also, the “endowed”, JA’s mother’s maiden name was Dow. I wonder if that is significant or not?

    Reply
  567. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    Heroin is usually referred to as Junk. Junkhouse could be a shooting gallery where junkies go to shoot up. I’m not sure that’s what the word means in this puzzle. Unless it has to do something with 9c’s post on Jenny Shimizu and AJ. I’m not sure, just stating my opinions here. @ladybert62:

    Reply
  568. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    thank you – what is the xenu reference that keeps appearing?

    Reply
  569. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    @Kate:
    I am on here a lot. Dont dare to comment much, and HERE is just an example of why. It seems to me – and maybe I am being a bit simple, but this peron makes a single line comment, and gets positively LAMBASTED for it with a 4 paragraph put down, There are lots of people, I’m sure like me, who frankly are a little intimidated by you and Keane. i’m sorry – have I missed something, is this your exclusive little club????

    Reply
  570. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Karenab i seriously doubt this is exclusive in any manner. I myself am new here, just a few days , however, no one other than one crazy azzwhipe has “lambasted” me for a posting, and most just ignore his/her baiting. I consider this a think tank if you will. Analytical people enjoying putting together pieces of a puzzle. Most graciously admitted to the joint discussion by curtious posters. And besides, It’s’ FUN! Nice to meet you karenab….

    Reply
  571. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @ karenab – nope we’re just dealing with the many, many fakes, imposters and shit-stirrers who have attempted to dissuade people from reading here with the lamest of arguments, discredit Ian or what he is reporting or distract people from the actual story in hand by claiming to be an insider with some incredible scurrilous tale. Unfortunately Kate and I aren’t stupid and we can spot these people a mile off, they just aren’t smart enough. Not by a long, long way. And seeing as this has been going on every day for about 2 months now and we have wasted valuable minutes of our lives telling people to fuck off, our patience is being tried. We are nice and welcoming to all new posters provided they are not here to be total fuckwits or to cause trouble. If someone doesn’t like Ian or what he has to say there is next to no reason for them to be reading here, and absolutely none for them to be commenting. We welcome all opinions, but if all you have to say is Ian is a liar, you’re all so gullible and full of shit, then forgive us if we tell you to kindly fuck off and don’t come back. Its beyond tedious now.

    Reply
  572. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    I do not think the world exlusive is that ja is bisexual I think it is something else also because HH told SR I will disclose the real scoop?

    Reply
  573. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    In every post of mine, I am of course stating my opinion and sharing information. I am mainly interested in human behavior and how money, thus power, can buy anything; except happiness. I am curious as to how so many celebs, with little education except the school of hard knocks, are able to obtain special time with high ranking government officials and admittance into groups that shape foreign policy. I could go on and on and on. HW is overpaid and it is time that something happens to wake people up. I don’t know about you other little people, but normal people with normal jobs have to hold a certain standard of conduct so as not to embarrass the company they work for. Sexting is a huge hit right now, and people are losing their jobs because their boss saw them naked on the internet. Why should it be any different with the “elite?” No one has privacy people, not when you put yourself out there. If you don’t want people knowing your business, change careers or keep you ass in line. You get paid enough. Just sayin’.

    Reply
  574. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Nice to meet you to meet you too Patty Anne. No -one has had a real go at me either, I had one versy terse response to a post, made me feel like an idiot, but I just dont get how a one line post deserves such a response. It seems that if anyone claims any ‘inside knowledge’ ( though it didnt seem this poster did), they are treated like a complete fraud, or and idiot, or a spy. And often by Kate saying she IS ‘in the know’, so she knows thats not true. I’m sorry, but how do we know that? Al these responses from HH / SR to JUST kate and keane – frankly makes me feel like a bit of an interloper.

    Reply
  575. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    ANYWAY, on topic, I think this post is essentially about the relationship between all three of them at the moment (hence the mention of Brangiffer twice), and how they’re all inextricably linked to each other right now. The “centrifugal existence” I think means that their lives are all revolving around each other right now. Still not sure about “endowed and misty” though. It seems like “misty” must refer to Misty Cooper as otherwise it is quite a vague reference to something. Is she one of Ian’s sources who is threatening to write a tell-all about her? “Endowed” can mean “To provide with property, income, or a source of income.” Does this relate to a tell-all or Misty being bought off by AJ? It can also mean “graced or blessed”. Not sure how any of this fits in with the “centrifugal existence” or the gay Gerald Butler and John Mayer references on either side of it though….

    Reply
  576. tyin said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    just to understand, cos im not sure i got the point.
    Is Xenu the opposite of scientology? i mean, is it against it?
    i have to admit i know really a few about scientology, so… there is a lot in this and xenu i dont understand
    Someone can explain me that pls?
    Tnx !

    Reply
  577. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    @Keane:
    how do you feel about this what i was thinking
    I do not think the world exlusive is that ja is bisexual I think it is something else also because HH told SR I will disclose the real scoop? so what is the real scoop not that ja is bi it’s something else but what?

    Reply
  578. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    @karenab:
    Many more than 1 post. Go back 2 and 3 threads. Multiple posts that contradict and don’t make sense.

    Reply
  579. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    @ karenab – subtle but ultimately futile. You reveal yourself with every tack you take. There was absolutey no need to pick up on some comment that was made hundreds of comments before now and when there is so much else that is being discussed in the rest of the thread. And you chose to pick on me and Kate even when there are dozens of other people commenting here. Sorry if Ian’s familiarity with Kate and I is so threatening to you, but we have been here from almost the very beginning of the blog and for a long time there was no-one else commenting as I’m sure you know, so Ian knows us better than everyone else. Trying to make people gang up against us will not help remotely in your aims, as none of your other pathetic little tactics have. People here have their own minds and form their own opinions. If they don’t like someone they either ignore them or give them very short shrift. But here you are picking fights with people when it had absolutely nothing to do with you. And we all know what motivation you have for doing that and its tedious so give up. You haven’t got a hope in hell of outsmarting anyone posting on this board, cos you simply don’t have the intelligence. Give up, grow up and stop thinking you’re ever going to make a blind bit of difference to what goes on here. You’re totally out-classed in every way.

    Reply
  580. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    @Keane:
    “We welcome all opinions, but if all you have to say is Ian is a liar, you’re all so gullible and full of shit, then forgive us if we tell you to kindly fuck off and don’t come back. Its beyond tedious now.”

    But THIS is exactly what I’m talking about. All I was saying was it sometimes seems like this is your exclusive little club, where a couple of people are running the board, anyone who dares to say anything is setting themselves for up for being told to fuck off, which isnt exactly conducive to a good discussion. I thought I was maybe being unfair in bringing you into it, but it truly seems to me that you are running the board together. Your reply proves that.

    Reply
  581. Astro said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    WORLD EXCLUSIVE:

    Angie asked Jen to be the Godmother of one of the Six Kids!!!!!!!.

    But, you know, Jen who has a White Soul, answered: “Angie, I want to be the GodMother of all of them. Thanks.I will love you and Brad forever”.

    Oh Jen…God Bless you.

    Reply
  582. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    @Keane
    Hi there. what if AJ hired GB and JM to spy on JA and BP. What if BP and JA have been together longer than we thought? Maybe AJ is endowed and misty. Big breasts or pregnant(althought I don’t believe this) and misty eyed, crying or from using.

    Reply
  583. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    @Keane:
    A thought… perhaps the centifuge has at the moment BP,+JA and AJ+Misty ? Reading it and thinking of how to interpret it as a “cryptic crossword clue” type, I thought of being endowed as someone who has been given or has a “dow”, which means nothing spelt like that. I didn’t see any possible connection or use for that thought until I went to check if JA was a New Yorker, and on her Wiki page, there was her mother’s maiden name “Dow”.

    The only other thought for Misty that I can come up with is the Clint Eastwood film, “Play Misty for Me” which he starred in and which was his directorial debut.

    Reply
  584. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @ sama – hm I’m not sure to be honest, maybe the scoop is that she’s back with BP as is implied in SR’s post. Not sure! I thought it might be who she was with or had been with lady-wise, as we already know she swings both ways. I don’t usually tend to bother trying to predict what the story will be, I just wait patiently for the info, its all too taxing for the old brain!

    Reply
  585. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    @ karenab – oh just fuck off would you, I’ve got no patience with your little games any more. You don’t like Kate and I because we see through every one of your stupid little disruption tactics and they get you precisely nowhere. I hate to break it to you but you are quite clearly nowhere near as intelligent as you think you are and you won’t get anywhere with your shit-stirring tactics. Give it up, fuck off and move on, there is absolutely no point you carrying on with your stupid little games. A 2 year old could do better. Next!

    Reply
  586. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    @Keane:
    Honest to god, this reply says SO much more about you than it does about me. My aims??????? I am a housewife who lives on the South coast of the UK. i am NOT on Angies payroll or Brads, if thats what youre thinking. I love a gossip, dont like either of them particularly. But just because people dont ALWAYS agree with you doenst mean they are enemies. I actually think most of your and Kates posts are helpful and insightful. Just because I point out that you are sometimes not exactly welcoming, I am immediately the enemy .
    I reveal myself with every tack I take’?????
    And my other PATHETIC tactics ????? – I have dared to comment no more than half a dozen times, all, I hope, in a positive way.
    ‘WE ALL KNOW what motivation you have for doing that’ PRAY TELL !!!
    I should give up and grow up because I am of inferior intelligence and outclassed in every way ???? – I refer to my original post !

    Reply
  587. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @ justhelping – hm I’m not sure, I’m not really sold on this whole John Mayer spying tactics thing yet! Just sounds a wee bit far-fetched and surely Angelina would know what he was up to! Equally I don;t think they would spy on Jen for her either, I’m not sure, think we’l have to wait for a few more posts to get to the bottom of it all. I’m not sure about “misty” either, it is quite a specific word, and I think if it was supposed to imply crying SR could have probably used a different one. “Misty” to me is either a person or refers to weather to me.

    @ Canuck – oh……………. “endowed and misty” – does it mean Jen and this Misty person Ange had an affair with???? It comes after the “mongrel bitch” and wearing a monocle thing which I think is a reference to lesbianism. HW is a very incestuous place, maybe one of the people Jen has been having an affair with was Misty?????

    Reply
  588. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    @ karenab – that’s great Karen, you can just tell me where you live and a bit about that area and I will know for sure you are legit as I know the south coast well. That’s all you need to do to prove to me you are who you say you are.

    Reply
  589. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    @ everyone – quick I need opinions on this “endowed and misty” thing, I think I have it, what do you think????

    Reply
  590. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    Is that why their’s is a centrifugal existence? Their lives are all intertwined and revolving around each other?

    Reply
  591. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    @Keane:
    Hadn’t thought of it that way, I’m reading endowed to be someone else than Jen, as she would be the Dow that someone else would have.

    Did you see “Play Misty for Me”? It’s about a psycho lady who has a one night stand with Eastwood and then stalks him, trying to force him to make her his girlfriend, to the point of befriending his real girlfriend, moving in with her as her roommate and then assaulting her. She also stabbed the housekeeper several times.

    Didn’t we have one post that said that AJ was obsessed with Clint Eastwood’s wife?

    Reply
  592. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    @Keane:
    Cool – what do you want to know?Please bear in mind I have only lived here for 3 years. Before that I lived in Surrey. I spent last night in a very well known hotel across the road from Marylebone station, went to the Cabbages and Frocks market, bought some stuff for my dog. Where I live – 2 miles away from bugger it, but MUCH nicer !!!!

    Reply
  593. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    I keep thinking about the newfound “glow” of Jennifer Aniston. She looks happier now than in the past four years, and seems very contented with her life. Some supposed this to be related to a “new romance” with Butler, BUT, could it actually be due to a rekindled romance with Brad? Some connections are so deep one cannot put them behind in the past, they rather glow inside one’s heart like a “glowing ember”…..jmo

    Reply
  594. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    “endowed and misty” Jennifer pregnant at last and misty eyed with joy? Okay, it’s a stretch i know…

    Reply
  595. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    i think also ja is pregnant and that is the real scoop. hh said also to sr “it will raise eyebrowes at the least” i think that means who is the father of her child?

    Reply
  596. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @sama:
    That would be cool for Jen. Guess we’ll find that one out tomorrow…

    Reply
  597. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    @Keane:

    Agree that “this post is essentially about the relationship between all three of them at the moment” and how they are inextricably linked. I’m thinking the “centrifugal existence” could mean BP is being pulled. A centrifuge is used to separate, so JA is trying to separate him or pull him from the mess that is AJ.

    I previously thought “endowed and misty” was as that BP would be endowed to the kids (always take care of them) but that he was misty-eyed or sad for not being with them all the time anymore.

    Could it be that SR knew BP was going to Niagra Falls yesterday (on the Maid of the Mist boat) with the 2 boys and his parents (photos on JJ) although not sure how the endowed fits in here except again he’ll always take care of them and do things with them.

    Don’t get the gay Gerald Butler and John Mayer references either except to switch back to Jen and say that there is no substance to the Butler rumors cause he is gay just like JM. So this section goes
    First two about AJ – mongrel bitch…wore a monocle
    Second two about BP – centrifugal existence…endowed and misty
    Third two about JA – gay Butler…just like JM

    All JMO

    Reply
  598. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    @sama:
    that refers also to the part “illegitimate kitty litter” because she is not married to the father

    Reply
  599. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @g:
    A dhow is a boat, pronounced exactly like dow… not the Maid of the Mist kind though, more like a fellucca.

    Reply
  600. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    @g:
    meant to add that the “wore a monocle” (AJ keeping an eye on the other two) must be really having some effect. I just saw a X17 video of JA on the Baster set Friday night. Looks like she has 3 bodyguards now. Never have seen that before.
    And why is it that there are daily pics of JA on the set, sometimes her just walking to her trailer, but much fewer than AJ on Salt? Is it because Salt is a studio movie and has more security to keep everyone back but The Baster is just and Indie?

    Reply
  601. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    @g:
    Your centrifugal explanation makes sense to me because as you say, a centrifuge separates things by forcing them apart – the parts do more than just remain suspended in a twirl. :-)

    Reply
  602. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    owed it to posterity…The Baster sprinkled with Salt…
    this part could refer at it as well, he owed it to the child, pregnant by bp?

    Reply
  603. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    Wht is up with the Eastwood film? That story keeps popping up. Remember someone on here that said someone did something horrible to them? Is this anything?

    Reply
  604. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    @sama:
    hmmm? Just thinking here. So BP owes it to Jen to give her the baby she wants and will focus on a relationship with her, with the kids from AJ sprinkled in when he has custody?
    I could see him agreeing to impregnate her (JA) either thru natural or baster methods if she wants a baby ,and if she wants his baby, but it seems like it’s too soon to think about a relationship when he doesn’t even have separation/custody figured out for his current relationship. Maybe they (BP & AJ) won’t have a relationship but he’s agreed or wants to be the sperm donor for her baby?

    Reply
  605. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    i don’t know it was just a thought, maybe they had an affair and she got pregnant or maybe they were seeiing each other longer then we think and she is pregnant by him?

    Reply
  606. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    @g:

    i do not think that he is guilty to give ja a child, I think he is guilty to the child, perhaps they already have a relationship and it has not really time for a long time to wait for a child in connection with her age

    Reply
  607. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    I think if we can go back through the photos taken of Jennifer since she presented at the Oscars, we might have a better clue; she began to radiate joy and happiness from that time. Question: Why? What changed? I have never seen her “glow” quite like she is now, she is projecting a beauty surpassing her privious attractivness by leaps and bounds. It’s for sure Jennifer Aniston is one hellofa happy and satisfied woman!

    Reply
  608. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @g:
    In my opinion of course, Mr. Pitt does not seem to care too much for technical niceties like “am I legally separated” from someone before he follows his little head around and I do think the JA story has to be more than she is bisexual – it would be pretty explosive if she was pregant by BP while he was still helping to spread the image that he is happy with Ms. Jolie.

    Reply
  609. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    @ g – yes I’m with you on most of what you said, and the boat reference is an interesting one – it fits better than anything else, but would SR know this in advance? And yes that could be the deal with regard to him and Jen as the whole post didn’t imply that there was much sex going on, more just friendship maybe? Maybe they decided they owed it to posterity to have a child together? Interestingly the Alice in Wonderland sculpture is reknowned for its surface bearing the marks of the thousands of tiny handprints of the children who have played on it through the years. Hmmm…. interesting. Then we have the “Baster sprinkled with Salt” comment – could it mean the single woman going it alone to have a child, sprinkled with a bit of Salt’s habits, extensive reproduction…. just a thought. Then if the next bit refers to her being bisexual or gay, then maybe he is just fathering her child, they aren’t really getting back together? Hmmm….

    Reply
  610. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    @Keane:
    I wondered that before, if she was the other pregnant woman. So is anyone surprised that there will not be a MB book lol? I had a thought, since he is not writing a book, maybe he is one of the sources Ian is using. ha ha that would be pretty cool.

    I see I was singled out again, this is getting old, maybe time to retire. Hope everyone is having a nice day!

    Cheers!

    Reply
  611. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    @justhelping:
    I think these are at least three disparate thoughts that have appeared in the comments to the posts this week: (1) There was discussion that Ms. Jolie was infatuated (and possibly more) with Mr. Eastwood’s wife whose name I think is “Dena” – something like that; also, there was discussion of Eastwood’s strange movie about obsession with the word “Misty” in the title; and, several posts back (I tried to find it but could not) there was a entry by a person named “ME” who brought up the strange subject of a prior girlfriend of Brad Pitts – the story concerned something about this girl who was between his relationships with Gwenth Paltrow {spelling?} and Jennifer A. who had been physically attacked and was in a coma for 6 days with the inference being that Ms. Jolie was involved in it somehow.

    Reply
  612. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Sorry that last comment of mine was only trying to answer the question that justhelping had.

    Reply
  613. Canuck said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    @ladybert62:
    Sometimes we put up vague ideas and see if it sparks anything in someone else’s mind. I have absolutely no idea if the film “Misty” has anything to do with anything. It just seemed worth mentioning to see if anyone else had ideas that might build on that or not. There was an earlier post about the limo driver who mentioned that AJ was obsessed with Eastwood’s wife. Random connections or coincidence or meaningful, I have no idea.

    Reply
  614. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    @ Kate – I know, I know, I’m in no mood for it today at all, I can’t even be bothered to continue on discussing it with her, its too tedious. But yes it has been a beautiful day in London town! Sounds like we could be on to something with a Jen pregnancy then…. have we seen any recent photos of her lately, any bump action?

    @ Canuck – you could be on to something with that, let’s keep all the balls in the air.

    @ Ladybert62 – the ME poster was a fraud, forget anything they said. No-one who knows BP, AJ and JA intimately would come on here and just spill their guts for no apparent reason. If they were going to spill they’d do it to a journo and probably for money. Its just Ange’s latest distraction/disruption strategy. Yawn!

    Reply
  615. Billi2 said on April 26th, 2009 at 3:59 pm

    @Keane:

    What an ignorant, low class response to someone who only asked a question and made an observation! Welcome everyone to IUC’s onsite bully, thy name is Keane. The only person on this blog who knows who all the fakes and imposters are and she’ll tell you that herself. And you know why. Because you don’t have the intelligence to figure it out yourself. Rather insulting to have your “friend” imply you don’t have a wit of a brain to make up your own mind. Keane I recall several threads back your comments about your experience on other sites and how the posters attacked anyone who had a differing opinion, Just Jared ring a bell? The same thing you complained about there has happened here and I’ve recently observed you’ve got some bullies in training. I really did have high hopes for this site. Expose the dirty secrets of Hollywood so we as the consumer can make an intelligent choice on who deserves our time, our money and our respect/admiration. You have made it unbearable for a lot of intelligent people, myself included. Good luck Ian but somebody should have stepped up and pulled in the reins with Keane. And one last thing. You never did respond to K v K’s question, do you work for Ian? Does someone have a vested interest perchance.

    Reply
  616. sama said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    here is a recent photo from friday
    http://x17online.com/celebrities/jennifer_aniston/bad_hair_day-04252009.php

    Reply
  617. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    @Keane:
    okey dokey Keane – It has been erased from my memory! Thanks for the info, I appreciate it.

    Reply
  618. explain_comingback said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    Jen wants BP back because he’s the best girl she ever had. She must be missing to cuddle BP anus pruritus *roll eyes*.

    This is the best investigative conclusion I’m able to. reach now: JA pregnant with AJ eggs and BP sperm!

    Reply
  619. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    @Billi2:
    Thank you Billi! I really DO enjoy this site, I am really NOT some paid minion sent to stir up trouble. I made an observation, and was told to fuck off repeatedly for my trouble. and told I was unintelligent and a fraud. Keane then demanded proof I am what I claimed to be, which I attempted to do. I really dont see why I should have to, and frankly I am not about to give out personal info on here. But again – just dismissed out of hand. My answers clearly didnt fit with the paranoia that seems to be a constant theme.
    Kate and Keane – I meant NO personal slight – I really think you do a great job on the whole, BUT maybe you could be a little less agressive in your responses.
    But Billi, of course, we will now be in cahoots to discredit them – BIG yawn!!

    Reply
  620. Josie said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    @karenab and billi, I totally agree with you. The site has been ill-moderated at every turn. There has been a great deal of outrageous abuse to the posters. Perhaps some folks need to be more circumspect before posting, and step away from the keyboard more often, or enroll in an anger management class. They are not helping Ian’s “brand,” that’s for sure.

    Reply
  621. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:13 pm

    @karenab:
    HI Karenab: I also think Keane was rough on you – she has quite an acid tongue and once started on a tirade, she seems unable to stop or pull back. It is hard not to be personally insulted – I would be. Anyway, am glad you returned and I did also enjoy Billi’s comments to Keane.

    Reply
  622. Billi2 said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    @karenab:

    You don’t have to explain anything about your background to anyone so they can decide to accept you or not. Absolute nerve to even ask you. Extreme paranoia it’s so ridiculous. But yes we are now in cahoots I’m sure. Nice to talk to you karenab. Peace out.

    Reply
  623. moo said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    @karenab:
    I agree to a certain extent with Keane but not Kate. I find Kate to be one of the most knowledgeable and nicest posters on here but Keane is pretty nasty to people who don’t agree with what is said and is sometimes condescending, feeling the need to point out any imposters to the rest of us uneducated plebs because she is the expert. I reckon it just encourages real trolls to bait her and derail threads. She also denounced another of my favourite posters – Togi as a troll at first.

    Reply
  624. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    @Billi2:
    Thank you guys. It is seriously insulting. And the thing is, so much time seems to be wasted on these battles between posters. I have seen some posts on here that do seem to be decidedly dodgy, but I didnt see that anything I said could be possibly construed in that way. When Keane threw down the challenge, I responded just as a matter of honour really – if I didnt it could have been spun that I was indeed another fraud here to undermine Ians work. There should be space for everyone to have a say without being hounded out of here.
    You do realise theres 3 co-conspirators now :~)

    Reply
  625. halo said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    @karenab
    @Billi2
    @ladybert62

    I agree with your response to the heavy-handedness of Keane. I too enjoy Keane, Kate and others trying to solve the puzzle, but the method to discredit questioning posters is somewhat rough and rude. Correct me if I’m wrong, Keane, but I think you come on strong hoping to out AJ fans and to make them leave. But sometimes IMO it’s a little too strong. Could you please tone down your assaults on new posters until they show their true colors? As you said, eventually the truth comes out with conflicting posts. I’ve been an avid reader of all the gossip and puzzle-solving, especially this past week and weekend. So I’m not trying to stop anything. I’d just like to see a more civil and respectful discussion.

    Thanks, all! :-)

    Reply
  626. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    @halo:
    picture me clapping!! :-)

    Reply
  627. halo said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @ladybert62:

    ty ;-)

    Reply
  628. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I’m clapping too – maybe what I WOULD have said if I hadnt one too many glasses of wine this afternoon! Nicely put!

    Reply
  629. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    @ Billi2 – thanks so much for your kind words Billi I really appreciated that. Kate and I are actually just pretty sick of being attacked by people left, right and centre, day after day after day. They are usually part of Angie’s PR plan, whether you believe that or not is up to you. There have been so many of them on a daily basis that occasionally I mistake a genuine poster for one of them. As I did and freely admitted to with Togi and seem to have done with karenab as well. She did however start it by drawing me into something that had absolutely nothing to do with me and I’m really in no mood to be attacked today for nothing. She also completely misinterpreted the situation with Kate, saying she attacked someone for saying a sentence when in fact they had been dabating on a previous thread for quite some time. But obviously that’s perfectly ok for her to make an unfair attack on Kate and bring me into it when it had nothing to do with me whatsoever right? The people who normally do this are on Ange’s team so it didn’t take much for me to assume it was the case again. Thanks also for your comments about me being nasty to people but in fact the only people I am ever actually nasty to are the people who stupidly attack me, Kate or Ian I think you’ll find. I can’t be arsed to respond to the rest of your very nasty post and won’t discuss anything with you in the future. But yes Billi dear, you are of course correct, I am on Ian’s payroll.

    @ karenab – sorry for mistaking you for the typical troll but there have been so many of them day after day that occasionally I get them wrong, and I do admit that. However, you started it by making an unfair attack on Kate and bringing me into it for absolutely no reason whatsoever. It was nothing to do with me. If I was nasty it was because I thought I was dealing with Ange who has happily called Kate and I a cunt and so forth many times, so that’s the tone I usually take with her. I wouldn’t have done that if I thought you were genuine. I can see now you are, so I am sorry for that. I am just not really in the mood for all this today for reasons that I’m not going to go into here. I just don’t care about this today at all so really didn’t want to get into anything with anyone.

    @ moo – whatever, ditto to what I said to Billi, I most certainly do not think anyone on here is an uneducated pleb at all, in fact I think there are some very intelligent people who I have learnt a lot from. I was merely pointing out the fakes so people don’t waste time responding to them, believing what they say (which is what they want) and getting sucked in. I’m trying to defend Ian. And Togi and I are great friends now so what that has to do with you I really don’t know. But I will remember your comments and won’t get involved with any discussion with you in the future.

    I am so over this today.

    Reply
  630. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    @karenab:
    Laughing at that one – I went and had myself a Baileys after Keane’s triade against you – will probably be a stumbling, crying drunk when her laser gets blasted at me! :_)

    Reply
  631. adtwah said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    @Billi2:
    I really have to agree with you. Newcomers seem to be treated pretty rough around here. I’m turned off by the way many new people have been cussed out or ridiculed, including Karenab. I really think asking her to disclose her location was a bit much. I also think it’s interesting how anyone who has a questioning mind is automatically working for the Brangelina PR juggernaut. I think it’s natural to have differences of opinion. And for the record, I can’t stand Brangie and I do not work for them.

    Reply
  632. explain_comingback said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    I forgot to write: it’s impossible JA to be bisexual.

    Mr. Ian the investigative journalist is a victorian investigative jornalist To label as GAY any person who has had any way of contact witht he same sex: kiss, hug, alos, I suspect, is a strong barrier to admit someone is bisexual.

    Reply
  633. moo said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    Wow so I have been on the end of a Keane tongue lashing – and not the good kind either ;~) I didn’t mean to sound rude though I probably did but sometimes I do quietly object to how you speak to people on here but this is the first time I have spoken. It is you that responds to the fakes the most thus encouraging more. Over at CDACNs posters were going on about how unfriendly we are over here and how paranoid we are and I hate that because I think it detracts from the real issues. I hate confrontation and my stomach is churning while writing this.

    Reply
  634. Kate said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    With all due respect, Keane did try and expalin why Ian tends to single us out, we have been here from the beginning. I was singled out by a poster that was not up on what had gone down pages before, and it had a history, yet she chose to attack me for that response, not knowing anything at all about why I responded the way I did. There was a valid reason I posted the way I did, and it was not because I did not agree with that person or because I feel like I own this board. I have said many times that I am just a poster, no inside information, do not work for Ian, nor does Keane, but I am familiar with his work, long before this blog. I am not not just referring to his books, but Ian is a very talented smart guy. I am just familiar with with him outside the gossip world because he is well known in New York. People come on here and think he is just this crazy blogger they have never heard of or somone who has written a couple of books on stars. That simply is not true, but that is not my battle. Ian is well respected by his peers and I do not need to convince anyone here of that. I think I saw one poster say, oh great, he is going to dump the blog for plays , something along those lines. Well if you were familiar with his work you would know this came as an afterthought and he never said he was dumping the blog. When I responded the way I did it was because that was a wolf in sheeps clothing trying to undermine Ian, and I knew that, and there was a reason I knew.

    I have always tried my best to be as nice as possible to everyone that comes on and encouraged people to get involve, to stay even if we disagree, and to try and start fresh if we get off to a bad start. I do not appreciate however being the topic of conversation day in and day out by deflectors. Keane I am sure is just is tired of it as I am.

    You guys are all doing a terrific job with these riddles, and it has been a great collective effort. It is really fun to see it come together like this, but I think it is time for me to say good bye.

    I will lurk and read, but I do not want my being here to be disruptive to the board. I want to see this board succeed and grow because I believe in Ian Undercover.

    Carry on guys, you are all a terrific bunch of posters!

    Cheers! Kate

    Reply
  635. karenab said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    @ladybert62:
    YOU obviously perform better after one too many :~)

    Thanks for your support, all of you.

    Keane – thankyou for your apology. However, I still dont feel I ‘attacked’ anyone. You seem to have had a shit day, I have had a boozy afternoon, so probably best to call a truce and maybe try another day, if I am brave enough to return. But to come to Billis defence now, if you think their post was ‘very nasty’, maybe you should have another look at what you said to me first. I second absolutely what Halo has said – its not meant to be an attack on you, just some constructive criticism. It seems we are all here for the same reason. In-fighting doesnt get any of us anywhere!

    Reply
  636. moo said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    @Kate:
    Please don’t lurk and read I love your ideas and thoughts before here I had only heard of Ian from his two Kurt Cobain books which I love and I only stumbled on this site because someone put a link on Digital Spy about JG being outed as TT. When I got here and seen the Brange stuff I knew I had found my own persoanal Nirvana! I don’t post often but not because of you and Keane but because I rarely have any constructive ideas. So please don’t leave us xx

    Reply
  637. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    @Kate:
    come on Kate – dont go away – take a break if you must, but I want and need you here – look, picture me pleading, down on my knees (you know what I mean). Buck up and stay here with us. :_)

    Reply
  638. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    @moo:
    You were absolutely not in the least rude – dont even think it..

    Reply
  639. moo said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    I meant to add as much as I don’t like how Keane sometimes speaks to people both you and her are as important to this site as Ian so please don’t lurk.

    Reply
  640. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    @ karenab – I only took that tone with you when I thought you were just another one of the dozens of fake posters who have come on here to attack Kate and I in particular because we corroborate and back up a lot of what Ian says and defend his credibility. You launched into an attack on Kate and I which was misguided at best, totally unfair at worst, and so far after the event that naturally I assumed you were just another troll. I’m sick to death of being attacked, I’m sick to death of all the ignorant crap that people say about Ian on this board and after 2 months or so of it I have zero patience for it. If I had a penny for every word I’ve written defending myself and Ian I wouldn’t be here now, I’d be off in the Caribbean sunning myself somewhere. This has also become much more personal for me than anyone else here as my e-mail account has been hacked into, all my e-mails read, something has happened on another site connected to hacking which I won’t get into, and someone has commented here using my full real name which is identity fraud and I have had to call the police a hundred times because of it. Naturally I am on my guard and angry towards these people, but I won’t let them stop me from commenting here as its what they want and that woman should not be allowed to control the world.

    @ ladybert62 – nothing I’ve said has been directed at you so not sure why you’re bringing yourself into it?

    Reply
  641. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    @moo:
    We all have bad days – things we say when in a temper – things regretted later but not easily retracted/extracted (words are indeed verbal bullets – as one of my past bosses told me when he was telling me to start keeping my mouth shut and to think before I speak – things which are very hard for an Aries like me to do- but even I eventually learned how to improve – somewhat!). So Keane and Kate, come back to us – we will kiss and make up and continue on this rocky road of trying to understand these fun cryptic messages from Ian and SR. :_)

    Reply
  642. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    @ moo – as I keep saying the people who I speak like that to, aren’t genuine posters, they’re the fakes and the people who just come here to stir up trouble and say ignorant crap about Ian. I would never and have never to my knowledge knowingly spoken to another genuine poster like that. I am in fact relieved our ranks are growing as it really was just me and Kate and the trolls for quite a wihle. But I guess the troll’s tactics are working if they are getting people to think that I am nasty to others as that’s exaclty what they’ve been trying to make you think. But like I said, when you’ve been attacked as many times as Kate and I have with initially so fe genuine people posting here, our kneejerk reaction is to defend ourselves and attack back.

    Reply
  643. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    Jolie at the Oscar roundtable on January 18, 2008. Pause at around 4:39 to see a completely flat stomach:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hTVec-w … PL&index=3

    And then four weeks later at the Independant Spirit Awards (where she for some reason decided to bring a 70’s porn star with her)
    I can not seem to post the actual photo here, but you can google her with brad at the Independant Spirit Awards to see it…..from totally flat in the video in January to looking five or six months preggers four weeks later….we’ve been gyped.

    Reply
  644. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    @ everyone – I’m sorry but Kate and I do our best to keep things on track here by getting rid of the fakes and the troublemakers so I’m sure you can appreciate how angry it would make us to be accused of being bullies and how we won’t exactly that well disposed to people as a result of it. All I’ve really been here today to do was to work out what the post meant, I didn’t want to get into a fight with someone over nothing.

    Reply
  645. moo said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I’m a typical Libra and I hate confrontation and arguments with people I cannot see and even don’t know!

    Reply
  646. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    http://www.empathybelly.org/
    This is the outline of angie’s pregnant belly when wearing that long black jersey dress….also, at the January 18th, 2008 round table , in this video, angie has a FLAT belly… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hTVec-w … PL&index=3
    Then just four weeks later, at the Independant Spirit Awards , she poses with a gigantic belly , looking like a normal woman bearing one babe at six month….FOUR WEEKS after the above video at the round table awards showing her flat as a pancake….me thinks the game is afoot!

    Reply
  647. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    @moo:
    I understand completely and I have always wanted to be a libra!!! :_)

    Reply
  648. CC said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Hey there…can you repost the link to the video? I couldn’t get it to work. Thanks!

    Reply
  649. moo said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    @Keane:
    I see where you’re coming from but it is best if they are ignored totally, besides some are quite funny – Astro is a favourite of mine. I believe he is a true Loon and the things he says make me LOL

    Reply
  650. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @Keane:
    ok – explanation accepted! Now, what do you think of Patty anne’s post? Was the pregnancy a fake? I dont recall reading anything from you about it – I havent a clue, as usual.

    Reply
  651. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    @ moo – yes Astro is a total loon, like caea/claea – he doesn’t bother me, I just find him funny. Its the others who have definite tactics who do and often there are quite a few people who fall for it initially. The thing is everyone is then keeping that stuff in mind as if it is gospel and in fact anyone could have made it up, there’s no basis on which to judge it whatsoever. In fact I actually made sure to point out to a lot of people a while back not to speculate on things said by other posters as it discredits Ian’s blog and could lead to legal action for them. The fakes were talking about some supposedly “heinous” things that AJ had done and people were saying was it torture, was it cannibalism, molesting kids etc, you know the worst things imaginable. This instantly rung alarm bells for me because people didn’t realise they were responsible for their own comments legally, that they can be sued and people have been in the past commenting on blogs like this, and I felt it was a trap they were trying to lead people into to bring the blog down. I even posted it when I was out one day to try to stop people doing it as quickly as possible. Other fakes since have given supposed inside stories on dodgy subjects and I’m just trying to stop people from believing or engaging with them. I actually have other people’s best interests at heart so am extremely offended if I am accused of being a bully or pointing out a list of fakes because I think everyone else is too stupid to realise it themselves.

    Reply
  652. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    @Keane:
    And I appreciated your info as I immediately selected an unimaginative moniker and tried to disguise my internet address etc – so I took your advice to heart and sincerely thank you for it and for your concern. :_)

    Reply
  653. Billi2 said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Some last comments from the peanut gallery then I’m really Peace Out.

    When the loons come to this site, they are obvious. No one needs to point them out. Just ignore them. And the explanation that some posters are very subtle and they try to infiltrate reminds me of Karen DioG on American Idol when she goes on and on about the importance of Artistry…enough already!

    Ian is a published author of several books. He’s been reviewed and critiqued by professionals in his field of work. I’m sure along the way he has experienced and weathered criticism by same professionals because it’s the nature of the business and it comes with the territory. He’s not fragile and there’s no need to rally the wagons to protect him by going into attack mode anytime someone disagrees with a thread or what someone has posted. What anyone says on this site is NOT going to make or break his career or his reputation.

    Freedom of speech is a rite, right?

    Reply
  654. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    @ Billi

    While they may be obvious to you Billi, they haven’t been obvious to a great many others which is why I’ve pointed them out. They were very obvious at first but are much more subtle now, but think what you like I really don’t care. I don’t defend Ian purely for his sake but to make sure the truth about these people comes out as it has been a major bugbear of mine for quite some time now. So thanks very much for your instructions but I will say what I like to defend Ian when I like. Your comment to me was as nasty and uncalled for as that which you accused me of and I won’t forget it in a hurry.

    Reply
  655. Billi2 said on April 26th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    @Keane:

    Again no one has a brain to figure it out unless you point it out. Exactly as I pointed out in my earlier post. And your last comment sounds like a threat. Something I won’t forget either.

    Reply
  656. ladybert62 said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    Keane/Kate – help – there is a brand new post and I dont even know who the people pictured are but they are mentioned in connection with Brangie – your expertise is needed elsewhere! :-)

    Reply
  657. Keane said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    @ Billi – utter BS Billi, we have been through several instances where a fake poster has come on and people have believed what they said and discussed it in detail and are still referring to it now. Everyone here has a brain, but not everyone has been reading the blog long enough to know what has been going on and is being played. You are talking utter bullshit and making me very angry. And what utter bulshit that I am threatening you, why the hell would I want or even be able to threaten a random poster on the internet. You misinterpret everything people say, jump to bullshit conclusions and like to throw your weight around as much as you allege I do. I meant I won’t forget what you said to me in a hurry, i.e. I don’t wish to communicate with you any more because I don’t like you. A lot of what you say is utter BS but you say it with an assurance and arrogance that you deplore in others. That’s all I have to say. I’ll just go and count up my pay cheques from Ian now.

    Reply
  658. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @Billi2:

    @John:

    We were discussing the Mickey’s book on another thread and I wondered if it would ever get to press. From one of your earlier posts on this news on the book it said it was more favorable to AJ than to BP. Probably partly due to BP firing him. With Mickey’s apparent past, it’s a wonder a thorough background check wasn’t done on him before he was hired and entrusted with their family and more specifically the kids? If he was with AJ first, then her vouching for him could explain that. She probably was impressed with his tough guy persona. Now he’s barred from entering the US – wonder if someone’s connection to a certain politician helped out in that regard?

    I agree, AJ’s relationship with Brett, then BP coming along most likely was a threat to Brett, as well as a job loss, but I would imagine, there is a lot of info on Jolie that Brett could tell, only have to look at the way she had been with her brother, and the way she treats other people, including her disregard for the relationship between Pitt and Jennifer Aniston – it’s all about AJ. What AJ wants, AJ gets.

    By the way, the two AJ, and JA are complete opposites in nature, as well as their initials.

    I would imagine AJ is frightened by what may come out. Pitt stands the most to lose, by mere association wtih AJ.

    Angeline Jolie made a lot of bad decisions in life: the way she treats her father, how she didn’t care about anyone else but herself when trying to hook up with Brad Pitt, choosing Brett as her body guard, her lesbian relationship, the vial of blood she wore around her neck when with BB, all of these kids she is adopting. It’s all done for show. Pitt has suffered by being with her, it’s having an impact. Everyone in AJ’s life is affected. Those kids of hers look miserable, sad, depressed, insecure – always hiding, looking somber or sucking their thumbs, in just about every picture of them. Those photographs of them are telling. They don’t know how to act like AJ, and put on a good act when the paps are around.

    http://www.blogcdn.com/news.aol.com/the-cooler-blog/media/2007/08/zahara-430.jpg

    http://www.johnnyikon.com/data/articles/2009/03/2391/Picture4.png

    http://www.angelinajoliewatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/brad-angelina-the-edge-02.jpg

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/04/21/brad-angie-stop-and-shop/

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2009&mon=04&evt=pitt-jolie-shop&pic=angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-stop-shop-05.jpg

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2009&mon=04&evt=pitt-jolie-shop&pic=angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-stop-shop-01.jpg

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2009&mon=04&evt=pitt-jolie-shop&pic=angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-stop-shop-02.jpg

    Brad Pitt has certainly aged and looking worn and tired since being in the relationship with Jolie. Probably not what he envisioned the relationship would be like.

    Reply
  659. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hTVec-w … PL&index=3

    There you go CC hope you can pull it up with this one

    Reply
  660. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    Just to throw this out there. I looked up Jo Heims who wrote CE’s movie “Play Misty For Me.” She also wrote an Elvis movie titled “Double Trouble.” A pop singer is working in London. A teenage heiress has a huge crush on him with a guardian who does not have the best interest of the heiress at heart. Pop singer unknowingly smuggles loads of diamonds in his luggage stashed by two crooks. Sorry I always get off track, but I just remember this being discussed or is this eliminated. We can see who could be who? JMO

    Reply
  661. Ray Catone said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    @Kate – we need you Kate. You are the best and the darling of the blog. Please, come back ASAP!!!!
    Te Amo, SRRC

    Reply
  662. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hTVec-wqIU&feature=PlayList&p=DC8C5FDBEFCD84A9&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=3

    Hopefully this will work….i’ll post this and try it myself. No idea what the problem was tho….sorry

    Reply
  663. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    The last url works, i tried it myself, takes you directly to the video – sorry for all the mixup, but it’s well worth a look see.

    Reply
  664. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    Sun, 26 April 2009 at 2:58 pm
    Brad Pitt Visits Niagara Falls (with his parents, and two sons, and without Angelina Jolie)

    LEGENDS OF THE FALL

    Brad Pitt took sons Maddox, 7, and Pax, 5, and his parents, Bill and Jane Pitt, for a bit of sight-seeing at Niagara Falls on Saturday (April 25).

    The Pitts all wore bright blue ponchos as they took in the sights and rode on the world-famous Maid of the Mist steamboat. More info about tourist Brad at BuffaloNews.com.

    Earlier in the day, Brad, his parents, and the boys picked up breakfast at Dunkin’ Donuts.

    Thursday 23rd Apr 2009

    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s acting skills are being tested to the limit as they continue to put a brave public face on their faltering relationship, it’s claimed.

    According to a new report, the loving looks exchanged on the red carpet mask growing resentments between Hollywood’s golden couple.

    “Sure, they look happy in photos,” a family friend tells In Touch. “They are actors and can turn it on for the cameras most of the time.”

    “The cracks in their relationship are getting deeper and deeper.”

    The tabloid cites on blow-up just before Easter, which allegedly resulted in Brad storming out of their rented mansion on Long Island, NY.

    “He told her very clearly that he just can’t live with her anymore,” a friend tells the tabloid. “He said it was over. He was like, ‘I’m outta here,’ and left.”

    Reply
  665. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:02 pm

    @John
    You have great info. HH was in Canada for business or pleasure? All such a conincidence.

    Reply
  666. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    @Ray Catone:
    Agree. Hope Kate and Keane both stay and continue to post. You guys provide a lot of great input.

    Reply
  667. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    Oscar Roundtable January 18, 2008 …. see video url posted above to youtube of this.
    Shows Jolie with flat belly
    July 13, 2008….Angelina “gives birth” to twins.
    Mmmmmmmmmm

    Reply
  668. Astro said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    @John:

    Ok…Good for you John.
    Here the link:

    http://www.buffalonews.com/home/story/651903.html

    Reply
  669. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    John – is there then no chance that Mickey Brett will do the book afterall? I’ll be so very disappointed :-(

    Reply
  670. Kramer Vs. Kramer said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    Well I looked at the YouTube video with low volume and at first i freaked because I thought Marion Cotillard was Jolie and she is very skinny, but Angelina doesn’t show up till the end of the video and I will say she looks quite thin. But don’t women who are pregnant with twins get big quickly. Loved the link to the pregnancy sympathizer site. hilarious !!

    Reply
  671. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    Why thank you Kramer Vs. Kramer. Jolie is one slick chickie who bears second looks and guesses in everything. My point was….. you saw how thin she was January 18th…..she gave birth to TWO babies just under SIX MONTHS after this was taken. One babe, maybe, if it were the first and she genetically carried small, however, this was double the load and a second pregnancy…..she should have been showing A LOT

    Reply
  672. halo said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:28 pm

    @Patty anne:

    Here’s a picture at the Film Independent Spirit Awards on February 23, 2008:
    http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/k_qQv6fx-Qq/2008+Film+Independent+Spirit+Awards+Arrivals/LcgF9vf_1xC/Brad+Pitt

    That IS quite a change in her belly over such a short time! (IMO)

    Reply
  673. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    Lol Kramer Vs. Kramer, this is what i think was Jolie’s twins…uh huh
    http://www.empathybelly.org/ Remember, she portrayed a pregnant woman in a previous film, and thus is familiar with “empathybelly’s” …..lolol

    Reply
  674. halo said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    @Patty anne:

    I agree. Second pregnancies usually show really quickly.

    Reply
  675. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    There is another photo, however i can’t locate it now, in which Jolie is shopping apparently and preparing to get into her vehicle (passanger side) . In it, Jolie is wearing a long, black, jersey material dress….the empathybelly horizontal seam appears to be evident in that photo…. I am deducing, and using my own opinion in these “guesses”….but, i think i’m on to something…

    Reply
  676. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    @ladybert62:
    I know this wasn’t directed at me but thought I’d respond just to let Ian know. No one else interests me like this triangle. Just to remind myself why:
    1) The unnecessary way BP & AJ treated JA after the divorce and for the last 4 years (no matter what occurred prior to the split) and
    2) This post from a previous thread says it all

    cate said on April 6th, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    Neither of them seem to be particularly bright. A decade ago, I lived and worked in the Third World. There were long weeks and months where there was very little power on any given day and a very limited supply of running water every third day, or so. While walking to work, I usually trekked through a barrio where the children wandered naked amidst metal shacks while rats larger than I had ever seen, scared the living daylights out of me. At night, folks were lulled to sleep by the sounds of machine guns. I doubt that either one of the Brangelina promo team has much experience long term stays wherever they go. Always, they are hopping on a jet, bound for a better place.

    St Brangelina? Every few months they do, what seems to amount to, drive through photo ops. They stay in four or five star hotels and admit to feeling better about their own lives after the drive by events. “I can’t complain about my life after seeing so much pain.” Roughly translated, that seems to mean that your pain makes me feel better about my life. Granted, they do bring cameras into horrible regions, Sadly, it takes multi-millionaires to do that. The cameras don’t seem to want to follow real workers in the field. If there isn’t glitz or glamour, it isn’t newsworthy, it seems. After a harrowing few days, they return to the South of France to recover in billionaireland. Watch how defensive she gets when the conspicuous consumption and affluence are challenged in interviews.

    On top of that, two individuals who had no prior experience with children, are adopting an entire team of children from all over the world? Anyone who has either studied developmental psychology or who has helped to raise younger siblings, knows that children need stability and consistency. They need to have regular periods of play, sleep and socialization. Having a sense of personal space and home is crucial. They are dragging those children through airports as though they were tiny verbalized pieces of luggage. I would remain silent were it not for those beautiful little persons who don’t know any other way. The parents have decided that they will be citizens of the world before they ever know what it means to be a little citizen in a safe little kindergarten. Each of them were in their 30s or 40s when they became interested in “the world”. Their minds are barely developed enough to understand some rather simple consequences in the home.

    As it stands now, all they will remember of childhood will be a blurr of airports and hotel rooms. There will be no favorite hiding place, chair, bed,room, bed or blankey. If the insanity hotel employees complain about is true, it most likely can be ascribed to the rootlessness. I hail from a family of six and I can assure one and all that we were not allowed to run through the house like untrained creatures. The condition of having no limits or boundaries only serves as an impediment to personality development.

    In short, they seem to be zig-zagging through life which is fine if their sole concern were fulfilling their own wishes or finding relationships with other adults of ANY persuation; however, there are children in the mix. If chaos and crazy is what THEY want, then pass the children on to people who can offer a stable and relatively sane home to thrive in.

    Reply
  677. halo said on April 26th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    @g:

    Thanks for posting that again. Ladybert says it really well.

    @Patty anne:

    I heard a tabloid employee talking about someone who had a whole range of “empathy bellies” in her closet. I thought she was talking about the rumor of Nicole Kidman’s pregnancy being false (if I remember correctly, and I’m not sure I do, all is only my opinion), but maybe this was about AJ? IDK. Their babies were born in the same month, though.

    Reply
  678. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    g Your post touched me deeply. Such phoniness in all the Brangelina do, and how hurtful to those living in those conditions watching the jolie/pitt prade pass through. With so much pain and suffering in this world, and with all the money and influence of the celibrity world, one would think a huge difference could be made to improve some of those situations. Rather than adopting three kids from three countries, build three orphanages in three countries that need them, staff them with nannies, nurses, helpers. And as for Pitt’s NOLA effort, why NOLA and why not Mississippi that also suffered greatly? Why build houses in an area known to be a flood danger because the land is BELOW sea level to begin with? Use the money to reestablish neighborhoods in SAFE land areas instead. Duplex’s with low rentals or leases …. those poor people can’t afford $150,000 mortgages nor the payments that go with that. Who is going to pay the homeowners insurance in that flood plaine? Might as well have driven thru the Big EZ tossing money out the window. All for publicity in my opinion. Nothing lasting.
    Publicity…..PR…..impress the public…..sell movies…..get rich…..then the circle repeats…. PittIFUL.

    Reply
  679. g said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:26 pm

    @Patty anne:

    Just to note it was Cate that said it real well. Notice the “cate said on April 6th, 2009 at 10:15 pm”

    And yes I agree with you about the NOLA stuff. I admire that he has tried to do something but in my opinion there is no way anyone should be building anything in the 9th ward without completely new levy’s (not a restored system) and even if there was a completely new system I’d still have reservations. There are plenty of other places around NO that would have made more sense. Seems like a vanity project where he got to try out his amateur architecture skills and got other people to pay for a lot of it.

    Reply
  680. CC said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    @Patty anne:
    I think this is the series of photos you’re talking about. IDK, looks like her skirt waistband is what is showing thru her shirt and not a fake belly. Not saying that she didn’t fake it I’m just saying I’m not convinced by these pix…

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery/photos.php?yr=2008&mon=03&evt=jolie-barnes&pic=angelina-jolie-barnes-and-noble-baby-bump-02.jpg

    Reply
  681. justhelping said on April 26th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    G and Pattanne. Well spoken. All of it. It’s all very heartbreaking. I think this should be a lesson to all parents. Not that all parents are bad, but we need to remember we are responsible for raising the future of our world. We need to raise productive, responsible, and caring children amongst other things. We all fight about global warming, wars, religion, but we are not spending the time to make sure that the next gen will be equipped and able to cope in life. This is another tragic example and quite possibly in the future some of these children will face the same problems and more than their parents. JMO

    Reply
  682. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    Taken March 10th, 2008. Two months after the January 18th, 2008 Oscar Round Table event on the youtube video. Still amazing to me that she could go from absolutely FLAT to this large in two months with them being born July 13, 2008. However CC, you have wonderful vision. I didn’t notice it was two pieces rather than one long dress. thank you

    Reply
  683. Patty anne said on April 26th, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    just like JM…bewildered shepherd…ardor and vitality…repatriated soldier…thumbing her nose..
    Just like JM = Johnny Miller druggie
    Bewildered shepherd = starred in The Good Shepherd, bewildered at Brad’s new stance
    Ardor and Vitality = She’s renewed with a new “lust ” in her life, no longer a dead horse who has no idea he’s dead as she stated recently.
    Repatraited Soldier = She’s back to what she knows in life and is comfortible with (old habits)
    Thumbing Her Nose = At Brad. Doing what she wants with no concern for Brad or the family. It’s beyond over for Angie.
    Could be, might be, don’t know, just a guess…..

    Reply
  684. Fan said on April 26th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    @Patty anne:

    Sounds right on to me.

    Reply
  685. Occam's Razor said on April 26th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    I’ve been observing this illogical confabulation for a while and I have some questions;

    Are all these stories simply creations of a collectively overactive imagination; a type of mass hysteria manifesting from mistaken conclusions?

    Would you trust the character of someone who leaks information, especially since they are breaching the confidence of those who put their trust in them in the first place?

    Is there any factual or concrete evidence that any of the hearsay is true?

    Without any actual film or photographs, can any of it be verified?

    And since we’re living in the age of Photoshop and CGI, can any of the produced evidence be trusted as verifiable?

    These are simple questions that need to be asked before any irrational or fictitious conclusions are drawn by the flawed logic of the uniformed.

    Reply
  686. CC said on April 26th, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    @Patty anne:
    Repatraited soldier…this is interesting.

    I found this definition: Repatraite: To restore or return to the country of birth, citizenship, or origin: repatriate war refugees

    Do you think this refers to one of the adopted kids being returned due to bogus adoption?

    I like your definition better because I shudder to think about those kids facing more heartache…but it got me thinking…

    Reply
  687. CC said on April 26th, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    “endowed and misty…gay Butler…just like JM”

    Theory: Gerard Butler and John Mayer are well endowed, gay and have been linked to JA…

    Reply
  688. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    @John:
    “have recruited some of the most fearsome libel attorneys in the U.S. and the U.K. to
    make sure Brett’s lips stay zipped.” So what are they so afraid of, unless a lot of this stuff is true. Is this a he said she said fight? I wonder if MB has proof.

    Reply
  689. Z said on April 26th, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    @g:
    I really agree with you and Patty Anne, too. It seems it’s all for their reputations. They have money that could make some lasting changes. And they are not even spending much at all, is what it looks like. The whole foundation seems shady, imo. They have put very little $$ in compared to what they said they would. And I won’t even get started on the PR stunts w/ their children….burns me up.

    Reply
  690. carrie said on April 26th, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    @Patty anne:I’d say Jen has been happy and glowing for about a year and a half now. Or at least she certainly has compared to her ex and his babymama. She seems to have grown younger where as they seem to have grown much, much older. Of course and bad relationship, 6 kids, no stable home, moving all over the world and working non stop to pay for it all will do that to you. LOL!

    Reply
  691. carrie said on April 26th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

    @CC:They are both rumored to have big dicks. I have to say I don’t believe anyone is gay or bisexual except Jolie.

    Reply
  692. CC said on April 26th, 2009 at 11:30 pm

    @carrie:
    This is a blind vice item from Ted Casablanca from Jan of 2008. It was rumored to be about John Mayer and Jen Aniston:

    ” Oh, sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll, what else is new in T-town, right? Just homosexual sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll, that’s what. (Like this is a news flash, but hey, I’m just the goss messenger here, ‘kay?) Sally Sedate Me has hooked up with her latest man. You saw that, didn’tcha? Yep, sure ya did. This latest guy is simply divine, so delish, much more so than the last loser the sweetie star hung out with.

    Indeed, fans are so relieved SSM has found herself a he-man worthy of her luscious locks, winning smile and utterly adorable personality. It’s a tabloid team made in heaven! Why? Well, because New Guy’s also got a killer grin, a fab sense of humor, a total do-me coif and—best of all—absolutely no desire whatsoever to make love to Sally, just like she likes it.

    See, Sally-Sweets lives for getting high, not orgasmic. But she likes the company, and she knows her career will suffer if she’s seen manless for too long. And New Guy, ‘course, wouldn’t even have a job if his homo ways were known. Or so he thinks.

    Sally really should get over her habit, already. Doesn’t she see it’s what’s marginalizing her career, not her male companionship (or lack thereof)? It’s a good flick that’s hard to find, not a fella or a fix.”….

    Pretty interesting…especially the bit about Jen (Sally Sedate Me) not liking sex…

    Reply
  693. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    @justhelping:

    I think that Pitt is trying to spend more time away from Jolie, and I remember hearing that Pitt’s parents liked Aniston, didn’t seem to warm up to Jolie. So, being spotted in Niagara Falls with his parents and sons on the day he was supposed to be with Jolie, is kind of interesting. If he was in NYC or even Albany, a jaunt over to Niagara Falls is about an hour or so by plane from NYC, and Albany is a fair trip by car. Kind of unusual to just up and do that on a Saturday afternoon. Pitt must be very bored with his life now, or trying to distance himself from homelife.

    He looks tired, worn, pudgier, stressed and older. Being with Jolie has really changed Pitt. Their brood of kids never look happy, almost as unhappy as Pitt. Those kids don’t understand acting; so they play themselves.

    http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news?id=47020

    I do think that Pitt and Jolie are in for a rough ride, it was a big mistake hiring someone like Brett who is possessive, self serving, unorthodox and unenthical, someone like him is trouble, but that’s the typical kind of decisions Jolie makes. Pitt no doubt is obviously regretting being Jolie’s decisions, even by virtue of associating with Jolie. It’s impacted his life and showing on his face. Brett’s history and background looks rough, and he doesn’t seem like someone who would back down to anyone. If he’s got dirt on Jolie my guess is it’s coming out. Sounds like Pitt didn’t trust Brett’s character.

    Batten down, Benjamin Button. It may not be all family bliss and Oscar gold for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    InTouch magazine has some pretty explosive speculation this week. Apparently, Mickey Brett, a longtime Jolie bodyguard formerly in the employ of Nicole Kidman, is ready to sing like a bird over his tenure with the pair.

    Among the delicious (and potentially litigious) dirt on Brad, 45, and 33-year-old Angie that Brett is pimping out as fact to prospective publishers:

    Angelina used kinky toys and costumes to indulge Brad’s every fantasy on the Mr. & Mrs. Smith set, thus luring him away from Jennifer Aniston.
    Bodyguard Brett and Jolie would often poke fun at 40-year-old Pitt’s general lack of knowledge on many topics.
    Angelina has coordinated affairs while with Brad, including an alleged series of trysts with a female pop star: “Mickey set up at least 20 secret meetings for Angie with this woman at hotels when Brad was working,” a source tells the mag.
    The power couple may not be able to block publication—Brett is said to have been contracted without a confidentiality agreement.

    On the other side of the coin, however, Brett hasn’t the rosiest past. He was once questioned in a murder case, was accused of using intimidation and racial slurs on the set of A Mighty Heart and has been caught on film choking a paparazzi.

    Sounds like a perfect Wrestler follow-up role for Mickey Rourke!

    Fret not for Brad and Angie, though. They know how to play by the rules of fame.

    Quotables /
    “Brett, who was fired last year, will dish “all the sordid details of how they (Pitt and Jolie) got together while Brad was still married to Jennifer Aniston,” claims a snitch.”
    Socialite Life

    http://www.celebuzz.com/fromer-jolie-pitt-bodyguard-shopping-s80461/

    Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt’s chief & beloved bodyguard Mickey Brett is facing legal action in Namibia on charges of assaulting a restaurant owner. The Irish-born hooligan will be summoned before a Namibian court for reportedly beating up Thenus Duvenhage & subsequently damaging his eye.

    Brett has been widely criticized for his heavy-handed approach to bodyguarding & caused controversy while taking care of the Jolie-Pitt family as they were preparing for the birth of their first biological child together in the African country. Duvenhage stated that he was escorted off from an area where the Hollywood couple were present & made an “offending sign” before driving off.

    The Namibian local alleges Brett gave chase after the finger was produced, forcing Duvenhage’s car off the road. He goes on to state that he was kicked & punched by the bodyguard Brett & has serious injury to his eye.

    Duvenhage’s lawyer announced, “Since Brett is a foreign national and about to leave the country, we abandoned the arrest because he deposited a sum of money as security at his lawyer’s office, covering the damages claimed plus legal costs.

    “We now contemplate when to have the summons issued to Brett and the law will take its course.”

    Meanwhile the Jolie-Pitt tribe left Namibia Saturday following their April 5th arrival. In a recent press conference Brad Pit offered, “We are very proud that our daughter was born here, and we leave with fond memories and definitely hungry to return.”

    http://www.celebrific.com/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-bodyguard-mickey-brett-namibia-assault-case/

    Brad Pitt’s bodyguard is making the paparazzi painfully aware that he does not like the paparazzi trying to get pictures of his clients. Brangelina are in Pune, India as Angie prepares to start shooting “A Mighty Heart.” Photogs, including our own, have been staking out Le Meridian hotel there, trying their damnedest to get a shot of the ellusive couple and their kids. And by the looks of it, it ain’t gonna be easy with thugs like this around.

    This brute was the family’s bodyguard in Paris, just before Shiloh’s birth, and now he’s travelled with the couple to India to take on the paparazzi there.

    Check out the poor photog’s neck injury after the jump …

    http://x17online.com/celebrities/brads_bodyguard_a_bully.php

    Brad Pitt Regrets Leaving Jennifer Aniston For Angelina Jolie?
    The actor is said to still harbour strong feelings for his ex…
    Friday 06th Feb 2009
    …more Angelina Jolie »
    Brad Pitt still holds a candle for ex-wife Jennifer Aniston, according to a new report.

    The Fight Club star – who divorced Jennifer in 2005 – is reportedly missing his former spouse as things become more and more intense with his and current partner Angelina Jolie’s rapidly expanding brood.

    A source tells the National Enquirer, “The way Brad talks about Jen is enough to make his drinking buddies wonder that maybe, after all this time, he wishes he hadn’t broken up with her.

    “You just get the feeling Brad now knows he could always be himself around Jennifer and he can’t with Angelina.”

    The source adds, “I’ll bet he’s secretly lusting after Jen as she turns 40. She’s sexier than ever.

    “Surely he had more than a twinge of jealousy when she got back with John Mayer. Drinking buddies have even teased him about his ex and how she’s dating a young buck!

    “Brad’s in a lonely, emotional place with his woman. But it’s a place he chose and can’t just up and leave – not with those kids!

    “The best he can do is keep finding comfort in booze, but only until Angie tells him no more – or else!”

    http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news?id=47020

    Reply
  694. John said on April 26th, 2009 at 11:46 pm

    @Z:

    Brett may have proof, but some of it imo, is also spite as Pitt fired him. He will most likely be more protective of Jolie and not disclose about her, and sling more mud at Pitt – that may have been about Jolie. Thing is, it’s going to cost them financially to fight this. It may also ruin their careers.

    Reply
  695. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 12:55 am

    @Kate:
    KATE!!!! COME BACK! Darn … what the heck happened? I was reading along, going … whaaaaaat????? Mob mentality much? This is the only way I know how to send a message to you, so this will have to suffice. :-) I’m sure it is really draining to always be singled out and placed under attack. You and Keane both do such a great job keeping things on track. Obviously, that can’t be easy considering all the banter that goes on in the middle of the day. We all my, as you say “contribute” in our own ways, but it’s obvious as well that you and Keane BOTH are the heart of the conversation. I really hope you don’t go. Selfishly because you are the level-head and somehow manage to keep track of the facts. Personally, because I have really come to like you. You’re one of the only people (besides Z and occasionally P and Mama) who come on late at night. Who else am I gonna talk to??????? Boooo hooooo (that’s me crying :-(

    Reply
  696. g said on April 27th, 2009 at 1:00 am

    @CC:
    As of this past Dec, Jen had never been the subject of a BV.
    From Ted Bitch-Back Dec 19, 2008
    Dear Ted:
    Has Jennifer Aniston ever been the subject of a Blind Vice? I am so sick of her Goody Two-shoes act. Always the victim, it is getting old!
    —Lauren
    Dear Good Girl:
    Actually, no, not interesting enough!

    http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b74121_bitch-back_enough_with_jen_vs_angie.html

    Also, Jen said on Letterman she met John at an Oscar party in Feb 2008.

    Reply
  697. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 1:11 am

    @Ray Catone:
    Sugar … I couldn’t agree with you more. I miss her already and I just logged on and it’s almost 10:00 pm.. AK time.

    Keane: Sorry I wasn’t here this afternoon to stick up for you guys because I sure as heck would have! Darn.

    Everyone else and newbies in particular: There are A LOT of posers on this site right now. They have been completely accepted because they have been respectful and have been participating. Everyone is welcomed on those terms. I feel I can speak on this topic because Keane did mistake me for a troll and I was initially attacked (and traumatized LOL :-) ) But because I am NOT a troll and I really was here for the reasons I initially stated, I just came back and continued to be ME. It’s pretty simple, really. Everyone has a “right” to be here. And, as those of you who have been around for at least awhile know, we DO disagree (or have different ideas) about things. We don’t call each other idiots and worse. Keane’s reactions are not to those with a different opinion. I totally agree with Kate and Keane that in order to understand their reactions you need to read the posts. It isn’t as simple as some of you may think.

    And as far as this being a closed “club”? Hog wash! Does someone have a right to come on and stir up problems? Sure they do. Would it be best to ignore them? Sure it would. Is it possible to ALWAYS turn the other cheek? For Jesus, maybe … but we SUCK at being perfect! Yes, lots of us contribute. But I don’t think it could be argued the main contributors to the site are. Does that give K&K “control” of the site? No, Ian has control. But Ian KNOWS them and trusts them. And because K&K have put so much of their brain power (which is SUBSTANTIAL AT THAT) into this site, I believe they have every right to speak up when someone is undermining!!!! Just my opinion on this, folks. It’s a rather strong opinion, but just an opinion at that.

    Reply
  698. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 1:40 am

    @Togi:
    Hey Togi, well said. : ) I am reading a book and the author brought up the Jesus smack-down! Loved it!!

    Reply
  699. Alif said on April 27th, 2009 at 1:56 am

    Keane;
    Just want to say I sometimes can tell when a poster doesn’t sound authentic. It seems to me to be a “hit and run” type of post. Usually a cluster of them. They leave it to us to clean up the crap they throw at you, Ian and Kate.
    And you know what? We, the rest of us, don’t usually step up to the podium to rebut them. We just assume everybody else can see right thru the fakery. Hmmm!
    Anyhow that’s how I see it. If I was as knowledgeable as you three, I might be more than a bit impatient with the annoyances, as well. Especially after all the harrassment you have experienced.
    I can just picture the loonies high-fiving, going YES! after reading the cluster of anti-Keane posts after Karenab started her rant.
    I can understand her viewpoint, however, as I do yours. But I do want to say if no one spoke up against any loony post, the loonies would then think they have succeeded in thwarting Ian, Keane and Kate. JMO!

    Reply
  700. disgusted said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:02 am

    I have read this site off and on as I would like the media to stop catering to the fauxmanitarian, child abusing, power hungry, stupid and talentless duo who are Brandgelina. However, one of the other things I detest is the way the media and blogs, some of them under the employ of the Brand, Ted C, Perez, Lamey and likely others, repeat lies and misinterpretations about Aniston that they make up wholesale,see Lamey, or print whenever they have a slightly incriminating story about the Brand. (see Ted C)

    Does it not concern you that there is no evidence Jennifer Aniston is gay? or Bi? There is no reason to believe the stupid story from Ted C (possibly about her-but made up of lies as she is not a known drug user, and contrary to media reports, her career is not faultering) so why link her to this garbage blind item?

    She is also not adverse to sex, which anyone who recalls Pitt and their courtship and marriage will recall. He has said he designed the bathroom and attached bedroom when he hooked up with Jen, as “he had a dirty mind”. If they had issues, they were never noted as sexual.

    However, you are ready to believe that Mayer is gay (based on his kissing Perez for shock value after months of being mocked by him) and that Gerard Butler who has admitted he may be bi, is also gay and despite there being no relationship between them other than business, now both men are beards for Jennifer who you have decided is gay or at least bi, with no proof at all. You are also willing to believe she is seeing Pitt again after the hell he has and continues to put her through.

    There is no way that Jennifer will speak on the record to Ian, he will repeat one of the many lies spread by loons or so called insiders that litter the internet. I believe some are paid by the Brand to deflect bad attention on them back to her. It is the “jenhags” that object to Brandgelina’s behavior, don’t you know that? If it wasn’t for jennifer the entire universe would love and praise the Brand for their goodness.

    am really shocked that posters here are willing to drag her back into this mess. She has been through enough and continues to live under a cloud of hate. It is absolutely wrong. And while there are some reports (only seen here) that she is staying inside, there are others having her going out for dinner with different friends and having a great time on the shoot with Jason Bateman, and the director. She was seen at dinner recently with Brett Ratner and others, he may be a director she is working with or thinking of working with, as she has so many projects going for such a failure. The loons of course say she is flirting with the married director as they are too immature to understand adult relationships.

    I have supported this site as another spot for antis to get the word out on the reality behind the charade of Brandgelina. However, as soon as Jennifer was brought in, along with Gerard and John being gay, which neither is, that was it. I wish you would leave Jennifer out of this. She is a kind person and likely feels sorry for Pitt, but I would be very shocked if she is anything other than a casual friend to him at this point. He doesn’t deserve her attention and she has already been kinder to him than he deserves. Brandgelina are dirty, and any way that comes out is legitimate, IMO. Aniston is not, she is an actress who Brandgelina and their fans, assisted by the media have dragged down for four years and counting. She is criticized for things no one else would be, and not given credit for her successes. It is really sad to see you going down this road, and lumping her in with these trashy losers. Please remember you are slandering her and feeding ammunition to Brandgelina’s army. No more visits to this site for me, this has gone too far.

    Reply
  701. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:04 am

    @Alif:
    Yeah, some do hit and run and some attack, attack, attack!! Like that asshat. Sometimes I just ignore them…so the blog doesn’t get too filled up on their account (and w/ their crap)…but that person really pissed me off….and was also an obvious poser or loon (seriously loony!!). Some are not as obvious.

    Reply
  702. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:17 am

    @Z:
    Hi Z! Which book are you reading? Yeah, I love that term, the “Jesus smack-down.” I do a lot of things with kids and REALLY like teens a LOT. That’s a term they like to use as well.

    Don’t know about you, but that gang bang on Keane today really bothered me! I certainly believe Keane has earned enough respect as a superior poster on this site! Not sure how Kate even was pulled into it … from what I could tell she wasn’t even on the board at the time, and if ever there was a voice of reason, it is Kate. I don’t even respond to dorky, insulting posts because they are only meant to bait. But I will respond to a gang-up. Not that Keane can’t handle herself. LOL. If it’s between two posters, that’s one thing. But don’t gang up!!!

    Reply
  703. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:22 am

    @Z:
    “Some are not as obvious.”

    ABSOLUTELY, Z!!!! When a regular starts turning weird I just tune them out from that point on. I’ll read their coherent posts but won’t follow any weird trails they may lay down. Just another reason I really appreciate the K’s. I’m a good idea person but not so good at keeping track of the ideas. Unfortunately, organization isn’t one of my strong points . :-( Haaa haaa! Also, when totally unrelated stuff comes up, or just completely off the wall. Not that the posters are benign or anything. I just don’t follow the bouncing ball … LOL

    Reply
  704. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:30 am

    @Togi:
    I did not mean to use the word “benign” up above. I have not been well today and my brain has taken off for the Sabbath! Haaa haa. What I meant was that I don’t believe all the posters who get distracted are purposely trying to get others off track! It’s well known that in churches, at least, 10% of the people doe 100% of the work. I would imagine that statistic holds in other arenas as well. Here, I would say that 2% do 100% of the work! LOL. Unfortunately, though I may try, I may add a whopping .000000001 % to the whole! Baaaha haaa aaa a WHAAAAAA! (That’s me crying!!!!)

    Reply
  705. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:37 am

    @Togi:
    Hey Togi! You still here?

    Reply
  706. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:42 am

    Yep.

    Reply
  707. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:48 am

    @Togi:
    Well, even if you aren’t…The books are by Haven Kimmel. Have you read them? I think you would like them….she writes about her childhood in two books…The Jesus smack-down was in the 2nd one. She is hilarious, and so endearing. I love these books (about Zippy…her nickname)!!! I just can’t say enough about them. Her family is Quacker…but her dad is an atheist…and this theme runs throughout….you should read them! They are so funny and really charming (weird word, but true).

    I wasn’t on much today (sick boy)….so I missed the Keane attack…I’ll go through and read…if I can take it. That does bother me, when I’ve seen it before. Got to talk with you…if this is that. …lol.

    Reply
  708. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:49 am

    @Z:
    Yeah … I’m here with nothing to do but notice all the stinking TYPOS I just made in my latest posts. How humiliating!

    Reply
  709. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:50 am

    Good to talk…not got….I’m tired.

    Reply
  710. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:51 am

    @Togi:
    Funny you should say that…LOL …see above post.

    Reply
  711. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:55 am

    @Togi:
    Me too…Lyme has really messed with my brain…so I can’t remember a lot….and have a hard time following sometimes. It is very strange when a regular gets all negative…is that what happened?

    Reply
  712. Kate said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:55 am

    @Togi:
    Hey Togi,Z,Alf-

    Thank all you for your kind words. I really do not want to see any division in the board and thought perhaps some are starting to resent my presence here. Keane was brought it because she knew the history of my post and why I said what I did about someone trying to deflect the story Ian was working on. She was trying to explain and defend me. I feel really sick to my stomach the way Keane was treated because I think most know the background there. I have never seen Keane ever be rude or call anyone out because she did not agree with a point of view.She explained very well how these things do come about. The poster that called me out maybe did not know it had been an on going debate and they insisted on deflection. I can not in good faith that go and I would hope no one else here would either.

    Ian has worked hard this story and Sugar Ray and it is just indecent for those of us who believe in them to sit idly by and say nothing. I stand up for my friends, my kids, my family, our colleagues, anyone respect, and my country and God. We all are from different walks of life but this board has been different and special because of the kinds of posters we have here.

    Alf you are right, they are probaly doing a high five, and we do not want that to happen. I needed to step back and evaluate this for a bit and Keane made the same point. I do not like all the back biting, so with that let us all move forward together.

    Z thanks for always a good debate too you guys are really intelligent thoughtful posters. P is so funny love her wit, so many here that I can’t even remember right now but there is not one single poster on here that has not been a great contributor to this site.

    Sugar Ray thanks sweets very kind of you , I hope we can all just start over and support each other and give a big shout out welcome to Karen-

    last you guys please do not ever think that I or Keane feel superior to anyone. I wish everyone had all been here from the beginning but since we can not go back , glad everyone is here now. Dina and Section I think were here to welcome me so thanks to both of them I hung around. Smart and nice people and that is what I love about this blog, “we the people”.

    I

    N

    A
    Ds

    Reply
  713. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 2:59 am

    @Togi:
    LOL…don’t worry sweetie! People love you!!!! But you are right….it happens everywhere…..and a lot of times it is 2% that do 100% of the work. So funny you should say that because it is something my husband talks about a lot…and recently.

    Reply
  714. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:01 am

    @Kate:
    Oh Kate! you are wonderful! I didn’t read everything you wrote yet, because I had to get that out!!! You are fabulous!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  715. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:09 am

    @Kate:
    I know you guys don’t feel superior! And I think Keane – and all of us! – get frustrated with the loons and liars. (I’m getting so tired I can’t type…lol). I missed what happened today…it does not sound good. : (( I love this place, because it is fun, but intelligent. I get really riled up when the loons start calling names. Ugh. The hard part is when someone is so slick you can’t tell (well, let me rephrase that) I can’t tell that they aren’t for real. I think Keane said sit back and watch…see if they come back…see what they are saying. Very good advice. I love you guys and all the regulars! This is a special place.

    Reply
  716. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:11 am

    @Kate:

    Yeah Kate. I’m relieved to read you type this way! Gotta figure you’re tired. I’ve been wiped out myself, today. With the time difference, by the time I check the boards y’all are well underway. By the time I get the bottom of the posts, mystery is almost solved! Lol. Welcome BACK … and I look forward to Ian’s blog tomorrow. :-)

    Reply
  717. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:13 am

    Well, I better try to sleep. p.s. Kate, so right on about P’s wit…she’s hilarious!

    Reply
  718. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:15 am

    @Togi:
    Me too, Togi!! I am always behind. ; ) Night guys.

    Reply
  719. g said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    @Kate:
    Kate, glad to see you back.
    And try to let it roll off you instead of getting sick to your stomach. Not worth it.

    Reply
  720. Kate said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:20 am

    P@Togi:
    yes tired migraine again on my IPOD and it is too much trouble to be spot on-that was long post for a IPOD

    Yes? LOL

    Reply
  721. g said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:22 am

    @Z:
    We’ve always followed the 80/20 rule at work. 20% of the people do 80% of the work or the last 20% of a project takes 80% of the time.
    aka The Pareto Principle
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

    Reply
  722. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:26 am

    @Kate:
    Very impressive, indeed, for an iPod post! Wow! LOL. Get some sleep Kate! There will be new mysteries to solve tomorrow! I’m going to join the ranks of Z and all those who have gone before me … to their awaiting beds and pillows! XXOOXOXOXOX

    Reply
  723. bazoonk said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:29 am

    I love this site, but don’t post on it because I can never figure out the riddles as well as some of the other posters on here can. But I do want to say that I really hope that you change your mind about posting Kate, as you’re awesome at solving the problems, and I think most people on here really respect your opinions. It would be a loss if you decided not to be involved anymore.

    Reply
  724. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:29 am

    @g:
    LOL … thanks “g” for the REAL saying. My hubby says it all the time in regards to all the work I volunteer to do! I knew it was SOMETHING like that … my thought process is SHOT for the day. Hold down the board, would ya?

    Reply
  725. bazoonk said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:30 am

    @bazoonk:
    Ooops never mind, you’re back!

    Reply
  726. Kate said on April 27th, 2009 at 3:34 am

    @g:
    thanks g, new day..tried to look at Spence&Heidi sounds like the end was saying Brad is being asked to pretend for a bit to promote his films-

    well the axert and double vicodin has kicked my butt so going to bed, just wanted to thank all of you and tell everyone that I know Ian appreciates everyone here and I know that the majority here have come to think of Ian and Sr and Miss Nines as a friend, I think I can speak for Keane as well when I say we just enjoy the hell out of posting with so many great people!

    Reply
  727. karenab said on April 27th, 2009 at 4:03 am

    @Kate:
    Good morning Kate. As I think I said a couple of times yesterday, I DO think that you, Keane and several others do a bloody fantastic job of deciphering and working through these cryptic posts. I have only posted a couple of times, but that doesnt mean I’m not reading every word, and working away on the internet trying to get clues too. In hindsight (a wonderful thing) maybe I shouldnt have called you out over the post as I did, maybe I should have looked at what had gone before. I had been off the board for 36 hours, (off having a good time) and a LOT gets said in that time. But I have seen it before, people getting slapped down remorselessly. Obviously the weirdos are frustrating, but most of us can see them for what they are – I think I was the one last week who pointed out that 3 posts supposedly from Sugar Ray probably were fake. My post, I felt wasnt a loony rant – thank you guys – I’m not a poser, or a loony, or a troll and I’m certainly not high fiving anyone. And yes, I’m back. I havent been away. No – its not nice when people are ganged up on, but guess what, thats just how I feel. I’m not trying to divide the board, that was never my intention, more to say that there is room here for everyone, if they could be allowed to feel more welcome.
    I was most grateful for the supportive comments I received, as I’m sure Kate and Keane are for your support this morning. But they got blasted for their trouble too. All we were ALL saying was if the venom could be dialled back a bit, maybe more people would feel they could comment. I was challenged to prove myself, which I thought I did, and didnt even get a response, just an aside to you that she couldnt be bothered discussing it with me anymore. It sometimes seems its easier to believe that ALL newbies are trolls and trouble makers. With that attitude prevailing (and I’m not talking about you personally, Kate, just a general comment) you wont GET any new blood.
    Thats all Im saying. Kate – as soon as there is a new riddle its YOUR response I scroll down to see, as you seem to be the only one weird enough to figure it out. And that is a LOL, not a dig :)

    Reply
  728. moo said on April 27th, 2009 at 5:38 am

    @Kate:

    Glad to see your back. When I got up this morning I felt gutted that you hadn’t been back on through the night (well my night anyway, I don’t know what time you are on). I know what you mean about coming to see Ian, SR and Ms 9cents as friends as I too feel like that. I moved to a foreign country with my husband July last year so I am away from the rest of my family and friends, I don’t work and my husbands work means he is away alot so all I have is my 6 year old son and you lot! Looking back at the posts from last night it does look like there was some mob mentality going on but I just felt that how Keane responded to Karenab was alittle unjustified. It also seems what I said also helped to derail this thread for a while which is exactly what I accused people who respond to trolls do. Also about the CDACNs thing where I said the posters on here were getting slagged of, thinking about it maybe it is part of someones agenda to discredit this site to stop people coming over (I hope that rings true and I’m not getting too paranoid!).

    Reply
  729. Canuck said on April 27th, 2009 at 5:47 am

    @Kate:
    Glad you stayed, this place wouldn’t be the same without you.

    @Keane:
    I’ve been enjoying learning all sorts of new British slang words from you, LOL

    Reply
  730. ladybert62 said on April 27th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    @g:
    Dear G – beautifully stated! I wish we could send it to Ms. Jolie and Mr. Pitt so they could learn something about what they are doing to those children. Also, thank you for sharing your info about the places you have lived! :-)

    Reply
  731. John said on April 27th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    I think that Pitt is trying to spend more time away from Jolie, and I remember hearing that Pitt’s parents liked Aniston, didn’t seem to warm up to Jolie. So, being spotted in Niagara Falls with his parents and sons on the day he was supposed to be with Jolie, is kind of interesting. If he was in NYC or even Albany, a jaunt over to Niagara Falls is about an hour or so by plane from NYC, and Albany is a fair trip by car. Kind of unusual to just up and do that on a Saturday afternoon. Pitt must be very bored with his life now, or trying to distance himself from homelife.

    He looks tired, worn, looks to be adding on pounds, stressed and older. Being with Jolie has really changed Pitt. Their brood of kids never look happy, almost as unhappy as Pitt. Those kids don’t understand acting; so they play themselves.

    http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news?id=47020

    I do think that Pitt and Jolie are in for a rough ride, it was a big mistake hiring someone like Brett who is possessive, self serving, unorthodox and unenthical, someone like him is trouble, but that’s the typical kind of decisions Jolie makes. Pitt no doubt is obviously regretting being a part of Jolie’s – group, decisions, even by virtue of associating with Jolie. It’s impacted his life and showing on his face. Brett’s history and background looks rough, and he doesn’t seem like someone who would back down to anyone. If he’s got dirt on Jolie my guess is it’s coming out. Sounds like Pitt didn’t trust Brett’s character.

    See article below:

    ——–

    Batten down, Benjamin Button. It may not be all family bliss and Oscar gold for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

    InTouch magazine has some pretty explosive speculation this week. Apparently, Mickey Brett, a longtime Jolie bodyguard formerly in the employ of Nicole Kidman, is ready to sing like a bird over his tenure with the pair.

    Among the delicious (and potentially litigious) dirt on Brad, 45, and 33-year-old Angie that Brett is pimping out as fact to prospective publishers:

    Angelina used kinky toys and costumes to indulge Brad’s every fantasy on the Mr. & Mrs. Smith set, thus luring him away from Jennifer Aniston.
    Bodyguard Brett and Jolie would often poke fun at 40-year-old Pitt’s general lack of knowledge on many topics.
    Angelina has coordinated affairs while with Brad, including an alleged series of trysts with a female pop star: “Mickey set up at least 20 secret meetings for Angie with this woman at hotels when Brad was working,” a source tells the mag.
    The power couple may not be able to block publication—Brett is said to have been contracted without a confidentiality agreement.

    On the other side of the coin, however, Brett hasn’t the rosiest past. He was once questioned in a murder case, was accused of using intimidation and racial slurs on the set of A Mighty Heart and has been caught on film choking a paparazzi.

    Sounds like a perfect Wrestler follow-up role for Mickey Rourke!

    Fret not for Brad and Angie, though. They know how to play by the rules of fame.

    Quotables /
    “Brett, who was fired last year, will dish “all the sordid details of how they (Pitt and Jolie) got together while Brad was still married to Jennifer Aniston,” claims a snitch.”
    Socialite Life

    http://www.celebuzz.com/fromer-jolie-pitt-bodyguard-shopping-s80461/

    ——

    More on Brett:

    Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt’s chief & beloved bodyguard Mickey Brett is facing legal action in Namibia on charges of assaulting a restaurant owner. The Irish-born hooligan will be summoned before a Namibian court for reportedly beating up Thenus Duvenhage & subsequently damaging his eye.

    Brett has been widely criticized for his heavy-handed approach to bodyguarding & caused controversy while taking care of the Jolie-Pitt family as they were preparing for the birth of their first biological child together in the African country. Duvenhage stated that he was escorted off from an area where the Hollywood couple were present & made an “offending sign” before driving off.

    The Namibian local alleges Brett gave chase after the finger was produced, forcing Duvenhage’s car off the road. He goes on to state that he was kicked & punched by the bodyguard Brett & has serious injury to his eye.

    Duvenhage’s lawyer announced, “Since Brett is a foreign national and about to leave the country, we abandoned the arrest because he deposited a sum of money as security at his lawyer’s office, covering the damages claimed plus legal costs.

    “We now contemplate when to have the summons issued to Brett and the law will take its course.”

    Meanwhile the Jolie-Pitt tribe left Namibia Saturday following their April 5th arrival. In a recent press conference Brad Pit offered, “We are very proud that our daughter was born here, and we leave with fond memories and definitely hungry to return.”

    http://www.celebrific.com/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-bodyguard-mickey-brett-namibia-assault-case/

    More on Brett’s behavior and acts of violence:

    Brad Pitt’s bodyguard is making the paparazzi painfully aware that he does not like the paparazzi trying to get pictures of his clients. Brangelina are in Pune, India as Angie prepares to start shooting “A Mighty Heart.” Photogs, including our own, have been staking out Le Meridian hotel there, trying their damnedest to get a shot of the ellusive couple and their kids. And by the looks of it, it ain’t gonna be easy with thugs like this around.

    This brute was the family’s bodyguard in Paris, just before Shiloh’s birth, and now he’s travelled with the couple to India to take on the paparazzi there.

    Check out the poor photog’s neck injury after the jump …

    http://x17online.com/celebrities/brads_bodyguard_a_bully.php

    Brad Pitt Regrets Leaving Jennifer Aniston For Angelina Jolie?
    The actor is said to still harbour strong feelings for his ex…
    Friday 06th Feb 2009
    …more Angelina Jolie »
    Brad Pitt still holds a candle for ex-wife Jennifer Aniston, according to a new report.

    The Fight Club star – who divorced Jennifer in 2005 – is reportedly missing his former spouse as things become more and more intense with his and current partner Angelina Jolie’s rapidly expanding brood.

    A source tells the National Enquirer, “The way Brad talks about Jen is enough to make his drinking buddies wonder that maybe, after all this time, he wishes he hadn’t broken up with her.

    “You just get the feeling Brad now knows he could always be himself around Jennifer and he can’t with Angelina.”

    The source adds, “I’ll bet he’s secretly lusting after Jen as she turns 40. She’s sexier than ever.

    “Surely he had more than a twinge of jealousy when she got back with John Mayer. Drinking buddies have even teased him about his ex and how she’s dating a young buck!

    “Brad’s in a lonely, emotional place with his woman. But it’s a place he chose and can’t just up and leave – not with those kids!

    “The best he can do is keep finding comfort in booze, but only until Angie tells him no more – or else!”

    I really don’t see Pitt and Jolie staying together much longer. They seem to adopt kids from outside the country for show, at a rate most people could not manage. Then, Jolie has a person emulate her: Octomom, doing what she thinks is being close to Jolie in character, fashion, lifestyle, children and Jolie is appalled. She is mirroring her life.

    Reply
  732. John said on April 27th, 2009 at 8:39 am

    Angelina wanted the kids, but is not looking after them:

    Pitt is being the responsible parent here:

    Brad Pitt Is On Daddy-Duty While Angelina Jolie Gets Physical On Salt: Pictures
    It’s a boys-only bonding weekend for Brad and his adopted sons…
    Monday 27th Apr 2009
    While Angelina Jolie was leaping about on the roof of a lorry on a New York interstate, Brad Pitt was enjoying a rather more laidback day with sons Maddox and Pax.

    On Saturday the actor was spotted grabbing a coffee near the family’s rented home on Long Island with his two oldest boys in tow.

    On Sunday, Brad and the boys stepped up the pace with a sight-seeing trip to Niagara Falls.

    The trio – along with Brad’s parents Bill and Jane Pitt – explored the famous falls from aboard the Maid of the Mist boat, snapping photos from the upper deck while dressed in plastic ponchos to protect them from the spray.

    http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/48192/brad-pitt-is-on-daddyduty-while-angelina-jolie-gets-physical-on-salt-pictures

    _____________________

    Brad Pitt blocks bodyguard book
    Monday, 27 April 2009

    Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have stopped their former bodyguard releasing a tell-all book.

    The couple – who have been dating for four years and raise six children together – hired top US and UK lawyers to prevent Mickey Brett revealing details of their private lives in a novel and TV show.

    Click here for the latest pics of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie >

    The book proposal would have been based around Brett’s first-person account of his years protecting a number of Hollywood stars, including Sandra Bullock, Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, Sylvester Stallone and Richard Gere, according to the New York Daily News newspaper.

    Marty Singer, Brad and Angelina’s US litigator, says Brett was bound by a confidentiality agreement and is legally not allowed to comment.

    He also claimed Brett is a “pathological liar” and revealed he has been convicted of 11 different crimes.

    Brett has denied trying to sell stories.

    He claims he had not given the project the all-clear, and says most of the tales were created by his ghost writer Robin McGibbon.

    Brett’s lawyers said: “Our client disputes what has apparently been said by Mr. Singer, but is not in a position to comment further at this stage.”

    However, McGibbon insists the bodyguard is lying.

    He explained: “Mickey was definitely going to consider a book or TV deal if the offer was good enough. But at this point, there’s not going to be any book.”

    http://www.myparkmag.co.uk/articles/celebrity/brad-pitt-blocks-bodyguard-book.html

    Reply
  733. John said on April 27th, 2009 at 8:45 am

    No Jolie – family fun outing

    April 27, 2009
    Brad & the Boys Hit Niagara Falls

    (Fame Pictures)
    Superstar Brad Pitt might have traveled the world and seen the most exotic places that only a lucky few are privileged enough to experience, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t enjoy the same magnificent sites that everyone else does.

    Over the weekend, Brad took sons Maddox and Pax — along with his parents Bill and Jane — for a day trip to Niagara Falls. And though the A-list actor did his best to go undetected (kind of hard to do when you travel with bodyguards), several tourists and locals certainly got more than they bargained for when they spotted him in his blue rain poncho.

    “He was looking good,” local 17-year-old Melissa Harris, told the Buffalo News

    According to the paper, even though Brad and his family received VIP treatment, they begaved the same as most tourists — snapping pics of each other and the local scenery and, of course, getting soaked by the falls.

    Not on hand was Angelina Jolie, who was all the way across the Empire State, filming her upcoming movie, Salt, in Albany.

    http://www.okmagazine.com/news/view/13737

    Reply
  734. CC said on April 27th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Where is the JA scoop???? Is it too early in LA?? I’m on the East coast…waiting….anticipating….dying to know what the dealio is….

    Reply
  735. John said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:03 am

    Jolie has a copycat wannabe in Suleman. She is mimicking Jolie: Jolie is offended by Suleman because of the bizarre things she does, and because she holds her as some role model and copies Jolie.

    First it was all the babies, her bizarre behavior, sunglasses, her questionable background, now tattoos.

    Suleman played up her resemblance to Angelina Julie, using the stage name “Angelina”. In Touch reports that Octomom was a stripper for a full year in her early 20’s. They were tipped off by a stripper named Sage, who worked with Suleman doing private parties.

    So if the reality TV thing doesn’t work for Octomom I suppose she still has that to fall back on, assuming she can get rid of the stretch marks popping out eight kids would produce.

    Nadya Suleman’s Obsession with Angelina Jolie: Now Getting Tattoos
    nadia suleman , Nadya Suleman , tattoos
    April 27th, 2009

    Just like Angelina Jolie, Nadya Suleman is a fan of tattoos.

    And, now Nadya Suleman has paid tribute to her children with just that – a tattoo. According to RadarOnline.com, Nadya already has seven tattoos that are not easily visible (thankfully!)

    What does it look like?

    Apparently, Nadya wanted another tattoo to celebrate her new babies — and this time she gets it in a highly visible place, and it’s not small! It’s an an angel tattoo surrounded by fourteen stars, one for each child.

    http://coverawards.com/2009/04/27/news_nadia_suleman_tattoos_pictures_3197/

    Reply
  736. Keane said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:08 am

    Ok guys, lots has been said here and lots to catch up on so I can’t go into it in too much detail, it will suffice just to say a few things. Kate and I have been the main contributors to this blog from its early days, there have been people posting here before us but they did not comment as regularly. For a very long time it was really just me and Kate, a few genuine posters who were ripping into Ian and claiming intellectual superiority when they were actually very ignorant and a load of Angie’s fakes. Before all you guys came on board, all Kate and I were really doing was tackling these posters and trying to make sure people weren’t dissuaded from reading Ian’s stories, which we feel is important. Now, thankfully, many more genuine people are reading and commenting who aren’t here to disrupt things or to protect St Angelina from the truth about her being told. There are however, still an influx of her people trying to discredit or deflect attention from Ian’s stories on a daily basis by any means they can think of. This is not always apparent to posters who have not been here from the early days and all I’m trying to do by pointing them out is to make sure no-one gives them any credence and they don’t achieve the obective they desire. Angelina has to learn that she does not control the world or the media and she won’t get her own way by fair means or foul. Because of the predominance of these people on this blog so far I occasionally mistake a genuine poster such as Togi or karenab for one of them. I am not 100% foolproof I admit. But as is the case with both of you, as long as you stick around you can tell pretty quickly whether you are genuine or not. Any nasty comments I may have made towards you karenab I can assure you was because I thought you were just another one of the bastards who have been baiting Kate and I all along and who hacked in to m e-mail and posted under my full real name on this blog (a crime). I would never speak to a genuine poster who is here to be constructive and not disrupt the blog and attack Ian in that way. So as I previously said I apologise for that and please don’t feel it was a personal attack on you, it was simply a case of mistaken identity. If you knew how incessantly we’ve been attacked on this blog you would understand how sick of it we are by now and why I couldn’t even be bothered to discuss it any more, it takes up so much time in my day. But this I guess is what the trolls want as they want Kate and I to come across as paranoid or like we have a superiority complex or are nasty to newcomers or whatever (which I can assure you is not the case at all) and to ultimately discredit us, make people dislike us and stop us from posting. That’s what Togi (I think it was) meant by saying the trolls are all high-fiving themselves now meant, not you karenab.

    So in the future it would probably be helpful if anyone has an issue with Kate and I to take it up directly with us rather than talking about it amongst yourselves. I can handle direct attacks and questioning, but when a load of people start bad-mouthing me to each other (in the style of Billi in particular who misinerpreted everything I said and is convinced I’m on Ian’s payroll, which I hasten to point out I’m not), then its the fastest way to make me angry, lose my respect and make me not want to post on this blog. I can handle criticsim and challenges believe you me, but I cannot handle a load of people chattign shit about me to each other in a totally unfair way. So anyway, Togi, Alif, Canuck etc thanks for your support. Everyone else I hope we can all be friends. And please forgive us if it takes us a while to trust new posters, there have been so many fakes it takes us a while to make sure people are genuine. Please don’t let that put you off or make you feel intimidated. The only people I wish to intimidate are the idiots who think they can control what the world thinks about Angelina Jolie. Oh and BTW karenab, re: those posts of Sugar Ray’s you thought were fakes, that is debatable. There my have been a reason Ian posted that after SR’s comments, you have to read between the lines. There are a lot of different pressures on them at once so a lot of what they say has to be coded. As I said before, stuff that goes on on this blog is nowhere near as straightforward as people think. Nothing is cut and dried. And yes we all need to be Hercule Poirrot to figure it out most of the time but its fun so I’m sticking with it. All the best to everyone.

    Reply
  737. Keane said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:10 am

    Oh dear, just throw a paragraph in there anywhere you desire, I was writing it too quickly to structure it properly, paragraphs are not the greatest of friends to me!

    Reply
  738. John said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:11 am

    Any news on JA today???

    Reply
  739. CC said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    @John:
    To be fair…he didn’t say WHEN on Monday it would be posted just THAT it would be posted on Monday….but I’m FLIPPIN dyin’ over here!!!

    We want the scoop….we want the scoop….we want the scoop…EVERYONE together now…We want the scoop! ;-)

    Reply
  740. ladybert62 said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:21 am

    @Keane:
    Hi Keane, I am delighted to see you – long post and all! :-)

    Reply
  741. ladybert62 said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:24 am

    @John:
    Oh my – I am going to have to try and read more on this one – Ms. Suleman is repulsive in all ways that I can think of – once again, children to suffer for the selfish problems of a parent. Thanks for the info.

    Reply
  742. anna said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:34 am

    @Keane:
    okeedokey. back to your post on the endowed and misty. since sugar did not capitalize misty I do not think it is referring to a person. It seems like a state of being. Someone is endowed and misty. I kind of like Kate’s ( maybe someone else’s too ) about JA is possibly pregnant! I bet that is the news. Is it Brad’s?

    Reply
  743. Tamara said on April 27th, 2009 at 9:51 am

    Good Morning Everyone! Looking for the JA post! hahaha Oh Dear, I wasn’t able to read them all in detail but it appears there was a bit of strife on the board yesterday, but it seems to have ended now so Im glad. Forgive me if Im being redundant, but Im wondering two things:

    Is JM supposed to be John Mayer? and…
    Could Misty be a reference to Brads trip to Niagra Falls? Forgive me if you’ve already dissected this in detail.

    Reply
  744. anna said on April 27th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    @Tamara:
    yes JM seems to be John Mayer and i think the misty refers to a state of being. like i posted.

    Reply
  745. Tamara said on April 27th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @anna:Ah Okay! Trying to catch up, almost impossible! hahaha

    Reply
  746. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 27th, 2009 at 10:06 am

    @Keane:
    Hey Keane!! I left Kate a message on the Toronto thread, but I’m not sure she got it. Can you read it when you get a chance? I just want to know what you think.

    Btw, you’ve always been cool in my book. I followed you here from Dlisted to see what this site had to offer… haven’t left since.

    Reply
  747. karenab said on April 27th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    @Keane:
    Cool – thanks Keane. The LAST thing I would want is to upset ANYONE. My post this a.m – I thought it was only a few lines as I typed but when it went up it was like War and Peace :)

    Reply
  748. Kate said on April 27th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @Keane:
    re: those posts of Sugar Ray’s you thought were fakes, that is debatable. There my have been a reason Ian posted that after SR’s comments, you have to read between the lines. There are a lot of different pressures on them at once so a lot of what they say has to be coded. As I said before, stuff that goes on on this blog is nowhere near as straightforward as people think. Nothing is cut and dried. And yes we all need to be Hercule Poirrot to figure it out most of the time but its fun so I’m sticking with it. All the best to everyone.

    LOL, so we are on the same page as always my friend.

    Reply
  749. Keane said on April 27th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    @ karenab – that’s cool don’t worry, it was a misunderstanding all round, we all jumped down each other’s throats unnecessarily. I just get a bit sick of the daily bashing of Kate and myself (literally a day does not go by when either one of us is not slated) and have more than my fair share of things on my mind at the moment (let’s all blame the economy, seems like its the main culprit). But let’s just start afresh and move on.

    @ AFM – oh cool that’s good to hear, what was your name on there if you don’t mind me asking, as I’m sure I’ll remember you (you don’t have to if you don’t want to – I understand if you want to keep a low profile – God the paranoia!!!).

    @ Kate – oh yeah I got exactly what you meant and it occurred to me too. The comments just fit quite well, didn’t sound like fakes so considering what has been going on behind the scenes, I could see the necessity for the subterfuge. That’s why when people say fakes or non-fakes are glaringly obvious I’m like no they’re not at all, I can barely keep up with it and people are getting it wrong all the time! Was so irritated by that suggestion, yes I just think everyone else is too stupid to see it, no I don’t, I can barely keep up with it myself! Anyway, let’s let that one lie now!

    Reply
  750. Togi said on April 27th, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    @Kate:
    ;-)

    Reply
  751. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    @Keane:
    Hey Keane, Thanks for the post! I wasn’t around and haven’t read through to see what happened…but after reading this post I understand what happened, I think. Sounds mighty uncomfortable…and I’d be upset if I were ganged up on (no disrespect to anyone…just saying). It really helps me understand, in general, about the loons, liars, attackers (and how sick of it you guys must be) ..etc, too. So thank you for the explanation and thanks for being here.

    Reply
  752. Z said on April 27th, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    @g:
    Well look at that! It even has a principle named after it. : )

    Reply
  753. bettieboop said on April 28th, 2009 at 11:17 am

    http://www.anorak.co.uk/celebrities/208649.html

    Reply
  754. Inquiring Minds said on April 28th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    illegitimate kitty litter-the bio kid born before they were married is not Brads, Shiloh………….

    Just throwing this out there. Angie was hanging around Clinton way back. All of a sudden she becomes interested in charity, and becomes UN Ambassador. Then comes the nomination for the CFR. ( who nominated her?) This is a chick with a high-school education. Shiloh could be the Ex- presidents imo.

    Just another tidbit, Brad starts up with MIR in New Orleans. Guess who is involved with that as well. Mr WJC & his good friend Steven Bing.

    Perhaps this is the reason she is so well insulated. Also it was very curious for ST. Johns to hire her as they cater to conservative women, which is something jolie is not known for.
    I think brad is as gay as they come, jolie is bi, and their whole relationship is one big cover-up.
    Of course, just my humble opinion. Google clinton & angelina jolie.

    Reply
  755. addelalorse said on November 4th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    How are you guys doing

    Flash Games Online at DeoGames.com
    [url=http://www.deogames.com]Flash Games Online[/url]

    Reply
  756. viagra said on February 9th, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis online , buy cialis , buy viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  757. viagra said on February 10th, 2010 at 12:07 am

    Hello!
    viagra , phentermine , cialis , xanax , cialis ,

    Reply
  758. tramadol said on March 1st, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    Hello!
    tramadol , tramadol , cialis , phentermine , cialis ,

    Reply
  759. tramadol said on March 1st, 2010 at 11:41 pm

    Hello!
    tramadol , viagra , phentermine , phentermine , phentermine ,

    Reply
  760. viagra said on March 1st, 2010 at 11:49 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , tramadol , tramadol , xanax , xanax ,

    Reply
  761. viagra said on March 2nd, 2010 at 12:51 am

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  762. viagra said on March 2nd, 2010 at 5:38 am

    Hello!
    viagra , xanax , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  763. tramadol said on March 2nd, 2010 at 6:44 am

    Hello!
    tramadol ,

    Reply
  764. viagra said on March 2nd, 2010 at 6:45 am

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  765. viagra said on March 2nd, 2010 at 11:42 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , phentermine , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  766. tramadol said on March 2nd, 2010 at 12:50 pm

    Hello!
    tramadol ,

    Reply
  767. viagra said on March 2nd, 2010 at 6:51 pm

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  768. tramadol said on March 2nd, 2010 at 6:51 pm

    Hello!
    tramadol ,

    Reply
  769. viagra said on March 2nd, 2010 at 11:43 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , xanax , viagra , xanax ,

    Reply
  770. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 12:00 am

    Hello!
    viagra , xanax , xanax , phentermine , tramadol ,

    Reply
  771. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 2:56 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , viagra , viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  772. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 3:08 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cheap cialis , viargra , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  773. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 3:20 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cheap cialis , viagra , viagra , viagra ,

    Reply
  774. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 3:31 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cheap cialis , viargra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  775. cialis said on March 3rd, 2010 at 3:44 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , viagra , viagra , viagra ,

    Reply
  776. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 3:55 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cialis , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  777. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 4:43 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cheap viagra , viagra , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  778. tramadol said on March 3rd, 2010 at 5:42 am

    Hello!
    tramadol , tramadol , phentermine , tramadol , xanax ,

    Reply
  779. tramadol said on March 3rd, 2010 at 5:59 am

    Hello!
    tramadol , tramadol , phentermine , xanax , viagra ,

    Reply
  780. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 6:02 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra online , cheap cialis , cialis online , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  781. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 6:17 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis online , viargra , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  782. cialis said on March 3rd, 2010 at 6:44 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis online , viagra , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  783. generic_viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 10:58 am

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cialis online , cialis , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  784. cialis said on March 3rd, 2010 at 11:29 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  785. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viargra , cialis , buy viagra , viagra ,

    Reply
  786. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cheap cialis , cialis , viargra ,

    Reply
  787. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  788. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    Hello!
    viagra ,

    Reply
  789. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viargra , cialis , cheap cialis , cialis online ,

    Reply
  790. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 4:34 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , buy cialis , viagra , viargra , cialis online ,

    Reply
  791. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , buy viagra , cialis online , buy cialis , viargra ,

    Reply
  792. generic_viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cialis online , cialis online , viargra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  793. cialis said on March 3rd, 2010 at 6:29 pm

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  794. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 8:44 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cialis online , viargra , viargra ,

    Reply
  795. cialis said on March 3rd, 2010 at 8:58 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , viagra online , viargra , cialis online ,

    Reply
  796. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis online , viagra online , cialis , cialis online ,

    Reply
  797. cialis said on March 3rd, 2010 at 10:25 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , viagra , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  798. viagra said on March 3rd, 2010 at 10:53 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , discount viagra , buy cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  799. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 2:42 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis online , viargra , discount viagra , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  800. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 2:57 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis online , cialis online , cheap cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  801. viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 3:12 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viargra , cialis online , viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  802. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 3:27 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , viargra , cialis , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  803. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 4:27 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viargra , buy cialis , viagra , cialis online ,

    Reply
  804. viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 4:56 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis online , cialis , viagra , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  805. viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 5:25 am

    Hello!
    viagra , ivagra , buy viagra , cilais , cialis online ,

    Reply
  806. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 10:14 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , buy viagra , viagra , vigara ,

    Reply
  807. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 10:46 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cialis , cialis , viargra ,

    Reply
  808. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 11:54 am

    Hello!
    cialis , icalis , viargra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  809. discount_viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 3:55 pm

    Hello!
    discount viagra , cialsi , cialis , cialis online , cialis online ,

    Reply
  810. discount_viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    Hello!
    discount viagra , viagra , icalis , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  811. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , buy cialis , viagra , vigara ,

    Reply
  812. viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , buy cialis , ciails , cialis , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  813. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , discount viagra , viagra , viargra ,

    Reply
  814. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , vaigra , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  815. cialis said on March 4th, 2010 at 9:41 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis online , cialis , ciails , viarga ,

    Reply
  816. viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 10:10 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cialis , viagra online , cialis ,

    Reply
  817. generic_viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 10:40 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cialis online , buy cialis , buy viagra , vigara ,

    Reply
  818. viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , viagra online , viagra online , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  819. viagra said on March 4th, 2010 at 11:39 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cheap cialis , cialis online , icalis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  820. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 3:04 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra , cialis , ivagra ,

    Reply
  821. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 4:49 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , viagra online ,

    Reply
  822. generic_viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 5:17 am

    Hello!
    generic viagra , viargra , cialis , cialis , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  823. generic_viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 5:31 am

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cailis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  824. generic_viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 5:59 am

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cialis , lowest prices viagra , cheap cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  825. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 9:49 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cialis , cialis , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  826. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 10:06 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , buy viagra , vaigra , cialis ,

    Reply
  827. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 10:36 am

    Hello!
    viagra , generic viagra , cialsi , buy viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  828. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 10:50 am

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , cheap cialis , viagra online , ivagra ,

    Reply
  829. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 11:35 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cialsi , generic viagra , cheap viagra , viagra online ,

    Reply
  830. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 11:50 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis online , cialis , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  831. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  832. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap viagra , cialis , generic viagra , ciails ,

    Reply
  833. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 3:17 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , viagra online , generic viagra , vigara ,

    Reply
  834. generic_viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra , vigara , buy viagra , cialis online , cialis online ,

    Reply
  835. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , cialis , viagra ,

    Reply
  836. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , viargra , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  837. discount_viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    Hello!
    discount viagra , cialis , cialis , viagra online , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  838. generic_viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  839. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , viargra , buy viagra , cialis online ,

    Reply
  840. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra , cialis , cialsi , viargra ,

    Reply
  841. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 9:11 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra , cialis , cheap viagra , icalis ,

    Reply
  842. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 9:25 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap viagra , cheap cialis , buy viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  843. buy_cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 9:40 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis , viagra , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  844. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , viagar , cheap cialis , buy viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  845. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 10:08 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , buy cialis , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  846. cheap_cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 10:22 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , viagra , ivagra , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  847. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 10:36 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cialis , viargra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  848. buy_cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 11:04 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cialis online , cialis , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  849. viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , vaigra , cheap cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  850. cialis said on March 5th, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , icalis , viagra , vigara ,

    Reply
  851. discount_viagra said on March 5th, 2010 at 11:58 pm

    Hello!
    discount viagra , cialis online , cialsi , viagar , cialis ,

    Reply
  852. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 12:31 am

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  853. generic_viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 3:03 am

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cialis , cheap cialis , buy viagra , viargra ,

    Reply
  854. generic_viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 3:46 am

    Hello!
    generic viagra , viagra , cialis , cheap cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  855. cheap_cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 4:00 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , generic viagra , viargra , viagra online ,

    Reply
  856. viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 4:15 am

    Hello!
    viagra , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , cialis , buy viagra ,

    Reply
  857. cheap_cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 4:28 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , icalis , viagra , discount viagra , vaigra ,

    Reply
  858. generic_viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 4:43 am

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cialis , viagra , discount generic cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  859. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 5:11 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagar , ciails , cialis , online viagra ,

    Reply
  860. viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 5:25 am

    Hello!
    viagra , viagra online , ivagra , cialis , viagra online ,

    Reply
  861. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 9:04 am

    Hello!
    cialis , icalis , cialis , viagra cialis levitra , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  862. viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 9:34 am

    Hello!
    order viagra online , order viagra online , canadian cialis , cialis , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  863. viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 9:49 am

    Hello!
    viagra , buy viagra , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  864. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 10:32 am

    Hello!
    cialis , discount viagra , cialis drug impotence , cheap generic viagra , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  865. cheap_cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 11:16 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , cheap viagra , cialis , online viagra ,

    Reply
  866. discount_viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 11:57 am

    Hello!
    discount viagra , buy viagra online , cialis , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  867. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis generic ,

    Reply
  868. viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , cialis , cialis impotence drug eli lilly co , lowest prices viagra , viagra online ,

    Reply
  869. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , vaigra , buy cialis , cialis , buy viagra online ,

    Reply
  870. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra online , generic viagra , viagra online , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  871. ciails said on March 6th, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    Hello!
    ciails , cialis , generic viagra online , discount viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  872. buy_cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis , cheap viagra , cialis experience , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  873. generic_viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra , discount viagra , cialis , cialis , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  874. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 5:21 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , lowest prices viagra , cialis , cialis , cilais ,

    Reply
  875. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , generic viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  876. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 6:00 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , best price viagra , discount viagra , no prescription cialis , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  877. cheap_cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 6:32 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  878. cheap_cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 8:59 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , viagra , order viagra , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  879. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , ciails , cialis , viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  880. cheap_cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 9:26 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , buy cialis , cheap generic cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  881. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , best price viagra , viagra sale ,

    Reply
  882. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 10:21 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis vs levitra , viagra alternative , cialsi , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  883. generic_viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra , cheap cialis , natural viagra , generic viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  884. viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 11:01 pm

    Hello!
    purchase viagra online , cilais , viagra online , cialis information , cialis online ,

    Reply
  885. viagra said on March 6th, 2010 at 11:15 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , generic viagra , discount viagra , viagra online , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  886. cialis said on March 6th, 2010 at 11:28 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra online , cheap cialis , viagra online , free viagra samples ,

    Reply
  887. cheap_cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 12:28 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  888. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 2:44 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , icalis , cheap cialis , online viagra ,

    Reply
  889. ciails said on March 7th, 2010 at 2:58 am

    Hello!
    ciails , viagra , cialis , cialis online , cialis ,

    Reply
  890. viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 3:13 am

    Hello!
    order viagra online , cialis , viagra online , vigara , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  891. viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 3:27 am

    Hello!
    free viagra samples , buy cialis , cailis , cheap generic cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  892. discount_viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 3:41 am

    Hello!
    discount viagra , cheap cialis , cialis , ciails , viagra pill ,

    Reply
  893. discount_viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 3:55 am

    Hello!
    discount viagra , cialis , discount viagra , cheap cialis , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  894. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 4:38 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy viagra , cheap viagra , cheap cialis , cilais ,

    Reply
  895. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 5:07 am

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , purchase viagra , discount viagra , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  896. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 5:21 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , free viagra samples , cialis , natural viagra ,

    Reply
  897. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 5:36 am

    Hello!
    cialis , discount viagra , cialis versus viagra , cheap viagra , viagra online ,

    Reply
  898. discount_viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 6:22 am

    Hello!
    discount viagra ,

    Reply
  899. viagra_alternatives said on March 7th, 2010 at 6:23 am

    Hello!
    viagra alternatives ,

    Reply
  900. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 8:48 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra substitutes , cheap viagra , cialis , vigara ,

    Reply
  901. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 9:19 am

    Hello!
    cialis , best price viagra , cialis , discount viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  902. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:02 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra online , cialis testimonials , cialis , vaigra ,

    Reply
  903. viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:16 am

    Hello!
    viagra , ciails , buy viagra , buy cialis , buy viagra ,

    Reply
  904. cheap_cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:30 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , generic viagra , order cialis , cialis , viagra alternative ,

    Reply
  905. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra online , cialsi , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  906. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:58 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , viagra online , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  907. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 11:13 am

    Hello!
    cialis , ciails , cheap cialis , buy cialis , lowest prices viagra ,

    Reply
  908. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 11:26 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy viagra online , cialis , cheap cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  909. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    Hello!
    cialis ,

    Reply
  910. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis , ivagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  911. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 2:57 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cilais , viagra online , generic viagra , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  912. viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 3:11 pm

    Hello!
    cheap viagra uk , cheap viagra , cialis , best price viagra , vigara ,

    Reply
  913. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 3:54 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , buy viagra , buy cialis , vigara , discount viagra ,

    Reply
  914. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , viarga , viagra alternatives ,

    Reply
  915. generic_viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra , vigara , cialis , generic viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  916. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , generic viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  917. cheap_cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 5:31 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , viagar , cialis , cialis , buy viagra ,

    Reply
  918. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cialis on line , buy viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  919. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 8:43 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , discount viagra , cialis , cheap viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  920. viagra said on March 7th, 2010 at 8:58 pm

    Hello!
    viagra , buy cialis , cialis , cialis , buy viagra ,

    Reply
  921. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , discount viagra , cialis , purchase viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  922. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 9:26 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , discount viagra , buy canada cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  923. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 9:41 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap viagra , herbal viagra , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  924. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , herbal viagra , icalis , cialis drug impotence ,

    Reply
  925. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:29 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis soft tabst tabs , cialis , ciails , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  926. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 10:46 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  927. ciails said on March 7th, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    Hello!
    ciails , buy cialis , viagar , cheap cialis , purchase viagra ,

    Reply
  928. cheap_cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , ciails , generic viagra , buy viagra , cialis information ,

    Reply
  929. cheap_cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 11:44 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , cialis , vigara , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  930. cialis said on March 7th, 2010 at 11:59 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra online , cheap generic viagra , cialis , cialsi ,

    Reply
  931. buy_cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 12:32 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis ,

    Reply
  932. cheap_cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 2:50 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , viarga , cialis , cialis , cialsi ,

    Reply
  933. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 4:34 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , discount viagra , viagra online , cheap generic viagra ,

    Reply
  934. viagra_alternatives said on March 8th, 2010 at 4:49 am

    Hello!
    viagra alternatives , cialis , cheap viagra , cheap cialis , female viagra ,

    Reply
  935. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 5:18 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , buy viagra , cialis , viagra online ,

    Reply
  936. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 5:32 am

    Hello!
    cialis , viagra online , buy viagra online , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  937. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 5:46 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap cialis , cheap viagra , vaigra , buy viagra ,

    Reply
  938. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 5:59 am

    Hello!
    cialis , discount viagra , cheap generic viagra substitutes , generic viagra , viagar ,

    Reply
  939. cheap_cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 6:35 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  940. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 9:58 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , buy viagra , cialis generic , free viagra samples ,

    Reply
  941. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 10:42 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra online , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  942. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 10:55 am

    Hello!
    cialis , buy cialis , cheap viagra , cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  943. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 11:52 am

    Hello!
    cialis , cialis , viagra side effects , discount viagra , canada cialis ,

    Reply
  944. viagra said on March 8th, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    Hello!
    generic viagra online , viagra online , cheap viagra , buy cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  945. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , buy viagra , buy cialis , order viagra ,

    Reply
  946. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 5:17 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , discount viagra , cheap cialis generic , cialis , viagra uk ,

    Reply
  947. cheap_cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , best price viagra , natural viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  948. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 5:58 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap viagra , cheap cialis , cialis uk , cheap viagra uk ,

    Reply
  949. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 8:48 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , natural viagra , generic viagra , cialis , cialis drug prescription ,

    Reply
  950. cheap_viagra said on March 8th, 2010 at 9:03 pm

    Hello!
    cheap viagra , order viagra online , cheap viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  951. cheap_cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 9:18 pm

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis , viagra online , cialis , viagra uk ,

    Reply
  952. cheap_viagra said on March 8th, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    Hello!
    cheap viagra , cialis , viagra online , buy cialis , buy cialis soft tabst tabs ,

    Reply
  953. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , natural viagra , cialis , cialis , cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  954. purchase_cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 10:17 pm

    Hello!
    purchase cialis , viagra online , cialis , cialis , viagra online ,

    Reply
  955. free said on March 8th, 2010 at 10:31 pm

    Hello!
    cialis free sample , viagra online , viagra uk , cialis , cheap cialis ,

    Reply
  956. viagra_pill said on March 8th, 2010 at 10:46 pm

    Hello!
    viagra pill , cialis pill , buy viagra , cialis , lowest prices viagra ,

    Reply
  957. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , cheap viagra , viagra uk , discount viagra , cialis ,

    Reply
  958. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , discount viagra , generic viagra , viagra online , cialis vs viagra ,

    Reply
  959. buy_viagra said on March 8th, 2010 at 11:30 pm

    Hello!
    buy viagra , cialis , order viagra , cialis , cialis ,

    Reply
  960. cialis said on March 8th, 2010 at 11:58 pm

    Hello!
    cialis , generic viagra , cialis drug prescription , free viagra samples , viagra online ,

    Reply
  961. cheap_viagra said on March 9th, 2010 at 12:32 am

    Hello!
    cheap viagra ,

    Reply
  962. buy_cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 2:58 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , online cialis , buy cialis generic , cheap generic viagra , female viagra ,

    Reply
  963. buy_cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 3:14 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , liquid cialis , buy cialis , viagra alternative , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  964. buy_cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 4:15 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , online cialis , buy viagra online , cialis reviews , generic viagra ,

    Reply
  965. cheap_cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 6:00 am

    Hello!
    cheap cialis , cialis in the uk , order viagra , cialis pill , purchase viagra online ,

    Reply
  966. buy_cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 10:18 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , female viagra , cialis drug , cialis tablet , cialis generic ,

    Reply
  967. buy_cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 10:34 am

    Hello!
    buy cialis , cialis vs viagra , free viagra , buy cialis generic , cialis on line ,

    Reply
  968. cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    Hello!
    buy cialis soft tabst tabs , buy cialis in the uk , cheap viagra , buy cialis , buy cialis ,

    Reply
  969. natural_viagra said on March 9th, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    Hello!
    natural viagra , cialis dosage , cialis , natural viagra , cialis eli lilly ,

    Reply
  970. viagra said on March 9th, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    Hello!
    purchase viagra online , buy cialis , cheap viagra , cialis forum , cialis viagra ,

    Reply
  971. cialis said on March 9th, 2010 at 4:28 pm