IUC Exclusive: Brangie Limo Driver (Part III) – Order To Go

Posted on April 17th, 2009 by HisHighness in IUC:Entertainment, IUC:Exclusive

The man who drove Brangie around New York for weeks has revealed to IUC that he was asked to make several stops in a seedy part of Harlem.  He said Angelina requested he drive a close friend of hers to pick up packages.  “I have no idea what was in them but it was all highly suspicious,” the limo driver told IUC.  “I think Angie is possessed by foolishness. Nobody in their right mind would pull up in a limo where she sent me.  I was scared.”  Developing…

(Note:  Ms. Ninecent filed this post for Ian)

  1. caea said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:16 am

    Hey Ian! I bet those packages contained Sugar Gay`s drug rations! Bwahahah. Really as if the molestation of his poor dog isn`t enough for Sugar Gay now he is dealing with drugs! Who would have thought!

    Reply
  2. rotorua said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:42 am

    Ian, I really enjoy your blog. Finally someone is giving something other than the sanitised, rose coloured view of things. But Ian (or should i say Miss Nine Cent.) Not to be tetchy, but, some of us know how to set up a blog and have multiple people enabled to post as contributors. Why do you do all the posting as HH…and now you say you’ve gone into hiding ( although you could easily post an entry from anywhere) and even though HH has posted this entry, it’s supposedly from Miss Nine Cent. Why would you trust your login to somebody else, rather than just allow them to contribute, passing it on from you so to speak. If you get my blog admin drift. Love IUC anyway. Just sayin…

    Reply
  3. rotorua said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:14 am

    Oh, and I’m desperate to hear more from Me. What does she think about these Harlem shenanigans. Come back, Me!!!!

    Reply
  4. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:15 am

    When you give 8 million to charity it buys a lot of “looking the other way”. When you are a UN goodwill ambassador, although you do not have diplomatic immunity, again, there is a lot of forgiveness for your piccadillos. When you are buying packages in Harlem and your friend Bill Clinton (no stranger to drugs, sex, STD’s) has an office there…..When BP announces at the Clinton Global Initiative that he is creating a charitable organizaiton in NOLA you can assume that the JP’s have access to BC. When the organization you are an ambassador for has a published population control agenda you have to ask yourself what is population control in developing nations? Is it birth control? Forced sterilizations (to prevent, say, the AIDS epidemic and more AIDS orphans?) I will now leave this meme and move on however, FOLLOW THE MONEY.

    Reply
  5. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:19 am

    Harlem, packages= Heroin??

    Reply
  6. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:26 am

    @caea:
    Are you stating facts, an opinion, or making up vicious rumers cos’ you don’t like Ian?
    I am open minded, what’s your beef with this blog, and Ian?

    Reply
  7. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:27 am

    @Mama San:
    Harlem, packages=something pretty suspicious, for sure!

    Possibly Heroin…but definitely sketchy…

    Reply
  8. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:29 am

    @CC:
    I’m from New York, and there are places in Harlem , I won’t even go to, I can only imagine what she was doing there.

    Reply
  9. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:31 am

    @caea:
    “Really as if the molestation of his poor dog isn`t enough for Sugar Gay now he is dealing with drugs! Who would have thought!”

    Only you would have that thought, dear.

    Reply
  10. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:35 am

    Just to put it out there, it was not me who posted under “mama” , yesterday, I saw that whoever it was , was nasty to Kate. I hope we don’t have that again today, anyway Good morning all.

    Reply
  11. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:36 am

    @Mama San:
    Hi ya Mamma! ;-)

    Reply
  12. Billi said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:36 am

    For those that think Me was legit, here’s a recap of his/her posts yesterday. Still say if AJ is as bad as Me implies (horrible, heinous acts) then why no action on the part of ME or others to get her away from the kids (i.e. if AJ would hurt someone so bad who’s to say she wouldn’t try to do same to the kids especially if drugs are involved).
    ********************************************************************************************************
    Just found this site yesterday. First hand knowledge of the situation. Ian’s right, they’re finished. They’re not ready to announce it yet, trying to work out details before the media storm begins. Angie (it’s so hard for me to type her name – I can only bring myself to call her psycho hose beast) is more diabolical, more evil, more manipulative than anyone could possibly imagine. She has great lawyers, and pays them alot of money, they’re very reactive because they have to be. With what she has done, anyone else would be in jail. If people knew the truth, she would be ruined. It makes me sick how people think she’s a do-gooder. She’s a horrible human being. She’s a master manipulator of everything and everyone and works with the UN to wipe her conscience for the horrible, heinous things she does in every day life.

    Psycho hose beast knows who I am. And I’m sure she’s here reading the posts. So, I’ll say this once: if she makes Brad look bad, or if she causes him any more pain, I will go public with what she has done, and she will be publicly humiliated.

    Looks like there are two ‘me’s. I’m the first ‘me’, and english is my first language.

    I cannot and will not spill now. I’m keeping it in my arsenal in case I need it, which I very well may. Believe me when I say that she is beyond the worst things that have been said about her. Far far beyond.

    No, I’m not Brad. But I am someone who has his best interests at heart, and he would kill me if he knew I was posting here. All I can say is that someone participated in horrible, heinous acts against someone else and if the crap this person did were to be made public, they would be humiliated. That’s all I’m going to say.

    There are children involved, main concern is for them. I agree and I may need to expose her, which is why I’m keeping my arsenal intact. I can imagine her attorneys reading this, they know who I am and what I have and are probably shaking in their boots. Both. Anyone else who did not have a few million in the bank and a team of lawyers to hide behind would be in jail. Trust me, absolutely heinous stuff.

    oh she is that bad. And worse. If people only knew, it’s just worse than you could ever imagine. It’s inhuman.

    The acts I refer to does not involve her parenting or children. I only meant that there are 6 beautiful, innocent children who need to remain untouched by this breakup. Up until now, they have been and everyone wants to keep it that way. She may have dirt on Brad, which she may be holding against him but I am as clean as a whistle, and she has nothing on me. What is ‘normal anyway’. He wants what’s best for his kids, they’re the first priority.

    Thanks, I’m well protected. And I have an awesome lawyer.

    And one more thing I want to add, Brad if you’re reading this, remember what I said last time we spoke – yes, I am still willing to go to war if you need me to.
    no, I don’t know Holly.

    No, I’m not Jen, but I know her. She is an amazing person, one of the most together people I have ever known.

    Thanks, he’ll be happy to hear that. You’re not the only one to worry. People have watched him over the years get ‘beaten up’ by it. But it’s ok now, he’s transitioned away from her and he’ll be safe now. Nothing that time and a whole bunch of TLC can’t fix. He has friends, and trust me, he’ll be very very happy soon.

    You don’t need to believe anything I am saying. That’s not why I’m here. I know she reads here, and my intention was to let her know that if she hurts him or makes him look bad I will go to war to make sure he comes out unscathed.

    Her entire sense of identity comes from the press, and gossip sites. Posting here packs a bigger wallop.

    I know. And there’s a reason for it. This is for my own self-protection. As long as B knows I’m in and pschohosebeast knows I have a can of whoop ass I’m willing to open, then I’m good.

    I’m not George Clooney. B’s got friends who aren’t actors, people from all walks of life. I’ve known him for over a decade, and I’m not an actor. There’s a time for everything…and everything in its time.

    oh and drug smuggling? NO.

    Reply
  13. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:37 am

    @CC:
    Hi ya sweetie!

    Reply
  14. Billi said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:39 am

    @Billi:
    Let me correct that to: if drug use may be involved.

    Reply
  15. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    @Billi:
    Hey hon, reread what you posted , this person is not revealing anything at all to us, sounds like a poser to me. Thank you for putting that up, it made it easier.

    Reply
  16. Billi said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:47 am

    @Mama San:

    Mornin Mama San and CC. I know Tamara felt bad yesterday and me (a teensy bit) for questioning Me’s credibility since others felt this person was legit and got scared away. Who knows for sure but bottom line is I know AJ is up to some bad shit based on what we’ve been getting from Ian/SR/9C so this Me really didn’t bring much to the table that we didn’t suspect already.

    Darn I have to go and won’t be back till later so have a great day and I’ll catch up when I get back. Cheers.

    Reply
  17. BigApplette said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:50 am

    @Mama San:
    LOL. In my humble opinion, the only thing a rich white woman in a limo in a bad section of Harlem would be doing is getting drugs (the Washington Heights area used to big the big drug selling area to suburban boys. Don’t know if that’s still the case since that neighborhood is gentrifying).

    Reply
  18. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:51 am

    @Mama San:
    Maybe choose an avatar to solidify your sign in name? I’m not computer savvy at all, so anyone’s help with this issue would be great, including HH….It sucks for people to use another’s name and then turn around and be nasty to posters…

    Reply
  19. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:51 am

    @Billi:
    You too, don’t work to hard . Never feel bad about questioning a source, you and Tam did alright. Holla at ya later.

    Reply
  20. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:52 am

    @Mama San:
    Me sounds like a poser to me, too.

    Reply
  21. K2 said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:56 am

    Maybe there’s truth to all of this, here’s the latest:

    April 16, 3:29 PM ·

    Crying on the set of Salt

    Angelina has burst out in tears on the set of the film Salt today. “She arrived on the set at about 7: 30 AM and looked very distraught. They did a scene where she was running after a golden retriever. Suddenly, she just stopped, got down on her knees, and begin to cry uncontrollably,” my source tells me.

    Nobody is completely sure what caused Angelina to cry. But the other day, I had the exclusive scoop on how she was denied an adoption in the Philippines due to her corrupt adoption in Cambodia. Others have speculated that Angelina and Brad are in the process of breaking up.

    I think Angelina just needs a break. She needs to get herself together, take care of her family, and retire for a couple years. What do you guys think?

    Reply
  22. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    Does anyone else wonder if Angelina’s older man (from the previous post) is Clint Eastwood? Something keeps nagging at me about them and I’m just wondering if that’s even a possibility? Wouldn’t surprise me at all given her obvious daddy issues…and his comment about her having THE most gorgeous face on the planet…if I were his wife, I’d be scared shitless!!!! That’s like an open invitation to have Jolie all over his ass!!

    Reply
  23. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:01 am

    @CC:
    Good call, old man does not always mean dad, it could be used as slang for an older boyfriend, hubby, or sugar daddy.

    Reply
  24. caea said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:02 am

    Hey Sugar Gay knows far too much about how to moleste his dog in order not to speak from personal experience. And the fact that he is from Harlem does make his involvement in the drug scene very believeable! Bwahahah see and I didn`t even have to bribe his dog (em Nanny!).

    Reply
  25. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:05 am

    @caea:
    Seriously, are you on drugs yourself?? I truly have no idea what you’re rambling about…

    Reply
  26. sinker said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:09 am

    possibly she was buying some un-”stepped on” smack?

    in defense of Me and “why haven’t you exposed her crimes?” it can be very hard to pin charges or expose someone with the best lawyers money can buy, political friends in high places, friends in law enforcment, and some pretty scary thugs around as well (wasn’t her bodyguard Mickey charged with an attempted murder?) and anyone who has had a custody battle in their own family can appreciate how difficult it can be when trying not to hurt the children.

    Reply
  27. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:09 am

    @caea:
    You know, I was polite and gave you a fair opportunity to air whatever {legitimate} beef that you have with this blog and SR & Ian.
    It’s obvious that you’re just an asshole, and a shit starter ,and I will no longer acknowledge or post to you anymore.

    Reply
  28. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:09 am

    @Mama San:
    Yeah, and they had the flirt fest going at one of their press things for Changeling…of course, that’s the only way she knows how to relate to men is by flirting. But I wonder if Clint is truly a man and wouldn’t be snowed by her or if he’s just a guy who is controlled by his penis like Brad was…

    Reply
  29. caea said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:09 am

    @CC:

    Just read a few threads back then you know!

    Reply
  30. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:11 am

    @Mama San:
    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!! Beautifully said, Mamma San!

    Reply
  31. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:12 am

    @caea:
    Right, that’s my point…we’re on a NEW thread now, dear. Keep up or get off!

    Reply
  32. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:15 am

    @CC:
    LOL, ain’t it apparent ITS getting off on something.

    Reply
  33. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    @BigApplette:
    I agree with ya , that and or getting a a somethin’, somethin’ on the side if ya know what I mean. IMO

    Reply
  34. CC said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    @Mama San:
    I know and IT’S trying my patience! HA HA

    I have to log off, unfort!

    Have a great weekend, and look into the avatar thing. It may help keep someone from using your name!

    “See” you Monday!

    Reply
  35. caea said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:20 am

    @Mama San:

    Quite the opposite. I have posted my arguments. You want to know what my problem with this site and Ian is? How about this: this site contains the lowest form of gossip such as defamation, slander and harrassment far surpassing the british yellow press. And since most people here -well at least you and Keane and Kate- take every word Ian utters as the holy truth I have tried to open your eyes in a different way by showing what defamation really mwans. Got it?

    Reply
  36. Kikumon said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    How is it that Caea is up so early and checking up on this soooooo fast……

    Reply
  37. keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:22 am

    Re: Me – legitimate insiders wldn’t b scared off by skepticism. There was no discernible point 2 her being here. She said nothing specific or concrete at all, just generalizations. The way she sang 1 person’s phrases & lambasted another is also v suspect, truth is usually more complex than that. If she is legit she will b back with some details of who she is & more of a point 2 what she’s saying & kate & I will b able 2 tell whether she’s legit or not v easily. We think not so far, don’t waste time thinking about her. Her point cld b 2 distract people from the post like all angie’s alts were trying 2 do. Stick 2 thinking about Ians stories, that’s what we’re here 4.

    Caea – how pc u r 4 some1 who claims 2 nobly support the disadvantaged by the power of the stapler. Ur clients wld b disgusted with u.

    Reply
  38. Mama San said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:28 am

    @CC:
    Right on hon, you too, it’s a beautiful day in my neighborhood, hope it is in yours. Post at ya Monday.

    @caea:
    Finally, that’s all I was asking of you, was to post something legit without being nasty about it. You still can’t do it can you. Just spouting rhetoric.
    Further more , I don’t take anyone’s word for gospel, period, and if you want me to see things in
    a different light, than try a different approach. “You get more flies with honey, than you do vineager.”
    You’re still a shit starter and an asshole, have a nice day.

    Reply
  39. anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:30 am

    @caea: Enough already! If you want to defend your idol’s honor, you could go and find us some proof that she donated 1/3 of her income and the 20 millions she received for the baby pics as claimed (and take note that donations to her own foundation(s) cannot be classified as charitable donations).

    Reply
  40. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:32 am

    Good morning everyone!! And good day to you justathought… even though I think you were annoyed by me last night over R.Catone. I went back to read the rest of last night’s post. All I could say is that whatever caused you to be annoyed wasn’t intentional. :)

    When I think of seedy Harlem, I think of drugs, guns, and gangs. Now, we all know that AJ loves weapons etc. Not sure why she would need to go to Harlem to get one, except that it’s not for her collection. It could be to use it. I’d like to think that’s not the case. I prefer it be for drugs that way she’s only harming herself physically. And packages hold a lot of small things… More than one package could be for the weekly stash or to distribute.

    @Billi:
    In your copy/paste of Me’s comments, one word stuck out …. arsenal. Why did Me use that word? I guess to emphasize how he’ll keep certain secrets, but it’s not a word you hear everyday.

    Reply
  41. Liin said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:33 am

    Cheers Billi, I must have missed that major posting by ME yesterday.

    I am a woman of the world, open minded, curious etc etc., my only question from that posting is, the heinous, horrible acts that are so so shocking – WHAT CAN THEY BE? To me beastiality is shocking only because I am a major animal nut, but the only thing on the planet which one cannot comprehend is paedophilia – which ME said it wasnt. So if she isnt messing with children, selling them for sex tapes/sex slaves/kiddie porn etc then I cannot think of anything else, any thought?

    Reply
  42. d said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:35 am

    Keane said There was no discernible point 2 her being here. She said nothing specific or concrete at all, just generalizations. The way she sang 1 person’s phrases & lambasted another is also v suspect, truth is usually more complex than that. If she is legit she will b back with some details of who she is & more of a point 2 what she’s saying & kate & I will b able 2 tell whether she’s legit or not v easily.

    UMMM what does everyone on here do ??? Its all just generalizations and speculation – there’s NO proof of anything. And if this blog isnt’ slanted AGAINST Angelina, i don’t know what else you’d call it. JMO

    Reply
  43. keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:35 am

    Re: Ange falling over & crying = “poor angie” pr. Probably totally made up.

    Off topic re: toothy tiles, friend of friend who was over last nite met him in ny just after donny darko came out, group of friends all went on nite out 2gether. This guy says they were all gay who were there that nite. My friend is gay also.

    Reply
  44. aaaaa said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:37 am

    About faxing, Who faxes anymore?

    Reply
  45. tyin said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:41 am

    @keane:
    met him… who? i mean, who is this “him”?
    not sure i got the point of your post…

    Reply
  46. anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:48 am

    @Billi: For those that think Me was legit, here’s a recap of his/her posts yesterday. Still say if AJ is as bad as Me implies (horrible, heinous acts) then why no action on the part of ME or others…
    Maybe he/she needs Brad’s approval to take action. What if Brad denied these allegations?

    Reply
  47. p said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:51 am

    @caea: .

    Awww caea is just trying to be helpful.

    Together class… “Thank you caea!”

    Reply
  48. girly said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Hi all I am new here, just found the site on Tuesday. I’ve been refreshing so often that I actually told myself to get a life last nt. LOL I just want to say that I despise Skankelina and I want nothing more than for her to be outed and get what’s coming to her. I too am tired of all the other sites being so Pro Brangelina. I think it’s disgusting. However some of you have made some REALLY vile suggestions. Even in my bitter hate towards her fake ass, I really hope some of these things aren’t true. Wow that totally made me sound like an Angelina lover but I assure you I’m not. LOL

    Reply
  49. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:56 am

    @tyin:
    Met who most people are guessing is toothy tile and starred in the movie donnie darko.

    Reply
  50. LurkeyLoo said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:56 am

    Gone into hiding from WHAT??? Give me a break, it’s JUST a HW actress with a stick up her ass and she weighs all of 90 lbs….sure, she has bodyguards, but let’s get real. I agree with the earlier post regarding the ability to run your website from ANYWHERE…beginning to not buy any of this…too bad…I’d love to see the two of them in ruins…they deserve it with the way they have treated people and the “hloier than thou” attitude.

    Reply
  51. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    @tyin:Keane had a friend over last night and introduced him to this site and we all said hello and welcome. He has a friend who is gay who met toothy time in NY and then they all went out together. Toothy Tile is widely belieed to be Jake Gyllenhaal (sp?)

    Reply
  52. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    @keane:Yes, just a PR stunt to raise sympathy.

    Reply
  53. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    @Constant Gardner:I love your posts, CG. You have brought some very thoughtful insight to the board. I agree with you. Following the money trail has been the downfall of many a high profile crook. I also loved the movie CG, and maybe there’s a big corporate player in this drama too, ya think?

    Reply
  54. mandy said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:15 am

    Doesn’t Bill Clinton have an office in Harlem? Maybe he is the much older man. This was the first thing that came to mind when Harlem was mentioned.

    Reply
  55. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    @rotorua:Me too, R. I want Me to come back and chat with us today. Me was NOT an Angie operative. He/s did not do present the way those knuckleheads do. Me “gets it”.

    Reply
  56. heavensinyou said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    @Kikumon:

    I was thinking the same thing. IT was first to post, as if IT had been waiting up all night for the “Order to Go” thread to be posted. Odd behavior for someone who doesn’t believe any of Ian’s blogs. It’s probably just AJ, waiting with bated breath.

    Reply
  57. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:22 am

    @Mama San:Morning, Mama San. Ready for some amateur sleuthing?

    Reply
  58. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:26 am

    @Billi:To add my 2 cents. I don’t think anyone behaved badly yesterday at all. Of course we’re skeptical of anyone who says they’re an insider. Everyone (well, most everyone, ‘cept the occasional critical one-stop loon) on here is intelligent, courteous. No worries about etiquette, here. IMO.

    Reply
  59. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:30 am

    @K2:Hey, thanks for posting that. Confirms what we suspect—she’s under PRESSURE. People under pressure make errors, and that’s when stuff gets leaked and illuminated.

    Reply
  60. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:35 am

    Two questions?

    K2. who wrote that story?

    And

    Is that it for the major story, she buys packages in Harlem?

    Reply
  61. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:36 am

    @keane:Morning Keane. See now I think someone who is inside anothers “camp” in this case Brad’s, is gonna come onto a web site that web from 50 hits to 500 in ONE DAY. Obviously, IUC has gotten the attention of lawyers, PR people. This is a fire that they see as maybe could get out of control. And right now, it appears as if it’s on, it’s war. That’s when “sources” like Me feel they have to speak up. And Me said he wants AJ to know she’s got an enemy with ammo. Just in case her lawyers think NO ONE knows about her evil deeds. Plus, Me didn’t act/sound like he was trying to shut down Ian and change our opinion about what we think. (A typical way for people to behave when they don’t like what’s being said.) Plus, he/she (why does everyone this Me is a woman?) stayed long enough to make his/her presence known, to state his/her objective. Me sounds legit to me. And I wouldn’t be at all surprised to get a few more “insiders” in the coming days. IUC has attracted the attention of the ‘players’ in this drama. Ian’s applying the heat, and the public is noticing. Lawyers and PR people are too. JMO.

    Reply
  62. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:40 am

    @Kate:It does say “developing” so maybe there’s more. I think the Limo driver is a bit scared to say too much, or doesn’t want to give it all away and ruin his book.

    Doesn’t seem reasonable to send a limo to pick up drugs, but wouldn’t be suspicious if it were just legal packages. Why make several stops if it was a drug run, sounds more like he was running regular errands

    Reply
  63. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:45 am

    @Liin:Good point. The thing that stuck me about ME’s comments is that what h/she’s got on AJ is “inhuman.” That is pretty strong words, partner. Me said what AJ’s been up to “everyday” (and that humanitarian work is what she does to ease her conscience) is INHUMAN, and worse than what we’ve been speculating. Well, we’ve had some pretty wild and dirty speculation here, doncha think. What inhuman behavior HAVEN’T we touched upon? LOL

    Reply
  64. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:46 am

    I must be a bit slow on the uptake today but it just occured to me that this is the go-to-game Sugar referenced LOL

    Reply
  65. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:50 am

    @anonymous:IMO no one wants to get in the middle of this mess, which is between AJ and Brad. Me said s/he was “self protecting” which I would certainly do, but Me also said “I’m squeky clean” and that h/she has an attorney. Me wanted to get to AJ. Me wanted her to know that whatever she does, she better watch her back b/c s/he’s willing to go public.

    Reply
  66. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:52 am

    @LurkeyLoo:People like AJ with lots of $$$ and power and influence can cause a LOT of damage to someone who is gunnin’ for em. And do it with complete obsurity. That’s why little computer gossipers like Perez are NOT investigative reporters. It’s a dangerous job.

    Reply
  67. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    @K2:
    Sympathy? Everything is crashing down on her/them?

    Reply
  68. Liin said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    @Knowone – exactly my point, is there anything that ‘Inhuman’ left to do on the planet that would shock us all to our cores!?! you are quite right, Im sure we have discussed most of them already. LOL

    Reply
  69. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    @knowone:
    “What inhuman behavior HAVEN’T we touched upon? LOL”

    I don’t know dude. How about human sacrifice or cannibalism or human torture? That’s some strange shit. I think that’s just way out there though. It could be what FRAUD said about the money not going to charities and such.

    Reply
  70. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:57 am

    @caea:
    Then get off & stay off. Go to a site you like.

    Reply
  71. Liin said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:02 am

    Nice AFM – sacrifice, cannibalism, torture – good ones, but are they really really shocking? This day and age we have seen, heard it all before (please dont get me wrong, they are all sick!) I am just wondering if ME was legit, and when ME says is shocking, maybe its only shocking to the extent that you wouldnt expect Angie to do this (being a saint and all that) but in the scheme of this sick world, maybe its just a eye roll or eyebrow raiser, or in fact just plain old fraud – jail sentence would be good then.LOL

    Reply
  72. too curious said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    Inhuman = knowingly transmitting fatal disease to others? Maybe doing so on purpose – to play “God” with others lives?

    Doping Brad and then shooting him up with heroin to the point he is addicted???

    Getting animals hooked on heroin? Maybe the pitbull was on drugs and that is why it was willing to do the skank AJ….

    Reply
  73. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @Liin:Someone up above mentioned animal abuse, and I’m thinking it could be that. AJ’s on record for saying she can’t keep a pet alive….and even kicked dogs in her childhood, etc. And we know how she used the bulldog. But Me said “inhuman” and also criminal. And remember a previous SR post that cited Michael Vicks (could have the name wrong, I can’t remember) who was arrested for animal abuse. Could AJ be doing something inhuman using animals?

    Reply
  74. anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    @knowone: That’s exactly what I thought. Me wants AJ to know that he is in the know.

    Reply
  75. LurkeyLoo said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:08 am

    I totally understand the $$$ and influence she packs…but I think the whole “going into hiding” thing is a bit dramatic. I mean, this site is still up (of which I am glad) and operable….so, what is with the hiding??? To me, it discredits all that has been said previously….and I want to believe. ;o) @knowone:

    Reply
  76. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:09 am

    I mean, the bulldog story might not be just a one-time thing for her….and it might even be worse than just a “sexual” thing with animals.

    Reply
  77. Jaguar said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:14 am

    I hope the “older man” isn’t Clint Eastwood, it was posted previously that Angelina has an obsession with his wife Dina. That would ruin my opinion of him considerably. He has already made the comment “She is an actress hampered by her gorgeous face–I think the most beautiful face on the planet,” which was gag-worthy enough.

    Maybe “Me” is Brad’s brother?

    Reply
  78. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:18 am

    @LurkeyLoo:I love investigative reporting, but there’s a reason it’s a dying thing. Because if the “subject” of the investigation finds out where you live, stuff starts happening your home, your friends, your family.

    Stay safe Ian. I mean it.

    Reply
  79. jeannie said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:19 am

    @knowone:
    That’s what I was thinking also. If (according to ME) these “most heinous and inhumane acts” don’t involve children (and the worst do imo)or drugs than they must be about animals. Is she into black magic/voodoo or satanism and has to kill animals on a daily basis? Maybe she’s a part of distributing snuff films or something.

    Reply
  80. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    Sorry guys, am on the move today, not much time to post. All I’m saying is if ME is legit and is actually going to be more specific about who they are and what they know then they will come back to do so. They have done nothing so far other than say they know them all and know of some “heinous acts”. Until more detail is given on what that might be or who they are then they are about as believable as the fact that Caea knows her way around a photocopier. If they are legit and want to share information then they will be back with it. If not then you cannot believe a word they said at this stage. It could honestly be anyone, a total fake at this stage. Let’s not be too hung up on them right now, better to stick with what we know is coming from a genuine source i.e. Ian’s/SR’s sources. There’s no point speculating on something that could be completely made up and we have no background on which to base it on. No-one will be scared off by a bit of innocent questioning if they are legit. But they will if they aren’t because they know once they start giving details of who they are they can be easily caught out by people who know about whatever business they claim to be in, group they claim to hang with etc. Like I said, this person gave no details about any part of who they were, just general claims and allegations. We’ve had this before when somone came on and posted that she definitely knew Brange were married and that she was an insider, then she back tracked and it turned out it was just something she’d picked up on another webvsite and she didn’t know for sure at all. People wasted a lot of time speculating on the infos seh gave. The only things that are really worth speculating on here are the things coming from SR and Ian, as they are the only people who have a face and a name and are saying things from legitimate (we hope) sources.

    Reply
  81. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:29 am

    @knowone:
    Thank you. Someone posted a link to the NCCS ( I am sorry not to credit the link it is on one of the threads from last night). At any rate, a few clicks and you can view the tax return for the JP foundation. Of interest is the foundations investments in 2007:

    Jolie-Pitt Foundation
    EIN: 20-5176706
    Taxable Year Ending December 31, 2007
    Form 990-PF, Part II, Line 10c – Columns (b) & (c ) – Investments : Corporate Bonds
    Line 1 Oc – Column ( b) Line 10c – Column (c)
    Shares Description/Symbol/CUSIP Number Book Value Fair Market Value
    237000 Amer Express Credit 3% 5/15/08 (025818EM3) $232,262.37 $235,317.30
    150000 BANK OF AMERICA 4.9% 1/30/08 (06050YNY3) $150,000.00 $150,030.00
    150000 BK OF IRELD DISC C/P 1/10/08 (06278LAA3) $148,158.50 $149,828.70
    250000 CITIGROUP DISC C/P 0% 3/4/08 (17307RC44) $246,875.00 $247,847.25
    250000 DEERE JOHN CAP CORP MTNS BE 4.625% 04/15/2009 FR (24422EPP8) $247,305.00 $250,190.00
    200000 DEPHA BANK DISC C/P 0% 3/17/08 (2495E0CH5) $197,563.22 $197,975.00
    250000 GE CAP CORP SER A 3.5% 05/01/08 (36962GB78) $245,987.50 $248,795.00
    250000 GOLDMAN SACHS SRUNSUB NT 6.65% 5/15/2009 (38141GAA2) $257,265.00 $256,737.50
    250000 HSBC FINANCE CORP 6.400% DUE 06/17/2008 @ 100.00 (441812FY5) $252,892.50 $251,360.00
    250000 IBM 4.375% 06/01/09 (45920QES9) $246,517.50 $252,287.50
    41000 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FIN CORP 4.500% 05/01/2008 NT (459745FF7) $40,680.20 $40,859.37
    300000 LANDESBANK DISC CP 1/7/08 (5148X0A70) $296,212.50 $299,789.70
    250000
    LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC NOTE DTD 2/25/2004 3.6% 3/13/2009 $243 314.50 $244 437.50
    (52517PVU2)
    , ,
    250000 MERRILL DISC C/P 0% 1/15/08 (59018JAF1) $248,488.13 $249,520.75
    100000 PRUDENTIAL DISC C/P 0% 2/6/08 (74432JB67) $99,015.97 $99,470.10
    100000 SOCIETE GEN DISC C/P 0% 3/3/8 (83365RC37) $98,728.53 $99,147.70
    290000 WELLS FARGO & CO 3.5% 04/04/2008 (949746EX5) $285,948.70 $288,796.50
    200000 BNP PARIBAS DISC C/P 0.00% 1/22/08 (BNP12208) $198,285.70 $199,455.80
    200000 LLOYDS BK DISC C/P 0.00% 1/02/08 (LLOYDS128) $198,388.00 $200,000.00
    TOTAL. $3,933,889 $3,961,846

    The foundation lost its ass in 2008 with these investments.
    Sorry for the bunny trail/thread drift-just found this very interesting. There is much more to be discovered about these people.

    Reply
  82. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Good morning all. Trying to catch up (and failing) before my sleeping munchkins wake up. Hubby is off today so won’t have much time to hang around once they all come downstairs…

    @Mama San:
    Mama San! WHAT are you talkin’ about? She’s CONTRIBUTING to the discussion. Just ask her.
    Actually, this twat is stuck on stupid, so I think she needs to be ignored completely. Maybe it’ll get bored and go away.@CC:
    Sadly, I think almost ANY man is prone to being ruled by the little head, and she is a spellbinder, that one.
    Okay, I got a joke:
    Why is a penis so stupid?
    Because it has a head, but no brain. It has one eye, but can’t see. It hangs around with a couple of nuts and lives around the corner from an asshole.
    {{Badump-dump}}

    Reply
  83. Jaguar said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:37 am

    @Keane:
    I have to add that the “staplership” comments the other day were hilarious! Thanks for the LOL.

    Reply
  84. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    @Tamara:
    Yeah, what more would anyone expect from a literal drama queen?
    Pffft.

    Reply
  85. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    @jeannie:I think you might be right. Gross. This is both Humiliating and Criminal, and she’s such a wicked, weird dark person.

    Reply
  86. heavensinyou said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:44 am

    @knowone:

    Maybe AJ is not just buying babies, but selling them, too? She’s forcing those poor parents in Third World country to relinquish their children so they can be sold on the black market. Child exploitation and trafficking is about as “INHUMAN” as it gets. Just a guess. ;-)

    Reply
  87. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:45 am

    @Tamara:
    I agree- why not have who ever she trusts/wants to do the pickup in a regular inconspicuous vehicle? Surely they must have one lying around somewhere that would attract less attention, no?

    Reply
  88. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:46 am

    @knowone:
    Personally, I don’t buy that she does the UN work to ease her conscience- she probably doesn’t even HAVE one.
    I think the UN work is to enhance her image, plain and simple.

    Reply
  89. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    @Angie’s Fax Machine:
    Just a thought- we all know she travels to these third world places and likes to pretend to one with the natives. Did she participate in some dark-sided rituals type stuff?

    Reply
  90. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    @Constant Gardner:Awesome post. I’m sure Ian can use this. I’m no financial expert, but with all the banking fraud that’s been illuminated in the past year, maybe connected to JP foundation, too? I think Section 9 said it well in his post last night (I think) that sexual immorality usually doesn’t tank a career. Fraud does.

    Reply
  91. anonymous said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    @LurkeyLoo: We don’t know who else is involved in this story, and whoever it is could be a dangerous person. Just google the names and drugs, and you will find some interesting stuff.

    Reply
  92. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    @McDooks:Bwwaaaaaaa. Good one. I’m gonna “member” that one.

    Reply
  93. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:55 am

    Awright guys, I’m out. My peeps is up and “real life” is calling. Enjoy your day, happy pontificating!

    Reply
  94. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:56 am

    @heavensinyou:OOOOOHHHH, I like that theory. That fits all the criteria too, i.e. it’s hypocritical, fraudulent, inhuman, humiliating, and criminal.

    Reply
  95. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:58 am

    @McDooks:Limos are the obvious way she travels, and she doesn’t want to arose any more suspicion among her staff than she already has. If she normally travels by limo to and from the set, then a limo on an “errand” seems like everyday, routine errands, no?

    Reply
  96. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:01 am

    From how I read ME’s comments, whatever AJ is up to doesn’t involve HER children.

    Reply
  97. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    @McDooks:Yeah, I hear ya. Conscience, what’s that? But, if she is borderline personality disorder, the humanitarian work serves both purposes, makes her appear to have a conscience, and also gives her the great image she so aspires to have. There is no good medical treatment for BPD. It is NOT a mental illness, it is a CHARACTER DISORDER. There’s a BIG difference. These people can’t be “cured.” Sorry to offend anyone who has this disorder, but it is something I have some experience with, not personally, but in my sphere.

    Reply
  98. HisHighness said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    Breaking news coming soon!

    Reply
  99. keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:14 am

    Hi all am on my blackberry & not all messages r coming up so sorry if I’m repeating myself or s’thing others have said. This is VERY IMPORTANT. I just want 2 make sure that all r aware that what they say on this site is their responsibility & not ian’s. People posting on blogs can & have been sued in the past (ask Kate). Be careful what u say. If we r giving opinions on what we think Ian means in his posts we r fine. However if we r commenting on s’thing that another poster has suggested which we have no proof is from a legit source & they r not putting their name 2 it, we have no basis on which 2 speculate. Some1 has come on here & said AJ commits heinous acts, people r now speculating on the worst things imaginable. Serious criminal activity that there has been no mention or suggestion of in Ian’s posts. Wild speculation based on posts other than by ian etc cld totally discredit this site & have it shut down or potebtially prompt legal action. Please only speculate on things ian or sr have said, not unidentified posters on the comments section. There cld b serious consequences. Back soon, hope all r well x

    Reply
  100. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:15 am

    @Different Guest:That’s how I read it too. And that makes sense to me, that she, in her mind, thinks she’s a good mother (God, how delusional, we all know being a good mother is being a good role model, inside the home, DUH), so I think her evil deeds are on a grander scale.

    Reply
  101. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:16 am

    @McDooks:
    Oooops, I meant to say happy pondering! Don’t know where pontificating came in, sorry!
    I snuck back for a quick minute – I think I need an intervention….

    Reply
  102. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:18 am

    @keane:I don’t understand this, Keane. It makes me want to leave, frankly. I thought we are all protected from the freedom of speech that is the unregulated internet. Speculation is what gossip is. We are merely the sideline observers. The public. This scares me.

    Reply
  103. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    @knowone:
    I see your point, but Ian’s post says she asked her driver to drive her friend (not Scrangie herself) to run those errands…

    Reply
  104. cynicalone said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    @McDooks:
    She may have had the limo drive her friend because her friend might not have felt comfortable going to that area alone. The limo driver said he was afraid just pulling up to those places. How much more frightening would it have been for a person to drive themselves, park, walk to their destination, then walk back to whereever they were able to park alone? Angie seems to be arrogant enough that she wouldn’t worry about some limo driver bringing her down. JMO…

    Reply
  105. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:43 am

    @keane:I’m just thinking out loud, as always. Last night, SR’s post brought about some Very Wild speculation about criminal activity vis a vis blood diamonds trafficing, etc. This was based upon smart readers using their noggins to decifer SR’s post. Does that mean those “wild” speculations, which indeed were criminal speculations, are somehow “protected” b/c they were generated by SR’s poem, and not by another anonymous poster’s cryptic information?

    Reply
  106. Angie's Fax Machine said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    @keane:
    Thanx for the heads up, Keane. That’s a scary thought. I think most of us here are stating our opinions and simply speculating. Hopefully no one has crossed any lines here.

    Reply
  107. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    It got quiet.

    Reply
  108. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    L@keane:
    I second that Keane I am reading along and thinking I hope everyone is not using anything that they can be traced with,LOL jmo

    Reply
  109. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    @pookiedoll:Yeah, I’m a little scared now. I don’t/didn’t sign on this site with a fake email address, which was suggested in another thread as something everyone should do. I’ve always used my real email address. And then Keane’s comment that a blog poster could get sued kinda wigs me out.

    Reply
  110. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    @cynicalone:
    I understand what you’re saying, but I was relating more to what the limo driver that Ian quoted as saying “who in their right mind drives a limo to the places she sent me to”. I was suggesting that it would be much more common sensical to send a discrete vehicle rather than a limo, with a driver and the friend together in said discrete vehicle. Just noting that Scrangie ain’t got no common sense to do sketchy things discretely.

    Reply
  111. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    @Kate:Hi Kate. What did Keane mean when she said “ask Kate” in her above post? Are we regular readers OK with our speculation on this board? As long as we don’t claim to be “insiders” and then say a bunch of smack?

    Reply
  112. sinker said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    gulp.

    could there be a Marilyn Manson, honorary priest – Church of Satan connection? AJ has known him a long time….

    Reply
  113. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    Uh Oh! Big Ripple just passed through the site. Maybe Ian should delete all our posts and we can all change our log on names to fake email addresses. Im serious!

    Reply
  114. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    @McDooks:Opps, missed that factoid (that it was the friend, not her)….didn’t think she had any friends. ha.

    Reply
  115. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    @Tamara:I think you might be right. I loves me some gossip, but I don’t have any financial wiggle room to pay for it. LOL

    Reply
  116. cynicalone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    @McDooks:
    Ah! On that point, we definitely agree!

    Reply
  117. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    @knowone:
    I would be 5 bucks that any “friend” of hers is more like an obsessed pet or lackey than a real friend.

    Reply
  118. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    @knowone:
    Okay I am back to my computer. I was reading along on my IPOD at an appointment. Okay, Ian is protected as is the ISP, that is the way Internet law works unless he with intent puts up something that is a blatant lie knowing it is , with maliicious intent, otherwise he is protected under a immunity rule . For us however, we are not, we can be sued. It is a long process, and it would be stupid for Angelina to do it, because then it would put everything IAN has said in the news, but it can happen, and it has.

    So basically always make it clear you are discussing the topic at hand, that you are not a insider and that it is just your opinion., and not a fact, whatever you are saying.

    Reply
  119. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:26 pm

    @Tamara:Love your puppy. I have two pet ferrets and a dog. (Notice my change of chat…..lol)

    Reply
  120. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    @knowone:
    Me neither. Am I missing something or is there not a sign out for this site? Wish Kate would answer.

    Reply
  121. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    @Kate:Thanks Kate. That is what I thought, but your response gives me some relief, ’cause I’ve been a pretty wild speculator here, and I do always take caution to say “I think” ‘JMO’ and that I don’t know a dang thing about anybody. lol

    Reply
  122. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    @Kate:
    Thanks Kate.

    Reply
  123. pookiedoll said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    @knowone:
    I’m feeling a little better too. Damn!

    Reply
  124. frmale said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    i didn\t know that

    Reply
  125. aaaaa said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    right kate sued myspace once

    Reply
  126. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    Ok, then. Topic at hand. AJ sends “friend” to Harlem to pick up Package. Drugs? Vital documents? Where’s Brad?

    Reply
  127. ladybert62 said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    just testing out my new fake name!

    Reply
  128. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    @knowone:
    I have said this before but you guys were not around but I have several friends paying dearly for mistakes they made on the internet. Civil suits. I will tell you a funny story, I know someone (unrelated) who went undercover for a book he was helping someone with, he was not writing it but he was researching. He went in disguise, he lived on the east coast , drove across to the west coast, hid out, and I mean hid out with some very rough seed types that had made threats to kill and others related to the book. They never even knew he was who he was until they read what they said in the book , lol Now their names were changed just slightly because they were not asked for permission to use their name, but everyone knew who they were. It was a huge criminal trial and the book was written by a lawyer. lol and he did some of that himself. It was pretty amusing to listen to his stories.

    Reply
  129. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Ok, maybe AJ is the “cover up” process in Harlem. You know how she loves to use contracts to control. Maybe she’s retracing her steps and is now dropping off/picking up signed contracts for people to STFU. Drug dealers can’t squeal? JMO, LOL

    Reply
  130. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    @knowone:
    I say it was drugs, she made several stops, so maybe she got her stash and each one could only give her so much so she used several different people or it was several different kinds of drugs. jmo Brad imo France unless he has returned, but no pics. I think the story of him sitting in the corner with Shiloh was based on a old incident. As far as Jolie falling down crying , who wrote that, who sources said she was turned down in the Phillipines because I can not believe she would be stupid enough to think she could adopt from there and without Brad. Didn’t happen. She cannot pass herself as a Christian or anything remotely to that and those values. Please.

    K2 who was the author of that, there was no link.

    Reply
  131. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @Kate:Wow, yeah, that’s the life of a reporter and/or writer. I think the UK and USA are very different in some ways. Keane was saying that even making a death threat (verbal) in the UK brings arrest. See, in the US, it’s all about lawsuits, not so much about law enforcement. And I think that’s where our society begins to protect the rich and jail the poor. JMO, of course. But an observation.

    Reply
  132. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    @HisHighness:
    Missed this, I knew you had to be bringing more. Are you smacking that limo guy around or water boarding him, LOL Yeah!

    Okay for those who keep saying that IAN does not need to hide out, he hid out in the mountains for months when he did the book on the Zulu for his safety. Don’t kid yourself. There was a reporter in Manhattan not more than a month ago murdered in his apartment…..and he was small fry.

    Hey IAN, stay safe, and Miss Nines is doing fine as is Sugar ray but whack that limo driver he is not given up the goods. lol jmo

    Cheers!

    Reply
  133. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    @Kate:I agree with you. Brad went to France and imo that’s where he’s been this entire time. Did you read that link Susana posted to that 2000 Esquire interview with Scrangie. It was THE MOST BIZARRE interview I’ve ever read. She was incoherent. The reporter could not understand a single thing she was trying to say. The resulting piece was 100% about her demeanor. And the reporter was kind. Not after her in a negative way at all. He was trying to understand her, but she was a complete and total wreck. Read it if you have time. It is VERY illuminating as to her strange, STRANGE, inner working.

    Reply
  134. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    @knowone:
    I want to add this, if you are not using your real email, that you pay for or even a email account with your legal name that can be matched to your IP you are basically safe, almost impossible to trace you, unless you are dumb enough to post from your work email and use that email address when you do.:) I don’t spend time on message boards , not this type, but when my friend was working on the book I helped with the research so I was on a couple for that, and got well versed in what I could do and not. I was told up front, help me research, but you better not screw this up, we used a proxy also.

    Reply
  135. DebFrmHell said on April 17th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Just last week, Ian was asking for more hits by his “email this to everyone you know” request. Now the site is up on hits probably by a triple amount. By Ian’s own addmission, he wanted to set a record for hits.

    The wildest speculations have been going on for days. One rumor begets 50 outlandish rumors. It seems that whenever there is a post here it almost simultaneously goes out to at least one other popular “anti-Brangie” website in thier forum. I find that to be a little more than suspicious when it comes to generating additional hits to this site. There are going to be internet peeps coming in with all kinds of theories based on little or no fact. The fun seems to be in the speculation until it gets out of hand. It is up to the individual poster to discern what is and what is not believeable. Everyone wants to believe the absolute worst on just a little bit of hearsay and that is what gossip is all about.

    I personally do not worry about lawsuits over something I have said over the net. The major point is that it serves to discredit the site.

    When you ask for that kind of exposure, you have to take the bitter with the sweet.

    JMO.

    Reply
  136. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    @knowone:We just had a long walk at the lake, shes my baby. Sorry about the change in topic everyone! hahaha

    Reply
  137. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    @knowone:
    I read that years ago, that was during a time when she was not concerned about what people thought and it was during the time when reporters had much more freedom to write how the interview went down. If you look at all her Esquire interviews, I think he has written some others after that one and you can tell he was put on a leash. lol Things have changed quite a bit. They tend to use the same guy they have known for years and years. One reported talked about how with Brad, he used to get an hour, now they gave him all the info up front, that had been in other interviews, then he get s 5 min just i update it and with a warning of what he can not discuss, and this is a friend..reporter. He is too big a star now. I think that was the name of the article. That is why we see so many cut and paste. I get amused seeing the girls at FF say, Brad put this out, Jolie put this out. Some they do yes, but damn not everything. Some are obvious just stupid reporters that have nothing to write so they recycle, and nothing more. Brad and Jolie do not put out every article that comes out on them, hell no one has that much time. jmo

    Reply
  138. dina said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    Kate, thanks for the heads up!

    Ian or Ms. 9, did the limo driver ever get a peek at what was in the “packages”?

    Hope all is going well for you Ian! Stay safe.

    Reply
  139. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    @DebFrmHell:
    Well it does not hurt Ian, not one bit, he can not be sued for one word we say , that is the point. We can claim anything and everything and he is safe unless someone on here threatens bodily harm to another poster and then he is obligated to report that and remove any nasty posts vile dirty if they are really obsene. that is his discretion. That is one poster to the next though.

    Reply
  140. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Guess what movie I watched yesterday. MAMS. Saw it when it was released, but in light of recent developments, I watched it again (on my direct TV library). LIFE imitating art, it seems. These two wanted fast paced, top of the pedestal status, and now, well, here’s the results of that life. The life that we’re all supposed to admire and emulate. AJ can’t play a normal, decent person in her movies. She can only play dark, b/c that’s true to her nature. JMO.

    Reply
  141. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    @aaaaa:
    I know someone that sued myspace, a member photo shopped pics of them and they could not get them down. Pics were fake of course, and I just saw in the news recently that some other dimwit did that online to someone and is being sued. It was a prank, but a costly one.

    Reply
  142. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    @knowone:
    Well she always said she plays the parts that she wants to be. lol and that is her therapy. You should see the uncut outtakes. ah ahem …

    Reply
  143. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    @Kate:Yes, and I think the news outlet should have to specify when they use recycled stuff. Obviously, I am on the side of truth and transparency, especially in the press. I like it when a magazine piece states “we could only get a 10 minute interview” that tells the reader something. I really liked the NYT piece revealing the fakery behind Brand Brangie.

    Reply
  144. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    @Kate:So what part will we see her in next? Not likely it will be the “part” of stay-at-home mom, which is the most important part she should be engaging in. She always SAYS she’s gonna take off time to be with the children, but funny how that never quite happens. Global domination always gets in the way of the simple life. LOL

    Reply
  145. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @Kate:You know what, imo she was playing herself in Gia. Seriously, I had difficulty separating her from her character in that movie, what did you think?

    Reply
  146. Elle said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @caea:
    [How about this: this site contains the lowest form of gossip such as defamation, slander and harrassment far surpassing the british yellow press. And since most people here -well at least you and Keane and Kate- take every word Ian utters as the holy truth I have tried to open your eyes in a different way by showing what defamation really mwans. Got it?]

    But how can you educate them when you don’t know the meanings yourself?

    If the site gets to you so much, may I suggest not visiting it?

    At the end of the day, do you really think people really care about these people? They are ACTORS. Does money really buy that much?

    Reply
  147. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @Kate:I’d love to see those!!!!!! I must say, there was quite a lot of “chemisty” between those two in MAMS. See where vajaja worship leads, boys? Thinking with the little head?

    Reply
  148. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    @knowone:I agree. I was saying that yesterday, how every time she gets a baby she says shes going to take a year off and next thing you know shes filming another movie. jmo haha See how I keep putting that jmo in there! LOL

    Reply
  149. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    @Tamara:I agree, and she was playing herself in Girl, Interrupted, a brilliant performance, I thought.

    Reply
  150. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    @Tamara:Haaaaaaaaaa. Yes, very good Tamara, with the JMO and IMO (dang, we can never be too safe when it comes to the long and scrawny arms of Cruella).

    Reply
  151. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @Tamara:Filming again, or making sure she’s being accompanied by a high profile reporter to a third world country to do what God him(her)self can’t do. Save the world, Angie. But first, save yourself. JMO

    Reply
  152. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    @knowone:
    I wish we could have ferrets legally here in CA. I would really love to have a pair.

    Reply
  153. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    @McDooks:I’ve had them for pets for years. These are so funny. They have a bad rap, and the ferret “community” really doesn’t know why. But it does put some of my dates off a bit. Weasels as pets, get outta town. They do stink (even when they’re descented) but they’re very clean. They sleep like 18 hours and day, and party for like 5. Good pets. That’s my ferret PR for the day. LOL

    Reply
  154. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    @McDooks:I am not very good at avatars and stuff, McD. I did find a ferret avatar. How do I get it on my name here?

    Reply
  155. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    @knowone:I meant GIA, that was the name of a model, it was a true story. Gia was pretty famous in the 80;s. She was a huge drug addict and lesbian, lots of lesbian love scenes, very disturbed personality, self harming, the works. But yeah, she was wierd in Girl Interrupted too. Thats the one she won an Oscar for where she kissed her brother James. It was meant as a vehicle for Winona Ryder and ended up winning AJ an Oscar! LOL jmo (teehee)

    Reply
  156. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    @knowone:Do you have a personal picture of your ferrets? Because if you just follow the links on gravatar.com you can upload your own photo.

    Reply
  157. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    @Tamara:Yeah, I’m familiar with Gia—the person and the movie, and yeah, def think AJ’s “life” served as a huge inspiration for that role, too. Does she choose these roles b/c she’s dark, or does she “become” the person she plays? She takes method acting to a whole new level, ay?

    Reply
  158. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    @knowone:LOL they party for 5 hahaha

    Reply
  159. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

    @Tamara:I have a graphic of a ferret (funny thing, they don’t stay posed long enough for good close ups). I did go to gravatar.com and registered (uh oh, another place with my REAL email address, now what???!!!)

    Reply
  160. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    @knowone:
    LOL who knows, she didnt exactly go into it with James Lipton, spent the whole hour flashing her eyes at him and squirming in her seat!! jmo

    Reply
  161. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    @knowone:Oh! They didnt ask you what image to use? I only did it yesterday for the first time. Does anyone else know who can help???

    Reply
  162. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    @tyin:The National Ledger. Hey AJ, your lies are being reported in the MSM. Better get a more coherent action plan together, eh? NL says your pregnant. We know you’re not. How ya gonna spin it girl? We’re all atwitter waiting to know.

    Reply
  163. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    @knowone:don’t know why that’s red. sorry.

    Reply
  164. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Nine just put up an update from inside camp AJ that she’s NOT preggers. Been with more gals than dudes lately.

    Reply
  165. wondering said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    @K2:
    hmmm….could the bursting into tears after running after a dog have anything to do with “patches” running down her mouth (paraphrasing from the other IUC exclusive) like an “exclamation” mark…could it mean blood?…after performing some satanic ritual on a dog she committed acts of bestiality with?…could that explain the “velvet lined boxes” as well, that she cut the dog in pieces after some ritual, because she is going crazy from the meth and is a satanist too? would this be connected to the previous “scratches on the floor” mention as well? just wondering. absolutely horrifying if this is true about her. there certainly are a lot of rumors of satanism among politicians/persons of power/persons in her sphere. just horrifying to think about.

    Reply
  166. oh said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    Brad comes from parents who profess to be Baptist. Get the feeling his desire to rebel in his heart/live on the edge/expand his horizons in life took him to the point where God allowed him to have so much of what he thought he wanted, he should never (hopefully) want evil again….to literally make him sick of it. Kind of like a parent who gives a kid so many cigarettes he turns green, pukes and never wants to touch them again. Hope my feeling proves to be true for his sake.

    Reply
  167. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:44 pm

    @knowone:
    Go to gravatar.com. Thing is, I had to put my email account (so if you want to use an alternate email be sure to do so) and then when I clicked on “browse” to add the picture , now it shows my avie. I commented on another blog and my avitar automatically showed with my comment there. I don’t know if that’s good or bad, but just FYI.

    Reply
  168. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    @Tamara:
    Yeah, knowone, that was funny!!!

    Reply
  169. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    Hey guys, am back home and am relieved that you took my advice about not speculating too wildly about things Ian has not given us a suggestion of. Be careul not to be led by posters on this site claiming to be insiders with absolutely no detail or evidence to corroborate it. My thinking is that “Me” could have come on this site to get people to speculate on what “heinous” acts Ange may have carried out. Everything he/she said was very inflammatory but there were no specifics which left everything wide open. I do not believe a word he or she said at this stage. Just be aware that Angelina, Brad and their people are watching these sites like hawks and have been trying to disrupt it constantly from word go. They have suddenly gone very quiet which is odd as the stories have got much much worse. “Me” could well be the latest, slightly sneakier strategy. Always beware new posters coming on to the site saying they just discovered it and know all the inside story etc. This almost never happens. Most people reading and posting here will have read other blogs for a long time, possibly have other usernames you recognise etc or would at least say they’ve been reading it for a while. To say I just heard about this site yesterday and turns out I know all 3 of them and I have info that will take Angelina down, I’m readfy for war etc is highly, highly suspect. If he/she were ready for war if necessary, the last thing they would do is declare that on a site Angelina is known to be reading every day. We have to think these people through logically as they’re not as transparent as they were initally. And please remember, my e-mail account was hacked in to as Ian’s was, adn they’ve tried to sabotage this site many times. They’re going to do anything they can to destroy it, so beware. Hope you’re all well apart from that though!

    @ Constant Gardener – I’m very interested in the stuff you raised and think this is the direction we should be pursueing in terms of what has gone down with Angelina. I think we’re all fully versed in the sex and drugs stuff now. What else could this really all be about other than money and maybe fraudulent activity? Like Section 9 said, that is the scandal that coul really bring her down and there would be cast iron proof somewhere for. As for those tax records, well all I can say, is considering how much money they make, they don’t seem to be paying an awful lot of tax, do they to anyone else? I always thought they wrote their charitable donations off against tax but maybe there is more to it?

    Reply
  170. stinky-inky said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    @wondering:
    Check out The Ultimate Evil by Maury Terry. Saving the ears from the sacrificed animals is part of the ritual.

    Reply
  171. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    @Keane:
    @Keane:
    To say I just heard about this site yesterday and turns out I know all 3 of them and I have info that will take Angelina down, I’m readfy for war etc is highly, highly suspect. If he/she were ready for war if necessary, the last thing they would do is declare that on a site Angelina is known to be reading every day.

    LOL yes that was a dead give away, they just head about this site yet they knew she was reading it, now the only way they knew that is if they had been reading it too for weeks lol That is why I said, try again, not buying it, that person was so transparent. Then there was Brad will be mad at me if he knew I was doing this and later, Brad if you are reading this, they give him a message ha ha. so funny. go to war my ass that is so typical of a loon to try and disrupt and get people of the subject at hand. deflect and devide.

    Worked for awhile too didn’t it ?

    Reply
  172. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    @Keane:
    Merck’s AIDS vaccine causes AIDS (google). Which continent suffers the most from AIDS? Who is funding AIDS/TB research in Africa through the Global Action for Children? JP Foundation for one. Trevor Neilson (thank you sinker!). The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a known eugenics organization. Globalists are all about population reduction. Trevor came from that foundation and he is well worth the effort to research. Again, credit to sinker for this tip. Think about this, when we hear of criminals we are often surprised to learn of their proximity (especially their professional proximity) to their victims. Who has access to AIDS orphans, refugees, sick and otherwise damaged children? It’s not you and me, it is the global players. What EXACTLY is the relationship with the CFR (a type of secret society posing as a think tank with sinister ambitions including global population reduction, global government)? Why are so many NGO’s accused of child/human trafficking? I chose my alias for a reason. There is something more relevant than who is fucking who (or what). The “enterprise is unique and redundant” seems to be a huge clue. Sugar Ray’s alias (SRRC) is also the acronym for the Sudan-Relief-and-Rehabilitation-Commission (SRRC). Whatever all of this is, I would like to thank this website for breaking my addiction to Facebook.

    Reply
  173. claea said on April 17th, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    @Elle:

    Obviously you care enough to read about them! Does that give you a kick when Ian plays his psycho games claiming Jolie spends hours monitoring his site (I bet she did that right in front of the nanny whom she told to report instantly to Ian – suuure!), claiming she threatens him while you clap and kiss Ian`s ass for the the entertainment that Ian`s defamtion campaign provides to you?

    You say in the end they are just actors? Does that make them less human than you? Because you act like it does! Just how sick are you?

    Reply
  174. Susanna said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    @Constant Gardner:

    I really enjoy reading your contibutions. Keep up the good work. BTW, that movie is one of my favorites! I wish Rachel W. would get more roles like that.

    Reply
  175. Ollie said on April 17th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    speaking of the comments on eugenics, i believe, satanism, of more than one appearance/form, has a (historical) close marriage with eugenics, child abuse/exploitation, etc, doesn’t it?

    Reply
  176. Keane said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    @ CG – very interesting – a girl I was at college with and later worked with works for the UN in Sudan, is the SRRC part of the UN? Well done for noticing that. What do you think “the enterprise is unique and redundant” means? Let’s think on that.

    Reply
  177. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:30 pm

    @Kate:I stand in disagreement about the intentions and the legitimacy of Me. Nuff said.

    Reply
  178. Billi said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Very interesting, thanks for sharing.

    @Kate:
    @Keane:
    Thanks Kate and Keane, you highlighted it better why Me’s supposed insider status and comments were suspect. I also read your cautions about what we post here for legal reasons. Much appreciated.
    Kate I know you are a fan of Panache, would you say the kinds of comments that get posted there for the blind vice guesses could potentially get them in trouble? I mean they name names (celebrities) while guessing about some pretty offensive behavior. Respect your feedback.

    Reply
  179. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    @Constant Gardner:Dang, CG, when you put it that way. I believe. Facebook smacebook. LOL

    Reply
  180. knowone said on April 17th, 2009 at 6:46 pm

    @Constant Gardner:Had to read your post a couple of times to even formulate an intelligent questions for you. So, given your suspected theory about AJ’s role as “front” person for this potentially “heinous” population control endeavor, in your opinion does this mean she is essentially “untouchable?” I mean, this would put her in front of such ginormous power/money/influence that anything she did/does would be taken care of. Unless, like you know, a MAJOR Woodward and Bernstein and all the legal support behind a media conglomerate were involved. What do you think?

    Reply
  181. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    @Keane:
    I believe but am not certain and haven’t really researched this that the SRRC is considered the humanitarian division of the Sudanese govt and as such coordinates with the UN. Sudanese for breakfast, lunch and dinner. I would guess that the AJ and the JP’s were given unprecedented access to adopt children from virtually any country in exchange for their $$$ and to shine their benevolent fake family glow upon certain places such as Namibia and Ethiopia. She made a deal with the devil. We would all agree that as an admitted depressive, cutter, IV drug user and unmarried woman it wouldn’t exactly be easy to adopt a child from anywhere. Ha. Also guessing that their money, whether they know it or not, is being spent to harm the children it was meant to protect. Another guess, vac trials intended to stop the spread of AIDS/HIV are actually doing the opposite. Enterprise is unique yet redundant, a term used in genetic sequencing. For example, a unique yet redundant gene moving AIDS from monkeys to humans. Illnesses must be replicated in order to research them and create treatments for them. A unique yet redundant gene commonly causes chromosomal deletion. Chi du Chat, a common chromosomal deletion often attributed to inter generational incest. Yet another guess, refugee camps are a target rich environment for child trafficking. A final guess, the JP’s know what is happening or has happened and to speak out would reflect back on them and generate a media firestorm to divert attention from global wrongdoings and get it back on the Brad/Jen/Angelina drama. As for the blood diamond theory, AJ’s first humanitarian mission was to Sierra Leone. Obviously I don’t know the answers and am speculating like everyone else. Really, I am guessing from what I have put together from everyone’s posts and some googling. I am an admitted lover of conspiracies and I tend to look at global goings on with a cynical eye and a broader view.

    Reply
  182. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    @Ollie:
    From an article:
    http://us2.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/5413/DARWINISM_IS_THE_IDEOLOGICAL_BASIS_OF_SATANISM

    “Another expression of the satanists’ attachment to social darwinism is their fierce support for the theory of eugenics, itself the product of fascism. The theory of eugenics maintained that the sick and the crippled ought to be eliminated from society, and the number of healthy individuals increased through breeding. The theory was most prominently implemented in Nazi Germany. According to the theory of eugenics, in the same way that healthy animal stock is bred by mating healthy species, by this way a race of humans also be improved. When this line of thinking was adopted in Nazi Germany, tens of thousands of people with genetic and mental diseases were slaughtered ruthlessly.

    Satanism is also in favor of the same terrible mercilessness. Their own publications reveal their view on eugenics:

    Satanists also seek to enhance the laws of nature by concentrating on fostering the practice of eugenics… It is the practice of encouraging people of talent and ability to reproduce, to enrich the gene pool from which our species can grow. This was commonly practiced throughout the world… Until the genetic code is cracked and we can choose the character of our offspring at will, Satanists seek to mate the best with the best. (Magister Peter Gilmore, Satanism the Feared Religion, (http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/Feared.html))
    It seems that you are right on target with this.

    Reply
  183. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:30 pm

    @knowone:
    I think she could be untouchable as you mention however, I think her general sordidness also positions her to take a mighty fall should anything of this nature come out. Her best protection is Trevor Neilson. I do believe that.

    Reply
  184. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Where do you think Brad getting this Sudanese 23 year old pregnant fits in?

    Reply
  185. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    @Kate:
    LOL I have NO idea. If it is true, he could have been fucking around (hardly a new activity for him) or they could hold the belief (due to their extreme narcissim) that their “superior” genetics should be used to create superior children either through surrogates or adoption. After all, they are the “most beautiful couple in the world” until you scratch the surface of the PR machine and get a glimpse of just how arrogant, selfish and cruel they are in pursuit of their own ambitions. On top of that, I will just say again, to me, and I am hardly an intellectual myself, they are just not that bright. A lot of HW isn’t!

    Reply
  186. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    Okay, I am officially in way over my head. I got hooked on this site because I found people (people way more intelligent and knowledgable then me) who seemed to dislike the whole Brangie thing as much as I did. And it was fun to try to unravel the stories and it was fascinating to read the different theories. But now, with talk of hackers and death threats and cautionary tales about who’s who and Ian in hiding; and now International Espionage, Im thinking there is a lot more going on than I anticipated! Its getting really scary in here!

    Reply
  187. Tamara said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    I feel like Im in a Nelson DeMille book! LOL

    Reply
  188. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Well this one is rumored to be suing him, lives in France, four months pregnant and the other one he has pregnant we don’t know where she lives how far along , but Ian did suggest that Brad felt he needed to make up for lost time lol. Maybe he made a deal with her and now she wants more , hard to imagine he could be so stupid but, unless this baby was suppose to be for him and Angelina and then they split, but she got pregnant around the time he hired the PI I would suspect to get the goods on Angelina, so maybe just dumb luck. Hard to say. Many feel that both Brad and Angelina are part of a cult, Bohemian for him, her forgotten which one. I dont’ buy into all this conspiracy stuff though, at least not yet. I don’t think he is deep enough for it. lol and if she were as involved as that these reports Ian has been doing would have been stopped a long time ago. jmo

    Reply
  189. Constant Gardner said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    @Kate:
    Some of the things I have posted defy logic and imagination. I realize that. On top of that it is just my speculation. It could be nothing more than a skank and her pussy whipped boyfriend spreading the crazy around the world!!!! Good night everyone, thanks for letting me post today~

    Reply
  190. p said on April 17th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    @Kate: . When did we get the heads-up Sudanese#1 lives in France?

    Reply
  191. section9 said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    @Keane:

    You people have been going round and round about the drugs and the kids and the fucking Pitt Bull.

    It was never about that. It was NEVER ABOUT THAT AT ALL.

    Angelina got mixed up in something so big that it became to big even for her: that’s the secret. That’s what Ian knows. That’s what will bring her down.

    We’ve cracked the fucking case, people. I’m telling you now-go back up to Keane’s posting about the contributors to the Jolie-Pitt foundation:

    EVERY FUCKING SLEAZY OPERATOR ON WALL STREET.

    Everyone who ran a scam during the good old days contributed to Jolie-Pitt. Why? What were they expecting? Was it a Front? What did Angie get in return for playing Mother Theresa? Why did a brain-dead actress and her husband get to join the Council on Foreign Relations?

    Why would Wall Street players give money to some actresses Vanity Foundation? Why? Why? Why? There are plenty of foundations not tied to so controversial a figure that do much more substantial work.

    They knew she was an addict and a sexaholic who moved up in Hollywood on her back. Why all the money to the Foundation?

    You people need to start thinking like criminal wire and securities fraud investigators, and drop the drugs crap!!!!!

    THIS IS NOT ABOUT DRUGS. THIS IS ABOUT WALL STREET!!!!!

    We may, repeat may, and this is only speculation, find out that Jolie-Pitt was a front. One of many fronts. Perhaps a front for laundering money. Perhaps through UBS, perhaps through offshore accounts for CITI or another outfit. And Jolie-Pitt had the money to buy the right attorneys and the right politicians during the Bush years and, apparently, during the Obama years as well.

    Reply
  192. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    @section9:And Jolie and Pitt are stupid enough to be to enthralled to realize that they could be set up to take the fall.

    Reply
  193. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:48 pm

    @Constant Gardner:
    Yes, but you do make some very thought provoking posts, and I also loved that movie!

    Reply
  194. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    @p:
    Ian I believe mentioned that in a post to one of us. or maybe it was SR one of them.

    Reply
  195. Kate said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    @section9:
    Looking at their tax files, for the J-P foundations, they did not get all that many contributions .. have you looked at them , one thing that did sort of jump out though was that they used some of that money for the MIR Foundation, marketing or something..so they pimped the kids for donations, put that into the foundation, but then never really put all of it in, and then donated some of that to pimp the MIR which Pitt is only a part of, however she is too, which is odd, I think for her to be part of that, a silent partner if you will, she had some deeds , and now we hear that Brad and Jen still own some property together, which is what?

    I agree, it is not about the pitt bull and brother fucking and all that, but part of it in a way is for middle america because she has set herself up as the St Angelina. SR compared them to Rock Hudson and Doris Day, who were not a real couple, just made some movies together and were considered this “golden couple” in those movies. Now Rock was such a nice guy that no one ever wanted to out him as gay and the studio paid off the guy who wrote Hollywood Babylon with 10000.00 to keep his name out of it. They has pic of him with other men too even in the 1950’s. Doris was considered a sweetheart, (like Jen) all , and here we have Jolie trying to be Mother of the Year, when in fact, she is more like what Jen likes to call her, Dirty Jezebel. I would say that image is pretty much a delusion for most.

    Brad had some troubles recently with Homeland Security, what, we do not know. Maybe that is connected to the Jolie-Pitt Foundation, maybe it is under investiagtion, maybe he used those funds for those hookers at 15 K a week, or for the 60 million dollar home. There are so many different possibilites. The 14 million has been referenced by SR as though it was not received, something was up with that, so that lends so sort of credit to there being something odd about the donations for the twins. Since she said he is stupid and should look pretty and they do not put their money together, if this is about money, by bet is on her.

    lol & jmo

    Reply
  196. McDooks said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    @section9:
    VERY VERRRRY INTERESTING.

    Reply
  197. Different Guest said on April 17th, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    @Kate:Blood diamonds are untraceable, nice portable wealth, donations turned into those lovely little rocks? Personally I think it would be a hoot if Trevor was setting her up all along.

    Reply
  198. section9 said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:24 am

    @Kate:

    Lots of people got fabulously wealthy during the runup to this Depression. Jolie and Pitt were two of them. They had advisors telling them where to plant their money.

    Let’s assume that neither person is as stupid as we’re led to believe, and that both were offered the means to turn their Hollywood money into permanent sources of interest-bearing income. I simply look at the list Keane provides above and find an unusual amount of interest in Jolie-Pitt, especially for one with so few accomplishments. Something else is going on here.

    Reply
  199. Кошелев said on April 18th, 2009 at 1:54 am

    И придратся то не к чему вообще. а я так люблю покритиковать чужие мысли)))

    Reply
  200. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 5:19 am

    @ CG – interesting stuff, my friend has just come back from Sierra Leone reporting on the situation out there for a UK doc. I e-mailed him yesterday about other stuff, I’ll look into that.

    @ Section 9 – did you know my e-mail account was hacked into as was Ian’s a few weeks ago? I have proof that it is someone connected to this site and it is being investigated by the UK police. I just thought of one connection: Angelina Jolie, Trevor Nielson, Bill Gates, Microsoft – what do you think? And I agree with you about what you said, the sex and drugs stuff, while relevant in terms of contradcting her carefully honed image, is nowhere near as important as the financial and political stuff. Somebody a while back raised the issue of celebs being used as fronts to campaign about Darfur and raise awareness of the plight of the Sudanese to pave the way for the US govt to go invade and get their rich oil reserves. They said the govt have secretly been preventing the 2 sides in Darfur from coming to an agreement for peace for some time now. Celebs are too stupid to know when they’re being duped. Just someone else’s theory.

    Reply
  201. Mama San said on April 18th, 2009 at 8:55 am

    @knowone: Morning, yes , yes , yes , new day , more news my head is spinning, got my first cup of joe, and ready.
    @McDooks: lol, You are right WHAT was I thinking ?? Ya know I love that word, it just sounds so funny, it’s right up their with douche bag.

    Reply
  202. Constant Gardner said on April 18th, 2009 at 9:34 am

    @section9:
    Now we are on the right track I do believe. This is something higher up the food chain than sex. Sex is the lowest common denominator in this deal IMHO and it is also something the press loves to feed to the masses. The sex scandals are a diversion. It is no different than when say, the war in Iraq was going on, being protested, etc. and what was on our TVs? Britney Spears, Anna Nicole Smith, Micheal Jackson. Media feeding frenzy while real and important stories were not covered. Everyone has a vested interest in keeping this type of story under wraps (whether is it fraud associated with the Wall Street meltdown, a horrific scandal that touches the JP foundation, an unfavorable light shining on a big drug company, etc) Conspiracy lovers like me (LOL I don’t really go for UFO’s, Planet X and that shit-but for corporate and governmental scandals hidden from public view) know that regardless of what the TV news says (hint Big Pharma is a huge advertiser on network TV so who is going to kill that golden goose?) there is always another broader story. As an example and just to make a point, not to cause an argument about this-Let us think about the Somalia Pirate Story which has dominated the news for several days. Did the TV box tell us that multi national corporations have fished the Somali coast dry? Did it tell us that fishing was a primary source of survival? Did it tell us that governments have been dumping toxic waste (such as depleted uranium) into those waters? That shit began to happen when the Somali govt fell. The media told us that the pirates were evil and the ship captain is a hero. Period. Stop. See how that works? My point is that there is a much broader story and subtext that is not being reported. That is how the media is. WHO OWNS THE MEDIA? Multi national corporations. Six of them I believe. How hard is it to coordinate a message among s 6 media conglomerates all with vested interests related to certain stories? Take Bernie Madoff as another example. Traders howled about him to the SEC for years yet the press initially told us that this was a shocking scandal, who could have predicted, etc.

    Reply
  203. Keane said on April 18th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    @ Constant Gardener – you are right about most media being owned by multi-national organisations, all but one notable and major broadcaster in fact. I was only there a few days ago. More to follow.

    Reply
  204. p said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    @Constant Gardner: .Yes! I’ve touched on some of this. Certainly tv advertisers are a major factor dictating decisions on what airs (pharmaceutical ads are a good example.) and what doesn’t. And also what fat-cat-exec is sitting on the board of directors of what. And multi national corporations fishing the Somali coast dry isn’t at all surprising. Unconscionable shit, like moving “peasants,” living on farm-able, life-sustaining land, onto land that isn’t, so that politicians can cater to a few who profit from the exportation of agriculture, has been done in the name of progress and “the greater good”, it seems as far back as I can remember.

    Reply
  205. Kate said on April 18th, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    @section9:
    I will agree it may have something to do with the J-P foundation and their money, he had problem with HL Security, they may be under investigation with the other 50 Americans hiding their money in Swiss banks, but I don’t think it is near as sinister as the rest of you, otherwise Ian could the Feds would be all over them and there would no way for them to keep it quiet. They are actors, not the King and Queen of England. Let’s not give them that much clout. jmho

    Reply
  206. Constant Gardner said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    @Kate:
    Just to put this out there and I do hear what you are saying about these two are not that great, HOWEVER many actors and celebrities did clandestine operations for the USG. Julia Child, for one, actively worked for the OSS:

    Link: http://faqgo.com/2008/08/14/julia-childs-arthur-schlesinger-jr-and-sterling-hayden-were-spies/

    Dr. Ruth was a member of the IDF, in fact she was a sniper!

    http://greghowley.com/113

    Then there is the amazing story of Hedy Lamar, at the time called the most beautiful woman in the world who invented frequency hopping for secure military communications during WWII and is the mother of today’s secure communications technology:

    http://coloradosprings.yourhub.com/ManitouSpringsUtePass/Stories/About-Town/Story~283701.aspx

    Then there was J. Edgar Hoover, posthumously outed as a drag queen who kept massive dossiers on celebrities and their alleged clandestine activities:

    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5859977.html

    Other celebrity spies of World Wars:

    European dancer Mata Hari and television star Julia Child; movie stars Greta Garbo, Cary Grant, Anthony Quayle, Bill Travers, John Ford; writers W. Somerset Maugham, Ian Fleming, Graham Greene, Noel Coward, Malcolm Muggeridge, Helen MacInnes, as well as baseball star Moe Berg, Supreme Court Justices Arthur Goldberg and Byron White, and Teddy Roosevelt’s son Kermit Roosevelt. Some agents became so effective or infamous in their undercover intelligence work, like the Great War’s Ace of Spies Sidney Reilly and the cold war turncoat Kim Philby, that their names are forever linked to espionage as super agents.

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1594769/celebrity_spies_of_the_world_wars_.html?cat=37

    Gloria Estefan was heavily recruited by the CIA to spy on Cuba:

    http://channels.isp.netscape.com/celebrity/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/3427/20090308/1004272405.htm

    Then there is the case of the US vs John Lennon where Nixon famously tried to silence his anti war activities:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_U.S._vs._John_Lennon

    There is also Falwell v Larry Flint (Hustler Mag) in which Larry Flint prevailed in a precedent setting Supreme Court decision regarding the first amendment.

    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=485&invol=46

    So my point is that it would not be unprecedented for actors who are globe hoppers and in particular are traveling in 3rd world nations scooping up kids, meeting with leaders and presidents in countries that are rife with social, religious and governmental conflicts, countries where mega corporations and the USG have a vested interest in getting information-and then these actors also have a foundation (most of them do-I would not be surprised to learn that the JP foundation is actually the owner of many of their properties but that is strictly a guess). Certainly that makes them easy pickings for operative work. No brainer for other acts such as money laundering and god knows what else. Again, these two people are not that bright. They are slaves to their public image. Don’t forget that. I am just saying that celebrity involvement in these sorts of activities, espionage, financial scandals, etc. is not new. It just doesn’t come out until after the fact. PS I am not totally a geezer talking about all of this old Hollywood stuff but I have always been interested in old HW and the associated scandals.

    Reply
  207. Constant Gardner said on April 18th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    @Keane:
    I think that the Darfur theory is right on track.

    Reply
  208. Different Guest said on April 18th, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    @Constant Gardner:Gloria Estefan’s father was part of Bautista’s personal military guard. She’s very right wing.

    Reply
  209. sinker said on April 21st, 2009 at 11:56 am

    @Constant Gardner:
    search on save darfur + pr scam + congo some interesting articles appear. makes me want to know more about celebrities and their causes.

    Reply
  210. гаражные ворота said on May 25th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Спасибо. Сделал для себя немало выводов

    Reply
  211. Интернет маркетинг москва said on May 25th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    И неужели это все так работает???

    Reply
  212. вебмастеру said on May 26th, 2009 at 7:19 am

    Встань, человек! Встань с колен!.. Оторвись от замочной скважины…

    Reply
  213. форум фанов said on May 27th, 2009 at 1:43 am

    Недавно наткнулся на форум фанов, там действительно есть что почитать

    Reply
  214. скупка авто said on May 29th, 2009 at 1:36 am

    А эта ссылка для тех кого интересует автовыкуп

    Reply
  215. rodrigos said on June 1st, 2009 at 7:12 am

    Свет разгоняет тьму, но он не разгоняет вонь. купить диплом высшее

    Reply
  216. фильмы said on June 1st, 2009 at 9:43 am

    Давольно занимательно. Хочу тоже поделиться нужной ссылкой – смотреть фильмы онлайн бесплатно

    Reply
  217. интернет аукцион книг said on June 2nd, 2009 at 2:48 am

    Все ещё ищите где продать? Тогда специально для вас наше предложение – интернет аукцион Украины

    Reply
  218. интерьер said on June 2nd, 2009 at 4:31 am

    А какие вы предпочитаете цветы?

    Reply
  219. антибиотики said on June 2nd, 2009 at 6:12 am

    А кто-то тут пробывал продавать лекарства?

    Reply
  220. похудание said on June 2nd, 2009 at 9:46 am

    Отличный пост, но помните что здоровье важнее всего

    Reply
  221. эротика said on June 3rd, 2009 at 4:07 am

    Чем мельче интересы мужчины, тем крупнее кажется ему каждая мелочь.

    Reply
  222. Мобильные открытки said on June 5th, 2009 at 2:38 am

    А я еще живой, я розовый и теплый….

    Reply
  223. oricluber said on June 5th, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    oriclub

    Reply
  224. Отличная статья. Дамаю для ваших подписчиков была бы еще позновательна статья на тему “предоставляем данные номинального директора

    Reply
  225. личные финансы said on June 12th, 2009 at 1:00 am

    Вот решил внести и свою лепту в развитие вашего блога и поделиться полезной ссылкой с посетителями. доллар прогноз – вот собственно и ссылка…

    Reply
  226. русские программы компьютера said on June 24th, 2009 at 5:59 am

    Очень понравился пост. Я вот тоже хочу поделиться полезной ссылкой. Здесь можно скачать интернет программы. Так что заходите – не пожалеете.

    Reply
  227. How to play spades said on June 24th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    Cool idea. If you have free time, pleas came to my site. Thith is it – How to play spades.

    Reply
  228. доска бесплатных объявлений said on June 29th, 2009 at 3:30 am

    Отличный блог. Мне кажется вам нужно разместить объявление о своем блоге?

    Reply
  229. разместить said on June 29th, 2009 at 6:46 am

    Побольше бы таких постов. Мне кажется вам нужно разместить объявление о своем сайте?

    Reply
  230. proxy headers said on July 1st, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Do you want know your dns records tools?

    Reply
  231. Trace domain tools said on July 1st, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Cool servise – GEO base services

    Reply
  232. негабарит said on July 2nd, 2009 at 2:50 am

    Отличный пост. Как у со стажем блогера хотел бы узнать вашего мнения по поводу – перевозка спецтехники

    Reply
  233. Феноменально. И откуда у людей появляются такие стильные идеи? Прочитал новость с большим удовольствием. Кстати на просторах инета встретил не менее интересный ресурс – интернет казино игровые автоматы, может и вам понравится…

    Reply
  234. блог новый said on July 9th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    Ваш блог отличается суперским изложением мыслей. О нем должны знать массы, так что предлагаю вам полезную ссылку – интересные блоги

    Reply
  235. уголовное дело said on July 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Обращаюсь к владельцу и обывателям сего прекрасного блога. У самого недавно возникли некоторые проблемы юридического плана, так вот для себя нашел отличную ссыль – адвокат москва. Думаю это будет полезно всем.

    Reply
  236. где фильмы скачать форум said on August 31st, 2009 at 3:46 am

    А я бы сказал, что скорее всего здесь коментаторы школьняги. Автор отлично пишет! Так держать! Кстати кому интересно – я обитаю тут.

    Reply
  237. bruatl anal said on October 9th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    If you real man, you must see that – harcore anal

    Reply
  238. web hosting said on October 21st, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    Hey, you must see it – virtual private system

    Reply
  239. эксклюзивные новости said on November 13th, 2009 at 11:27 am

    Текст реально порадовал. Постеру спасибо. В поддержку темы тоже делюсь тем, что близко мне – эксклюзивные новости, Заходите – не пожалеете

    Reply
  240. порно бесплатно said on November 15th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    Пост реально понравился. Автору респект. В поддержку темы тоже делюсь тем, что близко мне – http://www.порно-онлайн.su, Заходите – не пожалеете

    Reply
  241. GlossLip » All Around The Celebosphere said on April 17th, 2009 at 9:57 am

    [...] More trouble for Brangelina, including clandestine trips to Harlem. Color me NOT surprised – IanUnderCover [...]

  242. [...] More trouble for Brangelina, including clandestine trips to Harlem. Color me NOT surprised – IanUnderCover [...]

What do you think? Join the discussion...

How do I change my avatar?

Go to gravatar.com and upload your preferred avatar.

Categories

Posts By Day

April 2009
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Meta